NYSE: CLR
Investor UpdateDecember 2016
Forward‐Looking InformationCautionary Statement for the Purpose of the “Safe Harbor” Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
This presentation includes “forward‐looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. All statements included in this presentation other than statements of historical fact, including, but not limited to, forecasts or expectations regarding the Company’s business and statements or information concerning the Company’s future operations, performance, financial condition, production and reserves, schedules, plans, timing of development, rates of return, budgets, costs, business strategy, objectives, and cash flows, are forward‐looking statements. When used in this presentation, the words “could,” “may,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “budget,” “plan,” “continue,” “potential,” “guidance,” “strategy,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward‐looking statements, although not all forward‐looking statements contain such identifying words.
Forward‐looking statements are based on the Company’s current expectations and assumptions about future events and currently available information as to the outcome and timing of future events. Although the Company believes these assumptions and expectations are reasonable, they are inherently subject to numerous business, economic, competitive, regulatory and other risks and uncertainties, most of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond the Company’s control. No assurance can be given that such expectations will be correct or achieved or the assumptions are accurate. The risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, commodity price volatility; the geographic concentration of our operations; financial, market and economic volatility; the inability to access needed capital; the risks and potential liabilities inherent in crude oil and natural gas exploration, drilling and production and the availability of insurance to cover any losses resulting therefrom; difficulties in estimating proved reserves and other revenue‐based measures; declines in the values of our crude oil and natural gas properties resulting in impairment charges; our ability to replace proved reserves and sustain production; the availability or cost of equipment and oilfield services; leasehold terms expiring on undeveloped acreage before production can be established; our ability to project future production, achieve targeted results in drilling and well operations and predict the amount and timing of development expenditures; the availability and cost of transportation, processing and refining facilities; legislative and regulatory changes adversely affecting our industry and our business, including initiatives related to hydraulic fracturing; increased market and industry competition, including from alternative fuels and other energy sources; and the other risks described under Part I, Item 1A Risk Factors and elsewhere in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10‐K for the year ended December 31, 2015, registration statements and other reports filed from time to time with the SEC, and other announcements the Company makes from time to time.
Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward‐looking statements, which speak only as of the date on which such statement is made. Should one or more of the risks or uncertainties described in this presentation occur, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, the Company’s actual results and plans could differ materially from those expressed in any forward‐looking statements. All forward‐looking statements are expressly qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement. Except as expressly stated above or otherwise required by applicable law, the Company undertakes no obligation to publicly correct or update any forward‐looking statement whether as a result of new information, future events or circumstances after the date of this presentation, or otherwise.
Readers are cautioned that initial production rates are subject to decline over time and should not be regarded as reflective of sustained production levels. In particular, production from horizontal drilling in shale oil and natural gas resource plays and tight natural gas plays that are stimulated with extensive pressure fracturing are typically characterized by significant early declines in production rates.
We use the term "EUR" or "estimated ultimate recovery" to describe potentially recoverable oil and natural gas hydrocarbon quantities. We include these estimates to demonstrate what we believe to be the potential for future drilling and production on our properties. These estimates are by their nature much more speculative than estimates of proved reserves and require substantial capital spending to implement recovery. Actual locations drilled and quantities that may be ultimately recovered from our properties will differ substantially. EUR data included herein remain subject to change as more well data is analyzed.
2
CLR Positioned for Industry‐Leading Growth
3
Key Strengths
Key CatalystsSTACK Meramec Adds up to 25% to CLR net unrisked resource potential
Bakken uncompleted wells ~175 gross operated wells at YE 2016, ~850 MBoe average estimated ultimate recovery (EUR) per well
Bakken core Expanding the core through enhanced completions
SCOOP Springer Oil asset ready for full‐field development
Enhanced completions Improving well performance in all plays
19 operated rigs Maintained momentum and grew expertise during the last 18 months
Strong balance sheet Ample liquidity
Top quartile assets in U.S. (1)
Capital efficiency more than doubled since 2014(2)
Lowest production expense per Boe among select peers(3)
1. See slide 7 for supporting detail 2. See slide 5 for supporting detail 3. See slide 6 for supporting detail
3Q 2016 Highlights
4
STACK costs continue to decline in over‐pressured oil window • Standalone well: Target $8.5 million completed well cost (CWC), down $2.5 million from YE 2015• Density wells: $7.8 million CWC based on Ludwig density results
Record 30‐day Bakken production from enhanced stimulation• Brangus North 1‐2H2: 30‐day cum of 51.8 MBoe (86% oil), 9,900’ lateral• Rath Federal 5‐22H: 30‐day cum of 43.3 MBoe (84% oil), 13,800’ lateral
2016 Guidance updated again on continued strong outperformance • Production guidance: raised to 215,000 ‐ 220,000 Boe per day• Exit rate production: raised to 213,000 ‐ 218,000 Boe per day • Production expense: lowered to $3.50 ‐ $4.00 per Boe • Non‐cash equity compensation: lowered to $0.50 ‐ $0.70 per Boe • CAPEX: increased by $180 million to $1.1 billion, due to increasing completions ‐ expect to be cash flow positive
for full‐year
Impressive STACK and SCOOP density results increasing value • Ludwig density: Eight Meramec wells flowed at a combined peak 24‐hour rate of 21,354 Boe per day (70%
oil); seven new wells average IP of 2,653 Boe per day • May density: Seven Woodford wells flowed at a combined peak 24‐hour rate of 6,881 Boe per day (77%
oil); seven wells average IP of 983 Boe per day
CLR Structural Improvement Since 2014Capital Efficiency & Production Expense Taken to New Level
5
$5.49 $5.69 $5.58$4.30 $3.66
$2.38 $2.07 $2.06
$1.70$1.31
$7.87 $7.76 $7.64
$6.00$4.97
$0
$2
$4
$6
$8
$10
2012 2013 2014 2015 YTD 2016
$/Bo
e
Production and Cash G&A Costs
Cash G&A
1. See “Cash G&A Reconciliation to GAAP“ on slide 39 for a reconciliation of GAAP Total G&A per Boe to Cash G&A per Boe, which is a non‐GAAP measure2. Average net revenue interest of 82% assumed for net capital efficiencyNote: Capital efficiency based on reserves developed per dollar invested
Production Expense
470 506
711
1,1101,206
41 47 54
104
126
020406080100120140160
0200400600800
1,0001,2001,400
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Target
Net Boe
/$1,00
0(2)
EUR Per Operated Well
• Combined production and cash G&A(1) costs DOWN 35%
• Continued low operating costs expected in 2017
• EUR per operated well UP 70% • Capital efficiency(2) (Boe/$
invested) UP 133%
Boe/$1,000 Boe/$1,000Boe/$1,000
Boe/$1,000Boe/$1,000
(1)
From FY 2014 to YTD 2016:
From FY 2014 to FY 2016 target:
MBo
e
(1)
$0
$2
$4
$6
$8
$10
$12
$14
$16
$18
$20
CLR Peer A Peer B Peer C Peer D Peer E Peer F Peer G Peer H Peer I Peer J
$/Bo
e
CLR Lowest Among Select Peers(As of 3Q 2016)
Production Expense
$3.50
CLR Production Expense Comparison
6
Peers include: CXO, DVN, EOG, MRO, NFX, OAS, PXD, WLL, WPX and XEC
Note: Production expense for peer group excludes gathering and transportation expenseSource: Company filings
CLR
Group average $5.50+
7
CLR’s Assets in Top‐Quartile of U.S. Plays
BAKKEN~860,000 NET ACRES
STACK MERAMEC/OSAGE~186,000 NET ACRES
SCOOP WOODFORD~369,000 NET ACRES
SCOOP SPRINGER~188,000 NET ACRES
~1.8 Million Net Reservoir Acres
STACK WOODFORD~171,000 NET ACRES
CLR TOP‐QUARTILE PLAYS
ROR (%
)
Source: Bank of America Merrill Lynch, September 2016
‐10%0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%
STAC
K ‐ O
verpressured
oil
Wattenb
erg ‐ C
ore
Midland
Northern Wolfcam
p A & B Tier I
Lower Spraberry
Bakken
‐ Co
re M
boe
SCOOP ‐ C
onde
nsate
SCOOP ‐ O
ilEagle Ford ‐ Tier 1
STAC
K ‐ O
ilMarcellus ‐ NE PA
STAC
K‐ W
et Gas
Utica ‐Dry Gas
Delaware ‐ B
one Sprin
g & Leo
nard
Eastern Midland
Wolfcam
pMarcellus ‐ SW W
et Gas and
Sup
er Rich
Eagle Ford ‐ Tier 2
Central Platform ‐ Pe
rmian
Marcellus‐ SW Dry gas‐ N
on Core
Cana
Delaware Wolfcam
p Tier II
Utica‐Wet gas
Wattenb
erg ‐ N
oncore
Midland
Wolfcam
p D
Eagle Ford ‐ Tier 3
Southe
rn M
idland
Wolfcam
pBa
kken
‐ Non
‐core
Powde
r River Basin
Uinta Basin and
Greater Natural Buttes
Barnett
Delaware Wolfcam
p Tier 3
Delaware ‐ B
rushy Canyon
Haynesville / East Texas
Fayetteville‐Tier 1
Canyon
Lim
eFayetteville ‐Tier 2
Eagleb
ine
Fayetteville ‐ T
ier 3
STAC
K –Overpressured
Oil
SCOOP –Co
nden
sate
SCOOP –Oil
Bakken
‐Co
re
STAC
K –Oil
Single Well Rate of Return @ $45 WTI & $2.50 HH
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
30 40 50 60
ND Bakken
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
$30 $40 $50 $60
$8.5MM Target 2016
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
$2 $3 $4
~50% ROR
8
STACK Meramec Over‐Pressured Oil SCOOP Woodford Condensate
STACK Woodford (NW Cana JDA(3))
Target EUR: 1,700 MBoeAvg. Lateral: 9,800’
ROR
ROR
ROR
WTI Oil Price, $/BBL Gas Price, $/MCF
Gas Price, $/MCF
Target Enhanced Completion EUR: 2,000 MBoeAvg. Lateral: 7,500’
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
$2 $3 $4
$12.3MM Target 2016
~80% ROR
Target EUR: 2,150 MBoeAvg. Lateral: 9,800’
ROR
WTI Oil Price, $/BBL
CLR Assets Delivering Top‐Tier Rates of Return(1)
1. Pre‐tax rate of return (ROR) is based on projected cash flow and time value of money; costs include completed well cost, production expense, severance tax and variable operating costs. $3.00 Mcf is used for oil price sensitivities and $50 WTI is used for gas price sensitivities. The description of the ROR calculation applies to any ROR reference appearing in this presentation. 2. Estimated ~175 gross operated uncompleted wells at YE 2016, $3.5MM gross cost forward incremental completion cost3. NW Cana economics factor in a ~50% carry from JDA participant
+100% ROR
$9.6MM Enhanced Completion Target 2016
850 MBoe: $3.5MM Completion cost (2)900 MBoe: $6.0MM Target 2016
~40% ROR
$ $ $ $
Avg. Lateral: 9,800’ +100% ROR
Woodford Shale Thickness
50 ft
100 ft
> 200 ft
CLR Leasehold
SCOOPSCOOP
STACKSTACK
9
SCOOP & STACKLeading Acreage Positions in Top‐Tier Plays
~914,000 Net Reservoir Acres
STACKSTACK
Geo
logic Ag
e
Atoka Sands
Morrow Sands
Springer Sands
Springer Shale
Meramec
Osage/Sycamore
Woodford
HuntonLimestone
Penn
sylvan
ian
Mississippian
Devon
ian
Siluria
n
Formation
~369,000
~188,000
‐
‐
SCOOP
~186,000
~171,000
‐STACK
TARG
ETED
RESER
VOIRS
CLR First STACK Density Test Flows 21,354 Boe per Day Meramec Over‐Pressured Oil Window
10
710’
1 Mile
660’660’ 175’175’1,320’1,320’
New WellParent Well
MICROSEISMICSURVEY
Hunton
Upper Meramec
Middle Meramec
Osage
Woodford
Lower Meramec
Ludwig density unit• 8 Meramec wells had combined peak 24‐hour
rate of 21,354 Boe per day (70% oil)• 7 new Meramec wells had average peak 24‐
hour rate of 2,653 Boe per day (70% oil)• Original Ludwig 1‐22‐15XH 24‐hour rate of
2,782 Boe per day (76% oil) with cumulative production of 298 MBoe over 338 days
Operational efficiencies gained compared to parent well• Drilling times averaged 25 days, 36% reduction• CWC averaged $7.8 million, 30% reduction
CLR: Ludwig Density
11
CLR Development Underway in STACK Over‐Pressured Oil
Density Activity
CLR LeaseholdCLR RigsIndustry RigsIndustry Meramec wellCLR Meramec producing wells CLR Meramec wells drilling / completing
Blurton Density
Gillilan Density
Over‐Pressured
Normally‐Pressured
Bernhardt Density
Verona Density
Ludwig Density
De‐risked portion of over‐pressured oil
window
~47,000 net acres in over‐pressured oil window de‐risked and ready for development
CLR oil inventory overview• ~55 operated units • ~60% operated working interest• Average density: at least 8 Meramec
wells and 4 Woodford wells per 1,280‐acre unit
4 unit developments currently drilling• Testing up to 5 wells per zone• 11 additional unit developments
planned
Infrastructure facilitating development• Oil gathering systems• Gas gathering systems• Water recycling facility
CLR Unit Developments Currently Drillingin STACK Over‐Pressured Oil Window
12
Bernhardt
Gillilan
Parent Well
725’
Hunton
Upper MeramecMiddle Meramec
OsageWoodford
Lower Meramec
705’
Blurton• 5 wells in Lower
Meramec and 4 wells in Woodford
• ~1,100’ to ~1,200’ inter‐well spacing
• 640‐acre unit • Results expected 1H
2017
• 4 – 5 wells in Upper & Lower Meramec and Woodford
• ~1,000’ to ~1,600’ inter‐well spacing
• 1,280‐acre unit • Results expected
2017 or 2018
• 3 ‐5 wells in Upper & Lower Meramec and 4 wells in Woodford
• ~1,000’ to ~2,100’ inter‐well spacing
• 1,280‐acre unit • Results expected
2017
Verona• 4 wells in Upper &
Lower Meramec and Woodford
• ~1,300’ inter‐well spacing
• 1,280‐acre unit • Results expected
2017 or 2018
785’
675’
Bernhardt Marks
Foree
13
STACK Meramec: Exceptional, Repeatable Results
Boden
Compton
Blurton
Ludwig
Ladd
Quintle
Data as of October 27, 2016
Well NameProdDays
Cum. Production (MBoe)
Current Rate(Boepd)
Current Flowing Pressure
Boden(1) 329 505 (27% oil) 2,006 (23% oil) 3,060 psi
Yocum 184 309 (99.5% gas) 1,317 (99.5% gas) 1,840 psi
Ludwig(1)(2) (parent well)
338 298 (74% oil) 815 (72% oil) 1,060 psi
Compton(1) 296 278 (69% oil) 616 (66% oil) 1,000 psi
Madeline 141 251 (63% oil) 1,607 (61% oil) 2,665 psi
Blurton(1) 285 228 (74% oil) 534 (65% oil) 1,050 psi
Ladd(1) 363 219 (74% oil) 500 (67% oil) 920 psi
Gillilan 171 204 (61% oil) 897 (51% oil) 875 psi
Quintle(1) 181 181 (69% oil) 749 (61% oil) 775 psi
Marks 408 171 (57% oil) 293 (48% oil) 685 psi
Foree 178 152 (58% oil) 509 (50% oil) 500 psi
Verona(2) 71 132 (69% oil) 653 (66% oil) 1,250 psi
Frankie Jo 104 128 (47% oil) 904 (43% oil) 2,530 psi
Oppel 109 87 (66% oil) 714 (56% oil) 1,000 psi
Bernhardt (1‐mile) 183 69 (70% oil) 239 (67% oil) 220 psi
1. Wells not produced at maximum capacity2. Shut in for Ludwig density stimulation
Normally‐Pressured
Over‐Pressured
CLR Completed Wells With 90 days of production
Yocum
CLR Leasehold Industry Meramec well CLR Meramec well
Fault > 300’ vertical displacement
Verona
Madeline
Frankie Jo
Gillilan
Oppel
14
De‐Risking STACK Through Strategic Step‐OutsExpanding the Play West
Wells Drilling / Completing 186,000 net acres in Meramec • ~50,000 net acres added since Aug. 2015• ~75% low cost legacy acreage
~95% of acreage in over‐pressured window• Reservoir 700’ – 1,200’ thick• ~40% oil, ~40% liquids‐rich, ~20% gas• 60% HBP by YE 2016
Project over 1,200 potential net Meramec and Woodford drilling locations • Targeting 2 Meramec zones on average, 1
Woodford zone• At least 12 wells per 1,280‐acre unit
Oil window CWC trending down • $8.5 million target CWC for standalone
well, down $500k from 2Q 2016
Current activity• 6 rigs drilling Meramec• 5 rigs drilling Woodford • 4 density tests underway in oil window• 22 wells waiting on completion
• 16 in Meramec• 6 in Woodford
CLR LeaseholdCLR RigsIndustry RigsIndustry Meramec wellCLR Meramec producing wells CLR Meramec wells drilling / completing
Over‐Pressured
Normally‐PressuredIntermediate pipe required
3Q 2016 Completion: McBee 1‐3H
IP: 2,110 Boe (58% oil)4,760’ LL
New Completion: Angus Trust 1‐4‐33XHIP: 4,642 Boe (45% oil)
9,500’ LL
Boden 1‐15‐10XHIP: 3,508 Boe (28% oil)
9,800’ LL
7 well density • 6,881 Boe per day (77% oil) ‐ combined peak 24‐hour
rate; average 983 Boe per day per well• 4,868 Boe per day (77% oil)‐ combined peak 24‐hour
rate for 5 new wells; average 974 Boe per day per well • Average CWC: $9.3 million – $500k under standalone
CWC target of $9.8 million • Laterals range from 4,500’ to 9,700’
1. Normalized to 7,500’ lateral
SCOOP Woodford Oil ‐May Density Results
15
May Project‐7 Well Density‐755’ Inter‐well
Spacing
2 Parent wells5 New May Wells1,000MBoe Type Curve
May Daily Production(1)
1 Mile
175’
Upper Woodford
Lower Woodford
100
1,000
10,000
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
Boep
d
Days on Production
MB or TF1MB and TF1
MB and TF1
MB,TF1,TF2
MB,TF1,TF2,TF3
20 miles
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
0 50 100 150
Cum Boe
Days
Strong Bakken Producers
Bakken Performance Continues to Improve Record Wells Through Enhanced Completions
16
CLR Leasehold
2015 Operated Spuds
2016 Operated Spuds
Brangus NorthIP: 2,493 Boe
Rath FederalIP: 2,395 Boe
NashvilleIP: 1,417 Boe
Maryland IP: 1,264 Boe
Brangus North Rath Federal NashvilleMaryland900 MBoe type curve
Two record 30‐day cumulative production:• Brangus North flowed 51.8 MBoe (86% oil), 9,900’ lateral • Rath Federal flowed 43.3 MBoe (84% oil), 13,800’ lateral • Both wells used 2 – 3x more proppant and diverter technology
Data as of October 30, 2016
Well NameProd.Days
Cum. Production (MBoe)
Current Rate(Boepd)
Maryland 2‐16H(1) 160 128.0 689
Nashville 2‐21H(1) 123 120.2 903
Brangus North 1‐2H2 61 105.2 1,625
Rath Federal 5‐22H 75 91.5 898
Recent completions
1. Maryland’s current rate is as of 10/19/16 and Nashville’s current rate is as of 9/6/16
Beginning Work to Capitalize on Uncompleted Bakken Wells
Valuable uncompleted well(1) inventory • Adding 9 gross operated completions in 2016 above original
budget • Projecting ~175 uncompleted wells(2) at YE 2016
• Excluding 15 wells that will be stimulated but not produced with first sales until 2017
• 850 MBoe average EUR (upside potential with larger enhanced completions)
• Over 100% ROR for incremental gross completion cost of $3.5 million for uncompleted wells at $50 WTI and $3.00 Mcf
Adding stimulation crews• Two stimulation crews currently working • Plan to have 4 stimulation crews working by YE 2016
Projected YE 2016 uncompleted well locations
1. Uncompleted wells are a gross operated number 2. Up from 135 uncompleted wells at YE 2015
17
CLR Leasehold
20 miles
Uncompleted wells
MB,TF1,TF2,TF3
MB,TF1,TF2
MB and TF1
$27.40
$24.15
$21.73
$10.67
$8.13$9.1 MM$7.9 MM
$9.8 MM
$7.0 MM$6.0 MM
$0
$5
$10
$15
$20
$25
FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 2H 2015 2016Target
$0
$5
$10
$15
$20
$25
$30
405 MBoe
399 MBoe
550MBoe
800 MBoe
900 MBoe
3641
46
94
123
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 2H 2015 2016Target
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1,000
Boe/$1,000
Focus on Bakken CoreCapital Efficiency at New Level
1. F&D cost is net and computed by taking the CWC divided by Boe2. Actuals for CLR‐operated wells spud in 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016 projected3. Capital efficiency based on reserves developed per dollar invested4. Average net revenue interest of 82% assumed for net F&D and net capital efficiency
per Boe
per Boe
F&D(1) Costs per Boe Down 70%
F&D Cost(4
)
per Boe
Capital Efficiency (Net Boe
/$1,00
0)(4
)
Boe/$1,000Boe/$1,000
Boe/$1,000
Capital Efficiency(3) Up 242%
EUR pe
r Well (MBo
e)
18
per Boe
per Boe
Boe/$1,000
Well C
ost(2
) ($M
M)
FY 2015 FY 2015
North Dakota Pipeline Authority and CLR estimates
EST
‐
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Local Refining Pipeline Rail Bakken Production
Thou
sand
Bop
d
Bakken Takeaway Capacity
Rail PipelineFuture Pipeline
Energy Transfer DAPLExpected Online: 2017
450,000 to 570,000 Bopd
19
CLR Bakken Differentials Improving90+% of Bakken Barrels on Pipe
Energy Transfer ETCOPExpected Online: 2017
450,000 to 570,000 Bopd
EST
$6.89 $5.87 $6.13 $5.49 $5.69 $5.58 $4.30 $3.66
$2.19 $2.35 $2.36 $2.38 $2.07 $2.06 $1.70 $1.31
$2.95 $4.47 $5.82 $5.58 $6.02 $5.54$2.47 $1.74
$1.72 $3.34 $3.40 $3.95 $4.74 $4.49
$3.86 $4.08
$30.93
$43.32
$54.74
$48.59
$53.52
$48.86
$19.15
$13.12
$44.68
$59.35
$72.45
$65.99
$72.04$66.53
$31.48
$23.91
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
$70
$80
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 YTD 2016
Low Costs(1) Competitively Positions CLR in Any Environment
69%73%
76%74% 74%
73%
$10.79 per Boe,~12% lower than FY 2015
1. Cash margin presented on this slide represents the Company’s average sales price for a period expressed in barrels of oil equivalent (Boe) less production expenses, production taxes, G&A expenses (exclusive of non‐cash equity compensation expenses), and interest expense, all expressed on a per‐Boe basis. Cash margin does not reflect all activities of the Company that give rise to cash inflows and outflows and specifically excludes income and costs associated with derivative settlements, service operations, exploration activities, asset dispositions, and various non‐operating activities. These items are excluded from the computation of cash margin because they can vary significantly from period to period in a manner that does not correlate with changes in the Company’s production and sales volumes. Therefore, these items are not typically utilized by management on a per‐Boe basis in assessing the performance of the Company’s E&P operations from period to period. See “Continuing to Deliver Strong Margins” on slide 35 for additional details on the method for calculating cash margin. 2. See “Cash G&A Reconciliation to GAAP“ on slide 39 for a reconciliation of GAAP Total G&A per Boe to Cash G&A per Boe, which is a non‐GAAP measure3. Based on average oil equivalent price (excluding derivatives and including natural gas)
Production Expense Cash G&A(2) Production/Severance Tax & Other Interest Cash Margin(1)
61% 55%
20
Avg. Realized
$/Boe
(3)
Unsecured Credit Facility• Ample liquidity with $2.75 billion
revolver; can upsize to $4.0 billion(1)
• No borrowing base redetermination
• 2‐year extension option beyond 2019(1)
Financial Strength • Redeemed 2020 Notes and 2021
Notes on 11/10/16
• No near‐term debt maturities (Earliest is $500 million in 11/2018)
• 4.3% average interest rate YTD $500 $295 $200
$400
$2,000
$1,500
$1,000 $700
$2,455
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2044
LIBOR + 1.5%
Financial Metrics(2)
Net Debt(3)/3Q 2016 Annualized EBITDAX(4) 4.40x Net Debt(3) /
TTM EBITDAX(4) 4.13x
Net Debt(3)/3Q 2016 Avg. Daily Production $32,779 Net Debt(3)/YE 2015
Proved Reserves $5.56
($MM)
Debt Maturities Summary
No maturities for ~2 years
$2.75 billioncredit facility
7.375%7.125%
5.0%
4.5%
3.8%
4.9%
RevolverBalance10/31/16
Callable3/15/17
Undrawn
1. With lender consent 2. All ratios are as of 9/30/16, except where noted3. Net debt is a non‐GAAP measure and represents total debt as reflected on the Company’s balance sheet of $6.83 billion, less cash and cash equivalents of $19.5 million as determined under GAAP as of September 30, 20164. See slide 37 for reconciliation of GAAP net income and net cash provided by operating activities to EBITDAX , which is a non‐GAAP measure5. Bonds redeemed 11/10/16 using revolver proceeds
Strong Liquidity & Financial Profile
21
Redeemed 11/10/16(5)
Updated 2016 Guidance
Production & Capital Guidance as of August 2016
Guidance as of November 2016
Production (Boe per day) 210,000 – 220,000 215,000 ‐ 220,000
Capital expenditures (non‐acquisition) $920 million $1.1 billion
Operating ExpensesProduction expense ($ per Boe) $3.75 ‐ $4.25 $3.50 ‐ $4.00
Production tax (% of oil & gas revenue) 6.75% ‐ 7.25% 6.75% ‐ 7.25%
Cash G&A expense(1) ($ per Boe) $1.20 ‐ $1.60 $1.20 ‐ $1.60
Non‐cash equity compensation ($ per Boe) $0.65 ‐ $0.85 $0.50 ‐ $0.70
DD&A ($ per Boe) $20.00 ‐ $22.00 $20.00 ‐ $22.00
Average Price Differentials NYMEX WTI crude oil ($ per barrel of oil) ($7.00) ‐ ($8.00) ($7.00) ‐ ($8.00)
Henry Hub natural gas(2) ($ per Mcf) $0.00 ‐ ($0.65) $0.00 ‐ ($0.65)
Income tax rate 38% 38%
Deferred taxes 90% ‐ 95% 90% ‐ 95%
Bolded item above in guidance denotes a change from the previous disclosure1. See “Cash G&A Reconciliation to GAAP“ on slide 39 for a reconciliation of GAAP total G&A per Boe to cash G&A per Boe, which is a non‐GAAP measure2. Includes natural gas liquids production in differential range
22
CONTACT INFORMATION
J. Warren HenryVice President, Investor Relations & ResearchPhone: 405‐234‐9127Email: [email protected]
Alyson L. GilbertManager, Investor Relations Phone: 405‐774‐5814Email: [email protected]
Website:www.CLR.com/Investors
23
24
REFERENCE MATERIALS
Updated 2016 Capital Budget Allocation
Rigs
Gross Operated
Wells
Net Operated
WellsTotal Net Wells(1)
Bakken 4 29 23 46
SCOOP 4 33 25 28
STACK 6 32 17 19
NW Cana JDA & Other 5 25 10 11
Totals 19 119 75 104
Bakken Drilling
$453
SCOOP Drilling
$214
STACK Drilling
$208
1. Represents projected net operated & non-operated wells
$1.1 Billion in non-acquisition capex
($ in millions)Other $68
NW Cana JDA $64
Leasehold $93 2016 wells with first production
25
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
STACK / NW Cana
SCOOP
Bakken
Legacy
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 3Q'16 2016E
STACK / NW Cana
SCOOP
Bakken
Legacy
~217,5009%
Boe Per D
ay
MMBo
e
Targeting 215,000 to 220,000 Boe per Day Production Average in 2016
Total Proved Reserves Down 9% YOY with 47% Reduction in WTI Prices
207,8401,226
34%
54%
5%
32%
52%
7%
44%56%
Natural
Gas Oil
For 3Q 2016:
43%57%
Natural
Gas Oil
For YE 2015:
26
Historical Organic Growth
7%
0
10
20
30
10
100
1,000
10,000
0 6 12 18 24 30 36
Well Cou
nt
Boe pe
r day
Producing Months
Bakken Type Curve
Well Count900 MBOE TC BOEPD2016 Actual BOEPD
0
10
20
30
40
0 6 12 18 24 30 3610
100
1,000
10,000
Well Cou
nt
Producing Months
Boe pe
r day
STACK Over‐Pressured Oil Type CurveWell Count
Type Curve (Normalized to 9,800' LL)
Series2
0
10
20
30
40
0 6 12 18 24 30 36100
1,000
10,000
Well Cou
nt
Producing Months
Boe pe
r day
NW Cana JDA Type CurveWell CountType Curve (Normalized to 9,800' LL)Act. Production (Normalized to 9,800')
Enhanced Completions Type Curves
27
2,150 MBoe Type Curve (Norm. to 9,800’ LL) Act. Production (Norm. to 9,800’ LL)900 MBoe Type Curve (Norm. to 9,800’ LL)
Act. Production (Norm. to 9,800’ LL)
0
10
20
30
40
0 6 12 18 24 30 36100
1,000
10,000
Well Cou
nt
Producing Months
Boe pe
r day
SCOOP Condensate Fairway Type CurveEnhanced Well CountEnhanced Condensate Fairway ProductionEnhanced Condensate Fairway TC (7,500' LL)2,000 MBoe Type Curve (Norm. to 7,500’ LL)Act. Production (Norm. to 7,500’ LL)
1,700 MBoe Type Curve (Norm. to 9,800’ LL)Act. Production (Norm. to 9,800’ LL)
Boden‐YocumUnique Results Defined by Fault
28
• Yocum designed to test down‐thrown side of fault identified from 3D seismic east of Boden
• Up to 525’ of vertical displacement on fault
• Boden on up‐thrown side of fault in condensate window
• Yocum on down‐thrown side of fault in gas window
• Only fault of this magnitude identified by 3D seismic/well control that could influence production
• Results increase acreage in gas window by 2%
Yocum 1‐35‐26XHIP: 17 Bopd, 14 MMcfd824,000 GORDays online: 184Cum Prod: 309 MBoe (99.5% gas) Current rate: 1,317 Boepd (99.5% gas)
Boden 1‐15‐10XHIP: 1,000 Bopd, 15.0 MMcfd15,747 GORDays online: 329 Cum Prod: 505 MBoe (27% oil) Current rate: 2,006 Boepd (23% oil)
5mi
~400
’
Boden 1‐15‐10XHUpper Meramec
Yocum 1‐35‐26XHUpper Meramec
100
1,000
10,000
0 30 60 90 120 150 180
MCFED
Days on Production
Newy Daily Production(1)
100
1,000
10,000
0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480 540
MCFED
Days on Production
Honeycutt Daily Production(1)9 New Honeycutt Wells
7500' Neck Type Curve
100
1,000
10,000
0 90 180 270 360 450 540 630
MCFED
Days on Production
Poteet Daily Production(1)10 New Poteet Wells7500' Neck Type Curve
SCOOP Woodford Condensate WindowDensity Projects – Strong Repeatable Results
1. Normalized to 7,500’ lateral; Cumulative production as of 10/30/16
29
7 New Vanarkel Wells1,725 MBoe Type CurveEnhanced Completion 2,000 MBoe Type Curve
Unit cumulative production: 44,246 MMcfe (7% oil)
Unit cumulative production: 31,562 MMcfe (28% oil)
7 New Newy Wells1,725 MBoe Type CurveEnhanced Completion 2,000 MBoe Type Curve
1,725 MBoe Type Curve 1,725 MBoe Type Curve
100
1,000
10,000
0 90 180 270 360
MCFED
Days on Production
Vanarkel Daily Production(1)
New Vanarkel Wells
Woodford Condensate 7500' Type Curve
Enhanced Woodford Condensate 7500' Type Curve
Unit cumulative production: 20,593 MMcfe (25% oil)
Unit cumulative production: 27,137 MMcfe (15% oil)
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
400,000
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300
Cum
BO
E
Days
Enhanced Completions
Offset Wells
1,725 MBOE Type Curve
6 Miles
CLR Leasehold
Woodford HZ Producing WellCLR Enhanced Completion
Gas Condensate Oil
12 Miles
SCOOP Woodford CondensateGrowing Through Step‐Outs and Enhanced Completions
3030
1. When compared to offset production at $50 WTI and $3.00 Mcf
Enhanced completions increasing performance• Delivering 40% production uplifts• Increased type curve EUR by 15% to 2,000 MBoe• > 100% ROR for incremental capital of $400,000(1)
• ~50% more proppant per foot on average
4 rigs drilling
60+ miles
24 wells with > 180 days of production
180 days~40% higher than
offsets
SCOOP Woodford OilEnhanced Completions Success Increase EUR 30%
31
23 enhanced completions outperform legacy offsets• ~30% increase in 180‐day rate• ~30% increase in EUR to 1.3 MMBoe
per well for 2‐mile lateral • ~30% ROR(1) for $9.8 million CWC • At least 50,000 net acres upgraded to
new EUR model
1. Assumes $50 WTI and $3.00 Mcf
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
160,000
180,000
200,000
0 50 100 150 200
Cum Boe
Days
Enhanced completions (23 wells)Offset wells1,340 MBoe Type Curve
180 days~30% higher than
offsets
Oil Window Enhanced Completions
12 MilesCLR Leasehold
Woodford HZ Producing WellCLR Enhanced Completion
Gas Condensate Oil
MAY INFILL
6 Miles
940 MBoe Type Curve
12 Miles
SCOOP
Hartley Pilot
CLR Leasehold Non‐Op. Springer Shale Producer
CLR Springer Shale ProducersCurrent Springer Density Test
32
SCOOP Springer Oil‐Rich Asset
Springer Fairway
JeannaPilot
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
$30 $40 $50 $60
$7.0MM Target 2016$7.8MM YE 2015
WTI Oil Price, $/BBL
ROR
Target EUR: 940 MBoeAvg. Lateral: 4,500’
Untested upside • Longer laterals – 7,500’ to 10,000’• Enhanced completions
0102030405060708090
0 6 12 18 24 30 3610
100
1,000
10,000
Well Cou
nt
Producing Months
Boe pe
r day
Well Count Type Curve (Normalized to 4,500' LL)Act. Production (Normalized to 4,500')
Springer ROR
Closed October 14, 2016
$296 million sale price
~30,000 net acres
Net production of ~700 Boepd
Minimal proved reserves (less than 1%)
CLR Leasehold
Woodford Producing Well
CLR 2016 Completion
Outline of leasehold sale
33
SCOOP WoodfordNon‐Strategic Asset Sale
MB or TF1
CANADA
MB and TF1
MB,TF1,TF2
MB,TF1,TF2,TF3MB and TF1
cCLR Leasehold2015 Operated Spuds2016 Operated Spuds
Closed September 30, 2016
$215 million sale price
80,000 net acres• Non‐strategic acreage• 68,000 net acres in Williams County,
North Dakota• 12,000 net acres in Roosevelt County,
Montana
Net production of ~2,700 Boepd
Minimal proved reserves (less than 1%)
34
BakkenNon‐Strategic Asset Sale
Outline of leasehold and production sold
1. Cash margin represents the Company’s average sales price for a period expressed in barrels of oil equivalent (Boe) less production expenses, production taxes, G&A expenses (exclusive of non‐cash equity compensation expenses), and interest expense, all expressed on a per‐Boe basis. Cash margin does not reflect all activities of the Company that give rise to cash inflows and outflows and specifically excludes income and costs associated with derivative settlements, service operations, exploration activities, asset dispositions, and various non‐operating activities. These items are excluded from the computation of cash margin because they can vary significantly from period to period in a manner that does not correlate with changes in the Company’s production and sales volumes. Therefore, these items are not typically utilized by management on a per‐Boe basis in assessing the performance of the Company’s E&P operations from period to period.2. See “EBITDAX reconciliation to GAAP” on slide 37 for a reconciliation of GAAP net income and net cash provided by operating activities to EBITDAX, which is a non‐GAAP measure. 3. Average costs per Boe have been computed using sales volumes and exclude any effect of derivative transactions.4. See “Cash G&A Reconciliation to GAAP“ on slide 39 for a reconciliation of GAAP Total G&A per Boe to Cash G&A per Boe, which is a non‐GAAP measure
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 3Q 2016 YTD 2016
Realized oil price ($/Bbl) $54.44 $70.69 $88.51 $84.59 $89.93 $81.26 $40.50 $37.66 $33.51
Realized natural gas price ($/Mcf) $2.95 $4.26 $4.87 $3.73 $4.87 $5.40 $2.31 $2.02 $1.57Oil production (Bopd) 27,459 32,385 45,121 68,497 95,859 121,999 146,622 116,277 131,873Natural gas production (Mcfpd) 59,194 65,598 100,469 174,521 240,355 313,137 450,558 549,374 524,441Total production (Boepd) 37,324 43,318 61,865 97,583 135,919 174,189 221,715 207,840 219,280
EBITDAX ($000's)(2) $450,648 $810,877 $1,303,959 $1,963,123 $2,839,510 $3,776,051 $1,978,896 $386,789 $1,229,507Key Operational Statistics (per Boe)(3)
Average oil equivalent price (excludes derivatives) $44.68 $59.35 $72.45 $65.99 $72.04 $66.53 $31.48 $26.42 $23.91
Production expense $6.89 $5.87 $6.13 $5.49 $5.69 $5.58 $4.30 $3.50 $3.66
Production tax and other $2.95 $4.47 $5.82 $5.58 $6.02 $5.54 $2.47 $1.81 $1.74
Cash G&A(4) $2.19 $2.35 $2.36 $2.38 $2.07 $2.06 $1.70 $1.63 $1.31Interest $1.72 $3.34 $3.40 $3.95 $4.74 $4.49 $3.86 $4.29 $4.08
Total of selected costs $13.75 $16.03 $17.71 $17.40 $18.52 $17.67 $12.33 $11.23 $10.79
Cash margin(1) $30.93 $43.32 $54.74 $48.59 $53.52 $48.86 $19.15 $15.19 $13.12Cash margin % 69% 73% 76% 74% 74% 73% 61% 57% 55%
35
Continuing to Deliver Strong Margins(1)
We use a variety of financial and operational measures to assess our performance. Among these measures is EBITDAX. Wedefine EBITDAX as earnings (net income (loss)) before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation, depletion, amortizationand accretion, property impairments, exploration expenses, non‐cash gains and losses resulting from the requirements ofaccounting for derivatives, non‐cash equity compensation expense, and losses on extinguishment of debt. EBITDAX is not ameasure of net income or net cash provided by operating activities as determined by GAAP.
Management believes EBITDAX is useful because it allows us to more effectively evaluate our operating performance andcompare the results of our operations from period to period without regard to our financing methods or capital structure.Further, we believe that EBITDAX is a widely followed measure of operating performance and may also be used by investorsto measure our ability to meet future debt service requirements, if any. We exclude the items listed above from net income(loss) and net cash provided by operating activities in arriving at EBITDAX because those amounts can vary substantiallyfrom company to company within our industry depending upon accounting methods and book values of assets, capitalstructures and the method by which the assets were acquired.
EBITDAX should not be considered as an alternative to, or more meaningful than, net income (loss) or net cash provided byoperating activities as determined in accordance with GAAP or as an indicator of a company’s operating performance orliquidity. Certain items excluded from EBITDAX are significant components in understanding and assessing a company’sfinancial performance, such as a company’s cost of capital and tax structure, as well as the historic costs of depreciableassets, none of which are components of EBITDAX. Our computations of EBITDAX may not be comparable to other similarlytitled measures of other companies.
See the following page for reconciliations of our net income (loss) and net cash provided by operating activities to EBITDAXfor the applicable periods.
EBITDAX Reconciliation to GAAP
36
The following tables provide reconciliations of our net income (loss) and net cash provided by operating activities to EBITDAX for the periods presented:
In thousands 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 3Q 2016 YTD 2016TTM at 9/30/16
Net income (loss) $ 71,338 $ 168,255 $ 429,072 $ 739,385 $ 764,219 $ 977,341 $ (353,668) $ (109,621) $ (427,348) $ (567,025)Interest expense 23,232 53,147 76,722 140,708 235,275 283,928 313,079 82,074 244,949 325,124
Provision (benefit) for income taxes 38,670 90,212 258,373 415,811 448,830 584,697 (181,417) (65,276) (259,254) (342,048)Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion 207,602 243,601 390,899 692,118 965,645 1,358,669 1,749,056 414,671 1,320,423 1,781,201Property impairments 83,694 64,951 108,458 122,274 220,508 616,888 402,131 57,689 202,728 283,729
Exploration expenses 12,615 12,763 27,920 23,507 34,947 50,067 19,413 3,987 8,726 13,458
Impact from derivative instruments:
Total (gain) loss on derivatives, net 1,520 130,762 30,049 (154,016) 191,751 (559,759) (91,085) (15,237) 21,768 5,228
Total cash received (paid), net 569 35,495 (34,106) (45,721) (61,555) 385,350 69,553 5,274 83,241 104,260
Non‐cash (gain) loss on derivatives, net 2,089 166,257 (4,057) (199,737) 130,196 (174,409) (21,532) (9,963) 105,009 109,488
Non‐cash equity compensation 11,408 11,691 16,572 29,057 39,890 54,353 51,834 13,228 34,274 45,819
Loss on extinguishment of debt ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 24,517 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
EBITDAX (non‐GAAP) $ 450,648 $ 810,877 $ 1,303,959 $ 1,963,123 $ 2,839,510 $ 3,776,051 $ 1,978,896 $ 386,789 $ 1,229,507 $ 1,649,746
In thousands 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 3Q 2016 YTD 2016TTM at 9/30/16
Net cash provided by operating activities $ 372,986 $ 653,167 $ 1,067,915 $ 1,632,065 $ 2,563,295 $ 3,355,715 $ 1,857,101 $ 366,167 $ 863,888 $ 1,305,497Current income tax provision (benefit) 2,551 12,853 13,170 10,517 6,209 20 24 (10) 2 4Interest expense 23,232 53,147 76,722 140,708 235,275 283,928 313,079 82,074 244,949 325,124Exploration expenses, excluding dry hole costs 6,138 9,739 19,971 22,740 25,597 26,388 11,032 3,960 8,493 13,028Gain on sale of assets, net 709 29,588 20,838 136,047 88 600 23,149 6,158 103,174 103,392Tax benefit (deficiency) from stock‐based compensation 2,872 5,230 ‐‐ 15,618 ‐‐ ‐‐ 13,177 (9,460) (9,460) (9,460)Other, net (3,890) (3,513) (4,606) (7,587) (1,829) (17,279) (10,044) (2,002) (9,023) (11,043)Changes in assets and liabilities 46,050 50,666 109,949 13,015 10,875 126,679 (228,622) (60,098) 27,484 (76,796)EBITDAX (non‐GAAP) $ 450,648 $ 810,877 $ 1,303,959 $ 1,963,123 $ 2,839,510 $ 3,776,051 $ 1,978,896 $ 386,789 $ 1,229,507 $ 1,649,746
37
EBITDAX Reconciliation to GAAP
ADJUSTED Earnings Reconciliation to GAAPOur presentation of adjusted earnings and adjusted earnings per share that exclude the effect of certain items are non‐GAAP financial
measures. Adjusted earnings and adjusted earnings per share represent earnings and diluted earnings per share determined under U.S. GAAP without
regard to non‐cash gains and losses on derivative instruments, property impairments and gains and losses on asset sales. Management believes these
measures provide useful information to analysts and investors for analysis of our operating results. In addition, management believes these measures are
used by analysts and others in valuation, comparison and investment recommendations of companies in the oil and gas industry to allow for analysis
without regard to an entity’s specific derivative portfolio, impairment methodologies, and property dispositions. Adjusted earnings and adjusted
earnings per share should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for earnings or diluted earnings per share as determined in accordance with
U.S. GAAP and may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies. The following tables reconcile earnings and diluted
earnings per share as determined under U.S. GAAP to adjusted earnings and adjusted diluted earnings per share for the periods presented.
38
3Q 2016 3Q 2015 YTD 2016 YTD 2015
In thousands, except per share data $ Diluted EPS $ Diluted EPS $ Diluted EPS $ Diluted EPS
Net income (loss) (GAAP) $ (109,621) $ (0.30) $ (82,423) $ (0.22) $(427,348) $ (1.15) $(213,992) $ (0.58)
Adjustments:
Non‐cash (gain) loss on derivatives (9,963) (34,610) 105,009 (26,011)
Property impairments 57,689 96,697 202,728 321,130
Gain on sale of assets (6,158) (288) (103,174) (22,930)
Total tax effect of adjustments (14,800) (22,888) (76,447) (87,078)
Total adjustments, net of tax 26,768 0.08 38,911 0.10 128,116 0.34 185,111 0.50
Adjusted net income (loss) (Non‐GAAP) $ (82,853) $ (0.22) $ (43,512) $ (0.12) $ (299,232) $ (0.81) $ (28,881) $ (0.08)
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding 370,483 369,599 370,327 369,499
Adjusted diluted net income (loss) per share (Non‐GAAP) $ (0.22) $ (0.12) $ (0.81) $ (0.08)
Cash G&A Reconciliation to GAAP
39
Our presentation of cash general and administrative (“G&A”) expenses per Boe is a non‐GAAP measure. We define cash G&A per Boe as total G&A determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP less non‐cash equity compensation expenses and corporate relocation expenses, expressed on a per‐Boe basis. We report and provide guidance on cash G&A per Boe because we believe this measure is commonly used by management, analysts and investors as an indicator of cost management and operating efficiency on a comparable basis from period to period. In addition, management believes cash G&A per Boe is used by analystsand others in valuation, comparison and investment recommendations of companies in the oil and gas industry to allow for analysis of G&A spend without regard to stock‐based compensation programs which can vary substantially from company to company. Cash G&A per Boe should not be considered as an alternative to, or more meaningful than, total G&A per Boe as determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP and may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies.
The following table reconciles total G&A per Boe as determined under U.S. GAAP to cash G&A per Boe for the periods presented.
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 3Q 2016 YTD 2016Total G&A per Boe (GAAP) $3.03 $3.09 $3.23 $3.42 $2.91 $2.92 $2.34 $2.32 $1.88Less: Non‐cash equity compensation per Boe ($0.84) ($0.74) ($0.73) ($0.82) ($0.80) ($0.86) ($0.64) ($0.69) ($0.57)Less: Relocation expenses per Boe ‐ ‐ ($0.14) ($0.22) ($0.04) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Cash G&A per Boe (non‐GAAP) $2.19 $2.35 $2.36 $2.38 $2.07 $2.06 $1.70 $1.63 $1.31