In some countries, teenagers involve in part-time work as they are students. Do you agree or disagree they should do part time?

Many teenagers do part time job even if their parents give them enough money. Some people say that what they should do is to learn at school, not to work. However, I basically agree with the statement that they should do part time work.

Early exposure to the society is significant for them. They understand how and why people work by doing jobs by themselves. The understanding of the ways and meanings surely encourages them to think of what they should do now. For example, if someone experiences various types of job and find the interesting one to him, he will know what he should learn and can decide which school he needs to attend.

Also, doing job enhances the independence from their parents. Financial dependence accounts for a part of the dependence on the parents. If they earn some money, it would help their self-dependence.

There are, however, some disadvantages for them. If they are interested in doing the job and they spend excessive time for it, they have less time to study and might fail to get the grade. And there are some jobs which are not suitable for them, for example, prostitution. They might happen to engage in such unfavorable jobs, because they have less information about the jobs.

In conclusion, if the rule is set to limit the time they spend and kind of the job they take part in, the good points will far outweigh the bad points. Therefore, I tend to agree with the above statement.

In some countries, marriages are arranged by the parents, but in other cases people choose their own marriage partner. Discuss both systems.

How people find their marriage partners is different from countries to countries and from person to person even in one country. People commonly marry the partner arranged by their parents in Asian countries, while they commonly find their partner by themselves in western countries. Both systems have the advantages and disadvantages.

Choosing the marriage partner by oneself is natural for people who want to marry. They can find the partner they want to stay together with. If they have to stay home with the person they do not like, they are not happy with the marriage.

Marriage is basically the way of making families where the members understand and cherish each other and their bonds are very strong. People can understand each other when they choose their partner more than when their parents arrange the partner for them.

On the other hand, the divorce rate in arranged marriage is not so high, even if they do not love each other at the beginning. The reason for divorce is not always the problem between the two, but sometimes customs. In arranged marriage, their parents find the person who has the similar custom for them so that they can not divorce for that reason.

In conclusion, choosing the marriage partner by oneself is natural and favorable when people marry and make families. Arranged marriage is unnatural, but had good point. It is acceptable if the parents ask their children to marry the partner they find in advance.

Most schools offer some type of physical education programs to their students. Why is physical education important? Should physical education classes be required or optional?

Students are supposed to take physical education classes. I think they are important for the children to grow up and should be required to take. I have three reasons to support my idea.

Students learn how to exercise and stay fit in the physical education classes. Exercise can burn out the body fat and is recommended as the best way to stay healthy. And it makes us feel refreshed and is good for the mental conditions. They also learn what to eat to stay healthy in the classes and it helps to correct the eating habits.

Students also learn how to establish the relationships with other member through doing sports. Physical educations classes are suitable place to learn. They can enjoy the school lives if they make the good relationships with the other students. And establishing the good relationship with other people is also important when they work.

There is, however, disadvantage for requiring students to take physical education classes. Some students are not interested in doing sports and are not willing to attend the classes. Most schools force them to attend the classes without giving a chance for them to learn the importance of taking the physical education. They may get ready to take the classes if they understand.

In conclusion, if teachers teach the reluctant students why taking physical education is important and persuade them, the good points will far outweigh the bad points. Therefore, I agree with the statement that physical education classes are important and should be required.

More and more people are relying on the Internet as their major source of news and information. What advantages does the Internet have for the average person? What disadvantages could it have now or in the future?

The introduction of home computers and Internet allows us to have an easy access to news and information. Everyone admit that Internet is helpful for daily life. However, there are advantages and disadvantages of Internet and it still remained controversial in some aspects.

Internet brings a fast and convenient access to the information if you have a computer. We can collect various types of information by searching them through Internet. We can obtain news much faster than other type of news sources like televisions and newspapers. Mail can be sent and reached in a minute to the other person even if he is distant from us.

Shopping is another useful option of Internet. We can buy anything through Internet at home. We can obtain the information related to the thing we want to buy, such as prices, when we buy something and can buy the cheapest one.

There are, however, disadvantages for Internet. Internet provides too much information and we sometimes can not select the suitable one by ourselves. Search engine helps us a lot, but it is not enough. We should create other systems to help us to pick up the helpful information to us. Internet crimes happen everywhere and we may get involved in them before we know them. Special cares should be taken to avoid the involvements.

In conclusion, there are actually advantages and disadvantages of the Internet. If bad points are reduced, good points will far outweigh the bad points. I hope Internet will remain the helpful tool to our daily lives.

More and more fathers are taking a break from their careers so that they can stay home and take care of their children while their wives work. This is better for the family than having both parents work full-time. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Since we realized that males and females should be equal both inside and outside the house and related laws took into effect, there are more fathers taking a break and stay home when they have their babies. I agree with the statement that fathers should take a break and take care of the children while their wives work.

Males used to work outside, while wives used to stay home and take care of their children. As the society accepts the notion that males and females are treated equal, more wives work outside the house. This trend is welcome to the mature society. And fathers should have a break and take care of their children for maintain this trend.

Fathers can receive more respects from their families, spending enough time with families. Fathers used to spend much time working outside the house and not to have enough time being with their children. As a result, respects that they should receive from their families, especially from their children, reduced. Spending enough time with their children helps to revive the value of fathers in the families.

There is, however, disadvantage for taking a break from their careers. The company will lose the workforce when they take a break. Some companies do not have sufficient person to carry the business. If one of the members takes a break, the other members have to work more. The system that supports the leave for taking care of the children is needed.

In conclusion, there are both good points and bad points of taking a break for taking care of the children. If the systems that help the leave, the bad points will reduced. Therefore, I tend to support the above statement.

More and more families have computers in their homes. What advantages and disadvantages do home computers have for children? Should parents restrict the amount of time their children spend using the computers?

Home computers are common these days. Parents use computers for gathering information and news, communicating with someone by email and also shopping through Internet. In my opinion, computers have many advantages also for children. However, it is true that there are disadvantages.

Computers are the equipments that children need to learn how to deal with. They are used in almost every workplace for communicating with the clients, making the reports and making the presentations. I think it will be helpful for children to be familiar with computers earlier than ever before.

Computers are equipment that children need to learn how to use, I believe the earlier the better. They are used in almost every workplace for communicating with the clients, making reports and making presentations. I think it will be helpful for children to be familiar with computers as soon as possible.

Computers are used when children learn. There is a lot of software that helps the children to learn while they enjoy. Computers also provide new information through Internet that they can not learn from the old textbooks. Introduction of computers in the education area has changed the way that children learn.

Computers are used to educate children and help them learn various things. There is a lot of software that helps the children to enjoy while they learn. Computers also provide new information through Internet that they can not learn from the old textbooks. Introduction of computers in the education area has changed the way that children study.

There are, however, disadvantages of the home computers. There are many crimes related to the Internet. Children may be involved in such crimes before they notice. There are many websites that provide funny or violent games and children may spend much time enjoying these games and spend less time concentrating on the school works. Parents should tell their children how to use computers, how to avoid the risk they have. And they also restrict the amount of the time children spend and the types of the websites they visit.

There are, however, disadvantages of the home computers. There are many crimes related to the Internet. Children may be involved in such crimes before they realize or notice. There are many websites that provide games that range from fun to violent.Often children may spend much time enjoying these games and spend less time concentrating on the school work. Parents should educate their children on how to use computers, how to avoid any risks. They should also restrict the amount of the time children spend and the types of the websites they visit.

In conclusion, if parents take the measures to avoid the risks, for example, restrict the amount of the time children spend ON the computers, the good points will far outweigh the bad points. Therefore, I agree with the statement that home computers are beneficial for children.

Many people think that there is too much violence on television and that there should be laws controlling the amount and type of violence shown on television programs. Are laws controlling the content of television programs necessary? How much control should there be?

These days, there are many violent programs on television. Many people are concerned about the effects of the violence shown on television on the society. When it comes to the laws which control the content of the programs, they have advantages and disadvantages and remain controversial.

These days, there are many violent programs on television. Many people are concerned about the effects that violence shown on television has on society. When it comes to the laws which control the content of the programs, they have advantages and disadvantages and remain controversial.

Violent programs would cause antisocial behaviors and crimes. Many young people like to watch violent programs. They are actually vulnerable and may confuse the violent scenes of the program and the real world. In fact, there are some crimes that young people kill someone in the public space like street, because of the confusion.

Violent programs can contribute towards antisocial behavior and crimes. Many young people like to watch violent programs. They are actually vulnerable and may confuse the violent scenes of the program with that of the real world. In fact, there are some crimes that young people kill someone in public places that have been said to have been caused by a direct influence of the content of internet information or games.

There are, however, disadvantages of the control by the laws. Firstly, freedom of expression is a fundamental right of human and we should be allowed to make programs we want, unless they make people feel bad. If the laws controlling the contents take effect, they may infringe on the human rights.

There are, however, disadvantages if all internet access is controlled by laws. Firstly, freedom of expression is a fundamental right of human beings and we should be allowed to make any programs we want to a certain extend. Of course , there is some content that should be banned such as extreme violence etc. If laws controlling the contents take effect, they may infringe on human rights.

We have the right to choose the programs. If we do not want to watch the violent programs which may make feel bad, we have only to watch the other programs. We can gather information on the context of the programs from newspapers before we watch.

Also , we have the right to choose the programs we watch. If we do not want to watch violent programs which we disapprove of or make us feel bad, we simply shouldn't watch them. It is possible to gather information on the context of the programs from newspapers before we watch them.

In conclusion, if we investigate the reason why the violent programs make young people violent and become to do antisocial behaviors and take measures to avoid them, the bad points will far outweigh the good points. Therefore, I tend to disagree with the statement that there should be laws which control the content of the programs.

In conclusion, if we investigate the reason why violent programs make young people commit crimes and how they might possibly contribute to antisocial behavior, and take measures to avoid them, then the bad points will far outweigh the good points. Therefore, I tend to disagree with the statement that there should be laws which control the content of the programs.

Art museums should support themselves mainly by charging admission and by receiving donationS from private individuals who are interested in art. That is, museums should receive most of their support from the people who are interested in using them, and not from public funds. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Most of the art museums can not be paid by themselves and are supported by the governments. The notion that they should support themselves mainly by charging admission and by donations is the one that everyone holds. There are advantages and disadvantages.

Most of the art museums function by themselves and are supported by the government. The notion that they should support themselves mainly by charging admission and by donations is the one that everyone holds. There are advantages and disadvantages.

Art museums hold a lot of pictures and scriptures which are very important to the country from the historical perspective. Museums sometimes repair them for their maintenance. It costs a lot of money and the admission fees and donations are not enough for it. The government should support the museum to keep the historical art products of the country.

Art museums hold a lot of pictures,sculptures and other works which are very important to the country from the historical perspective. Museums sometimes must spend money on their upkeep and repairs. It costs a lot of money and the admission fees and donations are not enough to cover the costs. The government should support or at least subsidize the costs in order for the museum to keep the historical art products of the country.

If the government reduces the support, the admission fee will increase. People will not be able to easily go to the museums and enjoy art. And students will have less chance to go there and learn art. Art is very important and should be very close to people, especially to the student who learn art.

If the government reduces the support, the admission fee will increase. People will not be able to easily go to the museums and enjoy art. And students will have less chance to go there and learn about art and at the same time about history or culture of their country. Art is very important and should be very close to people, especially to student who are studying art or art history.

The people who are interested in art and coming there are actually limited. There are some people who are not interested in art and think that the support by the public funds is not fair, because everyone do not use the museums. However, they do not understand the importance of the maintenance of the cultural values and art education.

People who are interested in art and visiting museums are reducing in number, these days. There are some people who are not interested in art and think that the support by the public funds is not fair, because everyone does not use the museums. However, perhaps this because they do not understand the importance maintaining cultural values and art education.

In conclusion, if the government informs people of the need to support the museums and people understand the importance, the bad points will far outweigh the good points. Therefore, I tend to disagree with the above statement.

As the world becomes technologically advanced, computers are replacing more and more jobs. Describe some job position that may be lost because of computers and discuss at least one problem that may result.

Introduction of computers and information technology will change the way in which people work and they do not need to do the jobs which the computers can do anymore. There are some job positions that computers would replace.

Firstly, shops staff may be lost. These days, we can buy anything through the Internet. The products are cheaper than when we buy from shops because of the reduction of the hiring costs. And Internet simultaneously provides the information related to the products, such as prices, the advantages to the competing products. It is very helpful for choosing the products. Shops are changing their styles of selling to the internet shops and shop staff would disappear.

Firstly, retail shop staff may not be necessary in the future. These days, we can buy anything through the Internet. The products are cheaper than when we buy from shops because of the reduction of the cost of hiring shop assistants. And the Internet simultaneously provides the information related to the products, such as prices, the advantages or disadvantages of competing products. It is very helpful for choosing the products. Shops are changing their styles of selling from internet shopping sites and shop staff are slowly reducing.

Secondly, postmen may be lost. E-mail is becoming the easy and convenient way of communication and less and less people write letter on papers nowadays. If the number of letter decreases, the post office would shut the mail service and postmen would disappear.

Secondly, Postal staff are increasingly become less necessary. E-mail is becoming the easy and convenient way of communication and less and less people write letter or send regular mail nowadays. If the number of letters decreases, the post office would eventually shut down the mail service and postmen will no longer be needed to deliver mail.

If shops and post office disappeared, everyone would have less chance to go out to the shopping street or somewhere in the city. Everyone would not get to know each other and the relationship between people in the neighborhood would be lost. This would be the problem for the society and social security.

If shops and post offices disappeared, people would have less reason to leave their houses and go out anywhere in the city. Everyone would have reduced chances of getting to know each other and relationships between people in the neighborhoods would be lost. This would be the problem for the society and social security.

In conclusion, as the computers are becoming widely used and changing the way in which people lead a life, the bad things would happen. Therefore, we should think about what is happening and take measures to cope with the coming problems in advance.

In conclusion, as computers are becoming more widely used and changing the way in which people lead their lives it could lead to anti-social behaviour and cause a rise in crime rates. Therefore, we should think about what is happening and take measures to cope with the possible problems before they occur.

By punishing murderers with the death penalty, society is also guilty of committing murder. Therefore, life in prison is a better punishment for murderers. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Some people think that death penalty is not an adequate way of punishing murderers because the society commits killing. Life in prison is an alternative way of punishment for them. However, it has advantages and disadvantages and still remains controversial.

Some people think that the death penalty is not an adequate way of punishing murderers because the society actually commits the crime of killing a person. Life in prison is an alternative way of punishment for them. However, it has advantages and disadvantages and still remains controversial.

Life in prison helps the people who are innocent, but judged as murderer. Judges do not always make a correct judge. If judges sentence the innocent people to death, it will become a true murder. Actually, there were some cases in which the innocent people were sentenced to death.

Life in prison is beneficial to people who are actually innocent but have been incorrectly sentenced as murderers. Recently it has come to the attention of the media that judges do not always make a correct judgement. If judges sentence an innocent person to death, it in fact becomes a true murder by the public. Actually, there have been some cases reported recently in which the innocent people were sentenced to death. On the other hand if the person is guilty some people may feel it is a waste of the tax payers money.

There are, however, disadvantages of life in prison. Many people think that death penalty can be more effective than life in prison, as a deterrent to the criminals. At least, the murderers to be executed can not commit a murder again. And it will discourage the people who want to kill someone to hesitate.

There are, however, disadvantages of life in prison. Many people think that death penalty can be more effective than life in prison and is a as a deterrent to criminals. At least, the murderers who are sentenced to death, can not commit a murder again. This is said to discourage people who intend to kill someone and maybe rethink their priorities.

And the society is affirming the values of the people killed by the murderer and their family, if the murderer is sentenced to death. The family might think that the society is ignoring us, if he is sentenced to life in prison.

I think that society is affirming the values of the victims and the victims families, if the murderer is sentenced to death. The victims family might think that society is being too lenient and ignoring core values if he is sentenced to only life in prison.

In conclusion, there are some disadvantages of life in prison and most of them are based on people’s feelingS and ways of thinking. I think that the bad points far outweigh the good points right now. Therefore, I tend to disagree with the statement that life in prison is a better punishment for murderers.

More and more people are relying on the private car as their major means of transportation. Describe some of the problem overreliance on cars can cause, and suggest at least one possible solutions.

Many people use the private cars when they travel for going to work, shopping and sightseeing. It is true that driving the private cars is a convenient means of transportation for the most people. However, there are some disadvantages for it.

Firstly, cars are not so efficient, regarding the energy. They use more gasoline for transporting each person than other vehicle like buses and airplanes. Since many people use their own cars, they have become to consume a lot of gasoline and release a lot of carbon oxygen which is a major cause of air pollution and global warming.

Firstly, cars are not so efficient with regard to energy. They use more gasoline to transport a smaller number of people than other vehicles like buses and airplanes. Since many people use their own cars, they consume a lot of gasoline and release a lot of carbon oxygen which is a major cause of air pollution and global warming.

Secondly, cars are not efficient for transportation. Only several people can get in the private cars, while buses can transport more people. Nowadays there are more traffic jams in cities than used to be, since many people drive their own cars.

Secondly, cars are not efficient for transportation due to the fact that they can only hold a few people , while buses can transport several people , thus being more cost efficient . Nowadays there are more traffic jams in cities than their used to be since many people drive their own cars.

Lastly, driving a car may cause metabolic disease like diabetes. We tend not to walk on the street and consume energy, as we use cars when we travel. More and more people are becoming overweight and to have diabetes. Some research showed that as people own more cars, the number of diabetic people increased.

Lastly, relying on driving a car may cause metabolic disease like diabetes. We tend not to walk or exercise as much . More and more people are becoming overweight and are becoming ill with diseases such as diabetes or heart problems. Some research has shown that as more people own cars, the number of diabetic people has increased.

I can suggest a possible solution for these problems. I think that the government should impose more taxes ON gasoline. People WILL tend to avoid driving cars IF they DO NOT NEED TO, if the government decides to do THIS.

In conclusion, in my opinion, there are several bad points for driving the private cars. However, if the government control the ways of transportation, the bad points will be reduced.

In conclusion, in my opinion, there are several bad points for driving the private cars. However, if the government control the taxes on gasoline and provides alternative means of transportation, the bad points will be reduced.

With a continuous drop in the birth rate, it is becoming harder for university and college to dray students. This means they are admitting students into universities more easily, and there is a danger that universities may turn into “leisure land”. More people should be encouraged to obtain a university education. Do you agree or disagree?

As the number of high school students is decreasing, they will have greater opportunities to enter universities than before. And even the students who have enough grades may be able to enter universities. The notion that more people should be encouraged to obtain a university education is the one everyone holds and remains controversial. There are advantages and disadvantages for it.

As the number of high school students is decreasing, they will have greater opportunities to enter universities than before. Even the students who do not have good enough grades may be able to enter universities. The notion that more people should be encouraged to obtain a university education is the one everyone holds and remains controversial. There are advantages and disadvantages for it.

People who graduate from universities will have more chances to earn a lot of money than people who do not graduate from universities. Earning enough money leads to the better life. This is the reason why their parents encourage them to obtain a university degree.

There are, however, some disadvantages for encouraging more students to obtain the university degree. The students who do not have enough grades in high school may not catch up with the university classes and may be able to obtain the grades. As a consequence, they may not be able to obtain the university degree finally. The drop rate would rise.

There are, however, some disadvantages for encouraging more students to obtain the university degree. The students who do not have high enough grades in high school may not be able to keep up in the university classes and may be able to obtain the grades required. As a consequence, they may not be able to obtain a university degree . The fail ( or drop out?) rate would rise.

And universities are the places to offer a high education and can not meet a variety of needs the students have. For example, university can not offer the lesson for the people who wish to learn computer programming or computer graphics. They should go to the specialized schools where they can learn in place of universities.

Although universities are the places to offer a high education, they sometimes do not meet the wide variety of needs the students have. For example, university does not offer courses for people who wish to learn computer programming or computer graphics. They have to go to specialized schools or institutes instead of universities.

In conclusion, universities are not suitable for every student, but they are suitable for students who want to pursue a higher education. Teachers and parents need to help students to decide which school they should enter, depending on the students’ ability and interests. Therefore, I tend to disagree with the above statement.

E mail is the best method for communicating. It is more convenient than the telephone and writing letter on paper. What are your views? What are the merits and demerits of email?

With the advent of computers and Internet, e-mail becomes a common means of communication instead of the telephone and letters. Many people think that e-mail is the best method for communication. However, there are still advantages and disadvantages of e-mail.

The major advantage of e-mail is the speed of communication. Email can be reached to the other person in a minute, even if he is distant. Letters take some days to be reached and take a few weeks, if they are sent to the person overseas.

The major advantage of e-mail is the speed of communication. Email can reach the other person in a very short period of time no matter where the email is being sent in the world. Letters take sometimes take several days or weeks to reach their destination , especially if they are sent overseas.

Another advantage is the convenience. E-mail can be sent from computers. Computers are now everywhere in the offices and at home. And we can easily have an access to them. These days, e-mail can be sent through mobile phones. Most people have mobile phones with them, so they can send e-mail from everywhere.

Another advantage is the convenience. E-mails are usually sent from computers. Computer usage is now available everywhere in most offices and homes and generally the average person can easily have access to them. These days, e-mail can also be sent through mobile phones. Most people own a mobile phones so they can send e-mail from any location.

There are, however, disadvantages of e-mail. E-mail is a simple text message and tends to make people feel nothing. It is sometimes good for business communication, but it is regarded as the disadvantage. On the contrary, telephones and hand writing letters make people feel happy and relieved. Human communication should arouse some emotions and it will help to make the human relationship more strong.

There are, however, disadvantages of e-mail. E-mail is a simple text message and tends to be a little impersonal. It is sometimes good for business communication where emotion is not required. On the contrary, phone calls and hand written letters make people understand the content and true feeling more clearly. Human communication should arouse some emotions in order to make human relationships stronger.

In conclusion, if e-mail can send the voice files or handwriting materials, together with the text message, the good points will far outweigh the bad points. Therefore, I tend to agree with the statement that e-mail is the best method for communicating.

In conclusion, I feel if an e-mail can include a voice files or handwriting materials, which is possible with todays technology, then in this case, the good points will far outweigh the bad points. Therefore, I tend to agree with the statement that e-mail is the best method for communicating.

In order for many young people to contribute to our society, it is worthwhile to make university/college students do volunteer work in order to give credits which are necessary for their degrees. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Some universities give credits when the students engage in the volunteer work in the curriculum. They think it is good for young students to learn not only form the textbook, but also through the social activities. However, it has advantages and disadvantages and they remain controversial.

To learn the idea of contribution to the society is very important for young people. Children do something for themselves, or have something done by their parents. As they are growing up, they have to learn why and how they do something for other people. To include the volunteer work in the curriculum is a good way to give a chance to learn the contribution.

To learn the idea of contribution to society is very important for young people. (Children do something for themselves, or have something done by their parents.!!! do not understand your meaning ?) As they are growing up, they have to learn why and how to do something for other people. To include volunteer work in the curriculum is a good way to give a chance to learn about contributing to society and helping the community or people in need.

To engage in the social activity becomes a good chance to know what the society needs. It CAN EVEN help the students to decide which field they will major in and which job they will do in the future.

There is, however, a disadvantage of making students do the volunteer work in the curriculum. If universities force students to do the volunteer work, the students may not understand the meaning of the contribution to the society. It is because the students do not work voluntarily, but are forced to do. Universities should think of what can be done to make the students to engage in the social activities voluntarily.

There is, however, a disadvantage of making students do volunteer work in the curriculum. If universities force students to do volunteer work, the students may not understand the meaning of the work they are doing and the reason they should help contribute to the society. I my opinion, Universities should think of what can be done to encourage students to engage in social activities voluntarily.

In conclusion, there is a disadvantage of making the student do the volunteer work. If universities make the students to do the social activities voluntarily, the good points will far outweigh the bad points. Therefore, I tend to agree with the statement that universities make the students do volunteer work in the curriculum.

Recently there has been an increase in the number of families where both the husband and wife work. However, women should work less than men in order to take care of their children and do home work. To what extent do you agree and disagree with this opinion?

These days, more and more women are working after having children, but most of them spend less time working than their husbands to take care of their children and do home work. The notion that women should spend less time working than men is not the one everyone holds. It has advantages and disadvantages and remains controversial.

These days, more and more women are working after having children, however, most working mothers spend less time working than their husbands. They still spend more time than the husbands taking care of their children and do housework. The notion that women should spend less time working than men is not the one everyone holds. It has advantages and disadvantages and remains controversial.

Women spend more time taking care of their children. The main reason is the maternity. They have a basic emotion which encourages them to take care of their children.

Women spend more time taking care of their children. The main reason is the sense of maternity. It is a basic emotion which encourages the desire to spend time raising their children.

There are, however, the disadvantages of the notion. Men and women should be equal in the office and at home. Since the laws on the equality of chances have taken effect, more women become working mothers, while more men have a leave from work and stay home to take care of their children and share the house chores with their wives. The systems which support the families with working mothers are establishing. For example, the nursery rooms are now open until late at night. These systems also contribute to an increase in the number of such families.

There are, however, the disadvantages of the notion. Men and women should be equal in the office and at home. Since laws on equal rights between men and women have taken effect, more women become working mothers, while more men take leave from work and stay home to take care of their children and share the household chores with their wives. The systems which support the families with working mothers are continuing to establish. For example, the nursery rooms are now open until late at night. These systems also contribute to an increase in the number of children in such families.

The money which one person earns is not enough to support a family, because the economy is not so stable and the companies do not raise the salary so much. This is one of the reasons why more women work.

The amount of money which one person earns is not enough to support a family, because the economy is not stable enough and companies do not raise the salary so much these days. This is one of the reasons why more women have to work.

In conclusion, when women want to or have to become working mothers, the current government support system will help them and have less trouble becoming working mothers. I think, the bad points far outweigh the good points. Therefore, I tend to disagree with the above statement.

There are many parents who think it is necessary to provide their elementary school children with mobile phone for the sake of convenience and security. Do you support this idea?

As the mobile phones are becoming widely used, many parents give their children mobile phone for the security reasonS. In my opinion, it is necessary to provide their children with mobile phoneS. However, it is true that there are disadvantages and controversy remains.

The main advantage of providing their children with mobile phone is the security. They can keep in touch with their children in an emergency. If they can not contact their children, but mobile phone has GPS system, it will let them know where their children are located and they can go AND help their children.

The second advantage is to help their children to build independence. If their children bring mobile phone, they will permit to let them go out alone. This experience will enhance their children to become independent.

The second advantage is to help their children to build independence. If their children have a mobile phone it will allow them go out alone with a sense of security. This experience will help the children to become more independent.

There are, however, disadvantages of providing their children with mobile phone. Children can send e-mails and get in tough with friends during the class. And also children can play games with mobile phone and keep them entertained. These activities are distracting children from the classes and they will lose marks. Some schools prohibit using the mobile phone in the classes, but others do not limit the use.

There are, however, disadvantages of providing their children with mobile phone. Children can send e-mails and get in touch with friends during the class. Also children can play games with mobile phone and keep themselves entertained. These activities often distracting for children with regards to school and homework activities and they lose focus. Some schools prohibit the use of mobile phone in classes but others do not limit the use.

In conclusion, providing children with mobile phone has many advantages. If the rules are set to limit the use of the mobile phone, the good points will far outweigh the bad points. Therefore, I tend to agree with the statement that it is necessary to provide children with mobile phone.

In some society, stress is now regarded as a major problem and it is thought that people suffer from more stress than they did in the past. However, others feel that the amount of stress people have today is exaggerated. They say that previous generations were under more pressure, but the idea of suffering from stress did not exist. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Some people think that people nowadays suffer more stress than people in the past, but other people think that people in the past suffered more stress. There is no exact measurement of how much stress people suffer. Therefore, there is no exact answer about this problem.

The reason why some people think that people nowadays suffer more stress is because the world is so rapidly changing now that it is very hard for people to catch up with the changes. For example, the technology is advancing and new machines are coming up every year. We have to learn how to use them every time we buy the new machine and it may make people exhausted. However, the social system has been established to support people’s lives and everyone can lead a life above the minimum level set by the government.

The reason why some people think that people nowadays suffer more stress is because the world is so rapidly changing now that it is very hard for people to catch up with the changes. For example, the technology is advancing and new machines and devices are being introduced all the time. We have to learn how to master the latest technology constantly and it may make people exhausted and contribute to stress. However, I believe that our social system, as set by the government , is established to support people’s lives and everyone can lead an above the minimum lifestyle provided they manage their lives effectively by balancing their work and personal life.

The reason why other people think that people in the past suffered more stress is because people in the past were very poor and it was very difficult for most people even to live. There were not enough food to eat and some people starved to death. When the diseases were spread, people can not receive sufficient health service.

The reason why other people think that people in the past suffered more stress is because people in the past were very poor and it was very difficult for most people even to live. There was not enough food to eat and some people even starved to death. When the diseases were spread, people could not receive sufficient health service however these days no one needs to go without food or adequate healthcare. .

In conclusion, the causes of the stress nowadays are different from those in the past. People’s lives nowadays are protected by the government, but people’s lives in the past were not. Therefore, I tend to agree with the idea that people in the past suffered more stress than people nowadays.

The ease of international travel and the spread of various kinds of mass media all over the world have made it more possible than ever for people to know how other people live in other countries. Do the advantages of the development outweigh the disadvantages?

Nowadays, we can easily get to know about the people in other countries through the people who travel abroad and mass media like television and Internet. We often seek this information, because we know it will help us a lot, though it has negative effects on us.

Nowadays, we can easily get to know about the world and other peoples culture countries through people who travel abroad and mass media such as television and Internet. We often seek this information, because we know it will be helpful to us . In some cases, though, it can have negative effects.

The main advantage of knowledge on the people and their lives in other countries is that it helps us to think again of our own life and culture. When we compare the lives between other countries and ours, we will understand the good and bad points of our own lives so that we can adjust our lives in the better way. And also we can understand our own identity and culture and come to think they are important.

The main advantage of knowledge of other people in the world and their lives is that it helps us to think again about our own life and culture. When we compare the lives between other countries and ours, we can understand the good and bad points of our own lives. Consequently,we can adjust our lives for the better and we can understand the importance or our own identity and culture.

Another advantage is to keep our lives safe and stable. Recently, the world is getting smaller and smaller, as people often travel abroad and more products are imported or exported between countries. What is happening in the other countries is directly connected to our lives. For example, if a war happened, many people would get away form their country and seek the refugee. If we know what is happening in that country, we can take the measure to manage the refugee.

Another advantage is that it keeps our lives safe and stable. Recently, the world getting smaller and smaller in respect that people often travel abroad and more products are imported or exported between countries. What is happening in the other countries is directly connected to our lives. For example, if there is a war, people are able to escape the country if need be and seek the refugee. If we know what is happening in that country, we can take measures to deal with the needs of refugees and support the people suffering from the hardships of the war.

There are, however, disadvantages of knowing the people’s lives in other countries. There are many cruel crimes and wars in the world and the violent scenes are always shown on television. Some people may become shocked at these scenes and depressed.

There are, however, disadvantages of knowing about the lives of people in other countries. There are many cruel crimes and wars in the world and the violent scenes are always shown on television. Some people may become shocked at these scenes and this may cause depression.

In conclusion, if people understand the importance of knowing about other people’s lives in other peoples culture and countries, the good points will far outweigh the bad points. Therefore, I tend to agree with the statement that it is necessary to know how people live in other countries.

In some countries today, there is an attitude that anyone can do it in the arts – music, literature, acting, art etc. As a result, people with no talent become rich and famous and genuine talent is not valued or appreciated. Do you agree or disagree?

These days, there are many auditions for musicians and actors which everyone can apply. Some of the winners come to be on television and become famous. It is true that some of these people actually do not have a special background and make everyone feel envy. In my opinion, there are few people who make it in the arts and become rich and famous even if they are not so talented.

These days, there are many auditions for musicians and actors which everyone can apply. Some of the winners become famous through exposure on television and other forms of media. It is true that some of these people actually do not have a special background in the arts and make everyone feel envious of them. In my opinion, there are few people who make it in the arts and become rich and famous if they are not talented.

Most of the auditions now are supported by the mass media like televisions. Mass medias seek something new to keep people attracted and they think the auditions as the suitable places to seek the new people. Winners in such auditions will be introduced by the mass media and have a great opportunity to become famous.

Most of the auditions now are supported by the mass media like television. Mass media is constantly seeking something new to attract new viewers. These above mentioned auditions are suitable places to seek new people. Winners in such auditions are introduced by the mass media and have a great opportunities to become famous.

However, people can know how much talent the artists have. Once they notice that the artists do not have so much talent, they will not support the artists any more. People do not have so many chances to see the products the artist make, if the artist are not on television, but I am sure that people will get to know the good points of the products and appreciate the artists, if the artist are talented.

However, people soon realize the extent of talent the artists have. Once they notice that the artists are not so talented, they quickly no longer support the artists. People do not have so many chances to see the products the artist make, thus if the artist did not have the exposure of media such as television, the public would not be able to become familiar with the good points of the products and appreciate the artists, if the artists are indeed talented.

In conclusion, people can FIND OUT how much talents the artists have when they see the products. They will surely value and appreciate the artists and the artist will become famous and rich. The artists who become famous because of mass media will soon disappear from the shows on television.

In some countries, it can be very difficult for people over the age of 50 to get good jobs, despite their experience. What do you think are the causes of this problem and what measures could be taken to solve it?

It is true that the older people can not easily get good jobs, despite their experiences. Many companies hesitate to hire these people for several reasons. We have to think of why it is difficult for older people to get good jobs and possible measures we should take to solve it.

One of the causes of this problem is the high salary. Older workers tend to be experienced and should be paid enough to meet their experiences. Many companies would hesitate to pay a lot of money, even if they need the skills the older workers have.

Another cause is that many company staffs do not know how to treat the older workers. There are not so many companies which have experienced accepting the older workers. It is natural that people can easily order the younger people to do jobs. The bosses would have in trouble treating the older worker when the company accepts them for the first time, but time will solve this problem.

Another cause is that many company staff do not know how to treat the older workers. There are not so many companies which have experienced accepting older workers. It is natural that senior people usually order the younger people to do jobs. The bosses would have trouble in the way of treating older workers when the company employs them for the first time, but I feel time will solve this problem.

What can be done to solve this problem? I think the main cause of the problem is the financial one. We should ask the government to give financial support to the companies who accept the older workers. In order to ask the government, more and more people need to be informed of the importance of older people entering the workforce at higher level positions.

In conclusion, we should have more discussions and get everyone know the importance of solving the problem. And then we all ask the government to take appropriate measures to support the company financially, only then can more older people easily get good jobs.

In many countries these days, the number of people continuing their education after school has increased, and the range of courses available at universities and colleges has also increased. Do you think this is a positive and negative development?

As the world is getting smaller and technology is advancing, more and more people think they have a lot of things that they need to learn and want to continue to learn even after they finish their school. Universities are offering various courses to working people. It is good to meet their needs. However, there are advantages and disadvantages.

The main advantage of universities offering education courses for working people is the sufficient staffs. Universities have a lot of teaching staffs who are very experienced in teaching and also specialists in their fields. There are some facilities which offer education courses, but they often ask university staffs to give lectures.

The main advantage of universities offering education courses for working people is the highly skilled professors and other staff available. Universities have a lot of members in their faculties who are very experienced in teaching and also specialists in their fields. There are some facilities which offer higher education courses and they often ask university staffs to give lectures.

Another advantage is the increase in the value of the universities. If students become talented and can do more jobs, the society will recognize that they are good universities, leading to the good reputation and increase in their values. As a result, the donations may increase.

There are, however, disadvantages of universities and colleges offering education courses for working people. Universities may owe the financial costs. Actually, the number of working people who want to have lessons is less than that of usual students and universities and colleges need to set higher fee for the working people. These educational courses cost more money for one working student than for one young student.

There are, however, disadvantages of universities and colleges offering education courses for working people. Universities may lose money due to the financial costs for example the teachers salary. Actually, the number of working people who want to have lessons is less than that of usual students and universities and colleges will need to set a higher fee for the working people. These educational courses will cost more money for one working student than for one young student.

In conclusion, if the government gives financial supports to the universities offering the courses for working people, the good points will far outweigh the bad points. Therefore, I think it is a positive development.

Some people regard work as the most important thing in life and have little interest in anything else. Other people are more enthusiastic about their hobbies and leisure interests than their jobs. Discuss both these attitudes and give your own opinion.

There are some people who spend most of the time concentrating on their jobs, while other people think it is more important to enjoy their time doing their hobbies. These two attitudes have both good points and bad points.

For the people who spend most of the time concentrating on their jobs, their job is especially important because it have something interesting to make them concentrating on their jobs, not just a way of making money. They will be satisfied if they complete their jobs and make a good outcome and even promotion. However, they tend to spend less time being with their families and it is hard to build strong family ties. It is also bad that the values of paternity tend to reduce in the family.

Regarding the people who spend most of their time concentrating on their jobs, their job is probably especially important because it has something of interest to them . For them , concentrating on their jobs is not just a way of earning money. They will be satisfied if they complete their jobs and outcome is good and and they are even promoted. However, they tend to spend less time being with their families and it is hard to build strong family ties. It is bad that the value of the spouse and paternal spirit is not so important to them.

For the people who more enthusiastic about their hobbies and leisure interests, their hobbies and leisure interest them more than their jobs. They want to enjoy their lives doing their hobbies and leisure and get satisfaction. However, if they spend too much time doing their hobbies and leisure, they will lose money and can not support their families. And other people may think they are lazy.

There are some people who have more enthusiasm for their hobbies and leisure and this interests them more than their jobs. They get satisfaction enjoying their lives through their hobbies and leisure activities. this is fine to a certain extent ,however, if they spend too much time and do not focus on their jobs enough, they will lose money and will not be able to support their families. Also other people may think they are lazy.

In conclusion, there are good and bad points of both these attitudes. Which attitude people choose depends on their lifestyle and way of thinking. What I want to say is that people should know the bad points of the attitude they choose and make a plan to solve the bad points and avoid their consequences by themselves.