Download - HPCL CSR Social Audit Report
Report on Social Audit of HPCL-CSR Activities: Unnati and Swavalamban
Samapti Guha
Susanta Datta
Zainab Kakal
TISS National CSR Hub School of Management & Labour Studies
Tata Institute of Social Sciences Mumbai
2011
Report on Social Audit of HPCL-CSR Activities: Unnati and Swavalamban
Page | 1
Acknowledgement
The social audit report on Swavalamban and Unnati projects would not have been possible without the
support of different stakeholders of these projects who have contributed directly and indirectly during the
audit process. We are grateful to Tata Institute of Social Sciences for giving us the opportunity to work on
this report. We would like to thank Prof. Sharit Bhowmik, Dean, School of Management and Labour
Studies, TISS for his immense support. We are also thankful to all support staff of School of Management
and Labour Studies and the Accounts Department of TISS.
We would like to thank Ms. Sonal Desai, GM, CSR and Mr. S. S. Sharma, Deputy Manager, and other
personnel of HPCL for their support. Without their support it would not have been possible for us to reach
the external stakeholders of these projects.
All Principals, training staff and other supporting staff of the studied ITI in Maharashtra and ITCs in
Bathinda, Punjab helped us to understand the implementation process during fieldwork and provided
relevant data related to the Swavalamban project. We would like to thank all of them.
We would like to thank Mr. Sougata Roy Chowdhury, Director, Skill and Affirmative Action, CII and
other staff of the same division of CII for providing data of Swavalamban project and connecting us to the
ITCs in Bathinda.
Mr. Manish Singh, Operational Head and Mr. Vikas Malhotra, Consultant of CQ Works Skill Pvt. Ltd.
provided relevant information about the implementation process adopted by CII, CQ Works Skill Pvt. Ltd
for Swavalamban project. We are grateful to them.
We are grateful to the Regional heads and Office managers of NIIT at Dehradun in Uttarakhand, Panipat
in Haryana, Rajamundhary in Andhra Pradesh, and Barasat in West Bengal for their extended cooperation
and enduring support. We also thank HPCL employees for their valuable inputs on the Unnati project and
providing data for the same project. We would also extend a warm thanks to the Head Masters, teachers
and students of each school who contributed magnanimously to our study with their comments and
insights.
SG, SD and ZK.
Report on Social Audit of HPCL-CSR Activities: Unnati and Swavalamban
Page | 2
Abbreviation
BIMT Bathinda Institute of Management & Technology
CII Confederation of Indian Industries
CSR Corporate Social Responsibility
DEO District Education Officer
FGD Focused Group Discussion
FY Financial Year
GOI Government of India
GM General Manager
HPCL Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited
ITI Industrial Training Institute
ITC Industrial Training Center
MES Modular Employable Schemes
MGNREGA Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act
MOU memorandum of understanding
MS Excel. Microsoft Excel
NGO Non Government Organization
NIIT National Institute of Information Technology
PRES Pravara Rural Educational Society
PSU Public Sector Undertaking
SA Social Audit
SWOT Strength Weakness Opportunity Threats
TISS Tata Institute of Social Sciences
UK United Kingdom
VTP Vocational Training Providers
Report on Social Audit of HPCL-CSR Activities: Unnati and Swavalamban
Page | 3
Contents
Acknowledgement ........................................................................................................................................ 1 Abbreviation ................................................................................................................................................. 2 Chapter 1 ....................................................................................................................................................... 5 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 5
1.1 Background: ........................................................................................................................................ 5 1.2 Objectives of Social Audit .................................................................................................................. 6 1.3 Scope of Social Audit ......................................................................................................................... 6 1.4 Methodology ....................................................................................................................................... 7
� Unnati ............................................................................................................................................ 7 � Swavalamban ................................................................................................................................ 7
1.5 Outlines of the chapters/ reports ......................................................................................................... 8 Chapter 2 ....................................................................................................................................................... 9 UNNATI ....................................................................................................................................................... 9
2.1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 9 2.1.1 Unnati ........................................................................................................................................... 9 2.1.2 Project Description ....................................................................................................................... 9 2.1.3 Rationale / Objectives of the project .......................................................................................... 10
2.2 Social Audit ...................................................................................................................................... 10 2.2.1 Governance Statement ............................................................................................................... 10 2.2.2 As-is Analysis ............................................................................................................................ 11
Table 2.1: As-is Analysis ............................................................................................................ 11 Table 2.2: Quality check Matrix for internal stakeholder ........................................................... 13
2.2.3 Stakeholder Mapping ................................................................................................................. 14 2.2.4 Stakeholder Analysis.................................................................................................................. 14
2.2.4.1 NIIT ..................................................................................................................................... 14 2.2.4.2 School Management ............................................................................................................ 15 2.2.4.3 Students ............................................................................................................................... 16 2.2.4.4 NIIT local trainers ............................................................................................................... 16 2.2.4.5 HPCL Officers .................................................................................................................... 17
Table 2.3: Quality check Matrix for external stakeholders ......................................................... 18 2.3. Social Accounting: Key issues ......................................................................................................... 18
Chapter 3 ..................................................................................................................................................... 24 SWAVALAMBAN ..................................................................................................................................... 24
3.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 24 3.1.1 Swavalamban ............................................................................................................................. 24 3.1.2 Project Description ..................................................................................................................... 24 3.1.3 Rationale .................................................................................................................................... 25 3.1.4 Objectives .................................................................................................................................. 25
Report on Social Audit of HPCL-CSR Activities: Unnati and Swavalamban
Page | 4
3.2. Social Audit ..................................................................................................................................... 26 3.2.1 Governance Statement ............................................................................................................... 26
3.2.1.1 Governance Statement between HPCL and CII .................................................................. 26 3.2.1.2 Governance Statement between Assessment Partner and CII ............................................. 28
3.2.1.2.1 City & Guild (Phase I – III) ......................................................................................... 28 3.2.1.2.2 Sona Skills (Phase IV) ................................................................................................. 29 3.2.1.2.3 CQ Works Skills Services Pvt Ltd (Phase V) .............................................................. 29
3.2.1.3: Governance Statement between Training Partner and CII ................................................. 29 3.2.2 Stakeholder Mapping ................................................................................................................. 30
3.2.2.1Structure of the Team ........................................................................................................... 31 Table 3.1: Stakeholders under Swavalamban ............................................................................. 31
3.2.3 Stakeholder Analysis.................................................................................................................. 31 3.2.3.1 Confederation of Indian Industries (CII) ............................................................................. 31 3.2.3.2 City and Guild ..................................................................................................................... 33 3.2.3.3 CQ Works Skills Services Pvt Ltd ...................................................................................... 33 3.2.3.4 Training Centers .................................................................................................................. 34
3.2.3.4.1 Industrial Training Institute (ITI), Lone ....................................................................... 34 Figure 3.1: Status of Passed out Students of ITI, Lone ........................................................... 35
3.2.3.4.2 Baba Farid ITI, Bathinda Punjab ................................................................................. 36 Figure 3.2: Status of Passed out Students of Baba Farid ITI, Bathinda, Punjab ..................... 36
3.2.3.4.3 Bathinda Institute of Management and Technology (BIMT) ....................................... 37 Figure 3.3: Status of Passed out Students of BIMT, Bathinda, Punjab ................................... 38
3.2.4 As-is Analysis ............................................................................................................................ 40 Table 3.1 As-is Analysis of different stakeholders ..................................................................... 40 Table 3.2: Quality check matrix for all stakeholders .................................................................. 44
3.3. Social Accounting: Key issues ......................................................................................................... 46 Chapter 4 ..................................................................................................................................................... 49 RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................................................ 49
4.1 UNNATI ........................................................................................................................................... 49 4.2 SWAVALAMBAN ........................................................................................................................... 50 4.3 Alternative model for implementation .............................................................................................. 52
4.3.1 UNNATI .................................................................................................................................... 52 Figure 4.1: Alternative model for implementation of “Unnati” .................................................. 52
4.3.2 SWAVALAMBAN .................................................................................................................... 53 Figure 4.2: Alternative model for implementation of “Swavalamban” ...................................... 54
Report on Social Audit of HPCL-CSR Activities: Unnati and Swavalamban
Page | 5
Chapter 1
Introduction
1.1 Background:
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited (HPCL) is a Fortune 500 PSU engaged in exploration,
production and distribution of petroleum products across the country. The Company aspires to take up
leading role in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) as this company believes CSR connects
businesses to society and helps them to participate in overall development of the nation. HPCL has
already implemented two projects "Unnati" and "Swavalamban" in different States in India. Tata Institute
of Social Sciences (TISS) strongly believes that implementation of these two projects is not the end of
CSR. To understand the impact of these projects, HPCL has engaged expert like TISS to carry out Social
Audit of these projects. In this context TISS team is submitting the final report on Social Audit of
“Unnati” and “Swavalamban” projects to HPCL.
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) activities of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited (HPCL)
have been initiated since 1985. The purpose of HPCL CSR activities, which was taken from its VISION
and MISSION statement, is stated as follows:
a) “Serving the community is the purpose of our business.
b) Ensuring sustainable business process – financially, environmentally and socially, is our effort.
c) Using core competence, expertise and technology of our business to reach the common people,
especially the underprivileged, is our aim.
d) Developing capacity in the community is our strategy.
e) Enhancing human excellence and improving quality of life is our endeavor.” (Source: Bringing
Smiles 2009-10, HPCL)
According to CSR statement of purpose of HPCL, it is clearly stated as “HPCL’s CSR model has been
based on “Creating Shared Value”. The shared value model is based on the concept that corporate success
and social welfare are interdependent. A business needs a healthy, educated workforce, sustainable
resources and adept government to compete effectively. For society to thrive, profitable and be
competitive, businesses must be developed and supported to create income, wealth, tax revenues, and
opportunities for philanthropy and sustainability”
Report on Social Audit of HPCL-CSR Activities: Unnati and Swavalamban
Page | 6
Generally HPCL funded two types of CSR activities: one is project at corporate level, another is project at
field level. While corporate projects follow a top down approach, decided by HPCL top authority and
implemented to the field level with the help of implementing agencies, field level projects follow a
bottom up approach and are based on short term needs. Previously they have followed field level projects
as part of their CSR activities and covered more than hundred field level projects. From 2005-06 onwards,
the plan of CSR programme activities has been initiated at corporate level and HPCL has appointed
“Organization Dynamics”, a consultancy company, to conduct the baseline study. Accordingly, after
completing all the baseline study, as per requirement of HPCL, they have submitted a detailed report to
HPCL. That report is one of the guiding sticks of HPCL’s present CSR programme. On the basis of their
recommendations, HPCL has initiated seven full-fledged corporate projects. Two of these projects are
Swavalamban, and Unnati.
1.2 Objectives of Social Audit
Social Audit (SA) enables organizations to explore and generate their own values. SA provides a
coherent and clear image of HPCL and helps this organization to plan and execute their CSR
activities in a transparent and fair way.
It helps the organization to understand how each of the stakeholders of these projects has met the
assigned responsibilities.
SA helps HPCL to assess the capabilities of the implementing agencies and accordingly, the
organization can identify the plan its future CSR projects.
SA creates a new level of participative democracy focused on values and long term visions and in the
process makes HPCL transparent to stakeholders and supporters.
1.3 Scope of Social Audit
The social audit is a transparent process and documentation conducted to measure and manages the social
objectives of both Unnati and Swavalamban programme. It is geared to provide better governance
systems for any organization. The social audit is expected to deliver mechanisms by which HPCL can
identify inconsistencies between its aims and the final implementation of both Unnati and Swavalamban
programme. Using the audit report, HPCL can develop high levels of detailing in what they wish to
measure and verify and which will be appropriate to the needs of the organization as well as other
stakeholders. The audit will also aid HPCL to understand the current impact and limitations to impact. In
addition, it will provide HPCL a multi-stakeholder perception of its programme and help in formulation
of future CSR policies. Post the audit, HPCL can ensure greater verifiability of data and accountability
for the programme internally.
Report on Social Audit of HPCL-CSR Activities: Unnati and Swavalamban
Page | 7
1.4 Methodology
Unnati
Participative methods have been employed to engage stakeholders. The nature of the data is qualitative.
As it is a multi-stakeholder study, multiple research tools have been adopted. For the data collection
multistage sampling technique has been adopted. In the first stage, data has been collected from HPCL
through interview and focus group discussion. In the second stage stratified sampling technique has been
adopted to select the NIIT branch offices from four states for data collection regarding implementation of
Unnati. In the last stage, schools have been selected to collect the data from school students and teachers
through interview and focus group discussion. For interviews, semi-structured questionnaire has been
designed. The questions are based on the background, development, current conditions, and overall
implementation of the project. Even the environmental interactions of one or more individuals, groups,
communities, businesses or institutions involved in the projects have been studied.
Swavalamban
For the data collection, multistage sampling technique has been adopted. In the first stage, data has been
collected from HPCL, CII through structured interview and focus group discussion. In the second stage,
three training centers, Industrial Training Institute (ITI), Lone, Maharashtra; Baba Farid ITI, Bathinda,
Punjab and Bathinda Institute of Management & Technology (BIMT) have been selected on the basis of
their actual coverage in terms of number of passed out students over the last five phases. During the field
visit, we have conducted interviews with the principal of the training centers, organized Focused Group
Discussion (FGD) among the teachers about their perception about the programme, challenges they faced
and their suggestions to improve the programme. In the third stage, random sampling technique has been
adopted to select student beneficiaries to conduct the social audit. We have also collected data from both
the current students and passed out students by using semi structured questionnaire. We asked the
students about their perception of the programme, expectation after completion of training, future interest,
their problems and challenges during training and their suggestions for improvement of the programme.
In case of passed out students, the emphasis is given on their perception about the benefit of the
programme in terms of employment and increase in income.
Report on Social Audit of HPCL-CSR Activities: Unnati and Swavalamban
Page | 8
1.5 Outlines of the chapters/ reports
This report consists of four chapters. First chapter gives an overall idea about the scope of social audit for
HPCL CSR projects. The objective of this social audit is to judge whether a balance has been maintained
between the stated targets and achievements of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) activities of
HPCL. To do this, we need to check whether there exists any gap in the implementation processes with
reference to governance statement and also check the level of inconsistency exists in the delivery process.
The second and third chapters provide a proper social audit framework for project Unnati and
Swavalamban respectively. In both chapters, we provide governance statement of each stakeholder,
stakeholder’s mappings, stakeholder’s analysis with the help of inconsistency checking and quality check
matrix analysis. We discuss all key issues emerge from social accounting framework for both the projects
Unnati and Swavalamban. Finally chapter four provides recommendations and suggests alternative
models for implementation of Unnati and Swavalamban separately with a notion of running both projects
for long term sustenance basis.
Report on Social Audit of HPCL-CSR Activities: Unnati and Swavalamban
Page | 9
Chapter 2
UNNATI
2.1. Introduction
2.1.1 Unnati
The Unnati programme has been one of the flagship programmes of HPCL’s Corporate Social
Responsibility vision. While it began as a regional project, it grew to a national scale and has been
executed so since 2009. This year, HPCL along with NIIT, trained 4000 students across India’s urban,
rural and semi-urban centers where HPCL operates. While the pilot project was conceived and conducted
in Andhra Pradesh, in 2010, the Unnati programme spread to the northern regions covering 10 states, 12
towns and 14 schools. HPCL has developed a partnership with NIIT for the implementation of the
programme. While NIIT is in charge of the courseware and the training, HPCL funds and supports the
programme.
2.1.2 Project Description
Unnati is a joint execution of HPCL and NIIT and it has specific roles and responsibilities for both the
stakeholders. While NIIT chooses the schools, HPCL makes the final selection. The schools are chosen
based on three criteria:
- The school should not have had any prior access to or training for computers.
- The school must serve the poorest of the poor.
- The school should be in a location decided by HPCL.
Once, the school is chosen and agrees to participate, the training is carried out by NIIT staff. The
courseware is distributed, regular tests are carried out and classes are organized in coordination with the
school principal and the school timings. HPCL local officers are appointed by the HPCL head office to
monitor the programme. These officers are required to make surprise visits and examine the progress on a
regular basis. The important measure is that the students should be learning. At the end of the programme,
a final examination is carried out by the NIIT staff in presence of HPCL officers and based on the results,
students are awarded with certificates. HPCL donates a number of computers to each school for the
further use and practice.
Report on Social Audit of HPCL-CSR Activities: Unnati and Swavalamban
Page | 10
2.1.3 Rationale / Objectives of the project
The programme was formulated to fill the existing gap created by the lack of access to computer
education in schools for students in high school moving to college education. The Unnati programme
aims to provide basic computer skills and education to school children from selected schools. The
programme aims to result in increased employability and raised self esteem among students.
2.2 Social Audit
2.2.1 Governance Statement
HPCL is a Fortune 500 company, with an annual turnover of Rs. 1,08,599 Crores and sales/income from
operations of Rs 1,14,889 Crores (US$ 25,306 Millions) during FY 2009-10, having about 20%
Marketing share in India and a strong market infrastructure.
The Unnati programme was conceived in order to develop knowledge about computers for students of
economically backward schools so that they are at par with other mainstream school students when they
reach high school. The schools were chosen by HPCL in areas where they had their centers so that the
monitoring of the programme would be easier and the local environment in which HPCL existed would
profit from the initiative.
HPCL currently has not articulated the vision or mission of the Unnati programme.
This lack of mission and vision for Unnati programme has led to the ultimate absence of strategic
planning for the coming years and focus on solely medium-term and short-term objectives. This approach
has deterred the overall potential impact of the programme. Recognized problems and issues have also
unfortunately not been solved and hence, an incremental slope that should have ideally been observed in
the programme is missing. However, it has clearly expressed the internal rules guiding how the project
will be executed. Many of those rules are considered to be functional guidelines and have led to the
programme execution to be vague and inconsistent with the prescribed regulations.
The MOU also lists many potential problem areas. It calls for detail and feedback mechanisms to ensure
that the programme is effectively executed. However, the same MOU also mentions that none of the
statements are binding on the parties.
Report on Social Audit of HPCL-CSR Activities: Unnati and Swavalamban
Page | 11
Additionally, there is a lack of motivation and passion from the HPCL employees. Their approach to their
duties towards Unnati displays their minimal comprehension of the programme and its ultimate aims.
This is also due to the lack of the articulation and marketing of HPCL’s CSR vision and mission
internally within the organization. The overall mission and vision of HPCL as an organization does not
mention stakeholders other than the employees and customers and hence does not aid their social aims.
Most importantly, there exists a requirement of a social value base across the organization regarding the
social purpose of HPCL - i.e. the social objectives of HPCL have a top-down approach resulting in lack of
participation of employees and other stakeholders and lack of further innovation. This top-down approach
also weakens the programme due to lack of adequate and appropriate feedback from HPCL personnel
who is based on the field. In one case the local HPCL office was completely unaware of their required
participation in the project. In other cases, the offices interpreted their participation on their own means.
On the positive side, HPCL has a strong hold on accountability. It lays great emphasis on documentation
and monitoring. However, the efficacy and efficiency of the monitoring process suffers due to the innate
lack of consensus orientation and participation from the employees and other stakeholders. It also leads to
compromising on transparency and accountability issues which HPCL and NIIT both uphold.
2.2.2 As-is Analysis
Table 2.1: As-is Analysis
No. Objective/ Rule Inconsistency Comments 1. NIIT will chose schools
locations as decided by HPCL
- Personal connections of NIIT and HPCL employees play an important role in influencing the final decision
- Urban schools may be chosen by NIIT/HPCL for ensuring easy success
NIIT’s competence is not in choosing schools and hence, this aspect has greatly suffered
2. The training will be minimum 40 hours duration for each student with 6-days classes per week, at least once per week for each student in each standard
This has not been implemented due to the available school hours, lack of school infrastructure, the structure of the school curriculum and problems with intermittent electricity
As per NIIT, In some areas, there was no electricity available all day and hence, it was absolutely impossible to implement the programme successfully.
3. During the training period, minimum 3 tests will be conducted in order to gauge the effectiveness of the training
Tests have not been conducted at various centers due to the lack of adequate hours and urgency to finish the programme
In many cases, test answers were provided to students by NIIT.
Report on Social Audit of HPCL-CSR Activities: Unnati and Swavalamban
Page | 12
No. Objective/ Rule Inconsistency Comments 4. During the duration of the
training, the adequate number of computers (approximately 10 computers for every 200 students) will be installed in each school so that the students can continue to practice in their leisure time
The number of computers installed was much less than the students due to the lack of infrastructure in the schools. On an average 2-5 students would use the computer at any time
The computers were not made available without a trainer during leisure time and the school did not want to provide the computers to the students in the absence of the trainer
5. After the computer training is over, a test will be conducted in the presence of a HPCL officer to ascertain the effectiveness of the training/learning
HPCL officers did not make their presence at the school during the tests due to the long hours of the tests and the unplanned nature of the same
Some HPCL officers were not even aware of this requirement.
6. Certificates will be given to only those students whose attendance is minimum 60% and who have passed in at-least two written tests
All tests were not conducted. In some schools, no test other than the final examination was conducted. Certificates were given to all students in most cases.
7. Entire course curriculum should be prepared in English/Hindi as per the suitability
The final exam was conducted on software in English even for Hindi speaking students. In areas like Rajmundhary and Barasat, courseware in Hindi could not be read by students.
8. Course content includes usage of Internet and Email
Neither was taught in both the schools visited
In some cases, NIIT said that it was not within their agreement to have taught Internet and Email.
9. Each student will be given his respective courseware
Students did not receive courseware till the end of the course
Due to the inability to find a suitable school, it was decided to teach the 10th standard students of the school. Books for these students could not be arranged for till the last minute.
10. HPCL had to arrange to enablement of internet connectivity at the training locations
There was no internet connectivity available such that the internet module that was to be taught to the students was completely ignored
In some cases, interested local NIIT officers used their phones to show what internet was and could do
11. All students of the class will be trained
Selected students were trained in schools to ensure they did not cross the pre-determined number
These numbers were often chosen by the school. Often the brightest students would be picked.
12. School had to be in charge of infrastructure and electricity
Most schools selected did not have access to suitable infrastructure and did not want to pay for a generator
HPCL in Rajmundhary claimed to have paid the electricity costs.
Report on Social Audit of HPCL-CSR Activities: Unnati and Swavalamban
Page | 13
Based on the above inconsistencies, the following quality check matrix has been created. This matrix
highlights the degree of inconsistency and provides pointers for further deliberation.
Table 2.2: Quality check Matrix for internal stakeholder
Quality criteria Scoring Categories Not
Applicable Fully Fairly Hardly Not at all
Is there a relevant governance statement that describes the CSR programme of HPCL?
x x X x √
Are the programme rules clearly listed?
x x √ x X
Are the programme rules covering every aspect of the planning?
x x X √ X
Did stakeholders participate in creating the governance statement?
X x X x √
Are problems or lack of information identified as one of the objectives?
X x X √ x
Are the values of the programme clearly stated?
x x X √ x
The Quality matrix check clearly highlights some critical issues. The programme is in dire need of a
vision and mission statement. A governance statement can emerge out of the same. A well developed
plan is extremely essential to ensure systematic implementation of the programme at the nationwide scale.
For any socially-oriented programme, it is pertinent that the stakeholders are continually engaged and
involved in the planning process. There is absolutely minimal stakeholder involvement in the planning
and execution. The next section on stakeholder mapping will better define the current stakeholder
engagement.
Report on Social Audit of HPCL-CSR Activities: Unnati and Swavalamban
Page | 14
2.2.3 Stakeholder Mapping
Stakeholders form an important component of every social audit and it is important to identify and
understand the level of interest and power of each stakeholder. For the Unnati programme, there exists
multiple stakeholders – primary as well as secondary.
The primary stakeholders include:
- HPCL
- NIIT
- School Management
- Students
The secondary stakeholders include:
- District Education Officer
- NIIT local trainers
- HPCL local officers
2.2.4 Stakeholder Analysis
While it is clear that there exists a serious lack of communication within HPCL, this section will focus
mostly on external stakeholders. Stakeholders play an important and significant role in the success of any
programme. A positive stakeholder relationship also signifies a higher value base for the programme and
increases overall integrity of the programme.
2.2.4.1 NIIT
- Perception
While NIIT is a joint partner and is in charge of the execution of the programme, it views HPCL critically
and skeptically. NIIT is the sole executioner of the programme while it is HPCL that makes all key
decisions. This equation has strained their relationship and NIIT views HPCL as a demanding yet not
collaborative partner. For example, the NIIT offices reported that the local HPCL office only connects
with the local NIIT office when issues regarding the project come up and demand accountability for the
same. NIIT feels they are at the receiving end of every problem and do not get their due. Also, there is a
common feeling that the local HPCL office is only the monitoring and funding agency that steps in at
their terms and is not fully corporative and supportive during the implementation. NIIT finds it difficult to
deal with operational problems of which they are many and requires HPCL’s support in solving some
critical problems which are beyond their control. NIIT feels that they are at HPCL’s disposal and behave
like an agency employed by HPCL more than a collaborator.
Report on Social Audit of HPCL-CSR Activities: Unnati and Swavalamban
Page | 15
- Implementation
NIIT believes that HPCL needs to be more sensitive of the needs of the programme and alter it so as to
systemize it and ensure effective implementation and overall success. NIIT has had difficulties in trying
to find the most fitting school. Once, the school is found and agrees on the implementation of the
programme, it often lacks suitable infrastructure and this often results in bad management of computers.
E.g. Dripping ceiling during rains and recurring power failures have destroyed computing devices. This
could also possibly be due to use of old equipment by NIIT.
- Achievement
NIIT is not convinced that the programme is achieving much. According to them, because the students
belong to lower sections of the society, they do not have the ability to grasp concepts easily and the
training is wasted on most of the students. Also in the current environment and the method in which it is
being implemented, it cannot have many in-depth effects. NIIT believes that even if the programme does
not satisfy any other stakeholders, it definitely gratifies the students.
2.2.4.2 School Management
- Perception
The school views the Unnati programme as either an additional responsibility or a productive opportunity
depending on the School Management. While most public schools do not have much incentive to take up
the programme because of the lack of infrastructure and support available, some proactive schools use
Unnati to gain the support of HPCL and give their school students leverage. Schools are aware of the
importance of such training and encourage students and NIIT/HPCL to continue the classes at a higher
level and include more students so that the students can maximize their learning and every student in the
school has the opportunity to learn.
- Implementation
Once the infrastructure is provided, the school needs to communicate with NIIT for the proper execution.
If the school leadership is active, it results in the monitoring of the programme internally such that the
monitoring by HPCL is completely rendered useless and unnecessary. The school plays an extremely
important role in order to ensure the success of the programme. Schools where Unnati has been a massive
success had to modify their regular time-tables and school hours and continually connect with NIIT on a
daily basis. In case of inactive leadership, the programme happened on its own pace often stretching to 5-
6 months and classes being irregular and ill-equipped.
Report on Social Audit of HPCL-CSR Activities: Unnati and Swavalamban
Page | 16
- Achievement
Though the school management is appreciative of the programme, it feels that the programme needs to
continue for the next batch of students in addition to a higher level of computer training for the current
students. While some forward looking schools have considered options for using the donated computer
efficiently, for other schools, they are just another accessory and they have no plans for using them or
maintaining them.
2.2.4.3 Students
- Perception
The students view the programme very positively. They are happy with NIIT and its trainers. They view it
as an important achievement for themselves. They do not realize the overall implication of learning or the
necessity of the same. They were just interested in the more glamorous programmes like Paint and did not
see much need of studying MS Excel.
- Implementation
Though the students were satisfied with the training in spite of its gaps, they were deeply frustrated with
the computers which did not function or continued to get spoilt repeatedly. They were unhappy that at
most times, the equipment was broken. At all times, either one of the parts of the computer was not
functioning which rendered it useless during class.
- Achievement
The students believe that they learnt a lot and are always awaiting a chance to practice. They know that
the knowledge of the computers is essential for them. They are thankful that they had the opportunity to
learn the computer. However, they are not aware of the importance of what they are learning. Some also
feel that they are not getting the best of the programme and training because they are poor.
2.2.4.4 NIIT local trainers
- Perception
NIIT local trainers were either NIIT students who were in higher training or regular trainers. This would
depend on location of the school. They viewed the classes as another chore or responsibility.
- Implementation
The trainers found it immensely difficult to train students. They had to modify the modules often to make
the students understand better. In many cases, when the infrastructure did not allow it, the trainers used
Report on Social Audit of HPCL-CSR Activities: Unnati and Swavalamban
Page | 17
available equipment resourcefully to teach the students. Also, because the students belonged to poor
households, they believed that the students used the equipment in a rougher fashion which resulted in
breaking down of equipment on a much more regular basis and sooner than otherwise.
- Achievement
The trainers do not view the programme to be or become a successful one. It has too many lose gaps
which they take care of on their own and it cannot be possibly a sustainable effort from their side. They
also retort that though the students are learning, they shall soon forget if they do not practice. Also, in the
absence of maintenance for the computers, they are sure to get spoilt very soon. The programme is
viewed to be a token effort without far-reaching impacts.
2.2.4.5 HPCL Officers
- Perception
The HPCL officers view the programme as another official deliverable. They are willing to do what is
necessary and conveyed to them from the Head Office but have not involved themselves completely even
if they are aware of some drawbacks and issues.
- Implementation
The HPCL officers made weekly/fortnightly trips to the schools to monitor the programme. Often, more
than one officer was involved in the monitoring. Monitoring involved asking the students questions about
what they learned and checking with them and the school management ensuring the smooth function of
the programme. There is no standard monitoring or reporting process and each officer does it in his own
way. When the Head Office insists, emails about the progress and current status are sent accordingly.
- Achievement
The HPCL officers view the programme as something good that HPCL is doing at the side. They see
themselves as benevolent do-gooders. They believe that considering the social and economic situation of
the students, the programme is a huge advancement for them.
Report on Social Audit of HPCL-CSR Activities: Unnati and Swavalamban
Page | 18
Table 2.3: Quality check Matrix for external stakeholders
Quality criteria Scoring Categories Not
Applicable Fully Fairly Hardly Not at all
Do the stakeholders know about the organization?
X √ X x X
Are the stakeholders clearly defined?
X √ X x X
Is there effective dialogue among stakeholders?
X X X √ X
Did stakeholders participate in creation of the programme?
X X X x √
Are stakeholders satisfied with the programme?
X X √ x x
Are stakeholders appropriately involved in the execution of the programme?
X X √ x x
2.3. Social Accounting: Key issues
- Top down Approach of programme planning and execution
The programme seems to be based on a variety of assumptions. They range from - schools need the
programme and will easily consent for the realization of the programme to the very belief that schools
will maintain these computers so high school students can actually practice and remember these skills
when they move to college. As per the programme, the selected school must not have any computer
access at all. In most states, government’s education programme allows for computer distribution and
access to schools. In this circumstance, it becomes close to impossible to find a school where there are no
computers resulting in forged data for school selection.
While this is one example, due to inept inadequacies in the planning, an element of deception has entered
the project which was completely avoidable.
Report on Social Audit of HPCL-CSR Activities: Unnati and Swavalamban
Page | 19
- Lack of infrastructure in schools
This has been a common issue for most schools as schools do not have the current capacity required to set
up a lab of 10 computers for students. This requires electrical components as well as space. In some cases,
where space was provided, walls and ceilings would drip during monsoons harming the computers. The
computers would often not work due to either provision of bad computers by NIIT or bad maintenance by
the schools. According to NIIT, another reason was that the poor students could not use them properly
and rendered them spoilt. In the case of Rajmundhary, there was a security problem as the area where the
school was located for perceptible to robbery and there was always a threat that the computers could get
stolen or destroyed by vandals. In Panipat, the space provided for the computer class was extremely small
hardly fitting 6-7 computers. This resulted in 5-6 students sitting together and working. This also gave
each student 5 minutes of working time on the computer which is not enough time to practice what they
have learnt.
- Changing methodology used by NIIT
NIIT changed its teaching methodology at various centers. At Barasat, few students, chosen by the school
authority, were trained and they taught the other students. At Dehradun, two trainers divided the class in
groups and taught each groups of students individually. While this difference in methodology was due to
the location constraints on occasion, in general this difference was avoidable. The change in methodology
has also caused changes in overall impact and monitoring.
- Use of computers during extra time
Though the lab was intended to be available for students for additional practice, in most cases it was not
utilized. Many of the students stayed away from the school and would leave immediately. In one case, the
lab could not be kept open for the students till later because of security issues. In most cases, due to
infrastructure problems, the labs were used for most of the day and there was no time for extra practice.
- Lack of electricity
Many chosen locations had electricity problems and due to the lack of generators, the machines would
often get spoilt and classes were difficult to conduct. As mentioned before, in this situation, it was
difficult to understand which stakeholder would bear the cost of the generator or any other equipment
required to be used for conducting the class. This was especially so, since, HPCL chose the locations and
the schools and NIIT was the implementing partner. Putting in a backup system on computers was also
expensive for NIIT. Data would often be lost due to intermittent electricity and the computers will also be
rendered useless at many times after too many electrical cuts.
Report on Social Audit of HPCL-CSR Activities: Unnati and Swavalamban
Page | 20
- Lack of incentives for School Management
School managements who play the primary role in ensuring the success of the programme currently have
no incentives to play an effective role in the implementation of Unnati. There exists no motivation
towards devoting time or effort for the successful execution of the programme. It is falsely assumed that
the School management will be eager to take up this programme because it helps the students and is
conducted as charity. In many cases, NIIT has reported that schools have not shown interest in
implementing the programme as it does not fall under the purview of their work. In addition, most of the
schools have lack of staff and infrastructure and do not want to get an added workload that will come
from implementing the programme. If Unnati aims to be a sustainable programme, it needs to motivate
the school management and its HPCL officers and provide adequate incentives for the schools which are
participating in the programme.
- Success criteria not clear
After the programme was envisioned, there have been no clear evaluation criteria for the social impact.
Key indicators to monitor the impact were developed but the overall social impact was not taken into
consideration. This has resulted in the limited reach and accomplishment of the programme. The NIIT
staff considered the programme successful because the students were happy with learning computers. The
school considered it a success if all students attended and received certificated and the school received the
donated computers. While it is obvious that each stakeholder has his own internet and motivations, the
lack of an overall criteria or indicator system has deflated the expected impact. For example, NIIT’s
measure of their success based on fulfilling the student’s expectation, very often was a way for them, to
move away from their original responsibility which is to teach the students effectively. Especially because
they became lax on effective training by assuming the students came from an impoverished background
and hence, could only learn a bit and were incapable of understanding and grasping everything. Also,
because the students were very often using the computers for the first time, they were satisfied with little
they learnt and were happy just operating on ‘Paint’. In general, the programme has been poorly
developed and hence has generated several implementation issues and delivered little impact.
- Review of roles and responsibilities of stakeholders
There is asymmetry of information and expectations within stakeholders. While there is wide consensus
of the inputs the school is supposed to bring to the programme, there are also exceptions. For example,
the school is expected to provide the infrastructure but cannot ensure the electricity. NIIT expects the
school or HPCL to get a generator. The school accepts HPCL or NIIT to arrange for it. This causes much
Report on Social Audit of HPCL-CSR Activities: Unnati and Swavalamban
Page | 21
confusion and is potentially damaging for long-term alliances. The current roles and duties need to be
reinterpreted and enforced for better implementation and understanding of Unnati.
- Lack of NIIT Faculty
In remote locations, NIIT has faced problems of securing faculty. In particular areas where the schools
were far away from the NIIT centers, continued faculty engagement was difficult as the trainers would
not be willing to travel to the school on a daily basis. It is also difficult to manage this faculty as they are
expected to work with a rural group that they are not previously acquainted with. In some cases, for
example, at the Rajamundhry office, the faculty was contracted solely for this project. At the Dehradun
office, young trainees studying at NIIT were working as trainers at the schools.
- Lack of rural/semi-rural perspective on education and training
None of the main stakeholders NIIT or HPCL have any expertise in understanding the current landscape
of education and training in the rural and semi-rural areas of India. This lack of competence is clearly
reflected in the current functioning of the programme. HPCL or NIIT need to spend suitable time training
themselves on the methodology required to make such a programme successful and implement the same
for optimum success.
- Lack of vision and mission statement
Unnati is in dire need of a strategic vision around which it can develop into a wholesome programme with
far-reaching impact. The lack on a long term vision is also hampering the success of this programme
which has tremendous potential for far-reaching impact. A well planned project as such could result in a
wide scale employment for youth, a higher degree of self esteem and an aspiration status for other
students. While the Rajmundhary project claimed that students in the 10th grade trained through the
programme were qualified enough for data entry jobs and they would help the students find the same,
none of the other offices could claim to be doing the same.
- Lack of risk management assessment
The programme did not undertake a thorough risk management assessment and hence, the parties had to
deal with various risks on their own means making the functioning efficient. The Dehradun NIIT Office
claimed to have put extra hours when electricity failed while the Barasat office did not put in the same.
Regarding the internet module, while the Dehradun office showed the use of Internet on their phones, the
Rajamundhry and Panipat office claimed to be completely unaware that Internet was included as a
requisite in the module. Such instances can be accounted for simply when a risk management assessment
Report on Social Audit of HPCL-CSR Activities: Unnati and Swavalamban
Page | 22
is done which covers the mitigation policy in case of failed electricity and failed internet connectivity,
hence, improves accountability.
- Not equal opportunity for students
While the programme appears to have an equal opportunity angle for all poor students, in many schools,
in order to stick to the necessary numbers, some students were selected. For example, in the Panipat
office, the school chose the deserving students for the computer education programme. This by default
goes against the idea of the programme which is to give all poor school students the chance to learn
computers.
- Quality and context for computer education
While the programme was developed to provide basic computer education to poor students, it did not
consistently reflect in the attitude of NIIT and HPCL. While in some cases like the Dehradun and Barasat
office, the instructors had accepted that the students of 6th standard could not learn as well, in the Panipat
office there was a consensus that poor students could only learn at their level and not as good as the other
students that NIIT trains. This appears as paternalism and classism on the part of NIIT. However, NIIT
does not have the expertise or experience to deal with rural markets. This attitude is also a reflection on
the environmental context in which these schools exist and the complete absence of training and
sensitivity to rural and semi-rural concepts.
Also, at the end of the programme, it was observed that the students were only interested in Paint as a
programme and could not recollect much about any other programme. This is a bigger question for NIIT
to enquire into their methodology and improve it to serve other markets so that the use and
implementation of the other programmes in equally engrossing.
- Lack of effective partnerships
The programme was developed solely by HPCL and NIIT while both did not have the experience to work
in the rural markets. This has not only compromised the quality of the executed programme but also
created multiple operational issues. For example, for the Dehradun NIIT office, in order to find a school
for the programme, they had to approach the District Education Officer who in turn recommended the
school. In other cases, as such, a local partnership with a reliable local NGO working on education issues
would have been very helpful.
Report on Social Audit of HPCL-CSR Activities: Unnati and Swavalamban
Page | 23
- Absence of sustainability of the project
The programme in its current state in not sustainable as it is. The programme is currently in its
compromised version and does not completely fulfill what it set out to do. For sustained impact, HPCL
needs to carve a better, improved programme which provides a better package which ensures better
impact. For instance, the programme focused on 4000 students across India which is a very small number.
Hence, in each school, it in turn neglects a large student population which could also be potentially
trained and fits the necessary criteria. Also, once the programme is over, there is no feedback mechanism
or continuous engagement which allows for the students to remember and reaffirm their computer skills.
The donated computers act as a token for sustainability as many of the computers are used for official
proposes by the school and become non-operative as they do not get the required maintenance and
environment to perform optimally.
Report on Social Audit of HPCL-CSR Activities: Unnati and Swavalamban
Page | 24
Chapter 3
SWAVALAMBAN
3.1 Introduction
3.1.1 Swavalamban
Project “Swavalamban” is HPCL’s one of the flagship projects on long term sustenance basis among all
CSR activities. The idea of ‘Swavalamban’, as suggested by Organization Dynamics’, is to provide
specific skill training to school drop outs which have potential of earning either through employment or
self employment. During that time, Confederation of Indian Industries (CII) in collaboration with “City
and Guild”, a UK based NGO and one of the largest assessment and certification body for Vocational
skill at International level, were taken initiative to plan out a nationwide programme to train large number
of young people in different States and cities. But the coverage of the programme was so large in India
that required lots of supporting hands to enhance the number of beneficiaries. That is also one of the
reasons why “Organization Dynamics” recommended HPCL to become a partner in this programme and
help unemployed to earn livelihood and save them from anti-social activism.
3.1.2 Project Description
The Swavalamban program was conceived to provide training and capacity building or skill development
to the needy potential candidates in order to enable them to earn livelihood for themselves and their
family and also as a part of this programme, supply the good quality professional in various trades and
services. They have used following guidelines as criteria to identify candidates for the programme under
this project:
a) The candidate belongs to the household which has income less than Rs. 10,000 per month,
b) Preferences will be given to children without parents,
c) Minimum age of the candidate should be 18 years,
d) The candidate should undergo a basic aptitude and attitude evaluation prior to selection, to assess
suitability and reliability for the respective programme.
While project ‘Swavalamban’ was conceived, it was thought that there existed sufficient infrastructural
set up to run this programme and training would be provided in specific skill development under the
expertise of “City & Guild” for four month duration basis. It was not a specific gender oriented
programme and hence, training was applicable to both boys and girls. The fee per person would be Rs.
6,000 for the entire course. To maintain quality standard, rigorous test (both in written/oral and practical)
Report on Social Audit of HPCL-CSR Activities: Unnati and Swavalamban
Page | 25
to be conducted for final assessment to qualify them for a certificate and successful candidates get a card
in shape of driving license which will enable them to take up jobs (either self employment or
employment).
Project Swavalamban is a multi-stakeholders programme which includes funding partner, implementation
partner, assessment partner and training centers. HPCL has already executed five phases of
implementation in cooperation with CII as its implementing partner. To run the implementation process
smoothly, CII has also appointed training partners and assessment partner separately. The roles and
responsibility of HPCL and CII were clearly stated in five consecutive MOUs. While HPCL’s
responsibility was to provide fund support and overall supervision, CII’s responsibility was overall
execution and periodic monitoring of the project.
3.1.3 Rationale
“One of the biggest problems faced by the country and its youth is unemployment. Also most of the
youth in rural areas lack the requisite skills for the available jobs. For the rural youth to be employed and
preferably within their area, there is a need for them to be trained in different skills. There is also a need
to make them capable of being self employed that will give them the means of earning, while at the same
time, it helps to create job opportunities for others. Having understood the needs of the youth, HPCL
took up the challenge of training youth in different vocational skills like plumbing, automobile
repairing, welding, fabrication and electrical installation”.
[Source: Bringing Smiles, 2009-10, HPCL]
3.1.4 Objectives
The aim of project ‘Swavalamban’ is to provide training and capacity building/ skill development to the
needy potential candidates to enable them to earn livelihood for themselves and their family. To achieve
this objective, multi stakeholders approach has been followed and specific target has been set up for each
stakeholder at each implementation stage. Broadly two specific objectives are given as follows:
1) “to provide training and capacity building/skill development to the needy potential candidates to
enable them to earn livelihood for themselves and their family, or alternatively, in brief, to provide
self employment for sustainable basis by imparting skill.
2) to supply good quality professionals in various trades and services”.
[Source: Several MOUs between HPCL AND CII]
Report on Social Audit of HPCL-CSR Activities: Unnati and Swavalamban
Page | 26
3.2. Social Audit
3.2.1 Governance Statement
The project, Swavalamban is implemented by multi stakeholders like HPCL, CII, assessment agency and
different training centers. There are several governance statements between different stakeholders at
different stages of implementation. Here, each of the statement is discussed.
3.2.1.1 Governance Statement between HPCL and CII
Governance statement ensures that the training centers would be chosen by CII in co-ordination with
HPCL in areas where CII had their centers so that the monitoring of the program would be easier.
Training should be monitored by CII through their training partner and quality assessment should be done
by their assessment business partner. The roles and responsibilities of CII as mentioned in several MOUs
between HPCL and CII are stated as follows:
- “Identification of suitable locations by CII for organizing training.
- Selection of candidates for training on fair and transparent basis.
- Identify potential of employment/ self employment in nearby locations.
- Conduct tests for quality training.
- Issue of certificate/card with name of HPCL on it.
- Provide a follow up document about the beneficiaries and their contact details which will be used to
conduct impact assessment post-training, based on which a report will be submitted by CII within three
months of the completion of training, in a way that the report can be used for communication on impact of
investment.
- The average duration of training will be 200 hrs. This would be contingent upon the skill trade being
chosen and average uptake of the enrolled candidates in the local areas.
- The prime responsibility of CII is to ensure that training and certification are provided to the candidates
in trades that enhance employability.” (Source: Several MOUs between HPCL and CII).
Governance statement about financial terms and conditions clearly points out that Rs. 6000 per candidate
including operational and administrative expenses will be provided by HPCL. Operational and
administrative expenses include expenses for initial study to identify skill trades, gathering feedback from
the local area, centre identification and approval, advertising and communication expenses related to
selection of candidates, delivery of training and assessment, costs of raw materials used for training,
verification of delivery and assessment through visits of visiting verifiers and quality inspectors, cost for
usage of facilities and equipment, certification and quality assurance and smart card. In addition to agreed
Report on Social Audit of HPCL-CSR Activities: Unnati and Swavalamban
Page | 27
upon fund, HPCL would facilitate the project whenever possible through its dealer network and offices of
purposes such as generation and communication to potential candidates, provision of space etc. Payment
should be made 50% on advance basis and 50% should be disbursed after completion of the training
programme.
According to the Governance statement about Records and reporting, it is mandatory to CII to maintain:
(a) “Report on skill gap analysis to ensure income generation after training,
(b) Records and evidence of candidate performance and training. The record of assessment related
activities would be made available to HPCL. Records should include methods used to enroll candidates,
final list of candidates on commencement of training, record of dropouts and final list of successful
candidates,
(c) A monthly report of activities undertaken under the project along with photographs with HPCL logo
and outcomes of the same would be forwarded by CII to HPCL, to indicate progress of the project and
(d) Within 3 months of the training, CII will submit evidence of income generation of the beneficiaries in
suitable format to be decided in consultation with the project leader”. (Source: MOU between HPCL and
CII).
Apart from this, Governance statement also pointed out Branding activities, criteria of success and
ensures employability. But as per as employability part is concerned two critical statements have been
made…
• Through this MOU the parties involved agree to explore options for and facilitate
employment for successful candidates. This would be done through the available network
of HPCL outlets in the area and other options available in nearby areas.
• The selection of skill trades and the subsequent training and certification while does not
guarantee employment from either of the parties involved in this MOU, it is agreed that
this has to enhance employability.
It is important to note that the motto of project Swavalamban is to impart training to the rural and semi-
urban youth so that they can be enable to generate income to support their livelihood. But the underlined
portion mentioned above directly contradicts the motto of this programme and raise the legal validity as
well as acceptance of the certificate of this programme. This contradiction ultimately also leads to
question about the future sustenance of this programme in terms of employment generation.
Report on Social Audit of HPCL-CSR Activities: Unnati and Swavalamban
Page | 28
3.2.1.2 Governance Statement between Assessment Partner and CII
3.2.1.2.1 City & Guild (Phase I – III)
‘City & Guild’ was a UK based NGO; one of the largest assessment and certification body for works skill
at International level. From 1st December 2004 a Joint initiative has been taken by Pravara Rural
Education Society with Confederation of Indian Industries (CII), New Delhi and City & Guilds, England,
for providing opportunity to dropout students to undergo vocational training. In order to do that, with
joint efforts of Pravara Rural Education Society, CII and City & Guilds, England 16 courses like Motor
Vehicle Engineering and Fabrication, Welding and Pipe works, Refrigeration & Air Conditioning etc.,
have been started from 1st December 2004 at ITI, Loni in Maharashtra. During this time, a base line study
was conducted by ‘Organization Dynamics’ on behalf of HPCL for their Corporate Social Responsibility
(CSR) and on the basis of their recommendations, HPCL became the partner of this programme. The
existing programme was redefined and came out as ‘Swavalamban’ project in the year 2006 vide first
MOU between CII and HPCL on 9th February, 2006.
In the nascent stage, CII central office directly implemented the project through City & Guilds as its
Principal Implementation partner vide MOU signed on 15th May, 2006. After that, they have not signed
any MOU but CII has followed the terms and conditions mentioned in the earlier MOU to implement the
project.
The roles and responsibilities of “City & Guild”, as given in the governance statement, are exactly same
as given in the MOU between CII and HPCL. They were trying to provide entry level skills and they were
not engaged in making them proficient workers. As an Assessor, their role was defined to provide
guidelines and syllabus, up-gradation of trainer’s skills, periodic verification in terms of progress of the
programme, conduct interim verification. Accordingly, ‘City & Guild’ prepared the training syllabus
which includes training schedule and the whole execution process such as guidelines to centers to execute
the projects, how to enroll candidates, what documentation to do during training, evidence to maintain
what level of training they have given, what training methodologies have been used, whether by
visualization of machines, or, hands on training guidance etc. It had conducted 3-4 days industry level
training programme (conducted twice in last 4 years) and one soft skill level training for the trainers. The
idea was to send trainers for industry training so that they can equipped with latest knowledge. Soft skill
training programme to the trainers were also arranged to make them understand the latest techniques of
imparting practical training, as well to enhance their capability.
Report on Social Audit of HPCL-CSR Activities: Unnati and Swavalamban
Page | 29
As per financial terms as mentioned in governance statement, after deducting 10 % of professional fees,
CII has given the remaining part to City & Guild of Rs. 5400 per candidate per certification towards the
assessment and certification fee which includes the cost of trainers’, assessors’, administrators’ fee,
certification costs and taxes (and it does not include the cost of Facilities, Equipments, Consumables and
general Advertising and Marketing related expenses). 50% of fee was paid before commencement of each
phase, and remaining 50% of the fee was paid on completion of training.
Out of Rs. 5400 received from CII, City & Guild allocated Rs. 2000 (inclusive of tax) as a cost to the
training centre. During the City and Guild phase, both midterm assessment and end term assessment were
done. Visiting verifier and quality inspector visited to the training centers accordingly. “City & Guild”
were associated with Swavalamban project upto phase III and suspended its India operation in 2009.
3.2.1.2.2 Sona Skills (Phase IV)
After “City & Guild” suspended its India operation, CII faced problem of monitoring due to disparity of
locations. During that time, few employees of “City & Guild” formed ‘Sona Skills’ which became an
external assessor of CII. But no governance statement was found between CII and ‘Sona Skills’ because it
was not a registered entity. During phase IV, assessment was done by “Sona Skills” and certification was
done by them and CII jointly.
3.2.1.2.3 CQ Works Skills Services Pvt Ltd (Phase V)
It is a private limited company and its head office is located at Gurgaon. It has conducted vocational
training programmes in India. CQ Works Skills Services Pvt Ltd was engaged in the project
“Swavalamban” after the suspension of ‘City & Guild’ India operation, i.e. from phase IV onwards. In the
phase IV, Sona Skills had taken only end term assessment part of ‘Swavalamban” project. They also did
certification jointly with CII during phase IV. In phase V, their role was limited to conduct end term
assessment only.
3.2.1.3: Governance Statement between Training Partner and CII
The training centers played pivotal role in the project ‘Swavalamban’ in terms of activities involved
including mobilization of candidates, registration of candidates for the programme, delivery of theoretical
lectures and practical training, periodic evaluation, prepared candidates for end term assessment. Their
defined role was to provide training as per defined syllabus and guidelines. Apart from this, they also
dealt with the grassroots level problems.
Report on Social Audit of HPCL-CSR Activities: Unnati and Swavalamban
Page | 30
In governance statement, it is clearly defined that training centre should be: (a) ensuring that the project is
run in accordance to terms laid down in this MOU, (b) registering the required numbers of candidates, (c)
doing execution and administration of the courses, (d) conducting training in accordance with the
standards as provided by CII and its partners, and (e) preparing compliances to administrative and quality
requirements laid down by CII. Moreover, the roles and responsibility of CII and its partner would be : (a)
providing the standards/syllabi for training and assessment, (b) making payment to the charges for the
external assessors/ verifiers being used in this programme, (c) maintaining quality assurance for
consistent delivery in line with set standards including train the trainer, train the assessor, administrative
inputs, verification of training delivery and assessment through visiting verifier visits, quality audits, etc.,
(d)ensuring proper assessment and certification, and (e) disbursing payment of funds for training in
accordance with terms mentioned in the MOUs.
As per financial terms mentioned in the governance statement of training centers, fund was allocated Rs.
2000 (inclusive of taxes) per candidate towards all expenses. Expenditures include consumables, utilities,
salary of trainers and internal assessor costs, any costs incurred in relation to usage of facilities,
administrative costs, communication costs, registration costs of candidates etc. Payment would be made
on the basis of three installments: (a) initial 25% fund would be provided on the basis of per candidate
registration, (b) subsequently in the next step, 37.5% fund would be disbursed during the midterm
assessment only after completion of 50% of training as certified by visiting verifier, and (c) finally, the
remaining 37.5% fund per candidate would be released after completion of training subject to number of
candidates appearing for final assessment, with a minimum of 80% attendance.
3.2.2 Stakeholder Mapping
Stakeholders form an important component of every social audit and it is important to identify and
understand the level of interest and power of each stakeholder. The stakeholders include:
- HPCL CSR Dept
- CII Skill Division
- Assessment Body
o City & Guild (Phase I-III)
o Sona Skills (Phase IV)
o CQ Works Skills Pvt. Ltd (Phase V)
- Training Center (consider 3 training centre for this study)
o Industrial Training Institute, Lone, Maharashtra
o Baba Farid ITI , Bathinda, Punjab
Report on Social Audit of HPCL-CSR Activities: Unnati and Swavalamban
Page | 31
o Bathinda Institute of Management & Technology (BIMT), Bathinda, Punjab
- Student Beneficiaries
o Current Students
o Passed out students
3.2.2.1Structure of the Team
In this project, the stakeholders are HPCL, CII, City& Gild, Sona Skills, CQ Works skill, training
centers and students. The assigned responsibility of the stakeholders during different phases is
depicted in the following table.
Table 3.1: Stakeholders under Swavalamban
Stakeholders Phase I (2006-07)
Phase II (2007-08)
Phase III (2008-09)
Phase IV (2009-10)
Phase V (2010-11)
Funding Agency HPCL HPCL HPCL HPCL HPCL Implementation Partner CII CII CII CII CII
Principal Implementation partner of CII
City & Guild City & Guild City & Guild CII CII
Assessment Agency City & Guild City & Guild City & Guild Sona Skills CQ works skills
Certification Agency City & Guild City & Guild City & Guild Sona Skills CII Monitoring Training Centre
City & Guild City & Guild City & Guild CII CII
Training Centers 8 centers 4 centers 3 centers 12 centers 8 centers
3.2.3 Stakeholder Analysis
As we already discussed about the HPCL as internal stakeholder, hence in this section we specifically
focus on the external stakeholders. It is well known that stakeholders involve crucial role in terms of
coordination and its networking with the other agencies to achieve a target within a stipulated timeframe.
3.2.3.1 Confederation of Indian Industries (CII)
- Perception
CII is a composite of member industries. Member industries have a requirement of skill manpower and as
a result, there is a demand for vocational education. CII have been working with different industries of
National repute and along with this experience, their involvement with the project ‘Swavalamban’ helps
them to implement their learning at the grassroots level for the welfare of the society. CII is the principal
implementation partner for the project ‘Swavalamban’ since 2006. As a part of this collaboration, five
Report on Social Audit of HPCL-CSR Activities: Unnati and Swavalamban
Page | 32
consecutive MOUs were already signed between CII and HPCL with specific terms of references.
Previously this project was handled by CII- Skill Development, CSR, IR/HR and Affirmative Division.
Currently it is monitored under CII-Skill Development Division. Skill Division is the custodian for
Swavalamban Project and it is monitored by the central office of Skill division which is located in
Gurgaon. It has undertaken broadly four type of activities: - Policy Advocacy, working with members,
working with Government and on-ground initiatives. Under on ground initiatives, “Swavalamban”
belongs into central level project category and it was fully funded by HPCL and monitored by CII with its
different partner training centers and partner Assessment agencies.
- Role and Responsibilities of CII in Swavalamban
1. Identifying the location in connection with HPCL.
2. Creating and mobilization of candidates.
3. Selection of candidates as per guidelines.
4. Final selection of candidates as per aptitude.
5. Training of candidates.
6. Assessment of trained candidates.
7. Industry linkages for employability.
8. Mobility of Candidates.
- Implementation Process
1) Firstly, the area for implementation was selected mutually by CII and HPCL.
2) CII chose the training institutes and vocational training providers (VTPs).
3) Trades were selected as per local industry requirements.
4) Candidates were mobilized through advertisement/leaflets etc.
5) Beneficiaries were selected as per set parameters and trade was chosen according to the grasping
ability of the candidates. The two parameters of selection were (a) Beneficiary had family income
level below Rs. 10,000/- and (b) The age of the beneficiary should be less than 18 years.
6) Candidates were trained at the VTP institute and monitored.
7) On completion of training, the candidates were assessed by external assessors sent by CII.
8) If the beneficiary passed the Assessment they would be issued the CII-HPCL joint certificate.
9) On completion, they would be linked to industries for placement.
10) Beneficiaries were monitored for positive impact in their livelihood.
11) CII would send detailed report to HPCL.
Report on Social Audit of HPCL-CSR Activities: Unnati and Swavalamban
Page | 33
- Challenges:
During the process of implementation, several issues were observed. When the project was first
taken up by CII, central office directly implemented the project through City & Guilds. Phase IV
onwards, CII has faced difficulties in monitoring the activities of the training centers.
After 2009, assessment has been done once on completion of training, as the cost of monitoring
has increased with the current inflationary trend and HPCL has not increased the fund for the
task.
Training centers also faced problem in mobilization of students due to Mahatma Gandhi National
Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), as potential candidates did not want to take
vocational training to migrate for better job.
3.2.3.2 City and Guild
Initially “City & Guild” played a proactive role in implementation and execution of the project. This
organization was involved in forming vocational education framework/ modules. Even, the modules
under the government schemes of Modular Employable Schemes (MES) have been taken from them. CII
has been working with “City & Guild” in a number of projects and initiatives. City & Guild suspended its
Indian operation in the year 2009. Accordingly, no governance statement of ‘City and Guild’ was found
during our field visit and CII did not provide any report on the performance of City and Guilds. But all
the training centers participated in this study were very happy to work with City & Guild. They
replied that City and Guild implemented as per their responsibilities and funds were disbursed at
the scheduled time. During Phase I-III, they have made periodic visit and closely associated with
the training center. After City and Guild suspended its operation, the training centers were not
getting funds in time and received less support from both implementing partner as well as
assessment partner.
3.2.3.3 CQ Works Skills Services Pvt Ltd
- Perception
CQ Works Skills Services Pvt Ltd has considered that project Swavalamban has a noble vision of
improving grass-root employability. The staff of this organization has perceived that the original idea
behind Swavalamban was to create employment opportunity among the underprivileged youth by
providing vocational training. In the present era of economic transition, they thought that it was not easy
to serve the beneficiaries and they wanted to focus on the positives and continue improvements of the
project.
Report on Social Audit of HPCL-CSR Activities: Unnati and Swavalamban
Page | 34
- Implementation
CQ started as an external assessor of candidates and monitor of the project. From phase IV onwards, their
role was to conduct end term assessment. They have done joint certification with CII only in Phase IV.
They have recruited external assessor to conduct final assessment. They have given four or five options to
the students for their practical examination. In case of vernacular language problem, oral exam was taken.
- Challenges
Broadly there are four types of challenges faced during implementation process: (a) Co-ordination with
different stakeholders, (b) time availability of the different stakeholders, (c) fund delayed, and, (d)
problem of placement ( in this case, industry orientation is strongly required). The funding pattern has not
changed since the beginning of the project over 5 years now. It is increasingly difficult to manage quality
especially with high inflationary Impact. It should be considered to improve scales of funding.
3.2.3.4 Training Centers
3.2.3.4.1 Industrial Training Institute (ITI), Lone
- Perception
ITI Lone is the only one of the pioneering institute which has started skill development programme in
association with “City and Guild”, a UK based NGO, one of the largest assessment and certification body
for works skills at international level since 2004. “Swavalamban” was started in 2008 and ITI Lone has
provided training in the following trades: Basic Motor Vehicle Engineering, Basic Plant maintenance,
Basic Electronic Installations, Basic Painting Skill, Basic Garment Making, Basic plumber, Basic Two
Wheeler Mechanic, Basic IT for Office application, Basic Fabrication Welding & Pipe Works, Basic AC
& Refrigeration etc. Principal and teaching staffs have opined that there is a need for such initiative and
they are happy to be a part of it.
- Implementation
Total 725 beneficiaries completed training and got certificates, 330 beneficiaries completed training and
waiting for result and 125 beneficiaries are currently pursuing the programme. While we interacted with
the current students, we focused on their interest, expectation after completing the programme and what
support is required to improve the programme. On the other hand, social impact analysis has been done
on the passed out student and it was checked whether this programme really helped them to get any job or
not.
Report on Social Audit of HPCL-CSR Activities: Unnati and Swavalamban
Page | 35
Status of Current Students
Current batch consists of 125 students with a high expectation that after completing the course, they will
get employment or become self employed. The whole batch is divided into five groups, each consisting of
25 students. Three trades -Basic Electronic Installations, Basic Electronics and Basic Plumber- have one
group each where as ‘Basic Motor Vehicle Engineering’ has two groups.
Status of Passed out Students
Figure 3.1: Status of Passed out Students of ITI, Lone
In the primary survey, we have excluded 330 candidates those who have completed their training in
January 2011 in the phase V but waiting for certificates till April 2011. Out of 307 passed out candidates
who participated in the survey, only 263 candidates got jobs and 250 of employed candidates mentioned
that their average income has raised compared to their earlier income. It was found that the rise in average
income over the years remained the same. However, they have not faced any problem for placement
without certificates because ITI Lone is connected with the local industry through Pravara Rural
Educational Society (PRES).
- Challenges
Apart from daily activities the staff of the ITI Lone has to maintain huge documentation related to
Swavalamban project which they consider an extra burden for them.
Time is major constraint as they have to implement the project within 3-4 months with a short
notice.
They are also facing financial hardship as there is no change in training cost allocation over five
year’s period. However, the cost of training has increased substantially.
Report on Social Audit of HPCL-CSR Activities: Unnati and Swavalamban
Page | 36
The current syllabus has not accommodated the present needs of the industry which affect the
employability of the beneficiaries.
3.2.3.4.2 Baba Farid ITI, Bathinda Punjab
- Perception
Baba Farid ITI accepted this project because of three reasons: firstly, through this project they could
provide free training and education to poor needy students; secondly, there was a scope for better
reputation (as they can work jointly with HPCL, CII and City & Guild) and finally it was a new challenge
to them as well as inspiration to do a noble job.
- Implementation
They have provided training on Basic Electrical Installation, basic Fabrication welding and pipe work,
Basic Plumbing, basic IT for computer application. They have offered a course on basic beauty therapy
(level I) only once. They have already completed training of 1228 candidates during Phase II-V and 60
candidates are currently attending the training programme.
Status of Current Students
Current batch consists of 60 students with a high expectation that after completing the course, they will
start their own work and they can contribute their income to their family. The whole students were
divided into following three trades: Basic electric Installation (20), Basic IT for Office Applications (20),
and Basic Plumbing (20).
Status of Passed out Students
Figure 3.2: Status of Passed out Students of Baba Farid ITI, Bathinda, Punjab
Report on Social Audit of HPCL-CSR Activities: Unnati and Swavalamban
Page | 37
The above result depicts that out of 301 passed out candidates, only 65 candidates’ got employment and
out of them, the average income of 60 candidates has increased compared to their previous income. The
situation is very worse in case of phase V where most of the fresh passed out candidates were not getting
their jobs. It was also noticed that waiting period of getting employment after completion of training was
more than 2 - 3 months. It is very surprised to note that none of the passed out candidates (Batch Nov-Jan
2011) received their certificates during the survey in the month of April 2011. So it is important to note
that delayed in the process of certificate distribution also affected the process of getting employment.
Challenges
Delay in the process of getting certificate created problems in terms of getting job.
With one month prior notice, it was hard for the training centre to start the training programme
and it affected the regular routine work of the institution.
The training staff focused more on how to finish the course rather than on smooth delivery of
training. Due to lack of time, the staff of this ITI was forced to provide training in the weekends
and the holidays.
Without any travel support, students found it difficult to attend the class regularly.
Finally, the pedagogy of computer course was found incomprehensive and insufficient. Material
needs to be supplied in local language as the educational qualification of the beneficiaries were
poor.
3.2.3.4.3 Bathinda Institute of Management and Technology (BIMT)
- Perception
City & Guild approached BIMT in 2006-07 for ‘Swavalamban’ project, and accordingly BIMT
management accepted it because this project objective was matched with the NGO’s1 objective. The main
aim was to develop technical skills in those beneficiaries who were not financially independent or
belonged to the weaker section of the society so that they would be self dependent for their livelihood.
According to the BIMT Director’s opinion, the course was highly successful and has been appreciated by
many philanthropic personalities of the town as it covered vast information about Information
Technology which contained both theoretical and practical knowledge.
- Implementation 1 Bathinda Institute of Management & Technology (BIMT) is operated under the aegis of Help-Educational Society (regd.), an NGO which is approved by ITC (4153) from DGE&T, NCVT, Ministry of Labour & Employment, New Delhi.
Report on Social Audit of HPCL-CSR Activities: Unnati and Swavalamban
Page | 38
BIMT has provided training in Information Technology and they have taken only ‘Basic IT Application
for Office Use’ under project Swavalamban. The duration of this course was 120 hours as per the
guidelines provided by the CII and HPCL. The curriculum of the course contained basic use of
Computers & MS Office so that candidate would get opportunities to work in the different sectors of the
commercial society. They followed the earlier guidelines provided by City & Guilds for implementation
which includes daily assignments, regular tests and visits from the subject experts from Sona Skills,
Gurgaon.
Status of Current Students
It was found that students were very positive and realized the need of computer learning. They joined the
courses due to two reasons: firstly, it was a free course and secondly, it would provide employment after
completion of the training. It was found that the current batch consisted of 85 students. They wanted to
continue their study along with computer education which might create a scope for their income
generation. They shared their satisfaction about their teachers who worked hard and followed an easy
method of teaching.
Status of Passed out Students
They have completed training of 800 beneficiaries and certificates were already distributed. Out of these
passed out, 400 candidates participated in the primary survey. The summary of the survey was given as
follows:
Figure 3.3: Status of Passed out Students of BIMT, Bathinda, Punjab
Report on Social Audit of HPCL-CSR Activities: Unnati and Swavalamban
Page | 39
It is important to note that out of 193 employed candidates; average income of 146 was increased
compared to their previous income. It was observed that over the phases, the level of average increased
income was declining. A wide difference was found between increased in the averaged income of male
beneficiaries and that of female beneficiaries.
- Challenges
Most of the students came from BPL families and they were not well versed in English language
and computer. Students found difficulties in understanding the course materials as these were
written in English. Course material in Punjabi language might be helpful to them.
Certification was not completed within a stipulated time after the assessment. Without
certificates, students were not able to get any job and they also confused about their future
planning.
It was observed that phase IV onwards, payments were made after final assessment which
violated first two norms mentioned in the last MOU which was signed on 15.07.2008. After 2008,
no MOU has been signed.
Report on Social Audit of HPCL-CSR Activities: Unnati and Swavalamban
Page | 40
3.2.4 As-is Analysis
Table 3.1 As-is Analysis of different stakeholders
No. Activities/ Roles/ Responsibilities Actual Observation Comments 1 Identify suitable locations for
organizing training. Location was decided according to the demand of HPCL to run the programme in its nearby refinery areas.
Should be based on baseline study and need assessment survey.
2 Mobilizations of candidates This was fully done by the training centers through posters, leaflets, TV scrolling, Newspaper advertisement, words of mouth. It was really become a problem for the training centre to follow all procedure within a short notice.
CII should provide a programme calendar at the outset of the phase of action. This would help training centre to implement their assigned activities smoothly without interrupting their other regular activities.
3 Criterion was used to identify candidates for the Skill development programme; a) Household income is less than Rs. 10,000/- per month. b) Preference given to children without parents. c) Minimum age is 18 years. d) The candidates should undergo a basic aptitude and attitude evaluation prior to selection, to assess suitability and reliability for the respective programmes. e) For trades like drivers, electricians etc. where there is a statutory requirement of a Government license – only those candidates having a valid license at the time of commencement of training, will be short listed for up skilling programme.
More or less candidate came from low income family. Income certificates from the local concerned authority were collected as supporting documents. In most of the cases, the age of the candidates exceeded 18 years. Preference was given to those candidates belonging into the BLP family and drop out students Initially, screening tests were conducted to know about candidate’s interest. Later on, students submitted their trade preference during the admission and discussed with the concern teacher whether they were suitable for that programme or not. It is impossible to get a government license below 18 years. Hence, we have not found any candidate who has any trade license.
Most of the cases, selection was done by the training centre on need basis as selection of candidates according to the criteria suggested by CII and HPCL would take at least 2-3 months. Short notification of initiation of new training batch would become a problem for all training centers. A yearly target would be helpful to the training centers. Selection criteria should slightly be modified because criteria c, d, e were not properly followed and some of the cases, candidates age was relaxed to achieve the number of targeted beneficiaries.
Report on Social Audit of HPCL-CSR Activities: Unnati and Swavalamban
Page | 41
No. Activities/ Roles/ Responsibilities Actual Observation Comments 4 Select candidates for training
through on fair and transparent basis. Training centers have taken age proof of the candidate, family income certificate from the concerned authority during enrollment. Teachers orient the students and try to find out the suitable trade for each of the students. This might reduce the probability of drop out. They have properly maintained all records like attendance register, internal assessment, certificate register etc.
5 Identify potential of employment in nearby locations by CII.
- No skill gap analysis has been done by CII to identify opportunity of employment/self employment in nearby locations. They thought that their other programme report was helpful to do that exercise. No placement support was provided by CII. According to CII officials, they have chosen courses according to the demand of HPCL where it has refineries. It was expected that those courses would help to generate local employment.
Skill gap analysis should be conducted. If HPCL wish to conduct the programme in refinery areas, then base line study is required before initiation of the programme. Placement support should be provided.
6 Organize proper training of 200 hours on an average by the training centers.
Each group consisted of 25 students. All courses had practical component along with theory. Timing of classes was different according to the courses. Normally ratio of theoretical and practical class is 1:2. Only 120 hours of training was conducted on “Basic IT Applications for office use”.
7 Ensure quality assurance of training delivery, assessment and Certification. Conduct tests for quality training.
All these phases were strictly followed by City and Guild during phase I-III. From phase IV onwards, only end term assessment was conducted. Quality assurance was totally stopped due to lack of fund as suggested by CII.
To see the success, midterm assessment and quality checking are required. Also CII should develop some criteria to chose assessment agency and minimize the number of intermediary in the assessment exercise.
Report on Social Audit of HPCL-CSR Activities: Unnati and Swavalamban
Page | 42
No. Activities/ Roles/ Responsibilities Actual Observation Comments 8 Issue of certification/card with name
of HPCL on it. Delivery of the certificates was delayed in the phase V. In some cases, name of the candidates was incorrect. Only in phase IV, certification was done by CII and Sona Skills, where HPCL name and logo were missing.
Certification should be done as early as possible, because without certificate, it is tough to search a job.
9 The prime responsibility of CII is to ensure that training and certification are provided to the candidates in trades that enhance employability.
No placement support was provided by CII as mentioned by the training centers. It is clearly mentioned in the MOU that neither CII nor HPCL is responsible for final placement rather it is expected that this training programme would enhance employability.
Both CII and HPCL can consider this issue for the next phases of operation. The candidates will require the support of CII and HPCL in getting the employment or self employment.
10 Payment Mechanism between HPCL and CII: 50% is paid before commencing the work and 50% balance will be paid after completion of the training programmes
CII has not properly maintained documents regarding its expenditure and channelization of fund to the training centers and their assessment partners. Out of allocated training cost of Rs 6000 per student, utilization of Rs. 4000 was not properly documented.
It should be compulsory to maintain all the fund utilization documentation. It will be helpful to CII to measure cost effectiveness of the programme.
11 Report on Skill Gap analysis is required to ensure income generation after training.
No skill gap analysis has been done separately for Swavalamban. CII has conducted several other studies which have helped them for skill gap analysis.
Baseline study and scientific cost assessment survey will be required for long term CSR plan.
12 Records and evidence of candidate performance and training and assessment related activities would be made available to HPCL
CII have not maintained all this records properly. Even both the training centres and CII were not able to show the number of candidates got employment after completing their training.
CII should improve its MIS system and documented information regarding project implementation at the training centre level.
13 A monthly report of activities is undertaken under the project to indicate its progress. Within 3 months of the training CII will submit evidence of income generation of the beneficiaries.
Quarterly report was submitted by CII to HPCL according to the structure mentioned in their MOU. Report was available, but inconsistency was found between the information provided by training centres and CII.
Reporting system should be comprehensive so that it can be cross checked and verified at each level of operation.
Report on Social Audit of HPCL-CSR Activities: Unnati and Swavalamban
Page | 43
No. Activities/ Roles/ Responsibilities Actual Observation Comments 14 Payment mechanism to the training
centre: 25% on the basis of per candidate registration, 37.5% during the midterm assessment payable after completion of 50% of training as certified by visiting verifier, and 37.5% per candidate payable upon completion of training subject to number of candidates appearing for final assessment, with a minimum of 80% attendance.
That payment mechanism was followed by City & Guild during phase I – III. CII also continued the same MOU and same terms and conditions except the financial terms. From phase IV onwards, CII changed funding mechanism without changing its governance statement. In the new mechanism, CII followed the same mechanism used by HPCL to them. It was found in training centers that CII delayed the disbursement of fund from phase IV.
Smooth payment mechanism should be required to run any project and it will give each stakeholder an incentive to successfully run the project.
Report on Social Audit of HPCL-CSR Activities: Unnati and Swavalamban
Page | 44
3.2.4.1 Quality Check Matrix:
On the basis of the above observation, it is required to check the quality of the programme whether each stage of proposed operation was properly
followed or not. To do this, we have prepared the quality check matrix to know about the inconsistency existed between the stated governance
statement and actual plan of action. It will also help us to locate the source of instability in the process of implementation. It will also help the
funding agency, HPCL to understand about the lacuna in the process of overall supervion and would help them to revise their future plan of action.
Table 3.2: Quality check matrix for all stakeholders
Quality criteria Scoring Categories Fully Partly Fairly Hardly Not at all
Is there a relevant governance statement that describes the CSR programme of HPCL? * Did stakeholders participate in creating the governance statement? * Are the values of the programme clearly stated? * Are the programme rules clearly listed? * Are the programme rules covering every aspect of the planning? * Are the programme rules following strictly by each of the stake holders? * Is the implementing agency co-ordinate with all the stakeholders properly? * Is there any lack of co-ordinations found among different stakeholders in the phases of operation?
*
Whether proper timeline/ calendar were followed at the outset of the financial year/ phase of operation?
*
Whether Training centre was informed their yearly target at the outset of the financial year/ phase of operation?
*
Are all criteria followed during the selection process of the candidates? * Whether course materials were supplied during the training? * Whether vernacular language faced problem during training? * Are all steps of assessment strictly followed by the assessment agency? * Has training centre delivered training within the scheduled time? * Has training centre recorded all documents properly?
*
Report on Social Audit of HPCL-CSR Activities: Unnati and Swavalamban
Page | 45
Quality criteria Scoring Categories Fully Partly Fairly Hardly Not at all
Did training centre maintain all information regarding student enrollment, attendance sheet, and distribution of certificate?
*
Did assessment agency strictly document all the steps of their operation? * Did Implementing agency CII document related records of training properly? * Are financial terms and conditions and payment mechanism clearly mentioned in the governance statement?
*
Is HPCL consistently providing fund for conducting training? * Did CII record all breaking up of cost documentation/fund utilization records properly? * Did assessment agency record all cost documentation/fund utilization records properly? * Has training centre recorded all cost documentation/fund utilization records properly? * Is there any payment delay observed between CII and training centre? * Is there any mismatch observed regarding reported number of beneficiaries by CII and Training centre?
*
Is there any delay related to distribution of certification? * Is there any less co-ordination between CII and training centre? * Is there any problem created for the success criteria set by CII and assessment agency? * Is there any support provided by CII for placement of the students? * Is there any problem about the non recognition of the certificate? * Is there any selection criterion followed to select assessment partner? * Was any govt. recognized NGO chosen as a partner of CII at each phases of operation? * Is there any incidence of delayed payment made by CII to the training centre? * Was HPCL supervising the programme properly at each phases of operation? * Did CII monitor the programme properly at each phases of operation? * Was certificate ceremony cost borne by the training centre? * Was payment mechanism changed by CII as mentioned in the governance statement of the training centers?
*
Report on Social Audit of HPCL-CSR Activities: Unnati and Swavalamban
Page | 46
3.3. Social Accounting: Key issues
- Weak supervision on Implementation agency
HPCL has fully depended on its implementing agency CII. They have chosen CII on the basis of
general perception of CII’s reputation, specific areas of expertise they looking for, good track record
etc. Less number of supervision, surprise visit also reflected its overall dependency on its implementing
partner. It was mutually decided that, in any case, if required, only GOI empanelled NGOs should be
considered to become partner of the CII. But after work suspension of City & Guild, CII recruited an
unregistered farm “Sona Skills” as their assessment partner and also on the certificate the logo of CII and
Sona Skills were kept.
- Lack of plan implementation by CII from Phase IV onwards
During the first three phases, CII outsourced the whole implementing process to the City and Guilds.
According to the responses received from training centers, their feedback on City and Guild was really
good. But after City and Guild suspended their activities, CII has faced difficulties in monitoring the
implementation in different locations due to regional disparities. Their monitoring difficulties were also
reflected as non-cooperation to the training centers.
- Delayed in payments by CII from Phase IV onwards
As per MOU signed between CII and training centers, payment mechanism was such that 25% would be
delivered on the basis of per candidate registration, 37.5% during the midterm assessment payable after
completion of 50% of training certified by visiting verifier, and 37.5% per candidate payable upon
completion of training subject to number of candidates appearing for final assessment, with a minimum of
80% attendance. Up to Phase III, they were getting funds into three installment as per agreed in the MOU.
From Phase IV onwards, funds were not distributed on a regular basis. There was a delay in fund
disbursement from CII to the training institutes which have affected the implementation of Swavalamban.
- Cost documentation was not maintained by CII
As HPCL is a public sector enterprise, it is very clear that their allocated money for corporate Social
Responsibility activities should be properly utilized. To check this, social auditor should always emphasis
to study the mechanism used for channelization of fund to the all stakeholders. As a well-known industry
body like CII, it is expected that they should properly document all these records for future reference. But
it is found that CII has not properly maintained the cost documents whereas the training centers have
properly recorded all the documents. For an example, HPCL allocated budget of Rs. 6000 per candidate.
Report on Social Audit of HPCL-CSR Activities: Unnati and Swavalamban
Page | 47
All three training centers were getting Rs. 2000 per candidate and it was well documented. But the
remaining amount of Rs. 4000 per candidate for which no records were maintained in a proper way. It is
also surprising to note that this Rs. 4000 was utilized only for end assessment and certification, although
the certification ceremony cost was borne by the training centers. From this background, it is clear that
the utilization of two-third portion of actual money has not been properly documented. On the other
hands, training centers were struggling for funds to meet the increasing part of the training cost. It is also
proved that proper verification of cost will be required at HPCL level before designing the grant structure.
- Mismatch between data provided by CII and training centre
It is noteworthy that there is a severe mismatch between the data on certified beneficiaries provided by
the CII and respective training centers. The number of certified students is greater according to the data
provided by CII than the training centre’s data. It reflects low connectivity of CII with the training centers
at the grass root level and also indicates lack of co-ordination.
Another important issue to be noted that in the Phase I, targeted beneficiaries was 1100 and the estimated
cost was Rs. 66 lakhs where as from the data collected from HPCL it was obtained that Rs 34 lakhs was
disbursed actually. It implies that number of beneficiaries should be much lower than 1100, but actually
1082 beneficiaries were covered by CII which is quite larger with respect to the actual disbursed fund.
This issue is not clarified.
- Transportation cost of students to attend the training programme
Most of the student participated in this programme lived in villages. In Maharashtra, the villages are
located within 5-10km within the periphery of ITI Lone. But situation is very severe in Bathinda, Punjab
where candidate came from 20-25 km away from the training centre. Most of the training center raised the
issue.
- Success criteria based only end term basis
Initially success rate was based on mid-term assessment, report provided by quality inspector and visiting
verifier and finally end term assessment. Two different views towards midterm assessment were found.
On one hand, assessors started interim assessment to know how the training was progressing for two
batches during phase I. Then they realized that the students were not ready for interim assessment. During
the process of mid-term assessment a lot of complex issues have been raised such as students who did not
perform well, demotivated which resulted increase in drop outs after midterm evaluation. Rather than
midterm evaluation, it is important to verify the process of delivery, to know whether trainers were facing
Report on Social Audit of HPCL-CSR Activities: Unnati and Swavalamban
Page | 48
any problem or whether they used proper methodology so that drop out/ low – educated background
student can understand.
On the other hands, staff of the training centre expressed their views that midterm assessment should be
conducted because it gives candidates some idea about the end term assessment. But staff of CII have a
different justification about midterm assessment. They have mentioned that they have limited fund
allocated for assessment and they have already placed their demand to raise the cost of training. However,
according to HPCL CSR team, implementing agency should increase the horizontal2 outreach without
increasing the vertical outreach of the programme.
- Lack of effective partnerships
It was found that there was lack of coordination among the different stakeholders of this project. For
example, training centers have not received any communication from CII in advance regarding the
project. So due to lack of time it became difficult to implement the project in a systematic manner. Most
of the beneficiaries did not know the involvement of HPCL as very few staff of HPCL seldom visited the
training centers. All of the training centers suffered due to delay in fund disbursement.
Miscommunication between CII and training centers were found regarding reporting, documenting and
channelization of fund.
- Lack of selection criteria / process in choosing Assessment partner
Most of the times, students were assessed by experienced persons who were engaged earlier with City &
Guild operation. During the phase IV and V, assessment partner were selected on ad hoc basis. These
assessors only assessed students at the end of the programme. It did not help the students to improve their
performance. Without their support regarding conducting midterm evaluation, feedback on this
evaluation, quality checks etc., it was found difficult to achieve the success of the programme.
2 Here increase in Horizontal outreach means increase in number of beneficiaries. Increase in vertical outreach means improve in quality of training by increasing cost / facilities.
Report on Social Audit of HPCL-CSR Activities: Unnati and Swavalamban
Page | 49
Chapter 4
RECOMMENDATIONS
In this section the social audit team has provided suggestions to improve the project delivery of these two
CSR projects of HPCL. The team has found that these two projects, Unnati and Swavalamban have
enormous development potentials and proper implementation of these projects would help the
beneficiaries to achieve the success. Here audit team has proposed alternative models of implementation
for these two projects.
4.1 UNNATI
Clarify contradictions
HPCL needs to have a multi-stakeholders meeting to evaluate the inconsistencies and consider possible
steps that could be taken to clarify the existing contradictions and set a new bar of comprehension of
common thinking about Unnati before the start of the project in a new set of schools.
Dissatisfaction amongst internal and external stakeholders
There is a need for proactive participation from HPCL to bring stakeholders together and deliberate on
issues or areas which can cause potential issues. The nature of their guidelines and rules which has been
fairly vague so far needs to be revaluated in the light of the current areas of disagreement regarding
Unnati.
Work on perception issues
HPCL’s CSR strategy should immediately translate into better percept of the company internally and
externally. Unnati unfortunately has not reached that zenith. Also, as mentioned before, within Unnati,
there are perception issues which require to be taken care of.
Develop solutions to recognized problems with stakeholder consultation
The problems that have emerged out of the social audit need to be immediately addressed. A multi-
stakeholders consultation is always a good way to develop a sustainable solution because it sets the base
for greater accountability and transparency and ensures a higher degree of cooperation and satisfaction
amongst stakeholders.
Report on Social Audit of HPCL-CSR Activities: Unnati and Swavalamban
Page | 50
Improve project planning and overall functioning
Project planning is that element of Unnati which if changed can make an exceptional difference to the
execution and overall success of the programme. The project needs to be studied from the operation’s
perceptive to guarantee smooth functioning.
Develop governance statement and review missed objectives
HPCL also needs to develop a governance statement for the entire programme. Once the governance
statement is developed, the objectives, rules and guidelines and the planning can smoothly flow out of the
same. This also ensures there is a smooth progression of values and information within the programme.
4.2 SWAVALAMBAN
Strengthen CSR department
Presently CSR Department of HPCL consists of one General Manager (GM) and one Deputy Manager;
both of them jointly monitor all projects. It is expected that HPCL should strengthen its CSR department
so that overall supervision becomes easy. Recruitment of specialized expert will also help them to draw
the plan of action and its periodic implementation. Periodic monitoring, surprise visit will also help the
CSR team to build rapport at the grassroots level.
Revision of Governance Statement
Governance statement between any two stakeholders should be clearly stated and it should be revised in
every financial year. It will help all the stakeholders to understand their responsibilities. Whether the
stated responsibilities have been undertaken or not, HPCL should monitor time to time basis.
Improve the Employment Opportunity
The success of Swavalamban lies on creating employment opportunity for the unemployed and unskilled
youth. HPCL along with CII should develop support system to create wage employment as well as self
employment for the beneficiaries through networking with industries.
Provision of toolkits for beneficiaries
To take self employment as well as wage employment, beneficiaries need toolkits. After midterm
evaluation, beneficiaries should be provided required toolkits based on their performance.
Report on Social Audit of HPCL-CSR Activities: Unnati and Swavalamban
Page | 51
Recognition of training certificate
It is found that industries have doubted Swavalamban as a valid skill training programme. It affected the
acceptability of these students as skilled labourers. Involving local industries in this programme will help
HPCL and training centers to sort out this problem. Even, some jobs could be created at the HPCL outlets
for these beneficiaries.
Proper Channelization of fund
It was found that under Swavalamban, fund was not channelized in time which affected the programme
delivery. HPCL and CII should develop proper criteria for fund channelization and monitor the process
frequently.
Set yearly target in the first quarter of the financial year
To smoothen the implementation at the grassroots level, a yearly target should be set for the training
centers in the first quarter of the financial year and before the starting day of academic session. It will
help these centers to implement the project in a better manner.
Revision of course curriculum and training supports
The course curriculum for Swavalamban needs to be revised according to the industrial needs. Otherwise
it will not help the beneficiaries to get the wage employment as well as self employment. Other supports
like provision of toolkits, provision of travel support, provision of industry-visit, provision of placement
at the end of the certification should be considered. Pedagogy of computer course needs to be designed in
such a way that students can earn mo0re income. For example, computer language like C, C++, Java as
well as account package software like Tally could be incorporated in the syllabus.
Report on Social Audit of HPCL-CSR Activities: Unnati and Swavalamban
Page | 52
4.3 Alternative model for implementation
In this section, the audit team has recommended two alternative models of implementation for Unnati and
Swavalamban Projects.
4.3.1 UNNATI
Figure 4.1: Alternative model for implementation of “Unnati”
Firstly, HPCL has to begin with commissioning a baseline study (conducted along with a multi-
stakeholders consultation) in the regions that it wants to work in. Once the study is ready, based on the
findings, HPCL should develop a CSR programme with a core governance statement which emerges from
the main aims of the organization, its value base, organizational rules and policies and the operational
objectives. Using this as a foundation, goals and objectives for Unnati on an annual or biannual process
must be set. It is important to follow an open process and documentation for the same as it helps multiple
stakeholders be abreast with the programme and increases HPCL and Unnati’s credibility. The
programme plan must emerge from the needs of the community and other stakeholders which will be
revealed through an external SWOT analysis, mapping and profiling of key stakeholders. Once the
programme is formulated, a performance management system should be brought into place so that
Develop Governance Statement for Unnati programme
Baseline study + Multi-stakeholder consultation
Set goals and objectives of Unnati
Develop programme plan
Open process and documentation
Planned actions and measurement
Internal stakeholder consultation
Internal SWOT AnalysisRoles, Tasks, Responsibilities Internal Position Analysis Set Objectives
External stakeholder consultation External SWOT AnalysisStakeholder Record Stakeholder Dialogue Position Analysis Set Objectives
Monitoring and reporting framework
Main Aim Subsidiary Aims Operational Objectives: Policies: Organizational Rules: Value Base:
E
q
u
i
t
y
Responsiveness
Participation
Consensus based
Transparency
Accountability
Report on Social Audit of HPCL-CSR Activities: Unnati and Swavalamban
Page | 53
monitoring and reporting of the programme becomes easy and the social impact assessment becomes
measurable.
Another key to the success of Unnati will be an internal stakeholder analysis and consultation so that the
internal motivation and understanding of the employees is evaluated and correctly incentivized for their
proactive participation. For a successful and sustainable CSR initiative, HPCL will have to inculcate the
values of transparency, accountability, equity, consensus orientation, participation and responsiveness
within the programme.
4.3.2 SWAVALAMBAN
Previously, audit team mentioned that City and Guild implemented Swavalamban project well during the
first three phases. Taking cues from their experience, HPCL can slightly modify its existing
implementation plan. Here we have developed an alternative model (given below in figure 2) which is
nothing but simple modifications of the existing model through which HPCL can remove the existing
lacuna of implementation model. The model can incorporate certain processes like specific structure of
stakeholders’ selection, preparation of timeline for project implementation and budget allocation at the
outset of the respective financial year, multi-stakeholders consultation and their SWOT analysis during
the process of implementation, proper assessment and provide back up support for placement.
Report on Social Audit of HPCL-CSR Activities: Unnati and Swavalamban
Page | 54
Figure 4.2: Alternative model for implementation of “Swavalamban”
Step XII Placement
support
Step XI Impart training
& Ensure quality Assessment
Step X Multi-stakeholder Consultation and SWOT analysis
Step IX Execution &
Monitoring the project
Step VIII MOU between stakeholders
Step VII Invite Tender for
stakeholder selection
Step V Allocation of
Budget
Step IV Project
Development / Timeframe
Step III Criteria for stakeholder
selection
Step II Scientific Cost
Assessment of the project
Step I Need Assessment
Survey
HPCL (Funding and
Overall Supervision)
Report on Social Audit of HPCL-CSR Activities: Unnati and Swavalamban
Page | 55