Download - Gransha Lecture UAS 2012
![Page 1: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
A unique Middle Bronze Age cemetery at Oakgrove, Co. Londonderry
Robert M Chapple
![Page 2: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Dedication:
Robert F Chapple (1941-2012) & Billy Dunlop (1920-2011)
1st century AD Roman Villa at Hadleigh, Suffolk
![Page 3: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Where are we talking about?
● PS: I don't care whether you call it Derry or Londonderry
![Page 4: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Thornhill (Neolithic)
Enagh (Neolithic)
Shantallow (Bronze Age)
County as a whole: lots of BA sites & finds, but concentrated in the EBA & LBA. Other than Corrstown, the MBA is largely absent
Ballynashallog (Bronze Age)
Rough Island (Bronze Age)
![Page 5: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Mesolithic surface find
EBA Burnt Mound
Early Christian site: Dergbruagh
Site 19
Early Neolithic sites (2)
![Page 6: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
●Site 7: Late Mesolithic flint ●Site 11: Early Neolithic ritual (?) pits ●Site 12: Early Neolithic structure (?) ●Site 10: Early Bronze Age burnt mound ●Site 19: Middle Bronze Age cemetery & Iron Age structure ●Remainder: broadly prehistoric, but undated
![Page 7: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
In advance of construction of Oakgrove Integrated College school buildings, playing fields etc.
Monitoring & Excavation: Sites 1-12: June-November 2002 (UJA 67, 2008) Sites 13-17: July 2003 (BAR 521, 2010) Sites 18-20: October 2003-January 2004 (BAR 521, 2010)
![Page 8: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
● Sites 13-19
![Page 9: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Site 19
Surface finds: Metal slag Pottery: portions of 3 BA coarse
ware vessels Various flints (débitage to
finished pieces) flint knife - possibly intended to
be hafted
![Page 10: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
● Surface find
large unfinished
perforated macehead - heavily damaged blade-end
![Page 11: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
● Surface find
● Natural stone or rubber stone for saddle quern?
● Vaguely axe shaped – significant?
![Page 12: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
● Anatomy of site 19
● Enclosure ditch
![Page 13: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
● Anatomy of site 19
● Enclosure ditch ● Segmented circle
![Page 14: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
● Anatomy of site 19
● Enclosure ditch ● Segmented circle ● Cemetery of atypical cists
![Page 15: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
● Anatomy of site 19
● Enclosure ditch ● Segmented circle ● Cemetery of atypical cists ● Intermediate features
(including a second circle)
![Page 16: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
● Anatomy of site 19
● Enclosure ditch ● Segmented circle ● Cemetery of atypical cists ● Intermediate features
(including a second circle) ● Iron Age metal working
structure
![Page 17: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Iron Age Structure
● 6 post holes & 2 stake holes
![Page 18: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
5.93m x 5.39m
Missing post hole?
Open sided?
No walls? - just posts?
![Page 19: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Hearth & stake holes
![Page 20: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
● Interpreted as windbreak for hearth
![Page 21: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
● Iron slag in the hearth, adjacent pits etc.
● Interpreted as smithy/secondary workshop
14C: 2187±46 BP (385-113 cal BC) from wood charcoal from hearth [old wood?] Traditional ‘Iron Age lull’ … Parallels: Johnstown 1, Co Meath Muckerstown, Site 13b, Co Meath Hardwood 3, Co Meath … but even relative to other aspects of the IA – pretty slim! Should underline the importance of Gransha site.
![Page 22: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Pebbled surface
● Small, but important area
● Compact pebbled surface, overlain by out-wash from the enclosing ditch
● Suggests: close to original ground surface & that little truncation has occurred (at least here)
![Page 23: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
The enclosure ditch
Total length: 70.42m Enclosed: c.367m2
Max: 0.79m in width and 0.68m depth
Cut through shallow subsoil & into shale bedrock
![Page 24: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
The enclosure ditch
Total length: 70.42m Enclosed: c.367m2
Max: 0.79m in width and 0.68m depth
Cut through shallow subsoil & into shale bedrock
Excavated in 47 box sections
(BSs: A-AV)
![Page 25: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
BS: A-B
Large post pit, predating ditch Contained 1 sherd of BA coarse ware Back-filled with rounded field stones
[vs. broken shale in ditch + c. 2.67m3 from post pit] … ritual?
14C: 3350±21 BP (1730-1536 cal BC)
from wood charcoal in post pipe … beginning of the MBA: oldest phase of Site 19
![Page 26: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
● Thin shale slabs used as direct post packing
![Page 27: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
● What would the post have looked like?
1:3 ratio: minimum length of 5m, with 3.75m visible above ground. 1m3 of green oak = 1.07 tonnes => volume of c 0.27m3 & 284.06kg Many caveats but suggests a substantial timber: visible for some considerable distance around
such a ‘special’ timber: may have been richly decorated …
![Page 28: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
One option: Native American Indian style totem poles
Alternatives: painted decoration Textile Bone/antler/shell
![Page 29: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Problem: nothing like this has ever been found in Ireland Alternatives?
crude and sexually ambiguous figure from Ralaghan, county Cavan
![Page 30: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Problem: nothing like this has ever been found in Ireland Alternatives?
a) Ralaghan, Co. Cavan b) Dagenham (Essex) England c) Ballachulish (Argyll) Scotland d) Teigngrace (Devon) England e) Montbouy (Loiret) France
![Page 31: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Problem: nothing like this has ever been found in Ireland Alternatives?
Fellbach-Schmiden, Germany: later - La Tene Iron Age
Also IA: sandstone figure from
Holzgerlingen (right) with a copy of the 'stone knight' from Glauberg (left)
![Page 32: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Corlea 1, Co. Longford. Trackway dated to 148 BC (Q5631) Anthropomorphic figure carved on the end of a 3m long ash trunk
Photos reproduced by permission from: Raftery, B. 1996 Trackway Excavations in the Mountdillon Bogs, Co. Longford, 1985-1991, Dublin.
![Page 33: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
● By the time of the enclosing ditch, post had been removed & carefully back filled
![Page 34: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
● Some portions of the ditch (N & NE) faced with slabs. Function? [palisade fence?] Why just here?
![Page 35: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
BS: AJ
Find: broken, polishing/grinding stone, with a superficial axe blade end
Unusual section: base of ditch ground down – smooth & even
![Page 36: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Pottery in the ditch
● Identified 17 vessels (1-33 sherds) 1: cinerary urn with perforated rim 16: plain Bronze Age coarse ware
![Page 37: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Cinerary urn
Paralleled: ring barrow at Mullaghmore, Co Down. But: pre 14C. Dating is problematic: EBA-IA
![Page 38: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
17 vessels ● But all sherds not together
![Page 39: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
17 vessels ● But all sherds not together
● for example: Fragments of vessel 19:10 were discovered in
nine different box sections (BSs: I, H, G, E, D, A, AV, AU & W).
Seemed to be 3 distinct clusters (BSs: I-G, E-D
& A-AU) , + ‘outlier’ in BS: W. Excluding BS: W – 1 vessel distributed over c.
14.37m.
![Page 40: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
17 vessels ● But all sherds not together
● for example: vessel 19:02 deposited across 8 box sections
(BSs: I-E, AV, AT & AR) Distributed over c. 19.61m
![Page 41: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Repeated across majority of vessels
Main concentration: BSs: K-AR
(c. 25.28m) Outliers: BSs: W, R & AE Pottery: mostly from top of fill.
Possible truncation: BSs: AQ-AB
![Page 42: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Flint & stone
● Even more extreme
Distribution: BSs: K- B (c. 9.38m) + outliers Even discounting possible truncation: no pot or
flint in the W & NW I suggest: different rituals? Different parts of
the ditch have different cultural significance? – required different ritual responses?
Perishable materials?: wood, leather, liquids?
![Page 43: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Entrance?
● Nothing definite
BSs: AI-AJ – ground down smooth – not hacked polishing/grinding stone, with a superficial axe
blade end – only non-flint lithic from ditch
● Significant?
Broken? Axe-like? Part of a 'closing
ceremony'?
![Page 44: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
The external ditch Largest single feature within the complex Function: enclose/define the funerary/ritual area of the site I suggest: relatively late in life cycle of site [insufficient charcoal for date] Late date: explains irregularities of shape – not just concerned with the SW segmented circle & cists: ie – NE segmented circle. Also: ‘kink’ in E portion of ditch – need to link the large post pit to the rest of the site?
![Page 45: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Conceived as a response to decay of the post and palisade/screen at segmented inner circle & NE pit circle. Probably held manifold meanings 1) simple: define & protect sacred space 2) complex: social and religious symbolism Speculation: Digging heralded changes in ritual practice, or even social polity?
![Page 46: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
What did this enclosure look like? narrow ditch (maximum width: 0.79m) Some portions – slab lined – possibly for palisade fence – but no direct evidence of posts. Late ritual action: remove posts & backfill – possibly at same time as deposition of flint & pottery: part of closing ritual?
![Page 47: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Inner ditch
4 sections: diameter of c 12.2m 8 EBA-MBA coarse ware vessels + various flints MBA 14C date from C19212 3263±24 BP
(1613-1461 cal BC)
![Page 48: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
● Laid our from central stake hole … but on two different circles
ish
original form: palisaded fence? 1:3 ratio: fence 1.20m with 0.90m
projecting.
![Page 49: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
ish
no evidence for planks/posts. Fence didn’t exist? Fence removed? Finds deposited as part of ‘backfilling ritual’?
![Page 50: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Central cemetery
contained 44 features. 13 pits 2 post holes 13 stake holes 1 possible gully 1 depression 14 atypical cists
![Page 51: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
![Page 52: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
![Page 53: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
![Page 54: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Slab sides 2-7
![Page 55: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Only 3 survived
![Page 56: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
12 cists had grain
Ranging form a few grains to >70,000 V few wheat (3 cists) – mostly barley: naked & 6-row
varieties predominated
![Page 57: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
A quick note about that grain ...
● McClatchie: remains of funeral meals ● A large proportion of the charred grain was
fragmentary/damaged. ● Interpreted as evidence of movement prior to deposition in
cists
![Page 58: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Big Problem!
C1976 – 10 frags of bone (2g) Unidentifiable – comminution? In bag/wrapper? Directly below grain-rich layer
F19275 c2,500 charred cereal grains & fragments. 80% subsample of grain (2063 grains): barley (naked & 6-row varieties) + 1 wheat grain.
F19276 +5 frags of bone + 608 charred cereal grains
![Page 59: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
All E-MBA Coarse wares
Within segmented inner ditch: 4
coarse ware vessels
1 cordoned urn
![Page 60: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
![Page 61: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Layout No particular pattern: clustering towards SE Central area kept clear: ritual/ceremonial? What did they look like? Those with capstones were level with bedrock – perhaps above ground markers – small cairns? Speculation: Unfinished macehead & rubbing stone found near C19192– from such a marker deposit? Grain + rubbing stone … added symbolic value?
![Page 62: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
Other features produced artefacts (flint & pottery) of probable comparable date but did not have slab-covered sides. All produced grain. None produced cremated bone. Location inside the segmented circle does raise questions as to their ritual significance. Possible: ‘cists’ are cenotaphic & lack of bone may suggest similar function to the slab-lined cists. If the ritual here is actually about the deposition of grain – then possibly of equal ritual status to the slab-lined cists
![Page 63: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
Another big post pit ...
● Quartz (top) & flint scrapers from backfill ● 2 charred barley grains from post pipe
● 1:3 ratio: minimum length of 2.04m, with 1.53m visible above ground.
● 1m3 of green oak = 1.07 tonnes => volume of c 0.30m3 & 321.36kg
![Page 64: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
A quick word about alignments
Central stakehole: Functional: used to draw segmented circle: similar to embanked stone circle at Grange, Co. Limerick Speculation: alignments 1) between pit & circle segment via large post (NE) 2) along edge of large post inside circle and edge of circle segment (NW) Untested!
![Page 65: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
The 'Intermediate features'
disparate collection of 20 features
![Page 66: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
10 produced evidence of BA date: various flint & BA Coarse Ware pottery. None had grain or bone
![Page 67: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
● Just an area of shallow pits? ...
![Page 68: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
Warning! … wild speculation & conjecture!
A second Segmented
circle?
![Page 69: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
Something is happening here, but you don't know what it is ...
● IF these features are actually part of a
unit … what would it have looked like?
● Palisaded fence? ● Sockets for orthostats?
![Page 70: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
● … LBA recumbent circle of 14 stones at Ballycraigy, Co Antrim - ‘flat-rimmed ware’ pottery and cremated bone from an associated ditch … unfortunately not published.
![Page 71: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
Different circle … different function …
Important: no evidence of bone/funerary activity
No evidence of charred grain Whatever is going on here is not
part of the same form of ritual/ceremonial/funerary activity as the SW segmented circle
![Page 72: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
Analogy: modern Christian worship Speculation: evidence for a demarcation between varying levels of ritual exclusivity: access is controlled between various grades of sanctified space and more public places.
![Page 73: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
The function of the cists Small quantities of bone: suggests only token deposits placed here Context: mean weight of bone from cremation of an adult male: 2288g (range: 1534g to 3605g) mean weight of bone from cremation of an adult female: 1550g (range 952g to 2278g) Cist C19274 (larger of two deposits): 8g
![Page 74: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
Comparison: Loughbrickland Excavations With one exception human bone from primary burial contexts ranged from 12.2g to 1602.7g (mean: 557g) Survival of capstones indicate that these were cists (if atypical) – not stone-lined pits/postholes Possible: rituals did not necessarily involve deposition of any human remains Speculation: carbonised grain, flint or pottery acted as a ‘substitute corpse’ in token burial or synecdochic cists.
![Page 75: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
Parallels for Middle Bronze Age burial: the background
Cooney and Grogan (Cooney & Grogan 1994; Grogan 2004) argue: continuity between the burials of the EBA to the LBA, through the MBA. Grogan (2004): MBA downturn in climatic conditions => increased votive deposition within wetland areas, + increase in the use of trackways. MBA: coarse domestic vessels introduced into the burial record - replacing the cordoned urn by 1500-1400 cal BC. Emerging trends: 1) general decrease in the proportion of the skeletal remains buried (frequently <1%) Grogan (2004, 69) dates: c 1300-1000 cal BC (burials containing a large % of the cremated individual still occur (eg Loughbrickland) Bone: frequently so heavily processed (comminuted), through crushing or pounding, as to be unidentifiable (<5mm) + pyre material incorporated
![Page 76: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
Parallels for Middle Bronze Age burial: the background
2) only a small portion of a vessel with the buried remains. Degree of comminution may parallel change from whole to partial vessels. Cooney & Grogan (1994) : portion of cremated remains + sherds may have been used and dispersed as part of an extended or multi-stage (phased) funerary ceremony. => as much emphasis on act of cremation & funeral ritual (+ curation) as in deposition in grave.
![Page 77: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
Barley as food offering Parallels with formal barrows at: Mitchelstowndown West, Co Limerick Lissard-Ballynamona complex : no evidence of any cremated bone. Grogan (2004) suggests: cenotaphic commemoration without necessity for human remains
![Page 78: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
Most MBA burials: unaccompanied cremations in unlined pits Some: stone-lined pits, occasionally covered by small capstones Parallels: Baurnadomeeny, Co Tipperary (O’Kelly 1960) Monknewtown, Co Meath (Sweetman 1976) Lough Gur, Co Limerick (Cleary 1995) Moylisha, Co Wicklow (Ó h-Iceadha 1946)
![Page 79: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/79.jpg)
Closest parallel for the Gransha Site 19: Duntryleague 2, Co Limerick
Atypical ring barrow (F1), defined by a ‘gapped trench’
![Page 80: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/80.jpg)
Closest parallel for the Gransha Site 19: Duntryleague 2, Co Limerick
Atypical ring barrow (F1), defined by a ‘gapped trench’ Enclosed by a curvilinear ditch (F12)
![Page 81: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/81.jpg)
Closest parallel for the Gransha Site 19: Duntryleague 2, Co Limerick
Atypical ring barrow (F1), defined by a ‘gapped trench’ Enclosed by a curvilinear ditch (F12) Intermediate area: various features including a pit small quantity of unidentifiable, burnt bone (F11)
A quantity of coarse, undecorated pottery was also recovered from the site
![Page 82: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/82.jpg)
Duntryleague 2a two lengths of concentric, curvilinear ditches (F72 & F73) appeared to enclose a single pit (F71). One ditch (F72) and the pit produced small quantities of unidentifiable, cremated bone Ditch: two sherds of coarse ware pottery from two different vessels.
![Page 83: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/83.jpg)
Raheen, Co Limerick two sets of curvilinear ditches (F1/19 and F2 & F17) produced undecorated coarseware pottery and appeared to enclose a number of features (undated). Excavator: argues contemporaneity + similar purpose & range of functions as Duntryleague 2 & 2a
![Page 84: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/84.jpg)
Cooney and Grogan (1994) In Munster distribution pattern for MBA burials: 1) on poor soils, along the flood plains of rivers 2) in groups, on either sides of rivers => evidence of territoriality where the cemeteries lay on the peripheries of land units stretching up from the valley floor No comparable sites are known from the opposite bank of the Foyle Gransha: on a ridge overlooking a river – conforms to pattern. General separation of domestic & funerary spaces: Gransha: Large amount of ground stripped, but no contemporary settlement found
![Page 85: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/85.jpg)
Cooney and Grogan follow Hodder (1982): regard peripheral placement of cemeteries as parallel to the peripheral/diminished importance of the ancestors within society => focus of mortuary practice on the ceremonial treatment of the cremation process and disposal of the remains not on the cemeteries themselves. Alternative: placement of cemeteries on the edges of putative territorial units => demonstrates the vitality and power still commanded by the ancestral dead in protecting the community from external forces (physical/spiritual). Gransha: the large posts on the brow of a ridge - visible for a considerable distance? Designed to be seen by other communities? … claim to the land … or as a statement that the Gransha group were actively protected by their dead.
![Page 86: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/86.jpg)
Let’s turn this around … grain in 12 out of 14 cists & bone in only 2 cists … was bone only a minor element? Was the ritual actually about the deposition of charred grain? Speculation: token portion of the grain harvest - symbolically put beyond human use by burning - placed in cist-like structures as a means of returning a share of nature’s bounty back to the earth.
![Page 87: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/87.jpg)
In some cultures (e.g. Hinduism, Jainism & Sikhism) cremation is regarded as both a sanitary means of disposing of a corpse & as a way of allowing the ‘soul’ or spirit to escape and transcend to some form of afterlife. Does charring of the grain work in an analogous manner? … Transferring it to the spirit realm.
![Page 88: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/88.jpg)
Parallels: Christian Harvest Festival: deity is thanked for a successful crop by the presentation of a token portion within the church. Based on Hebrew tradition (Torah) of presenting burnt offerings: Genesis, Exodus & Leviticus. Compilation of the Torah in written form conventionally dated to Babylonian Exile (c.600 BC), but incorporating much older elements.
![Page 89: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/89.jpg)
Obvious parallel: The Wicker Man (1973) Sacrifice of humans, animals & vegetables to ensure good harvest after years of famine Based on accounts by Caesar and the geographer Strabo: mention the wicker man as one of many ways the Druids of Gaul performed sacrifices
![Page 90: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/90.jpg)
Actually a useful way of thinking about this form of archaeology: charred remains/bone would survive … but what about the rest of the ritual?
![Page 91: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/91.jpg)
… but what about the rest of the ritual?
Singing
![Page 92: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/92.jpg)
… but what about the rest of the ritual?
Dancing
![Page 93: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/93.jpg)
… but what about the rest of the ritual?
Processions
Trial/initiation
![Page 94: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/94.jpg)
… but what about the rest of the ritual?
Dancing around a tall, decorated pole?
All these rituals are about forging group unity through shared experiences that connect them to their past while looking towards the future … but none of this is archaeologically recoverable!
![Page 95: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/95.jpg)
Even in such a ‘grain sacrifice’ thesis is accepted: process involved would not have been a simple one. McClatchie: although large portion of the grain was identifiable, significant portions showed evidence of abrasion => Unlikely to have occurred if it was charred and directly deposited into cists. Suggests: relatively significant period of time from initial charring to eventual deposition - resulted in partial damage to the grain.
![Page 96: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/96.jpg)
Many possibilities: allowing charred material to be exposed to the elements/collected and stored for a period. Possibility: grain ‘sacrificed’ in this manner was collected and stored until a death in the community & interred with/instead of body in cist. Strong ritual significance - interconnectedness of the community in both death+life, or reality+’afterlife’. Possibility: ceremony & ritual associated with funeral rites was a complex process – part of a multi-phased activity over a considerable period of time. Period between the initial cremation and the final burial of a token amount of cremated bone - skeletal remains and the pyre material were curated by the community. would explain: abraded grain - gathered up, packaged and transported. Ritual significance for community? Providing spiritual protection for a settlement/kin group. Possibly: substantial portion of human remains & pyre material were originally collected & deposited at significant (to the deceased/tribe) points in the landscape.
![Page 97: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/97.jpg)
Brendon Wilkins: pyre at Newford, county Galway c. 700g of human bone recovered 'token cremation burials’ feature of the MBA & LBA suggests: some deposited in cremation pits on the site remainder for non-funerary contexts. Bone as 'social artefact’: intended for ceremonial exchange between different groups to cement relationships/bonds of inheritance etc. May help explain anomalies: small amounts of human bone frequently turn up in non-funerary contexts. Interpretive possibilities are endless!
![Page 98: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/98.jpg)
Site Chronology & Phasing
Phase Ia c 1730-1536 (1650 cal BC) cal BC, Middle Bronze Age Erection of the large north-eastern post (C1935) and, possibly, the post in pit C1990
![Page 99: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/99.jpg)
Site Chronology & Phasing
Phase Ib c 1613-1461 cal BC (1550 cal BC), Middle Bronze Age Setting out of segmented inner ditch, with palisaded fence, based on C19272 central stakehole. Position of site determined by desire for alignments (stellar, lunar, astronomical or landscape?) based on existing posts in pits C1935 and C1990. Old wood? Possibly slightly early
![Page 100: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/100.jpg)
Site Chronology & Phasing
Phase Ic c 1442-1268 cal BC (c 1410 cal BC), Middle Bronze Age Token/cenotaphic burial in cists and pits within segmented circle. Laying out of north-eastern pit circle.
![Page 101: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/101.jpg)
Site Chronology & Phasing
Phase Id, Middle Bronze Age Working lifetime of ritual site (Phase I), during which time (50-100 years?) timber structures and alignment posts decay. Phase IIa, End of Middle Bronze Age (?) Digging of C1915 ditch to enclose segmented inner circle, north-eastern pit circle and C1935 post-pit behind palisaded fence. Possible removal of palisaded fence from segmented circle and backfilling with redeposited flint and pottery.
![Page 102: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/102.jpg)
Site Chronology & Phasing
Phase IIb, End of Middle Bronze Age (?) Working lifetime of ritual site (Phase II), during which time (50-100 years?) palisaded fence decays. Phase IIc, End of Middle Bronze Age (?) Removal of decaying posts from C1915 ditch and careful refilling of ditch with F1916 soil, F1909 shale stones and redeposition of pottery and flint artefacts, including deposition of natural, rounded stone at possible entrance way. Closing ceremony.
![Page 103: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/103.jpg)
Site Chronology & Phasing
Phase III c 385-113 cal BC (c 270 cal BC), Iron Age Bronze Age ritual centre no longer visible on ground surface. Partially built over by industrial structure.
![Page 104: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/104.jpg)
Publications: Chapple, R M 2004 ‘A cist is still a cist… the fundamental things apply: an enclosed late Bronze Age cist cemetery’ Archaeology Ireland 18.3, 32-35. Chapple, R M 2008a ‘The excavation of Early Neolithic and Early Bronze Age sites at Oakgrove, Gransha, Co. Londonderry’ Ulster Journal of Archaeology 67, 3rd Series, 22-59. Chapple, R M 2008b ‘‘Oakgrove’ cemetery’ Archaeology Ireland 22.4, 39. Chapple, R M 2008c ‘The absolute dating of archaeological excavations in Ulster carried out by Northern Archaeological Consultancy Ltd., 1998-2007’ Ulster Journal of Archaeology 67, 3rd Series, 153-181. Chapple, R M 2010 The excavation of an Enclosed Middle Bronze Age Cemetery at Gransha, Co. Londonderry, Northern Ireland
![Page 105: Gransha Lecture UAS 2012](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051413/5540652d550346f07d8b4b13/html5/thumbnails/105.jpg)
www.academia.edu
rmchapple.blogspot.com
Thank you all for listening!!!!