Transcript
Page 1: CONTENTdm vs DSpace vs Fedora Ralph LeVan OCLC Research

CONTENTdm vs CONTENTdm vs DSpace vs FedoraDSpace vs Fedora

Ralph LeVan

OCLC Research

Page 2: CONTENTdm vs DSpace vs Fedora Ralph LeVan OCLC Research

Data SupportData Support

Arbitrary Bitstreams?

Arbitrarily Complex Objects?

Versioning?

Local Metadata Elements?

Preservation Metadata?

Batch Input?

Rich Metadata Searching?

Full-text Searching?

Page 3: CONTENTdm vs DSpace vs Fedora Ralph LeVan OCLC Research

Arbitrary Bitstreams?Arbitrary Bitstreams?

CONTENTdm– yes

DSpace– yes

Fedora– yes

Page 4: CONTENTdm vs DSpace vs Fedora Ralph LeVan OCLC Research

Arbitrarily Complex Arbitrarily Complex Objects?Objects?

CONTENTdm– yes

DSpace– yes

Fedora– yes

Page 5: CONTENTdm vs DSpace vs Fedora Ralph LeVan OCLC Research

Versioning?Versioning?

CONTENTdm– no

DSpace– no

Fedora– yes

Page 6: CONTENTdm vs DSpace vs Fedora Ralph LeVan OCLC Research

Local Metadata Local Metadata Elements?Elements?

CONTENTdm– yes

DSpace– yes, but they can’t be searched

Fedora– no

Page 7: CONTENTdm vs DSpace vs Fedora Ralph LeVan OCLC Research

Preservation Preservation Metadata?Metadata?

CONTENTdm– no

DSpace– yes

Fedora– yes

Page 8: CONTENTdm vs DSpace vs Fedora Ralph LeVan OCLC Research

Batch Input?Batch Input?

CONTENTdm– yes?

DSpace– yes

Fedora– yes

Page 9: CONTENTdm vs DSpace vs Fedora Ralph LeVan OCLC Research

Rich Metadata Rich Metadata Searching?Searching?

CONTENTdm– yes

DSpace– yes, but only on a few fields

Fedora– yes, but only on a couple of fields

Page 10: CONTENTdm vs DSpace vs Fedora Ralph LeVan OCLC Research

Full-text Searching?Full-text Searching?

CONTENTdm– yes, by moving the content into the

metadata

DSpace– yes, through Google (in development)

Fedora– no

Page 11: CONTENTdm vs DSpace vs Fedora Ralph LeVan OCLC Research

User SupportUser Support

User Roles With Privileges?

Workflows?

Object Marshalling?

Arbitrary Bitstream Retrieval?

Arbitrary Object Retrieval?

Web Interface?

Content Easily Integrated Into Web Pages?

Page 12: CONTENTdm vs DSpace vs Fedora Ralph LeVan OCLC Research

User Roles With User Roles With Privileges?Privileges?

CONTENTdm– User permissions on directories

DSpace– yes

Fedora– no

Page 13: CONTENTdm vs DSpace vs Fedora Ralph LeVan OCLC Research

Mediated Workflows?Mediated Workflows?

CONTENTdm– no, but they have a three step commit

DSpace– yes

Fedora– no

Page 14: CONTENTdm vs DSpace vs Fedora Ralph LeVan OCLC Research

Object Marshalling?Object Marshalling?

CONTENTdm– yes

DSpace– yes

Fedora– no

Page 15: CONTENTdm vs DSpace vs Fedora Ralph LeVan OCLC Research

Arbitrary Bitstream Arbitrary Bitstream Retrieval?Retrieval?

CONTENTdm– Only file types recognized by the browser

DSpace– Only file types recognized by the browser

Fedora– Only file types recognized by the browser

Page 16: CONTENTdm vs DSpace vs Fedora Ralph LeVan OCLC Research

Arbitrary Object Arbitrary Object Retrieval?Retrieval?

CONTENTdm– Only types defined by CONTENTdm (books,

postcards, CDs, etc.)

DSpace– Web pages only

Fedora– yes

Page 17: CONTENTdm vs DSpace vs Fedora Ralph LeVan OCLC Research

Web Interface?Web Interface?

CONTENTdm– yes

DSpace– yes

Fedora– no

Page 18: CONTENTdm vs DSpace vs Fedora Ralph LeVan OCLC Research

Content Easily Content Easily Integrated Into Web Integrated Into Web Pages?Pages?

CONTENTdm– yes

DSpace– no

Fedora– possible

Page 19: CONTENTdm vs DSpace vs Fedora Ralph LeVan OCLC Research

Miscellaneous Miscellaneous InfrastructureInfrastructure

OAI-PMH?

Z39.50/SRW?

Open Source?

Open API’s?

Cross-Repository Searching?

Page 20: CONTENTdm vs DSpace vs Fedora Ralph LeVan OCLC Research

OAI-PMH?OAI-PMH?

CONTENTdm– yes

DSpace– yes

Fedora– yes

Page 21: CONTENTdm vs DSpace vs Fedora Ralph LeVan OCLC Research

Z39.50/SRW?Z39.50/SRW?

CONTENTdm– Z39.50 can be added

DSpace– SRW can be added

Fedora– no

Page 22: CONTENTdm vs DSpace vs Fedora Ralph LeVan OCLC Research

Open Source?Open Source?

CONTENTdm– no

DSpace– yes

Fedora– yes

Page 23: CONTENTdm vs DSpace vs Fedora Ralph LeVan OCLC Research

Open API’s?Open API’s?

CONTENTdm– By license

DSpace– SRW for searching

Fedora– Yes

Page 24: CONTENTdm vs DSpace vs Fedora Ralph LeVan OCLC Research

Cross-Repository Cross-Repository Searching?Searching?

CONTENTdm– Yes

DSpace– No

Fedora– No

Page 25: CONTENTdm vs DSpace vs Fedora Ralph LeVan OCLC Research

Data SupportData Support

CONTENTdm DSpace Fedora

Arbitrary Bitstreams? ● ● ●

Arbitrarily Complex Objects? ● ● ●

Versioning? ●

Local Metadata Elements? ● ●

Preservation Metadata? ● ●

Batch Input? ● ● ●

Rich Metadata Searching? ● ○ ○

Full-text Searching? ● ○

● = Yes ○ = Qualified Yes● = Yes ○ = Qualified Yes

Page 26: CONTENTdm vs DSpace vs Fedora Ralph LeVan OCLC Research

User SupportUser Support

CONTENTdm DSpace Fedora

User Roles With Privileges? ○ ●

Workflows? ●

Object Marshalling? ● ●

Arbitrary Bitstream Retrieval? ○ ○ ○

Arbitrary Object Retrieval? ●

Web Interface? ● ●

Content Easily Integrated Into Web Pages? ● ○

● = Yes ○ = Qualified Yes● = Yes ○ = Qualified Yes

Page 27: CONTENTdm vs DSpace vs Fedora Ralph LeVan OCLC Research

Miscellaneous Miscellaneous InfrastructureInfrastructure

CONTENTdm DSpace Fedora

OAI-PMH? ● ● ●

Z39.50/SRW? ● ●

Open Source? ● ●

Open API’s? ○ ●

Cross-Repository Searching? ●

● = Yes ○ = Qualified Yes● = Yes ○ = Qualified Yes

Page 28: CONTENTdm vs DSpace vs Fedora Ralph LeVan OCLC Research

Prioritized List Of New Prioritized List Of New FeaturesFeatures

1. Preservation Plan

2. Open Rendering Scheme

3. Open API’s

4. Workflow and User Roles

5. Versioning


Top Related