Building Information - Marietta City SD (44321) - Washington Elementary School
Program Type Classroom Facilities Assistance Program (CFAP) - Regular
Setting Small City
Assessment Name Washington Elementary School
Assessment Date (on-site; non-EEA) 2017-11-06
Kitchen Type Warming Kitchen
Cost Set: 2019
Building Name Washington Elementary School
Building IRN 39578
Building Address 401 Washington St.
Building City Marietta
Building Zipcode 45750
Building Phone 740-374-6520
Acreage 0.73
Current Grades: K-5
Teaching Stations 26
Number of Floors 3
Student Capacity 469
Current Enrollment 335
Enrollment Date 2017-11-06
Enrollment Date is the date in which the current enrollment was taken.
Number of Classrooms 26
Historical Register NO
Building’s Principal Ms. Alicia McIntire
Building Type Elementary
Next Page
Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:24Building Information - Marietta City SD (44321) - Washington Elementary School Page 1
Building Pictures - Marietta City SD(44321) - Washington Elementary School(39578)
North elevation photo: East elevation photo:
South elevation photo: West elevation photo:
GENERAL DESCRIPTION
47,017 Total Existing Square Footage
1912,1956 Building Dates
K-5 Grades
335 Current Enrollment
26 Teaching Stations
0.73 Site Acreage
Washington Elementary School, which is not on the National Register of Historic Buildings, and originally constructed in 1912, is a 3 story, 47,017 square foot brick school buildinglocated in a small town residential setting. The existing facility features a conventionally partitioned design, and does not utilize modular buildings. The structure of the overallfacility contains masonry type exterior wall construction, with CMU and masonry/plaster type wall construction in the interior. The floor system consists of structural concrete panand slab-on grade. The roof structure is structural concrete and bar joists with metal deck. The roofing system of the overall facility is fully adhered rolled asphalt system, sprayfoam over-topping, and standing seam metal, installed in 1994, 2006, and 2015. The ventilation system of the building is inadequate to meet the needs of the users. TheClassrooms are undersized in terms of the current standards established by the State of Ohio. Physical Education and Student Dining spaces consist of one Multipurpose space.The electrical system for the facility is inadequate. The facility is equipped with a non-compliant security system. The building has a non-compliant manual fire alarm system. Thefacility is not equipped with an automated fire suppression system, except for a limited area system in the ground floor mechanical room. The building contains asbestos. Theoverall building is not compliant with ADA accessibility requirements. The school is located on a 1.5 acre site adjacent to residential properties. The property and playgrounds arepartially fenced for security. Access onto the site is unrestricted. Site circulation is poor. There is no dedicated space for school buses to load and unload on the site. Parking forstaff, visitors and community events is inadequate.
No Significant Findings
Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:24Building Pictures - Marietta City SD(44321) - Washington Elementary School(39578) Page 2
Previous Page
Next Page
Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:24Building Pictures - Marietta City SD(44321) - Washington Elementary School(39578) Page 3
Building Construction Information - Marietta City SD (44321) - Washington Elementary School (39578)
Name Year Handicapped Access Floors Square Feet Non OSDM Addition Built Under ELPP
Original Building 1912 no 3 38,557 no no
Addition 1 1956 no 1 8,460 no no
Previous Page
Next Page
Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:24Building Construction Information - Marietta City SD (44321) - Washington Elementary School (39578) Page 4
Building Component Information - Marietta City SD (44321) - Washington Elementary School (39578)
AdditionAuditorium
Fixed Seating
CorridorsAgriculturalEducation
Lab
PrimaryGymnasium
MediaCenter
VocationalSpace
StudentDining
Kitchen NatatoriumIndoorTracks
AdultEducation
BoardOffices
OutsideAgencies
AuxiliaryGymnasium
Original Building (1912)
6883 4953 2129 986
Addition 1 (1956) 168
Total 0 7,051 0 4,953 2,129 0 0 986 0 0 0 0 0 0
Master Planning Considerations
Previous Page
Next Page
Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:24Building Component Information - Marietta City SD (44321) - Washington Elementary School (39578) Page 5
Existing CT Programs for AssessmentNext Page
Previous Page
Program Type Program Name Related Space Square Feet
No Records Found
Legend:
Not in current design manual
In current design manual but missing from assessment
Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:24<Untitled> Page 6
Main Assessment Menu - Marietta City SD (44321) - Washington Elementary School (39578)
Building Summary - Washington Elementary School (39578)
District: Marietta City SD
Name: Washington Elementary School
Address: 401 Washington St.
Marietta,OH 45750
Bldg. IRN: 39578
County: Washington Area: Southeastern Ohio (6)
Contact: Ms. Alicia McIntire
Phone: 740-374-6520
Date Prepared: 2017-11-06 By: Tony Schorr
Date Revised: 2017-12-19 By: Laura Kretz
Current Grades K-5 Acreage: 0.73
Proposed Grades N/A Teaching Stations: 26
Current Enrollment 335 Classrooms: 26
Projected Enrollment N/A
Addition Date HA Number of Floors Current Square Feet
Original Building 1912 no 3 38,557
Addition 1 1956 no 1 8,460
Total 47,017
*HA = Handicapped Access
*Rating =1 Satisfactory
=2 Needs Repair
=3 Needs Replacement
*Const P/S = Present/Scheduled Construction
FACILITY ASSESSMENTCost Set: 2019 Rating
Dollar Assessment C
A. Heating System 3 $1,645,595.00 -
B. Roofing 3 $119,070.00 -
C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning 1 $0.00 -
D. Electrical Systems 3 $791,296.11 -
E. Plumbing and Fixtures 3 $334,219.00 -
F. Windows 3 $451,500.00 -
G. Structure: Foundation 1 $0.00 -
H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys 3 $135,012.50 -
I. Structure: Floors and Roofs 1 $0.00 -
J. General Finishes 1 $950,719.10 -
K. Interior Lighting 3 $305,610.50 -
L. Security Systems 3 $181,015.45 -
M. Emergency/Egress Lighting 3 $47,017.00 -
N. Fire Alarm 3 $105,788.25 -
O. Handicapped Access 3 $251,000.00 -
P. Site Condition 3 $418,056.60 -
Q. Sewage System 1 $0.00 -
R. Water Supply 1 $0.00 -
S. Exterior Doors 3 $47,500.00 -
T. Hazardous Material 3 $15,000.00 -
U. Life Safety 3 $220,454.40 -
V. Loose Furnishings 3 $305,610.50 -
W. Technology 3 $658,238.00 -
- X. Construction Contingency /Non-Construction Cost
- $1,705,895.15 -
Total $8,688,597.56
Suitability Appraisal Summary
Section Points Possible Points Earned Percentage Rating Category
Cover Sheet — — — —
1.0 The School Site 100 47 47% Poor
2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features 200 99 50% Borderline
3.0 Plant Maintainability 100 41 41% Poor
4.0 Building Safety and Security 200 120 60% Borderline
5.0 Educational Adequacy 200 106 53% Borderline
6.0 Environment for Education 200 119 60% Borderline
LEED Observations — — — —
Commentary — — — —
Total 1000 532 53% Borderline
Enhanced Environmental Hazards Assessment Cost Estimates
C=Under Contract
Renovation Cost Factor 101.86%
Cost to Renovate (Cost Factor applied) $8,850,205.47
The Replacement Cost Per SF and the Renovate/Replace ratio are only provided when this summary is
requested from a Master Plan.
Previous Page
Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:24Main Assessment Menu - Marietta City SD (44321) - Washington Elementary School (39578) Page 7
Main Assessment Menu - Marietta City SD (44321) - Washington Elementary School (39578)
Original Building (1912) Summary
District: Marietta City SD
Name: Washington Elementary School
Address: 401 Washington St.
Marietta,OH 45750
Bldg. IRN: 39578
County: Washington Area: Southeastern Ohio (6)
Contact: Ms. Alicia McIntire
Phone: 740-374-6520
Date Prepared: 2017-11-06 By: Tony Schorr
Date Revised: 2017-12-19 By: Laura Kretz
Current Grades K-5 Acreage: 0.73
Proposed Grades N/A Teaching Stations: 26
Current Enrollment 335 Classrooms: 26
Projected Enrollment N/A
Addition Date HA Number of Floors Current Square Feet
Original Building 1912 no 3 38,557
Addition 1 1956 no 1 8,460
Total 47,017
*HA = Handicapped Access
*Rating =1 Satisfactory
=2 Needs Repair
=3 Needs Replacement
*Const P/S = Present/Scheduled Construction
FACILITY ASSESSMENTCost Set: 2019 Rating
Dollar Assessment C
A. Heating System 3 $1,349,495.00 -
B. Roofing 3 $26,800.00 -
C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning 1 $0.00 -
D. Electrical Systems 3 $648,914.31 -
E. Plumbing and Fixtures 3 $274,999.00 -
F. Windows 3 $406,000.00 -
G. Structure: Foundation 1 $0.00 -
H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys 3 $87,762.50 -
I. Structure: Floors and Roofs 1 $0.00 -
J. General Finishes 1 $682,036.10 -
K. Interior Lighting 3 $250,620.50 -
L. Security Systems 3 $148,444.45 -
M. Emergency/Egress Lighting 3 $38,557.00 -
N. Fire Alarm 3 $86,753.25 -
O. Handicapped Access 3 $200,700.00 -
P. Site Condition 3 $352,599.80 -
Q. Sewage System 1 $0.00 -
R. Water Supply 1 $0.00 -
S. Exterior Doors 3 $25,000.00 -
T. Hazardous Material 3 $0.00 -
U. Life Safety 3 $193,382.40 -
V. Loose Furnishings 3 $250,620.50 -
W. Technology 3 $539,798.00 -
- X. Construction Contingency /Non-Construction Cost
- $1,358,931.24 -
Total $6,921,414.05
Suitability Appraisal Summary
Section Points Possible Points Earned Percentage Rating Category
Cover Sheet — — — —
1.0 The School Site 100 47 47% Poor
2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features 200 99 50% Borderline
3.0 Plant Maintainability 100 41 41% Poor
4.0 Building Safety and Security 200 120 60% Borderline
5.0 Educational Adequacy 200 106 53% Borderline
6.0 Environment for Education 200 119 60% Borderline
LEED Observations — — — —
Commentary — — — —
Total 1000 532 53% Borderline
Enhanced Environmental Hazards Assessment Cost Estimates
C=Under Contract
Renovation Cost Factor 101.86%
Cost to Renovate (Cost Factor applied) $7,050,152.35
The Replacement Cost Per SF and the Renovate/Replace ratio are only provided when this summary is
requested from a Master Plan.
Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:24Main Assessment Menu - Marietta City SD (44321) - Washington Elementary School (39578) Page 8
Main Assessment Menu - Marietta City SD (44321) - Washington Elementary School (39578)
Addition 1 (1956) Summary
District: Marietta City SD
Name: Washington Elementary School
Address: 401 Washington St.
Marietta,OH 45750
Bldg. IRN: 39578
County: Washington Area: Southeastern Ohio (6)
Contact: Ms. Alicia McIntire
Phone: 740-374-6520
Date Prepared: 2017-11-06 By: Tony Schorr
Date Revised: 2017-12-19 By: Laura Kretz
Current Grades K-5 Acreage: 0.73
Proposed Grades N/A Teaching Stations: 26
Current Enrollment 335 Classrooms: 26
Projected Enrollment N/A
Addition Date HA Number of Floors Current Square Feet
Original Building 1912 no 3 38,557
Addition 1 1956 no 1 8,460
Total 47,017
*HA = Handicapped Access
*Rating =1 Satisfactory
=2 Needs Repair
=3 Needs Replacement
*Const P/S = Present/Scheduled Construction
FACILITY ASSESSMENTCost Set: 2019 Rating
Dollar Assessment C
A. Heating System 3 $296,100.00 -
B. Roofing 3 $92,270.00 -
C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning 1 $0.00 -
D. Electrical Systems 3 $142,381.80 -
E. Plumbing and Fixtures 3 $59,220.00 -
F. Windows 3 $45,500.00 -
G. Structure: Foundation 1 $0.00 -
H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys 3 $47,250.00 -
I. Structure: Floors and Roofs 1 $0.00 -
J. General Finishes 1 $268,683.00 -
K. Interior Lighting 3 $54,990.00 -
L. Security Systems 3 $32,571.00 -
M. Emergency/Egress Lighting 3 $8,460.00 -
N. Fire Alarm 3 $19,035.00 -
O. Handicapped Access 3 $50,300.00 -
P. Site Condition 3 $65,456.80 -
Q. Sewage System 1 $0.00 -
R. Water Supply 1 $0.00 -
S. Exterior Doors 3 $22,500.00 -
T. Hazardous Material 3 $15,000.00 -
U. Life Safety 3 $27,072.00 -
V. Loose Furnishings 3 $54,990.00 -
W. Technology 3 $118,440.00 -
- X. Construction Contingency /Non-Construction Cost
- $346,963.91 -
Total $1,767,183.51
Suitability Appraisal Summary
Section Points Possible Points Earned Percentage Rating Category
Cover Sheet — — — —
1.0 The School Site 100 47 47% Poor
2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features 200 99 50% Borderline
3.0 Plant Maintainability 100 41 41% Poor
4.0 Building Safety and Security 200 120 60% Borderline
5.0 Educational Adequacy 200 106 53% Borderline
6.0 Environment for Education 200 119 60% Borderline
LEED Observations — — — —
Commentary — — — —
Total 1000 532 53% Borderline
Enhanced Environmental Hazards Assessment Cost Estimates
C=Under Contract
Renovation Cost Factor 101.86%
Cost to Renovate (Cost Factor applied) $1,800,053.12
The Replacement Cost Per SF and the Renovate/Replace ratio are only provided when this summary is
requested from a Master Plan.
Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:24Main Assessment Menu - Marietta City SD (44321) - Washington Elementary School (39578) Page 9
Facility Assessment
A. Heating System
Description: The existing system for the overall structure consists of two Lochinvar gas-fired boilers installed in 2014 and two base-mounted pumps which arein good condition. The boilers supply water to finned radiation throughout the building. One air handling unit was installed in 1994 to provideheating and ventilation to the classrooms, and the gymnasium is heated and ventilated by a separate air handler. The HVAC system does providethe required CFM as per OSFC design standards. The system temperature controls are DDC, installed in 1994 and are in good condition. Thestructure is not equipped with air conditioning.
Rating: 3 Needs Replacement
Recommendations: Provide new overall HVAC System to meet OSDM guidelines including air conditioning.
Item Cost Unit Whole Building
Original Building (1912)38,557 ft²
Addition 1 (1956)8,460 ft²
Sum Comments
HVAC System Replacement:
$27.00sq.ft. (of entirebuilding addition)
Required Required $1,269,459.00(includes demo of existing system and reconfiguration of piping layoutand new controls, air conditioning)
Convert To Ducted System
$8.00sq.ft. (of entirebuilding addition)
Required Required $376,136.00(includes costs for vert. & horz. chases, cut openings, soffits, etc. Mustbe used in addition to HVAC System Replacement if the existing HVACsystem is non-ducted)
Sum: $1,645,595.00$1,349,495.00 $296,100.00
Hot water boilers Finned radiation
Back to Assessment Summary
Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:24Facility Assessment Page 10
Facility Assessment
B. Roofing
Description: The roof over the Original Construction is a fully adhered rolled asphalt system installed in 1994 and is in poor condition. The roof over the 1956gym addition is a spray foam system installed over an existing built-up roof installed in 2006 and is in poor condition. The roof over the 1956kitchen portion is a metal roofing system installed in 2015 and is in good condition. There are no District reports of current leaking. Signs of pastleaking were observed during the physical assessment. Access to the roof was gained by access hatch and access ladder that are in poorcondition. Fall safety protection cages are not required. There were observations of standing water on the roof. Metal cap flashings and stonecopings are in poor condition. Roof storm drainage is addressed through a system of gutters and downspouts and roof drains, which are properlylocated, and in poor condition. The roof is not equipped with overflow roof drains. No problems requiring attention were encountered with any roofpenetrations. There are not any covered walkways attached to this structure. The gym connector is part of the 1956 addition.
Rating: 3 Needs Replacement
Recommendations: The roof over the overall facility requires replacement to meet Ohio School Design Manual guidelines for age of system and due to condition,except for the metal roof over the kitchen. AND The flashing at the 1956 Addition require replacement due to condition. AND Due to existingconditions gutters and downspouts and roof drains require replacement.
Item Cost Unit Whole BuildingOriginal Building (1912)38,557 ft²
Addition 1 (1956)8,460 ft²
Sum Comments
Membrane (all types / fully adhered): $10.00sq.ft. (Qty) 0 Required 6,772 Required $67,720.00(unless under 10,000 sq.ft.)
Repair/replace cap flashing and coping: $18.40ln.ft. 350 Required $6,440.00
Gutters/Downspouts $13.10ln.ft. 100 Required $1,310.00
Remove/replace existing roof Drains and Sump:$1,200.00each 6 Required 4 Required $12,000.00
Overflow Roof Drains and Piping: $3,000.00each 6 Required 4 Required $30,000.00
Roof Access Ladder with Fall Protection Cage: $100.00ln.ft. 16 Required $1,600.00(remove and replace)
Sum: $119,070.00 $26,800.00 $92,270.00
1956 Gym Roof 1912 Roof Off of Office
Back to Assessment Summary
Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:24Facility Assessment Page 11
Facility Assessment
C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning
Description: The overall facility is not equipped with air conditioning. Window units are provided for administrative offices, computer room and teacher’slounge. The gymnasium is served by a separate heating and ventilating unit.
Rating: 1 Satisfactory
Recommendations: Provide an air conditioning system to meet with OSFC design manual. Pricing for this is included in Item A.
Item CostUnitWhole BuildingOriginal Building (1912)38,557 ft²
Addition 1 (1956)8,460 ft²
SumComments
Sum: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
DDC system Main air handling unit
Back to Assessment Summary
Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:24Facility Assessment Page 12
Facility Assessment
D. Electrical Systems
Description: The facility’s main electrical service is 600 Amps 240/120 Volt three phase four wire. A new service panel board was installed in 1994. There aresome new panels installed. Original panels have been back fed from new electrical service equipment. The existing electrical service is notadequate for future HVAC and technology loads. Some surface-mounted raceways have been installed for outlets. However, there are still notenough receptacles in classrooms.
Rating: 3 Needs Replacement
Recommendations: Provide 1800 Amp 480/277 electrical service to accommodate future HVAC loads. Provide pad-mounted oil-filled transformer of appropriate sizeto accommodate the new electrical service. Provide new distribution panels. Provide wire, conduit and all associated equipment for a completeelectrical distribution system.
Item Cost Unit Whole Building
Original Building (1912)38,557 ft²
Addition 1 (1956)8,460 ft²
Sum Comments
System Replacement:
$16.23sq.ft. (of entirebuilding addition)
Required Required $763,085.91(Includes demo of existing system. Includes generator for life safety systems.Does not include telephone or data or equipment) (Use items below ONLY whenthe entire system is NOT being replaced)
Lightning Protection
$0.60sq.ft. (of entirebuilding addition)
Required Required $28,210.20
Sum: $791,296.11 $648,914.31 $142,381.80
Main switchboard Classroom receptacle
Back to Assessment Summary
Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:24Facility Assessment Page 13
Facility Assessment
E. Plumbing and Fixtures
Description: The boys’ restrooms contain six wall-mounted and two floor-mounted flush valve water closets, six wall-mounted and four floor-mounted flushvalve urinals and four counter top lavatories and two wall hung lavatories. The wall-mounted fixtures are in good condition; the floor-mountedfixtures are in poor condition. The girls’ restrooms contain eleven wall-mounted flush valve water closet, three floor-mounted water closets andfour countertop lavatories and two wall hung lavatories. The wall-mounted fixtures are in good condition; the floor-mounted toilets are in poorcondition. The staff restrooms contain six wall-mounted flush valve and six flush valve, water closets and they are in good condition. The schoolcontains five water coolers and one drinking fountain, and they are in good condition. The school contains two water heaters: one electrictank-type 40 gallon storage capacity in good condition and one gas-fired tank-type 30,000 BTUH input 30 gallon storage tank. The electric heateris in good condition and the gas-fired heater is in poor condition. A backflow preventer is provided and the domestic water service entrance and isin good condition. Galvanized piping was noticed throughout.
Rating: 3 Needs Replacement
Recommendations: Provide new toilets to replace existing floor-mounted toilets. Provide new urinals to replace existing floor-mounted urinals. Provide one new waterheater to replace existing gas-fired heater. See ’’O’’ Handicap Access for additional fixture replacement. Replace domestic water supply pipingand sanitary piping for the entire building.
Item Cost Unit Whole BuildingOriginal Building (1912)38,557 ft²
Addition 1 (1956)8,460 ft²
Sum Comments
Domestic Supply Piping: $3.50sq.ft. (of entire building addition) Required Required $164,559.50(remove / replace)
Sanitary Waste Piping: $3.50sq.ft. (of entire building addition) Required Required $164,559.50(remove / replace)
Domestic Water Heater: $5,100.00per unit 1 Required 0 Required $5,100.00(remove / replace)
Sum: $334,219.00 $274,999.00 $59,220.00
Floor mounted urinals Wall hung lavatories
Back to Assessment Summary
Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:24Facility Assessment Page 14
Facility Assessment
F. Windows
Description: The overall facility is equipped with aluminum and steel and wood with single glazed type window systems, which was installed in 1956 and 1991,and is in poor condition. Window system seals are in poor condition, with moderate air and water infiltration being experienced. Window systemhardware is in poor condition. The window system features no blinds. The window system is not equipped with insect screens on operablewindows. This facility is not equipped with any curtain wall systems. This facility does not feature any glass block windows. The school does notcontain skylights. Window security grilles are provided for some ground floor windows, and are in poor condition. There is not a Greenhouseassociated with this school.
Rating: 3 Needs Replacement
Recommendations: Provide a new insulated window system with integral blinds to meet with Ohio School Design Manual requirements.
Item Cost Unit Whole BuildingOriginal Building (1912)38,557 ft²
Addition 1 (1956)8,460 ft²
Sum Comments
Insulated Glass/Panels:$70.00sq.ft. (Qty) 5,800 Required 650 Required $451,500.00(includes blinds)
Sum: $451,500.00 $406,000.00 $45,500.00
Windows at Lower Level, 1912 Building High Bay Gym Windows
Back to Assessment Summary
Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:24Facility Assessment Page 15
Facility Assessment
G. Structure: Foundation
Description: The overall facility is equipped concrete foundation walls on concrete footings, which displayed no locations of significant differential settlement,cracking, or leaking, and are in satisfactory condition. The District reports that there has been no past leaking. No grading or site drainagedeficiencies were noted around the perimeter of the structure that are contributing or could contribute to foundation / wall structural deterioration.
Rating: 1 Satisfactory
Recommendations: Existing conditions require no renovation or replacement at the present time.
Item CostUnitWhole BuildingOriginal Building (1912)38,557 ft²
Addition 1 (1956)8,460 ft²
SumComments
Sum: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
1912 Foundation 1956 Kitchen Wall
Back to Assessment Summary
Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:24Facility Assessment Page 16
Facility Assessment
H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys
Description: The overall facility has a brick veneer on a masonry bearing wall system, which displayed a few locations of deterioration, and is in adequatecondition. The exterior masonry appears to have appropriately spaced and inadequately caulked control joints in poor condition. Control joints areprovided at lintel locations at doors and windows and are in poor condition. The school does have sufficient expansion joints, and they are inadequate condition. The exterior masonry has not been cleaned and sealed in recent years, and shows evidence of mortar deterioration invarious locations. Architectural exterior accent materials consist of stone, which is in adequate to poor condition. Interior walls are concretemasonry units and glazed block in the 1956 addition and masonry primarily partitions with plaster in the 1912 building, and are in poor condition.Interior masonry appears to have adequately spaced and caulked control joints in adequate condition. Soffits are in adequate condition. Thewindow sills are stone, and are in poor condition. The exterior lintels are steel, and are in adequate to poor condition. Chimneys are in adequatecondition. Canopies over a few entrances are steel type construction, and are in poor condition.
Rating: 3 Needs Replacement
Recommendations: Provide tuckpointing in all areas of mortar deterioration as required through the overall facility. AND Provide masonry cleaning, sealing, caulkingas required through the overall facility. AND Recaulk existing control joints. AND Replace masonry lintels as required in the 1956 Addition.
Item Cost Unit Whole BuildingOriginal Building (1912)38,557 ft²
Addition 1 (1956)8,460 ft²
Sum Comments
Tuckpointing: $7.50sq.ft. (Qty) 4,185 Required 1,380 Required $41,737.50(wall surface)
Exterior Masonry Cleaning: $1.50sq.ft. (Qty) 22,550 Required 8,560 Required $46,665.00(wall surface)
Exterior Masonry Sealing: $1.00sq.ft. (Qty) 22,550 Required 8,560 Required $31,110.00(wall surface)
Exterior Caulking: $7.50ln.ft. 80 Required $600.00(removing and replacing)
Lintel Replacement: $250.00ln.ft. 50 Required $12,500.00(total removal and replacement including pinning and shoring)
Install Control Joints $60.00ln.ft. 40 Required $2,400.00
Sum: $135,012.50 $87,762.50 $47,250.00
1956 Gym Wall Movement 1912 Building
Back to Assessment Summary
Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:24Facility Assessment Page 17
Facility Assessment
I. Structure: Floors and Roofs
Description: The floor construction of the base floor of the 1912 Addition is a half-story below grade and is concrete slab. There is no crawl space. The floorconstruction of the first and second floors of the 1912 Addition cast-in-place concrete type construction, and is in good condition. The floorconstruction of the base floor of the 1956 Addition is concrete slab on grade type construction, and is in good condition. There is no crawl space.Ceiling to structural deck spaces are sufficient to accommodate HVAC, electrical, and plumbing scopes of work in required renovations. The roofconstruction of the 1912 Addition is cast-in-place concrete type construction, and is in good condition. The roof construction of the 1956 Additionis metal deck on steel joists type construction and is in adequate condition.
Rating: 1 Satisfactory
Recommendations: Existing conditions require no renovation or replacement at the present time.
Item CostUnitWhole BuildingOriginal Building (1912)38,557 ft²
Addition 1 (1956)8,460 ft²
SumComments
Sum: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Wood Corridor Floor, 1912 Building 1956 Steel Joist Framing Above Metal Panel Ceiling
Back to Assessment Summary
Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:24Facility Assessment Page 18
Facility Assessment
J. General Finishes
Description: The overall facility features conventionally partitioned Classrooms with carpet, concrete and VCT type flooring, plaster and ACT type ceilings, aswell as plaster type wall finishes, and they are in poor condition. The overall facility has Corridors with wood type flooring, plaster type ceilings, aswell as plaster type wall finishes, and they are in poor condition. The overall facility has Restrooms with ceramic and 8’’ VAT tile type flooring,plaster and ACT type ceilings, as well as plaster and glazed tile type wall finishes, and they are in poor condition. Toilet partitions are metal, andare in poor condition. Classroom casework in the overall facility is not present, so is inadequately provided. The typical Classroom contains 0lineal feet of casework. Classrooms are provided adequate chalkboards, markerboards, and tackboards, which are in poor condition. Thecloakrooms, located in the Classrooms are inadequately provided, and in poor condition. The Art program is not equipped with a kiln. The facilityis equipped with wood louvered non-louvered interior doors that are mostly flush -with proper ADA hardware (at classrooms only) and clearances,and in poor condition. The Gymnasium space(s) have original 8’’ VAT type flooring, metal panel type ceilings, as well as CMU type wall finishes,and they are in poor condition. Gymnasium basketball backboards are manually operated type, and are in poor condition. The Media Center,located in the 1912 Addition, has carpet type flooring, ACT type ceilings, as well as painted brick masonry type wall finishes, and they are in poorcondition. Student Dining, located in the 1956 Addition, shares the Gymnasium space. OSDM-required fixed equipment for Stage is inadequatelyprovided, and in poor condition. The existing Kitchen is a Warming Kitchen only, is undersized based on current enrollment, and the existingKitchen equipment, installed in 1991, is in poor condition. The Kitchen hood is in fair condition, and is not equipped with the required UL 300compliant wet chemical fire suppression system. The required 6’’ overhang on all three exposed sides of the cooking equipment is not providedby the hood. Kitchen hood exhaust ductwork is of proper construction / material / and/or installed as required by the OSDM and OBMC. Walk-incoolers / freezers are not provided.
Rating: 1 Satisfactory
Recommendations: Provide complete replacement of finishes and casework due to installation of systems outlined in Items A, C, D, E, I, K, L, M, N, T, U.
Item Cost Unit Whole Building
OriginalBuilding (1912)38,557 ft²
Addition 1 (1956)8,460 ft²
Sum Comments
Complete Replacement ofFinishes and Casework (Elementary):
$17.10sq.ft. (of entirebuilding addition)
Required Required $803,990.70(elementary, per building area, with removal of existing)
Toilet Partitions: $1,000.00per stall 15 Required 5 Required $20,000.00(removing and replacing)
Toilet Accessory Replacement
$0.20sq.ft. (of entirebuilding addition)
Required Required $9,403.40(per building area)
Basketball Backboard Replacement
$3,200.00each 2 Required $6,400.00(non-electric)
Total Warming Kitchen Replacement
$112.50sq.ft. (Qty) 986 Required $110,925.00(square footage based upon only existing area of foodpreparation, serving, kitchen storage areas and walk-ins. Includesdemolition and removal of existing kitchen equipment)
Sum: $950,719.10 $682,036.10 $268,683.00
1912 Typical Classroom 1956 Gym
Back to Assessment Summary
Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:24Facility Assessment Page 19
Facility Assessment
K. Interior Lighting
Description: This facility’s lighting system is comprised of 2X4 lay-in fluorescent fixtures and 1X4 surface-mounted fluorescent fixtures in classrooms providing60 footcandles and 50 footcandles respectively, High Intensity Discharge (HID) surface-mounted fixtures in the gymnasium/dining providing 20footcandles, and 1X4 fluorescent pendant fixtures in some classrooms providing 46 footcandles. Corridor is comprised of suspended incandescent fixture and Mechanical/Storage Room are incandescent fixture. Main Office lighting is 2 x 4 parabolic in good condition. Kitchen is 2 x4 lay-in providing 16-26 footcandles. This facility has many types of fixtures installed including incandescent. Most of the lighting fixtures are oldand in poor condition.
Rating: 3 Needs Replacement
Recommendations: Completely replace lighting system due to the installation of a fire suppression system and new HVAC system. Refer to Item J and U.
Item Cost Unit Whole Building
Original Building (1912)38,557 ft²
Addition 1 (1956)8,460 ft²
Sum Comments
Complete Building Lighting Replacement
$6.50sq.ft. (of entire building addition)
Required Required $305,610.50Includes demo of existingfixtures
Sum: $305,610.50 $250,620.50 $54,990.00
Gymnasium lighting Classroom lighting
Back to Assessment Summary
Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:24Facility Assessment Page 20
Facility Assessment
L. Security Systems
Description: The security system is comprised of(16) CCTV and (1) main door remote access location. The system is not fully compliant with OSDMguidelines. The site lighting is not adequate for security purposes. Office location does not allow for secured entry.
Rating: 3 Needs Replacement
Recommendations: Provide new security system and new site lighting to meet the requirements as outlined in the OFCC Design Manual.
Item Cost Unit Whole BuildingOriginal Building (1912)38,557 ft²
Addition 1 (1956)8,460 ft²
Sum Comments
Security System: $2.85sq.ft. (of entire building addition) Required Required $133,998.45(complete, area of building)
Exterior Site Lighting:$1.00sq.ft. (of entire building addition) Required Required $47,017.00(complete, area of building)
Sum: $181,015.45 $148,444.45 $32,571.00
Exterior camera Exterior wall pack
Back to Assessment Summary
Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:24Facility Assessment Page 21
Facility Assessment
M. Emergency/Egress Lighting
Description: The emergency egress lighting system is comprised of dual head emergency fixtures with battery back-up. The exit signs are powered bydedicated circuits. Existing system part of 1993 upgrades. Emergency lighting would need replaced due to extent of interior renovations.
Rating: 3 Needs Replacement
Recommendations: Provide new emergency/egress lighting due to extent of interior renovation work.
Item Cost Unit Whole BuildingOriginal Building (1912)38,557 ft²
Addition 1 (1956)8,460 ft²
Sum Comments
Emergency/Egress Lighting:$1.00sq.ft. (of entire building addition) Required Required $47,017.00(complete, area of building)
Sum: $47,017.00 $38,557.00 $8,460.00
Emergency lighting Emergency lighting
Back to Assessment Summary
Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:24Facility Assessment Page 22
Facility Assessment
N. Fire Alarm
Description: The facility has a Simplex zoned general fire alarm system and pull stations at all exits. There are not strobes in classrooms. There are no smokedetectors in corridors. The system does not provide adequate coverage for the facility.
Rating: 3 Needs Replacement
Recommendations: Provide complete fire alarm system replacement to meet OBC, NFPA, and OSDM.
Item Cost Unit Whole BuildingOriginal Building (1912)38,557 ft²
Addition 1 (1956)8,460 ft²
Sum Comments
Fire Alarm System:$2.25sq.ft. (of entire building addition) Required Required $105,788.25(complete new system, including removal of existing)
Sum: $105,788.25 $86,753.25 $19,035.00
Pull station and A/V device Main fire alarm panel
Back to Assessment Summary
Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:24Facility Assessment Page 23
Facility Assessment
O. Handicapped Access
Description: At the site, there is not an accessible route provided from the public right-of-way, the accessible parking areas, and from the passenger unloadingzone to the main entrance of the school. There is not an accessible route connecting all or most areas of the site. The exterior entrances are notADA accessible. Access from the parking / drop-off area to the building entries is compromised by steps. Adequate handicap parking is notprovided. Exterior doors are not equipped with ADA hardware. The main entry is not equipped with an ADA power assist door. Playground layoutand equipping are not compliant. On the interior of the building, space allowances and reach ranges are not compliant. There is not an accessibleroute through the building. Ground and floor surfaces are mostly compliant. Ramps and stairs do not meet all ADA requirements. Elevationchanges within the overall facility are facilitated by non-compliant stairwells in poor condition. This multistory building has does not have acompliant elevator that accesses every floor. Access to the Stage is not facilitated by a chair lift or ramp. Interior doors are not recessed, aremostly provided adequate clearances, and are mostly provided with ADA-compliant hardware. 13 ADA-compliant toilets are required, and 0 arecurrently provided. 13 ADA-compliant lavatories are required, and 0 are currently provided. 3 ADA-compliant urinals are required, and 0 arecurrently provided. 0 ADA-compliant showers are required, and 0 are currently provided. 5 ADA-compliant electric water coolers are required, and3 are currently provided. Toilet partitions are metal, and do not provide appropriate ADA clearances. ADA-compliant accessories are notadequately provided and mounted. Mirrors do not meet ADA requirements for mounting heights. Health Clinic and Special Education restroomsare not compliant with ADA requirements. ADA signage is not provided on both the interior and the exterior of the building.
Rating: 3 Needs Replacement
Recommendations: Provide ADA-compliant signage, power assist door opener, ramps, chair lifts, elevators, electric water coolers, toilets, sinks, urinals, toiletpartitions, toilet accessories to facilitate the school’s meeting of ADA requirements. Parking issues are corrected in Item P.
Item Cost Unit Whole BuildingOriginal Building (1912)38,557 ft²
Addition 1 (1956)8,460 ft²
Sum Comments
Ramps: $40.00sq.ft. (Qty) 185 Required 100 Required $11,400.00(per ramp/interior-exterior complete)
Lifts: $15,000.00unit 1 Required 2 Required $45,000.00(complete)
Elevators: $42,000.00each 3 Required $126,000.00(per stop, $84,000 minimum)
Electric Water Coolers: $1,800.00unit 1 Required 1 Required $3,600.00(replacement double ADA)
Toilet/Urinals/Sinks: $1,500.00unit 22 Required 7 Required $43,500.00(replacement ADA)
Toilet Partitions: $1,000.00stall 5 Required 2 Required $7,000.00(ADA - grab bars, accessories included)
ADA Assist Door & Frame: $7,500.00unit 1 Required $7,500.00(openers, electrical, patching, etc)
Provide Toilet Accessories: $1,000.00per restroom 5 Required 2 Required $7,000.00
Sum: $251,000.00 $200,700.00 $50,300.00
1912 Main Entry 1956 Gym Connector
Back to Assessment Summary
Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:24Facility Assessment Page 24
Facility Assessment
P. Site Condition
Description: Washington Elementary School is located in a small town setting on a medium sized parcel. Access is via the public road south of the site, as wellas a concrete drive north of the site. There is adequately defined separation of bus & other vehicular or pedestrian traffic, with buses using thepublic roads as a stacking lane. Additionally, information obtained from staff on site indicates that there are a large number of buses serving theschool and not adequate room for stacking during drop-off because of clogging of the public road. Parking is not adequate in number. Visitorparking is not defined as separate from staff parking. An adequate number of ADA spaces are provided but are not properly striped and signed,and are remote from the building entrance. The majority of the paving is in adequate to good condition. Sidewalk around the building entrances isin moderate shape, but stairs are often damaged, and some of the sidewalk is spalling or cracked. There is a brick pavement area that is heavilydamaged in the play area.
Rating: 3 Needs Replacement
Recommendations: Pavement should be overlaid with a light course. Sidewalk should be replaced to remove cracks and to reduce the risk of a trip hazard. Stairsshould be removed and replaced if cracked. Catch basins should be cleaned out and jetted. Playground equipment should be removed andreplaced, and the soft surface surrounding it replaced as well. The concrete drive to the north should be removed and replaced as well. ADAstalls need to be restriped and have a new sign installed to ensure compliance. The brick walk in the playground area should be removed andreplaced with concrete sidewalk.
Item Cost Unit Whole Building
Original Building (1912)38,557 ft²
Addition 1 (1956)8,460 ft²
Sum Comments
Playground Equipment: $1.50sq.ft. (Qty) 38,557 Required
8,460 Required
$70,525.50(up to $100,000, per sq.ft. of school)
Removal of existing Playground Equipment: $2,000.00lump sum Required $2,000.00
Replace Existing Asphalt Paving (light duty): $28.60sq. yard 58 Required 13 Required $2,030.60(including drainage / tear out for light dutyasphalt)
Asphalt Paving / New Wearing Course: $19.00sq. yard 1,659 Required 364 Required
$38,437.00(includes minor crack repair in less than 5% ofpaved area)
Existing Parking Spaces -$1,100.00per unit 18 Required 4 Required -$24,200.00(subtract $1,100 per existing parking space)
Additional Parking Spaces Required for Elementary
$165.00per student 410 Required 90 Required $82,500.00($1,500 per parking space; 0.11 space perelementary student. Parking space includesparking lot drive space.)
Concrete Sidewalk: $5.00sq.ft. (Qty) 1,796 Required 394 Required
$10,950.00(5 inch exterior slab)
Exterior Hand / Guard Rails: $43.00ln.ft. 226 Required 49 Required $11,825.00
Replace Concrete Steps: $32.00sq.ft. (Qty) 726 Required 159 Required
$28,320.00
Base Sitework Allowance for Unforeseen Circumstances
$50,000.00allowance Required $50,000.00Include this and one of the next two. (Appliesfor whole building, so only one addition shouldhave this item)
Sitework Allowance for UnforeseenCircumstances for buildings between 0 SFand 100,000 SF
$1.50sq.ft. (of entirebuilding addition)
Required Required $70,525.50Include this one or the next. (Each additionshould have this item)
Other: ADA Parking Signage/Striping $1,000.00each 2 Required $2,000.00Replace striping and ADA compliant sign
Other: Concrete Pavement $70.00sq. yard 359 Required 79 Required $30,660.008’’ reinforced concrete pavement
Other: Pavement Milling $21.00sq. yard 1,659 Required 364 Required
$42,483.00Pavement milling and removal
Sum: $418,056.60 $352,599.80 $65,456.80
Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:24Facility Assessment Page 25
East Side Playground Access East Side Parking and Access Drive
Back to Assessment Summary
Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:24Facility Assessment Page 26
Facility Assessment
Q. Sewage System
Description: The sanitary sewer drains to a municipal system with no reported problems and is in good condition. Note: Assessing Consultants often do notinclude any relevant photos, though there exist opportunities to do so, such as sanitary manholes, cleanouts, sanitary pump stations, lift stations,sanitary piping inside the building, Kitchen grease interceptors, etc.
Rating: 1 Satisfactory
Recommendations: No work required.
Item CostUnitWhole BuildingOriginal Building (1912)38,557 ft²
Addition 1 (1956)8,460 ft²
SumComments
Sum: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Sanitary
Back to Assessment Summary
Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:24Facility Assessment Page 27
Facility Assessment
R. Water Supply
Description: The 3’’ water supply with 2’’ meter comes from a municipal system, which provides adequate pressure and capacity for the needs of the school.
Rating: 1 Satisfactory
Recommendations: No work required.
Item CostUnitWhole BuildingOriginal Building (1912)38,557 ft²
Addition 1 (1956)8,460 ft²
SumComments
Sum: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Backflow preventer Water meter
Back to Assessment Summary
Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:24Facility Assessment Page 28
Facility Assessment
S. Exterior Doors
Description: Typical exterior doors in the overall facility are a combination of aluminum, wood and hollow metal type construction, installed on aluminumhollow metal frames, and in poor condition. Some exterior doors feature single glazed vision panels. Main entrance doors in the 1912 Addition arewood type construction, installed on wood frames, and in poor condition. Entrance doors feature single glazed vision panels. There are nooverhead doors in the facility.
Rating: 3 Needs Replacement
Recommendations: Replace all exterior doors to comply with Ohio Building Code, ADA, and Ohio School Design Manual guidelines.
Item Cost Unit Whole BuildingOriginal Building (1912)38,557 ft²
Addition 1 (1956)8,460 ft²
Sum Comments
Door Leaf/Frame and Hardware:$2,500.00per leaf 10 Required 9 Required $47,500.00(includes removal of existing)
Sum: $47,500.00 $25,000.00 $22,500.00
Main Entry Exit Doors from Lower Level
Back to Assessment Summary
Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:24Facility Assessment Page 29
Facility Assessment
T. Hazardous Material
Description: The School District provided the AHERA three year reinspection reports, prepared by ASTAR, and dated October 2017, documenting known andassumed locations of asbestos and other hazardous materials.
Rating: 3 Needs Replacement
Recommendations: Remove all hazardous materials, inclusive of asbestos-containing materials in the overall facility, as noted in the attached Environmental HazardsAssessment.
Item Cost Unit Whole BuildingOriginal Building (1912)38,557 ft²
Addition 1 (1956)8,460 ft²
Sum Comments
Environmental Hazards Form EHA Form —
Resilient Flooring Removal, Including Mastic$3.00sq.ft. (Qty) 5,000 Required $15,000.00See J
Sum: $15,000.00 $0.00 $15,000.00
VAT Tiles VAT Tiles
Back to Assessment Summary
Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:24Facility Assessment Page 30
Facility Assessment
U. Life Safety
Description: The 1912 building has no enclosed stairways. The overall facility does not contain a compliant automated fire suppression system; however alimited sprinkler system is provided for the boiler room. The kitchen hood is not equipped with a suppression system, but the kitchen is not usedfor food preparation (warming only). The facility is not equipped with an emergency generator.
Rating: 3 Needs Replacement
Recommendations: Enclose the two existing stairs in the 1912 building. Provide an automated fire suppression system to meet OSFC design manual guidelines.Provide a new emergency generator with funding provided via complete replacement of electrical system in Item D. Replace 6 levels of handrail.
Item Cost Unit Whole Building
Original Building (1912)38,557 ft²
Addition 1 (1956)8,460 ft²
Sum Comments
Sprinkler / Fire Suppression System: $3.20sq.ft. (Qty)
38,557 Required 8,460 Required $150,454.40(includes increase of service piping, ifrequired)
Interior Stairwell Closure: $5,000.00per level 6 Required $30,000.00(includes associated doors, door frames andhardware)
Water Main $50.00ln.ft. 100 Required $5,000.00(new)
Handrails: $5,000.00level 6 Required $30,000.00
Other: Backflow Preventer for new sprinklerservice line
$5,000.00each 1 Required $5,000.00Required for new service.
Sum: $220,454.40 $193,382.40 $27,072.00
Kitchen hood Limited area sprinkler double check valve
Back to Assessment Summary
Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:24Facility Assessment Page 31
Facility Assessment
V. Loose Furnishings
Description: The typical Classroom furniture is mismatched, and in generally poor condition, consisting of student desks & chairs / teacher desks & chairs /desk height file cabinets / reading tables / computer workstations / bookcases / wastebaskets / other. The facility’s furniture and loose equipmentwere evaluated in item 6.17 in the CEFPI section of this report, and on a scale of 1 to 10 the overall facility received a rating of 2 due to observedconditions, and due to the fact that it lacks some of the Design Manual required elements.
Rating: 3 Needs Replacement
Recommendations: Provide for replacement of outdated and inadequate furniture.
Item Cost Unit Whole BuildingOriginal Building (1912)38,557 ft²
Addition 1 (1956)8,460 ft²
Sum Comments
CEFPI Rating 0 to 3$6.50sq.ft. (of entire building addition) Required Required $305,610.50
Sum: $305,610.50 $250,620.50 $54,990.00
Media Center Area Typical Classroom
Back to Assessment Summary
Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:24Facility Assessment Page 32
Facility Assessment
W. Technology
Description: The building is not compliant with OSDM guidelines for Technology. There is one computer lab available to students.
Rating: 3 Needs Replacement
Recommendations: Provide funding for technology upgrades.
Item Cost Unit Whole BuildingOriginal Building (1912)38,557 ft²
Addition 1 (1956)8,460 ft²
Sum Comments
ES portion of building with total SF < 50,000$14.00sq.ft. (Qty) 38,557 Required 8,460 Required $658,238.00
Sum: $658,238.00 $539,798.00 $118,440.00
Network Rack at Office Projector; Typical Classroom
Back to Assessment Summary
Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:24Facility Assessment Page 33
Facility Assessment
X. Construction Contingency / Non-Construction Cost
Renovation Costs (A-W) $6,982,702.41
7.00% Construction Contingency $488,789.17
Subtotal $7,471,491.58
16.29% Non-Construction Costs $1,217,105.98
Total Project $8,688,597.56
Construction Contingency $488,789.17
Non-Construction Costs $1,217,105.98
Total for X. $1,705,895.15
Non-Construction Costs Breakdown
Land Survey 0.03% $2,241.45
Soil Borings / Phase I Envir. Report 0.10% $7,471.49
Agency Approval Fees (Bldg. Code) 0.25% $18,678.73
Construction Testing 0.40% $29,885.97
Printing - Bid Documents 0.15% $11,207.24
Advertising for Bids 0.02% $1,494.30
Builder’s Risk Insurance 0.12% $8,965.79
Design Professional’s Compensation 7.50% $560,361.87
CM Compensation 6.00% $448,289.49
Commissioning 0.60% $44,828.95
Non-Construction Contingency (includes partnering and mediation services) 1.12% $83,680.71
Total Non-Construction Costs 16.29% $1,217,105.98
Back to Assessment Summary
Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:24Facility Assessment Page 34
School Facility Appraisal
Name of Appraiser Laura Kretz Date of Appraisal 2017-11-06
Building Name Washington Elementary School
Street Address 401 Washington St.
City/Town, State, Zip Code Marietta, OH 45750
Telephone Number(s) 740-374-6520
School District Marietta City SD
Setting: Small City
Site-Acreage 0.73 Building Square Footage 47,017
Grades Housed K-5 Student Capacity 469
Number of Teaching Stations 26 Number of Floors 3
Student Enrollment 335
Dates of Construction 1912,1956
Energy Sources: Fuel Oil Gas Electric Solar
Air Conditioning: Roof Top Windows Units Central Room Units
Heating: Central Roof Top Individual Unit Forced Air
Hot Water Steam
Type of Construction
Load bearing masonry
Steel frame
Concrete frame
Wood
Steel Joists
Exterior Surfacing
Brick
Stucco
Metal
Wood
Stone
Floor Construction
Wood Joists
Steel Joists
Slab on grade
Structural slab
Back to Assessment Summary
Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:24School Facility Appraisal Page 35
Suitability Appraisal of 1.0 The School Site for Washington Elementary School
Bottom of page
Suitability Appraisal of 1.0 The School Site for Washington Elementary School
1.0 The School Site Points Allocated Points
1.1 Site is large enough to meet educational needs as defined by state and local requirements 25 3
The Ohio School Facilities Commission Ohio School Design Manual requires the site to be 13.35 acres. The site has 1.5 acres. The site is undersized.
1.2 Site is easily accessible and conveniently located for the present and future population 20 10
The site is accessible from collector, city, or arterial roads that are suitable for buses, cars, and service vehicles. Two or three entry points into the site are provided, with
inappropriate separation of car and bus traffic. Centrally located but access on and around the site is limited.
1.3 Location is removed from undesirable business, industry, traffic, and natural hazards 10 7
Residential.
1.4 Site is well landscaped and developed to meet educational needs 10 5
All areas of the site are seeded. The lawn areas where mowing is required do not exceed 3:1 slope. There are large species of deciduous trees and smaller, ornamental
canopy trees for shade of the building, parking lots, and playground areas. There are evergreen trees and shrubs that act as a wind screen for building and site. There is a
visual screen of service areas and adjacent properties. Low maintenance shrubs and flowering trees emphasize the building entrance. The west and south lawns have grass
and mature trees. They are also steeply sloped. There is no screening of service areas.
1.5 ES Well equipped playgrounds are separated from streets and parking areasMS Well equipped athletic and intermural areas are separated from streets and parkingHS Well equipped athletic areas are adequate with sufficient solid-surface parking
10 8
The play area does not comply with ADAG guidelines. Hard surface and soft surface play areas are provided. The hard surface area provides educational features painted
on the surface. The soft surface area is not firm, slip-resistant, and resilient. An accessible route of travel is not provided through the soft surface area. Kindergarten play
areas are not separated. Equipment is worn and aged.
1.6 Topography is varied enough to provide desirable appearance and without steep inclines 5 1
A level area is provided to accommodate buildings, perimeter walks, vehicular circulation, mechanical/service yard, parking areas, outdoor student playgrounds, and
physical education areas. There is a sufficient slope across the site to allow for positive drainage to a storm sewer outlet or other discharge point. There is no significant
changes in topography. West and south sides are slopped and inaccessible play area is raised from parking area.
1.7 Site has stable, well drained soil free of erosion 5 4
There are no signs of erosion or ponding on the site. Some ponding in play area.
1.8 Site is suitable for special instructional needs, e.g., outdoor learning 5 4
The site is suitable for special instructional needs with areas equipped with tables and seating suitable for outdoor learning. There are fixed benches and closed trash
receptacles among walks to the main building entrance. Play area provides tables and benches. Accessibility is an issue.
1.9 Pedestrian services include adequate sidewalk with designated crosswalks, curb cuts, and correct slopes 5 3
Walks are between 8-12 feet wide, around the perimeter of the building, which can serve as emergency vehicular access, and between the bus loading and unloading
area, connecting to the building entrance. Minor connecting walks are a minimum of 5 feet wide. All walks are sloped between 1% and 1:20. There is a walk connecting the
school to the public sidewalk. Curb ramps are provided at the bus and vehicular loading areas, and along the accessible route. While walks are provided circulation is not
accessible.
1.10 ES/MS Sufficient on-site, solid surface parking for faculty and staff is providedHS Sufficient on-site, solid surface parking is provided for faculty, students, staff and community
5 2
Inadequate staff parking and not designed well.
TOTAL - 1.0 The School Site 100 47
Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:24Suitability Appraisal of 1.0 The School Site for Washington Elementary School Page 36
Suitability Appraisal of 2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features for Washington Elementary School
Bottom of page
Suitability Appraisal of 2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features for Washington Elementary School
2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features Points Allocated Points
Structural
2.1 Structure meets all barrier-free requirements both externally and internally 15 3
At the site, there is an accessible route provided from the public right-of-way, the accessible parking areas, and from the passenger unloading zone, to the main
entrance of the school. An accessible route connects every area of the site. The entrance is in the accessible route, and is non-complaint. The building overall is not ADA
accessible. On the interior of the building, space allowances and reach ranges are non-compliant. There is no accessible route that does not have protruding objects. Ground
and floor surfaces are mostly compliant. Ramps and stairs do not meet ADA requirements. The elevator does not comply with all requirements. There is a platform lift that is
compliant. The facility does not contain an elevator. Interior doors and hardware are non-compliant. Drinking fountains, water closets, urinals, showers, toilet partitions,
mirrors, and lavatories are provided, and are mostly non-compliant. Restrooms have an appropriate amount of clearance. Handrails and grab bars that are ADA compliant are
provided. ADA compliant alarms and strobes are provided. Signage is not ADA compliant. Fixed and built-in seating is compliant for the ages of the students. The assembly
area is accessible and compliant.
2.2 Roofs appear sound, have positive drainage, and are weather tight 15 7
The roof over the facility is a built up roof and spray foam overlay roof. The roof is in poor condition. Gutters, downspouts and roof drains are in good condition.
2.3 Foundations are strong and stable with no observable cracks 10 9
The foundation appears to be in good condition.
2.4 Exterior and interior walls have sufficient expansion joints and are free of deterioration 10 6
There are no signs of deterioration in the masonry walls. Exterior and interior walls have sufficient expansion joints. Exterior walls of the 1956 addition need some
repair.
2.5 Entrances and exits are located so as to permit efficient student traffic flow 10 6
Entries have steps and exterior egress from lower level is up steps.
2.6 Building ’’envelope’’ generally provides for energy conservation (see criteria) 10 3
The windows have insulated glazing. The roof is insulated. Windows are not insulated.
2.7 Structure is free of friable asbestos and toxic materials 10 6
See asbestos report. A lot of non-friable VAT remains.
2.8 Interior walls permit sufficient flexibility for a variety of class sizes 10 2
The interior walls are fixed masonry or partition walls and do not permit flexibility for a variety of class sizes.
Mechanical/Electrical Points Allocated Points
2.9 Adequate light sources are well maintained, and properly placed and are not subject to overheating 15 8
The lighting system does not provide the minimum lighting intensity in all areas of the building, as required by the OSDM. Many classrooms do not have dual-level
lighting systems.
2.10 Internal water supply is adequate with sufficient pressure to meet health and safety requirements 15 12
The supply piping is 50% galvanized and 50% copper. Insufficient pressure may be due to rusted supply piping. Supply is from city system and quantity and pressure
is good. Some piping is old.
2.11 Each teaching/learning area has adequate convenient wall outlets, phone and computer cabling for technology applications
15 3
Classrooms typically have 4 wall outlets. Each Classroom has at least 1 phone jack, 1 network jack and 1 cable jack.
2.12 Electrical controls are safely protected with disconnect switches easily accessible 10 5
Electrical system is old.
2.13 Drinking fountains are adequate in number and placement, and are properly maintained including provisions for the disabled
10 7
Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:24Suitability Appraisal of 2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features for Washington Elementary School Page 37
There is a sufficient quantity of drinking fountains. They are spread out, throughout the building. There is not an adequate number of ADA compliant fountains.
2.14 Number and size of restrooms meet requirements 10 7
There are not enough Restrooms, as required by the OBC and the ADAG, but none are accessible.
2.15 Drainage systems are properly maintained and meet requirements 10 5
The gutters and downspouts are in poor condition, and are properly located. The roof drains are adequate in number and placement, but no overflow drains provided.
There are floor drains in the Restrooms and the Mechanical Rooms. There are yard drains in low areas of the site. The parking lot has an adequate amount of drains.
2.16 Fire alarms, smoke detectors, and sprinkler systems are properly maintained and meet requirements 10 2
Horn and strobe fire alarms are provided in all locations, as required by the OBC and the ADAG. The building is equipped with smoke detectors. The building is not
sprinkled or fully sprinkled or has a limited area sprinkler system. Fire alarm devices are properly placed. The building does not have a sprinkler system except for limited area
in the mechanical room.
2.17 Intercommunication system consists of a central unit that allows dependable two-way communication between theoffice and instructional areas
10 4
There is a two-way intercom system in each Classroom with a central unit in the Administration Area. Intercom system is a central unit with 2-way comm between office
and classrooms, with comm only from the office.
2.18 Exterior water supply is sufficient and available for normal usage 5 4
Exterior secure hose bibbs are present around the building.
TOTAL - 2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features 200 99
Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:24Suitability Appraisal of 2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features for Washington Elementary School Page 38
Suitability Appraisal of 3.0 Plant Maintainability for Washington Elementary School
Bottom of page
Suitability Appraisal of 3.0 Plant Maintainability for Washington Elementary School
3.0 Plant Maintainability Points Allocated Points
3.1 Windows, doors, and walls are of material and finish requiring minimum maintenance 15 4
Windows, doors, and walls are of material and finish requiring average maintenance. Windows are not double pane insulated glazing in aluminum frames. Exterior doors
and frames are aluminum, hollow metal and wood. Interior doors are wood on steel or wood frames. Doors are not louvered. Exterior walls are brick/ Some interior walls are
painted or glazed masonry. Most interior walls are painted plaster or masonry.
3.2 Floor surfaces throughout the building require minimum care 15 5
Floor surfaces throughout the building require average care. Asbestos containing floor tiles require special maintenance to control airborne fibres that may be released
during scrubbing and waxing operations. Floors in the Classrooms are wood, carpet, and VCT. Floors in the Corridors are wood and concrete. Floors in the Restrooms are
ceramic tile. Floors in the Student Dining Area are VAT. Floors in the Kitchen are VAT. Floors in the Gymnasium(s) are VAT. Floors in the Stairwells are concrete.
3.3 Ceilings and walls throughout the building, including service areas, are easily cleaned and resistant to stain 10 7
Ceilings are ACT, and plaster. Ceilings are fairly easy to clean and stain resistant.
3.4 Built-in equipment is designed and constructed for ease of maintenance 10 2
There is very little built-in equipment.
3.5 Finishes and hardware, with compatible keying system, are of durable quality 10 4
Door hardware has a compatible keying system. Exterior door hardware is not ADAG compliant. Interior door hardware is at the classrooms is mostly ADAG compliant.
3.6 Restroom fixtures are wall mounted and of quality finish 10 6
Fixtures in 1912 addition were replaced in early 1990s and need to be replaced.
3.7 Adequate custodial storage space with water and drain is accessible throughout the building 10 4
Custodial Spaces are minimally available in all areas of the building with water and drain.
3.8 Adequate electrical outlets and power, to permit routine cleaning, are available in every area 10 3
Corridors do not have an adequate number of outlets. Classrooms do not have an adequate number of outlets.
3.9 Outdoor light fixtures, electrical outlets, equipment, and other fixtures are accessible for repair and replacement 10 6
Light fixtures and no outlets are on all sides of the building and at every door and are accessible by ladder and are in very poor condition.
TOTAL - 3.0 Plant Maintainability 100 41
Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:24Suitability Appraisal of 3.0 Plant Maintainability for Washington Elementary School Page 39
Suitability Appraisal of 4.0 Building Safety and Security for Washington Elementary School
Bottom of page
Suitability Appraisal of 4.0 Building Safety and Security for Washington Elementary School
4.0 Building Safety and Security Points Allocated Points
Site Safety
4.1 Student loading areas are segregated from other vehicular traffic and pedestrian walkways 15 1
Student loading areas are not segregated from pedestrian walkways. Vehicular traffic does not occur in the bus loading area. The student loading is at the street.
4.2 Walkways, both on and offsite, are available for safety of pedestrians 10 7
There are sidewalks provided in the public right of way, along the main road. Access is provided from the public sidewalk to the building entrance, but they are not
accessible routes. See also 1.9.
4.3 Access streets have sufficient signals and signs to permit safe entrance to and exit from school area 5 3
There are both signage and signals provided, but signage is limited and there is a lot of on street parking.
4.4 Vehicular entrances and exits permit safe traffic flow 5 3
Staff parking is between the school and play area. See 1.2.
4.5 ES Playground equipment is free from hazardMS Location and types of intramural equipment are free from hazardHS Athletic field equipment is properly located and is free from hazard
5 3
The playground equipment is made up mostly of plastic coated steel or high density plastic. Equipment is aging. Used as park for resident.
Building Safety Points Allocated Points
4.6 The heating unit(s) is located away from student occupied areas 20 7
The boiler room is adjacent to the library, steam radiators are in rooms.
4.7 Multi-story buildings have at least two stairways for student egress 15 10
Stairways are not enclosed and are not ADA and OBC compliant.
4.8 Exterior doors open outward and are equipped with panic hardware 10 6
Exterior doors open outward, and are equipped with mostly very old functional panic hardware that is not ADA compliant.
4.9 Emergency lighting is provided throughout the entire building with exit signs on separate electrical circuits 10 8
Emergency lighting is provided. Lights are battery powered. There are an appropriate amount of exit signs.
4.10 Classroom doors are recessed and open outward 10 6
Classroom doors are not recessed with appropriate door clearances, as required by the ADAG. The doors protrude into the Corridor by more than 8 inches.
4.11 Building security systems are provided to assure uninterrupted operation of the educational program 10 2
The building security system includes door contacts and motion sensors, which are located at the doors and in Corridors. There is not a visitor control system provided.
Exterior doors have intercom and key cards.A few cameras and monitor system.
4.12 Flooring (including ramps and stairways) is maintained in a non-slip condition 5
Classroom flooring is maintained in a non-slip condition, but corridors are wood. See 3.2 for a list of floor finishes. Stairways do not have rubber treads.
4.13 Stair risers (interior and exterior) do not exceed 6 1/2 inches and range in number from 3 - 16 5 5
Stair risers do not exceed the 7 inches permitted by the OBC.
4.14 Glass is properly located and protected with wire or safety material to prevent accidental student injury 5 1
Glass in the exterior door systems is not tempered. Glass in the interior doors systems is not all tempered. Wire glass is very old and doesn’t conform to current code.
4.15 Fixed Projections in the traffic areas do not extend more than eight inches from the corridor wall 5 4
Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:24Suitability Appraisal of 4.0 Building Safety and Security for Washington Elementary School Page 40
Fixed projections in the Corridor do not exceed 8 inches. Fixed projections in the accessible route do not exceed 4 inches. Corridors are oversized in width.
4.16 Traffic areas terminate at an exit or a stairway leading to an egress 5 5
There are no dead-end Corridors in the building. All Corridors terminate at exits or stairways leading to exits. Stairways empty to the exterior, or adjacent to a Corridor
leading to the exterior. Stairways are not enclosed.
Emergency Safety Points Allocated Points
4.17 Adequate fire safety equipment is properly located 15 12
The travel distance from any location to a 20# type ABC fire extinguisher is 50 feet or less, in the Corridors.
4.18 There are at least two independent exits from any point in the building 15 14
There are no dead-end Corridors in the building. There are 5 exits to the outside, provided from the Corridors. Classrooms have door or window egress, as
recommended in the Life Safety Code.
4.19 Fire-resistant materials are used throughout the structure 15 11
The structure is a masonry load bearing system with steel joist and concrete deck. Interior walls are masonry. Finishes comply with OBC requirements. 1912 Addition
has wood floors, doors and casework.
4.20 Automatic and manual emergency alarm system with a distinctive sound and flashing light is provided 15 12
There is an automatic and manual emergency alarm system is provided. The system has an audible alarm and strobes, but is an older system.
TOTAL - 4.0 Building Safety and Security 200 120
Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:24Suitability Appraisal of 4.0 Building Safety and Security for Washington Elementary School Page 41
Suitability Appraisal of 5.0 Educational Adequacy for Washington Elementary School
Bottom of page
Suitability Appraisal of 5.0 Educational Adequacy for Washington Elementary School
5.0 Educational Adequacy Points Allocated Points
Academic Learning Space
5.1 Size of academic learning areas meets desirable standards 25 20
The typical Classroom is 745 SF. The OSDM recommends 900 SF.
5.2 Classroom space permits arrangements for small group activity 15 12
Small group activities are available in the classrooms.
5.3 Location of academic learning areas is near related educational activities and away from disruptive noise 10 7
Academic areas are arranged so that children of the same age are groped together. The Media Center is not centrally located to the Academic Areas. The Physical
Education and Student Dining Areas are away from the academic core.
5.4 Personal space in the classroom away from group instruction allows privacy time for individual students 10 2
There is little space for individual instruction.
5.5 Storage for student materials is adequate 10 3
There are not lockers in the Corridors, adjacent to the Academic Areas. Areas for student storage in the Classrooms is in old cloakrooms. Storage for student materials
is not adequate.
5.6 Storage for teacher materials is adequate 10 3
There are limited horizontal files, vertical files and bookshelves for the teachers. The Storage Room is is a very thin closet SF. Storage for teacher materials is not
adequate.
Special Learning Space Points Allocated Points
5.7 Size of special learning area(s) meets standards 15 5
The Special Learning Area is around 300 SF. The OSDM recommends 900 SF.
5.8 Design of specialized learning area(s) is compatible with instructional need 10 3
There is not a Self-Contained Classroom provided. Support spaces do not include a Conference/Workroom, Special Education Resource Center, and a
Restroom/Shower.
5.9 Library/Resource/Media Center provides appropriate and attractive space 10 5
The Media Center is 2,129 SF. The Media Center is not centrally located and not in a separate space.
5.10 Gymnasium (or covered P.E. area) adequately serves physical education instruction 5 5
The Gymnasium is 4,953 SF. The OSDM recommends a minimum of 3,500 to 5,000 SF.
5.11 ES Pre-kindergarten and kindergarten space is appropriate for age of students and nature of instructionMS/HS Science program is provided sufficient space and equipment
10 6
The Kindergarten Classrooms are 745 SF. The OSDM recommends 1,200 SF. The Kindergarten Classroom provides an appropriate space for age of students and
nature of instruction.
5.12 Music Program is provided adequate sound treated space 5 4
There are acoustical panels on the walls of the Band Room and Choir Room. Ceilings are plaster.
5.13 Space for art is appropriate for special instruction, supplies, and equipment 5 3
The Art Room is 745 SF. The OSDM recommends 1,200 SF. Space for the Art Program is appropriate for special instruction, is well stocked with supplies, and is well
equipped.
School Facility Appraisal Points Allocated Points
Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:24Suitability Appraisal of 5.0 Educational Adequacy for Washington Elementary School Page 42
5.14 Space for technology education permits use of state-of-the-art equipment 5 4
The Computer Lab is 745 SF. The OSDM recommends 1,000 SF. Space for the Technology Education Program permits use of state-of-the-art equipment.
5.15 Space for small groups and remedial instruction is provided adjacent to classrooms 5 1
There is little space for small group or remedial instruction provided. Teachers and volunteers use the Corridor outside of the Classrooms for remedial instruction
space.
5.16 Storage for student and teacher material is adequate 5 1
Storage for student and teacher material is not adequate.
Support Space Points Allocated Points
5.17 Teacher’s lounge and work areas reflect teachers as professionals 10 4
The Teacher’s Lounge is 350 SF. The OSDM recommends a minimum of 450-900 SF for 8-24 staff. The lounge is undersized and poorly furnished.
5.18 Cafeteria/Kitchen is attractive with sufficient space for seating/dining, delivery, storage, and food preparation 10 6
The Student Dining/Kitchen Areas are 4,953 SF and 986 SF respectively. The OSDM recommends a minimum of 1/3 of the building capacity X 15 SF or 3,000 SF. The
areas are not attractive spaces with sufficient room for seating, dining, delivery, storage, and food preparation, as a warming kitchen.
5.19 Administrative offices provided are consistent in appearance and function with the maturity of the students served 5 3
The Offices are undersized and poorly laid out.
5.20 Counselor’s office insures privacy and sufficient storage 5 1
There is no Counselor’s office.
5.21 Clinic is near administrative offices and is equipped to meet requirements 5 3
The Clinic is 173 SF. The OSDM recommends a minimum of 300 SF. It is located near the Reception Area. The Clinic is not equipped to meet requirements.
5.22 Suitable reception space is available for students, teachers, and visitors 5 3
The Reception Area is about 150 SF and is available for students, teachers, and visitors. The OSDM recommends a minimum of 200-400 SF.
5.23 Administrative personnel are provided sufficient work space and privacy 5 2
There is about 700 SF provided for the principal, assistant principal, secretary, Conference Room, Storage, Copy Room, in school suspension, parent/volunteer office,
itinerate, career center and Restroom. The OSDM recommends around 2,600 SF. The area provides administrative personnel insufficient work space and privacy.
TOTAL - 5.0 Educational Adequacy 200 106
Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:24Suitability Appraisal of 5.0 Educational Adequacy for Washington Elementary School Page 43
Suitability Appraisal of 6.0 Environment for Education for Washington Elementary School
Bottom of page
Suitability Appraisal of 6.0 Environment for Education for Washington Elementary School
6.0 Environment for Education Points Allocated Points
Exterior Environment
6.1 Overall design is aesthetically pleasing to age of students 15 12
The building is a traditional design, with classical detailing. The building is one color and texture of brick.
6.2 Site and building are well landscaped 10 8
See 1.4.
6.3 Exterior noise and poor environment do not disrupt learning 10 8
Exterior noise and a poor environment do not disrupt learning. Exterior noise is limited to traffic noise. See item 1.3 for a listing of surrounding site usage.
6.4 Entrances and walkways are sheltered from sun and inclement weather 10 4
The main building entrance is minimally sheltered. Exits are minimally sheltered.
6.5 Building materials provide attractive color and texture 5 3
The exterior surface of the building is one color and texture of brick. Building materials do not provide attractive color and texture to the age of students being served.
Requires cleaning.
Interior Environment Points Allocated Points
6.6 Color schemes, building materials, and decor provide an impetus to learning 20 12
The color palette is comprised mostly of neutral colors, accent colors of more saturated hues in classrooms. Carpeting is monochromatic and worn. Grout color for floor
tile is a tinted shade. Back walls and side walls of a stage are not painted black or dark grey because the space is multiuse. Stage floors are a dark VAT. Plastic laminate on
countertops and work surfaces are sparse. The use of repeated colors in public spaces and materials give the building some unity and a sense of consistency.
6.7 Year around comfortable temperature and humidity are provided throughout the building 15 6
The building does not contain an air conditioning system other than an occasional window unit or limited units for certain spaces.
6.8 Ventilating system provides adequate quiet circulation of clean air and meets 15cfm VBC requirement 15 13
It does not provide the minimum 15 cfm ventilation as required by the OBCMC.
6.9 Lighting system provides proper intensity, diffusion, and distribution of illumination 15 3
See 2.9.
6.10 Drinking fountains and restroom facilities are conveniently located 15 8
Drinking fountains and Restrooms are located on each floor. Each Kindergarten Classroom does not have a Toilet Room.
6.11 Communication among students is enhanced by commons area(s) for socialization 10 7
There are areas for students to gather in the Student Dining Area, and Gymnasium. There is a gathering area at the Corridor and Playground.
6.12 Traffic flow is aided by appropriate foyers and corridors 10 7
The Foyers and Corridors do not provide an ADA accessible route.
6.13 Areas for students to interact are suitable to the age group 10 7
Areas for students to interact are suitable to the age group.
6.14 Large group areas are designed for effective management of students 10 6
There is a PA system provided, with jacks at each end of the gathering area in gym.
6.15 Acoustical treatment of ceilings, walls, and floors provides effective sound control 10 7
Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:24Suitability Appraisal of 6.0 Environment for Education for Washington Elementary School Page 44
Classroom floors are carpeted and have VCT and ACT flooring. Ceilings are ACT or plaster. The acoustical treatment in the Classroom is adequate. The acoustical
treatment in the Student Dining Area is adequate. The acoustical treatment in the Media Center is inadequate. The acoustical treatment in the Corridors is adequate. The
acoustical treatment in the Music Room is adequate. The acoustical treatment in the Gymnasium is adequate.
6.16 Window design contributes to a pleasant environment 10 6
Windows are large but not insulated.
6.17 Furniture and equipment provide a pleasing atmosphere 10 2
The tables, desks, and chairs provided for the students, as recommended by the OSDM are old and mismatched. There are desks, vertical files, lateral files, and
bookshelves provided for teachers that do not meet OSDM requirements. There are not high density stall chairs and folding cafeteria tables provided that meet OSDM
requirements. Tables are built-in in gym.
TOTAL - 6.0 Environment for Education 200 119
Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:24Suitability Appraisal of 6.0 Environment for Education for Washington Elementary School Page 45
LEED Observation NotesSchool District: Marietta City SD
County: Washington
School District IRN: 44321
Building: Washington Elementary School
Building IRN: 39578
Sustainable Sites
Construction process can have a harmful effect on local ecology, especially when buildings are build on productive agricultural, wildlife or open areas. Several measures can be
take however to prevent the impact on undeveloped lands or to improve previously contaminated sites. Appropriate location reduces the need for private transportation and helps
to prevent an increase in air pollution. Developing buildings in urban areas and on brownfield sites instead of greenfield locations has economical and environmental benefits.
Controlling stormwater runoff and erosion can prevent the worsening of water quality in receiving bodies of water and the impact on aquatic life. Once the building is constructed,
it’s important to decrease heat island effects and reduce the light pollution on the site.
(source: LEED Reference Guide, 2001:9)
Water Efficiency
In the US ca. 340 billion gallons of fresh water are withdrawn daily from surface sources, 65% of which is discharged later after use. Water is also withdrawn from underground
aquifers The excessive usage of water results in the current water deficit, estimated at 3,700 billion gallons. Water efficiency measures in commercial buildings can reduce water
usage by at least 30%. Low-flow fixtures, sensors or using non potable water for landscape irrigation, toilet flushing and building systems are just some of available strategies. Not
only do they result in environmental savings, but also bring about financial benefits, related to lower water use fees, lower sewage volumes to treat and energy use reductions.
(source: LEED Reference Guide, 2001:65)
Energy & Atmosphere
Buildings in the US account for more than 30% of the total energy use and for approximately 60% of electricity. 75% of energy is derived from the burning of fossil fuels, which
releases CO2 into the Atmosphere and contributes to global warming. Moreover, coal fired electric utilities release nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide, where the former contribute
to smog and the latter to acid rain. Other types of energy production are not less harmful. Burning of natural gas produces nitrogen oxides and greenhouse gases as well, nuclear
power creates nuclear wastes, while hydroelectric generating plants disrupt natural water flows. Luckily there are several practices that can reduce energy consumption and are
environmentally and economically beneficial. Not only will they reduce the air pollution and mitigate global warming thanks to being less dependent on power plants, but also they
will reduce operational costs and will quickly pay back. In order to make the most of those practices, it’s important to adopt a holistic approach to the building’s energy load and
integrate different energy saving strategies.
(source: LEED Reference Guide, 2001:93)
Material & Resources
The steps related to process building materials, such as extraction, processing and transportation are not environmentally natural, as they pollute the air, water and use natural
resources. Construction and demolition wastes account for 40% of the solid waste stream in the US. Reusing existing documents is one of the best strategies to reduce solid
wastes volumes and prevents then from ending up at landfills. It also reduces habitat disturbance and minimizes the need for the surrounding infrastructure. While using new
materials one should take into account different material sources. Salvaged materials provide savings on material costs, recycled content material minimizes waste products and
local materials reduce the environmental impact of transportation. Finally, using rapidly renewable materials and certified wood decreases the consumption of natural resources.
Recycling and reusing construction waste is another strategy to be taken into consideration in sustainable design.
(source: LEED Reference Guide, 2001:167)
Indoor Environmental Quality
As we spend a big majority of our time indoors, the emphasis should be put on optimal indoor environmental quality strategies while (re)designing a building . Otherwise, a poor
IEQ will have adverse effects on occupants’ health, productivity and quality of life. IEQ strategies such as ventilation effectiveness and control of contaminants or a building
flush-out prior to occupancy can reduce potential liability, increase the market value of the building but can also result in a significantly higher productivity (16%). Other strategies
involve automatic sensors and controls, introducing fresh air to the building or providing lots of daylighting views.
(source: LEED Reference Guide, 2001:215)
Innovation & Design Process
This category is aimed at recognizing projects that implemented innovative building features and sustainable building knowledge, and whose strategy or measure results
exceeded those which are required by the LEED Rating System. Expertise in sustainable design is the key element of the innovative design and construction process.
(source: LEED Reference Guide, 2001:271)
Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:24<Untitled> Page 46
Justification for Allocation of Points
Building Name and Level: Washington Elementary School
K-5
Building features that clearly exceed criteria:
1. Centrally located in historical district.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Building features that are non-existent or very inadequate:
1. Not accessible.
2. No sprinkler system.
3. No insulated windows.
4. Parking is low and site is small.
5.
6.
Back to Assessment Summary
Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:24Justification for Allocation of Points Page 47
Environmental Hazards Assessment Cost EstimatesOwner: Marietta City SD
Facility: Washington Elementary School
Date of Initial Assessment: Nov 6, 2017
Date of Assessment Update: Dec 19, 2017
Cost Set: 2019
District IRN: 44321
Building IRN: 39578
Firm: Schorr Architects, Inc.
Scope remains unchanged after cost updates.
Building Addition Addition Area (sf)Total of Environmental Hazards Assessment Cost Estimates
Renovation Demolition
1912 Original Building 38,557 $0.00 $0.00
1956 Addition 1 8,460 $15,000.00 $15,000.00
Total 47,017 $15,000.00 $15,000.00
Total with Regional Cost Factor (101.86%) — $15,279.00 $15,279.00
Regional Total with Soft Costs & Contingency — $19,011.71 $19,011.71
Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:24<Untitled> Page 48
Environmental Hazards - Marietta City SD (44321) - Washington Elementary School (39578) - Addition 1
Environmental Hazards - Marietta City SD (44321) - Washington Elementary School (39578) - Addition 1
Owner: Marietta City SD Bldg. IRN: 39578
Facility: Washington Elementary School BuildingAdd: Addition 1
Date On-Site: Consultant Name:
A. Asbestos Containing Material (ACM) AFM=Asbestos Free Material ACM Found Status Quantity Unit Cost Estimated Cost
1. Boiler/Furnace Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $10.00 $0.00 2. Breeching Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $10.00 $0.00 3. Tank Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $8.00 $0.00 4. Duct Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $8.00 $0.00 5. Pipe Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $10.00 $0.00 6. Pipe Fitting Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $20.00 $0.00 7. Pipe Insulation Removal (Crawlspace/Tunnel) Not Present 0 $12.00 $0.00 8. Pipe Fitting Insulation Removal (Crawlspace/Tunnel) Not Present 0 $30.00 $0.00 9. Pipe Insulation Removal (Hidden in Walls/Ceilings) Not Present 0 $15.00 $0.00 10. Dismantling of Boiler/Furnace/Incinerator Not Present 0 $2,000.00 $0.00 11. Flexible Duct Connection Removal Not Present 0 $100.00 $0.00 12. Acoustical Plaster Removal Not Present 0 $7.00 $0.00 13. Fireproofing Removal Not Present 0 $25.00 $0.00 14. Hard Plaster Removal Not Present 0 $7.00 $0.00 15. Gypsum Board Removal Not Present 0 $6.00 $0.00 16. Acoustical Panel/Tile Ceiling Removal Not Present 0 $3.00 $0.00 17. Laboratory Table/Counter Top Removal Not Present 0 $100.00 $0.00 18. Cement Board Removal Not Present 0 $5.00 $0.00 19. Electric Cord Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $1.00 $0.00 20. Light (Reflector) Fixture Removal Not Present 0 $50.00 $0.00 21. Sheet Flooring with Friable Backer Removal Not Present 0 $4.00 $0.00 22. Fire Door Removal Not Present 0 $100.00 $0.00 23. Door and Window Panel Removal Not Present 0 $100.00 $0.00 24. Decontamination of Crawlspace/Chase/Tunnel Not Present 0 $3.00 $0.00 25. Soil Removal Not Present 0 $150.00 $0.00 26. Non-ACM Ceiling/Wall Removal (for access) Not Present 0 $2.00 $0.00 27. Window Component (Compound, Tape, or Caulk) - Reno & Demo Not Present 0 $300.00 $0.00 28. Window Component (Compound, Tape, or Caulk) - Reno Only Not Present 0 $300.00 $0.00 29. Resilient Flooring Removal, Including Mastic Assumed Asbestos-Containing Material 5000 $3.00 $15,000.00 30. Carpet Mastic Removal Not Present 0 $2.00 $0.00 31. Carpet Removal (over RFC) Not Present 0 $1.00 $0.00 32. Acoustical Tile Mastic Removal Not Present 0 $3.00 $0.00 33. Sink Undercoating Removal Not Present 0 $100.00 $0.00 34. Roofing Removal Not Present 0 $2.00 $0.00 35. (Sum of Lines 1-34) Total Asb. Hazard Abatement Cost for Renovation Work $15,000.0036. (Sum of Lines 1-34) Total Asb. Hazard Abatement Cost for Demolition Work $15,000.00
B. Removal Of Underground Storage Tanks None Reported
Tank No. Location Age Product Stored Size Est.Rem.Cost1. (Sum of Lines 1-0) Total Cost For Removal Of Underground Storage Tanks $0.00
C. Lead-Based Paint (LBP) - Renovation Only Addition Constructed after 19801. Estimated Cost For Abatement Contractor to Perform Lead Mock-Ups $0.00 2. Special Engineering Fees for LBP Mock-Ups $0.00 3. (Sum of Lines 1-2) Total Cost for Lead-Based Paint Mock-Ups $0.00
D. Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts Recycling/Incineration Not Applicable Area Of Building Addition Square Feet w/Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts Unit Cost Total Cost
1. 8460 0 $0.10 $0.00
E. Other Environmental Hazards/Remarks None ReportedDescription Cost Estimate
1. (Sum of Lines 1-0) Total Cost for Other Environmental Hazards - Renovation $0.002. (Sum of Lines 1-0) Total Cost for Other Environmental Hazards - Demolition $0.00
F. Environmental Hazards Assessment Cost Estimate Summaries1. A35, B1, C3, D1, and E1 Total Cost for Env. Hazards Work - Renovation $15,000.002. A36, B1, D1, and E2 Total Cost for Env. Hazards Work - Demolition $15,000.00
* INSPECTION ASSUMPTIONS for Reported/Assumed Asbestos-Free Materials (Rep/Asm AFM):
a. Unless reported otherwise by the District, materials installed after 1980 are assumed to be asbestos-free.
b. Unless reported otherwise by the District, small quantities (less than 1,000 square feet) of the following materials are assumed to be asbestos free: hard plaster,acoustical plaster and gypsum board systems; acoustical panels and tiles; fireproofing; 12"×12" floor tile and mastic.
c. Unless reported otherwise by the District, all roofing materials are assumed to be asbestos-free.
THESE MATERIALS SHOULD BE PROPERLY SAMPLED AND ANALYZED FOR ASBESTOS PRIOR TO DISTURBING THEM.
Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:24<Untitled> Page 49