Download - Array Methods for Image Formation
![Page 1: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
Array Methods for Image Formation
Outline1. Fine scale heterogeneity in the mantle2. CCP stacking versus scattered wave imaging3. Scattered wave imaging systems4. Born Scattering = Single scattering5. Diffraction & Kirchhoff Depth Migration6. Limitations 7. Examples8. Tutorial: I use Matlab R2007b
![Page 2: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
SummaryData redundancy suppresses noise.Noise is whatever doesn’t fit the scattering
model.The image is only as good as the 1. The velocity model 2. The completeness of the dataset3. The assumptions the imaging system is
based on.1. We use a single-scattering assumption
![Page 3: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
SNORCLE
Subduction forming the Proterozoic continental mantle lithosphere:
Lateral advection of mass
Cook et al., (1999)Bostock (1998)
![Page 4: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
![Page 5: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
![Page 6: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Geometry: Fine scales in the mantle
Allegre and Turcotte, 1986Kellogg and Turcotte, 1994
![Page 7: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
![Page 8: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Coherent Subduction SUMA: Statistical UpperMantle AssemblageReservoirs are distributed
![Page 9: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Structures from basalt extraction
Oman ophiolite
![Page 10: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Regional Seismology: PNE DataHighly heterogeneous models of the CL
Nielsen et al, 2003, GJI
![Page 11: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Two classes of scattered wave imaging systems1. Incoherent imaging systems which are frequency and amplitude
sensitive. Examples are1. Photography2. Military Sonar3. Some deep crustal reflection seismology
2. Coherent imaging systems use phase coherence and are therefore sensitive to frequency, amplitude, and phase. Examples are 1. Medical ultrasound imaging2. Military sonar 3. Exploration seismology4. Receiver function imaging5. Scattered wave imaging in teleseismic studies
3. Mixed systems1. Sumatra earthquake source by Ishii et al. 2005
See Blackledge, 1989, Quantitative Coherent Imaging: Theory and Applications
![Page 12: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Direct imaging with seismic waves
Images based on this model of 1 D scattering are referred to as common conversion point stacks or
CCP images
Converted Wave Imaging from a continuous, specular, interface
From Niu and James, 2002, EPSL
![Page 13: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13CCP Stacking blurs the subsurface
The lateral focus is weak
![Page 14: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Fresnel Zones and other measures of wave sampling
• Fresnel zones• Banana donuts • WavepathsAre all about the same thingThey are means to estimate
the sampling volume for waves of finite-frequency, i.e. not a ray, but a wave.
Flatté et al., Sound Transmission Through a Fluctuating Ocean
![Page 15: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Moho
![Page 16: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Moho 410
![Page 17: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Moho
1p2s
2p1s 1p2s
Moho
T0=3s
1. Lateral heterogeneity is blurred
2. Mispositioning in depth from average V(z) profile
3. Pulses broaden due to increase in V with z
4. Crustal multiples obscure upper mantle
5. Diffractions stacked out
VE=1:1
![Page 18: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
Scattered wave imaging
Based on diffraction theory: Every point in the subsurface causes scattering
![Page 19: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
Scattered wave imaging improves lateral resolutionIt also restores dips€
R = zλ + λ2
4 ⎛ ⎝ ⎜ ⎞
⎠ ⎟
![Page 20: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
USArray: Bigfoot
x = 70 km, 7s < T < 30s
![Page 21: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21S. Ham, unpublished
SlabMultiples
SlabMultiples
Mismatch
![Page 22: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
Resolution Considerations
• Earthquakes are the only inexpensive energy source able to investigate the mantle
• Coherent Scattered Wave Imaging provides about an order of magnitude better resolution than travel time tomography. For wavelength
• Rscat~/2 versus Rtomo ~ (L)1/2
• For a normalized wavelength and path of 100• Rscat~ 0.5 versus Rtomo~ 10• The tomography model provides a smooth
background for scattered wave imaging
![Page 23: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
• The receiver function:
– Approximately isolates the SV wave from the P wave
– Reduces a vector system to a scalar system– Allows use of a scalar imaging equation with
P and S calculated separately for single scattering: From Barbara’s lecture:
€
ru P =∇φr u SV =∇ ×
r Ψ :
r Ψ = 0,ψ ,0( )
![Page 24: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
Three elements of an imaging algorithm
1. A scattering model 2. Wave (de)propagator
• Diffraction integrals (Wilson et al., 2005)• Kirchhoff Integrals (Bostock, 2002; Levander et al.,
2005)• One-way and two-way finite-difference operators
(Stanford SEP)• Generalized Radon Transforms (Bostock et al., 2001)• Fourier transforms in space and/or time with phase
shifting (Stolt, 1977, Geophysics)3. A focusing criteria known as an imaging condition
![Page 25: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
LG(x,t; xs )=δ(t)δ(x−xs)LG(x,ω ) =1
G=L−1
Lu=s(ω)
u=L−1s(ω)u=Gs(ω)
Depropagator: assume smooth coefficientsi.e., c(x,y,z) varies smoothly. Let L be the wave equationOperator for the smooth medium
The Green’s function is the inverse operator to the wave equationFor a general source:
![Page 26: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
The Born ApproximationPerturbing the velocity field perturbs the wavefieldc= c+δc -> δL contains δc
[L +δL](u+δu) =s(ω)
Lu+ Lδu+δLu=s(ω)+O(δ )Lu≅sLδu≅−δLu
δu=−L−1δLuδu=−GδLu
![Page 27: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
Born Scattering
€
1
c 2 (x)
∂ 2U (x, t)
∂t 2 −∇2U (x, t) = f (t)δ (x − xs)
c(x) = κ (x) /ρ o
x ∈ R n : n = 1,2,3
€
c(x) = co (x) +δc(x)
U (x, t) = Uo (x, t) +δU (x, t)
Perturb the velocity field
Assume a constant density scalar wave equation with a smoothly varying velocity field c(x)
![Page 28: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
€
1
c 2
∂ 2δU
∂t 2 −∇2δU =2δc
c 3
∂ 2U (x, t)
∂t 2
Born Scattering: Solve for the perturbed field to first order
€
1
c 2 (x)
∂ 2U (x, t)
∂t 2 −∇2U (x, t) = f (t)δ (x − xs)
The total field consists of two parts, the response to the smooth medium
Plus the response to the perturbed medium δU
The approximate solution satisfies two inhomogenous wave equations. Note that energy is not conserved.It is the scattered field that we use for imaging, noise is anything that doesn’t fit the scattering model
![Page 29: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29
€
U PS =−V
4π
ω 2
α 2
α
β
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟
2exp(−iω(t − r /β ))
r
×δZS
ZS
(sinϑ −β
αsin 2ϑ ) −
δβ
β(sinϑ +
β
αsin 2ϑ )
⎡
⎣ ⎢
⎤
⎦ ⎥
The scattering function for P to S conversion from a heterogeneityWu and Aki, 1985, Geophysics
€
ZS = ρβ
δZS
ZS
=δρ
ρ+
δβ
β
−ω 2 ⇔∂ 2
∂t 2
exp(−iω(t − r /β ))
r⇔
δ (t − r /β )
r
where
Shear wave impedance
Fourier Transform relations
![Page 30: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30
Regional Seismology: PNE DataHighly heterogeneous models of the CL
Nielsen et al, 2003, GJI
Background model is very smooth
U senses the smooth fieldδU senses the rough field
![Page 31: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31
Signal Detection:
Elastic P to S Scattering from a discrete heterogeneityWu and Aki, 1985, Geophysics
Specular P to S ConversionAki and Richards, 1980
Levander et al., 2006, Tectonophysics
![Page 32: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
32
€
I(x) =r P
r S (x) = dω F1(ω)
uScat (x,ω)
uInc(x,ω)
⎡
⎣ ⎢
⎤
⎦ ⎥∫
Definition of an image, from Scales (1995), Seismic Imaging
€
RF (x r, t) = dω∫ F2(ω)uSV (xr ,ω)
uP (xr ,ω)
⎡
⎣ ⎢
⎤
⎦ ⎥exp(−iωt)
Recall from the RF lecture the definition of a receiver function
![Page 33: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
33
A specific depropagator: Diffraction Integrals Start with two scalar wave equations, one homogeneous:
€
∇2U(r, t) −1
c2(r)
∂2
∂t2U(r, t) = 0
€
∇2G(r,ro, t) −1
c2(r)
∂2
∂t2G(r,ro, t) = −4πδ(t)δ(r − ro)
and the other the equation for the Green’s function: the response to a singularity in space and time:
![Page 34: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
34
Fourier Transform with respect to timegiving two Helmholtz equations
€
∇2U(r,ω ) + k2U(r,ω ) = 0
€
∇2G (r,rs ,ω) + k 2G (r,rs ,ω) = −4πδ (r − rs)
where k = ω/c
![Page 35: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
35
Apply Green’s Theorem, a form of representation theorem:
€
dV (r) U (r,ω)∇2G (r,rs ,ω) − G (r,rs ,ω)∇2U (r,ω)[ ]∫∫∫
€
= dS0 (r0)∫∫ U (r0,ω)∂G (r0 ,rs ,ω)
∂n− G (r0,rs ,ω)
∂U (r0 ,ω)
∂n
⎡
⎣ ⎢ ⎤
⎦ ⎥
![Page 36: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
36
Given measurements or estimates of two fields U and G, and their normal derivatives on a closed surface S defined by r0, we can predict the value of the field U anywhere within the volume, rs.
The integral has been widely used in diffraction theory and forms the basis of a class of seismic migration operators.
Use the definition of the 3D delta function to sift U(rs,ω)
€
U (rs ,ω) =−1
4πdS0 (r0)∫∫ [U (r0,ω)
∂G (r0,rs ,ω)
∂n− G (r0,rs ,ω)
∂U (r0 ,ω)
∂n]
![Page 37: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
37
We need a Green’s function
The free space asymptotic Green’s function for variable velocity can be written as
€
GFS (r,rs , t) = A(r,r' )δ t −τ (r,rs)( )
GFS (r,rs ,ω) = A(r,r' ) exp(iωτ (r,rs))
€
GFS (x, t;xt ) =δ t − r − rs /c( )
4π r − rs
The constant velocity free space Green’s function is given by
![Page 38: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
38
Here (r,rs) is the solution to the eikonal equation:
And A(r,rs) is the solution to the transport equation:
The solution is referred to as a high-frequency or asymptotic solution. Both equations are solved numerically
€
∇ (r,rs) =1
c(r)
€
2∇τ ⋅∇A − ∇2τ( )A = 0
![Page 39: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
39
€
G (ro ,rs ,ω) = A(r0 ,rs) exp(iωτ (r0 ,rs)) − A(r0 ,rs ' ) exp(iωτ (r0 ,rs ' )
We want a Green’s function that vanishes on So, or
one whose derivative vanishes on So
Recenter the coordinate system so that z=0 lies in SA Green’s function which vanishes at z=0 is given by:
Where r’s is the image around x of rs. At z=0
€
∂G
∂n= 2
∂GFS
∂n z=0
This is also approximately true if So has topography with wavelength long compared to the incident field. This is called Kirchhoff’s approximation.
![Page 40: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
40
The diffraction integral becomes
€
U(r,ω ) =−1
2πdS0∫ U(r0 ,ω )[
∂A
∂n+ iωA
∂τ
∂n] exp(iωτ )
Assume that the phase fluctuations are greater than the amplitude fluctuations we can throw away the first term. This is a far field approximation:
€
U (r,ω) =iω
2πdS0∫ U (r0 ,ω)
A(r0 ,r) cosθ
c(r0)exp(iωτ )
This is the Rayleigh-Sommerfeld diffraction integral(Sommerfeld, 1932, Optics)
If we use it to backward propagate the wavefield, rather than forward propagate it, it is an imaging integral.
![Page 41: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
41
Imaging ConditionThe imaging condition is given by the time it took the source
to arrive at the scatterer plus the time it took the scattered waves to arrive at the receiver. If we have an accurate description of c( r) then the waves are focused at the scattering point. (attributed to Jon Claerbout)
The image is as good as the velocity model.
For an incident P-wave and a scattered S-wave, and an observation at ro, then the image would focus at point r, when
€
0 = τ p (r,re ) +τ s (ro ,r) − te (ro ,re )
![Page 42: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
42
€
I (r) =1
4π 2 dω−∞
∞
∫ (iω) dS0− L
L
∫ exp(−iω(t − (τ p +τ s )))U (r0 ,ω)A(r,r0) cosθ
c(r0)t=τ p+τ s
Because the phase is zero at the imaging point, the inverse Fourier transform becomes a frequency sum
Recall that U is a receiver function and the desired image is
€
I (x) =r P
r S (x) = dω F1(ω )
u SV (x,ω )
uP (x,ω )
⎡
⎣ ⎢
⎤
⎦ ⎥∫
€
SPS (r) = AS (r) /AP (r)
Define
![Page 43: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
43
€
I (r) =r P
r S (r) =
1
4π 2 dω−∞
∞
∫ (iω) dS0− L
L
∫ exp(−iω(t − (τ P +τ S ))RF (r0,ω)AS (r,r0) cosθ (r0)
AP (r,re )β (r0)t= te
![Page 44: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
44
S(x,z)
P(x,z)
![Page 45: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
45
Sensitivities• Spatial aliasing and Aperture
– First Fresnel zone has to be well sampled in a Fourier sense
– Generally 2L > ztarget We need lots of receivers
€
RF ≈ zt argetλ
Δx =βmin
2 fmax sinθ
€
Ninstruments = M *2R f /Δx
Ninstruments = M *4 fmax sinθ f zt arg etλ
βmin
Ex: =3.6, f=0.5, 45 degx = 5 km
L~1000 km
400 stations
![Page 46: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
46
• Data redundancy– Redundancy builds Signal/(Random Noise) as
N0.5, where N is the number of data contributing at a given image point: N=Nevent*Nreceiver
– Events from different incidence angles, i.e. source distances, suppresses reverberations
– Events from different incidence angles reconstruct a larger angular spectrum of the target
![Page 47: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
47
Other considerations
1. A good starting velocity model is required– Use the travel-time tomography model
2. Data preconditioning– DC removal – Frequency filter– Remove the direct wave and other signals that
don’t fit the scattering model– Wavenumber filters (ouch!)
![Page 48: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
48
![Page 49: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
49
Vp~ 7.75 km/s1% Partial Melt
![Page 50: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
50
![Page 51: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
51
Jemez Lineament: Mazatzal-Yavapai BoundaryJemez Lineament: Mazatzal-Yavapai
Zone of melt production
![Page 52: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
52
![Page 53: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
53
![Page 54: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
54
Structures from basalt extraction
Oman ophiolite
![Page 55: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
55
RISTRA Receiver FunctionsDeepProbe
![Page 56: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
56
Example: Kaapvaal Craton
x ~ 35 kmAL ~ 20o
9 Eqs
![Page 57: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
57
Levander et al., 2005,AGU Monograph
![Page 58: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
58RF from Niu et al., 2004, EPSL
![Page 59: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
59
Bostock et al.,
2001, 2002
Generalized Radon Transform
![Page 60: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
60
Alaska Subduction Zone
dVp/Vo (Ppdp)dVs/Vo (Pds, Ppds, Psds)
dV/V0 (%)
0 10-10
Rondenay et al., 2008
![Page 61: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
61
![Page 62: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
62
![Page 63: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
63
![Page 64: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
64
![Page 65: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
65
![Page 66: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
66
CMB Imaging using ScS precursors and the Generalized Radon Transform
Wang et al., 2006Ma et al., 2008
![Page 67: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
67
D’’ Wang et al., 2006; Ma et al, 2008
![Page 68: Array Methods for Image Formation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062520/56815928550346895dc650be/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
68
SummaryData redundancy suppresses noise.Noise is whatever doesn’t fit the scattering model.
The image is only as good as the 1. The velocity model 2. The completeness of the dataset3. The assumptions the imaging system is based on.4. We use a single-scattering assumption