energies
Article
Analysis of a Solar Cooling System for ClimaticConditions of Five Different Cities of Saudi ArabiaM. Mujahid Rafique 1, Shafiqur Rehman 2,*, Aref Lashin 3,4 and Nassir Al Arifi 5
1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran 31261,Saudi Arabia; [email protected]
2 Center for Engineering Research, Research Institute, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals,Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
3 College of Engineering, Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Department, King Saud University,P.O. Box 800, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia; [email protected]
4 Faculty of Science, Geology Department, Benha University, P.O. Box 13518, Benha 345629, Egypt5 College of Science, Geology and Geophysics Department, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2455,
Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia; [email protected]* Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +966-13-8603802
Academic Editor: Kamel HoomanReceived: 8 December 2015; Accepted: 19 January 2016; Published: 27 January 2016
Abstract: Air high in humidity leads to uncomfortable conditions and promotes the growth ofdifferent fungi and bacteria, which may cause health problems. The control of moisture content inthe air using traditional air conditioning techniques is not a suitable option due to large consumptionof primary energy and hence emission of greenhouse gases. The evaporative cooling technology is acost effective and eco-friendly alternative but can provide thermal comfort conditions only under lowhumidity conditions. However, the evaporative cooling method can be used effectively in conjunctionwith desiccant dehumidifiers for better control of humidity. Such systems can control the temperatureand humidity of the air independently and can effectively utilize the low-grade thermal energyresources. In this paper, the theoretical analysis of desiccant based evaporative cooling systemsis carried out for five cities in Saudi Arabia (Jeddah, Jazan, Riyadh, Hail, and Dhahran). It hasbeen observed that the coefficient of performance (COP) of the system varies from 0.275 to 0.476for different locations. The water removal capacity of the desiccant wheel is at its maximum for theclimatic conditions of Jazan and at its minimum for Hail. The effect of climatic conditions of five citieson regeneration temperature, air mass flow rate, and potential of solar energy has been evaluatedusing RET Screen software.
Keywords: thermal cooling; desiccant wheel; evaporative cooling; clean technology; energy saving;Saudi Arabia
1. Introduction
In order to provide comfortable indoor conditions, cooling requirements should be consideredin terms of both the sensible and latent cooling capacities, especially for hot and humid outdoorconditions. The basic requirements for the human comfort provided by the air conditioning system areillustrated in Figure 1 [1]. To control the air humidity using a vapor compression system, the air iscooled below its dew point temperature to extract the moisture and then reheated again to the desiredsupply temperature, which increases the electricity bill significantly. The heating, ventilating and airconditioning (HVAC) load of the world is estimated to rise 6.2% per year [2]. It is well known fact thata considerable part of the primary energy is used for air conditioning purposes. Furthermore, it isworthwhile observing that:
Energies 2016, 9, 75; doi:10.3390/en9020075 www.mdpi.com/journal/energies
Energies 2016, 9, 75 2 of 13
‚ The most recent standards regarding environmental comfort and indoor air quality (IAQ) imposerestrictive limits to indoor relative humidity values.
‚ Chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) and Hydro Chlorofluorocarbon (HCFC) refrigerant fluids are expectedto disappear.
‚ Electric power peaks need to be reduced.
Therefore, it seems necessary to develop new air conditioning techniques. Thermal airconditioning systems based on chemical dehumidification are characterized by high energy efficiencyand low environmental impact. These systems can have profitable results if compared to traditionalair conditioning systems [3–6].
Energies 2016, 9, 75 2 of 12
The most recent standards regarding environmental comfort and indoor air quality (IAQ)
impose restrictive limits to indoor relative humidity values.
Chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) and Hydro Chlorofluorocarbon (HCFC) refrigerant fluids are
expected to disappear.
Electric power peaks need to be reduced.
Therefore, it seems necessary to develop new air conditioning techniques. Thermal air
conditioning systems based on chemical dehumidification are characterized by high energy
efficiency and low environmental impact. These systems can have profitable results if compared to
traditional air conditioning systems [3–6].
Figure 1. The functions of air conditioning
The humid air has high partial vapor pressure while desiccant materials create an area of lower
surface vapor pressure. This difference of vapor pressure causes transfer of moisture from air to the
desiccant material [7]. The desiccant material is desired to have a low surface vapor pressure for
better dehumidification of the air. The surface vapor pressure of desiccant material increases as it
absorbs moisture from the air. Regeneration heat is supplied to keep the desiccant dry and have
lower surface vapor pressure. The desiccant material may be solid or liquid. Solid desiccants
inserted in a rotary heat exchanger [8], called desiccant wheel (DW) are utilized, especially in
HVAC applications.
The idea of desiccant cooling technology was first introduced by Hausen in 1935 [9]. Many
inventors like Shipman [10], Fleisher [11], Larriva [12] and Altenkirch [13,14] made efforts to
develop desiccant cooling systems for commercial air conditioning using this idea but were not too
successful at that time.
The desiccant evaporative cooling systems lead to remarkable reductions in electrical energy
consumption as compared to conventional units and also reduce the number of discomfort hours
inside the conditioned zone. The costs of energy are almost halved using hybrid desiccant cooling
instead of conventional cooling systems alone [15]. Fairey et al. [16] introduced an idea of passive
solar desiccant cooling called Desiccant Enhanced Nocturnal Radiation (DESRAD). The system
utilizes a hybrid desiccant cooling system integrated in the roof to control both the sensible and
latent loads in hot and humid climates. This proposed system had two modes of operation—the
night adsorption and the daytime desorption. The desiccant is regenerated during the day by solar
heat. Kim and Jeong [17] investigated the solid desiccant and evaporative cooling system based on
100% outdoor air to observe the thermal and energy performance of the system. Both indirect
evaporative cooler (IEC) and direct evaporative cooler (DEC) were utilized in their work. The
results showed that this system could save about 74%–77% of total system operating energy as
compared to the conventional systems.
Figure 1. The functions of air conditioning.
The humid air has high partial vapor pressure while desiccant materials create an area of lowersurface vapor pressure. This difference of vapor pressure causes transfer of moisture from air to thedesiccant material [7]. The desiccant material is desired to have a low surface vapor pressure for betterdehumidification of the air. The surface vapor pressure of desiccant material increases as it absorbsmoisture from the air. Regeneration heat is supplied to keep the desiccant dry and have lower surfacevapor pressure. The desiccant material may be solid or liquid. Solid desiccants inserted in a rotaryheat exchanger [8], called desiccant wheel (DW) are utilized, especially in HVAC applications.
The idea of desiccant cooling technology was first introduced by Hausen in 1935 [9]. Manyinventors like Shipman [10], Fleisher [11], Larriva [12] and Altenkirch [13,14] made efforts to developdesiccant cooling systems for commercial air conditioning using this idea but were not too successfulat that time.
The desiccant evaporative cooling systems lead to remarkable reductions in electrical energyconsumption as compared to conventional units and also reduce the number of discomfort hoursinside the conditioned zone. The costs of energy are almost halved using hybrid desiccant coolinginstead of conventional cooling systems alone [15]. Fairey et al. [16] introduced an idea of passive solardesiccant cooling called Desiccant Enhanced Nocturnal Radiation (DESRAD). The system utilizes ahybrid desiccant cooling system integrated in the roof to control both the sensible and latent loads inhot and humid climates. This proposed system had two modes of operation—the night adsorption andthe daytime desorption. The desiccant is regenerated during the day by solar heat. Kim and Jeong [17]investigated the solid desiccant and evaporative cooling system based on 100% outdoor air to observethe thermal and energy performance of the system. Both indirect evaporative cooler (IEC) and directevaporative cooler (DEC) were utilized in their work. The results showed that this system could saveabout 74%–77% of total system operating energy as compared to the conventional systems.
Suryawanshi et al. [18] concluded that a two-stage evaporative cooler was 4.5 times more efficientthan the conventional system but only in hot and dry climatic conditions. For the hot and humid
Energies 2016, 9, 75 3 of 13
climatic conditions, it could be combined with a desiccant dehumidifier. Mohammad et al. [19] foundfrom the experimental results that an evaporative cooler can be used effectively in conjunction with thedesiccant dehumidifier to provide the comfort conditions for the climatic conditions of Kuala Lumpur,Malaysia. Table 1 presents a comparison between desiccant cooling and conventional air conditioningsystems to show the significance of desiccant cooling systems [20].
Table 1. Comparison between desiccant cooling system and conventional air conditioning system [20].
Parameter Central Air Conditioning System Desiccant Dehumidification System
Cost of Operation High Saves about 40%
Driving Source of Energy Electricity, Natural gas Low grade energy e.g., solar energy,waste heat, etc.
Humidity Control Average Accurate
Quality of Indoor Air Average Good
System Installment Easy and well-known Slightly complicated
Capacity for Storage of Energy Average Good
Need of Alternative Energy Systems in Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia lies between 16˝21158” N and 32˝9157” N latitudes and 34˝33148” E and 55˝41129” Elongitudes. The country occupies about 80% of the area of the Arabian Peninsula. A great extreme intemperature, humidity and wide seasonal variations exists in the region [21]. The geographical map ofSaudi Arabia showing 13 districts and 29 meteorological stations is shown in Figure 2 [22].
Table 2 presents energy statistics for the country along with population and emission ofgreenhouse gases (CO2). The total peak electricity demand in the Kingdom and share of differentsectors is shown in Figures 3 and 4 respectively. The residential sector consumes about 53% of totalelectricity demand. This share of the residential sector in the Kingdom is a higher proportion ascompared to the global average.
Energies 2016, 9, 75 3 of 12
Suryawanshi et al. [18] concluded that a two‐stage evaporative cooler was 4.5 times more
efficient than the conventional system but only in hot and dry climatic conditions. For the hot and
humid climatic conditions, it could be combined with a desiccant dehumidifier. Mohammad et al. [19]
found from the experimental results that an evaporative cooler can be used effectively in conjunction
with the desiccant dehumidifier to provide the comfort conditions for the climatic conditions of
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Table 1 presents a comparison between desiccant cooling and
conventional air conditioning systems to show the significance of desiccant cooling systems [20].
Table 1. Comparison between desiccant cooling system and conventional air conditioning system [20].
Parameter Central Air Conditioning System Desiccant Dehumidification System
Cost of Operation High Saves about 40%
Driving Source of Energy Electricity, Natural gas Low grade energy e.g., solar energy,
waste heat, etc.
Humidity Control Average Accurate
Quality of Indoor Air Average Good
System Installment Easy and well‐known Slightly complicated
Capacity for Storage of Energy Average Good
1.1. Need of Alternative Energy Systems in Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia lies between 16°21′58″N and 32°9′57″N latitudes and 34°33′48″E and 55°41′29″E
longitudes. The country occupies about 80% of the area of the Arabian Peninsula. A great extreme in
temperature, humidity and wide seasonal variations exists in the region [21]. The geographical map
of Saudi Arabia showing 13 districts and 29 meteorological stations is shown in Figure 2 [22].
Table 2 presents energy statistics for the country along with population and emission of
greenhouse gases (CO2). The total peak electricity demand in the Kingdom and share of different
sectors is shown in Figures 3 and 4, respectively. The residential sector consumes about 53% of total
electricity demand. This share of the residential sector in the Kingdom is a higher proportion as
compared to the global average.
Figure 2. Geographic map of Saudi Arabia [22].
Figure 2. Geographic map of Saudi Arabia [22].
Energies 2016, 9, 75 4 of 13
Table 2. Energy statistics.
Parameter Amount/Value
Energy Use Per Capita 6738.42 kg of oil equivalentPopulation 27.76 million
CO2 Emissions Per Capita 17.04 metric tons
Source: World Bank.
Energies 2016, 9, 75 4 of 12
Table 2. Energy statistics.
Parameter Amount/Value
Energy Use Per Capita 6738.42 kg of oil equivalent
Population 27.76 million
CO2 Emissions Per Capita 17.04 metric tons
Source: World Bank.
Figure 3. Total peak demand of electricity in the Kingdom (MW).
Figure 4. Electricity consumption by sector (Source: Ministry of Water and Electricity).
The Middle East is known for being one of the world’s largest suppliers of fossil fuel, but it is
often realized that it is also one of the world’s biggest consumers of oil. According to the Energy
Intelligence Agency (EIA), the growth of oil consumption in the Middle East is greater as compared
to the average growth of world (about four times the global growth rate).
The high temperatures in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia throughout the year make air
conditioning a necessity for human comfort. The air conditioning industry shares about 70% of total
consumption of electricity, and this is expected to double by 2030 [23]. Therefore, the need arises for
cost‐effective and environmentally‐friendly cooling techniques that can effectively utilize the
alternative energy sources. As mentioned earlier, the desiccant based evaporative cooling is a good
and suitable alternative to overcome the fast growth in energy consumption. It can partially fulfill the
cooling demands by controlling the humidity and temperature of the building efficiently. The system
uses non‐ozone depleting refrigerants, which makes it eco‐friendly and carbon free as well [24].
Figure 3. Total peak demand of electricity in the Kingdom (MW).
Energies 2016, 9, 75 4 of 12
Table 2. Energy statistics.
Parameter Amount/Value
Energy Use Per Capita 6738.42 kg of oil equivalent
Population 27.76 million
CO2 Emissions Per Capita 17.04 metric tons
Source: World Bank.
Figure 3. Total peak demand of electricity in the Kingdom (MW).
Figure 4. Electricity consumption by sector (Source: Ministry of Water and Electricity).
The Middle East is known for being one of the world’s largest suppliers of fossil fuel, but it is
often realized that it is also one of the world’s biggest consumers of oil. According to the Energy
Intelligence Agency (EIA), the growth of oil consumption in the Middle East is greater as compared
to the average growth of world (about four times the global growth rate).
The high temperatures in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia throughout the year make air
conditioning a necessity for human comfort. The air conditioning industry shares about 70% of total
consumption of electricity, and this is expected to double by 2030 [23]. Therefore, the need arises for
cost‐effective and environmentally‐friendly cooling techniques that can effectively utilize the
alternative energy sources. As mentioned earlier, the desiccant based evaporative cooling is a good
and suitable alternative to overcome the fast growth in energy consumption. It can partially fulfill the
cooling demands by controlling the humidity and temperature of the building efficiently. The system
uses non‐ozone depleting refrigerants, which makes it eco‐friendly and carbon free as well [24].
Figure 4. Electricity consumption by sector (Source: Ministry of Water and Electricity).
The Middle East is known for being one of the world’s largest suppliers of fossil fuel, but it isoften realized that it is also one of the world’s biggest consumers of oil. According to the EnergyIntelligence Agency (EIA), the growth of oil consumption in the Middle East is greater as compared tothe average growth of world (about four times the global growth rate).
The high temperatures in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia throughout the year make air conditioninga necessity for human comfort. The air conditioning industry shares about 70% of total consumption ofelectricity, and this is expected to double by 2030 [23]. Therefore, the need arises for cost-effective andenvironmentally-friendly cooling techniques that can effectively utilize the alternative energy sources.As mentioned earlier, the desiccant based evaporative cooling is a good and suitable alternative toovercome the fast growth in energy consumption. It can partially fulfill the cooling demands bycontrolling the humidity and temperature of the building efficiently. The system uses non-ozonedepleting refrigerants, which makes it eco-friendly and carbon free as well [24].
Energies 2016, 9, 75 5 of 13
Saudi Arabia observes high values of global solar radians and long sunshine duration throughoutthe year [25,26]. The solar energy has been proved to be technologically and economically feasiblein Saudi Arabia in particular [27,28] and in the region in general. In this paper, a feasibility analysisof a solid desiccant cooling system operating in conjunction with an evaporative cooler is carriedout for five cities of Saudi Arabia. The study has been carried out keeping in view the large amountof energy being consumed for air conditioning in Saudi Arabia, and an effort is made to propose aclean and energy efficient cooling system for different parts of the country. The performance of thesystem has been analyzed considering different parameters such as the air flow rates and regenerationtemperature. In addition, the effect of ambient conditions on the performance of the system hasbeen examined.
2. Solid Desiccant Based Evaporative Cooling System
Desiccant wheel impregnated with adsorbent materials like silica gel, titanium dioxide, etc.,slowly rotates to interact with both streams of process and regeneration air. The desiccant wheelremoves moisture from the ambient hot and humid air and temperature of air leaving the desiccantdehumidifier reduced to the desired supply conditions using an evaporative cooler or some othersensible cooling media. The regeneration air is heated up to the desired regeneration temperatureto remove the moisture from the desiccant wheel adsorbed by the desiccant from process air stream.The value of regeneration temperature depends on the desiccant material used.
2.1. System Description
Figure 5a,b shows a desiccant based evaporative cooling system operating on ventilation cycleand its psychrometric processes. The sequence of processes for the process air stream is as follows:(1–2) moisture is removed from the processed air using a desiccant wheel; (2–3) air leaving thedesiccant wheel is cooled using heat recovery wheel; (3–4) processed air is further cooled to thecomfort conditions using evaporative cooler; (4–5) finally, processed air is supplied to the room.
The operating sequence for the return or regeneration air stream is as follows: (5–6) return air iscooled in the evaporative cooler to its saturation point; (6–7) cooled return air exchanges heat withhot process air in heat recovery wheel; (7–8) air is heated to the required regeneration temperatureusing solar collector or auxiliary heater; (8–9) finally, hot air passes through the desiccant wheel toregenerate it.
Energies 2016, 9, 75 5 of 12
Saudi Arabia observes high values of global solar radians and long sunshine duration
throughout the year [25,26]. The solar energy has been proved to be technologically and
economically feasible in Saudi Arabia in particular [27,28] and in the region in general. In this
paper, a feasibility analysis of a solid desiccant cooling system operating in conjunction with an
evaporative cooler is carried out for five cities of Saudi Arabia. The study has been carried out
keeping in view the large amount of energy being consumed for air conditioning in Saudi Arabia,
and an effort is made to propose a clean and energy efficient cooling system for different parts of
the country. The performance of the system has been analyzed considering different parameters
such as the air flow rates and regeneration temperature. In addition, the effect of ambient
conditions on the performance of the system has been examined.
2. Solid Desiccant Based Evaporative Cooling System
Desiccant wheel impregnated with adsorbent materials like silica gel, titanium dioxide, etc.,
slowly rotates to interact with both streams of process and regeneration air. The desiccant wheel
removes moisture from the ambient hot and humid air and temperature of air leaving the desiccant
dehumidifier reduced to the desired supply conditions using an evaporative cooler or some other
sensible cooling media. The regeneration air is heated up to the desired regeneration temperature to
remove the moisture from the desiccant wheel adsorbed by the desiccant from process air stream.
The value of regeneration temperature depends on the desiccant material used.
2.1. System Description
Figure 5a,b shows a desiccant based evaporative cooling system operating on ventilation cycle
and its psychrometric processes. The sequence of processes for the process air stream is as follows:
(1–2) moisture is removed from the processed air using a desiccant wheel; (2–3) air leaving the
desiccant wheel is cooled using heat recovery wheel; (3–4) processed air is further cooled to the
comfort conditions using evaporative cooler; (4–5) finally, processed air is supplied to the room.
The operating sequence for the return or regeneration air stream is as follows: (5–6) return air
is cooled in the evaporative cooler to its saturation point; (6–7) cooled return air exchanges heat
with hot process air in heat recovery wheel; (7–8) air is heated to the required regeneration
temperature using solar collector or auxiliary heater; (8–9) finally, hot air passes through the
desiccant wheel to regenerate it.
(a)
Figure 5. Cont. Figure 5. Cont.
Energies 2016, 9, 75 6 of 13
Energies 2016, 9, 75 6 of 12
(b)
Figure 5. (a) Schematic diagram of a desiccant based evaporative cooling system; (b) psychrometric
representation of processes.
2.2. Solar Collector Subsystem
The required regeneration energy for the solid desiccant system is provided by a solar subsystem.
The system components and their configuration are shown in Figure 5. The system compromises an
array of solar collectors with area of 50 m2 and a 50% propylene glycol/water solution at an average
flow rate of 0.015 kg/s∙m2 of collector area [29] as the working fluid to transfer the energy using a
heat exchanger. An auxiliary heater is also installed in series with a hot water storage tank for
continuous operation of the system in the absence of sunlight. For the recommended storage
volume of 50–100 L/m2 of a collector area, an average value of 0.075 m3/m2 of collector area is
chosen. General expression for collector efficiency and useful energy gain is given as [30]:
η (τα ) ( )u
c R R i ac
QF F T T
A G
(1)
(τα) ( )u R c R L c i aQ F A G F U A T T (2)
where FR (τα) = 0.777 and FRUL = 15.8424 W/m2.
2.3. Solar Fraction
In solar cooling applications, solar collectors convert solar radiations into thermal energy. The
backup heating source is provided with the solar collector to supplement the insufficient thermal
energy provided by the solar collectors in cloudy weathers. The percentage of solar energy
provided by the solar collectors is known as the solar fraction (SF) and given as [31]:
u
t
QSF
Q
(3)
3. Performance Parameters
The system’s coefficient of performance (COP) is given as the ratio of the system cooling load
and heat needed for regeneration:
COPCooling LoadInput heat
(4)
where the cooling load of the cycle is given as:
Figure 5. (a) Schematic diagram of a desiccant based evaporative cooling system; (b) psychrometricrepresentation of processes.
2.2. Solar Collector Subsystem
The required regeneration energy for the solid desiccant system is provided by a solar subsystem.The system components and their configuration are shown in Figure 5. The system compromises anarray of solar collectors with area of 50 m2 and a 50% propylene glycol/water solution at an averageflow rate of 0.015 kg/s¨m2 of collector area [29] as the working fluid to transfer the energy usinga heat exchanger. An auxiliary heater is also installed in series with a hot water storage tank forcontinuous operation of the system in the absence of sunlight. For the recommended storage volumeof 50–100 L/m2 of a collector area, an average value of 0.075 m3/m2 of collector area is chosen. Generalexpression for collector efficiency and useful energy gain is given as [30]:
ηc “Qu
Ac ´ G“ FRpταq ´ FRpTi ´ Taq (1)
Qu “ FR Ac rGpταqs ´ FRUL AcpTi ´ Taq (2)
where FR (τα) = 0.777 and FRUL = 15.8424 W/m2.
2.3. Solar Fraction
In solar cooling applications, solar collectors convert solar radiations into thermal energy.The backup heating source is provided with the solar collector to supplement the insufficient thermalenergy provided by the solar collectors in cloudy weathers. The percentage of solar energy providedby the solar collectors is known as the solar fraction (SF) and given as [31]:
SF “Qu
Qt(3)
3. Performance Parameters
The system’s coefficient of performance (COP) is given as the ratio of the system cooling load andheat needed for regeneration:
COP “Cooling Load
Input heat(4)
where the cooling load of the cycle is given as:
Qc “.
mpph1 ´ h4q (5)
Energies 2016, 9, 75 7 of 13
The desiccant wheel regeneration heat is given by:
Qr “.
mrph8 ´ h7q (6)
The total capacity of moisture removal for the system is represented as the moisture absorbedfrom the air by the desiccant wheel and is calculated as [32]:
Mp “.
mppω1 ´ω2q (7)
4. Results and Discussion
A code has been developed in an Engineering Equation Solver (EES) using mathematical modelequations, and performance of the system is investigated. The performance curve of desiccant wheel,psychrometric chart, and mathematical equations developed by Camargo et al. [33] have been used forcomputing the temperatures and humidity ratio of the air at different points in the cycle. The built infunction of the Engineering Equation Solver (EES) is used to obtain the thermodynamic properties ofthe air. In addition, it is assumed that effectiveness of evaporative coolers and heat recovery wheelvaries from 75% to 95%.
Five different cities of Saudi Arabia have been selected to analyze the performance of the systemfor the climatic conditions of each city. Table 3 summarizes the geographical data of five cities usedin the present analysis. The weather data has been obtained from RET Screen software [34] andlisted in Table 4 along with desired indoor supply conditions. The obtained value of average COP atregeneration temperature of 120 ˝C have also been presented and compared in Table 4. The COP ofthe system is largely influenced by inlet air temperature and humidity ratio. It is observed that thesystem can operate with the highest COP of 0.475 for the climatic conditions of Jazan while the lowestCOP of the system is found for Hail.
Figure 6 shows the variation of COP with the effectiveness of the evaporative cooler for differentcities. The effectiveness of evaporative cooler is varied from 75% to 95% to observe its effect on COP ofthe system. It can be observed from the Figure 6 that COP of the system increases with the increase ineffectiveness of evaporative cooler for all cities under study. About a 30%–50% increase in COP can beachieved by increasing about 15% effectiveness of the direct evaporative cooler.
Table 3. Geographic data of study related cities.
Location Jeddah Jazan Riyadh Hail Dhahran
Latitudes (ø) 21.7 16.9 24.7 27.4 26.3Longitude 39.2 42.6 46.7 41.7 50.2
Elevation (m) 17 7 620 1002 17Wind speed (m/s) 3.6 3.3 0.5 3.2 4.4
Table 4. Average outdoor conditions, supply conditions, and coefficient of performance of a desiccantcooling cycle for different cities of Kingdom Saudi Arabia (KSA).
Name ofCities
Outdoor Air Supply AirCOP
(Treg = 120 ˝C)Dry BulbTemperature
(˝C)
Wet BulbTemperature
(˝C)
SpecificHumidity
(g/kg)
Dry BulbTemperature
(˝C)
Wet BulbTemperature
(˝C)
SpecificHumidity
(g/kg)
Jeddah 32.7 24.8 16.76 19.85 16.05 10.30 0.447Jazan 33.6 26.93 20.06 20.33 18.55 11.42 0.476
Riyadh 34.8 25.13 19.50 19.80 17.90 10.43 0.387Hail 32.6 22.23 15.93 18.33 16.42 9.46 0.275
Dhahran 36.1 26.53 18.29 21.77 18.22 10.22 0.463
Energies 2016, 9, 75 8 of 13
Energies 2016, 9, 75 8 of 12
Figure 6. Variation of coefficient of performance with effectiveness of evaporative cooler.
The partial vapor pressure is the governing factor for the mass transfer between processed air
and desiccant surface. As the inlet air humidity ratio increases, the partial vapor pressure of water
vapor in the air also increases. This, in turn, increases the difference between the partial vapor
pressure of the inlet air stream and the desiccant surface. Ultimately, this increases the moisture
removing capacity of desiccant. The temperature of air at the exit of the desiccant wheel increases as
the temperature of the ambient air increases. This increase in the difference of temperature
increases the difference in enthalpy of the air across the rotary dehumidifier. This increased
difference in enthalpy causes an increase in the cooling capacity of the system.
The flow rate of regeneration air and temperature has a strong impact on the performance of
the desiccant cooling system. The performance improvement of the system is expected at lower
regeneration temperature and air mass flow rate because both of these factors have a direct effect on
required input thermal energy. The thermal energy input increases with the increase in
regeneration temperature, which will decrease the overall COP of the system.
The variation of COP with regeneration temperature and the ratio of regeneration and
processed air flow rate are shown in Figures 7 and 8, respectively. The regeneration temperature is
varied from 90 to 180 °C to observe its effect on the system performance. It is observed that, as the
regeneration temperature increases, the COP of the system decreases as illustrated in Figure 7.
Similarly, an increase in the air flow rate ratio tends to decrease the COP of the system. The
decrease in the system COP due to an increase in both the regeneration temperature and the mass
flow rate ratio is due to the increase in required regeneration heat. Although the higher value of
regeneration temperature will make the moisture removal process faster, at the same time this
higher value of temperature will dry‐up the desiccant wheel before the completion of regeneration
period. Hence, some added energy will be wasted and will not be utilized during moisture
removal. The increase in regeneration temperature and regeneration to processed air flow rate ratio
(or increase in regeneration air flow rate) will increase the required regeneration heat, which, in
turn, will decrease the COP of the system. Figure 9 presents the moisture removal rate from the
processed air for different cities. It is observed that the water removal rate is at its maximum for
Jazan and at its minimum for Hail.
0.7 0.75 0.8 0.85 0.9 0.95
0.24
0.32
0.4
0.48
Effectiveness of EC [-]
Coe
ffic
ient
of
perf
orm
ance
(C
OP)
Dhahran
Hail
Riyadh
Jazan
Jeddah
Regeneration Temperature = 120oC
Figure 6. Variation of coefficient of performance with effectiveness of evaporative cooler.
The partial vapor pressure is the governing factor for the mass transfer between processed air anddesiccant surface. As the inlet air humidity ratio increases, the partial vapor pressure of water vapor inthe air also increases. This, in turn, increases the difference between the partial vapor pressure of theinlet air stream and the desiccant surface. Ultimately, this increases the moisture removing capacityof desiccant. The temperature of air at the exit of the desiccant wheel increases as the temperatureof the ambient air increases. This increase in the difference of temperature increases the differencein enthalpy of the air across the rotary dehumidifier. This increased difference in enthalpy causes anincrease in the cooling capacity of the system.
The flow rate of regeneration air and temperature has a strong impact on the performance ofthe desiccant cooling system. The performance improvement of the system is expected at lowerregeneration temperature and air mass flow rate because both of these factors have a direct effect onrequired input thermal energy. The thermal energy input increases with the increase in regenerationtemperature, which will decrease the overall COP of the system.
The variation of COP with regeneration temperature and the ratio of regeneration and processedair flow rate are shown in Figures 7 and 8 respectively. The regeneration temperature is varied from90 to 180 ˝C to observe its effect on the system performance. It is observed that, as the regenerationtemperature increases, the COP of the system decreases as illustrated in Figure 7. Similarly, an increasein the air flow rate ratio tends to decrease the COP of the system. The decrease in the system COP dueto an increase in both the regeneration temperature and the mass flow rate ratio is due to the increasein required regeneration heat. Although the higher value of regeneration temperature will make themoisture removal process faster, at the same time this higher value of temperature will dry-up thedesiccant wheel before the completion of regeneration period. Hence, some added energy will bewasted and will not be utilized during moisture removal. The increase in regeneration temperatureand regeneration to processed air flow rate ratio (or increase in regeneration air flow rate) will increasethe required regeneration heat, which, in turn, will decrease the COP of the system. Figure 9 presentsthe moisture removal rate from the processed air for different cities. It is observed that the waterremoval rate is at its maximum for Jazan and at its minimum for Hail.
Energies 2016, 9, 75 9 of 13
Energies 2016, 9, 75 9 of 12
Figure 7. Variation of coefficient of performance with regeneration temperature.
Figure 8. Variation of coefficient of performance with ratio of mass flow rates.
Figure 9. Variation water removal rate with inlet air humidity ratio.
100 120 140 160 1800
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
Regeneration Temperature [oC]
Coe
ffic
ient
of
perf
orm
ance
(C
OP)
Jeddah
Jazan
Riyadh
Hail
Dhahran
0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
mr/mp
Coe
ffic
ient
of
perf
orm
ance
(C
OP)
Dhahran
Hail
Riyadh
Jazan
Jeddah
Regeneration Temperature = 120oC
8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 265
10
15
20
25
30
Humidity ratio of process air [g/kg]
Wat
er r
emov
al r
ate
[g/s
]
Jedd
ah
Jaza
n
Riy
adh
Hai
l Dha
hran
Regeneration Temperature = 120oC
Figure 7. Variation of coefficient of performance with regeneration temperature.
Energies 2016, 9, 75 9 of 12
Figure 7. Variation of coefficient of performance with regeneration temperature.
Figure 8. Variation of coefficient of performance with ratio of mass flow rates.
Figure 9. Variation water removal rate with inlet air humidity ratio.
100 120 140 160 1800
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
Regeneration Temperature [oC]
Coe
ffic
ient
of
perf
orm
ance
(C
OP)
Jeddah
Jazan
Riyadh
Hail
Dhahran
0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
mr/mp
Coe
ffic
ient
of
perf
orm
ance
(C
OP)
Dhahran
Hail
Riyadh
Jazan
Jeddah
Regeneration Temperature = 120oC
8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 265
10
15
20
25
30
Humidity ratio of process air [g/kg]
Wat
er r
emov
al r
ate
[g/s
]
Jedd
ah
Jaza
n
Riy
adh
Hai
l Dha
hran
Regeneration Temperature = 120oC
Figure 8. Variation of coefficient of performance with ratio of mass flow rates.
Energies 2016, 9, 75 9 of 12
Figure 7. Variation of coefficient of performance with regeneration temperature.
Figure 8. Variation of coefficient of performance with ratio of mass flow rates.
Figure 9. Variation water removal rate with inlet air humidity ratio.
100 120 140 160 1800
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
Regeneration Temperature [oC]
Coe
ffic
ient
of
perf
orm
ance
(C
OP)
Jeddah
Jazan
Riyadh
Hail
Dhahran
0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
mr/mp
Coe
ffic
ient
of
perf
orm
ance
(C
OP)
Dhahran
Hail
Riyadh
Jazan
Jeddah
Regeneration Temperature = 120oC
8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 265
10
15
20
25
30
Humidity ratio of process air [g/kg]
Wat
er r
emov
al r
ate
[g/s
]
Jedd
ah
Jaza
n
Riy
adh
Hai
l Dha
hran
Regeneration Temperature = 120oC
Figure 9. Variation water removal rate with inlet air humidity ratio.
Energies 2016, 9, 75 10 of 13
Monthly variation of daily solar radiation on horizontal surfaces is presented in Figure 10 forall of the selected cities. On an annual basis, Jazan experiences the maximum daily solar radiations(6.24 kWh/m2/d) while Riyadh receives the minimum solar radiations (5.13 kWh/m2/d). The resultsindicate that Dhahran receives maximum solar radiations for the month of June but throughout theyear Jazan receives maximum solar radiations. It also shows that the Jeddah region has the advantageof higher solar radiations in winter season as well.
Energies 2016, 9, 75 10 of 12
Monthly variation of daily solar radiation on horizontal surfaces is presented in Figure 10 for
all of the selected cities. On an annual basis, Jazan experiences the maximum daily solar radiations
(6.24 kWh/m2/d) while Riyadh receives the minimum solar radiations (5.13 kWh/m2/d). The results
indicate that Dhahran receives maximum solar radiations for the month of June but throughout the
year Jazan receives maximum solar radiations. It also shows that the Jeddah region has the
advantage of higher solar radiations in winter season as well.
Figure 10. Monthly variation of daily solar radiation on horizontal surfaces.
5. Conclusions
The desiccant based evaporative cooling system is relatively a new technology and is a good
alternative for conventional mechanical vapor compression air conditioning systems, especially in
hot and humid climatic conditions.
In this paper, a theoretical analysis of desiccant based evaporative cooling units has been
carried out for five different cities of Saudi Arabia. It can be concluded that ambient temperature
and humidity affects the performance of desiccant based evaporative cooling systems. Five different
locations (Jeddah, Jazan, Riyadh, Hail, and Dhahran) with hot and humid climatic conditions were
found to have different potentials of desiccant based evaporative cooling units. The results of the
study can be summarized as follows:
It has been found that the effective control of dehumidification capacity can be achieved by
using desiccant based evaporative cooling systems in hot and humid climatic conditions.
For Jazan, the potential of the proposed system is found to be high to provide the thermal
comfort conditions compared to other cities.
It has also been observed that an increase of 15% in evaporative cooler effectiveness resulted in
about 15%–25% increase in COP of the system depending on the location.
An increase in regeneration temperature and ratio of air flow rate caused a decrease in the
system COP.
The effectiveness of the desiccant wheel increases with the increase in ambient air humidity ratio.
Furthermore, the results showed that moisture removal rate is the maximum for the climatic
conditions of Jazan.
Among all five cities, Jazan was found to have the maximum solar energy potential for the
whole year while Riyadh has the minimum.
The lower value of regeneration temperature is beneficial for the performance of the system,
as it defines the required input energy.
Figure 10. Monthly variation of daily solar radiation on horizontal surfaces.
5. Conclusions
The desiccant based evaporative cooling system is relatively a new technology and is a goodalternative for conventional mechanical vapor compression air conditioning systems, especially in hotand humid climatic conditions.
In this paper, a theoretical analysis of desiccant based evaporative cooling units has been carriedout for five different cities of Saudi Arabia. It can be concluded that ambient temperature and humidityaffects the performance of desiccant based evaporative cooling systems. Five different locations(Jeddah, Jazan, Riyadh, Hail, and Dhahran) with hot and humid climatic conditions were found tohave different potentials of desiccant based evaporative cooling units. The results of the study can besummarized as follows:
‚ It has been found that the effective control of dehumidification capacity can be achieved by usingdesiccant based evaporative cooling systems in hot and humid climatic conditions.
‚ For Jazan, the potential of the proposed system is found to be high to provide the thermal comfortconditions compared to other cities.
‚ It has also been observed that an increase of 15% in evaporative cooler effectiveness resulted inabout 15%–25% increase in COP of the system depending on the location.
‚ An increase in regeneration temperature and ratio of air flow rate caused a decrease in thesystem COP.
‚ The effectiveness of the desiccant wheel increases with the increase in ambient air humidity ratio.‚ Furthermore, the results showed that moisture removal rate is the maximum for the climatic
conditions of Jazan.‚ Among all five cities, Jazan was found to have the maximum solar energy potential for the whole
year while Riyadh has the minimum.‚ The lower value of regeneration temperature is beneficial for the performance of the system,
as it defines the required input energy.
Energies 2016, 9, 75 11 of 13
For better coefficient of performance of the overall system, the desiccant material should havea lower temperature of regeneration, which is a key factor for future research. The desiccant basedevaporative cooling technology can first be targeted for commercial buildings rather than residentialbuildings because of high energy and financial payback in hot and humid climatic conditions.
Acknowledgments: The authors would like to thank King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals in Dhahran,Saudi Arabia, for funding the research reported in this paper. Furthermore, the partial support of the Deanshipof Scientific Research at King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia through the international research groupproject number IRG14-36 is greatly appreciated by Aref Lashin and Nassir Al Arifi.
Author Contributions: This paper is a result of the full collaboration of all the authors. All authors haveparticipated in preparing the research from the beginning to the end, such as establishing research design, methodand analysis. All authors discussed and finalized the analysis results to prepare manuscript according to theprogress of research.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Nomenclatures
EFan fan electrical power (kW)h specific enthalpy (kJ/kg)M moisture removal rate (g/s).
m mass flow rate (kg/s).
mw mass flow rate of water (kg/s)Qc cooling load (kW)Qr regeneration heat (kW)Treg regeneration temperature (˝C)
Greek Letters
ω humidity ratio (g/kg)ε effectiveness (-)
Subscripts
a AmbientDW desiccant wheelDCS desiccant cooling systemH HeaterHRW heat recovery wheelEC evaporative coolerp Processr Regenerationv Vapor
References
1. Ameen, A. The challenges of air-conditioning in Tropical and Humid Tropical climates. In Proceedings of theInternational Conference on Mechanical Engineering (ICME 2005), Dhaka, Bangladesh, 28–30 December 2005.
2. Rafique, M.M. A statistical analysis of desiccant dehumidifier for air conditioning application. Int. J. HybridInf. Technol. 2015, 8, 245–256. [CrossRef]
3. Meckler, M. Desiccant-assisted air conditioner improves IAQ and comfort. Heat. Pip. Air Cond. 1994,66, 75–84.
4. McGahey, K. New commercial applications for desiccant-based cooling. ASHRAE J. 1998, 40, 41–45.5. Gagliano, A.; Patania, F.; Nocera, F.; Galesi, A. Performance assessment of a solar assisted desiccant cooling
system. Therm. Sci. 2014, 18, 563–576. [CrossRef]
Energies 2016, 9, 75 12 of 13
6. Stefano, E.; Tiberi, V. Dimensioning and efficiency evaluation of hybrid solar systems for energy production.Therm. Sci. 2008, 12, 127–138.
7. Angrisani, G.; Roselli, C.; Sasso, M.; Tariello, F. Assessment of energy, environmental and economicperformance of a solar desiccant cooling system with different collector types. Energies 2014, 7, 6741–6764.[CrossRef]
8. Bulck, E. The Design of Dehumidifiers for Use in Desiccant Cooling and Dehumidification Systems, Desiccant Coolingand Dehumidification; ASHRAE: Atlanta, GA, USA, 1992; pp. 118–126.
9. Pesaran, A.A.; Penney, T.R.; Czanderna, A.W. Desiccant Cooling: State-of-the-Art Assessment; Technical ReportNo. NREL/TP-254-4147; National Renewable Energy Laboratory: Golden, CO, USA, 1992.
10. Shipman, B.C. Air Cooling and Conditioning Apparatus and System. U.S. Patent 2,058,042, 10 April 1936.11. Fleisher, W.L. Adsorption System of Air Conditioning. U.S. Patent 2,147,248, 14 February 1939.12. Larriva, G.A. Air Conditioning System and Apparatus Therefor. U.S. Patent 4,612,019, 16 December 1941.13. Altenkirch, E. Separating and Cooling Apparatus. U.S. Patent 2,233,189, 25 February 1941.14. Altenkirch, E. Air Conditioning. U.S. Patent 2,344,384, 10 June 1944.15. Maclaine-Cross, I.L. Proposal for a desiccant air conditioning system. ASHRAE Trans. 1988, 94, 1997–2009.16. Fairey, P.; Kerestecioglu, A.; Vieira, R. Analytical Investigation of the Desiccant Enhanced Nocturnal Radiation
Cooling Concepts; Final Technical Report No. FSEC-CR-152-86; Florida Solar Energy Center: Cape Canaveral,FL, USA, 1986.
17. Kim, M.; Jeong, J. Development of Desiccant and Evaporative Cooling Based 100% Outdoor System.In Proceedings of the 2013 Architectural Engineering Conference, State College, PA, USA, 3–5 April 2013;pp. 506–515.
18. Suryawanshi, S.D.; Chordia, T.M.; Nenwani, N.; Bawaskar, H.; Yambal, S. Efficient technique of airconditioning. In Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering, London, UK, 6–8 July 2011; Volume III.
19. Mohammad, A.T.; Mat, S.B.; Sulaiman, M.Y.; Sopian, K. Experimental performance of a direct evaporativecooler operating in Kuala Lumpur. Int. J. Therm. Environ. Eng. 2013, 6, 15–20.
20. Jiang, Y.; Li, Z.; Chen, X.L.; Liu, X.H. Liquid desiccant air conditioning system and its applications. Heat Vent.Air Cond. 2004, 34, 88–98.
21. AQUASTAT. FAO’s Information System on Water and Agriculture, Climate Information Tool.Available online: http://www.fao.org/nr/water/aquastat/countries/saudi_ arabia/index.stm (accessed on21 December 2014).
22. Albakry, A.; Alsaleem, I.; Elbeishi, M. Geography of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and some other Countries, 3rd ed.;Saudi Ministry of Education: Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 2010. Available online: http://www.moe.gov.sa(accessed on 28 December 2014).
23. Saleh, A.A. Deputy Minister of Water and Electricity, ahead of the First Saudi HVAC Conference, Al-FaisaliahHotel, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 11–13 February 2013. Available online: http://www.saudigazette.com.sa/(accessed on 9 January 2015).
24. Rafique, M.M.; Gandhidasan, P.; Rehman, S.; Al-Hadhrami, L.M. A review on desiccant based evaporativecooling systems. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 45, 145–159. [CrossRef]
25. Rehman, S.; Bader, M.A.; Moallem, S.A. Cost of solar energy generated using PV panels. Renew. Sustain.Energy Rev. 2007, 11, 1843–1857. [CrossRef]
26. Mohandes, M.; Rehman, S. Estimation of sunshine duration in Saudi Arabia. J. Renew. Sustain. Energy 2013, 5.[CrossRef]
27. Rehman, S.; El-Amin, I. Study of a solar pv/wind/diesel hybrid power system for a remotely locatedpopulation near Arar, Saudi Arabia. Energy Explor. Exploit. 2015, 33, 591–620. [CrossRef]
28. Rehman, S.; Sahin, A.Z. Performance comparison of diesel and solar photovoltaic power systems for waterpumping in Saudi Arabia. Int. J. Green Energy 2015, 12, 702–713. [CrossRef]
29. Duffie, J.; Beckman, W. Solar Engineering of Thermal Process; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1991.30. Klein, K. A Transient System Simulation Program, Version 13.1; Engineering Experiment Station Report;
University of Wiscosin-Madison, Solar Energy Laboratory: Madison, WI, USA, 1991.31. Baniyounes, A.M.; Gang, L.; Rasul, M.G.; Khan, M. Analysis of solar desiccant cooling system for an
institutional building in subtropical Queensland, Australia. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2012, 16, 6423–6431.[CrossRef]
Energies 2016, 9, 75 13 of 13
32. Daou, K.; Wang, R.Z.; Xia, Z.Z. Desiccant cooling air conditioning: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.2006, 10, 55–77. [CrossRef]
33. Camargo, J.R.; Godoy, E.; Ebinuma, C.D. An evaporative and desiccant cooling system for air conditioningin humid climates. J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 1995, 27, 1–16. [CrossRef]
34. NASA. A NASA Satellite-Derived Global Meteorology and Surface Solar Energy Climatology Website forRETScreen Parameter Inputs. Available online: https://eosweb.larc.nasa.gov/sse/RETScreen/ (accessed on11 January 2015).
© 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open accessarticle distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons by Attribution(CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).