Assessment ResultsBourbon County
Schools2013-14
School Year
Unbridled Learning
Next Generation Learners (100%)
Next Generation Support(23%)
Next Generation Professionals(10%)
Next Generation Schools and Districts
2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 ?
-Achievement-Gap-Growth-Readiness for College /Career-Graduation Rate
Program ReviewsPL/CS, Writing, The Arts
K-3 added 14-15; World Language HS
Percent Effective Teachers
Percent Effective Leaders
=
Overall AccountabilityScore
College & Career Readiness for ALL
Achievement
Gap Growth CCR GradRate
ELEM KPREP: Reading, math, ss, science, writing
All Tested Areas
Reading andMath
N/A N/A
MS KPREP: Reading, math, ss, science, writing
All Tested Areas
Reading andMath
Explore N/A
HS End of Course and On-Demand Writing
End of Course and On-Demand Writing
PLAN to ACTReading & Math
College and Career Rate
AFGR/Cohort Model
Who is Accountable for What?
Achievement
Gap Growth CCR GradRate
ELEM 30% 30% 40% -- --
MS 28% 28% 28% 16%
HS 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
Within Achievement and GAP—all areas are weighted equally except writing and language mechanics are split
16%/4%.
Growth includes Math and Reading only—K-8 from KPREP; HS from Plan to ACT.
The Test and Content
Across the board 3-12 everyone tested the same.
What is the same?
Scores include program reviews statewide◦ That means…the School Report Card now has
different scores in it from last year.
Can’t compare the overall scores—they will be quite a bit higher.
CAN compare individual area scores for each area (Achievement, Gap, Growth, proficiency of students, and other measures)
What has changed
Locked Proficient and Distinguished Levels for this year, will change next year◦ Elementary: 62.5, 69.8◦ MS: 58.7, 64.9◦ HS 58, 64.4
Progressing: Made AMO (Annual Measurable Objective)—our Annual Goal for progress.
High Performing School (90th percentile) School of Distinction (95th percentile) High Progress (Top 10% of improvement) Priority and Focus (lowest 10%, below 3rd SD in an
area)
Labels
Public reporting in the paper used a shortened ranking system; I used an extended ranking system to stick with the number of schools/districts
Provides basis for comparison for consistency
Information about how well are we adapting to CCSS compared to others
District School Rank/Labels
Rankings & Percentile Comparisons for Bourbon
Overall Score 69.7*AMO 69.8
62/173 Districts32/174 last year
83rd Percentile per reporting
*cannot be compared to previous year score
Bourbon County Schools
Clark 95/173◦ 74/174
Fayette 97/173◦ 62/174
Harrison 86/173◦ 105/174
Jessamine 66/173◦ 99/174
Mason 91/173◦ 115/175
Mercer 114/173◦ 93/174
Montgomery 29/173◦ 29/174
Nicholas 160/173◦ 111/174
Paris 139/173◦ 143/174
Pendleton 102/173◦ 121/174
Scott 57/173◦ 58/174
Madison 48/173◦ 70/174
Boyle 6/173◦ 12/174
Surrounding DistrictsCompared to BoCo’s 62/173 32/174
Each school’s ranking among their grade span
Label AMO status
◦ Proficient schools expected to make .5 gain◦ Needs improvement schools expected to make 1
point gain.
Breakdown
Cane Ridge 353/720◦ 366/739 last year◦ Needs Improvement◦ Did not make AMO
Overall 69.2 (AMO 69.4)
School Scores
Bourbon Central 332/720◦ 231/739 last year◦ Proficient School◦ Did not make AMO
Overall 69.8 (AMO 72.0)
North Middletown 274/720◦ 86/739 last year◦ Proficient School◦ Did not make AMO
71.4 (AMO 76.5)
Middle School 153/330◦ 80/328 last year◦ Proficient School◦ Did not make AMO
66.8 (AMO 68.2)◦ Focus School (Disbability/Science and Reading)—
Not New, Carryover because did not meeting AMO
High School 96/229◦ 97/232 last year◦ Proficient School, Progressing (Met AMO)
AMO 70.4◦ Focus School (Disability/Writing)—New
Designation
Professional Learning Communities—Improve Student learning
Work toward meeting AMO Move to Distinguished Status Remove Focus School Status
Next Steps