yaw project
TRANSCRIPT
1
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.0 General
Buildings are the result of the need to provide an enclosed, secured space for
people’s activities. A building must be stable, have durable sanitary and fine fire
resistant properties. For a building to serve its purpose in the long term there will be
the need to use more expensive and durable materials. (D. Walton,1999).
The building industry has developed separate but related disciplines that employ
people trained in building construction and technology .These people include:
Ø The Client (Financier)
Ø The Design Team
Ø The Contractor
Ø The Building material suppliers
Ø Building Regulators
The production of construction documents is as important as the organization of
people and materials in a building project. These construction documents mainly
include:
Ø Working drawings
Ø Specifications
Ø Bill of Quantities
The Architect being the head of the design team prepares the sketches and working
drawings based on the brief given by the client. Then based on the working
drawings the architect produces specifications for the building project whilst the
client’s Quantity Surveyors prepares Bill of Quantities for the tendering process.
Specification is a construction document that amplifies the information given in the
contract drawings and the bill of quantities and describes in detail the work to be
2
executed under the contract, the nature and quality of the materials, components
and workmanship. (Seely& Winfield, 1999)
Specifications are basically prepared by the Architect who is the head of the design
team, must have thought of the items to specified and must have followed a format
whereby those using the specification can really understand what he has written in
order to measure its constituent parts in order to come by estimates or find a
definite instructions for erecting the building.
In conjunction with the contract drawings, specifications must serve various
purposes such as information for estimators to prepare estimates, Quantity
Surveyor to prepare bill of quantities and also to be read by both the Clerk of
Works and the contractor’s agent during the progress of the contract as the
Architect’s instructions for carrying out the works.
It is essential for the Architect in writing the specification to take into
consideration what one requires and also to be able to express it clearly for the rest
of the building team to interpret it without much difficulty so as to carry out the
works to make his design a reality.
Some of the typical sections of a specification document are as follows:
Ø Substructure works
Ø Concrete works
Ø Reinforcement
Ø Formwork
Ø Blockwork
Ø Roofing
Ø Carpentry & Joinery
Ø Metal work
Ø Plumbing & Engineering Installations
Ø Electrical Installations
Ø Wall, Floor &Ceiling Finishes
3
Ø Workmanship Generally
Ø Glazing
Ø Painting &Decoration
A preliminary survey has identified the influx of many building materials which
require new specifications and different methods of construction and skill. Moreover
specifications are rarely used to reflect the composition of design.
1.1 PROBLEM STATEMENT
Ø A preliminary survey identified a variety of new building materials which are
imported.
Ø The above requires ample documentation of materials standard and
workmanship in respect of specifications.
Ø A cursory review of documentation of many past projects revealed the use of
certain pre-defined specifications irrespective of building design variety.
Ø Specifications might not be used in the right way hence affecting the quality of
the final structure.
1.2 AIM
To investigate into the current practice of specifications development and use by
building construction industry in Ghana.
1.3 OBJECTIVES
Ø To identify and document the current practice of specifications development and
use in the Ghanaian construction industry.
Ø To solicit and document the view of construction practitioners regarding the
effective development and use of specifications.
Ø To develop a workable solution to the problems associated with the development
and use of specifications in the Ghanaian construction industry
4
1.4 METHODOLOGY
In order to arrive at reliable and accurate findings, the study made use of two main
sources of data – Primary and Secondary sources.
The primary sources were questionnaires administered to some Contractors, and
Consultants (Architects, and Quantity Surveyors, Structural & Services Engineers)
The secondary sources information were obtained from published and unpublished
data, documentary sources including Journals, Newspapers and Text books relating
to the subject.
1.5 ORGANISATION OF THE STUDY
The research report is organised into five (5) inter-related chapters. Chapter One
contains the Introduction, Chapter Two reviews related Literature on the research
topic, Chapter Three looks at the field work or survey, Chapter Four contains the
analyses and discussion of field data collected and the conclusions and
recommendations are entailed in Chapter Five.
1.6 LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY
Various limitations were encountered in the course of the study. The study was
hampered by time, material and financial constraints. As other academic work had
to be handled, time was a limiting factor. Data collection was but not a major
problem though some vital information was not obtained.
5
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.0 General Overview
A Specification is a construction document that amplifies the information given in
the contract drawings and the bill of quantities and describes in detail the work to
be executed under the contract and the nature and quality of the materials,
components and workmanship. Where there is a bill of quantities, the
specification will not be a contract document unless so prescribed, and it may be
incorporated in the bill of quantities in a form of preambles. (Seely & Roger,
1999)
The architect who is the head of the design team develops the specification for a
building project and he must not draft it in a haphazard manner just as the items
are thought of, but must follow a system whereby those using the specification
visualize the whole project in advance, whether to measure its constituent parts
for an estimate or find definite instructions for erecting the building.
In Ghana, most specifications in contracts are not precise since specifications are
mostly culled from old similar contracts and inserted in a new contract thereby
leading to claims for extra payment by the contractor which would arise from the
vagueness and uncertainty of the specification in the contract and also most clerk
of works and site agents cannot interpret specifications and eventually cannot
carry out the works to the architects wishes since the specifications were
hurriedly thrown together and are out dated.
Specifications as forming an important part of a construction document have
equally important purposes for incorporating them in a construction document.
6
2.1.0 PURPOSES FOR WRITING SPECIFICATIONS
Unless the Architect grasps the purpose of the specification it cannot be prepared
successfully. In each case in conjunction with the drawings the specification may
have three purposes.
Ø To be read by the contractors estimator as the only information available on
which to prepare a competitive tender.
Ø To be read by the Client’s Quantity Surveyor to enable a bill of quantities to
be prepared as a basis for such competitive tenders.
Ø To be read by the clerk of works and the contractor’s agent during the
progress of the contract as the architect’s instructions for carrying the work.
(Willis & Willis, 1990)
2.1.1 THE SPECIFICATION AS A BASIS FOR TENDERS
Contractor’s estimators take their own measurements of the work from the
drawings and build up their estimates relying on the specification in the contract
document for a full description of quality of materials and workmanship. If
anything is omitted, something that is required is not mentioned or shown, such
work will not be part be part of the contract. If carrying out is insisted upon, the
contractor will be entitled to extra payment.
Instructions must be specific, crystal-clear and complete in detail. The specification
is a part of the contract documents and is not to be hurriedly thrown together. It
must have all the preciseness of an agreement conveying exactly to the contractor
what is wanted and protecting the building owner from claims for extra payment
which would arise from vagueness and uncertainty.
Hence specifications must follow a Common Arrangement describes how a work
section is a dual concept, involving the resources being used and also the parts of
the work being constructed, including their essential functions hence is based on
7
natural groupings of work within the building industries or; it is likely to provide
benefits in the managements of the construction stages. Not only will it be much
easier to find the required information, but also be structured by the Common
Arrangement in a manner which conforms to normal subcontracting and specialist
contracting practice.
Thus obtaining estimates from subcontractors, it will be straight forward task to
assemble the correct set of drawings, specifications clauses and bill items. In
management contracting, the Common Arrangements is likely to provide a
convenient means of identifying separate work packages. Similarly, construction
programmes based on Common Arrangement will provide direct links to other
project information, thus bringing together quantity, cost and time data into an
integrated information package.
Hence using a Common Arrangement procedure like the Common Arrangement of
Work Sections (CAWS) to prepare specifications for building works will allow for
consistent descriptions and make references easier and for easier build up of
accurate estimates for tendering.
2.1.2 THE SPECIFICATION FOR THE QUANTITY SURVEYOR
In order that the quantity surveyor may prepare the bill of quantities, instruction
must be given by the architect as complete as those required by the contractors
when taking their own measurements and these instructions are conveyed in a
specification. The quantity surveyor will find gaps in as he prepares the quantities
at every stage in the construction process has to visualized and queries sent to the
architect who prepared the specification when there are omissions to clarify issues
so as to enable the quantity surveyor to prepare adequate bills of quantities ( Willis
& Willis, 1990).
To make billing easier and faster, specifications in the contract document must
follow a common arrangement like the Common Arrangement of Work Sections
(CAWS) which the SMM7 uses and the CAWS plays a major role in coordinating
8
the arrangement of drawings, specifications and bills of quantities. To avoid
problems of overlap between similar or related works sections, each section
contains a comprehensive list of what is included in the section and what is
excluded in the, stating the appropriate section of the excluded items. Where the
quantity surveyor structures the bill on SMM7, it will eliminate any inconsistencies
between specifications and the bills of quantities (Willis & Willis, 1990)
Thus in Ghana, since most specifications for new contracts are culled from old
similar projects leads to the quantity surveyors finding difficulties in preparing bills
of quantities because those specifications will not actually match what is expected
to be carried out in the new contract. Hence leading to the quantity surveyor
sending out numerous queries to the architect for clarification.
For instance culling a specification like mix, transport,spread,consolidate and level
the 100mm over site concrete, mix 1:2:4, carefully over hardcore filling 150mm
thick, into a new contract may not actually work with the new contract since the
new contract might have different conditions from the old one for instance the mix
design.
2.1.3 THE SPECIFICATION FOR SITE AGENT AND CLERK OF WORKS
When the erection of a building starts the work will be supervised on behalf of the
contractor by the site agent and on large projects a clerk of works will be employed
to inspect works on behalf of the employer, since constant inspection will be
necessary and the architect is not expected be on site every time. Both site agent
and clerk of works require instructions and they take these, subject to any
variations ordered by the architects from the contract documents that are drawings
and specifications or drawings and bill of quantities. (Christopher J. Willis & J.
Andrew Willis, 1990)
Where quantities have been prepared the quantity surveyor will have incorporated
the specifications in the descriptions or in the preambles in the bill. There is
however, certain information required by the site agent and the clerk of works,
9
which will have been excluded from the bill. The location of the various items for
instance will no be visually mentioned in the bill because they do not normally
affect price: however the site agent must have this information when erecting the
building.
For instance it may be read that supply and lay hardcore bed in layers 150mm
thick. The quantity surveyor will have duly noted in taking the measurements so
there will be no need to state the requirements in the bill. However when it comes
to erection, the site agent must have this direction which in this case would
probably have shown on the drawings. (Willis & Willis, 1990)
2.2.0 THE CONTENTS OF A SPECIFICATION
The specification is drafted to convey to the reader all the information about a
proposed building which the architect cannot easily represent on the drawings. For
instance, the quality of a material to be used and the way concrete is laid and
compacted cannot be shown on a drawing, except by adding such full written notes
or a large scale details that their main purpose is obscured. ( Willis & Willis, 1990)
On the other hand without this supplementary information the estimator, working
without quantities, cannot prepare the tender. Contractor’s estimators take their own
measurements of the work from the drawings and build up their estimates relying
on the specification in the contract document for a full description of quality of
materials and workmanship.
If quantities are being supplied, the quantity surveyor is in equal difficulty in
preparing them as the architect wishes are not known. Hence the specification must
be specific, crystal-clear and complete in detail and must follow a common
arrangement like the CAWS which the SMM7 uses so as to make the preparation of
the bill of quantities faster and easier. (Willis & Willis, 1990)
10
2.3.0 ESSENTIALS IN SPECIFICATION WRITING
There are two essentials in drafting specifications
2.3.1 To know what the architect requires
The architect being the designer and the writer of the specification must be able to
bring out each and every detail of work to be carried if he really what his wishes to
be carried out and the actual realization of his design into a completed building
without any construction defects. These construction defects may sometimes be
really difficult and costly to correct hence increasing the cost of the project,
extension of contract duration and extra payment claims by the contractor.
To know what the architect wants largely depends on the level of knowledge of
building construction and experience of the one using the specification to build
such as foremen, site agents and clerk of works for large construction projects.
(Willis & Willis, 1990)
2.3.2 To be able to express what the architect wants clearly
The architect must be able to express what he wants to be done in clear and simple
language which can be understood by both the site agent and the clerk of works so
as to build to realize the architect’s wishes since he will not be on site always to
inspect works being carried out and also for the quantity surveyor to prepare
appropriate bills of quantities in other to help the contractor’s estimator to price the
works accurately for tendering. (Willis &Willis, 1990)
To be able to express what the architect wants clearly, the architect being the head
of the design team must confer with the rest of the members of the building team
and explain the contents of the specification clearly and the scope of the project to
enable them to visualize the whole project even before works start.
11
2.4.0 REASONS WHY MOST SPECIFICATIONS FOR BUILIDNG WORKS
FAIL IN GHANA
2.4.1 Insufficient thought by the architect
Most specifications for building works in Ghana fail because of insufficient
thought by the architect who is the designer at times fail to think about the
problems his detailing, design and related specification may pose to the clerk of
works and the site agent during construction.
The architect as the designer most as times concentrates more on the aesthetics
than the construction difficulties the aesthetic part of the design may pose to the
other members of the building team such as interpretation of the specifications in
relation to his design.
2.4.2 Insufficient knowledge of building construction.
The success of any specification for building works in Ghana largely depends on
the professional experience and the level of knowledge in building construction of
both the employer’s clerk of works or the contractors site agent that is for large
projects and for smaller projects foremen who in most cases supervises works so as
to build to realize the architect’s designs in relation to his specifications.
On the other hand, if the above mentioned professionals do not have requisite
knowledge in building construction including the interpretation of drawings and
specifications and even understanding the clauses under the specifications will lead
to building defects while works are in progress which will lead to extension of the
contract duration and making good defect after practical completion of works.
2.4.3 The use of old and out dated specifications for new building works.
Due to the use of out-dated specification for new building works in Ghana in most
cases may not work with new works and there might be a lot of important details
which may be left out and hence pose financial problems for the employer since he
will be liable to extra payment to the contractor for carrying out additional works
which should have been stated in the specifications.
12
2.4.4 The incorporation of British standard codes as references.
One of the major reasons why the use of specifications fail for building works in
Ghana is the use of British standard codes for various work sections as references
for specifications and this is due to the fact that most site agents don’t even have
copies of such codes, also do not even understand the clauses in such codes and
also such clauses cannot be applied in our local construction environment hence
the resort to using their own discretion due to their experience in construction.
13
CHAPTER THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.0 Introduction
This chapter examines the methodology adopted in bringing out the study. It
discusses the sources of data, data analysis and presentation, sampling design and
technique.
3.1 Sources of Data
The data used in this study were made up of both primary and secondary data. The
primary data were obtained from the field. Questionnaires and structured
interviews were administered on some selected D2 & D3Contractors (Messrs
Fredof Co. Ltd, Amfrank Co.Ltd, 2 Royal Bros.Co. Ltd, Gambico Co.Ltd,
Samjopa Ent, Jamesbury Contruction Ent, Osewus Construction Ltd, Nakwatex
Construction Ltd, Atuoni Ltd, Wadas Building & Construction Works, Hallfast
Limited, K.O.A Construction Ltd, Charspong Const. Ltd, Frameg(GH) Ltd,
E.K.W Const.Works, M.A. Salifu &Sons Ltd, Fairfax Eng. Ltd, Kojina Ent,
Mumed Ltd, D.K.G Ltd) and Consultants from Architectural and Engineering
Services Limited (A.E.S.L) Kumasi.
Secondary data that were employed in the study were obtained from journals,
magazines, newspapers, textbooks and relevant websites on Specifications.
3.2 Data Presentation and Analysis
The study employed both quantitative and qualitative techniques to analyse the
data obtained from the field. Tables, charts and graphs were employed when and
where appropriate to analyse and present data.
14
3.3 Sampling Design and Technique
In all, a sample of fifty (50) was used for the study. Contractors and Consultants in
the Ashanti region constituted the sample frame for the study. Thirty (30) of the
sample size representing 60% were contractors while twenty (20) representing
40% were consultants.
The technique employed in the study was simple random/probability sampling
technique to select a total of fifty (50) contractors and consultants for the study.
The simple random/probability sampling postulates that each element or member
of the population has equal and the same chance of being selected in the sample.
With the simple random sampling all the elements or members in the population
are assumed to have the same characteristics.
15
CHAPTER FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
4.0 Introduction
This chapter is focused on the analysis of the data collected from the field. Tables,
figures and charts are employed to aid in the analysis. The analysis looks at the
respondents’ understanding of the term specification, items specification should be
prepared for, how specifications are normally prepared, essentials in designing
specification, how specifications are structured, among others
4.1 CONSULTANTS RESPONSE TO QUESTIONNAIRES
4.1.1 Understanding of Specification
The emphasis here was to seek the views of consultants as to how they understand
the term specification. To achieve this task, a sample of twenty (20) consultants
was selected. Of this 20, only 15 responded to the question. The results of the
respondents were as follows: two (2) representing 13.3% said that specification
means amplifying details in contract drawings, one (1) representing 6.7% said that
specification means detailing of work, one (1) also representing 6.7% responded
that specification means describing quality of materials and workmanship, five (5)
constituting 33.3% said that specification means amplifying details in contract
drawings and detailing of work whilst the remaining six (6) constituting 40.0%
said that specification means detailing of work and describing quality of materials
and workmanship.
The results of the respondents are summarised in Table 4.1 and Figure 4.1.
16
Table 4.1 Understanding of the term Specification
2 13.3 13.3 13.3
1 6.7 6.7 20.0
1 6.7 6.7 26.7
5 33.3 33.3 60.0
6 40.0 40.0 100.0
15 100.0 100.0
Amplifying details incontract drawingsDetailing of workDescribing quality ofmaterials andworkmanshipAmplifying details incontract matrls &Detailing of workDetailing of work &Describing quality ofmatrls and workmanTotal
ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent
CumulativePercent
Figure 4.1 Understanding of the term Specification
Detailing of work &
Amplifying details i
Describing quality o
Detailing of work
Amplifying details i
17
4.1.2 How Specifications should be structured
The task here was to seek consultants’ view on how specifications should be
structured. A total of 15 respondents were selected to perform this task. Out of the
15 respondents, two (2) representing 13.3% said that specification should be
structured based on the scope of work while thirteen (13) representing 86.7%
responded that specification should be structured base on elemental aspects. From
the above, it could be seen that specifications are structured based on elemental
aspects. This is shown in Table 4.2 and Figure 4.2.
Table 4.2 How specifications should be structured
2 13.3 13.3 13.3
13 86.7 86.7 100.0
15 100.0 100.0
Based on scope of workBased on elementalaspectsTotal
ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent
CumulativePercent
Figure 4.2 How specifications should be structured
Based on elemental a
Based on scope of wo
18
4.1.3 Items specifications should be prepared for
Here, the task is to identify the items for which specification should be prepared.
Out of the 15 consultants selected, two (2) representing 13.3 percent responded that
specification should be prepared for the quality of workmanship whiles thirteen
(13) representing 86.7% said that specification should be prepared for the quality
of materials.
Table 4.3 Items specifications should be prepared for
2 13.3 13.3 13.313 86.7 86.7 100.015 100.0 100.0
Quality of workmanshipQuality of materialsTotal
ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent
CumulativePercent
Figure 4.3 Items specifications should be prepared for
Quality of materials
Quality of workmansh
19
4.1.4 How Specifications are normally prepared
The goal here was to assess how specifications are prepared. To achieve this goal,
15 consultants were selected. Of this, 2 constituting 13.3% said that specifications
are prepared from typical specifications for a similar project that have been done, 2
also representing 13.3% responded that specifications are prepared based on the
actual constituents of the particular project,
Table 4.4 How specifications are normally prepared
8 53.3 53.3 53.3
3 20.0 20.0 73.3
4 26.7 26.7 100.0
15 100.0 100.0
From typicalspecifications for asimilar project that haveBased on the actualconstituents of theparticular projectFrom typical specif. for aproj & Based on theactual constTotal
ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent
CumulativePercent
Figure 4.4 How specifications are normally prepared
From typical specif.
Based on the actual
From typical specifi
20
4.1.5 Who should be responsible for preparing the schedule of specification?
In this section, the major aim was to be able to identify the expertise who are
responsible for preparing the schedule of specification. Of the 15 respondents
interviewed, 2 representing 13.3% chose architect, 1 representing 6.7% chose
quantity surveyor, 1 representing 6.7% chose structural engineer while 11
representing 73.3 chose architect and structural engineer.
This is shown in Table 4.5 and Figure 4.5.
Table 4.5 Who should be responsible for preparing the shedule of specifications?
2 13.3 13.3 13.31 6.7 6.7 20.01 6.7 6.7 26.7
11 73.3 73.3 100.0
15 100.0 100.0
ArchitectQuantity SurveyorStructural EngineerArchitect andStructural EngineerTotal
ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent
CumulativePercent
Figures 4.5 Who prepares shedule of specification
Architect and Struct
Structural Engineer
Quantity Surveyor
Architect
21
4.1.6 Satisfaction with the level of conformity to the specification by contractors
The task was to find out the extent to which contractors conform to the
specification. To achieve this goal, 15 contractors were selected. Of the 15, one
representing 6.7% said it was satisfactory, eight (8) representing 53.3% said that it
was average whiles six (6) representing 40.0% said that it was poor. This goes to
attest that contractors’ level of conformity to specification is very poor.
The result is summarized in Table 4.6 and Figure 4.6.
Table 4.6 Satisfaction with the level of conformity to the specifications by contractors
1 6.7 6.7 6.78 53.3 53.3 60.06 40.0 40.0 100.0
15 100.0 100.0
SatisfactoryAveragePoorTotal
ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent
CumulativePercent
Figure 4.6
Satisfaction with the level of conformity to the specifications by contr
Poor
Average
Satisfactory
22
4.1.7 Challenges faced in developing specification
This section places emphasis on the major challenges faced in developing
specifications. Out of the 15 respondents interviewed, 1 constituting 6.7% said
that availability of materials to be specified is the major challenge, 2 representing
13.3% said that cost implication of the specified materials is the major challenge,
1 representing 6.7% said that the quality of local workmanship is the major
challenge, 7 representing 46.7% said that availability of materials to be specifies
and cost implication of specified materials whilst 4 representing 26.7% said that
cost implication of the specific materials and the quality of local workmanship.
The results are shown in Table 4.7 and Figure 4.7.
Table 4.7 Challenges faced in developing specifications
1 6.7 6.7 6.7
2 13.3 13.3 20.0
1 6.7 6.7 26.7
7 46.7 46.7 73.3
4 26.7 26.7 100.0
15 100.0 100.0
Availability of matrls tobe specifiedCost implication of thespecified materialsThe quality of localworkmanshipAvail. of matrls to bespecif. & Costimplicatn of specif.Cost implicatn of thespec. matrls & Thequali of local w/spTotal
ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent
CumulativePercent
23
Figure 4.7 Challenges faced in developing specification
Cost implicatn of th
Avail. of matrls to
The quality of local
Cost implication of
Availability of matr
4.1.8 Difficulties faced in supervising works based on specification
The task was to identify the difficulties involved in supervising works based on
specifications. To achieve this task, structured questionnaires were administered on
15 consultants. Out of the 15, 2 representing 13.3% said that neglecting
specifications to reduce cost is the difficulty, 2 constituting 13.3% said that limited
expertise of contractors is the difficulty, 4 representing 26.7% said that contractors
do not fully understand specifications as well as limited expertise are the causes of
the difficulty whiles 7 representing 46.7% responded that contractors do not fully
understand specification and neglecting specifications to reduce cost is the
difficulty.
This shown in Table 4.8 and Figure 4.9 below.
24
Table 4.8 Difficulties faced in supervising works based on specifications
2 13.3 13.3 13.3
2 13.3 13.3 26.7
4 26.7 26.7 53.3
7 46.7 46.7 100.0
15 100.0 100.0
Neglecting specificationsto reduce costLimited expertise ofcontratorsContractors donot fullyunderstd specif. & LimitedexpertiseContractors donot fullyunderstd specifi. &Neglecting speciTotal
ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent
CumulativePercent
Fig. 8 Difficulties faced in supervising works based on specification
Contractors donot fu
Contractors donot fu
Limited expertise of
Neglecting specifica
4.1.9 Essentials in designing specifications
The task was to find out what specifications actually require. Of the 15 respondents
who responded to the question, 3 representing 20.0% said that expressing what the
architect wants clearly is the essential in designing specifications, 3 also
representing 20.0% said that sufficient thought on the design is the essential in
designing specifications and the remaining 9 representing 60.0% said that
25
expressing what the architect wants and sufficient thought on the design. Table 4.9
and Figure 4.9 indicate the results.
Table 4.9 Essentials in designing specifications
3 20.0 20.0 20.0
3 20.0 20.0 40.0
9 60.0 60.0 100.0
15 100.0 100.0
Expressing what thearchitect wants clearlySufficient thought onthe designExpressing what thearchitect wants &Suffici. thought on thTotal
ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent
CumulativePercent
Figure 4.9 Essentials in designing specifications
Expressing what the Sufficient thought o
Expressing what the
26
4.2 CONTRACTORS RESPONSE TO QUESTIONNAIRES
4.2.1 Understanding of Specification
In order to solicit the views of contractors on the meaning of the specification, a
total of thirty (30) contractors were randomly selected. Out of the 30, only twenty
(20) responded to the questions. The results are as follows: Of the twenty (20)
contractors, 4 constituting 20.0% responded that they understand specification to
mean amplifying details in contract drawings, 2 constituting 10.0% responded that
specification has to so with detailing of work, 1 representing 5.0% said that
speciation means describing the quality of materials and workmanship, 7
representing 35.0% said that specification means amplifying details in contract
drawings as well as detailing of work whiles the remaining 6 representing 30.0%
said that specification has to do with detailing of work and describing quality of
materials and workmanship. The results show that to some extent the respondents
have fair idea of what specification means.
The results are shown in Table 4.10 and Figure 4.10 below.
Table 4.10 Understanding of Specification
4 20.0 20.0 20.0
2 10.0 10.0 30.0
1 5.0 5.0 35.0
7 35.0 35.0 70.0
6 30.0 30.0 100.0
20 100.0 100.0
Amplifying details incontract drawingsDetailing of workDescribing quality ofmaterials andworkmanshipAmplifying details incontract matrls &Detailing of workDetailing of work &Describing quality ofmatrls and workmanTotal
ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent
CumulativePercent
27
Figure 4.10 Understanding of Specification
Detailing of work &
Amplifying details i
Describing quality o
Detailing of work
Amplifying details i
4.2.2 Adequacy of Specification
The task was to find out from contractors the extent to which the specifications
provided for their building works are adequate. Of the 20 respondents who
responded to the questions, 5 of them who represent 25.0% said the specifications
provided for their works were very adequate while 15 representing 75.0% said the
specifications were adequate. This is shown in Table 4.11 and Figure 4.11.
Table 4.11 Adequacy of specification
5 25.0 25.0 25.015 75.0 75.0 100.020 100.0 100.0
Very AdequateAdequateTotal
ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent
CumulativePercent
28
Figure 4.11 Adequacy of specification
Adequate
Very Adequate
4.2.3 When Specifications should be prepared
The emphasis here was to establish the actual time during which specifications
should be prepared. Of the twenty (20) contractors selected, 1 which constitutes
5.0% responded that specifications should be prepared before drawing are prepared,
14 which also represents 70.0% said that specifications should be prepared after
drawings are prepared whereas the remaining 5 representing 25.0% responded that
specifications should be prepared before preliminary estimates.
Table 4.12 When specifications should be prepared
1 5.0 5.0 5.0
14 70.0 70.0 75.0
5 25.0 25.0 100.0
20 100.0 100.0
Before drawingsare preparedAfter drawings arepreparedBefore preliminaryestimatesTotal
ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent
CumulativePercent
29
Figure 4.12 When specifications should be prepared
Before preliminary e
After drawings are p
Before drawings are
4.2.4 Who should prepare the schedule of Specifications
In this section, the major aim was to be able to identify the expertise who are
responsible for preparing the schedule of specification. Of the 20 respondents
selected randomly, 3 representing 15.0% responded that it should architect, 2
representing 10.0% also responded that it should be quantity surveyor, 3 also
representing 15.0% responded that it should be structural engineer while 12
representing 60.0% said that it should be done by both the architect and the
structural engineer. The results are shown in Table 4.13 and Figure 4.13 below.
Table 4.13 Who should be responsible for preparing the shedule of specifications?
3 15.0 15.0 15.02 10.0 10.0 25.03 15.0 15.0 40.0
12 60.0 60.0 100.0
20 100.0 100.0
ArchitectQuantity SurveyorStructural EngineerArchitect andStructural EngineerTotal
ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent
CumulativePercent
30
Figure 4.13 Who should prepare the schedule of specifications
Architect and StructStructural Engineer
Quantity Surveyor
Architect
In addition to the above, most of the respondents suggested the inclusion of
electrician services in the preparation of the schedule of specifications.
4.2.5 Specifications are a necessary part of a contract document
The essence of this section is to find out whether it is necessary at all to include
specifications as part of a contract documents. The response from the respondents
indicates that specifications are a necessary part of a contract document. This is
because almost all the 20 respondents who responded to the question said Yes. The
results are shown in Table 4.14 and Figure 4.14 below.
Table 4.14 Specifications are a necessary part of contract documents
20 100.0 100.0 100.0YesValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent
CumulativePercent
31
Figure 4.14 Specifications are a necessary part of contract documents
Yes
4.2.6 Specifications normally have a bearing on the actual project
The emphasis here was to establish whether specifications do have bearing on the
actual project. It was established that specifications have bearing with the actual
project since all the 20 respondents answered yes. Table 4.15 and Figure 4.15
below indicate this.
Table 4.15 Specifications normally have a bearing on the actual project
20 100.0 100.0 100.0YesValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent
CumulativePercent
32
Figure 4.15 Specifications normally have a bearing on the actual project
Yes
4.2.7 Satisfaction with the kind of specification employed in contract documents
In this section, the task was to find out whether contractors are satisfied with the
kind of specification employed in contract documents. Almost all the respondents
said yes which means that they are satisfied with the kind of specification
employed in contract documents. Table 4.16 and Figure 4.16 show this.
Table 4.16 Satisfied with the kind of specifications present if employedin contract document
20 100.0 100.0 100.0YesValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent
CumulativePercent
33
Fig 4.16 Satisfied with the kind of specifications in contract documents
Yes
4.3 ANALYSIS
The study revealed that both Consultants and Contractors accepted that
specifications are meant to amplify details in the contract drawings, detailing of
work and describing quality of materials and workmanship.
Most Contractors and Consultants attested to the fact that specifications are
normally prepared by the Architect, Structural and Electrical engineers. However
most Consultants said specifications of new works are developed based on the
elemental aspects and also on specifications of old similar projects.
From the study it was also revealed that most contractors said specifications are a
necessary part of a contract document and they have a special bearing on the actual
project because specifications aid in bringing out the realization of the design and
also bring out a final quality construction product to give the client value for
money.
34
However most consultants said that most contractors do not fully understand
specifications, neglecting specifications to reduce cost. Hence leading to an average
and poor level of conformity to specifications.
It was also realized from the study that most contractors were satisfied with the
kind of specifications currently employed in contract documents and also said they
were adequate for the project they are handling and most of the contractors also
said ideally specifications should be designed after drawings have been prepared.
From the study it was revealed that the consultants mostly designed the
specifications essentially based on sufficient thought on the design and expressing
clearly what the architect wants and ideally specifications were prepared for quality
of building materials to be used for the project. However some of the challenges
faced by most consultants in developing specifications were the availability of
materials to be specified locally.
35
CHAPTER FIVE
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5.0 General From the above literature review and field study the following findings, conclusions and recommendations can be made 5.1 Summary of findings Ø Most contractors know what specifications are but did not really understand
them Ø Contractors knew that specifications have a special bearing on the actual
project and are a necessary part of the contract document Ø Most consultants designed specifications for new projects based on typical
specifications for similar projects that have already been done. Ø Specifications are rarely used by contractors to reflect the composition of
design. Ø Most consultants face the problem of the influx of new building materials and
new methods of construction that requires the development of new specifications.
5.2 Conclusion From the above findings I can be concluded that Contractors knew what specifications are but did not understand them and also Consultants mostly developed specifications based on past similar projects. 5.3 Recommendations Ø Consultants should try as much as possible to design new specifications for
new works since most at times old specifications for similar projects might not be compatible with the new one.
Ø Contractors should employ qualified building technicians to supervise projects
on their behalf to ensure specifications are really used to bring out a quality construction product.
Ø Consultants should design specifications in clear and simple language for
contractors to interpret simply.
36
REFERENCES
Ø Ivor H. Seely & Roger Winfield (1999), Building Quantities Explained,
Macmillan Building & Surveying Series. Ø Christopher J. Willis & J. Andrew Willis (1990), Specification Writing B.S.P
Professional Books. Ø D. Walton (1999), Building Construction Principles and Practices
Macmillan Texts for Industrial and Vocational & Technical Education Series.
37
APPENDIX I
KWAME NKRUMAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY,
KUMASI
COLLEGE OF ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING
FACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE AND BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Department of Building Technology
This is a questionnaire scheduled to assess the development and uses of
specifications for building works in Ghana.
I would be very grateful if you could provide answers to these questions. All
information given shall be used solely for academic purposes and will be treated
confidentially.
QUESTIONNAIRE FOR CONTRACTORS 1. Please indicate your understanding by the term specifications. Amplifying details in contract drawings Detailing of work Describing quality of materials and workmanship Others
(specify)……………………………………………………………………..
………………………………………………………………………
2. When should specifications be prepared?
Before drawings are prepared
After drawings are prepared
38
Before preliminary estimates
Others
(specify)……………………………………………………………………..
………………………………………………………………………
3. Do you think specifications are a necessary part of contract documents?
Yes
No
4. If yes, why?
……………………………………………………………………………...
………………………………………………………………………………
5. If no, why?
……………………………………………………………………………...
………………………………………………………………………………
6. Do specifications normally have a special bearing on the actual project?
Yes
No
7. If yes, why?
……………………………………………………………………………...
………………………………………………………………………………
8. If no, why?
……………………………………………………………………………...
………………………………………………………………………………
9. Are you satisfied with the kind of specifications present if employed in contract
documents?
39
Yes
No
10. If yes, why?
………………………………………………………………………….....
………………………………………………………………………………
11. If no, why?
…………………………………………………………………………......
………………………………………………………………………………
12. Who do you think should be responsible for preparing the schedule of
specifications?
Architect
Quantity Surveyor
Structural Engineer
13. How adequate are the specifications provided for building works you have been
contracted to build?
Very Adequate
Adequate
Not Adequate
40
APPENDIX II
KWAME NKRUMAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY,
KUMASI
COLLEGE OF ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING
FACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE AND BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Department of Building Technology
This is a questionnaire scheduled to assess the development and uses of
specifications for building works in Ghana.
I would be very grateful if you could provide answers to these questions. All
information given shall be used solely for academic purposes and will be treated
confidentially.
QUESTIONNAIRE FOR CONSULTANTS
1. What do you understand by the term specifications? Amplifying details in contract drawings Detailing of work Describing quality of materials and workmanship Others
(specify)……………………………………………………………………..
………………………………………………………………………
2. Who do you think should be responsible for preparing the schedule of
specifications?
Architect
Quantity Surveyor
Structural Engineer
41
Others
(specify)……………………………………………………………………..
………………………………………………………………………
3. What are some of the challenges in developing specifications?
Availability of materials to be specified locally
Cost implication of the specified materials
The quality of local workmanship
Others
(specify)……………………………………………………………………..
………………………………………………………………………
4. Ideally, what items should specifications be prepared for?
Quality of workmanship
Quality of materials
Others
(specify)……………………………………………………………………..
………………………………………………………………………………
5. How are specifications normally prepared?
From typical specifications for a similar project that have done
Based on the actual constituents of the particular project
Randomly
6. What are the essentials in designing specifications?
Expressing what the architect wants clearly
Sufficient thought on the design
Others
(specify)……………………………………………………………………..
………………………………………………………………………
42
7. How should specifications be structured?
Based on a Common Arrangement of work section
Based on scope of works
Based on elemental aspects
Others
(specify)……………………………………………………………………..
………………………………………………………………………
8. What are some of the difficulties you face in supervising works based on
specifications?
Contractors do not fully understand specification
Neglecting specifications to reduce cost
Limited expertise of contractors
Others
(specify)……………………………………………………………………..
………………………………………………………………………
9. Are you satisfied with the level of conformity to the specifications by the
contractors?
Very satisfactory
Satisfactory
Average
Poor
Others
(specify)……………………………………………………………………..
………………………………………………………………………