use of mannan- oligosaccharides (mos) as a feed additive
TRANSCRIPT
To cite this paper: Saeed M, Ahmad F, Asif Arain M, Abd El-Hack M-E, Emam M and Ahmed Bhutto Z (2017). Use of Mannan- Oligosaccharides (MOS) As a Feed Additive in
Poultry Nutrition. J. World Poult. Res., 7 (3): 94-103. 94
JWPR Journal of World’s
Poultry Research
2017, Scienceline Publication
J. World Poult. Res. 7(3): 94-103, Sept 25, 2017
Review, PII: S2322455X1700012-7
License: CC BY 4.0
Use of Mannan- Oligosaccharides (MOS) As a Feed Additive in
Poultry Nutrition
Muhammad Saeed1*, Fawwad Ahmad
2, Muhammad Asif Arain
1,3*, Mohamed E. Abd El-Hack
4, Mohamed Emam
5, Zohaib
Ahmed Bhutto3 and Arman Moshaveri
6
1Department of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Sciences and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China 2Department of Poultry Science, Institute of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan
3Faculty of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lasbela University of Agriculture, Water and Marine Sciences, 3800, Uthal, Balochistan, Pakistan
4Department of Poultry, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University, 44511, Zagazig, Egypt 5Department of Nutrition and Clinical Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Damanhour University, Damanhour, Egypt
6Department of Veterinary Medicine, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran *Corresponding author’s Email: [email protected]
Received: 09 Jul 2017
Accepted: 14 Aug 2017
ABSTRACT
The European Union banned using all prophylactic antibiotics as growth promoters in poultry nutrition. As a result,
the poultry nutritionist is now forced to look for growth promoting antibiotic alternatives, or at least considerably
demote the amount of antibiotics used to sustain efficient broiler meat production and to be able to produce safe
poultry egg and meat products. The Mannan-oligosaccharides (MOS), is a type of probiotics originated from the
yeast cell wall (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) has gained more prominent attention, mainly due to its ability to bind the
threadlike fimbriae on pathogenic bacteria preventing them from attaching to the gut wall, thereby averting their
stabilization and the resulting colonization and multiplication, up to the disease level, so it had been showed to be a
most capable solution for antibiotic-free diets, as well as furnishing effective support for digestion and immunity in
poultry. Several investigations confirmed that using MOS as a feed supplement in poultry diets allowed birds to
achieve a similar trend as when they were fed a diet enriched with antibiotic growth promoters. In addition, MOS has
also shown to have a positive affection on bodyweight gain, feed conversion ratio, egg weight, egg production,
fertility, and hatchability thus ameliorating well-being, energy levels and performance of avian species. Furthermore,
it is also thought that it plays a role as an antioxidant, helping with mineral retention, improving bone mineralization
and subsequently the overall improvement the performance of poultry birds. This review article has aimed to
illuminate its sources, mode of action and beneficial applications of MOS in poultry diet for improving, production,
immunity, safeguarding health among consumers and it ought to be used as a natural growth promoter on a
commercial level in order to replace synthetic antibiotics in the poultry industry.
Key words: Antioxidant, Feed additive, Gastrointestinal health, Mannan-oligosaccharides (MOS), Performance,
Poultry
INTRODUCTION
In the past decades, a variety of feed accretive had
been employed in poultry diet. These feed accretive led to
an improved rendition and effective utilization of feed in
poultry birds (Chand et al., 2016a; Shah et al., 2016; Xing
et al., 2017; Saeed et al., 2017a, b). Routinely being
utilized in accretive of feed as: emulsifiers, antimicrobials,
antioxidants, biological products, herbs, pH control agents
binders and enzymes as well (Vahdatpour and Babazadeh,
2016; Siyal et al., 2017; Tareen et al., 2017; Saeed et al.,
2017c, d, e).
Growth promoting is not the only use of feed
additives but they have used also for stabilizing the
95
beneficial gut microflora by forestalling beneficial
microorganisms (Hashemi and Dawoodi, 2011; Abudabos
et al., 2017). In the last decades, antibiotics that are used
as growth promoters in animal feed have been under
severe attention, since they pose a potential threat to
consumers by generating resistance in the host against the
bacteria (Sultan et al., 2015). Conclusively, the European
Union had banned the supplementation of growth
promoting antibiotics in the animal diet since 2006 (Khan
et al., 2016). Now, it is most important for the poultry
researcher to find alternatives to antibiotic growth
promoters to boost the health andproduction
performanceof poultry birds (Janardhana et al., 2009;
Babazadeh et al., 2011; Vahdatpour et al., 2011). Feed
additives of plant origin have gained a great interest in the
poultry industry as they are safer, with wide dose range
and so rare adverse effects (Alzawqari et al., 2016;
Abudabos et al., 2016). Recently, many experiments had
shown a number of significant effects on growth
parameters, immune response and gut health status in birds
fed diets contain phytogens (Tanweer et al., 2014; Saeed et
al., 2015; El-Hack et al., 2016, Saeed et al., 2017f, g , h).
These studies have shown that the small intestine with the
main role in the absorption of nutrients; it then proves that,
both the proper structure and the proper function of the
intestine is efficient in improving poultry performance and
health (Sultan et al., 2014). It has been suggested that
intestinal digestion and absorption of the nutrients is
higher if the surface area of the villi is increased (Chand et
al., 2016b). The beneficial microflora of young birds gut’s
are counted to be somewhat irregular and can easily be
disturbed by several external factors. The subclinical
infection is one of these external factors which posed by
the pathogenic challenge. So, the ability to preserve an
optimal or normal level of beneficial microflora in the gut
becomes one of the main factors in the determination of
the ultimate health status and consequently the genetic
growth expression of poultry. At commercial basis,
available mannan-oligosaccharide has exhibited to
enhance the bird growth parameters including feed intake
and feed utilization (Hooge, 2004a; Rosen, 2007a, b;
Nikpiran et al., 2013). The beneficial impacts of MOS on
the development gut microflora were also revealed by
Kocher et al. (2005) and Yang et al. (2008). The addition
of MOS constantly elevates the caecal beneficial
populations like Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus spp.
(Sadeghi et al., 2013). Decreasing the pathogenic bacteria
and the increasing the beneficial bacteria could be
belonged to the receptor sites competition and producing
volatile fatty acids by bacteriocins along with IgA
antibodies by the host immune system (Kim et al., 2009).
Owing to these changes in the beneficial microflora, the
goblet cells number and intestinal villi length increase as
well, which ultimately promotes functions and health of
the host GIT (Bonos et al., 2010). The diet supplemented
with MOS has been reported to have a positive effect
regarding body weight, feed efficiency, egg yield, fertility,
egg mass and egg hatchability in various poultry species
(Guclu, 2011; El-Samee et al., 2012). In another study by
Iqbal et al. (2017) who had fed birds with MOS that had
significant effects on body and egg mass, egg weight,
and egg number and it has shown that feeding MOS as a
substitute for antibiotics, as growth enhancer, can
positively impact productive traits as well as health
aspects in breeders of quail. This can also improve the
manifest utilization of energy in feed and improvethe birds
feed efficiency that could partially belong to the
modulatory impacts of mannan-oligosaccharide on the
GIT microflorain broilers (Yang et al., 2008). The current
review article discusses the potential aspects of using
MOS; including its sources, mode of action and beneficial
applications of MOS and its practical uses in the nutrition
and production of poultry industry for improving,
production, immunity and safeguarding health, among
consumers and to prioritize this natural growth promoter
as opposed to synthetic antibiotics to cope the medicinal
cost in poultry.
Chemical traits and source of mannan-
oligosaccharides
Mannan-oligosaccharides originated from the
mannose blocks that exist in the yeast cell wall as it is
mostly non-digestible carbohydrates (Saccharomyces
cerevisiaeis). The cell wall consists of up to 25–30% of
cell dry weight. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae is known
yeast in the brewery and bakery industries. The MOS
product which is a derivative of the yeast is used in animal
nutrition. Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall involves
both α-glucans and mannan-proteins. The essential
building block for yeast cell wall are polymers of mannan
with α (1-2) and α (1-6) bonds and to a less extent α (1-3)
bounded side chains (Kogan and Kocher, 2007). The host
enzymes or the intestinal bacteria enzymes cannot break
these bonds apart and as a result carbohydrates (MOS)
have no direct nutritive value, but it has benefits in
keeping the gut health. It can be theorized from the several
scientific research work that although mannan as a
derivate from yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) is
attributed to production and processing technologies, it
might have different chemical formation and biological
efficiency as reported by Spring (1999).
96
Mode of action
The beneficial microbiota development and the
sustainment of eubiosis act an important role in the
mechanisms of defense in the body and health of gut as
well. There is elevating evidence confirming that the
composition of microflora in the gastro intestinal tract in
an adult healthy host remains statistically stable as
theorized by Williams et al. (2001). Results of current
studies suggesting that the supplementation of MOS to
poultry diets can minimize the count of hind gut
pathogenic bacteria during the high exposure to the
pathogen (White et al., 2002; Castillo et al., 2008). The
MOS supplementation was indeed accompanied with
increasing beneficial flora, especially lactobacilli (Rekiel
et al., 2007). Another experiment has also confirmed the
beneficial impact of MOS, however, it has been also found
to decline animal gut concentration of ammonia
(Juskiewicz et al., 2003). Literature documented data
indicated that dietary MOS fed diets can greatly lower the
number of pathogens. In some studies on poultry, proves
found that if the dietis supplemented with MOS a
considerable positive effect on gut histological structure in
broilers chicken (Iji et al., 2001a). Similarly, it is reported
that dietary supplementation of mannan products had the
effect of increases the ratio of villous height/crypt depth in
young broilers (Iji et al., 2001a; Yan et al., 2008) and in
turkeys as well (Ferket, 2002) (Figure 1). Nochta et al.
(2010) found that the addition of mannan as feed
supplement remarkably enhanced the nutrients apparent
digestibility.
Figure 1. How do Mannan-Oligosaccharides (MOS) affect intestinal structure (MOS could prevent the colonization and
attachment of pathogenic bacteria and thus reduce the adverse effects of microflora and metabolites)
Beneficial effects of mannan-oligosccharides in
poultry
Broiler Farming
Effect on growth performance and blood
biochemistry. Mannan-oligosaccharide that is one of the
best alternatives to antibiotic growth advancers in the
poultry industry diets and which are originated from yeast
outer cell wall that known as Saccharomyces cerevisiae
(Esecel et al 2012). The use of MOS in broiler diets had
shown to positively impacts on performance criteria
(Rosen, 2007a; Fritts and Waldroup, 2003). The range of
dietary inclusion of the MOS averaged from 0.5 to 5 g /kg
diet. The dose-response of MOS in different research work
had showed the best dosage of MOS for optimal growth is
around 2 g /kg diet as reported by Tucker et al. (2003). Iji
et al. (2001b) studied the influences of different doses of
MOS (0, 1, 3 and 5 g /kg diet) on the structure and
function of the intestine of poultry birds within the starter
97
period (21-day). Results proved that poultry birds gave a
high response by increasing the addition of MOS from 1 to
21 d compared to the 21-42 d period (Tucker et al., 2003).
Nikpiran et al. (2014) reported that adding the MOS to the
diets of poultry improved the growth performance values
by enhancing the feed intake and stimulating the growth
hormone and insulin release.
In a study had reported a significant decrease in the
total cholesterol concentration in broiler chickens which
had been supplemented with MOS @ 0.05% when
compared to a control diet (Juskiewicz et al., 2003). Also,
another experiment had shown that MOS could promote
caecal Lactobacillus spp. and Bifidobacterium spp. growth
and also elevated the height of villus and the number of
goblet cells in poultry jejunum and ileum (Mohsen et al.,
2014).
Effect on immune response. It is found that MOS
had proved to be much more effective on antibody
production against Avian Influenza Virus (AIV) in broiler
chickens than Humate (HU). The immune function could
be augmented with dietary Humate and MOS
supplementation (Tohid et al., 2010). The innate immune
system recognizes key molecular formations of the
invading bacteria involving peptidoglycans,
lipopolysaccharides, and possibly the structures of
mannose in the cell walls of yeasts. Oligosaccharides
which have mannose have been reported to impact on
immune system through activating mannose-binding
protein secretion from the liver. The aforementioned
protein, as a result can enchain to bacteria and trigger the
complement cascade of the immune system of the host as
described by Newman (1994). MOS was indicated of
having a beneficial effect on both immunoglobulin status
and humoral immunity in general. Savage (1996)
described an increase in IgG of the plasma and bile IgA in
poultry grown up on diets supplemented with 0.11%
MOS. The diet fed with MOS may constitute a novel and
most effective plausible alternative that could reduce the
spread of disease by decreasing the virus shedding and the
contamination of the environment from AIV (H9N2)
infection in poultry birds (Akhtar et al., 2016). Both
Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its derived product is
known as MOS that supplementation in poultry feed has a
clear effect on the attenuation of Escherichia coli (E. coli)
which induces intestinal cells disruption by reducing the
intestinal inflammation and barrier dysfunction in broilers
chicken. In addition to that, yeast (Saccharomyces
cerevisiae) addition could also improved the intestinal
microbiota and feed efficiency of in avian species (Wang
et al., 2016) and MOS could improve the absorption of
trace minerals (Sohail et al., 2011).
Layer farming
The feed supplementation with MOS has shown to
entail positive effects by improving (P < 0.01) the liver
antioxidant status and mitigating the significant increase in
the cecal pathogenic bacterial load after molt in layer birds
which shows the benefits of which can be improved
with MOS supplementation (Bozkurt et al., 2016). The
prebiotic (mannan-oligosaccharide) supplementation can
positively alter the intestinal microenvironment (Hutsko et
al., 2016). In another study by Jahanian and Ashnagar
(2015) found that MOS supplementation to laying hens
feed under bacterial infection could improve their
productive performance probably through modification in
the gut’s bacterial populations and improving nutrient
digestibility. As described by Bozkurt et al. (2012) who
had shown that egg production had efficiently improved
by MOS also showed that a stimulating humeral immune
response in laying hens in different climate conditions.
Turkey farming
After the broiler production industry, the turkey
industry considered as the second source of poultry meat
across the globe. In turkeys, 76 numbers of comparisons
showed the same responses to MOS as in broilers (Hooge,
2004b; Rosen, 2007b). Hooge (2004b) claimed that MOS
addition to turkey rations revealed an average increase in
body weight by2% and reductionmortality by about25%.
So, organic enteric conditioners, such as dietary
MOS, are of great importance for the turkey farming
industry. Recently, antibiotic resistance had been raised in
the Escherichia coli exist in the field which had been
isolated from commercial turkey farms in North Carolina.
In addition to that, a resistance to the Enrofloxacin had
been showed (Bernick et al., 1999). There is no specific
proof that that growth promoting doses of antibiotics
control disease (Gustafson and Bowen, 1997), the debate
over the Gram-negative bacteria that had been showing
some resistance, as shown by Salmonella and E. coli,
which caused the strongest objection to the use of
antibiotic as growth promoters (Scioli et al., 1983). MOS
improves the performance of turkey poults, especially
during the E. coli challenge like antibiotics which were
traditionally used (Ferket et al., 2002). An improvement in
growth performance was also observed in turkeys fed diets
enriched with MOS (Savage and Zakrzewska, 1996) also
authors found a statistical increase in body weight gain in
large white male poults which fed a diet supplemented
with 0.11% MOS. Cetin et al. (2005) reported that MOS
98
enhanced immunoglobulin levels and caused more
positive effects on growth performance, production and
the turkeys' ability to resist diseases. As a result of the
previous finding, it can be concluded that MOS is an
interesting alternative to antibiotic growth promoters to
improve performance in turkey (Parks et al., 2001) and
also it has a clear effect on improving body weight gain
and lowering mortality in poults (Hooge 2004a).
An alternative to antibiotic
In contrast, regarding the action mode of the
chemical growth promoters (antibiotics) fermentable
carbohydrates sources, oligosaccharides especially MOS,
act as one of the best alternatives to the Gram-negative
pathogens attachment sites, so they prevent the attachment
to the enterocytes and subsequently prevents the enteric
infection. The adherence step of the pathogenic microbe
to the intestinal cell wall is known to be the prerequisite
step to the infection (Gibbons and Houte, 1975). This can
be more clarified as in Vibrio cholera which is incapable
of starting their disease signs without the attachment step
to the enterocyte, even with large numbers of bacteria
present (Freter, 1969). The adhesion step causes the
bacterial entrapment and colonizing. The entrapment of
nutrients for growth, the concentration of the digestive
enzymes and the toxins onto intestinal cell wall, and the
possible prevention of antibody attachment to the
pathogenic cell (Costerton et al., 1978). The cell wall of
the yeast organism is mostly carbohydrates and proteins in
the form of mannose, glucose, and N-acetylglucosamine
that are branched and chained together (Ballou, 1970).
Mannan-oligosaccharides that are derived from mannans
on yeast cell surfaces are acting effective binder to the
bacterial binding sites (Ofek et al., 1977). Pathogens that
are mannose-specific Type-1 fimbriae are confused and
adsorbed to the MOS, leaving the enterocytes without
colonization. In the study of Newman (1994), that had
shown that the presence of dietary mannan-
oligosaccharides in the intestine had successfully
discarded some pathogenic bacteria that had the possibility
of attachment to the lumen of the intestine. Mannose was
shown by (Oyofo et al., 1989a) to inhibit the in vitro
attachment of Salmonella Typhimurium to intestinal cells
of the day old broilers chicken. A study by (Oyofo et al.,
1989b) had shown that dietary mannose had a successful
effect on inhibiting Salmonella Typhimurium in intestinal
colonization in broilers. (Spring et al., 2000) had shown an
effort in screening different bacterial strains to examine
their ability to agglutinate mannan-oligosaccharides in
yeast cell preparations (Saccharomyces cerevisiae, NCYC
1026). Which showed that the inclusion of MOS in the
diet can improve the poultry birds' performance, especially
during challenging with E. coli, as well as being used as
growth promoter antibiotics in poultry industry? A
comparison of some attributes with dietary mannan-
oligosaccharides and antibiotics is shown in table 1,
(Ferket et al., 2002).
Table 1. Comparison of some attributes with dietary
mannan-oligosaccharides and antibiotics.
Antibiotics Mannan-oligosaccharides
It reduces the non-specific
immunological protection in the
mucosa as a result of reducing
both beneficial and non-
beneficial bacteria (i.e.
lactobacilli)
It can increases non-specific
mucosal immunological
protection by increasing
relatively the goblet cell
numbers and consequently
the mucus secretion and it
increases the colonization of
beneficial bacteria in the gut.
It improves AME and reduces
the energy needed for
maintenance which
consequently improves the net
energy availability
It improves net energy
available for production by
improving dietary AME
It improves growth
performance parameters under
various environmental
conditions
Improves growth
performance parameters
mainly when challenged
with enteric pathogens
By suppressing enteric
microflora it suppresses the
competition for the nutrients.
It improves the brush border
health so it enhances the
absorption process.
prolonged or Improper usage
can produce antibiotic resistant
pathogens
It will not produce bacterial
resistance
Reduces immunological stress
via lowering enteric microbial
load
It's important role to
stimulate gut-associated
system immunity by acting
as a non-pathogenic
microbial antigen
Decreases adverse effects of
microflora metabolites by
decreasing the microflora
Decreases the adverse effects
of microflora metabolites by
changing microflora profile
It inhibits both the viability and
proliferation of some pathogens
and beneficial enteric
microflora
It acts as a barrier against the
attachment and consequent
colonization of some enteric
bacteria, but it is not
bactericidal.
99
Figure 2. A flow diagram illustrating a large surface area is vital for optimal digestive function and nutrient absorption in
poultry birds.
CONCLUSION
After reviewing the compiled literature it can be fully
clarified that MOSs can be considered as a potential
alternative to antibiotic growth promoters, and even at
trace amounts @ 0.1%-0.4% practically usage as
commercial feed additive in poultry nutrition would be
quite effective in improving the health status and
production performance of poultry. Among consumer
concerns about danger increasing of antibiotic-resistant
pathogens has urged the poultry nutritionist to consider
“biologically safer” alternatives After studying the
published literature it is clear now that MOS is considered
one of the best alternatives to antibiotic growth promoters.
These mannan-oligosaccharides are non-digestible
carbohydrates that may have greater benefits than
antibiotics if it is used in a synergic way with other non-
pharmaceutical enteric conditioners, such as fructo-
oligosaccharides, probiotics, bioactive peptides, and some
herbs and it would, in this manner, be a helpful additive to
reduce feed cost in the poultry industry.
Acknowledgements
All the authors of the manuscript thank and
acknowledge their respective Universities and Institutes.
Competing interests
Authors declared that they have no conflict of
interest.
Author`s contributions
All the authors significantly contributed to compile
and revise this manuscript. MS, MAA, reviewed the
literature and initiated the review compilation. MEAEH,
ZAB and ME, critically revise the manuscript. FA and
MEAEH check the English language accuracy. Finally all
authors read and approve the manuscript for publication.
REFERENCES
Abudabos AM, Alyemni AH, Dafalla YM and Khan RU
(2016). The effect of phytogenic feed additives to
substitute in-feed antibiotics on growth traits and
blood biochemical parameters in broiler chicks
challenged with Salmonella Typhimurium.
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23:
24151-24157. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-016-7665-2
Abudabos AM, Alyemni AH, Dafalla YM and Khan RU
(2017). Effect of organic acid blend and Bacillus
subtilis alone or in combination on growth traits,
blood biochemical and antioxidant status in broilers
exposed to Salmonella Typhimurium challenge
during the starter phase. Journal of Applied Animal
Research, 45: 538-542.
DOI:10.1080/09712119.2016.1219665
Akhtar T, Ara G, Ali N, Ud DMF and Imran KM (2016).
Effects of dietary supplementation of mannan-
oligosaccharide on virus shedding in avian influenza
(H9N2) challenged broilers. Iranian Journal of
Veterinary Research, 17: 268-272.
DOI:10.22099/IJVR.2016.3914
100
Alzawqari M, Al-Baddany A, Al-Baadani H, Alhidary I,
Khan RU, Aqil G and Abdurab A (2016). Effect of
feeding dried sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) peel and
lemon grass (Cymbopogon citratus) leaves on growth
performance, carcass traits, serum metabolites and
antioxidant status in broiler during the finisher phase.
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23:
17077-17082.
Babazadeh D, Vahdatpour T, Nikpiran H, Jafargholipour
MA and Vahdatpour S (2011). Effects of probiotic,
prebiotic and synbiotic intake on blood enzymes and
performance of Japanese quails (Coturnix japonica).
Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 81: 870-874.
Ballou CE, (1970). A study of the immunochemistry of
three yeast mannans. Journal of Biological Chemistry
245: 1197-1203.
Bernick J (1999). Resisting Resistance. Dairy Today,
Farm Journal, Inc. Philadelphia, PA, Mar Fairchild,
A.S., J.L.
Bonos E, Christaki E and Paneri P (2010). Performance
and carcass characteristics of Japanese quail as
affected by sex or mannan-oligosaccharides and
calcium propionate. South African Journal of
Animal Science, 40: 173-184.
Bozkurt M BintaS E K rkan S Aksit H Kucuky lmaz K
and Erbas G Cabuk M Aksit D Par n U and Ege G
(2016). Comparative evaluation of dietary
supplementation with mannan-oligosaccharide and
oregano essential oil in forced molted and fully fed
laying hens between 82 and 106 weeks of
age. Poultry Science, 95: 2576-2591.DOI:
10.3382/ps/pew140
Bozkurt M, Kucukyilmaz K, Catli AU, Cinar M, Bintas E
and Coven F (2012). Performance, egg quality, and
immune response of laying hens fed diets
supplemented with mannan-oligosaccharide or an
essential oil mixture under moderate and hot
environmental conditions. Poultry Science, 91: 1379-
1386. DOI: 10.3382/ps.2011-02023
Castillo M, Martin-Orue S, Taylor-Pickard J, Perez J and
Gasa J (2008). Use of mannan-oligosaccharides and
zinc chelate as growth promoters and diarrhea
preventative in weaning pigs: Effects on microbiota
and gut function. Journal of animal science, 86: 94-
101. DOI: 10.2527/JAS.2005-686
Cetin N, Guçlu BK and Cetin E (2005). The Effects of
Probiotic and Mannan-oligosaccharide on some
Haematological and Immunological Parameters in
Turkeys. Transboundary & Emerging Diseases, 52:
263-267. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0442.2005.00736.x
Chand N, Faheem H, Khan RU, Qureshi MS, Alhidary IA
and Abudabos AM (2016b). Anticoccidial effect of
mananoligosacharide against experimentally induced
coccidiosis in broiler. Environmental Science and
Pollution Research, 23: 14414-14421.
Chand N, Muhammad S, Khan RU, Alhidary IA and
Rehman ZU (2016a). Ameliorative effect of synthetic
γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) on performance traits,
antioxidant status and immune response in
broiler exposed to cyclic heat stress. Environmental
Science and Pollution Research, 23: 23930-23935.
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-016-7604-2
Costerton JW, Geesey GG and Cheng KJ (1978). How
bacteria stick. Scientific American 238: 86-95.
El-Hack MEA, Alagawany M, Farag MR, Tiwari R,
Karthik K, Dhama K, Zorriehzahra J and Adel M
(2016). Beneficial impacts of thymol essential oil on
health and production of animals, fish and poultry: a
review. Journal of Essential Oil Research, 28: 365-
382. DOI: 10.1080/10412905.2016.1153002
El-Samee LDA, El-Wardany I, Ali NG and Abo-El-Azab
O (2012). Egg quality, fertility and hatchability of
laying quails fed diets supplemented with organic
zinc, chromium yeast or mannan-oligosaccharides.
International Journal of Poultry Science, 11: 221-
224. DOI: 10.3923/IJPS.2012.221.224
Esecel H Dem E Deg menc glu and B g C M
(2012). The effects of bio-mos® mannan-
oligosaccharide and antibiotic growth promoter
performance of broilers. Journal of Animal and
Veterinary Advances, 9: 392-395.
DOI:10.3923/javaa.2010.392.395
Ferket PR (2002). Use of oligosaccharides and gut
modifiers as replacements for dietary antibiotics. In
Proceedings of 63rd Minnesota Nutrition
Conference, Eagan, MN, USA, 17–18 September
2002; pp. 169-182.
Ferket PR, Parks CW and Grimes JL (2002). Benefits of
dietary antibiotic and mannan-oligosaccharide
supplementation for poultry. Multi-State Poultry
Meeting. May 14-16.
Freter R (1969). Studies of the mechanism of action of
intestinal antibody in experimental cholerae. Texas
reports on biology and medicine, 27:299-316.
Fritts C and Waldroup P (2003). Evaluation of Bio-Mos
mannan-oligosaccharide as a replacement for growth
promoting antibiotics in diets for turkeys.
International Journal of Poultry Science, 2: 19-22.
DOI: 10.3923/IJPS.2003.19.22
Gibbons RJ and Houte JV (1975). Bacterial adherance in
oral microbial ecology. Annual Reviews in
Microbiol, 29: 19-42.
Guclu BK (2011). Effects of probiotic and prebiotic
(mannan-oligosaccharide) supplementation on
performance, egg quality and hatchability in quail
breeders. Ankara Üniversity Veteriner Fakültesi
Dergisi, 58: 27-32. DOI:
10.1501/vetfak_0000002445
101
Gustafson RH and Bowen RE (1997). Antibiotic use in
animal agriculture. Journal of Applied Microbiology,
83: 531-541.
Hashemi SR and Davoodi H (2011). Herbal plants and
their derivatives as growth and health promoters in
animal nutrition. Veterinary research
communications, 35: 169-180.DOI: 10.1007/S11259-
010-9458-2
Hooge DM (2004a). Meta-analysis of broiler chicken pen
trials evaluating dietary mannan-oligosaccharide
1993-2003. International Journal of Poultry Science
3:163-174. DOI: 10.3923/ijps.2004.163.174
Hooge DM (2004b). "Turkey pen trials with dietary
mannan-oligosaccharide: meta-analysis, 1993-
2003." International Journal of Poultry Science, 3:
179-188. DOI: 10.3923/ijps.2004.179.188
Hutsko SL, Meizlisch K, Wick M and Lilburn MS (2016).
Early intestinal development and mucin transcription
in the young poult with probiotic and mannan
oligosaccharide prebiotic supplementation. Poultry
Science, 95: 1173-1178. DOI: 10.3382/ps/pew019
Iji PA, Saki AA and Tivey DR (2001a). Intestinal structure
and function of broiler chickens on diets
supplemented with a mannan oligosaccharide.
Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,
81: 1186–1192. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.925
Iji PA, Saki AA and Tivey DR (2001b). Intestinal
structure and function of broiler chickens on diets
supplemented with a mannan oligosaccharide.
Journal of Science Food and Agriculture, 81: 1186-
1192. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.925
Iqbal M, Hussain A, Roohi N, Arshad M and Khan O
(2017). Effects of mannan oligosaccharides
supplemented diets on production performance of
four close-bred flocks of Japanese quail
breeders. South African Journal of Animal Science,
47: 290-297. DOI: 10.4314/sajas.v47i3.5
Jahanian R and Ashnagar M (2015). Effect of dietary
supplementation of mannan oligosaccharides on
performance, blood metabolites, ileal nutrient
digestibility, and gut microflora in Escherichia coli-
challenged laying hens. Poultry Science, 94: 2165-
2172. DOI: 10.3382/ps/pev180
Janardhana V, Broadway MM, Bruce MP, Lowenthal JW,
Geier MS, Hughes RJ and Bean AG (2009).
Prebiotics modulate immune responses in the gut-
associated lymphoid tissue of chickens. The Journal
of nutrition, 139: 1404-1409. DOI: 10.3945/
jn.109.105007
Juskiewicz J, Zdunczyk Z and Jankowski J (2003). Effect
of adding mannan oligosaccharide to the diet on
the performance, weight of digestive tract segments,
and caecal digesta parameters in young turkeys.
Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences, 12: 133-142.
DOI: 10.22358/jafs/67690/2003
Khan RU, Naz S, Dhama K, Karthik K, Tiwari R,
Abdelrahman MM, Alhidary IA and Zahoor A
(2016). Direct-fed microbial: beneficial applications,
modes of action and prospects as a safe tool for
enhancing ruminant production and safeguarding
health. International Journal of Pharmacology, 12:
220-231. DOI: 10.3923/ijp.2016.220.231
Kim C, Shin K, Woo K and Paik I (2009). Effect of
dietary oligosaccharides on the performance,
intestinal microflora and serum immunoglobulin
contents in laying hens. Korean Journal of
Poultry Science, 36: 125-131. DOI:
10.5536/KJPS.2009.36.2.125
Kocher A, Denev S, Dinev I, Nikiforov I and
Scheidemann C, (2005). Effects of mannan
oligosaccharides on composition of the cecal
microflora and performance of broiler
chickens, Proc. 4 BOKU-Symp. Tierernähr.,
Tierernähr. ohne antibiotische
Leistingsförderer. Univ. Bodenkunde Wien.,
Vienna, Austria, pp. 216-220.
Kogan G and Kocher A (2007). Role of yeast cell wall
polysaccharides in pig nutrition and health
protection. Livestock Science, 109: 161-165. DOI:
10.1016/j.livsci.2007.01.134
Mohsen P, Zhengxin X, Bushansingh B, Eric C and Xin Z
(2014). Effects of mannan oligosaccharide and
virginiamycin on the cecal microbial community and
intestinal morphology of chickens raised under
suboptimal conditions. Canadian Journal of
Microbiology, 60: 255-266. DOI: 10.1139/cjm-2013-
0899
Newman K (1994). Mannan-oligosaccharides: Natural
polymers with significant impact on the
Gastrointestinal Microflora and the Immune System.
In: Lyons, T.P. and Jacques, K.A., Eds.,
Biotechnology in the Feed Industry. Proceeding of
Alltech’s Tenth Annual Symposium ottingham
University Press, Nottingham, 167-175.
Nikpiran H, Vahdatpour T, Babazadeh D and Vahdatpour
S (2013). Effects of saccharomyces cerevisiae thepax
and their combination on blood enzymes and
performance of Japanese quails (Coturnix
japonica) Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 23:
369-375.
Nikpiran H, Vahdatpour T, Babazadeh D, Tabatabaei SM
and Vahdatpour S (2014). Effects of functional
feed additives on growth influenced hormones and
performance of Japanese quails (Coturnix japonica).
Greener Journal of Biological Sciences, 4: 039-044.
Nochta I, Halas V, Tossenberger J and Babinszky L
(2010). Effect of different levels of mannan-
oligosaccharide supplementation on the apparent ileal
digestibility of nutrients, N-balance and growth
performance of weaned piglets. J. Anim. Physiol.
Anim. Nutr. 94:747–756.
102
Ofek I, Mirelman D and Sharon N (1977). Adherance of
Escherichia coli to human mucosal cells
oligosaccharide supplementation on the apparent ileal
digestibility of nutrients, N-balance and growth
performance of weaned piglets. Journal of Animal
Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 94: 747-756.
Oyofo BA, Droleskey RE, Norman JO, Mollenhauer HH,
Ziprin RL, Corrier DE and DeLoach JR (1989a).
Inhibition by mannose of in vitrocolonization of
chicken small intestine by Salmonella Typhimurium.
Poultry Science, 68: 1351-1356.
Oyofo BA, DeLoach JR, Corrier DE, Norman JO, Ziprin
RL and Molenhauer HH (1989b). Prevention of
Salmonella Typhimurium colonization of broilers
with D-mannose. Poultry Science, 68: 1357-1360.
Parks CW, Grimes JL, Ferket PR and Fairchild AS (2001).
The effect of mannan oligosaccharides,
bambermycins, and virginiamycin on performance of
large white male market turkeys. Poultry Science, 80:
718-723.
Rekiel A, Bielecki W, Gajewska J, Cichowicz M,
Kulisiewicz J, Batorska M, Roszkowski T and Beyga
K (2007). Effect of addition of feed antibiotic
flavomycin or prebiotic BIO-MOSS on production
results of fatteners, blood biochemical parameters,
morphometric indices of intestine and composition of
microflora. Arch. Tierz. Dummerstorf, 50: 172-180.
Rosen GD (2007a). Holo-analysis of the efficacy of Bio-
Mos® in broiler nutrition. British Poultry Science,
48: 21-26. DOI:10.1080/00071660601050755
Rosen GD (2007b). Holo-analysis of the efficacy of Bio-
Mos® in turkey nutrition. British Poultry Science,
48: 27-32. DOI:10.1080/00071660601050755
Sadeghi AA, Mohammdi A, Shawrang P and Aminafshar
M (2013). Immune responses to dietary inclusion of
prebioticbased mannan oligosaccharide and β-glucan
in broiler chicks challenged with Salmonella
Enteritidis. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal
Sciences, 37: 206-213. DOI: :10.3906/vet-1203-9
Saeed M, Baloch AR, Wang M, Soomro RN, Baloch AM,
Baloch AB. Arian MA, Faraz SS and Zakriya HM
(2015). Use of Cichorium Intybus Leaf extract as
growth promoter, hepatoprotectant and immune
modulent in broilers. Journal of Animal Production
Advances, 5: 585-591. DOI:
10.5455/japa.20150118041009
Saeed M, Babazadeh D, Naveed M, Arain MA, Hassan FU
and Chao S (2017a). Reconsidering betaine as a
natural anti-heat stress agent in poultry industry: a
review. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 1-
10.DOI: 10.1007/s11250-017-1355-z
Saeed M, Abd El-Hac ME, Alagawany M, Naveed M,
Arain MA, Arif M, Soomro RN, Kakar M, Manzoor
R, Tiwari R, Khandia R, Munjal A, Karthik K,
Dhama K, Iqbal HMN and Sun C (2017b).
Phytochemistry, Modes of Action and Beneficial
Health Applications of Green Tea (Camellia sinensis)
in Humans and Animals. International Journal of
Pharmacology, 13: 698-708. DOI: 10.1007/s11250-
017-1355-z
Saeed M, Abd El-Hac ME, Alagawany M, Arain MA. Arif
M, Mirza MA, Naveed M, Sarwar M, Sayab M,
Dhama K and Chao S (2017c). Chicory (Cichorium
intybus) Herb: Chemical Composition,
Pharmacology, Nutritional and Healthical
Applications. International Journal of Pharmacology,
13: 351-360. DOI: 10.1007/s11250-017-1355-z
Saeed M, Abd Elhack ME, Arif M, Elhindawy MM, Attia
AI, Mahrose KM, Bashir I, Siyal FA, Arain MA and
Fazlani SA (2017d) Impacts of distiller’s dried
grains with solubles as replacement of soybean meal
plus vitamin e supplementation on production, egg
quality and blood chemistry of laying hens. Annals of
Animal Science, 17: 849–862. DOI: 10.1007/s11250-
017-1355-z
Saeed M, Naveed M, Arain MA, Arif M, Abd El-Hack
ME, Alagawany M, Siyal FA, Soomro RN and Sun C
(2017e). Quercetin: Nutritional and beneficial effects
in poultry. World's Poultry Science Journa, l 73: 355-
364. DOI: 10.1007/s11250-017-1355-z
Saeed M, Arain MA, Arif M, Alagawany M, Abd El-Hack
ME, Kakar MU, Manzoor R, Erdenee S And Chao S
(2017f). Jatropha (Jatropha curcas) meal is an
alternative protein source in poultry nutrition.
World's Poultry Science Journal, (Accepted). DOI:
10.1007/s11250-017-1355-z
Saeed M, Babazadeh D, Arif M, Arain MA, Bhutto ZA,
Shar AH, Kakar MU, Manzoor R and Chao S
(2017g). Silymarin: a potent hepatoprotective agent
in poultry industry. World's Poultry Science Journal,
73: 483-492.DOI: 10.1007/s11250-017-1355-z
Saeed M, Yatao X, Rehman ZU, Arain MA, Soom RN,
Abd El-Hac, ME, Bhutto ZA, Abbasi B, Dhama K,
Sarwar M and Chao S (2017h). Nutritional and
Healthical Aspects of Yacon (Smallanthus
sonchifolius) for Human, Animals and Poultry.
International Journal of Pharmacology, 13: 361-369.
DOI: 10.1007/s11250-017-1355-z
Savage TF (1996). The effects of feeding a mannan
oligosaccharide on immunoglobulins, plasma IgG
and bile IgA, of Wrolstad MW male turkeys. Poultry
Science, 75:143-148.
Savage TF and Zakrzewska EI (1996). The performance of
male turkeys fed a starter diet containing a mannan
oligosaccharide (Bio-Mos) from day old to eight
weeks of age." Proceedings Alltech’s 12th Annual
Symposium on the Biotechnological Feed Industry.
Pp. 47-54.
Scioli C, Esposito S, Anzilotti G, Pavone A and Pennucci
C (1983). Transferable drug resistance in Escherichia
103
coli isolated from antibiotic-fed chickens. Poultry
Science, 62: 382-384. DOI: 10.3382/ps.0620382
Shah AA, Khan MS, Khan S, Ahmad N, Alhidary IA,
Khan RU and Shao T (2016). Effect of different
levels of alpha tocopherol on performance traits,
serum antioxidant enzymes, and trace elements in
Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) under
low ambient temperature. Revista Brasileira de
Zootecnia, 45: 622-626. DOI: 10.1590/S1806-
92902016001000007
Siyal FA, Babazadeh D, Wang C, Arain MA, Aysan T,
Zhang L, Wang T and Saeed (2017) Emulsifiers in
the poultry industry. World's Poultry Science Journal,
73(3): 611-620. DOI: 10.1017/S0043933917000502
Sohail MU, Rahman ZU, Ijaz A, Yousaf MS, Ashraf K
and Yaqub T, Zaneb H, Anwar H and Rehman H
(2011). Single or combined effects of mannan
oligosaccharides and probiotic supplements on the
total oxidants, total antioxidants, enzymatic
antioxidants, liver enzymes, and serum trace minerals
in cyclic heat-stressed broilers. Poultry Science, 90:
2573-2577. DOI: 10.3382/ps.2011-01502.
Spring P (1999). Mannan oligosaccharides as an
alternative to antibiotic use in Europe. Zootecnica
International, 22: 38-41.
Spring P, Wenk C, Dawson KA and Newman KE (2000).
The effects of dietary mannan oligosaccharides on
cecal parameters and the concentrations of enteric
bacteria in the ceca of Salmonella-challenged broiler
chicks. Poultry Science, 79: 205-211. DOI:
10.1093/ps/79.2.205
Sultan A, Ullah I, Khan S, Khan RU and Hassan Z (2014).
Impact of chlorine dioxide as water acidifying agent
on the performance, ileal microflora and intestinal
histology in quails. Archiv Tierzucht, 31: 1-9. DOI:
10.7482/0003-9438-57-031
Sultan A, Ullah T, Khan S and Khan RU (2015). Effect of
organic acid supplementation on the performance and
ileal microflora of broiler during finishing period.
Pakistan Journal of Zoology, 47: 635-639.
Tanweer AJ, Saddique U, Bailey C and Khan R (2014).
Antiparasitic effect of wild rue (Peganum
harmala L.) against experimentally induced
coccidiosis in broiler chicks. Parasitology Research,
113: 2951-2960. DOI: 10.1007/s00436-014-3957-y
Tareen MH, Wagan R, Siyal FA, Babazadeh D, Bhutto
ZA, Arain MA and Saeed M (2017). Effect of
various levels of date palm kernel on growth
performance of broilers. Veterinary World, 10: 227-
232. DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2017.227-232
Tohid T, Hasan G and Alireza T (2010). Efficacy of
mannan oligosaccharides and humate on immune
response to avian influenza (h9) disease vaccination
in broiler chickens. Veterinary Research
Communications, 34: 709-717. DOI:
10.1007/s11259-010-9444-8
Tucker L, Esteve-Garcia E and Connolly A (2003). Dose
response of commercial mannan oligosaccharides in
broiler chickens, WPSA 14th European Symposium
on Poultry Nutrition. Lillehammer, Norway.
Vahdatpour T and Babazadeh D (2016). The effects of
kefir rich in probiotic administration on serum
enzymes and performance in male Japanese quails.
The Journal of Animal and Plant Science, 26: 34-
39.
Vahdatpour T, Nikpiran H, Babazadeh D, Vahdatpour S
and Jafargholipour MA (2011). Effects of Protexin®,
Fermacto® and combination of them on blood
enzymes and performance of Japanese quails
(Coturnix Japonica). Annals of Biological Research,
2: 283-291.
Wang W, Li Z, Han Q, Guo Y, Zhang B and D'Inca R
(2016). Dietary live yeast and mannan
oligosaccharide supplementation attenuate intestinal
inflammation and barrier dysfunction induced by
Escherichia coli in broilers. British Journal of
Nutrition, 116: 1878-1888. DOI:
10.1017/S0007114516004116
White L, Newman M, Cromwell G and Lindemann M
(2002). Brewers dried yeast as a source of mannan
oligosaccharides for weanling pigs. Journal of
Animal Science, 80: 2619-2628.
Williams BA, Verstegen MW and Tamminga S (2001).
Fermentation in the large intestine of single-
stomached animals and its relationship to animal
health. Nutrition Research Reviews, 14: 207-228.
DOI: 10.1079/NRR200127.
Xing LC, Santhi D, Shar AG, Saeed M, Arain MA, Shar,
AH, Bhutto ZA, Kakar MU, Manzoor R, El-Hack
MEA, Alagawany M, Dhama K and ling MC (2017).
Psyllium Husk (Plantago ovata) as a Potent
Hypocholesterolemic Agent in Animal, Human and
Poultry. International Journal of Pharmacology,
13: 690-697. DOI: 10.3923/ijp.2017.690.697
Yan GL, Yuan JM, Guo YM, Wang Z and Liu D (2008).
Effect of saccharomyces cerevisiae mannan
oligosaccharides on intestinal microflora and
immunity in broilers. Journal of China Agricultural
University, 13: 85-90.
Yang Y, Iji P, Kocher A, Thomson E, Mikkelsen L and
Choct M (2008). Effects of mannanoligosaccharide
in broiler chicken diets on growth performance,
energy utilisation, nutrient digestibility and intestinal
microflora. British poultry science, 49: 186-194.
DOI:10.1080/00071660801998613