transportation committee

Sacramento Area Council of Governments

1415 L Street, Suite 300 Sacramento, CA 95814

tel: 916.321.9000 fax: 916.321.9551 tdd: 916.321.9550 www.sacog.org

Transportation Committee Thursday, May 2, 2013, at 10:00 a.m. Roll Call: Directors Cabaldon, Cohn, Crews (non-voting), Griego, Hesch, Hodges,

Holmes (alternate), Joiner, Ex-officio Member Jones, Krovoza, Peters, Slowey, Vice Chairs Hagen and Sander, and Chair Saylor

Public Communications: Any person wishing to address the committee on any item not on the agenda may do so at this time. After ten minutes of testimony, any additional testimony will be heard following the action items.

1. Minutes of the April 4, 2013, Meeting◄ (Mr. Carpenter) 2. Funding of Transit Projects Using Federal Transit Administration Section 5307 and

5339 FFY 2013 Apportionments to the Sacramento Urbanized Area◄ (Mr. Taylor) 3. Flexible Funds Programing Round Framework and Application Process◄

Ms. DeVere-Oki 4. Regional Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Trails Master Plan Update◄ (Ms. Cacciatore) 5. Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER) V Nomination

Process◄ (Ms. DeVere-Oki) 6. Fiscal Year 2013-14 Provisional Budget for the Capitol Valley Regional Service

Authority for Freeways and Expressways (CVRS)◄ (Mr. Heiman) 7. Call Box Maintenance Request for Proposals Release◄ (Mr. Heiman) 8. SACOG Toll Credits Policy◄ (Mr. Carpenter/Ms. Arnold) 9. Background Briefing on Blueprint and Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable

Communities Strategy 2035 (Mr. McKeever) 10. May Is Bike Month 2012 Recap and 2013 Campaign Update (Mr. Tendick) 11. Transportation Committee Planning Calendar Update (Mr. Carpenter) 12. Other Matters 13. Adjournment

◄ Indicates Action Prepared by: Approved by: Mike McKeever Don Saylor Chief Executive Officer Chair Next committee meeting: Thursday, June 6, 2013 The Meridian Plaza Building is accessible to the disabled. If requested, this agenda, and documents in the agenda packet can be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and the Federal Rules and Regulations adopted in implementation thereof. Persons seeking an alternative format should contact SACOG for further information. In addition, a person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, in order to participate in a public meeting should contact SACOG by phone at 916-321-9000, e-mail ([email protected]) or in person as soon as possible and preferably at least 24 hours prior to the meeting.

Parking is available at 15th and K Streets

Item #13-5-1 T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i t t e e Ac t i o n

April 25, 2013 Minutes of the April 4, 2013, Meeting Issue: The Transportation Committee met April 4, 2013. Recommendation: Approve the minutes of the meetings as submitted. Discussion: The minutes of the April 4, 2013, meeting are attached for approval by the Transportation Committee. Approved by: Mike McKeever Chief Executive Officer Key Staff: Matt Carpenter, Director of Transportation Services, (916) 340-6276 MM:MC:gg Attachment

SACRAMENTO AREA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE

DRAFT ACTION MINUTES

The SACOG Transportation Committee met on April 4, 2013, in the Rivers Rooms on the Third Floor of the Meridian Plaza Building, located at 1415 L Street, Sacramento, CA, at 10:00 a.m. CALL TO ORDER: Chair Saylor called the meeting to order at 10:00 a.m. ROLL CALL: Present: Directors Budge, Cabaldon, Griego, Hagen, Hodges, Joiner,

Krovoza, Peters, Slowey, Chair Saylor and Ex-officio Member Jones

Absent: Directors Cohn, Crews (non-voting), Duran, and Hesch 1. Minutes of the February 7 and March 7, 2013, Meetings

Upon motion by Director Cabaldon, second by Director Hagen, and unanimously carried, the Transportation Committee approved the minutes as submitted. Directors Greigo, Joiner and Slowey were absent for this vote.

2. Public Hearing: Draft Amendment #8 to the 2013/16 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (MTIP), Draft Amendment #2 to the Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (MTP/SCS) 2035, and Draft Air Quality Conformity Analysis

Chair Saylor opened the public hearing. There were no comments. Chair Saylor closed the public hearing. Upon motion by Director Budge, seconded by Director Hagen, and unanimously carried, the Transportation Committee recommended that the Board approve Draft Amendment #8 to the MTIP, Draft Amendment #2 to the MTP/SCS, and the accompanying Air Quality Conformity Analysis. Directors Greigo, Joiner and Slowey were absent for this vote.

3. Programming Recommendations for Federal Transit Administration Section 5310 [Elderly and Disabled Transportation] Capital Grants

Upon motion by Director Budge, seconded by Director Cabaldon, and unanimously carried, the Transportation Committee recommended that the Board approve the Section 5310 Regional Evaluation Committee’s project scores; certify that all five applicants meet Section 5310 requirements and conditions and have been reviewed in the region’s public participation process; and certify, by resolution, that the recommended projects are consistent with SACOG’s adopted Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy and will be included in the Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program if funded by the State. Directors Greigo, Joiner and Slowey were absent for this vote.

Transportation Committee Minutes April 4, 2013

Page 2

4. Request to Change Scopes for County of Sacramento Community Design Projects

Upon motion by Director Hagen, seconded by Director Griego, and unanimously carried, the Transportation Committee recommended that the Board approve Sacramento County’s request for scope changes to two projects and SACOG’s concurrence with the California Transportation Commission’s (CTC) approval for State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) amendments for the projects. Directors Joiner and Slowey were absent for this vote.

5. Adoption of New Sacramento Emergency Clean Air Transportation Guidelines

Upon motion by Director Cabaldon, seconded by Director Budge, and unanimously carried, the Transportation Committee recommended that the Board adopt the new 2013 SECAT Program guidelines, to begin implementation on May 1, 2013, with the clarification that any delegated authority is for administrative purposes only and does not include policy issues such as cost effectiveness or modifications to the selection process. The Committee requested annual updates on the results of this program, beginning in October 2013. The Committee also suggested that the new guidelines be shared with other air districts. Mark Loutzenhiser and Michael Neuenburg of the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District spoke on this item.

6. Transportation Committee Charge

Upon motion by Director Joiner, seconded by Director Slowey, and unanimously carried, the Transportation Committee recommended that the Board adopt the charge for the Transportation Committee.

7. Transportation Committee Planning Calendar Update

The Committee received and reviewed this item, presented by Matt Carpenter, SACOG staff.

8. Update on Use of Delegated Authority to Approve Amendments to the Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program This was a receive & file item; no presentation was made.

9. Public Participation Plan Amendment

The Committee received and reviewed this item, presented by Monica Hernández, SACOG staff.

Transportation Committee Minutes April 4, 2013

Page 3

10. Other Matters

Director Krovoza requested an update on the upcoming Cap-to-Cap trip. Matt Carpenter, SACOG staff, introduced two new SACOG employees.

11. Adjournment

Chair Saylor adjourned the meeting at 11:05 a.m.

Item #13-5-2 Transportat ion Committee Act ion

April 25, 2013 Funding of Transit Projects Using Federal Transit Administration Section 5307 and 5339 FFY 2013 Apportionments to the Sacramento Urbanized Area Issue: Should Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Funds be approved for transit projects? Recommendation: That the Transportation Committee recommend that the Board allocate the FFY 2013 FTA Section 5307 and 5339 apportionment of $24,376,082 for the Sacramento Urbanized Area to the transit projects identified in Attachment A and authorize the Chief Executive Officer to execute and submit grant funding applications for the SACOG sponsored projects. Discussion: SACOG has a Memorandum of Understanding with each of the transit operators in the Sacramento Urbanized Area to coordinate the planning and programming of FTA funds. In this role, SACOG facilitates the allocation of the FTA formula funds to transit projects through a collaborative process with the Transit Coordinating Committee (TCC). At their April 24th meeting, the TCC endorsed by consensus the transit projects and funding allocations as shown in Attachment A. To make transit funding available, SACOG staff works closely with transit operators and assists with their grant submittals to FTA. SACOG is responsible to FTA for ensuring projects in the grant applications are based on planning documents (e.g., MTIP and Short Range Transit Plans). SACOG is also required to submit a Letter of Concurrence with each grant application for the SACOG region. With Board approval, the FTA Section 5307 and 5339 apportionments for the Sacramento Urbanized Area will be incorporated by an administrative modification or amendment into the Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (MTIP). Approved by: Mike McKeever Chief Executive Officer MM:GT:gg Attachment Key Staff: Matt Carpenter, Director of Transportation Services, (916) 340-6276 Gary Taylor, Senior Planner, (916) 340-6279 1300407

El Dorado County TransitPreventive Maintenance $308,000

Subtotal $308,000

Elk Grove TransitBus Purchase $762,000

Subtotal $762,000

Folsom Stage LinesBus Purchase $455,000

Subtotal $455,000

Placer County TransitOperating Assistance $523,000

Subtotal $523,000

Lincoln TransitOperating Assistance $150,000

Subtotal $150,000

Roseville TransitBus Purchase $50,746Operating Assistance $511,000

Subtotal $561,746

Sacramento Regional TransitPreventive Maintenance $17,125,151Bus Purchase $480,000ADA Operations $1,995,543Utility Bldgs - ROW Improvements $180,000Rancho Cordova Soundwalls - Landscaping $96,642

Subtotal $19,877,336

Paratransit, Inc.CTSA $125,000

Subtotal $125,000

SACOGProgram Administration $80,000

Subtotal $80,000

Yolo County Transportation DistrictPreventive Maintenance $1,165,000ADA Operations $231,000Bus Purchase $138,000

Subtotal $1,534,000

Programming TotalsTotal $24,376,082

Attachment ASacramento Urbanized Area FY 2013 FTA Section 5307 & 5339 Funds

TCC Project and Funding Recommendation

Item #13-5-3

Transportat ion Committee Action

April 25, 2013 Flexible Funds Programming Round Policy Framework and Application Issue: Should the SACOG Board approve a policy framework for the biennial programming round and release a call for projects? Recommendation: That Transportation Committee recommend that the Board (1) approve the updated policy frameworks for the Bicycle & Pedestrian, Community Design, and Regional/Local Programs; and (2) release the 2013-14 Flexible Funding Round call for projects for the Bicycle & Pedestrian, Community Design, and Regional/Local programs. Discussion: SACOG releases a call for projects on a biennial basis, providing local agencies within the four- county region (Sacramento, Sutter, Yolo, and Yuba counties) the opportunity to apply for flexible funds that can go towards road, transit, bicycle, or pedestrian projects. The process runs for multiple months, beginning with the policy framework in May and culminating in the final programming recommendations by the end of the year. While there is still considerable uncertainty concerning the amount of funds available for programming, Board direction in May on the 2013-14 Funding Program policy framework will allow more time for the preparation of applications and the selection process. Staff anticipates returning to the Transportation Committee in August with the draft funding targets for the programming round, once the updated state and federal revenues amounts are available. Attachment A identifies key milestones in the process. The flexible funds for programming are derived from state and federal sources and leveraged by available local resources to both pair and focus federal dollars. The funding round is one of SACOG’s means for funding and advancing projects that contribute to the implementation the Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Community Strategy (MTP/SCS) through targeted investments in the region’s transportation system and a well-developed program funding structure. SACOG has five regional funding programs: Air Quality, Bicycle & Pedestrian, Community Design, Regional/Local, and Transportation Demand Management. These calls for projects relate only to Bicycle & Pedestrian, Community Design, and Regional/Local Funding programs, as the other two programs are managed under separate processes. These three Funding Programs have unique and long-standing identified purposes. The Bicycle & Pedestrian Program is intended to support the efforts of local agencies to construct infrastructure with walking, bicycling, and transit use as primary transportation considerations, and to provide facilities for walking and biking within and between the communities of the Sacramento region. The Community Design Program seeks to promote the implementation of the Blueprint principles by the construction of improvements in the public right-of-way. The emphasis of the Regional/Local Program is to promote projects that provide regional benefits and that develop and maintain the regional transportation network. As part of the initiation of each biennial funding round, SACOG staff assesses the prior round’s program-level policies, outcomes, and processes. Staff conducts this effort in order to determine ways to refine, streamline, and provide additional transparency within each of the individual programs. This includes updating policy frameworks and applications based on feedback from participants, local agencies, and

participating staff. For this 2013 funding round, SACOG staff has updated the individual policy frameworks, and continues to work and refine the application documentation process in preparation for an anticipated release of call for projects by the SACOG Board of Directors on May 16, 2013. Below are the unique modifications to these three programs, with more information provided in Attachments B, C, and D. Proposed modifications reflect input received from applicants in the prior funding round and staff analysis. The Bicycle & Pedestrian Funding Program: The policy framework and selection process remain fundamentally the same as prior funding rounds. This round will place emphasis on the short-term funding priorities approved by the Board in December 2012 and utilizes a more streamlined and informative application and guideline structure. The one notable change is in the selection process, with additional points going to project proponents that demonstrate quantitative benefits from their project. This additional step strengthens the performance-based funding connection in the Master Plan, MTP/SCS, and MAP-21. The Community Design Program: The policy framework and selection process remain fundamentally the same as prior funding rounds. This round will place an emphasis on funding more preliminary engineering and design projects and streamlining overall application requirements. The Regional/Local Program: The policy framework and selection process remain fundamentally the same as prior funding rounds. This round will place a greater emphasis on early feedback within the application process regarding available data resources and project scoping. An additional performance outcome has been included to project evaluation, allowing applicants to document how their project supports “state of good repair” benefits that improve the efficiency of the existing transportation system. Consistent with the overall funding program, additional consideration will be given to sponsors who will work with SACOG to apply project delivery strategies that reduce the number of projects in the program that are federalized. Federalized transportation projects typically require more extensive administrative efforts than projects funded solely with local revenues. Approved by: Mike McKeever Chief Executive Officer MM:MC:RDO:gg Attachments Key Staff: Matt Carpenter, Director of Transportation Services, (916) 340-6276 Renée DeVere-Oki, Senior Planner, (916) 340-6219 Greg Chew, Senior Planner, (916) 340-6227 Lacey Symons-Holtzen, Associate Planner, (916) 340-6212

Attachment A

THE ROAD MAP OF MILESTONES FOR THE PROCESS:

Draft Schedule

(Final Dates to be Determined)

Description

May 2013 • Policy Framework

• Application Release

June 2013 • Workshop

July or August 2013 • Applications Due

October or November 2013 • Draft Recommendations

November or December 2013 • Final Recommendations

December 2013 • RTIP Submittal

of 3

2014 BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN FUNDING PROGRAMThe purpose of this funding program is to provide facilities for walking and biking in the cities and towns of the region and to provide connections between them. Also, the efficiency of the transportation system is a key component of achieving the goals set forth by the Blueprint Planning Process. In the preferred Blueprint Scenario, bicycling and walking are integral to the types of development patterns depicted in the Blueprint Preferred Scenario and are necessary for its successful implementation. Projects and programs funded through this program must support the implementation of the Blueprint Preferred Scenario and planning principles.

In order to help implement the MTP/SCS, SACOG invests in bicycle and pedestrian facilities through the bi-annual Bicycle and Pedestrian Funding Program, adopted by the SACOG Board of Directors in September 2003. The Funding Program is to encourage locally determined developments consistent with Blueprint principles and local circulation plans to be designed with walking, bicycling and transit use as primary transportation considerations, and to provide facilities for walking and biking within and between the communities of the Sacramento region.

GOALS AND PRIORITIES Capital Project Priorities

1. Increase access to transit services;

2. Increase access to schools;

3. Eliminate gaps in the existing bicycle/pedestrian network;

4. Remove physical barriers in the bicycle and pedestrian network;

5. Facility completion; and

6. Reduce Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT).

Non-capital Projects and Programs Goals

1. Encourage biking and walking through public information, education, and awareness;

2. Where needed, perform studies and develop plans that support the goals for capital facilities stated above; and

3. Increase the level of public agency staff expertise on bicycling and walking.

ELIGIBLE PROJECT TYPES The projects eligible for this funding program are derived from the Regional Bicycle, Pedestrian and Trails Master Plan (Master Plan) which has been amended every two years since its initial adoption in 2004. The Master Plan provides an expansive set of policies and projects for regional bicycle and pedestrian planning efforts, and was developed through a working group and approved by the Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee. Projects in the Master Plan that meet the adopted funding priorities (Capital Project Priorities) are encouraged to apply for this Funding Program.

Financial support for these programs will come primarily from federal funding sources expected to be available to the region. Federal funding requirements from the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) are applicable. Examples include multi-use paths, bicycle lanes and routes, sidewalks, shoulders, signals, crossings, and other infrastructure projects. For capital projects, federal funds may be used for construction, as well as preliminary engineering, which includes environmental work and design, as well as for right-of-way phases. Non-infrastructure projects include bike/ped planning, education, information and marketing efforts.

INELIGIBLE PROJECT TYPES Projects and programs that are not eligible include facilities that serve only a recreational, rather than a transportation function, projects in new developments that are considered “good practices” according to FHWA guidelines, bicycle and pedestrian facility maintenance,

Attachment B

of 3

long-term staff positions, transit operations (except for bus services for bicyclists), law enforcement, and bicycle racks for carpools, vanpools, or private vehicles.

PROJECT SELECTION PROCESS SACOG staff will conduct an Eligibility Review of the applications and screen them for eligibility. Applications will be removed from the competitive process if found ineligible for federal funds, lack of funding of the appropriate type, or other requirements identified in the program guidelines.

SACOG staff forwards the applications to the Bicycle and Pedestrian Working Group (see below for the composition of the Performance Review Committee).

The Working Group prioritizes and ranks the applications, according to its own process, but does not discard any applications. Working Group members will not vote or comment on applications from their own organizations. The Working Group and/or SACOG reserve the right to contact applicants during this project selection process for additional information. The Working Group makes its recommendations to SACOG staff. Members should represent diverse geography. A SACOG staff member will staff each meeting.

Working Group Membership

Expertise Recruited from Number Land Use Planners Planners’ Committee 1

Project Engineers

Regional Planning Partnership 2

Bicycle/ Pedestrian Planning

Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory Committee

4 (2 advocates, 2 planners/ engineers)

Air Quality Air Districts 1

TDM TDM Task Force 1

Transit Transit Coordinating Committee 1

Community Groups

Regional Community Based Organizations 1

Total 11

The application process will be specific to the Bicycle and Pedestrian program, although SACOG staff will present a recommendation for funding to the SACOG Board of Directors for all of the funding programs together.

SCREENING PROJECTS OUT To be selected for funding, a project or program must meet both of the following screening criteria:

1. It is included in the Master Plan as a planned project. Only under very special circumstances will an application be considered that is not listed in the Master Plan.

2. It must be ready for inclusion into the Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program, with project scope and cost. The project application may include the cost of preparing environmental documents. However, for large projects that will necessitate a full Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), the EIS can be funded separately from the design and construction of the project (which should seek funding in a later round of funding).

3. Project is eligible for appropriate funding sources (i.e. CMAQ, RSTP, STIP, TAP).

4. Project meets the minimum project size of $167,205 ($150,000 funding award + $17,205 local match)

a. The minimum project size for this funding program is $167,205 ($150,000 funding award + $17,205 local match). Public agencies applying for funding for smaller projects may want to consider combining projects to meet the $167,205 threshold, or consider a larger, multi-year program or project. The exceptions to this rule are funding for non-capital projects such as Bikeway Master Plans or other projects

of 3

that would qualify for Federal Transit Agency Enhancement funds.

EVALUATING PROJECT PERFORMANCE In addition to how projects address the program goals and priorities discussed above, below are considerations that will be used by the Working Group and SACOG staff to make funding recommendations to the Board.

Sponsor agency commitment 1. Project readiness to move forward on a timely

schedule (e.g., schedule, cost, work with conservation corps, risk to project, etc.);

2. Sponsor agency agrees to conduct evaluation of project utilizing bicycle and/or pedestrian counts (or equivalent measure);

3. Sponsor agency commitment to implement the project, as evident by non-SACOG source funding commitments and inclusion in local policy documents;

4. Sponsor agency consideration of working with California Conservation Corps on TAP eligible projects;

5. Sponsor agency’s historical performance in delivering federal aid projects (i.e. following federal rules, STIP guidelines, delivery timeliness, etc.);

6. Application follows content requirements;

7. The project is committed to increasing information available about quantifiable benefits of bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure and planning efforts, and project scope includes element to address increasing data collection (e.g. conducting bicycle and/or pedestrian counts both pre and post project implementation);

Project performance 8. Project creates new access for users.

9. Project utilizes designs that prioritize the safety of bicyclists, pedestrians, and motorists

(documentation of safety issues should be included, if applicable);

10. Project design is context-sensitive and appropriate for surrounding environment;

11. Project improves safety/security for bicyclists and pedestrians, and include documentation of safety issues (if applicable);

12. Project demonstrates cost effectiveness, which is achieved by minimizing projected capital and operating expenditures while offering strong performance benefits;

13. Projects are not serving primarily recreational trips or equestrians, and are not part of developer-funded basic good practices;

Project support 14. Projects improving access to and around schools

and/or transit demonstrate evidence of strong support by affected schools and/or transit agencies; and

15. Inter-community projects offer evidence of strong support by all local jurisdictions where the project is located, and include commitment to land use planning consistent with Blueprint principles.

of 2

2014 COMMUNITY DESIGN FUNDING PROGRAMThe overall purpose of the Community Design Program is to provide financial support for federal aid eligible capital projects that promote implementation of the Blueprint Project Principles.

The Community Design Program provides financial incentives to local governments in Sacramento, Sutter, Yolo and Yuba Counties that have specific development and transportation improvements that will help foster Blueprint-friendly communities. The financial incentives, which come in the form of grants through a competitive process, must be federal aid eligible and transportation-related projects that have some land use component.

GOALS AND PRIORITIES Projects must also conform to some of the seven Blueprint Principles (more detail on SACOG’s website: www.sacog.org/regionalfunding/betterways.pdf):

1. transportation choices;

2. housing diversity;

3. compact development;

4. mixed land uses;

5. use of existing assets;

6. natural resource protection; and

7. quality design.

ELIGIBLE PROJECT TYPES All projects must be federal aid eligible and will primarily lead to or include construction. Generally speaking, federal aid eligible projects are those that significantly contain transportation infrastructure in public right-of-ways. Activities or tasks within the project must be either categorized as “construction”, “environmental”, “design” or “right-of way”. Pure planning activities are generally not considered an eligible use for the Community Design Program (exception: planning is allowed in the non-competitive funding category). The

following are examples of projects that are generally considered federal aid eligible:

• Transportation infrastructure directly connected to a land development project, land use plan, or in an existing “Blueprint friendly” community

• Bicycle and pedestrian paths, tunnels, and bridges

• On-street bike lanes

• Pedestrian plazas in public right-of-ways

• Pedestrian street crossings

• Streetscaping such as median landscaping, street trees, lighting, and furniture

• Traffic calming (but not interfering with public transit, bicycling or walking)

• Transit buses and services that serve the site (operations limited to 3 years)

• Transit stop amenities such as shelters, restrooms, and benches

• Transit transfer centers

One critical distinction is that federal aid projects must be for project elements that are considered “over and above” those that are standard requirements if there is an associated development with the project. For instance, if a private development is going in, and the project seeks Community Design funds for street improvements, the improvements must go beyond the jurisdiction’s “standard” requirements for that associated development. The private developer may be required to put in sidewalks and crosswalks, but federal aid could pay for textured crosswalks, landscaped medians and other elements that enhance the pedestrian experience that are not standard conditions of approval.

Attachment C

http://www.sacog.org/regionalfunding/betterways.pdf

of 2

PROJECT SELECTION PROCESS SACOG will issue a call for applications when federal funding opportunities arise. Public agencies (cities, counties, and other public agencies) in Sacramento, Sutter, Yolo, and Yuba counties are the eligible applicants for these federal funds. Each time funds are made available, the call for applications will be made through SACOG’s newsletter, webpage, advisory committee meetings, and letters and emails to public works and planning departments, transportation agencies, transit agencies, transportation management associations, and other organizations. An application, timeline, and funding guidelines will be made available at that time.

The application process remains the same as in prior rounds, but the application requirements have been reduced. Generally, the applicant sends a pre-submittal letter, and then is permitted to submit the application. If selected by an evaluation committee, the applicant will meet with a team of SACOG and Caltrans staffs to ensure the scope of work, budget and timeline meet program requirements. The application requires fewer pages than in prior rounds.

SCREENING PROJECTS OUT Not all projects can be easily determined for eligibility. In all cases, SACOG and Caltrans District #3 Local Assistance staff will work directly with each applicant on eligibility. For each potential application, an applicant must submit a pre-application letter describing the project and SACOG/Caltrans will provide a written response addressing issues relating to eligibility.

Capacity to manage a federal-aid project In addition, all applicants must have a staff person who is trained in federal aid funding management. In most cases, the staff is found in the Public Works Departments.

For those sponsoring jurisdictions that do not have internal staff who can manage federal transportation funds, they will be required to team up with a local agency or hire a qualified consultant in this area. This is not something that can be learned without prior experience. The Caltrans District 3 Local Assistance staff makes the final determination on whether an individual

is adequately qualified in federal aid management. If that person is deemed not qualified and a suitable replacement cannot be found, Caltrans may advise SACOG to disqualify the application.

Requested project amounts fall into the following ranges: $300,000 to $4 million for conventional construction projects; $150,000 to $500,000 for conventional pre-construction (design, engineering, environmental or right-of-way activities) projects; $1.5 million to $4.0 million for construction of Complete Streets project; and $100,000 or less for non-competitive projects.

Required local match Projects in the competitive categories of the program (above $100,000 project requests) must provide a minimum of 11.47% match in non-federal funds, as is required in all federal aid funding projects. This means for every $100,000 of federal funds requested from the program, the applicant is required to match a minimum of $12,957. Or, put another way, for every $100,000 of total project costs (grant and match combined), the program will pay up to $88,530 for every $11,470 of match provided by the project sponsor. Projects in the non-competitive category (funding requests $100,000 or lower) has a 10% local match requirement.

EVALUATING PROJECT PERFORMANCE There are two general evaluation criteria used by the two review committees and SACOG staff to determine whether a project will be recommended for funding. The two review committees will consider the projects based on the two criteria stated below, including some questions they frequently have about a project, or specific information they seek.

• Criterion #1: How well does the proposed project promote the Blueprint Project Principles?

• Criterion #2: How realistic is this project to be implemented within the program timeline?

SACOG staff will use the recommendations from the review committees as well as these additional criteria to make their recommendation.

of 2

2014 REGIONAL/LOCAL FUNDING PROGRAMThe Regional/Local Program is SACOG's largest competitive program. The emphasis of the program is to fund projects that provide regional benefits; projects of varying size and type are eligible to apply. The program seeks to promote effective and efficient use of limited state and federal funding resources to both develop and maintain the regional transportation network. This is accomplished through the funding of capital projects, road rehabilitation projects, and the development of shelf ready projects.

GOALS AND PRIORITIES In September 2009, the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) Board of Directors approved five policy considerations for the Regional/Local Funding Program as part of the 2010 Funding Round. The 2014 Funding Round will continue to use these five policy considerations; text has been updated and refined to reflect necessary changes for 2014 implementation as related to changes in the federal transportation act and SACOG’s implementation of the MTP/SCS 2035.:

HONOR PRIOR FUNDING COMMITMENTS SACOG will continue to honor prior funding commitments made to other agencies and adopted transportation control measures identified in the air quality State Implementation Plan.

EMPHASIZE COST-EFFECTIVE PROGRAMMING DECISIONS The current constrained funding environment calls for placing an even greater emphasis on making the most cost-effective programming decisions. Projects will be expected to perform better with fewer funding resources, so the focus can be on more immediate needs (e.g., projects within the next 10 years of the MTP). The appropriate types of funding will be matched to the best projects for those fund types.

FIX IT FIRST, OR MAINTAIN FACILITIES IN A STATE OF GOOD REPAIR The current poor economic situation, as reflected in local and state transportation budgets, is significantly straining the ability of member agencies to operate and maintain existing facilities and services. The funding from this programming round will help support local agencies while also advancing longer-term policy objectives from the MTP. Road rehabilitation projects will be allowed to compete in the Regional/Local funding program for this round as long as they also include elements that support complete streets and corridor features appropriate to an urban, small community, or rural context.

FOCUS ON SMALL OR MEDIUM-SIZED CAPITAL PROJECTS The Regional/Local Funding Program is an important source of capital funding. As in past funding cycles, capital projects providing regional benefits have been awarded funds through the Regional/Local program. A challenge for this policy priority is the limited number of projects that can be funded if the programming revenue is severely constrained. For the federal and state funds that are available, the emphasis will be on small- and medium- sized projects.

SUPPORT PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PHASES FOR FUTURE FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES Funding from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) in 2009 and the Proposition 1B funding programs that are coming to an end demonstrate the need to have “shelf ready” capital projects that are deliverable and thereby ready to utilize funding from competitive programs likely to appear in the near future (e.g., reauthorization of the federal transportation bill, future proposition 1B rounds, etc.). A relatively small but strategically allocated portion of the total revenue may go to early project development efforts.

Attachment D

of 2

ELIGIBLE PROJECT TYPES The emphasis of the program is to fund projects that provide regional benefits; projects of varying size and type are eligible to apply such as capital projects, road rehabilitation projects, and the development of shelf ready projects.

PROJECT SELECTION PROCESS To help project sponsors complete the best applications possible, SACOG staff will provide feedback on a sponsor’s preliminary “snapshot” of project information prior to completing a full detailed application. SACOG staff will review all applications against screening criteria and project performance outcomes to select projects.

SCREENING PROJECTS OUT All of the following conditions must be met for a project to proceed in the programming process. Failure to meet each screening consideration will eliminate the project from further consideration.

1. The project must be currently listed in the MTP or a lump sum project category. Non-exempt projects must align with SACOG’s air quality conformity and greenhouse gas objectives.

2. The project must be scheduled to begin construction no later than FFY 2019 with preliminary engineering and environmental analysis scheduled within three years.

3. The project costs and schedule estimate for environmental, engineering, ROW and start- up construction must be believable, based on standards for similar projects.

4. The project sponsor must have a track record that demonstrates technical capacity and reliability for similar projects.

5. A request for construction funding must demonstrate that environmental, engineering and ROW will be ready by the time funds are requested and the financial ability for ongoing operations and maintenance.

6. The project must be consistent with complete streets requirements (as applicable; http://www.sacog.org/complete-streets/toolkit/START.html).

EVALUATING PROJECT PERFORMANCE The following are seven performance outcomes for the Regional/Local Funding Program.

1. A regional reduction in VMT per capita

2. A regional reduction in congested VMT per capita

3. An increase in multi-modal travel/alternative travel/choice of transportation options

4. Provide long-term economic benefit within the region, recognizing the importance of sustaining both the urban and rural economies

5. Improve goods movement, including farm-to-market travel, in and through the region

6. Significantly improve safety and security

7. Demonstrate “state of good repair” benefits that improve the efficiency of the existing transportation system

Other selection considerations: 1. Special consideration will be given to agencies

submitting a joint-proposal project; in other words, a project that can demonstrate multi-jurisdictional participation and benefits will receive some level of priority.

2. Special consideration will be given to agencies submitting a project for which the agency has already funded the initial phases with its own resources (i.e., environmental, design and/or right-of-way).

3. Special consideration will be given to projects that maximize the use of available federal and state funds.

http://www.sacog.org/complete-streets/toolkit/START.html

http://www.sacog.org/complete-streets/toolkit/START.html

Item #13-5-4 Transportat ion Committee Act ion April 25, 2013 Regional Bicycle, Pedestrian and Trails Master Plan Update Issue: Should the Board approve the Master Plan update? Recommendation: That the Transportation Committee recommend that the Board approve the Regional Bicycle, Pedestrian and Trails Master Plan update. Discussion: Staff has been working with local jurisdictions and advocacy organizations to update the Regional Bicycle, Pedestrian and Trails Master Plan (Master Plan) for 2013. The Master Plan has been updated every two years since its first adoption by the SACOG Board in 2004. The Master Plan serves as a foundation for projects that may apply for the Bicycle & Pedestrian Funding Program in the four-county region (Sacramento, Sutter, Yolo and Yuba counties). The upcoming Funding Program will focus on awarding funding to projects in the Master Plan that implement the Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (MTP/SCS), including projects that are regionally significant and those that demonstrate strong performance. Following the 2011 update, the Transportation Committee directed staff to develop regional-scale policies and priorities for the next Master Plan update that reflect policy maker guidance and that can be used to determine funding objectives. In 2012, SACOG staff worked with the Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory Committee (Bike/Ped Committee) to convene a working group focused on developing regional policies for the Master Plan and priorities for regional funding. These policies and priorities were approved by the Bike/Ped Committee in October 2012 and by the SACOG Board the following month. Following the Transportation Committee’s direction, SACOG staff has updated the Master Plan to focus on performance-based planning, develop forward-thinking policies and priorities, and use as a tool to implement the MTP/SCS. The 2013 Master Plan update also emphasizes new and relevant information, regional efforts, and local community projects and programs. The project list has been updated to contain all approved local bike/ped projects that may apply for regional funding, as well as maps of current and planned facilities. At the April 25 meeting of the Bike/Ped Committee, staff from local agencies and advocacy organizations provided positive feedback on the Master Plan update and agreed to complete a final review of the plan. Important comments from this review will be shared with the Transportation Committee at the May 3 meeting. Approved by: Mike McKeever Chief Executive Officer MM:LSH:gg Attachment Key Staff: Matt Carpenter, Director of Transportation Services, (916) 340-6276 Lacey Symons-Holtzen, Associate Planner, (916) 340-6212 Victoria S. Cacciatore, Planning Analyst, (916) 319-5184 1300202

Draft April 23, 2013

Regional Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Trails

MASTER PLAN

Sacramento area council of governmentS

PRojEcT STAff:

Lacey Symons-Holtzen

Active Transportation Team Leader

Victoria S. Cacciatore

Active Transportation Team Coordinator

Amy Martin

Transit Analyst

Maricela Salazar

Transportation Planning Intern

Sage Smith

Graphic Designer

Laura Bell

GIS

ExEcuTivE STAff:

Mike McKeever

Chief Executive Officer

Kirk Trost

Chief Operating Officer/

General Counsel

Matt Carpenter

Director of Tranportation Services

AckNowLEDgEMENT

With a special thank you to the work-

ing group participants who worked with

SACOG to develop regional policies and

priorities, and to the members of the

Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Advi-

sory Committee for their contributions,

review and approval of the Master Plan;

specifically the following staff:

Scott Aaron, PCTPA

Charlie Alexander, Fehr & Peers

Jerry Barton, EDCTC

Kevin Becker, City of Citrus Heights

Van Boeck, Yuba County

Dan Bolster, EDCTC

Jim Campbell, Yolo County

Traci Canfield, Sacramento Regional

Transit District

Carrie Carsell, Fehr & Peers

Rick Carter, City of Elk Grove

Davel Cassell, Photos

Ed Cox, City of Sacramento

Chris Dougherty, City of West Sacra-

mento

Mike Dour, City of Roseville

Matt Dulcich, University of California,

Davis

Travis Evans, City of Rancho Cordova

Andy Fisher, Placer County

Bill Forrest, City of Galt

Brian Fragiao, Town of Loomis

Eric Fredericks, Caltrans District 3

Caylen Garrie, SACOG

Abbey Harding, NNTMA

Neal Hays, Sutter County

Dan Hinrichs, City of Isleton

Carie Huff, City of Auburn

Bill Irving, Sacramento County

Alexis Kelso, WALKSacramento

“DK” Kemp, City of Davis

Casey Kempenaar, City of Citrus Heights

Dan Klinker, Sacramento County

Jim Konopka, City of Folsom

Dave Lamon, City of Marysville

Diana Langley, City of Yuba City

Sharon Lydon, City of Yuba City

Alan Mitchell, City of Colfax

Libby O’Sullivan, SACOG

Terry Preston, WALKSacramento

Erik Reitz, Yolo County Transportation

District

Chad Riding, Caltrans District 3

Maricela Salazar, City of Winters

Dane Schilling, City of Wheatland

Deborah Schrimmer, SACOG

Devra Selenis, Sacramento Regional

Transit District

David Takemoto-Weerts, University of

California, Davis

Satwant Takhar, City of Live Oak

Mark Thomas, City of Rancho Cordova

Laura Webster, City of Rocklin

Jeffrey Werner, City of Elk Grove

Steve White, Sacramento County

Katie Wurzel, City of Woodland

1415 L Street, Suite 300

Sacramento, CA 95814

tel 916.321.9000

tdd 916.321.9550

www.sacog.org

Master Plan Bicycle, Pedestrian, and trails 3

executive suMMary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

1 . tHe BacKGrOunD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

2 . PurPOse & neeD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9

3 . WHO are We? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

4 . HOW DiD We Get Here? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10linking land use and transportation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11Blueprint smart Growth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11revitalizing Downtowns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12Metropolitan transportation Plan/ sustainable communities strategy (MtP/scs) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .13

MTP/SCS Guiding Principles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14Transit Priority Areas (TPAs) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

rural urban connection strategy (rucs) . . . . . . . . . . .15

5 . WHere are We GOinG? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16regional vision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .16regional Goals, strategies, and actions . . . . . . . . . . . . .16

6 . OPPOrtunities anD cHallenGes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .26

7 . iMPleMentinG reGiOnal PriOrities . . . . . . . . . . . . . .28

8 . iMPOrtant FOcus areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .29coordinated efforts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .29

Community Involvement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29May is Bike Month . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30Safe Routes to School . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31SACOG support for Safe Routes to School . . . . . . . . 32

continued support & research . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .32Performance Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .33

Monitoring and Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33Multi-Modal Level of Service (MMLOS) . . . . . . . . . . . 34

Planning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .35Complete Streets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35Increased Access . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35Wayfinding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37

understanding impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .38Safety . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38Public Health . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39Economic Indicators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40New Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40

education . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .41Pedestrian Education . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41Bicyclist Education . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41Motorist Education . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42Professional Education . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42

transit connections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .43Current Transit Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44Bicycle Facilities at Light Rail Stations and Transit Connections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45Americans with Disabilities Act . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46Connect Card . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46

supporting infrastructure and Programs . . . . . . . . . . . .47Secure and Convenient Parking at Destinations . . . . 47Technology and Innovation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48

9 . PlanninG anD DesiGn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .49Pedestrian Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50Street and Intersection Crossings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50Sidewalks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51Principles for Pedestrian Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52Bicycle Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52Multi-Use Paths (Class I Bikeways) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53Bike Lanes (Class II Bikeways) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53Bike Routes (Class III Bikeways) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54Additional Facility Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54

aPPenDix a .1 BacKGrOunD anD suPPOrtinG inFOrMatiOn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57

aPPenDix a .2 inJury statistics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .62

aPPenDix B reGiOnal PrOJect list anD MaPs OF Bicycle netWOrK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .66

aPPenDix c lOcal Bicycle anD PeDestrian Plans . 67

aPPenDix D transit inFOrMatiOn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70

aPPenDix GlOssary OF terMs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74

contents


ExEcuTivE SuMMARyThe Sacramento region’s Regional Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Trails Master Plan (Master Plan) envisions a complete transportation system that supports healthy living and active communities where bicycling and walking are viable and popular travel choices in a comprehensive, safe, and convenient network. This is the Sacramento Area council of government’s (SAcog’s) fifth Master Plan since 2004, with updates in 2007, 2009, and 2011. Since 2004, SAcog has helped fund over 60 regionally significant bicycle and pedestrian projects for a total cost of over $100 million.

implementing the Region’s vision for Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel

This is the first Master Plan to be shaped by the goals and strategies found within the recently adopted Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (MTP/SCS). Over the next 22 years, the MTP/SCS proposes to invest $2.8 billion to bicycle and pe-destrian projects. The 2013 Master Plan now shows how these goals are connected to regional strategies (to be implemented by SACOG, local agencies, advocacy groups and other organizations) and specific action actions that SACOG can take to help implement the Master Plan.

focus Area investments Help overcome challenges and Leverage opportunities

The 2013 Master Plan update showcases six Focus Areas of SACOG activities that help implement strategies and actions described in the Master Plan, such as 1) coordinating efforts between various stake-holder groups and local agencies, 2) measuring the performance of bicycle and pedestrian system, 3) assisting with complete streets plan-ning, 4) understanding the impacts to safety, public health, and the economy, 5) promoting traveler safety through education, 6) promot-ing multi-modal trips through transit connections, and 7) supporting infrastructure and programs.

updated Regional Project List and Maps of the Bicycle Network

The Master Plan’s project inclusion process is a comprehensive list of planned projects throughout the region. To ensure that local jurisdic-tions are allowed to submit their priority bicycle and pedestrian proj-ects for consideration during SACOG funding rounds, local agencies updated projects and related maps for inclusion in the Master Plan project list during the spring of 2013.

Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian funding Program

While inclusion in the Master Plan is required for consideration in the biennial Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Funding Program (Funding Program), project inclusion does not guarantee funding. Each funding round, project sponsors request more funding than is available. The Funding Program guidelines describe how candidate projects will be evaluated based on criteria shaped by the Goals, Strategies, and Actions in the Master Plan. The short-term funding priorities identified in the Master Plan serve as performance objectives in the Funding Program. These performance objectives are designed to focus SACOG invest-ments on projects that implement the MTP/SCS—including regional-ly significant projects and those that demonstrate strong performance. Projects that are included in the Master Plan and demonstrate strong performance are eligible to apply for the Funding Program.

Master Plan Bicycle, Pedestrian, and trails

Sacramento Region

6

The Sacramento region’s Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Trails Master Plan envisions a complete transportation system that supports healthy living and active communities where bicycling and walking are viable and popular travel choices in a comprehensive, safe, and convenient network.

Ph

oT

o c

ou

rT

eSy

of

ciT

y o

f r

oSe

vil

le

creating opportunities to integrate bicycle and

pedestrian travel into daily routine .


1

The Sacramento region is comprised of six counties and 22 cities, at the heart of a con-fluence of two major rivers and four signifi-cant highways, encompassing 6,562 square miles of land, including hills, mountains, rivers, lakes, wetlands, agricultural land, and open space. About 2.3 million people live in this diverse region, home to urban, suburban, foothill, and rural communities. Our region offers many exciting opportunities, and these features create many comfortable and invit-ing neighborhoods, compelling entertain-ment and arts, agricultural lands that feed the world, and diverse, beautiful scenery and natural places. In order to focus the way our region grows, the SACOG Board of Direc-tors adopted the Blueprint project in 2004, directing the Sacramento region to take a new approach to addressing transportation, land use and air quality issues.

An integral aspect to implementing our vi-sion for the future includes investing in infrastructure and programs that encourage walking and biking as viable options for transportation, as identified in the Regional Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Trails Master Plan (Master Plan). In the current long-range re-gional transportation and land use plan, the Metropolitan Transportation Plan/ Sustain-able Communities Strategy (MTP/SCS), specific investments are identified based on framework provided in the Master Plan.

In order to help implement the MTP/SCS, SACOG invests in bicycle and pedestrian facilities through the bi-annual Bicycle and Pedestrian Funding Program, adopted by the SACOG Board of Directors in September

2003. The focus of both the Master Plan and the Funding Program is to provide facilities for walking and biking within and between the communities of the Sacramento region. The projects included in this plan are for-ward-thinking, locally and regionally signifi-cant projects that may require at least partial regional funding. This plan is not financially constrained, and it contains at least 25 years’ worth of high quality, high impact, and lo-cally or regionally significant projects.

The Master Plan represents the efforts of SACOG staff, the Regional Bicycle and Pe-destrian Advisory Committee, local public agencies, and advocacy groups in the Sac-ramento region. This partnership approach ensures that representatives from a variety of stakeholder groups with different areas of ex-pertise could provide input and guidance on the development of the plan.

The Master Plan integrates local planning documents to visualize a seamless regional bi-cycle and pedestrian system. By compiling the local plans to form one comprehensive plan, the regional network becomes apparent, il-lustrating the key connections and access be-tween communities that will exist when the plan is fulfilled. The projects included in this plan were submitted and ranked by local pub-lic agencies. In order to apply for the Funding Program, projects must be included in the Master Plan and meet the short term funding priorities identified in Chapter 5. The listed projects are identified in city and county bi-cycle and pedestrian master plans, as well as other visionary planning documents identi-fied by local agencies. The complete project

THE BAckgRouND

lists can be viewed in Appendix B. Some projects identified in the Master Plan are conceptual, and exact alignments may not be determined or may change based on further study.


Sacramento Region

8

Yuba County

Yolo County

El Dorado County

Sutter County

Sacramento County

Placer County

Galt

Citrus HeightsFolsomWoodland

Loomis

Auburn

Colfax

Wheatland

Lincoln

SacramentoRanchoCordova

Yuba City

Rocklin

Isleton

Winters

Elk Grove

Roseville

Davis

South Lake Tahoe

WestSacramento

Marysville

Placerville

Live Oak

Galt


Loomis

Auburn

Colfax

Wheatland

Lincoln


Yuba City

Rocklin

Isleton

Winters

Elk Grove

Roseville

Davis

South Lake Tahoe

WestSacramento

Marysville

Placerville

Live Oak

50

505 99

505

128

99

113

113

45

70

65

70

49

174

193

88

16

99

20

20

80

80

80

80

5

SACOG Planning AreaCity BoundariesCounty BoundariesRivers/Lakes

Sacramento MetropolitanPlanning Area

MILES

KILOMETERS

0 5 1010 15 20

0 5 10 15 20

CAL IFORN IA


2

Public interest in providing high-quality bi-cycling and walking facilities has increased over the last several years for a number of reasons. The rise in obesity and related health problems throughout the country has led to public health campaigns for active, healthier lifestyles. Climate change, rising energy costs, and other environmental impacts from auto-mobile travel have fueled the desire of resi-dents to have better non-motorized transpor-tation choices for commuting, errands, and other necessary trips. Additionally, a dip in economic growth in the region has renewed interest in bicycling and walking, as they are a low-cost means of transportation. These and other components coalesce into the need for enhanced bicycle and pedestrian infrastruc-ture, support facilities, and education to ac-commodate travellers of all ages and abilities.

The six-county Sacramento region is geo-graphically varied and home to a diverse pop-ulation. In order to capitalize on the assets of each community, it is desirable to provide travel corridors that consistently provide con-

Benefits of walking and Bicycling include:

• equitable access to community

resources;

• higher levels of individual health

and wellness;

• higher quality of life;

• improved air quality and fewer

greenhouse gasses;

• lower road infrastructure mainte-

nance costs;

• reduced traffic congestion and

exposure to crashes; and

• vibrant business districts and

more money invested in the local

economy.

PuRPoSE & NEED

nections within and between communities and jurisdictions. Historically, bicycle and pedestrian planning and policies have only been addressed at the local level. However, as the popularity of bicycling and walking increases rapidly, the need for a cohesive, re-gional approach is more apparent. The Mas-ter Plan represents an opportunity to share best practices and improve coordination and connectivity within and between communi-ties, and to learn how cities and counties are creating and improving facilities to foster an environment supportive of bicycle and pe-destrian transportation.

It is also important to note that the Sacra-mento region is focused on reducing air pollution as it is designated as nonattain-ment for multiple transportation-related pollutants, i.e. Particulate Matter (PM10), fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5), and ozone; and the Sacramento region is classified as “Maintenance” for Carbon Monoxide. Im-proving air quality is a significant benefit of reducing vehicle miles travelled. Increasing

the quantity and improving the quality of in-frastructure can encourage more trips by foot and by bike. Local surveys have found that people are willing to bicycle more frequently for utilitarian purposes when better bicycle facilities are provided.1 If more people shift to bicycling or walking for either their entire trip or for their trip to a transit station, the transportation system can serve more trips without increasing congestion or emissions of transportation-related pollutants.

1 Caltrans 2002 Bike to Work Day Survey Findings

the city of elk Grove’s trail system provides indepen-

dence, physical activity, and opportunities for maintaining

a healthy lifestyle to many residents .

Ph

oT

o c

ou

rT

eSy

of

ciT

y o

f e

lk G

ro

ve


Sacramento Region

10

3

4How DiD wE gET HERE?The region is growing and SACOG’s mission is to provide more and better options for current and future residents. With a current population of 2.3 million residents and ris-ing, SACOG’s work must allow the region to grow in a way that makes it possible for people to live and work in the same commu-nity, and maintain independence as they age. Providing current and future residents with high quality of life through inclusive, equi-table, and integrated transportation and land use planning that enables residents to thrive and live healthy lives will help accomplish these goals.

An increase in population usually means an increase in traffic and congestion. However, the Sacramento region has an ideal climate and terrain to facilitate both shorter and lon-ger bicycle and pedestrian trips. With strate-gic investments in the current transportation system, the growth in traffic congestion each household experiences can be curbed, creat-ing opportunities for residents of the region to spend less time in their cars, and protect air quality while improving quality of life.

wHo ARE wE? The Sacramento Area Council of Govern-

ments (SACOG) is an association of local

governments in the six-county Sacra-

mento region. Its members include the

counties of Sacramento, Sutter, Yolo, and

Yuba; the portions of El Dorado and Plac-

er counties outside of the Tahoe Basin;

as well as the 22 cities within that area.

also approves the distribution of afford-

able housing in the region and assists in

planning for transit, bicycle networks,

clean air, and airport land uses. Over the

past ten years, SACOG has undertaken

a major effort to link transportation and

land development more closely.

SACOG provides transportation plan-

ning for the region, conducts a biannual

programming round to allocate funds

to projects based on apportionments of

regional funds, and serves as a forum for

the study and resolution of regional is-

sues. In addition to preparing the region’s

long-range transportation plan, SACOG

Yuba County

Yolo County

El Dorado County

Sutter County

Sacramento County

Placer County

Galt


Loomis

Auburn

Colfax

Wheatland

Lincoln


Yuba City

Rocklin

Isleton

Winters

Elk Grove

Roseville

Davis

WestSacramento

Marysville

Placerville

Live Oak

Galt


Loomis

Auburn

Colfax

Wheatland

Lincoln


Yuba City

Rocklin

Isleton

Winters

Elk Grove

Roseville

Davis

WestSacramento

Marysville

Placerville

Live Oak

50

505 99

505

128

99

113

113

45

70

65

70

49

174

193

88

16

99

20

20

80

80

80

80

5

Areas of Existing DevelopmentAreas of Future DevelopmentGreen AreasAgriculture and Undeveloped LandsCity BoundariesCounty BoundariesRivers/Lakes

Blueprint Projected Development in 2050

MILES

KILOMETERS

0 5 1010 15 20

0 5 10 15 20

CAL IFORN IAMaster Plan implementationBy tying the transportation plan to the future land uses identified in the Preferred

Blueprint Growth Scenario, communities across the region give individuals more

transportation options. The Master Plan is one tool to implement the recently

adopted Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy

(MTP/SCS), a long-range plan for transportation in the region built on the re-

gion’s smart land use plan, Blueprint.


a Growing region

By 2035, this region will have:

871,000 More People

303,000 New Homes

$ $ $361,000 New Jobs

$35.2bTransportation Investment Budget

Linking Land use and TransportationBy linking land use and transportation plan-ning and bringing jobs, housing and retail closer together, computer traffic modeling reveals that strategic transportation invest-ments can significantly improve our travel, including increasing transit, walk, and bike trips; shortening our remaining car trips; and reducing the time spent in heavy traffic congestion. Drawing on community interests and the SACOG Board’s support, the MTP/SCS is the second plan to be significantly influenced by Blueprint growth principles. The land use patterns forming the founda-tion of the MTP/SCS are based on cities and counties’ land use policies and the estimated performance of the market, which is influ-enced by state and federal regulations as well as local policies and codes. Working together to integrate policies and codes helps facilitate exciting, new planning opportunities.

The integration of smart growth

practices into existing communities,

and connecting each community

through a regional multi-modal

transportation system not only

encourages the reduction of

greenhouse gases emitted by motor

vehicle use, but also enhances the

walkability and bikeability of these

regionally connected communities.

Ph

oT

o c

ou

rT

eSy

of

er

ic f

re

de

ric

kS

1. Transportation choices

Community design can help encourage peo-ple to walk, ride bicycles, ride the bus, ride light rail, take the train, or carpool. Streets can be designed to include dedicated bike lanes or special lanes for bus rapid transit. The more people walk, bicycle, or ride tran-sit, the less they need to drive alone in their cars. Less driving alone means less congestion and less air pollution.

2. Mixed Land uses

Building homes together with small busi-nesses or even light industry is called “mixed use” development, and it has proven to cre-ate active, vital neighborhoods. This type of development includes: housing near an employment center, a small shopping center near housing, or a high-rise building with ground-floor retail and apartments or condo-miniums upstairs. Mixed-use development near transit can boost ridership and provide a viable alternative to driving.

completing the neighborhood—bringing jobs, housing, and re-

tail together and investing in bicycle & pedestrian infrastructure .

Blueprint Smart growthIn 2004, the SACOG Board of Directors adopted a bold vision for growth that pro-motes compact, mixed-use development and more transit choices as an alternative to low-density development. By collaborating with 5,000 residents, community leaders, and elected officials to study future land-use patterns and their potential effects on the region’s transportation, air quality, housing, open space, and other resources, SACOG planners discovered how they could reduce air emissions, traffic congestion, and urban sprawl. Computer modeling showed that implementing smart growth principles would shorten commute times, reduce traffic con-gestion, lessen dependence on automobiles, and provide for a range of housing choices affordable to the workforce and more aligned with the needs of an aging population. The Preferred Blueprint Scenario adopted by SACOG calls for development based on seven growth principles:


Sacramento Region

12

3. compact Development

Creating environments that are more compactly built and use space in an efficient and aesthetic manner can encourage more walking, biking, and public transit use, and discourage driving alone.

4. Housing choices

Providing a variety of places where people can live —apartments, con-dominiums, townhouses, and single-family detached homes on vary-ing lot sizes—creates opportunities for the variety of people who need them: families, singles, seniors, and people with special needs. This issue is of special concern for the people with very low-, low-, and moderate-income, for whom finding housing close to work is chal-lenging.

5. use Existing Assets

Focusing development in communities with vacant land or intensify-ing developments of underutilized land can make better use of public infrastructure, including roads. Building on existing assets can also mean refurbishing historic buildings or clustering buildings more densely in suburban office parks.

6. Quality Design

How projects are developed, how they are oriented in relationship to the street, how their facades are designed, if they have setbacks, and where their garages are placed all contribute to a community’s attrac-tiveness. This also influences how much people like to walk or bicycle, and contributes to community pride and sense of ownership.

7. Natural Resources conservation

Our quality of life is better when we have clean air to breathe and water to drink, and when we can experience the outdoors—in parks and greenbelts or in natural places. To ensure healthy and attractive natural environments, we must preserve and maintain our open spaces, natural places, and farmland.

Revitalizing DowntownsThe city of Marysville has undertaken four major planning

efforts to direct future public and private investment toward

creating a vital, thriving, and self-sustaining downtown

commercial district. revitalizing the area to create a lively

ambience is a priority to attract people, activities, and com-

merce to the downtown while maintaining the downtown’s

historic small town charm.

the city of citrus Heights is undertaking several efforts to

promote and improve bicycling and walking, transit and

vehicle movement and safety, incite economic develop-

ment, and revitalize an aging commercial corridor . cur-

rent projects include a Mesa verde High school bikeway

connection project partially funded through regional

funding, and bicycle lanes on major roadways such as

Old auburn and sunrise Blvd .

Ph

oT

o c

ou

rT

eSy

of

ciT

y o

f M

ar

ySv

ille

Ph

oT

o c

ou

rT

eSy

of

ciT

y o

f c

iTr

uS

he

iGh

TS

residents fill the streets at an event in downtown Marysville .


Metropolitan Transportation Plan/ Sustainable communities Strategy (MTP/ScS)The MTP/SCS is an important evolution-ary milestone along the path of inclusive, equitable, integrated transportation and land use, and performance-based planning that SACOG began with the Blueprint. The proj-ects in the Master Plan are key components to implementing the MTP/SCS.

The MTP/SCS will allow for the coordina-tion of projects among jurisdictions to ensure that crucial linkages are created in a timely, cost effective, and efficient manner. The MTP/SCS emphasizes expanding the net-work of separated, multi-use paths (class I), bike lanes (class II), and providing alternate, attractive bike routes (class III) in corridors where existing routes are insufficient or unat-tractive to use. The MTP/SCS also supports compact land uses and a street pattern that promotes walking. Together, these strategies provide the opportunity to make shorter trips, and make a higher share of trips by walking or bicycling.

The MTP/ScS significantly reduces

the commute drive-alone share by

offering better alternatives to solo

driving. As a result of the MTP/ScS,

bike and walk shares should increase

from 3.2 percent in 2008 to 3.8 percent

by 2035.2

As the Sacramento region’s first MTP/SCS adopted under Senate Bill 375 (SB 375) and the second plan to link a regional growth pattern and smart land use principles to the transportation system, this plan has many unique features:

• an absolute reduction in the amount of heavy congestion typical residents will experience in their daily lives;

2 SACOG Metropolitan Transportation Plan/ Sustainable

Communities Strategy 2035

• significant increases in the productivity of the transit system, with more riders and a higher percentage of total revenue coming from user fares; greater levels of investment in a multi-modal transporta-tion system, including complete streets, bicycle and pedestrian facilities;

• better integration of future land use pat-terns, transportation investments, and air quality impacts, including higher levels of development near current and future transit corridors and California Environ-mental Quality Act (CEQA) incentives for residential and residential mixed-use projects that produce transportation and air quality benefits;

• the first phase of implementation of the findings from the ongoing Rural-Urban Connections Strategy;

• the foundation for the next Regional Housing Needs Plan; and

• reductions in per capita passenger vehicle greenhouse gas emissions that exceed the minimum targets established for the SACOG region by the California Air Re-sources Board.

Over the next 22 years, the MTP/SCS pro-poses to invest $2.8 billion to bicycle and pedestrian projects. Policies and investments in the project lists include:

• Projects that implement “complete streets” concepts, where the right-of-way is designed for all modes of travel, includ-ing pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit, as well as automobiles.

• Sidewalk network extensions in urban neighborhoods with segments widened where needed.

• Complementary pedestrian bridges and pedestrian intersection improvements that include ADA-compatible ramps, bulb-outs and special crossing signals.

• Bike lanes on more neighborhood and major streets.

• Multi-use bike/pedestrian trails (off-street, grade-separated) that offer resi-dents the opportunity to make utilitarian and leisure trips separated from vehicular traffic.

• Bike facilities (racks, lockers, bathrooms) at major transit stops/hubs (light rail, BRT, etc.) and at key activity centers (downtown Sacramento, shopping malls, large office complexes, etc.).

The MTP/SCS focuses on compact devel-

Ph

oT

o c

ou

rT

eSy

of

da

ve

ca

SSe

lBicycle and pedestrian bridges

provide essential connections

for non-motorized travel . a

cyclist on the sunrise Footbridge

in sacramento county crosses

the american river and travels

to popular business parks and

residential neighborhoods .

completing the street in down-

town city of Placerville encourages

people to walk and bike to restau-

rants, businesses, and shopping .


Sacramento Region

14

50

FOLSOM BLVD

COLOMA RD

MATH

ER FIELD RD

A

B

CD

transit PriOrity PlanninG area

transit PriOrity PrOJects

Bus line

liGHt rail line

opment to encourage more walking, biking, transit use, and shorter auto trips. To create a more compact land use pattern, projected development revolves around the addition of more small-lot and at-tached housing, increased infill and redevelopment opportunities, and planning for communities with a mix of uses. The forecasted land use patterns accommodate a 40 percent population increase with only an additional 7 percent of land developed (53,266 acres).3 The MTP/SCS projects that the total share of housing in Centers and Corridors—areas with higher density, more mixed uses, and a wider variety of transportation infrastructure—will increase from 12 percent in 2008 to 16 percent in 2035, primarily on vacant or underutilized land in close proximity to services and employment opportunities.

3 SACOG Metropolitan Transportation Plan/ Sustainable Communities Strategy for 2035

MTP/ScS guiding Principles

• Smart Land Use—Design a transportation system to sup-port good growth patterns, including increased housing and transportation options, focusing more growth inward and improving the economic viability of rural areas.

• Environmental Quality and Sustainability—Minimize di-rect and indirect transportation impacts on the environment for cleaner air and natural resource protection.

• Financial Stewardship—Manage resources for a transporta-tion system that delivers cost-effective results and is feasible to construct and maintain.

• Economic Vitality—Efficiently connect people to jobs and get goods to market.

• Access and Mobility—Improve opportunities for businesses and citizens to easily access goods, jobs, services and housing.

• Equity and Choice—Provide real, viable travel choices for all people throughout our diverse region

Transit Priority Areas (TPAs)

the Mather/Mills light rail station in rancho

cordova is a designated tPa, and is one of five

communities that are one step closer to having

new housing, jobs, and shops easily accessible

by transit . tPas are areas within a ½-mile of

high quality transit: a rail stop or a bus corridor

that provides or will provide at least 15-min-

ute frequency service during peak hours by

the year 2035 . compared to residents outside

the tPas, residents within tPas in the current

MtP/scs experience many benefits, including:

• living in one of the region’s highest

employment areas;

• 27 percent lower vehicle miles traveled

per capita;

• 5 percent lower vehicle trips;

• 29 percent higher walk and bike trips;

• 26 percent lower greenhouse gas

emissions; and

• 236 percent higher transit trips .


Rural urban connection Strategy (RucS) Building on Blueprint, the Rural-Urban Connections Strategy (RUCS) looks at the region’s growth and sustainability objectives from a rural perspective. In the same way that Blueprint is an economic development strate-gy for urban areas, RUCS will be an economic and environmental sustainability strategy for rural areas.

RUCS works to support the region’s agri-cultural legacy and promote economic de-velopment in rural communities. Through RUCS, SACOG engages with a wide group of stakeholders, including local government officials, the University of California Co-operative Extension, local Farm Bureaus, growers, and food activists. During outreach initiatives, RUCS stakeholders identified dif-ferent opportunities to integrate bicycle and pedestrian concerns into the project, such as reducing conflict between bicyclists/pedestri-ans and agricultural vehicles/equipment. As RUCS evolves, it will continue to consider designing rural communities that support all modes of transportation.

The current RUCS effort focuses on:

• land use and conservation: policies and plans that shape rural areas;

• the infrastructure of agriculture: chal-lenges to the production process;

• economic opportunities: new ways to grow revenue;

• forest management: building up econom-ic and environmental value; and

• regulations: navigating federal and state environmental guidelines.

yolo county has focused on implementing Blueprint by direct-

ing development within city and community boundaries, and

improving rural roads for bicyclists, goods movement trucks,

agricultural vehicles, and motorists .

Supporting Rural Roads

Yolo County continues to pursue

increasing safety along corridors be-

tween the cities of Davis, Woodland,

and Winters. The County’s adopted

2012 Priorities focused on pursuing

full funding for the County Road 98

Safety Improvement Project. Yolo

County has been awarded funding

from state and regional programs to

make improvements such as add-

ing shoulders and bike lanes on this

corridor, and is pursuing options to

secure additional funds to complete

the project.


Sacramento Region

16

5

Regional visionThe Master Plan envisions a complete transportation system that supports healthy living and active communities where bicycling and walking are viable and popular travel choices in a comprehensive, safe, and convenient network.

Regional goals, Strategies, and ActionsThis section contains goals, strategies and actions identified by a subcommittee of the Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee and adopted by the SACOG Board of Directors. The Goals support the Regional Vision and de-scribe important aspects of priorities and attitudes of the region. The Strategies identify the types of approaches the region (including SACOG, local agencies, advocacy groups, and other organizations) can take to support the goals. And finally, the Actions are specific steps that SACOG can take to help implement the Master Plan’s Vision.

wHERE ARE wE goiNg?


goal 1: increase and improve bicycle and pedestrian access and mobility for residents and visitors of all ages and abilities.

Strategies:

1.A: Develop a continuous bicycle and pedestrian network over the next 20 years (e.g., remove barriers, add crossings, fill gaps, connect spurs to existing networks).

1.B: Improve access from residential areas to activity centers, particularly schools, transit, and employment centers.

1.C: Improve access within a half mile around transit and schools.

1.D: Create regional wayfinding system.

1.E: Make bicycle and pedestrian travel available to a wider audience through better integra-tion with other travel modes (i.e. transit). Efforts include working with public and private partners to develop and implement a bikeshare program in the SACOG region.

Actions:

i Encourage development patterns that provide safe and efficient pedestrian and bicycle access to transit stops and trunk commuter transit lines. (MTP Goal 3 Strategy 6)

ii Invest in safe bicycle and pedestrian routes that improve connectivity and access to com-mon destinations, such as connections between residential areas and schools, work sites, neighborhood shopping, and transit stops and stations. Also invest in safe routes to and around schools so trips can be made by bicycling or walking. (MTP Policy 29 Strategy 1)

iii Seek to improve transit access, via safe and pleasant sidewalks and walkways around tran-sit stops, designated bike routes and directional signage, accessibility for the disabled, on-board bike racks, better signs for transit access, shelters and improved transfer points, and secure bike storage facilities and park-and-ride locations. (MTP Policy 20 Strategy 1)

iv Work with regional stakeholders to facilitate regional wayfinding system to encourage bicycle and pedestrian travel on the network of streets, bikeways, and walkways, if and when resources allow.

walk friendly communities

Walk Friendly Communities is a national

recognition program that began in 2010 and

is maintained by the Pedestrian and Bicycle

Information Center to encourage towns and

cities to establish or recommit to supporting

safer walking environments. The application

is an interactive process that helps cities and

towns identify areas of improvement re-

garding pedestrian safety, mobility, access,

and comfort. The city of Rancho Cordova

has been awarded an Honorable Mention.

rancho cordova’s implementa-

tion of pedestrian-friendly facili-

ties has created walkable areas .

Here, two people enjoy walking at

Hagen Park .

constructing bicycle and pedestrian

infrastructure is essential for providing

real, viable transportation options.

The city of Auburn is installing bicycle

lanes and adjacent sidewalks along

Nevada Street to allow for continuous

bike and pedestrian access from old

Town Auburn to the Auburn Station

and Ev cain Middle School.

Ph

oT

o c

ou

rT

eSy

of

ciT

y o

f r

an

ch

o c

or

do

va


Sacramento Region

18

goal 2: improve and maintain the quality and operation of bikeway and walkway networks.

Strategies:

2.A: Remove physical barriers to walking and biking.

2.B: Create and implement the improvements needed to promote an attractive and desirable bicycle and pedestrian network.

2.C: Apply technological improvements (e.g., flashing lights, crosswalk buttons, and bike de-tection).

2.D: Maintain bikeway and walkway facilities in good condition.

Actions:

i Support improved connectivity and increased safety and security through better main-tenance of existing crossings (river, freeway, rail) and other structural barriers in Centers and Corridors Community Types. (modified MTP Policy 27 Strategy 4)

ii Support corridor mobility investments that serve multiple modes of travel through com-bining road capacity improvements with operational improvements to support smart growth. Supportive investments include enhancements for high-quality transit, technol-ogy deployment, bicycle and pedestrian improvements, and safer intersections. (modified MTP Policy 27 Strategy 2)

iii Provide technical guidance to local agencies and invest regional funds to build complete streets projects through designated and planned community activity centers, to ensure bicycles, pedestrians, and transit can share the road safely and compatibility with autos. (MTP Policy 30 Strategy 6)

iv Support local agencies in developing multi-year maintenance and rehabilitation programs that enable early identification of cost-effective enhancements to improve pedestrian and bicycle access and safety. Ensure that regional funding is not directed to new development projects where local agencies should require developers to fund these types of improve-ments. (modified MTP Policy 17 Strategy 5)

The union Pacific (uP) Railroad has

been in the Sacramento region for over

150 years, and sometimes providing

comfortable, convenient crossings

across the tracks can be challenging.

The city of colfax is constructing

pedestrian improvements across uP

railroad tracks to improve pedestrian

safety and conditions for walking and

biking.

removing large structural barri-

ers can significantly facilitate and

improve bicycle and pedestrian

travel . Partially funded through

the Bicycle & Pedestrian Funding

Program, the city of sacramento

recently constructed a new bike/

ped bridge over i-80 at the West

canal, just west of the i-5/i-80

interchange .

Ph

oT

o c

ou

rT

eSy

of

ciT

y o

f Sa

cr

aM

en

To


goal 3: improve bicycle and pedestrian safety.

Strategies:

3.A: Create a safe environment for bicycle and pedestrian travel at intersections and street crossings.

3.B: Promote complete streets and application of context-sensitive complete streets treat-ments, including constructing and retrofitting new and existing facilities and networks to increase bicyclist and pedestrian safety, and separating motorist, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities from each other to reduce conflicts through appropriate designs, when necessary.

3.C: Increase support of bicycling and walking as travel modes through treatments such as street signage, median refuge islands, dynamic lighting, traffic calming devices, and feed-backs signs, especially in congested areas such as school zones, central business districts, activity centers and high volume bicycle/pedestrian/automobile roadways and networks.

3.D: Increase coordination with law enforcement to create safe environments for bicycling and walking using a variety of resources available (e.g., enhanced enforcement of traffic laws, feedback signs), especially around schools and other high bicycle and pedestrian traffic areas.

Actions:

i Take steps to improve safety and security at crosswalks, transit stops, and along main ac-cess routes to transit, including rural areas, with higher priority for low income, minority, and high crime areas. (MTP Policy 20 Strategy 3)

ii Continue to identify best practices for complete streets, continue to add to the Complete Streets Toolkit, and initiate a technical assistance program to help local agencies develop street designs that are sensitive to their surroundings and context. Provide technical sup-port as resources allow. (modified MTP Policy 3 Strategy 2)

iii Promote the use of safety information (e.g. SWITRS) to jurisdictions working to identify trouble areas in need of safety-enhancing improvements.

iv Help local agencies get funding from specific safety programs for safety and security improvements. (MTP Policy 14 Strategy 4)

DD-64 Statewide complete Streets

implementation

Caltrans Deputy Directive 64-R1 requires

projects to consider all users of the trans-

portation system to ensure that people of all

ages and abilities can travel along and across

a network of complete streets. Incorporat-

ing bicycle and pedestrian improvements

into regular planning and rehabilitation proj-

ects is an important step towards creating

the network described by Caltrans. In 2010,

Caltrans developed a Complete Streets Im-

plementation Plan, which is now available at

http://www.dot.ca.gov/

walk Audits

To identify barriers that prevented kids from

walking or biking to school, Sacramento

County partnered with WALKSacramento

to promote biking and walking events at

the schools, draft a Safe Routes to School

toolkit, and conduct walkability and bike-

ability audits helping to identify many infra-

structure improvements that increase safety

around schools.

in the city of sacramento, the

Bannon creek elementary safe

routes to school project, at the

intersection of Millcreek Dr .

and West el camino Blvd,

resulted in many infrastructure

improvements to increase the

safety of non-motorized travel .

Bulb-outs reduce the pedestrian

crossing distance, a pedestrian

countdown tells how much time

remains to cross the street, and

the installation of a stoplight

(with bicycle detection) and stop

bars provide amenities walkers

and bikers need .

Ph

oT

o c

ou

rT

eSy

of

Wa

lkSa

cr

aM

en

To


Sacramento Region

20

Goal 4: Increase the number of bicycle and pedestrian trips.

Strategies:

4.A: Work with local jurisdictions to facilitate bicycle-friendly and pedestrian-friendly devel-opment activity and support facilities around transit stations.

4.B: Support programs aimed at increasing bicycle and walking trips by providing incentives, recognition, or services that make bicycling and walking more convenient transportation modes.

4.C: Increase the number of bicycle and pedestrian facilities in the region, specifically targeting areas with a high number of current and potential users.

4.D: Improve convenience of bicycle and pedestrian travel through innovative projects and programs (e.g., bikeshare program).

4.E: Encourage physical activity by supporting projects that promote active and recreational activities.

4.F: Encourage strategic location of new bicycle and pedestrian facilities where existing or planned development patterns offer the greatest opportunity for high use (e.g. to and around transit priority areas).

Actions:

i Pursue strategic road expansion that reduces congestion and supports effective transit services, walking and bicycling. (MTP Policy 30 Strategy 1)

ii Continue to participate in coordination and planning meetings, and lead coordination efforts as feasible.

iii Continue to use funds coming through SACOG to fund regional objectives for air qual-ity, community design, transportation demand management, and bicycle and pedestrian programs. The funding level should be proportionally at least as great as programming levels since the regional programs began in 2003. (MTP Policy 31 Strategy 1)

iv Continue funding bikeway and walkway projects through the regional funding programs to provide safe, comfortable, and convenient travel options.

Bicycle Friendly AwardsThe League of American Bicyclists cre-

ated the “Bicycle Friendly America” pro-

gram in 1996 to provide incentives and

hands-on assistance to communities

supporting bicycling both in terms of the

infrastructure and the support services

offered. Communities, universities, and

businesses may apply for the award and

solicit the efforts of city officials, public

agencies, and local/community bicycle

advocates in order to create a holistic ap-

proach to the communities’ bike friendly

efforts.

Bicycle Friendly Communities and Uni-

versities in the Sacramento region:

• City of Davis (Platinum)

• City of Folsom (Silver)

• City of Roseville (Bronze)

• City of Sacramento (Silver)

• University of California, Davis (Platinum)

City of sacramento transporta-

tion Director Jerry Way, Coun-

cilmembers angelique ashby

and steve Cohn celebrating their

2011 rise in status from bronze to

silver, attained in five years. P

ho

to

co

ur

te

sy o

f c

ity

of

sac

ra

me

nt

o

In 2009, the city of Davis endorsed

a “road diet” that would reduce

the number of lanes on 5th Street

from four lanes to three lanes. The

city conducted public outreach to

identify the needs of all travel modes,

incorporate the needs into the projects

final design. The purpose of the

project is to improve pedestrian safety,

improve bicycle connectivity, and

reduce motor vehicle speeds, while

maintaining overall vehicle capacity.


goal 5: increase the number of high quality support facilities to complement the bicycle and walkway networks.

Strategies:

5.A: Involve community and business organization in siting locations for support facilities, e.g. bike corrals, lockers, bike parking, showers, bike storage, water fountains.

5.B: Build support facilities at pivotal areas within the bicycle and pedestrian network, e.g. high-volume transit stations, converging non-motorized network trails and paths, activ-ity centers.

5.C: Provide support to local jurisdictions and/or special districts interested in constructing facilities.

Actions:

i Support implementation of support facilities through regional funding programs as fea-sible and appropriate.

ii When planning high-quality transit along light rail, regional rail and high speed rail cor-ridors, also plan for supportive features that include sidewalks and walkways, passenger shelters, or transfer stations, next-bus notification signs, signal preemption, park and-ride lots, and bicycle parking and storage. (modified MTP Policy 28 Strategy 1)

iii Provide technical assistance to local jurisdictions as requested (e.g. funding and modeling information, maps and data).

Sacramento county, city of Rancho cordova, and SAcog are working with

the community through a project called “Plan folsom Blvd” to improve access

for pedestrians and bicyclists to five transit-oriented development sites along

Sacramento Regional Transit’s gold Line. Plan folsom Blvd will identify inadequate

or non-existent bike lanes and sidewalks, existing barriers, and the utility

infrastructure needs of ToD sites. once complete, the plan will provide practical

examples within our region of how to create complete communities near light rail

stations and bus stops with planned frequent service. More information is available

at http://www.planfolsomblvd.org

Ph

oT

o c

ou

rT

eSy

of

ciT

y o

f fo

lSo

MP

ho

To

co

ur

Te

Sy o

f n

nT

Ma

the north natomas transporta-

tion Management association

(nntMa) provides a free “Bike

Doc” bicycle repair program . each

year Bike Doc visits north nato-

mas schools, community events,

and local businesses to repair and

provide maintenance to residents’

and employees’ bikes . the one of

a kind Bike Doc cargo bike is rid-

den to each and every location .

secure, on-demand bike park-

ing facilities at transit stations

facilitate multi-modal travel .


Sacramento Region

22

goal 6: increase education, encouragement and awareness programs about bicycle and pedestrian travel.

Strategies:

6.A: Promote public education of vehicle, bicycle and walking safety and traffic laws to a variety of stakeholders, including law enforcement, motorists, bicyclists, and pedestrians.

6.B: Promote public awareness of safe driving, cycling, and walking behaviors, including travel on rural roads.

6.C: Promote public and stakeholder awareness of public health and safety benefits of in-creased bicycling and walking.

6.D: Promote cycling and walking programs through schools, community events and cam-paigns; at community workshops and other public forums.

6.E: Promote public and stakeholder awareness of widespread benefits affiliated with bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure, including increased public health, property values, recre-ation benefits, and environmental benefits.

Actions:

i Encourage conversation and coordination between Safe Routes to School efforts through-out the region.

ii Continue to update Online Bicycle Trip Planner, and provide information and trainings to individuals and agencies interested in the program, as requested.

iii Expand transportation management associations and outreach partners to provide educa-tion and advocacy programs across the region’s six county area, with broader focus on alternative travel choices for all trip types. (MTP Goal 22 Strategy 2)

iv Continue to make available free-of-charge multilingual video and guidebook on transit, bicycling, walking, and carpooling in the region to individuals, community- and faith-based organizations, as well as on the SacRegion 511 website. (MTP Goal 24 Strategy 6)

v Continue and expand public outreach programs (e.g. May is Bike Month), that increase attention to and work with schools, as resources allow.

vi Continue the region’s previous commitment to Transportation Demand Management programs as a Strategy for education and promotion of alternative travel modes for all types of trips toward reducing vehicle miles traveled by 10 percent. (MTP Goal 8 Strategy 1)

community outreach

Public input is a critical element for bicycle

and pedestrian plans and projects, as it gives

community members the chance to express

their wants, needs, and expectations of bi-

cycle and pedestrian facilities. The city of

Citrus Heights has developed a robust com-

munity outreach effort to collaborate with

the residents on proposed trail projects,

such as their feasibility study for a multi-use

trail system within the city’s creek corridors.

Stakeholders from all ten Citrus Heights

Neighborhood Associations as well as bicy-

cle and pedestrian advocates are invited to

participate and provide input that will inform

the final recommendations.

in addition to making com-

munities more livable, provid-

ing opportunities for improved

public health, and boosting local

economies through tourism,

multi-purpose trails also have

a positive effect on residential

property values . a university of

cincinnati study, Understanding

the Economic Benefits of Trails on

Residential Property Values in the

Presence of Spatial Dependence,

demonstrated that housing prices

went up as they approached the

little Miami scenic trail entrance .

the conclusion was that on aver-

age, homeowners were willing

to pay a $9,000 premium to be

located one thousand feet closer

to the trail .


goal 7: create a comprehensive regional bicycling and walking network within and between communities with strong current and future demand.

Strategies:

7.A: Improve connectivity and planning of non-motorized networks within and between communities and jurisdictions in the region.

7.B: Plan and construct facilities with the greatest potential to support utilitarian bicycle and walking trips that are less than three miles.

7.C: Plan and construct facilities for distances greater than three miles to support bicycle com-muters as well as recreational users.

7.D: Define a comprehensive regional bicycling network that connects jurisdictions; provides connections to transit priority areas, major activity centers and business districts; consid-ers state-designated bike routes; utilizes Rails-to-Trails when feasible; and includes the American River Parkway.

Actions:

i Encourage local agencies to develop an interconnected system of streets, bikeways, and walkways that support a more compact development form; encourage local agencies to place conditions on new developments to avoid building new circulation barriers; ac-commodate safe travel for all users; and provide connections across creeks, freeways and high-speed/high volume arterials and through existing gated communities, walls and cul-de-sacs to access schools, activity centers and transit stops. (modified MTP Policy 3 Strategy 5)

ii Continue to support improved bicycle and pedestrian connectivity through SACOG’s regional funding programs and maintaining program criteria that regional road rehabili-tation projects include complete streets or complete corridor features. (MTP Policy 29 Strategy 4)

iii Invest toward the creation of a regional bicycle and pedestrian network, connecting first those communities that already have good local circulation networks in place, but also supporting efforts throughout the region to improve connectivity and realize public health benefits from these investments. (MTP Policy 29 Strategy 2)

iv Work with local jurisdictions to develop and refine a regional bikeway network.

v Encourage cities and counties to collect development-based fees or funding sufficient for both local road improvements and regional-scale road, transit and/or bicycle pedestrian improvements so that regional-scale improvements can be built in a timely way, since SACOG’s regional funding can meet only 25-30 percent of regional project costs in this MTP. (MTP Policy 13 Strategy 3)

American River Parkway

The American River Parkway is an excep-

tional asset to the Sacramento region.

Created in 1983, the parkway is a 23 mile,

4,600 acre expanse of land, water, and na-

ture. Using the American River Parkway and

Sacramento city trails, residents can ride

continuously from Downtown Sacramento

to Folsom Lake. This highly used corridor

serves commuters as well as recreational

cyclists, runners, and families. Source:

http://www.arpf.org

Ph

oT

o c

ou

rT

eSy

of

da

ve

ca

SSe

lP

ho

To

co

ur

Te

Sy o

f c

iTy

of

Sac

ra

Me

nT

o

commuters, tourists, athletes and

families travel on the american

river Parkway throughout the

year .

Bicycle bridges provide needed

connections for residents and

commuters to travel by foot or

by bike .


Sacramento Region

24

goal 8: increase collaboration among stakeholders throughout the region to seek funding and implement bicycle and pedestrian projects, programs, and related efforts.

Strategies:

8.A: Encourage partnerships with community organizations and agencies outside of the trans-portation field.

8.B: Encourage and support local agencies to apply for funding outside of SACOG sources (e.g., Safe Routes to School, Highway Safety Improvement Program, Bicycle Transporta-tion Account, and other funding opportunities) for projects and programs.

8.C: Collaborate with local law enforcement agencies and local elected officials.

8.D: Support regional agencies in assembling consistent funding measures to maintain, coor-dinate and allocate efforts for thriving non-motorized facilities.

Actions:

i Cooperate with federal and state initiatives designed to better integrate planning and actions across multiple disciplines. (MTP Goal 14 Strategy 16)

ii Utilize the Planners Committee, Regional Planning Partnership and Transit Coordinat-ing Committee to better coordinate information-sharing between jurisdictions on tran-sit, bicycle and pedestrian improvements to ensure connected routes, sharing of effective ideas, and more complete public information. (MTP Policy 29 Strategy 3)

iii Help facilitate improved coordination between transit agencies, public works depart-ments and local land use authorities in planning new developments that are transit-, bi-cycle-, and pedestrian-supportive and timed so that new facilities and transit services are more likely to be available at the time the new growth occurs. (MTP Policy 29 Strategy 5)

v Continue to provide members with support—including letters of support, grant review, maps and data—for projects seeking funding outside SACOG sources.

iv SACOG may serve as a clearinghouse of funding information, participate in stakeholder meetings, and serve as coordinator for regional efforts, as resources allow.

vi Support local agencies that seek to collaborate on inter-jurisdictional funding options. (MTP Policy 12 Strategy 3)

The Region is Thinking Long Term

Multiple partners, including the city of Ros-

eville, Placer County, Sacramento County,

Orangevale Recreation and Park District,

city of Folsom, and Sacramento Area Bi-

cycle Advocates (SABA) are working to plan

a continuous network of bike paths around

the region—connecting the American River

Parkway to Dry Creek trails throughout Ros-

eville and Placer County, and connecting

to the Sacramento Northern Trail in Sacra-

mento County.

The 4th annual Safe Routes to School

national conference will take place

Aug. 13-15, 2013 in Sacramento,

hosted by the Local government

commission (Lgc), partnering with the

california Department of Public Health

(cDPH), the california Department

of Transportation (caltrans), the

Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality

Management District (SMAQMD),

SABA, wALkSacramento, and SAcog.

the plan to build trails that will

connect existing facilities would

provide a continuous bike path

around the entire region .

Ph

oT

o B

y d

av

e c

aSS

el

co

ur

Te

Sy o

f c

iTy

of

ro

Sev

ille


goal 9: increase collection of bicycle and pedestrian related data.

Strategies:

9.A: Create and maintain an inventory of current bicycle and pedestrian facilities and safety data, and strive to ensure quality of data.

9.B: Encourage inclusion of bike and pedestrian modes as part of regular traffic counts, and conduct bicyclist and pedestrian counts both prior to and following implementation of infrastructure projects.

9.C: Research opportunities and apply for funding to conduct bicycle and pedestrian counts, as well as technical assistance with the bike/pedestrian counts, as feasible.

9.D: Assess the bicycle and pedestrian networks to identify and prioritize specific areas in need of safety improvements to create a safe, connective, and continuous bicycle and pedes-trian network.

9.E: Develop tools to demonstrate project performance measures.

Actions:

i As resources and data allow, work with local agencies to develop methods for evaluating performance measures, continue to create and maintain bicycle and pedestrian facility in-formation, analyze existing and proposed regional network and identify gaps in network, and create and maintain safety information (i.e., collision, injuries, and death).

ii Continue to review Bicycle Transportation/Master Plans for compliance with Streets & Highways Code 891.2 and Pedestrian Master Plans, as well as provide support and as-sistance for master plans as needed.

iii Monitor and report on commute patterns for all modes, traffic levels, and transit use and bicycle and pedestrian mode share compared with the projections in the MTP/SCS. (MTP Policy 2 Strategy 3)

MAP-21

The passage of Moving Ahead for Progress

in the 21st Century (MAP-21) in 2012 marked

the creation of a streamlined, performance-

based surface transportation program. Most

projects eligible for federal funds under pre-

vious transportation bills are still eligible, but

they must be able to demonstrate progress

towards the following performance goals:

• safety, to achieve a significant reduction

in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on

all public roads;

• infrastructure condition, to maintain the

highway infrastructure asset system in a

state of good repair;

• congestion reduction, to achieve a sig-

nificant reduction in congestion on the

National Highway System;

• system reliability, to improve the ef-

ficiency of the surface transportation

system;

• freight movement and economic vitality,

to improve the national freight network,

strengthen the ability of rural communi-

ties to access national and international

trade markets, and support regional eco-

nomic development;

• environmental sustainability, to enhance

the performance of the transportation

system while protecting and enhancing

the natural environment; and

• reduced project delivery delays, to re-

duce project costs, promote jobs and the

economy, and expedite the movement

of people and goods by accelerating

project completion through eliminat-

ing delays in the project development

and delivery process, including reducing

regulatory burdens and improving agen-

cies’ work practices.


Sacramento Region

26

6oPPoRTuNiTiES AND cHALLENgES

Many opportunities exist throughout the region to improve bicycling and pedestrian condi-tions, and increase the use of facilities. Cities and counties are making strides to maximize opportunities available, such as incorporating bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure in all new transportation projects, to increase access for bicycle and pedestrian transportation. The region is fortunate to have open space and river areas that have been invested in as bike/ped corridors to serve recreational and transportation purposes. An abundance of scenic corridors compliment an existing network of bicycle facilities both on lower traffic volume roads and on connector and arterial streets, providing connectivity to popular destinations, residential areas and employment centers.

innovative Projects

A variety of innovative treatments are gain-

ing traction across the United States and in

California. Cycle tracks (protected bike lanes

that are physically separated from the road),

green bicycle lanes, and bicycle boulevards

are all examples of fresh approaches to fa-

cilitate and encourage more bicycling. While

not all innovative treatments are recognized

as bikeways in the Manual on Uniform Traffic

Control Devices (MUTCD), many communi-

ties have successfully sought and received

Federal Highway Administration permission

for an “experimental” facility.

To find out what bicycle facilities, signs, and

markings are permitted in the MUTCD, what

has interim approval, and what is currently

experimental, visit http://www.fhwa.dot.

gov/environment/bicycle_pedestrian/guid-

ance/design_guidance/mutcd_bike.cfm

innovative infrastructure projects

such as green bicycle lanes in the

city of West sacramento, encour-

age new and existing riders to

travel by bicycle .

Ph

oT

o c

ou

rT

eSy

of

yo

lo c

ou

nT

y T

ra

nSP

or

TaT

ion

diS

Tr

icT


However, bicycle and pedestrian facilities are often considered a local commitment rather than a regional or statewide transportation need. There are still many challenges in the Sacramento region that can benefit from regional coordination and collaboration. Engaging at the regional level permits greater information sharing about the variety of ways communities have solved or mitigated issues surrounding the following challenges:

• Lack of sidewalks and bicycle infrastructure in urban areas, especially in the vicinity of schools and transit stops;

• Lack of safe bicycle storage facilities at work sites and transit stations;

• Lack of continuous facilities to enable direct walking and bicycle trips without necessitating circuitous routing;

• Narrow rural roadways with poor sight distances and narrow or no shoulders to accommo-date bicyclists and pedestrians;

• Barriers created by natural (e.g. rivers and wetlands) and man-made (e.g. large freeway in-terchanges) impediments;

• High speed/volume roadways, such as major arterial roads, that are uncomfortable for use by bicyclists even when bike infrastructure is provided; and

• Streets and corridors that do not provide access for pedestrian and bicycle transportation.

While these opportunities and challenges are not unique to the Sacramento region, the solution each community is able to develop will respond individually to the wants and needs of our region’s residents.

when Highways are Main Streets

Making pedestrian and bicycle improve-

ments along a state highway can add a layer

of complexity to projects, but also allows for

greater coordination with Caltrans. City of

Wheatland frequently works with Caltrans

staff to make improvements along State

Route 65, which bisects the city and serves

as Main Street. The City and Caltrans have

collaborated to install traffic signals, side-

walks, and curbs along SR 65 using funds

from the federal Safe Routes to School pro-

gram and the State Highway Operation and

Protection Program.

educating bicyclists, pedestrians,

and motorists about safe travel

behavior is an important compo-

nent to integrating all modes into

one transportation system .


Sacramento Region

28

Every two years, SACOG holds a regional funding round where flexible federal funds are made available through a competitive process to local agencies within the four- county region. The funding round applies only to jurisdictions within Sacramento, Sutter, Yolo and Yuba counties; El Dorado and Placer counties have their own funding distribution processes. The regional funding round focuses on the following areas: Air Quality, Bicycle & Pedestrian, Community Design, Regional/Local, and Transportation Demand Management.

The purpose of the Bicycle & Pedestrian Funding Program (Funding Program) is to help imple-ment the MTP/SCS by providing facilities for walking and biking within the cities and towns of the region and providing connections between them. A complete transportation system is a key component to achieving the goals set forth by Blueprint and MTP/SCS.

In order to help implement the Regional Vision, Goals, Strategies, and Actions in the Master Plan, and by extension the MTP/SCS, SACOG worked in partnership with stakeholders and the Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory Committee to develop regional funding priorities. The fund-ing priorities maximize the opportunities available in the region and tackle existing challenges.

The priorities also serve as performance objectives that projects included in the Master Plan must demonstrate in order to be eligible for the Funding Program. These priorities are designed to serve as a filter for the expansive project list included in Appendix B.

Projects competing for funding in the Funding Program must demonstrate performance in the following categories (in no priority order):

• Increase access to transit services;

• Increase access to schools;

• Eliminate gaps in the existing bicycle/pedestrian network;

• Remove physical barriers in the bicycle and pedestrian network;

• Facility completion; and

• Reduce Vehicles Miles Traveled.

Measuring project performance is a key component to providing local agencies the ability to evaluate the project investment and design, as well as meet the spirit of performance-based planning identified as a priority in the Master Plan, Funding Program, MTP/SCS, and MAP-21 program.

More information about SACOG’s Bicycle & Pedestrian Funding Program and other funding programs is available at http://www.sacog.org

7iMPLEMENTiNg REgioNAL PRioRiTiES


coordinated EffortsSAcog serves as a forum for regional transportation planning and funding, and for the study and resolution of regional issues. working with city and county agencies, stakeholder groups, advocacy organizations and members of the public is a central tenet to SAcog’s work.

8iMPoRTANT focuS AREAS

Shared Services & New initiatives

In 2012, SACOG began a new effort to pro-

vide shared member services, at the direc-

tion of the SACOG Board-led Shared Ser-

vices & New Initiatives Task Force. Existing

initiatives include:

• General Plan technical support — in-

volving technical review and project

management support, GIS/data support,

policy/planning support, and public par-

ticipation services;

• regional advocacy — including lobby-

ing, legislative and regulatory analysis,

creating educational materials, and re-

gional collaboration and coordination;

• Pooled Purchasing & Pooled risk — in-

cludes pooled materials, equipment and

service purchasing, as well as insurance/

risk management;

• information technology (it) and Web

support — includes design, network

support, data sharing and other IT/web

services;

• compensation survey — includes com-

pensation surveys, benefits surveys, doc-

ument warehouse, and other HR related

services;

• regional Grant Writer — provides grant

tracking and opportunity assessment,

technical expertise, strategic positioning,

grant development, and grant collabora-

tion and coordination;

• travel Demand Forecasting & analysis

services; and

• linking local & regional Plans to sup-

port economic Development

community involvement

Community involvement is necessary to identify barriers and opportunities for improvement in the region. Whether it is to provide consultation on planning efforts, like through Bicycle and Pedestrian Advocacy Committees, or in participation, like May is Bike Month, the best way to address the needs of the community is to hear it from the residents themselves. In addition to advising and directing the work that we do here at SACOG, active and involved residents are a source of pride and unity in a community. Agreement may not always be possible but collabora-tion and understanding will guide us forward in ensuring that we continue to develop in a way that is beneficial to the entire region.

The crux of community involvement for SACOG’s work stems from the outreach conducted for the MTP/SCS. During the public outreach component of the MTP/SCS, three scenarios were presented—Scenario 1 had the least amount of bicycle and pedestrian and trail projects while Scenario 3 had the most (Scenario 2 had more active transportation investment than Scenario 1 but less than Scenario 3). In December 2010, the SACOG Board of Directors adopted a frame-work to create an MTP/SCS Draft Preferred Scenario, which was based on the results of public workshops and focus group input. The Draft Preferred Scenario adopted, which established the transportation investments and land use growth assumptions to underpin the MTP/SCS, was based on Workshop Scenario 3, with elements of Scenario 2 for Sutter and Placer counties.


Sacramento Region

30

Advisory committees

SACOG’s Board of Directors has established

a number of advisory committees as a

means to obtain advice from citizens, key in-

terest groups in the community, and partner

planning agencies on a variety of subjects.

SACOG seeks advice from local agencies on

transportation and land use plan content,

and investment decisions. SACOG works

not only with the agency staff, but with

governing boards, technical committees

and advisory committees. These advisory

committees typically include representa-

tives of citizens’ advocacy groups, the pri-

vate sector, major colleges and universities,

transportation management professionals,

and private citizens unaffiliated with any

of the above groups. The Regional Bicycle

& Pedestrian Advisory Committee meets

quarterly and is made up of representatives

from local bicycle advocacy groups as well

as local government and nonprofit groups

involved in bikeway planning. More infor-

mation is available at sacog.org.

in 2012, the May is Bike Month

campaign introduced energizer

stations—places across the region

where bicyclists were encouraged

to sign up and log miles, and pick

up a Bike commute t-shirt, water,

and other goodies . the energizer

stations were so popular that

2013 brings more stations at more

locations . check out May is Bike

Month’s Facebook or twitter for

more information .

Over 5,000 residents around the

sacramento region participated in

MtP/scs planning workshops

co-chairs of the 2012 May is

Bike Month campaign, sacOG

Directors Joe Krovoza (Mayor

of city of Davis) and Phil serna

(sacramento county supervisor)

kicked-off BikeFest at the state

capitol .

May is Bike Month

May is Bike Month is an annual campaign organized by SACOG and championed by employ-ers, schools, cyclists, bike-friendly businesses, and others throughout the month of May. May is Bike Month encourages people to ride their bicycles for errands, recreation, and trips to work and school (and log their miles!). Beginning in 2004 with a “million mile” challenge to the re-gion, individuals, organizations, and schools challenged one another for the most miles bicycled throughout the month. To challenge cyclists in the Sacramento region, participants are now striving for a “Two Million Mile May.” The campaign includes a large event at the State Capitol, as well as numerous organized events and rides.

In 2012, 7,633 people in Sacramento, El Dorado, Placer, Sutter, Yolo and Yuba counties logged 1,750,620 bicycle miles. There was a 26 percent increase in miles and almost 30 per-cent increase in participants compared to the 2011 campaign. Participation is measured by the mileage logged on the mayisbikemonth.com website and by the number of people who attended more than 50 community bicycling events and 40 cycling safety education clinics. To log miles, find local events, and challenge yourself and others to bike more in May, sign up at mayisbikemonth.com.

The May is Bike Month campaign brings awareness to the issue of air quality in

the Sacramento region. out of the total trips made by bicycle, 32 percent (630,755

miles) were for errands, meetings and commuting, which are trip purposes

conventionally served by automobiles. That number of miles prevented 487,782

pounds of global-warming co2 and 303 pounds of Nitrogen oxides from entering

our atmosphere.4 cyclists also did not purchase at least 31,500 gallons of gasoline,

which at $3.50 a gallon saved approximately $110,000.5

4 SMAQMD

5 2012 May is Bike Month Final Report

The october Low-car challenge is a

campaign to encourage people to not

drive alone. To participate, sign up and

log on at sacregioncommuterclub.org

to earn points for logging trips by bike,

foot, transit, carpool, and vanpool.


Safe Routes to School

Safe Routes to School (SRTS) programs are designed to promote the health and well-be-ing of children by enabling and encouraging them to walk and bicycle to school. This pro-gram is effective because of the efforts made by parents, schools, community leaders and local, state, and federal government support to improve the safety and accessibility of sus-tainable ways of getting children to school. For more information visit: http://www.saferoutesinfo.org or http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/saferoutes/saferoutes.htm

The city of Lincoln is installing bike

lanes and constructing sidewalks

along major road E. joiner Parkway,

in addition to the installation of curbs

and gutters to add space for bicyclists

and pedestrians.

FIGURE 2Northside Bicycle Path Project

Proposed Project

CALIFORNIA

49

CALIFORNIA

193

Cool

Source: Google Maps, 2008

Cool

Legend

Retaining Wall

Drainage

Culvert

Project Alignment

in the community of cool in el Dorado county, the first segment of a multi-

use trail is getting constructed with safe routes to school funding to provide

continuous travel to el Dorado northside school .


Sacramento Region

32

SAcog support for Safe Routes to School

SACOG staff assist local agencies applying for funding and/or focused on implement-

ing related projects, by providing coordinated efforts with multiple partners, technical

support, including maps, data, letters, and other support. In 2012, SACOG joined the

National Safe Routes to School Partnership, co-hosted a regional workshop with the

Institute for Local Government, and adopted a Safe Routes policy. SACOG also serves as

coordinator for the WALKSacramento-led safe routes to school committee.

SACOG’s policy is to support environmentally sustainable, cost-effective, healthy, and

equitable transportation modes by promoting safe walking and bicycling to, from, and

around schools in the Sacramento region.

Strategies include:

• providing agencies with technical assistance on program and infrastructure planning along

with grant review and letters of support;

• sharing information with policymakers, partners, stakeholders, schools, and the public

about the importance of safe routes to school through SACOG’s Complete Streets Re-

source Toolkit and by hosting workshops and webinars;

• maintaining regional safe routes to school-related data (e.g. state and federally funded

Safe Routes projects, project proximity to K-12 schools, safety, bicycle facilities, census

information);

• encouraging bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure improvements in and around school

attendance boundaries through SACOG’s Regional Funding Programs; and

• facilitating development of broad-based partnerships by serving as a forum for community

partners, schools, and stakeholders.

continued Support & ResearchSACOG continues to support bicycle and pedestrian planning efforts and funding opportuni-ties by continuing to push the envelope with innovative modeling and planning tools, interac-tive community outreach, coordinated regional efforts, direct support to local agencies, and continuing to research, understand, and share valuable data and information. More information about SACOG’s efforts is available online at http://www.sacog.org.

in December, 2012, nearly 100

people involved in safe routes to

school efforts around the region

discussed regional coordination,

challenges, and opportunities at

the safe routes to school work-

shop . yolo county supervisor

Don saylor and city of Marysville

Mayor ricky samayoa were

among the featured speakers at

the workshop hosted by sacOG

in coordination with the institute

for local Governments .


Performance MeasuresMeasuring the improvements and expansion of the bicycle and pedestrian system in the Sacramento region is important to the long-term success of this plan. There are a variety of metrics that can be used, including:

• Change in miles of bikeways and sidewalks

• Change in usage

• Impact of bicycle and pedestrian investments on air quality, public health, and other quality of life indicators

The region is home to over 480 miles of multi-use paths, 1,100 miles of bike lanes,

and 300 miles of bike routes. The Master Plan proposes to greatly increase the

number of facilities in the region, including about 750 miles of multi-use paths,

1,500 miles of bike lanes, and 500 miles of bike routes.

Monitoring and Review

The collection of data can help evaluate what treatments are successful and what can be improved in an active transportation network. Data can also help justify pursuing needed improvements, and help projects secure competitive funding when funds are scarce. Funds can be allocated to measure the effectiveness of improvements made to the regional bicycle and pedestrian systems after projects have been completed, and may be included as part of the total project funding. The process used for these measurements is specific to each project and will be managed by the local jurisdictions.

SAcog collaboration with

university of california, Davis

In late 2010, SACOG received a Sustainable

Communities Regional Planning Grant to

help develop and implement the MTP/SCS.

The UC Davis Center for Regional Change is

a partner on this grant, working with SACOG

to develop two neighborhood indices: a

vulnerability index and an opportunity index.

These indices can be used to compare

the social equity characteristics of specific

neighborhoods to the region as a whole. A

central goal of both indices was to design

them in ways that could incorporate the

complex and multi-faceted nature of social

vulnerability and opportunity in the region,

while also providing decision makers with

an intuitive and quick way to identify neigh-

borhoods with high levels of social vulner-

abilities, and neighborhoods that showed

characteristics of high social and economic

opportunity. It was also important that the

indices be developed in a broad participa-

tory process to incorporate the wealth of

knowledge of social equity advocates in the

region, and to ensure that the final product

had broad public support.

The resulting vulnerability index and oppor-

tunity index, and the specific indicators that

comprised these indices, became impor-

tant tools in the case study area selection

process to investigate the implementation

of the MTP/SCS, and are now forming the

basis for on-going efforts to incorporate

social equity into neighborhood strategic

planning, in updates to the MTP/SCS, and in

developing a framework for tracking perfor-

mance in attaining social equity goals in the

long term.


Sacramento Region

34

Multi-Modal Level of Service (MMLoS)

Level of Service (LOS) is a rating systems used to evaluate the effectiveness of transportation facilities and services. The LOS rates facilities from A (best) to F (worst), and these ratings are used to evaluate problems and potential solutions. Historically, LOS has been used to evaluate motor vehicle speed, convenience, comfort and security. Recently the Transportation Research Board (TRB) developed an LOS method to assess how well an urban street meets the needs of all its users, including bicycle, pedestrian, and transit modes, called a multi-modal LOS (MMLOS) for urban streets. The MMLOS evaluation method estimates auto, bus, bicycle, and pedestrian level of service on an urban street using a combination of data. More information is available online at http://www.trb.org.

Sacramento county is also working to

establish LoS standards and desirable

thresholds for all modes of travel

including pedestrian, bicycle, and

transit.


PlanningThe integration of bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure into all transportation planning is a necessary step to achieve the region’s vision of a complete transportation system.

complete Streets

Complete streets are roadways that provide for the effective movement of all public right-of-way users. Complete streets do more than just provide facilities for pedestrians, bicycles, transit, and cars. They in-clude consideration of ADA accessibility, perceived comfort and safety of all users, quality of life, regional and local transportation demand, and goods movement. Complete Streets vary based on the area (i.e. urban, rural, or suburban) and the project location (e.g. downtown, residential, near schools or transit). SACOG is dedicated to assisting local governments throughout the region to make complete streets a regular part of the planning, design, construction, maintenance, and operations of roadway and transit facilities.

The MTP/SCS places a greater emphasis on increasing transportation choices for residents than previous SACOG MTPs. The multimodal strategies in the plan are supported by the greatest proportional fund-ing increase for bicycle and pedestrian projects compared to other modes, a robust transit system with greater coverage and more fre-quent service, and a regional complete streets policy.

SACOG, in coordination with the local Complete Streets Coalition, has developed a Complete Streets Resource Toolkit. The toolkit is a collection of valuable resources related to complete streets, and part of SACOG’s complete streets technical assistance program. For more information on Complete Streets, please visit the toolkit online at: http://www.sacog.org/complete-streets/toolkit/START.html

increased Access

Communities must be designed to enable safe and efficient travel for non-motorists. People are less likely to bicycle or walk if they are re-quired to take an indirect route, travel long distances out of their way, or feel unsafe or uncomfortable. Therefore, to reduce distances and travel times and to improve safety, it is important to provide bicycle and pedestrian access in areas where vehicle use is restricted or blocked, such as street closures and cul-de-sacs. Local agencies should coordi-nate with developers to maximize opportunities to provide bicycle and pedestrian friendly development patterns and infrastructure. Local agencies are also encouraged to improve access to transit by working with their local transit operators to improve bicycle parking and on-board bicycle storage, and develop a “safe routes to transit” program.


Sacramento Region

36

the city of Winters’ Grant avenue/state road 128/ russell Blvd . complete streets concept Plan presents a community-supported vision

for a more pedestrian and bicycle-friendly corridor that simultaneously supports a smooth automobile traffic flow . landscape buffers

between travel lanes and pedestrians, roundabouts, and signalized intersections are just some of the strategic enhancements that result

in a greater sense of safety and thereby increase access and attractiveness of walking and bicycling .

Ph

oT

o c

ou

rT

eSy

of

ciT

y o

f W

inT

er

SP

ho

To

co

ur

Te

Sy o

f c

iTy

of

Sac

ra

Me

nT

o c

ou

nT

y

the sacramento county Freedom Park Drive Project incorporates smart growth concepts through redevelopment of the Mcclellan air

Force base in north Highlands, sacramento . the focus is on adaptive reuse, infill development, and the creation of multi-modal trans-

portation options in an older inner-ring suburban area that has no town center or community focal point . the project will create more

consistent streetscapes, improve traffic circulation, and solve issues of pedestrian and bicycle safety as it strives to create a sense of com-

munity identity through integration of land use and transportation modes .


wayfinding

Wayfinding is a systematic way of providing consistent, clear, and user-friendly information about distances and routes to transit and other key destinations for bicyclists and pedestrians. An effective regional wayfinding system will be one that unites the region and enables visitors, first-time users, and residents to navigate safely to their destination. Regional wayfinding sys-tems serve the purpose of unifying the region in such a way that minimizes confusion for those who travel between and across different local jurisdictions.

A regional wayfinding system should establish a range of permitted functions for a signage system, but not restrict the creativity of local jurisdictions by determining a specific design or assigning locations for wayfinding signage. Many wayfinding systems for bicyclists follow the MUTCD guidelines, unless the agency responsible for the system accepts that the signs are for informational purposes rather than transportation purposes. At this time, there is no national standard for pedestrian wayfinding systems.

Wayfinding signage in roseville invites new bicyclists and walkers to use the trail

by providing information about where the trail leads and proper trail behavior .


Sacramento Region

38

understanding impactsThe impact of bicycle and pedestrian facilities goes beyond pavement marking and signage.

Safety

An important goal of this plan is to reduce bicyclist and pedestrian injury and fatality rates while increasing the frequency of bicycling and walking for transportation. The safety of bicyclists and pedestrians is greatly affected by supporting infrastructure and education for pedes-trians, bicyclists, and motorists. Road projects are encouraged to focus on maintaining bicycle and pedestrian facilities as well as promote more complete streets which will create consistent and convenient av-enues of travel for bicyclists and pedestrians.

It is important to incorporate bicycle and pedestrian needs in road-way design extending beyond bike lanes, sidewalks, and paths. Effec-tive planning also considers designing streets with narrower roadway widths, median refuge islands, lower traffic speeds, smaller corner radii, and vertical curbs, to name a few options. Planter strips, street trees, crosswalks with audible or countdown signals, and adequate light-ing also enhance the safety and comfort of bicycle and pedestrian envi-ronments.6

Pedestrians are injured and killed in much higher proportion to their trip making than travelers using other modes of transportation. In California pedestrians are involved in 3% of all collisions, but account

6 Dan Burden, Walkable Communities, Inc.

Bicycle and pedestrian traffic

signals, loop sensors, and push

buttons are ways technology can

reduce barriers by increasing the

convenience, time-efficiency,

and safety of people walking or

biking for transportation . this

pedestrian push button signal is

in the city of West sacramento .

yuba county’s effort to provide

comprehensive bicycle and pe-

destrian access via a loop around

the community includes install-

ing bike-lanes and sidewalks at

the south end of Powerline rd

near the community of Olive-

hurst . this project is a collective

effort, using safe routes to

school funding, sacOG regional

funding, and other sources .

Ph

oT

o c

ou

rT

eSy

of

yu

Ba

co

un

Ty

Pu

Bli

c W

or

kS

Bicycle and pedestrian traffic

signals, loop sensors, and push

buttons are ways technology can

reduce barriers by increasing the

convenience, time-efficiency,

and safety of people walking or

biking for transportation . this

pedestrian push button signal is

in the city of West sacramento .

yuba county’s effort to provide

comprehensive bicycle and pe-

destrian access via a loop around

the community includes install-

ing bike-lanes and sidewalks at

the south end of Powerline rd

near the community of Olive-

hurst . this project is a collective

effort, using safe routes to

school funding, sacOG regional

funding, and other sources .

for 22% of the traffic fatalities statewide.7 We can tackle these statistics and reduce the risk of injury and fatalities by educating our commu-nity, being aware and attentive to the multiple users of the transpor-tation system, and by continuously improving the environment for non-motorized transportation users.

The Caltrans Pedestrian Safety Task Force has set a goal of reducing pedestrian and bicyclist injuries by greater than 20% by 2018. To evaluate bicycle and pedestrian travel, and the level of satisfaction with the bicycle/pedestrian transportation mode Caltrans plans to conduct a market research survey in coordination with the Department of Health Service (DHS). The survey will be conducted on an annual basis to determine the level of improvement made in bicycle/pedes-trian travel, behavior, and satisfaction.8

The goals of this plan are also aggressive:

• To double the percentage of total trips made by bicycling and walk-ing in the Sacramento Region from 6.6%9 in 2000 to 13.2% of all trips by 2020.

• To reduce by at least 20% the number of bicyclists and pedestrians killed or injured in traffic crashes by 2020, based on year 2000 data as shown in tables A.5 – A.8 in Appendix A section 5.2

7 California Pedestrian Safety Task Force Report: Walking Towards a Brighter Future.

March 1999

8 Pedestrian Safety Task Force, March1999

9 Sacramento Area Council of Governments “2000 Sacramento Area Household Travel

Survey”

shoulders on rural roads increase

the space available for bicycle

transportation, resulting in a

greater sense of security and

comfort for bicyclists, as dem-

onstrated by this cyclist in Placer

county .


Public Health

Walkable and bikeable communities offer innumerable opportunities for residents to engage in physical activity. Many studies show a clear link between walking or bicycling to school or work and better intellectual performance and readiness. However, the perception of unsafe conditions, such as presence of crime or inadequate pedestrian facilities, can deter residents from choosing to walk to their destination. It is crucial that as we look forward we continue to support development that is safe and inviting for all residents of any ability and provides the opportunity to incorporate physical activity into their daily routine. Many communities must address past poor land use decisions and lack of transportation options that act as barriers to healthy lifestyles.

Although public health is a multifaceted issue that has endless determinants, most of which are solely controlled by the individual, as planners we can target funds towards built environment characteristics that have shown to increase the opportunities for residents to engage in physical activity. Some attributes of the built environment that have been associated with higher levels of physical activity are: complete streets, access to transit, mixed use communities, well-kept in-frastructure, lighting, and aesthetically pleasing landscape to name a few. This is also an issue of social equity, as studies show an increase in walking and bicycling mode share reduces residents’ exposure to toxic air contaminants and improves air quality for the whole community.

Increasing the quantity of supportive infrastructure is essential to supporting bicycle and pe-destrian travel. Because inactivity is a significant factor in obesity and many diseases, creating opportunities for people to incorporate walking and biking into everyday travel is important to improving public health. According to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, 55 percent of U.S. adults do not meet recommended activity guidelines, and approximately 25 percent report being completely inactive.10 One study found that 43 percent of people with safe places to walk within 10 minutes of home met recommended activity levels; and that only 27 percent of people without safe places to walk met the recommendation. Another found that residents in neighborhoods with sidewalks are 65 percent more likely to walk.11

10 National Complete Streets Coalition,

http://www.sacog.org/complete-streets/toolkit/files/docs/NCSC_CS%20Promote%20Good%20Health.pdf

11 Metropolitan Transportation Plan/ Sustainable Communities Strategy 2012

Riding in the Delta

The city of Isleton, located along the Sacra-

mento River, is an integral part of the Delta

Protection Commission’s significant effort

to develop a connected trail system through

the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta.

In 2006, California Senate Bill 1556 (Torlak-

son) was signed by the Governor, express-

ing support for the effort to link Bay Area

trails and planned Sacramento River trails

in Yolo and Sacramento counties to pres-

ent and future trails in and around the Delta,

including Delta shorelines in Contra Costa,

San Joaquin, Solano, Sacramento, and Yolo

counties.

Source: Delta Protection Commission

Recreational Riding

Many foothill and rural communities in the

region—including the smaller cities of Au-

burn, Colfax, and Loomis in Placer County—

are hubs for bicycling groups to ride or meet

to race on weekends. These activities sup-

port local businesses, such as restaurants

and hotels, help foster new industries, like

bike repair and retail shops, and spur addi-

tional opportunities, such as participating in

large, highly publicized events. The Sacra-

mento region has been a part of the Amgen

Tour of California route for five of the six

Amgen races.

Ph

oT

o c

ou

rT

eSy

of

ed

cT

c

Multi-use trails provide many

health benefits for people of all

ages and abilities .


Sacramento Region

40

Economic indicators

Bicycle and pedestrian facilities not only improve quality of life, but also create a more attractive place to live and do business. Many areas have prospered after integrating pedestrian and bicycle facilities into their communities, including property values going up, tourism increasing, cor-porations relocating to communities with a bicycle and pedestrian network, and new businesses sprouting up near the route. Success of bicycle and pedestrian projects can be measured by each of these economic indicators.

In August, 2012 WALKSacramento used walkscore.com (a tool that rates communities based upon walkability measures such as close locations of key destinations) to help identify walk-able communities in the City of Sacramento. In combination with real estate data from zillow.com the study looked at correlations between home values and walkability scores between the years of 2005 and 2010. The findings supported previous studies that walkable neighborhoods retain home values more so than non-walkable neighborhoods. (source: www.walksacramento.org/2012/08/walk-toward-economic-stability-research-on-walkability-and-home-values-in-Sacramento/ )

Tourism

Tourism creates a substantial economic impact for many communities, especially in Cali-

fornia— and bicycle tourism represents a growing market. El Dorado County Transportation

Commission is leading a collaborative effort in partnership with Caltrans District 3, and the

Nevada, Amador, and Placer County Transportation Planning Agencies to identify and analyze

the impacts to the rural roadway system from the recreation and tourism-related traffic in

their Bay to Tahoe Basin: Recreation and Tourism Rural Roadway Impact Study.

New Development

State and local jurisdiction agencies should consider adopting ordinances requiring developers and employers to provide secure bicycle parking and other support facilities such as showers and lockers at government buildings, commercial developments and employment sites.

Ph

oT

o c

ou

rT

eSy

of

ed

cT

c

Transportation & Health

Health studies focusing on transportation,

air quality and physical activity suggest nu-

merous health benefits of walking and bik-

ing. The Health Co-Benefits and Transpor-

tation-Related Reductions in Greenhouse

Gas Emissions in the Bay Area study found

a 15% reduction in deaths and years of life

lost to heart disease, stroke, and diabetes

when 15% of car miles traveled are replaced

with walking and biking. The Air Quality and

Exercise-Related Health Benefits from Re-

duced Car Travel in the Midwestern United

States proposes that replacing trips less than

five miles with walking and biking can save

$3.8 billion a year in avoided mortality and

health care costs. For more information, visit

www.cdph.ca.gov

Phase i of the live Oak commu-

nity trail converted an abandoned

rail corridor into a bicycle and

pedestrian facility serving Down-

town live Oak and surrounding

neighborhoods .

the el Dorado trail currently

extends from the western el

Dorado county line to the camino

area just east of Placerville . the

ultimate vision is for it to extend

all the way to lake tahoe .


EducationEducation programs are vital to an efficient and safe bicycling and pedestrian-supportive environment. Bicyclists, pedestrians, and motorists need to understand how to travel safely and be cognizant of other roadway users.

Pedestrian Education

Pedestrian education programs should emphasize safety guidelines such as the value of crossing at intersections or crosswalks, and walking on the proper side of the street as defined in the California Vehicle Code; “When sidewalks are not available pedestrians are required to walk on the left-hand edge of the road facing traffic.” This definition also applies to the safe usages of multi-use (class I) trails. Programs designed for children can increase their awareness of motor vehicles and teach appropriate behavior in the vicinity of traffic. Elementary and high school students should develop and learn a “Suggested Route to School Plan,” as well as gain instruc-tion on pedestrian safety.12

Bicyclist Education

Bicyclist education should focus on preventing crashes and injuries. Programs should outline important safety techniques when bicycling; for example, riding with traffic, equipping bicycles with lights and reflectors, and wearing bright reflective clothing for increased visibility at night. Instruction about the California Vehicle Code is also important, emphasizing that bicyclists have the same duties and responsibilities, and must follow the same rules as drivers of cars such as bicycling the same direction as traffic. Likewise the programs should highlight the California law regarding youth bicycle helmet requirements.

12 Pedestrian Safety Task Force, March 1999

knowing the rules of the road (and how

they apply to bicyclists) is an important

step for anyone wanting to make the

shift from riding recreationally to

riding for transportation purposes.

The Tour de Lincoln started in 2002 and

is an annual recreational ride between

the cities of Lincoln and Auburn that

encourages learning more about

biking in Lincoln and surrounding

areas. Educational materials about the

Tour de Lincoln, includes information

on bicycle safety and sharing the

road with motor vehicles, a map of

bike facilities in Lincoln, and options

for finding bike commuting buddies.

More information is available at

http://www.tourdelincoln.org

to maximize the use of multi-

purpose trails, there must be a

way to cross barriers dividing

trail segments . People traveling

between residential areas and Galt

community Park or the river Oaks

elementary school can activate a

flashing beacon to alert oncoming

traffic that people are crossing

the road .


Sacramento Region

42

Motorist Education

Programs developed for drivers should address subjects like bicyclist and pedestrian right of way, awareness of children walking to schools and playgrounds, and safe driving speeds in and around schools and neighborhoods. These issues can be addressed in curriculum included in drivers’ education programs and the Department of Motor Vehicles Traffic Violators’ School. These programs could be developed in conjunction with the Department of Motor Vehicles, Caltrans, California Highway Patrol, Office of Traffic Safety, and other private organizations.

Professional Education

Engineers, planners, developers and elected officials often influence how land is used. Therefore it is important that professionals are well trained, and understand the important role bicycle and pedestrian facilities play in efficient transportation systems. Integrating bicycle and pedestrian issues into mainstream engineering, landscape architecture, and planning education programs can improve awareness of the significance of bicycling and walking. Curricula for transportation and land use must present walking and bicycling as normal, expected, efficient, and desirable modes. Organizations such as the Association of Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals (APBP) can also encourage practitioners to improve their technical skills by encouraging continuing education for professionals in related fields. Likewise licensing boards for transportation and trails professionals should review training and education needs and make appropriate recom-mendations.


Transit connectionsMany Sacramento region residents walk or bicycle for some of their travel. The majority of trips are a short distance—five miles or less—a length bikeable or walkable for many people. increasing the quantity and improving the quality of supportive infrastructure is essential to supporting bicycle and pedestrian travel. Transit connections encompass everything between a resident and his/her final destination, which infers the importance of a complete network of sidewalks, bicycle lanes, or multi-use trails.

Safe Routes to Transit

Safe Routes to Transit, an effort to increase

the number of people who can safely and

conveniently walk or bicycle to transit stops

and stations through a variety of improve-

ments to the surrounding infrastructure and

stops/stations themselves, is a priority for

the region. These cost-effective methods

for increasing transit ridership benefit all

users of the transportation station. Promot-

ing projects in and around transit is one of

SACOG’s short-term funding priorities for

the Bicycle and Pedestrian Funding Pro-

gram. By creating safe facilities and an invit-

ing environment for people to walk and bike

to transit, more people can choose to leave

their cars at home. In 2006, SACOG studied

bicycle access to light rail and determined

that improving and promoting bike access

to transit stations would dramatically in-

crease the pool of transit riders and provide

a variety of community benefits. The full re-

port can be found at sacog.org.

People riding light rail have the option of parking their bike at the station or bringing

it on board . On the older light rail trains, riders place their bikes in the rear or front of

the car next to the flip-up seats . However, the new light rail trains are equipped with

four bike racks in each car .


Sacramento Region

44

current Transit Service

Transit in the Sacramento region currently encompasses a wide array of services, including urban light rail and bus services; suburban and rural local and commuter bus service; rural lifeline services, often running on limited frequencies; dial-a-ride/paratransit services for seniors and persons with disabilities; and gap-filling social service transportation provided largely by non-profits and volunteers. Additionally, interregional rail and bus services facilitate long dis-tance trips into and out of the region.

Intercity passenger rail service also serves as part of the Sacramento region’s transportation sys-tem, linking passengers to cities within the region as well as other parts of the state and nation. In California, Amtrak operates all state-supported intercity rail service. More information about Amtrak is available in Appendix D.

Bikes on Buses

Many transit operators in the region use

racks for two bicycles on their buses. Re-

cently, Yolobus converted all racks to hold

three bicycles, and in 2012, Sacramento

Regional Transit was awarded $331,000 to

purchase 250 bicycle racks with capacity

to hold three bicycles each. Providing these

multi-modal support facilities allows resi-

dents to make the last mile of their trip.

People often walk or bike to transit, and need infra-

structure to safely and conveniently make the trip .

By increasing the number of bikes

that can be carried on the bus,

sacramento rt will be able to

accommodate more multimodal

trips and expand their “transit

catchment area”, or the area

around a transit stop from which

riders will walk or bike to catch a

bus or light rail train .


Bicycle racks at the capitol corri-

dor station in city of Davis provide

people with the ability to ride

their bikes to the train, but travel

without bringing their bicycles .

ensuring multi-modal facilities are

available at end-of-trip locations

is important for encouraging

people to make their trip without

a vehicle .

Multi-Modal improvements

Pedestrian and bicycle access also affects the effectiveness and efficiency of transit service, as most transit trips involve walking or cycling at one or both ends. Studies show that commuters are more likely to take transit if they can easily walk or bike from their home or worksite to a transit stop or station. As a result, walking and cycling infrastructure improvements can be an effective way to support transit use. Good intermodal connections, such as convenient park-and-ride locations, on-board bike racks, secure bicycle parking, safe and pleasant access routes, and short-cuts can enhance the appeal of both non-motorized and transit modes.

Bicycle facilities at Light Rail Stations and Transit connections

According to the 1995 National Personal Transportation Survey, approximately 63% of all people nationwide live 2 miles or less from public transportation.13 A key instrument to encour-aging higher levels of bicycling is a public transportation system that accommodates bicyclists’ needs. Within the Sacramento area there are 14 different transit agencies and many of these agencies have active bicycle programs and strongly support the use of multi-modal transporta-tion options.

The majority of the transit agencies in the Sacramento region are attempting to make transit more bicycle friendly by providing more opportunities for people to combine biking and transit trips by providing bicycle racks on buses and secure bike parking. When commuting on the Sacramento RT light rail system a maximum of four bikes are allowed inside each light rail car, and over 150 outdoor bicycle lockers are provided at 15 light rail stations, and can be rented out for a nominal fee. Most local and commuter routes provide bicycle racks for two to three bicycles. Refer to Appendix D for specific transportation agency contact information.

13 1995 National Personal Transportation Survey: http://www-cta.ornl.gov/npts/1995/doc/index.shtml

Ph

oT

o c

ou

rT

eSy

of

er

ic f

re

de

ric

kS

folsom Pedal Stop

The Folsom Pedal Stop provides long-term

bike parking near a popular light rail station.

There are 60 bike parking spots in the Pedal

Stop, utilizing two-tier racks; electronic ac-

cess cards to use the Pedal Stop are sold at

local bike shops and online. The City also

has e-lockers (accessible through the same

electronic access card) at each of the three

light rail stations in Folsom, and is making

strides towards an on-demand bike locker

system to replace the conventional bike

locker rental process.

the Folsom Pedal stop is located

in Historic Folsom in a parking

garage near the light rail station . P

ho

To

co

ur

Te

Sy o

f c

iTy

of

folS

oM


Sacramento Region

46

Americans with Disabilities Act

About 50–60 percent of existing roads in the urbanized areas have no sidewalks, most com-monly in suburban areas that were not built as large subdivisions. This share is even higher in rural areas. The federal Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) mandates that disabled persons must be able to access the transportation system, including streets, roads and walkways. Under the ADA, public agencies are required to prepare transition plans showing how they intend to provide for this access. Planning and implementing projects takes considerable resources, and plans have been completed by the cities of Sacramento, Citrus Heights, Galt, and Rancho Cordova, and the counties of Sacramento and El Dorado, among others. The plans include a schedule for projects, such as providing curb ramps at intersections and access improvements on public walkways; and jurisdictions are gradually funding and building projects to implement their plans. Refer to Appendix D for more transit information.

connect card

The Connect Transit Card (“Connect Card”) is a key component of a comprehensive plan to completely transform the customer experience using transit in the Sacramento region. The regional, electronic bus and light rail fare card will allow users to purchase fares in advance, seamlessly pay varying bus and light rail fares, and easily transfer between transit systems using the single Connect Card. Customers will be able to reload their cards online, at select light rail stations and retail outlets, or at transit agencies. Riders will have the option to register their card, which will provide balance protection in the event their card is lost or stolen. Customers simply tap their card to pay for fare as they board the bus or light rail, connecting people to transit throughout the region.

The Connect Card system will be a powerful new tool to encourage new and more transit rider-ship, convenience, and efficiency throughout the region.

Participating Transit Operators:

• Sacramento Regional Transit

• El Dorado Transit

• Elk Grove’s e-Tran

• Folsom Stage Lines

• Roseville Transit

• Yolobus

• Yuba-Sutter Transit

the city of West sacramento and

yolo county transportation Dis-

trict (yctD) partnered to build this

high-performing transit center

along West capitol avenue . the

transit center was partially funded

through sacOG’s community

Design grant program .

Ph

oT

o c

ou

rT

eSy

of

yc

Td


Supporting infrastructure and ProgramsProviding supporting infrastructure for end-of-trip needs, including secure bicycle racks, cages, lockers, showers, and changing rooms, is extremely important for facilitating bicycle travel. Local agency plans identify existing and proposed support facilities, focusing investments on popular trip destinations, such as employment centers, schools, public buildings, and local businesses (shopping, restaurants, and entertainment).

Secure and convenient Parking at Destinations

Secure bicycle parking is a key factor in deterring opportunistic and organized bicycle theft. This includes providing secure bicycle parking at destinations bicyclists are likely to visit, including but not limited to schools, commercial and employment centers, public buildings, recreational facilities, park-and-ride lots, and public transportation stops and stations.

If bicycling is to retain its inherent advantages, it is essential that cyclists are able to lock their bicycles at the most convenient location, usually immediately adjacent to their destination. If the bicycle will be parked for several hours, a bike locker or other means of long-term bike parking facilities—such as bicycle racks in an enclosed, weather protected area—are desirable.

When adding, changing or improving bicycle storage it is valuable to consult local cyclists to be sure their needs are met. Bicycle parking facilities must be coordinated with the needs of the user if they are to be well utilized. Long-term and short-term users require different storage facilities, site location requirements, and other supportive infrastructure. It is also important to locate bicycle parking where it does not conflict with vehicular traffic or pedestrian movement.

a variety of bike parking rack

designs can add character to a

community while also serving a

utilitarian purpose .

Bike/ped bridges provide connec-

tions between bicycle lanes, trails,

sidewalks, and transit .

Ph

oT

o c

ou

rT

eSy

of

er

ic f

re

de

ric

kS

Ph

oT

o c

ou

rT

eSy

of

ciT

y o

f fo

lSo

M

this bike corral at Pangaea two

Brews cafe, a locally-owned cafe

bridging curtis Park and Oak

Park, is part of a demonstration

program to test bike corrals in the

city of sacramento .

converting vehicle Parking Spaces

A growing number of cities are converting

vehicle parking spaces into bicycle parking

spaces. This type of facility can dedicate

more space for bicycle parking to accom-

modate high demand or to free up limited

sidewalk space where bicycle parking could

obstruct pedestrian movement.


Sacramento Region

48

Technology and innovation

Additionally, the region is looking at ways to support bicycling through technology and innova-tive programs.

online Bicycle Trip Planner

SACOG, in coordination with the Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory Committee, de-veloped a Sacramento-Region online bicycle trip planner in 2010, and update it on an annual basis. The trip planner may route users onto roadways that are identified by local bicyclists, advocacy groups, and/or public agencies as a useful bicycle route and/or bicycle connector. The route may be shared with motor vehicle traffic, has no bikeway designation or upgrades, have high speed vehicle traffic, varying shoulder widths, and challenging climbs. The trip planner is available at: http://www.sacregion511.org/bicycling/trips

the city of sacramento and the

sacramento Metropolitan air

Quality Management District are

both working with local busi-

nesses throughout sacramento

(city and county, respectively) to

install bicycle racks at popular

destinations for little to no charge

to businesses . Providing end-of-

trip infrastructure encourages

bicycling for utilitarian trips by

ensuring a dedicated place for

bike parking . these racks can

be found throughout the city of

sacramento at a variety of local

businesses, shopping, and enter-

tainment venues .

Ph

oT

o c

ou

rT

eSy

of

ciT

y o

f Sa

cr

aM

en

To

Stress Mapping

For a bicycle network to appeal to most po-

tential users, it needs to provide routes that

are fairly low-stress and also somewhat di-

rect. The Mineta Transportation Institute has

developed criteria to determine the Level of

Traffic Stress (LTS) on an existing or planned

bikeway network. The “LTS” category distin-

guishes four types of roadway segments on

a scale of 1 to 4, with 1 being suitable for

children and 4 being suitable for advanced

“fearless” riders. By coding the bikeway net-

work by user type instead of facility type,

jurisdictions can determine how to improve

the connectivity for the most users by iden-

tifying and prioritizing a continuous low-

stress network.

Bike Share Program

Bicycle sharing is an innovative and clever way to create public access to cycling as a form of sustainable transportation that supports clean air and public health, and reduces wear on public streets. By publicizing such a system this form of transportation becomes a viable and conve-nient option for area residents. The Sacramento region’s relatively flat topography and moderate weather make cycling an attractive and comfortable form of transportation intriguing for resi-dents and tourists alike. The growing interest in bike share programs nationally has resulted in the development of a sophisticated software system that is easy to use and lends great potential for the Sacramento region.

To learn more go to: http://www.bicyclinginfo.org/promote/bikeshare.cfm?/bikeshare


9PLANNiNg AND DESigN

The State Streets and Highways code, chapter 8 section 891, requires that local agencies must comply with design criteria set forth in chapter 1000 of the caltrans Highway Design Manual Bikeway Planning and Design. These shall govern design standards for all new bicycle projects. for all new pedestrian projects, locally adopted pedestrian design standards shall govern. if specific pedestrian design guidelines have not been adopted, the city of Sacramento’s Pedestrian Safety guidelines shall govern. Additionally, the Sacramento Transportation and Air Quality collaborative’s Best Practices for Bicycle and Pedestrian facility Planning and Design and Best Practices for complete Streets, AASHTo’s guide for the Development of Bicycle facilities, and fHwA’s Design guidance for Accommodating Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel, and Pedestrian facilities users guide — Providing Safety and Mobility are also useful references for the planning and design of bicycle and pedestrian facilities.

the Hazel bike/ped bridge over

Highway 50 offers connections for

pedestrians and cyclists across a

significant regional barrier .

Ph

oT

o c

ou

rT

eSy

of

da

ve

ca

SSe

l


Sacramento Region

50

Pedestrian facilities

Pedestrian facilities include multi-use paths, sidewalks, crosswalks, walkways, stairs, ramps, and building entrance ways. Sidewalks and walkways between homes within residential areas com-prise the majority of pedestrian facilities within most communities in the Sacramento region. Many of the pedestrian walkways that were once included in subdivisions have been abandoned because of crime or the lack of connectivity with other pedestrian facilities.14 The original intent of these walkways may have been lost over time with the development of subdivisions that do not include pedestrian amenities.

Multi-use paths (class I facilities) are facilities designed to accommodate pedestrians, bicyclists, and other individuals using non-motorized transportation. These facilities are provided as alter-natives to sidewalks or on-street bicycle lanes. Multi-use paths can be provided along existing vehicular facilities or designed to link important destinations without being within or adjacent to public motor vehicle facilities.

14 County of Sacramento Department of Transportation, “Pedestrian Master Plan – Draft Existing Conditions Discussion

Paper,” March 10, 2003

Ph

oT

o c

ou

rT

eSy

of

Th

e c

iTy

of

ro

Sev

ille

Pedestrian treatments in Down-

town roseville encourage more

walking and biking to this popular

area .

Street and intersection crossings

Safe and convenient street crossings are essential for bicycle and pedestrian travel. When pedes-trians must travel substantial distances out of their way to use a controlled intersection, there is an increase in jaywalking, which increases the risk of pedestrian/vehicle collisions. On multilane roads, long crossing distances also increase the potential for bicycle or pedestrian/vehicle colli-sions. Therefore it is important to design intersections that are safe for bicyclists and pedestrians of all ages and abilities to cross the road, with safe crossings at convenient intervals.

The following measures can improve the safety of street and intersection crossings:

• Traffic signals, and signal timing to enable safe crossings

• Signal detection for bicycles

• Advance signing and other devices that alert drivers to pedestrian crossings

• Enhanced crosswalk facilities, with textured and/or raised surfaces, and pedestrian activated signals

• Curb extensions that improve the visibility of pedestrians, and reduce crossing distances

• Pedestrian refuge islands and medians

• Crossings on all four legs of an intersection

• Implement intersection crossing guidelines consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act

Bold markings in the city of elk

Grove help people safely cross to

a busy street .

Ph

oT

o c

ou

rT

eSy

of

er

ic f

re

de

ric

kS


Sidewalks

To maximize pedestrian mobility, there must be a safe place to walk, preferably on both sides of the street. Pedestrians walk on the side of the street that is most advantageous to them in terms of time, comfort, and convenience. Gaps in sidewalks can lengthen walking trips, which often is the deciding factor in choosing not to walk. Meandering sidewalks are aesthetically pleasing, but they increase the distance pedestrians must walk to reach his/her destination, and therefore are not suitable for walking trips made for utilitarian purposes. Suggested sidewalk widths are 5´ minimum, with 8´ minimum in front of schools. Sidewalks must not be placed directly adjacent to a high-speed travel lane (design speed 45 MPH and above). A buffer area between traffic and pedestrians can significantly improve the safety of sidewalks. Acceptable buffers include a plant-ing strip, a shoulder barrier, a parking lane or a bike lane. Buffers are also beneficial on lower speed facilities.

Sidewalks are often included in some roadway improvement projects to help fill sidewalk gaps. Sidewalk improvements depend on the density of the residential area, and may not be required in some cases (e.g. in a one-house-per-acre subdivision).15 Many residents in the rural portions of the region prefer to have roadways that reflect a more rural setting, that is, without curbs, gut-ter, and sidewalks. For that reason sidewalks often are not constructed in rural areas.16 Regardless of these policies, a priority should be placed on providing safe and convenient pedestrian and bicycle facilities and connections, and meeting the needs of individuals who are disabled or visually impaired.

The width of sidewalks varies depending on the adjacent land uses. In rural areas, multi-purpose shoulders may be constructed as an interim condition. When the adjacent land is developed, bike lanes and sidewalk installations may be included as part of these projects.

15 Ibid

16 Ibid

sidewalks and crosswalks in

residential areas, such as here in

the city of rocklin, allow residents

to walk to nearby shopping, res-

taurants, employment, and parks,

as well as to get exercise while

enjoying their neighborhood .

New guidelines

The National Association of City Transpor-

tation Officials (NACTO) and the Associa-

tion of Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals

(APBP) have created innovative new guide-

lines to broaden the information available

when designing bikeways and bicycle sup-

port facilities.

NACTO Urban Bikeway Design Guide in-

cludes design guidance for a standardized

set of treatments for bikeway facilities, many

of which are already permitted through the

California Manual on Uniform Traffic Con-

trol Devices.

APBP’s Bike Parking Guidelines highlight

best practices from cities across the nation

to provide guidance on short- and long-

term bike parking, maintenance, sample

quantity requirements for bicycle parking

specific to types of land use, sample installa-

tion diagrams, and other useful information.


Sacramento Region

52

Principles for Pedestrian Design17

• The pedestrian environment should be safe and attractive

• The pedestrian network should be accessible to all

• The pedestrian network should connect to places people want to go

• The pedestrian environment should be easy to use

• The pedestrian environment should provide good places to rest

• The pedestrian environment should be used for many things

• The pedestrian environment should be economical

17 Pedestrian Transportation Program, City of Portland, “Pedestrian Master Plan” 1998the r street corridor is a 27-block

long, 2-block wide area in transi-

tion—this transit-oriented-devel-

opment planning project is part of

the city of sacramento’s effort to

transform the area into a vibrant,

transit and pedestrian-friendly

urban center . Between 10th and

15th streets, completed projects

include rehabilitated roads, side-

walks, lighting, benches, and pub-

lic art . Popular local restaurants

and mixed use developments are

helping spark economic develop-

ment throughout the corridor .

Bicycle facilities18

Bikeway spacing and types of facilities provided are important in the development of a regional bikeway system. The ideal system would be one where all the roadways are accessible and safe for all users and are designed based on “Complete Streets” concepts. However this is not always possible or practical, and outlying areas may see bikeways spaced at 1-1/2 to 2 miles apart. All streets that serve as radial feeders to the central business district or major employment centers are prime candidates for inclusion as bikeways, regardless of distance between the feeders. Specific design standards are available in Chapter 1000 (Bikeway Planning and Design) of the Caltrans Highway Design Manual.

18 The 2010 Sacramento City/County Bikeway Master Plan, November 1993 Widened shoulders on rural roads

allow bicycling to serve as a safe

and convenient transportation

option for residents living in or

traveling through rural areas .


Multi-use Paths (class i Bikeways)

A path physically separated from motor vehicle traffic by an open space or barrier and either within a highway right-of-way or within an independent right-of-way, used by bicyclists, pedes-trians, joggers, skater and other non-motorized travelers. Multi-use paths are the most popular type of facility. Because the availability of uninterrupted rights-of-way is limited, this type of facility may be difficult to locate and expensive to build relative to other types bicycle and pedestrian facilities, but inexpensive compared to new roadways. Prime locations for bike paths are areas such as power-line easements, utility easements, canal banks, river levees, drainage easements, railroad or highway rights-of-way, or regional community parks.

GraPhicS courTeSy of SacraMenTo TranSPorTaTion

& air QualiTy collaBoraTive

Bike Lanes (class ii Bikeways)

A portion of a roadway that has been set aside by striping and pavement markings for the preferential or exclusive use of bicyclists. Bike lanes are intended to promote an orderly flow of bicycle and vehicle traffic. This type of facility is established by using the appropriate striping, legends, and signs.


Sacramento Region

54

Bike Routes (class iii Bikeways)

Bike routes are facilities shared with motor vehicle traffic. Bike routes must be of benefit to the bicyclist and offer a higher degree of service than adjacent streets. They provide for specific bicy-cle demand and may be used to connect discontinuous segments of bike lane streets. Also, bike routes are located on residential streets, and rural roads. If the pavement width is sufficient and traffic volume/speeds warrant, an edge line may be painted to further delineate the bike route. Bike routes are signed with the G-93 Bike Route marker, but no striping or legends are required.

Additional facility information

Lighting19

Security for active transportation requires attention to design details such as trail, path, and side-walk lighting. Lighting is important for safe, comfortable bicycle and pedestrian travel. Inad-equate or non-existent lighting may discourage potential bicycling or walking trips, and increase concerns about the potential for criminal activity. Adequate lighting illuminates walkways and impediments, such as uneven surfaces or debris, improves safety, and therefore is an essential component of bicycle and pedestrian facilities.

Landscaping20

Trees are an important amenity that enhances the bicycle and pedestrian environment. They are a necessity in the Sacramento region where hot weather is common many months of the year, and trees should be selected to provide shade. Landscaping also increases roadway safety by providing a buffer between traffic and pedestrians, and may cause motorists to slow down. It has also been shown that landscaping helps increase pavement life, and contributes to improve-ments in air and water pollution. When landscaping is included, it should be open and airy to promote good visibility.

connectivity21

In many areas in the Sacramento region, bicycling or walking to schools, employment centers, shopping centers, or other activity centers can be challenging. While distances may be short,

19 California Blueprint for Bicycling and Walking. May 2002

20 Ibid

21 Ibid

Pedestrian facilities such as the

wide sidewalks, street furniture,

and outdoor seating, as shown

here in the city of Woodland, can

create a pleasant environment that

encourages walking .


the route may require traveling on a roadway that is unsuitable for bicyclists or pedestrians, or accessing the facility through a large parking lot. Unfortunately this situation is all too common, and discourages the use of bicycles or walking.

To improve connectivity in communities, it is essential to consider bicycling and pedestrian travel in all transportation and development projects. Circulation studies investigating potential access routes and crossings to adequately accommodate bicyclists and pedestrians gather impor-tant information for project implementation. Programs that offer incentives to retrofit existing suburban and urban neighborhoods can also lead to increased connectivity.

Neighborhoods should be planned in a way that is conducive to walking and biking. Studies have shown that distances less than or equal to one-half mile are the most acceptable to pedes-trians.22 Street crossings must also be convenient. Pedestrians do not want to go more than 150 feet out of their way to cross a street.23 With fewer available crossings people are more likely to cross sporadically or spontaneously, creating an unsafe environment for both pedestrians and motorists. Therefore cul-de-sacs and gated or walled communities should be discouraged, unless they include convenient bicycle and pedestrian connections. Well-designed streets should have convenient pedestrian crossings every 300 feet.24

Motor-vehicle Speeds and Traffic calming

Arterial roadways in California are planned to minimize driving time, particularly during con-gested commute periods. While increasing peak-hour capacity offers benefits to motorists, ex-panded roadways may lead to higher motor-vehicle speeds, which are less desirable for bicyclists and pedestrians.

Roadways should be designed for their optimum and safe speed consistent with the location and functional classification, and design speed should be based on the safety of pedestrians and bicyclists. Excessive speed is the cause of many serious traffic collisions involving bicyclists and pedestrians. It is important to minimize excessive speed and incorporate traffic-calming methods for urban/main street arterial traffic. Traffic-calming is the combination of primarily physical measures that reduce the negative effects of motor-vehicle use, alter driver behavior, and improve conditions for non-motorized street users.25 Traffic calming measures create a safe and comfortable environment for all users by slowing motor-vehicle speed, and reducing cut-through motor-vehicle traffic, thus reducing collision frequency and severity.26 These measures also increase access for pedestrians and bicyclists.

The four main types of measures are:

• Vertical deflections

• Horizontal shifts

• Roadway narrowings

• Closures

22 Ibid

23 Ibid

24 Ibid

25 Lockwood, Ian. ITE Traffic Calming Definition. ITE Journal, July 1997, pg. 22.

26 Ibid

Ph

oT

o c

ou

rT

eSy

of

SuT

Te

r c

ou

nT

y

a commuter arrives in Downtown

sacramento using the sacramento

northern Bikeway .

Bike lanes with clear markings that

are free from debris offer bicyclists

transportation options on a busy,

rural road in sutter county .


Sacramento Region

56

The traffic calming measures are intended to reduce speed and enhance the street environment for non-motorists. Examples of these include speed humps, traffic circles, and center island narrowing.27 Closures, such as diagonal diverters, half closures, full closures, and median barri-ers, are intended to reduce cut-through traffic by obstructing traffic movements in one or more directions.28 Traffic calming measures should be implemented with consultation of public transit and emergency service providers to minimize impacts on access and services.

27 Institute of Transportation Engineers Traffic Calming Website, http://www.ite.org/traffic

28 Ibid

the city of sacramento recently undertook a significant complete streets effort . Projects included road diets — converting three lane

roads to two lane roads with bicycle lanes — converting one-way roads to two-way roads, adding and widening sidewalks and improving

street crossings . in Downtown sacramento, n street was one street that received a “road diet .”

Ph

oT

o c

ou

rT

eSy

of

To

Wn

of

loo

MiS

a steamroller puts the final touch

on a multi-use path parallel to

taylor road in loomis . the path

connects the multi-modal transit

center and Downtown loomis

with the bike lanes on sierra col-

lege Blvd .

Ph

oT

o c

ou

rT

eSy

of

er

ic f

re

de

ric

kS.


Ph

oT

o c

ou

rT

eSy

of

To

Wn

of

loo

MiS

A.1APPENDix

BAckgRouND AND SuPPoRTiNg iNfoRMATioN

A.1 who Bicycles and walks Now?The population of the six-county Sacramento region in 2010 was 2,316,019, and is expected to grow to 3,086,213 by 2035.29 The U.S. Census “journey to work” data in Table A.1 indicates that in the Sac-ramento region 2.0% of commuters walked to work, and 2.8% used other means, which includes bicycling; compared to statewide percent-ages of 2.8% and 2.3% respectively. Table A.2 shows this data for each of the six counties in the Sacramento region.

29 Sacramento Area Council of Governments, 2011

Table A.1 commuting to work

sacraMentO reGiOn caliFOrnia

TOTAL % TOTAL %

WORKERS 16 YEARS AND OVER 990,009 100.00% 16,251,032 100.00%

CAR, TRUCK, OR VAN — DROVE ALONE 744,207 75.20% 11,866,492 73.00%

CAR, TRUCK, OR VAN — CARPOOLED 119,934 12.10% 1,899,937 11.70%

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION (INCLUDING TAxICAB) 25,852 2.60% 833,261 5.10%

WALKED 20,210 2.00% 453,164 2.80%

OTHER MEANS 27,837 2.80% 377,291 2.30%

WORKED AT HOME 51,969 5.20% 820,887 5.10%

MEAN TRAVEL TIME TO WORK (MINUTES) 26.9 (x) 27 (x)

Source: Profile of SelecTed econoMic characTeriSTicS: cenSuS 2007-2010 aMerican coMMuniTy Survey


Sacramento Region

58

Table A.1 commuting to work in the Sacramento Region in 2000

cOMMutinG tO WOrK el DOraDO Placer sacraMentO sutter yOlO yuBa

tOtal % tOtal % tOtal % tOtal % tOtal % tOtal %

WORKERS 16 YEARS AND OVER

80,112 100.00 155,159 100.00 603,551 100.00 37,230 100.00 88,195 100.00 25,762 100.00

CAR, TRUCK, OR VAN — DROVE ALONE

61,431 76.70 121,291 78.20 452,768 75.00 28.116 75.50 60,980 69.10 19,621 76.20

CAR, TRUCK, OR VAN — CARPOOLED

8,340 10.40 14,858 9.60 78,023 12.90 5,526 14.80 9,762 11.10 3,425 13.30

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION (INCLUDING TAxICAB)

1,146 1.40 1,934 1.20 18,577 3.10 593 1.60 3,374 3.80 228 0.90

WALKED 1,661 2.10 2,534 1.60 11,998 2.00 707 1.90 2,643 3.00 667 2.60

OTHER MEANS 1,643 2.10 2,909 1.90 13,903 2.30 723 1.90 8,055 9.10 604 2.30

WORKED AT HOME 5,891 7.40 11,633 7.50 28,282 4.70 1,565 4.20 3,381 3.80 1,217 4.70

MEAN TRAVEL TIME TO WORK (MINUTES)

29.4 (x) 27 (x) 25.8 (x) 28.4 (x) 21.6 (x) 29.1 (x)

Source: Profile of SelecTed econoMic characTeriSTicS: cenSuS 2007–2010 aMerican coMMuniTy Survey

The “journey to work” data is a limited resource because it asks respon-dents for their primary mode of travel to work; bicycling or walking can often be a secondary or linked mode of transit. In addition bicycle or walking trips to schools are not counted, though they usually di-rectly replace vehicle trips.

In addition, SACOG completed the “Year 2000 Sacramento Area Household Travel Survey” to provide data for a better understanding of travel behavior in the Sacramento region. The following two tables, A.3 and A.4, summarize the trip mode distribution by trip purpose. The numbers shown are the percentage of the trip purpose for each mode type. As an example, 13% of the walking trips are commuting to work and another 8% are for incidental shopping.30

Pedestrians

Pedestrians are people who use the most basic public spaces — side-walks, streets, and other walkways — to travel, and have special characteristics that must be considered in planning. They are highly diverse, including joggers, commuters, people making utilitarian trips such as shopping, groups enjoying a leisurely stroll, people delivering parcels, parents with children, people with pets on a leash, the elderly,

30 Sacramento Area Council of Governments, 2000 Sacramento Area Household

Travel Survey

or people using mobility aids. Pedestrians prefer short and direct routes to their destinations. People will generally walk one-half mile or less to nearby destinations such as transit stops, restaurants, and commercial areas. Typically pedestrians do not like indirect routes or routes that are not clearly delineated. Everyone is a pedestrian, but too often the needs of pedestrians are overlooked in the planning, design and development of our communities.

Walkability refers to the quality of walking conditions, including safety, comfort, and convenience. Walkability is essential in pedestrian areas, and areas with multiple pedestrian trip generators, or destina-tions. Some examples of pedestrian trip generators are restaurants, parks, schools, transit stations and employment and shopping centers. Factors affecting walkability include proximity of uses, the presence of buffers from traffic, and sidewalks wide enough to share comfortably with multiple users. Walkability is key to an urban area’s efficient trans-portation system. Every trip begins and ends with walking. Walking remains the most inexpensive form of transportation for all people, and constructing walkable communities provides the most affordable transportation system any community can plan, design, construct and maintain.

There is more pedestrian activity in some communities than in oth-ers. In downtown Sacramento nearly 24% of residents walk to work.31

31 Geraghty, Anne. Where People Walk in Sacramento, October 2001


Residents in other, older neighborhoods in Sacramento walk to work more often than suburban residents. Street connectivity and distance to destinations are some of the reasons for this difference.

cyclists

Utilitarian bicycle trip lengths are generally 5 miles or less, but much longer trips can be made by bicycle. Bicycling is the most energy ef-ficient mode of travel. Speeds are usually between 10 and 20 MPH, and because of the ability to bicycle directly to destinations without a search for parking, bicycling can be as fast or faster than driving for short trips.

When options are available, cyclists generally choose a route that pro-vides the best balance of the following desirable characteristics:

• Directness between the origin and destination points

• Minimal gradients to be negotiated

• A high quality and well-maintained riding surface

• Lower volumes of motor vehicle traffic

• Adequate space for allowing faster traffic to safely pass

• Pleasant environmental surroundings

• Minimal number of stops

For commuter purposes, the cyclist is most likely to place a significant amount of importance on the first three characteristics mentioned, be-cause they directly affect the energy requirements for making a trip by bicycle. Lower volumes of motor vehicle traffic and adequate space to allow faster traffic to safely pass are desirable for utilitarian trips, but may be sacrificed for speed and directness.

A substantial variation exists in the ages, physical capabilities, and rid-ing philosophies of cyclists currently active in the Sacramento region. This variation results in differences in both the level of expertise among riders and the types of trips they are willing to make. The planning, de-sign, and implementation of the bikeway system should serve as much of this varied population as possible.

Other sources for evaluating bicycle and pedestrian travel are surveys and questionnaires. Specifically the California Department of Trans-portation (Caltrans) conducted surveys in May 2002, 2003, and 2006 to gather information about bicycle commute patterns between Sacra-mento, West Sacramento and Davis.

Tab

le A

.3 A

ctiv

ity

Dis

trib

uti

on

by

Mo

de

(Per

cen

t/fr

equ

ency

, n: 3

3,9

54

)

Pr

iMa

ry

ac

tiv

ity

au

tO

Dr

ive

r

au

tO

Pa

sse

nG

er

tr

an

sit—

Pu

Bli

c B

us

tr

an

sit

—

liG

Ht

ra

ilsc

HO

Ol

Bu

sM

Ot

Or

cy

cle

ta

xi

Wa

lKB

icy

cle

Ot

He

r

DO

n't

Kn

OW

/

re

Fuse

Dr

OW

tO

ta

l

%Fr

eQ

.%

Fre

Q .

%Fr

eQ

.%

Fre

Q .

%Fr

eQ

.%

Fre

Q .

%Fr

eQ

.%

Fre

Q .

%Fr

eQ

.%

Fre

Q .

%Fr

eQ

.%

Fre

Q .

PE

RSO

NA

L A

CT

IVIT

IES

AT

HO

ME

32

.77,

69

83

42

,50

13

9.5

98

32

.15

24

1.9

140

31.

35

30

.84

34

578

38

.12

09

27.

815

66

.72

33

.30

%11

,30

2

INT

ER

NE

T U

SE A

T H

OM

E0

70

10

.21

0.0

0%

9

WO

RK

AT

HO

ME

0.3

790

20

.61

0.4

60

.74

0.3

0%

92

WO

RK

(O

TH

ER

TH

AN

AT

HO

ME

)

18.8

4,4

21

3.7

26

919

.84

93

4.0

55

1.8

612

.52

30

.84

13.3

22

616

.49

014

.88

33

.31

15.1

0%

5,13

1

TE

LEC

OM

MU

NIC

AT

ION

S

AT

WO

RK

INST

EA

D O

F

TR

AV

EL

01

3.1

0.0

0%

1

SCH

OO

L —

CO

LLE

GE

/VO

CA

TIO

NA

L

1.1

25

70

.43

08

.12

03

.75

1.8

61.

42

310

.65

83

.72

1.2

0%

40

1

SCH

OO

L —

DA

YC

AR

E/K

-12

TH

0.4

98

11.5

84

59

.32

33

.16

43

.714

611

187

8.2

45

1.9

14

.00

%1,

35

1

SHO

PP

ING

— IN

CID

EN

TAL

(GA

S, G

RO

CE

RIE

S, E

TC

.)

9.4

2,2

187.

95

85

4.4

115

6.3

17.

913

44

.424

1.9

18

.80

%2

,979

SHO

PP

ING

—

MA

JOR

(A

PP

LIA

NC

ES,

AU

TO

S, E

TC

.)

2.9

69

23

.324

38

.00

.814

0.4

22

.80

%9

51

PE

RSO

NA

L B

USI

NE

SS8

.82

,079

7.4

54

86

150

.613

2.7

918

.83

7.7

16

.511

16

.73

72

2.2

128

.30

%2

,82

8

ME

DIC

AL

1.8

415

1.9

139

1.6

41.

21

15.4

20

.59

0.2

11.

70%

571

EA

T M

EA

LS O

UT

SID

E O

F

HO

ME

4.3

1,0

05

75

121.

23

1.9

212

.52

7.7

17.

312

42

.614

1.9

14

.90

%1,

66

4

SOC

IAL/

RE

CR

EA

TIO

NA

L6

.31,

472

118

104

.411

0.6

34

.214

12.5

27.

71

9.3

158

8.6

47

18.5

107.

40

%2

,52

8

CIV

IC A

CT

IVIT

IES

1.4

33

70

.96

90

.41

16

.31

1.6

28

0.9

51.

30

%4

42

CH

UR

CH

AC

TIV

ITIE

S1

224

1.7

123

0.8

20

.31

0.6

110

.42

1.9

11.

10%

36

4

PIC

K-U

P/D

RO

P-O

FF

PA

SSE

NG

ER

AT

WO

RK

0.9

214

0.8

61

0.1

10

.80

%2

76

PIC

K-U

P/D

RO

P-O

FF

PA

SSE

NG

ER

AT

SC

HO

OL

4.4

1,0

46

3.4

249

0.4

10

.62

2.9

50

0.9

54

.00

%1,

35

3

PIC

K-U

P/D

RO

P-O

FF

PA

SSE

NG

ER

AT

OT

HE

R

PLA

CE

51,

186

4.6

33

60

.82

1.9

30

.93

0.8

130

.42

4.6

0%

1,5

45

OT

HE

R0

.36

40

.53

62

.87

9.3

152

.17

1.6

27

0.5

35.

63

0.5

0%

162

DO

N'T

KN

OW

/RE

FUSE

D0

20

10

.41

0.0

0%

4

cO

luM

n t

Ot

al

(%)

99

.810

09

9 .9

100

.110

010

0 .2

100

.110

010

0 .2

100

.210

010

0 .0

0%

Sou

rc

e: P

ro

file

of

Sele

cT

ed

ec

on

oM

ic c

ha

ra

cT

er

iST

icS:

ce

nSu

S 2

00

7–2

010

aM

er

ica

n c

oM

Mu

niT

y S

ur

ve

y

Tab

le A

.3 A

ctiv

ity

Dis

trib

uti

on

by

Mo

de

(Per

cen

t/fr

equ

ency

, n: 3

3,9

54

)

Pr

iMa

ry

ac

tiv

ity

au

tO

Dr

ive

r

au

tO

Pa

sse

nG

er

tr

an

sit—

Pu

Bli

c B

us

tr

an

sit

—

liG

Ht

ra

ilsc

HO

Ol

Bu

sM

Ot

Or

cy

cle

ta

xi

Wa

lKB

icy

cle

Ot

He

r

DO

n't

Kn

OW

/

re

Fuse

Dr

OW

tO

ta

l

%Fr

eQ

.%

Fre

Q .

%Fr

eQ

.%

Fre

Q .

%Fr

eQ

.%

Fre

Q .

%Fr

eQ

.%

Fre

Q .

%Fr

eQ

.%

Fre

Q .

%Fr

eQ

.%

Fre

Q .

PE

RSO

NA

L A

CT

IVIT

IES

AT

HO

ME

32

.77,

69

83

42

,50

13

9.5

98

32

.15

24

1.9

140

31.

35

30

.84

34

578

38

.12

09

27.

815

66

.72

33

.30

%11

,30

2

INT

ER

NE

T U

SE A

T H

OM

E0

70

10

.21

0.0

0%

9

WO

RK

AT

HO

ME

0.3

790

20

.61

0.4

60

.74

0.3

0%

92

WO

RK

(O

TH

ER

TH

AN

AT

HO

ME

)

18.8

4,4

21

3.7

26

919

.84

93

4.0

55

1.8

612

.52

30

.84

13.3

22

616

.49

014

.88

33

.31

15.1

0%

5,13

1

TE

LEC

OM

MU

NIC

AT

ION

S

AT

WO

RK

INST

EA

D O

F

TR

AV

EL

01

3.1

0.0

0%

1

SCH

OO

L —

CO

LLE

GE

/VO

CA

TIO

NA

L

1.1

25

70

.43

08

.12

03

.75

1.8

61.

42

310

.65

83

.72

1.2

0%

40

1

SCH

OO

L —

DA

YC

AR

E/K

-12

TH

0.4

98

11.5

84

59

.32

33

.16

43

.714

611

187

8.2

45

1.9

14

.00

%1,

35

1

SHO

PP

ING

— IN

CID

EN

TAL

(GA

S, G

RO

CE

RIE

S, E

TC

.)

9.4

2,2

187.

95

85

4.4

115

6.3

17.

913

44

.424

1.9

18

.80

%2

,979

SHO

PP

ING

—

MA

JOR

(A

PP

LIA

NC

ES,

AU

TO

S, E

TC

.)

2.9

69

23

.324

38

.00

.814

0.4

22

.80

%9

51

PE

RSO

NA

L B

USI

NE

SS8

.82

,079

7.4

54

86

150

.613

2.7

918

.83

7.7

16

.511

16

.73

72

2.2

128

.30

%2

,82

8

ME

DIC

AL

1.8

415

1.9

139

1.6

41.

21

15.4

20

.59

0.2

11.

70%

571

EA

T M

EA

LS O

UT

SID

E O

F

HO

ME

4.3

1,0

05

75

121.

23

1.9

212

.52

7.7

17.

312

42

.614

1.9

14

.90

%1,

66

4

SOC

IAL/

RE

CR

EA

TIO

NA

L6

.31,

472

118

104

.411

0.6

34

.214

12.5

27.

71

9.3

158

8.6

47

18.5

107.

40

%2

,52

8

CIV

IC A

CT

IVIT

IES

1.4

33

70

.96

90

.41

16

.31

1.6

28

0.9

51.

30

%4

42

CH

UR

CH

AC

TIV

ITIE

S1

224

1.7

123

0.8

20

.31

0.6

110

.42

1.9

11.

10%

36

4

PIC

K-U

P/D

RO

P-O

FF

PA

SSE

NG

ER

AT

WO

RK

0.9

214

0.8

61

0.1

10

.80

%2

76

PIC

K-U

P/D

RO

P-O

FF

PA

SSE

NG

ER

AT

SC

HO

OL

4.4

1,0

46

3.4

249

0.4

10

.62

2.9

50

0.9

54

.00

%1,

35

3

PIC

K-U

P/D

RO

P-O

FF

PA

SSE

NG

ER

AT

OT

HE

R

PLA

CE

51,

186

4.6

33

60

.82

1.9

30

.93

0.8

130

.42

4.6

0%

1,5

45

OT

HE

R0

.36

40

.53

62

.87

9.3

152

.17

1.6

27

0.5

35.

63

0.5

0%

162

DO

N'T

KN

OW

/RE

FUSE

D0

20

10

.41

0.0

0%

4

cO

luM

n t

Ot

al

(%)

99

.810

09

9 .9

100

.110

010

0 .2

100

.110

010

0 .2

100

.210

010

0 .0

0%

Sou

rc

e: P

ro

file

of

Sele

cT

ed

ec

on

oM

ic c

ha

ra

cT

er

iST

icS:

ce

nSu

S 2

00

7–2

010

aM

er

ica

n c

oM

Mu

niT

y S

ur

ve

y

Tab

le A

.4 M

od

e D

istr

ibu

tio

n b

y A

ctiv

ity

(Per

cen

t/fr

equ

ency

, n: 3

3,9

54

)

Pr

iMa

ry

ac

tiv

ity

au

tO

Dr

ive

r

au

tO

Pa

sse

nG

er

tr

an

sit

—

Pu

Bli

c B

us

tr

an

sit

—

liG

Ht

ra

ilsc

HO

Ol

Bu

sM

Ot

Or

cy

cle

ta

xi

Wa

lKB

icy

cle

Ot

He

r

DO

n’t

Kn

OW

/

re

Fuse

Dr

OW

tO

ta

l

%Fr

eQ

.%

Fre

Q .

%Fr

eQ

.%

Fre

Q .

%Fr

eQ

.%

Fre

Q .

%Fr

eQ

.%

Fre

Q .

%Fr

eQ

.%

Fre

Q .

%Fr

eQ

.%

Fre

Q .

PE

RSO

NA

L A

CT

IVIT

IES

AT

HO

ME

68

.17,

69

82

2.1

2,5

01

0.9

98

0.5

52

1.2

140

05

04

5.1

578

1.8

20

90

.115

02

33

.30

%11

,30

2

INT

ER

NE

T U

SE A

T H

OM

E77

.87

11.1

111

.11

0.0

0%

9

WO

RK

AT

HO

ME

85.

979

2.2

21.

11

6.5

64

.34

0.3

0%

92

WO

RK

(O

TH

ER

TH

AN

AT

HO

ME

)

86

.24

,42

15.

22

69

14

91.

15

50

.16

02

0.1

44

.42

26

1.8

90

0.2

80

115

.10

%5,

131

TE

LEC

OM

MU

NIC

AT

ION

S

AT

WO

RK

INST

EA

D O

F

TR

AV

EL

100

10

.00

%1

SCH

OO

L —

CO

LLE

GE

/VO

CA

TIO

NA

L

64

.12

57

7.5

30

52

01.

25

1.5

65.

72

314

.55

80

.52

1.2

0%

40

1

SCH

OO

L —

DA

YC

AR

E/K

-12

TH

7.3

98

62

.58

45

1.7

23

0.4

610

.814

613

.818

73

.34

50

.11

4.0

0%

1,3

51

SHO

PP

ING

—

INC

IDE

NTA

L (G

AS,

GR

OC

ER

IES,

ET

C.)

74.5

2,2

1819

.65

85

0.4

110

.25

01

4.5

134

0.8

240

18

.80

%2

,979

SHO

PP

ING

— M

AJO

R

(AP

PLI

AN

CE

S, A

UT

OS,

ET

C.)

72.8

69

22

5.6

243

1.5

140

.22

2.8

0%

95

1

PE

RSO

NA

L B

USI

NE

SS73

.52

,079

19.4

54

80

.515

0.5

130

.39

0.1

30

13

.911

11.

33

70

.412

8.3

0%

2,8

28

ME

DIC

AL

72.7

415

24.3

139

0.7

40

.21

0.4

21.

69

0.2

11.

70%

571

EA

T M

EA

LS O

UT

SID

E O

F

HO

ME

60

.41,

00

53

0.8

512

0.2

30

.12

0.1

20

.11

7.5

124

0.8

140

.11

4.9

0%

1,6

64

SOC

IAL/

RE

CR

EA

TIO

NA

L5

8.2

1,4

723

28

100

.411

0.1

30

.614

0.1

20

16

.315

81.

94

70

.410

7.4

0%

2,5

28

CIV

IC A

CT

IVIT

IES

76.2

33

715

.66

90

.21

0.2

10

.21

6.3

28

1.1

51.

30

%4

42

CH

UR

CH

AC

TIV

ITIE

S6

1.5

224

33

.812

30

.52

0.3

13

110

.52

0.3

11.

10%

36

4

PIC

K-U

P/D

RO

P-O

FF

PA

SSE

NG

ER

AT

WO

RK

77.5

214

22

.16

20

.41

0.8

0%

277

PIC

K-U

P/D

RO

P-O

FF

PA

SSE

NG

ER

AT

SC

HO

OL

77.3

1,0

46

18.4

249

0.1

10

.12

3.7

50

0.4

54

.00

%1,

35

3

PIC

K-U

P/D

RO

P-O

FF

PA

SSE

NG

ER

AT

OT

HE

R

PLA

CE

76.8

1,18

62

1.7

33

60

.12

0.2

30

.23

0.8

130

.12

4.6

0%

1,5

45

OT

HE

R3

9.5

64

22

.23

64

.37

9.3

154

.37

16.7

27

1.9

31.

93

0.5

0%

162

DO

N'T

KN

OW

/RE

FUSE

D5

02

25

12

51

0.0

0%

4

Pe

rc

en

t O

F t

Ot

al

tr

iPs

69

.30

%2

1 .70

%0

.70

%0

.50

%1 .

00

%0

.00

%0

.00

%5

.00

%1 .

60

%0

.20

%0

.00

%10

0 .0

0

Sou

rc

e: P

ro

file

of

Sele

cT

ed

ec

on

oM

ic c

ha

ra

cT

er

iST

icS:

ce

nSu

S 2

00

7–2

010

aM

er

ica

n c

oM

Mu

niT

y S

ur

ve

y


Sacramento Region

62

The following tables show the number of bicycle and pedestrian injuries and fatalities in the Sacramento region from 1991 to 2010, grouped by age. Please note: the age-ranges reported changed after 2006/07.

Table A.5 Pedestrian injuries, 1991 to 2009 — Nonfatal Hospitalized injuries in the Sacramento Region

aGe

year <1 1–4 5–12 13–15 16–20 21–44 45–64 65+ tOtal

1991 1 38 49 12 24 137 46 33 340

1992 0 32 48 15 21 94 41 22 273

1993 0 43 57 25 23 113 45 33 339

1994 1 38 56 21 20 122 51 30 339

1995 2 37 48 24 19 116 69 35 350

1996 0 33 44 26 16 91 33 49 292

1997 0 31 39 13 14 92 64 35 288

1998 1 24 32 18 15 65 38 23 216

1999 1 22 36 10 30 85 54 49 287

2000 0 25 41 17 22 111 62 44 322

2001 1 27 38 17 31 105 68 31 318

2002 2 27 39 9 25 110 61 37 310

2003 0 21 34 17 24 91 66 39 292

2004 1 29 36 25 39 113 64 33 340

2005 0 20 23 24 21 108 75 28 299

2006 1 23 21 19 20 106 52 32 274

tOtal 11 470 641 292 364 1,659 889 553 4,879

year <1–4 5–9 10–14 15–19 20–24 25–44 45–64 65+ tOtal

2007 13 16 17 31 26 62 48 36 249

2008 9 7 20 25 30 55 63 32 241

2009 13 9 11 23 29 57 59 31 232

tOtal 35 32 48 79 85 174 170 99 722

Source: california deParTMenT of healTh ServiceS, ePi cenTer

A.2APPENDix

iNjuRy STATiSTicS


Table A.6 Pedestrian injuries, 1991 to 2009 — fatal injuries in the Sacramento Region

AGE

year <1 1–4 5–12 13–15 16–20 21–44 45–64 65+ tOtal

1991 0 3 1 0 4 19 10 15 52

1992 0 4 3 2 1 15 12 10 47

1993 0 2 5 2 1 20 7 9 46

1994 0 5 6 0 3 21 7 13 55

1995 0 3 6 3 5 20 10 12 59

1996 0 3 2 0 2 15 14 12 48

1997 0 3 3 0 2 20 12 10 50

1998 0 1 2 0 0 14 13 10 40

1999 0 2 2 2 2 13 13 12 46

2000 2 0 1 1 3 11 11 12 41

2001 0 2 4 3 1 21 15 7 53

2002 0 0 0 1 3 12 18 10 44

2003 0 1 3 2 5 16 17 16 60

2004 0 3 0 1 3 23 22 14 66

2005 0 2 2 2 0 27 24 9 66

2006 1 2 0 2 4 9 21 9 48

2007 0 2 1 1 3 21 16 12 56

tOtal 3 38 41 22 42 297 242 192 877

year <1–4 5–9 10–14 15–19 20–24 25–44 45–64 65+ tOtal

2008 1 0 0 4 1 9 14 4 33

2009 2 0 0 1 1 9 19 6 38

tOtal 3 0 0 5 2 18 33 10 71

Source: Profile of SelecTed econoMic characTeriSTicS: cenSuS 2007-2010 aMerican coMMuniTy Survey


Sacramento Region

64

Table A.7 Bicycle injuries, 1991 to 2009 — Nonfatal Hospitalized injuries in the Sacramento Region

aGe

year <1 1–4 5–12 13–15 16–20 21–44 45–64 65+ tOtal

1991 0 8 79 46 31 132 45 16 357

1992 0 9 80 43 27 127 37 18 341

1993 0 11 77 40 26 120 44 19 337

1994 0 7 68 31 21 141 55 26 349

1995 0 6 72 41 23 157 63 21 383

1996 0 3 55 34 26 144 58 20 340

1997 0 9 88 40 38 166 77 23 441

1998 0 3 61 33 24 141 72 25 359

1999 0 11 72 30 24 146 70 18 371

2000 1 5 58 30 23 121 104 21 363

2001 0 4 52 43 33 126 92 16 366

2002 0 6 49 30 27 107 73 26 318

2003 0 6 45 38 27 94 84 24 318

2004 0 10 55 41 33 116 108 35 398

2005 0 5 54 30 22 112 94 21 338

2006 0 9 56 34 25 99 116 26 365

tOtal 1 112 1,021 584 430 2,049 1,192 355 5,744

year <1–4 9–May 14–Oct 15–19 20–24 25–44 45–64 65+ tOtal

2007 2 22 37 18 16 96 133 40 364

2008 6 21 39 36 24 84 130 31 371

2009 3 16 43 38 22 98 156 36 412

tOtal 11 59 119 92 62 278 419 107 1,147


Table A.8 Bicycle injuries, 1991 to 2009 — fatal injuries in the Sacramento Region

aGe

year <1 1–4 5–12 13–15 16–20 21–44 45–64 65+ tOtal

1991 0 0 2 0 0 2 2 2 8

1992 0 0 0 0 1 6 3 0 10

1993 0 0 5 0 0 3 2 2 12

1994 0 0 0 1 0 4 1 2 8

1995 0 0 3 1 0 8 2 0 14

1996 0 0 1 1 2 3 1 1 9

1997 0 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 11

1998 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 4

1999 0 0 1 0 2 6 2 0 11

2000 0 0 1 1 0 3 3 0 8

2001 0 0 0 0 0 5 2 1 8

2002 0 0 1 1 0 6 7 1 16

2003 0 0 2 0 3 6 5 0 16

2004 0 0 1 1 0 2 5 1 10

2005 0 0 0 1 1 4 3 1 10

2006 0 0 0 1 2 1 2 1 7

2007 0 0 1 0 0 1 5 3 10

tOtal 0 0 18 9 12 66 51 16 172

year 1–4 5–9 10–14 15–19 20–24 25–44 45–64 65+ tOtal

2008 0 0 0 2 1 2 4 3 12

2009 0 0 1 1 1 3 2 1 9

tOtal 0 0 1 3 2 5 6 4 21


Sacramento Region

66

This Master Plan includes a comprehensive list of planned projects, submitted by local jurisdic-tions, typically from recently adopted Bicycle Transportation Plans or other planning docu-ments. The city or county’s highest priority projects should be at the top of the list, and likely the projects that agencies will seek to get funded through the Funding Program. This expansive list is not fiscally constrained, but is an effort to understand the future regional bicycle and pedestrian network, and to evaluate additional needs.

BAPPENDix

REgioNAL PRojEcT LiST AND MAPS of BicycLE NETwoRk

Appendix B ‐‐ Regional Project List and Maps of Bicycle Network

ID COUNTY JURISDICTION PROJECT TYPE PROJECT LOCATION SEGMENT / DESCRIPTION DISTANCE EXISTING PLAN EST. COSTRanking?

(High/Medium /Lower Priority)

CITY OF PLACERVILLE10041 El Dorado City of Placerville Multi‐use Path (Class I) El Dorado Trail Clay Street to Bedford Avenue 0.25 City of Placerville Non‐Motorized Transportation Plan (2010) TBD Higher Priority

10042 El Dorado City of Placerville Multi‐use Path (Class I) El Dorado Trail Main Street at Forni Road to Ray Lawyer Drive 1 City of Placerville Non‐Motorized Transportation Plan (2010) TBD Higher Priority

10043 El Dorado City of Placerville Multi‐use Path (Class I)Government Center Placerville Drive connector

Fair Lane to Armory Way 0.5 City of Placerville Non‐Motorized Transportation Plan (2010) TBD Medium Priority

10044 El Dorado City of Placerville Multi‐use Path (Class I)Government Center to Fairgrounds Connector

Fair Lane Court to El Dorado County Fairgrounds 0.1 City of Placerville Non‐Motorized Transportation Plan (2010) TBD Medium Priority

10045 El Dorado City of Placerville Multi‐use Path (Class I) Quartz Mountain Bike PathQuartz Mountain Road to Robin Court/Tunnel Street

0.25 City of Placerville Non‐Motorized Transportation Plan (2010) TBD Medium Priority

10046 El Dorado City of Placerville Multi‐use Path (Class I) Weber Creek Bridge OvercrossingPerks Court (El Dorado County) to Placerville Drive/Forni Road


10001 El Dorado City of Placerville Bike Lanes (Class II) Mallard Lane Green Valley Road to City limit 0.5 City of Placerville Non‐Motorized Transportation Plan (2010) TBD Higher Priority

10003 El Dorado City of Placerville Bike Lanes (Class II) Placerville Drive Green Valley Road to Forni Road/US 50 0.5 City of Placerville Non‐Motorized Transportation Plan (2010) TBD Higher Priority

10018 El Dorado City of Placerville Bike Lanes (Class II) Broadway Main Street to Schnell School Road 0.5 City of Placerville Non‐Motorized Transportation Plan (2010) TBD Higher Priority

10010 El Dorado City of Placerville Bike Lanes (Class II) Middletown Road Canal Street to Cold Springs Road 0.25 City of Placerville Non‐Motorized Transportation Plan (2010) TBD Higher Priority

10002 El Dorado City of Placerville Bike Lanes (Class II) Green Valley Road Placerville Drive to Mallard Lane 0.2 City of Placerville Non‐Motorized Transportation Plan (2010) TBD Medium Priority

10004 El Dorado City of Placerville Bike Lanes (Class II) Placerville Drive Bridge over Hangtown Creek 0.1 City of Placerville Non‐Motorized Transportation Plan (2010) TBD Medium Priority

10005 El Dorado City of Placerville Bike Lanes (Class II) Forni Road Ray Lawyer Drive to US 50/Placerville Drive 0.5 City of Placerville Non‐Motorized Transportation Plan (2010) TBD Medium Priority

10006 El Dorado City of Placerville Bike Lanes (Class II) Cold Springs Road City Limit to Placerville Drive 0.15 City of Placerville Non‐Motorized Transportation Plan (2010) TBD Medium Priority

10007 El Dorado City of Placerville Bike Lanes (Class II) Combellack Road Entire length 0.25 City of Placerville Non‐Motorized Transportation Plan (2010) TBD Medium Priority

10008 El Dorado City of Placerville Bike Lanes (Class II) State Route 49 City Limit to Green Street 1 City of Placerville Non‐Motorized Transportation Plan (2010) TBD Medium Priority

10009 El Dorado City of Placerville Bike Lanes (Class II) Spring Street SR 49 to Pleasant Street 0.35 City of Placerville Non‐Motorized Transportation Plan (2010) TBD Medium Priority

10011 El Dorado City of Placerville Bike Lanes (Class II) Bee Street Entire length 0.25 City of Placerville Non‐Motorized Transportation Plan (2010) TBD Medium Priority

10012 El Dorado City of Placerville Bike Lanes (Class II) Main Street Spring Street to Canal Street 0.2 City of Placerville Non‐Motorized Transportation Plan (2010) TBD Medium Priority

10013 El Dorado City of Placerville Bike Lanes (Class II) Pacific Street Main Street to Sacramento Street and Cedar Ravine t 0.2 City of Placerville Non‐Motorized Transportation Plan (2010) TBD Medium Priority

10014 El Dorado City of Placerville Bike Lanes (Class II) Marshall Way Cedar Ravine to Marshall Hospital 0.25 City of Placerville Non‐Motorized Transportation Plan (2010) TBD Medium Priority

10015 El Dorado City of Placerville Bike Lanes (Class II) Clay Street Coleman Street to Arizona Way 0.2 City of Placerville Non‐Motorized Transportation Plan (2010) TBD Medium Priority

10016 El Dorado City of Placerville Bike Lanes (Class II) Mosquito Road Dimity Lane to Broadway 0.25 City of Placerville Non‐Motorized Transportation Plan (2010) TBD Medium Priority

10017 El Dorado City of Placerville Bike Lanes (Class II) Schnell School Road Broadway to Carson Road 0.25 City of Placerville Non‐Motorized Transportation Plan (2010) TBD Medium Priority

10019 El Dorado City of Placerville Bike Lanes (Class II) Broadway Schnell School Road to Point View Drive 1 City of Placerville Non‐Motorized Transportation Plan (2010) TBD Medium Priority

10020 El Dorado City of Placerville Bike Lanes (Class II) Tunnel Street Spring Street to Robin Court 0.25 City of Placerville Non‐Motorized Transportation Plan (2010) TBD Medium Priority

10021 El Dorado City of Placerville Bike Lanes (Class II) Cedar Ravine Washington Street to Lyon Park 1 City of Placerville Non‐Motorized Transportation Plan (2010) TBD Medium Priority

10031 El Dorado City of Placerville Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Main Street Spring Street to Clay Street 0.5 City of Placerville Non‐Motorized Transportation Plan (2010) TBD Higher Priority

10022 El Dorado City of Placerville Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Armory Drive Entire length 0.25 City of Placerville Non‐Motorized Transportation Plan (2010) TBD Medium Priority

10023 El Dorado City of Placerville Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Canal Street Entire length 0.75 City of Placerville Non‐Motorized Transportation Plan (2010) TBD Medium Priority

10024 El Dorado City of Placerville Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Bedford Avenue Pleasant Street to Gold Bug Park 0.75 City of Placerville Non‐Motorized Transportation Plan (2010) TBD Medium Priority

10025 El Dorado City of Placerville Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Moulton Drive/Markham Drive Entire length 0.25 City of Placerville Non‐Motorized Transportation Plan (2010) TBD Medium Priority

10026 El Dorado City of Placerville Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Coloma Court Entire length 0.25 City of Placerville Non‐Motorized Transportation Plan (2010) TBD Medium Priority

10027 El Dorado City of Placerville Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder SR 49 and Coloma Street Green Street to US 50 Overcrossing 0.2 City of Placerville Non‐Motorized Transportation Plan (2010) TBD Medium Priority

10028 El Dorado City of Placerville Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Benham Avenue Entire length 0.25 City of Placerville Non‐Motorized Transportation Plan (2010) TBD Medium Priority

10029 El Dorado City of Placerville Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Big Cut Road To City limit 0.5 City of Placerville Non‐Motorized Transportation Plan (2010) TBD Medium Priority

10030 El Dorado City of Placerville Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Spring Street US 50 to Pleasant Street 0.1 City of Placerville Non‐Motorized Transportation Plan (2010) TBD Medium Priority

10032 El Dorado City of Placerville Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Cedar Ravine Main Street to Marshall Way 0.25 City of Placerville Non‐Motorized Transportation Plan (2010) TBD Medium Priority

Page 1 of 59




10033 El Dorado City of Placerville Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Washington Street Main Street to Cedar Ravine 0.5 City of Placerville Non‐Motorized Transportation Plan (2010) TBD Medium Priority

10034 El Dorado City of Placerville Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Sherman Street/Thompson Street/SherWashington Street to Sierra School/Main Street 0.35 City of Placerville Non‐Motorized Transportation Plan (2010) TBD Medium Priority

10035 El Dorado City of Placerville Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Spanish Ravine RoadConnection from Main Street to McDonald's parking lot


10036 El Dorado City of Placerville Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Clay Street Arizona Way to Mosquito Road 0.5 City of Placerville Non‐Motorized Transportation Plan (2010) TBD Medium Priority

10037 El Dorado City of Placerville Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Carson Road Broadway to Dimity Lane 0.25 City of Placerville Non‐Motorized Transportation Plan (2010) TBD Medium Priority

10038 El Dorado City of Placerville Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Dimity Lane Mosquito Road to Carson Road 0.1 City of Placerville Non‐Motorized Transportation Plan (2010) TBD Medium Priority

10039 El Dorado City of Placerville Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Wiltse Road Broadway to Lumsden Park 0.5 City of Placerville Non‐Motorized Transportation Plan (2010) TBD Medium Priority

10040 El Dorado City of Placerville Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Clark Street Pacific Street to Rotary Park 0.5 City of Placerville Non‐Motorized Transportation Plan (2010) TBD Medium Priority

10047 El Dorado City of Placerville Support Facilities Bike Racks Lower Broadway, near Taco Bell, Rite Aid City of Placerville Non‐Motorized Transportation Plan (2010) TBD Medium Priority

10048 El Dorado City of Placerville Support Facilities Bike Racks Upper Broadway, near Grocery Outlet City of Placerville Non‐Motorized Transportation Plan (2010) TBD Medium Priority

10049 El Dorado City of Placerville Support Facilities Bike Racks At Raley's Center on Placerville Drive City of Placerville Non‐Motorized Transportation Plan (2010) TBD Medium Priority

10050 El Dorado City of Placerville Support Facilities Bike Lockers Placerville Station on Mosquito Road City of Placerville Non‐Motorized Transportation Plan (2010) TBD Medium Priority

10051 El Dorado City of Placerville Support Facilities Bike Lockers Downtown Parking Garage City of Placerville Non‐Motorized Transportation Plan (2010) TBD Medium Priority

10052 El Dorado City of Placerville Support Facilities Bike LockersAt any new Park and Ride Lot in the City of Placerville

City of Placerville Non‐Motorized Transportation Plan (2010) TBD Medium Priority

Page 2 of 59

FORNI RD

BROADW AY

CA RSON RD

MOSQUI TO RD

BIG CUT RD

CEDAR RAVINE RD

MAIN ST

COLD SPRINGS RDUNION RIDGE RD

EL D

ORAD

O RD

CANAL ST

FAIR LN

BEDFORD AVE

BEAR ROCK RD

TEXAS HILL RD

PLACERVILLE DR

COON HOLLOW RD

HOLLAN D DR

JA CQUIER

RD

GREEN VALLEY RD

CLAY ST

WAL LACE RD

CLARK ST

DIANA ST

MALLARD LN

SMITH FLAT RD

MISSOURI FLAT RD

MORREN E DR

GINGHAM CTPAYDIRT DR

OAK KNOLL RD

BLAIRS LN

AIRP ORT RD

CRIBBS RD

TUNNEL ST

RAY LAWYER DR

COUNTRY CLUB DR

OAK LN

CA

MP NA UVOO RD

BARRETT DR

STONECRES T RD

MOTHER

LODE

DR

PACIFIC ST

MEADO W LN

WILT SE RD

BEE ST

NUGG

ET LN

ANDLE

R RD

RUNNYMEADE DR

BAKER

RD

DAWN LN

CASWELL RDDIAS DR

H IGHLAND DR

MADRONE LN

TYRREL LN

DEBBI E LN

BRYAN WAY

TEC OLOTE DR

SPRING ST

BEALS RD

SKYLIN E CT

GOLD BUG LN

LONG

HRUT RD

TURNER ST

SH

ADY LN

EXCELS

IOR RD

HA RRIS CT

JAW

BONE

RD

SUNDANCE TRL

LO HI

WAY

HARRIS RD

FERRARI CT

CAR DINAL DR

MADDEN LNKIN GSGATE RD

DONOVA N RANCH RD

TRUCK ST

OAK T

ERRACE

PETR

I LN

ROSE LN

SHADOW RUN R D

LA VISTA DR

FINCH RD

CHAPIN RD

BLACKS LN

RIDGE CT

M IDDLE TOWN RD

BUSH CT

RD 145

BACO DR

ARROYO VISTA WAY

SIERRA DR

MILLER WAYMYRTLE AVE

CENTENNIAL CT

S KYLINE DR

LODE RD

MOUNTAIN WAY

BOX CANYON RD

SPANISH RAVINE ST

GLORY RD

FURLONG LN

JAMES DR

ROYAL VIEW DR

PARLEYS CANYON

POCKET MINE RD

WOOD

RIDGE

CT

SKY CT

KOAL

A LN

LYDIA LN

TELEMARK CTPR

AIRIE

VIEW LN

POVERTY HILL DR

OLD TOLL RD

MARSHALL WAYWASATCH RD

LOIS

L N

HELMRICH LN

ANCHOR CT

MIRACLE MOUNTAIN DR

BRIW RD

PENNY LN

SKIS

RD

ARMO

RY DR

BLUE JAY DR

BRENDAN WAY

BELLS RD

ZIA R

D

DAVIS CT

RIBBON LN

LOST LN LANE CT

PINTAIL LN

SOFAR RD

ELLENWOOD LN

UNION ST

BARRY LN

LOCK

IE CT

HOLLY WAY

SLUICE B O X RD

KIMI WAY

WILDER LN

GEMSTONE RD

FRANCIS AVE

LO HI CT

ORCHARD WAY

TEXE

RNA C

T

DUDEN DRRECTOR ST

SLUMBER CT

PATS LN

BUTTERFLY LN

PLAZA DR

HILLSIDE CT

DONNER TRL

HILLTOP DR

ESTEY WAY

PENN RD

UNNAMED RD

NOEL CT

PEAR RIDGE RD

AMBER LN

CANA

L CT

KEOK

UK D

R

RD2232

SHILOH CT

JANE DR

PIERROZ RD

HEADY LN

Placerville Proposed Multi-Use PathProposed Bike LaneProposed Bike Route

! SchoolsCities

Existing Multi-Use Path (Class I)Existing Bike Lane (Class II)Existing Bike Route (Class III)




EL DORADO COUNTY

10054 El Dorado El Dorado Hills Area Multi‐use Path (Class I) El Dorado Hills Blvd. Bike PathPhase 1: Sign and stripe existing Class I paths in two locations: 1) From Harvard Way to St. Andrews 2) From Governors Dr. to Francisco Dr.

1.5 mile El Dorado County Bicycle Transportation Plan 2010 Update TBD

10055 El Dorado El Dorado Hills Area Multi‐use Path (Class I) El Dorado Hills Blvd. Bike Path

Phase 2: Utilizing an existing golf cart undercrossing of Serrano Parkway, extend the bike path from the current terminus at Serrano Parkway to El Dorado Hills Village Center Shopping Center


10056 El Dorado El Dorado Hills Area Multi‐use Path (Class I) Harvard Way Bike Path From Clermond Road to El Dorado Hills Boulevard 0.5 mile El Dorado County Bicycle Transportation Plan 2010 Update TBD

10058 El Dorado El Dorado Hills Area Multi‐use Path (Class I) El Dorado Hills SMUD TrailWithin the SMUD power line easement between Silva Valley Parkway and El Dorado Hills Boulevard

0.6 miles El Dorado County Bicycle Transportation Plan 2010 Update TBD

10060 El Dorado El Dorado Hills Area Multi‐use Path (Class I)Old Bass Lake Road ‐ EDH to Bass Lake Connection

Phase 2: EDH to Bass Lake Connection. Between gates, using existing roadway as Class I path


10061 El Dorado El Dorado Hills Area Multi‐use Path (Class I)Parallel to Highway 50 on the north side ‐ EDH to Bass Lake Connection

Phase 2: EDH to Bass Lake Connection. From Silva Valley Parkway to El Dorado Hills Village Center Shopping Center at El Dorado Hills Boulevard


10066 El Dorado El Dorado Hills Area Multi‐use Path (Class I) Highway 50 over or undercrossingCrosses Caltrans facility (US 50) North/South between the El Dorado Hills Town Center and El Dorado Hills Village Center

.25 miles El Dorado County Bicycle Transportation Plan 2010 Update TBD

10069 El Dorado El Dorado Hills Area Multi‐use Path (Class I) El Dorado Hills SMUD TrailWithing the SMUD power line easement between Silva Valley Parkway and El Dorado Hills Boulevard


10071 El Dorado El Dorado Hills Area Multi‐use Path (Class I) Valley View Bike PathsAlong Valley View parkway to schools, parks and village center


10053 El Dorado El Dorado Hills Area Bike Lanes (Class II) El Dorado Hills Blvd. Bike Lanes Phase 1: Saratoga Way to Governor Dr./St. Andrews 1.7 miles El Dorado County Bicycle Transportation Plan 2010 Update TBD

10062 El Dorado El Dorado Hills Area Bike Lanes (Class II) Saratoga Way Extension Class II bike lanes on extension of Saratoga Way to Iro 0.5 miles El Dorado County Bicycle Transportation Plan 2010 Update TBD

10063 El Dorado El Dorado Hills Area Bike Lanes (Class II) Green Valley Road Bike LanesEl Dorado Hills Boulevard to Pleasant Grove Middle School

7 miles El Dorado County Bicycle Transportation Plan 2010 Update TBD

10064 El Dorado El Dorado Hills Area Bike Lanes (Class II) White Rock Road Entire Length, to County Line 1 mile El Dorado County Bicycle Transportation Plan 2010 Update TBD

10065 El Dorado El Dorado Hills Area Bike Lanes (Class II) Silva Valley Parkway Entire Length 4 miles El Dorado County Bicycle Transportation Plan 2010 Update TBD

10067 El Dorado El Dorado Hills Area Bike Lanes (Class II) Saratoga Way ExtensionClass II bike lanes on the extension of Saratoga Way (or Class I Trail if Saratoga Way extension is delayed)

1 mile El Dorado County Bicycle Transportation Plan 2010 Update TBD

10068 El Dorado El Dorado Hills Area Bike Lanes (Class II) El Dorado Hills Blvd. Bike LanesPhase 2: Governors Dr./St. Andrews to Green Valley Road


10070 El Dorado El Dorado Hills Area Bike Lanes (Class II) Latrobe Road Highway 50 to Deer Creek 2.5 miles El Dorado County Bicycle Transportation Plan 2010 Update TBD

10072 El Dorado El Dorado Hills Area Bike Lanes (Class II) Valley View Parkway Entire Length 1.5 miles El Dorado County Bicycle Transportation Plan 2010 Update TBD

10073 El Dorado El Dorado Hills Area Bike Lanes (Class II) Harvard Way Bike Path Entire Length 0.5 miles El Dorado County Bicycle Transportation Plan 2010 Update TBD

10074 El Dorado El Dorado Hills Area Bike Lanes (Class II) Francisco Drive Green Valley Road to El Dorado Hills Boulevard 0.5 miles El Dorado County Bicycle Transportation Plan 2010 Update TBD

10075 El Dorado El Dorado Hills Area Bike Lanes (Class II) Ambiance Drive Sophia Parkway to Brittany Way 1 mile El Dorado County Bicycle Transportation Plan 2010 Update TBD

10076 El Dorado El Dorado Hills Area Bike Lanes (Class II) Brittany Way Ambiance Drive to El Dorado Hills Boulevard 0.5 miles El Dorado County Bicycle Transportation Plan 2010 Update TBD

10077 El Dorado El Dorado Hills Area Bike Lanes (Class II) Through El Dorado Hills town Center Through entire commercial center 1 mile El Dorado County Bicycle Transportation Plan 2010 Update TBD

10078 El Dorado El Dorado Hills Area Bike Lanes (Class II) Serrano Parkway Entire Length 3.5 miles El Dorado County Bicycle Transportation Plan 2010 Update TBD

10079 El Dorado El Dorado Hills Area Bike Lanes (Class II) Saratoga Way Entire Length 1 mile El Dorado County Bicycle Transportation Plan 2010 Update TBD

10080 El Dorado El Dorado Hills Area Bike Lanes (Class II) Village Center Drive Entire Length 0.5 mile El Dorado County Bicycle Transportation Plan 2010 Update TBD

10081 El Dorado El Dorado Hills Area Bike Lanes (Class II) Windplay Road Entire Length 0.25 mile El Dorado County Bicycle Transportation Plan 2010 Update TBD

10082 El Dorado El Dorado Hills Area Bike Lanes (Class II) Golden Foothill Parkway Entire Length 2 miles El Dorado County Bicycle Transportation Plan 2010 Update TBD

11005 El Dorado El Dorado Hills Area Bike Lanes (Class II) Green Valley Road Bike Lanes Loch Way to Pleasant Grove Middle School 6 miles El Dorado County Bicycle Transportation Plan 2010 Update $288,000

10057 El Dorado El Dorado Hills Area Bike Route (Class III) / ShoulderTong Road ‐ EDH to Old Bass Lake Road Connection

Phase I: EDH to Bass Lake Connection. Entire length 0.5 mile El Dorado County Bicycle Transportation Plan 2010 Update TBD

10059 El Dorado El Dorado Hills Area Bike Route (Class III) / ShoulderOld Bass Lake Road ‐ EDH to Bass Lake Connection

Phase 1: EDH to Bass Lake Connection. Entire length 1 mile El Dorado County Bicycle Transportation Plan 2010 Update TBD

10083 El Dorado El Dorado Hills Area Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Sheffield Drive Entire Length 1 mile El Dorado County Bicycle Transportation Plan 2010 Update TBD

10084 El Dorado El Dorado Hills Area Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Francisco Drive Sheffield Dr. to Green Valley Road 1.5 mile El Dorado County Bicycle Transportation Plan 2010 Update TBD

Page 3 of 59




10085 El Dorado El Dorado Hills Area Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Lakehilles Drive Sheffield Drive to El Dorado Hills Boulevard 1 mile El Dorado County Bicycle Transportation Plan 2010 Update TBD

10086 El Dorado El Dorado Trail Multi‐use Path (Class I) El Dorado TrailMissouri Flat Road to Mother Lode Drive in El Dorado

3 miles El Dorado County Bicycle Transportation Plan 2010 Update 1.2 million

10087 El Dorado El Dorado Trail Multi‐use Path (Class I) El Dorado Trail Latrobe to Sacramento County/City of Folsom 7 miles El Dorado County Bicycle Transportation Plan 2010 Update 2.8 million

10088 El Dorado El Dorado Trail Multi‐use Path (Class I) El Dorado TrailMother Lode Dr. in El Dorado to Mother Lode Drive in Shingle Springs (maps 4 & 2)

4.75 miles El Dorado County Bicycle Transportation Plan 2010 Update 1.9 million

10089 El Dorado El Dorado Trail Multi‐use Path (Class I) El Dorado TrailMother Lode Drive to Shingle Springs to Shingle Lime Mine Road

2.5 miles El Dorado County Bicycle Transportation Plan 2010 Update 1 million

10090 El Dorado El Dorado Trail Multi‐use Path (Class I) El Dorado TrailExtend existing Class I at Los Trampas Drive to Snows Road in Camino


10091 El Dorado El Dorado Trail Multi‐use Path (Class I) El Dorado Trail Shingle Lime Mine Road to Latrobe Road 8 miles El Dorado County Bicycle Transportation Plan 2010 Update

10092 El Dorado El Dorado Trail Multi‐use Path (Class I) El Dorado Trail Over Crossing of Missouri Flat Road 200 feet El Dorado County Bicycle Transportation Plan 2010 Update 1 million

11006 El Dorado El Dorado Trail Multi‐use Path (Class I) El Dorado TrailExtend existing Class I at Los Trampas Drive to Halcon Road

1 mile El Dorado County Bicycle Transportation Plan 2010 Update $520,379

10095 El Dorado US 50 Corridor Multi‐use Path (Class I) US 50 CorridorClass I bike path ‐ Silva Valley Parkway to El Dorado Hills Blvd.


10099 El Dorado US 50 Corridor Multi‐use Path (Class I) US 50 CorridorClass I bike path connection: Wild Chaparral Drive to Palmer Drive

2.5 miles El Dorado County Bicycle Transportation Plan 2010 Update 1 million

11000 El Dorado US 50 Corridor Multi‐use Path (Class I) US 50 CorridorClass I bike path ‐ Tierra de Dios to Old Bass Lake Road

0.9 miles El Dorado County Bicycle Transportation Plan 2010 Update $25,000

11003 El Dorado US 50 Corridor Multi‐use Path (Class I) US 50 CorridorClass I bike path ‐ Forni Road / Lower Main St. to Ray Lawyer Dr.


11004 El Dorado US 50 Corridor Multi‐use Path (Class I) US 50 Corridor Class I bike path ‐ Clay Street to Bedford Street .25 miles El Dorado County Bicycle Transportation Plan 2010 Update $205,000

10094 El Dorado US 50 Corridor Bike Lanes (Class II) US 50 CorridorClass II bike lanes ‐ Extension of Saratoga Way to connection with Iron Point Road

0.5 miles El Dorado County Bicycle Transportation Plan 2010 Update $150,000

10098 El Dorado US 50 Corridor Bike Lanes (Class II) US 50 CorridorClass II bike lanes ‐ Country Club Drive from Cameron Park Drive to Tierra de Dios


11001 El Dorado US 50 Corridor Bike Route (Class III) US 50 CorridorClass III bike route on Tong Road, Class III bike route on Old Bass Lake Road


11002 El Dorado US 50 Corridor Over/Undercrossing US 50 Corridor Over Crossing of Missouri Flat Road 200 feet El Dorado County Bicycle Transportation Plan 2010 Update 1 million

Page 4 of 59

!!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

PIONE

ER TRLFALLE

N LE

AF RD

TATA LN

CATH

EDRAL RD

BLITZEN RD

D ST

ANGO

RA RI

DGE R

D

SAWMILL RD

MEYERS RD

AL TAHOE BLVD

SKI RUN BLVD

13TH

ST

S KYLINE D

R

ELOISE AVE 3RD ST

LODI AVE

V ENICE DR

KEL LER RD

F ST

LAKE TAHOE BLV

DANITA DR

ZUNI ST

GRASS LAKE RD

MELBA DR

MARTIN AVE

BEAC

H RD

RENO AVE

TALLAC AVEKIC

KAPO

O ST

VIEW

CIR

ECHO LAKES RD

MT TA

LLAC RD

10TH S

T

DEL NORTE ST

LAKEVIEW AVE

PANORAMA DR

STRAWBERRY RD

THUNDERBIRD DR

MARSHALL TRL

MOHICAN DR

SENECA DR

PINE RD

PARK AVE

SCENIC DR

ONEIDAS ST

POMO RD

HERBERT AVE

WEST

WAY

HOPI AVE

WILDWOOD AVE

ONE RING RD

JEWE

LL RD

BORE

N WA

Y

GLEN RD

BEACH DR

GLEN ALPINE RD

CHIAPA DR

SIERRA DR

WASA

BE D

REG

RET W

AY

GLENMORE W

AYSTANFORD AVE

AIRPORT RD

El Dorado County:East

Proposed Multi-Use PathProposed Bike LaneProposed Bike Route

! SchoolsCities


O MO RANCH RD

MOSQUITO RD

MT A

UKUM

RD

C ALDOR RD

AUBU

RN FO

LSOM

RD

LOTU

S RD

SAND RIDGE RD

HAPPY VALLEY RD

CARSON R D

SLY P ARK R

D

MARS HALL RD

LEONI RD

SALM

ON FA

LLS RD

PLEASANT VALL E Y RD

SOUTH SHINGLE RD

G RIZZLY F LA T RD

WISE RD

WHITE ROCK RD

FORNI RD

BAYNE RD

MOTHER LODE DR

TAYL

OR RD

NEWTOW N RD

IRON POINT RD

PONY EXPRESS TRLRATTLESNAKE B

AR RD

KING RD

BEA R CREEK RD

CABL E RD

COLD SPRING S RD

STARKES GRADE RD

ROCK

CREEK RD

FARNHAM RIDGE RD

MORMON EMIGRANT TRL

FRENCH CREEK RD

DEER VALLEY RD

LATROBE RD

RID GE RD

UNNAMED RD

E BIDWELL ST

SLUG GULCH RD

FOREBAY RD

OAK H

I LL RD

E NATOMA ST

FAIR PLAY RD

OPHIR RD

LAIRD RD

CEDAR RAVINE RD

GR EENWOOD RD

D AGOSTINI DR

LU NEMAN RD

PARK CREEK RD

BUCKS BAR RD

HOLL

Y DR

BASS

LAKE RD

CHILI HILL RD

PONDEROSA RD

BROADWAY

PEAV

INE RI

DGE R

D

SWEENEY RD

MEDER RD

CAPPS CROSSING RD

RD8049

MT MURPHY R

D

MEMORY LN

SERRANO PKY

CHINA

HILL

RDCOUN TRY CLUB DR

LYNX TRL

SCIARONI RD

GOLD HILL R D

STAGECOACH RDHASSLER RD

JOAQUIN WAY

GARDEN VALLEY RD

GA LLAGHER RD

INDIAN HILL RD

COTHRIN RANCH RD

DUROCK RD

SPRINGER RD

PENO

BS

COT RD

S AFA R I TRL

PERRY CREEK RD

CEDAR C REEK RD

LEISURE LN

BRANDON RD

DORA

DO CA

NYON

RD

QUARRY RD

WHITE MEADOW RD

BASSI RD

NASH

VILLE

TRLFO

WLE

R LN

BRAD

EN RD

LITTLE CANYON RD

STRIN

G CANYON RD

DICK COOK RD

EMPIRE RANCH RD

HICKO

K RD

BUD LN

SWANSBORO RD

QUARTZ DR

BEATTY DR

MEYE

RS LN

CLEA

R CRE

EK RD

UPTON RD

PEDRO HILL RD

AMBER FIELDS DR

CONNIE LN

WALNUT DRSH

OEM

AKER RD

TRIPP

RD

BEAR ROCK RD

MARI

C RD

PUERTA

DEL SOL

TRAIL GULCH RD

HIGH VIEW DR

MILL RUN

PINE HILL RD

GOLF LINKS DR

FERRARI MILL RD

COPPERTON RD

NEEF LN

BARKLEY RD

PARK DR

BACCHI RD

SOPHIA PKY

ECHO LN

PIPER LNHOLM RD

TEGRA RDDEAN RD

BLARNEY WAY

INDIAN ROCK RD

LUPINE LN

BEAR LN

BOEING RD

RUSSI RD

RD8022

HIGH ST

SAND

S RD

DWYER RD

KELLEY PL

GOLD TRL

MAGGIE LNRANDALL DR

DAKOTA DR

PILOT

CRE

EK LN

AUDUBON DR

DIABLO TRL

DIANA ST

MC KINLEY DRMICA ST

MONT

E MA

R DR

GOLF WAY

OAKVALE DR

LATROB E RD

El Dorado County:West


! SchoolsCities


Appendix B -- Regional Project List and Maps of Bicycle Network

Page 5 of 59



CITY OF AUBURN20248 Placer City of Auburn Multi-use Path (Class I) Auburn Palm Avenue Sidewalk and Bicycle Lane Project TBD TBD Higher Priority

I80 E

I80 W

BELL RD

WISE RD

OPHIR RD

MT VERNON RD

BOWMAN

RD

JOEG

ER RD

BALD

HILL

RD

INDIAN HILL RD

AUBU

RN FO

LSOM

RD

LUTHER RD

ATWOOD RD

NEVA

DA ST

FORESTHILL RD

DRY CREEK RD

LOZA

NOS

RD

MILLERTOWN RD

OLD AIRPORT RD

NEW

AIRP

ORT R

D

AUBU

RN R

AVIN

E RD

DAIRY RD

GLENVIEW RD

1ST ST

BEAN

RD

B AVE

NEWCASTLE RD

CANA

L ST

STATE HWY 49

MUSSO RD

GRAS

S VAL

LEY H

WYELM AVE

HAINES RD

PLAZA WAY

SHIR

LAND

TRAC

T RD

OLD

FORE

STHI

LL ST

HIGH S

TEDGEWOOD RD

MAIDU DR

C AVE

GERALDSON RD

RIVER

VIEW

DR

KEMPER RD

OTTO

SHOCKLEY RDMATSON DR

F AVE

LINCO

LN W

AY

HARR

IS RD

SACR

AMEN

TO ST

RUSSELL RD

PARK DR

ROBIE DR

ERIN

DR

RICH

ARDS

ON D

RLOCKSLEY LN

PACIF

IC AV

E

PALM AVE

LYNN LN

CRATER HILL RD

VINTA

GE W

AY EAGL

ES N

EST

BROO

K RD

QUAIL HILL

DR

SHAN

LEY

RD

OAK R

IDGE

WAY

QUARTZ DR

VINEYARD DR

MIKK

ELSE

N DR

LEES LN

VISTA

CIEL

O DR

BILL FRANCIS DR

NEILS RD

WESL

EY LN

TAYLOR RD

OAK TER

FINLEY ST

AEOLIA DR

EARHART AVE

FLOOD RD

ALI L

N

EDUCATION ST

DRIVE IN WAY

ALTA MESA

GOLD ST

BURT

LN

CHILI HILL RD

CROC

KETT

RD

MORAN CT

PINE ST

FERGUSON RDBU

RLIN

WAY

SUNSET LN

KEENA DR

CHUBB RD

LAND

IS CI

R

SHALE RIDGE LN

COLL

INS D

R

FRON

TIER

RD

HILLVIEW RD

STONE HOUSE RD

WRIGHT RD

LINDA DR

DUNCAN HILL RD

VADA RANCH RD

LILAC LN

STONEY RIDGE RD

MIRACLE DR

RACETRACK ST

MILL

RD

PERRY RANCH RD

BELL BAR RD

IVY LN

GUM LN

OSAGE LN

BEL AIR DR

WALSH ST

ROGERS LN

BORLAND AVE

COVEY RD

POND PL

HIDD

EN C

REEK

DR

PLACER ST

DANIELS DR

ENGLE LN

SKYL

INE D

R

BELL OFF E

KRUEGER DR

WERNER RD

LINDEN AVE

MARCELLA DR

TYLER DR

DESE

RET DR

PARKWAY DR

ROCK CREE

K RD

BLUE LIGHT LN

CHEY

ENNE

LN

BALTIMORE RD

VALLE VISTA CT

LADD LN

HERR

INGT

ON D

R

VOYIATZES RD

SULLIVAN DR

HOYE

R LN

GIN MILL RD

CRICKET LN

MARGUERITE MINE RD

MILL POND RD

DEERBROOKE TRL

E LIN

COLN

WAY

OLYM

PIC W

AYCOPPER PENNY LN

REED

LN

HOPPE L

N

ATWOOD LN

MORAN DR

SILVER BEND WAY

SUEDA RANCH RD

LOVE WAY

QUATTRO PL

BILL CLARK WAY

DUKE

LANA

LN

DYER CT

CASE

Y CT

HUMBUG WAY

TEAL

CT

STAR THISTLE LN

SHADY R

UN

GARTH LN

PALMYRA ST

P AND S LN

DESM

OND LN

SAWYER ST

FOXR

IDGE

CIR

SUTTER ST

VALLEY VISTA LN

UNKNOWN AU

M N M

RD

PAINT DR

CEDA

R ST

TAYL

OR LN

BONNIE LN

VICK CTHIL

LTOP D

R

REDHAWK CT

BLUF

FS P

L

LOWE

LN

HAINES CT

PARK AVE

LINCOLN

WAY

DRY CREEK RD

HIGH ST

RICH

ARDS

ON D

R

Auburn Proposed Multi-Use PathProposed Bike LaneProposed Bike Route

! SchoolsCities



Page 6 of 59



CITY OF COLFAX20002 Placer City of Colfax Bike Lanes (Class II) South Canyon Way

Between I-80 overcrossings at north and south ends of town

1.4 mile City of Colfax Bikeway Master Plan

20003 Placer City of Colfax Bike Lanes (Class II) Highway 174 Auburn Street to Giovanni's Corner (where 174 and Rollins Lake Road split)


20004 Placer City of Colfax Bike Route (Class III) Grass Valley Street Rising Sun Road to Auburn Street 1/4 mile City of Colfax Bikeway Master Plan20005 Placer City of Colfax Bike Route (Class III) Grass Valley Street Auburn Street to Highway 174 1/8 mile City of Colfax Bikeway Master Plan20006 Placer City of Colfax Bike Route (Class III) Oak Street Railroad Avenue to Auburn Street 1/8 mile City of Colfax Bikeway Master Plan20007 Placer City of Colfax Bike Route (Class III) Main Street Highway 174 to Newman Street 1/2 mile City of Colfax Bikeway Master Plan20008 Placer City of Colfax Bike Route (Class III) Railroad Avenue Grass Valley Street to Oak Street 1/8 mile City of Colfax Bikeway Master Plan

20009 Placer City of Colfax Bike Route (Class III) Auburn Street and South Auburn Street

Main Street to I-80 overcrossing at south end of town


20010 Placer City of Colfax Bike Route (Class III) Whitcomb Avenue Entire length 1/3 mile City of Colfax Bikeway Master Plan20011 Placer City of Colfax Bike Route (Class III) Culver Street Newman Street to Church Street 1/8 mile City of Colfax Bikeway Master Plan20012 Placer City of Colfax Bike Route (Class III) Newman Street Culver Street to Main Street <1/8 mile City of Colfax Bikeway Master Plan20013 Placer City of Colfax Bike Route (Class III) Church Street Rising Sun Road to Main Street 1/8 mile City of Colfax Bikeway Master Plan20001 Placer City of Colfax Planning City of Colfax Bicycle & Pedestrian Network Planning City of Colfax General Plan $1,000,000

!!

!

TOKA

YA NA W

AY

N MAIN

ST

S MAIN

ST

PLACER HILLS RD CANYON W

AY

S AUBURN ST

N FO

REST

HILL

ST

E GRASS VALLEY ST

Colfax Proposed Multi-Use PathProposed Bike LaneProposed Bike Route

! SchoolsCities


Multi-use paths not built to Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices standards are not represented on this map.


Page 7 of 59



CITY OF LINCOLN20247 Placer City of Lincoln Multi-use Path (Class I) Markham Ravine Parkway Phase 1 TBD

20249 Placer City of Lincoln Multi-use Path (Class I) Auburn Ravine Some have been completed some have been shelved.

20250 Placer City of Lincoln Multi-use Path (Class I) Nicolaus Rd Aviation Blvd to Waverly Dr. .55 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $826,53920251 Placer City of Lincoln Multi-use Path (Class I) Moore Rd Gap Closure Under Sr 65 .18 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $275,125

20252 Placer City of Lincoln Multi-use Path (Class I) Sewer Access Easement ( 1st Street) Joiner Pkwy to N. O Street 1.16 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $1,742,332

20253 Placer City of Lincoln Multi-use Path (Class I) Village 19 Trail 2 Village 19 Trail 1 to Twelve Bridges Dr. 1.29 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $1,928,82220254 Placer City of Lincoln Multi-use Path (Class I) Village 19 Trail 1 All Links 0.17 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $250,93120255 Placer City of Lincoln Multi-use Path (Class I) Total Village 1 Path All Links 8.39 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $12,578,42820256 Placer City of Lincoln Multi-use Path (Class I) Total Village 7 Path All Links 7.72 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $11,581,043.1720257 Placer City of Lincoln Multi-use Path (Class I) Twelve Bridges Trail Eastridge Drive to End 0.14 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $216,27020258 Placer City of Lincoln Multi-use Path (Class I) Twelve Bridges Trail Eastridge Drvie to End 1.95 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $2,929,54420259 Placer City of Lincoln Multi-use Path (Class I) East Ave 6 St. to 9th St. .27 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $410,71920260 Placer City of Lincoln Multi-use Path (Class I) New Class I Connector Nicolaus Rd to Existing Class 1 Path 2.31 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $3,469,71420261 Placer City of Lincoln Multi-use Path (Class I) Fuller Lane Path Fuller Ln to New Class 1 Connector .18 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $274,67420262 Placer City of Lincoln Multi-use Path (Class I) Class I Connector Exisitng Class 1 to Exisitng Class 1 .12 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $187,13520263 Placer City of Lincoln Bike Lanes (Class II) N Collector St SR 193 to end .29 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $61,60920264 Placer City of Lincoln Bike Lanes (Class II) Ferraro Ranch Rd SR 65 to 4th St. 1.16 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $243,92720265 Placer City of Lincoln Bike Lanes (Class II) 12th Street /Virginia Town Rd Entire Length 1.03 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $216,04120266 Placer City of Lincoln Bike Lanes (Class II) O St. Bike Lanes 1 st St to Nicolaus Rd .72 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $152,18520267 Placer City of Lincoln Bike Lanes (Class II) 3rd St. Bike Lanes East Terminus to West Terminus 2.24 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $471,33420268 Placer City of Lincoln Bike Lanes (Class II) Nicolaus Rd Aviaition Blvd to Waverly Rd .55 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $115,71620269 Placer City of Lincoln Bike Lanes (Class II) East Ave 12th St to 4th St. .73 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $152,73320270 Placer City of Lincoln Bike Lanes (Class II) N Collector St SR 193 to Loop Collector St .27 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $55,86620271 Placer City of Lincoln Bike Lanes (Class II) Loop Collector St. All Links 1.40 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $293,57420272 Placer City of Lincoln Bike Lanes (Class II) S. Collector St Loop Collector St to Oak Tree Ln .19 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $40,33920273 Placer City of Lincoln Bike Lanes (Class II) Aviator Blvd Exisitng Lanes to End .18 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $38,50420274 Placer City of Lincoln Bike Lanes (Class II) Nicolaus Rd City Limitz to Aviation Blvd .88 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $183,85520275 Placer City of Lincoln Bike Lanes (Class II) Gladding Rd 9th St. to New Connector .63 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $131,88820276 Placer City of Lincoln Bike Lanes (Class II) Gladding Rd City Limits to New Connector .22 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $45,53520277 Placer City of Lincoln Bike Lanes (Class II) O St. Bike Lanes 9th to 1st St. .72 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $152,18520278 Placer City of Lincoln Bike Lanes (Class II) 8th St. O St. to E St. .55 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $116,01620279 Placer City of Lincoln Bike Lanes (Class II) 8th St. Joiner Pkwy to O St. .56 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $117,39120280 Placer City of Lincoln Bike Lanes (Class II) 3rd St . City Liimits to D St. 2.24 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $471,33420281 Placer City of Lincoln Bike Lanes (Class II) 1st St. City Limits to Existing Class II Lanes .83 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $175,08220282 Placer City of Lincoln Bike Lanes (Class II) E St. 7th St. to 4th St. .27 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $57,59020283 Placer City of Lincoln Bike Lanes (Class II) Industiral Blvd 1st St. to Athens Rd/ 3.39 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $711,78220284 Placer City of Lincoln Bike Lanes (Class II) Virginiatown Rd East Ave to Hungry Hallow Rd 1.03 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $216,04220285 Placer City of Lincoln Bike Lanes (Class II) G St. Gladding Rd to 7th St . .42 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $88,68120286 Placer City of Lincoln Bike Lanes (Class II) McCourtney Rd Todd Ln to 9th St. .62 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $130,62620287 Placer City of Lincoln Bike Lanes (Class II) Nelson Ln Moore Rd to Nicolaus Rd 2.01 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $421,13420288 Placer City of Lincoln Bike Lanes (Class II) Gladding Ed City Limits to North .61 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $128,66020289 Placer City of Lincoln Bike Lanes (Class II) Moore Rd Nelson Ln to Ferrari Ranch Rd .28 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $58,41420290 Placer City of Lincoln Bike Lanes (Class II) New Connector Gladding Rd to East Ave .57 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $120,16820291 Placer City of Lincoln Bike Lanes (Class II)/NEV Lane (Shared) Gladding Rd. 9th St. to New Connector .64 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $321,79220292 Placer City of Lincoln Bike Lanes (Class II)/NEV Lane (Shared) New Connector Gladding Rd to East Ave .59 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $293,69620293 Placer City of Lincoln Bike Lanes (Class II)/NEV Lane (Shared) Oak Tree Lane Village 1 Plan Boundary to Sierra College Blvd 1.87 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $936,08720294 Placer City of Lincoln Bike Lanes (Class II)/NEV Lane (Shared) Oak Tree Lane SR 193 to Village 1 Plan Boundary .49 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $242,94820295 Placer City of Lincoln Bike Lanes (Class II)/NEV Lane (Shared) SR 193 Oak Tree Ln to Stardust Ln 1.65 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $827,26220296 Placer City of Lincoln Bike Lanes (Class II)/NEV Lane (Shared) Oak Tree Lane Extension Virginiatown Rd to SR 193 1.06 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $528,81520297 Placer City of Lincoln Bike Lanes (Class II)/NEV Lane (Shared) Leaveli Ln SR 193 to Oak Tree Lane Extension 1.04 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $518,49520298 Placer City of Lincoln Bike Lanes (Class II)/NEV Lane (Shared) SR 193 Ferrari Ranch Rd to Oak Tree Ln .69 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $334,75620299 Placer City of Lincoln Bike Lanes (Class II)/NEV Lane (Shared) Ferrari Ranch Rd Caledon Cir to West Edge of Village 7 .79 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $392,55520300 Placer City of Lincoln Bike Lanes (Class II)/NEV Lane (Shared) Moore Rd Ferrari Ranch Rd to East edge of Village 7 .86 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $429,803

20301 Placer City of Lincoln Bike Lanes (Class II)/NEV Lane (Shared) Moore Rd Ferrari Ranch Rd to South Neighborhood Village .85 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $427,055

20302 Placer City of Lincoln Bike Lanes (Class II)/NEV Lane (Shared) Village 7 Eastern Project Rd Ferrari Ramch Rd to South Neighborhood Village .89 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $443,013

20303 Placer City of Lincoln Bike Lanes (Class II)/NEV Lane (Shared) Village 7 Eastern Project Rd Moore Rd to Ferrari Ranch Rd .37 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $182,75620304 Placer City of Lincoln Bike Lanes (Class II)/NEV Lane (Shared) Twelve Bridges Dr Industrial Ave to Colonnade Dr .90 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $448,32620305 Placer City of Lincoln Bike Lanes (Class II)/NEV Lane (Shared) E. Lincoln Pkwy Twelve Bridges Dr to City Limits .97 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $484,07620306 Placer City of Lincoln Bike Lanes (Class II)/NEV Lane (Shared) Del Webb Blvd E Lincoln Pkwy to Gatehouse Ln .15 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $75,60620307 Placer City of Lincoln Bike Lanes (Class II)/NEV Lane (Shared) Del Webb Blvd E Lincoln Pkwy to Ingram Pkwy .24 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $120,52320308 Placer City of Lincoln Bike Lanes (Class II)/NEV Lane (Shared) Sierra College Blvd SR 193 to City Limits 1.86 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $929,71620309 Placer City of Lincoln Bike Lanes (Class II)/NEV Lane (Shared) Ingram Pkwy Ferrari Ranch Ed to Existing Bike Facilities .08 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $39,51820310 Placer City of Lincoln Bike Lanes (Class II)/NEV Lane (Shared) 4 St. E St. to Ferrari Ranch Rd .54 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $268,61220311 Placer City of Lincoln Bike Lanes (Class II)/NEV Lane (Shared) New Roadway Moore Rd to Ferrari Ranch Rd .47 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $235,04020312 Placer City of Lincoln Bike Lanes (Class II)/NEV Lanes (Separated) Colonnade Drive Extension Twelve Bridges Dr. to E Lincoln Pkwy .35 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $173,06520313 Placer City of Lincoln Bike Lanes (Class II)/NEV Lanes (Separated) E St/ Ingram Connector 1st St to Ferrari Ranch Rd .32 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $161,30620314 Placer City of Lincoln Bike Lanes (Class II)/NEV Lanes (Separated) Colonnade Dr. Bella Breze Dr to Lincoln Pkwy .25 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $124,50220315 Placer City of Lincoln Bike Lanes (Class II)/NEV Lanes (Separated) Dresden Dr. Bella Breeze Dr. to Lincoln Pkwy .73 miles City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) $364,156

!!

!

!

! !!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

MOORE RD

ATHENS AVE

NELS

ON LN

E JOI

NER

PKY

VIRGINIATOWN RD

3RD ST

JOINER PKY

FIDDY

MENT

RD

INDU

STRI

AL AV

E

O ST

FERRARI RA NCH RD

NICOLAUS RD

6TH ST

SI ERRA COL LEGE B LVD

P ARK DR

DEL WEBB BLVD

E CATLETT RD

9TH ST

MCCO

URTN

EY R

D

STONERIDGE BLVD

TWELVE BRIDGES DR

EAST

AVE

H ST

FRUITVALE RD

HUN GR Y H O LL OW R D

E 9TH ST

1ST ST

STERLING PKY

MOORE RD

TWELVE BRIDGES DR

NICOLAUS RD

6TH ST

1ST ST

Lincoln Proposed Multi-Use PathProposed Bike LaneProposed Bike Route

! SchoolsCities



Page 8 of 59



CITY OF ROCKLIN20055 Placer City of Rocklin Bike Lanes (Class II) Rocklin Road Meyers St to 5th St TBD20056 Placer City of Rocklin Bike Lanes (Class II) Rocklin Road, Meyer St, Cedar St Granite Dr to Railroad Ave TBD20057 Placer City of Rocklin Bike Lanes (Class II) Rocklin Road Aguilar Rd to Sierra College Blvd TBD20058 Placer City of Rocklin Bike Lanes (Class II) Sierra College Blvd. Wickenby Ct to Rocklin Rd TBD20059 Placer City of Rocklin Bike Lanes (Class II) Sierra College Blvd. Granite Dr to Rocklin Rd TBD20060 Placer City of Rocklin Bike Lanes (Class II) Sierra College Blvd. Granite Dr to Clover Valley Creek TBD20061 Placer City of Rocklin Bike Lanes (Class II) Spring Creek Dr Ranch View Dr to Whitney Ranch PW TBD20062 Placer City of Rocklin Bike Lanes (Class II) Springview Dr Whitney Blvd to Sunset Blvd TBD

20063 Placer City of Rocklin Bike Lanes (Class II) Stanford Ranch Road, Sunset Blvd. Wildcat Blvd to Hwy 65 TBD

20064 Placer City of Rocklin Bike Lanes (Class II) Sunset Blvd. Topaz Ave to Stanford Ranch Rd TBD20065 Placer City of Rocklin Bike Lanes (Class II) Sunset Blvd. Stanford Ranch Rd to Stanford Ranch Rd TBD20066 Placer City of Rocklin Bike Lanes (Class II) Sunset Blvd. Topaz Ave to Pacific St TBD20067 Placer City of Rocklin Bike Lanes (Class II) Sunset Blvd., Woodside Dr Pacific St to Pacific St TBD20068 Placer City of Rocklin Bike Lanes (Class II) Taylor Road Sunset Blvd to I-80 onramp TBD20069 Placer City of Rocklin Bike Lanes (Class II) W Oaks Blvd. Holly Dr TBD20070 Placer City of Rocklin Bike Lanes (Class II) W Oaks Blvd. loop TBD

20071 Placer City of Rocklin Bike Lanes (Class II) Whitney Blvd., Stanford Ranch Road, Five Star Ranch Road

Fairway Dr to Crest Dr TBD

20072 Placer City of Rocklin Bike Lanes (Class II) Whitney Oaks Dr and Park Dr Park Dr to Chimney Ct TBD20073 Placer City of Rocklin Bike Lanes (Class II) Wildcat Blvd. Joiner Pkwy to Ranch View Dr TBD20074 Placer City of Rocklin Bike Lanes (Class II) Wyckford Blvd. Park Dr to Bradford Pl TBD20075 Placer City of Rocklin Bike Route (Class III) Argonaut Avenue Whitney Blvd to Midas Ave TBD20076 Placer City of Rocklin Bike Route (Class III) Del Mar Avenue Alvis Ct to Pacific St TBD20077 Placer City of Rocklin Bike Route (Class III) Farron St Railroad to Pacific St TBD20078 Placer City of Rocklin Bike Route (Class III) Midas Avenue 5th St to Whitney Blvd TBD20079 Placer City of Rocklin Bike Route (Class III) Midas Avenue, San Francisco St 2nd St to Cedar St TBD20080 Placer City of Rocklin Bike Route (Class III) Rocklin Road Sierra College Blvd to St Francis Woods Dr TBD20081 Placer City of Rocklin Bike Route (Class III) San Francisco St Cedar St to Rocklin Rd TBD20082 Placer City of Rocklin Bike Route (Class III) Topaz Avenue Sunset Blvd to Whitney Blvd TBD20083 Placer City of Rocklin Bike Route (Class III) Woodglade Ct Woodside Dr to end TBD

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

INDU

STRI

AL AV

E KING RD

BART

ON R

D

TAYLOR RD

SUNSET BLVD

PARK

DR

ROSEVILLE PKY

GRANITE DR

FAIRWAY DR

BRACE RD

SIERRA COLLEGE BLVD

WASH

INGT

ON BL

VD

PLEAS

ANT G

ROVE

BLVD

BLUE

OAKS BLV

D

WHITN

EY BL

VD

ROCKLIN RD

WILDCAT BLVD

WELLS AVE

LONE TREE BLVD

PACIFIC ST

STANFORD RANCH RD

SWET

ZER

RD

GIBSON DR

HORSESHOE BAR RD

ARCADIA AVE

HALLISSY DR

S WHITNEY BLVD

HIGHLAND PARK DR

HUMP

HREY

RD

ANGELO DR

GALL

ERIA

BLVD

W STANFORD RANCH RDOAK ST

MARGARET DR

W LONETREE BLVD

VETERANS DRCREST DR

STANF

ORD

RANC

H RD

TAYLO

R RD

WILDCAT BLVD

STANFORD R ANCH RD

SUNSET BLVD

Rocklin Proposed Multi-Use PathProposed Bike LaneProposed Bike Route

! SchoolsCities



Page 9 of 59



CITY OF ROSEVILLE20085 Placer City of Roseville Multi-use Path (Class I) Foothill Business Park Diamond Woods to Foothills Blvd .25 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $325,000 Higher Priority20089 Placer City of Roseville Multi-use Path (Class I) Villemont Garden Park Drive to Pleasant Grove Blvd. 0.51 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $663,000 Higher Priority20090 Placer City of Roseville Multi-use Path (Class I) Shea Center Proposed Class I to Existing Class I 0.31 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $403,000 Higher Priority20091 Placer City of Roseville Multi-use Path (Class I) Conference Center to Galleria Existing Class I to Galleria Ci. 0.29 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $377,000 Higher Priority20099 Placer City of Roseville Multi-use Path (Class I) Harding to Royer Lincoln Street to Harding Blvd. 1.10 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $1,430,000 Higher Priority20101 Placer City of Roseville Multi-use Path (Class I) Downtown Specific Plan Royer Park to Lincoln Street 0.3 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $390,000 Higher Priority20109 Placer City of Roseville Multi-use Path (Class I) Riverside to Eastwood & Darling Riverside Ave to Darling Way 1.18 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $2,360,000 Higher Priority20110 Placer City of Roseville Multi-use Path (Class I) Eastwood to Sunrise Eastwood Park to Sunrise Ave. 0.47 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $611,000 Higher Priority20111 Placer City of Roseville Multi-use Path (Class I) Sunrise to Oak Ridge Sunrise Ave. to Oak Ridge Drive 0.28 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $784,000 Higher Priority

20112 Placer City of Roseville Multi-use Path (Class I) Eich Connector Existing Multi-Use Trail to Existing Multi-Use Trail 0.12 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $156,000 Higher Priority

20113 Placer City of Roseville Multi-use Path (Class I) Meadowlark to Rocky Ridge Dr. Meadowlark Way to Rocky Ridge Dr. 0.55 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $1,540,000 Higher Priority20114 Placer City of Roseville Multi-use Path (Class I) Rocky Ridge to Champion Oaks Rocky Ridge Drive to Champion Oaks Dr. 0.82 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $1,066,000 Higher Priority20115 Placer City of Roseville Multi-use Path (Class I) Champion Oaks to City Limits Champion Oaks Dr. to City Limits 0.68 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $1,904,000 Higher Priority20086 Placer City of Roseville Multi-use Path (Class I) North and East Extensions Foothills Blvd to Placer Ranch/Hwy 65 1.78 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $2,314,000 Lower Priority20088 Placer City of Roseville Multi-use Path (Class I) Fairbridge/Grenada Pass Washington Blvd. to Garden Park Ct. 0.19 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $247,000 Lower Priority20092 Placer City of Roseville Multi-use Path (Class I) Highway 65 Crossing 1 Garden Park Ct. to Fairway Dr. 0.38 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $1,064,000 Lower Priority20093 Placer City of Roseville Multi-use Path (Class I) Highway 65 Crossing 2 Proposed Class I to Fairway Dr. 0.95 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $2,660,000 Lower Priority20094 Placer City of Roseville Multi-use Path (Class I) Fiddyment road to Mahany Park Fiddyment Rd. to Existing Class I 0.71 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $923,000 Lower Priority20095 Placer City of Roseville Multi-use Path (Class I) Mahany Park Existing Class I to Existing Class I 0.77 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $1,001,000 Lower Priority

20097 Placer City of Roseville Multi-use Path (Class I) Foothills Boulevard to Washington Foothills Blvd. to Washing Blvd. 0.62 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $806,000 Lower Priority

20100 Placer City of Roseville Multi-use Path (Class I) Secret Ravine Existing Class I to Existing Class I 0.84 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $1,092,000 Lower Priority20084 Placer City of Roseville Multi-use Path (Class I) Veterans Park/ Crocker Ranch Park to Crocker Ranch Road .66 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $858,000 Medium Priority20087 Placer City of Roseville Multi-use Path (Class I) Hewlett Packard Existing Class I to Existing Class I 0.71 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $1,988,000 Medium Priority20098 Placer City of Roseville Multi-use Path (Class I) South Bluff to Washington Proposed Class I to Glenwood Ci. 0.46 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $598,000 Medium Priority20102 Placer City of Roseville Multi-use Path (Class I) Miners Ravine Existing Class I to Europa Street 0.31 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $403,000 Medium Priority20103 Placer City of Roseville Multi-use Path (Class I) Miners Ravine Harding Blvd. to Ant. Creek Trail 0.31 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $403,000 Medium Priority20104 Placer City of Roseville Multi-use Path (Class I) Corporation Yard City Limits to City Limits 0.48 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $624,000 Medium Priority20105 Placer City of Roseville Multi-use Path (Class I) East of Corporation Yard County Limits to County Limits 0.10 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan Medium Priority20106 Placer City of Roseville Multi-use Path (Class I) Placer County Segment City Limits to Atkinson Street 0.27 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $351,000 Medium Priority20107 Placer City of Roseville Multi-use Path (Class I) Union Pacific Atkinson Street to Vernon Street 0.44 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $1,232,000 Medium Priority20108 Placer City of Roseville Multi-use Path (Class I) Vernon to Riverside Vernon Street to Riverside Ave. 0.5 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $1,400,000 Medium Priority20116 Placer City of Roseville Multi-use Path (Class I) Placer County Segment Spahn Ranch to Sierra College Blvd. 1.04 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan20121 Placer City of Roseville Bike Lanes (Class II) Parkside to west of Dover Isle Dover Isle Ct. to Parkside Way 0.13 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $7,935 Higher Priority20130 Placer City of Roseville Bike Lanes (Class II) Antelope Creek Dr. Creekside Ridge Dr. to Proposed Class I 0.33 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $20,052 Higher Priority20131 Placer City of Roseville Bike Lanes (Class II) Cirby Way to City Limits Cirby Way to City Limits 0.64 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $319,016 Higher Priority20133 Placer City of Roseville Bike Lanes (Class II) Lava Ridge Ct. Eureka Rd. to Existing Class I 0.26 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $15,597 Higher Priority20142 Placer City of Roseville Bike Lanes (Class II) Foothills to PFE Foothills Blvd. to PFE Rd. 0.77 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $383,822 Higher Priority20143 Placer City of Roseville Bike Lanes (Class II) Atkinson to City Limits City Limits to March Rd. 0.27 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $135,381 Higher Priority20144 Placer City of Roseville Bike Lanes (Class II) Diamond Creek to McCloud Diamond Creek Blvd. to McCloud Way 0.20 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $98,470 Higher Priority20146 Placer City of Roseville Bike Lanes (Class II) Cirby Way Improvements Foothills Blvd. to Vernon Street 0.21 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $106,173 Higher Priority20123 Placer City of Roseville Bike Lanes (Class II) Foothills Pilgrims Dr. to Baseline Rd. 0.25 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $125,000 Lower Priority20128 Placer City of Roseville Bike Lanes (Class II) McAnally Dr. 0.09 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $5,166 Lower Priority20132 Placer City of Roseville Bike Lanes (Class II) Hackamore to Kaiser Existing Class II to Douglas Blvd. 0.41 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $24,338 Lower Priority20134 Placer City of Roseville Bike Lanes (Class II) Douglas to City Limits Darling Way to Cirby Way 0.47 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $235,320 Lower Priority20135 Placer City of Roseville Bike Lanes (Class II) Vernon to Harding Vernon Street to Harding Blvd. 0.88 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $52,980 Lower Priority20136 Placer City of Roseville Bike Lanes (Class II) Douglas - Sunrise to Rocky Ridge N. Sunrise Ave. to Rocky Ridge Dr. 0.71 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $42,750 Lower Priority

20137 Placer City of Roseville Bike Lanes (Class II) Existing Class II to Washington Blvd.. Csisting Class II to Washington Blvd. 1.01 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $505,000 Lower Priority

20139 Placer City of Roseville Bike Lanes (Class II) Washington to Foothills Foothills Blvd to Washington Blvd. 0.71 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $354,064 Lower Priority20141 Placer City of Roseville Bike Lanes (Class II) Estates to Douglas Estates Dr. to Douglas Blvd. 0.26 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $15,881 Lower Priority20147 Placer City of Roseville Bike Lanes (Class II) Cirby Way Riverside Ave. to Rocky Ridge Dr. 1.87 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $935,021 Lower Priority20117 Placer City of Roseville Bike Lanes (Class II) Washington 0.15 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $495,000 Medium Priority20118 Placer City of Roseville Bike Lanes (Class II) various 9.10 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $13,330,000 Medium Priority20122 Placer City of Roseville Bike Lanes (Class II) North of Blue Oaks City Limits to Rachael Dr. 0.70 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $352,355 Medium Priority20124 Placer City of Roseville Bike Lanes (Class II) Foothills to Highway 65 Niblick Dr. to Alantown Dr. 0.32 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $19,478 Medium Priority20125 Placer City of Roseville Bike Lanes (Class II) Sawtell to RR Tracks Proposed Class I to Derek Pl. 0.45 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $222,825 Medium Priority20126 Placer City of Roseville Bike Lanes (Class II) All American to Church All America City Blvd. to Church St. 0.46 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $27,498 Medium Priority20127 Placer City of Roseville Bike Lanes (Class II) Washington 0.17 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $10,396 Medium Priority20138 Placer City of Roseville Bike Lanes (Class II) Industrial Avenue City limits to Washington Blvd. 2.35 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $1,176,618 Medium Priority20140 Placer City of Roseville Bike Lanes (Class II) I-80 to City Limits City Limits to I-80 0.70 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $348,268 Medium Priority20145 Placer City of Roseville Bike Lanes (Class II) West Roseville 11.16 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $669,600 Medium Priority20148 Placer City of Roseville Bike Lanes (Class II) Parkhill Johnson Ranch Dr. to E. Roseville Pw. 0.32 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $159,544 Medium Priority20149 Placer City of Roseville Bike Lanes (Class II) N. Cirby Champion Oaks Dr. to Stoney Point Way 0.34 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $168,743 Medium Priority20150 Placer City of Roseville Bike Lanes (Class II) N. Cirby Cirby Ranch to Maidu 0.38 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $190,000 Medium Priority

20154 Placer City of Roseville Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Downtown Bike Route Connections Vernon Street, Riverside to Folsom Estates, Shasta 12.89 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $19,335 Higher Priority

20155 Placer City of Roseville Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Downtown Bike Route Connections Diamond Oaks, Oak to Main, Atkinson, Atlantic City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan TBD Higher Priority

20151 Placer City of Roseville Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Parellel to I-80 Cirby, Sunrise, Coloma to Oak Ridge, Santa Clara 5.14 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $7,710 Lower Priority

20152 Placer City of Roseville Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Stoneridge various 2.07 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $3,105 Lower Priority20157 Placer City of Roseville Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Painted Desert Ct. Class I Trail to Kodiak Way 0.10 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan TBD Lower Priority


Page 10 of 59



20162 Placer City of Roseville Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Professional 0.42 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $628 Lower Priority20163 Placer City of Roseville Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Highland Park Dr. 0.73 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $1,093 Lower Priority20164 Placer City of Roseville Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder West Roseville Specific Plan 0.77 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $1,155 Lower Priority

20153 Placer City of Roseville Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Parallel to Cirby Keith, Sandringham to San Simeon, Stonebridge 2.87 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $4,305 Medium Priority

20156 Placer City of Roseville Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Trehowell Pioneer Rd. to Treecrest Ct. 0.60 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan TBD Medium Priority20158 Placer City of Roseville Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Cirby Ranch/Maidu Area various 2.26 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $3,390 Medium Priority20159 Placer City of Roseville Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Coyote Ridge various 1.53 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $2,289 Medium Priority20160 Placer City of Roseville Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Kaseburg - Kingswood various 1.84 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $2,760 Medium Priority20161 Placer City of Roseville Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Foothills Junction various 1.51 miles City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan $2,264 Medium Priority20165 Placer City of Roseville Pedestrian Upgrade Douglas Blvd.. Willow Ave. to Judah Street 190 feet City of Roseville Pedestrian Master Plan $22,864 Higher Priority20166 Placer City of Roseville Pedestrian Upgrade Douglas Blvd.. Gopher Gulch Al. to Willow Ave. 113 feet City of Roseville Pedestrian Master Plan $27,181 Higher Priority20167 Placer City of Roseville Pedestrian Upgrade Douglas Blvd.. Irene Ave to Bing Al. 191 feet City of Roseville Pedestrian Master Plan $22,971 Higher Priority20168 Placer City of Roseville Pedestrian Upgrade Douglas Blvd.. Earl Ave. to Stella Al. 91 feet City of Roseville Pedestrian Master Plan $10,961 Higher Priority20169 Placer City of Roseville Pedestrian Upgrade Douglas Blvd.. Oak Street to Earl Ave 190 feet City of Roseville Pedestrian Master Plan $45,809 Higher Priority20170 Placer City of Roseville Pedestrian Upgrade Douglas Blvd.. Ranier Al. to Clinton Ave. 193 feet City of Roseville Pedestrian Master Plan $23,251 Higher Priority20171 Placer City of Roseville Pedestrian Upgrade Douglas Blvd.. Bing L to Gopher Gulch Al. 79 feet City of Roseville Pedestrian Master Plan $18,981 Higher Priority20172 Placer City of Roseville Pedestrian Upgrade Douglas Blvd.. Judah Street to Buljan Dr. 588 feet City of Roseville Pedestrian Master Plan $52,930 Higher Priority20173 Placer City of Roseville Pedestrian Upgrade Folsom Road Vernon Street to Linda Dr. 494 feet City of Roseville Pedestrian Master Plan $103,881 Higher Priority20174 Placer City of Roseville Pedestrian Upgrade Folsom Road Linda Dr. to Maciel Ave. 492 feet City of Roseville Pedestrian Master Plan $73,827 Higher Priority20175 Placer City of Roseville Pedestrian Upgrade Oak Street Taylor Street to Judah Street 469 feet City of Roseville Pedestrian Master Plan $28,156 Higher Priority

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

ROSEVILLE PKY

FOOT

HILL

S BLV

D

WASHINGTON BLVD

MAIN ST

BLUE OAKS BLVD

PARK DR

INDU

STRI

AL AV

E

FAIRWAY DR

JUNCTION BLVDTAY

LOR R

D

SUNSET BLVD

ATLANTIC ST

DIAMOND OAKS RD

GALL

ERIA

BLVD

EUREKA RD

N SUNRISE AVE

BASELINE RD

GRANITE DR

WHITN

EY B

L VD

SECRET RAVINE PKY

SIERR

A COL

LEGE

BLVD

ALEXANDRA DR

MCANALLY DR

LONE TREE BLVD

PACIFIC ST

BERRY ST

SHASTA ST

PLEASANT GROVE BLVD

STANFORD RANCH RD

HARD

ING BL

VD

GIBSON DR

HALLISSY DR

COUNTR

Y CLU

B DR

CAVIT

T STA

LL

MAN RD

S WHITNEY BLVD

HIGHLAND PARK DR

ROCKY RIDGE DR

YOSEMITE ST

LEAD HILL BLVD OLYMPUS DR

ROCKLIN RD

OLIVE RANCH RD

SCARBOROUGH DR

MEDICAL PLZ

VETERANS DR

NEW

MEA

DOW

DR

JUSTICE CENTER DR CREST DRPARK DR

STANF

ORD

RANC

H RD

SUNSET BLVD

SUNSET BLVD

PLEAS

ANT G

ROVE

BLVD

MEDICAL PLZ

Roseville:North Central


! SchoolsCities


!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

ROSEVILLE PKY

DOUGLAS BLVD

EUREKA RD

CIRBY WAY

FOOT

HILL

S BLV

D

VERNON ST SIERRA COLLEGE BLVD

MAIN ST

ATKIN

SON S

T

WASHINGTON BLVD

TAYLO

R RD

JUNCTION BLVD

ROCK

Y RID

GE D

R

N SUNRISE AVE

VINEYARD RD

ATLANTIC ST

DIAMOND OAKS RD

LEAD HILL BLVD

RIVE

RSID

E AVE

HARD

ING BL

VD

SUNR

ISE A

VE

CHURCH ST

N CIRBY WAY

GALL

ERIA

BLVD

OAK R

IDGE

DR

SECRET RAVINE PKY

ALEXANDRA DR

OLYMP

US DRBASELINE RD

WHYTE AVE

BERRY ST

SHASTA S T

OLD AUBURN RD

CAVIT

T STA

LLMAN RD

MCLAREN D R

MCANALLY DR

OAK ST

PLEASANT GROVE BLVD

FOLSOM RD

ORLA

NDO AVE

PROFESSIONA L DR

OLIVE RANCH RD

BUTT ERNUT DR

JOH NSON RANCH DR

AUBU

RN B

LVD

MELODY

LN

YOSEMITE ST

ROSE

VILLE

RD

S CIRBY WAY

PFE RD

JUDAH ST

SCARBOROUGH DR

WELLINGTON WAY

PARKHILL DR

ESTATES DR

MEDICAL PLZ

N GRANT ST

COUN

TRY CREEK DR

LINCOLN ST

OLD AUBURN RD

SUNR

ISE AVE

ROSEVILLE RD

S CIRBY WAY

MEDICAL PLZ

Roseville:South


! SchoolsCities


!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

BASELINE RD

FIDDY

MENT

RD

BLUE OAKS BLVD

FOOT

HILL

S BLV

D

PLEASANT GROVE BLVD

JUNCTION BLVD

WOOD

CREE

K OAKS BL

VD

INDU

STRI

AL AV

E

HAYDEN PKYDEL WEBB BLVD

MCANALLY DR

WEST BROOK BLVD

MARKET ST

BOB DOYLE DR

COUN

TRY C

LUB D

R

WEST

PARK

DR

MAIN ST

HARVEY WAY

WASH

INGT

ON BL

VD

PARKSIDE WAYBR

OO

KSTONE DR

Roseville:Northwest


! SchoolsCities



Page 11 of 59



PLACER COUNTY20178 Placer Placer County Multi-use Path (Class I) Old Airport Road to Bill Francis Dr. Old Airport Road to Bill Francis Dr. Placer County Regional Bikeway Plan $360,000

20179 Placer Placer County Bike Lanes (Class II) Auburn-Folsom Road. Auburn City limits to Shirland Tract Rd. Placer County Regional Bikeway Plan $360,000

20180 Placer Placer County Bike Lanes (Class II) Cook-Riolo Road.From 800' south of Dry Creek bridge to Dry Creek bridge

Placer County Regional Bikeway Plan $360,000

20181 Placer Placer County Bike Lanes (Class II) PFE Road. Walerga Rd. to Cook-Riolo Rd. Placer County Regional Bikeway Plan $840,00020182 Placer Placer County Bike Route (Class III) Eureka Road. Benton Acres to Wellington Way Placer County Regional Bikeway Plan $1,50020183 Placer Placer County Bike Route (Class III) Meadow Vista Road. Placer Hills to Sherwood Way Placer County Regional Bikeway Plan $2,25020184 Placer Placer County Bike Route (Class III) Eureka Road. Benton Acres to Auburn-Folsom Rd. Placer County Regional Bikeway Plan $1,875

20185 Placer Placer County Combined Projects Dry Creek Parkway Segment 1Dry Creek Greenway Segment 1; Placer-Sacramento County line to Dry Creek-Cirby Creek

Portions included in Placer County Regional Bikeway Plan & City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan

$5,500,000

20186 Placer Placer County Combined Projects Dry Creek Parkway Segment 2Dry Creek Greenway Segment 2; Dry Creek-Galleria - Douglas Blvd

Portions included in Placer County Regional Bikeway Plan & City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan

$6,610,000

20187 Placer Placer County Combined Projects Dry Creek Parkway Segment 3Dry Creek Greenway Segment 3; Cirby Creek- Linda Creek-Swan Stream-Powerline Corridor to Baldwin Reservoir

Portions included in the Placer County Regional Bikeway Plan, & City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan

$4,873,000

20188 Placer Placer County Combined Projects Dry Creek Parkway Segment 4Dry Creek Greenway Segment 4; Local Greenway Connections

$9,790,200

20189 Placer Placer County- Tahoe area Multi-use Path (Class I) Truckee River Corridor--Tahoe City to Town of Truckee

Squaw Valley to Town of TruckeeApproximately

15 milesTruckee River Corridor Access Plan TBD

20190 Placer Placer County- Tahoe area Multi-use Path (Class I) Highway 267 Corridor - Truckee to Tahoe Rim

Town of Truckee to Tahoe Rim near Brockway Summit

Approximately 9.5 miles

Martis Valley Community Plan - 2004 $10,000,000

FORE

STHIL

L RD

R IVER RD

ICE HOUSE RD

W LA

KE BL

VD

17N12

B OTTLE HILL RD

NORTH SHORE BL VD

N LAKE BLVD

VOLCANOVILLE RD

WENTW

ORTH SPRINGS RD

14N07

KIDD LAKES RD

MAIN ST

ALPINE MEADOWS RDSQUAW VALLEY RD

COURCHEVEL RD

GREEN LE

AF LN

RUBICON RD

SHANTI LN

BOTTLE HILL RD

WENTWORTH SPRINGS RD

W LAKE BLVD

Placer County:East


! SchoolsCities


Unpaved trails in Placer County are not represented on this map.

WISE RD

FORESTHILL RD

BELL RD

AUBURN FOL

SOM R

D

LOTU

S RD

KING RD

MOORE RD

MCCOURTNEY RD

TAYLOR R

D

NICOLAUS RD

BARTO N R D

PFE RD

MARSHALL RD

SALM

ON FA

LLS RD

N DO

WD

RD

MT V ERNON RD

BASELINE RD

INDU

STRI

AL AV

E

ELVERTA RD

E CATLETT RD

B A YNE RDLAIRD RD

FIDDY

MENT

RD

RATTLESNAKE BAR RD

SUNSET BLVD W

RIDG E RD

COLD SPRINGS R D

PLAC

ER HI LLS R

D

FRUIT VALE RD

DRY CREEK RD

APPL

EGAT

E RD

WATT

AVE

KARC

HNER

RD

DOUGLAS BLVD

CAMP FAR WES

T RD

OPHIR RDGREENWOOD RD

LU NEMAN RD

CHILI HILL RD

CIRBY WAYDEER VALLEY RD

HORSESHOE BAR RD

SLIGER MINE RD

VINEYARD RD

BO TTLE HILL RD

RIOSA RD

JOEG

ER RD

JUNCTION B LVD

BOWM

AN RD

WEST WISE RD

VERNON ST

NEWCASTLE RD

ROSEVILLE PKY

MT MURPH

Y RD

PONDEROSA WAY

SPENCEVILLE RD

DALB EY RD

ATHENS AVE

RESERVOIR RD

NELS

ON LN

E JOINER PKY

S DOW

D RD

SWEETWATER TRL

CAVITT STALLMAN RD GOLD HILL R D

VIRGINIATOWN RD

MAIN ST

CLARK TUNN EL RD

STAGECOACH RD

3RD ST

INDIAN HILL RD

GARDEN VALLEY RD

BASE LINE RD

PENO

BSCOT RD

SAFAR I TRL

PARK

DR

GREEN VALLEY RD

HWY 65

GRANITE DR

ATWOOD RD

NEVADA ST

N HWY 65

ENGLISH COL ONY WAY

ANDY WOLF RD

SPANISH DRY DIGGINS RD

BASSI RD

ROSEVILLE R

D

CLARK MOUNTA IN RD

N

LOOP BLVD

SYD RD

HUMPHREY RD

BUD LN

BRACE RD

BAXT

ER GRADE

6TH ST

SPRINGVALE RD

PEDRO HILL RD

LEAD HILL BLVD

PINE HILL RD

FAIR LNMISSOURI FLAT RD

OLD AUBURN FORESTHILL RD

GREEN LE

AF LN

COON CREEK RD

DAIRY RD

W WISE RD

MCANALLY DR

BACCHI RD

N HA

YDEN PKYWESTBROOK BLVD

N CIRBY WAY

STANLEY DR

WHITNEY BLVD

OAK RIDGE DR

CHALET WAY

JAYHAWK DR

ROCKLIN RD

TEGRA RD

BLARNEY WAY

INDIAN ROCK RD

MAIDU DR

WILDCAT BLVD

SAND

S RD

FAIR

PINE

S LN

9TH ST

EQUESTRIAN WAY

DAKOTA DR

PACIFIC ST

PILOT

CRE

EK LN

FAIRWAY DR

OLD AUBURN RD

KATHY LN

BROWNS RD

MC KINLEY DR

JILLTREE LN

EAST

AVE

HOMESTEAD RD

PERSIA LN

HALLISSY DR

SUNSET BLVD

RIOSA RD

MAIN ST

GREEN VALLEY RD

HWY 65

Placer County:West


! SchoolsCities


Unpaved trails in Placer County are not represented on this map.


Page 12 of 59



TOWN OF LOOMIS20200 Placer Town of Loomis Multi-use Path (Class I) Taylor Road Circle Drive to Walnut Street Town of Loomis Bicycle Trasportation Plan 2010 $30,929 Higher Priority20203 Placer Town of Loomis Multi-use Path (Class I) Taylor Road King Road to Loomis Tributary 2378 feet Town of Loomis Bicycle Trasportation Plan 2010 $16,028 Higher Priority20205 Placer Town of Loomis Multi-use Path (Class I) Taylor Road Sierra College Blvd to King Road 6505 feet Town of Loomis Bicycle Trasportation Plan 2010 $185,385 Higher Priority20206 Placer Town of Loomis Multi-use Path (Class I) Taylor Road King Road to Loomis Town limit 5217 feet Town of Loomis Bicycle Trasportation Plan 2010 $63,442 Higher Priority

20244 Placer Town of Loomis Multi-use Path (Class I) Secret Ravine Creek Adjacent Path Brace Road to Loomis Ton limit (north of Brace) 4456 feet Town of Loomis Bicycle Trasportation Plan 2010 TBD Lower Priority

20245 Placer Town of Loomis Multi-use Path (Class I) Sun Knoll Drive Extension End of Sun Knoll Drive to Library Drive Extension Town of Loomis Bicycle Trasportation Plan 2010 TBD Lower Priority

20191 Placer Town of Loomis Bike Lanes (Class II) Sierra College Blvd. Loomis Town limit to King Road 2614 feet Town of Loomis Bicycle Trasportation Plan 2010 $17,493 Higher Priority20192 Placer Town of Loomis Bike Lanes (Class II) Sierra College Blvd. King Road to Bankhead Road 4753 feet Town of Loomis Bicycle Trasportation Plan 2010 $31,234 Higher Priority20193 Placer Town of Loomis Bike Lanes (Class II) Sierra College Blvd. Bankhead Road to Taylor Road 1614 feet Town of Loomis Bicycle Trasportation Plan 2010 $11,283 Higher Priority20195 Placer Town of Loomis Bike Lanes (Class II) King Road Sierra College Blvd to Opel Ln 1357 feet Town of Loomis Bicycle Trasportation Plan 2010 $10,145 Higher Priority20196 Placer Town of Loomis Bike Lanes (Class II) King Road Opel Ln to Paloma Dr. 1552 feet Town of Loomis Bicycle Trasportation Plan 2010 $156,002 Higher Priority20197 Placer Town of Loomis Bike Lanes (Class II) King Road Paloma Dr. to Taylor Road 4567 feet Town of Loomis Bicycle Trasportation Plan 2010 $33,741 Higher Priority20198 Placer Town of Loomis Bike Lanes (Class II) King Road Taylor Road to Route 80 3647 feet Town of Loomis Bicycle Trasportation Plan 2010 $27,056 Higher Priority20199 Placer Town of Loomis Bike Lanes (Class II) Taylor Road Loomis Town limit to Sierra College Blvd 1293 feet Town of Loomis Bicycle Trasportation Plan 2010 $9,234 Higher Priority20201 Placer Town of Loomis Bike Lanes (Class II) Taylor Road Walnut Street to Webb Street 916 feet Town of Loomis Bicycle Trasportation Plan 2010 $8,843 Higher Priority20202 Placer Town of Loomis Bike Lanes (Class II) Taylor Road Webb Street to King Road 1070 feet Town of Loomis Bicycle Trasportation Plan 2010 $8,250 Higher Priority20204 Placer Town of Loomis Bike Lanes (Class II) Taylor Road Loomis Tributary to Loomis Town limit 2839 feet Town of Loomis Bicycle Trasportation Plan 2010 $18,337 Higher Priority20216 Placer Town of Loomis Bike Lanes (Class II) Arcadia Avenue Humphrey Road to King Road 3907 feet Town of Loomis Bicycle Trasportation Plan 2010 $10,586 Lower Priority20224 Placer Town of Loomis Bike Lanes (Class II) Humphrey Road Arcadia Ave to King Road 2460 feet Town of Loomis Bicycle Trasportation Plan 2010 $7,629 Lower Priority20226 Placer Town of Loomis Bike Lanes (Class II) Margaret Drive Sparas Street to King Road 2050 feet Town of Loomis Bicycle Trasportation Plan 2010 $7,997 Lower Priority20227 Placer Town of Loomis Bike Lanes (Class II) Laird Road Brace Road to Horseshoe Bar Road 347 feet Town of Loomis Bicycle Trasportation Plan 2010 $33,036 Lower Priority20229 Placer Town of Loomis Bike Lanes (Class II) Laird Street Horseshoe Bar Road to Webb Street 380 feet Town of Loomis Bicycle Trasportation Plan 2010 $2,167 Lower Priority20230 Placer Town of Loomis Bike Lanes (Class II) Library Drive Horseshoe Bar Road to End of Library Drive 395 feet Town of Loomis Bicycle Trasportation Plan 2010 $1,064 Lower Priority20231 Placer Town of Loomis Bike Lanes (Class II) Rocklin Road Loomis Town limit to Barton Road 2594 feet Town of Loomis Bicycle Trasportation Plan 2010 $120,382 Lower Priority20234 Placer Town of Loomis Bike Lanes (Class II) Sparas Street Arcadia Ave to Arcadia Ave 1845 feet Town of Loomis Bicycle Trasportation Plan 2010 $4,921 Lower Priority20240 Placer Town of Loomis Bike Lanes (Class II) Webb Street King Road to Laird Street 1755 feet Town of Loomis Bicycle Trasportation Plan 2010 $89,061 Lower Priority20243 Placer Town of Loomis Bike Lanes (Class II) Library Drive Extension End of Library Drive to King Road Town of Loomis Bicycle Trasportation Plan 2010 TBD Lower Priority20246 Placer Town of Loomis Bike Lanes (Class II) Webb Street Extension Laird Street to Library Drive Extension Town of Loomis Bicycle Trasportation Plan 2010 TBD Lower Priority20207 Placer Town of Loomis Bike Lanes (Class II) Horseshoe Bar Road Taylor Road to Route 80 2100 feet Town of Loomis Bicycle Trasportation Plan 2010 $14,766 Medium Priority20208 Placer Town of Loomis Bike Lanes (Class II) Horseshoe Bar Road Route 80 to Laird Road 3033 feet Town of Loomis Bicycle Trasportation Plan 2010 $303,692 Medium Priority20212 Placer Town of Loomis Bike Lanes (Class II) Brace Road Sierra College Blvd to Laird Road 6570 feet Town of Loomis Bicycle Trasportation Plan 2010 $592,118 Medium Priority20214 Placer Town of Loomis Bike Lanes (Class II) Brace Road Sierra College Blvd to Laird Road 6570 feet Town of Loomis Bicycle Trasportation Plan 2010 $592,118 Medium Priority20194 Placer Town of Loomis Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder King Road Delmar Ave to Sierra College Blvd 643 feet Town of Loomis Bicycle Trasportation Plan 2010 $690 Higher Priority20215 Placer Town of Loomis Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Angelo Drive Swetzer Road to Arcadia Avenue 2851 feet Town of Loomis Bicycle Trasportation Plan 2010 $2,070 Lower Priority20217 Placer Town of Loomis Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Bankhead Road Sierra College Blvd to King Road 3754 feet Town of Loomis Bicycle Trasportation Plan 2010 $1,380 Lower Priority20218 Placer Town of Loomis Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Boyington Road King Road to Chisom Trail 1107 feet Town of Loomis Bicycle Trasportation Plan 2010 $1,380 Lower Priority20219 Placer Town of Loomis Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Brace Road Laird Road to Laird Road 531 feet Town of Loomis Bicycle Trasportation Plan 2010 $690 Lower Priority20220 Placer Town of Loomis Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Day Avenue King Road to David Ave 745 feet Town of Loomis Bicycle Trasportation Plan 2010 $1,380 Lower Priority20221 Placer Town of Loomis Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Delmar Avenue Loomis Town limit to Loomis Town limit 7928 feet Town of Loomis Bicycle Trasportation Plan 2010 $4,485 Lower Priority20222 Placer Town of Loomis Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Dias Ln Loomis Town limit to Loomis Town limit 2163 feet Town of Loomis Bicycle Trasportation Plan 2010 $1,380 Lower Priority20223 Placer Town of Loomis Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Humphrey Road Loomis Town limit to Arcadia Ave 2013 feet Town of Loomis Bicycle Trasportation Plan 2010 $1,380 Lower Priority20225 Placer Town of Loomis Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Magnolia Street Walnut Street to Horseshoe Bar Road 458 feet Town of Loomis Bicycle Trasportation Plan 2010 $1,380 Lower Priority20228 Placer Town of Loomis Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Laird Road Brace Road to Loomis Town limits 5232 feet Town of Loomis Bicycle Trasportation Plan 2010 $2,760 Lower Priority20232 Placer Town of Loomis Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Rutherford Canyon Road Barton Road to Laird Road 6118 feet Town of Loomis Bicycle Trasportation Plan 2010 $4,140 Lower Priority20233 Placer Town of Loomis Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Saunders Avenue Bankhead Road to Webb Street 4672 feet Town of Loomis Bicycle Trasportation Plan 2010 $2,070 Lower Priority20235 Placer Town of Loomis Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Stone Road Brace Road to End of Stone Road 1363 feet Town of Loomis Bicycle Trasportation Plan 2010 $1,380 Lower Priority20236 Placer Town of Loomis Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Sun Knoll Drive King Road to End of Sun Knoll Drive 1109 feet Town of Loomis Bicycle Trasportation Plan 2010 $2,070 Lower Priority20237 Placer Town of Loomis Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Swetzer Road King road to Loomis town limit 4003 feet Town of Loomis Bicycle Trasportation Plan 2010 $3,105 Lower Priority20238 Placer Town of Loomis Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Thornwood Drive Laird Street to Sun Knoll Drive 1386 feet Town of Loomis Bicycle Trasportation Plan 2010 $2,415 Lower Priority20239 Placer Town of Loomis Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Walnut Street Taylor Road to end of Walnut Street 2317 feet Town of Loomis Bicycle Trasportation Plan 2010 $2,070 Lower Priority20241 Placer Town of Loomis Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Wells Avenue Barton Road to Morgan Place 5300 feet Town of Loomis Bicycle Trasportation Plan 2010 $1,725 Lower Priority20242 Placer Town of Loomis Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Connector Road Walnut Street to Stone Road Town of Loomis Bicycle Trasportation Plan 2010 TBD Lower Priority20209 Placer Town of Loomis Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Horseshoe Bar Road Horseshoe Bar Road to Loomis Town limits 1410 feet Town of Loomis Bicycle Trasportation Plan 2010 $72,866 Medium Priority20210 Placer Town of Loomis Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Barton Road Brace Road to Route 80 2100 feet Town of Loomis Bicycle Trasportation Plan 2010 $677,729 Medium Priority20211 Placer Town of Loomis Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Brace Road Taylor Road to Sierra College Blvd 850 feet Town of Loomis Bicycle Trasportation Plan 2010 $1,380 Medium Priority20213 Placer Town of Loomis Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Brace Road Taylor Road to Sierra College Blvd 850 feet Town of Loomis Bicycle Trasportation Plan 2010 $1,380 Medium Priority

I80 E

I80 W

KING RD

LAIRD RD

TAYLOR RD

BART

ON R

D

DELM

AR AV

E

ROCKLIN RD

BRACE RD

GRANITE DR

WELLS AVE

PARK

DR

SIERR

A COL

LEGE

BLV

D

RIPPE

Y RD

PENR

YN R

D

SWET

ZER

RD

HUMP

HREY

RD

BANK

HEAD

RD SAUNDERS AVE

LONGVIEW DR

BOYINGTON RD

GROV

E ST

DIAS

LN

CHINA GARDEN RD

NUTE RD

EL D

ON D

R

MORG

AN PL

DELL PL

ARCA

DIA A

VE

HIGH S

T

GREENBRAE RD

HORSESHOE BAR RD

RUTHERFORD CANYON RD

ARGO

NAUT

AVE

AGUI

LAR

RD

OAK RIDGE DR

JAME

S DR

ANGELO DR

RIDGE PARK DR

NO N

AME

LN

PACIFIC ST

WEBB ST

ECHO RIDGE RD

MONT

E CL

AIRE

LN

BARK

ER R

D

S GRO

VE ST

INDIAN SPRINGS RD

KATH

Y WAY

CLOV

ER VA

LLEY

RD

RAWHIDE RD

PINE ST

CEDAR ST

DEL M

AR AV

E

ONG

PL

SPARAS ST

HIGH CLIFF RD

MARETA LN

TUMB

LE LN

CHISO

M TR

L

WHITE LN

ALVIS CT

TENBURY LN

OAK ST

LAIRD ST

DOMINGUEZ RD

OAK T

REE L

N

TUTTLE DR

CASA VISTA DR

GRANITE OAKS LN

S WALNUT ST

ROCKLIN OFF E

SOUTHSIDE RANCH RD

WINTER LN

SWEE

TWAT

ER D

R

AITKEN DAIRY RD

DUST

Y LN

LA VISTA DR

OPAL

LN

SIERRA C

OLLEGE O

N W

MEYE

RS S

T

HAPP

Y RD

GADE LN

BERG LN

SHAMBAUGH LN

HIDDE

N GLE

N DR

WAYLAND RD

BROOKS LN

MART

IN LN

CROSSINGS PKY

SCHA

TZ LN

ARABIAN LN

FROS

T LN

COLV

IN D

R

GALAXY LN

BUSH LN

SIERRA C

OLLEGE O

N E

LAIRD HILL DR

ROCKLIN OFF W

DAY A

VE

FRANCIS DR

WATER LILY LN

GRAZING LN

TANU

S CIR

SURETTE LN

SAIN

T FRA

NCIS

CIR

E

CREE

KSIDE

DR

FOOT

HILL

RD

WALNUT ST

SAIN

T FRA

NCIS

CIR

W

ANGELO CT

CLOVER RANCH LN

E MIDAS AVE

CARL

ILE D

R

CHER

OKEE

TRL

CLAYTON LN

LAKEPOINTE DR

BOUL

DER R

IDGE R

D

RUSTIC HILLS DR

HOLSCLAW RD

LUCK

Y LN

EL CID DR

ANTE

LOPE

WAY

SUN

KNOL

L DR

BETT

Y LN

BARR

INGT

ON H

ILLS D

R

KATIE LN

NAPOLEON DR

HUNT

ERS D

R

RACE

TRAC

K CIR

CIRCUIT DR

RONNIE LN

WISHING WELL WAY

TAMARACK DR

TUDO

R WAY

BALT

IC CIR

LOS F

LORE

S RD

PALO

MA D

R

MONTCLAIR CIR

CIRCLE DR

BLACKHAWK CT

RACE

TRAC

K RD

INDEPENDENCE PL

ORCH

ARD

PARK

WAY

MANZANITA DR

LEMONHILL DR

GROV

E CT

RICKETY RACK RD

COLO

NY LN

CASS

ELL L

N

ANTHONY CT

EVANS DR

CHELSEA PL

HOPE WAY

CONNIE CT

GOLD TRAIL WAY

LAKE

BREE

ZE D

R

TWIN

PALM

S LN

KOBERLEIN RD

CAGL

E LN

NEBULA CT

MARCOB WAY

FREE

MAN

CIR

BETH

EL C

T

PEGASUS CT

CLOV

ER VA

LLEY

RD

Loomis Proposed Multi-Use PathProposed Bike LaneProposed Bike Route

! SchoolsCities



Page 13 of 59



CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS30001 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Multi-use Path (Class I) I-80 Xing Saybrook-Misty Creek City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30002 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Multi-use Path (Class I) Carriage Elementary City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30003 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Multi-use Path (Class I) Carriage Elementary City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30004 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Multi-use Path (Class I) Old Auburn Road City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30005 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Multi-use Path (Class I) Twin Oaks Avenue City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30006 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Lanes (Class II) Butternut Drive City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30007 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Lanes (Class II) Zenith Drive City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30008 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Lanes (Class II) Antelope Road City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30009 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Lanes (Class II) Rollingwood Boulevard City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30010 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Lanes (Class II) Auburn Boulevard City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30011 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Lanes (Class II) Sunrise Boulevard City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30012 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Lanes (Class II) Auburn Boulevard City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30013 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Lanes (Class II) Mariposa Avenue City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30014 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Lanes (Class II) Farmgate Way City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30015 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Lanes (Class II) Birdcage Street City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30016 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Lanes (Class II) Macy Plaza Drive City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30017 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Lanes (Class II) Old Auburn Road City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30018 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Lanes (Class II) Fair Oaks Boulevard City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30019 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Lanes (Class II) Villa Oak Drive City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30020 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Lanes (Class II) Olivine Avenue City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30021 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Lanes (Class II) Madison Avenue City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30022 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Lanes (Class II) Old Auburn Road City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30023 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Lanes (Class II) Saybrook Drive City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30024 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Lanes (Class II) Tupelo Drive City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30025 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Lanes (Class II) Lauppe Lane City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30026 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Lanes (Class II) Carriage Drive City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30027 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Lanes (Class II) Twin Oaks Avenue City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30028 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Lanes (Class II) Twin Oaks Avenue City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30029 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Lanes (Class II) Twin Oaks Avenue City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30030 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Lanes (Class II) Roseville Road City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30031 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Lanes (Class II) Fair Oaks Boulevard City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30032 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Lanes (Class II) Fair Oaks Boulevard City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30033 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Lanes (Class II) Sunrise Boulevard City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30034 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Lanes (Class II) Antelope Road City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30035 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Lanes (Class II) Van Maren Lane City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30036 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Lanes (Class II) Van Maren Lane City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30037 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Lanes (Class II) Olivine Avenue City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30038 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Lanes (Class II) Greenback Lane City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30039 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Lanes (Class II) Greenback Lane City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30040 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Lanes (Class II) Misty Creek Drive City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30041 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Lanes (Class II) Calvin Drive City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30042 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Lanes (Class II) Kingswood Drive City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30043 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Lanes (Class II) Celine Drive City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30044 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Lanes (Class II) Treecrest Avenue City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30045 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Route (Class III) Highland Avenue City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30046 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Route (Class III) Cessna Drive City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30047 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Route (Class III) Watson Way City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30048 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Route (Class III) NorthLea Way City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30049 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Route (Class III) Westgate Drive City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30050 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Route (Class III) Farmgate Way City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30051 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Route (Class III) Primrose Drive City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30052 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Route (Class III) Macy Plaza City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30053 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Route (Class III) Lichen Drive City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30054 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Route (Class III) Whyte Avenue City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30055 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Route (Class III) Vernon Street City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30056 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Route (Class III) Mariposa Avenue City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30057 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Route (Class III) Olivine Avenue City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30058 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Route (Class III) Macy Plaza City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30059 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Route (Class III) Lichen Drive City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30060 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Route (Class III) Whyte Avenue City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30061 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Route (Class III) Vernon Street City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30062 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Route (Class III) Mariposa Avenue City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD30063 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Bike Route (Class III) Olivine Avenue City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan 2011 TBD

!

! !

!

!

!

! !

!!

!!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

! !!

!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

GREENBACK LN

AUBU

RN B

LVD

MADISON AVE

ANTELOPE RD

SUNR

ISE B

LVD

OAK AVE

OLD AUBURN RD

FAIR

OAK

S BL

VD

ALMO

ND AV

E

HICK

ORY A

VE

D IABLO DR VAN

MARE

N LN

LICHEN DR

ROSEVILL

E RD

DEW

EY D

R

TUPELO D R

GARF

IELD

AVE

COYLE AVE SAN

JUAN

AVE

TR A JAN DR

SYLV

AN R

DCENTRAL AVE

CALVIN DR

BIRD C

A GE S

T

NAVIO

N DR

ANTE

LOPE

NOR

TH R

D

ZENITH DRPRATT AVE

WATSON WAY

PALM ERSON DR

ANDREA B

LVD

WHYTE AVE

TEMPLETON DR

SPER

RY DR

PALM AVE

SAYBRO OK DR

LINDA SUE WAY

RUSCH DRCARRIAGE DR

PARKOAK S D R

OLIVINE AVE

LA RWIN DR

COBA LT WAY

MANZ

ANITA

AVE

WOODMORE OAKS DR

VILLA OAK DR

PERSHING AVE

BUTTER NUT DR

ELKHORN BLVD

HEMLO

CK ST

ELM AVE

CHESLINE DR

SAYO

NARA DR

MCKA

Y ST

TREECREST AVE

LINCOLN OAKS DR

STOCK RANC H RD

RAINTREE DR

CROSSWOODS CIR

SKYLANE DR

BR OOKTR EE D

R

MENKE WAY

ARCADIA DR

PIPPIN WAY

HACK

BERR

Y LN

KING

SWOOD DR

SUNRISE VISTA DR

WIN TERG REEN D R

CA NELO H ILLS DR

HALIFAX ST

SPRU

CE AV

E

SAN SIMEON DRDONEGA L DR

STRONG AVE

VIA CASITAS

CELINE DR

FOUN

TAIN

SQUA

RE D

R

MISTY CREEK DR

GRADY DR

GL EN CREE K WAY

LONG

FORD

DR

SKYVIEW DR

TO OM BS ST

RINCON ADA DR

MANSFIELD DR

MACY PLAZA DR

HAYW

ORTH

LN

DESIMONE LN

GLEN BRIAR DR

PALM AVE

ROSEVILLE RD

KINGSWOOD DR

Citrus Heights Proposed Multi-Use PathProposed Bike LaneProposed Bike Route

! SchoolsCities



Page 14 of 59



CITY OF ELK GROVE

30064 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Multi-use Path (Class I) Elk Grove CreekPave trail from Emerald Vista Dr. to Elk Grove-Florin Rd

1.25 City of Elk Grove Trails Master Plan $1,000,000 Higher Priority

30065 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Multi-use Path (Class I) Laguna CreekCamden Point and Camden Estates neighborhoods to Camden Trail and California Family Fitness at Bond Rd.

0.5City of Elk Grove Trails Master Plan $1,000,000 -

$2,000,000Higher Priority

30066 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Multi-use Path (Class I) Laguna Creek Lewis Stein to Bruceville; both sides of creek 1City of Elk Grove Trails Master PlanElk Grove Community Services District

$1,000,000 Higher Priority

30067 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Multi-use Path (Class I) Laguna Creek State Route 99 to Camden Park Greenbelt 1City of Elk Grove Trails Master PlanElk Grove Community Services District

$1,000,000 - $3,000,000

Higher Priority

30070 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Multi-use Path (Class I) Powerline Trail Calvine Rd to Grant Line Rd 4.6 City of Elk Grove Trails Master Plan$4,000,000 - $8,000,000

Higher Priority

30071 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Multi-use Path (Class I) Wackman Park TrailElk Spring Way to Laguna Creek Trail/City of Sacramento

0.6 City of Elk Grove Trails Master Plan $1,000,000 Higher Priority

30072 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Multi-use Path (Class I) Wackman Park Trail Wackman Park to Tegan Road 0.25 City of Elk Grove Trails Master Plan$500,000 - $750,000

Higher Priority

31138 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Multi-use Path (Class I) Strawberry Creek Power Inn Rd to Jones Park 2 City of Elk Grove Trails Master Plan$1,000,000 - $3,000,000

Higher Priority

30069 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Multi-use Path (Class I) Laguna Creek Garrity Drive to Laguna Creek/Camden Trail 0.25 City of Elk Grove Trails Master Plan$1,000,000 - $2,000,000

Lower Priority

30073 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Multi-use Path (Class I) White House Creek Waterman Rd. to Springhurst Dr. 1.5 City of Elk Grove Trails Master Plan$1,000,000 - $3,000,000

Lower Priority

30097 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Multi-use Path (Class I) Elk Grove Creek Trail bridge crossing at Oneto Park 0.1 City of Elk Grove Trails Master Plan$1,000,000 - $5,000,000

Lower Priority

30100 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Multi-use Path (Class I) Elk Grove Creek Falcon Meadow Dr to Elk Grove-Florin Rd 0.75 City of Elk Grove Trails Master Plan. $1,000,000 Medium Priority

31142 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Multi-use Path (Class I) Stone Lakes and I-5 Levee Bobbell Dr to Elk Grove Blvd 1.5 City of Elk Grove Trails Master Plan$1,000,000 - $3,000,000

Medium Priority

31136 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Bike Lanes (Class II) Elk Grove - city-wideLocal recreational and fitness bike loops; signing and striping

30 City of Elk Grove Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan$100,000 - $500,000

Higher Priority

30074 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Bike Lanes (Class II) Bader Road Bond Rd to Calvine Rd 2 City of Elk Grove Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan TBD Medium Priority30075 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Bike Lanes (Class II) Corfu Drive Excelsior Rd to Central CA Traction RR 1.25 City of Elk Grove Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan TBD Medium Priority30076 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Bike Lanes (Class II) Pleasant Grove School Road Bader Rd to Grant Line Rd 1.3 City of Elk Grove Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan TBD Medium Priority30077 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Bike Lanes (Class II) Sleepy Hollow Lane Sheldon Rd to Corfu Dr 0.8 City of Elk Grove Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan TBD Medium Priority31139 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Bike Lanes (Class II) Bond Road Bradshaw Rd to Grant Line Rd. 1.4 City of Elk Grove Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan TBD Medium Priority31140 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Bike Lanes (Class II) Bradshaw Road. Bond Rd to Calvine Rd 2 City of Elk Grove Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan TBD Medium Priority31141 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Bike Lanes (Class II) Sheldon Rd Waterman Rd. to Grant Line Rd. 3.25 City of Elk Grove Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan TBD Medium Priority

30092 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Bike/Pedestrian Upgrade Powerline TrailShortcuts: Pave Connector and curb cuts at Waterman Grove

0.1 City of Elk Grove Trails Master Plan TBD Lower Priority

30099 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Combined Projects Elk Grove Creek and State Route 99(Multi-use Trail (Class I) and Overcrossing): Laguna Springs to W. Stockton, overcrossing at SR 99, E. Stockton to Emerald Vista

0.65City of Elk Grove Trails Master Plan *Funded by CMAQ, SR2S, and Local funds. Construction planned Summer 2012-2013


30078 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Combined Projects Elk Grove - city-wide Gage St - Elk Grove Blvd to Truman St;Walnut Ave - El Varies Elk Grove Community Services District $2,400,000 Medium Priority

30081 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Over/Undercrossing State Route 99 Between Sheldon & Bond Rd. at Laguna Creek 0.1 City of Elk Grove Trails Master Plan 000,000 - $10,000, Higher Priority30083 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Over/Undercrossing Grantline Road/UPRR Railroad Overcrossing at Grant Line Rd/UPRR betwee 0.1 City of Elk Grove Trails Master Plan TBD Higher Priority

30080 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Over/Undercrossing State Route 99 Between Elk Grove Blvd. and Grant Line Rd 0.1 Laguna Ridge Specific Plan$5,000,000 - $10,000,000

Lower Priority

30082 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Over/Undercrossing Bond Road and Waterman RoadUndercrossing connecting to Laguna Creek Trail and Powerline Trail systems and local roads

0.1 City of Elk Grove Trails Master Plan$1,000,000 - $5,000,000

Medium Priority

30087 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Pedestrian Upgrade West Stockton Blvd.Laguna Palms Way to shopping center - curb, gutter, and sidewalk gap closure, bike lane

0.5 City of Elk Grove Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan $545,000 Higher Priority

30086 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Pedestrian Upgrade Elk Grove - city-wide

Walnut Ave - Grove St to Emerald Park Dr;Lark Ave - Kent St to Webb St;Polhemus Dr - 2nd Ave to Quaymas Ct;Porta Rosa Way - North of Elk Grove Blvd;Elk Grove Florin Rd - Aizenberg Cir to Bond Rd

Varies $353,800 Medium Priority

30098 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Pedestrian Upgrade Elk Grove Blvd.Elk Grove Florin Rd to Walnut Ave;School St. to Waterman Rd.

0.2 $800,000 Medium Priority

30088 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Planning City of Elk Grove Pedestrian Master Plan N/A City of Elk Grove General Plan$50,000 - $150,000

Higher Priority

30089 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Planning City of Elk Grove Trails Master Plan N/A City of Elk Grove General Plan $50,000 - $150,000Higher Priority

31137 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Wayfinding Elk Grove - city-wide Bikeway Wayfinding Program; signing and striping N/A City of Elk Grove Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan$100,000 - $500,000

Higher Priority

!!!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

CALVINE RD

BOND RD

GRANT LINE RD

SHELDON RD

WATE

RMAN

RD

BRAD

SHAW

RD

DILLARD RD

ELK

GROV

E FL

ORIN

RDELK GROVE BLVD

BADE

R RD

EXCE

LSIO

R RD

WILTON RD

VINTAGE PARK DR

E STOCKTON BLVD

SALAS RD

RILE

Y RD

VINEY

ARD

RD

BROWN RD

CAYMUS DR

ESCHINGER RD

CORFU DR

DIER

KS R

D

MAINLINE D R

WALMORT RD

KAPALUA LNELK WAYRAN CHO D R

KENT

ST BOVILL DR

W STOCKTON BLVD

STON

EBRO

OK D

R

BRITTANY PARK DR

SHOR

T RD

POWER INN RD

DINO

DR

HALFWAY RD

HERITAGE HILL DR

WEBB

ST

COTT

ONW

OOD

LN

KINGS

BRID

GE D

R

PLEASANT GROVE SCHOOL RD

VALLEY OAK LN

MACK

EY R

D

S LEEP Y HOL LOW LNROBBINS RD

IRON ROCK WAY

ELKMONT WAY

FOUR SEAS ONS DR

LUCCHESI DR

W CAMDEN DR

MOSHER RD

BL ACK KIT E DR

SCHO

OL ST

LUJAN DR

BOTHWELL DR

E PARK DR

CRO W ELL DR

POLHEMUS DR

GRAYBILL LN

EMERALD PAR K DR

2ND

AVE

SHASTA L I LY DR

EQUINE DR

SHOR

TLIN

E LN

PARK MEADOWS DR

JORD

AN R

ANCH

RD

GARR

ITY D

R

LAGUNA SPRINGS DR

CLARKE FARMS DR

SALM

ON C

REEK

DRELK CREST DR

KAMMERER RD

QUAIL C OVE D R

W STOCKTON BLVD

E STOCKT ON BLVD

MACK EY RD

Elk Grove:East


! SchoolsCities


!!

!!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

FRAN

KLIN

BLVD

BRUC

EVILL

E RD

LAGUNA BLVD

ELK GROVE BLVD

BILBY RD

BIG HORN BLV D

SIMS RD

CALVINE RD

CENTER PKYSHELDON RD

WILLARD PKY

JACIN T O AVEBABSON DR

MATINA DR

AUBE

RRY D

RCARL

IN AV

E

LAGUN A PAR

K DR

TEGAN RD

W STOCKTON BLVD

MARITIME DR

HARBOUR POINT DR

COOP DR

POWER INN RD

LAK EPOINT DR WYMARK D R

FIRE P

OPPY

DR

BELLATERRA DR

GILL

IAM D

R

RIPARIAN DRW TARO N DR

E LAKE DR

E STOCKTON B LVD

MCLEAN DR

JACINTO RD

E TAR O N DR

STATHOS DR

LAGU

NA S

PRIN

GS D

R

KILCONNELL DR

VAUX AVE

W LAKE DR

FR ANKLIN HI GH RD

LEWI

S STE

I N R

D

DI LUSSO DR

SEASONS DR

DWIGHT RD

OLD CREEK DR

TOSC

ANO D

R

BLOSSOM RIDGE DR

RED ELK DRBO

A NOVA DR

GRANITE PA RK LN

GENERATIO NS DR

D EN ALI CIR

DUN ISCH RD

WATE

RFOWL D

R

BLOSSOM RANCH DR

BUNGALOW WAY

PERCHERON DR

CRESLEIGH PKY

LAKE TERRACE DRMALHEUR W

AY

VIL

LAGE TREE DR

SANT

ORIN

I DR

LAGUNA O AKS DR

SPRING FLOWER DR

FRYE CREEK DR

LAGU

NA ST

AR D

R

FLOX WAY

TERRAZZO DR

BARCELLA DR

SOLOMON DR

MONETTA DR

CROWN BENCH CIR

WOODED BROOK DR

AMBER CREEK D R

SHENANGO WAY

BILBY RD

W STOCKTON BLVD

SIMS R

D

CALVINE RD

DWIGHT RD

Elk Grove:West


! SchoolsCities





CITY OF FOLSOM

30102 Sacramento City of Folsom Multi‐use Path (Class I) Folsom Lake Class I Bikeway

East Natoma St. corridor from the Folsom Prison entrance road to the Folsom/El Dorado County Line. Includes a bike/pedestrian overcrossing at Folsom Lake Crossing Road

City of Folsom Bikeway Master Plan, Folsom Lake SRA General Plan, & Highway 50 Corridor Bicycle Pedestrian Transportation Plan


30103 Sacramento City of Folsom Multi‐use Path (Class I) Lake Natoma Trail Gap ClosureLake Natoma Bike Trail from the terminus of Class I trail behind Lake Natoma Inn to the Historic Truss Bridge



30104 Sacramento City of Folsom Multi‐use Path (Class I) Historic Powerhouse Canal TrailHistoric Truss Bridge to the Folsom Prison Entracne Road



30106 Sacramento City of Folsom Multi‐use Path (Class I) Folsom/Placerville Rail Trail

Bicycle/pedestrian trail along East Bidwell portion of Sacramento‐Placerville Transportation Corridor from the HBWC Trail to Hwy 50. Pedestrian and bicycle connections to Folsom Class I trails. Improved pedestrian crossings of East Bidwell adjacent to Folsom Lake College.

City of Folsom Bikeway Master Plan $1,800,000 Higher Priority

31202 Sacramento City of Folsom Multi‐use Path (Class I)Along the Humbug‐Willow Creek Trail Corridor

Humbug‐ Willow Creek Trail: Along HBWC trail corridor, completes the gap between Empire Ranch and the Parkway

City of Folsom Bikeway Master Plan $350,000 Higher Priority

30107 Sacramento City of Folsom Multi‐use Path (Class I) Mormon Island Wetlands TrailHumbug‐Willow Creek Trail, north‐east of Empire Ranch Rd., to Green Valley Rd., just west of the intersection with Sophia Pkwy.


$775,000 Medium Priority

31204 Sacramento City of Folsom Multi‐use Path (Class I) Folsom ‐ Parallel to Highway 50Willow Hills Reservoir Trail: Parallel to Highway 50 ‐ between Prarie City Road and East Bidwell Street with a connection to the El Dorado Trail

City of Folsom Bikeway Master Plan $2,500,000 Medium Priority

30108 Sacramento City of Folsom Bike Lanes (Class II) Folsom Blvd.. Hwy 50 to Natoma St. City of Folsom Bikeway Master Plan TBD Medium Priority

30109 Sacramento City of Folsom Combined Projects Iron Point Road.Class I & II along Iron Point Rd from Folsom Blvd to eastern Sacramento County line

TBD Medium Priority

30119 Sacramento City of Folsom Combined Projects Folsom/Placerville Rail Trail E. Bidwell St. to Glenn Dr. City of Folsom Bikeway Master Plan $395,000 Medium Priority

30113 Sacramento City of Folsom Intersections FolsomSignalized Street Intersection Improvements at various locations

City of Folsom Bikeway Master Plan $375,000 Higher Priority

30114 Sacramento City of Folsom Over/Undercrossing Folsom Blvd.. Overcrossing at Humbug‐Willow Creek City of Folsom Bikeway Master Plan $3,500,000 Higher Priority30115 Sacramento City of Folsom Over/Undercrossing US 50 Folsom Blvd. in the City of Folsom City of Folsom Bikeway Master Plan TBD Medium Priority

31143 Sacramento City of Folsom Overcrossing Humbug Creek Trail at Oak Avenue Parkway

Bike/pedestrian Overcrossing at Oak Avenue Parkway to provide a grade separated crossing for the Humbug Creek Trail

City of Folsom Bikeway Master Plan $2,500,000 Medium Priority

30118 Sacramento City of Folsom Traffic Calming Folsom School St‐Wales St.‐Dean St.‐Montrose Dr. Glenn Dr. Bicycle Boulevards: $350,000 Medium Priority

31203 Sacramento City of Folsom UndercrossingOak Parkway Trail the intersection of East Natoma Street

Bike/pedestrian Undercrossing at East Natoma Street to provide grade separated crossing for the Oak Parkway Trail.


Page 15 of 59

!! !

!!

!

!

!!

!

!!!!

!

!

!!

!! ! !

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

FOLSOM BLVDWHITE ROCK RD

I RON POINT RD

MAIN

AVE

OAK AVE

RILEY ST

E BIDWELL ST

BLUE

RAVIN

E R

D

E NATOMA STELM AVE

GREENBACK LN

MADISON AVE

CENTRAL AVE

PRAI

RIE C

ITY R

D

HAZE

L AVE

PERSHING AVE

ALMO

ND AV

E

FILBE

RT AV

E

LATROBE RD

WALN

UT AV

E

HICK

ORY A

VE

OAK AVENUE PKY

PECA

N AV

E

CHES

TNUT

AVE

GREEN VALLEY RD

SIBLEY ST

SE RRAN

O PKY

GLE NN DR

NATOMA ST

CAVIT T DR

SILVA VALLEY PKY

EL DORADO HILLS BLVD

EMPIRE RANCH RD

BROA

DSTO

NE PKY

BEATTY DR

FOLSOM AUBURN RD

POWERS DR

BEEC

H AV

E

GOLF LINKS D R

SERPA WAY

PARK DR

WALE

S DR

RIDGEVIEW DR

SOPHIA PKY

CREEKSIDE DR

SILBE

RHORN DR

LEVY RD

GOLD COUNTRY BLVD

BALD

WIN

DAM

RD

FOLSOM LAKE CROSSING

MCAD

OO DR

R US SI RD

FRANCISCO DR

BIDWELL ST

RANDAL L DR

APPI AN W

AY

MONTROSE DR

STANFORD LNLOCH WAY

MONT

E MA

R DR

SANT

A JUA

NITA

AVE

SOUZA DR

PARKWAY DR

TU RN PIK

E DR

FLOWER DR

S LEXINGTON DR

SUNCAST LN

PIAZZA PL

WILLARD DR

GOLDEN FO OTHILL PKY

POST STVINE ST

LEMBI DR

LEEDY LN

HALIDO N WAY

VALLEJO DR

BRITTANY WAY

SUFFOLK WAY

VILLAG

E GREEN DR

BIG

VALLEY RD

TONG RD

LA S ERENA DR

WINDING OAK DR

HIGHLAND HILLS DR

MUSE

DR

BRIGG S RANC H DR

PLATT CIR

SUR MER DR GREE

NVIEW DR

FAIRCHILD DR

HADD

INGT

ON D

R

GILLETT DR

PARKSHORE DR

ABERDEEN LN

VENE

ZIA D

R

SCHOONER

DR

LAKE N ATOMA DRGRESHAM DR

PALLADIO PKY

HILLSWOOD DR

VIA TREVISO

EDEN OAKS AVEINWOOD RDKNIGHT LN

H

ILLSDALE CIR

NAWAL DR

ANASTASIA WAY

UPLANDS DR

TREV

I WAY

PENDLETON DR

BRISBANE CIR

MONTROSE WAY

SCOTT RD

HILLVIEW DR

REDONDO DR

PENELA WAY

STEVEN AVE

PLAC

ER M

INE RD

WOODMERE RD

BLACK DIAMOND DR

ARROWHEAD DR

WOODSMOKE WAY

BOBB

Y ST

KILT CIR

DEAN W

AY

BEACON AVE

BAILEY CIR

OAK AVE

OAK AVENUE PKY

PARK DR

Folsom Proposed Multi-Use PathProposed Bike LaneProposed Bike Route

! SchoolsCities





CITY OF GALT31153 Sacramento City of Galt Multi‐use Path (Class I) Emerald Vista Park Bridge From Emerald Vista Park across Deadman Gulch 1500 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $240,000 Higher Priority

31183 Sacramento City of Galt Multi‐use Path (Class I) Dry Creek Trail From RR tracks west to future park site 3400 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $163,200 Lower Priority31184 Sacramento City of Galt Multi‐use Path (Class I) North Branch Deadman Gulch Marengo RD to Cherokee LN 5700 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $273,600 Lower Priority

31185 Sacramento City of Galt Multi‐use Path (Class I) North ‐South Leg Dry Creek Trail From South Branch Deadman Gulch to Boessow RD 5400 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $259,200 Lower Priority

31186 Sacramento City of Galt Multi‐use Path (Class I) South Branch Deadman Gulch Marengo RD to Cherokee LN 5700 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $273,600 Lower Priority31195 Sacramento City of Galt Multi‐use Path (Class I) Dry Creek Trail From Marengo Rd to Hwy. 99 5900 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $283,200 Medium Priority31196 Sacramento City of Galt Multi‐use Path (Class I) Dry Creek Trail From Hwy. 99 to Chase DR 2200 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $105,600 Medium Priority31197 Sacramento City of Galt Multi‐use Path (Class I) North Branch Deadman Gulch Emerald Vista DR to Vintage Oak AVE 800 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $38,400 Medium Priority31198 Sacramento City of Galt Multi‐use Path (Class I) South Branch Deadman Gulch Trafalgar CIR to Cedar Flat RD 1500 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $72,000 Medium Priority

30125 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Lanes (Class II) CBD Bike Improvements C Street from 6th ST to Civic Dr 4800SACOG Community Design Grant‐ "C" ST/Central Galt Complete Streets ProjectGalt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011

$64,800 Higher Priority

30126 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Lanes (Class II) West A. Street RR tracks and west to City limits 4,512 LF Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $60,912 Higher Priority

30128 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Lanes (Class II) Elm Avenue South side (city) between Ashley WY to Robin LN 1585 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $21,400 Higher Priority

30129 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Lanes (Class II) A Street From Lincoln WY to Galt HS driveway 706 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $9,600 Higher Priority30132 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Lanes (Class II) New Hope Road 1st ST west to City Limits 2900 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $102,700 Higher Priority30139 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Lanes (Class II) Marengo Elk Hills DR south to RR tracks 1400 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $76,500 Higher Priority31144 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Lanes (Class II) Bay Shore Dr Lake Canyon AVE to Elk Hills DR 1500 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $20,250 Higher Priority

31207 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Lanes (Class II) Marengo RDWest side, South of Lake Park Ave south to Walnut AVE

1500 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $53,100 Higher Priority

30127 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Lanes (Class II) Amador Avenue Carol DR to west end of existing Amador Ave. 1062 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $14,337 Lower Priority30131 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Lanes (Class II) Twin Cities Road South side, Marengo RD to Cherokee LN 5300 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $187,700 Lower Priority30133 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Lanes (Class II) Simmerhorn Road Hwy 99 east to City Limits 1400 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $76,500 Lower Priority30134 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Lanes (Class II) Kost Road Joy RD west to City Limits 3820 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $135,300 Lower Priority30135 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Lanes (Class II) Twin Cities Road W. Stockton BLVD west to Sargent AVE 7000 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $382,200 Lower Priority30138 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Lanes (Class II) Boessow Road Marengo RD to Dry Creek Class I Trail 1400 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $76,500 Lower Priority30141 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Lanes (Class II) Future Streets 35200 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 TBD Lower Priority30142 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Lanes (Class II) Sargent Road Twin Cities RD to Kost RD 18700 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $1,021,100 Lower Priority30144 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Lanes (Class II) Cherokee Lane Twin Cities RD to Marengo RD 13400 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $731,700 Lower Priority30145 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Lanes (Class II) Crystal Way A ST north to Simmerhorn RD 2000 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 TBD Lower Priority31154 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Lanes (Class II) Boessow Road Dry Creek Trail to Cherokee LN 4000 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $218,400 Lower Priority31155 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Lanes (Class II) Carillion Blvd. Simmerhorn RD south to Crystal WY 5000 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 TBD Lower Priority31156 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Lanes (Class II) Crystal Way Off‐ramp south to Dry Creek Trail 900 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $12,150 Lower Priority31157 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Lanes (Class II) Kost RD City Limits west to Sargent AVE 3800 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $207,500 Lower Priority31158 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Lanes (Class II) Marengo RD City Limits south to Boessow RD 4500 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $245,700 Lower Priority31159 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Lanes (Class II) Marengo RD From CGIC east to Marengo RD 2600 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 TBD Lower Priority31160 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Lanes (Class II) McKenzie RD Twin Cities Rd north to Mingo RD 4400 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $240,300 Lower Priority31161 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Lanes (Class II) New Hope RD City Limits west to Sargent AVE 2200 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $120,200 Lower Priority31162 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Lanes (Class II) Simmerhorn RD Carillion BLVD to Cherokee LN 6700 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $365,900 Lower Priority

31163 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Lanes (Class II) Twin Cities Road North side, W. Stockton Blvd west to Sargent Ave 7000 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $382,200 Lower Priority

31164 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Lanes (Class II) Twin Cities Road North side, Hwy.99 to Cherokee LN 13600 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $481,500 Lower Priority31165 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Lanes (Class II) W. A ST/Harvey RD City Limits west to Sargent AVE 1300 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $71,000 Lower Priority31166 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Lanes (Class II) W. Elm AVE/Orr RD North Side, City Limits west to Sargent AVE 900 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $31,900 Lower Priority30136 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Lanes (Class II) W. Stockton Blvd.. Twin Cties RD to Live Oak AVE 6800 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $371,300 Medium Priority30137 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Lanes (Class II) Boessow Road Crystal Wy to Marengo RD 2400 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $131,100 Medium Priority30140 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Lanes (Class II) Carillion Blvd. City Limits south to Simmerhorn RD 1700 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $92,900 Medium Priority30143 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Lanes (Class II) Simmerhorn Road City Limits east to Carillion BLVD 2600 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $142,000 Medium Priority31187 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Lanes (Class II) W. Elm AVE North Side, City Limits east to RR tracks 2200 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $77,900 Medium Priority31145 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Route (Class III) Elk Hills DR Carillion BLVD to Walnut AVE 2200 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $29,700 Higher Priority31146 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Route (Class III) Elk Hills DR Walnut AVE to Marengo RD 2100 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $28,400 Higher Priority31147 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Route (Class III) Elk Hills DR Walnut AVE to Marengo RD 2100 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $28,400 Higher Priority31148 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Route (Class III) Lake Canyon Ave Fermoy WY to Carillion BLVD 2800 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $37,800 Higher Priority31149 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Route (Class III) Lake Park Ave Carillion BLVD to Marengo RD 4400 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $59,400 Higher Priority31150 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Route (Class III) Park Terrace DR Twin Cities RD to Walnut AVE 3500 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $47,300 Higher Priority31151 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Route (Class III) Vintage Oak AVE Walnut AVE to Cedar Flat AVE 3800 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $51,300 Higher Priority31152 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Route (Class III) Vintage Oak AVE Cedar Flat AVE to Carillion BLVD 900 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $12,200 Higher Priority31167 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Route (Class III) 1st St New Hope RD to Kost RD 2600 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $35,100 Lower Priority31168 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Route (Class III) Amador Avenue Industrial DR to Carol DR 2300 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $31,100 Lower Priority31169 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Route (Class III) Cedar Flat AVE Vintage Oak AVE to Deadman Gulch 1200 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $16,200 Lower Priority31170 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Route (Class III) Cedar Flat AVE Deadman Gulch to Anmador AVE 1000 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 TBD Lower Priority31171 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Route (Class III) Elm Avenue Industrial DR to Lincoln WY 1700 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $23,000 Lower Priority31172 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Route (Class III) Industrial Dr Elm AVE to Pringle RD 2300 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $31,100 Lower Priority31173 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Route (Class III) Industrial Dr Live Oak Ave to Walnut AVE 2600 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 TBD Lower Priority31174 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Route (Class III) Live Oak Ave North Side from Industrial DR to Lincoln WY 960 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $34,000 Lower Priority

31175 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Route (Class III) Live Oak AveSouth Side from Consoldated Fabricators to Lincoln WY

560 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $19,900 Lower Priority

31176 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Route (Class III) McFarland ST W. Elm AVE to W. A ST 2760 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $97,800 Lower Priority31177 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Route (Class III) Oak AVE Elm AVE to A ST 2640 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $35,700 Lower Priority31178 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Route (Class III) Vintage Oak AVE Carillion BLVD to Killebrew WY 600 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $8,100 Lower Priority31179 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Route (Class III) Vintage Oak AVE Killebrew Wy to Marengo RD 3200 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 TBD Lower Priority31180 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Route (Class III) W C ST Fumasi DR to west city limits 800 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $10,800 Lower Priority

Page 16 of 59




31181 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Route (Class III) W C ST West city limits to Sargent AVE 1300 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 TBD Lower Priority31182 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Route (Class III) Walnut Avenue Future Industrial Dr to W. Stockton Blvd 600 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $32,800 Lower Priority31188 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Route (Class III) Adare Wy Emerald Vista DR to Fermoy WY 800 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $10,800 Medium Priority31189 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Route (Class III) Emerald Vista DR Walnut AVE to Adare WY 1500 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $20,300 Medium Priority31190 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Route (Class III) Emerald Oak DR W. Elm AVE to W. A ST 2660 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $36,000 Medium Priority31191 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Route (Class III) Fumasi DR W. A ST to W. C ST 1200 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $16,200 Medium Priority31192 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Route (Class III) Industrial Dr Pringle RD to Live Oak Ave 2500 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $33,800 Medium Priority31193 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Route (Class III) Sparrow DR W. Elm AVE to W. A ST 2660 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $36,000 Medium Priority31194 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Route (Class III) W C ST Fourth ST to Fumasi DR 3900 Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $52,700 Medium Priority

31305 Sacramento City of Galt Bike Route (Class III) CBD Bike ImprovementsC Street west of 4th ST to 6th ST, 4th ST between A Street and F Street, South Lincoln Way between A Street and F Street

4800 LF Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan ‐ 2011 $64,800 Medium Priority

Page 17 of 59

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

KOST RD

TWIN CITIES RD

C ST

A ST

ORR RD

MARE

NGO

RD

CHRI

STEN

SEN

RD E STOCKTON BLVD

CARILLION BLVD

F ST

SIMMERHORN RD

BOESSOW RD

ELK HILLS DR

ELM AVE

1ST S

T

4TH ST

HARVEY RD

S LINCOLN WAY

W C ST

3RD ST

JOY DRN LINCOLN W

A Y

W STOCKTON BLVD

W A ST

MIDW

AY AV

E

MCKE

NZIE

RD

W E ST

AMADOR AVE

PALIN

AVE

OAK A

VE

LAKE PARK AVE

G ST

W ELM AVE

HAUS

CHILD

T RD

LAKE C ANYON AVE

WALNUT AVE

E ST

CRYSTAL WAY

FERM

OY W

AY

PARK TERRACE DR

EMER

ALD

VIST

A DR

VINT AGE OAK AVE

RANCH RD

M E LADEE LN

EMER

ALD

OAK

DR

IN DUSTRIAL DR

CORNELL RD

BERG

ERON

RD

ADARE WAY

CAROLINE AVEFUMA

SI D

R

ROSSI DR

OBERLINE WAY

PINTO

TRAIL

DR

CHRISTYLYN WAY

MYRTLE AVE

UNNA

MED

RD

MARIA WAY

RACHEL DR

SPRU

CE AV

E

GUILD ST

ENTERPRISE CT

CH RISTEN SEN R DE ST

UNNA

MED

RD

1ST S

T

WALNUT AVE

UNNA

MED

RD

UNNA

MED

RD

Galt Proposed Multi-Use PathProposed Bike LaneProposed Bike Route

! SchoolsCities


Proposed Bike/Ped Bridge

Existing Bike/Ped Bridge


Page 18 of 59



CITY OF ISLETON31205 Sacramento City of Isleton Multi-use Path (Class I) Delta Trail

Along the Sacramento River waterfront and Hwy. 160

TBD

30147 Sacramento City of Isleton Planning City of Isleton Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan & Feasibility Study TBD

!

160

F STA ST

C ST

1ST ST

G ST

E ST

160

Isleton Proposed Multi-Use PathProposed Bike LaneProposed Bike Route

! SchoolsCities



Page 19 of 59



CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA30151 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Multi-use Path (Class I) Hagan Park Bike Path Trail Connection

Hagan Park Bike Path Trail to American River Parkway

City of Rancho Cordova Bicycle Master Plan $165,000 Higher Priority

30156 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Multi-use Path (Class I) Citrus Road Trail Folsom Boulevard City of Rancho Cordova Bicycle Master Plan $2,000,000 Higher Priority30157 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Multi-use Path (Class I) N Mather Blvd.. Connection to Mather Blvd. City of Rancho Cordova Bicycle Master Plan $422,000 Higher Priority30166 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Multi-use Path (Class I) Mather Field Road. UP Rail Spur City of Rancho Cordova Bicycle Master Plan $1,810,000 Higher Priority

30167 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Multi-use Path (Class I) Mather Field Road. (UP Rail Spur)Feasibility Study of Pedestrian, ADA and Safety Improvements

City of Rancho Cordova Bicycle Master Plan $150,000 Higher Priority

30150 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Multi-use Path (Class I) Kiefer Blvd.. Connection Kiefer Blvd. to Folsom South Canal City of Rancho Cordova Bicycle Master Plan $230,000 Lower Priority30153 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Multi-use Path (Class I) Stone Creek Trail SE Connection Stone Creek Trail to Folsom South Canal City of Rancho Cordova Bicycle Master Plan $35,000 Lower Priority

30154 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Multi-use Path (Class I) Stone Creek Trail SW Connection Stone Creek Trail to Mather Blvd. Existing Trail City of Rancho Cordova Bicycle Master Plan $16,000 Lower Priority

30155 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Multi-use Path (Class I) Stone Creek Trail NW Connection Stone Creek Trail to International Drive City of Rancho Cordova Bicycle Master Plan $18,000 Lower Priority30158 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Multi-use Path (Class I) Connection to International Drive Capital Center Dr. City of Rancho Cordova Bicycle Master Plan $200,000 Lower Priority30159 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Multi-use Path (Class I) Rio del Oro Trail Sunrise Boulevard City of Rancho Cordova Bicycle Master Plan $200,000 Lower Priority30160 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Multi-use Path (Class I) Anatolia Bike Trail Rancho Cordova Parkway City of Rancho Cordova Bicycle Master Plan $2,500,000 Lower Priority

30164 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Multi-use Path (Class I) Stone Creek Trail N Pedestrian Signal for Stone Creek Trail N Connection at Zinfandel Dr.

City of Rancho Cordova Bicycle Master Plan $200,000 Lower Priority

30165 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Multi-use Path (Class I) Stone Creek Trail N Ramp and Crosswalk for Stone Creek N Connection at Prospect Park Dr.


30168 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Multi-use Path (Class I) Stone Creek Trail N Connection at Kilgore Rd. City of Rancho Cordova Bicycle Master Plan $14,000 Lower Priority31201 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Multi-use Path (Class I) Stone Creek Trail NE Connection Stone Creek Trail to Folsom South Canal City of Rancho Cordova Bicycle Master Plan $30,000 Lower Priority30161 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Multi-use Path (Class I) Primary Route Trail Signage on Existing Routes City of Rancho Cordova Bicycle Master Plan $9,000 Medium Priority30162 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Bike Lanes (Class II) Citywide Class II Striping City of Rancho Cordova Bicycle Master Plan 810,000* Higher Priority31199 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Bike Route (Class III) Citywide Class III Striping City of Rancho Cordova Bicycle Master Plan $18,240 Higher Priority30172 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Intersections City of Rancho Cordova Intersection Improvements City of Rancho Cordova Pedestrian Master Plan $2,840,000 Higher Priority31200 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Intersections Citywide Bike detection at intersections City of Rancho Cordova Bicycle Master Plan $500,000 Higher Priority

30169 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Intersections Stone Creek Trail N Ramp and Crosswalk for Stone Creek N Connection at Kilgore Rd.


30176 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Intersections City of Rancho CordovaMidblock Signalized Crossing on Folsom Blvd. at the Cordova Town Center Light Rail Station

City of Rancho Cordova Pedestrian Master Plan $300,000 Medium Priority

30163 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Over/Undercrossing Promenade at High Priorityway 50 East of Zinfandel Interchange City of Rancho Cordova Bicycle Master Plan $8,500,000 Medium Priority

30170 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Pedestrian Upgrade City of Rancho Cordova Sidewalk Infill Opportunities City of Rancho Cordova Pedestrian Master Plan $7,300,000 Higher Priority30171 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Pedestrian Upgrade City of Rancho Cordova Sidewalk Repair City of Rancho Cordova Pedestrian Master Plan $1,100,000 Higher Priority30173 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Pedestrian Upgrade City of Rancho Cordova Pedestrian Pathway Upgrades City of Rancho Cordova Pedestrian Master Plan $180,000 Lower Priority30175 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Pedestrian Upgrade City of Rancho Cordova Lighting Improvements City of Rancho Cordova Pedestrian Master Plan $60,000 Lower Priority30174 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Pedestrian Upgrade City of Rancho Cordova Midblock Crossings City of Rancho Cordova Pedestrian Master Plan $500,000 Medium Priority

!

!! ! !

! !

!!

!

!!!

!

!!

!!!!

!

!

!!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

FOLSOM BLVD

SUNRISE BLVD

WHITE ROCK RD

COLOMA RD

DOUGLAS RD

ZINFANDEL DR

WALNUT AVE

FAIR

OAK

S BL

VD

GARF

IELD

AVE

DATA

DR

GUNN

RD

KILGORE RD

GOLD COU N TRY BLVD

ROUT

IER

RD

BRAD

SHAW

RD

LUYUNG DRINTERNATIONAL DR

OLD PLACERVILLE RD

ENGLE RD

AMBA

SSADOR DR

MCGREGOR DR

RECYCLE RD

NORTH AVE

ARAMO

N DR

GOETHE RD

KENNETH AVE

HORN RD

TRADE CENTER DR

OLSO N DRFITZGERALD RD

EL CAMINO AVE

MERC

ANTIL

E DR

ARDEN WAY

CHASE DR

WHITNEY AVE

HAZEL AVE

ROD BEAUDRY DR

ROCKINGHAM DR

BE NITA DR

BAROQUE DR

LIN COLN VILL AGE DR

MILLS STA TION RD

OAK AVE

SPOT

O DR

SUN C ENTER DR

T ARSHES DR

QUALITY DR

GOLD RUSH DR

EXPLORER DR

VIKI

NG D

R

MILLS TOWER DR

HAPPY LN

GOLD CENTER DR

SECU

RITY

PARK

DR

AMALGAM WAY

CORDOVA LN

BUSINES S PARK DR

SYS TEMS PKY

ELKS CIR

VEH ICLE DR

CITRU

S RD

SUNRISE PAR K D R

MONIER CIR

DON JUAN DR

CROYDON WAY

GOLD STRIKE DR

AIRPARK DR

TOWER PARK DR

GREE

N PA

RK LN

CORDOVA LN

KENNETH AVE

Rancho Cordova:North

Alignments east of Sunrise are proposed and subject to change; all new roads will include Class II/III facilities.


! SchoolsCities


!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

! !

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

SUNR

ISE B

LVD

GRANT LINE RD

WHITE ROCK RD

BRAD

SHAW

RD

DOUGLAS RD

KIEFER BLVD

EXCE

LSIO

R RD

FOLSOM BLVD

ZINFANDEL DR

JACKSON RD

DATA

DR

ELDER CREEK RD

HAPPY LN

ROUT

IER

RD

LUYUNG DR

INTERNATIONAL DR

OLD PLACERVILLE RD

RECYCLE RD

KILGORE RD

H ORN RD

FITZGERALD RD

OLSON DR

CHRYSANTHY BLVD

ROD BEAUDRY DR

ROCKIN GHAM DR

BAROQUE DR

LINC OLN VILLAGE DR

GOETHE RD

SPOT

O DR

COLOMA RD

QUALITY DR

BEAR

HOLLO

W DR

EXPLORER DR

GOLD CENTER DR

SECU

RITY

PARK

DR

SYS TEMS PKY

MONIER CIR

AIRPARK DR

KIEFER BLVD

KIEFER BLVD

WHITE ROCK RD

Rancho Cordova:South

Alignments east of Sunrise are proposed and subject to change; all new roads will include Class II/III facilities.


! SchoolsCities





CITY OF SACRAMENTO30230 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I) Haggin Oaks Golf Course Bike trail from Fulton Ave to Longview Dr. 0.81 TBD Higher Priority

30222 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I) South Sacramento Parkway (west)Bike trail along the South City Limits from the Bill Conlin Park to Meadowview Park. Distance of 0.52 miles.

0.52 TBD Higher Priority

30224 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I) Two Rivers Bike Trail Ph 2 East Bike trail along the south levee of the American River 0.9 TBD Higher Priority30232 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I) Union House Creek Trail Bike trail along Union House Creek north of Cosumnes River Boulevard from Deer lake Drive to Bruceville Road. TBD Higher Priority30273 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I) 4th Ave. Bike Trail East‐West bike trail extending from 4th Ave from Red 0.53 TBD Lower Priority

30268 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I) Arena Access TrailEast‐west bike trail between East Commerce Way to Del Paso Rd overpass.

0.68 TBD Lower Priority

30270 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I) C‐1 CanalBike trail along the C‐1 canal from the Natomas East Main Drain Canal to the East Drainage Canal.


30275 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I) Cal Central Traction RR TrailBike trail along the Cal Central Traction RR Right of Way from Power Inn Rd. to the City limits.


30269 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I) Elvas Bike TrailBike trail on the northeast side of the Elvas Ave. from 36th Way to F St.


30259 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I) Folsom LRT Trail WestBike trail along the Folsom Light Rail Line between Alhambra Blvd. and 65th St.


31116 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I) Freeport/4th Ave TrailWidened sidewalk connecting westbound 4th Ave/Freeport Blvd to the crosswalk at westbound 4th Ave/Freeport Blvd

TBD Lower Priority

31117 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I) H Street Bike Trail:Bike trail along H Street between Camellia Avenue and Carlson Drive.


30264 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I) I‐5 Bike Trail SystemBike trails along both sides of Interstate 5 from Hwy 99 interchange to the San Juan Road.


30267 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I) I‐5 South Natomas Bike TrailNorth‐south bike trail along east edge of I‐5 from San Juan Rd to West El Camino Ave.


30258 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I) Laguna TowerBike trail along the Laguna Creek tower easement from Laguna Creek to the south City limits.


30265 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I) Morrison CreekBike trail along Morrison Creek from Mack Rd. to 53rd Ave.


30262 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I) Ninos Bike Trail ExtensionBike trail connecting the Ninos Bike Trail at the northern limits to the Ninos Parkway Bridge.


30276 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I) Ramona Ave. Bike TrailNorth‐South bike trail extending from Ramona Ave to 14th Ave.


30257 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I) Riverfront Master Plan TrailsBike trail system upgrades and enhancements between R St and I St along the Sacramento River.


30274 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I) Roanoke Ave Access Trail Bike trail from Roanoke Avenue to Winters Street. 200 ft TBD Lower Priority

30261 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I)Sacramento River Parkway (Little Pocket)

Bike trail on the Sacramento River levee from Captain's Table to trailhead at 35th Avenue.


30272 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I)Sacramento River Parkway (Middle Pocket)

Bike trail on the Sacramento River levee from the Garcia Bend Park to Arabella Way.


30266 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I) San Juan Access Trail Bike trail on the north and south sides of San Juan Rd 0.57 TBD Lower Priority

30255 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I)Ueda Park Bike Trail Connection at El Camino Ave Bridge

Pave the undercrossing at the new West El Camino bridge where it crosses the Steelhead Creek drainage canal (west side of canal).


30271 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I) West Canal WestBike trail on the west side of the West Canal within the city limits.


30253 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I) Whitter Ranch Bike TrailNorth‐south bike trail along east edge of Whitter Ranch from Natomas Crossing to San Juan Road.


30246 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I) Airport Rd. TrailBike trail along the current alignment of Aiport Rd. between San Juan Rd. and Arena Blvd.

1.24 TBD Medium Priority

30233 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I) Arcade Creek Bike Trail (Ueda Parkway)Bike trail along Arcade Creek from Steelhead Creek to 1.8 TBD Medium Priority

30234 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I) Arcade Creek EastBike trail along Arcade Creek from Haginwood Park Through Del Paso Park to Auburn Blvd.


30245 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I) Center Parkway ExtensionBike trail on the west side of Center Parkway from Jacinto Park to Sheldon Rd.


30227 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I) Del Rio Bike TrailBike trail along the SPRR right‐of‐way from I‐5 Overcrossing to the Freeport Reservoir.


30229 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I) East Drainage CanalBike trail on the east sides of the East Drain Canal from the C1 Canal to Truxel Rd.


30235 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I) Folsom LRT Trail EastBike trail along the Folsom Light Rail Line between 65th St. and Watt Ave.


Page 20 of 59




30244 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I) Freeport South Bike Trail Bike trail parallel to Freeport Blvd on the east side from the Antioch Church driveway to the Water Treatment Plant driveway.


30250 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I) Haggin Oaks Golf Course West Bike trail from Connie Dr. to Arcade Creek. 0.81 TBD Medium Priority

30242 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I) Jefferson Lofts Bike TrailBike trail near Jefferson Lofts from Redding Avenue to connect to the future 4th Avenue Extension at the Railroad.


30241 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I) Laguna Creek South TrailBike trail along the south side of Laguna Creek from the existing bridge westward to the City limits.


30251 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I) Lanatt Way Access Trail Bike trail from Lanatt Way to Sutter's Landing Park. 0.4 TBD Medium Priority

30247 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I) Mangan ParkBike trail south of Mangan Park in Executive Airport right‐of‐way from 24th St to Freeport Blvd.


31118 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I) Morrison Creek SouthBike trail along the west side of Morrison Creek from Mack road to the new Cosumnes River Boulevard Extension.


30236 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I) Natomas Marketplace Bike TrailBike trail along north side of drainage canal along I‐80 from Gateway Park Dr to San Juan Road.


30223 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I) Ninos Parkway Bike Trail Bike trail in Ninos Parkway from San Juan Road to B D 1.1 TBD Medium Priority

30239 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I)North Natomas Regional Park Bike Trails

Network of bike trails within the North Natomas Regional Park.


30249 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I) Pocket Canal Phase VBike trail on the west and south sides of the Pocket Canal from Gloria Dr. to Havenside Dr.


30243 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I) Reichmuth Park to Del RioTrailBicycle trail following the wooded drainage way from Reichmuth Park to Proposed Del Rio Trail.


30252 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I) Robla Creek Bike Trail (Ueda Parkway)Bike trail along Robla Creek from Main Avenue to Sacramento Northern Bike Trial.


30248 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I) Sacramento River Bike Trail (Miller ParkBike trail along the Sacramento River from Broadway 0.2 TBD Medium Priority

30260 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I)Sacramento River Parkway (Upper Pocket)

Bike trail on the Sacramento River levee from Clipper Way to Arabella Way.

2 TBD Medium Priority

30256 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I) Shady Arbor TrailBike trail though Shady Arbor Neighborhood Park between Shady Arbor Court and Barandas Dr.


30226 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I) South Sacramento Parkway (east)Bike trail along the South City Limits from the Meadowview Park to Franklin Blvd. and along the west side of Franklin Blvd. south to Calvine Rd.


30263 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I) SP Railyards Bike trail through the SP railyards from E St. to the Sacramento River Bike Trail.


30231 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I)Steelhead Creek Bike Trail (Ueda Parkway)

Bike trail along Steelhead Creek from Arcade Creek to Main Avenue.


30225 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I)Two Rivers Bike Trail Ph 2 (formerly Sutter's Landing East)

Bike trail from Sutter's landing bridge along the American River to H St.


30240 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I)U.P. Tracks (old SP east/west mainline)

CSUS to Power Inn Road. 5.8 TBD Medium Priority

30254 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I)U.P. Tracks (old SP east/west mainline)

Sacramento to Roseville. 2.5 TBD Medium Priority

30228 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I)Ueda Park Bike Trail Connection to Sacramento Northern Trail

Trail along the east side of Steelhead Creek from El Camino Avenue to Sacramento Northern Trail.


30237 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I) UPRR Phase I Bike trail through the UPRR yards from Sacramento City College to Vallejo Way and SCC to 10th Ave.


30238 Sacramento City of Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I) UPRR Phase IIBike trail along the UPRR right‐of‐way from Sacramento City College to Morrision Creek.


30212 Sacramento City of Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) 24th Street North 24th Street between 2nd Avenue and Broadway TBD Higher Priority

30181 Sacramento City of Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) 65th Street 65th St. between 4th Ave and 14th Ave TBD Higher Priority30188 Sacramento City of Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) 8th Avenue/San Joaquin 8th Ave and San Joaquin St between Stockton Blvd and Southern Pacific RR tracks TBD Higher Priority

30186 Sacramento City of Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) Amherst St/60th Avenue/20th StConnection from Florin Rd to Chorley Park to complete the link from the northeastern corner of Morse School/Chorley Park

TBD Higher Priority

30187 Sacramento City of Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) Bannon Creek DriveBannon Creek Dr between Azevedo Dr and Truxel Rd

TBD Higher Priority

30199 Sacramento City of Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) Bell Avenue West Bell Av. between Taylor St and Bollanbacher Ave TBD Higher Priority

30192 Sacramento City of Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) Bruceville Road.Bruceville Rd between Valley Hi Dr and Wyndham Dr

TBD Higher Priority

30198 Sacramento City of Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) Capitol Mall Capitol Mall between Front St and 10th St TBD Higher Priority

30180 Sacramento City of Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) Franklin Blvd. Franklin Blvd between 2nd Ave and Fruitridge Rd TBD Higher Priority

30182 Sacramento City of Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) Freeport Blvd. Freeport Blvd between 4th Ave and 14th Ave TBD Higher Priority

Page 21 of 59




30178 Sacramento City of Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) Freeport Blvd. SouthFreeport Blvd between Meadowview Rd and City Limits

TBD Higher Priority

30195 Sacramento City of Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) McKinley Blvd. McKinley Blvd between 33rd St and Elvas Ave TBD Higher Priority

30183 Sacramento City of Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III)Middlecoff Way/Pendleton St/53rd Avenue

Connection from Mogan Dr to 24th St to complete the link from the northeastern corner of Chorley Park through the old Course Terrace neighborhood to Harkness School and Woodbine Park on 24th Street.

TBD Higher Priority

30179 Sacramento City of Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) Roseville Road Roseville Rd between Auburn Blvd. and City Limits TBD Higher Priority

30184 Sacramento City of Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) Seamas Avenue Seamas Ave between Peidmont and S Land Park Dr TBD Higher Priority

30185 Sacramento City of Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) Sutterville/12th Avenue Sutterville Rd. between Freeport and Franklin Blvd TBD Higher Priority

30197 Sacramento City of Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) V Street V St. between 8th St. and 24th St TBD Higher Priority

30207 Sacramento City of Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) Golden Oak/Alma VistaGolden Oak Ave between S. Land Park Dr and Pocket Rd

TBD Higher Priority

30210 Sacramento City of Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) BroadwayBike lanes or "sharrow" designations on Broadway between 19th and 21st Streets

TBD Lower Priority

30221 Sacramento City of Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) Canterbury RoadCanterbury Road between Slobe Avenue and Frontage Road

Lower Priority

31112 Sacramento City of Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) Frutiridge Road EastFruitridge Rd from South Land Park Dr. to Light Rail Station

Lower Priority

30213 Sacramento City of Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) Grand Avenue Grand Ave between Marysville Blvd and Winters St TBD Lower Priority

30214 Sacramento City of Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) Havenside DriveHavenside Dr. between Riverside Blvd. and Florin Rd.

TBD Lower Priority

30209 Sacramento City of Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) Oak Harbor DriveOak Harbor Dr between River Plaza Dr and Gateway Oaks Dr

TBD Lower Priority

30219 Sacramento City of Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) Pocket RoadPocket Rd between Park Riviera Wy and Riverside Blvd

TBD Lower Priority

30191 Sacramento City of Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) Redding Avenue Redding Ave between 14th Ave and San Joaquin St TBD Lower Priority

31113 Sacramento City of Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) San Juan Rd EastSan Juan Road between Fong Ranch Road and Tumbleweed Way

Lower Priority

30211 Sacramento City of Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) Shady Arbor DriveShady Arbor Dr. between West River Dr. and dead end

TBD Lower Priority

31114 Sacramento City of Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) Silver Eagle Rd/ San Juan RoadSilver Eagle Rd/San Juan Rd from Northgate Blvd to Norwood Ave

Lower Priority

30208 Sacramento City of Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) 35th Avenue 35th Avenue between Park Village St and Freeport Blvd TBD Lower Priority30220 Sacramento City of Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) Truxel Road at Del Paso Road Intersection Improvements for Bicycles TBD Lower Priority

30201 Sacramento City of Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) Venture Oaks WayVenture Oaks Wy between Gateway Oaks Dr. and Gateway Oaks Dr

TBD Lower Priority

30217 Sacramento City of Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) West El Camino AvenueW. El Camino Avenue between Gateway Oaks and I‐5

TBD Lower Priority

30196 Sacramento City of Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) 24th Street South24th St between 22nd Avenue and Sutterville Bypass

TBD Medium Priority

30204 Sacramento City of Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) 33rd Street 33rd St between Broadway and 12th Ave TBD Medium Priority

30177 Sacramento City of Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) Bell Avenue East Bell Ave. between Rio Linda Blvd. and Raley Blvd TBD Medium Priority

30189 Sacramento City of Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) Brookfield DriveBrookfield Dr between Franklin Blvd and Titan Parkway

TBD Medium Priority

31111 Sacramento City of Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) Carlson Drive Carlson Drive between J St and H St Medium Priority

30216 Sacramento City of Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) Cucamonga AvenueCucamonga Ave between Ramona Ave and Power Inn Rd

TBD Medium Priority

30215 Sacramento City of Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) Del Paso Blvd. Del Paso Blvd between Eleanor Ave and Arcade Blvd TBD Medium Priority

30193 Sacramento City of Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) Del Paso Blvd. East Del Paso Blvd between Arcade Blvd and Dayton St TBD Medium Priority

30205 Sacramento City of Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) H Street West H Street between Alhambra Blvd. and 33rd St TBD Medium Priority

30200 Sacramento City of Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) Havenhurst/56th AvenueHavenhurst Dr. between Greenhaven Dr. and Greenhaven Dr.; 56th Avenue between Havenhurst Dr. and S. Land Park Dr

TBD Medium Priority

30206 Sacramento City of Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) Los Robles Blvd.Los Robles Boulevard between Marysville Boulevard and DelPaso Boulevard

TBD Medium Priority

30202 Sacramento City of Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) Main Avenue Main Ave. between Pell Dr. and Rio Linda Blvd TBD Medium Priority

30194 Sacramento City of Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) Norwood Avenue Norwood Ave. between Main Ave and Grace Ave TBD Medium Priority

30190 Sacramento City of Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) Pebblewood Drive Pebblewood Dr between Azevedo Dr and Truxel Rd TBD Medium Priority

30203 Sacramento City of Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) Pocket/Meadowview RoadPocket/Meadowview Rd between Greenhaven Dr and Freeport Blvd

TBD Medium Priority

30218 Sacramento City of Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) Ramona AvenueNorth‐South segment on Ramona between LRT tracks and

TBD Medium Priority

31115 Sacramento City of Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) Stockton Blvd Stockton Blvd between T St and Broadway Medium Priority

Page 22 of 59




31311 Sacramento City of Sacramento Over/Undercrossing Southern Pacific Railyards UnderpassProvides Bike/Ped. expansion under Railroad mainline at SP Railyards site.

TBD Higher Priority

31307 Sacramento City of Sacramento Over/Undercrossing UPRY Bridge at SCC LRT StationProvides a Bike/Ped bridge over UP Railroad at Sacramento City College LRT Station

TBD Higher Priority

30312 Sacramento City of Sacramento Over/Undercrossing Arena Blvd. At East DrainProvides Bike/Ped. Connection over Arena Boulevard at the East Drain Canal in North Natomas.

TBD Lower Priority

31120 Sacramento City of Sacramento Over/Undercrossing Aspen UndercrossingProvides Bike/Ped. undercrossing at Watt Avenue south of Jackson Road,

TBD Lower Priority

30282 Sacramento City of Sacramento Over/Undercrossing B‐Drain, south of Rosin Blvd Provides Bike/Ped. over B Drain connecting bike trail near future Rosin Blvd to neighborhood south of drain. TBD Lower Priority

30306 Sacramento City of Sacramento Over/UndercrossingCalifornia Indian Heritage Center Bridge

Provides a Bike/Ped Crossing of American River adjacent to north 12th Street.

TBD Lower Priority

30307 Sacramento City of Sacramento Over/Undercrossing Canterbury Road BridgeProvides Bike/Ped. expansion over State Route 160 at Canterbury Road.

TBD Lower Priority

30314 Sacramento City of Sacramento Over/Undercrossing Del Paso at West CanalProvides Bike/Ped. Crossing of Del Paso Road at the West Canal in North Natomas.

TBD Lower Priority

30313 Sacramento City of Sacramento Over/Undercrossing Del Paso Rd at East DrainProvides Bike/Ped. Connection over Del Paso Rd at the East Drain Canal in North Natomas.

TBD Lower Priority

30278 Sacramento City of Sacramento Over/Undercrossing Discovery ParkProvides Bike/Ped. Connection over the American River for an all weather connection between Natomas and downtown.

TBD Lower Priority

30286 Sacramento City of Sacramento Over/UndercrossingDowntown Natomas Airport Joint Use Bridge

Provides Bike/Ped over American River in line with Truxel Rd.

TBD Lower Priority

30323 Sacramento City of Sacramento Over/Undercrossing El Centro Rd at West CanalProvides Bike/Ped. crossing of El Centro Rd at the West Canal in North Natomas.

TBD Lower Priority

30281 Sacramento City of Sacramento Over/Undercrossing Garden Highway to West SacramentoProvides a Bike/Ped Crossing of Sacramento River from Garden highway to West Sacramento.

TBD Lower Priority

30292 Sacramento City of Sacramento Over/Undercrossing I Street BridgeProvides Bike Ped deck at railroad level over Sacramento River.

TBD Lower Priority

30309 Sacramento City of Sacramento Over/Undercrossing I‐5 Bridge in S. NatomasProvides Bike/Ped. connection over I‐5 between West El Camino Ave and Garden Highway.

TBD Lower Priority

30305 Sacramento City of Sacramento Over/Undercrossing I‐80 Bridge East of Truxel InterchangeProvides Bike/Ped over I‐80 in line with Truxel Rd. Potential joint‐use with LRT crossing.

TBD Lower Priority

30287 Sacramento City of Sacramento Over/Undercrossing I‐80 Bridge(N to S. Natomas)Provides Bike/Ped. Connection over I‐80 at the WAPA Corridor between North & South Natomas.

TBD Lower Priority

30300 Sacramento City of Sacramento Over/Undercrossing National Dr at C1 CanalProvides Bike/Ped. Crossing of C1 Canal at National Dr in North Natomas.

TBD Lower Priority

31122 Sacramento City of Sacramento Over/Undercrossing Natomas Crossing Drive at West CanalProvides Bike/Ped. crossing of Natomas Crossing Dr in North Natomas.

TBD Lower Priority

31123 Sacramento City of Sacramento Over/Undercrossing North Land Park Tunnel Provides Bike/Ped. undercrossing of I‐5 at former RR undercrossing south of Broadway. TBD Lower Priority

30295 Sacramento City of Sacramento Over/Undercrossing Pioneer BridgeProvides Bike/Ped. Connection over Sacramento River by suspending below the Pioneer Bridge (Capitol City Freeway).

TBD Lower Priority

30285 Sacramento City of Sacramento Over/Undercrossing Richards Boulevard Bike/Ped BridgeProvides Bike/Ped over Sacramento River west of Richards Boulevard.

TBD Lower Priority

31310 Sacramento City of Sacramento Over/Undercrossing San Juan Crossing at West CanalProvides Bike/Ped. crossing of San Juan at the West Canal in North Natomas.

TBD Lower Priority

30284 Sacramento City of Sacramento Over/Undercrossing San Juan Rd at I‐80Provides a Bike/Ped Bridge over I‐80 aligned with San Juan Rd.

TBD Lower Priority

30310 Sacramento City of Sacramento Over/Undercrossing San Juan Rd at Ninos ParkwayProvides Bike/Ped. bike trail crossing at San Juan Ave at Ninos Parkway (may be at‐grade)

TBD Lower Priority

30277 Sacramento City of Sacramento Over/Undercrossing Sutter Landing BridgeProvides Bike/Ped. Connection over the American River between the American River Parkway and Sutter Landing Park.

` Lower Priority

30297 Sacramento City of Sacramento Over/Undercrossing Two Rivers Trail Bridge Provides a Bike/Ped Crossing of North12th/North 16th Streets along the south bank of the American River Parkway. TBD Lower Priority

30320 Sacramento City of Sacramento Over/Undercrossing West El Camino Ave at Ninos ParkwayProvides Bike/Ped. bike trail crossing at West El Camino at Ninos Parkway (may be at‐grade)

TBD Lower Priority

30315 Sacramento City of Sacramento Over/Undercrossing West El Camino near Main DrainProvides Bike/Ped. crossing at West El Camino near Main Drain Canal

TBD Lower Priority

31119 Sacramento City of Sacramento Over/Undercrossing 7th Street UnderpassProvides Bike/Ped. undercrossing of U.P.R.R. west of 7th St.

TBD Medium Priority

30289 Sacramento City of Sacramento Over/Undercrossing Bridge at Redding to FolsomProvides Bike/Ped. Connection under Railroad mainline connecting Redding Avenue to Folsom Boulevard.

TBD Medium Priority

30279 Sacramento City of Sacramento Over/Undercrossing Cosumnes River College CrossingProvides Bike/Ped bridge from Sunny Creek Way to CRB across Union House Creek.

TBD Medium Priority

30318 Sacramento City of Sacramento Over/Undercrossing Del Paso Boulevard BridgeProvides a Bike/Ped Crossing of Del Paso Boulevard at the floodgates along the north bank of the American River Parkway.

TBD Medium Priority

30304 Sacramento City of Sacramento Over/Undercrossing East Drain at Sump 20Provides Bike/Ped. Connection over East Drain Canal near Sump 20 in North Natomas.

TBD Medium Priority

Page 23 of 59




30298 Sacramento City of Sacramento Over/Undercrossing Gateway Park Boulevard at C1 CanalProvides Bike/Ped. Crossing of C1 Canal at Gateway Park Boulevard in North Natomas.

TBD Medium Priority

30283 Sacramento City of Sacramento Over/Undercrossing Glenn Hall Park BridgeProvides Bike/Ped. Connection over the American River between the American River Parkway and the Riverpark neighborhood.

TBD Medium Priority

31308 Sacramento City of Sacramento Over/UndercrossingGuy West Bridge Maintenance (painting)

Guy West Bridge Maintenance (painting) TBD Medium Priority

30293 Sacramento City of Sacramento Over/Undercrossing H Street BridgeProvides Bike/Ped. Path on the north side of the H Street bridge.

TBD Medium Priority

30296 Sacramento City of Sacramento Over/Undercrossing Haggin Oaks Crossing Provides Bike/Ped. Connection over railroad tracks and Arcade Creek connecting north Sacramento to Haggin Oaks Bike Trail. TBD Medium Priority

31121 Sacramento City of Sacramento Over/Undercrossing Howe Avenue Bridge (Northbound)Provides Bike/Ped. Path on east side of northbound Howe Avenue Bridge

TBD Medium Priority

30290 Sacramento City of Sacramento Over/Undercrossing I‐80 Bridge(N to S. Natomas)Provides Bike/Ped. connection over I‐80 near Bannon Creek between North & South Natomas.

TBD Medium Priority

30311 Sacramento City of Sacramento Over/Undercrossing Land Park I‐5 BridgeProvides a bike/ped crossing of Interstate 5 by expanding the Land Park Railroad Bridge.

TBD Medium Priority

30317 Sacramento City of Sacramento Over/Undercrossing Main Avenue Low Flow BridgeProvides a low flow bike/ped crossing of Steelhead Creek in the vicinity of Main Avenue Bridge.

TBD Medium Priority

30299 Sacramento City of Sacramento Over/Undercrossing Northgate Boulevard at C1 CanalProvides Bike/Ped. Crossing of Northgate Boulevard at the C1 Canal in North Natomas.

TBD Medium Priority

30308 Sacramento City of Sacramento Over/Undercrossing Pilgrim Court BridgeProvides a Bike/Ped Crossing of Arcade Creek at Pilgrim Court between Los Robles Boulevard and Del Paso Boulevard.

TBD Medium Priority

30303 Sacramento City of Sacramento Over/Undercrossing R Street/Garden Street Bridge Provides Bike Ped Connection over Sacramento River at R Street. TBD Medium Priority

30280 Sacramento City of Sacramento Over/Undercrossing River Plaza Dr at main Drain CanalProvides Bike/Ped. crossing over Main Drain Canal connecting River Plaza Dr.

TBD Medium Priority

30301 Sacramento City of Sacramento Over/UndercrossingSouth of El Camino at Main Drain Canal

Provides Bike/Ped. crossing over Main Drain Canal at Bike trail south of A‐1 Market.

TBD Medium Priority

30294 Sacramento City of Sacramento Over/Undercrossing State Route 99 at Calvine BridgeProvides a Bike/Ped Crossing of State Route 99 north of Calvine Road.

TBD Medium Priority

30302 Sacramento City of Sacramento Over/Undercrossing Town Center Pedestrian BridgeProvides Ped. Connection over Del Paso Boulevard at the Town Center in NorthNatomas.

TBD Medium Priority

30322 Sacramento City of Sacramento Over/Undercrossing West Canal Crossing at El CentroRdProvides Bike/Ped. connection over West Canal at El Centro Rd in North Natomas.

TBD Medium Priority

Page 24 of 59

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!! !

!!

!

! !!!!

!

! ! !!!

! !!

! !

!

!!! !! !!

! !! !

!!! !!!

! !

!!

! ! !! ! !

!!

! ! !! !!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!

! !!!

!

!

! !! !!!!

!!! !

!

! !!!

!

!!!! !

!!

!

!

!!

!!

!!

!!!

!! !

!!

!!

!

!

!!

!!

! !!

!!

!!

! !!

!!!

! !

!

!!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

50 J ST

WATT

AVE

80

L STH STP ST

FRUITRIDGE RD

HOW

E AVE

Q ST

I ST

E ST

X ST

BROADWAY

BELL

ST

FOLSOM BLVD

GARDEN HWY

SAN JUAN RD

W ST

RIO

LINDA

BLV

DDEL PASO RD

EL CAMINO AVE

BELL AVE

N ST

14TH AVE

FULT

ON AV

E

ROSEVILL

E RD

ELKHORN BLVD

TRUX

EL R

D

W ELKHORN BLVD

RIVERSIDE BLVD

JEFFE

RSON BL

VD

47TH AVE

DRY C

REEK

RD

5TH S

T

STOCKTON BLVD

S WAT

T AVE

DEL PASO BLVD

EDISON AVE

21ST

ST

9TH S

TFR

EEPO

RT BL

VD FRANKLIN BLVD

W EL CAMINO AVE

AUBURN BLVD

C ST

NORT

HGAT

E BL

VD

G ST

MARCONI AVE

GRAND AVE

ARDEN WAY

F ST

ELDER CREEK RD

29TH

ST

2ND AVE

7TH S

T

20TH

ST

POWE

R IN

N RD

EL C

ENTR

O RD

E COMMERCE WAY

NORW

OOD

AVE

SOUTH AVE

FAIR OAKS BLVD

24TH

ST

19TH

STNORTH AVE

MORS

E AVE

16TH

ST

T ST LA R I VIERA DR30TH

STW

2ND

ST

ARENA BLVD

RALE

Y BLV

D

LEMON HILL AVE

HURLEY WAY

21ST AVE

65TH

ST

WEST CAPITOL AVE

FLOR

IN P

ERKI

NS R

D

DUCKHORN DR

COTTAGE WAY

JACKSON RD

34TH

ST

NATO

MAS

BLVD

S LA

ND P

ARK D

RN PARK DR

SOUT

H RIVER RD

LAND

PARK

DR

65TH

STRE

ET E

XPY

43RD AVE

ALTA ARDEN EXPY

ELVAS AVE

S ST

AMERICAN RIVER DR

MAIN AVE

LA SIERRA DR

NORTHROP AVE

12TH

ST

REED AVE

PARK B

LVD

LINDEN RD

POPE AVE

A ST

SIERRA BLVD

KIEFER BLVD

EXPOSITION BLVD

WHITNEY AVE

59TH

ST

RICHARDS BLVD

N MARKET BLVD

ARCADE BLVDMA

RTIN

LUTH

ER KI

NG JR

BLV

D

INDUSTRIAL BLVD

FRON

T ST

CAPITOL AVE

K ST

W E ST

3RD

ST

STON

EGAT

E DRNO

RRIS

AVE

MYRTLE AVE

N FREE WAY BLVD

SACRAMENTO AVE

41ST AVE

AZEVEDO DR

35TH AVE

51ST

ST

ANNA ST

JACKSON ST

39TH

ST

N B ST

GATE

WAY P

ARK

BLVD

SOUTHPORT PKY

CARRIE STCA

RLSON DR

GL ORIA

DR

IRVIN WAY

15TH ST

FORD RD

MCKINL E Y BLVD

FEE D RJIBBOOM ST

SUTTERVILLE RD

W RIVER DR

GATEWAY OAKS DR

BELVEDERE AVE

26TH AVE

WINT

ERS

ST

EVERGREEN AVEMERKL EY AVE

TOWER BRIDGE GTWY

56TH

ST

HIGGINS RD

DO N JULI O BLVD

KINGS WAY

NORTH HARBOR BLVD

VILLAGE PKY

STONE BLVD

MICHIGAN BLVD

4TH

ST

LIGHTHOUSE DR

12TH AVE

ORCHARD LN

UNIVE R SITY A VE

SEAMAS AVE

MONTC LAIRE ST

WRIG

HT ST

NEW MARKET DR

N BEND DR

BRIDGECROSS D R

ELEANOR AVE

ETHA

N WA

Y

LEISURE LN

MAYBROOK DR

HARV

ARD S

T

WILHAGGIN DR

VALLEJO WAY

ASTO

RIA S

T

LAWRENCE DR

BLAIR AVE

RICE AVE

MARNICE RD

PINE

ST

6TH

ST

H ST

39TH

STT ST

50

24TH

ST

80

I ST

ORCHARD LN

I ST

24TH ST

LINDEN RD

C ST

16TH

ST

AUBURN BLVD

MAIN AVE

E ST

C ST

24TH

ST

I ST

ELVAS AVE

51ST

ST

C ST

3RD S

T

E ST

Sacramento:North


! SchoolsCities


J ST

FLORIN RD

24TH

ST

FRANKLIN BLVD

L ST

POWE

R IN

N RD

H ST

FRUITRIDGE RD

P STQ ST

HOW

E AVE

WATT

AVE

FREE

PORT

BLVD

50 EB

STOCKTON BLVD

X ST

S RIVER RD

E ST

BROADWAY

50 WB

FOLSOM BLVD

W ST

EL CAMINO AVE

RIVER

SIDE B

LVD

BELL

ST

CENTER PKY

GARDEN H WY

S WAT

T AVE

N ST

14TH AVE

47TH AVE

5TH S

T

MACK RD

GERBER RD

JEFFE

RSON BL

VD

FULT

ON AV

E

16TH

ST

POCKET RD

9TH S

T

W EL CAMINO AVE

ELDER CREEK RD

MARCONI AVE

ARDEN WAY

SHELDON RD

S LA

ND P

ARK D

R

F ST

2ND AVE

7TH S

T

FAIR OAKS BLVD

ELK

GROV

E FL

ORIN

RD

DEL PASO BLVD

FLOR

IN P

ERKI

NS R

D

LA RIVIERA DR

SIMS RD

19TH

ST

MORS

E AVE

GLO R IA D R

T ST

30TH

ST

BR UCEVILLE RD

LEMON HILL AVE

ELSIE AVE

HURLEY WAYRIVE

R RD

G ST

JACKSON RD

21ST AVE

GREENHAVEN DR

COTTAGE WAY

WEST CAPITOL AVE

34TH

ST

MEADOWVIEW RD

SOUT

H RIVER RD

21ST

ST

VALLEY HI DR

65TH

STRE

ET E

XPY

29TH ST

AMERICAN RIVER DR

LAND

PARK

DR

CALVINE RD

AMHERS T S T

43RD AVE

ALTA ARDEN EXPY

ELVAS AVE

AU BERR Y DR

S ST

C ST

KIEFER BLVD

LA SIERRA DR

NORTHROP AVE

65TH ST

PARK B

LVD

LINDEN RD

SIERRA BLVD

JA CINTO AVE

EXPOSITION BLVD

MART

IN LU

THER

KING

JR B

LVD

59TH

ST

RICHARDS BLVD

HAVENSIDE DR

REED AVE

FRON

T ST

CAPITOL AVE

K ST

3RD

ST

FREN

CH R

D

COSUMNES RIVER BLVD

RUSH R IVER DR

STON

EGAT

E DR

INDUSTRIAL BLVD

SACRAMENTO AVE

41ST AVE

66TH AVE

35TH AVE

51ST

ST

STEVENSON AVE

ANNA ST

W STOCKTON BLVD

39TH

ST

N B ST

EHRHARDT AVE

CARRIE ST

CARLS

ON DRIRVIN WAY

15TH ST

ORCHARD LN

MCKINL E Y BLVD

FEE D R

JIBBOOM ST

SUTTERVILLE RDAU

BURN BLVD

TA

NGERINE AVE

W RIVER DR

BELVEDERE AVE

26TH AVE

BROOKFIELD DR

I ST

EVERGREEN AVE

SOUTHPORT PKY

VINT AGE PARK DR

TOWER BRIDGE GTWY

56TH

ST

JOHN STILL DR

KINGS WAY

NORTH HARBOR BLVD

STONE BLVD

MICHIGAN BLVD

PALMER HOUSE DRLIGHTHOUSE DR

53RD AVE

12TH AVE

UNIVE R SITY A VE

SHOR

T RD

SEAMAS AVE

SKY PKY

COTT

ONW

OOD

LN

WRIG

HT ST

VILLAGE PKY

ELEANOR AVE

ETHA

N WA

Y

WILBUR W AY

LEISURE LN

WYNDHAM DR

FOUR SEASONS DR

EVERGREEN ST

WILHAGGIN DR

VALLEJO WAY

ARMADALE WAY

LAWRENCE DR

SHAS

TA LIL

Y DR

BLAIR AVE

RICE AVE

JULLIARD DR

BIG HORN BLVD

PINE

ST

6TH

ST

WRIG

HT ST

24TH ST

29TH

ST

CALVINE RD

65TH

ST

C ST

T ST

LINDEN RD

39TH

ST

I ST

51ST

ST

SIMS RD

C ST3R

D ST

21ST

ST

ELVAS AVE

24TH

ST15TH

ST

City of Sacramento:South


! SchoolsCities





SACRAMENTO COUNTY30324 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Cottage Park Path Morse Avenue to Cottage Way Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $119,000 Higher Priority30325 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Jan Drive Path Jan Drive to Jan Drive Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $81,000 Higher Priority30326 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Oleander Drive Connection Oleander Drive to Oleander Drive Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $127,500 Higher Priority30327 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Phoenix Park Path Groff Drive to Sunset Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $314,500 Higher Priority30328 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Arnold Avenue Path Peacekeeper Way to Palm Street Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $281,000 Higher Priority30329 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Falcon View Path Falcon View Drive to Poker Lane Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $204,000 Higher Priority30330 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Phoenix/Windsock Connector Windsock Avenue to Phoenix Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $26,000 Higher Priority30331 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Santa Anita Park Path Hernando Road to Bell Street Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $281,000 Higher Priority30332 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Arcade Creek Path Winding Way to Citrus Heights C.L. Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $11,368,000 Higher Priority30333 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Watt Avenue Paseo Path Freedom Park Drive to U Street Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $1,680,000 Higher Priority30334 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Q Street Path Watt Avenue to 32nd Street Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $567,000 Higher Priority30335 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Cowan School Path Becerra Way to Clairidge Way Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $79,000 Higher Priority30336 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Patrol Road Dean Street to Kelly Way Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $3,887,000 Higher Priority30337 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Elkhorn Path Watt Avenue to Patrol Road Path Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $996,000 Higher Priority30338 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Robla Creek Path Watt Avenue to Patrol Road Path Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $643,000 Higher Priority

30339 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Placer Mine Connector Jedediah Smith Memorial Path to Placer Mine Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $511,000 Higher Priority

30340 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Teichert Conveyor Path Folsom Boulevard to Kiefer Boulevard Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $5,054,000 Higher Priority30341 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Grant Avenue Path Grant Avenue to Grant Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $76,000 Higher Priority30342 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) I‐5 Path Sacramento C.L. to Sacramento C.L. Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $1,815,000 Higher Priority30343 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Sunrise Boulevard Path Folsom Boulevard to Bridge Street Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $15,800 Higher Priority30344 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Curragh Downs Path Illinois Avenue to Curragh Downs Drive Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $61,000 Higher Priority30345 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Florin Creek Path Fleming Ave to Florin‐Perkins Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $1,720,000 Higher Priority30346 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Q Street Path Sorento Road to Q Street Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $519,000 Higher Priority30347 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Track Crossing Path Unnamed Road to Roseville Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $114,000 Higher Priority

30348 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Morrison Creek PathConstruct approximately 1.75 miles of trail from Watt Ave. to Bradshaw Rd.

1.75 Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $7,836,000 Higher Priority

30349 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Alder Creek Path Hazel Avenue to Empire Ranch Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $5,549,000 Higher Priority30350 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Waterman Path Elder Creek Path to CCTC Path Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $737,000 Higher Priority30351 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) New Class I 9th Street to New Class 1 Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $1,984,000 Higher Priority30352 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) New Class I U Street to Cherry Brook Drive Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $987,000 Higher Priority30353 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Gerber Creek Path Elder Creek Path to Florin Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $3,660,000 Higher Priority30354 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) New Class I El Verano Avenue to Gibson Ranch Park Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $2,291,000 Higher Priority30355 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) New Class I U Street to Placer County Line Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $1,504,000 Higher Priority30356 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Elder Creek Path Folsom South Canal Path to Sacramento C.L. Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $19,390,000 Higher Priority30357 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Golden Gate Avenue Path Golden Gate Avenue to Golden Gate Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $102,000 Higher Priority

30358 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Sacramento Northern PathJedediah Smith Memorial Path to Placer County Line

Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $1,200,000 Higher Priority

30359 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Escobar Way Connector So. American River Path to Escobar Way Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $92,000 Higher Priority30390 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Calvine Road Trail Bruceville Road to Calvine Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $543,000 Lower Priority

30391 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Northrop Avenue Trail Northrop Ave to Jedediah Smith Memorial Path Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $20,000 Lower Priority

30392 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Florin Creek Path Palmer House Drive to Persimmon Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $1,200,000 Lower Priority30393 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Ascot Avenue Connector Nemdec Path to Ascot Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $128,000 Lower Priority30394 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Elk Grove UPRR Path Cosumnes River Path to Elk Grove Creek Path Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $2,431,000 Lower Priority30395 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) L Street Path Teichert Mine Path to L Street Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $77,000 Lower Priority30396 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Laguna Creek Path Elk Grove C.L. to Deer Creek Path Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $19,160,000 Lower Priority30397 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Nemdec Path Del Paso Road to Sutter County Line Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $4,568,000 Lower Priority

30398 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Pershing Avenue Path Main Avenue to Jedediah Smith Memorial Path Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $753,000 Lower Priority

30399 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Hedge Avenue Path McCoy Ave to Elder Creek Path Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $1,350,000 Lower Priority30400 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Gardner Avenue Path Elder Creek Path to Sacramento CL Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $1,173,000 Lower Priority30401 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Rogers Road Path Florin Road to Churchhill Downs Park Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $1,200,000 Lower Priority30402 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) New Path Leland Ave to Rogers Rd Path Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $844,000 Lower Priority30403 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Passalis Ln Path Elder Creek Path to Union House Creek Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $853,000 Lower Priority30404 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) River Road Path Sacramento C.L. to Sutter County Line Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $37,468,000 Lower Priority30405 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Stone Lakes Refuge Path I‐5 to Sacramento River Path Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $1,632,000 Lower Priority30406 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) North WPA Powerline Path Connecting Linda Creek to Granite Ave Trail and Sant 2.5 2007 Bike Ped Regional Plan TBD Lower Priority30360 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Tillotson Parkway Power Inn Road to Smedberg Middle School Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $294,000 Medium Priority30361 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Elm Avenue Path Elm Avenue to Elm Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $102,000 Medium Priority30362 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) White Rock Path Grant Line Road to El Dorado County Line Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $4,683,000 Medium Priority30363 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Grant Line Path Mosher Road to White Rock Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $7,567,000 Medium Priority30364 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) So. American River Path Watt Avenue to Gristmill Park Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $2,233,000 Medium Priority30365 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Ascot Avenue Path 4th Street to Dry Creek Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $819,000 Medium Priority30366 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Sailor Bar Path Natomas Street to Illinois Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $966,000 Medium Priority30367 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Dry Creek Path Ueda Path to Placer County Line Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $5,568,000 Medium Priority30368 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Gibson Ranch Park Road Unnamed Road to End Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $222,000 Medium Priority30369 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Union Pacific RR Path Sacramento C.L. to Florin Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $17,657,000 Medium Priority30370 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) New Class I Connector Harvest Falls Drive to Dry Creek Path Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $102,000 Medium Priority30371 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Santa Juanita Path Oak Avenue to Placer County Line Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $783,000 Medium Priority30372 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) I‐5 Path Connector I‐5 Path to Sacramento River Path Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $12,340,000 Medium Priority30373 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Mercantile Drive Connector Folsom South Canal Path to Mercantile Drive Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $90,000 Medium Priority30374 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) New Class I Connector Dry Creek Path to U Street Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $89,000 Medium Priority30375 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Placer County Trail Hickory Avenue to Santa Juanita Trail Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $1,925,000 Medium Priority30376 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Routier Path Old Placerville Road to SR 160 Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $2,276,000 Medium Priority

Page 25 of 59




30377 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) I‐5 Path Connector Dwight Road to I‐5 Path Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $887,000 Medium Priority30378 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Granite Avenue Path Granite Avenue to Hadleigh Drive Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $367,000 Medium Priority

30379 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Arden Way Connector (Additional) Jedediah Smith Memorial Path to Arden Way Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $121,000 Medium Priority

30380 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Placerville Road Path Folsom C.L. to El Dorado County Line Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $8,428,000 Medium Priority

30381 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I)WPA Powerline Path (part of the Dry Creek Regional Network)

Fair Oaks Boulevard to Hazel Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $2,804,000 Medium Priority

30382 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) CCTC Path Power Inn Road to San Joaquin C.L. Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $2,499,000 Medium Priority30383 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Mayhew Drain Path Folsom Boulevard to So. American River Path Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $684,000 Medium Priority30384 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Deer Creek Path Alder Creek Path to Cosumnes River Path Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $1,190,000 Medium Priority

30385 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Folsom South Canal Path Twin Cities Road to Jedediah Smith Memorial Path Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $1,345,000 Medium Priority

30386 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Cosumnes River Path Mokelumne River Path to El Dorado County Line Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $2,932,000 Medium Priority

30387 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Isleton‐Stone Lakes Path Walnut Grove to Sacramento River Path Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $1,132,000 Medium Priority30388 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Mokelumne River Path Cosumnes River Path to SR 12 Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $1,558,000 Medium Priority30389 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Sacramento River Path Hood‐Franklin Road to Sacramento C.L. Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $6,437,000 Medium Priority

30844 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Southgate: Florin Creek TrailAcquire and construct approximately 1.4 miles of trail from Power Inn Rd. to Florin Perkins Rd.

1.4 Sacramento County BMP, Southgate Recreation and Park Dist $1,100,970

30845 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I)Southgate: Central California Traction Railroad

Acquire and construct approximately 4.8 miles of trail from Calvine Rd. to South Watt Avenue


30847 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Southgate: Gerber CreekAcquire and construct approximately 1 mile of trail outside of plan areas from Gerber Rd. to Florin Rd.

1 Sacramento County BMP, Southgate Recreation and Park Dist $1,424,850

30849 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Southgate: Folsom South CanalSignage and safe crossings on the trail at all intersections and access points from Jackson Hwy. to Grant Line Rd.

‐ Sacramento County BMP, Southgate Recreation and Park Dist TBD

30850 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Southgate: Tillotson ParkwayRepair, replace, and reconstruct from Power Inn Rd. to Smedberg Middle School

‐ Sacramento County BMP, Southgate Recreation and Park Dist TBD

30842 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Southgate: Morrison Creek Construct approximately 1.75 miles of trail from Hedge Ave. to Bradshaw Rd.


30843 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) South Gate: Florin Creek Trail

Replace lighting in Hwy 99 pedestrian/bicycle tunnel, repair and reconstruct approximately 1.26 miles of trail from Persimmon Ave. to Rutter Middle School, reconstruct retaining wall, remove & replace existing bollards add trail signage

1.26 Sacramento County BMP, Southgate Recreation and Park Dist TBD

30846 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Southgate: Elder Creek Acquire and construct portions of trail outside of plan areas from Hwy. 99 to Jackson Hwy. Approximately 5 miles of trail.

5 Sacramento County BMP portions included in Florin Vineyard $4,300,390

30848 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Southgate: Laguna Creek ParkwayAcquire and construct approximately 4 miles of trail outside of financing plan areas from Excelsior Rd. to Folsom South Canal

4 Sacramento County BMP, Southgate Recreation and Park Dist $5,989,950

30851 Sacramento Sacramento County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Southgate: Tillotson ParkwayAcquire and construct last 0.5 mile segment of trail from Smedberg Middle School to Laguna Creek Parkway

0.5 Sacramento County BMP, Southgate Recreation and Park Dist $459,100

30407 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Morse Avenue Cottage Way to Fair Oaks Boulevard Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $96,000 Higher Priority30408 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) California Avenue Jan Drive to Oak Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $90,000 Higher Priority30409 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Hurley Way Ethan Way to Watt Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $613,000 Higher Priority30410 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Dewey Drive Citrus Heights C.L. to Winding Way Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $486,000 Higher Priority30411 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Edison Avenue Watt Avenue to Pasadena Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $172,000 Higher Priority30412 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Northrop Avenue Watt Avenue to End Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $66,000 Higher Priority30413 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Winding Way Auburn Boulevard to San Juan Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $968,000 Higher Priority30414 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Saverien Drive Fair Oaks Boulevard to American River Drive Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $16,000 Higher Priority30415 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) 47th Street 47th Avenue to 51st Street Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $19,000 Higher Priority30416 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Engle Avenue Norris Avenue to Fair Oaks Boulevard Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $101,000 Higher Priority30417 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Garfield Avenue Greenback Lane to Fair Oaks Boulevard Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $206,000 Higher Priority30418 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Hemlock Street Myrtle Avenue to Palm Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $24,000 Higher Priority30419 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Walerga Road Palm Avenue to Placer County Line Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $333,000 Higher Priority30420 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Morse Avenue Marconi Avenue to El Camino Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $24,000 Higher Priority30421 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Eastern Avenue Edison Avenue to Fair Oaks Boulevard Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $429,000 Higher Priority30422 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Cottage Way Ethan Way to Watt Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $611,000 Higher Priority30423 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Palmer House Drive Florin Road to Gerber Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $50,000 Higher Priority30424 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Mission Avenue Engle Avenue to Fair Oaks Boulevard Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $99,000 Higher Priority30425 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Morse Avenue Auburn Boulevard to Marconi Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $51,000 Higher Priority30426 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Sunset Avenue Isabella Avenue to Main Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $204,000 Higher Priority30427 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Grant Avenue Sue Pam Way to End Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $47,000 Higher Priority30428 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Pershing Avenue Kenneth Avenue to Madison Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $24,000 Higher Priority30429 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) 34th Street U Street to Freedom Park Drive Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $599,000 Higher Priority30430 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Beech Avenue Pershing Avenue to Oak Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $95,000 Higher Priority30431 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Sutter Avenue Fair Oaks Boulevard to Hollister Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $71,000 Higher Priority30432 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Whitney Avenue Morse Avenue to Sue Pam Drive Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $994,000 Higher Priority30433 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Folsom Boulevard South Watt Avenue to Rancho Cordova C.L. Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $983,000 Higher Priority30434 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Walnut Avenue Winding Way to Fair Oaks Boulevard Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $70,000 Higher Priority30435 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) College Oak Drive Winding Way to Palm Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $433,000 Higher Priority

Page 26 of 59




30437 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Myrtle Avenue Roseville Road to I‐80 Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $48,000 Higher Priority30438 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Oak Avenue Fair Oaks Boulevard to California Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $19,000 Higher Priority30440 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Central Avenue Woodmore Oaks Drive to Santa Juanita Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $157,000 Higher Priority30441 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Marconi Avenue SR 51 to Fair Oaks Boulevard Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $1,034,000 Higher Priority30442 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) U Street 24th Street to Watt Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $453,000 Higher Priority30443 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Diablo Drive Hillsdale Boulevard to Roseville Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $98,000 Higher Priority30444 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Kenneth Avenue Oak Avenue to Winding Way Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $1,180,000 Higher Priority30446 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Sue Pam Way Whitney Avenue to Grant Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $6,000 Higher Priority30447 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Illinois Avenue Sailor Bar to Greenback Lane Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $132,000 Higher Priority30448 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Poplar Boulevard Wings Way to A Street Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $17,000 Higher Priority30449 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Manzanita Avenue Auburn Boulevard to Fair Oaks Boulevard Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $26,000 Higher Priority30452 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) MLK Jr. Boulevard Fruitridge Road to Franklin Boulevard Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $7,000 Higher Priority30453 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Bell Street Auburn Boulevard to Northrop Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $123,000 Higher Priority30454 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Main Avenue Sunset Avenue to Oak Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $1,031,000 Higher Priority30456 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Filbert Avenue Pershing Avenue to Oak Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $105,000 Higher Priority30457 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Auburn Boulevard Howe Avenue to Citrus Heights C.L. Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $1,831,000 Higher Priority30458 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Roseville Road Sacramento C.L. to Antelope Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $1,014,000 Higher Priority30459 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Elverta Road Rio Linda Boulevard to Antelope Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $1,601,000 Higher Priority30463 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Winding Way San Juan Avenue to Fair Oaks Boulevard Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $59,000 Higher Priority30464 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Palm Avenue Roseville Road to I‐80 Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $49,000 Higher Priority30465 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Lincoln Avenue Manzanita Avenue to San Juan Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $93,000 Higher Priority30468 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Orangevale Avenue Main Avenue to Folsom City Limits Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $12,000 Higher Priority30469 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Power Inn Road Sacramento C.L. to Geneva Point Drive Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $383,000 Higher Priority30470 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Hillsdale Boulevard Madison Avenue to Elkhorn Boulevard Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $708,000 Higher Priority30471 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) South Watt Avenue Folsom Boulevard to Florin Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $1,589,000 Higher Priority30472 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Rio Linda Boulevard Elverta Road to Sacramento C.L. Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $772,000 Higher Priority30473 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Lumina Way Sheraton Drive to Treecrest Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $30,000 Higher Priority30474 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) James Way Dudley Boulevard to Watt Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $76,000 Higher Priority30475 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) A Street Watt Avenue to Poplar Boulevard Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $22,000 Higher Priority30477 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Morse Avenue El Camino Avenue to Cottage Park Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $18,000 Higher Priority30478 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Palm Drive Fair Oaks Boulevard to California Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $18,000 Higher Priority30480 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) 24th Street U Street to McClellan Perimeter Road Trail Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $108,000 Higher Priority30481 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Hickory Avenue Greenback Lane to End Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $96,000 Higher Priority30482 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Myrtle Avenue I‐80 to Hemlock Street Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $64,000 Higher Priority30483 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) San Juan Avenue Madison Avenue to End Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $428,000 Higher Priority30490 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Wilbur Way Gerber Road to Elsie Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $25,000 Higher Priority30491 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Oak Avenue Wachtel Way to Folsom C.L. Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $755,000 Higher Priority30492 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Old Placerville Road Bradshaw Road to Rancho Cordova C.L. Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $661,000 Higher Priority30493 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) 65th Street Expy. Florin Road to Sacramento C.L. Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $191,000 Higher Priority30495 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) 47th Avenue UPRR (Sac C.L.) to Sacramento C.L. Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $98,000 Higher Priority30497 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Franklin Boulevard Fruitridge Road to Sacramento C.L. Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $73,000 Higher Priority30499 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Dry Creek Road U Street to Ascot Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $753,000 Higher Priority30500 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Winding Way Fair Oaks Boulevard to Hazel Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $113,000 Higher Priority30501 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Fair Oaks Boulevard Howe Avenue to Citrus Heights C.L. Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $3,183,000 Higher Priority30502 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Stockton Boulevard Sacramento C.L. to E. Stockton Boulevard Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $106,000 Higher Priority30504 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Franklin Boulevard Elk Grove C.L. to San Joaquin C.L. Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $2,921,000 Higher Priority30507 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Don Julio Blvd. 32nd Street to Placer County Line Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $918,000 Higher Priority30508 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Antelope Road Watt Avenue to Citrus Heights C.L. Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $220,000 Higher Priority30510 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Wilton Road Dillard Road to Grant Line Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $957,000 Higher Priority30511 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Waterman Road New Connector to Calvine Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $221,000 Higher Priority30512 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Q Street Marysville Boulevard to Watt Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $237,000 Higher Priority30513 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Grant Line Road SR 99 to White Rock Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $499,000 Higher Priority30515 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Gerber Road Stockton Boulevard to Excelsior Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $2,070,000 Higher Priority30516 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Santa Juanita Avenue Central Avenue to Placer County Line Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $116,000 Higher Priority30518 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Dillard Road SR 160 to SR 99 Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $4,391,000 Higher Priority30520 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Bradshaw Road Mira Del Rio Drive to Folsom Blvd Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $209,000 Higher Priority30523 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Marmith Avenue Hemlock Street to Garfield Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $9,000 Higher Priority30524 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Watt Avenue Placer County Line to Folsom Boulevard Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $3,099,000 Higher Priority30526 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Butterfield Way Stoughton Way to Oates Drive Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $23,000 Higher Priority30527 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Central Avenue Sacramento Street to Winding Way Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $4,000 Higher Priority30528 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Arden Way Ethan Way to McClaren Drive Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $992,000 Higher Priority30529 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Pasadena Avenue Auburn Boulevard to Winding Way Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $430,000 Higher Priority30530 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Norris Avenue Auburn Boulevard to Engle Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $33,000 Higher Priority30531 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Elk Grove‐Florin Road Florin Road to Calvine Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $444,000 Higher Priority30533 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Oleander Drive Saint James Drive to End Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $9,000 Higher Priority30534 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Tuolumne Drive La Riviera Drive to La Riviera Drive Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $28,000 Higher Priority30535 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Calvine Road SR 99 to Grant Line Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $1,143,000 Higher Priority30536 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Elsie Avenue Stockton Boulevard to Cottonwood Lane Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $31,000 Higher Priority30537 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Clay Station Road Simmerhorn Road to Dillard Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $547,000 Higher Priority30539 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Woodring Drive Excelsior Road to Eagles Nest Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $73,000 Higher Priority30540 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Goethe Road Mayhew Road to Existing End Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $61,000 Higher Priority30543 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Sunrise Boulevard Rancho Cordova C.L. to Grant Line Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $1,105,000 Higher Priority30547 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Curved Bridge Road Oak Lane to Dry Creek Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $17,000 Higher Priority30548 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Chicago Avenue Winding Way to Yvonne Way Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $37,000 Higher Priority30549 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Elkhorn Boulevard Crossfield Drive to Citrus Heights C.L. Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $3,485,000 Higher Priority30550 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Palm Avenue Garfield Avenue to Manzanita Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $24,000 Higher Priority30551 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Rogue River Drive Whitewater Way to La Riviera Drive Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $22,000 Higher Priority

Page 27 of 59




31208 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Norris Avenue Engle Road to Marconi Avenue $152,000 Higher Priority31209 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Stollwood Drive Winding Way to Lincoln Avenue $35,000 Higher Priority31306 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Winding Oak Drive Madison Avenue to Main Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $49,000 Higher Priority30716 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Hood‐Franklin Road Bruceville Road to Franklin Boulevard Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $836,000 Lower Priority30717 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Hood‐Franklin Road Franklin Boulevard to SR 160 Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $177,000 Lower Priority30718 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Ridgepoint Drive Great Valley Drive to Antelope Road North Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $23,000 Lower Priority30719 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Indian Creek Road Country Creek Drive to Indian Hill Ct Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $7,000 Lower Priority30720 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Scott Road White Rock Road to Latrobe Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $3,137,000 Lower Priority30721 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Ascot Avenue W. 2nd Street to 4th Street Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $25,000 Lower Priority30722 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) 14th Avenue Lissetta Avenue to Stockton Boulevard Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $27,000 Lower Priority30723 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) 20th Street Q Street to Ascot Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $95,000 Lower Priority30724 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Aerojet Road Folsom Boulevard to Easton Valley Parkway Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $145,000 Lower Priority30725 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Arno Road Riley Road to SR 99 Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $72,000 Lower Priority30726 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Country Lake Drive Country Trail Dr to Petite Creek Drive Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $21,000 Lower Priority30727 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Petite Creek Drive Country Lake Drive to Placer County Line Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $11,000 Lower Priority30728 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Stone House Road Latrobe Road to Jackson Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $70,000 Lower Priority30729 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Valensin Road Alta Mesa Road to Colony Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $118,000 Lower Priority30730 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Valensin Road Colony Road to Arno Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $66,000 Lower Priority30731 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) W. Ascot Street W. 6th Street to W. 2nd Street Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $24,000 Lower Priority30732 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Sunrise Gold Circle Sunrise Boulevard to Mercantile Drive Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $44,000 Lower Priority30733 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Mercantile Drive Sunrise Gold Circle to Folsom Boulevard Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $26,000 Lower Priority30734 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) South Bayou Way Airport Boulevard to Sacramento C.L. Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $122,000 Lower Priority30735 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Colony Road Valensin Road to Dillard Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $286,000 Lower Priority30736 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Elder Creek Road South Watt Avenue to Excelsior Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $1,200,000 Lower Priority30737 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Eagles Nest Road Grant Line Road to Douglas Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $1,917,000 Lower Priority30738 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Happy Lane Old Placerville Road to Kiefer Boulevard Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $367,000 Lower Priority30739 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Power Line Road Garden Hwy to Sutter County Line Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $1,814,000 Lower Priority30740 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Cherry Avenue Hazel Avenue to Mountain Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $60,000 Lower Priority30741 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Mather Boulevard Douglas Road to Excelsior Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $47,000 Lower Priority30742 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Crestview Drive Schuyler Drive to Winding Way Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $15,000 Lower Priority30743 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Hazel Avenue White Rock Road to Placer County Line Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $2,226,000 Lower Priority30744 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Airport Boulevard S. Bayou Drive to End Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $1,497,000 Lower Priority30745 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Blake Road Colony Road to Alta Mesa Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $47,000 Lower Priority30746 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Bruceville Road Elk Grove C.L. to Twin Cities Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $292,000 Lower Priority30747 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Conley Road Cherokee Lane to Alta Mesa Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $98,000 Lower Priority30748 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Core Road Ed Rau Road to Franklin Blvd Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $41,000 Lower Priority30749 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Cottonwood Lane Elsie Avenue to Stevenson Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $30,000 Lower Priority30750 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Cresthill Drive Sheldon Lake Drive to Sloughhouse Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $31,000 Lower Priority30751 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Dwight Road Franklin Boulevard to Elk Grove C.L. Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $189,000 Lower Priority30752 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Ed Rau Road Eschinger Road to Core Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $24,000 Lower Priority30753 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Green Road Dillard Road to Wilton Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $781,000 Lower Priority30754 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Hobday Road Colony Road to Folsom South Canal Trail Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $136,000 Lower Priority30755 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Kammerer Road SR 99 to Bruceville Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $1,260,000 Lower Priority30756 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) New Hope Road San Joaquin County Line to Galt C.L. Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $268,000 Lower Priority30757 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Placerville Road Folsom C.L. to White Rock Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $70,000 Lower Priority30758 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Prairie City Road US 50 to White Rock Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $787,000 Lower Priority30759 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Rio Linda Boulevard Elverta Road to Sorrento Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $585,000 Lower Priority30760 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Rising Road Alta Mesa Road to Tavernor Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $24,000 Lower Priority30761 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) San Juan Road Garden Highway to El Centro Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $340,000 Lower Priority30762 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Sheldon Lake Drive Grant Line Road to Cresthill Drive Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $30,000 Lower Priority30763 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Short Road Calvine Road to Tillotson Pkwy Trail Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $24,000 Lower Priority30764 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Sorento Road Elverta Road to Placer County Line Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $424,000 Lower Priority30765 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Tavernor Road Rising Road to Dillard Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $181,000 Lower Priority30766 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Tree View Road SR 16 to End of Existing Roadway Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $12,000 Lower Priority30767 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Unnamed Road El Centro Road to Garden Hwy Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $56,000 Lower Priority30768 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Walmort Road Dillard Road to Alta Mesa Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $176,000 Lower Priority30769 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Waterman Road SR 16 to New Connector Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $1,221,000 Lower Priority30770 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Waterman Road Connector New Connector to New Connector Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $39,000 Lower Priority30771 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Woods Road Colony Road to Alta Mesa Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $47,000 Lower Priority30772 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Golden Gate Avenue Hazel Avenue to Golden Gate Avenue Trail Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $30,000 Lower Priority30773 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Lambert Road Bruceville Road to SR 160 Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $373,000 Lower Priority30774 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Marengo Road Boessow Road to Twin Cities Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $119,000 Lower Priority30775 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Christensen Road New Hope Road to Twin Cities Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $922,000 Lower Priority30776 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Borden Road Twin Cities Road to Clay Station Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $206,000 Lower Priority30777 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Florin‐Perkins Road Sacramento C.L. to Gerber Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $139,000 Lower Priority30778 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) 4th Street Marysville Boulevard to Ascot Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $17,000 Lower Priority30779 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Simmerhorn Road SR 99 to Clay Station Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $323,000 Lower Priority30780 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Ione Road SR 16 to Amador County Line Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $294,000 Lower Priority30781 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Longview Drive Roseville Road to Watt Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $53,000 Lower Priority30782 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Alta Mesa Road Boessow Road to Dillard Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $558,000 Lower Priority30783 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Cherokee Lane Boessow Road to Conley Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $157,000 Lower Priority30784 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Sloughhouse Road Grantline Road to SR 16 Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $204,000 Lower Priority30785 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Sunrise Boulevard Madison Avenue to Rancho Cordova C.L. Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $2,177,000 Lower Priority30786 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Bilby Road Franklin Boulevard to Bruceville Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $633,000 Lower Priority30787 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Boessow Road SR 99 to Alta Mesa Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $144,000 Lower Priority30788 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Kost Road New Hope Road to Galt CL Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $153,000 Lower Priority30789 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Orr Road New Hope Road to Galt CL Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $1,198,000 Lower Priority

Page 28 of 59




30790 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Riley Road Dillard Road to Arno Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $158,000 Lower Priority30791 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) SR 12 San Joaquin County Line to SR 160 Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $1,728,000 Lower Priority30792 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) SR 160 SR 12 to Contra Costa C.L. Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $3,290,000 Lower Priority

30793 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) SR 160Hood‐Franklin Road to Walnut Grove‐Thornton Road

Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $598,000 Lower Priority

30794 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Walnut Grove‐Thornton Road SR 160 to Mokelumne River Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $48,000 Lower Priority30795 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) El Centro Road Arena Blvd to West El Camino Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $562,000 Lower Priority30796 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Eschinger Road SR 99 to Ed Rau Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $259,000 Lower Priority30797 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Kiefer Boulevard Sunrise Boulevard to So. Watt Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $989,000 Lower Priority30798 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Kiefer Boulevard Grant Line Road to SR 16 Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $362,000 Lower Priority30799 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Latrobe Road SR 16 to Michigan Bar Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $345,000 Lower Priority30800 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Jackson Slough Road Terminous Road to SR 12 Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $43,000 Lower Priority30801 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Lone Tree Road Meister Way to W. Elverta Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $767,000 Lower Priority30802 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) McKenzie Road Arno Road to Twin Cities Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $113,000 Lower Priority30803 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Meister Way Metro Air Parkway to Lone Tree Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $153,000 Lower Priority30804 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Michigan Bar Road Latrobe Road to Cosumnes River Trail Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $138,000 Lower Priority30805 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) N. Bayou Way Crossfield Drive to Garden Hwy Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $90,000 Lower Priority30806 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Oxbow Drive Tyler Island Road to Terminous Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $93,000 Lower Priority

30807 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Race Track Road Walnut Grove‐Thornton Road to Tyler Island Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $114,000 Lower Priority

30808 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Reese Road Florin Road to Gerber Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $47,000 Lower Priority30809 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Scott Road US 50 to White Rock Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $574,000 Lower Priority30810 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Terminous Road Jackson Slough Road to Oxbow Drive Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $29,000 Lower Priority30811 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) West El Camino Road El Centro Road to I‐80 Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $67,000 Lower Priority30812 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Aviation Drive Crossfield Drive to Airport Blvd Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $24,000 Lower Priority

30813 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Ascot Avenue Dry Creek Road to McClellan Perimeter Rd. Trail Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $59,000 Lower Priority

30814 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Tyler Island Road Race Track Road to SR 160 Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $251,000 Lower Priority30815 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Metro Air Parkway South Bayou Way to W. Elverta Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $1,230,000 Lower Priority30816 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Elk Grove Boulevard I‐5 to Franklin Boulevard Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $822,000 Lower Priority30817 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Poker Lane Existing Gap to Don Julio Boulevard Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $11,000 Lower Priority30818 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Crossfield Drive Airport Boulevard to Aviation Drive Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $59,000 Lower Priority30819 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Vineyard Road SR 16 to Calvine Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $1,504,000 Lower Priority30820 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Del Paso Road Sacramento C.L. to Natomas Main Drain Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $371,000 Lower Priority

30821 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) N. Market Boulevard Gateway Park Boulevard to Northgate Boulevard Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $452,000 Lower Priority

30822 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Bell Avenue Winters Street to Dayton Street Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $21,000 Lower Priority30823 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) National Drive Del Paso Road to N. Market Boulevard Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $199,000 Lower Priority30824 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Northgate Blvd. I‐80 to Del Paso Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $285,000 Lower Priority30825 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) W. Stockton Road Kammerer Road to Eschinger Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $38,000 Lower Priority30826 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Guthrie Street Don Julio Boulevard to Keema Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $13,000 Lower Priority30827 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Adair Street Elwyn Avenue to 16th Street Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $96,000 Lower Priority30828 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) W. 6th Street Marysville Boulevard to End of Roadway Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $8,000 Lower Priority30829 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Dwight Road Extension Existing Dwight Road to Elk Grove C.L. Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $117,000 Lower Priority30830 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) El Rio Avenue W Delano St to U Street Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $16,000 Lower Priority30831 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Empire Ranch Road US 50 to White Rock Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $385,000 Lower Priority30832 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Gerber Road Excelsior Road to Eagles Nest Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $614,000 Lower Priority30833 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Glenborough Drive Folsom Boulevard to Easton Valley Parkway Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $305,000 Lower Priority30834 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Goethe Road Existing End to Bradshaw Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $106,000 Lower Priority30835 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) New Loop Road 16th Street to 16th Street Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $1,227,000 Lower Priority30836 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) New Road New Loop Road to U Street Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $116,000 Lower Priority30837 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Oak Avenue Parkway US 50 to Easton Valley Parkway Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $147,000 Lower Priority30838 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Rancho Cordova Parkway US 50 to White Rock Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $770,000 Lower Priority

30839 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Tree View Road End of Existing Roadway to Gerber Road Extension Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $95,000 Lower Priority

30840 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Zinfandel Drive Rancho Cordova C.L. to Douglas Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $244,000 Lower Priority

30841 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Easton Valley Parkway Rancho Cordova Parkway to Empire Ranch Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $3,466,000 Lower Priority

30555 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Hilltop Drive Manzanita Avenue to Park Oaks Drive Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $31,000 Medium Priority30556 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) McKinley Avenue Clay Station Road to Twin Cities Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $44,000 Medium Priority30557 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Dudley Boulevard Freedom Park Drive to Winters Street Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $913,000 Medium Priority30558 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) El Rio Avenue Elverta Road to W. Delano St Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $15,000 Medium Priority30560 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Oates Drive Butterfield Way to Bradshaw Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $28,000 Medium Priority30561 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) North Avenue Mission Avenue to Fair Oaks Boulevard Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $70,000 Medium Priority30562 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) SR 16 Sacramento C.L. to Amador County Line Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $8,155,000 Medium Priority30563 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Montclair Street Whitney Avenue to Marconi Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $36,000 Medium Priority30564 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Bruce Way Larry Way to La Cienega Drive Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $10,000 Medium Priority30565 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Ethan Way El Camino Avenue to End Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $631,000 Medium Priority30566 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Aztec Way Elverta Road to Navaho Drive Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $17,000 Medium Priority30567 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Don Crest Lane Bruce Way to La Cienega Drive Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $12,000 Medium Priority30568 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Ellerslee Drive Manzanita Avenue to Rutland Drive Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $7,000 Medium Priority30569 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Falcon View Drive Palmerson Drive to North Loop Boulevard Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $18,000 Medium Priority30570 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Gibbons Drive Walnut Avenue to Garfield Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $24,000 Medium Priority30571 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Gothberg Avenue Larchmont Drive to Weddigen Way Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $13,000 Medium Priority30572 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Kirkby Way Larry Way to Walerga Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $7,000 Medium Priority30573 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) McKay Street Madison Avenue to Treecrest Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $15,000 Medium Priority

Page 29 of 59




30574 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Rustic Road Papaya Drive to Winding Way Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $9,000 Medium Priority30576 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Westcamp Road Rimwood Drive to Fair Oaks Boulevard Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $7,000 Medium Priority30577 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Winona Way Roseville Road to Watt Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $20,000 Medium Priority30578 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Tributary Point Drive Tributary Crossing Drive to Hazel Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $19,000 Medium Priority30580 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) White Rock Road Sunrise Boulevard to El Dorado County Line Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $4,471,000 Medium Priority30581 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) 10th Street Oak Lane to U Street Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $22,000 Medium Priority30582 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) W. 6th Street End of Roadway to Ascot Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $639,000 Medium Priority30583 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Twin Cities Road River Road to Amador County Line Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $9,266,000 Medium Priority30584 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) El Camino Avenue Ethan Way to Fair Oaks Boulevard Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $1,511,000 Medium Priority30585 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Black Eagle Drive Watt Avenue to Redwater Drive Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $19,000 Medium Priority30586 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Date Avenue Myrtle Avenue to Madison Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $23,000 Medium Priority30587 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Falcon View Drive North Loop Boulevard to End Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $18,000 Medium Priority30588 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) La Cienega Drive Don Julio Boulevard to Larchmont Drive Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $16,000 Medium Priority30590 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Longdale Drive Walerga Road to Keema Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $27,000 Medium Priority30591 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Northham Drive Redwater Drive to Elverta Drive Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $26,000 Medium Priority30592 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Sprig Drive Elkhorn Boulevard to Don Julio Boulevard Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $18,000 Medium Priority

30593 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Tributary Crossing Drive Gold Country Boulevard to Tributary Point Drive Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $5,000 Medium Priority

30594 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Robertson Avenue Watt Avenue to Eastern Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $48,000 Medium Priority30595 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Alta Arden Expy. Ethan Way to Watt Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $401,000 Medium Priority30596 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) 16th Street Q Street to Placer County Line Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $699,000 Medium Priority30597 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Marysville Blvd. W. 6th Street to Rio Linda Blvd Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $679,000 Medium Priority30598 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Robertson Avenue Mission Avenue to Fair Oaks Boulevard Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $69,000 Medium Priority30599 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) W. 2nd Street U Street to Ascot Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $115,000 Medium Priority30600 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Pope Avenue Fulton Avenue to Watt Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $47,000 Medium Priority30601 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) McDermott Drive Galbrath Drive to Elkhorn Boulevard Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $17,000 Medium Priority30602 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Palm Street Dudley Boulevard to Watt Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $67,000 Medium Priority30603 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Hackberry Lane Palm Avenue to Cypress Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $94,000 Medium Priority30604 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Barrett Road Winding Way to Lincoln Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $29,000 Medium Priority30605 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Blackfoot Way Watt Avenue to Navaho Drive Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $33,000 Medium Priority30606 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Kenneth Avenue Mission Avenue to Garfield Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $47,000 Medium Priority30607 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Landis Avenue Fair Oaks Boulevard to California Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $18,000 Medium Priority30608 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Minnesota Avenue Sunset Avenue to Winding Way Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $26,000 Medium Priority30609 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Poker Lane Elverta Road to Existing Gap Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $13,000 Medium Priority30610 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Madison Avenue Roseville Road to Greenback Lane Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $2,672,000 Medium Priority30611 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) 2nd Street U Street to Ascot Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $117,000 Medium Priority30612 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Heartland Drive Don Julio Boulevard to Palmerson Drive Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $19,000 Medium Priority30613 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Pecan Avenue Pershing Avenue to Elm Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $73,000 Medium Priority30614 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Stanley Avenue Fair Oaks Boulevard to Marshall Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $48,000 Medium Priority30615 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Almond Avenue Oak Avenue to Greenback Lane Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $72,000 Medium Priority30616 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Wildridge Drive Primrose Drive to Rimwood Drive Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $20,000 Medium Priority30617 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Stewart Road Arden Way to Fair Oaks Boulevard Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $38,000 Medium Priority30620 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Iona Way Elsie Avenue to Turnbury Drive Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $23,000 Medium Priority30621 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Redwater Drive Black Eagle Drive to North Loop Boulevard Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $59,000 Medium Priority30622 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Kingsford Drive Arden Way to End Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $10,000 Medium Priority30623 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Florin Road Franklin Boulevard to Sunrise Boulevard Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $4,662,000 Medium Priority30624 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) M Street Marysville Boulevard to Oak Lane Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $71,000 Medium Priority30625 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Arnold Avenue James Way to Dudley Boulevard Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $46,000 Medium Priority30626 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Flyway Drive Vought Drive to Madison Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $11,000 Medium Priority30627 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Linda Sue Way Dewey Drive to Madison Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $29,000 Medium Priority30628 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Marshall Avenue Stanley Avenue to Grant Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $24,000 Medium Priority30629 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Marshall Avenue Sutter Avenue to Lincoln Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $24,000 Medium Priority30630 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Poker Lane Don Julio Boulevard to Antelope Road North Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $45,000 Medium Priority30631 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Templeton Drive Rutland Drive to Dewey Drive Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $43,000 Medium Priority30632 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Trajan Drive Greenback Lane to Central Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $32,000 Medium Priority30633 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Del Paso Road Power Line Road to Sacramento C.L. Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $437,000 Medium Priority30634 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Vought Drive Phoenix Avenue to Flyway Drive Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $4,000 Medium Priority30635 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Mira Del Rio Drive End to Paseo Rio Way Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $17,000 Medium Priority30636 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Elwyn Avenue Elverta Road to U Street Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $31,000 Medium Priority30637 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) (McClellan) Patrol Road Dean Street to Magpie Creek Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $88,000 Medium Priority

30638 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Dean Street Winters Street to McClellan Perimeter Rd. Trail Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $12,000 Medium Priority

30639 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Douglas Road Mather Boulevard to Sunrise Boulevard Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $284,000 Medium Priority30640 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Winters Street Dean Street to Sacramento C.L. Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $229,000 Medium Priority30641 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) New Road Winona Way to Orange Grove Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $18,000 Medium Priority30642 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) 10th Street Elkhorn Boulevard to E Street Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $24,000 Medium Priority30643 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) 16th Street Ascot Avenue to Elkhorn Boulevard Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $404,000 Medium Priority30644 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Chestnut Avenue Pershing Avenue to Oak Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $97,000 Medium Priority30645 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Palmerson Drive Elverta Road to Poker Lane Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $126,000 Medium Priority30646 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Paseo Rio Way Mira Del Rio Way to Folsom Boulevard Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $7,000 Medium Priority30647 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) G Street 10th Street to 16th Street Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $36,000 Medium Priority30648 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Isabella Avenue Sunset Avenue to Winding Way Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $12,000 Medium Priority30649 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Lake Natoma Drive Main Avenue to Greenback Lane Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $38,000 Medium Priority30650 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Locust Avenue Walnut Avenue to Manzanita Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $46,000 Medium Priority30651 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Los Rios Drive McClaren Drive to Shelato Way Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $3,000 Medium Priority30652 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Palmyra Drive Madison Avenue to Dory Way Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $16,000 Medium Priority

Page 30 of 59




30653 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Andrea Boulevard Roseville Road to Tupelo Drive Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $70,000 Medium Priority30654 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Greenback Lane Fair Oaks Boulevard to Folsom C.L. Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $1,031,000 Medium Priority30655 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Van Alstine Avenue Fair Oaks Boulevard to California Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $18,000 Medium Priority30656 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) La Serena Drive Hazel Avenue to End Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $30,000 Medium Priority30657 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Walnut Avenue Blue Oak Drive to Pershing Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $10,000 Medium Priority30658 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Wittenham Way Greenback Lane to Woodlake Hills Drive Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $17,000 Medium Priority30659 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Elm Avenue Elm Avenue Trail to Main Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $92,000 Medium Priority30660 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Fulton Avenue SR 51 (Business 80) to Munroe Street Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $1,026,000 Medium Priority30661 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Walnut Avenue Madison Avenue to Oak Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $97,000 Medium Priority30662 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Tallyho Drive Kiefer Boulevard to Kiefer Boulevard Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $55,000 Medium Priority30663 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Shelato Way Los Rios Drive to McClaren Drive Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $24,000 Medium Priority30664 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Mayhew Road Mayhew Road Connection to Elder Creek Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $83,000 Medium Priority30665 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) 14th Street Elkhorn Boulevard to I Street Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $5,000 Medium Priority30666 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Curragh Downs Drive Curragh Downs Trail to Hazel Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $24,000 Medium Priority30667 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) El Modena Avenue Elverta Road to Placer County Line Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $60,000 Medium Priority30668 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Flight Lane Arnold Avenue to New Class I UPRR Crossing Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $3,000 Medium Priority30669 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) I Street 14th Street to 24th Street Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $59,000 Medium Priority30670 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Keema Avenue Walerga Road to Longdale Drive Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $18,000 Medium Priority30671 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Rimwood Drive Madison Avenue to West Camp Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $27,000 Medium Priority30672 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Stevenson Avenue Power Inn Road to Cottonwood Lane Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $48,000 Medium Priority30673 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Orange Grove Avenue Roseville Road to Watt Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $48,000 Medium Priority30674 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Mayhew Road Connection Oxwood Drive to Mayhew Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $14,000 Medium Priority

30675 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Industry DriveIndustry Drive (I‐80) Overcrossing to Orange Grove Ave

Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $4,000 Medium Priority

30676 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Grant Avenue End to Hollister Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $30,000 Medium Priority30677 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Artesia Road Elwyn Avenue to El Modena Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $23,000 Medium Priority30678 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Sand City Drive Antelope Road to Elverta Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $12,000 Medium Priority30679 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Howe Avenue Auburn Boulevard to Fair Oaks Boulevard Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $1,350,000 Medium Priority30680 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Granite Avenue Oak Avenue to Cherry Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $36,000 Medium Priority30681 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Fruitridge Road S. Watt Avenue to Mayhew Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $434,000 Medium Priority30682 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) 32nd Street U Street to Freedom Park Drive Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $93,000 Medium Priority30683 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Dory Way Lake Knoll Lane to Greenridge Way Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $18,000 Medium Priority30684 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Elm Avenue Kenneth Avenue to Elm Avenue Trail Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $14,000 Medium Priority30685 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Jackson Street Myrtle Avenue to Madison Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $24,000 Medium Priority30686 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) New Road Roseville Road to Orange Grove Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $28,000 Medium Priority30687 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Old Ranch Road Citrus Heights C.L. to Kenneth Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $21,000 Medium Priority30688 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) 55th Street Florin Road to 66th Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $12,000 Medium Priority30689 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Fruitridge Road MLK Jr. Boulevard to Sacramento C.L. Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $336,000 Medium Priority30690 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Elwyn Avenue Rio Linda Blvd to Placer County Line Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $245,000 Medium Priority30691 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Mountain Avenue Oak Avenue to Cherry Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $36,000 Medium Priority30692 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Hedge Avenue SR 16 to Florin Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $132,000 Medium Priority30693 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Gibson Ranch Park Road Elverta Road to Unnamed Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $53,000 Medium Priority30694 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Peacekeeper Way Dudley Boulevard to Watt Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $88,000 Medium Priority30695 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Trade Center Drive Sunrise Boulevard to Mercantile Drive Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $25,000 Medium Priority30696 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Indian Hill Court End to Indian Creek Drive Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $7,000 Medium Priority30697 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Antelope Road North Antelope Road to Placer County Line Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $333,000 Medium Priority30698 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) McClaren Drive Kingsford Drive to Shelato Way Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $21,000 Medium Priority30699 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Golden Gate Avenue Granite Avenue to Cardwell Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $38,000 Medium Priority30700 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Phoenix Avenue Kenneth Avenue to Winding Oak Drive Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $66,000 Medium Priority30701 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Folsom Boulevard Sunrise Boulevard to Folsom City Limits Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $27,000 Medium Priority30702 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Excelsior Road Mather Boulevard to Calvine Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $2,175,000 Medium Priority30703 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Tupelo Drive Roseville Road to Citrus Heights C.L. Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $25,000 Medium Priority30704 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) El Verano Avenue Elverta Road to Adair Street Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $36,000 Medium Priority30705 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Cardwell Avenue Oak Avenue to Golden Gate Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $24,000 Medium Priority30706 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) U Street W. 6th Street to Dry Creek Trail Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $960,000 Medium Priority30707 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) W. Elverta Road Rio Linda Boulevard to Garden Hwy Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $3,077,000 Medium Priority30708 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Wachtel Way Old Auburn Road to Oak Avenue Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $53,000 Medium Priority30709 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) 9th Street U Street to Elverta Road Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $31,000 Medium Priority30710 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Cherry Lane Curved Bridge Road to Elkhorn Boulevard Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $27,000 Medium Priority30711 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) E Street 10th Street to 24th Street Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $82,000 Medium Priority30712 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Roseville Road Antelope Road to Roseville C.L. Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $512,000 Medium Priority30713 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) Unnamed Road Track Crossing Trail to Dudley Boulevard Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $3,000 Medium Priority30714 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) 66th Avenue 55th Street to Stockton Boulevard Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $36,000 Medium Priority30715 Sacramento Sacramento County Bike Lanes (Class II) East Parkway Florin Road to Circle Parkway Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan $9,600 Medium Priority

30852 Sacramento Sacramento County Pedestrian Upgrade Southgate: Florin Creek ParkSidewalk, curb, gutter, and drainage construction along Persimmon Avenue for Florin Creek Park (approximately 665 linear ft.)

665 ft TBD

30853 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Sacramento County: Antelope Road South side from Grey Wolf Dr to Holbrook Way 824 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $329,600 Higher Priority

30854 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Sacramento County: Antelope Road South side from Holbrook Way to Black Bear Dr 658 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $263,200 Higher Priority

30855 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Sacramento County: Antelope Road South side from Walerga Rd to Driveway 203 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $81,200 Higher Priority

30856 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Sacramento County: Antelope Road North side from Walerga Rd to Driveway 203 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $81,200 Higher Priority

Page 31 of 59




30857 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Sacramento County: Elverta Road South side from Quiet Knolls Dr to Walerga Rd 1682 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $672,800 Higher Priority

30858 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Sacramento County: Walerga Road West side from Big Cloud Way to Aparartments 594 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $237,600 Higher Priority

30859 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Sacramento County: Walerga Road East side from Segment near Bogart W. to Segment near Garbo W.

200 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $80,000 Higher Priority

30860 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: Alta Arden Expy South side from Richmond St to Watt Ave 814 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $325,600 Higher Priority

30861 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: Arden Way South side from Devonshire Rd to El Nido Way 79 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $31,600 Higher Priority

30862 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: Arden Way South side from Watt Ave to Devonshire Rd 824 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $329,600 Higher Priority

30863 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: Bell St West side from Cottage Way to Woodstock Way 322 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $128,800 Higher Priority

30864 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: Bell St West side from Woodstock Way to Wyda Way 993 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $397,200 Higher Priority30865 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: Eastern Avenue West side from Castec Dr to Alley 169 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $67,600 Higher Priority30866 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: Eastern Avenue East side from Corona Way to La Salle Dr 128 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $51,200 Higher Priority30867 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: Eastern Avenue West side from Corona Way to La Salle Dr 128 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $51,200 Higher Priority30868 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: Eastern Avenue West side from Entrada Rd to Alley 150 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $60,000 Higher Priority30869 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: Eastern Avenue East side from Fair Oaks Blvd to Loazell Ct 358 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $143,200 Higher Priority30870 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: Eastern Avenue West side from La Salle Dr to Corona Way 398 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $159,200 Higher Priority30871 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: Eastern Avenue East side from La Salle Dr to Corona Way 398 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $159,200 Higher Priority30872 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: Eastern Avenue West side from La Salle Dr to Entrada Rd 114 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $45,600 Higher Priority30873 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: Eastern Avenue East side from La Salle Dr to Entrada Rd 114 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $45,600 Higher Priority30874 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: Eastern Avenue East side from Loazell Ct to La Salle Dr 270 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $108,000 Higher Priority30875 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: Eastern Avenue West side from Puente Way to Castec Dr 347 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $138,800 Higher Priority30876 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: Eastern Avenue East side from Puente Way to Castec Dr 347 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $138,800 Higher Priority30877 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: El Camino Avenue North side from Anna Way to Darwin St 268 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $107,200 Higher Priority30878 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: El Camino Avenue South side from Anna Way to Darwin St 268 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $107,200 Higher Priority

30879 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: El Camino Avenue North side from Moretti Way to 127' west to Howe 127 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $50,800 Higher Priority

30880 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: El Camino Avenue North side from Moretti Way to Tamarack Way 285 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $114,000 Higher Priority

30881 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: El Camino Avenue South side from Morse Ave to Morse Ave/Drayton 646 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $258,400 Higher Priority

30882 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: El Camino Avenue South side from St Mathews Dr to Kentfield Dr 296 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $118,400 Higher Priority

30883 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: Fair Oaks Blvd. South side from Drake Cir / Mills Rd to Alley 95 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $38,000 Higher Priority30884 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: Fair Oaks Blvd. North side from Howe Ave to Fair Oaks Blvd 643 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $257,200 Higher Priority30885 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: Fair Oaks Blvd. South side from Howe Ave to Fair Oaks Blvd 643 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $257,200 Higher Priority30886 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: Fair Oaks Blvd. South side from Lake Oak Ct to Pietro Ln 979 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $391,600 Higher Priority30887 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: Fair Oaks Blvd. South side from Pietro Ln to Saverien Dr 428 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $171,200 Higher Priority30888 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: Fulton Avenue West side from Cooper Way to Arden Way 219 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $87,600 Higher Priority30889 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: Fulton Avenue West side from Hurley Way to Marigold Ln 988 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $395,200 Higher Priority30890 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: Fulton Avenue West side from Maison Way to Cooper Way 671 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $268,400 Higher Priority30891 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: Fulton Avenue West side from Marigold Ln to Wittkop Way 330 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $132,000 Higher Priority30892 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: Fulton Avenue West side from Wittkop Way to Maison Way 429 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $171,600 Higher Priority30893 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: Hurley Way South side from Fulton Ave to Rowena Way 858 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $343,200 Higher Priority30894 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: Hurley Way North side from Morse Ave to Rushden Dr 1127 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $450,800 Higher Priority30895 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: Marconi Avenue North side from Lieno Ln to Morse Ave 559 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $223,600 Higher Priority

30896 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: Watt Avenue West side from Arden Creek Rd to Maplewood Ln 565 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $226,000 Higher Priority

30897 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: Watt Avenue West side from Ardendale Ln to Arden Creek Rd 483 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $193,200 Higher Priority

30898 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: Watt Avenue West side from Cottage Way to Ardendale Ln 348 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $139,200 Higher Priority

30899 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: Watt Avenue West side from Maplewood Ln to Alta Arden Expressway


30900 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Dewey Dr East side from Coyle Ave to north 130' 130 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $52,000 Higher Priority30901 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Dewey Dr West side from Coyle Ave to north 130' 130 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $52,000 Higher Priority

30902 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Dewey Dr West side from Northbrook Way to Linda Sue Way 85 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $34,000 Higher Priority

30903 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Dewey Dr East side from Northbrook Way to Linda Sue Way 85 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $34,000 Higher Priority

30904 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Dewey Dr East side from Northbrook Way to south 219' 219 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $87,600 Higher Priority30905 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Dewey Dr West side from Northbrook Way to south 219' 219 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $87,600 Higher Priority30906 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Engle Road North side from Garfield to Timmco Ct 414 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $165,600 Higher Priority30907 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Engle Road South side from Garfield to Timmco Ct 414 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $165,600 Higher Priority

30908 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Engle Road North side from Hallelujah Ct to Fair Oaks Blvd 686 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $274,400 Higher Priority

30909 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Engle Road South side from Hallelujah Ct to Fair Oaks Blvd 686 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $274,400 Higher Priority

30910 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Engle Road North side from Holloway Ln to Vega Ct 375 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $150,000 Higher Priority30911 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Engle Road South side from Holloway Ln to Vega Ct 375 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $150,000 Higher Priority30912 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Engle Road North side from Sareco Ct to Hallelujah Ct 267 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $106,800 Higher Priority30913 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Engle Road South side from Sareco Ct to Hallelujah Ct 267 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $106,800 Higher Priority30914 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Engle Road North side from Timmco Ct to Holloway Ln 413 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $165,200 Higher Priority30915 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Engle Road South side from Timmco Ct to Holloway Ln 413 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $165,200 Higher Priority30916 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Engle Road North side from Vega Ct to Sareco Ct 301 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $120,400 Higher Priority30917 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Engle Road South side from Vega Ct to Sareco Ct 301 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $120,400 Higher Priority

Page 32 of 59




30918 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Fair Oaks Blvd. East side from Ainsley Ct to Homewood Way 193 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $77,200 Higher Priority30919 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Fair Oaks Blvd. West side from Ainsley Ct to Homewood Way 193 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $77,200 Higher Priority30920 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Fair Oaks Blvd. East side from Arden Way to Walnut Ave 453 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $181,200 Higher Priority30921 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Fair Oaks Blvd. West side from Arden Way to Walnut Ave 454 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $181,600 Higher Priority30922 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Fair Oaks Blvd. East side from Cenacle Ln to Marchita Way 498 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $199,200 Higher Priority30923 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Fair Oaks Blvd. West side from Cenacle Ln to Marchita Way 498 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $199,200 Higher Priority30924 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Fair Oaks Blvd. North side from Chaplain Ln to Sumner Ln 994 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $397,600 Higher Priority30925 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Fair Oaks Blvd. South side from Chaplain Ln to Sumner Ln 994 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $397,600 Higher Priority

30926 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Fair Oaks Blvd. North side from Claremont Rd to Van Ufford Ln 228 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $91,200 Higher Priority

30927 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Fair Oaks Blvd. South side from Claremont Rd to Van Ufford Ln 228 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $91,200 Higher Priority

30928 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Fair Oaks Blvd. South side from Day Dr to Menlo Ave 295 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $118,000 Higher Priority30929 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Fair Oaks Blvd. South side from Del Dayo Dr to Mipaty Ln 252 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $100,800 Higher Priority30930 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Fair Oaks Blvd. South side from Elsdon Cir to Paloma Ave 412 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $164,800 Higher Priority30931 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Fair Oaks Blvd. East side from Fairchild Dr to Westminster Ct 348 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $139,200 Higher Priority30932 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Fair Oaks Blvd. West side from Fairchild Dr to Westminster Ct 348 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $139,200 Higher Priority30933 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Fair Oaks Blvd. South side from Fairwood Way to Dell Rd 493 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $197,200 Higher Priority

30934 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Fair Oaks Blvd. East side from Frontier Way to Wedgewood Ave 129 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $51,600 Higher Priority

30935 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Fair Oaks Blvd. West side from Frontier Way to Wedgewood Ave 130 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $52,000 Higher Priority

30936 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Fair Oaks Blvd. West side from Garfield Ave to Marywood Wy 10 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $4,000 Higher Priority30937 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Fair Oaks Blvd. East side from Garfield Ave to Marywood Wy 10 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $4,000 Higher Priority30938 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Fair Oaks Blvd. North side from Genesee Ct to Jacob Ln 293 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $117,200 Higher Priority30939 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Fair Oaks Blvd. East side from Gunn Rd to Cenacle Ln 422 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $168,800 Higher Priority30940 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Fair Oaks Blvd. West side from Gunn Rd to Cenacle Ln 422 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $168,800 Higher Priority

30941 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Fair Oaks Blvd. East side from Homewood Way to Garfield Ave 498 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $199,200 Higher Priority

30942 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Fair Oaks Blvd. West side from Homewood Way to Garfield Ave 498 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $199,200 Higher Priority

30943 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Fair Oaks Blvd. South side from Jacob Ln to Philomene Ct 271 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $108,400 Higher Priority30944 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Fair Oaks Blvd. West side from Marchita Way to Ainsley Ct 328 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $131,200 Higher Priority30945 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Fair Oaks Blvd. West side from Marchita Way to Ainsley Ct 328 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $131,200 Higher Priority30946 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Fair Oaks Blvd. West side from Marione Dr to Fairchild Dr 258 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $103,200 Higher Priority30947 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Fair Oaks Blvd. East side from Marione Dr to Fairchild Dr 258 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $103,200 Higher Priority30948 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Fair Oaks Blvd. East side from Marione Dr to Gunn Rd 748 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $299,200 Higher Priority30949 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Fair Oaks Blvd. West side from Marione Dr to Gunn Rd 748 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $299,200 Higher Priority30950 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Fair Oaks Blvd. West side from Marywood Ct to Seabler Pl 296 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $118,400 Higher Priority30951 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Fair Oaks Blvd. West side from Marywood Ct to Seabler Pl 296 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $118,400 Higher Priority30952 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Fair Oaks Blvd. South side from Mipaty Ln to Day Dr 316 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $126,400 Higher Priority30953 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Fair Oaks Blvd. North side from Mission Ave to Genesee Ct 326 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $130,400 Higher Priority30954 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Fair Oaks Blvd. East side from Oak Ave to Twin Gardens Rd 166 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $66,400 Higher Priority30955 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Fair Oaks Blvd. West side from Oak Ave to Twin Gardens Rd 166 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $66,400 Higher Priority30956 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Fair Oaks Blvd. South side from Paloma Ave to Arden Way 566 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $226,400 Higher Priority30957 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Fair Oaks Blvd. South side from Philomene Ct to Del Dayo Dr 306 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $122,400 Higher Priority

30958 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Fair Oaks Blvd. North side from Seabler Pl to Shefield Dr/ Elena Ln 292 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $116,800 Higher Priority

30959 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Fair Oaks Blvd. South side from Seabler Pl to Shefield Dr/ Elena Ln 292 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $116,800 Higher Priority

30960 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Fair Oaks Blvd. North side from Shefield Dr/ Elena Ln to Claremont R 297 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $118,800 Higher Priority

30961 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Fair Oaks Blvd. South side from Shefield Dr/ Elena Ln to Claremont Rd


30962 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Fair Oaks Blvd. East side from Twin Gardens Rd to Frontier Way 563 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $225,200 Higher Priority

30963 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Fair Oaks Blvd. West side from Twin Gardens Rd to Frontier Way 563 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $225,200 Higher Priority

30964 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Fair Oaks Blvd. South side from Van Ufford Ln to Oak Ave 550 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $220,000 Higher Priority30965 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Fair Oaks Blvd. North side from Van Ufford Ln to Oak Ave 550 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $220,000 Higher Priority30966 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Fair Oaks Blvd. East side from Walnut Ave to Marione Dr 298 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $119,200 Higher Priority30967 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Fair Oaks Blvd. West side from Walnut Ave to Marione Dr 298 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $119,200 Higher Priority

30968 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Fair Oaks Blvd. East side from Wedgewood Ave to Van Alstine Ave 499 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $199,600 Higher Priority

30969 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Fair Oaks Blvd. West side from Wedgewood Ave to Van Alstine Ave 499 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $199,600 Higher Priority

30970 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Fair Oaks Blvd. East side from Westminster Ct to Marione Dr 66 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $26,400 Higher Priority30971 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Fair Oaks Blvd. West side from Westminster Ct to Marione Dr 66 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $26,400 Higher Priority30972 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Mission Avenue East side from El Camino Ave to Melvin Dr 705 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $282,000 Higher Priority

30973 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Mission Avenue East side from Hardcastle Ln to Nottingham Cir 119 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $47,600 Higher Priority

30974 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Mission Avenue East side from Knapp Wy to Laurelwood Wy 211 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $84,400 Higher Priority30975 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Mission Avenue East side from Laurelwood Wy to Cottage Wy 480 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $192,000 Higher Priority30976 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Mission Avenue East side from Melvin Dr to Oxbow Dr 298 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $119,200 Higher Priority30977 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Mission Avenue East side from Nelroy Wy to Nottingham Cir 184 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $73,600 Higher Priority

30978 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Mission Avenue East side from Nottingham Cir to Hardcastle Ln 212 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $84,800 Higher Priority

Page 33 of 59




30979 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Mission Avenue East side from Nottingham Cir to Knapp Wy 120 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $48,000 Higher Priority30980 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Mission Avenue East side from Oxbow Dr to Nelroy Wy 203 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $81,200 Higher Priority30981 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: San Juan Avenue East side from Ash Rd to Winding Wy 384 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $153,600 Higher Priority30982 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: San Juan Avenue West side from Ash Rd to Winding Wy 384 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $153,600 Higher Priority30983 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Winding Way North side from Alley to San Juan Ave 323 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $129,200 Higher Priority30984 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Winding Way South side from Barrett Rd to Meyer Way 606 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $242,400 Higher Priority30985 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Winding Way North side from Charleston Dr to Dewey Dr 151 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $60,400 Higher Priority30986 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Winding Way South side from Charleston Dr to Dewey Dr 151 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $60,400 Higher Priority30987 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Winding Way South side from Dewey Dr to Rustic Rd 1187 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $474,800 Higher Priority30988 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Winding Way North side from Isabella Ave to Alley 310 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $124,000 Higher Priority30989 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Winding Way South side from Isabella Ave to Alley 310 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $124,000 Higher Priority30990 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Winding Way North side from Johnson Dr to Solano Way 397 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $158,800 Higher Priority30991 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Winding Way South side from Johnson Dr to Solano Way 397 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $158,800 Higher Priority30992 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Winding Way North side from Meyer Way to Charleston Dr 525 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $210,000 Higher Priority30993 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Winding Way South side from Meyer Way to Charleston Dr 525 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $210,000 Higher Priority30994 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Winding Way North side from Olivegate Dr to Isabella Ave 34 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $13,600 Higher Priority30995 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Winding Way South side from Olivegate Dr to Isabella Ave 34 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $13,600 Higher Priority30996 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Winding Way South side from Rustic Rd to Stollwood Dr 1287 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $514,800 Higher Priority30997 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Winding Way North side from Solano Way to Olivegate Dr 281 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $112,400 Higher Priority30998 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Winding Way South side from Solano Way to Olivegate Dr 281 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $112,400 Higher Priority30999 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Winding Way North side from Solano Way to Solano Way 43 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $17,200 Higher Priority31000 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Winding Way South side from Solano Way to Solano Way 43 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $17,200 Higher Priority31001 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Winding Way South side from Stollwood Dr to Zelinda Dr 15 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $6,000 Higher Priority

31002 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Winding Way North side from Windmill Way to Hackberry Ln 278 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $111,200 Higher Priority

31003 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Winding Way South side from Windmill Way to Hackberry Ln 278 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $111,200 Higher Priority

31004 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Winding Way North side from Windmill Way to Manzanita Ave 1077 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $430,800 Higher Priority

31005 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Winding Way South side from Windmill Way to Manzanita Ave 1077 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $430,800 Higher Priority

31006 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Winding Way North side from Zelinda Dr to Johnson Dr 776 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $310,400 Higher Priority31007 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Winding Way South side from Zelinda Dr to Johnson Dr 776 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $310,400 Higher Priority31008 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Cosumnes: Jackson Road South side from Kiefer to Latrobe Rd 2576 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $1,030,400 Higher Priority31009 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Cosumnes: Jackson Road North side from Kiefer to Latrobe Rd 2576 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $1,030,400 Higher Priority

31010 Sacramento Sacramento County SidewalkDelta/Franklin/Laguna: Hood‐Franklin Road

North side from I‐5 to Franklin Blvd 6378 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $2,551,200 Higher Priority

31011 Sacramento Sacramento County SidewalkDelta/Franklin/Laguna: Eschinger Road

North side from Carroll Rd to W Stockton Blvd 18281 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $7,312,400 Higher Priority


North side from W Stockton Blvd to USHY 99 247 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $98,800 Higher Priority


South side from W Stockton Blvd to USHY 99 247 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $98,800 Higher Priority

31014 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Fair Oaks: Fair Oaks Blvd. West side from Archer Ave to Monte Park Ave 169 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $67,600 Higher Priority31015 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Fair Oaks: Fair Oaks Blvd. East side from McMillan Dr to Oahu Dr 319 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $127,600 Higher Priority31016 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Fair Oaks: Fair Oaks Blvd. West side from McMillan Dr to Oahu Dr 319 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $127,600 Higher Priority31017 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Fair Oaks: Fair Oaks Blvd. East side from Oahu Dr to Kalua Dr 319 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $127,600 Higher Priority31018 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Fair Oaks: Fair Oaks Blvd. West side from Oahu Dr to Kalua Dr 319 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $127,600 Higher Priority31019 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Fair Oaks: Fair Oaks Blvd. West side from Shangrila Dr to Archer Ave 116 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $46,400 Higher Priority31020 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Fair Oaks: Fair Oaks Blvd. East side from Shangrila Dr to Archer Ave 116 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $46,400 Higher Priority

31021 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Fair Oaks: Kenneth Avenue East side from Gunner Way to Rolling Creek Way 544 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $217,600 Higher Priority

31022 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Fair Oaks: Kenneth Avenue West side from Gunner Way to Rolling Creek Way 544 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $217,600 Higher Priority

31023 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Fair Oaks: Kenneth Avenue West side from Jomarr Ln to Phoenix Ave 656 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $262,400 Higher Priority31024 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Fair Oaks: Kenneth Avenue East side from Jomarr Ln to Phoenix Ave 656 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $262,400 Higher Priority

31025 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Fair Oaks: Kenneth Avenue East side from Rolling Creek Way to Kenneth Creek Ln


31026 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Fair Oaks: Kenneth Avenue West side from Sunset Ave to Gunner Way 1252 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $500,800 Higher Priority31027 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Fair Oaks: Kenneth Avenue East side from Sunset Ave to Gunner Way 1252 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $500,800 Higher Priority31028 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Fair Oaks: Madison Avenue South side from San Juan Ave to Highview Ln 968 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $387,200 Higher Priority31029 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Fair Oaks: Madison Avenue North side from Shire Ct to Waikiki Dr 139 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $55,600 Higher Priority31030 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Fair Oaks: Madison Avenue South side from Shire Ct to Waikiki Dr 139 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $55,600 Higher Priority31031 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Fair Oaks: Madison Avenue East side from Waikiki Dr to Greenbreier Way 120 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $48,000 Higher Priority31032 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Fair Oaks: Madison Avenue East side from Waikiki Dr to Greenbreier Way 120 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $48,000 Higher Priority

31033 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Fair Oaks: Madsion Avenue East side from Norway Dr to Norway Dr (West) 127 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $50,800 Higher Priority

31034 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Fair Oaks: San Juan Avenue East side from Ash Rd to Walnut Rd 462 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $184,800 Higher Priority31035 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Fair Oaks: San Juan Avenue East side from Walnut Rd to Midiron Dr 292 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $116,800 Higher Priority31036 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Fair Oaks: San Juan Avenue East side from Walnut Rd to Walnut Rd 27 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $10,800 Higher Priority31037 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Fair Oaks: San Juan Avenue East side from Winding Way to Ash Rd 384 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $153,600 Higher Priority

31038 Sacramento Sacramento County SidewalkNorth Highlands/Foothill Farms: Antelope Road

North side from Nott Ln to Daly Ave 1378 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $551,200 Higher Priority

31039 Sacramento Sacramento County SidewalkNorth Highlands/Foothill Farms: Elkhorn Blvd.

West side from I ‐ 80 to Diablo Dr 1193 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $477,200 Higher Priority

Page 34 of 59




31040 Sacramento Sacramento County SidewalkNorth Highlands/Foothill Farms: Roseville Road

East side from Watt Ave to Changes to Madison Ave 605 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $242,000 Higher Priority

31041 Sacramento Sacramento County SidewalkNorth Highlands/Foothill Farms: Roseville Road

West side from Watt Ave to Changes to Madison Ave


31042 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Orangevale: Hazel Avenue East side from Elm Lane to Central Av 2636 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $1,054,400 Higher Priority31043 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Orangevale: Hazel Avenue West side from Oak Ave to Park Entrance 741 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $296,400 Higher Priority31044 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Orangevale: Hazel Avenue East side from Oak Ave to Park Entrance 741 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $296,400 Higher Priority31045 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Rio Linda/Elverta: L St North side from 6th Ave to 7th St 319 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $127,600 Higher Priority31046 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Rio Linda/Elverta: L St North side from 6th St to 6th Ave 335 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $134,000 Higher Priority31047 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Rio Linda/Elverta: Rio Linda Blvd. West side from E St to G St 1308 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $523,200 Higher Priority31048 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Rio Linda/Elverta: Rio Linda Blvd. West side from G St to Elkhorn Blvd 1328 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $531,200 Higher Priority31049 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Rio Linda/Elverta: Rio Linda Blvd. West side from Marysville Blvd to E St 732 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $292,800 Higher Priority31050 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: 47th Avenue South side from 45th to Welty Way 239 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $95,600 Higher Priority31051 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: 47th Avenue South side from Laurine Way to Leola Way 246 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $98,400 Higher Priority31052 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: 47th Avenue South side from Welty Way to Laurine Way 247 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $98,800 Higher Priority

31053 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: Cottonwood Ln East side from Elsie Ave to Gainswood Ln 518 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $207,200 Higher Priority

31054 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: E Stockton Blvd. West side from Stevenson Ave to Power Inn Rd 3090 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $1,236,000 Higher Priority

31055 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: E Stockton Blvd. West side from Stevenson Ave to Power Inn Rd 751 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $300,400 Higher Priority

31056 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: Elsie Avenue North side from Robinette Rd to La Fiesta Way 923 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $369,200 Higher Priority

31057 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: Elsie Avenue South side from Robinette Rd to La Fiesta Way 923 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $369,200 Higher Priority

31058 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: French Road West side from Sun Florin Dr to Elaine Dr 692 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $276,800 Higher Priority

31059 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: Gerber Road North side from Palmer House Dr to Power Inn Rd 1306 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $522,400 Higher Priority

31060 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: Gerber Road South side from Power Inn Rd to Fernridge Dr 986 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $394,400 Higher Priority

31061 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: Power Inn Road East side from Blackhawk Dr to Loucreta Dr 326 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $130,400 Higher Priority

31062 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: Power Inn Road East side from Elsie Ave to Lenhart Rd 1983 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $793,200 Higher Priority

31063 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: Power Inn Road West side from Elsie Ave to Lenhart Rd 1983 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $793,200 Higher Priority

31064 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: Power Inn Road West side from Florin Rd to Blackhawk Dr 1152 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $460,800 Higher Priority

31065 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: Power Inn Road East side from Florin Rd to Blackhawk Dr 1152 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $460,800 Higher Priority

31066 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: Power Inn Road East side from Gerber Rd to Trail Woods Dr 930 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $372,000 Higher Priority

31067 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: Power Inn Road East side from Hemingway Dr to Elsie Ave 525 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $210,000 Higher Priority

31068 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: Power Inn Road West side from Lenhart Rd to Speilberg Way 534 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $213,600 Higher Priority

31069 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: Power Inn Road West side from Llanovista to Calvine Rd 604 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $241,600 Higher Priority

31070 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: Power Inn Road West side from Loucreta Dr to 68th Ave 694 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $277,600 Higher Priority

31071 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: Power Inn Road East side from McFadden Dr to Gerber Rd 665 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $266,000 Higher Priority

31072 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: Power Inn Road East side from Skywoods Way to Hemingway Dr 628 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $251,200 Higher Priority

31073 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: Stevenson Avenue North side from Beachmont Way to Lexus Way 449 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $179,600 Higher Priority

31074 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: Stevenson Avenue North side from Elegante Way to Spearberry Way 280 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $112,000 Higher Priority

31075 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: Stevenson Avenue South side from Elegante Way to Spearberry Way 280 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $112,000 Higher Priority

31076 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: Stevenson Avenue North side from Goshen Way to Beachmont Way 696 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $278,400 Higher Priority

31077 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: Stevenson Avenue North side from Parkgate Way to Elegante Way 247 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $98,800 Higher Priority

31078 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: Stevenson Avenue North side from Spearberry Way to Cottonwood Ln 526 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $210,400 Higher Priority

31079 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: Stevenson Avenue South side from Spearberry Way to Cottonwood Ln 526 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $210,400 Higher Priority

31080 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: Stevenson Avenue North side from Spengler Dr to Parkgate Way 257 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $102,800 Higher Priority

31081 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: Stevenson Avenue North side from Springarden Way to Golden Meadow Dr


31082 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: Stockton Blvd. West side from Chandler Dr to Orange Ave 1407 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $562,800 Higher Priority31083 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: Stockton Blvd. East side from Gerber Rd to Massie Ct 1070 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $428,000 Higher Priority31084 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: Stockton Blvd. West side from Gerber Rd to Massie Ct 1070 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $428,000 Higher Priority

31085 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: Stockton Blvd. East side from Patterson Way to 236' northwest 236 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $94,400 Higher Priority

Page 35 of 59




31086 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: Stockton Blvd. East side from Patterson Way to 284' southeast 284 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $113,600 Higher Priority

31087 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: Stockton Blvd. East side from Segment between to Patterson Way & 197 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $78,800 Higher Priority

31088 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: Stockton Blvd. East side from Segment between to Patterson Way & 65th St


31089 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: Stockton Blvd. East side from Walter Ave to Whitewillow Dr 692 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $276,800 Higher Priority31090 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: Stockton Blvd. West side from Walter Ave to Whitewillow Dr 692 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $276,800 Higher Priority31091 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: Stockton Blvd. West side from Whitewillow Dr to Stacy Ave 163 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $65,200 Higher Priority31092 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Vineyard: Vineyard Road East side from Gerber Rd to Mission Hills Dr 2768 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $1,107,200 Higher Priority31210 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: Alta Arden Expy Both sides from Bell Street to Watt Ave 8,200 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $14,000,000 Higher Priority

31211 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: American River Drive Both sides from Mering Ct. to Wyndgate Rd 2,600 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $6,000,000 Higher Priority

31212 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: Archer Avenue Both sides from Plumeria Ave to Fair Oaks Blvd 400 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $2,000,000 Higher Priority

31213 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: Arden Way Both sides from Hesket Way to El Nido Way 6800 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $12,000,000 Higher Priority31214 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: Becerra Way East side, from JoAnn Dr to 200' south 200 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $400,000 Higher Priority31215 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: Crondall Dr Both sides from Estates Dr to northeast 1,300' 1,300 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $5,000,000 Higher Priority31216 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: El Camino Avenue Both Sides from Ethan Way to Fair Oaks Blvd 26,000 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $40,000,000 Higher Priority

31217 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: Fair Oaks Blvd. Both sides from El Camino Ave to Marshall Ave 15,200 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $21,000,000 Higher Priority

31218 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: Fair Oaks Blvd. Both sides from San Lucas Way to County Line near Howe Ave

9,400 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $15,000,000 Higher Priority

31219 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: Fair Oaks Blvd. Both sides from El Camino Ave to Manzanita Ave 10,000 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $18,000,000 Higher Priority

31220 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: Fair Oaks Blvd. Both sides from Manzanita to Marshall Ave 5,300 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $12,000,000 Higher Priority31221 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: Fulton Avenue Both sides Auburn Blvd and Arden Way 12,500 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $19,000,000 Higher Priority31222 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: Fulton Avenue Both sides from Fair Oaks Blvd to Sierra Blvd 1,800 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $7,000,000 Higher Priority

31223 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: Howe Ave East & West sides from Cottage Way to Marconi Ave 5,300 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $9,000,000 Higher Priority

31224 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: Howe Ave East & West sides from Spanos Ct to Fair Oaks Blvd 1,600 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $4,000,000 Higher Priority

31225 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: Manzanita Ave Both sides from Fair Oaks Blvd to Winding Way 4,800 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $10,000,000 Higher Priority

31226 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: Morse Ave Both sides from Cottage Way to Maison Way 3,600 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $10,000,000 Higher Priority31227 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: Munroe St Both sides ffrom Fulton Ave to Fair Oaks Blvd 1,200 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $5,000,000 Higher Priority31228 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: North River Way Both sides from Ashton Dr to northeast 900' 900 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $4,000,000 Higher Priority

Page 36 of 59




31229 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: Pasadena Ave Both sides from Orange Grove Ave to Arcade Creek 1,900 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $7,000,000 Higher Priority

31230 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: Pope Ave Both sides Watt Ave to Edison Ave (extended) 6,600 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $15,000,000 Higher Priority

31231 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: Walnut Avenue East side, from Engle Road to 200' north 200 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $800,000 Higher Priority31232 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: Watt Avenue Both sides Auburn Blvd and Arden Way 15500 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $25,000,000 Higher Priority

31233 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Arden Arcade: Watt Avenue Both sides from San Lucas Way to the American River Bridge


31234 Sacramento Sacramento County SidewalkCarmichael: American River Drive / McClaren Dr

Both sides, from Jacob Lane to Sand Bar Circle 2,300 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $2,000,000 Higher Priority

31235 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Arden Way South Side, from El Nido Way to 200' west 200 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $800,500 Higher Priority

31236 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Auburn BlvdSoutherly side from Howe Ave north‐east to Winding Way


31237 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Auburn BlvdBoth sides county line near Kitty Lane , northeast to Manzanita Ave


31238 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Bridge St Both sides from Fair Oaks Blvd and Grand Ave 900 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $2,000,000 Higher Priority31239 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Butano Dr Both sides from El Camino Dr to Cottage Way 5000 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $7,000,000 Higher Priority31240 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Cottage Way Both sides from Cortez Lane to Weldon way 2,200 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $5,000,000 Higher Priority

31241 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Crondall DrBoth sides from Estates Dr north‐east to Cul‐de‐sac (near Exeter St)


31242 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Cypress Ave Both Sides George to Manzanita Ave 1,800 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $5,000,000 Higher Priority31243 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: El Camino Way Both sides Winsford Lane to Carmichael Way 1,200 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $4,000,000 Higher Priority31244 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: El Camino Way Both sidesfrom Ethan Way to Butano Dr 10,500 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $19,000,000 Higher Priority

31245 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: El Camino Way Both sides from Winsford Ln to Carmichael Wy 1,300 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $4,000,000 Higher Priority

31246 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Freedom Park Dr Both sides from 34th St to Watt Ave 1,400 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $4,000,000 Higher Priority31247 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Garfield Ave Both sides from Leader Ave to White Fir Way 1,900 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $6,000,000 Higher Priority

31248 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Locust Ave Both sides from Younger Way to Manzanita Ave 2,000 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $6,000,000 Higher Priority

31249 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Madison Ave Both sides from Harrison Street to Hemlock St 8,200 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $17,000,000 Higher Priority31250 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Manzanita Ave Both sides from Bourbon Dr to Fair Oaks Blvd 6,500 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $15,000,000 Higher Priority

31251 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Marconi Ave Both sides from Garfield Blvd to Fair Oaks Blvd 2,600 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $6,000,000 Higher Priority

31252 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Marconi Ave Both sides from Wright St to Corabel Ln 2,800 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $6,000,000 Higher Priority31253 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Orange Grove Ave Both sides from Roseville Rd to Palomino Ln 6,500 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $12,000,000 Higher Priority31254 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Orange Grove Ave Both sides from Creek Rd to Sycamore Ave 3,700 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $8,000,000 Higher Priority31255 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Palm Dr Both sides from Fair Oaks Blvd to Panama Ave 700 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $3,000,000 Higher Priority

31256 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Plumeria AveBoth sides from From Fair Oaks Blvd to west end of Plumeria

600 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $3,000,000 Higher Priority

31257 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Roseville Rd Both sides from Orange Grove Ave to Madison Ave 8,400 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $17,000,000 Higher Priority

31258 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Sacramento St Both sides from Watkins Dr to Fair Oaks Blvd 1,200 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $5,000,000 Higher Priority31259 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Shangrilla Dr Both siodes from Fair Oaks Blvd to Dietz Way 1,700 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $7,000,000 Higher Priority

31260 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Sunrise Blvd Both sides from Fair Oaks Blvd to Winding Way 2,000 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $9,000,000 Higher Priority

31261 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Sunset Ave Both sides from Livoti Ave to Tommar Dr 1,400 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $6,000,000 Higher Priority31262 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Sutter Ave Both sides from Horton Ln to California Ave 3,400 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $9,000,000 Higher Priority31263 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Watt Avenue East side, from El Ricon Way to 200' north 200 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $825,000 Higher Priority31264 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Whitney Ave South side, from Watt Ave to Eastern Ave 5000 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $4,000,000 Higher Priority

31265 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Winding Way Both sides from Hackberry Ln to Mary Lynn Lane 2,200 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $8,000,000 Higher Priority

31266 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Carmichael: Winding Way Both sides from Sunrise Blvd to Fair Oaks Blvd 2,300 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $8,000,000 Higher Priority31267 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Cosumnes: Roosevelt Ave Both sides from 44th St to Stockton Bllvd 2,600 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $4,000,000 Higher Priority31268 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Cosumnes: Southwest Ave Both sides from Nina Way to Stockton Blvd 1,400 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $4,000,000 Higher Priority

31269 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Cosumnes: Stockton BlvdBoth sides from Southwest Ave to County line near MC Mahon Dr


31270 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Cosumnes: Stockton BlvdBoth sides from Elsie Ave north to County line near Patterson Way


31271 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Cosumnes: Stockton Blvd Westerly side from 14th Ave to 21st Ave 2900 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $4,000,000 Higher Priority

31272 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Fair Oaks: Fair Oaks Blvd. Both Sides from Vinegrove Lane to Sunrise Blvd 12,000 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $21,000,000 Higher Priority

31273 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Fair Oaks: Madison AveBoth sides from Almaden Way to 1/8 mile east of Fair Oaks Blvd


31274 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Fair Oaks: Madison Ave Both sides from Walnut Ave to Main Ave 1,600 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $5,000,000 Higher Priority

31275 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Fair Oaks: Main AveBoth sides from Madison Ave to 1/8 mile north of Orangevale Ave


31276 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Fair Oaks: Old Winding Way Both sides from Winding Way to Fair Oaks Blvd 1,500 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $5,000,000 Higher Priority

31277 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Fair Oaks: Watkins Dr Both sides from Fair Oaks Blvd to Sacramento St 1,000 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $5,000,000 Higher Priority

31278 Sacramento Sacramento County SidewalkNorth Highlands/Foothill Farms: Elkhorn Blvd.

Both sides from 34th St to Stoneman Dr 3800 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $7,000,000 Higher Priority

31279 Sacramento Sacramento County SidewalkNorth Highlands/Foothill Farms: M Street

Both sides from Rio Linda Blvd to 8th St 2,700 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $7,000,000 Higher Priority

Page 37 of 59




31280 Sacramento Sacramento County SidewalkNorth Highlands/Foothill Farms: Rio Linda Blvd

Both sides from Elkhorn Blvd to M St 2,800 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $7,000,000 Higher Priority

31281 Sacramento Sacramento County SidewalkNorth Highlands/Foothill Farms: Watt Ave

Both sides from Antelope Rd/U St to Roseville Rd 17,500 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $50,000,000 Higher Priority

31282 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Orangevale: Fair Oaks Blvd Both sides from Sun Tree Lane to Woodlake Hills Dr 2,700 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $6,000,000 Higher Priority

31283 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Orangevale: Greenback LaneFair Oaks Blvd to Folsom City Limits (east of Main St)


31284 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Orangevale: Hazel Avenue Both sides from Fortuna Way to Cerezo Dr 1,800 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $5,000,000 Higher Priority31285 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk Orangevale: Old Auburn Road From Wachtel Way to Placer County Line 1,100 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $2,000,000 Higher Priority

31286 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: 47th Avenue Both sidesfrom Franklin Blvd to Martin Luther King Blvd

700 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $3,000,000 Higher Priority

31287 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: 47th Avenue Both sides from Highway 99 east to City of Sacramento limits


31288 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: 48th StreetBoth sides from Yosemite Ave south to Sacramento City Limits


31289 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: 65th St ExpwyBoth sides from Florin Rd north to County limts near 53rd Ave


31290 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: Calvine Rd Both sides Hwy 99 to Short Rd 6,000 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $10,000,000 Higher Priority31291 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: Elsie Ave Both Sides Stockton Blvd to Iona Wy 4,000 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $8,000,000 Higher Priority31292 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: Florin Rd Both sides Franklin Blvd to Florin Perkins 20,000 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $19,000,000 Higher Priority

31293 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: Folsom BlvdBoth sides (except City of Rancho Cordova) starting 1,500' west of Watt Ave to City of Ranco Cordova near Bradshaw Rd /Paseo Rio Wy


31294 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: Folsom BlvdBoth sides (Except City off R.C.) From Sunrise Ave east to City of Folsom near Aerojet Rd


31295 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: Franklin Blvd Both sides from County line (near 41st Ave) to Florin 8500 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $12,000,000 Higher Priority31296 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: Gerber Road Both Sides Stockton Blvd to Fernridge Dr 4,900 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $8,000,000 Higher Priority

31297 Sacramento Sacramento County SidewalkSouth Sacramento: Martin Luther King Jr

Both sides from 35th Ave to 47th ave 4,300 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $8,000,000 Higher Priority

31298 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: Power Inn Rd Both sides from Elsie Ave to Calvine Rd 7,200 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $12,000,000 Higher Priority31299 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: Power Inn Rd Both sides from Junipero St to Loucreta Dr 4200 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $8,000,000 Higher Priority

31300 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: Salmon Falls DriveSouth Side, 150' segment starting 400' west of Waterton Way, Curb ramps 650' west on Salmon Falls Dr

150 Sacramento County ADA Transition Plan $800,000 Higher Priority

31301 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: Stockton Blvd. Both sides from Power Inn north to County limits near Patterson Way


31302 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: Stockton Blvd. Westerly side from 14th Ave to Baker Ave 2,900 Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan $7,000,000 Higher Priority

31303 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk South Sacramento: Stockton Blvd. Westerly side from County line near Young St to County Line near McMahon Dr


31304 Sacramento Sacramento County Sidewalk & Intersection South Sacramento: Fruitridge RdBoth sides (except city of Sac.) Franklin Blvd to Stockton Blvd


Page 38 of 59

Q ST

GARDEN HWY

W ELVERTA RD

I ST

OLD RIVER RD

RIO

LINDA

BLV

D

E ST

DEL PASO RD

POWE

R LIN

E RD

SAN JUAN RD

ELVERTA RD

W ELKHORN BLVD

BELL AVE

DRY C

REEK

RD

TRUX

EL R

D

U ST

16TH

ST

EL CAMINO AVE

ELKHORN BLVD

W 2N

D ST

20TH

ST

BELL

ST

24TH

ST

DEL PASO BLVDME TRO PKY

W EL CAMINO AVE

C ST

ROSEVILL

E RD

G ST

NORT

HGAT

E BL

VD

M ST

GRAND AVE

EL C

ENTR

O RD

ARDEN WAY

E COMMERCE WAY

WATT

AVE

FULT

ON AV

E

NORW

OOD

AVE

SOUTH AVE

EDISON AVE

NORTH AVE

HOW

E AVE

ARENA BLVD

RALE

Y BLV

D

AUBURN BLVD

MARCONI AVE

DUCKHORN DR

NATO

MAS

BLVD

N PARK DR

COTTAGE WAY

MARYSV

ILLE B

LVD

MAIN AVE

ALTA ARDEN EXPY

SORE

NTO

RD

N MARKET BLVD

W Q ST

W U ST

POPE AVE

W E ST

28TH

ST

W M ST

N FREE WAY BLVD

AZEVEDO DR

FRONT ST

ETHA

N WA

Y

GATE

WAY P

ARK

BLVD

FORD RD

FEE D R

PFE RD

W RIVER DR

GATEWAY OAKS DR

WINT

ERS

ST

4TH

ST

ORCHARD LN

MEISTER WAY

NEW MARKET DR

N BEND DR

BRIDGECROSS DR

ELEANOR AVE

W 6T

H ST

LEISURE LNCARRIE ST

MAYBROOK DR

HARV

ARD S

T

WRIG

HT ST

ASTO

RIA S

T

RAFAEL DR

MARNICE RD

24TH

ST

I ST

ORCHARD LN

16TH

ST

RIO LINDA BLVD

U ST

AUBURN BLVD

RIO LINDA BLVD

E ST

MAIN AVE

28TH

ST

Sacramento County:Northwest


! SchoolsCities


WATT

AVE

MADISON AVE

FOLSOM BLVD

SUNR

ISE B

LVD

AUBU

RN B

LVD

FAIR OAKS BLVD

GREENBACK LN

WHITE ROCK RD

ROSEVILL

E RD

MAIN

AVE

COLOMA RD

WALE

RGA R

D

RI L EY ST

ARDEN WAY

KENN

ETH

AVE

ELM AVE

MARCONI AVE

WHITNEY AVE

SAN

JUAN

AVE

CENTRAL AVE

DON JULIO BLV

D

EL CAMINO AVE

GARF

IELD

AVE

EAST

ERN

AVE

ENGLE RD

ELKHORN BLVD

MISS

ION

AVE

ELVERTA RD

DEW

EY D

R

PRAI

RIE C

ITY R

D

IRON POINT RD

BLU E RAVINE RD

HAZE

L AVE

PERSHING AVE

ROBERTSON AVE

EDISON AVE

ALMO

ND AV

E

DIABL O DR

FILBE

RT AV

E

WALN

UT AV

E

MANZ

ANITA

AVE

HICK

ORY A

VE

I ST

NORTH AVE

GUNN

RD

NORR

IS AV

E

PECA

N AV

EZINFANDEL D R

CHES

TNUT

AVE

HILLS DALE

BLVD

VAN

MARE

N LN

E BIDWELL ST

SIBLEY ST

GLENN D

R

NATOMA ST

U ST

GOLD COU NTRY BLVD

N LOOP BLVD

Q ST

CYPRESS AVE

LICHE N DR

TUPEL O D RLARCHMONT DR

SYLV

AN R

D

A ST

FOLS

OM AU

BURN

RD

E NATOMA STBEEC

H AV

E

COLL

EGE O

AK D

R

AMBAS

SADOR DR

OAK AVE

COYLE AVE

OAK AVENUE PKY

BALD

WIN

DAM

RD

MYRTLE AVEJAN DR

WALES DR

JACK SON ST

CALVIN DR

DATE

AVE

PALMERSON DR

NAVIO

N DR

ANTE

LOPE NORTH RD

KILGORE RD

WATSON WAY

BAINBRIDGE DR

PASADENA AVE

MORSE AVE

FOLSOM LAKE CROSSING

OLS ON DR

MCAD

OO DR

R US SI R D

HACK

BERR

Y LN

REDWATER DR

ORANGEVALE AVE

MERC

ANTIL

E DR

SPRIG DR

BIDWELL ST

SAN T

A JU

ANIT A

AVE

KINGS WAY

CHASE DR

POPE AVE

SPER

RY DR

OLD AU BURN RD

PALM AVERU

SCH

DR

CARRIAGE DR

OLIVIN

E AVE

WHYTE AVE

TUR N PIKE D

R

FLOWER DR

TYLE

R ST

MONT

CLAI

RE S

T

WOODMORE OAKS DR

BLACKFOOT WAY

WILLARD DR

BUTTERNUT DR

LEMBI DR

GLEN

TREE

DR

LEEDY LN

TARSHES DR

RUNW

AY D

R

GOLD RUSH DRLA SERENA DR

MONU MENT DR

WINDING OAK DR

HEMLO

CK ST

PARKSHORE DR

BRIDGE ST

MCKA

Y ST

AMALGAM WAY

CORDOVA LN

BIG CLOUD WAY

WINDING WAY

CARM

ELO

DR

EDEN OAKS AVE

SHANDWICK DR

TACOMIC DR

ANTELOPE RD

MENKE WAYPIPPIN WAY

HEARTLAND DR

KINGSWOOD DR

GUTH

RIE

ST HALIFAX ST

STEVEN AVE

DUNMORE AVE

WALN

UT AV

E

ROSEVILLE RD

OAK AVE

BEEC

H AV

EKENNETH AVE

SANT

A JUA

NITA

AVE

KENN

ETH

AVE

MORS

E AVE

WALN

UT AV

E

OAK AVE

JAN DR

HACK

BERR

Y LN

OLD AUBURN RD

CENTRAL AVE

PALM AVE

Sacramento County:NE


! SchoolsCities


FRANKLIN BLVD

HWY 1

60RIVER RD

LAMBERT RD

BRUC

EVILL

E RD

S RIVER RD

TWIN CITIES RDJE

FFER

SON

BLVD

LAGUNA BLVD

ELK GROVE BLVD

BILBY RD

LEAR

Y RD

BIG HORN BLVD

ESCHINGER RD

RYER

AVE

HERZ

OG R

D

COURTLAND RD

SHELDON RD

S IM S RD

CENTER PKY

BOND RD

CLARKSBURG AVE

POINT PLEASANT RD

COUN

TY R

OAD

104

CALVINE RD

CORE RD

CARL

IN AV

E

DESMOND RD

HARBOUR POINT DRLAKEPOINT DR

MCLEAN DR

DWIGHT RD

HWY 160

S RIV E R RD SIMS RD

RIVER

RD

RIVER RD

Sacramento County:Delta


! SchoolsCities


FOLSOM BLVD

FLORIN RD

SUNR

ISE B

LVD

WATT

AVE

WHITE ROCK RD

GRANT LINE RD

HOW

E AVE

JACKSON RD

ARDEN WAY

FAIR

OAK

S BL

VD

MADISON AVE

ELDER CREEK RD

BRAD

SHAW

RD

BELL

ST

MARCONI AVE

AUBURN BLVD

EL CAMINO AVE

DOUGLAS RD

S W

ATT A

VE

COLOMA RD

FULT

ON AV

E

FRUITRIDGE RD

EDISON AVE

EXCE

LSIO

R RD

IRON POIN T RD

ZINFANDEL DR

ROSEVILL

E RD

EAST

ERN

AVE

WALN

UT AV

E

POWE

R IN

N RD KIEFER BLVD

WHITNEY AVE

HAZE

L AVE

ENGLE RD

LA RIVIERA DR

MISS

ION

AVE

PRAIRIE CITY RD

AMERICAN RIVER DR

FLOR

IN P

ERKI

NS R

D

LATR

OBE R

D

MORS

E AVE

SAN

JUAN

AVE

HURLEY WAY

65TH ST

NORTH AVE

GARF

IELD

AVE

DATA DR

GUNN

RD

COTTAGE WAY

RALEY BLV D

RIL E Y ST E BIDWELL ST65

TH ST

REET

EXP

Y

14TH AVE

KILGORE RD

HAPPY LN

MANZ

ANITA

AVE

MAYH

EW R

D

GOLD COUNTRY BLVD

ROUTIER RD

BELL AVELA

SIER RA DR

NORTHROP AVE

LUYUNG DR

H ST

21ST AVE

BLUE RAVINE RD

POPE AVE

DEW

EY D

R

SIERRA BLV DAMBA

SSADOR DR

KENN

ETH

AVEPALM AVE

MCGREGOR DR

RECYCLE RD

GRAND AVE

MAIN A VE

ROSEMONT DR

MYRTLE AVE JAN D R

ROOT

AVE

GOETHE RD

PASADENA AVE

HORN RD

TRADE CENTER DRHA

CKBE

RRY L

N

ELVAS AVE

BELVEDERE AVE

CALDERA WAY

KINGS WAY

GREE

NWOO

D AV

E

CHASE DR

SOUTH AVE

CHRYSANTHY BLVD

ROD BEAUDRY DR

53RD AVEBRIGGS D R

UNIVE R SITY AVE

BENITA DR

LINCOLN VILLAGE DR

TURN PIK E DR

THOR

NHILL

DR

MILLS RD

OAK AVE

WRIG

HT ST

WILLARD DR

BISBE

E DR

ETHA

N WA

Y

TARSHES DR

TAL L Y HO DRQUALITY DR

RUNW

AY D

R

GOLD RUSH DR

BRIDGE ST

CORDOVA LN

GOLD RIVER RD

WILLITS DR

WINDING WAY

CARM

ELO

DR

KNOX

RD

VEHICLE DR

HAVERHILL DR

S WHITE ROCK RD

SAVERIEN DR

WRIG

HT ST

MORS

E AVE

COTTAGE WAY

WHITE ROCK RD

MAYHEW RD

KIEFER BLVD

MISSION AVE

NORTH AVE

GARF

IELD

AVE

MAYH

EW R

D

KIEFER BLVD

MYRTLE AVE

Sacramento County:Urban Core


! SchoolsCities


DILLARD RD

FRANKLIN BLVD

MEISS RD

ALTA

MES

A RD

ARNO RD

GRANT LINE RD

BRUC

EVILL

E RD

IONE RD

CALVINE RD

BORDEN RD

TWIN CITIES RD

SHELDON RD

ELK GROVE BLVD

BOND RD

COLO

NY R

D

KOST RD

ORR RD SIMMERHORN RD

LAMBERT RD

BRAD

SHAW

RD

LAGUNA BLVD

BOESSOW RD

ESCHINGER RD CLAY

STA

TION

RD

ELK

GROV

E FL

ORIN

RD

BILBY RD

WILTON RD

CENTER PKY

WALMORT RD

MACK RD

RILE

Y RD

HOBDAY RD

C ST

WOODS RD

DAVIS

RD

BIG HORN BLVD

CHER

OKEE

LN

BLAKE RD

VALENSIN RD

POWER I NN RD

G REEN RD

EXCE

LSIO

R RD

TAVE

RNOR

RDBADE

R RD

MARE

NGO

RD

CHRI

STEN

SEN

RD

CONLEY RD

MCKE

NZIE

RD

SIMS RD

QUIGGLE RD

HARVEY RD

ELSIE AVE

VINEY

ARD

RD

VINTAGE PARK DR

RISING RD

E STOCKTON BLVD

POINT PLEASANT RD

BESKEEN RD

SALAS RD

REIG

L RD

F ST

ED RAU R D

SL O UGHHO USE RD

24 TH ST

WILLARD PKY

JA CINT O AVE

CORE RD

BABS ON DR

ELM AVE

1ST S

T

DESMOND RD

S LINCOLN WAY

W C ST

EHRHARDT AVE

MAINLINE DRPE

LLAN

DINI

RD

FOGG

RD

MIDW

AY AV

E

BE

LLATERRA DR

VALL

EY TR

EE R

DRIPARIAN DR KENT ST

LAKE PARK AVE

W STOCKTON BLVD

BRITTANY PARK DR

SHOR

T RD

LACE

Y RD

KILCONNELL DR

VAUX AVE MACK

EY R

D

WALNUT AVE

ROBBINS RD

DWIGHT RD

MOSHER RD

VALENSIN RD

CALVINE R D

SIMS RD

BRUC

EVILL

E RD

TWIN CITIES RD

BORDEN RD

RISING RD

W STOCKTON BLVD

CLAY

STA

TION

RD

MACKEY RD

Sacramento County:South


! SchoolsCities



Page 39 of 59



SACRAMENTO REGIONAL TRANSIT DISTRICT

31103 SacramentoSacramento Regional Transit District

Combined Projects 4th Avenue/Wayne Hultgren StationShared bike/ped path running from City parking lot/south end of station platform, south along RT ROW, to 7th Ave.

TBD Lower Priority


Combined Projects Fruitridge StationAcquire equipment rental yard to west of station, for PNR lot and pass-through from 25th Street/28th Avenue.

TBD Medium Priority


Planning Sacramento CountyPerform analysis on bicycle accommodation on light rail vehicles and at stations.

Safe Routes to Transit; TransitAction $100,000 Higher Priority




SACRAMENTO COUNTY: MULTI‐AGENCY30095 Sacramento

Multi‐Agency: City of Elk Grove & Sacramento County

Multi‐use Path (Class I) I‐5 Corridor Southern Elk Grove City Limits to Freeport Blvd. 5.4 2010 Sacramento Bikeway Master Plan$3,000,000 ‐ $7,800,000

Higher Priority

30093 SacramentoMulti‐Agency: City of Elk Grove & Sacramento County

Bike Lanes (Class II) Grant Line Road State Route 99 to White Rock Rd 20City of Elk Grove Bicycle & PedestrianMaster Plan

TBD Medium Priority

30096 SacramentoMulti‐Agency: City of Elk Grove & Sacramento County

Pedestrian Upgrade Bradshaw Road.Entire length ‐ separated sidewalks on both sides of street, planter strips, shade trees, improved intersection crossings, mid‐block crossings.

11.5 Sacramento Pedestrian Master Plan TBD Lower Priority

30124 SacramentoMulti‐Agency: City of Folsom & Sacramento County

Multi‐use Path (Class I)Rails to Trails: Folsom Parkway Rail Trail

Folsom Blvd/LRT Corridor from Natoma Station Dr. to Aerojet Rd.


31110 SacramentoMulti‐Agency: Sacramento Regional Transit District & City of Rancho Cordova

Over/Undercrossing Cordova Town Center StationConstruct bike/ped bridge over US‐50 from Olson Drive to Sun Center Drive.

Racnho Cordova's General Plan TBD Lower Priority

31094 SacramentoMulti‐Agency: Sacramento Regional Transit District & City of Sacramento

Combined Projects University/65th Street Station

Sidewalks and bike lane along south side of Folsom Blvd. between 65th ‐ 69th, and sidewalk along south side of Q Street between station and 69th/Redding Avenue.

65th Street Station Area Study; 65th Street/University Transit Village Plan (City of Sacramento)

TBD Higher Priority


Combined Projects Broadway StationPurchase 2 adjacent side yards from houses, to be used for pass‐through/shortcut from Freeport Blvd. to near the south end of Broadway Station.

TBD Lower Priority


Combined Projects Power Inn Station

Pass through PG&E yard from east end of Power Inn Station to Folsom Blvd. at eastern intersection with Bicentennial Circle; sidewalk along south side of Folsom Blvd from Power Inn Rd. to Jackson High Priorityway.

TBD Lower Priority


Over/Undercrossing Swanston StationStairs/ramp from El Camino Avenue UPRR Overcrossing to Swanston Station

TBD Higher Priority


Over/Undercrossing Marconi/Arcade StationStairs/ramp from Marconi Avenue UPRR Overcrossing to Marconi/Arcade Station

Marconi LR Station Technical Background Report (City of Sacramento)

TBD Higher Priority

31098 Sacramento Multi‐Agency: Sacramento Regional TOver/Undercrossing Roseville Road StationPed bridge over UPRR from Roseville Road entrance to Harris Drive, including sidewalks within the station PNR lot.

TBD Higher Priority


Over/Undercrossing Swanston StationStairs/ramp from Arden Way UPRR Overcrossing to Swanston Station (or ped bridge to former USAA office complex)

ped bridge is in: Swanston Station Transit Village Plan (City of Sacramento)

TBD Medium Priority


Sidewalk Swanston Station Sidewalks on Calvados Ave. and Selma St. and Clay Swanston Station Transit Village Plan (City of Sacramento) TBD Higher Priority


Sidewalk Globe StationStairs/ramp from north end of Acoma Street to Arden‐Garden Connector.

TBD Lower Priority


Sidewalk College Greens Station

Sidewalk along south side of Folsom Blvd. from Jackson High Priorityway to west end of College Greens Station; Pedestrian grade crossing from south platform to adjacent development across SPTCJPA ROW, which includes offices leased to the State of California Department of Corrections.

TBD Lower Priority


Sidewalk Marconi/Arcade Station Sidewalks on Academy Way.Marconi LR Station Technical Background Report (City of Sacramento)

TBD Medium Priority

Page 40 of 59




31109 C SacramentoMulti‐Agency: Sacramento Regional Transit District & Sacramento County

Combined Projects Butterfield Station

Purchase 4 adjacent side yards from houses to create a pass‐through from Appalachian Dr. west to Kellingworth Ct. (or 2 adjacent side yards and an easement through a business parking lot) for a pass‐through from Appalachian Dr. south to Folsom Blvd.). Purchase 4 adjacent side yards from houses to create a pass‐through from Elmira Circle west to Appalachian Dr. (or 2 adjacent side yards and an easement through a business parking lot) for a pass‐through from Elmira Circle south to Folsom Blvd.).

TBD Lower Priority

31108 SacramentoMulti‐Agency: Sacramento Regional Transit District & Sacramento County

Combined Projects Tiber Station

Purchase 2 adjacent side yards from houses at southeast corner of Catania Way and at northeast corner of Rio Bravo Circle. Open and pave bike/ped path along both sides of drainage channel running north from Folsom/Mayhew intersection and connect to American River bike trails. Create a pedestrian crossing across the west leg of Folsom/Mayhew intersection.

TBD Medium Priority

31109 A SacramentoMulti‐Agency: Sacramento Regional Transit District & Sacramento County

Combined Projects Butterfield StationExtend sidewalk from there along the north side of Folsom Blvd. east to Butterfield Drive.

TBD Medium Priority

31109 B SacramentoMulti‐Agency: Sacramento Regional Transit District & Sacramento County

Combined Projects Butterfield StationAdd a pass‐through over vacant land from the south end of Pepper Oaks Drive to Folsom Blvd,.

TBD Medium Priority

31097 SacramentoMulti‐Agency: Sacramento Regional Transit District & Sacramento County

Over/Undercrossing Watt/I‐80 Station

Pedestrian bridge from Longview Drive (just east of Watt Avenue) over Business 80 to Park Rd. or Bridge Rd. (just north of Auburn Blvd.); could also be an underpass under Business 80 at Arcade Creek.

TBD Higher Priority

Page 41 of 59




CITY OF LIVE OAK40039 Sutter City of Live Oak Multi‐use Path (Class I) Soccer Park Community Trail SouthWest side of High Priorityway 99 on Apricot St. oximately 3/4 of a mile $1,250,000 Higher Priority

40000 Sutter City of Live Oak Multi‐use Path (Class I) Pennington Road Within City limits, East/West of High Priorityway 99‐ bike lane project.

Approximately 2 miles

County of Sutter and City of Live Oak Bicycle Transportation Plan (2008)

TBD Medium Priority

40001 Sutter City of Live Oak Bike Lanes (Class II) Broadway/ Larkin RoadAlong Broadway and Larkin Road, west of High Priorityway 99 from Pennington Road south to the City Limits‐bike lanes

Approximately 1 mile


TBD Medium Priority

40002 Sutter City of Live Oak Bike Lanes (Class II) Larkin Road East of 99 from Elm Street north to the Clity Limits and Elm Street from High Priorityway 99 to Larkin Road to the City limits‐bike lanes

Approximately 1/2 mile


TBD Medium Priority

40003 Sutter City of Live Oak Combined Projects City of Live OakSouthWest side of High Priorityway 99 on Apricot St. and continue north along the abandoned railroad corridor to Epperson Way. Segment 2

Approximately 1 mile



Page 42 of 59

!

!!

!

!

N TO

WNSH

IP RD

RIVIERA RD

PENNINGTON RD

METT

EER

RD

KENT

AVE

LARK

IN R

D

ARCHER AVE

BROADWAY

LARK

IN R

D

Live Oak Proposed Multi-Use PathProposed Bike LaneProposed Bike Route

! SchoolsCities





CITY OF YUBA CITY40004 Sutter City of Yuba City Multi‐use Path (Class I)

Rails to Trails: Abandoned Railroad Right‐of‐Way

Hooper Road to Bridge Street 2.9 Yuba City Bicycle Master Plan (2011) $4,100,000 Higher Priority

40005 Sutter City of Yuba City Multi‐use Path (Class I)Feather River West Levee Path Connection

B Street to Second Street 0.57 Yuba City Bicycle Master Plan (2011) $225,000 Higher Priority

40016 Sutter City of Yuba City Multi‐use Path (Class I) Burns Drive Levee Access Burns Drive to Feather River West Levee 0.05 Yuba City Bicycle Master Plan (2011) $95,000 Medium Priority40017 Sutter City of Yuba City Multi‐use Path (Class I) Feather River West Levee North ExtensNorthgate Drive to City Limits 0.67 Yuba City Bicycle Master Plan (2011) $161,000 Medium Priority40006 Sutter City of Yuba City Bike Lanes (Class II) Clark Avenue Pease Road to Kensington Way 0.13 Yuba City Bicycle Master Plan (2011) $247,000 Higher Priority

40007 Sutter City of Yuba City Bike Lanes (Class II) Butte House Road Township Road to Tharp Road 2.3 Yuba City Bicycle Master Plan (2011) $92,000 Higher Priority

40008 Sutter City of Yuba City Bike Lanes (Class II) Lincoln Road State Route 99 to Karen Drive 0.15 Yuba City Bicycle Master Plan (2011) $45,000 Higher Priority

40009 Sutter City of Yuba City Bike Lanes (Class II) Pease Road Butte Vista Road to Clark Avenue 1.39 Yuba City Bicycle Master Plan (2011) $417,000 Higher Priority

40010 Sutter City of Yuba City Bike Lanes (Class II) Tharp Road Lassen Boulevard to Butte House Road 0.78 Yuba City Bicycle Master Plan (2011) $234,000 Higher Priority40011 Sutter City of Yuba City Bike Lanes (Class II) Franklin Road Harding Road to Walton Avenue 0.5 Yuba City Bicycle Master Plan (2011) $3,000 Higher Priority40012 Sutter City of Yuba City Bike Lanes (Class II) Teegarden Avenue Plumas Street to Second Street 0.39 Yuba City Bicycle Master Plan (2011) $117,000 Higher Priority40013 Sutter City of Yuba City Bike Lanes (Class II) Blevin Road Butte Vista School to Butte House Road 0.68 Yuba City Bicycle Master Plan (2011) $204,000 Higher Priority40014 Sutter City of Yuba City Bike Lanes (Class II) Bunce Road Richland Road to Lincoln Road 0.38 Yuba City Bicycle Master Plan (2011) $114,000 Higher Priority40015 Sutter City of Yuba City Bike Lanes (Class II) Bridge Street Walton Avenue to Second Street 2.02 Yuba City Bicycle Master Plan (2011) $343,000 Higher Priority40027 Sutter City of Yuba City Bike Lanes (Class II) King Avenue Clark Avenue & Live Oak Boulevard 0.28 Yuba City Bicycle Master Plan (2011) $300,000 Higher Priority40028 Sutter City of Yuba City Bike Lanes (Class II) Lassen Boulevard Harter Parkway & Walton Avenue 0.62 Yuba City Bicycle Master Plan (2011) $38,000 Higher Priority40040 Sutter City of Yuba City Bike Lanes (Class II) Clark Avenue Washington Avenue to Spiva Avenue 1.49 Yuba City Bicycle Master Plan (2011) $447,000 Lower Priority40041 Sutter City of Yuba City Bike Lanes (Class II) North Colusa Frontage Road Royo Ranchero Road to Harter Parkway 1.37 Yuba City Bicycle Master Plan (2011) $55,000 Lower Priority40042 Sutter City of Yuba City Bike Lanes (Class II) Richland Road Walton Avenue to South Barrett Road 0.64 Yuba City Bicycle Master Plan (2011) $192,000 Lower Priority40043 Sutter City of Yuba City Bike Lanes (Class II) Richland Road Bunce Road to Railroad Avenue 0.13 Yuba City Bicycle Master Plan (2011) $40,000 Lower Priority40044 Sutter City of Yuba City Bike Lanes (Class II) South Barrett Road Franklin Avenue to Richland Road 0.65 Yuba City Bicycle Master Plan (2011) $195,000 Lower Priority40024 Sutter City of Yuba City Bike Lanes (Class II) El Margarita Road Spirit Drive & Imperial Way 0.54 Yuba City Bicycle Master Plan (2011) $30,000 Medium Priority40025 Sutter City of Yuba City Bike Lanes (Class II) George Washington Boulevard State Route 20 & 1000’ N/Franklin Road 0.71 Yuba City Bicycle Master Plan (2011) $213,000 Medium Priority40026 Sutter City of Yuba City Bike Lanes (Class II) Harter Parkway Lassen Boulevard & Butte House Road 0.92 Yuba City Bicycle Master Plan (2011) $40,000 Medium Priority40029 Sutter City of Yuba City Bike Lanes (Class II) Market Street Live Oak Boulevard & Sutter Street 0.75 Yuba City Bicycle Master Plan (2011) $15,000 Medium Priority40030 Sutter City of Yuba City Bike Lanes (Class II) North Colusa Frontage Road Western Parkway & Harter Parkway 1.58 Yuba City Bicycle Master Plan (2011) $474,000 Medium Priority40031 Sutter City of Yuba City Bike Lanes (Class II) Richland Road Littlejohn Road & Walton Avenue 0.2 Yuba City Bicycle Master Plan (2011) $60,000 Medium Priority

40032 Sutter City of Yuba City Bike Lanes (Class II) South Colusa Frontage Road George Washington Boulevard & El Margarita Road 0.5 Yuba City Bicycle Master Plan (2011) $150,000 Medium Priority

40033 Sutter City of Yuba City Bike Lanes (Class II) Sutter Street Market Street & Bridge Street 0.63 Yuba City Bicycle Master Plan (2011) $189,000 Medium Priority40034 Sutter City of Yuba City Bike Lanes (Class II) Walton Avenue Augusta Lane & Bogue Road 0.48 Yuba City Bicycle Master Plan (2011) $144,000 Medium Priority40045 Sutter City of Yuba City Bike Lanes (Class II) Franklin Avenue Percy Avenue to Wilbur Avenue 0.28 Yuba City Bicycle Master Plan (2011) $84,000 Medium Priority40023 Sutter City of Yuba City Bike Lanes (Class II) Stripe Class II Bicycle Lanes Various Locations N/A Yuba City Bicycle Master Plan (2011) $50,000

40020 Sutter City of Yuba City Education/PromotionBike Safety Education Program for Schools

N/A N/A Yuba City Bicycle Master Plan (2011) $100,000

40022 Sutter City of Yuba City Education/PromotionBike Safety Education Program for Adults

N/A N/A Yuba City Bicycle Master Plan (2011) $100,000

40021 Sutter City of Yuba City Intersections 36 Signal Retrofits for Bicycle DetectionVarious locations N/A Yuba City Bicycle Master Plan (2011) $285,000 Higher Priority40018 Sutter City of Yuba City Wayfinding Destination Signage (Wayfinding) Various locations N/A Yuba City Bicycle Master Plan (2011) $40,000 Lower Priority

Page 43 of 59

!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!

!

!

!

PEASE RD

GARDEN HWY

LIVE OAK BLVD

S TOW

NSHI

P RD

S WAL

TON

AVE

BUTTE HOUSE RD

S GEO

RGE

WASH

INGT

ON BL

VD

BOGUE RD

LINCOLN RD

CLAR

K AVE

N W

ALTO

N AV

E

RAILR

OAD

AVE

QUEENS AVE

HART

ER R

D

FRANKLIN RD

RICHLAND RD

BRIDGE ST

EL M

ARGA

RITA

RD

TIERR

A BUE

NA R

D

E ONS

TOTT

FRON

TAGE

RD

STAB

LER

LN

N GE

ORGE

WAS

HING

TON

BLVD

THAR

P RD

FRANKLIN AVE

MARKET ST

GRAY

AVE

GRAY

AVE PEASE RD

FRANKLIN AVE

FRANKLIN RD

GRAY

AVE

Yuba City Proposed Multi-Use PathProposed Bike LaneProposed Bike Route

! SchoolsCities



Page 44 of 59



SUTTER COUNTY40046 Sutter Sutter County Multi-use Path (Class I) Sutter Bike Trail Widneing from Hooper Rd. to Acacia Ave. 4.66 miles Sutter County Bike Master Plan (2012) $783,000 Higher Priority

40047 Sutter Sutter County Multi-use Path (Class I) Sutter Bike TrailRest lot paving at Almendra Rd. and North Township Rd.

9,000 sq ft Sutter County Bike Master Plan (2012 ) $54,000 Medium Priority

40036 Sutter Sutter County Bike Lanes (Class II) California Street From Washington St. to Butte House Rd. 0.50 mile Sutter County Bike Master Plan (2012) $178,367 Higher Priority40037 Sutter Sutter County Bike Lanes (Class II) Sutter Street From Acacia Ave. to Oak St. 0.70 mile Sutter County Bike Master Plan (2012) $213,515 Higher Priority40038 Sutter Sutter County Bike Lanes (Class II) Acacia Avenue From Butte House Rd. to Pass Rd. 0.33 mile Sutter County Bike Master Plan (2012) $75,000 Medium Priority40035 Sutter Sutter County Pedestrian Upgrade Phillips Road From Bogue Rd. to Lincoln Rd. 0.99 mile Sutter County Bike Master Plan (2012) $100,000 Lower Priority

HWY 7

0

LARK

IN R

D

PENNINGTON RD

CLARK RD

FRANKLIN RD

LIVE OAK BLVD

KENT

AVE

SANDERS RD

PEASE RD

N TO

WNSH

IP RD

BOGUE RD

BROA

DWAY

LINCOLN RD

PASS RD

PASEO AVE

GARDEN HWY

EAST

BUTT

E RD

HUMP

HREY

RD

S TOW

NSHI

P RD

S WAL

TON

AVE

ENCINAL RD

EAGER RD

MADD

EN AV

E

BUTTE HOUSE RD

JACK

SLOU

GH RD

CLEM

ENTS

RD

RAMIREZ RD

WOODRUFF LN

METT

EER

RD

NUESTRO RD

HWY 20

SOUTH BUTTE RD

S GEO

RGE

WASH

INGT

ON BL

VD

N BEALE RD

ARCHER AVE

ACAC

IA AV

E

ARBOGA RD

GRAN

D AVE

CLARK AVE

SIMPSON LN

N W

ALTO

N AV

E

NORTH BUTTE RD

S HU

MPHR

EY R

D

R AIL R

OAD

AVE

HART

ER R

D

TIERR

A BUE

NA R

D

LYTL

E RD

RICHLAND RD

RIVERSIDE DR

BRIDGE ST

EL M

ARGA

RITA

RD E O

NSTO

TT FR

ONTA

GE R

D

N GE

ORGE

WAS

HING

TON

BLVD

REDNALL RD

THAR

P RD

OAK S

T

FRANKLIN AVE

LARK

IN R

D

HWY 70

LINCOLN RD

BUTTE HOUSE RD HWY 20

BROADWAY

BOGUE RD

PEASE RDEAST

BUTT

E RD

ACAC

IA AV

E

Sutter County Proposed Multi-Use PathProposed Bike LaneProposed Bike Route

! SchoolsCities



Page 45 of 59



CITY OF DAVIS50126 Yolo City of Davis Multi-use Path (Class I) / Bike Lanes (Class II) First and B Street Intersection n/a City of Davis Bike Plan (2009) TBD Higher Priority50107 Yolo City of Davis Bike Lanes (Class II) Fifth Street A Street to L Street 0.7 miles City of Davis Bike Plan (2009) $1.2m Higher Priority50108 Yolo City of Davis Bike Lanes (Class II) Fourth Street, Eighth Street At railroad tracks between H and I Streets 0.1 miles City of Davis Bike Plan (2009) $190,000 Higher Priority50109 Yolo City of Davis Bike Lanes (Class II) Olive Dr and Richards Blvd Intersection n/a City of Davis Bike Plan (2009) TBD Higher Priority50110 Yolo City of Davis Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) Third Street A Street to B Street 0.1 miles Core Area Plan $2-6m Higher Priority50111 Yolo City of Davis Bike Route (Class III) Drexel Drive Snyder Drive to J Street 0.7 miles In-progress TBD Higher Priority50112 Yolo City of Davis Bike Route (Class III) Downtown Various TBD TBD

50113 Yolo City of Davis Support Facilities Parking, on-street in various locations Various n/a City of Davis Bike Plan (2009) TBD Medium Priority

50114 Yolo City of Davis Wayfinding City-wide City-wide TBD City of Davis Bike Plan (2009) TBD Medium Priority

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

I 80

F ST

L ST

FIFTH ST

B ST

CHILES RD

SECOND ST

MACE

BLVD

POLE

LINE

RD

E COVELL BLVD

COWELL BLVD

J ST

E EIGHTH ST

LOYOLA DR

OLIVE DR

A ST

COUN

TY R

OAD

105

THIRD ST

ALHAMBRA DR

MOORE BLVDLILLARD DR

FIRST ST

ROCKWELL DR

RICHARDS BLVD

RESEARCH PARK DR

W COVELL BLVD

TULIP

LN

OLD D

AVIS

RD

DANBURY ST

RUSSELL BLVD

GRANDE AVE

S A ST

DRUM

MOND

AVE

E FOURTEENTH ST

A NDERSON RD

EL CEMONTE AVE

WRIGHT BLVD

I 80

Davis:East


! SchoolsCities


!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

F ST

I 80

HWY 1

13

L ST

B ST

FIFTH ST

RUSSELL BLVD

W COVELL BLVD

POLE

LINE

RD

J ST

E EIGHTH ST

ANDE

RSON

RD

SYCA

MORE

LN

L AK E

BLV

D

E COVELL BLVD

OLIVE DR

A ST

SECOND ST

THIRD ST

W EIGHTH ST

COWELL B

LVD

COUN

TY R

OAD

99

SHASTA DR

MOORE BLVD

CATALINA DR

LOYOLA DR

ARTH

UR S

T

ARLINGTON BLVD

VILLANOVA DR

FIRST ST

MARINA CIR

DENA

LI DR

GRANDE AVE ROCK WELL DR

HUMBOLDT AVE

RICHARDS BLVD

JOHN

JONE

S RD

RESEARCH PARK DR

LILLARD DR

HUTCHISON DR

TULIP

LN

OLD D

AVIS

RD

ALVARADO AVE

S A ST

E FOURTEENTH STHAMPTON DR

I 80

HWY 1

13

Davis:West


! SchoolsCities





CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO50152 Yolo City of West Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I)

Sacramento River Northeast Class I Bike Path

Co Rd 136/Levee Rd from 1st St to River River Crest Dr

0.87 2013 City of West Sacramento Bicycle Pedestrian Trails Maste $461,100

50153 Yolo City of West Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I) Northwest Bike Path Tule Sake Rd/Rd 127 from N. Harbor Blvd to I‐80 2.90 2013 City of West Sacramento Bicycle Pedestrian Trails Maste $2,342,000

50157 Yolo City of West Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I)Sewer Easement Class I Bike Path and Tunnel

Existing Sewer Easement from Rice Ave to Park Blvd and Manzanita Way to Yolo St

1.70 2013 City of West Sacramento Bicycle Pedestrian Trails Maste $7,149,300

50167 Yolo City of West Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I) Pioneer Bluff Class I Bike PathAlong Sacramento River within Pioneer Bluff Planning Area from Jefferson Blvd Railroad Bridge to Existing River Walk Trail


50168 Yolo City of West Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I)Jefferson Blvd Railroad Bridge Class I Bike Path

Jefferson Blvd Railroad Bridge from Across Deep Water Ship Channel


50169 Yolo City of West Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I) Main Drain Trail Class I Bike Path

Main Drain Canal (does not include existing segment of unpaved trail) from Lake Washington Blvd to Deep Water Ship Channel south end of town)


50170 Yolo City of West Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I)Convert Unpaved Main Drain Trail to Class I Bike Path

Main Drain Trail from Catalina Island Rd to Golden Gate Dr


50171 Yolo City of West Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I)Convert Unpaved Clarksburg Branch Line Trail to Class I Bike Path

Clarksburg Branch Line Trail from Jefferson Blvd to S. River Rd


50172 Yolo City of West Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I)Convert Unpaved Deep Water Ship Channel Path to Class I Bike Path

Deep Water Ship Channel from Jefferson Blvd to Industrial Blvd


50173 Yolo City of West Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I)Sacramento River Levee Road Class I Bike Path (North)

Sacramento River Levee Road (N) from Jefferson Blvd to Davis Rd


50174 Yolo City of West Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I)Sacramento River Levee Road Class I Bike Path (South)

Sacramento River Levee Road (S) from Davis Rd to West Sacramento City Limit (Southeast)


50185 Yolo City of West Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I)

Class I Bike Path adjacent to Proposed Village Pkwy from Clarksburg Branch Line Trail to Jefferson Blvd

Proposed Village Pkwy from Clarksburg Branch Line Trail to Jefferson Blvd


50188 Yolo City of West Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I)Deep Water Ship Channel Class I Bike Path South

River Road (Deep Water Shipping Channel) from Marshall Rd to South end of Proposed Main Drain Trail


50191 Yolo City of West Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I)Class I Bike Path East on Utility Eastment in Liberty

Utility Easement from Davis Rd to Clarksburg Branch Line Trail


50194 Yolo City of West Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I)Class I Bike Path adjacent to Davis Rd from Clarksburg Branch Line Trail to Sacramento River Levee Rd

Davis Rd from Clarksburg Branch Line Trail to Sacramento River Levee Rd


50197 Yolo City of West Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I)Class I Bike Route on New C St Bridge (I Street Bridge Replacement)

C St from 3rd St across New Bridge 0.11 2013 City of West Sacramento Bicycle Pedestrian Trails Maste $55,710

50198 Yolo City of West Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I) Class I Bike Path under I St BridgeUnder I Street Bridge from 1st St to Co Rd 136/Levee Rd


50199 Yolo City of West Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I)Class I Bike Path under Tower Bridge Gateway

Under Tower Bridge Gateway from River Walk Trail to River Walk Trail


50201 Yolo City of West Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I)Class I Bike Path connecting Silverwood Drive to Deep Water Ship Channel Bike Path

Silverwood Drive cul‐de‐sac from Silverwood Drive to Deep Water Ship Channel


50205 Yolo City of West Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I)Class I Bike Path on New Broadway Bridge

Broadway from S River Road to Sacramento City Limits


50207 Yolo City of West Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I)Class I Bike Path around Lake Washington

Lake Washington from Deep Water Ship Channel to Main Drain Canal


50208 Yolo City of West Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I)Class I Bike Path over Sacramento River

Sacramento River from River Park Walk to R Street Bridge


50209 Yolo City of West Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I)Deep Water Ship Channel Class I Bike Path North

River Road (Deep Water Shipping Channel) from Proposed Main Drain Trail to Industrial Blvd


50211 Yolo City of West Sacramento Multi‐use Path (Class I)Deep Water Ship Channel Class I Bike Path Jefferson Connection

River Road (Deep Water Shipping Channel) from Proposed Main Drain Trail toJefferson Blvd


50189 Yolo City of West Sacramento Unpaved TrailUnpaved Trail on Marshall Rd (South Side) from River Rd (W) to Jefferson Blvd

Marshall Rd (S Side) from River Rd (W) to Jefferson Blvd


50190 Yolo City of West Sacramento Unpaved Trail Unpaved Trail on Jefferson Rd (East Sid Jefferson Blvd (E Side) from Marshall Rd to Davis Rd 0.23 2013 City of West Sacramento Bicycle Pedestrian Trails Maste $27,600

50193 Yolo City of West Sacramento Unpaved TrailUnpaved Trail on Davis Rd from Jefferson Blvd to Clarksburg Branch Line Trail

Davis Rd from Jefferson Blvd to Clarksburg Branch Line Trail


50147 Yolo City of West Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II)Convert Class III Bike Route to Class II Bike Lanes on Lighthouse Dr from Douglas St to Fountain Dr

Lighthouse Dr from Douglas St to Fountain Dr 0.25 2013 City of West Sacramento Bicycle Pedestrian Trails Maste $4,710

50148 Yolo City of West Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II)Class II Bike Lanes on Reed Ave from Riverside Pkwy to Harbor Blvd

Reed Ave from Riverside Pkwy to Harbor Blvd 0.93 2013 City of West Sacramento Bicycle Pedestrian Trails Maste $17,640

Page 46 of 59




50149 Yolo City of West Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II)Class II Bike Lanes on 5th St from A St to Tower Bridge Gateway

5th St from A St to Tower Bridge Gateway 0.64 2013 City of West Sacramento Bicycle Pedestrian Trails Maste $1,984,540

50150 Yolo City of West Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II)Convert Class III Bike Route to Class II Bike Lanes on C St from 6th St to 3rd St

C St from 6th St to 3rd St 0.21 2013 City of West Sacramento Bicycle Pedestrian Trails Maste $656,620

50151 Yolo City of West Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II)Class II Bike Lanes on New C St Bridge (I Street Bridge Replacement)

C St from 3rd St across New Bridge 0.33 2013 City of West Sacramento Bicycle Pedestrian Trails Maste $242,440

50213 Yolo City of West Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II)Class II Bike Lanes on Michigan Blvd from Rockrose Rd to Jefferson Blvd

Michigan Blvd from Rockrose Rd to Jefferson Blvd 0.03 2013 City of West Sacramento Bicycle Pedestrian Trails Maste $91,530

50158 Yolo City of West Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II)

Class II Bike Lanes on Jefferson Blvd from W. Capitol Ave to Webster St and Park Blvd from Webster St to Jefferson Blvd. *

Jefferson Blvd from W. Capitol Ave to Webster St and Webster St to Jefferson Blvd


50159 Yolo City of West Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II)Class II Bike Lanes on Harbor Blvd from W. Capitol Ave to Industrial Blvd

Harbor Blvd from W. Capitol Ave to Industrial Blvd 0.68 2013 City of West Sacramento Bicycle Pedestrian Trails Maste $2,108,000

50160 Yolo City of West Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II)Class II Bike Lanes on Industrial Blvd from Harbor Blvd to Terminal St

Industrial Blvd from Harbor Blvd to Terminal St 0.43 2013 City of West Sacramento Bicycle Pedestrian Trails Maste $321,050

50161 Yolo City of West Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II)Class II Bike Lanes on Garden St from Tower Bridge Gateway to 5th St

Garden St from Tower Bridge Gateway to 5th St 0.34 2013 City of West Sacramento Bicycle Pedestrian Trails Maste $248,190

50162 Yolo City of West Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II)Class II Bike Lanes on S. River Rd from 15th St to Culdasac End

S. River Rd from 15th St to Culdasac End 0.71 2013 City of West Sacramento Bicycle Pedestrian Trails Maste $521,950

50163 Yolo City of West Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II)Class II Bike Lanes on Village Pkwy Extension from S. River Rd to Stonegate Dr

Village Pkwy Extension from S. River Rd to Stonegate Dr


50164 Yolo City of West Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II)Class II Bike Lanes on 15th St from Jefferson Blvd to 5th St

15th St from Jefferson Blvd to 5th St 0.10 2013 City of West Sacramento Bicycle Pedestrian Trails Maste $1,950

50165 Yolo City of West Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II)Class II Bike Lanes on Enterprise Blvd from I‐80 WB Ramps to Channel Dr

Enterprise Blvd from I‐80 WB Ramps to Channel Dr 1.22 2013 City of West Sacramento Bicycle Pedestrian Trails Maste $23,270

50166 Yolo City of West Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II)Class II Bike Lanes on Enterprise Blvd Extension from Channel Dr to Southport Pkwy

Enterprise Blvd Extension from Channel Dr to Southport Pkwy


50175 Yolo City of West Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II)Class II Bike Lanes on Gateway Dr from Clarksburg Branch Line Trail to N. Beach Ave

Gateway Dr from Clarksburg Branch Line Trail to N. Beach Ave


50176 Yolo City of West Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II)Class II Bike Lanes on Stonegate Dr north of Lake Washington Blvd

Stonegate Dr from Lake Washington Blvd to existing bike lanes north


50177 Yolo City of West Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II)Class II Bike Lane on Lake Washington Blvd (South Side) from Jefferson Blvd to Stonegate Dr

Lake Washington Blvd (S Side) from Shopping center driveway to Stonegate Dr


50178 Yolo City of West Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II)Class II Bike Lane on Linden Rd (North Side) from Clarksburg Branch Line Trail to Stonegate Dr

Linden Rd (N Side) from Clarksburg Branch Line Trail to Stonegate Dr


50179 Yolo City of West Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II)Class II Bike Lane on Village Pkwy (East Side) from Jefferson Blvd to Stonegate Dr

Village Pkwy (E Side) from Elk Valley St to Lake Washington Blvd


50180 Yolo City of West Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II)Class II Bike Lane on Lake Washington Blvd (South Side) from Redwood Ave to Village Pkwy

Lake Washington Blvd (S Side) from Redwood Ave to Village Pkwy


50181 Yolo City of West Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II)Class II Bike Lanes on Linden Rd from Spruce St to Sacramento River Levee Rd

Linden Rd from Spruce Way to Sacramento River Levee Rd


50182 Yolo City of West Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II)Class II Bike Lanes on Proposed Village Pkwy from Lake Washington Blvd to Davis Rd

Proposed Village Pkwy from Lake Washington Blvd to Davis Rd


50183 Yolo City of West Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II)Class II Bike Lanes on Proposed Village Pkwy from Davis Rd to Clarksburg Branch Line Trail

Proposed Village Pkwy from Davis Rd to Clarksburg Branch Line Trail


50184 Yolo City of West Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II)Class II Bike Lanes on Proposed Village Pkwy from Clarksburg Branch Line Trail to Jefferson Blvd

Proposed Village Pkwy from Clarksburg Branch Line Trail to Jefferson Blvd


50186 Yolo City of West Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II)Convert Class III Bike Route to Class II Bike Lanes on Southport Pkwy from Lake Washington Blvd to Main Canal

Southport Pkwy from Lake Washington Blvd to Main Canal (east of Ramco St)


50192 Yolo City of West Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II)Class II Bike Lanes on Stonegate Dr Extension from Hoopa Rd to Davis Rd

Stonegate Dr Extension from Hoopa Rd to Davis Rd 0.55 2013 City of West Sacramento Bicycle Pedestrian Trails Maste $406,350

Page 47 of 59




50195 Yolo City of West Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II)Class II Bike Lanes on Jefferson Blvd from Harmon Rd to Gregory Ave

Jefferson Blvd from Harmon Rd to Gregory Rd 0.46 2013 City of West Sacramento Bicycle Pedestrian Trails Maste $8,740

50196 Yolo City of West Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II)Class II Bike Lanes on Southport Pkwy from Otis Ave to Jefferson Blvd

Southport Pkwy from Otis Ave to Jefferson Blvd 0.27 2013 City of West Sacramento Bicycle Pedestrian Trails Maste $102,500

50200 Yolo City of West Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II)Class II Bike Lanes on Jefferson Blvd from Gregory Rd to West Sacramento City Limit (Southwest)

Jefferson Blvd from Gregory Rd to West Sacramento City Limit (Southwest)


50202 Yolo City of West Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II) Class II Bike Lanes on New Broadway BrBroadway from South River Rd to Broadway 0.27 2013 City of West Sacramento Bicycle Pedestrian Trails Maste $199,800

50203 Yolo City of West Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II)Class II Bike Lanes on 5th St from Mill St to South River Road

5th St from Mill St to South River Rd 0.11 2013 City of West Sacramento Bicycle Pedestrian Trails Maste $341,000

50206 Yolo City of West Sacramento Bike Lanes (Class II) Class II Bike Lanes on Linden Rd Linden Rd from Jefferson Blvd to Summerfield Dr 0.76 2013 City of West Sacramento Bicycle Pedestrian Trails Maste $14,440

50212 Yolo City of West Sacramento Bike Route (Class III)

Class III Bike Route on N. Harbor Blvd from Sacramento Ave/Reed Ave to West Sacramento City Limit (Northwest)

N. Harbor Blvd from Sacramento Ave/Reed Ave to West Sacramento City Limit (Northwest)


50143 Yolo City of West Sacramento Bike Route (Class III)Class III Bike Route on Riverbank Road from N. Harbor Blvd to Todhunter Ave

Riverbank Road from N. Harbor Blvd to Todhunter Ave


50144 Yolo City of West Sacramento Bike Route (Class III) Bryte Park Bike BoulevardLisbon Ave, Todhunter Ave, Anna St, Arthur Dr, Cummins Way, 6th St from Sunset Ave to C St


50145 Yolo City of West Sacramento Bike Route (Class III)Class III Bike Route on Todhunter Ave from Riverbank Rd to Lisbon Ave

Todhunter Ave from Riverbank Rd to Lisbon Ave 0.28 2013 City of West Sacramento Bicycle Pedestrian Trails Maste $2,750

50146 Yolo City of West Sacramento Bike Route (Class III)Class III Bike Route on Kegle Dr from Cummins Way to Fremont Blvd

Kegle Dr from Cummins Way to Fremont Blvd 0.20 2013 City of West Sacramento Bicycle Pedestrian Trails Maste $2,010

50154 Yolo City of West Sacramento Bike Route (Class III) Westacre Class I Bike BoulevardWestacre Rd, 15th St from Manzanita Way to Jefferson Blvd


50155 Yolo City of West Sacramento Bike Route (Class III)Convert Class II Bike Lanes to Class III Bike Route on W. Capitol Ave from Glide Ave to Westacre Rd

W. Capitol Ave from Glide Ave to Westacre Rd 0.80 2013 City of West Sacramento Bicycle Pedestrian Trails Maste $7,970

50156 Yolo City of West Sacramento Bike Route (Class III)Class III Bike Route on Rockrose Rd from Westacre Rd to Michigan Blvd

Rockrose Rd from Westacre Rd to Michigan Blvd 0.20 2013 City of West Sacramento Bicycle Pedestrian Trails Maste $2,030

50187 Yolo City of West Sacramento Bike Route (Class III)Class III Bike Route on Catalina Island Rd from Golden Date Dr to Unpaved Main Drain Trail

Catalina Island Rd from Golden Date Dr to Unpaved Main Drain Trail


50204 Yolo City of West Sacramento Bike Route (Class III) Class III Bike Route on Arlington RoadArlington Rd from Main Drain Trail to Lake Washington Blvd


50210 Yolo City of West Sacramento Bike Route (Class III) 4th Street and Levee Rd Connection Levee Rd from 4th Street and Levee Rd. 0.08 2013 City of West Sacramento Bicycle Pedestrian Trails Maste $840

Page 48 of 59

50 EB 50 WB

JEFFE

RSON BL

VD

RIVER

SIDE B

LVD

5TH S

T

X ST

T ST

9TH S

T

Q STP ST

W ST

L ST

FREE

PORT

BLVD

N ST

J ST 10TH

ST

F ST

7TH S

T

GARDEN HWY

WEST CAPITOL AVE

SOUT

HPOR

T PKY

GLORIA DR

S LAND PARK DR

8TH S

TH ST

SOUT

H R

IVER RD

INDUSTRIAL BLVD BROADWAY

LAND

PARK

DR

43RD AVE

REED AVE

PARK B

LVD

LINDEN RD

OTIS

AVE

G ST

FRON

T ST

K ST

3RD

ST

MARSHALL RD

HARB

OR BL

VD

E ST

STON

EGAT

E D

R

SACRAMENTO AVE

35TH AVE

2ND AVE

ANNA ST

FLORIN RD

FRUITRIDGE RD

16TH

ST

KEGL

E DRCARRIE ST

15TH ST

12TH

ST

HAVENSIDE DR

LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD

JIBBOOM ST

GREENHAVEN DR

SUTTERVILLE RD

I ST

EVERGREEN AVEMERKLEY AVE

WEST

ACRE

RD

TOWER BRIDGE GTWY

HIGGINS RD

RICHARDS BLVD

NORTH HARBOR BLVD

STONE BLVD

MICHIGAN BLVD

SEAPORT BLVD

CARLIN DR

BRYTE AVE

LIGHT HOUSE DR

ENTERP RISE BLVD

CUMMINS WAY

SEAMAS AVE

KARB

ET W

AY

R IVERBANK RD

VILLAGE PKY

CAPITOL MALL

RAMCO ST

CEBR

IAN S

T

DEL MONTE ST

IRVIN WAY

STILL

WATER

RD

OAKLAND BAY DR

VALLEJO WAY

RISKE

LN

N 7TH

ST

PARKWAY BLVD

GO

LDEN GATE DR

PARK RIVIERA WAY

BLAIR AVE

I STREET BRG

C ST

PINE

ST

GATEWAY DR

GREGORY AVESY

CAMO

RE AV

E

RIVERSIDE PKY

6TH

ST

VILLAGE PKY

LINDEN RD

3RD S

T

5TH

ST

15TH

ST

SOUT

H RIVE

R RD

West Sacramento Proposed Multi-Use PathProposed Bike LaneProposed Bike Route

! SchoolsCities





CITY OF WINTERS50118 Yolo City of Winters Multi‐use Path (Class I) Main Street West section of Main Street City of Winters Grant Ave Corridor Plan $550,000

50119 Yolo City of Winters Multi‐use Path (Class I) Yolo County/City of WintersFrom Yolo County Housing authority into the City of Winters‐ class I pedestrian/bicycle facility to provide connectivity

TBD

50125 Yolo City of Winters Multi‐use Path (Class I) Winters Putah Creek Pedestrian and Bike Bridge Putah Creek Park Master Plan $850,000

50115 Yolo City of Winters Bike/Pedestrian Upgrade SR 128From East Main Street to I‐505 Interchange‐ Class I/II bike lanes and pedestrian facilities.

City of Winters Complete Streets‐ Grant Ave. Corridor Plan TBD

50116 Yolo City of Winters Bike/Pedestrian Upgrade SR 128From the I‐505 Interchange to El Rio Villa‐Yolo Housing‐ Bike and Pedestrian Facilities


50117 Yolo City of Winters Bike/Pedestrian Upgrade SR 128/Grant Ave From Railroad Ave. to East Main Street‐ Sidewalk/Class I/II Bike Improvements


50120 Yolo City of Winters Pedestrian UpgradeGrant Avenue. (SR 128)/Morgan St. Intersection Pedestrian circulation & safety improvements $250,000

50121 Yolo City of Winters Pedestrian Upgrade Walnut LaneRoundabout at Walnut Lane and other locations and Pedestrian Facilities

City of Winters Complete Streets‐ Grant Ave. Corridor Plan $550,000

50122 Yolo City of Winters Pedestrian Upgrade WintersNew sidewalks on: Edwards St., Grant Ave., & Hemenway St.

$188,506

50123 Yolo City of Winters Pedestrian Upgrade Winters

Pedestrian improvements at multiple intersections: Railroad Ave./Main St. Railroad Ave./Abbey St. E. Main St./Elliot St. Main St./First St. Main St./Second St.

$500,000

50124 Yolo City of Winters Pedestrian Upgrade Winters Railroad Avenue to East Main Street City of Winters Complete Streets‐ Grant Ave. Corridor Plan $600,000

Page 49 of 59

!

!

!

!

!

!

I 505

MAIN ST

HWY 128

E GRANT AVE

E MAIN ST

GRANT AVERA

ILROA

D ST

COUN

TY R

OAD

89

RUSSELL BLVD

ANDERSON AVE

BAKER ST

EAST ST

W GRANT AVE

HE MENWA Y ST

FOURTH ST

E BAKER ST

I 505

Winters Proposed Multi-Use PathProposed Bike LaneProposed Bike Route

! SchoolsCities





CITY OF WOODLAND50071 Yolo City of Woodland Multi‐use Path (Class I)

Rails to Trails: Yolo Short Line RR parallel to Main St.

from Pioneer Ave. to East St. City of Woodland Bicycle Transportation Plan $1,500,000 Higher Priority

50073 Yolo City of Woodland Bike Lanes (Class II) Spring Lake Area CR24C ‐ Parkland to College Spring Lake Specific Plan TBD Higher Priority50074 Yolo City of Woodland Bike Lanes (Class II) Spring Lake Area CR25A ‐ CR102 to HWY 113 Spring Lake Specific Plan TBD Higher Priority50075 Yolo City of Woodland Bike Lanes (Class II) Spring Lake Area Parkland Ave. ‐ Pioneer to CR25A Spring Lake Specific Plan TBD Higher Priority50076 Yolo City of Woodland Bike Lanes (Class II) Spring Lake Area Farmer's Central ‐ Pioneer to W. End Spring Lake Specific Plan TBD Higher Priority50077 Yolo City of Woodland Bike Lanes (Class II) Spring Lake Area Collector 2 from East of Meikle to HWY 113 Spring Lake Specific Plan TBD Higher Priority50027 Yolo City of Woodland Bike Lanes (Class II) West Woodland Avenue from Mariposa St to CR98 City of Woodland Bicycle Transportation Plan $200,000 Medium Priority50028 Yolo City of Woodland Bike Lanes (Class II) Mariposa St from Beamer St to Kentucky City of Woodland Bicycle Transportation Plan $200,000 Medium Priority50029 Yolo City of Woodland Bike Lanes (Class II) Kentucky Avenue from Cottonwood to CR98 City of Woodland Bicycle Transportation Plan $200,000 Medium Priority50030 Yolo City of Woodland Bike Lanes (Class II) Kentucky Avenue from West St to Harter Ave. City of Woodland Bicycle Transportation Plan $200,000 Medium Priority50031 Yolo City of Woodland Bike Lanes (Class II) Woodland Avenue from Freeman St to College St. City of Woodland Bicycle Transportation Plan $200,000 Medium Priority50032 Yolo City of Woodland Bike Lanes (Class II) Second St. from Marshall to Lincoln Ave. City of Woodland Bicycle Transportation Plan $200,000 Medium Priority50033 Yolo City of Woodland Bike Lanes (Class II) College St from Gibson to Bartlett City of Woodland Bicycle Transportation Plan $200,000 Medium Priority50034 Yolo City of Woodland Bike Lanes (Class II) E. Gum Avenue from East St to Stetson City of Woodland Bicycle Transportation Plan $200,000 Medium Priority50035 Yolo City of Woodland Bike Lanes (Class II) Armfield Avenue from East St to E Street City of Woodland Bicycle Transportation Plan $200,000 Medium Priority50036 Yolo City of Woodland Bike Lanes (Class II) Matmor Avenue from Lemen to Beamer City of Woodland Bicycle Transportation Plan $200,000 Medium Priority50037 Yolo City of Woodland Bike Lanes (Class II) Commerce Avenue from East St to Harter Ave. City of Woodland Bicycle Transportation Plan $200,000 Medium Priority50038 Yolo City of Woodland Bike Lanes (Class II) Fortna Avenue from East St to Harter Ave. City of Woodland Bicycle Transportation Plan $200,000 Medium Priority50039 Yolo City of Woodland Bike Lanes (Class II) Harter Avenue from E. Kentucky to East St. City of Woodland Bicycle Transportation Plan $200,000 Medium Priority50040 Yolo City of Woodland Bike Lanes (Class II) Beamer St from East End to CR102 City of Woodland Bicycle Transportation Plan $200,000 Medium Priority50041 Yolo City of Woodland Bike Lanes (Class II) Hanson Way from CR102 to Main St. City of Woodland Bicycle Transportation Plan $200,000 Medium Priority50042 Yolo City of Woodland Bike Lanes (Class II) E. Gum from CR101 to Joyce Ct. City of Woodland Bicycle Transportation Plan $200,000 Medium Priority50043 Yolo City of Woodland Bike Lanes (Class II) Kincheloe from Maxwell Ave. to N. End City of Woodland Bicycle Transportation Plan $200,000 Medium Priority50044 Yolo City of Woodland Bike Lanes (Class II) Walnut St from Beamer to Kentucky City of Woodland Bicycle Transportation Plan $200,000 Medium Priority50142 Yolo City of Woodland Bike Lanes (Class II) Kentucky Avenue from Cottonwood to West .5 miles City of Woodland Bicycle Transportation Plan $200,000 Medium Priority50017 Yolo City of Woodland Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) Walnut St. from Kentucky Ave. to Beamer St. City of Woodland Bicycle Transportation Plan 44,330 Medium Priority50018 Yolo City of Woodland Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) Thomas St. from E. Main St. to E. Gum Ave City of Woodland Bicycle Transportation Plan $44,330 Medium Priority50019 Yolo City of Woodland Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) Harter Avenue from E. Kentucky Ave. to E. Beamer St City of Woodland Bicycle Transportation Plan $44,330 Medium Priority50020 Yolo City of Woodland Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) E. Oak Avenue from Thomas St. to Matmor Rd. City of Woodland Bicycle Transportation Plan $44,330 Medium Priority50021 Yolo City of Woodland Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) Court St. from Ashley Ave. to Sonoma Way City of Woodland Bicycle Transportation Plan $44,330 Medium Priority50022 Yolo City of Woodland Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) Churchill Downs Avenue from Pioneer Ave. to East St. City of Woodland Bicycle Transportation Plan $44,330 Medium Priority50023 Yolo City of Woodland Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) E. Oak Avenue from East St. to Thomas St. City of Woodland Bicycle Transportation Plan $44,330 Medium Priority50025 Yolo City of Woodland Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) North St. from Fifth St to Fifth St. City of Woodland Bicycle Transportation Plan $44,330 Medium Priority50026 Yolo City of Woodland Bike Lanes (Class II) / Bike Route (Class III) Lemen St. from East St. to Matmor Rd. City of Woodland Bicycle Transportation Plan $44,330 Medium Priority50045 Yolo City of Woodland Bike Route (Class III) California St from Main to Beamer St. City of Woodland Bicycle Transportation Plan $75,000 Medium Priority50046 Yolo City of Woodland Bike Route (Class III) Clover St from California to Third St. City of Woodland Bicycle Transportation Plan $75,000 Medium Priority50047 Yolo City of Woodland Bike Route (Class III) Southwood from Ashley Ave to McKinley Ave. City of Woodland Bicycle Transportation Plan $75,000 Medium Priority50048 Yolo City of Woodland Bike Route (Class III) Woodland Avenue from College St to E. End City of Woodland Bicycle Transportation Plan $75,000 Medium Priority50049 Yolo City of Woodland Bike Route (Class III) Walnut St from Cross to Beamer City of Woodland Bicycle Transportation Plan $75,000 Medium Priority50050 Yolo City of Woodland Bike Route (Class III) College St from Bartlett to Court St City of Woodland Bicycle Transportation Plan $75,000 Medium Priority50051 Yolo City of Woodland Bike Route (Class III) College St from Clover to Beamer City of Woodland Bicycle Transportation Plan $75,000 Medium Priority50052 Yolo City of Woodland Bike Route (Class III) Coloma Wy from S. End to Granada City of Woodland Bicycle Transportation Plan $75,000 Medium Priority50053 Yolo City of Woodland Bike Route (Class III) Second St from Granada to Marshall City of Woodland Bicycle Transportation Plan $75,000 Medium Priority50054 Yolo City of Woodland Bike Route (Class III) Third St from Court St to Woodland Ave City of Woodland Bicycle Transportation Plan $75,000 Medium Priority50055 Yolo City of Woodland Bike Route (Class III) Fifth St from Gum to Main St City of Woodland Bicycle Transportation Plan $75,000 Medium Priority50056 Yolo City of Woodland Bike Route (Class III) Fifth St from Court St to Beamer St City of Woodland Bicycle Transportation Plan $75,000 Medium Priority50057 Yolo City of Woodland Bike Route (Class III) Cross St from West to Sixth City of Woodland Bicycle Transportation Plan $75,000 Medium Priority50058 Yolo City of Woodland Bike Route (Class III) Bartlett from McKinley to Third City of Woodland Bicycle Transportation Plan $75,000 Medium Priority50059 Yolo City of Woodland Bike Route (Class III) Granada from College to Coloma City of Woodland Bicycle Transportation Plan $75,000 Medium Priority50060 Yolo City of Woodland Bike Route (Class III) Marshall from College to Fifth City of Woodland Bicycle Transportation Plan $75,000 Medium Priority50061 Yolo City of Woodland Bike Route (Class III) Gum from Fifth to East City of Woodland Bicycle Transportation Plan $75,000 Medium Priority50062 Yolo City of Woodland Bike Route (Class III) Main from Third to Matmor City of Woodland Bicycle Transportation Plan $75,000 Medium Priority50063 Yolo City of Woodland Bike Route (Class III) Lemen from East to Matmor City of Woodland Bicycle Transportation Plan $75,000 Medium Priority50064 Yolo City of Woodland Bike Route (Class III) Cannery from Matmor to Industrial City of Woodland Bicycle Transportation Plan $75,000 Medium Priority50065 Yolo City of Woodland Bike Route (Class III) Industrial from Cannery to Main City of Woodland Bicycle Transportation Plan $75,000 Medium Priority50066 Yolo City of Woodland Bike Route (Class III) Ogden from Brannigan to Gibson City of Woodland Bicycle Transportation Plan $75,000 Medium Priority50067 Yolo City of Woodland Bike Route (Class III) East from Gibson to S. Limits City of Woodland Bicycle Transportation Plan $75,000 Medium Priority

50068 Yolo City of Woodland Combined Projects Yolo Short Line RR parallel to Main St. from Pioneer Ave. to East St. City of Woodland Bicycle Transportation Plan $1,500,000 Higher Priority

50072 Yolo City of Woodland Over/Undercrossing High Priorityway113 overcrossing from CR101 to Matmor along Farmer's Central City of Woodland Bicycle Transportation Plan TBD Higher Priority50069 Yolo City of Woodland Over/Undercrossing Overcrossing just south of County Road 25 City of Woodland Bicycle Transportation Plan $2,270,000 Lower Priority

Page 50 of 59

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

EAST

ST

E MAIN ST

COUN

TY R

OAD

98

COUN

TY R

OAD

102

WEST

ST

PIONE

ER AV

E

N EA

ST ST

COUNTY ROAD 25A

COLL

EGE S

T

E GIBSON RD

E BEAMER ST

E GUM AVE

ASHL

EY AV

E

THIR

D ST

MAIN ST

COTT

ONW

OOD

ST

COURT ST

CROSS ST

W MAIN ST

E KENTUCKY AVE

GIBSON RD

BEAMER ST

MATM

OR R

D

W CROSS ST

HWY 16

W GIBSON RD

W BEAMER ST

LINCOLN AVE

COUN

TY R

OAD

99

HARR

Y LOR

ENZO

AVE

KENTUCKY AVE

W LINCOLN AVE

W COURT ST

FARNHAM AVE

CALIF

ORNI

A ST

W EL DORADO DR

W KENTUCKY AVE

W WOODLAND AVECO

LOMA

WAY

EL DORADO DR

N W

EST S

T

LEMEN AVE

BRANIGAN AVE

BOUR

N DR

N CO

LLEG

E ST

COUNTY ROAD 24

FARMERS CENTRAL RD

E HERITAGE PKY

NORTH ST

COUNTY ROAD 20

GUM AVE

INDU

STRI

AL W

AY

COUN

TY R

OAD

99

Woodland Proposed Multi-Use PathProposed Bike LaneProposed Bike Route

! SchoolsCities



Page 51 of 59



UC DAVIS

50082 Yolo UC Davis Bike Lanes (Class II) UC DavisUC Davis Bikeway and Transit Network Study Focus Area 3

UC Davis Bikeway and Transit Network Study TBD Medium Priority

50083 Yolo UC Davis Combined Projects UC DavisUC Davis/Downtown Davis to West Village Bike and Pedestrian Corridor

UC Davis Bikeway and Transit Network Study TBD Higher Priority

50087 Yolo UC Davis Combined Projects UC DavisUC Davis Bikeway and Transit Network Study Focus Area 4

UC Davis Bikeway and Transit Network Study TBD Lower Priority





50088 Yolo UC Davis Support Facilities UC Davis Bike Parking Additions and Replacement UC Davis Bikeway and Transit Network Study TBD Medium Priority50089 Yolo UC Davis Support Facilities UC Davis Bike Parking Additions and Replacement UC Davis Bikeway and Transit Network Study Medium Priority




YOLO COUNTY50092 Yolo Yolo County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Along Cache Creek Woodland to Cache Creek Regional Park 10 miles Cache Creek Resource Management Plan TBD Lower Priority

50093 Yolo Yolo County Multi‐use Path (Class I)Delta Ecosystem Trail ‐ Deep water ship channel

Along levees of the deep water ship channel between W. Sacramento and Solano County

14 Yolo County Bicycle Transportation Plan TBD Lower Priority

50131 Yolo Yolo County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Clarksburg Branch Line Rail Trail West Sacramento to Pumphouse Road 5 Yolo County Bicycle Transportation Plan TBD Lower Priority

50138 Yolo Yolo County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Russell Boulevard Bike Pathfrom Davis City limits to County Road 95A, rehabilitate pavement

7 Yolo County Bicycle Transportation Plan TBD Medium Priority

50127 Yolo Yolo County Multi‐use Path (Class I) & Bike Lanes (Class II) Between Davis and Woodland Connect Low Volume Frontage Roads along SR113 6.2 Yolo County Bicycle Transportation Plan 5,500,000 Higher Priority

50132 Yolo Yolo County Multi‐use Path (Class I) & Bike Lanes (Class II)Interstate 80 Bikeway, County Road 32A

County Road 105 to West Sacramento, improve existing facilities

5.25 Yolo County Bicycle Transportation Plan TBD Lower Priority

50140 Yolo Yolo County Multi‐use Path (Class I) or Bike Lanes (Class II) County Road 95A from Russell Blvd bike path to Solano County line 0.8 Yolo County Bicycle Transportation Plan TBD Medium Priority

50141 Yolo Yolo County Multi‐use Path (Class I) or Bike Lanes (Class II) County Road 22 from Woodland to West Sacramento 12 Yolo County Bicycle Transportation Plan TBD Medium Priority

50134 Yolo Yolo County Bike Lanes (Class II) County Road 21A from Fremont Street to Esparto Middle School 0.25 Yolo County Bicycle Transportation Plan 300,000 Higher Priority

50135 Yolo Yolo County Bike Lanes (Class II) County Road 98 from Russell Blvd bike path to Hutchison Drive 0.5 Yolo County Bicycle Transportation Plan 425,000 Higher Priority

50136 Yolo Yolo County Bike Lanes (Class II) County Road 99 from County Road 29 to County Road 31 2 Yolo County Bicycle Transportation Plan 1,600,000 Higher Priority

50103 Yolo Yolo County Bike Lanes (Class II) County Road 89 & Highway 16Lanes along Co. Rd. 89 & Hwy. 16 connecting Winters to Madison and Esparto

9.5 Yolo County Bicycle Transportation Plan TBD Lower Priority

50104 Yolo Yolo County Bike Lanes (Class II) County Road 99 W from CR18C to Colusa County line 17.6 Yolo County Bicycle Transportation Plan TBD Lower Priority

50105 Yolo Yolo County Bike Lanes (Class II)County Road 24, County Road 90A, Highway 16

Lanes along Co. Rd. 24, Co. Rd. 90A, and Hwy 16 from Woodland to Madison

7 Yolo County Bicycle Transportation Plan TBD Lower Priority

50130 Yolo Yolo County Bike Lanes (Class II) County Road 99, County Road 18 from Woodland City limits to CR99W 2.8 Yolo County Bicycle Transportation Plan TBD Lower Priority50133 Yolo Yolo County Bike Lanes (Class II) Chiles Road Davis City Limits to I‐80 Bike Path 2.26 Yolo County Bicycle Transportation Plan TBD Lower Priority50106 Yolo Yolo County Bike Lanes (Class II) County Road 98 From Woodland City limits to Co. Rd. 31 7.9 Yolo County Bicycle Transportation Plan TBD Medium Priority

50128 Yolo Yolo County Bike Lanes (Class II) County Road 104 from Davis city limits to Grasslands Regional Park 3 Yolo County Bicycle Transportation Plan TBD Medium Priority

50129 Yolo Yolo County Bike Lanes (Class II) State Route 113from County Road 27 to County Road 25A, open shoulder to bicycles

1.75 Yolo County Bicycle Transportation Plan TBD Medium Priority

50137 Yolo Yolo County Bike Lanes (Class II) County Road 102 from Davis City limits to approximately 3000' north 0.06 Yolo County Bicycle Transportation Plan TBD Medium Priority

50139 Yolo Yolo County Bike Lanes (Class II) South River Road, Netherlands Road West Sacramento to County Line 27 Yolo County Bicycle Transportation Plan TBD Medium Priority

50101 Yolo Yolo County Bike Route (Class III) Highway 16 From Woodland to Colusa County Line 40 Yolo County Bicycle Transportation Plan TBD Lower Priority50102 Yolo Yolo County Bike Route (Class III) Highway 128 From Winters to County Line 8 Yolo County Bicycle Transportation Plan TBD Lower Priority

50090 Yolo Yolo County Combined Projects Town of EspartoState Route 16 Traffic calming ‐ Provide pedestrian facilities and enhancements in downtown Esparto to improve safety, and access to CBD of Esparto

Esparto Main Street Revitalization Plan TBD Medium Priority

50091 Yolo Yolo County Pedestrian Upgrade Town of EspartoProvide sidewalks for access to Esparto Middle & High Schools

Esparto General Plan TBD Higher Priority

Page 52 of 59

HWY 16

GARD

EN H

WY

FRAN

KLIN

BLV

D

JEFF

ERSO

N BL

VD

COUNTY ROAD 27

H ST

COUN

TY R

OAD

102

RUSSELL BLVD

E LEVEE RD

HWY 1

13

Z LINE

RD

HWY 128

RIEGO RD

FLORIN RD

RIVER RD

Q ST

COUN

TY R

OAD

98

SANKEY RD

BRUC

EVILL

E RD

U ST

S RIVER RD

50 EB

COUNTY ROAD 31

W ELVERTA RD

COUN

TY R

OAD

95

N STP ST50 W B

COUNTY ROAD 14

O LD RIVER RD

COUNTY ROAD 23COUNTY ROAD 24

COUNTY ROAD 19

COUNTY ROAD 17

RIO LINDA BLVD

FREE

PORT

BLV

D

COUNTY ROAD 26

STOCKTON BLVD

EAST

ST

COUNTY ROAD 13

SIEVERS RD

DEL PASO RD

COUN

TY R

OAD

87

I ST

TREMONT RD

E ST

BELL

ST

D ST

POWE

R LIN

E RD

SAN JUAN RD

W ST

COUN

TY R

OAD

85

FARM

RD

COUNTY ROAD 25

FRUITRIDGE RD

2ND

STW ELKHORN BLVD

NATOMAS RD

DRY CR EEK RD

PEDR

ICK

RD

BELL AVE

PRIVA

TE S

T

CURR

EY R

D

COUNTY RO AD 29

14TH AVE

E MAIN ST

CENTRAL AVE

TRUXEL RD

5TH

ST

COUNTY ROAD 99W

G ST

COUNTY RO

AD 11

7

R ST

RIVERSID

E BLV

D

COUNTY ROAD 15

COUN

TY R

OAD

96N LEVE E RD

16TH

ST

POWE

RLIN

E RD

LOCU

ST R

D

V ST

O ST

FIFTH ST

LEVEE RDPRIV AT E RD

MACK RD

47TH AVE

COUNTY ROAD 25A

DEL PASO BLVD

POC K ET R D

SOUT

H RI

VER RD

20TH ST

2ND AVE

COURTLAND RD

24TH

ST

EL C

ENTR

O RD

BASE LINE RD

COUNTY ROAD 124

MET RO P KY

CENTER PKY

MACE

BLVD

COUN

TY R

OAD

97

SILVE YVILLE RD

S BRE

WER

RD

COUNTY ROAD 29A

WEST

ST

COUNTY ROAD 22

ARDEN WAY

C ST

T ST

COUNTY ROAD 78A

COUN

TY R

OAD

90A

COUN

TY R

OAD

103

WILLOW POINT RD

F ST

NETH

ERLA

NDS R

D

GL ORIA DR

VAUGHN RD

COUN

TY R

OAD

93

COUNTY ROAD 28H

W 6T

H ST

COUN

TY R

OAD

106

OLD

DA

VIS RD

WAU

KEENA RD

COUNTY ROAD 7 8

N COURTLAND RD

PALL

ADAY

RD

HOO D FRANKLIN RD

LINDEN RD

COUN

TY R

OAD

90

ALAM

EDA A

VE

S IM S RD

DAVIS RD

SOUTH

PORT PKYW COVELL BLVD

COUN

TY R

OAD

88

EARH

ART D

R

BECK

ER R

D

N B ST

E COVELL BLVD

ROBBEN RD

N EA

ST ST

COUN

TY R

OAD

100A

COUNTY ROAD 155

8TH AVE

BUCK

EYE

RD

COUN

TY R

OAD

101

ASHL

EY AV

E

S LEVEE RD

ARENA BLVD

COLL

EGE

ST

RALEY BLVD

COUN

TY R

OAD

94B

THISSELL RD

BABE

L SLO

UGH RD

COUNTY ROAD

92B PLEASANT GRO VE RD

LON E TREE R D

SORE

NTO

RD

RANCH RD

E GUM AVE

RUNGE RD

CAMPBE LL RD

PUTAH CREEK RD

UNN AMED RD

CLARKSBURG AVE

EL VE

RANO

AVE

COUNTY ROAD 15B

COUNTY ROAD 105

J ST

MEADOWVIEW RD

N PARK DR

MAIN AVE

VALLEY HI DR

TULE

RD

MABRY DR

POINT PLEASANT RD

COUNTY ROAD 28

COUNTY ROAD 20

COUN

TY R

OAD

89 COUN

TY R

OAD

99

COUN

TY R

OAD

94

COUNTY ROAD 30

PI NELL ST

HUTCHISON DR

45TH

ST

S ST

65TH AVE

ASCOT AVE

W RIVER DR

COUNTY ROAD 32B

REED AVE

MAIN ST

B ST

COUN

TY R

OAD

100

STONE BLVD

COUNTY ROAD 18C

BEACH LAKE RD

COUN

TY R

OAD

92E

COUN

TY R

OAD

104

GARROD DR 21ST AVE

OTIS

AVE

CORE RD

COUNTY ROAD 18

J PKY

W Q ST

JIBBOOM ST

TEAL RD

W U ST

MATINA DR

COUNTY ROAD 18A

CARL

IN AV

E

COUNTY ROAD 79

OLMO

LN

COUN

TY R

OAD

91A

COUNTY ROAD 82

DEL R

IO R

D

TULE LAKE RD

W EIGHTH ST

ABBEY ST

COUNTY ROAD 70

KEGL

E DR

L STW BEAMER ST

CAPAY ST

MIEK

LE AV

E

PRIT

CHARD AVE

HARBOUR POINT DR

ELW

YN AV

E

KENM

AR R

D

AVIAT

ION

DR

71ST

ST

NATIO

NAL D

R

GARN

ETT L

N

COUNTY ROAD 16

BEST RANCH RD

CLAY

ST

ROSE RD

SUN

RIVE

R DR

52ND AVE

MILLS RD

AMER

ICAN

AVE

9TH AVE

4TH

ST

REDDING AVE

15TH ST

STEINER DR

A ST

K ST

56TH AVE

53RD

ST

TAYL

OR ST

41ST AVECOUN

TY R

OAD

97

C ST

S RIVER RD

HWY 16

COUNTY ROAD 25

HWY 16

COUNTY ROAD 16

I ST

RIVER

RD

COUNTY ROAD 14

COUN

TY R

OAD

90

COUN

TY R

OAD

104

B STCOUNTY ROAD 29

RI V E R RD

2ND

ST

RIVE

R RD

I ST

COUNTY ROAD 17

COUN

TY R

OAD

104

COUNTY ROAD 17

PRIVA

TE ST

BECKER RD

COUNTY ROAD 20

COUNTY ROAD 25

SORE

NTO

RD

Continues to county line



!

!!!

HWY 16COUNTY ROAD 23

I 505

SBI 5

05 N

B

COUN

TY R

OAD

87

MAIN ST

COUNTY ROAD 22 CAPAY ST

COUN

TY R

OAD

89

OAKD

ALE R

ANCH

LN

TUTT

ST

HWY 16HWY 16

Esparto

Yolo County Proposed Multi-Use PathProposed Bike LaneProposed Bike Route

! SchoolsCities

Existing Multi-Use Path (Class I)

Existing Bike Route (Class III)Existing Bike Lane (Class II width)


Page 53 of 59



YOLO COUNTY: MULTI-AGENCY50079 Yolo

Multi-Agency: Yolo County & City of Woodland

Multi-use Path (Class I) Rails to Trails: Sierra Northern Rail Trail

Between Woodland and West Sacramento 12 Yolo County Bicycle Transportation Plan TBD Lower Priority

50078 YoloMulti-Agency: Yolo County, City of Davis, & City of Woodland

Multi-use Path (Class I) Between Davis and WoodlandBikeway between Davis and Woodland: Alignment as per 2009 Alternative Transportation Corridor feasibility study.

6.7 miles Yolo County Bicycle Transportation Plan $9,640,000 Higher Priority




CITY OF MARYSVILLE60079 Yuba City of Marysville Combined Projects City of Marysville

Connect Bicycle system to new 5th Street Bridge Bike Path

TBD

60080 Yuba City of Marysville Combined Projects City of Marysville Upgrade bicycle lane signage and markings TBD

60081 Yuba City of Marysville Combined Projects Around Rideout HospitalNew bicycle lanes and bike racks around Rideout Hospital

TBD

60078 Yuba City of Marysville Planning City of Marysville Update Bicycle/Pedestrian Master Plan $100,000

Page 54 of 59

!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

HWY 2

0

N BEALE RD

SIMPSON LN

JACK

SLO

UGH

RD

LINDA AVE

HAMMON

TON-

SMAR

TVILLE RD

GARD

EN HW

Y

GARDEN AVERIVERSIDE DR

LINDHURST AVEARBOGA RDFE

ATHER

RIVER BL

VD

RUPERT AVE

AVONDALE AVE

N BEALE RD

Marysville Proposed Multi-Use PathProposed Bike LaneProposed Bike Route

! SchoolsCities





CITY OF WHEATLAND

60089 Yuba City of Wheatland Combined Projects City of WheatlandSafe Routes to School project: Construct sidewalks, curb and gutter, and curb ramps, install crosswalks


60090 Yuba City of Wheatland Combined Projects Wheatland RoadConstruct a bike lane; upgrade pedestrian path, curbs, and driveways from G Street to Wheatland Park Dr.


60094 Yuba City of Wheatland Planning City of Wheatland

Bicycle Master Plan, Phase 2: Utilizing the information from Phase I, Phase II would consists of the preparation of a fully executed Bicycle Master Plan, which would include an introduction, goals and objectives, background information, existing bicycle facilities, proposed improvements, and implementation (including prioritization of improvements, cost estimates, and funding sources).

N/A City of Wheatland General Plan $75,000

Page 55 of 59

!

!

!

!

!

HWY 65

N HWY 65

D ST

SPEN

CEVILL

E RD

WHEATLAND RD

WHEATLAND RD

HWY 65

Wheatland Proposed Multi-Use PathProposed Bike LaneProposed Bike Route

! SchoolsCities





YUBA COUNTY60001 Yuba Yuba County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Linda Class 1 Trail

Linda Class I Trail from Riverside Avenue to Shad Road

2012 Yuba County Bikeway Master Plan $250,000

60002 Yuba Yuba County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Linda Class 1 TrailLinda Class I Trail from Shad Road to Avondale Avenue


60003 Yuba Yuba County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Bear River BikewayBear River levee from Wheatland City to Lake Camp Far West

2009 County of Yuba General Plan Update TBD

60004 Yuba Yuba County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Feather River BikewayFeather River Levee from SR 70 at the Yuba River Bridge to SR 70 at the Bear River Bridge

2012 Yuba County Bikeway Master Plan TBD

60005 Yuba Yuba County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Yuba CountyYuba County Bicycle & Pedestrian Transportation Plan

Yuba County Bicycle & Pedestrian Transportation Plan TBD

60007 Yuba Yuba County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Linda Class 1 TrailLinda Class I Trail from Avondale Avenue to Simpson Lane


60075 Yuba Yuba County Multi‐use Path (Class I) Rails to Trails: Yuba County ‐ Yuba County Bicycle & Pedestrian Transportation Plan TBD

60087 Yuba Yuba County Multi‐use Path (Class I)Sacramento Northern (former railroad alignment)

Bear River levee to Algodon Road 2012 Yuba County Bikeway Master Plan $3,000,000

60088 Yuba Yuba County Multi‐use Path (Class I)Sacramento Northern (former railroad alignment)

Feather River levee to Algodon Road

60008 Yuba Yuba County Bike Lanes (Class II) Arboga Road. Erle Rd. to Broadway Road. Yuba‐Sutter Bikeway Master Plan/GPU TBD60009 Yuba Yuba County Bike Lanes (Class II) Lindhurst Avenue Olivehurst Ave. to Scale Ave. South Half Yuba‐Sutter Bikeway Master Plan $350,000

60010 Yuba Yuba County Bike Lanes (Class II) Yuba County ‐ Yuba County Bicycle & Pedestrian Transportation Plan TBD

60011 Yuba Yuba County Bike Lanes (Class II) Yuba County ‐ Yuba County Bicycle & Pedestrian Transportation Plan TBD

60012 Yuba Yuba County Bike Lanes (Class II) Hammonton‐Smartsville Road Simpson Lane to Griffith Avenue 2012 Yuba County Bikeway Master Plan TBD60014 Yuba Yuba County Bike Lanes (Class II) Honcut Creek Bridge Los Verjeles Road at Butte Co. line 2009 County of Yuba General Plan Update TBD60020 Yuba Yuba County Bike Lanes (Class II) Plumas Arboga Road Algodon Road to Forty Mile Road 2009 County of Yuba General Plan Update TBD60024 Yuba Yuba County Bike Lanes (Class II) Woodruff Lane SR 70 to SR 20 2009 County of Yuba General Plan Update TBD60025 Yuba Yuba County Bike Lanes (Class II) Yuba River Bridge SR 70 over Yuba River 2009 County of Yuba General Plan Update TBD60026 Yuba Yuba County Bike Lanes (Class II) Griffith Avenue Erle Rd. to Hammonton‐Smartsville Rd. 2009 County of Yuba General Plan Update TBD60027 Yuba Yuba County Bike Lanes (Class II) Erle Road Arboga Rd. to Virginia Rd. 2009 County of Yuba General Plan Update TBD60028 Yuba Yuba County Bike Lanes (Class II) Virginia Road Erle Rd. to Ostrom Rd. 2009 County of Yuba General Plan Update TBD60029 Yuba Yuba County Bike Lanes (Class II) Ostrom Road Virginia Rd. to Jasper Lane 2009 County of Yuba General Plan Update TBD60030 Yuba Yuba County Bike Lanes (Class II) South Beale Road SR 65 to Ostrom Rd. 2009 County of Yuba General Plan Update TBD60031 Yuba Yuba County Bike Lanes (Class II) Arboga Road/River Oaks Blvd. Algodon Rd to Broadway Rd 2012 Yuba County Bikeway Master Plan TBD60032 Yuba Yuba County Bike Lanes (Class II) Plumas Arboga Road Arboga Rd. to Algodon Rd. 2012 Yuba County Bikeway Master Plan TBD60033 Yuba Yuba County Bike Lanes (Class II) Algodon Road Plumas Arboga Rd to Feather River Blvd 2012 Yuba County Bikeway Master Plan TBD60034 Yuba Yuba County Bike Lanes (Class II) Forty Mile Road SR 65 to Sutter Co. line 2009 County of Yuba General Plan Update TBD60035 Yuba Yuba County Bike Lanes (Class II) Seventh Avenue Arboga Road to Powerline Road 2012 Yuba County Bikeway Master Plan TBD60036 Yuba Yuba County Bike Lanes (Class II) Fruitland Road Honcut Rd to Marysville Road 2009 County of Yuba General Plan Update TBD60040 Yuba Yuba County Bike Lanes (Class II) Alicia Avenue Feather River Blvd to Riverside Avenue 2012 Yuba County Bikeway Master Plan TBD60041 Yuba Yuba County Bike Lanes (Class II) Cedar Lane Alicia Avenue to Garden Avenue TBD60043 Yuba Yuba County Bike Lanes (Class II) Pasado Road Alicia Avenue to Arboga Rd 2012 Yuba County Bikeway Master Plan TBD

60082 Yuba Yuba County Bike Lanes (Class II) Avondale Avenue Hammonton‐Smartsville Rd to North Beale Road 2012 Yuba County Bikeway Master Plan $2,100,000

60083 Yuba Yuba County Bike Lanes (Class II) Feather River Blvd. North Beale Rd to Grand Avenue 2012 Yuba County Bikeway Master Plan TBD60084 Yuba Yuba County Bike Lanes (Class II) McGowan Parkway Arboga Road to Rancho Road 2012 Yuba County Bikeway Master Plan TBD60037 Yuba Yuba County Bike Route (Class III) Camp Far West Road Spenceville Rd to Blackford Road 2012 Yuba County Bikeway Master Plan TBD60038 Yuba Yuba County Bike Route (Class III) Blackford Road Camp Far West Rd to Placer Co. line 2012 Yuba County Bikeway Master Plan TBD60039 Yuba Yuba County Bike Route (Class III) Riverside Avenue Feather River Blvd to Alicia Avenue 2012 Yuba County Bikeway Master Plan TBD60042 Yuba Yuba County Bike Route (Class III) Garden Avenue Feather River Blvd to Cedar Lane 2012 Yuba County Bikeway Master Plan TBD60015 Yuba Yuba County Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Jack Slough Road Woodruff Lane to Marysville City line 2012 Yuba County Bikeway Master Plan TBD60016 Yuba Yuba County Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Jasper Lane Ostrom to Spenceville Road 2012 Yuba County Bikeway Master Plan TBD60017 Yuba Yuba County Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Loma Rica Road SR 20 to Marysville Road 2012 Yuba County Bikeway Master Plan TBD60018 Yuba Yuba County Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Marysville Road Spring Valley Road to Bullards Bar Dam 2012 Yuba County Bikeway Master Plan TBD60019 Yuba Yuba County Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Mathews Lane Woodruff Lane to Ramirez Road 2012 Yuba County Bikeway Master Plan TBD60021 Yuba Yuba County Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Ramirez Road SR 70 to Butte Co. line 2012 Yuba County Bikeway Master Plan TBD60022 Yuba Yuba County Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Spenceville Road Wheatland City line to Camp Far West Road 2012 Yuba County Bikeway Master Plan TBD60023 Yuba Yuba County Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder SR 20 Loma Rica Road to Spring Valley Road 2012 Yuba County Bikeway Master Plan TBD60044 Yuba Yuba County Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Marysville Road Bullards Bar Dam to SR 49 2009 County of Yuba General Plan Update TBD60045 Yuba Yuba County Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Frenchtown Road Brownsville to Marysville Road 2009 County of Yuba General Plan Update TBD60046 Yuba Yuba County Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Willow Glen Road Brownsville to Marysville Road 2009 County of Yuba General Plan Update TBD60047 Yuba Yuba County Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Spring Valley Road Marysville Road to SR 20 2009 County of Yuba General Plan Update TBD60048 Yuba Yuba County Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Fruitland Road Ramirez Road to Honcut Road 2009 County of Yuba General Plan Update TBD60049 Yuba Yuba County Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Dolan Harding Marysville Road to Marysville Road 2009 County of Yuba General Plan Update TBD60050 Yuba Yuba County Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Peoria Road Marysville Road to SR 20 2009 County of Yuba General Plan Update TBD

60051 Yuba Yuba County Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Timbuctoo‐Smartsville Parks Bar Bridge at SR 20 to Smartsville at SR 20 2009 County of Yuba General Plan Update TBD

60052 Yuba Yuba County Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Yuba County ‐ Yuba County Bicycle & Pedestrian Transportation Plan TBD

60053 Yuba Yuba County Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Marysville Road Bullards Bar Dam to SR 49 2009 County of Yuba General Plan Update TBD60054 Yuba Yuba County Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Frenchtown Road Brownsville to Marysville Road 2009 County of Yuba General Plan Update TBD60055 Yuba Yuba County Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Willow Glen Road Brownsville to Marysville Road 2009 County of Yuba General Plan Update TBD60056 Yuba Yuba County Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Spring Valley Road Marysville Road to SR 20 2009 County of Yuba General Plan Update TBD60057 Yuba Yuba County Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Fruitland Road Ramirez Road to Honcut Road 2009 County of Yuba General Plan Update TBD

Page 56 of 59




60058 Yuba Yuba County Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Dolan Harding Marysville Road to Marysville Road 2009 County of Yuba General Plan Update TBD60059 Yuba Yuba County Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Peoria Road Marysville Road to SR 20 2009 County of Yuba General Plan Update TBD

60060 Yuba Yuba County Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Timbuctoo‐Smartsville Parks Bar Bridge at SR 20 to Smartsville at SR 20 2009 County of Yuba General Plan Update TBD

60061 Yuba Yuba County Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Feather River Blvd. Grand Avenue to River Oaks Blvd TBD60062 Yuba Yuba County Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Smartsville Road SR 20 to SR 20 2009 County of Yuba General Plan Update TBD

60063 Yuba Yuba County Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Chuck Yeager Road (Smartsville Road) Hammonton‐Smartsville Rd to Beale Air Force Base 2009 County of Yuba General Plan Update TBD

60085 Yuba Yuba County Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Hammonton‐Smartsville Road Griffith Avenue to S.R. 20 2012 Yuba County Bikeway Master Plan TBD60086 Yuba Yuba County Bike Route (Class III) / Shoulder Rancho Road McGowan Parkway to S.R. 65 2012 Yuba County Bikeway Master Plan TBD

60065 Yuba Yuba County Combined Projects 7th Avenue

Widen and reconstruct 7th Ave to provide class II bicycle lanes, curb, gutter, and sidewalk on both sides of the roadway. 0.95 mils from Powerline Rd to Arboga Rd.

Yuba‐Sutter Bikeway Master Plan TBD

60066 Yuba Yuba County Combined Projects Powerline Road

Construct class II bicycle lanes on both sides of the roadway and to construct curb, gutter and sidewalks along the western side of Powerline Rd. 1.3 miles from approx. 800' south of 11th Ave to Olivehurst Ave.

Yuba‐Sutter Bikeway Master Plan TBD

60068 Yuba Yuba County Education/Promotion Yuba County ‐ TBD

60069 Yuba Yuba County Intersections Yuba County ‐ Yuba County Bicycle & Pedestrian Transportation Plan TBD

60091 Yuba Yuba County Intersections Olivehurst Avenue / Poweline RoadIntersection and lighting improvements at Olivehurst Ave and Powerline Rd.

TBD

60092 Yuba Yuba County Intersections Olivehurst AvenueSignals on Olivehurst Ave. at McGowan Parkway and & Seventh Ave.

TBD

60070 Yuba Yuba County Over/Undercrossing State Route 70 Overcrossing at Powerline Rd. to Twain Dr. 2012 Yuba County Bikeway Master Plan $2,300,000

60071 Yuba Yuba County Over/Undercrossing State Route 70Overcrossing at Grand Avenue to Hammonton Road West

2012 Yuba County Bikeway Master Plan $1,500,000

60072 Yuba Yuba County Over/Undercrossing Yuba County Overcrossing at Cimarron Drive to east of SR 70 2012 Yuba County Bikeway Master Plan TBD

60077 Yuba Yuba County Overcrossing Yuba County River Crossings Yuba County Bicycle & Pedestrian Transportation Plan TBD

60073 Yuba Yuba County Pedestrian Upgrade Yuba County ‐ Yuba County Bicycle & Pedestrian Transportation Plan TBD

60074 Yuba Yuba County Pedestrian Upgrade Yuba County ‐ Yuba County Bicycle & Pedestrian Transportation Plan TBD

60093 Yuba Yuba County Pedestrian Upgrade North Beale Road Pedestrian components of North Beale Road Complete Street project (sidewalks, signals, landscaping/shade, lighting, etc)

TBD

Page 57 of 59

HWY 20

MARYSVILLE RD

HWY 70

HWY 49

GRAS

S VA

LLEY

HW

Y

LOMA RICA RD

ERLE RD 6TH ST

BELL RD

B STN BEALE RD

14TH ST

OSTROM RD

S BEA

LE RD

HAMMONTON-SMARTSVILLE RD

D ST

F ST

FEAT

HER

RIVE

R BL

VD

RAMIREZ RD

FRUIT

LAND

RD

C ST

HWY 65

KEMPTON RD

OREGON HILL RD

A ST

MCCOURTNEY RD

HAMMON

TON R

D

ARBO

GA R

D

SPEN

CEVILL

E RD

PEORIA RD

WILL

OW G

LEN

RD

BEAR RIVER DR

N ER

LE R

D

FRENCHTOWN RD

FORTY MILE RD

VIERRA RD

LA PO

RTE RD

DOOLITTLE DR

PATROL RD

INDIAN

A RAN

CH R

D

RANCHO RD JASPER LN

WOODRUFF LN

CHUCK YEAGER RD

DAIRY RD

SPRING VA

LLEY R

D

DANTONI RD

CAMP

FAR W

EST R

D

BIG HILL RD

VIRGINIA RDKA

RCHN

ER R

D

MATH

EWS L

N

E ST

KIMBALL LN

DRY CREEK RD

OAKLEY LN

OLD

TOLL

RD

TOWNSHIP RD

RIVER

OAK

S BLV

D

TANA

BE RD

WHEA

TLAN

D RD

GLAD

DING

RD

SISSON LN

HWY 9

9

YUBA

NEV

ADA R

D

WALNUT AVE

RIOSA RD

N ST

THOR

NHILL

TRL

RICES CROSSING RD

DALBEY RD

GRIFF

ITH AV

E

GARDEN HWY

LEACH RD

ELLIS RD

S ERL

E ST

WALDO RD

KIBBE RD

4TH

AVE

LAGU

E RD

WOLF TRL

KAPAKA LN

HILL RD

CRAMER RD

BIG BEN RD

H ST

LAKE FRANCIS RD

SIMPSON LN

LOS V

ERJE

LES

RD

N HWY 65

WALS

H LN

HOKAN LN

GALLAGHER RD

NADE

R RD

PRIVATE

SECOND ST

N FORBES RD

POWE

RLIN

E RD

STANLEY DR

INTANKO LN

LORETTA LNPENNY WAY

OLIVE

HURS

T AVE

ALICIA AVE

DORN

ES R

D

COLLINS LAKE RDKIMBERLY RD

HUBBARD RD

MERC

URY W

AY

MONARC

H TRL

WILL

IAMS R

D

E 17TH ST

THOU

SAND

OAK

S DR

S FORBES RD

COUN

TY RO

AD 10

56

REDHILL WAY

J ST

TIMBUCTOO RD

BOXW

OOD

WAY

LOOP RD

UNNA

MED

RD

COUNTRY CLUB RD

MT PLEASANT RD

PLANTZ RD

STERN LN

M ST

MORRISON RD

BUTT

E VIE

W

W HALLWOOD BLVD

THOME RD

MAIN ST

MAGNOLIA RD

DUTCH FLAT TRL

KILAGA SPRINGS RD

MANNA LN

KAMA

DA LN

DIXON

HILL

RD

MCELROY RD

JOHNSON AVE

NOBLE RD

MEARS DR

GRANT WAY

BAXTER AVE

D J P

L2227 AVE

REEDY DR

CORTEZ WAY

SWAN

SON

RD

12TH ST

HWY 70

HWY 7

0

E ST

GARDEN HWY

HWY 65

Yuba County Proposed Multi-Use PathProposed Bike LaneProposed Bike Route

! SchoolsCities



Page 58 of 59



YUBA COUNTY: MULTI-AGENCY60000 Yuba

Multi-Agency: Yuba County & City of Marysville

Overcrossing Yuba River River Crossing: State Route 70 bridge upgrade 2012 Yuba County Bikeway Master Plan TBD


Page 59 of 59



MULTI-COUNTY MULTI-AGENCY70000 Multi-County Multi-Agengy: SACOG Region Bike Share SACOG Region Regional bike share n/a n/a TBD Higher Priority70001 Multi-County Multi-Agengy: SACOG Region Planning SACOG Region Non-Capital: Regional wayfinding n/a n/a TBD Higher Priority70002 Multi-County Multi-Agengy: SACOG Region Planning SACOG Region Non-Capital: Accessibility index/map n/a n/a TBD Higher Priority70003 Multi-County Multi-Agengy: SACOG Region Planning SACOG Region Non-Capital: Stress indicator map n/a n/a TBD Higher Priority70004 Multi-County Multi-Agengy: SACOG Region Planning SACOG Region Non-Capital: Bike/ped counts n/a n/a TBD Higher Priority

70005 Multi-County Multi-Agengy: SACOG Region Planning SACOG Region Non-Capital: Dry Creek Regional network n/a n/a TBD Higher Priority


cLocAL BicycLE AND PEDESTRiAN PLANS

Many cities and counties in the region have focused recent efforts on developing new, innovative Bicycle Transportation Plans and Pedes-trian Master Plans. The proposed regional pedestrian and bikeway network defines projects planned in the region, including corridors that are of regional significance. This network was developed using local city and county plans as a framework. It also provides an un-derstanding of what is needed to build a connected system of routes and facilities to support safe and convenient bicycle and pedestrian access throughout the region. Most local jurisdictions have developed bikeway plans, or have bicycle and pedestrian facilities incorporated in their General Plan; these are listed below with adoption or publication dates.

county of El Dorado

• City of Placerville Non-Motorized Transportation Plan (November 2010)

• El Dorado County Bicycle Transportation Plan (December 2010)

• El Dorado Hills Community Services District Bikeway Master Plan (February 1995)

county of Placer

• City of Auburn Bikeway Master Plan (April 2002)

• City of Colfax Bikeway Master Plan (2008)

• City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan Update (August 2012)

• City of Rocklin General Plan (November 2010)

• City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan (2008)

• City of Roseville Pedestrian Master Plan (2011)

• Placer County Regional Bikeway Plan (September 2002)

• Town of Loomis Bikeway Master Plan (2010)

county of Sacramento

• City of Citrus Heights Bikeway Master Plan (March 2011)

• City of Elk Grove Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan (July 2004)

• City of Elk Grove Trails Master Plan (January 2007)

APPENDix

• City of Folsom Bikeway Master Plan (July 2007)

• City of Folsom Pedestrian Master Plan (2007)

• City of Galt Bicycle Transportation Plan (March 2011)

• City of Rancho Cordova Draft Bicycle Master Plan (March 2011)

• City of Sacramento Bikeway Master Plan (March 2011)

• Sacramento County Bikeway Master Plan (April 2011)

• Sacramento County Pedestrian Master Plan (2007)

counties of Sutter and yuba

• County of Sutter and City of Live Oak Bicycle Transportation Plan (2008)

• County of Yuba General Plan Update (2009)

• Yuba-Sutter Bikeway Master Plan (December 1995)

• Yuba City Bikeway Master Plan (February 2011)

county of yolo

• City of Davis Adopted Budget and General Plan (December 2007)

• City of Davis Bicycle Plan (October 2009)

• City of Davis Comprehensive Bicycle Plan (October 2006)

• West Sacramento Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Trails Master Plan (May 2013)32

• City of Winters Bikeway System Master Plan Update (February 2012)

• City of Woodland Bicycle Transportation Plan (2002)

• County of Yolo Bicycle Transportation Plan — Bicycle Routes and Priorities (December 2006)

• UC Davis Bikeway and Transit Network Study (March 2011)

32 Plan is scheduled for approval on May 8, 2013.


Sacramento Region

68

The development of the regional network is oriented toward utilitarian trips and emphasizes regional connectivity and connections to transit systems. Local routes serve many utilitarian purposes, and identifying the regional network does not imply that local sidewalks or bikeways are somehow demoted or will not be funded. The regional system may have greater significance or emphasis for decisions being made at the regional level with respect to pedestrian and bicycle transportation.

A complete list of regional projects is shown in Appendix B. This list will be amended as projects are completed and priorities change. The projects identified do not represent the entire network—only those segments that have yet to be built and are planned.

Local Plan Requirements

Local cities and counties in California must adopt Bicycle Transporta-tion Plans (BTP) consistent with State Streets and Highways Code chapter 8- section 891, in order to be eligible to apply for State Bicycle Transportation Account (BTA) funds. At this time, there is no compa-rable requirement for Pedestrian Transportation Plans, or for the pe-destrian element of combined Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plans. Once a BTP is approved by the local governing agency, the Plan must be submitted to the Regional Transportation Planning Agency (RTPA) to review the BTP for compliance with Streets and Highways Code 891.2 (a) through (k) (below) and for consistency with local and regional plans. If the BTP meets these requirements, the RTPA will send the local jurisdiction an approval letter, which must be submit-ted to Caltrans along with the Master Plan for certification. In the four-county region, local agencies submit their BTP and checklist to SACOG. In Placer County, the Placer County Transportation Plan-ning Agency is responsible for reviewing the BTPs, and in El Dorado County, the responsible agency is El Dorado County Transportation Commission.

Checklist for Bicycle Master Plan Compliance with California Streets and Highways Code 891.2:

(a) The estimated number of existing bicycle commuters in the plan area and the estimated increase in the number of bicycle commuters resulting from implementation of the plan.

(b) A map and description of existing and proposed land use and settlement patterns which shall include, but not be limited to, locations of residential neighborhoods, schools, shopping cen-ters, public buildings, and major employment centers.

(c) A map and description of existing and proposed bikeways.

(d) A map and description of existing and proposed end-of-trip bi-cycle parking facilities. These shall include, but not be limited to, parking at schools, shopping centers, public buildings, and major employment centers.

(e) A map and description of existing and proposed bicycle trans-port and parking facilities for connections with and use of other transportation modes. These shall include, but not be limited to, parking facilities at transit stops, rail and transit terminals, ferry docks and landings, park and ride lots, and provisions for transporting bicyclists and bicycles on transit or rail vehicles or ferry vessels.

(f ) A map and description of existing and proposed facilities for changing and storing clothes and equipment. These shall in-clude, but not be limited to, locker, restroom, and shower facili-ties near bicycle parking facilities.

(g) A description of bicycle safety and education programs con-ducted in the area included within the plan, efforts by the law enforcement agency having primary traffic law enforcement responsibility in the area to enforce provisions of the Vehicle Code pertaining to bicycle operation, and the resulting effect on accidents involving bicyclists.

(h) A description of the extent of citizen and community involve-ment in development of the plan, including, but not limited to, letters of support.

(i) A description of how the bicycle transportation plan has been coordinated and is consistent with other local or regional trans-portation, air quality, or energy conservation plans, including, but not limited to, programs that provide incentives for bicycle commuting.

(j) A description of the projects proposed in the plan and a listing of their priorities for implementation.

(k) A description of past expenditures for bicycle facilities and fu-ture financial needs for projects that improve safety and conve-nience for bicycle commuters in the plan area.


Local Plan Links:

El Dorado county Transportation commission

http://www.edctc.org/_bikeped.htm

Placer county Transportation Planning Agency, including the cities of Auburn, colfax,

Lincoln, Loomis, Rocklin, and Roseville

http://pctpa.net/?p=50

Sacramento county Department of Transportation

http://www.msa2.saccounty.net/transportation/Pages/Bikeways.aspx

yolo county Planning, Resources, and Public works Department

http://www.yolocounty.org/Index.aspx?page=393

city of Davis

http://cityofdavis.org/bicycles/

city of Elk grove

http://www.egplanning.org/projects/bikeway/

city of Rancho cordova

http://www.cityofranchocordova.org/Index.aspx?page=336

city of Sacramento

http://www.cityofsacramento.org/transportation/engineering/fundingalternate.html

city of west Sacramento

http://www.cityofwestsacramento.org/civica/filebank/blobdload.asp?BlobID=3790

city of woodland

http://www.cityofwoodland.org/civica/filebank/blobdload.asp?BlobID=6429

uc Davis

http://cpcr.ucdavis.edu/btns


Sacramento Region

70

DAPPENDix

TRANSiT iNfoRMATioN

tran

sit

Op

erat

ors

co

mm

un

itie

s se

rved

sum

mar

y o

f se

rvic

es P

rovi

ded

Bik

e a

cces

sib

le/

cap

acit

yc

ust

om

er

serv

ice

tele

ph

on

e n

um

ber

ur

la

dd

itio

nal

info

rmat

ion

El D

ora

do

co

un

ty

El D

ora

do

Co

un

ty T

ran

sit

El D

ora

do

Co

un

ty

(Cam

ero

n P

ark,

Po

lloc

k P

ine

s, P

lac

erv

ille

etc

.),

co

mm

ute

r se

rvic

e t

o

do

wn

tow

n S

acra

me

nto

,

loc

al, S

acra

me

nto

c

om

mu

ter,

sh

utt

les,

Dia

l-a-

Rid

e, A

DA

C

om

ple

me

nta

ry

Par

atra

nsi

t,

SAC

-ME

D N

on

E

me

rge

nc

y M

ed

ical

A

pp

oin

tme

nt

Tran

spo

rtat

ion

yes/

2 p

er

veh

icle

on

lo

cal

an

d c

om

mu

ter

rou

tes

88

8.2

46

.28

77w

ww

.eld

ora

do

tran

sit.

co

mR

ide

r A

lert

s Se

nd

Em

ail t

o:

c

om

mu

ter@

eld

ora

do

tran

sit.

co

m

wit

h “

Ad

d m

e”

in t

he

su

bje

ct

line

Pla

cer

co

un

ty

Au

bu

rn T

ran

sit

Cit

y o

f A

ub

urn

&

po

rtio

ns

of

un

inc

orp

ora

ted

Pla

ce

r C

ou

nty

loc

al d

evi

ate

d

fixe

d

yes/

2 p

er

veh

icle

5

30

.82

3.4

211

htt

p:/

/ww

w.a

ub

urn

.ca.

go

v/se

rvic

es/

Pu

blic

Wo

rks/

pw

Tran

sit.

htm

l

Lin

co

ln T

ran

sit

Cit

y o

f Li

nc

oln

, Dia

l-a-

Rid

e s

erv

ice

to

th

e C

ity

of

Ro

sevi

lle

loc

al &

Dia

l-a-

Rid

eye

s/2

pe

r ve

hic

le o

n

loc

al r

ou

te9

16.6

45.

85

76h

ttp

://w

ww

.ci.l

inc

oln

.ca.

us/

ind

ex.

cfm

?pag

e=

28

22

19

Pla

ce

r C

ou

nty

Tra

nsi

tC

itie

s o

f A

ub

urn

, C

olf

ax, L

inc

oln

, Lo

om

is, R

oc

klin

, R

ose

ville

(G

alle

ria)

& t

he

c

om

mu

nit

y o

f G

ran

ite

B

ay

loc

al, c

om

mu

ter,

D

ial-

a-R

ide

yes/

2 p

er

veh

icle

on

lo

cal

an

d c

om

mu

ter

53

0.8

85.

BU

SS o

r

916

.78

4.6

177

TD

D H

ear

ing

Im

pai

red

: 5

30

.74

5.8

732

htt

p:/

/ww

w.p

lac

er.

ca.

go

v/D

ep

artm

en

ts/W

ork

s/Tr

ansi

t/P

CT.

asp

x

Sen

iors

Fir

st —

fu

nd

ed

by

We

ste

rn

Pla

ce

r C

on

solid

ate

d

Tran

spo

rtat

ion

Se

rvic

es

Ag

en

cy

We

ste

rn P

lac

er

Co

un

ty,

Au

bu

rn a

rea,

Ro

sevi

lle

are

a an

d S

acra

me

nto

AD

A/D

ial-

a-R

ide

- n

o w

he

el c

hai

rs o

r o

xyg

en

fo

r D

oo

r to

Do

or

rid

es

no

Se

nio

rs F

irst

1.

80

0.8

78.9

22

2

He

alth

Exp

ress

: 1-

80

0.8

78.9

22

2,

53

0.8

89

.95

00

ext

. 2

20

or

53

0.8

87.

743

3

ww

w.s

en

iors

firs

t.o

rgFo

r D

oo

r to

Do

or

serv

ice

ne

ed

to

cal

l 3

bu

sin

ess

day

s in

ad

van

ce

of

app

oin

tme

nt,

w

ee

kday

tri

ps

on

ly, D

oo

r to

Do

or

is

do

nat

ion

bas

ed

Cal

l: A

ub

urn

are

a 5

30

-8

89

-95

00

ext

. 20

1 o

r R

ose

ville

are

a 9

16-7

82

-42

02

Ro

sevi

lle T

ran

sit

Cit

y o

f R

ose

ville

: Fi

xed

R

ou

te a

nd

Dia

l-A

-Rid

e

(co

nn

ec

ts S

acra

me

nto

an

d P

lac

er

Co

un

tie

s);

to

do

wn

tow

n S

acra

me

nto

loc

al fi

xed

ro

ute

, D

ial-

a-R

ide

, an

d

co

mm

ute

r

rac

ks o

n a

ll fi

xed

ro

ute

an

d c

om

mu

te b

use

s (2

/ve

hic

le)

916

.774

.52

93

Or

53

0.7

45.

575

7h

ttp

://w

ww

.ro

sevi

lle.c

a.u

s/tr

ansp

ort

atio

n/

rose

ville

_tr

ansi

t/d

efa

ult

.asp

Sac

ram

ento

co

un

ty

CSU

S H

orn

et

Shu

ttle

CSU

S c

amp

us

and

ar

eas

imm

ed

iate

ly

surr

ou

nd

ing

th

e c

amp

us

w/i

n 5

mi.

rad

ius

loc

al &

in

terc

amp

us

shu

ttle

ye

s/2

pe

r ve

hic

le

916

.278

.54

83

htt

p:/

/ww

w.c

sus.

ed

u/a

ba/

uta

ps/

Ho

rne

t-Sh

utt

le.

htm

l *

on

ly o

pe

rate

s w

he

n s

ch

oo

l is

in s

ess

ion

e-t

ran

(C

ity

of

Elk

Gro

ve

Tran

sit

Cit

y o

f E

lk G

rove

, c

om

mu

ter

serv

ice

to

Sa

cra

me

nto

, e-v

an

par

atra

nsi

t se

rvic

e E

lk

Gro

ve a

nd

re

gio

nal

ly f

or

a h

igh

er

fare

Loc

al, c

om

mu

ter,

D

ial-

a-R

ide

/P

arat

ran

sit

rac

ks o

n a

ll fi

xed

ro

ute

an

d c

om

mu

te b

use

seT

RA

N 9

16.6

83

.872

6

eVA

N 9

16.6

83

.872

6e

-tra

n:

ww

w.e

-tra

n.o

rg

e-v

an:

htt

p:/

/ww

w.e

-tra

n.o

rg/p

arat

ran

sit.

asp

tran

sit

Op

erat

ors

co

mm

un

itie

s se

rved

sum

mar

y o

f se

rvic

es P

rovi

ded

Bik

e a

cces

sib

le/

cap

acit

yc

ust

om

er

serv

ice

tele

ph

on

e n

um

ber

ur

la

dd

itio

nal

info

rmat

ion

Fols

om

Sta

ge

Lin

es

Cit

y o

f Fo

lso

m lo

cal

, Dia

l-a-

Rid

e 2

pe

r ve

hic

le

916

.35

5.8

39

5w

ww

.fo

lso

m.c

a.u

s/d

ep

ts/p

ub

lic_

wo

rks/

tran

sit_

div

isio

n.a

sp

Par

atra

nsi

t, In

c.

Urb

an S

acra

me

nto

C

ou

nty

, in

clu

din

g t

he

C

itie

s o

f Sa

cra

me

nto

, C

itru

s H

eig

hts

, Elk

G

rove

, & R

anc

ho

C

ord

ova

Eld

erl

y an

d

co

mp

lem

en

tary

p

arat

ran

sit;

n

eig

hb

orh

oo

d

shu

ttle

s

no

Q

ual

ifie

d:

9

16.4

29

.274

4;

No

n-q

ual

ifie

d:

916

.55

7.4

68

5 o

r T

DD

9

16.5

57.

46

86

ww

w.p

arat

ran

sit.

org

Sac

ram

en

to R

eg

ion

al

Tran

sit

Urb

an S

acra

me

nto

C

ou

nty

, in

clu

din

g t

he

C

itie

s o

f Sa

cra

me

nto

, C

itru

s H

eig

hts

, Elk

G

rove

& R

anc

ho

C

ord

ova

loc

al, c

om

mu

ter,

sh

utt

les,

lig

ht

rail

ye

s/2

pe

r b

us

or

4 p

er

ligh

t ra

il c

ar

916

.32

1.B

USS

(2

877

) w

ww

.sac

rt.c

om

For

Bic

ycle

Lo

cke

r in

form

atio

n c

all (

916

) 5

56

-03

54

Sou

th C

ou

nty

Tra

nsi

t Li

nk

Sou

the

rn S

acra

me

nto

C

ou

nty

, in

clu

din

g lo

cal

se

rvic

es

in G

alt

and

Is

leto

n a

nd

co

nn

ec

tin

g

serv

ice

s to

Elk

Gro

ve,

Lod

i, an

d M

idto

wn

&

Do

wn

tow

n S

acra

me

nto

loc

al &

Dia

l-a-

Rid

e, c

om

mu

ter

ye

s/2

pe

r ve

hic

le

(so

me

allo

w f

or

3)

20

9.7

45.

30

52

or

80

0.3

38

.86

76w

ww

.sc

tlin

k.c

om

Co

mm

ute

r h

as w

i-fi

Su

tter

an

d y

ub

a c

ou

nti

es

Yub

a/Su

tte

r Tr

ansi

t A

uth

ori

tyC

itie

s o

f Li

ve O

ak,

Mar

ysvi

lle, W

he

atla

nd

&

Yu

ba

Cit

y, L

ind

a,

co

mm

ute

r se

rvic

e t

o

Do

wn

tow

n S

acra

me

nto

. U

nin

co

rpo

rate

d

co

mm

un

itie

s o

f B

row

nsv

ille

, Do

bb

ins

and

Oliv

eh

urs

t

loc

al, c

om

mu

ter,

D

ial-

a-R

ide

ye

s/3

pe

r ve

hic

le o

n

loc

al a

nd

co

mm

ute

r 5

30

.74

2.2

877

ww

w.y

ub

asu

tte

rtra

nsi

t.c

om

/ho

me

.htm

yo

lo c

ou

nty

Dav

is C

om

mu

nit

y Tr

ansi

tC

ity

of

Dav

is D

ial-

a-R

ide

n

o

53

0.7

57.

44

08

ww

w.c

ity.

dav

is.c

a.u

s/p

cs/

tran

sit/

Un

itra

ns

Cit

y o

f D

avis

, Un

ive

rsit

y o

f C

alif

orn

ia a

t D

avis

loc

al

no

5

30

.75

2.B

USS

(2

877

)w

ww

.un

itra

ns.

co

m

Yolo

Co

un

ty

Tran

spo

rtat

ion

Dis

tric

tW

oo

dla

nd

, Dav

is, W

est

Sa

cra

me

nto

, Win

ters

&

th

e C

apay

Val

ley

co

mm

un

itie

s

loc

al, c

om

mu

ter,

D

ial-

a-R

ide

ye

s/2

pe

r ve

hic

le

53

0.6

66

.28

77w

ww

.yo

lob

us.

co

mA

lso

pro

vid

es

Sac

ram

en

to In

tern

atio

nal

A

irp

ort

Se

rvic

e t

o:

Dav

is, W

oo

dla

nd

an

d

Do

wn

tow

n S

acra

me

nto

oth

er j

uri

sdic

tio

ns

Am

ado

r Tr

ansi

tC

om

mu

ter

serv

ice

fro

m

Am

ado

r C

ou

nty

to

th

e

Do

wn

tow

n S

acra

me

nto

an

d im

me

dia

te a

rea,

al

so fi

xed

ro

ute

an

d

DA

R s

erv

ice

w/i

n

Am

ado

r C

ou

nty

loc

al, c

om

mu

ter,

D

ial-

a-R

ide

ye

s/2

pe

r ve

hic

le

20

9.2

67.

93

95

ww

w.a

mad

ort

ran

sit.

co

m

tran

sit

Op

erat

ors

co

mm

un

itie

s se

rved

sum

mar

y o

f se

rvic

es P

rovi

ded

Bik

e a

cces

sib

le/

cap

acit

yc

ust

om

er

serv

ice

tele

ph

on

e n

um

ber

ur

la

dd

itio

nal

info

rmat

ion

Fair

fie

ld S

uis

un

Tra

nsi

tC

om

mu

ter

serv

ice

b

etw

ee

n d

ow

nto

wn

Sa

cra

me

nto

an

d

BA

RT

via

Dav

is, D

ixo

n,

Vac

avill

e a

nd

Fai

rfie

ld,

and

co

nn

ec

ts w

ith

Sa

cra

me

nto

RT,

Yo

lob

us,

Val

lejo

an

d

Vac

avill

e C

ity

Co

ach

. A

lso

pro

vid

es

loc

al a

nd

in

terc

ity

fixe

d r

ou

te, a

nd

A

DA

par

atra

nsi

t w

ith

in

Sola

no

Co

un

ty.

loc

al &

c

om

mu

ter,

AD

A/

Dia

l-a-

Rid

e

co

mm

ute

r ro

ute

s o

nly

/2 p

er

veh

icle

70

7.4

22

.BU

SS (

28

77)

htt

p:/

/ww

w.f

astt

ran

sit.

org

/

San

Jo

aqu

in R

eg

ion

al

Tran

sit

Fixe

d r

ou

te a

nd

DA

R

serv

ice

th

rou

gh

ou

t Sa

n J

oaq

uin

Co

un

ty,

as w

ell

as in

terr

eg

ion

al

co

mm

ute

r se

rvic

es

to t

he

Bay

Are

a an

d

Sac

ram

en

to a

reas

loc

al, c

om

mu

ter,

D

ial-

a-R

ide

ye

s/2

pe

r ve

hic

le

20

9.9

43

.111

1w

ww

.sj-

smar

t.c

om

TAP

S (U

CD

Me

d C

en

ter

Shu

ttle

)U

CD

Me

d C

en

ter

Shu

ttle

Sh

utt

le b

etw

ee

n

UC

D a

nd

UC

D

Me

d C

en

ter

Sac

ram

en

to

rac

ks o

n la

rge

bu

ses

on

ly /

2 p

er

veh

icle

5

30

.75

2.T

AP

S o

r 9

16.7

34

.86

30

htt

p:/

/ww

w.u

cd

mc

.uc

dav

is.e

du

/par

kin

g/

tran

spo

rtat

ion

/cam

pu

s_ti

me

tab

le.h

tml

Amtrak

Caltrans provides operating funds for the three Amtrak in-state routes: The Capitol Corridor (Auburn to San Jose); the San Joaquin (Bay Area/ Sacramento to Bakersfield); and the Pacific Surfliner (San Luis Obispo to San Diego). The Capitol Corridor provides daily rail service between Auburn, Sacramento, Oakland/San Francisco and San Jose. The Sacramento to Oakland segment has 16 weekday round trips and 11 weekend/holiday round trips. One daily round-trip train serves Au-burn, plus there are bus connections at other times of the day. Seven round trips continue to south San Jose. The Capitol Corridor carried over 1.7 million passengers in federal fiscal year 2011 and is expected to top 2 million annual passengers by the close of federal fiscal year 2012. It is the Amtrak route with the best on-time performance (94 percent) in the nation. The San Joaquin Route provides intercity rail service between the Bay Area and Sacramento and Bakersfield, with bus connections to Los Angeles, Redding, Yosemite National Park and Las Vegas, Nevada. See http://www.amtrak.com for specific route in-formation and available connections.


Sacramento Region

74

AASHTo

American Association of State Highway and

Transportation Officials and including their

publications

Access Management

The principles, laws and techniques used to

control access to a highway.

Actuation

The output from any type of detector to the

controller unit.

ADA

The Americans with Disabilities Act: civil

rights legislation passed in 1990, effective

July 1992.

ADT

Average Daily Traffic. The measurement of

the average number of vehicles passing a

certain point each day on a highway, road

or street

All-Terrain Bike (ATB) Trail

An unpaved trail winding through areas

of natural beauty with only a minimum of

grading required. Some brush removal may

be advisable to offer an unobstructed path.

This type of trail should have some short,

steep grades to challenge the rider; how-

ever, level, wide trails would appeal to the

majority of riders. The most satisfactory ATB

trail is not shared with other users.

Amplifier Detector

A device that is capable of intensifying the

electrical energy produced by a sensor. A

loop detector unit is commonly called an

EAPPENDix

gLoSSARy of TERMS

Bicycle Parking cage

A steel or wood frame open structure with

sides and top of chain link fence or expand-

ed sheet steel to permit continual security

inspection. The interior of the parking cage

can accommodate Class II or Class III park-

ing racks. A bicyclist must obtain a key to the

entrance door.

Bicycle Shower/Locker facility

A shower/locker facility of sufficient size to

accommodate both male and female em-

ployees who commute to work by bicycle.

Bicyclist/cyclist

Any bicycle operator

Bike Boulevard

An on-road bicycle facility where car traffic

is limited and bicycle traffic is facilitated.

Bike Lane

A portion of a roadway, which has been

designated by striping and pavement mark-

ings for the preferential or exclusive use of

bicyclists

Bike Path

A bicycle facility characterized by a separate

right-of-way.

Bikeway

A bikeway is created when a road has the

appropriate design treatment for bicyclists,

based on motor vehicle traffic volumes and

speeds: shared roadway, shoulder bikeway,

bike lane or bicycle boulevard. Another type

of facility is separated from the roadway:

multi-use path.

amplifier even though its electronic function

is actually different.

Area Detection

The continuous detection of vehicles over

a length of roadway wherein the call is in-

tended to be held as long as there is a ve-

hicle in the detection area.

Arterial (Street)

A street designated to carry traffic, mostly

uninterrupted, through an urban area, or

to different neighborhoods within an urban

area.

Bicycle

A vehicle having two tandem wheels, a min-

imum of 14” (35 cm) in diameter, propelled

solely by human power through a belt,

chain, gears, or pedals, upon which any per-

son or persons may ride. A three-wheeled

adult tricycle is considered a bicycle.

Bicycle facility

Any facility provided for the benefit of bi-

cycle travel, including bikeways and parking

facilities as well as all other roadways not

specifically designated for bicycle use

Bicycle-friendly

Used to describe man-made environments

designed to accommodate bicycles and fa-

cilitate their use.

Bicycle institute of America (BiA)

An international, nonprofit organization

promoting bicycle sales and use through

increased media coverage.


class i Bicycle Parking facility

An enclosed box with a locking door, typi-

cally called a bicycle locker, where a single

bicyclist has access to the bicycle storage

compartment.

class ii Bicycle Parking facility

A stationary bicycle rack designed to secure

the frame and both wheels of the bicycle,

where the bicyclist supplies only a padlock.

class iii Bicycle Parking facility

A stationary bicycle rack, typically a cement

slab or vertical metal bar, where the bicyclist

supplies a padlock and chain or cable to se-

cure the bicycle to the stationary object.

clearance, Lateral

The width required for safe passage as mea-

sured in a horizontal plane.

clearance, vertical

The height required for safe passage as

measured in a vertical plane

cog

Council of Governments

collector (Street)

A street designated to carry traffic between

local streets and arterials, or from local

street to local street

complete Streets

Streets that adequately provide for all road-

way users, including bicyclists, pedestrians,

transit riders, and motorists, to the extent

appropriate to the function and context of

the street.

cross Section or Typical cross Section or

Typical

Diagrammatic Presentation of a highway

profile at right angles to the centerline at a

given location

call

A registration of a demand for right-of-way

by traffic at a controller unit. The call comes

to the controller from a detector unit that is

outputting an actuation.

caltrans

California Department of Transportation

cBD

Central Business District. A traditional

downtown area usually characterized by

established businesses fronting the street,

sidewalks, slow traffic speeds, on-street

parking and a compact grid street system.

circulation Path

An exterior or interior way of passage from

one place to another for pedestrians, in-

cluding but not limited to walks, hallways,

courtyards, stairways, and stair landings.

class i (Multi-use Path)

A facility completely separated from traffic

designated for the use of pedestrians, bi-

cycles, or other non-motorized transporta-

tion. The facility is separated from any street

or highway by a physical space, berm, fence,

car parking or other barrier.

class ii (Bike Lane)

A portion of a roadway or shoulder which

is separated from traffic lanes by the use of

a solid white stripe on the pavement and

has been designated for preferential use by

bicyclists.. It is commonly demarcated with

signs, striped lane markings, painted pave-

ment, and pavement legends.

class iii (Bike Route)

Any on street right-of-way recommended

for bicycle travel that provides for shared

use with motor vehicles or pedestrian traf-

fic, often where vehicle traffic and speed is

limited and bicycle traffic facilitated. These

routes can be demarcated by “Sharrows” or

other identifying signs and markings.

crosswalk

Portion of a roadway designated for pedes-

trian crossing, marked or unmarked. Un-

marked crosswalks are the natural extension

of the shoulder, curb line or sidewalk.

curb Ramp

A sloping pedestrian way, intended for

pedestrian traffic, which provides access

between a walk or sidewalk to a surface lo-

cated above or below an adjacent curb face.

cycle

A complete sequence of signal indications

for all approaches for which there is a de-

mand or call by traffic.

Detector System

The complete sensing and indicating group

consisting of the detector unit, transmission

lines and sensor.

DLcD

Department of Land Conservation and De-

velopment.

frontage Road

A road designate and designed to serve local

traffic parallel adjacent to a highway or arte-

rial street.

Extension Time

Extra time resulting from detector ac-

tuations to allow safe passage of vehicles

through an intersection.

goal

An end toward which effort is directed; it is

general and timeless.

grade

A measure of the steepness of a roadway,

bikeway or walkway, expressed in a ratio of

vertical rise per horizontal distance, usually

in percent; e.g. a 5% grade equals 5 m of rise

over a 100 m horizontal distance.


Sacramento Region

76

grade Separation

The vertical separation of conflicting travel-

ways through use of a structure so that traf-

fic crosses without interference.

guide Signs

A green standard bike route sign (G-93) is

the basic device to advise the motorist to

expect bicycles along a particular route. The

G-93 bike route sign be placed at all route

turns and after leaving main intersections.

Highway

A general term denoting a public way for

purposes of travel, including the entire area

within the right-of-way.

Hiking, jogging Trail

A facility with the same geometrical con-

figuration as a Class I Bikeway; however, it

may be surfaced with a non-hardening fin-

ish such as disintegrated granite or it may be

un-surfaced. A surfaced hiking and jogging

trail may be shared with bicycles. The facil-

ity is separated from motorized vehicles and

cross-flow of traffic is minimized.

inductance

That property of an electric circuit or of two

(2) neighboring circuits whereby an electro-

motive force is generated in one circuit by

a change of current in itself or in the other;

the ratio of the electromotive force to the

rate of change of the circuit.

in-street Bike Parking

The conversion of a parking space adjacent

to a roadway into bicycle parking. This can

be an appropriate measure to accommo-

date higher bicycle parking demand and/

or to prioritize the use of existing sidewalk

space for pedestrian movement.

jaywalking

Crossing a street illegally; includes walking

against a traffic control device, or stepping

out in front of a moving vehicle so as to

present an immediate danger, whether in a

crosswalk or not, or crossing at an intersec-

tion outside of a crosswalk

LcDc

Land Conservation and Development Com-

mission

League of American Bicyclists

Founded in 1880, a national organization

of bicyclists and bicycle clubs. It promotes

cyclists’ rights, sponsors rallies, and provides

members with touring information.

Legend

Words, phrases or numbers appearing on all

or part of a traffic control device; also the

symbols that appear on maps.

Local Street

A street designated to provide access to and

from residences or businesses.

Longitudinal Striping

A 6-inch wide solid white line used to sepa-

rate a bike lane from a motor vehicle lane.

A 4-inch wide solid white line used where

there is sufficient width to allow parking ad-

jacent to a bike lane.

Loop Detector

A detector that senses a change in induc-

tance of its inductive loop sensor caused by

the passage of presence of a vehicle near

the sensor.

Marked crossing

A crosswalk or other identified path intend-

ed for pedestrian use in crossing a vehicular

way.

MuTcD

The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control

Devices approved by the Federal Highway

Administration as a national standard for

placement and selection of all traffic control

devices on or adjacent to all highways open

to public travel.

Magnetic Detector

A detector that senses changes in the earth’s

magnetic field caused by the movement of a

vehicle near its sensor unit.

Magnetometer

A detector that measures the difference

in the level of the earth’s magnetic forces

caused by the passage or presence of a ve-

hicle near its sensor.

May

A PERMISSIVE condition. No requirement for

application is intended. If a particular device

is used under a “may” condition, however,

its design shall follow the prescribed format.

Motor vehicle

A vehicle that is self-propelled or designed

for self-propulsion.

MPo

Metropolitan Planning Organization: An

agency that combines the governing bod-

ies of neighboring cities where combined

population exceeds 50,000.

Multi-use Trail System

A path physically separated from motor

vehicle traffic by an open space or barrier

and either within a highway right-of-way

or within an independent right-of-way, of

sufficient width to accommodate touring/

commuter bicycling, horseback riding, hik-

ing, jogging, and all-terrain bikes with ap-

propriate trail surfacing may be classified as

a multi-use trail system.

Needs and issues

A statement that describes activities that

should be improved or continued in order

to achieve desirable levels of service. Issues

are unresolved concerns that must be cor-

rected to provide adequate service. Needs

and issues are achieved or resolved by im-

plementing specific policies and actions or

programs.

objective

A result to be achieved by a stated point in

time. It is capable of being quantified and

realistically attained considering probable

funding and political constraints. Objec-

tives are successive levels of achievement


in movement toward a goal, and should be

tied to a time-specific period for implemen-

tation programs.

off-Street

Includes all property outside the dedicated

road right-of-way including both public and

private ownership.

on-Street

All street or road right-of-way including

curb, gutters, and sidewalk, also, in some

cases may include a setback behind the

back of sidewalk.

open Space

Any public or private undeveloped or pre-

dominately undeveloped land in Sacramen-

to County which has value now or in the

future for parks and recreation purposes,

for conservation of land and other natural

resources or for historic or scenic purposes.

Pavement Markings

Painted or applied lines or legends placed

on a roadway surface for regulating, guiding

or warning traffic. A standard pavement leg-

end is the words “Bike Lane” supplemented

by an arrow showing the direction of travel.

The arrow is used in combination with the

words at each location where a legend is

painted.

Pedestrian

A person on foot, in a wheelchair or walking

a bicycle.

Pedestrian Detector

A detector, usually a push button that is re-

sponsive to operation by or the presence of

a pedestrian.

Pedestrian facility

A facility provided for the benefit of pedes-

trian travel, including walkways, crosswalks,

grade separations, signs, signals, illumina-

tion and benches.

Pedestrian Phase

A traffic phase allocated to pedestrian traffic

either concurrently with a vehicle phase or

exclusive of other phases.

Phase

A part of the cycle allocated to any traffic

movements receiving the right-of-way.

Phase Sequence

A predetermined order in which the phases

of a cycle occur.

Point Detection

The detection of vehicles as they pass a spe-

cific point on the roadway, also referred to

as small area detection.

Policy

A direction statement that guides actions for

use in determining present and future deci-

sions.

Presence Loop Detector

An induction loop detector that is capable of

detecting the presence of standing or mov-

ing vehicles within the effective area.

Probe

The sensor form that is commonly used

with a magnetometer type detector unit.

Program

A specific action, procedure, or technique

that carries out plan policy. An implementa-

tion measure, standing alone, which dictates

that an action will occur; the action may be

measurable and time-specific.

Quadrupole

A loop configuration that is essentially two

(2) loops with a common side. The wires

are wound continuously in a figure eight (8)

pattern so that current flow in the common

side is in the same direction. The design

improves sensitivity to small vehicles and

reduces adjacent lane detection.

Recreation cyclist

An individual(s) who uses a bicycle for the

trip enjoyment itself. Ultimate destination is

of secondary importance.

Regulatory Signs

A black and white regulatory “Bike Lane” sign

(R8l) is used when positive control signing is

needed in addition to the G-93 “Bike Route”

sign to deter vehicle or other encroach-

ments on bike lanes.

Other regulatory signs may be needed rela-

tive to the interaction between motor ve-

hicles and bicycles on roadways with bike

lanes, particularly in the vicinity of intersec-

tions.

Right-of-way

A general term denoting publicly owned

land, property, or interest therein, usually in

a strip, acquired for or devoted to transpor-

tation purposes.

Right of way

The right of one vehicle or pedestrian to

proceed in a lawful manner in preference to

another vehicle or pedestrian.

Roadway

The paved portion of the highway

Roundabout

A type of circular junction in which road

traffic must travel in one direction around a

central island. Signs usually direct traffic en-

tering the circle to slow down and give the

right of way to drivers already in the circle.

Rules of The Road

The portion of a motor vehicle law that con-

tains regulations governing the operation of

vehicular and pedestrian traffic


Sacramento Region

78

SAfETEA-Lu

Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Trans-

portation Equity Act

A Legacy for Users. SAFETEA-LU authorizes

the Federal surface transportation programs

for highways, highway safety, and transit for

the 5-year period 2005–2009.

Sensitivity

The setting on the detector unit that de-

termines the amount of inductance shift

required to actuate the detector. High sen-

sitivities require low inductance shifts.

Sensor unit

An electrical conductor (“loop”) in the road-

way designed such that the presence or

passage of a vehicle causes a decrease in

the inductance of the loop.

Separation

An intervening space or a physical barrier

between the bike path and the roadway so

that the bike path is not contiguous to the

outer edge of the paved highway shoulder.

Shall

A MANDATORY condition. Where certain

requirements in the design or application

of the device are described with the “shall”

stipulation, it is mandatory that these re-

quirements be met.

Should

An ADVISORY condition. Where the word

“should” is used, it is considered to be advis-

able usage, recommended, but not manda-

tory.

Shoulder

The portion of a highway that is contiguous

to the travel lanes provided for pedestrians,

bicyclists, and emergency use by vehicles,

and for lateral support of base and surface

courses. This is often used in place of a side-

walk or bike lane in rural areas.

Shy Distance

The distance between the edge of a travel-

way and a fixed object.

Sidewalk

A walkway separated from the roadway with

a curb, constructed of a durable, hard and

smooth surface, designed for preferential or

exclusive use by pedestrians.

Sight Distance

The distance a person can see along an un-

obstructed line of sight.

Skew Angle

The angle formed between a roadway, bike-

way or walkway and an intersecting road-

way, bikeway, walkway or railway measured

away from the perpendicular.

Sonic Detector

A vehicle detector that emits high frequency

sound energy and senses the reflection of

that energy from a vehicle in its field.

Structure

A bridge, retaining wall or tunnel.

Traffic calming

Measures intended to slow or reduce mo-

tor-vehicle traffic in order to improve safety

for pedestrians and bicyclists and improve

the environment for residents.

Traffic control Devices

Signs, signals or other fixtures, whether per-

manent or temporary, placed on or adjacent

to a travel-way by any authority of a public

body having jurisdiction to regulate, warn or

guide traffic.

Traffic volume

The given number of vehicles that pass

a given point for a given amount of time

(hour, day, year). See ADT.

Transit Mall

A street, or set of streets, in a city or town

along which automobile traffic is prohibited

or greatly restricted and only public transit

vehicles, bicycles and pedestrians are per-

mitted.

TSP

Transportation System Plan: The overall

plan for all transportation modes for a given

area (usually city, county or MPO).

ugB

Urban Growth Boundary: the area sur-

rounding an incorporated city in which the

city may legally expand its city limits.

ultrasonic Detector

A detector that senses the presence or pas-

sage of vehicles through its field of emitted

ultrasonic energy.

urban Area

The area immediately surrounding an in-

corporated city or rural community that is

urban in character, regardless of size.

utility cyclist

An individual(s) who uses a bicycle primarily

to reach a particular destination to purchase

or deliver goods and services. Messengers

are classified as utility cyclists.

vehicle

Any device in, upon or by which any per-

son or property is or may be transported or

drawn upon a highway, including vehicles

that are self-propelled or powered by any

means.

video Detection

The use of video sensors to monitor and

detect activity


walkway

A transportation facility built for use by pe-

destrians, including persons in wheelchairs.

Walkways include sidewalks, paths and

paved shoulders.

warning Signs

A yellow bicycle crossing sign (W11-1) as

established in the National Manual on Uni-

form Traffic Control Devices is the standard

sign for use in advance of a point where an

officially designated bike path or bike trail

crosses a roadway.

wayfinding Signage

A systematic way of providing consistent,

clear, and user-friendly information about

distances and routes to transit and key des-

tinations for bicyclists and pedestrians. Best

practices of design depend on the intended

audience, e.g. wayfinding for bicyclists is

oriented to a moving bicycle, whereas way-

finding for pedestrians considers that the

pedestrian can walk up to the sign and take

their time in processing the information.

wide outside Lane

A wider than normal curbside travel lane

that is provided for ease of bicycle opera-

tion where there is insufficient room for a

bike lane or shoulder bikeway.

1415 L Street, Suite 300

Sacramento, CA 95814

tel 916.321.9000

tdd 916.321.9550

www.sacog.org

Item #13-5-5 T r a ns p or ta t i on C om mi t te e Ac t i o n April 25, 2013 Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER) V Nomination Process Issue: Should the Transportation Committee recommend that the Board confirm staff recommendations for the TIGER V program? Recommendation: That the Transportation Committee (1) delegate to the Committee Chair and Vice-Chairs the selection of candidate projects to be endorsed by the Board, in recognition of the limited application timeframe, and (2) recommend that the Board endorse the selected list of projects at its May 16 meeting and authorize staff to provide support letters. Discussion: Staff is currently in the process of soliciting TIGER V project nominations from local agencies and transit districts in the four-county SACOG region comprised of Sacramento, Sutter, Yolo, and Yuba counties. The El Dorado County Transportation Commission and the Placer County Transportation Planning Agency have separate processes for their respective counties. On April 22, the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) released the notice of funding availability for the fifth round of the Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER V) program. The TIGER V program will award a total of $474 million to fund highway, bridge, transit, port and passenger and freight rail projects. Applications will be accepted between April 29 and June 3, 2013. This condensed application development and submittal window is necessitating SACOG staff to solicit candidate projects in tandem with the May SACOG Board and committee cycle. The TIGER program is highly competitive. The previous four rounds of the TIGER program provided $3.1 billion to 218 projects in all 50 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico. The SACOG region in the past has been successful in securing this highly sought after funding source. Most recently, in the TIGER IV process, the City of Sacramento was successful in securing $15 million for the Intermodal Transportation Facility. The TIGER program has two defined funding categories, “at-large” and “rural areas.” For the “at-large” category, applications must be between $10 and $200 million total and have a 20 percent non-federal match. For the “rural areas” category, applications must be between $1 and $10 million. DOT may increase the federal share above 80 percent only for projects located in “rural areas,” in which case DOT may fund up to 100 percent of the costs of a project. In the process to identify potential TIGER V project proposals, staff from federal agencies, Caltrans, and SACOG are emphasizing that this is a unique, limited funding opportunity from DOT. SACOG and member agencies are not guaranteed any funds through the process, and national competition is likely to be just as high as or higher than four prior TIGER rounds. The previous four rounds of the TIGER program provided $3.1 billion to 218 projects in all 50 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico.

The TIGER V program has many similarities to the previous TIGER IV program, but with a few notable differences. Applications must demonstrate that the project can meet all local, state, and federal requirements by June 30, 2014, to obligate funding in advance of September 30, 2014. Additionally, short-term economic impact, including employment, is now included in the primary criterion of economic competitiveness. Other performance outcomes remain the same and include safety, improving the condition of existing transportation facilities and systems, improving energy efficiency and reducing greenhouse gas emissions, improving the safety of U.S. transportation facilities, and improving the quality of living and working environments of communities through increased transportation choices and connections. Approved by: Mike McKeever Chief Executive Officer MM:RDO:gg Key Staff: Matt Carpenter, Director of Transportation Services, (916) 340-6276

Renée DeVere-Oki, Senior Planner, (916) 340-6219

Item #13-5-6 Transportat ion Committee Act ion April 26, 2013 Fiscal Year 2013-14 Provisional Budget for the Capitol Valley Regional Service Authority for Freeways and Expressways (CVRS) Issue: Should the Transportation Committee recommend that the Capitol Valley Regional Service Authority for Freeways and Expressways (CVRS) Board release the attached draft Fiscal Year (FY) 2013-14 provisional budget for public comment? Recommendation: That the Transportation Committee recommend that the CVRS Board release a draft FY 2013-14 provisional budget for public review and comment and direct staff to continue strategic planning efforts previously requested by the Board. A final provisional budget is anticipated for action in June with the likelihood of a budget amendment in the fall to reflect priorities from the CVRS strategic planning process. Discussion: CVRS is comprised of Glenn, Sutter, Yuba, Yolo, Sacramento, El Dorado, and San Joaquin counties. The revenues for the CVRS are collected as a $1 fee assessed at the time of vehicle registration in the participating counties. These revenues are mandated to be used to provide call box services, provide motorist aid services such as Freeway Service Patrol, and 511 traveler information services. CVRS bylaws require that a work program and budget be approved before July 1 of each fiscal year. The proposed draft CVRS budget submitted for review is balanced for normal expenditures. Revenues for the overall CVRS-SAFE draft budget are estimated at $2.22 million, while expenditures are budgeted at $2.02 million. The $200,000 in surplus revenues would add to the program’s cash position. The cash position is projected to grow to $5.19 million by the end of FY 2013-14. Prior to the adoption of the current year (FY 2012-13) CVRS-SAFE budget, there were concerns regarding the potential for substantial increase in the future costs for the call box maintenance component of the CVRS program. Given that the call box maintenance program consumes more than 20 percent of the total CVRS budget, staff monitored the situation and actions of the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) on this matter. In the spring of 2012, the DIR issued a statewide ruling that certain services provided as part of call box maintenance contracts must be compensated at a prevailing wage; however, the labor classifications impacted by the ruling were not clear. Clarity on the ruling was provided in early 2013 and at that time it was clear that the prevailing wage issue would not negatively impact the current CVRS contractor, Siemens ITS (formerly Republic ITS). With the resolution of the call box maintenance “prevailing wage issue”, staff is proposing to release an RFP for call box maintenance services as part of Agenda Item #7. The contract with the existing CVRS call box maintenance contractor, Siemens ITS, has been extended through December 2013 and should allow for any change-over tasks to be completed, should a new call box maintenance contractor be chosen during the contractor selection process. In order to ensure the contract deadline at the end of the year, the CVRS Call Box Maintenance RFP is being released in advance of the completion of a draft strategic plan for the CVRS. The strategic plan under development includes an analysis of county budget balances, review of the core existing services provided by the CVRS, and research on cost-effective new services that could be provided that can meet the required nexus to “motorist aid,” as required by the SAFE authorizing legislation. Upon completion of the strategic planning work and the selection of a call box maintenance contractor, staff will likely return to the Transportation Committee with proposed revisions to the FY 2013-14 budget for the CVRS program. Approved by: Mike McKeever Chief Executive Officer MM:MH:gg Attachments Key Staff: Matt Carpenter, Director of Transportation Services, (916) 340-6276 Mark Heiman, ITS/511/SAFE Program Manager, (916) 340-6232 Barbara VaughanBechtold, Associate Planner, (916) 340-6226

Attachment A

FY 2011-12 FY 2012-13 FY 2012-13 FY 2013-14Actual Adopted Budget Estimated Actual Proposed

REVENUE

Interest 13,469$ 9,000$ 9,000$ 10,000$ Registration Fees 2,261,155 2,095,158 2,095,158 2,178,964Reimbursements from Glenn County 15,610 13,000 13,000 13,000Reimbursements from Placer County 2,892 2,500 2,500 2,500Knockdown Recovery 23,173 16,000 20,000 16,000TOTAL REVENUE 2,316,299$ 2,135,658$ 2,139,658$ 2,220,464$

EXPENDITURES Call Box Maintenance (including Placer/Glenn County) 459,684$ 469,373$ 430,000$ 469,373$ Freeway Service Patrol - Sacramento County 706,000 720,200 720,200 720,200Freeway Service Patrol - San Joaquin County on I-205 66,801 113,000 60,000 113,000Freeway Service Patrol - Yolo County 26,250 26,800 26,800 26,800Freeway Service Patrol - El Dorado County 52,159 22,354 31,116 31,116SAFE portion of Statewide CHP Coordinator 3,960 4,200 4,200 5,500Private Call Answering Contract - Fixed call boxes (voice & TTY) 15,358 36,000 17,000 36,000Private Call Answering Contract - Bike Trail Boxes - TTY only 7,500 9,000 9,000 9,000SACOG Services (staff time and indirect costs) 84,765 72,145 51,000 201,871Cellular Phone Service (including Placer/Glenn County) 111,508 125,000 107,000 125,000Consultant 50,870 91,328 60,000 98,861Insurance 8,524 9,000 9,000 9,000Public Information 0 5,000 0 2,000Legal Services 6,149 4,000 4,000 6,000DMV Fees 11,107 12,000 12,000 12,000Meetings/Printing 628 4,000 500 4,000511/STARNET - Capital Improvements Project 60,965 69,353 60,000 60,000511/STARNET - Maintenance & Operations 75,094 97,521 75,000 75,000511 Program Management - San Joaquin County 12,800 15,000 15,000 15,000

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,760,122$ 1,905,274$ 1,691,816$ 2,019,721$

REVENUE LESS EXPENDITURES 556,177 230,384 447,842$ 200,743

PROJECTED ENDING CASH BALANCE 4,307,110 4,537,494 4,985,336 5,186,079

CAPITOL VALLEY REGIONAL SAFE PROPOSED FY 2013-14 PROVISIONAL BUDGET (DRAFT)

Item #13-5-7 Transportat ion Committee Act ion April 25, 2013 Capitol Valley Regional Service Authority for Freeways and Expressways Call Box Maintenance Request for Proposals Release Issue: Should the Transportation Committee recommend the release of a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the Call Box Maintenance program? Recommendation: That the Transportation Committee recommend that the Capitol Valley Regional Service Authority for Freeways and Expressways (CVRS) Board release an RFP for Call Box Maintenance program. Discussion: CVRS is tasked with the core function of operating and maintaining a motorist aid system of call boxes on freeways and state highways in: El Dorado, Sacramento, San Joaquin, Sutter, Yolo, and Yuba counties. Under contract, CVRS also manages and operates the call box system in Glenn County and the suicide prevention call boxes on the Foresthill Bridge in Placer County. The system’s digital cellular phones are equipped with text telephone (TTY) capabilities that allow user to communicate using a keyboard and display in addition to voice. Siemens ITS maintains all the call boxes in the CVRS call box program, as well as those call boxes operated in Glenn and Placer counties under contract. The current CVRS Call Box Maintenance services contract will expire at the end of this calendar year. Upon approval by the CVRS Board, an RFP (Attachment A) for Call Box Maintenance services not to exceed $470,000 per year will be released on May 17, 2013. The RFP will be for a three-year period with the potential of two one-year extensions. The RFP requests contractors submitting proposals to both provide estimates on the cost of general maintenance services related to the maintenance of all call boxes in the CVRS call box system, as well as reductions in maintenance fees associated with permanent call box site removals over the contract time period. Qualified proposals will be evaluated by a Proposal Evaluation Committee made up of CVRS staff and a recommendation prepared for consideration by the Transportation Committee at its August meeting. Approved by: Mike McKeever Chief Executive Officer MM:BVB:gg Key Staff: Kirk Trost, Chief Operating Officer & General Counsel, (916) 340-6210 Matt Carpenter, Director of Transportation Services, (916) 340-6276 Mark Heiman, ITS/511 Manager, (916) 340-6232 Barbara VaughanBechtold, Associate Planner, (916) 340-6226

1301501

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

CALL BOX MAINTENANCE AND SELECTED SITE REMOVALS

NOT TO EXCEED $2,350,000 ($470,000/year maximum)

Released: May 17, 2013

Proposals Due: June 7, 2013

CAPITOL VALLEY REGIONAL SERVICE AUTHORITY FOR FREEWAYS AND EXPRESSWAYS

1415 L STREET, SUITE 300 SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95814

(916) 321-9000

2

SACRAMENTO AREA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

CALL BOX MAINTENANCE AND SELECTED SITE REMOVALS

I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... II. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................. III. PROJECT SUMMARY AND DESCRIPTION .............................................................. IV. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS IV. SCOPE OF WORK/SERVICES ...................................................................................... V. CONTRACT DELIVERABLES ..................................................................................... VI. CONTACT PERSONS .................................................................................................... VII. PROJECT TIMETABLE ................................................................................................. VIII. GENERAL CONDITIONS ............................................................................................. IX. PROPOSAL CONTENT AND ORGANIZATION ........................................................ X. PROPOSAL EVALUATION AND SELECTION .......................................................... XI. PAYMENT SCHEDULE ................................................................................................ EXHIBIT A: STANDARD AGREEMENT BETWEEN CVRS AND CONSULTANT

EXHIBIT B: LEVINE ACT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

EXHIBIT C: PRICE PROPOSAL FOR CVRS CALL BOX MAINTENANCE AND SITE

REMOVAL

EXHIBIT D: CURRENT CONTRACT WITH REPUBLIC ITS

EXHIBIT E: UNIVERSAL PRICE LIST EXHIBIT F: SYSTEM INSTALLATION/PERMANENT REMOVAL REPORT SPECIFICATIONS

3

EXHIBIT G: SYSTEM DATABASE SPECIFICATIONS

EXHIBIT H: SYSTEM OPERATION AND SITE CONDITION FORM

4

I. INTRODUCTION The Capitol Valley Regional Service Authority for Freeways and Expressways (CVRS) was formed pursuant to Section 2550 et seq. of the California Streets and Highway Code for the purpose of implementation, maintaining and operating a motorist aid system of call boxes on freeways and state highways in the following counties: the County of Sacramento; the County of Yolo; the County of Sutter; the County of Yuba; the County of El Dorado; and the County of San Joaquin. By contract, CVRS also manages and operates the call box system in Glenn County. II. BACKGROUND The Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) manages the Sacramento region's highway call box program and provides staffing and management for CVRS. The greater Sacramento region's highway call box program is a cooperative effort that has put more than 1,170 call boxes on about 750 miles of highway in a seven-county area, including 41 call boxes along the American River Parkway (ARP) Bike Trail that runs along the American River from I-5 to Folsom Lake. The boxes provide motorists, as well as bicyclists using the ARP Bike Trail, in need with a direct link to the California Highway Patrol, via a private call answering service. The program is a joint venture of Sacramento, San Joaquin, Sutter, Yolo, Yuba, and El Dorado counties, which together operate CVRS. CVRS also manages the call boxes located in Glenn County and those on the Foresthill Bridge in Placer County. The Call Boxes are financed by an annual $1 charge on all registered vehicles in the participating counties, or by other funding sources. The purpose of this RFP is to obtain services related to the maintenance of all call boxes in the CVRS call box system, which would include the temporary site removals and reinstallation, as well as permanent site removal of an as yet unknown number/percentage of existing call box sites with a commensurate estimate of reduction in maintenance fees by number and percentage (or fraction thereof) of call box sites permanently removed. The proposed contract term is three years, with the option for two one-year extensions by CVRS. While CVRS has approximately 1170 call box sites, the actual number of boxes in place at any one time varies due to freeway construction projects and call box maintenance activities. Some consideration is being given to further reducing the number of permanent call boxes. III. PROJECT SUMMARY AND DESCRIPTION The contract for the Maintenance of the Capitol Valley Regional SAFE Call Boxes will be an agreement between CVRS and the contractor. CVRS will provide contract administration services. The contractor will invoice CVRS for services rendered and CVRS will compensate the contractor for these services as set forth in the agreement. Funding for the Maintenance services will be provided by CVRS. The CVRS Board of Directors will award the contract and project deliverables will be reviewed by the CVRS/SAFE Project Manager. IV. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS

5

Eligible Proposers must:

• Have the administrative, technical and financial capability to provide all maintenance to call boxes in the CVRS system, including maintaining all digital cellular technology and all TTY functions, as well as site removal and repair services.

• Currently own and operate a business that designs, builds, installs and maintains digital cellular call boxes with TTY. If the Proposer is a partnership or joint venture, this requirement will be applicable to the managing partner or joint venture member.

• Possess all necessary licenses and permits required by the laws of the United States, the State of California, the Counties involved in the CVRS call box system, and all other appropriate governmental agencies, for providing the required equipment and services, and agree to maintain these licenses and permits in effect for the duration of the contract.

• Be ready, willing and able to execute and fulfill the Contract attached as Exhibit “A” and incorporated by reference herein.

V. SCOPE OF WORK/SERVICES The scope of work for the Project is described below. The selected contractor will be expected to perform all technical and other analyses necessary to complete the scope of work. The contractor will receive general direction from the CVRS/SAFE Project Manager. Task 1: Call Box Maintenance The selected vendor will provide ongoing preventative and corrective maintenance to all CVRS call boxes, as well as knockdown replacement and graffiti removal. The maintenance provided for a potential period of five (5) years (initial 3 year contract term with the option of two (2) one year extensions), must meet or exceed the requirements in the current maintenance agreement CVRS has with Republic Intelligent Transportation Systems, Inc. (dba Republic Electric, Republic ITS, Siemens ITS), a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “D”. The annual flat fee pricing submitted on the Price Proposal on Exhibit “C” must include all maintenance costs as described in Sections 2.0 (“SYSTEM MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES”) and 6.0 (“TIME AND MATERIALS”) below. Section 1.0 - GENERAL 1.1 Establish a Local Maintenance Field Office: Prior to beginning work on the contracted

CVRS call box maintenance services the contractor shall establish a local maintenance field office located within the six county region including El Dorado, Sacramento, San Joaquin, Sutter, Yolo and Yuba counties.

1.2 Plans and Specifications: Contractor shall keep at the local maintenance field office a copy

of all plans and specifications referred to herein, to which CVRS shall have access at all times. For the completion of tasks outlined in Section 2.0, System Maintenance Activities, the plans and specifications include the original RFP, with all Appendices and Addenda, and the system plans and standard drawings. Any additional documentation or specifications for

6

new equipment or processes (e.g., transceiver, TTY, ATM, sonalert or smart card electronic devices, as well as painting processes) shall also be kept by Contractor in the local maintenance field office and be available for review by the CVRS Project Manager or CVRS designated representative.

1.3 Work to be Done: Contractor shall perform all work necessary to maintain the CVRS motorist call box systems in a satisfactory manner. Unless otherwise provided, Contractor shall furnish all materials, equipment, tools, labor and incidentals necessary to complete the services for the specified flat fee.

1.4 Rights of Entry and Permits: Contractor shall be responsible for obtaining all rights of entry, encroachment permits and other licenses or permits required to perform the work hereunder.

1.5 Materials and Workmanship: All materials, parts and equipment furnished by Contractor shall be high grade and free from defects. Enclosures shall not be replaced with other of lesser quality as measured by paint brightness, and aluminum and/or coating integrity. Quality of work shall be in accordance with generally accepted standards. Materials and work quality shall be subject to the CVRS Project Manager’s or designated representative’s approval. Contractor shall be responsible for storing and maintaining materials in a manner that preserves their quality and fitness for use on the Project.

1.6 Labor: Only competent workers shall be employed for tasks under this Agreement. Any person found by CVRS to be incompetent, disorderly, working under the influence of alcohol or controlled substances, unsafe or otherwise objectionable shall be removed by Contractor and not re-employed for services on the Project.

1.7 Inspection: All performance (including services, materials, supplies, and equipment furnished or utilized in the performance of this Project) shall be subject to inspection and approval by the CVRS Project Manager or a designated representative. Any CVRS authorized representative shall have access to the local maintenance field office.

1.8 Condition of Site: Throughout the duration of the Project, Contractor shall keep call box sites clean and free of rubbish and debris (including removed pad material). Materials and equipment shall be removed from the site as soon as they are no longer needed.

1.9 Reuse of Parts: Contractor may reuse parts that have been damaged assuming Contractor is able to repair the parts so that the functionality is not degraded.

1.10 Reserve Inventory: Contractor is required to maintain that quantity of call box equipment, parts, and materials in stock in the local maintenance field office as may be necessary to fulfill its duties.

1.11 Storage of Materials: Contractor shall store call box housings, electronics, poles, and other appurtenances within Contractor’s maintenance facilities.

1.12 Communication: Contractor shall ensure that the field supervisor has the necessary communication devices for interacting efficiently with the CVRS Project Manager or other designated representatives. The devices to be provided include but are not limited to a cell phone, office phone, and e-mail services with the capability to send and receive Access or database equivalent files.

Section 2.0 – SYSTEM MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES

7

2.1 System Corrective Maintenance: Contractor shall perform corrective maintenance as needed on the call boxes. Corrective maintenance requires that the Contractor provide an answering point connected to the California Highway Patrol (CHP) or other designated answering center that reports out-of-service call boxes to the Contractor. Corrective maintenance includes all repairs to the call box associated with electronics, transceivers, power supply (battery and solar panels) and the interface with the cellular system. Upon notification that a call box is out of service from a member of the public, CHP, an answering center, CVRS, or the maintenance computer, Contractor shall determine the cause, and if due to general failure of the call box, Contractor shall take the necessary action to restore it to a good operating condition, including the repair or replacement of parts, components and mounting as needed. Activities and repairs falling within “corrective maintenance” as described under this subsection 2.1 shall be performed and the call boxes shall be repaired and placed back in service by 4:00 PM on the same day for events reports by 8:00 AM on a work day. For events reported after 8:00 AM, the call boxes shall be placed back in service by 4:00 PM on the following work day. For events reported on a holiday or weekend, the call boxes shall be placed back in service by 4:00 PM on the first work day following the notification of the event. Contractor shall provide management and field staff sufficient to perform repairs on call boxes within the established time period. Upon receipt of error reports (e.g. cellular error, maintenance calls greater than five minutes, etc.) from CVRS, Contractor shall respond no later than 15 days after receipt of such error report to the CVRS Project Manager in writing explaining the errors and the corrective measures taken to resolve the errors. In addition, Contractor shall work with the call box answering contractor to identify call boxes with a high volume of “no caller” calls (a.k.a. run-away call boxes). Those “run-away” call boxes shall fall under the “corrective maintenance” designation under subsection 2.1 and be repaired or replaced on the same schedule to prevent an excessive amount of “no-caller” phone call volume. 2.2 System Preventative Maintenance: Contractor shall perform a “preventative maintenance” field visit to each call box at least twice a year at approximately six month intervals as necessary to keep call boxes clean and operational. Contractor shall also include in the proposal submitted to CVRS an option, including any reduction in cost, for annual (once a year) “preventative maintenance.” Contractor shall notify the call answering center supervisor at the commencement of a major preventative maintenance cycle when a large portion of the call answering center’s staff time will be required. The preventative maintenance activities shall include the following tasks:

• Cleaning and painting of call box housing as necessary; • Replacement or addition of outdated, damaged, or missing instruction placards and

vandalism stickers; • Inspection and anti-corrosion treatment of external electrical connections; • Operational check of call box controls and system operational sequence including add-on

features (including ATM, TTY and smart card), and call connect light including; -Removal of faceplate (as necessary) -Perform test calls; -Check outer door, handset and illumination for proper operation; -Check hook switch; and

8

-Check cellular antennae and cable. • Minor cleaning of the surrounding area of the call box (includes minor pruning, pulling of

weeds and debris removal); • Cleaning and bolt tightening for the call box sign; • Visual inspection of the solar panel orientation and cleaning of the solar panel collecting

surface; • Testing of the sonalert device by placing a call to the designated answering point and having

them initiate and terminate the 100+ decibel alarm; • Inspection and repair to the pedestrian pad; • Inspection of path for wear and tear or vandalism (report results to CVRS Project Manager

who will determine the appropriate course of action); and • Maintenance of the call box mounting pedestals or other devices used for mounting the call

boxes on sound walls and bridge railings. 2.3 System Knockdown, Vandalism, and Other Events: Maintenance, repairs and/or replacements required as a result of damage by acts of nature (including ant intrusion, but excluding lightning, fire or flood), vandalism, or other willful acts, collisions and other accidents and other such causes will be performed by Contractor. If any such maintenance, repairs, and/or replacements, are required as a result of lightning, fire, or flood, Contractor shall be compensated for all such work on a time and materials basis in accordance with Exhibit “E”, Universal Price List. For work under this subsection 2.3, if no foundation work is required, Contractor shall have the call box placed back in service by 4:00 PM on the same day for events reported by 8:00 AM on a work day. For events reported after 8:00 AM where no foundation work is required, the call boxes shall be placed back in service by 4:00 PM the following work day. If foundation work is required, Contractor shall have the call box placed back in service by 4:00 PM on the second work day following the notification. For events reported on a holiday or weekend, the call box shall be placed back in service by 4:00 PM on the first work day following notification of the event if no foundation work is required or by 4:00 PM on the second work day following notification of the event if foundation work is required. 2.4 System Temporary Removals and Reinstallations: Contractor agrees to temporarily remove call boxes from existing locations on an as-needed basis to accommodate freeway construction and other projects at the request of CVRS. CVRS retains ownership for call boxes authorized from removal, and Contractor shall make all removed call boxes available for reinstallation. Relocation of a call box will include, but is not limited to, removing the call box and mounting from its existing location and installing it at a new location as directed by CVRS. Contractor shall coordinate the removal, de-activation, and storage of call boxes as requested by Caltrans or the CVRS Project Manager. 2.5 Reinstallations/Deferred Installations Coordination: Contractor shall coordinate the removal, de-activation, and storage of call boxes as requested by Caltrans or the CVRS Project Manager. Contractor shall also maintain proper inventory documentation and coordinate siting, reinstallation and deferred installation tasks including permitting, site approval, installation and activation. Contractor shall coordinate activities to expedite the reinstallation of call box sites after Caltrans construction projects are completed. Contractor is not responsible for design work should any be necessary for the reinstallation of call boxes at new locations from its existing location and installing it as a new location as directed by CVRS.

9

Section 3.0 – SYSTEM MANAGEMENT 3.1 Call Box System Database Maintenance and Updates: Contractor shall maintain an accurate, up-to-date database containing system specifications detailed in Exhibit “F”, System Installation Report Specification. In addition to the delivery of the database products described below, Contractor shall provide remote access of the database and maintenance management systems to CVRS and the CVRS designated Management Information System (MIS) consultant. Contractor shall also maintain an accurate up-to-date database containing information of the CVRS system as detailed in Exhibit “G”, System Database Specifications. Contractor shall provide CVRS with remote access to this information in an Access database file or similar compatible database file format. The call box system database shall include the following maintenance information:

• Description of all corrective maintenance visits including the call box sign number, date and time of work issue date, date and time of visit, and date and time work completed (if different from the first visit) and description of work performed;

• Description of preventative maintenance visits including the call box sign number, date and time of visit, and description of work performed if it deviates from the standard preventative maintenance requirements.

• Description of other site work including, but not limited to the following: knockdowns; vandalism; sign repair; other repairs; site repairs; CHP reported; permanent removals, temporary removals; reinstalled; and pad replacements. These entries should also include work issue date and time (alarm date where applicable), site visit date and time, sign number, date and time of completion, information on parts replaced or repaired, labor expended and equipment used.

• Monthly summary report with the number of call box calls that were blocked by the cellular system or encountered a “system busy” response from the cellular network.

Contractor shall ensure that all information relating to the changes in system components are included in the CVRS database. This information includes, but is not limited to, controller card type, electronic serial number, transceiver model and type. As part of database reporting, Contractor shall provide call box pictures electronically and provide updated and complete latitude and longitude data. Contractor shall furnish all equipment and materials necessary to provide this data. Note: Proposers shall describe any proprietary limitations or requirements associated with providing the services in this Section 3.0. Throughout the development of specifications for the maintenance system management software upgrades, Contractor will obtain input from CVRS staff. During the approval period, CVRS and Contractor shall evaluate and revise the method as mutually agreeable. Deliverable #1: Deliver quarterly an electronic file, or make the file available online, of the

10

entire System Installed Report Specifications (as defined in Exhibit F) in ASCII format to the CHP Communications Centers in Sacramento, Stockton, and Chico and CVRS’s designated MIS consultant on the first Wednesday of each January, April, July, and October, beginning in October 2013. Other updates shall be furnished upon request. Deliverable #2: Deliver monthly an electronic file of the entire Call Box System database (as defined in Exhibit G) to CVRS, and CVRS’s designated MIS consultant, and CVRS’s designated inspector. Monthly update of call box system database to CVRS shall occur on the first Wednesday of each month, starting in October 2013. Section 4.0 – FINAL FIELD SURVEY AND SITE APPROVAL COORDINATION Contractor shall be the primary point of contact for Caltrans permit issues related to system maintenance and shall coordinate final field surveys and field review meetings to approve or modify call box locations with Caltrans, CHP, and CVRS. Contractor shall prepare and submit encroachment permit applications to Caltrans, as required. Contractor shall work with the CVRS Project Manager to secure blanket removal/installation permits for the regional call box system maintenance program, using Exhibit H, System Operation and Site Condition Form. Section 5.0 – MAINTENANCE FEES The concept of this agreement is that ‘system’ call box services are more efficiently provided using a compensation arrangement based on a monthly “per call box” fee for all maintenance (subsections 2.1 and 2.2), repair of knockdown, vandalism, and other event damage (subsection 2.3), and removals, both temporary and permanent, and reinstalls (subsections 2.4 and 2.5) of all call boxes in the ‘system’ (collectively “Task 1.”) Certain exceptions to included services are specified in subsection 5.2 below. 5.1 Per Call Box Fee: Each proposer shall propose a monthly “per call box” fee for each year of the Agreement, as well as any reduction in cost for permanent removal of call boxes, using the Price Proposal Form attached hereto as Exhibit “C.” The “per call box” fee and reduction in cost shall include all materials, labor, transportation, taxes, fees and other cost incurred to complete the required work. Payment of the fee for all maintenance and services described above will be as follows: Fees will be invoiced and paid in arrears monthly and will be based on the number of call boxes maintained, in service, or removed the invoiced month. 5.2 Exceptions: Knockdown Assumptions: It is assumed that the number of annual knockdown events under subsection 2.3 will be no more than ten percent (10%) of the installed call boxes in a contract year. If the annual knockdown percentage exceeds 10% in a particular contract year, CVRS shall compensate the Contractor in accordance with Exhibit “E”, Universal Price List, for repair of additional knockdown events occurring that year. The knockdown percentage will be calculated as the number of knockdowns in any contract year divided by the average in-service call boxes for that year. The number of in-service call boxes will be determined on the last day of each month from data contained in the CVRS maintenance management computer/database, as maintained by Contractor. Contractor shall invoice CVRS for any additional knockdown

11

events on the first invoice following the end of each contract year. Temporary Removal and Reinstallation Assumptions: It is assumed that the number of annual temporary removal events and reinstallation events under subsection 2.4 will be no more than fifteen percent (15%) of the installed call boxes in a contract year. If the temporary removal and reinstallation percentage exceeds 15% in a particular contract year, CVRS shall compensate the Contractor in accordance with Exhibit “E”, Universal Price List, for each additional removal or reinstallation event occurring that year. The removal and reinstallation percentage will be calculated as the number of removals and reinstallations in any contract year divided by the average in-service call boxes plus the number of temporary removals for that year. The number of in-service call boxes will be determined on the last day of each month from data contained in the CVRS maintenance management computer/database as maintained by Contractor. Contractor shall invoice CVRS for events exceeding the annual permitted average on the first invoice following the end of each contract year. The parties agree that installation of call boxes that already have been removed as of the beginning of the contract year shall not count as reinstallations for the purpose of calculating the foregoing percentage. “Non-like” reinstallations shall mean reinstallations that are of a different site type than the site type installed at the location at the time of the removal request. For non-like reinstallations of greater cost, CVRS shall pay Contractor the difference between the existing site installation cost and the new site installation cost in accordance with Exhibit “E”, Universal Price List. Contractor shall perform call box reinstallations at like sites or sites of equivalent or lesser cost as part of the flat fee compensation, except as noted above when the annual percentage of expected removal/reinstallation events is exceeded. Contractor shall invoice CVRS for non-like, greater cost reinstallation events on the first invoice following the end of each contract month. Section 6.0 – TIME AND MATERIALS For services outside of the scope of work, Contractor shall be compensated on a time and materials basis, based on the Universal Price List shown in Exhibit “E”, but only as expressly provided in Section 5.0 above or as requested in writing by CVRS. The Universal Price List is subject to annual adjustments, as provided therein. For services performed on “smart” call boxes, Contractor shall be compensated as provided in Exhibit “E”, Universal Price List. Task 2: Selected Call Box Site Permanent Removals A certain number of call box sites will be removed as part of CVRS’s efforts to provide cost-effective services in light of a significantly reduced call volume. The sites will be primarily located along urban freeways. Paired call boxes will be permanently removed, with the result that call box spacing along the selected routes will increase. The selected vendor will take all actions necessary to remove the call box, pole, auger and other equipment from each site, where necessary demolish any retaining walls or asphalt paths, and perform minor grading and cleanup work to leave each site as close to its original condition as possible. We do not anticipate the need to import soil or landscape the demolished site to accomplish the above. The selected vendor will be responsible for disposing of any waste materials.

12

The selected vendor must disassemble the call box, solar panel, antenna, signs and other equipment, as well as the site itself, and dispose of the same, unless otherwise directed by the CVRS. Please include an estimate of the reduction in maintenance fees expected per call box and per percentage (including fractions thereof) of call boxes permanently removed. Should the proposer have any recommendations for other uses for this equipment that would financially benefit the CVRS, please include those in your response and provide your estimate of the financial benefit. Any such recommendations may be considered among the factors for selection of the maintenance operations contractor.

Project Schedule CVRS’s goal is the full transition of call box maintenance operations under this new agreement by December 31, 2013.

VI. CONTACT PERSONS CVRS Project Manager Mark Heiman 1415 L Street, Suite 300 Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 340-6232 [email protected] VII. PROJECT TIMETABLE May 17, 2013 Issue Request for Proposals May 24, 2013 Deadline for Written Questions or Requests for

Changes to RFP or contract terms May 31, 2013 Response to Written Questions or Requests for

Changes to RFP or contract terms; RFP Amendment or Addenda, if necessary

June 7, 2013 @ 4:00 p.m. PDT Closing date for receipt of proposals June 20, 2013 Finalists contacted to schedule interviews, if any June 26-27, 2013 Conduct interviews (if needed); recommend

contractor August 15, 2013 Contract award August 23, 2013 Negotiate and execute contract August 26, 2013 Start of Project/Begin Work

mailto:[email protected]

13

Proposals must be received by CVRS, in both hard copy and electronic form as further described below, no later than 4:00 p.m. PDT on June 7, 2013. If mail delivery is used, the proposer should mail the proposal early enough to provide for receipt by CVRS by this deadline. Proposer uses mail or courier service at their own risk. CVRS will not be liable or responsible for any late delivery of proposals. Proposers shall submit one originally signed proposal in a sealed envelope or package clearly marked “Proposal for CVRS Call Box Maintenance and Selected Site Removals.” The Proposal must also be submitted in electronic version via e-mail to the Project Manager, as further specified in Section IX below. VIII. GENERAL CONDITIONS A. Limitations This request for proposal (RFP) does not commit CVRS to award a contract, to pay any costs incurred in the preparation of proposals in response to this request, or to procure or contract for services or supplies. CVRS expressly reserves the right to reject any and all proposals or to waive any irregularity or informality in any proposal or in the RFP procedure and to be the sole judge of the responsibility of any proposer and of the suitability of the materials and/or services to be rendered. CVRS reserves the right to withdraw this RFP at any time without prior notice. Further, CVRS reserves the right to modify the RFP schedule described above. Until award of a contract, the proposals shall be held in confidence and shall not be available for public review. No proposal shall be returned after the date and time set for the opening thereof. All proposals become the property of CVRS. Upon award of a contract to the successful proposer, all proposals shall be public records. B. Award CVRS may ask RFP finalists to present oral briefings of their proposals and qualifications. All finalists may be required to participate in negotiations and submit such price, technical, or other revisions of their proposals as may result from negotiations. CVRS also reserves the right to award the contract without oral briefings or discussion, based upon the initial written proposals. Accordingly, each initial proposal should be submitted on the most favorable terms from a price and a technical viewpoint. C. RFP Addendum Any changes to the RFP requirements will be made by written addenda issued by CVRS and shall be considered part of the RFP. Upon issuance, such addenda shall be incorporated in the agreement documents, and shall prevail over inconsistent provisions of earlier issued documentation. D. Verbal Agreement or Conversation No prior, current, or post award verbal conversations or agreement(s) with any officer, agent, or employee of CVRS shall affect or modify any terms or obligations of the RFP, or any contract

14

resulting from this RFP. E. Precontractual Expense Precontractual expenses include any expenses incurred by proposers and selected contractor in: 1. Preparing proposals in response to this RFP 2. Submitting proposals to CVRS 3. Negotiations with CVRS on any matter related to proposals. 4. Other expenses incurred by a contractor or proposer prior to the date of award of any

agreement. In any event, CVRS shall not be liable for any precontractual expenses incurred by any proposer or selected contractor. Proposers shall not include any such expenses as part of the price proposed in response to this RFP. CVRS shall be held harmless and free from any and all liability, claims, or expenses whatsoever incurred by, or on behalf of, any person or organization responding to this RFP. F. Signature The proposal will also provide the following information: name, title, address and telephone number of individual with authority to bind the consultant or consultant firm and also who may be contacted during the period of proposal evaluation. The proposal shall be signed by an official authorized to bind the consultant or consulting firm and shall contain a statement to the effect that the proposal is a firm offer for at least a one-hundred and twenty (120) day period. Award and execution of the contract is expected by August 23, 2013. G. Contract Arrangements The successful consultant is expected to execute a contract similar to CVRS’s Standard Agreement. A copy of CVRS’s Standard Agreement is attached as Exhibit “A” which meets the requirements of all applicable laws, regulations and ordinances. While $1 million per occurrence in commercial general liability coverage is required, under special circumstances CVRS may consider a lesser amount of insurance coverage, but not an amount less than $500,000 per occurrence. The consultant must agree to comply with all the requirements imposed by all applicable laws, regulations, and ordinances. Equal Employment Opportunity: In connection with the performance of the contract, the consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, age, creed, sex or national original. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation, and selection for training, including apprenticeship. Consultants and consultant firms submitting proposals in response to this RFP must disclose to

15

CVRS any actual, apparent, or potential conflicts of interest that may exist relative to the services to be provided under Agreement for consultant services to be awarded pursuant to this RFP. If the consultant or firm has no conflict of interest, a statement to that effect shall be included in the proposal. IX. PROPOSAL CONTENT AND ORGANIZATION Proposals should be limited to specific discussion of the elements outlined in this RFP. The intent of this RFP is to encourage responses which meet the stated requirements, and which propose the best methods to accomplish the work within the stated budget. The organization of the proposal should follow the general outline below. Each proposal should consist of a technical proposal (items 1-7 below) and a cost proposal (item 8). Form of Proposals: Proposals must be submitted in both hard copy and electronic form to Mark Heiman, 1415 L Street, Suite 300, Sacramento, CA, [email protected], 916-340-6232 no later than the closing date and time and with the proper number of copies, as specified in Section VII above. The electronic form shall be a PDF version of the fully signed Proposal, including all attachments, and shall be e-mailed to the Project Manager. 1. Transmittal Letter The transmittal letter should include the name, title, address, phone number, and original signature of an individual with authority to negotiate on behalf of and to contractually bind the consultant or consulting firm, and who may be contacted during the period of proposal evaluation. The transmittal letter shall also contain a statement that the Proposer agrees to provide CVRS with any other information that CVRS determines is necessary for an accurate determination of Proposer’s ability to perform services as proposed. Only one transmittal letter need be prepared to accompany all copies of the technical and cost proposals. 2. Table of Contents A listing of the major sections in the proposal and the associated page numbers. 3. Introduction In this section, the proposer should demonstrate an adequate understanding of (i) the purpose of the project and (ii) the role and relationships of CVRS, CHP, Caltrans and the call box maintenance Contractor, based upon the Proposer’s experience operating call box maintenance services.

mailto:[email protected]

16

4. Technical Approach This section should include:

a. A description of the Proposer’s approach to completing each task specified in the Scope of Work.

b. A sequential outline of the activities that will be undertaken in completing the specified tasks.

c. Identification of the methods Proposer would use to ensure quality control as well as schedule and budget control for the project.

Proposer must provide complete but concise answers on the Technical Approach. Where helpful, charts, graphs or tables may be included, but should not be used as the entire response. CVRS understands that Proposers may have performed many of the tasks required herein in providing call box maintenance services for existing or prior call box program customers. To the extent that Proposers believe their existing facilities, staffing, management, equipment, etc. will meet the requirements of this RFP, they should so state in their Proposal where appropriate. In general, CVRS understands that all Proposers who meet the Minimum Qualifications provide or have provided call box maintenance services. CVRS is therefore most interested in learning how a Proposer would effectively add CVRS maintenance services to the Proposer’s existing maintenance services. 5. Project Management; Staff Qualifications The proposer must prepare an explanation of the project management system and practices to be used to ensure quality control as well as schedule and budget control for the project. If the proposal is a team effort involving subcontractors and/or partners, the distribution of work among team members should be indicated. Please discuss the Proposer’s organization, how work assignments are structured, and the staffing plan, including the individual who will have project management responsibilities. The staffing plan should include an organizational chart showing the manager and all project staff, their roles and responsibilities, and the reporting structure. The proposal must describe the qualifications and experience of each professional who will participate in the project, including a resume for each member of the project team. 6. Subcontractor Information If Proposer plans to subcontract any portion of the services described in the Scope of Work, include a written justification for subcontracting. Attach a statement from each subcontractor, signed by a duly authorized officer, employee, or agent of the subcontractor, that includes: the name and address of the organization; the type of work to be performed; the percentage or portion of the total work to be performed; and that the subcontractor will perform the work as indicated. This information will be used to determine the responsibility of the Proposer. The Contractor remains responsible for the performance of the entire contract and scope of work.

17

7. Consultant Qualifications and References; Other Requirements The proposal must describe the nature and outcome of qualifying call box maintenance services currently or previously conducted by the consultant. Descriptions should include client contact names, address, phone numbers, descriptions of the type of work performed, approximate dates on which the work was completed, and professional staff who performed the work. If a subcontractor is proposed, two to three similar qualifications and references should be provided for the subcontractor. Proposers may provide up to two samples of a written call box maintenance report prepared by the Proposer for a current client. The proposer must also complete the Levine Act Disclosure Statement attached hereto as Exhibit "B." The Proposer must also submit evidence of the ability to provide insurance in the amounts and coverage as stated in the attached Agreement, under Insurance Requirements. 8. Cost Proposal The cost proposal shall include a per call box monthly fee as described in the Scope of Work for Task 1 (Call Box Maintenance), broken down by each contract year, and the per site fee as described in the Scope of Work for Task 2 (Selected Call Box Site Permanent Removals). A Price Proposal Form (Exhibit C) must be submitted with the Proposal. For Task 1, proposers may propose reasonable cost increases for succeeding contract year. X. PROPOSAL EVALUATION AND SELECTION A proposal review panel made up of members of CVRS staff will evaluate the proposals. Proposers may be telephoned and asked for further information, if necessary, and may be expected to appear for oral interviews. Previous clients may also be called. The panel will make recommendations to the CVRS Chief Executive Officer on the basis of the proposal, oral interview, if any, and reference check. The final selection will be made by the CVRS Chief Executive Officer, whose decision is final and not subject to protest. CVRS reserves the right to select a consultant based solely on written proposals and not convene oral interviews. Upon receipt of the proposals, a technical evaluation will be performed. Each of the major sections of the proposal will be reviewed and evaluated with criteria designed to help judge the quality of the proposal. Any recommendations for other uses of removed equipment that would financially benefit CVRS may be considered among the factors for selection of the maintenance operations contractor; attach a written offer, if desired, to the Price Proposal Form in Exhibit C. Evaluation criteria will include such considerations as:

• Understanding of the background and requirements of the project. • The overall and technical approaches to be followed and the tasks to be performed,

including detailed steps and resources required and proposed project schedule. • The relative allocation of resources, in terms of quality and quantity, to key tasks

including the time and skills of personnel assigned to the tasks and consultant’s

18

approach to managing resources and project output. • Cost analysis and justification. • Education, training, and experience of proposed personnel.

XI. PAYMENT SCHEDULE The consultant will be paid in arrears, based upon the payment schedule agreed to in the contract. The consultant should forward a copy of all invoices for payment for work performed and associated expenses by the 15th day of the following month. At CVRS’s discretion, CVRS may withhold ten percent (10%) of the payments until the successful completion of the project and the delivery and acceptance of all final products.

19

EXHIBIT “A” CAPITOL VALLEY REGIONAL SAFE

STANDARD AGREEMENT

THIS AGREEMENT, is made and entered into this _____ day of _____, 20 , at Sacramento, California, by and between the Capitol Valley Regional Service Authority for Freeways and Expressways, a joint powers agency (hereinafter “CVRS”), through its duly appointed Chief Executive Officer, and _____________________, a (hereinafter “Contractor”).

RECITALS:

1. Contractor represents that it is specially trained and/or has the experience and expertise necessary to competently perform the services set forth in this Agreement; and

2. Contractor is willing to perform the services and work described in this Agreement under the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement; and

3. CVRS desires to contract with Contractor to perform the services and work described in this Agreement under the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

1. Time of Performance: Contractor shall commence work upon execution of this Agreement and in accordance with the Scope of Work, attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein. Contractor shall complete work as expeditiously as is consistent with generally accepted standards of professional skill and care and the orderly progress of work. Work shall be completed and this Agreement shall expire on _____________, unless otherwise terminated as provided for in this Agreement or extended by written agreement between the parties.

2. Scope of Work: Contractor agrees to fully perform the work described in Exhibit “A” - Scope of Work. In the event of any inconsistency between Exhibit “A” and other terms and conditions of this Agreement, Exhibit “A” shall control. CVRS reserves the right to review and approve all work to be performed by Contractor in relation to this Agreement. Any proposed amendment to the Scope of Work must be submitted by Contractor in writing for prior review and approval by CVRS's Chief Executive Officer. Approval shall not be presumed unless such approval is made by CVRS in writing.

3. Standard of Quality: All work performed by Contractor under this Agreement shall be in accordance with all applicable legal requirements and shall meet the standard of quality ordinarily to be expected of competent professionals in Contractor's field of expertise.

4. Compliance with Laws: Contractor shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, codes, ordinances, regulations, orders and decrees. Contractor warrants and represents to CVRS that Contractor shall, at its own cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at

20

all times during the term of this Agreement, any licenses, permits, insurance and approvals that are legally required for Contractor to practice its profession or are necessary and incident to the performance of the services and work Contractor performs under this Agreement. Contractor shall provide written proof of such licenses, permits, insurance and approvals upon request by CVRS. CVRS is not responsible or liable for Contractor's failure to comply with any or all of the requirements contained in this paragraph.

5. Consideration: Payment to Contractor by CVRS shall be made as set forth in Exhibit “A.” The amount to be paid to Contractor under this Agreement shall not exceed ___________ dollars ($__________), unless expressly authorized in writing by the CVRS Chief Executive Officer. In no instance shall CVRS be liable for any payments or costs for work in excess of this amount, nor for any unauthorized or ineligible costs. Contractor shall be paid at the times and in the manner set forth in this Agreement. The consideration to be paid Contractor, as provided in this Agreement, shall be in compensation for all of Contractor’s expenses incurred in the performance of work under this Agreement, including travel and per diem, unless otherwise expressly so provided.

6. Reporting and Payment:

a. Contractor shall submit monthly billings in arrears to CVRS no later than the 15th of each month and in accordance with the Scope of Work. Contractor shall be notified within fifteen (15) working days following receipt of its invoice by CVRS of any circumstances or data identified by CVRS in Contractor’s written billing which would cause withholding of approval and subsequent payment. Contractor shall be paid within thirty (30) days after CVRS approval of each billing; however, CVRS, at its own discretion, may withhold at least ten percent (10%) of each invoice until the successful completion of the scope of work and the delivery and acceptance by CVRS of all final products. Said billings shall indicate reimbursable costs incurred to the date of such billing since the date of the preceding billing, if any. The billings shall include documentation of reimbursable expenses and billed items sufficient for CVRS, in its opinion, to substantiate billings. CVRS reserves the right to withhold payment of disputed amounts.

Optional:

b. CVRS shall reimburse Contractor for actual expenditures limited to costs for services or purchase of items identified in the line-item budget set forth in Exhibit “A” - Scope of Work, or approved in writing by CVRS.

7. Independent Contractor: Contractor, and the agents and employees of Contractor, in the performance of this Agreement, shall act as and be independent contractors and not officers or employees or agents of CVRS. Contractor, its officers, employees, agents, and subcontractors, if any, shall have no power to bind or commit CVRS to any decision or course of action, and shall not represent to any person or business that they have such power. Contractor has and shall retain the right to exercise full control of the supervision of the services and work and over the employment, direction, compensation and discharge of all persons assisting Contractor in the performance of services under this Agreement. Contractor shall be solely

21

responsible for all matters relating to the payment of its employees, including but not limited to compliance with social security and income tax withholding, workers' compensation insurance and all regulations governing such matters.

8. Termination:

a. CVRS shall have the right to terminate this Agreement for any reason, with or without cause, at any time, by giving Contractor fifteen (15) days written notice. The notice shall be deemed served and effective for all purposes on the date it is deposited in the U.S. mail, certified, return receipt requested, addressed to Contractor at the address indicated in Section 17.

b. If CVRS issues a notice of termination:

(1) Contractor shall immediately cease rendering services pursuant to this Agreement.

(2) Contractor shall deliver to CVRS copies of all Writings, whether or not completed, which were prepared by Contractor, its employees or its subcontractors, if any, pursuant to this Agreement. The term “Writings” shall include, but not be limited to, handwriting, typesetting, computer files and records, drawings, blueprints, printing, photostatting, photographs, and every other means of recording upon any tangible thing, any form of communication or representation, including, letters, works, pictures, sounds, symbols computer data, or combinations thereof.

(3) CVRS shall pay Contractor for work actually performed up to the effective date of the notice of termination, subject to the limitations in Section 5, less any compensation to CVRS for damages suffered as a result of Contractor's failure to comply with the terms of this Agreement. Such payment shall be in accordance with Section 6. However, if this Agreement is terminated because the work of Contractor does not meet the terms or standards specified in this Agreement, then CVRS shall be obligated to compensate Contractor only for that portion of Contractor's services which is of benefit to CVRS.

9. Assignment: The parties understand that CVRS entered into this Agreement based on the professional expertise and reputation of Contractor. Therefore, without the prior express written consent of CVRS, this Agreement is not assignable by Contractor either in whole or in part.

10. Binding Agreement: This Agreement shall be binding on the parties hereto, their assigns, successors, administrators, executors, and other representatives.

11. Time: Time is of the essence in this Agreement.

12. Amendments: No alteration or variation of the terms of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by the parties hereto, and no oral understanding or agreement not incorporated herein, shall be binding on any of the parties hereto.

13. Contractors and Subcontractors: Contractor shall not subcontract any portion of the work without the prior express written authorization of CVRS. If CVRS consents to a subcontract, Contractor shall be fully responsible for all work performed by the subcontractor.

22

a. CVRS reserves the right to review and approve any contract or agreement to be funded in whole or in part using funds provided under this Agreement.

b. Any contract or sub-contract shall require the contractor and its subcontractors, if any, to:

(1) Comply with applicable State and Federal requirements that pertain to, among other things, labor standards, non-discrimination, the Americans with Disabilities Act, Equal Employment Opportunity, and Drug-Free Workplace.

(2) Maintain at least the minimum State-required Workers’ Compensation Insurance for those employees who will perform the work or any part of it.

(3) Maintain unemployment insurance and disability insurance as required by law, along with liability insurance in an amount to be determined by CVRS that is reasonable to compensate any person, firm, or corporation who may be injured or damaged by Contractor or any subcontractor in performing work associated with this Agreement or any part of it.

(4) Retain all books, records, accounts, documentation, and all other materials relevant to this Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of termination of this Agreement, or three (3) years from the conclusion or resolution of any and all audits or litigation relevant to this Agreement and any amendments, whichever is later.

(5) Permit CVRS and/or its representatives, upon reasonable notice, unrestricted access to any or all books, records, accounts, documentation, and all other materials relevant to this Agreement for the purpose of monitoring, auditing, or otherwise examining said materials.

14. Indemnity: Contractor specifically agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless CVRS, its directors, officers, agents, and employees (the “Indemnitees”) from and against any and all actions, claims, demands, losses, expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees and costs, damages, and liabilities resulting from injury or death to a person or injury to property arising out of or in any way connected with the performance of this Agreement, however caused, regardless of any negligent act of an Indemnitee, whether active or passive, excepting only such injury or death as may be caused by the sole, active negligence or willful misconduct of an Indemnittee. Contractor shall pay all costs that may be incurred by CVRS in enforcing this indemnity, including reasonable attorneys' fees. The provisions of this Section shall survive the expiration, termination or assignment of this Agreement.

15. Insurance Requirements: Contractor hereby warrants that it carries and shall maintain, at its sole cost and expense, in full force and effect during the full term of this Agreement and any extensions to this Agreement, the following described insurance coverage:

POLICY

MINIMUM LIMITS OF LIABILITY

23

(1) Workers’ Compensation; Employer’s Liability.

Statutory requirements for Workers’ Compensation; $ 1,000,000 Employers’ Liability.

(2) Comprehensive Automobile: Insurance Services Office, form #CA 0001 (Ed 1/87) covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto).

Bodily Injury/Property Damage $2,000,000 each accident.

(3) General Liability: Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence form CG 0001).

$5,000,000 per occurrence. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit, such limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.

(4) Errors and Omissions/Professional Liability (errors and omissions liability insurance appropriate to the Contractor’s profession as defined by CVRS).

$1,000,000 per claim.

a. Deductibles and Self-insured Retentions: Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by CVRS.

b. Required Provisions: The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:

(1) For any claims related to this Agreement, Contractor’s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects CVRS, its directors, officers, employees and agents. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by CVRS, its directors, officers, employees or agents shall be in excess of Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute to it.

(2) Any failure by Contractor to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warrants shall not affect coverage provided to CVRS, its directors, officers, employees or agents.

(3) Contractor's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability.

(4) Each insurance policy required by this Agreement shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days’ prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested has been given to CVRS.

24

c. Acceptability of Insurers: Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise approved by CVRS.

d. Certificate of Insurance and Additional Insured Requirement: Contractor shall furnish to CVRS an original Certificate of Insurance on a standard ACORD form, or other form acceptable to CVRS, substantiating the required coverages and limits set forth above and also containing the following:

(1) Thirty (30) days prior written notice to CVRS of the cancellation, non-renewal or reduction in coverage of any policy listed on the Certificate; and

(2) The following statement with respect to the Commercial General Liability policy: “CVRS and its directors, officers, agents and employees, are made additional insureds, but only insofar as the operations under this Agreement are concerned.”

e. Certified Copies of Policies: Upon request by CVRS, Contractor shall immediately furnish a complete copy of any policy required hereunder, including all endorsements, with said copy certified by the insurance company to be a true and correct copy of the original policy.

f. Contractor’s Responsibility: Nothing herein shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Contractor may be held responsible for damages resulting from Contractor’s operations, acts, omissions, or negligence. Insurance coverage obtained in the minimum amounts specified above shall not relieve Contractor of liability in excess of such minimum coverage, nor shall it preclude CVRS from taking other actions available to it under this Agreement or by law, including but not limited to, actions pursuant to Contractor’s indemnity obligations.

16. Audit, Retention and Inspection of Records:

a. CVRS or its designee shall have the right to review, obtain, and copy all books, records, computer records, accounts, documentation and any other materials (collectively referred to as “Records”) pertaining to performance of this Agreement, including any Records in the possession of any subcontractors. Contractor agrees to provide CVRS or its designee with any relevant information requested and shall permit CVRS or its designees access to its premises, upon reasonable notice, during normal business hours, for the purpose of interviewing employees and inspecting and copying Records for the purpose of determining compliance with Public Contract Code § 10115 et seq., Government Code § 8546.7, 2 California Code of Regulations § 1896.60 et seq. and any applicable federal laws and regulations. Contractor further agrees to maintain such Records for a period of three (3) years after final payment under the Agreement.

b. Contractor shall comply with the caveats and be aware of the penalties for violations of fraud and for obstruction of investigation as set forth in Public Utilities Code section 10115.10.

c. An expenditure that is not authorized by this Agreement or that cannot be adequately documented shall be disallowed and must be reimbursed to CVRS within sixty (60) days of the discovery unless CVRS approves in writing an alternative repayment plan. Expenditures for work activities not described in the Scope of Work shall be deemed authorized if the performance of such activities is approved in writing by CVRS prior to the commencement of

25

such activity.

d. Absent fraud or mistake on the part of CVRS, the determination by CVRS of the allowability of any expenditure shall be final.

e. If so directed by CVRS upon expiration of this Agreement, Contractor shall cause all Records relevant to the Scope of Work to be delivered to CVRS as depository.

17. Project Manager:

CVRS’s project manager for this Agreement is Mark Heiman, unless CVRS otherwise informs Contractor. Any notice, report, or other communication required by this Agreement shall be mailed by first-class mail to the CVRS Project Manager at the following address:

Mark Heiman Sacramento Area Council of Governments 1415 “L” Street, Suite 300 Sacramento, California 95814 Contractor’s project manager for this Agreement is ________________________. No substitution of Contractor’s project manager is permitted without the prior written agreement by CVRS. With the exception of notice pursuant to Section 8(a) above, any notice, report, or other communication to Contractor required by this Agreement shall be mailed by first-class mail to:

Name, Title Contractor Address Address

18. Successors: This Agreement shall be binding on the parties hereto, their assigns, successors, administrators, executors, and other representatives.

19. Waivers: No waiver of any breach of this Agreement shall be held to be a waiver of any prior or subsequent breach. The failure of CVRS to enforce at any time the provisions of this Agreement or to require at any time performance by Contractor of these provisions, shall in no way be construed to be a waiver of such provisions nor to affect the validity of this Agreement or the right of CVRS to enforce these provisions.

20. Litigation: Contractor shall notify CVRS immediately of any claim or action undertaken by it or against it that affects or may affect this Agreement or CVRS, and shall take such action with respect to the claim or action as is consistent with the terms of this Agreement and the interests of CVRS.

21. National Labor Relations Board Certification: Contractor, by signing this Agreement, does swear under penalty of perjury that no more than one final unappealable finding of contempt of court by a federal court has been issued against Contractor within the immediately preceding two-year period because of Contractor’s failure to comply with an order of a federal court which orders Contractor to comply with an order of the National Labor

26

Relations Board (Public Contract Code § 10296).

22. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990: By signing this Agreement, Contractor assures CVRS that it complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 (42 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq.), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability, as well as all applicable regulations and guidelines issued pursuant to the ADA.

23. Nondiscrimination Clause:

a. During the performance of this Agreement, Contractor and its subcontractors shall not unlawfully discriminate, harass, or allow harassment, against any employee or applicant for employment because of sex, sexual orientation, race, color, ancestry, religion, national origin, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, age, or marital status. Contractor and its subcontractors shall insure that the evaluation and treatment of their employees and applicants for employment are free from such discrimination and harassment. Contractor and its subcontractors shall comply with the provisions of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (Government Code § 12900, et seq.) and the applicable regulations promulgated thereunder (California Code of Regulations, Title 2, § 7285.0, et seq.). The applicable regulations of the Fair Employment and Housing Commission implementing Government Code §§ 12990 (a-f), set forth in Chapter 5 of Division 4 of Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations, are incorporated into this Agreement by reference and made a part hereof as if set forth in full. Contractor and its subcontractors shall give written notice of their obligations under this clause to labor organizations with which they have a collective bargaining or other agreement.

b. Contractor shall include the non-discrimination and compliance provisions of this clause in all subcontracts to perform work under this Agreement.

24. Drug-Free Certification: By signing this Agreement, Contractor hereby certifies under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that Contractor will comply with the requirements of the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1990 (Government Code § 8350, et seq.) and will provide a drug-free workplace by taking the following actions:

a. Publish a statement notifying employees that unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensation, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited, and specifying actions to be taken against employees for violations.

b. Establish a Drug-Free Awareness Program to inform employees about:

(1) The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace;

(2) The person’s or the organization’s policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace;

(3) Any available counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs; and

(4) Penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations.

27

c. Every employee of Contractor who works under this Agreement will:

(1) Receive a copy of Contractor’s Drug-Free Workplace Policy Statement; and

(2) Agree to abide by the terms of Contractor’s Statement as a condition of employment on this Agreement.

25. Union Organizing: By signing this Agreement, Contractor hereby acknowledges the applicability of Government Code § 16645 through § 16649 to this Agreement, excluding § 16645.2 and § 16645.7.

a. Contractor will not assist, promote, or deter union organizing by employees performing work on this Agreement if such assistance, promotion, or deterrence contains a threat of reprisal or force, or a promise of benefit.

b. Contractor will not meet with employees or supervisors on CVRS or state property if the purpose of the meeting is to assist, promote, or deter union organizing, unless the property is equally available to the general public for meetings.

26. Other Responsibilities:

a. Conflicts of Interest: Contractor shall exercise reasonable care and diligence to prevent any actions or conditions that could result in a conflict with CVRS’s interest. During the term of this Agreement, Contractor shall not accept any employment or engage in any consulting work that would create a conflict of interest with CVRS or in any way compromise the services to be performed under this Agreement. Contractor shall immediately notify CVRS of any and all potential violations of this paragraph upon becoming aware of the potential violation.

b. Political Reform Act Compliance: Contractor is aware and acknowledges that certain contractors that perform work for governmental agencies are "consultants" under the Political Reform Act (the "Act") (Government Code § 81000, et seq.) and its implementing regulations ( 2 California Code of Regulations § 18110, et seq.). Contractor agrees that any of its officers or employees deemed to be "consultants" under the Act by CVRS, as provided for in the Conflict of Interest Code for CVRS, shall promptly file economic disclosure statements for the disclosure categories determined by CVRS, to be relevant to the work to be performed under this Agreement and shall comply with the disclosure and disqualification requirement of the Act, as required by law.

c. Campaign Contribution Disclosure. Contractor has complied with the campaign contribution disclosure provisions of the California Levine Act (Government Code § 84308) and has completed the Levine Act Disclosure Statement attached hereto as Exhibit “H.”

27. Costs and Attorneys’ Fees: If either party commences any legal action against the other party arising out of this Agreement or the performance thereof, the prevailing party in such action may recover its reasonable litigation expenses, including court costs, expert witness fees, discovery expenses, and reasonable attorneys’ fees.

28

28. Governing Law and Choice of Forum: This Agreement shall be administered and interpreted under California law as if written by both parties. Any litigation arising from this Agreement shall be brought in the Superior Court of Sacramento County.

29. Integration: This Agreement represents the entire understanding of CVRS and Contractor as to those matters contained herein and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or agreements, both written and oral. This Agreement may not be modified or altered except in accordance with Section 12.

30. Severability: If any term or provision of this Agreement or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall, to any extent, be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement, or the application of such term or provision to persons or circumstances other than those to which it is invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected thereby, and each term and provision of this Agreement shall be valid and shall be enforced to the fullest extent permitted by law, unless the exclusion of such term or provision, or the application of such term or provision, would result in such a material change so as to cause completion of the obligations contemplated herein to be unreasonable.

31. Headings: The headings of the various sections of this Agreement are intended solely for convenience of reference and are not intended to explain, modify, or place any interpretation upon any of the provisions of this Agreement.

32. Authority: Each person signing this Agreement on behalf of a party hereby certifies, represents, and warrants that he or she has the authority to bind that party to the terms and conditions of this Agreement.

33. Ownership; Permission:

a. Contractor agrees that all work products, including but not limited to, notes, designs, drawings, reports, memoranda, and all other tangible personal property produced in the performance of this Agreement, shall be the sole property of CVRS, provided that Contractor may retain file copies of said work products. Contractor shall provide said work products to CVRS upon request.

b. Contractor represents and warrants that: (i) all materials used or work products produced in the performance of this Agreement, including, without limitation, all computer software materials and all written materials, are either owned by or produced by Contractor or that all required permissions and license agreements have been obtained and paid for by Contractor; and (ii) CVRS is free to use, reuse, publish or otherwise deal with all such materials or work products except as otherwise specifically provided in Exhibit “A.” Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless CVRS and its directors, officers, employees, and agents from any claim, loss, damage, cost, liability, or expense to the extent of any violation or falsity of the foregoing representation and warranty.

34. Counterparts: This Contract may be signed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original and all of which taken together shall constitute one and the

29

same instrument.

35. Warranty and Guarantee: Contractor warrants and guarantees to CVRS that all materials and equipment incorporated into the work will be new unless otherwise specified, and that all work, materials, and equipment will be of good quality, free from faults or defects, and in accordance with the requirements of this Agreement for a period of one (1) year after installation. Any work, materials, or equipment which does not meet such standards shall be deemed “defective work.” The CVRS Project Manager may, in his sole discretion, require Contractor, either prior to or following final payment, to correct or replace such defective work without cost to CVRS. If the Contractor does not correct or replace such defective work within a reasonable time following written notification by the CVRS Project Manager, CVRS shall have the right, but shall not be obligated, to obtain the repair or replacement of the defective work and Contractor shall pay to CVRS on demand all costs and expenses of such. The requirements of this section shall be cumulative with such other rights as provided by this Agreement, by law, and by equity, and shall not be deemed a limitation upon the rights and remedies of CVRS against Contractor.

36. Prevailing Wages: The construction, maintenance and repair work to be performed under this Agreement constitutes a “public work” under Labor Code section 1720. Contractor, and each of Contractor’s subcontractors, shall pay to all laborers, workers and employees performing any construction, maintenance or repair work under this Agreement not less than the applicable general prevailing rate of wages in the locality in which the work is to be done, as determined by the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code section 1770. Copies of the prevailing wage rate schedule are available at the Department of Industrial Relations. Contractor shall cause each subcontractor to insert in each subcontract, if any, a prevailing wage provision implementing the prevailing wage provision herein contained. CVRS may enforce this provision in accordance with the procedures of Labor Code section 1771.6.

30

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE PARTIES HAVE ENTERED INTO THIS AGREEMENT AS OF THE DATE HEREIN ABOVE APPEARING:

CAPITOL VALLEY REGIONAL SAFE (CVRS)

MIKE MCKEEVER

Chief Executive Officer

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Miller & Owen Legal Counsel to CVRS

RECOMMENDED BY:

MATT CARPENTER Director of Transportation Services

CONTRACTOR COMPANY:

Name, Title

31

EXHIBIT “B” LEVINE ACT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

(To be completed by all proposers on SACOG consultant contracts) California Government Code § 84308, commonly referred to as the “Levine Act,” precludes an Officer of a local government agency from participating in the award of a contract if he or she receives any political contributions totaling more than $250 in the 12 months preceding the pendency of the contract award, and for three months following the final decision, from the person or company awarded the contract. This prohibition applies to contributions to the Officer, or received by the Officer on behalf of any other Officer, or on behalf of any candidate for office or on behalf of any committee. The Levine Act also requires disclosure of such contributions by a party to be awarded a specified contract. Please refer to the attachment for the complete statutory language. Current members of the SACOG Board of Directors are: Cecilia Aguiar-Curry Tony Hesch David Sander John Buckland Diane Hodges Don Saylor Christopher Cabaldon Robert Jankovitz Walt Scherer Stanley Cleveland Kevin Johnson Phil Serna Steve Cohn Paul Joiner Jeff Slowey Mark Crews Joe Krovoza Tom Stallard Gary Davis Roberta MacGlashan Brian VeerKamp Jack Duran Steve Miklos Rick West Mary Jane Griego Susan Peters Scott Yuill Carl Hagen Susan Rohan Kevin Hanley Ricky Samayoa 1. Have you or your company, or any agent on behalf of you or your company, made any

political contributions of more than $250 to any SACOG Director(s) in the 12 months preceding the date of the issuance of this request for proposal or request for qualifications? ___ YES ___ NO If yes, please identify the Director(s): _________________________________________

2. Do you or your company, or any agency on behalf of you or your company, anticipate or

plan to make any political contributions of more than $250 to any SACOG Director(s) in the three months following the award of the contract?

___ YES ___ NO If yes, please identify the Director(s): _________________________________________

32

Answering yes to either of the two questions above does not preclude SACOG from awarding a contract to your firm. It does, however, preclude the identified Director(s) from participating in the contract award process for this contract.

DATE (SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED OFFICIAL)

(TYPE OR WRITE APPROPRIATE NAME, TITLE)

(TYPE OR WRITE NAME OF COMPANY)

33

California Government Code Section 84308

(a) The definitions set forth in this subdivision shall govern the interpretation of this section.

(1) "Party" means any person who files an application for, or is the subject of, a proceeding involving a license, permit, or other entitlement for use.

(2) "Participant" means any person who is not a party but who actively supports or opposes a particular decision in a proceeding involving a license, permit, or other entitlement for use and who has a financial interest in the decision, as described in Article 1 (commencing with Section 87100) of Chapter 7. A person actively supports or opposes a particular decision in a proceeding if he or she lobbies in person the officers or employees of the agency, testifies in person before the agency, or otherwise acts to influence officers of the agency.

(3) "Agency" means an agency as defined in Section 82003 except that it does not include the courts or any agency in the judicial branch of government, local governmental agencies whose members are directly elected by the voters, the Legislature, the Board of Equalization, or constitutional officers. However, this section applies to any person who is a member of an exempted agency but is acting as a voting member of another agency.

(4) "Officer" means any elected or appointed officer of an agency, any alternate to an elected or appointed officer of an agency, and any candidate for elective office in an agency.

(5) "License, permit, or other entitlement for use" means all business, professional, trade and land use licenses and permits and all other entitlements for use, including all entitlements for land use, all contracts (other than competitively bid, labor, or personal employment contracts), and all franchises.

(6) "Contribution" includes contributions to candidates and committees in federal, state, or local elections.

(b) No officer of an agency shall accept, solicit, or direct a contribution of more than two hundred fifty dollars ($250) from any party, or his or her agent, or from any participant, or his or her agent, while a proceeding involving a license, permit, or other entitlement for use is pending before the agency and for three months following the date a final decision is rendered in the proceeding if the officer knows or has reason to know that the participant has a financial interest, as that term is used in Article 1 (commencing with Section 87100) of Chapter 7. This prohibition shall apply regardless of whether the officer accepts, solicits, or directs the contribution for himself or herself, or on behalf of any other officer, or on behalf of any candidate for office or on behalf of any committee.

(c) Prior to rendering any decision in a proceeding involving a license, permit or other entitlement for use pending before an agency, each officer of the agency who received a contribution within the preceding 12 months in an amount of more than two hundred fifty dollars ($250) from a party or from any participant shall disclose that fact on the record of the proceeding. No officer of an agency shall make, participate in making, or in any way attempt to use his or her official position to influence the decision in a proceeding involving a license, permit, or other entitlement for use pending before the agency if the officer has willfully or knowingly received a contribution in an amount of more than two hundred fifty dollars ($250) within the preceding 12 months from a party or his or her

34

agent, or from any participant, or his or her agent if the officer knows or has reason to know that the participant has a financial interest in the decision, as that term is described with respect to public officials in Article 1 (commencing with Section 87100) of Chapter 7. If an officer receives a contribution which would otherwise require disqualification under this section, returns the contribution within 30 days from the time he or she knows, or should have known, about the contribution and the proceeding involving a license, permit, or other entitlement for use, he or she shall be permitted to participate in the proceeding.

(d) A party to a proceeding before an agency involving a license, permit, or other entitlement for use shall disclose on the record of the proceeding any contribution in an amount of more than two hundred fifty dollars ($250) made within the preceding 12 months by the party, or his or her agent, to any officer of the agency. No party, or his or her agent, to a proceeding involving a license, permit, or other entitlement for use pending before any agency and no participant, or his or her agent, in the proceeding shall make a contribution of more than two hundred fifty dollars ($250) to any officer of that agency during the proceeding and for three months following the date a final decision is rendered by the agency in the proceeding. When a closed corporation is a party to, or a participant in, a proceeding involving a license, permit, or other entitlement for use pending before an agency, the majority shareholder is subject to the disclosure and prohibition requirements specified in subdivisions (b), (c), and this subdivision.

(e) Nothing in this section shall be construed to imply that any contribution subject to being reported under this title shall not be so reported.

For more information, contact the Fair Political Practices Commission, 428 J Street, Suite 800, Sacramento, CA 95814, (916) 322-5660.

EXHIBIT “C”

PRICE PROPOSAL FOR CVRS CALL BOX MAINTENANCE AND SITE REMOVAL

Task 1: MAINTENANCE COST (FLAT FEE) MONTHLY FEE PER CALL BOX

YEAR 1: $ YEAR 2: $ YEAR 3: $ YEAR 4: $ (OPTION) YEAR 5: $ (OPTION)

35

Task 2: SITE REMOVAL

PER SITE FEE

PERMANENT REMOVAL - PER CALL BOX (CBX) REDUCTION IN FEE

PERMANENT REMOVAL - % CBXS REMOVED REDUCTION IN FEE

$ $ $

$

Submission of signed Price Proposal Form is a firm commitment to perform the work specified in the Scope of Work in accordance with this RFP. Proposer hereby agrees that the terms and prices included in this Proposal will remain open for a period of not less than 120 days after the date of the Proposal Opening. Name of Proposing Firm:

Address:

City, State, Zip Code:

Phone Number/Fax No.:

Email address:

Name & Title of Authorizing Official:

Authorized Signature:

36

EXHIBIT “D”

CURRENT CONTRACT WITH REPUBLIC ITS

37

EXHIBIT “E”

UNIVERSAL PRICE LIST

CAPITAL VALLEY REGIONAL SAFE – PRICE LIST MAJOR COMPONENTS* PRICE 10 WATT SOLAR PANEL & ANTENNA ASSEMBLY $420.00 20 WATT SOLAR PANEL & ANTENNA ASSEMBLY $535.00 SRC ITS CALLBOX UPGRADE KIT $1310.00 TTY HOUSING WITH DOOE ASSEMBLY $425.00 TTY DISPLAY $250.00 CONTROLLER BOARD FOR TTY $375.00 KEYPAD OPTION $91.00 DISPLAY LENS $58.00 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS* PRICE POLE $265.00 AUGER FOUNDATION $230.00 HANDSET AND ARMORED CORD $95.00 DIGITAL TRANSCEIVER GSM/GPRS $415.00 DIGITAL SRC CALLBOX CONTROLLER BOARD $790.00 6V RECHARGEABLE BATTERY $22.00 CALL CONNECTED LIGHT $24.00 (3DB GAIN) DUAL BAND UNITY ANTENNA $56.00 (4 DB) LOW PROFILE ANTENNA $65.00 6DB YAGI ANTENNA $140.00 CORNER REFLECTOR $190.00 SMA/CABLE TO ANTENNA $25.00 CWT CAP ANTENNA ADAPTOR $22.00 ATTENUATOR (10 DB – 30 DB) $48.00 10W SOLAR PANEL $235.00 20W SOLAR PANEL $375.00 SOLAR CABLE TO SOLAR PANEL $26.00 SIGN DIAMOND & ANTI-GRAFFITI $205.00 WIND BRACKETS $18.00 TAPCO HANDRAIL $165.00 *MATERIAL PRICES EXCLUDE INSTALLATION, FREIGHT AND SALES TAX. LABOR, EQUIP. & PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PRICE FOREMAN ELECTRICIAN $91.00/HOUR ELECTRICIAN $85.00/HOUR PRINCIPAL ENGINEER $195.00/HOUR SENIOR ENGINEER $165.00/HOUR ASSOCIATE ENGINEER $150.00/HOUR STAFF ENGINEER $125.00/HOUR SENIOR ENGINEERING ASSISTANT $115.00/HOUR ENGINEERING ASSISTANT $105.00/HOUR CLERICAL $75.00/HOUR CAD OPERATOR $75.00/HOUR PICKUP TRUCK $18.00/HOUR BUCKET TRUCK $25.00/HOUR EXPENSES PAID TO THIRD PARTIES WILL BE BILLED AT ACTUAL COST + 15% ***PRICING IS SUBJECT TO INCREASE ANNUALLY AT THE END OF THE CONTRACT PERIOD BY 3.0% OR THE CHANGE IN THE CPI INDEX, WHICHEVER IS LOWER.

38

EXHIBIT “F”

SYSTEM INSTALLATION/PERMANENT REMOVAL REPORT SPECIFICATIONS

1. CALL BOX/SIGN NUMBER 2. AUTOMATIC NUMBER IDENTIFICATION (AIN) 3. MILE POST MARK 4. DIRECTION INSTALLED ON HIGHWAY 5. SITE TYPE 6. TEXT DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION 7. TEXT DESCRIPTION OF BEST ACCESS 8. MOBILE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (MIN) (CALL BOX PHONE NUMBER) 9. LATITUDE/LINGITUDE AND DIFFERENTIAL CORRECTION METHOD USING

GPS 10. DIGITAL PHOTO

39

EXHIBIT “G”

SYSTEM DATABASE SPECIFICATIONS UPDATE

WHEN SITE CHANGED

UPDATE WHEN SITE INSTALLED

UPDATE W/ PM, CM OR AC VISIT

CALL BOX/SIGN NUMBER √ √ AUTOMATIC NUMBER IDENTIFICATION (ANI) √ √ ELECTRONIC SERIAL NUMBER (ESN) √ √ MILE POST MARK √ √ PEDESTRIAN PAD TYPE √ √ PEDESTRIAN PAD SIZE √ √ SITE TYPE √ √ RETAINING WALL HIEGHT (PROVED RANGE) √ √ HANDRAIL AT SITE? √ √ DIRECTION INSTALLED ON HIGHWAY √ √ TEXT DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION √ √ TEXT DESCRIPTION OF BEST ACCESS √ √ DISPATCH CENTER ASSIGNED TO ANSWER CALLS √ √ LATITUDE/LONGITUDE AND DIFFERENTIAL CORRECTION METHOD USING GPS

√ √

SITE INSTALLATION DATE √ √ IN SERVICE OR OUT OF SERVICE √ REMOVAL DATE √ REINSTALL DATE √ MOBILE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (MIN) (CALL BOX PHONE NUMBER)

√ √

USER TELEPHONE NUMBER (DISPATCH CENTER NUMBER)

√ √

ALARM TELEPHONE NUMBER √ √ MAINTENANCE TELEPHONE NUMBER √ √ INSTALL NOTES-UNUSUAL INSTALLATION NOTES √ √ SPEECH/HEARING IMPAIRED DEVICE INSTALLED? TYPE?

√ √

CALL CONNECTED LIGHT INSTALLED? √ √ CONTROLLER CARD TYPE (E.G., “150”, “SRC”) AND VERSION # WITH DATE OF INSTALLATION

√ √

TRANSCEIVER TYPE/MODEL WITH DATE OF INSTALL √ √ DATES OF ALL PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE (PM) VISITS TO SITE

√ √

DATES AND DESCRIPTIONS OF ALL CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE (CM) OR SCOPE OF WORK ACTIVITIES AT SITE

√ √

WORK ORDER NUMBER FOR ALL CN AND AC ACTIVITIES AT SITE

√ √

DIGITAL SITE PHOTOGRAPHS √ √

40

EXHIBIT “H”

SYSTEM OPERATION AND SITE CONDITION FORM

OPERATIONAL TESTS YES/NO VISUAL INSPECTION YES/NO HANDSET SITS IN CRADLE PROPERLY CALL BOX ORIENTATION CORRECT RINGING IS HEARD OUTER DOOR FUNCTIONS PROPERLY FULLY DUPLEX COMMUNICATIONS IS ESTABLISHED HOUSING PART SECURE AUDIO QUALITY IS GOOD USER INSTRUCTIONS ATTACHED ANI REQUESTED BY CHP AND SENT BY CALL BOX HANDSET RETAINING MECHANISM FUNCTIONS ANI VERIFIED BY CHP HANDSET CABLE ARMORED LOCATION DATA VERIFIED BY CHP ANTI-THEFT LABEL ATTACHED SIGN NUMBER VERIFIED WITH CHP WEEP HOLE CLEAR PHONE NUMBER VERIFIED WITH CHP HANDSET IS HEARING AID COMPATIBLE

FEEDBACK AUDIBLE DURING PROCESS TAMPER-PROOF HARDWARE USED ON SOLAR PANEL

TERMINATE COMMAND RECEIVED BY CALL BOX SOLAR PANEL HARDWARE SECURE

CALL BOX CONNECTION TERMINATED SOLAR PANEL CORRECTLY ORIENTED AND CLEAR

SITE INSPECTION YES/NO VIRTUAL HOLD TESTING YES/NO HANDRAIL INSTALLED PROPERLY VIRTUAL HOLD FUNCTIONS PROPERLY HANDRAIL CONSTRUCTED PROPERLY FULL DUPLEX DROPPED SITE NOT OBSTRUCTED FEEDBACK HEARD IN HANDSET SITE GRADING & PREPARATION IAW PLANS BEEP HEARD IN HANDSET (CHP CALL BACK) SITE RETAINING/FOUNDATION WALL CONSTRUCTION IAW PLANS FULL DUPLEX REESTABLISHED

SHOULDER IS 8FT MINIMUM ANI REQUESTED BY CHP & SENT BY CALL BOX BREAKAWAY BASE ORIENTATION CORRECT SONALERT TESTING YES/NO

OPERATIONS HEIGHT LIMIT SET @ 54” SONALERT AUDIBLE PAD HEIGHT @ ½ “ ABOVE GRADE SONALERT FUNCTIONS IAW SPECS OPPOSITE BOX PAIRING WITHIN LIMITS ADD-ON COMPONENTS YES/NO

HOLES IN PAD FILLED (LARGE PADS ONLY) FEATURE OPERATIONAL

CALL BOX MAINTENANCE RFP/CONTRACT TIMELINE

May 2, 2013 — Transportation Committee May 9, 2013 – CVRS/SACOG Board mail out May 16, 2013 – CVRS/SACOG Board May 17, 2013 – Issue RFP for CVRS Call Box Maintenance May 24, 2013 – Deadline for Written Questions or Requests for Changes to the RFP and/or

Contract May 31, 2013 - Response to Written Questions or Requests for Changes to RFP or contract terms;

RFP Amendment or Addenda, if necessary June 14, 2013 @ 4 PM - Closing date for receipt of proposals June 20, 2013 - Finalists contacted to schedule interviews, if any June 26-27, 2013 - Conduct interviews (if needed); recommend contractor July 25, 2013 – Transportation Committee mail out August 1, 2013 – Transportation Committee August 8, 2013 – CVRS/SACOG Board mail out August 15, 2013 – CVRS/SACOG Board, Contract Award August 23, 2013 – Negotiate and execute contract August 26, 2013 – Start of Project, begin work

If a new CVRS Call Box Maintenance contractor is chosen, they will need approximately 4 months to complete the change to the new contractor’s system, which would likely involve the following:

August - September 2013 – New contractor develops software and database needed to direct and track call box calls to the appropriate locations.

September – December 2013 – New contractor will load new software on all CVRS call boxes, completing approximately 400 per month.

December 31, 2013 – CVRS Call Box Maintenance contractor change over completed.

The potential selection of a new Call Box Maintenance contractor necessitated an extension of the Capitol Valley Regional SAFE Call Box Maintenance Contract from its expiration of June 30, 2012, to December 31, 2013.

Item #13-5-8 Transportat ion Committee Act ion

April 25, 2013 SACOG Toll Credits Use Policy Issue: Should SACOG extend the SACOG Toll Credit Use Policy indefinitely to align with the recently updated Caltrans policy? Recommendation: That the Transportation Committee recommend that the Board (1) extend the SACOG Toll Credit Use Policies 1-5 indefinitely, making amendments as needed; and (2) consider revisiting Policy 6 as part of setting the funding targets for the 2013 Flexible Funding Round. Discussion: In 2010, California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) implemented a two-year Toll Credit Use Policy demonstration program. This demonstration program was a result of Caltrans investing $5.7 billion of toll revenue on highway capital improvement projects. The agency received approval from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) to apply the total investment as toll credits in lieu of state and local matching funds for highway and transit projects that utilize federal money. Today, the non-federal share match requirement for eligible projects can be met in California by applying toll credit, thereby allowing a project to be funded with up to 100 percent federal money for federally-participating costs. To utilize this program, the Board adopted a one-year Toll Credit Use Policy in August 2010, which it extended an additional year at its October 2011 meeting, aligning it with the two year Caltrans policy. Caltrans has since extended its policy indefinitely and will be making modest adjustments in the near future. SACOG’s policy expired October 2012 and needs to be updated to align with the current Caltrans policy, allowing for continued usage of the available flexibility while Caltrans makes adjustments. Amendments to the toll credits policy may be proposed by staff in later months. The use of toll credits is the mechanism by which the federal government waives the requirement for providing local match for federal funds, crediting the state for toll revenue dedicated to transportation. Toll credits are not money. As such, the use of toll credits has its advantages and challenges. An advantage of the use of toll credits is that it permits a sponsor to program a project at 100 percent federal share, preserving its local matching funds for other projects. The application of this to a funding round, with limited federal funds, is where addition discussion is needed, because it could minimize programming flexibility. It is for this reason that Policy #6 of the SACOG Toll Credits Use Policy will be discussed concurrently with setting targets for the 2013 Flexible Funding Round during the summer of 2013. Additionally, Scenario 4 described in the attachment may be further clarified. This scenario involves swapping federal and local funds between projects in order to streamline project delivery and maximize the benefits to project sponsors. The El Dorado County Transportation Commission (EDCTC) and the Placer County Transportation Planning Agency (PCTPA) cooperated with SACOG in drafting the initial policy. Approved by: Mike McKeever Chief Executive Officer MM:MC:RDO:gg Attachment Key Staff: Matt Carpenter, Director of Transportation Services, (916) 340-6276 Theresa Arnold, Manager of Capital Programs, (916) 340-6220 Renee DeVere-Oki, Senior Planner, (916) 340-6219 José Luis Cáceres, Associate Planner (916) 340-6218

cc: Celia McAdam, Placer County Transportation Planning Agency Sharon Scherzinger, El Dorado County Transportation Commission 1300701

SACOG Toll Credit Use Policy

The SACOG Board establishes the following Toll Credit Use Policy:

(1) Allow the use of toll credits on currently programmed projects that can be delivered at full scope without additional federal funds;

(2) Allow the use of toll credits on road rehabilitation projects funded through Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP) shares that were distributed prior to 2009;

(3) Allow the use of toll credits on projects where the sponsor wants to swap federal and local funds between projects;

(4) Allow toll credits to be used to match Federal Transit Administration (FTA) program funds to the maximum extent allowed by FTA policy for any programs that will bring additional funds into the region;

(5) Grant the Chief Executive Officer the authority to approve the use of toll credits in special cases not otherwise allowed by this policy when time is of the essence but in keeping with the spirit of the Toll Credit Use Policy, and to report those actions to the Board at the earliest opportunity.

(6) Postpone the decision on providing 100 percent federal funds on new projects using toll credits as the “match” for FHWA funding programs until later.

Toll Credit Use Scenarios 1. Same Scope, Less Money—Where the cost of a project is less than the federal programmed amount,

toll credits could be substituted for the non-federal match. In other words, a project is delivered wholly with federal funds as programmed, without the need for the original non-federal match because the new non-federal match is now covered by toll credits.

2. Old Formula RSTP Rehabilitation—Where SACOG has distributed federal funds to jurisdictions to implement road rehabilitation projects, these projects could be matched with toll credits, eliminating the local matching funds.

3. Swapping Federal and Local Funds between Phases—Where the early phase of a project was already fully funded with federal funds, with an expectation that the later phases will be over-matched, such later phases could use toll credits if no more federal funds are needed.

4. Swapping Federal and Local Funds between Projects—Where, within a jurisdiction or between jurisdictions, federal funds will be consolidated onto fewer projects and the non-federal matches redirected to other projects in the program.

5. Matching Funds for New Programs not currently used—Where a new or currently unused funding source can be used on a project using toll credits as the match when no local funding source is available. (Examples include: earmark dollars, statewide JARC, and FTA 5311.)

Item #13-5-9 Transportat ion Committee Information

April 25, 2013 Background Briefing on Blueprint and Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy 2035 Issue: At Board Chair Griego's request, staff will provide a briefing for Committee discussion on approximately the past decade of SACOG Board actions and policy making that led to the adoption of the Blueprint and two subsequent Metropolitan Transportation Plans Recommendation: None. This is a discussion item. Discussion: This briefing is intended to focus on the reasons the Board endorsed and has encouraged the implementation of the Blueprint. Next month the Strategic Planning Committee will have a discussion about whether any changes should be made to how SACOG is attempting to implement the Blueprint. Approved by: Mike McKeever Chief Executive Officer MM:gg Key Staff: Matt Carpenter, Director of Transportation Services, (916) 340-6276 1300501

Item #13-5-10 T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i t t e e I n f o r m a t i o n

April 25, 2013 May is Bike Month 2012 Recap and 2013 Campaign Update Issue: What is the status of May Is Bike Month? Recommendation: None; this item is for information only. Discussion: The 2012 May is Bike Month campaign saw a large increase in participants and miles logged. Around the region, 8,900 cyclists participated at mayisbikemonth.com and logged 1.75 million miles—a 26 percent increase in miles from the previous year. Bicyclists represented 130 schools, 400 clubs/teams and 1,300 employers. In addition to the mayisbikemonth.com website, social media use increased with a unique page on the social media network Facebook (facebook.com/mayisbikemonth), which grew from 2,300 “likes” in 2011 to 3,750 in 2012. Promotional strategies from the 2012 campaign included more regular communications, promotion of additional cycling information, and the ability for users to more easily promote the campaign and their involvement via social media and e-mail. New website features and social media uses included:

• Simple, smartphone-friendly version of the website that allowed easier logging of miles. • Safety tips and activity messages were integrated into social media and website messaging for education and

encouragement. • Friend challenges for mileage competitions via e-mail or Facebook. • Participation badges on mayisbikemonth.com for specific activities. • Daily participation of bicycle-friendly businesses on Facebook and Twitter. The business highlighted promoted Bike

Month all month and had a special Bike Month prize for the first cyclist to visit their store. The 2013 campaign will continue to utilize the successful website and social media features from the 2012 campaign. Additional strategies to reach two million miles logged and 15 percent more participants in 2013 include:

• Launching a Bicycle-Friendly Business District in Midtown with participating businesses offering discounts or hosting bike-related events.

• Increasing the ability for participants to sort miles by types of trips, individuals, employers, teams/clubs, and schools to allow users to easily compete with one another on many levels.

• Targeting high traffic pages for additional event and Facebook promotions. • Increasing the number of schools participating through coordination with Safe Routes to School grant schools. • Increasing the volume of unique content posted to the website and shared via social media.

Approved by: Mike McKeever Chief Executive Officer MM:AT:sb Attachment Key Staff: Matt Carpenter, Director of Transportation Services, (916) 340-6276

Rebecca Sloan, Director of External Affairs & Member Services, (916) 340-6224 A.J. Tendick, Public Information Coordinator, (916) 340-6215 Sabrina Bradbury, Public Information Coordinator, (916) 340-6211 1300202

Item #13-5-11 Transportat ion Committee Information

April 25, 2013 Transportation Committee Planning Calendar Update Issue: What items can the Transportation Committee expect to review in calendar year 2013? Recommendation: None; this item is for information only. Discussion: Attached is a draft calendar of standing items which staff anticipates bringing to the Transportation Committee in 2013 and the approximate month of their occurrence. This is a working draft and will be updated as the year goes on to reflect milestone date changes or additional agenda items approved by the Transportation Committee Chair. Approved by: Mike McKeever Chief Executive Officer MM:MC:gg Attachment Key Staff: Matt Carpenter, Director of Transportation Services, (916) 340-6276 1300102

DRAFT Transportation Committee Planning Calendar 2013

Page 1 of 3

1 Local Transportation Fund (LTF) Apportionment Adjustments2 Bicycle/Pedestrian Master Plan Policies 3 Federal Transit Administration (FTA) 5311 Projects4 Unmet Transit Needs Findings5 Connect Card Transit Survey Contract6 Connect Card INIT Contract Amendment7 Proposition 1B Fund Distribution

1 Transportation Development Act (TDA) Unmet Needs Findings2 Public Transportation Modernization, Improvement, and Service Enhancement Account (PTMISEA)

Funding Recommendations

3Modifications to (Sacramento to Emergency Clean Air and Transportation Program (SECAT) Guidelines

4 Subrecipient Agreement for Sacramento Regional Transit (RT) Proposition 1B Pass-through Funding for Server Room Upgrades

1 Transportation Committee: Draft Agenda & Schedule2 Transportation Committee Charge3 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Grant Housing Work Discussion4 Caltrans Grant Applications - Board Authorization5 Galt Community Design Project Scope Changes6 Proposition 1B Transit System Safety, Security, and Disaster Response Bond Account7 Federal Advocacy Update

1 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (MTIP) Amendment & Air Quality Conformity Determination

2Call Box Maintenance RFP Release for Capitol Valley Regional Service Authority for Freeways and Expressways (SAFE)

3 Transportation Funding & Legislation Update 4 Downtown/Riverfront Streetcar: Phase 2 Contract Award5 Programming Recommendations for FTA Section 5310 (Elderly & Disabled Transportation)6 Update on Use of Delegated MTIP Authority7 Adoption of New Sacramento Emergency Clean Air Transportation Program Guidelines

January (to Strategic Planning Committee)

February

March

April


Page 2 of 3

1 Funding of Transit Projects with FTA 5307 & 5339 Apportionments2 Flexible Funds Programming Round Policy Framework & Application Process3 Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Update4 TIGER V Nominations5 SAFE: Draft Budget 6 Call Box Maintenance RFP Release7 Toll Credits Policy8 Blueprint & MTP/SCS Briefing9 May is Bike Month Update

1 MTIP Adoption & Air Quality Conformity Analysis and Public Hearing2 Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (MTP/SCS) Workplan3 Public Participation Plan Annual Amendment4 SAFE: Final Budget5 SACOG Transportation Development Act (TDA) Performance Audit6 TDA Fiscal Audit7 May is Bike Month Outcomes8 Capitol Southeast Connector Project Presentation

1 Project Delivery Plan Update2 Programming Round Funding Targets 3 Presentation on the completed Elk Grove Short Range Transit Plan4 Demand-Response Connectivity Study for Health Care Access 5 SAFE: Call Box Maintenance Contract Award

1 Presentation on the HUD Regional Sustainability Planning Grant 2 Transportation Development Act (TDA) Unmet Needs Process 3 MTP/SCS Implementation Update 4 Transportation Funding & Legislation Update

1 SACOG Salutes!2 Draft Programming Round Recommendations3 Connect Card Implementation Update4 Programming Round Update5 RUCS Transportation Working Group Update6 Transportation Development Act (TDA) Unmet Needs Hearing7 SAFE: Strategic Plan

August

October

June

September

May

July (no committee meeting)


Page 3 of 3

1 Programming Round Recommendations2 Receive and File: Outcomes from Delegated Authority for MTIP Amendments3 Project Delivery Plan Results

1 SACOG Salutes! 2 Draft Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) 3 Programming Round Implementation Update

MTIP AmendmentsCaltrans & Other GrantsPTMISEA FundingSECATConnect Card Contract Amendments

Varies

November

December

transportation committee

Documents