thiru. a. abdul rahman, b.com., llb, judicial magistrate

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.VI, COIMBATORE.

PRESENT : Thiru. A. ABDUL RAHMAN, B.COM., L.L.B.,

Judicial Magistrate No.V,

Judicial Magistrate No.VI(FAC),

Coimbatore.

C.M.P. No. 20091/2021

in

Cr. No. 771/2021

Tuesday, the 28th day of September 2021

Ganesan(55), S/o. Kalimuthu .. Petitioner/Accused

/ VERSUS / Inspector of Police,D1 Ramanathapuram (L & O) P.S.,Cr. No. 771/2021

U/s. 5, 7(3) Lottery Act .. Respondent/Complainant

ORDER

The bail application filed U/s. 437 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner by

Advocate Thiru.R.Manimuthu, B.A., B.L., in C.M.P. No. 20091/2021 received by

this court on 23.09.2021. The respondent/police submitted their reply on

28.09.2021.

After carefully consideration of the bail application and the reply submitted

by the respondent/police this court passed the following order,

The petitioner is the accused in the above crime number. The

Petitioner/accused was arrested and remanded to Judicial custody U/s. 5, 7(3)

Lottery Act on 22.09.2021. For the past 7 days the petitioner is in Judicial

custody. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner totally 32 numbers of

Kerala State Akshaya lottery tickets possessed in his shirt pocket which were

banned by the Government of Tamilnadu and caught by the respondent/Police.

In the bail application it was submitted the accused was arrested for the

alleged offence U/s.5, 7(3) Lottery Act. In the bail application it was further stated

the petitioner has never committed any offence as alleged by the

respondent/police and he is a law abiding citizen and if the petition is allowed he

will produce substantial sureties and he will not abscond. On these grounds the

petitioner asked this court to grant bail.

In the reply the respondent/police has stated the petitioner was arrested

and remanded to judicial custody on 22.09.2021. The respondent/police further

stated that the petition is allowed the petitioner will abscond and tamper the

witness and he will commit the same kind of offence. The respondent/police

further submitted the investigation is still pending and strongly opposed this

petition.

On perusal of the records the petitioner was arrested and remanded to

judicial custody on 22.09.2021 for the alleged offence U/s. 5, 7(3) Lottery Act.

For the past 07 days the petitioner is in judicial custody. The case property was

recovered. Hence, considering the facts and circumstances and considering the

Covid-19 Pandemic situation in the interest of justice this court is inclined to

grant bail to the petitioner with following conditions.

1. The petitioner shall produce two sureties like some each to the value of

Rs.10,000/- to the satisfaction of this court.

2. The petitioner and the sureties are directed to produce their ID proof.

3. The petitioner is directed to co-operate the investigation and shall not

tamper the evidence.

4. The petitioner is directed to sign before the respondent/ police daily at

10.30 AM for the period of 30 days.

The order is typed, corrected and pronounced by me via email on 28th

September 2021.

Sd./A.Abdul Rahman,

Judicial Magistrate No. VI(FAC), Coimbatore.

CC to (sent via email):

1. The Hon'ble Principal District Judge, Coimbatore.

2. The Assistant Public Prosecutor, Judicial Magistrate No.VI Court, Coimbatore.

3. The Inspector of Police, D1 Ramanathapuram (L & O) Police Station, Coimbatore.

4. Counsels for the Petitioner in the respective petitions/ Accused persons.

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE No.VI, COIMBATORE.

PRESENT : Thiru.A. Abdul Rahman, B.Com., L.L.B.,

Judicial Magistrate No. V,

Judicial Magistrate No.VI (FAC),

Coimbatore.

C.M.P.No.20081/2021

in

Cr.No.650/2021

Wednesday the 29th day of September 2021

Deeparani, W/o.Kittusamy,

119/66.67 Rangaiya Street,

Mettupalayam, Coimbatore

Now residing at

R.11-C103, K.G.Garden City,

Nagarajapuram, Vedappatti,

Coimbatore. … Petitioner/ Owner of the Property

// VERSUS //

Inspector of Police,

M-5 Vadavalli Ps.,

Cr. No.650/2021

U/s.454, 457, 380 @ 457, 380 IPC … Respondent

This petition is coming before me on 29.09.2021 as final hearing, the

learned counsel Mr.K.Sakthivel,B.A.,B.L., appeared on behalf of the petitioner

and upon considering the case records this court passed the following

ORDER

The petitioner/Defacto Complainant filed this petition U/s.451 r/w 457

Cr.P.C to pass an order to return the property.

Petition filed one Deeparani, W/o.Kittusamy for return of the property

remanded in P.R.No.94/2021, dated:29.09.2021. The case property is சமமரர 80

ககரமமர எடடயளரள தஙரக கடரட ஒனரற. The petitioner further submitted the petitioner

undertakes to produce the above said property when directed by this Hon'ble

Court at the time of trial.

Reply received. Records perused. The petitioner is the owner of the

property. There is no dispute regarding his ownership. The petitioner is identified

by the respondent/police. The prosecution has no objection to return the

property is சமமரர 80 ககரமமர எடடயளரள தஙரக கடரட ஒனரற. The petitioner also produced

I.D. Proof.

If the property is under the Court custody for long time, it will get damage

and became useless to anybody. Hence, considering the facts and circumstances

and in the interest of justice this court is inclined to return the property with the

following conditions.

1. The petitioner shall produce one surety and execute a bond for

Rs.1,98,250/-

2. The petitioner shall produce a photo copy of the property.

3. The photo copy of the property should be attested by both the petitioner,

Surety and the Investigating Officer.

4. The petitioner is directed to produce the property whenever this court

directs to do so.


September of 2021.

Sd./A.Abdul Rahman,

Judicial Magistrate No.VI (FAC),Coimbatore.



2. The Assistant Public Prosecutor, JM.VI Court, Coimbatore.

3. The Inspector of Police, M-5 Vadavalli Police Station, Coimbatore.



PRESENT : Thiru.A. ABDUL RAHMAN, B.COM., L.L.B.,


Judicial Magistrate No. VI(FAC),

Coimbatore.

C.M.P. No. 19708/2021

in

Cr No. 117/2021

Tuesday the 28th day of September 2021

1) Kutty @ Ajith Kumar(26), S/o. Krishnan

2) Anand(26), S/o. Sangiliyappan

.. Petitioners/Accused 1 & 2

/ VERSUS /Inspector of Police,M5 Vadavalli Police Station,Cr. No. 117/2021U/s. 454, 457, 380 IPC .. Respondent/Complainant

ORDER

The bail application filed U/s.437 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner/Accused 1

& 2 by Advocate Mr.M.Karthik Prabhu, B.A., B.L., in C.M.P. No. 19708/2021 received

by this court. The respondent/police submitted their reply on 22.09.2021

After carefully consideration of the bail applications and reply submitted by the

respondent/police this court passed the following order,

The petitioners who are the accused in the above crime number. The accused 1

& 2 were arrested and remanded to Judicial Custody on 01.09.2021 for the past 28

days. The case of the prosecution is on the date of occurrence when the defacto

complainant went to his native place and returned to home the defacto complainant's

wife saw the house at that time the door and windows were broken and theft the 30

Sovereign Gold Ornaments. Based upon the complaint on investigation the petitioners

and co-accused were arrested and as per the confession given by the petitioner 1 & 2

and co-accused is involved in the offence.

The petitioners are the accused 1 & 2 in the above crime number. The

Petitioner/accused 1 & 2 were arrested and remanded to Judicial custody U/s. 454,

457, 380 IPC on 01.09.2021. In the bail application it was further stated the petitioners

has never committed any offence as alleged by the respondent/police and they were

falsely implicated in this case and they are the only breadwinner of his family and the

petitioners/accused 1 & 2 law abiding citizen. In the bail application it was further

stated the previous bail application filed by the petitioners in CMP.No.19041/2021 was

dismissed by this court on 15.09.2021. This is second bail application. It was further

stated if the petitions are allowed the petitioners will not abscond and pleaded to grant

bail. Both the petitioners asked this court to grant bail and their ready to produce

surety as per the orders passed by this court.

In the reply, the respondent/police further stated, the investigation is not yet

completed. The respondent/police further stated if bail is granted the petitioners will

abscond and tamper the witnesses. In the reply it was further stated the petitioners

already involved various cases in various Police Station. On this grounds

respondent/police strongly object to grant bail.

On perusal of the records the petitioner/accused No.1 & 2 were arrested and

remanded in Judicial custody for the past 28 days. The accused 1 & 2 filed an

application the grant bail him and the same was dismissed already. This is the second

application filed by the petitioner. The learned APP argued that investigation is not yet

completed. But, this case stolen property was recovered. Considering the facts and

circumstances of this case and considering the Covid-19 Pandemic situation and this

court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with following conditions, accordingly

this petition is allowed.

1. The petitioner shall produce two sureties like some each to the value of Rs.10,000/-

to the satisfaction of this court.

2. The petitioner and the sureties are directed to produce their ID proof.

3. The petitioner is directed to co-operate the investigation and shall not tamper the

evidence.

4. The petitioner is directed to sign before the respondent/police daily at 10.30 a.m.

until further orders.

The order is typed, corrected and pronounced by me via email on 28 th September

2021.

Sd./A.Abdul Rahman,

Judicial Magistrate No. VI (FAC),Coimbatore.



2. The Assistant Public Prosecutor, Judicial Magistrate No.VI Court, Coimbatore.

3. The Inspector of Police, M5 Vadavalli Police Station, Coimbatore.


IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE No.VI, COIMBATORE.

PRESENT : Thiru.A. Abdul Rahman, B.Com., L.L.B.,

Judicial Magistrate No. V,

Judicial Magistrate No.VI (FAC),

Coimbatore.

C.M.P.No.19266/2021

in

Cr.No.1542/2020

Wednesday the 29th day of September 2021

K.Palanisamy, S/o.Kumarasamy,

55 BC, Ramalinga Jothi Nagar,

5th Street, Coimbatore South,

Ramanathapuram,

Coimbatore – 641 045 … Petitioner/ Owner of the Property

// VERSUS //

Inspector of Police,

D-1 Ramanathapuram Ps.,

Cr. No.1542/2020

U/s.379 IPC … Respondent

This petition is coming before me on 29.09.2021 as final hearing, the

learned counsel Mr.Sathiyaseelan, appeared on behalf of the petitioner and upon

considering the case records this court passed the following

ORDER

The petitioner/Defacto Complainant filed this petition U/s.451 r/w 457

Cr.P.C to pass an order to return the property.

Petition filed one K.Palanisamy, S/o.Kumarasamy for return of the property

remanded in P.R.No.74/2021, dated:26.08.2021. The case property is சமமரர

15Kg எடடயளரள படழய இரமரப சமமமனரகளர. The petitioner further submitted the

petitioner undertakes to produce the above said property when directed by this

Hon'ble Court at the time of trial.

Reply received. Records perused. The petitioner is the owner of the

property. There is no dispute regarding his ownership. The petitioner is identified

by the respondent/police. The prosecution has no objection to return the

property is சமமரர 15 Kg எடடயளரள படழய இரமரப சமமமனரகளர. The petitioner also

produced I.D. Proof.

If the property is under the Court custody for long time, it will get damage

and became useless to anybody. Hence, considering the facts and circumstances

and in the interest of justice this court is inclined to return the property with the

following conditions.

1. The petitioner shall produce one surety and execute a bond for

Rs.3000/-

2. The petitioner shall produce a photo copy of the property.

3. The photo copy of the property should be attested by both the petitioner,

Surety and the Investigating Officer.

4. The petitioner is directed to produce the property whenever this court

directs to do so.


September of 2021.

Sd./A.Abdul Rahman,

Judicial Magistrate No.VI (FAC),Coimbatore.



2. The Assistant Public Prosecutor, JM.VI Court, Coimbatore.

3. The Inspector of Police, D-1 Ramanathapuram Police Station, Coimbatore.



PRESENT : Thiru.A. ABDUL RAHMAN, B.COM., L.L.B.,


Judicial Magistrate No. VI(FAC),

Coimbatore.

C.M.P. No. 19852/2021 & 19706/2021

in

Cr No. 601/2021

Tuesday the 28th day of September 2021

A1) Karthigeyan(21), S/o. Harikrishnan (CMP No. 19852/2021)

A2) Pradeepmaan(22), S/o. Cheramaan (CMP No. 19706/2021)

.. Petitioners/Accused 1 & 2

/ VERSUS /Inspector of Police,D1 Ramanathapuram (Crime) Police Station,Cr. No. 601/2021U/s. 392 IPC .. Respondent/Complainant

COMMON ORDER

The bail application filed U/s. 437 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner/Accused No.1 by

Advocate Mr.M.Ramesh, B.A., B.L., in C.M.P. No. 19852/2021 and the bail application filed

U/s.437 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner/Accused No.2 by Advocate Mr.K.Manikandan, B.A.,

B.L., in C.M.P. No.19706/2021 received by this court. The respondent/police submitted their

reply on on 22.09.2021

After carefully consideration of the bail applications and reply submitted by the

respondent/police this court passed the following common order,

The petitioners who are the accused in the above crime number. The accused No.1 was

arrested and remanded to Judicial Custody on 31.08.2021. For the past 29 days the

petitioner/Accused No.1 is in judicial custody. The accused No.2 was arrested through P.T.

Warrant and remanded to Judicial Custody on 02.09.2021. For the past 27 days the

petitioner/Accused No.2 is in judicial custody. The case of prosecution on the date of

occurrence both the accused came on a two-wheeler and snatched the cellphone of the defacto

complainant's shirt pocket. Hence, the defacto complainant preferred the complaint against

both the accused.

The petitioner in CMP.No.19852/2021 is the 1st accused in the above crime number. The

Petitioner/accused was arrested and remanded to Judicial custody U/s. 392 IPC on 31.08.2021.

In the bail application it was further stated the petitioner has never committed any offence as

alleged by the respondent/police and he was falsely implicated in this case and he is the only

breadwinner of his family and he is a lawful citizen. The petitioner have not committed any

offence as alleged by the respondent police. The petitioner will not abscond or tamper the

witnesses and the petitioner is having permanent residence. In the bail application it was

further stated the previous bail application filed by the petitioner in CMP.No.17693/2021 was

dismissed by this court on 13.09.2021. This is second bail application. It was further stated if

the petition is allowed he will produce substantial sureties and he will not abscond. On this

grounds the petitioner asked this court to grant bail.

The petitioner in CMP.No.19706/2021 is the 2nd accused in the above crime number. The

Petitioner/accused was arrested and remanded to Judicial custody for the offence U/s. 392 IPC

on 02.09.2021. The petitioner's father is bedridden due to arthritis. The petitioner have not

committed any offence as alleged by the respondent police. In the bail application it was further

stated the previous bail application filed by the petitioner in CMP.No.18209/2021 was dismissed

by this court on 13.09.2021. This is second bail application. It was further stated if the petition

is allowed he will produce substantial sureties and he will not abscond. On this grounds the

petitioner asked this court to grant bail.

In the reply, the respondent/police further stated, the investigation is not yet completed.

The respondent/police further stated if bail is granted the petitioners will abscond and tamper

the witnesses. On this grounds respondent/police strongly object to grant bail. The learned APP

submitted the investigation is still pending, one more case is pending against the accused and

strongly opposed both the bail application.

On perusal of the records the petitioner/accused No.1 is in Judicial custody for the past

28 days and the petitioner/accused No.2 is in Judicial custody for the past 27 days. The

accused 1 & 2 filed an application the grant bail him and the same was dismissed already. This

is the second application filed by the petitioners. The learned APP argued that investigation is

not yet completed. But, this case stolen property was recovered. Considering the facts and

circumstances of this case and considering the Covid-19 Pandemic situation and this court is

inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with following conditions, accordingly this petition is

allowed.

1. The petitioners shall produce two sureties like some each to the value of Rs.10,000/-

to the satisfaction of this court.

2. The petitioners and the sureties are directed to produce their ID proof.

3. The petitioners are directed to co-operate the investigation and shall not tamper the

evidence.

4. The petitioners are directed to sign before the respondent/police daily at 10.30 a.m.


The order is typed, corrected and pronounced by me via email on 28th September 2021.

Sd./A.Abdul Rahman,

Judicial Magistrate No. VI (FAC),Coimbatore.

CC to (sent via email):1. The Hon'ble Principal District Judge, Coimbatore.2. The Assistant Public Prosecutor, Judicial Magistrate No.VI Court, Coimbatore.3. The Inspector of Police, D1 Ramanathapuram (Crime) Police Station, Coimbatore.4. Counsels for the Petitioner in the respective petitions/ Accused persons.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE,

COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L.,

PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Wednesday, this the 29 th day of September, 2021

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.3985/2021

(In C.A.161/2021)

C.A.No.161/2021 C.C.1850/2020

(The Judicial Magistrate Court No.7, Coimbatore.)

Offences: u/s.380 of IPC.

(SI for a period of two years.)

Thangaraj (Age 23 years)

S/o.Palanisamy … Petitioner / Appellant

/vs/

1. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore.

2. The Inspector of Police,

C-3, Saibaba Colony Police Station,

(Crime No.1166/2017). … Respondents / Complainant

This petition is filed by the petitioner / appellant, u/s.389(1) of Cr.P.C.,

praying to suspend the sentence till the disposal of appeal.

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the

presence of Tvl. I.Padmanathan, K.Sakthivel and S.Kokila, Advocates for the

petitioner / Appellant, and Thiru M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented

for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and upon hearing both

side arguments, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioner seeks suspension of sentence pending disposal of appeal.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that the

petitioner has been convicted and sentenced to undergo SI for a period of two

years, for the offence u/s.380 IPC, imposed by the learned Judicial Magistrate

No.7, Coimbatore, in C.C.No.1850/2020, dated 12-02-2021. The learned counsel

further submitted that from 29-01-2021, the petitioner is in judicial custody and

prayed to suspend the sentence till the disposal of the appeal.

3. The learned Public Prosecutor has no objection to allow this petition.

4. After considering all the above said aspects, since the petitioner is in

judicial custody from 29-01-2021, and also having regard to the facts and

circumstances of the case and also considering the nature of offence and this Court

is inclined to allow this petition and the substantive sentence of imprisonment

imposed on the petitioner by the lower Court alone is hereby suspended till

disposal of the appeal subject to the following conditions:-

(i) The petitioner is ordered to be enlarged on bail on his executing a bond for

Rs.10,000/- with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the Judicial

Magistrate No.7, Coimbatore, within 15 d ays from the date of this order.

(ii) The petitioner shall report before the trial Court on the 1st working day of

every English calendar month at 10.30 a.m. without fail, until further orders.

The appeal is made over to the IV Additional District & Sessions Court,

Coimbatore. The appeal stands posted to 02-11-2021.

On the failure of the petitioner, to comply with any of the above said

conditions, the suspension granted to him shall stand cancelled automatically and

the Magistrate concerned shall take necessary steps to secure the petitioner /

accused.

This order is dictated to steno-typist, typed by her, corrected and pronounced

by me via email on this 29th day of September, 2021.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL.,

PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE,

COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The IV Additional District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore.

2. The Judicial Magistrate Court No.7, Coimbatore.


4. The Petitioner /appellant through his counsel.


COIMBATORE.




CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No. 3952/2021

Balamurali (Age 20 years)

S/o.Thangavel … Petitioner / Accused No.1

/vs/

State, Rep. by

through the Inspector of Police,

E1 Singanallur Police Station,

Crime No.728/2021

Offence: u/s.294(b), 323 and 506(ii) of IPC.

Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant

(The Judicial Magistrate No.3, Coimbatore)

This petition filed on behalf of the petitioner to release him on anticipatory

bail u/s.438 of Cr.P.C.


presence of Tvl. R.P.Ramesh, S.Vinoth Kumar and R.Murugesan, Advocates

for the petitioner / Accused No.1 and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor,

represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and upon

hearing both side arguments, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.728/2021 of E-1 Singanallur

Police Station, since he is apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent

police, for the alleged offences u/s.294(b), 323 and 506(ii) of IPC, he has filed this

petition, seeking grant of anticipatory bail.

The learned counsel for the petitioner is present.

The learned Public Prosecutor has submitted that reply has not been

received.

At request of the learned Public Prosecutor, this petition is adjourned

to 04-10-2021.

Call on 04-10-2021. Till such time, the respondent police is directed

not to arrest the petitioner.



Sd/-R.SAKTHIVEL,


COIMBATORE.


1. The Judicial Magistrate Court, Mettupalayam.


3. The Inspector of Police, Karamadai Police Station, Coimbatore.

4. Counsel for the petitioner / Accused.


COIMBATORE.





A.Mohan Kumar (Age 22 years)

S/o.Ayyamuthusamy … Petitioner / Accused

/vs/

State, Rep. by


All Women Perur Police Station,

Crime No.5/2021

Offence: u/s.417, 506(i) of IPC and Sec.4 of Women Harassment Act.


(The Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court, Coimbatore.)

The petition filed on behalf of the petitioner to release him on anticipatory



presence of Tvl. K.S.Pasupathy and Sathyamoorthy, Advocates for the

petitioner / Accused and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented



ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.5/2021 of All Women Perur Police

Station, since he is apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police, for

the alleged offences u/s.417, 506(i) of IPC and Sec.4 of Women Harassment Act,

he has filed this petition, seeking grant of anticipatory bail.


Defacto complainant is present. It is stated that matter has been settled

between the petitioner and the defacto complainant.

The learned Public Prosecutor requested to adjourn this petition to some

other day.


to 04-10-2021.

Call on 04-10-2021.



Sd/-R.SAKTHIVEL,


COIMBATORE.


1. The Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court, Coimbatore.


3. The Inspector of Police, All Women Perur Police Station, Coimbatore.

4. Counsel for the Petitioner / Accused.


COIMBATORE.





Muniyandi (A-2)

S/o.Samayan … Petitioner / Accused

/vs/

State, Rep. by


Sulur Police Station,

Crime No.678/2021

Offence: u/s.302 of IPC.


(The Judicial Magistrate Court, Sulur.)

The petition filed on behalf of the petitioner to release him on bail u/s.439 of

Cr.P.C.


presence of Tvl. K.Raja, A.Subramanian and M.Madhumitha, Advocates for

the petitioner / Accused and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor,



ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.678/2021 of Sulur Police Station,

for the alleged offence u/s.302 of IPC, he has filed this petition, seeking grant of

bail.



other day.


to 01-10-2021.

Call on 01-10-2021.



Sd/-R.SAKTHIVEL,


COIMBATORE.


1. The Judicial Magistrate Court, Sulur.


3. The Inspector of Police, Sulur Police Station, Coimbatore.



COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru. R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L.,




V.Lalson Vavachan (Age 29 years)

S/o.K.M.Vavachan … Petitioner / Third Party

/vs/

State, Rep. by


K.G.Chavadi Police Station,

Crime No.28/2021

Offence: u/s.379 of IPC and Sec.21(1) of Mines and Minerals

(Development and Regulation) Act 1957.


(The Judicial Magistrate Court, Madukkarai.)

This petition is filed u/s.451 and 457 of Cr.P.C., seeking to pass an

order to return of RC Book.


presence of Tvl. S.Elango and V.Hemalatha, Advocates for the petitioner /

owner of the property, and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented



ORDER

Heard on both side.

This petition is filed by the petitioner, u/s.451 and 457 of Cr.P.C, seeking to

pass an order to return the original R.C. Book pertaining to the vehicle bearing

Reg. No.KL 63 H 0398.


petitioner is the owner of the vehicle bearing Reg.No. KL 63 H 0398. . The said

vehicle was seized in connection with the present case. Thereafter, the petitioner

filed a petition praying to return the said vehicle as interim custody. While passing

order in the said petition, this Court directed the petitioner to produce original RC

book before the Judicial Magistrate, Madukkarai. As per the order passed by this

Court, the petitioner produced original RC book before the lower Court. Now the

said RC book is required to the petitioner for the purpose of paying Road Tax

which will expire on 30-09-2021. Hence, the petitioner prayed to return the

original RC book as interim custody.

3. The learned Public Prosecutor requested to allow this petition on some

condition.

4. Considering the reason stated in the petition, this Court is inclined to

allow this petition on deposit of amount payable by the petitioner.

5. Accordingly, this petition is allowed on condition that the

petitioner shall make a refundable deposit of Rs.20,000/- to the credit of

the same in Crime No.28/2021 of K.G.Chavadi Police Station before the

Judicial Magistrate, Madukkarai. The petition mentioned RC Book

pertaining to the vehicle bearing Reg.No. KL 63 H 0398 is ordered to be

returned to the petitioner as interim custody for a period of 30 days for the

petition mentioned purpose. Further the petitioner is directed to surrender

the original RC Book to the Judicial Magistrate, Madukkarai, after

completion of the petition mentioned purpose. Thereafter, the petitioner

shall get back the amount of deposit from the Court concerned. Further the

factum of interim custody of RC Book given by this Court to the petitioner

is to be intimated to the RTO Concerned.



Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL.,


COIMBATORE.


1. The Judicial Magistrate Court, Madukkarai.


3. The Government Pleader, Coimbatore.

4. The Regional Transport Officer, Coimbatore.

5. The Inspector of Police, K.G.Chavadi Police Station, Coimbatore District.

6. Counsel for the Petitioner / Third Party.


COIMBATORE.





Antony (Age 39 years)

S/o.Ramasamy … Petitioner / Accused No.5

/vs/

State, Rep. by


E-1, Singanallur Police Station,

Crime No.597/2021

Offence: u/s.148, 294(b), 324, 506(ii), 307 and 302 of IPC.




Cr.P.C.


presence of Tvl. M.Omar Sheriff and A.Aneesha Parvin, Advocates for the

petitioner / Accused No.5 and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor,



ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.597/2021 of E-1, Singanallur

Police Station, for the alleged offence u/s.148, 294(b), 324, 506(ii), 307 and 302 of

IPC, he has filed this petition, seeking grant of bail.



other day.


to 01-10-2021.

Call on 01-10-2021.



Sd/-R.SAKTHIVEL,


COIMBATORE.




3. The Inspector of Police, E-1, Singanallur Police Station, Coimbatore.



COIMBATORE.





Basheer Ahamed (Age 58 years)

S/o.Mohamad Ali … Petitioner / Accused

/vs/

State,

Rep. by the Inspector of Police

E-2, Peelamedu (L & O) Police Station,

Crime No.421/2021

Offence: u/s.354(A) of IPC and Sec.4 of TNPWH Act.



The petitioner seeks time extension of time to comply the order passed by

this Court in C.M.P.No.2281/2021, dated 14-06-2021.


presence of Thiru. K.Velmurugan, Advocate for the petitioner / Accused and

Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing

the petition submitted via e-mail and upon hearing both side arguments, this Court

pronounced the following:-

ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioner seeks time extension of time to comply the order passed by

this Court in C.M.P.No.2281/2021, dated 14-06-2021.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this Court has

granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner on 14-06-2021 in C.M.P.No.2281/2021.

Thereafter, the petitioner was absconded. After made reasonable efforts, the

petitioner was brought again by the family members and friends. Hence, the

petitioner is unable to produce sureties before the Court concerned within the

stipulated time. Hence, he prays to extend time to comply the order passed by this

Court.

3. The learned Public Prosecutor has no objection to allow this petition.

4. Heard on both side. It is stated that out of fear, the petitioner was

absconded. Further stated that the defacto complainant abducted the petitioner, his

wife and obtained signature in blank papers and obtained cheques.

5. Considering the nature of this petition, this Court is of the considered

view that there is no need to go into the merits of the averments made in the

petition. Moreover, in view of the Covid-19, consequent announcement of

lockdown, this Court is inclined to allow this petition and thereby time is

extended till 13-10-2021 to the petitioner to comply the order passed

by this Court.



Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL.,


COIMBATORE.




3. The Inspector of Police, E-2, Peelamedu Police Station, Coimbatore District.



COIMBATORE.





Vandarkuzhali @ Thenmozhi @ Kavitha @ Thena

W/o.Prabhakran … Petitioner / Accused No.2

/vs/

State,


CBCID Perur Police Station,

Crime No.26/2002

Offence: u/s.120(B) r/w 420 r/w 109 of IPC.


(The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Coimbatore.)

The petitioner seeks relaxation of the condition imposed on her in

C.M.P.No.634/2020, dated 28-02-2020.


presence of Tvl. P.Thirugnanasambantham and V.Hemalatha, Advocates for

the petitioner / Accused No.2 and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor,



ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioner seeks relaxation of the condition which is already imposed on

her by this Court in C.M.P.No.634/2020, dated 28-02-2020.


The learned Public Prosecutor requested to adjourn this petition to

tomorrow.

At request of the Public Prosecutor, this petition is adjourned to

30-09-2021.

Call on 30-09-2021.



Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL.,


COIMBATORE.


1. The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Coimbatore.


3. The Inspector of Police, CBCID Perur Police Station, Coimbatore District.



COIMBATORE.





1. P.Arunachalam (Age 49 years)

S/o.Palanisamy

2. Ravi @ Ravishanmugam (Age 44 years)

S/o.Rangasamy

3. R.Mohan @ Mohankumar (Age 51 years)

S/o.Rengasamy … Petitioners / Accused

/vs/

State,


Kuniamuthur Police Station,

Crime No.522/2021

Offence: u/s.147, 448, 294(b) and 506(i) of IPC.



The petitioners seek relaxation of the condition imposed on them in

C.M.P.No.3191/2021, dated 25-08-2021.


presence of Tvl. Ma.Balamurugan, I.Soundar and V.Devi, Advocates for the




ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioners seek relaxation of the condition which is already imposed on

them by this Court in C.M.P.No.3191/2021, dated 25-08-2021.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioners appeared before this Court and

submitted that anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioners, by this Court, on

25-08-2021, in C.M.P.No.3191/2021 with a condition to sign before the respondent

police daily at 10.00 a.m., until further orders. As per the order passed by this

Court, the petitioners have been complying with the condition from 07-09-2021

without any violation. Now, the petitioners prayed to relax the condition totally.

3. The learned Public Prosecutor has no objection to relax the condition

totally.

4. Considering the above said aspects, having regard to the period of

compliance, nature of offence and also considering the other circumstances of the

case, this Court is inclined to relax the condition totally which is already

imposed on the petitioners. Further the petitioners are directed to appear before

the Court concerned on all the hearing dates without fail.



Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL.,


COIMBATORE.




3. The Inspector of Police, Kuniamuthur Police Station, Coimbatore District.

4. Counsel for the Petitioners / Accused persons.


COIMBATORE.





Ashok Kumar @ Balasubramaniam (Age 44 years)

S/o.Sundaram … Petitioner / Accused

/vs/

State,


PEW Coimbatore City Police Station,

Crime No.667/2021

Offence: u/s.4(1-A) and 4 (1)(a) of TNP Act.



The petitioner seeks relaxation of the condition imposed on him in

C.M.P.No.3463/2021, dated 03-09-2021.


presence of Tvl. R.Kannadasan, M.Ramesh and S.Ahamed Asarudeen,

Advocates for the petitioner / Accused and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public

Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail

and upon hearing both side arguments, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

Heard on both side.


him by this Court in C.M.P.No.3463/2021, dated 03-09-2021.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner appeared before this Court and

submitted that bail was granted to the petitioner, by this Court, on 03-09-2021, in

C.M.P.No.3463/2021 with a condition to sign before the respondent police daily at

10.00 a.m., until further orders. As per the order passed by this Court, the

petitioner has been complying with the condition from 05-09-2021 without any

violation. Now, the petitioner prays to relax the condition totally.


totally.




imposed on the petitioner. Further the petitioner is directed to appear before the

Court concerned on all the hearing dates without fail.



Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL.,


COIMBATORE.




3. The Inspector of Police, PEW, CBE, City Police Station, Coimbatore District.



COIMBATORE.





K.Vinothkumar (Age 22 years)

S/o.Kittan … Petitioner / Accused

/vs/

State, Rep. by



Crime No.917/2021


(Development and Regulation) Act.




Cr.P.C.


presence of Tvl. K.S.Pasupathy and G.Sathyamoorthy, Advocates for the




ORDER

Heard on both side.


for the alleged offence u/s.379 of IPC and Sec.21(1) of Mines and Minerals

(Development and Regulation) Act, he has filed this petition, seeking grant of bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner is found to have

transported gravel in a tipper lorry without any valid permission.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is no

way connected with the offence. The petitioner is the sole bread winner of his

family. The petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he never

indulged any activities as alleged and he is in judicial custody from 22-09-2021

and prayed to release the petitioner on bail.

4. The learned Public Prosecutor submitted that occurrence happened on

22-09-2021 and the same has been reported to the respondent police on the same

day. There are two accused in this case. The petitioner is arrayed as A-2. On the

date of occurrence, the accused had taken soil from Government Poramboke kuttai,

by using tipper lorry. The respondent police intercepted the said vehicle at

Pallapalayam to Kannampalayam Road and found that the said vehicle was loaded

with gravel. On enquiry, it came to know that the accused used the said soil for

commercial purpose. Investigation is going on. No previous case is reported

against the petitioner.

5. This Court has considered the submissions made by either side. The

petitioner has been remanded to judicial custody for the offences u/s. 379 of IPC

and Sec.21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act. The

petitioner is in judicial custody from 22-09-2021. According to the petitioner, he

has been falsely implicated in this case and he never indulged any activities as

alleged. The learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the accused had taken the

soil from Government Kuttai. Investigation is going on. No previous case is

reported against the petitioner.

6. Taking all the above said aspects into consideration, considering the

nature of offence, period of incarceration, being the first offender, and also

considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to

grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions:-



Magistrate, Sulur.

(ii) The petitioner is directed to sign before the respondent police, daily

at 10.00 a.m. until further orders.

(iii) The petitioner or his men shall not tamper the evidence.

(iv) The petitioner shall not abscond and he shall co-operate with the

investigation agency as and when required.

(v) Violation of any of the condition imposed by this Court will result in

cancellation of the bail.

(vi) In case of the condition No.(i) to (iv) are violated, it is open to the

investigating officer to file appropriate application before the learned Judicial

Magistrate for cancellation of bail granted hereby, as held by the Hon’ble Supreme

Court in P.K.Shaji /vs/ State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560].



Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL.,


COIMBATORE.



2. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Coimbatore.


4. The Inspector of Police, Sulur Police Station, Coimbatore District.



COIMBATORE.





Vandarkuzhali @ Thenmozhi @ Kavitha @ Thena

W/o.Prabhakran … Petitioner / Accused No.2

/vs/

State,


Pothanur Police Station,

Crime No.38/2002

Offence: u/s.120(B) r/w 420 r/w 109 of IPC.



The petitioner seeks relaxation of the condition imposed on her in

C.M.P.No.633/2020, dated 28-02-2020.


presence of Tvl. P.Thirugnanasambantham and V.Hemalatha, Advocates for

the petitioner / Accused No.2 and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor,



ORDER

Heard on both side.


her by this Court in C.M.P.No.633/2020, dated 28-02-2020.


The learned Public Prosecutor requested to adjourn this petition to

tomorrow.

At request of the Public Prosecutor, this petition is adjourned to 30-

09-2021.

Call on 30-09-2021.



Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL.,


COIMBATORE.




3. The Inspector of Police, Pothanur Police Station, Coimbatore District.



COIMBATORE.





Vineeth @ Vineethkumar (Age 22 years)

S/o.Selvam … Petitioner / Accused No.4

/vs/

State,


Singanallur Police Station,

Crime No.271/2021

Offence: u/s.392 @ 395 r/w 397 of IPC.




C.M.P.No.3526/2021, dated 06-09-2021.


presence of Tvl. A.Paul Pandian and J.Jasmine Reeta Mary, Advocates for the

petitioner / Accused No.4 and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor,



ORDER

Heard on both side.





C.M.P.No.3562/2021 with a condition to sign before the respondent police daily at

10.00 a.m., until further orders. As per the order passed by this Court, the

petitioner has been complying with the condition for the past 15 days without any

violation. Now, the petitioner prays to relax the condition totally.


totally.








Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL.,


COIMBATORE.




3. The Inspector of Police, Singanallur Police Station, Coimbatore District.



COIMBATORE.





Ezhilarasan (Age 27 years)

S/o.Nagarajan … Petitioner / Accused

/vs/

State, Rep. by



Crime No.916/2021


(Development and Regulation) Act.




Cr.P.C.


presence of Tvl. K.S.Pasupathy and G.Sathyamoorthy, Advocates for the




ORDER

Heard on both side.


for the alleged offence u/s.379 of IPC and Sec.21(1) of Mines and Minerals

(Development and Regulation) Act, he has filed this petition, seeking grant of bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner is found to have

transported gravel in a tipper lorry without any valid permission.


way connected with the offence. The petitioner is the sole bread winner of his

family. The petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he never

indulged any activities as alleged and he is in judicial custody from 22-09-2021

and prayed to release the petitioner on bail.



day. There are two accused in this case. The petitioner is arrayed as A-2. On the

date of occurrence, the accused had taken soil from Government Poramboke kuttai,

by using tipper lorry. The respondent police intercepted the said vehicle at

Chettipalayam to Palladam Road and found that the said vehicle was loaded with

gravel. On enquiry, it came to know that the accused used the said soil for

commercial purpose. Investigation is going on. No previous case is reported



petitioner has been remanded to judicial custody for the offences u/s. 379 of IPC

and Sec.21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act. The

petitioner is in judicial custody from 22-09-2021. According to the petitioner, he

has been falsely implicated in this case and he never indulged any activities as

alleged. The learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the accused had taken the

soil from Government Kuttai. Investigation is going on. No previous case is

reported against the petitioner.

6. Taking all the above said aspects into consideration, considering the

nature of offence, period of incarceration, being the first offender, and also

considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to

grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions:-



Magistrate, Sulur.














Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL.,


COIMBATORE.





4. The Inspector of Police, Sulur Police Station, Coimbatore District.



COIMBATORE.





Saravanakumar (Age 19 years)

S/o.Thangaraj … Petitioner / Accused No.1

/vs/

State, Rep. by


Pollachi CSCID Police Station,

Crime No.245/2021

Offence: u/s.6(4) of TNSC (RDCS) Order 1982 r/w 7(1)(a)(ii) of EC Act,

1955.




Cr.P.C.


presence of Thiru. S.Rajendran, Advocate for the petitioner / Accused and




ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.245/2021 of Pollachi CSCID

Police Station, for the alleged offence u/s.6(4) of TNSC (RDCS) Order 1982 r/w

7(1)(a)(ii) of EC Act 1955, he has filed this petition, seeking grant of bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner and yet another accused

found to have transported 2205 kgs of PDS rice unauthorisedly.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is

cleaner. The petitioner is an innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this

case and he is in judicial custody from 18-09-2021 and prayed to release the

petitioner on bail.



day. On the date of occurrence, the respondent police was engaged in vehicle

checking at Pollachi to Palladam Road. At that time, one Mahindra Boldero pick

up vehicle was coming from South to North. The respondent police intercepted the

said vehicle and stopped the vehicle. At that time, the driver of the vehicle fled

away from that place. The person who accompanied the driver was arrested by the

respondent police. Thereafter, the respondent police seized the rice. Investigation

is not yet completed. No previous case is reported against the petitioner.


petitioner has been remanded to judicial custody for illegal transportation of 2205

kgs of PDS rice. The petitioner is in judicial custody from 18-09-2021. It is stated

that the petitioner is the cleaner of the vehicle. The learned Public Prosecutor

submitted that investigation is not yet completed. No previous case is reported


6. After considering all the above said aspects, considering the nature of

offence, quantum of PDS rice involved, considering the period of incarceration,

being the first offender, and also considering the facts and circumstances of the

case, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the

following conditions:-



Magistrate No.4, Coimbatore.














Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL.,


COIMBATORE.





4. The Inspector of Police, Pollachi CSCID Police Station, Coimbatore District.



COIMBATORE.





Abdul Jalil (Age 33 years)

S/o.Noor Mohammed … Petitioner / Accused

/vs/

State, Rep. by


C-2, Race Course Police Station,

Crime No.486/2021

Offence: u/s.392 IPC @ Sec.392, 397, 341, 323 and 506(ii) of IPC.




Cr.P.C.


presence of Thiru. S.Rajendran, Advocate for the petitioner / Accused and




ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.486/2021 of C-2, Race Course

Police Station, for the alleged offence u/s.392 IPC @ Sec.392, 397, 341, 323 and

506(ii) of IPC, he has filed this petition, seeking grant of bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 28-07-2021, at about 12.15 hours,

the petitioner and other accused threatened the defacto complainant and snatched a

sum of Rs.1,600/- and a cell phone from the defacto complainant and his realtive.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there is some

previous enmity between the petitioner and the defacto complainant. Due to

which, the present complaint has been foisted against the petitioner. The petitioner

is an innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case and the petitioner is

in judicial custody from 20-09-2021 and prayed to release the petitioner.



day. The defacto complainant is working as Manager in HDFC Life, R.S.Puram

Branch. On 28-07-2021, at about 12.15 hours, the defacto complainant and his

relative were travelling in a two wheeler. When they are nearing Railway Station,

Lanka Corner, two persons came in a two wheeler behind the defacto complainant

and they intercepted the defacto complainant’s vehicle and snatched a sum of

Rs.1,600/- and a cell phone from the defacto complainant and his relative. Except

the present case, two cases in B-4 Police Station in Crime No.181/2021 and

359/2021 are pending against the petitioner. Another case is pending against the

petitioner in Crime No.269/2021 of Kuniyamuthur Police Station. The said case

has been registered for the offence u/s.302 IPC. In this case, investigation is not

yet completed. In the said circumstances, if the petitioner is released on bail, he

will threaten the witness and accordingly, the learned Public Prosecutor prayed for

dismissal of the petition.


petitioner has been remanded to judicial custody for the offences u/s.392 IPC @

Sec.392, 397, 341, 323 and 506(ii) of IPC. The petitioner is in judicial custody

from 20-09-2021. According to the petitioner, there is some previous enmity

between the petitioner and the defacto complainant. Due to which, the present

complaint has been foisted against the petitioner. Per contra, the learned Public

Prosecutor submitted that on the date of occurrence, the accused persons

threatened the defacto complainant and his relative and snatched cash and cell

phone. Except the present case, three cases are pending against the petitioner. In

which, one case has been registered for the offence u/s.302 IPC. Investigation is

going on.


offence, date of arrest, stage of investigation, antecedents of the petitioner, this

Court is of the considered view that if the apprehension raised by the prosecution

that the petitioner is released on bail, he will threaten the defacto complainant and

the witnesses is reasonable and acceptable one. Hence, this Court is not inclined to

grant bail to the petitioner.

Hence, this petition is dismissed.



Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL.,


COIMBATORE.




3. The Inspector of Police, C-2, Race Course Police Station, Coimbatore.



COIMBATORE.





1. Sanjai (Age 19 years)

S/o.Ravichandran

2. Ravichandran (Age 54 years)

S/o.Kandasamy

3. Amuthavalli (Age 48 years)

W/o.Ravichandran

4. Sivakumar (Age 57 years)

S/o.Kandasamy … Petitioners / Accused

/vs/

State, Rep. by


Karamadai Police Station,

Crime No.728/2021

Offence: u/s.294(b), 323 and 506(i) of IPC.


(The Judicial Magistrate Court, Mettupalayam.)

This petition filed on behalf of the petitioners to release them on anticipatory



presence of Thiru. P.Rajendran, Advocate for the petitioners and Thiru.

M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the

petition submitted via e-mail and upon hearing both side arguments, this Court


ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioners are the accused in Crime No.728/2021 of Karamadai Police

Station, since they are apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police,

for the alleged offences u/s.294(b), 323 and 506(i) of IPC, they have filed this


2. No representation for the petitioners. In the petition submitted on

behalf of the petitioners, it is stated that on the date of occurrence, the 1st petitioner

was grazing cows in his land. At that time, the defacto complainant came there and

picked up quarrel with the 1st petitioner not to graze the cows. The petitioners are

innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case and they are no way

connected with the offence and prayed for grant of anticipatory bail to the

petitioners.

3. The learned Public Prosecutor submitted that on the date of occurrence

there was some wordy quarrel between the petitioners and the defacto complainant.

As a result of which, the present case as well as counter case has been registered

against either party. Investigation is going on.


alleged occurrence happened due to the wordy quarrel between the parties. Except

Sec.506(i) IPC, the other petition mentioned offences are bailable in nature.

Investigation is going on. Considering the nature of offence and facts and

circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to

the petitioners subject to the following conditions:-

(i) Anticipatory bail is granted to the petitioners.

(ii) The petitioners shall execute a bond for Rs.10,000/- each in the event

of their arrest or the petitioners shall surrender before the Judicial Magis -

trate, Mettupalayam, and execute a bond of Rs.10,000/- each within 15

days from the date of this order.

(iii) The petitioners shall produce two sureties likesum each to the value

of Rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, Met -

tupalayam, within 15 days from the date of this order.

(iv) The petitioners are directed to sign before the respondent police daily

at 10.00 a.m., until further orders.

(vi) The petitioners or their men shall not tamper the evidence.

(vii) The petitioners shall not abscond and they shall co-operate with the investi-

gation agency as and when required.

(viii) In case of the condition No.(ii) to (vii) are violated, it is open to the investi-

gating officer to file appropriate application before the learned Judicial Magistrate

for cancellation of bail granted hereby, as held by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in

P.K.Shaji /vs/ State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560].



Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL.,


COIMBATORE.




3. The Inspector of Police, Karamadai Police Station, Coimbatore.



COIMBATORE.





Kutty @ Rajesh (Age 24 years)

S/o.Antony Chelladurai … Petitioner / Accused No.2

/vs/

State, Rep. by


Pollachi East Police Station,

Crime No.449/2021

Offence: u/s.294(b), 323, 324 and Sec.4 of TNPHW Act 2002.


(The Judicial Magistrate Court No.1, Pollachi.)




presence of Tvl. A.Girija and A.Rajkumar, Advocates for the petitioner /

Accused No.2 and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for

State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and upon hearing both side

arguments, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.449/2021 of Pollachi East Police


the alleged offences u/s. 294(b), 323, 324 and Sec.4 of TNPHW Act 2002, he has

filed this petition, seeking grant of anticipatory bail.


The learned Public Prosecutor is present.

The learned counsel for the petitioner requested to adjourn this petition to

08-10-2021.

At request of the petitioner’s counsel, this petition is adjourned to

08-10-2021.

Call on 08-10-2021



Sd/-R.SAKTHIVEL,


COIMBATORE.


1. The Judicial Magistrate Court No.1, Pollachi.


3. The Inspector of Police, Pollachi East Police Station, Coimbatore District.



COIMBATORE.





1. Parthiban (Age 32 years) (A-1)

C/o.Karunanithi

2. Karunanithi (Age 28 years) (A-2)

S/o.Muthusamy

3. Nirmala (Age 51 years) (A-3)

W/o.Karunanithi … Petitioners / Accused Nos.1, 2 and 3

/vs/

State, Rep. by


Vadavalli Police Station,

Crime No.659/2021

Offence: u/s.294(b), 323, 506(i) and 420 of IPC.



The petition filed on behalf of the petitioners to release them on anticipatory



presence of Tvl. Chris Ajay Bastine and S.Raja, Advocates for the petitioners /

Accused Nos.1, 2 and 3 and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor,



ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioners are the accused in Crime No.659/2021 of Vadavalli Police


for the alleged offences u/s.294(b), 323, 506(i) and 420 of IPC, they have filed this


The learned counsel for the petitioners is present.

The learned Public Prosecutor has submitted that reply has not been

received.


to 01-10-2021.

Call on 01-10-2021.



Sd/-R.SAKTHIVEL,


COIMBATORE.




3. The Inspector of Police, Vadavalli Police Station, Coimbatore.



COIMBATORE.





Murugesan (Age 38 years)

S/o.Selvaraj … Petitioner / Accused

/vs/

State, Rep. by


Ukkadam Police Station,

Crime No.163/2021

Offence: u/s.143, 341, 294(b) and 506(i) of IPC.






presence of Tvl. M.Kalaiselvan, M.Saravanakumar, A.Josan, D.Maha Vishnu

and Poornima, Advocates for the petitioner / Accused and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj,

Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via

e-mail and upon hearing both side arguments, this Court pronounced the

following:-

ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.163/2021 of Ukkadam Police


the alleged offences u/s.143, 341, 294(b) and 506(i) of IPC, he has filed this



way connected with the offence. The petitioner is an innocent and he has been

falsely implicated in this case and prayed for grant of anticipatory bail.



day. The defacto complainant is the Sub-Inspector of Police. On the date of

occurrence, the defacto complainant and other police officials were engaged in

patrol duty at Town Hall, Big Bazaar Street area. At that time, at about 1 O’clock,

huge crowd of Hindu Munnani people came in two wheelers and raised slogans.

At that time, some other people who were standing in front of one foot wear raised

some slogans. Due to which, large crowd gathered in the said place and traffic was

affected. Hence, the defacto complainant registered the case.

4. Considering the submissions made by either side, having regard to the

nature of offence and also considering the date of occurrence, and other facts and

circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to

the petitioner subject to the following conditions:-

(i) Anticipatory bail is granted to the petitioner.

(ii) The petitioner shall execute a bond for Rs.10,000/- in the event of his

arrest or the petitioner shall surrender before the Judicial Magistrate No.5,

Coimbatore, and execute a bond of Rs.10,000/- within 15 days from the

date of this order.

(iii) The petitioner shall produce two sureties likesum each to the value of

Rs.10,000/- to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate No.5, Coimbatore,

within 15 days from the date of this order.

(iv) The petitioner is directed to sign before the respondent police daily at

10.00 a.m., until further orders.

(v) The petitioner or his men shall not tamper the evidence.

(vi) The petitioner shall not abscond and he shall co-operate with the investiga-

tion agency as and when required.







Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL.,


COIMBATORE.




3. The Inspector of Police, Ukkadam Police Station, Coimbatore.



COIMBATORE.





R.Mahadevan (Age 50 years)

S/o.Raman … Petitioner / Accused

/vs/

State,


Pollachi Taluk Police Station,

Crime No.413/2021

Offence: u/s.3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(va) of SC/ST (POA) Act 1989, Amended

Act 2015 r/w Sec.294(b) and 506(ii) of IPC..

Through the Spcial Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant

(The Pricipal District and Sessions Court, Coimbatore.)


C.M.P.No.2979/2021, dated 06-08-2021.


presence of Thiru. V.Chithrakavitha, Advocate for the petitioner / Accused and

Thiru. S.Marimuthu, Special Public Prosecutor , represented for State, upon

perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and upon hearing both side arguments,

this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

Heard on both side.





C.M.P.No.2979/2021 with a condition to sign before the respondent police daily

twice, until further orders. As per the order passed by this Court, the petitioner has

been complying with the condition from 07-08-2021 without any violation. Now,

the petitioner prays to relax the condition totally.

3. The learned Special Public Prosecutor has no objection to relax the

condition totally.








Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL.,


COIMBATORE.


1. The Principal District and Sessions Court, Coimbatore.

2. The Special Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore.

3. The Inspector of Police, Pollachi Taluk Police Station, Coimbatore.



COIMBATORE.





P.Venkatesan (Age 28 years)

S/o.Pattusamy … Petitioner / Accused No.2

/vs/

State, Rep. by


R.S.Puram Police Station,

Crime No.459/2021

Offence: u/s.294(b), 323, 324 and 506(i) of IPC.






presence of Tvl. A.Mahaboob Basha, A.Ameera Hikma Aatika and K.Bala

Murugan, Advocates for the petitioner / Accused No.2 and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj,



following:-

ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.459/2021 of R.S.Puram Police


the alleged offences u/s.294(b), 323, 324 and 506(i) of IPC, he has filed this


2. The case of the prosecution is that the accused persons picked up quarrel

with the defacto complainant and abused the defacto complainant by using filthy

language and assaulted and threatened the defacto complainant with dire

consequences.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that all are friends. In

this case, already A-1 was released on bail by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1,

Coimbatore. The petitioner is an innocent and he has been falsely implicated in

this case and prayed for anticipatory bail to the petitioner.



day. There arose some wordy quarrel between the accused and the defacto

complainant. In that process, the accused abused the defacto complainant by using

filthy language and assaulted and threatened the defacto complainant with dire

consequences. After the occurrence, the defacto complainant has been admitted in

the hospital on 18-09-2021 and discharged on the same day. Investigation is going

on.


respondent police registered the case for the alleged offences u/s.294(b), 323, 324

and 506(i) of IPC. The petitioner and the defacto complainant are known persons.

The alleged occurrence happened due to the wordy quarrel between the parties. In

this case, the defacto complainant has been admitted in the hospital on 18-09-2021

and discharged on the same day. Investigation is going on.


offence, since victim has been discharged from the hospital, and also considering

the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant

anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions:-





date of this order.















Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL.,


COIMBATORE.




3. The Inspector of Police, R.S.Puram Police Station, Coimbatore.



COIMBATORE.





Ganapoongothai (Age 31 years)

D/o.Kaliyappan … Petitioner / Third Party

/vs/

State, Rep. by


Aliyar Police Station,

Crime No.174/2021


(Development and Regulation Act)1957.


(The Judicial Magistrate Court No.2, Pollachi.)

This petition is filed u/s.457 r/w 451 of Cr.P.C., seeking to pass an

order to return of Ashok Leyland Vehicle bearing the Registration No.TN

40 F 2810.


presence of Tvl. S.S.Thirumoorthy and K.Muthuvijayan, Advocates for the

petitioner / Third Party, and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor,



ORDER

Heard on both side.

This petition is filed u/s.457 r/w 451 of Cr.P.C, seeking to pass an order

to return of property i.e., Ashok Leyland Vehicle bearing the Registration No. TN

40 F 2810, as interim custody to the petitioner.


petitioner is the owner of the vehicle i.e., Ashok Leyland Vehicle bearing the

Registration No. TN 40 F 2810. The said vehicle has been seized by the

respondent police in Crime No.174/2021. The petitioner used the said vehicle to

supply building materials to the public. The said vehicle is essential for the

petitioner for his day to day life. As of now, the vehicle is kept idle without any

use. The value of the vehicle will get depreciate. In the said circumstances, the

petitioner prays to return the vehicle to the petitioner as interim custody.

3. The learned Public Prosecutor has filed counter, wherein it is stated that

the vehicle has been seized by the authorities concerned stating that the said

vehicle was used to transport gravel sand without any valid permission. On the

same day, information was sent to the Revenue Authority to take necessary action.

As of now, the vehicle was produced before the Judicial Magistrate No.2, Polalchi,

and PR No has been assigned as PR No.185/2021.


petitioner is the owner of the petition mentioned vehicle. The vehicle was seized

by stating that it was used in transporting gravel illegally. The respondent police

registered the case in Crime No.174/2021. As of now, the vehicle was produced

before the Judicial Magistrate No.2, Pollachi and PR number assigned as PR

No.185/2021.

5. After considering all the above said aspects, this Court is inclined to allow

this petition and thereby the petition mentioned vehicle is ordered to be returned to

the petitioner as interim custody subject to the following conditions:-

(i) Petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty thousand

only) to the credit of the same in Crime No.174/2021, of Aliyar Police Station,

before the Judicial Magistrate No.2, Pollachi.

(ii) Petitioner shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees

Ten Thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of

the Judicial Magistrate No.2, Pollachi.

(iii) Petitioner shall give an affidavit before the Judicial Magistrate No.2,

Pollachi, stating that she will not use the vehicle in question for any illegal

activities in future and shall produce the said vehicle as and when required by the

Court.

(iv) Petitioner shall not alter the nature and character of the vehicle. Further the

petitioner shall not encumber or alienate the said vehicle without prior permission

of the Court.

(v) Petitioner shall surrender the original RC Book before the Court concerned.

(vi) Petitioner is also directed to take photographs of the vehicle in all the angles

at her own cost.

(vii) RC Book and photographs of the vehicles should be kept with case records.



Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL.,


COIMBATORE.


1. The Judicial Magistrate Court No.2, Pollachi.



4. The Inspector of Police, Aliyar Police Station, Coimbatore District.

5. Counsel for the Petitioner / Third Party.


COIMBATORE.





1. Ranjith (Age 27 years)

S/o.Jesuraj

2. Prabhu (Age 28 years)

S/o.Arbutharaj … Petitioners / Accused Nos.1 and 2

/vs/

State,


Rathinapuri Police Station,

Crime No.906/2021

Offence: u/s.4(1-A) of Tamilnadu Prohibition Act.



The petition filed on behalf of the petitioners to release them on bail u/s.439

of Cr.P.C.


presence of Thiru. A.Sivakumar, Advocate for the petitioners / Accused Nos.1

and 2 and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon



ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioners are the accused in Crime No.906/2021 of Rathinapuri Police

Station, for the alleged offence u/s.4(1-A) of Tamilnadu Prohibition Act, they have

filed this petition, seeking grant of bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners are in possession of 15

numbers of brandy bottles.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are

daily wages coolie workers. They are no way connected with the offence. They

are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case and they are in

judicial custody from 19-09-2021 and prayed to release the petitioners on bail.



day. There are two accused in this case. The accused are in possession of 15

numbers of brandy bottles. On enquiry, it came to know that they involved in

selling the said liquor bottles for higher price. In this case, investigation is still

pending. The petitioners belong to other District. No previous case is reported

against the petitioners.


petitioners have been remanded to judicial custody for illegal possession of 15

numbers of brandy bottles. After arrest, the respondent police seized the liquor

bottles. In this case, investigation is still pending. The petitioners belong to other

District. No previous case is reported against the petitioners.


offence, period of incarceration, since properties have been recovered and bring the

first offender, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners subject to

the following conditions:-

(i) The petitioners are ordered to be enlarged on bail on their executing a bond

for Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the

Judicial Magistrate No.2, Coimbatore.

(ii) The petitioners are directed to sign before the respondent police,

daily at 10.00 a.m. until further orders.

(iii) The petitioners or their men shall not tamper the evidence.

(iv) The petitioners shall not abscond and they shall co-operate with the










Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL.,


COIMBATORE.





4. The Inspector of Police, Rathinapuri Police Station, Coimbatore.



COIMBATORE.





Vikash Suriya (Age 21 years)

S/o.Thangavel … Petitioner / Accused

/vs/

State, Rep. by


District Crime Branch Police Station,

Crime No.Not Known







presence of Tvl. R.Arunachallam and S.Naveenkumar, Advocates for the




ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail, for the alleged offence u/s.420 of IPC.



other day.


to 04-10-2021.


not to arrest the petitioner.



Sd/-R.SAKTHIVEL,


COIMBATORE.




3. The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch Police Station, Coimbatore.



COIMBATORE.





1. Joseph Nejedly (Aged 75 years)

S/o.Joseph Nejedly

2. E.Antony Baskar (Aged 54 years)

S/o.Edward … Petitioners / Accused Nos.1 and 2

/vs/

State, Rep. by


C-2, Race Course Police Station,

Crime No.608/2021

Offence: u/s.465, 468, 471 and 120(B) of IPC.






presence of Thiru. K.R.Sankaran, Advocate for the petitioners / Accused Nos. 1

and 2, and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon



ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioners are the accused in Crime No.608/2021 of C-2, Race Course

Police Station, since they are apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent

police, for the alleged offences u/s.465, 468, 471 and 120(B) of IPC, they have

filed this petition, seeking grant of anticipatory bail.



other day.


to 01-10-2021.


not to arrest the petitioners.



Sd/-R.SAKTHIVEL,


COIMBATORE.




3. The Inspector of Police, C-2, Race Course Police Station, Coimbatore.



COIMBATORE.





Prathap (Age 47 years)

S/o.Ramachandran … Petitioner / Accused

/vs/

State, Rep. by


Peelamedu Police Station,

Crime No. Not Known

Offence: u/s.457 and 380 of IPC.






presence of Tvl. M.Saravanakumar, K.Lakshminarayanan, C.Divya and S.P.

Sowndharya, Advocates for the petitioner / Accused and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj,



following:-

ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail, for the alleged offences u/s.457 and

380 of IPC.



other day.


to 01-10-2021.

Call on 01-10-2021.



Sd/-R.SAKTHIVEL,


COIMBATORE.




3. The Inspector of Police, Peelamedu Police Station, Coimbatore.



COIMBATORE.





Vikram singh (Age 24 years)

S/o.Jawahar Singh … Petitioner / Accused No.1

/vs/

State, Rep. by


B-3, Variety Hall Road Police Station,

Crime No.414/2021

Offence: u/s.6(a), 6(b), 24(1) and 20(2) of COTPA Act and Sec.77 of JJ Act






presence of Tvl. M.V.Vijayaragavan, J.Shrihari and S.Jaisuriya, Advocates

for the petitioner / Accused No.1 and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor,



ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.414/2021 of B-3, Variety Hall

Road Police Station, since he is apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent

police, for the alleged offences u/s.6(a), 6(b), 24(1) and 20(2) of COTPA Act and

Sec.77 of JJ Act, he has filed this petition, seeking grant of anticipatory bail.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is

arrayed as A-1. In this case, A-2 and A-3 are arrested and remanded and

subsequently they are released on bail by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.5,

Coimbatore. The petitioner is no way connected with the offence. The petitioner

is the owner of the shop. The petitioner is not present in the occurrence place at

the time of occurrence. The petitioner is an innocent and he has been falsely

implicated in this case and prayed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.



day. There are three accused in this case. A-1 is the owner of the shop. The

respondent police was engaged in patrol duty at Idayar Stree, near Meera Stores.

At that time, one minor boy came and he had given a substance like a powder and

on suspicion the respondent police enquired the said minor boy. On enquiry, the

respondent police came to know that the accused persons stored banned tobacco

products in a particular godown. The respondent police seized banned tobacco

products in the three gunny bags. Investigation is going on.

4. Considering the submissions made by either side, having regard to the

nature of offence, quantum of banned articles involved, and also considering the

facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory

bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions:-





date of this order.















Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL.,


COIMBATORE.




3. The Inspector of Police, B-3, Variety Hall Road Police Station, Coimbatore.



COIMBATORE.





1. A.Vigneshkumar (Age 29 years)

S/o.Arumugam

2. M.Gunamani (Age 58 years)

W/o.Arumugam

3. P.Arumugam (Age 67 years)

S/o.Ponnan … Petitioners / Accused

/vs/

State, Rep. by


All Women Puliyakulam Police Station,

Crime No.Not Known.

Offence: u/s.Not Known.


(The Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court, Coimbatore.)




presence of Tvl. K.Purushothaman and G.Senthilkumar, Advocates for the

petitioners / Accused and Tvl. M/s.R.M.Somasundaram, R.Radharaman and

S.Easwaramoorthi, Advocates for the defacto complainant / intervener

[C.M.P.No.3930/2021] and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented



ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioners seek anticipatory bail.

The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that petitioners are ready to

co-operate with the investigation agency.

The learned counsel for the intervener submitted that the petitioners are not

co-operating with the respondent police.

The learned Public Prosecutor submitted that CSR enquiry is pending.

Heard on both sides. The defacto complainant is none other than the wife of

1st petitioner Vignesh Kumar. The 2nd and 3rd petitioners are the parents of the 1st

petitioner. The learned Public Prosecutor submitted that CSR enquiry is pending.

The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that respondent police called the

petitioners repeatedly over phone. Hence, the petitioners are apprehending arrest

at the hands of the respondent police.

Intervener counsel submitted that petitioners have not attended the enquiry.

Further, submitted that at the instance of the petitioners, the defacto complainant

resigned her job.

In view of the facts and circumstances, this Court does incline to

order not to arrest and adjourn this petition to 05-10-2021. In the

meantime, the petitioners are directed to co-operate with the respondent

police for enquiry.





Sd/-R.SAKTHIVEL,


COIMBATORE.


1. The Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court, Coimbatore.


3. The Inspector of Police, All Women Puliyakulam Police Station, Coimbatore.


5. Counsel for the defacto complainant.


COIMBATORE.





1. Santhosh (Age 28 years)

S/o.Vijayakumar

2. Vasanthakumar (Age 24 years)

S/o.Vijayakumar … Petitioners / Accused

/vs/

State, Rep. by


D-1, Ramanathapuram Police Station,

Crime No.746/2021

Offence: u/s.294(b), 324 and 506(ii) of IPC






presence of Thiru. K.Rajasekar, Advocate for the petitioners / Accused and




ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioners are the accused in Crime No.746/2021 of D-1,

Ramanathapuram Police Station, since they are apprehending arrest at the hands of

the respondent police, for the alleged offences u/s.294(b), 324 and 506(ii) of IPC,

they have filed this petition, seeking grant of anticipatory bail.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioners and the

defacto complaint are neighbors and close relatives. Due to domestic dispute the

alleged offences occurred. Further submitted that the defacto complainant

admitted in the hospital and discharged from the hospital on the same day.

The learned Public Prosecutor submitted that reply has not been received.

In view of the facts and circumstances as stated by the petitioners’

counsel, this Court does incline to order not to arrest.


to 07-10-2021. Further the petitioners are directed to appear before the

respondent police whenever the respondent police call for enquiry.





Sd/-R.SAKTHIVEL,


COIMBATORE.




3. The Inspector of Police, D-1, Ramanathapuram Police Station, Coimbatore.



COIMBATORE.





Abuthahir (Age 36 years)

S/o.Matharsha … Petitioner / Accused

/vs/

State, Rep. by


D-4, Kuniyamuthur Police Station,

Crime No.567/2021.

Offence: u/s.51 and 63(a) Copy Right Act.






presence of Tvl. I.Mohamed Mustafa and N.Dinesh Kumar, Advocates for the




ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.567/2021 of D-4, Kuniyamuthur


police, for the alleged offences u/s.51 and 63(a) Copy Right Act, he has filed this




other day.


to tomorrow.

Call on 30-09-2021.



Sd/-R.SAKTHIVEL,


COIMBATORE.




3. The Inspector of Police, D-4, Kuniyamuthur Police Station, Coimbatore.



COIMBATORE.





1. S.Ravichandran (Age 57 years)

S/o.Subbiah

2. R.Shanthi (Age 52 years)

W/o.S.Ravi chandran

3. Praveen Kumar (Age 36 years)

S/o.S.Ravi Chandran

4. Sathyabhama (Age 26 years)

W/o.Praveen Kumar

5. R.Vellingiri (Age 47 years)

S/o.K.Ramasamy

6. Poonusamy (Age 55 years)

S/o.Ramasamy … Petitioners / Accused

/vs/

State,


Annur Police Station,

Crime No.869/2021

Offence: u/s.147, 294(b), 323, 506(i) of IPC and Sec.4 TNPWH Act 2002.


(The Judicial Magistrate Court, Mettupalayam.)




presence of Thiru. Louis.K.Thomas, Advocate for the petitioners / Accused and

Tmt/Selvi.J.Vanitha Rosy, Advocate for the Defacto complainant / Intervener

Intervener [C.M.P.3889/2021] and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor,



ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioners are the accused in Crime No.869/2021 of Annur Police

Station, Since they are apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police,

for the alleged offence u/s.147, 294(b), 323, 506(i) of IPC and Sec.4 TNPWH Act

2002, they have filed this petition, seeking grant of anticipatory bail.

The learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the Intervener

are present.


Mediation is going on.

In view of the facts and circumstances, this petition is adjourned to

07-10-2021.

Mediation Report by 07-10-2021. Till such time, the respondent

police is directed not to arrest the petitioners.



Sd/-R.SAKTHIVEL,


COIMBATORE.




3. The Inspector of Police, Annur Police Station, Coimbatore District.


5. Counsel for the defacto complainant.

6. Mediation Center, Coimbatore.


COIMBATORE.





Avin (Age 19 years)

S/o. Jeeva Kumar … Petitioner / Accused

/vs/

State,



Crime No.764/2021

Offence: u/s.147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324 and 307 of IPC.



This petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioner to release him on bail

u/s.439 of Cr.P.C.


presence of Thiru. S.Rajendran, Advocate for the petitioner and Thiru.


petitions submitted via e-mail and upon hearing both side arguments, this Court


ORDER

Heard on both sides.

The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.764/2021 of Rathinapuri Police


for the alleged offences u/s.147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324 and 307 of IPC, he has filed

this petition, seeking grant of anticipatory bail.

The learned counsel for the petitioner filed a memo stating that he

does not press the petition.

Memo filed by the petitioner is recorded.

In view of the memo filed by the petitioner’s counsel, this petition is

dismissed as not pressed.



Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL.,


COIMBATORE.







COIMBATORE.





Thangavel (Age 54 years)

S/o.Karuppasamy Gounder … Petitioner / Accused

/vs/

State, Rep. by



Crime No.Not Known.



(The Judicial Magistrate Court No.6 , Coimbatore.)




presence of Thiru. R.Arunachallam, Advocate for the petitioner / Accused and

Tvl. S.Saravana Kumar and P.Vignehs Babu, Advocate for the defacto

complainant [C.M.P.No.3957/2021] and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public

Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail

and upon hearing both side arguments, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail, for the alleged offence u/s.420 of IPC.


The learned Public Prosecutor submitted that reply has not been received.


to 04-10-2021.

Call on 04-10-2021. The Investigation Officer attached with District

Crime Branch Police Station / respondent police is directed to appear

before this Court and state about the nature of the compliant.



Sd/-R.SAKTHIVEL,


COIMBATORE.







COIMBATORE.




CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION Nos.3738/2021 and 3854/2021

1. Arjun (Age 20 years)

S/o.Mohan

2. Sivaraman (Age 19 years)

S/o.Pateeshwaran … Petitioners in C.M.P.3738/2021 / A-6 and A-7

Aveen (Age 23 years)

S/o.Jeevakumar … Petitioner in C.M.P.3854/2021/ A-2

/vs/

State,



Crime No.764/2021

Offence: u/s.147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324 and 307 of IPC.



These two petitions were filed on behalf of the petitioners in the respective

petitions to release them on bail u/s.439 of Cr.P.C.

These two petitions are coming on this day for final hearing before this

Court in the presence of Tvl. M.Elangovan, K.Suryakumar and G.Alex Sekar ,

Advocates for the petitioners in C.M.P.No.3738/2021 and Thiru. S.Raja,

Advocate for the petitioner in C.M.P.No.3854/2021 and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj,

Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petitions submitted

via e-mail and upon hearing both side arguments, this Court pronounced the

following:-

COMMON ORDER


The petitioners in the respective petitions are the accused in Crime

No.764/2021 of Rathinapuri Police Station, for the alleged offences u/s.147, 148,

294(b), 323, 324 and 307 of IPC, they have filed these three petitions separately,

seeking grant of bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 29-08-2021, the petitioners in the

respective petitions and other accused unlawfully assembled in the occurrence

place and picked up quarrel with the defacto complainant and abused the defacto

complainant by using filthy language and assaulted the defacto complainant and

another person and caused injuries to them. Hence, the present complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners in C.M.P.3738/2021 submitted that

the petitioners are arrayed as A-6 and A-7. Initially, the defacto complainant was

admitted in a private hospital and thereafter the defacto complainant has been

admitted in CMC Hospital and thereafter, the case has been registered. In this

case, victim has been discharged from the hospital on 31-08-2021. The petitioners

are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case and they are in

judicial custody from 06-09-2021 and prayed to release the petitioners on bail.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner in C.M.P.3854/2021 has submitted

that the petitioner is mentally abnormal and he is taking medicines for the past two

years. The petitioner is in need of medical assistance. The petitioner is an

innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case and he is in judicial

custody from 29-08-2021 and prayed to release the petitioner on bail.

5. Opposing to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners in the respective

petitions, the learned Public Prosecutor submitted that occurrence happened on

29-08-2021 and the same has been reported to the respondent police. There are

eight accused in this case. Already seven accused were arrested and remanded.

On receipt of intimation from the Government Hospital, the respondent police

went to the hospital and recorded the statement of the victim. On 29-08-2021, at

about 8.00 p.m., the defacto complainant and three others went to a biriyani hotel.

At that time, three accused persons were standing there. At that time, there arose

some wordy quarrel between the accused persons and the defacto complainant. In

that process, the defacto complainant’s relative namely Sadam Hussain assaulted

one of the accused. Thereafter, at about 8.20 p.m., the defacto complainant and

others were standing in Kannappan Nagar area. At that time, the petitioners in the

respective petitions along with other accused unlawfully assembled in the said

place and picked up quarrel with the defacto complainant and others and assaulted

the defacto complainant by using iron rod and knife. In that process, the defacto

complainant’s relative also sustained injury. After the occurrence, the victim was

admitted in Coimbatore Medical College Hospital on 30-08-2021 and discharged

from the hospital on 31-08-2021. Thereafter the victim was admitted in private

hospital. In this case, investigation is not yet completed. No previous case is

reported against the petitioners in the respective petitions. Against A-1, two

previous cases are pending against him. Against A-4, two previous cases are

pending against him.


petitioners in the respective petitions have been remanded to judicial custody from

u/s.147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324 and 307 of IPC. The petitioners in

C.M.P.3738/2021 are in judicial custody from 06-09-2021. The petitioner in

C.M.P.3854/2021 is in judicial custody from 29-08-2021. According to the

petitioners in the respective petitions, they have been falsely implicated in this case

and they are no way connected with the offence. The learned Public Prosecutor

submitted that on the date of occurrence, the petitioners in the respective petitions

along with other accused unlawfully assembled in the occurrence place and picked

up quarrel with the defacto complainant and others and assaulted the defacto

complainant by using iron rod and knife. In that process, the defacto complainant’s

relative also sustained injury. Victim was admitted in CMC hospital on 30-08-

2021 and discharged from the said hospital on 31-08-2021. Investigation is going

on. No previous case is reported against the petitioners in the respective petitions.


offence, having regard to the period of incarceration, considering the alleged overt

act in the FIR, being the first offenders, and also considering the facts and

circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners

in the respective petitions subject to the following conditions:-

(i) The petitioners in the respective petitions are ordered to be enlarged on bail

on their executing a bond for Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties for a like sum

each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate No.2, Coimbatore.

(ii) The petitioners in the respective petitions are directed to sign before

the respondent police, daily at 10.00 a.m. until further orders.

(iii) The petitioners in the respective petitions or their men shall not tamper the

evidence.

(iv) The petitioners in the respective petitions shall not abscond and they shall

co-operate with the investigation agency as and when required.







This common order is dictated to steno-typist, typed by her, corrected and

pronounced by me via email on this 29th day of September, 2021.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL.,


COIMBATORE.






5. Counsels for the Petitioners in the respective petitions / Accused persons.


COIMBATORE.





Sudhakar (Age 35 years)

S/o.Ramasamy … Petitioner / Owner of the

property

/vs/

State, Rep. by


Thadagam Police Station,

Crime No.262/2021

Offence: u/s.379 of IPC and 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (D&R) Act 1957.



This petition is filed u/s.451 and 457 of Cr.P.C., seeking to pass an

order to return of TATA SE 1613 bearing the Registration No. TN 30 B

5789.


presence of Tvl. G.Dhasaratharaman, M.Govindaraj and K.Karthika,

Advocates for the petitioner / owner of the property, and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj,



following:-

ORDER

This petition is filed u/s. 451 and 457 of Cr.P.C, seeking to pass an order

to return of property i.e., TATA SE 1613 bearing the Registration No. TN 30 B

5789, as interim custody to the petitioner.


The learned Public Prosecutor requested time for filing counter.

At request of learned Public Prosecutor, this petition is

adjourned to 01-10-2021.

Call on 01-10-2021, for filing counter of Public Prosecutor.



Sd/-R.SAKTHIVEL,


COIMBATORE.





4. The Inspector of Police, Thadagam Police Station, Coimbatore District.

5. Counsel for the Petitioner / Owner of the property.


COIMBATORE.




CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.3662/2021 and 3706/2021

1. Ajmalkhan (Age 29 years) (A-2)

S/o.Alihaji

2. Rajesh (Age 30 years) (A-3)

S/o.Ramakrishnan

3. Shajan (Age 29 years) (A-6)

S/o.Jayakumar

… Petitioners in C.M.P.No.3662/2021/ Accused Nos.2, 3 and 6

R.Sabari (Age 30 years)

S/o.Ravikumar

… Petitioner in C.M.P.No.3706/2021 / Accused No.1

/vs/

State, Rep. by


Madukkarai Police Station,

Crime No.380/2021




These two petitions were filed on behalf of the petitioner in the respective

petitions to release them on bail u/s.439 of Cr.P.C.

These two petitions are coming on this day for final hearing before this

Court in the presence of Tmt. / Selvi. V.Shanthi, Advocate for the petitioners in

C.M.P.No.3662/2021, and Tvl. R.Kannathasan, M.Ramesh and

R.Rajeshkumar, Advocate for the petitioner in C.M.P.No.3706/2021 and Thiru.


petitions submitted via e-mail and upon hearing both side arguments, this Court


COMMON ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioners in the respective petitions are the accused in Crime

No.380/2021 of Madukkarai Police Station, for the alleged offence u/s.395 and 397

of IPC, they have filed these two petitions separately, seeking grant of bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant was assaulted

and threatened by the accused persons on the guise of purchase of two vans for his

business purpose.

3. The learned counsels for the petitioners in the respective petitions have

submitted that in this case, the respondent police recovered the car. The petitioners

in the respective petitions are innocent and they are no way connected with the

offence and they have been falsely implicated in this case and they never

committed any offence as alleged and the petitioners in C.M.P.3662/2021 are in

judicial custody from 07-07-2021 and the petitioner in C.M.P.3706/2021 is in

judicial custody from 12-07-2021. The learned counsels further submitted that the

earlier bail petition filed by the petitioner in C.M.P.3706/2021 has been dismissed

by this Court on 06-08-2021 and this is the second bail petition.

4. The learned Public Prosecutor has submitted that occurrence happened on

07-07-2021 and the same was reported to the respondent police on the same day.

There are seven accused in this case. The defacto complainant’s native place is

Kerala and he is doing courier service. He intended to purchase van for his

business purpose through OLX Service. He contacted one Suraj and the said Suraj

informed the defacto complainant to come to Palakkad with a sum of Rs.3.0 lakhs.

As such, on the date of occurrence, on the instruction given by Suraj, the defacto

complainant along with his friends came to Karpagam College and stopped their

car. At that time, three persons intercepted the car and got into the car. They went

to a house and stopped the car. All are gone inside the house and already four

persons are there in the house. All of a sudden, they locked the house and started

to threaten the defacto complainant and assaulted the defacto complainant. They

had taken amount and two ATM cards and three cell phones from the defacto

complainant and his friends. After arrest, car has been recovered. Portion of

amount recovered. Investigation is going on. The learned Public Prosecutor

submitted CD File for this Court’s perusal.

5. This Court has considered the submissions made by either side and

perused the CD File. The petitioners in the respective petitions have been

remanded to judicial custody for the offences u/s.395 and 397 of IPC. The

petitioners in C.M.P.3662/2021 are in judicial custody from 07-07-2021 and the

petitioner in C.M.P.3706/2021 is in judicial custody from 12-07-2021. As per the

complaint, the accused persons had snatched cash, ATM Card, car and other things

from the defacto complainant. According to the petitioners in the respective

petitions, they have been falsely implicated in this case and they never committed

any offence as alleged. The learned Public Prosecutor submitted that after arrest,

car has been recovered and portion of amount has been recovered. Investigation is

going on.


offence, period of incarceration, and also considering the facts and circumstances

of the case, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners in the

respective petitions subject to the following conditions:-

(i) The petitioners in the respective petitions are ordered to be enlarged on bail

on their executing a bond for Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties for a like sum

each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, Madukkarai.

(ii) The petitioners in the respective petitions are directed to sign before

the respondent police, daily twice i.e., daily at 10.00 a.m. and 5.00 p.m.,


(iii) The petitioners in the respective petitions or their men shall not tamper the

evidence.

(iv) The petitioners in the respective petitions shall not abscond and they shall

co-operate with the investigation agency as and when required.







This common order is dictated to steno-typist, typed by her, corrected and

pronounced by me via email on this 29th day of September, 2021.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL.,


COIMBATORE.





4. The Inspector of Police, Madukkarai Police Station, Coimbatore District.

5. Counsels for the Petitioners in the respective petitions / Accused persons.


COIMBATORE.





S.Anbuselvi (Age 45 years) … Petitioner / Owner of the

W/o.Sathyamoorthy Vehicle

/vs/

State, Rep. by


Thadagam Police Station,

Crime No.262/2021

Offence: u/s.379 of IPC r/w Sec.21(1) of Mines and Minerals

(Development and Regulation Act) 1957.



This petition is filed u/s.451 r/w 457 of Cr.P.C., seeking to pass an

order to return of TATA SK 1613697TCIC/36 BSI vehicle bearing

Reg.No.TN 30 J 9820.


presence of Tvl. A.B.Sureshkumar and N.Divya, Advocates for the petitioner /

owner of the property, and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented



ORDER

This petition is filed u/s.451 r/w 457 of Cr.P.C, seeking to pass an order

to return of property i.e., TATA SK 1613697TCIC/36 BSI vehicle bearing

Reg.No.TN 30 J 9820, as interim custody to the petitioner.


The learned Public Prosecutor requested time for filing counter.

At request of learned Public Prosecutor, this petition is

adjourned to 01-10-2021.

Call on 01-10-2021, for filing counter of Public Prosecutor.



Sd/-R.SAKTHIVEL,


COIMBATORE.





4. The Inspector of Police, Thadagam Police Station, Coimbatore District.

5. Counsel for the Petitioner / Owner of the property.


COIMBATORE.





C.T.Chandran (Age 36 years)

S/o.Thangavelu … Petitioner / Accused

/vs/

State, Rep. by


Variety Hall Road Police Station,

Crime No.401/2021







presence of Tvl. B.Muralidharan and V.Thangapandian, Advocates for the




ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.401/2021 of Variety Hall Road


police, for the alleged offences u/s.406 and 420 of IPC, he has filed this petition,

seeking grant of anticipatory bail.


The learned counsel for the petitioner is present and submitted that

mediation is going on.

Submission is recorded.

Mediation Report by 08-10-2021. Till such time, the respondent

police is directed not to arrest the petitioner.



Sd/-R.SAKTHIVEL,


COIMBATORE.




3. The Inspector of Police, Variety Hall Road Police Station, Coimbatore.


5. Defacto complainant through the respondent police.

6. Mediation Centre, Coimbatore.


COIMBATORE.





1. Umamaheswaran (Age 36 years) (A-1)

S/o.Sankaran

2. Santhosh (Age 39 years) (A-2)

S/o.Sankaran … Petitioners / Accused No.1 and 2

/vs/

State, Rep. by


Selvapuram Police Station,

Crime No.480/2021.

Offence: u/s.294(b), 324 and 506(ii) of IPC.






presence of Thiru. S.R.Muthu Abbishek, Advocate for the petitioners / Accused

Nos.1 and 2 and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State,

upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and upon hearing both side


ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioners are the accused in Crime No.480/2021 of Selvapuram Police


for the alleged offences u/s.294(b), 324 and 506(ii) of IPC, they have filed this


No representation for the petitioners.


other day.


to 30-09-2021.

Call on 30-09-2021. For production of C.D.File.



Sd/-R.SAKTHIVEL,


COIMBATORE.




3. The Inspector of Police, Selvapuram Police Station, Coimbatore District.



COIMBATORE.





Saleem.A (Age 44 years)

S/o.Ameen … Petitioner / Accused

/vs/

State,


Katoor Police Station,

Crime No.Not Knwon.







presence of Tvl. M.Zackriya and T.Bharathi Raja, Advocates for the petitioner /

Accused and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State,

upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and upon hearing both side


ORDER


The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail, for the alleged offences u/s.406 and

420 of IPC.


The learned Public Prosecutor submitted that no case is registered

and no FIR is pending against the petitioner.

The submissions made by the learned Public Prosecutor is recorded.

In view of the submissions made by the Public Prosecutor, as of now,

no case is registered and no FIR is pending against the petitioner. Hence,

there is no apprehension of arrest.

Hence, this petition is dismissed.



Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL.,


COIMBATORE.




3. The Inspector of Police, Katoor Police Station, Coimbatore.



COIMBATORE.





1. M.G.Bhavani Shankar (Age 49 years)

S/o.Munial Gopal Roa.

2. B.Sangeetha (Age 42 years)

W/o.M.G.Bhavani Shankar … Petitioners / Accused

/vs/

State, Rep. by



Crime No.Not Known.

Offence: u/s.Not Known.






presence of Tvl. B.Suresh Babu, R.Vinoth Kumar, K.Loganathan,

M.Sivakumar and G.Sanjay, Advocates for the petitioners / Accused and Thiru.


petition submitted via e-mail and upon hearing both side arguments, this Court


ORDER

The petitioners seek anticipatory bail.

The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that petitioners attended

enquiry.

The learned Public Prosecutor has submitted that petitioners attended

enquiry. Enquiry is going on.

In view of the submissions, this petition is adjourned to 04-10-2021.





Sd/-R.SAKTHIVEL,


COIMBATORE.





4. Counsel for the Petitioners / Accused Persons.

thiru. a. abdul rahman, b.com., llb, judicial magistrate

Documents