the second northern greater mekong sub-region transport

Updated Resettlement and Ethnic Minority Development Plan

(Part 1 of 3)

2 March 2018

Loan 3317-VIE: The Second Northern Greater Mekong Sub-region Transport Network Improvement Project

Improvement Highway No.217, Thanh Hoa Province - Phase 2 – Section in Cam Thuy District

This combined resettlement and ethnic minority development plan is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the terms of use section of this website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area

THE SECOND NORTHERN GMS TRANSPORT NETWORK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

Improvement Highway No.217, Thanh Hoa Province - Phase 2

Updated Ressetlement and Ethnic Minority Development Plan P a g e | i i

Socialist Republic of Viet Nam Ministry of Transport

Loan 3317-VIE: The Second Northern Greater Mekong

Sub-region Transport Network Improvement Project


Updated Resettlement and Ethnic Minority Development Plan

Scope: Improvement National Highway 217 section from

Km59+900 ÷ Km76+800 in Cam Thuy District.

2 March 2018



Updated Ressetlement and Ethnic Minority Development Plan P a g e | i i i

ABBREVIATIONS

ADB = Asian Development Bank

AHs = Affected Households

APs = Affected persons

CPC = Commune Peoples' Committee

COI = Minimum corridor-of-impact

DCARB = District Compensation, Assistant Resettlement Board

DNA = Detailed Need Assessment

DMS = Detailed Measurement Survey

DOC = Department of Construction

DOF = Department of Finance

DPC = District People’s Committee

EA = Executing Agency

EM = Ethnic Minority

EMO = External Monitoring Organization

GOV = Government of Viet Nam

GMS = Greater Mekong Sub-Region

GRM = Grievance Redress Mechanism

HH = Household

IOL = Inventory of Losses

IRP = Income Restoration Program

LURC = Land Use Rights Certificate

MOLISA = Ministry of Labour - Invalids and Social Affairs

MOT = Ministry of Transport

NH1A = National Highway No. 1A

NH217 = National Highway No. 217

PIB = Public Information Booklet

PPC = Provincial Peoples' Committee

RCS = Replacement Cost Study

ROW = Right of Way

REMDP = Resettlement and Ethnic Minorities Development Plan

SES = Socio-Economic Survey

SPS = Safeguard Policy Statement

TL-PMU = Thang Long Project Management Unit

UREMDP = Updated Resettlement and Ethnic Minorities Development Plan

VND = Viet Nam Dong

CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS

(As of 2nd, March 2018)

Currency unit: Vietnam Dong (VND) and US dollar ($)

US$1 = VND 21,790



Updated Ressetlement and Ethnic Minority Development Plan P a g e | i v

GLOSSARY

Affected

Person/

Affected

Household

(AP/AH)

: Mean any person or persons, household, firm, private or public institution

that, on account of changes resulting from the Project, will have its (i)

standard of living adversely affected; (ii) right, title or interest in any house,

land, water resources or any other moveable or fixed assets acquired,

possessed, restricted or otherwise adversely affected, in full or in part,

permanently or temporarily; and/or (iii) business, occupation, place of

work or residence or habitat adversely affected, with or without

displacement. APs residing under one roof and operating as a single

economic unit are collectively referred to as an affected household (AH).

Assistance

: Means additional support provided to affected persons losing assets

(particularly productive assets), incomes, employment or sources of living,

to supplement payment of compensation for acquired assets, in order to

achieve, at a minimum, full restoration of living standards and quality of

life.

Compensation

: Means payment in cash or in kind to replace losses of lands, housing,

income and other assets caused by a project. All compensation is based

on the principle of replacement cost, which is the method of valuing

assets to replace the loss at current market rates, plus any transaction

costs such as administrative charges, taxes, registration and titling costs.

Cut-off date

: Means the date prior to which the occupation or use of any part of the

project area makes residents or occupiers or users of the same eligible to

be recognized as affected persons. In this Project, the cut-off date is the

date on which notice on land acquisition is issued by Cam Thuy District

People’s Committee and published broadly by the Commune Peoples

Committee to local communities and affected persons.

Detailed

Measurement

Survey (DMS)

: Means the finalization and/or validation of the results of the inventory of

losses (IOL), severity of impacts, and list of affected persons. The cost of

compensation, assistance and resettlement is determined following

completion of the DMS. The DMS will be carried-out by DCARB once the

benchmarks of the project site demarcation are put on the ground.

Displaced

Person (DP)

: Displaced persons are those who are physically displaced (relocation,

loss of residential land, or loss of shelter) and/or economically displaced

(loss of land, assets, access to assets, income sources, or means of

livelihoods) as a result of (i) involuntary acquisition of land, or (ii)

involuntary restrictions on land use or on access to legally designated

parks and protected areas.

Eligibility : Means any person or persons, household, firm, private or public institution

who has settled in the project area before the cut-off date, that (i) loss of

shelter, (ii) loss of assets or ability to access such assets, permanently or

temporary, or (iii) loss of income sources or mean of livelihood, regardless

of relocation will be entitled to be compensation and/or assistance.

Entitlement : Means a range of measures comprising compensation, income



Updated Ressetlement and Ethnic Minority Development Plan P a g e | v

restoration support, transfer assistance, income substitution, and

relocation support which are due to affected people, depending on the

nature of their losses, to restore their economic and social base.

Host

community

: Means the community already in residence or in the vicinity of the

proposed resettlement or relocation site.

Livelihood

restoration

: Means the re-establishment or improve of sources of income and

livelihood of relevant affected persons through the REMDP policy and its

implementation.

Income

Restoration

: Re-establishing productive livelihood of APs to enable income generation

equal to or, if possible, better than that earned by the affected persons

before being affected.

Income

Restoration

Program

: A program with various interrelated activities that aims to support severely

affected and vulnerable households in the difficult task of restoring their

standards of living to at least pre-project levels through measures that

involve enhancing productivity with the remaining human and material

assets of the AHs, and/or engaging in new or supplementary livelihood

activities. The program is designed to suit the specific needs of the

participating AHs and is subject to opportunities and resources available

to the AHs where they are located.

Involuntary

Resettlement

: Resettlement is involuntary when the APs have no right to refuse the land

acquisition by the state that result in their displacement. This occurs when

land is acquired through (i) expropriation by invoking the eminent domain

power of the state, or (ii) land is acquired through negotiated settlement

when the pricing is negotiated in a process where expropriation will be the

consequence of a failure in the negotiation.

Land recovery

(also referred

to land

acquisition)

Means the processes by which all or part of land and property owned,

possess, occupies or uses, are compulsorily recovered or otherwise

acquired from an individual, household, firm or private institution by the

State or are acquired by agreement. Decision on land recovery will be

done through two steps (i) Decision at the provincial or city for the whole

project areas and subsequently (ii) Decision by the district to each

individual.

Relocation : Means the physical relocation from the AP from his/her pre-project place

of residence and/or business.

Relocation

Assistance

: Support provided to persons who are physically displaced by the project.

Relocation assistance may include transportation, food, shelter, and social

services that are provided to the displaced persons during their relocation.

It may also include cash allowances that compensate APs for the

inconvenience associated with resettlement and defray the expenses of a

transition to a new locale, such as moving expenses and lost work days.

Replacement

Cost

: Means the amount calculated before displacement which is needed to

replace an affected asset without deductions for taxes, and/or costs of



Updated Ressetlement and Ethnic Minority Development Plan P a g e | v i

transaction as follows:

(i) Productive land (Agricultural, fishpond, garden, forest) based on market

prices that reflect recent land sales of comparable land in the district and

other nearby areas, and in the absence of such recent sales, based on

productive value;

(ii) Residential land based on market prices that reflect recent sales of

comparable houses and residential land in the district and other nearby

areas, and in the absence of such recent land sales, based on sales in

other locations with similar attributes;

(iii) Houses and other related structures based on current market prices of

materials and labor without depreciation nor deductions for salvaged

building materials;

(iv) Standing crops equivalent current market value of the crop at the time

of compensation;

(v) Perennial crops and trees, cash compensation equivalent to current

market value given the type, age and productive value (future production)

at the time of compensation.

(vi) Timber trees, the price that would currently be paid for the tress on

the nearest market based on the diameter of tree.

Replacement

Cost Study

: Means the process involved in determining the replacement cost of land,

houses and other affected assets based on surveys by a qualified

appraiser.

Resettlement : Refers to various measures provided to APs or AHs to mitigate any and all

adverse social impacts of the project, including compensation, assistance,

relocation (where relevant), and rehabilitation as needed.

Resettlement

Plan

: A time-bound action plan that includes objectives, principles, entitlements,

specific activities, responsibilities of concerned agencies, groups and

individuals, and budget for addressing the displacement of people from

assets, sources of incomes, homes, and communities towards

reconstructing their disrupted lives and improving or restoring their

standards of living to at least pre-displacement levels.

Severely

affected

Households

: This refers to AHs who (i) lose 10% or more of their productive, income

generating assets, or (ii) who must relocate (physically displaced).

Vulnerable

People

: Means individuals or distinct groups of people who might suffer

disproportionately or face the risk of being further marginalized by the

effects of land and property recovery or resettlement and specifically

includes: (i) female headed households with dependents, (ii) households

with disabled persons, (iii) households falling under the current MOLISA

benchmark poverty line, (iv) Invalids & Martyrs as under the provincial

policies and (v) non-integrated and vulnerable ethnic minorities.



Updated Ressetlement and Ethnic Minority Development Plan P a g e | v i i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY x

A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 14

B. SCOPE OF LAND RECOVERY AND RESETTLEMENT 16

2.1. Measures Taken To Minimize Negative Impacts 16

2.2. Detailed Measurement Survey (DMS) 16

2.3. Summary of impacts of land acquisition 17

C. SOCIO-ECONOMIC INFORMATION AND PROFILE 33

3.1. Profile of Household Heads (353) 33

3.2. Household Profile (1,413) 33

3.3. Gender Role 35

3.4. Ethnic Groups 36

3.5. Other Vulnerable Group 40

D. CONSULTATION AND INFORMATION DISCLOSURE 41

4.1. Objectives of Consultation and Participation 41

4.2. Consultation and Disclosure during updating of REMDP. 41

4.3. Disclosure Requirements 44

E. GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM 46

F. POLICY AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR RESETTLEMENT 48

6.1. Government Laws and Regulations 48

6.2. ADB Safeguard Policy Statement 50

6.3. Gap Analysis and Gap-Filling Measures 50

G. ENTITLEMENTS, ASSISTANCE AND BENEFITS 53

7.1. Eligibility 53

7.2. Entitlements 53

H. RELOCATION ARRANGGEMENT 60

I. INCOME RESTORATION AND REHABILITATION 61

9.1. Detailed Need Assessment on Income Restoration Measures 61

9.2. Income Restoration Activities 62

9.3. Implementation arrangement and monitoring of livelihood

restoration program for severely affected households 65

9.4. Implementation plan 66

J. RESETTLEMENT AND FINANCING PLAN 67

10.1. Study of replacement cost 67

10.2. Budget for UREMDP 67

10.3. Use of Loan Funds for Resettlement Costs 69

10.4. Disbursement of Compensation and Assistance to Affected

Households 69



Updated Ressetlement and Ethnic Minority Development Plan P a g e | v i i i

K. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS 71

11.1. Ministry of Transport 71

11.2. Thanh Hoa Provincial Peoples’ Committee 71

11.3. Cam Thuy District Peoples’ Committee 71

11.4. Commune People’s Committees (CPC) 73

11.5. Project Consultants 73

11.6. External Monitoring Organizations 73

L. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE 74

M. Monitoring and Reporting 75

13.1. Internal Monitoring 75

13.2. External Monitoring (EMO) 76

ANNEXES 77

Annex 1: Summary table of DMS and Compensation plan 78

Annex 2: SES summary tables 152

Annex 3: Public information booklet 160

Annex 4: Minutes of Consultation Meeting and list of attendees 163

Annex 5: Replacement cost decision and RCS report 261

Annex 6: Internal Monitoring Report Template 299

Annex 7: External Monitor TOR 282



Updated Ressetlement and Ethnic Minority Development Plan P a g e | i x

List of Tables

Table 1: Number of Affected Households ............................................................................. 17

Table 2: Summary of Impacts on Community/Organization .................................................. 18

Table 3: Summary of impact on land .................................................................................... 19

Table 4: Affected Residential Land by the Project................................................................. 20

Table 5: Affected Agricultural Land by the Project ................................................................ 21

Table 6: Severity of Impacts on Agricultural Land by the Project........................................... 22

Table 7: Summary of AHs with impacts on Houses ............................................................... 24

Table 8: Houses and structures on affected land .................................................................. 24

Table 9: Summary of AHs with Impacts on Trees & Crops .................................................... 26

Table 10: Affected Trees & Crops ........................................................................................... 26

Table 11: Impact on shops/businesses ................................................................................... 31

Table 12: Distribution of socio-economic sample .................................................................... 33

Table 13: Comparisons on the ownership of land and other assets between households

headed by male and female .................................................................................... 35

Table 14: Affected ethnic minority households in Cam Thuy district........................................ 37


belonging to Kinh group and Ethnic Minority Groups .............................................. 37

Table 16: Kinh and ethnic minority people (vulnerable groups) ............................................... 38

Table 17: Summary of impacts caused by the project ............................................................. 39

Table 18: Comparisons on vulnerability between Ethnic Minority and Kinh Households ......... 40

Table 19: Results of public consultations before DMS, RCS and SES activities with

affected households and community ....................................................................... 42

Table 20: Preference of Likely Affected Households for Relocation and Compensation ......... 44

Table 21: Gap Analysis and Gap-Filling Measures ................................................................. 51

Table 22: Entitlement Matrix on Compensation and Support .................................................. 54

Table 23: IRP preferences of IRP eligible households ............................................................ 62

Table 24: Proposed activities to improve and restore income ................................................. 64

Table 25: Cost estimate for income restoration programe ...................................................... 66

Table 26: Implementation schedule ........................................................................................ 66

Table 27: The UREMDP Cost Calculation .............................................................................. 68

Table 28: Indicative Implementation Schedule ........................................................................ 74

List Of Figure

Figure 1: The section from Km 59+800 to Km 104+475, NH217 ............................................ 14

Figure 2: Two bypass of section from Km 59+900 ÷ Km76+800 in Cam Thuy District ............ 15

Figure 3: Flow of Funds for resettlement ................................................................................ 69



EXECUTIVE SUMMARY P a g e | x

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1. Background

GMS Second Transport Network Improvement Project. The original scope of the Second GMS

Transport Network Improvement Project (referred to as “ongoing project”) included: (a) provision

of works for about 200 km on Route 217 including (i) improving road alignment and widening the

road formation from Km107.2 to Km195.4 (about 88 km), (ii) construction of new bypasses in Cam

Thuy (east and west) (about 3 km), (iii) pavement repair and resurfacing from Km0 to Km104.9, (iv)

stabilizing slopes and erosion protection, (v) repairing and building new road structures including

bridges and culverts, and (vi) improving traffic safety measures; and (b) provision of consulting

services in pre-construction activities in the preparation of detailed design, tender document

preparation, bid evaluation, project implementation, project management and construction

supervision, and for HIV/AIDS and human trafficking awareness and prevention program.

On 24th September, 2014, a minor change was approved of the Ministry Transport (MOT) to (i)

scale up the project scope by adding road improvements for section Km104.9 to Km107.2

(additional 2.3 km); (ii) replace the pavement repair and resurfacing from section Km0 to

Km104.9 with full replacement of unsuitable bridges; and (iii) increase the scope of consulting

services to (a) prepare detailed design, bid documents; and resettlement plans for the proposed

change in scope; and (b) update the feasibility study for full scale improvement of section

Km59+800 to Km104+900 for the proposed additional financing which traverses through Ha

Trung, Vinh Loc, Cam Thuy, Ba Thuoc and Quan Son districts in Thanh Hoa Province.

NH-217 Improvement, Thanh Hoa province - Phase 2: This component is under the Second

Northern Greater Mekong Sub region Transport Network Improvement Project, including: (i) the

improvement of the road section from Km 59+800 to Km 104+475 in Cam Thuy and Ba Thuoc

districts, and (ii) the construction of the new Flyover Bridge passing North-South railway and

NH-1A at Km 301+400 in Ha Trung district, Thanh Hoa province.

Updated Ethnic Minority Development Plan (UREMDP): This UREMDP is particularly for the

Improvement National Highway 217 section from Km 59+900 ÷ Km 76+800, Cam Thuy district

(Thanh Hoa Province). The REMDP has been updated based on (i) the agreed Resettlement and

Ethnic Minority Development Framework of the Project; (ii) The Resettlement and Ethnic Minority

Development Plan for the Road Section that was approved on 19th June, 2015 by Asian

Development Bank (ADB) and the MOT; (iii) The Detailed Measurement Survey (DMS) results

for the affected land and assets upon land; (iv) The Replacement Cost Survey (RCS) results for

the affected land and assets upon land; and (v) Additional consultation with local authorities and

affected households in the area.

2. Scope of land acquisition

Construction of the Road section from Km 59+900 ÷ Km 76+800 in Cam Thuy District will affect

1,123 households (4,919 persons), 06 public facilities in the following communes Cam Thanh,

Cam Thach, and Cam Binh, and 03 state offices (Cam Thuy DPC, Water supply company and

Power Company). There are forty four (44) households (209 persons) who have 10% and more

of total production land holding affected, 28 relocation households (124 persons)1 - these are

considered as severely affected households and 39 households (190 persons) will shift back in 1 Among severely affected households, one household is both losing 10% and more produdctive land holding and

relocated household.



EXECUTIVE SUMMARY P a g e | x i

their remaining land due to land acquisition; 492 vulnerable households (2,267 persons) are

identified among the total households affected by construction of the road section in Cam Thuy

District.

The total land area to be permanently acquired for the for construction of the road section is

140,161.9 m2, consisting of 98,466.5 m2 of agricultural land of 425 households (1,934 persons),

25,061.4 m2 of residential land (including 4,948.68 m2 of garden land in same land plot of

residential land) owned by 417 households (1,818 persons), and 31,224.7 m2 of agricultural land

is used for paddy and forest, managed by 3 People's Committee of Cam Binh, Cam Thach, Cam

Thanh communes (Cam Thuy District), and 16,634.0m2 public land in ROW of 03 communes

and 01 town. 40 out of 417 households with residential land affected will also be affected to

garden land in same land plot of residential land. Beside the compensation for gardent land at

replacement cost for agricultural land, they will be entitled to receive cash assistance equivalent

to 50% of the current market value of residential land for the affected garden land area.

Among total affected households, 902 households will be affected on houses and structures.

297 houses (9,734 m2) owned by 235 house-owners will be affected. Among houses affected, 86

houses (owned by 67 house-owners) will be fully affected and the remaining 211 houses (that

owned by 168 house-owners) will only be partially affected and will require only minor repairs. In

addition, 3,368 auxiliary structures of 667 households will be affected by project. Out of 67

houses totally affected, there are 12 houses-cum-shops (owned by 12 households). The

households will relocate their houses and shops to new residential areas.

In addition, construction of the road section will affect 189 electricity poles, 8,340 m length of wire

managed by the Power Company; 1,219.49 m length of water pipelines managed by the Water

Supply Company and 5,788 m length of Irrigation ditches managed by the Cam Thuy DPC; 242.3

m2 of concrete village road/yard, 23,5 m2 of wooden house, 30m built fence and 01 village Gate

which are the assets of 6 communities.

Out of 1,123 AHs, the road section construction will affect 17,678 fruit-trees of 787 households,

20,837 timber trees of 699 households and 33,728 m2 of crops of 457 households.

3. Policy Framework.

The legal and policy framework for compensation, assistances and rehabilitation under the

Project is defined by the relevant laws and regulations of the Government of Viet Nam and the

ADB Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS, 2009). Objectives of the project’s policy are to avoid, or, if not possible to avoid, minimize resettlement impacts, restore income and livelihoods of

affected households and improve living standards of poor and vulnerable affected households.

In case of discrepancies between the Government’s laws, regulations, and procedures and ADB's policies and requirements, the policies and requirements of the latter will prevail,

consistent with the provisions of the Decree No. 16/2016/ND-CP, dated 16th March, 2016 on

Official Development Assistance (ODA) Management and Use.

The entitlement matrix of this UREMDP is based on (i) the provisions of the agreed

Resettlement and Ethnic Minority Development Framework (ii) the provisions of the agreed

REMDP for the road section in 2015, additional consultation with affected households in 2017,

as well as the currently issued policies of Government of Vietnam on land acquisition and

resettlement. It covers the compensation and types of assistance to be provided for APs who will

be affected by the acquisition of their agricultural and residential lands, special assistances for



EXECUTIVE SUMMARY P a g e | x i i

the severely and vulnerable affected households. The Entitlement Matrix has been developed in

consultation with and agreed on by Cam Thuy District People's Committee (Thanh Hoa

Province) and affected households in the area.

Compensation for affected lands and structures will follow the principle of replacement cost. The

compensation for affected trees will be at market rate. An income restoration program will be

provided by the Project for the severely affected households and the vulnerable affected

households.

4. Grievance Redress Mechanism:

To ensure that any questions and complaints of affected people and communities involved in the

land acquisition, compensation, support and income restoration or any other aspects of the

Project are resolved in a timely and satisfactory ways through all complaint grids available to

them, a grievance redress mechanism (GRM) has been developed in accordance with the ADB

requirements and the government procedures. All affected households have been informed

about this mechanism through the Project Information Booklet that was distributed at the public

consultation meetings prior to the implementation of DMS on 21st August, 2017 (in Cam Thuy

Town), 22nd – 23rd August, 2017 (in Cam Binh Commune), 24th August, 2017 (in Cam Thanh

Commune), and 25th August, 2017 (in Cam Thach Commune).

5. Information disclosure and public consultation

In the community meetings before the DMS that were held on 21st August, 2017 (in Cam Thuy

Town), 22nd – 23rd August, 2017 (in Cam Binh Commune), 24th August, 2017 (in Cam Thanh

Commune), and 25th August, 2017 (in Cam Thach Commune), the affected households and

local authorities were provided information and consulted on the design of the road section; the

impacts on land and assets; the entitlements to compensation, assistance and relocation; the

grievance redress mechanism and the implementation schedule for compensation, assistance,

relocation and land acquisition. Information was provided by delivering the PIB to all the meeting

participants and posting of the PIB and other relevant documents in the village meeting offices

and in the house of the heads of the villages.

When the detailed compensation plan is prepared by the District Compensation, Assistance and

Resettlement Board (DCARB), including consulted on option of relocation household (21/8/2017

and 3/2/2018). it will be publicly disclosed at the commune-people's committee offices and at

public place in the village and sent to each household for 20 days for review and comments. Any

comments of affected households will be recorded and responded before the detailed

compensation plan is finalized by the DCARB.

As soon as this UREMDP is approved, it will be disclosed to affected households and local

authorities in a consultation meeting, and posted in the easy accessible places and uploaded to

ADB's website.

6. Relocation arrangement.

There are 28 relocation households in which 10 households in Cam Binh, Cam Thach, and Cam

Thanh commune registered for self-relocation in the DMS minutes, and 18 households in Cam

Thuy Town, have agree receiving cash for their self-relocation in public consultaion meeting

organized on 3rd Fecbruary 2018, (the meeting minute and household’s letter are shown in Annex

4), Besides, 39 other households have to re-build their houses on the remaining land area.



EXECUTIVE SUMMARY P a g e | x i i i

7. Income restoration program.

A Detailed Need Assessment (DNA) was conducted in October 2017 by the Social Safeguard

Consultant together with representatives of affected households, local authorities and the

DCARB. The IRP will be finalized and implemented in 12 months from April 2018.

8. Budget and Use of Loan Funds.

The total cost of compensation, support and resettlement for affected households and agencies

by the road section in Cam Thuy District is VND 152,885,405,008 (equivalent to USD

7,016,310.46), which includes the compensation and assistance costs for affected land and

assets, assistance to relocation of physically displaced households, supports to vulnerable

households, bonus for timely handover of affected land of the affected households, cost for the

income restoration program, administratiion cost (5%), and contingency (10%). The land

acquisition and resettlement related costs is financed by the ADB. The funding for independent

monitoring will be the counterpart fund of the Government of Vietnam and the Government is

ensure that the appropriate budget is delivered in time for implementation.

9. Monitoring and reporting.

To implement approved UREMDP, the internal monitoring of land acquisition, compensation,

support and resettlement activities will be carried out by the Cam Thuy District People's

Committee and TL-PMU. TL-PMU will develop an internal monitoring framework, establish a

land recovery and resettlement database to monitor whole process of resettlement

implementation. The external monitoring will be performed by an external monitoring

organization (EMO) engaged by TL-PMU. Reports on temporary land acquisition and

unforeseen impacts, (if any) will be undertaken by TL-PMU during the project development. All

monitoring reports will be uploaded to the ADB's website.

10. Implementation Arrangements.

Ministry of Transport is the executive agency of project, through TL-PMU, will be responsible for

the overall management and coordination of project. TL-PMU will be directly responsible for

internal monitoring of UREMDP implementation. Thanh Hoa PPC will be overall responsible for

resettlement activities within its administrative jurisdiction. Cam Thuy DPC is investor of

compensation, assistance and resettlenent subproject and direct its related divisions and CPCs

to implement land recovery, compensation, assistance and resettlement following the

requirements in approved UREMDP.

ADB shall not accept any award of civil works contract for any component to be financed from

the loan proceeds unless (i) this UREMDP based on DMS, RCS and additional consultations

has been submitted to and approved by ADB; (ii) compensation and allowances have been

provided in full to AHs; (iii) relocation households have relocated completely; and (iv) the income

restoration program is in place. The detailed activities and schedule of land acquisition and

resettlement are presented in this document. The UREMDP implementation will commence from

January 2018.



PROJECT DESCRIPTION P a g e | 1 4

A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

1. The Second Northern Greater Mekong Sub-region Transport Network Improvement

Project - Improvement of National Highway 217 - Phase 2, Thanh Hoa province includes

the upgrading of the section from Km 59 + 800 to Km 104 + 475 and the Flyover Bridge

passing the North-South railway and the NH-1A at Km 301 + 400, passing through the

districts of Ha Trung, Cam Thuy and Ba Thuoc, Thanh Hoa province.

2. The Project’s total investment is US$ 94.7 million (equivalent to VND 1,899.3 billion), of which ADB lends US$ 75 million and the counterpart fund of the Vietnamese government

is US$ 22.4 million.

3. The section from Km 59 + 800 to Km 104 + 475 in Cam Thuy and Ba Thuoc districts will be

expanded and upgraded up to Grade-III mountain road standard. The road is designed at

the speed of 60 km/h. The roadbed is 9m wide. The road surface is 6m wide. The

minimum curve is 125 (60). The culvert design load is H30-XB80. The bridge design load

is HL93.

Figure 1: The section from Km 59+800 to Km 104+475, NH217



PROJECT DESCRIPTION P a g e | 1 5

4. Section from Km 59+900 ÷ Km 76+800 in Cam Thuy District: it is mainly widened two

sides of route. Due to technical requirement, two bypasses are proposed in which (i)

section at Km59+800 – Km60+300 has total length of 400m. The bypass creates a

crossroad at the beginning of route and improves two reverse curves with small radius

(R=30-40M) which is the black spot of traffic accident on the route, (ii) section at

Km70+100 – Km72+500 has total length of bypass of 2.25km. The bypass is on the right

of old route, crosses old road at Km 71, runs to the left of old road to avoid residential area,

crosses Chieng Cham stream,and then combines with old road at…

Figure 2: Two bypass of section from Km 59+900 ÷ Km76+800 in Cam Thuy District

Bypass: Km59+800 – Km60+300

Bypass: Km70+100 – Km72+500



SCOPE OF LAND RECOVERY AND RESETTLEMENT P a g e | 1 6

B. SCOPE OF LAND RECOVERY AND RESETTLEMENT

2.1. Measures Taken To Minimize Negative Impacts

5. To mitigate impacts on land acquisition by the road section construction, TL-PMU

cooperated with the Detailed Design Consultant and the People's Committee of Cam Thuy

district to take the following measures:

a. The proposed road is mainly widened to two sides to mitigate land acquisition and

impact on environment;

b. Two bypasses are proposed to mitigate traffic accident and avoid inundation as well

as site clearance;

(i) Total length of first bypass is about 400m with start point at Km59+900 and

combines with old road at km60+300. The bypass creates a crossroad at the

beginning of route and improves two reverse curves with small radius

(R=30-40M) which is the black spot of traffic accident on the route. In addition,

adjustment of route also reduces impact on land acquisition when widening the

route on the existing road bed.

(ii) Beginning point of second bypass at Km70+100 has total length of 2.25km.

The bypass is on the right of old road, crosses old road at Km 71, runs to the

left of old road to avoid residential area, crosses Chieng Cham stream,and

then combines with old road at Km72+ 500. New route mainly runs on

agricultural land, forest land on hill to avoid inundation area and reduce land

acquisition due to increasing the height of oald route in order to avoid affecting

residential area.

c. The camps and yards for gathering equipment and materials of construction

contractors will be located in the appropriate areas on non-production land and this

land is under management of CPCs.

d. The construction will be monitored by people in the project area, communities, and

monitoring agency to ensure that impacts on surrounding land of households are

minimized.

e. Other than the aforementioned, the DPC will ensure that the payment of

compensation and assistance for AHs are completed prior to the issuance of notice

to proceed to start construction works.

2.2. Detailed Measurement Survey (DMS)

6. As soon as Cam Thuy District People's Committee issued Land Acquisition Notice No.

69/UBND-TNMT dated 26th August, 2016, the following activities were implemented:

a. Land acquisition notice was sent to each Ah and all AHs.

b. A specialized consultancy unit is hired by Cam Thuy district to measure cadastral

map, establish land dossier to serve compensation activity. Measurement activity

had been conducted since August 2017 and completed in September 2017.

c. The DMS was conducted in September 2017 by the Working Group established by

the People's Committee of Cam Thuy district. Two Working Groups consists of

professional staffs from the Department of Natural Resources and Environment, the




Department of Finance, the Department of Infrastructure Economics, the

Department of Agriculture and Rural Development, District’s PMU, together with

cadastral officers of communes and heads of villages. In addition, the

representatives of affected households and communities are members of the

DCARB who directly participated and supervised the DMS and the household

participated in DMS for their impacts. The DMS records were checked and signed by

the AHs with witnesses of the village leaders and representatives of

mass-organizations.

2.3. Summary of impacts of land acquisition

Impacts on households and community

7. According to DMS result, there are 1,123 households (4,919 persons) affected by the

construction of the road section in Cam Binh, Cam Thach, Cam Thanh communes and

Cam Thuy town of Cam Thuy district (Thanh Hoa Province). Out of 1,123 affected

households, 425 households will be permanently affected agricultural land, 417

households will be affected residential land, the remaining households will be only affected

either secondary structures or crops and trees. In addition, 06 public commune facilities

will be affected of their non-land assets.

8. 71 AHs are determined as Severely Affected Households2 due to losing 10% and more of

agricultural land holding (44 AHs with 209 persons) and due to totally affected to main

house then have to relocate in new place (28 AH with 124 persons).

9. Out of 1,123 affected households, 492 (2,267 persons) households are identified as

vulnerable households of which 8 households (30 persons) are poor households, 25

households (124 persons) of war invalids and martyrs and social policy beneficiaries

households, 11 households (43 persons) with disabled people, 25 households (80

persons) are female headed households, and 423 households (1,990 persons) belong to

Ethnic Minority group3.

10. Details of impacts on households and community are shown in Table 1 and Table 2

Table 1: Number of Affected Households

Commune/ town No. of

AHs

No. of

APs

No. of Severely AHs Vulnerable AHs

No. of AHs No. of APs No. of AHs No. of APs

Cam Thuy 158 684 18 76 31 134

Cam Binh 484 2,111 6 24 226 1,047

Cam Thach 194 882 7 33 100 482

Cam Thanh 287 1,242 40 187 135 604

Total 1,123 4,919 71 320 492 2,267

Source: DMS October, 2017.

2 Actual number of Severely Affected Households by project is 71 as 01 relocation households also losing 10% and

more of agricultural land holding (in Cam Thuy Town). 3 Actual number of Ethnic Minority affected by project is 447 however 24 EM households also belong to other

vulnerable groups therefore the number of EM households mentioned here is only 423.




Table 2: Summary of Impacts on Community/Organization

Community/ Organization Quantity Impacts

Cam Binh, Cam Thach and Cam Thanh communes

3 Public Lands, structures, and trees

- Forest control station, To 2 Village in Cam Binh commune,

- Petrol station in Cam Thach commune

- Health station, Kindergarten, Secondary school in Cam Thanh commune.

6 Community assets

- 242.3 m2 concrete road and yard,

- 23.5 m2 wooden house of Forest control station

- 30m built fence, 01 village gate

Cam Thuy DPC 1 5,788 m Irrigation canal

Water supply company 1 1,219.49 m of water pipeline

Thanh Hoa Power Company 1 - 35Kv (36 poles and 3,297m cable);

- 0.4kV ( 153 poles and 5,043m cable);

- Two Substation.


Impact on Land.

11. Total permanently acquired land area by the road section construction is 140,161.9 m2,

consisting of 98,466.5 m2 of agricultural land owned by 425 households (1,934 persons)

and agricultural land managed by 03 CPCs, 25,061.4 m2 of residential land (including

4,948.68 m2 of garden land in same land plot of residential land) owned by 417

households (1,818 persons), and 16,634.0 m2 of public land on ROW of 03 communes

and 01 town which is confirmed in cadastral documents signed by households, CPCs, and

the Consultants who prepare cadastral map. All affected households have land use right

certificate so they are the affected legal land users.

12. Out of 417 households who have residential land affected, 28 households (124 persons)

will have residential land totally or almost acquired and the remaining residential land area

is not sufficient to stay (the households will have to relocate in new places), 39 households

(190 persons) will only need to shift back in their remaining land and 350 remaining

households (1,504 persons) will have residential land partially recovered and the

remaining land area is still sufficient to stay.

13. 40 out of 417 households with residential land affected will also be affected to garden land

in same land plot of residential land. Beside the compensation for gardent land at

replacement cost for agricultural land, they will be entitled to receive cash assistance

equivalent to 50% of the current market value of residential land for the affected garden

land area

14. The total agricultural land to be permanently acquired is 98,466.5 m2, including 47,436.1

m2 of land for annual crops, 3,099.8 m2 of perennial trees land, 773.3 m2 of aquaculture

land, 46,451.8 m2 of forest land, and 705.5 m2 of unused land; Out of total 98,466.5 m2




agricultural land, 67,241.8 m2 is agricultural land of 425 households and 31,224.7 m2 is

agricultural land managed by CPCs of three communes Cam Binh, Cam Thach and Cam

Thanh.

15. Out of 425 households (1,934 persons) who have agricultural land permanently acquired,

there are 34 households (164 persons) losing from 10% to less than 30% of their total land

holding in which 05 AHs (19 persons) are in Cam Binh commune, 05 AHs (25 persons) are

in Cam Thach commune, 24 AHs (120 persons) are in Cam Thanh commune, 06

households (29 persons) losing from 30% to 70% of their total agricultural land holding, 04

AHs (16 persons) losing more than 70% of their total agricultural land holding.

16. Summary of impacts on land are show in the tables 3, table 4 and table 5 below.

Table 3: Summary of impact on land

Commune/ town

Residential

land area

affected

(m2)

Agricultural

land area

affected

(m2)

Public land

in ROW

(m2)

Total land area

permanently

acquired

(m2)

Cam Thuy 6,436.60 167.90 1,443.00 8,047.50

Cam Binh 5,926.70 17,470.10 4,069.00 27,465.80

Cam Thach 721.20 7,212.80 5,140.00 13,074.00

Cam Thanh 11,976.90 42,391.00 5,982.00 60,349.90

Communes land 31,224.70 31,224.70

Total 25,061.40 98,466.50 16,634.00 140,161.90





Table 4: Affected Residential Land by the Project

Commune/

town

Area affected (m2) Household affected (AHs, APs)

Residential Garden Total Total affected

Required

Relocation

Shift back on their

remaining land

No Relocation

required

AHs APs AHs APs AHs APs AHs APs

Cam Thuy 5,843.00 593.60 6,436.6 105 462 18 84 32 152 55 226

Cam Binh 4,547.40 1,379.30 5,926.7 153 674 1 5 0 0 152 669

Cam Thach 596.50 124.70 721.2 31 127 2 8 1 3 28 116

Cam Thanh 9,125.82 2,851.08 11,976.9 128 555 7 27 6 35 115 493

Total 20,112.72 4,948.68 25,061.40 417 1,818 28 124 39 190 350 1,504





Table 5: Affected Agricultural Land by the Project

Commune/ town

Agricultural land

Area affected (m2) Total

Land for

annual crops

Land for

perennial trees Aquaculture Forest Unused Area AHs APs

Cam Thuy 0.0 167.9 0.0 0.0 167.9 1 2

Cam Binh 17,254.6 126.2 0.0 89.3 17,470.1 230 1,031

Cam Thach 5,742.4 198.6 0.0 1,271.8 7,212.8 80 401

Cam Thanh 22,339.8 2,607.1 773.3 16,670.8 42,391.0 114 500

Public land 2,099.3 28,419.9 705.5 31,224.7

Total 47,436.1 3,099.8 773.3 46,451.8 705.5 98,466.5 425 1,934





Table 6: Severity of Impacts on Agricultural Land by the Project

Commune/

town

Severity of impacts on agricultural land

(losing 10% and more of total production land holding of the household)

10% - < 30% 30% - 70% From more than 70% Total

No. of AHs No. of APs No. of AHs No. of APs No. of AHs No. of APs No. of AHs No. of APs

Cam Thuy 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 2

Cam Binh 5 19 0 0 0 0 5 19

Cam Thach 5 25 0 0 0 0 5 25

Cam Thanh 24 120 6 29 3 14 33 163

Total 34 164 6 29 4 16 44 209





Impact on structures.

17. There are 902 households (3,921 persons) whose houses and structures will be affected

by the road sections construction. Out of them, 235 households with 297 main houses will

be affected, of which 67 households (314 persons) with 86 houses are totally affected (28

household with 124 persons will be relocated and 39 households with 190 persons have to

shift back on their remaining land). The 168 households remaining (711 persons) are

partially affected 211 houses.

18. Besides the impacts on houses, project also affected to 3,368 auxiliary structures of 667

households such as gate, concrete yard, side ditch, culverts, water tanks, brick wall,

kitchen, bath room, restroom, etc. Details of impact on auxiliary structure and quantity are

presented in table 7 and table 8 below.

19. For the affected public facility/community assets such as concrete road/yard (242.3 m2),

wooden house (23.5 m2), Built Fence (30 m), Village Gate (01) include: (i) Forest Ranger

Station, To 2 village in Cam Binh commune; (ii) Petrol stations in Cam Thach commune; (iii)

Health stations, Kindergarten, Primary school in Cam Thanh commune, will be calculated

at replacement cost and paid in cash for the communities. During the process of

constructing road, construction unit is responsible for ensuring traffic safety for business

and production activities of units mentioned above.

20. For affected assets of the state offices: 189 electricity poles, 8,340 m length of wire

managed by the Power Company, 1,219.49 m2 length of water pipe (Ø150) managed by

the Water Supply Company will be removed, and 5,788 m Irrigation ditches of under

management of Cam Thuy DPC.




Table 7: Summary of AHs with impacts on Houses

(Local

commune/town)

Partially Affected (HH) Fully Affected (HH) Total

No. of AHs No. of House No. of APs No. of AHs No. of House No. of APs No. of AHs No. of House No. of APs

Cam Thuy 37 48 147 50 65 236 87 113 383

Cam Binh 79 97 345 1 1 5 80 98 350

Cam Thach 7 9 33 3 4 11 10 13 44

Cam Thanh 45 57 186 13 16 62 58 73 248

Total 168 211 711 67 86 314 235 297 1,025


Table 8: Houses and structures on affected land

# Items

Cam Thuy District (commune/town) Total

Cam Thuy Cam Binh Cam Thach Cam Thanh

HH Q. ty HH Q. ty HH Q. ty HH Q. ty HH Q. ty

1 Houses 87 113 80 98 10 13 58 73 235 297

2 Auxiliary structures 204 865 347 967 121 302 230 845 902 2,979

3 Built Fence 99 113 116 136 27 36 86 104 3284 389


4 Such households are included in 902 households with auxiliary structure affected already.




Impact on Trees and Crops.

21. Out of total 1,123 AHs, 787 AHs have 17,678 of fruit-trees affected; 699 AHs have 20,8237

timbers trees affected; and 457 AHs have 29,528 m2 of crops affected. Many households

are affected on both crops and trees.

22. In term of affected fruit trees, banana is the main tree affected (12,306 trees). In term of affected

timber, bamboo is the main tree affected (17,108 trees). The most affected crop is paddy

(15,694.2 m2). Affected fruit trees, timber trees, crops are listed in Table 9 and Table 10 below.




Table 9: Summary of AHs with Impacts on Trees & Crops

No. Items Unit

Cam Thuy Town Cam Binh commune Cam Thach

commune

Cam Thanh

commune Total

Q.ty No. of

AHs Q.ty

No. of

AHs Q.ty

No. of

AHs Q.ty

No. of

AHs Q.ty

No. of

AHs

1 Fruit Tree Tree 1,959 145 2,737 351 2,023 118 10,959 173 17,678 787

2 Timber Tree Tree 2,112 125 1,614 313 1,089 130 16,022 131 20,837 699

3 Crops

m2/

Cluster/

tree

5,910 51 16,839 244 1,589 81 5,552 81 29,527 457


Table 10: Affected Trees & Crops

No. Type Unit Cam Thuy

Town

Cam Binh

commune

Cam Thach

commune

Cam Thanh

commune Total

Fruit-Tree 1,959 2,737 2,023 10,959 17,678

1 Avocado tree 2 1 6 9

3 "Bo Quan" tree tree 15 15

2 Grapefruit tree 34 43 5 203 285

4 Orange tree 1 1 12 14

5 Palm-tree (Areca) tree 91 9 379 479

6 Lemon tree 26 13 1 76 116

7 passion fruit tree 6 6





Town

Cam Binh

commune

Cam Thach

commune

Cam Thanh

commune Total

8 Banana tree 1,057 1,778 1,794 7,677 12,306

9 Ambarella tree 1 1 2

10 Peach tree 12 12 36 60

11 Berry tree 39 1 40

12 Baccaurea tree 4 8 6 13 31

13 Papaya tree 97 94 90 143 424

14 Pineapple tree 15 613 628

15 Coconut tree 32 20 37 89

16 Momordica cochinchinensis tree 2 13 52 67

17 Areca tree 1 1 2

18 Sapodilla tree 2 3 2 4 11

19 Star fruit tree 27 8 2 51 88

20 Pear tree 4 4

21 Pomegranate tree 1 1 2

22 Mac mat tree 1 2 3 6

23 Plum-tree tree 1 5 6

24 Sapote tree 8 12 1 48 69

25 Me tree tree 4 29 33

26 Jackfruit tree 27 14 146 187

27 Custard-Apple tree 97 90 19 140 346





Town

Cam Binh

commune

Cam Thach

commune

Cam Thanh

commune Total

28 Logan tree 144 284 31 686 1,145

29 Oleaster tree 2 2 10 14

30 Guava tree 34 47 9 230 320

31 Kumquat tree 17 3 23 43

32 Bell Fruit tree 2 4 9 15

33 Dracontomelon tree 15 14 5 34

34 Fig tree 60 71 21 52 204

35 Apple tree 3 19 8 8 38

36 Dragon fruit tree 6 14 45 65

37 Gold Apple tree 1 1

38 Muntingia tree 4 6 3 2 15

39 Lekima (eggfruit) tree 20 9 3 37 69

40 Litchi tree 3 5 24 32

41 Star Apple tree 34 83 2 17 136

42 Mango tree 37 66 9 110 222

Timber Tree 2,112 1,614 1,089 16,022 20,837

1 Cypress tree 2 3 4 9

2 Terminalia catappa tree 12 43 4 18 77

3 storax tree 8 8

4 Fructus Gleditschiae tree 4 4





Town

Cam Binh

commune

Cam Thach

commune

Cam Thanh

commune Total

5 Palm tree 1 49 50

6 banian-tree tree 4 14 3 16 37

7 Beech tree 5 5

8 Gao tree tree 11 18 3 4 36

9 Menghundor tree 22 26 3 80 131

10 Other timber tree 9 108 117

11 Milk Flower tree 6 32 17 26 81

12 Acacia tree 53 70 40 899 1,062

13 Chukrasia tabularis tree 25 96 9 146 276

14 Ironwood (Tali) tree 0

15 Barringtonia acutangula tree 14 20 2 27 63

16 Golden Shower Tree tree 3 19 22

17 Ficus microcarpa L tree 76 268 27 371

Moraceae tree 8 10 18

18 Flamboyant tree 18 17 11 15 61

19 Cinnamon tree 101 101

20 Dalbergia tonkinensis Prain tree 11 20 69 100

21 Pine Wood tree 60 3 63

22 Dracaena fragrans tree 54 8 2 21 85

23 Canari tree 6 6





Town

Cam Binh

commune

Cam Thach

commune

Cam Thanh

commune Total

24 Santai wood tree 214 214

25 Bamboo tree 1,629 719 954 13,806 17,108

26 Crinum Latifolium tree 12 12

27 Magnolia dandyi tree 1 10 11

28 Cleistocalyx Operculatus tree 7 7

29 Faux Acajen tree 6 43 1 4 54

30 China - berry tree 87 195 9 357 648

Crops 5,922 16,731 1,589 5,286 29,527

1 Gourd m2 3 86 89

2 Medicinal plant m2 604 289 148 2,503 3,544

3 Indian taro m2 8 45 10 144 207

4 Dong tree m2 5 9 253 267

5 Flower all kind m2 512 952 192 70 1,726

6 Sweet Potato m2 305 100 10 146 561

7 Taro m2 5 77 82

8 Sugercane m2 259 292 1,999 2,550

9 Chili m2 54 4 1 59

10 Vegetable m2 3,538 688 510 4,736

11 Kudzu m2 8 5 13

12 Paddy m2 888 14,378 421 8 15,694





Impact on business.

23. There are 12 households with houses-cum-shops affected. These households are living

along NH 217. The affected households will relocate his/her houses and shops to new

residential areas. These households are all non-registered business and cash assistance

based on estimated net income of shop will be provided. Net income will be based on the

average monthly income indicated in the tax receipts (3,500,000 VND/month) and in 3

months.

24. The 30 mobile shops in front of the house on public land in right-of-way are made of

temporary materials that will only take few hours to dismantle and shift back to their

existing house, adjacent to the ROW. There is no disruption in business of households.

Affected structures will be compensation at replacement cost.

Table 11: Impact on shops/businesses

Commune/ town

Partially Affected

(AHs)

Fully Affected

(AHs)

Total

(AHs)

Cam Thuy town 6 5 11

Cam Binh commune 12 2 14

Cam Thach commune 6 0 6

Cam Thanh commune 6 5 11

Total 30 12 42


Impact on vulnerable group and Ethnic minority group

25. The road section will be widened mainly based on the existing road except two bypasses

with short lengths and near to the existing alignment therefore there is no impact on the

heritage, culture or dignity of EM groups in project area. Impact of road construction to

vulnerable group and EM group is mainly due to land acquisition. Mitigation measures will

be provided to vulnerable and EM households through compensation, assistance and

resettlement entitlement. The vulnerable households including EM households will receive

assistance for vulnerable households as regulated in Entitlement Matrix and they will be

entitled to participate in Income Restoration Program of project presented later in Chapter

I below. During consultation process, language use and aspiration of vulnerable especially

EM households will be paid more attention by project and local authorities and local

interpreter will be arranged when needed. Thus, it is not necessary to have a separated

EMDP and it is combined with RP in this document called REMDP.

26. A total of 492 vulnerable households will be affected by subproject, in which, 447

households belonging to EM groups however 24 EM households also belong to other

vulnerable groups therefore the number of EM households mentioned in some parts of

document is only 423. Details on vulnerable households and EM households will be

presented in next Chapter C– Socio Economic Information and Profile.




Other impacts

27. For affected assets of the organizations: affect 189 electricity poles, 8,340 m length of wire

managed by the Power Company, 1,219.49 m2 length of water pipe (Ø150) managed by

the Water Supply Company will be removed, and 5,788 m Irrigation ditches under

management of Cam Thuy DPC. It will be established cost estimate of removing and

newly constructing works to restore to the owner (in-kind compensation). Mitigation

measures shall be applied during the removal of public works to avoid any disturbances or

interruption in life and production of local households. In case there is additional land

acquisition for construction of public works, Project shall conduct updated DMS for such

works and implement land acquisition, compensation resettlement for households as

regulated in this REMDP and inform in writing to ADB in advance.

28. Temporary impacts during construction period. The guidance for the mitigation measures

shall be presented adequately in the detailed design, bidding documents and contractor

instruction document for following items such as campsites, equipment, dumping area,

material mine and temporary bypasses. The location, requirements for temporary land

acquired and impacts on non-land assets will be determined during project implementation

by the contractor. All measures to avoid and minimize impacts are requested, if it is not

avoidable, the contractors have to negotiate with affected households or community and

pay for the losses, damages and renting cost at market prices. After construction,

contractors shall return the land to user and restore it as pre-project condition.

29. The temporary and other impacts mentioned above will be monitored later by Construction

Supervision Consultant and by External monitoring organization and shall be recorded in

their reports.



SOCIO-ECONOMIC INFORMATION AND PROFILE P a g e | 3 3

C. SOCIO-ECONOMIC INFORMATION AND PROFILE

30. The socio-economic survey (SES) on affected households was conducted by the Social

Safeguards Consultant in October 2017. The total number of participants to the survey

includes 353/1,123 households (31.4 % of the total of the affected households), which are

divided in Table below.

Table 12: Distribution of socio-economic sample

Town/ Commune Total of

AHs Total Number of

severely AHs Total sample

HHs Percentage

(%)

Cam Thuy town 158 18 83 52.5%

Cam Binh commune 484 6 160 33.1%

Cam Thach commune 194 7 51 26.3%

Cam Thanh commune 287 40 59 20.6%

Total 1,123 71 353 31.4%

(Source: DMS & SES October 2017)

3.1. Profile of Household Heads (353)

Out of 353 surveyed households, 286 households are headed by men and 67 are

headed by women. 210 of the respondents are between 40-60 yrs. old (59.5%),

followed by 82 respondents who are more than 60 years old (23.2%). The remaining

61 respondents are between 20-40 years old.

16 of the respondents (4.5%) reached upper secondary/vocational level. Those who

reached primary and lower secondary are at 37.4% (132 respondents) and 27.2 %

(96 respondents), respectively. Only 63 respondent reached pre-school while 41

respondent went to university.

Of the 353 respondents are engaged in farming (124 respondents). 89 of them

(27.7%) are engaged in business activities while 5 are employed in private sector. Of

the 30 respondents who claimed that they are already retired, only 10 of them

claimed that they have pensions.

Occupations of HH Heads, there are 124 HHs (35%) occupation in Famer and fish,

and 89 (25%) self-employment/ Business owner or private sector employee. Detail

in Annex 2 - Table 5

Of the 353 HHs respondents on income are average 8,019,000 VND/month, HHs

from Cam Thuy town earn more than HHs from Cam Binh commune Cam Thach

commune, Cam Thanh commune 9,746,000 VND, 9,155,000 VND, 4,705,000 VND

and 5,375,000 VND respectively. Meanwhile, HH headed by men earn more than

HHs headed by women. Detail in Annex 2 - Table 6 and Table 7.

3.2. Household Profile (1,413)

The average household size is 4,28

330 members or 23.4% are engaged in faming while 296 member are student

(20.9%). The rest are business (238 members or 16.8%), Hired labor 158 member

(11.2%), retirees 56 respondents (15 with pension and 41 without pension and doing




housework), 39 member engaged in Livestock, 31 of the members stated they are

looking for work.

As source of drinking water in Cam Thuy town, Cam Binh, Cam Thach, Cam Thanh

commune, almost using shallow well is at 53.3% (40 HHs), 43.8% (70 HHs), 56.9%

(29 HHs), and 40.7% (24 HHs); while households who are dependent on deep well

is 33.3% (25 HHs), 34.4% (55 HHs), 39.2% (20 HHs), 59.3% (35 HHs) respectively.

Only 6 households (8%), 6 households (3.8%) and 01 households (2%) are

connected to the water supply system in Cam Thuy town, Cam Binh and Cam Thach

commune. Still depend on Canal, river, pond, stream as source of drinking water are

4 households (5.3%), 29 households (18.1%) and 01 households (2%) in Cam Thuy

town, Cam Binh and Cam Thach commune. Connection to electricity is 100%.

For cooking, households use gas/kerosene at more than 89.8% respectively. Wood

and electricity is also used at lower than 8.0 %.

Types of toilet are septic-tank and semi-septic tank at 44%, 56% (in Cam Thuy town),

40%, 60% in Cam Binh, 54.9%, 45.1% in Cam Thach, and 54.2%, 45.8% in Cam

Thanh commune respectively. Don’t have any pit latrine

Almost half of the respondents (239 AHs or 67.7%) responded that they earn more

than 5,000,000 VND per month followed by those who earn between 3,000,000 VND

– 5,000,000 VND per month at 15.3%. There are 9 households who earn income

1,000,000 VND per month and another 51 households who earned between

1,000,000 – 3,000,000 VND per month (23.7%). Those who earn more than

5,000,000 VND per month are engaged in business, who are employed, and have

pension. Those who earn less than 5,000,000 VND per month depend on social

assistance.

According to respondents, on average 2,608,000 VND per month is spent for food

while education expenses is at 877,750 VND per month. Transportation and

communication is 331,250 VND per month while those who spend on medical care

is also at 205,750 VND per month. Electricity and fuel for cooking is 371,750 VND

per month. Those who spent on festivals and events, they spend an average of

280,500 VND. For households who have debts, they pay from 386,500 VND per

month on average. Clothing/footwear and purchase of furniture are at 243,000 VND

and 467,000 VND per month.

For the 94 households who have loans, 28 of them used it for business, while 8 of

them is for farming, and animal raising (29), Twelve household used it for building

house. The rest were for education (17), and hospital expenses (0).

On asset ownership, each household have at least 1-2 electric fans, 1-2 motorbikes,

1 rice cooker, a TV, a bike. There is a low number of households who have

telephone or mobile phones (340 households or 2,19%).

All households own chickens and ducks.

20 AHs respondents they are have savings.

31. The respondents were also asked about their opinion about project impacts. 48.5 percent

responded that better roads mean improved access to education and health and 42.0




percent responded that good for business and 5.6 percent responded other better. In

terms of negative impacts, they mentioned increased in traffic (62.9 %), increased social

problems at 26.9% and other impact at 10.2%. When asked if they are interested to take

part in any project works, 25 of the respondents stated that they are interested to work for

the Project.

3.3. Gender Role

32. Special attention was paid to the women’s position in the affected area in the process of

updating REMDP, especially during the village level consultations and SES. During village

consultations, women were always invited and encouraged to participate in the meetings.

They all voiced their support to the Project and indicated that with road improvement, their

health and socioeconomic conditions condition could be enhanced greatly due to better

and easy access to urban towns. Their agricultural products could be more easily

transported to the market all year round, which could bring in more cash income for their

families.

33. To better understand the socio-economic conditions of households, especially those

headed by women, the SES was disaggregated and analyzed. As indicated in Table below

and could be expected, the households headed by women are disadvantaged below

averages in many respects, including agricultural land area, income, households assets,

house structures, etc. The per capita monthly income of VND 6,940,000 of households

headed by women is only about 83.9 % of the average compared to those households

headed by men.


headed by male and female

Indicators Unit

Male

headed

household

Female

headed

household

Compared

percentage

(%)

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) = (4)/(3)

1. Sample size HHs 286 67 23.43%

2. Ownership and use of land

2.1. Average Residential land

owned by household

(m2) 248 239 96.37%

2.2. Aevrage Agricultural land

owned by household

(m2) 772 725 93.91%

3. Ownership on other Assets

3.1 Electric fan No.HH 277 65 23.47%

3.2. Telephone/mobile No.HH 275 65 23.64%

3.3. Motorbike No.HH 260 61 23.46%

3.4. TV No.HH 272 65 23.90%

3.5. Bike No.HH 207 49 23.67%




Indicators Unit

Male

headed

household

Female

headed

household

Compared

percentage

(%)

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) = (4)/(3)

3.6. Rice cooker No.HH 257 60 23.35%

4. Occupation and Main

income source of headed of

households

4.1. Cultivation HH% 31.47% 50.75%

4.2. Cultivation /aquaculture HH%

4.3. Business owner/small

trading shop

HH% 26.91% 17.91%

4.4. Other HH% 41.62% 31.34%

5. Monthly income VND/ Capita 8,272,000 6,940,000 83.90%

6. Average Housing area Sq.m/HH 87.6 27.97 31.93%

7. House type

7.1. Best Class (7, 8, 9, 10, 11,

12) % of HH 20.9 19.3

7.2. Medium Class (2, 3, 4, 5, 6) % of HH 66.2 65.4

7.3. Poorest Class (1, 13, 14) % of HH 12.9 15.3


3.4. Ethnic Groups

34. Ethnic composition in the Thanh Hoa province includes Kinh (majority ethnic group in

Vietnam), Dao, Mong, Lao, Lu, Muong, Red Thai, Thai and Tho. In the Project area,

ethnic groups include Kinh, Thai, Muong, and Dao only. In the surveyed area, Muong is

the dominant ethnic group.

35. Ethnic Minorities in Cam Thuy District represent approximately 55% of the total district

population while Kinh group (majority ethnic group in Vietnam) represents 45%. The main

ethnic minority group in Cam Thuy is Muong which constitutes 52.4% of the local

population.

36. The Muong, Thai, and Dao in the area self-identify as distinct ethnic groups and are

recognized as ethnic minority groups by the Government. They are, however, generally

well integrated in mainstream society. They typically maintain their own language, but are

fluent in Vietnamese and have generally high rates of literacy. Their livelihood patterns are

indistinguishable from mainstream society. There are no reported distinctions in lifestyle,

although some of the work done in forestry may be linked to ethnic minority heritage.

While they have an attachment to the local area, all land is privately occupied through the

land user right regime and there is no collective land ownership. Intermarriage between




the ethnic groups is common. There are no formal traditional leadership structures, yet

community elders hold respected positions within their respective communities.

37. Affected ethnic minority households: Out of total number of 1,123 AHs, there are 447 AHs

under ethnic minority groups (39.8%), including 312 AHs of Muong group (71.8%), 113

AHs of Thai group (25.3%) and 13 belong to other EM group (2.9%).

Table 14: Affected ethnic minority households in Cam Thuy district

Ethnic Groups Total % Male Female

Total 447 100% 320 127

Muong 321 71.8% 230 91

Thai 113 25.3% 81 32

Other 13 2.9% 9 4


38. In line with their geographic distribution, the situation of the ethnic groups who are living in

the mountain districts, despite having slightly bigger agricultural landholding, still earn less

than the Kinh households who are concentrated in the plain districts. The following table

further compares the sample ethnic groups and Kinh households.

Table 15: Comparisons on the ownership of land and other assets between

households belonging to Kinh group and Ethnic Minority Groups

Indicators Unit Kinh

Households

EM

Households

Compared

percentage

(%)

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) = (4)/(3)

1. Sample size HHs 224 129 57.6%

2. Ownership and use of land

2.1. Average Residential land

owned by household

(m2) 248 239 96.4%

2.2. Average Agricultural land

owned by household

(m2) 768 729 94.9%

3. Ownership on other Assets

3.1 Electric fan No.HH 217 125 57.6%

3.2. Telephone/mobile No.HH 216 124 57.4%

3.3. Motorbike No.HH 204 117 57.4%

3.4. TV No.HH 213 122 57.3%

3.5. Bike No.HH 162 94 58.0%

3.6. Rice cooker No.HH 201 116 57.7%

4. Occupation and Main




Indicators Unit Kinh

Households

EM

Households

Compared

percentage

(%)

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) = (4)/(3)

income source of headed of

households

4.1. Cultivation HH% 35.27% 34.88%

4.2. Cultivation / aquaculture HH%

4.3. Business owner/small

trading shop

HH% 30.36% 16.28%

4.4. Others HH% 34.37% 48.84%

5. Monthly income VND/Capita 8,545,000 7,106,000 83.2%

6. Average Housing area Sq.m/HH 89.6 67.6 75.4%

7. House type

7.1. Best Class (7, 8, 9, 10, 11,

12) % of HH 25.9% 14.3%

7.2. Medium Class (2, 3, 4, 5, 6) % of HH 64.3% 67.3%

7.3. Poorest Class (1, 13, 14) % of HH 9.8% 18.4%


39. Out of vulnerable groups, number of ethnic minority households is much higher than

number of Kinh households. According to SES, 492 out of 447 vulnerable households of the

project are under ethnic minority groups, accounting for 90.9 %.

Table 16: Kinh and ethnic minority people (vulnerable groups)

Commune/ town

Number of

vulnerable

households

Kinh

households

Ethnic minority households

Number %

Cam Thuy Town 31 9 22 71.0%

Cam Binh Commune 226 11 215 95.1%

Cam Thach Commune 100 5 95 95.0%

Cam Thanh Commune 135 20 115 85.2%

Total 492 45 447 90.9%


40. Suitable measures in the process of implementing DMS, RCS, SES and updating REMDP

are ensured to be suitable for cultural, environmental and vulnerable aspects. Besides

participants from district and representative of communal compensation council, head of

village and representatives of people are also invited to participate in the council. The




representatives of people are ethnic minority people who are trusted by people and

participated in (i) community consultation meeting, DMS, RCS and SES. Community

consultation meetings are organized in favourable locations for people.

41. Positive and negative impacts caused by the project and impact mitigation measures will

and have been carried out. Benefit channels are presented in the table below:

Table 17: Summary of impacts caused by the project

Impacts

Positive/

negative

(+/-)

Mitigation measures/ support channel

Land acquisition and

resettlement

-

Mitigation through implementation of REMDP

and updating of REMDP

Risk of HIV transmission and

human trafficking

-

Risk of HIV transmission and human trafficking

is high, human trafficking awareness of people

and prevention program (HTAPP) are

implemented through tasks assigned to CSC of

the project.

It is expected to implement in 2018.

Traffic safety due to increase

of speed of vehicle

participating in traffic

-

Mitigation measure is implemented through

combination of road safety in technical design

of the project, including measures for reducing

speed in residential area. A communication

program will be carried out through tasks

assigned to CSC of the project.

It is expected to implement in 2018.

Accessibility to services and

market +

Improved road condition will improve traffic

condition, especially in rainy season

Improvement of health

condition +

Reduce of dust and improvement of accessing

to health services

Improvement of economy +

Benefit of improving economic condition is

longer than expectation due to increasing traffic

flow, reducing transport cost and saving

travelling time.

Consultation, participation and

redressing of

complaint/grievance

+

Local community will be informed and

consulted about all aspects/impacts caused by

the project on them in suitable manner with

culture. Reputable persons should participate

in consultation.




3.5. Other Vulnerable Group

42. Vulnerable groups are individuals or distinct groups of people who might suffer

disproportionately or face the risk of being further marginalized by the effects of land

acquisition and resettlement. These groups include: (i) households headed by women with

dependents (ii) households with disabled persons (head or member of the family), (iii)

households falling under the current MOLISA benchmark poverty line, (iv) War invalids

and martyrs, (v) landless households, and (vi) non-integrated and vulnerable ethnic

minorities (having one or more than one ethnic minority member will be considered as

ethnic minority household).

43. Vulnerable households. Total of 492 affected households (2,267 persons) belongs to

vulnerable. Of which 423 households are purely Ethnic minority, 8 Poor households, 25

households of War invalids and martyrs and Social policy beneficiaries households, 11

households with Disabled people, 25 households with Female headed households;

44. Please note that out of 492 vulnerable households, 447 households belong to ethnic

minority group however 24 ethnic minority households are both ethnic minority and other

vulnerable criteria (2 households belong to poor households, 8 AHs belong to War invalids

and martyrs and social policy beneficiaries households, 6 AHs belong to with disabled

people households, and 8 AHs with female headed households) and 423 are purely ethnic

minority. And for the 45 affected households who belong to the Kinh ethnic group, 6 of

them belong to the poor households, 17 are War invalids and martyrs and social policy

households, 5 household has disabled household member, and 17 Female-headed

household with dependents.

Table 18: Comparisons on vulnerability between Ethnic Minority and Kinh Households

Vulnerable

Groups Total

FHH

with

depende

nts

Household

with

Disabled

HH

member

Social Policy

Households

Ethnic

Minority

Poor

Househ

old

War

invalids

and

martyrs

Social

policy

benefici

aries

Ethnic

Minority 447 8 6 5 3 423 2

Kinh

Household 45 17 5 14 3 0 6

Total AHs 492 25 11 19 6 423 8

No. of APs 2,267 80 43 88 36 1,990 30

(Source: August 2017 DMS & SES)



CONSULTATION AND INFORMATION DISCLOSURE P a g e | 4 1

D. CONSULTATION AND INFORMATION DISCLOSURE

4.1. Objectives of Consultation and Participation

45. Implementation of consultation with the affected HHs, affected organizations and

community will reduce the conflicts and minimize delay of the project. Base on this, it

enables the project to update the resettlement plan which is compliance with the needs,

benefit of the affected HHs and organizations.

46. The objectives of the public consultation and participation of local people include: (i)

ensuring the participation of the affected HHs, affected organizations and local community

into the progress of design, preparation and making decision of project; (ii) disseminating

all the information, activities related to the project to APs; (iii) collecting the idea, concern,

need or priority of affected people; (iv) ensuring that all the APs notified all the decision

which is related directly to their income and living standard; and (v) ensuring the

transparency in implementation of land acquisition, compensation and assistance

payment, and relocation.

4.2. Consultation and Disclosure during updating of REMDP.

47. TL-PMU under support of project consultant organized series meeting with Cam Thuy

DPC and affected households in the District from March 2016 to November 2017 and one

meeting on 3rd Fecbruary, 2018 for 18 relocation households in Cam Thuy town. In the

meeting, Cam Thuy DPC and affected households ware informed about the project and

the activities for updating REMDP; discussed about the plan and completed necessary

activities for updating of REMDP. Cam Thuy DPC, affected households and

organizations/unions participating in the meeting committed to actively support the project.

48. Information and community consultation were also conducted prior to conducting DMS

from 21 to 25 August, 2017 at meeting hall of communes/ town. In the meetings, the

following information was disseminated:

(i) land acquisition scope; (ii) potential impacts of the project; (iii) entitlement for

compensation, assistace and rehabiliation; (iv) implementation progress of the

project and DMS; (v) procedure for implementation of DMS and establishment of

compensation plan; (vi) option for publicizing DMS result and compensation plan; (vii)

participation of affected person and community; (viii) grievance redress mechanism;

(ix) guidance household for declaration

Resettlement activities and monitoring process;

Responsibility of agencies, including information on the agencies at all levels related

to site clearance process;

Necessary documents provided to affected person and community include: (i) The

PIB; and (ii) Compensation unit rate of PPC for lands, trees and structures; and (iii)

assistances and allowances to the affected households.

49. Households participating in the meeting expected that the project should be implemented

soon to facilitate in socio-economic development of locality. Households also agreed with

compensation policy of the project.




Table 19: Results of public consultations before DMS, RCS and SES activities with affected households and community

Date/Time/

Location

Type of

disseminated

information

Participant

(organization,

household)

Number of participants Questions Raised by the

Affected People

Discussion/Answers/Clarifications on issues

provided by TL-PMU/DCARB/Consultant (male) (female) EM

Time:

07h30’, 21 August,

2017

Location:

Meeting

hall of Cam

Thuy town

- Provide

information of

the project on

(i) Design of the

road sections;

(ii) Measures

taken to

minimize

negative

impacts; (iii)

project

implementation

progress;

- Grievance

redress

mechanism;

- The

necessary for

acquiring land

and regulations

of the project

compensation

TL-PMU/

DCARB/

Consultant

CPC and

unions

Head of

hamlet

Households

81 32 31

I. Cam Thuy town

1. When agricultural land is

partially acquired, the

remaining land area is not

large enough or difficult for

cultivation in the future, if the

affected households requested

to acquire remaining land area

or land parcel, the

compensation council will

acquire the remaining land

area and compensate for such

land area?

2. How to deal with situation

that head of household earns

living far from their hometown

at the time of conducting DMS

or compensation payment?

3. How to compensate for

some affected structures not

included in unit price of the

province?

II. Cam Binh commune

1. How are some trees and

structures not included in unit

price of Thanh Hoa PPC

compensated?

I. Cam Thuy town

1. When conducting DMS for site clearance,

compensation council considers each specific case

and then it is referred to compensation policy of the

project to inform if it needs to acquire entire land area

or does not need to acquire the remaining land area.

2. In case, land owner earns living far from his

hometown or he cannot come back home to conduct

DMS or receive compensation payment, he can

authorize his relative who is accepted by the law to

do for him.

3. During the DMS process, value will determine

specific land price of structures not included in unit

price of province and then submits the unit price to

province for appraisal. After being approved by

province, the unit price will be the base for applying

compensation unit price for the project.

II. Cam Binh commune

Consultant in charge of replacement cost survey will

check and survey on replacement cost for crop and

structure (included in unit price/not included in unit

price of province) at the time of compensation and

establish RCS report to submit to Cam Thuy’s DCARB. Cam Thuy DPC will submit replacement

cost to PPC for approval and appraisal to implement

compensation.

Time:

07h30’, 22-23

August,

2017

Location:

Meeting

hall of Cam

Binh

commune

and

Villages

259 62 142




Date/Time/

Location

Type of

disseminated

information

Participant

(organization,

household)

Number of participants Questions Raised by the

Affected People

Discussion/Answers/Clarifications on issues

provided by TL-PMU/DCARB/Consultant (male) (female) EM

Time:

07h30’, 24 August,

2017

Location:

Meeting

hall of Cam

Thanh

commune

- Provided

Update

Resettlement

booklet;

- DMS plan and

DMS form

apply for the

project;

- SES survey

and SES

informations

need to

provided from

AHs.

- Guidance

AHs to self

declar

- Collect social

economic

informations,

documents at

CPC and DPC.

TL-PMU/

DCARB/

Consultant

CPC and

unions

Head of

hamlet

Households

127 49 75

III. Cam Thach commune

1. How are affected assets on

land compensated and

assisted?

2. If there is

comment/complaint on land

acquisition and compensation

payment, how and who to

contact?

IV. Cam Thanh commune

1. Field land plot of my family

is mostly affected by the

project and the remaining land

area is not enough for

cultivation, if our family can

propose to acquire the

remaining land area of the land

plot?

2. During the construction

process, if it causes cracking

of wall or housing is too near to

the road that affects living of

people, who will be

responsible for the incident?

III. Cam Thach commune

1. Compensation unit price for structure will be based

on replacement cost at the time of compensation

which is approved by Thanh Hoa PPC.

2. Households can send complaint letter to officers of

village, commune or district compensation council. If

they are not satisfied with redressing method, they

can send complaint letter to provincial level and

finally to the court.

IV. Cam Thanh commune

1. During the process of implementing DMS,

compensation council will consider each specific

case. For case which is acquired remaining land

area, it must ensure requirement in accordance with

the project’s policy.

2. Existing condition of house and structures along

road section shall be surveyed and take photo before

the construction commencement. During the

construction process, if it affects housing or assets of

people, assessment of damage will be conducted

and resolution for handling the damage for

households should be provided timely to the

households. Vibration is inevitable during the

construction which is included in construction method

for contractors..

Time:

07h30’, 25 August,

2017

Location:

Meeting

hall of Cam

Thach

commune

123 25 65

Total 758 590 168 313





50. The second batch of meetings was organized with the affected households on the main

contents of the draft UREMDP. In the meetings, the following information were

disseminated:

Result of DMS;

Right and entitlement, including the process of determining households which are

eligible for being compensated; right and other entitlements of AP, including

entitlement for person who losses his business, income and job; being assisted in

income restoration; and, job opportunities related to the project.

Grievance redress mechanism and information on procedure for submission of

grievance dossier and grievance process.

The plan of implementing compensation and resettlement includes information on

proposed schedule of resettlement activities; ensure that households will be not

required to relocate until they fully receive compensation amount; and ensure that

construction activity of the project will be only started when all resettlement and site

clearance activities in the project area are completed.

51. Together with the public consultation meetings organized, the focused group discussions

and in-depth interviews were also carried out with the leaders of communes

representatives of mass organisations, residential group leaders and especially

representatives of AHs in the project communes. The content of focused group

discussions and in-depth interviews revolved around: (i) the opinions and concerns of

participants about compensation, assistance and relocation of the Project; (ii) impacts of

the Project on income and livelihoods of AHs; and (iii) how to ensure that the grievance

redress mechanism is effective in solving complaints and grievances of AHs.

Table 20: Preference of Likely Affected Households for Relocation and Compensation

Kind of affect Option Respondent

(HHs) %

Land loss compensation

Land for land 00 0%

Cash for land 653 93.6%

Not yet decided 45 6.4%

Relocation of structures

On own land in the village 447 63.8%

On new land in the village 165 23.5%

Commune land 89 12.7%


4.3. Disclosure Requirements

52. The Project Resettlement and Ethnic Minority Development Framework and the REMDP

for the road section have been uploaded in ADB website. The documents, together with

the most recently issued laws and regulations have been posted also in the headquarters

of the district, town, communes, and house of heads of villages. All affected households

and agencies got one copy delivered.




53. This UREMDP, once approved by Thanh Hoa PPC and ADB will be posted in public

places. This document will be made available in Vietnamese language, sent to Thanh Hoa

PPC, Cam Thuy DPCs, concerned towns and communes. The UREMDP will also be

posted on ADB’s website. 54. The resettlement monitoring reports conducted by the EMO engaged by TL-PMU will also

be posted in public places, sent to the communes and, relevant agencies and uploaded to

ADB’s websites.



GRIEVANCE REDRESS P a g e | 4 6

E. GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM

55. The grievance redress mechanism will follow the same mechanism under the ongoing

Project. Grievances related to any aspect of the Project will be handled through negotiation

aimed at achieving consensus. Complaints will pass through three stages before they

could be elevated to a court of law as a last resort. The DCARB will shoulder all

administrative and legal fees that might be incurred in the resolution of grievances and

complaints.

(i) First Stage, Commune People’s Committeeman aggrieved affected household may

bring his/her complaint before any member of the Commune People’s Committee, either through the Village Chief or directly to the CPC, in writing or verbally. It is

incumbent upon said member of CPC or the village chief to notify the CPC about the

complaint. The CPC will meet personally with the aggrieved affected household and will

have 30-45 days following the lodging of the complaint to resolve it. The CPC is

responsible for documenting and keeping file of all complaints that it handles.

Upon issuance of decision of CPC, the household can make an appeal within 30

days. If the second decision has been issued and the household is still not satisfied

with the decision, the household can elevate his/her complaint to the DPC.

(ii) Second Stage, District People’s Committee. Upon receipt of complaint from the

household, the DPC will have 30-45 days following the lodging of the complaint to

resolve the case. The DPC is responsible for documenting and keeping file of all

complaints that it handles.

Upon issuance of decision of DPC, the household can make an appeal within 30


with the decision, the household can elevate his/her complaint to the PPC.

(iii) Third Stage, Provincial People’s Committee. Upon receipt of complaint from the

household, the PPC will have 30-45 days following the lodging of the complaint to

resolve the case. The PPC is responsible for documenting and keeping file of all

complaints that reaches the same.

Upon issuance of decision of PPC, the household can make an appeal within 30


with the decision, the household can elevate his/her complaint to the court within 45

days. PPC will then deposit the compensation payment in an escrow account.

56. At any stage in the aforementioned grievance redress mechanism, the complainant may

have the option to elevate the complaint to administrative courts for litigation following the

rules of court. According to the regulations of the 2013 Land Law and the 2013 Law on

Grievances, the project can proceed without disruption while the case is being heard by the

court. If any party is dissatisfied with the ruling of the court, that party can elevate the case

to a higher court. The above mentioned grievance redress mechanism does not impede

access to the country’s jurisdiction or administrative remedies. 57. If efforts to resolve disputes using the grievance procedures remain unresolved or

unsatisfactory, complainants have the right to directly discuss their concerns or problems



GRIEVANCE REDRESS P a g e | 4 7

with ADB Vietnam Resident Mission (VRM - 3rd Floor, No.16, Phan Chu Trinh Street, Hoan

Kiem District, Hanoi, Tel: 024.933.1374). If APs are still not satisfied with the responses of

the VRM, they can directly contact the ADB Office of the Special Project Facilitator5. The

Office of the Special Project Facilitator procedure can proceed based on the Accountability

Mechanism in parallel with the project implementation.

58. All costs involved in resolving the complaints (e.g. meetings, consultations, communication

and reporting/information dissemination) of the grievance redress committees as well as all

court litigation will be borne by the Project.

5 Complainants can send their concerns to the Office of the Special Project Facilitator using the

information at: https://www.adb.org/site/accountability-mechanism/main

https://www.adb.org/site/accountability-mechanism/main



POLICY AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR RESETTLEMENT P a g e | 4 8

F. POLICY AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR RESETTLEMENT

6.1. Government Laws and Regulations

59. The legal and policy framework for compensation, resettlement and rehabilitation under

the project is defined by the relevant laws and regulations of the Government of Viet Nam

(GoV) and the ADB policies. In case of discrepancies between the Borrower’s laws, regulations, and procedures and ADB's policies and requirements, ADB's policies and

requirements will prevail, consistent with Decree No. 16/2016/ND-CP dated 16th March,

2016 of the GoV on management and use of ODA fund and preferential funds of foreign

donors. The same statement was mentioned in the Decree 47/2014/ND-CP dated 15th

May, 2014 of the GoV on compensation and resettlement when the Government takes

over the land for the defense, security purposes, benefits of nation and public works as

well as for economic development.

60. The policies of GoV on compensation, resettlement and assistance have been

significantly improved from time to time, especially, 2013, the date of Land Law was

passed by the National Assembly. Many Laws, Decrees, Circulars and amendments to

Laws; Decrees issued by the GoV to improve the policies on land recovery, compensation

and assistance. The policies on land recovery, compensation and assistance have also

significant improved on the requirements of consultation, participation, information

dissemination, monitoring and evaluation. For the projects which financed by the

international financing institutions, the GoV has also approved for the required waivers to

meet with the international standards on involuntary resettlement.

61. The Constitution of the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam (2013) confirms the right of citizens

to own and protect the ownership of a house. In addition, the Government has enacted a

number of laws, decrees and regulations that constitute the legal framework for land

recovery, compensation and resettlement.

62. The principal documents include the Land Law 2013, No. 45/2013/QH13 takes effect on

01st July 2014, providing Viet Nam with a comprehensive land administration law, and the

guidelines are as follows: (1) Decree No. 43/2014/ND-CP dated 15th May, 2014 of the

GoV on detailing a number of articles of the Land Law No 45/2013/QH13; (2) Decree No.

44/2014/ND-CP dated 15th May, 2014 of the GoV on land prices; (3) Decree No.

45/2014/ND-CP dated 15th May, 2014 of GoV on collection of land use levies; (4) Decree

No. 46/2014/ND-CP dated 15th May, 2014 of the GoV on collection of land rent and water

surface rental; (5) Decree No. 47/2014/ND-CP dated 15th May, 2014 of the GoV on

compensation, support and resettlement upon land recovery by the State; (6) Decree

No.102/2014/ND-CP dated 10th November, 2014 of the GoV on sanctioning of

administrative violations in the field of land; (7) Decree No. 99/2015/ND-CP dated 20th

October, 2015 of the GoV on guidelines for implementation of a number of articles of the

Law on Housing; (8) Decree No. 01/2017/ND-CP dated 06th January, 2017 of the GoV on

amendment and supplement of a number of Articles of the Decree detailing regulations on

implementation of the Land Law; (9) Circular No. 30/2014/TT-BTNMT dated 02nd June,

2014 of the MONRE regulating profiles for land allocation, land lease, land use purpose

transfer, and land acquisition; (10) Circular No.36/2014/TT-BTNMT dated 30th June, 2014

of MONRE on land pricing method; compilation of and adjustment to land price lists;




determination of specific land prices and consultancy on land pricing; (11) Circular

No.37/2014/TT-BTNMT of MONRE dated 30th June, 2014 on compensation, support and

resettlement upon land recovery by the State; (12) Circular No. 332/2016/TT-BTC dated

26th December, 2016 on amendment and supplement of a number of articles of Circular

No. 76/2014/TT-BTC dated 16th June, 2014 of the Ministry of Finance on guidelines for

implementing Decree No. 45/2014/ND-CP on collection of land use levy.

63. Other laws, decrees and regulations relevant to land management, land recovery and

resettlement include: (1) the Construction Law 50/2014/QH13 dated 16th June, 2014 on

construction activities, rights and obligations of organizations and individuals to invest in

construction and building activities; (2) Law on Public Investment No. 49/2014/QH13 takes

effect on January 01st, 2015; (3) Ordinance No. 34/2007/PL-UBTVQH11 20th April, 2007

exercise of democracy in communes, wards and towns; (4) Decree No. 46/2015/ND-CP

dated 12th May, 2015 of the GoV on quality management of construction works; (5) Decree

59/2015/ND-CP dated June 18th, 2015 of the GoV on management of construction

investment projects; (6) Decree No.126/2014/ND-CP dated 31st December, 2014 of the

GoV on marriage and family law implementation, stipulating that all documents registering

family assets and land use rights must be in the names of both husband and wife; (7)

Decree No. 11/2010/ND-CP dated 24th February, 2010 of the GoV prescribing the

management and protection of road infrastructure; (8) Decree No. 100/2013/ND-CP dated

03rd September, 2013 of the GoV on amendment and supplement of a number of Articles

of Decree No. 11/2010/ND-CP dated 24th February, 2010 of the GoV; (9) Decree No.

16/2016/ND-CP dated 16th March, 2016 of the GoV and Circular No. 12/2006/TT-BKHDT

dated August 08, 2016 of the Ministry of Planning and Investment on management and

use of ODA fund and preferential funds of foreign donors; (10) Decree No.

136/2015/ND-CP dated December 31, 2015 of the GoV on guidelines for implementation

of a number of Articles of the Law on Public Investment; (11) Decision No.

63/2015/QD-TTg of the Prime Minister dated 10th December, 2015 regulating policies on

assistance in vocational training and job search for workers whose land is acquired; (12)

Decision No.1956/2009/QD-TTg of Prime Minister dated 17th November, 2009 on approval

of project on “Vocational training for rural labors by the year 2020”; (13) Decision No.

52/2012/QĐ-TTg of Prime Minister dated 16th November, 2012 regarding the policy for

supporting employment and training for employees who lose their agricultural land.

64. Laws, decrees and decisions relevant to public disclosure of information include Land Law,

No. 45/2013/QH13, Article 67, requiring disclosure of information to affected people prior

to recovery of agricultural and non-agricultural land of, respectively, 90 and 180 days

minimum. Document related to grievance and grievance redress mechanism: (1)

Complaints Law 02/2011/QH13 dated 11th November, 2011; Decree No. 75/2012/ND-CP

dated 03rd October, 2012 of the GoV on specific provisions a number of articles of the

Complaints Law. (2) Denunciation Law 03/2011/QH13 dated 11th November, 2011; Decree

No. 76/2012/ND-CP dated 03rd October, 2012 of the GoV on specific provisions a number

of articles of the Denunciation Law.




6.2. ADB Safeguard Policy Statement

65. On 20th July 2009, the ADB Board of Directors approved Safeguard Policy Statement

(SPS) that strengthens protections already in place on environment, involuntary

resettlement and indigenous peoples. The SPS and Operational Manual became effective

on 20th January 2010. The objectives of ADB Policy on Involuntary Resettlement

(Safeguard Requirement 2) are to avoid resettlement wherever possible, to minimize

involuntary resettlement by exploring project and design alternatives, to enhance, or at

least restore, the livelihoods of all affected persons in real terms relative to pre-project

levels; and to improve the standards of living of the displaced poor and other vulnerable

groups.

66. The ADB’s Policy on Indigenous Peoples (Safeguard Requirement 3) with the objective is

to design and implement projects in a way that fosters full respect for Indigenous Peoples’ identity, dignity, human rights, livelihood systems, and cultural uniqueness as defined by

the Indigenous People themselves so that they (i) receive cultural appropriate social and

economic benefits; (ii) do not suffer adverse impacts as a results of projects; and (iii) can

participate actively in project that affect them. It defines “indigenous peoples” as “those with a social or cultural identity distinct from the dominant or mainstream society”. "Indigenous peoples" is a generic concept that includes cultural minorities, ethnic minorities,

indigenous cultural communities, tribal people, natives, and aboriginals. The Policy

recognizes the potential vulnerability of ethnic minorities in the development process; that

ethnic minorities must be afforded opportunities to participate in and benefit from

development equally with other segments of society; and, have a role and be able to

participate in the design of development interventions that affect them.

67. The policy on indigenous peoples is “designed to promote the participation of indigenous peoples in project preparation and implementation, to ensure that they benefit from

development interventions that would affect them, and to provide effective safeguards

against any adverse impacts”. In any ADB interventions, the approaches to be used are as follows: (i) to achieve the greatest possible reduction of poverty among the affected

indigenous peoples; (ii) when negative impacts are unavoidable, they should be minimized

as much as possible, and appropriate measures will be taken to mitigate the adverse

impacts; (iii) in enhancing the benefits of a development intervention for indigenous

peoples or reducing negative impacts of a development intervention, clear mechanisms for

accurate and objective analysis of their circumstances will be prepared; and (iv) the

mechanisms for any intervention must be transparent and should ensure accountability.

6.3. Gap Analysis and Gap-Filling Measures

68. With the issuance of Decree 47/2014 dated 15th May, 2014 of the GoV regulating on

compensation, assistance and resettlement when land is recovered by the State in

replacement of Decree 197/2004/ND/CP (dated 3rd December, 2004), the policies the

Government have been significantly improved time to time and become more consistent

with ADB’s social safeguards policies. Nonetheless, provisions and principles adopted in this REMDP will supersede the provisions of the relevant decrees currently in force in Viet

Nam wherever a gap exists, as provided for under Decree No. 16/2016/ND-CP dated 16th

March, 2016 of the GoV and Circular No. 12/2006/TT-BKHDT dated 8th August, 2016 of




the Ministry of Planning and Investment on management and use of ODA fund and

preferential funds of foreign donors.

69. There is basic congruence between Viet Nam’s laws and ADB’s resettlement policy

especially with regard to the entitlement of persons with legal rights/titles. Existing

legislation provide guidance in (i) determining market/replacement rates and payment of

compensation for various types of affected assets; (ii) options for land-for-land and cash

compensation; (iii) provision of relocation assistance and support to displaced households

during the transition; (iv) provision of resettlement land and housing with secured tenure;

(v) additional assistance for severely affected and vulnerable households; (vi) support to

livelihood restoration and training; and (vii) notification/disclosure, consultation, and

grievance mechanisms.

70. However, ADB Policy does not consider the absence of legal rights of displaced persons

on the acquired land as an impediment to receiving compensation for other assets and for

rehabilitation assistance. Non-registration of shops/business also does not bar

shop/business owners from being assisted in restoring their business. There is also a

slight difference in the definition of major/severe impacts. Key differences between ADB

Resettlement Policy and Viet Nam’s legislation, including measures to address the differences, are outlined in table below.

Table 21: Gap Analysis and Gap-Filling Measures

Key Issues National Laws ADB Policy Project Policy

Definition of

severely

affected

households

Decree 47/2014

regulating on

compensation,

assistance and

resettlement when land is

recovered by the State

regulates that severely

affected households are

those who lose 30% or

more of their productive

land.

Severely affected

households are those

who will be physically

displaced or will lose

10% or more of their

productive, income

generating assets.

Affected persons who

lose 10% or more of

productive land, income

generating assets or

physically displaced will

be considered as severely

affected households.

Non-titled

users

Article 7, Article 251,

Decree 47/2014/ND-CP,

the Peoples’ Committees of the provinces or

centrally-run cities shall

consider providing such

support on case-by-case

basis.

Non-titled affected

persons, including

displaced tenants,

sharecroppers and

squatters, are not

entitled to

compensation for land

but are entitled to

payment for non-land

assets and assistance

and provided with

Non-titled affected users

will be entitled to

compensation for

non-land assets and

provided appropriate

assistance to help them

improve, if not restore,

their socio-economic

status.




Key Issues National Laws ADB Policy Project Policy

relevant transitional

assistance and support

to restore their

pre-project living

standards. If they are

poor and vulnerable,

appropriate assistance

must be provided to

help them improve their

socio-economic status.

Unregistered

businesses

Compensate and support

only registered

manufacturing and

business enterprise or

households

Promptly compensate

all economically

displaced persons for

the loss of income or

livelihood sources at

full replacement cost,

and assist through

credit facilities, training

and employment

opportunities

Assist affected

persons/households who

do not fall under

registered business by

providing assistance in

cash or in-kind during

transition period.

Houses and

structures

Article 89 of Land Law

2013 - Compensation

equal to the value of

newly constructed

houses and structures

following the same

technical standard.

Structure to be

compensated 100% of

replacement cost,

without depreciation

and regardless of

status of the AP on the

land as long as

structure was

established prior to the

cut-off date

Houses and other

structures on land that

were constructed prior to

the cut-off datewill be

compensated according

to (i) new construction

price, (ii) no depreciation,

and (iii) APs can use the

salvages.

Entity that

conducts the

valuation of

acquired

assets

The provincial-level land

administration agency is

entitled to hire

organizations having

consultancy functions for

advising on the

determination of specific

land prices

Qualified and

experienced experts

will undertake the

valuation of acquired

assets

Qualified organization has

been engaged to conduct

replacement cost surveys

for the project which will

be used as input by the

DCARB under the District

People’s Committee for determining

compensation amounts.



ENTITLEMENTS, ASSISTANCE AND BENEFITS P a g e | 5 3

G. ENTITLEMENTS, ASSISTANCE AND BENEFITS

7.1. Eligibility

71. Eligibility for compensation and assistance of the Project is based on the cut-off date. The

cut-off-date means the date prior to which the occupation or use of any part of the project

area makes residents land users or co-users of the same eligible to be recognized as

affected households.

72. The cut-off date for eligibility to compensation, assistance and resettlement for affected

households for the road section was 26th August, 2016 when Cam Thuy District People's

Committee issued Official letter No. 69/UBND-TNMT for the notice of Land Acquisition and

sent it to each affected household and all affected households. The Notice of Land

Acquisition has been posted in the headquarters of the town and communes, the village

meeting offices and the house of the village leaders, and other easy accessible places.

73. The affected persons has been informed of the cut-off date, and any people who settle in

the Project area after the cut-off date will not be entitled to compensation and/or

assistance under the Project. The principle and definition of cut-off date were discussed in

the consultation meetings with affected households and communities and reflected in the

PIB that delivered to all meeting participants.

7.2. Entitlements

74. Project entitlement on specific impacts caused by the project and equivalent entitlement

for affected person at Cam Thuy District section (from Km 59+900 to Km 76+800) are

presented in the table 22 below.




Table 22: Entitlement Matrix on Compensation and Support

Impact/ Loss and Application(*) Eligible Persons Entitlements

Lost of Agriculture land

Marginal* Loss of Productive

Land

(Agriculture/ Aquaculture/

Garden)

*Single affected plot: The

remaining area is still

economically viable for use or

meets the expected personal

yield, and within the minimum

land quota in the commune.

*More than One Plot of

Productive Land. If land is

affected by more than 10% of

productive land but have more

than one plot of productive land

and remaining area of total

landholdings is still economically

viable for use, meets the

expected personal yield, and

within the minimum land quota in

the commune

Households or persons with

(i) LURC; or (ii) in the process of

acquiring LURC (iii) are eligible to

acquire LURC according to the

regulations of GoV; and (iv) covered

by customary rights, such as members

of ethnic minority groups.

381 AHs

Cash compensation at replacement cost which is equivalent to current

market price and free from transaction costs (e.g., taxes, certification,

and administration costs).

Cash assistance equivalent to 1.5 times of the current market price of

agricultural land to cover for career change and job generation.

Land Users who have no formal legal

rights nor recognized or recognizable

claims to such land.

0 AHs

No compensation for public land and land allocated by GoV/ local

authorities to institutions or individuals, no compensation for the land of

the land users who have no formal legal rights nor recognized or

recorgnizable claims to such land but full replacement cost for non-land

assets and investment on land established before cut-off date to land

user.

Severe* Loss of Productive

Land

(Agriculture/ Aquaculture/











Garden)

*Single or More than One Plot

of Land. The remaining area is

not economically viable for use or

does not meet the expected

personal yield or below the

minimum land quota in the

commune.





44 AHs

Provision of life stabilization assistance for affected persons:

a) Losing from 10% to less than 30% of total agricultural land holding

30 kg of rice (12,000VND/kg) per person per month for all members

of the household for 6 months if not relocating


of the household for 12 months if relocating

b) Losing from 30% to 70% of total agricultural land holding.






of the household for 24 months if relocating to a difficult

socio-economic condition area.

c) Losing more than 70% of total agricultural land holding






of the household for 36 months if relocating to a difficult

socio-economic condition area.

Bonus if land is handed over in time (800,000 VND with household lost

from 1,000m2 agricultural land, and 500,000 VND with household lost

less than 1,000m2 agricultural land)





Cash assistance equivalent to 1.5 times of the current market price of

agricultural land to cover for career change and job generation.

Lost of Residential Land

Partial* Loss of Residential

Land

*Will not Require Relocation








389AHs




Bonus if land is handed over in time (500,000 VND/ AHs)

Land Users who have no formal legal

rights nor recognized or recognizable

claims to such land.

0 AHs

No compensation for public land and land allocated by GoV/ local

authorities to institutions or individuals, no compensation for the land of

the land user who have no formal legal rights nor recognized and

unrecognizable claims to such land but full replacement cost for

non-land assets and investment on land established before cut-off date

to land user

Total Loss of Residential Land

Land no longer viable for

continued use, i.e., can no longer

build a house, therefore the entire

property has to be acquired








28 AHs



administration costs), plus cash assistance for self-relocation equivalent

to investment cost per household at the resettlement site (52.000.000

VND/AHs)

Bonus if land is handed over in time (1.000,000 VND/ AHs)





Loss of Garden/ Pond Land that

cannot be Certified/

Recognized as Residential

Land

Households or persons







40 AHs

In addition to payment for affected land based on replacement cost of

garden/pond land, AP will be entitled to cash assistance equivalent to

50% of the current market value of residential land.

Partially impact on houses or

House-cum-shops

Unaffected portion of the house

is still viable or can be

continuously used and will not

require any relocation, only

repair works

Owners with or without acceptable

proof of land use rights over the land;

with or without building permit

168AHs

Cash compensation at replacement cost for the affected portion which is

equivalent to the current market value of a newly built structure and with

no depreciation or deduction for salvageable materials for the affected

portion

Total* impact on houses or

House-cum-shops

*House is partially affected but

the remaining portion of the

house will no longer be viable

for continuously used therefore

the entire house should be

destroyed.

Owners with or without acceptable

proof of land use rights over the land;

with or without building permit

67 AHs

Cash compensation at replacement cost for the affected portion which is

equivalent to the current market value of a newly built structure and with

no depreciation or deduction for salvageable materials for the affected

portion.

Cash payment for connection fees for water, electricity and telephone at

the new site (relocation site or site that AP prefer)

Loss of Income from Business Registered business

0 AH

Cash assistance equivalent to 30% of after tax income in one year

based on average income in the last 3 consecutive years as certified by

the tax department of the province





Non-registered business (shops)

12 AHs

Cash assistance based on estimated net income of shop (Net income

will be based on the average monthly income indicated in the tax

receipts) is 3,500,000 VND/ month

Nevertheless, assistance will not be less than equivalent to 3 months

minimum wage

Disruption During Relocation Relocating households whose house

are totally affected and will have to

move to new plot of land or move back

on remaining land

28 AHs relocation

39 AHs move back on their

remaining residential land

(i) Life stabilization allowance in cash equivalent to 30 kg

(12,000VND/kg) of rice per member per month for all member of the

household for 3 month;

(ii) 5,000,000 VND/ AH for Materials Transport Allowance which will be

equivalent to the actual cost of moving (vehicle and labor), and

(iii) 1,000,000 VND/AH/month in 6 montn for House Rental Allowance if

AP has no other accommodation while waiting for new accommodation

(i.e., while AP is rebuilding house or waiting for house being built by a

contractor at the resettlement site).

Relocating Shops

12 AHs

Materials Transport Allowance which will be equivalent to the actual cost

of moving (vehicle and labor).

Higher Risks of

Impoverishment/ Hardship Due

to Loss of Resource Base

Affected vulnerable households

492 AHs

Allowances for households as per government regulation (social policy

households, heroic mothers, wounded, dead soldiers)

Additional support 1.000.000 VND per vulnerable households

Households who will experience

severe loss of production land,

relocating households and business

owners, and vulnerable households

Entitled to take part in income restoration program/measures.





528 AHs (includes 492 Vulnerable AH;

and 36 SAH6 )

Loss of Secondary Structures Households or persons with or without

acceptable proof of land use rights

over the land; with or without building

permit.

902 AHs

Cash compensation at replacement cost which is equivalent to the

current market value of a newly built structure and with no depreciation

or deduction for salvageable materials.

Impacts on Trees and

Aquaculture Products

Owners regardless of tenure status

787 AHs affected on fruit trees

699 AHs affected on timber trees

457 AHs affected on crops

Annual crops and aquaculture products equivalent to current market

value of crops/aquaculture products at the time of compensation;

For perennial crops trees, cash compensation at replacement cost

equivalent to current market value given the type, age and productive

value (future production) at the time of compensation.

Timber trees based on diameter at breast height at current market

value.

Impacts on Public Facilities,

Communal Owned Assets and

Collective Assets

Owners of assets

06 communities Cash compensation to cover the cost of restoring the facilities or assets

OR

Impacts on State office Thanh Hoa Power company, water

company and Cam Thuy DPC

In-kind compensation (such as DCARB to replace materials, provide

labor)

Unanticipated involuntary

resettlement impacts

Eligible affected persons. Entitlements will be prepared in accordance with the ADB Safeguard

Policy Statement and applicable national laws and regulations.

6 Among 71 SAHs, 35 SAHs belong to vulnerable group



RELOCATION P a g e | 6 0

H. RELOCATION ARRANGGEMENT 75. Out of 28 relocation households 10 households in Cam Binh, Cam Thach, and Cam Thanh

commune have registered for self-relocation in DMS minute, and 18 household in Cam

Thuy town, they all agree to registered for self-relocation in the consultation meeting on 3rd

February, 2018.

76. There are 28 relocation households, and all the the households have sent letter to DCARB

requesting for receiving cash for their self-relocation. Relocation households will get

compensations for affected land and assets by replacement cost. In additional, the

relocation households will receive other assistances in cash including (i) life stabilization

allowance that equivalents to 30 kg of rice (12.000 VND/kg) per member of household for

all members of the family for 3 months if they are pure relocation households and not

combined with other severe impacts, (ii) materials transport allowance (5.000.000

VND/AH) which will be equivalent to the actual cost of moving (vehicle and labor) assets to

the new place, and (iii) house rental allowance (VND 1.000.000/month for 6 months);

77. Furthermore, the relocated household will receive additional VND 52.000.000 for

self-relocation assistance. After this UREMDP has been accepted by ADB, cash payment

will be made to the relocation households (one-time payment) for their self-relocation.

78. For 40 households who have to re-build their house on the remaining land area, affected

assets will be compensated at replacement cost and assistance in cash. In additional,

affected people will receive other assistances in cash including (i) life stabilization

allowance that equivalents to 30 kg of rice (12.000 VND/kg) per member of household for

all members of the family for 3 month, (ii) materials transport allowance (5.000.000

VND/AH) which will be equivalent to the actual cost of moving (vehicle and labor) assets to

the new place, and (iii) house rental allowance (VND 1.000.000/month for 6 months);



INCOME RESTORATION AND REHABILITATION P a g e | 6 1

I. INCOME RESTORATION AND REHABILITATION

9.1. Detailed Need Assessment on Income Restoration Measures

79. A Detailed Need Assessment (DNA) was conducted in August 2017 by the Social

Safeguard Consultant together with representatives of affected households, local

authorities and the DCARB. Four Focus Group Discussion (FGD) with severely affected

households, and vulnerable affected households, and Three key informant interviews with

income restoration program (IRP) eligible households and local authorities were

carried-out. In addition, survey on livelihood preferences of all AHs by questionnaire was

also conducted.

80. Requests for support by the IRP eligible households during the DNA included:

i. Be provided technical assistance and credit support to develop model of growing

rice combining with fishing;

ii. Be prioritized to receive loan with preferential interest rates from Bank for Poverty

Reduction or the Agriculture and Rural Development Bank for development of

production activities;

iii. Be trained and supported to be connect with reputable enterprises for labor export;

iv. Be included in occupational trainings for family members for occupations such as

welding, electronics, electricity and motorcycle repairs. After training courses the

household would apply to work in companies or open small repairing shop in their

house.

v. Members of affected households who are under 30 years old wish to be facilitated in

training on occupational skills and to support in looking for jobs in district, province or

labor export.

81. Result of DNA also shows that out of the total 528 affected households, 148 households

wish to development of their small business and 71 households opted to develop livestock or

combination of livestock and cultivation and receive technical supports as well as loan

support to raise cattle and chicken. Together with the need of livestock development,

severely affected households also proposed to be trained and guided on technique of

growing rice, especially severely affected households with remaining land is enough for

cultivation. There are 78 households who have the need of occupational training for their

children and 83 households that expect that their children who have graduated from

university will be introduced on job opportunities. The remaining 97 households want to

access to preferential loan to develop economy of their family. IRP preferences of the IRP

participating households are summarized in the Table below:




Table 23: IRP preferences of IRP eligible households

Occupation Cam Thuy

Town Cam Binh Commune

Cam Thach Commune

Cam Thanh Commune

Total

Cultivation 0 0 0 0 0

Livestock 2 11 24 14 51

Cultivation and livestock 3 36 14 18 71

Development of small business

20 62 21 45 148

Occupational training 6 34 12 26 78

Introduction of job opportunities

4 38 18 23 83

Access to preferential loan 13 47 13 24 97

Total 48 228 102 150 528

(Source: DMS & SES October, 2017)

9.2. Income Restoration Activities

82. According to the results of DNA, the following activities will be implemented:

i. Cash Assistance for Vulnerable Households: vulnerable households will receive

additional cash assistance by VND 1,000,000/HH.

ii. Assistance Severely Affected Households: The household losing from 10% and

more of their total production land holding land and/or relocating household will get

additional assistances. includes assistance for stabilizing households’ life equivalent to 30 kg of rice/household’s member/month for all family members, minimum in three

months and maximum in 36 months (it depends on the level of land acquisition

impacts), and other assistance will be also provided to severely affected households

as follows:

iii. Agriculture extension with sustainable production technique to improve current

cultivation capacity will be provided to households through programs of the

Government and through guidance of agriculture extension staffs of commune and

district;

iv. Prioritized to access to agricultural credit;

v. Technical assistance and support in accessing to credit for starting business or other

economic activities; through the National Fund for Employment Support of MOLISA,

Agriculture and Rural Development Bank, Policy Bank for the Poor.

vi. Being prioritized in recruitment of labors for construction of subproject (see below).

83. In addition to the above, in-kind support will be specially paid attention to severely AHs

who lose their productive land, buy new land or look for non-farm jobs. However, each

severely affected household is entitled to receive only one economic recovery allowance

package at different assistance levels which depends on whether they lose their house or

lose more than 10% of their land holding. The details income restoration program will be

developed in details in first quarter 2018.




84. In-kind support will include supply of breeding/seedling, veterinary materials, and fertilizers

to households who want to receive in-kind support to develop their livestock and

cultivation activities. In-kind support can be either full scholarships or a certain percentage

to provide occupational training for severely affected AHs who want to change their jobs.

In the process of developing a detailed livelihood program by Livelihood Restoration Board

of District, severely AHs will be provided the guidance on how to use in-kind support to get

the most effectiveness that corresponds to the level they are entitled to receive.

85. It is allowed if the household opts to receive assistance in cash, to restore livelihood by

themselves, however the guidance how to use money effectively shall be provided to

households, especially poor households before they receive money for livelihood

restoration on the base of approved budget of the project, the need and impact level of

households as a sustainable method to restore livelihood.

86. Besides allowance in cash for job changing and creation as regulated in entitlement matrix,

the project will facilitate one member of severely affected household in registering to

participating in occupational training center of the province basing on the result of survey

on the need of livelihood restoration of households. Through consultation with Division of

Labor, Invalids and Social Affairs of District, fund for occupational training will be applied in

accordance with the Plan of Decision No.1956/2009/QD-TTg dated 17th November, 2009

by Prime minister allocated to districts and provinces.

87. Support in accessing to loans: DPC, CPC/Town’s PC cooperate with DCARB to establish a list of severely affected households and the households are prioritized to access to

preferential loans from Policy Bank for poor household, loan with low interest rate from

Agriculture and Rural Development Bank to develop their cultivation, livestock or

agriculture services. The Banks will be responsible for approving borrowing purpose of

households and will divide the loan ceiling, interest and loan duration. Households must

complete loan procedures in accordance with requirement of the Banks. Policy on fund

assistance for affected households will be implemented in accordance with regulations in

Decision No. 52/2012/QD-TTg of Prime Minister dated 16th November, 2012 regarding the

policy for supporting employment and training for employees who lose their agricultural

land.

88. Introduction of job and labor export opportunities: DPC/CPC/Town’s PC will introduce job opportunities from enterprises/companies in the territory of district, commune and town for

members of affected households who want to have job which is suitable for knowledge

that their children have learnt from university or members of severely affected households

are prioritized in participating in recruitment programs of enterprises outside the province.

DPC, CPC/Town’s PC will give a priority for members of severely affected households who have aspiration to work oversee. Policy on introducing labor export opportunity for affected

person will be implemented in accordance with regulations in Decision No.

52/2012/QD-TTg of Prime Minister dated 16th November, 2012 regarding the policy for

supporting employment and training for employees who lose their agricultural land..

89. Prioritize to employ members of severely affected households when Contractor needs to

recruit local labors for site clearance, excavation and other construction activities for the

works of constructing road section in Cam Thuy District. Bidding document and conditions




in the contract for civil works regulate that when recruiting local labors, construction

contractors and labor contractors will:

i. Prioritize in recruiting qualified labors and especially severely affected persons;

ii. Pay salary for labors in compliance with regulation of law; and

iii. Do not use children labor.

90. Livelihood Restoration Board of District will contact with contractors to organize

recruitment in locality in accordance with regulation in bidding document. Schedule and

requirement on minimum skill will be planned. Information on job opportunities will be

disseminated to villages in order for people to easily access. Severely affected women

need to be specially paid attention in consultation meetings and assistance programs as

mentioned above. In addition, severely affected women should be also specially paid

attention in priority of recruitment equality in the construction process.

91. Feasibility activities of livelihood restoration for severely affected households mentioned

above are summarized in the Table below:

Table 24: Proposed activities to improve and restore income

Main aspiration of severely

affected households Proposed activities

Development of agriculture

production

- Support in agriculture production technique

- In-kind support

- Support in accessing to preferential loans with low

interest rate

- Prioritize to change land for households which have

aspiration of changing agriculture land

- In case, public land fund of commune is not much, it

should be prioritiezed for households which have larger

proportion of losing production land to rent public land

of commune for cultivation.

Development of agriculture

service

- Support in accessing to preferential loans with low

interest rate Organize study tour to learn model

Occupational training and job

changing

- Coordinate with occupational training schools to

organize training for members of severely affected

households which have aspiration of being participated

in occupational training courses. Members of severely

affected households will receive in-kind support which

is full scholarship or a part of scholarship equivalent to

in-kind support level that households are entitled to

receive.

Introduction of job opportunities - Prioritize to introduce job opportunities which are

suitable for knowledge and skill of affected persons

from enterprises inside or outside the province when




Main aspiration of severely

affected households Proposed activities

they have the need of recruitment.

- Give priority for children of severely affected

households to participate in programs of labor export of

province or district

- Prioritize to recruit unskilled labor from severely

affected households to work in construction packages

of the project.

9.3. Implementation arrangement and monitoring of livelihood restoration program for

severely affected households

92. Detailed livelihood restoration program will be managed and implemented by the

stakeholders with the roles as follows:

TL-PMU will be responsible for: (i) cooperating with Thanh Hoa PPC and related

departments to manage implementation progress of livelihood restoration program

of the project and preparing reports to ADB; (ii) cooperating with Cam Thuy DCARB

and implementation board of livelihood restoration program of district to carry out

livelihood restoration program; (iii) ensure that fund is available in bank account to

implement livelihood restoration program.

Board in charge of implementing livelihood restoration program at district

level: which is established by DPCs, will be responsible for implementing IRP with

but not limit to following responsibilities: (i) developing livelihood restoration program

in details and then submitting the program to TL-PMU for reviewing before

submitting to DPC for approval; (ii) following up the detailed implementation plan of

approved livelihood restoration program; (iii) providing necessary documents to

TL-PMU to timely allocate fund for livelihood restoration activities; (iv) closely

working with local authority at levels (DPC, CPC), organizations/unions(Women

union, farmer association) to find out resolutions for arising issues during the

process of implementing livelihood restoration program; (v) preparing reports on

implementation progress of livelihood restoration program to submit to TL- PMU and

Cam Thuy DPC.

Members of Board in charge of implementing livelihood restoration program at

district level include deputy chairman of DPC being in charge of development of

agriculture, representative of TL-PMU (one person), Division of Labor, Invalids and

Social Affairs (one person), head and cadastral officers of District Agriculture

Extension Station, representative of farmer association (one person) and Women

Union at district level (one person) Deputy chairman of DPC will be the head of

Board in charge of implementing livelihood restoration program.

External monitoring consultant: will externally monitor and assess the

implementation of livelihood restoration program, reflect arising issues in restoring

livelihood of severely affected households in periodical monitoring reports and give

recommendations or adjustment for livelihood restoration program if necessary.




The effectiveness of resolutions in livelihood restoration program will be assessed in

independent monitoring program and will be implemented during the process of

implementing the project.

93. The cost estimate for income restoration implementation is presented in Table below.

Table 25: Cost estimate for income restoration programe

Occupation Quantity Unit cost Amount

Cultivation 0 10,000,000 0

Livestock 51 10,000,000 510,000,000

Cultivation and livestock 71 10,000,000 710,000,000

Development of small business 148 10,000,000 1,480,000,000

Occupational training 78 10,000,000 780,000,000

Introduction of job opportunities 83 10,000,000 830,000,000

Access to preferential loan 97 10,000,000 970,000,000

Total 528 5,280,000,000

9.4. Implementation plan

94. The income restoration programs will be implemented in the period from the second

quarter of 2018 to the end of second quarter of 2019 and proposed as in Table 26 below.

Table 26: Implementation schedule

Main activities Time-frame

Develop in details the IRP (specific models/activity for

Income restoration) From 15 March to 15 May, 2018

Prepare TOR for selection of providers From 15 April to 15 May 2018

Prepare detail cost estimated for livelihood models and get

approval from competent authority From 15 April to 15 May 2018

Award contract and mobilize providers From May 2018

Implementation of detailed IRP From May 2018 to May 2019

Monitoring and evaluation. From May 2018 to May 2019



RESETTLEMENT AND FINANCING PLAN P a g e | 6 7

J. RESETTLEMENT AND FINANCING PLAN

10.1. Study of replacement cost

95. The compensation and assistance for land acquisition and resettlement in project,

especially Cam Thuy section, will be implemented in accordance with principle of

replacement cost. According to definition, replacement cost is the amount calculated prior

to relocation which is necessary to replace affected asset without deduction of tax, and/or

transaction cost as follows:

Production land (agriculture, fish pond, garden, forest) is based on market price

through recent actually transaction of land which is compared with districts and other

neighboring regions. If there is no recent actually transaction of land, it will be based

on production value of the land;

Residential land will be based on the currently tranaction of residential land in the

project's area and in the neighboring districts and regions. In case, there is no recent

land transaction, it will be based on sale in other region with similar characteristic;

Other related house and structure will be based on current market price of material

and labor without deduction of acquired materials;

Perennial tree is compensated in cash equivalent to current market price depending

on type, age and production value (in the future) of tree by the time of compensation;

Timber tree will be compensated in accordance with price in the nearest market,

basing on diameter trunk.

96. Replacement cost survey for road sections in Cam Thuy district has been conducted in

September 2017 and the results have been approved by Thanh Hoa PPC in Decisions No.

4136/QĐ-UBND dated 01st November, 2017 on approval of replacement cost for

compensation for house, construction works and resettlement works; Decisions No.

4128/QĐ-UBND dated 31st October, 2017 by Thanh Hoa PPC on approval of replacement

cost for compensation for trees and livestock; Document No. 14450/UBND-KTTC dated

24th November, 2017 by Thanh Hoa PPC on approval of other support to calculate

compensation for land; and Decision No. 1671/QĐ-UBND dated 10th October, 2017 by

Cam Thuy DPC on approval of land price have a coefficient of adjustment of 1 to calculate

compensation for land - Upgrading of NH 217 – phase 2, in Cam Thuy district (See Annex

5).

10.2. Budget for UREMDP

97. Total budget for UREMDP implementation is VND 152,885,405,008 (equivalent to USD

7,016,310.46). The budget, used from the Loan of ADB, includes (i) compensation,

assistance and resettlement payment cost; (ii) management cost; and (iii) contingency.

Costs for carrying out of external monitoring by the EMO mobilized for the entire Project

will be used from the Government budget as counterpart fund.




Table 27: The UREMDP Cost Calculation

No. Total AHs Unit Coefficie

nt

Average

unit price

(1.000VND)

Quantity

Total

AmountCost

(1.000VND)

I Compensation 110,692,532

1 Compensation for affected land

40,826,906

a Residential Land m2 25,061.4 39,088,822

b Agricultural Land m2 67,241.8 1,738,083

2 Compensation for Public Assets

28,600,000

a Power company Unit 8,100,000

b Cam Thuy DPC and water company

Unit 20,500,000

3 Cost for compensation for Trees and Crops

Tree/m2 2,495,714

4 Cost for compensation for house and structures

m/m2/m3

38,769,913

II Allowances 11,791,531

1 Allowance for job training and change of vocation

m2 67,241.8 2,591,648

2 Allowance for Garden & land

m2 50% 4,948.68 5,131,513

3 Loss of Income from Business (Non-registered business - shops)

AHs 30% 3,500 12 12,600

4 Allowance for vulnerable HHs, who lost land

AHs 1 1,000 492 492,000

5 Provision of life stabilization assistance for affected persons

AHs 1 71 793,080

6 Infrastructure Assistance for self relocated

AHs 1 52,000 28 1,456,000

7 Allowance for movement in Province

AHs 1 5,000 67 335,000

8 Allowance for temporary housing

AHs 6 1,000 67 402,000

9 Public land m2 1 31,224.7 154,390

10 Bonus for land handed-over on time

AHs 423,300

III Income Restoration Program

AHs 1 10,000 528 5,280,000

IV Total Direct Costs (I+II+III) 127,764,064

V Implementation Cost 11,222,668

1 DCARB Implementation Cost (5% x IV)

% 5% 127,764,064 1 6,388,203

2 Cadastral map and land measurement cost, and UREMDP prepare.

District 1 4,834,465 1 4,834,465

VI Total (IV+V) 138,986,732

VII Contingencies (10% x VI) % 10% 138,986,732 1 13,898,673

VIII TOTAL (VI+VII) 152,885,405

In USD 7,016,310.46




10.3. Use of Loan Funds for Resettlement Costs

98. In order to ensure timely commencement of civil works in Q4 2017, the Government and

ADB agreed to use part of additional loan to finance eligible expenditure related to land

acquisition and resettlement including removal and restoration of utilities, advance to civil

works contractors, and advance to consultants for undertaking construction supervision

and resettlement monitoring incurred before loan effectiveness, but not more than 12

months before the signing of the loan agreement.

99. The TL-PMU has established an imprest account at a commercial bank acceptable to ADB,

and the DCARBs in Cam Thuy districts has established sub-accounts in Cam Thuy District

State Treasury (with authorize from Thanh Hoa province State Treasury) for land

acquisition and resettlement and ensure that liquidation of any amount paid from the

sub-account requires the submission of: (i) a validation certificate issued by a qualified

appraiser engaged by the DCARBs to carry out replacement cost surveys; (ii) the results

of the DMS; and (iii) individual compensation plan signed by the affected households, and

that receipt of compensation payment is acknowledged by the affected households.

100. TL-PMU will make available to the DCARBs funds for resettlement which will cover (a)

payment for land, structures, and other fixed assets, (b) allowances to the project affected

persons, (c) administration expenses incurred by the DCARBs in relation to resettlement

updating and implementation, (d) payment for relocation of public utilities. The DCARBs

will be responsible in carrying out the payment and relocation of public utilities in

accordance with ADB’s Procurement Guidelines. TL-PMU will be responsible in

administering and monitoring loan funds for resettlement in accordance with ADB’s Loan Disbursement Handbook. The external monitoring agency will carry out its own monitoring

of compensation payments.

101. Flow of funds using loan funds for resettlement is shown in Figure below:

Figure 3: Flow of Funds for resettlement

10.4. Disbursement of Compensation and Assistance to Affected Households

102. With regard to disbursement of payment to APs, the following procedures will be followed.

Additional steps or supporting documents may be requested as necessary to meet ADB

and Government requirements.

a. The affected household will be notified through the village chiefs two weeks in




advance of the final schedule of payment of compensation and other entitlements.

The affected households will be advised to have with them the required documents

(such as LURC, ID, family book/civil registration certificates, DMS record,

Compensation Plan, etc.) when claiming their compensation and other

entitlements. If the affected household is unavailable to claim the compensation

payment on the scheduled date, he/she will inform local authorities as soon as

possible with a written authorization for a representative to claim the same on

his/her behalf, or the affected household may request the DCARB to reschedule a

later date for him/her to claim payment.

b. DCARB to disburse payment to APs (in commune office or a location both

acceptable to APs and DCC)

c. APs to sign Compensation Plan and Official Receipt and get copy for record

including DMS

d. DCARB to document status of payment, update records as part of the quarterly

progress report.

e. DCARB will prepare and submit liquidation with agreed supporting documents to

TL-PMU.



INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS P a g e | 7 1

K. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS

11.1. Ministry of Transport

103. The Ministry of Transport (MOT) will be the Executing Agency (EA) for the Project with

direct responsibility, through the Thang Long Project Management Unit (TL-PMU) for the

overall management and coordination of the proposed project.

104. TL-PMU, being the representative of the project, will be responsible for implementing and

managing activities of the project. For this site clearance plan, TL-PMU will:

a. Monitor and speed up implementation progress of site clearance plan to meet the

construction progress of the project as well as the implementation of IRP.

b. Assist and guide DCARB in financial procedures such as: (i) preparation of budget

plan; (ii) advantage payment/payment of site clearance capital; (iii) settlement

procedures with the Donor.

c. Assist and guide DCARB in LAR implementation in accordance with regulation of

ADB;

d. Ensure budget for implementation of site clearance plan and IRP, and timely

allocate fund in accordance with fund need registration and implementation

progress of districts.

e. Direct related departments, consultant and construction unit to coordinate with

DCARB during the process of implementing site clearance plan and Board of

Income Restoration Program in District to IRP; Deal with grievances of people on

the project.

f. Coordinate with external monitoring unit of resettlement in work.

11.2. Thanh Hoa Provincial Peoples’ Committee

105. The Provincial People’s Committee (PPC) will be overall responsible for resettlement activities within its administrative jurisdiction. The main responsibilities of the PPC include:

a. Carry out information campaign / project awareness on the project development to

all relevant institutions and various administrative levels;

b. As subproject investor for compensation, support and resettlement under the law

or authorize the People's Committees of Cam Thuy as the investors;

c. Agreed with the UREMDP (and its update) prepared for the Project

d. Direct its relevant departments such as Departments of finance, construction,

agriculture and rural development, transport and environment to help in the

preparation, updating, and implementation of the UREMDP including IRP.

e. Approve the unit rates which are detailed in the replacement cost survey report as

proposed by the qualified appraiser to enable DCARB in finalizing the

compensation plans.

a. Settle complaints and outstanding issues.

11.3. Cam Thuy District Peoples’ Committee

106. Cam Thuy District Peoples’ Committee, is the subproject investor under the Decision

No. 4490/QD-UBND dated 02nd November, 2015 of the Chairman of the People's

Committee of Thanh Hoa Province on the assignment of investment ownership of the




Compensation, Assistance, and Resettlement subproject of the Second Northen GMS

Project transport network improvement project, the responsibility of the DPC are:

a. Establish the District Compensation, Assistance, and Resettlement Board (DCARB)

and direct the DCARB and relevant district departments and communes to

appraise and implement the detailed compensation, assistance and resettlement

base on approved UREMDP;

b. Establish Board for Income Restoration Program at district level to implement

approved IRP.

c. To approve land compensation unit prices in cases where the adjustment

coefficient is equal to 1;

d. To approve land acquisition in the same time with approved compensation plans;

e. To approve adjusting LURC for households and individuals who have land/ house

recovered, in accordance with authorized decisions

f. Resolve complaints and grievances of APs.

107. District Compensation, Assistance, and Resettlement Board (DCARB), are established as

per issuance in Decision No 1301/QD-UBND dated 22nd August 2017 by Chairman of Cam

Thuy DPC. The DCARB is headed by the Vice-Chair of the District Peoples Committee

(DPC), and will include representatives from the Finance Department; the Natural

Resources and Environment Department; and other Department; Chair of affected

communes, Land management officer and Villages leader of affected communes. In

addition, Chair of the Fatherland Front, War Veteran Association, Farmers’ Association, Women’s Union, Youth’s Union; In each commune invite at least two representatives of

affected households. TL-PMU will only coordinate in accordance with Official letter No.

1665/TTg-CN by Prime Minister. The responsibilities of DCARB are:

a. Carry out dissemination of information on the UREMDP;

b. Organize, plan and carry out land recovery, compensation, assistance and other

resettlement activities in the district as per agreed UREMDP

c. Conduct the DMS and prepare compensation plans for affected persons and

submit them to DPC for review and approval;

d. Conduct consultation and participation activities, and coordination with various

stakeholders during updating and implementation of the REMDP;

e. Submit the update REDMP to TL-PMU and ADB for review and agreement;

f. Pay compensation and allowances, to affected persons after UREMDP has been

agreed between TL-PMU and ADB. Ensure the timely delivery of payments of

compensation, assistance and other entitlements to affected persons; and

g. Assist the DPC in the resolution of grievances at the district levels.

h. Administer use of loan funds for resettlement by preparing the necessary requests

for replenishment of funds and documentation for liquidation to TL-PMU.

108. Board in charge of implementing livelihood restoration program at district level:

which is established by DPCs, will be responsible for implementing IRP with but not limit to

following responsibilities: (i) developing livelihood restoration program in details and then




submitting the program to TL-PMU for reviewing before submitting to DPC for approval; (ii)

following up the detailed implementation plan of approved livelihood restoration program;

(iii) providing necessary documents to TL-PMU to timely allocate fund for livelihood

restoration activities; (iv) closely working with local authority at levels (DPC, CPC),

organizations/unions(Women union, farmer association) to find out resolutions for arising

issues during the process of implementing livelihood restoration program; (v) preparing

reports on implementation progress of livelihood restoration program to submit to TL- PMU

and Cam Thuy DPC.

11.4. Commune People’s Committees (CPC) 109. The CPC will assist the DCARB in their resettlement tasks. Specifically, the CPC will be

responsible for the following: (i) participate in the updating and implementation of REMDP

including IRP; identify potential replacement land for affected households; (iii) ensure that

vulnerable and severely affected households are properly consulted and that the concerns

and grievances of these households are heard, recorded and addressed in a timely

manner; (iv) certify DMS and payments made to affected households; and (v) assist in the

resolution of grievances.

110. Division of Labor, Invalids and Social Affairs (under Department of Labor, Invalids and Social

Affairs) will assist Cam Thuy DCARB in: (a) assisting local authority and project teams in

dealing with social issues determined during the process of implementing site clearance

plan; (b) involving in reviewing and assessment of poor and vulnerable households

determined by communes; (c) reviewing and proposing occupational orientation program of

province and district and conducting specific training for APs to help them find job; and

assisting AP to be eligible to participate in accessing as well as attending to such programs

when necessary.

11.5. Project Consultants

111. The consultant will review and assess (a) capacity of responsible organization at central

and project level to update and implement UREMDP and (b) training and capacity building

on technical assistance to implement the project. The project consultant will also draft and

conduct capacity building before or during the process of updating the site clearance plan.

11.6. External Monitoring Organizations

112. External monitoring is deemed necessary given that there are significant land recovery

and resettlement impacts on affected persons. The external monitoring organizations

(EMO) will be mobilized before commencement of any resettlement activities, prior to the

conduct of DMS for enabling a good quality baseline survey. The EMO will be required to

submit semi-annual reports on the progress of implementation and make any necessary

recommendations regarding the issues identified. All external monitoring reports will be

submitted simultaneously to TL-PMU and ADB. ADB will upload the external monitoring

reports on the ADB website.

113. The EMO will be engaged by TL-PMU using government counterpart funds. TL-PMU will

consult and seek concurrence from ADB on the terms of reference and draft contract of

the EMO.



IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE P a g e | 7 4

L. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE

114. For construction work, TL-PMU will not issue notice of possession to contractors until the

chairperson of DCARB has officially confirmed in writing that (i) payment has been fully

disbursed to the affected persons, rehabilitation measures are in place as per UREMDP

agreed between TL-PMU and ADB; (ii) already-compensated affected persons have

cleared the area in a timely manner; and (iii) the area is free from any encumbrances.

Table 28: Indicative Implementation Schedule

Activities Schedule

Preparation of UREMDP

TL-PMU submits UREMDP to ADB for review and acceptance From January, 2018

ADB accepts and discloses UREMDP to the website of ADB and Disclose UREMDP to AHs.

March, 2018

Approval of detailed compensation plans From March, 2018

Implementation of UREMDP

TL-PMU transfer the Budget to DCARBs for conducts compensation payment to AHs after UREMDP approved by ADB and Thanh Hoa PPC

From November, 2017

Finalized and Implementation of income restoration program From March, 2018 and complete in 12 months

Internal and external monitoring. Submission of social monitoring report to ADB

From March, 2018

Handing over of land to the construction contractor From March, 2018

Grievance Resolution Continuous, until resolution

* Monitoring includes other parts of the project



MONITORING AND REPORTING P a g e | 7 5

M. MONITORING AND REPORTING

13.1. Internal Monitoring

115. TL-PMU is directly responsible for internal monitoring of UREMDP implementation. The

Project will establish a program for internal monitoring and reporting with the following

objectives:

(i) To monitor and report that the Project UREMDP including IRP has been

implemented in an accurate and timely manner.

(ii) To assess whether and to what degree the UREMDP including IRP has achieved the

Project objectives.

(iii) To identify problems or potential problems and methods of responding immediately

to mitigate the problems.

116. The principal indicators for internal monitoring of resettlement activities include the

following:

(i) Payment of compensation to affected persons in various categories, according to

the compensation policy agreed in the UREMDP, with no discrimination against

gender, ethnicity or any other factor.

(ii) Public information dissemination and consultation procedures;

(iii) Support to vulnerable groups, if any.

(iv) Incom restoration activities provided to eligible affected households.

(v) Restoration of special facilities, including local roads, power supply, domestic water

supply and irrigation systems.

(vi) Grievances and appeals, the process and the results, including redress measures.

(vii) Adherence to grievance procedures and identification of outstanding issues that

require further attention and resolution.

(viii) Attention given to the priorities of affected persons regarding the options offered.

(ix) Coordination and completion of resettlement activities, award of civil works contracts

and notice of possession of sites.

(x) Staffing, training, work schedule and working effectiveness of resettlement offices at

all levels.

(xi) Administration of loan funds used for resettlement.

(xii) Conduct regular monitoring activities for temporary impacts during the construction if

occurred and include in regular monitoring report.

117. TL-PMU will develop an internal monitoring framework to supervise the resettlement

activities, and will establish a database for the land recovery and resettlement, and will

monitor the whole process`s of resettlement.

118. During implementation, the DCARB each district will establish relevant section of the

database and update them along with the resettlement progress for planning the

resettlement work in their own area. They will also timely transfer the on-going activity

records and report implementation progress to DCARB and then to TL-PMU so that a

continuous monitoring system can be realized.



MONITORING AND REPORTING P a g e | 7 6

119. Under the above internal monitoring system, a set of information tables will be developed

so that detailedland recovery and resettlement data could be collected from communes to

DCARB and TL-PMU.

120. The resettlement work will be periodically checked and inspected by TL-PMU. It will

prepare a semi-annual progress report and submit it to ADB.

13.2. External Monitoring (EMO)

121. The main objectives of external resettlement monitoring are to provide periodic review and

assessment of (i) achievement of resettlement objectives; (ii) changes in living standards

and livelihoods; (iii) restoration of the economic and social base of the affected persons;

(iv) effectiveness and sustainability of entitlements; and (v) the need for further mitigation

measures as required. Strategic lessons for policy development and plan establishment

will be also learnt from following and assessment of resettlement.

122. An external monitoring organization (EMO) has been mobilized by TL-PMU (TOR and

EMO selection have been accepted by ADB) to conduct monitoring in phase 2 of the

project, including Flyover bridge in Ha Trung district and road section passing Ba Thuoc

and Cam Thuy districts. During monitoring missions, if the temporary impacts during the

construction occurs. EMO is requested to monitor, record in the report, and provide the

recommendation and solution if needed. EMO has responsibility for submitting

semi-annual monitoring report to TL-PMU and ADB. EMO will also conduct assessment of

three to six months after completing resettlement activities. Copy of external monitoring

reports will be publicized in the office of CPC and site offices. These reports will be posted

on the website of ADB.



ANNEXES P a g e | 7 7

ANNEXES

Annex 1: Summary table of DMS and Compensation plan 78

Annex 2: SES summary tables 152

Annex 3: Public information booklet 160

Annex 4: Meeting Minutes 163

Annex 5: Replacement cost decision and RCS report 261

Annex 6: Internal Monitoring Report Template 299

Annex 7: External Monitor TOR 283



CAMTHUY’S UREMDP - Annex 1: Summary table of DMS and Compensation plan [Source: Cam Thuy’s DARCB – January, 2018] P a g e | 7 9

No. Name Village

Land (m2)

SAHs

(Y)

Relocation

HHs

(R)

Number

of HHs

member

Vulnerable HHs

Residential Land Agricultural Land

Single

FHHs with

dependents

HHs with

disabled

persons

Social policy HHs

Ethnic

minority

HHs

Poor

HHs

Acquire area Acquire area

% lost Invalids &

Martyrs

Other social

policy Residential Garden Land for

annual crops

Land for

perennial trees

26 Bùi Văn Đạo (Phạm Thị Tập) 8 52.3 4 X

27 Cao Ngọc Chính 8 335.0 B 3

28 Cao Ngọc Sơn (Lê Thị Thảo) 8 286.4 B 3

29 Cao Thị Thu (Trần Minh L ơng) 8 81.0 3 X

30 Lê Thị Toan (Ngô Văn Chung)

8 18.5

B 4

31 Lê Văn Thìn (Ngô Thị Xâm) 8 78.2 B 6

32 L u Văn Lan (Lê Thị Sữu) 8 150.0 B 3

33 Nguyễn Đăng Khoa (Phạm Thị Tuấn) 8 387.2

B 3

34 Nguyễn Hữu Nam (Lê Thị Mai)

8 13.7 4

35 Phạm Thị Hoài (Lê Văn Hùng) 8 56.3 Y R 8 X

36 Trần Đức Kinh (Lê Thị Phúc) 8 306.4 167.9 100.0% Y R 2

37 Trần Minh Kh ơng (Bùi Thị Cúc)

8 106.4

Y R 3

38 Trần Thị Mai (Trịnh Văn Chung)

8 89.7 Y R 4

39 Trần Thị Nhàn (Lê Minh Hải) 8 33.6 B 6

40 Trần Thị Sự (Phạm Bằng Hữu) 8 22.0 6

41 Trần Văn Lâm (Vũ Thị Thu Hiền) 8 103.5

Y R 5

42 Bùi Kim Trọng 9 6 X

43 Bùi Thị Hợp (Bùi H ng Liên) 9 60.3

6

44 Bùi Thị Quý (Phạm Đình Chung) 9

9 X

45 Bùi Thị Th ơng (Phạm Ba Duy) 9 2 X

46 Bùi Thị Thùy (Đặng Tiến Hội) 9

4 X

47 Bùi Th ợng Hải 9 5

48 Cao Văn Mạnh 9 6




No. Name Village

Land (m2)

SAHs

(Y)

Relocation

HHs

(R)

Number

of HHs

member

Vulnerable HHs


Single

FHHs with

dependents

HHs with

disabled

persons

Social policy HHs

Ethnic

minority

HHs

Poor

HHs


% lost Invalids &

Martyrs

Other social


annual crops

Land for

perennial trees

49 Đặng Tiến Bảy 9 1.3 3

50 Đinh Trọng Tiến 9 16.5 4

51 Đỗ Thị Chính 9 7

52 Đoàn Bá Ri 9 4

53 Hà Mạnh Phú 9 3

54 Hà Mạnh Ph ớc (Hoàng Thị H ng) 9 4

55 Hoàng Ngọc Cẩm 9 4

56 Hoàng Thị Hoa (Nguyễn Văn Bản) 9 5 X

57 Hoàng Thị Loan (Trần Văn Quyết) 9

5

58 Hoàng Văn Long ( Hoàng Th Trung) 9 20.1 3

59 Lê Anh Cúc 9 14.0 5 X

60 Lê Anh Thái 9 5.4 B 9

61 Lê Anh Tuấn 9 4

62 Lê Bá Hoàng 9 3.1 5

63 Lê Đăng Thao 9 222.4 B 5

64 Lê Thị Hà (Đ ng Sỹ Thủy) 9 57.9

4 X X

65 Lê Thị Mành 9 B 6

66 Lê Thị Ngọc 9 1

67 Lê Văn Hoàng 9 4.6 4 X

68 Lê Văn Phụng 9 3

69 Lê Văn Sáu 9 22.4 B 4

70 Lê Văn Tình 9 2.1 B 6

71 Lê Viết Hoan 9 4.8 4

72 L u Anh Thắng (Nguyễn Tân) 9 4

73 L u Quyết Tiến 9 163.1 Y R 3 X

74 L u Thanh Hóa 9 380.4 Y R 6 X

75 L u Văn Sỹ 9 60.8 Y R 5




No. Name Village

Land (m2)

SAHs

(Y)

Relocation

HHs

(R)

Number

of HHs

member

Vulnerable HHs


Single

FHHs with

dependents

HHs with

disabled

persons

Social policy HHs

Ethnic

minority

HHs

Poor

HHs


% lost Invalids &

Martyrs

Other social


annual crops

Land for

perennial trees

76 Ngô Ngọc Tú 9 1

77 Ngô Quang Tám 9 2.3 B 5

78 Ngô Quang Thủy 9 12.4 4

79 Ngô Quang Trung 9 5

80 Ngô Quang Tuấn 9 3

81 Ngô Quang V ơng 9 7

82 Ngô Thanh Tuân 9 4

83 Ngô Thị Kim Sơn 9 174.6 B 2

84 Ngô Văn Bảy 9 2.1 4

85 Ngô Văn Khánh 9 4

86 Ngô Văn Long (D ơng) 9 4

87 Ngô Văn Long (Tuyết) 9 2

88 Ngô Văn Quý 9 4

89 Ngô Văn Tuấn 9 3

90 Nguyễn Anh Tuấn 9 20.3 B 3

91 Nguyễn Bá Hùng 9 6.0 3

92 Nguyễn Bá Sáu 9 8.9 5

93 Nguyễn Hoành Sơn 9 3.1 4

94 Nguyễn Hữu Khoa 9 1.0 3

95 Nguyễn Minh Kỳ 9 28.2 3

96 Nguyễn Ngọc Luyến 9 26.3 5 X

97 Nguyễn Nhật Tân 9 20.7 3 X

98 Nguyễn Sóng Hải 9 7

99 Nguyễn Tất Tiến 9 27.7 4

100 Nguyễn Thế Sỹ 9 4

101 Nguyễn Thị Bình 9 0.5 3 X

102 Nguyễn Thị Chế 9 6

103 Nguyễn Thị Hằng 9 55.4 B 4

104 Nguyễn Thị Hợi 9 1.0 4

105 Nguyễn Thị H ng 9 1.4 2 X

106 Nguyễn Thị H ờng 9 2




No. Name Village

Land (m2)

SAHs

(Y)

Relocation

HHs

(R)

Number

of HHs

member

Vulnerable HHs


Single

FHHs with

dependents

HHs with

disabled

persons

Social policy HHs

Ethnic

minority

HHs

Poor

HHs


% lost Invalids &

Martyrs

Other social


annual crops

Land for

perennial trees

107 Nguyễn Thị Loan 9 0.3 2

108 Nguyễn Thị Minh 9 1 X

109 Nguyễn Thị Nga 9 3.1 3 X

110 Nguyễn Thị Nho 9 5

111 Nguyễn Thị Tuyết 9 66.4 B 4

112 Nguyễn Văn Bình 9 7.8 4

113 Nguyễn Văn Chính 9 3.5 4

114 Nguyễn Văn Đức 9 3

115 Nguyễn Văn Hùng (Quyên)

9 37.6 B 4

116 Nguyễn Văn Hùng (Tình)

9 5.2 5 X

117 Nguyễn Văn Linh 9 12.8 4

118 Nguyễn Văn Luyện 9 4

119 Nguyễn Văn Nhân 9 B 7

120 Nguyễn Văn Quy 9 16.6 4

121 Nguyễn Văn Tám 9 31.0 3

122 Nguyễn Văn Thơ 9 0.1 4

123 Nguyễn Văn Việt 9 48.3 Y R 5

124 Ninh Công Hiếu 9 3

125 Ninh Công Hòa 9 4

126 Ninh Công Minh 9 4

127 Phạm Mạnh Tuấn 9 49.7 4 X

128 Phạm Minh Châm 9 5 X

129 Phạm Minh Chí 9 B 4

130 Phạm Thị Dung 9 30.4 4

131 Phạm Thị Duyên 9 17.8 4

132 Phạm Thị Thành (Nguyễn Văn Sởi) 9 1.4

2 X

133 Phạm Thị Trang 9 20.5 4

134 Phạm Thùy Dung 9 26.0 3

135 Phạm Trọng Nam 9 60.2 B 5

136 Phạm Văn Điệp 9 35.6 8




No. Name Village

Land (m2)

SAHs

(Y)

Relocation

HHs

(R)

Number

of HHs

member

Vulnerable HHs


Single

FHHs with

dependents

HHs with

disabled

persons

Social policy HHs

Ethnic

minority

HHs

Poor

HHs


% lost Invalids &

Martyrs

Other social


annual crops

Land for

perennial trees

137 Phạm Văn Nhạc 9 4

138 Phạm Văn Tài 9 49.3 4 X

139 Tạ Quang Hùng 9 4

140 Tạ Quang Sơn 9 3

141 Tạ Thị Liên 9 5

142 Trần Đình V ợng 9 56.2 8

143 Trần Quang Định 9 33.2 6

144 Trần Thị Lan 9 16.3 4

145 Trần Thị ớc (Nguyễn Văn Năm) 9 24.1

6 X X

146 Trần Vinh Thủy 9 31.8 4

147 Trịnh Hùng Thủy 9 4 X

148 Trịnh Thị Dung 9 30.0 2

149 Trịnh Thị Giang 9 4

150 Trịnh Thị Ngọc 9 11.7 2 X

151 Trịnh Thị Tú 9 1.0 5

152 Trịnh Văn Truyền 9 5

153 Tr ơng Anh Dũng 9 4

154 Tr ơng Công Kiếm 9 114.8 B 6 X

155 Tr ơng Thị Mùi (Phạm Văn Thành) 9 74.5 B 9 X

156 Vũ Thị Lệ 9 4

157 Vũ Văn Nhớ 9 4

158 Vũ Văn Tân 9 3




Annex 1 – Table 2: DMS data of Cam Binh commune.

# Name Village

Land lost

SAHs (Y)

Relocation (R)

No. of HHs

member

Vulnerable HHs (X)


Commune land

Single FHH with

dependents

HHs with disabled persons

Social policy HHs

EM HHs

Poor HHs Residential Garden

Land for annual crops

Land for perennial

trees Forest

% of lost

Invalids & Martyrs

Other social policy

Total 4,547.4 1,379.3 17,254.6 126.2 89.3 5 29,619.5 6 1 2,111 8 3 8 1 215 1

1 Bàn H ng Nguyên Bình Sơn 41.8 0.5% 7 X 2 Bàn Thị Bình Bình Sơn 24.6 0.8% 3 X X 3 Bàn Văn Khoa Bình Sơn 48.2 0.9% 6 X 4 Bàn Văn L ợng Bình Sơn 68.7 1.0% 4 X 5 D ơng Kim Khang Bình Sơn 42.3 0.4% 4 X 6 Phạm Thị Nâu Bình Sơn 45.6 0.7% 5 X 7 Triệu Hùng Liêu Bình Sơn 45.3 2.1% 4 X 8 Triệu Văn Chinh Bình Sơn 110.4 4.8% 4 X 9 Triệu Thị Minh Bình Sơn 28.4 0.3% 5 X 10 Triệu Văn Bằng Bình Sơn 56.6 0.8% 4 X 11 Triệu Văn Nguyên Bình Sơn 3.9 89.3 0.9% 8 X 12 Triệu Văn Phúc Bình Sơn 61.2 0.6% 10 X 13 Triệu Văn Quảng Bình Sơn 32.0 0.8% 6 X 14 Triệu Văn Sinh Bình Sơn 53.4 1.7% 5 X 15 Triệu Văn Thành (Lan) Bình Sơn 78.6 0.9% 7 X 16 Bàn Tài V ợng Bình Yên 86.9 0.4% 4 X 17 Bàn Thị Hạnh Bình Yên 72.6 4 X 18 Bàn Thị Vui Bình Yên 27.1 4 X 19 Bàn Văn Báo Bình Yên 20.4 7.4 0.2% 4 X 20 Bàn Văn Chung Bình Yên 4 X 21 Bàn Văn C ờng Bình Yên 4 X 22 Bàn Văn Du Bình Yên 171.0 0.8% 7 X 23 Bàn Văn Đức Bình Yên 260.4 1.8% 8 X 24 Bàn Văn Hanh Bình Yên 41.3 7 X

25 Bàn Văn Hạnh (Phùng Sinh Thắng) Bình Yên 15.7 9 X

26 Bàn Văn Hoan Bình Yên 28.7 0.4% 4 X 27 Bàn Văn Hoàng Bình Yên 4 X 28 Bàn Văn Học Bình Yên 6 X

29 Bàn Văn H ng (Bàn Thị Bình) Bình Yên 88.3 0.5% 6 X

30 Bàn Văn H ng (Triệu Thị H ng) Bình Yên 5 X

31 Bàn Văn H ng (Triệu Thị Tiên) Bình Yên 6 X

32 Bàn Văn Hùng Bình Yên 4 X 33 Bàn Văn H ng Bình Yên 42.7 5 X 34 Bàn Văn Liên Bình Yên 62.1 0.3% 6 X 35 Bàn Văn Long Bình Yên 4 X 36 Bàn Văn Mạnh Bình Yên 4 X 37 Bàn Văn Minh Bình Yên 0.7 0.0% 6 X 38 Bàn Văn Thái Bình Yên 4 X 39 Bàn Văn Thắng Bình Yên 6 X 40 Bàn Văn Thanh Bình Yên 2 X 41 Bàn Văn Thành Bình Yên 37.8 9 X 42 Bàn Văn Thành Bình Yên 9 X




# Name Village

Land lost

SAHs (Y)

Relocation (R)

No. of HHs

member

Vulnerable HHs (X)


Commune land

Single FHH with

dependents


Social policy HHs

EM HHs



Land for perennial

trees Forest

% of lost

Invalids & Martyrs

Other social policy

43 Bàn Văn Thành (Phùng Văn Dung) Bình Yên 44.8 5 X

44 Bàn Văn Viện Bình Yên 4 X

45 Đào Văn Sơn (Bàn Thị Hạnh) Bình Yên 4 X

46 D ơng Thị Đức Bình Yên 78.5 0.4% 9 X

47 D ơng Văn Bình (Cao Thị Nhân) Bình Yên 19.7 5 X

48 D ơng Văn Hải Bình Yên 10.5 40.9 0.7% 5 X 49 D ơng Văn Minh Bình Yên 4 X 50 D ơng Văn Quang Bình Yên 67.3 7 X 51 D ơng Văn Thắng Bình Yên 8 X 52 D ơng Văn Thanh Bình Yên 22.4 0.2% 5 X 53 D ơng Văn Thành (Thân) Bình Yên 54.0 0.2% 4 X 54 Nguyễn Đức Long Bình Yên 6 X 55 Nguyễn Thị Mai Bình Yên 1 X 56 Nguyễn Thị Ngân Bình Yên 4.2 4 57 Nguyễn Tuấn Sinh Bình Yên 3.3 4

58 Nguyễn Văn Huấn (D ơng Thị Oánh) Bình Yên 4

59 Nguyễn Văn Huệ Bình Yên 138.0 5 X X 60 Nguyễn Xuân Hiền Bình Yên 34.5 4 61 Phùng Hạnh Long Bình Yên 50.0 47.3 8 X 62 Phùng Sinh Chung Bình Yên 8.5 5 X 63 Phùng Sinh Hòa Bình Yên 7 X 64 Phùng Sinh Hoàng Bình Yên 3 X 65 Phùng Sinh Nghĩa Bình Yên 3.7 24.5 0.2% 6 X 66 Phùng Sinh Ngọc Bình Yên 34.6 9 X 67 Phùng Sinh Phong Bình Yên 41.9 4 X 68 Phùng Sinh Phú Bình Yên 29.7 4 X 69 Phùng Sinh Phúc Bình Yên 6 X 70 Phùng Sinh Tiến Bình Yên 59.8 0.4% 6 X 71 Phùng Thị Cơ Bình Yên 9.3 6 X 72 Phùng Thị H ng Bình Yên 3 X 73 Phùng Thị Tâm Bình Yên 9.7 5 X 74 Phùng Văn Hải Bình Yên 3 X

75 Phùng Văn Linh (Lê Thị Thảo) Bình Yên 3 X X

76 Phùng Văn Nghim Bình Yên 85.9 8 X 77 Phùng Văn Quân Bình Yên 2.3 3 X 78 Phùng Văn Quyền Bình Yên 57.4 5 X 79 Phùng Văn Thái Bình Yên 16.7 3 X 80 Phùng Văn Thắng Bình Yên 20.8 0.2% 4 X 81 Phùng Văn Thanh Bình Yên 2 82 Phùng Văn Thanh Bình Yên 3.9 4 X 83 Triệu Hữu Khánh Bình Yên 20.1 0.2% 6 X 84 Triệu Minh H ng Bình Yên 20.6 1.1% 8 X 85 Triệu Phúc Nhuần Bình Yên 5.7 0.0% 6 X 86 Triệu Phúc Sơn Bình Yên 6 X 87 Triệu Tài Nghiêm Bình Yên 31.0 124.5 2.7% 4 X




# Name Village

Land lost

SAHs (Y)

Relocation (R)

No. of HHs

member

Vulnerable HHs (X)


Commune land

Single FHH with

dependents


Social policy HHs

EM HHs



Land for perennial

trees Forest

% of lost

Invalids & Martyrs

Other social policy

88 Triệu Thị Liên (Phùng Văn Nguyên) Bình Yên 60.2 8 X

89 Triệu Thị Thân Bình Yên 60.7 1.4% 5 X 90 Triệu Văn Bằng Bình Yên 15.1 0.2% 4 X 91 Triệu Văn Bình Bình Yên 33.0 2 X 92 Triệu Văn Chiến Bình Yên 4 93 Triệu Văn Đức Bình Yên 85.0 4 X 94 Triệu Văn Hiến Bình Yên 16.9 21.3 1.0% 4 X 95 Triệu Văn Hòa Bình Yên 5 X 96 Triệu Văn Long Bình Yên 9 X

97 Triệu Văn Minh (Phùng Sinh Thái) Bình Yên 13.8 9 X

98 Triệu Văn Nghĩa Bình Yên 5 X 99 Triệu Văn Nguyên Bình Yên 4 X 100 Triệu Văn Phúc Bình Yên 4 X 101 Triệu Văn Quý Bình Yên 3 X 102 Triệu Văn Thanh Bình Yên 16.5 5.7 0.1% 4 X 103 Triệu Văn Tiến Bình Yên 4 X 104 Triệu Văn Tuấn Bình Yên 4 X 105 Triệu Văn Xuân Bình Yên 4 X 106 Bùi Tuấn Hợi Săm 51.7 0.4% 5 107 Bùi Văn Hùng Săm 48.0 134.2 4 108 Bùi Văn Oanh Săm 11.5 0.8% 7 109 Bùi Văn Sơn Săm 1.3 0.1% 4

110 Cao Băng Nhân (Phạm Thị Hoan) Săm 29.4 3.0%

3 X

111 Cao Thị Chinh Săm 2

112 Cao Thị Nguyệt (Cao Văn Chung) Săm 33.7 1.4% 4

113 Cao Thị Tại Săm 25.2 0.3% 6 114 Cao Văn Đông Săm 0.4 4 115 Cao Văn Đức Săm 15.3 4 116 Cao Văn Hà Săm 9.1 4 117 Cao Văn L ơng Săm 21.5 4 118 Cao Văn Quyết Săm 24.9 1.1% 3 119 Cao Văn Thanh Săm 11.4 28.2 4.2% 2 120 Cao Xuân Thả Săm 7.3 2 121 Đặng Thế Bảy Săm 36.7 0.5% 3 122 Đặng Thế Nhẫn Săm 10.7 0.3% 6 123 Đặng Thị Hoa Săm 13.5 4 X 124 Đặng Văn Chung Săm 62.7 0.8% 3 125 Đặng Văn Hiếu Săm 40.5 0.6% 3 126 Đỗ Cao Chắt Săm 74.5 0.6% 1 127 Đỗ Cao Nghĩa Săm 97.6 7 128 Đỗ Cao Tám Săm 42.3 2.0% 5 129 Đỗ Cao V ơng Săm 5 130 Đỗ Văn Duy Săm 3

131 D ơng Thị Thông (Hoàng Văn Dũng) Săm 113.3 1.5% 3

132 Lại Thị T ớc Săm 21.6 4




# Name Village

Land lost

SAHs (Y)

Relocation (R)

No. of HHs

member

Vulnerable HHs (X)


Commune land

Single FHH with

dependents


Social policy HHs

EM HHs



Land for perennial

trees Forest

% of lost

Invalids & Martyrs

Other social policy

133 Lê Thị Chinh (Lê Bá Quý) Săm 25.3 4 X

134 Lê Thị Chung (Phạm Văn Ngà) Săm 10.2 0.3% 4 X

135 Lê Văn Đa Săm 123.3 5.1% 7 136 Lê Văn Định Săm 73.4 2.7% 2 137 Lê Văn Nam Săm 83.3 0.9% 5 138 Lê Văn Ngạn Săm 162.5 54.3 5.6% 10 139 Lữ Quang Minh Săm 100.0 313.1 Y R 5 140 Nguyễn Đức Ph ợng Săm 4 141 Nguyễn Đức Trung Săm 5.5 4 X 142 Nguyễn H ng Kỳ Săm 35.0 0.6% 4 143 Nguyễn Ngọc Vân Săm 5.8 7 144 Nguyễn Quốc Hải Săm 30.9 5 X 145 Nguyễn Quốc Hòa Săm 22.8 4 X

146 Nguyễn Thị Diệu (Đặng Ngọc Đỉnh) Săm 66.7 16.5 0.2%

3 X

147 Nguyễn Thị Dinh (Nguyễn Thị Khải) Săm 21.9 2 X X

148 Nguyễn Thị Lịch (Tào Văn Hùng) Săm 150.0 61.4 49.5 0.8% 6

149 Nguyễn Thị Liên Săm 19.8 0.3% 8 150 Nguyễn Thị Lý Săm 7.6 1 151 Nguyễn Thị Tảo Săm 14.3 0.7% 2 152 Nguyễn Thị Thanh (Phúc) Săm 54.5 2.7% 6 153 Nguyễn Thị Thỏa Săm 33.6 4 154 Nguyễn Thị Thủy Săm 8.6 3 155 Nguyễn Thị Vời Săm 65.0 19.2 0.3% 7 X 156 Nguyễn Văn Chiên Săm 42.0 0.6% 6 157 Nguyễn Văn Cơ Săm 118.7 1.6% 8 158 Nguyễn Văn Đ ng Săm 34.8 4 X 159 Nguyễn Văn Hòa Săm 1.1 5 160 Nguyễn Văn Hùng Săm 67.0 0.8% 3 161 Nguyễn Văn Khuê Săm 20.0 92.0 31.1 0.8% 6 162 Nguyễn Văn Lai Săm 58.5 107.9 4.1% 9 163 Nguyễn Văn Lý Săm 5.5 92.2 1.3% 3 164 Nguyễn Văn n Săm 76.6 4 165 Nguyễn Văn Ph ơng Săm 23.9 1.2% 4 166 Nguyễn Văn Thiện Săm 30.5 0.3% 7 167 Nguyễn Văn Thuận Săm 4 168 Nguyễn Văn Thủy Săm 43.2 18.0 0.2% 3 169 Nguyễn Văn Tích Săm 52.5 0.5% 6 170 Nguyễn Văn Toàn Săm 0.8 4 171 Nguyễn Vũ Thế Bắc Săm 14.5 4 172 Nguyễn Xuân Tr ờng Săm 4 173 Nhữ Văn Quang Săm 44.6 1.3% 6 174 Nhữ Văn Quy Săm 119.8 4 175 Phạm Thị Hoan Săm 3 X

176 Phạm Thị H ơng (Nguyễn Văn Long) Săm 33.8 2.4% 3

177 Phạm Thị Thanh Săm 58.5 0.9% 5




# Name Village

Land lost

SAHs (Y)

Relocation (R)

No. of HHs

member

Vulnerable HHs (X)


Commune land

Single FHH with

dependents


Social policy HHs

EM HHs



Land for perennial

trees Forest

% of lost

Invalids & Martyrs

Other social policy

178 Phạm Thị Thịnh Săm 31.3 3.7% 1

179 Phạm Thị Thuận (Vũ Văn Đắc) Săm

4

180 Phạm Văn Duy Săm 0.1 15.8 0.2% 4 X 181 Phạm Văn Hùng Săm 3 182 Phạm Văn Liền Săm 62.2 2.1% 5 183 Phạm Văn Luận Săm 19.7 2.5% 6 184 Phạm Văn Minh Săm 31.7 0.4% 6 185 Phạm Văn Ngọc Săm 12.3 4 X 186 Phạm Văn Sự Săm 2 187 Phạm Văn Tiên Săm 33.3 5 X 188 Phạm Văn Tỵ Săm 50.0 47.4 3 189 Phạm Xuân Tuyên Săm 44.4 0.6% 5 190 Quách H ng Hải Săm 114.2 205.8 2.9% 5 X

191 Quách Thị Liễu (Nguyễn Đức Quang) Săm 4.2 11.3 6 X X

192 Quách Văn Hoàng Săm 137.4 1.8% 3 193 Trịnh Ngọc Thắng Săm 124.8 34.7 4 X 194 Trịnh Thị Nhài Săm 15.0 123.3 5.3% 7 X 195 Tr ơng Công Can Săm 25.6 7 X 196 Tr ơng Công Chinh Săm 6.2 4 X 197 Tr ơng Công Xanh Săm 57.4 0.9% 5

198 Tr ơng Thị Kim (Vũ Xuân Hòa) Săm 5.8 2 X

199 Tr ơng Thị Phúc Săm 23.3 0.3% 5 200 Tr ơng Văn Chung Săm 13.1 5 X 201 Vũ Đình Giao Săm 40.1 0.6% 6 202 Vũ Thị Lan Săm 2.3 3 X 203 Vũ Thị Mai Săm 3.8 3 X 204 Vũ Văn Bình Săm 1.6 0.1% 4 205 Vũ Văn Thanh Săm 29.7 0.4% 5 206 Cao Thị Lái Sẻ 36.5 1.6% 4 X 207 Đỗ Thị Liên Sẻ 74.9 1.3% 1 X 208 Đỗ Thiện Phú Sẻ 122.6 1.2% 3 209 Đỗ Văn Tiến Sẻ 337.1 4.1% 7 210 Hà Văn Tích Sẻ 53.8 0.8% 3 X 211 Kh ơng L u Thúy Sẻ 4.0 0.4% 2 212 Lê Thị Cẩm Sẻ 23.4 0.2% 1 213 Lê Trần Tuyền Sẻ 56.9 4.1% 3 214 Lê Xuân Cộng Sẻ 42.3 0.4% 5 215 Lê Xuân Mạnh Sẻ 139.5 1.4% 4 216 Lê Xuân Ý Sẻ 8.8 0.1% 2 217 Nguyễn Hải Ninh Sẻ 62.8 3.9% 6 X X 218 Nguyễn H ng T Sẻ 75.0 1.1% 3 219 Nguyễn Minh Châu Sẻ 93.9 0.7% 3 220 Nguyễn Ngọc Thắng Sẻ 46.5 0.7% 5 221 Nguyễn Xuân L u Sẻ 119.2 1.4% 2 222 Phạm Thị Bình Sẻ 66.4 2.7% 4 X 223 Phạm Thị Chính Sẻ 262.2 3.5% 3 X 224 Phạm Thị Nghiêm Sẻ 24.0 2.9% 5 X 225 Phạm Thị N ơng Sẻ 33.0 0.2% 1 X X




# Name Village

Land lost

SAHs (Y)

Relocation (R)

No. of HHs

member

Vulnerable HHs (X)


Commune land

Single FHH with

dependents


Social policy HHs

EM HHs



Land for perennial

trees Forest

% of lost

Invalids & Martyrs

Other social policy

226 Phạm Thị Thoa Sẻ 98.7 1.5% 1 X 227 Phạm Văn C ơng Sẻ 28.5 0.4% 6 X 228 Phạm Văn Đại Sẻ 37.6 7.1% 4 X 229 Phạm Văn Doưn Sẻ 85.3 2.5% 4 X 230 Phạm Văn Hoàn Sẻ 288.1 1.3% 5 X 231 Phạm Văn H ng Sẻ 21.2 0.3% 7 X 232 Phạm Văn H ơng Sẻ 126.7 1.6% 5 X 233 Phạm Văn Khê Sẻ 5.6 0.1% 3 X 234 Phạm Văn Phi Sẻ 31.9 1.5% 4 235 Phạm Văn Phùng Sẻ 138.7 2.6% 4 X 236 Phạm Văn Vũ Sẻ 195.5 2.7% 5 237 Trần Đức Long Sẻ 88.7 1.2% 3 238 Trần Thị Thủy Sẻ 158.4 5.5% 1 X 239 Tr ơng Công Ch ơng Sẻ 139.0 0.5% 6 X 240 Tr ơng Công Việt Sẻ 194.9 7.8% 5 X 241 Cao Minh Ph ơng S 2.3 0.0% 6 X

242 Cao Thị Lai (Phạm Văn Duyệt) S 15.1 0.1% 2 X

243 Cao Văn Phan (Cao Đăng Khoa) S 136.4 0.5% 4 X

244 Hà Đăng Điệp S 58.9 0.7% 6 X 245 Hà Văn Đạt S 467.4 4.0% 6 X 246 Phạm Thị Hoa S 15.7 1.1% 2 X 247 Phạm Thị Nhung S 95.9 7.1% 1 X X 248 Phạm Thị Sao S 374.9 5.6% 7 X 249 Phạm Văn Chắc S 0.3 0.0% 7 X

250 Phạm Văn Địa (Phạm Văn Quang) S 301.4 2.5% 4 X

251 Phạm Văn Diện (Phạm Văn Toàn) S 62.4 0.6% 7 X X

252 Phạm Văn Kẹt S 89.0 0.5% 6 X 253 Phạm Văn Khởi S 82.2 0.7% 6 X 254 Phạm Văn Nghiệm S 287.3 3.7% 7 X 255 Phạm Văn Quý S 358.8 4.6% 4 X 256 Phạm Văn Vui S 510.6 9.3% 5 X 257 Bùi Ngọ Đức Tô 1 2.3 0.3% 4 258 Bùi Ngọc H ơng Tô 1 39.6 136.1 4.5% 4 259 Bùi Ngọc Tân Tô 1 2.4 0.1% 4 260 Bùi Ngọc Tỉnh Tô 1 51.4 1.2% 4 261 Bùi Thị Dung Tô 1 20.5 1.0% 4

262 Bùi Thị Lâm (Lê Xuân H ng) Tô 1 21.3

4 X

263 Bùi Thị Sang (Bùi Văn Tâm) Tô 1 4 X

264 Bùi Thị T ơi (Quách Văn Bốn) Tô 1 6.2 22.9 1.0% 4 X

265 Bùi Văn Minh Tô 1 47.0 121.4 11.8% Y 3 X 266 Bùi Văn Quyền Tô 1 73.6 2.0% 4 267 Bùi Xuân Bình Tô 1 39.2 1.2% 4 268 Bùi Xuân C ờng Tô 1 64.7 1.7% 4 269 Cao Thị Ngọc Tô 1 8.5 1 X




# Name Village

Land lost

SAHs (Y)

Relocation (R)

No. of HHs

member

Vulnerable HHs (X)


Commune land

Single FHH with

dependents


Social policy HHs

EM HHs



Land for perennial

trees Forest

% of lost

Invalids & Martyrs

Other social policy

270 Cao Văn Thiết Tô 1 0.2 0.0% 4 271 Đặng Ngọc Thái Tô 1 22.0 0.8% 4 272 Đặng Văn Hiền Tô 1 10.5 4 273 Đặng Văn Vĩnh Tô 1 24.2 6.1% 4 274 Đào Công Tựu Tô 1 141.1 9.3% 4 275 Đào Thị Tuyết Tô 1 87.7 3.8% 4 276 Đỗ Huy Bình Tô 1 77.6 2.7% 4 277 Đỗ Huy Hà Tô 1 28.2 12.9 1.6% 6

278 Đỗ Minh Hải (Đỗ Tất Thắng) Tô 1 79.6 3.6% 4

279 Đỗ Quang Cách Tô 1 162.8 1.7% 4

280 Đỗ Thị Hoan (Trịnh Văn Sự) Tô 1 285.4 11.2% Y 1 X

281 Đặng Văn Thái (Đỗ Thị Minh) Tô 1 32.7 4

282 Đỗ Thị Nga (Đặng Văn Quảng) Tô 1 88.9 4.0% 4

283 Đỗ Văn Đệ Tô 1 83.4 2.3% 4 284 Đỗ Văn Huynh Tô 1 12.9 0.5% 4 285 Đỗ Văn Quang Tô 1 19.6 131.3 5.9% 4

286 Đỗ Văn Sáu (Đỗ Văn Nghi) Tô 1 31.1 0.6% 4

287 Đỗ Văn Tôn Tô 1 30.8 3 288 Lê Duy Ngọc Tô 1 81.0 1.9% 4 289 Lê Huy Lợi Tô 1 23.0 0.9% 4 290 Lê Phi Dũng Tô 1 5

291 Lê Thị Khánh (Đỗ Hùng Sơn) Tô 1 31.9 1.5% 3

292 Lê Thị Ph ơng (Đào Duy Minh) Tô 1 17.4 1.8% 4

293 Lê Văn C ơng Tô 1 41.3 1.7% 4 294 Lê Văn Thủy Tô 1 12.5 8

295 Lê Xuân Bắc (Lê Xuân Sâm) Tô 1 0.8 0.3% 4

296 Lê Xuân Nghĩa Tô 1 50.6 1.0% 4 297 Lê Xuân Quyết Tô 1 2.2 0.1% 4 298 Lê Xuân Vụ Tô 1 15.2 0.2% 4 299 Nguyễn Đức Hùng Tô 1 35.7 3.2% 4 300 Nguyễn Duy Chinh Tô 1 161.3 4.4% 4 301 Nguyễn Hoàng Lâm Tô 1 8.6 4 302 Nguyễn Hữu Hoằng Tô 1 14.6 111.5 5.8% 4 303 Nguyễn Hữu Thắng Tô 1 159.3 4.3% 4 304 Nguyễn Hữu Tùng Tô 1 2.0 4 305 Nguyễn Ngọc Bích Tô 1 2.9 66.4 1.8% 4 306 Nguyễn Thị Ký Tô 1 42.6 5.3% 4 307 Nguyễn Thị Ngân Tô 1 26.5 8.2% 4 308 Nguyễn Thị Ngọc Tô 1 32.8 6 309 Nguyễn Thị Nhàn Tô 1 3 310 Nguyễn Thị Thanh Tô 1 37.0 2.7% 4 311 Nguyễn Trọng Thành Tô 1 21.8 4 312 Nguyễn Trọng Trung Tô 1 28.8 5 X




# Name Village

Land lost

SAHs (Y)

Relocation (R)

No. of HHs

member

Vulnerable HHs (X)


Commune land

Single FHH with

dependents


Social policy HHs

EM HHs



Land for perennial

trees Forest

% of lost

Invalids & Martyrs

Other social policy

313 Nguyễn Văn Bản Tô 1 28.6 104.3 4.9% 5 314 Nguyễn Văn Bôi Tô 1 61.5 2.9% 4 315 Nguyễn Văn Bút Tô 1 49.8 0.2% 4 316 Nguyễn Văn Chính Tô 1 7.6 0.3% 4 317 Nguyễn Văn Đáng Tô 1 81.1 7.3% 4 318 Nguyễn Văn Đào Tô 1 22.7 83.9 2.4% 1 319 Nguyễn Văn Minh Tô 1 3.2 1.5% 4 320 Nguyễn Văn Sự Tô 1 31.6 19.2 0.7% 4 321 Nguyễn Xuân Hải Tô 1 7.5 4 322 Phạm Ngọc Điền Tô 1 40.8 1.3% 5 X 323 Phạm Thị Hán Tô 1 19.3 0.7% 4 324 Phạm Thị Hạnh Tô 1 63.0 2.0% 4 X 325 Phạm Thị Nhuần Tô 1 43.9 1 X 326 Phạm Thị Quyết Tô 1 4 327 Phạm Thị Thóc Tô 1 70.6 1.5% 4

328 Phạm Thị Vân (Đỗ Thị Thu Hòa) Tô 1 79.6 1.6% 4 X

329 Phạm Thị Vui Tô 1 76.4 2.9% 4

330 Phạm Văn Bằng (Phạm Nh Ý) Tô 1 104.1 2.5% 4

331 Phạm Văn Chiến Tô 1 85.0 2.6% 4 332 Phạm Văn Định Tô 1 8.0 0.3% 4 333 Phạm Văn Quảng Tô 1 22.2 4 X 334 Phạm Văn Tĩnh Tô 1 13.4 9 335 Phạm Văn Vinh Tô 1 8.4 4 X 336 Phạm Văn Yên Tô 1 43.9 5.7% 4

337 Phan Thị Tr ờng (Phạm Văn Đại) Tô 1 47.7 2.4% 4

338 Trịnh Công Bình Tô 1 45.6 1.4% 4 339 Trịnh Trọng Tâm Tô 1 67.3 1.6% 4 340 Trịnh Xuân D ơng Tô 1 75.8 5.5% 4

341 Tr ơng Thị Dự (Quách Văn Tám) Tô 1 37.1

4 X

342 Vũ Văn Sinh Tô 1 106.1 2.3% 4

343 Bùi Thị Yên (Phạm Văn T ởng) Tô 2 18.8 4 X

344 Cao Thị Vinh Tô 2 5 X 345 Cao Văn Thiết Tô 2 10.9 0.2 0.1% 4 346 Cao Xuân Tr ờng Tô 2 72.2 3 347 Đỗ Đức Th ờng Tô 2 4 348 Đỗ Nhuận Tô 2 100.4 3.0% 5 349 Đỗ Quang Tr ờng Tô 2 54.2 3 350 Đỗ Thế Ph ơng Tô 2 19.8 151.1 3.3% 2

351 Đỗ Thị H ng (Nguyễn Văn Chuẩn) Tô 2 28.7 0.5% 4

352 Đỗ Thị T ơi Tô 2 9.4 4 353 Đỗ Văn Chung Tô 2 26.1 3 X 354 Đỗ Văn C ờng Tô 2 71.0 6 355 Đỗ Văn Huân Tô 2 1.3 4 356 Đỗ Văn L ơng Tô 2 26.4 165.8 7.0% 4 357 Đỗ Viết H ng Tô 2 95.5 131.2 3.8% 2




# Name Village

Land lost

SAHs (Y)

Relocation (R)

No. of HHs

member

Vulnerable HHs (X)


Commune land

Single FHH with

dependents


Social policy HHs

EM HHs



Land for perennial

trees Forest

% of lost

Invalids & Martyrs

Other social policy

358 Hoàng Minh Thức Tô 2 86.3 2.1% 5

359 Lê Duy Hoàn (Nguyễn Thị Dự) Tô 2 3.2

2

360 Lê Duy Trung Tô 2 4.2 4 361 Lê Huy Đắc Tô 2 95.0 3

362 Lê Thị Dung (Đỗ Văn Thọ) Tô 2 55.4 4 X

363 Lê Thị Tuyết Tô 2 3 364 Lê Văn Hoàn Tô 2 4 365 Lê Xuân Nha Tô 2 63.4 2.3% 5

366 Lữ Tuyên Hòa (Bùi Thị Điền) Tô 2 3.9 2 X

367 Nguyễn Đăng Cộng Tô 2 33.8 0.3% 4 368 Nguyễn Ngọc Hiệp Tô 2 8.8 4 369 Nguyễn Quốc Ph ơng Tô 2 86.5 1.2% 8 370 Nguyễn Quốc Viên Tô 2 3 371 Nguyễn Quốc V ơng Tô 2 7.9 4 372 Nguyễn Thế Chính Tô 2 10.6 4 373 Nguyễn Thế Quang Tô 2 6

374 Nguyễn Thị Chi (Nguyễn Văn Lộc) Tô 2 166.9 7 X

375 Nguyễn Thị Dự Tô 2 25.9 6 376 Nguyễn Thị Hằng Tô 2 19.5 4 377 Nguyễn Thị Huệ Tô 2 21.3 3 378 Nguyễn Thị H ờng Tô 2 15.3 3 379 Nguyễn Thị Liên Tô 2 5.4 4 380 Nguyễn Thị Lý Tô 2 25.3 1 381 Nguyễn Thị Miên Tô 2 1.0 4

382 Nguyễn Thị Nga (Bùi Thị Thanh) Tô 2 5.3 33.8 2.8% 4 X

383 Nguyễn Thị Nghĩa Tô 2 27.1 4

384 Nguyễn Thị Vân (Bùi Văn Sơn) Tô 2 61.3 2.3% 4

385 Nguyễn Trung Liên Tô 2 17.9 158.7 5.8% 3 X 386 Nguyễn Văn Bình Tô 2 5.2 4 X 387 Nguyễn Văn B i Tô 2 142.0 40.7 1.3% 5 388 Nguyễn Văn Cộng Tô 2 10.2 3

389 Nguyễn Văn Đại (Vũ Thị Ph ơng) Tô 2 25.6 4

390 Nguyễn Văn Hiếu Tô 2 6.0 4 391 Nguyễn Văn Nhân Tô 2 32.1 2 X 392 Nguyễn Văn Thiên Tô 2 7.7 6 393 Nguyễn Văn T Tô 2 21.9 5 394 Phạm Ngọc Thuyết Tô 2 2.9 5 395 Phạm Thị Bào Tô 2 63.6 4.7% 4 X

396 Phạm Thị Lệ (Nguyễn Ngọc Huấn) Tô 2 58.0 6 X

397 Phạm Thị Quân (Nguyễn Văn Tuất) Tô 2 51.9 1.8% 7 X

398 Phạm Thị Quyên (Lê Văn Tuy) Tô 2 12.3 6 X




# Name Village

Land lost

SAHs (Y)

Relocation (R)

No. of HHs

member

Vulnerable HHs (X)


Commune land

Single FHH with

dependents


Social policy HHs

EM HHs



Land for perennial

trees Forest

% of lost

Invalids & Martyrs

Other social policy

399 Phạm Thị Thanh Tô 2 3 400 Phạm Văn A Tô 2 34.1 6 401 Phạm Văn C Tô 2 6 X 402 Phạm Văn Đối Tô 2 122.6 4.0% 3 X 403 Phạm Văn Lý Tô 2 92.1 10.1% Y 5

404 Phạm Văn Quyền (GCN Phạm Việt Lý) Tô 2 376.9 11.4% Y 5 X

405 Phạm Văn Sáu Tô 2 4 X 406 Phạm Văn Thái Tô 2 4 X 407 Phạm Văn Yến Tô 2 5

408 Quách Thị Hải (Hoàng Văn Khánh) Tô 2 142.0 100.0 143.1 4.6% 7 X

409 Quách Văn Chắc Tô 2 96.9 6 X

410 Quách Văn Niễn (Quách Ngọc Long) Tô 2 133.7 5.3% 5 X

411 Tr ơng Thị Hạnh Tô 2 4 X 412 Vũ Xuân Hoạt Tô 2 208.0 183.8 18.3% Y 5 X 413 Vũ Xuân Thảnh Tô 2 6.3 4 414 Bùi Minh Thanh Trung Tâm 4 415 Bùi Thị Hà Trung Tâm 4 X 416 Bùi Văn Lại Trung Tâm 3 417 Cao Bằng Nhân Trung Tâm 4 418 Cao Đại Hành Trung Tâm 3 X 419 Cao Thị Minh Trung Tâm 2 X 420 Cao Thị Phê Trung Tâm 3 X 421 Đỗ Thị Ph ơng Trung Tâm 2 422 D ơng Huy Hoàng Trung Tâm 4 423 Hà Bình Minh Trung Tâm 4 X 424 Hà Thị Thu Hiền Trung Tâm 5 X 425 Hà Trung Trực Trung Tâm 3 X 426 Lê Khả Thảo Trung Tâm 3 427 Lê Minh Đức Trung Tâm 1 428 Lê Thị Cẩm Trung Tâm 5 429 Lê Thị Ph ơng Trung Tâm 4 430 Lê Văn Dũng Trung Tâm 4 431 Lê Văn Hạnh Trung Tâm 4 432 Lê Văn Ngọc Trung Tâm 3 433 Lê Xuân Hòa Trung Tâm 6 434 Lê Xuân Thắng Trung Tâm 5 435 Mai Thị Loan Trung Tâm 4 436 Ngô Thanh Tuy Trung Tâm 6 X 437 Nguyễn Đăng Giang Trung Tâm 4 438 Nguyễn Đăng Hộ Trung Tâm 3 X 439 Nguyễn Đăng Lợi Trung Tâm 5 440 Nguyễn Đức Dục Trung Tâm 2 441 Nguyễn Ngọc Chuẩn Trung Tâm 2 442 Nguyễn Thị Hảo Trung Tâm 5 443 Nguyễn Thị H ờng Trung Tâm 4 444 Nguyễn Thị Liên Trung Tâm 6 445 Nguyễn Thị Lợi Trung Tâm 2 446 Nguyễn Thị Thúy Trung Tâm 3




# Name Village

Land lost

SAHs (Y)

Relocation (R)

No. of HHs

member

Vulnerable HHs (X)


Commune land

Single FHH with

dependents


Social policy HHs

EM HHs



Land for perennial

trees Forest

% of lost

Invalids & Martyrs

Other social policy

447 Nguyễn Thiện Thi Trung Tâm 4 448 Nguyễn Tiến H ng Trung Tâm 4 449 Nguyễn Trung Quốc Trung Tâm 4 450 Nguyễn Văn Trung Trung Tâm 4 451 Nguyễn Văn Hải Trung Tâm 2 452 Nguyễn Văn Lộc Trung Tâm 4 453 Nguyễn Văn Nga Trung Tâm 3 X 454 Nguyễn Văn Thanh Trung Tâm 4 455 Nguyễn Xuân H ơng Trung Tâm 4 X 456 Nguyễn Xuân Sinh Trung Tâm 6 457 Phạm Đình Tuy Trung Tâm 4 X 458 Phạm Minh Tuấn Trung Tâm 4 X 459 Phạm Ngọc H i Trung Tâm 2 X X

460 Phạm Thị Hà (Nguyễn Đức Ninh) Trung Tâm 4 X

461 Phạm Thị Hằng Trung Tâm 3 462 Phạm Thị Hoan (Nhân) Trung Tâm 3 463 Phạm Thị Liễu Trung Tâm 1 464 Phạm Thị Ngơi Trung Tâm 5 X 465 Phạm Thị Thu Trung Tâm 4 X 466 Phạm Thị Vân Trung Tâm 5 467 Phạm Tr ờng Sinh Trung Tâm 3 X 468 Phạm Văn Hùng Trung Tâm 8 469 Phạm Văn Luận Trung Tâm 7 X 470 Phạm Văn Mạnh Trung Tâm 4 X 471 Phạm Văn Nhuận Trung Tâm 3 472 Phạm Văn Sáu Trung Tâm 3 X 473 Phạm Văn Thanh Trung Tâm 4 X 474 Quách Thị Điểm Trung Tâm 2 X

475 Quách Thị Huệ (Lê Xuân Sinh) Trung Tâm 4 X

476 Quách Văn Thiên Trung Tâm 3 X 477 Trần Đình Đại Trung Tâm 3 478 Trịnh H ng Tú Trung Tâm 4 479 Trịnh Thị Nhài Trung Tâm 7 480 Trịnh Trọng Lâm Trung Tâm 4 481 Tr ơng Công Hữu Trung Tâm 6 X 482 Tr ơng Công Minh Trung Tâm 6

483 Tr ơng Thị Hiệp (Phạm Văn Ph ợng) Trung Tâm 6 X

484 Tr ơng Thị Yến (Lê Xuân Hoàng) Trung Tâm 4 X

Trạm Kiểm Lâm (Phạm Văn Tin - Tr ởng trạm)

UBND xư Cẩm Bình 29,619.5




Annex 1 – Table 3: DMS data of Cam Thach commune

# Name Village

Land lost

SAHs (Y)

(R) Relocatio

n

No. of HHs

member

Vulnerable HHs (X)

Residential Land Agricultural Land Commune

land

Single FHH with

dependents


Social policy HHs EM HHs



Land for perennial trees

Forest % of lost

Invalids & Martyrs

Other social policy

Total 596.5 124.7 5,742.4 198.6 1,271.8 5 725.7 7 2 882 5 0 2 1 95 0

1 Bùi Văn Từng Bùi 2

2 Nguyễn Đức Dục Bùi 5

3 Phạm Thị Chủ Bùi 78.2 3.3% 8 X

4 Nguyễn Thị Tình Chén 5.0 B 3

5 Bùi Hà Quyền Chén 14.1 6 X

6 Bùi Thị Sen Chén Y R 4

7 Bùi Văn Chính Chén 83.5 3.2% 4 X

8 Bùi Văn Niên Chén Y R 4 X

9 Bùi Văn Thành Chén 7 X

10 Đỗ Thị Lải Chén 5 X

11 Đỗ Thị Lan Chén 4

12 Đỗ Văn Sáu Chén 5

13 Đỗ Văn Thắng Chén 9.6 4

14 Hà Thế Hùng Chén 4 X

15 Hoàng Minh Thành Chén 25.4 4

16 Hoàng Văn An Chén 124.7 195.8 7.1% 4 X

17 Hoàng Văn Thọ (Hoàng Thị Nga) Chén 4

18 Lê Chinh Hoàn Chén 5

19 Lê Đức Minh Chén 3 X

20 Lê Văn Chung Chén 5.5 6

21 Lê Văn Quang Chén 1

22 Lê Viết Kiệm Chén 4

23 Nguyến Ánh Sao Chén 5.0 4

24 Nguyễn Chí Doanh Chén 18.8 0.6% 2 X

25 Nguyễn Hữu Th Chén 8.9 3

26 Nguyễn Thị Tuyến Chén 3 X

27 Nguyễn Tiến Dũng Chén 4

28 Nguyễn Văn Hiếu Chén 2




# Name Village

Land lost

SAHs (Y)

(R) Relocatio

n

No. of HHs

member

Vulnerable HHs (X)


land

Single FHH with

dependents






Forest % of lost

Invalids & Martyrs

Other social policy

29 Nguyễn Văn Long Chén 15.5 3 X

30 Nguyễn Văn Mạnh Chén 11.9 4

31 Nguyễn Văn Phớn Chén 12.5 6 X

32 Nguyễn Văn Thái Chén 12.6 5

33 Phạm Bá Bàn Chén 5

34 Phạm Mạnh Hùng Chén 77.3 2.8% 6 X

35 Phạm Minh Tuyển Chén 4 X

36 Phạm Quốc Hội Chén 121.3 4.3% 8 X

37 Phạm Quốc Ph ơng Chén 1.0 2 X

38 Phạm Sậu Chén 3.5 1,271.8 26.1% Y 4 X

39 Phạm Thanh Năm Chén 1.4 0.1% 4

40 Phạm Thị Nê Chén 15.9 1.2% 5

41 Phạm Thị Ph ờng Chén 30.1 0.8% 8 X

42 Phạm Văn Chân Chén 349.0 5 X

43 Phạm Văn Chuyên Chén 20.1 3 X

44 Phạm Văn H i Chén 23.8 1.1% 3 X X

45 Phạm Văn Lai Chén 5 X

46 Phạm Văn Luận Chén 7.9 0.2% 3 X

47 Phạm Văn Mưn Chén 20.1 2.8% 7

48 Phạm Văn Phỉnh(Phạm Văn L ơng) Chén 65.7 5.1% 4 X

49 Phạm Văn Quyền Chén 3

50 Phạm Văn Viễn Chén 49.1 1.8% 3 X

51 Phạm Xuân Viện Chén 1.9 11.0 0.7% 4 X

52 Phan Thanh Sơn Chén 8.4 2

53 Phan Thị Thủy Chén 12.3 1

54 Phan Văn Thảo Chén 4

55 Phùng Bá Chung Chén 4.2 4 X

56 Phùng Bá Hiền Chén 10.4 3 X

57 Phùng Bá Khanh Chén 2.0 3

58 Phùng Bá Thắng (Hà) Chén 6.8 35.3 1.1% 9




# Name Village

Land lost

SAHs (Y)

(R) Relocatio

n

No. of HHs

member

Vulnerable HHs (X)


land

Single FHH with

dependents






Forest % of lost

Invalids & Martyrs

Other social policy

59 Phùng Bá ớc Chén 1.4 4

60 Phùng Văn Uy Chén 8.1 4 X

61 Quách Thị Tân Chén 149.5 11.8% Y 4

62 Quách Văn Hoạt Chén 71.0 3.2% 3 X

63 Quách Văn Sự Chén 13.6 0.6% 4 X

64 Tr ơng Công Chiến Chén 11.7 4

65 Hoàng Khắc Hải Chiềng 1 4

66 Bùi Văn An Chiềng 1 3

67 Bùi Văn Định Chiềng 1 42.2 1.2% 5 X

68 Bùi Văn ớc Chiềng 1 3.5 0.2% 4 X

69 Đỗ Thị Huyền Chiềng 1 4

70 Hà Hùng Tiến Chiềng 1 6 X

71 Hà Văn Biên Chiềng 1 120.0 8.7% 3 X

72 H Đại Đoàn Chiềng 1 4

73 Hoàng Duy Châu Chiềng 1 5

74 Hoàng Duy T ơng Chiềng 1 36.1 3.1% 6

75 Hoàng Khắc Huy Chiềng 1 4

76 Hoàng Kim Thành Chiềng 1 4

77 Hoàng Thị Nhung Chiềng 1 4

78 Lê Đăng Tình Chiềng 1 19.0 0.5% 8

79 Lê Đình Quế Chiềng 1 4

80 Lê Đức Bình Chiềng 1 86.7 2.4% 2

81 Lê Gia Dũng Chiềng 1 4

82 Lê Ngọc Hiền (Thảo) Chiềng 1 4

83 Lê Thị Thảo (Lê Viết Khâm)

Chiềng 1 4

84 Lê Thị Tuyết Chiềng 1 4 X

85 Lê Thị Xoan Chiềng 1 65.7 2.5% 4 X

86 Lê Văn X ởng Chiềng 1 11

87 Lê Viết Khoa Chiềng 1 6

88 Lê Viết Luận Chiềng 1 3




# Name Village

Land lost

SAHs (Y)

(R) Relocatio

n

No. of HHs

member

Vulnerable HHs (X)


land

Single FHH with

dependents






Forest % of lost

Invalids & Martyrs

Other social policy

89 Lê Xuân Chung Chiềng 1 7

90 Lê Xuân Viết Chiềng 1 34.6 3.8% 2 X

91 Nguyễn Ngọc Thái Chiềng 1 3

92 Nguyễn Thị Hiền Chiềng 1 4 X

93 Nguyễn Thị Lai Chiềng 1 1.6 0.0% 4

94 Nguyễn Văn Khánh Chiềng 1 4

95 Nguyễn Văn Thìn Chiềng 1 4

96 Nguyễn Văn Tuấn Chiềng 1 3

97 Nguyễn Xuân Côi Chiềng 1 66.7 5.1% 2

98 Nguyễn Xuân Kính Chiềng 1 43.0 1.0% 5

99 Phạm Bá Nhàn Chiềng 1 4 X

100 Phạm Đức Chí Chiềng 1 3 X

101 Phạm Phúc Chiều Chiềng 1 4 X

102 Phạm Thế Son Chiềng 1 61.6 3.0% 8 X

103 Phạm Thị Hoa Chiềng 1 2 X X

104 Đỗ Thị H ờng Chiềng 1 3 X

105 Phạm Thị Tĩnh Chiềng 1 4

106 Phạm Văn Đài Chiềng 1 28.5 2.1% 4 X

107 Phạm Văn Đào Chiềng 1 74.6 3.7% 5 X

108 Phạm Văn Dự Chiềng 1 127.2 3.1% 8 X

109 Phạm Văn Hạch Chiềng 1 128.3 2.5% 6 X

110 Phạm Văn Học Chiềng 1 4

111 Phạm Văn H ng Chiềng 1 108.5 5.4% 7 X

112 Phạm Văn Khuyến Chiềng 1 5 X

113 Phạm Văn Quý Chiềng 1 5 X

114 Phạm Văn Tâm Chiềng 1 68.5 2.2% 6 X

115 Phạm Văn Tuân Chiềng 1 4

116 Phạm Văn Viên Chiềng 1 263.1 9.8% 6 X

117 Phan Thị Sơn Chiềng 1 4

118 Phạm Thị Thúy (Phùng Bá Bốn) Chiềng 1 41.3 4.3% 7 X




# Name Village

Land lost

SAHs (Y)

(R) Relocatio

n

No. of HHs

member

Vulnerable HHs (X)


land

Single FHH with

dependents






Forest % of lost

Invalids & Martyrs

Other social policy

119 Phùng Bá Hoàn Chiềng 1 8

120 Phùng Bá Thắng (Tuyết) Chiềng 1 24.6 1.1% 3

121 Phùng Bá Tiến Chiềng 1 3

122 Phùng Bá Toan Chiềng 1 4

123 Phùng Bá Tuân Chiềng 1 4 X

124 Quách Công Thạch Chiềng 1 70.1 3.1% 4 X

125 Quách Văn H ng Chiềng 1 224.7 9.3% 7 X

126 Quách Văn Toàn Chiềng 1 14.2 0.3% 7 X

127 Tạ Văn Tám Chiềng 1 4

128 Trần Viết Hào Chiềng 1 3.8 4.0% 5

129 Trần Viết Phúc Chiềng 1 7

130 Trịnh Hữu Thủy Chiềng 1 10 X

131 Tr ơng Thi Thu Chiềng 1 4

132 Tạ Xuân Tám Chiềng 1 4

133 Bùi Quốc Toản Chiềng 2 139.5 6.5% 6 X

134 Bùi Thị Mạnh Chiềng 2 98.0 2.8% 7 X

135 Bùi Văn Dự Chiềng 2 42.0 0.7% 8 X

136 Bùi Văn Năm Chiềng 2 191.0 19.3% Y 4 X

137 Cao Thanh Chung Chiềng 2 4 X

138 Cao Thị Thành Chiềng 2 18.2 2.1% 5 X

139 Đỗ Thị Tuyết Chiềng 2 4

140 Đỗ Văn Ph ơng Chiềng 2 114.2 4.8% 4

141 Đỗ Văn Sơn Chiềng 2 4

142 Đỗ Văn Tài Chiềng 2 50.3 1.4% 5

143 Hoàng Kim Danh Chiềng 2 112.5 3.7% 7

144 Hoàng Kim Lai Chiềng 2 71.0 1.4% 6 X

145 Hoàng Ngọc Thủy Chiềng 2 6

146 Hoàng Thế Hùng Chiềng 2 6 X

147 Hoàng Văn Huế (Bùi Thị Thảo) Chiềng 2 4

148 Lê Đăng Đông Chiềng 2 4



CAMTHUY’S UREMDP - Annex 1: Summary table of DMS and Compensation plan [Source: Cam Thuy’s DARCB – January, 2018] P a g e | 1 0 0

# Name Village

Land lost

SAHs (Y)

(R) Relocatio

n

No. of HHs

member

Vulnerable HHs (X)


land

Single FHH with

dependents






Forest % of lost

Invalids & Martyrs

Other social policy

149 Lê Đăng Nam Chiềng 2 4

150 Lê Đăng Sáng Chiềng 2 76.7 1.6% 2

151 Lê Thị Bảy Chiềng 2 1.1 0.1% 4 X

152 Lê Văn Viện Chiềng 2 3 X

153 Lê Viết Ngọc Chiềng 2 3

154 Lê Xuân Luận Chiềng 2 4

155 Nguyễn Thị Lâm Chiềng 2 7

156 Nguyễn Thị Quyết Chiềng 2 38.3 1.0% 3 X

157 Nguyễn Văn Hảo Chiềng 2 4

158 Nguyễn Văn Khoa Chiềng 2 7.7 0.3% 5 X

159 Nguyễn Văn Th ớng Chiềng 2 36.7 0.9% 6 X

160 Phạm Bá Đ ng Chiềng 2 95.4 4.2% 5 X

161 Phạm Bá Nhưn Chiềng 2 185.0 4.5% 6 X

162 Phạm Công Lý Chiềng 2 60.1 1.2% 4 X

163 Phạm Đăng C ờng Chiềng 2 53.6 1.7% 4 X

164 Phạm Điện Biên Chiềng 2 77.5 1.4% 3 X

165 Phạm Ngọc Hà Chiềng 2 4 X

166 Phạm Ngọc Nghị Chiềng 2 4

167 Phạm Quốc Hiệp Chiềng 2 3.9 7 X

168 Phạm Thị Định Chiềng 2 100.8 5.3% 2 X

169 Phạm Thị Khoa Chiềng 2 28.1 1.0% 5 X

170 Phạm Thị Liên Chiềng 2 91.7 1.6% 4 X

171 Phạm Thị Xứng Chiềng 2 62.6 4.4% 11 X

172 Phạm Văn C ơng Chiềng 2 4

173 Phạm Văn Hợi Chiềng 2 4 X

174 Phạm Văn Khang Chiềng 2 72.2 1.4% 7 X

175 Phạm Văn Thành Chiềng 2 267.7 6.0% 6 X

176 Phạm Văn Uyên Chiềng 2 124.1 2.4% 4 X

177 Phạm Văn Việt Chiềng 2 101.0 7.7% 7 X

178 Phùng Bá Đại Chiềng 2 6.5 4 X

179 Phùng Bá L ợng Chiềng 2 7.4 4 X




# Name Village

Land lost

SAHs (Y)

(R) Relocatio

n

No. of HHs

member

Vulnerable HHs (X)


land

Single FHH with

dependents






Forest % of lost

Invalids & Martyrs

Other social policy

180 Phùng Bá Quảng Chiềng 2 5.7 4

181 Phùng Bá Sáu Chiềng 2 8.6 4

182 Phùng Bá Thủy Chiềng 2 123.8 12.1% Y 9 X

183 Phùng Thị H ng Chiềng 2 78.7 3.9% 2

184 Tạ Quang Hùng Chiềng 2 4

185 Trần Viết Dũng Chiềng 2 6

186 Tr ơng Công Nông Chiềng 2 12.8 0.5% 4 X

187 Tr ơng Công Thạch Chiềng 2 196.9 9.9% 3 X

188 Tr ơng Công Thanh Chiềng 2 94.9 4.1% 7 X

189 Tr ơng Công Tiên Chiềng 2 69.3 5.3% 3 X

190 Tr ơng Công Tình Chiềng 2 1.1 4 X

191 Tr ơng Thị Toàn Chiềng 2 27.4 0.7% 4

192 Hoàng Thị Nguyệt Chiềng 2 4

193 Phạm Văn Thắng Đông 4 X

194 Phạm Xuân Cảnh Đông 189.3 13.2% Y 4 X X

Cây Xăng Cẩm Thạch

UBND xư Cẩm Thạch 725.7




Annex 1 – Table 4: DMS data of Cam Thanh commune

# Name Village

Land lost

SAHs (Y)

(R) Reloca

tion

No. of HHs

member

Vulnerable HHs (X)


Commune land

Single FHH with

dependents


Social policy HHs

EM HHs



Land for perennial

trees

Aquaculture

Forest % of lost Invalids & Martyrs

Other social policy

Total 9,125.8 2,851.1 22,339.8 2,607.1 773.3 16,670.8 33 879.5 40 7 1,242 10 4 7 3 115 5

1 Bùi Thị Bền Chiềng Trám 9 X X

2 Bùi Trí Trung Chiềng Trám 4

3 Cao Đình Do Chiềng Trám 7

4 Cao Thị Chuyên Chiềng Trám 111.9 124.0 8.1% 4 X X X

5 Cao Thị Lập Chiềng Trám 48.4 5 X

6 Cao Thị Ph ơng Chiềng Trám 4

7 Cao Tr ờng Sơn Chiềng Trám 73.6 4 X

8 Cao Vũ Hải Chiềng Trám 5

9 Đinh Hùng C ờng Chiềng Trám 72.4 2

10 Đinh Thị Bích Chiềng Trám 5

11 Đinh Thị Bình Chiềng Trám 7.1 4 X

12 Đinh Thị Hòa Chiềng Trám 72.6 4 X

13 Đinh Thị Thủy Chiềng Trám 5.8 4

14 Đinh Văn Minh Chiềng Trám 181.0 17.0% Y 5

15 D ơng Minh H ng Chiềng Trám 25.4 5

16 D ơng Thị Dung Chiềng Trám 3

17 D ơng Trần Hanh Chiềng Trám 25.1 6

18 D ơng Văn Đức Chiềng Trám 2

19 D ơng Văn Hà Chiềng Trám 21.7 4

20 Hà Thế Hanh Chiềng Trám 11.9 3 X

21 Hà Thị Tuyến Chiềng Trám 4

22 Hà Văn Tr ờng Chiềng Trám 4

23 Hà Xuân Nam Chiềng Trám 8

24 Hoàng Bình Chung Chiềng Trám 38.6 91.1 1.8% 6

25 Hoàng Thị Hoa Chiềng Trám 14.7 5

26 Lê Đăng Đông Chiềng Trám 11.6 5

27 Lê Đình Hóa Chiềng Trám 24.1 5

28 Lê Mạnh T ởng Chiềng Trám 4




# Name Village

Land lost

SAHs (Y)

(R) Reloca

tion

No. of HHs

member

Vulnerable HHs (X)


Commune land

Single FHH with

dependents


Social policy HHs

EM HHs



Land for perennial

trees

Aquaculture


Other social policy

29 Lê Trọng Nhất Chiềng Trám 3

30 Lê Văn Hữu Chiềng Trám 43.8 5

31 Lê Văn Lợi (Hạnh) Chiềng Trám 4

32 Lê Văn Lợi (Tự) Chiềng Trám 4

33 Lê Văn Lợi Chiềng Trám

34 Lê Văn Thi Chiềng Trám 6

35 Lê Xuân Thanh Chiềng Trám 8

36 Nguyễn Đức Việt Chiềng Trám 5

37 Nguyễn Ngọc Hùng Chiềng Trám 5

38 Nguyễn Ngọc Thận Chiềng Trám 24.1 4

39 Nguyễn Quang Hòa Chiềng Trám 4

40 Nguyễn Quang Phê Chiềng Trám 2

41 Nguyễn Thị H ờng Chiềng Trám 2 X

42 Nguyễn Thị Mai Chiềng Trám 4

43 Nguyễn Thị Nhung Chiềng Trám 4

44 Nguyễn Thị Oanh Chiềng Trám 4 X

45 Nguyễn Thị Ph ơng Chiềng Trám 16.3 3 X

46 Nguyễn Thị Sử Chiềng Trám 3

47 Nguyễn Thị Thoa Chiềng Trám 29.4 4

48 Nguyễn Thị Th Chiềng Trám 4 X

49 Nguyễn Văn Thạch Chiềng Trám 0.9 91.3 7.4% 6

50 Nguyễn Văn Trụ Chiềng Trám 42.2 117.9 9.5% 5 X X

51 Nguyễn Văn Trung Chiềng Trám 5

52 Nguyễn Văn Tuấn Chiềng Trám 46.1 4

53 Phạm Giao Tiên Chiềng Trám 21.1 0.8% 6 X

54 Phạm Minh Th ợng Chiềng Trám 4

55 Phạm Thị Hợp Chiềng Trám 12.6 2 X

56 Phạm Thị Quế Chiềng Trám 4 X X

57 Phạm Tuấn Tr ờng Chiềng Trám 6

58 Phạm Văn Thắng (Vân) Chiềng Trám

9.9

4




# Name Village

Land lost

SAHs (Y)

(R) Reloca

tion

No. of HHs

member

Vulnerable HHs (X)


Commune land

Single FHH with

dependents


Social policy HHs

EM HHs



Land for perennial

trees

Aquaculture


Other social policy

59 Phạm Văn Xuân Chiềng Trám 3.4 141.7 7.2% 3 X

60 Phạm Xuân Hiệp Chiềng Trám 23.2 1.9% 4 X

61 Phan Bá Ngọc Chiềng Trám 4

62 Phùng Bá Chung Chiềng Trám 32.9 4 X

63 Quách Thị Minh Chiềng Trám 4

64 Vũ Viết Cẩm Chiềng Trám 11.2 6

65 Phạm Thị Phi Chiềng Trám 55.3 1.3% 5 X

66 Phạm Bá Hải Chiềng Trám 568.0 16.4% Y 7 X

67 Bùi Quyết Tâm Chiềng Trám 769.5 29.7% Y 6 X

68 Đỗ Thị Liên Chiềng Trám 518.9 23.1% Y 4 X

69 D ơng Thị Dung Chiềng Trám 84.9 11.2% Y 2

70 Phạm Thị H ơng(Xuân) Chiềng Trám 3 X

71 Hà Văn Khanh Chiềng Trám 4 X

72 Hoàng Ngọc Long Chiềng Trám 11.8 0.3% 7

73 Hà Thị Yên (2) Chiềng Trám 41.8 2.6% 4 X

74 Phan Bá Thủy Chiềng Trám 86.3 6.0% 5 X

75 Cao Bằng Thắm Cò Cánh 33.6 1.6% 3 X

76 Cao Minh Chiến Cò Cánh 4

77 Cao Ngọc Thụy Cò Cánh 6.1 0.2% 5 X

78 Cao Thị Thu Hiền Cò Cánh 24.1 29.9 1.1% 4 X

79 Cao Thị Thuận Cò Cánh 3

80 Cao Thị Xuân Cò Cánh 4

81 Cao Văn Đề Cò Cánh 10.9 4 X

82 Cao Văn Điệp Cò Cánh 121.7 15.6% Y 7 X

83 Cao Văn Dũng Cò Cánh 35.6 3 X

84 Cao Văn Huê Cò Cánh 4

85 Cao Văn Thái Cò Cánh 34.8 4 X

86 Cao Văn Tuyền Cò Cánh 78.1 6.3% 4 X

87 D ơng Đình Ph ợng Cò Cánh 14.2 4

88 D ơng Sơn Chung Cò Cánh 15.7 4




# Name Village

Land lost

SAHs (Y)

(R) Reloca

tion

No. of HHs

member

Vulnerable HHs (X)


Commune land

Single FHH with

dependents


Social policy HHs

EM HHs



Land for perennial

trees

Aquaculture


Other social policy

89 D ơng Sơn Quang Cò Cánh 23.5 4 X

90 Hà Mạnh Hùng Cò Cánh 104.0 35.7 1.6% 3 X

91 Hà Tân Ph ơng Cò Cánh 8.6 4 X

92 Hà Thị Dung Cò Cánh 21.3 5 X

93 Hà Thu Tím Cò Cánh 4

94 Hà Văn Hiền Cò Cánh 92.9 9.4% 4

95 Hà Văn Hiền (Dinh) Cò Cánh 3

96 Hà Văn Nội Cò Cánh 28.9 B 4 X

97 Hà Văn Thịnh Cò Cánh 21.8 4 X

98 Hà Văn Thu Cò Cánh 4

99 Hà Văn Tiến Cò Cánh 2.9 4 X

100 Hà Xuân H ng Cò Cánh 149.3 4 X

101 Hà Xuân Quang Cò Cánh 212.3 4.8% 6 X

102 Lê Thị Lý Cò Cánh 88.4 42.9 4.8 2.2% 6 X

103 Lê Thị Quyên Cò Cánh 56.2 1.5% 4 X

104 Bùi Thị Lâm (Lê Văn Phức) Cò Cánh 16.0 4 X

105 Lê Văn Tài Cò Cánh 26.7 5

106 Lê Xuân Tuân Cò Cánh 18.1 6 X

107 L ơng Văn Hải Cò Cánh 237.6 26.4 2.7% 5 X

108 Phạm Phúc Long Cò Cánh 74.5 4 X

109 Phạm Quốc Dân Cò Cánh 58.2 7 X

110 Phạm Quốc Thành Cò Cánh 4

111 Phạm Quốc Tiến Cò Cánh 4

112 Phạm Thị Bình Cò Cánh 17.8 1.3% 5

113 Phạm Thị Công Cò Cánh 46.2 4 X

114 Phạm Thị Dũng Cò Cánh 9.6 7 X

115 Phạm Thị Thảo Cò Cánh 5

116 Phạm Thị Thoa Cò Cánh 12.7 7 X

117 Phạm Thị Thu Cò Cánh 24.8 5 X

118 Phạm Thị Thùy Liên Cò Cánh 8.1 3




# Name Village

Land lost

SAHs (Y)

(R) Reloca

tion

No. of HHs

member

Vulnerable HHs (X)


Commune land

Single FHH with

dependents


Social policy HHs

EM HHs



Land for perennial

trees

Aquaculture


Other social policy

119 Phạm Văn Ngọc Cò Cánh 7

120 Phạm Văn Ph ợng Cò Cánh 149.3 77.9 2.2% 2 X

121 Quách Công C ờng Cò Cánh 3

122 Tạ Thanh Lâm Cò Cánh 119.2 58.9 6.5% 4

123 Tạ Văn Mai Cò Cánh 3

124 Trần Quốc Tuấn Cò Cánh 42.5 4 X

125 Trần Văn Hùng Cò Cánh 137.6 6

126 Trần Văn Miên Cò Cánh 52.3 4.0 0.1% 6

127 Trần Văn Ngân Cò Cánh 78.6 5

128 Trần Văn Nguyệt Cò Cánh 74.9 3 X

129 Trần Xuân Đợi Cò Cánh 133.0 9 X

130 Tr ơng Công Hoan Cò Cánh 23.4 4 X

131 Tr ơng Công Hừng Cò Cánh 52.5 27.0 234.1 6.0% 6 X

132 Tr ơng Công Huy Cò Cánh 30.1 2 X

133 Tr ơng Công Phú Cò Cánh 73.5 2 X

134 Tr ơng Công Sự Cò Cánh 164.1 16.4% Y 3 X

135 Tr ơng Công Vọng Cò Cánh 6

136 Tr ơng Ngọc L ơng Cò Cánh 2.5 4 X

137 Vũ Thế Miên Cò Cánh 4

138 Vũ Thị Hòa Cò Cánh 4

139 Vũ Thị Tần Cò Cánh 122.9 5.2% 3 X

140 Vũ Văn Hùng Cò Cánh 27.7 3

141 Vũ Văn Quyết Cò Cánh 63.4 4 X

142 Bùi Trung Tuyến Cò Cánh 89.8 4.3% 4

143 Cao Thị Xuân Cò Cánh 62.0 4.8% 1 X

144 Cao Thị Thành Cò Cánh 155.4 7.9% 1 X

145 Hà Công Tránh Cò Cánh 139.2 4.3% 6 X

146 Phạm Phúc Khâm Cò Cánh 298.4 5.7% 5 X

147 Phạm Văn Hùng Cò Cánh 5.9 0.1% 3 X

148 Tr ơng Công Khoa Cò Cánh 41.9 1.6% 2 X

149 Phạm Thị Cúc Cò Cánh 117.0 3.6% 6 X




# Name Village

Land lost

SAHs (Y)

(R) Reloca

tion

No. of HHs

member

Vulnerable HHs (X)


Commune land

Single FHH with

dependents


Social policy HHs

EM HHs



Land for perennial

trees

Aquaculture


Other social policy

150 Cao Duy Đành Cò Cánh 54.5 1.3% 6 X

151 Trần Văn Quản Cò Cánh 33.9 0.6% 5

152 Tr ơng Thị Thanh Cò Cánh 12.0 0.5% 4 X

153 Tr ơng Công Sinh Cò Cánh 8.0 0.3% 3 X

154 Tr ơng Công Đức Cò Cánh 22.0 0.9% 4 X

155 Nguyễn Văn Hoán Cò Cánh 78.4 6.1% 5

156 Tạ Thanh Mai Cò Cánh 43.5 0.5% 3

157 Bùi Ngọc Xuyên Én 296.1 5 X

158 Bùi Văn Duyên Én 44.8 1.4% 4 X

159 Bùi Văn Hải Én 162.5 3.7% 4 X

160 Bùi Văn Huấn Én 4

161 Bùi Văn Hùng Én 89.8 4 X

162 Bùi Văn Phong Én 28.7 4 X

163 Bùi Văn Thìn Én 1,778.5 13.4% Y 7 X

164 Bùi Văn Thụ Én 77.5 1.8% 4 X

165 Bùi Văn Th ơng Én 109.2 2.0% 4 X

166 Cao Bằng Chắc Én 34.2 0.8% 3

167 Cao Thị Hiền Én 299.4 47.5 4.5% 3

168 Cao Văn Bút Én 112.7 0.5% 8 X

169 Cao Văn Thủy Én 7.5 0.2% 3 X

170 Hà Thị Đức Én 4

171 Hà Văn Nguyên Én 3,490.0 15.0% Y 7 X

172 Hà Văn Thắng Én 6

173 Hà Xuân Dụng Én 977.4 3.8% 4 X

174 Lê Thị Hằng (Khâm) Én 4

175 Lê Văn Vui Én 144.1 3,992.0 26.0% Y 6 X

176 L ơng Thị Hằng Én 338.3 6.3% 4 X

177 L ơng Văn Chung Én 44.9 4 X

178 Nguyễn Sỹ Quân Én 1,149.6 11.7% Y 5

179 Phạm Đăng Dung Én 633.4 8.5% 4 X

180 Phạm Phúc Tuyên Én 2,463.5 17.3% Y 4 X




# Name Village

Land lost

SAHs (Y)

(R) Reloca

tion

No. of HHs

member

Vulnerable HHs (X)


Commune land

Single FHH with

dependents


Social policy HHs

EM HHs



Land for perennial

trees

Aquaculture


Other social policy

181 Phạm Văn Lâm Én 38.5 5 X

182 Phạm Văn Ly Én 22.4 1,306.7 11.7% Y 5 X

183 Phạm Văn Minh (A) Én 2.1 0.0% 4 X

184 Phạm Văn Minh Én 418.1 7.3% 4

185 Phạm Văn Nhật Én 494.7 5.6% 4 X

186 Phạm Văn Tâm Én 148.1 710.8 3.3% 4 X

187 Phạm Văn Thắng Én 23.5 4 X

188 Phạm Văn Tình Én 103.2 141.2 Y R 4 X

189 Trần Văn Đình Én 39.1 244.1 5.2% 4 X

190 Trần Văn Thái (Mông) Én 4

191 Trần Văn Tuấn Én 4

192 Bùi Quang Thụ Thành Long 1 32.3 59.3 4

193 Bùi Quốc Hậu Thành Long 1 9.6 4

194 Bùi Thị Chinh Thành Long 1 100.0 188.5 188.5 5.5% 4 X

195 Cao Thị Dậu Thành Long 1 245.6 4

196 Đặng Ngọc Toản Thành Long 1 269.1 61.8 4

197 Đặng Thị Mai Thành Long 1 400.4 157.8 8.5% 6 X X

198 Đỗ Văn C ơng Thành Long 1 1.0 5

199 Đỗ Văn Xuyên Thành Long 1 158.0 Y R 4 X

200 Đỗ Xuân Cần Thành Long 1 6

201 D ơng Thị Thanh Thành Long 1 4.0 403.4 12.8% Y 5

202 Hà Thị Hiền Thành Long 1 163.6 B 5

203 Hà Thị Nga Thành Long 1 44.4 4

204 Hà Thị Ngân Thành Long 1 81.8 4

205 Hà Thị Tĩnh Thành Long 1 19.6 B 2

206 Hà Thị Yên Thành Long 1 83.1 3

207 Hà Thọ Mai Thành Long 1 208.0 4

208 Hà Văn Dũng Thành Long 1 106.5 1.4% 4

209 Hà Văn Thanh Thành Long 1 540.0 B 8 X

210 Hoàng Thị H ng Thành Long 1 84.2 Y R 4

211 Lê Khắc Hòa Thành Long 1 116.4 3




# Name Village

Land lost

SAHs (Y)

(R) Reloca

tion

No. of HHs

member

Vulnerable HHs (X)


Commune land

Single FHH with

dependents


Social policy HHs

EM HHs



Land for perennial

trees

Aquaculture


Other social policy

212 Lê Thị Thúy Thành Long 1 144.4 4

213 Lê Tr ờng Sơn Thành Long 1 165.9 Y R 4

214 Lê Văn Mến Thành Long 1 20.4 Y R 4

215 Lê Văn Thanh Thành Long 1 6.0 109.7 0.7% 4

216 Lê Việt Hùng Thành Long 1 26.0 310.3 110.1 29.6% Y 5 X

217 Mai Xuân Tiến Thành Long 1 371.4 33.0% Y 6 X

218 Ngô Văn Dung Thành Long 1 6.1 4

219 Nguyễn Đăng Khoa Thành Long 1 166.5 448.9 10.2% Y 7 X

220 Nguyễn Quốc Đức Thành Long 1 406.2 4

221 Nguyễn Thị Sáu Thành Long 1 26.1 4 X

222 Nguyễn Trọng Huy Thành Long 1 60.0 41.6 4

223 Nguyễn Văn Chi Thành Long 1 31.5 105.0 2.3% B 6 X

224 Nguyễn Văn Hào Thành Long 1 42.4 6

225 Nguyễn Văn Lễ Thành Long 1 8.3 4

226 Nguyễn Văn Sơn Thành Long 1 4.8 91.3 2.6% 4

227 Nguyễn Văn Vĩnh Thành Long 1 4.7 4

228 Phạm Minh Hải Thành Long 1 196.3 4 X

229 Phạm Thanh Hà Thành Long 1 95.1 4 X

230 Phan Thị Lâm Thành Long 1 31.3 4 X

231 Phùng Thị H ng Thành Long 1 378.6 4

232 Tô Văn An Thành Long 1 200.0 167.3 Y R 5 X

233 Trần Tuấn Phán Thành Long 1 333.8 B 6 X

234 Trịnh Đình Tâm Thành Long 1 665.5 4

235 Trịnh Đình Trung Thành Long 1 441.8 4 X

236 Trịnh Văn Khải Thành Long 1 119.6 5

237 Tr ơng Công Tâm Thành Long 1 94.1 210.1 9.9% 5 X

238 Phạm Văn Bằng Thành Long 1 556.1 27.9% Y 6 X

239 Lê Kim Nghìn Thành Long 1 575.1 74.1% Y 5 X X

240 Lê Văn Lợi Thành Long 1 322.6 Y R 6 X

241 Tô Thị Lộc Thành Long 1 5

242 Bùi Thị Lục Thành Long 1 1,151.6 29.7% Y 6 X




# Name Village

Land lost

SAHs (Y)

(R) Reloca

tion

No. of HHs

member

Vulnerable HHs (X)


Commune land

Single FHH with

dependents


Social policy HHs

EM HHs



Land for perennial

trees

Aquaculture


Other social policy

243 Vũ Anh Muôn Thành Long 1 245.5 15.0% Y 4 X

244 Nguyễn Thị Hà Thành Long 1 350.2 39.8% Y 4

245 Hà Ngọc D ơng Thành Long 1 165.6 4.1% 4 X

246 Tr ơng Công Doanh Thành Long 1 161.7 34.7% Y 5 X X

247 Vũ Thị Thanh Thành Long 1 1.9 0.0% 5

248 Hoàng Thị Dần Thành Long 1 152.6 2.9% 2 X

249 Quách Thị H ơng Thành Long 1 5 X

250 Hà Văn Phú Thành Long 1 202.0 7.1% 3

251 Cao Tr ơng Giang Thành Long 1 331.9 9.8% 4 X

252 Trần Văn Nậu Thành Long 1 4

253 Cao Bá Quyết Thành Long 1 153.2 4.7% 4 X

254 Nguyễn Văn Quý Thành Long 1 517.7 76.8% Y 4

255 Cao Bằng Mạnh Thành Long 1 590.3 80.4% Y 5 X

256 Hà Minh Duyên Thành Long 1 5 X X

257 Nguyễn Văn Bảo Thành Long 1 4

258 Nguyễn Thị Chí Thành Long 1 3

259 Lê Đức Hiệu Thành Long 1 124.3 12.9% Y 5

260 Tr ơng Văn C ơng Thành Long 1 199.4 17.1% Y 5 X

261 Tr ơng Văn Xuân Thành Long 1 210.9 59.1% Y 5 X

262 Hoàng Khắc Đức Thành Long 1 100.5 38.8% Y 5

263 Hà Mạnh C ờng Thành Long 1 338.4 22.5% Y 4

264 Tr ơng Công Tuyết Thành Long 1 599.8 126.5 6.8% 5 X

265 Tr ơng Công Lý Thành Long 1 437.8 56.2% Y 4

266 Nguyễn Đình Lập Thành Long 1 159.2 4.6% 5

267 Hà Văn Nh Thành Long 1 172.3 5.2% 6

268 Nguyễn Mạnh Hùng Thành Long 1 3

269 L u Văn Sáng Thành Long 1 5

270 Nguyễn Văn Tuyến Thành Long 1 2

271 Quách Công Định Thành Long 1 235.9 151.8 52.7 6.9% 2 X

272 Hoàng Thị Nga Thành Long 1 14.0 55.5 4

273 Đỗ Xuân Thịnh Thành Long 2 3




# Name Village

Land lost

SAHs (Y)

(R) Reloca

tion

No. of HHs

member

Vulnerable HHs (X)


Commune land

Single FHH with

dependents


Social policy HHs

EM HHs



Land for perennial

trees

Aquaculture


Other social policy

274 Trần Văn Chúc Thành Long 2 6

275 Nguyễn Quốc Sơn Thành Long 1 4

276 Bùi Văn Quân (Phạm Thị Hinh) Én 77.5 1.8 0.0% 3

277 Hà Văn Để Chiềng Trám 5

278 Phạm Thị H ng Chiềng Trám 32.6 2

279 Lê Hải L u Thành Long 2 3,508.7 15.2% Y 2

280 Phạm Văn Hoạt Thành Long 2 2.8 0.1% 4

281 Phạm Văn Thanh Thành Long 2 2,327.5 18.3% Y 3

282 Lê Thị Hoa Thành Long 1 4

283 Nguyễn Đăng Ngọc Thành Long 1 100.0 157.9 1.6% 3

284 Lê Thị Ngà Thành Long 1 100.0 1,190.1 8.3% 5

285 Nguyễn Thị Nga Thành Long 1 100.0 18.6 0.4% 2

286 Nguyễn Đăng Tuất Thành Long 1 100.0 115.3 1.3% 2

287 Nguyễn Thị Dân Thành Long 1 144.3 4

Trạm y tế xư Cẩm Thành Chiềng Trám

Tr ờng MN xư Cẩm Thành Chiềng Trám

Tr ờng THCS xư Cẩm Thành Chiềng Trám

UBND xư Cẩm Thành 879.5




Annex 1 - Table 5: Summary compensation plan of Cam Thuy town

No. Name

Compensation Allowances

Total Residential

Land Agricultural

Land House and structures

Trees and Crops

Job training and change of vocation

Allowance for Garden &

Aquaculture land

Provision of life stabilization assistance

Allowance for vulnerable HHs

Assistance for relocated AHs

Bonus for hand -over ontime

Total 16,842,271,200 2,854,300 19,848,918,459 284,106,000 4,281,450 586,589,400 261,360,000 23,000,000 1,486,000,000 78,500,000 39,417,880,809

1 C Huy Thảo (Vũ Thị Hiền) 812,706,300 201,761,952 0 259,136,850 4,320,000 63,000,000 1,000,000 1,341,925,102

2 C Văn Thanh 815,826,800 531,224,656 21,373,500 126,326,600 7,560,000 63,000,000 1,000,000 1,566,311,556

3 Cù Văn Lý 793,800,000 265,958,628 3,127,500 3,240,000 63,000,000 1,000,000 1,130,126,128

4 Đỗ Quốc Hòa 23,100,000 2,718,000 140,500 0 500,000 26,458,500

5 Đỗ Văn Vinh 540,283,900 1,242,297,410 0 37,433,050 4,320,000 63,000,000 1,000,000 1,888,334,360

6 Đoàn Thị Huyền 54,180,000 192,850,010 102,000 3,240,000 1,000,000 11,000,000 1,000,000 263,372,010

7 L u Thị Chi (Nguyễn Văn Phong) 372,540,000 78,163,830 2,126,500 3,240,000 63,000,000 1,000,000 520,070,330

8 Mai Thế Hoạt 249,480,000 149,304,796 2,164,500 0 500,000 401,449,296

9 Nguyễn Công Khanh 5,400,000 62,418,140 405,500 0 500,000 68,723,640

10 Nguyễn Đăng Chuyên 184,500,000 280,249,766 39,000 5,400,000 11,000,000 1,000,000 482,188,766

11 Nguyễn Đức Thủy 131,880,000 195,485,096 0 4,320,000 11,000,000 1,000,000 343,685,096

12 Nguyễn Ngọc Ánh 171,360,000 231,138,193 5,975,000 6,480,000 11,000,000 1,000,000 426,953,193

13 Nguyễn Tác L 78,120,000 75,384,848 326,000 0 500,000 154,330,848

14 Nguyễn Thế Hùng 113,400,000 746,229,378 1,343,500 7,560,000 11,000,000 1,000,000 880,532,878

15 Nguyễn Thị Mùi 567,420,000 0 0 7,560,000 52,000,000 1,000,000 627,980,000

16 Nguyễn Thị Tâm 166,740,000 226,653,712 340,000 6,480,000 11,000,000 1,000,000 412,213,712

17 Nguyễn Thị Thơm 97,440,000 50,164,030 0 4,320,000 63,000,000 1,000,000 215,924,030

18 Nguyễn Văn Giang 778,771,800 1,150,081,215 152,000 12,104,100 7,560,000 63,000,000 1,000,000 2,012,669,115

19 Nguyễn Văn Thành 118,440,000 369,078,498 0 5,400,000 11,000,000 1,000,000 504,918,498

20 Nguyễn Xuân Huy 86,100,000 166,236,768 370,500 5,400,000 11,000,000 1,000,000 270,107,268

21 Nguyễn Xuân Minh 32,880,000 53,348,300 939,000 0 500,000 87,667,300

22 Phạm Văn Tới 614,880,000 749,649,994 3,341,000 5,400,000 11,000,000 1,000,000 1,385,270,994

23 Trần Cảnh Hùng 201,760,000 295,080,100 819,000 0 500,000 498,159,100

24 Tr ơng Thế Minh 174,720,000 312,343,700 0 4,320,000 63,000,000 1,000,000 555,383,700

25 Tr ơng Thị Viên (Nguyễn Văn An)

91,800,000 348,149,700 351,500 4,320,000 1,000,000 11,000,000 1,000,000 457,621,200

26 Bùi Văn Đạo (Phạm Thị Tập) 41,840,000 10,406,000 2,895,500 1,000,000 0 500,000 56,641,500

27 Cao Ngọc Chính 441,840,000 207,013,646 4,973,500 3,240,000 11,000,000 1,000,000 669,067,146




No. Name


Total Residential

Land Agricultural


Trees and Crops



Aquaculture land





28 Cao Ngọc Sơn (Lê Thị Thảo) 916,480,000 6,885,000 11,844,500 3,240,000 11,000,000 1,000,000 950,449,500

29 Cao Thị Thu (Trần Minh L ơng) 64,800,000 104,336,090 6,647,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 177,283,090

30 Lê Thị Toan (Ngô Văn Chung)

14,800,000 243,607,650 4,320,000 11,000,000 1,000,000 274,727,650

31 Lê Văn Thìn (Ngô Thị Xâm)

62,560,000 77,597,660 2,175,500 6,480,000 11,000,000 1,000,000 160,813,160

32 L u Văn Lan (Lê Thị Sữu) 120,000,000 177,210,070 2,607,000 3,240,000 11,000,000 1,000,000 315,057,070

33 Nguyễn Đăng Khoa (Phạm Thị Tuấn) 6,582,400 86,141,240 11,980,500 151,588,800 3,240,000 11,000,000 1,000,000 271,532,940

34 Nguyễn Hữu Nam (Lê Thị Mai)

43,840,000 28,604,580 350,000 0 500,000 73,294,580

35 Phạm Thị Hoài (Lê Văn Hùng) 45,040,000 166,713,290 8,640,000 1,000,000 63,000,000 1,000,000 285,393,290

36 Trần Đức Kinh (Lê Thị Phúc)

245,120,000 2,854,300 372,410,478 9,014,500 4,281,450 17,280,000 63,000,000 1,000,000 714,960,728

37 Trần Minh Kh ơng (Bùi Thị Cúc) 85,120,000 140,365,640 5,633,500 3,240,000 63,000,000 1,000,000 298,359,140

38 Trần Thị Mai (Trịnh Văn Chung)

71,760,000 4,320,000 63,000,000 1,000,000 140,080,000

39 Trần Thị Nhàn (Lê Minh Hải) 26,880,000 186,932,000 6,480,000 11,000,000 1,000,000 232,292,000

40 Trần Thị Sự (Phạm Bằng Hữu) 17,600,000 7,096,200 2,818,000 0 500,000 28,014,200

41 Trần Văn Lâm (Vũ Thị Thu Hiền) 82,800,000 123,930,000 5,400,000 63,000,000 1,000,000 276,130,000

42 Bùi Kim Trọng 39,898,360 721,500 0 40,619,860

43 Bùi Thị Hợp (Bùi H ng Liên) 194,240,000 2,491,000 0 500,000 197,231,000

44 Bùi Thị Quý (Phạm Đình Chung) 42,199,660 854,000 0 43,053,660

45 Bùi Thị Th ơng (Phạm Ba Duy) 3,648,200 0 0 3,648,200

46 Bùi Thị Thùy (Đặng Tiến Hội) 1,022,500 0 0 1,022,500

47 Bùi Th ợng Hải 29,320,100 516,000 0 29,836,100

48 Cao Văn Mạnh 41,743,400 0 0 41,743,400

49 Đặng Tiến Bảy 4,160,000 0 0 0 500,000 4,660,000




No. Name


Total Residential

Land Agricultural


Trees and Crops



Aquaculture land





50 Đinh Trọng Tiến 52,800,000 34,588,556 2,817,000 0 500,000 90,705,556

51 Đỗ Thị Chính 3,696,000 638,000 0 4,334,000

52 Đoàn Bá Ri 99,854,480 42,000 0 99,896,480

53 Hà Mạnh Phú 6,245,150 676,000 0 6,921,150

54 Hà Mạnh Ph ớc (Hoàng Thị H ng) 17,002,270 197,000 0 17,199,270

55 Hoàng Ngọc Cẩm 7,196,860 0 0 7,196,860

56 Hoàng Thị Hoa (Nguyễn Văn Bản) 40,049,300 0 0 40,049,300

57 Hoàng Thị Loan (Trần Văn Quyết) 6,378,380 872,000 0 7,250,380

58 Hoàng Văn Long ( Hoàng Th Trung) 64,320,000 0 0 0 500,000 64,820,000

59 Lê Anh Cúc 74,240,000 104,416,696 4,489,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 184,645,696

60 Lê Anh Thái 17,280,000 291,996,960 4,466,500 9,720,000 11,000,000 1,000,000 335,463,460

61 Lê Anh Tuấn 0 3,912,950 2,895,500 0 6,808,450

62 Lê Bá Hoàng 9,920,000 4,823,900 216,000 0 500,000 15,459,900

63 Lê Đăng Thao 711,680,000 1,220,436,031 260,000 5,400,000 11,000,000 1,000,000 1,949,776,031

64 Lê Thị Hà (Đ ng Sỹ Thủy) 185,280,000 155,679,337 6,720,500 1,000,000 0 500,000 349,179,837

65 Lê Thị Mành 181,272,150 954,000 11,000,000 193,226,150

66 Lê Thị Ngọc 31,945,340 3,994,000 0 35,939,340

67 Lê Văn Hoàng 14,720,000 0 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 16,220,000

68 Lê Văn Phụng 0 17,030,000 0 0 17,030,000

69 Lê Văn Sáu 71,680,000 266,219,175 0 4,320,000 11,000,000 1,000,000 354,219,175

70 Lê Văn Tình 6,720,000 617,800,590 200,000 6,480,000 11,000,000 1,000,000 643,200,590

71 Lê Viết Hoan 15,360,000 0 1,681,000 0 500,000 17,541,000

72 L u Anh Thắng (Nguyễn Tân) 0 1,955,700 1,409,000 0 3,364,700

73 L u Quyết Tiến 521,920,000 223,211,000 6,963,000 3,240,000 1,000,000 63,000,000 1,000,000 820,334,000

74 L u Thanh Hóa 967,040,000 836,670,400 10,307,000 6,480,000 1,000,000 63,000,000 1,000,000 1,885,497,400

75 L u Văn Sỹ 194,560,000 199,454,170 2,720,000 5,400,000 63,000,000 1,000,000 466,134,170

76 Ngô Ngọc Tú 0 13,556,400 0 0 13,556,400

77 Ngô Quang Tám 7,360,000 248,989,554 1,922,500 5,400,000 11,000,000 1,000,000 275,672,054

78 Ngô Quang Thủy 39,680,000 70,305,950 1,848,500 0 500,000 112,334,450




No. Name


Total Residential

Land Agricultural


Trees and Crops



Aquaculture land





79 Ngô Quang Trung 10,192,200 676,000 0 10,868,200

80 Ngô Quang Tuấn 50,616,520 0 0 50,616,520

81 Ngô Quang V ơng 13,378,250 907,000 0 14,285,250

82 Ngô Thanh Tuân 13,922,470 1,740,000 0 15,662,470

83 Ngô Thị Kim Sơn 558,720,000 118,779,250 7,822,000 2,160,000 11,000,000 1,000,000 699,481,250

84 Ngô Văn Bảy 6,720,000 0 0 0 500,000 7,220,000

85 Ngô Văn Khánh 17,269,050 1,192,000 0 18,461,050

86 Ngô Văn Long (D ơng) 1,233,000 0 0 1,233,000

87 Ngô Văn Long (Tuyết) 30,914,000 326,000 0 31,240,000

88 Ngô Văn Quý 533,900 5,702,000 0 6,235,900

89 Ngô Văn Tuấn 13,715,613 123,500 0 13,839,113

90 Nguyễn Anh Tuấn 64,960,000 266,681,070 9,815,500 3,240,000 11,000,000 1,000,000 356,696,570

91 Nguyễn Bá Hùng 19,200,000 8,367,960 145,000 0 500,000 28,212,960

92 Nguyễn Bá Sáu 28,480,000 2,312,500 1,026,000 0 500,000 32,318,500

93 Nguyễn Hoành Sơn 5,792,000 645,000 0 500,000 6,937,000

94 Nguyễn Hữu Khoa 3,200,000 0 1,056,000 0 500,000 4,756,000

95 Nguyễn Minh Kỳ 90,240,000 66,099,220 1,154,500 0 500,000 157,993,720

96 Nguyễn Ngọc Luyến 84,160,000 104,923,750 680,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 191,263,750

97 Nguyễn Nhật Tân 66,240,000 15,152,050 2,133,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 85,025,050

98 Nguyễn Sóng Hải 4,375,400 370,000 0 4,745,400

99 Nguyễn Tất Tiến 88,640,000 21,721,495 2,413,000 0 500,000 113,274,495

100 Nguyễn Thế Sỹ 9,170,020 210,000 0 9,380,020

101 Nguyễn Thị Bình 1,600,000 0 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 3,100,000

102 Nguyễn Thị Chế 26,507,290 10,334,000 0 36,841,290

103 Nguyễn Thị Hằng 177,280,000 997,467,000 780,000 4,320,000 11,000,000 1,000,000 1,191,847,000

104 Nguyễn Thị Hợi 3,200,000 0 0 0 500,000 3,700,000

105 Nguyễn Thị H ng 4,480,000 21,390,000 914,500 1,000,000 0 500,000 28,284,500

106 Nguyễn Thị H ờng 3,406,000 1,322,000 0 4,728,000

107 Nguyễn Thị Loan 960,000 70,153,848 118,000 0 500,000 71,731,848

108 Nguyễn Thị Minh 21,922,580 1,707,000 0 23,629,580

109 Nguyễn Thị Nga 2,480,000 3,809,850 3,048,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 10,837,850




No. Name


Total Residential

Land Agricultural


Trees and Crops



Aquaculture land





110 Nguyễn Thị Nho 1,703,350 1,169,000 0 2,872,350

111 Nguyễn Thị Tuyết 212,480,000 134,824,832 1,959,000 4,320,000 11,000,000 1,000,000 365,583,832

112 Nguyễn Văn Bình 24,960,000 22,341,000 0 0 500,000 47,801,000

113 Nguyễn Văn Chính 11,200,000 0 0 0 500,000 11,700,000

114 Nguyễn Văn Đức 19,949,080 0 0 19,949,080

115 Nguyễn Văn Hùng (Quyên)

120,320,000 137,564,490 622,000 4,320,000 11,000,000 1,000,000 274,826,490

116 Nguyễn Văn Hùng (Tình)

16,640,000 40,683,123 1,584,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 60,407,123

117 Nguyễn Văn Linh 40,960,000 0 0 0 500,000 41,460,000

118 Nguyễn Văn Luyện 5,947,500 0 0 5,947,500

119 Nguyễn Văn Nhân 438,565,120 4,489,000 11,000,000 1,000,000 455,054,120

120 Nguyễn Văn Quy 53,120,000 21,178,000 400,000 0 500,000 75,198,000

121 Nguyễn Văn Tám 99,200,000 7,285,000 622,000 0 500,000 107,607,000

122 Nguyễn Văn Thơ 320,000 41,313,270 980,000 0 500,000 43,113,270

123 Nguyễn Văn Việt 154,560,000 253,111,010 0 5,400,000 63,000,000 1,000,000 477,071,010

124 Ninh Công Hiếu 22,433,530 0 0 22,433,530

125 Ninh Công Hòa 1,062,500 1,945,000 0 3,007,500

126 Ninh Công Minh 2,039,100 130,000 0 2,169,100

127 Phạm Mạnh Tuấn 159,040,000 35,503,018 3,326,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 199,369,018

128 Phạm Minh Châm 4,107,350 343,000 0 4,450,350

129 Phạm Minh Chí 194,790,880 402,000 11,000,000 1,000,000 207,192,880

130 Phạm Thị Dung 97,280,000 0 0 0 500,000 97,780,000

131 Phạm Thị Duyên 56,960,000 0 0 0 500,000 57,460,000

132 Phạm Thị Thành (Nguyễn Văn Sởi) 4,480,000 7,095,238 2,233,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 15,308,238

133 Phạm Thị Trang 65,600,000 5,750,000 1,600,000 0 500,000 73,450,000

134 Phạm Thùy Dung 83,200,000 0 400,000 0 500,000 84,100,000

135 Phạm Trọng Nam 192,640,000 355,047,194 5,657,500 5,400,000 11,000,000 1,000,000 570,744,694

136 Phạm Văn Điệp 113,920,000 87,087,825 780,000 0 500,000 202,287,825

137 Phạm Văn Nhạc 1,147,500 1,130,500 0 2,278,000

138 Phạm Văn Tài 157,760,000 126,677,440 5,703,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 291,640,440

139 Tạ Quang Hùng 1,487,500 1,767,000 0 3,254,500




No. Name


Total Residential

Land Agricultural


Trees and Crops



Aquaculture land





140 Tạ Quang Sơn 60,809,430 660,000 0 61,469,430

141 Tạ Thị Liên 1,195,950 264,000 0 1,459,950

142 Trần Đình V ợng 179,840,000 36,060,570 1,917,000 0 500,000 218,317,570

143 Trần Quang Định 106,240,000 59,110,500 468,000 0 500,000 166,318,500

144 Trần Thị Lan 52,160,000 6,300,900 233,000 0 500,000 59,193,900

145 Trần Thị ớc (Nguyễn Văn Năm) 77,120,000 21,704,650 336,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 100,660,650

146 Trần Vinh Thủy 101,760,000 143,086,204 1,657,000 0 500,000 247,003,204

147 Trịnh Hùng Thủy 15,721,940 281,500 0 16,003,440

148 Trịnh Thị Dung 96,000,000 16,696,900 9,548,000 0 500,000 122,744,900

149 Trịnh Thị Giang 2,328,000 340,000 0 2,668,000

150 Trịnh Thị Ngọc 37,440,000 341,014,010 1,465,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 381,419,010

151 Trịnh Thị Tú 3,200,000 0 0 0 500,000 3,700,000

152 Trịnh Văn Truyền 7,568,400 837,000 0 8,405,400

153 Tr ơng Anh Dũng 6,414,240 183,500 0 6,597,740

154 Tr ơng Công Kiếm 367,360,000 307,558,120 2,508,500 6,480,000 1,000,000 11,000,000 1,000,000 696,906,620

155 Tr ơng Thị Mùi (Phạm Văn Thành) 238,400,000 110,166,208 2,677,000 9,720,000 1,000,000 11,000,000 1,000,000 373,963,208

156 Vũ Thị Lệ 30,958,339 330,000 0 31,288,339

157 Vũ Văn Nhớ 2,164,400 0 0 2,164,400

158 Vũ Văn Tân 13,818,780 1,551,500 0 15,370,280




Annex 1 - Table 6: Summary compensation plan of Cam Binh commune

No. Name


Total Residential Land

Agricultural Land

Public land House and structures

Trees and Crops

Job training and change of

vocation


Aquaculture land



Assistance for relocated

AHs

Bonus for hand-over

ontime

Total 9,084,140,000 606,502,900 115,062,500 8,583,076,024 477,632,110 909,754,350 1,615,115,250 46,440,000 157,000,000 63,000,000 173,000,000 21,830,723,134

1 Bàn H ng Nguyên 1,463,000 188,100 2,194,500 1,000,000 0 500,000 5,345,600

2 Bàn Thị Bình 861,000 110,700 1,291,500 1,000,000 0 3,263,200

3 Bàn Văn Khoa 1,687,000 216,900 2,530,500 1,000,000 0 500,000 5,934,400

4 Bàn Văn L ợng 2,404,500 309,150 3,606,750 1,000,000 0 500,000 7,820,400

5 D ơng Kim Khang 1,480,500 190,350 2,220,750 1,000,000 0 500,000 5,391,600

6 Phạm Thị Nâu 1,596,000 205,200 2,394,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 5,695,200

7 Triệu Hùng Liêu 1,585,500 203,850 2,378,250 1,000,000 0 5,167,600

8 Triệu Văn Chinh 3,864,000 496,800 5,796,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 11,656,800

9 Triệu Thị Minh 994,000 127,800 1,491,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 4,112,800

10 Triệu Văn Bằng 1,981,000 254,700 2,971,500 1,000,000 0 500,000 6,707,200

11 Triệu Văn Nguyên 583,000 17,550 874,500 1,000,000 0 500,000 2,975,050

12 Triệu Văn Phúc 2,142,000 275,400 3,213,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 7,130,400

13 Triệu Văn Quảng 1,120,000 144,000 1,680,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 4,444,000

14 Triệu Văn Sinh 1,869,000 240,300 2,803,500 1,000,000 0 500,000 6,412,800

15 Triệu Văn Thành (Lan) 2,751,000 353,700 4,126,500 1,000,000 0 500,000 8,731,200

16 Bàn Tài V ợng 3,041,500 0 391,050 4,562,250 1,000,000 0 500,000 9,494,800

17 Bàn Thị Hạnh 174,240,000 0 10,106,050 698,500 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 186,544,550

18 Bàn Thị Vui 65,040,000 0 0 10,000 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 66,550,000

19 Bàn Văn Báo 48,960,000 259,000 2,970,100 671,300 388,500 1,000,000 0 500,000 54,748,900

20 Bàn Văn Chung 0 0 186,094,588 1,472,000 0 0 187,566,588

21 Bàn Văn C ờng 0 0 7,049,500 0 0 0 7,049,500

22 Bàn Văn Du 5,985,000 0 769,500 8,977,500 1,000,000 0 500,000 17,232,000

23 Bàn Văn Đức 9,114,000 0 1,171,800 13,671,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 25,456,800

24 Bàn Văn Hanh 99,120,000 0 4,670,200 373,000 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 105,663,200

25 Bàn Văn Hạnh (Phùng Sinh Thắng) 37,680,000 0 4,160,500 468,000 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 43,808,500

26 Bàn Văn Hoan 1,004,500 0 129,150 1,506,750 1,000,000 0 500,000 4,140,400

27 Bàn Văn Hoàng 0 0 3,674,880 375,000 0 0 4,049,880

28 Bàn Văn Học 0 0 3,380,450 468,000 0 0 3,848,450

29 Bàn Văn H ng 3,090,500 0 397,350 4,635,750 1,000,000 0 500,000 9,623,600




No. Name



Agricultural Land


Trees and Crops


vocation


Aquaculture land




AHs

Bonus for hand-over

ontime

(Bàn Thị Bình)

30 Bàn Văn H ng (Triệu Thị H ng) 0 0 7,086,750 120,000 0 0 7,206,750

31 Bàn Văn H ng (Triệu Thị Tiên) 0 0 2,593,500 333,500 0 0 2,927,000

32 Bàn Văn Hùng 0 0 6,403,000 786,500 0 0 7,189,500

33 Bàn Văn H ng 102,480,000 0 50,289,480 0 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 154,269,480

34 Bàn Văn Liên 2,173,500 0 279,450 3,260,250 1,000,000 0 500,000 7,213,200

35 Bàn Văn Long 0 0 3,350,500 0 0 0 3,350,500

36 Bàn Văn Mạnh 0 0 1,882,100 25,000 0 0 1,907,100

37 Bàn Văn Minh 24,500 0 3,150 36,750 1,000,000 0 500,000 1,564,400

38 Bàn Văn Thái 0 0 46,927,280 0 0 0 46,927,280

39 Bàn Văn Thắng 0 0 10,780,450 373,000 0 0 11,153,450

40 Bàn Văn Thanh 0 0 3,170,380 0 0 0 3,170,380

41 Bàn Văn Thành 90,720,000 0 1,365,000 1,525,000 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 95,110,000

42 Bàn Văn Thành 0 0 5,634,250 740,000 0 0 6,374,250

43 Bàn Văn Thành (Phùng Văn Dung) 107,520,000 0 31,641,870 349,500 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 141,011,370

44 Bàn Văn Viện 0 0 42,848,620 190,000 0 0 43,038,620

45 Đào Văn Sơn (Bàn Thị Hạnh) 0 0 5,187,000 0 0 0 5,187,000

46 D ơng Thị Đức 2,747,500 2,747,500 0 353,250 4,121,250 1,000,000 0 500,000 11,469,500

47 D ơng Văn Bình (Cao Thị Nhân)

47,280,000 0 6,910,250 0 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 55,690,250

48 D ơng Văn Hải 25,200,000 1,431,500 9,287,540 184,050 2,147,250 1,000,000 0 500,000 39,750,340

49 D ơng Văn Minh 0 6,273,100 2,733,000 0 0 9,006,100

50 D ơng Văn Quang 161,520,000 0 7,889,600 1,900,000 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 172,809,600

51 D ơng Văn Thắng 0 37,940,372 1,270,000 0 0 39,210,372

52 D ơng Văn Thanh 784,000 30,150,128 100,800 1,176,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 33,710,928

53 D ơng Văn Thành (Thân)

1,890,000 0 243,000 2,835,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 6,468,000

54 Nguyễn Đức Long 0 78,750,670 110,000 0 0 78,860,670

55 Nguyễn Thị Mai 0 2,519,400 0 0 0 2,519,400

56 Nguyễn Thị Ngân 10,080,000 0 0 0 500,000 10,580,000

57 Nguyễn Tuấn Sinh 7,920,000 0 0 0 500,000 8,420,000




No. Name



Agricultural Land


Trees and Crops


vocation


Aquaculture land




AHs

Bonus for hand-over

ontime

58 Nguyễn Văn Huấn (D ơng Thị Oánh) 0 8,148,600 578,500 0 0 8,727,100

59 Nguyễn Văn Huệ 331,200,000 0 14,061,700 2,347,000 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 349,108,700

60 Nguyễn Xuân Hiền 82,800,000 0 55,448,252 0 0 0 500,000 138,748,252

61 Phùng Hạnh Long 120,804,100 0 55,995,220 2,651,500 0 57,357,950 1,000,000 0 500,000 238,308,770

62 Phùng Sinh Chung 20,400,000 0 2,491,890 1,321,000 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 25,712,890

63 Phùng Sinh Hòa 0 7,030,200 650,500 0 0 7,680,700

64 Phùng Sinh Hoàng 0 758,400 851,000 0 0 1,609,400

65 Phùng Sinh Nghĩa 8,880,000 857,500 3,107,500 1,412,250 1,286,250 1,000,000 0 500,000 17,043,500

66 Phùng Sinh Ngọc 83,040,000 0 7,289,630 1,215,500 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 93,045,130

67 Phùng Sinh Phong 100,560,000 0 4,085,870 1,082,000 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 107,227,870

68 Phùng Sinh Phú 71,280,000 0 4,667,000 1,170,000 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 78,617,000

69 Phùng Sinh Phúc 0 0 128,364,460 336,000 0 0 128,700,460

70 Phùng Sinh Tiến 2,093,000 0 269,100 3,139,500 1,000,000 0 500,000 7,001,600

71 Phùng Thị Cơ 22,320,000 0 6,702,900 0 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 30,522,900

72 Phùng Thị H ng 0 0 2,772,960 1,239,000 0 0 4,011,960

73 Phùng Thị Tâm 23,280,000 0 176,000 482,500 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 25,438,500

74 Phùng Văn Hải 0 0 111,464,000 0 0 0 111,464,000

75 Phùng Văn Linh (Lê Thị Thảo) 0 0 101,723,250 61,000 0 0 101,784,250

76 Phùng Văn Nghim 1,460,300 0 6,854,000 668,000 0 102,349,850 1,000,000 0 500,000 112,832,150

77 Phùng Văn Quân 5,520,000 0 0 210,000 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 7,230,000

78 Phùng Văn Quyền 137,760,000 0 3,996,000 443,500 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 143,699,500

79 Phùng Văn Thái 40,080,000 0 4,496,000 1,138,800 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 47,214,800

80 Phùng Văn Thắng 728,000 3,562,500 731,600 1,092,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 7,614,100

81 Phùng Văn Thanh 0 0 5,732,500 0 0 0 5,732,500

82 Phùng Văn Thanh 9,360,000 0 1,865,800 408,000 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 13,133,800

83 Triệu Hữu Khánh 703,500 0 90,450 1,055,250 1,000,000 0 500,000 3,349,200

84 Triệu Minh H ng 721,000 0 92,700 1,081,500 1,000,000 0 500,000 3,395,200

85 Triệu Phúc Nhuần 199,500 0 25,650 299,250 1,000,000 0 500,000 2,024,400

86 Triệu Phúc Sơn 0 2,084,850 0 0 0 2,084,850

87 Triệu Tài Nghiêm 76,320,000 4,357,500 1,030,025 1,446,250 6,536,250 1,000,000 0 500,000 91,190,025

88 Triệu Thị Liên 144,480,000 0 1,405,550 344,500 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 147,730,050




No. Name



Agricultural Land


Trees and Crops


vocation


Aquaculture land




AHs

Bonus for hand-over

ontime

(Phùng Văn Nguyên)

89 Triệu Thị Thân 2,124,500 0 273,150 3,186,750 1,000,000 0 500,000 7,084,400

90 Triệu Văn Bằng 528,500 0 67,950 792,750 1,000,000 0 500,000 2,889,200

91 Triệu Văn Bình 79,200,000 0 6,521,100 0 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 87,221,100

92 Triệu Văn Chiến 0 0 2,326,700 550,000 0 0 2,876,700

93 Triệu Văn Đức 204,000,000 0 8,539,600 1,791,000 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 215,830,600

94 Triệu Văn Hiến 40,560,000 745,500 1,663,500 285,850 1,118,250 1,000,000 0 500,000 45,873,100

95 Triệu Văn Hòa 0 0 4,380,000 1,171,000 0 0 5,551,000

96 Triệu Văn Long 0 0 104,446,080 0 0 0 104,446,080

97 Triệu Văn Minh (Phùng Sinh Thái)

33,120,000 0 3,025,330 37,000 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 37,682,330

98 Triệu Văn Nghĩa 0 0 4,232,800 0 0 0 4,232,800

99 Triệu Văn Nguyên 0 0 4,338,950 535,000 0 0 4,873,950

100 Triệu Văn Phúc 0 0 64,918,999 0 0 0 64,918,999

101 Triệu Văn Quý 0 0 1,826,000 0 0 0 1,826,000

102 Triệu Văn Thanh 39,600,000 199,500 122,649,002 352,650 299,250 1,000,000 0 500,000 164,600,402

103 Triệu Văn Tiến 0 0 39,340,900 398,000 0 0 39,738,900

104 Triệu Văn Tuấn 0 0 5,941,980 0 0 0 5,941,980

105 Triệu Văn Xuân 0 0 23,226,968 0 0 0 23,226,968

106 Bùi Tuấn Hợi 1,809,500 0 232,650 2,714,250 0 500,000 5,256,400

107 Bùi Văn Hùng 117,481,400 0 169,488,544 4,861,500 0 159,899,300 0 500,000 452,230,744

108 Bùi Văn Oanh 402,500 0 0 603,750 0 500,000 1,506,250

109 Bùi Văn Sơn 45,500 0 5,850 68,250 0 500,000 619,600

110 Cao Băng Nhân (Phạm Thị Hoan) 1,029,000 1,904,000 907,000 1,543,500 1,000,000 0 500,000 6,883,500

111 Cao Thị Chinh 0 5,062,050 0 0 0 5,062,050

112 Cao Thị Nguyệt (Cao Văn Chung) 1,179,500 10,767,600 0 1,769,250 0 500,000 14,216,350

113 Cao Thị Tại 882,000 0 0 1,323,000 0 500,000 2,705,000

114 Cao Văn Đông 960,000 0 17,399,920 0 0 0 500,000 18,859,920

115 Cao Văn Đức 36,720,000 0 104,997,935 1,496,500 0 0 500,000 143,714,435

116 Cao Văn Hà 21,840,000 0 10,394,480 1,276,000 0 0 500,000 34,010,480

117 Cao Văn L ơng 51,600,000 0 85,740,959 530,000 0 0 500,000 138,370,959




No. Name



Agricultural Land


Trees and Crops


vocation


Aquaculture land




AHs

Bonus for hand-over

ontime

118 Cao Văn Quyết 871,500 20,260,800 0 1,307,250 0 500,000 22,939,550

119 Cao Văn Thanh 27,360,000 987,000 0 147,000 1,480,500 0 500,000 30,474,500

120 Cao Xuân Thả 17,520,000 0 5,888,280 0 0 0 500,000 23,908,280

121 Đặng Thế Bảy 1,284,500 5,301,600 787,150 1,926,750 0 500,000 9,800,000

122 Đặng Thế Nhẫn 374,500 15,106,400 204,000 561,750 0 500,000 16,746,650

123 Đặng Thị Hoa 32,400,000 0 5,969,250 0 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 39,869,250

124 Đặng Văn Chung 2,194,500 0 0 3,291,750 0 500,000 5,986,250

125 Đặng Văn Hiếu 1,417,500 0 0 2,126,250 0 500,000 4,043,750

126 Đỗ Cao Chắt 2,607,500 0 0 3,911,250 0 500,000 7,018,750

127 Đỗ Cao Nghĩa 234,240,000 0 151,977,000 2,372,000 0 0 500,000 389,089,000

128 Đỗ Cao Tám 1,480,500 0 326,000 2,220,750 0 500,000 4,527,250

129 Đỗ Cao V ơng 0 110,810,310 2,234,000 0 0 113,044,310

130 Đỗ Văn Duy 0 107,314,890 3,567,500 0 0 110,882,390

131 D ơng Thị Thông (Hoàng Văn Dũng) 3,965,500 30,280,460 5,867,500 5,948,250 0 500,000 46,561,710

132 Lại Thị T ớc 51,840,000 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 52,340,000

133 Lê Thị Chinh (Lê Bá Quý)

64,240,000 0 38,716,710 1,107,500 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 105,564,210

134 Lê Thị Chung (Phạm Văn Ngà) 357,000 24,389,100 800,000 535,500 1,000,000 0 500,000 27,581,600

135 Lê Văn Đa 4,315,500 0 0 6,473,250 0 500,000 11,288,750

136 Lê Văn Định 2,569,000 0 330,300 3,853,500 0 500,000 7,252,800

137 Lê Văn Nam 2,915,500 0 374,850 4,373,250 0 500,000 8,163,600

138 Lê Văn Ngạn 6,610,600 3,298,000 2,511,250 9,915,900 0 500,000 22,835,750

139 Lữ Quang Minh 245,322,700 0 182,766,930 9,025,500 0 373,058,650 5,400,000 63,000,000 1,000,000 879,573,780

140 Nguyễn Đức Ph ợng 0 8,890,650 0 0 0 8,890,650

141 Nguyễn Đức Trung 13,200,000 0 0 0 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 14,700,000

142 Nguyễn H ng Kỳ 1,225,000 0 0 1,837,500 0 500,000 3,562,500

143 Nguyễn Ngọc Vân 13,920,000 0 5,722,200 213,650 0 0 500,000 20,355,850

144 Nguyễn Quốc Hải 525,300 0 2,103,750 2,580,000 0 36,817,350 1,000,000 0 500,000 43,526,400

145 Nguyễn Quốc Hòa 387,600 0 0 0 0 27,166,200 1,000,000 0 500,000 29,053,800

146 Nguyễn Thị Diệu (Đặng Ngọc Đỉnh) 160,080,000 577,500 115,498,736 124,000 866,250 1,000,000 0 500,000 278,646,486

147 Nguyễn Thị Dinh 52,560,000 0 9,956,350 941,500 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 64,957,850




No. Name



Agricultural Land


Trees and Crops


vocation


Aquaculture land




AHs

Bonus for hand-over

ontime

(Nguyễn Thị Khải)

148 Nguyễn Thị Lịch (Tào Văn Hùng) 361,043,800 1,732,500 70,552,860 1,964,000 2,598,750 73,158,100 0 500,000 511,550,010

149 Nguyễn Thị Liên 693,000 0 0 1,039,500 0 500,000 2,232,500

150 Nguyễn Thị Lý 0 1,740,400 0 0 0 1,740,400

151 Nguyễn Thị Tảo 500,500 0 0 750,750 0 500,000 1,751,250

152 Nguyễn Thị Thanh (Phúc)

1,907,500 0 245,250 2,861,250 0 500,000 5,514,000

153 Nguyễn Thị Thỏa 80,640,000 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 81,140,000

154 Nguyễn Thị Thủy 20,640,000 0 22,333,700 0 0 0 500,000 43,473,700

155 Nguyễn Thị Vời 1,105,000 672,000 7,542,300 12,511,000 1,008,000 77,447,500 1,000,000 0 500,000 101,785,800

156 Nguyễn Văn Chiên 1,470,000 0 189,000 2,205,000 0 500,000 4,364,000

157 Nguyễn Văn Cơ 4,154,500 0 221,400 6,231,750 0 500,000 11,107,650

158 Nguyễn Văn Đ ng 83,520,000 0 0 0 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 85,020,000

159 Nguyễn Văn Hòa 2,640,000 0 22,655,550 483,000 0 0 500,000 26,278,550

160 Nguyễn Văn Hùng 2,345,000 6,185,000 1,982,500 3,517,500 0 500,000 14,530,000

161 Nguyễn Văn Khuê 49,564,000 528,700 331,579,256 4,684,000 793,050 109,618,000 0 500,000 497,267,006

162 Nguyễn Văn Lai 140,400,000 3,776,500 97,727,732 1,425,000 5,664,750 0 500,000 249,493,982

163 Nguyễn Văn Lý 13,200,000 3,227,000 11,528,460 45,000 4,840,500 0 500,000 33,340,960

164 Nguyễn Văn n 183,840,000 0 133,458,150 1,957,000 0 0 500,000 319,755,150

165 Nguyễn Văn Ph ơng 836,500 0 107,550 1,254,750 0 500,000 2,698,800

166 Nguyễn Văn Thiện 1,067,500 0 0 1,601,250 0 500,000 3,168,750

167 Nguyễn Văn Thuận 0 4,485,800 600,000 0 0 5,085,800

168 Nguyễn Văn Thủy 103,680,000 630,000 23,452,490 857,000 945,000 0 500,000 130,064,490

169 Nguyễn Văn Tích 1,837,500 0 236,250 2,756,250 0 500,000 5,330,000

170 Nguyễn Văn Toàn 1,920,000 0 250,000 340,000 0 0 500,000 3,010,000

171 Nguyễn Vũ Thế Bắc 34,800,000 0 8,852,700 1,061,000 0 0 500,000 45,213,700

172 Nguyễn Xuân Tr ờng 0 7,152,000 0 0 0 7,152,000

173 Nhữ Văn Quang 1,561,000 0 200,700 2,341,500 0 500,000 4,603,200

174 Nhữ Văn Quy 2,036,600 0 8,636,900 5,990,500 0 142,741,700 0 500,000 159,905,700

175 Phạm Thị Hoan 0 2,189,600 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 3,689,600

176 Phạm Thị H ơng (Nguyễn Văn Long) 1,183,000 6,458,100 0 1,774,500 0 500,000 9,915,600

177 Phạm Thị Thanh 2,047,500 0 0 3,071,250 0 500,000 5,618,750




No. Name



Agricultural Land


Trees and Crops


vocation


Aquaculture land




AHs

Bonus for hand-over

ontime

178 Phạm Thị Thịnh 1,095,500 0 0 1,643,250 0 500,000 3,238,750

179 Phạm Thị Thuận (Vũ Văn Đắc) 0 2,086,200 0 0 0 2,086,200

180 Phạm Văn Duy 240,000 553,000 1,739,100 128,000 829,500 1,000,000 0 500,000 4,989,600

181 Phạm Văn Hùng 0 2,256,200 0 0 0 2,256,200

182 Phạm Văn Liền 2,177,000 0 279,900 3,265,500 0 500,000 6,222,400

183 Phạm Văn Luận 689,500 0 0 1,034,250 0 500,000 2,223,750

184 Phạm Văn Minh 1,109,500 0 0 1,664,250 0 500,000 3,273,750

185 Phạm Văn Ngọc 29,520,000 0 2,346,000 1,449,500 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 34,815,500

186 Phạm Văn Sự 0 0 5,000,000 0 0 5,000,000

187 Phạm Văn Tiên 566,100 0 0 0 0 39,676,950 1,000,000 0 500,000 41,743,050

188 Phạm Văn Tỵ 120,805,800 0 34,747,400 4,045,500 0 56,477,100 0 500,000 216,575,800

189 Phạm Xuân Tuyên 1,554,000 5,197,300 373,000 2,331,000 0 500,000 9,955,300

190 Quách H ng Hải 1,941,400 7,203,000 69,323,100 1,008,000 10,804,500 136,069,300 1,000,000 0 500,000 227,849,300

191 Quách Thị Liễu (Nguyễn Đức Quang) 10,272,100 0 64,733,300 3,250,000 0 13,463,950 1,000,000 0 500,000 93,219,350

192 Quách Văn Hoàng 4,809,000 0 0 7,213,500 0 500,000 12,522,500

193 Trịnh Ngọc Thắng 300,109,900 0 85,674,720 3,311,000 0 41,345,050 1,000,000 0 500,000 431,940,670

194 Trịnh Thị Nhài 36,000,000 4,315,500 31,345,280 2,190,000 6,473,250 1,000,000 0 500,000 81,824,030

195 Tr ơng Công Can 61,440,000 0 10,296,200 3,162,500 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 76,398,700

196 Tr ơng Công Chinh 14,880,000 0 9,698,800 1,286,000 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 27,364,800

197 Tr ơng Công Xanh 2,009,000 0 221,400 3,013,500 0 500,000 5,743,900

198 Tr ơng Thị Kim (Vũ Xuân Hòa) 13,920,000 0 11,442,300 13,205,000 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 40,067,300

199 Tr ơng Thị Phúc 815,500 0 0 1,223,250 0 500,000 2,538,750

200 Tr ơng Văn Chung 31,440,000 0 11,158,900 827,000 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 44,925,900

201 Vũ Đình Giao 1,403,500 0 0 2,105,250 0 500,000 4,008,750

202 Vũ Thị Lan 5,520,000 0 0 0 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 7,020,000

203 Vũ Thị Mai 9,120,000 0 0 0 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 10,620,000

204 Vũ Văn Bình 56,000 0 7,200 84,000 0 500,000 647,200

205 Vũ Văn Thanh 1,039,500 0 0 1,559,250 0 500,000 3,098,750

206 Cao Thị Lái 1,277,500 0 164,250 1,916,250 1,000,000 0 500,000 4,858,000

207 Đỗ Thị Liên 2,621,500 0 337,050 3,932,250 1,000,000 0 500,000 8,390,800




No. Name



Agricultural Land


Trees and Crops


vocation


Aquaculture land




AHs

Bonus for hand-over

ontime

208 Đỗ Thiện Phú 4,291,000 0 551,700 6,436,500 0 500,000 11,779,200

209 Đỗ Văn Tiến 11,798,500 0 1,516,950 17,697,750 0 500,000 31,513,200

210 Hà Văn Tích 1,883,000 0 242,100 2,824,500 1,000,000 0 500,000 6,449,600

211 Kh ơng L u Thúy 140,000 0 18,000 210,000 0 500,000 868,000

212 Lê Thị Cẩm 819,000 0 105,300 1,228,500 0 500,000 2,652,800

213 Lê Trần Tuyền 1,991,500 14,582,180 3,774,550 2,987,250 0 500,000 23,835,480

214 Lê Xuân Cộng 1,480,500 0 190,350 2,220,750 0 500,000 4,391,600

215 Lê Xuân Mạnh 4,882,500 0 627,750 7,323,750 0 500,000 13,334,000

216 Lê Xuân Ý 308,000 0 39,600 462,000 0 500,000 1,309,600

217 Nguyễn Hải Ninh 2,198,000 0 282,600 3,297,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 7,277,600

218 Nguyễn H ng T 2,625,000 0 337,500 3,937,500 0 500,000 7,400,000

219 Nguyễn Minh Châu 3,286,500 0 422,550 4,929,750 0 500,000 9,138,800

220 Nguyễn Ngọc Thắng 1,627,500 0 209,250 2,441,250 0 500,000 4,778,000

221 Nguyễn Xuân L u 4,172,000 0 536,400 6,258,000 0 500,000 11,466,400

222 Phạm Thị Bình 2,324,000 0 298,800 3,486,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 7,608,800

223 Phạm Thị Chính 9,177,000 0 1,179,900 13,765,500 1,000,000 0 500,000 25,622,400

224 Phạm Thị Nghiêm 840,000 0 108,000 1,260,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 3,708,000

225 Phạm Thị N ơng 1,155,000 0 148,500 1,732,500 1,000,000 0 500,000 4,536,000

226 Phạm Thị Thoa 3,454,500 0 444,150 5,181,750 1,000,000 0 500,000 10,580,400

227 Phạm Văn C ơng 997,500 0 276,750 1,496,250 1,000,000 0 500,000 4,270,500

228 Phạm Văn Đại 1,316,000 0 169,200 1,974,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 4,959,200

229 Phạm Văn Doưn 2,985,500 0 383,850 4,478,250 1,000,000 0 500,000 9,347,600

230 Phạm Văn Hoàn 10,083,500 0 1,296,450 15,125,250 1,000,000 0 500,000 28,005,200

231 Phạm Văn H ng 742,000 0 95,400 1,113,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 3,450,400

232 Phạm Văn H ơng 4,434,500 0 570,150 6,651,750 1,000,000 0 500,000 13,156,400

233 Phạm Văn Khê 196,000 0 25,200 294,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 2,015,200

234 Phạm Văn Phi 190,400 1,116,500 11,118,280 2,904,050 1,674,750 9,424,800 0 500,000 26,928,780

235 Phạm Văn Phùng 4,854,500 0 624,150 7,281,750 1,000,000 0 500,000 14,260,400

236 Phạm Văn Vũ 6,842,500 0 879,750 10,263,750 0 500,000 18,486,000

237 Trần Đức Long 3,104,500 0 399,150 4,656,750 0 500,000 8,660,400

238 Trần Thị Thủy 5,544,000 0 712,800 8,316,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 16,072,800

239 Tr ơng Công Ch ơng 4,865,000 0 625,500 7,297,500 1,000,000 0 500,000 14,288,000




No. Name



Agricultural Land


Trees and Crops


vocation


Aquaculture land




AHs

Bonus for hand-over

ontime

240 Tr ơng Công Việt 6,821,500 4,398,350 5,400,050 10,232,250 1,000,000 0 500,000 28,352,150

241 Cao Minh Ph ơng 80,500 10,350 120,750 1,000,000 0 500,000 1,711,600

242 Cao Thị Lai (Phạm Văn Duyệt) 528,500 67,950 792,750 1,000,000 0 500,000 2,889,200

243 Cao Văn Phan (Cao Đăng Khoa) 4,774,000 613,800 7,161,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 14,048,800

244 Hà Đăng Điệp 2,061,500 265,050 3,092,250 1,000,000 0 500,000 6,918,800

245 Hà Văn Đạt 16,359,000 2,103,300 24,538,500 1,000,000 0 500,000 44,500,800

246 Phạm Thị Hoa 549,500 70,650 824,250 1,000,000 0 500,000 2,944,400

247 Phạm Thị Nhung 3,356,500 431,550 5,034,750 1,000,000 0 500,000 10,322,800

248 Phạm Thị Sao 13,121,500 1,687,050 19,682,250 1,000,000 0 500,000 35,990,800

249 Phạm Văn Chắc 10,500 1,350 15,750 1,000,000 0 500,000 1,527,600

250 Phạm Văn Địa (Phạm Văn Quang) 10,549,000 1,356,300 15,823,500 1,000,000 0 500,000 29,228,800

251 Phạm Văn Diện (Phạm Văn Toàn) 2,184,000 280,800 3,276,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 7,240,800

252 Phạm Văn Kẹt 3,115,000 400,500 4,672,500 1,000,000 0 500,000 9,688,000

253 Phạm Văn Khởi 2,877,000 369,900 4,315,500 1,000,000 0 500,000 9,062,400

254 Phạm Văn Nghiệm 10,055,500 1,292,850 15,083,250 1,000,000 0 500,000 27,931,600

255 Phạm Văn Quý 12,558,000 1,614,600 18,837,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 34,509,600

256 Phạm Văn Vui 17,871,000 2,297,700 26,806,500 1,000,000 0 500,000 48,475,200

257 Bùi Ngọ Đức 80,500 0 10,350 120,750 0 500,000 711,600

258 Bùi Ngọc H ơng 67,320,000 4,763,500 0 2,842,000 7,145,250 0 82,070,750

259 Bùi Ngọc Tân 84,000 0 10,800 126,000 0 500,000 720,800

260 Bùi Ngọc Tỉnh 1,799,000 0 231,300 2,698,500 0 500,000 5,228,800

261 Bùi Thị Dung 717,500 0 92,250 1,076,250 0 500,000 2,386,000

262 Bùi Thị Lâm (Lê Xuân H ng) 36,210,000 0 7,239,000 1,022,000 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 45,971,000

263 Bùi Thị Sang (Bùi Văn Tâm) 0 18,202,680 3,685,550 0 0 21,888,230

264 Bùi Thị T ơi (Quách Văn Bốn) 10,540,000 801,500 6,171,700 2,735,050 1,202,250 1,000,000 0 500,000 22,950,500

265 Bùi Văn Minh 79,900,000 4,249,000 57,430,578 3,560,300 6,373,500 6,480,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 159,493,378

266 Bùi Văn Quyền 2,576,000 0 331,200 3,864,000 0 500,000 7,271,200

267 Bùi Xuân Bình 1,372,000 0 176,400 2,058,000 0 500,000 4,106,400




No. Name



Agricultural Land


Trees and Crops


vocation


Aquaculture land




AHs

Bonus for hand-over

ontime

268 Bùi Xuân C ờng 2,264,500 0 5,974,150 3,396,750 0 500,000 12,135,400

269 Cao Thị Ngọc 14,450,000 0 6,175,000 0 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 22,125,000

270 Cao Văn Thiết 7,000 0 900 10,500 0 500,000 518,400

271 Đặng Ngọc Thái 770,000 0 99,000 1,155,000 0 500,000 2,524,000

272 Đặng Văn Hiền 17,850,000 0 4,089,360 1,879,000 0 0 500,000 24,318,360

273 Đặng Văn Vĩnh 847,000 0 108,900 1,270,500 0 500,000 2,726,400

274 Đào Công Tựu 4,938,500 0 634,950 7,407,750 0 500,000 13,481,200

275 Đào Thị Tuyết 3,069,500 0 394,650 4,604,250 0 500,000 8,568,400

276 Đỗ Huy Bình 2,716,000 0 349,200 4,074,000 0 500,000 7,639,200

277 Đỗ Huy Hà 47,940,000 451,500 7,496,000 1,219,000 677,250 0 500,000 58,283,750

278 Đỗ Minh Hải (Đỗ Tất Thắng) 2,786,000 0 4,179,000 0 500,000 7,465,000

279 Đỗ Quang Cách 5,698,000 0 732,600 8,547,000 0 500,000 15,477,600

280 Đỗ Thị Hoan (Trịnh Văn Sự) 9,989,000 0 6,308,400 14,983,500 2,160,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 34,940,900

281 Đặng Văn Thái (Đỗ Thị Minh)

55,590,000 0 55,407,016 526,000 0 0 500,000 112,023,016

282 Đỗ Thị Nga (Đặng Văn Quảng) 3,111,500 0 400,050 4,667,250 0 500,000 8,678,800

283 Đỗ Văn Đệ 2,919,000 0 375,300 4,378,500 0 500,000 8,172,800

284 Đỗ Văn Huynh 451,500 0 58,050 677,250 0 500,000 1,686,800

285 Đỗ Văn Quang 33,320,000 4,595,500 13,563,440 720,850 6,893,250 0 500,000 59,593,040

286 Đỗ Văn Sáu (Đỗ Văn Nghi)

1,088,500 0 139,950 1,632,750 0 500,000 3,361,200

287 Đỗ Văn Tôn 523,600 0 0 0 0 25,918,200 0 500,000 26,941,800

288 Lê Duy Ngọc 2,835,000 0 364,500 4,252,500 0 500,000 7,952,000

289 Lê Huy Lợi 805,000 0 0 1,207,500 0 500,000 2,512,500

290 Lê Phi Dũng 0 1,421,200 1,630,000 0 0 3,051,200

291 Lê Thị Khánh (Đỗ Hùng Sơn) 1,116,500 0 143,550 1,674,750 0 500,000 3,434,800

292 Lê Thị Ph ơng (Đào Duy Minh) 609,000 0 78,300 913,500 0 500,000 2,100,800

293 Lê Văn C ơng 1,445,500 0 185,850 2,168,250 0 500,000 4,299,600

294 Lê Văn Thủy 212,500 0 0 0 0 10,518,750 0 500,000 11,231,250

295 Lê Xuân Bắc 28,000 0 3,600 42,000 0 500,000 573,600




No. Name



Agricultural Land


Trees and Crops


vocation


Aquaculture land




AHs

Bonus for hand-over

ontime

(Lê Xuân Sâm)

296 Lê Xuân Nghĩa 1,771,000 0 227,700 2,656,500 0 500,000 5,155,200

297 Lê Xuân Quyết 77,000 0 9,900 115,500 0 500,000 702,400

298 Lê Xuân Vụ 532,000 0 68,400 798,000 0 500,000 1,898,400

299 Nguyễn Đức Hùng 1,249,500 0 160,650 1,874,250 0 500,000 3,784,400

300 Nguyễn Duy Chinh 5,645,500 0 725,850 8,468,250 0 500,000 15,339,600

301 Nguyễn Hoàng Lâm 14,620,000 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 15,120,000

302 Nguyễn Hữu Hoằng 248,200 3,902,500 5,255,600 1,848,750 5,853,750 12,285,900 0 500,000 29,894,700

303 Nguyễn Hữu Thắng 5,575,500 0 716,850 8,363,250 0 500,000 15,155,600

304 Nguyễn Hữu Tùng 2,400,000 0 500,000 2,900,000

305 Nguyễn Ngọc Bích 2,324,000 1,810,000 4,410,000 3,486,000 0 500,000 12,530,000

306 Nguyễn Thị Ký 1,491,000 0 191,700 2,236,500 0 500,000 4,419,200

307 Nguyễn Thị Ngân 927,500 0 119,250 1,391,250 0 500,000 2,938,000

308 Nguyễn Thị Ngọc 55,760,000 0 55,048,790 1,604,000 0 0 500,000 112,912,790

309 Nguyễn Thị Nhàn 0 0 1,606,500 155,500 0 0 1,762,000

310 Nguyễn Thị Thanh 1,295,000 0 166,500 1,942,500 0 500,000 3,904,000

311 Nguyễn Trọng Thành 37,060,000 0 15,660,340 998,000 0 0 500,000 54,218,340

312 Nguyễn Trọng Trung 48,960,000 0 2,573,500 1,034,000 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 54,067,500

313 Nguyễn Văn Bản 85,630,500 3,650,500 5,235,150 469,350 5,475,750 0 500,000 100,961,250

314 Nguyễn Văn Bôi 2,152,500 0 276,750 3,228,750 0 500,000 6,158,000

315 Nguyễn Văn Bút 1,743,000 0 224,100 2,614,500 0 500,000 5,081,600

316 Nguyễn Văn Chính 266,000 0 34,200 399,000 0 500,000 1,199,200

317 Nguyễn Văn Đáng 2,838,500 0 364,950 4,257,750 0 500,000 7,961,200

318 Nguyễn Văn Đào 385,900 2,936,500 12,016,550 2,761,050 4,404,750 19,102,050 0 500,000 42,106,800

319 Nguyễn Văn Minh 112,000 0 14,400 168,000 0 500,000 794,400

320 Nguyễn Văn Sự 54,720,000 672,000 51,993,628 13,737,900 1,008,000 0 500,000 122,631,528

321 Nguyễn Xuân Hải 12,750,000 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 13,250,000

322 Phạm Ngọc Điền 693,600 0 3,650,000 1,040,400 1,000,000 0 500,000 6,884,000

323 Phạm Thị Hán 675,500 0 86,850 1,013,250 0 500,000 2,275,600

324 Phạm Thị Hạnh 2,205,000 11,966,000 1,739,500 3,307,500 1,000,000 0 20,218,000

325 Phạm Thị Nhuần 74,630,000 0 45,508,910 713,000 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 122,351,910

326 Phạm Thị Quyết 0 0 16,521,669 0 0 0 16,521,669




No. Name



Agricultural Land


Trees and Crops


vocation


Aquaculture land




AHs

Bonus for hand-over

ontime

327 Phạm Thị Thóc 2,471,000 0 317,700 3,706,500 0 500,000 6,995,200

328 Phạm Thị Vân (Đỗ Thị Thu Hòa) 2,786,000 12,689,860 1,423,500 4,179,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 22,578,360

329 Phạm Thị Vui 2,674,000 1,020,000 643,800 4,011,000 0 500,000 8,848,800

330 Phạm Văn Bằng (Phạm Nh Ý) 3,643,500 0 468,450 5,465,250 0 500,000 10,077,200

331 Phạm Văn Chiến 2,975,000 0 382,500 4,462,500 0 500,000 8,320,000

332 Phạm Văn Định 280,000 0 36,000 420,000 0 500,000 1,236,000

333 Phạm Văn Quảng 37,740,000 0 131,498,960 652,000 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 171,390,960

334 Phạm Văn Tĩnh 22,780,000 0 10,609,750 4,099,000 0 0 500,000 37,988,750

335 Phạm Văn Vinh 142,800 0 0 0 0 7,068,600 1,000,000 0 500,000 8,711,400

336 Phạm Văn Yên 1,536,500 0 197,550 2,304,750 0 500,000 4,538,800

337 Phan Thị Tr ờng (Phạm Văn Đại) 1,669,500 0 214,650 2,504,250 0 500,000 4,888,400

338 Trịnh Công Bình 1,596,000 0 205,200 2,394,000 0 500,000 4,695,200

339 Trịnh Trọng Tâm 2,355,500 0 302,850 3,533,250 0 500,000 6,691,600

340 Trịnh Xuân D ơng 2,653,000 0 341,100 3,979,500 0 500,000 7,473,600

341 Tr ơng Thị Dự (Quách Văn Tám) 63,070,000 0 12,306,920 4,709,500 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 81,586,420

342 Vũ Văn Sinh 3,713,500 0 477,450 5,570,250 0 500,000 10,261,200

343 Bùi Thị Yên (Phạm Văn T ởng) 31,960,000 0 6,042,100 2,224,000 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 41,726,100

344 Cao Thị Vinh 0 0 1,354,500 0 0 0 1,354,500

345 Cao Văn Thiết 18,530,000 7,000 49,761,930 547,900 10,500 0 500,000 69,357,330

346 Cao Xuân Tr ờng 122,740,000 0 64,517,750 2,276,500 0 0 500,000 190,034,250

347 Đỗ Đức Th ờng 0 0 4,572,000 7,280,000 0 0 11,852,000

348 Đỗ Nhuận 3,514,000 60,594,400 2,839,800 5,271,000 0 500,000 72,719,200

349 Đỗ Quang Tr ờng 76,840,000 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 77,340,000

350 Đỗ Thế Ph ơng 33,660,000 5,288,500 0 0 7,932,750 0 500,000 47,381,250

351 Đỗ Thị H ng (Nguyễn Văn Chuẩn) 1,004,500 0 129,150 1,506,750 0 500,000 3,140,400

352 Đỗ Thị T ơi 15,980,000 0 0 440,500 0 0 500,000 16,920,500

353 Đỗ Văn Chung 44,370,000 0 94,742,000 7,606,500 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 148,218,500

354 Đỗ Văn C ờng 120,700,000 0 135,641,350 6,688,000 0 0 500,000 263,529,350

355 Đỗ Văn Huân 2,210,000 0 2,577,000 0 0 0 500,000 5,287,000




No. Name



Agricultural Land


Trees and Crops


vocation


Aquaculture land




AHs

Bonus for hand-over

ontime

356 Đỗ Văn L ơng 44,880,000 5,803,000 0 0 8,704,500 0 500,000 59,887,500

357 Đỗ Viết H ng 162,520,000 4,592,000 288,059,802 15,517,500 6,888,000 0 500,000 478,077,302

358 Hoàng Minh Thức 3,020,500 0 388,350 4,530,750 0 500,000 8,439,600

359 Lê Duy Hoàn (Nguyễn Thị Dự) 5,440,000 0 13,317,000 859,500 0 0 500,000 20,116,500

360 Lê Duy Trung 7,140,000 0 3,245,000 0 0 0 500,000 10,885,000

361 Lê Huy Đắc 161,500,000 0 90,709,810 6,082,000 0 0 500,000 258,791,810

362 Lê Thị Dung (Đỗ Văn Thọ) 94,180,000 0 0 0 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 95,680,000

363 Lê Thị Tuyết 0 0 14,960,360 363,500 0 0 15,323,860

364 Lê Văn Hoàn 0 0 21,244,000 792,000 0 0 22,036,000

365 Lê Xuân Nha 2,219,000 0 4,903,500 3,328,500 0 500,000 10,951,000

366 Lữ Tuyên Hòa (Bùi Thị Điền) 6,630,000 0 1,615,000 0 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 9,745,000

367 Nguyễn Đăng Cộng 1,183,000 0 152,100 1,774,500 0 500,000 3,609,600

368 Nguyễn Ngọc Hiệp 14,960,000 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 15,460,000

369 Nguyễn Quốc Ph ơng 0 3,027,500 104,968,710 2,877,250 4,541,250 0 500,000 115,914,710

370 Nguyễn Quốc Viên 0 0 15,924,840 0 0 0 15,924,840

371 Nguyễn Quốc V ơng 13,430,000 0 31,476,000 949,000 0 0 500,000 46,355,000

372 Nguyễn Thế Chính 18,020,000 0 39,773,072 62,000 0 0 500,000 58,355,072

373 Nguyễn Thế Quang 0 0 2,443,750 3,347,000 0 0 5,790,750

374 Nguyễn Thị Chi (Nguyễn Văn Lộc) 283,730,000 0 0 3,842,400 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 289,072,400

375 Nguyễn Thị Dự 44,030,000 0 131,607,840 3,951,000 0 0 500,000 180,088,840

376 Nguyễn Thị Hằng 33,150,000 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 33,650,000

377 Nguyễn Thị Huệ 36,210,000 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 36,710,000

378 Nguyễn Thị H ờng 26,010,000 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 26,510,000

379 Nguyễn Thị Liên 9,180,000 0 4,510,000 0 0 0 500,000 14,190,000

380 Nguyễn Thị Lý 43,010,000 0 81,045,980 681,000 0 0 500,000 125,236,980

381 Nguyễn Thị Miên 1,700,000 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 2,200,000

382 Nguyễn Thị Nga (Bùi Thị Thanh) 9,010,000 1,183,000 13,113,050 1,567,100 1,774,500 1,000,000 0 500,000 28,147,650

383 Nguyễn Thị Nghĩa 46,070,000 0 6,051,450 2,626,000 0 0 500,000 55,247,450

384 Nguyễn Thị Vân (Bùi Văn Sơn) 2,145,500 0 275,850 3,218,250 0 500,000 6,139,600




No. Name



Agricultural Land


Trees and Crops


vocation


Aquaculture land




AHs

Bonus for hand-over

ontime

385 Nguyễn Trung Liên 30,430,000 5,554,500 14,280,160 6,323,600 8,331,750 1,000,000 0 500,000 66,420,010

386 Nguyễn Văn Bình 8,840,000 0 7,871,250 778,000 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 18,989,250

387 Nguyễn Văn B i 1,424,500 36,372,720 4,703,500 2,136,750 0 500,000 45,137,470

388 Nguyễn Văn Cộng 17,340,000 0 14,371,000 1,877,000 0 0 500,000 34,088,000

389 Nguyễn Văn Đại (Vũ Thị Ph ơng) 43,520,000 0 76,616,700 830,000 0 0 500,000 121,466,700

390 Nguyễn Văn Hiếu 10,200,000 0 81,319,458 2,558,000 0 0 500,000 94,577,458

391 Nguyễn Văn Nhân 54,570,000 0 106,461,000 1,789,000 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 164,320,000

392 Nguyễn Văn Thiên 13,090,000 0 0 425,000 0 0 500,000 14,015,000

393 Nguyễn Văn T 37,230,000 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 37,730,000

394 Phạm Ngọc Thuyết 4,930,000 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 5,430,000

395 Phạm Thị Bào 2,226,000 0 286,200 3,339,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 7,351,200

396 Phạm Thị Lệ (Nguyễn Ngọc Huấn) 98,600,000 0 226,156,600 1,427,000 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 327,683,600

397 Phạm Thị Quân (Nguyễn Văn Tuất) 1,816,500 0 233,550 2,724,750 1,000,000 0 500,000 6,274,800

398 Phạm Thị Quyên (Lê Văn Tuy) 20,910,000 0 3,722,000 379,500 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 26,511,500

399 Phạm Thị Thanh 0 0 0 2,013,000 0 0 2,013,000

400 Phạm Văn A 57,970,000 0 28,395,000 1,168,000 0 0 500,000 88,033,000

401 Phạm Văn C 0 0 0 2,305,000 0 0 2,305,000

402 Phạm Văn Đối 4,291,000 0 551,700 6,436,500 1,000,000 0 500,000 12,779,200

403 Phạm Văn Lý 3,223,500 276,037,868 1,688,450 4,835,250 10,800,000 0 500,000 297,085,068

404 Phạm Văn Quyền (GCN Phạm Việt Lý) 13,191,500 0 6,191,010 19,787,250 10,800,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 51,469,760

405 Phạm Văn Sáu 0 0 13,811,700 439,000 0 0 14,250,700

406 Phạm Văn Thái 0 0 1,936,800 508,500 0 0 2,445,300

407 Phạm Văn Yến 0 0 25,461,000 1,684,000 0 0 27,145,000

408 Quách Thị Hải (Hoàng Văn Khánh) 243,100,000 5,008,500 272,153,108 6,838,000 7,512,750 84,150,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 620,262,358

409 Quách Văn Chắc 164,730,000 0 5,209,200 3,285,000 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 174,724,200

410 Quách Văn Niễn (Quách Ngọc Long) 4,679,500 0 1,270,150 7,019,250 1,000,000 0 500,000 14,468,900

411 Tr ơng Thị Hạnh 0 2,604,800 1,518,000 0 0 4,122,800

412 Vũ Xuân Hoạt 354,450,000 6,433,000 67,211,440 9,146,250 9,649,500 10,800,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 459,190,190




No. Name



Agricultural Land


Trees and Crops


vocation


Aquaculture land




AHs

Bonus for hand-over

ontime

413 Vũ Xuân Thảnh 10,710,000 0 5,521,070 829,500 0 0 500,000 17,560,570

414 Bùi Minh Thanh 0 20,873,640 0 0 0 20,873,640

415 Bùi Thị Hà 0 8,775,600 0 0 0 8,775,600

416 Bùi Văn Lại 0 10,520,300 0 0 0 10,520,300

417 Cao Bằng Nhân 0 1,904,000 760,000 0 0 2,664,000

418 Cao Đại Hành 0 27,083,180 1,339,500 0 0 28,422,680

419 Cao Thị Minh 0 14,388,960 1,878,000 0 0 16,266,960

420 Cao Thị Phê 0 2,070,200 1,870,000 0 0 3,940,200

421 Đỗ Thị Ph ơng 0 18,031,660 373,000 0 0 18,404,660

422 D ơng Huy Hoàng 0 1,377,000 0 0 0 1,377,000

423 Hà Bình Minh 0 3,476,304 0 0 0 3,476,304

424 Hà Thị Thu Hiền 0 3,805,000 210,000 0 0 4,015,000

425 Hà Trung Trực 0 16,726,224 376,000 0 0 17,102,224

426 Lê Khả Thảo 0 17,600,000 652,000 0 0 18,252,000

427 Lê Minh Đức 0 18,678,100 503,000 0 0 19,181,100

428 Lê Thị Cẩm 0 16,967,740 264,000 0 0 17,231,740

429 Lê Thị Ph ơng 0 27,425,900 0 0 0 27,425,900

430 Lê Văn Dũng 0 22,497,240 290,000 0 0 22,787,240

431 Lê Văn Hạnh 0 11,825,404 1,040,000 0 0 12,865,404

432 Lê Văn Ngọc 0 18,993,400 0 0 0 18,993,400

433 Lê Xuân Hòa 0 799,000 0 0 0 799,000

434 Lê Xuân Thắng 0 5,596,600 1,153,000 0 0 6,749,600

435 Mai Thị Loan 0 10,409,000 622,500 0 0 11,031,500

436 Ngô Thanh Tuy 0 8,292,780 0 0 0 8,292,780

437 Nguyễn Đăng Giang 0 350,089,816 2,390,500 0 0 352,480,316

438 Nguyễn Đăng Hộ 0 103,413,080 1,398,000 0 0 104,811,080

439 Nguyễn Đăng Lợi 0 4,715,276 491,000 0 0 5,206,276

440 Nguyễn Đức Dục 0 933,300 929,000 0 0 1,862,300

441 Nguyễn Ngọc Chuẩn 0 21,676,110 778,500 0 0 22,454,610

442 Nguyễn Thị Hảo 0 6,388,140 278,000 0 0 6,666,140

443 Nguyễn Thị H ờng 0 1,993,500 0 0 0 1,993,500

444 Nguyễn Thị Liên 0 1,275,000 0 0 0 1,275,000




No. Name



Agricultural Land


Trees and Crops


vocation


Aquaculture land




AHs

Bonus for hand-over

ontime

445 Nguyễn Thị Lợi 0 1,122,000 1,996,000 0 0 3,118,000

446 Nguyễn Thị Thúy 0 15,402,248 220,000 0 0 15,622,248

447 Nguyễn Thiện Thi 0 4,442,524 359,500 0 0 4,802,024

448 Nguyễn Tiến H ng 0 17,626,716 2,234,000 0 0 19,860,716

449 Nguyễn Trung Quốc 0 15,849,540 998,000 0 0 16,847,540

450 Nguyễn Văn Trung 0 963,900 130,000 0 0 1,093,900

451 Nguyễn Văn Hải 0 7,898,400 65,000 0 0 7,963,400

452 Nguyễn Văn Lộc 0 8,322,040 0 0 0 8,322,040

453 Nguyễn Văn Nga 0 13,311,700 0 0 13,311,700

454 Nguyễn Văn Thanh 0 33,065,400 65,000 0 0 33,130,400

455 Nguyễn Xuân H ơng 0 8,775,600 910,500 0 0 9,686,100

456 Nguyễn Xuân Sinh 0 41,241,700 980,000 0 0 42,221,700

457 Phạm Đình Tuy 0 7,651,200 65,000 0 0 7,716,200

458 Phạm Minh Tuấn 0 7,100,680 0 0 0 7,100,680

459 Phạm Ngọc H i 0 112,699,900 622,000 0 0 113,321,900

460 Phạm Thị Hà (Nguyễn Đức Ninh) 0 1,088,000 0 0 0 1,088,000

461 Phạm Thị Hằng 0 29,364,102 123,000 0 0 29,487,102

462 Phạm Thị Hoan (Nhân) 0 25,366,260 907,000 0 0 26,273,260

463 Phạm Thị Liễu 0 2,244,000 0 0 0 2,244,000

464 Phạm Thị Ngơi 0 2,244,000 622,000 0 0 2,866,000

465 Phạm Thị Thu 0 164,760,160 326,000 0 0 165,086,160

466 Phạm Thị Vân 0 11,113,660 326,000 0 0 11,439,660

467 Phạm Tr ờng Sinh 0 1,377,000 0 0 0 1,377,000

468 Phạm Văn Hùng 0 6,239,600 0 0 0 6,239,600

469 Phạm Văn Luận 0 16,030,000 0 0 0 16,030,000

470 Phạm Văn Mạnh 0 9,041,000 0 0 0 9,041,000

471 Phạm Văn Nhuận 0 5,705,250 0 0 0 5,705,250

472 Phạm Văn Sáu 0 2,337,000 264,000 0 0 2,601,000

473 Phạm Văn Thanh 0 10,806,600 0 0 0 10,806,600

474 Quách Thị Điểm 0 17,148,440 4,498,500 0 0 21,646,940

475 Quách Thị Huệ (Lê Xuân Sinh)

0 10,668,020 0 0 0 10,668,020




No. Name



Agricultural Land


Trees and Crops


vocation


Aquaculture land




AHs

Bonus for hand-over

ontime

476 Quách Văn Thiên 0 7,651,200 810,000 0 0 8,461,200

477 Trần Đình Đại 0 4,004,520 0 0 0 4,004,520

478 Trịnh H ng Tú 0 6,509,500 1,244,000 0 0 7,753,500

479 Trịnh Thị Nhài 0 16,187,130 1,942,000 0 0 18,129,130

480 Trịnh Trọng Lâm 0 18,435,580 380,000 0 0 18,815,580

481 Tr ơng Công Hữu 0 4,880,700 404,500 0 0 5,285,200

482 Tr ơng Công Minh 0 18,108,000 306,500 0 0 18,414,500

483 Tr ơng Thị Hiệp (Phạm Văn Ph ợng) 18,527,644 855,000 0 19,382,644

484 Tr ơng Thị Yến (Lê Xuân Hoàng)

1,700,000 1,866,000 0 3,566,000

Trạm Kiểm Lâm (Phạm Văn Tin - Tr ởng trạm) 24,952,000 1,174,000 0 26,126,000

UBND xư Cẩm Bình 112,315,000 1,518,000 0 113,833,000




Annex 1 - Table 7: Summary compensation plan of Cam Thach commune

No. Name



Agricultural Land


Trees and Crops



Aquaculture land


Allowance for vulnerable

HHs


AHs

Bonus for hand-over

ontime

Total 1,653,918,200 224,018,100 17,779,650 1,787,279,252 198,450,140 329,106,000 185,990,050 65,880,000 72,000,000 137,000,000 57,300,000 4,728,721,392

1 Bùi Văn Từng 514,800 5,042,000 0 0 5,556,800

2 Nguyễn Đức Dục 844,800 842,400 0 1,687,200

3 Phạm Thị Chủ 2,737,000 0 4,105,500 1,000,000 0 500,000 8,342,500

4 Nguyễn Thị Tình 15,000,000 171,313,581 3,240,000 11,000,000 1,000,000 201,553,581

5 Bùi Hà Quyền 42,300,000 37,785,690 1,000,000 0 500,000 81,585,690

6 Bùi Thị Sen 441,649,679 4,320,000 63,000,000 1,000,000 509,969,679

7 Bùi Văn Chính 2,922,500 4,087,022 7,320,000 4,383,750 1,000,000 0 500,000 20,213,272

8 Bùi Văn Niên 119,127,380 1,143,500 4,320,000 63,000,000 1,000,000 188,590,880

9 Bùi Văn Thành 5,968,000 680,000 0 6,648,000

10 Đỗ Thị Lải 966,240 622,000 0 1,588,240

11 Đỗ Thị Lan 15,353,200 0 0 15,353,200

12 Đỗ Văn Sáu 85,460,150 610,000 0 86,070,150

13 Đỗ Văn Thắng 28,800,000 5,250,100 792,000 0 500,000 35,342,100

14 Hà Thế Hùng 4,136,000 978,000 0 5,114,000

15 Hoàng Minh Thành 76,200,000 3,194,400 0 500,000 79,894,400

16 Hoàng Văn An 2,118,200 6,853,000 5,906,450 6,695,000 10,279,500 185,990,050 1,000,000 0 500,000 219,342,200

17 Hoàng Văn Thọ (Hoàng Thị Nga) 6,520,000 443,000 0 6,963,000

18 Lê Chinh Hoàn 9,097,200 0 9,097,200

19 Lê Đức Minh 4,178,000 0 4,178,000

20 Lê Văn Chung 16,500,000 6,009,454 622,000 0 500,000 23,631,454

21 Lê Văn Quang 1,892,000 0 1,892,000

22 Lê Viết Kiệm 2,442,000 622,000 0 3,064,000

23 Nguyến Ánh Sao 15,000,000 7,072,000 907,500 0 500,000 23,479,500

24 Nguyễn Chí Doanh 658,000 1,350 987,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 3,146,350

25 Nguyễn Hữu Th 26,700,000 3,995,360 1,011,000 0 500,000 32,206,360

26 Nguyễn Thị Tuyến 1,931,860 730,000 0 2,661,860

27 Nguyễn Tiến Dũng 38,400,000 0 38,400,000

28 Nguyễn Văn Hiếu 1,848,000 0 1,848,000




No. Name



Agricultural Land


Trees and Crops



Aquaculture land



HHs


AHs

Bonus for hand-over

ontime

29 Nguyễn Văn Long 46,500,000 9,127,206 622,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 57,749,206

30 Nguyễn Văn Mạnh 35,700,000 3,888,550 0 500,000 40,088,550

31 Nguyễn Văn Phớn 37,500,000 16,402,125 544,000 0 500,000 54,946,125

32 Nguyễn Văn Thái 36,600,000 4,094,500 0 500,000 41,194,500

33 Phạm Bá Bàn 45,598,936 420,000 0 46,018,936

34 Phạm Mạnh Hùng 1,314,100 4,427,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 7,241,100

35 Phạm Minh Tuyển 397,200 0 397,200

36 Phạm Quốc Hội 4,245,500 0 545,850 6,368,250 1,000,000 0 500,000 12,659,600

37 Phạm Quốc Ph ơng 3,000,000 4,971,200 1,000,000 0 500,000 9,471,200

38 Phạm Sậu 6,481,500 19,661,200 9,722,250 8,640,000 1,000,000 0 800,000 46,304,950

39 Phạm Thanh Năm 49,000 10,080 73,500 0 500,000 632,580

40 Phạm Thị Nê 556,500 114,480 834,750 0 500,000 2,005,730

41 Phạm Thị Ph ờng 1,053,500 1,921,270 1,580,250 1,000,000 0 500,000 6,055,020

42 Phạm Văn Chân 875,400,000 4,480,000 5,478,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 886,858,000

43 Phạm Văn Chuyên 60,300,000 2,280,960 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 64,080,960

44 Phạm Văn H i 833,000 171,360 1,249,500 1,000,000 0 500,000 3,753,860

45 Phạm Văn Lai 4,252,500 20,184,680 6,378,750 0 30,815,930

46 Phạm Văn Luận 276,500 72,880 414,750 1,000,000 0 500,000 2,264,130

47 Phạm Văn Mưn 703,500 144,720 1,055,250 0 500,000 2,403,470

48 Phạm Văn Phỉnh(Phạm Văn L ơng)

2,299,500 295,650 3,449,250 1,000,000 0 500,000 7,544,400

49 Phạm Văn Quyền 6,072,000 395,000 0 6,467,000

50 Phạm Văn Viễn 1,718,500 220,950 2,577,750 1,000,000 0 500,000 6,017,200

51 Phạm Xuân Viện 5,700,000 385,000 919,600 801,200 577,500 1,000,000 0 500,000 9,883,300

52 Phan Thanh Sơn 25,200,000 18,413,650 2,150,500 0 500,000 46,264,150

53 Phan Thị Thủy 36,900,000 4,177,900 1,778,000 0 500,000 43,355,900

54 Phan Văn Thảo 14,500,200 0 14,500,200

55 Phùng Bá Chung 12,600,000 755,040 948,000 0 500,000 14,803,040

56 Phùng Bá Hiền 31,200,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 32,700,000

57 Phùng Bá Khanh 6,000,000 1,128,000 1,620,000 0 500,000 9,248,000

58 Phùng Bá Thắng (Hà) 20,400,000 1,235,500 5,861,600 9,818,850 1,853,250 0 500,000 39,669,200

59 Phùng Bá ớc 4,200,000 1,631,660 264,000 0 500,000 6,595,660




No. Name



Agricultural Land


Trees and Crops



Aquaculture land



HHs


AHs

Bonus for hand-over

ontime

60 Phùng Văn Uy 24,300,000 59,118,090 1,000,000 0 500,000 84,918,090

61 Quách Thị Tân 5,232,500 7,848,750 8,640,000 0 500,000 22,221,250

62 Quách Văn Hoạt 2,485,000 319,500 3,727,500 1,000,000 0 500,000 8,032,000

63 Quách Văn Sự 476,000 3,416,920 714,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 6,106,920

64 Tr ơng Công Chiến 35,100,000 2,516,500 622,000 0 500,000 38,738,500

65 Hoàng Khắc Hải 513,900 0 513,900

66 Bùi Văn An 1,947,000 45,000 0 1,992,000

67 Bùi Văn Định 1,477,000 189,900 2,215,500 1,000,000 0 500,000 5,382,400

68 Bùi Văn ớc 122,500 15,750 183,750 1,000,000 0 500,000 1,822,000

69 Đỗ Thị Huyền 20,926,780 483,000 0 21,409,780

70 Hà Hùng Tiến 17,405,020 6,024,500 0 23,429,520

71 Hà Văn Biên 7,528,500 5,551,250 11,292,750 1,000,000 0 500,000 25,872,500

72 H Đại Đoàn 752,400 0 752,400

73 Hoàng Duy Châu 660,000 2,303,500 0 2,963,500

74 Hoàng Duy T ơng 1,263,500 4,857,800 5,518,500 1,895,250 0 500,000 14,035,050

75 Hoàng Khắc Huy 9,312,750 0 9,312,750

76 Hoàng Kim Thành 7,160,400 340,000 0 7,500,400

77 Hoàng Thị Nhung 17,141,600 0 17,141,600

78 Lê Đăng Tình 665,000 971,520 1,230,500 997,500 0 500,000 4,364,520

79 Lê Đình Quế 127,200 1,240,000 0 1,367,200

80 Lê Đức Bình 3,034,500 4,551,750 0 500,000 8,086,250

81 Lê Gia Dũng 2,640,000 280,000 0 2,920,000

82 Lê Ngọc Hiền (Thảo) 4,329,600 643,000 0 4,972,600

83 Lê Thị Thảo (Lê Viết Khâm)

18,682,540 1,308,000 0 19,990,540

84 Lê Thị Tuyết 11,645,120 0 11,645,120

85 Lê Thị Xoan 2,299,500 295,650 3,449,250 1,000,000 0 500,000 7,544,400

86 Lê Văn X ởng 3,206,500 5,385,000 0 8,591,500

87 Lê Viết Khoa 880,000 0 0 880,000

88 Lê Viết Luận 3,454,000 1,637,500 0 5,091,500

89 Lê Xuân Chung 1,425,600 1,734,000 0 3,159,600

90 Lê Xuân Viết 1,211,000 328,700 1,816,500 1,000,000 0 500,000 4,856,200

91 Nguyễn Ngọc Thái 971,520 45,000 0 1,016,520




No. Name



Agricultural Land


Trees and Crops



Aquaculture land



HHs


AHs

Bonus for hand-over

ontime

92 Nguyễn Thị Hiền 20,890,148 900,000 0 21,790,148

93 Nguyễn Thị Lai 56,000 7,200 84,000 0 500,000 647,200

94 Nguyễn Văn Khánh 792,000 0 792,000

95 Nguyễn Văn Thìn 1,091,200 0 1,091,200

96 Nguyễn Văn Tuấn 0 309,760 0 0 0 309,760

97 Nguyễn Xuân Côi 2,334,500 0 90,000 3,501,750 0 500,000 6,426,250

98 Nguyễn Xuân Kính 1,505,000 0 193,500 2,257,500 0 500,000 4,456,000

99 Phạm Bá Nhàn 1,056,000 0 1,056,000

100 Phạm Đức Chí 4,570,000 0 4,570,000

101 Phạm Phúc Chiều 178,200 1,586,500 0 1,764,700

102 Phạm Thế Son 2,156,000 673,200 3,234,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 7,563,200

103 Phạm Thị Hoa 0 10,244,000 2,828,000 0 0 13,072,000

104 Đỗ Thị H ờng 3,960,000 0 3,960,000

105 Phạm Thị Tĩnh 72,091,040 0 72,091,040

106 Phạm Văn Đài 997,500 128,250 1,496,250 1,000,000 0 500,000 4,122,000

107 Phạm Văn Đào 2,611,000 335,700 3,916,500 1,000,000 0 500,000 8,363,200

108 Phạm Văn Dự 4,452,000 572,400 6,678,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 13,202,400

109 Phạm Văn Hạch 4,490,500 577,350 6,735,750 1,000,000 0 500,000 13,303,600

110 Phạm Văn Học 5,950,455 0 5,950,455

111 Phạm Văn H ng 3,797,500 488,250 5,696,250 1,000,000 0 500,000 11,482,000

112 Phạm Văn Khuyến 226,350 0 226,350

113 Phạm Văn Quý 308,000 0 308,000

114 Phạm Văn Tâm 2,397,500 308,250 3,596,250 1,000,000 0 500,000 7,802,000

115 Phạm Văn Tuân 15,882,470 10,000 0 15,892,470

116 Phạm Văn Viên 9,208,500 1,183,950 13,812,750 1,000,000 0 500,000 25,705,200

117 Phan Thị Sơn 234,500 30,150 351,750 0 616,400

118 Phạm Thị Thúy (Phùng Bá Bốn) 1,445,500 10,404,900 2,168,250 1,000,000 0 500,000 15,518,650

119 Phùng Bá Hoàn 7,836,000 1,020,000 0 8,856,000

120 Phùng Bá Thắng (Tuyết) 861,000 10,700,130 9,660,000 1,291,500 0 500,000 23,012,630

121 Phùng Bá Tiến 5,781,390 0 5,781,390

122 Phùng Bá Toan 580,800 145,000 0 725,800




No. Name



Agricultural Land


Trees and Crops



Aquaculture land



HHs


AHs

Bonus for hand-over

ontime

123 Phùng Bá Tuân 13,326,495 1,706,000 0 15,032,495

124 Quách Công Thạch 2,453,500 3,680,250 1,000,000 0 500,000 7,633,750

125 Quách Văn H ng 7,864,500 1,011,150 11,796,750 1,000,000 0 500,000 22,172,400

126 Quách Văn Toàn 497,000 63,900 745,500 1,000,000 0 500,000 2,806,400

127 Tạ Văn Tám 2,867,200 0 2,867,200

128 Trần Viết Hào 133,000 1,995,840 62,100 199,500 0 500,000 2,890,440

129 Trần Viết Phúc 5,950,455 0 5,950,455

130 Trịnh Hữu Thủy 1,298,880 2,462,000 0 3,760,880

131 Tr ơng Thi Thu 0 351,900 0 351,900

132 Tạ Xuân Tám 2,867,200 0 2,867,200

133 Bùi Quốc Toản 4,882,500 627,750 7,323,750 1,000,000 0 500,000 14,334,000

134 Bùi Thị Mạnh 3,430,000 441,000 5,145,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 10,516,000

135 Bùi Văn Dự 1,470,000 0 2,205,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 5,175,000

136 Bùi Văn Năm 6,685,000 859,500 10,027,500 8,640,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 27,712,000

137 Cao Thanh Chung 0 2,640,000 0 2,640,000

138 Cao Thị Thành 637,000 955,500 1,000,000 0 500,000 3,092,500

139 Đỗ Thị Tuyết 11,316,800 0 11,316,800

140 Đỗ Văn Ph ơng 3,997,000 5,995,500 0 500,000 10,492,500

141 Đỗ Văn Sơn 2,640,000 0 2,640,000

142 Đỗ Văn Tài 1,760,500 2,640,750 0 500,000 4,901,250

143 Hoàng Kim Danh 3,937,500 506,250 5,906,250 0 500,000 10,850,000

144 Hoàng Kim Lai 2,485,000 319,500 3,727,500 1,000,000 0 500,000 8,032,000

145 Hoàng Ngọc Thủy 15,262,000 0 15,262,000

146 Hoàng Thế Hùng 6,500,000 0 6,500,000

147 Hoàng Văn Huế (Bùi Thị Thảo) 809,600 0 809,600

148 Lê Đăng Đông 4,110,000 0 4,110,000

149 Lê Đăng Nam 22,710,500 62,000 0 22,772,500

150 Lê Đăng Sáng 2,684,500 345,150 4,026,750 0 500,000 7,556,400

151 Lê Thị Bảy 38,500 0 4,950 57,750 1,000,000 0 500,000 1,601,200

152 Lê Văn Viện 0 165,600 0 165,600

153 Lê Viết Ngọc 34,054,610 0 0 34,054,610

154 Lê Xuân Luận 1,168,640 2,711,000 0 3,879,640




No. Name



Agricultural Land


Trees and Crops



Aquaculture land



HHs


AHs

Bonus for hand-over

ontime

155 Nguyễn Thị Lâm 57,930,150 1,965,500 0 59,895,650

156 Nguyễn Thị Quyết 1,340,500 172,350 2,010,750 1,000,000 0 500,000 5,023,600

157 Nguyễn Văn Hảo 660,000 0 660,000

158 Nguyễn Văn Khoa 269,500 34,650 404,250 1,000,000 0 500,000 2,208,400

159 Nguyễn Văn Th ớng 1,284,500 0 165,150 1,926,750 1,000,000 0 500,000 4,876,400

160 Phạm Bá Đ ng 3,339,000 429,300 5,008,500 1,000,000 0 500,000 10,276,800

161 Phạm Bá Nhưn 6,475,000 1,150,500 9,712,500 1,000,000 0 500,000 18,838,000

162 Phạm Công Lý 2,103,500 270,450 3,155,250 1,000,000 0 500,000 7,029,200

163 Phạm Đăng C ờng 1,876,000 241,200 2,814,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 6,431,200

164 Phạm Điện Biên 2,712,500 348,750 4,068,750 1,000,000 0 500,000 8,630,000

165 Phạm Ngọc Hà 2,464,000 0 2,464,000

166 Phạm Ngọc Nghị 1,320,000 0 1,320,000

167 Phạm Quốc Hiệp 11,700,000 1,482,800 1,000,000 0 500,000 14,682,800

168 Phạm Thị Định 3,528,000 957,600 5,292,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 11,277,600

169 Phạm Thị Khoa 983,500 126,450 1,475,250 1,000,000 0 500,000 4,085,200

170 Phạm Thị Liên 3,209,500 0 4,814,250 1,000,000 0 500,000 9,523,750

171 Phạm Thị Xứng 2,191,000 281,700 3,286,500 1,000,000 0 500,000 7,259,200

172 Phạm Văn C ơng 2,772,000 0 2,772,000

173 Phạm Văn Hợi 2,200,000 0 2,200,000

174 Phạm Văn Khang 2,527,000 324,900 3,790,500 1,000,000 0 500,000 8,142,400

175 Phạm Văn Thành 9,369,500 796,500 14,054,250 1,000,000 0 500,000 25,720,250

176 Phạm Văn Uyên 4,343,500 558,450 6,515,250 1,000,000 0 500,000 12,917,200

177 Phạm Văn Việt 3,535,000 454,500 5,302,500 1,000,000 0 500,000 10,792,000

178 Phùng Bá Đại 19,500,000 880,000 1,244,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 23,124,000

179 Phùng Bá L ợng 22,200,000 1,145,760 1,000,000 0 500,000 24,845,760

180 Phùng Bá Quảng 17,100,000 1,655,000 622,000 0 500,000 19,877,000

181 Phùng Bá Sáu 25,800,000 10,018,800 0 500,000 36,318,800

182 Phùng Bá Thủy 4,333,000 29,250 6,499,500 19,440,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 31,801,750

183 Phùng Thị H ng 2,754,500 354,150 4,131,750 0 500,000 7,740,400

184 Tạ Quang Hùng 20,155,200 0 20,155,200

185 Trần Viết Dũng 2,640,000 0 2,640,000

186 Tr ơng Công Nông 448,000 209,700 672,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 2,829,700




No. Name



Agricultural Land


Trees and Crops



Aquaculture land



HHs


AHs

Bonus for hand-over

ontime

187 Tr ơng Công Thạch 6,891,500 886,050 10,337,250 1,000,000 0 500,000 19,614,800

188 Tr ơng Công Thanh 3,321,500 427,050 4,982,250 1,000,000 0 500,000 10,230,800

189 Tr ơng Công Tiên 2,425,500 311,850 3,638,250 1,000,000 0 500,000 7,875,600

190 Tr ơng Công Tình 3,300,000 701,196 1,000,000 0 500,000 5,501,196

191 Tr ơng Thị Toàn 959,000 2,772,000 0 1,438,500 0 500,000 5,669,500

192 Hoàng Thị Nguyệt 21,508,000 0 500,000 22,008,000

193 Phạm Văn Thắng 360,000 0 360,000

194 Phạm Xuân Cảnh 6,625,500 851,850 9,938,250 8,640,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 27,555,600

Cây Xăng Cẩm Thạch 84,524,000 84,524,000

UBND xư Cẩm Thạch 17,779,650 17,779,650




Annex 1 - Table 8: Summary compensation plan of Cam Thanh commune

No. Name



Agricultural Land


Trees and Crops Job training and

change of vocation


Aquaculture land



HHs


AHs

Bonus for hand-over

ontime

Total 11,508,492,712 904,708,160 21,547,750 8,550,639,668 1,535,525,268 1,348,506,600 2,743,818,220 422,640,000 120,000,000 507,000,000 115,000,000 27,777,416,138

1 Bùi Thị Bền 11,474,000 1,781,000 0 13,255,000

2 Bùi Trí Trung 8,496,000 1,343,500 0 9,839,500

3 Cao Đình Do 9,544,024 0 9,544,024

4 Cao Thị Chuyên 134,280,000 4,340,000 11,778,500 2,407,000 6,510,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 160,815,500

5 Cao Thị Lập 58,080,000 156,211,662 1,510,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 217,301,662

6 Cao Thị Ph ơng 6,208,785 3,394,500 0 9,603,285

7 Cao Tr ờng Sơn 88,320,000 17,493,825 3,185,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 110,498,825

8 Cao Vũ Hải 96,461,072 3,626,500 0 100,087,572

9 Đinh Hùng C ờng 86,880,000 40,269,874 6,455,500 0 500,000 134,105,374

10 Đinh Thị Bích 74,865,566 751,000 0 75,616,566

11 Đinh Thị Bình 8,520,000 81,822,150 982,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 92,824,150

12 Đinh Thị Hòa 87,120,000 32,835,520 3,355,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 124,810,520

13 Đinh Thị Thủy 6,960,000 6,895,200 304,500 0 500,000 14,659,700

14 Đinh Văn Minh 6,335,000 67,525,025 3,362,500 9,502,500 5,400,000 0 500,000 92,625,025

15 D ơng Minh H ng 30,480,000 62,704,120 8,105,000 0 500,000 101,789,120

16 D ơng Thị Dung 21,164,875 3,517,500 0 24,682,375

17 D ơng Trần Hanh 30,120,000 0 500,000 30,620,000

18 D ơng Văn Đức 4,976,100 130,500 0 5,106,600

19 D ơng Văn Hà 26,040,000 0 500,000 26,540,000

20 Hà Thế Hanh 14,280,000 3,654,400 2,568,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 22,002,400

21 Hà Thị Tuyến 1,281,800 361,000 0 1,642,800

22 Hà Văn Tr ờng 24,376,800 0 24,376,800

23 Hà Xuân Nam 109,446,850 24,488,500 0 133,935,350

24 Hoàng Bình Chung 46,320,000 3,188,500 30,312,230 3,140,000 4,782,750 0 500,000 88,243,480

25 Hoàng Thị Hoa 17,640,000 221,214,509 746,000 0 500,000 240,100,509

26 Lê Đăng Đông 13,920,000 0 500,000 14,420,000

27 Lê Đình Hóa 28,920,000 1,821,600 1,063,000 1,265,250 0 500,000 33,569,850

28 Lê Mạnh T ởng 8,612,415 225,500 0 8,837,915

29 Lê Trọng Nhất 21,275,728 1,359,500 0 22,635,228

30 Lê Văn Hữu 52,560,000 13,550,040 792,000 0 500,000 67,402,040




No. Name



Agricultural Land



change of vocation


Aquaculture land



HHs


AHs

Bonus for hand-over

ontime

31 Lê Văn Lợi (Hạnh) 18,036,480 3,537,000 0 21,573,480

32 Lê Văn Lợi (Tự) 3,231,800 0 3,231,800

33 Lê Văn Lợi 462,240

34 Lê Văn Thi 28,694,769 0 28,694,769

35 Lê Xuân Thanh 4,729,900 0 4,729,900

36 Nguyễn Đức Việt 2,521,050 663,500 0 3,184,550

37 Nguyễn Ngọc Hùng 3,109,920 638,000 0 3,747,920

38 Nguyễn Ngọc Thận 28,920,000 17,573,689 123,000 0 500,000 47,116,689

39 Nguyễn Quang Hòa 672,540 103,500 0 776,040

40 Nguyễn Quang Phê 151,121,920 400,000 0 151,521,920

41 Nguyễn Thị H ờng 4,646,760 0 4,646,760

42 Nguyễn Thị Mai 46,425,364 326,000 0 46,751,364

43 Nguyễn Thị Nhung 11,751,840 3,056,500 0 14,808,340

44 Nguyễn Thị Oanh 3,698,600 1,831,000 0 5,529,600

45 Nguyễn Thị Ph ơng 19,560,000 3,956,800 2,423,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 27,439,800

46 Nguyễn Thị Sử 48,994,320 2,972,000 0 51,966,320

47 Nguyễn Thị Thoa 35,280,000 59,851,658 998,000 0 500,000 96,629,658

48 Nguyễn Thị Th 3,029,788 734,000 0 3,763,788

49 Nguyễn Văn Thạch 1,080,000 3,195,500 315,000 580,000 4,793,250 0 500,000 10,463,750

50 Nguyễn Văn Trụ 50,640,000 4,126,500 4,052,500 6,189,750 1,000,000 0 500,000 66,508,750

51 Nguyễn Văn Trung 193,797,700 2,734,500 0 196,532,200

52 Nguyễn Văn Tuấn 55,320,000 125,356,464 501,000 0 500,000 181,677,464

53 Phạm Giao Tiên 738,500 1,410,000 1,107,750 1,000,000 0 500,000 4,756,250

54 Phạm Minh Th ợng 8,881,700 0 8,881,700

55 Phạm Thị Hợp 15,120,000 11,597,540 373,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 28,590,540

56 Phạm Thị Quế 11,035,900 735,000 0 11,770,900

57 Phạm Tuấn Tr ờng 73,071,980 0 73,071,980

58 Phạm Văn Thắng (Vân)

11,880,000 3,369,945 120,000 0 500,000 15,869,945

59 Phạm Văn Xuân 4,080,000 2,408,900 24,073,297 7,654,500 3,613,350 1,000,000 0 500,000 43,330,047

60 Phạm Xuân Hiệp 812,000 24,858,130 6,041,500 1,218,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 34,429,630

61 Phan Bá Ngọc 20,008,512 5,054,000 0 25,062,512

62 Phùng Bá Chung 39,480,000 900,000 2,612,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 44,492,000




No. Name



Agricultural Land



change of vocation


Aquaculture land



HHs


AHs

Bonus for hand-over

ontime

63 Quách Thị Minh 3,763,150 359,000 0 4,122,150

64 Vũ Viết Cẩm 13,440,000 7,185,400 0 500,000 21,125,400

65 Phạm Thị Phi 1,935,500 2,903,250 1,000,000 0 500,000 6,338,750

66 Phạm Bá Hải 19,880,000 3,263,760 29,820,000 7,560,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 62,023,760

67 Bùi Quyết Tâm 26,932,500 5,540,400 40,398,750 6,480,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 80,851,650

68 Đỗ Thị Liên 18,161,500 27,242,250 4,320,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 51,223,750

69 D ơng Thị Dung 2,971,500 4,457,250 2,160,000 0 500,000 10,088,750

70 Phạm Thị H ơng(Xuân) 0 862,000 0 0 862,000

71 Hà Văn Khanh 0 2,130,480 0 0 2,130,480

72 Hoàng Ngọc Long 413,000 619,500 0 500,000 1,532,500

73 Hà Thị Yên (2) 1,463,000 2,194,500 1,000,000 0 500,000 5,157,500

74 Phan Bá Thủy 3,020,500 621,360 4,530,750 1,000,000 0 500,000 9,672,610

75 Cao Bằng Thắm 1,176,000 18,282,388 980,000 1,764,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 23,702,388

76 Cao Minh Chiến 850,419 0 850,419

77 Cao Ngọc Thụy 213,500 124,186,606 2,928,150 320,250 1,000,000 0 500,000 129,148,506

78 Cao Thị Thu Hiền 24,100,000 1,046,500 14,071,058 7,403,780 1,569,750 1,000,000 0 500,000 49,691,088

79 Cao Thị Thuận 2,901,720 4,888,000 0 7,789,720

80 Cao Thị Xuân 10,849,628 6,305,000 0 17,154,628

81 Cao Văn Đề 381,500 5,516,640 13,323,500 5,259,250 1,000,000 0 500,000 25,980,890

82 Cao Văn Điệp 2,068,900 14,041,130 7,800,000 3,103,350 15,120,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 43,633,380

83 Cao Văn Dũng 35,600,000 77,698,738 1,400,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 116,198,738

84 Cao Văn Huê 18,140,580 4,448,500 0 22,589,080

85 Cao Văn Thái 34,800,000 179,717 2,487,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 38,966,717

86 Cao Văn Tuyền 1,327,700 1,724,275 6,315,000 1,991,550 1,000,000 0 500,000 12,858,525

87 D ơng Đình Ph ợng 14,200,000 1,482,300 509,000 0 500,000 16,691,300

88 D ơng Sơn Chung 15,700,000 0 500,000 16,200,000

89 D ơng Sơn Quang 23,500,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 25,000,000

90 Hà Mạnh Hùng 104,000,000 1,249,500 50,605,967 13,268,540 1,874,250 0 500,000 171,498,257

91 Hà Tân Ph ơng 8,600,000 1,331,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 11,431,000

92 Hà Thị Dung 21,300,000 2,708,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 25,508,000

93 Hà Thu Tím 2,984,100 340,000 0 3,324,100

94 Hà Văn Hiền 3,251,500 4,877,250 0 500,000 8,628,750




No. Name



Agricultural Land



change of vocation


Aquaculture land



HHs


AHs

Bonus for hand-over

ontime

95 Hà Văn Hiền (Dinh) 4,030,863 1,594,000 0 5,624,863

96 Hà Văn Nội 28,900,000 195,123,812 1,228,000 4,320,000 1,000,000 11,000,000 1,000,000 242,571,812

97 Hà Văn Thịnh 21,800,000 4,799,200 162,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 28,261,200

98 Hà Văn Thu 1,278,000 0 1,278,000

99 Hà Văn Tiến 2,900,000 1,791,990 1,000,000 0 500,000 6,191,990

100 Hà Xuân H ng 16,300,000 112,500 326,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 18,238,500

101 Hà Xuân Quang 7,430,500 5,905,098 17,383,000 11,145,750 1,000,000 0 500,000 43,364,348

102 Lê Thị Lý 88,400,000 1,669,500 17,552,179 22,245,880 2,504,250 1,000,000 0 500,000 133,871,809

103 Lê Thị Quyên 281,000 2,578,400 5,502,500 421,500 1,000,000 0 500,000 10,283,400

104 Bùi Thị Lâm (Lê Văn Phức) 16,000,000 2,928,740 197,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 20,625,740

105 Lê Văn Tài 26,700,000 752,400 40,000 0 500,000 27,992,400

106 Lê Xuân Tuân 18,100,000 3,105,300 713,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 23,418,300

107 L ơng Văn Hải 237,600,000 924,000 14,144,420 12,195,500 1,386,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 267,749,920

108 Phạm Phúc Long 2,607,500 10,041,318 9,927,500 35,946,250 1,000,000 0 500,000 60,022,568

109 Phạm Quốc Dân 58,200,000 38,639,397 6,769,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 105,108,397

110 Phạm Quốc Thành 5,647,154 1,822,000 0 7,469,154

111 Phạm Quốc Tiến 1,188,000 2,219,000 0 3,407,000

112 Phạm Thị Bình 623,000 3,916,000 934,500 0 5,473,500

113 Phạm Thị Công 46,200,000 246,996,567 6,610,200 1,000,000 0 500,000 301,306,767

114 Phạm Thị Dũng 9,600,000 1,529,950 1,672,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 14,301,950

115 Phạm Thị Thảo 1,436,340 0 1,436,340

116 Phạm Thị Thoa 12,700,000 1,670,400 1,486,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 17,356,400

117 Phạm Thị Thu 24,800,000 4,841,450 786,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 31,927,450

118 Phạm Thị Thùy Liên 14,580,000 0 500,000 15,080,000

119 Phạm Văn Ngọc 1,653,860 13,066,000 0 14,719,860

120 Phạm Văn Ph ợng 149,300,000 2,726,500 17,902,063 14,517,400 4,089,750 1,000,000 0 500,000 190,035,713

121 Quách Công C ờng 2,984,500 423,000 0 3,407,500

122 Tạ Thanh Lâm 4,087,900 23,317,278 18,890,500 6,131,850 0 500,000 52,927,528

123 Tạ Văn Mai 3,147,803 0 3,147,803

124 Trần Quốc Tuấn 42,500,000 14,746,389 2,556,500 1,000,000 0 500,000 61,302,889

125 Trần Văn Hùng 137,600,000 156,365,772 2,913,500 0 500,000 297,379,272

126 Trần Văn Miên 52,300,000 140,000 5,227,109 8,313,000 210,000 0 500,000 66,690,109




No. Name



Agricultural Land



change of vocation


Aquaculture land



HHs


AHs

Bonus for hand-over

ontime

127 Trần Văn Ngân 78,600,000 254,327,579 0 500,000 333,427,579

128 Trần Văn Nguyệt 74,900,000 4,210,414 1,063,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 81,673,414

129 Trần Xuân Đợi 133,000,000 2,750,000 14,065,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 151,315,000

130 Tr ơng Công Hoan 23,400,000 15,015,125 12,103,500 1,000,000 0 500,000 52,018,625

131 Tr ơng Công Hừng 52,500,000 9,138,500 77,073,648 11,277,900 13,707,750 1,000,000 0 500,000 165,197,798

132 Tr ơng Công Huy 30,100,000 5,153,660 750,500 1,000,000 0 500,000 37,504,160

133 Tr ơng Công Phú 73,500,000 5,475,725 12,651,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 93,126,725

134 Tr ơng Công Sự 5,743,500 1,546,000 8,615,250 6,480,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 23,884,750

135 Tr ơng Công Vọng 580,800 1,634,500 0 2,215,300

136 Tr ơng Ngọc L ơng 2,500,000 2,147,968 746,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 6,893,968

137 Vũ Thế Miên 20,292,689 15,677,000 0 35,969,689

138 Vũ Thị Hòa 6,569,360 1,530,000 0 8,099,360

139 Vũ Thị Tần 4,301,500 17,231,316 18,570,000 6,452,250 1,000,000 0 500,000 48,055,066

140 Vũ Văn Hùng 27,700,000 2,402,400 5,438,500 0 35,540,900

141 Vũ Văn Quyết 63,400,000 60,862,735 12,998,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 138,760,735

142 Bùi Trung Tuyến 3,143,000 3,996,560 4,714,500 0 500,000 12,354,060

143 Cao Thị Xuân 2,170,000 1,240,000 3,255,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 8,165,000

144 Cao Thị Thành 5,439,000 1,118,880 8,158,500 1,000,000 0 500,000 16,216,380

145 Hà Công Tránh 4,872,000 1,002,240 7,308,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 14,682,240

146 Phạm Phúc Khâm 10,444,000 9,812,500 15,666,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 37,422,500

147 Phạm Văn Hùng 206,500 309,750 1,000,000 0 500,000 2,016,250

148 Tr ơng Công Khoa 1,466,500 251,400 2,199,750 1,000,000 0 500,000 5,417,650

149 Phạm Thị Cúc 4,095,000 702,000 6,142,500 1,000,000 0 500,000 12,439,500

150 Cao Duy Đành 1,907,500 327,000 2,861,250 1,000,000 0 500,000 6,595,750

151 Trần Văn Quản 1,186,500 1,779,750 0 500,000 3,466,250

152 Tr ơng Thị Thanh 420,000 3,666,400 630,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 6,216,400

153 Tr ơng Công Sinh 280,000 160,000 420,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 2,360,000

154 Tr ơng Công Đức 770,000 440,000 1,155,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 3,865,000

155 Nguyễn Văn Hoán 2,744,000 4,116,000 0 500,000 7,360,000

156 Tạ Thanh Mai 1,522,500 2,283,750 0 500,000 4,306,250

157 Bùi Ngọc Xuyên 296,100,000 4,870,790 13,664,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 316,134,790

158 Bùi Văn Duyên 761,600 4,545,000 1,142,400 1,000,000 0 500,000 7,949,000




No. Name



Agricultural Land



change of vocation


Aquaculture land



HHs


AHs

Bonus for hand-over

ontime

159 Bùi Văn Hải 4,062,500 1,170,000 6,093,750 1,000,000 0 500,000 12,826,250

160 Bùi Văn Huấn 261,311,304 7,710,000 0 269,021,304

161 Bùi Văn Hùng 10,776,000 308,550 768,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 13,352,550

162 Bùi Văn Phong 28,700,000 6,712,510 11,386,500 1,000,000 0 500,000 48,299,010

163 Bùi Văn Thìn 8,892,500 11,262,000 13,338,750 15,120,000 1,000,000 0 800,000 50,413,250

164 Bùi Văn Thụ 2,712,500 1,200,000 4,068,750 1,000,000 0 500,000 9,481,250

165 Bùi Văn Th ơng 1,856,400 471,000 2,784,600 1,000,000 0 500,000 6,612,000

166 Cao Bằng Chắc 581,400 1,324,000 872,100 0 500,000 3,277,500

167 Cao Thị Hiền 6,752,300 98,388,744 7,614,500 10,128,450 0 500,000 123,383,994

168 Cao Văn Bút 563,500 1,650,000 845,250 1,000,000 0 500,000 4,558,750

169 Cao Văn Thủy 187,500 4,000,640 7,772,000 281,250 1,000,000 0 500,000 13,741,390

170 Hà Thị Đức 3,003,188 1,493,100 0 4,496,288

171 Hà Văn Nguyên 17,450,000 495,000 56,671,000 26,175,000 15,120,000 1,000,000 0 800,000 117,711,000

172 Hà Văn Thắng 2,118,336 7,015,500 0 9,133,836

173 Hà Xuân Dụng 4,887,000 26,535,751 21,508,500 7,330,500 1,000,000 0 500,000 61,761,751

174 Lê Thị Hằng (Khâm) 1,517,000 8,968,000 0 10,485,000

175 Lê Văn Vui 144,100,000 19,960,000 8,652,000 83,975,500 29,940,000 12,960,000 1,000,000 0 800,000 301,387,500

176 L ơng Thị Hằng 8,457,500 2,435,760 12,686,250 0 500,000 24,079,510

177 L ơng Văn Chung 44,900,000 5,089,100 1,560,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 53,049,100

178 Nguyễn Sỹ Quân 5,748,000 16,319,273 6,785,000 8,622,000 10,800,000 0 800,000 49,074,273

179 Phạm Đăng Dung 3,167,000 8,865,400 26,839,550 4,750,500 1,000,000 0 500,000 45,122,450

180 Phạm Phúc Tuyên 12,317,500 5,500,000 52,630,000 18,476,250 8,640,000 1,000,000 0 800,000 99,363,750

181 Phạm Văn Lâm 38,500,000 2,400,313 6,190,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 48,590,313

182 Phạm Văn Ly 22,400,000 6,533,500 6,546,875 13,639,560 9,800,250 10,800,000 1,000,000 0 800,000 71,520,185

183 Phạm Văn Minh (A) 52,500 12,034,000 78,750 1,000,000 0 500,000 13,665,250

184 Phạm Văn Minh 10,452,500 9,552,000 15,678,750 0 500,000 36,183,250

185 Phạm Văn Nhật 12,367,500 2,783,500 4,294,000 18,551,250 1,000,000 0 500,000 39,496,250

186 Phạm Văn Tâm 148,100,000 3,554,000 63,122,780 18,551,000 5,331,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 240,158,780

187 Phạm Văn Thắng 23,500,000 158,053,978 3,285,500 1,000,000 0 500,000 186,339,478

188 Phạm Văn Tình 103,220,000 2,400,060 93,424,066 37,247,500 69,389,970 4,320,000 1,000,000 63,000,000 1,000,000 375,001,596

189 Trần Văn Đình 1,885,200 24,333,140 6,585,000 3,883,500 1,000,000 0 500,000 38,186,840

190 Trần Văn Thái (Mông) 505,500 0 505,500




No. Name



Agricultural Land



change of vocation


Aquaculture land



HHs


AHs

Bonus for hand-over

ontime

191 Trần Văn Tuấn 3,785,108 3,791,000 0 7,576,108

192 Bùi Quang Thụ 96,900,000 88,445,950 0 500,000 185,845,950

193 Bùi Quốc Hậu 1,920,000 2,142,375 129,500 0 500,000 4,691,875

194 Bùi Thị Chinh 303,204,500 237,695,284 6,179,000 281,147,750 0 500,000 828,726,534

195 Cao Thị Dậu 4,175,200 6,120,000 8,738,800 22,472,400 0 500,000 42,006,400

196 Đặng Ngọc Toản 808,350,600 112,094,541 16,588,500 92,174,700 0 500,000 1,029,708,341

197 Đặng Thị Mai 16,696,600 18,197,380 25,044,900 1,000,000 0 500,000 61,438,880

198 Đỗ Văn C ơng 3,000,000 1,224,960 0 500,000 4,724,960

199 Đỗ Văn Xuyên 474,000,000 145,585,527 2,469,000 4,320,000 63,000,000 1,000,000 690,374,527

200 Đỗ Xuân Cần 145,107,505 3,873,040 0 148,980,545

201 D ơng Thị Thanh 12,000,000 14,119,000 8,882,300 21,178,500 10,800,000 0 500,000 67,479,800

202 Hà Thị Hiền 32,720,000 262,688,145 20,933,000 5,400,000 11,000,000 1,000,000 333,741,145

203 Hà Thị Nga 133,200,000 21,617,937 1,456,500 0 500,000 156,774,437

204 Hà Thị Ngân 245,400,000 7,265,500 0 500,000 253,165,500

205 Hà Thị Tĩnh 3,920,000 311,223,504 98,000 2,160,000 11,000,000 1,000,000 329,401,504

206 Hà Thị Yên 249,300,000 0 500,000 249,800,000

207 Hà Thọ Mai 624,000,000 11,263,000 0 500,000 635,763,000

208 Hà Văn Dũng 1,810,500 2,923,200 2,224,000 2,715,750 0 500,000 10,173,450

209 Hà Văn Thanh 108,000,000 465,184,317 39,987,000 8,640,000 1,000,000 11,000,000 1,000,000 634,811,317

210 Hoàng Thị H ng 16,840,000 150,683,975 4,320,000 63,000,000 1,000,000 235,843,975

211 Lê Khắc Hòa 349,200,000 0 500,000 349,700,000

212 Lê Thị Thúy 433,200,000 2,366,000 0 500,000 436,066,000

213 Lê Tr ờng Sơn 497,700,000 229,800,200 1,378,000 3,600,000 63,000,000 1,000,000 796,478,200

214 Lê Văn Mến 4,080,000 262,401,476 1,516,500 4,320,000 63,000,000 1,000,000 336,317,976

215 Lê Văn Thanh 1,200,000 1,864,900 886,875 6,084,500 2,797,350 0 500,000 13,333,625

216 Lê Việt Hùng 78,000,000 9,128,600 27,854,966 9,977,700 13,692,900 10,800,000 0 500,000 149,954,166

217 Mai Xuân Tiến 6,313,800 5,033,000 9,470,700 12,960,000 0 500,000 34,277,500

218 Ngô Văn Dung 1,220,000 2,737,500 114,000 0 500,000 4,571,500

219 Nguyễn Đăng Khoa 499,500,000 15,711,500 91,462,470 16,368,080 23,567,250 15,120,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 663,229,300

220 Nguyễn Quốc Đức 6,905,400 22,651,510 605,847,300 0 500,000 635,904,210

221 Nguyễn Thị Sáu 78,300,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 79,800,000

222 Nguyễn Trọng Huy 180,000,000 62,046,400 0 500,000 242,546,400




No. Name



Agricultural Land



change of vocation


Aquaculture land



HHs


AHs

Bonus for hand-over

ontime

223 Nguyễn Văn Chi 56,700,000 3,675,000 181,318,560 4,589,040 5,512,500 6,480,000 1,000,000 11,000,000 1,000,000 271,275,100

224 Nguyễn Văn Hào 127,200,000 18,130,150 5,624,000 0 500,000 151,454,150

225 Nguyễn Văn Lễ 14,940,000 0 500,000 15,440,000

226 Nguyễn Văn Sơn 14,400,000 3,195,500 3,806,400 123,000 4,793,250 0 500,000 26,818,150

227 Nguyễn Văn Vĩnh 4,401,000 650,000 0 500,000 5,551,000

228 Phạm Minh Hải 3,337,100 6,500,000 292,781,450 1,000,000 0 500,000 304,118,550

229 Phạm Thanh Hà 1,616,700 4,418,000 141,841,650 1,000,000 0 500,000 149,376,350

230 Phan Thị Lâm 93,900,000 47,431,276 0 1,000,000 0 500,000 142,831,276

231 Phùng Thị H ng 75,720,000 0 500,000 76,220,000

232 Tô Văn An 42,844,100 350,144,090 7,255,500 15,307,950 5,400,000 1,000,000 63,000,000 1,000,000 485,951,640

233 Trần Tuấn Phán 1,001,400,000 332,605,040 21,473,500 6,480,000 1,000,000 11,000,000 1,000,000 1,374,958,540

234 Trịnh Đình Tâm 11,313,500 54,848,000 5,343,000 593,293,250 0 500,000 665,297,750

235 Trịnh Đình Trung 7,510,600 8,541,000 393,864,700 1,000,000 0 500,000 411,416,300

236 Trịnh Văn Khải 358,800,000 2,835,700 0 500,000 362,135,700

237 Tr ơng Công Tâm 282,300,000 7,353,500 50,530,289 13,596,000 11,030,250 1,000,000 0 500,000 366,310,039

238 Phạm Văn Bằng 19,463,500 29,195,250 12,960,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 63,118,750

239 Lê Kim Nghìn 20,128,500 4,140,720 30,192,750 21,600,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 77,561,970

240 Lê Văn Lợi 64,520,000 235,714,163 10,295,500 6,480,000 1,000,000 63,000,000 1,000,000 382,009,663

241 Tô Thị Lộc 0 1,981,440 0 0 1,981,440

242 Bùi Thị Lục 40,306,000 60,459,000 12,960,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 115,225,000

243 Vũ Anh Muôn 8,592,500 12,888,750 8,640,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 31,621,250

244 Nguyễn Thị Hà 12,257,000 10,061,000 18,385,500 8,640,000 0 500,000 49,843,500

245 Hà Ngọc D ơng 5,796,000 1,192,320 8,694,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 17,182,320

246 Tr ơng Công Doanh 5,659,500 1,164,240 8,489,250 10,800,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 27,612,990

247 Vũ Thị Thanh 66,500 13,680 99,750 0 500,000 679,930

248 Hoàng Thị Dần 5,341,000 1,756,080 8,011,500 1,000,000 0 500,000 16,608,580

249 Quách Thị H ơng 0 1,103,040 0 0 1,103,040

250 Hà Văn Phú 7,070,000 10,605,000 0 500,000 18,175,000

251 Cao Tr ơng Giang 11,616,500 6,278,400 17,424,750 1,000,000 0 500,000 36,819,650

252 Trần Văn Nậu 0 4,647,600 0 0 4,647,600

253 Cao Bá Quyết 5,362,000 8,043,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 14,905,000

254 Nguyễn Văn Quý 18,119,500 27,179,250 17,280,000 0 500,000 63,078,750




No. Name



Agricultural Land



change of vocation


Aquaculture land



HHs


AHs

Bonus for hand-over

ontime

255 Cao Bằng Mạnh 20,660,500 4,250,160 30,990,750 21,600,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 79,001,410

256 Hà Minh Duyên 0 3,727,440 0 0 3,727,440

257 Nguyễn Văn Bảo 0 3,000,000 0 0 3,000,000

258 Nguyễn Thị Chí 0 947,600 0 0 947,600

259 Lê Đức Hiệu 4,350,500 1,180,850 6,525,750 10,800,000 0 500,000 23,357,100

260 Tr ơng Văn C ơng 6,979,000 706,000 10,468,500 10,800,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 30,453,500

261 Tr ơng Văn Xuân 7,381,500 31,650,000 11,072,250 10,800,000 1,000,000 0 500,000 62,403,750

262 Hoàng Khắc Đức 1,708,500 4,548,750 2,562,750 10,800,000 0 500,000 20,120,000

263 Hà Mạnh C ờng 5,752,800 74,241,000 8,629,200 8,640,000 0 500,000 97,763,000

264 Tr ơng Công Tuyết 119,960,000 4,427,500 25,156,500 6,641,250 1,000,000 0 500,000 157,685,250

265 Tr ơng Công Lý 7,442,600 14,693,000 11,163,900 8,640,000 0 500,000 42,439,500

266 Nguyễn Đình Lập 2,706,400 44,874,000 4,059,600 0 500,000 52,140,000

267 Hà Văn Nh 6,030,500 4,763,050 9,045,750 0 500,000 20,339,300

268 Nguyễn Mạnh Hùng 0 5,865,000 0 0 5,865,000

269 L u Văn Sáng 0 610,000 0 0 610,000

270 Nguyễn Văn Tuyến 0 56,995,000 0 0 56,995,000

271 Quách Công Định 12,681,600 19,022,400 1,000,000 0 500,000 33,204,000

272 Hoàng Thị Nga 120,501,500 43,999,250 0 164,500,750

273 Đỗ Xuân Thịnh 94,841,000 0 94,841,000

274 Trần Văn Chúc 170,684,000 0 170,684,000

275 Nguyễn Quốc Sơn 13,981,030 0 13,981,030

276 Bùi Văn Quân (Phạm Thị Hinh) 15,500,000 63,000 94,500 0 500,000 16,157,500

277 Hà Văn Để 0 0 456,789 0 0 456,789

278 Phạm Thị H ng 6,520,000 0 0 0 500,000 7,020,000

279 Lê Hải L u 122,804,500 184,206,750 4,320,000 0 800,000 312,131,250

280 Phạm Văn Hoạt 98,000 147,000 0 500,000 745,000

281 Phạm Văn Thanh 81,462,500 122,193,750 6,480,000 0 800,000 210,936,250

282 Lê Thị Hoa 0 0 456,789 0 0 456,789

283 Nguyễn Đăng Ngọc 20,000,000 5,526,500 8,289,750 0 500,000 34,316,250

284 Lê Thị Ngà 20,000,000 41,653,500 62,480,250 0 800,000 124,933,750

285 Nguyễn Thị Nga 20,000,000 651,000 976,500 0 500,000 22,127,500

286 Nguyễn Đăng Tuất 20,000,000 4,035,500 6,053,250 0 500,000 30,588,750




No. Name



Agricultural Land



change of vocation


Aquaculture land



HHs


AHs

Bonus for hand-over

ontime

287 Nguyễn Thị Dân 28,860,000 0 0 0 500,000 29,360,000

Trạm y tế xư Cẩm Thành

1,112,068 138,000 1,250,068

Tr ờng MN xư Cẩm Thành

4,979,520 1,801,000 6,780,520

Tr ờng THCS xư Cẩm Thành

1,795,200 1,795,200

UBND xư Cẩm Thành 21,547,750 21,547,750



CAM THUY’s UREMDP - Annex 2: SES summary tables P a g e | 1 5 2

A. Annex 2: SES summary tables

Annex 2 – Table 1: Classification of Affected Households by Age and Gender of the Head

Commune/ town Number of surveyed

households

Head of the HHs

Age of the Head

Male Female <30 30 - <40

40 - <50

50 - <60

≥60

Total 353 286 67 7 54 86 124 82

% 100% 81 19 2.0 15.3 24.4 35.1 23.2

Cam Thuy town 83 64 19 2 7 18 28 28

Cam Binh commune 160 133 27 5 31 36 61 27

Cam Thach commune 51 44 7 11 13 17 10

Cam Thanh commune 59 45 14 5 19 18 17

Annex 2 - Table 2: Average Households size

# Commune/ town Average HH size No. of SES AHs No. of APs

Total 4.28 353 1,413

1 Cam Thuy town 4.10 83 341

2 Cam Binh commune 4.18 160 669

2 Cam Thach commune 3.33 51 170

2 Cam Thanh commune 3.94 59 233

Annex 2 - Table 3: Education Attainment of Households Heads

Commune/ town

Total

Number of

surveyed HHs

Academic level of HHs head

Illiterate Pre

school Primary School

Lower Secondary

Upper Secondary

/ Vocational

School

College/ Universit

y

Total 353 5 63 132 96 16 41

% 100% 1.4% 17.8% 37.4% 27.2% 4.5% 11.6%

Cam Thuy town

83 4 13 24 26 7 10

Cam Binh commune

160 0 16 21 9 3 10

Cam Thach commune

51 0 2 28 11 1 9

Cam Thanh commune

59 1 32 59 50 5 12




Annex 2 - Table 4: Education and Literacy level of other Households members

Commune/ town

Total

Number of

surveyed HHs

Academic level of other HH members

Illiterate Pre

school Primary School

Lower Secondary

Upper Secondary/ Vocational

School

College/ University

other

Total 1,413 40 214 401 404 75 215 64

% 2.8 15.1 28.4 28.6 5.3 15.2 4.5

Cam Thuy town

341 18 40 70 106 19 65 23

Cam Binh commune

669 7 108 195 202 43 89 25

Cam Thach commune

170 4 23 73 45 5 15 5

Cam Thanh commune

233 11 43 63 51 8 46 11

Annex 2 - Table 5: Occupations of Households Heads Disaggregated by Gender

Occupation HHs headed by

men HHs headed by

women Total

State Employee 22 4 26

Private 4 1 5

Business/service 77 12 89

Hired labor 39 5 44

Farming 90 34 124

Retired 26 4 30

Jobless 3 0 3

Livestock 12 3 15

Other 13 4 17

Total surveyed HHs 286 67 353

Annex 2 - Table 6: Classification of Households by Income

Commune/ town

Total

Number of

surveyed HHs

Average income of

HHs (VND/month)

Affected HHs by income

(1000 VND/HH/month)

< 1 1-2 2-3 3-5 5-7 > 7

Total 353 8,019,000 9 13 38 54 76 163

% 2.5 3.7 10.8 15.3 21.5 46.2

Cam Thuy town 83 9,746,000 0 6 5 11 14 47

Cam Binh commune 160 9,155,000 1 1 6 21 41 90

Cam Thach commune

51 4,705,000 5 3 18 8 5 12

Cam Thanh commune

59 5,375,000 3 3 9 14 16 14




Annex 2 - Table 7: Average Households Income by Gender of Households Head

Commune/ town

Total

Number of surveyed

HHs

Income/HH/month (VND)

Average HH headed by men HH headed by women

Cam Thuy town 83 3,343,000 3,648,000 2,316,000

Cam Binh commune

160 3,558,000 3,789,000 2,415,000

Cam Thach commune

51 2,921,000 3,022,000 2,286,000

Cam Thanh commune

59 2,236,000 2,257,000 2,229,000

Annex 2 – Table 8: Classification of Households by Level of Expenditure

Commune/ town

Total

Number of

surveyed HHs

Average expenditure

of HHs (VND/month)

Affected HHs by expenditure

(1000 VND/HH/month)

< 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 3 - 5 5 - 7 > 7

Total 353 4,399,000 6 9 52 178 86 22

% 100% 1.7 2.5 14.7 50.4 24.4 6.2

Cam Thuy town 83 4,685,000 1 1 9 41 24 7

Cam Binh commune

160 4,420,000 2 4 24 80 40 2

Cam Thach commune

51 4,215,000 1 3 9 25 10 3

Cam Thanh commune

59 4,100,000 2 1 10 32 12 10

Annex 2 – Table 9: Savings

Savings

Number of HHs in

Cam Thuy Town

Cam Binh commune

Cam Thach commune

Cam Thanh commune

HHs with savings in bank or elsewhere 7 10 2 1

HHs without savings in bank or elsewhere 76 150 49 58

Total 83 160 51 59




Annex 2 – Table 10: Loans

Loans

Number of HHs in

Cam Thuy Town

Cam Binh commune

Cam Thach

commune

Cam Thanh

commune Total

HHs without loans 54 116 34 55 259

HHs with loans 29 44 17 4 94

Purposes of loans:

Studying 4 9 4 0 17

Building house 4 6 2 0 12

Cultivating 2 4 1 1 8

Business 4 17 6 1 28

Going to hospital 0 0 0 0 0

Breeding and animal raising 15 8 4 2 29

Annex 2 – Table 11: Types of Businesses

Businesses type Cam Thuy Town Cam Binh commune

Cam Thach commune

Cam Thanh commune

Market Stall 4 1 1 2

Small shop 1 6 0 0

Larger General store

28 26 8 5

Specialized product

1 11 0 0

Service 0 1 0 0

Other 0 0 0 0

Total 34 45 9 7



Cam Thuy’s UREMDP - Annex 2: SES summary tables and meeting minute P a g e | 1 5 6

Annex 2 - Table 12: Occupations of other Households members

Occupation Cam Thuy Town Cam Binh commune Cam Thach commune Cam Thanh commune Total

Q.ty % Q.ty % Q.ty % Q.ty % Q.ty %

State Employee 47 13.8 42 6.3 17 10.0 27 11.6 133 9.4

Private 0 0.0 40 6.0 5 2.9 23 9.9 68 4.8

Business/service 92 27.0 81 12.1 35 20.6 30 12.9 238 16.8

Hired labor 46 13.5 89 13.3 15 8.8 8 3.4 158 11.2

Farming 35 10.3 189 28.3 29 17.1 77 33.0 330 23.4

student 47 13.8 158 23.6 49 28.8 42 18.0 296 20.9

Retired 21 6.2 18 2.7 10 5.9 7 3.0 56 4.0

Jobless 4 1.2 18 2.7 4 2.4 5 2.1 31 2.2

Livestock 26 7.6 9 1.3 1 0.6 3 1.3 39 2.8

Other 23 6.7 25 3.7 5 2.9 11 4.7 64 4.5

Total surveyed HHs 341 100 669 100 170 100 233 100 1,413 100

Annex 2 – Table 13: Average Monthly Household Income – Sources of Income

Income source Average Amount (VND)

Cam Thuy Town % Cam Binh commune % Cam Thach commune % Cam Thanh commune %

Pensions 5,485,000 56.3% 5,113,000 55.8% 4,000,000 85.0% 2,800,000 52.1%

Employment 8,375,000 85.9% 6,131,000 67.0% 3,312,000 70.4% 4,578,000 85.2%

Business activities 7,879,000 80.8% 7,259,000 79.3% 5,150,000 109.5% 3,485,000 64.8%

Agriculture 2,913,000 29.9% 2,792,000 30.5% 1,291,000 27.4% 1,681,000 31.3%

afforestation 0 0.0% 300,000 3.3% 0 0.0% 500,000 9.3%

Livestock 1,970,000 20.2% 1,892,000 20.7% 1,750,000 37.2% 1,750,000 32.6%

Social assistance 1,666,000 17.1% 2,038,000 22.3% 1,532,000 32.6% 1,037,000 19.3%

Subsidies from other members 2,916,000 29.9% 2,642,000 28.9% 2,500,000 53.1% 2,100,000 39.1%

Savings 0 0.0% 812,000 8.9% 1,000,000 21.3% 1,000,000 18.6%

Other (…) 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Average 9,746,000 100.0% 9,155,000 100.0% 4,705,000 100.0% 5,375,000 100.0%




Annex 2 – Table 14: Household Monthly Expenditures (VND) - Categories of Expenditure

Expenditure category

Average (VND)

Cam Thuy Town

% Cam Binh commune

% Cam Thach commune

% Cam Thanh commune

% Average

Total %

Food and drink 2,861,000 61.1% 2,571,000 58.2% 2,604,000 61.8% 2,396,000 58.4% 2,608,000 59.9%

Electricity and cooking fuel 332,000 7.1% 336,000 7.6% 353,000 8.4% 466,000 11.4% 371,750 8.6%

Medical care 18,000 0.4% 260,000 5.9% 249,000 5.9% 296,000 7.2% 205,750 4.9%

Clothing and footwear 236,000 5.0% 237,000 5.4% 249,000 5.9% 250,000 6.1% 243,000 5.6%

Education 1,065,000 22.7% 851,000 19.3% 955,000 22.7% 640,000 15.6% 877,750 20.1%

Transportation and communication 315,000 6.7% 319,000 7.2% 333,000 7.9% 358,000 8.7% 331,250 7.6%

Festival/ events 275,000 5.9% 259,000 5.9% 273,000 6.5% 315,000 7.7% 280,500 6.5%

Assistance for family members outside the HH 120,000 2.6% 1,128,000 25.5% 1,475,000 35.0% 1,025,000 25.0% 937,000 22.0%

Rent 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Other furnitures 446,000 9.5% 449,000 10.2% 440,000 10.4% 533,000 13.0% 467,000 10.8%

Pay back debts 500,000 10.7% 466,000 10.5% 580,000 13.8% 0.0% 386,500 8.8%

Other 357,000 7.6% 361,000 8.2% 438,000 10.4% 475,000 11.6% 407,750 9.5%

Average Amount 4,685,000 100.0% 4,420,000 100.0% 4,215,000 100.0% 4,100,000 100.0% 4,355,000 100.0%

Annex 2 – Table 15: Accessing Work Opportunities in the Project

Item

Cam Thuy Town Cam Binh commune Cam Thach commune Cam Thanh commune

HH % HH % HH % HH %

Total of HHs 83 100 160 100 51 100 59 100

HH not interested in project road work 76 91.1 160 100 51 100 57 96.4

HH interested in project road work 7 8.9 0 0 0 0 2 3.6

In which:

HHs with only male members interested 1 1.2 0 0 0 0 1 1.7

HHs with only female members interested 6 7.2 0 0 0 0 1 1.7

HHs with both male and female members interested 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0




Annex 2 – Table 16: Asset Ownership of Affected Households

Types of assets

Cam Thuy Town Cam Binh commune Cam Thach commune Cam Thanh commune Average

HHs No./HH HHs No./HH HHs No./HH HHs No./HH HHs No./HH

Electric fan 75 1.86 159 2.11 50 2.16 58 2.00 342 2.04

Telephone 10 0.12 11 0.08 5 0.14 2 0.07 28 0.10

Mobile 73 1.81 159 2.42 51 2.33 57 2.00 340 2.19

Motorbike 70 1.22 148 1.44 48 1.65 55 1.27 321 1.39

Tivi 74 1.02 157 1.03 50 1.24 54 0.93 335 1.04

Bike 59 0.80 116 0.78 33 0.67 48 0.95 256 0.79

Rice cooker 69 0.83 148 0.94 45 0.90 55 0.95 317 0.91

Radio 2 0.02 8 0.05 1 0.02 0 0.00 11 0.03

CD/DVD player 17 0.20 21 0.13 17 0.33 5 0.08 60 0.17

Refrigerator 61 0.76 145 0.92 47 0.94 55 0.93 308 0.89

Electric Stove/Hotplate 7 0.08 17 0.11 5 0.10 3 0.05 32 0.09

Microwave 9 0.11 11 0.07 10 0.20 9 0.15 39 0.11

Car 3 0.04 14 0.09 0 0.00 7 0.12 24 0.07

Buffalo 20 0.40 30 0.37 8 0.37 0 0.00 58 0.31

pig 22 2.01 27 1.28 8 1.45 2 0.10 59 1.28

Chickens 35 12.37 74 12.31 16 8.57 20 3.83 145 10.37

Ducks 5 1.40 11 1.41 2 0.65 0 0.00 18 1.06




Annex 2 – Table 17: Living Conditions and Energy Sources

Living conditions Cam Thuy Town Cam Binh commune Cam Thach commune Cam Thanh commune

HHs % HHs % HHs % HHs %

Surveyed households 75 100 160 100 51 100 59 100

Drinking water

Rain water 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Tradition/shallow well 40 53.3 70 43.8 29 56.9 24 40.7

Deep well 25 33.3 55 34.4 20 39.2 35 59.3

Canal, river, pond, stream 4 5.3 29 18.1 1 2.0 0 0

Piped water 6 8.0 6 3.8 1 2.0 0 0

Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Toilet Pit latrine 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Semi-septic tank 33 44 64 40 28 54.9 32 54.2

Septic tank 42 56 96 60 23 45.1 27 45.8

Cooking

Electricity 0 0 2 1.2 2 3.9 2 3.4

Gas/Kerosene 69 92 152 95 47 92.2 53 89.8

Wood 6 8 6 3.8 2 3.9 4 6.8

Coal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Biogas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lighting Electricity 100 100 100 100

Annex 2 – Table 18 Opinions about Expected Project Impacts

Impacts Cam Thuy Town Cam Binh commune Cam Thach commune Cam Thanh commune

HHs % HHs % HHs % HHs %

Total of Aps 83 100 160 100 51 100 59 100

Primarily positive impacts: 83 100.0% 160 100% 51 100% 59 100%

Increased business 41 49.4% 83 51.9% 23 45.1% 22 37.3%

Better transport for education/health 37 44.6% 62 38.8% 27 52.9% 34 57.6%

Other 5 6.0% 15 9.4% 1 2.0% 3 5.1%

Primarily negative impacts: 83 100.0% 160 100.0% 51 100% 59 100%

Increased traffic problem 46 55.4% 103 64.4% 37 72.5% 35 59.3%

Increased social problems 28 33.7% 38 23.8% 10 19.6% 18 30.5%

Other 9 10.8% 19 11.9% 4 7.8% 6 10.2%



CAMTHUY’S UREMDP - Annex 3: Public information booklet P a g e | 1 6 0

A. Annex 3: Public information booklet

1/ What is the Second Northern Greater Mekong Sub-region Transport Network

Improvement Project?

GMS Second Transport Network Improvement Project. The proposed Project covers

Vietnam and Laos. The Project in Vietnam consists of a main and a complementary

component. The main component involves in the upgrading of National Road 217 (QL217)

that totals to about 195km in length; while the complementary component includes 19 local

roads that total to 109.5km. The Project road traverses through Ha Trung, Vinh Loc, Cam

Thuy, Ba Thuoc and Quan Son districts from east to west in Thanh Hoa Province.

2/- What are The scope of land acquisition and the effects on people?

Based on the preliminary results of the feasibility study, the project will need approximately

91.3 ha of land (including residential land, gardens, agricultural land, aquaculture and forest

land). It is estimated that around 1,500 households may be identified as affected by land

acquisition.

3/- Affected Person/ Affected Household (AP/AH), Who are they?

“Affected Person/ Affected Household (AP/AH)” Refer to any person or persons, household,

firm, private or public institution that, on account of changes resulting from the Project, will

have its (i) standard of living adversely affected; (ii) right, title or interest in any house, land,

water resources or any other moveable or fixed assets acquired, possessed, restricted or

otherwise adversely affected, in full or in part, permanently or temporarily; and/or (iii) business,

occupation, place of work or residence or habitat adversely affected, with or without

displacement

The cut-off date is the date on which decision on land recovery is issued by Thanh Hoa

Peoples Committee and published broadly by the District Peoples Committee to local

communities and displaced persons.

4/- When the project building?

The project will be build on Q4, 2017.

5/- What is The Resettlement and Ethnic Minorities Development Plan (REMDP)?

The Project’s REMDP was prepared to identify impacts and and mitigation measures to

improve or at least restore the livelihoods of all affected households and to improve the living

standards of vulnerable groups of the poor and displaced households by compensating for

lost assets at specific prices and by providing different forms of support when needed. The

prepared REMDP will be updated after the land acquisition notice.

Unlimited activities will include:

Further consultation with affected households.

Efforts to step out of the influence corridor (COI) based on detailed design

Household censuses affected in the COI

The DMS activities will determine the actual area of land to be compensated, including

assets on land, structures, plants and livestock. The DMS will also determine the

socio-economic conditions of each household in the presence of the household head




(regardless of ownership status)

Specific price surveys by experts to determine the market value of land items, assets,

trees not included in the price list of Thanh Hoa PPC at the time of compensation

Prepare compensation plan for AHs.

Consultation and information disclosure to local communities involves the establishment

of a grievance mechanism to allow households to raise their concerns, questions, or any

complaints in REMDP implementation

An external monitoring organization (EMO) has been mobilized by PMU-TL to conduct

independent monitoring for update/ implementation REMDP’s. The above activities are expected to start from August 2017 to June 2018, under the guidance

of the DCARB, with the support of the Project Consutance. Local communities will be informed

before carrying out various activities. The project encourages communities and individuals to

participate in all REMDP activities.

6/- What is the land use right and claim of the household?

Lack of legal basis for LURCs (LURCs, contracts, etc.) does not prevent affected households

from receiving compensation. Households without LURCs will be compensated or assisted for

their Non-land assets and will be provided with support in accordance with regulations.

7/- Who are The Vulnerable People?

Means individuals or distinct groups of people who might suffer disproportionately or face the

risk of being further marginalized by the effects of land and property recovery or resettlement

and specifically includes: (i) female headed households with dependents (ii) households with

disabled persons, (iii) households falling under the current MOLISA benchmark poverty line,

(iv) children and elderly households who are with no other means of support, (v) landless

households, and (vi) non-integrated and vulnerable ethnic minorities.

8/- How is your affected land compensation by The project?

Those who already have LURCs or are eligible for issuance of LURCs but have not been issued,

will be compensated based on the principles of specific cost price corresponding to the unit price

paid by Thanh Hoa PPC issued at the time of land recovery (including related charges and fees).

For displaced households, compensation may be in the form of cash or land (if any).

9/- How to Compensation, support you’re your structures and plants?

Compensation for works, structures and crops and crops, based on specific pricing principles

established by the Thanh Hoa PPC at the time of land acquisition.

10/- Who will be supported and what are the supported?

The project will support severely affected households: (i) losing 30% or more of their total area

of productive land; (ii) those who lose more than 10% but are heavily dependent on production

land or below the minimum residential land quota; and (ii) displaced households including

those engaged in business activities; and (iii) vulnerable households. The level of support will

depend on the level of impact on each household.

11/- What purpose and household will gain from consultations and community

information?




Consultation and information disclosure is an indispensable part of the REMDP. Information in

addition to notifying the status of the project implementation, as well as a channel for

households, communities to express their views, concerns, and proposals. Consultations have

been conducted during the feasibility study and will continue during REMDP update and

implementation.

12/- If you have questions and comments about land acquisition, compensation,

support or other questions about REMDP, how do you do??

You can specify or write an application for the staff of your village. They will try to help you and

resolve your concerns/requests/complaints in a timely and satisfactory manner.

If you think your complaint has not been resolved at the commune level, you can file your

complaint to the District, and to the provincial level, and finally, you can file your complaint with

the court.

Affected households may also lodge a complaint directly to the Southeast Asia Department via

Vietnam Resident Mission Office in Hanoi. If the complainant is still not satisfied with the

Southeast Asia Department’s response, the complainant may lodge a complaint to the Office of the Special Project Facilitator through the office of Vietnam Resident Mission in Hanoi.

13/- How do we get updates on the project?

We will continue to announce information on the progress of the project through the public

media such as billboards, radio, television, information brochure resettlement, Grievance

Redress Mechanism... Project documents will be posted at your village/commune office. For

more information, you can also reach us through:

Southeast Asia Department via Vietnam Resident Mission Office in Hanoi

Address: 3rd Floor, No.16, Phan Chu Trinh Street, Hoan Kiem District, Ha Noi

Tel: 02439.331.374

The affected household may access ADB’s Accountability Mechanism: https://www.adb.org/site/accountability-mechanism/main.

Thăng Long Project managemen Unit – MOT

Address: Group 23, Lĩnh Nam ward, Hoàng Mai District, Hà Nội

Tel: 02436.430.212 Email: [email protected]

Permanent agency of three District Resettlement Committee

Department of Natural Resources and

Environment, Ha Trung District Tel: 02373.836.130


Environment Bá Thước District Tel: 02376.561.014


Environment Cam Thuy District Tel: 02373.876.094

mailto:[email protected]

the second northern greater mekong sub-region transport

Documents