A dynamic new deanshares her vision forimproving legal education

FUSION CENTERS: WHERE PRIVACYAND TECHNOLOGY COLLIDE

FINANCIAL MELTDOWN POST-MORTEM

UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF LAW MAGAZINE 2009

Ready forTakeoff

UN

IVE

RSIT

YO

FM

AR

YLA

ND

SCH

OO

LO

FLA

WM

AG

AZ

INE

20

09

16 WHO WILLWATCH THE WATCHERS?Securing Constitutional Rights in the Security State

BY MIKE FIELDILLUSTRATION BY MARTIN O’NEILL

12 22 28LISTENING WELL

The School of Law’s new dean, anational leader in legal education,is known for engaging the thoughtsof others, then acting decisively tomove things forward.

BY JAMIE SMITH

ANATOMY OF A MELTDOWN

Figuring out what led to today’seconomic mess could hold thebest clues for moving forward –and averting the world’s nextfinancial crisis.

BY PATRICK A. MCGUIRE

BELLUS OSSIFRAGI LIB

Civil Rights in the Cyber World

BY DANIELLE CITRON

Reflections on the Financial Crisisand Investment Banking

BY ROBERT J. RHEE

ILLUSTRATION BY KEVIN MCSHERRY

feat

ures

Perpetual Motion

“I OFTEN FIND MYSELF RUSHING through the vestibule of the law school from work to a class or from anexternship. Although most law students usually walk calmly, quietly, and composed through the class-room door once they arrive at class, it is a bit chaotic before. When I am standing at the guard’s desk, Ihave noticed other law students rushing to and from, and as a result, I happened to catch this photo.

I joke with my classmates that it feels like we will always be rushing or that we are in a perpetualintellectual whirlwind (especially when you take summer classes). Once law school is over, life reallydoes not slow down and might speed up even more. One thing that I have noticed is that UM Lawgives us confidence to explore and conquer new projects or endeavors as law students. As a result,many of us graduate and enter the legal world with refined passions or specialities that make usunique commodities. Thus, I suppose there is no time to slow down but capturing this student ‘in-motion’ makes me think that maybe there is just enough time to stop and appreciate all that the lawschool has taught us.”

Daria Grayer is a second-year evening student, bioethicist at Washington Hospital Center’sCenter for Ethics, and an award-winning photographer.

Dear Graduates and Friends,I have known for many years that Maryland is a great law

school. As a law professor at Temple University, I respectedso many of UM Law’s faculty and greatly admired the School’scommitment to public service and its groundbreakingClinical Law Program. During the Dean Search process, themore I learned about the Law School, the more impressed Ibecame. But not until I became a member of the communitymyself did I fully appreciate how remarkable MarylandLaw truly is.

It’s a community that includes the gifted teachers andscholars and committed staff who work here. Outstandingstudents who study inside these walls. Dedicated graduateswho devote countless hours of their time and offer wisecounsel. And generous supporters who provide vital resourcesto sustain our work.

Most meaningfully, this institution’s definition of com-munity doesn’t end at the doors of the Law School, or exclude individuals that have never set foot in ourbuilding. Our community includes our neighbors in Baltimore who are given a voice and find justicethanks to the efforts of our legal clinics. It extends to disaster-stricken regions where our graduates helprebuild shattered lives. It reaches Capitol Hill, as our faculty’s scholarly expertise shapes the debate oncutting-edge issues at the intersection of technology and privacy. I invite you to read about all theseaspects of our community, and many more, in the pages that follow.

I also to thank so many of you for all you have done to welcome me to your community. I have appreciatedlearning more about you and your thoughts about the Law School’s future. This issue of the magazineprovides an opportunity for you to learn more about me. Another opportunity for us to meet will beOctober 3, as the School of Law hosts my first formal event as Dean. I hope you will be able to attend andlook forward to meeting as many of you as possible.

My door is always open, and I will be relying on your insight and support as we continue to expand thereach and impact of the Maryland Law community.

Best wishes,

Phoebe A. HaddonDean

JD 20093

| DEAN’S MESSAGE |

3 DEAN’SMESSAGE

4 UMLAW CITES

6 COMMUNITYFaculty and Student Activities

36 FACULTYRetirements

Professor of Law Roger WolfAssistant Dean Jim Forsyth

Promotions and Appointments

Publications, Presentationsand Honors

44 STUDENTSEvents

Pessimus perspicax zothecas cir-cumgrediet Pompeii. Chirographisuffragarit umbracu

46 ALUMNI

Joseph Hardiman ’62Juliet Choi ’03

Events

Octavius infeliciter praemunietrures. Medusa neg

52 MAKING AN IMPACTCAMPAIGN

71 BOARD OF VISITORS

depa

rtm

ents

PUBLISHERTeresa LaMaster (’95)Associate Dean forInstitutional Advancement

EDITORIAL DIRECTORJames R. SmithDirector of Communications

EDITOR IN CHIEFSue DePasquale

ART DIRECTORKimberley Jackson

CONTRIBUTING WRITERSDanielle CitronMike FieldChristine GrilloToby Treem GuerinElizabeth HeubeckPatrick McGuireBryan PughJeff RaymondRobert RheeGynene SullivanMartha Thomas

CONTRIBUTINGPHOTOGRAPHERSNick AlexopolousKirsten BeckermanRobert BurkeLarry CannerEd HaddonSteve SpartanaBob StockfieldScott SuchmanGynene Sullivan

PROOFREADERLu Ann Marshall

EDITORIAL AND DESIGNPROVIDED BYAlter CommunicationsCustom Publishing Group1040 Park Avenue, Suite 200Baltimore, MD 21201443-451-0738

JD is published by the Universityof Maryland School of Lawwww.law.umaryland.edu

Office of Institutional Advancement500 W. Baltimore StreetBaltimore, MD 21201-1786

© 2009 by the University ofMaryland Baltimore

2009UNIVERSITY OF MARYLANDSCHOOL OF LAW MAGAZINE

45

49

9

JD 20095JD 2009 4

from Faculty on Legal Issues of the Day

| UMLAW CITES |

Wit and Wisdom “No one has done a decent job of coveringthe four years that Thurgood Marshall practiced in

Baltimore. It was a very active period, but it wasdifficult to get at. He did major civil rights cases, but

he also tried to keep his private practice.”

—Larry Gibson in the Washington Post, announcing the opening of the newexhibit “Thurgood Marshall’s Early Career in Maryland: 1933-1937” in the

Marshall Law Library.

“In the last couple of yearspeople are starting to be awarethat if they have these units intheir car, people can keep track

of you. I think it’s a growingpublic awareness. The problem is

that most people feel like, ‘I’mnot doing anything wrong, so

who cares?’ But I think that’s thewrong way of looking at it.”

—Renée Hutchins in a New York Times article aboutFourth Amendment protections for the use of GPS data.

“The AIG bailout is a wealthtransfer scheme in the guise of a public invest-

ment in a supposedly going concern. In plainEnglish,AIG is winding up its derivative business.Since it was on the losing side of derivatives bets,

wind up means payment to winners.”

—Robert Rhee in a National Law Journal op-ed about the AIG bailout.

“The longer anaccused remains

unrepresented and unableto challenge the

government’s case, themore likely delay

jeopardizes a fair trial.The prosecutor’s decisive

advantage often results inunjust convictions and

coerced pleas.”

—Douglas Colbert, writing in The NationalLaw Journal about equal justice for poor peo-

ple accused of committing a crime.

“It’s amazing what we willdo and say when we are shielded

from social shaming. You thinkwhen you’re doing it online, people

are images and things that weattack. It’s depersonalized. Thisgeneration has been schooled in

the misogyny of bravado. It’sbecome a point of pride that Ican talk that way, too. I can be

vicious. Young women are jumpingon this, thinking it’s empowering.

It’s anything but.”

—Danielle Citron, in the Philadelphia Inquirer,speaking about online bullying.

“It’s been nearly two decades since anyonewho has not served as a federal appellate judge –for at least a little while—has been confirmed to sit onthe Supreme Court.What this means is that justices onthe Court have come to be representative of a verynarrow slice of the profession. Federal appellate judges,former federal prosecutors and high-powered federalappellate practitioners stand a very good chance ofgetting nominated. State court judges, full-time lawprofessors, former criminal defense attorneys, even civilpractice trial lawyers—not so much.”

—Sherrilyn Ifill in a CNN commentary about the need for professional diversityon the Supreme Court. “I have applauded the Governor for his

vision in continuing to invest in the future ofbiotechnology in our state. There are numerouslegal and ethical considerations in this type ofresearch. But the world’s most prominent scientists,researchers, and policy makers in the fieldrecognize that Maryland has developed an approachto stem-cell research that serves as a model for therest of the world.”

—Karen Rothenberg, Chair of the Maryland Stem Cell Commission, in theWashington Post after Governor Martin O’Malley reconfirmed his commitmentto funding stem cell research.

“During the Bush years,it was all too common for

administration political

appointees to suppress or

reshape scientific findings. They

infamously tried to suppress a

report by EPA scientists on the

scope of global warming, for

example. But ending such

heavy-handed manipulation by

political appointees is the low-

hanging fruit of the effort to

restore science to its rightful

role in policymaking. It

absolutely needs to be picked,

but there’s much more to

harvest.”

—Rena Steinzor in a Baltimore Sun op-ed about therelationship between science and policy.

“Did China and Indiasuddenly have gigantic needsfor new oil products in a singleday? No. Everybody agreessupply-demand could not drivethe price up $25, which was arecord increase in the price ofoil. The price of oil went fromsomewhere in the 60s to $147in less than a year. And we werebeing told during that run-up,it’s supply-demand, supply-demand, supply-demand.”

—Michael Greenberger on 60 Minutes, discussing therole of speculation in driving up oil prices, including aone-day jump of $25.

JD 2009 6

IN 2002, DAVID PASSON, A DISABLED VIETNAM

veteran living on a fixed income, found himself in adesperate situation. Confronting a mound of medicalbills, he sold some stocks to pay down his debt. Butin fending off one set of creditors, he unsuspectinglystumbled into a different quagmire.

Six years later, Passon received a $30,000 billfrom the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), whichhad taxed the earnings of the stocks he had sold.Fortunately, Passon immediately notified his socialworker, who referred him to UMLaw’s Low IncomeTaxpayer Clinic.

Enter law student Jonathan Elefant, J.D. candidate2010. Researching the matter, he determined that thestocks Passon sold had not appreciated enough towarrant the taxes imposed by the IRS. Over the courseof nearly three months, Elefant assisted Passon inpreparing a new tax return, essentially wiping hisfinancial slate clean.

“I’m so very grateful. Jonathan was marvelous,”says Passon, who, prior to going to the clinic, facednot only an insurmountable debt but the IRS’sthreat to garnish his Social Security wages.

The resolution didn’t come easily. “Once the IRSassesses a tax liability, you have to unravel the wholeprocess. We simultaneously negotiate with the IRS toget them to stop collecting against the client whileworking to determine whether the tax liability isvalid,” explains visiting law school assistant professorPamela Chaney, who oversees the clinic.

Under Chaney’s guidance, student attorneysprovide free tax preparation to low- and moderate-income working families in Baltimore City andrepresent low-income Maryland residents who havedisputes with the IRS. This academic year, theclinic prepared an estimated 175 tax returns andassisted 64 clients in resolving tax issues. Students areexpected to average 28 hours of clinic work perweek, but Elefant took on an additional caseload.

“I stayed late, I worked Sundays,” he says.“Being low-income doesn’t entitle people to any lessrespect or any less dignity than we would give ourfriends and families. The fact that they’re here showsus they’re not trying to run away from the issues;they’re trying to resolve them.”

By Elizabeth Heubeck

SettingThingsStraight withUncle Sam

Clinical Law Program Fills Vital NeedsEACH YEAR, THE STUDENT ATTORNEYS who take part in UMLaw’s 26 student law

clinics provide free legal services to hundreds of community residents in need, while

honing their own legal skills. Brenda Bratton Blom, professor and director of the

School of Law’s Clinical Law Program, estimates the clinics provide an average of

110,000 hours of service annually—involving 25 faculty and 250 students. “The

number of people who need these services grows every year. When you have to

choose between lunch and a lawyer, it’s an easy decision,” Blom says. Accomplish-

ments of Clinic faculty and students in 2008-09 included:

Students in the Reparations, Reconciliation and Restorative Justice seminar

spearheaded passage of a new state law that requires insurance companies wishing

to do business in Maryland to disclose any policies they or their predecessor firms

provided to slave owners until 1865;

The Civil Rights of Persons With Disabilities Clinic was instrumental in the

case of Shane Feldman, et al., v. Pro Football Inc., et al.,which determined that under

the Americans With Disabilities Act, closed captioning of scoreboard announcements

during Washington Redskins games at FedEx Field was not optional but required;

The Environmental Law Clinic recorded a number of victories. Students re-

searched and drafted the newly enacted Environmental Standing Bill that gives indi-

viduals and associations the ability to challenge state environmental permits,

licenses, and Critical Areas variances and other state environmental decisions in

state court.

The Waterkeeper Alliance, represented by the Clinic, reached an agreement with

the Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE) resolving the Waterkeepers’

legal challenge to MDE’s general stormwater permit for construction sites. As a re-

sult of this agreement, MDE has committed to making significant changes to the way

it requires developers to prevent polluted runoff caused when rain washes sedi-

ment and other pollutants from these exposed areas.

The Drug Policy and Public Health Strategies Clinic worked with the U.S.

Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division in negotiations with Baltimore to remedy

the City’s zoning code’s discrimination against licensed residential substance abuse

treatment facilities

Working in the Low Income Taxpayer Clinic, Jonathan Elefant ’10 helped a clientresolve a $30,000 bill from the IRS.

FROM THE OUTSET, THE NEW COURSE Lawyers andLegal Systems and Their Social Context, was an unusualventure. Funded in part by a grant from the Fetzer Instituteof Kalamazoo, Michigan, the course asked School of Lawstudents to critically examine common assumptionsabout the legal system, including its fundamental moraland ethical premises.

“We decided it would make sense to present some-thing to the public. We wanted to show the kinds of legaland ethical issues lawyers face,” says professor MichaelMillemann, who co-taught the class with Robert Bowie’77, founder of Bowie & Jensen, LLC, and a part-timeplaywright. Live theater—an art form defined by themaxim “show, don’t tell”—proved uniquely well suited tothis process, so the duo set out to have their student cre-ate an original drama.

Millemann, Bowie, and their students decided to focuson the case of Walter Arvinger, whose case made nationalnews in 2004 when he was released after 36 years behindbars for a murder it is now widely accepted he did notcommit. Millemann and students from the School of Lawwere instrumental in bringing attention to the case andsecuring his release. The play that resulted is actually aplay-within-a-play, showing both the events leading tothe false conviction, and the moral and ethical issuesstudents grappled with three decades later as they triedto prove Arvinger’s innocence.

The professors initially had expected to cast the showusing local actors. “What really surprised me was how

completely the students took control of the effort,” saysBowie. “They wanted to act in the roles they created, whichwas incredible; it really was an added benefit to the class.”

The students were not without resources. Professionaltheatrical leadership was provided by Elliott Rauh, man-aging director of Baltimore’s Single Carrot Theatre, whoserved as director. of the production. His cast of fourmen and four women “entered into the heart of the law,”says Bowie, “by engaging in a process that exposed themto the humanity of law that is usually only learned afterthe boot camp experience of law school is completed.”

The process of researching, writing, discussing, andrehearsing the play—which included classroom visits byArvinger himself, and from former Governor RobertEhrlich, who commuted Arvinger’s sentence—brought areal immediacy to the idea that lawyers’ actions have far-reaching consequences. “I really had to think about whatthe lawyers did, and that made a big impression uponme,” says graduating student Octavia Shulman, who playedArvinger’s mother, and the “class clown” in the studentscenes. “Everyone was so excited by this. It was so uncon-ventional teaching the law in such a creative way. Whenthe Governor came to school that conversation reallyscared me to death. What I do or don’t do as a lawyer canhugely impact someone’s life. It made me feel I reallyhave to know my stuff.”

For director Elliot Rauh, the whole effort really cametogether when the play was performed in April before astanding room only house of friends, classmates, faculty,and family members of the cast. “There is a momentwhen the students transform to prisoners in a jail, callingout at Kaplan [Arvinger’s attorney]. It was this reallywonderful theatrical moment. Basically in four weeks ofrehearsal we bonded and had this opportunity to createsomething together, and it really worked.”

JD 20097

By Mike Field

on StageandOff

Students rehearse the play about Walter Arvinger’slife sentence and its commutation that they wrote inthe course “Lawyers and Legal Systems and TheirSocial Context.”

Grappling with Ethical Issues—

| COMMUNITY | Faculty and Student Activities

JD 20099JD 2009 8

THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION of HumanRights (UDHR) remains an important,guiding model for governments and peoplearound the world, but 60 years after itsadoption by the United Nations, constantpolitical will and effort is still required to seethe document’s high-minded promises turninto real protections.

That message was among those aired at theSchool of Law’s three-day symposium fromOct. 23- 25 marking the 60th anniversary ofthe declaration’s signing. Speakers addressedthe challenges posed to the ideals contained inthe document by worldwide poverty, hunger,poor health, and persecution. The litany ofhuman rights abuses by autocratic regimesfrom Chile to Russia and China are beingreplaced or joined by abuses cloaked in thebanner of counterterrorism, according toseveral of the more than three dozen speakersand moderators.

Former President of Ireland and U.N.High Commissioner for Human Rights MaryRobinson delivered the keynote. “Sixty yearson, there is a woeful global failure to secureaccess to justice and basic rights like food,health, and safety for a majority of humans.The law doesn’t work for about 4 billionpeople in our world,” said Robinson.

Human Rights Progress, Abuse TakeCenter Stage atBy Jeff Raymond

Redefining theRole of ClinicalEducation

TO COMMEMORATE the 35th

anniversary of its founding, the

School of Law’s pioneering Clini-

cal Law Program spotlighted its

mission of integrating theory

with practice by hosting the

national conference “Curriculum

Reform: Linking Theory and

Practice” on March 6.

Faculty and deans from lead-

ing clinical law institutions

gathered for discussions about

integrating best practices into

the curriculum and the redevel-

opment of law school curricula.

“Clinical legal educators are

poised to play an important role

in the next developments in the

legal academy,” said Brenda

Bratton Blom, Director of the

Clinical Law Program. “This is

not a time to just plow ahead as

if circumstances were the same

as they were last week or last

year. This is a time to take a

deep breath, and evaluate not

just how we are preparing stu-

dents to be lawyers, but how we

are maximizing our impact in

the services that we deliver.”

In his keynote address,

Professor Michael Millemann

detailed the different ways the

Clinical Law Program at the

School of Law has grown and

changed over 35 years. But the

overarching concern, he said,

is to continue to teach and

mentor students, even as

alumni. “We all are special

trustees of the students’ ideal-

ism,” he said. “We recruit stu-

dents because they are

idealistic. When they get here,

we should nurture that ideal-

ism. When they graduate, we

have to continue to support it.”

—GyneneSullivan

IN THE LATE 1960S AND ’70S, POLICY MAKERS endorsed a “reformist approach” toward

addiction that emphasized the need to provide treatment therapeutically instead of criminally.

However, exploding drug use in the ’70s alarmed policy makers and led to the initiation of the

“War on Drugs” and a zero-tolerance approach to addiction treatment.

Last November 7, the Law & Health Care Program co-hosted the conference “Obstacles

to the Development and Use of Pharmacotherapies for Addiction.” In delivering this year’s

Stuart Rome Lecture, Professor Richard Bonnie, an expert in the fields of mental health and

drug law, asserted that the pendulum is swinging back to therapeutic treatment because “it

has become increasingly clear that the War on Drugs has caused a great deal of damage at

great cost, with little evidence that it has made any impact.”

At the conference, lawyers, health care providers, judges, and regulators discussed the

obstacles that exist at each stage of medication development and uptake, including challenges

for pharmaceutical companies; obstacles relating to clinical trials and the FDA approval process;

patient reluctance to use and provider reluctance to screen for, and prescribe, medications to

treat addiction; and gaps in insurance coverage for these medications.

Videos of the panel discussions are available at http://www.law.umaryland.edu/pharma.

By Gynene Sullivan

Drug Policy PendulumSwinging Back

Justice Chaskalson (right) and Former President of Ireland andU.N High Commissioner for Human Rights Mary Robinson.

UDHR 60th Anniversary

(l to r): Dr. David Lewis, Brown University, Professor Richard,Bonnie, University of Virginia and School of Law AssociateDean and L&HCP Director Diane Hoffmann.

The annual Business Law Conference, “The SubprimeMeltdown: Causes, Consequences and Solutions” couldn’t have beenmore timely. On Oct. 3, 2008, as experts from academia, the financialservices sector, consumer groups, Capitol Hill, journalism, and regulatoryinstitutions gathered at the Law School to discuss the nation’s economiccrisis, Congress passed a $700 billion bailout. Participants’ skepticismabout the plan proved prescient. “A lot of this legislation is highly illusory,”said Michael Greenberger, a professor at the School of Law and directorof its Center for Health and Homeland Security, a panelist and moderator

of the symposium. “Congress does not have an infra-structure in place to deal with this.” (l-r) New York

Times Editorial Board Member Teresa Tritch,Damon A. Silvers, Associate General Counsel

for the AFL/CIO, Thomas E. Pérez, Secretary ofthe Maryland Dept. of Labor, Licensing, andRegulation, and School of Law Dean KarenH. Rothenberg led a lunchtime discussion ofthe meltdown’s impact on the country.

| COMMUNITY | Faculty and Student Activities

DISTINGUISHED VISITING PROFESSOR Justice Bess Nkabinde, aJustice on the Constitutional Court of South Africa, delivered thelecture “The Modern Constitution of South Africa: Are the Promises inthe Constitution Realizable or a Distant Dream?” last October 20.

“The promises are not a dream. South Africans retain their faithin the resilience of their Constitution and the vibrancy of theirdemocracy. Never again will we be subject to the oppression of thepast,” said Justice Nkabinde, noting that after the Constitution wasadopted, seven million copies in the 11 official languages of SouthAfrica were distributed throughout the country.

Justice Nkabinde was one of several Distinguished Visitors whospent time on campus during the 2008-09 academic year through aprogram that invites distinguished legal practitioners and academics—from both legal and non-legal disciplines—to join the School of Lawcommunity. Other visitors were Martha Bergmark, president and chiefexecutive officer of the Mississippi Center for Justice, and Mary L.Dudziak, the Judge Edward J. and Ruey L. Guirado Professor ofLaw, History, and Political Science at USC Gould School of Law

“We must never stop learning from each other. The beauty ofthe legal profession is that you always have colleagues to confer with.The knowledge I’ve gained from collaborating with my new colleaguesat Maryland will help the Constitutional Court of South Africa,”said Justice Nkabinde.

Striving forConstitutional

in South AfricaRights

By Jamie Smith

Leading the Way in AlternativeDispute Resolution

FOR THE SECOND CONSECUTIVE YEAR, Maryland leaders

participated in the Maryland Public Policy Conflict Resolution

Fellows Program. Building upon the success of the inaugural

program in 2007, the Fellows engaged in three days of ex-

ploration of interest-based negotiation, collaborative gover-

nance, and consensus building skills. The second class of

Fellows represented a wide variety of Maryland leaders in-

cluding representatives from the legislature, faith-based

community, judiciary, executive, and non-profit sectors who

came together to learn from each other and national leaders

in the field of public policy dispute resolution.

The Fellows were invited by the program sponsors, the

Honorable Robert M. Bell, Chief Judge of the Maryland Court

of Appeals; David J. Ramsay, President of the University of

Maryland, Baltimore; and Dean Karen H. Rothenberg.

“As a problem-solving institution, the Judiciary has an

interest in advancing collaborative leadership in Maryland,”

said the Hon. Benjamin Clyburn, a 2008 Fellow. “I thoroughly

enjoyed participating in the Fellows program and used the

opportunity to sharpen my own negotiation and collabora-

tion skills with a wonderful group of people.”

—TobyTreemGuerin

Distinguished Visiting Professor Justice Bess Nkabinde delivered the lecture“The Modern Constitution of South Africa: Are the Promises in the Constitution

Realizable or a Distant Dream?”

8

Lynne Battaglia ’74 describes it as a “conundrum” that dictatescareer choices for female lawyers: When law firms base evaluationson billable hours rather than on quality of work, women can

sometimes be at a disadvantage, says the Maryland Court of Appeals Judge.Wendy Butler Curtis ’98, a special counsel in litigation at Orrick’s

Washington office, wonders why women, who “were disproportionatelyahead in the class” at law school, later comprise just 20 percent ofpartners in law firms.

Both issues were discussed at a roundtable that Battaglia and Curtisattended in December at the Law School. The discussion was an out-growth of a career satisfaction study, undertaken by professors JanaSinger and PaulaMonopoli and sup-ported by the LawSchool’s Office of In-stitutional Advance-ment and CareerDevelopment Office.The professors surveyed UMLaw graduates going back to the Classof 1977. The ultimate aim for their work: to chart a plan of action forimproving women’s experiences in the legal profession.

Singer and Monopoli queried more than 600 alumni in their Fall2008 survey. “We were interested in alums in general, but we wantedto know if the experiences of women in the workplace were different,and if they were making different choices in their careers,” saysMonopoli, founding director of the Women, Leadership & Equality(WLE) program, which oversaw the project. The questions aimedto reveal differences in career choices, and overall satisfaction withlife and work.

The most gratifying finding, Monopoli says, “is that our graduates—both men and women—are generally happy.” But the survey showedthat there are still great disparities in career advancement among menand women, and also in their priorities. The women surveyed, for

example, were significantly more likelythan men to identify flexibility in theworkplace, and work-family balance,as important to their career satisfaction.

One outcome of the study, saysSinger, may be better guidance foremployers when it comes to retention.

This is an important issue for law firms, which incur high costs re-placing employees who leave. Toward that end, the professors sharedpreliminary findings in a workshop last April for area law firms thatare committed to better retaining and advancing female lawyers.“We [aimed] to offer suggestions about what will make lawyerswant to stay,” Singer says, such as offering opportunities for flexibleschedules, without stigmatizing that choice. Compensation is alsoan important issue, says Monopoli. “Men measure success by theamount of compensation they receive. Women are less likely to saycompensation is most important to them, but they did say they wereconcerned with being appropriately compensated. There’s a feelingout there that women don’t feel they are getting what they deserve.That to me is an important finding”—for employers, she says.

Wendy Curtis says the research “is a call to action. It captures therealities that we all experience, but it’s nice to see it in writing. Thatway, we can go back to our own workplaces and institute change.”

Monopoli and Singer will present their final report this fall.

—Martha Thomas

JD 200911JD 2009 10

For Bill Ferguson, a second-year law student committed to improvingpublic education, the inauguration of Barack Obama last winterseemed the perfect setting for proposing marriage to his girlfriend,

Lea Smith. After all, the two had met when they were both teaching inBaltimore as part of the Teach for America program. They’d deepenedtheir commitment to the community—and to each other—by volunteeringfor the Obama campaign, spending election day on a flatbed truck inPhiladelphia, assisting and entertaining voters.

So when Ferguson heard about an essay contest sponsored bythe Presidential Inaugural Committee, which offered “Tickets toHistory” for 10 supporters who could explain what the inauguration ofBarack Obama meant to them, he jumped at the chance to enter. “Iwrote about why we work in education, how the inauguration symbol-ized such an important shift in the United States,” Ferguson says. Healso promised to pop the question at the inauguration.

That did the trick. Three days before the big event, Ferguson learnedthat he and Smith were invited to attend the inauguration, and many ofthe surrounding VIP events. The couple’s magical moment came justafter Obama finished his inaugural address, when Ferguson droppedto one knee and made his proposal. Through tears, Smith said yes.

As spring slipped in to summer, and the couple’s August 15 weddingdate fast approached, Ferguson balanced his wedding preparationplans with his law school studies and his work as a graduate intern forBaltimore City Schools CEO Andres Alonso. In that role, which he’sheld for two years, Ferguson has worked directly with Alonso in reorgan-izing the central office as funding is decentralized.

“What we’re doing is high level policy reform,” Ferguson explains.“During my first year, the focus was on ‘fair student funding’—shiftingmoney from the central office to the schools, so that they can makedecisions about how to spend it.” In year two, he says, efforts broadenedto include restructuring—including layoffs—of the central office.

Fiancee Smith has worked just down the hall, as special assistant toAlonso’s chief of staff Tisha Edwards ’01. Ferguson says he’s been inspiredin his work because both Alonso and Edwards are lawyers. “I think Iconnect with them,” he says. “There’s a way that law school teachesyou to think, to approach things from every angle, to attack a policyfrom each stakeholder’s viewpoint.”

For Ferguson, who was also selected this spring to the prestigiousMaryland Law Review, the work with CEO Alonso wasn’t the onlything that kept him busy. Just days after returning from the Inaugura-tion, he and Smith learned of a proposed state budget cut to cityschools. “We decided to do something about trying to restore thebudget for our kids in Baltimore City and we saw our opportunityto deliver our own message of hope and our ability to contribute,”he says. The couple launched “Maryland Ed Equity,” and ultimatelyhand carried 75 letters, signed by TFA teachers, to Annapolis to presentto the Governor.

“Without my experiences with TFA, the law school, the electionof President Obama, proposing to Lea, and our experiences at the in-auguration, we would never have had the courage or insight to start‘Maryland Ed Equity,’” says Ferguson. “My take away message from allof these wonderful events is that you can’t just wait for change tohappen, you have to make change happen.”

—Martha Thomas, with Bryan Pugh

Joined inCommitment

toPublic

“What we’re doingis high level policy

reform.” –Bill Ferguson

ServiceThe election of Barack Obamahad an inspiring impact on third-year student Bill Ferguson.

| COMMUNITY | Faculty and Student Activities

SOME KEY FINDINGS

• Although men and women are equally likely to begin theircareers at law firms, they are not equally likely to stay there:

• 47% of women began careers at private firms; 29% remain

• 50% of men began careers at private firms; 40% remain

• 40% of women are employed by government

• 25% of men are employed by government

Panelists for the April 24 discussion “Strategies That Work: In-novation and Experience from the Field” were (l-r): Laura L. John-son of Gordon, Feinblatt, Rothman, Hoffberger & Hollander; HeidiHansan of Miles & Stockbridge; Valerie Granfield Roush ofSodexo, Inc.; and Karen Popp of Sidley Austin.

Career Survey Sparks“Call to Action”

“WOMEN DON’T FEEL they are getting (paid)what they deserve.”

—Prof. Paula Monopoli

FROM YOUR FIRST CONVERSATION withPhoebe Haddon, it’s quickly apparent whyshe is universally described as a great listenerby colleagues, friends, and family alike. Hersmile is broad and luminous, her laughteruninhibited and contagious. She leans slightlyforward across the tabletop, maintains asteady contact with her warm, dark eyes, andnods, gently encouraging you to go on. Andan interview intended to provide the Univer-sity of Maryland School of Law’s new Deanwith an opportunity to hold forth about her-self – at length and without interruption –quickly becomes a conversation in which shelistens almost as much as she speaks.

“To listen well is as powerful a means ofcommunication and influence as to talkwell,” said John Marshall. Dean Haddon’srecord of leadership and the broad respectshe enjoys throughout the legal professionbear out the words of the U.S. SupremeCourt’s first Chief Justice.

Revealingly, the people she’s most inter-ested in hearing from are those who disagreewith her.

“I’m always going to listen to what yousay. I’m not afraid to engage the thoughts of

others. They may be helpful in fixing what I’mdoing wrong,” Dean Haddon says, reflectingtwo other aspects of her personality repeatedlyidentified by those who know her best: self-confidence and respect for the views of others.

Over the last three decades, she has em-ployed these strengths to improve institutionsranging from the American Bar Association’sCouncil of Legal Education and Admission tothe Bar, to the Redevelopment Authority ofthe City of Philadelphia, to the American LawInstitute-ABA Committee on ContinuingProfessional Education.

“Dean Haddon has been recognized as anational leader for years,” says former deanof the University of North Carolina Schoolof Law Judith Wegner, who co-authoredthe Carnegie Foundation for the Advance-ment of Teaching’s 2007 landmark report,Educating Lawyers: Preparation for the Profes-sion of Law. “Maryland Law’s uniquestrengths provide a perfect opportunity forPhoebe to employ her experience and visionfor improving legal education in a way thatwill position the School even more promi-nently within the legal profession and thelegal academy.”

JD 200913JD 2009 12

Sounds of

By Jamie Smith

ProgressThe School of Law’s new dean, a

national leader in legal education,

is known for engaging the

thoughts of others, then acting

decisively to move things forward.

Colleagues cite Dean Haddon’s facility forbringing together an organization’s diverse,sometimes antagonistic constituencies, andgetting them talking. She listens, finds thecommon ground, and builds a coalition ofsupporters. Then she leads them in developingand implementing an approach that results inthe achievement of a shared goal.

“Phoebe has a personal and professionalphilosophy that you can get more thingsaccomplished with cooperation instead ofcompetition,” says I. Herman Stern ProfessorEmeritus of Law Frank McClellan, who hasbeen Haddon’s colleague on the TempleLaw faculty since 1981, and her husbandsince 1985.

“It’s an interesting approach for a lawyer toget people out of the adversarial approach andinto a cooperative one where you’re lookingfor similarities in what you believe, not differ-ences. She doesn’t see competition as thedominant model, and she’s not looking to winif it means someone else has to lose.”

But Dean Haddon’s emphasis on collabora-tion shouldn’t be confused with a lack ofmettle, say those who know her well. Herscholarly expertise includes such famouslycontentious areas as torts litigation, and thejury. And when emphasizing a strongly-heldbelief, she’ll remove her brown plastic-rimmedglasses and fix you with a look that leaves nodoubt: Dean Haddon is a leader.

“Phoebe has a philosophy that participa-tion and collaboration are key to the delibera-tive process. But what she’s really good at ismaking things happen after the deliberationsare over,” says Joanne Epps, Dean of TempleUniversity’s Beasley School of Law and afaculty colleague of Haddon’s for more than20 years. “Some people have great ideas, butcan’t go from the idea to its execution. Phoebeis committed not only to arriving at a greatidea but also ensuring that it is acted upon.”

A strategic thinker who is deeply engagedin developments in higher education and thelegal profession, Dean Haddon is in the begin-ning stages of organizing a strategic plan forthe School of Law. Characteristically, thisplanning process has begun by listening. Shehas conducted a retreat with her deans, hasbegun to meet with members of the Board ofVisitors, and – after hosting a breakfast for allLaw School faculty and staff on the morningof her first day at Maryland – is now in theprocess of holding one-on-one interviews withevery member of the faculty and law schooladministrators. And while Dean Haddon’splan for the Law School ultimately will reflectthe shared views of a wide range of con-stituents, it will no doubt be shaped by herown vision for the future of legal education.

When the Carnegie Report was publishedin 2007, its challenge to law schools to focusmore on developing students’ ethical skillsand commitment to justice was highly influen-tial and groundbreaking. Dean Haddon hadissued a similar call almost 15 years earlier.

In “Education for a Public Calling in theTwenty-First Century,” 69Washington LawReview 573 (1994) she wrote that law schools“have an opportunity to define good lawyering… as a public calling which emphasizes aprofessional obligation to promote equalityin the legal system … to clarify the valuesimportant to the practice of law in contem-plation of a more pro-active public role.”

Today, she believes more firmly than everthat lawyers’ moral obligations to advancejustice extend far beyond their responsibilitiesas client advocates and officers of the court.

“That doesn’t describe what I believe tobe the richness of lawyers’ societal obliga-tions, which can be very broadly and richlydefined, and clearly includes something morethan simply following the rules of the court,”she says.

In her article 15 years ago, Haddon citedMaryland Law as one of the few institutionsthat was addressing those issues. Today, DeanHaddon says the School is positioned to bea leader in reshaping not only legal educa-tion, but perhaps the legal profession itself.Location, prominence in clinical education,engagement in public service, and an out-standing faculty—committed to excellencein teaching and dedicated to scholarship thatsearches for solutions to real world problems—all play a part.

“Our location provides a tremendousopportunity to be part of not only a metro-politan statewide conversation, but of a na-tional and global conversation,” she says.“We can help define what justice is, andsolve problems in ways that recognize thecomplexity of today’s society. And we canbe leaders in thinking creatively about theroles of teachers and scholars, of students,and the legal profession in today’s world.”

A fourth-generation lawyer and educator,Dean Haddon says it was clear from child-hood that she would either study law orbecome an educator, but in her family, shesays, “I was the first one who did both.”Her father Wallace James Haddon, a dentist,moved the family in 1955 from Hampton,VA, to Passaic, NJ, after identifying it as acity where an African American could estab-lish a substantial professional practice.Haddon’s mother began her career as a math-ematician at the National Advisory Committeefor Aeronautics (NASA’s precursor), thenbecame a junior high school math teacherand high school guidance counselor whenthe family moved to New Jersey.

Throughout Haddon’s middle class child-hood, belief in the importance of educationwas a core value of her family. So, too, were acommitment to excellence and the determi-

nation to overcome any obstacles that mightdeter that pursuit. Dean Haddon points inparticular to her grandmother, Phoebe Bassette,as someone from whom she inherited morethan her name. Once, Bassette – notoriouslylate and frequently trying to juggle 20 thingsat once – was pulled over for speeding downthe street in her hometown of Hampton. Itwas the 1940s, and undaunted by either hisbadge or his race, she told the white policeofficer of this small southern town, “I’m sorry,but I have some place to go. If you need to talkto someone, my husband’s office is right downthe street,” and kept on going.

“I do that sometimes, too. I get so involvedin what I’m doing that the fact that theremight be some barriers or things that are inthe way don’t even occur to me as stoppingprogress,” says Haddon.

While in high school, Haddon took amonth-long trip to France with a studentgroup, engendering a lifelong love of travelthat has taken her to every continent except

Antarctica and Australia. At Smith College,she earned a degree in government, withminors in economics and African Americanstudies. The experience was so important toher, that she remained deeply involved inthe life of the College, serving on the Boardof Trustees for a decade, including a term asVice Chair.

After moving to Pittsburgh in the early1970s, Haddon applied to several nearby lawschools. One school offered her admission,as well as scholarship support through anaffirmative action program that stipulated its

JD 200915JD 2009 14

“SOME PEOPLE HAVE great ideas, but can’t go

from the idea to its execution. Phoebe is

committed not only to arriving at a great idea but

also ensuring that it is acted upon.”

grandparents, Name and Name

—Joanne Epps, Dean of Temple University’s Beasley School of Law

as Duquesne Law Review editor in 1976, with theschool’s Dean, Ronald Davenport

childhood in Passaic, NJ

JD 200917JD 2009 16

participants take one fewer course than otherstudents. She still bristles at the memory.

“Though well intended, this requirementwas based on some notion that AfricanAmericans would not do as well, or meet thesame standards, as other students. My back-ground gave every indication that I would doas well, or even better than those grossstereotypical predictions suggested,” she says.

“That kind of broad, overly inclusiveassumption does not sit well with me. Peoplehave to be judged as individuals. That doesn’tmean we don’t think about how various groupshave been discriminated against and try toaddress persistent structural barriers thatcontinue to impede some groups from attain-ing equality. But you can’t build your responseto discrimination without being mindfulof the subtle influence of stereotypes.”

Dean Haddon instead enrolled atDuquesne Law School, where she received afull scholarship and went on to become editor-in-chief of the Duquesne Law Review. Aftergraduating in 1977, she served as a law clerkfor The Hon. Joseph F. Weis, Jr., UnitedStates Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit,and practiced at Wilmer Cutler & Pickeringin Washington, DC, before joining the facultyat Temple law school in 1981.

At Temple, Haddon taught courses onconstitutional law, torts, products liability,and race and ethnicity. She established herselfas a national scholar on constitutional lawand tort law, co-authoring two casebooks inthose fields, and published numerous scholarlyarticles on equal protection, jury participa-tion, academic freedom, and diversity.

“Whether it’s writing about torts or conlaw, or teaching a seminar on the jury, there’salways been a kind of civil rights edge to whatI’ve been doing; my focus has always beenshaped by a belief in equality, particularlyrespect for the rights of others,” says DeanHaddon. “I don’t fit the model of scholarswho get interested in one particular substan-

tive area of study and use the classroom andlaw journals to express their views divorcedfrom the context of the lived experiences ofpeople – I am particularly concerned aboutapproaches that take account of peoplewho are marginalized in the system.”

Haddon’s scholarship is a continuationof her family’s tradition of social activism.Her father was an active leader in theNAACP. Her aunt, Rachel B. Noel, led publicschool desegregation efforts in Denver, cul-minating in the U.S. Supreme Court’s rulingin Keyes v. Denver School District No. 1,

which made Denver the first city outsidethe south to receive instructions from theSupreme Court to address segregation.

Striving to improve access to quality edu-cation, at law schools and beyond, becameher true academic passion. Haddon quicklyattained national prominence for her efforts,earning appointment as a member of theexecutive committee of The Association ofAmerican Law Schools, a trustee of theLaw School Admissions Council, and co-President of the Society of American LawTeachers. Today she is a member of theCouncil of the American Bar AssociationSection on Legal Education and Admissionto the Bar, the official accrediting body ofAmerican law schools, and serves on a numberof committees of those other organizations.

“A real strength for Phoebe is her lead-ership in groups like the ABA and others

outside the academy. It’s given her an oppor-tunity to look at the challenges of legaleducation and the profession not just as amember of one school, or even as an academic,but from a very broad perspective,” says PaulBekman, Chair of Maryland Law’s Board ofVisitors. “At a time when law schools arefacing a scarcity of resources, and the legalprofession is rethinking ways of serving clients,she is the right person at the right time to beDean of our Law School.”

Other law schools had pursued Haddonfor deanships in the past, but she alwaysdemurred. Her experiences had made heran expert in not only legal education, butin law schools themselves. Dean Haddoncould tell when the fit just wasn’t right, orif an institution wasn’t poised for futuregrowth. From her first visit to MarylandLaw, she knew she had found a new home.

Haddon envisions a Law School that en-hances its quality by making itself more acces-sible to students from a wide range of racial,educational, and economic backgrounds. Shewants to broaden the definition of faculty ex-cellence to include a diversity of talents, fromtheoretical scholars, to outstanding classroomteachers, to policymakers, to practitionersproviding experiential learning opportunitiesconsistent with the mission and rich traditionof the law school. In so doing, she wants toattract people who share her vision of a schoolboth accessible and elite in its stature amongexcellent law schools.

“There are individuals here – faculty, staff,and students alike – who have the qualifica-tions to go anywhere. But they’ve made acommitment to Maryland because they believein what we can accomplish together. I seethat as very different from many other insti-tutions,” Haddon says. “When I hear themtalk about their reasons for choosing to be atMaryland, it’s very energizing to me. It rein-forces my belief that I made the right choicein joining them.”

“MY FOCUS HAS ALWAYS been shaped by

a belief in equality, particularly respect for the

rights of others.”

with daughter Cara and husband, Frank McClellan

—Dean Phoebe Haddon

new faculty member at Temple Law

JD 200919JD 2009 18

Who Will WatchWatchers?the

By Mike FieldIllustration by Martin O’Neill

SecuringConstitutional

Rightsin the

SecurityState

TRAFFIC IS TERRIBLE. Late for a meeting,your mind is working overtime on how toadjust your presentation. Suddenly, there’s aclearing ahead. You hit the gas—and fly rightinto a speed trap. Blue lights flash in yourrearview mirror.

On the side of the road the police officertakes your license and registration, returns tohis car, and feeds them through an opticalscanner. While you sit fuming your name isbeing checked at a remote government com-puter center that keeps track of the websitesyou visit, the books you buy online, your longdistance phone bills, and hundreds of otherpieces of both public and private information.Something in your past suggests behavior thatauthorities deem suspicious: perhaps yourname was included on a suspicious activityreport for using binoculars and taking pictures“with no apparent esthetic value” in LosAngeles, as police policy there now dictates.As you wait, two more squad cars appear,their lights flashing, and the officer—nowsounding a little nervous—says, “Please stepslowly out of your car and spread your arms.”

It may sound like a futuristic dystopiannightmare, but the possibility of this kind ofscenario is closer to reality than many peopleimagine. Government run or sponsored dataclearing houses are now active in nearly everystate. Known as fusion centers, they are fundedby the federal government as part of thenational response to the 9-11 terrorist attacks.Originally envisioned as a means of sharinganti-terrorism intelligence among federal,state, and local law enforcement agencies,fusion centers are generally unknown to the

JD 200921JD 2009 20

centers’ activities. The possible misuse of suchextensive new information collection andanalysis capabilities first drew attention inDecember 2007, when the American CivilLiberties Union published a white paper titled“What’s Wrong with Fusion Centers?” Thereport identified several areas of generalconcern, citing ambiguous lines of authority;participation by both private sector subcon-tractors and military personnel; the likelihoodof “data mining” in which centers go lookingfor suspicious individuals without probablecause; and the aura of excessive secrecy thatsurrounds the centers. It went on to suggest anumber of legal and political safeguards thatcould prevent misuse of the centers’ unprece-dented information gathering ability, drylyobserving that the best solution might be toabandon the concept entirely, and “return totraditional law enforcement techniques basedupon reasonable suspicion that have keptAmerica safe and free for over 230 years.”

Many observers—including report co-author and ACLU policy counsel MichaelGerman—believe there is no turning back.“The horse is out of the barn,” he said at theRoundtable. “Fusion centers are not goingaway. So what do they do? Are they beingused to collect information on lawful dis-sent? Are these places where informationon innocent activity is collected and shared?We are very concerned that because there areambiguous lines of authority there is nopolicing mechanism in place to prevent abuse.”

Throughout the day’s discussion partici-pants repeatedly expressed frustration at howlittle public information is available about fu-sion centers, even after six years. There was asense among the legal scholars and privacy ex-perts that they were steering without a com-pass into uncharted territory. Consequently,the Roundtable at times seemed not so muchpolicy debate as reconnaissance mission, witheveryone putting their heads together trying tounderstand what’s out there. It seemed a fittingventure for Danielle Citron, a self-described“cyber law geek” who has gained a national fol-lowing writing about automated systems likee-voting machines, cyber security, and cyberharassment in scholarly journals and the onlineforum Concurring Opinions [see essay on p.

XX]. The Roundtable, she says, was thenatural extension of her interests: “All of mywork is part of a broader story about howinformation about us can be used and mis-used.” She considers a moment and adds,“I’m a privacy person, obviously.”

Citron says her involvement in the cutting-edge field of cyber privacy rights “was prettyserendipitous,” evolving from her first lawarticle, published in 2006 in theUC DavisLaw Review, concerning the relatively newtechnology of Voice Over Internet Protocoland its likely effect on personal jurisdictiontheory. That investigation led her to contem-plate the legal ramifications of other novelelectronic technologies. The following yearthe Southern California Law Review publishedher article “Reservoirs of Danger: The Evolu-tion of Public and Private Law at the Dawn ofthe Information Age,” in which Citron drewan intriguing legal analogy between the collec-tion of personal information in large unregu-lated databases and the early industrial agecreations of large reservoirs of water to powermills. The water was harmless in repose butcould wreak havoc if the dams gave way—though it took many years and severaltragedies before the law evolved to protectthose downstream. By the same token, in thecyber world any one of us could be livingdownstream of a data dam without under-

“The horse is out of the

barn. Fusion centers

are not going away. So

what do they do? We

are very concerned

that because there are

ambiguous lines

of authority there is no

policing mechanism in

place to prevent

abuse.”

—Michael German,

ACLU policy counsel

public. Even legal scholars are unsure how theyfit within the country’s legal framework. Andno one seems to be quite sure what they do.

“There is this concept that computers cancreate a personal profile of individuals that willpredict if they are a potential security risk, butthe reliability of these models is unknown,”says Professor of Law Danielle Citron of themethods employed by fusion centers to siftthrough vast quantities of seemingly innocuous—but often private—data to try to identifypotential terrorists. “We are talking about itbut it is not yet in the public eye.” In order toadvance the discussion and further explorelegal issues surrounding government collectionand analysis of information about privatecitizens, Citron helped organize one of thenation’s first gatherings of legal scholars andprivacy experts focusing on fusion centers. TheTechnology and Privacy Roundtable, whichwas hosted by the School of Law during thespring 2009 semester, brought together twodozen experts from across the country for aday of discussion and debate.

From the start it became apparent that itis what is not known about fusion centers thatraises the greatest legal and privacy concerns.“People say, ‘Oh, you worry too much.’ I thinknow is the time to be considering these issues,”

said Roundtable co-leader Frank Pasquale, avisiting professor of law at Yale, and the LoftusProfessor of Law at Seton Hall University, atthe session opening.

But identifying the issues means knowingwhat, exactly, fusion centers are doing. Beyondbland generalities most centers refuse to say.And the task is made all the more difficult bythe fact that no two fusion centers are quitealike. The Department of Homeland Securityreports that as of February 2009 there were 58fusion centers around the country. To date, theDepartment has provided more than $380million to state and local governments to buildand equip the centers, but does not directlyoperate or control them. For the most part,fusion centers evolved locally on an ad hocbasis beginning around 2003. Each fusioncenter is run by a unique set of state andregional partners and, beyond having a generalmandate of information and intelligencesharing, they often have widely differingapproaches to what information they collect,and with whom and for what reasons theyshare it.

Fusion centers use powerful computers andsophisticated programming techniques toscan huge quantities of data, looking foranomalies that may indicate terrorist threats.But in addition to public records such ascourt appearances and tax records, the centerscan “fuse” private information such as phonebills and credit reports and even secret infor-mation provided by other government agen-cies. This is what happened when Baltimorepeace activists and antiwar demonstratorsfound themselves on federal terrorist watchlists after the Maryland State Police infiltratedtheir organizations and compiled extensivedossiers on the protestors in 2005 and 2006.The Baltimore Sun reported in 2008 that theundercover state police reports failed to iden-tify any criminal or even potentially criminalacts on the part of the protestors, yet nonethe-less entered their names on a database ofpotential terrorists or drug traffickers. “If youget put on a watch list that means airlines candeny your ability to fly. You can potentiallylose your employment if you are deemed asecurity risk, or perhaps be unable to get ajob, depending on who gets to see these lists,”notes Citron. “You’re talking about realconcrete harm.”

Both the theory and technologies thatundergird the fusion systems are new—and,say many experts, unproven—and little legalframework exists to regulate or direct the

Professor of LawDanielle Citron

says “I’m a privacyperson.” She is also

a national leaderin studying legal

issues surroundinggovernment reliance

on informationtechnologies.

JD 200923JD 2009 22

don’t need to go look, they already have theinformation. From the patterns on Amazonthey know your reading habits. So it becomescrucial that they can’t use that information.”

But that may require entirely differentlegislation than the current regulatory struc-ture concerning individual privacy andelectronic data. Congress passed the PrivacyAct of 1974 after numerous hearings and anumber of reports on such topics as nationaldata banks, commercial credit bureaus, andthe effect of computers on personal privacy. Inmany ways it is a bill very much of its time,reflecting an era before the Internet, when onlythe government could have the kind of massiveconcentration of computers needed to keepand search enormous databases of privateinformation. When signed into law the billestablished a code of fair information practicesgoverning the collection, use, and dissemina-tion of personal information maintained insystems by federal agencies. Information aboutan individual could not be disclosed fromthese systems without that person’s writtenconsent, or by specific statutory exception; andindividuals were enabled to access and amendtheir records in the case of faulty information.

In theory, at least, the Privacy Act protectscitizens from an intrusive, all-seeing govern-ment sticking its proverbial nose in people’sprivate business. But what the Act does notdo—and the reason it offers little in the way ofprotection today—is in any way regulate orcontrol private interests from intrusivelycollecting, analyzing, and selling data aboutindividuals.

Since most fusion centers involve at leastsome participation from commercial data

brokers, there is, practically speaking, no limitand no quality control on the kinds of infor-mation that might be sifted in search ofunusual patterns that indicate a threat. Anindividual whose purchases, opinions, Internetuse, political donations, or general activities aredeemed potentially subversive—by whom orby what standards to be determined by fusioncenter operators and not shared publicly—could be flagged for questioning, monitoring,or observation. Since private databases areoften error-prone and not subject to consumercontrol or review, Citron’s “garbage in/garbageout” dictum means the system would generatea relatively high number of “false positives”—flagging innocent individuals for furtherscrutiny or surveillance based on faulty infor-mation. The ACLU report points out thateven if fusion centers obtain the unrealisticallyhigh accuracy rate of 99 percent, in the U.S.population of 300 million citizens with ahypothetical 1,000 terrorists at large, 990of the terrorists will be “caught”—as will 3million innocent Americans. “We have decidedwe want to live with more false positives thannegatives,” says Citron. “This approach relieson crude algorithms which mean that, for alarge number of people, you’re going to bepulled aside.”

If, as most Roundtable panelists agreed,“the horse is out of the barn” for fusioncenters, then the need for effective legal over-sight and vigilant public scrutiny is com-pelling. The Roman poet Juvenal once asked,“Who will guard the guardians?” Ultimately,the experts concluded, there will need tobe some kind of online presence “watchingthe watchers.”

Since most fusion

centers involve at least

some participation

from commercial data

brokers, there is,

practically speaking,

no limit and no quality

control on the kinds of

information that might

be sifted in search of

unusual patterns that

indicate a threat.

Professor of Law andGovernment Mark Graber:

“We very often thinkof constitutional rights

purely in traditional para-digms that don’t reflect

current reality.”

standing the risk. “The reservoir metaphorsuggests we underestimate the dangers in-herent in damming up and collecting data,”Citron says, reflecting her article’s centralpremise that new economic eras bring aboutnew concepts of personal harm.

If large uncontrolled databases pose risks—as recurring stories of identity theft and widescale security breaches would seem to indi-cate—then the danger becomes even moreacute, says Citron, when the scope of infor-mation collected is hidden behind veils ofnational security. “What we are seeing withfusion centers is mission creep. They startedout as anti-terrorism tools, but now we areseeing their mission changed to the protectionof all infrastructure from all risk. The dangeris that they are combining unproved theoriesof data mining with use of private databasesthat may or may not be accurate. If thedata used is incorrect then the results are goingto reflect that. It’s the old story of garbage in,garbage out.”

But the centers are not without theirdefenders. According to Sean Kates ’07, a lawand policy analyst in the Law School’s Centerfor Health and Homeland Security, firstresponders such as police, fire fighters, andother emergency personnel are especiallylikely to see benefits in the centers. “Whatfalls apart first in a large scale emergency iscommunications,” he says. “First responders

look upon fusion centers as a positive becausethey provide a reliable central source of goodinformation. “I have had police officers verifyto me that fusion centers have been helpful tothem in looking across county lines, and acrossdiffering criminal records systems, to aid ininvestigations. From that perspective it’s agood concept,” says Kates.

Robert Riegle, who directs the state andlocal program office of the Office of Intelli-gence and Analysis, pointed to two recentsuccess stories involving law enforcement, intestimony last April before a subcommittee ofthe Committee on Homeland Security. Inone, a DHS operational specialist coordinatedwith federal officials on an Amber Alert for a3-year-old girl being taken out of the countryby a suspect wanted for rape and murder.Using information and contacts gatheredthrough a California fusion center, he was ableto track the youngster to a flight bound for theNetherlands; she was ultimately recoveredunharmed. In the second case, the Denverfire and police departments worked with aColorado fusion center to track and apprehenda suspect wanted for seven different fire-bombings of SUVs.

Skeptics note, however, that a good conceptdoes not always translate into good practice.In order to truly understand the dangers posedby fusion centers that operate with virtually nopublic awareness or oversight, we must firstinvent new ways of describing our rights, saysProfessor of Law and Government MarkGraber. “The great danger is that very often wethink of constitutional rights purely in tradi-tional paradigms that don’t reflect currentreality. For example, we think that freedom ofspeech means an individual can stand on thecorner and denounce the government withoutfear of interference. But today free speechoften involves someone on the Internet. Howdo we ensure free speech is not inhibited inthis environment?” Fusion centers, he says,pose a special challenge in this new world. “Inthe old days the concept of privacy meant thatthere was information that the governmentcouldn’t learn about you without going tocourt to obtain a warrant. And then they hadto go look. In the past if a government officialasked me, ‘What have you been reading?’ Iwould say, ‘None of your business.’ Now they

JD 200925JD 2009 24

Meltdownof aAnatomy

By Patrick A. McGuire

Figuring out what led to today’s economic mess

could hold the best clues for moving forward—and

averting the world’s next financial crisis.

SOME CALL IT A BLACK HOLE. OTHERS USE THE MORE SINISTER METAPHOR of “a darkmarket.” Robert Rhee, an associate professor at the University of Maryland School of Lawwho teaches corporate finance and corporate ethics says flatly “so much of the financialuniverse out there is unknown territory.”

His law school colleague, Prof. Michael Greenberger, the former federal regulator andnow oft-quoted explainer of the economic meltdown for NPR and 60 Minutes, speaksof “a shadow market.” This is a market, he says, that is understood by few, includingtop Wall Street insiders. Many of them, he says, had such little appreciation for the detailsof their risky practices that they not only caused unprecedented losses in the national andworld economies, but wiped out tens of millions—in some cases hundreds of millions—ofdollars from their own personal wealth.

“It’s crystal clear,” says Greenberger, “that except for some of the people doing thetrading, at the highest levels the CEOs, the top officers absolutely did not understand whatwas happening.”

JD 200927JD 2009 26

financial firms [that] presented challenges to our government’s stabilityof our financial system.” In response, the Obama administrationintroduced a proposal to reform the regulation of financial marketswith five key objectives: to promote robust supervision and regulationof financial firms; establish comprehensive supervision and regulationof financial markets; protect consumers and investors from financialabuse; improve tools for managing financial crises; and raise inter-national regulatory standards and improve international cooperation.

Since President Obama’s plan was proposed in June, many expertswho have analyzed the crisis point to regulation as the solution, financialindustry expert Christine Edwards ’83 cautions that simply creatingmore regulations won’t help.

“As a country we tend to legislate for the last problem and notfor the next,” says Edwards, whose practice as a partner in theChicago firm of Winston and Strawn focuses on regulatory policyissues in the securities and banking industries. “Trying to look forwardto determine what is the next meltdown ready to happen is muchmore difficult.”

The question of too much or too little regulation, she notes, or thetype of legislation needed right now is less pressing than asking whetheror not the right regulatory structure is in place to clearly inform andmonitor key financial industry players and consumers. She points to acurrent “patchwork quilt” of regulations that duplicates efforts betweenfederal, state, and local agencies.

Perhaps the gaudiest patch on that quilt—and one that most finan-cial experts now point to as an immediate cause of the current economicchaos—was the passage in December 2000 of The Commodity FuturesModernization Act. A bill introduced by former Republican Sen. PhilGramm, then chair of the Senate Banking Committee, it was embracedby both sides of the aisle, passed by wide margins and was signed intolaw just before Christmas by President Bill Clinton.

In effect it deregulated the trading of derivatives and default swapsby telling the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and theCommodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) that they hadno authority at all over them.

“Nobody’s complaining that stock trading put us in this meltdown,or that regulated futures trading put us here,” says Greenberger, whoserved on the CFTC from 1997 to 1999. “It’s this dark-marketderivative product, these private, bilateral transactions. Over the

counter derivatives are today an $800 trillion notional value market.We [the CFTC] thought when it was $27 trillion it ought to beregulated. We lost that battle.”

Derivatives are not new. Rhee says that derivatives have a Jekyll-Hydeduality. They can be used to hedge (mitigate) risk, but they can also beused to magnify risk-taking. As opposed to an investment in acommodity itself, a derivative is a bet on the future price of someother asset or index, such as stock or interest rates. The plainest instru-ments are futures and options. While investing in the standard com-modity future remains regulated, newer non-traditional forms such ascredit default swaps are private transactions that are legally traded“off the books” and subject to no official scrutiny.

That the risk-hedging derivative suddenly became an economybusting risk of its own derives from its use as a hedge against thefailure of investments in sub-prime mortgage securities. Accordingto Greenberger there is more investment money today tied up inderivatives than in stocks and bonds. Given that the supposed fail-safe factor of sub-prime mortgages—housing prices will never fall—actually failed, and given that no one was monitoring the dominoeffect of thousands of sub-prime mortgage foreclosures on otheraspects of the economy, the risks taken seem now in hindsight tobe so obviously reckless.

“There has to be a relationship between risk and return,” notes Rhee,a former New York and London investment banker with a WhartonMBA. “But proper risk taking is where Wall Street fell down.”

Rhee, who served as vice president in the investment banking armof Swiss Re in New York, as well as an investment banker with UBSWarburg and Deutchebanc Alex. Brown, an investment banker at UBSWarburg in London and a real estate investment banker at DeutchebancAlex Brown in Baltimore, believes unwise risk taking was a productof a subtle change in the way Wall Street firms have organized them-selves in the last several decades.

“A while ago,” he says, “Wall Street was made up of private companiesthat had their own capital. And it used to be you were using the firm'scapital so it was preserved in a way that made sense. People had a greaterinterest in their stock in the company. The thought was ‘I can’t blow upmy own firm because a large part of my wealth is tied up in it.’”

But, he notes, many of those firms began going public or weremerged with larger commercial banks with large balance sheets.

Exactly what was happening?As policy makers in Washington sift through the debris of

derailed derivatives and default swaps for answers to that question,Maryland School of Law faculty such as Greenberger and Rheesee a common cause for the meltdown.

“The biggest legal aspect to what’s happening now is thelack of regulation and the ineffectiveness of regulations,” says

Rhee. “Aside from that, the larger causal mechanisms of thiscrisis remain outside of the law.”

Of course, most mechanisms require lubrication forthem to work. In this case, according to a Maryland Lawgraduate who is now a prominent consultant to the finan-cial industry in regulatory and governance services, thegears of this crisis were greased by bad judgment at thehighest levels of government.

“The rampage in derivatives was an outgrowth ofthe Fed’s ‘easy money’ policies,” says Ellyn Brown’80, a current member of the board of directors of

NYSE-Euronext, Inc., the publicly traded entity thatowns and operates the New York Stock Exchange and the pan-Euro-pean stock exchange.

She speaks of “the federal legislative and executive branches’ ill-thought-out and mostly-uncoordinated promotion of home ownershipas an absolute good,” as further fuel to the meltdown. That, and whatshe sees as Congressional resistance to adequate oversight of Fannie Maeand Freddie Mac.

Brown, the Securities Commissioner for the State of Maryland from1987 to 1992, cites economist Robert Samuelson who “gives perhapsthe most organic explanation of the genesis of today’s crisis: ‘Takingfinancial stability for granted, money managers, bankers, traders,government officials and ordinary investors did things that destroyedfinancial stability.”

Once the derivatives market took off, adds Brown, “extending tothe over-the-counter market so that small town pension funds foundthemselves—perhaps unknowingly—in the market, derivatives thenbecame a major part of the problem and contributed enormously tothe market’s plunge.”

President Barack Obama said that the financial crisis has been aresult of “gaps and weaknesses in the supervision and regulation of

“There has to be arelationship betweenrisk and return. Butproper risk taking

is where Wall Streetfell down.”

—Robert Rhee

JD 200929JD 2009 28

Derivatives …Ripped from the Headlines

WHEN PROFESSOR MICHAEL GREENBERGER first offered his

course on “Futures, Options, and Derivatives” two years ago,

just 20 students applied for 25 spaces and the course was only

offered in the spring. Flash forward to 2009: 101 students en-

rolled and the class was offered both semesters.

That number includes Max Romanik, who said the class was

especially gratifying because the subject matter is ripped from

headlines. “It’s a great experience when the professor can walk

in with a statute that came off the presses that day. You don’t

have to study bizarre hypotheticals. The real world is happening

all around you right now,” he noted.

The ongoing global financial crisis has clearly spurred an in-

crease in student demand for law courses on derivatives, the

complex instruments that crippled credit markets and wreaked

havoc on bank balance sheets. Students are “hungry to decipher

how derivatives contributed to the crisis and excited about the

prospect of being involved in the regulatory overhaul that could

lead to a new phase in the history of global finance,” according

to a May 7 news article by Reuters, which profiled Greenberger’s

course at the School of Law.

Echoing the sentiment of many of her classmates, Meaghan

McCann told Reuters, “I wanted to understand how it happened

and what it will mean for our future ... and what we can do to

make sure it doesn't happen again.”

“Now it’s shareholder’s capital you’re using,” says Rhee. “The capitalyou can invest is whatever the executive committee or management willallow you to use in terms of your own trading activities. The risk-to-return relationship got skewed heavily. It encouraged excessive risktaking. That explains AIG [American International Group] It was as ifpeople were saying, ‘What we’re doing now is just printing money. Themore policies we write the more we sell this type of stuff. My year endbonus will be X million.’ Under those circumstance, people inside thatgroup were probably getting caught up in this.”

It was, he says, a classic house of cards and the incentives wereperverse; even substantially employee-owned firms like Bears Stearnswere not immune to the new psychology of risk-taking.

“We were in a bubble. The bubble psychology is that you don’t thinkyou're the person without the seat when the music stops. It’s alwaysgoing to be someone else. I can’t imagine that these bank executiveswere immune from that type of psychology.

“Don’t forget some of these bank executives had hundreds of millionsinvested in their own firms, so if it blew up, it blew up their entire networth. It leads me to think they knowingly engaged in excessiverisk taking without knowing how excessive their risk taking reallywas. They did not think the risks would be magnified down every chainof every transaction.”

How could supposedly savvy financiers so delude themselves?Greenberger says it was shockingly simple.

The sub-prime mortgage loans that were bundled together andsold as securities and collateralized debt obligations were, like mostloans, classified as senior, mezzanine and junior debt. As such theyreceived credit ratings from organizations such as Moody’s andStandard and Poor’s.

“They get Triple A ratings for the most secure senior debt,” saysGreenberger, “but that’s senior debt of sub-prime mortgages, given topeople who can’t afford to pay back. But many of the ‘brilliant minds’are believing they’ve got Triple A and Double A paper and they believethese are conservative, solid investments and they sell them as that.

People who buy them think they are conservative, solid investments,not understanding it was a Triple A rating of junk.”

The frosting on this devil’s food cake was the credit default swaps.Those who granted the sub-prime mortgages, and those who bought

them, took out what was essentially an insurance policy—so that if themortgage holder defaulted, the insurance paid back their investment.Though these policies were issued by insurance companies, they werenot called insurance because then they would fall under state and federalinsurance regulations. Labeled credit default swaps, they helped movethe delusion from the mortgagers to the insurers.

“They thought, ‘We’re getting premiums for this insurance for whichwe will never have to pay anything because there are no risks,’” saysGreenberger. “It wasn’t just AIG. Everyone was issuing insurance, callingit swaps and not setting aside reserves and it blew a multi-trillion hole inthe economy. They never thought housing prices would go down. Whenhousing prices went down the insurance got triggered. But unlike regu-lated insurance, they never had to set aside reserves to pay those policies.And you're talking about a minimum of $25 billion in insurance.”

The insurance became the ultimate factor in self-delusion, says Rhee.“I think the insurance fed into the psychology and affected executiveopinions as to how much risk they’d exposed themselves to.”

He says a former colleague on Wall Street who specializes in bondinsurance, told him recently, ‘We didn’t know X would lead to Ywould lead to Z would lead to a would lead to B. We knew X was aproblem. Or Y was a problem. But we didn’t connect all the dots.’”

Wall Street traders understood the individual problems, says Rhee,“but there was no one sitting at the top saying ‘Okay, I see the trail oftransactions and if something happens the trail of transactions will fallin a domino pattern like this.’”

In the meantime, a unified strategy for resolving the problem hasremained elusive. Many want to concentrate on and punish villains.Banks decry talk of new, day-to-day regulatory monitoring and insistWall Street be trusted to voluntarily clean up its mess. Reformers wanttough new legislation enacting more restrictive regulations. Greenberger

is concerned that President Barack Obama’s economic advisors are tooclose to Wall Street and are taking half-steps toward re-regulation.

“They want a private clearing house,” he notes. “I say that’s notenough. You have to have public exchange trading for these derivatives soyou have transparency. Not only to The Fed but to the public as a whole.It gives you an added set of regulatory tools that are being overlooked.”

One proposal would create a systemic risk regulator—someonewhose job would be literally to oversee these myriad off-the-bookstrades and find potential danger points or dominoes about to fall.

“The concept is totally appropriate given the level of sophisticationof institutional products,” says Edwards. “What happened in the systemthat caused meltdown was the piling on of risk from several differentsegments of the market simultaneously that were not looked at as acumulative matter. They acted as accelerants rather than as what theywere designed to do.”

Brown agrees that the general idea of regulating for systemic riskseems unavoidable “now that we’ve actually come face-to-face with therealities of our interlocked financial system.” However, she says, “Weneed to think not only about counterparty risk and all of the relation-ships that made Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers, and Merrill Lynchso vulnerable, but also to the nature of global systemic risk, acrossinstitutions and markets worldwide.”

The entire issue of risk regulation, she says “is perilous territory—thedanger being that over-regulation will impede the innovation necessaryto grow our economy. By definition, she says, innovation of any sortrequires risk.

“It is one thing for government regulators to be concerned about,and move to regulate outrageous leverage ratios,” says Brown. “It isquite another thing to ask a regulator to assess the risk inherent in anew financial product or service. Having been a regulator myself Iknow very well that regulation is a defensive art form. Regulatorsaren’t out there in the market thinking up new products and services.The regulators’ mission is to prevent problems. Thus, the regulators’inclination is to say ‘no’ rather than risk being wrong by embracinganything new and different.”

HIGH

JD 200931JD 2009 30

During uncertain times, like those we live in

today, it’s tempting to look to thefuture for reassurance … and for answers

to the problems currently besetting us. Are there

ways to temper the downsides of technology’s

unrelenting march forward? Can we find a way to

fix the global financial mess wefind ourselves in?

In the essays that follow, two Maryland Law

scholars bring thoughtful analysis to these issues.

Danielle Citron shows how “cyber mobs”have brought hate crimes to afrightening new level, and suggests how

the law can be employed to better protect victims.

And Robert Rhee looks at what went wrongin the world of investment bank-ing—and holds out hope for the emergence of

a new kind of business model.

HIGHANX I ET Y

Illustration by Kevin McSherry

JD 200933JD 2009 32

THE INTERNET IS A DOUBLE-EDGED SWORD. While it can facilitatethe empowerment of people who often face discrimination, it canalso be exploited to disenfranchise them. Anonymous mobs employcollaborative technologies to terrorize and silence women, peopleof color, and other minorities, effectively denying them the right toparticipate in online life as equals.

Consider the case of Bonnie Jouhari, a civil rights advocate andmother of a biracial girl, who was targeted by a white supremacistwebsite. The site posted her child’s picture and Ms. Jouhari’s homeaddress and showed an animated picture of Ms. Jouhari’s workplaceexploding in flames next to the threat that “race traitors” are “hungfrom the neck from the nearest tree or lamp post.” After Ms. Jouhariand her daughter began receiving harassing phone calls at home andwork, she left her job and moved. Today, neither she nor her daughtermaintains a driver’s license, voter registration card, or bank accountbecause they fear creating a public record of their whereabouts.

Another example: Kathy Sierra, a programmer and game developer,who maintained a popular blog on software development called “Creat-ing Passionate Users.” In 2007, anonymous individuals attacked Ms.Sierra on her blog and two other websites. Posters threatened rape andstrangulation. They revealed her home address and Social Securitynumber. Doctored photographs featured her with a noose beside herneck; another depicted her screaming while being suffocated by lingerie.After the attack, Ms. Sierra canceled speaking engagements and fearedleaving her yard. In April 2009, she explained that her “blog [once] was intheTechnorati Top 100. I have not blogged there—or anywhere—since.”

Many view these attacks as isolated instances of cyber bullying. Butanonymous mobsaccomplish some-thing far more sys-tematic than that.Rather than attackinga random mix of in-dividuals, cybermobs disproportionately target women. The non-profit organizationWorking to Halt Online Abuse explains that, from 2000 to 2007, 72.5percent of the individuals reporting cyber harassment identified them-selves as women and 22 percent identified themselves as men. Halfof those individuals had no relationship with their attackers. Similarly,the National Center for Victims of Crimes’ Stalking Resource Centerreports that approximately 60 percent of online harassment cases involvemale attackers and female targets. Cyber mobs often target lesbianand/or non-white women with particular virulence. They also focus onmen of color, religious minorities, and gay men.

When online mobs attack individuals because of their race, gender, orother protected characteristic, they damage individuals, their groups, andsociety in unique ways. To be sure, traditional criminal and tort law canreach some of their injuries. Criminal law punishes online harassmentand threats. For instance, the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA)punishes anyone using a telecommunications device without disclosinghis identity and with the intent to “abuse, threaten, or harass any personwho receives the communication.” Tort law would provide redress for acyber harasser’s actions. Individuals can bring defamation suits if onlinelies ruin their reputations. They can seek money damages for emotionaldistress that a defendant intentionally or recklessly causes. They can bringprivacy claims against defendants who publicly disclosed private factsthat would be “highly offensive to the reasonable person.”

These traditional remedies are important—but they have a limitedrole. Defamation law, for instance, remedies a plaintiff ’s reputational harmcaused by online lies, but does not address the stigma and economicinjuries that individuals experience. Nor does it redress the harm thattargeted groups and society suffer in the wake of bias-motivated conduct.

Civil rights laws are designed to respond to such harm. Antidis-crimination laws guarantee the right to be free of unequal treatmenton the basis of race, gender, or other protected characteristics. Civilrights remedies would combat a cyber mob’s interference with indi-viduals’ right to work and participate in discourse online as equals.

Existing civil rights laws provide tools to combat anonymous onlinemobs. The Civil Rights Act of 1968, for instance, punishes “force orthreat[s] of force” designed to intimidate or interfere with a person’sprivate employment due to that person’s race, religion, or national

origin. Courts have sustained convictionsof defendants who made death threatsover employees’ e-mail and voicemail.

Current law should be amended tocriminalize online threats made becauseof a victim’s gender or sexual orientation.Congress could amend VAWA pursuant

to its power to regulate an instrumentality of interstate commerce—theInternet—to punish anonymous cyber mobs that threaten individualsbecause of their gender or sexual orientation. The Department of Justicewould presumably support such a development as it currently encouragesfederal prosecutors to seek hate crime penalty enhancements fordefendants who subject victims to cyber harassment because of theirrace, color, religion, national origin, or sexual orientation.

Civil rights laws also sanction private lawsuits against cyber mobsfor their discriminatory actions. Courts have allowed plaintiffs tobring claims under section 1981 of Title racial minorities from “making

a living” in their chosen field. And targeted individuals can sue attackersunder Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for preventing themfrom making a living because of their sex.

Many will, of course, oppose a cyber civil rights agenda on thegrounds that it would interfere with our commitment to free speech.A cyber civil rights agenda, however, comports with First Amendmentdoctrine and free speech values. The First Amendment does not prohibitstates from using criminal and civil law to forbid threats. Threats ofviolence made via new technologies are not immunized from penaltyon free speech grounds.

Not only does a cyber civil rights agenda comport with FirstAmendment doctrine, it is consistent with prominent free speechtheories that emphasize the importance of autonomy, cultural innova-tion, and the promotion of truth. Restraining cyber gender harassmentis essential to defending the expressive autonomy of its victims.Although harassers express themselves through their assaults, theiractions directly implicate their targets’ self-determination and abilityto participate in political and social discourse. Self-expressionshould receive little protection if its sole purpose is to extinguishthe self-expression of another.

Some may insist upon protecting cyber gender harassment fromregulation to promote truth. Cyber gender harassment, however, haslittle to do with an exploration of truths. Rape and death threatstell us nothing about the victims—no truths are contested there.This is equally true of denial-of-service attacks and Social Securitynumbers. Even where online harassers make factual assertions, theanonymity of online communications prevents the marketplace ofideas from performing its curative function.

In short, cyber mobs inflict serious injuries that law must address.Combating their cyber assaults requires a comprehensive approach,one that includes traditional criminal prosecutions, tort remedies,and civil rights actions. Together, traditional remedies and antidis-crimination laws have great potential to deter, punish, and remedythe abuse of online mobs. We can harness law’s coercive power toreverse the backward-looking trend without sacrificing our com-mitment to free speech.Professor Danielle Citron’s scholarly interests include information privacy

law, cyberspace law, and administrative law, with an emphasis on legalissues surrounding the government’s reliance on information technologies.Before teaching, Professor Citron worked as a litigation associate atWillkie, Farr & Gallagher. She served as a law clerk for two years for theHonorable Mary Johnson Lowe of the U.S. District Court for the SouthernDistrict of New York. (For the full talk from which this essay was excerpted,visit: www.law.umaryland.edu/cyber)

WHEN ONLINE MOBS attack individualsbecause of their race, gender, or other protected

characteristic, they damage individuals, theirgroups, and society in unique ways.

By Danielle Citron

Civil Rightsin the Cyber World

THE FINANCIAL CRISIS OF 2008 HAS PERMANENTLY changed WallStreet. Conventional wisdom says that Wall Street—the “bad guy” inthe simple narrative—enabled the crisis by providing the financialtechnology, primarily securitization and derivatives, that brought theglobal financial system to its knees. I don’t disagree, except to suggestthat there is nothing intrinsically wrong with these financial instru-ments. But I take a slightly different perspective on the relationshipbetween Wall Street and the crisis. With the caveat that in hindsightwe are all an Einstein or a Buffett, I posit that one of the root causesof the crisis (and there are many) is the way Wall Street organized itselfduring the 1990s and beyond.

During this period, Wall Street was consolidating at an aggressivepace. The consumption of firms was startling. Consider these venerablenames from the not so distant past: Alex. Brown, Bankers Trust, SGWarburg, Donaldson Lufkin & Jenrette, Montgomery Securities,First Boston, JP Morgan, Salomon Brothers, Smith Barney, PaineWebber, just to name a few. Many of these firms were consumed bycommercial banks, which had enormous balance sheets but lackedthe intellectual capital and operational scale to break into the top-tierof investment banking. These banks included Deutche Bank, UBS,Credit Suisse, Swiss Bank, Barclays, Bank of America, Chase Manhattan,and the predecessors of Citigroup. These firms brought an enormousamount of new capital to the activity of investment banking.

Like most financial executives I accepted the idea that global financerequired intense concentration of capital and a global network ofintellectual capital and cross-selling capabilities within a single firmstructure. I was wrong. And so too were the titans of Wall Street whoengineered this mega-catastrophe. The consolidation combined stablecommercial banking with volatile investment banking. The invest-ment banking business now had far more capital. During this time aswell, vast pools of private capital, private equity and hedge funds, alsocame into prominence and were searching for returns. With the con-vergence of these factors, Wall Street was primed to take larger risks.

In hindsight as I try to make sense of what is happening now, mymoment of insight should have been a valuation study I performedfor a large financial institution. The question concerned the value of alarge fixed income trading operation. There were no comparable publiccompanies, and so no easy answer to the question. The work requiredan implied sum-of-the-parts analysis of bulge bracket (full service)investment banks. The study’s essential conclusion was that propri-etary trading operations, the type of activity that is at the epicenter of

this crisis, are and should be lowly valued. Even then, this made intuitivesense: Such activity requires large amounts of capital and are highlyrisky, thus necessarily resulting in low valuations.

When investment banks were independent, capital was preciousand judiciously applied. True, Wall Street is littered with firms thatself-destructed as a result of poor risk management. But notableaccidents and malfeasances aside, the risks of proprietary tradingwere contained by an appreciation of risks that could blow out one’scapital. This fear instilled discipline. In the past, Wall Street hadfocused on high value, high return activities—some of which such asmergers and acquisitions advisory require little capital.

The balance radically changed when Wall Street consolidated inthe 1990s. Firms were getting larger, fueled by an occasional shot ofanti-regulatory steroids. A landmark event was the conversion ofGoldman Sachs from a partnership to a public company. The logic is

apparent: bigger meant more capital; more capital required greaterreturns; greater returns are achieved only with greater risk. There areonly so many highly profitable, lower risk opportunities to goaround. Where would the returns come from? The banks had to takebigger risks, and this meant that the focus would turn to trading—that lowly valued, highly risky business, which was “juiced up” withhigh leverage to yield greater profits. Just as there was a global creditbubble that fueled the housing bubble, there was a glut of capital onWall Street, with commercial banks, investment banks and privatecapital all searching for returns. The resulting financial pressurestransformed Wall Street from a value-added, intermediation serviceprovider to an enormous hedge fund.

The organizational changes on Wall Street left it highly vulnerableto a seismic shift in market volatility, just the way a decade beforeLong-Term Capital Management was vulnerable to the abnormaldisturbance in the fixed income market triggered by the Russian debtdefault crisis. This time around, in the wake of the housing crash andcredit illiquidity, it is no surprise that the first casualties were theindependent investment banks that did not have the capital to with-stand a catastrophic shock: Bear Stearns, Merrill Lynch, and LehmanBrothers. These firms did not have the balance sheets to survive afinancial shock, or at least to delay an ultimate demise. I would neverhave thought that in one fell swoop, these firms would go the way ofthe dinosaur. Nor could we have foreseen that Goldman Sachs andMorgan Stanley, the two surviving patricians of American investmentbanking, would be forced to convert to banking holding companies.

So what is thefuture of invest-ment banking?Any answer isspeculative. Weknow that finan-cial institutionscannot be allowed to take the type of risks they took. In hindsight, itwas a continuing game of Russian roulette and ultimately the oddscaught up. We do not know whether universal banks will voluntarilydivest their investment banking operations. My guess: probably not.Investment banking is an alluring activity, and there may still be anappeal of cross-selling financial products under a one-firm umbrella.In any event, it seems that the genie is out of the bottle. Investment

banking is no longer the prime domain of American firms, and thefinancial market is truly globalized. We can only better regulate therisk-taking activities.

My hope is that, from the ashes of the 1990s and the financialcrisis of 2008 Wall Street, will come a different business model.Market forces have brought down an industry of titanic scale, andWall Street is certainly far smaller now than it was just a year ago.There is no longer a glut of capital in search of returns (indeed we havethe opposite problem in that capital is seeking shelter from risk). Inlife as in fashion, what was once old is sometimes the “new” new. Apossible future of investment banking may be a return to the oldmodel of focusing on intermediation services, high profitabilityproducts, measured risk taking, and a renewed appreciation that

capital is the lifeblood of a firm and itcannot be so easily staked. In any event,the crisis does not mark the death of WallStreet, or capitalism for that matter, butonly its transformation into a new form.

Assistant Professor Robert Rhee’s scholarlyinterests include risk-focused economic analyses

of legal and social problems. He has served as a law clerk on the U.S.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, and a trial attorney in theHonors Program of the U.S. Department of Justice. Professor Rhee alsohas worked as a vice president in financial institutions investmentbanking at Swiss Re, as an M&A investment banker at UBS Warburgin London, and as a real estate investment banker at DeutcheBancAlex Brown in Baltimore.

JD 200935JD 2009 34

MY HOPE IS THAT, from the ashes of the 1990sand the financial crisis of 2008 Wall Street, will

come a different business model.

By Robert J. Rhee

Reflections on the

Financial Crisisand Investment Banking

When Roger Wolf lived in Tunisia in the 1960s, he playedbasketball on a team in the hillside village of Le Kef, travelingwith team members to nearby towns for games. A Peace

Corps volunteer working on a public housing construction project atthe time, Wolf recalls that the lessons on the basketball court were asvaluable as his work assignment. As he got to know his fellow team-mates and others in the community, he says, their differences—he wasa Jewish American, a recent Harvard graduate living in an Arab country—didn’t seem to matter. “They knew me as a person foremost, and wewere able to talk about issues in a way that wasn’t hostile.”

Whether Wolf arrived in Tunisia with an empathetic ear, or honedhis listening skills while he was there, may be a kind of chicken-and-egg puzzle, but his ability to hear—and understand—bothsides of an issue defines his approach to the law, and his popularityas a teacher.

Wolf, who retired from the School of Law last spring, served onthe faculty since 1982. In 2001, he founded the Center for DisputeResolution at the University of Maryland (C-DRUM), which hasserved not only the schools at the University, but courts and agenciesthroughout the state. He also ran the school’s mediation clinic.Last year, he was the first recipient of the Robert M. Bell award foroutstanding contribution to Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)from the State Bar Association.

“Roger’s personal influence on advancing the acceptance of Alter-native Dispute Resolution within the legal community cannot beunderplayed,” says Rachel Wohl, executive director of the State’sMediation and Conflict Reso-lution Office. “He was a pivotalleader at several critical turningpoints in the development ofADR in Maryland,” she adds,noting that Wolf was one ofthe key drafters of Title 17 ofthe Maryland Rules, which advances the use of ADR in the courts.

She and others point out that it’s common today for most civiland family cases in Maryland to be referred to mediation at somepoint before they go to trial. They credit Wolf ’s tireless efforts, in nosmall part, for this seismic shift.

For Wolf, mediation and ADR has been a perfect fit. He hasbeen described by a fellow mediation trainer, Harry Fox, as some-one “who raises imperturbability to an art form.”

Says Wolf, “I like to think that I listen to people, and I can getpeople to listen to each other.” ADR, he says, is “not so much avoidingconflict as learning how to deal with it in a productive way.”

After the Peace Corps, Wolf attended law school at George Wash-ington University, and went to work for the Neighborhood LegalServices Program as a Reginald Heber Smith Fellow. Advocating fortenants’ and consumer rights in Lyndon Johnson’s Washington, he says,was gratifying. “We felt we were on the side of what was right.”

Wolf went on to head the Clinical Law program at CatholicUniversity, and took a hiatus from legal teaching to purchase afarm and operate a vineyard in Knoxville, MD, though he continuedwith private practice in Frederick. A few years after his return to

teaching, at the Universityof Maryland, he volunteeredto act as the reporter for thenascent Maryland State Barspecial committee on dis-pute resolution. The worklaunched his leadership effortsinto ADR.

Brian Tucker ’02 says his former teacher “embodies the best of thelegal profession, by combining intelligence, creativity, and compassion.”Says Tucker: “I see in Professor Wolf someone who is using the lawto do good things.”

JD 200937JD 2009 36

Such a humane person. Reasonable, calm, patient beyond words.One of the most solid human beings I know.

Such were the heartfelt accolades expressed by UMLaw studentsfor longtime dean James Forsyth, upon his retirement last spring.

In his role as assistant dean for registration and enrollment,Forsyth often encountered students during times of crisis—perhapsthey were struggling to pay a tuition bill, or complete enough creditsfor graduation. In response, he was “flexible, kind, and open to creativeproblem solving, but not a pushover,” says Dawna Cobb, assistant deanfor student affairs.

Forsyth joined the School of Law’s administration as assistant tothe dean in 1969. At that time, most of the students were whitemales from Maryland, presided over by two deans and about 20 facultymembers. (One of Forsyth’s duties was making sure the school’s manualtypewriters were in order so students could type their papers andexams.) Today’s student body is much more diverse, both in terms ofrace and gender, as well as geographically, with more than 40 percentof students hailing from outside Maryland.

The shift has brought new expectations from students, says Forsyth.Previously, he says, “institutions could get away with marginal services.Students went to class and that was it.” Today, “the school expectsmore of itself. There are a number of extra-curricular and studentactivities. It’s more than just a place to go to school.”

Over the years, Forsyth was closely involved in these transformations.In the early 1970s, he was director of financial aid for the University ofMaryland’s professional schools, and later worked as an admissionsofficer for the School of Law. In 1984, he became responsible forregistration and student records, before moving on to head the Officeof Registration and Enrollment.

“As a student, you never realized all that he did to keep the LawSchool running,” says Kenneth Aneckstein ’96, a partner at DLAPiper in Baltimore who has taught estate planning and estates andtrusts as an adjunct faculty member for seven years. “As an adjunct,I came to understand how just and wise he is. He takes into accountthe needs and concerns of various constituencies while keeping theSchool’s best interests at heart.”

One thing that never changed, says Forsyth, whose mission involvedensuring that students took and passed the required courses, is lawstudents’ ability to frame an argument. “I sometimes admired it whenstudents came into my office and presented a lawyer-like case toconvince me of why I should let them do something,” he says. Thoughhe didn’t always bend the rules, he says, “I could appreciate the validityof an argument well made.”

Judging from the outpouring of student responses at Forsyth’s retire-ment (gathered into a booklet by Cobb), he’ll be sorely missed. “He’snever one to seek the spotlight or be the center of attention,” wrote onestudent, “but he’s had a huge impact on the lives of students here.”

—Martha Thomas

ACreativeProblem Solver

“I could appreciate thevalidity of an argument

well made.” –James Forsyth

Longtime dean James Forsythshepherded a generation of studentsthrough times of crises.

“I LIKE TO THINK that I listento people, and I can get people

to listen to each other.”

By Martha Thomas

| FACULTY | Retirements

TheArt ofImperturbability

Roger Wolf has been pivotal tothe advance of Alternative DisputeResolution.

JD 200939JD 2009 38

| FACULTY | Promotions and Appointments

TheSchool of Lawcontinues toattract leading legalminds to join its

community of innovative scholars. Emergingandnationally

knownstars enhance the school’s outstandingacademic reputation.

Promotions

DANIELLE CITRON, VOTED “BEST TEACHER” by the law school’s students in 2005, waspromoted to Professor of Law and tenured. Her scholarly interests include information privacylaw, cyberspace law, and administrative law, with an emphasis on legal issues surrounding thegovernment’s reliance on information technologies. Her 2009 article “Cyber Civil Rights,” inBoston University Law Review, was cited as “groundbreaking” and became the subject of an on-line symposium at the Concurring Opinions legal blog. Other publications within the last yearinclude “Law’s Expressive Value in Combating Cyber Gender Harassment” in Michigan LawReview, “Open Code Governance” in University of Chicago Legal Forum, and “TechnologicalDue Process” in Washington University Law Review.

PETER DANCHINWAS PROMOTED TO ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR.

Before joining the faculty at Maryland in 2006, he was lecturer anddirector of the human rights program at Columbia University’s Schoolof International and Public Affairs. He has served as a foreign lawclerk to Chief Justice Arthur Chaskalson of the Constitutional Courtof South Africa. His areas of interest are international law, humanrights law, and comparative constitutionalism. His recent articles havebeen published or are forthcoming in the Columbia Journal ofTransnational Law, the Yale Journal of International Law, and theHarvard International Law Journal. His most recent book, UNITED

NATIONS REFORM AND THE NEW COLLECTIVE SECURITY (with HorstFischer), was published last year by Cambridge University Press.

VISITING LAW SCHOOL ASSISTANT PROFESSOR RUSSELL MCCLAIN

joined Maryland Law in 2006 as Coordinator of the AcademicAchievement Program. Prior to joining the School of Law, he servedas a Legal Writing instructor at Howard University. Professor McClainis currently developing a work in progress relating to the dischargeof student loans in bankruptcy under the Bankruptcy Abuse Pre-vention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005. His research agendaincludes a follow up to this article, relating to the student lendingparadigm generally, and, specifically, comparing student lending topredatory consumer lending. Professor McClain was recently honoredby the University of Maryland Chapter of the Black Law StudentsAssociation as the 2006-2007 Alumnus of the Year. He graduatedOrder of the Coif from the School of Law in 1995, going on topractice civil litigation in Los Angeles, and specializing in entertain-ment, consumer, and bankruptcy law.

NewFaculty

ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR OF LAWMICHELLE HARNER arrives from the University of NebraskaCollege of Law, where she served as an Assistant Professor of Law and was voted “Professorof the Year” by the upperclass students for two consecutive years. Harner is widely publishedand lectures frequently on various topics involving financially distressed entities and relatedlegal issues. Her most recent publications include “Corporate Control and the Need forMeaningful Board Accountability,” (94 Minnesota Law Review, forthcoming 2010); “TheCorporate Governance and Public Policy Implications of Activist Distressed Debt Investing,”(77 Fordham Law Review 703, 2008); and “Trends in Distressed Debt Investing: An EmpiricalStudy of Investors’ Objectives,” (16 American Bankruptcy Institute Law Review 69, 2008).Harner earned a JD at the Moritz College of Law at The Ohio State University, where sheserved as Executive Editor of the Ohio State Law Journal and also was a member of the Orderof the Coif. She earned a BA in English and Political Science at Boston College.

AFTER JOININGMARYLAND LAW IN 2008 AS ITS FIRST HEALTH LAW

& BIOETHICS FELLOW, LESLIE MELTZER HENRY is now an AssistantProfessor of Law. Her scholarly interests lie at the intersection ofbioethics, health policy, and law. Henry’s current research explores theuse of “dignity,” and considers the degree to which it has any moralforce as a normative concept in law and bioethics. Her most recentarticle in this area is “Human Dignity and Bioethics,” which waspublished this summer in the New England Journal of Medicine.Henry’s bioethics scholarship also includes a chapter in THE OXFORD

TEXTBOOK OF CLINICAL RESEARCH ETHICS entitled “What is FairSubject Selection?” (with James Childress), and an article in the AmericanJournal of Bioethics, which discusses the “Undesirable Implications ofDisclosing Individual Genetic Results to Research Participants.” Beforecoming to the law school, Henry was a Greenwall Fellow in Bioethicsand Health Policy at the Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics.She earned a JD at Yale Law School, an MSc in the History of Medicineat the University of Oxford, and a BA, summa cum laude, in bothHistory and Medical Ethics at the University of Virginia. She is currentlya doctoral candidate in the Department of Religious Studies (bioethicsspecialization) at the University of Virginia.

ASSISTANT PROFESSOR OF LAW AMANDA PUSTILNIK comes to thelaw school from Harvard Law School, where she served as a ClimenkoFellow and Lecturer on Law. She conducts research in the area of lawand science. Her current research includes work on models of mind inneuroscience and criminal law and on torts by semi-autonomousmachines. Pustilnik graduated from Yale Law School in 2001, whereshe was an editor of the Yale Journal of International Law and pub-lished notes on law and science. She then practiced litigation withCovington & Burling, where she focused on pharmaceutical and securi-ties regulation. Prior to practicing law, Pustilnik clerked for the Hon.Jose A. Cabranes on the United States Court of Appeals for the SecondCircuit. She graduated Harvard College, magna cum laude, and PhiBeta Kappa, with a concentration in History of Science. She also servedas the John Harvard Visiting Scholar at the University of Cambridge,Emmanuel College, where she was affiliated with the History andPhilosophy of Science department.

Two faculty were recognized for their contributions to thelaw school with promotions this year.

Three distinguished and highly qualified scholars and teachershave joined the School of Law faculty this year.

JD 200941JD 2009 40

| FACULTY | Publications, Presentations and Honors

Taunya Lovell Banks published the bookchapter “Balancing Competing IndividualConstitutional Rights: Raising Some Ques-tions” in LAW AND RIGHTS: GLOBAL PER-SPECTIVES ON CONSTITUTIONALISM AND

GOVERNANCE (Penelope E. Andrews & SusanBrazilli, eds., Vandeplas Publishing 2008) andthe articles “Dangerous Woman: ElizabethKey’s Freedom Suit - Subjecthood andRacialized Identity in Seventeenth CenturyColonial Virginia” in 41 Akron Law Review799 (2008); and “Trampling Whose Rights?Democratic Majority Rule and Racial Minori-ties: A Reply to Chin and Wagner,” 43 HarvardCivil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review127 (2008).

Barbara Bezdek contributed the bookchapter “Putting Community Equity inCommunity Development: Resident EquityParticipation in Urban Redevelopment” inLAW, SOCIETY AND PROPERTY, (Robin PaulMalloy and Nestor Davidson, eds., Ashgate2009); and presented “Stable Housing forSeismic Economic Times: Renewing RentalHousing at ‘This Defining Moment’ in U.S.Affordable Housing Policy,” for St LouisUniversity Public Law Journal Symposium“Property Rights and Economic Stability:

A Necessary Connection?” (February 2009);and “The Alinsky Prescription: Law Along-side Organizing,” for John Marshall LawReview Symposium on Law & Organizing(April 2009).

Brenda Bratton Blom published “Conver-sations on ‘Community Lawyering’: theNewest (Oldest) Wave in Clinical Education”Washington University Journal of Law and Policy(Fall 2008) (with Susan Brooks, Nancy Cookand KarenTokarz).

David Bogen published the articles “Mr.Justice Miller’s Clause: The Privileges orImmunities of Citizens of the United StatesInternationally,” 56 Drake Law Review 1051(2008) and “Indigenous Peoples and the Law- Ancient Customs: Modern Dilemmas,”2009 The Verdict vol. 1, 43-51 (QueenslandLaw Society, 2009); and presented “Rebuild-ing Slaughter-House: the Case’s Support forCivil Rights” at the Fourteenth Amendment:The 140th Anniversary Symposium at theUniversity of Akron School of Law, Akron,Ohio (October 23, 2008).

Patricia Campbell presented “IntellectualProperty Rights and Legal Attacks on Counter-

feit Goods” at the Symposium on Avoiding,Preventing, and Detecting Counterfeit Elec-tronic Parts, Center for Advanced Life CycleEngineering (CALCE), A. James Clark Schoolof Engineering, University of Maryland(September 9-10, 2008).

Danielle Citron published the article“Open Code Governance,” 16 University ofChicago Legal Forum 355 (2008) and“Cyber Civil Rights,” 89 Boston UniversityLaw Review 61 (2009), and will publish“Law’s Expressive Value in CombatingCyber Gender Harassment,” 108 MichiganLaw Review (forthcoming).

Douglas Colbert published the article“‘The Right to Counsel: Delay JeopardizesFairness,’ U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling inRothgery v. Gillepsie County,” Texas NationalLaw Journal (August 11, 2008).

Karen Czapanskiy published the article“The Right of Public Participation in theLaw-Making Process and the Role of theLegislature in the Promotion of This Right”in 19 Duke Journal of Comparative and Inter-national Law 1 (2008) (with Rashida Manjoo)and will publish FAMILY LAW: CASES, TEXT,PROBLEMS (forthcoming 2009) (with Ellman,Kurtz, Weithorn, Bix, and Eichner); and“Chalimony” NewYork University Journal ofLaw and Social Change (forthcoming).

Kathleen Dachille published the LawSynopsis “Pick Your Poison: Responses tothe Marketing and Sale of Flavored TobaccoProducts” (Tobacco Control Legal Consor-tium, February 2009) and presented “Fla-vored Tobacco Products: Legislative Activityand Options” and “Fire-Safe Cigarette Laws:How This Legislation Swept the CountryLike Wildfire” at the National Conferenceon Tobacco or Health; Phoenix, Arizona(June 11, 2009).

Abraham Dash presented “The CommonLaw of England,” Crofton Country Club,Crofton, Maryland (March 14, 2009).

Martha Ertman presented “The Upside ofBaby Markets” and “Developing a ScholarlyAgenda” at the National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy School of Law, Kiev, Ukraine(November 2008); “Incorporating SexualOrientation Issues into Teaching Contracts,”at the AALS Annual meeting in San Diego(Jan. 2009); and “Race Treason: The UntoldStory of America’s Ban on Polygamy” atWashington University in St. Louis’s work-shop on Family, State and Public Policy(March 2009) and at the University ofBaltimore Law School’s Legal Feminism Con-ference (April 2009).

Don Gifford published the article “Imper-sonating the Legislature: State AttorneysGeneral and Parens Patriae Product Litiga-

tion,” 49 Boston College Law Review 913(2008); and presented “The Future of PublicNuisance Litigaiton,” to the U.S. Chamberof Commerce—Institute for Legal ReformWebinar (December 11, 2008); “PublicNuisance Litigation: Protecting the Publicor Expanding Products Liability Law,” at theNational Center for State Courts JusticeRoundtable (November 21, 2008); and “PublicNuisance Litigation—The State’s New Regu-lator” at the American Bar Association AnnualMeeting, Tort Trial and Insurance PracticeSection (August 10, 2008).

David Gray presented “A No-ExcuseApproach toTransitional Justice” at the confer-ence on Conflict andTransitional Justice atEmory University (September 19-20, 2008).

Michael Greenberger served as a panelist“The Impact of Financial Markets on thePrice of Oil” Organization of the PetroleumExporting Countries (OPEC) and the Euro-pean Union (EU) Workshop, Vienna, Austria(April 30, 2009); and presented “Toward aNew Theory of Regulation: Ferment in theFace of Crisis,” The Tobin Project’s SecondGovernment & Markets Conference, Yulee,Florida (April 24-26, 2009).

Deborah Hellman published the article“Prosecuting Doctors for Trusting Patients,”16 George Mason Law Review 701 (2009);gave presentations on her book WHEN IS

DISCRIMINATION WRONG? at the SyracuseUniversity Law School Faculty ColloquiaSeries (February 16, 2009), at the Associa-tion of Practical and Professional EthicsAnnual Meeting (March 6-7, 2009), and atthe Woodrow Wilson International Centerfor Scholars (Sept. 16, 2008); and presentedthe paper “Willfully Blind for Good Reason”at the University of Toronto Legal TheoryWorkshop (January 16, 2009) and theUniversity of Southern California Law School(March 13, 2009).

Diane Hoffmann published the articles“Treating Pain v. Reducing Drug Diversionand Abuse: Recalibrating the Balance in OurDrug Control Laws & Policies” in 1 St. LouisUniversity Journal of Health Care Law andPolicy 231 (2008); “Achieving Quality andResponding to Consumers—The MedicareBeneficiary Complaint Process: Who ShouldRespond?” 5 Indiana Health Law Review 9(2008) (with Virginia Rowthorn); “BuildingPublic Health Law Capacity at the LocalLevel,” 36 Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics6 ((Special Supp., Fall 2008) (with VirginiaRowthorn); and will publish the article“Physicians Who Break the Law” in St. LouisUniversity Law Journal (forthcoming 2009).

Faculty Publications,Presentations, and

HonorsThe School of Law’s faculty has a well-deserved reputation for

producing outstanding legal scholarship, as evidenced by the rich

array of books, articles, working papers, and conference presen-

tations they complete each year. The entries on the following

pages represent only a sampling of the diverse scholarly activities

of our academic community. For a more complete listing and ac-

tual links to articles, visit www.law.umaryland.edu/scholarship.

TAUNYA LOVELL BANKS

DIANE HOFFMANN

JD 200943JD 2009 42

| FACULTY | Publications, Presentations and Honors

Susan Leviton published the article “Pre-venting Schools from Becoming the Pipelineto Prison,” 42 Maryland Bar Journal 3(May/June 2009) (with others); and pre-sented “The Urban Child in Context:Families, Schools, Neighborhoods and Lives”at the Urban Child Symposium, Universityof Baltimore School of Law, Baltimore,Maryland (April 2, 2009).

PaulaMonopoli published “Why So Slow:A Comparative View of Women’s PoliticalLeadership,” 24 Maryland Journal of Inter-national Law 857 (2009); presented “Gender,Power & the Presidency,” Moderator, Sympo-sium on the 60th Anniversary of the UniversalDeclaration of Human Rights, University ofMaryland School of Law, Baltimore, Maryland(October 24, 2008); and “Gender and Consti-tutional Design,” Symposium on ElectionLaw, Journal of Race, Religion, Gender andClass, University of Maryland School of Law,Baltimore, Maryland (October 16, 2008).Professor Monopoli was also an invitedmember of the Thought Leaders Roundtableconvened at the University of Texas Summiton Women and the Law (April 30, 2009).

Robert Percival published the new sixthedition of his best-selling casebook Environ-mental Regulation: Law, Science & Policy(2009); and presented the 15th AnnualLloyd K. Garrison Lecture at Pace UniversitySchool of Law (April 1, 2009). He also madepresentations at the law schools at Harvard,Duke, American University and Vermont,addressed the IUCN Academy of Environ-mental Law in Mexico City (Nov. 10, 2008),and the Congress of the World Jurist Associ-ation in Kiev, Ukraine (March 24, 2009). InMay 2009 he served as an environmentalexpert for the U.S. State Department in China,delivering 14 lectures in six Chinese cities atuniversities, think tanks, consulates, the ChineseMinistry of Environmental Protection, andthe Guangzhou Lawyer’s Association.

Michael Pinard served as a panelist for“The Future of Clinical Legal Education” atthe University of Maryland Clinical Law Pro-gram’s 35th Anniversary Conference, Curricu-lum Reform: Linking Theory and Practice,(March 6, 2009); and “A Comparative Per-spective on the Collateral Consequences ofCriminal Convictions: Lessons the UnitedStates Can Learn from England and Wales,Canada and South Africa,” at the New YorkUniversity School of Law Faculty Workshop(February 18, 2009); and presented “The CivilRights Dimensions of Prisoner Reentry: TheImpact on Individuals, Families and Commu-nities” as the Dr. Martin Luther King Com-memorative Speaker for the Public InterestLaw and Policy Speakers Series, WashingtonUniversity School of Law (January 22, 2009).

Garrett Power published the article “Regu-latory Takings: A Chronicle of the Construc-tion of a Constitutional Concept,” 23 BrighamYoung University Journal of Public Law 221(2009); and authored the entries “Takings” forthe ENCYCLOPEDIA OF SUPREME COURT

HISTORY (2008), “Philip Perlman” in the YALE

BIOGRAPHICAL DICTIONARY OF AMERICAN

LAW (2009), and “Regulatory Takings” in theENCYCLOPEDIA OF THE SUPREME COURT OF

THE UNITED STATES (David S. Tanenhouseed. 2008).

Peter Quint published the articles “TheUniversal Declaration and South African Con-stitutional Law: A Response to Justice ArthurChaskalson,” 24 Maryland Journal of Interna-tional Law 40 ( 2009); “60 Years of the BasicLaw and its Interpretation: An AmericanPerspective,” 57 Jahrbuch des öffentlichen Rechtsder Gegenwart 1 (2009); and “David Currieand German Constitutional Law,” 9 GermanLaw Journal 2081 (2008).

Shruti Rana published the articles “‘Stream-lining’ the Rule of Law: How the Depart-ment of Justice is Undermining JudicialReview of Agency Action,” 2009 Universityof Illinois Law Review 101 (2009) and “FromMaking Money Without Doing Evil to DoingGood Without Handouts: The Google.orgExperiment in Philanthropy,” 3 Journal ofBusiness &Technology Law 87 (2008); and herarticle “Fulfilling Technology’s Promise:Enforcing the Rights of WOMEN CAUGHT IN

THE GLOBAL HIGH-TECH UNDERCLASS,”WAS REPRINTED IN WOMEN, SCIENCE AND

TECHNOLOGY, A READER IN FEMINIST

SCIENCE STUDIES (Mary Wyer, et. al. eds.,Routledge, 2008).

William Reynolds published the articles“Survey of the Law of Cyberspace—ElectronicContracting Cases 2007-2008” in 64 TheBusiness Lawyer 199 (2008) (with JulietMoringiello); “The Story of the Full Faith andCredit Clause,” 41 Maryland Bar Journal 34,(Nov/Dec 2008); and presented “E-Com-merce in Maryland” at the Maryland JudicialInstitute, Annapolis, Maryland (October 16,2008). His book UNDERSTANDING CONFLICT

OF LAWS (3d ed.) (with William Richman)was translated into Japanese.

Robert Rhee published the articles “TowardsProcedural Optionality: Private Ordering ofPublic Adjudication,” 84 New York UniversityLaw Review 514 (2009) and “Tort Arbitrage,”60 Florida Law Review 125 (2008).

Karen Rothenberg published the article“Recalibrating the Moral Compass: Expanding‘Thinking Like a Lawyer’ Into ‘Thinking

Like a Leader’ in 40 University of ToledoLaw Review 411 (2009); and presented“Judging Genes: Implications of the Sec-ond Generation of Genetic Tests in theCourtroom” at the 2009 Annual Deans’Workshop/Conference of Chief JusticesMidyear Meeting, Scottsdale, Arizona(January 26, 2009).

Jana Singer published the book RESOLV-ING FAMILY CONFLICTS (Ashgate Press,2008) (edited with Jane Murphy); the article“Dispute Resolution and the Post-divorceFamily: Implications of a Paradigm Shift”in 47 Family Court Review 363 (2009);and presented “Hearing Children’s Voicesin Family Court Processes: Which Way isForward?” at the Association of Family andConciliation Courts Annual Conference(May 28, 2009) and “The Evidence is In:The Results of the University of MarylandSchool of Law Alumni Survey,” at theConference on Retaining and AdvancingWomen in Challenging Economic Times,University of Maryland School of Law(April 24, 2009) (with Paula Monopoli).

Maxwell Stearns presented “How Narrowis the Narrowest Grounds Doctrine?,” Mid-west Law and Economics Annual Meeting,Chicago, Illinois (October 4, 2008); and“The Median Voter Theorem and UniversalVoting Participation by Judges,” with EugeneKontorovich, Midwest Law and EconomicsAnnual Meeting, Chicago, Illinois (October 3,2008); and will contribute the book chapter“An Introduction to Social Choice” in ELGAR

HANDBOOK ON PUBLIC CHOICE (Daniel A.Farber and Ann Joseph O’Connell eds.,forthcoming).

Rena Steinzor published the article“Capture, Accountability, and RegulatoryMetrics,” 86 Texas Law Review 1741 (2008)(with Sidney A. Shapiro) and presented“Government Performance and Results Act,Regulatory Metrics, and Government Account-ability,” Panelist, 2008 ABA AdministrativeLaw Conference, Washington, DC (October17, 2008).

Lawrence Sung published the article “Inthe Wake of Reinvigorated U.S. SupremeCourt Activity in Patent Appeals,” 4 Journalof Business & Technology Law 97 (2009).

David Super published the article “Labora-tories of Destitution: Democratic Experi-mentalism and the Failure of Anti-PovertyLaw,” 157 University of Pennsylvania LawReview 541 (2008); presented “Against Flexi-bility,” UCLA Law School Faculty Work-shop, UCLA Law School, Los Angeles,California (October 17, 2008); and willpublish “Defending Mortgage Foreclosures:Seeking a Role for Equity,” 42 ClearinghouseReview (forthcoming 2009).

Michael Van Alstine published the article“Taking Care of John Marshall’s PoliticalGhost” in 53 St. Louis University Law Journal93 (2008) and contributed the book chapter”The Role of Domestic Courts in TreatyEnforcement: Summary and Conclusions,”in THE ROLE OF DOMESTIC COURTS INTREATY ENFORCEMENT: A COMPARATIVE

STUDY (D. Sloss, ed., Cambridge UniversityPress, forthcoming 2009).

Katherine Vaughns presented “Removalto Federal Court: How Defendants Do It.How Plaintiffs Stop It.” at the The Bar Asso-ciation of Baltimore City’s Milton TalkinLecture Series (January 7, 2009).

EllenWeber presented “Reluctance of andRestrictions on Physician Prescribing,”Obstacles to the Development and Use ofPharmacotherapies for Addiction (November7, 2008); “Disability Discrimination andHealth Privacy Standards,” University ofMaryland School of Medicine, AddictionPsychiatry Fellows Forum, Baltimore,Maryland (December 22, 2008); and “Protect-ing Civil and Health Privacy Rights of Patientswith Addiction” at the Maryland Society ofAddiction Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland(March 7, 2009). She also received the 2009Public Citizen Award from the NationalAssociation of Social Workers – Maryland.

DeborahWeimer served as a panelist for“Medical-Legal Partnerships in the Law SchoolSetting” at the 2009 AALS Annual Meeting(January 9, 2009) and presented “CurrentIssues Facing Women Living with HIV” at theUMB Interdisciplinary Conference for Law,Medicine, Social Work, Nursing, andPharmacy students (January 11, 2009).

Marley Weiss participated in the Round-table Session, “Towards More Effective LaborGovernance” at the Conference on Human-izing Trade/humaniser le commerce, sponsoredby the Global Labour Governance (GLG)Project, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (April27-29, 2009); and presented “The EmployeeFree Choice Act” at the National Lawyers’Guild Regional Conference, University ofMaryland School of Law, Baltimore, Maryland(March 28, 2009).

Gordon Young published the article “Justify-ing Motive Analysis in Judicial Review,” 17William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal 191(2008); and authored the entries “JurisdictionStripping” and “United States v. Klein” in theENCYCLOPEDIA OF THE SUPREME COURT OF

THE UNITED STATES (Gale 2008).

ROBERT PERCIVAL

DAVID SUPER

BLSA Celebrates Intellectual Relevance

SEVERAL HUNDRED STUDENTS, alumni and faculty gathered Feb. 21 for

the annual Black Law Students Association Banquet, dedicated this year

to the theme “Intellectual Relevance.”

Julie D. Goodwin ’82, Morgan State University’s General Counsel, was

named Practitioner of the Year. The Hon. Wanda Heard ’82, Associate

Judge for Baltimore City Circuit Court (pictured receiving her award from

BLSA Parliamentarian Nancy Oyedele ’10), was named Alumna of the Year.

U.S. Representative Donna Edwards, the first African American woman to repre-

sent Maryland in Congress, delivered the keynote address. The Impact Award, given

to a member of the Law School community who has contributed a significant amount

of time and assistance to help in the furtherance of BLSA’s programming and overall

goals, was presented to the Office of Institutional Advancement as a whole.

JD 200945JD 2009 44

| STUDENTS | Events

2009CommencementTHE SCHOOL OF LAW’S MAY 15Hooding Ceremonywas enough to stop traffic – literally. The faculty and235 members of the Class of 2009 gathered beforethe ceremony in Westminster Hall, then processedtogether down a closed Fayette Street to the Hippo-dromeTheatre, where an overflow crowd of family andfriends awaited.

U.S. Congressman Elijah Cummings ’76 deliveredthe keynote address and Lisa Elder and Bob Maddox,Presidents of the Day and Evening graduating class,respectively, announced that a record 96 graduates hadcontributed to the Class Gift. Later, graduates attendedUMB’s Commencement Ceremony at the 1st MarinerArena, where the speaker was Maryland GovernorMartin O’Malley ’88.

StudentsMakeWinningArgumentsMARCH 11 WAS A DAY DEVOTED to appellate advocacy.

At noon, the final round of the 39th annual Morris Brown

Myerowitz Moot Court Competition took place in the

Ceremonial Courtroom, with Dana Backlund earning the

nod for best oral argument from judges Diana Gribbon

Motz of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit,

Albert J. Matricciani, Jr. ’73 of the Court of Special Appeals

of Maryland, and Phyllis D. Thompson of the D.C. Court

of Appeals. In addition to finishing as a runner-up for

best argument, Joey Tsu-Yi Chen was awarded the prize

for best brief.

That evening, the Moot Court Board presented the

dinner-discussion “Appellate Advocacy: Legal Specialty

or Legal Necessity?”

JudgeMatricciani, Mike Leotta of the U.S. Department of

Justice, Kevin Arthur ’87, Jessica V. Carter ’92, and Peter

Nothstein ’05 offered their personal and professional

insights on the changing nature of appellate advocacy and

the need for the legal profession to address these changes.

2008 champion Brian Robinson presented this year’s award toDana Backlund.

Joey Tsu-Yi Chen was one of the finalists for best oral argumentand won the award for best brief.

In an overflowing Courtroom, former Myerowitz champions MarcDeSimone ’04 (left) and Megan Nichols ’05 (right) received seatsof honor in the jury box.

When disaster strikes, Juliet Choi ’03 does some of her bestwork. A senior director at the national headquarters of theAmerican Red Cross (Washington, D.C.), she helps to

manage and execute national disaster relief operations, supporting chapternetworks and thousands of volunteers, and serves as the principle-in-chargefor NGO strategic partnerships for the Red Cross. At one point last fall—as hurricanes Fay, Gustav, Hanna, and Ike overlapped—she oversaw simul-taneous relief efforts in 14 states with more than 5,000 volunteers.

Just a few months earlier, the Midwest flood season was one of theworst in more than 15 years. And that same year saw more than 160tornadoes in the U.S., one of the largest numbers in a decade. Duringnational-scale disasters, Choi helps to administer the day-to-dayexchange of immense amountsof information among localchapters, government, and non-governmental agencies.

After earning her law degreein 2003, Choi set out to pursuethe practice of civil rights, notdisaster relief. After completing a clerkship with the Hon. Dennis M.Sweeney (Circuit Court, Howard County), she began a two-year civilrights fellowship at the Asian American Justice Center in Washington,where she focused on national origin discrimination. Then, a year intoher fellowship, while working to amend the Stafford Act to ensureprotection of limited English speakers in times of disaster, HurricaneKatrina hit.

“I started receiving random phone calls from Gulf Coast Asian com-munities,” says Choi. She made nearly a dozen trips to the Gulf Coast,attending community meetings, fact-finding, and doing legislative legalresearch. This turn was “completely unintentional and unplanned,” shesays, “but it made a lot of sense to get into Katrina advocacy.”

Working with immigrants from Southeast Asia—Vietnameseand Cambodians mainly—Choi saw at close range how devastat-ing language barriers can be. Many of the Asian hurricane survivorswere not aware of emergency support services, most had never heardof FEMA, and some were fearful of asking for assistance. “You seethe issue to the nth degree when all systems are overwhelmed anddysfunctional,” says Choi.

When her fellowship ended in 2006, she joined the Red Cross.She sees systems change advocacy—as a critical part of her career.Her work is complex, but her goal is simple: She wants to help buildrobust, flexible frameworks that provide equal access to all. “I wanteverybody to have access to the table.”

JD 2009 46 JD 200947

| ALUMNI |

An Investmentin Law Pays

UnexpectedCelebrating the distinguishedcareer of Joe Hardiman ’62, one-time CEO of NASDAQ.

When times are most devastating,Juliet Choi ’03 steps in.

Joseph Hardiman ’62 didn’t intend to go into the investment business.But, following his own advice, he kept his mind open to possibili-ties—and went on to become president and CEO of the NASDAQstock market.

“I went to law school with the full intention of spending my careerin the law, as a practicing attorney,” says Hardiman, and his careerillustrates a tenet he says is as true today as it was 40 years ago. Lawdegrees, he says, “clearly do not confine one to the practice of law.”

After earning his JD at the School of Law, he began his careerconventionally enough, practicing law in Baltimore for five years. By1968, though, Hardiman began to widen his scope. He was recruitedby the Baltimore-based banking house Robert Garrett and Sons, Inc.,which was later sold to Alex. Brown and Sons. There, Hardimanquickly rose through the ranks, ultimately becoming Alex. Brown’smanaging director and chief operating officer.

The work prepared him well for what was to come: In 1987, hesigned on to lead the investment world’s foremost self-regulatory organ-ization, the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD)—mostfamiliar for its wholly owned subsidiary, NASDAQ.

Hardiman said at the time that he would stay at least five years, butno more than 10. “I had the strong feeling that the person at thehelm has to be there five years to make an impact … but if you staymore than 10 years, you’ve probably stayed too long,” he says. Duringhis nine and a half years at the helm of NASDAQ, it grew into theworld’s second largest private equity market, second only to the NewYork Stock Exchange. Daily volume of trading increased from 130million shares to more than 550 million shares.

Under his leadership, NASDAQ adapted corporate governancerequirements and increased listing standards for all NASDAQ NationalMarket companies, improving protection for investors and pavingthe way for parity of treatment under state blue sky laws. He’s alsocredited with introducing a marketing and customer driven ethic intoan organization that was traditionally more bureaucratic.

Throughout that time, and in particular since his retirement in1997, Hardiman has been an active philanthropist in Baltimore andbeyond. He serves on the Board of the University of MarylandBaltimore Foundation, Inc., where he is a representative to the invest-ment committee that manages the system-wide endowment. He wasalso chair of the Board of Visitors during the fundraising campaign thatgave the School of Law its much-admired building. And it was hisgenerosity that served as the catalyst to establish the new Karen H.Rothenberg Fund for Public Service. Last spring, Hardiman washonored with the University of Maryland School of Law Distin-guished Graduate Award.

In reflecting on his career over the last five decades, Hardiman says,“I’ve watched in awe as the economies of the world have grown closertogether, keeping pace with their clients.” Another marvel has been theimpact of technology. When he started, the floor-based exchanges sawtransactions of about 2 million shares per day, and they had to closeone day a week to keep up with the paperwork. Now markets are ableto handle transactions of billions of shares daily.

Those beginning their financial careers today “have challenges wedid not have, and that is sobering,” he concedes. But he stresses thevalue that the law’s Socratic method of teaching has to any number ofprofessions. “Today,” Hardiman says of those hitting the job market,“there is a wide range of possibilities.”

—Christine Grillo

“I’ve watched in awe asthe economies of the

world have grown closertogether.” –Joseph Hardiman

“I WANT EVERYBODY to haveaccess to the table.”

By Christine Grillo

CoolChaosthe

Amidst

Dividends

Choi’s positionas a seniordirector at theAmerican RedCross oftentakes her intothe field in thewake of naturaldisasters.

JD 2009 48 JD 200949

| ALUMNI |

ACelebrationof LeadershipONMAY 7, MORE THAN 200 MARYLAND LAW GRADUATES and friends gathered at Baltimore’s Center

Club for “A Celebration of Leadership,” an event honoring Dean Karen Rothenberg and distinguished

Law School graduates. Over the past decade, Dean Rothenberg – who plans to return to the faculty

after a sabbatical – led the Law School to new heights of achievement. Paul Bekman ’71, Chair of the

Board of Visitors, announced at the celebration that more than 160 individuals contributed over $180,000

to establish the Karen H. Rothenberg Fund for Public Service.

(left) Alumni Board PresidentJason St. John ’00

(below) Ed Feingold ’58,Alice and Eugene Schreiber’60, Faith Feingold

Dean Rothenberg with U.S. CongressmanElijah Cummings ’76

(left) Board ofVisitors Chair PaulBekman ’71

(right) OsborneScholar Bryan Saxton’09 and Board ofVisitors memberHamish Osborne ’86

(left) Renowned photographers Larry Gibson, Professorof Law, and The Hon. Robert M. Bell, Chief Judge of theMaryland Court of Appeals

(below) University System of Maryland ChancellorWilliam E. Kirwan with Distinguished Graduate Awardrecipient Joseph Hardiman ’62

ON FEB. 6, TOP CHINESE PUBLIC interest lawyer Zhang Jingjing (center,

with Environmental Law Program Director Robert Percival, left) and Joel

Fedder ’58) delivered the Fedder Lecture, “Taking the Long Distance Bus

to the Court: A Practitioner’s Perspective of Environmental Litigation in

China.” Known as the “Erin Brokovich of China,” Jingjing is Director of

Litigation for the Center for Legal Assistance to Pollution Victims. She helped

win the largest class-action environmental suit in Chinese history, when

more than 1,700 villages in Fujian Province were awarded compensation from

a factory that had dumped chlorine and chromium into the water supply. The

lecture was supported by the Fedder Environmental Fund, established in 2007

through the generosity of Mr. Fedder and his wife, Ellen.

JD 200951JD 2009 50

| ALUMNI | Events

SINCE ITS INCEPTION FIVE YEARS AGO, theLeadership Scholars Program has providedfinancial support for more than 150 outstand-ing students. Christine Edwards ’83 (pictured),who permanently endowed a full scholarshipfor a student concentrating in business law,spoke at a May 8 luncheon honoring the Classof 2009 Leadership Scholars. More than 80current and past Leadership Scholars, includingAnne B. Gallgher Memorial Scholarship recip-ient Ryan Palmer ’09 (pictured with PeterHolland and Peggy Gallagher), have given tothe Leadership Scholars Legacy Endowment toprovide support for future Leadership Scholars.With Making an Impact campaign co-ChairHenry Hopkins ’68 has pledging to match everydollar made to the endowment, the effortshas already raised more than $73,000.

CURRENT AND FORMER STUDENTS from the School of Law’s Evening Program

came together at their annual reception on Feb. 13, swapping war stories

about juggling classes and full-time jobs, and honoring a pair of individuals for

their service to the program. The Evening Program Service Award, recognizing

an individual’s exemplary contributions of service and leadership to the students

of the evening program, was awarded to Senior Judicial Fellow John F. Fader, II

’68. The A.J. Bellido de Luna Leadership Award, established by the 2004 Evening

Division Graduates to recognize leadership shown by a graduating Maryland

Law student, was presented to Elizabeth A .Green ’09.

ON APRIL 7, THE LAW SCHOOL welcomed more than 20 membersof the Class of 1959 to a luncheon celebrating the golden anniversaryof their graduation. Helping welcome them to the half-century clubwere more than 40 members of classes who had already celebrated their50th graduation anniversary, including Victor Laws ’41 and MarvinMandel ’42. Mary Katherine Scheeler ’53, Chair of the LegacyCouncil, addressed the gathering.

JD 200953JD 2009 52

| CAMPAIGN |

Campaign: News Features & StoriesMISSING: COPY & GRAPH INFO

Campaign: News Features & StoriesMISSING: COPY & GRAPH INFO

JD 200955JD 2009 54

Campaign: News Features & StoriesMISSING: COPY & GRAPH INFO

| CAMPAIGN |

$5 MILLION OR MOREHamish & Christine Osborne

$1,000,000 - $4,999,999Anonymous (2)Mr. & Mrs. Paul BekmanHoward S. BrownComcastThe John E. Fetzer Institute, Inc.Henry & Nancy HopkinsWilliam H. Murphy, Jr. &William H. Murphy, III

The Estate of Louis Riehl

$500,000 - $999,999AnonymousCharles Crane FamilyFoundation, Inc.

DLA PiperAlan D. & Brenda Hornstein

$250,000 - $499,999Anonymous (2)Mary Elizabeth Kurz BrightDanoff & King / Legg Law FirmWillard HackermanJoseph R. HardimanMaryland Legal ServicesCorporation

Jaylee Mead & the lateGilbert Mead

Miles & StockbridgeCharles P. Revoile

Stuart M. & Suzanne B. SalsburyVenable LLP

$100,000 - $249,999Anonymous (2)June AuerbachThe Estate of John H. BarrettFrank & Elisabeth BurchKeith Campbell Foundationfor the Environment

W. P. Carey FoundationMarjorie Cook FoundationChristine A. EdwardsJoseph G. Finnerty IIIFrance-Merrick Foundation,Inc.

Fubon Cultural & EducationalFoundation

The Hon. Joel A. HarmatzJudge Ellen M. Heller & ShaleD. Stiller

Edward F. HouffYitai HuThe Macht Philanthropic Fundof The Associated: JewishCommunity Federation ofBaltimore Maryland VolunteerLawyers Service

Joanne & Mark PollakLois & Phillip ProgerJean G. RogersEdward Manno Shumsky &Susan D. Kronick

Taichung City Culture & EducationFoundation

The Hon. Joseph D. TydingsDaniel E. WagnerMr. & Mrs. Arnold Weiner

$50,000 - $99,999Anonymous (2)Associated International, Inc.Beins, Goldberg & GleibermanDonna R. BlausteinJoel D. & Ellen S. FedderEdgar L. & Faith SchreiberFeingold

Miriam Fisher & LawrenceYumkas

Gallagher Evelius & Jones, LLPJohn B. IsbisterLewis & Patricia LeibowitzMcCormick Tribune FoundationM. Jacqueline McCurdyBruce MendelsohnElizabeth K. MoserNetwork 2000Open Society InstituteLeonard A. OrmanMr. & Mrs. Glenn C. Parker, Sr.Gretchen ReddenRifkin, Livingston, Levitan &Silver, LLC

Karen Rothenberg & JeffreySeltzer

Carole & Hanan Sibel

Taiwan Semi Conductor

Manufacturing

$25,000 - $49,999Anonymous

Mr. & Mrs. Edward J. Adkins

Family League of Baltimore City

Black & Decker

Benjamin R. Civiletti

The Estate of Robert Farkas

Morton P. Fisher, Jr.

Friends of Anne Gallagher

Jim and Sabine Hanks

The Estate of Emma Ruth

Hedeman

The Hon. Barbara Kerr Howe

Joseph S. Kaufman

Robert J. Kim

Mr. & Mrs. Raymond LaPlaca

David A. Levin

The Hon. & Mrs. Stanley M. Levy

Ava Lias-Booker & Earl Thomas

Booker, IV

Ober | Kaler

The Hon. Samuel Rosenberg

Mary Katherine & Charles

Scheeler

James L. & Barbara Shea

Michael P. & Lisa Burton

Van Alstine

Roger D. Winston

The Estate of Paul F. Wooden

>>

M A K I N G A N I M PA C T

G I F T S

T H E U N I V E R S I T Y O F M A R Y L A N D S C H O O L O F L AW A N N U A L R E P O R T O F G I V I N G

MA JOR G I F TS TO TH E M A K I N G A N I M PA C T C AMPA IGN

From students providing vital legal services to Baltimore citizens,to faculty shaping state and federallegislation and providing scholarly expertise to governments around the globe, the School of Law isimproving law and society through teaching, scholarship, and public service. To expand these efforts,the law school has embarked upon the ambitious $50 million Making An Impact campaign. TheSchool of Law extends its deepest appreciation to the generous supporters whose major gifts led theCampaign past $28 million this year.

JD 200957JD 2009 56

| CAMPAIGN |

Anonymous (2)David M. AbramsonE. Dale Adkins, IIIMr. & Mrs. Edward J. AdkinsWilliam A. AgeeBonnie E. AllenDenise A. AndrewsJames K. ArchibaldKevin F. ArthurAlison L. AstiJose Bahamonde-GonzalezMr. & Mrs. Paul D. BekmanThe Hon. Robert M. BellDonna R. BlausteinNatalie Blum—Gift inMemory of: David Blum

Jeffrey W. BolotinThe Hon. F. Vernon BoozerJoan G. BorosCharles E. Bradford, Jr.Robert G. Brewer, Jr.The Hon. Josef B. & GloriaG. Brown

Frank & Elisabeth BurchRobert J. CarsonPatrick L. ClancyDawna CobbVaughn ComeauHarriet E. CoopermanMark D. & Judith CoplinLawrence D. CoppelDavid S. CordishRobert B. CurranThe Hon. Andre M. Davis& Jessica Strauss

Natalie R. de MaarMathias J. & Rosetta K.DeVito

William B. DulanyKristine Easley—Gift inMemory of: Ryan H. Easley

Christine A. EdwardsMatthew A. & KathleenA. Egeli

John C. EidlemanGeri EliasThe Hon. John F. Fader, IIKevin P. FayJoel D. & Ellen S. FedderM. Albert FiginskiAndrewW. FinleyJoseph G. Finnerty IIIMitzi FishMorton P. Fisher, Jr.Charles O. & Margaret G.Fisher, Sr.

Miriam L. Fisher & LawrenceJ. Yumkas

Steven D. FrenkilLouis F. FriedmanPhyllis C. FriedmanJohn B. FrischHerbert S. GartenDana A. GausepohlChristopher G. GellnerJonathan M. GennE. Paul GibsonElaine Q. S. GillBarbara S. GontrumJames A. & Ann Clary GordonThe Hon. Kingdon & MaryGould, Jr.

I. Michael GreenbergerWillard HackermanRuthellen HammerJames J. Hanks, Jr.Joseph R. HardimanMark K. & Stephanie R.Harrison

Marta D. HartingCatharine S. Hecht*The Hon. Ellen M. Heller& Shale D. Stiller

Sarah S. HigginsLaura HoenigDiane E. HoffmannMarian L. Hogan

The Hon. Marcella A. HollandLawrence L. Hooper, Jr.Henry & Nancy HopkinsBrenda & Alan HornsteinEdward F. HouffJoseph W. & Virginia A.Hovermill

The Hon. Barbara KerrHowe

Stephen J. ImmeltBrett IngermanJohn B. IsbisterJames S. & Hillary JacobsF. Edward JohnsonPaula M. JunghansElizabeth M. KameenJohn S. KarasJoseph J. KatzJoseph S. KaufmanRobert J. KimGary E. KlausnerMichael J. & Sally KliegmanJohn W. KrausDeborah KravitzHoward K. KurmanTeresa K. LaMasterMr. & Mrs. Raymond G.LaPlaca

Lewis E. & PatriciaLeibowitz

David A. LevinRichard E. LevineRoberta Levy-DodgeThomas B. LewisAva E. Lias-Booker & Earl

Thomas Booker, IVThomas A. LisleEugenia L. LiuAmy MachtLois K. & Phillip MachtRichard J. MarksJamie D. McCourtM. Jacqueline McCurdy

Jaylee M. MeadClarisse B. MechanicBruce S. MendelsohnAbel J. MerrillErin C. MillerPaula A. MonopoliElizabeth K. Moser—Gift in

Memory of: M. Peter MoserThe Hon. William H. Murphy, Jr.William H. Murphy, IIIAllen R. & Ellen P. MyersRobert MyersPaul S. NovakHarold NussenfeldHamish S. & ChristineOsborne

Robert M. Parker, Jr.Doris Patz*Arthur D. Peardon, Jr.Robert V. PercivalLeslie M. PittlerWilliam J. PittlerJoanne & Mark PollakDeborah Lynne PotterPhillip A. & Lois ProgerChristopher J. RanckRichard P. RectorWilliam L. & Theodora H.Reynolds, IIMigsie RichlinLouis M. Riehl*Richard L. & Faith B. RobertsThe Hon. Samuel I.

RosenbergGilbert & Lora A. RosenthalKaren H. Rothenberg &

Jeffrey SeltzerRichard RubinFrederick W. Runge, Jr.The Hon. George L. Russell, Jr.Stuart M. & Suzanne B.

SalsburyH. William Schab, Jr.

In addition tomaking annual giftsat the Maryland Law

School Club levelbetween July 1, 2008and June 30, 2009,

donors listed in boldalso have made amajor gift to the

Making an Impactcampaign as ofJune 30, 2009.

>> MARYL AND L AW SCHOOL CLUB

Members of the Maryland Law School Club are philanthropic leaders committed to sustaining thelaw school’s prestige and influence locally, regionally, nationally and internationally. Every membercontributes annual gifts totaling $1,000 or more, and we are proud to include almost 200 graduatesand friends as members in the club. The School of Law thanks each of those donors not only fortheir loyalty and generosity, but also for the role they play in helping the law school to educate futureleaders and increase access to justice.

1938Major Campaign DonorsJohn H. Barrett*Louis M. Riehl*

Founder’s SocietyLouis M. Riehl*

DonorsRichard H. Love

1941AdvocatesThe Hon. George B.Rasin, Jr.

1945AdvocatesRosanne F. Bernstein

DonorsConstance K. Putzel

1947BarristersCharles O. Fisher, Sr.

DonorsCaroline M. FrenchThe Hon. James GettyClement R. Mercaldo

1948PartnersJohn W. Kraus

DonorsFrances KnopfGeorge W. SullivanThe Hon. CharlesW.Woodward, Jr.

1949CounselorsMartin Z. Vogelhut

AdvocatesPaul D. Lamson, Jr.

DonorsThe Hon. E. MackallChilds

Evan A. ChrissWayne D. RiordanCharles L. & Doris Scott

1950CounselorsFrank Markoe, Jr.

AdvocatesErnest S. CookerlyCharles B. Heyman

DonorsThe Hon. Perry G.Bowen, Jr.

Herbert H. HubbardGeorge NormanAlleck Albert ResnickWilliam C. Rogers, Jr.Norman V. Waltjen Jr.

1951Dean’s CircleHerbert S. Garten

MARYLAND LAWSCHOOL CLUB

Founder’s Society$10,000+

Barristers$5,000-$999,999

Dean’s Circle$2,500-$4,999

Partners$1,000-$2,499

LAW SCHOOL FUND

Counselors$500-$999

Advocates$250-$499

Donors$1-$249

>>All listed graduates

havemade anannual gift to theLaw School Fund

between July 1, 2008and June 30, 2009. In

addition, allgraduates who have

made a gift of$25,000 or more to

theMaking anImpact campaign as

of June 30, 2009are designated asMajor Campagin

Donors.

M A K I N G A N I M PA C T

Neil J. Schechter & MarjorieA. Corwin

Mary Katherine & CharlesScheeler

Mitchell W. ShapiroMatthew ShudtzEdward Manno Shumsky &

Susan D. KronickHanan Y. & Carole SibelSidney SilberJana Singer

John M. Sipple, Jr.Wilbert H. SirotaRobert W. SkeltonMilton R. Smith, Jr.Robert W. Smith, Jr.Gail M. SternWilliam C. Stifler, IIIDavid A. SuperLucia D. SwansonH. Alfred Tarrant, Jr.Adena W. Testa

W. Lee ThomasMary K. Tilghman &Raymond G.Truitt

Stacie E. TobinMichael P. & Lisa BurtonVan Alstine

Katherine L. VaughnsDaniel E. WagnerGeorge R. & Nancy E. WallsMarcus L. WangJudith S. Waranch

Mr. & Mrs. Arnold M. WeinerEarl S. WellschlagerJohn N. Wetzelberger, IIIThomas M. Wilson, IIIWade B. WilsonRoger D. & Karen WinstonJeffrey A. Wyand

GRADUATE S

Our graduates support the School of Law and its sutdents in many ways: from volunteering withstudents to serving on boards and assisting with mentoring and career development. Additionally,our graduates’ generous financial gifts are vital to the law school’s continued success. The Schoolof Law thanks these individuals for their ongoing commitment

JD 200959JD 2009 58

| CAMPAIGN |

GRADUATES CONT I NUED >>

DonorsThomas F. Comber, IIILinwood O. Jarrell, Jr.Jacob Y. MilimanRobert W. Pahr, Jr.Paul R. Schlitz

1952Major Campaign DonorsRobert Farkas*Charles ScheelerPaul F. Wooden*

Founder’s SocietyCharles Scheeler

PartnersMark D. Coplin

AdvocatesJohn C. Weiss, Jr.

DonorsBarry K. BerksonBenjamin R. CadwaladerTheodore C. DenickCarmine J. Granese, Jr.The Hon. Richard B. Latham, Sr.G. Fletcher Ward, Jr.

1953Major Campaign DonorsJoseph S. KaufmanMary Katherine ScheelerThe Hon. Joseph D. Tydings

Founder’s SocietyMary Katherine Scheeler

Dean’s CircleW. Lee Thomas

PartnersWilliam B. DulanyRuthellen HammerJoseph S. Kaufman

CounselorsThe Hon. Joseph D. Tydings

DonorsNorman P. RocklinThe Hon. David RossWilliam T. Russell, Jr.The Hon. Suzanne R. SherwoodGeorge J. Voith

1954PartnersThe Hon. George L. Russell, Jr.

DonorsJohn P. HullJacques E. Leeds, Sr.

Lloyd S. MailmanStanley I. MorsteinEdward E. ObstlerMark A. SingermanHersh SteinLawrence S. Wescott

1955Major Campaign DonorsJune W. AuerbachLeonard A. Orman

CounselorsStanford G. Gann

DonorsJoseph E. Baumgartner, Jr.Irvin L. FishbeinClewell Howell, Jr.Lionell M. LockhartJohn T. McElroyWalter D. Webster

1956Founder’s SocietyLois K. Macht

PartnersMathias J. DeVito

DonorsAbraham L. AdlerJohn A. Hupfer, Jr.Gerald KunesE. Trail MathiasThe Hon. Lawrence F.Rodowsky

1957Major Campaign DonorsArnold M. Weiner

Founder’s SocietyArnold M. Weiner

PartnersAnonymousGilbert Rosenthal

CounselorsFrederick Steinmann

AdvocatesRonald M. Smullian

DonorsLeonard BloomJames M. McDowellCharles Yumkas

1958Major Campaign DonorsJoel D. Fedder

Edgar L. FeingoldThe Hon. Joel A. HarmatzM. Jacqueline McCurdyGlenn C. Parker, Sr.Hanan Sibel

Founder’s SocietyJoel D. FedderM. Jacqueline McCurdyHanan Y. Sibel

CounselorsJack F. BilligJohn H. Ditto, Jr.Edgar L. FeingoldDeHaven L. SmithThe Hon. WilliamW. Wenner

AdvocatesThe Hon. Joel Ansell Harmatz

DonorsMarvin BraveWilliam C. NorwoodGlenn C. Parker, Sr.Lionel M. ShapiroThe Hon. R. Noel Spence

1959PartnersThe Hon. Josef B. BrownWilliam J. Pittler

AdvocatesWilliam M. Levy

DonorsFranklin B. ApplesteinJames F. Caldwell, Ret.Stanton J. Collins, Jr.Stewart DeutschRoy Dragone*Richard E. MarrsWilliam T. Stanley

1960Major Campaign DonorsCharles P. Revoile

PartnersWilliam A. Agee

AdvocatesSolomon ReddickCharles P. Revoile

DonorsR. Frank CollinsL. Rodney ComptonStephen M. EhudinMark EisenbergThe Hon. Thomas I.McKnew, Jr.

Sarah W. PearreThomas D. RanckLouis A. Reinhardt, Jr.Eugene H. SchreiberHarry E. Silverwood, Jr.Sander L. Wise

1961Dean’s CircleRobert J. CarsonWilbert H. SirotaH. Alfred Tarrant, Jr.

CounselorsRonald C. BrubakerThe Hon. Howard S. Chasanow

AdvocatesHerbert J. BelgradCalvin I. Hamburger

DonorsThe Hon. Hilary D. CaplanIrvin N. CaplanRobert G. CarrBernard S. DenickDavid FreishtatYale L. GoldbergThomas E. Harrison, Jr.Howard M. HenesonWilliam G. KolodnerJoel L. LevinWilliam J. McQuayThe Hon. Paul M. RosenbergLouis J. Rosenthal

1962Major Campaign DonorsJoseph R. HardimanJean G. RogersDaniel E. Wagner

Founder’s SocietyJoseph R. Hardiman

PartnersM. Albert FiginskiDaniel E. Wagner

CounselorsLewis A. Noonberg

AdvocatesAlan J. CornblattJames P. LewisHarold MordkofskyDonald NeedleThe Hon. William M. NickersonThe Hon.Thomas J. Waxter, Jr.

DonorsNancy M. AlexanderLawrence R. Bird

Howard M. FriedelWaller S. HairstonJames W. KirkDonald A. KrachJohn H. MichenerJoseph K. PokempnerCyril H. WechtThe Hon. Alan M. Wilner

1963Founder’s SocietyDavid S. Cordish

CounselorsThe Hon. Allen L. Schwait

AdvocatesJohn D. Jarrett*Laurence M. Katz

DonorsThe Hon. Edward J. AngelettiMyles F. FriedmanRaymondW. FullertonFrederick S. HarrisThe Hon. Raymond J. Kane, Jr.Charles S. MullettRaymond C. Rinaldi, Sr.John A. Scaldara

1964PartnersThe Hon. F. Vernon BoozerAbel J. MerrillLeslie M. Pittler

AdvocatesRichard R. Goldberg

DonorsArthur L. BrillPatrick J. B. DonnellyThe Hon. James B. DudleyEugene A. FriedmanHarvey A. HolzmanWesley C. JockischJoseph C. LevinFred S. LondonLouis B. PriceWilliam M. Yoffee

1965PartnersLouis F. FriedmanAdvocatesGerhard H. FuchsJohn W. JansakThe Hon. James P. SalmonWilliam P. Young, Jr.

DonorsA. Robert DavisonFrank L. Dell'Acqua

Sheldon N. DobresMarsha N. CohenPhilip E. EpsteinCharles FreelandAllen B. JacobsonLouis I. KaplanDavid C. PalmerSheldon P. SchumanJames D. StonePaul H. VoreacosWilliam B. Whiteford

1966PartnersThomas A. Lisle

CounselorsNeal D. BordenTheodore B. CornblattRobert E. L. Eaton, Jr.Gordon D. FronkJohn P. Greenspan

AdvocatesDonald J. CrawfordDaniel H. CrowleyThe Hon. Kathleen O'FerrallFriedman

David R. GlickmanGerald M. Richman

DonorsStanley D. AbramsThe Hon. John Carroll ByrnesS. Elliott CohanNancy A. ColemanHerbert GoldmanLawrence M. KlozeMary Alice RichardsonStanley B. RohdStephen A. SchneebergerRobert W. ShookRonald E. StrineJames F. Truitt, Jr.

1967PartnersF. Edward JohnsonMilton R. Smith, Jr.William C. Stifler, III

CounselorsThe Hon. Richard A. CooperStephen C. Winter

AdvocatesRichard O. BerndtWalter R. StoneArthur W. Trump, Jr.

DonorsThe Hon. H. Gary BassWilliam S. Beard

Russell J. BennettMonte FriedAlan N. GamseThomas W. W. HainesRobert Barker Harrison, IIIThe Hon. Barry D. RichmondMelvin L. SchneiderCharles L. Whitham

1968Major Campaign DonorsHenry H. Hopkins

Founder’s SocietyHenry H. Hopkins

PartnersThe Hon. John F. Fader, II

CounselorsHerbert BetterThe Hon. Donald C. DavisMichael A. MeredithThe Hon. James T. Smith, Jr.

AdvocatesGerald H. LeanJoseph E. MooreStephen C. OrensteinRobert R. Winter

DonorsThe Hon. John P. CordermanDennis J. DimseyJohn H. Doud, IIIStanley S. FineW. Thomas FountainKenneth GubinArnold E. JablonArnold JanofskyAaron C. KadishGeorge G. LovelessC. Keith MeiserAlex P. Rasin, III

1969Major Campaign DonorsThe Hon. Barbara Kerr HoweThe Hon. William H. Murphy, Jr.

Founder’s SocietyThe Hon. William H. Murphy, Jr.

BarristersThe Hon. Barbara Kerr Howe

PartnersLawrence D. CoppelJohn C. Eidleman

CounselorsPeter H. Gunst

The Hon. Robert H. MasonBernard G. Peter, Jr.

AdvocatesAaron R. AsraelLeonard M. Linton, Jr.K. Donald Proctor

DonorsPhilip L. Asplen, Jr.John R. BuchleitnerRichard G. ButchokMichael G. ChatzkyThe Hon. John T. Clark, IIIMareen L. Duvall, Jr.John J. Ghingher, IIICarroll R. HebbelJames I. Keenan, Jr.The Hon. Warren J. KrugThe Hon. James L. Mann, Jr.T. Edgie Russell, IIIThomas E. SpathJesse C. Strickland, Jr.Carol S. SugarJudith K. SykesWade P. Thomas, Jr.The Hon. Bright K. WalkerThe Hon. Gerald W.Winegrad

1970Dean’s CircleJeffrey W. Bolotin

PartnersGeorge R. Walls

CounselorsJohn F. Kelly

AdvocatesHarvey J. BergerRobert A. ManziJerald J. OppelThomas J. RennerThe Hon. David K. Rumsey

DonorsMark P. Cohen*Herbert I. DunnThe Hon. Glenn T. Harrell, Jr.Michael D. JackleyA. Stephen KalinskyEllis J. KochWalter E. Laake, Jr.Harold J. LeighRandall M. LutzThe Hon. Floyd L. Parks, Jr.Thomas G. PeterDouglas V. PopeDorothy J. SykesWilkin E. Thomas, Jr.John H. Treadway

JD 200961JD 2009 60

| CAMPAIGN |

GRADUATES CONT I NUED >>

1971Major Campaign DonorsPaul D. BekmanDonna R. BlausteinMary Elizabeth Kurz BrightDavid A. LevinStuart M. Salsbury

Founder’s SocietyPaul D. BekmanDonna R. BlausteinDavid A. LevinStuart M. Salsbury

PartnersE. Dale Adkins, IIIThomas M. Wilson, III

CounselorsPaul S. ChristianStephen N. GoldbergMark H. KolmanCharles R. Moran

AdvocatesJudith A. ArmoldRichard BlochWallace KleidOtho M. Thompson

DonorsWilliam P. BakerA. Gwynn Bowie, Jr.Victor L. CohenGerald W. DibbleAlfred J. DirskaThe Hon. G. EdwardDwyer, Jr.

Allan J. GibberIvar GoldartBrian A. GoldmanThe Hon. Robert H. Heller, Jr.Robert J. MarchickEugene L. Miles, IIIBernard H. MowerSamuel PodbereskyLouis I. RosenHoward C. SiglerLawrence B. Steele, IIIRobert W. WarfieldWilliam I. Weston

1972Major Campaign DonorsEdward J. Adkins

Dean’s CircleEdward J. Adkins

CounselorsJames J. GitomerWayne T. KosmerlJoseph T. Moran, Jr.

AdvocatesJames E. CarbineAnn F. HoffmanSusan P. LevitonThe Hon. W. Milnor Roberts

DonorsBenjamin M. AdlerGary R. AndersonCharles B. FreyRoberta L. GillHoward GofreedCraig M. IngramMarilyn Lowney JohnsonThe Hon. D. Adam KlineAlvin J. KraftAlan H. LegumJean B. MauroWilliam R. RobinsonSanford D. SchreiberAnthony J. Tirone

1973Major Campaign DonorsPhillip A. ProgerSuzanne B. SalsburyEdward Manno Shumsky

Founder’s SocietyPhillip A. ProgerSuzanne B. Salsbury

BarristersEdward Manno Shumsky

Dean’s CircleRobert M. Parker, Jr.John M. Sipple, Jr.

PartnersKevin P. Fay

CounselorsLewis J. BakerDonald L. DeVries, Jr.Robert R. Kern, Jr.

AdvocatesGlenn M. CooperHenry E. Dugan, Jr.Jerald B. LurieThe Hon. Albert J. Matricciani, Jr.The Hon. W. Michel PiersonJames A. SchondebareJ. Thomas Wolfe

DonorsDavid L. AndersonMarc A. AppelKeith W. BellRichard V. BoswellJeffrey D. BreseeThe Hon. William O. Carr

Ward B. Coe, IIIArthur Delano, Jr.Thomas L. FrancyBeverly K. FreelandJames C. GleasonDavid B. IrwinRichard W. KrempaskyThe Hon. M. Kenneth Long, Jr.Edward J. Makowski, Jr.Louis J. MancusoSusan A. NicholsonDavid L. PalmerG. Douglas ReinhardDavid W. SkeenDeborah A. VollmerRobert J. WeinsteinThe Hon. Robert C. WilcoxThe Hon. William L. Witham, Jr.Gordon A. D. Zubrod

1974Major Campaign DonorsFrancis B. Burch, Jr.

Founder’s SocietyFrancis B. Burch, Jr.

Dean’s CircleH. William Schab, Jr.

PartnersRobert B. CurranChristopher G. GellnerGary E. KlausnerChristopher J. RanckFrederick W. Runge, Jr.Robert W. SkeltonJudith S. WaranchJohn N. Wetzelberger, III

CounselorsThe Hon. Lynne A. BattagliaSidney S. FriedmanTimothy J. Hynes, IIIJohn A. PicciottoR. Wayne Sweney

AdvocatesJohn J. Zarych

DonorsDonald S. BaumanJ. Douglas CampbellH. Mark ColvinJonathan EisenbergKirk J. EmgeAlvin M. FeitSteven J. FoxMartin GoozmanJoan GottfriedThe Hon. Ann S. HarringtonPatrick D. MalloyThe Hon. Richard W. Manning

Randall C. MorganRoger J. PedersenPhillip L. PottsPhilip H. SeymourThe Hon. Nancy B. ShugerMax S. StadfeldSteven VanGrackAlan R. WeinsteinBernard J. Williams

1975Major Campaign DonorsLewis E. Leibowitz

Founder’s SocietyLewis E. Leibowitz

Dean’s CircleRichard E. LevineEarl S. Wellschlager

PartnersJames K. ArchibaldHoward K. KurmanRichard Rubin

AdvocatesSalvatore E. Anello, IIIStephen F. FruinGlenn M. GrossmanDeborah F. MauryWilliam M. RichmanMerle Ann SiegelmanEdward Smith, Jr.

DonorsMichael S. BirchAlice C. CherbonnierAnn M. FligstenDale B. GarbuttDouglas R. HartzellGary M. HymanThe Hon. Duncan W. KeirE. Robert Kent, Jr.David M. LyonMichael F. McAllisterRichard J. McCloskeyCharles H. Palmer, IIIMichael S. PearlHenry E. SchwartzThe Hon. Charles A. Stark

1976Major Campaign DonorsJoanne E. Pollak

Founder’s SocietyJoanne E. Pollak

Dean’s CircleRobert G. Brewer, Jr.Natalie R. de Maar

PartnersCharles E. Bradford, Jr.James A. & Ann Clary GordonPaula M. JunghansJohn S. KarasThomas B. Lewis

CounselorsSally B. Gold

AdvocatesJana R. BarnettKathleen E. BarryWesley D. BlakesleeJerome G. GeraghtySaul E. GilsteinThe Hon. ClaytonGreene, Jr.

Mark J. HardcastleGregory K. HareRobin F. KaplanAbram J. KronsbergStephen J. NolanStephen D. TermanLawrence I. Wachtel

DonorsJohn A. AndryszakPamela BaldwinAlan BettenE. Trippe Callahan, Jr.Thomas J. DavisWilliamW. Downes, Jr.Angus R. EvertonDavid M. FleishmanPatrick D. HanleyKenneth A. IsenCharles J. LongWilliam B. MarkerC. Keith McLendonThe Hon. Alfred NanceStuart M. NathanJeffrey D. RossKatherine R. White

1977Major Campaign DonorsThe Hon. Ellen M. HellerEdward F. HouffJohn B. IsbisterBruce S. Mendelsohn

Founder’s SocietyThe Hon. Ellen M. HellerEdward F. HouffJohn B. Isbister

BarristersBruce S. Mendelsohn

Dean’s CircleStephen J. Immelt

Robert W. Smith, Jr.Jeffrey A. Wyand

PartnersSteven D. FrenkilPhyllis C. Friedman

CounselorsRobert R. Bowie, Jr.John D. North

AdvocatesVictoria S. BerghelJohn A. GaughanAndrew G. LevyJoshua E. RaffThe Hon. Martin P.Wasserman

DonorsLee E. BarrettPhilip D. CooperMary R. CraigStephen M. GoldbergRobert W. Hesselbacher, Jr.Franklin W. HuntPhilip S. KauffmanGary M. KellyFlorence A. KesslerThe Hon. Theresa A. LawlerStephen M. LeGendreSherie Brook LibberPatricia A. LoganMichael F. LohrRobert M. McCaigMarna L. McLendonWilliam J. RiinaDavid E. StevensonCharles L. WillisMichael D. WillisW. Paul Zampol

1978Major Campaign DonorsJamie D. McCourt

Founder’s SocietyJamie D. McCourt

BarristersMigsie Richlin

Dean’s CircleHarriet E. CoopermanThe Hon. Andre M. DavisLawrence L. Hooper, Jr.

PartnersDavid M. AbramsonJames S. Jacobs

CounselorsS. Ann Brobst

AdvocatesRaymond D. BurkeGeorge S. LawlerJ. Michael McGuireIlene J. NathanEdward L. SanfordLee A. ShellerPaul W. SpenceIrving E. WalkerSusan L. WhaleyPhillip R. Zuber

DonorsDavid L. BennettWilliam G. ChristoforoNissim DahanMarvin C. GaerCassandra Tsintolas JohnsonJames L. KatzNancy KnisleyVictor H. & Jean S. Laws, IIIJonathan D. LibberJames D. NeilsonAlvin M. SandlerRobert E. ScherRonald E. ShapiroGeorge H. SpanglerDavid J. StanderTodd E. StevensonLouis P. Willemin

1980PartnersJoan G. Boros

CounselorsSean C. ConnorsJulie E. LandauW. Charles Rogers, IIIJonathan D. SmithW. Robert Zinkham

AdvocatesJohn L. Clark, Jr.Carol S. CraigEdward J. GillissFranklin M. LeeThomas J. MulreninSteven R. SmithRosetta Kerr Wilson

DonorsAlan A. AbramowitzDouglas J. AntonioMeri Arnett-KremianDan A. BlakingerLinda BourquinRobert M. ErcoleSandra F. HainesHarriet J. HalperThe Hon. Edward R. K.Hargadon

Timothy W. JosiahDavid P. KennedyJohn L. KopolowJonathan R. KrasnoffBarbara F. LoughmanPatricia Lyman McLeanJeffrey H. MyersElizabeth M. PendletonTimmy F. RuppersbergerThe Hon. Jillyn K. SchulzeCatherine M. ShultzJohn M. Smallwood

1981PartnersDenise A. AndrewsMarjorie A. CorwinNeil J. SchechterMitchell W. ShapiroAdena W. Testa

CounselorsThe Hon. Nathan BravermanAndrew D. LevyLynn B. Sassin

AdvocatesJack L. B. GohnDaniel J. MellinThe Hon. Marc H. NachmanMarie H. RazulisThe Hon. Melanie M. Shaw Geter

DonorsSherry B. BerlinGuy J. BinghamPatricia A. Cole-SmithEugene W. Cunningham, Jr.Diane J. CurranLouis Brendan CurranAndrew H. DerangerThe Hon. Deborah S. EylerDenise H. FederJeanette P. FitzpatrickDavid S. HolzerSarah R. KaplanMark D. McCurdyJohn H. MitnickG. Macy NelsonHoward P. NicholsonPatricia F. O’ConnorKay B. PartridgeTyrone D. PressSherry L. RhodesBarry K. SalisburyLeah J. SeatonPaul D. SheltonRomaine N. Williams

1982PartnersJonathan M. Genn

JD 200963JD 2009 62

| CAMPAIGN |

GRADUATES CONT I NUED >>

AdvocatesThe Hon. Alice P. ClarkJames E. Edwards, Jr.David H. GambleConstance A. JunghansJohn R. Rutledge

DonorsWilliam R. BaileyBrian C. DentonMary Alane DownsT. Patrick DulanyMeryl L. K. EddyMillicent D. Edwards-Gordon

Patricia L. GatlingJulie D. GoodwinWilliam K. HammondRichard W. HarrisLouis G. Hutt, Jr.Robert E. JacobsonRobin S. KennedyMary M. KramerAnn MacNeilleWilliamW. McAllister, Jr.M. Theresa McDonoughJerold A. MosesJames E. Oltman, Jr.David M. PorterGerald K. RayRobert S. ShreveHenry A. Smith, IIIKenneth F. Spence, IIINancy S. SpritzBetty A. StemleyRichard B. SternCatherine A. StevensPamela Mallas SulewskiCarol L. SwanSteven G. TylerJ. H. Wannamaker, IIIHoward D. Wilson, Jr.The Hon. Stanley C.Wisnewski

Joyce L. WrightPhyllis J. Ringler

1983Major Campaign DonorsRhonda Pindell CharlesChristine A. EdwardsRobert J. KimRaymond G. LaPlaca

Founder’s SocietyChristine A. Edwards

BarristersRobert J. KimRaymond G. LaPlaca

Dean’s CircleAndrewW. Finley

PartnersJohn B. FrischSarah S. HigginsElizabeth M. Kameen

CounselorsRichard J. Kypta

AdvocatesThe Hon. Kathleen M. DumaisE. Philip Franke, IIIRobert T. FranklinRuth A. LusbyDoris M. MerrickRoann NicholsThe Hon. Mary Louise Preis

DonorsJohn J. AndreAndrew H. BaidaRobert Birdsong, Jr.The Hon. WilliamL. Boulden

William E. CarlsonEllis H. Davison, IIAmy L. EpsteinJames M. FensterwaldCarolyn E. FrazierHedy H. GordonThomas H. HallerCarole B. HamlinBrian P. HochheimerCraig J. & Karen S. HornigDouglas R. IrmingerThe Hon. Michele Dane &Richard L. Jaklitsch

Michael S. KarasBonnie A. KirklandMichele E. LoewenthalPatricia L. MaggioJohn T. Maguire, IIJohn F. Morkan, IIISheryl J. NegronElizabeth G. OstermanMary E. PeitersenBeth PepperAnn Reinsel PowellD. Lee RutlandLisa P. SnyderJeffrey TurkelLeslie Smith TurnerBarry WeiskopfPatrick E. White

1984PartnersPaul S. NovakHarold NussenfeldLucia D. Swanson

CounselorsBarry C. GreenbergDaniel J. Ryan

AdvocatesAbe A. BaileyThe Hon. Mary Ellen BarberaDebora L. ClovisDavid R. Durfee, Jr.

DonorsMichael P. BellWayne A. BrooksDebbie S. BuchwaldGregory R. CarusoThomas B. ConwayMartha S. CukorMichael D. DobbsMark A. GasparChristine E. KeaneSuzanne M. KourlesisDiane M. MaloneyPatrick G. MartinezKevin J. MillerBarbara J. PalmerJames D. PetersonMartine B. ReedRobert A. ShawverGlenn D. SolomonPriscilla Wilson-Milton

1985Major Campaign DonorsMiriam L. Fisher

Founder’s SocietyMiriam L. Fisher

CounselorsMark P. KeenerDonald S. MeringerSteven J. Sibel

AdvocatesGail G. CooperStephen T. GallowayThe Hon. Susan M. MarzettaMichael W. SkojecGina M. ZawitoskiVirginia A. Zrake

DonorsBetty Cockrill BannatRobert R. Brannan, Jr.Joanne Saunders BrooksDavid S. CadeSean L. ColemanYvette N. DiamondGregory M. DoudnikoffDaphne D. DuverneyAmy Glatter GoodmanJeffrey J. HinesPeter J. HuangJay L. JensenMichael F. Le MireDonna M. SchaefferChristine Barilla Nell

Michael G. OttenDonna M. RaffaeleAlice S. RitchieJohn J. SchneiderNatalie A. ShieldsCynthia L. SpellBarbara A. Welsh

1986Major Campaign DonorsAva E. Lias-BookerHamish S. Osborne

Founder’s SocietyHamish S. Osborne

BarristersAva E. Lias-Booker

CounselorsMary Helen McNealDan R. SkowronskiBrenda J. Wilson

AdvocatesJane A. CanterMichael HimesJennifer A. Smith

DonorsSteven J. BanksN. K. Deshler GouldRaymond A. HeinDean KasianEileen M. LungaCara J. LutherMatthew J. SeidenWilliam A. Sherman, IIKatherine L. TaylorAndrea R. S. WatkinsKenneth M. WilliamsPeter A. Woolson

1987Major Campaign DonorsJoseph G. Finnerty III

Founder’s SocietyJoseph G. Finnerty III

Dean’s CircleRichard P. Rector

PartnersKevin F. ArthurPatrick L. ClancyMark K. Harrison

CounselorsPatricia D. Granados

AdvocatesRochelle B. FowlerF. Philip Manns, Jr.

DonorsJanet K. ColemanJohn R. DevineMargaret M. DoaneSuzanne K. FaraceNadine G. FelixEthel B. HillMargaret S. JacksSharon S. Krevor-Weisbaum

Linda S. LebowitzDorothy J. LennigMichael A. LevinJean W. OglethorpeSuellen S. PolandValerie I. ShealerJonathan P. StebenneRobert SteinheimerThe Hon. Rodney C.Warren

Theresa I. Zolet

1988Major Campaign DonorsLawrence J. Yumkas

Founder’s SocietyLawrence J. Yumkas

PartnersMatthew A. EgeliStephanie R. HarrisonFaith B. RobertsRichard L. Roberts

CounselorsDarrell N. Braman, Jr.Jeffrey P. Weiss

AdvocatesAlemayehu G. MariamDavid M. MartinBonnie S. Gullatt SchneiderRachel A. Wohl

DonorsDavid A. BakerMary C. BaldwinLaura B. BlackKathryn Webb BradleyStephanie L. ChaharbaghiDanielle M. CruttendenCindy R. DiamondKaren J. ElliottJudith C. EnsorF. Gillis GreenRobert B. HopkinsCharlton T. Howard, IIISusan B. McTigheAnthony L. MeagherSheila Sullivan NewsomJane F. Polcen

Christopher M. RolleMaureen L. RowlandMary Ann RyanVilma L. SanchezLeigh Swann-HalstadJonathan P. Van Hoven

1989PartnersMarta D. Harting

CounselorsVicki A. Margolis

AdvocatesElizabeth A. Cooper BlockKaren M. CrabtreeRichard B. HillRoseanne M. Matricciani

DonorsDebra Scurnick BlockChristopher CookMary Malloy DimaioLeslie E. Goldsborough, IIIYvonne B. HerndonLauren D. JonesThomas E. KaneBrian M. ReimerTimothy U. & Lori R.Sharpe

Henry TalaveraVictor K. TervalaJoseph B. TetraultThe Hon. Halee F.Weinstein

1990PartnersDeborah Lynne PotterDavid A. Super

CounselorsMichele Levy CohenKenneth R. MorrowMelissa L. PeppeMatthew S. Sturtz

AdvocatesElizabeth S. DonleyMarylee HannanEva H. Hill

DonorsSteven F. BarleySteven M. BergerJohn H. Carter, IIISusan S. ChangThomas C. Dame &Denise M. Duval

Joseph B. EspoTimothy M. Gunning

Ronald S. HonbergAnna S. LeeAnn B. LloydMargherita LuzziCinda A. MassudaRuth F. RileyBeverly B. SalmonJill R. SeidmanRichard B. StofbergMarilyn AnnWennesLisa B. WilliamsThomas N. Yeager

1991Major Campaign DonorsGilbert D. Mead*

PartnersDeborah Kravitz

CounselorsAnn S. HobbsDonna P. Sturtz

AdvocatesErin M. Fitzsimmons

DonorsGale C. BonannoJanet L. CallisMatthew B. CooperPatricia Gillis CousinsCarol Lee FoglerJeanne M. FranklinColleen K. HeitkampDavid H. Hollander, Jr.Douglas B. HudsonLynn A. KohenPatricia L. KoneckeKyriakos P. MarudasThe Hon. Sherae M.McNeal

Frank J. O'DonnellNayna D. PhilipsenJeffrey S. RayJonathan F. SaxtonEric B. SchwartzClaire S. SheaJohn V. SherwinWalter E. WilsonGeorge A. Zachariah

1992Dean’s CircleStacie E. Tobin

PartnersMarian L. HoganVirginia A. Hovermill

AdvocatesKenneth B. AbelF. Robert Hunter III

Maureen J. SanelliMartin H. Schreiber II

DonorsKathleen F. CostelloKathleen Hoke DachilleChristina B. FaassKelly Hughes IversonCindy L. JohnsonRobin Frazier KandelKeith E. KolodgieMark A. NealBradley C. PlovanLawrence R. SeidmanEmily J. VaiasAndrew G. Zehner

1993PartnersJoseph W. HovermillRichard J. Marks

CounselorsWilburn L. Chesser

AdvocatesJonathan P. KaganSarah A. LeonhardJohn F. LessnerScott A. NelsonMark T. PowellMary S. Raivel

DonorsAndrew D. AuerbachRuben G. BallesterosDina Kargon BillianHarvey D. BlackerStephen M. BloorLeonard F. FeldmanAndrew A. GerberKamil IsmailKarin M. KrchnakDiane K. Mobley-CanovaMelisa M. C. MoonanStephen M. PincusLaurence A. RuthJoyce H. StanleyKenneth TalleyJohn P. VeschiKristin A. Young

1994Major Campaign DonorsYitai Hu

PartnersBrett Ingerman

DonorsLori L. BruunTimothy J. BurchCarrie H. Corcoran

JD 200965JD 2009 64

| CAMPAIGN |

GRADUATES CONT I NUED >>

Vincent DalyTimothy Karam DoleDaniel FriedmanJeffrey A. FriedmanJeanne M. GrassoWilliam S. HeymanCharles M. Hogg, Jr.Lynn DymondHutchinson

Elizabeth C. LovoyShannon M. MillerKara M. MorgensternChristopher I. MoylanLauri McEntire MoylanJonathan D. NewmanJames S. PezzullaEvelyn D. Pisegna-Cook

Daniel W. PughRobyn L. ReyesBryan RoslundRebecca A. WeaverChadW. WeddleMeg B. Whiteford

1995PartnersTeresa K. LaMaster

CounselorsAndrea Molette BrownDavid M. Lynn

AdvocatesChristopher R. Dollase

DonorsRodolphe N. BriochePaul S. CaiolaMegan D. DortenzoMarion K. GoldbergDavid W. HotesSiobhan R. KeenanRita KhannaSuvita MelehyKaren K. PasciutoM. Christine Sinelli-Lamos

1996CounselorsKenneth S. Aneckstein

AdvocatesMatthew G. & Lara L.Hjortsberg

Douglas A. Levy

DonorsJocelyn C. AdkinsMaura L. DeMouy & KevinM. Robertson

Matthew P. FitzpatrickTacey J. Himelfarb

Dinah S. LeventhalVicki L. LyonsElizabeth A. MilitoDavid E. SingerSusan M. SpeerFrederick S. Vondy

1997CounselorsF. Patrick Ostronic

AdvocatesCarrie Anne BlandJennifer L. Lewis

DonorsRonald E. Council, Jr.Erik J. LichterBrian M. PerlbergJudith Horowitz RichterClaudia J. Zuckerman

1998AdvocatesTherese M. Goldsmith

DonorsLynette P. AdamsKirsten Andrews WoelperSherri L. BooyeMelody A. BrukiewaHeather Doherty ClarkRenee M. FrankHillorie S. Morrison

1999PartnersEugenia L. Liu

CounselorsWilliam & Rebecca G. Piermattei

AdvocatesHenryka W. G. CraigBrian R. Cyr & Lila G. Shapiro-CyrKelly N. Reeves

DonorsMarcia E. AndersonSteven P. ArnheimApple ChapmanMichael DavidPhilip F. DiamondKimberle E. DoddGregg J. FernandesThomas P. FortJennifer Clarkson HalperJoseph F. KeyNicole M. Lacoste-BowlesAnne S. LangleyColleen M. MallonMary R. MartaMary E. O’Byrne

Cynthia Blake SandersPeter J. StackpoleKenneth Y. TurnbullPaul R. Versace

2000CounselorsDenis C. Mitchell

AdvocatesJennifer L MarshallJoshua Udler—Gift inMemory of: StanleyS. Herr

Patricia M. Zweibel

DonorsAimee M. AcetoJohn M. BirdChristopher B. EdwardsBecky B. FitzsimmonsJoanna Boettinger GogerGwen R. GroganMichael J. LewisMark L. MatulefChristina E. McDonaldNicholas M. MurphyDawn P. LanzalottiO’Croinin

Louis Patalano, IVMelanie ShepherdsonLeslie H. SpiegelEinar StoleCynthia L Tippett

2001Dean’s CircleDana A. Gausepohl

PartnersArthur D. Peardon, Jr.Wade B. Wilson

DonorsOrlando D. BarnesJames R. Benjamin, Jr.The Hon. Jon S. CardinSara R. Cohen FidlerKhalilah Nugent HarrisTerry J. HarrisJeremy A. HaughJane M. HauserMary Ellen R. HimesGregory A. HopeSuzanne N. HulthageCharles F. LittletonLuke C. McLarenRod M. MoskowitzLaura A. PiersonScheinberg

Jennifer M. SchwartzottMichael F. Strande

2002CounselorsJuan M. Ocasio-ColonBrett D. Rogers

AdvocatesMichael L. BouyeaTracy D. Kulikowski

DonorsShara L. BoonshaftAndrew C. BroughtRobert A. CageKathryn M. ChristensenMargaret H. CluneCarol Ghinger CooperKelly M. FitzpatrickRonald S. McBrideAndrew T. NicholsLuciene M. ParsleyJoanna Fong Yeh

2003AdvocatesLaura A. SkowronskiBouyea

Megan K. MechakHeather L. Spurrier

DonorsJacqueline G. BaddersJeffrey A. BarmachStephanie Kaye BaronTracee Orlove FrumanShraga B. GoldenhershEric A. HaleWilliam C. Hollis IIIShana E. JonesJon E. KallenDismas N. LocariaRobert M. LohmanMatthew A. MaciarelloMeghan E. MaloneyKaryn B. MarshTimothy M. MayfieldJulie A. MeawadEllen RothschildRebecca L. SnyderTracy L. SteedmanEden O. TerenziniHolly J. Winter

2004CounselorsPaul A. Solomon

AdvocatesBarbara E. Larson

DonorsGary M. AlmeterKatherine E. Baer

Emily E. BaineRenita L. CollinsRyan R. DietrichEdward S. Digges, IIIGregory D. GalliArielle A. Harry-BessDanielle E. HowarthYelee Y. KimLeigh M. MaddoxAnna Almon MahaneyRyane M. NecessaryConor B. O’CroininKelly E. PfeiferAmanda S. PitcherJennifer R. PorterAlison H. ProstYolanda J. PruittKimberly A. RoemerThomas H. RomanMargaret WalshRudmann

Paul L. SorisioTimothy G. Woodhouse

2005DonorsMatthew R. AlsipLawrence J. BullardCristina E. DuganNathan Gardner-AndrewsUlka P. GhantaSorella U. JacobsCortney L. MadeaGregory S. McDonaldAnn C. MorrillCharles M. OlmstedSharon M. PusinDarlene A. Skinner

2006PartnersVaughn ComeauMatthew Shudtz

CounselorsMarshall J. Klein

AdvocatesAbigail N. BortnickEdward P. Parent

DonorsChristopher S. AwadMelissa BaumMegan Rector BergerTimothy F. BergerDavid Robert BlazinaLaura K. BooneJames T. CarrollKristen L. DorseyAlexandra N. Freemire

Martha G. GouelMichael C. HeyseVeronica R. JenningsIyanrick W. JohnRommel B. LoriaSteven G. MetzgerKatherine M. RossiIndira K. SharmaAndrea L. Silvia

2007AdvocatesAdebowale O. AyeniJames A. GoodwinChristopher S. HackJoanne S. HawanaFrances E. HuberDaniel W. IngersollEvan M. IsaacsonAndrew S. KatzenbergAmy F. LermanEmily L. LevensonVictor E. LevisteJill R. MarenbergCara L. McConvilleMargalit MocheRhonda S. NeuhausScott J. RichmanMargaret Lynch SelwoodReena K. ShahElisabeth S. WaldenAllison B. WettlauferJessica M. WibleAlicia L. WilsonAileen B. Xenakis

2008Dean’s CircleMarcus L. Wang

PartnersElaine Q. S. GillErin C. Miller

AdvocatesCarrie A. RollJaimin B. ShahEllen E. SmithThaila K. Sundaresan

DonorsGwendolyn M. AllenEmilie C. AracilDanielle C. BeasleySylvia A. Berry-LewisJonathan H. BlileyChristine Jochim BooteJessica B. BostonJack B. BoydJustin S. BrennerJustin A. BrowneRebecca L. Caldwell

Jonathan ChengJodie L. ChilsonColleen ClaryChervonne E. ColonAnne M. DeadyCarrie A. DurhamGregory S. EmrickPatrick W. FlavinThomas M. GraceJeffrey S. GreenbergPuja GuptaAshley E. HofmeisterCarla L. JupiterJeremiah J. KellyLiraz KolnikNazo L. KoulloukianJonathan M. KucskarAnna R. KupersteinJeanne C. LynchAna M. ManraraMarc G. MarieMelissa O. MartinezDavid B. MislerKelly T. MooreJeane T. NitschThomas K. PrevasJennifer D. RasmussenCaroline A. RiedlingerJessica E. SanetNina H. SchichorJoshua E. SchultzCori M. ShepherdRaymond K. ShinJohn T. StinsonLewis J. TaylorKathryn E. TitfordAlicia H. WelchKedrick N. Whitmore

2009(Includes gifts and 5-yearpledges to the class gift orleadership scholars project)

DonorsBernie AnnorJebby ArnoldGaddiel BaahRebecca BadenMonique BairOsafo BarkerNatalie BaughmanVeronica BerruzHal BlattDana C. Hayden BinghamElizabeth CappielloMaria ChavezAndrew ChiangThemis ChryssostomidesRobert ClemonsStacey ColeKerry CoopermanEdwin Cortes

Lindsey DastrupMark DeboyShannon DeckerJennifer DickmanChristine DugganLisa ElderGeorge EverlySuzanne L. FerreroScott FithenJoan FlahertyLauren GeisserDanielle Marie GiffordJoseph GithukuMaryellen GleesonSandra GoldbergAlexander GormleyElizabeth GreenLauren GrossmanLeslie HarrelsonAmy HennenRebecca HerrCandace HolmesKatrin HussmannJessica IturriagaRobin JacobsDanfeng KoonTalley KovacsLaura KowalGeoff KravitzAdam LernerKatherine LindoJennifer LiuJulia LloydRobert MaddoxKevin MattinglyPuja P. MehtaMichael A. MillerEdward E. MoawadMario MonopolisCarl Lewis MooreDavid MyersSarah Novak NesbittLydia NussbaumValerie NussenblattMiguel PalmeiroRyan PalmerRene ParksUyen PhamPatrick PhelanErin PodolnyNicholas ProyHeather PrugerKara RademacherEdward ReillyBrian RobinsonElizabeth M. RyanErin SagranskyBryan SaxtonMira ScharfTeresa SchellRebecca SchmitzMatthew Schroll

JD 200967JD 2009 66

| CAMPAIGN |

Advocacy FundE. Dale Adkins, IIIDavid B. AllenScott Allen, Sr.Duane & Donna ArbogastJames K. ArchibaldMr. & Mrs. Paul D. BekmanSamuel BillupsAbigail N. BortnickThe Hon. William L. BouldenChristine M. BowmanJames F. BrungoJane A. CanterThe Hon. William O. CarrThe Hon. James P. Casey & EvelynOmega CannonThe Hon. E. Mackall ChildsCarol Ghinger CooperGlenn M. CooperThe Hon. John P. Corderman

Ronald E. Council, Jr.James J. DebeliusDonald L. DeVries, Jr.Dugan Babij Tolley & Spector, LLCHenry E. Dugan, Jr.M. Albert FiginskiGeorge E. FlemingKeith S. FranzDale B. GarbuttHerbert S. GartenDana A. GausepohlJames J. GitomerThe Hon. Edward R. K. HargadonThe Hon. Glenn T. Harrell, Jr.Michael L. HaslupLynn Dymond HutchinsonWilliam J. Kobokovich, Jr.Kramon & Graham, P.A.Keith B. KrissoffThe Hon. Warren J. Krug

Walter E. Laake, Jr.David A. LevinRonald MarryottThe Hon. Sherae M. McNealThe Hon. Daniel W. MoylanDouglas F. MurrayThe Hon. Alfred NanceNational Institute for TrialAdvocacy

The Hon. William M. NickersonBarbara J. PalmerThe Hon. Floyd L. Parks, Jr.Sharon M. PusinScott J. RichmanAlice S. RitchieThe Hon. W. Milnor RobertsChristopher M. RolleRosenberg Martin Greenberg, LLPThe Hon. Paul M. RosenbergThe Hon. Allen L. Schwait

Howard C. SiglerSkadden, Arps, Slate,Meagher & Flom LLP

Patrick C. SmithPaul A. SolomonTydings & Rosenberg, LLPMarcus L. WangThe Hon. Halee F. WeinsteinThe Hon. WilliamW. WennerWilliam B. WhitefordThe Hon. Alan M. WilnerAlicia L. WilsonThe Hon. Charles W.Woodward, Jr.

Peter A. Woolson

Byron & Max L. Berman StudentFellowship FundBlair BermanFrances T. Brown

In addition tomaking a gift to anendowed and/or

named fundbetween July 1, 2008and June 30, 2009,

donors listed in boldalso have made amajor gift to the

Making an Impactcampaign as ofJune 30, 2009.

>> ENDOWED AND NAMED FUNDS

Endowments are a way to combine a donor’s vision with the needs of the School of Law, and a strongendowment reduces the law school’s dependence on tuition revenues. Typically, a portion of incomegenerated by each endowment is spent every year, with any excess earnings reinvested to grow theendowment and compensate for inflation.

ENDOWED AND NAMED FUNDS CONT I NUED >>

Robert & Heather Zavod—Gift inMemory of: Byron Berman

Donna R. Blaustein &Natalie R. de MaarScholarship Endowment

Donna R. BlausteinNatalie R. de Maar

John Brumbaugh MemorialFund

Alice A. BrumbaughDavid B. GrahekRobert I. KellerPaula A. MonopoliPeter E. QuintKatherine L. Vaughns

Campbell Foundation-Environmental Law ClinicEnforcement Project

Keith Campbell Foundation forthe Environment Inc.

Benjamin R. CivilettiScholarship Fund

The Hon. Benjamin R. CivilettiPatrick L. ClancyWillard HackermanLaura HoenigLaura & Ronald H. HoenigFoundation

Vicki A. MargolisThe Whiting-Turner ContractingCompany

Class of 2008 FundGwendolyn M. AllenEmilie C. AracilDanielle C. BeasleySylvia A. Berry-LewisJonathan H. BlileyJack B. BoydJustin S. BrennerJustin A. BrowneRebecca L. CaldwellJodie L. ChilsonColleen ClaryChervonne E. ColonCarrie A. DurhamGregory S. EmrickPatrick W. FlavinErik Fulwider & Nicole ForelThomas M. GraceJeffrey S. GreenbergPuja GuptaAshley E. HofmeisterJohn B. IsbisterCarla L. JupiterJeremiah J. KellyLiraz KolnikNazo L. Koulloukian

Jonathan M. KucskarAnna R. KupersteinJeanne C. LynchMarc G. MarieMelissa O. MartinezErin C. MillerDavid B. MislerJeane T. NitschThomas K. PrevasJennifer D. RasmussenCaroline A. RiedlingerCarrie A. RollJessica E. SanetNina H. SchichorJoshua E. SchultzJaimin B. ShahCori M. ShepherdRaymond K. ShinEllen E. SmithJohn T. StinsonThaila K. SundaresanLewis J. TaylorKathryn E. TitfordAlicia H. WelchAlleen Yu

Clinical Law FundAimee M. AcetoAlvaro J. Bellido de LunaBrenda Bratton BlomLaura K. BooneMichael L. & Laura A.Skowronski Bouyea

Andrew J. ChiangDeutsche Bank AmericasFoundation

Nathan Gardner-AndrewsPatricia D. GranadosMarylee HannanJane M. HauserMichael C. HeyseBonnie A. KirklandDeborah KravitzBarbara E. LarsonSusan P. LevitonDismas N. LocariaElizabeth C. LovoyRuth A. LusbyCara J. LutherMegan K. MechakMiller & Brasington, P.L.Shannon M. MillerMelisa M. C. MoonanSheryl J. NegronChristine Barilla NellEvelyn D. Pisegna-CookBrett D. RogersBryan RoslundMaureen L. RowlandLeah J. SeatonThe Hon. Nancy B. Shuger& H. Mark Colvin

Jennifer A. SmithJenny L. SmithThomas E. SpathAdrienne Williams-ConoverRoger C. Wolf

Paul Cordish MemorialWriting Fund

David S. CordishPaul Cordish Memorial Fund

Charles Crane Family FoundationConflict Resolution EducationProgram

Charles Crane FamilyFoundation, Inc.

DLA Piper Scholarship FundKenneth S. AnecksteinFrank & Elisabeth BurchDLA PiperJoseph G. Finnerty IIIMarta D. HartingBrett IngermanRichard E. LevineRichard J. MarksPaul S. NovakRichard P. RectorJonathan D. SmithRobert W. Smith, Jr.Stacie E. TobinEarl S. WellschlagerGina M. Zawitoski

Robert E. L. Eaton and SueT. Eaton Library Resource Fund

Robert E. L. Eaton, Jr.

Christine A. Edwards ScholarshipFund

Christine A. Edwards

Catherine S. Edwards MemorialScholarship Fund

Kimberly A. Donaldson—Giftin Memory of: Chrystal T.Edwards

Business Law Program FundWilbert H. Sirota

Environmental Defense FundJocelyn C. AdkinsLori L. BruunRichard G. ButchokRobert J. CarsonJonathan ChengThomas B. ConwayErin M. FitzsimmonsRenee M. FrankRuthellen HammerAnn S. Hobbs

Daniel W. IngersollTimothy W. JosiahJon E. KallenCharles F. LittletonMark L. MatulefElizabeth A. MilitoRobert V. PercivalPaul L. SorisioR. Wayne SweneyLewis J. Taylor

Special Gifts to the Laura MrozekPublic Interest Grant in honorof her retirement:

Carrie Anne BlandAndrew C. BroughtRobert A. CageSusan S. ChangApple Chapman & PaulR. Versace

Margaret H. ClunePhilip F. DiamondSara R. Cohen FidlerKimberle E. DoddElizabeth S. DonleyUlka P. GhantaJoanna Boettinger GogerJames A. GoodwinJeanne M. GrassoTerry J. HarrisGregory A. HopeEvan M. IsaacsonShana E. JonesKarin M. KrchnakTracy D. KulikowskiJennifer L. LewisCortney L. MadeaKaryn B. MarshJennifer L MarshallLaura V. MrozekRyane M. NecessaryF. Patrick OstronicBrian M. PerlbergKelly E. PfeiferWilliam & RebeccaPiermattei

Alison H. ProstMary S. RaivelJennifer M. SchwartzottMelanie ShepherdsonMatthew ShudtzAndrea L. SilviaSusan M. SpeerMichael F. StrandeCynthia L TippettJohn C. Weiss, Jr.Wade B. Wilson

John F. Fader, II ScholarshipEndowment Fund

Danoff & KingThe Hon. John F. Fader, II

M A K I N G A N I M PA C T

Vanessa SchultzAmanda SchwartzkopfJonathan ScruggsJoseph SelbaOctavia ShulmanClayton SolomonXochitl S. StrohbehnCaleisha StuckeyKarlyn SweetmanMelissa ThompsonAnne TinocoJessica TrinhDanielle TurnipseedAdriana VerleysenChris VillatorRadiance WaltersTeva WeissmanRhona Williams

2010(Current students)DonorsMichelle D. AlbertAnne P. BlackfieldChristine M. BowmanM. Jason BrookeJustin C. CallawayCaroline L. FarrellAnthony M. GallegosDuty D. GreeneBenjamin H. HuhJessica L. A. MarksKeith A. ShebairoAlexis P. SlaterJoanne E. SpilichHeather A. TalleyMaximilian L. Tondro

2011(Current students)DonorsKarinna M. ArroyoMarita O. AyodeleAmy B. CaiazzaDaniella CasseresKathryn L. D'AdamoHelen M. DalphonseAlexander C. HugginsEmily C. JaskotHelena C. MastrogianisJennifer McManusAlexandra E. MillardTheresa C. MorseApril M. MortonJasmin A. NunezDavid Pantzer

Matthew L. PetersEdward J. ReillyAlison M. RosholtShauna L. StringhamJavier TiradoJames F. Van Der SchalieGeorge R. WaddingtonPerry N. Wasserman

2012(Current students)DonorsAdam D. BlockAndrea N. Johnson

JD 2009 68 JD 200969

| CAMPAIGN |

ENDOWED AND NAMED FUNDS CONT I NUED >>

David B. GrahekWilliam L. & Theodora H.Reynolds, IILipmon C. Woon

Fedder Environment Fund for theSchool of Law

Joel D. & Ellen S. Fedder—Giftin Honor of: Herbert S. Garten

Robert G. & Amy F. Pollokoff

Marc Feldman Memorial FundTaunya L. BanksDouglas L. ColbertDavid B. GrahekRobert I. KellerPeter E. QuintKatherine L. Vaughns

John E. Fetzer Institute, Inc. Law,Leadership and ProfessionalismInitiative

The John E. Fetzer Institute, Inc.

Charles O. Fisher ScholarshipFund

Charles O. & Margaret G.Fisher, Sr.—Gift in Honor of:Miriam L. Fisher & LawrenceJ. Yumkas

Miriam L. Fisher & LawrenceJ. Yumkas

Charles & Gail B. Yumkas—Giftin Honor of: Charles O. &Margaret G. Fisher, Sr.

Miriam L. Fisher & LawrenceJ. Yumkas

Forensic Scholarship FundCenter for Forensic EconomicStudies

Ronald P. Fish Memorial FundR. Kelvin AntillJoseph J. BellingerPaul K. & Kathleen CaseyRobert B. CurranSophie M. DagenaisA. Robert Davison & Paula KatzEugene A. DiprinzioGeri EliasPhilip G. EnsticeJay A. EpstienRobert M. & Maureen M. ErcoleStuart & Ellen H. FineVicki FinkelsteinMonte & Eileen FriedRoger K. & Harriet H. GarfinkDavid Good & Lori A. NicolleMrs. Marci I. GordonThe Hon. Kingdon & MaryGould, Jr.

Barry C. Greenberg & BrendaWilson

Peter H. & Ulrike GunstArdyth L. HallRichard J. & Margaret C.Himelfarb

Charles S. HirschJacqueline L. HirshTheodore W. HirshPhilip M. HorowitzJames F. Knott Realty GroupNicole M. Lacoste-BowlesLipman, Frizzell & MitchellSylvia T. MarcusTimothy F. McCormackRonald D. & Carol C. MettamNorman E. Parker, Jr.Benton PumpianRussell R. Reno, Jr.J. Paul RiegerJohn H. & Susan Obrecht Riehl, IVRichard RubinLawrence R. & Jill R. SeidmanBrian R. Cyr & Lila G. Shapiro-CyrKevin L. ShepherdSher, Garner, Cahill, Richter, Klein& Hilbert, L.L.C.Sherwood Partners LLCAlexander & Patricia ShortShulman Rogers Gandal Pordy& Ecker PA

Sidney SilberMichael W. SkojecMary K. Tilghman & RaymondG. Truitt

Judith TortoraCharles & Mary Jo WagandtJudith S. WaranchS. Nelson & Barbara K. WeeksDorrit F. WestheimerWexford Science andTechnology, LLC

Kelly M. Wrenn

France-Merrick Foundation Fundfor Linking Law and Art

Sigmund G. Libowitz

Bennett Gilbert GainesScholarship Fund

Leon D. KatzJ. Thomas Wolfe

Gallagher, Evelius & Jones, LLPEndowed Fund

Gallagher, Evelius & Jones, LLPThomas B. Lewis

General Scholarship FundDavid A. BakerThe Hon. Lynne A. BattagliaJack F. Billig

Janet L. CallisJohn H. Carter, IIIStanton J. Collins, Jr.The Hon. Andre M. Davis &Jessica Strauss

Meryl L. K. EddyChristopher B. EdwardsSamuel E. & Margaret P. FauverRobert T. FranklinDavid H. GambleElaine Q. S. GillDavid S. IannucciYelee Y. KimStephen M. LeGendreThe Hon. Benson E. LeggAva E. Lias-Booker &

Earl Thomas Booker, IVPatricia A. LoganDavid C. PalmerMelissa L. PeppeEstate of Louis M. RiehlWilliam J. RiinaThe Hon. George L. Russell, Jr.Jonathan P. StebenneThe Hon. Joseph D. TydingsJoyce L. WrightClaudia J. Zuckerman

Larry S. Gibson LegacyFellowship Fund

Lynette P. AdamsThe Hon. M. ChristineAllen-Jackson

Steven J. AndersonAbe A. BaileyOrlando D. BarnesRobert Birdsong, Jr.Rodolphe N. BriocheWayne A. & JoanneSaunders Brooks

Andrea Molette BrownLawrence J. BullardClarence L. CampbellEileen A. CarpenterThe Hon. Alice P. & JohnL. Clark, Jr.

The Hon. Brenda A. ClarkPatricia A. Cole-SmithThe Hon. Andre M. DavisEmerson L. Dorsey, Jr.Daphne D. DuverneyMillicent D. Edwards-GordonJeanne M. FranklinCarolyn E. FrazierPatricia L. GatlingThe Hon. Melanie M.Shaw Geter

Roberta L. GillJulie D. GoodwinDavid B. GrahekFrederick C. GrantThe Hon. Clayton Greene, Jr.

Khalilah Nugent HarrisArielle A. Harry-BessYvonne B. HerndonLinda W. HurdLouis G. Hutt, Jr.Lisa L. JacksonFranklin M. LeeJacques E. & Martha W.Leeds, Sr.

Ronald P. LockeCara J. LutherAlemayehu G. MariamBelinda MatlockPatricia MinikonThe Hon. Kenneth C.Montague, Jr.

Howard P. NicholsonTyrone D. PressSolomon ReddickRobyn L. ReyesWilliam A. Sherman, IIDeHaven L. SmithEdward Smith, Jr.Joyce H. StanleyBetty A. StemleyKenneth TalleyKatherine L. VaughnsThe Hon. Rodney C. WarrenKenneth M. WilliamsRomaine N. WilliamsRosetta Kerr WilsonPriscilla Wilson-Milton

Everett Goldberg FundDavid B. GrahekRobert I. KellerPeter E. QuintKatherine L. Vaughns

Robert M. Goldman ScholarshipFund

Robert M. Goldman

Joseph R. Hardiman ScholarshipEndowment

Joseph R. Hardiman

Law & Health Care FundJohn M. BirdJane E. CappielloE. Philip Franke, IIIIyanrick W. JohnAnne S. LangleyJohn F. LessnerEugenia L. LiuRoseanne M. MatriccianiJ. Michael McGuireWilliam I. Weston

Isaac & Catharine S. HechtScholarship Fund

Catharine S. Hecht*

Dr. Richard H. Heller FundThe Hon. Ellen M. Heller & Shale

D. Stiller

Judge Ellen M. Heller and ShaleD. Stiller, Esq. ScholarshipEndowment

The Hon. Ellen M. Heller & ShaleD. Stiller

Professor Stanley S. Herr Fundfor Disability Rights andSocial Justice

Douglas L. ColbertLily GoldRobert I. KellerPeter E. QuintJoshua UdlerKatherine L. Vaughns

HIV Legal Representation FundMaryland Legal Services

Corporation

Samuel and Anne HopkinsScholarship Fund

Henry & Nancy HopkinsT. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.

Houff Scholarship FundEdward F. Houff

International and ComparativeLaw Program

Chrystal T. Edwards*William L. & Theodora H.Reynolds, IIRoger D. & Karen Winston

Maryland Katrina and IndigentDefense Fund

Sedira BananLawrence Bendik—Giftin Honor of: Veronica Berruz

Mary BergJuanita Berruz—Gift in Honor of:Veronica Berruz

Veronica BerruzEvelyn BrumstedGustavo GutierrezJennifer C. HaireMichael HaireFrank R. HubbardMichele JacklinTeresa K. LaMasterBob & Mary Jo LoftusTom LoftusLourdes MaldonadoMelisa M. C. MoonanYvette Oquendo-BerruzNancy F. RheingroverTom & Yvonne Ricciuti

Vicki SchieberLaurie E. ScudderMaureen A. SweeneyHolly SyrrakosDouglas G. TilleyMichael P. & Lisa BurtonVan Alstine

Alicia H. Welch

Leadership Scholars LegacyEndowment

Michelle D. AlbertKarinna M. ArroyoMarita O. AyodeleVeronica BerruzAnne P. BlackfieldAdam D. BlockM. Jason BrookeAmy B. CaiazzaJustin C. CallawayDaniella CasseresPaulina CasseresKathryn L. D’AdamoHelen M. DalphonseCaroline L. FarrellAnthony M. GallegosVince GallegosDuty D. GreeneJoanne S. HawanaHenry & Nancy HopkinsAlexander C. HugginsBenjamin H. HuhDaniel W. IngersollEmily C. JaskotAndrea N. JohnsonDanfeng KoonJonathan M. KucskarAnna R. KupersteinEmily L. LevensonKathryn MallonJessica L. A. MarksRonald MarryottHelena C. MastrogianisPuja P. MehtaAlexandra E. MillardTheresa C. MorseApril M. MortonJasmin A. NunezDavid PantzerMatthew L. PetersEdward J. ReillyAlison M. RosholtBryan K. SaxtonNina H. SchichorReena K. ShahKeith A. ShebairoAlexis P. SlaterJoanne E. SpilichJohn T. StinsonShauna L. StringhamHeather A. TalleyLewis J. Taylor

Javier TiradoMaximilian L. TondroJames F. Van Der SchalieRoberto VelaGeorge R. WaddingtonElisabeth S. WaldenMarcus L. WangPerry N. WassermanAlicia H. WelchAlicia L. WilsonAileen B. Xenakis

Levin and Gann Award forExcellence

Levin & Gann, P.A.

Andrew D. Levy Scholarship Fund(Gifts in Memory of: The Hon.Stanley M. Levy)

Frank & Pam BaglieriRachelle F. BernsteckerThe Hon. Nathan Braverman& Lynn B. Sassin

Edythe C. BrienzaBrown, Goldstein & Levy, LLPChristine AnnWest Cataldo—Gift in Memory of: Harold West

Edwin L. ColodnyAnn L. DyerAllen J. FarrarMarian FisherGordon Croft FoundationDorothy GuttmanAllan P. HillmanH. Judith JarrellAndrew D. & Sandra R. LevyThe Hon. Stanley M.* & HarrietZ. Levy—Gift in Memory of:Morton Blumberg

Roberta Levy-DodgePatricia F. O’ConnorAbigail S. ReedLinda ShiffmanFrancine F. SobonStephen J. WagnerEdith WeisdorfHarold WestLaura WilliamsSusan C. Zimmerman

Law Library FundStanley D. AbramsTaunya L. BanksChristine Jochim BooteJames T. CarrollKristine Easley—Gift inMemory of: Ryan H. Easley

Martin FlajnikCharles & Beverly K. FreelandCaroline M. FrenchAndrew A. GerberAsst. Dean Barbara S. Gontrum

Barbara S. GontrumDavid B. GrahekTacey J. HimelfarbF. Robert Hunter, IIIMalloy & Malloy AttorneysPatrick D. MalloyEmilie Martinko—Gift inMemory of: Ryan H. Easley

Thomas D. RanckDeHaven L. SmithPamela Bluh Van OostenLipmon C. Woon

Loan Repayment AssistanceProgam

Taunya L. BanksMelissa BaumDawna CobbEmerson L. Dorsey, Jr.David B. GrahekDavid S. IannucciRonald KaslRobert I. KellerLewis J. TaylorEllen M. WeberPatricia M. Zweibel

Morton & Sophia Macht Dean’sFund

The Macht Philanthropic Fundof The Associated: JewishCommunity Federation ofBaltimore

Amy MachtLois K. & Phillip Macht

The Gilbert and Jaylee MeadScholarship and FellowshipFund

Citi Global Impact FundingTrust, Inc.

Jaylee Mead

Miles & Stockbridge Endowmentfor Excellence in Business Law

AnonymousMr. & Mrs. Edward J. AdkinsCharles T. BowyerTimothy R. CasgarMichele Levy CohenHenryka W. G. CraigJohn R. DevineSteven D. FrenkilJohn B. FrischJoseph W. & Virginia A.Hovermill

Michael F. Le MireWilliamW. McAllister, Jr.Miles & Stockbridge

Foundation, Inc.John H. MurrayBernard G. Peter, Jr.

JD 2009 70 JD 200971

| CAMPAIGN |

In addition tomakingan annual gift between

July 1, 2008 andJune 30, 2009, donors

listed in bold alsohave made amajor

gift to theMaking anImpact campaign

as of June 30, 2009.

>>

Anonymous

Gina M. Adams

Cheryl Adkins

Bonnie E. Allen

Scott Allen, Sr.

R. Kelvin Antill

Suzanne W. Applefeld

Duane & Donna Arbogast

Gloria L. Asrael

Patricia A. Atkinson-Wagner

Frank & Pam Baglieri

Dean Jose Bahamonde-Gonzalez

E. Clinton & Katharine E.

Bamberger

Sedira Banan

Taunya L. Banks

Richard P. Barth

Carol U. Barton

Arlene J. Bekman

The Hon. Robert M. Bell

M A K I N G A N I M PA C T

F R I E NDS

Friends are individuals that contribute their time, effort and finacncial resources to advancing ourmission. Friends include parents, spouses, family members, legal professionals and more. The Schoolof Law thanks all its friends for their generous contributions.

Frederick W. Runge, Jr.John R. RutledgeMitchell W. ShapiroRonald E. & Ellen ShapiroMilton R. Smith, Jr.John A. StalfortMatthew S. & Donna P. SturtzJ. W. ThompsonWebbStephen C. WinterJefferson V. Wright

M. Peter Moser Fund for Law,Ethics and Public Service

Moser Family Foundation, IncElizabeth K. Moser—Gift inMemory of: M. Peter Moser

The Honorable William H. andMadeline W. MurphyScholarship Endowment

AnonymousThe Hon. William H. Murphy, Jr.

Donald Murray Loan AssistanceFund

Baltimore Community FoundationThe Honorable Samuel I.

Rosenberg

Leonard C. Homer/Ober|KalerLaw and Health Care Fund

Ober | Kaler

Osborne Family ScholarshipFund

Hamish S. & Christine Osborne

Nathan Patz Law Center Fund(Gifts in Memory of:Doris Patz)

Suzanne W. ApplefeldJack F. BilligShirley B. BrownJane W. CohenCommunity Foundation ofNew Jersey

Norman Du BoisHackerman FoundationWillard HackermanBarbara J. HamentH. Thomas HowellJoseph J. KatzWilliam G. & Susan M. KolodnerMorris A. Mechanic Foundation,Inc.—Gift in Memory of:Morris A. Mechanic

Clarisse B. MechanicAllen R. & Ellen P. MyersRobert MyersDoris Patz*—Gift in Honor of:Andrew Heller

Gerry C. Heller

Thomas P. HellerMary Katherine & Charles

ScheelerLois K. SigethyLynne E. StarmanSuzanne L. Wolfson

Roger Redden Memorial FundCarol U. BartonFrank & Elisabeth BurchDavid KnoxElizabeth K. MoserGretchen ReddenWilliam L. & Theodora H.Reynolds, IIFrederick SteinmannAnn M. StillerThe Hon.Thomas J. Waxter, Jr.The Hon. WilliamW. Wenner

Rifkin, Livingston, Levitan &Silver, LLC/Edgar SilverScholarship Fund

Rifkin, Livingston, Levitan& Silver LLC

Rothenberg MemorialScholarship Fund

Lawrence D. RogersJack L. Rothenberg

Karen H. Rothenberg Fund forPublic Service

Gina M. AdamsBonnie E. AllenKirsten Andrews WoelperKenneth S. AnecksteinJames K. ArchibaldAssociated Jewish CommunityFederation

Katherine E. BaerJose Bahamonde-GonzalezMary C. BaldwinE. Clinton & Katharine E.Bamberger

Betty Cockrill BannatRichard P. BarthMary Patricia BaxterMr. & Mrs. Paul D. BekmanJames R. Benjamin, Jr.Timothy F. & Megan RectorBerger

Richard O. BerndtRosanne F. BernsteinDina Kargon BillianLaura B. BlackBrenda Bratton BlomDavid S. Bogen & PatriciaY. Ciricillo

Jeffrey W. BolotinRobert R. Bowie, Jr.Kathryn Webb Bradley

Debbie S. BuchwaldRaymond D. BurkeThe Hon. John Carroll ByrnesPaul S. CaiolaE. Trippe Callahan, Jr.J. Douglas CampbellRhonda Pindell CharlesThe Hon. Howard S. & The Hon.Deborah K. ChasanowDanielle & Louis CitronHeather Doherty ClarkDawna CobbWard B. Coe, IIISean C. ConnorsMark D. & Judith CoplinBrian R. Cyr & Lila G. Shapiro-CyrThomas C. Dame & DeniseM. Duval

Anne M. DeadyMaura L. DeMouy & Kevin M.RobertsonDLA PiperKathleen DonohueEvert Weathersby HouffMartha ErtmanLisa M. FairfaxJoel D. & Ellen S. FedderJames M. FensterwaldJoseph G. Finnerty IIIMiriam L. Fisher & Lawrence

J. Yumkas—Gift in Honor of:Charles & Gail Yumkas

James F. ForsythGordon D. FronkErik Fulwider & Nicole ForelGallagher, Evelius & Jones, LLPHerbert S. GartenJamie & Andrea Seltzer GillespieSaul E. GilsteinT. Sue GladhillMarion K. & Daniel S. GoldbergBarbara S. GontrumSarajane GreenfeldPeter H. & Ulrike GunstSusan HankinHilary HansenJoseph R. HardimanDeborah Hellman & Derek BrownMichael M. HeniganEthel B. HillDiane E. HoffmannMary Alice HohingDavid H. Hollander, Jr.Henry & Nancy HopkinsEdward F. HouffDanielle E. HowarthRenee HutchinsJohn B. IsbisterVeronica R. JenningsJoe Tydings Family FoundationElizabeth M. KameenSarah R. Kaplan

Sherri KeenePeter E. KeithRobert R. Kern, Jr.Andrew KingJames W. KirkGary E. KlausnerFrances KnopfAlvin J. KraftKramon & Graham, P.A.John W. KrausSharon S. Krevor-WeisbaumTeresa K. LaMasterJessica B. LangVictor H. & Jean S. Laws, IIISusan P. LevitonJill A. LionMary R. MartaJamie D. McCourtJames M. McDowellMcGuire Woods LLPMary Helen McNealBruce S. MendelsohnLinda J. MengMiles & Stockbridge, P.C.Michael MillemannPaula A. MonopoliHarold & BarbaraMordkofsky

Dana L. MorrisElizabeth K. Moser—Gift inMemory of: M. Peter Moser

Kelly A. Casey MullallyThe Hon. William H. Murphy, Jr.William H. Murphy, IIIRhonda S. NeuhausLewis A. NoonbergShelley R. NymanMatthewW. OakeyMary E. O’ByrneHamish S. & Christine OsborneMr. & Mrs. Glenn C. Parker, Sr.Karen K. PasciutoLouis Patalano, IVRobert V. PercivalMichael PinardMatthew L. PirnotJoanne & Mark PollakDeborah Lynne PotterBryan Thomas PughConstance K. PutzelPeter E. QuintDavid E. RadermanMarie H. RazulisWilliam L. & Theodora H.Reynolds, IIMary Alice RichardsonJudith Horowitz RichterTrish RiderMary Jo RodneyThe Hon. Samuel I. RosenbergThe Hon. David & PhyllisCheek Ross

Eleanor RothenbergKaren H. Rothenberg & Jeffrey

SeltzerMark A. & Laura RothsteinMargaret Walsh RudmannStuart M. & Suzanne B.

SalsburySaul Ewing LLPMary Katherine & Charles

ScheelerEugene H. & Alice A.

SchreiberSheldon P. SchumanThe Schwab Fund forCharitable Giving

Becky SeltzerJana SingerJames R. SmithHeather L. SpurrierMaxwell StearnsWilliam C. Stifler, IIIStudent Bar AssociationRobert E. SuggsDavid A. SuperJudith K. SykesOtho M. ThompsonMaximilian L. TondroThe Hon. Joseph D. TydingsMichael P. & Lisa BurtonVan Alstine

Irving E. WalkerAndrea R. S. WatkinsRebecca A. WeaverEllen M. Weber

Cyril H. WechtDeborah J. WeimerMarley S. WeissMarilyn AnnWennesLisa B. WilliamsHoward D. Wilson, Jr.Rachel A. WohlRoger C. WolfGordon G. & Ruth FleischerYoung

Charles & Gail B. YumkasZuckerman Spaeder, LLP

Karen Rothenberg and JeffreySeltzer Law & Health CareProgram Endowment

Karen H. Rothenberg & JeffreySeltzer

Stuart M. and Suzanne B.Salsbury Trial Advocacy Fund

Stuart M. & Suzanne B. Salsbury

Schochor, Federico, & StatonScholarship Fund

Schochor, Federico andStaton, P.A.

Ronald L. and Faith M. SchreiberScholarship Fund

Edgar L. & Faith SchreiberFeingold—Gift in Memory of:Melvin Berger

Rochelle Lipsitz

Eugene H. & Alice A. SchreiberMartin H. Schreiber IIMr. & Mrs. Frank Terracina

Larry B. Shoda Award FundAlton A. Shoda

Lucy Wing-Yee ShumMemorialFund

Amarillo Children’s ClinicKevin M. CapinpinIngrid LohErica MahJoanna Fong Yeh

Carole & Hanan Sibel FamilyFund

Hanan Y. & Carole Sibel

Judge Simon Sobeloff Prize FundCommunity Foundation ofFrederick County

Michael J. & Sally KliegmanKatherine L. VaughnsSteven E. Zalesch

Joseph D. Tydings FellowshipToddW. DonaldsonJ.S. Plank and D.M. DicarloFamily Foundation, Inc.

Martha R. LancasterThe Hon. Timothy F.Maloney

Ciaran P. McCarron

Preximco Inc.The Hon. Joseph D. Tydings

Venable Dean’s Fund forExcellence Endowment

William A. AgeeGary M. AlmeterMatthew R. AlsipJames K. ArchibaldJessica B. BostonMichael L. & Laura A.Skowronski Bouyea

George E. ConstantineGregory D. GalliJames & Sabine HanksMary Ellen R. HimesJohn B. HowardArnold E. JablonSigmund G. LibowitzColleen M. MallonMeghan E. MaloneyViktoriya MikityanskayaShpigelman

Timmy F. RuppersbergerJames L. & Barbara B. SheaVenable Foundation, Inc.Kedrick N. WhitmoreTimothy G. WoodhouseW. Robert Zinkham

Women, Leadership & EqualityProgram

Migsie RichlinRoger D. & Karen Winston

JD 200973JD 2009 72

Joseph J. BellingerLawrence BendikMary BergBlair BermanRachelle F. BernsteckerJuanita BerruzSamuel BillupsBrenda Bratton BlomNatalie Blum—Gift inMemory of: David Blum

David S. Bogen & PatriciaY. Ciricillo

Earl Thomas Booker, IVCharles T. BowyerEdythe C. BrienzaRobert & Frances T. BrownGloria G. BrownShirley B. BrownAlice A. BrumbaughEvelyn BrumstedJames F. BrungoElisabeth Harper BurchEvelyn Omega CannonKevin M. CapinpinJane CappielloPaul K. & Kathleen L. CaseyTimothy R. CasgarPaulina CasseresChristine AnnWest CataldoThe Hon. Deborah K. ChasanowPhyllis Cheek RossMeeHo ChinDanielle & Louis CitronDawna CobbJane W. CohenDouglas L. ColbertEdwin L. ColodnyKaren CzapanskiySophie M. DagenaisRosetta K. DeVitoMichael I. DiamondEugene A. DiprinzioKristin C. DollaseKimberly A. DonaldsonToddW. DonaldsonKathleen DonohueNorman Du BoisAnn L. DyerKristine EasleyCrystal EdwardsKathleen A. EgeliGeri EliasPhilip G. EnsticeJay A. EpstienMaureen M. ErcoleMartha ErtmanJohn EverettLisa M. FairfaxAllen J. FarrarSamuel E. & MargaretP. Fauver

Ellen S. FedderFaith Schreiber FeingoldStuart & Ellen H. Fine

Vicki FinkelsteinMitzi FishMargaret G. FisherMarian FisherMorton P. Fisher, Jr.Martin FlajnikGeorge E. FlemingJames F. ForsythNewton B. Fowler, IIIEileen FriedErik Fulwider & Nicole ForelVince GallegosRoger K. & Harriet H. GarfinkDonald G. GiffordJamie & Andrea SeltzerGillespie

Barbara S. GillissT. Sue GladhillLily GoldDaniel S. GoldbergBarbara S. GontrumDavid Good & Lori A. NicolleMarci I. GordonFrancis X. GormleyThe Hon. Kingdon &Mary Gould, Jr.

David B. GrahekOscar GrayI. Michael GreenbergerSarajane GreenfeldMaxine Z. GrosshansUlrike GunstGustavo GutierrezDorothy GuttmanWillard HackermanJennifer C. HaireMichael HaireArdyth L. HallBarbara J. HamentSusan HankinSabine HanksHilary HansenDeborah Hellman &Derek Brown

Michael M. HeniganAmy HennenAllan P. HillmanRichard J. & Margaret C.Himelfarb

Charles S. HirschJacqueline L. HirshTheodore W. & BeatriceE. Hirsh

Laura HoenigDiane E. HoffmannMary Alice HohingNancy HopkinsAlan D. & Brenda HornsteinPhilip M. HorowitzJohn B. HowardH. Thomas HowellFrank R. HubbardRenee HutchinsSherrilyn A. Ifill

Karen JackleyMichele JacklinHillary JacobsH. Judith JarrellRonald KaslJoseph J. & Barbara KatzLeon D. KatzPaula KatzSandra L. KatzSherri KeenePeter E. KeithRobert I. KellerMarguerite KelleyAndrew KingMichael J. & Sally KliegmanCharles R. KnisleyDavid KnoxSusan D. KronickMartha R. LancasterRose C. LaPlacaSelma Rozga LeanMartha W. LeedsThe Hon. Benson E. LeggPatricia LeibowitzHarriet Z. LevySandra R. LevyRoberta Levy-DodgeJill A. LionRochelle LipsitzBob & Mary Jo LoftusTom LoftusIngrid LohKatharine M. LyonAmy MachtPhillip MachtErica MahLourdes MaldonadoKathryn MallonThe Hon. Timothy F. MaloneySylvia T. MarcusShirlee A. MarrsEmilie Martinko—Gift inMemory of: Ryan H. Easley

Ciaran P. McCarronGeorge B. McCeneyTimothy F. McCormackJennifer McManusYvonne V. McMorrisJaylee M. MeadClarisse B. MechanicCarolyn F. MeredithCarol C. MettamRonald D. MettamMichael MillemannEdward E. MoawadPaula A. MonopoliBarbara MordkofskyDana L. MorrisElizabeth K. Moser—Gift in Memory of:M. Peter Moser

Laura V. MrozekKelly A. Casey MullallyJohn H. Murray

Allen R. MyersGail R. MyersRobert MyersShelley R. NymanMatthewW. OakeyYvette Oquendo-BerruzAndreas John OrtmeyerChristine OsborneDorothy ParkerNorman E. Parker, Jr.Barbara PatzDoris Patz*—Gift inHonor of: Andrew Heller

Gerry C. HellerThomas P. HellerRobert V. PercivalMichael PinardMatthew L. PirnotMorton PolandMark PollakRobert G. & Amy F. Pollokoff—Gift in Honor of: JoelD. Fedder

Margaret A. PowellGarrett PowerLois ProgerNorman E. PruittBryan Thomas PughBenton PumpianPeter E. QuintDavid E. RadermanGretchen ReddenSharon ReeceAbigail S. ReedBrian ReevesRussell R. Reno, Jr.William L. & Theodora H.Reynolds, IINancy F. RheingroverTom & Yvonne RicciutiTrish RiderJ. Paul RiegerJohn H. & Susan ObrechtRiehl, IV

Mary Jo RodneyLawrence D. RogersThe Hon. Samuel I. RosenbergLora A. RosenthalEleanor RothenbergJack L. RothenbergKaren H. Rothenberg &

Jeffrey SeltzerMark A. & Laura RothsteinVicki SchieberAlice A. SchreiberLaurie E. ScudderBecky SeltzerEllen ShapiroGerald T. SheaJames L. & Barbara B. SheaG. Daniel Shealer, Jr.Tina H. ShellerKevin L. ShepherdLinda Shiffman

>>Membership in theLegacy Council isextended to all

individuals who haveincluded the School

of Law in theirestate planning.

Donors listed in boldhave made amajor

gift to theMaking anImapact campaignas of June 30, 2009.

JuneW. AuerbachJohn H. Barrett*Frederick E. Beachley*Mary Elizabeth Kurz BrightT. Carroll BrownWilliam M. Canby*The Hon. Clayton C. CarterA. Samuel CookGerald H. * & Phyllis N. CooperMark D. & Judith CoplinChrystal T. Edwards*Robert Farkas*Joel D. Fedder

Edgar L. & Faith SchreiberFeingold

Stanford G. Gann, Sr.Martha L. Ham*Joseph R. HardimanThe Hon. Joel A. HarmatzEmma Ruth Hedeman*Stanley Herr*Alan D. & Brenda HornsteinFrancis N. Iglehart, Jr.*Victor H. Laws, Sr.Ava E. Lias-BookerJames B. Maginnis*

M. Jacqueline McCurdyAbel J. MerrillElizabeth MoserHelen Katona Neel*Philip E. Nuttle, Jr.*Leonard A. OrmanHamish S. & Christine OsborneGlenn & Dorothy ParkerDoris Patz*William J. PittlerJames C. PraleyConstance K. PutzelJohn Corey Qua

Gretchen ReddenCharles P. RevoileLouis M. Riehl*Jean G. RogersKaren Rothenberg & Jeffrey

SeltzerMilton Saul*Eugene H. SchreiberMary W. Stanton*Michael P. & Lisa BurtonVan Alstine

Daniel E. WagnerPaul F. Wooden*

M A K I N G A N I M PA C T

LEGACY COUNC I L

The Legacy Council recognized generous, forward-looking donors who have included the Schoolof Law in their estate planning. Through long-range gift planning, graduates and friends leave alasting legacy at the law school in the form of bequests, gift annuities, charitable remainder trustsand donations of life insurance.

Alton A. ShodaAlexander & Patricia ShortCarole SibelLois K. SigethySidney SilberJana SingerJames R. SmithFrancine F. SobonJohn A. StalfortLynne E. StarmanMaxwell StearnsMarc I. SteinbergGail M. SternAnn M. Stiller

Shale D. StillerJessica StraussRobert E. SuggsLawrence M. SungMaureen A. SweeneyHolly SyrrakosDouglas G. TilleyElysia TomlinsonJudith TortoraRaymond G.Truitt & MaryK. Tilghman

E. Nancy TuckettMichael P. & Lisa BurtonVan Alstine

Pamela Bluh Van OostenKatherine L. VaughnsSarah E. VogelhutCharles & Mary Jo WagandtStephen J. WagnerNancy E. WallsJ. W. ThompsonWebbEllen M. WeberS. Nelson & Barbara K. WeeksDeborah J. WeimerArleenWeinerEdith WeisdorfMarley S. WeissDorrit F. Westheimer

Laura WilliamsAdrienne Williams-ConoverKaren WinstonRoger C. WolfSuzanne L. WolfsonLipmon C. WoonKelly M. WrennJefferson V. WrightFrances M. YoungGordon G. & Ruth Fleischer YoungGail B. YumkasSteven E. ZaleschRobert & Heather ZavodSusan C. Zimmerman

M A K I N G A N I M PA C T

JD 200975JD 2009 74

| CAMPAIGN |

CHAIR

PAUL BEKMAN, ESQ. (’71)Salsbury ClementsBekmanMarder& Adkins, LLC300West Pratt Street, Suite 450Baltimore, MD 21201

MEMBERS

ALISON L. ASTI (’79)Gordon, Feinblatt, Rothman,Hoffberger & Hollander233 East Redwood StreetBaltimore, MD 21202

THE HON. LYNNE A. BATTAGLIA (’74)Court of Appeals of Maryland361 Rowe Boulevard, Third FloorAnnapolis, MD 21401

THE HON. ROBERTM. BELLChief JudgeCourt of Appeals of Maryland111 North Calvert Street, Room 634Baltimore, MD 21202

THE HON. RICHARD D. BENNETT (’73)U.S. District Court of Maryland101 West Lombard StreetBaltimore, MD 21201

LAURA BLACK (’88)Baltimore, MD

DONNA R. BLAUSTEIN (’71)Law Office of Donna R. BlausteinOne Aventura Executive Center20900 NE 30th AvenueSuite 403Aventura, FL 33180

THE HON. BENJAMIN L. CARDIN (’67)U. S. Senate509 Hart Senate Office BuildingWashington, DC 20510

HARRIET E. COOPERMAN (’78)Saul, Ewing LLP100 South Charles StreetBaltimore, MD 21201-2773

THE HON. ANDRE M. DAVIS (’78)U.S. District Court of Maryland101 West Lombard Street, Room 520Baltimore, MD 21201

CHRISTINE A. EDWARDS (’83)Winston & Strawn35West Wacker DriveChicago, IL 60601

JOSEPH G. FINNERTY III (’87)DLA Piper1251 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10020-1104

MIRIAM L. FISHER (’85)Morgan Lewis & Bockius, LLP1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.Washington, DC 20004

JAMES J. HANKS, JR. (’67)Venable, LLPTwo Hopkins Plaza, Suite 1800Baltimore, MD 21201THE HON. ELLEN M. HELLER (’77)Baltimore, MD

THE HON. MARCELLA A. HOLLAND (’83)Baltimore City Circuit Court111N. Calvert Street, Room 412Baltimore, MD 21202

HENRY H. HOPKINS (’68)Baltimore, MD 21202

ALAN D. HORNSTEINProfessor EmeritusUniversity of Maryland School of Law500W. Baltimore StreetBaltimore, MD 21201

EDWARD F. HOUFF (’77)Evert Weathersby Houff120 E. Baltimore Street, Suite 1300Baltimore, MD 21202

THE HON. BARBARA KERR HOWE (’69)Baltimore, MD

JOHN B. ISBISTER (’77)Tydings & Rosenberg, LLP100 East Pratt Street, 26th FloorBaltimore, MD 21202

ROBERT J. KIM (’83)McNamee, Hosea, Jernigan, Kim,Greenan &Walker, PA6411 Ivy Lane, Suite 200Greenbelt, MD 20770

RAYMOND G. LAPLACA (’83)Knight, Manzi, Nussbaum& LaPlaca, PA14440 Old Mill RoadUpper Marlboro, MD 20772

LEWIS LEIBOWITZ (’75)Hogan & Hartson555 13th Street, NWWashington, DC 20004

THOMAS B. LEWIS (’76)Gallagher, Evelius & Jones218 North Charles Street, Suite 400Baltimore, MD 21201

AVA E. LIAS-BOOKER (’86)McGuire Woods7 Saint Paul Street, Suite 1000Baltimore, MD 21202

BRUCE S. MENDELSOHN (’77)Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP590 Madison AvenueNew York, NY 10022

WILLIAMMURPHY, IIIWilliam H. Murphy, Jr. & Associates12 West Madison StreetBaltimore, MD 21201HAMISH S. OSBORNE (’86)Vero Beach, FL

GEORGE F. PAPPAS (’75)Covington & Burling1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, NWWashington, DC 20004-2401

JOANNE E. POLLAK (’76)Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation600 North Wolfe StreetAdministration 414Baltimore, MD 21287-1914

PHILLIP A. PROGER (’73)Jones Day51 Louisiana Avenue, NWWashington, DC 20001

STUARTM. SALSBURY (’71)Salsbury Clements BekmanMarder & Adkins300West Pratt Street, Suite 450Baltimore, MD 21201

MARY KATHERINE SCHEELER (’53)Scheeler & Scheeler714 East Seminary AvenueTowson, MD 21286

EDWARD MANNO SHUMSKY (’73)Partner and CAORabin|Alexander, LLC4000 Ponce de Leon Blvd., Suite 470Coral Gables, Florida 33146

HANAN Y. SIBEL (’58)Lutherville, MD

ARNOLD M.WEINER, ESQ. (’57)Law Offices of Arnold M. Weiner2002 Clipper Park RoadUnit #108Baltimore, MD 21211

Ex-Officio MembersJOSEPH R. HARDIMAN (’62)(Chair Emeritus)Baltimore, MD 21212-1053

FRANCIS B. BURCH, JR. (’74)(Chair Emeritus)DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary6225 Smith AvenueBaltimore, MD 21209-3600

| BOARD OF VISITORS |

In addition to makingan annual gift between

July 1, 2007 andJune 30, 2008, donors

listed in bold alsohave made amajor gift

to theMaking anImpact campaign as

of Nov. 12, 2008.

>>

Anonymous (2)Abraham L. Adler, P.A.Adrian & Vondy, P.L.C.ALH Foundation, Inc.Amarillo Children's ClinicAssociated Jewish

Community FederationAbe A. Bailey, P.A.Baker & Baker, P.A.Mary C. Baldwin, P.A.Baltimore CommunityFoundation

Bank of America United WayCampaign

Black & Decker CorporationLaw Office of Donna R. BlausteinBrown, Goldstein & Levy, LLPBowie & Jensen, LLCCenter for Forensic EconomicStudies

Charles Crane FamilyFoundation, Inc.

Citi Global Impact FundingTrust, Inc.

Community Foundation ofFrederick Co.

Community Foundation ofNew Jersey

Dibble & Miller, P.C.DLA PiperDugan Babij Tolley &Spector, LLC

Law Offices of Mareen L.Duvall, Jr.

Evert Weathersby HouffFidelity Charitable Gift FundFreishtat, Burke, Mullen &Dubnow, LLC

Friedman & FriedmanFoundation

Gordon D. Fronk, P.A.Gallagher, Evelius &

Jones, LLPChristopher G. Gellner, PCE. Paul Gibson, PCGohn, Hankey and Stichel, LLPGordon Croft FoundationLaw Offices of Timothy M.Gunning

Hackerman FoundationHanan & Carole Sibel FamilyFoundation

Law Offices of Howard M.Heneson P.A.

Hollis, Cronan & Coale, LLPJ.S. Plank and D.M. DicarloFamily Foundation, Inc.

James F. Knott Realty GroupJoe Tydings Family FoundationJohn E. Fetzer Institute, Inc.Karas & BradfordLaw Offices of James LeeKatz, P.A.

Keith Campbell Foundationfor the Environment

Kramon & Graham, P.A.Laura & Ronald H. HoenigFoundation

Alan Hilliard Legum, P.A.Lipman, Frizzell & MitchellRuth Atkinson Lusby, P.A.The Macht Philanthropic Fundof The Associated: JewishCommunity Federation ofBaltimore

Malloy & Malloy Attorneys

Maryland Charity CampaignMaryland Legal Services

CorporationMaryland State BarAssociation, Inc.

Sheryl Gandel Mazur, P.C.McGuire Woods LLPMorris A. Mechanic

Foundation, Inc.Law Offices Merrill &Cruttenden, P.A.

Miles & StockbridgeFoundation, Inc.

Miller & Brasington, P.L.Moser Family Foundation, Inc.Murphy & Falcon, P.C.Nash & AssociatesNational Institute for TrialAdvocacy

Law Offices of Stephen J.Nolan, Chartered

Ober | KalerPaul Cordish Memorial FundDeborah L. Potter, P.A.Potts & Potts P.A.Preximco Inc.Proctor & McKee, P.A.Pyle and Entwistle, Attorneyat Law

Rifkin, Livingston, Levitan &Silver LLC

Rochlin, Settleman &Dobres, P.A.

Rosenberg Martin Greenberg, LLPSaar Associates, Inc.Saul Ewing LLPSchochor, Federico andStaton, P.A.

Law Office of Martin H.Schreiber II, LLC

The Schwab Fund forCharitable Giving

Henry E. Schwartz LLCSelect Title & Escrow, Inc.Sher, Garner, Cahill, Richter,Klein & Hilbert, L.L.C.

Sherwood Partners LLCShulman Rogers Gandal Pordy& Ecker PA

Southwest Florida CommunityFoundation

Paul W. Spence, P.A.Lawrence B. Steele, III P.A.Structure Group LLCStudent Bar AssociationT. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.—Gift in Honor of: Henry Hopkins

TRP Program for Charitable GivingTydings & Rosenberg, LLPUSWellness, Inc.Law Offices of Jonathan P.Van Hoven, P.A.

Venable Foundation, Inc.Wexford Science andTechnology, LLC

The Whiting-Turner ContractingCompany

William G. Kolodner Attorney, P.A.Williams, Moore, Shockley,Harrison, LLP

Workers’ Comp Law Firm, LLCLaw Office of Virginia A.Zrake, LLC

Zuckerman Spaeder, LLP

M A K I N G A N I M PA C T

ORGAN I ZAT IONAL DONORS

The School of law thanks our corporation, foundation, law firm and other organization partners.These organizations are committed to advancing the future o flaw in the states of Maryland andbeyond, and together, we continue to serve our communities and accomplish great things.

JD 2009 76

Dean Symposium AdMISSING: COPY & PHOTOS

MORE THAN 200 GRADUATES GATHERED last fall forthe School of Law’s second Black Law Alumni Reunion,enjoying a weekend of fun, fellowship, and substantivediscussions about race, law, and society. A highlight ofthe weekend was the unveiling of “Thurgood Marshall’sEarly Career in Maryland: 1933-1937,” in the MarshallLaw Library. Drawing on three decades of research byProfessor Larry Gibson, the permanent exhibit revealslittle-known facts and stories about the formative yearsof Marshall’s early law practice, and was unveiled by hiswidow Cecilia Marshall in a rare public appearance.

A companion exhibit depicted the leadership effortsof Emerson Dorsey ’79 and Judge Andre Davis ’78, withstudent leaders of the Black Law Students Association, tohave the Law Library named in honor of JusticeMarshall.“Our first reunion five years ago was such a success,that we had to have another. At the same time, wesought to make this onemore substantive, more mean-ingful, andmore fun. I think we succeeded on all counts,”said Dorsey. “We discussed some very important issuesin the African American community today, raisedawareness about how the Law School faculty is address-ing these issues, and reconnected with friend andcolleagues from all over the country.”

University of MarylandSchool of LawBlack Alumni SecondReunion and Symposium

October 1Law & Health Care Program 25th Anniversary Celebration.

October 3The School of Law will celebrate the appointment of Dean Phoebe A.Haddon with “The Global Economy, PoliticalWill, and Challenges forInternational Trade,” featuring a keynote address by Ambassador RonKirk, U.S. Trade Representative, and an address by Dean Haddon.

October 8The Environmental Law Program’s annual Ward Kershaw Conference,“Regulatory Dysfunction in 3D—Toxic Substances Control Act,Consumer Product Safety Act, and Occupational Health and SafetyAct,” will explore novel concepts for regulating toxic substancesin our homes, workplaces, and natural environment.

October 19-22UMB Founders Week.

November 4-6Maryland Public Policy Fellows Program.

November 12-13The International & Comparative Law Program Conference “GlobalGovernance and Multilateralism” will feature a keynote address byMadeline Albright, U.S. Secretary of State from 1997-2001.

November 13Environmental Law ProgramWinetasting Party.

For an updated and comprehensive list of happenings at the School of Law, visit www.law.umaryland.edu/docket

Nonprofit Org.U.S. Postage

PAIDBaltimore, MDPermit No. 2439

University of Maryland School of Law500 W. Baltimore StreetBaltimore, MD 21201-1786

Campus Happenings