school accommodation review holy angels, our lady of

School Accommodation ReviewHoly Angels, Our Lady of Sorrows, St. Leo, St. Louis, St. Mark

Information Binder

Table of Contents

Tab 1 School Accommodation Review Policy (S.09)

Tab 2 Board Report Regarding School Accommodation Review Priority Ranking

Tab 3 Board Minutes for January 22, 2015

Tab 4 Notice of Initiation of School Accommodation Review

Tab 5 School Profile Sheets

Tab 6 Financial Summary

Tab 7 Summary of School Renewal

Tab 8 Summary of Board Approved Capital Program Schools

Tab 9 Understanding the Funding Model

Tab 10 Summary of Tenant and Lease Information

Tab 11 Summary of Community Use/Permits

Tab 12 Site & Floor Plans

Tab 13 Pupil Distribution Maps

Tab 14 Board Approved Fixed Attendance Boundaries

Tab 15 School Accommodation Review Clusters

Tab 16 Area Development Summaries

Tab 17 Parish Boundary Maps

Tab 18 Transportation Policy & Regular Home to School Bus Route Maps

Tab 19 School Safety Report

Tab 20 Planning Options for Consideration

School Accommodation Review Process A High Level Summary

1. The D. of E. prepares report to the Board of Trustees identifying schools orgroups of schools that should be subject to an accommodation review.

2. If the report is approved by Trustees, an accommodation review is initiatedand an Accommodation Review Committee (ARC) is established. In leadingthe review process, the ARC must follow the procedures set out in the Policy.

3. The ARC holds a minimum of four public meetings in accordance with thenotification and timing requirements of the Policy.

4. The ARC prepares and submits its Accommodation Report to the D. of E., andpresents the report to the Board of Trustees.

5. The D. of E. prepares a report to the Board of Trustees regarding the ARC’sfindings and recommendations in its Accommodation Report forconsideration at a regularly scheduled Board meeting.

6. Opportunity for public comment and feedback regarding the Director’sreport is provided at the following Board meeting.

7. The D. of E. prepares a further report to the Board of Trustees responding tothe feedback received at the previous Board meeting. A final decision maybe made by Trustees at this meeting.

POLICY SECTION: SCHOOL SUB-SECTION: POLICY NAME: SCHOOL ACCOMMODATION REVIEW POLICY NO: S.09

Page 1 of 16

Date Approved: Review Cycle: Dates of Amendment: February 19, 2015

September 2017 Jan 24, 2007; September 11 2014; January 15, 2015

Cross Reference: Ministry of Education Pupil Accommodation Review Guideline, 2009 T.07 Community Engagement, 2012 Attachment(s): Purpose: In carrying out its mandate to provide quality education the Toronto Catholic District School Board is committed to maximizing the efficient utilization of its physical, financial and human resources. This Policy provides the process by which school accommodation reviews will be implemented and facilitated within the TCDSB. Scope and Responsibility: This Policy applies to all schools of the Toronto Catholic District School Board. The Director of Education is responsible for this Policy. Alignment with MYSP: Fostering Student Achievement and Well-being Stewardship of Resources Strengthening Public Confidence Financial Impact: Over and above the costs associated with running a minimum of four public meetings prescribed under the Ministry Guidelines (which may include the services of a facilitator), it is anticipated that the Toronto Catholic District School Board would incur limited costs related to the implementation of the school accommodation review process itself.


Page 2 of 16

The end result of a school accommodation review process could potentially provide the Board with the opportunity to realize substantial savings by balancing enrolment and right-sizing schools, with a focus on larger rather than smaller schools. Legal Impact: The Board could be involved in legal proceedings if the accommodation review process was not implemented in accordance with the Board’s School Accommodation Review Policy. The Ministry Guidelines provide a formal process which must be followed if the Board’s implementation of the accommodation review process is challenged.

Policy: The Toronto Catholic District School Board (the Board) is committed to providing the best educational opportunities and to enhancing the learning environment in its schools for the elementary and secondary school-age population of the City of Toronto. Decisions regarding school accommodation reviews, such as the need to consolidate, close or relocate one or more schools, will be based on the consideration of a combination of factors including socio-demographics, government policies and initiatives, curriculum, programming, and the condition and functionality of school buildings. Decisions made under this Policy will take into account input received from the school community(ies) during the accommodation review process in accordance with the Board’s Policies and the Ministry of Education Pupil Accommodation Review Guidelines. Principles: “Besides the good of the individual, there is a good that is linked to living in society: The common good. It is the good of all of us, made up of individuals, families and intermediate groups who constitute society...” Pope Benedict Through the Catholic Social Teachings and its Multi-Year Strategic Plan, the TCDSB is committed to establishing integrated decision-making structures and processes to support responsive and responsible allocation of resources, including the provision of equitable, affordable and sustainable learning facilities. The following principles will be used as a foundation to support the mission and vision of the Toronto Catholic District School Board through a school accommodation review process: 1. The TCDSB is committed to responsibly providing optimal learning facilities for the

common good while, at the same time, making it possible for all to come to their full potential as persons and to be all that God intends them to be.

2. Schools will have meaningful connections with a Roman Catholic parish and structured links to their community.

3. Students of the TCDSB have the right to attend Catholic schools that provide reasonable community access, and the Board has a responsibility to provide schools that optimally enhance student learning opportunities in the 21st century.


Page 3 of 16

4. The Catholic principle of subsidiarity promotes the establishment of groups of parents and stakeholders whose purpose is to actively participate in the school accommodation review process, contributing to decisions that consider the value of schools to the parish and community. “God has created us to live in solidarity. This means to live in union with one another, supporting one another, committed to the common good, the good of all and each individual, because we are all responsible for all.” Pope John Paul II

Regulations: 1. Accessibility of School Accommodation Review Policy and Ministry Guidelines

A copy of the Board’s School Accommodation Review Policy (S.09), the Ministry of Education’s Pupil Accommodation Review Guideline and the Administrative Review of Accommodation Review Process shall be made available at the Board’s office and shall be posted on the Board’s website.

2. Initiation of a School Accommodation Review

(a) The Director of Education shall prepare a report for consideration by the Board of Trustees identifying a school or group of schools in which challenges may be faced in providing a suitable and equitable range of learning opportunities for students, and in respect of which there may be a need to consider the possible consolidation, closure or program relocation in respect of one or more schools.

(b) A school or group of schools may be considered for study if one or more of the

following conditions apply:

Clear, evident and reasonable opportunities have been explored to provide a suitable and equitable range of learning opportunities for students.

Clear, evident and reasonable attempts to increase enrolment have been explored while minimizing the impact on the learning environment.

Innovative solutions have been implemented or tried in the school or group of schools to enhance programs and learning opportunities.

Teaching/learning spaces are not suitable to provide the programs needed to serve the community and retrofitting may be cost prohibitive.

Under normal staffing allocation practices, it would be necessary to assign three grades to one class in one or more of the schools.


Page 4 of 16

The cost of renovating the teaching and learning space is prohibitive. One or more of the schools is operating in a leased facility. In respect of one or more of the schools, there are safety and/or

environmental concerns related to the building, the school site or its locality.

It has been no less than five years since the inception of a study of the school by an Accommodation Review Committee, except where extenuating circumstances warrant, such as an unexpected economic or demographic shift, or a change in a school’s physical condition.

3. Establishing an Accommodation Review Committee (ARC)

After considering the Director of Education’s report, the Board may approve the establishment of an ARC for each area approved for accommodation review. Parents/guardians, staff, school council members and student council members of the schools approved for accommodation review shall be informed through the Office of the Director of Education of the Board’s decision to form an ARC, and the decision shall be posted on the Board’s website. Residents surrounding the schools under review, the parish, and parents shall be informed by letter. Unless warranted by exceptional circumstances, schools shall only be subject to an accommodation review once in a five year period. (a) Overall Mandate of the ARC

The mandate of each ARC established is to lead the public review of a school or group of schools. ARCs shall assume an advisory role and shall review, report and provide recommendations that will inform the final decision made by the Board of Trustees regarding the accommodation options under consideration for the school or group of schools under review. Subject to Section 6 of this Policy, decisions that might require consolidation, closure or program relocation shall take into account the needs of all the students in all of the schools in a particular group. There may however, be circumstances in which a single school should be studied for closure or relocation. ARCs are required to follow the procedures set out in this Policy.

(b) Composition of the ARC ARCs shall be appointed by the Board and must include membership drawn from the school community, as well as the broader community. ARCs shall include parents/guardians, educators, Board officials and community members.


Page 5 of 16

The ARC shall consist of the following people participating as members of the Committee. (i) A Trustee who does not represent any of the schools under review shall be

appointed as Chair of the ARC. The appointment shall be made by the Board of Trustees. The Trustee(s) representing the area under review shall be a voting member(s) of the ARC.

(ii) From each school affected: the school superintendent or designate (voting member); the school principal or designate (voting member); one representative from the teaching staff (voting member); one representative from the non-teaching staff (voting member); the School Advisory Council Chair or designate; at a minimum,

the number of parents on the ARC should equal representation by school staff (voting members);

the Pastor(s) or representative(s) of the parish(es) to which belong the schools under review (voting member);

one student representative from each secondary school under review (voting member);

a member of the community such as a municipal councillor or delegate, or member of the business community (voting member).

The School Superintendent(s) on the ARC shall function as secretary and in a resource capacity, and shall among other duties, provide notification of public meetings, ensure that appropriate note takers are present at all meetings, prepare meeting agendas as required, facilitate the exchange of information to and from the ARC, and ensure that meeting notes and all information relevant to the accommodation review is made public and readily accessible by having it posted on the Board’s website.

(iii) Resource appointments to the ARC may consist of the following:

staff from the Planning and Facilities Superintendency, including Transportation;

other administrative staff as necessary.

The ARC shall be deemed to be properly constituted whether or not all the listed members are present and able to participate at public meetings.


Page 6 of 16

(c) Roles and Responsibilities of the ARC

(i) Terms of Reference The ARC shall be provided with Terms of Reference prepared by Board staff which will contain the various components of the accommodation review process such as mandate and membership of the ARC, roles and responsibilities of the ARC, procedures for the ARC including community consultation and public meetings and the support to be provided by Board staff. The Terms of Reference will also contain Reference Criteria including educational and accommodation related criteria to be used for examining schools under review and accommodation options under consideration. Examples of Reference Criteria may include site size, school capacity, school utilization, grade configuration and program offerings. A template for the Terms of Reference is provided as Schedule “A” in this Policy document.

(ii) School Information Profile The ARC shall be provided with a School Information Profile prepared by Board staff for each of the schools under review. The School Information Profile shall include the following four considerations about the school(s): value to the student, value to the Board, value to the community, value to the local economy. Examples of factors that may be considered under each of these areas are provided in the School Information Profile template included as Schedule “B” in this Policy document. Other factors that could be used to reflect local circumstances and priorities which may help to further understand the school(s) may be introduced by the ARC. The ARC shall discuss and consult about the School Information Profile(s), and modify where appropriate. The School Information Profile(s) is intended to familiarize the ARC and community members with the school(s) under review in light of the objectives and Reference Criteria outlined in the Terms of Reference.

(iii) Public Information and Access (1) ARCs shall ensure that all information relevant to the

accommodation review is made public and available in advance of


Page 7 of 16

public consultations by having it posted in a prominent location on the Board’s website and making it available in print upon request.

(2) ARCs shall provide information to the affected school communities on an ongoing basis, as required.

(3) ARCs shall ensure that information that is technical in nature be provided/explained in plain language.

(4) ARCs shall be provided with all relevant data in the possession of the Board in order to carry out its mandate. This shall include background information about the school(s) under review. This information shall include, but not necessarily be limited to, the following:

site size and school capacity; site plans and floor plans; maps of the area; portable accommodation; current, historic and projected enrolment; school organization and programming information; location of where students reside; school boundaries/attendance areas; broad local demographic information; population of all publicly funded schools in the area; parish boundaries; local parish population – families with children of school

age; Catholic service factor for all schools under review; information regarding new housing development; information on transportation services; expenditures and revenues with particular emphasis on

school operations (ie. utilities, cleaning, routine maintenance) and school administration;

information regarding capital renewal needs; and information regarding current community use (tenant

information/agreements, permit holders).


Page 8 of 16

(5) ARCs shall be informed about partnership opportunities, or lack thereof, with other school boards and appropriate public organizations that are financially sustainable, safe for students, and protect the core values and objectives of the Board, as identified as part of the Board’s long term planning process.

(6) Board staff shall respond to requests for additional information from the ARC, as required.

(iv) Accommodation Options

(1) To assist the ARC with its review, Board staff shall provide the

ARC with at least two alternative accommodation options for consideration; such options to address where students would be accommodated, what changes to existing facilities may be required, what programs would be available to students, and transportation requirements. If the options require new capital funding, the ARC shall be informed about the availability of funding, and where no funding exists, how students would be accommodated if funding does not become available.

(2) The ARC may, if it deems necessary, develop alternative

accommodation options in light of the objectives and Reference Criteria contained in the Terms of Reference. Board staff shall provide the necessary information to enable the ARC to develop and consider alternative options. If alternative options require new capital funding, the ARC shall be informed about the availability of funding. Where no funding exists, the ARC, with the support of Board staff, will address how students would be accommodated if funding does not become available.

(v) Community Consultation and Public Meetings

(1) ARCs shall ensure that a wide range of school and community

groups are invited to participate in the consultation. These groups may include school councils, parents/guardians, students, school staff and administration, the local community and other interested parties, alumni and ratepayer associations.


Page 9 of 16

(2) ARCs shall consult and seek input and community feedback on the School Information Profile(s), and may, as a result of consultations, modify the Profile(s).

(3) ARCs shall seek input and community feedback regarding the accommodation options under consideration, as well as the ARC’s Accommodation Report and recommendations to the Board. Discussions shall be based on the Terms of Reference and the School Information Profile(s).

(4) ARCs shall operate within the timelines stated in this Policy and shall hold a minimum of 4 public meetings for consultation. These meetings shall be open to the public.

(5) ARCs shall provide advance notice of public meetings using different methods of notification. Public meetings should be held at the schools under review, or in a nearby facility if physical accessibility cannot be provided at any of the schools under review.

(6) ARCs shall structure public meetings to encourage an open and informed exchange of views.

(7) ARCs shall make available in advance, all relevant information

developed to support the discussions at the public meetings.

(8) ARCs shall ensure that minutes/notes reflecting the full range of opinions expressed at the public meetings are recorded and made publicly available by having them posted on the Board website.

(9) ARCs and Board staff shall respond to questions they consider relevant to the review process, which are raised at public meetings, or shall provide a written response appended to the minutes/notes of the meeting and made available on the Board’s website if a response during the meeting is not possible.

(10) ARCs shall facilitate at least one session with the student council

of any secondary school under review.

(vi) ARC Report and Recommendations


Page 10 of 16

(1) ARCs shall prepare an Accommodation Report with accommodation recommendations consistent with the objectives and Reference Criteria in the Terms of Reference. The needs of all students attending schools under review shall be considered.

(2) ARCs shall consider and address, among other factors which may arise, the following matters in its report:

Program implications for the students both in the school

under consideration for consolidation, closure or program relocation and in the school(s) where programs may be affected by the schools being consolidated.

The effects of consolidation, closure or program relocation on the following: - the attendance area defined for the schools; - attendance at other schools; - the need and extent of bussing.

The financial effects of consolidating or not consolidating the school, including any capital implications.

Savings expected to be realized as a result of the consolidation, closure or program relocation. - school operations (utilities, cleaning, routine

maintenance). - expenditures to address school renewal issues which

will no longer be required. Revenue implications as a result of the consolidation,

closure or program relocation. Additional expenditures, if any, at schools which will

accommodate students displaced as a result of a consolidation, closure or program relocation decision taken by the Board. - school operations (utilities, cleaning, routine

maintenance) - teaching staff and administration - school renewal - student transportation

Net savings/costs associated with: - teaching staff and administration - paraprofessionals - student transportation


Page 11 of 16

The possible alternative use or disposition of any empty building.

(3) ARCs shall present and share their report with the community

during public consultation, and shall consider changes to the report based on feedback received.

(4) ARCs shall submit the Accommodation Report with recommendations to the Director of Education for review, and arrange to have it posted on the Board’s website through the Director of Education’s office.

(5) ARCs shall present their Accommodation Report to the Board of

Trustees. 4. Timelines for an Accommodation Review Process

(i) After the Board has approved and announced an accommodation review, a

minimum of 30 calendar-days notice must be provided prior to the first of four required public meetings.

(ii) Beginning with the first public meeting, the public consultation period shall be no less than 90 calendar-days.

(iii) After the ARC has submitted its Accommodation Report to the Director of Education, a minimum of 60 calendar-days notice must be provided prior to the Board meeting at which Trustees will vote on recommendations.

(iv) Extended school holidays such as spring and summer break, and

Christmas, including adjacent weekends, shall not be considered part of the 30, 60 or 90 calendar-day notice periods.

5. Consideration of the ARC’s Accommodation Report by the Board

(a) After the Director of Education has received the ARC’s report and recommendations, and after the ARC has presented its report to the Board of Trustees, the Director of Education shall prepare a report for consideration by the Corporate Affairs, Strategic Planning and Property Committee in public session at a regularly scheduled meeting, regarding the ARC’s findings and recommendations, as well as staff comments and recommendations.


Page 12 of 16

(b) The Director of Education’s report shall be made publicly available and posted on the Board’s website in advance of the Committee meeting at which it is to be considered.

(c) The following material shall be included as appendices to the Director of Education’s report: (i) ARC report and recommendations; (ii) minutes/notes of ARC meetings; (iii) submissions received by the ARC from the public; (iv) submissions received by the Board directly from the public.

(d) The recommendation(s) contained in the Director of Education’s report shall consist of one or more of the following: (i) to maintain the schools and to continue to monitor them; (ii) to reorganize the schools, their programs or their grade structures; (iii) to change the boundaries of the school(s); (iv) to consolidate and/or close one or more of the schools.

(e) Opportunity for public input regarding both the ARC’s Accommodation Report and the Director of Education’s Report shall be provided at a subsequent meeting of the Corporate Affairs, Strategic Planning and Property Committee which will hear delegations and receive written submissions.

(f) The Director of Education shall prepare a further report for consideration by the Corporate Affairs, Strategic Planning and Property Committee in public session at a subsequent regularly scheduled meeting, regarding the public input received and presentations made at the previous Committee meeting. A final decision regarding the school(s) under review may be made as early as this Committee Meeting.

(i) The report shall include a copy of the presentations and submissions, as

well as minutes from the previous meeting. (ii) Recommendations made in the Director of Education’s previous report

may be revised, if necessary. (iii) The Director of Education’s report shall be made publicly available and

posted on the Board’s website in advance of the Committee meeting at which it is to be considered.

(iv) The Board of Trustees may decide to close a school(s) despite an ARC recommendation not to close.


Page 13 of 16

(v) The school community(ies) whose schools have been under review shall be notified in writing of the Board’s decision, and the decision shall also be posted on the Board’s website.

(g) Any Board decision to consolidate or close a school(s), or relocate program(s),

shall be planned for, and implemented no sooner than the following school year.

(h) If the Board of Trustees decides to close a school(s), the Board shall provide clear timelines around when the school(s) will close. If the timelines have expired, the Board will be required to move a motion to extend those timelines and support the original motion on the accommodation review process to continue.

6. Application of Accommodation Review Guidelines

(a) The Pupil Accommodation Review Guidelines shall apply to schools offering elementary or secondary regular day-school programs.

(b) While the Pupil Accommodation Review Guidelines shall not apply under the following circumstances, the Board shall consult with local communities about proposed accommodation options for students in advance of any decision by the Board.

(i) A replacement school to be built on the existing site, or rebuilt or acquired

within the existing school attendance boundary as identified through the Board’s existing policies.

(ii) When a lease is terminated. (iii) The relocation, in any school year or over a number of school years, of

one or more grades or programs, where the enrolment in such grade(s) or program(s) accounts for less than 50% of the school enrolment. This calculation is based on the enrolment at the time of the relocation or the first phase of a relocation implemented over a number of school years.

(iv) The temporary accommodation of the school population off-site while the permanent school is being repaired or renovated in order to ensure the safety of students during the renovation/repair period.

(v) Facilities which serve as a holding school for a school community whose permanent school is over-subscribed and/or is under construction or repair.

7. Administrative Review of Accommodation Review Process

If a review of the Board’s accommodation review process is requested, the Board shall follow the requirements of the Ministry of Education’s Administrative Review of

POLICY SECTION: SCHOOL

SUB-SECTION:

POLICY NAME: SCHOOL ACCOMMODATION REVIEW

POLICY NO: S.09

Page 14 of 16

Accommodation Review Process which forms part of the Pupil Accommodation Review Guidelines.

Evaluation and Metrics:

1. Annual report to the Board about school accommodation reviews implemented at TCDSB.

2. Feedback from stakeholders impacted by each school accommodation review.


Page 15 of 16

Schedule “A”

TERMS OF REFERENCE

1. Mandate of the ARC

2. Composition of the ARC (including voting and non-voting members)

3. Roles and Responsibilities of the ARC

4. Roles and Responsibilities of Board Staff

5. Community Consultation and Public Meetings

6. Accessibility to and Availability of Public Information

7. Parameters and reference criteria for schools under review will include, but not

necessarily be limited to, the following:

site size and school capacity; site plans and floor plans; portable accommodation; current, historic and projected enrolment; utilization rates; demographic information; information regarding new housing development; maps; grade configuration, program availability and staffing; information on transportation services and policies; information regarding capital renewal needs; financial profile on expenditures and revenues; community use of school including leases and permits.


Page 16 of 16

Schedule “B” SCHOOL INFORMATION PROFILE

Value to the Student

the learning environment at the school; student outcomes at the school; course and program offerings; extracurricular activities and extent of student participation; the ability of the school’s physical space to support student learning; the ability of the school’s grounds to support healthy physical activity and extracurricular

activities; accessibility of the school for students with disabilities; safety of the school; proximity of the school to students/length of bus ride to school.

Value to the School Board

student outcomes at the school; course and program offerings; availability of specialized teaching spaces; condition and location of school; value of the school if it is the only school within the community; fiscal and operational factors (e.g. enrolment vs. available space, cost to operate the

school, cost of transportation, availability of surplus space in adjacent schools, cost to upgrade the facility so that it can meet student learning objectives).

Value to the Community

facility for community use; program offerings at the school that serve both students and community members (e.g.

adult ESL); school grounds as green space and/or available for recreational use; school as a partner in other government initiatives in the community; value of the school if it is the only school within the community.

Value to the Local Economy

school as a local employer; availability of cooperative education; availability of training opportunities or partnerships with business; attracts or retains families in the community; value of the school if it is the only school within the community.

SCHEDULE ‘A’ TERMS OF REFERENCE

Mandate of the ARC The overall mandate of an ARC is to lead the public review process. In playing an advisory role, the ARC reviews all relevant information, prepares and submits to the Director of Education, a report with recommendations that will inform the final decision made by the Board of Trustees regarding the school or group of schools under review. Composition of the ARC An ARC must include membership from the school community, as well as the broader community, and will include Trustees, parents/guardians, educators, Board officials, secondary school students (if applicable) and community members.

The ARC shall consist of the following people participating as members of the Committee.

(i) A Trustee who does not represent any of the schools under review shall be appointed as Chair of the ARC. The appointment shall be made by the Board of Trustees. The Trustee(s) representing the area under review shall be a voting member(s) of the ARC.

(ii) From each school affected: • the school superintendent or designate (voting member); • the school principal or designate (voting member); • one representative from the teaching staff (voting member); • one representative from the non-teaching staff (voting member); • the School Advisory Council Chair or designate; at a minimum, the number of

parents on the ARC should equal representation by school staff (voting members); • the Pastor(s) or representative(s) of the parish(es) to which belong the schools

under review (voting member); • one student representative from each secondary school under review (voting

member); • a member of the community such as a municipal councilor or delegate, or member

of the business community (voting member).

(iii) Resource appointments to the ARC may consist of the following: • staff from the Planning and Facilities Superintendency, including Transportation; • other administrative staff as necessary.

The School Superintendent(s) on the ARC shall function as secretary and in a resource capacity, and shall, among other duties:

• provide notification of public meetings; • ensure that appropriate note takers are present at all meetings; • prepare meeting agendas as required; • facilitate the exchange of information to and from the ARC; • ensure that meeting notes and all information relevant to the accommodation review is

made public and readily accessible by having it posted on the Board’s website.

Roles and Responsibilities of the ARC In assuming an advisory role and leading the public process, the ARC will be responsible for the following.

• To follow procedures set out in the Policy. • To ensure that all information relevant to the review process is available to the affected

school communities and to the public, in advance of public meetings. • To ensure that information that is technical in nature be provided in a user-friendly or

more easily understood manner. • To hold a minimum of four public meetings for consultation. • To ensure that a wide range of school and community groups are invited to participate in

the consultation. • To provide advance notice of public meetings, and to structure these meetings to

encourage dialogue. • To seek input and community feedback on the School Information Profile. • To seek input and community feedback regarding the accommodation options under

consideration. • If deemed necessary by the ARC, to develop alternative accommodation option(s), in

addition to the two options provided by Board staff. • To ensure that minutes/notes from the public meetings are recorded and made publicly

available. • To facilitate at least one session with the student council of any secondary school under

review. • The preparation of an Accommodation Report (with recommendations) in accordance

with Regulation 3(c)(vi)(2) of the Policy. • To share its report with the community during public consultation and to consider any

revisions to the report based on feedback received. • Submission of Accommodation Report to the Director of Education and to arrange to have

it posted on the Board’s website. • Presentation of Accommodation Report to the Board of Trustees.

Roles and Responsibilities of Board Staff

• To provide the ARC with all relevant data and information on which to base discussion in order for the ARC to carry out its mandate (as per Regulation 3(c)(iii)(4) of the Policy), including at least two accommodation options for consideration.

• To inform the ARC about any potential partnership opportunities. • To respond to requests for information by the ARC, as required. • To prepare reports through the Director of Education for the consideration of the Board

of Trustees, in accordance with Regulation 5 of the Policy.

Community Consultation and Public Meetings • The ARC is required to hold a minimum of four public meetings for consultation. • These meetings are open to the public. • A minimum of 30 calendar-days notice must be provided prior to the first public meeting. • Beginning with the first public meeting, public consultation must occur over a period of

at least 90 days. • A minimum notification period of 60 calendar-days must be provided prior to the meeting

at which Trustees will make a final decision regarding the accommodation review. • Extended school holidays (spring and summer break, Christmas) including adjacent

weekends are not to be considered part of the 30, 60 and 90 calendar-day requirements. Accessibility to and Availability of Public Information

• All information relevant to the accommodation review and used by the ARC is to be made public and available in advance of public meetings by having it posted on the Board website, and available in print upon request.

• The recording of minutes/notes reflecting discussions at public meetings are to be made publicly available by having them posted on the Board website.

• The ARC’s Accommodation Report is to be posted on the Board website after it has been submitted to the Director of Education.

• Reports prepared by the Director of Education are to be made publicly available by having them posted on the Board website prior to consideration by the Board of Trustees.

• Written submissions received from the public are to be made publicly available by having them posted on the Board website.

• The Board of Trustee’s decision regarding the school(s) under review is to be posted on the Board website. In addition, the school community(ies) whose schools have been under review are to be informed by letter about the Board’s decision.

Parameters and Reference Criteria for Schools Under Review

• Site size and school capacity; Tab 5 – School Profile Sheets • Site plans and floor plans; Tab 12 – Site & Floor Plans • Portable accommodation; Tab 5 – School Profile Sheets • Current, historic and projected enrolment; Tab 5 – School Profile Sheets • Utilization rates; Tab 5 – School Profile Sheets • Demographic information;

Please refer to the City of Toronto Demographic Profiles at this time. http://www1.toronto.ca/wps/portal/contentonly?vgnextoid=1c3c5674c52c1410VgnVCM10000071d60f89RCRD&vgnextchannel=1e68f40f9aae0410VgnVCM10000071d60f89RCRD http://www1.toronto.ca/wps/portal/contentonly?vgnextoid=d337606bc72c1410VgnVCM10000071d60f89RCRD&vgnextchannel=1e68f40f9aae0410VgnVCM10000071d60f89RCRD http://www1.toronto.ca/wps/portal/contentonly?vgnextoid=1d310e32cc2c1410VgnVCM10000071d60f89RCRD&vgnextchannel=1e68f40f9aae0410VgnVCM10000071d60f89RCRD

http://www1.toronto.ca/wps/portal/contentonly?vgnextoid=1c3c5674c52c1410VgnVCM10000071d60f89RCRD&vgnextchannel=1e68f40f9aae0410VgnVCM10000071d60f89RCRD



http://www1.toronto.ca/wps/portal/contentonly?vgnextoid=d337606bc72c1410VgnVCM10000071d60f89RCRD&vgnextchannel=1e68f40f9aae0410VgnVCM10000071d60f89RCRD



http://www1.toronto.ca/wps/portal/contentonly?vgnextoid=1d310e32cc2c1410VgnVCM10000071d60f89RCRD&vgnextchannel=1e68f40f9aae0410VgnVCM10000071d60f89RCRD



http://www1.toronto.ca/wps/portal/contentonly?vgnextoid=a6420e32cc2c1410VgnVCM10000071d60f89RCRD&vgnextchannel=1e68f40f9aae0410VgnVCM10000071d60f89RCRD http://www1.toronto.ca/wps/portal/contentonly?vgnextoid=95340e32cc2c1410VgnVCM10000071d60f89RCRD&vgnextchannel=1e68f40f9aae0410VgnVCM10000071d60f89RCRD http://www1.toronto.ca/wps/portal/contentonly?vgnextoid=0dff457bae2c1410VgnVCM10000071d60f89RCRD&vgnextchannel=1e68f40f9aae0410VgnVCM10000071d60f89RCRD

• Information regarding new housing development; Tab 16 – Area Development Summary • Maps; Tabs 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 20 • Grade configuration, program availability and staffing; Tab 5 –School Profile Sheets • Information on transportation services and policies; Tab 18 –Transportation • Information regarding capital renewal needs; Tab 5, Tab 7 • Financial profile on expenditures and revenues; Tab 6 • Community use of school including leases and permits. Tab 10 and Tab 11

http://www1.toronto.ca/wps/portal/contentonly?vgnextoid=a6420e32cc2c1410VgnVCM10000071d60f89RCRD&vgnextchannel=1e68f40f9aae0410VgnVCM10000071d60f89RCRD



http://www1.toronto.ca/wps/portal/contentonly?vgnextoid=95340e32cc2c1410VgnVCM10000071d60f89RCRD&vgnextchannel=1e68f40f9aae0410VgnVCM10000071d60f89RCRD



http://www1.toronto.ca/wps/portal/contentonly?vgnextoid=0dff457bae2c1410VgnVCM10000071d60f89RCRD&vgnextchannel=1e68f40f9aae0410VgnVCM10000071d60f89RCRD



PUBLIC

SCHOOL ACCOMMODATION REVIEW

PRIORITY RANKING

“From him the whole body, joined and held together by every supporting ligament, grows and builds itself up in love, as each part does its work, Ephesians 4:16.”

Vision: At Toronto Catholic we transform the world through witness, faith, innovation and action.

Mission: The Toronto Catholic District School Board is an inclusive learning community rooted in the love of Christ. We educate students to grow in grace and knowledge and to lead lives of faith, hope and charity.

G. Poole Associate Director of Academic Affairs

A. Sangiorgio Associate Director of Planning and Facilities

Angela Gauthier Director of Education

Created, Draft First Tabling Review September 8, 2014 January 22, 2015 Click here to enter a date. John Volek, Sr. Coordinator, Planning, Accountability and Admissions Loretta Notten, Superintendent of Governance, Policy and Strategic Planning

RECOMMENDATION REPORT

REPORT TO CORPORATE AFFAIRS, STRATEGIC

PLANNING AND PROPERTY COMMITTEE

Page 11 of 128

A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Toronto Catholic District School Board has a long tradition of serving the families and communities of Toronto, providing faith-based education centred on our Catholic Gospel values. The TCDSB Multi-Year Strategic Plan currently identifies six priorities, which invite us to ensure that the TCDSB legacy and publicly funded Catholic education in Toronto remains vibrant, while also respectful of our responsibility for effective stewardship of resources.

Ministry funding for new construction is tied to a school board’s success in maximizing the efficiency and utilization of existing space in its schools. It is unlikely that the Ministry will fund new spaces and replacement schools if there is underutilized capacity in nearby schools. The consolidation of low enrolment and underutilized schools is looked upon favourably by the Ministry of Education. Increasing efficiencies through consolidation creates capital funding opportunities for new schools, additions and other capital improvements at schools receiving students as a result of consolidation.

Various Ministry initiatives and supports are in place for consolidation leading to balanced enrolments, right-sizing of schools and increased efficiency in the use of existing school spaces. The Ministry of Education School Board Efficiencies and Modernization (SBEM) initiative promotes a more efficient use of school space as well as providing capital funding to support consolidations and right-sizing of school facilities. Based on discussions with Ministry staff, school Boards will have opportunities in the spring and fall of 2015 to apply for Capital Priorities funding for capital projects addressing accommodation pressure, facility condition, and school consolidation.

Criteria have been developed by Board staff to evaluate and assess all elementary schools with excess capacity and low or declining enrolment. Appendix ‘A’ identifies groups of schools with respect to the initiation of School Accommodation Reviews.

The Ministry of Education has allocated a total of $8.3M Province-wide to support policy development and capacity building to undertake the planning necessary to make more efficient use of school space. Board staff submitted a proposal for funding necessary to secure additional staff to address School Accommodation Reviews and boundary reviews.

Page 12 of 128

This report recommends that the following School Accommodation Reviews be considered in accordance with School Accommodation Review Policy (S.09):

Completion Cycle

Trustee School Cluster

1 Davis Senhor Santo Cristo

St. Luke

1 Davis St. Bruno

St. Raymond

1 Andrachuk

Holy Angels

Our Lady of Sorrows St. Leo

St. Louis

St. Mark

2 Tanuan

Blessed Pier Giorgio Frassati Sacred Heart

St. Bede St. Gabriel Lalemant

2 Tanuan

Prince of Peace

St. Rene Goupil The Divine Infant

2 Del Grande Kennedy

Holy Redeemer Our Lady of Guadalupe

St. Matthias St. Timothy

3 Poplawski

St. Luigi

St. Rita St. Sebastian

3 Crawford Immaculate Heart of Mary St. Theresa Shrine

3 Del Grande Rizzo

Blessed Trinity St. Agnes

St. Gabriel

Page 13 of 128

B. PURPOSE

1. The Ministry of Education’s current Capital Priorities Funding focus is onprojects that promote efficient use of space.

2. This report seeks approval of School Accommodation Reviews in accordancewith School Accommodation Review Policy (S.09). Refer to Appendix ‘A’for a complete list of proposed school clusters and their associated completioncycles.

C. BACKGROUND

3. The Toronto Catholic District School Board and its predecessor Board, theMetropolitan Separate School Board, enjoy a rich history and tradition thatcan be traced to eras before Confederation. A great debt of gratitude is owedto the religious orders who fostered, nurtured and ensured the growth ofCatholic education in the city, as early as the 1840’s. Their living endowmentformed the roots of the system that has been inherited today.

4. In 1930, with Bishop Neil McNeil presiding, the offices of the TorontoCatholic District School Board (at the time MSSB) housed the first meetingsof what was to become the Ontario Separate School Trustees Association,now the Ontario Catholic School Trustees’ Association. The seventy yearhistory of this organization had its infancy in the Board’s Sherbourne Streetoffices.

5. Through collaborative efforts, the Board has continuously introduced policiesand programs to meet the needs of its community. Throughout the 1960s and1970s the Board and religious orders expanded the number of schools,expanded program beyond college preparation and moved into the era of co-education comprehensive school. In 1985, after Bill 30, rapid expansion tookplace, maturing to the present system known as the Toronto Catholic DistrictSchool Board.

6. Prior to the current funding model, the TCDSB had a limited realty tax baserelative the legacy public board in the City of Toronto. This lack of capitalfunding resulted in the establishment of small schools located on small sites.These inequities continue to this day.

Page 14 of 128

Guiding Principles

7. In 2007, and reaffirmed in 2011, as part of the TCDSB Long TermAccommodation and Program Plan (LTAPP), the Board approved a series ofGuiding Program and Planning Principles which staff are committed toupholding during any School Accommodation Review Process:

1. TCDSB affirms its denominational rights and strives to preserve aCatholic school presence in all communities. Strong program offeringsin all schools are seen as one of the cornerstones to achieving this goal.

2. The TCDSB Long Term Accommodation and Program Plan (LTAPP)recognizes the need to retain and strengthen religious ties andaffiliations with the local parish.

3. TCDSB will offer innovative and relevant programs that attract ourcommunity stakeholders, while ensuring that we collaborate with ourown Catholic neighbouring schools to differentiate our specialtyprogram offerings.

4. There is an interconnection within our TCDSB families of schools thatensures complementary programs, as well as seamless transition fromour elementary to our secondary schools.

5. TCDSB is committed to delivering a range and equity of programs, withinclusive opportunities for all students.

6. The LTAPP recognizes that our unique single gender schools will beretained, enhanced and expanded where viable.

7. TCDSB will give due consideration to the requirements of theAccessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act with all new decisionsregarding facility and program arising from the LTAPP process.

8. Local planning within TCDSB schools should be respectful of thesystem perspective – “Every school a great school.” (D. Hopkins)

9. Program identification within the TCDSB LTAPP process will includeconsultation with all key stakeholders and partners.

Page 15 of 128

10. TCDSB may implement its attendance boundary policy in an effort tobalance enrolment pressures across the system where required.

11. TCDSB schools will endeavour to ensure that all program foci selectedare sustainable over the long term, and have the flexibility to evolveover time.

12. Program and Facility design decisions informed by the TCDSB LTAPPwill be respectful of our environmental footprint.

13. Facilities and resources must be a consideration before programdecisions are finalized and the LTAPP should utilize and capitalizeupon TCDSB assets where practical.

14. Fiscal responsibility is necessary when arriving at a final programrecommendation, therefore a funding source must be identified for allpotential costs.

8. The Ministry of Education is supportive of the consolidation of schools inorder for school boards to achieve greater efficiencies, right-size schools andbalance enrolment. To this end, the Ministry has put in place variousinitiatives and supports to assist school boards.

9. On March 27, 2014, the Ministry of Education issued Memorandum 2014:B04Grants for Student Needs Funding and Regulations for 2014-15 whichhighlights the School Board Efficiencies and Modernization (SBEM)initiative. This initiative indicates reduced operating and maintenance fundingoverall, but articulates the need for more efficient use of school space andidentifies potential capital funding to support consolidations and right-sizingof school facilities.

10. On September 18, 2014, the Board of Trustees approved the report ‘Ministryof Education Memorandum 2014:B08: Request for School ConsolidationCapital Projects’. Only projects linked to completed School AccommodationReviews are to be considered for the available $750M in provincial funding.

11. There will be two further opportunities for Boards to apply for CapitalPriorities funding in the spring and the fall of 2015 for capital projects that

Page 16 of 128

address accommodation pressures, facility condition, and school consolidation.

12. On December 4, 2014, the Board of Trustees approved the report: ‘SchoolCapacity and Utilization: Ministry of Education Updates’. The reportidentifies and provides a summary of how school capacity has been impactedby recent Ministry program initiatives and changes resulting from the Board-approved capital program. The report further summarizes operational andprogram costs of schools.

D. EVIDENCE/RESEARCH/ANALYSIS

13. In keeping with the Ministry of Education’s Capital Priorities funding focuson projects promoting more efficient use of school space, criteria have beendeveloped by Board staff to evaluate and assess all elementary schools withexcess capacity and low or declining enrolment.

14. The criteria used in this analysis include the following:a) School capacityb) Projected enrolment trendsc) Current and projected facility utilization rated) Current and projected portable counte) Site sizef) Facility condition

Schools identified as candidates for potential consolidation were grouped with their surrounding schools to form “clusters”. These school clusters were then categorized into “completion cycles”. A completion cycle must be fully completed prior to the commencement of the next completion cycle.

15. Based on the requirements of the current School Accommodation ReviewPolicy (S.09), an individual review may be completed in 7 months (refer toAppendix ‘B’). However, based on the experience of School AccommodationReviews completed over the past decade, an individual review may takesignificantly more time to complete.

16. As directed by the Board, follow-up conversations with Trustees potentiallyimpacted by School Accommodation Reviews have occurred and haveresulted in some refinements to the resulting school groupings. Again, refer to

Page 17 of 128

Appendix ‘A’ for a complete list of proposed school clusters and their associated completion cycles.

17. The operating cost of low enrolment and/or schools with low utilization ratesis substantially greater on a per pupil basis than that of larger schools. 104 of169 TCDSB elementary schools generate insufficient per pupil grants to coverprogram and facilities-related costs, which equates to a Board shortfall ofapproximately $25M. The remaining 65 elementary schools generate moregrant than expenditure (approximately $16M) to help support the lowenrolment schools, but this surplus is insufficient to cover the entire shortfall.As a result, the Board is currently operating with a net shortfall ofapproximately $9M, which must be covered by other Board sources ofrevenue. This is further highlighted in Tables A, B, and C below.

Small Schools: Defined

18. Small schools can be defined by their Ministry rated operating capacity, or“On the Ground Capacity” (OTG). For the purposes of this report, schoolsless than and equal to 200 pupil places are considered “small”. 9 out of 168elementary schools fit this definition (Table A, below).

Small schools can also be defined by their enrolment. For the purposes of this report, schools with an enrolment less than or equal to 200 students are considered “small”. 30 out of 168 elementary schools fit this definition (Table B, below).

Lastly, small schools can also be defined by their utilization rate. For the purposes of this report, schools with a utilization rate of less than 50% of the Ministry rated capacity are considered “small”. 19 out of 168 elementary schools fit this definition (Table C, below).

Page 18 of 128

Table A: By

Capacity

Number of

Schools

Average Program/Facilities Cost per pupil**

Average Grant

per pupil

Average Program/Facilities

Cost Surplus/(Deficit) per pupil

<150 2* 12,527 9,818 (2,708) 151-200 7 9,928 9,012 (915) 201-250 17 10,019 9,110 (909) 251-300 17 9,756 8,941 (758)

>300 125 9,346 8,948 (399) Total 168

* St. Michael has a current capacity of 219 pp in its current location.** Grant and program costs are from 2013/2014 school year.

Table B: By

Enrolment

Number of

Schools


Cost per pupil

Average Grant

per pupil



<100 4 15,826 10,600 (5,226) 101-150 8 12,521 9,800 (2,721) 151-200 18 11,005 9,589 (1,416) 201-250 24 9,982 9,181 (801) 251-300 19 9,478 8,776 (701)

>300 95 8,599 8,712 112 Total 168

Table C: By Percent Utilization

Number of

Schools


Cost per pupil

Average Grant

per pupil



<35% 5 13,980 10,065 (3,914) 36-49% 14 12,013 9,529 (2,484)

50-59.9% 17 10,603 9,443 (1,160) 60-69.9% 17 10,053 9,243 (810)

>70% 115 8,773 8,754 (19) >75% 106 8,703 8,718 14 Total 168

Page 19 of 128

Potential Cost-Savings and Cost-Avoidance Opportunities

19. Through contributions from senior members of Planning, Finance, Facilities,and Human Resources, this section will detail potential staffing and facilities-related cost-savings and cost-avoidance opportunities resulting from threesample consolidation scenarios.

Overall, total potential cost-savings and cost-avoidance opportunities resultingfrom the analyses identified in comments #20 to #22 below are as follows:

Savings / Cost-Avoidance Total ($) Yearly Savings 2,345,526 One-Time Savings 417,000 One-Time Cost-Avoidance 12,346,009

20. The following analysis highlights a potential of $2.14M in staff cost-savingsgenerated through three sample consolidation scenarios. Note that the changesin staffing FTE can be potentially realized through overall system attrition,and do not necessarily correspond to the specific staff who populate a schoolthat may be consolidated.

SAR

C

Sam

ple

Scen

ario

A Staff Category Change in FTE Cost Savings $

Teacher -1.40 (135,382.30) Principal -1.00 (135,165.44) Caretaker -2.00 (132,192.00) Support Staff -3.20 (122,863.74)

Total -7.60 ($525,603.48)

SAR

C

Sam

ple

Scen

ario

B Staff Category Change in FTE Cost Savings $


Total -10.40 ($727,035.79)

SAR

C

Sam

ple

Scen

ario

C Staff Category Change in FTE Cost Savings $


Total -13.20 ($883,466.23)

Page 20 of 128

Note: the bulk of the savings for school Principal and Secretary accrue to the Province.

21. The following table details a number of planned renewal items for ScenarioSchool B and Scenario School C. Overall, a one-time cost-savings ofapproximately $417,000 can be realized if these sample facilities areconsolidated.

School Type of Work / Description

Year of Execution

Estimated Budget $

Scenario B Paint washrooms, stairwells, and second floor corridors

2016 50,000

Scenario B Replace carpet in library 2016 27,000 Scenario C Replace boiler (urgent) 2016 300,000 Scenario C Replace security system 2015 40,000

Total $417,000

The following table articulates utility cost-savings associated with the three sample scenarios. Overall, a yearly savings of $186,556 per year can be realized if these sample facilities are consolidated.

School Utility Cost $ (2014)

Expected Utility Savings $

Estimated Maintenance Savings/Year $

Expected Total Savings/Year $

Scenario A 45,498 22,749 20,000 42,749 Scenario B 49,578 24,789 15,000 39,789 Scenario C 68,036 34,018 70,000 104,018

Total $163,112 $81,556 $105,000 $186,556

The following table details annual grasscutting and snowplowing costs associated with the three sample scenarios. Overall, a yearly savings of $22,865 can be realized if these sample facilities are consolidated.

School Grasscutting $ Snowplowing $ Scenario A 2,775 4,200 Scenario B 2,190 5,900 Scenario C 2,900 4,900 Total $7,865 $15,000

Page 21 of 128

22. A significant cost-avoidance associated with school consolidation is deferred maintenance. Appendix ‘C’ provides an alphabetical list of all schools in the system and their associated deferred maintenance (5-year cumulative renewal needs) and FCI (Facility Condition Index) as per the Ministry facility database (TCPS). The following table provides the deferred maintenance associated with three sample scenarios. Overall, a cost-avoidance of $12.3M can be realized if these three sample facilities are consolidated.

School FCI (2019)

Estimated Deferred Maintenance 5-Year Cumulative Renewal $ (2019)

Scenario A 41% 4,260,585 Scenario B 38% 2,761,555 Scenario C 69% 5,323,869

Total $12,346,009

23. In addition to the sample cost-avoidance savings noted in comment #22 above, staff will also identify further cost-avoidance opportunities for the replacement of receiving schools considered “Prohibitive to Repair” (PTR). This analysis will form part of the Board’s comprehensive business case submission to the Ministry of Education for capital funding.

24. Another benefit of consolidation of space is that limited available renewal funding can be concentrated to make buildings barrier-free and accessible, and provide purpose-designed special needs rooms and washrooms. The current $24M in renewal funding is inadequate as it does not address the annual needs and as a result, the deferred maintenance backlog will continue to grow.

Research and Current Literature on Small Schools

25. Appendix ‘D’ provides a comprehensive analysis of the relationship between school size (enrolment) and student achievement. A summary of the research is presented below.

26. Looking at the impact of multiple sociological/demographic factors some

conclude that the relationship between poverty and low student achievement is significantly decreased in smaller schools; others find that once demographic factors were accounted for, there were no significant effects of school size on student achievement. There is also research demonstrating either no effect or a positive impact of small schools on school climate and student achievement, particularly for less affluent students.

Page 22 of 128

27. There is research looking at Grade 3 and Grade 6 EQAO results from 10Ontario school Boards that suggests there is no significant relationshipbetween school size and school achievement. It should be noted that it isEQAO’s policy not to report publicly any school with a cohort of less than 15students, as it is recognized that gains and losses can take on disproportionatesignificance, as one student can represent a significant percentage swing.Thus, caution should be taken when reviewing the EQAO scores from oursmall schools.

28. Overall, while the current literature on the subject of school size and studentachievement and student well-being remains inconclusive, when looking atthe EQAO results of the small schools selected for this report, there appears tobe a small positive relationship between enrolment and EQAO scores. Thatsaid, Research staff have also found a modest positive relationship betweenschool results and demographic factors. This relationship holds at the Grade 3and Grade 6 level. Consistent with the literature, this positive relationship isevident at the school level, but not the individual student level.

29. The bar charts in Appendix ‘D’ provide Grade 3 and Grade 6 EQAO readingand math results of the 20 lowest enrolment schools as compared to the Boardaverage. EQAO scores have been selected as a representative measure, as theyremain the only standardized provincial benchmark currently used to assessprogress in student achievement. That said, EQAO scores are a limitedsnapshot and many factors contribute to overall student success on an EQAOmeasure or any other measure we might use to assess program efficacy.

Program-Related Benefits of 400 to 600 Pupil Place Elementary Schools

30. There is general agreement and consensus among senior academic staff thatelementary schools in the range of 400 to 600 pupil spaces provide therequired ‘critical mass’ associated with program-related benefits for students.A number of program-related benefits have been identified with schools ofthis size. Fully utilized elementary schools of this size lead to increasedMinistry per pupil funding which in turn has the potential to generate thefollowing benefits.

School Organization and Program Implications An increase in the number of staffing allocations has the potential to enhance:

Page 23 of 128

1. Number of choices for student placement (e.g. accommodating sibling needs)

2. Access to more programs and services (e.g. Special Education Needs, French Immersion, Extended French Immersion, ESL, etc.)

3. Number of opportunities for block timetabling (for Literacy and Numeracy)

4. Number of opportunities for co-curricular and extra-curricular activities 5. More opportunities to staff the various school committees and select

subject representatives (e.g. Safe Schools Committee, Health Action Team, Eco School Rep, Religious Ed. Rep, Literacy Rep, Numeracy Rep, CSAC Staff Rep, etc.)

6. More fulsome celebrations of and participation in pivotal, significant school events, such as graduation, sacraments, overnight grade excursions, etc.

School Staffing and Program Implications An increase in the number of staffing allocations has the potential to enhance:

1. The Professional Learning Community (PLC) strategy (e.g. School Improvement Team, Collaborative Inquiry process, etc.)

2. Number of opportunities for team teaching 3. Matching individual subject areas with specialist qualifications 4. Mentoring

Material Resources and Equipment

1. Increased enrolment generates increased funding for the school and in turn has the potential to generate increased material resources and equipment (e.g. sports equipment, library materials, computer equipment, etc.).

2. Cost-savings from fewer school administration and support positions associated with smaller schools would support greater investment in resources and equipment.

Facilities and Program Implications

1. Increased enrolment generates increased funding for the school and has the potential to generate additional classroom space for specialty programs such as FSL, Music, Art, etc.

2. An increase in the facility area has the potential to generate additional programs and services such as Nutritional Programs, Before and After School Programs, Daycare, International Language Programs, etc.

Page 24 of 128

CSAC Involvement Increased enrolment provides a wider parental base and potential for increased parental involvement, the sharing of their talents and expertise and the development of community partnerships—a critical focus of the Ministry of Education.

31. Further to the advantages identified above, measureable criteria showing the

benefits of larger schools could be developed to support or demonstrate this relationship. Examples of potential criteria are identified below. Combined Grades While a lower percentage of combined grades is indicative of a larger school, primary class size caps and Collective Agreement caps will determine the necessity of a combined grade.

Support Staff Schools with higher enrolment will likely be eligible for a greater number of specialty support staff; for example, clerk typists and custodial support. More support from Education Assistants and Child Youth Workers is directly tied to the weighted exceptionalities of students with IEPs.

Librarians/Other Specialty Teachers Larger schools will likely lead to increased Teacher Librarians and fewer Library Technicians. There will be an overall net savings in the aggregate for Library staffing.

Attendance Boundary Reviews

32. On August 21, 2014, the Board of Trustees approved the report ‘Report regarding Elementary School Attendance Boundary Review Priority Ranking 2014’. The report recommended that the top three boundary reviews be approved, and that the remaining reviews be initiated in priority order as the proceeding reviews near completion. This report is found in Appendix ‘E’.

Appendix ‘F’ provides a list of the 15 elementary school clusters approved for attendance boundary review.

33. Staff have identified overlap between the proposed SARC clusters, as discussed above, and the attendance boundary review clusters as found in Appendix ‘E’.

Page 25 of 128

34. In consultation with the affected Trustees, staff recommend that the overlap orredundant schools be studied under the School Accommodation Reviewprocess, which would also include a comprehensive boundary review as aparallel process. This would eliminate duplication and the need for separateboundary reviews. Therefore, upon Board approval of the proposed SARCclusters, the following duplicate school clusters would no longer be requiredfor additional boundary study:

Cluster #2 Cluster #11 Cluster #14 Cluster #15 Holy Angels Blessed Trinity Christ the King Blessed Pier

Giorgio Frassati Our Lady of Sorrows

St. Gabriel St. Ambrose Sacred Heart

St. Louis St. Timothy St. Leo St. Bede St. Mark St. Teresa St. Gabriel

Lalemant The Holy Trinity*

Note: The Holy Trinity will accommodate students from Christ the King and St. Teresa.

35. The Ministry of Education has allocated $8.3M (Province-wide) to supportpolicy development and capacity building to undertake the planning andanalyses necessary to make more efficient use of school space. Board staffsubmitted a comprehensive proposal for funding necessary to secureadditional temporary staff to address School Accommodation Reviews andboundary reviews. Staff anticipate a Capital Planning Capacity (CPC) fundingresponse from the Ministry shortly. This funding source is in the “finalapprovals” stage.

36. Staff recommend the approval of the first “Completion Cycle” of SchoolAccommodation Reviews, as identified in this report, and bring back a futurereport that outlines the implementation schedule of the balance of the reviews.This will enable staff to incorporate the Ministry’s proposed changes to thePupil Accommodation Review Guidelines. These new guideline changes areanticipated early in 2015, and are expected to help streamline the process.

E. STAFF RECOMMENDATION

1. That the following School Accommodation Reviews be conducted inaccordance with School Accommodation Review Policy (S.09):

Page 26 of 128

Completion Cycle

Trustee School Cluster

1 Davis

Senhor Santo Cristo

St. Luke

Davis St. Bruno

St. Raymond

Andrachuk

Holy Angels Our Lady of Sorrows

St. Leo St. Louis

St. Mark

CLICK HERE TO ENTER TEXT. 2. That a future report be considered regarding the initiation of further

School Accommodation Reviews at the following schools:

2 Tanuan

Blessed Pier Giorgio Frassati Sacred Heart

St. Bede St. Gabriel Lalemant

Tanuan Prince of Peace St. Rene Goupil

The Divine Infant

Del Grande Kennedy

Holy Redeemer Our Lady of Guadalupe

St. Matthias St. Timothy

3 Poplawski

St. Luigi St. Rita

St. Sebastian

Crawford Immaculate Heart of Mary St. Theresa Shrine

Del Grande Rizzo

Blessed Trinity St. Agnes

St. Gabriel

Page 27 of 128

3. That the following overlap boundary reviews, as described in comment #34 of this report, be studied as part of the School Accommodation Review process:





Lalemant The Holy

Trinity

Page 28 of 128

Completion Cycle 1 Trustee

Superintendent

School Cluster

School Capacity

(pupil places)

Site Size

(acres)

Oct 2014

Enrol.

2016-17 Projected Enrolment

2016-17 Projected % Utilization

Options for School Accommodation Review Committee (SARC) Consideration

Senhor Santo Cristo 507 1.43 100 103 20%

St. Luke 571 1.93 238 231 40%

St. Bruno 380 1.58 97 102 27%

St. Raymond 584 1.88 159 189 32%

Holy Angels 372 2.94 411 398 107%

Our Lady of Sorrows* 568 4.23 786 765 135%

St. Leo 459 1.95 251 253 55%

St. Louis 358 1.46 215 181 51%

St. Mark 266 2.32 211 277 104%

Blessed Pier Giorgio Frassati

490 2.97 243 293 60%

Sacred Heart 396 3.51 240 224 57%

St. Bede 475 2.97 161 151 32%

St. Gabriel Lalemant 219 3.81 190 194 89%

Prince of Peace 323 2.99 345 322 100%

St. Rene Goupil 251 2.99 113 110 44%

The Divine Infant 306 3.01 156 153 50%

Holy Redeemer 210 4.00 82 81 39%

Our Lady of Guadalupe 176 2.99 163 214 122%

St. Matthias 219 4.00 188 189 86%

St. Timothy* 556 8.88 554 598 108%

St. Luigi 424 4.99 194 193 46%

St. Rita 421 2.22 109 126 30%

St. Sebastian 550 2.79 265 296 54%

3

2

2

2

1

1

1

Saraco

Saraco

Davis

Davis

Andrachuk

1. Consolidate St. Sebastian and St. Rita students at St. Luigi.2. Consolidate St. Rita students at St. Luigi, plus new program considerations.

1. Consolidate St. Gabriel Lalemant students at St. Bede and SacredHeart, through the judicious use of boundaries.2. Consolidate St. Bede students at St. Gabriel Lalemant and SacredHeart, through the judicious use of boundaries.Note: This School Accommodation Review will eliminate the need for a separate boundary review. Therefore, a review of boundaries will be required for this study.

1. Consolidate St. Rene Goupil students at Prince of Peace and The Divine Infant, through the judicious use of boundaries.2. Consolidate The Divine Infant students at Prince of Peace and St. Rene Goupil, through the judicious use of boundaries.

1. Consolidate Senhor Santo Cristo students at St. Luke.2. Status quo, plus new program considerations.

1. Consolidate St. Bruno students at St. Raymond.2. Status quo, plus new program considerations.

1. Consolidate St. Louis students at St. Leo. Some students may be redistributed to St. Mark based on home address.2. Status quo, plus new program considerations at St. Leo and St. Louis.Note: Our Lady of Sorrows added to this School Accommodation Review to eliminate the need for a separate boundary review. Therefore, a review of boundaries will be required for this study.

1. Consolidate Holy Redeemer and Our Lady of Guadalupe students at St.Matthias.2. Consolidate Holy Redeemer students at St. Matthias.Note: St. Timothy added to this School Accommodation Review to eliminate the need for a separate boundary review. Therefore, a review of boundaries will be required for this study.

Poplawski

Tanuan

Tanuan

Del GrandeKennedy

Saraco

D'Avella

Yack

Shain

D'Avella

APPEN

DIX

'A'

Page 29 of 128

Completion Cycle 1 Trustee

Superintendent

School Cluster

School Capacity

(pupil places)

Site Size

(acres)

Oct 2014

Enrol.

2016-17 Projected Enrolment

2016-17 Projected % Utilization

Options for School Accommodation Review Committee (SARC) Consideration

Immaculate Heart of Mary

305 1.83 180 183 60%

St. Theresa Shrine 369 3.43 208 200 54%

Blessed Trinity 378 4.99 167 154 41%

St. Agnes 210 4.87 281 256 122%

St. Gabriel 452 6.52 334 394 87%

Note 1: A completion cycle must be fully completed prior to the commencement of the next completion cycle.

3

3

1. Consolidate Immaculate Heart of Mary students at St. Theresa Shrine, as part of a future redevelopment with Blessed Cardinal Newman.2. Study St. St. Theresa Shrine as part of a future redevelopment withBlessed Cardinal Newman.

1. Consolidate Blessed Trinity students at St. Anges and St. Gabriel, though the judicious use of boundaries.2. Consolidate Blessed Trinity students at St. Agnes, though the judicious use of boundaries.

Crawford

Del GrandeRizzo

Shain

Grant

APPEN

DIX

'A'

Page 30 of 128

EARLIEST TIMELINES FOR A SCHOOL ACCOMMODATION REVIEW

January 22, 2015 Board approves and initiates accommodation review.

January 23, 2015 Notification letter to school communities (minimum 30 day notification period prior to first public meeting).

February 23, 2015 Earliest day for first public meeting (minimum 90 days required for public consultation consisting of minimum of 4 public meetings).

June 2, 2015 Last day for public consultation (minimum of 4 public meetings).

June 25, 2015 Last day of school. ARC submits report to Director of Education.

June 30, 2015 ARC report received by DC and referred to staff.

September 8, 2015 Start of new school year.

September 13, 2015 Notification letter to school communities (minimum 60 days notification prior to meeting at which Trustees can make a final decision regarding accommodation review).

September 17, 2015 Director’s first report to CASPPC.

October 15, 2015 CASPPC meeting for public input.

November 11, 2015 End of 60 day notification period.

November 12, 2015 CASPPC meeting to consider public input, and final decision by Trustees.

Note: Spring, summer and Christmas breaks are not to be considered part of the minimum timerequirements.

APPENDIX 'B'Page 31 of 128

School Name Trustee 2019FCI (%)

2019 Estimated Deferred Maintenance 5-year (Cum.) Renewal Needs ($)

All Saints 01 - Joseph Martino 4.5 491,080Annunciation 11 - Angela Kennedy 52.4 3,256,526Blessed Margherita 04 - Patrizia Bottoni 36.4 2,541,281Blessed Pier Giorgio Frassati 08 - Garry TanuanBlessed Sacrament 05 - Maria Rizzo 66.5 5,900,412Blessed Trinity 07 - Michael Del Grande 102.7 7,733,787Canadian Martyrs 11 - Angela Kennedy 34.2 2,668,760Cardinal Leger 08 - Garry Tanuan 25.3 2,492,603Christ the King 02 - Ann Andrachuk 58.8 4,009,397D'Arcy McGee 05 - Maria Rizzo 63.9 8,831,514Epiphany of Our Lord Academy 07 - Michael Del Grande 56.6 2,943,687Father Serra 01 - Joseph Martino 54.8 3,761,315Holy Child 01 - Joseph MartinoHoly Angels 02 - Ann Andrachuk 29.9 2,817,362Holy Cross 11 - Angela Kennedy 51.7 4,555,637Holy Family 10 - Barbara Poplawski 45.3 5,862,963Holy Name 11 - Angela Kennedy 43.0 4,489,038Holy Redeemer 07 - Michael Del Grande 44.6 2,421,051Holy Rosary 09 - Jo-Ann Davis 63.9 4,071,814Holy Spirit 07 - Michael Del Grande 64.7 4,864,194Immaculate Conception 03 - Sal Piccininni 3.4 344,809Immaculate Heart of Mary 12 - Nancy Crawford 40.4 2,391,200James Culnan 10 - Barbara Poplawski 78.9 8,551,354Josyf Cardinal Slipyj 02 - Ann Andrachuk 37.5 3,607,720Mother Cabrini 02 - Ann Andrachuk 43.8 2,382,233Msgr John Corrigan 01 - Joseph Martino 52.3 2,977,422Nativity of Our Lord 02 - Ann Andrachuk 36.8 3,475,295Our Lady of Fatima 12 - Nancy Crawford 3.2 390,309Our Lady of Grace 08 - Garry Tanuan 35.6 2,126,162Our Lady of Guadalupe 11 - Angela Kennedy 46.9 1,838,073Our Lady of Lourdes 09 - Jo-Ann Davis 4.5 580,596Our Lady of Peace 02 - Ann Andrachuk 27.2 2,677,668Our Lady of Perpetual Help 09 - Jo-Ann Davis 64.1 3,745,417Our Lady of Sorrows 02 - Ann Andrachuk 5.6 570,644

Source: EDU SFIS databaseAPPENDIX 'C'Page 32 of 128



Our Lady of the Assumption 05 - Maria Rizzo 57.4 2,642,048Our Lady of Victory 06 - Frank D'Amico 7.1 925,966Our Lady of Wisdom 07 - Michael Del Grande 68.4 4,086,306Pope Paul 06 - Frank D'Amico 39.6 3,284,682Precious Blood 07 - Michael Del Grande 54.4 5,152,219Prince of Peace 08 - Garry Tanuan 56.1 3,827,255Regina Mundi 05 - Maria Rizzo 80.0 5,500,015Sacred Heart 08 - Garry Tanuan 33.9 2,638,184Santa Maria 06 - Frank D'Amico 50.0 2,958,942Senhor Santo Cristo 09 - Jo-Ann Davis 40.9 4,260,585St Michael 09 - Jo-Ann Davis 67.0 1,897,269St Agatha 12 - Nancy Crawford 25.3 2,236,251St Agnes 07 - Michael Del Grande 40.5 2,118,900St Aidan 07 - Michael Del Grande 47.5 3,709,682St Albert 07 - Michael Del Grande 35.2 1,846,617St Alphonsus 09 - Jo-Ann Davis 70.4 6,948,050St Ambrose 02 - Ann AndrachukSt Andrew 01 - Joseph Martino 54.1 6,041,524St Angela 01 - Joseph Martino 62.4 6,653,630St Anselm 11 - Angela Kennedy 60.0 4,192,367St Anthony 10 - Barbara Poplawski 3.8 352,999St Antoine Daniel 05 - Maria Rizzo 45.1 2,331,992St Augustine of Canterbury 04 - Patrizia Bottoni 69.3 4,841,120St Barbara 12 - Nancy Crawford 70.8 5,106,938St Barnabas 08 - Garry Tanuan 37.0 3,008,893St Bartholomew 08 - Garry Tanuan 122.7 4,616,431St Bede 08 - Garry Tanuan 28.8 2,469,448St Benedict 01 - Joseph Martino 84.3 8,563,116St Bernard 03 - Sal Piccininni 20.3 2,551,593St Bonaventure 05 - Maria Rizzo 45.7 2,589,362St Boniface 12 - Nancy Crawford 60.8 3,753,857St Brendan 08 - Garry Tanuan 71.7 6,097,644St Brigid 11 - Angela Kennedy 58.3 7,822,252St Bruno 09 - Jo-Ann Davis 68.5 5,323,869

Source: EDU SFIS databaseAPPENDIX 'C'

Page 33 of 128



St Catherine 11 - Angela Kennedy 71.6 2,525,800St Cecilia 10 - Barbara Poplawski 67.1 7,311,531St Charles 05 - Maria Rizzo 42.9 3,226,794St Charles Garnier 04 - Patrizia Bottoni 31.0 3,302,331St Clare 06 - Frank D'Amico 90.3 9,866,351St Clement 02 - Ann Andrachuk 41.1 2,802,721St Columba 08 - Garry Tanuan 48.9 3,954,334St Conrad 04 - Patrizia BottoniSt Cyril 05 - Maria Rizzo 78.4 4,634,615St Demetrius 01 - Joseph Martino 32.6 1,785,204St Denis 11 - Angela Kennedy 79.2 4,648,773St Dominic Savio 08 - Garry Tanuan 15.2 1,134,518St Dorothy 01 - Joseph Martino 40.3 4,957,985St Dunstan 12 - Nancy Crawford 67.3 4,865,592St Edmund Campion 12 - Nancy Crawford 72.3 3,758,961St Edward 05 - Maria RizzoSt Elizabeth 02 - Ann Andrachuk 75.0 3,000,613St Elizabeth Seton 08 - Garry Tanuan 33.9 2,013,670St Eugene 01 - Joseph Martino 72.3 3,591,377St Fidelis 03 - Sal Piccininni 41.6 3,131,493St Florence 08 - Garry Tanuan 54.2 3,065,245St Francis de Sales 03 - Sal Piccininni 43.5 4,093,150St Francis of Assisi 09 - Jo-Ann Davis 14.5 1,081,842St Francis Xavier 03 - Sal Piccininni 35.2 3,569,939St Gabriel 05 - Maria Rizzo 63.8 5,407,793St Gabriel Lalemant 08 - Garry Tanuan 39.8 1,975,789St Gerald 11 - Angela Kennedy 54.9 4,128,631St Gerard Majella 03 - Sal Piccininni 71.4 3,246,206St Gregory 02 - Ann Andrachuk 27.7 2,943,634St Helen 10 - Barbara Poplawski 34.7 5,527,346St Henry 07 - Michael Del Grande 25.4 1,898,857St Ignatius of Loyola 08 - Garry Tanuan 82.4 4,048,511St Isaac Jogues 11 - Angela Kennedy 43.8 2,899,152St James 10 - Barbara Poplawski 80.4 5,113,513

Source: EDU SFIS databaseAPPENDIX 'C' Page 34 of 128



St Jane Frances 04 - Patrizia Bottoni 9.1 1,185,473St Jean de Brebeuf 08 - Garry Tanuan 48.1 2,524,203St Jerome 04 - Patrizia Bottoni 58.6 4,956,941St Joachim 12 - Nancy Crawford 19.0 1,470,230St John 11 - Angela Kennedy 53.2 7,135,965St John Bosco 06 - Frank D'Amico 56.8 4,275,596St John the Evangelist 06 - Frank D'AmicoSt John Vianney 01 - Joseph Martino 54.4 4,912,775St John XXIII 11 - Angela Kennedy 36.9 3,363,477St Joseph 11 - Angela Kennedy 87.9 6,204,912St Jude 03 - Sal Piccininni 45.0 5,521,976St Kateri Tekakwitha 11 - Angela Kennedy 39.5 1,877,897St Kevin 07 - Michael Del Grande 45.7 2,490,311St Lawrence 07 - Michael Del Grande 51.9 3,921,626St Leo 02 - Ann Andrachuk 71.9 6,338,467St Louis 02 - Ann Andrachuk 38.1 2,761,555St Luigi 10 - Barbara Poplawski 80.1 13,083,250St Luke 09 - Jo-Ann Davis 41.1 4,483,842St Malachy 08 - Garry Tanuan 67.5 3,368,788St Marcellus 01 - Joseph Martino 51.0 3,955,316St Margaret 05 - Maria Rizzo 72.6 4,486,721St Marguerite Bourgeoys 08 - Garry Tanuan 32.7 1,698,468St Maria Goretti 12 - Nancy Crawford 24.0 3,260,966St Mark 02 - Ann Andrachuk 36.2 2,066,047St Martha 04 - Patrizia Bottoni 74.3 4,229,196St Martin De Porres 12 - Nancy Crawford 64.2 3,963,020St Mary 09 - Jo-Ann Davis 84.2 8,465,820St Mary of the Angels 06 - Frank D'Amico 64.2 5,998,799St Matthew 03 - Sal Piccininni 59.7 4,835,330St Matthias 11 - Angela Kennedy 45.1 2,448,541St Maurice 01 - Joseph Martino 33.1 2,718,951St Michael's Choir Jr 258.9 7,940,356St Monica 05 - Maria Rizzo 83.2 5,114,422St Nicholas 12 - Nancy Crawford




St Nicholas of Bari 06 - Frank D'Amico 52.7 5,575,802St Norbert 04 - Patrizia Bottoni 35.5 2,185,967St Paschal Baylon 05 - Maria Rizzo 56.0 3,820,794St Paul 09 - Jo-Ann Davis 63.9 5,822,793St Philip Neri 03 - Sal Piccininni 78.5 5,681,860St Pius X 10 - Barbara Poplawski 31.7 2,755,410St Raphael 04 - Patrizia Bottoni 50.4 3,912,930St Raymond 09 - Jo-Ann Davis 85.6 9,636,021St Rene Goupil 08 - Garry Tanuan 47.8 2,605,505St Richard 12 - Nancy Crawford 75.4 5,145,964St Rita 10 - Barbara Poplawski 106.0 8,876,511St Robert 04 - Patrizia Bottoni 10.6 998,811St Roch 03 - Sal Piccininni 54.4 3,937,076St Rose of Lima 12 - Nancy Crawford 62.4 5,077,327St Sebastian 10 - Barbara Poplawski 61.2 8,529,618St Simon 03 - Sal Piccininni 49.3 2,692,844St Stephen 01 - Joseph Martino 41.2 4,517,616St Sylvester 07 - Michael Del Grande 82.3 2,797,450St Teresa 02 - Ann Andrachuk 71.5 4,219,899St Theresa Shrine 12 - Nancy Crawford 76.2 4,331,370St Thomas Aquinas 05 - Maria Rizzo 90.6 9,278,228St Thomas More 12 - Nancy Crawford 33.2 3,104,934St Timothy 11 - Angela Kennedy 3.1 314,399St Ursula 12 - Nancy Crawford 51.2 2,089,397St Victor 12 - Nancy Crawford 81.4 4,424,933St Vincent de Paul 10 - Barbara Poplawski 56.2 5,906,448St Wilfrid 04 - Patrizia Bottoni 60.3 7,785,373St. Josaphat 02 - Ann AndrachukStella Maris 06 - Frank D'Amico 46.3 11,642,000Sts Cosmas and Damian 05 - Maria Rizzo 29.2 1,739,899The Divine Infant 08 - Garry Tanuan 39.6 2,616,737Transfiguration 01 - Joseph Martino 97.3 6,033,256Venerable John Merlini 03 - Sal Piccininni 61.2 4,277,545Total: 652,627,553


TCDSB Educational Research

School Size – Summary of Research January, 2015

APPENDIX ‘D’

RESEARCH BRIEF School Size – Summary of Research

I - BACKGROUND

Much of the history of discussions of school size has focussed two distinct issues: (i) the relation between school size and economic efficiency, and (ii) the relation between school size and student outcomes. Frequently, discussions offset issues of positive school climate made available in smaller schools with the significantly reduced per-pupil operating costs in larger schools. Discussions of secondary school size also introduce issues of programs and services made available only in larger schools.

Major policy movements in the United States in the 20th Century have led to a slow but steady increase in elementary and secondary school sizes:

“As a result, during the past seventy-five years in the United States thenumber of school buildings has decreased from almost 250,000 toapproximately 95,000 (Kennedy, 2003). At the same time the K-12public school enrollment has risen from about 28,000,000 students toover 53,000,000.” (Stevenson, 2006)

In Ontario, the trend appears to be somewhat different: “In Ontario, the population of school-age children has been declining

for more than a decade. The average school size has dropped from 879students per secondary school in 2001, to 775 this year. In elementaryschool, the average school size in 1998 was 365 students; this year it is329.” (People for Education, 2013)

The Ontario Ministry of Education School Board Efficiencies and Modernization policy appears to attempt to offset this trend in Ontario.

II – RESEARCH SUMMARY

The issue of ideal school size and the relationship between school size and school effectiveness has been long debated in the research literature. Much of this literature focusses on secondary schools. Research reported by Hattie

Page 37 of 128



APPENDIX ‘D’

(2009) suggests that there is a moderate but significant relation between secondary school size and student outcomes, and that neither too small nor too large secondary schools are most effective. Hattie reports that the ideal size of secondary schools appears to be between 600 and 900 students, allowing schools to provide a more comprehensive curriculum than smaller schools, maintain close personal relationships and an intimate school climate, and yet, taking advantage of economies of scale to reduce per pupil operating costs.

In terms of elementary school size, there is a trend in current policy to favour smaller schools. In terms of research, there are several trends in current elementary school size literature:

(i) research indicating that there is no significant relationship between school size and student achievement,

(ii) research discussing the combined impact of multiple sociological/demographic factors on student achievement, including school size,

(iii) research demonstrating the efficiency of cost effectiveness of larger schools, and

(iv) research demonstrating the positive impact of small schools on school climate and student achievement (particularly for less affluent students).

(i) Research Indicating That There Is No Significant Relationship Between School Size And Student Achievement The most compelling research arguing for a limited relation between elementary school size and student achievement, is the work recently published by Kerry Reimer Jones and Anthony Nnajiofor Ezeife. In their 2011 study, Jones and Ezeife examined Ontario Grade 3 and Grade 6 EQAO results from 10 Ontario school Boards. Jones and Ezeife report that “overall, there was no statistically significant correlation between school size and student achievement.” Despite this overall claim, the authors did find several trends in the data, favouring large or medium sized schools, including:

“The mean percentage of students achieving at stipulated provincial standards in Grade three writing and in Grade six reading, writing and mathematics were highest in large-sized schools (schools with more than 420 students). Results further indicated that the mean percentage of students performing above

Page 38 of 128



APPENDIX ‘D’

provincial standards in Grade six reading and writing was also highest in large schools. Students in medium- sized schools (between 246 and 420 students) also had the highest mean percentage of students performing above provincial standards in Grade three writing and in Grade six mathematics.” (Jones and Ezeife, 2011)

(ii) Research Discussing The Combined Impact Of Multiple Sociological/Demographic Factors On Student Achievement (Including School Size) A large number of studies in the past 20 years have examined student achievement in small schools, in the context of other sociological/demographic factors, including, student age and socio-economic status. Most researchers have concluded that the relationship between poverty and low student achievement is significantly decreased in smaller schools and that poorer students produce increasing lower results in larger schools (Howley, 1995; Howley, Strange, & Bickel, 2000; Abbott, Joireman & Stroh, 2002; Bickel, Howley, Williams & Glascock, 2001; Caldas, 1993; Franklin & Crone, 1992). Some researchers have also examined student age, finding that elementary aged students appear to benefit from smaller schools, whereas secondary aged students benefit from larger schools (Friedkin and Necochea, 1988; Texas Education Agency,1999). Canadian Researchers have examined the effects of school size, controlling for socio-economic status (Lytton, & Pyryt, 1998; Ma, & Klinger, 2000). In both cases, the researchers found that once demographic factors were accounted for, there were no significant effects of school size on student achievement. American studies have confirmed these findings – both Caldas (1993) and Lamdin (1995) found that the factor most significant in predicting elementary student achievement was student poverty (including family socio-economic status and percent of students receiving subsidized lunches).

(iii) Research Demonstrating The Efficiency Of Cost Effectiveness Of Larger Schools Historically, researchers have argued that economies of scale provide for greater program offerings, and reduced operating costs per student, leading to greater student achievement (Conant, 1956; McGuffey, & Brown, 1979). Some have suggested, however, that these economies of scale may be limited

Page 39 of 128



APPENDIX ‘D’

– i.e., after a certain point, there is no greater savings in per student operating costs (Gooding and Wagner, 1985; Hattie, 2009)

(iv) Research Demonstrating The Positive Impact Of Small Schools On School Climate And Student Achievement Leithwood and Jantzi (2009) have summarized several empirical articles examining the impact of school size on student achievement. The authors concluded that in all studies reviewed, there were no effects, or the effects favoured smaller elementary schools – that is, at least at the elementary level, smaller schools maximize student performance. Abalde (2014) came to similar conclusions, finding for the OECD, that at the elementary level, smaller schools appear to have greater evidence for increased student achievement.

The Public Schools of North Carolina, State Board of Education (2000) found similar results – findings are not conclusive, however where there are differences in achievement, student behaviour, and school climate, data in each case favour smaller schools.

Recently, in the state of Florida, the private government watchdog, Florida TaxWatch, examined this issue and concluded that smaller schools had a greater effect than small classrooms on student behaviour, participation in extracurricular activities, and overall student achievement (2014).

III – TCDSB DATA Tables 1 and 2 contain data for schools identified in the main report. Data include Grade 3 and Grade 6 EQAO Reading and Mathematics results for 2013-2014 as well as 3 year averages. Table 1 lists student achievement for schools identified in the Small School Matrix. Table 2 lists schools for schools identified in the sample.

A review of the data provided indicates that student achievement in the small schools is comparable to Board results in terms of Grade 3 Reading – approximately half of the schools have a greater percent of students at or above the provincial standard than the Board (both for 2013-3014 and the three year average). Grade 6 Reading results for 2013-3014 are similar. However, more than half of the smaller schools have a greater percent of students above the Board average for Grade 3 Mathematics (‘13-14), Grade 6

Page 40 of 128



APPENDIX ‘D’

Mathematics (’13-14), Grade 3 Mathematics (3 year average) and Grade 6 Reading and Mathematics (3 year average).

This data appear to indicate that in the small schools identified in the main report, students are achieving somewhat better than the Board average.

Table 1: TCDSB Small Schools (in ascending order of October 2014 enrolment)

School

Enrolment (Oct. 2014)

EQAO 2013-14

Grade 3

EQAO 2013-14 Grade 6

Rolling Average

Gr. 3 (2012 - 2014)

Rolling Average

Gr. 6 (2012 - 2014)

Read ing

Math Read ing

Math Read ing

Math Read ing

Math

Provincial 70 67 79 54 68 67 77 56 TCDSB 70 66 74 53 68 67 72 55 Holy Redeemer 82 80 80 100 71 65 79 84 58

St Bruno 97 100 71 71 57 81 66 77 73 St Marguerite Bourgeoys

99 70 80 69 69 69 75 80 78

Senhor Santo Cristo

100 89 89 100 71 96 85 71 63

St Bartholomew

108 60 40 64 64 68 56 73 60

St Rita 109 56 67 80 20 51 51 71 32 St Catherine 110 78 67 75 75 69 72 80 63

St Rene Goupil 113 64 82 92 50 63 73 88 63

St Elizabeth Seton

142 64 50 53 33 56 50 57 53

Page 41 of 128



APPENDIX ‘D’

Epiphany of Our Lord

147 91 73 64 71 74 82 73 71

St Ignatius of Loyola 148 63 63 65 59 65 69 68 65

St Michael 151 45 50 100 80 56 56 76 59 The Divine Infant 156 90 80 92 69 85 87 96 64

St Raymond 159 73 73 67 33 58 58 67 55

St Florence 160 61 61 60 33 59 58 75 53

St Bede 161 39 48 47 53 52 55 56 49 Our Lady of Guadalupe

163 80 67 57 57 88 76 58 42

St Josaphat 164 73 92 83 90 73 83 83 88

St Francis of Assisi 165 94 83 73 40 73 69 64 45

Blessed Trinity 167 70 70 76 47 71 69 71 52

Page 42 of 128



APPENDIX ‘D’

Table 2: TCDSB Sample Schools (by size category and in ascending order of October 2014 enrolment)

School

Enrolment (Oct. 2014)

EQAO 2013-14

Grade 3

EQAO 2013-14

Grade 6

Rolling Average -

Gr. 3 (2012 - 2014)

Rolling Average -

Gr. 6 (2012 - 2014)

Read ing

Math Read ing

Math Read ing

Math Read ing

Math

Provincial 70 67 79 54 68 67 77 56 TCDSB 70 66 74 53 68 67 72 55 Holy Redeemer 82 80 80 100 71 65 79 84 58

St Bruno 97 100 71 71 57 81 66 77 73 St Marguerite Bourgeoys

99 70 80 69 69 69 75 80 78

Senhor Santo Cristo

100 89 89 100 71 96 85 71 63

St Bartholomew

108 60 40 64 64 68 56 73 60

St John XXIII 362 88 67 83 55 65 54 69 50

Holy Angels 411 100 98 78 53 96 92 84 67

Nativity of Our Lord 424 68 73 87 79 66 74 76 71

James Culnan 431 60 56 52 40 73 63 50 38

St Jerome 443 56 42 77 37 64 59 78 48 St Charles Garnier 448 66 31 59 24 47 36 48 26

Precious Blood 450 71 71 84 47 79 71 76 44

Page 43 of 128



APPENDIX ‘D’

Immaculate Conception

451 63 52 63 55 51 46 68 61

St Simon 453 69 65 81 41 65 68 73 40 St Stephen 454 56 56 54 24 55 57 56 24

St Albert 456 78 65 78 52 70 65 71 54 St Helen 471 62 68 75 62 62 66 78 62 St Conrad 484 71 55 71 44 57 49 64 41 St Pius X 489 85 83 92 79 81 81 87 74 Our Lady of Fatima 722 70 63 87 50 71 65 79 56

St Jane Frances 749 49 42 57 26 56 55 49 24

Our Lady of Sorrows 786 92 90 91 77 85 89 83 76

All Saints 879 77 78 87 59 76 78 81 69 St Maria Goretti 1010 65 56 78 63 65 63 81 65

Page 44 of 128

71

57

6971

64

20

75

50

33

71

59

80

69

33 33

53

57

90

40

47

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

% o

f St

ud

ents

at

LEve

l 3 o

r 4

Schools

Grade 3 EQAO Mathematics -- 3 Year Average (2012-2014)Percent of Students at Level 3 or 4

TCDSB 20 Small Schools(Note: 12 of 20 schools are above the Board average)

BoardAverage:53%

APPEN

DIX

'D'

Page 45 of 128

100

7169

100

64

80

75

92

53

64 65

100

92

67

60

47

57

83

7376

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

% o

f St

ud

ents

at

Leve

l 3 o

r 4

Schools

Grade 3 EQAO Reading -- 3 Year Average (2012-2014)Percent of Students at Level 3 or 4


BoardAverage:74%

APPEN

DIX

'D'

Page 46 of 128

58

73

78

6360

32

63 63

53

71

65

59

64

5553

49

42

88

45

52

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

% o

f St

ud

ents

at

Leve

l 3 o

r 4

Schools

Grade 6 EQAO Mathematics -- 3 Year Average (2012-2014)Percent of Students at Level 3 or 4


Board Average:55%

APPEN

DIX

'D'

Page 47 of 128

84

7780

7173

71

80

88

57

73

68

76

96

67

75

5658

83

64

71

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

% o

f St

ud

ents

at

Leve

l 3 o

r 4

Schools

Grade 6 EQAO Reading -- 3 Year Average (2012-2014)Percent of Students at Level 3 or 4


BoardAverage:72%

APPEN

DIX

'D' Page 48 of 128

ACTION AFTER REGULAR BOARD AUGUST 21, 2014

NAME OF REPORT Report regarding Elementary School Attendance Boundary Review

Priority Ranking 2014

COMMITTEE Regular Board

DATE OF MEETING August 21, 2014

STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO BOARD

1. That the priority ranking of attendance boundary reviews, as shown in Appendix 'A' be approved.

2. That the initiation of the top three attendance boundary reviews be approved:

1) St. Paschal Baylon, St. Antoine Daniel and St. Cyril; 2) Our Lady of Sorrows, St. Mark, Holy Angels, St. Louis; 3) St. Martin De Porres, St. Malachy, St. Brendan

3. That the remaining boundary reviews be initiated in priority order as the preceding

reviews near completion.

BOARD ACTION/DIRECTIONS

1. That the priority ranking of attendance boundary reviews, as shown in Appendix 'A' be approved.

2. That the initiation of the top three attendance boundary reviews be approved:

1) St. Paschal Baylon, St. Antoine Daniel and St. Cyril.

2) Our Lady of Sorrows, St. Mark, Holy Angels, St. Louis

3) St. Martin De Porres, St. Malachy, St. Brendan


reviews near completion. 4. That Trustees be consulted on the groupings in their areas.

DELEGATED TO J. Volek to implement recommendations

Item 4 -Consult with Trustees regarding proposed school groupings

APPENDIX ‘E’

Page 49 of 128

PUBLIC

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ATTENDANCE BOUNDARY REVIEW PRIORITY RANKING 2014 "Count it all joy, my brothers, when you meet trials of various kinds, for you know that the testing of your faith produces steadfastness. And let steadfastness have its full effect, that you may be perfect

and complete, lacking in nothing.n James 1:2-4

Joseph Ruscitti, Sr. Manager, Planning Services and Admissions John Volek, Sr. Coordinator, Planning, Accountability and Admissions

RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Vision: At Toronto Catholic we transform the world through witness, faith, innovation and action.

G. Poole Associate Director of Academic Affairs

Mission: The Toronto Catholic District Schoof Board is an inclusive learning community rooted in the love of Christ. We educate students to grow in grace and knowledge and to lead lives of faith, hope and charity.

A. Sangiorgio Associate Director of Planning and Facilities

S. Pessione Associate Director of Business Services, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Angela Gauthier Director of Education

REGULAR BOARD

APPENDIX ‘E’

Page 50 of 128

A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This report recommends that the priority ranking of boundary reviews (as shown in Appendix 'A ') and the initiation of the first group of reviews (Group A), be approved.

B. PURPOSE

As a result of changes in demographics, implementation of Full Day Early Learning Kindergarten (FDK) and recently completed capital constrnction, there is need to review and update the October 18, 2012 Board approved Attendance Boundary Review Priority Ranking. Staff have completed five boundary reviews in the past year and have identified families of schools in a priority ranking to be considered for the next series of reviews.

Approval of a new priority ranking for the elementary school attendance boundary reviews is required prior to initiation of the next series of reviews.

C. BACKGROUND

I . At is meeting on October 18, 2012, the Board approved an Attendance Boundary Review Priority Ranking (Appendix 'B ') and the initiation of the first two groups of reviews, Group 'A' and Group 'B'. Along with approval of staff recommendations the Board made amendments to the priority ranking submitted by staff as follows:

"4. That thefollowing ranking of item #10 be included with Group 'A': Bishop Allen, Don Bosco, Father John Redmond, and klichael Power/St. Joseph.

5. That the review of Our Lady of Lourdes and St. Paul be added to Group 'B' as #9and that this review begin after the Group B reviews are complete."

Over the past year, staff have completed the boundary reviews identified in Group 'A' of the October 18, 2012 report. Also, the public consultation part of the boundary review process has been completed for the Eastern Rite schools. The reporting and Board approvals part of the process will start in September 2014.

2. At its meeting of June 5, 2014, the Corporate Affairs, Strategic Planning and PropertyCommittee approved a motion by Tmstee Andrachuk (8b) part of which was to reviewthe boundaries of all schools in Central Etobicoke. Resulting from this motion, staff wererequested to review all schools with an updated set of criteria to determine areas ofgreatest need where an attendance boundary could resolve emolment pressures andcapacity related issues.

3. Initiation of an attendance boundary review will be in accordance with the ElementarySchool Attendance Boundary Review Policy (S.A.03).

APPENDIX ‘E’

Page 51 of 128

4. Upon Board approval of the revised Admissions Policy for both E l e m e n ta r y and Secondary schools, a policy concerning Secondary school attendance boundary reviews will be submitted to Board for approval. Subsequently, a priority ranking of Secondary school boundary reviews will be developed and submitted to Board for approval.

D. EVIDENCE/RESEARCH/ANAL YSIS

1. The Ministry of Education has renewed its' focus to better utilize all school buildings in

the province, and have allocated $8.3 million to support policy development and capacity building to undertake the planning necessary to make more efficient use of their space. This funding will be targeted to boards that have consolidation opportunities and may not have adequate planning capacity. TCDSB will submit a proposal to secure a portion of this funding to hire two or three additional staff members to address boundary reviews, school accommodation reviews and asset management strategies.

2. Criteria have been developed by staff to evaluate and assess all elementary schools to identify areas of enrolment pressure or capacity deficiency that can be alleviated through implementation of an attendance boundary. This criteria differs slightly from the criteria applied in the October 18, 2012 report as the original set of criteria were meant to identify building and facility issues.

3. The criteria used in this analysis are as follows: o School Size o Site Size o School Utilization Rate o School Utilization Rate assuming Students already within FDK Catchment o Projected enrolment trends o Portable Count o Transportation Student/Stop Differential o Transportation Cost

4. Based on a comprehensive evaluation of all elementary schools, the top schools were grouped with their surrounding schools to form clusters. These clusters were then ranked based on the combined Utilization Rate of the group, taking into consideration any current or planned fonded capital projects. The clusters appear in Appendix 'A' in their Priority Ranked order.

5. This report seeks approval of the rank ordering of school reviews, as well as approval to initiate the first three boundary reviews, which consist of the following clusters:

1) St. Paschal Baylon, St. Antoine Daniel and St. Cyril; 2) Our Lady of Sorrows, St. Mark, Holy Angels and St. Louis; 3) St. Martin De Porres, St. Malachy and St. Brendan.

6. Some clusters may require a capital solution as well as boundary adjustment to effectively solve their enrolment pressure issues. A new listing of Capital Priorities will be presented in a report to Board in Fall 2014. As with past priority lists, business cases will be submitted to the Ministry of Education to request fonding to support capital solutions. Boundary review recommendations will be considered and can assist in presenting a case for funding.

APPENDIX ‘E’

Page 52 of 128

7. Based on available resources and experience gained from recent boundary reviews, i t is the opinion of staff that no more than a total of three attendance boundary reviews should be initiated/in progress at any given time. When a review nears completion, the next review in the ranking would be ini tiated. The "Completion Cycles" aiiiculated in Appendix 'A' assume an increased staff complement. If the Board is unable to hire additional staff as per Comment # 1 above these cycles may not be met.

8. In order that the initiation of attendance boundary reviews not be unduly delayed, it is suggested that the priority ranking order be approved at the August 2014 Board meeting. In accordance with the Elementary School Attendance Boundary Review Policy, a minimum of 30 days must be allowed prior to the first public meeting once the Board has approved and announced a boundary review. Scheduling public meetings between October and December provides sufficient time for the Boundary Review Committee (BRC) to complete its repo1i and for staff to complete the reporting process and obtain the required Board approvals between January and March to allow for the implementation of the attendance boundary in September of that school year.

E. ACTION PLAN

9. Subject to Board approval of the priority ranking and initiation of attendance boundary

reviews (Appendix 'A'), letters will be prepared for distribution to the school communities of the first three clusters of schools informing them of the initiation of the review process and the timelines and procedures involved.

10. Superintendents and Tmstees of each school group will be contacted by Planning staff to

review the process and procedures as well as to review materials related to the boundary review in their area.

11. Superintendents will then establish the Boundary Review Committees in accordance with

the Elementary School Attendance Boundary Review Policy (S.A.03).

F. STAFF RECOMMENDATION

1. That the priority ranking of attendance boundary reviews, as shown in Appendix 'A ', be approved.

2. That the initiation of the top tln·ee attendance boundary reviews be approved:

'1) St. Paschal Baylon, St. Antoine Daniel and St. Cyril; 2) Our Lady of Sorrows, St. Mark, Holy Angels, St. Louis; 3) St. Martin De Porres, St. Malachy, St. Brendan.


reviews near completion.

APPENDIX ‘E’

Page 53 of 128

ATTENDANCE BOUNDARY REVIEW PRIORITY RANKING

St. Antoine Daniel

St. CyrilSt. MarkHoly AngelsSt. LouisSt. MalachySt. BrendanBlessed SacramentOur Lady of the AssumptionSt. Robert

St. Edward

St. LawrenceSt. AlbertSt. JoachimSt. NicholasSt. AgathaSt. UrsulaNativity of Our LordMother CabriniSt. Marcellus

1002

1

St. Boniface

St. Paschal Baylon

CrawfordTanuan1086

Iuliano-MarrelloShain

BottoniRizzo

Rizzo

CrawfordDel Grande

92%16231755 AndrachukMartinoYack

1504

1502 98%

107%

1248

Crawford

3

Iuliano-Marrello

Grant108%

GrantD'Avella

2

1471

St. Margaret

Grant

Shain

7

2194 2227

1403

116%

6

4

109%

Rizzo

*Com

plet

ion

Cyc

le

SO

s

Trus

tees

Yack Andrachuk1486 1621

UTIL. (%)

Pupil CountOTG

Cluster School identified with

pressures

Our Lady of Sorrows

St. Martin de Porres

St. Norbert

St. Maria Goretti

8

5

102%

1286 103%

St. Gregory

1410

Clu

ster

1 1213

Adjacent Schools

APPEN

DIX

'F'

Page 54 of 128

ATTENDANCE BOUNDARY REVIEW PRIORITY RANKING

*Com

plet

ion

Cyc

le

SO

s

Trus

teesUTIL. (%)

Pupil CountOTG

Cluster School identified with

pressures

Clu

ster

Adjacent Schools

9 St. Kateri Tekakwitha St. Gerald 572 493 86% Shain Kennedy

St. RichardSt. Rose of Lima

St. Gabriel

Blessed TrinitySt. PaulOur Lady of Lourdes

13 St. Edmund Campion St. Thomas More 721 541 75% Grant Crawford

Christ the KingSt. TeresaSt. AmbroseSt. LeoSt. BedeSacred HeartBlessed Pier Giorgio Frassati

*Each Completion Cycle requires 4 to 8 months to complete depending on available staff resources

3

CrawfordGrant

Del Grande KennedyShain

Holy Trinity

211321369

85%

986

15 1539 862 56%

1214

11

10

Shanahan Davis

14 1427 1052

81%

St. Timothy

St. Michael12

D'Avella Tanuan

Yack Andrachuk

83%

St. Gabriel Lalemant

11621360

74%

St. Victor

APPEN

DIX

'F'

Page 55 of 128

of 52

MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CORPORATE AFFAIRS, STRATEGIC PLANNING

AND PROPERTY COMMITTEE

HELD THURSDAY, JANUARY 22, 2015

PUBLIC SESSION PRESENT: J. Martino, Chair S. Piccininni A. Andrachuk P. Bottoni – by teleconference N. Crawford F. D’Amico J.A. Davis M. Del Grande A. Kennedy B. Poplawski – by teleconference M. Rizzo G. Tanuan

A Gauthier A. Sangiorgio G. Poole P. Matthews

P. De Cock M. Puccetti R. McGuckin C. Fernandes L. Notten D. Yack J. Yan L. Fernandes, Recording Secretary

of 52

3

Michelle Nolden, representing St. Leo Catholic School addressed the Committee regarding Revitalization Update and thanks to the Board.

MOVED by Trustee Andrachuk, seconded by Trustee Piccininni, that the presentation by Michelle Nolden, representing St. Leo Catholic School regarding Revitalization Update and thanks to the Board be received.

CARRIED

MOVED by Trustee Crawford, seconded by Trustee Piccininni, that item 9a) be adopted as follows:

9a) School Accommodation Review Priority Ranking

1. That the following School Accommodation Reviews be conducted inaccordance with School Accommodation Review Policy (S.09)

Completion Cycle Trustee School Cluster

1

Davis Senhor Santo Cristo St. Luke

Davis St. Bruno St. Raymond

Andrachuk Holy Angels Our Lady of Sorrows St. Leo St. Louis St. Mark

of 52

4

2. That a future report be considered regarding the initiation of furtherSchool Accommodation Reviews at the following schools:

Completion Cycle Trustee School Cluster

2 Tanuan

Blessed Pier Giorgio Frassati Sacred Heart St. Bede St. Gabriel Lalemant

Tanuan Prince of Peace St. Rene Goupil The Divine Infant

Del Grande Kennedy

Holy Redeemer Our Lady of Guadalupe St. Matthias St. Timothy

3 Poplawski

St. Luigi St. Rita St. Sebastian

Crawford Immaculate Heart of Mary St. Theresa Shrine

Del Grande Rizzo

Blessed Trinity St. Agnes St. Gabriel

3. That the following overlap boundary reviews, as described incomment #34 of this report, be studied as part of the SchoolAccommodation Review process:

of 52

5





Lalemant The Holy Trinity

MOVED in AMENDMENT by Trustee Andrachuk, seconded by Trustee Rizzo, to add the words “as may be amended by future Board resolution” to part 1 of the Motion.

On the vote being taken on the Amendment, as follows:

In favour Opposed

Trustees Andrachuk Rizzo D’Amico Piccininni Martino Bottoni Poplawski Del Grande Tanuan Davis Kennedy Crawford

The Amendment was declared

CARRIED

of 52

6

On the vote being taken, on the Motion, as Amended, as follows:

In favour Opposed

Trustees Andrachuk Trustee Rizzo D’Amico Piccininni Martino Bottoni Poplawski Del Grande Tanuan Davis Kennedy Crawford

The Motion, as Amended was declared

CARRIED

MOVED by Trustee Rizzo, seconded by Trustee Davis, that item 12b) be adopted as follows:

12b) Communication from CSAC of St. Agnes Catholic School regarding Changes to the CSAC Policy – referred to the Board meeting dealing with the CSAC Policy.

CARRIED

The Chair reviewed the Order Paper Items.

The following items were questioned:

St. Mark Catholic SchoolTrustee Ward: Ward 02 ‐ Ann Andrachuk

Superintendent Area: Area 2 ‐ Doug YackSQS Area: Area 2 ‐ Jose Couto

City Ward: Etobicoke‐Lakeshore (5)EDC Review Area: CE0145 Cloverhill Rd, Toronto, M8Y 1T4

October 31st Enrolment OTG Capacity

School programs

Facility Characteristics

Facility Condition Index (FCI)

Current Enrolment and Utilization Rate

Historical Enrolment

Projected Enrolment

Number of Stories: 2Site Size: 0.94 Acres2.32

Gross Floor Area: 3,603 SQ Feet38,782Year Built: 1992

Additions: ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

Playground Equipment: No

HectaresSQ Metres

Addition 1 Addition 2 Addition 3 Addition 4

t EDU Inspection : 2012

1) The Ministry is conducting condition assessments of all schools. The inspections began in 2011 and facilities will be assessed over a five‐year period. The Ministry last conducted condition assessments in 2002‐03.2) Based on condition assessment findings, the Ministry of Education calculates five‐year renewal needs and replacement value to determine the Facility Condition Index (FCI).

3) Based on Pupil Count (all JK/SK at 1.0) Trillium Extract, October 31, 2014.4) OTG is based on 2014‐2015 capacities.

Current Utilization Portables0

2009‐10 2010‐11 2011‐12 2012‐13 2009‐10 2010‐11 2011‐12 2012‐13

Historical October Pupil Count (All JK/SK at 1.0)

Historical OnSIS Approved Average Daily Enrolment (ADE)

Historical EnrolmentUtilization Rate

2015‐16 2016‐17 2021‐22 2023‐24 2025‐26 2027‐28Projected October Pupil Count

Utilization Rate

5) 2015‐16 to 2017‐18 are Board Approved Projections. 2021‐22 to 2027‐28 are projections provided by Board consultant.

Eco School Certification:Transportation: No Regular Home‐to‐School; No Kindergarten; Special Need

Before After Program: Yes

Other Programs: NutritionBest Start Program: Yes

School Program: JK – Grade 8

5‐Year Renewal Needs Range: 2012‐2016EDU Comparable FCI (%) : 19.9

210 211 210 198 195 188 184 173

225 234 303 316 321 332

78.9% 79.3% 78.9% 74.4% 73.2% 70.6% 69.0% 65.1%

84.6% 87.9% 113.9% 118.4% 120.7% 124.8%

79.3%

3 4

1

2

5

266211

2017‐1825294.7%

2013‐1417465.3%

Child Care Program: Yes

2013‐1419974.8%

Accessibility Status: AccessibleBF Parking Space: Yes

Ramp Entry: YesAuto Door Opener: Yes

Elevator: YesBF Washroom: Yes

For more information, please visit the School Website: Last Updated: 21‐Apr‐15 TCDSB Planning And Accountabilityhttp://stmark.tcdsb.org

St. Louis Catholic SchoolTrustee Ward: Ward 02 ‐ Ann Andrachuk


City Ward: Etobicoke‐Lakeshore (5)EDC Review Area: CE0111 Morgan Ave, Toronto, M8Y 2Z7


School programs





Projected Enrolment



Additions: 1966 1991 1994 ‐

Playground Equipment: Yes

HectaresSQ Metres






2009‐10 2010‐11 2011‐12 2012‐13 2009‐10 2010‐11 2011‐12 2012‐13





Utilization Rate


Eco School Certification:Transportation: Regular Home‐to‐School; Kindergarten; Special Needs

Before After Program: No

Other Programs: GiftedBest Start Program: No



197 209 203 199 181 191 179 182

228 235 235 238 235 231

55.0% 58.4% 56.7% 55.6% 50.5% 53.4% 50.0% 50.8%

63.7% 65.6% 65.6% 66.5% 65.6% 64.5%

60.1%

3 4

1

2

5

358215

2017‐1824267.6%

2013‐1417348.2%

Child Care Program: No

2013‐1419153.4%

Accessibility Status: PartialBF Parking Space: Yes

Ramp Entry: YesAuto Door Opener: No

Elevator: NoBF Washroom: No

For more information, please visit the School Website: Last Updated: 21-Apr‐15 TCDSB Planning And Accountabilityhttp://stlouis.tcdsb.org

St. Leo Catholic SchoolTrustee Ward: Ward 02 ‐ Ann Andrachuk


City Ward: Etobicoke‐Lakeshore (6)EDC Review Area: CE01165 Stanley Ave, Toronto, M8V 1P1


School programs





Projected Enrolment



Additions: 1958 1963 1976 ‐

Playground Equipment: No

HectaresSQ Metres






2009‐10 2010‐11 2011‐12 2012‐13 2009‐10 2010‐11 2011‐12 2012‐13





Utilization Rate


Eco School Certification:Transportation: Regular Home‐to‐School; No Kindergarten; Special Needs

Before After Program: No

Other Programs: PFLCBest Start Program: No



261 260 273 260 246 237 245 237

244 255 287 313 314 318

56.9% 56.6% 59.5% 56.6% 53.5% 51.6% 53.3% 51.6%

53.1% 55.6% 62.5% 68.2% 68.4% 69.3%

54.5%

3 4

1

2

5

459250

2017‐1825856.3%

2013‐1422649.2%


2013‐1424954.2%



Elevator: NoBF Washroom: Yes

For more information, please visit the School Website: Last Updated: 21‐Apr‐15 TCDSB Planning And Accountabilityhttp://stleo.tcdsb.org

Our Lady of Sorrows Catholic SchoolTrustee Ward: Ward 02 ‐ Ann Andrachuk


City Ward: Etobicoke‐Lakeshore (5)EDC Review Area: CE0132 Montgomery Road, Toronto, M8X 1Z4


School programs





Projected Enrolment



Additions: ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐


HectaresSQ Metres


t EDU Inspection : 2002‐03




2009‐10 2010‐11 2011‐12 2012‐13 2009‐10 2010‐11 2011‐12 2012‐13





Utilization Rate


Eco School Certification:Transportation: Regular Home‐to‐School; Kindergarten; Special Needs


Other Programs: GiftedBest Start Program: No


5‐Year Renewal Needs Range: 2003‐2007EDU Comparable FCI (%) :

673 674 692 733 622 626 645 667

781 796 817 824 868 913

124.2% 124.4% 127.7% 135.2% 114.8% 115.5% 119.0% 123.0%

144.1% 146.9% 150.7% 152% 160.1% 168.5%

145.0%

3 4

1

2

5

542786

2017‐18787

145.2%

2013‐14682

125.8%


2013‐14746

137.6%


Ramp Entry: NoAuto Door Opener: Yes

Elevator: YesBF Washroom: Yes

For more information, please visit the School Website: Last Updated: 21‐Apr‐15 TCDSB Planning And Accountabilityhttp://ourladyofsorrows.tcdsb.org

Holy Angels Catholic SchoolTrustee Ward: Ward 02 ‐ Ann Andrachuk


City Ward: Etobicoke‐Lakeshore (5)EDC Review Area: CE0165 Jutland Rd, Toronto, M8Z 2G6


School programs





Projected Enrolment



Additions: 1964 1991 1995 ‐


HectaresSQ Metres






2009‐10 2010‐11 2011‐12 2012‐13 2009‐10 2010‐11 2011‐12 2012‐13





Utilization Rate


Eco School Certification: SilverTransportation: Regular Home‐to‐School; Kindergarten; Special Needs


Other Programs: NoneBest Start Program: No



339 357 367 381 307 321 332 346

426 450 462 443 403 363

91.1% 96.0% 98.7% 102.4% 82.6% 86.4% 89.1% 92.9%

114.5% 120.9% 124.2% 119.1% 108.3% 97.5%

110.2%

3 4

1

2

5

372410

2017‐18469

126.1%

2013‐1433790.5%


2013‐14372

100.0%



Elevator: No 2nd FloorBF Washroom: Yes

For more information, please visit the School Website: Last Updated: 21‐Apr‐15 TCDSB Planning And Accountabilityhttp://holyangels.tcdsb.org

School Name Holy Angels Our Lady of Sorrows St. Leo St. Louis St. Mark Total 02 ‐ Ann Andrachuk 02 ‐ Ann Andrachuk 02 ‐ Ann Andrachuk 02 ‐ Ann Andrachuk 02 ‐ Ann Andrachuk

336.75 680.00 226.00 172.50 173.75 1589.00233,875$ 409,059$ 189,490$ 185,618$ 185,708$ 1,203,750$

2,099,524$ 4,293,883$ 1,693,219$ 1,224,953$ 1,371,648$ 10,683,227$ 277,101$ 559,551$ 241,142$ 184,652$ 174,325$ 1,436,769$

2,610,500$ 5,262,493$ 2,123,850$ 1,595,222$ 1,731,681$ 13,323,746$ 369,398$ 429,521$ 195,289$ 195,289$ 195,289$ 1,384,786$

1,997,083$ 4,148,500$ 2,041,080$ 1,455,697$ 1,562,523$ 11,204,883$ 2,366,481$ 4,578,022$ 2,236,369$ 1,650,986$ 1,757,812$ 12,589,670$ 136,859$ 260,776$ 179,016$ 148,818$ 142,099$ 867,568$ 17,635$ 34,272$ 26,096$ 15,723$ 20,160$ 113,884$ 49,513$ 96,224$ 73,270$ 44,144$ 56,602$ 319,752$ 35,270$ 68,543$ 52,192$ 31,445$ 40,319$ 227,769$ 29,843$ 57,998$ 44,162$ 26,607$ 34,116$ 192,727$ 269,120$ 517,813$ 374,736$ 266,737$ 293,295$ 1,721,701$ 7,827$ 7,494$ 11,554$ 11,117$ 11,805$ 9,007$7,752$ 7,739$ 9,398$ 9,248$ 9,967$ 8,385$‐25100 166658 ‐487254 ‐322501 ‐319427 ‐987624

‐75 245 ‐2156 ‐1870 ‐1838 ‐622Deficit Surplus Deficit Deficit Deficit

1,648,320$ 570,644$ 3,786,049$ 1,528,980$ 1,135,770$ 8,669,763$ 121,145$ 296,858$ 153,507$ 95,181$ 92,235$ 758,926$

TrusteeADE (Average Daily Enrolment)Grant ‐ Admin Prin/VP/Secr/Sch OfficeGrant ‐ Teachers & Other StaffGrant ‐ School Operations & School Top‐upTotal GrantExpenditures ‐ Admin Prin/VP/Secr/Sch OfficeExpenditures ‐ Teachers & Other StaffTotal Program CostCustodian Salary BenefitsOperations Costs (Caretaking Supplies, Etc)UtilitiesMaintenance CostsSchool Operation AdminTotal Operations Cost PAG (Pupil Accommodation Grant)Program Cost per Pupil (Prog Cost+Oper Cost)/ADEGrant per pupil Grant/ADE (Average Daily Enrolment)Program / Operating Surplus or Deficit excluding Deferred Maintenance Grant‐(Prog Cost+Oper Cost)

Program/Opera ng Surplus or Defici tper pupilDeficit or Surplus

Es mated Deferred Maintenance 5‐year (Cumula ve) Renewal Needs

Transportation CostTransportation Grant 107,499$ 263,419$ 136,216$ 84,460$ 81,845$ 673,438$

Financial Summary ‐ Holy Angels, Our Lady of Sorrows, St. Leo, St. Louis, St. Mark

$$ $

$ $$

$

$$$

$

$

Holy Angels CS, Building ID7147-1

Replace the building automation system Validation Survey2011-2015

67.01High 2014 $193,800.00 $193,800.00D3060 Controls & Instrumentation -Johnson Controls (Metasys)


Replace the control air supply system (aircompressor, air receiver tank and air dryer)

Validation Survey2011-2015

67.01High 2014 $10,200.00 $204,000.00D3060 Controls & Instrumentation -Control Air Supply System


Perform intrusive testing of the hot waterdistribution systems in the c.1960 and c.1964building areas to determine the internal conditionof the water piping


62.01High 2015 $8,160.00 $212,160.00D304003 Heating/Chilling waterdistribution systems - (Heating)


Replace the hot water distribution systems in thec.1960 and c.1964 building areas if warranted bythe results of the recommended study


62.01High 2016 $209,100.00 $421,260.00D304003 Heating/Chilling waterdistribution systems - (Heating)


Replace all original (VAT) and (VCT) floor tilesthroughout the school.


61.01High 2014 $229,500.00 $650,760.00C3020 Floor Finishes - Vinyl FloorTiles


Replace all concrete and aspahlt pavedwalkways throughout the school.


57.01High 2014 $96,900.00 $747,660.00G2030 Pedestrian Paving


Replace all acoustic tile ceilings. Validation Survey2011-2015

57.01High 2014 $102,000.00 $849,660.00C3030 Ceiling Finishes - Acoustictiles


Replace all Library clerestory windows. Validation Survey2011-2015

56.01High 2014 $45,900.00 $895,560.00B2020 Exterior Windows


Major Repair B 2010 Exterior Walls Validation Survey2011-2015

56.01High 2014 $30,600.00 $926,160.00B2010 Exterior Walls


Replace the hot water heating system terminalunits in the c.1960 and c.1964 building areaswhen the heating system hot water piping isreplaced


54.01High 2016 $71,400.00 $997,560.00D3050 Terminal & Package Units


Replace the domestic water distribution systemsif warranted by the results of the recommendedstudy


48.01Medium 2016 $147,900.00 $1,145,460.00D2020 Domestic Water Distribution


Perform intrusive testing of the domestic waterdistribution systems to determine the internalcondition of the water piping



Asset Brief Description Data OriginPriorityValue

Priority Year Cost Cumulative Cost

Printed On: 2015/03/03

Element

Event Listing By Descending Event Priority (2014 - 2023)

Toronto Catholic District School Board Page 1 of 3

Holy Angels

Toronto Catholic District School Board

Renewal Work by Priority


Replace the carpet flooring in the staff offices. Validation Survey2011-2015

46.01Medium 2016 $25,500.00 $1,179,120.00C3020 Floor Finishes - CarpetFlooring


Repair the cracked terrazzo flooring washroom138 and the hallway.


46.01Medium 2015 $35,700.00 $1,214,820.00C3020 Floor Finishes - TerrazzoRepairs


Replace rooftop exhaust fans EF1, EF2, EF3and the rooftop cube exhaust fan


44.01Medium 2014 $13,260.00 $1,228,080.00D304007 Exhaust Systems


Replace the millwork in the classrooms, library,washrooms and staff rooms, in the original andAddition 1 portions of the school.


44.01Medium 2016 $132,600.00 $1,360,680.00C1030 Fittings - Millwork


Replace the suspended acoustic panel ceilingsthroughout the school.


42.01Medium 2016 $86,700.00 $1,447,380.00C3030 Ceiling Finishes - SuspendedAcoustic Panel Ceilings


Repair the cracked and settled asphalt pavedparking lot surface.


42.01Medium 2015 $25,500.00 $1,472,880.00G2020 Parking Lots


Replacement [D4020 Standpipe Systems] Board Inspection 40.61Medium 2017 $34,662.00 $1,507,542.00D4020 Standpipe Systems


Replace the painted wall coverings throughoutthe school.


40.01Medium 2016 $91,800.00 $1,599,342.00C3010 Wall Finishes - Painted WallCoverings


Replacement B201008 Exteriror Soffits Validation Survey2011-2015

34.01Medium 2014 $71,400.00 $1,670,742.00B201008 Exterior Soffits


Replace power distribution panels "C" and "D" Validation Survey2011-2015

30.61Medium 2014 $12,240.00 $1,682,982.00D501005 Panels


Replacement [D302005 Auxiliary Equipment -Chemical Feed System]

Board Inspection 24.61Low 2017 $7,582.00 $1,690,564.00D302005 Auxiliary Equipment -Chemical Feed System


Replacement Validation Survey2011-2015

22.61Low 2017 $40,000.00 $1,730,564.00D3060 Controls & Instrumentation -Pneumatic Controls


Functional Events [F106003 Library ResourceCentre ]

Validation Survey2003

20.61Low 2014 $0.00 $1,730,564.00F106003 Library Resource Centre


Replacement [G204005 Signage] Validation Survey2011-2015

20.61Low 2017 $10,832.00 $1,741,396.00G204005 Signage


Replacement [D2020 Domestic WaterDistribution]


18.61Low 2017 $4,500.00 $1,745,896.00D2020 Domestic Water Distribution



18.61Low 2017 $50,000.00 $1,795,896.00D503099 Other Communications &Alarm Systems - Network


Replacement [C3020 Floor Finishes] Board Inspection 16.61Low 2018 $54,160.00 $1,850,056.00C3020 Floor Finishes




Element




Functional Events [F106007 General PurposeRoom]


16.61Low 2014 $0.00 $1,850,056.00F106007 General Purpose Room


Replacement [C1030 Fittings - Millwork] Validation Survey2011-2015

14.61Low 2017 $205,808.00 $2,055,864.00C1030 Fittings - Millwork


Replacement [C1030 Fittings] Validation Survey2011-2015

14.61Low 2017 $21,664.00 $2,077,528.00C1030 Fittings & Equipment


Replacement [C1030 Fittings - WindowCoverings]

Board Inspection 14.61Low 2018 $43,328.00 $2,120,856.00C1030 Fittings - Window Coverings


Replacement [D502001 Branch Wiring] Validation Survey2011-2015

14.61Low 2017 $458,194.00 $2,579,050.00D502001 Branch Wiring


Replacement [D503004 Public AddressSystems]


14.61Low 2017 $45,000.00 $2,624,050.00D503004 Public Address Systems


Replacement [D503008 Security Systems] Validation Survey2011-2015

14.00Low 2017 $20,000.00 $2,644,050.00D503008 Security Systems


Replacement [C1020 Interior Doors] Board Inspection 12.61Low 2017 $70,408.00 $2,714,458.00C1020 Interior Doors


Replacement [C3010 Wall Finishes] Board Inspection 10.61Low 2018 $75,824.00 $2,790,282.00C3010 Wall Finishes


Replacement [G2050 Landscaping] Validation Survey2011-2015

4.61Low 2017 $27,080.00 $2,817,362.00G2050 Landscaping


Replacement [B2030 Exterior Doors] Board Inspection -1.00N/A 2020 $21,664.00 $2,839,026.00B2030 Exterior Doors


Replacement [C1030 Fittings - WashroomsAccessories]

Board Inspection -1.00N/A 2023 $24,914.00 $2,863,940.00C1030 Fittings - WashroomsAccessories


Replacement [D303099 Other CoolingGenerating Systems - DX Split AHU-Cool]


-1.00N/A 2020 $15,000.00 $2,878,940.00D303099 Other Cooling GeneratingSystems - DX Split AHU-Cool


Replacement [D502002 Lighting Equipment] Validation Survey2011-2015

-1.00N/A 2021 $22,747.00 $2,901,687.00D502002 Lighting Equipment


Replacement [G204007 Playing Fields] Board Inspection -1.00N/A 2020 $16,248.00 $2,917,935.00G204007 Playing Fields


Replacement [B2030 Exterior Doors - AutomaticDevice]

Board Inspection -1.00N/A 2020 $25,997.00 $2,943,932.00B2030 Exterior Doors - AutomaticDevices




Element



Our Lady of SorrowsCatholic School , Building ID11069-1

Replacement [D4030 Fire Protection Specialties- Original Building]

Board Inspection 70.01High 2014 $16,248.00 $16,248.00D4030 Fire Protection Specialties -Original Building


Replacement [G204005 Signage - Site] Board Inspection 50.01High 2015 $12,998.00 $29,246.00G204005 Signage - Site


Replacement [D2020 Domestic WaterDistribution - Original Building]

Board Inspection 48.01Medium 2014 $12,998.00 $42,244.00D2020 Domestic Water Distribution -Original Building


Replacement [D503099 Other Communications& Alarm Systems - Original Building]

Board Inspection 48.01Medium 2014 $32,496.00 $74,740.00D503099 Other Communications &Alarm Systems - Original Building


Replacement [C3020 Floor Finishes - OriginalBuilding - Library, Offices]

Board Inspection 46.01Medium 2014 $83,406.00 $158,146.00C3020 Floor Finishes - OriginalBuilding - Library, Offices


Replacement [C3010 Wall Finishes - OriginalBuilding]

Board Inspection 40.01Medium 2014 $86,656.00 $244,802.00C3010 Wall Finishes - OriginalBuilding


Replacement [B2030 Exterior Door Hardware -Entire Bld.]

Board Inspection 24.61Low 2017 $9,749.00 $254,551.00B2030 Exterior Door Hardware - EntireBld.


Replacement [B2030 Exterior Doors - AutomaticDevices - Orig. Bld.]

Board Inspection 24.61Low 2017 $25,997.00 $280,548.00B2030 Exterior Doors - AutomaticDevices - Orig. Bld.


Replacement [D502002 Lighting Equipment -Original Building]

Board Inspection 22.61Low 2017 $27,080.00 $307,628.00D502002 Lighting Equipment -Original Building


Replacement [D3060 Controls &Instrumentation]

Routine Data Entry 22.61Low 2017 $130,866.00 $438,494.00D3060 Controls & Instrumentation


Functional Events [F106003 Library ResourceCentre - Original Building]

Model 20.61Low 2014 $0.00 $438,494.00F106003 Library Resource Centre -Original Building




Element



Our Lady of Sorrows



11069-1


Functional Events [F106004 Science Laboratory- Original Building]

Model 20.61Low 2014 $0.00 $438,494.00F106004 Science Laboratory -Original Building



Board Inspection 18.61Low 2017 $6,499.00 $444,993.00D2020 Domestic Water Distribution -Original Building


Replacement [C3020 Floor Finishes - OriginalBuilding - Boiler Rm, Storage]

Board Inspection 16.61Low 2017 $12,998.00 $457,991.00C3020 Floor Finishes - OriginalBuilding - Boiler Rm, Storage


Functional Events [F106007 General PurposeRoom - Original Building - Gymnasium]

Model 16.61Low 2014 $0.00 $457,991.00F106007 General Purpose Room -Original Building - Gymnasium


Replacement [C1030 Fittings - WashroomAccessories - Orig Bld]

Board Inspection 14.61Low 2017 $32,496.00 $490,487.00C1030 Fittings - WashroomAccessories - Orig Bld


Replacement [C1020 Interior Door Hardware -Entire Bld.]

Board Inspection 12.61Low 2017 $32,496.00 $522,983.00C1020 Interior Door Hardware - EntireBld.


Replacement [C3030 Ceiling Finishes - OriginalBuilding]

Board Inspection 12.61Low 2017 $6,499.00 $529,482.00C3030 Ceiling Finishes - OriginalBuilding


Replacement [G204007 Playing Fields - Site] Board Inspection 10.61Low 2017 $14,082.00 $543,564.00G204007 Playing Fields - Site


Replacement [C1010 Partitions - Moveable -GYM, Classroom (one)]

Board Inspection -1.00N/A 2022 $34,662.00 $578,226.00C1010 Partitions - Moveable -GYM,Classroom(one)


Replacement [C1030 Fittings - Millwork - EntireBld]

Board Inspection -1.00N/A 2022 $235,054.00 $813,280.00C1030 Fittings - Millwork - Entire Bld


Replacement [C3010 Wall Finishes - OriginalBuilding - Washrooms]

Board Inspection -1.00N/A 2022 $181,978.00 $995,258.00C3010 Wall Finishes - OriginalBuilding - Washrooms


Replacement [C3020 Floor Finishes - OriginalBuilding - Classrooms]

Board Inspection -1.00N/A 2022 $285,965.00 $1,281,223.00C3020 Floor Finishes - OriginalBuilding - Classrooms


Replacement [C3020 Floor Finishes - OriginalBuilding - GYM]

Board Inspection -1.00N/A 2022 $113,736.00 $1,394,959.00C3020 Floor Finishes - OriginalBuilding - GYM




Element



11069-1


Replacement [C1030 Fittings - WindowCoverings - Orig Bld]

Board Inspection -1.00N/A 2020 $48,744.00 $1,443,703.00C1030 Fittings - Window Coverings -Orig Bld



Board Inspection -1.00N/A 2022 $10,832.00 $1,454,535.00D2020 Domestic Water Distribution -Original Building



Board Inspection -1.00N/A 2022 $16,248.00 $1,470,783.00D2020 Domestic Water Distribution -Original Building


Replacement [D502002 Lighting Equipment -Original Building]

Board Inspection -1.00N/A 2020 $21,664.00 $1,492,447.00D502002 Lighting Equipment -Original Building


Replacement [G204001 Fencing & Gates - Site] Board Inspection -1.00N/A 2022 $27,080.00 $1,519,527.00G204001 Fencing & Gates - Site


Replacement [G2050 Landscaping - Site] Board Inspection -1.00N/A 2019 $27,080.00 $1,546,607.00G2050 Landscaping - Site


Replacement [G2020 Parking Lots - Site] Board Inspection -1.00N/A 2022 $27,080.00 $1,573,687.00G2020 Parking Lots - Site


Replacement [G2010 Roadways - Site] Board Inspection -1.00N/A 2022 $12,998.00 $1,586,685.00G2010 Roadways - Site


Replacement [G204007 Playing Fields - Site] Board Inspection -1.00N/A 2022 $70,408.00 $1,657,093.00G204007 Playing Fields - Site


Replacement [G204007 Playing Fields] Board Inspection -1.00N/A 2020 $86,656.00 $1,743,749.00G204007 Playing Fields


Replacement Routine Data Entry -1.00N/A 2020 $61,870.00 $1,805,619.00D304005 Glycol Distribution Systems




Element



St Leo CS, Building ID10115-1

Replace metal stair and terrazzo treads atstairwell D.


85.01Urgent 2014 $127,500.00 $127,500.00C201001 Interior Stair Construction


Study [G30 Site Civil/Mechanical Utilities] Validation Survey2011-2015

77.01Urgent 2014 $30,600.00 $158,100.00G30 Site Civil/Mechanical Utilities


Replacement [G30 Site Civil/Mechanical Utilities] Validation Survey2011-2015

77.01Urgent 2014 $306,000.00 $464,100.00G30 Site Civil/Mechanical Utilities


Replace the skylight. Validation Survey2011-2015

75.01Urgent 2014 $76,500.00 $540,600.00B1020 Roof Construction - Skylight


Repair the lower level foundation walls in theoriginal building.


71.01High 2014 $255,000.00 $795,600.00B2010 Exterior Walls - FoundationWalls


Replace all exterior doors and frames. - 19 doors Validation Survey2011-2015

69.01High 2014 $51,000.00 $846,600.00B2030 Exterior Doors - OriginalBuilding, Additions 1,2 and 3


Replace all exterior door hardware. - 19 doors Validation Survey2011-2015

69.01High 2014 $30,600.00 $877,200.00B2030 Exterior Doors - Hardware -Original Building, Additions 1,2 and 3


Replace the natural gas fired domestic hot waterheater


63.01High 2014 $4,590.00 $881,790.00D2020 Domestic Water Distribution


Replace the domestic hot water circulationpumps


63.01High 2014 $9,180.00 $890,970.00D2020 Domestic Water Distribution


Replace the heating water distribution systemsin the c.1926, c.1958 and c.1963 building areasif warranted by the results of the recommendedstudy


62.01High 2014 $408,000.00 $1,298,970.00D304003 Heating/Chilling waterdistribution systems


Perform intrusive testing of the heating waterdistribution systems


62.01High 2014 $12,240.00 $1,311,210.00D304003 Heating/Chilling waterdistribution systems


Replace all original (VAT) and (VCT) floor tilesthroughout the school.


61.01High 2014 $229,500.00 $1,540,710.00C3020 Floor Finishes - OriginalBuilding, Addiiton 1,2 and 3 - VinylFloor Tiles


Replace the original power distribution panelslocated in the c.1926, c.1958 and c.1963building areas


60.01High 2015 $71,400.00 $1,612,110.00D501005 Panels




Element



St. Leo




Replacement [D502001 Branch Wiring] Validation Survey2011-2015

59.01High 2014 $131,389.00 $1,743,499.00D502001 Branch Wiring


Replace all acoustic tile ceilings throughout theschool.


57.01High 2014 $127,500.00 $1,870,999.00C3030 Ceiling Finishes - OriginalBuilding, Addition 1,2 and 3 - AcousticTile Ceiling


Replace the hot water heating system terminalunits in the c.1926, c.1958 and c.1963 buildingareas when the hot water heating systemdistribution piping is replaced


54.01High 2014 $122,400.00 $1,993,399.00D3050 Terminal & Package Units


Replace the chain link fencing, posts, rails andgates at the perimetre of the school property.


54.01High 2014 $86,700.00 $2,080,099.00G204001 Fencing & Gates


Replace all original plumbing fixtures in thebuilding (approximately 110 fixtures)


48.01Medium 2014 $196,350.00 $2,276,449.00D2010 Plumbing Fixtures


Replace the domestic water distribution systemsif warranted by the results of the recommendedstudy








Repair terrazzo flooring in the corridor 202 andstairwell D.


46.01Medium 2016 $40,800.00 $2,611,009.00C302002 Terrazzo Floor Finishes -Original Building and Addition 1


Repair the cracked epoxy flooring in corridor207.


46.01Medium 2016 $35,700.00 $2,646,709.00C3020 Floor Finishes - Epoxy Flooring


Replace all toilet partitions in the girls and boyswashrooms and change rooms.


44.01Medium 2014 $76,500.00 $2,723,209.00C1030 Fittings - Original Building,Addiiton 1,2 and 3 - Toilet Partitions


Replace the rooftop exhaust fans and the interiorceiling mounted exhaust fans


44.01Medium 2015 $32,640.00 $2,755,849.00D304007 Exhaust Systems


Replace the millwork in classrooms and staffrooms throughout the school.


44.01Medium 2014 $255,000.00 $3,010,849.00C1030 Fittings - Millwork - Orig Bld,Addition 1, 2 & 3


Replace the asphalt paved parking lot. Validation Survey2011-2015

42.01Medium 2014 $66,300.00 $3,077,149.00G2020 Parking Lots


Replace the poured in place concrete walkways. Validation Survey2011-2015

42.01Medium 2014 $35,700.00 $3,112,849.00G2030 Pedestrian Paving


Replace interior wood doors -75 doors Validation Survey2011-2015

42.01Medium 2014 $198,900.00 $3,311,749.00C1020 Interior Doors - OriginalBuilding, Addiiton 1,2 and 3


Replace the suspended acoustic panel ceilingsthroughout the school.


42.01Medium 2014 $178,500.00 $3,490,249.00C3030 Ceiling Finishes - OriginalBuilding, Addition 1,2 and 3 -Suspended Acoustic Panel Ceiling




Element



Suspended Acoustic Panel Ceiling


Replace the paint finish ceiling covering on theexposed steel structure in themultipurpose/stage room.


42.01Medium 2016 $40,800.00 $3,531,049.00C3030 Ceiling Finishes - PaintedFinish Exposed Steel Structure/Ducts


Replacement [D4020 Standpipe Systems] Validation Survey2011-2015

40.61Medium 2017 $107,748.00 $3,638,797.00D4020 Standpipe Systems


Replacement [D4010 Sprinklers] Validation Survey2011-2015

40.61Medium 2017 $150,554.00 $3,789,351.00D4010 Sprinklers


Replace the asphalt paved playing fields. Validation Survey2011-2015

40.01Medium 2014 $25,132.00 $3,814,483.00G204007 Playing Fields


Replace the painted classroom wall coveringsthroughout the school.


40.01Medium 2015 $127,500.00 $3,941,983.00C3010 Wall Finishes - OriginalBuilding, Addiiton 1,2 and 3 - PaintedWall Coverings


Replacement [D302002 Hot Water Boilers] Routine Data Entry 34.61Medium 2017 $63,497.00 $4,005,480.00D302002 Hot Water Boilers


Replacement [B3010 Roof Coverings -Coverings: Standart Felt] - Coverings: StandartFelt

Routine Data Entry 30.61Medium 2018 $86,169.00 $4,091,649.00B3010 Roof Coverings - Coverings:Standart Felt


Replacement [B2010 Exterior Walls] Validation Survey2011-2015

26.61Medium 2017 $956,797.00 $5,048,446.00B2010 Exterior Walls


Replacement [G204001 Fencing & Gates] Validation Survey2011-2015

24.61Low 2017 $57,951.00 $5,106,397.00G204001 Fencing & Gates






Replacement [C3020 Floor Finishes] Validation Survey2011-2015

16.61Low 2017 $207,736.00 $5,314,133.00C3020 Floor Finishes






Replacement - Window Coverings Validation Survey2011-2015

14.61Low 2017 $17,175.00 $5,331,308.00C1030 Fittings - Window Coverings


Replacement [C1030 Fittings] 01.5-030 Fittings& Equipment (All)




Program/Upgrade - Install new PA System andswitches

Routine Data Entry 14.61Low 2014 $22,600.00 $5,535,641.00D503004 Public Address Systems


Replacement - Suspended Accustic PanelCeiling


12.61Low 2017 $172,396.00 $5,708,037.00C3030 Ceiling Finishes - SuspendedAccustic Panel Ceiling




Element




Replacement [C1010 Partitions - Interior FixedPartitions]


10.61Low 2017 $100,188.00 $5,808,225.00C1010 Partitions - Interior FixedPartitions





Replacement [C1030 Fittings - Millwork] Routine Data Entry -1.00N/A 2019 $276,551.00 $6,203,298.00C1030 Fittings - Millwork


Replacement [D302005 Auxiliary Eqipment -Heat Exchangers]

Routine Data Entry -1.00N/A 2019 $9,338.00 $6,212,636.00D302005 Auxiliary Eqipment - HeatExchangers




-1.00N/A 2020 $14,000.00 $6,226,636.00D303099 Other Cooling GeneratingSystems - DX Split AHU-Cool


Replacement [D3060 Controls &Instrumentation]

Routine Data Entry -1.00N/A 2019 $114,225.00 $6,340,861.00D3060 Controls & Instrumentation



-1.00N/A 2020 $60,000.00 $6,400,861.00D503001 Fire Alarm Systems


Replacement [D503008 Security Systems] Routine Data Entry -1.00N/A 2019 $9,338.00 $6,410,199.00D503008 Security Systems



-1.00N/A 2019 $50,000.00 $6,460,199.00D503099 Other Communications &Alarm Systems




Element



St Louis CS, Building ID7803-1

Replace the c.1963 original distribution panels(PP01 and PP02) and the original motor starters(approximately five)


75.01Urgent 2014 $15,300.00 $15,300.00D501005 Panels


Replace the chain link fence, posts and rails. Validation Survey2011-2015

69.01High 2014 $76,500.00 $91,800.00G204001 Fencing & Gates


Replace the boiler breeching and stack when theoriginal boiler is replaced


69.01High 2014 $8,160.00 $99,960.00D302005 Auxiliary Eqipment - Stacks& Breaching


Replace the carpet in the Library. Validation Survey2011-2015

61.01High 2014 $25,500.00 $125,460.00C3020 Floor Finishes - Carpeting


Repair the cracked terrazzo flooring. Validation Survey2011-2015

61.01High 2014 $20,400.00 $145,860.00C302002 Terrazzo Floor Finishes -Original Building


Replace roof section 1.0. Validation Survey2011-2015

60.01High 2015 $102,000.00 $247,860.00B3010 Roof Coverings


Replace the 11 roof mounted exhaust fans Validation Survey2011-2015

59.01High 2014 $33,660.00 $281,520.00D304007 Exhaust Systems


Replace the paved asphalt parking lot. Validation Survey2011-2015

57.01High 2014 $86,700.00 $368,220.00G2020 Parking Lots


Replace the suspended acoustical panel ceilingthroughout the school.


57.01High 2014 $127,500.00 $495,720.00C3030 Ceiling Finishes - OriginalBuilding, Addition 1 - SuspendedAcoustical Panel Ceiling


Replacement [B2020 Exterior Windows] Validation Survey2011-2015

56.01High 2016 $127,500.00 $623,220.00B2020 Exterior Windows


Replace the exterior doors and frames on theoriginal portion of the school. - 8 doors.


54.01High 2015 $30,600.00 $653,820.00B2030 Exterior Doors


Replace the exterior door hardware on theexterior doors as part of the original building. - 8doors.


54.01High 2015 $15,300.00 $669,120.00B2030 Exterior Doors - Hardware


Replace the two packaged rooftop make-up airunits (one KDH and one Engineered Air)


50.01High 2014 $55,080.00 $724,200.00D302099 Other Heat GeneratingSystems - Make-Up Air Units




Element



St. Louis




Replace the remaining original plumbing fixturesin the c.1963 original building (approximately 20fixtures)


48.01Medium 2014 $35,700.00 $759,900.00D2010 Plumbing Fixtures


Replace the domestic water distribution systemsin the c.1963 original building if warranted by theresults of the recommended study


48.01Medium 2016 $102,000.00 $861,900.00D2020 Domestic Water Distribution






Replace all the VAT and VCT flooring in theoriginal portion of the school.


46.01Medium 2015 $127,500.00 $996,540.00C3020 Floor Finishes - OriginalBuilding - Vinyl Floor Tiles


Replace the public address/intercom system Validation Survey2011-2015

44.01Medium 2014 $45,900.00 $1,042,440.00D503004 Public Address Systems


Replace the toilet partitions in the boys and girlswashrooms and change rooms.


44.01Medium 2014 $20,400.00 $1,062,840.00C1030 Fittings - Original Bulding -Toilet Partition


Replace the millwork in classrooms and staffrooms.


44.01Medium 2016 $122,400.00 $1,185,240.00C1030 Fittings - Millwork - Orig Bld


Replace the interior wood doors complete withhardware. - 20 doors


42.01Medium 2015 $53,040.00 $1,238,280.00C1020 Interior Doors - OriginalBuilding


Replacement [D4020 Standpipe Systems] Validation Survey2011-2015

40.61Medium 2017 $64,917.00 $1,303,197.00D4020 Standpipe Systems


Replace the asphalt paved playing field. Validation Survey2011-2015

40.01Medium 2015 $163,200.00 $1,466,397.00G204007 Playing Fields


Replace painted wall coverings in classrooms,washrooms, general purpose rooms, changerooms and staff rooms.


40.01Medium 2015 $127,500.00 $1,593,897.00C3010 Wall Finishes - OriginalBuilding, Addition 1, - PaintedWallcovering


Replacement [D304003 Heating/Chilling waterdistribution systems]


32.61Medium 2017 $253,177.00 $1,847,074.00D304003 Heating/Chilling waterdistribution systems


Replacement [D3050 Terminal & Package Units] Validation Survey2011-2015

24.61Low 2017 $52,322.00 $1,899,396.00D3050 Terminal & Package Units



22.61Low 2017 $10,387.00 $1,909,783.00D502002 Lighting Equipment


Replacement [D502002 Lighting Equipment] Routine Data Entry 22.61Low 2017 $12,984.00 $1,922,767.00D502002 Lighting Equipment


Replacement [D304008 Air Handling Units] Validation Survey2011-2015

20.61Low 2017 $30,000.00 $1,952,767.00D304008 Air Handling Units -Gymnasium AHU




Element








Replacement [D2020 Domestic WaterDistribution]


18.61Low 2017 $6,000.00 $1,958,767.00D2020 Domestic Water Distribution


Replacement [D503099 Other Communications& Alarm Systems]











Replacement [C1030 Fittings - Millwork] Validation Survey2011-2015

14.61Low 2017 $166,621.00 $2,313,013.00C1030 Fittings - Millwork





Replacement [C1030 Fittings - WashroomAccessories]


14.61Low 2017 $15,579.00 $2,364,373.00C1030 Fittings - WashroomAccessories


Replacement [D503008 Security Systems] Validation Survey2011-2015

14.00Low 2017 $20,000.00 $2,384,373.00D503008 Security Systems


Replacement [G2030 Pedestrian Paving] Validation Survey2011-2015

12.61Low 2017 $18,090.00 $2,402,463.00G2030 Pedestrian Paving


Replacement [C3030 Ceiling Finishes] Validation Survey2011-2015

12.61Low 2017 $103,868.00 $2,506,331.00C3030 Ceiling Finishes


Major Repair [C3030 Ceiling Finishes] Validation Survey2011-2015

12.61Low 2017 $14,313.00 $2,520,644.00C3030 Ceiling Finishes


Replacement [C1010 Partitions - Interior FixedPartitions]







Replacement [G30 Site Civil/Mechanical Utilities] Routine Data Entry -1.00N/A 2020 $30,511.00 $2,686,971.00G30 Site Civil/Mechanical Utilities



Routine Data Entry -1.00N/A 2019 $32,847.00 $2,719,818.00C1030 Fittings - Window Coverings



Routine Data Entry -1.00N/A 2019 $56,261.00 $2,776,079.00D303099 Other Cooling GeneratingSystems - DX Split AHU-Cool




Element




Replacement [D304001 Air Distribution, Heating& Cooling]

Routine Data Entry -1.00N/A 2020 $284,121.00 $3,060,200.00D304001 Air Distribution, Heating &Cooling


Replacement [D501003 Main Switchboards] Routine Data Entry -1.00N/A 2021 $139,547.00 $3,199,747.00D501003 Main Switchboards


Replacement [D501003 Main Switchboards] Routine Data Entry -1.00N/A 2021 $58,513.00 $3,258,260.00D501003 Main Switchboards


Replacement [D503001 Fire Alarm Systems] Routine Data Entry -1.00N/A 2019 $61,887.00 $3,320,147.00D503001 Fire Alarm Systems




Element



St Mark CS, Building ID7833-1

Replacement [B2030 Exterior Doors] Validation Survey2011-2015

69.01High 2014 $61,200.00 $61,200.00B2030 Exterior Doors


Replace all carpet flooring throughout theschool.


61.01High 2014 $56,100.00 $117,300.00C3020 Floor Finishes - Carpet


Replace the paved asphalt parking lot surface. Validation Survey2011-2015

57.01High 2014 $102,000.00 $219,300.00G2020 Parking Lots


Replace the paved asphalt roadway. Validation Survey2011-2015

57.01High 2014 $76,500.00 $295,800.00G2010 Roadways


Replace the asphalt paved playing field. Validation Survey2011-2015

55.01High 2014 $229,500.00 $525,300.00G204007 Playing Fields



55.01High 2014 $20,400.00 $545,700.00C 3010 Wall Finishes - C301099 OtherWall Finishes - Vinly Wall Coverings


Replace the emergency lighting system batteries Validation Survey2011-2015

52.01High 2014 $4,590.00 $550,290.00D502002 Lighting Equipment


Replace the two natural gas fired domestic hotwater heaters




Replacement [F105002 Building AutomationSystem - Johnson Controls (Metasys)]

Routine Data Entry 48.01Medium 2017 $109,755.00 $670,245.00F105002 Building Automation System- Johnson Controls (Metasys)


Major Repair [C3020 Floor Finishes] Repair Validation Survey2011-2015

46.01Medium 2016 $30,600.00 $700,845.00C3020 Floor Finishes - Vinyl FloorTiles



46.01Medium 2016 $51,000.00 $751,845.00C3020 Floor Finishes - Terrazzo


Replace the four roof mounted exhaust fans. Validation Survey2011-2015

44.01Medium 2016 $14,280.00 $766,125.00D304007 Exhaust Systems


Replace the security system Validation Survey2011-2015

44.01Medium 2015 $20,400.00 $786,525.00D503008 Security Systems- All(Panel, Contacts & Motion Detectors)


Replace the public address/intercom system Validation Survey2011-2015

44.01Medium 2014 $45,900.00 $832,425.00D503004 Public Address Systems




Element



St. Mark




Replace the millwork in the classrooms. Validation Survey2011-2015

44.01Medium 2014 $30,600.00 $863,025.00C1030 Fittings - Millwork


Replacement [C3030 Ceiling Finishes] Validation Survey2011-2015

42.01Medium 2016 $102,000.00 $965,025.00C3030 Ceiling Finishes - SuspendedAcoustic Panel Ceiling


Replacement [D503001 Fire Alarm Systems -All] - All


40.61Medium 2018 $60,000.00 $1,025,025.00D503001 Fire Alarm Systems - All


Replacement [D4030 Fire Protection Specialties] Validation Survey2011-2015

40.61Medium 2017 $2,580.00 $1,027,605.00D4030 Fire Protection Specialties


Replace the painted wall coverings throughoutthe school.


40.01Medium 2016 $127,500.00 $1,155,105.00C3010 Wall Finishes - Painted WallCoverings


Major Repair [B2010 Exterior Walls - (Brick FaceCavity Wall)] Repair


26.61Medium 2017 $14,313.00 $1,169,418.00B2010 Exterior Walls - (Brick FaceCavity Wall)


Major Repair [B2020 Exterior Windows -(Aluminum Window)]


26.61Medium 2017 $35,746.00 $1,205,164.00B2020 Exterior Windows - (AluminumWindow)


Replacement [D302005 Auxiliary Equipment -Heat Exchangers]


24.61Low 2017 $9,323.00 $1,214,487.00D302005 Auxiliary Equipment - HeatExchangers


Replacement [D302005 Auxiliary Equipment -HVAC Pumps]


24.61Low 2017 $35,908.00 $1,250,395.00D302005 Auxiliary Equipment - HVACPumps




20.61Low 2017 $72,175.00 $1,322,570.00D303099 Other Cooling GeneratingSystems - DX Split AHU-Cool






Replacement [D503099 Other Communications& Alarm Systems]











Replacement [D503004 Public Address Systems- All (PA, Cable TV, Telephone)] - All (PA, CableTV, Telephone)


14.61Low 2018 $64,905.00 $1,484,277.00D503004 Public Address Systems -(Cable TV, Telephone)





Major Repair [C1030 Fittings - Millwork (FixedFurnishing)]


14.61Low 2017 $12,309.00 $1,626,949.00C1030 Fittings - Millwork (FixedFurnishing)




Element




Replacement [C1030 Fittings - WashroomsAccessories- Entire Building]


14.61Low 2017 $46,231.00 $1,673,180.00C1030 Fittings - WashroomsAccessories - Entire Building




14.61Low 2017 $122,282.00 $1,795,462.00C1030 Fittings - Window Coverings


Replacement [G2030 Pedestrian Paving] Routine Data Entry 12.61Low 2018 $23,206.00 $1,818,668.00G2030 Pedestrian Paving


Replacement [C1020 Interior Door Hardware] Validation Survey2011-2015

12.61Low 2017 $7,745.00 $1,826,413.00C1020 Interior Door Hardware


Replacement [C1020 Interior Doors - (Door &Frame)]

Routine Data Entry 12.61Low 2018 $152,557.00 $1,978,970.00C1020 Interior Doors - (Door & Frame)


Major Repair [C1010 Partitions - Interior FixedPartitions]




Replacement [D304001 Air Distribution, Heating& Cooling]


-1.00N/A 2023 $100,188.00 $2,130,870.00D304001 Air Distribution, Heating &Cooling





Replacement [D502002 Lighting Equipment -Fluorescent & Metal Halide Fixture]


-1.00N/A 2023 $350,000.00 $2,490,889.00D502002 Lighting Equipment -Fluorescent & Metal Halide Fixture


Replacement [D3050 Terminal & Package Units] Routine Data Entry -1.00N/A 2022 $121,914.00 $2,612,803.00D3050 Terminal & Package Units


Replacement [D302099 Other Heat GeneratingSystems - Roof Top AHU-Heat/Cool]

Routine Data Entry -1.00N/A 2019 $35,365.00 $2,648,168.00D302099 Other Heat GeneratingSystems - Roof Top AHU-Heat/Cool


Replacement [D1010 Elevators & Lifts] Validation Survey2003

-1.00N/A 2023 $155,656.00 $2,803,824.00D1010 Elevators & Lifts





Replacement Routine Data Entry -1.00N/A 2020 $61,870.00 $2,877,694.00D304005 Glycol Distribution Systems




Element



TCDSB Capital Program Summary 1992 to 2015

Capital Program (June 2014) Trustee Ward Trustee Name Project Type Project StageProjected

Completion

Capacity

Increase

Area

Increase

(SM)

Estimated Total

Project Cost

Phase 1 ‐ Building AdditionsPupil

Places

Building

Area

Total

Cost

St Stephen Trustee Ward 01 Joseph Martino Elementary Addition Occupied 2011 190 1,167 $3,346,822

Cardinal Leger Trustee Ward 08 Garry Tanuan Elementary Addition Occupied 2011 98 634 $2,056,374

Josyf Cardinal Slipyj Trustee Ward 02 Ann Andrachuk Elementary Addition Occupied 2012 130 785 $2,654,493

St Thomas More Trustee Ward 12 Nancy Crawford Elementary Addition Occupied 2011 239 1,558 $4,139,320

Nativity of Our Lord Trustee Ward 02 Ann Andrachuk Elementary Addition Occupied 2012 107 693 $2,874,734

St Charles Garnier Trustee Ward 04 Patrizia Bottoni Elementary Addition Occupied 2012 190 1,101 $3,387,083

St Norbert Trustee Ward 04 Patrizia Bottoni Elementary Addition Occupied 2011 95 598 $2,301,759

St Henry Trustee Ward 07 Michael Del Grande Elementary Addition Occupied 2012 164 723 $2,459,030

St Pius X Trustee Ward 10 Barbara Poplawski Elementary Addition Occupied 2012 150 1,192 $4,038,447

St Agatha Trustee Ward 12 Nancy Crawford Elementary Addition Occupied 2012 233 1,610 $5,350,948

St Bernard Trustee Ward 03 Sal Piccininni Elementary Addition Occupied 2012 285 1,675 $5,146,245

St Albert Trustee Ward 07 Michael Del Grande Elementary Addition Occupied 2012 423 1,641 $5,457,147

St Joachim Trustee Ward 12 Nancy Crawford Elementary Addition Occupied 2012 216 1,151 $4,572,691

Father Serra Trustee Ward 01 Joseph Martino Elementary Addition Occupied 2012 167 1,015 $4,242,075

Sts Cosmas & Damian Trustee Ward 05 Maria Rizzo Elementary Addition Occupied 2012 141 933 $4,092,432

St Bonaventure Trustee Ward 05 Maria Rizzo Elementary Addition Occupied 2013 242 1,361 $5,630,893

Phase 1 ‐ Subtotal 3,070 17,837 $61,750,493

Phase 2 ‐ New/Replacement SchoolsPupil

Places

Building

Area

Total

Cost

Blessed Pier Giorgio Frassati (Morningside) Trustee Ward 08 Garry Tanuan New Elementary Occupied 2013 467 4,500 $10,019,115

St Ambrose Trustee Ward 02 Ann Andrachuk Elementary Replacement Occupied 2013 398 3,729 $10,265,523

St Andre (Yvonne) Trustee Ward 03 Sal Piccininni Elementary Replacement Occupied 2015 522 4,421 $11,089,969

St Conrad Trustee Ward 04 Patrizia Bottoni Elementary Replacement Occupied 2012 582 5,578 $12,277,228

St Edward (Botham) Trustee Ward 05 Maria Rizzo New Elementary Occupied 2014 421 4,056 $11,391,298

St Nicholas Trustee Ward 12 Nancy Crawford Elementary Replacement Occupied 2013 444 4,047 $9,407,643

Phase 2 ‐ Subtotal 2,834 26,331 $64,450,776

Phase 3 ‐ Funded Capital ProjectsPupil

Places

Building

Area

Total

Cost

Dante Alighieri Academy Trustee Ward 05 Maria Rizzo Secondary Replacement In Design/Land Acquisition 2019 1,300 15,964 $34,812,376

The Holy Trinity Trustee Ward 02 Ann Andrachuk Elementary Replacement In Design & Approvals 2017 536 5,199 $13,796,159

Msgr. Fraser Midland Trustee Ward 07 Michael Del Grande Secondary Addition Occupied 2014 319 TBD $2,208,967

St John Evangelist Trustee Ward 06 Frank D'Amico Elementary Replacement In Design/Land Acquisition 2018 600 6,084 $15,231,434

St Joseph's Morrow Park Trustee Ward 07 Michael Del Grande Secondary Replacement In Design/Land Acquisition 2018 800 10,913 $29,523,298

St Simon Trustee Ward 03 Sal Piccininni Elementary Replacement In Design & Approvals 2017 202 1,212 $13,204,414

Phase 3 ‐ Subtotal 3,757 39,372 $108,776,648

Phase 4A ‐ Capital Project: Funded

St Margaret Trustee Ward 05 Maria Rizzo Replacement School Pre‐Planning 400 TBD $16,003,237

Annunciation Our Lord Trustee Ward 11 Angela Kennedy Year 5 Retrofit (included below) Addition cancelled NA NA NA $0

St Antoine Daniel Trustee Ward 05 Maria Rizzo Addition protected funding NA NA NA $2,963,214

St Malachy Trustee Ward 08 Garry Tanuan FDK + Classroom Addition Construct 2015 178 TBD $3,892,010

Phase 4A ‐ Subtotal 578 0 $22,858,461

Phase 4B ‐ Capital Project: Partially Funded

Our Lady of the Assumption Trustee Ward 05 Maria Rizzo FDK Addition Complete 2015 55 TBD $2,674,437

St Elizabeth Trustee Ward 02 Ann Andrachuk FDK Addition Complete 2015 55 TBD $2,009,152

St Paschal Baylon Trustee Ward 05 Maria Rizzo FDK+Classroom+Gym Addition FDK complete; Construct 2015 408 TBD $16,033,286

St Ursula Trustee Ward 12 Nancy Crawford FDK+Classroom Addition In design 2015 97 TBD $2,496,554

Phase 4B ‐ Subtotal 615 0 $23,213,429

Phase 5A ‐ Capital Project: FDK funded

Year 4 ELKP Retrofits Various Various No Additions Occupied 2013 TBD TBD $9,171,265

Phase 5A ‐ Subtotal TBD TBD $9,171,265

2010 ‐ 2017 Capital Program

1 4/20/2015

TCDSB Capital Program Summary 1992 to 2015

Capital Program (June 2014) Trustee Ward Trustee Name Project Type Project StageProjected

Completion

Capacity

Increase

Area

Increase

(SM)

Estimated Total

Project Cost

All Saints Trustee Ward 01 Joseph Martino FDK Addition Complete 2014 44 TBD $681,056

Holy Spirit Trustee Ward 07 Michael Del Grande FDK Addition Complete 2014 84 TBD $1,872,346

Our Lady of Peace Trustee Ward 02 Ann Andrachuk FDK Addition Construct 2015 84 TBD $3,186,394

Our Lady of Sorrows Trustee Ward 02 Ann Andrachuk FDK Addition Complete 2015 90 TBD $1,094,507

Our Lady of Wisdom Trustee Ward 07 Michael Del Grande FDK+Classroom Addition Construct 2015 120 TBD $3,117,051

St Agnes Trustee Ward 07 Michael Del Grande FDK Addition Construct 2015 32 TBD $1,365,642

St Augustine of Canterbury Trustee Ward 04 Patrizia Bottoni FDK+Classroom+Gym Addition Construct 2015 218 TBD $7,857,403

St Clement Trustee Ward 02 Ann Andrachuk FDK+Classroom+Gym Addition Pre‐Planning 2016 135 TBD $6,051,962

St Denis Trustee Ward 11 Angela Kennedy FDK Addition Complete 2015 69 TBD $1,508,167

St Eugene Trustee Ward 01 Joseph Martino FDK+Classroom+Gym Addition Pre‐Planning 2017 311 TBD $9,432,474

St Fidelis Trustee Ward 03 Sal Piccininni Replacement School Pre‐Planning 2019 289 TBD $15,562,800

St Kevin Trustee Ward 07 Michael Del Grande FDK Addition Complete 2014 58 TBD $1,454,518

St Rose of Lima Trustee Ward 12 Nancy Crawford FDK Addition Construct 2014 78 TBD $2,164,252

St Victor Trustee Ward 12 Nancy Crawford FDK+Classroom Addition Pre‐Planning 2015 234 TBD $6,254,430

Transfiguration of Our Lord Trustee Ward 01 Joseph Martino FDK Addition Complete 2014 55 TBD $1,445,949

Year 5 ELKP Various Various No Additions Construct 2014 TBD TBD $9,354,211

Phase 5B ‐ Subtotal 1,901 0 $72,403,162

Phase 6 ‐ Development Funded Projects

Railway Lands (Block 31) Trustee Ward 09 Jo‐Ann Davis New Elementary Design 2019 510 4,947 $15,000,000

Holy Rosary Trustee Ward 09 Jo‐Ann Davis Redevelop New Bldg. Pre‐Planning 490 4,753 $11,217,080

St Michael Choir Trustee Ward 09 Jo‐Ann Davis Redevelop New Bldg. Pre‐Planning 318 3,838 $14,160,000

Blessed Cardinal Newman Trustee Ward 12 Nancy Crawford Secondary Replacement Pre‐Planning 1,300 15,964 $32,818,951

Phase 6 ‐ Subtotal 2,618 29,502 $73,196,031

2010‐2017 Capital Program Total: 15,373 113,042 $435,820,265

2 4/20/2015

Phase 5B ‐ Capital Project: Partial FDK funded

A GUIDE TO THE GRANTS FOR

STUDENTS NEEDS

2015-16 Education Funding

TABLE OF CONTENTSIntroduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

How funding is structured . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

Accountability for education funding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

Funding for classrooms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

Pupil Foundation Grant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

Qualifications and Experience Grant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

Continuing education and other programs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

Funding for schools . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

School Foundation Grant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

School Operations and Renewal Grant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

Funding a locally managed system . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

School Board Administration and Governance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

Student Transportation Grant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

Declining Enrolment Adjustment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

Geographic Circumstances Grant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

Funding for specific priorities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

Learning Opportunities Grant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

Special Education Grant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

Language Grant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

First Nations, Métis and Inuit Education Supplement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17

Safe and Accepting Schools Supplement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18

Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19

Appendix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20

2015-16 Education Funding: A Guide to the Grants for Student Needs

2015-16 Education Funding: A Guide to the Grants for Student Needs 1

INTRODUCTIONOntario is widely recognized as having one of the world’s best elementary and secondary school systems, and is continuously working to improve it. This guide is intended to support the important conversations among partners in the education sector by providing a clear explanation of how education is funded in Ontario through the Grants for Student Needs, or GSN. It also sets out the accountabilities of school boards and the Ministry of Education for the use of education dollars and discusses efforts to continuously improve the formulas used to fund education in Ontario.

The GSN supports funding for the classroom, school leadership and operations, specific student-related priorities and local management by school boards. The GSN’s purpose is to help the system achieve key goals, especially those of Achieving Excellence, Ontario’s renewed vision for education.

Achieving Excellence consolidates the many gains made by the education system to date and sets out a commitment to take it to the next level. It was developed by the ministry through extensive consultations with its partners in the education system.

The renewed vision emphasizes the focus on classroom education, which is the foundation of the system. At the same time, it broadens the system’s aims to look at more than academic achievement, especially by supporting student well-being in a range of areas. It also recognizes the system’s need to close the gaps, so that all students benefit from a strong educational system attuned to individual needs.

The Ministry of Education, school boards and other stakeholders in publicly funded education are working together to align funding for school boards with the aims of Achieving Excellence.

What GSN funding supports

• Classrooms ($12.4B)• Schools ($3.8B)• Specific priorities ($4.0B)• Local management ($2.2B)

The goals GSN funding helps achieve

• Achieving Excellence• Ensuring Equity• Promoting Well-being• Enhancing Public Confidence

http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/about/excellent.html



2015-16 Education Funding: A Guide to the Grants for Student Needs2

How funding is structuredThe Ministry of Education provides the bulk of operating funding to Ontario’s 72 district school boards1 through the annual GSN, also known as “the funding formula.” The GSN is actually a collection of grants described in detail in a regulation under the Education Act each year.

Many grants are made up of two or more components, which are called “allocations.” This guide sets out the funding provided by each grant and gives an explanation, including a high-level description of the calculation, of the major allocations within it.

Because the ministry and its partners focus on aligning resources with the key goals of the education system, this guide has been structured to reflect those goals by grouping grants under the following headings:

• Funding for classrooms focuses on providing classroom resources.

• Funding for schools provides the resources to ensure schools have the leadership they need and are clean and well-maintained facilities for learning. Funding is also positioned to encourage the most efficient use of space possible.

• Funding a locally managed system aims to ensure board leadership carries out focused activities to support alignment of resources which help schools and students strive to achieve excellence.

• Funding for specific priorities speaks mainly to the Achieving Excellence goal of closing gaps by, for example, meeting special education needs and improving language proficiency.

The ministry recognizes that conditions vary widely across Ontario and the funding formulas cannot take every situation into account. This is why local school boards have flexibility in how they use funding, within the over-all accountability framework discussed in the next section.

1 There are also 10 School Authorities, consisting of four geographically isolated boards and six hospital-based school authorities.

http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/english/elaws_statutes_90e02_e.htm


For the school board sector as a whole, GSN funding represents the overwhelming majority of revenues, more than 90%. Over the past decade, funding from this source has increased, even though demographic factors have caused enrolment to decline:

GSN FUNDING AND ENROLMENT SINCE 2002-03

$0.0B

$5.0B

$10.0B

$15.0B

$20.0B

$25.0B

Gra

nts

for

Stu

dent

Nee

ds

2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15RE

2015-16Proj

$14.4B$15.2B

$15.9B$16.6B $17.1B

$18.1B$18.9B

$19.5B$20.4B

$21.3B $21.6B $21.7B$22.4B $22.5B

1,850,000

1,900,000

1,950,000

2,000,000

2,050,000

2,100,000

2,150,000

2,200,000

Ave

rage

Dai

ly E

nro

lmen

t

Note: To provide a clear year-over-year comparison, FDK funding, which was previously outside the GSN, has been added. The increase in enrolment is as a result of FDK.


School boards also receive funding from the ministry for special, often time-limited programs, and from other ministries for specific purposes related to their mandates.

School boards may also raise funds on their own. Examples include renting out excess school space or charging fees for enhanced programming. These funds, however, should not be used to replace public funding for education or to sup-port items funded through provincial grants. A Guideline for School Fundraising and a Guideline for Fees for Learning Materials and Activities may be found on the Ministry of Education website (www.edu.gov.on.ca).

Accountability for education funding A central aim of Achieving Excellence – and one that extends beyond the classroom or even the school – is enhancing public confidence in our education system.

The province invests more than $22 billion a year in education. A major part of enhancing confidence is ensuring accountability for the use of these resources.

The province, through the Ministry of Education, is accountable for the public education system as a whole and the policy decisions that determine funding for school boards. Given their key role in providing services at the local level, school boards have important accountabilities to students, parents and others with a stake in outcomes, as well as to the ministry.

A cornerstone of Ontario’s education system is the principle that school boards have a responsibility to ensure the effective stewardship of resources. Thoughtful, transparent budgeting, aligned with a focused strategy, is vital and integral to this goal.

With respect to the GSN, a robust financial accountability framework has been developed between school boards and the Province. This framework recognizes that accountability to the ministry must be balanced against the need for school board flexibility to address local conditions. It includes:

• Legislative requirements, such as the provision that school boards balance their budgets;

• Requirements around budgeting and financial reporting, as well as monitoring, audit, review and, in some cases, supervisory activities by the Province;

http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/parents/Fund2012Guideline.pdf

http://faab.edu.gov.on.ca/Memos/B2011/B_2%20Attach%201.pdf

http://www.edu.gov.on.ca


• Enveloping, which means requiring that certain grants be used only for the purpose intended; and

• Program/grant specific reporting requirements overseen by various branches of the ministry.

Another important activity that supports accountability is collaboration. Ontario has a proud tradition of open and frank conversations about education funding. Through these conversations, the funding formula benefits from a stronger understanding of the perspectives of others in the system.

The ministry consults annually with many partners, including:

• School board representatives,

• Trustee associations,

• Principals and vice-principals,

• Teachers’ federations and education worker unions,

• Parent groups and

• Student groups.

Consultation and collaboration are invaluable in holding all parties, including the government, accountable for the formulas used to fund education.

This guide describes how several grants are in transition, with changes being phased in over more than one year. These changes have been informed by ongoing consultations with the sector, either through annual consultation sessions or through collaborative working groups that have made technical recommendations on how to improve the GSN.


FUNDING FOR CLASSROOMS

Pupil Foundation Grant This grant, which accounts for about half of the GSN, supports the elements of a classroom education that are generally common to all students. The largest single element of the GSN, it provides funding for the salaries of classroom teachers, early childhood educators for full-day kindergarten, educational assistants, and other teaching staff such as teacher librarians and guidance counsellors. It also funds textbooks, classroom supplies and classroom computers.

The grant is calculated on a per-pupil basis. There are three different per-pupil amounts at the elementary level, depending on the grade in which a student is enrolled – kindergarten, primary (grades 1 to 3), junior/intermediate (grades 4 to 8) – and one per-pupil amount for secondary students. For classroom teachers, the per-pupil amounts reflect benchmark salaries and benefits, regulated class sizes and the need for preparation time. (A separate allocation, discussed below, recognizes teachers’ relative qualifications and experience.) For other staff, the per-pupil amount is based on salaries and benefits and staffing levels.

For 2015–16, funding through the Pupil Foundation Grant is projected to be $10.45 billion.

Qualifications and Experience Grant This grant provides additional support for classroom staff who have qualifications and experience above those provided for through the Pupil Foundation Grant. It is projected to total $1.75 billion in 2015-16:

Allocation 2015-16 Amount

Teacher qualifications and experience $1,588 .4 million

Early childhood educator qualifications and experience $104 .2 million

Other allocations $60 .3 million

Total $1,752.9 million

• The teacher qualifications and experience allocation provides funding to boards with teachers who, because of their qualifications and experience, have average salaries above the benchmark level used in the Pupil Foundation Grant.


• The early childhood educators qualifications and experience allocation is provided for boards with early childhood educators who, because of their qualifications and experience have average salaries above the benchmark.

• The other allocations under this grant include historical adjustments to the funding of non-teaching salary costs and funding for programs to mentor and train new teachers. Additional details can be found in the technical paper available on the ministry website.

Continuing education and other programsThis grant supports a range of programs aimed at adult learners and day-school students, including secondary students who have completed more than 34 credits and wish to continue their studies. The grant is projected to total $153.2 million in 2015-16:


Adult day school $25 .2 million

High-credit day school $8 .8 million

Summer school $32 .3 million

Continuing education $59 .2 million


Total $153.2 million

• The adult day school allocation supports day school programming for students who are at least 21 years of age as of December 31 of the current school year.

• The high-credit day school allocation is for day school programming for secondary students who have completed more than 34 credits and wish to continue their studies.

• The summer school allocation supports programming offered during the summer for day school pupils.

• The continuing education allocation supports a variety of programs delivered inside and outside the classroom (for example, through correspondence, self-study or e-learning), including credit courses for the purpose of earning a secondary school graduation diploma.

• The other allocations of this grant support the teaching of international languages at the elementary level and assessments of mature students’ prior learning. More details are provided in the technical paper, available on the ministry website.

http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/policyfunding/funding.html



FUNDING FOR SCHOOLS

School Foundation GrantThis grant provides funding for principals, vice-principals and office support staff, as well as administrative supplies. The total School Foundation Grant is projected to be $1.42 billion in 2015–16. It is divided into an elementary school and a secondary school portion. It also makes provision for combined schools – that is, schools attended by both elementary and secondary pupils of the same board.

The current year marks the start of a three-year transition in the way the grant is allocated. The new method includes changes that:

• Recognize a school’s remoteness as well as its size;

• Enhance support for combined schools by lowering the enrolment level at which additional principals are funded; and

• Provide greater funding overall for vice-principals in secondary and combined schools.

During the transition, both the old and new allocation methods are being used. In 2015-16, funding will be determined by adding one-third of the result from the new method and two-thirds of the result from the old method.

School Operations and Renewal GrantThis grant supports the costs of operating, maintaining and repairing school facilities. Under the formula, funding is adjusted for boards that have older schools with unique design features such as wide hallways, large shop spaces, and auditorium spaces.


The current year marks the start of a three-year transition to a new allocation method for many components of this grant. The new method includes changes that:

• Eliminates funding for under-utilized space in schools that are not isolated; and

• Re-invests a portion of those savings in the per-pupil funding for all schools.

Funding is also being updated to reflect the current inventory of schools and the implementation of full-day kindergarten.

The grant, consisting of two major allocations, is projected to total $2.38 billion in 2015-16.


School operations $2,051 .4 million

School renewal $325 .0 million


• The school operations allocation, which addresses operating costs such as heating, lighting, maintenance and cleaning of schools, consists of several components. The largest component is based on a benchmark operating cost associated with a standard floor area for each elementary and secondary pupil. This per-pupil benchmark is being increased to support the cost of operating space that students use.

A component of this funding that reflected the costs to clean, light and heat school space that was underutilized is being phased out over the next three years. However, underutilized space in isolated schools will still generate funding.

• The school renewal allocation addresses the costs of repairing and renovating schools. Like the operations allocation, it consists of a number of components. The largest component is based on a benchmark renewal cost associated with a standard floor area for each elementary and secondary pupil. This per-pupil benchmark is being increased to support the cost of renovating the space that students use.

Funding is also adjusted to reflect the renewal needs of older schools and regional variations in construction costs.

Components to address the needs of underutilized space are changing in parallel with the changes to the operating allocation discussed above.


FUNDING A LOCALLY MANAGED SYSTEM

School Board Administration and Governance

This grant provides funding for board administration and governance costs, including those related to board-based staff and board offices and facilities. In 2015-16, it is projected to total $576.0 million.

The way the grant is allocated is in transition. In 2014-15, the ministry introduced a new method that will be fully in place by 2017-18. It replaces three allocations of the previous method with a single allocation, the board administration allocation. During the transition, both methods are being used. This year, the weighting of each is roughly 50%.

The other allocations of this grant are unaffected by the transition.


Board administration (combined old and new models) $537 .6 million



• The new board administration model, developed in consultation with school boards, provides funding for board-level leadership, staff and related supplies and services. The model recognizes ten core functions that all boards, regardless of size, must perform. At the same time, it recognizes that enrolment is an important driver of higher administrative expenses. The new model is replacing a way of allocating funding that relied more heavily on the size of boards’ enrolment.

• The other allocations of this grant include funding for trustee compensa-tion, parent engagement, consolidation accounting and internal audit. Additional details can be found in the technical paper available on the ministry’s website.



Student Transportation Grant This grant provides school boards with funding to transport students to and from school. It is projected to be $887.7 million in 2015–16. The grant is based on the previous year’s amount, with a number of possible adjustments and/or additional allocations:

• The enrolment adjustment is made only for school boards with increasing enrolment, and is based on the percentage increase in enrolment.

• The cost update adjustment factor, which recognizes the increasing costs of providing transportation services, is 2% for 2015-16. The calculation applies the adjustment factor to each board’s 2014-15 transportation grant.

• The fuel escalator and de-escalator provides for funding increases or decreases by comparing the actual price of diesel fuel for southern school boards and northern school boards to a benchmark price.

• Details on the other allocations within this grant, which cover transportation to provincial or demonstration schools, impacts of effectiveness and efficiency reviews of transportation consortia, and full-day kindergarten transportation, can be found in the technical paper available on the ministry’s website.

Declining Enrolment AdjustmentMuch of a school board’s revenue is determined by enrolment. When enrolment goes down, funding also declines. School boards can adjust their costs downward as well, but this may take more than one year. The declining enrolment adjust-ment recognizes this need for extra time. The grant, which is projected to be $33.1 million in 2015-16, is made up of a first-year and second-year component:

Component 2015-16 Amount

First-year $22 .9 million

Second-year $10 .2 million

Total $33.1 million

• The first-year component is based on a weighting of the difference between 2015-16 eligible revenue if enrolment had not changed from the previous year and 2015-16 revenue calculated using the current year’s enrolment. It is available only if the current year’s enrolment is less than the previous year’s.

• The second-year component is 25% of a school board’s 2014–15 first-year component.



Geographic Circumstances Grant This funding recognizes the higher costs related to the remoteness of rural boards and schools. It takes into account several factors, including the enrolment of boards and individual schools, board distance from urban centres and dispersion of schools over a board’s geographic area.

The grant, which is projected to be $193.0 million in 2015-16, is made up of three allocations. The current year marks the start of a three-year transition to a new allocation method for many components of this grant. The new method:

• Updates various geographic parameters that generate funding for boards; and

• Eliminates support for teaching staff in isolated schools that are large enough to generate the required funding under the Pupil Foundation Grant.


Remote and rural $123 .3 million

Supported schools $67 .0 million

Rural and small communities $2 .8 million


• The remote and rural allocation provides funding to: boards with enrolment of less than 16,000; boards that are distant from large urban centres; and boards whose schools are far from board offices and one another. The data underlying these calculations are being updated in 2015-16 to reflect urban population growth and other changes, with the impact phased in over three years.

• The supported schools allocation helps make small, remote schools more viable by providing additional funding for teachers and, in some cases, early childhood educators. A school’s eligibility is based on distance to the board’s closest school of the same type (that is, elementary to elementary and secondary to secondary) with funding varying based on school enrolment.

• The rural and small communities allocation is being phased out.


FUNDING FOR SPECIFIC PRIORITIES

Learning Opportunities GrantThe Learning Opportunities Grant (LOG) provides funding to help students who are at greater risk of lower academic achievement. It is projected to total $504.6 million in 2015-16.


Demographic $349 .9 million

Student achievement envelope $145 .5 million



• The demographic allocation, which represents the largest share of LOG funding, is based on social and economic indicators that signal a higher risk of academic difficulty for students. The indicators are low household income, low parental education, a one-parent household, and recent arrival in Canada. This allocation is distributed to boards based on the ranking of each of their schools on these measures, and a weighting of the measures themselves. Boards can use this funding for initiatives such as breakfast programs, homework clubs, reading recovery and independent supports.

• The student achievement envelope comprises six discrete allocations. These allocations, which directly support programs introduced over the past decade to improve student achievement, are for:

– Literacy and math outside the school day, which funds remedial courses or classes for students who are at risk of not meeting the curriculum standards for literacy or math and/or the requirements of the Grade 10 literacy test.

– Student Success, Grade 7 to 12, which funds a range of resources and activities to improve student engagement in secondary schools.

– Grade 7 and 8 Student Success and literacy and numeracy teachers, which recognizes the need to help students in earlier grades so they are better prepared for the transition to secondary school and beyond.

– The School Effectiveness Framework, which helps schools and boards assess how well elementary schools are performing and develop plans for improvement.


– Ontario Focused Intervention Partnership tutoring, which helps boards set up and/or expand tutoring programs for students who are not achieving the provincial standard in reading, writing, or math.

– The Specialist High Skills Major program, which allows students to customize their secondary school experience and build on their strengths and interests by focusing on a specific economic sector.

There is flexibility in how boards may use the individual allocations, as long as the total funding is spent on the programs within the envelope. Any unspent funding must be used on the programs within the envelope in a future school year.

• The other allocations of this grant provide funding for mental health leaders, who spearhead efforts in boards to promote clear, integrated and responsive pathways to service for students in need, and an adjustment to reflect the impacts of amalgamating school authorities. Additional details can be found in the Technical paper available on the ministry’s website.

Special Education GrantThis grant provides boards with funding for programs, services, and/or equipment for students with special education needs. Boards may use the grant only for special education, and must save any unspent funding to use for special education in a future school year. There is flexibility in how they may use some of the individual allocations within the grant, as long as the funds are spent on special education. The grant, which is projected to total about $2.72 billion in 2015–16, is made up of six allocations:


Special Education per Pupil Amount (SEPPA) $1,401 .8 million

High Needs Amount (HNA) $1050 .0 million

Special Equipment Amount $93 .7 million



• The Special Education per Pupil Amount provides every board with foundational funding toward the cost of special education supports. It is calculated using a board’s total enrolment and a per-pupil amount. There are different per-pupil amounts for kindergarten to Grade 3 pupils, Grade 4 to 8 pupils, and Grade 9 to 12 pupils. The per-pupil amounts in the earlier grades are higher to direct more funding towards early intervention.



• Based on consultations with stakeholders, the ministry last year introduced a new model for allocating the High Needs Amount (HNA). Recognizing the variation across boards in the share of students with special education needs, the nature of the needs, and boards’ ability to meet them, the new model aims to better align the allocation with boards’ needs and resources. This new model will be phased in over four years to replace the previous formula and in 2015-16 this will represent about 50% of the High Needs Amount allocation. The new model, which will be fully phased in by 2017-18, is based on three components: a statistical model that utilizes demographic data at the postal code level to predict special education need; a calculation that considers several indicators for a board, including special education data on programs and services, students’ participation in EQAO testing and academic achievement, and distance from urban centres; and a fixed amount for each board aimed at developing collaborative and integrated approaches.

• Under the Special Equipment Amount, each board receives a base amount plus a per-pupil amount, which together may be used to buy computers, software and other equipment for students with special education needs in line with funding guidelines. In addition, boards may submit claims to recover the costs, less a deductible, of other equipment recommended by a qualified professional for a student with specific special education needs.

• The other allocations of the grant are the Special Incidence Portion for students who require more than two full-time staff to address their health and safety needs and those of others at their school, the Facilities Amount for providing instruction in a care, treatment, custody or correctional facility, and an amount to support board-level expertise in applied behavioural analysis. Additional details can be found in the Technical paper available on the ministry’s website.



Language GrantThis grant provides funding to meet school boards’ costs for language instruction. It is made up of five allocations, and is projected to total $664.6 million in the 2015-16 school year:


English as a Second Language/English Literacy Development (ESL/ELD)

$222 .8 million

French as a Second Language (FSL) $249 .9 million

French as a First Language (FFL) $76 .5 million

Programme d’appui aux nouveaux arrivants (PANA) $6 .0 million

Actualisation linguistique en français (ALF) $109 .3 million


• English as a Second Language/English Literacy Development funding is provided to English-language school boards to support students who need extra help developing proficiency in English. It consists of a Recent Immigrant component and a Pupils in Canada component. The former supports students who are eligible based on their country of birth and who have been in Canada four years or less. The latter reflects an estimate of the number of children in a board whose language spoken most often at home is neither English nor French.

• French as a Second Language funding, available only to English-language boards, supports the costs of French instruction. It provides a per-pupil amount for each student. At the elementary level the amount varies depending on whether the pupil is taking core French, extended French, or is in a French immersion program. At the secondary level, the amount reflects both the student’s grade level and whether the course covers French as a subject or another subject taught in French.

• French as a First Language funding is available only to French-language boards, and recognizes the higher costs of instructional materials and support to provide French-language programs. It is made up of per-pupil amounts for boards’ elementary and secondary enrolments, and a fixed amount for each new elementary school in a French-language board in the current school year.

• The programme d’appui aux nouveaux arrivants supports students from eligible countries who are newly arrived in Canada and do not have a Charter right to education in French, but have been admitted to French-language school boards and require extra help developing proficiency in French.


• Actualisation linguistique en français supports students in French- language boards who have a right to education in French because it is the language of one or both of their parents, but need extra help developing proficiency in French. It is calculated using a per-pupil amount that varies with a board’s “assimilation factor.” The assimilation factor reflects the share of the population with at least one parent having French as their first official language spoken.

First Nations, Métis and Inuit Education Supplement

This funding supports programs designed for Aboriginal students, as outlined in the Ontario First Nation, Métis, and Inuit Education Policy Framework. It is made up of three allocations:


Native Languages $8 .9 million

Native Studies $21 .2 million

Per-pupil amount $20 .7 million

Total $50.8 million

• The Native Languages allocation supports elementary and secondary Native Language programs. At the elementary level, funding is based on the number of pupils enrolled in the Native Language program and the average daily minutes of instruction. At the secondary level, funding is provided for each Grade 9 to 12 pupil enrolled in a credit course.

• The Native Studies allocation supports secondary credit courses in Native Studies, providing a per-pupil amount for Grade 9 to 12 students.

• The per-pupil amount supports Aboriginal students, and reflects the estimated percentage of Aboriginal students in a board’s schools, based on 2006 census data. A weighting factor doubles the per-pupil amount when the estimated percentage of Aboriginal pupils in a board is 7.5% or greater but less than 15%, and triples it when the percentage is 15% or greater.


Safe and Accepting Schools SupplementThis funding supports the Safe Schools Strategy and provides targeted support to secondary schools in priority urban neighbourhoods. The grant, made up of two allocations, is projected to total $47.0 million in 2015-16:


Safe and Accepting Schools $37 .0 million

Urban and Priority High Schools $10 .0 million

Total $47.0 million

• The Safe and Accepting Schools allocation includes two components. One supports non-teaching staff such as social workers, child and youth workers, psychologists, and attendance counsellors who work to prevent and mitigate risks to the school environment. The other supports programs for long-term suspended and expelled students, and prevention and inter-vention resources. Both components provide a per-pupil amount and also reflect a board’s demographic characteristics and dispersion distance.

• The Urban and Priority High Schools allocation helps boards respond to challenges in select secondary schools, such as a lack of community resources, poverty, conflict with the law, or a combination of these factors.


CONCLUSIONDetermining the best way to allocate funding to support Achieving Excellence and to put public resources to the most effective use in our school system is an ongoing process.

Funding arrangements will and must continue to change. For an effective education system, we must stay attuned to and gather information on the evolving needs of students, the costs that boards face, and how well our funding approaches support the outcomes we want from the system.

The ministry will continue to engage with school boards and others to ensure the collection and sharing of insights and information to support the goal of making the best possible decisions.

This guide has provided high-level summaries of grants, their purposes and their funding mechanisms. It also set out how several elements of grants are in transition:

• This guide is not intended to describe the legal requirements around grant amounts or allocation methods. Readers looking for that information should consult the Grants for Student Needs – Legislative Grants for the 2015-2016 School Board Fiscal Year regulation. The Education Funding Technical Paper for 2015-16 provides additional information on the calculations underlying many of the grants and more information about grants not discussed in detail here.


http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/source/regs/english/2014/elaws_src_regs_r14076_e.htm

http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/source/regs/english/2014/elaws_src_regs_r14076_e.htm

http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/funding/1415/Technical14_15.pdf


APPENDIXThis guide groups grants by the outcomes they are intended to support. In contrast, the GSN technical paper, which describes the grant calculations in more detail, uses only two broad categories: foundation grants and special purpose grants.

Foundation grants provide each board with funding based on number of students and number of schools. Special purpose grants, which provide additional funding to meet specific needs, generally use data more reflective of local conditions and students. In the Technical paper these grants are set out as a list.

The technical paper is available on the ministry website at www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/funding

http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/funding

TAB 10

Summary of Tenant and Lease Information

School Accommodation Review Data

SCHOOL TENANT/LICENSEE USE LEASED and/or LICENCED PREMISESTERM and/or RENEWAL TERM OF LEASE

and/or LICENSELEASE EXPIRY DATE

Before & After School Program (School Age 6‐12 yrs old) Atrium 10 month self‐renewing Licence Agreement

FDK Before & After School Program Rooms 203, 204, 205, 206 10 month self‐renewing Licence Agreement

Before & After School Program (School Age 6‐12 yrs old) Room 107 10 month self‐renewing Licence Agreement

FDK Before & After School Program Rooms 118A, 120, 221 10 month self‐renewing Licence Agreement

Lease Child Care Rooms 116, 117, 110 1 year August 31, 2015

Before & After School Program (School Age 6‐12 yrs old) Stage 10 month self‐renewing Licence Agreement

FDK Before & After School Program Rooms 118, 119 10 month self‐renewing Licence Agreement

*There is no tenant or licensee in St. Louis or St. Leo.

Brief summary on Before and After School Program Licence Agreements:

Before and After School programs (or just After School Programs) in TCDSB schools operate under 10‐month Licence Agreements with the term commencing September 1st and ending June 30th. The Licence Agreement is automatically renewed on an annual basis for a further ten months commencing on September 1st of each year. The Licence Agreement can be terminated by either party with 30 days prior written notice from the last day of the term or renewal term (June 30th/September 1st). Access times are 7:00 a.m. to school morning bell time and then school afternoon bell time until 6:00 p.m. Any additional access to the School by the Licensee during either weekends, evenings, March break, PA days and summer holidays or outside the normal caretaking hours of operation will require the Licensee to obtain a Permit for the space and pay all associated costs including any additional caretaking costs.

Our Lady of Sorrows

Holy Angels

St. Mark

YMCA of Greater Toronto

PLASP

Park Lawn Preschool Inc.

TAB 11

Holy Angels Community Use/Permits

Participation

5,808.50

13,351

574

0201401682‐2 Multi Purpose Room ‐ 109

Multi Purpose Room ‐ 109

0201401181‐1 Classroom ‐ 103

Classroom ‐ 104

Classroom ‐ 114Classroom ‐ 115

Classroom ‐ 116

Classroom ‐ 117

Classroom ‐ 121

Staff Room ‐ 136

0201402130‐1 Parking Lot ‐ PARK

MCCLUSKEY TRANSPORTATION 0201402128‐1 Parking Lot ‐ PARK

Polish Scouting Association 2 0201401664‐1 Classroom ‐ 103

Classroom ‐ 104

Classroom ‐ 115

Classroom ‐ 116

Classroom ‐ 117


0201401664‐3 Classroom ‐ 114

The Etobicoke Basketball Association (EBA) 0201401682‐1 Multi Purpose Room ‐ 109

ISLINGTON RANGERS SOCCER LEAGUE 0201401662‐1 Multi Purpose Room ‐ 109


ISLINGTON RANGERS SOCCER LEAGUE 0201401662‐1 Multi Purpose Room ‐ 109

02/05/2015 6:00PM ‐10:00PM ‐ Holy Angels Catholic School

02/04/2015 6:00PM ‐ 9:00PM ‐ Holy Angels Catholic School

02/03/2015 6:00PM ‐10:00PM ‐ Holy Angels Catholic School

02/03/2015 4:30PM ‐ 02/04/2015 7:30AM ‐ Holy Angels Catholic School



First Student Canada‐Thornhill Branch



02/07/2015 8:30AM ‐ 2:30PM ‐ Holy Angels Catholic School

Ukrainian Cultural Centre Toronto‐Yuri Lypa

02/07/2015 9:30AM ‐12:30PM ‐ Holy Angels Catholic School

The Etobicoke Basketball Association (EBA)

Number of permit hours

Number of participants

Number of Permit Occurrences

Our Lady of Sorrows Community Use/Permits

ParticipationNumber of permit hours 7,057.50Number of participants 30,837

Number of Permit Occurrences 808

Tsiopa Palijiw Ukrainian SchoolDaria Bilyj,Taras Gula/

(416)538‐2886 0201400291‐4 Antrium

AntriumClassroom ‐ 204Classroom ‐ 205Classroom ‐ 207Classroom ‐ 208Classroom ‐ 209Classroom ‐ 214Classroom ‐ 305Classroom ‐ 308Classroom ‐ 309Classroom ‐ 313Classroom ‐ 314Classroom ‐ 315Kindergarten ‐ 108Kindergarten ‐ 230Kindergarten ‐ 231Staff Room ‐ 222


0201401551‐4 Hall ‐ 101

First Student Canada (ULC) ‐ Etobicoke Div.


0201402567‐1 Parking Lot ‐ PARK0201402180‐1 Parking Lot ‐ PARK

Tsiopa Palijiw Ukrainian School 0201400291‐5 Hall ‐ 101



TOPS Volleyball 0201402836‐1 Multi Purpose Room ‐ 228

Toronto Volleyball Academy 0201400080‐2 Multi Purpose Room ‐ 228

Learning Disabilities Assoc. Toronto 0201402899‐1 Classroom ‐ 208

Our Lady Of Sorrows Catholic School 0201405218‐1 Antrium

Toronto Volleyball Academy 0201400080‐2 Multi Purpose Room ‐ 228

Our Lady Of Sorrows Catholic School 0201402183‐1 Multi Purpose Room ‐ 22802/03/2015 4:30PM ‐ 02/04/2015 7:00AM ‐ Our Lady Of Sorrows Catholic School

02/05/2015 6:00PM ‐ 8:00PM ‐ Our Lady Of Sorrows Catholic School

02/05/2015 4:30PM ‐ 02/06/2015 7:00AM ‐ Our Lady Of Sorrows Catholic School


02/04/2015 6:00PM ‐10:00PM ‐ Our Lady Of Sorrows Catholic School









02/07/2015 8:30AM ‐ 1:30PM ‐ Our Lady Of Sorrows Catholic School


Our Lady of Sorrows Church 0201401338‐1 Classroom ‐ 204Classroom ‐ 205Classroom ‐ 207Classroom ‐ 208Classroom ‐ 209Classroom ‐ 214Classroom ‐ 305Classroom ‐ 308Classroom ‐ 309Classroom ‐ 313Classroom ‐ 314Classroom ‐ 315Health Room ‐ 312Kindergarten ‐ 108

0201401338‐2 Classroom ‐ 204Classroom ‐ 205Classroom ‐ 207Classroom ‐ 208Classroom ‐ 209Classroom ‐ 214Classroom ‐ 305Classroom ‐ 308Classroom ‐ 309Classroom ‐ 313Classroom ‐ 314Classroom ‐ 315Health Room ‐ 312Kindergarten ‐ 108

Royal York FC 2012 0201402185‐1 Multi Purpose Room ‐ 228

SCARBOROUGH COUGARS SOCCER 0201401548‐1 Multi Purpose Room ‐ 228



02/01/2015 11:30AM ‐ 3:30PM ‐ Our Lady Of Sorrows Catholic School

St. Leo Community Use/Permits

Participation

0201401630‐1 Classroom ‐ 105

Classroom ‐ 105

Classroom ‐ 107A

Classroom ‐ 203

Classroom ‐ 204

Classroom ‐ 205

Classroom ‐ 211

Library ‐ 236


Office ‐ 222

Staff Room ‐ 217


0201401623‐2 Library ‐ 236





Number of permit hours 11,941.00Number of participants 12,589

Number of Permit Occurrences 995

02/07/2015 9:00AM ‐12:30PM ‐ St. Leo Catholic School TCDSB ‐ International Languages

02/05/2015 6:00PM ‐10:00PM ‐ St. Leo Catholic School

St. Leo Catholic School

02/01/2015 4:30PM ‐ 02/02/2015 7:00AM ‐ St. Leo Catholic School

First Student Canada (ULC) ‐ Etobicoke Div.


MCCLUSKEY TRANSPORTATION



02/04/2015 6:30PM ‐ 9:00PM ‐ St. Leo Catholic School

St. Leo Catholic School


Etobicoke Lakeshore Volleyball Club (ELVC)


St. Louis Community Use/Permits

Number of permit hours 342.5 Number of participants 3,100 Number of Permit Occurrences 110

Royal York FC 2012 0201403504‐1 Multi Purpose Room ‐ 117Multi Purpose Room ‐ 117

Youth Sports 0201402247‐2 Multi Purpose Room ‐ 117


The Etobicoke Basketball Association (EBA) 0201401620‐1 Multi Purpose Room ‐ 11702/02/2015 6:00PM ‐10:00PM ‐ St. Louis Catholic School

Participation

02/06/2015 6:00PM ‐ 9:30PM ‐ St. Louis Catholic School

02/05/2015 6:30PM ‐ 8:30PM ‐ St. Louis Catholic School

02/04/2015 6:00PM ‐10:00PM ‐ St. Louis Catholic School

St. Mark Community Use/Permits

Participation1,842.508,460347



0201400346‐1 Change Room ‐ 107

Change Room ‐ 108


Staff Room ‐ 104

Washroom ‐ 112

Washroom ‐ 113


02/02/2015 8:30PM ‐10:00PM ‐ St. Mark Catholic School

Kevin Samanica

St. Mark Catholic School

02/06/2015 6:00PM ‐ 7:30PM ‐ St. Mark Catholic School

Dr. W Yim & Associates

02/05/2015 6:00PM ‐10:00PM ‐ St. Mark Catholic School

Number of Permit Occurrences

Number of permit hoursNumber of participants

TAB 12

Holy Angels65 JUTLAND RD

2.94Acres

ISLIN

GTON

AVE

JUTLAND RD

YORKVIEW DR

EDGECROFT RD

AMBLESIDE AVE

HOLY ANGELS SCHOOL SITE - ORTHO IMAGERY (2011) ±

Imagery Source: City of Toronto OrthoImagery (http://map.toronto.ca)0 8040 Meters TCDSB Planning Services

March 2015

Our Lady of Sorrows32 MONTGOMERY RD

4.23AcresMONTGOMERY RD

WILGAR RD

BELVEDERE BLVD

MIMICO CREEK TRAIL

OUR LADY OF SORROWS SCHOOL SITE - ORTHO IMAGERY (2011) ±


March 2015

St. Leo165 STANLEY AVE

1.95Acres

ROYA

L YOR

K RD

STANLEY AVE

ELIZA

BETH

ST

LANE

E R

OYAL

YORK

N ST

ANLE

Y

DRUMMOND ST

ST. LEO SCHOOL SITE - ORTHO IMAGERY (2011) ±


March 2015

St. Louis11 MORGAN AVE

1.46AcresMORG

AN AV

E

PENH

URST

AVE

LANE S THE QUEENSWAY W PENHURST

ST. LOUIS SCHOOL SITE - ORTHO IMAGERY (2011) ±


March 2015

St. Mark45 CLOVERHILL RD

2.32Acres

CANNON RD

CLOV

ERHI

LL R

D

HEATHERDALE RD

CHAD

BURN

RD

GUTH

RIE A

VE

ST. MARK SCHOOL SITE - ORTHO IMAGERY (2011) ±


March 2015

TAB 13

³S

³E

³E

#*#*

#*#* #*") #* !(

#*#* #*

#*#*

#*!(

#*

#*#*#*#*

#*

#*#*

#*

#*

!(#*#*!(#*#*")

#*")")

#*

!(

#*

#*")

#*

#*#*

#*

#*

!(

#*#* #*

#*#*

#*

#*#*")

!(

#*#*

#*#*

")")

#*

#*#*

#*

#*

#*

")

#*

!(

!(

#*#*#*#*

#*

#*#*!(

#*")

#*

#*

#*

")

#*#*

#*#*

")

#*#*

#*!(

#*

#*#*

#*#*

#*#*#*

#*#*#*

!(

")

#*#*

#*#*

#*#*

#*#*#*

#*!(

#*")

#*#*

#*")

#*

!(

#*

#*

#*#*

#*

#*!(

#*!(

#*

#*")

#*

#*

#*

#*#*

!(

#*#*

#*

#*

#*#*

#*

#*!(

#*#*

#*

#*

!(

#*#*#*")

!(

#*#*#*#*#*#* #*

#*

#*#*")#*#*#*#*#*!( #*#*!(

#*")#*

#*#*

#*

")

#*

#*

#*

")

#*#* #*#*

!(")

#*

!(

#*#*

#*

#*#*

#*#*

#*

#*#*

#*!( ") #*")#*

")

!(

#*")

!(

#*

")

#*#* #*#*#*#*

#*#*

#*

#*#*

#*#*

#*

")

#*#*#*#*

#*#*#*")

")

#*#*

#*#*#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

!(

#*!(

#*")")

#*

#*

#* #*#*

#*#*

#*

#*

#*#*#*

#*

#*#*

#*

#*#*

")

#*

St. Louis2014 ENR: 2152014 OTG: 3582014 UTL: 60%Portables: 0

Holy Angels2014 ENR: 4112014 OTG: 372

2014 UTL: 110%Portables: 0

Bishop Allen2014 ENR: 15202014 OTG: 7172014 UTL: 212%Portables: 20

Moyne

s Av

e

S to ck Av

e

Six Point Rd

Chauncey Ave

Advance Rd

Mendota Rd

Wickm

an Rd

Bering Ave

Oakfield Dr

Dayton Av

e

Cormier

Hts

Kenridge Ave

Badger Dr

Berry Rd

Norseman St

Alex Fishe

r Ter

Arno

l d St

Milton

St

R oy al York Rd

Spring

Garden Rd

Manitoba St

Inverl e

igh Dr

Dalesford Rd

San Re

mo Ter

Winslow

St

Wesl ey St

Penh

urstAv

e

Delroy Dr

Elderidge Ave

Sinclair St

Cochr

ane D

r

Lady

Ban

k Rd

Ln N The Queensway W Islington

Braw

ley Av

e

Nordin Av

e

Holb ro o

ke Ave

Rothsay Av

e

Berl Av

e

C hartw

ell R

d

Plyw

o od Pl

StLawrenceAv

e

Thompson Ave

Glenellen Dr W

Daniels St

Eagle R d

Berl Ave

Canm

otor Ave

Athol Ave

Glenroy Ave

Inverness Ave

Seveno

aksAv

e

Dalesford Rd

Edgecroft Rd

Stanmills Rd

North Queen St

Oxford St

Norseman St

Oxford St

Tenby St

Loma Rd

Kello

gg St

Leland Ave

Lothian Av

e

Distin

Ave

Lillibe

t Rd

A lan

Ave

Ambleside Ave

Colwy n

Rd

Sunnydale Dr

Castlebar Rd

NorthropRd

Elford Blvd

Gladfern Rd

Olivewood Rd

Sunnylea Ave W

Winston Grv

Eastwick Rd

Fairmar Ave

Culnan

Ave

ReidManor

Glenaden Ave W

Subway Cre

s

Goo

d rich Rd

Wickman Rd

Beau

court R

d

Ashm

ore Av

eFordhouse Blvd

Larstone Ave

Jutland Rd

Plast ics Av

e

Taym

all A

ve

Titan Rd

Hum

berv aleBlvd

Warnica Ave

Royal YorkRd

Royal York Rd

Pri nce Edw

ard Dr S

Fernalroy Blvd

Queen Elizabeth Blvd

Queen

Eliza

beth

Blvd

Cardigan Rd

Uno

Dr

Coney Rd

Plywood Pl

Bentley Dr

Shaw

bridge Ave

V ansco Rd

Lothian Av

e

Zorra St

Velm

a Dr

Avon Park Dr

GalaLane

Lillibet Rd

Plywood PlWickman Rd

Que

e nsw

ayLion

sCrt

Dorc hester A

v e

Kirk Bradden Rd W

Evans Ave

The Queensway

KiplingAve

Dunda

s St W

KiplingAv

e

Islington Ave

Islin

gton

Ave

F G GARDINER XY E F G GARDINER XY W

GARDINER X W GARDINER C W

#*#*")

#* #*#*#*

#*#*#*#*#*

#*") #*!(

#*

#*

#*#*#*!(#*#*#*#*#*#*#*

!(#*#*#*")#*!(

#*#*#*#*#*#*

#*!(#*#*#*#*#* #*#*#*#*#*!(#*#*!(#*#*")#*")")#*

#*#*!(

#*#*#*")#*#*#*#*#*!(#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#* #*#*")

!(#*#*#*#*")")#*#*#*#*#*#*")#*!(!(#*#*#*#*#*#*#*!(#*")#*#*#*")#*#*#*#*#*#*") #*#*#*!(#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*!(") #*#*#*#*#* #*#*#*#*#*#*#*!(#*")#*

")#* #*")#*!(#* #*#*#* #*#*!(#*!(#*#*") #*#*

#*

#*

#*#*#*!(#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*!(#*#*#*#*!(#*#*#*")!(#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*")#*#*#*#*#*!(#*#*!(#*")#*

#*

#*#*

#*#*

#*")#*#*#*#*#*")

#*#*#*")#*#*#*#*!(")#*!(#*#*#*#*

#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*!(")#*

#*")#*")!(#*")!(#*")

#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#* ")#*#*#*#*#*#*#*")")#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*!(#*!(

#*#*")")#*#*#*

#*#*#*#*

#*") #*#*#*#*")!( #*#*#*#*#*#*#*

#*#*#*

#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#* #*#*#*#*#*#*#*")#*#*#*")

#*#*

#* #*") !(#*#*

#*!(

#*#*#*

#*

#*

#*#*

#* #*#* #*

#*#*

#*#*

#*!(#*

")!(

#*#*#*

#*

±

0 0.6 1.2 Kilometers

October 31, 2014 Trillium EnrolmentInside or Outside Boundary Analysis

Holy Angels Fixed Attendance Boundary

Prepared by: TCDSB Planning ServicesDate: January 28, 2015

Note(s): 1) Enrolment data extracted from Trillium, October 31, 2014. Data has not been approved by OnSis and may differ slightly from official counts produced in 2014.2) OTG, utilization and portable data is current as of January 28, 2015 and is subject to change.3) Students with an incomplete address, no address or an address outside of the GTA entered in Trillium cannot be geocoded, as a result the students are omitted from the in/out catchment analysis totals.4) Where there is more than one student living at a residential address, there will be an overlap of symbols since there is only one address point that matches multiple student's home address.

Gr 1 to Gr 8 Students

JK Students

SK Students

Student with Sibling

Other FixedAttendanceBoundaries

Streets

Water & Rivers

Parkland

School FixedAttendance Boundary

³E Elementary Schools

³S Secondary Schools#*

")

!(

BOUNDARY SUMMARY

Grades # % # %JK 27 61% 17 39%SK 27 68% 13 33%

Grade 1 to 8 189 58% 138 42%

Total 243 59% 168 41% Total Enrolment = 411Holy Angels

# % # %Outside Boundary JKs 10 59% 7 41%

Outside of Boundary SKs 4 31% 9 69%Outside of Boundary Gr 1 to 8 74 54% 64 46%Outside of Boundary Total 88 52% 80 48%

JKs SKs Gr. 1 to 8

Total JKs SKs Gr. 1 to 8

Total

Totals: 44 40 327 411 23 15 189 227Holy Angels 27 27 189 243 13 11 115 139Our Lady of Sorrows 8 3 36 47 4 0 18 22St. Louis 3 1 34 38 1 0 23 24Greater Toronto Area 3 3 15 21 2 1 9 12St. Leo 0 3 6 9 0 1 5 6St. Mark 1 0 8 9 1 0 5 6St. Ambrose 1 0 5 6 1 0 1 2St. Elizabeth 0 0 4 4 0 0 2 2St. Stephen 1 1 2 4 1 1 2 4St. Clement 0 0 3 3 0 0 2 2

Other Attendance Boundaries 0 2 25 27 0 1 7 8

ATTENDANCE BOUNDARYTotal Students Total Students with Sibling

Holy Angels Pupil Distribution

Inside of Boundary

Outside of Boundary

OUTSIDE BOUNDARYSIBLING SUMMARY

With Sibling Without Sibling

In, 243, 59%

Out, 168, 41%

Sib‐No48%

Sib‐Yes52%

³

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

#*

#*#*

#*

#*")

#*#*

#*#*#*#*#*#*#*")!(#*")!(!(

#*

")!(#*#*#*#*

#*

#*#*")

#*#*#*

#*#*#*#*

#*#*#*")#*

#*#*

#*#*

#*#*#*

#*

#*

#*#*#*#*

#*

#*#*#*!(

#*

#*

#*

#*#*#*#*

#*")

#*

#*

")

#*#*!(

!(

#*

#*

!(

#*

#*#*#*#*#*

#*!(#*

#*#*

#*#*

")

#*")

#*#*#*

#*#*

#*

#*

#*#*

#*#*

#*#*#*#*

#*#*#*

#*")#*#*#*#*

#*")

#*#*

#*")

#*#*!(

#*!(

#*

#*#*#*#*#*

")

#*#*

#*#*#*#*")

#*#*!(

#*

#*

")!(#*

#*#*

#*#*

#*

!(

#*#*#*

#*#*#*

#*

#*#*

#*

#*

#*

#*#*#*#*#*

#*#*

#*#*#*

!(

")

#*")

#*")

#*

#*

#*#*

#*

#*

#*#*#*")")

#*

")")

#*

#*

!(

")

#*

#*#*#*")

#*!(#*

#*#*

#*#*#*

#*

#*#*")

#*#*

#*

#*

#*#*

#*

#*#*")

#*

#*#*

")

#*")

#*

#*")

")

!(

")#*

#*#*")

#*

#*#*#*

#*#*#*")

#*#*

#*

#*

#*

#*#*

#*#*#*#*#*")")")

#*

#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*")!(!(

#*

#*#*#*")

")#*#*

#*!(

#*#*#*

#*#*#*")!(#*#*

#*#*

#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*")

#*!( #*#*#*#*#*#*

#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*")")!(!(!(

#*

#*#*

#*

#*

#*#*")

#*#*#*#*#*

#*#*#*

#*!(!(

#*#*#*#*#*!(

#*

#*#*

")#*

!(

#*#*#*#*#*")

#*

#*#*#*

#*

#*#*#*")

#*

#*

#*

#*#*

#*

#*#*#*

#*#*#*

#*#*#*#*#*!(

#*

#*#*

#*#*

#*!(

#*#*#*#*#*!( #*#*

")!(

#*!(

#*

!(

#*

#*")#*

#*!(

#*#*

#*#*

#*

#*#*")!(

#*

#*")

#*

#*

#*

#*#*

#*#*

#*

#*")#*#*

#*

")

#*#*

#*")

#*#*

#*#*

#*

#*#*#*

#*

#*

#*#*")#*

#*#*

#*

#*

#*")!(

#*#*

")

#*#*

#*")#*#*!(

!(#*#*#*#*

#*

") #*")!(

#*#*!(#*#*#*#*

#*

#*

#*

#*#*

#*#*")#*

!(

#*")

#*#*

#*#*#*#*

#*

#*!(

#*

#*#*

#*#*#* #*")

#*!(

#*")

#*#*

#*")#*#*#*

#*#*#*

")

#*#*

#* #*!(

#*

!(

#*#*#*#*

#*

#*#*#*#*#*#*

#*#*#*#*

#*!( #*#*

#*

#*!(#*!(

#*

#*#*

#*#*

#*

")!(

#*#*#*")

#*

#*#*

!(#*#*

#*

#*#*#*#*

#*#*#*#*

#*

!(

#*#*#*

#*

#*

#*#*#*#*#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*#*#*

#*#*#*#*#*#*!(

")

#*

!(

#*#*!(

#*#*!(

#*#*

#*#*#* #*#*

#*#*#*

#*#*#*

#*#* #*#*#*

#*

#*

#*")")

#*#*#*

#*

#*#*

#*#*#*#*

#*#*#*

#*#*!(

#*

#*#*#*

!(#*#*#* #*

!( #*

#*

#*!(#*")

#*

#*#*#*#*

#*#*

#*

#*#*#*#*#*

#*

#*#*#* #*#* #*#*!(

#*#*

#*

#* #*#*#*#*#*#*

!(

#*#* ")

#*!(

#*

Our Lady of Peace2014 ENR: 6282014 OTG: 5212014 UTL: 121%Portables: 3

Our Lady of Sorrows2014 ENR: 7862014 OTG: 542


St. Pius X2014 ENR: 4892014 OTG: 449


Josyf Cardinal Slipyj2014 ENR: 5872014 OTG: 5622014 UTL: 104%Portables: 5 St. Gregory

2014 ENR: 6982014 OTG: 5802014 UTL: 120%Portables: 0

James Culnan2014 ENR: 4312014 OTG: 6192014 UTL: 70%Portables: 0

St. James2014 ENR: 2262014 OTG: 3282014 UTL: 69%Portables: 0

AstoriaAve

Lambton Ave

Six Point Rd

AntiochDr

Princess AnneCres

WillardAv

e

Chauncey Ave

Advance Rd

Keane Ave

BlackCreek Blvd

Armad

aleAv

e

Florence

Cres

Baby Point Rd

Swan Ave

Bering Ave

Rathburn Rd

Munster Ave

Edenbridge Dr

Longfield Rd

Norseman St

Martin

Grove

Rd

Pri nce

EdwardDr S

Prince George Dr

AvonhurstRd

Halford

Ave

RoyalYorkRd

East Dr

Wingrove Hill

St Mark's Rd

Wim

blet onRd

St Alba

ns Rd

The Kingsway

Eileen Ave

AngleseyBlvd

Raymond Ave

Humberview Rd

Methuen Ave

Ivy

Lea Cres

SouthKingsw

ay

Shorncliffe

Rd

South Kingslea Dr

TheEastMall

Firwood Cres

Princes

s Marga

retBlvd

Terry Dr

Paula rt D

r

Haney Ave

Evan

sAv

e

Harshaw Ave

Morningside Ave

EdenbrookHill

WillardAv

e

Mo u

ldA v

e

Waller Ave

Sunnylea Ave E

Clissol d

Rd

WoodcrestDr

Winde

rme reAv

e

A rmad

a leA v

e

Clived

enAv

e

Brule

Gdn

s

Montye Ave

Durie

St

Woo

dgateDr

Glenaden Ave E

Langm

uir Cres

TheEastMall Pritchard Ave

Winde

rmereAv

e

Allanhurst Dr

BataviaA v

e

Subway

Cres

OldDundasS

t

TwyfordRd

Princess

Marga

retBlv

d

Claymore Dr

AcornAve

Bexle y

Cres

Orrell Ave

Aylesbury Rd Alliance Ave

LloydManor

Rd

Bernice CresBywood Dr

OldMill Rd

Kuhl

Ave

Hum

ber T

rl

R ive rcov e

Dr

Durie

St

Norseman St

Foxwell St

KiplingAv

e

Lynnford Dr

Dewitt Rd

Vassar

Dr

Remington

Dr

NorthDr

Brum

ellA

ve

Trem

ont R

d

Sabine Rd

Grenview

Blvd

N

Ovida Ave

Greenfield Dr

GrayAv

eLaviniaAv

e

LothianAv

e

Smithw

oodDr

OldhamRd

Mervyn Ave

Corbett Ave

Donalbert Rd

StGeorge'sRd

Vang

u ard

Dr

Ostend Ave

Dorl enAv

e

Edenvale

Cres

Hillc ro ft D

r

Swan Ave

Han

del St

Taylorwood Dr

Riverside

Dr

Bill in g

h am

Rd

Beechw

oodAv

e

Westridge Rd

AuklandRd

Due

rnSt

Dun

edin

Dr

GlamisAv

e

Jopli ngAv

eN

EagleRd

Lesmar Dr

Grand

v il le

Ave

Kingh o

r nAv

e

Bot field

Ave

C hryessa

Ave

C ro n

inDr

Blaketon

R d

Cloverdale Mall

Northam

pton

Dr

BirchcroftRd

TheKingsw

ay

Olivewood Rd

Wed

gewo o

dDr

Knowland Dr

Millburn Dr

Ln N Pritchard E Jane

Poplar

Ave

Ln N Corbett E Jane

YarnRd

White Ave

Vickers Rd

Nora Rd

Mattic

e Rd

Gaylord Ave

Elliott Ave

Warwo o

dR d

CentreDr

BeresfordAv

e

Runn

ymed

eRd

Wo o

d ban

kR d

F re n

c hAv

e

Fontenay

Crt

Graywood Dr

BeresfordAv

e

Vickson Crt

Apple b

yR d

Knoll Dr

Woolner Ave

AbileneDr

The East Mall

Winde

rmereAv

e

Westglen

Cres

ScarlettRd

Wilm

arRd

Kingsway

Cres

Mart in

Grove

Rd

Martin

Grove

Rd

RoyalYo rkRd

Ha libu rt onA v

e

R oc kclif feBlv d

Fernalroy Blvd

CastletonAv

e

RiversideDr

BeaverBend Cres

Cardigan Rd

The Kingsway

Walford

Rd

Cynthia R

d

Baby

Point

Cres

GlenAgar

Dr

Dalrymple Dr

West Deane

ParkDr

Eastglen

Cres

GoochAve

Mart in

Grove

Rd

FairlinDr

Latton

Rd

LloydMan

o rRd

Riverw

ood

Pkwy

RivercrestRd

Durie

StDurie

St

Shave r

AveS

Lambeth Rd

SilverhillDr

Silverh illDr

L au re lA v

eL au re lA v

e

SirWilliam

s

Lane

HarjolynDr

RoyalavonCres

Shave r

A veN

Eden

Valley Dr

RavenscrestDr

Reno

wnRd

Strath Ave

Meado

wba

nkR d

Lorraine Gdns

Ash fordDr

Tromley

Dr

WatsonAv

e

Edgevalley Dr

Abinger Cres

Charlesto n

Rd

Shawbridge

Ave

T heE astMall

Sandcliff Rd

Pren

nanA v

e

Thornh

illAv

e

Agar Cres

RobingladeDr

OrkneyCres

Lorm

arDr

C ron

i nDr

Ravens

bourne

CresJill Cres

Rockingham Dr

FriarsLane

Ashwood Cres

Burnelm

Dr

Totteridge Rd

Blair Athol Cre

s

Pheasant Lane

Queen Anne Rd

Bloor St W

Dundas St W

Dunda

s St W

Bloor St W

Bloor St W

St Clair Ave W

Eglinton Ave W

Islin

gton

Ave

Isl in

g ton

A ve

KiplingAv

e

#*#*#*#*#* #*

#*#*#*")!(#*#*

#*#* #*#*#*#*")#*#*#*#*

#*#* #*#*

#*")

#*

#*

#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*")!(#*")!(!(

#*")!(#*#*#*#*#*#*#*")

#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*")#*#*#*#*#*

#*#*#*#*")#*#*#*#*#*#* #*#*#*#*!( #*#*#*

#*#*#*#*#*")#* #*

")#*#*!(

!(#*#*!(#*#*#*#*#*#*#*!(#* #*#*#*#*")

#*")#*#*#*#*#*

#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*")#*#*#*#*#*")#*#*#*")#*#*!( #*!(#*#*#*#*#*#*")#*#*#*#*#*#*")#*#*!( #*#*

")!(#*#*#*#*#*#* !(

#*#*#*#*#*#*#* #*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*!(")#*")#*")#*

#* #*#*#*#*#*#*#*")") #*")") #*

#*!(

")#*

#*#*#*") #*!(#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*")#*#* #*#*#*#*#*#*#*")#* #*#*")#*")#*#*") ")!(")#*#*#*")#*#*#*#*#*#*#*")

#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*")")") #*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*")!(!(#*#*#*#*")")#*#*

#*!(#*#*#*#*#*#*")!(#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*") #*!(#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*")")!(!(!(

#*

#*#*#*#*

#*#*#*")#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*!(!(#*#*#*#*#*!(#*#*#* ")#*

!(#*#*#*#*#*")#*

#*#*#*#*#*#*#*") #*#*

#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*

#*#*#*#*#*!(#*#*#*#*#*#*!(#*#*#*#*#*!(#*#*")!(#*!( #*!(

#*#*")#*#*!( #*#*#*#*#*#*#*")!(#*#*") #*#*#*

#*#* #*#*#*#*")#*#*#*")#*#*#*") #*#*#*#* #*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*")#*#*#*#*

#*#*")!(#*#*")#*#*#*")#*#*!(!(#*#*#*#*#*")#*")!(#*#*!(#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*")#*!(#*")#*#*#*#*#*#* #*#*!(#*#*#*#*#*#*#*")#*!(#*")#*#*#*")#*#*#*#*#*#*") #*#*#*#*!( #*!(#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*!(#*#*#*#*!(#*!(

#*#*#*#*#*#*")!( #*#*#*")#*#*#*!(#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*!(#*#*#*

#*

#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#* #*#* #*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*!(")#* !(#*#*!(#*#*!(#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*

#*#*")")#*#*#* #*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*!(#*#*#*#*!(#*#*#*#*!(#*#*#*!(#*")#* #*#*#*#*#*#*

#*#*#*#*#*#*#* #*#*#*#*#*#*#*!(#*#*

#* #*#*#*#*#*#*#*!( #*#*")#*!( #*

#*

#*

#*#*

#*#*#*

#*#*!( #*!(

#* #*

#*

±

0 1 2 Kilometers


Our Lady of Sorrows Fixed Attendance Boundary


Note(s):1) Enrolment data extracted from Trillium, October 31, 2014. Data has not been approved byOnSis and may differ slightly from official counts produced in 2014.2) OTG, utilization and portable data is current as of January 28, 2015 and is subject to change.3) Students with an incomplete address, no address or an address outside of the GTA entered inTrillium cannot be geocoded, as a result the students are omitted from the in/out catchmentanalysis totals.4) Where there is more than one student living at a residential address, there will be an overlapof symbols since there is only one address point that matches multiple student's home address.


JK Students

SK Students



Streets

Water & Rivers

Parkland




")

!(

BOUNDARY SUMMARY

Grades # % # %JK 72 94% 5 6%SK 62 91% 6 9%

Grade 1 to 8 543 85% 98 15%

Total 677 86% 109 14% Total Enrolment = 786Our Lady of Sorrows



JKs SKsGr. 1to 8

Total JKs SKsGr. 1to 8

Total

Totals: 77 68 641 786 18 29 348 395Our Lady of Sorrows 72 62 543 677 15 25 310 350St. Mark 4 3 42 49 3 1 19 23Holy Angels 0 0 14 14 0 0 4 4St. Gregory 0 0 8 8 0 0 3 3Our Lady of Peace 0 0 6 6 0 0 4 4All Saints 0 0 5 5 0 0 2 2St. Ambrose 0 0 5 5 0 0 2 2St. Louis 1 1 1 3 0 1 1 2Nativity of Our Lord 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0St. Maurice 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3



Our Lady of Sorrows Pupil Distribution

Inside ofBoundary

Outside ofBoundary



In,677,86%

Out,109,14%

SibNo59%

SibYes41%

³E

#*#*

")!(

#*!(

!(

#*!(#*!(")

#*

#*#*!(

")

#*

#*

#*#* #*!( #*#*#*#* #*#*

#*

#*")

#* #*

#*#*

#*

#*

")

#*#*

#*

#*

#*

#*#*!( #*#*

#*#*#*#*

#*!(

#*

#*#*")

#*#*

#*#*#*#*#*#*

")")

#*#*") #*

#*#*!(

#*#*#*!(!(

#*

#*

#*!(

#*#*

#*#*#*#*

#*

#*#*#*")!(

#*

#*")#*!(#*

#*

#*")

")

#*#*#*

")!(

#*!(

#*#*#*!(!(#*!(

#*

#*

#*#*

#*

!(

#*#*!(")!(

!(

#*#*")

#*

#*

#*#*#*

#*")

#*!(

#*!(!(

#*")#*

#*!(

")#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*")")!(!(

#*#*#*#*!(#*#*!(

#*#*#*#*#*!(

#*

")

#*")#*

#*#*#*#*#*#*

#*

#*

#*#*

!(#*#*")")

#*

#*")

#*

#*#*

#*

#*

!(

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*#*

St. Leo2014 ENR: 2512014 OTG: 4592014 UTL: 55%

Portables: 0

Marine

Parade

Dr

Third

St

LakeShore D

r

Birmingham St

Second

St

Albert Ave

Que

ens Av

e

Judson St

Second

St

Manitoba St

Dwight Ave

Hay Ave

Mimico Ave

Yachters

Lane

Central St

Fourt h St

Fifth S t

Sixth St Symons St

Fifth St

Melrose St

Simpson Ave

Evans Ave

New Toronto St

Allen Ave

Bluewat

er Crt

Cavell A

ve

Superior Ave

Portland St

Lake Cres

Wesley St

Grand

Ave

Victor

ia St

Lake Cres

Willow

broo

k Rd

Carnarvon Av

e

Morrison St

Garroch Pl

Ogden

Pl

Ha ro ld St

Eton

a Crt

Judson St

Legion Rd

Alan

Ave

Wi nd so r St

Dist in

Ave

Louisa St

Maple Blvd

Eastbourne

Cres

StanleyAve

Station Rd

Ruby Lang Lane

Alexander St

Audle y St

Bucki ngham

St

Melrose St

Douglas Blvd

Algoma St

Dartm

outh

Cres

Whe

atfie

l d Rd

Miles Rd

Geo

rge St

Ln W

Fi fth S B irm

i ngha m

Alden Ave

Merriday St

St Geo

rge St

Victor Ave

Manches

ter St

Ln E Si xth N Bi rm

i ngh

am

Lake Cres

Heman St

Albani St

Vanevery St

Elma St

Struthers St

Park Lawn RdBurlington St

Harbourview

Cres

Harbou

rview

Cres

Third

St

Ou rlan d

Av e

First S

t

HumberBa

yPark

RdW

Murrie St

Lake

ShoreBlvd

W

Islin

gton

Ave

ParkLaw

nRd

#*#*#*") #*#*#* #*#*#*#*

#*

#*")!(#*!(!(#*!(#*!(")#*

#*")#*#*!(")#*#*#*#*#*!(#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*")#*#*#*#*#*#*")#*#*#*#*#*#*#*!(#*#*#*#*#*#*#*!(#*#*#*")#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*")")#*#*")#*#*#*!(#*#*#*!(!(#*#*#*!(#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*")!(#*#*")#*!(#*#*#*")")#*#*#*")!(#*!(#*#*#*!(!(#*!(#*#*#*#*#*!(#*#*!(")!(!(#*#*")#*#*#*#*#*#*")#*!(#*!(!(#*")#*#*!(")#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*")")!(!(#*#*#*#*!(#*#*!(#*#*#*#*#*!(#*")#*")#*

#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*!(#*#*")")#*#*")#*#*#*#*#*!(

#* #*#*#*#*#*

#* #*#*

#* #*

#* #*

#*#*#*

")

#* #*#*#*

#*

±



St. Leo Fixed Attendance Boundary




JK Students

SK Students



Streets

Water & Rivers

Parkland




")

!(

BOUNDARY SUMMARY

Grades # % # %JK 24 80% 6 20%SK 35 100% 0 0%

Grade 1 to 8 146 78% 40 22%

Total 205 82% 46 18% Total Enrolment = 251St. Leo


Outside of Boundary SKs 0 #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0!Outside of Boundary Gr 1 to 8 12 30% 28 70%Outside of Boundary Total 16 35% 30 65%

JKs SKs Gr. 1 to 8

Total JKs SKs Gr. 1 to 8

Total

Totals: 30 35 186 251 14 19 87 120St. Leo 24 35 146 205 10 19 75 104St. Louis 2 0 14 16 2 0 7 9Greater Toronto Area 2 0 3 5 1 0 3 4St. Teresa 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0St. Ambrose 1 0 2 3 1 0 1 2Christ The King 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0James Culnan 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0St. John the Evangelist 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0Holy Angels 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0Transfiguration 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0



St. Leo Pupil Distribution

Inside of Boundary

Outside of Boundary



In, 205, 82%

Out, 46, 18%

Sib‐No65%

Sib‐Yes35%

³S

³E

³E

³E³E

#*

#*

#*!(

!(

#*

#*

#*

#*!(

#*

#*

#*#*#*#*!(

#*#*#*

#* #*#*

#*

#*

#*#*

#*#*

")!(

#*#*#*

#*

#*

#*#* #*#*

#*#*

#*#*!(#*

#*#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

")

#*

#*

")

")#*#* !(#*#*

#*#*

#*

")

#*")

#*

#*#*")#*#*#*#*#*

#* #*

#*#*

#*")!(

#*

#*#*

#*#*#*!(#*#* #*")#*#* #*#*!(

!(!(#*

#*#*

#*#*

#*#*#*")")")")

#*#*#*

#*

#*

!(

#*")

#*#*!(#*#*

#*#*

#*

#*")

#*#*

#*#*

#*")

#*

#*

#*#*#*

#*

")")

#* #*

#*

#*

")#*#*

#*

#*#*#*

#*#*

!(

#*#*!(

#*

#*

#*

#*#*

")

")

#*#*

#*#*

#*

#*

!(

#*

St. Leo2014 ENR: 2512014 OTG: 4592014 UTL: 55%Portables: 0

St. Louis2014 ENR: 2152014 OTG: 3582014 UTL: 60%Portables: 0

Holy Angels2014 ENR: 4112014 OTG: 3722014 UTL: 110%Portables: 0

St. Mark2014 ENR: 2112014 OTG: 2662014 UTL: 79%

Portables: 0


Moyne

s Av

e

Step

hen Dr

Mendota Rd

Fleeceline

Rd

Royal York Rd

Oakfield Dr

Berry Rd

Royal York Rd

Albert Ave

Bradfield Ave

Stonegate Rd

Dalesford Rd

Judson St

Alex Fishe

r Ter

Manitoba St

Hay Ave

Mimico Ave

Yachters

Lane

Guthri e Ave

Oxford St

Inver le

igh Dr

Mil ton

St

Wesley S t

Burm

a Dr

Delroy Dr

Loma Rd

Sinclair St

Cochr

ane D

r

Woo

dfordPark

Rd

Lady

Ban

k Rd

Ln N The Queensway W Islington

Primrose Ave

Simpson Ave

Braw

ley Av

e

Nord in Av

e

Evans Ave

McIntosh A v

e

Woo

l ga r Av e

Rothsay Av

e

Chartw

ell R

d

Ballacaine Dr

Bluewat

er Crt

Allison

Dr

Cavell A

ve

Superior

Ave

StLawrenceA v

e

Portland St

Cannon Rd

Daniels St

Jutland Rd

Judson St

Waniska Ave

Victor

ia St

Canm

otor Ave

Athol Ave

Inverness Ave

River ValleyCr

es

Edgecroft Rd

Oxford St

Oxford St

Willo w

broo

k R d

Tenby St

Carna rvon A v

e

Loma R d

Ga rr oc h Pl

Wesley St

Bethnal Ave

Harold St

Park Lane

Waniska Ave

Eton

a C rt

Nordin Ave

Legion Rd

Aldgate A v

e

Smi th

fi eld Dr

Ho rne

r Av e

Windsor St

Ambleside Ave

Castlebar Rd

Louisa St

Lorne Ave

Lillibe

t Rd

Marine

ParadeDr

StanleyAve

Elford Blvd

Darlin

gton

Dr

Alan

Ave

Distin

Ave

Fiesta Lan

e

Station Rd

Alexander St

Belfry Ave

Glenn

Arthu

r Dr

Bradbrook Rd

Audle y St

Buckingham

St

Eastwick Rd

Minstrel D

r

Stephen Mews

New

holm

Rd

Drummond St

Melrose St

Algoma St

BaysideLane

Ruby Lang Lane

True

ma n

Av e

Wo o

lga r Av e

Connell Crt

Goo

d rich Rd

Beau

court R

d

Fra n

ces A v

e

Merriday St

Yorkview Dr

Ashm

o re A v

e

St Ge o

rge St

O'Don

nel l Av

e

Victor Ave

Manches

ter St

Goldthorne Ave

Plastic

s Av

e

Doddington Dr

Taym

a ll A

v e

Titan Rd

Warnica Ave

Que

ens Av

ePark Lawn

Rd

Queen Elizabeth Blvd

Queen

Eliza

beth

Blvd

Uno

Dr

Coney Rd

Bentley Dr

Burlington

St

Rams bu ry Rd

Harbou

rview Cres

High St

HighS t

Cloverhill Rd

Bonn

yview

Dr

Bonnyview Dr

Ourl an d

Av e

Zorra St

Humber

Bay ParkRd

W

Avon Park Dr

Aberlady Rd

Skelton St

Bell Manor Dr

Magnif icen

t Rd

Dorc he ster A

v e

Smith

Cres

Lake S

hore

Blvd W

Park Lawn Rd

The Queensway

Evans Ave

Islin

gton

Ave

Islin

gton

Ave

F G GARDINER C W

F G GARDINER C E F G GARDINER XY WF G GARDINER XY E

GARDINER X W GARDINER C W

#*!(#*#*#*

")

")#* #*#*

#*

#*

#*#*#*

#*#*#*

#*#*#*#*!(!( #*#*#*#*!(#*#*#*#*#*#*!(#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*")!(#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*!(#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*")#*#*

")")#*#*!(#*#*#*#*#*")#*")#*#*#*")#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*")!(#*#*#*#*#*#*!(#*#*#*")#*#*#*#*!(!(!(#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*")")")")#*#*#*#*#* !(#*")#*#*!(#*#*#*#*#*#*")#*#*#*#*#*")#*#*#*#*#*#*")")#*#*#*#*")#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*!(#*#*!(#*#*#*#*#*")")#*#*#*#*#* #*#*#* #*!(#*#*#*

#*#*

#*

#*#*

#*#*

#*#*

±



St. Louis Fixed Attendance Boundary




JK Students

SK Students



Streets

Water & Rivers

Parkland




")

!(

BOUNDARY SUMMARY

Grades # % # %JK 18 78% 5 22%SK 16 89% 2 11%

Grade 1 to 8 129 74% 45 26%

Total 163 76% 52 24% Total Enrolment = 215St. Louis



JKs SKsGr. 1 to 8

Total JKs SKsGr. 1 to 8

Total

Totals: 23 18 174 215 10 10 92 112St. Louis 18 16 129 163 8 9 65 82Greater Toronto Area 2 1 13 16 1 1 10 12Holy Angels 2 0 7 9 1 0 5 6St. Mark 0 1 7 8 0 0 4 4St. Leo 1 0 4 5 0 0 0 0St. Ambrose 0 0 4 4 0 0 2 2Transfiguration 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0St. Nicholas of Bari 0 0 2 2 0 0 2 2Nativity of Our Lord 0 0 2 2 0 0 2 2Father Serra 0 0 2 2 0 0 2 2



St. Louis Pupil Distribution

Inside of Boundary

Outside of Boundary



In, 163, 76%

Out, 52, 24%

Sib‐No42%

Sib‐Yes58%

³S

³E

³E

³E³E

#*

#*

")#*#*

#*#* ") #*

#*#*

#*

#*!(#*")!(

")!(#*

#*#*#*")#*!(#*#*

#*#* #*

#*

#*#*

!(

#*#*

!(

#*#*

#*#*#*")")

#*!(

#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*")")!(

!( #*#*#*#*#*

#*#*#*

#*!(

#*#*#*

")

#*

!(

#*#*#* #*

#*

#*#*

#*")

")

#*#*#* #*")

#*#*#*

#*#*#*!(

")")#*#*#*#*

!(

#*

#*

#*#*

!(

#*")")

#*#*#*#*#*

#*#*#*#*#*#*")!(#*#*#*#*#*

#*

#*

#*#*!(

#*#*")!(!(#*#*")

#*#*#*!(#*#*")")

#*#*

#* #*#* #*#*#*!(!(

")")

#*

!(#*#*#*#*") #*#*#*#*#*

#*#*!(")")

#*#*!(!(

#*!(

#*

St. Leo2014 ENR: 2512014 OTG: 4592014 UTL: 55%

Portables: 0

St. Louis2014 ENR: 2152014 OTG: 3582014 UTL: 60%

Portables: 0

Holy Angels2014 ENR: 4112014 OTG: 3722014 UTL: 110%Portables: 0

St. Mark2014 ENR: 2112014 OTG: 2662014 UTL: 79%

Portables: 0


Moyne

s Av

e

Step

hen Dr

Mendota Rd

Armad

a le Av

e

Centre Rd

Oakfield Dr

Berry Rd

Cormier

Hts

South Kingsway

Royal Yo rk Rd

Albert Ave

Ellis Ave

Ellis Park Rd

BallacaineDr

Budgell Ter

Springbrook Gdns

Norseman St

Bering Ave

SpringGarden

Rd

Dalesford Rd

Judson St

Brussels St

Manitoba St

DacreCres

Grand

Av e

Van Dusen Blvd

Hay Ave

Mimico Ave

South Kingslea Dr

WendigoWay

Inver le

igh Dr

Mil ton

St

Winslow

St

Wesl ey S t

Rosewood Ave

Burm

a Dr

Delroy Dr

Sinclair St

Cochran

e Dr

Waller Ave

Sunnylea Ave E

Melrose St

Primrose Ave

Morningside Ave

Simpson Ave

Saybrook Ave

Evans Ave

Glenellen Dr E

Holb ro o

ke Ave

Brule

Gdns

OldMill Dr

Cavell A

ve

Glenaden Ave E

Superior Ave

Winderm

ere Ave

HarcroftRd

Portland St

Stonegate Rd

Glenellen Dr W

Daniels St

Claymore Dr

Advance Rd

Kirk Bradden Rd W

Nordin Ave

Bernice Ave

GrenadierHts

Six Point Rd

Waniska Ave

Allison

Dr

Judson St

Canm

oto r Av e

Athol Ave

Inverness Ave

Graystone Gdns

Seveno

aksAv

e

Dalesford Rd

Edgecroft Rd

Mayfield Ave

Chauncey Ave

Stanmills Rd

Oxford St

Willard Av

e

Leamington Ave

Durie St

Van Dusen Blvd

Willow

broo

k Rd

Tenby St

Carnarvon Av

e

Loma Rd

Garroc h Pl

Wesl ey St

Leland Ave

Lavinia Av

e

Bethnal Ave

Lothian Av

e

Haro ld St

RiversideDr

Ostend Ave

Smith

fi el d Dr

Orchard Cres

Southport St

Windsor St

Ambleside Ave

Sunnydale Dr

Castlebar Rd

Louisa St

Elford Blvd

Eagle Rd

A lan

Ave

Dist in

Ave

Station Rd

Sunnylea Ave W

Winston Grv

Belfry Ave

Elsfield Rd

A ud le y St

Innisfree Crt

Fairmar Ave

Mayfield Ave

Drummond St

Mossom Rd

Melrose St

Algoma St

Athlone Dr

ReidManor

Lillibe

t Rd

Larkin Ave

Beau

court R

d

Sto ckb

ridge Ave

Alden Ave

Kings Point Dr

Merriday St

Yorkview Dr

Beresford Av

e

A sh m

o re A v

e

Runn

ymed

e Rd

Titan Rd

Kirk Bradden Rd E

Edwalter Ave

Norseman StSt Geo

rge St

O'Do n

nel l Av

e

Victor Ave

Manches

ter St

Larstone Ave

Plastics A v

e

Doddington Dr

Taym

a ll A

ve

Vanevery St

Hum

bervaleBlvd

West Rd

WestRd

Winderm

ere Ave

Winde

r mere Av

e

Royal York Rd

Royal Yo rk Rd

P rinc e Edw

ard Dr S

Lothian Av

e

Fernalroy Blvd

Colborne

LodgeDr

Que

ens Av

e

Park Lawn Rd

Marine

Parad

eDr

RiversideDr

Queen Elizabeth BlvdEllis

Ave

Ellis Ave

Cardigan Rd

Uno Dr

Coney RdBe

ntley Dr

Burlington

St

Riverw

ood

Pkwy El

lisParkRd

Harbou

rviewCres

High St

BonnyviewDr

Kenn

edy Av

e

Ou rlan d

Av e

Coe Hill Dr

Velm

a Dr

Humber

Bay ParkRdW

Palisades

RipleyAve

Riverside Cres

Evans Ave

Bloor St W

Lake

Shore

Blvd W

The Queensway

Lake Shore BlvdW

TheQueens

way

Jane

St

Islin

gton

Ave

Islin

gton

Ave

F G GARDINER XY WF G GARDINER C W

F G GARDINER C E

#* ")

#*

")#*#*#*#*

#* ")#*#*#*#*")#*#*#*#*

#*!(#*")!(")!(#*#*#*#*")#*!(

#*

#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#* !(#*#*!(#*#* #*#*#*")")#*!(#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*")")!(!(#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*!(#*#*#*")#*!(#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*")")#*#*#*#*")#*#*#*#*#*#*!(")")#*#*#*#*!(#*#*#*#*!(#*")")#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*")!(#*#*#*#*#*#* #*#*#*!(#*#*")!(!(#*#*")#*#*#*!(#*#*")")#*#*#*

#*

#*#*#*#*#*!(!(")")

")

#*!(#*#*#*#*")#*#*#*#*#*#*#*!(")")#*#*!(!(#*!(

#*#*")

#*

#*#*#*#* #*

#*

#*#*

#*

±



St. Mark Fixed Attendance Boundary

Prepared by: TCDSB Planning ServicesDate: February 04, 2015

Note(s): 1) Enrolment data extracted from Trillium, October 31, 2014. Data has not been approved by OnSis and may differ slightly from official counts produced in 2014.2) OTG, utilization and portable data is current as of February 04, 2015 and is subject to change.3) Students with an incomplete address, no address or an address outside of the GTA entered in Trillium cannot be geocoded, as a result the students are omitted from the in/out catchment analysis totals.4) Where there is more than one student living at a residential address, there will be an overlap of symbols since there is only one address point that matches multiple student's home address.


JK Students

SK Students



Streets

Water & Rivers

Parkland




")

!(

BOUNDARY SUMMARY

Grades # % # %JK 25 81% 6 19%SK 26 100% 0 0%

Grade 1 to 8 120 78% 34 22%

Total 171 81% 40 19% Total Enrolment = 211St. Mark



JKs SKsGr. 1 to 8

Total JKs SKsGr. 1 to 8

Total

Totals: 31 26 154 211 11 6 49 66St. Mark 25 26 120 171 10 6 39 55St. Leo 2 0 11 13 0 0 4 4Nativity of Our Lord 1 0 4 5 1 0 3 4St. Pius X 0 0 3 3 0 0 1 1Greater Toronto Area 0 0 3 3 0 0 2 2St. Clement 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0St. Teresa 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0St. Louis 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0St. John the Evangelist 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0Holy Angels 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0



St. Mark Pupil Distribution

Inside of Boundary

Outside of Boundary



In, 171, 81%

Out, 40, 19%

Sib‐No72%

Sib‐Yes28%

TAB 14

³S

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

GARDINER EXPRESSWAY

Holy AngelsFixed Attendance

Boundary

St. Ambrose FixedAttendanceBoundary

St. Louis FixedAttendance

Boundary

St. Mark FixedAttendance

Boundary

Toronto(Other)

PLACID

RD

LORNE AVE

LOMA

RD

DELTA

ST ALAN A

VE

BURM

A DR

DISTIN

AVE

BRUSSELS ST

BELFRY AVEBADGER DR

MENDOTA RD

WESLE

Y ST

ELFORD BLVD

ROTH

SAY AV

EPA

RKER

AVE

ARNO

LD ST

LELAND AVE

EASTW

ICK RD

PLYWOODPL

MINSTRE L DR

KENRIDGE AVEFAIRMAR AVE

BERL

AVE

ZORR

A ST

STOCK

AVE

BRAW

LEY AV

E

AVON PARK DR

BAYSIDELANE

MOYN

ES AV

E

OLIVEWOOD RD

LORAHILLR D

MUNSTE

RA

VEPA

ULAR

T DR ATHLONE DR

LILLIB

ET RD

WINSTON GRV

SILVE

RHILL

DR

LOTH

IAN AV

E

GLENROY AVE

OXFORD ST

SUNNYDALE DR

ABERLADYRD

CANNON RD

WOOL

GAR A

VE

INVER

LEIGH

DR

GUTH

RIE AV

E

MILTO

N ST

WINS

LOW

ST

ADELPH

A DR

KINSDALE BLVD

GOOD

RICHR

D BERRY RD

UNODR

LOCKPORT AVEHILL HEIGHTS RD

CULN

AN AV

E

NORD

INAVE

BRADFIELD AVE

SAYBROOK AVE

TRUE

MANA

V E

BEAUCOURT RD

VELMADR

STOCK

BRIDG

E AVE

FRANC

ES AV

E

KINGS POI NT DR

CONEY RD

WICK

MAN R

D

BERING AVE

OAKFIELD DR

ALGIE A

VE

ASHM

ORE A

VEALGOMA ST

BERNICE AVE

THO M PSON AVE

KIRK BRADDEN RD E

EDWALTER AVE

AMBLESIDE AVECASTLEBAR RD

GLENADEN AVE E

SUNNYLEA AVE E

OVIDA AVE

DORC

H ESTE

R AVE

REID MANOR

MANITOBA ST

SM IT HCRES

CARDIGAN RD

YORKVIEW DR

EDGECROFT RD

LARSTONE AVE

PLASTI

CS AV

E

DODDINGTON DR

TAYMA

LL AVE

SUBWAY CRE S

BONNYVIEWDR

CHAUNCEY AVE

QUEENELIZA B ETH BLVD

VANS

CO RD

FORDHOUSE BLVD

SIX POINT RD

ATOMI

C AVE

ADVANCE RD

NORSEMAN ST

TITAN RD

JUTLAND RD

ROYAL YORKRD

PARK LAWN RD

THE QUEENSWAY

DUNDAS ST W

ISLING

TON A

VE

KIPLIN

G AVE

EVANS AVE

Bishop Allen721 ROYALYORK RD

St. Louis11 MORGANAVE



0 10.5 Km

TCDSB Planning ServicesFeb 2015

±Holy Angels Fixed Attendance Boundary

³S³E Elementary School

Secondary School

³F Future School Location

³T Temporary School Location/Under Construction

³A Alternative/Adult Education

³X Closed School Location

StreetsRailwayWater & RiversParksFixed AttendanceBoundary

Admin Building³B Other Fixed Attendance Boundaries

Hydro Corridor (HEPC)

³S

³S

³S

³S

³E

³E

³E

³E³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³T

All Saints FixedAttendance

Boundary

Holy AngelsFixed AttendanceBoundary

Our Lady of PeaceFixed Attendance

Boundary

Our Lady ofSorrows FixedAttendance Boundary

St. Gregory FixedAttendanceBoundary

St. James FixedAttendance

Boundary

St. Mark FixedAttendanceBoundary

TYRE AVE

VASSA

R DR

WHITE AVE

LILLIB

ET RD

AGAR CRES

BERRY RD

NORA RDMATTICE RD

ORRELL AVE

EILE ENAVE

STEPH

EN DR

PAUL

ART D

R

VELMADR

ELLIOTT AVE

LESMAR DR

CO

NEY RD

FAIRLIN DRBERING AVE

CEN

TRE DR

HUMB

ER TR

L

ELLINS AVE

BERNICE AVE

F INCHLEY RDPERRY CRES

DOWNING ST

STATLER AVE

BR U L E CR

ES

EDG EHILL

RD

POPLARAVE

FRIARSLANEOVIDA AVE

METHUEN AVE

OLD

MILL T ER

REI D MANOR

EAST DR

GREAT OAK DR

AYLESBURY RD

CARDIGANRD

OLD MILL RDSHAV

ER AV

E N

RIV ERCOV E DR

LARSTONEAVE

SWOR

DBILL DR

RIVE

RSIDE CRES

APPLE

BY RD

ASH

WOOD CRES

ROBALDON RD

OLDHAMRD

KNOLL DR

SU

B WAY CRES

BYWOOD DR

BURN

ELMDR

TOTTERIDGE RDABINGER CR

ES

ABILENE DR

ROBIN HOODRD

ALLANBROOKE

DR

NOTTINGHAM DR

CHAUNCEY AVE

WIMBLETON RD

BROO

KSIDE

AVELORRAINE GD NS

PINEHURST C RESB U RR

OWSA

VE

RICHVIEW RD

SIX POINT RD

ORKNEY CRES

HERNE HILL

THE KINGSWAY

VANC

HO CRES

B

L AIR ATHOL CRES

EDENBRIDGE DR

EMMETT AVE

EDINBOROUGHCRT

NORTH DR

ADVANCE RD

CO

URTSFIELD CRES

M A BELLE AVE

EDENVA

LLEY DR

NORSEMAN ST

EDENVALECRES

TITAN RD

POPLARHEIGHTS DR

HOME SMITH PARKRD

VALECREST DR

BLOOR ST W

EGLINTON AVE W

ROYAL

YORK

R D

KIPLIN

GAVE

JANES

T

DUNDAS ST W

ISLING

TON A

VERATHBURN RD

BURNHAMTHORPE RD

SOUTH KIN GSWAY

SCARLE TTRD

ST CLAIR AVE W

MART

IN GR

OVE R

D

BishopAllen

721 ROYAL YORK RD

Our Ladyof Peace70 MATTICE AVE

Our Ladyof Sorrows32 MONTGOMERY RD

St. Pius X71 JANE ST

St. Gregory126 RATHBURN RD

St. James230 HUMBERCRESTBLVD

St.Demetrius

125 LA ROSE AVE

0 10.5 Km


±Our Lady of Sorrows Fixed Attendance Boundary


Secondary School




³X Closed School LocationAdmin Building³B

StreetsRailwayWater & RiversParksFixed AttendanceBoundaryOther Fixed Attendance Boundaries


³F

³S

³S

³E

³E

³E

³E³E

GARDINER EXPRESSWAY

St. Leo FixedAttendanceBoundary


St. Teresa FixedAttendanceBoundary

Toronto(Other)

FIRST

ST

LOUISA ST

ALAN A

VE

DISTIN

AVE

TWELF

TH ST

SECON

D ST

AUDL

E YST

LEGION RD

QUEEN

S AVE

WIND

SOR S

T

HARO

LD ST

EASTW

ICK RD

CAVELL AVE

DOUGLAS BLVD

PORTLAND ST

NORRIS CRES

THIRT

EENTH

ST

MIMICO AVE

PRIMROSE AVE

OXFORD ST

HAY AVE

SKELTONST

DRUMMOND ST

SEVEN

TH ST

NINTH

STTEN

TH ST

MILES RD

THIRD

ST

ELIZA

BETH

ST

FOUR

TH ST

FIFTH

ST

STATIO

N RD

ALDEN AVE

MERRIDAY STSIMPSON AVE

SUPERIOR AVE

MELROSE STALGOMA ST

SIXTH

ST

ST GE

ORGE

ST

ODON

NELL

AVE

WHEAT

FIELD

RD

GEOR

GE ST

CENTR

AL ST

ALBERT AVE

VICTOR AVE

MANCHESTER ST

MANITOBA ST

JUDSON ST

EASTBOURNE CRES

GOLDTHORNE AVE

EIGHT

H ST

LAKE CRES

HILLSIDE AVE

HEMAN ST

SYMONS ST

ALBANI ST

VANEVERY ST

MACDONALD ST

ELMA ST

MURRIE ST

STRUTHERS STNEW TORONTO ST

MARINE PARADE DR

HUMBER BAY PARK RD W

ISLING

TON A

VE

ROYAL

YORK

RDPARK LAWN RD

LAKE SHORE BLVD W

EVANS AVE

St. Teresa110 TENTH ST


0 10.5 Km


±St. Leo Fixed Attendance Boundary


Secondary School





StreetsRailwayWater & RiversParksFixed AttendanceBoundary

Admin Building³B Other Fixed Attendance Boundaries


³S

³E

³E

³E³E

GARDINER EXPRESSWAY

Holy AngelsFixed Attendance

Boundary

St. Leo FixedAttendanceBoundary


BoundarySt. Mark Fixed

AttendanceBoundary

St. Teresa FixedAttendanceBoundary

Toronto(Other)

CLIVE STOG

DEN P

LTENBY ST

PARK LANE

ETONA

CRT

BENT

LEY DR

VELM

A DR

GRAN

D AVE

RINGLEY AVE

KEYWELL CRT

LOUISA ST

LORNE AVE

GALA LANE

LOMA

RD

DELROY DR

STANLEY AVE

ALAN A

VE

BURM

A DR

DISTIN

AVE

DAYTO

N AVE

BETHNAL AVE

BRUSSELS ST

KINSDALE LANE

ALEXANDER ST

BELFRY AVE

STANMILLS RD

BRADBROOK RD

BADGER DR LARSTONEAVE

MENDOTA RDAU

DLEY

ST

GEOR

GE ST

LEGION RD

PENHU

RST A

VE

WESLE

Y ST

BUCK

INGHA

M ST

WIND

SOR S

T

ELFORD BLVDRO

THSAY

AVE

PARK

ER AV

E

C HAR

TWELL

RD

LADY B

ANK R

D

HARO

LD ST

EASTW

ICK RD

NORDIN AVE

MINSTREL DR

FAIRMAR AVE

CAVELL AVE

BERL

AVE

NEWH

OLM

RD

QUEEN

S AVE

AVON PARK DR

PORTLAND ST

BAYSIDELANE

MOYN

ES AV

E

DARLI

NGTO

N DR

MIMICO AVE

LILLIB

ET RD

PRIMROSE AVE

OXFORD ST

ABERLADYRD

CANNON RD

CROWN HILL PL

HAY AVE

INVER

LEIGH

DR

GUTH

RIE AV

E

MILTO

N ST

SKELTON ST

ALDGA

TE AV

E

WINS

LOW

ST

DRUMMOND ST

DUMB

ART O

NRD

KINSDALE BLVD

BERRY RD

U NO DR

BELL MANOR DR

HILL HEIGHTS RD

MAGNIFICENTR D

ELIZA

BETH

ST

BEAUCOURT RD

STATIO

N RD

FRANC

ES AV

E

ALDEN AVE

MERRIDAY ST

SIMPSON AVE

CONEY RD

SUPERIOR AVE

OAKFIELD DR

MELROSE ST

ASHM

ORE A

VE

ALGOMA ST

JUTLAND RD

EDWALTER AVE

TITAN RD

ST GE

ORGE

ST

ODON

NELL

AVE

AMBLESIDE AVE

CASTLEBAR RD

ALBERT AVE

VICTOR AVE

MANCHESTER ST

MANITOBA STS MITHCRES

JUDSON ST

YORKVIEW DR

EDGECROFT RD

PLASTI

CS AV

EDODDINGTON DR

TAYMA

LL AVE

BONNYVIEWDR

VANEVERY ST

MACDONALD ST

QUEENE L IZABETH BLVD

PARK LAWN RD

ISLI NGTON AVE

R OYA

LYOR

KRD

LAKE SHORE BLVD W

EVANS AVE

THE QUEENSWAY

Bishop Allen721 ROYALYORK RD


St. Louis11 MORGANAVE



0 0.650.325 Km


±St. Louis Fixed Attendance Boundary


Secondary School







³S

³S

³E

³E

³E³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

GARDINER EXPRESSWAY

Our Lady ofSorrows FixedAttendance Boundary


Boundary


St. Pius X FixedAttendanceBoundary

LOUISA ST

PLACID

RDLO

MA RD

ALAN A

VE

BURM

A DR

DISTIN

AVE

BELFRY AVE

DURB

AN RD

HIGH S

T

BADGER DR

BRULE GDNS

A UD L

EYST

LEGIONRD

WESLE

Y ST

WIND

SOR S

T

HARO

LD ST

WALLER AVE

MIN STREL DR

FAIRMAR AVE

CAVELL AVE

BERL

AVE

OSTEND AVE

MOSSO

M RD

PORTLAND ST

MOYN

ES AV

E

ELSFIE

LD RD

LORAHILLR DHAY AVE

MIMICO AVE

ATHLONE DR

PRIMROSE AVE

LILLIB

ET RD

WINSTON GRV

GLENROY AVE

OXFORD ST

BUDGELL T ER

EDGEMORE DR

INVER

LEIGH

DR

GUTH

RIE AV

E

MILTO

N ST

SMITH

FIELD

DR

SK ELTON

ST

ALDGA

TE AV

E

WINS

LOW

ST

LARKIN AVE

KINSDALE BLVD

BERRY RD

U NODR

WILLA

RD AV

E

WHEAT

FIELD

RD

OLDMILL DR

STEPH

EN DR

SAYBROOK AVE

GEOR

GE ST

CANNON RD

ELIZA

BETH

ST

BEAUCOURT RD

STATIO

N RD

DACRE CRES

FRANC

ES AV

E

KINGS POINT DR

C

O NEY RD

SUPERIOR AV E

OAKFIELD DR

MELROSE ST

CASTLEBAR RDAMBLESIDE AVE

YORKVIEW DREDGECROFT RD

ASHM

ORE A

VE

RIVERSIDE DR

ALGOMA ST

BERNICE AVE

THOM P SON AVE

DURIE

ST

EDWALTER AVE

KEN NEDYAVEST

GEOR

GE ST

ODON

NELL

AVE

RIVERVIEW GDNS

B RU LE CRES

GLENADEN AVE E

SUNNYLEA AVE E

ALBERT AVE

VICTOR AVE

PALISADES

WINDERMERE AVE

MANCHESTER ST

LARSTONEAVE

REID MANOR

MANITOBA ST

SMI T H CRES

SOUTHPORT ST

RIPLEY AVE

RUNN

YMED

E RD

LAVINI

A AVE

BERE

SFORD

AVE

PLASTI

CS AV

E

DODDINGTON DR

TAYMA

LL AVE

RI V ERSIDE CRES

BONNYVIEW DR

VANEVERY STMACDONALD ST

ELLIS A

VE

SWANSEAMEWS

COE HILL DR

HUMBER BAY PARK RDW

MARINE PARADE DR

ROYAL YORKRD

PARK LAWN RD

JANE S

T

SOUTH KINGSWAY

BLOOR ST W

EVANS AVE

LAKE SHORE BLVD WTHE QUEENSWAY

BishopAllen721 ROYAL YORK RD


St. Louis11 MORGAN AVE


St. Pius X71 JANE ST

0 10.5 Km


±St. Mark Fixed Attendance Boundary


Secondary School







TAB 15

MOUN

T PLEA

SANT

RD

BIRCH

MOUN

T RD

PARK

SIDE D

R

EVANS AVEQUEEN ST E

WOOD

BINE A

VE

AVEN

UE RD

JONES

AVE

CALED

ONIA

RD

EASTERN AVE

COSBURN AVE

COXW

ELL AV

E

LAIRD

DR

MCCO

WAN R

D

MAIN

ST

BATH

URST

ST

PORT

UNION

RD

THE W

EST M

ALL

DON M

ILLS R

D

SPADIN

A RD

HIGHWAY 27 N

THE WESTWAY

DREWRY AVE

KEELE

ST

BART

OR RD

HORNER AVE

MILITARY TRL

SENLA

C RD

EGLINTON AVE E GUILDWOOD PKWY

MIDL

AND A

VE

LAWRENCE AVE W

WILSON AVE

DANFORTH RD

LESLIE

ST

KENN

EDY R

D

BROW

NS LIN

EHIG

HWAY

27 S

OAKD

ALE R

D

VICTO

RIA PA

RK AV

E

SIGNE

T DR

NEILSON RD

MIDD

LEFIEL

D RD

FINCH AVE W

MORN

INGSID

E AVE

BELFIELD RD

ALNE

SS STALBION RD

SOUTH KINGSWAY

REXDALE BLVDMILNER AVE

SHEPPARD AVE W

ORIOL

E PKW

Y

HUNTINGWOOD DR

ARROW RD

CARL

AW AV

E

FENMAR DR

QEW

HWY

4 27

HWY 409

GARDINER

401W

DVP

St. Josaphat (temp)

ChristTheKingSt.Teresa

St. Ambrose

St.Leo

St.Louis

HolyAngels

St. ClementSt. Elizabeth

St.Mark

HolyFamily

Our Ladyof Peace

St.Mary

SenhorSantoCristo

St.VincentDe Paul

Our Ladyof Sorrows

St.Pius X

Nativityof OurLord

St.Luke

St.Helen

St.MichaelChoir JrSt.Paul

St. Francisof Assisi

JosyfCardinalSlipyj St.Gregory

St.Cecilia

JamesCulnan

Mother Cabrini

St.Luigi

St.Sebastian

St. Anthony

St.James

St.RitaSt. Raymond

OurLady ofLourdes St.Joseph

St. John theEvangelist(temp)St. Maryof theAngels St.Bruno

PopePaul VI

St.Denis

St. Marcellus

HolyName

St.ClareStellaMaris

St. Matthew

SantaMaria

St.John

St.Nicholasof Bari

OurLady ofVictory

St. Alphonsus

St. Demetrius

AllSaintsFatherSerra

HolyRosary

Our Lady ofPerpetual Help

St. JohnBosco

St.Brigid

Transfiguration St.Eugene

HolyCross

D'ArcyMcGee

St. Dunstan

St.ThomasAquinas

St.Maurice

ImmaculateConception

ImmaculateHeart of Mary

CanadianMartyrs

St. Bernard

St.Anselm

Sts Cosmasand Damian

ReginaMundi

St.FrancisXavier

St.Monica

Our Ladyof Fatima

St.Charles

St.JohnXXIII

St. Joachim

Our Lady of theAssumption

St.Fidelis

St.Simon

St.TheresaShrine

St. StephenSt. Benedict

St.Andre

St.Agatha

Holy Child

St. Raphael

BlessedSacrament

St. Conrad

St. Dorothy

St. MariaGoretti

St. Bonaventure

St.Norbert

St. JohnVianney

St.Jude

St.Martha

St. JaneFrances

PreciousBlood

BlessedMargherita

St.Andrew

St. Boniface

St. Catherine

St.Albert

St.Jerome

MonsignorJohn Corrigan

St.Robert

St. Nicholas

St. Lawrence

St.Roch

St.Angela

St.Kevin

St. Francisde Sales

St.Ursula

St.Edward

VenerableJohn Merlini

Annunciation

St.Wilfrid

St. Roseof Lima

St.CharlesGarnier

OurLady ofWisdom

St. IsaacJogues

CardinalCarter

St.Barbara

St. Augustine

St. Gabriel

St. MartinDe Porres

St. Richard

St.Victor

St. Malachy

St. Timothy

St.AntoineDaniel

St.Cyril

St.ThomasMore

St.GeraldHolySpirit

St. Matthias

St. Brendan

St.Kateri

BlessedTrinity Our Lady ofGuadalupe

St.EdmundCampion

St.ElizabethSeton

St.PaschalBaylon

St. Bartholomew

CardinalLeger

St.Agnes

St.Aidan

St. Barnabas

Epiphanyof Our Lord

St. Florence

St.DominicSavio

St. Ignatiusof Loyola

St.Jean DeBrebeuf

St. Sylvester

HolyRedeemer

St. Columba

St. MargueriteBourgeoysOur Ladyof Grace

St.Henry

SacredHeart

St. GabrielLalemant St.Bede

St. ReneGoupilTheDivineInfant

Princeof PeaceBlessed PierGiorgio Frassati

TheHolyTrinity

St.Veronica(closed) Dukeof York

St. Martin(closed)

St. Bernadette(closed)

500CummerAve St.Leonard(closed)

St. JohnFisher(closed)

Our Lady ofMount Carmel(closed)

RailsideWarehouse

CatholicEducationCentre

Msgr Fraser College- Annex & Orientation

Msgr FraserCollege -Isabella Campus

Msgr Fraser College- NorfinchCampus

Msgr FraserCollege - MidlandCampus

St. Josaphat(temp holding)

St. Michael(temp located@ Sacre Coeur)

Sacre Coeur(Holding forSt. Michael)

St. John theEvangelist (templocated @ BER)

St. Margaret(Gr 5-8 templocated @ SSF)Dante AlighieriBeatrice Campus(SSF) & StMargaret Gr5-8 (temp)

CE01

CE02

CE03

CE04

CE05

CE06

CE07

CE08

CE09

CE10CE11

CE12

CE13

CE14CE15

CE16

CE17

CE18 ±

Toronto Catholic District School Board - School Accommodation Review Clusters

0 7.5 15 KmTCDSB Planning ServicesFebruary 2015

SARC Cluster1 - Senhor Santo Cristo, St. Luke2 - St. Bruno, St. Raymond3 - Holy Angels, Our Lady of Sorrows,St. Leo, St. Louis, St. Mark4 - Blessed Pier Giorgio Frassati, SacredHeart, St. Bede, St. Gabriel Lalemant

5 - Prince of Peace, St. Rene Goupil,The Divine Infant6 - Holy Redeemer, Our Lady ofGuadalupe, St. Matthias, St. Timothy7 - St. Luigi, St. Rita, St. Sebastian8 - Immaculate Heart of Mary, St.Theresa Shrine9 - Blessed Trinity, St. Agnes, St. Gabriel

# Future School Location!\̂_ Temporary Locations/Under Construction!C Closed Elementary School" Admin Building!\ Elementary School% Adult Education

Elementary Review AreasStreetsIndustrial Land/Park Land

³F³S

³S

³S³S

³S

³S

³S

³S

³E³E

³E

³E³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E³E

³E

³E³E ³E

³E

³E

³E

³E³E

³E

³E

³E³E

³E³E

³E

³E

³E

³E³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³T

³T

³T

³E

³E

³E ³E

³E

City ofMississauga

GARDINER EXPRESSWAY

QUEEN ELIZABETH WAY

HIGHW

AY 42

7

CE01

CE02

CE04

CE05

FIFTH

ST

BETAS

T

JEFFDR

DELTA

ST

SIXTH

ST

NINTH

ST

MILL RD

EAST DR

ELDER AVE EIGHT

H ST

KNOLLDR

FIMAC

RES

LAKE CRESHEMAN ST

SYMONS ST

ALBANI ST

ELMA ST

MURRIE ST

ABILENEDR

DURIE

ST

ELLIS A

VE

VANS

CO RD

AK RON RD

LAURE

L AVE

SIX POINT RD

ALLIANCE AVE

HE RNE HIL L

ATOMI

C AVE

TERRY DR

NORTH DR

ADVANCE RD

TORLA

KE CRES

COE HILLDR

NORSEMAN ST

TITAN RD

VALECRES TDR

VICKE R

SRD

M ARINE PARADE DR

BLOOR ST W

BROW

NSLIN

E

ROYA

L YOR

K RD

ST CLAIR AVE W

KIPLIN

G AVE

EVANS AVE

BURNHAMTHORPE RD

PARK LAWN RDTHEWEST MALL

THE EASTMALL

WESTON RD

RENF

ORTH

DR

JANE S

T

DUNDAS ST W

SOUTHKINGSWAY

IS LI NGTON AVE

MART

INGR

OVER

D SCARLET T RD

LAKE SHORE BLVD W

EGLINTON AVE W

THE QUEENSWAY

RATHBURN RD

TheHolyTrinitySt. Josaphat (tempholding) FatherJohnRedmond

Bishop Allen

Michael Power-St.Joseph

ChristTheKing

St. Teresa

St. Ambrose

St. Clement

St. Elizabeth

Our Ladyof Peace

St.Pius X

Nativityof OurLord

JosyfCardinalSlipyj

St. Gregory

St.CeciliaJamesCulnan

Mother Cabrini

St.James

Our Ladyof Victory

St. Leo

St.Louis

HolyAngels

St.Mark

Our Ladyof Sorrows

0 21 Km


±

CE02

CE03

CE04

CE05

CE06

CE07

CE08

CE10CE11CE12

CE13

CE14CE15

CE16CE17

CE18

CE01

Elementary EDC Review Area CE01

OLOS, Holy Angels, St. Louis, St. Mark &St. Leo SARC Cluster


Secondary School³F Future School Location




StreetsRailway

Water & RiversParksEDC Review Area

Admin Building³BOther EDC ReviewAreas

TAB 16

Phasing and

Yield2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029

Unit Phasing 33 35

Student Yield 0.8 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7

Unit Phasing 44 44 44 44

Student Yield 2.3 4.7 7 9.3 9.3 9.3 9.3 9.3 9.3 9.3 9.3 9.3 9.3 9.3 9.3

Units 77 79 44 44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Student Yield 3.1 6.4 8.7 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11

Phasing and

Yield2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029

Unit Phasing 28 30

Student Yield 0.8 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7

Unit Phasing 100 101 100 101 102 103

Student Yield 2.5 4.9 7.4 9.9 12.4 14.9 14.9 14.9 14.9 14.9 14.9 14.9 14.9 14.9 14.9

Unit Phasing 25 25 25 25 25 25

Student Yield

Unit Phasing 81 82

Student Yield 2 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

Unit Phasing 99 101 66 66 68 49 49 49 57 0 0

Student Yield 2.4 4.8 6.4 8 9.6 10.8 12 13.1 14.6 14.6 14.6

Unit Phasing 14 14 16

Student Yield 0.5 1 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6

Unit Phasing 107 107 111 81 81 81 82 162 163

Student Yield 2.5 4.9 7.5 9.4 11.2 13.1 15 18.7 22.5

Unit Phasing 49 49 53 37 37 37 40 75 76

Student Yield 1.1 2.2 3.5 4.3 5.1 6 6.9 8.6 10.4


Student Yield 1.7 3.5 5.2 7.1 7.1 7.1

Unit Phasing 75 75 75 77 151 151

Student Yield 1.8 3.6 5.4 7.2 10.8 14.4

Units 153 156 125 126 307 311 236 236 248 321 321 321 340 388 390

Student Yield 3.3 6.6 9.1 11.6 18.5 25.4 31.1 36.7 42.8 50.2 57.6 65 73 82 91.2

Phasing and

Yield2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029

Unit Phasing 16 18

Student Yield 0.3 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7

Unit Phasing 3 3 3 3 4 4

Student Yield 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.8 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1

Unit Phasing 197 198 197 198 197 198 131 131 133 98 98 98 101

Student Yield 5.2 10.4 15.6 20.8 26 31.3 34.7 38.2 41.7 44.3 46.8 49.4 52.1 52.1 52.1

Unit Phasing 14 15 2 2 3 2 2 2 2

Student Yield 0.5 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.8

Unit Phasing 2 2 2 1 1 1 3

Student Yield

Unit Phasing 17 17 20 7 7 7 7 14 15

Student Yield 0.6 1.2 1.9 2.3 2.7 3 3.4 4.2 4.9

Units 216 219 200 201 215 217 152 152 158 108 108 108 113 14 15

Student Yield 5.7 11.4 16.8 22.1 28 34.1 38.2 42.4 46.7 49.9 52.9 55.9 59.1 59.9 60.6

15.3

11 173938 WET 06 OZ2521‐2513 Lake Shore

Boulevard West1975 520.7

Total 2142 560.2

13 141966 WET 06 OZ 250 Royal York Road 111 24.2

06 178087 WET 06 OZ2298 Lake Shore

Boulevard West12 0

05 211238 WET 06 SA 2 & 6 Royal York Road

Plan Number Address Total Units

Total

Student

Yield

Year

10 120892 WET 06 SA2686 Lake Shore


11 165034 WET 06 SA 11 Superior Avenue 34 10.1

44

Total 244 150.2

St. Leo

68 24.6

10 300716 WET 05 SB 1030 & 1040 Islington

Avenue176 125.6

13 233677 WET 05 OZ 30 Fieldway Road 150 0

11 330550 WET 05 OZ 30 Fieldway Road 163 42

110.9

12 245092 WET 05 OZ 64 Cordova Avenue 975 104.8

13 164210 WET 04 OZ

58 24.6

Total 3979 604.1

14 183631 WET 04 OZ4208 Dundas Street

West604 43.2

13 185427 WET 05 OZ 2800 Bloor Street West 44 12.7

289 The Kingsway 453 48.1


West321 31.7

12 113361 WET 05 SA 1286 Islington Avenue 607 186.1

12 111249 WET 04 OZ 270 The Kingsway 604

Development SummaryHoly Angels


Total

Student

Yield

Year

07 289614 WET 05 SA 1061 The Queensway

Our Lady of Sorrows


Total

Student

Yield

Year


West

Phasing and

Yield2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029


Student Yield 1.2 2.3 3.5 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7

Unit Phasing 68 68 68 70 137 137

Student Yield 1.5 3 4.6 6.1 9.1 12.3

Units 47 48 47 48 0 0 0 0 0 68 68 68 70 137 137

Student Yield 1.2 2.3 3.5 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 6.2 7.7 9.3 10.8 13.8 17

Phasing and

Yield2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029

Unit Phasing 31 32

Student Yield 0.8 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6

Unit Phasing 116 116

Student Yield 2.8 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.7

Unit Phasing 103 104

Student Yield 2.6 5.3 8 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7


Student Yield 1.3 2.6 4 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3

Unit Phasing 195 197 196 197

Student Yield 4.5 9 13.5 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18

Unit Phasing 85 86 85 86 56 56 61

Student Yield 2.1 4.3 6.5 8.7 10.1 11.5 13.1 13.1 13.1 13.1 13.1 13.1 13.1

Unit Phasing 196 196 196 196 131 131 132

Student Yield 4.7 9.4 14.2 18.9 22 25.2 28.4 28.4 28.4 28.4 28.4 28.4 28.4

Unit Phasing 86 86 57 57 59

Student Yield 2.2 4.3 5.8 7.2 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7

Unit Phasing 57 57 57 60 115 116

Student Yield 1.5 3 4.4 6 9 12.1

Unit Phasing 54 54 54 57 109 110

Student Yield 1.2 2.3 3.5 4.8 7.1 9.5

Unit Phasing 121 121 121 122 2 3

Student Yield 2.8 5.6 8.3 11.2 11.3 11.4

Units 302 304 528 532 563 565 244 244 252 232 232 232 239 226 229

Student Yield 7.5 15.2 30.6 46 59.7 73.2 79.2 85.2 91.5 97 102.4 107.7 113.5 118.9 124.5Total 4924 1152.1

11 205554 WET 06 OZ

36 Park Lawn Road

345 80.4

12 123575 WET 06 OZ 10 Park Lawn Road 515 134.9

09 115113 WET 06 SA

2169‐2173 Lake Shore

Boulevard West

207 144.3

14 193159 WET 05 OZ 144 Berry Road 490 50.6

2183 Lake Shore

Boulevard West

12 142282 WET 06 SA2151‐2153 Lake Shore


12 142305 WET 06 SA

42 Park Lawn Road

462 36

10 104813 WET 06 OZ 209 71.5

13 247990 WET 06 OZ2161 Lake Shore


2175 Lake Shore

Boulevard West

785 207

09 198694 WET 06 SA

2157 & 2161 Lake Shore

Boulevard West

63 23.2


Total

Student

Yield

11 276514 WET 06 SA

2143‐2147 Lake Shore

Boulevard West

232 82.6

12 142323 WET 06 SA

Year

Total 738 100

St. Mark

08 232369 WET 06 SA 315 & 327 Royal York

Road190 63.4

13 253075 WET 06 OZ 251 Manitoba Street 548 36.6

St. Louis


Total

Student

Yield

Year

TAB 17

³S

³S

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

æ

æ

æ

æ æ

æ

æ

æ

æ

æ

æ

æ

æ

æ

æ

æ

æ

æ

æ

æ

æ

CRAIK RD

DUER

N ST

ELVIN AVE

LYDON AVE

HAND

EL ST

ALTHEA RD

EAGL

E RD

BELFRY AVE

COSM

O RD

BADGER DR

SHAND AVE

LELAND AVE

MONTYE AVE

BELVA

LE AV

E

HIGHG

ATE R

D

NEWE

LL CRT

LOYALISTRD

WILGAR RD

DURBANRD

MOSSO

M RD

CORBETT AVE

REIGATE RD

WHITE AVE

ELSFIE

LD RD

BERMUDA AVE

CARY

S FORT

RD

LORAHILL RD

WARREN CRES

ATHLONE DR

LILLIB

ET RD

WINSTON GRV

LOTH

IAN AV

E

GLENROY AVE

RIVERSIDEDR

ALLIANCE AVE

WATSO

N AVE

EDGEMORE DR

MARIP

OSA A

VE

STRATH AVE

KINGS

MILL

RD

ADELPH

A DR

ROMNEY RD

WESTR

OSEAVE

LARKIN AVE

BENEDICTRD

CHRY

ESSA A

VE

BIRCH

CROF

TRD FOXWELL ST

CYNTHIA RD

B ERNICE CRES

ROBALD ON RD

GOLFCREST RD

AVONHURST RD

MATTICE RD

KINGS

LY NN R

D

ORRELL AVE

EIL E EN AVE

OLDMILL DR

SAYBROOK AVE

CEDARCRESTDR

RATHBURN RD

PENDEEN AVE

PHEASANT LANE

WEND

OVE R

RD

TWYFORD RD

BRENDWIN RD

VELMADR

LAMBETH RD

DELEMERE AVE

ELLIOTT AVE

KINGS PO INT DR

CONEY RD

BERING AVE

HARTFIELD RD

OLDHAM RD

EDGE

VALLE

YDR

WESTRIDGE RD

CENTRE DR

CLAIRTON CRES

RIVER

CREST

RDHA

L FORD

AVE

HUMB

ER TR

L

PRINC

ETON R

D

ELLINS AVE

BERNICE AVE

THO M PSON AVE

GREN

VIEW

BLVD N

FRENC

H AVE

E DENVA L E CRES

EDWALTER AVE

FONTENAY

CRT

BLAIR ATHOL CRES

BABY POIN T CRES

KINGSGARDEN RD

GRAYWOOD DR

THO RNBURYCRES

BABY POINT RD

F INCHLEY RD

PERRY CRES

ANGLESEY BLVD

KINGSWAY CRES

HARSHAW AVE

SANDCLIFF RD

WOOLNER AVE

GLENADEN AVE E

RIVERBANK DR

BR UL E CRES

ROCKINGHAM DR

EDGEH

ILLRD

SUNNYLEA AVE E

QUEEN ANNE RD

RIV ERVIEW GDNS

COUNTRY CL UB DR

FRIARSLANE

METHUEN AVE

OLD MILL TER

BE ARWOOD DR

REID MANOR

EAST DR

PRISC

ILLA A

VE

GREAT OAK DR

WILLA

RD AV

E

EVANS

AVE

AYLESBURY RD

CARDIGAN RD

ARMA

DALE

AVE

PALAC

EARC

HDR

OLD MILL RD

LARSTONE AVE

CANTERB URY C

RES

PRINC ES S ANNE

CRES

SIR

WILLI AMS LANE

RIVERSIDE CRES

ASHLEYPARKRD

POPLAR HEIGHT SDR

KNOLL DR

BYWOOD DR

ABILENE DR

ROBIN HOOD RD

ALLANBRO

OKEDR

NOTTINGHAM DR

CHAUNCEY AVE

WIMBLETON RD

BROO

KSIDE

AVE

RAVENSBOURNE CR E S

PINEHUR S T CRES

SIX POINT RD

HUMB

ERCR

EST BL

VD

HERNE HILL

THE KINGSWAY

V ANCHO CRES

EDENBRIDGE DR

ED

INBOROUGH CRT

NORTH DR

ADVANCE RD

COURTSFIELDCRES

MABELLE AVE

EDEN VALLEY D R

NORSEMAN ST

HOME SMITH PARK RD

VALECREST DR

BLOOR ST W

SCARLETT RD

ST CLAIR AVE W

DUNDAS ST W

ROYA

L YOR

K RD

JANE S

T

ISLING

TON A

VE

EGLINTON AVE W

BishopAllen

Our Lady ofSorrows Parish3055 Bloor Street West

Resurrection of Our LordJesus Christ Parish1 Resurrection Road

St. James Parish728 Annette Street

Our Ladyof Sorrows

St.Pius X

JamesCulnan

St.James

OUR LADY OF SORROWS PARISH BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION¯

0 10.5 Km


æ Catholic Parish³E Elementary Schools³S Secondary School

RailwayStreetsParksWater & RiversParish BoundaryOther Parish Boundaries

Our Lady of Sorrows Parish Boundary North: South of Poplar Heights Drive (at Islington), east along Silver Creek to Humber RiverEast: Humber RiverSouth: Glenaden Avenue East, Prince Edward Drive South, Ried Manor, Royal York Drive, Norseman StreetWest: Islington Avenue

³S

³S

³S

³E³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E³E

³E

³E

æ

æ

æ

æ

æ ææ

æ

æ

æ

æ

æ

æ

æ

æ

æ

æ

æ

ææ

æ

æ

æ

æ

æ

æ

æEVA RD

IRIS RD

YARN RD

GORT

AVE

FOCH

AVE

HAY AVE

JAMES ST

U

N ODR

NORA RD

TOWNS RD

THIRD

ST

STATIO

N RD

EDILO

U DR

ALDEN AVE

CO

NEY RD

RAYSI

DE DR

FIFTH

ST

BERING AVE

WHALEY DR

TENTH

ST

MELROSE ST

DELTA

ST

ALGOMA ST

GAMM

A ST

CARSO

N ST

B ETA

ST

JEFF DR

ALGIE A

VE

SEVEN

TH ST

S ATURNRD

SIXTH

ST

COWLEY AVE

EXMOOR DR

CORONET RD

F INCHLEY RD

PERRY CRES

DOWNING ST

STATLER AVE

NINTH

ST

LAVER RD

GEOR

GE ST

TWELF

TH ST

RATHGAR AVE

CENTR

AL ST

THICKET RD

MANSTORRD

SILVE

RHILL

DR POPLARAVE

PAXMAN RD

OVIDA AV E

RE ID MANOR

MILL RD

SMIT H CRES

NEILS

ON DR

JUDSON ST

GREAT OAK DR

SHAV

ERAV

E N

EDGECROFT RD

BEARBURY D R

SHERWAY DR

LARSTONEAVE

PLASTI

CS AV

E

ELDER AVE

TAYMA

LL AVE

WARESIDERD

W IMBLETON RD

VICKSON CRT

BELVIARD

ELMCREST RD

A PPLE

BYRD

SIXTEE

NTH S

TSEV

ENTEE

NTH S

T

EIGHT

H ST

I SLANDRD

S

U BWAY C RES

BYWOOD DR

BURN

EL MDR

FIMA CR

ES

LAKE CRES

HILLSIDE AVE

HEMAN ST

SYMONS ST

ALBANI ST

VANEVERY STMACDONALD ST

ELMA ST

MURRIE ST

STRUTHERS ST

ROBIN HOODRD

S M I T HWOO

DDR

ALLANBRO

OKEDR

N OTTINGHAMDR

CHAUNCEY AVE

PINEHURST C RES

VANS

CO RD

LORRAINEGDNS

AKRON RD

FORDHOUSE BLVD

NORBERT CRES

LAURELAVE

BU RROW

SAVE

BURNHAMILL PL

SIX POINT RD

NEW TORONTO ST

HERNEHILL

ATOMI

C AVE

MARKLA ND DR

ADVANCE RD

M ABELLE AVE

TO

RLAKE CRES

NORSEMAN ST

TITAN RD

JUTLAND RD

VICKERS RD

EVANS AVE

ROYA

LYOR

K RDDUNDAS ST W

SHOR

NCLIF

FE RD

NORTH QUEEN ST

LAKE SHORE BLVD W

BLOOR ST W

THE EAST MALL

THE QUEENSWAY

HORNER AVE

ISLI NGTONAVE

KIPLIN

G AVE

THE W

EST M

ALL

HIGHW

AY 42

7 X N

F G GARDINER C E

427X

S427

CS

HIGHW

AY 42

7 C N

QEW X E

427X

N 427

C N

QEW X W

HIGHW

AY 42

7 X S

F G GARDINER XY E

Father JohnRedmond

BishopAllen

City ofMississauga

ChriBlvd.

Holy AngelsParish

61 Jutland Road

Nativity of OurLord Parish

480 Rathburn Road

Our Lady of theMiraculous Medal Parish739 Browns Line

Our Lady ofPeace Parish3914 Bloor St. West Our Lady of

Sorrows Parish3055 Bloor Street West

Resurrection of OurLord Jesus Christ Parish

1 Resurrection Road

St. Ambrose Parish782 Browns Line

St. Clement'sParish409 Markland Drive

St. Gregory'sParish122 Rathburn Road

St. Leo's Parish277 RoyalYork Road

St. Teresa's Parish100 TenthStreet

Holy Family CopticCatholic Parish

62 Luness Road

Sacred Heart ofJesus Parish - Ye

Su Sung Shim Parish296 Judson Street

St.Teresa

St. Ambrose

St.Leo

St.Louis

Holy Angels

St.Clement St.

Elizabeth

Our Ladyof Peace

OurLady ofSorrows

HOLY ANGELS PARISH BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION¯

0 1.50.75 Km




Holy Angels Parish Boundary North: Canadian Pacific Railway, Kipling Avenue, Norseman StreetEast: Royal York DriveSouth: Nordin Avenue, The Queensway, QEWWest: Etobicoke Creek

³S

³S

³E³E

³E

³E

³E ³E

³E

³E

³E

æ

æ

æ

æ ææ

æ

æ

æ

æ

æ

æ

æ

æ

æ

ææ

FIRST

S T

H IGHS

T

SECON

D ST

A UDL

EYST

LEGION RD

WESLE

Y ST

ARNO

LD ST

HARO

LD ST

CAVELL AVE

BERL

AVE

ZORR

A ST

STOCK

AVE

MOYN

ES AV

E

NORRIS CRES

MIMICO AVE

LILLIB

ET RD

OXFORD ST

HAY AVE

GUTH

RIE AV

E

MILTO

N ST

SKELTONST

ALDGA

TE AV

E

WINS

LOW

ST

C ON NELL CRT

GOOD

R ICHR

D BERRY RD

U NODR

CULN

AN AV

E

NOR D

INAVE

STEPH

EN DR

MILES RD

TOWNS RD

THIRD

ST

CANNON RD

TRUE

MANA

VE

BEAUC

OURT

RD

FOUR

TH ST

FIFTEE

NTH S

T

STATIO

N RD

FRANC

ES AV

E

ALDEN AVE

MERRIDAY ST

CONEY RD

SIMPSON AVE

TUPP

ER AV

E

SUPERIOR AVE

FIFTH

ST

OAKFIELD DR

TENTH

ST

MELROSE ST

LAK E SHORE DR

ASHM

ORE A

VE

RIVERSIDE DR

ALGOMA ST

SEVEN

TH ST

EDWALTER AVE

SIXTH

ST

ST GE

ORGE

ST

ODON

NELL

AVE

TWEN

TIETH

STNIN

ETEEN

TH ST

FOUR

TEENT

H ST

NINTH

ST

TWEN

TY FIR

ST ST

AMBLESIDE AVECASTLEBAR RD

WHEAT

FIELD

RD

THIRT

EENTH

ST

GEOR

GE ST

TWELF

TH ST

CENTR

AL ST

ALBERT AVE

VICTOR AVE

MANCHESTER ST

DORC

HES TE

R AV E

MANITOBA ST

RIVERSIDE CRES

S M I THCRESJUDSON ST

EASTBOURNE CRES

YORKVIEW DR

EDGECROFT RD

GOLDTHORNE AVE

PLASTI

CS AV

E

DODDINGTON DR

TAYMA

LL AVE

SIXTEE

NTH S

TSEV

ENTEE

NTH S

T

EIGHT

H ST

BONNYVIEWDR

LAKE CRES

HILLSIDE AVE

HEMAN ST

SYMONS ST

ALBANI ST

VANEVERY ST

MACDONALD ST

ELMA ST

MURRIE ST

STRUTHERS ST

QUEENELIZA B ETH BLVD

NEW TORONTO ST

TORLAKE CRES

TITAN RD

JUTLAND RD

MARINE PARADE DR

HUMBERBAY PARK RD W

EVANS AVE

NORTH QUEEN STPARK LAWN RD LAKE SHORE BLVD W

KIPLIN

G AVE

THE QUEENSWAY

HORNER AVE

ISL IN GTON AVE

F G GARDINER C E

F G GARDINER C WF G GARDINER XY W F G GARDINER XY E

FatherJohnRedmond

BishopAllen

Holy AngelsParish

61 Jutland Road


St.Teresa's Parish100 Tenth Street

Sacred Heart ofJesus Parish - Ye SuSung Shim Parish

296 Judson Street

St.Teresa

St.Leo

St.Louis

HolyAngels

St. Mark

ST. LEO PARISH BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION¯

0 10.5 Km


St. Leo Parish Boundary North: The QueenswayEast: Mimico CreekSouth: Dwight Avenue, Canadian National RailwayWest: Kipling Avenue



³S

³S

³E

³E

³E³E

³E

³E

æ

æ

æ

ææ

æ

æ

æ

æ

æ

æ

æ

æ

St. Leo

St.Louis

St. MarkELLIS GDNS

LOUISA ST

LORNE AVE

DELROY DR

STANLEY AVE

UNO DR

BURM

A DR

DISTIN

AVE

DAYTO

N AVE

SIMPSON AVE

F IESTA LANE

BETHNAL AVE

EASSON AVE

LELAND AVE

BRUSSELS ST

ALEXANDER ST

HIGH S T

ST OLAVES RD

HAY AVE

BRULE GD NS

ORCHARD CRES

ELSFIE

LD RD

DACRE CRES

MENDOTA RD

AUD L

EYST

LEGION RD

PENHU

RST A

VE

WESLE

Y ST

VERBENA AVE

WIND

SOR S

T

INNISFREE CRT

DURIE

ST

HARO

LD ST

WOODWAY TRL

GLENELLEN DR E

WALLER AVE

MIN STR EL DR

SUMMERHILL RD

KENRIDGE AVE

FAIRMAR AVE

STEPHEN MEWS

CAVELL AVE

BERL

AVE

SYMONS ST

ARMADA LEAV

E

RAMB

ERT CRES

MAYFIELD AVE

OSTEND AVE

ELMA ST

NEWH

OLM

RD

QUE EN

SAVE

MOSSO

M RD

HILLSIDE AVE

STRUTHERS ST

WATERFRONT DR

DOUGLAS BLVD

MACDONALD ST

VANEVERY ST

PORTLAND ST

BAYSIDELANE

MOYN

ES AV

E

DARLI

NGTO

N DR

NORRIS CRES

GLENELLEN DR WLORAHILL RD

MIMICO AVE

ATHLONE DR

PRIMROSE AVE

WINSTON GRV

GLENROY AVE

OXFORD ST

SUNNYLEA AVE W

SUNNYDALE DR

CROWN HILL PL

GLENADEN AVE W

EDGEMORE DR

INVER

LEIGH

DR

BUDGELL T ER

GUTH

RIE AV

E

MILTO

N ST

SMITH

FIELD

DR

SKELTON ST

ALDGA

TE AV

E

WINS

LOW

ST

DUMB

ARTO

N RD

LARKIN AVE

KINSDALE BLVD

BERRY RD

BELL MANOR DR

HILL HEIGHTS RD

STEPH

EN DR

CANNON RD

BEAUC

OURT

RD

STATIO

N RD

FRANC

ES AV

E

KINGS POINT DR

SUPERIOR AVE

OAKFIELD DR

MELROSE ST

RIVERSIDE DR

ALGOMA ST

BERNICE AVE

THOMPSONAVE

KIRK BRADDEN RD E

EDWALTER AVE

KENNEDYAVEGLENADEN AVE E

BRULE CRES

SUNNYLEA AVE E

WHEAT

FIELD

RD

GEOR

GE ST

CENTR

AL ST

ALBERT AVE

VICTOR AVE

WINDERMERE AVE

PALISADES

MANCHESTER ST

MANITOBA ST

REID MANOR

SOUTHPORT ST

RIPLEY AVE

RUNN

YMED

E RD

LAVINI

A AVE

BERE

SFORD

AVE

DODDINGTON DR

RIVERSIDE CRES

B ONNYVIEWDR

ELLIS A

VE

SWANSEA MEWS

COE HILL DR

MARINE PARADE DR

HUMBER BAY PARK RD W

SOUTH KINGSWAY

ROYA

L YOR

K RD

PARK LAWN RD

LAKE SHORE BLVD W

THE QUEENSWAY

F G GARDINER C EF G GARDINER XY WF G GARDINER XY E

BishopAllen


St. Mark'sParish

277 Park Lawn Road

St. Pius X Parish2305

Bloor St. West

ST. MARK PARISH BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION¯

0 0.750.375 Km


St. Mark Parish Boundary North: Ried Manor, Price Edward Drive South,Glenaden Avenue EastEast: Humber RiverSouth: The Queensway, Mimico CreekWest: Royal York Drive



TAB 18

Policy

Transportation may be provided to pupils in Special Education Programs or where a substantial number of Catholic pupils have difficulty in availing themselves of a Catholic education.

Regulations:

1. Home to school transportation shall:

a) be provided for elementary level pupils who are deemed exceptional by an I.P.R.C. andrequire programs not offered in their home school;

b) be provided for elementary level pupils who are certified by a medical practitioner to betemporarily or permanently unable to walk to school due to ongoing medical issues and supported through Board approved documentation signed by a physician;

c) be provided for qualified pupils living within the transportation area of an Eastern RiteCatholic elementary school where the walking distance to the school is more than 1.5 km;

d) be provided where no less than 30 existing or new elementary school pupils live more than 1.5 km from the nearest Catholic school or the proposed site thereof; or where safety hazards, as defined, exist;

e) be considered by the school principal for elementary level pupils as a temporary service where individual hardship exists and home to school transportation is the most appropriate response in accordance with the guidelines for extenuating circumstances as established by the Board from time to time; and

f) where funds are available, service is provided for all (resident) pupils attending the giftedprogram who reside more than 1.5 km from the centre school which they attend.

g) be provided for students in select geographical areas whose home school is over subscribedand redirection to another local facility with sufficient capacity best addresses the needs of the community and the School Board;

h) where funds are available, service is provided for all French Immersion students (SK to grade8) who reside more than 1.5 km from the centre school they attend.

Toronto Student Transportation Group

2. TTC tickets shall:

a) be provided for elementary pupils attending St. Michael Choir School who live more than 1.5 km from the school;

b) be provided for individual pupils attending Eastern Rite Catholic Schools who do not live within a school transportation area;

c) where funds are available, be provided for elementary and secondary school pupils as a temporary service where individual hardship exists and TTC tickets are the most appropriate response;

d) be provided for elementary school pupils attending partial immersion programs (middle immersion grades 5 to 8) where the walking distance to the program is 1.5 km or more and TTC service is available and utilized;

e) where funds are available, be provided for resident and non-resident pupils attending the Gifted Program who reside 1.5 km or more from the centre school and TTC service is available and utilized;

f) be provided one way for resident and non-resident secondary school pupils enrolled in cooperative education programs provided that TTC service is available and utilized

3. Regular home to school transportation for kindergarten programs shall:

a) be provided for all pupils who reside more than 1.5 km from the school to which transportation is normally provided; and

b) be considered by the school principal for any pupil residing less than 1.5 km from school where adequate parental supervision cannot be provided while en route to or from school or personal hardship, family circumstances or unusual hazards warrant.

4. Where funds are available, School to School transportation shall be provided for all Grade 5 and 6 pupils enrolled in the gifted program.

5. Anyone wishing to appeal a decision or recommendation made by staff can appear in person at the Board’s Administrative and Corporate Services Committee to present their case to the Board of Trustees.

TCDSB Transportation Policy

Distance Criteria Eligible Distance Type of Service

Kindergarten Yes 1.5km School Bus

Grade 1 Yes 1.5km School Bus








Grade 9 No N/A

Grade 10 No N/A

Grade 11 No N/A

Grade 12 No N/A

Hazard Criteria Established Yes School Bus

Program Services

Early French Immersion No N/A

Middle Immersion / Extended French Yes >1.5km TTC

Gifted No N/A

Student with Special Needs Yes IEP Dependent IEP Dependent

nm

nm

nm

nm

nm

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1I1

I1

I1

I1I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1I1I1

I1 I1I1I1

I1

ST LEO CATHOLIC SCHOOL

ST LOUIS CATHOLIC SCHOOL

HOLY ANGELS CATHOLIC SCHOOL

OUR LADY OF PEACE CATHOLIC SCHOOL

NORSEMAN

JUDSON

JUTLAND

SHAVER

PRINCE EDWARD

BERRY

AUKLAND

BEAMISH

DUNBLOOR

ISLINGTON

KIPLING

EVANSTHE QUEENSWAY

DUND

AS

BLOOR

ROYAL YORK

BLOOR

EVANS

NORTH QUEEN

SHORNCLIFFE

THE EAST MALL

HORNERST LAW

RENCE

JAMES STOCK

HAY

BERING

TYRE

TITAN

JOPLING MERVYN

VAN DUSEN

ADVANCE

LELAND

SIX POINT

UNO

CHARTWELL

OXFORD

CONEY

LOTHIAN

DELROY

ATHOL

YORKVIEW

SIMPSON

GLENADEN

AMBLESIDE

WILMAR

PAULART

FIELD

WAY

MATTICE

WARNICA

EDGECROFT

GLENELLENHUMBERVALE

PRENNAN

STOCK

ATOMIC

BERL

LOMA

ASHBOURNE

BADGEROVIDA

JUDGE

POPLAR

BOTFIELD

OURLAND

SUNNYLEA

VANSCO

THOMPSON

SAYBROOK

CASTLEBARMONKTON

CHAUNCEY

CULNAN

EAGLE

FERNALROY

ACORN

WICKMAN

SHAVER

STATLER

DANIELS

MEADOWVALE

MEDULLABA

LLAC

AINE

GLENROY

FORDHOUSE

CLAYMORE

CHARLESTON

ALGOMA

MENDOTA

TRUEMAN

ALGIE

PARKER

HARJOLYN

ZORRA

WESLEY

QUEEN ELIZABETH

EDGEMORE

MUNSTER

BRAWLEY

BETHNAL

MABELLE

MOYNES

MANITOBA

SMITH

WINSTON

VELMA

MORGANTAYMALL

ELFORD

SWAN

CARDIGANBERNICE

SHAWBRIDGE

DOWNING

ROTHSAY

NEWCASTLE

OAKFIELD

REID MANOR

KIRK BRADDEN

ALDEN

MELROSE

DURBANCLISSOLDFAIRLIN IVY LEA

PLASTICS

SUBWAY

MILTON

HAROLD

SEVENOAKS

CLIVEDEN

BENTLEY

LADY BANK

ABERFOYLE

BERRY

KENWAY

STANMILLS

BONNYVIEW

MARTIN GROVE

ELSFIELD

RENOWN

PORTLAND

LARSTONE

ORCHARD

OLIVEWOOD

GRAYSTONE

ALAN

CANMOTOR

TENBY

HOLBROOKE

SUNNYDALE

CORONET

MCINTOSH

CARNARVON

DIESEL

GARDENVALE

NORDIN

ASHMORE

WINSLOW

SILVERHILL

LEAMINGTON

GREENFIELD

DAYTONODONNELL

SPRING GARDEN

LILLIBET

PENHURST

GREEN LANES

EDWALTER

ST ALB

ANS

GAYLORD

GRENVIEW

SOUTH KINGSLEA

GOLDTHORNE MERRIDAY

PLYWOOD

DISTIN

KEBRAL

KENRIDGE

ATHLONE

BRADFIELD

COSMO

ARNOLD

DORCHESTER

BELFRY

BROCKHOUSE

FAIRMARMONTESSON

CONNELL

LOCKPORT

TORLAKE

WOOLGAR

GOODRICH

ADELPHA

BEAUCOURT

BAYSHILL

ALLISON

ALLERTON

ROSEWOOD

PLACID

EASTWICK

MINSTREL

LUDLOW

LORAHILL

CARYSFORT

STOCKBRIDGE

SINCLAIR

ELDERIDGE

DARLINGTON

BRAMSHOTT

MEADOW CREST

BURNELM

KENNY

GLADFERN

OGDEN

TAMERLANE

BRADBROOK

CREMORNE

VIBE

LEAGATE

KINGSLEA

QUEENSWAY LIONS

NORTHROP

COCHRANE

ALLAN PARK

BARCLAY

CONSOL

ROCKFIELD

TIZZARD

NORTH KINGSLEA

SPRINGBROOK

VANELLAN

FRANKWOOD

CLUESON

SAUNDERS

KIRK B

RADD

EN

OXFORD

LILLIBET

LOMA

BERL

OXFORD

MELROSE

GRENVIEW

LARSTONE

MEADOWVALE

WESLEY

ELSFIELD

UNO

GRENVIEW

SUNNYLEA

LOTHIAN

EAGLE

NORDIN

LILLIBET

VIKING LANE

MICHAEL POWER PL

SHIRES LANE

Holy Angels Catholic School

Legend

ExpresswaysHydro LineMajor ArterialMinor Arterial

Other Streets

Pending

Railroads

Shoreline

Boundaries

Non Qualifying Transportation

Transportation

1.5 km WalkLocal Streets

Rivers

Students, Bus Stops, & Boundaries

Holy Angels Students

Collector

Elementary Schoolsnm

I1 Holy Angels Bus Stops

0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.60.2Kilometres:

Parks and Vegetation

^̀

^̀

^̀

^̀

^̀

^̀

^̀

^̀

^̀

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1I1

I1

I1

I1

I1I1

I1

I1I1

I1I1

I1

I1I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1I1

I1

I1I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1I1

I1I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1I1

I1

I1

I1

KING'S MILL PARK

HUMBER MARSHES

SMYTHE PARK

SCARLETT MILLS PARK

HOME SMITH PARK

LAMBTON PARK

TOM RILEY PARK

ETIENNE BRULE PARK

LAMBTON WOODS

MAGWOOD PARK

SOUTH HUMBER PARK

ECHO VALLEY PARK

ETIENNE BRULE PARK

BLACK CREEK SITE WEST

TOM RILEY PARK

HUMBER MARSHES

JAMES GARDENS

KING'S MILL PARK

MARIE BALDWIN PARK

FAIRFIELD PARK

BLACK CREEK SITE EAST

PRINCESS MARGARET PARK

REID MANOR PARK

RUNNYMEDE PARK

PRINCESS ANNE PARK

LAMBTON PARK

SPRING GARDEN PARK

NOBLE PARK

HUMBER VALLEY PARK

3111X BLOOR ST W

LESSARD PARK

PARK LAWN PARK

GAFFNEY PARK

PARK LAWN PARK

LAMBTON - KINGSWAY PARK

ONTARIO HYDRO LANDSONTARIO HYDRO LANDS

KING'S MILL PARK

ROSETHORN PARK

WOOLNER PARKVALECREST PARK

EDEN VALLEY PARK

LAURA HILL PARK

ROYAL YORK/LELAND

EDENBROOK PARK

BELL MANOR PARKGREENFIELD PARK

HUMBERTOWN PARK

OLD MILL SITE PARK

CHESTNUT HILLS PARK

ALLANHURST PARK

SUNNYLEA PARK

HUMBER VALLEY PARK

SCARLETT MILLS PARK

KINSDALE PARK

MICHAEL POWER PARK

KING'S MILL PARK

SIX POINTS PARK

TRAYMORE PARK

DONNYBROOK PARK

HANEY PARK

KENWAY PARK

CASHMAN PARKBERESFORD PARK

HENRIETTA PARK

FLORENCE GELL PARK

EDINBOROUGH PARK

SOUTH KINGSWAY PARKETTE

ISLINGTON HEIGHTS PARK

COBBLE HILLS PARKETTE

WALLER AVENUE RAVINE LANDS

BABY POINT CLUB PARK - PRIVATE

DALRYMPLE PARK CAYUGA PARK

RAMBERT CRESCENT PARKETTE

ISLINGTON PIONEER CEMETERY

SCARLETT MILLS PARK

THORNCREST RD CENTRE ISLANDDRUMOAK ROAD PARKETTE

HAMPSHIRE HEIGHTS PARK

FIELDWAY PARKETTEGLENELLEN PARKETTE

WESTRIDGE ROAD MEDIAN STRIP

ANGLESEY BOULEVARD MEDIAN STRIP

HILLDOWNTREE PARKETTE

ROSEVALLEY PARK

SCARLETT - ST. CLAIR PARKETTE

DAVID APPLETON COMMUNITY RECREATION CTR

PHEASANT LANE EAST TRAFFIC ISLANDMAHER CIRCLE PARKETTE

KINGSWAY GATE PARKETTE

BERRY ROAD PARK

WIMBLETON ROAD NORTH PARKETTE

HARTFIELD COURT PARKETTE MARIA STREET PARKETTE

BEMERSYDE DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC

WESTRIDGE ROAD MEDIAN STRIP

EDENBROOK HILL TRAFFIC ISLAND

JANE ST - ST CLAIR AVE

TWYFORD RD TRAFFIC ISLAND

JACKSON PARKETTE



BIRCHVIEW BOULEVARD PARKETTE

WESTROSE AVE TRAFFIC ISLANDS

BURNHAMTHORPE RD ISLAND



IVY LEA CRESCENT CENTRE ISLAND

BAYSHILL DR TRAFFIC ISLAND

LAMBETH CRESCENT PARKETTE

CHESTNUT HILLS ISLAND

SPRING GARDEN RD TRAFFIC ISLAND

KING GEORGE WEST PARKETTE

EVESHAM CUL-DE-SAC

OLD MILL TERRACE CENTRE ISLAND

HARTFIELD COURT TRAFFIC ISLAND

CABOT COURT TRAFFIC ISLAND

BRULE GARDENS TRAFFIC ISLAND

NOTTINGHAM DRIVE ISLAND

WOODMERE CT CUL-DE-SAC

WESTROSE AVE

ROYAL YORK RD

JANE ST

BLOOR ST W

ANNETTE ST

DUNDAS ST W

BLOOR ST W

ISLINGTON AVE

KIPLING AVE

ST CLAIR AVE W

DURIE ST

EILEEN AVE

ABILENE DR

BERING AVE

BYWOOD DR

NORTH DR

VAN DUSEN BLVD TYRE AVE

HUMBERCREST BLVD

MERVYN AVE

ASHBOURNE DR

STRATH AVE

LELAND AVE

GOSWELL RD

ELLINS AVE

KINGSWAY CRES

JOPLING AVE N PRENNAN AVE

WINDERMERE AVE

ARDAGH ST GOVERNMENT RD

FIELD

WAY RD

HUMBERVALE BLVD

SYME

S RD

EDGEHILL RD

OLD MILL RD

WATSON AVE

BABY POINT RD

MEADOWVALE DR

WILLARD AVE

SIX POINT RD SAYBROOK AVE

BROOKSIDE AVE

CHAUNCEY AVE

WILGAR RD

ARMADALE AVE

HERNE H

ILL

HALIBURTON AVE

LAMBETH RD

CLAYMORE DR

REID MANOR

EDGEMORE DR JUDGE RD

ORRELL AVE

BURROWS AVE

HILLCROFT DR

PERRY CRES

MUNSTER AVE

HOLLOWAY RD

HUMBER TRL

PRISCILLA AVE

QUEEN MARYS DR

FINCH

LEY R

D

HARSHAW AVE

FAIRLIN DR

WHITE OAK BLVD

ABERFOYLE CRES

GOLFCREST RD

SPEARS ST

LEAMINGTON AVE

STONEGATE RD

KINSDALE LANE

ORCHARD CRES

THORNDALE AVE

EDWALTER AVE GLENELLEN DR W

ATHLONE DR

DELEMERE AVE

BENEDICT RD

VALIANT RD

RIVERBANK DR

JILLSON AVE

REXFORD RD MORLAND RD

KIRK BRADDEN RD W

FISKEN AVE

MAYFIELD AVE

CRAIK RD

VERBENA AVE

KINGSFOLD CRT

LINCOLN AVE

SKYL

ARK R

D

WILLARD AVE DURIE ST

VAN DUSEN BLVD

ARMADALE AVE

BERRY RD

EDEN

BRIDG

E DR

EAST DR

ALLIANCE AVE

VARSITY RD

COLBECK ST

WOOLNER AVE

DUNBLOOR RD

Our Lady of SorrowsStudents, Bus Stops, & Boundaries

LegendI1 OLO_Sorrow_Bus_Stops_2015

Our Lady of SorrowsBOUNDARY

Transportation - Non QualifyingTransportation - Safety/HazardsTransportation - Distance1.5 KM WalkTCDSB Students

^̀ TCDSB Schools

Hydro_LineRailroadsRivers

Transported Distance

39%

Transported Hazard

9%Transported

Non Qualifying16%

Out of Area6%

Walkers26%

Empty Seaters2%

Extenuating Circumstances

0%Special Needs

2%

Breakdown of Student Population

nm

nm

nm

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1I1

I1

I1I1

I1

I1


JUDSON

DWIGHT

BIRMINGHAM

NEW TORONTO

MIMICO

GRAND

DRUMMOND

ISLINGTON

LAKE

SHOR

E

EVANS

THE QUEENSWAYPARK LAWN

ROYAL YORK

EVANS

HORNER

ROYAL YORK

BRADHAM

JAMES STOCK

SUPERIOR CREEK

HAY

ALGOMA

QUEENS

SIXTH

MANITOBA

OXFORD

CAVELL

SYMONS

SIMPSON

LAKE

EIGHTH

STANLEY

ELMA

THIRD

MELROSE

PORTLAND

GEORGE

OURLAND

SUPERIOR

ALBANI

HEMAN

ALBERT

FIFTH

MURRIE

MILTON

STATION

MENDOTA

NEWCASTLE

HUMB

ER BA

Y PA

RK

WESLEY

HILLSIDE

QUEEN ELIZABETH

WHEATFIELD

FOURTH

VICTOR

TAYMALL

MILES

VANEVERY

ALDEN

LEGION

CENTRAL

PLASTICS

BURLINGTON

HAROLD

STRUTHERS

SECOND

EAST

BOUR

NE

MACDONALD

WINDSOR

NINTH

MORGAN

VICTORIA

DALESFORD

ALAN

CANMOTOR

CARNARVONST GEORGE

PARKER

NORRIS

SIXTEENTH

ROTHSAYMA

RINE

PARA

DE

ODONNELLMERRIDAY

INVERNESS

DISTIN

DAYTON

PRIMROSE

FIRST

ALLEN

ELIZABETH

PARK LAWN

MANCHESTER

AUDLEY

MAPLE

DOUGLAS

GARROCH

FLEECELINE

WILLOWBROOK

SKELTON LOUISA

GOLDTHORNE

EASTWICK

TOFFEE

LADY BANK

SINCLAIR

THIRTEENTH

DART

MOUT

H

MAGNIFICENT

BLUEWATER

ETONA

PENHURSTSUMMERHILL

ALEXANDER

KENNY

HARBOURVIEW

BUCKINGHAM

CREMORNE

GARNETT JANES

BARCLAY

CONSOL

EDYT

H

CAVEN

ROYAL YORK

BLUE GOOSE

ISLAN

D VIEW

SAND BEACH

OXFORD

GARROCH

MELROSE

LAKE

HILLSIDE

OXFORD

STAN

LEY

SECOND

LEGION RD N

St Leo Catholic School

Legend

ExpresswaysHydro LineMajor Arterial

Minor Arterial

Other Streets

PendingRailroadsShoreline

Boundaries1.5 km Walk

Local Streets

Rivers


St Leo Students

Collector


I1 St Leo Bus Stops

0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.20.15Kilometres:


nm

nm

nm

nm

I1 I1

I1I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1 I1I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1

I1


ST MARK CATHOLIC SCHOOL


HOLY ANGELS CATHOLIC SCHOOL

JUDSON

BERRY

GRAND

NORSEMANSTEPHEN

MIMICO

PARK LAWN

JUTLAND

DRUMMOND

PRINCE EDWARD

ISLINGTON

THE QUEENSWAY

LAKE

SHOR

E

EVANS

PARK LAWN

KIPLING

ROYAL YORK

EVANS

HORNER

ST LAWRENCE

JAMES STOCK

HAY

ALGOMA

UNO

CHARTWELL

MANITOBA

OXFORDCAVELL

CONEY

DELROY

ATHOL

YORKVIEW

QUEENS

SIMPSON

STANLEY

HIGH

AMBLESIDE

TITAN

EDGECROFT

MELROSE

BONNYVIEW

BERL

LOMA

BADGER

PORTLAND

DANIELS

OURLAND

CANNON

RINGLEY

SAYBROOK

SUPERIOR

CASTLEBAR

ALBERT

DALESFORD

CLAYMORE

STATION

MENDOTA

NEWCASTLE

PARKER

ZORRA

WESLEY

QUEEN ELIZABETH

BETHNAL

MOYNES

SMITH

VELMA

MORGAN

VICTOR

TAYMALL

ELFORD

CARDIGAN

GUTHRIE

ROTHSAY

OAKFIELD

ALDEN

LEGION

ALDGATE

PLASTICS

MILTON

BURLINGTON

HAROLD

BENTLEY

LADY BANK

WANISKA

WARNICA

CLOVERHILL

WINDSOR

STANMILLS

FERNALROY

KEYWELL

VICTORIA

LARSTONE

ALAN

CANMOTOR

AVON PARK

TENBY

HOLBROOKE

LOTHIAN

MCINTOSH

CARNARVON

SMITHFIELD

ST GEORGE

VANEVERY

BURMA

NORDIN

ASHMORE WINSLOW

FRANCES

DAYTON

ODONNELL

DODDINGTON

LILLIBET

PENHURST

EDWALTERSTONEGATE

GOLDTHORNE MERRIDAY

BALLACAINE

HILLSIDE

DISTIN

PRIMROSE

ADVANCE

HUMBER BAY PARK

ALLEN

BRADFIELD

ELIZABETH

ARNOLD

MANCHESTER

AUDLEY

DORCHESTER

BELFRY

BERRY

FAIRMAR

INVERLEIGHGEORGE

CONNELL

WOOLGAR

FIEST

A

BRAWLEY

GRENVIEW

STEPHEN

GARROCH

LORNE

BEAUCOURT

PARK

BAYSHILL

WHEATFIELD

ALLISON

FLEECELINE

BRUSSELS

ROSEWOOD

SIX POINT

WILLOWBROOK

PLACID

SKELTON

PARK LAWN

LOUISA

EASTWICK

MINSTREL

LORAHILL

DUMBARTON

STOCKBRIDGE

SINCLAIR

NORRIS

ELDERIDGE

DARLINGTON

BELL MANOR

BLUEWATER

ETONA

MAGNIFICENT

ABERLADY

SUMMERHILL

ALEXANDER

KENNY

HARBOURVIEW

BUCKINGHAM

GLADFERN

OGDENBRADBROOK

CREMORNE

BEAVERDALE

MARINE PARADE

COCHRANE

WOODFORD PARK

BARCLAY

CONSOL

KELLOGG

TIZZARD

RIDGEGATE

CAVEN

BLUE GOOSE

FRANKWOOD

SAUNDERS

GRENVIEW

MILTON

OXFORD

LILLIBETUNO

STAN

LEY

NORDIN

HUMB

ER BA

Y PA

RK

BERL

LOMA

WANISKA

LARSTONE

OXFORD

MELROSE

WOOLGAR

GARROCH

LEGION RD N

CHIMES LANE

St Louis Catholic School

Legend

ExpresswaysHydro LineMajor ArterialMinor Arterial

Other Streets

Pending

Railroads

Shoreline

Boundaries

Transportation

1.5 km WalkLocal Streets

Rivers


St Louis Students

Collector


I1 St Louis Bus Stops

0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.20.15Kilometres:


Hazard and Safety Transportation

^̀

^̀

^̀

^̀

I1

I1

I1I1

I1

I1I1I1

I1

ST MARK CATHOLIC SCHOOL


HUMBER MARSHES

HIGH PARK

HUMBER BAY PARK EAST

RENNIE PARKKING'S MILL PARK

SOUTH HUMBER PARK

HUMBER BAY PARK WEST

HUMBER MARSHES

JEFF HEALEY PARK

SIR CASIMIR GZOWSKI PARK

HUMBER BAY SHORES PARK

REID MANOR PARK

BERRY ROAD PARK

MIMICO CREEK - 2224X LAKE SHORE BLVD W

MANCHESTER PARK

QUEENSWAY PARK

PARK LAWN PARK

SHELDON LOOKOUT

SWANSEA COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTRE

PARK LAWN PARK

HUMBER MARSHES

QUEENSWAY PARK

GRAND AVENUE PARK

ROYAL YORK/LELAND

BELL MANOR PARK

SUNNYLEA PARK

JEAN AUGUSTINE PARK

KINSDALE PARK

JEAN AUGUSTINE PARK

HUMBER MARSHES

ORMSKIRK PARK

PALACE PIER PARK

MIMICO CREEK - CNR

HUMBER BAY PROMENADE PARK


SOUTH KINGSWAY PARKETTE

WALLER AVENUE RAVINE LANDS

RAMBERT CRESCENT PARKETTE

ALEXANDER PARK

MIMICO CREEK - PARK LAWN GARDINER W RAMP

WINDERMERE AVENUE PARKETTE

GLENELLEN PARKETTE

HUMBER BAY SHORES PARK

CLOCKWORK PARK

ALAN - OXFORD PARKETTEFIONA NELSON PARK


LUCY MAUD MONTGOMERY PARK

RIVERSIDE DRIVE PARKETTE

WINSLOW - DALESFORD PARKETTE

SAUNDERS CRESCENT PARKETTEMIMICO CREEK - THE QUEENSWAY

SUNNYBROOK PARKETTE

IVY LEA CRESCENT CENTRE ISLAND

HUMBER MARSHES

BAYSHILL DR TRAFFIC ISLAND

RIVERSIDE DRIVE TRAFFIC ISLAND

LAKESHORE BOULEVARD PARKLANDS

BRULE GARDENS TRAFFIC ISLAND

RIVER VALLEY CRES TRAFFIC ISLAND

ROYAL YORK RD

EVANS AVE

THE QUEENSWAY UNO DR HAY AVE

ALGOMA ST MANITOBA ST

OXFORD ST

DELROY DR

COE HILL DR

MELROSE ST

BONNYVIEW DR

GLENADEN AVE E

PORTLAND ST

SUNNYLEA AVE E

HIGH ST

HUMBERVALE BLVD

DANIELS ST

MARI

NE PA

RADE

DR

CANNON RD

GLENELLEN DR E

SIMPSON AVE

RINGLEY AVE

LOMA RD

CONEY RD

NEWCASTLE ST

GLENROY AVE

MENDOTA RD

REID MANOR

QUEEN ELIZABETH BLVD

BERL AVE

EDGEMORE DR

CASTLEBAR RD

CAVELL AVE

BETHNAL AVE

SOUTHPORT ST

OAKFIELD DR

STEPHEN DR

BURLINGTON ST

WINSTON GRV

TAYMALL AVE

BERNICE AVE

GUTHRIE AVE

SEVENOAKS AVE

IVY LEA CRES

PLASTICS AVE

MILTON ST

BENTLEY DR

AMBLESIDE AVE

ALBERT AVE

WANISKA AVE SMITHFIELD DR

KEYWELL CRT

DODDINGTON DR

TENBY ST

KINSDALE LANE

ASHMORE AVE

EDWALTER AVE MANCHESTER ST

DAYTON AVE

GLENELLEN DR W

ATHLONE DR

KENRIDGE AVE

BEAUCOURT RD

KIRK BRADDEN RD W ORMSKIRK AVE

BERRY RD

MINSTREL DR

GRENVIEW BLVD S

LOUISA ST

ELDERIDGE AVE

STEPHEN MEWS

CROWN HILL PL

LARSTONE AVE

SWANSEA MEWS

CONSOL ST

WANISKA AVE

LOMA RD

BERL AVE

OXFORD ST

MELROSE ST

ELLIS AVE

BERRY RD

GRAND AVE

WINDERMERE AVE

STEPHEN DR

PARK LAWN RD

NORSEMAN ST

St MarkStudents, Bus Stops, & Boundaries

LegendI1 St Mark Bus Stops

stmark_ProjectFix_1BOUNDARY

Transportation - Distance1.5KM walkTCDSB Students

^̀ TCDSB Schools

Hydro_LineRailroadsRivers

Transported Distance

20%

Out of Area8%

Walkers51%

Extenuating Circumstance

16%

Special Needs5%

Breakdown of Student Population

TAB 19

Select Public/Private If Private select Ed. Act. Section.

+

SAFE SCHOOLS REPORT 2013-14

Joshua 1:9

Have I not commanded you? Be strong and courageous. Do not be

frightened, and do not be dismayed, for the Lord your God is

with you wherever you go.”

Created, Draft First Tabling Review September 18, 2014 September 22, 2014 Click here to enter a date. Vincent Burzotta, Superintendent of Learning, Student Achievement & Well-being

INFORMATION REPORT

Vision: At Toronto Catholic we transform the world through witness, faith, innovation and action. Mission: The Toronto Catholic District School Board is an inclusive learning community rooted in the love of Christ. We educate students to grow in grace and knowledge and to lead lives of faith, hope and charity

G. Poole Associate Director of Academic Affairs A. Sangiorgio Associate Director of Planning and Facilities S. Pessione Associate Director of Business Services, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer Angela Gauthier Director of Education

REPORT TO

STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT AND WELL BEING, CATHOLIC EDUCATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE

of 11

A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A key goal within the TCDSB Multi Year Strategic Plan is providing all students with safe, healthy learning environments by promoting a positive school climate, inclusive of all pupils, and by promoting the prevention of bullying. A safe and supportive environment for learning is one of the most important factors that influence the quality of learning and achievement for students. The purposeful use of progressive discipline within our schools has led to a continuous decline in the number of students suspended for infractions, and a reduction in the number of instructional days that students lose as a result of serving a Suspension. It is evident that resources and intervention strategies used at the local school level to correct inappropriate behaviours exhibited by students have contributed to a steady reduction in both Suspensions and Expulsions for students. Perceptual data from Safe School Climate surveys administered to elementary and secondary students indicate that overwhelming numbers of students believe their school is a safe place in which to learn, but the data also shows that there are areas for continued focus. The Safe Schools department continues to increase the quantity and scope of its professional learning modules offered to members of the TCDSB community to educate staff and students, and provide them with knowledge and skills to create more positive, accepting and safe school environments. Informed by the local Safe and Accepting Schools Teams, all schools will review the 2013-2014 Safe Schools Plan and make adjustments to the following components: Bullying Awareness, Prevention and Intervention; Progressive Discipline; and positive school climate. B. PURPOSE 1. The Safe Schools Report for 2013-2014 will include quantitative and qualitative data related

to Safe Schools metrics, procedures, programs and other activities designed to create safe, accepting learning environments, and strengthen public confidence in the TCDSB

2. The following areas will be addressed in this report, along with actions undertaken to address evidence-informed needs:

(1) Suspension and Expulsion Data (2) Safe School Climate Surveys-Students (3) Alternative Safe Schools programs for students (4) Professional Learning to build capacity within the system (5) Actionable Items 2014-2015 to consider

3. The evidence will highlight those areas of strength and success, as well as areas for growth,

resulting in prioritized actions for the 2014-2015 school year C. BACKGROUND 1. The Safe Schools Report to the Trustees has evolved from focusing on Suspension and

Expulsion data ten years ago, to a comprehensive review and analysis of established metrics and subsequent action plans for the new school year.

of 11

D. EVIDENCE/RESEARCH/ANALYSIS

Sources of Evidence for this report include, but are not limited to:

1. Suspension and Expulsion data; 2. Secondary Safe Schools Survey and Elementary Safe & Caring Catholic School Climate Survey; 3. Safe Schools alternative programs to support student achievement and well-being; 4. Participation rates of TCDSB staff in professional learning opportunities, workshops and in-services. Below are data related to Safe Schools: SECTION 1: Suspension and Expulsion Data (Appendix A) An analysis of the five year history of Suspension and Expulsion data at TCDSB (2009-2014) indicate a downward trend in the following areas: number of Suspension Notices issued; number of students being suspended; number of students receiving multiple suspensions; and the number of days lost to Suspension. ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS [Comparison with 2012-2013 data] At the Elementary level, the data indicate that fewer students are receiving progressive discipline consequences of Suspension from school. The data represent an overall trend of decline in suspensions over the past five years. Some comparisons with the previous year (2012-2013) indicate: • Reduction in the number of Suspension Notices issued (-75) • Reduction in the number of Suspension Notices issued for “bullying” (-25). • Reduction in the number of Instructional Days lost to Suspension (-274) • Slight increase in the number of students suspended 2 or more times (+12) • Significant Reduction in the number of students who were suspended (-87). • Reduction in the number of students with an Individual Education Plan (IEP) who were suspended (-32) • Decrease in the number of students Suspended Pending Possible Expulsion under Section 310 of the Education Act (-10) • Slight decrease in Board Expulsions (-1) and slight increase School Expulsions (+3) There were positive changes in the Suspension and Expulsion data at the elementary level indicating that our schools remain safe places for students. One key area of improvement has been the reduction in the number of suspensions issued to students with an IEP. Focus will continue to support the use of alternative approaches to suspension for students with an IEP. SECONDARY SCHOOLS [Comparison with 2012-2013 data]

of 11

At the Secondary level, the data indicate that fewer students are receiving progressive discipline consequences of Suspension from school. The data also indicates a significant reduction (-1212) of notices of suspensions issued over the past five years. Some comparisons with the previous year (2012-2013) indicate: • Reduction in the number of Suspension Notices issued (-13) • Significant reduction in the number of students suspended under Section 306 of the Education Act. (-191). • Decrease in the number of Suspension Notices issued for “bullying” (-10). • Significant reduction in the number of Instructional Days Lost to Suspension (-460). • Increase in the number of students suspended 2 or more times (+178) • Considerable reduction in the number of students with an Individual Education Plan (IEP) who were suspended (-114). • No increase nor decrease in the number of students Suspended Pending Possible Expulsion under Section 310 of the Education Act (0) • Slight increase in Board Expulsions (+1) • Slight decrease in School Expulsions (-1) There continue to be significant positive changes in regards Suspensions at the secondary level relative to previous years, indicating that positive student behaviour has created safer school environments. The reduction in both Suspension Notices and Instructional Days lost to Suspension indicate that students are spending more time in school, hence improving opportunities for student achievement and well-being. One key area of growth would include increased use of alternative approaches to suspension for students suspended 2 or more times. SECTION 2: Student Perceptual Data In 2013-2014, 11,155 elementary students in grades 6 and 8 participated in the Safe and Caring Catholic School Climate Survey, and 5,358 secondary students in grades 9-12 participated in the Secondary Safe Schools Survey. Data gathered from these surveys are reported for individual schools, and as a Board. At the Board level, general trends can be identified and serve as a focus for collective inquiry and action. At the school level, the data would be reviewed by the Safe and Accepting Schools Team to gain greater insights into students’ perceptions of school safety and school climate, to advise the principal about enhanced safety procedures and programs, and to review and update the local Safe Schools Plan. ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS In February 2014, over 11,000 students in grade 6 and 8 in all TCDSB elementary schools participated in the Safe and Caring Catholic School Climate Survey. Overall, elementary students’ perceptions of school safety are very positive, with over 95% of students indicating they feel very safe or safe at school. Data also suggests that improvements have been made in the area of students’ experiencing or witnessing bullying behaviours. Results indicate that the

of 11

majority of students (74%) love or like school, and are highly engaged in their learning and other activities in the school community (over 90%). (See Appendix B1.) Some highlights from the survey indicate:

• More than 90% of students feel very safe or safe in their school, classroom, while eating lunch at school, in the hallway, and during indoor recess

• 75% of students feel very safe or safe walking/travelling to and from school (a 4% increase from last year)

• About 94% have never witnessed/experienced drug use nor alcohol use at their school • 63% reported that they have never been bullied at school; for those who say they have

been bullied: 66% have told another person about being bullied (a 4% increase from 2011-12)

• 54% indicated that they have witnessed someone being bullied at school (a decrease of 12% from 2010-2011)

Areas for further dialogue include:

• For those students who said they have been bullied, 52% have reported this bullying to a friend (a 6% increase from last year); 33% to a parent (a 3% increase from 2011-12); 26% to a staff member (a 3% increase from 2011-12); 25% did not report (Note: students may choose more than one option)

• For those who say they have witnessed someone being bullied at school: 31% reported it to a staff member; 27% to a friend (Note: students may choose more than one option)

• Continued reports of verbal abuse indicate a need for greater focus on promoting and nurturing inclusive and respectful school environments

SECONDARY SCHOOLS In November 2012, approximately 5400 students in grades 9 through 12 in all TCDSB secondary schools participated in the Safe Schools Survey. Overall, secondary students’ perceptions of school safety are very positive and have remained so over the past 3 years, as generally 94% of students report feeling very safe or safe at school. Within the 3 year timeframe, progress is evident in areas that include the witnessing of others being bullied, the reporting of bullying, and perceptions about bullying at school. (See Appendix B2.) Some highlights from the survey indicate:

• More than 90% of students feel very safe or safe in their classroom, cafeteria, at sports/after- school events, and at dismissal time

• More than 85% (and less than 90%) feel very safe or safe in the washroom, hallway and while travelling to and from school

• About 80% have never witnessed/experienced gang activity, weapons, relationship violence, and robbery at their school

• The percentage of students that have witnessed another student being bullied has decreased to less than 50%

• 73% strongly agree or agree that their school is concerned about bullying and tries to help Areas for further dialogue include:

of 11

• While the percentage of students witnessing or experiencing physical violence at school has generally decreased, this area requires further dialogue as 41% of students report having witnessed/experienced physical violence 1 to 3 times • Creating more inclusive environments remains a focus, as verbal bullying and teasing remain the most common forms of bullying, while social and cyber bullying have increased • While the reporting of being bullied or witnessing bullying has improved, of those who have been bullied or witnessed bullying, a large proportion (64% and 74% respectively) refrain from reporting it to caring adults at school. The top reasons were “It didn’t affect me personally,” and “I didn’t want to get involved” • The parking lot (22% feel very unsafe or unsafe) and washroom (14% feel very unsafe or unsafe) remain areas for dialogue with regards to student safety . SECTION 3: Safe Schools Alternative Programs (Appendix C) The TCDSB operates programs through the Safe Schools Department to provide alternative programming for students dealing with Safe Schools situations. i. Msgr. Fraser College-St. Martin Campus, formerly APPLE (TCDSB Program for Students Expelled from all Schools of the Board) The APPLE program is a short term support program for students who have been expelled from all schools of the TCDSB. The program serves elementary students grade 6-8, and secondary school students. Program staff works in a multidisciplinary team to address student strengths, needs and triggers with an aim to provide individualized academic programming and individual support at school, connections for families and students in community and designing a plan to meet the goals of the program. The goal for most students is to successfully complete the demission requirements and return to a different TCDSB secondary school.

In 2013-2014, one (1) student accessed the elementary program and 24 students were served in the secondary program. A key focus for the program has been the development of good transition planning for students returning to regular programming in a TCDSB school. ii. PEACH (Promoting Education And Community Health) The 2013-2014 school year marked the second year of a three year tri-partnership agreement. TCDSB works together with the TDSB and the PEACH community organization to serve students in the northwest quadrant of Toronto. The School Away from School (SAS) program is an intervention program that provides alternative academic programming while focusing on social and emotional needs that are causing the student to disengage from school and possibly become involved in situations where a serious Safe Schools consequence could be determined. Generally the length of time in the program is one semester. The program served 6 TCDSB secondary students, 3 who have returned to regular programming and 3 who have remained in the program for additional support.

of 11

iii. TIPSS (Transitional Intervention Program for Suspended Students) The long-term suspension program is established to provide programming for students serving a suspension of 6-20 days in length. For students receiving a suspension between 6-10 days, academic programming is provided. For students serving a suspension of 11-20 days social work assistance is provided in addition to the academic programming. Since the inception of TIPSS in 2008, over 85% of all students eligible for the long-term suspension program have been served by TIPSS teachers at sessions in Toronto Public Libraries. In 2013-14 95% of all students eligible for TIPSS were served. In situations where students have not attended TIPSS, the school will provide the student /family or detention centre with work packages.

The TIPSS teachers play a vital role in visiting and securing academic work packages from the suspended student’s home school to ensure that any gap in the student’s learning is minimized during the period of suspension. The TIPSS teacher completes a Student Action Plan and continues to visit the home school to drop off the work completed by the student, retrieve the new work assignments and provide an assessment of the student’s progress upon the return to school. SECTION 4: Professional Learning for TCDSB Stakeholders (Appendix D) In 2013-2014, the Safe Schools Department offered professional learning on diverse safe schools topics to students, parents, TCDSB staff members and community partners. Students: Consistent with the research that recognizes students play a critical role in creating positive and safe school environments, key learning opportunities were offered to both elementary and secondary students. In November 2013, a Bullying Awareness and Prevention Symposium for elementary school teams that included student leaders, provided strategies for students to promote our central theme “We ALL Belong” in their school communities and work to prevent bullying behaviours.

Parents: As a child’s primary educator, parents play an integral role in supporting the safe and accepting climate at the school. One key area of interest for parents is bullying, so to this end, parents are included as active members of the school’s team, attending the elementary Bullying Awareness and Prevention Symposium during Ontario’s Bullying Prevention Week in November. In addition, two parents with the assistance of Safe School staff delivered a presentation on strategies for parents when addressing bullying.

At the local level, parent groups often invited the Safe Schools Department to present at Information Evenings and CSAC meetings. TCDSB Staff Members:

of 11

Throughout last school year, a significant number of TCDSB staff members participated in one or more of the various Safe Schools professional learning modules, in-services, refresher courses, principal/vice principal presentations, “lunch and learn” school presentations, sessions or workshops (see Section E. Metrics). All of these sessions are offered by members of the TCDSB Safe Schools Department. Feedback received from staff members and members of OECTA shape and inform the professional learning modules for the next school year.

Participation of TCDSB staff members at safe schools conferences and workshops offered by external organizations and agencies are often subsidized by the Safe Schools Department.

E. METRICS AND PROGRESS (2013-14 METRICS) 2013-2014 Metrics Evidence/Deliverables

1. Diversify and

expand the professional learning opportunities and modes of delivery to TCDSB staff to address Safe Schools needs within the system

6 new module topics (17 topics total ) delivered in 2013-2014

Certification Series: 630 participants (social workers, CYW,

educational assistants, teachers, psychologists, administrators, support staff, office staff, custodians)

Interdisciplinary professional learning opportunities with various

TCDSB stakeholders: o Day of Pastoral Care – 150 TSU/Administrators o New Teacher Induction Program – 140 new teachers o Toronto Occasional Teacher Local – 90 occasional

teachers o Teacher Delegation – 25 TSU Members o Police/School Board Orientation – 164 Administrators

and 56 Officers o Administrative Training and Workshops – 400

principals/vice principals o Bullying Awareness Prevention Symposium

840 participants (students, parents, school staff)

o Lunch and Learn Sessions – 18 schools (414 staff) o Sunday Morning Toronto Police Service Lockdown

Training: 25 participants (custodians, office staff,

support staff, teachers, administration) o Resolution Conference and Mediation Circles:

155 participants (social workers, CYW, educational assistants, teachers, students, officers, Ontario Association of Social Work)

of 11

o Threat Assessment Training and Related Workshops: 143 participants (social workers, CYW,

educational assistants, teachers, psychologists, administrators, support staff, office staff, officers, Ontario Association of Social Work)

o Rosalie Hall (THINK campaign) – 40 participants o Catholic Charities Allocations Committee (TIPSS social

worker and finance community representatives)

2. Develop and

share deeper understanding of the manifestation of students’ exceptionalities consistent with the IPRC process, and provide precise and targeted learning about effective deployment of progressive discipline strategies in order to reduce suspension issued to students with an IEP

Targeted certification modules to better understand students’

exceptionalities and effective progressive discipline strategies to promote positive and pro-social behaviours:

o Understanding Progressive Discipline and Creating an Effective Progressive Discipline Plan

o Understanding and Responding to Elementary Student Behaviour

o Effective Classroom Management (Elementary) o Addressing Challenging Behaviour in Secondary Schools

Promote alternatives to suspension and the use of Mitigating and Other Factors document when implementing progressive discipline strategies.

From 2009/2010 to 2013/2014 there has been a 27% reduction in the number of suspension issued to IEP students.

From 2012/2013 to 2013/2014 there has been a 14% reduction in the number of suspension issued to IEP students.

L’Arche presentation at the Elementary Bullying Symposium

of 11

3. To increase parent engagement in support of student well-being by providing a variety of learning opportunities about Safe Schools initiatives, procedures and areas of concern

Elementary Bullying Symposium – Safe Schools staff trained a

team of parents on how to respond effectively to bullying behaviours (We All Belong Multimedia Toolkit- COPA). This parent team delivered a presentation at the Elementary Bullying Symposium targeted to parents, teachers and students.

Presentations to CSAC communities

Presentations at the Safe Schools Advisory Committee

Support provided to parents of students involved in Safe Schools situations: (Pre-Expulsion Hearing Meetings, Fresh Start/School Expulsion Transitions, Board Expulsion Program Transitions, ShadowBox, Threat Assessment, Resolution Conference and Mediation Circles)

4. To enhance

student leadership at the school level in support of safe and accepting school environments.

Elementary School Bullying Symposium (330 student

participants, 20 students leaders)

Student Representation on the Safe Schools Advisory Committee

Student Representative on local Safe and Accepting Schools Teams

Safe Schools presentations at the Catholic School Leadership Impact Team and Elementary School Leadership Impact Team

F. ACTIONABLE ITEMS FOR 2014-15

1. Continue to diversify and expand the professional learning opportunities and modes of delivery including embracing 21st century learning.

2. Expand targeted professional learning to address students suspended two or more times.

3. Continue to focus on professional learning opportunities that promote a deeper understanding

of students’ exceptionalities and strategies to promote positive behaviour.

4. Continue to enhance student leadership in the area of safe and accepting schools.

of 11

5. Continue to increase parent engagement in Safe Schools initiatives, procedures and to build parent capacity in understanding safe and caring school environments.

G. CONCLUDING STATEMENT This report is for the consideration of the Board

APPENDIX A

Notice of Suspension, Education Act §.306

TCDSB All Students TCDSB §.306 Suspension

Secondary Students

Sec. §.306 Suspension

Elementary Students

Elem. §.306 Suspension

2009-2010 92,134 4700 31,022 3232 61,112 1468

2010-2011 91,948 4345 31,105 3001 60,843 1344

2011-2012 91,924 3864 31,238 2531 60,686 1333

2012-2013 91,596 3269 31,038 2033 60,555 1236

2013-2014 91,115 3180 30,631 2020 60,484 1161

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

80000

90000

100000

All Students TCDSB SchoolExpulsion

Secondary Sec. &306Suspension

ElementaryStudents

Elem. &306Suspension

Notice of Suspension, Education Act§.306

2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014

APPENDIX A

Days Lost to §.306 Suspension

TCDSB All Students TCDSB Days Lost

Secondary Students

Sec. Days Lost

Elementary Students

Elem. Days Lost

2009-2010 92,134 11,502 31,022 8813 61,112 2689

2010-2011 91,948 10,000 31,105 7756 60,843 2244

2011-2012 91,924 8802 31,238 6358 60,686 2444

2012-2013 91,596 7692 31,038 5450 60,555 2242

2013-2014 91,115 6958 30,631 4990 60,484 1968

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,000

80,000

90,000

100,000

Days Lost Students Days Lost Days Lost

All Students TCDSB Secondary Sec. ElementaryStudents

Elem.

Days Lost to §.306 Suspension

2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014

APPENDIX A

Number of Students Suspended 2009-2014

TCDSB All Students TCDSB #Students Suspended

Secondary Students

Sec. #Students Suspended

Elementary Students

Elem. #Students Suspended

2009-2010 92,134 3098 31,022 2093 61,112 1005

2010-2011 91,948 2946 31,105 2000 60,843 946

2011-2012 91,924 2611 31,238 1704 60,686 907

2012-2013 91,596 2376 31,038 1505 60,555 871

2013-2014 91,115 2098 30,631 1314 60,484 784

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

80000

90000

100000

All Students TCDSB #StudentsSuspended

Secondary Sec. #StudentsSuspended

ElementaryStudents

Elem. #StudentsSuspended

Number of Students Suspended 2009-2014

2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014

APPENDIX A

Number of Students with an IEP Suspended

TCDSB All Students

TCDSB #Students Suspended -IEP

Secondary Students

Sec. #Students Suspended-IEP

Elem. Students

Elem #Students Suspended-IEP

2009-2010 92,134 1286 31,022 803 61,112 483

2010-2011 91,948 1219 31,105 794 60,843 425

2011-2012 91,924 1159 31,238 726 60,686 433

2012-2013 91,596 1090 31,038 635 60,555 455

2013-2014 91,115 944 30,631 521 60,484 423

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

80000

90000

100000

All Students TCDSB #StudentsSuspended -IEP

Secondary Sec. #StudentsSuspended-IEP

Elem. Students Elem #StudentsSuspended-IEP

Number of Students with an IEP Suspended

2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014

APPENDIX A

Number of §.310 Suspension Pending Possible Expulsion (SPX) issued

TCDSB All Students TCDSB

§.310 SPX

Secondary Students

Sec. §.310 SPX

Elementary Students

Elem.

§.310 SPX

2009-2010 92,134 198 31,022 164 61,112 34

2010-2011 91,948 201 31,105 153 60,843 48

2011-2012 91,924 181 31,238 145 60,686 36

2012-2013 91,596 192 31,038 150 60,555 42

2013-2014 91,115 182 30,631 150 60,484 32

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

80000

90000

100000

All Students TCDSB §.310 SPX Secondary Sec. §.310 SPX ElementaryStudents

Elem. §.310 SPX

Number of §.310 Suspension Pending Possible Expulsion (SPX) issued

2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014

APPENDIX A

Education Art §.310 Board Expulsions

TCDSB All Students TCDSB Board Expulsion

Secondary Students

Sec. Board Expulsion

Elementary Students

Elem. Board Expulsions

2009-2010 92,134 55 31,022 50 61,112 5

2010-2011 91,948 41 31,105 37 60,843 4

2011-2012 91,924 31 31,238 25 60,686 6

2012-2013 91,596 25 31,038 23 60,555 2

2013-2014 91,115 25 30,631 24 60,484 1

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

80000

90000

100000

All Students TCDSB BoardExpulsion

Secondary Sec. BoardExpulsion

ElementaryStudents

Elem. BoardExpulsions

Education Art §.310 Board Expulsions

2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014

APPENDIX A

Education Act §.310 School Expulsions

TCDSB All Students TCDSB School Expulsion

Secondary Students

Sec. School Expulsion

Elem. Students

Elem. School Expulsions

2009-2010 92,134 41 31,022 38 61,112 3

2010-2011 91,948 35 31,105 31 60,843 4

2011-2012 91,924 41 31,238 38 60,686 3

2012-2013 91,596 58 31,038 57 60,555 1

2013-2014 91,115 60 30,631 56 60,484 4

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

80000

90000

100000

All Students TCDSB SchoolExpulsion

Secondary Sec. SchoolExpulsion

Elem. Students Elem. SchoolExpulsions

Education Act §.310 School Expulsions

2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014

Safe Schools Department & Educational Research Appendix B1 Elementary Safe Schools Survey

Comparative Review

A. SCHOOL SAFETY Indicators 2013-2014 2012-2013 2011-2012 Respondents 11,155 12,031 11,883

Feel Very Safe or Safe in school 95.2% 96.3% 95.8%

Feel Very Safe or Safe in the classroom 95.4% 97.2% 96.7%

Feel Very Safe or Safe while eating lunch 93.4% 94.1% 93.5%

Feel Very Safe or Safe in the hallway 91.1% 91.7% 92.1%

Feel Very Safe or Safe outside during recess 82.2% 83.2% 85.3%

Feel Very Safe or Safe during indoor recess 93.3% 94.8% 94.7%

Feel Very Safe or Safe in the washroom 86.2% 86.4% 86.7%

Feel Very Safe or Safe at extra-curricular activities 87.4% 88.2% 88.5%

Feel Very Safe or Safe on the stairs or stairwells 83.8% N/D N/D

B. UNSAFE ACTIONS Activities Witnesses/Experienced Years Never 1-3 times 4-6 times 7+

Physical Violence

2013 35.4% 44.2% 10.1% 8.5%

2012 35.6% 45.3% 10.1% 8.0%

2011 32.0% 45.5% 11.6% 9.5%

Drug Use

2013 94.0% 3.4% 0.3% 0.4%

2012 94.0% 3.5% 0.5% 0.5%

2011 93.3% 4.0% 0.7% 0.6%

Racial Conflicts 2013 – Inter-Racial Conflicts

2013 63.0% 24.1% 4.9% 3.2%

2012 58.5% 28.1% 5.8% 5.0%

2011 55.6% 28.3% 7.3% 6.1%

Verbal Abuse

2013 32.1% 31.2% 13.3% 20.7%

2012 33.7% 31.0% 13.4% 20.2%

2011 29.9% 30.5% 14.2% 23.5%

Gang Activity

2013 87.9% 7.7% 1.1% 1.2%

2012 87.2% 8.4% 1.5% 1.2%

2011 84.1% 10.7% 1.8% 1.6%

Weapons in school

2013 88.7% 8.5% 0.6% 0.4%

2012 88.6% 8.7% 0.5% 0.4%

2011 86.7% 10.4% 0.8% 0.5%

Theft

2013 62.4% 26.3% 5.0% 4.1%

2012 66.1% 24.7% 4.6% 3.2%

2011 62.8% 26.6% 4.9% 4.1%

Boy – Girl violence 2012 72.6% 20.2% 3.6% 2.1%

2011 68.7% 21.9% 4.0% 3.2%

Relationship Violence * 2013 81.7% 11.2% 2.2% 1.4%

Negative Actions based on sexual orientation (Gr. 8 only)

2012 80.0% 11.8% 2.5% 3.6%

2011 75.5% 15.0% 3.0% 4.8%

Harassment based on sexual orientation (grade 8 only) *

2013 85.7% 7.5% 1.4% 2.1%

Exclusion based on sexual orientation (grade 8 only) *

2013 86.7% 7.7% 1.2% 1.1%

Inappropriate sexual comments (grade 8 only) *

2013 48.4% 25.2% 8.3% 14.9%

* New questions in 2013

C. BULLYING

In the past year, how often have you been bullied?

Years Never 1-3 times 4-6 times 7+

2012 62.5% 24.8% 5.8% 4.9%

2011 59.6% 26.2% 6.3% 5.7%

Since September, how times have you been bullied at school?


2013 63.3% 22.6% 5.7% 5.1%

In the past year, what form(s) of bullying have you experienced? Choose all that apply

Years Verbal Physical Social Unwanted Teasing

Cyber

2012 56.1% 20.5% 23.3% 49.4% 12.5%

2011 56.7% 20.4% 22.5% 51.0% 11.9%

Since September, in what way(s) have you been bullied at school? You may choose more than one

Year Verbal (name

calling)

Physical Social (being

excluded,

gossip)

Constant unwanted teasing / joking

Cyber (social media)

Inappropriate

sexual

comments

(grade 8 only)

2013 72.3% 19.5% 46.0% 47.5% 13.4% 15.6%

Did you report this bullying you experienced?

Years Yes

2012 61.7%

2011 61.9%

Since September, have you told another person about being bullied?

Years Yes

2013 65.5%

To whom did you report this bullying you experienced? Choose all that apply

Years Staff member

Friend Parent Family member

Other Priest /

Nun

Police

officer

2013 25.6% 51.5% 33.4% 19.2% N/D 1.2% 0.8%

2012 22.8% 46.0% 31.0% 18.6% 4.8% N/D N/D

2011 22.6% 47.5% 29.7% 19.2% 5.8% N/D N/D

In the past year, have you witnessed someone being bullied at your school

Years Yes

2012 54.9% 2011 58.3%

Since September, have you witnessed another student being bullied at school?

Years Yes

2013 53.9%

Since September, did you report this bullying you witnessed?

Years Yes

2013 43.5%

2012 47.3%

2011 45.3%

To whom did you report this bullying you witnessed? Choose all that apply

Years Staff member

Friend Parent Family member

Other Priest /

Nun

Police

officer

2013 30.6% 26.7% 11.9% 6.1% N/D 0.4% 0.4%

2012 34.1% 24.4% 11.9% 6.3% 4.7% N/D N/D

2011 30.7% 23.8% 11.1% 6.8% 5.8% N/D N/D

How much of a problem do you think bullying is in your school?

Years Huge problem Somewhat of a problem

Not a problem

2012 20.7% 51.6% 25.2% 2011 20.8% 52.4% 24.4%


Years Huge problem A problem Somewhat of a problem

Not a problem

2013 15.0% 22.4% 38.4% 20.3%

D. SCHOOL CLIMATE Strongly Agree or Agree with the following statements: 2013-2014 2012-2013 2011-2012

My school promotes Catholic values and practices 93.3% 94.7% 94.0%

Students in our school care about each other 76.1% 78.6% 76.2%

All students get along regardless of race, culture, gender, and ability level 72.9% 73.9% 69.5%

My school is a healthy and active place to be 87.0% 89.2% 88.1%

Other students at school make me feel like I belong 83.6% 85.7% 85.8%

It is important to involve students in school leadership 90.8% 91.6% 91.3%

Students’ opinions are encouraged and included in all parts of school life 83.2% 85.0% 82.2%

I feel that in school, people are interested in me as a person 80.3% 81.7% 81.9% Notes:

Under section B: Unsafe Actions o The question regarding “Negative Actions based on sexual orientation” was changed to three separate

questions “Harassment based on sexual orientation, Exclusion based on sexual orientation, Inappropriate sexual comments” for the 2013-2014 survey.

Under section C: Bullying o The questions are analyzed as a sub-set of the full responses in the going deeper sections.

- “Since September, what way(s) have you been bullied in school?” - “Since September, have you told another person about being bullied?” - “To whom did you report this bullying you experienced?” - “Since September, did you report this bullying you witnessed?” - To whom did you report this bullying you witnessed?

Appendix B2

Safe Schools Department & Educational Research

Secondary Safe Schools Survey Comparative Review

A. SCHOOL SAFETY

Indicators 2013-2014 2012-2013 2011-2012

Respondents 5,358 5,668 5,429

Feel Very Safe or Safe in school 93.7% 94.1% 93.4%

Feel Very Safe or Safe in the classroom 95.8% 96.9% 96.0%

Feel Very Safe or Safe in the cafeteria 91.4% 92.7% 91.3%

Feel Very Safe or Safe in the hallway 89.5% 90.2% 89.4%

Feel Very Safe or Safe in the parking lot 76.8% 79.4% 75.3%

Feel Very Safe or Safe in the washroom 85.2% 85.4% 84.5%

Feel Very Safe or Safe at sports/after school events 92.0% 92.5% 92.4%

Feel Very Safe or Safe at dismissal time 91.9% 91.3% 90.5%

Feel Very Safe or Safe travelling to and from school 86.0% 86.1% 84.7%

B. UNSAFE ACTIONS

Activities Witnesses/Experienced Years Never 1-3 times 4-6 times 7+

Physical Violence

2013 45.9% 41.0% 6.6% 5.3%

2012 35.5% 46.6% 9.8% 7.1%

2011 34.1% 45.8% 10.5% 7.7%

Drug Use

2013 47.5% 26.1% 9.3% 16.1%

2012 42.0% 25.8% 10.4% 20.4%

2011 41.1% 24.8% 10.2% 21.6%

Inter-racial Conflict

2013 59.3% 27.2% 6.7% 5.3%

2012 58.9% 27.4% 6.1% 5.0%

2011 56.4% 28.2% 6.5% 5.1%

Gang Activity

2013 81.0% 12.3% 2.9% 2.4%

2012 79.9% 12.6% 2.8% 2.9%

2011 76.4% 14.2% 3.3% 3.2%

Weapons

2013 79.7% 14.9% 1.8% 2.3%

2012 78.1% 15.5% 2.6% 2.1%

2011 76.5% 15.8% 2.8% 2.4%

Alcohol Use

2013 72.1% 17.1% 4.2% 5.4%

2012 68.4% 19.6% 5.0% 5.1%

2011 66.3% 20.2% 5.2% 5.8%

Theft

2013 48.1% 32.0% 9.9% 8.6%

2012 38.2% 35.3% 13.2% 11.8%

2011 37.1% 34.8% 13.3% 12.2%

Relationship Violence

2013 80.5% 13.8% 2.4% 2.1%

2012 76.5% 17.6% 2.5% 2.0%

2011 74.2% 18.3% 2.7% 2.3%

Homophobia 2012 58.6% 24.0% 6.1% 9.5%

2011 55.6% 23.6% 7.3% 10.3%

Harassment based on sexual orientation *

2013 76.3% 15.1% 3.8% 3.8%

* = new question

C. BULLYING

In the past year, how often have you been bullied?


2013 72.4% 18.5% 3.2% 3.7%

2012 69.8% 20.7% 3.0% 4.0%

2011 70.5% 19.9% 3.0% 3.3%

In the past year, what form(s) of bullying have you experienced? Choose all that apply

Years Verbal Physical Social Sexual Cyber Teasing

2013 66.3% 21.1% 31.7% 8.4% 25.4% 53.4%

2012 66.6% 19.1% 26.3% 7.4% 20.3% 52.7%

2011 67.5% 22.7% 27.5% 7.9% 20.8% 51.8%

Did you report this bullying you experienced to a staff member?

Years Yes

2013 20.1%

2012 19.6%

2011 15.1%

In the past year, have you witnessed another student being bullied at your school?

Years Yes No

2013 49.2% 44.6%

2012 55.4% 37.5%

2011 56.0% 35.2%

Did you report this bullying you witnessed to a staff member?

Years Yes

2013 13.7%

2012 12.2%

2011 10.8%


Years Huge Problem

Somewhat of a Problem

Not a Problem

No Response

2013 11.5% 40.8% 43.9% 3.8%

2012 11.0% 44.5% 40.4% 4.1%

2011 11.0% 46.0% 38.9% 4.1%

Notes for internal dialogue:

Under section B: Unsafe Actions o The question regarding “Homophobia” was changed to “Harassment based on sexual orientation”

for the 2013-2014 survey.

Under section C: Bullying o The questions are analyzed as a sub-set of the full responses in the going deeper sections.

- “In the past year, what form(s) of bullying have you experienced?” - “Did you report this bullying you experienced to a staff member?” - “Did you report this bullying you witnessed to a staff member?”

o The 2 new questions that were piloted last year were added again this year and have been included in the final report. - “Did you report any form of bullying you experienced?” - “Did you report any form of bullying you witnessed?”

TAB 20

Status Quo

Our Lady Of Sorrows OTG 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027

Status Quo: Pupil Count 542 786 781 796 787 794 797 815 817 814 824 826 868 876 913

Status Quo: Rate of Utilization (%) 145% 144% 147% 145% 147% 147% 150% 151% 150% 152% 152% 160% 162% 168%

St. Mark OTG 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027



Holy Angels OTG 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027



St. Louis OTG 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027



St. Leo OTG 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027



³E³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E³E

³E³E ³E

³E

³E³E

³E

³E

³E³E

³E³E

³E

³E

³E³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

GLENLAKE AVE

STOCK

AVE

ELSFIE

LD RD

DWIGH

T AVE

GOVERNMENT RD

LAKE SHORE BLVD W

JUDSON ST

BURNHAMTHORPE RDST JOHNS RD

DUNDAS ST W

GARDINER EXPY

RUNN

YMED

E RD

PRINC

E EDW

ARD D

R S

KIPLIN

G AVE

STEPH

EN DR

SOUTH KINGSWAY

LYNNGROVE AVE

SIMPSON AVE

ASTORIA AVE

BERING AVE

BLAC K CREEK BLVD

MARIA ST

ARMA

DALE

AVE

23 ST

NEW TORONTO ST

VARSITY RD

EVANS AVE

THORNCREST RD

SWA N AVE

ROYA

L YOR

K RD

KING GEORGES RD

RATHBURN RD

WIMBLETON RD

E L LISPAR

K RD

NORSEMAN ST

NORTHDR

EAST DR

THE QUEENSWAY

25 ST

PARK

LAWN

RD

QUEB

EC AV

E

HENRIETTA ST

8 ST

RYDING AVE

BADGER DR

JASPER AVE

9 ST

BALLA

CAINE

DR

SPEAR

S ST

2 ST

BLOOR ST W

MANITOBA ST

BLACK CREEK TR AIL

CAYUGA AVE

PRINCE GEORGE DR

HAY AVE

13 ST

LANOR AVE

GRAN

D AVE

CORD ELLAAVE

ST MARKS RD

ANGLESEY BLVD

JUDGE

RD

HILLD

ALE R

D

EILEEN AVE

ROBINGLADE DR

NEWCASTLE ST

OXFORD ST

VAN DUSEN BLVD

ST CLAIR AVE W

36 ST

BIRMINGHAM ST

MIMICOCREEK TRAIL

PRINCESS MARGARET BLVD

16 ST

17 ST

DELROY DR

15 ST

4 ST

WESLE

Y ST

PAUL

ART D

R

SUNNYLEA AVE E

RIVERCREST R D

HUMBERVIEW RD

WILLA

RD AV

E

LAKE CRES

3 ST

MELROSE ST

SAYBROOK AVE

EAGL

E RD OLD MILL DR

CAVELL AVE

EDEN BROOKH ILL

BEAVERBROOK AVE

FIR WOOD CRES

BROO

KSIDE

AVE

PRITCHARD AVE

33 ST

PORTLAND STGL

E NDONWYNNE RD

OLD MILL RD

37 ST

PRINCESS ANNECRES

HARJO

LYN DR

SHAV

ER AV

E N

GREAT OAK DR

CLAYMORE DR

DANIELS ST

ADVANCE RD

ACORNAVE

GREN

VIEW

BLVD SSIX POINT RD

QUEEN

S AVE

HIGH P

ARK A

VE

BERNICE CRE S

24 ST

ORRELL AVE

BYWOOD DR

ATHOL AVE

RINGLEY AVE

CHAR

T WEL L

R D

CARSO

N ST

EDGECROFT RD

ABILENE DR

ELLINS AVE

14 ST

FOXWELL ST

WATSO

N AVE

32 ST

35 ST

LOMA

RD

JAMES ST

LELAND AVE

OLD OAK RD

FIELDWAY RD

LAVINI

A AVE

GRAY

AVE

CHAR

LESTO

N RD

SMITH

WOOD

DR

22 ST

CORBETT AVE

ASH CRES

NORDIN AVE

HILLCR

OFT D

R

VELMADR

LUNN

ESS RD

LESMAR DR

FAIRFIELD AVE

TOWNS R D

CRON

IN DR

BLAKE

TON R

DHEDGES BLVD

PREN

NAN A

VE

CE NTRE RD

RIVERCOVE D R

RABB

IT LA

NE

ALGOMA ST

POPL A

RAV

E

CHAUNCEY AVE

GEOR

GE ST

WHEAT

FIELD

RD

MEDU

LLA AV

E

PRINC

ETON R

D

HALLM

ARK A

VEALD

ERBR

AE AV

E DELTA

STWA

RWOO

D RD

BELLM

AN AV

E

YORKVIEW DR

ARCHE R HILLD

R

20 ST

19 ST

21 ST

CASTLEBAR RD

BERE

SFORD

AVE

BELVIA

RD

KNOLLDR

ELMA ST

HEMAN STALBANI ST

MURRIE ST

WOOLNER AVE

MABE L LE AVE

TERRY DR

TITAN RD

PHEASANT LANE

27 ST

WINDERMERE AVECOE HILLDR

MU

NSTER AVE

ISLING

TON A

VE

HORNER AVE

SCAR LETT RD

B ROW

NSLI N

E

WILM

AR RD

MARINE PARAD

EDR

WESTRO

SEAVE

VANS

CO RD

FAIRV

IEW AV

E

SYM

ES RD

L AMBETH RD

WESTON RD

KINGS

WAY CR ES

THE KINGSWAY

ELLIS AVE

6 ST

COLBO

RNE L

ODGE

DR

GLENAGAR DR

7 ST

HALIB

URTO

N AVE

THEE

ASTM

ALL

HI GH W

AY427

JANE S

T

CLEND

ENAN

AVE

ALDER

CREST

RD

ROCK

CLIFFE

BLVD

GILMO

UR AV

E

HIGH S

T

RIVERSIDE DR

30 ST

VIELLA ST

PRINC

EEDW

ARDD

R N

UNO D

R

RIVERWOODPK Y

38 ST

CONEY RD

MART

IN GR

OVE R

D

HIGH PARKTRAIL

ANTIOCH DR

EVELY

NAVE

BETA

ST

LAWS S

T

MONK

TON A

VE

DURIE

ST

LOTH

IAN AV

E

RIMILTON AVE

SILVE

RHILL

DR

K ENN

E DY

AVE

LAURE

L AVE

SHAV

ER AV

E S

BONNYVIEWDR

39 ST

26 ST

ROYALAV ON CRES

MEAD

OWBA

NK RD

RAVEN SCREST DR

SHOR

NCLIF

FE RD

OURLA

ND AV

E

ASHB

OURN

E DR

31ST

WEST

RD

ED GEHIL

L RD

CY NTHIA RD

BURR

OWS

AVE

BABY POINT CRE S

DUNE

DIN DR

BOTFI

ELD AV

E

EVELYN CRES

NORT

H CAR

SON S

T

STATIO

N RD

AGAR CRES

CULN

AN AV

E

GAMM

A ST

LAPP ST

TOR LA

KE CRES

ATOMI

C AVE

DEER PEN RD

VICKER

S RD

VALECREST

D R

Park LawnCemetary

St. GeorgeGolf and

Country Club

IslingtonGolf Club

King'sMill Park

HUMBER RIVER

HUMB ER RIVER TR I B

BLACK CREEK

MIMICOCREEK

ChristTheKing

St. Teresa

St. Leo

St. Louis

Holy Angels

St. Elizabeth

St. Mark

Our Ladyof Peace

Our Ladyof Sorrows

St. Pius X

JosyfCardinalSlipyj

St.Gregory

St. CeciliaJamesCulnan

St. James

SantaMaria

Our Lady of VictoryScenario 1 - Status Quo

¯

0 21 Km

TCDSB Planning Services April 2015

North: South lot line St George's Golf and Country Club, HumberRiverEast: Humber RiverSouth: From the Canadian Pacific Railway to Six Point Rd, Islington Ave, Through Fairfield Park, Leland Ave, Royal York Rd, Glenroy Ave, Prince Edward Dr S, South lot linePark Lawn Cemetery & King's Mill ParkWest: Islington Ave, Orrell Ave, West lot line of 1416 Islington Ave, Through lot 1412 Islington Ave, North lot line of 1410 Islington Ave, East lot line of Islington Golf Club, Dundas St W,Between lots 5359 & 5365 Dundas St W, Canadian Pacific Railway

North: From the Canadian Pacific Railway to Six Point Rd, Islington Ave, Through Fairfield Park, Leland AveEast: Mimico Creek, Mimico Creek Trail, Berry Rd, Royal York RdSouth: Gardiner ExpresswayWest: Canadian Pacific Railway

North: Canadian Pacific RailwayEast: Mimico CreekSouth: Toronto shorelineWest: South through Railyard, Drummond St, Dwight Ave, Lakeshore Blvd W, Sand Beach Rd, Nautical Lane

North: Gardiner Expressway, Royal York Rd, Berry Rd, Mimico Creek TrailEast: Mimico CreekSouth: Canadian Pacific RailwayWest: Islington Ave

North: Glenroy Ave, Prince Edward Dr S, South lot line of ParkLawn Cemetary & King's Mill ParkEast: Humber RiverSouth: Toronto shorelineWest: Royal York Rd, Mimico Creek

Our Lady of Sorrows Boundary Holy Angels Boundary

St. Leo Boundary St. Louis Boundary St. Mark Boundary


RailwayStreets

ParksWater & Rivers

Fixed AttendanceBoundaries


DRUMMOND ST

CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY

SAND BEACH RDNAUTICAL LANE

ROY A

LYOR

K RD

BERRY RD

ISLIN

GTON

AVE

ISLING

TONA

VE

CANA

DIANP

ACI FIC

RAILW

AY

ROYA

L YOR

KRD

GLENROY AVE

North lot line of 1410 Islington AveLot 1412 Islington AveWest lot line of 1416 Islington Ave

Lots 5359 & 5365 Dundas St W CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY

DUNDAS ST W

MIMICO CREEK TRAIL

Consolidation of St. Louis into St. Leo




St. Mark OTG 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027



Holy Angels OTG 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027



St. Louis OTG 2014 2015 2016 *2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027



After Consolidation: Pupil Count 244 255 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

After Consolidation: Rate of

Utilization (%)68% 71% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

St. Leo OTG 2014 2015 2016 *2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027




After Consolidation: Rate of

Utilization (%)64% 70% 109% 110% 112% 112% 114% 119% 120% 120% 120% 120% 120%

*Note: Consolidation of St. Louis into St. Leo is recommended for the 2017‐18 school year.

³E³E

³E

³E

³E

³E³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E³E

³E³E ³E

³E

³E³E

³E

³E

³E³E

³E³E

³E

³E

³E³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³X

GLENLAKE AVE

STOCK

AVE

ELSFIE

LD RD

DWIGH

T AVE

GOVERNMENT RD

LAK E SHORE BLVD W

JUDSON ST


DUNDAS ST W

GARDINER EXPY

RUNN

YMED

E RD

PRINC

E EDW

ARD D

R S

KIPLIN

G AVE

STEPH

EN DR

SOUTH KINGSWAY

LYNNGROVE AVE

SIMPSON AVE

ASTORIA AVE

BERING AVE

BLAC K CREEK BLVD

MARIA ST

ARMA

DALE

AVE

23 ST

NEW TORONTO ST

VARSITY RD

EVANS AVE

THORNCREST RD

SWA N AVE

ROYA

L YOR

K RD

KING GEORGES RD

RATHBURN RD

WIMBLETON RD

E L LISPAR

K RD

NORSEMAN ST

NORTHDR

EAST DR

THE QUEENSWAY

25 ST

PARK

LAWN

RD

QUEB

EC AV

E

HENRIETTA ST

8 ST

RYDING AVE

BADGER DR

JASPER AVE

9 ST

BALLA

CAINE

DR

SPEAR

S ST

2 ST

BLOOR ST W

MANITOBA ST

BLACK CREEK TR AIL

CAYUGA AVE

PRINCE GEORGE DR

HAY AVE

13 ST

LANOR AVE

GRAN

D AVE

CORD ELLAAVE

ST MARKS RD

ANGLESEY BLVD

HILLD

ALE R

D

EILEEN AVE

ROBINGLADE DR

NEWCASTLE ST

OXFORD ST

VAN DUSEN BLVD

ST CLAIR AVE W

36 ST

BIRMINGHAM ST

MIMICOCREEK TRAIL


16 ST

17 ST

DELROY DR

15 ST

4 ST

WESLE

Y ST

PAUL

ART D

R

SUNNYLEA AVE E

RIVERCRES T R D

HUMBERVIEW RD

WILLA

RD AV

E

LAKE CRES

3 ST

MELROSE ST

SAYBROOK AVE

EAGL

E RD OLDMILL DR

CAVELL AVE

ED EN BROOK HIL L

BEAVERBROOK AVE

FIR WOOD CRES

BROO

KSIDE

AVE

PRITCHARD AVE

33 ST

PORTLAND STGL

ENDONWYNNE RD

OLD MILL RD

37 ST

PRINCESS ANNECRES

HARJO

LYN DR

SHAV

ER AV

E N

GREAT OAK DR

CLAYMORE DR

DANIELS ST

ADVANCE RDSIX POINT RD

QUEEN

S AVE

HIGH P

ARK A

VE

BERNICE C RE S

24 ST

ORRELL AVE

BYWOOD DR

ATHOL AVE

RINGLEY AVE

CHAR

TWELL

RD

CARSO

N ST

EDGECROFT RD

ABILENE DR

ELLINS AVE

14 ST

FOXWELL ST

WATSO

N AVE

32 ST

35 ST

LOMA

RD

JAMES ST

LELAND AVE

OLD OAK RD

FIELDWAY RD

LAVINI

A AVE

GRAY

AVE

CHAR

LESTO

N RD

SMITH

WOOD

DR

22 ST

CORBETT AVE

ASH CRES

NORDIN AVE

HILLCR

OFT D

R

VELMADR

LUNN

ESS RD

LESMAR DR

FAIRFIELD AVE

TOWNS R D

CRON

IN DR

BLAKE

TON R

DHEDGES BLVD

PREN

NAN A

VE

CE NTRE RD

RIVERCOVED R

RABB

IT LA

NE

ALGOMA ST

POP LA

RA V

E

CHAUNCEY AVE

GEOR

GE ST

WHEAT

FIELD

RD

MEDU

LLA AV

E

PRINC

ETON R

D

HALLM

ARK A

VEALD

ERBR

AE AV

E DELTA

STWA

RWOO

D RD

BELLM

AN AV

E

YORKVIEW DR

ARCHE R HILL D

R

20 ST

19 ST

21 ST

CASTLEBAR RD

BERE

SFORD

AVE

BELVIA

RD

KNOLLDR

ELMA ST

HEMAN STALBANI ST

MURRIE ST

WOOLNER AVE

MABE L LE AVE

TERRY DR

TITAN RD

PHEASANT LANE

27 ST


MU

NSTER AVE

ISLING

TON A

VE

HORNER AVE

SCARLETT RD

BROW

NSL IN

E

WILM

AR RD

MARINE PARAD

E DR

WESTRO

SEAVE

VANS

CO RD

FAIRV

IEW AV

E

SYM

ES RD

L AMBETH RD

WESTON RD

KINGS

WAY CR ES

THE KINGSWAY

ELLIS AVE

6 ST

C OLBO

RNE L

ODGE

DR

GLEN AGAR DR

7 ST

HALIB

URTO

N AVE

THEE

ASTM

ALL

H IGH W

AY427

JANE S

T

CLEND

ENAN

AVE

ALDER

CREST

RD

ROCK

CLIFFE

BLVD

GILMO

UR AV

E

HIGH S

T

RIVERSIDE DR

30 ST

VIELLA ST

PRINC

EEDW

ARD D

R N

UNO D

R

RIVERW OODPK Y

38 ST

CONEY RD

MART

IN GR

OVE R

D

HIGH PARKTRAIL

ANTIOCH DR

EVELY

NAV E

BETA

ST

LAWSS

T

MONK

TON A

VE

DURIE

ST

LOTH

IAN AV

E

RIMILTON AVE

SILVE

RHILL

DR

KENN

EDY

AVE

LAURE

L AVE

SHAV

ER AV

E S

BONNYVIEWDR

39 ST

26 ST

ROYALAV ON CRES

MEAD

OWBA

NK RD

RAVEN SCREST DR

SHOR

NCLIF

FE RD

OURLA

ND AV

E

ASHB

OURN

E DR

31ST

WEST

RD

ED GEHIL

L RD

CY NTHIA RD

BURR

OWS

AVE

BABY POINT CRE S

DUNE

DIN DR

BOTFI

ELD AV

E

EVELYN CRES

NORT

H CAR

SON S

T

STATIO

N RD

AGAR CRES

CULN

AN AV

E

GAMM

A ST

LAPP ST

TOR LA

KE CRES

ATOMI

C AVE

DEER PEN RD

VICKER

S RD

VALECREST

D R

Park LawnCemetary

St. GeorgeGolf and

Country Club

IslingtonGolf Club

King'sMill Park

HUMBER RIVER

H UMB ER RIVER TR I B

BLACK CREEK

MIMICOCREEK

ChristTheKing

St. Teresa

St. Leo

Holy Angels

St. Elizabeth

St. Mark

Our Ladyof Peace

Our Ladyof Sorrows

St. Pius X

JosyfCardinalSlipyj

St. Gregory


St. James

SantaMaria

Our Lady of Victory

St. Louis

Scenario 2 - Consolidation of St. Louis into St. Leo

¯

0 21 Km

TCDSB Planning Services April 2015

North: South lot line St George's Golf and Country Club, HumberRiverEast: Humber RiverSouth: From the Canadian Pacific Railway to Six Point Rd, Islington Ave, Through Fairfield Park, Leland Ave, Royal York Rd, Glenroy Ave, Prince Edward Dr S, South lot linePark Lawn Cemetery & King's Mill ParkWest: Islington Ave, Orrell Ave, West lot line of 1416 Islington Ave, Through lot 1412 Islington Ave, North lot line of 1410 Islington Ave, East lot line of Islington Golf Club, Dundas St W,Between lots 5359 & 5365 Dundas St W, Canadian Pacific Railway

North: From the Canadian Pacific Railway to Six Point Rd, Islington Ave, Through Fairfield Park, Leland AveEast: Mimico Creek, Mimico Creek Trail, Berry Rd, Royal YorkRd South: Gardiner ExpresswayWest: Canadian Pacific Railway

North: Gardiner Expressway, Royal York Rd, Berry Rd, MimicoCreek TrailEast: Mimico CreekSouth: Toronto shorelineWest: Islington Ave, Canadian Pacific Railway, South through Railyard, Drummond St, Dwight Ave, Lakeshore Blvd W, Sand Beach Rd, Nautical Lane

Consolidated with St. Leo North: Glenroy Ave, Prince Edward Dr S, South lot line of ParkLawn Cemetary & King's Mill ParkEast: Humber RiverSouth: Toronto shorelineWest: Royal York Rd, Mimico Creek




RailwayStreets

ParksWater & Rivers



DRUMMOND STCANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY


BERRY RD

ISLIN

GTON

AVE

ISLING

TONA

VE

CANA

DIANP

ACI FIC

RAILW

AY

ROYA

L YOR

KRD

GLENROY AVE



DUNDAS ST W

MIMICO CREEK TRAIL

ROYA

L YOR

KRD

Consolidation of St. Louis into St. Leo and Holy Angels & Our Lady of Sorrows Boundary Change




After Boundary Change: Pupil Count 763 762 735 725 706 702 685 662 653 637 675 679 712

After Boundary Change: Rate of

Utilization (%)141% 140% 136% 134% 130% 130% 126% 122% 121% 118% 125% 125% 131%

St. Mark OTG 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027



No Boundary Change: Pupil Count 225 234 252 275 291 303 303 313 316 316 321 327 332

No Boundary Change: Rate of Utilization

(%)85% 88% 95% 103% 109% 114% 114% 117% 119% 119% 121% 123% 125%

Holy Angels OTG 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027





Utilization (%)121% 134% 145% 153% 160% 165% 172% 177% 181% 182% 178% 173% 169%

St. Louis OTG 2014 2015 2016 *2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027




After Consolidation: Rate of Utilization

(%)58% 54% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

St. Leo OTG 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027





Utilization (%)56% 62% 105% 105% 105% 103% 104% 107% 107% 106% 105% 105% 105%

*Note: Consolidation of St. Louis into St. Leo and Holy Angel is recommended for the 2017‐18 school year.

³E³E

³E

³E

³E

³E³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E³E

³E

³E³E

³E³E

³E

³E³E

³E

³E

³E³E

³E³E

³E

³E

³E³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³X

GLENLAKE AVE

STOCK

AVE

ELSFIE

LD RD

DWIGH

T AVE

GOVERNMENT RD

LAK E SHORE BLVD W

JUDSON ST


DUNDAS ST W

GARDINER EXPY

RUNN

YMED

E RD

PRINC

E EDW

ARD D

R S

KIPLIN

G AVE

STEPH

EN DR

SOUTH KINGSWAY

LYNNGROVE AVE

SIMPSON AVE

ASTORIA AVE

BERING AVE

BLAC K CREEK BLVD

MARIA ST

ARMA

DALE

AVE

23 ST

NEW TORONTO ST

VARSITY RD

EVANS AVE

THORNCREST RD

SWA N AVE

ROYA

L YOR

K RD

KING GEORGES RD

RATHBURN RD

WIMBLETON RD

E L LISPAR

K RD

NORSEMAN ST

NORTHDR

EAST DR

THE QUEENSWAY

25 ST

PARK

LAWN

RD

QUEB

EC AV

E

HENRIETTA ST

8 ST

RYDING AVE

BADGER DR

JASPER AVE

9 ST

BALLA

CAINE

DR

SPEAR

S ST

2 ST

BLOOR ST W

MANITOBA ST

BLACK CREEK TR AIL

CAYUGA AVE

PRINCE GEORGE DR

HAY AVE

13 ST

LANOR AVE

CORD ELLAAVE

ST MARKS RD

ANGLESEY BLVD

HILLD

ALE R

D

EILEEN AVE

ROBINGLADE DR

NEWCASTLE ST

VAN DUSEN BLVD

ST CLAIR AVE W

36 ST

BIRMINGHAM ST

MIMICOCREEK TRAIL


16 ST

17 ST

DELROY DR

15 ST

4 ST

WESLE

Y ST

PAUL

ART D

R

SUNNYLEA AVE E

RIVERCRES T R D

HUMBERVIEW RD

WILLA

RD AV

E

LAKE CRES

3 ST

MELROSE ST

SAYBROOK AVE

EAGL

E RD OLDMILL DR

CAVELL AVE

ED EN BROOK HIL L

BEAVERBROOK AVE

FIR WOOD CRES

BROO

KSIDE

AVE

PRITCHARD AVE

33 ST

PORTLAND STGL

ENDONWYNNE RD

OLD MILL RD

37 ST

PRINCESS ANNECRES

HARJO

LYN DR

SHAV

ER AV

E N

GREAT OAK DR

CLAYMORE DR

DANIELS ST

ADVANCE RDSIX POINT RD

QUEEN

S AVE

HIGH P

ARK A

VE

BERNICE C RE S

24 ST

ORRELL AVE

BYWOOD DR

ATHOL AVE

RINGLEY AVE

CHAR

TWELL

RD

CARSO

N ST

EDGECROFT RD

ABILENE DR

ELLINS AVE

14 ST

FOXWELL ST

WATSO

N AVE

32 ST

35 ST

LOMA

RD

JAMES ST

LELAND AVE

OLD OAK RD

FIELDWAY RD

LAVINI

A AVE

GRAY

AVE

CHAR

LESTO

N RD

SMITH

WOOD

DR

22 ST

CORBETT AVE

ASH CRES

NORDIN AVE

HILLCR

OFT D

R

VELMADR

LUNN

ESS RD

LESMAR DR

FAIRFIELD AVE

TOWNS R D

CRON

IN DR

BLAKE

TON R

DHEDGES BLVD

PREN

NAN A

VE

CE NTRE RD

RIVERCOVED R

RABB

IT LA

NE

ALGOMA ST

POP LA

RA V

E

CHAUNCEY AVE

GEOR

GE ST

WHEAT

FIELD

RD

MEDU

LLA AV

E

PRINC

ETON R

D

HALLM

ARK A

VEALD

ERBR

AE AV

E DELTA

STWA

RWOO

D RD

BELLM

AN AV

E

YORKVIEW DR

ARCHE R HILL D

R

20 ST

19 ST

21 ST

CASTLEBAR RD

BERE

SFORD

AVE

BELVIA

RD

KNOLLDR

ELMA ST

HEMAN STALBANI ST

MURRIE ST

WOOLNER AVE

MABE L LE AVE

TERRY DR

TITAN RD

PHEASANT LANE

27 ST


MU

NSTER AVE

ISLING

TON A

VE

HORNER AVE

SCARLETT RD

BROW

NSL IN

E

WILM

AR RD

MARINE PARAD

E DR

WESTRO

SEAVE

VANS

CO RD

FAIRV

IEW AV

E

SYM

ES RD

L AMBETH RD

WESTON RD

KINGS

WAY CR ES

THE KINGSWAY

ELLIS AVE

6 ST

C OLBO

RNE L

ODGE

DR

GLEN AGAR DR

7 ST

HALIB

URTO

N AVE

THEE

ASTM

ALL

H IGH W

AY427

JANE S

T

CLEND

ENAN

AVE

ALDER

CREST

RD

ROCK

CLIFFE

BLVD

GILMO

UR AV

E

HIGH S

T

RIVERSIDE DR

30 ST

VIELLA ST

PRINC

EEDW

ARD D

R N

UNO D

R

RIVERW OODPK Y

38 ST

CONEY RD

MART

IN GR

OVE R

D

HIGH PARKTRAIL

ANTIOCH DR

EVELY

NAV E

BETA

ST

LAWSS

T

MONK

TON A

VE

DURIE

ST

LOTH

IAN AV

E

RIMILTON AVE

SILVE

RHILL

DR

KENN

EDY

AVE

LAURE

L AVE

SHAV

ER AV

E S

BONNYVIEWDR

39 ST

26 ST

ROYALAV ON CRES

MEAD

OWBA

NK RD

RAVEN SCREST DR

SHOR

NCLIF

FE RD

OURLA

ND AV

E

ASHB

OURN

E DR

31ST

WEST

RD

ED GEHIL

L RD

CY NTHIA RD

BURR

OWS

AVE

BABY POINT CRE S

DUNE

DIN DR

BOTFI

ELD AV

E

EVELYN CRES

NORT

H CAR

SON S

T

STATIO

N RD

AGAR CRES

CULN

AN AV

E

GAMM

A ST

LAPP ST

TOR LA

KE CRES

ATOMI

C AVE

DEER PEN RD

VICKER

S RD

VALECREST

D R

Park LawnCemetary

St. GeorgeGolf and

Country Club

IslingtonGolf Club

King'sMill Park

HUMBER RIVER

H UMB ER RIVER TR I B

BLACK CREEK

MIMICOCREEK

ChristTheKing

St. Teresa

St. Leo

Holy Angels

St. Elizabeth

St. Mark

Our Ladyof Peace

Our Ladyof Sorrows

St. Pius X

JosyfCardinalSlipyj

St. Gregory


St. James

SantaMaria

Our Lady of Victory

St. Louis

Scenario 3¯

0 21 Km

TCDSB Planning ServicesMarch 2015

North: South lot line St George's Golf and Country Club, HumberRiverEast: Humber RiverSouth: Through Fairfield Park, Leland Ave, Royal York Rd, Glenroy Ave, Prince Edward Dr S, South lot linePark Lawn Cemetery & King's Mill ParkWest: Islington Ave, Orrell Ave, West lot line of 1416 Islington Ave, Through lot 1412 Islington Ave, North lot line of 1410 Islington Ave, East lot line of Islington Golf Club, Islington Ave

North: Dundas St W, Islington Ave, Through Fairfield Park, Leland Ave East: Mimico Creek, Mimico Creek Trail, Berry Rd, Royal York RdSouth: Gardiner ExpresswayWest: Between lots 5359 & 5365 Dundas St W, Canadian Pacific Railway, Through railyard to Canadian Pacific Railway

North: Gardiner ExpresswayEast: Mimico CreekSouth: Toronto shorelineWest: Islington Ave, Canadian Pacific Railway, South through Railyard, Drummond St, Dwight Ave, Lakeshore Blvd W, Sand Beach Rd, Nautical Lane

Consolidated with St. Leo and Holy Angels North: Glenroy Ave, Prince Edward Dr S, South lot line of ParkLawn Cemetary & King's Mill ParkEast: Humber RiverSouth: Toronto shorelineWest: Royal York Rd, Mimico Creek




RailwayStreets

ParksWater & Rivers



DRUMMOND STCANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY


ISLIN

GTON

AVE

ISLING

TONA

VE

CANA

DIANP

ACI FIC

RAILW

AY

ROYA

L YOR

KRD

GLENROY AVE



DUNDAS ST W

Expansion of St. Louis Boundary






Utilization (%)141% 140% 136% 134% 130% 130% 126% 122% 121% 118% 125% 125% 131%

ST MARK OTG 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027



After Boundary Change: Pupil Count 199 225 234 252 275 291 303 303 313 316 316 321 327 332


Utilization (%)1 85% 88% 95% 103% 109% 114% 114% 117% 119% 119% 121% 123% 125%

HOLY ANGELS OTG 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027





Utilization (%)1 117% 126% 133% 137% 139% 141% 144% 144% 145% 142% 137% 133% 129%

ST LOUIS OTG 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027





Utilization (%)1 66% 70% 75% 76% 78% 78% 82% 85% 88% 90% 89% 89% 88%

ST LEO OTG 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027





Utilization (%)1 53% 56% 56% 59% 61% 62% 63% 67% 68% 68% 68% 69% 69%

³E³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E³E

³E³E ³E

³E

³E³E

³E

³E

³E³E

³E³E

³E

³E

³E³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

³E

HYDRO CORRIDOR

GLENLAKE AVE

STOCK

AVE

ELSFIE

LD RD

DWIGH

T AVE

GOVERNMENT RD

LAKE SHORE BLVD W

JUDSON ST


DUNDAS ST W

GARDINER EXPY

RUNN

YMED

E RD

PRINC

E EDW

ARD D

R S

KIPLIN

G AVE

STEPH

EN DR

SOUTH KINGSWAY

LYNNGROVE AVE

SIMPSON AVE

ASTORIA AVE

BERING AVE

BLAC K CREEK BLVD

MARIA ST

ARMA

DALE

AVE

23 ST

NEW TORONTO ST

VARSITY RD

EVANS AVE

THORNCREST RD

SWA N AVE

ROYA

L YOR

K RD

KING GEORGES RD

RATHBURN RD

WIMBLETON RD

E L LISPAR

K RD

NORSEMAN ST

NORTHDR

EAST DR

THE QUEENSWAY

25 ST

PARK

LAWN

RD

QUEB

EC AV

E

HENRIETTA ST

8 ST

RYDING AVE

BADGER DR

JASPER AVE

9 ST

BALLA

CAINE

DR

SPEAR

S ST

2 ST

BLOOR ST W

MANITOBA ST

BLACK CREEK TR AIL

CAYUGA AVE

PRINCE GEORGE DR

HAY AVE

13 ST

LANOR AVE

GRAN

D AVE

CORD ELLAAVE

ST MARKS RD

ANGLESEY BLVD

JUDGE

RD

HILLD

ALE R

D

EILEEN AVE

ROBINGLADE DR

NEWCASTLE ST

OXFORD ST

VAN DUSEN BLVD

ST CLAIR AVE W

36 ST

BIRMINGHAM ST

MIMICOCREEK TRAIL


16 ST

17 ST

DELROY DR

15 ST

4 ST

WESLE

Y ST

PAUL

ART D

R

SUNNYLEA AVE E

RIVERCREST R D

HUMBERVIEW RD

WILLA

RD AV

E

LAKE CRES

3 ST

MELROSE ST

SAYBROOK AVE

EAGL

E RD OLD MILL DR

CAVELL AVE

EDEN BROOKH ILL

BEAVERBROOK AVE

FIR WOOD CRES

BROO

KSIDE

AVE

PRITCHARD AVE

33 ST

PORTLAND STGL

E NDONWYNNE RD

OLD MILL RD

37 ST

PRINCESS ANNECRES

HARJO

LYN DR

SHAV

ER AV

E N

GREAT OAK DR

CLAYMORE DR

DANIELS ST

ADVANCE RD

GREN

VIEW

BLVD SSIX POINT RD

QUEEN

S AVE

HIGH P

ARK A

VE

BERNICE CRE S

24 ST

ORRELL AVE

BYWOOD DR

ATHOL AVE

RINGLEY AVE

CARSO

N ST

EDGECROFT RD

ABILENE DR

ELLINS AVE

14 ST

FOXWELL ST

WATSO

N AVE

32 ST

35 ST

LOMA

RD

JAMES ST

LELAND AVE

OLD OAK RD

FIELDWAY RD

LAVINI

A AVE

GRAY

AVE

CHAR

LESTO

N RD

SMITH

WOOD

DR

22 ST

CORBETT AVE

ASH CRES

NORDIN AVE

HILLCR

OFT D

R

LUNN

ESS RD

LESMAR DR

FAIRFIELD AVE

TOWNS R D

CRON

IN DR

BLAKE

TON R

DHEDGES BLVD

PREN

NAN A

VE

CE NTRE RD

RIVERCOVE D R

RABB

IT LA

NE

ALGOMA ST

POPL A

RAV

E

CHAUNCEY AVE

GEOR

GE ST

WHEAT

FIELD

RD

MEDU

LLA AV

E

PRINC

ETON R

D

HALLM

ARK A

VEALD

ERBR

AE AV

E DELTA

STWA

RWOO

D RD

BELLM

AN AV

E

CHARTWELL RD

ARCHE R HILLD

R

20 ST

19 ST

21 ST

BERE

SFORD

AVE

BELVIA

RD

KNOLLDR

ELMA ST

HEMAN STALBANI ST

MURRIE ST

WOOLNER AVE

MABE L LE AVE

TERRY DR

TITAN RD

PHEASANT LANE

27 ST


MU

NSTER AVE

ISLING

TON A

VE

HORNER AVE

SCAR LETT RD

B ROW

NSLI N

E

WILM

AR RD

MARINE PARAD

EDR

WESTRO

SEAVE

VANS

CO RD

FAIRV

IEW AV

E

SYM

ES RD

L AMBETH RD

WESTON RD

KINGS

WAY CR ES

THE KINGSWAY

ELLIS AVE

6 ST

COLBO

RNE L

ODGE

DR

GLENAGAR DR

7 ST

HALIB

URTO

N AVE

THEE

ASTM

ALL

HI GH W

AY427

JANE S

T

CLEND

ENAN

AVE

ALDER

CREST

RD

ROCK

CLIFFE

BLVD

GILMO

UR AV

E

HIGH S

T

RIVERSIDE DR

30 ST

VIELLA ST

PRINC

EEDW

ARDD

R N

RIVERWOODPK Y

38 ST

MART

IN GR

OVE R

D

HIGH PARKTRAIL

ANTIOCH DR

EVELY

NAVE

BETA

ST

LAWS S

T

MONK

TON A

VE

DURIE

ST

LOTH

IAN AV

E

RIMILTON AVE

SILVE

RHILL

DR

K ENN

E DY

AVE

LAURE

L AVE

SHAV

ER AV

E S

BONNYVIEWDR

39 ST

26 ST

ROYALAV ON CRES

MEAD

OWBA

NK RD

RAVEN SCREST DR

SHOR

NCLIF

FE RD

OURLA

ND AV

E

ASHB

OURN

E DR

31ST

WEST

RD

ED GEHIL

L RD

CY NTHIA RD

BURR

OWS

AVE

BABY POINT CRE S

DUNE

DIN DR

BOTFI

ELD AV

E

EVELYN CRES

NORT

H CAR

SON S

T

STATIO

N RD

AGAR CRES

CULN

AN AV

E

GAMM

A ST

LAPP ST

TOR LA

KE CRES

ATOMI

C AVE

DEER PEN RD

VICKER

S RD

VALECREST

D R

Park LawnCemetary

St. GeorgeGolf and

Country Club

IslingtonGolf Club

King'sMill Park

HUMBER RIVER

HUMB ER RIVER TR I B

BLACK CREEK

MIMICOCREEK

ChristTheKing

St. Teresa

St. Leo

St. Louis

Holy Angels

St. Elizabeth

St. Mark

Our Ladyof Peace

Our Ladyof Sorrows

St. Pius X

JosyfCardinalSlipyj

St.Gregory


St. James

SantaMaria

Our Lady of VictoryScenario 4 - St. Louis & Holy Angels Gain

¯

0 21 Km

TCDSB Planning ServicesApril 2015

North: South lot line St George's Golf and Country Club, HumberRiverEast: Humber RiverSouth: Through Fairfield Park, Leland Ave, Royal York Rd, Glenroy Ave, Prince Edward Dr S, South lot linePark Lawn Cemetery & King's Mill ParkWest: Islington Ave, Orrell Ave, West lot line of 1416 Islington Ave, Through lot 1412 Islington Ave, North lot line of 1410 Islington Ave, East lot line of Islington Golf Club, Islington Ave

North: Dundas St W, Islington Ave, Through Fairfield Park, Leland AveEast: Mimico CreekSouth: Gardiner Expressway, Islington Ave, Through HydroCorridor, Royal York Rd, Berry Rd, Mimico Creek TrailWest: Between lots 5359 & 5365 Dundas St W, Canadian Pacific Railway, Through railyard to Canadian Pacific Railway

North: Canadian Pacific RailwayEast: Mimico CreekSouth: Toronto shorelineWest: South through Railyard, Drummond St, Dwight Ave, Lakeshore Blvd W, Sand Beach Rd, Nautical Lane

North: Through Hydro Corridor, Royal York Rd, Berry Rd, Mimico Creek TrailEast: Mimico CreekSouth: Canadian Pacific RailwayWest: Islington Ave

North: Glenroy Ave, Prince Edward Dr S, South lot line of ParkLawn Cemetary & King's Mill ParkEast: Humber RiverSouth: Toronto shorelineWest: Royal York Rd, Mimico Creek




RailwayStreets

ParksWater & Rivers



DRUMMOND ST

CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY


ROYA

L YOR

KRD

BERRY RD

ISLIN

GTON

AVE

ISLING

TONA

VE

CANA

DIANP

ACI FIC

RAILW

AY

ROYA

L YOR

KRD

GLENROY AVE



DUNDAS ST W

MIMICO CREEK TRAIL

school accommodation review holy angels, our lady of

Documents