pigment pattern formation in the medaka embryo
TRANSCRIPT
Pigment pattern formation in the medaka embryo
M. Lynn Lamoreux1,*, Robert N. Kelsh2,
Yuko Wakamatsu3 and Kenjiro Ozato3
12 Comparative Medicine Program, Texas A&M University, College
Station, TX, USA2Department of Biology and Biochemistry, Centre for Regenerative
Medicine, Developmental Biology Programme, University of Bath,
Bath, UK3Nagoya University, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Japan
*Address correspondence to M. Lynn Lamoreux,
e-mail: [email protected]
Summary
For the study of development of pigmentation,
compared with mammalian models, fish offer the
advantage of multiple chromatophore types and
ready access to the developing embryo for observa-
tion and experimental manipulation. Compared with
zebrafish embryos, medaka embryos have an addi-
tional unique chromatophore-type and superb prop-
erties for conditional mutation studies. The rich
resources of medaka mutants, combined with data
obtainable from other species, potentially offer
information not otherwise readily available regard-
ing chromatophore lineage. Here we summarize the
embryonic development of normal medaka pigment
pattern, based on observations using embryos of a
panel of wild type and mutant fish. A more detailed
description of development is available in the
appendix of the on-line version of this paper (see
Supplementary Material). We make some compari-
sons with zebrafish development to emphasize the
increased power of both systems when utilized
together. These two models will, in combination, be
a powerful system for studies of the embryogenesis
and evolution of pigmentation.
Key words: medaka/pigmentation/neural crest develop-
ment/chromatophores
Received 26 June 2004, revised and accepted for publi-
cation 7 November 2004
Introduction
The development of pigmentation, both ontogenic and
phylogenic, informs our understanding of embryogene-
sis in general and neural crest patterning in particular.
The origin of pigment cells from the neural crest
is amenable to research using a wide variety of well
established techniques; most mutations that impact pig-
mentation are visible and nonlethal; and many pigment
mutants are well characterized at the molecular level in
several species. Pigment cells also are the defective
element of several medical conditions involving their dif-
ferentiation, survival and replication. Examples include
melanoma, albinism, piebaldism (white spotting) and
vitiligo. And of course pigmentation is of cosmetic signi-
ficance.
Compared with mammals, study of pigmentation in
fish offers additional benefits. The most obvious is the
availability of all embryonic stages. Furthermore, fish
have multiple pigment cell types, whereas mammals
produce only melanocytes, and fish are easier and less
expensive to maintain. The domesticated fish models, of
course, avoid problems faced in working with mammals
or species that must be collected in the wild. The exist-
ence of two well characterized and easily managed fish
models, zebrafish and medaka, increases the potential
value of both model species for the evaluation, compar-
atively, of genetic control over phenotypic development.
The Japanese medaka offers particular advantages to
pigment cell research, both in itself and in comparison
with other species such as zebrafish (Furutani-Seiki and
Wittbrodt, 2004). At the same time, medaka uniquely
satisfies some specific needs for biological research.
This hardy little fish produces a dozen or more eggs at
a predictable time each day, and it retains them
attached to the female for several hours. Thus collection
is convenient and staging (Iwamatsu, 2004) simplified.
Medaka are easy and inexpensive to raise and to trans-
port. They are tolerant of wide ranges of temperature
and salinity. The embryonic chorion can be removed
manually or using hatching enzyme (Wakamatsu, 1997;
Medaka Web Site http://biol1.bio.nagoya-u.ac.jp:8000/
Welcome.html) for observation without interfering with
development. Viable technologies include cell culture
(Hong et al., 1996, 1998; Wakamatsu et al., 1993,
1994), cryopreservation (Strussman et al., 1999), nuclear
transfer (Ando and Wakamatsu, 1995; Niwa et al., 2000;
Wakamatsu et al., 2001a), cloning (Naruse et al., 1985)
and production of transgenics (Ozato et al., 1992). Many
natural mutants are available (Medaka Web Site http://
biol1.bio.nagoya-u.ac.jp:8000/Welcome.html, Kelsh et al.,
2004; Yamamoto, 1975).
Also available are mutagenesis (Fukamachi et al.,
2001), established molecular technologies (Matsumoto
et al., 1996) and a rapidly developing gene map
(Naruse et al., 2000, 2004a,b; Medaka EST database,
Copyright ª Blackwell Munksgaard 2005 Reviewdoi: 10.1111/j.1600-0749.2005.00216.x
64 Pigment Cell Res. 18; 64–73
http://medaka.lab.nig.ac.jp/; Medaka Genome Project
http://dolphin.lab.nig.ac.jp/medaka/; Medaka Genome Ini-
tiative http://medaka.dsp.jst.go.jp/MGI/; Medaka Expres-
sion Pattern Database http://www.embl-heidelberg.de/
mepd/; Medaka Developmental Mutants Group http://
medaka.dsp.jst.go.jp/DMG/). Finally, the completion of a
large-scale mutagenesis screen has further boosted the
genetic resources for this model, although sadly pig-
mentation was not a target of the screens (Furutani-
Seiki et al., 2004b). Thus medaka are suitable for
research projects at all levels from the classroom to the
sophisticated research laboratory (Ishikawa, 2000;
Iwamatsu, 1997; Kirchen and West3 , Carolina Biological;
Ozato and Wakamatsu, 1994; Packer, 2001). Here we
summarize the larval pigment pattern and its develop-
ment, as observed using wild-type and selected pig-
ment mutant stocks (listed in Table 1), and provide a
detailed description in the appendix of the online version
of this paper (see Supplementary Material). Materials
and methods are also presented in more detail in
Appendix A. This description supplements the excellent
general staging series of Iwamatsu (2004). We also
highlight some comparisons between pigment pattern
formation in medaka and zebrafish to enable more ready
appreciation of the value of these superb models.
Chromatophores
Presence or absence of chromatophores or pigment of
any of the four distinct types (and some subtypes) is
under tight genetic control. The mature embryonic wild
type pattern is shown in Figure 1. Critical evaluation of
the chromatophore types is possible because of the
availability of a panel of medaka mutants (Table 1) that
permit observation of each chromatophore type in
absence of the obscuring pigmentation of other chroma-
tophore types, or in various ‘made to order’ combina-
tions. Some explanation of the history of medaka
nomenclature may be helpful, and is provided in Appen-
dix A of the online version of this paper (see Supple-
mentary Material).
In the adult, the four types of medaka chromatoph-
ores are found in the scales and also beneath the
scales, as well as in the peritoneum, in the eyes and
around the brain and spinal column (Bagnara, 1998;
Bagnara and Hadley, 1973; Hama, 1975; Hama et al.,
1965; Inagaki et al., 1994; Menter et al., 1979; Obika
and Fukuzawa, 1993; Takeuchi, 1975, 1982). In general
the pigment in these chromatophores is contained
within membranous organelles, though the carotenoid
vesicles of xanthophores apparently lack membranous
envelopes (Obika, 1996). Three of the medaka chromat-
ophores – melanophores, xanthophores and iridophores
– appear to be similar to those of zebrafish. The fourth,
leucophores, have not been reported in zebrafish
embryos, although a few similar cells are seen in adult
tail (Johnson et al., 19954 ).
Melanophores are grey or black in colour and contain
melanin (Hishida et al., 1961; Ide and Hama, 1969;
Nakajima and Obika, 1986; Tomita and Hishida,
1961a,b). Because melanophores obscure developmen-
tal events in embryos and adults, the ‘albino’ (i-3/i-3)
and/or b/b fish that lack pigmented melanophores are
helpful for observing the other three types of chromat-
ophores during development (Figures 2 and 3).
Xanthophores are yellow or orange and contain pteri-
dine pigments and carotenes (Hama and Hasegawa,
1967; Hirao et al., 1969; Ide and Hama, 1969; Kamai-
Takeuchi and Hama, 19715 ; Obika, 1993; Takeuchi,
1960, 1961, 1968). The pteridines include principally
Table 1. Mutant medaka stocks (Kimmel
et al., 1995). The genotypes of fish that
were used to evaluate the development of
the four types of chromatophore in
presence or absence of differentiated
chromatophores of the other types. A plus
symbol (+) indicates that the fish of this
stock are homozygous for the wild-type
normal allele at the gene locus shown
above the symbol. A minus symbol ())indicates the gene locus is homozygous
for the mutant allele. Many other medaka
mutations have been identified that
influence pigmentation
Stock symbol Name of Mutant Stock
Genotype
Lf I-3 Gu Il-1 R B
‘wild type’ + + + + + +
lf ‘Leucophoreless’ stock ) + + + + +
i-3 ‘albino-3’ stock + ) + + + )gu ‘guanine-free’ stock + + ) + + )il-1 ‘iridophore-less’ stock + + + ) + +
STI ‘See Through I’ + ) ) + + +
STII ‘See Through II’ ) ) ) + + +
STII.YB Males + ) ) + + +
Females ) ) ) + + +
STIII ‘See Through III’ ) ) ) ) + +
FLFII* ‘Female Leucophore-free’
Males leucophore positive + + + + + )Females leucophore free ) + + + ) )
F2 (FLFII · STIII) All loci segregating
HO5 Inbred ‘orange-red’ or ‘golden’ + + + + + )White ‘white’ stock + + + + ) )
VASA stock ) + ) + + )
*Medaka web site http://biol1.bio.nagoya-u.ac.jp:8000/Welcome.html.
Pigment pattern formation1
Pigment Cell Res. 18; 64–73 65
sepiapterin, as is also the case with zebrafish xanthoph-
ores (Kamei-Takeuchi et al., 1968; Ziegler, 2003). Homo-
zygosity for the recessive allele at the R locus results in
dramatic reduction in numbers of xanthophores or in
their pigmentation (Figures 2 and 3).
Iridophores (also referred to in the literature as
guanophores) produce iridescent effects as a result of
their reflecting platelets or precisely aligned crystals of
purines, guanine, hypoxanthine and in some cases aden-
ine (Kawaguti and Takeuchi, 1968; Menter et al., 1979;
Ziegler, 2003) (Figure 3).
Leucophores are cream or whitish in colour. With inci-
dent lighting they lack the iridescence of iridophores.
Similar to xanthophores, they contain pteridine deriva-
tives, primarily drosopterinosomes (Hama, 19706 ; Seiji
et al., 1963). Several mutant loci differentially impact
leucophore phenotype (Table 2) and their study would
surely be rewarding. Within this study, all the fish
stocks that lack differentiated leucophores are of the
genotype lf/lf (Tomita, 1992; Wada et al., 1998). Medaka
of the genotype lf/lf (‘leucophore free’) completely lack
differentiated leucophores (Figures 2 and 3) (Tomita,
1992; Wada et al., 1995). The lf gene has no effect on
the pigmentation of melanophores and xanthophores,
Figure 1. (A) Wild type medaka at hatching, around 10 dpf. (B)
Wild type medaka at 13 dpf. This figure illustrates the major
features of pigmentation at hatching and just after hatching. Note
the normal distribution of the leucophores (yellow to cream
coloured) that are characteristically surrounded by black
melanophores in the dorsal and ventral stripes and elsewhere in
the embryo are independent of melanophores. Embryonic
melanophores form a dorsal stripe posterior to the head and a
ventral stripe posterior to the anus. The golden sheen of the eyes
results from xanthophores that overlie iridophores. Beneath the
xanthophores and iridophores the eyes are melanized. Similarly, the
peritoneum will be covered with black melanophores that are
overlain by reflective iridophores, and these to some extent by
golden xanthophores. In this picture the xanthophores are evident
only in the golden reflections on the eyes. See Figures 2 and 3 for
xanthophores. Other cream-coloured cells are leucophores.
Figure 2. Two littermate fish of the ST-II.YB stock at 10 dpf. Both
are ‘albino’ in phenotype (genotype i-3/i-3), thus lack all
differentiated melanophores in skin and eyes, making it easier to
evaluate the other chromatophore types. The above fish also lacks
leucophores at all locations because of lf/lf genotype and is
deficient in xanthophore pigmentation due to its r/r genotype.
Figure 3. Two fish of hatching age. These fish are from a large
backcross mating that segregated at i-3, lf, gu, il-1 and r. Both
littermate fish in the figure lack melanin because of mutation at i-3.
The lower fish is r/r Gu/+lf/lf i-3/i-3. Iridescence of eyes and lateral
patches are evident; the eyes and lateral patches appear silvery
rather than gold because of the reduction in xanthophore
pigmentation overlying the iridophores. The above fish is deficient
in iridophore pigmentation because of its gu/gu genotye, but it
does have normal representation of xanthophores and leukophores.
Its genotype is R/-gu/gu Lf/-i-3/i-3.
Lamoreux et al.
66 Pigment Cell Res. 18; 64–73
nor on the physiological or morphological colour chan-
ges of chromatophores (Tomita, page 265 in Hama,
1975; Obika, 1988).
Embryonic development of medakapigmentation
The life cycle of the medaka begins with a clutch of one
or two dozen eggs that are produced each morning
within about an hour of first light. For several hours, the
eggs remain attached by a sticky substance to the
female, after which they normally drop from the female
and develop in the bottom of the tank or pond. The
embryos then proceed with their development within
the chorion for the first 9 d, when they hatch out as lar-
vae. Development of the embryonic pigment pattern
progresses smoothly to its completion at about 9 d
postfertilization (dpf) at 26�C (Figure 1). At this stage
some aspects of the larval pattern are beginning to
form. By 9 dpf in wild type fish, the eyes are black with
melanin under the iridophores and xanthophores, and all
four chromatophore types are present in an intricate
and consistent pattern on the body. We evaluated this
early embryonic pattern of pigmentation, and its devel-
opment, using wild type fish and mutations that ablate
one or more of the pigment cell types (Table 1). An
overview is presented below; the detailed description is
available Appendix B of the online version of this paper
(see Supplementary Material ).
The most obvious difference between the medaka
embryonic pigmentation, and that of the better-known
zebrafish, with which we made some comparisons, is
the essential absence of leucophores from the latter
and their prominent participation in medaka pigmenta-
tion. This difference notwithstanding, the pigment pat-
tern of medaka embryonic development is very similar
Table 2. A list of phenotypes resulting from medaka mutations that affect the leucophores*
Categories of defect Mutant stock/gene
Early differentiation of leucophores at brain ci, dp-2, rs-2, vc, Va
Early appearance on the body ci, dp-2, rs-2, vc
Brain-associated leucophore numbers high ci, dp2, ml3, rs2, vc, Va
Brain-associated leucophore fewer than normal lf, lf-2
lf-2 is very interesting comparator to lf. lf completely lacks differentiated leucophores.
lf-2 does have leucophores associated with the brain at the normal time; they fail to replicate, and eventually they disappear. Occasionally a
few make it to the outer surface of the body, supporting our assumption that the leucophores associated with the brain contribute to the
population of surface leucophores, but none survive to hatching in lf-2.
Numbers of leucophores on the body of the embryo
Normal dp-2
Ci did not have a normal body
Few or none lf, lf-2
Variable vc
High r-s2, ml-3
ml-3 has additional leucophores in the dorsal stripe pattern so that there are three parallel dorsal lines of leucophores rather than the normal
one.
Distribution of leucophores associated with the brain
Normal ci, ml-3, Va, lf
dp-2 could not tell there were too many or too poorly defined?
Rs and vc had many little differentiated leucophores fleck-looking down the neural tube, giving the impression that these may represent
migration of leucophore precursors.
Distribution of leucophores on the body
Ventral stripe abnormality ci
Variable vc
Gaps, empty locations, on the tail. dp-2
Described above lf, lf-2 and ml-3
Phenotype of leucophores associated with the brain
Normal ci, lf
Pale dp-2, Va
Small lf-2, ml-3, rs-2
Variable vc
Phenotype of leucophores on body
Normal ci, dp-2 a little off fuzzy, ml-3, lf
Absent lf-2
Small rs-2, vc, Va
Pale rs-2
*Medaka is a similarly rich genetic resource for the study of melanophores, xanthophores and iridophores. Medaka web site
http://biol1.bio.nagoya-u.ac.jp:8000/Welcome.html.32
Pigment pattern formation1
Pigment Cell Res. 18; 64–73 67
to that of zebrafish, up to about 5 d of age (Figure 5),
with dorsal stripe (DS), lateral stripe (LS) and ventral
stripe (VS) (Kimmel et al., 1995; Milos and Dingle,
1978a,b). The fourth melanophore stripe in zebrafish,
the Yolk Sac Stripe is substituted by a melanophore
cluster that we term the Yolk Sac Cluster (YSC, see
also Kelsh et al., 2004). The embryonic origin of these
stripes in medaka and zebrafish appears to be homolog-
ous, but the mechanistic basis of their patterning
remains to be determined. The most striking (and dispu-
ted) difference between the two species seems pheno-
typically to be that developing iridophores occupy the
locations in zebrafish where leucophores are found in
medaka. (M.L. Lamoreux, personal observation). We
use terminology that emphasizes observed similarities.
Pigment cells differentiate in the following sequence:
melanophores (from Stage 22; 9-somite stage; Iwama-
tsu, 2004), leucophores (from Stage 25, 20-somite
stage, very soon after appearance of otoliths), iridoph-
ores and xanthophores (from Stage 34, 5.25 dpf). The
pattern of development is under genetic control, is pre-
cise and repeatable and proceeds generally in a rostral-
caudal gradient.
Melanophores
Using a dissecting microscope the first melanophores
are seen on the yolk sac at stage 22 (8–9 somite stage).
Within 1–3 h, melanophores appear on the embryonic
body, and begin formation of the DS over the mid and
hindbrain. By stage 23 (12-somite stage) the yolk sac
melanophores are evenly dispersed as individual cells
around the whole yolk sac. On the third day the num-
bers of melanophores on the yolk sac have reached
their maximum. As the yolk sac blood vessels (Cuvierian
ducts and median yolk vein) form, melanophores rapidly
become associated with them, beginning at Stage 26
(22-somite stage) and noticeably concentrated by Stage
29 (34-somite stage). By Stage 36 (6 dpf) most of the
yolk sac melanophores are associated with blood ves-
sels. By the end of development, the yolk sac mel-
anophores have clumped together ventrally, below the
yolk, forming a YSC.
The DS melanophores, in the meantime, by Stage 23
(12-somite stage) are taking up patterned positions over
the anterior trunk regions, as well as over the mid and
hindbrain. By Stage 29 (34-somite stage), a few mel-
anophores are found in the skin dorsolateral to the fore-
brain, many are above the mid- and hindbrain (although
on the rostral hindbrain most melanophores are in fact
on the lateral faces) and a few may be over the trunk.
The net result is two lateral tracts of melanophores on
the surface of the head. The two tracts converge at the
posterior margin of the head. Posterior to the conver-
gence of the two tracts, the rather well defined double
line of melanophores seems to contain one melano-
phore unit, consisting of one to three melanophores,
per segment.
By Stage 35 (5.25 dpf) the DS melanophores begin to
form something of the final pattern and the DS extends
to almost the full length of the tail. By Stage 37 (7 dpf),
most embryos have rostral hindbrain melanophores in
the mature (medial) pattern, although a few still have
them in a mediolateral position; by Stage 38 (8 dpf), the
pattern is complete as shown in Figure 1.
In the meantime, leucophores have been developing,
having appeared at stage 25 (20-somite stage) as dis-
cussed below.
The VS is significantly advanced by Stage 23 (12-
somite stage), with melanophores scattered under the
hindbrain between and posterior to the otic vesicles. By
Stage 24 (16-somite stage) VS melanophores are at a
somewhat higher concentration just caudal to the otic
vesicle, where five to seven melanophores remain
throughout larval development but do not overlap or
intermingle with leucophores that are present more
anteriorly. Melanophores are absent from the posterior-
most hindbrain region, but a connection to the trunk
melanophores remains in the form of at least one cell
process on each side that provides contact between the
otic and trunk groups of VS melanophores and remains
through embryonic development.
By Stage 29 (34-somite stage), melanophores form a
prominent medial plexus between the otic vesicles and
extend from around the base of the pectoral fin through
the length of the trunk as a bilaterally symmetric pair of
lateral bands, but are as yet absent from the tail. At
Stage 32 (4.25 dpf), melanophores form a similar pat-
tern, but more densely populate the anterior regions.
They form dense plexi between/behind the otic vesicles
and behind the pectoral fin. If the melanophores are con-
tracted, the otic plexus can be seen to consist of seven
or eight melanophores and the trunk plexus of two paral-
lel lines of melanophores on each side of the fish in the
region that overlies the developing peritoneum, also
referred to as the developing Lateral Patches (LP). The
VS continues to develop caudad from around the base of
pectoral fins through the length of the trunk. From the
anus posteriorly the width of the band is reduced to a
bilaterally symmetric pair of ‘tramtracks’ through the
remaining length of the trunk and into the rostral tail.
At Stage 35 (5.25 dpf), melanophores in the region of
the forming LPs are concentrated laterally and are
sparse medially and they now form a broad medial band
the length of the trunk. In the tail, the bilaterally sym-
metric bands extend to the same position as the LS
melanophores, around segment 30–34. By Stage 36
(6 dpf) the pattern in the VS is essentially complete,
with bilaterally symmetric bands of melanophores
extending to near the tail tip, and with the ventral gap
visible in some embryos.
Leucophores
An interesting characteristic of leucophore development
in the embryo/larval stages is their very tight association
Lamoreux et al.
68 Pigment Cell Res. 18; 64–73
with melanophores in some locations, notably the DS,
but their isolation from melanophores at first appear-
ance, where they are associated with the hindbrain,
always anterior to the otic placodes. Using embryos that
lack melanophores, so that their development may be
visualized, leucophores are first seen as six bilaterally
symmetrical flecks, then dull white spots at Stage 25
(20-somite stage). By Stage 29 (34-somite stage) these
cells are highly stellate, cream-coloured and form a
mesh-like plexus from inside the eyes to the anterior
edge of the otic vesicles. Figure 4 shows this stage; we
selected an example in which the lecophores were con-
densed, so that they appear individually rather than as
the meshlike plexus that would be the more usual
observation. The leucophores are clearly more dorsad
than the otic plexus of melanophores and anterior to
them. As the embryo develops, this plexus becomes
yet more pronounced. The pattern of leucophore distri-
bution seems to be maintained; leucophores remain in
the original locations, while additional leucophores take
up positions as far anterior as the medial face of the
eye by Stage 33 (late 4 dpf). By Stage 33 they appear
to be migrating to the dorsal surface of the body, ini-
tially in the regions of the nose, eyes and ears, exitting
around these structures, and thence both dorsad to join
the DS over the brain, and ventrad to the LP and VS. As
the leucophores take up positions on the head, each
becomes surrounded by two or three melanophores to
form the melanophore units that are characteristic of
the DS as described above.
By late 4 dpf or early 5 dpf one to three leucophores
appear in situ in the DS, that may or may not arise sep-
arately from those described above. They are approxi-
mately evenly spaced along the antero-posterior axis of
the body, and quickly develop the more mature plump
shape and cream-yellow colour. Six or eight hours later
a second wave of leucophores appears in the DS,
evenly spaced between those first few, and each leuco-
phore becomes positioned central to three or four DS
melanophores to form melanophores units (Figure 1
shows this pattern in wild type embryos). By Stage
38 (8 dpf), embryos with the melanophores in their
contracted state, or embryos that lack melanin pigmen-
tation (Figures 2 and 3), show abundant DS leucoph-
ores, approximately one per two melanophores in the
head and a near-continuous line in the trunk and tail. As
leucophores first appear they are initially duller and whi-
ter in colour, but share the spot-like morphology; thus,
unlike the leucophores associated with the brain and
those migrating across the surface of the body, they are
rounded and lack dendrites. The association of mel-
anophores with the leucophores is precise, and is under
genetic control as illustrated by the several mutant
stocks (Table 2) in which the pattern is modified.
Iridophores
Iridophores are most readily observed in fish that lack
melanophores (Figures 2 and 3), where one or a few
can be observed at Stage 34 (5 dpf) over the eyes
and LPs. In wild type fish they are first seen scattered
over the LPs from Stage 35 (5.5 dpf). They increase in
number, seen as a fine dusting of reflecting organ-
elles, using darkfield illumination, by Stage 37 (7 dpf)
and a dense dusting by Stage 39 (9 dpf). Overlying
xanthophores impart a golden yellow tint to the LPs
by Stage 38 (8 dpf) in wild type fish, but are first
clearly visible at Stage 34 (5 dpf) using fish that lack
melanophores.
Xanthophores
Xanthophores are more easily seen after several min-
utes of exposure to transmitted light. On wild-type fish
they are first detectable under the dissecting micro-
scope at around Stage 36 (6 dpf), but using mutant
stocks can be seen as early as 4 dpf as a yellow hue
dorsal to or lateral to the fore- and midbrains and on the
LP. The yellow hue becomes gradually more prominent,
but well-defined cells can be visualized only occasionally
before 9 dpf, first being obvious adjacent to the dorsal
third of the dorsal myotomes of trunk and tail during
Stage 39 (9 dpf). Visualization of xanthophores (and
iridophore cells, as opposed to their pigmented organ-
elles) is very difficult in wild-type fish. It is helpful to
evaluate xanthophores and iridophores using fish from
the stocks that lack both melanophores and leucophores
and are segregating at R and/or gu (Figures 2 and 3).
Eye
Melanization of the pigmented retinal epithelium begins
from around Stage 28 (30-somite stage) and becomes
progressively more intense (Iwamatsu, 2004). Choroidal
melanophores are seen from Stage 26 (22-somite stage)
and increase in number and melanization up to Stage 35
(5 dpf) when the eye becomes opaque. Choroidal irid-
ophores are first seen at Stage 32 (4.25 dpf) and then
rapidly increase in number, becoming a dense spotting
by late Stage 33 (late 4 dpf) and almost a solid block by
Stage 35 (5.25 dpf), with a particular concentration
around the iris visible from this stage onwards. The
Figure 4. A medaka embryo, within the chorion, stage 29,
showing early development of leucophores associated with the
brain. This embryo is albino, from the i-3 stock, thus the
leucophores can be visualized in absence of melanophores.
Pigment pattern formation1
Pigment Cell Res. 18; 64–73 69
iridophore reflection is coloured yellow by associated
xanthophores by 5 dpf.
Discussion
Our characterization of the medaka raised a number of
questions regarding development of the four types of
chromatophores of medaka, as well as similarities and
differences of chromatophore embryogenesis compared
with zebrafish. Here we highlight four comparisons
between the phenotypes of medaka and of zebrafish
and raise a few of the questions that seem to offer rich
potential for further study (6 Table 3).
1 When Zebrafish embryos were raised in parallel
with the medaka, leucophores were not seen and no
equivalent chromatophores were seen associated with
the brain in early development of zebrafish in the
locations where leucophores occur in medaka. What
mechanisms account for the generation of a fourth chro-
matophore type in medaka?
2 Medaka leucophores show a distinctive association
with melanophores on the surface of the body, most
highly choreographed in the dorsal stripe, and a separ-
ation from melanophores elsewhere. What mechanisms
regulate their precise patterning within the body?
3 The general patterns of pigmentation development
in the two species strongly suggest homology. Larval
medaka have leucophores, whereas larval zebrafish do
not. Nevertheless, in the DS, the leucophore pattern in
developing medaka up to about 5 dpf shows strong par-
allels to the iridophore pattern of zebrafish (Figure 5),
and the timing of their ontogenies is similar. What are
the patterning mechanisms mediating chromatophore
maturation, specification and interactions in these two
species? In particular, what is the ontogenic and genetic
relationship between iridophores and leucophores?
Table 3. Developmental time line*
comparative time line of development of
zebra fish and medaka. Zebra fish data
obtained from Kimmel et al., 1995.
Medaka from our observations
Time Line 26o melanophoresMedaka - Egg fertilized leukophores
iridophoresZebra Fish xanthophores
- Mphores - 1 d Stage 17, 1 d 1 h Early neurula
-
- 2 d Stage 25, 2 d 2 h 18 Somite
-
Xanth & - 3 d Stage 29, 3 d 2 h 34 Somite- Iridphore
-
- 4 d Stage 31, 3 d 23 h Gill blood vessels
-
-Embryo - 5 d Stage 34, 5 d 1 h Pectoral fin blood Pattern Complete
-
6 d Stage 36 Heart development
-
7 d Stage 37 Pericardial cavity
-
8 d Stage 38 Spleen development
-
9 d Stage 39 Hatching
Medaka begin to shed embryonic melanophores and develop adult type
28.5o
Lamoreux et al.
70 Pigment Cell Res. 18; 64–73
Conversion of chromatophores from one type to another
has been documented in Bagnara et al. (1979); Ide
(1979) and Ide and Hama (1976)7 . However, a survey of
the medaka pigment mutants does not suggest a basis
for assuming their lateral conversion during normal
development, nor does it provide clues to vertical origin
of any one of the chromatophore types from another
type. The question is intriguing.
4 In subsequent embryonic development, the leu-
cophores of medaka essentially continue their cluster
relationship with melanophores, while the iridophores of
the zebrafish proceed to create the central stripe, bor-
dered on each side by melanophore stripes. What
mechanisms mediate these different behaviours? Inter-
estingly, in the medaka ci mutants leucophores of the
central stripe tend to elongate in such a way that they
appear to form a rather fragmented central leucophore
stripe bordered by melanophores. Understanding ci may
help to clarify this issue.
All the above observations warrant further study, and
we hope our accounting of them will make the means
more readily available. Clearly, availability of the medaka
model enhances and complements the zebrafish and
the mouse models.
Supplementary Material
The following material is available from: http://
www.blackwellpublishing.com/products/journals/suppmat/
PCR/PCR216/PCR216sm.htm
Appendix A1 Terminology, materials and methods.
Appendix A2 Embryonic development in detail.
Figure S1 Photography of medaka embryos.8
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by Visiting Research Fellowships (Nagoya
University) to LL and RNK. Zebrafish eggs were generously made
available by Dr. Hiroyuki Takeda of the National Institute of Genet-
ics, Mishima, Japan.
We thank Ms Chikako Inoue for preparation and arrangement of
experimental materials (fish). We wish to express our sincere
appreciation to Professor Jiro Matsumoto, who is and has been a
catalyst for changing lives as well as changing science.
References
Ando, S., and Wakamatsu, Y. (1995). Production of chimeric med-
aka (Oryzias latipes). The Fish Biol. J. MEDAKA 7, 65–68.
Bagnara, J.T. (1998). Comparative anatomy and physiology of pig-
ment cells in nonmammalian tissues. In The Pigmentary System:
Physiology and Pathophysiology, J.J. Nordlund, R. Boissy, V.J.
Hearing, R.A. King, J.-P Ortonne, eds. (New York: Oxford Univer-
sity Press), pp. 9–40.
Bagnara, J.T., and Hadley, M.E. (1973). Chromatophores and Color
Change (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).
Bagnara, J.T., Matsumoto, J., Ferris, W., Frost, S.K., Turner, W.A.
Jr, Tchen, T.T., and Taylor, J.D. (1979). Common origin of pig-
ment cells. Science 203, 410–415.
Fukamachi, S., Shimada, A., Naruse, K., and Shima, A. (2001).
Genomic analysis of gamma-ray-induced germ-cell mutations at
the b locus recovered from the medaka specific-locus test.
Mutat. Res. 458, 19–29.
Furutani-Seiki, M., and Wittbrodt, J. (2004). Medaka and zebrafish,
an evolutionary twin study. Mech. Dev. 121, 629–637.
Furutani-Seiki, M., Sasado, T., Morinaga, C., Suwa, H., Niwa, K.,
Yoda, H., Deguchi, T., Hirose, Y., Yasuoka, A., Henrich, T. et al.
(2004b). A systematic genome-wide screen for mutations affect-
ing organogenesis in Medaka, Oryzias latipes. Mech. Dev. 121,
647–658.
Hama, T. (1970). On the coexistence of drosopterin and purine
(Drosopterinosome) in the leucophore of Oryzias latipes (Teleos-
tean Fish) and the effect of phenylthiourea and melamine. In
Chemistry and Biology of Pteridines (Proc. 4th Inter. Symp. on
Pteridines. Toba, 1969). Internat. Acad. Printing Co. Ltd, pp. 391–
398.10
Hama, T. (1975). Chromatophores and Iridocytes. In Medaka (Killi-
fish) Biology and Strains, T. Yamamoto, ed. (Tokyo: Keigaku Pub-
lishing), pp. 138–153.
Hama, T., and Hasegawa, H. (1967). Studies on the chromatoph-
ores of Oryzias latipes (Teleostean fish): behavior of the pteri-
dine, fat and carotenoid during xanathophore differentiation in
the color varieties. Proc. Japan Acad. 43, 901–906.
Hama, T., Goto, T., Tohnoki, Y., and Hiyama, Y. (1965). The relation
between the pterins and chromatophores in the Medaka, Oryzias
latipes. Proc. Japan Acad. 41, 305–309.
Hirao, S., Kikuchi, R., and Hama, T. (1969). The carotenoids of the
medaka, Oryzias latipes, a teleost. Bull. Jap. Soc. Sci. Fish 35,
187–198.
Hishida, T., Tomita, T., and Yamamoto, H. (1961). Melanin forma-
tion in color varieties of the medaka. Embryologia 5, 335–346.
Hong, Y., Winkler, C., and Schartl, M. (1996). Pluripotency and dif-
ferentiation of embryonic stem cell lines from the medakafish (O-
ryzias latipes). Mech. Dev. 60, 33–44.
Hong, Y., Winkler, C., and Schartl, M. (1998). Production of med-
akafish chimeras from a stable embryonic stem cell line. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 3679–3684.
Ide, H. (1979). Interconversion between pigment cells in cell cul-
ture. Pigment Cell 4, 28–34.
Figure 5. (A) Zebrafish at 4 dpf showing a dorsal pattern of
pigmentation that is essentially similar to that of medaka even to
the phenocopy of leucophores each centred within a group of
melanophores. (B) Zebrafish at 6 dpf, showing that these cells in
the zebrafish have elongated, aligned themselves in a central stripe
composed of cells that are clearly phenotypical iridophores,
bordered on each side by melanophore stripes. The phenotype of
the medaka, matures as serially aligned leucophores each of which
is surrounded by several melanophores.
Pigment pattern formation1
Pigment Cell Res. 18; 64–73 71
Ide, H., and Hama, T. (1969). Subcellular localization of tyrosinase
and pteridines of the chromatophores in Oryzias latipes (Teleos-
tean fish). Proc. Japan Acad. 45, 51–56.
Ide, H., and Hama, T. (1976). Transformation of amphibian irido-
phores into melanophores in clonal culture. Dev. Biol. 53, 297–
302.
Inagaki, H., Bessho, Y., Koga, A., and Hori, H. (1994). Expression of
the tyrosinase-encoding gene in a colorless melanophore mutant
of the medaka fish, Oryzias latipes. Gene. 150, 319–324.
Ishikawa, Y. (2000). Medakafish as a model system for vertebrate
developmental genetics. BioEssays 22, 487–495.
Iwamatsu, T. (1997). The Integrated Book for the Biology of the
Medaka (Okayama: Daigaku Kyoiku Publ Co) (Japanese).
Iwamatsu, T. (2004). Stages of normal development in the medaka
Oryzias latipes. Mech. Dev. 121, 605–618.
Johnson, S.L., Africa, D., Walker, C., and Weston, J.A. (1995). Gen-
etic control of adult pigment stripe development in zebrafish.
Dev. Biol.. 167, 27–33.
Kamai-Takeuchi, I., and Hama, T. (1971). Structural change of pteri-
nosome (pteridine pigment granule) during the xanthophore dif-
ferentiation of Oryzias fish. J. Ultrastr. Res. 34, 452–463.
Kamei-Takeuchi, I., Eguchi, G., and Hama, T. (1968). Ultrastructure
of the Pteridine pigment granules of the larval xanthophore and
leucophore in Oryzias latipes (Teleost Fish). Proc. Japan Acad.
44, 959–963.14
Kawaguti, S., and Takeuchi, T. (1968). Electron microscopy on
guanophores of the medaka, Oryzias latipes. Biol. J. Okayama
Univ. 14, 55–65.
Kelsh, R.N., Inoue, C., Momoi, A., Kondoh, H., Furutani-Seiki, M.,
Ozato, K., and Wakamatsu, Y. (2004). The Tomita collection of
medaka pigmentation mutants as a resource for understanding
neural crest cell development. Mech. Dev. 121, 841–859.
Kimmel, C.B., Ballard, W.W., Kimmel, S.R., Ullmann, B., and Schil-
ling, T.F. (1995). Stages of Embryonic Development of the Zebra-
fish (Developmental Dynamics, New York: Wiley-Liss).
Kirchen, R., and West, W. The Japanese Medaka: Its Care and
Development (Burlington, NC: The Developmental Biology and
Photography Departments, Carolina Biological Supply Company).15
Matsumoto, J., Ono, H., and Hirose, E. (1996). Recent advances in
molecular biology on pigmentation of the medaka, Oryzias lati-
pes. The Fish Biol. J. MEDAKA. 8, 29–35.
Menter, D.G., Okiba, M., Tchen, T.T., and Taylor, J.D. (1979). Leu-
cophores and iridophores of Fundulus heteroclitus. Biophysical
and ultrastructural properties. J. Morphol. 160, 103–119.
Milos, N., and Dingle, A.D. (1978a20 ). Dynamics of pigment pattern
formation in the Zebrafish, Brachydanio rerio. I. Establishment
and regulation of the lateral line melanophore stripe during the
first eight days of development. J. Exp. Zool. 205, 205–216.
Milos, N., and Dingle, A.D. (1978b21 ). Dynamics of pigment pattern
formation in the Zebrafish, Brachydanio rerio. II. Lability of lateral
line stripe formation and regulation of pattern defects. J. Exp.
Zool. 205, 217–224.
Nakajima, Y., and Obika, M. (1986). Growth and maturation of mel-
anosomes in the melanophores of a teleost, Oryzias latipes. Cell
and Tissue Res. 244, 279–283.
Naruse, K., Ijiri, K., Shima, A., and Egami, N. (1985). The production
of cloned fish in the medaka (Oryzias latipes). J. Exp. Zool. 236,
335–341.
Naruse, K., Fukamachi, S., Mitani, H., Kondo, M., Matsuoka, T.,
Kondo, S, Hanamura, N., Morita, Y., Hasegawa, K, Nishigaki, R
et al. (2000). A detailed linkage map of medaka, Oryzias latipes:
comparative genomics and genome evolution. Genetics. 154,
1773–1784.
Naruse, K., Tanaka, M., Mita, K., Shima, A., Postlethwait, J., and
Mitani, H. (2004a). A medaka gene map: the trace of ancestral
vertebrate proto-chromosomes revealed by comparative gene
mapping. Genome Res. 14, 820–828. Epub 2004 Apr 12.
Naruse, K., Hori, H., Shimizu, N., Kohara, Y., and Takeda, H.
(2004b). Medaka genomics: a bridge between mutant phenotype
and gene function. Mech. Dev. 201, 619–628.
Niwa, K., Kani, S., Kinoshita, M., Ozato, K., and Wakamatsu, Y.
(2000). Expression of GFP in nuclear transplants generated by
transplantation of embryonic cell nuclei from GFP-transgenic fish
into nonenucleated eggs of medaka, Oryzias latipes. Cloning. 2,
23–34.
Obika, M. (1988). Ultrastructure and physiological response of
leucophores of the medaka Oryzias latipes. Zool. Sci. 5, 311–
321.22
Obika, M. (1993). Formation of pterinosomes and carotenoid gran-
ules in xanthophores of the teleost Oryzias latipes as revealed by
the rapid-freezing and freeze-substitution method. Cell & Tissue
Res. 271, 81–86.
Obika, M. (1996). Morphology of chromatophores of the medaka.
The Fish Biol. J. MEDAKA. 8, 21–27.
Obika, M., and Fukuzawa, T. (1993). Cytoskeletal architecture of
dermal chromatophores of the freshwater teleost Oryzias latipes.
Pigment Cell Res. 6, 417–422.
Ozato, K., and Wakamatsu, Y. (1994). Developmental genetics of
medaka. Dev. Growth & Differ. 36, 437–443.
Ozato, K., Wakamatsu, Y., and Inoue, K. (1992). Medaka as a
model of transgenic fish. Mol. Mar. Biol. Biotechnol. 1, 346–354.
Packer, A. (2001). Medaka on the move. Nat. Genet. 28, 302.
Seiji, M., Shimao, K., Birbeck, M.S.C., and Fitzpatrick, T.B. (1963).
Subcellular localization of melanin biosynthesis. Ann. NY Acad.
Sci. 100, 497.25
Strussman, C.A., Nakatsugawa, H., Takashima, F., Hasobe, M.,
Suzuki, T., and Takai, R. (1999). Cryopreservation of isolated fish
blastomeres: effects of cell stage, cryoprotectant concentration and
cooling rate on postthawing survival. Cryobiology. 39, 252–261.
Takeuchi, K. (1960). The behavior of carotenoid metabolism of
xanthophores during development of the Medaka (Oryzias lati-
pes). Embryologia. 5, 170–177.
Takeuchi, K. (1961). A study on carotenoid metabolism in the
Wakin (Carassius auratus) and the Medaka (Oryzias latipes).
Annot. Zool. Jap. 34, 11–17.
Takeuchi, K. (1968). Specificity of carotenoid transfer in the larval
medaka, Oryzias latipes. J. Cell Physiol. 72, 43–48.
Takeuchi, T. (1975). Inheritance of main color varieties and their
chromatophores. In Medaka (Killifish): Biology and Strains,
T. Yamamoto, ed. (Tokyo: Keigaku Pub. Co.), pp. 138–153.
Takeuchi, T. (1982). Development of chromatosomes during early
embryogenesis in the medaka, Oryzias latipes. Medaka. 1, 13–15.
Tomita, H. (1992). The lists of the mutants and strains of the med-
aka, common gambusia, silver crucian carp, goldfish, and golden
venus fish maintained in the Laboratory of Freshwater Fish
Stocks, Nagoya University. The Fish Biol. J. MEDAKA. 4, 45–47.
Tomita, H., and Hishida, T. (1961a). A quantitative study on phenol
oxidase of skins in color varieties of the medaka (Oryzias latipes).
Embryologia 5, 347–356.
Tomita, H., and Hishida, T. (1961b). On the phenol oxidase of
embryonic and larval stages of the medaka (Oryzias latipes).
Embryologia 5, 423–439.
Wada, H., Naruse, K., Shimada, A., and Shima, A. (1995). A genetic
linkage map of a fish, the Japanese Medaka (Oryzias latipes).
Mol. Mar. Biol. Biotechnol. 4, 269–272.
Wada, H., Shimada, A., Fukamachi, S., Naruse, K., and Shima, A.
(1998). Sex-linked inheritance of the lf locus in the medaka fish
(Oryzias latipes). Zool. Sci. 15, 123–126.
Wakamatsu, Y. (1997). Preparation of medaka hatching enzyme.
The Fish Biol. J. MEDAKA. 9, 49–50.
Lamoreux et al.
72 Pigment Cell Res. 18; 64–73
Wakamatsu, Y., Ozato, K., Hashimoto, H., Kinoshita, M., Sakaguchi,
M., Iwamatsu, T., Hyodo-Taguchi, Y., and Tomita, H. (1993).
Generation of germ-line chimeras in medaka (Oryzias latipes).
Mol. Mar. Biol. Biotechnol. 2, 325–332.
Wakamatsu, Y., Ozato, K., and Sasado, T. (1994). Establishment of
a pluripotent cell line derived from a medaka (Oryzias latipes)
blastula embryo. Mol. Mar. Biol. Biotechnol. 3, 185–191.
Wakamatsu, Y., Ju, B., Pristyaznhyuk, I., Niwa, K. Ladygina, T.,
Kinoshita, M., Araki, K.I., and Ozato, K. (2001a27 ). Fertile and dip-
loid nuclear transplants derived from embryonic cells of a small
laboratory fish, medaka (Oryzias latipes). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA 98, 1071–1076.
Yamamoto, T. (Ed.) (1975) Medaka (Killifish): Biology and Strains
(Tokyo: Keigaku Publ. Co.), pp. 30–58.
Ziegler, I. (2003). The pteridine pathway in zebrafish: regulation and
specification during the determination of neural crest cell fate.
Pigment Cell Res. 16, 172–182.
Pigment pattern formation1
Pigment Cell Res. 18; 64–73 73