october 20, 2010 - maryland board of public works

MINUTES

OF THE

MEETING OF THE

BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS

October 20, 2010

BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKSTABLE OF CONTENTS

OCTOBER 20, 2010

I. ITEMS SUBMITTED ON THE SECRETARY'S AGENDADepartment of AgricultureAgricultural Cost Share Program 4-6

Board of Public WorksProcurement Agency Activity Report 7Wetlands licenses 8

DepartInent of Education 9-10Department of the Environment 11-17Maryland Food Center Authority 18Department of Housing & Community Development.. 19.27Maryland EnvironrnentaIService 28Department of Natural Resources 29Maryland Environmental Trust 30.31

State Public School Construction Program 32Comptroller (Registers of Wills) 33-34Clerks of the Circuit Courts 35-36APPENDV<... 37-41SUPPLEMENT A - Program Open Space 42.57SUPPLEMENT B - Budget &Management.. 58-74SUPPLEMENT C - University System of Maryland 75-82SUPPLEMENT D - Department of Information Technology 83-91

II. ITEMS SUBMITTED QN THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTA nON AGENDA:Construction Contracts 92-95AlE Contracts 96-102Maintenance Contracts 103-112Equipment Con tracts....... 113-121Construction Contract 122-124

III. ITEMS SUBMITTED ON THE DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES AGENDA:Construction Contract Modification 125-126Maintenance Contracts 127-128Real Property 129-140Leases 141-144Capita 1Gran ts and Loans 145-154

INDEX .......................... 15 6-15 7

MINUTES OF THE MEETING OFTHE BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS, OCTOBER 20, 2010

The Board of Public Works met in the Governor's Reception Room, State House,Annapolis, Maryland, on Wednesday, October 20, 2010.

Board Members present:

The Honorable Martin O'Mailey, GovernorThe Honorable Nancy K. Kopp, TreasurerThe Honorable Peter Franchot, Comptroller

Also present:Al Collins, Secretary, Department of General ServicesT. Eloise Foster, Secretary, Department of Budget &Management

CONSTRUCTION:General Construction Project Contingency Fund 1988Maryland Consolidated Capital Bond Loan of 2002Maryland Consolidated Capital Bond Loan of 2004Maryland Consolidated Capital Bond Loan of 2005Maryland Consolidated Capital Bond Loan of 2006Maryland Consolidated Capital Bond Loan of 2007Maryland Consolidated Capital Bond Loan of 2008Maryland Consolidated Capital Bond Loan of 2009Maryland Consolidated Capital Bond Loan of 2010

On items where payments are to be made from proceeds of the above listed bondissues, full regard is given to the provisions of each Act and its prospective amendments.

Except as otherwise provided in these Acts, before the State agency or institutionresponsible for an individual item may begin work with funds secured under the Act, theagency or institution shall provide satisfactory assurances to the Board of Public Works that thework described in the individual items can be completed with the funds specified for that item.

If federal funds are available to help accomplish any project identified in these Acts, theState agency or institution responsible for the project shall make efforts through properadministrative procedures to obtain these federal funds. Before spending any funds securedunder these Acts, the agency or institution shall certify its efforts to the Board of Public Worksand state the reason for any failure to obtain federal funds. If federal funds are obtained, theyshall be used to defray the costs of the project described in these Acts, not to expand its scope.


OCTORER 20, 2010

SECRETARY'S AGENDA

NonnanAstle (410) [email protected]

I. IlEPARnmNT OF AGIUCULTUREMaryland Agricultural Cost-Share Program Grall! Requej"ts

Recommem/atioll: That the Board of Public Works approve funding a total of22 individualgrants under the Maryland Agricultural Cost-Share Program.

A. Total submission amount: $162,300.

Agreement #AT-2UII-1799AT-20Il-1800AT-2011-IRQ!AT-2011-IR02AT-2011-1844[11-2011-1793ell-2011-1813CR-2011-1858MP-20 11-1784MP-2011-1816MP-2011-1842-RMP-2011-1859MP-2011-1860MP-2011-1861MP-2011-1862MP-2011-1871MP-2011-1872MP-2011-1873PA-2011-1809RS.2011-1869

RecipientRAYMOND A. COPSEY. SRRAYMOND A. COPSEY. SR.RAYMOND A. COPSEY, SR.RAYMOND A COPSEY, SR.GEORGE O. MORRISJ. ANDREW CHANCERATHELL FAMILY LTD. PTN.ROSALIA K. SEWARDM. DENNIS SIIAFERGEORGE L. STOrrLEMYERPHILIP D, HASSLERHERMAN J. STEFFENHERMAN J. STEFFENHERMAN J. STEFFENHERMAN J. STEFFENMYRON J. MARTINBROADVIEW FARMS, INC.BROADVIEW FARMS, INC.THOMAS M. KREIDLERTREMPER BROTIIERS

CountySt, Mary'sSI. Mary's51. Mary'sSI. Mary'sQueen Anne'sKentTalbotDorchesterFrederickFrederickCarrollCarrollCarrollCarrollCarrollWashingtonCarrollCarrollAnne ArundelCarroll

Amount8,2001,5009,5004,800600

3,80011,9003,9001,9003,2001,30010,1001,5004,90011,80035,0006,2002,00030,6009,600

FlInd Source: MCCBL of 2009/1tcm 09083: Provide funds for assistance for {he implementationl?lhest management practices that reduce soil and nutrient runoIffrom Marylandfarms.

I3. Total submission amount: $41,500.

Agreement #MP-2011-1817PR-2010-2272-B

RecipientGEORGE L. ST01TLEMYER5EONG K. LEE

CountyFrederickSomerset

Amount6,50035,000

Fuud Source: CBTF of20 II/Item S5 I03: Provide fund,; for assisfance for the implementationo.fbest managemem practices that reduce soil and nutrient runofffrom Marylandfarms.

mailto:[email protected]

•

2BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS

OCTOBER20, 2010

SECRETARY'S AGE;'IiDA

I. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE (cont'd)Maryland Agricultural Cost-Share Program Grallt Requests

Au/horit)': "Cost-Sharing ~Water Pollution Control" Sections 8~701 to 8-705, AgriculturalArticle, Maryland Code; COMAR 15.01.05

Remarks: The Maryland Department of Agriculture has determined that each of these projects iseligible for cost-share funds. Each project has received technical certification from the appropriateSoil Conscn.tation District Office. The farmer has signed the requisite cost-share agreement andaccepts the grant conditions .

BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS ACTION: TilE ABOVE REFERENCED ITEM WAS:

CAPPROVED~ DISAPPROVED DEFERRED WITIIDIUW~

WITH DISCUSSION WITHOUT DISCUSSION

5


OCTOBeR 20, 201 0

SECRETARY'S AGENDA

Nonnan Astle (410) [email protected]

2. DF,I'ARTMENT OF AGRICULTUREMaryland Agricultural Cos/-Share Progfllm AdditilJlUlI Funding Requests

Recommendation: That the Board of Public \Vorks approve AI)J)ITIO~'A.LFUl'"D1:\G of 3individual grants under the Maryland Agricultural Cost-Share Program.

A. Total submission amount: $1,227.02.

Agreement #Mp.2010-]807MP.2010-1884

RecipientRONALD O. SCHUELERIIUFFER BROTHERS, LLC

CountyCarrollFrederick

Amount S1,086.34\40.68

Fund Source: MCCllL of2008/ltcm 08066: Provide jimdsjor assistance/or the implemen1ationof best management practices that reduce suil and nlf1rienl runoffFom Alary/and farms.

B. Total submission amount: $3,538.72.

Agreement #RS.2008.3589

RecipientGABRIEL S. ZEPP

CountyCarroll

Amount $3,538.72

Fund Source: cnTF of 20 11litem 55103: Provide fimdsJor assistanc'e for the implementationof best managemel1f practices thai reduce soil and nutrient runofffrom AfarylandJarms.

A ur!lority: "Cost-Sharing - Water Pollution Control" Sections 8-70 I to 8-705, AgriculturalArticle, Maryland Code; COMAR 15.01.05

Remarks: The Maryland Department of Agriculture has determined that eaeh of these projects iseligible for cost-share funds. Each project has received technical certification from the appropriateSoil Conservation District Office. The farmer has signed the requisite cost. share agreement andaccepts the grant conditions.

Additional funds arc requested for these projects to offset additional costs realized at thecompletion of the project. These additional costs are a result of design changes required based onsite conditions encountered during construction, design changes to improve project effectiveness,or because the level of co-cost share funding originally anticipated was not available when theproject was completed.

BOAR» OF PUBLIC WORKS ACTIO:\': TII[ ABOVE REFERE;'\;C[J) In::\1 WAS:

C APPROVEU> DISAPrROVED J)EF 'ITlWRAWN

WITII DISCUSSION WITIIOlJT D1SClTSSIO:"ri

6


4


OCTOBER20, 2010

SECRETARY'S AGENDA

Contact: Mary Jo Childs [email protected]

3. BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKSProcurement Agency Activity Report

Submission of the Procurement Agency Activity Reports by:

A. Department of General Services, April and May 2010

B. Department of Public Safety & Correctional Services, July and August 2010

C. State Treasurer's Office, 2nd Quarter 2010

to the Board of Public Works In accordance with COMAR 21.02.01.05 (ProcurementRegulations).

BOARD OF "IJBUC WORKS ACTION: TilE ABOVE REFERENCED ITEM WAS:

~O:;::> t>lSAPPROVED DEFERRED WITHDRAW'

•••WITII IlISCllSSIO:'oi WITHOUT DlSCUSSI .

7


5

BOARD OF PUBLIC WOIlKS

OCTOBER 20, 201 ()

SECRETARY'S AGENDA

Contact: Doldon Moore [email protected]

4. BOAIlD OF PUBLIC WOIlKSWetlmuh License,Oj

Approval is requested of the following applications for wetlands licenses for projectsinvolving dredging or filling or both in the navigable waters of Maryland. The Board of PublicWorks' Wetlands Administrator recommends that a license be granted as indicated. TheDepartment of the Environment fully concurs with this recommendation.

Authorify: Title 16, Envirorunent Article, Maryland Code; COMAR 23.02.04.

ANNE AIlUNIlEL COUNTY

10-0628

CECIL COUNTY

10-0436

TALBOT COUNTY

10-0784

ROBERT BATES - To hydraulically/mechanically dredge a spurchannel - Mill Creek, Arnold

MURL CLARK & JOE HOOSIER - To emplace a stonebreakwater - Chesapeake Bay, Earleville

MD DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES - To remove adeteriorated timber bulkhead and emplace and repair a stonerevetmcnt - Chcsapeake Bay, Tilghman Island

RUAIU> OF PUBLIC WORKS ACTIO;o.;: TilE AnOVE REFEll.E!".CF:I> ITEM WAS:

WITIIOUT DISCUSSION

APPROVED ()JSAPPROVED

WITII I>ISClISSIO:"rt

DEFERRED WITHDRAWN

8



OCTOBER 20, 2010

SECRETARY'S AGENDA

Contact: Albert Annan (410) 767-0114aannan!a),ffisde.state.md. us

5. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONCOllllf}' Library Capital Project Grant Program

Recommendation: That the Board of Public Works rescind two capital grants and reallocate thefunds to eligible county library capital projects as described.

Background: Reference is made to Secretary's Agenda Item 4 (5/19/10) and Secretary'sAgenda Item 8 (6/3/09) in which the Board of Public Works approved the State Department ofEducation's fiscal years 2011 and 2010 grants to county public library systems through theCounty Library Capital Project Grant Program. The law authorizing the grants requires grantrecipient to match their grants. Since the Board approved the grants, budget difficulties havecaused two proposed grant recipients to rescind their matching funds, meaning they are no longereligible for the grants. MSDE recommends reallocating those funds as additional b'Tantfunds tolibrary projects that the Board previously approved.

Fund Source:

MCCBL 2010: County Library Capital Project Grant ProgramMCCBL 2011: County Library Capital Project Grant Program

Total:

$375.000$450,000$825,000

Alilhority: Education Article, Section 23-510, Annotated Code of MarylandCOMAR I3A.05.04.08H

Grallts Rescinded:

Wicomico County (FY 2010 Grant) $375,000Central Library site acquisition: Wicomico County is rescinding its match because it must use itsfunds instead to offset a 43% county library operating budget reduction.

Frederick Cmlnr)' (FY201 I Grant) $450,000Walkersville Branch construction: Frederick County is suspending FY 2011 capital projects.

Reallocation: MSDE recommends that the $825,000 in rescinded funds be reallocated asadditional funds to library projects for which the Board previously approved grants (Sec. Item 4[5/19110]). The rescinded funds are being reallocated to projects that were not fully funded.These projects benefiting from the additional funding have been fully vetted by the MSDElibrary projects review committee, the Maryland State Board of Education, and the Departmentof Budget and Management.

9


OCTOBER20, 2010

SECRETARY'S AGENDA

5. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION (conl'd)Coullty Library Capital Project Grallt Program

7

Grantee

Montgomery Co.

St. Mary's Co.

Talbot Co.

Washington Co.

Library Projects

Gaithersburg Library: renovate and expand the29-year old busiest full service branch from 33,726to 61,471 sq. ft to enhance programs.

Leonardtown Library: complete the design of39,000 sq. ft. new library to replace existing16.000 sq. ft library rendered functionallyinadequate.

A/ain Library, Easton: renovate and expand3 I-year old Talbot County Free Library from18,000 sq. ft. to 28,000 sq. ft.

Afain Librmy, Hagerstown: renovate and expandWashington County Free Library which sharesspace \\lith Western Maryland Regional Library.

Amount

$125,000

$50,000

$475,000

$175,000

Project Costs:This Action Previous Action Total Granted. County Match

Wicomico ($375,000) $375,000 0 N/AFrederick ($450,000) $450,000 0 N/AMontgomery $125,000 $600,000 $725,000 $12,040.000St. Mary's $50,000 $765,000 $815,000 $ 962,000Talbot $475,000 $765,000 $1,240,000 $ 6,532,000Washington $175,000 $500,000 $675,000 $ 3,660,000

BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS ACTIOS: THE ABOVE REFERENCED ITEM WAS:

C:;PRov;i:) DISAPPROVED DEFERRED WITHDRAWN

WITH DISCUSSION WITIIOUT DlSCUSSI01'll

10


OCTonER 20, 2010

SF:CRETARY'S ACEj\'DA

Cuntact Person: Terri Wilson (410) 537-4155twilsun@mdc,statc.rnd.us !~c.statc.md.us

6. l\lARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF TilE ENVIRONl\tENT

Recommem/aliolJ: Thai the Board of Public Works approve further funding up to $8,589,000to the Tow-nof Thurmont for the Thurmont \\'astcwatcr Treatment Plant (\V\VTP)Enhanced Nutrient Removal (ENR) Upgl"ade project in Frederick County. (LegislativeDistrict 4A)

Project Description: The project is to plan, design and construct ENR facilities at the existing1.0 million gallons per day Thurmont Wastewater Treatment Plant. After the ENR upgrade iscomplete, the plant will achieve an effluent goal of 3 mg/l for total nitrogen and 0.3 mg/l for totalphosphorous, The upgrade ",'ill reduce nutrients to Ilunting Creek, the Monocacy River andultimately the Chesapeake Bay,

A. New Loan lip to S2,OOO,OOO- 'Vater Qualit}' State Revolving Loan Fund. The Townwill repay the loan in a period not to exceed 20 years following project completion at an interestrate of 50% of the average of the Bond Buyer 11~Bond Index for the month preceding loanclosing, currently estimated at a 2.00% interest rate. To secure this debt, the Town will deliverits bond along \\'ith its full faith and credit endorsement to MDE.

B. Grant Increase up to S6,589,OOO- Ray Restoration Fund (BR-NR 05.11)

Project Fwulillg Sourcf!j':'Vater Qualit~' St;lte Revolving Loan Fund (this action)Bll)' R,,'stor:ttion Fund Grant BR-NR 05.11 (this nction)Bay Restoration Fund Grant BR-NR 05.11 (previously approved 10/17/07)Local FundingTOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST:

S 2,nOn,000S 6,589,0110S 30n,000S 1,155,253$ 10,044,253

AllI!lority: The Maryland Water Quality Financing Administration Act, Sections 9-1601 through9-1622 of the Environment Article, Maryland Code.

MOE has determined this project to be consistenl with Maryland's Priority Places Strategy inaccordance with Executive Order 01.01.2003.33. The project is consistent with StateClearinghouse comments and recommendations,

WITIIOUT J)JSCtJSSI ,

DEFERRED

BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS ACTlO:"i: TilE ABOVE REFERE:\CEH ITE:\I WAS:

CROV~ IllS,'PPROVED

WITII D1SCUSSIO:\

WITIIURAW:\

11

mailto:twilsun@mdc,statc.rnd.us


OCTOBER 20, 201 0

SECRETARY'S AGENIM

Contact Person: Terri Wilson (410) 537.4155lwiison/c/:mdc .state .md. us I crei [email protected]

7, MARYLANDDF:PARTMENT OF TIlE F:NYIRONMENT

Recommendation: That the Board of Public Works approve a new loan up to $1,500,000 to theCity of Aberdeen for the Aberdeen \Vastcwatcr Trtalmcnt Plant (\\'\VTP) EnhancedNutrient Remon,. (ENR) Upgrade project in Harford County. (Legislative District 34A).

Loan Description: Repayment may be forgiven as a disadvantaged community under the federalCleun Water Act. The loan terms are enforceable should there be a programmatic default on theloan agreement. To secure this debt. the City of Aberdeen will deliver its bond along with its fullfaith and credit endorsement to MOE.

Project DeR'ription: The project is to plan, design and construct the ENR facilities at theexisting 4.0 million gallons per day City of Aberdeen Advanced Wastev./ater Treatment Plant toachieve effluent concentration goals of 3 mg/l for total nitrogen and 0.3 mg/I for totalphosphorous.

Project Funding SOllrce.~:\Vatcr Quality Rcvolving Loan Fund w/Principal Forgiveness (this llclion)Water Quality Revolving Loan Fund (previously approved 6/9/10)Bay Restoration Fund Grant BR~NR 0l.l3 (most recent action 6/9/10)Local FundingTOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST:

S 1,500,0005 8,500,000514,982,0005 848,743525,830,743

Alit/writ)'." The Maryland Water Quality Financing Administration Act, Sections 9~1601 through9~1622 of the Environment Article, !vlaryland Code.

MOE has detemlined this project to be consistent with Maryland's Priority Places Strategy inaccordance with Executive Order 01.01.2003.33, The project is consistent \'iith StateClearinghouse comments and recommendations.

BO,\RD OF PUBLIC WORKS ACTION: TilE AHOVE REFERE:\'CEU ITEM WAS:

0ROVED;;> DISAPPROVED llEFElmEIl WITHDRAWN

••• WITII DJSCVSSJ()~ WlTlIOtlT (>ISctJSSION

12



OCTOBER 20, 2010

SECRETARY'S AGEl"DA

Contact Person: Terri Wilson (410) 537-4155twiIson:a;mde.state.md.us / creillv!W,mde.state.md.us

8. MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT

Recommendation: That the Board of Public Works approve new loans up to $449,000 to theTown of Denton for the Denton Wastewater Treatment Plant Enhanced Nutrient Removal(ENR) Upgrade project in Caroline County. (Legislative District 378)To secure this debt, the Town of Denton will deliver its bond, along with its full faith and creditendorsement, to the Maryland Water Quality Financing Administration.

A. Up to 556,000 loan to be repaid over a period not to exceed 20 years following projectcompletion, at an interest rate 0£25% of the average of the Bond Buyer II-Bond Index for themonth preceding loan closing, currently estimated at 1.00% interest rate.

8. Up to $393,000 will be Principal Forgiyeness loan. Repayment may be forgiven as adisadvantaged community under the federal Clean Water Act. The loan tenus are enforceableshould there be a programmatic default on the loan agreement.

Project Description: The project is to plan, design and construct ENR facilities at the existing0.8 mgd Denton Wastewater Treatment Plant. After the ENR upgrade is complete, the DentonWWTP will be able to achieve effluent quality with annual average nutrient goals of 3 mg/I fortotal nitrogen and 0.3 mg/I for total phosphorous. These improvements will reduce nutrientsdischarged to the Upper Choptank River and the Chesapeake Bay.

Project Funding Sources:Water Quality State ReYolving Loan Fund (this action) S 56,000Water Quality State Revolving Loan Fund w/Principal Forgiveness (this action) S 393,000Bay Restoration Fund Grant BR-NR 01.06 (most recent action 7/28/10) $4,609,000TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $5,058,000

Authority: The Maryland Water Quality Financing Administration Act, Sections 9-1601 through9-1622 of the Environment Article, Maryland Code.

MDE has determined this project to be consistent ,••..ith Maryland's Priority Places Strategy inaccordance v.ith Executive Order 01.01.2003.33. The project is consistent with StateClearinghouse comments and recommendations.

BOARD OF PUBLIC \VORKS ACTION: TilE ABOVE REFERENCEO ITEM WAS:CAPPROV;Y DISAPPROVED DEFERRED WITHDRAW"

• WITII DISCUSSION \\,'ITHOUT DISCUSSIO~

13


OCTOBER 20, 20 I 0

SECRETARY'S AGEl'illA

Contact Person: Terri Wilson (410) [email protected]/ [email protected]

9. MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THF. F.NV1H.O~l\lENT

Recommendation: That the Board of Public Works approve further grant funding up to$34,964,000 to Ilaward County for the Little Patuxent '''ater Reclamation Plant EnhancedNutrient Removal (ENR) Upgrade and Expansion project. (Legislative District 13)

Project Descriptio,,: This project is to plan, design and construct the ENR upgrade and expandthe existing Little Patuxent Water Reclamation Plant (WRP) from 25 million gallons per day to29 rngd. Afer the ENR upgrade is complete, the planl will achieve an effluent goal of 3 mg/I forlotal nitrogen and 0.3 mg/I for lotal phosphorous. These improvements will reduce nutrientsdischarged to the Little Patuxent River and ultimately the Chesapeake Bay

Project FUIldill;':Sources:Bll}' Restoration Fund Grant BR-NR 01.14 (Ihis action)Bay Restoration Fund Grant nR~NR01.14 (previously approved 12/12/07)Local FundingTOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST:

S 34,%4,000$ 530,000$ 71,968,500$107,462,500

Authorit)': The Maryland Water Quality Financing Administration Act, Sections 9-1601 through9-1622 of the Environment Article, Maryland Code.

MOE has determined this project to be consistent with Maryland's Priority Places Stralegy inaccordance with Executive Order 01.01.2003.33. The project is consistent with StateClearinghouse comments and recommendations.

BOARDOF PUBLIC WORKS ACTIO~: TilE ABOVt: Kt:I;ERE!"'OCEDITDI WAS:

C\PPROVE;::> DISAPI'ROVEI> DEFERRED WITHDRAW~

wlTn DISCUSSION WITHOUT DISCUSSIOl'i

14

mailto:[email protected]/


12HOARD OF I'VHLlC WORKS

October 20, 20 I 0

Secretary's Agenda

Contact Person: Terri Wilson (410) 537-4155{wi lsonwmdc.state. Old .us I crei [email protected]

10. MARYLAND IlEPARTMENT OF TIlE ENVIRONMENT

Recommendation: That the Board of Public Works approve a new grant up to S186,121 toBaltimore County for the Rcdhousc Run at St. Patrick Road Stream Restoration project inBaltimore County (Legislative District 8).

Project Dc!)'Criptioll: This project consists of restoring approximately 3,000 linear feet ofdegraded mainstem of Rcdhousc Run and a tributary in the Back River watershed. Restorationincludes channel realignment. bank grading. installation of stone toe protection, imbricatedriprap, rilT grade controls. and step pool structures. The project will result in reduction ofsediment discharge and nutrient loads, as well as improvement in biodiversity and groundwaterrecharge in Redhousc Run, Back River, and the Chesapeake Bay

Project Fuuding Sources:Chesapeake and Atlantic Coastal Ba)'s Nonpoint Sourcc Fund (TF 01.04) (this aClion) S 186,121Other (Section 319 Grant) $ 418,500TOTAL ESTIMATED COST, $ 604,621

Authority: The Maryland Water Quality Financing Administration Act, Sections 9~1601 through9-1622 of the Environment Article, Maryland Code.

MOE has determined this project to bc consistent with Maryland's Priority Places Strategy inaccordance with Executive Order 01.01.2003.33. The project is consistent with StateClearinghouse comments and recommendations.

nOARI> OF Pl"BLIC WORKS ACTIO:\': TilE ABOVE REFERE/'IiCED ITEM WAS:

C::OV~ DISAPPROVEIJ IJ>:FERRED WITIIIJRAW~

WITH DISCUSSION WITHOUT D1SCUSSIO:\'

15



OCTOIlER20, 2010

SECRET,\RY'S AGENDA

Contact Person: Terri Wilson (410) 537-4155twilsonrWmde .statc.md .us I creilly({l]mde.state.md.lls

11. MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF TilE ENVIRONMENT

Recommendation: That the Board of Public Works approve a substitute grantee to receive grantfunding to upgrade ansitc sewage disposal systems with nitrogen removal technologies inMontgomery Counly.

Grant Recipient:County:Amount of Grant:

Nc\\-' R.ecipient:Location:Amount of Granl:

Montgomery CountyMontgomery$78,000

Canaan Valley InstituteDavis. WV$78,000

Backgrouud: Reference is made to Secretary's Agenda Item JO (June 9, 2010) in which theBoard of Public Works approved a grant to Montgomery County 10 upgrade failing septicsystems \vith best available technologies for nitrogen removal. Montgomery County nowrequests that Canaan Valley Institute receive the grant funds to implement the grant.

Fund Source: Bay Restoration Fund Septic Fees.

Aullwrity: The Maryland Water Quality Financing Administration Act, Sections 9-1601 through9-1622 of the Environment Article, Maryland Code.

The project" is consistent with State Clearinghouse comments and recommendations.

HOARD OF I'UHLlC WORKS ACTION: THE AROVE REHRE;'IrICED ITEM WAS:

CWITHOUT I)fSCUSSIO;'lrl ::>DISAPPROVED

\\"ITII D1SCUSSIO~

DEFERRED WITHDRAWN

16

14IlOARIJ OF PUBLIC WORKS

OCTOBER 20, 2U1U

SECRETARY'S AGENDA

Contact Person: Terri Wilson (410) 537.4155l\\:ilsoll''Wmdc.statc.md. us / crcil1v((f;mde .state.md. us

12. MAIlVLANIl IlEPAIlTMENT OF TilE ENVIIlONMENT

Recommendation: That the Board of Public Works approve up to $94,500 in grant funding toCanaan Valley Institute to upgrade on-site disposal (septic) systems in Howard County, with bestavailable technology for nitrogen removal.

Program Description: Canaan Valley Institute:

• Through 2010, will use grant funds only for best available technology installations onfailing systems. Ilaward County does not have any such systems in the Critical Areas.

• Homeowners are eligible for 25% to 100% of costs as grant based on income, whilebusinesses. non-residential or rental property owners with on-site disposal systems areeligible for 25% reimbursement.

Fund Source: nay Restoration (septic) Fund

A whorily: Sections 9-1601 through 9-1622 of the Environment Article, Maryland Code, knownas the Maryland Water Quality Financing Administration Act.

The project is consistent with State Clearinghouse comments and recommendations.

WITIIOUT D1SCUSSIO:"l

DEFERRED

BOARDOF Pt:8L1C WORKS ACTlO:\: THE ABOVE REFERE:\CEIl ITE:\I WAS:

CPROVY U1SAPPROVED

WITII J)JSCUSSJON

WITIIDRAW:"I

i.7


OCTOIl>:R 20. 2010

SECRETARY'S AGENDA

Contact: Donald J. Darnall (410) 379~5760

13. MARYI.Ai'm FOOD CENTER AUTHORITY

PROPERTY:

AUTHORITY TO:LEASE PROPERTY

LEASE AMOUNT:

TENANTS:

TER~I:

Maryland Wholesale Produce Market7460-7480 Conowingo Avenue, Jessup. I Iaward County

Economic Development Artiele. g 10-212(c)(2), Maryland Code;Stale Finance and Procurement Article, S 10-305, Maryland Code

January 1, 2011 - June 30, 2012: $1157.53 a month per unitAnnual increases based on Consumer Price Index

101 Units! Multiple Tenants

January 1,2011 - June 30, 2016 (5Y:zyears)

RECOl\t\'IENUATION: That the Board of Public Works approve a generic lease that theMaryland Food Center Authority may use with tenants or the Wholesale Produce Market. MFCAfurther requests authority to modify or adjust lease clauses as it finds necessary or desirableduring the lease term to attract, retain, or accommodate tenants.

IlACKGROUN"D: The Maryland Food Center Authority O\\11Sand manages the MarylandWholesale Produce Market. The Produce Market opened in 1976 and operates as anintegral component of the Maryland Food Center complex located in Jessup. TheProduce Market comprises tv.'O buildings, approximately 330,000 square feet in size, issub-divided into 101 individual units. The produce dealers o\>,'nand operate specializedcompanies and lease their oniees, storage and dock facilities from MFCA.

Reference is made to: (a) Secretary's Item 9 (December 4, 2002), in which the Board of PublicWorks approved a five-year fonn lease for the units ending Dcccmber 2007; (b) Secretary's Item 8(November 14, 2007), in which the Board approved a Ol1c.year extension of the fonn lease endingDecember 2008; and (c) Secretary's Item 17 (December 17, 2008), in which the Hoard approved aone-year lease extension \\;th an additional one. year optional extension ending December 20 10.The only significant difference between the proposed lease and the prior form lease is that annualrent increases \vill be made in accordance with the Consumer Price Index.

BOARD OF PU8L1C ''''ORKS ACTION: TilE ,\BOVE REi'EREJ\CED ITEM WAS:

AI'I'I{OVEl> DISAPPROVED DEFERRED WITIIDRAW:\'

WITII DISCUSSIO:'ll WITHOUT DlSCUSSIO;'\"

18

16

BOARIl OF PUBLIC WORKS

OCTOBER 20, 2010

SECRETARY'S AGENIlA

Contact: Carol Gilbert 410-514-7229gilbcrt@ mdhousing.org

Kevin Baynes [email protected]

14. IlEl'ARHIENT OF 1I0USI!':G A!':1l COM~1U!':ITY IlEVELOPMENTCommunity Legacy Program - Fiscal Year 20/ J

Recommendation: The Department of I lousing and Community Developmentrecommends that the Board of Public Works approve Community Legacy Program awardstotaling $4,250,000 for Fiscal Ycar 20 II.

Fund Source: MeeBL 2010:SA2-l Community Legacy Program. Providejimds IU assislneighborhood\' with revitalization e.fforts.

•

Background: DHCD's Community Legacy Program assists urban neighborhoods,suburban communities, and small towns that are experiencing decline and disinvestment, buthave the potential, with modest public and private investment. to be vibrant places to live andwork. Participating communities must have a comprehensive revitalization plan that is anambitious but reasonable response to local needs.

The Program provides funding to assist local governments and their nonprofit partners inplanning and realizing comprehensive communilY revitalization initiatives. Community Legacyfunding will support a wide range of local iniliatives aimed at both attracting new residents andbusinesses and encouraging existing residents and businesses to remain and reinvest in acommunity. Eaeh Community Legacy project must propose benchmarks to measure quarterlyprogress.

The Secretary of I lousing and Community Development approved the recommendedapplications on September 28, 2010 .

19


HOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS

OCTOBER 20, 20 I 0

SECnKTARY'S AGENUA

14. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (cont'd)Commullity Legacy Program - Fi!u:al Year 201 J

17

PROGRAM AWARDEE PROJECT DESCRIPTION AWARDAMOUNT

CL - Grant Aberdeen, City of Implement a Facade Improvement Program to make downtown more $ 25,000visually appealing.

CL • Loan Annapolis, City of Demolish 123 units of vacant public housing for construction of 123 $225,000- Clay Street units of new public/private affordable housing_

CL - Grant Arundel Purchase homes in Brooklyn Park which are sold 10 limited income $200,000Community first lime home buyers.DevelopmentServices, Inc.

el -Gran! Baltimore Acquire and demolish vacant garages along Venable SI. to augment $100,000Development the library expansion.Corporation

Cl- Grant Baltimore Streetscape improvements within the Baltimore Main Street areas. $100,000DevelopmentCorporation

CL - Grant Baltimore Facade improvement grants to property and business owners located $100,000Development within the Local Main Street programs,Corporation

CL - Grant Bel Air, Town of Create a distinct brand identity and 10encourage revitalization, $ 50,000pedestrian traffic and mixed use development.

CL - Grant Berlin, Town of Acquire a structure in downtown Berlin for use as a Welcome Center, $125,000public restrooms, heritage display and office space for the BerlinChamber of Commerce,

CL. Grant Berlin, Town of Facade improvement grant program for the Main Street District. $ 50,000Cl- Grant Brunswick, City of Rehabilitate City Hall parking lot to increase environmental storm $ 50,000

water management, and heighten aesthetic appeal of importantgateway to downtown community.

CL - Grant Cambridge, City Streetscape improvements to the firs! block of Maryland Avenue and $100,00001 Cedar Street from Route 50 west to Dorchester Avenue.

CL - Grant Capitol Heights, Rehab of vacant commercial properly for municipal and mixed use. $100,000Town of

CL • Grant Central Baltimore Rehabilitation of a historic, vacant former school for use as a $150,000Partnership Community Center and public Montessori Middle School.

CL - Grant Central Baltimore Fal(ade improvements will include green landscaping, an outdoor $100,000Partnership sealing area, and a street-level gallery entrance; energy efficient

windows will replace existing concrete blocks.

CL - Grant Central Baltimore Renovate and offer for sale, two historic townhomes as part of a $ 80,000Partnership larger effort to establish mixed-income homeownership.

CL - Grant Chestertown, Install wireless internet to the Main Street area and adjacent parks. $ 30,000Town of

20


OCTOBER 20,2010

SECRET ARY'S AGENDA

14. DEPARTMEI\"T OF 1I0USII\"G AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (conCd)Communit)' Legacy Program - Fi.fcal Yellr 201 J

18

CL - Granl College Park. City Construcl an eco park that serves as an educational resource for $100,000of residents looking to incorporate rain gardens, native plants, and other

environmental benefits.CL - Grant Crisfield, City of Streetscape improvements in the Downtown Area. $ 75,000Cl - Grant Cumberland, City Stabilization of 164 and 168 North Centre Streel in order to preserve $ 98,000

of the streetscape within the Canal Place Preservation District for futureredevelopment.

CL - Grant Denlon, Town of Implementation of pedestrian pathways within the Fourth Street $ 50,000Redevelopment Project, including lighting, signage, public art, andoutdoor art venue soace,

CL * Grant Easton, Town of Matching grant to commercial property owners in the Historic District $ 50,000who undertake improvements to their building facades.

CL - Grant Frederick, City of Support on-going economic development revitalization initiatives in a $100,000historic Main Street by funding fat;:ade and lighting improvements,

CL - Grant Frostburg, City of Provide an incentive program for property owners to revitalize their $100,000upper stories for either residential or commercial use by offering agrant for 50% reimbursement.

CL - Grant Garrell County Installing ADA compliant, pervious walkways and native landscaping $ 50,000Community Action in front of the Transportation Museum,Commillee, Inc,

Cl - Grant Hagerstown, City Improve the quality of the housing stock in a targeted area by the $100,000of renovation of single-family and multi-family housing.

CL - Grant Hagerstown, City Acquire vacant commercial building for renovation into flex space for $ 50,000of cultural and educational institutions and a business incubator space.

CL. Grant Havre de Grace, Streetscape improvements including lighting, street trees, brick $100,000City of sidewalks, as well as the upgrade of the facade of the municipal

water treatment plant.CL. Grant Havre de Grace, Implementation of a Facade Improvement Program the in Main $ 50,000

City of Street Area,

CL - Grant Historic East Rehabilitating the former Public School #35 and the construction of a $ 50,000Baltimore new building on the adjacent open lot.Community ActionCoalition, Inc,

Cl - Grant Housing Initiative Acquire derelict properties in Palmer Park to be rehabbed and sold to $150,000Partnership, Inc, first time homebuyers,

Cl - Grant Hyattsville, City of Improvements to address identified deficiencies pedestrian/non- $110,000motorized/motorized vehicle connectivity 10sustainable transit-oriented development.

CL - Grant North Beach, Installation of wayfinding signage. park benches and trash/recycling S 47,000Town of receptacles in prominent intersections along the commercial area,

CL - Grant Ocean City Purchase a total of three properties with intent to redevelop as $125,000Development workforce housing.Corporation

" .~1


OCTORER 20, 2010

SECRETARY'S AGENDA

14. IlEPARTMEi\"T OF HOUSING ANIl COMMUNITY IlEVELOPMENT (cont'd)Commuuity Legacy I'rogmm - Fiscal Year 201 J

CL - Grant Ocean City Provide a financial incentive to assist downtown businesses with S 50,000Development installing renewable and energy efficient equipmentCorporation

CL. Grant Ocean City To enhance the exterior facades of older buildings in downtown $ 50,000Development Ocean City between the Inlet and 17th StreetCorporation

CL • Granl Park Heights Construct a park adjacent Smart Steps childhood center and will S 50,000Renaissance feature a walking path. a learning landscape, and a sundial garden.

Cl- Grant Pocomoke, City of Inslall a new high efficiency healing distribution system, which will $ 20,000provide immediate and significant energy savings.

Cl - Grant Pocomoke, City of Develop a new downtown mini park and install three new $ 10,000directionalfinformational pedestal signs to assit visitors in locatingdowntown business and attractions.

Cl. Granl Port Towns Commercial facade and capital improvements to assist in the $100,000Community economic and community development of the Port Towns_DevelopmentCom

Cl - Granl Port Towns Addition of two retention ponds to reduce the amount of pollutants $ 55,000Community that enter the storm drain with every heavy rainfalilhat eventuallyDevelopment end in the Chesapeake Bay as well as increase the tree canopy.COrD.

Cl- Grant Princess Anne, This project will pave the service road and parking area for the $100,000Town of Garland Hayward Youth Center, ChanmoorWay and Progress Lane.

Cl- Loan Reinvestment Financing housing and mixed use projects focusing on $175,000Fund, The neighborhoods in East Baltimore.

Cl- Grant Saint Mary's Accessibility improvements as a part of a larger Greenview Village $100,000County Housing Apartments revitalization strategy.Authoritv

CL - Grant Salisbury, City of Repair damage to the foundation and flooring structure consistent $ 75,000with historic restoration guidelines,

CL - Grant Snow Hill, Town Enhance the facades of several commercial buildings in downtown $ 30,000of as part of a broader revitalization plan.

CL. Grant Takoma Park, City Renovation of a long-vacant, historic commercial building at 7328 $ 75,000of Carroll Avenue as headquarters, meeting/program space, and

archives for a local non-profit historical society.CL - Grant Takoma Park, City Revitalize commercial properties and leverage private investment $ 50,000

of throughout the commercial districts,

'. ?~c

20HOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS

OCTOBER 20, 2010

SECRETARY'S AGENDA

14. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING A],(DCOMMUNITY DEVELOI'MENT (cont'd)Commtlllity Legacy Program - Fiscal Year 2011

CL - Grant Taneytown, City Provide banners, benches, business directory sign age, flower pols S 20,000of and historical signage along Main Street.

CL • Grant Thurmont. Town Purchase and restoration of historic building in the Main Street $150,000of area to create a Main Street headquarters to include office space,

community meeting space and avenue for tourism.

CL - Granl Westminster, City Installation of street lights 10continue along Pennsylvania Avenue $150,000of to City limits al Sullivan Avenue.

50 awards for a total $4,250,000

WlTlIOllT DISCUSSION

WITHDRAWNIJEFERREIl

BOARD OF l'UnLle WORKS ACTION: TilE ABOVE REFF:RENCED ITEM WAS:C::ovy IJIS."'PROVED-WITH D1SCI.ISSIOI\'

'JG

21


OCTOBER20, 20 J 0

SECRETARY'S AGEI'.'DA

Contact: Nannan C. Swoboda (410)[email protected]

15. llEI'ARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

RECOl\l:\lENDATION: That the Board of Public Works approve releasing deeds of trust on\0 properties that received loans from DHCD"s Down Payment and Settlement Expense LoanProgram.

LOAN AUTIIORITY:

AUTIIOIUTY TO RELEASESECURITY INTEREST:

Down Payment and Settlement Expense Loan ProgramHousing and Community Development ArticleSS 4.301.4.309, Maryland Code

State Finance and ProcurementArticle SS 10.305, Maryland Code

A. Loan Recipient:

Original Loan:Current Balance:Type:Reason:

Nissan and Gitty Rothenberg6103 Gist Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21215(Baltimore City)$5,000$5,000Second MortgageLoss of income due to unemployment

Remarks: In place of the lien, DHCD will take an unsecured promissory note.

IJ. Loan Recipient:


Crystal S. Adams6708 Ridge Road, #304, Rosedale, MD 21237(Baltimore County)$2,500$2,500Second MortgageLoss of income due to illness

r~cmarks: In place of the lien, DIICD will take an unsecured promissory note.


HOARD OF PUHLIC WORKS

OCTOBER 20, 2010

Sr,CRETAR\"S AGEl\'DA

15. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (conCd)

22

C. Loan Recipients:


Wayne Butler, Jr. and Iicsha Mosby102 Three Coin Way, Glen Burnie, MD 21060(Anne Arundel County)$5,000$5,000Second MortgageLoss of income due to unemployment


D. Loan Recipients:


William M. Colwell, 1114507 Romlon Street, Unit I, Beltsville, MD 20705(Prince George's County)$3,500$3,500Second MortgageLoss of income due to unemployment


E. Loan Recipients:


Uk Liao Sang Niuk and Tial Sung Sui Cia138 Stonegatc Drive, Frederick, MD 21702(Frederick County)$5,000,5,000Second MortgageLoss of income due to unemployment


23


OCTOBER 20, 2010

SECRET AHY'S AGENDA

15. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (cont'd)

F. Loan Recipients:


William G. and Tabitha S. Robinson305 Pine Street, Hurlock, MD 21643(Dorchester County)$5,000$5,000Second MortgageLoss of income due to unemployment


G. Loan Recipienls:


Andrea and Wayne Ruark30008 Donneybrook Lane, Princess Anne, MD 21853(Somerset County)$2,500$2,500Second MortgageLoss of income due to unemployment


H. Loan Recipients:


William D. Smith, Jr. and Jailccn Santos-Diaz329 Sweet Briar Count. Joppa, MD 21085(Harford County)$5.000$5.000Second MortgageMr. Smith had decrease in income and Ms. Santos~Diaz Lost her job

H.cmarks: In place of the lien, DHCD will take an unsecured promissory note.

24IlOARD OF l'UIlLIC WORKS

OCTOBER 20, 2010

SECRETAny'S AGE~DA

15. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING ANIl COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (cont'd)

I. Loan Recipients:


Geneva A. Toms24 East Water Street, Smithburg, MD 21783(Washingtnn County)$5,000$5.000Second MortgageBorrower had excessive repairs resulting in negative monthly income

Remarks: In place of the lien. DileO will take an unsecured promissory note.

1. Loan Recipients:


Erania Torrence6400 Gilmore Street, Gwynn Oak, MD 21207(Baltimore County)$10,000$10,000Second MortgageLoss of income due to furloughs


130,\Rn OF PL:ULlC WORKS ACTIO:".': TilE ABOVE H.[FERENCED ITEM WAS:

'1TH OUT DISCUSSION

CPROVED :::> D1SAPI'ROVED

'\l1T1l DISCUSSION

DI-:HRRED WITHDRAWN

" ~~,

25BOARD OF PUBLIC WOIlKS

October 20, 2010

SECRETARY'S ACENUAContact: Ellen Frketic 410-729-8307

efrkerQ)menv.com

16. MAIlYLANIJ ENVIRONMENTAL SEIlVICERocky Gap Waler TrealmeUl PlulJI

AlE CONTRACT MES Project # 11-05-08Design, bidding & construction services

DESCRIPTIOi\' Design, bidding and construction services to upgrade the water treatmentplant and distribution main serving Rocky Gap State Park.

A\\'All.D

TERM OF CONTIlACT

CONTIlACT AMOUNT

PIlOCUIlE~IENT ~n:TIIOD

MBE PARTICII'ATION

Walek Engineering Corporation, Silver Spring

30 Illonths from notice to proceed

$243,217.00

MES AlE Short List

12%

REMARKS: The existing Rocky Gap WTP is old and the equipment is obsolete. It isbecoming increasingly difficult to obtain repair parts. The existing treatment process does notmeet the current drinking water regulations; MES has been renting temporary treatmentequipment to remain in compliance. Currently, the greatest demand is from the lodge, which issupplied by an aging distribution main running under the lake. With the addition of video gamingfacilities, it is projected the demand for potable water will increase. To have adequate room foran expanded-capacity plant, it will be necessary to relocate to the other side of the lake andabandon the old distribution pipe.

FUI'1l SOUIlCE

AI'I'IHlI'IlIA TlON COI>~:

RESIlJENT BUSINESS

MD TAX CLEARANCE

MCCHL 01'2008: Maryland Environmental ServiceInfrastructure Improvement Fund

432 MCCIlL 08 (PCA #10971)

Yes

]0-5562-0111

nOARIJ OF I'(;HUC WORKS ACTION: TilE ABOVE REFERDiCED ITDI W.

APPROVEn DlSA.PPROVED DEFElmtlJ WITHOR,\W~ .jWITII I)ISCUSSJO~ WITIIOlJT I>ISCUSSJO:'l

28

26


OCTOIlER 20,2010

SECRETARY'S AGE:'\DA

Contact: Marian Honeczy 410/[email protected]

17. DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

RecommeJJt1mioll: The Department of Natural Resources recommends that the Board ofPublic Works approve an amendment to a forest conservation casement that will pemlit theconstruction ofa hikerlbiker trail from the Falls Road Light Rail Station to the Robert Lee Park.

Reference: Reference is made to Secretary's Agenda Item 18 (July 22, 2009) in which the Boardof Public Works approved DNR's acceptance of a forest conservation donation from theMaryland Transit Administration. The casement provides long-term protection for 1.29 acres offorest area located on the falls Road Light Rail Station property in Baltimore County.

Baltimore County is building a hiker/biker trail that will connect the light rail station with RobertLee Park. Because of nontidal wetlands on site, the proposed hikerlbikcr trail has to go throughproperty protected by the forest conservation easement. The Maryland Forest Service has beeninvolved in locating the trail and has marked the few trees that need to be removed.

Forest Consen'ation Plan: #C04-11

Grantor: State of Maryland, to the use of the Maryland Transit Administration, a modal agencyfor the Maryland Department of Transportation

Grantee: State of Maryland to the use of the Department of Natural Resources

Property: 1.29 aeres on the Falls Road Light Rail Station property, Baltimore County

Amcndml'nt: Allow construction of hiker /biker traiL

'1I0UT DISCUSSION

DEt'ERRED WITIIDRA \\'1\

ROARO OF PllBLlC ',,"ORKS ACTION: TItE ABOVE REFERE!'IiCED ITDI WAS:

CPPROY DISAPPROVED

WITII D1SCUSSIO;-""


27BOARIl OF PUBLIC WORKS

OCTOIJER 20, 20 III

SECRETARY'S AGEI'\(M

Contact: Elizabeth Buxton 410-514-7900ebux tonw!unr .statc.md.lls

18. IlF:PARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOIJRCF:SJfllrylal1ll Em';roJlmellla! Trust

Recommeudtlt;,m: That the Board of Public Works approve the following amendment to deed ofconservation easement.

Property:

Grantors:

Gntnlec:

74.2 acres in Frederick County_ Oak Orchard Road. Tax Map 52, Parcel 119 (lots I &2) and Parcel 40.

Beck Properties, LLC

Maryland Environmental Trust

•Hackground: Reference is made 10 Item 8 on the Secretary's Agenda ofOcccmhcr 4, 2002 and

Item 8 on the Secretary's Agenda of Sept em her 21, 2005 in \vhich the Board ofPublic \\'orks ratified the donation 01'1\\'0 conservation easements to the MarylandEnvironmental Trust by LAWRE:"CE: :\1. ,\l\0 DERORAII T. BECK on a combined74.2 acres. The Becks conveyed the property in 2006 to Beck Properties, LLC.Reference is also made to Item 12 of the Secretary's Agenda of November 5, 2008 inwhich the Board of Public Works ratifieu the amended and restated deed ofconservation casement to MET by the current owners, BECK PROI'ERTI[S, LLC.

ProposedAction:

EstimatedValue:

The amendment will: (I) extinguish one reserved development right; (2) add commonownership requirements to all three parcels; and (3) update photos and maps. Theproposed amendment will have a positive affect on the easement by further limitingresidential development and requiring common ownership on the entire property.

SI12,500: Based on a tetter from the Frederick County Department of Assessmentsand Taxation (Jan. 7, 2(05), stating the value of one-acre homesite.

HOAIU> OF PLIHUC WORKS ACTION: Tiff. AROVE REFEREl\CED 11'£.'\1WAS:

,\I'PIU)\'[I> ()ISAI'I'ROVEll DEFERREll W!THORA Wl\

\"'ITII IJISCVSSION WITHOLIT DISCUSSION

:0

•28


OCTOBER 20, 201 0

SECRETARY'S AGE!'iD.<\

Contact: Elizabeth Buxton [email protected],us

19. DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCESMaryland Em'ironmental TrtI~.t

A. Recommendation: That the Board of Public Works approve the following donation of aperpetual conservation casement.

Proper!)":

Grantor:

Grantee:

94.5 acres in Allegany County: Williams Road, Flintstone.

Wilson R.l3artlett and PDtricia A. Bartlett, Trustees orthe RS Realty Trust

Maryland Environmental Trust.

EstimatedValue: $343,507 - Estimated easement value is an MET estimate only. To estimate theeasement value, MET multiplies the number of acres in the proposed easement by the average pcr~acre value of casements MET accepted in that county or region in the previous year. (The previousyear's average per-acre value is derived by totaling the appraised values for MET easements in aregion and dividing by the number of acres).

B. ReclImmemllltiolJ: That the Board of Public Works approve the following donation ofaperpetual conservation casement.

Propert)':

Gralltor:

Grantees:

AppraisedValue:

80.85 acres in Baltimore County: Hess Road, Monkton.

Ellen D. Reeder

Maryland Envirol1lm:ntal Trust and The Manor Conservancy, Inc.

$729,775

MET has recorded conservation easements on 940 acres since January 2010. These actions add175.35 acres to that total.

BOAIW OF PUBLIC WORKS ACTION: TilE ABOVE REFEREJ'liCED ITE:\1 WAS:

("PRonD;:> DISAPPROVED DEFERRED WITI/DRAWN

••WITII lllSCUSSION \'ITIIOUT DISCUSSION

JI

mailto:[email protected],us

29HOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS

OCTOBER 20, 20] 0

SECRETARY'S AGE;'IO()A

Contact: David Lever [email protected]

20. STATE PUBLIC SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMFormer Calvert Jlfiddle Scllool

Recommendatioll: The Interagency Committee on School Construction recommends that theBoard of Public \\forks approve the transfer by the Calvert County Board of Education to theCalvert County Government of the:

Former Cal\'Crt j\.'1iddle School13.6 Acres

Prince Frederick 20678

As a condition of approval, the Calvert County Government shall:

• Retire the $64,869 in outstanding bond debt to which the school \••..a5 subject as ofJuly 6, 2010; and

• Obtain approval from the Board of Public Works before transferring any right,title or interest to any portion orthe facility.

Bacligroulld: Thc Calvcn County Board of Education requests permission to transfer the formerCalvcrt Middle School property, comprising 13.6 acres and building, to the Board of CountyCommissioners of Calvcrt County for public benefit. This property will be pennancntly closedand will not be used for educational purposes. The new Calvcrt Middle School opened inAugust of 20 J 0 to replace the present facility.

Autltori~l': COMAR 23.03.02.23I3. The Interagency Committee on School Construction mustrevie\\' a request to transfcr school property to the local government and make a rccommendationto the Board of Public Works. The Board may approve, disapprove, or conditionally approve,the request to transfer school property. The Interagency Committee reviewed and approved thetransfer on July 9, 2009.

This item was previously submitted as Item 8 on October 6, 20 IO.

HOARn OF PlllJLlC WORKS ACTION: TilE ABOVE REFEREJ\CEU ITEM WAS:

WITHOUT [)ISCUSSIO,~

IHSAPPROVED

\VITIJ I)ISCUSSIO~

[)EFEltRF.[) WITJI[)RAWl"

J2


30SUJ)I)t[,\IF:~TAL


OCTOHEI< 20, 20 I0

SECRET,\RY'S AGE.:\D..\

Contact: Len Foxwell 410-260-7734Ifox\[email protected]

21. COMPTROLLERRel{ister.\' of Will.'!

Recommem/atioll: That the Board of Public Works continue the salaries for the Registers ofWills at their current amounts as indicated on next page, to become effective at the beginning oftheir new terms of office.

Background: The Board of Public Works must establish the annual salary of eachRegister of Wills on the basis of county population. total fees and taxes collected, and otherpertinent data that indicate the reasonableness of the salary in relation to the work done. Section2-205. Estates and Trusts Article, Maryland Code. The maximum salary that may be paid to aRegister was not increased by the General Assembly during the current term of office andremains set at S98.500.

BOARl>OF PLiBlIC wonKS ,\CTIO:\: TilE ,\HOVE nEFEnE"'CED ITD1 W'\S:

ITIIOLJT IHSClJSSIO:\

,.:J3

\\/ITIII>RAWI\UEFERIU:DI>lSAI'I'ROVEU

WITH l>ISCUSSION

SECRETARY'S AGEl'o'IM,ITEI\I21

ATTACHMENT

REGISTERS OF WILLS2010-2014 Salary Proposal

Current Proposed.Jurisdiction Salary Salary

Caroline 86,100 86,100Garrett 86,100 86,100Kent 86,100 86,100Somerset 86,100 86,100Allegany 90,700 90.700Calvert 90,700 90.700Cecil 90.700 90,700Dorchester 90.700 90,700Queen Anne's 90,700 90,700St. Mary's 90.700 90,700Talbot 90,700 90,700Wicomico 90.700 90,700Worcester 90.700 90,700Carroll 93,900 93,900Charles 93,900 93,900Frederick 93,900 93,900Harford 93,900 93,900Howard 93,900 93,900Washington 93,900 93,900Anne Arundel 98,500 98,500Baltimore 98.500 98,500Baltimore City 98.500 98,500Montgomery 98,500 98,500Prince George's 98,500 98,500

31(SUPPLEl\IENTi\L)

10/20/10

32(slil'PLnIE~TAL)


OCTOBER 20, 2010

SECRETARY'S AGENDA

Contact: Frank Broccolina 410-260-1295Frank. Brocco Iina '/7)(;0ufts. state. Old. us

22. CLERKS OF TIlE CIRCUIT COURT

Recommendation: By the Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals and the State CourtAdministrator that the Board of Public Works continue the salaries of the Clerks of the twenty-four Circuit Courts as indicated on next page, to become effective at the beginning of their newterms of otlice for the duration of the new term.

Background: Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article S 2-504(a) states that the "c1erkof each circuit court shall receive an annual salary of not more than $98,500 as set by the Boardof Public Works on the basis of the relative volume of business and receipts in the clerk"sollicc:" The maximum salary that may be paid to a Clerk was not increased by the GeneralAssembly during the current tcrm of officc and remains set at $98.500. Pursuant to MarylandConstitution Article III, 935, like other clected State oflicials, Clerk of Court salaries only mayincrease every four years upon each election.

BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS ACTIO:\': TilE ABOVE REFt:RE:\CED ITE:\I ,VAS:

'ITIIOUT U1SClJSSIO:".'

'VITIIDRAWi\DEFERREDDISAPPROVED

WITTI DISCUSSION

,\PPROVEI)

;'5

33(SliPPLEI\1ENT Al.)

SECRETARY'S AGE:'IDA, ITEM 22 10/20/10ATTACHMENT

Subdivision Current Salary Proposed Salary2006-2010 1010-2014

Caroline 92,600 92,600

Dorchester 92,600 92,600

Garrett 92,600 92,600

Kent 92,600 92,600

Queen Anne's 92,600 92,600

Somerset 92,600 92,600

Talbot 92,600 92,600

Allegany 95,600 95,600

Calvert 95,600 95,600

Cecil 95,600 95,600

St. Mary's 95,600 95,600

Wicomico 95,600 95,600

Worcester 95,600 95,600

Carroll 96,750 96,750

Frederick 96,750 96,750

Washington 96,750 96,750

Charles 96,750 96,750

Harford 96,750 96,750

Howard 96,750 96,750

Anne Arundel 98,500 98,500

Baltimore County 98,500 98,500

Montgomery 98,500 98,500

Prince George's 98,500 98,500

Baltimore City 98,500 98,500J6


OCTOBER20, 2010

SECRETARY'S AGENDA

APPENDIX

Report of emergency contracts awarded by various agencies in accordance with COMAR21.05.06 (Title 21 - State Procurement Regulations) and reported in accordance with COMAR21.02.01.05(A)(3).

Individual reports enclosed.

AIBOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS

OCTOBER 20, 2010

ApPEi"iDiX

SECRETARY'S AGEi"iDA

Contact: Jane Bailey [email protected]

RF:POllT OF EMF:RGF:NCY PROCURF:MENT

ITE~I: Appendix 1

DEPARTMF:NT OF MARYLAND STATF: POLlCF:A ~'ialio" Command FacilityAudrew~'Air Force Rase, Trooper 2

CONTRACT: Design New Above.Ground Fuel TankADPICS NO.: 00lBI400257PROJECT NO.: PR-250-110-001

DESCRIPTION: Design new above-ground fuel tanks and remove existing undergroundtanks, including all piping and dispensing system.

PROCUREMF:i'iT METHOD:

DATE EMERGF:NCY DECLARED:

11IDS:

URS Corporation,lIunt Valley, Md.

A\\'ARD:

AMOUi'iT:

CONTRACT AWARD DATE:

TERM:

~1IlF: PARTICIPATION:

Emergency

July 2, 2010

$68,333.00

URS Corporation

$68,333.00

August 20, 20 I0

Six Weeks

16%

J8


A2BOARD OF rUBLlC WORKS

OCTOBER 20, 2010

ArPEl'WIX

SECRETARY'S AGENDA

RErORT OF D'IERGENCY rROCUREMENT

ITEM: Appendix I (cont'd)

FUNDS SOURCE: MCCBL2008Item 010 -Provide fund, for the State CapitalFacilities Renewal Program

REMARKS:Nature of Emergency: The two existing underground storage tanks located at the Maryland StatePolice Aviation Command facility at Andrews Air Force Base (Trooper 2), have been cited byregulatory agencies, are out of service, and need immediate replacement.

Basis/or Selection: URS has experience designing aviation fueling systems.

TAX COMrLIANCE NO.:

RESIDENT BUSINESS:

BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS ACTION:

10-5519-1111

Yes

REPORT ACCEPTEI> wnll DISCUSSION WITHOUT DJSCUSSIO""

REPORTED RI':J\1A:'riI>EUTO DEPT.1AGENCY

RE.\tARh:S:

A3BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS

OCTOBER 20, 2010

ApPEl\DlX

SECRETARY'S AGENDA

Contact: Jane Bailey 410-767-4307Janc. [email protected]

REPORT OF EMERGENCY PROCUREMENT

ITEM: Appendix 2

MARYLAND STATE POLICE

CONTRACT: Replace Electrical TransformerADPlCS NO.: 00lB1400262PROJECT NO.: PZ-OOO-IIO-OOI

DESCRIPTION: Remove existing failed transformer; supply, install, and test a newtransformer; and perform all maintenance on existing oil switch and install ncw oil.

PROCUREMENT METHOD:

DATE EMERGENCY DECLARED:

IlIIJS:

MET Electrical Testing, LLCBaltimore, Maryland

AWARD:

A~10UNT:

CONTRACT AWARD DATE:

TERM:

MBE PARTlCII'ATION:

Emergency

September 9, 2010

$89,900.00

MET Electrical Testing, LLC

$89,900.00

September 9, 2010

30 Days

0%

FUND SOURCE: MCCI3L 2009 Item 007 - Capital Facilities Renewal

~o


A4BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS

OCTORER 20, 2010

ApPE~D1:X

SECRET AR.Y'S AGEI\IM

IlEPORT OF EMERGENCY PROCUREMENT

ITEM: Appendix 2 (cont'd)

•

REMARKS:,\Iafure of Emergency: Four electrical transformers serve the State Police Executive Building\,vhich houses the Executive Department of the MSP. the computer system that operates theMaryland Homeland Security system, and various programs. On September 9, 2010, one orthefour transfonncrs overheated due to loss of oil. Overheating will cause the transformer to failand loss of electrical service. Immediate service was needed and the transformer was shutdown.Contractor provided a bypass electrical backup for the homeland security and computer systems.Executive stalTwas relocated 10 offices on site. Contractor located a new transformer andinstalled it.

Basisfor Selection: This contractor has performed ' •...ark on site and is familiar with the system,providing the State with minimal downtime on the system.

TAX COMPLIANCE NO.: 10-5518-0000

RESIIJENT BUSINESS: Yes

BOARD OF PlJBLlC WORKS "eTlON:

REPORTED REJ\.lA:"iDEn TO DEPT.lAGE;\CY

WITHOUT DISCUSSIO:"i'\'IT" DISCUSSIO]\,REPORT ACCEl'TEIJ

REMARKS:

41

Page IAPIWGRAM OPEN SPACE AGENDA - SUPPLEMENT A


OCTOBER 211,2010

SECRETARY'S AGE:"\DA

ITEM IAPROGRAM OPEN SPACE LOCAL SHARE:

Contact: James \V. [email protected](410) 260-8426

Approval is requested to commit S I 0,000.00 for the following development project located inGarrett Count}'. Funding will come from the Program Open Space Local Share that is allocated tothe County.

Garrett Countv Trail Den'lopmeR. Phase I - SIO,OOlJ.Oll - pas #5843-II-Ui8MD201011817-11850Determine the general alignment and design of proposed county trails that would connect to theGreat Allegany Highlands Trail (The Great Allegheny Passage). Program Open Space funds will beutilized along with other sources to prepare easements, maps, and construction documents. Thisproject also includes a bridge design study for a proposed bridge across the Youghiogheny River nearFriendsville. The design of the trail will incorporate existing county trails and identify the bestconnection with the popular trail that connects Washington D.C. with the city of Pittsburgh.

FUND SOURCE: Program 81.20.04 Item 811 $10,000.00

Without Discussion42

Withdra\VIlDeferred

Board OfPuhlic Works Action: The Above Referenced Item Was:

CAPproved:> Disapproved2

With Discussion


APROGRAM OPEN SPACE AGENDA - SUPPLEMENT A

BOARll OF PUBLIC WORKS

OCTOBER 20, 2010

SECRETARY'S AGI-:~DA

James W. Price (410) [email protected]

Contact:ITEM 2ACOMMUNITY PARKS AND PLAYGROUNDS PROGRAM:MAR YLAND CONSOLIDA TED CAPITAL BOND LOAN OF 2010:

Approval is requested to commit $60,000.00 for the following development project located inthe Town of Poolesville, Montgomery County. Funding will come from the Community Parks andPlaygrounds Program's MeeHL proceeds as noted.

Parcel 840 Tot Lot - S60,OOO.OO- CPP #5820-15-647 - MD20101004-0948Construct a tal lot to provide open space and park facilities adequate to serve the needs of theTown's residents.

FUND SOURCE: MeeHL of 20 10: Community Parks and Playgrounds Program,Montgomery CountyProgram 89.22.49 Item 053 $60,000.00

Board Of Public Works Action: The Above Referenced Item Was:

crove~ Disapproved Deferred Withdrawn

With Discussion ithout Discussion

43


Contact: James W. Price (410) [email protected]

Page 3APROGRAM OPEN SPACE AGENDA - SUPPLEMENT A


OCTOBER 20, 20 I 0

SECRETARY'S AGE:";llA

ITEM3APROGRAM OPEN SPACE LOCAL SHARE:MARYLAND CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL BOND LOAN OF 2010:

Approval is requested to commit $335,961.00 for the following development projects located in\Vashington County. funding \vill come from the Program Open Space Local Share that isallocated to the County and MeeHL proceeds as noted.

1. nevil's Backhone Park Dam Repair - 5240,000.00 - POS #5192-21-210MD20070925-I002Repair the dam that was built in the mid to late 1800's and is the centerpiece of the park. Due10 the dam's age and recent State inspections, it has been determined that the dam is a safetyhazard. Funds totaling S 180,000.00 were previously appro\'ed by the Board of Public Workson the Secretary's Agenda.

FUND SOURCE: Program 81.20.04 Item 921 $240,000.00

2. Williamsport High School Tn,ck Facility Upgrade - S95,96UIO - pas #5261-21-218M020071115-1137Resurface the existing running track and runway approach facilities for the long jump, highjump, pole vault, and triple jump pits. Funds totaling $46,900.00 were previously approvedby the Hoard of Public Works on the Secretary's Agenda.

FUND SOURCE: MCCBL 01'2010: Program Open Space, Local Capital Developmentand Land Acquisition Grants, Washington CountyProgram 89.22.49 Item 056 $95,961.00


CAPPro:Y Disapproved Deferred Withdrawn

With Discussion Without Discussion




OCTOBER 20, 2010

SECRETARY'S ACE:\'DA

Meredith Lathbury [email protected]

Contact:ITEM 4ARURAL LEGACY PROGRAM FUNDS:MARYLAND CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL HOND LOAN OF 2009:MARYLAND CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL HOND LOAN OF 2010:

Approval is requested to grant to Worcester County $382,606.78 for the following project from RuralLegacy Funds.

PROJECT NAME: Coastal Bays Rural Legacy Area

BACKGROUND: The Board of Public Works authorized a $500,000 FY 2009 grant on theJanuary 7, 2009 Program Open Space Agenda Item lOA and a $1,000,000 FY 2010 grant on theDecember 16, 2009 Program Open Space Agenda Item lOA for easement acquisitions in WorcesterCounty.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:McCabe's Cornu Properties, LLC - S382,606.78Acquisition of this 149.51 acre conservation easement located in the Coastal Bays Rural Legacy Areawill protect valuable agricultural and forestlands, and implement significant water quality protectionmeasures in the Chincoteague Bay Watershed. This easement will be held by the CountyCommissioners of Worcester County.

VALUE OF EASEMENT: Total easement value $358,584.00 - $2,398.40 per acre.

TOTAL OTHER COSTS:Administrative:Incidental:

Compliance:

$24,022.78$10,757.52$ 7,886.50

$1,216.50 - Settlement fees$6,275.00 - Appraisals$ 395.00 - Title Work

$5,378.76

AMOUNT REQUESTED: $382,606.78

FUND SOURCE: MCCHL2010MCCBL2009RLP 2009

89.22.4989.22.4581.20.04

Item 054Item 062Item 025

$250,000.00$108,584.00$ 24,022.78

Without Discussion

Deferred

Board Of Public Works Action: The Above Referenced Item Was:cproved> Disapproved

With Discussion

Withdrawn

45




OCTOBER 20, 2010

SECRETARY'S ACE:'IinA

ITEM 5A Contact: Meredith Lathbury 410-260-8450RURAL LEGACY PROGRAM FUNDS: [email protected] CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL BOND LOAN OF 2009:

Approval is requested to grant to Worcester County $82,760.75 for the following project fromRural Legacy Funds.

PROJECT NAME: Coastal Bays Rural Legacy Area

BACKGROUND: The Board of Public Works authorized a $500,000 FY 2009 grant onthe January 7, 2009 Program Open Space Agenda Item 10/\ for easement acquisitions in WorcesterCounty.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Rurallntegritv Land, LLC - $82,760.75Acquisition of this 19.55 acre conservation casement located in the Coastal Bays Rural LegacyArea will protect valuable agricultural and forest lands, and implement significant water qualityprotection measures in the Chincoteague Bay Watershed. This easement will be held by the CountyCommissioners of Worcester County.

VALUE OF EASEMENT:


Compliance:

AMOUNT REQUESTED:

Total easement value $71,650.00 - $3,664.96 per acre.

$11,110.75$2,149.50. $7,886.50

$1 ,216.50 ~ Settlement fees$6,275.00 - Appraisals$ 395.00 - Title Work

$t ,074.75

$82,760.75

FUND SOURCE: MCCHL 200989.22.45RLP 2009 81.20.04

Item 062Item 025

$71,650.00$11,110.75


CXpprovedJ Disapproved Deferred Withdra\Vl1

With Discussion C'ithuut Discussion ~

46




OCTOBER 20, 2010

SECRETARY'S AGEl\D:\

Meredith Lathbury 410-260-8450mlath bUI\:@dnr.state.md.us

Contact:ITEM 6ARURAL LEGACY PROGRAM FUNDS:MARYLAND CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL BOND LOAN OF 2010:

Approval is requested to grant to The Nature Conservancy $186,923.26 for the following projectsfrom Rural Legacy Funds amI MCeHL proceeds as noted.

PROJECT NAME: Dividing Creek Rural Legacy Area

BACKGROUND: The Board of Public Works authorized a $1 ,000,000 FY 2009 Grant foreasement acquisitions in Worcester and Somerset Counties for the Dividing Creek Rural Legacy Area onthe January 7, 2009 Program Open Space Agenda Item IDA and a $500,000 FY 2010 Grant on theDecember 16, 2009 Program Open Space Agenda Item lOA.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Glad Mar Dairy Land (om Dan", Inc. - SI86,923.26Acquisition of this 134.44 acre conservation casement located in the Dividing Creek Rural Legacy Areaof Worcester County preserves agricultural and forest land. The easement will be held by The Lov,'erShore Land Trust and the Maryland Department of Natural Resources, and the United States of America,Department of Agriculture.

VALUE OF EASEMENT: Total easement value $323,328.00 - $2,405.00 per acre (The USDA iscontributing $157,500.00 through the Farm and Ranchland Protection Program.)


Compliance:

$ 21,095.26$ 9,699.84$ 6,545.50

$1,216.50 - Settlement fees$ 2,350.00 - Appraisals$ 2,700.00 - Survey$ 279.00 - Title Work

$ 4,849.92

TOTAL COST: $186,923.26

FUND SOURCE: MCCHL 2010RLP 2009

89.22.4981.20.04

Item 054Item 025

$165,828.00$ 21,095.26


~provey Disapproved Deferred Withdrawn

L.-- With Discussion C ve Ithou~DiSCUSSIOn>

47



OCTOBER 20, 20 10

SECI{ETARY'S AGENUA

Meredith Lathbury 410-260-8450In lath btl [email protected].!TId.us

Contact:ITEM 7ARURAL LEGACY PROGRAM FUNDS:MARYLAND CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL BOND LOAN OF 2009:MARYLAND CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL BOND LOAN OF 2010:

Approval is requested to grant to The Nature Conservancy $276, )49.16 for the following projectsfrom Rural Legacy Funds and MCCBL proceeds as noted.

PROJECT NAME: Dividing Creek Rural Legacy Area

BACKGROUND: The Board of Public Works authorized a $1 ,000,000 FY 2009 Grant forcasement acquisitions in Worcester and Somerset Counties for the Dividing Creek Rural Legacy Area onthe January 7, 2009 Program Open Space Agenda Item IDA and a $500,000 FY 2010 Grant on theDecember 16, 2009 Program Open Space Agenda Item IOJ\.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Nelson Farm - $276,1.49.16Acquisition of this 195.75 acre conservation casement located in the Dividing Creek Rural Legacy Areaof Somerset County preserves agricultural and forest land. The casement will be held by The LO\verShore Land Trust and the Maryland Department of Natural Resources, and the United States of America,Department of Agriculture.

VALUE OF EASEMENT: Total easement value $452,182.50 - $2,310.00 per acre (The USDA iscontributing $210,000.00 through the Farm and Ranchland Protection Program.)


Compliance:

TOTAL COST:

$ 33,966.66$13,565.47$13,6]8.45

$2,634.00 - Settlement fees$3,050.00 - Appraisals$4,300.00 - Survey$1,564.45 - Title Work$1,975.00 - Environmental Assessment$ 95.00 - Recording Fee)

S 6,782.74

$276,149.16

FUND SOURCE: MCCBL2009MCCBL2010RLP 2009

89.22.4589.22.4981.20.04

Item 062Item 054Item 025

$214,331.50$ 27,851.00$ 33,966.66

Board Of Public Works Action: The Above Referenced Item Was:CProved> Disapproved Deferred Withdrawn

- With Discussion CWithO: Discussion ~

48

mailto:[email protected].!TId.us



OCTOBER 20, 2010

SECRETARY'S AGENDA

Meredith Lathbury 41O~260-8450!nlath [email protected]

Contact:ITEM 8ARURAL LEGACY PROGRAM FUNDS,MARYLAND CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL BOND LOAN OF 2009,

Approval is requested to grant 10 the Washington County $138,465.00 for the following project fromRural Legacy Funds.

PROJECT NAME: Mid-Maryland Washington Rural Legacy Area

BACKGROUND: The Board of Pub tic Works authorized a $1.000,000 FY 2010 Grant forcasement acquisitions in Washington County for the Mid-Maryland Washington Rural Legacy Area onthe December 16, 2009 Program Open Space Agenda Item lOA.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION,lIirrlinger Propert" - S138,465.00Acquisition of this 39.S-acre conservation easement located in the Mid-Maryland Washington RuralLegacy Area of Washington County preserves historically significant property atop a forested hillock, andeliminates three (3) development rights. Watcr quality will be protcctcd through permanent riparianbuffers of streams feeding directly into the Potomac River, a major tributary of the Chesapeake Bay. Thceascmcnt will be held by Washington County.

VALUE OF EASEMENT, Total easement vallie $131,431.12 - $3,302.29 per acre

TOTAL OTHER COSTS,Administrative:Incidental:

Compliance:

$ 7,033.88$3,942.93$1,119.48

$ 100.00 - Closing fee$ 350.00 - Title Search$ 156.00 - Title Abstract$ 513.48-Titlc Insurance

$1,971.47

AMOUNT REQUESTED, SI38,465.00

FUND SOURCE,MCCBL 2009 89.22.45

RLP 2009Item 062

81.20.04 Item 025$131,431.12

$ 7,033.88

Without Discussion

Deferred


Cprovy J);sapproved

With Discussion

Withdrawn

43


A(REVISED)

PROGRAM OPEN SPACE - SUPPLEMENT A


October 20, 2010

Secretal1"S Agenda

ITEM 9APROGRAM OPEN SPACE (CREP) FUNDS:SPECIAL OPPORTUNITY BOND LOAN OF 2009:

Contact: Meredith [email protected]

Approval is requested to grant to Washington County $58,737.53 for the following project from ProgramOpen Space (POS) Stateside Funds.

PROJECT NAME:

BACKGROUND:

Heimer Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (CREP) easement,Washington County.

The Board of Public Works approved the CREP easement acquisitionprogram on September 16, 2009 Program Open Space Agenda Item 9Aand authorized the use of bond funds issued under the Program OpenSpace Land Acquisition Opportunity Loan Act of2009 to be used foracquiring pennanent conservation easements on stream side forests,natural areas and \••..etlands as set forth in the Revision to the AgreememBetween the u.s. Department 0/Agriculture, the Commodity CreditCorporation, and the State o/Maryland Concerning the Implementationo/the Alaryland Consen'ation Resen'e Enhancement Program datedApril 24, 2009. The land targeted for CREP easements meets the specialbond requirements because it has extraordinary ecological value and willhelp provide clean air, clean water and wildlife habitat.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Heimer CREP Easement - $58,737.53Acquisition of this 16.98-acre CREP easement located in Washington County pennanently protects waterquality through riparian buffers along) ,445 feet of Antietam Creek, a Class 4 trout stream feeding into thePotomac River, a major tributary of the Chesapeake Bay. The property on which this easement is locatedwas utilized by the Confederate Anny during their retreat from Gettysburg. it may also have been used bythe Confederacy during the Battles of Antietam and South Mountain for medical evacuation andhospitalization. The ea'iement will be co-held by Washington County and the Department of NaturalResources.

VAWE OF EASEMENT:

TOTAL OTHER COSTS:

ADMINISTRATIVE:INCIDENTAL:COMPLIANCE:

AMOUNT REQUESTED:

Total easement value $53,070.31 - $3,125.46 per acre

$ 5,667.22

$1,592.11$3,279.06

$ 796.05

$58,737.53 so


Page IDA(REVISED)



October 20, 2010

Secretary's Agenda

ITEM 9A (con't)

CREP TargetingThe CREP easement program focuses its etTons on "Target Level I" and "Target Level 2" counties wherethe easement practices will have the greatest impact on water quality. Targeting for CREP was amultiagency and conservation partnership organization effort that utilized nine high priority, science based,data sets and areas of special consideration developed from the past 10 years of research and study of waterquality and natural resource conditions in the State's 134 watersheds. Washington County is a TargetLevel 2 county.

Easement Valuation SystemDNR uses an easement evaluation system based on (I) whetherthe property is located within a "TargetLevell" or "Target Level 2" county; (2) the width of the buffers and (3) the amount ofland in the CREPcontract that will be covered by the easement. The program seeks to retain conservation practices beyondthe 10- to 15-year contract period available under the federal CREP rental program. The easementacquires development rights and a portion of the agricultural production value beginning at the end of thefederal contract tenn and continuing into perpetuity.

FUND SOURCE: Progcam81.20.03 Item447 $ 5,667.22 (FY 2010)

Special Opportunity Bond Loan of2009Program89.22.45 Item500 $53,070.31 (FY 2010)

REMARKS:1. This project meets criteria in accordance with Chapter 419, Laws of Maryland 2009 as it presents a

unique acquisition opportunity as a result of the extraordinary location and environmental value of theproperty.

2. The Governor has requested thai the Board of Public Works borrow money and incur specialobligation indebtedness through a special loan to be knovm as the Program Open Space AcquisitionOpportunity Loan of2009 as provided in Chapter 419 of the Laws of Maryland 2009.

3. This action authorizes the Comptroller to establish a spending authorization and advance funds neededto complete the transaction; requesting the use of bonds authorized under the Program Open SpaceAcquisition Opportunity Loan of2009.

Deferred

Board of Public Works Action: the above referenced item was

C'proveQ Disapproved

With Discussion

Withdrawn

Without Discussion

51

Page IIA(REVISED)



October 20, 2010

Secretary's Agenda

ITEM lOAPROGRAM OPEN SPACE (CREP) FUNDS:SPECIAL OPPORTUNITY BOND LOAN OF 2009:


Approval is requested to grant to Washington County $230,722.68 for the following project from ProgramOpen Space (POS) Stateside Funds.

PROJECT NAME:

BACKGROUND:

Schooley Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (CREP)easement, Washington County.

The Board of Public Works approved the CREP easement acquisitionprogram on September 16, 2009 Program Open Space Agenda Item 9Aand authorized the use of bond funds issued under the Program OpenSpace Land Acquisition Opportunity Loan Act of2009 to be used foracquiring permanent conservation easements on stream side forests.natural areas and wetlands as set forth in the Revision to the AgreementBetween the u.s. Department of Agriculture. the Commodity CreditCorporation. and the State of Maryland Concerning the Implementationof the Maryland Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program datedApril 24, 2009. The land targeted for CREP easements meets the specialbond requirements because it has extraordinary ecological value and willhelp provide clean air, clean water and wildlife habitat.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:SchooleY CREP Easement - $230,722.68Acquisition ofthis 60.1 I-acre CREP easement located in Washington County permanently protects waterquality through riparian buffers along 1,I00 feet of Antietam Creek. a Class 4 trout stream feeding into thePotomac River, a major tributary of the Chesapeake Bay. The easement will be co-held by WashingtonCounty and the Department of Natural Resources.

VAWE OF EASEMENT:

TOTAL OTHER COSTS:


AMOUNT REOUESTED:

Total easement value $216,774.69 - $3,606.30 per acre

$ 13,947.99

$6,503.24$4,193.13

$ 3,251.62

$230,722.68

52


A(REVISED)



October 20, 2010

Secretary's Agenda

ITEM lOA (con't)

eREP TargetingThe eREP easement program focuses its efforts on "Target Level I" and "Target Level 2" counties wherethe easement practices will have the greatest impact on water quality. Targeting for CREP was amultiagency and conservation partnership organization effort that utilized nine high priority, science based,data sets and areas of special consideration developed from the past 10 years of research and study of waterquality and natural resource conditions in the State's 134 watersheds. Washington County is a TargetLevel 2 county.

Easement Valuation SystemDNR uses an easement evaluation system based on (I) whether the property is located within a "TargetLevel I" or ';Target Level 2" county; (2) the width of the buffers and (3) the amount of land in the eREPcontract that will be covered by the easement. The program seeks to retain conservation practices beyondthe IO~to 15.year contract period available under the federal CREP rental program, The easementacquires development rights and a portion of the agricultural production value beginning at the end of thefederal contract tenn and continuing into perpetuity.

FUND SOURCE: Program 81.20.03 Item 447 $ 13,947.99 (FY 2010)

Special Opportunity Bond Loan of 2009Program 89.22.4; Item ;00 $216,774.69 (FY 2010)

REMARKS:I. This project meets criteria in accordance with Chapter 419, Laws of Maryland 2009 as it presents a


2, The Governor has requested that the Board of Public Works borrow money and incur specialobligation indebtedness through a special loan to be known as the Program Open Space AcquisitionOpportunity Loan of2009 as provided in Chapter 419 of the Laws of Maryland 2009,

3. This action authorizes the Comptroller to establish a spending authorization and advance funds neededto complete the transaction; requesting the use of bonds authorized under the Program Open SpaceAcquisition Opportunity Loan of2009,


('AppmvedJ Disappmved Deferred Withdrawn

With Discussion Without Discussion

53

A(REVISED)



October 20, 2010

Secretary's Agenda

ITEM IIAPROGRAM OPEN SPACE (CREP) FUNDS:SPECIAL OPPORTUNITY BOND LOAN OF 2009:


Approval is requested to grant to Frederick County $98,059.75 for the following project from ProgramOpen Space (POS) Stateside Funds.

PROJECT NAME:

BACKGROUND:

Pickert. Kimberly Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (CREP)easement, Frederick County.

The Board of Public Works approved the CREP easement acquisitionprogram on September 16,2009 Program Open Space Agenda Item 9Aand authorized the use of bond funds issued under the Program OpenSpace Land Acquisition Opportunity Loan Act of2009 to be used foracquiring permanent conservation easements on stream side forests,natural areas and wetlands as set forth in the Revision to the AgreementBetv.'een the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the Commodity CreditCorporation. and the State of Maryland Concerning the Implementationof the Maryland Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program datedApril 24, 2009. The land targeted for CREP easements meets the specialbond requirements because it has extraordinary ecological value and willhelp provide clean air, clean water and wildlife habitat.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Pickert, Kimberly eREP Easement - $98,059.75Acquisition of this 16.1234-acre CREP easemenllocated in Frederick County permanently protects waterquality through riparian buffers along 1,500 feet of Beaver Branch Creek, a tributary of Owens Creek, aUse JIJ P Natural Trout Stream and also a source of public water. The easement will be co-held byFrederick County and the Department of Natural Resources.

VALUE OF EASEMENT:

TOTAL OTHER COSTS:


AMOUNT REQUESTED:

Total easement value $92,064.61 - $5,710 per acre

$ 5,995.14

$2,761.93$3,233.21

$ 0 (County paying)

$98,059.75


A(REVISED)



October 20, 2010

Secretary's Agenda

ITEM IIA (con't)

eREP TargetingThe CREP easement program focuses its efforts on "Target Level I" and "Target Level 2" counties wherethe easement practices will have the greatest impact on water quality. Targeting for eREP was amultiagency and conservation partnership organization effort that utilized nine high priority, science based,data sets and areas of special consideration developed from the past 10 years of research and study of waterquality and natural resource conditions in the State"s 134 watersheds. Frederick County is a Target LevelI county.

Easement Valuation SystemDNR uses an easement evaluation system based on (I) whether the property is located within a "TargetLevel I" or "Target Level 2'" county: (2) the width of the buffers and (3) the amount ofland in the CREPcontract that will be covered by the easement. The program seeks to retain conservation practices beyondthe lO- to IS-year contract period available under the federal CREP rental program. The easementacquires development rights and a portion of the agricultural production value beginning at the end of thefederal contract ternl and continuing into perpetuity.

FUND SOURCE: Program81.20.03 ltem447 $ 5,995.14 (FY20JO)

Special Opportunity Bond Loan of2009Program 89.22.45 Item 500 $92,064.61 (FY 2010)

REMARKS:I. This project meets criteria in accordance with Chapter 419, Laws of Mat)'land 2009 as it presents a


2. The Governor has requested thai (he Board of Public Works borrow money and incur specialobligation indebtedness through a special loan to be knovm as the Program Open Space AcquisitionOpportunity Loan of2009 as provided in Chapter 419 of the Laws of Maryland 2009.

3. This action authorizes the Comptroller to establish a spending authorization and advance funds neededto complete the transaction: requesting the use of bonds authorized under the Program Open SpaceAcquisition Opportunity Loan of2009.


CAPpro:y Disapproved Deferred Withdrawn

, With Discussion Without Discussion

A(REVISED)



October 20, 2010

Secretary's Agenda

ITEM 12APROGRAM OPEN SPACE (CREP) FUNDS,SPECIAL OPPORTUNITY BOND LOAN OF 2009,

Contact: Meredith Lathbul)'[email protected] I0-260-8450

Approval is requested to grant to Frederick County $203,011.43 for the following project from ProgramOpen Space (POS) Stateside Funds.

PROJECT NAME,

BACKGROUND,

Pickert, Steven Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (CREP)easement, Frederick County.

The Board of Public Works approved the eREP easement acquisitionprogram on September 16,2009 Program Open Space Agenda Item 9Aand authorized the use of bond funds issued under the Program OpenSpace Land Acquisition Opportunity Loan Act of2009 to be used foracquiring permanent conservation easements on stream side forests.natural areas and wetlands as set forth in the Revision to the AgreementBetween the u.s. Department of Agriculture, the Commodity CreditCorporation, and the State o.fMaryland Concerning the Implementationof the Maryland Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program datedApril 24, 2009. The land targeted for CREP easements meets the specialbond requirements because it has extraordinary ecological value and willhelp provide clean air, clean water and wildlife habitat.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION,Pickert, Ste"'en CREP Easement - S203,011.43Acquisition of this 33.9685.acre CREP easement located in Frederick County permanently protects waterquality through riparian buffers along 3,622 feet of Beaver Branch Creek. a tributary of Owens Creek. aUse III P Natural Trout stream and also a source of public water. The easement will be c<rheld byFrederick County and the Department of Natural Resources.

VALUE OF EASEMENT,

TOTAL OTHER COSTS,

ADMINISTRA TlVE:INCIDENTAL,COMPLIANCE:

AMOUNT REQUESTED:

Total easement value $193,960.14 - $5,710 per acre

$ 9,051.29

$5,818.07$3,233.22

$ 0 (County paying)

$203,011.43

56


A(REVISED)



October 20, 2010

Secretar)"s Agenda

ITEM 12A (con't)

CRE? TargetingThe CREP easement program focuses its efforts on "Target Levell" and "Target Level 2" counties wherethe easement practices will have the greatest impact on water quality. Targeting for CREP was amultiagency and conservation partnership organization effort that utilized nine high priority, science based.data sets and areas of special consideration developed from the past 10 years of research and study of waterquality and natural resource conditions in the State's 134 watersheds. Frederick County is a Target LevelI county.

Easement Valuation SvstemDNR uses an easement evaluation system based on (I) whether the property is located within a ;'TargetLevell" or "Target Level 2" county; (2) the width of the buffers and (3) the amount of land in the CREPcontract that will be covered by the easement. The program seeks to retain conservation practices beyondthe 10- to I5-year contract period available under the federal CREP rental program. The easementacquires development rights and a portion of the agricultural production value beginning at the end of thefederal contract tenn and continuing into perpetuity.

FUND SOURCE: Program81.20,03 Item447 $ 9,051.29 (FY 2010)

Special Opportunity Bond Loan of2009Program89.22-45 Item500 $193,960.14 (FY 2010)

Withdrawn

REMARKS:1. This project meets criteria in accordance \•...ith Chapter 419, Laws of Maryland 2009 as it presents a


2. The Governor has requested that the Board of Public Works borrow money and incur specialobligation indebtedness through a special loan to be known as the Program Open Space AcquisitionOpportunity Loan of2009 as provided in Chapter 419 of the Laws of Maryland 2009.

3. This action authorizes the Comptroller to establish a spending authorization and advance funds neededto complete the transaction; requesting the use of bonds authorized under the Program Open SpaceAcquisition Opportunity Loan of2009.


&rovV Disapproved Deferred

ZL With Discussion Without Discussion

57

1BBPW 10/20/2010

SUPPLEMENT BDEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT

ACTION AGENDA

SERVICES CONTRACT

ITEM: 1-S Agency Contact: Sandra [email protected]

DEPARTMENTIPROGRAM:

CONTRACT 10:

Human Resources (DHR)Local Departments of Social Services OperationsResidential Child Care Maintenance PaymentsProgram

Foster Care Maintenance ContractSSAlRCCEJ-II-OOIADPICS No. NOOB1400142

CONTRACT DESCRIPTION: Approval request of a sole source contract forresidential foster care for one severely, medically-fragile youth for a period of 14 months and 19days in order to continue existing critical services which other in-stale facilities are not able [0

provide. This youth requires continuity and familiarity with nursing care in his currentplacement that is consistent with the treatment plan.

AWARD:

TERM:

AMOUNT:

PROCUREMENT METHOD:

BID OR PROPOSALS:

MBE PARTICIPA TION:

PERFORMANCE SECURITY:

INCUMBENT:

LifeLine, Inc.Laurel. MD

11/12/2010 - 1/30/2012

$331,174 (14 Months; 19 Days)

Sole Source (Continuity of Care)

N/A

None (See Requesting Agency Remarks below)

None

Same (See Requesting Agency Remarks below)

58


2BBPW 10/20/2010


ACTION AGENDA

ITEM: l-S (ConL)

•

REQUESTING AGENCY REMARKlii: Request for approval of a sole source contract forresidential foster care for one severely, medically-fragile youth for a period of 14 months and 19days in order to continue existing critical services. In 2007. on behalf of the client theDepartment entered into an emergency one-year contract with LifeLine, Inc .• an in-state facility.A second sole source contract for two years was approved on the 111512008 DHM BPW Agenda,Item 3-5. That contract began on 1l/1212008 and is due to expire on llli 1/20 IO. Lifeline Inc. isan assisted living facility that provides out of home care for children with medical/developmentaldisabilities and for children who no longer meet the medical necessity criteria for continuedhospitalization.

LifeLine Inc. is approved by the Developmental Disabilities Administration and has a programthat will allow this youth to transition into the adult system when he becomes age appropriate.This youth requires continuity and familiarity with nursing care in his current placement that isconsistent with the treatment plan. It is, therefore, in the best interests of the child and the Slatenot to disrupt the current placement or change the existing provider of nursing services. Theprocurement method used for this contract is Sole Source and COMAR 21.14.01.06.C(I)(b)supports the decision of Sole Source for continuity of care.

COMAR 14.31.06.01 articulates the standards that must be met and maintained by residentialchild care programs for children and youth. These requirements are designed to protect thehealth, safety, and well being of children placed in residential child care programs.

This sole source contract is needed through 1/30/2012 al which time the child will be 21 yearsold and his care cost will no longer be provided by the Department.

The total award amount of $331,174 a'isumes that the slot purchased will be occupied by thisyouth for the 14 months and 19 days period. This is a reimbursement contract. The vendor ispaid solely for the actual number of days this child is with the vendor.

No MBE goal wa••established for this contract because it did not meet the criteria for inclusionof a 5% MBE subcontracting goal as established by DHR and the Department of JuvenileServices (DJS). The criteria requires that all foster care/per diem providers who have a capacity,as approved by the Interagency Rate Committee (lRC), of 25 or more slots across all programs tohave an MBE goal. This provider ha ••onc (I) slot.

59

3BBPW 10/20/2010


ACTION AGENDA

ITEM: 1-S (ConL)

FUND SOURCE:

APPROP CODE:

RESIDENT BUSINESS:

MD TAX CLEARANCE:

66% General; 34% Federal

NOOGOOOI

Yes

10-5257-0110

Board of Public Works Action - The above referenced Item was:

(APPROVE0 DISAPPROVED DEFERRED

a WITH DISCUSSION

WITHDRAWN

GO

4BBPW 10120/2010


ACTION AGENDA

SERVICES CONTRACT

ITEM: 2-S Agency Contact: Horacia [email protected]

DEPARTMENT~ROGRAM:

CONTRACT ID:

Environment (MDE)Land Management AdministrationMining Program

Technical Assistance in Miningand Mine ReclamationADPICS BPO No. UOOB1400007

CONTRACT DESCRIPTION: Provide professional services to support theregulation of active surface and underground coal mines and for the reclamation of abandonedcoal mines.

AWARDS:

TERM:

AMOUNT:

PROCUREMENT METHOD:

BIDS OR PROPOSALS:

MBE PARTICIPATION:


CTL Engineering of West Virginia, Inc.Morgantown. WV

CME Engineering LPFrostburg. MD

10/21/2010 - 10/20/2015

$500,000 NTE

Competitive Sealed Proposals

See Attachment

20% (Sec Requesting Agency Remarks below)

None

61


5BBPW 10/2012010


ACTION AGENDA

ITEM: 2-S (ConL)

INCUMBENTS: CTL Engineering of West Virginia, Inc.Morgantown, WV

GAl Consultants. Inc.Homestead, PA

REQUESTING AGENCY REMARKS: A notice of the availability of the Request forProposals (RFP) was advertised on eMaryhmdMarketplace.com and the MOE website. Thenotice was sent to 31 prospective vendors. II of which arc Maryland firms and six are MBEs. Inaddition. six prospective vendors were directly solicited via email, two of which arc Marylandfirms and none are MBEs. A copy wa<;also provided to !.heGovernor's Office of MinorityAffairs.

Five proposals were received in response to the RFP. As indicated in Attachment I, all of theproposals were deemed rea'ionably susceptible of being selected for award. Award is beingrecommended to CTL Engineering of West Virginia, Inc. (CTL) and CME Engineering LP(CME).

CTL wa~ ranked overall #1 with the second highest Technical Offer and the lowest price. Thealmost $27,000 difference in price (36%) between CTL and the #1 ranked Technical Offeror wasjudged to outweigh the comparatively slight technical differences between the two Offerors.CME was ranked overall #2 with the second lowest price and the fourth ranked Technical Offer.CME's Financial Offer was 32% lower than the #1 ranked Technical Offeror and 30% lowerthan the #3 ranked Technical Offeror. These price differences were determined to outweigh thetechnical differences between these two offerors and CME.

Multiple awards were made due to workload and possible conflicts-of-interest with regulatedcustomers, Since CTL provided the most advantageous offer, it will have the right of firstrefusal on any task order work under this contract.

The geneml contractor will provide technical services to support MDE's Mining Program'sresponsibilities for regulating mining and accomplishing mine reclamation project activities,such as how coal mining and mine reclamation affects:

• the properties and distribution of water on and below the earth's surface;• terrestrial and aquatic plant and animal life; and• the chemistry of land and water.

62

6BBPW 10/20/2010


ACTION AGENDA

ITEM: 2-S (ConL.)

A model was used to evaluate the financial proposals. The model emulated the personnel timeand services of a typical task order to be assigned to a contractor. The Award Amount is basedupon the MOE budget for these services.

A 20% MBE participation goal was established for these services based upon the number ofsuhcontraetable services available during any particular task order 10 be perfonned and thenumber of available certified minority businesses located within a 2.S-hour radius of the MOEFrostburg field office. Some of the subcontraetable services include. bul are not limited 10.drilling. aerial photography and materials testing.

FUND SOURCE:

APPROP. CODE:

RESIDENT BUSINESSES:

MD TAX CLEARANCES:

95% Federal;5% Special (Bituminous Coal Account)

UOOA061O

No for CTL; Yes for CME

10-5161-0000 (CTL)10-5302-0111 (CME)


CPPROVED :> DISAPPROVED

- WITH DISCUSSION

DEFERRED WITHDRAWN

CHOUT DISCUSSION)

63

ITEM: 2-S (Cont.) AITACHMENT7B

BPW 10/20/2010

BIDS OR PROPOSALS (Cnnt.):

Tech. Financial OverallOfferors Rank Offer (Rank)' Rank**

CTL Engineering of 2 $48.585.00 (1) 1West Virginia, Inc.Morgantown, WV

CME Engineering LP 4 $51.311.00 (2) 2Frostburg, MD

Tetra Tech NUS. Inc. 3 $73.267.50 (4) 3Pittsburgh. PA

Potesta & Associates, Inc. $75,569.00 (5) 4Morgantown, WV

Rummel. Klepper & Kahl. LLP 5 $65,085.50 (3) 5Keyser. WV

Note: * Financial Offers were based upon a model that emulated the personnel time and servicesof a typical task order to be a'isigned in order to allow for proper comparisons between Offerors.

** Technical and financial factors were weighted equally in determining the overall ranking.

64

8BBPW 10120/2010


ACTION AGENDA

SERVICES CONTRACT

ITEM: 3-5 Agency Contact: Marcus [email protected]

()EPARTMENT PROGRAM:

CONTRACT IllS:

Juvenile Services (015)Contractual Residential Operdtions

II-PO-015;AOPIC5 No. VOOB1400011

CONTRACT DESCRIPTION: Provide residential services for youth referred byDJS who are before the Juvenile Courts of the State of Maryland. The type of program providedby this contractor is a residential schooL

AWARD:

TERM:

AMOUNT:

PROCUREMENT METHO():

MBE PARTICIPATION:


INCUMBENT:

Cedar Ridge Children's Home and School. Inc.Williamsport, MD

11/1/2010-6/30/2014

$4,290,000 (3 Years, 8 Months)

Non-Competitive Negotiated Procurement ofHuman. Social or Educational Services

1% (See Requesting Agency Remarks below)

None

Same

REQUESTING AGENCY REMARKS: Request for approval of a licensed contractor toprovide residential services for youth referred by DIS. DJS is required to provide bothresidential and non-residential services and programming for youth who are ordered by theJuvenile Court to be placed in specific types of programs. Since DJS does not have a sufficientnumber of State operated programs, private providers have been relied upon to provide themajority of these services and programs.

65


9BBPW 10/20/2010


ACTION AGENDA

ITEM: 3-5 (Con!.)

The State's Office of Children, through the Interagency Rates Committee (IRe) setsstandardized rates for these services. DJS determines the not to exceed amount based upon anestimated number of youth that may require these services annually. The Contractor will be paidonly for the youth placed in the program for the actual number of days they receive services.Daily (Per Diem) rates are paid in accordance with the IRe. It is estimated that 15 clients will beserved by this contract.

These services were procured through Non-Competitive Negotiated Procurement of Human.Social or Educational Services. (See State Finance and Procurement Article 13-106 andCOMAR 21.14.01.03 G). The reasons for employing this method of procurement are:

• DJS's Secretary and Procurement Officer have determined that two or moresources for the service are available but that because of the absence of effectivecompetition, it is unreasonable to expect those sources to respond to an Invitationfor Bids under COMAR 21.05.02 or Request for Proposals under COMAR21.05.03;

• For these services, the recommended contractor has submitted an acceptableresponse to a Request for a General Expression of Interest (RGEI) that was lastadvertised in eMary/and Marketplace. com on 3/6/2008 and the Baltimore Sun on3/9/2008;

• Under this procurement method, contractors that respond to the RGEI may beawarded contracts as the need arises, as determined by the Agency head. Asstated above, the DJS Secretary has made this detennination; and

• The Maryland Office of Children is the single point of entry for these servicesunder approved negotiated rates for youth of the various State agencies.

This contract docs not meet the criteria for inclusion of a 5% Minority Business Enterprise(MBE) subcontracting goal as established by DJS and the Department of Human Resources(DHR). The criteria requires that all foster care/per diem providers who have a capacity, asapproved by the Interagency Rate Committee (IRC), of 25 or more slots across all programs tohave an MBE participation goal. However, Cedar Ridge Children's Home and School, Inc. hasagreed to a 1% MBE participation goal.

66

lOBBPW 1012012010


ACTION AGENDA

ITEM: 3-S (Cont.)

FUND SOURCE:

APPROP. CODES:

RESIDENT BUSINESS:

MD TAX CLEARANCE:

85 % General; 15 % Federal

VOOGOI; VOOHOI; VOOIOI; VOOJOl;VOOKOI; VOOLOI

Yes

10-4744-1110


CAPPROVED:> DISAPPROVED DEFERRED WITHDRAWN

WITH DISCUSSION C WITHOUT DISCUSSIO~

&7

11BBPW 10/2012010


ACTION AGENDA

SERVICES CONTRACT MODIFICATION

ITEM: 4-S.MOD Agency Contact: Sandra [email protected]

DEPARTMENTIPROGRAM:

CONTRACT !D:

CONTRACT APPROVED:

CONTRACTOR:

Human Resources (DHR)Frederick County Department of SocialServices (FCDSS)

FCDSS/FINIO-006-A I;ADPICS No. COD39972

6/9/2010 DBM BPW Ageoda Item 6-S

Marvatemp, Inc. (d.b.a. Manpower, Inc.)Fredrick, MD

CONTRACT DESCRIPTION: Provideemploymentservices for theWelfare~to~WorkInitiatives Program and the Food Stamp Supplemental Program WorkRegistration Program.

MODIFICATION DESCRIPTION: Approval request to extend the contract bynine months in order to allow adequate time to complete the procurement process and award anew contract. (Sec Requesting Agency Remarks below.)

TERM OF ORIGINAL CONTRACT:

TERM OF MODIFICATION:

AMOUNT OF ORIGINAL CONTRACT:

AMOUNT OF MODIFICATION:

PRIOR MODIFICATIONS/OPTIONS:

REVISED TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT:

11/1/2009 - 10/3112010

11/1/2010 - 7/31/2011

$195,760 (I Year)

$146,874 (9 Months)

None

$342,634

68


12BBPW 10/2012010


ACTION AGENDA

ITEM: 4-S-MOD (Con!.)

OVERALL PERCENT +/- (THIS MOD):

ORIGINAL PROCUREMENT METHOD:

MBE PARTICIPATION:

+75.03%

Sole Source(Sec Requesting Agency Remarks below)

25%

REQUESTING AGENCY REMARKS: Request for approval of a modification tothe contract by extending the term by nine months to allow the Frederick County Department ofSocial Services to maintain employment services for clients while a new procurement iscompleted and an award can be made.

This Contract prepares and places Temporary Cash Assistance (TeA) and Non-custodial ParentEmployment Program (NPEP) customers in jobs that provide independence from welfare; andprovides training for Food Stamp Employment Training (FSET) and Able-Bodied Adultswithout Dependents (ABAWD) customers identified as mandatory work registrants.Marvatemp, Inc. has successfully bcen providing these services to FCDSS customers. Theprogram services include a wcek.long classroom experience, which focuses on job readinesstraining to help assure the success of customers who hope to transition from welfare rolls tofinancial independence through employment. The Welfare~to.Work Initiative involves workingcollaboratively with FCDSS to provide a continuum of services. aggressively leveragingresources in order to maximize employment skills, provide community service sites, as well asexternal work experience opportunities with private employers and other human service and non-profit agencies, which in turn will lead to identifying potential employment opportunities. Inaddition. the program's subcontractor. BRIDGES, Inc.• also offers a daily job lab option for allof these same customers. The BRIDGES program also provides assistance in placing customerswho are asked to do community service work, and acts as a liaison with the employer communityfor BRIDGES graduate.

Since November of 2009, the Contractor served approximately 203 TCA clients and 74FSET/ABAWD clients. Of those clients served. 115 TCA clients have been placed in jobs (a57% success rate). In addition, 25 NPEP clients were served, and 14 were placed in jobs (a 56%placement rate). DHR is satisfied with the performance of the Contractor for these services.

69

13BBPW 10/20/2010


ACTION AGENDA

ITEM: 4-S-MOD (Cont.)

These services were awarded to Marvatemp, Inc. through a competitive procurement on the10131/2007 DBM BPW Agenda, Item 3-S. The two-year contract (11/112007 -10/31/2009)contained a one-year renewal option. However, the Procurement Officer (PO) at FCDSS retiredin January 2009. The person that replaced him did not submillhe option renewal to DHR in timefor presentation to the BPW for approval. As a result. the renewal option was nol exercised byDHRlFCDSS prior to the end of the base contract term; however the Contractor continued toprovide services for FCDSS. When DHR realized the omission, a retroactive sole source BPWitem was submitted for the time period that would have been the one-year renewal option (DBMBPW Agenda 6/9/2010, Item 6-5). The BPW approved this retroactive submission.

DHR intended to have the new Request for Proposals (RFP) to DBM for review in June 2010.However, there were numerous programmatic revisions made to the RFP, including a change inthe Contract term from two years with a one-year option to a four year term, which necessitatedrevised financial approval by DHR. This has caused a delay in forwarding the new RFP to OHMfor approval prior to publication.

The new RFP is undergoing final review by DHR's Assistant Anorney General (AAG) for formand legal sufficiency, before being forwarded to DBM for approval to solicit. It is judged thatthe nine month extension will be a sufficient amount of time to complete the RFP process andhave an award recommendation to submit to the BPW in July 2011.

FUND SOURCE:

APPROP, CODE:

RESIDENT BUSINESS:

MI> TAX CLEARANCE:

100% Federal

NOOGOOIO; NOOGOO02

Yes

10-5534-1111


<:mmUT DlSCUSSION"J

LAPPROVED> DISAPPROVED

WITH DISCUSSION

DEFERRED WITHDRAWN

70

14BBPW 1012012010


ACTION AGENDA

SERVICES CONTRACT MODIFICATION

ITEM: 5-S-MOD Agency Contact: Sandy [email protected]

DEPARTMENTWROGRAM:

CONTRACT 10:

CONTRACT APPROVED:

CONTRACTOR:

Human Resources (DHR)Calvert County Department of SocialServices

CALDSS/SSA-07-ool-A5;ADPICS No. C0D39858

Approved by DBM on 4/26/2007 andreported on the April 2009 DBM PAAR

Sharon M. Kelsey LLCLargo, MD

CONTRACT DESCRIPTION: Provide legal representation 10 the CalvertCounty Department of Social Services before the Courts of Calvert County in matters of ChildWelfare and Adult Protective Services, Foster Care, Child Care, and Families with Children, asrequired by Human Services Article, *3-601 of the Annotated Code of Maryland.

MODIFICATION DESCRIPTION: Approval request 10 extend the Contract byone year in order to allow DHR and the Office of the Attorney General Lacomplete a cosl-benefits analysis of providing legal services to the local departments of social services.

TERM OF ORIGINAL CONTRACT:

TERM OF MODIFICATION:

AMOUNT OF ORIGINAL CONTRACT:

AMOUNT OF MODIFICATION:

5/1/2007 - 4/30/2009 (w/l one-yearrenewal option)

1111/2010 -10/3112011

$102,000 (2 Years)

$102,000 (I Year)

'/1


15BBPW 1012012010

SUPPLEMENT IIDEPARTMENT OF IIUDGET AND MANAGEMENT

ACTION AGENDA

ITEM: 5-S-MOD (ConI.)

PRIOR MODIFICATIONS/OPTIONS:

REVISED TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT:

PERCENT +/- (THIS MODIFICATION):

OVERALL PERCENT +/-:


MilE PARTICIPATION:

$120,650 (See Attachment)

$324,650

+100.00%

+217.70%

Competitive Scaled Proposals

5%

REQUESTING AGENCY REMARKS: Request for approval to modify the Contractby extending the lenn by one year to allow the Calvert County Department of Social Services tomaintain legal services for clients while DHR, in conjunction with the Office of the AttorneyGeneral (GAG), completes a cost-benefit analysis of contracting for legal services for the localdepartments of social services vs. hiring staff attorneys for the positions.

This contract provides legal representation for the Calvert County Department of Social Services(CCDSS) before the Calvert County courts in matters relating to Child Welfare, Adult ProtectiveServices. Adult Services, Foster Care, and Services to Families with Children. In addition. theattorney must consult with and advise CCDSS staff on genera11egaJ matters which may comebefore the agency. as required by Human Services Article, ~3-601. of the Annotated Code ofMaryland. Sharon M. Kelsey, LLC, the Attorney/Contractor, will devote an average of 30-40hours per week in handling these mallers. The services provided by Sharon M. Kelsey. Esq.have been in accordance with the contract.

The amount of hours initially required to perform these services were estimated at 15-20 hoursper week. However, it was determined that the number of hours the Contractor actually workedto perform the Contract requirements was between 30-40 hours per week, thus resulting in asubstantial increase in the need for these services. This increase in work hours was due to anunanticipated influx of new Children in Need of Assistance (CINA) petitions brought before thecourts. As a result, the number of ClNA petitions filed during the Contrdct tenn has increasedfrom 21 in FY 2007, to 45 in FY 2010. As a result of the increase in petitions brought forth, amodification was approved to increase the amount paid to the Contractor (sec Attachment).

'12

16BBPW 10/20/2010


ACTION AGENDA

ITEM: 5-S-MOD (Con!.)

The new RFP for these services is currently with DBM for approval; however until the costbenefit analysis ha<; been completed, the GAG has requested that DHR suspend proceeding withnew procurements for legal representation.

This modification for a one year extension of the currcnt services with Sharon M. Kelsey. Esq. isin the best interest of the State because it will allow time for the GAG to determine if the State isable to handle these services with State employees or if soliciting for services by an outsidecontractor is the most cost effective means of providing these vital services.

FUND SOURCE:

APPROP. CODE:

RESIDENT BUSINESS:

MD TAX CLEARANCE:

80% General; 20% Federal

NOOGOOO3

Yes

10-5481-0000


CPPROVED> DISAPPROVED DEFERRED WmlDRA WN

WITH DISCUSSION CITHOUT DISCUSSIO?~----i'3

ITEM: 5-S-MOD (ConL) ATTACHMENT17B

BPW 10120/2010

PRIOR MODIFICATIONS/OPTIONS (Cont.):

Option #1

Mod #]

Mod #2

Mod #3

Total

$57.500

$21,500

$1,736

$39,914

$120,650

Exercised the single one-year Renewal Option ascontained in the original contract for the periodfrom 5/1/2009 through 4/30/2010. Approved byDBM and reported on the April 2009 DBM PAAR.

Modified the conlract to increase the number ofwork hours necessary to complete the ContractRequirements due to underestimation of work hoursunder the original Contract for the period from7/1/2009 through 4/30/2010. Approved by DHR.

Modified the contract for a period of five days from5/1/2010 to 5/5/2010 as a bridge extension in orderto bring this new modification extension to theBPW for approval. Approved by DHR.

Modified the conLract for a period of six monthsfrom 5/612010 to 10/3112010 in order to completethe solicitation and award of a new RFP. Approvedon the 5/5/2010 DBM BPW Agenda. Item 8.S-MOD.

"4I .

ICIlPW IIJ/2IJ/2010

SUPPLEMENT CUNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF MARYLAND

ACTION AGENDA

AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT

CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT

ITEM: I-C

INSTITUTION:

CONTRACT Ill:

CONTRACT APPROVED:

Agency Contact: James [email protected] Rep: James Stirling

University of Maryland, Baltimore

On-Call Construction Management at Risk Servicesfor the UMB 611J Floor Il00vard Hall and HealthScience Facility I Building Stimulus Project-TaskOrder Proposal #10-375 AI' against On-Call CM @Risk Stimulus Contract RFP #86142RA

10/21/09 USM IlPW Agenda Item I-COption I 10/06110 Agenda Item 2-C OPT

CONTRACT DESCRIPTION: Professional management and construction services duringpre~construction and construction for renovations to the 8,000 gross square foot sixth floor ofI Ioward Hall and Health Science Facility I at the University of Maryland, Baltimore. Therenovation will provide efficient and flexible research, office, conference room, andadministrative support facilities for the School of Medicine.

AWARD:

CONTRACT TERM:

AMOUNT:

PROCUREMENT METHOD:

Henry H. Lewis LLCd/b/a Lewis Contractors55 Gvvynns Mill CourtOwings Mills, MD

Ten months from issuance of the design notice toproceed; and, nine months frol11the constructionnotice to proceed.

$1,700,000.00

On-Call CM Task Order Proposals


2CBPW 10/20/2010


ACTION AGENDA

ITEM: I.e (continued)

TASK ORDER I'ROI'OSALS:Price

Lewis Contractors, Owings Mills

Oak Contracting, Baltimore

Plano-Coudon. Baltimore

Whiting-Turner, Baltimore

Gilbanc, Laurel

MilE PARTIClI'ATIO:"i:

PERFORMA:"iCE 1l0ND:

$341.414

$342,100

$355,595

$362,629

$426,690

25%

100% performance bond

n.EMARKS: The project was competed among six on call stimulus construction managers.Five responsive proposals \vere received. The proposals wcre evaluated based on price whichincludes preconstruct ion phase fees, construction phase fees, general conditions and eMcontingency. Award of this task order is recommended to Lewis Contractors, the low priceofferor. If the task order amount needs to be increased or decreased by $500,000 or more afterBoard approval. the University \vill return to the Board for approval to modify the task order.The estimated construction cost for this project is $1,700,000 which included construction fees,general conditions. eM contingency and GMP's.

FUND SOUllCE:

RESIDENT BUSINESS:

MlJ TAX CLEARANCE:

1l0AIW OF PUIILlC WORKS ACTION:

('"APPROVED:> DISAPPROVED

WITHlJlSCUSSION

NIH Grant (ARRA Stimulus Funds)

Yes

10-5514-1011

THE AIIOVE REFERENCElJ ITE;I>IWAS:

DEFERRED

WITHOUT IlISCUSSIO,

,'6

3CIlPW 10/20/2010


ACTION AGENDA

GENERAL MISCELLANEOUS

ITEM: 2-GM A~ency Contact: James Salt301-445-1987isaltuv,usmd.cduUSM Rep: James Stirling

J~ccommcndation: [n accordance with State Finance and Procurement Article Section Sw301,Annotated Code of Maryland, the Board of Public Works is requested to approve the usc ofGeneral Obligation Bond funding for the following contracts totaling S567.217.66.

Auth()rit~y: State Finance and Procurement Article, Annotated Code of Maryland, 8-301

A. University of l\'laryland. BaltimoreUMB School of Pharmacy846321 - Addition to Pharmacy Hall

Description:Procurement :\'ll,thod:Award:Amount:Fund Source:

FurniturePreference ProviderMaryland Correctional Enterprises (MCE)$22,902.00MCCBL 2009: p,.ovidejimds to equip an addition andrenovation to the School of Pharmacy. Item 052

B. Univcrsity of 1\1arylanll, BaltimoreUMB School of Pharmacy846216 - Addition to Phamlacy Hall

Description:Procurement :\lethod:Award:Amount:Fund Source:

Tax Compliance No.Rcsident Business:

Triple Quad Mass Spectrometry SystemSole SourceWaters Technologies Corp$319,127.66MCCHl 2009; Provide funds 10 equip an addition andrenomlion 10 the School of Pharmacy. Item 05210-5485-1111No

4CBPW 10/20/2010


ACTION AGENDA

GENERAL MISCELLANEOUS

ITEM: 2-GM (cont'd)

c. Uninrsil)' of i\laryland, C(JlIc~cParkShipley Baseball Field1\-151234 • Furnish and Install Snythctic Turf

Description:Procurement l\'lethod:Award:Amount:Fund Source:

Tax Compliance 1"0.Resident Business:

Momentum 51 synthetic turfCooperative Purchasing ContractShaw Sportexe$225,188$100,000 - MCCI3L 2010: Provide fund~ to construct and

equip improvements 10 Shipley Field. Item 044$ 92,000 - Gift Pledges$ 33,188 • Current Unrestricted Funds10-5616-1111No

BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS ACTION - THE ABOVE REFERENCED ITEM WAS:eROVEll> DlSAPPROVEll DEFERREll WITHDRAWN

WITII IJISCUSSION VITIIOUT DISCUSSION

78

5CHPW 111/20/111

SUPPLEMENT CUI'(IVERSITY SYSTEM OF MARYLAND

ACTION AGENDA

CONSTllUCTlON CmnRACT MODIFICATION

ITEM: 3-C MOD

II'(STITUTION:

CO:>lTRACT !D:

CONTRACT APPROVED:

CONTRACTOR:

Agency Contact: James [email protected] Rep: James Stirling

University of Maryland, College Park

Construction Management at Risk ServicesEngineering Laboratory RenovationsUniversity of Maryland Energy Research Center (UMERC)University of Maryland, College ParkContract No. B-000979 ffask Order No. Y-143975ProjecL No. QC 10294

On Call CM Services (USM Item 2-C, 01/02/2008)CM Pre-Constr. Services (USM Item 4-C, 03/28/2009)GMP#I and #2 (USM Item ll-C MOD, 116/09/10)

J. Vinton Schafer & Sons, Inc.

ORIGINAL CONTRACT IlESCH.IPTION: Construction management services for both pre~construction and construction phases, inclusive of the actual construction for the exteriorrenovations of the Engineering Lab building. Construction includes a two story entrywayaddition to facilitate the new Energy Research Center and replacement of the existing antiquatedall.glass exterior \vall on the north side of the building. Replacement of the single pane exteriorglass wall \vill increase the energy efficiency of the building. The estimated construction cost forthis project is $3.1 million.

MODIFICATION IJESCIUPTION: Award the third and final GMP package. GMP#3includes the balancc of the interior and exterior renovations required to complete the project.

GMP#l included schedule critical IIAZMAT abatement, demolition and ordering of long leadtime f1VAC equipment. GMP#2 aulhorized work to commence on approximately 3,000 SF oflaboratory renovations.TERM OF OIUGI:'JAL CO~TRACT: 7 months pre-construction phase

(3/18/09 - 10/18/09)10 months construction phase from NTP

"/9


6CRPW 10/20/10

SUPPLEMENT CU1\'IVERSITY SYSTEM OF MARYLAND

ACTION AGENDA

ITEM: 3-C MOD (continued)

TER~I OF MODIFICATION:

AMOU1\'T OF ORIGINAL CONTRACT:

A!\IOUNT OF TillS MODIFICATION:

PRIOR ~lOllIFlCATlONS:

REVISED TOTAL C01\'TRACT AMOU1\'T:

ORIGI1\'AL PROCUREMENT METHOD:

MRE l'ARTICIPATlON:


Construction Phase:Balance of Project / GMP#3(10/20/1 0 - 08/05/11)

$35,000 (Preconstruction Phase Only)

$2,559,618 (GMP #3)

SI,080,000 (Includes GMP #1 & GMP #2)

$3,639,618

Competitive Scaled Proposals(Task Order per On-Call eM Contract)

15%

Payment and performance bonds at J 00% ofcontract amount

REMARKS: Facilities Management I Department of Capital Projects at the University ofMaryland, College Park \vill manage the Contractor's work with procurement support from theUniversity's Department of Procurement and Supply.

FUND SOURCES:

APPROP COnE:

RESIIJE1\'T BUSINESS:

MD TAX CLEARANCE:

Plant Funds

R30 B22

Yes

10-5576-1111

BOARD OF I'UBLIC WORKS ACTIO1\' - TIm ABOVE REFERENCED ITEM WAS:

(APPlwv;ii> DISAPPROVED DEFERRED WITH()RA WN

WITH DISCUSSION WITHOUT IlISCUSSIO, '

80

7CBPW 10/20/111


ACTION AGENDA

REAL PROPEH.TY: Acquisition by Purchase

ITEM: 4-RP

INSTITUTION: Coppin Stale University

Agency Contact: James Salt30 J -445-1987([email protected])USM Rep: James Stirling

DESCRIPTION:

PROPERTY:

GRANTOR:

GRANTEE:

Purchase property for the proposed Science and Technology Center

1700 Thomas Avenue, Baltimore

Mohegan Pest Control, Inc.

State of Maryland to the use of the University System of Maryland onbehalf of its constituent institution Coppin Stale University.

APPRAISED VALUE: Colliers PinkardLipman, Frizzell & Mitchell LLC

$26,500.00$27,500.00

FUND SOURCE: MCCBL 0[2008: Providefimds to acquire (I sitejor thenew Science and Technology Center. Item 047

PRICE: Acquisition:Ground Rent:Relocation:Total:

$ 26,500.00$ 1,500.00'$ 41,739.60 "$ 69,739.60

* In addition, to obtain fcc simple title to the property, the underlying ground rent will be redeemed.*'" The tenant will receive relocation assistance.

RE;\lARKS: This is property being purchased in support of the gro\\1h at Coppin StateUniversity and to provide a site for the construction of the new Science and Technology Center.This project will be constructed adjacent to the recently completed Health and Human ServicesBuilding. This acquisition was approved by the University System of Maryland Board ofRegents at its meeting on October 17,2008.

BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS ACTION - TIlE ABOVE REFERENCED ITEM \VAS:

6'ROVED ") IlISAPPROVED DEFERRED WITHDRAWNa __ ----- ••.WITII DISCUSSION enOUT DISCUSSIO~ 1


8CBPW 10/20/10


ACTlO!'l' AGENDA

REAL PROrEI~TY: Acquisition by Purchase

ITE~l: 5-RP

INSTITUTION: Coppin State University

Agency Contact: .James Salt301-445-1987(j saltrmusmd.edu)USM Rep: James Stirling

DESCRII'TlON:

PROPERTY:

GRANTOR:

GRANTEE:

Purchase property for the proposed Science and Technology Center

1605 Thomas Avenue, Baltimore

Ruthie Virginia Williams

State of Maryland to the usc of the University System ofrvlaryland onbehalf of its constituent institution Coppin State University.

APPI{AISED VALUE: Gregory JonesCalvin Thomas

$26,000.00$37,500.00

FUND SOURCE: MeeHL 2008. Item 047:Provide funds to aClluire a sirefor the ~)Tcienceand Technology Centers. Item 047

PRICE: Acquisition:Ground Rent:RelocationTotal:

$ 32,000.00$ 1,400.00 •$ 105,950.00 *'"$ 139,350.00

* In addition, to obtain fce simple title to the property the underlying ground rent will be redeemed.** The tenant will receive relocation assistance.

UEI\IARKS: This property is being purchased in support of the gro\\1h at Coppin StateUniversity and to provide a site for the construction of the new Science and Technology Center.This project will be constructed adjacent to the recently completed Health and Human ServicesBuilding. This acquisition was approved by the University System of Maryland Board ofRegents at its meeting on October 17,2008.

BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS ACTIO;'; - TilE ABOVE REFERENCED ITEM WAS:

eROVED ::> DISA!,PROVED DEFERRED WITlIIJRA WN

WITIIIJISCUSSION ITHOUT IJISCUSSION

82

1OBPW 10/20/2010

DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGYACTION AGENDA

ITEM: I-IT

DEPARTMENT/PROGRAM:

CONTRACT:

Agency Contact:Ronald Brothers (410) 585-3100rc brothers({i)dpscs. state. rod. usRobert Krysiak (410) [email protected]

Public Safety & Correctional ServicesInformation Technology & Communications Division

Cogent Systems On-Site SupportDPSCS IT&CD 2011-03ADPICS No. QOOBI400039

CONTRACT DESCRIPTION: On-site staff and support for the Maryland AutomatedFingerprint Identification System (MAFIS).

AWARD:

TERM:

AMOUNT:

PROCUREMENT METHOD:

MBE PARTICIPATION:

FUND SOURCE:

APPROP. CODE:

INCUMBENT:

Cogent Systems Inc.Reston, Virginia

November I, 2010 - October 31, 2013

$1,443,330.00

Sole Source

13.7%

100% General Funds

QOOAOI02

N/A

REMARKS: This contract provides full-time, onsile Cogent personnel who maintain andmonitor the proprietary portion of the Maryland Automated Fingerprint Identification System(MAFIS), as well as provide general support for MAFIS operational processing.

83


2DBPW 10/20/2010


ITEM: I-IT (Cont.)

Cogent provides staff trained on the proprietary portion ofMAFIS as well as the DPSCSTransaction Controller who processes the information before and after AFIS processing. Cogentis responsible for monitoring AFIS transactions, monitoring hardware status, performinghardware maintenance as necessary, monitoring and configuring system performance, providinguser support, and providing monthly performance repons. Cogent will implement changes to.MAFIS components required by DPSCS business process changes. Cogent personnel ,"villworka staggered schedule to provide maximum system coverage, and will be on call 24 x 7 as MAFISis critical to DPSCS operations. At times, they \',;11also be required to work during the weekendmaintenance for testing changes and upgrading the MAFIS system.

Due to the proprietary hardware, software and system design of the Cogent system, only CogentSystems Inc. can perform this work.

RESIDENT BUSINESS:

MD TAX CLEARANCE:

No

10-5117-1111

<:WITHOUT DISCUSSION;>

DEFERRED


CROVED"> DISAPPROVED

WITH DISCUSSION

WITHDRAWN

84

3DBPW 10/20/2010


ITEM: 2- IT MOD

DEPARTMENT /PROGRAM:

CONTRACT !D:

CONTRACT APPROVED:OPTIONS APPROVED:

CONTRACTOR:

Agency Contact:Tim Stein 410-767-4981tstein,[email protected] Krysiak (410) [email protected]

Health and Mental Hygiene (DHMH)Office of Systems. Operations & Pharmacy

Medicaid Services Eligibility Verification SystemDHMH-OPASS-06-9028-2ADPICS No. MOOB0400278(C0D39020)

DBM Agenda Item 2-S (11/30/2005)DBM Agenda Item 3-S-0pt (10/1/2008)DBM Agenda Item 3-S-0pt (10/21/2009)

Medifax-EDl, LLC (alkJa Emdeon)Nashville, TN

CONTRACT DESCRIPTION: Operate telephone-inquiry system to enable Medicaidproviders to quickly and efficiently verify Medicaid recipient's current eligibility status forcovered services.

I\'10DIFICATION DESCRIPTION: One year extension to allow time for new procurement.

ORIGINAL CONTRACT TERM: 12/1/2005 - 10/31/2008 (w/2 one-year renewal options)

MODIFICATION TERM: 11/01/20I0 - 10/31/20II

ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: $1,092,948

MODIFICATION AMOUNT: $247,000 (one year)

PRIOR MODIFICATIONS/OPTIONS: $507,000 (two I-year options)

REVISED TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: $1,846,948

85

mailto:tstein,[email protected]


4DBPW 10/20/2010


ITEM: 2-fT MOD (Cont.)

PERCENT +/- (THIS MODIFICATION):


15.4%


REMARKS: Request for approval to extend contract term for one year to complete newprocurement. The new RFP procurement process has taken longer then expected. DHMHanticipates recommending a new contract for award by May 2011 for a November 2011 effectivedate.

The contract provides support and maintenance for the Eligibility Verification System (EVS).EVS is a toll-free telephone-inquiry system, available 24-7, that enables healthcare providers toquickly and efficiently verifY a Medicaid recipient's current eligibility status. Emdeon hasperformed very well for the State since it was awarded the contract in 2005. The system has hadlittle-to-any dov,ntime. The system is updated daily with immediate access to updates forproviders. The vendor has provided the State with two different locations (Tennessee andBaltimore) for access so that in the event of a problem at one location, providers still have accessto information. Emdeon has provided a 5% discount for services when the State due to theeconomic situation, requested vendors to accept lesser monetary payments.

DHMH believes that it is in the best interest of the State to extend this contract for services toenable DHMH to solicit and award a new contract to achieve the best tenns of quality of service,cost control, and timeliness.

FUND SOURCE:

APPROP. CODE:

RESIDENT BUSINESS:

MD TAX CLEARANCE:

75% Federal; 25% General

MOOQOlO3

No

10-5341-1110


C'ROVED::> DISAPPROVED DEFERRED WITHDRAWN

WITH DISCUSSION ITHOUT DISCUSSION

bG

5DBPW 10/20/2010


ITEM: 3-IT

DEPARTMENT~ROGRAM:

CONTRACT:

Agency Contact:Carol Kaiser (443-769-1021)ckaiser @collegcsavingsmd.orgRobert Krysiak (410) [email protected]

College Savings Plans of Maryland

Application Hosting & IT Consulting Services10-03R60BI400002

DESCRIPTION: Application hosting, system administration, help desk support andinformation technology consulting services for records administration for the Maryland PrepaidCollege Trust and the Maryland College Investment Plan.

AWARD:

TERM:

Definition 6 LLCAtlanta, GA

10/20/1 0-10/19/11 (w/3 two-year renewal options)

AMOUNT: $159,600 Base year$319,200 Opt. # I$319,200 Opt. # 2$319.200 Opt #3$1,117,200.00 Total

10/20/11-10119/1310/20/13-10/19/1510/20115-10119/17

PROCUREMENT METHOD:

BIDS OR PROPOSALS:

MBE PARTICIPATION:

MBEWAIVER:


Only one proposal received

5%

5%

87

mailto:@collegcsavingsmd.org


6DBPW 10/20/2010

I>EPARTMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGYACTION AGENI>A

ITEM: 3.IT (Cont.)


INCUMBENT:

None

Same

REl\IARKS: A notice of the availability of the Request for Proposals was advertised one.A1arylandMarketplace.com and the DolT website. In addition, the RFP was mailed directly totv/o finns kno••••n to offer similar services. The RFP was also sent to the Governor's Office ofMinority Affairs. A pre~proposal conference was held and 29 firms sent representatives. At thepre~proposal conference, certified Minority Business Enterprises were encouraged to participate.The number of firms that attended the pre-proposal conference evidences interest by a largenumber affirms even though only one bid was ultimately received. Finns that did not bidindicated that they either did not have sufficient resources available; they wanted to dedicateresources toward larger contracts; or they did not feel they could compete at a price that wasclose to the current contract.

The record administration system is used to maintain records for financial and non-financialactivity. Additionally, it is relied on as a database for CSPM employees, contracted customerservice representatives, and approximately 110,000 program participants to access MPCT andMCIP accounts. Definition 6 has been performing these services reliably and competently .. Inaddition, the secure facility that hosts CSPM's servers is world-class in terms of its secureenvironment and its protection from natural or man-made disasters.

A 10% MBE participation goal was included in the RFP. Definition 6 applied for a 5% MBEwaiver ",'hich CSPM has granted.

FUNI> SOURCE:

AI'I'ROP. COI>E:

RESII>ENT BUSINESS:

MI> TAX CLEARANCE:

100% Non Budgeted

R60H0041

No

10-5510.0000


C:ROVEDJ DISAPPROVED DEFERRED WITHDRA WN

WITH DISCUSSION eHOUT DISCUSSION:>83

7DBPW 10/20/2010

(SUPPLEMENT AL)(REVISED)


ITEM: 4-1T

DEPARTMENT:

CONTRACT ID:

Agency Contact:Elliot Schlanger (410) [email protected] Krysiak (410-260-7179)Robert. [email protected]

Information Technology

Statewide Public Safety Wireless Communications SystemADPICS No. 060B9800036

DESCRIPTION: Provide integrated Statewide public safety wireless communication system.System will be the primary radio communication system for public safety first respondersthroughout the State built in five phases. Funding has been identified for the first phase($50.7M) which ""ill build a turn.key radio system to replace Maryland TransportationAuthority's existing system. Funding for future phases v.ill be budgeted as part of the State'sCapital Investment Plan. Once completed, this radio system will be the primary operating radiosystem for all State agencies, providing a communications platform for 16 State operating unitsand allowing for seamless interoperability among State users. The radio system will also provideinteroperability among State and local first responders and leverage infrastructure investmentsmade by county governments and federal grants. This is providing an interoperable backbone tofirst responders at all levels of government. The radio system uses the Public Safety 700 MHzspectrum licensed to the State by the FCC. The terms of this license require demonstrated use ofthe Public Safety 700 MHz spectrum by January 1,2012.

AWARD:

TERM:

AMOUNT:

PROCUREMENT METHOD:

Motorola, Inc.Columbia, MD

10/21/2010- 10/2012018 (w/seven I-year renewal options)

$345,000,000 Base Period (8 Yrs.)20,000,000 (Option Yr. 1)20,000,000 (Option Yr. 2)20,000,000 (Option Yr. 3)20,000,000 (Option Yr. 4)20,000,000 (Option Yr. 5)20,000,000 (Option Yr. 6)20,000,000 (Qption Yr. 7)

$485,000,000 Total


1i9



8DBPW 10/20/2010

(sUPPLEM ENT AL)( RE VISED)

IJEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGYACTION AGENDA

ITEM: ~-IT (cont'd)

PROPOSALS:

Rank*'"Motorola, Inc.

ARINC Incorporated

TechnicalRank

1

2

FinancialOffer'/Rank

$225,664,392 (I)

$235,741,837 (2)

Overall

2

"'Note: Financial offer came from a weighted-average model submitted by the offerors.* "'Note: Technical factors had greater weight than financial factors in the overall award.

MBE PARTICIPATION:

INCUMBENTS:

13.04%

None

REMARKS: A notice of the availability of the Request for Proposals was advertised oneMary/andA1arketplace.com and the DolT website. Through e}vfarylandMarketplace.com, 96prospective firms were solicited. In addition, 69 firms that were knO\\l1 to have offered similarservices were emailed the RFP directly. Of these firms, 20 are certified Minority BusinessEnterprises and 43 are Maryland firms. A copy of the RFP was sent to the Governor's Office ofMinority Affairs.

DolT received three proposals. One proposal was deemed not reasonably susceptible of beingselected for award. The remaining two proposals were evaluated. The Motorola, Inc. proposalwas ranked number one technically and number one financially. Therefore, Motorola's overallproposal was determined to be the more advantageous offer to the State.

In the past, jurisdictions and agencies have built stand alone systems that met individual agencyneeds. However, the deployment of independent non-integrated systems throughout the State(owned and operated by State, county, and local agencies) has created situations that hampercross-jurisdictional and cross-discipline (e.g., police, fire, EMS, transportation) communications.In Maryland, radio communication interoperability among State agencies and localities ishampered by the use of different operating frequency bands, technologies, and systemarchitectures. These systems are generally voice only and do not support mobile dataapplications.

This new system will provide interoperable communications. This is the ability for firstresponders to transmit voice and data communications seamlessly and in real-time, when needed,regardless of agency or jurisdictional boundary. When communications systems areinteroperable, police and firefighters responding to a routine incident or a catastrophicemergency can talk to and share information with each other to coordinate efforts and workeffectively together. SO

9DBPW 10/20/20 I 0

(SUPPLEMENT AL)(REVISED)

DEPARTMENT OF INFORMA nON TECHNOLOGYACTION AGENDA

ITEM: 4-IT (conI' d)

REMARKS: (conI' d)

Many State agency voice systems will need to be replaced within the next five years as theyreach the life-cycle end and must meet the FCC narrow banding deadline. The State willimplement this enterprise solution by the Statewide public safety wireless communication systemthat supports: operable and interoperable public safety voice, low speed data communications,and Homeland Security. The State will use this integrated Statewide public safety \-'lirelesscommunication system as the primary radio communication system for State agencies. Local andmunicipal first responders may also use the system for primary radio communications. Thesystem will provide voice and low-speed data interoperability among its primary users and otherpublic safety agencies to support Day~to-Day, Mutual Aid, and Task Force operations.

For this contract, it was determined that subcontracting opportunities were available in computer/telecommunications equipment installation, in tower construction, in tower equipmentinstallation in field staging and in system testing. The MBE participation goal of 12% wasdetermined based upon analysis of the available subcontracting opportunities for these types ofwork. The contractor has committed to 13.04% MBE participation.

ARINC Inc protested the initial award of this procurement. On March 5, 2010 and March 10,2010, ARINC Inc. sent protest letters to the State. On April 2, the State of Maryland denied theARINC Inc. protests. On April 12, ARINC Inc. filed an appeal with the Maryland State Board ofContract Appeals (Docket No. MSBCA 2707). On October 7, the MSBCA granted the State'smotion to dismiss the appeal.

FUND SOURCE:

RESIDENT BUSINESS:

MD TA..'XCLEARANCE:

Capital FundsPhases/regions will be started as funding becomesavailable. Phase I Region I~A is funded as follows:$22,000,000 MdTA (MA859-000-002)$14,500,000 SHA (Fund 38)$14.200.000 GO Bond (Fvi])$50,700,000

Yes

10-3609-1111

BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS ACTION: THE ABOVE REFEREX ~1WAS:

APPROVED DISAPPROVED DEFERRED j WITHDR<\.WN

'"ITH DISCUSSIO:"l J WITHOUT DISCUSSION 91

Christine A. Romans (410) [email protected]

DEPART;\,IENT OF TRANSPORTATIONACTION AGENDA

Ilrw - 101211/10


ITEM: l-C

American Recovcry & Reinvcstment Act (ARRA)

MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION:

---- CONTRACT I1J:--------T-0451-0140 ~-----------North Avenue Yard Switch Machine InstallationADPICS NO. T04510l40

CONTRACT DESCRIPTION: This Contract is for the replacement of the 24 existing handthrow switch stands located at the Maryland Transit Administration Light Rail North Avenue Yardfacility located at 344 West North Ave, Baltimore, Maryland.

AWARD:

TERM:

Ai\10UNT:

PROCUREMENT ;\,IETHOD:

RIDS:M.e. Dean, Inc.Dulles, VA

Balfour Beatty Rail, Inc.EI Monte, eA

Progress Rail Services, Corp.Albertville, AL

DIlE PARTICIPATION:

PICRFORMANCE SECURITY:

M.e. Dean, Inc.Dulles, VA

550 Calendar Days

$3,459,260.00

Competitive Sealed Bidding

$3,459,260.00

$3,479,422.64

$3,989,978.00

10%

Performance Bond at 100% of Contract Amount

RF::\tIARKS: The Engineer's Estimate for this contract was $3,214,314.

This Solicitation was advertised in eMaryland Marketplace and on MTA's Web Site. One HundredFifty.onc (151) firms received bid packages; Eighty (80) wcre Maryland tinns. Three (3) bids werereceived.

92


ITEM: I-e (Continued) BPW -10/20/10

2

The MTA is replacing the switches at the North Avenue Light Rail yard to improve the efficiency andthe safety of the LR maintenance facility. Switches allow trains to move from one set of tracks toanother and the current switches are operated manually by hand cranks. This project will replace themanual switches with electrified switches that can be operated via a pushbutton that controls the trackswitch movement. The project also includes for the installation of switch stands which provideshousing for the pushbutton located near the track switch.

The DBE goal established for this contract was 8%; however the Contractor is exceeding the goal by2%.

The estimated number of jobs that will be retained/created from this contract is 2-3.

FUND SOURCE:

APPROPRIA TIO],; CODE:

RESIDENT BUSINESS:

MD TAX CLEARANCE:

100% OS50 Funds

J05HOlO5

Nu

10-5541-1011

BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS ACTION - THE ABOVE-REFERENCED ITEM WAS:

CPROVED > D1SAI'I'ROVEIJ DEFE~RED WITIIDRA WN

WITH DISCUSSION VITHOUT DISCUSSION

Sandra E. Clifford -410-537-7814sclifford l@mdta,state.md.us

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONACTION AGENDA


ITEM: 2-C

MARYLAND TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY:

BPW -10120/10

J

CONTRACT Ill: PB 2241-000-007Roof Replacement at the Point Breeze Garage Building

-- ----2300 Brocning Highway Baltimore City------

CONTRACT DESCRIPTION: This contract is for the demolition of the existing concrete deck,rooting, tlashing and other appurtenances. It also is for the construction of a new composite roof deckand the installation of a new SBS modified membrane roofing system.

AWARD:

TERM:

AMOUNT:

PROCUREMENT .\lETHOD:

BIDS:J&R Roofing Co, Inc.Jessup, MD

SGK Contracting, Inc.Bowie, MD

Simpson of Maryland, Inc.Hanover, MD

Boblils Enterprises, LLCHughesville, MD

Vatica Contracting, Inc.Hyattsville, MD

Citi Roof CorpColumbia, MD

Autumn Contracting, Inc.Alexandria, V A

J & K Contracting, Inc.Capitol Heights, MD

J&R Rooting Co, Inc.Jessup, MD

120 Calendar Days

$378.025.80

Competitive Scaled Bidding

$378,025.80

$422,490.00

$451.400.00

$478,000.00

$482,474.00

.$495.000.00

$608,008.00

$833.080.00

mailto:l@mdta,state.md.us

ITEM: 2-C (Continued) BPW -10/20/10

4

MBE PARTICIPATION:

PERFORMANCE SECURITV:

0% (single element of work)

Payment and Performance Bond at 100% of ContractAmount

REMARKS: The Engineer's Estimate for this contract was $416,109.00.

On August 4, 2010, eight bids were received for this competitive sealed bidding solicitation. Theavailability of this Invitation for Bids (IFB) was advertised on MDTA's website and also on eMM. TheMDTA's PRG considered this contract and recommended direct solicitation to MBE firms.259 contractors were directly solicited for this project on eMM, forty.three of which were MDOTcertified MBE"s. Twenty two (22) firms purchased bid packages; eighteen (18) were Maryland finns.Eight (8) bids were received.

The estimated number of jobs that will be retained from this contract is approximately 16. The roofassembly does qualify as a green roof. The roof is over 25 years old.

FUND SOURCE:

APPROPRIATION CODE:

RESIDENT BUSINESS:

MD TAX CLEARANCE:

MDTA CIP Funds

29.10.02.01

Ves

10-5544-1111

BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS ACTION - THE ABOVE-REFERENCED ITEM WAS:

~OVEV DISAPPROVED DEFERRED WITHDRAWN

> WITH DISCUSSION CWITHOUT DISCUSSION=:> ~ 5

Robert P. Gay [email protected]

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT AnONACTION AGENDA

AIlCIIITECTURALIENGINEERING SEIlVICES

IlPW - 10/20/10

;

ITEM: 3-AF.

STATE IIIGHWA Y ADMINISTIlA nON

CONTRACT IIJ: BCS 2007-18 BHighway Noise Analysis and Sound Barrier Design

--- --- Services, StatewideADPICS NO. SBCS0718B

CONTRACT DESCRIPTION: This is one (1) of six (6) open-end task order contracts to providehighway noise analysis and sound barrier design services, Statewide, for the Community DesignDivision (COD) of the Office of Highway Development (OHO).

PIlOCUIlEMENT METHOD:

AWAIlD:

AMOUNT:

TERM:

DBE I'AIlnCIPATION:

i\'Jal")'hmd Architectunll and Engineering Services Act;recommendation approved by the TransportationProfessional Services Selection Board on October 7, 2010.

Johnson, Mirmiran & Thompson, Inc.Sparks, Maryland

$2,000,000.00

Five (5) Years (ending October 1,2015)

25%

PROPOSALS:

Wallace, Montgomery & Associates, LLPTowson, MD

Johnson, Minniran & Thompson, Inc.Sparks, MD

Technical ProposalRating (Max 500)

326

322

TechnicalRankingI

2

NTEPriceContract A

$2,000,000.00Contract B

McCormick Taylor, Inc. I AECOM USA, Inc.Baltimore, MD

Rummel, Klepper & Kahl, LLPBaltimore, MD

The Wilson T. Ballard CompanyOwings Mi1ls, MD

319

316

312

3

4

5

Contract C$2,000,000.00BPW Approval09/22/10

Conlract 0

Contract E$2,000,000.00BPW Approval09/22/10


ITEM: 3-A£ (Continued) BPW -10/20/10

6

PROPOSALS (Cont'd):

Whitman, Requardt & Associates, LLPBaltimore, MD

Century Engineering, Inc.Hunt Valley, MD

URS CorporationHunt Valley, MD

KeITechnologies, Inc.Sparks, MD

A.D. Marble & Company/Whitney, Bailey, Cox & Magnani, LLC

Owings Mills, MD

Brudis & Associates, Inc.!Gannett Fleming, Inc.Columbia, MD


307

291

290

285

272

267

TechnicalRanking6

7

8

9

10

11

NTEPriceContract F

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

REMARKS: The Solicitation was advertised in The Daily Record, eMaryland Marketplace andSHA Web Page. A total of eleven (11) engineering consultant firms submitted technical proposals forthis project, all of which are Maryland firms.

The Consultant shall perfonn noise analysis, vibration analysis and sound barrier design services, whichwill include, but not be limited to: noise level monitoring, sound barrier analysis and design, structuralengineering, traffic engineering, utility design, drainage design, erosion and sedimcnt control, landscapearchitccture design, graphic presentations, report preparation and drafting.

This contract includes a provision authorizing an extension for a reasonable, limited and defined time tospend funds remaining on the contract as provided in Board Advisory 1995-1.

FUND SOURCE:

APPROPIUATION CODE:

MD TAX CLEARANCE:

RF:SIDENT BUSINESS:

Federal and Special Funds Budgeted to SJIA

lJO 10 1

10-5549-1111

Yes

BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS ACTION - THF: ABOVE RF:FF:RENCEIJ ITEM WAS:

AI'PIU)VED D1SAI'I'IWVF:1J IlIcFERRED WITHDRAWN

WITH DISCUSSION WITHOUT IlISCUSSION 97

Robert P. Gay 410-545-0433rgav@sha,sI3tf,md.us

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONACTI01'O AGENDA

ARCHITECTURALlE1'OGINEERING SERVICES

ITEM: 4-AE

STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION

BPW - 10/20/10

7

CONTRACT ID: BCS 2009-04 BWetland Delineation & Permitting Services,

_________ Stalcwidc _ADPICS NO,: SBCS0904B

CONTRACT DESCRIPTION: This is the last of three (3) open-end task order contracts to providewetland delineation and permitting services, Statewide.

PROCUREMENT METHOD:

AWARD:

AMOUNT:

TERM:

[JBE PARTICIPATION:

l\1arylllnd Architectural and Engineering ServicesAct; recommendation approved by the TransportationProfessional Services Selection Board on October 7,2010,

Greenhorne & O'Mara, Inc.!Greenman-Pedersen, Inc.

Baltimore, MD

$2,000,000,00

Five (5) Years (ending October I, 2015)

22%

PROPOSALS:

McCormick Taylor, Inc.Baitimore,MD

Grccnhorne & O'Mara, Inc.!Greenman~Pedcrsen, Inc.

Baltimore, MD

Rummel, Klepper & Kahl, LLPBaltimore, MD


510

493

491

TechnicalRanking1

2

3

NTEPriceContract A$2,000,000,00BPW Approval7/28/1 0

$2,000,000,00Contract B

Contract C$2,000,000,00BPW Approval7/7/10

Whitman, Requardt & Associates, LLPIBiohabitats, Inc.

I3altimore, MD4X3 4 N/A

98

mailto:rgav@sha,sI3tf,md.us

ITE:I'I: 4-AE (Continued) BPW - 10/20/10

8

PROPOSALS (Conl'd):

URS CorporationHunt Valley, MD

Environmental Systems Analysis, Inc.!GaIUlctt Fleming, Inc.

Annapolis, MD


478

473

TechnicalRanking5

6

NTEPriceNIA

NIA

A.D. Marble & Company, Inc.!-A.-MortonThornas & Associates, Inc.~-Owings Mills, MD

Straughan Environmental Services, Inc.!Johnson, Mirmiran & Thompson, Inc.

Columbia, MD

KeI Technologies, Inc.!PB Americas, Inc.

Sparks, MD

The Wilson T. Ballard CompanyOwings Mills, MD

EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc.Hunt Valley, MD

452--

451

434

433

414

7

8

9

10

11

_NIA _

NIA

NIA

NIA

NIA

REMARKS: The Solicitation was advertised in The Daily Record, eMaryland Marketplace andSHA Web Page. A total of eleven (11) engineering consultant finns submitted technical proposals forthis project, all of which are Maryland firms.

The Consultant shall perform the necessary services for wetland delineations, large tree surveys,functional assessments, avoidance/minimization/mitigation reports and joint pennit applications onprojects for compliance with State and Federal regulatory requirements and prepare detailed reportsof the findings.


FUND SOURCE:

APPROPRIATION COilE:

MD TAX CLEARANCE:

RESIDENT BUSINESS:

federal and Special Funds Budgeted to SHA

B0101

10-5517-1111

Yes

BOARD OF PUBI,IC WORKS ACTION - TilE ABOVE REFERENCED ITEM WAS:C"I>ROVED > . DISAPPROVED D~EEBIIEIl WITHDRAWN

WITH IlISCUSSION (:"'1 nWUT IlISCUSSION > 89

Robert P. Gay .UO-5~5-0.B3~sha.state.md.lls


ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING SERVICES

ITEM: 5-AE

STATE HIGIIWA V ADMINISTRA TI01\'

9

IIPW -- 10/20/10

C01\'TRACT Ill:

CONTRACT DESCIUPTlO1\':for Held survey services, Statewide.

PROCUREMENT METHOD:

IICS 2009-11 II, E & FField Survey Services, Statewide

____ ADI'ICS.NO.: SBCS091IB, S13CS091IE &S13CA0911F

These are three (3) of six (6) open-end task order contracts

iVlaryland Architectural and EngineeringServices Act; recommendation approved by theTransportation Professional Services SelectionBoard on October 7, 2010.

AWARD:Johnson, Mirmiran & Thompson, Inc.Sparks, MD

A. Morton Thomas & Associates, Inc.Rockville, MD

Whitman, Requardt, & Associates, LLPBaltimore, MD

AMOV1\'T:

TERM:

DIlE PARTIClI'ATI01\':

Contract B

Contract E

Contract F

$2,000,000.00 (each)

Five (5) Years (ending September 1,2015)

27%

PROPOSALS:

Wallace, Montgomery & Associates. LLPTowson, MD

Johnson. Mirmiran & Thompson, Inc.Sparks, MD


386

379

TechnicalRanking

2

NTEPrice

Contract A$2,000,000.00BI'W Approval09/2211 0

$2,000,000.00(Contract B)

100

10

ITF.M: 5-AE (Continued) BPW - II1/Z0/1O

PROPOSALS (Cont'd):Technical Proposal Technical NTERating (Max 570) Ranking Price

STY Incorporated 362 3 Contract CBaltimore, MD $2,000,000.00

BPW Approval09/22/10

. - - - AS Consultants, Inc, - 361- 4 Contract DBaltimore, MD

A. Morton Thomas & Associates, Inc. 359 5 $2,000,000.00Rockville, MD (Contract E)

Whitman, Requardt & Associates, LLP 354 6 $2,000,000.00Baltimore, MD (Contract F)

Dewberry & Davis, LLC 300 7 N/ABaltimore, MD

The Wilson T. Ballard Company 274 8 N/AOwings Mills, MD

Greenrnan~Pederscn, Inc. 265 9 N/AAnnapolis Junction, MD

KeI Technologies, Inc. 262 10 N/ASparks, MD

EBA Engineering, Inc.!O'Connell & Lawrence, Inc. 252 II N/A

Baltimore, MD

Century Engineering, Inc. 250 12 N/AHunt Valley, MD

Rummel, Klepper & Kahl, LLP 230 13 N/ABaltimore, MD

Development Facilitators, Inc. 227 14 N/AMillersville, MD

URS Corporation 220 15 N/AHunt Valley, MD

Whitney, Bailey, Cox & Magnani, LLC 219 16 N/ABaltimore, MD 101

ITEM: 5-AE (Continued) BPW -10/20/10

II

PROPOSALS (Cont'd):

Loicdcrman Soltesz Associates, Inc.Rockville, MD

Triad Engineering, Inc.Hagerstown, MD


212

194

TechnicalRanking

17

18

NTEPrice

N/A

N/A

~- ~-I{EMARKS: ---The Solicitation was advertised in The Daily- Record, eMaryland Market Placeand SHA web page. A total of eighteen (18) engineering consultant firms submitted TechnicalProposals for this project, all of which are Maryland firms.

The Consultants shall provide various field survey services, statewide, for each assignment, all inconnection with the project.


FUND SOURCE:

APPROPRIATION CODE:

Federal and Special Funds Budgeted to SHA

B0101

MD TAX CLEARANCE:

RESIDENT BUSINESSES:

Johnson, Mirmiran & ThompsonA. Morton Thomas &

Associates, Inc.Whitman, Requardt, &

Associates, LLP

Yes

10-5545-1111

10-5546-1111

10-5547-1111

BOARD OF PUBLiC WORKS ACTION - THE ABOVE REFERENCED ITEM WAS:

eVED/ OISAPPROV~:D DEFERRED WITHDRAWN

WITH DISCUSSION rHOUT DISCUSSION 10 Z

Christine A. Romans (-lID) 767-3796eroma ns(UJmta.m a 1",,1:1nd.gov

DEPAHTMENT OF THANSI'OHTATIONACTION AGE.NDA

MAINTENANCE CONTnACT

ITEM: 6-M

MAHYLAND THANSIT ADMINISTHATION

IlPW - 10/20/10

12

CONTHACT Ill: ------ - -MTA-1317-- ----MARC Frederick and Martin Facilities MaintenanceServicesAIJPICSNO. TMTAI317

CONTRACT DESCRIPTION: This contract provides daily servicing and inspections, runningrepairs, vehicle cleaning of MARC trainsets, routine cleaning, housekeeping and maintenance of theFrederick and Martin's Maintenance Facilities.

AWAHD:

TElL":

AMOUNT:

PHOCUHEMENT METHOD:

DIlE PAHTlCIPATlON:

PEHFOHMANCE SECURITY:

RailPlan International, Inc.Baltimore, MD

Three (3) years wi th two one (1) year options(November 4, 2010 - November 3, 2013)

$ 8,534,918_02

Competitive Scaled Hidding(One Bid Received)

10%

N/A

REMARKS: The MTA issued an Invitation for Bid on March 2, 2010 and received 1 bid onApril 13, 2010. Two firms attended the pre-bid meeting. Certification is required to perfonn the abovementioned work on the railcars. Firms noted a lack of qualified employees in not submitting bids forthis work.

This contract will provide train maintenance services at MTA's frederick Maintenance Facility inFrederick County and at the Martin's Maintenance in Facility in l3altimore County. Both facilities areov.ned by the NITA. The Contractor will be responsible for daily servicing and inspections of MARCtrain cars, repairs to keep the trains in good working order, and cleaning of MARC trains. In additionthe Contractor will clean and perform minor housekeeping services at the actual facilities. The majorityof the work elements under this Contract require special qualification and knowledge of rail cars.

IlJ3

ITEM: 6-M (Continued) BPW - 10/20/10

MTA operates 3 daily trains originating at the Frederick Facility Monday through Friday. Due tocongestion at the Washington Union Station terminal, MTA may also operate several train sets at theMartin's Facility in the future. By moving several trains from the Washington area, the MTA will beable to morc closely control maintenance of its equipment ensuring more trains are available for revenueservice.

The DBE goal established for this contract was 8%, however the Contractor will be exceeding the goalby 2.22%.

-----FUNIl SOURCE: --- ------ 80% Federal Funds Budgeted to MTA- -20% Special Funds Budgeted to MTA

APPROPRIA nON CODE:

RESIDENT IlUSINESS:

MD TAX CLEARANCE:

105110104

Yes

10-5208-1111

BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS ACTION - TilE ABOVE-REFERENCED ITEM WAS:

COVEIY D1SAI'I'ROVED DEH:RRED WITHDRA WN

--- WITH IlISCUSSION ~rII0UT DISCUSSION"::> i (j 4

Robert P. Guy ..f.10.545-0 ..03rgHvrU)sha.statc.ll1l1. us


MAINTENANCE CONTRACT

ITEM: 7-M

STATE HIGIIWA Y AD~IINISTRATlON

14

IlPW --1Il120/10

CONTRACT 1Il:~- --- -5272311413--~~~Drawbridge Operation for Bridge # 23007 on US 50 OceanCity crossing the Sinepuxent Bay in Worcester CountyADPICSNO.5272311413

CONTRACT DESCRIPTION: This Contract consists of the operation of drawbridge#23007 on US 50 Ocean City crossing the Sinepuxent Bay in Worcester County.

AWARD:

AMOUNT:

TERM OF CONTRACT:

PROCUREMENT METHOD:

~1BE PARTICIPATION:


Chesapeake Pilot Training, Inc.Chestertown, MD

$246,960.00 NTE

November 1, 2010 through December 31, 2013

Competitive Scaled Ridding(One Bid Received)

0% (single element ofwark)

Payment and Performance Bonds for 100% of the awardamount exists for this contract

REMARKS: The Solicitation was advertised on cMaryland Marketplace and SHA's Internet WebPage. Two-hundred seventy-six (276) contractors were notified for this project on eMarylandMarketplace; Sixty (60) of which were MOOT certified MBE's.

All bids are a result of Contractor submitted unit prices or labor rates extended by SHA estimatedquantities.

This contract includes a provision authorizing an extension for a reasonable, limited and defined time tospend funds remaining on contract as provided in Board Advisory 1995-1.

100% of the work will be performed by a Certitied Small Business Enterprise.

FUND SOU1KE:

APPIWPRIA TlON CODI,:

100% Special Funds Budgeted to SHA

J021J0102 .. ~lUJ

ITEl\!: 7-l\! (Continued) BPW -10/20/10

15

RESIIlENT BUSINESS:

l\!D TAX CLEARANCE:

Yes

10-5479-0 III

BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS ACTION - THE ABOVE REFERENCED ITEl\! WAS:

C:PROV~ DISAPPROVED DEFEHRED WITHDHA WN

WITH DISCUSSION WITHOUT DISCUSSION 106

Suzette Moore - (410) 859~7792s m 00 rc Uii':' bw ia irllo rt. co III

DPW -10/20/10

16

RENEWAL OPTION

ITEM: 8-M-OPT


(Maintenance)

MARYLAND AVIATION AIlMINISTRA TION

CO NTRA CT ID:

ORIGINAL CONTRACT APPROVED:


CONTRACTOR:

MAA-MC-07-008HV AC Systems, Central Utility Plant and Water

- -Treatment, Temperaturc-&-Automation Controls,-Energy Management and Fire Alaml SystemsOperation, Repair and Maintenance at 8WIMarshall and Martin State AirportsADP[CS NO: C0263324

Item 4-M, DOT Agenda [0103107

Competitive Scaled ProJlosals

Pepea Energy Services, Inc.Arlington, VA

MODIFICATION: Exercise the renewal option for a period of two (2) years from November 1,2010through October 31, 20 [2.

AMOUNT:

ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT:

REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT:

PERCENTAGE INCREASE:

TERM:

ORIGINAL ~11lE PARTICIPATION:

RENEWAL MilE PARTICIPATION:

$ [4,832,074.63

$20,557,[49.48

535,389,224.1 [

73%

[[101I07-IO/31/[0 (Origina[)11/0[110-10/31/12 (Renewa[ Option No. [)

17%

17%

REl\IARKS: This contract provides all labor and materials to operate Heating and Ventilation and AirConditioning (BVAC) systems, Central Utility Plant, water treatment, temperature and automationcontrols, energy management and tire alarm systems for the tenninal, outer buildings, and otherfacilities at BWI ~1arshall and MTN Airports.

Pepco Energy Services (PES) has complied with the contract requirements and has provided outstandingservice at BWI Marshall and Martin State Airports. PES through efficient management of hourly staffand subcontractors has executed the work under budget every year since contract inception.

ITEM: 8-M-OPT (Continued) BPW -10/20/10

17

Through this contract the Fire Alann System inspection, maintenance, and documentation has beenupdated and improved. PES has consistently met the MBE requirements of the contract every year.

This Item was previously submitted and withdrawn as Item 18-M-OPT on the 9/22/10 DOT Agenda.

FUND SOURCE:

APPROPRIATION CODE:

RESIDENT BUSINESS:

MD TAX CLEARANCE:

100% Special Funds Budgeted to MAA

J0610002

No

10-5281-1111

BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS ACTION - TilE ABOVE-REFERENCED ITEM WAS:

COVED ~ IlISAPPIWVED DEFERRED WITHDRAWN

WITH DISCUSSION VITIIOUT lJISCUSSION i lJ 8

Original Contract

ATTACHMENTl

Amount Term BP\VlDCAR ReasonDate

$20,557,149.48 11/01/07.10/31/1 0 10/03/07 Item 4.M

18

Renewal Option NO.1 $14,832,074.63 11/01/10-10/31/12 As provided for inoriginal contract

Revised Amount $35,389,224.11

---- --- --- -------- - -- - --- -----

.,.-

Christine A. Romans - .no-767-3796cromansrtVmta. marYhmd.gov


CONTRACT ,VIODIFICATION (Maintenance)

ITE~I: 9-M-MOD

MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION:

IlPW-10/20/10

t9

CONTRACT !D:

ORIGINAL CONTRACT APPROVED:


T-I096Elevator and Escalator MaintenanceADPICS NO. C0263867~- ~

Item 4-M, DOT Agenda 11/30/05

Competitive Sc.llcd Bidding:

MonIFICA TION: Change Order NO.1 increases the contract amount and extends the contractduration for 242 calendar days to continue to provide preventative maintenance for thirty-nine (39)elevators and cighty.one (81) escalators located on the Metro, Light Rail and MARC Lines.

CONTRACTOR:

AMOUNT:

ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMO[]],;T:



TERM:

OIUGINAL DIlE PARTICIPATION

Schindler Elevator CorporationBeltsville, MD

$6,234,219.00

$17,320,124.00

$23,554,343.00

36% (C.O. # I)

1,825 Calendar Days (Original)242 Calendar Days (CO. # I)

20%

REMARKS: This Contract is for the preventative maintenance coverage of the MTA's thirty-nine (39)elevators and eighty one (81) escalators. The work involved preventative maintenance coverage of allMTA elevators for a period of five (5) years from the date of nolice to proceed and preventativemaintenance coverage of all MTA escalators for a period of four (4) years commencing one (I) yearfrom the date of notice to proceed.

This contract was designed to take on the maintenance of SI escalators as they phased out ofmaintenance coverage under a prior construction contract (1'-1240-0140). Due to budgetary issues, theprior construction contract was later forced to transfer preventative maintenance coverage of itsescalator units to 1'-1096 ten months before scheduled. therefore causing a shortage in funds for elevatorand escalator maintenance. To maintain this equipment in a safe manner. MTA began to usc theexisting contract sooner than expected.

ITEM: 9-C-MOD (Continued) IlPW -10/20/10

20

MTA has an aggressive maintenance plan to preserve the integrity, function and safety of all verticaltransportation equipment. For each type arunit (escalator or elevator) the maintenance planincorporates five (5) types of inspections with varying frequencies. The basic activities occur bi~weeklyand constitute visual inspection and light cleaning. The most laborious occurs annually and involves theremoval of steps, lubrication of chains, etc. Unfortunately, due to the nature of the industry, these unitsundergo a lot of abuse. Whether due to operator error, weather related issues, and/or vandalism, theequipment periodically requires service repairs above routine maintenance measures.

The existing contract expires December 31, 2011. The MTA is requesting a 242 day extension toAugust 31-,20 II to allow time for the procurement of a replacement contract. -The new contractsolicitation was advertised on October 6, 2010.

fUND SOURCE:

APPROPRIATION CODE:

RESIDENT BUSINESS:

MD TAX CLEARANCE:

100% Special Funds Budgeted to NITA

J05110105

Yes

10-5199-0000

BOARD Of PUBLIC WORKS ACTION - TilE ABOVE REfF:RF:NCED ITEM \VAS:

CROVED :::> DISAI'I'IWV~:D DEFERRED WlTllDRA WN

WITIlIllSCUSSION WITIIOUT lllSCUSSION III

21

ATTACHMENT I

Amount

Original Contract $17,320,124

Term BPWIDCARDate

(01/01/06 - 12/31/10) BPW 11/30/05

Reason

Modification #1 $6,234,219 (01/01/11 - 08/31/11)

Revised Amount $23,554,343

------ ---- ------- --- - --

. .-,

•

li2

Jim Haley (410) 865-1131j [email protected]

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT ATlONACTION AGENDA

EQUIPMENT CONTRACT

ITEM: IO-E

BPW -10120/10REVISED

22

THE SECRETARY'S OFFICE:

CONTRACT ID:

On behalf of the Maryland State Police MarylandHelicopter Replacement Program

MDOT-MSPAC-0509Maryland State Police Helicopter Fleet ReplacementADPICS NO: JOIB400003

CONTRACT DESCRJPTlON: Replace the aging MEDEVAC fleet and procure six (6) multi-mission helicopters for the Maryland State Police Aviation Command. with the option to purchase upto an additional six (6) helicopters.

AWARD:

TEfu'\l:

AMOUNT:

PROCUREMENT METHOD:

MBE PARTICIPATION:

Agusta Aerospace CorporationPhiladelphia, PA

30 years from Notice to Proceed (see remarks)• Initial purchase of six (6) helicopters upon notice

to proceed.• Option to purchase up to six (6) additional

helicopters between July 1.2011 and July 312013.

• 30 years from Notice to Proceed for supply ofparts

$72,274,749.05 (Base Contract)6 Helicopters@$11,741,545 ea. = $70,449.270 +Cabin Training Device @$1,341,587 +Special Tools and Equipment@$373,465.55 +Pilot/Medic Safety/Survival Equipment @ 110,428.50Option: Purchase up six (6) additional helicopters atthe original contract price ($11,741.545 ea.) plus anadjustment based on the annual CPI <3% (seeremarks)

Competitive Sealed Proposal(Single Proposal Received)

0% (No MBE helicopter manufactures, suppliers ofhelicopter parts and/or related equipment - see remarks)

113


ITEM: lO-E (Continued) RPW - 10/20/10REVISED

23

PERFORMANCE SECURITY: 100% Performance Bond60% Payment BondParent Company Guaranty (Agusta S.p.A)

REMARKS: On July 8, 2008, the Department of General Services delegated the authority to theMaryland Department of Transportation for the procurement of the Maryland State Police medevachelicopter fleet. A Request for Information (RFI) was developed and directly issued to the fourknO\\l1 Helicopter manufacturers (Agusta Aerospace Corporation, American Eurocopter, BellHelicopter and Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation). The RFI process was used 10 provide themanufactures with an opportunity to review and comment on the State's requirements/specificationdocument and provide the State with a rough order of magnitude as to the potential cost of eachHelicopter. All four manufacturers responded with their suggested/requested changes to the State'srequirements with costs ranging from $14,900,000 to $18.830.000 per Helicopter. All manufacturerssuggested/requested changes to the specification (as a result of the RFI) were incorporated into theRequest for Proposal.

The Request for Proposal (RFP) was published on eMarylandMarketplace on June 26, 2009 anddirectly mailed to the four manufacturers who responded to the RFI. A pre-proposal conference washeld and all additional suggested/requested changes from each manufacturer were incorporated byaddendum into the RFP. One proposal was received on August 26. 2009 from Agusta AerospaceCorporation (AAC) in response to the RFP.

A protest from American Eurocopter was received on August 25, 2009 regarding the specificationsof the RFP. The protest was denied by MOOT on October 16, 2009. American Eurocopter did notappeal MOOT's decision to the Maryland State Board of Contract Appeals.

A comprehensive technical evaluation of the solicitation was completed on October 23, 2009. Thecriteria used by the committee for evaluating the factors was in accordance with the RFP. Theproposal received from Agusta Aerospace Corporation (AAC) meets all of the State's mandatoryrequirements. The utilitarian nature of the proposed AWI39 Helicopter makes it an ideal platform toperform the Multi-Mission operational requirements of the Maryland State Police AviationCommand (MSPAC). The AWl39 Helicopter can readily accommodate mission expansion andgrov.1h should that be required over the next 20+ years. The speed and overall capabilities of theAW139 will allow for a faster response time to and from an accident or incident scene. Theevaluation team consisted of pilots, medics, and maintenance personnel from MSPAC, a medicaldoctor from MIEMSS and a member from the State Fireman's Association.

The Financial Committee completed a comprehensive evaluation of the financial proposal submittedin response to the RFP. In the absence of competing proposals regarding price, a price analysis wasperfonned. The price analysis included market research for similar contracts for the AW 139Helicopter. In addition. pricing investigations and comparisons were completed from variousmanufacturers and other sources of supply. This market research. pricing investigations andcomparisons were used to develop a detailed negotiation strategy. Pursuant to COMAR 21.05.03.05,MOOT entered in price negotiations. Discussions and negotiations were held with Agusta AerospaceCorporation (AAC) to assure the State would receive the best overall value. Best value was definedas a contract with AAC that would; (I) satisfy the State's requirements in terms of product qualityand timely delivery; (2) has a fair and reasonable price; and (3) fairly apportions risk between AACand the State.

i14

ITEM: 10-E (Continued) BPW -10/20/10REVISED

24

REMARKS: (cont'd)The negotiations resulted in Maryland receiving a 13.2% better value as compared to another nearbyState that recently purchased AWl39 helicopters. This better value equates to $1,673,580 perHelicopter. totaling $10,041,482 for the six (6) Helicopters. A representative from the MSPHeadquarters. DBM and MEIMMS made up the Price Evaluation Committee.

In addition to the purchase of the new helicopters, the contract will include initial and recurrenttraining for pilots, maintenance and avionics technicians. a cabin~training device, special tools andequipment. consumable/non-consumable parts and supplies and PilotIMedie Safety/SurvivalEquipment. The State will have the option to purchase up to six (6) additional Helicopters betweenJuly 1, 2011 and July 31. 2013 at the original contract price plus an adjustment (increase or decrease)in the annual Consumer Price Index-Urban not to exceed 3% increase in anyone-year period. Theoption to purchase additional Helicopters will include training for ten (10) pilots for each Helicopterpurchased, The vendor has agreed to support all the helicopters purchased under this contact for thelife of the helicopter or 30 years, whichever comes first. AAC has agreed to give Maryland a 15%discount on parts over the life of this contract. Any additional parts or tools purchased after thedelivery of the new helicopters will be part of MSP's annual Operational Budget.

The MDOT PRG researched and determined that there are no MBE certified contractors for any ofthe potential subcontracting opportunities. However, we intend to seek MBE opportunities for thehelicopter maintenance RFP, Two of ACC's largest suppliers are Hone)'\vell and Pratt and Whitney,Both corporations have been involved in leadership roles in diversity programs for the past severaldecades. Both have received multiple national and regional awards for establishing and participatingin supplier and vendor diversity programs. In addition. both firms also have significant participationand leadership roles in employee diversity programs. Although there are no MDOT certified MBEsfor this requirement. a supplier diversity goal of II % is estimated on this procurement.

A subsidiary of AAC, AgustaWestland North America was recently awarded a U.S. Navy contract toprovide depot level Helicopter maintenance on three H-3 Helicopters. This work will be carried outat the company's 88,000 sq ft facility in Hagerstown Maryland. An additional 20 new employees areexpected to be added to the existing staff of26 at Hagerstown Airport for the U.S. Navy contract.During the past 16 months. Agusta Aerospace Corporation has purchased over $15,000,000 inproduct and/or services from 20 firms located in Maryland,

FUND SOURCE:

APPROPRIATION CODE:

RESIDENT BUSINESS:

MD TAX CLEARANCE:

100% Capi",l Funds (G.O. BOND)

$52.5M - MCCBL2009036$20M - Pre-authorized for FY 2012

MCCBL2012XXX

No

10-5611-0010

BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS ACTION - TilE ABOVE REFERENCED ITEM WAS:

CROVE~DISAPPROVED DEFERRED WITHDRAWN

~CUSSION~ WITHOUT DISCUSSION lIS

Christine A. Romans - 410~767-3796c ro OJ answ)m fa mary hi n d. com


CONTRACT ;YIOIlIFICA T10N (Equipment)

ITEM: II-E-MOD

MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION

IlPW -10/20/10

25

CONTRACT 1IJ:

ORIGINAL CONTRACT APPROYED:


CONTRACTOR:

'1'-1090-0140I-lomeland Security eCTV Surveillance System

-ADPICS NO. C0263645------

Item 1-C, BPW Agenda 9/10/08

Intergovernmental Cooperative PurchaseAgreement

ARINC IncorporatedAnnapolis, MD

MODIFICATION: Change Order No.2 is to provide for an additional 609 calendar days required tocomplete the work until the end of the warranty period of June 30, 2012.

TERM:

AMOUNT:

ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT:



OVERALL PERCENTAGE INCREASE:

ORIGINAL DIlE PARTICIPATION:

600 calendar days from NTP of9/1O/08 (Original)180 days (Change Order No. I)609 days (Change Order No.2)

$ 0.00

$ 10,274,004.21

$ 10,274,004.21

0%

0%

57%

REMARKS: This Change Order is for an additional 609 calendar days required for Phase 2 ofthe Homeland Security Surveillance Project (fISSP). This project is for the installation and systemintegration of Closed Circuit TV (CCTV) at 14 sites. As of August 2010, all sites have been installedexcept MARC Odenton station.

Metro Subway stations - Reisterstown Plaza, Milford Mills, Old Court, Owings Mills,Mondawmin, Upton, and Rogers AvenueLight Rail stops - Hamburg Street, Cromwell Road, Nursery Road and TimoniumMARC stations - Camden and OdentonMetro Subway Porta!Police Monitoring Facility - Reisterstown Plaza 116

ITEM: ll-E-MOD (Continued) HPW -10120/10

26

The MARC Odenton Station is owned by Amtrak and MTA must receive approval from Amtrak beforethe eCTV system can be installed at that facility. A Master Project Agreement between the MT A andAmtrak was signed on February 25, 2010 outlining the various phases of the project. A ProjectInitiation (PI) form was then issued to Amtrak for the Design portion of the work and the MTA iscurrently awaiting a response in order to proceed with the Construction Project Initiation (CPI) portionof the work. The CPI fOfm will need to be submitted to Amtrak for final approval prior to any workbeing performed.

Amtrak has not granted a work agreement or finalized the documents and procedures required 10facilitate the start of construction within the Odenton Station. The delay in approvals makes it necessaryto extend the Contract period. Currently, MTA Systems Engineering is in the process of finalizing anagreement with Amtrak to proceed with the work.

Per Change Order No 1 (eCR No. 003) a Contract Time Extension of one hundred and eighty (180)calendar days was granted due to delay in acquiring a contract work agreement with Amtrak for workslated for the Odenton MARC station of the MTA HSSP Phase 11project.

In addition, the completion dates established in Change Order No. I need to be clarified. The originalContract allowed for the duration of Six-Hundred (600) calendar days. The Contract Notice to Proceedwas noted as 09/08/08, however, NTP should have been 09110/08 with a Contract Completion date set atMay 03, 2010. Based on this information the new Completion date currently noted on Change OrderNo.1 should be changed to 10/30/20 IO.

The DBE goal established for this contract was 30%, however the Contractor will be exceeding the goalby 27%.

FUND SOURCE:

APPROPRIATION CODE:

RESlIJENT BUSINESS:

MD TAX CLEARANCE:

20% Special Funds Budgeted 10 MTA80% Federal Funds Budgeted to MTA

lOS HOlO5

Yes

10-5388-1111

HOARD OF PUHLIC WORKS ACTION - THE ABOVE REFERENCED ITE:I'I WAS:

IJISAPPROVED

WITH DISCUSSION

DEFERRED WITHIlRAWN

WITHOUT IJISCUSSION i 1 7

ATTACHMENT I

CONTRACT Amount Term BPWIDCARDate

Original Contract $ 10,274,004.21 600 days 10106/1 0

Change Order No. t $ 0,00 180 daysChange Order NO.2 $ 0,00 609 days

27

Revised Amount $ 10,274,004,21

, .

118

Christine A. Romans - -110-767-3796crom.U1s(il)mtam a n: (lmd.co m

DEPART1\lENT OF TRANSPORTATIONACTION AGENDA

IlPW -10120/10

28

CONTRACT MODIFICATION:

ITEM: 12-E-MOD

MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION

(Equipment)

- CONTRACT Ill: - - ---T-8000-0256---- -------Procurement of26 Remanufactured CommuterLocomotives Marc Train ServicesADPICS NO. C0263694

ORIGINAL CONTRACT APPROVED: Item 28- E. BPW Agenda 3112/08


CONTRACTOR:

Intergovernmental Cooperative Purchase

MotivePower, IncBoise, Idaho

MODIFICATION: Change Order No. 003 is to cover for additional work required to theremanufactured locomotives.

ORIGINAL TERM:

AMOUNT:

CONTRACT AMOUNT:



ORIGINAL DllE PARTICIPATION:

3 years from NTP of March 21, 2008

$493,286.00

$88,693,670.00 (Original)$ 0.00 (Change Order No. I)$ 372,353.00 (Change Order No.2)$ 493,286.00 (Change Order No. 3)

$89,559,309.00

55% (Change Order No.3)97% (Overall)

0%

REl\lARKS: The MTA and MPI (Motive Power Inc.) have negotiated and agreed that MPI will providevarious repairs, modifications and related spare component upgrades such as replacing fuel monitoringsystem to sight glass, provide fall protection to cab exterior structure, change lever hand brake, changeair dryer, modify brake valve, add reservoir drain guard, rebuild four (4) locomotive trucks to MP36configuration and for the supply of fifteen (IS) bench test equipment (BTE).

FUND SOURCE: 20% Special Funds Budgeted to MTA80% Federal Funds Budgeted to MTA 119

ITEM: l2-E-MOD (Continued) BPW -10/20/10

29

APPROPRIATION CODE:

RESIDENT BUSINESS:

MD TAX CLEARANCE:

l05 HOI05

No

10-5511-0111

~------- - - --~--

BOARJ} OF PUBLIC WORKS ACTION - THE ABOVE REFERENCED ITEM WAS:-.

COVED ~ DISAPPROVEJ} IJEFERREJ} WITHDRAWN

ITH IJISCUSSION if WITIIOUT DISCUSSION i 2 0

ATTACHMENT I

30

CONTRACT

Original Contract

Change Order NO.1Change Order NO.2Change Order NO.3

Amount

$ 88,693,670.00

$ 0.00$ 372,353.00$ 493,286.00

Term

3 years from NTPof3/21/08

BPWIDCARDateItem 28-E, BPWAgenda 03112/08

Total Revised Amount $ 89,559,309,00

:' ," ,. .- ..~.,..~ ~ ,"'. j' ••

121

Chuck Bristow 410-865-1040christowlQ)mdot.state.md.us



ITEM: 13-C

THE SECRETARY'S OFFICE

31

BPW -10120/10REVISEDSUPPLEME],;T AL

CONTRACT !D: 1vlDOT-ll-004Sole Source Fiber Optics InstallationADPICS NO. MDOTl1004

CONTRACT DESCRIPTION: Retroactive approval ofa contract for providing design,fielding, drafting, pennining, as-built documentation, testing, plowing, boring, manholes, fiber markers,enclosures, splicing, inner-duct, restoration, fiber and all other labor and material required for a fullyfunctional and operationally ready 144 count fiber optic cable for State use. The work includes theconstruction O[IWO laterals: Chesapeake Bay Bridge and MD-450.

AWARD:

TERM:

AMOUNT:

PROCUREMENT METHOIl:

MBE PARTICIPATlO],;:


Maryland Broadband Cooperative, Inc.Salisbury, Maryland

June 1,2009 - February 28, 2011

$350,000.00

Sole Source

0% (see Remarks below)

25% Payment and Performance Bond (75% of the work hasbeen completed)

REl\lARKS: The Maryland Broadband Cooperative, Inc. ('MDBC') is a non.profit cooperativetelecommunication service provider that currently provides fiber optic infrastructure and services inunderserved rural areas of the State of Maryland. The Maryland General Assembly, under Senate Bill753 (SB753) in the 2006 Legislative Session and subsequently signed into law, granted non-profittelecommunication service providers in rural and underserved areas the use of SHA rights-of-way forthe installation of broadband communication infrastructure \',:ithout imposition of any charge for the useof the rights-of-way.

In November 2007, the Maryland Department of Transportation (MDOT)/State Highway Administration(SHA) entered into a Memorandwn of Understanding (MOU) \\lith the Maryland BroadbandCooperative, Inc. (MOBC) referred to as the "Original MOU". The tenn of the Original MOU is 10years. Federal guidelines contemplate that SHA will receive a benefit resulting from MOBC's use ofSHA's right of way. However. State law allows MOBC access to SHA right-of-way at no

122

ITEM: I3-C (Continued)

32

BPW -10/20/10REVISEDSUPPLEMENTAL

charge. As pan of the Original MOU, MDBC would provide the State with the use ofa portion ofMOBC's fiber in all of its backbone (including future construction) consisting of 12 fiber optic strandsfor State use. As part of the Original MOU, MDBC also agreed to construct ten (10) fiber optic lateralsthat provide connectivity for several State and local agencies. The agreement was structured as an MOUon the incorrect assumption that MDBC was a quasi~govemment agency.

In early 2009, MDBC informed the State that it was in the process of constructing its fiber opticsinfrastructure from the Bay Bridge to Parole located on SHA right-of-way in two segments, (1) alongMD Route 50 from the \Villiam Preston Lane Memorial Bridge to the Severn River and (2) along MDRoute 450 from the Severn River into the Maryland State Goldstein Treasury Building (collectivelyRoutes 450 and 50 Project). This type of arrangement would normally be structured with a for-profitagency as a Resource Sharing Agreement: the for-profit agency would build the laterals and theconstruction costs would be negotiated on a barter or resource sharing basis without any monetarycompensation from the State for the laterals or from the provider for the use of the State right-of-way.In this case, Maryland law provides MDBC with special access to the SHA right-of-way and the Stateneeded additional fibers as the original 12 fibers provided to the State under the Original MOU were notsufficient for purposes of implementing the Routes 450 and 50 Projects. Through multiple jointdiscussions between MDOT, SHA and Dolt, it was determined to be in the State's best interest to haveMDBC co-build and co-locate State-o\\11ed fiber at the same time that MDBC was constructing itsnetwork infrastructure. By doing so, the reliability and structural integrity of the State's infrastructurewould be ensured. The State would realize fewer disruptions on the affected highways \vhich in turnwould increase the safety of the travelling public. Further, the compatibility of operational andmaintenance requirements would also be ensured. In addition, having MDBC perform this work while itwas also constructing its network infrastructure was found to be extremely cost-effective. Again, sinceMaryland law provides MDBC \\lith special access to the SHA right-of-way, SHA agreed to pay forthese laterals at a reduced cost.

Construction of these two laterals was incorrectly approved as an extension of the Original MOU. Thework along Route 50 has been completed and approved by the State. The work along Route 450 isapproximately fifty percent (50%) completed by MDBe and the completed work has been reviewed andapproved by the State. For the Routes 450 and 50 Project, MDOT agreed to pay MDBC the amount of$350,000 ($189,000 for Route 450 and $161,000 for Route 50). Upon completion of the work, thesefiber segments are o\'med by the State and all subsequent maintenance, repair, upgrade and operation isthe State's responsibility.

On or about December 2009, MDOT became aware that several MDBC invoices for the Routes 450 and50 Project could not be paid because the requisition had been rejected by the Comptroller's Office dueto the amount of the invoice and the lack ofa valid contract. The State has not paid for any work relatedto this contract even though a portion of the work was completed in 2009. Further, MDBC has not paidsome of its subcontractors for the work; it is waiting for payment from the State. From the period ofJanuary 2010 until August 2010, SHA, MDOT, DolT staff and counsel met on numerous occasions todiscuss the Original MOU and the Routes 450 and 50 Project. As a result of these meetings, it wasdetermined that the Routes 450 and 50 Project was incorrectly, but in good faith, deemed within theOriginal MOU. The agreement to install the Routes 450 and 50 Project should have been deemed a solesource award that required BPW approval.

123

ITEM: 13-C (Continued)

33

BPW - 10/20/10REVISEDSUPPLEMENTAL

IT staff has stated that MDBe was the only organization that was constructing fiber optic infrastructurein SHA's right of way along Routes 450 and 50 at the time this work was performed. Because the mainfor-profit telecommunication providers are members of MDBe and due to numerous communicationswhereby these providers stated to the State that it would not be cost effective to provide fiber in theareas from Routes 450 and 50 and the Bay Bridge to the Eastern Shore, it is the opinion of IT staff thatno providers other than MDBe would be in a position to perform this work in this manner.

With the construction and installation of Routes 450 and 50 Project, the State will be able tointerconnect three unique and distinct State communications networks comprising of networkMarylandoperated by the DolT, MOOT enterprise network, and Public Safety Interoperability Network (PSINet)to connect \\'ired and wireless infrastructure and even to assist local governmental entities as the needmay arise. The cost to the State for its share to construct these laterals has been determined by ITpersonnel to be fair and reasonable. In fact, procuring these services through MDBC achieved a savingsof almost of at least $500,000 by the State. In addition, according to IT personnel, because the work forthese fiber optic strands is been performed by MDBC, it ensures infrastructure reliability, minimizesimpact to motorist's safety, and minimizes disruption to SHA right-of-way.

The Original MOU will be presented to the BPW for retroactive approval on a separate agenda item.

FUNDSOURCE:

APPROPRIATION CODE:

RESIDENT BUSINESS:

MDTAXCLEARANCE:

100% Special FlUlds

JOIAOlO3

Yes

10-4666-1110

BOARDOF PUBLICWORKS ACTION - THE ABOVEREFERENCED ITEM WAS:

CVEy DISAPPROVED DEFERRED WITHDRAWN

---- ''liTH DISCUSSION WITHOUT DISCUSSION 1i ,1

BPW - 10/20/10

DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICESACTION AGENDA

CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT MODIFICATION

ITEM I-C-MOD

DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES

CONTRACT NO. AND TITLE

ORIGINAL CONTRACT APPROVED

CONTRACTOR

Rockville District Court Multi ServiceCenter (DCMSC)Rockville, MD

Project No. BC-725-992-002;New Construction-Rockville District CourtConstruct New Montgomery CountyDistrict Court/Multi-Service Centerat RockvilleADPICS NO. COD41911

10115/2008 DGS/BPW Item I-C

Coakley and Williams Construction Inc.Gaithersburg, MD

CONTRACT DESCRIPTION Construction contract award includes alllabor and materials necessary to construct a 167.072GSF District Court facility in downtownRockville, to service a portion of Montgomery County. Work to include the demolition of theOld Rockville Library and construction of nine (9) courtrooms, four (4) meeting/multi-purposerooms, court room holding areas, offices for judicial administration, court clerks, countycommissioners, advocates services, public defenders offices, parole and probationlDDMP, DGSmaintenance, and secure parking.

MODIFICATION DESCRIPTION Change Order 74 covers the cost to addglazing to the corridor side of the curtain wall on the third floor areas the Rockville DCMSClocated in Montgomery County, MD. (See Remarks below)

TERM OF ORIGINAL CONTRACT

TERM OF MOlliFICATION

AMOUNT OF ORIGINAL CONTRACT

AMOUNT OF MODIFICATION

PRIOR MODlFICATIONS/OJ'TlONS

730 Calendar Days

N/A

$59,939,300.00

$105,687.00

$1,303,964.26

2HPW -10/20/10


CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT MODIFICATION

ITEM I-C-MOD (Cont.)

REVISED TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT

PERCENT +/- (fHIS MODIFICATION)

OVERALL PERCENT

ORIGINAL PROCUREMENT METHOD

ORIGINAL MBE PARTICIPATION

$61,348,951.26

0,11%

2.35%


40.42%

REMARKS The work is necessary because NFPA 101and 18C-404 Atrium's code requires the rating separation between the atrium and office spaceon the third floor. The glazing surface must be continuous from top to bottom and fire protectedwith a "sheet" of water.

This modification will add glazing (3/8" tempered glass) to the corridor side of curtain wall on,the third floor (office space and elevator lobby) areas in accordance with RFI #17. Curtain walls8 and 21 are approximately 200 If of a 12' high curtain wall. These curtain walls also have acontinuous set of four foot long light fixtures that have to be mounted with stainless steel spacersone inch away from the glass surface.

FUND SOURCE

RESIIJENT BUSINESS

MD TAX CLEARANCE

MCCHL 2008/ltem 015 (Provide funds 10complete design, construct, and equip a newdistrict court facility in Rockville-Montgomery County)

Yes

10-5626-1111


C:ROVEi> DISAPPROVED DEFERRED WITHDRAWN

WITH DISCUSSION WITHOUT DISCUSSION

126

3BPW - 10/20/10



ITEM 2-M

DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES

CONTRACT NO. AND TITLE

Annapolis Public Buildings & GroundsAnnapolis and Crownsville, MD

Snow Removal Services;ADPICS NO. 00lBI400256

I>ESCRIPTION Approval is requested for a contract toprovide Snow Removal Services for the Annapolis and Crownsville facilities.

PROCUREMENT METHOD

BIDS OR I'ROI'OSALSFerguson Trenching Company. Inc.Odenton, MDeTa Enterprises dba CT Battle EnterpriseDistrict Heights, MD

AWARD

TERM

AMOUNT

MBE PARTICIPATION

PERFORMANCE BOND

Competitive Sealed Bidding

AMOUNT$142,730.00

$539,665.00

Ferguson Trenching Co., Inc.Odenton, MD

11/1/2010-10/31/2011 (W/4 one-yearrenewal options)

$142,730.00 (1 Year Base Contract)$142,730.00 (lSI renewal option)$142,730.00 (2"' renewal option)$142,730.00 (3" renewal option)$142,730.00 (4lh renewal option)$713,650.00 (TotaI5-Years)

None

N/A

REMARKS A notice of availability ofa Invitation forBids (IFB) was posted on DOS's Web Site, Bid Board and eMaryland Marketplace.com. Copiesof the solicitation were mailed or emailed to 482 prospective bidders.

1~7

4BPW - 10/20110



ITEM 2-M (Con!.)

Two responsive and responsible bid was received on September 8, 2010.

The recommended contractor Ferguson Trenching Co., Inc. is the incumbent. Its bid wasdetermined to be responsive and responsible. Ferguson Trenching has provided satisfactoryservice in the prior years.

FUND SOURCE

RESIDENT BUSINESS

TAX COMPLIANCE NO.

HOO331510814(DOS Operating Funds)

Yes

10-5477-1111


FOV~ DISAPPROVED DEFERRED WITHDRAWN

•• WITHDISCUSSION ITHOUTDISCUSSION

1;;8

5BPW - 10/20/10


REAL PROPERTY

ITEM 3-RP

MILITARY IlEI'ARTMENT Frostburg Armory0.7760 acres-Allegany CountyFile # 00-8240

REFERfl:NCE Approval is requested to declare surplus andtransfer two parcels of property surrounding the Frostburg Armory, located on the South side ofWater Street in Allegany County to the City of Frostburg. The City of Frostburg began leasingthe Frostburg armory property, consisting of three parcels in 1981. The Attorney General'sOffice discovered in 2008 that the main armory parcel containing the armory building hadreverted back to the City of Frostburg per a reversion clause contained in a 1949 deed from theCity of Frostburg to the State. This reversion did not apply to the two small parcels nowrequested for transfer. The City of Frostburg has leased and maintained the armory property forover 29 years. The property is currently used as a community gymnasium; as offices. amaintenance garage and equipment yard for the City's Street Department; and office space isalso leased to the Maryland Department of the Environment. The two parcels requested fortransfer lie adjacent to the City's community park and historic Frostburg community pool.

The Agreement of Sale has been approved by the Office of the Attorney General. Title andtransfer documents are subject to legal review.

GRANTOR

GRANTEE

PROPERTY

I'RICE

The State of Maryland. to the use of theMilitary Department

The City of Frostburg, a body politic

0.7760 +1- acres unimproved

No consideration

APPRAISEIl VALUES$50,000.00 - 21212010; Michael P. Bowers - Fee AppraiserReviewed by David M. Kelleher

REMARKS

I. The State Military Department recommends this transfer.

6BPW - 10/20/10

DEPARTMENTOF GENERALSERVICESACTIONAGENDA

REAL PROPERTY

ITEM 3-RP (Cont.)

2. The Clearinghouse conducted an intergovernmental review of the project under MD20090611-0783 and has recommended to declare the propeny surplus and transfer it to the City ofFrostburg.

3. The Maryland Historical Trust has determined that this transfer will have "no elTect" onhistoric properties.


eROVv DISAPPROVED DEFERRED WITHDRAWN

- WITHDISCUSSION e-HOUT DISCUSSION')

130

7BPW - 10/20/10


REAL PROPERTY

ITEM 4-RP

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Linda S. DeremerJames F.DavisRosemary T. Davis145.486:f: acres-Allegany CountyFile#00-4194/POS# 4108

REFERENCE Approval is requested to accept anAgreement of Sale on behalf of Program Open Space to purchase a 145.486 acre ::t: parceladjacent to Warrior Mountain WMA in Allegany County. The tract adjoins approximately 1500feet of existing boundary line along Cresap Mill Road. Conservation of the Deremer propertywill safeguard wildlife habitat and provide opportunities for public access and hunting whilehelping to protect a large area of the WMA from development impacts that are occurring alongCresap Mill Road. Protection of this property will create a significant contiguous block ofinterior forest with the adjoining State lands. Moreover, it will provide a butTer to the adjoiningSandstone Glades, a unique natural community that supports rare flower species. It will alsoprotect the headwaters of Frog Hollow Run from development. thereby providing watershedprotection at a critical area within the Potomac River Basin. The parcel is located within theTarget Ecological Area (TEA), and has received an ecological ranking of 120 under the ProgramOpen Space Targeting System.

Title will be vested in the Department of Natural Resources. The Attorney Generals Office hasapproved the Agreement of Sale. Title and transfer documents are subject to legal review.

GRANTOR

GRANTEE

PROI'ERTY

PRICE

Linda S. Deremer, James F. Davis, andRosemary T. Davis

Department of Natural Resources (DNR)

145.486 acres (unimproved)

$504,000' ($3464.25/acre)(Discounted Sale)

.The sales price represents a negotiated discount from the recommended value ($531,000) to theState of Maryland of $27,000 or 5.08%.

131

8BPW - 10/20/1 0


REAL PROPERTY

ITEM 4-RP (Cont.) (Revised)

APPRAISED VALVES$531,000 - Michael P.Goodfelllow - Fee Appraiser - 5/12/10Reviewed by Daniel E. Green

$531,000 - James L. Randall- Fee Appraiser - 5/24/1 0Reviewed by Daniel E. Green

FUNDSOVRCE $504,000.00 POS Opportunity Loan2009/ltem 500

REMARKS1. The Department of Natural Resources recommends approval of this acquisition.

2. This project meets criteria in accordance ",,:ithChapter 419, Laws of Maryland 2009 as itpresents a unique acquisition opportunity as a result of the extraordinary location andenvironmental value of the property which scored 120 under the Program Open SpaceTarget ecological scoring system.

3. Unnecessary language removed.



~ROVE~ DISAPPROVED DEFERRED WITHDRAWN

EISCUSSI? WITHOUT DISCUSSION

132

9BPW - 10120/10


REAL PROPERTY

ITEM 5-RP

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Evans WharfLLC.Dorchester CountyVienna Greenbelt Project-File # 422 I

REFERENCE Approval is requested to accept anassignment of an agreement of sale from The Conservation Fund for the purchase of the abovecaptioned property in the Town of Vienna, Dorchester County. The property contains 0.25 acres+/- and fronts for approximately 28 feet on the east side ofWaler Street and 82 feet on the westside of the Nanticoke River. The property is improved with a two story residential structurecontaining 1,216 square feet. The purchase of this property represents a unique opportunity toconserve the sole remaining parcel needed to complete the Vienna Waterfront Park as an integralpart of the Vienna Greenbelt Project. This acquisition will allow the Town of Vienna to extendthe Vienna Riverwalk and connect to the Town's Greenbelt located to the south. It will provideopportunities for environmental interpretation as well as direct public access to the NanticokeRiver.

The Nanticoke River is a premier component of the newly established Captain John SmithChesapeake National Historic Trail, and appears much as it did when Captain Smith explored theriver 400 years ago, in June, 1608. In order to ensure the stewardship of this tremendousresource, the States of Maryland and Delaware recently signed a historic partnership agreementto achieve collaborative goals of a healthy and productive Nanticoke River. In this agreement,the States agreed to "identify opportunities to improve low-impact recreational activities alongthe River; and foster environmental education and stewardship opportunities for residents,schools, area businesses, organizations, visitors and recreation users.

The Town of Vienna has taken a leadership role in planning a waterfront "Discovery Center" thatwill serve as an ecotourism driver to surrounding communities and amenity to families wishingto experience the trail. This project is a further extension of the Vienna Greenbelt project and lieswithin the designated Nanticoke-Marshyhope Focus Area and the Target Ecological Area (TEA),and has received ecological ranking score of 105 under the new Program Open Space TargetingSystem. Title will be vested in the name of the Town of Vienna.

Approval is requested for reimbursement of the following expenses to The Conservation Fund:Title fees $ 460.00Appraisals $ 1,120.00Administrative Fees $ 9,600.00(3% of purchase price) $11,180.00 Total

10BPW - 10/20/1 0


REAL PROPERTY


The Assignment of Agreement of Sale has been approved by the Office of the Attorney General.Title and transfer agreements are subject to legal review.

GRANTOR

GRANTEE

PROPERTY

The Conservation Fund

The State of Maryland, to the use of theDepartment of Natural Resources

0.25 acres +/- improved

PRICE $320,000.00'The sales price represents a negotiate discount from the recommended value ($350,000.00) to theState of Maryland of $30,000.00 or 8.6%.

APPRAISED VALUES$360,000.00 Gary Westholm-3/27/2009-Fee AppraiserReviewed by D. E. Green

$350,000.00 William J. Lefort 7/20/2010-Fee AppraiserReviewed by D. E. Green

FUND SOURCE $331,180.00 POS Opportunity Loan2009/1tem 500


2. This project meets criteria in accordance \\'ith Chapter 419, Laws of Maryland 2009 as itpresents a unique acquisition opportunity as a result of the extraordinary location andenvironmental and historic value of the property which scored 105 under the ProgramOpen Space Target ecological scoring system.


IIBPW - 10/20110


REAL PROPERTY

ITEM 5-RP(Cont.)(Revised)



eROVED2 DISAPPROVED DEFERRED WITHDRAWN. 'THDISCUSSION WITHOUTDISCUSSION

12BPW - 10/20/10


REAL PROPERTY

ITEM 6-RP

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH ANDMENTAL HYGIENE

Walter P. Carter Center630 West Fayette St.Baltimore, MD-DGS File: 00-8453

REFERENCE Approval is requested to transfer the propertylocated at 630 West Fayette St., Baltimore, MD to University System of Maryland (USM), onbehalf of the University of Maryland, Baltimore (VMS) in accordance with SF&P Article 1O~304.Currently, this property is occupied by the University of Maryland Medical Systems (UMMS)which operates a methadone clinic in the building. The property consists of 1.593 acres +/-improved with a seven story building containing 301,495 square reet with parking. This facilityoccupies a central location on the UMS campus and is directly opposite the UMS Dental Schooland the planned Health Sciences Facility III. UMS will locate research facilities on to the WalterP. Carter Site.

PROPERTY

GRANTOR

GRANTEE

REMARKS

1.593 +/- acres - improved with 30 I,495 sfbuilding

State of Maryland, to the use of theDepartment of Health and Mental Hygiene

State of Maryland, to the use of UniversitySystem of Maryland and the University ofMaryland-Baltimore

1. The Department of Health and Mental Hygiene has detennined that this property will beexcess to its needs with the construction ofa new state of the art Forensic Medical Center.

2. The Clearinghouse conducted an intergovernmental review of the project underMD20100108-0020 and has recommended that the Maryland Department of GeneralServices work with the University System of Maryland to explore the transfer of the WalterP. Carter Center (locate at 630 West Fayette Street, Baltimore, Maryland) to the UniversitySystem of Maryland for research, green space and a pedestrian pathway. It is alsorecommended that the University System of Maryland discuss with the Baltimore EconomicDevelopment Corporation the future use of the site and the impact of development in theWestside Initiative area.

13BPW - 10/20/10


REAL PROPERTY


If the University System of Maryland is unable to acquire the property. it is furtherrecommended to declare the property surplus to the State, and offer the property for publicsale. The University of Maryland Medical System has operated a methadone clinic in thebuilding for many years and continues to do so. The Department of Health and MentalHygiene operated the building for all ofFY 2010. On July 1,2010. the Department enteredinto a formal ""Tinen Right of Entry with the University of Maryland Medical System so thatthey could operate the building and continue their clinics there.


<:;PROVED=, DISAPPROVED DEFERRED ITHDRA WN


1J7

14BPW - 10/20/10

DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICESACTION AGENIJA

REAL PROPERTY

ITEM 7-RP

IJEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Benny Gray Point Property226.8170 +/- acres-Charles CountyFile # 4165, POS # 3946

REFERENCE Approval is requested for an Agreement ofSale from The Nature Conservancy for the acquisition of226.8 J 70 acres +1- of a property knownas Benny Gray Point for inclusion into Doncaster State Forest in Charles County. Thisacquisition will be managed by the Maryland Forest Service and be incorporated into the broaderPotomac-Nanjemoy Conservation Area. For morc than two decades the State and itsconservation partners including The Nature Conservancy, have worked to protect the tidalPotomac's amazing array of state and globally rare species while appropriately balancing thepublic's desire for recreational use and access.

This project involves the strategic acquisition of land that will link existing large sections ofprotected landscape-scale forest blocks near Nanjemoy Creek and the Potomac River, furtherhelping to maintain small and large scale ecological integrity, safeguarding wildlife habitat, andprotecting the water quality of the Potomac River and the Chesapeake Bay. while also providingbetter natural resource access to the public. This parcel lies within the designated Potomac-Nanjemoy Focus Area and the Target Ecological Area (TEA) and has received an ecologicalranking of92 under the Program Open Space Targeting System.

The Assignment Agreement has been approved by the Office of the Attorney General. Title andtransfer documents are subject to legal review.

GRANTOR

GRANTEE

PROPERTY

PRICE

The Nature Conservancy

The State of Maryland. to the use of theDepartment of Natural Resources (DNR)

226.8170 +/- acres unimproved

$470,250.00'(Discounted Sale)

*The sales price represents a negotiated discount from the recommended value ($495,000.00) tothe State of Maryland of $24,750.00 or 5%.

15BPW - 10/2011 0


REAL PROPERTY


APPRAISED VALUES$405,000.00 Melville E. Peters-6/30/201D-Fee AppraiserReviewed by William Beach

$562,500.00 Walter A. Reiter, Jr. -7/1/2010-Fee AppraiserReviewed by William Beach

FUND SOURCE $470,250.00 POS Opportunity Bond Loan2009/ltem 500$15,000 POS 81.20.03 Item 445


2. This project meets criteria in accordance with Chapter419, Laws of Maryland 2009 as itpresents a unique acquisition opportunity as a result of the extraordinary location andenvironmental value of the property which scored 92 under the Program Open SpaceTarget ecological scoring system.



5. Pursuantto Section 5-903(1) (iii) afthe Natural Resources Article, Annotated Code ofMaryland; Board approval is also requested for the use of up to $15,000.00 in pas funds.to protect water quality by implementing environmental improvements includingrestoration measures to stabilize the property after settlement.

ITHOUT DISCUSSION

DEFERRED


CROviji) DISAPPROVED

WITH DISCUSSION

WITHDRAWN

i,j9

16BPW - 10/20/10

IJEI'ARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICESACTION AGENDA

REAL PROPERTY

ITEM 8-RP

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, LICENSINGAND REGULATION

1790 Westwood Dr.Salisbury, MD-File # 8445

REFERENCE Approval is requested to surplus and grantan easement to the City of Salisbury in Wicomico County. The easement of 400 square feet is toplace a water meter vault on Department of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation property located at1790 Westwood Dr. in the City of Salisbury, Wicomico County. This new building on thisproperty will serve as an unemployment office. Title and transfer agreements are subject to legalreVIew,

GRANTOR

GRANTEE

PROPERTY

PRICE

The State of Maryland to the use of theDepartment of Labor, Licensing, andRegulation

City of Salisbury, Wicomico County MD

+/- 400 square feet

No consideration

APPRAISAL$700.00 Darryl Andrews (Staff appraisal) I0/20/20 IO/Reviewed by W.T. Beach

REMARKSI. The Department of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation agrees with this transaction.2. The Clearinghouse conducted an intergovernmental review of the project under

MD20 I00326-0222 and has determined that granting an utility easement of +/- 400square feet for the placement of a water meter is required for the provision of publicwater service to the new State building serving as an unemployment office under thecustodial care of the Maryland Department of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation, at 1790Westwood Drive, in Salisbury, MD.


eOVEi) DISAPPROVED DEFERRED WITHDRAWN


Uo

17BPW - 10/20110


LANDLORD LEASE

ITEM 9-LL

MARYLAND STATE POLICE Aviation CommandCalifornia, MDSt. Mary's County

Master Landlord Board of County Commissioners of 51. Mary's County23115 Leonard Hall DriveLeonardtown, MD 20650

Landlord Airtcc Inc.P.O. Box 40Hollywood, MD 20636

Property Location FBD Site ISt. Mary's County Regional AirportCalifornia, MD 20619

Space TvpeDurationAnnual Rent

Hangar/Office10 Years$38,866.80 (Avg.)

Lease Tvpe New Square Feet 5,880Effective 11/112010 Eff. Sq. Ft. Rate $10.60 (Avg.)Square Foot Rate $6.61 (Avg.)

Utilities ResponsibilityCustodial Responsibility

Fund Sources

TenantTenant

20 % General WOO 21601 3 130100180% Special W00216033 1301 001

SI'ECIAL CONDITIONS1. The lease contains two (2) option renewal terms of five (5) years subject to Board of

Public Works approval.

2. The lease contains a termination for convenience clause.

3. The lease provides parking at no cost.

RemarksI. The Maryland State Police Aviation Command will occupy this hangar and office space

for its MEDVAC Unit, Trooper 7 Helicopter on a 24/7 schedule 365 days a year. Thenew hangar provides living quarters for pilots and paramedics assigned. Trooper 7Helicopter will serve citizens ofSt. Mary's County as well as the general populationwithin a 50 mile radius of this site.

]. , .., I

18BPW - 10/20/10


LANDLORD LEASE

ITEM 9-LL (ConL)

2. The hangar space consist of two (2) floors approximately 78' x 60' with a ceiling heightof20'to accommodate the new and larger helicopter which requires a higher ceilingheight and provides the operational space requirement of the Aviation Command whichmandates helicopter hangars provide adequate space to house two (2) helicopters at thesame time during times of emergencies. There is office space and living quarters on two(2) floors approximately 78' x IS' for MSP pilots and paramedics. MSP currently hasfive (5) pilots and five (5) paramedics for this 24/7 operation.

3. The rcnt commences at $27,106.80 for the first years and increases to $38,220.00 for year2 through 4; and $41,160.00 for years 5 through 10.

4. Trooper 7 responded to 524 service calls in the past year.

ITHOUT DISCUSSION

DEFERRED


(APPROVED:> DISAPPROVED

WITH DISCUSSION

WITHDRAWN

142

19BPW - 10/20110


TENANT LEASE

ITEM IO-LT-OPT

MARYLAND STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONMARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRSBaltimore City

Landlord

"TaDem Location

Melvin GreenwaldBenjamin K. Greenwaldtla Greenwald & Company, Inc.250 West Pratt Street, Suite 850Baltimore, MD 21201

213 West Fayette StreetBaltimore, MD 2120 I

Space TypenurationAnnual Rent

Garage Parking2 YearsS205,380.00

Lease Type RenewalEffective 11/1/2010Rate/Space/Month S105.00"rev Rate/SpacelMonth $105.00

Number of SpacesMSDE 162MDVA_ITotal 163

Utilities ResponsibilityCustodial Responsibility

Previous Board Actions

Fund Sources

Itemarks

LandlordLandlord

Arrow Parking: 5/21/08-17 LT; 111I2/03-(8-L & 9-L);12119/01-(12-L&13-L); 1I110/99-(12-L& 13-L);9/10/97-16-L; 11/15/95-17-L; 7/28/93-19-L;8/14/91-28-L; 5/2/90-12-L; 12/30/87-19-L; 6/4/86-57-L.

MSDE 100% General ROB5761MDVA 100% General D55 08 II BA 0705

1. MSDE has been using this parking garage since January 1988 and MDVA has been usingthis parking garage since December 1999.

2. The number of spaces complies with the 3: 1 ratio established for this area.

3. The lease contains a termination for convenience clause.

143

20BPW - 10/20/10


TENANT LEASE

ITEM IO-LT-OPT (Cant.)

4. This space was acquired by sole source in accordance with the DOS Space ManagementManual, Paragraph 6-605 E., as authorized by COMAR 21.02.05.05. The Department ofGeneral Services, in conjunction with the using Agency. recommends the approval of thisitem.


GROVEQ:) DISAPPROVED DEFERRED WITHDRAWN


21BPW - 10/20/1 0•

DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICF.SACTION AGENDA

CAPITAL GRANTS AND LOANS

ITF.M ll-CGL

RECOMMENDATION That the Board of Public Works enler into a grant agreement, andauthorize that funds be encumbered for the following grant:

Board of Directors of the Arbutus Volunteer Fire Department, fnc. (Baltimore County)Arbutus VFD Hall"For the repair and renovation of the Arbutus Volunteer Fire Department flail. "

$/00,000.00Maryland Consolidated Capital Band Loan 012010 (Lill - Chapter 483, Acts 012010)DGS Item 032, (SL-008-IOO-038)

MATCHING FUND No match is required. The MeeBL requires the grant recipient toprovide grant documents no later than June I, 2012.

BACKGROUND Total Project10.032 (This Action)Local Cost

$191,000.00$100,000.00$ 91,000.00

REMARKS(I) This action is in accordance with the enabling legislation and complies with the tax-exempt bond provisions of the Internal Revenue Code.

(2) The grant recipient shall consult with the Maryland Historical Trust pursuant to Sections5A-325 to 328, State Finance and Procurement Article, Annotated Code of Maryland, andconvey a perpetual preservation easement pursuant to the tenns of the enabling legislation.

(3) Invoices should be submitted to the Department of General Services for the disbursementof funds.

WITHOUT DISCUSSION

145

WITHDRAWNDEFERRED

WITH DISCUSSION


('APPROVED;> DISAPPROVED

22BPW - 10120/10



ITEM 12-CGL

RECOMMENDATION That the Board of Public Works certify matching funds, enter into agrant agreement, and authorize that funds be encumbered for the following grant.

Board oj Direc/ors of tile National Center on Instilutions QndAltemotb'es,/nc.(Baltimore County)Automotive Vocational Training Center"For the planning. design. construction, and capital equipping of the AutomotiveVocational Training Center, located;1/ Baltimore. "SIOO,OOO.OOMaryland Consolidated Capital Bond Loan of2010 (LJ/l- Chapter 483. Acts of2010)DGS Item G116. SL-020-090-038

MATCHING FUND The MeeBL requires the grant recipient to provide a matchingfund and the Board of Public Works to ccrtify a matching fund no later than June 1, 2012.The Board of Directors of the National Center on Institutions and Alternatives, Inc. hassubmitted documentation that it has in excess $100,000.00 in a financial institution tomeet the matching fund requirement for this project.

BACKGROUND

REMARKS

Total Project10-G1I6 (This Action)09-G052 (Prior Action)09-G 103 (Prior Action)Local Cost

$695,000.00$100,000.00$100.000.00$125,000.00$370.000.00

(1) The grant agreement has been modified to reflect U Asset Management, LLC asbeneficiary throughout the document.

(2) This action is in accordance with the enabling legislation and complies with the tax-exempt bond provisions of the Internal Revenue Code.

(3) The grant recipient shall consult with the Maryland Historical Trust pursuant to Sections5A-325 to 328, State Finance and Procurement Article, Annotated Code of Maryland, andconvey a perpetual preservation easement pursuant to the terms of the enabling legislation.

146

23BPW - 10/20/10



ITEM 12-CGL (Cont.)

(4) The Comptroller may not disburse State funds until after the Comptroller verifies that thegrant recipient has expended the matching fund and the required amount for reimbursement.

WITHOUT DISCUSSION

DEFERRED


(APPROVED:) DISAPPROVED

WITH DISCUSSION

WITHDRAWN

147

24BPW - 10/20/10


CArnAL GRANTS AND LOANS

ITEM 13-CGL

RECOMMENDATION That the Board of Public Works certify matching funds, enter into agrant agreement, and authorize thai funds be encumbered for the following grant.

Board of Directors o/the Coordinating Center for Home & Community Care, Inc.(Anne Arundel Couno~Coordinating Center for Home and Community Care Building Facilities"For the acquisition. planning, design. capital equipping. and build.out of the buildingfacilities of the Coordinating Center for Home and Community Care in Millersville. "

$200,000.00Maryland Consolidated Capital Bond Loan of2010 (LSI - Chapter 483, Acts of2010)DGS Item G024, SL-017-090-038

MATCHING FUND The MeeHL requires the grant recipient to provide a matchingfund and the Board of Public Works to certify a matching fund no later than June 1,2012.The Board of Directors of the Coordinating Center for Home & Community Care,lnc.has submitted documentation that it has in excess $200,000.00 in a financial institution tomeet the matching fund requirement for this project.

BACKGROUND Total Project $460.000.0010-G024 (This Action) $200,000.0009-G090 (Prior Action) $ 30,000.00Local Cost $230.000.00(Prior Action: 2/24/10 Agenda, Item 10-CGL)

REMARKS(1) This action is in accordance with the enabling legislation and complies with the tax-exempt bond provisions of the Internal Revenue Code.(2) The grant recipient shall consult with the Maryland Historical Trust pursuant to Sections5A-325 to 328, State Finance and Procurement Article, Annotated Code of Maryland, andconvey a perpetual preservation easement pursuant to the tenns of the enabling legislation.(3) The Comptroller may not disburse State funds until after the Comptroller verifies that thegrant recipient has expended the matching fund and the required amount for reimbursement.


(APPROVE~ DISAPPROVED DEFERRED WITHDRAWN

WITH DISCUSSION <!ITHOUT D1SCUSSlo0

148

25BPW - 10/20110



ITEM 14-CGL

RECOMMENDATION That the Board of Public Works certify matching funds, enter intogrant agreement, and authorize that funds be encumbered for the following grant:

County Commissioners of Frederick COllntyFrederick County Detention Center"To assist in the Phase IV expansion and renovation a/the Frederick County DetentionCenter. "S70I,000.00Maryland Consolidated Capital Bond Loan oJ1008 (Chapter 336. Acts oJ1008;amended by Chapter 483. Acts oJ1010)-DGS Item G107, (CJ-001-080-038)

MATCHING FUND The MeeBl requires the grant recipient to provide a matchingfund and the Board of Public Works to certify a matching fund no laterthan June 1,2010.The County Commissioners of Frederick County have submitted documentation that$1,743,495.00 has been appropriated for this project through their Fiscal Year 2010Capital Budget. Documents for certification of match were received by the Departmentof General Services prior to May 31. 2010.

BACKGROUND Total Projecl $2,808,495.0008-G207 (This Aclion) $ 701,000.0005-G062 (Prior Action $ 364,000.00Local Cost $1,743,495.00(Prior Action: 5/9/07 Agenda, Item 14-CGL.I.)

REMARKS(1) This action is in accordance with the enabling legislation and complies with the tax-exempt bond provisions of the Internal Revenue Code.(2) The grant recipient shall consult with the Maryland Historical Trust pursuant to Sections5A-325 to 328, State Finance and Procurement Article, Annotated Code of Maryland, andconvey a perpetual preservation easement pursuant to the terms of the enabling legislation.(3) The Comptroller may not disburse State funds until after the Comptroller verifies that thegrant recipient has expended the matching fund and the required amount for reimbursement.

ITHOUT DISCUSSION

DEFERRED


<:;PROVED=:;> DISAPPROVED

WITH DISCUSSION

ITHDRAWN

149

26BPW - 10/20/10



ITEM 15-CGL

RECOMMENDATION That the Board of Public Works enter into a grant agreement, andauthorize that funds be encumbered for the following grant:

Mayor and City Council oJthe City oj Glellort/en (Prince George's County)Glellarden Senior Center"For the construction, repair, and renovation a/the Glenarden Senior Center, locatedin G/enarden. "

550,000.00Marylalld COllsolidated Capital BOlld Loall of2010 (LHI- Chapter 483, Acts of2010)DGS Item 038. (SL-009-100-038)

MATCHING FUND No match is required. The MCCBL requires the grant recipient toprovide grant documents no later than June 1, 20 J 2.

BACKGROUND Tota! Project10-038 (This Action)Local Cost

$192,000.00$ 50,000.00$142,000.00

REMARKS(I) This action is in accordance with the enabling legislation and complies with the tax-exempt bond provisions of the Internal Revenue Code.(2) The grant recipient shall consult with the Maryland Historical Trust pursuant to Sections5A-325 to 328, State Finance and Procurement Article, Annotated Code of Maryland, andconvey a perpetual preservation easement pursuant to the terms of the enabling legislation.(3) Invoices should be submitted to the Department of General Services for the disbursementof funds.

WITHOUT DISCUSSION

DEFERRED

150

WITHDRAWN


<A:PROVED:) DISAPPROVED

WITH DISCUSSION

27BPW - 10/20/10


CAPn AL GRANTS ANn LOANS

ITEM 16-CGL

RECOMMENDATION ThaI the Board of Public Works certify matching funds, enter into agrant agreement, and authorize that funds be encumbered for the following grant:

Board of Directors of tile Friends of Old Waldorf Scllool Foundation, Inc_(Charles County)Old Waldorf School Community Center"For the constnlClion, repair. renovation, reconstruction and capital equipping of theOld WaldorfSdlOolfor use as a community center, located in Waldorf"

$100,000_00Maryland Consolidated Capital Bond Loan oj 2007 (LSI - Chapter 488. Acts of 2007 andas amended by Chapter 372, Acts of2010) DGS Ilem G128, SL-081-070-038

MATCHING FUND The MCCBL requires the grant recipient to provide a matchingfund and the Board of Public Works to certify a matching fund no later than June I, 2012.The Board of Directors of the Friends of Old Waldorf School Foundation, Inc. hassubmitted evidence in the form of canceled checks and invoices that it has $76, )75.80 ineligible expenditures, $63,332.00 of in-kind donations for a total of$139,507.80 to meetthe matching fund requirement for this project.

Board of Public Works approval is also requested to reimburse the Board of Directors ofthe Friends of Old Waldorf School Foundation, Inc. $39,507.80 for eligible expenditures.

BACKGROUND Total Project $960,000.0007-G128 (This Action) $100,000.00o I-GOOO(Prior Action) $200,000.0095-GOOO(Prior Action) $100,000.00Local Cost $560,000.00(Prior Actions: 03113/02 Agenda, Item 30-CGL

REMARKS(I) This action is in accordance with the enabling legislation and complies with the tax-exempt bond provisions of the Internal Revenue Code.

(2) The grant recipient shall consult with the Maryland Historical Trust pursuant to Sections5A.325 to 328, State Finance and Procurement Article, Annotated Code of Maryland, andconvey a perpetual preservation easement pursuant to the terms of the enabling legislation.

151

28BPW - 10/20/10



ITEM 16-CGL (Cont.)


WITHOUT DISCUSSION

DEFERRED


eROVE~ DISAPPROVED

WITH DISCUSSION

WITHDRAWN

152

29BPW-10/20/10


CAI'ITAL GRANTS AND LOANS

ITEM I7-CGL

RECOMMENDATION That the Board of Public Works certify matching funds, enter into agrant agreement, and authorize that funds be encumbered for the following grant.

Board of Directors of the YMCA of Metropolitall Washingtoll, fnc•. (Montgomery County)YMCA Youth & Family Services Center"For the acquisition, design, repair. renovation and capital equipping a/the YMCAYouth & Fami(v Services Center, located in Silver Spring. "

SIOO,OOO,OOMaryland Consolidated Capitol Bond Loan of 2008 (Chopter 336, Acls of 2008)DGS Ilem G087SIOO,OOO,OOMaryland Consolidated Capital Bond Loan of 2008 (Chapler 336, Acls of 2008)DGS Ilem GI74, SL.087.080-038

MATCHING FUND The MeeBL requires the grant recipient to provide a matchingfund and the Board of Public Works to certify a matching fund no later than June I, 20 IO.The Board of Directors of the YMCA of Metropolitan Washington, Inc. has submitteddocumentation that Montgomery County has appropriated $200,000.00 in their FiscalYear 2009 budget to meet the matching fund requirement for this project. Documents forcertification of match were received by the Department of General Services prior to May31,2010.

IlACKGROUND Total Project08-G087 (This Action)08-G174 (This Action)Local Cost

$400,000.00$100,000,00$100,000,00$200,000.00

REMARKS(1) This action is in accordance with the enabling legislation and complies with the tax-exempt bond provisions of the Internal Revenue Code.

(2) The grant recipient shall consult with the Maryland Historical Trust pursuant to Sections5A-325 to 328, State Finance and Procurement Article, Annotated Code of Maryland, andconvey a perpetual preservation easement pursuant to the tenns of the enabling legislation.

30BPW - 10120/10


CArnAL GRANTS AND LOANS

ITEM 17-CGL (Cont.)


ITHOUT DISCUSSION

DEFERRED


(APPROVE0 DISAPPROVED

WITH DISCUSSION

WITHDRAWN

l:i4

There being no further business, the meeting of October 20, 2010 was adjourned.

Respectfully submitted,~

~ojSheila C. McDonald, Esq.Executive Secretary

INDEXOCTOBER20, 2010

Agriculture, Department ofAgricultural Cost Share Program 4-6

Aviation Administration 107Clerks of the Circuit Courts 35College Savings Plans 87Comptroller of the Treasury

Register of Wills 33Coppin State University 81-82Education, Department of... 9,143Environment, Department of 11-17,61Environmental Service, Maryland 28Environmental Trust, Maryland 30-31Food Center Authority, Maryland 18General Services, Department of 125

Capital Grants and LoansArbutus VFD Hall (Baltimore) 145Automotive Vocational Training Center (Baltimore) 146Coordinating Center for Home and Community Care Building

Facilities (Anne Arundel) 148Frederick County Detention Center 149Glenarden Senior Center (Prince George' s) 150Old Waldorf School Conununity Center (Charles) 151YMCA Youth & Family Services Center (Montgomery) 153

Public Buildings & Grounds, Annapolis 127Health & Mental Hygiene, Department of 85, 136Highway Administration 96-102,105Housing & Conununity Development 19-27Human Resources, Department of 58

Social Services Administration 68-74Information Technology, Department of... 89Judiciary

Clerks of the Circuit Courts 35Juvenile Services, Department of 65Labor, Licensing & Regulation, Department of... 140Maryland, University System of

Coppin State University 81-82Maryland, University of

Baltimore Campus 75,77College Park Campus 78,79

156

INDEXOCTOBER20, 2010

Military Department.. 129Natural Resources, Department of 29,131-135,138

CREPProgram 50-57Environmental TrusL. 30-31Program Open Space 42-44Rural Legacy Program 45-49

Public Safety & Correctional Services, Department of 83Public Works, Board of

Procurement Agency Activity Reports 7Public School Construction, lAC 32Wetlands Administration 8

Register of Wills .33Social Services Administration 68-74State Police, Department of 38-41,141Transportation, Department of 113,122

Aviation Administration 107Highway Administration 96-102,105Maryland Transit Administration 92,103,110,116-121Transportation Authority, Maryland 94

Veterans Affairs, Department of 143

157