minneapolis intervention project, 1986-1987

ICPSRInter-university Consortium for

Political and Social Research

Minneapolis Intervention Project, 1986 - 1987

Jeffery L. Edleson and Maryann Syers

ICPSR 9808

This document was previously available in a combination of ASCII and paper format.It was converted to Portable Document Format (PDF) on the date below as part ofICPSR’s CD-ROM project CD0033, supported by the National Institute of Justice.No additional updating of this collection has been performed.

October 2000

MINNEAPOLIS INTERVENTION PROJECT, 1986-1987

(ICPSR 9808)

Principal Investigators

Jeffrey L. Edleson and Maryann Syers University of Minnesota, Domestic Abuse Project

Second ICPSR Edition December 1994

Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research P.O. Box 1248 Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106

BIBLIOGRAPHIC CITATION

Publications based on ICPSR data collections should acknowledge those sources by means of bibliographic citations. To ensure that such source attributions are captured for social science bibliographic utilities, citations must appear in footnotes or in the reference section of publications. The bibliographic citation for this data collection is:

Edleson, Jeffrey L., and Maryann Syers. MINNEAPOLIS INTERVENTION PROJECT, 1986-1987 [Computer file]. Prepared by Sociometrics Corporation. 2nd ICPSR ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter- university Consortium for Political and Social Research [producer and distributor], 1994.

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION ON USE OF ICPSR RESOURCES

To provide funding agencies with essential information about use of archival resources and to facilitate the exchange of information about ICPSR participants' research activities, users of ICPSR data are requested to send to ICPSR bibliographic citations for each completed manuscript or thesis abstract. Please indicate in a cover letter which data were used.

DATA DISCLAIMER

The original collector of the data, ICPSR, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for uses of this collection or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses.

DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION

Jeffrey L. Edleson and Maryann Syers MINNEAPOLIS INTERVENTION PROJECT, 1986-1987 (ICPSR 9808)

SUMMARY: This collection investigates the impact of the increased activity of community intervention projects on the incidence of domestic abuse. In particular, the data provide an opportunity to evaluate the impact of police actions and court-ordered abuser treatment on the continued abuse of victims. The data file includes demographic information such as victim's age, race, and sex, and perpetrator's age, birthdate, relationship to the victim, sex, and physical or mental disabilities. Other variables describe the location and description of the incident, the number and gender of victims and perpetrators, and the outcome of the police intervention, i.e., arrest or nonarrest. Interviews with victims provided information regarding previous history of police intervention for domestic abuse, specific information about the violence suffered and resulting injuries, the frequency and type of abuse suffered in the six months prior to the violent incident in question, the type of police intervention used, and the victim's satisfaction with the responses of police. In addition, the 6- and 12-month interviews contain data regarding the change in the victim's relationship status since the last interview, satisfaction with the relationship, continued abuse and criminal justice involvement, use of support services by the victim or members of the victim's family, and satisfaction with these services.

UNIVERSE: All domestic abuse cases in two police precincts in Minneapolis, Minnesota, which were reported to the police and in which police visited the location of the incident.

SAMPLING: This study employed a longitudinal, three-wave, observational design. The data were drawn from police records of all domestic abuse cases reported over a 13-month period from February 1986 to March 1987 in two police precincts in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Among victims, almost all were female ranging in age from 15 to 70 years of age, and were mostly white, African American, or Native American. Among perpetrators, most were males ranging in age from 18 to 71 years and were mostly white or African American.

NOTE: The data collection instrument is available only in hardcopy form upon request from ICPSR.

EXTENT OF COLLECTION: 1 data file + machine-readable documentation (text) + SAS data definition statements + SPSS data definition statements + data collection instrument

EXTENT OF PROCESSING: MDATA.ICPSR/ RECODE/ UNDOCCHK.ICPSR/ CDBK.ICPSR/ DDEF.ICPSR/ REFORM.DATA/ SCAN

DATA FORMAT: Logical Record Length with SAS and SPSS data definition statements

Part 1: Data File Part 2: SAS Data Definition File Structure: rectangular Statements Cases: 528 Record Length: 75 Variables: 356 Record Length: 533 Records Per Case: 1

RELATED PUBLICATION: Syers, Maryann, and Jeffrey L. Edleson. "The Combined Effects of Coordinated Criminal Justice Intervention in Woman Abuse." JOURNAL OF INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE 7, 4 (December 1992), 490-502.

U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs National Institute of Justice

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE

DATA RESOURCES PROGRAM

JANUARY 1992 DATA SET JU.109

MINNEAPOLIS INTERVENTION PROJECT

Jeffrey L. Edleson Maryann Syers

A USER'S GUIDE

TO THE MACHINE-READABLE FILES AND DOCUMENTATION

Prepared by Sociometrics Corporation

Data Set JU.109

MINNEAPOLIS INTERVENTION PROJECT

AWARD NO. OJP-88-M-196

Original Investigator:

Jeffrey L. Edleson Maryann Syers

University of Minnesota Domestic Abuse Project 204 West Franklin Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55404

Documentation Produced by

Jennifer L. Van Hook James L. Peterson

Sociometrics Corporation

1st ed., 1991

Distributed by

Data Resources Program of the National Institute of Justice

Sociometrics Corporation 170 State Street, Suite 260 Los Altos, California 94022-2812 (415) 949-3282

ICPSR 9808 Page 5

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Minneapolis Intervention Project has been deposited at the Data Resources Program of the National Institute of Justice, Sociometrics Corporation, for public distribution, by Jeffrey L. Edleson and Maryann Syers of the University of Minnesota, Domestic Abuse Project. Data collection was funded by the National Institute of Justice under Award No. OJP-88-M-196. Funding for the work done by the Data Resources Program to prepare the data for public use was provided by the U. S. Office of Justice Programs under Contract No. OJP-89-C-008 to Sociometrics Corporation.

Users of the data are strongly urged to inform the Data Resources Program of any errors or discrepancies. They are further urged to bring to the attention of the Data Resources Program all problems and difficulties encountered, particularly those that may prevent effective and convenient use of the data.

All manuscripts based on data made available through the Data Resources Program should acknowledge that fact as well as cite the data set (see suggested citation format, inside front cover). Users of these data are urged to follow some adaptation of the following statement.

The data used in this publication were made available by the Data Resources Program of the National Institute of Justice, Sociometrics Corporation, 170 State Street, Suite 260, Los Altos, CA 94022-2812. The study entitled Minneapolis Intervention Project was conducted by Jeffrey L. Edleson and Maryann Syers, Domestic Abuse Project, Minneapolis, MN. Data collection was funded by the National Institute of Justice (Award No. OJP-88-M-196). Funding support for preparing the revised documentation for public distribution was provided by a contract (OJP-89-C-008) between the U. S. Office of Justice Programs and Sociometrics Corporation. The original investigators, funding agency, and the Data Resources Program are not responsible for the analyses or interpretations presented here.

To provide funding agencies with essential information about use of archival resources and to facilitate the exchange of information about Data Resources Program participants' research activities, each user of these resources is requested to send a copy of each completed manuscript, thesis abstract, or reprint to the Data Resources Program of the National Institute of Justice, Sociometrics Corporation, 170 State Street, Suite 260, Los Altos, CA 94022-2812.

ICPSR 9808 Page 7

SUMMARY

In the past two decades, the criminal justice system has altered its response to battered women and their assailants. This change has been encouraged in part by action taken by community intervention projects (CIP's), which have encouraged the use of police arrest and court ordered treatment for abuse or drug addiction in domestic abuse cases. This study investigates the impact of increased activity of CIP's on the incidence of domestic abuse. In particular, the researchers explore the impact of police arrest and court ordered treatment, in the context of CIP intervention with the court, police, victims, and assailants, on the degree to which domestic abuse offenders continue to abuse their victims.

The data are drawn from police records of all domestic abuse cases reported over a 13 month period from February 1986 to March 1987 in two police precincts in Minneapolis, Minnesota (n = 528). In addition, data regarding in part past abuse, the status of victims' relationships with their assailants, court action sought and obtained, and experiences with treatment groups, were collected by Minneapolis Intervention Project staff from the victims at the time of the initial police report (n = 479), as well as six months (n = 285) and one year (n = 179) following the initial police report. Throughout the entire data-collection period, the Minneapolis Intervention Project staff continually offered victims legal and personal advice and intervened with the police and court officials. The data are contained in one file and include 359 variables.

ICPSR 9808

GENERAL STUDY OVERVIEW

Source: Syers, Maryann and Jeffrey L. Edleson (1992, December). The combined effects of coordinated criminal justice intervention in woman abuse. JOURNAL OF INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE, 7(4), 490-502.

STUDY IDENTIFICATION

Minneapolis Intervention Project

Jeffrey L. Edleson and Maryann Syers

Domestic Abuse Project, University of Minnesota

Award No. OJP-88-M-196

KEY WORDS

Domestic abuse, community intervention projects, recidivism rates, court-ordered treatment.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

In the past two decades, the criminal justice system has altered its response to battered women and their assailants; it has shifted from viewing domestic violence as that which is out of the jurisdiction of public officials, to responding to domestic violence in somewhat the same way it responds to street violence. This change has been encouraged in part by action taken by community intervention projects (CIP's), which have encouraged the use of police arrest and court ordered treatment for abuse or drug addiction in domestic abuse cases. But the effects of police arrest and court action are unclear. In particular, findings regarding the impact of police arrest at first police visit are not consistent across studies.

This study investigates the impact of increased activity of CIP's on the incidence of domestic abuse. In particular, the researchers evaluate the impact of police arrest on first police visit and court ordered treatment for abuse or drug addiction on the degree to which domestic abuse offenders continue to abuse their victims. They investigate these effects in the context of CIP intervention with victims and court officials.

The data address the following questions:

1. What police actions (or inactions) on domestic assault calls result in fewer repeated incidents of violence against victims?

ICPSR 9808 Page 9

2. What court outcomes on domestic assault cases lead to decreased violence against victims?

3. What are the combined effects of police arrest and court-ordered treatment on domestic violence?

METHODS

Study Design

This study employed a longitudinal, three-wave, observational design. Over a 13 month period, all domestic abuse cases in two police precincts which were reported to the police and in which police visited the location of the incident were immediately reported to the Minneapolis Intervention Project (MIP). Victims in these cases were then immediately contacted by MIP staff and subsequently interviewed two more times, once six months after the initial incident, and again one year after the initial incident.

Initial contact with victims in cases in which the perpetrator was arrested was facilitated by local jails' agreement to hold domestic-abuse arrestees for several hours or until arraignment had been made the following morning. While perpetrators were held in jails, trained staff conducted telephone interviews with victims or interviewed them at home. When possible, staff also attempted to contact and interview victims in cases where police intervened but did not arrest the perpetrator.

Throughout the entire data-collection period, the Minneapolis Intervention Project staff continually offered legal and personal advice to some victims, as well as intervened with the police and court system. The Minneapolis Intervention Project was established in 1983. It currently serves the entire city of Minneapolis and is staffed by 8 full-time paid workers and 60 volunteers. In this particular study, MIP staff gave victims advice and assistance regarding orders for protection, court proceedings, shelters, and other services available at the time of the initial interview and during subsequent contacts. Some violent men were offered separate group treatment from DAP staff. MIP staff encouraged and enabled police, city attorneys and court officials to implement policies of police arrest and court-ordered treatment for assailants. In particular, police were encouraged to make an arrest whenever probable cause existed that domestic assault had occurred or whenever an order for protection had been violated. When given permission from the victim, MIP staff supplied information about the victim to prosecuting city attorneys during court proceedings. If the perpetrator issued a guilty plea or was convicted, MIP staff encouraged judges to agree to pre-sentencing investigations that would incorporate the assailant's history of violence and the victim's wishes into recommendations to the court. Finally, MIP staff asked judges to pronounce a sentence that includes imprisonment,

ICPSR 9808

and to stay part or all of the sentence pending successful completion of a batterer's treatment program as a condition of probation.

Sources of Information

Data were collected from multiple sources. Data were collected from reports filed by police following each arrest or intervention and from records kept by legal advocates as cases moved through the criminal justice system. In both arrest and nonarrest cases, police reports were made shortly after each incident and copies were sent to MIP staff. Data were also collected from personal or telephone interviews conducted with victims.

Sample

The data are drawn from police records of all domestic abuse cases reported over a 13 month period from February 1986 to March 1987 in two police precincts in Minneapolis, Minnesota (n = 528). Among victims, almost all were female (the researchers discarded any male victims for the purpose of their analysis), ranged from 15 to 70 years of age, and were mostly white, African/American, or Native/American. Among perpetrators, most were male, ranged from 18 to 71 years of age, and were mostly white and African/American.

Response Rates

Since all those eligible in the population during a given period of time were included as part of the study, a response rate is not appropriate. In terms of the rate at which subjects were retained throughout the study, 90.7% (479) victims were interviewed immediately after police contact, 54.0% (285) were interviewed at the 6 month follow-up, and 33.9% (179) were interviewed at the 1 year follow-up.

Dates of Data Collection

Case data collection began in February 1986 with the last new case added in March 1987. Follow-up data collection ended in March 1988.

SUMMARY OF CONTENTS

Description of Variables

Police reports and court records in the data file include demographic data, a location and description of the incident, the number and gender of victims and perpetrators, and the outcome of the police intervention (arrest or non-arrest). Interviews with victims provided further demographic information about the victim and perpetrator as well as data regarding previous history of police intervention for domestic abuse, specific information about the violence suffered and

ICPSR 9808 Page 11

resulting injuries, the frequency and type of abuse suffered in the 6 months prior to the violent incident in question, the type of police intervention used, and the victim's satisfaction with the responses of police. In addition, the 6 and 12 month interviews contain data regarding the change in the victim's relationship status since the last interview, satisfaction with the relationship, continued abuse and criminal justice system involvement, use of support services by the victim or members of her family, and satisfaction with these services.

Presence of Common Scales

None.

Unit of Observation

The unit of observation is the domestic abuse case. Only one primary victim and one perpetrator per case is recorded in the data file. However, the possibility exists that a single perpetrator may appear in multiple cases with different victims, or that a single victim may appear in multiple cases with different perpetrators.

Geographic Coverage

Two police precincts of Minneapolis, Minnesota

EVALUATION

Data Quality

Checks on data quality reveal that a large number of cases were not retained throughout the study. About 66% are missing by the time of the third contact with the victim. In addition, Tables 1.1 through 4.4 show that there are a large number of missing values among those victims followed up. In particular, in the section containing initial case information (variables V1 - V136), almost all variables contain over 10% missing values. Finally, about 14% of variables in the data file have out-of-range values, but for the great majority of these variables, the out-of-range values occur in only a handful of cases. See Tables 1.1 through 4.4 for more details.

Data Limitations

There are a large number of missing cases and missing values in the victim contact sections of the data. Unknown differences may exist between victims who were contacted and successfully interviewed and victims were not able to be contacted or declined to answer a question. Also, large portions of the data in the initial case information section are missing. The researchers recommend that investigators use this section of the data with caution (V1 - V136). Many of these data were drawn from existing agency, police, and court records in which data were frequently missing.

ICPSR 9808

Although not presented in tables, the data contain several inconsistencies across cases (i.e., some perpetrators coded as female for V146 are coded as male for V51). These inconsistencies are most likely due to coding errors. Again, the researchers suggest that the data regarding contact with the victim is more reliable than the initial case data.

Finally, note that these data do not allow the investigator to directly evaluate the effects of CIP advice and counselling for victims, since no data regarding an appropriate control group is available; the MIP intervened with all victims in this study. However, it may be possible to estimate the effects of intervention by comparing groups of victims who received varying amounts of aid.

REPORTS AND PUBLICATIONS

Syers, Maryann and Jeffrey L. Edleson (1992, December). The combined effects of coordinated criminal justice intervention in woman abuse. JOURNAL OF INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE, 7(4), 490-502.

ICPSR 9808 Page 13

DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT

This report corresponds to the data file: DA9808.P1

Table 1: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values* ======================================================================= Variable Name and Label Percent of Cases with (Total cases=528) Missing Values -----------------------------------------------------------------------

0.3% (1 of 356 variables) have 0% Missing Values

0.3% (1 of 356 variables) have > 0% - 1% Missing Values




V2 PERP'S VICTIMS INFORMATION PERTAINS TO 7.2% V159 1ST TIME POLICE CAME RE: VIOLENT INCDNT 8.5% V144M MONTH OF THE FIRST CONTACT 9.3% V175 STATUS OF RELATIONSHIP AT TIME OF INCDN 9.3% V144Y YEAR OF FIRST CONTACT 9.5%


V144D DAY OF THE FIRST CONTACT 10.2% V3 VICTIM IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 11.0% V4 PERPETRATOR IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 11.0% V174 HOW SATISFD WERE YOU WITH POLICE RESPNS 12.1% V7 PERPETRATOR ARRESTED THIS INCIDENT 12.5% V9 TOTAL NO. OF ALL VICT'S, THIS INCIDENT 12.7% V5 TOTAL NUMBER OF VICTIMS, THIS INCIDENT 13.1% V12M MONTH INCIDENT OCCURRED 13.3% V12D DAY INCIDENT OCCURRED 13.3% V12Y YEAR INCIDENT OCCURRED 13.3% V145 SEX OF THE VICTIM 13.3% V177 CURRENT STATUS OF THIS RELATIONSHIP 13.4% V10 TOTAL NO. OF ALL PERP'S, THIS INCIDENT 13.6% V15 PRECINCT OF OCCURRENCE 13.6% V147 RACE OF THE VICTIM 13.6% V184 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: SCRMD/SWORE/INSULTD 13.6% =======================================================================

ICPSR 9808

Table 1 (continued) ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- V188 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: THREW SOMETHING 13.8% V190 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: PUSHED/GRABBED/SHOV 13.8% V24D DAY RECEIVED 14.2% V186 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: PHYS THREATENED YOU 14.2% V24M MONTH RECEIVED 14.4% V24Y YEAR RECEIVED 14.4% V187 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: THREATND TO KILL YO 14.4% V191 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: SLAPPED/SPANKED YOU 14.4% V189 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: BURNED YOU 14.6% V195 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: PUNCHED/KICKED YOU 14.6% V193 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: HIT/TRIED TO HIT YO 14.8% V192 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: BIT/SCRATCHED YOU 15.2% V13 TIME INCIDENT OCCURRED -- MILITARY TIME 15.3% V196 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: THREW YOU BODILY 15.3% V197 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: BEAT UNCONSCIOUS 15.5% V198 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: CHOKED/STRANGLED YO 15.5% V6 TOTAL NUMBER OF INCIDENTS, THIS PERP 15.9% V26 PERSON REPORTING 15.9% V47 PERPETRATOR'S AGE 15.9% V25 TIME RECEIVED -- MILITARY TIME 16.1% V199 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: THREATND WITH WEAPO 16.1% V194 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: FORCD SEXUAL ACT 16.3% V8 OTHER VICTIMS/INCIDENTS, THIS PERP 16.5% V200 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: USED WEAPON 16.5% V146 SEX OF THE PERPETRATOR 16.7% V148 RACE OF THE PERPETRATOR 16.9% V176 LENGTH OF THIS RELATIONSHIP IN MONTHS 17.4% V149 VICTIM'S INCOME 17.6% V50 RACE OF PERPETRATOR 17.8% V51 SEX OF PERPETRATOR 18.4% V11 ORDINANCE NUMBER 18.6% V49 RELATIONSHIP OF PERP TO THE VICTIM 19.1% V151 VICTIM'S LEVEL OF EDUCATION 19.3%


V48M MONTH OF PERPETRATOR'S BIRTH 21.4% V37 VICTIM'S RACE 21.6% V48Y YEAR OF PERPETRATOR'S BIRTH 21.6% V185 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: PHYS THREATND CHLDR 22.0% V152 PERPETRATOR'S LEVEL OF EDUCATION 24.4% V201 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: OTHER PHYS BATTERIN 26.1% =======================================================================

ICPSR 9808 Page 15

Table 1 (continued) ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- V53 WERE THERE INJURIES 27.7% V39 VICTIM'S AGE 27.8% V150 PERPETRATOR'S INCOME 30.9%


V109M MONTH OF HEARING DATE 44.7% V109D DAY OF HEARING DATE 44.7% V109Y YEAR OF HEARING DATE 44.9% V216M MONTH OF CONTACT 46.0% V216Y YEAR OF CONTACT 46.2% V216D DAY OF CONTACT 46.4% V217 STATUS OF RELATIONSHIP AT TIME OF INCDN 46.4% V208 VISITD AFTR ASSAULT BY PROJCT VOLUNTEER 46.6% V218 CURRENT STATUS OF RELATIONSHIP 46.6% V220 ABUSED/ASSAULTED AGAIN IN LAST 6 MONTHS 46.6% V29 INJURIES 47.3% V242 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: PHYS THREATENED YOU 47.5% V246 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: PUSHED/GRABBED/SHOV 47.5% V240 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: SCRMD/SWORE/INSULTD 47.7% V244 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: THREW SOMETHING 47.7% V245 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: BURNED YOU 47.7% V247 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: SLAPPED/SPANKED YOU 47.7% V249 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: HIT/TRIED TO HIT YO 47.7% V251 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: PUNCHED/KICKED YOU 47.7% V261 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: THREATND WITH WEAPO 47.9% V248 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: BIT/SCRATCHED YOU 48.1% V252 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: THREW YOU BODILY 48.1% V253 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: BEAT UNCONSCIOUS 48.1% V243 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: THREATND TO KILL YO 48.3% V262 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: USED WEAPON 48.3% V250 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: FORCD SEXUAL ACT 48.5% V254 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: CHOKED/STRANGLED YO 48.7% V160 TIMES POLICE CALLED IN PREVIOUS 6 MONTH 49.4% V111 OUTCOME 50.0% V128 JUDGE 51.5% V63 WERE THERE INJURIES 52.3% V263 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: OTHER PHYS BATTERIN 52.7% V241 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: PHYS THREATND CHLDR 54.5% V27 VERBAL/PHYSICAL RESISTANCE 54.9% V127 CITY ATTORNEY 55.3% V72 HOW MANY PREVIOUS ASSAULTS 58.3% =======================================================================

ICPSR 9808

Table 1 (continued) ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- V270 NUM OTHER SERVICES RECEIVED 58.3% V267 NUM INDVDL COUNSELING SESSIONS ATTENDED 58.5% V268 NUM ALANON/AA MEETINGS ATTENDED 59.1% V264 NUM TIMES USED SHELTER 59.3% V265 NUM TIMES ATTENDED SUPPORT GROUP 59.5% V266 NUM TIMES ATTENDED THERAPY GROUP 59.5% V269 NUM TMS ATTNDD CHEM DEPNDNCE INPATNT TM 59.7% V236 PARTNER IN JAIL IN THE LAST 6 MONTHS 59.8% V278 OTHR RESRCS IN PST 6 MNTHS DUE TO REFRR 60.0% V137M CONTACT WITH VCTM: MONTH MADE 63.3% V137Y CONTACT WITH VCTM: YEAR MADE 63.3% V238 PARTNER OUT OF STATE IN LAST 6 MONTHS 63.3% V137D CONTACT WITH VCTM: DAY MADE 63.6% V110 CHARGES 64.8% V239 NUM DAYS PRTNR OUT OF STATE LAST 6 MNTH 64.8% V281 # TMS PTNR/FMLY GOT INDV CNSLNG PST 6 M 65.3% V289 # TMS PTNR/FMLY ATND INPT TMT PST 6 MOS 65.5% V290 # TMS PTNR/FMLY GOT OTHR SRVCS PST 6 MS 65.5% V288 # TMS PTNR/FMLY ATND ALANON/AA PST 6 MO 65.9% V317 STARTED OTHR LEGAL PROCEEDINGS LST 6 MO 65.9% V280 # TMS PTNR/FMLY ATND THRPY GRP PST 6 MO 66.1% V304 CONTCT WTH LEGL ADVCTE FRM MIP LST 6 MO 66.1% V325 STATUS OF RELATNSHIP AT TIME OF INCIDEN 66.1% V326 CURRENT STATUS OF RELATIONSHIP 66.1% V120 CONDITIONS OF SNTNCE: NO SAME OR SIMILA 66.3% V279 # TMS PTNR/FMLY ATND SUPRT GRP PST 6 MO 66.3% V324M MONTH OF CONTACT 66.3% V324D DAY OF CONTACT 66.3% V324Y YEAR OF CONTACT 66.3% V99 VCTM'S OPINION: PROBATN WITH COUNSELING 67.0% V328 ABUSED/ASSAULTED AGAIN IN LAST 6 MOS 67.0% V64 TYPE OF INJURY -- INJURY #1 67.2% V92 VCTM WANTS NO CONTACT UPON RELEASE 67.8% V67 LOCATION OF INJURY #1 68.0% V348 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: SCRMD/SWORE/INSULTD 68.0% V162 WERE YOU INJURED FROM THIS ASSAULT 68.2% V161 ANY OBJECT OR WEAPON USED AGAINST YOU 68.4% V350 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: PHYS THREATENED YOU 68.4% V351 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: THREATND TO KILL YO 68.6% V358 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: FORCD SEXUAL ACT 68.6% V352 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: THREW SOMETHING 68.9% V372 NUM TIMES USED SHELTER 68.9% =======================================================================

ICPSR 9808 Page 17

Table 1 (continued) ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- V373 NUM TIMES ATTENDED SUPPORT GROUP 68.9% V374 NUM TIMES ATTENDED THERAPY GROUP 68.9% V375 NUM INDVDL COUNSELING SESSIONS ATTENDED 68.9% V376 NUM ALANON/AA MEETINGS ATTENDED 68.9% V377 NUM TMS ATTNDD CHEM DEPNDNCE INPATNT TM 68.9% V378 NUM OTHER SERVICES RECEIVED 68.9% V353 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: BURNED YOU 69.1% V354 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: PUSHED/GRABBED/SHOV 69.3% V355 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: SLAPPED/SPANKED YOU 69.3% V356 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: BIT/SCRATCHED YOU 69.3% V359 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: PUNCHED/KICKED YOU 69.3% V360 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: THREW YOU BODILY 69.3% V362 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: CHOKED/STRANGLED YO 69.3% V369 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: THREATND WITH WEAPO 69.3% V357 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: HIT/TRIED TO HIT YO 69.5% V361 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: BEAT UNCONSCIOUS 69.5% V370 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: USED WEAPON 69.9% V54 LOCATION OF INJURY #1 70.1% V91 VCTM BELIEVES HE WILL RETRN & HARM AGAI 70.3% V94 VCTM WANTS AN ORDER FOR PROTECTION (OFP 70.6% V314 GOTTEN ORDERS FOR PROTECTION LST 6 MOS 70.6% V209 RATE YOUR SATISFACTION WITH THEIR VISIT 71.2% V170 PERPETRATOR THERE WHEN POLICE ARRIVED 71.8% V349 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: PHYS THREATND CHLDR 72.0% V112 SENTENCE 72.2% V316 STARTED DIVORCE PROCEEDINGS LST 6 MOS 72.3% V171 ACTIONS TAKEN BY POLICE: ACTION #1 72.5% V315 LODGED COMPLAINT ON NEW CHRGES LST 6 MO 72.5% V371 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: OTHER PHYS BATTERIN 73.1% V95 VCTM'S OPINION: NO CONTACT 74.1% V386 USE OTHER RESRCS LST 6 MOS DUE TO RFRRL 74.1% V396 # TMS PTNR/FMLY ATND ALANON/AA PST 6 MO 74.1% V397 # TMS PTNR/FMLY ATND INPT TMT PST 6 MOS 74.1% V398 # TMS PTNR/FMLY GOT OTHR SRVCS PST 6 MS 74.1% V387 # TMS PTNR/FMLY ATND SUPRT GRP PST 6 MO 74.4% V388 # TMS PTNR/FMLY ATND THRPY GRP PST 6 MO 74.4% V389 # TMS PTNR/FMLY GOT INDV CNSLNG PST 6 M 74.4% V422 GOTTEN ORDERS FOR PROTECTION LST 6 MOS 74.4% V425 STARTED OTHR LEGAL PROCEEDINGS LST 6 MO 74.4% V424 STARTED DIVORCE PROCEEDINGS LST 6 MOS 74.8% V96 VCTM'S OPINION: JAIL TIME SRVD 75.2% V423 LODGED COMPLAINT ON NEW CHRGES LST 6 MO 75.2% =======================================================================

ICPSR 9808

Table 1 (continued) ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- V101 VCTM'S OPINION: PRBTN -- ALCHL ASSMT/TM 75.8% V97 VCTM'S OPINION: JAIL TIME STAYED 76.1% V344 PARTNER JAILED IN LAST SIX MONTHS 76.7% V346 PARTNER OUT OF STATE LAST 6 MOS 77.3% V169 DID THE POLICE SEE YOUR INJURIES 77.5% V412 CONTCT WTH LEGL ADVCTE FRM MIP LST 6 MO 77.8% V219 RATE SATSFACTN WITH QUALITY OF RELATNSH 78.0% V345 NUM DAYS PRTNR JAILED LAST 6 MOS 78.8% V347 NUM DAYS PARTNER OUT OF STATE LAST 6 MO 79.2% V68 LOCATION OF INJURY #2 80.3% V126 CONDITIONS OF SENTENCE: OTHER CONDITION 80.5% V117 CONDITIONS OF SENTENCE: NO CONTACT 81.1% V113 SENTNCE - JAIL TIME STAYED: TOT DAYS GV 81.6% V163 TYPE OF INJURY -- FIRST INJURY 81.6% V118 CONDITIONS OF SENTENCE: COUNSELING 82.0% V65 TYPE OF INJURY -- INJURY #2 82.6% V28 WEAPON USED 82.8% V100 VCTM'S OPINION: PROBTN -- DRUG ASSMT/TM 82.8% V70 WERE WEAPONS USED 83.3% V119 CONDITIONS OF SENTENCE: TREATMENT 83.3% V124 CONDITIONS OF SNTNCE: CHK WITH PROB OFC 83.9% V307 SATISFIED WITH SRVICES OF LEGL ADVOCATE 84.5% V125 CONDITIONS OF SNTNCE: NO ALC/DRUG OFFNS 85.2% V122 CONDITIONS OF SNTNCE: CHEM DPNDNCY ASSM 85.8% V327 RATE SATISFACTN WITH QUALITY OF RLTNSHI 86.0% V297 HAD PERSONAL CONTACT WITH CITY ATTORNEY 86.2% V73Y YEAR OF PREVIOUS ASSAULT #1 86.4% V129 PROBATION OFFICER 86.6% V115 SNTNCE - JAIL TME STAYD: NUM DAYS STAYE 86.9% V166 LOCATION OF FIRST INJURY 87.1% V98 VCTM'S OPINION: FINE OR RESTITUTION 87.5% V121 CONDITIONS OF SNTNCE: MENTAL HEALTH EVA 87.7% V123 CONDITIONS OF SENTENCE: TAKE MEDICATION 88.3% V221 NUM TIMES POLICE HAVE BEEN CALLED 88.3% V114 SNTNCE - JAIL TME STAYD: NUM DAYS SERVE 88.4% V55 LOCATION OF INJURY #2 88.6% V102 VCTM'S OPINION: PRBTN -- OTHER ASSMT/TM 89.0% V93 VCTM DOES NOT OBJECT TO BAIL ($1400 MAX 89.6% V73M MONTH OF PREVIOUS ASSAULT #1 90.5% V329 NUM TIMES POLICE CALLED 91.1% V139 VICTIM FILED A COMPLAINT 91.3% V302 SATISFIED WITH COURT OUTCOME 91.5% =======================================================================

ICPSR 9808 Page 19

Table 1 (continued) ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- V69 LOCATION OF INJURY #3 91.7% V138 VICTIM USED AN ORDER FOR PROTECTION 92.0% V140 VICTIM USED COURT ADVOCACY 92.0% V141 VICTIM USED OTHER LEGAL ADVOCACY 92.0% V172 ACTIONS TAKEN BY POLICE: ACTION #2 92.0% V303 JUDGE'S SENTENCE REFLECTED OPINIONS 92.4% V305 FEEL LEGAL ADVOCATES UNDERSTOOD NEEDS 93.2% V306 FEEL LGL ADVCTS INFRMD ME OF RGHTS/OPTN 93.2% V66 TYPE OF INJURY -- INJURY #3 93.4% V164 TYPE OF INJURY -- SECOND INJURY 93.6% V77Y YEAR OF PREVIOUS ASSAULT #2 94.3% V223 WERE POLICE INVOLVED 94.5% V301 SATISFIED WITH SERVICES OF CITY ATTORNE 94.5% V142 VICTIM SATISFIED WITH POLICE 94.9% V143 VICTIM DISSATISFIED WITH POLICE 94.9% V222Y YEAR OF THE FIRST INCIDENT 94.9% V298 CITY ATTORNEY LISTENED 94.9% V432M MONTH THE FORM COMPLETED 94.9% V71 TYPE OF WEAPON USED 95.1% V222M MONTH OF THE FIRST INCIDENT 95.1% V225 WAS AN ARREST MADE 95.1% V237 NUM DAYS PARTNER JAILED IN LAST 6 MONTH 95.1% V299 CITY ATTY USED OPINIONS IN NEGOTIATIONS 95.1% V300 CITY ATTY HELPED UNDERSTAND RIGHTS/OPTN 95.1% V432D DAY THE FORM COMPLETED 95.1% V432Y YEAR THE FORM COMPLETED 95.1% V434 OUTCOME OF ORDER FOR PROTECTION 95.1% V433Y YEAR THE FORM OBTAINED 95.3% V437 BEEN VIOLATNS OF THE ORDR FOR PROTECTIO 95.5% V450 ORDR FR PROTECTN REDCED VIOLNCE BY PRTN 95.5% V77M MONTH OF PREVIOUS ASSAULT #2 95.6% V274 SATISFACTION WITH INDVDL COUNSLNG SESSN 95.6% V451 WOULD GET ORDER FOR PROTECTION AGAIN 95.6% V405 HAD PERSONAL CONTACT WITH CITY ATTORNEY 95.8% V433M MONTH THE FORM OBTAINED 95.8% V435 ORDR FOR PROTCTN EXCLDED PRTNR FRM HOUS 95.8% V73D DAY OF PREVIOUS ASSAULT #1 96.2% V167 LOCATION OF SECOND INJURY 96.2% V415 SATISFIED WITH SRVICES OF LEGL ADVOCATE 96.2% V277 SATISFACTION WITH OTHER SERVICES 96.4% V52 PHYSICAL/MENTAL DISABILITIES OF PERP 96.8% V56 LOCATION OF INJURY #3 96.8% =======================================================================

ICPSR 9808

Table 1 (continued) ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- V224 WAS COURT INVOLVED 96.8% V74 LOCATION OF PREVIOUS ASSAULT #1 97.0% V446 POLICE NOTIFIED OF ORDER FOR PROTECTION 97.0% V296 VCTM SATISFACTION WITH OTHER SERVICES 97.2% V330Y YEAR OF THE INCIDENT 97.2% V331 WERE THE POLICE INVOLVED 97.2% V136M NO CONTACT WITH VCTM: MONTH CASE CLOSED 97.3% V136D NO CONTACT WITH VCTM: DAY CASE CLOSED 97.3% V136Y NO CONTACT WITH VCTM: YEAR CASE CLOSED 97.3% V222D DAY OF THE FIRST INCIDENT 97.3% V292 VCTM SATISFACTION WITH THERAPY GROUP 97.3% V438 PHYSICAL VIOLENCE 97.3% V439 THREATS OF VIOLENCE 97.3% V444 ENTERING YOUR HOME WITHOUT BEING ASKED 97.3% V116 SENTNCE - JAIL TME ORDERED: TOT NUM DAY 97.5% V330M MONTH OF THE INCIDENT 97.5% V440 HARASSMENT BY PHONE 97.5% V75 VICTIM GO TO HOSPITAL -- ASSAULT #1 97.7% V332 WAS THE COURT INVOLVED 97.7% V333 WAS AN ARREST MADE 97.7% V413 FEEL LEGAL ADVOCATES UNDERSTOOD NEEDS 97.7% V76 COURT OUTCOME OF PREVIOUS ASSAULT #1 97.9% V87Y YEAR OF PREVIOUS ASSAULT #3 97.9% V414 FEEL LGL ADVCTS INFRMD ME OF RGHTS/OPTN 97.9% V77D DAY OF PREVIOUS ASSAULT #2 98.1% V173 ACTIONS TAKEN BY POLICE: ACTION #3 98.1% V275 SATISFACTION WITH ALANON/AA 98.1% V441 FOLLOWED BY PARTNER 98.1% V442 HARASSMNT BY PARTNER'S FRIENDS/RELATIVE 98.1% V87M MONTH OF PREVIOUS ASSAULT #3 98.3% V165 TYPE OF INJURY -- THIRD INJURY 98.3% V168 LOCATION OF THIRD INJURY 98.3% V226Y YEAR OF THE SECOND INCIDENT 98.3% V272 SATISFACTION WITH THE SUPPORT GROUPS 98.3% V294 VCTM SATISFACTION WITH ALANON/AA 98.3% V295 VCTM SATISFACTION WITH CHEM DEPNDNCY TM 98.3% V78 LOCATION OF PREVIOUS ASSAULT #2 98.5% V226M MONTH OF THE SECOND INCIDENT 98.5% V227 WERE POLICE INVOLVED 98.5% V273 SATISFACTION WITH THE THERAPY GROUP 98.5% V293 VCTM SATISFACTION WITH INDIVIDUAL CNSLN 98.5% V443 VIOLATN OF VISITATN OR CUSTODY AGREEMEN 98.5% =======================================================================

ICPSR 9808 Page 21

Table 1 (continued) ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- V445 OTHER 98.5% V291 VCTM SATISFACTION WITH SUPPORT GROUP 98.7% V447 POLICE ENFORCED THE ORDER FOR PROTECTIO 98.7% V449 DID THE POLICE FILL OUT A REPORT 98.7% V79 VICTIM GO TO HOSPITAL -- ASSAULT #2 98.9% V229 WAS AN ARREST MADE? 98.9% V271 SATISFACTION WITH THE SHELTER 98.9% V335 WERE THE POLICE INVOLVED 98.9% V404 VCTM SATISFACTION WITH OTHER SERVICES 98.9% V448 NUM MINUTES POLICE TOOK TO ARRIVE 98.9% V87D DAY OF PREVIOUS ASSAULT #3 99.1% V226D DAY OF THE SECOND INCIDENT 99.1% V228 WAS COURT INVOLVED 99.1% V330D DAY OF THE INCIDENT 99.1% V334M MONTH OF THE INCIDENT 99.1% V334Y YEAR OF THE INCIDENT 99.1% V385 SATISFACTION WITH OTHER SERVICES 99.1% V406 CITY ATTORNEY LISTENED 99.1% V407 CITY ATTY USED OPINIONS IN NEGOTIATIONS 99.1% V408 CITY ATTY HELPED UNDERSTAND RIGHTS/OPTN 99.1% V409 SATISFIED WITH SERVICES OF CITY ATTORNE 99.1% V80 COURT OUTCOME OF PREVIOUS ASSAULT #2 99.2% V90 COURT OUTCOME OF PREVIOUS ASSAULT #3 99.2% V337 WAS AN ARREST MADE 99.2% V380 SATISFACTION WITH SUPPORT GROUPS 99.2% V382 SATISFACTION WITH INDVDL COUNSLNG SESSN 99.2% V383 SATISFACTION WITH ALANON/AA 99.2% V400 VCTM SATISFACTION WITH THERAPY GROUP 99.2% V410 SATISFIED WITH COURT OUTCOME 99.2% V433D DAY THE FORM OBTAINED 99.2% V334D DAY OF THE INCIDENT 99.4% V336 WAS THE COURT INVOLVED 99.4% V402 VCTM SATISFACTION WITH ALANON/AA 99.4% V411 JUDGE'S SENTENCE REFLECTED OPINIONS 99.4% V436 KNOW WHERE TO GET ORDR AMENDD TO EXCLUD 99.4% V399 VCTM SATISFACTION WITH SUPPORT GROUP 99.6% V88 LOCATION OF PREVIOUS ASSAULT #3 99.8% V381 SATISFACTION WITH THERAPY GROUP 99.8% V401 VCTM SATISFACTION WITH INDIVIDUAL CNSLN 99.8% V48D DAY OF PERPETRATOR'S BIRTH 100.0% V89 VICTIM GO TO THE HOSPITAL -- ASSAULT #3 100.0% V276 SATSFACTN WITH CHEM DEPNDNCY INPATNT TMT 100.0% =======================================================================

ICPSR 9808

Table 1 (continued) ======================================================================= Percent of Cases with Variable Name and Label Missing Values ----------------------------------------------------------------------- V379 SATISFACTION WITH SHELTER 100.0% V384 SATISFACTION WITH CHEM DPNDNCY INPT TMT 100.0% V403 VCTM SATISFACTION WITH CHEM DEPNDNCY TMT 100.0% ======================================================================= *Variables individually listed only if greater than 5% missing values. Data does not contain skip patterns or skip patterns are not reflected in the data as coded.

CODEBOOK FOR ICPSR 9808

MINNEAPOLIS INTERVENTION PROJECT, 1986-1987

PLEASE NOTE: The "M" between the code and the code label indicates the code has been designated as a missing value.

----------------------------------------------------------------------- BEG END NAME VARIABLE LABEL COL COL FMT -----------------------------------------------------------------------

V1 CASE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 1 8 F8

Original Case Identification Number was changed to a randomly-assigned sequential number. The original data contained two duplicate Case Identification Numbers which were recoded to preserve the duplication.

V2 PERP'S VICTIMS INFORMATION PERTAINS TO 9 9 F1

1 1st victim

V3 VICTIM IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 10 12 F3

V4 PERPETRATOR IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 13 15 F3

V5 TOTAL NUMBER OF VICTIMS, THIS INCIDENT 16 16 F1

V6 TOTAL NUMBER OF INCIDENTS, THIS PERP 17 17 F1

V7 PERPETRATOR ARRESTED THIS INCIDENT 18 18 F1

0 no 1 yes

V8 OTHER VICTIMS/INCIDENTS, THIS PERP 19 19 F1

1 none 2 other inc/same vict 3 other inc/other vict 4 this inc/other vict

V9 TOTAL NO. OF ALL VICT'S, THIS INCIDENT 20 20 F1

V10 TOTAL NO. OF ALL PERP'S, THIS INCIDENT 21 21 F1

V11 ORDINANCE NUMBER 22 27 F6

V12M MONTH INCIDENT OCCURRED 28 29 F2

V12D DAY INCIDENT OCCURRED 30 31 F2

V12Y YEAR INCIDENT OCCURRED 32 33 F2

ICPSR 9808


V13 TIME INCIDENT OCCURRED -- MILITARY TIME 34 37 F4

V15 PRECINCT OF OCCURRENCE 38 38 F1

V24M MONTH RECEIVED 39 40 F2

V24D DAY RECEIVED 41 42 F2

V24Y YEAR RECEIVED 43 44 F2

V25 TIME RECEIVED -- MILITARY TIME 45 48 F4

V26 PERSON REPORTING 49 49 F1

1 victim 2 perpetrator 3 family member 4 friend 5 neighbor 6 other 8 M don't know

V27 VERBAL/PHYSICAL RESISTANCE 50 50 F1

0 no 1 yes

V28 WEAPON USED 51 52 F2

0 none 1 revolver 2 automatic 3 other handgun 4 rifle 5 shotgun 6 sawed shotgun 7 disabling chemical 8 knife 9 sharp instr 10 blunt instr 11 explosive

V29 INJURIES 53 53 F1

1 minor untreated 2 treated at scene 3 hospital 4 fatal 5 self inflicted 6 other

ICPSR 9808 Page 25


V37 VICTIM'S RACE 54 54 F1

1 white 2 black 3 native american 4 chinese 5 japanese 6 asian 7 alaskan eskimo 8 M unknown

V38 VICTIM'S SEX 55 55 F1

1 female 2 male

V39 VICTIM'S AGE 56 57 F2

V47 PERPETRATOR'S AGE 58 59 F2

V48M MONTH OF PERPETRATOR'S BIRTH 60 61 F2

V48D DAY OF PERPETRATOR'S BIRTH 62 63 F2

99 M blanked/confidential

V48Y YEAR OF PERPETRATOR'S BIRTH 64 65 F2

V49 RELATIONSHIP OF PERP TO THE VICTIM 66 67 F2

1 husband 2 wife 3 immediate family 4 blood relative 5 male friend 6 female friend 7 legal custodian 8 acquaintance 9 roommate 10 homosexual 11 stranger 12 ex-husband

V50 RACE OF PERPETRATOR 68 68 F1

1 white

ICPSR 9808


V50 (cont.)

2 black 3 native American 4 chinese 5 japanese 6 asian 7 alaskan eskimo 8 M unknown

V51 SEX OF PERPETRATOR 69 69 F1

1 male 2 female

V52 PHYSICAL/MENTAL DISABILITIES OF PERP 70 70 F1

1 retarded 2 epileptic 3 physical handicap 4 senile 5 disturbed 9 M na/missing

V53 WERE THERE INJURIES 71 71 F1

0 no 1 yes

V54 LOCATION OF INJURY #1 72 73 F2

1 head 2 ear 3 face 4 mouth 5 teeth 6 neck 7 upper torso 8 arms 9 wrists/hands 10 lower torso 11 legs 12 feet/ankles 77 other 88 M not applicable


1 head

ICPSR 9808 Page 27


V55 (cont.)

2 ear 3 face 4 mouth 5 teeth 6 neck 7 upper torso 8 arms 9 wrists/hands 10 lower torso 11 legs 12 feet/ankles 77 other 88 M not applicable


1 head 2 ear 3 face 4 mouth 5 teeth 6 neck 7 upper torso 8 arms 9 wrists/hands 10 lower torso 11 legs 12 feet or ankles 77 other 88 M not applicable

V63 WERE THERE INJURIES 78 78 F1

0 no 1 yes

V64 TYPE OF INJURY -- INJURY #1 79 80 F2

1 bruises 2 abrasions 3 scratches 4 sprains 5 minor cuts 6 dislocated joints

ICPSR 9808


V64 (cont.)

7 broken bones 8 crack/chip teeth 9 burns 10 deep cuts/wounds 11 gunshot wound 12 broken ear drum 13 redness 14 pulled hair 15 bloody nose 16 bleeding 17 bite marks 18 swelling 19 stiff joint 20 other 88 other 99 M na/missing


1 bruises 2 abrasions 3 scratches 4 sprains 5 minor cuts 6 dislocated joints 7 broken bones 8 crack/chip teeth 9 burns 10 deep cuts/wounds 11 gunshot wound 12 broken ear drum 13 redness 14 pulled hair 15 bloody nose 16 bleeding 17 bite marks 18 swelling 19 stiff joint 20 other 88 other 99 M na/missing


1 bruises

ICPSR 9808 Page 29


V66 (cont.)

2 abrasions 3 scratches 4 sprains 5 minor cuts 6 dislocated joints 7 broken bones 8 crack/chip teeth 9 burns 10 deep cuts/wounds 11 gunshot wound 12 broken ear drum 13 redness 14 pulled hair 15 bloody nose 16 bleeding 17 bite marks 18 swelling 19 stiff joint 20 other 88 other 99 M na/missing




1 head 2 ear 3 face

ICPSR 9808


V68 (cont.)

4 mouth 5 teeth 6 neck 7 upper torso 8 arms 9 wrists/hands 10 lower torso 11 legs 12 feet/ankles 77 other 88 M not applicable



V70 WERE WEAPONS USED 91 91 F1

0 no 1 yes

V71 TYPE OF WEAPON USED 92 93 F2

1 revolver 2 automatic 3 other handgun 4 rifle 5 shotgun 6 sawed shotgun 7 disabling chemical 8 knife

ICPSR 9808 Page 31


V71 (cont.)

9 sharp instr 10 blunt instr 11 explosive 77 other 88 M na/no weapon used

V72 HOW MANY PREVIOUS ASSAULTS 94 95 F2

V73M MONTH OF PREVIOUS ASSAULT #1 96 97 F2

99 M na/missing

V73D DAY OF PREVIOUS ASSAULT #1 98 99 F2

99 M na/missing

V73Y YEAR OF PREVIOUS ASSAULT #1 100 101 F2

99 M na/missing

V74 LOCATION OF PREVIOUS ASSAULT #1 102 102 F1

1 Minneapolis 2 St. Paul 3 Suburb of the Twin Cities 4 Out state Minnesota 5 Out of state 6 Out of USA 9 M na/missing

V75 VICTIM GO TO HOSPITAL -- ASSAULT #1 103 103 F1

0 no 1 yes 9 M na/missing

V76 COURT OUTCOME OF PREVIOUS ASSAULT #1 104 104 F1

1 cont for attny 2 formal complaint 3 guilty 4 not guilty 5 dismissed 6 CDS Program

ICPSR 9808


V76 (cont.)

7 no plea 9 M na/missing


99 M na/missing


99 M na/missing


99 M na/missing


1 Minneapolis 2 St. Paul 3 Suburban Twin Cities 4 Out state Minnesota 5 Out of state 6 Out of USA 9 M na/missing

V79 VICTIM GO TO HOSPITAL -- ASSAULT #2 112 112 F1



1 cont for attny 2 formal complaint 3 guilty 4 not guilty 5 dismissed 6 CDS program 7 no plea 9 M na/missing


99 M na/missing

ICPSR 9808 Page 33



99 M na/missing


99 M na/missing


1 Minneapolis 2 St. Paul 3 Suburban Twin Cities 4 Out state Minnesota 5 Out of state 6 Out of USA 9 M na/missing

V89 VICTIM GO TO THE HOSPITAL -- ASSAULT #3 121 121 F1



1 cont for attny 2 formal complaint 3 guilty 4 not guilty 5 dismissed 6 CDS program 7 no plea 9 M na/missing

V91 VCTM BELIEVES HE WILL RETRN & HARM AGAIN 123 123 F1

0 no 1 yes

V92 VCTM WANTS NO CONTACT UPON RELEASE 124 124 F1

0 no 1 yes

ICPSR 9808


V93 VCTM DOES NOT OBJECT TO BAIL ($1400 MAX) 125 125 F1

0 no 1 yes

V94 VCTM WANTS AN ORDER FOR PROTECTION (OFP) 126 126 F1

0 no 1 yes

V95 VCTM'S OPINION: NO CONTACT 127 127 F1

1 yes 2 no

V96 VCTM'S OPINION: JAIL TIME SRVD 128 128 F1

1 she does not object 2 no served jail time

V97 VCTM'S OPINION: JAIL TIME STAYED 129 129 F1

1 she does not object 2 no stayed jail time

V98 VCTM'S OPINION: FINE OR RESTITUTION 130 130 F1

1 yes 2 no fine/restitution

V99 VCTM'S OPINION: PROBATN WITH COUNSELING 131 131 F1

0 no 1 yes

V100 VCTM'S OPINION: PROBTN -- DRUG ASSMT/TMT 132 132 F1

0 no 1 yes

V101 VCTM'S OPINION: PRBTN -- ALCHL ASSMT/TMT 133 133 F1

0 no 1 yes

ICPSR 9808 Page 35


V102 VCTM'S OPINION: PRBTN -- OTHER ASSMT/TMT 134 134 F1

0 no 1 yes

V109M MONTH OF HEARING DATE 135 136 F2

V109D DAY OF HEARING DATE 137 138 F2

V109Y YEAR OF HEARING DATE 139 140 F2

V110 CHARGES 141 141 F1

1 domestic assault 2 disorderly conduct 3 violation of OFP 4 damage to property 5 trespassing 6 harassing phone calls 7 Other

V111 OUTCOME 142 142 F1

1 cont for attny 2 formal complaint 3 guilty 4 not guilty 5 dismissed 6 CDS program 7 no plea

V112 SENTENCE 143 143 F1

1 continue for dismissal 2 stay of imposition 3 jail time stayed 4 jail time ordered 5 fine

V113 SENTNCE - JAIL TIME STAYED: TOT DAYS GVN 144 146 F3

V114 SNTNCE - JAIL TME STAYD: NUM DAYS SERVED 147 148 F2

V115 SNTNCE - JAIL TME STAYD: NUM DAYS STAYED 149 151 F3

ICPSR 9808


V116 SENTNCE - JAIL TME ORDERED: TOT NUM DAYS 152 153 F2

V117 CONDITIONS OF SENTENCE: NO CONTACT 154 154 F1

0 no 1 yes

V118 CONDITIONS OF SENTENCE: COUNSELING 155 155 F1

0 no 1 yes

V119 CONDITIONS OF SENTENCE: TREATMENT 156 156 F1

0 no 1 yes

V120 CONDITIONS OF SNTNCE: NO SAME OR SIMILAR 157 157 F1

0 no 1 yes

V121 CONDITIONS OF SNTNCE: MENTAL HEALTH EVAL 158 158 F1

0 no 1 yes

V122 CONDITIONS OF SNTNCE: CHEM DPNDNCY ASSMT 159 159 F1

0 no 1 yes

V123 CONDITIONS OF SENTENCE: TAKE MEDICATIONS 160 160 F1

0 no 1 yes

V124 CONDITIONS OF SNTNCE: CHK WITH PROB OFCR 161 161 F1

0 no 1 yes

V125 CONDITIONS OF SNTNCE: NO ALC/DRUG OFFNS 162 162 F1

0 no

ICPSR 9808 Page 37


V125 (cont.)

1 yes

V126 CONDITIONS OF SENTENCE: OTHER CONDITIONS 163 163 F1

0 no 1 yes

V127 CITY ATTORNEY 164 165 F2

V128 JUDGE 166 167 F2

V129 PROBATION OFFICER 168 169 F2

V136M NO CONTACT WITH VCTM: MONTH CASE CLOSED 170 171 F2

99 M na/missing

V136D NO CONTACT WITH VCTM: DAY CASE CLOSED 172 173 F2

99 M na/missing

V136Y NO CONTACT WITH VCTM: YEAR CASE CLOSED 174 175 F2

99 M na/missing

V137M CONTACT WITH VCTM: MONTH MADE 176 177 F2

99 M na/missing

V137D CONTACT WITH VCTM: DAY MADE 178 179 F2

99 M na/missing

V137Y CONTACT WITH VCTM: YEAR MADE 180 181 F2


V138 VICTIM USED AN ORDER FOR PROTECTION 182 182 F1

0 no 1 yes

V139 VICTIM FILED A COMPLAINT 183 183 F1

0 no

ICPSR 9808


V139 (cont.)

1 yes

V140 VICTIM USED COURT ADVOCACY 184 184 F1

0 no 1 yes

V141 VICTIM USED OTHER LEGAL ADVOCACY 185 185 F1

0 no 1 yes

V142 VICTIM SATISFIED WITH POLICE 186 186 F1

0 no 1 yes

V143 VICTIM DISSATISFIED WITH POLICE 187 187 F1

0 no 1 yes

V144M MONTH OF THE FIRST CONTACT 188 189 F2

V144D DAY OF THE FIRST CONTACT 190 191 F2

V144Y YEAR OF FIRST CONTACT 192 193 F2

V145 SEX OF THE VICTIM 194 194 F1

1 female 2 male

V146 SEX OF THE PERPETRATOR 195 195 F1

1 female 2 male

V147 RACE OF THE VICTIM 196 196 F1

1 asian/pacific islander 2 black 3 hispanic/latino 4 native american

ICPSR 9808 Page 39


V147 (cont.)

5 white 6 other

V148 RACE OF THE PERPETRATOR 197 197 F1

1 asian/pacific islander 2 black 3 hispanic/latino 4 native american 5 white 6 other

V149 VICTIM'S INCOME 198 198 F1

1 unemployed 2 under $9,999 3 $10,000 - 19,999 4 $20,000 - 29,999 5 $30,000 - 39,999 6 $40,000 and up

V150 PERPETRATOR'S INCOME 199 199 F1

1 unemployed 2 under $9,999 3 $10,000 - 19,999 4 $20,000 - 29,999 5 $30,000 - 39,999 6 $40,000 and up

V151 VICTIM'S LEVEL OF EDUCATION 200 200 F1

1 under 12 years 2 high school diploma 3 voc-tech school 4 some college 5 college grad 6 post-grad

V152 PERPETRATOR'S LEVEL OF EDUCATION 201 201 F1

1 under 12 years 2 high school diploma 3 voc-tech school

ICPSR 9808


V152 (cont.)

4 some college 5 college grad 6 post-grad

V159 1ST TIME POLICE CAME RE: VIOLENT INCDNT 202 202 F1

0 no 1 yes

V160 TIMES POLICE CALLED IN PREVIOUS 6 MONTHS 203 204 F2

V161 ANY OBJECT OR WEAPON USED AGAINST YOU 205 205 F1

0 no 1 yes

V162 WERE YOU INJURED FROM THIS ASSAULT 206 206 F1

0 no 1 yes

V163 TYPE OF INJURY -- FIRST INJURY 207 208 F2

1 bruises 2 abrasions 3 scratches 4 sprains 5 minor cuts 6 dislocated joints 7 broken bones 8 crack/chip teeth 9 burns 10 deep cuts/wounds 11 gunshot wound 12 broken ear drum 13 redness 14 pulled hair 15 bloody nose 16 bleeding 17 swelling 18 bite marks 77 other 88 M na/no other injury

V164 TYPE OF INJURY -- SECOND INJURY 209 210 F2

1 bruises

ICPSR 9808 Page 41


V164 (cont.)

2 abrasions 3 scratches 4 sprains 5 minor cuts 6 dislocated joints 7 broken bones 8 crack/chip teeth 9 burns 10 deep cuts/wounds 11 gunshot wound 12 broken ear drum 13 redness 14 pulled hair 15 bloody nose 16 bleeding 17 swelling 18 bite marks 77 other 88 M na/no other injury

V165 TYPE OF INJURY -- THIRD INJURY 211 212 F2

1 bruises 2 abrasions 3 scratches 4 sprains 5 minor cuts 6 dislocated joints 7 broken bones 8 crack/chip teeth 9 burns 10 deep cuts/wounds 11 gunshot wound 12 broken ear drum 13 redness 14 pulled hair 15 bloody nose 16 bleeding 17 swelling 18 bite marks 77 other 88 M na/missing

V166 LOCATION OF FIRST INJURY 213 214 F2

1 head

ICPSR 9808


V166 (cont.)

2 ear 3 face 4 mouth 5 neck 6 upper torso 7 arms 8 wrists/hands 9 lower torso 10 legs 11 ankles/feet 77 other 88 M na/no other injury

V167 LOCATION OF SECOND INJURY 215 216 F2

1 head 2 ear 3 face 4 mouth 5 neck 6 upper torso 7 arms 8 wrists/hands 9 lower torso 10 legs 11 ankles/feet 77 other 88 M na/no other injuries

V168 LOCATION OF THIRD INJURY 217 218 F2

1 head 2 ear 3 face 4 mouth 5 neck 6 upper torso 7 arms 8 wrists/hands 9 lower torso 10 legs 11 ankles/feet 77 other 88 M na/no other injury

ICPSR 9808 Page 43


V169 DID THE POLICE SEE YOUR INJURIES 219 219 F1

0 no 1 yes

V170 PERPETRATOR THERE WHEN POLICE ARRIVED 220 220 F1

0 no 1 yes

V171 ACTIONS TAKEN BY POLICE: ACTION #1 221 222 F2

1 arrest perp 2 talked to perp 3 talked to vict 4 told perp to leave 5 did nothing 6 tried to mediate 7 took perp did not arrest 8 took a report 9 gave vict. choice 10 call crisis center 11 took vict to hosp/shelter 12 encourage vict to get OFP 13 other 88 M not applicable


1 arrest perp 2 talked to perp 3 talked to vict 4 told perp to leave 5 did nothing 6 tried to mediate 7 took perp did not arrest 8 took a report 9 gave vict. choice 10 call crisis center 11 took vict to hosp/shelter 12 encourage vict to get OFP 13 other 88 M not applicable


1 arrest perp

ICPSR 9808


V173 (cont.)

2 talked to perp 3 talked to vict 4 told perp to leave 5 did nothing 6 tried to mediate 7 took perp did not arrest 8 took a report 9 gave vict. choice 10 call crisis center 11 took vict to hosp/shelter 12 encourage vict to get OFP 13 other 88 M not applicable

V174 HOW SATISFD WERE YOU WITH POLICE RESPNSE 227 227 F1

1 very satisfied 2 satisfied 3 dissatisfied 4 very dissatisfied

V175 STATUS OF RELATIONSHIP AT TIME OF INCDNT 228 228 F1

1 married/live together 2 married/not live together 3 not married/live together 4 not married/not live together 5 divorced/live together 6 divorced/not live together 7 other

V176 LENGTH OF THIS RELATIONSHIP IN MONTHS 229 231 F3

V177 CURRENT STATUS OF THIS RELATIONSHIP 232 232 F1

1 married/live together 2 married/not live together 3 not married/live together 4 not married/ not live together 5 divorced/live together 6 divorced/not live together 7 other

V184 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: SCRMD/SWORE/INSULTD 233 234 F2

98 can't be counted

ICPSR 9808 Page 45


V185 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: PHYS THREATND CHLDRN 235 236 F2

98 can't be counted

V186 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: PHYS THREATENED YOU 237 238 F2

98 can't be counted

V187 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: THREATND TO KILL YOU 239 240 F2

98 can't be counted

V188 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: THREW SOMETHING 241 242 F2

98 can't be counted

V189 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: BURNED YOU 243 244 F2

98 can't be counted

V190 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: PUSHED/GRABBED/SHOVD 245 246 F2

98 can't be counted

V191 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: SLAPPED/SPANKED YOU 247 248 F2

98 can't be counted

V192 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: BIT/SCRATCHED YOU 249 250 F2

98 can't be counted

V193 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: HIT/TRIED TO HIT YOU 251 252 F2

98 can't be counted

V194 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: FORCD SEXUAL ACT 253 254 F2

98 can't be counted

V195 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: PUNCHED/KICKED YOU 255 256 F2

98 can't be counted

V196 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: THREW YOU BODILY 257 258 F2

98 can't be counted

ICPSR 9808


V197 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: BEAT UNCONSCIOUS 259 260 F2

98 can't be counted

V198 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: CHOKED/STRANGLED YOU 261 262 F2

98 can't be counted

V199 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: THREATND WITH WEAPON 263 264 F2

98 can't be counted

V200 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: USED WEAPON 265 265 F1

98 can't be counted

V201 LAST 6 MOS, #TIMES: OTHER PHYS BATTERING 266 267 F2

98 can't be counted

V208 VISITD AFTR ASSAULT BY PROJCT VOLUNTEERS 268 268 F1

0 no 1 yes

V209 RATE YOUR SATISFACTION WITH THEIR VISIT 269 269 F1

1 very satisfied 2 satisfied 3 dissatisfied 4 very dissatisfied 8 M not applicable

V216M MONTH OF CONTACT 270 271 F2

V216D DAY OF CONTACT 272 273 F2

V216Y YEAR OF CONTACT 274 275 F2

V217 STATUS OF RELATIONSHIP AT TIME OF INCDNT 276 276 F1

1 married/live together 2 married/not live together 3 not married/live together

ICPSR 9808 Page 47


V217 (cont.)

4 not married/not live together 5 divorced/live together 6 divorced/not live together 7 other

V218 CURRENT STATUS OF RELATIONSHIP 277 277 F1


V219 RATE SATSFACTN WITH QUALITY OF RELATNSHP 278 278 F1


V220 ABUSED/ASSAULTED AGAIN IN LAST 6 MONTHS 279 279 F1

0 no 1 yes

V221 NUM TIMES POLICE HAVE BEEN CALLED 280 280 F1

9 M missing

V222M MONTH OF THE FIRST INCIDENT 281 282 F2

V222D DAY OF THE FIRST INCIDENT 283 284 F2

V222Y YEAR OF THE FIRST INCIDENT 285 286 F2

V223 WERE POLICE INVOLVED 287 287 F1

0 no 1 yes

V224 WAS COURT INVOLVED 288 288 F1

0 no

ICPSR 9808


V224 (cont.)

1 yes

V225 WAS AN ARREST MADE 289 289 F1

0 no 1 yes

V226M MONTH OF THE SECOND INCIDENT 290 291 F2

99 M na/missing

V226D DAY OF THE SECOND INCIDENT 292 293 F2

99 M na/missing

V226Y YEAR OF THE SECOND INCIDENT 294 295 F2

99 M na/missing

V227 WERE POLICE INVOLVED 296 296 F1


V228 WAS COURT INVOLVED 297 297 F1


V229 WAS AN ARREST MADE? 298 298 F1


V236 PARTNER IN JAIL IN THE LAST 6 MONTHS 299 299 F1

0 no 1 yes

V237 NUM DAYS PARTNER JAILED IN LAST 6 MONTHS 300 301 F2

V238 PARTNER OUT OF STATE IN LAST 6 MONTHS 302 302 F1

0 no

ICPSR 9808 Page 49


V238 (cont.)

1 yes

V239 NUM DAYS PRTNR OUT OF STATE LAST 6 MNTHS 303 305 F3


98 can't be counted


98 can't be counted


98 can't be counted


98 can't be counted


98 M can't be counted


98 can't be counted










98 can't be counted

ICPSR 9808







98 can't be counted


98 can't be counted




98 can't be counted

V264 NUM TIMES USED SHELTER 337 338 F2

V265 NUM TIMES ATTENDED SUPPORT GROUP 339 340 F2

V266 NUM TIMES ATTENDED THERAPY GROUP 341 342 F2

V267 NUM INDVDL COUNSELING SESSIONS ATTENDED 343 344 F2

V268 NUM ALANON/AA MEETINGS ATTENDED 345 346 F2

V269 NUM TMS ATTNDD CHEM DEPNDNCE INPATNT TMT 347 348 F2

V270 NUM OTHER SERVICES RECEIVED 349 350 F2

V271 SATISFACTION WITH THE SHELTER 351 351 F1


ICPSR 9808 Page 51


V271 (cont.)

8 M not applicable

V272 SATISFACTION WITH THE SUPPORT GROUPS 352 352 F1


V273 SATISFACTION WITH THE THERAPY GROUP 353 353 F1


V274 SATISFACTION WITH INDVDL COUNSLNG SESSNS 354 354 F1


V275 SATISFACTION WITH ALANON/AA 355 355 F1


V276 SATSFACTN WITH CHEM DEPNDNCY INPATNT TMT 356 356 F1


V277 SATISFACTION WITH OTHER SERVICES 357 357 F1

1 very satisfied

ICPSR 9808


V277 (cont.)

2 satisfied 3 dissatisfied 4 very dissatisfied 8 M not applicable

V278 OTHR RESRCS IN PST 6 MNTHS DUE TO REFRRL 358 358 F1

0 no 1 yes 8 M not applicable

V279 # TMS PTNR/FMLY ATND SUPRT GRP PST 6 MOS 359 359 F1

V280 # TMS PTNR/FMLY ATND THRPY GRP PST 6 MOS 360 361 F2

V281 # TMS PTNR/FMLY GOT INDV CNSLNG PST 6 MS 362 363 F2

V288 # TMS PTNR/FMLY ATND ALANON/AA PST 6 MOS 364 365 F2

V289 # TMS PTNR/FMLY ATND INPT TMT PST 6 MOS 366 367 F2

V290 # TMS PTNR/FMLY GOT OTHR SRVCS PST 6 MS 368 369 F2

V291 VCTM SATISFACTION WITH SUPPORT GROUP 370 370 F1


V292 VCTM SATISFACTION WITH THERAPY GROUP 371 371 F1


V293 VCTM SATISFACTION WITH INDIVIDUAL CNSLNG 372 372 F1

1 very satisfied 2 satisfied 3 dissatisfied

ICPSR 9808 Page 53


V293 (cont.)

4 very dissatisfied 8 M not applicable

V294 VCTM SATISFACTION WITH ALANON/AA 373 373 F1


V295 VCTM SATISFACTION WITH CHEM DEPNDNCY TMT 374 374 F1


V296 VCTM SATISFACTION WITH OTHER SERVICES 375 375 F1


V297 HAD PERSONAL CONTACT WITH CITY ATTORNEY 376 376 F1


V298 CITY ATTORNEY LISTENED 377 377 F1

1 strongly agree 2 agree 3 disagree 4 strongly disagree 8 M not applicable

V299 CITY ATTY USED OPINIONS IN NEGOTIATIONS 378 378 F1

1 strongly agree

ICPSR 9808


V299 (cont.)

2 agree 3 disagree 4 strongly disagree 8 M not applicable

V300 CITY ATTY HELPED UNDERSTAND RIGHTS/OPTNS 379 379 F1


V301 SATISFIED WITH SERVICES OF CITY ATTORNEY 380 380 F1

1 very satisfied 2 satisfied 3 dissatisfied 4 strongly dissatisfied 8 M not applicable

V302 SATISFIED WITH COURT OUTCOME 381 381 F1


V303 JUDGE'S SENTENCE REFLECTED OPINIONS 382 382 F1


V304 CONTCT WTH LEGL ADVCTE FRM MIP LST 6 MOS 383 383 F1

0 no 1 yes

V305 FEEL LEGAL ADVOCATES UNDERSTOOD NEEDS 384 384 F1

1 strongly agree

ICPSR 9808 Page 55


V305 (cont.)

2 agree 3 disagree 4 strongly disagree 8 M not applicable

V306 FEEL LGL ADVCTS INFRMD ME OF RGHTS/OPTNS 385 385 F1


V307 SATISFIED WITH SRVICES OF LEGL ADVOCATES 386 386 F1


V314 GOTTEN ORDERS FOR PROTECTION LST 6 MOS 387 387 F1

0 no 1 yes

V315 LODGED COMPLAINT ON NEW CHRGES LST 6 MOS 388 388 F1

0 no 1 yes

V316 STARTED DIVORCE PROCEEDINGS LST 6 MOS 389 389 F1

0 no 1 yes

V317 STARTED OTHR LEGAL PROCEEDINGS LST 6 MOS 390 390 F1

0 no 1 yes

V324M MONTH OF CONTACT 391 392 F2

V324D DAY OF CONTACT 393 394 F2

ICPSR 9808


V324Y YEAR OF CONTACT 395 396 F2

V325 STATUS OF RELATNSHIP AT TIME OF INCIDENT 397 397 F1

1 married/live together 2 married/live together 3 not married/live together 4 not married/not live together 5 divorced/live together 6 divorced/not live together 7 other

V326 CURRENT STATUS OF RELATIONSHIP 398 398 F1


V327 RATE SATISFACTN WITH QUALITY OF RLTNSHIP 399 399 F1


V328 ABUSED/ASSAULTED AGAIN IN LAST 6 MOS 400 400 F1

0 no 1 yes

V329 NUM TIMES POLICE CALLED 401 401 F1

V330M MONTH OF THE INCIDENT 402 403 F2

V330D DAY OF THE INCIDENT 404 405 F2

V330Y YEAR OF THE INCIDENT 406 407 F2

V331 WERE THE POLICE INVOLVED 408 408 F1

0 no

ICPSR 9808 Page 57


V331 (cont.)

1 yes

V332 WAS THE COURT INVOLVED 409 409 F1

0 no 1 yes


0 no 1 yes

V334M MONTH OF THE INCIDENT 411 412 F2

V334D DAY OF THE INCIDENT 413 414 F2

V334Y YEAR OF THE INCIDENT 415 416 F2

V335 WERE THE POLICE INVOLVED 417 417 F1

0 no 1 yes

V336 WAS THE COURT INVOLVED 418 418 F1

0 no 1 yes


0 no 1 yes

V344 PARTNER JAILED IN LAST SIX MONTHS 420 420 F1

0 no 1 yes

V345 NUM DAYS PRTNR JAILED LAST 6 MOS 421 423 F3

V346 PARTNER OUT OF STATE LAST 6 MOS 424 424 F1

0 no 1 yes

ICPSR 9808


V347 NUM DAYS PARTNER OUT OF STATE LAST 6 MOS 425 427 F3



















V372 NUM TIMES USED SHELTER 454 454 F1

V373 NUM TIMES ATTENDED SUPPORT GROUP 455 456 F2

V374 NUM TIMES ATTENDED THERAPY GROUP 457 458 F2

V375 NUM INDVDL COUNSELING SESSIONS ATTENDED 459 459 F1

ICPSR 9808 Page 59


V376 NUM ALANON/AA MEETINGS ATTENDED 460 461 F2

V377 NUM TMS ATTNDD CHEM DEPNDNCE INPATNT TMT 462 462 F1

V378 NUM OTHER SERVICES RECEIVED 463 464 F2

V379 SATISFACTION WITH SHELTER 465 465 F1


V380 SATISFACTION WITH SUPPORT GROUPS 466 466 F1


V381 SATISFACTION WITH THERAPY GROUP 467 467 F1


V382 SATISFACTION WITH INDVDL COUNSLNG SESSNS 468 468 F1


V383 SATISFACTION WITH ALANON/AA 469 469 F1


ICPSR 9808


V383 (cont.)

8 M not applicable

V384 SATISFACTION WITH CHEM DPNDNCY INPT TMT 470 470 F1


V385 SATISFACTION WITH OTHER SERVICES 471 471 F1


V386 USE OTHER RESRCS LST 6 MOS DUE TO RFRRL 472 472 F1

0 no 1 yes

V387 # TMS PTNR/FMLY ATND SUPRT GRP PST 6 MOS 473 473 F1

8 M not applicable

V388 # TMS PTNR/FMLY ATND THRPY GRP PST 6 MOS 474 475 F2

88 M not applicable

V389 # TMS PTNR/FMLY GOT INDV CNSLNG PST 6 MS 476 476 F1

8 M not applicable

V396 # TMS PTNR/FMLY ATND ALANON/AA PST 6 MOS 477 478 F2

V397 # TMS PTNR/FMLY ATND INPT TMT PST 6 MOS 479 479 F1

V398 # TMS PTNR/FMLY GOT OTHR SRVCS PST 6 MS 480 481 F2

V399 VCTM SATISFACTION WITH SUPPORT GROUP 482 482 F1

1 very satisfied

ICPSR 9808 Page 61


V399 (cont.)

2 satisfied 3 dissatisfied 4 very dissatisfied 8 M not applicable

V400 VCTM SATISFACTION WITH THERAPY GROUP 483 483 F1


V401 VCTM SATISFACTION WITH INDIVIDUAL CNSLNG 484 484 F1


V402 VCTM SATISFACTION WITH ALANON/AA 485 485 F1


V403 VCTM SATISFACTION WITH CHEM DEPNDNCY TMT 486 486 F1


V404 VCTM SATISFACTION WITH OTHER SERVICES 487 487 F1


ICPSR 9808


V405 HAD PERSONAL CONTACT WITH CITY ATTORNEY 488 488 F1


V406 CITY ATTORNEY LISTENED 489 489 F1


V407 CITY ATTY USED OPINIONS IN NEGOTIATIONS 490 490 F1


V408 CITY ATTY HELPED UNDERSTAND RIGHTS/OPTNS 491 491 F1


V409 SATISFIED WITH SERVICES OF CITY ATTORNEY 492 492 F1


V410 SATISFIED WITH COURT OUTCOME 493 493 F1

1 very satisfied 2 satisfied 3 dissatisfied 4 strongly dissatisfied

ICPSR 9808 Page 63


V410 (cont.)

8 M not applicable

V411 JUDGE'S SENTENCE REFLECTED OPINIONS 494 494 F1


V412 CONTCT WTH LEGL ADVCTE FRM MIP LST 6 MOS 495 495 F1

0 no 1 yes

V413 FEEL LEGAL ADVOCATES UNDERSTOOD NEEDS 496 496 F1


V414 FEEL LGL ADVCTS INFRMD ME OF RGHTS/OPTNS 497 497 F1


V415 SATISFIED WITH SRVICES OF LEGL ADVOCATES 498 498 F1


V422 GOTTEN ORDERS FOR PROTECTION LST 6 MOS 499 499 F1

0 no 1 yes

V423 LODGED COMPLAINT ON NEW CHRGES LST 6 MOS 500 500 F1

0 no

ICPSR 9808


V423 (cont.)

1 yes

V424 STARTED DIVORCE PROCEEDINGS LST 6 MOS 501 501 F1

0 no 1 yes

V425 STARTED OTHR LEGAL PROCEEDINGS LST 6 MOS 502 502 F1

0 no 1 yes

V432M MONTH THE FORM COMPLETED 503 504 F2

V432D DAY THE FORM COMPLETED 505 506 F2

V432Y YEAR THE FORM COMPLETED 507 508 F2

V433M MONTH THE FORM OBTAINED 509 510 F2

V433D DAY THE FORM OBTAINED 511 512 F2

V433Y YEAR THE FORM OBTAINED 513 514 F2

V434 OUTCOME OF ORDER FOR PROTECTION 515 515 F1

1 obtained 2 denied 3 dropped

V435 ORDR FOR PROTCTN EXCLDED PRTNR FRM HOUSE 516 516 F1


V436 KNOW WHERE TO GET ORDR AMENDD TO EXCLUDE 517 517 F1


V437 BEEN VIOLATNS OF THE ORDR FOR PROTECTION 518 518 F1

0 no

ICPSR 9808 Page 65


V437 (cont.)

1 yes 8 M not applicable

V438 PHYSICAL VIOLENCE 519 519 F1


V439 THREATS OF VIOLENCE 520 520 F1


V440 HARASSMENT BY PHONE 521 521 F1


V441 FOLLOWED BY PARTNER 522 522 F1


V442 HARASSMNT BY PARTNER'S FRIENDS/RELATIVES 523 523 F1


V443 VIOLATN OF VISITATN OR CUSTODY AGREEMENT 524 524 F1


V444 ENTERING YOUR HOME WITHOUT BEING ASKED 525 525 F1


ICPSR 9808


V445 OTHER 526 526 F1


V446 POLICE NOTIFIED OF ORDER FOR PROTECTION 527 527 F1


V447 POLICE ENFORCED THE ORDER FOR PROTECTION 528 528 F1


V448 NUM MINUTES POLICE TOOK TO ARRIVE 529 530 F2

V449 DID THE POLICE FILL OUT A REPORT 531 531 F1


V450 ORDR FR PROTECTN REDCED VIOLNCE BY PRTNR 532 532 F1

1 strongly agree 2 agree 3 disagree 4 strongly disagree

V451 WOULD GET ORDER FOR PROTECTION AGAIN 533 533 F1

0 no 1 yes 8 not applicable

ICPSR NOTE: The data collection instrument for this study is available only in hardcopy form upon request from ICPSR.

MPD 6001 A(7/82)

OFFENSE/INCIDENT

LOCATION OF OCCURRENCE

STAT./ORD NO DATE OCCURRED 609.224 10-16-86 [DTINC] TIME OCCURRED

PCT. OF OCC.

SQUAD/TELE-SERV. OFFICERS/CLERK EMPLOYEE NO. DATE REC'D. TIME REC'D

VICTIM (IF FIRM, NAME OF FIRM AND NAME OF PROPRIETOR) BUSINESS ADDRESS OFFICE/DEPT HOURS PHONE

HOME ADDRESS APART NO. PHONE

[VMZIP]

IF VICTIM IS RACE SEX AGE HT. WT (VERB/PHY RESIST. OCCUPATION

130 YES NO

OPERATION I.D. NO. A PERSON

PERSON REPORTING (VMRC) (VMSEX) (VMHT) (VMWT) BUSINESS ADDRESS [VMOCCUP]

OFFICE/DEPT HOURS Victim

PHONE

HOME ADDRESS APART NO. PHONE

I QUANTITY LOSS (COMPLETE AND DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY)

I MODEL NO

I SERIAL/I.D. NO. VALUE

NAME (IF KNOWN OR USED DURING OCC.) ADDRESS AGE D.O.B. [PRPAGE]

NAME (IF KNOWN OR USED DURING OCC.) ADDRESS AGE D.O.B.

MAKE MODEL COLOR-- LICENSE NO. STATE DRIVER (A.B) :

YEAR

DESCRIPTION

DETAILED INCLUDE ALL SPECIFIC INFORMATION RELATED TO CHECK BOXES ON PAGE 1 SUCH AS TYPE OF DEFORMITY, TATTOO NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF SUSPECTS, DEMAND PHRASE, ETC.

OFFENSE CLEARED BY: ARREST EXCEPTIONALLY INDEXED OTHER CASE UNFOUNDED SCORED

PROPERTY & EVIDENCE

INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING OFFENSE/INCIDENT REPORT - MPD 5002

l LEGIBLY PRINT, WRITE or TYPE ALL REPORTS MUST BE COMPLETED BY THE END . MAKE ONLY AN ORIGINAL - NO COPIES NEEDED OF YOUR SHIFT UNLESS DIRECTED TO DO SO

. COMPLETE ALL REQUESTED INFORMATION SOONER BY A SUPERIOR OFFICER

If a question DOES NOT APPLY, PUT l ALL REPORTS MUST BE APPROVED AND SIGNED BY

A DASH (-) IN THAT SPACE A SUPERIOR OFFICER

If the answer is UNKNOWN, PUT “X” l SEND THIS REPORT TO THE POLICE IN THAT SPACE TRANSCRIPTION UNIT

The Transcription Unit will complete the multiple part form and return your original to you, along with a copy for the station records

INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING DATA ENTRY OF STANDARDIZED DESCRIPTORS The DATA CODING BOXES provide a STANDARDIZED means of recording GENERAL INFORMATION about SUSPECTS SUSPECT AUTOS, LOCATION and METHOD OF OPERATION. They are numbered 1 through 26.

. QUESTIONS 1 THROUGH 19 DESCRIBE SUSPECTS “A” and “B”

l QUESTIONS 20 and 21 DESCRIBE THE SUSPECT AUTO l QUESTIONS 22 THROUGH 26 DESCRIBE THE

STRUCTURE/AREA OF OCCURRENCE AND METHOD OF OPERATION

THESE STANDARDIZED DESCRIPTORS PROVIDE ONLY GENERAL INFORMATION

l ANSWER EVERY QUESTION ON EACH OVERLAY BY MARKING APPROPRIATE DATA BOX WITH THE

. EVERY DATA ENTRY BOX MUST BE MARKED IN ONE OF THESE WAYS:

l THE APPROPRIATE NUMERICAL ANSWER l A DASH (-) FOR DOES NOT APPLY . AN “X” FOR UNKNOWN

l THERE ARE THREE QUESTION OVERLAYS FOR DATA ENTRY

YOU MUST PROVIDE DETAILED INFORMATION IN THE NARRATIVE PORTION OF YOUR REPORT! MOST ACCURATE ANSWER

1 WEAPON 2 RELATIONSHIP

1-REVOLVER 2-AUTOMATIC 3-OTHER H/GUN 4-RIFLE 5-SHOTGUN 6-SAWED S/GUN

7 DISABLING CHEMICAL

8-KNIFE 9-SHARP INSTR 10-BLUNT INSTR

11-EXPLOSIVE

1=HUSBAND 2=WIFE 3=IMMED FAMILY 4=BLOOD RELATIVE 5=MALE FRIEND 6 FEMALE FRIEND 7=LEGAL CUST 8=ACQUAINTANCE 9=ROOMMATE

10=HOMOSEXUAL 11=STRANGER

3 RACE 4 AGES

1=WHITE 2=BLACK 1= 0 12 - 3=NATIVE 2=13-17

AMERICAN 3=18-21

4=CHINESE 4=22-24

5-JAPANESE 5=25-29 Text Text Text 6=ASIAN UNDER 5 4 1=UNDER 100 1=THIN

7=ALASKAN 6=30-39 7=40=49 2= 5 5 - 5 8 2-100-140 2=MEDIUM

ESKIMO 8=50-51 5 SEX 3= 5 9 - 6 3=140-160 3=STOCKY

8=UNKNOWN 9=65 AND 4=MUSCULAR OVER 1=MALE 4= 6 1 - 6 3 4=160=180

2=FEMALE 5 OVER 6 3 5=180-200 5=OBESE

6=200-225 7=OVER 225

9 HAIR STYLE

1=BALD 2 THINNING 3 SHORT 4 SHLDR LG 5 AFRO MED 6 AFRO LGE 7 PROCESSED 8 CURLY 9 STAIGHT 10 WAVEY

10 HAIR COLOR

1=BLACK 2=BLOND 3=BROWN

5=GREY 6=SANDY 7=SALT

PEPPER 8=WHITE 9=FROST

10-OTHER

2.

Victim’s Name Assailant's Name

Address Phone Alternate #

Advocate Names Date

Did you get permission from victim to use information? Y N __

1. Details of the assault: describe injuries, weapons, witnesses, if OFP violation.

[INJURIES]

2. Past history of assaults by him: dates, community, court outcome if known

3. He will likely be released in the morning. Check those that apply:

she believes he will return and harm her again she would like the courts to order "no contact" upon release

she would not object if the court set bail (maximum $1400) she would like to get an Order for Protection (OFP)

when can she come downtown to get OFP?

4. The courts have a variety of options at the time of sentencing. Ask her opinion of each, check those that apply or make specific comments.

1). NO CONTACT yes no

2). JAIL TIME SERVED (maximum 90 days) she does not object if the court ordered it and/or she requests days no served jail time

3). JAIL TIME STAYED (maximum 90 days) she does not object if the court ordered it and/or she requests days no stayed jail time

4). FINE (maximum $700) or RESTITUTION (payment for damages)[VFINE]. yes, amount no fine or restitution

5). PROBATION with one or more of the following: - COUNSELING FOR VIOLENT BEHAVIOR yes no - ASSESSMENT OR TREATMENT for drugs alcohol other

Today’s Date Suspect Hearing

Charges (is the assault charge under state statute 609.224?)

Advocate Note in file? Y N NVC

Have you revised the note since the last hearing? Y N NVC

Outcome: Cont for Attny / Formal Complaint / Guilty / Not Guilty / Dismissed / CDSP / No Plea (CFD)

Next hearing date and time

Conditions of Release:

or

Negotiation:

Sentence:

Conditions:

City Attorney Comments:

Defendant’s Attny Comments:

Judge Comments:

Probation Officer

Response by Victim

Comments:

4

ARREST COMMUNICATIONS NOTEBOOK

VICTIM NAME Incident date

Victim PHONE

Assai lant Name

ADDRESS

No contact, date closed

DATE: first survey

Date

six month

one year

closed

Task/Notes

5

Date done Initials

NON-ARREST COMMUNICATIONS NOTEBOOK

Victim Name: Assailant Name: PHONE No Contact, date closed: Date of First Contact: Date of First Survey:

Incident date: Police Officers:

ADDRESS Legal Advocacy Used:OFP:

Date of Six Month Survey: Date of Year Survey: Date Closed:

Satisfied: Dissatisfied:-

Complaint: Court Advocacy Other:

Victim Response to police:

Date Task Accomplished/ Task Needed/Notes Date TN Done Advocate In i t i al

I l I I 1 I I I I I I I I I

I I I

I I I I I I

I I I I I I

I I I

I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

6

ARREST CASES - FIRST CONTACT

Def. Date: incident contact

Victim Caller

Address: Phone: W)

(introduction)

Sex: Male Female

Vict Perp

Race: Asian/Pac.Isle Black Hisp/Latino Nat. American White Other

1.

2.

3.

Was this the first time that the police have come to your home about a violent incident?

(If no) How many times have the police been called during the previous 6 months.

How would you rate your satisfaction with the police response? Comments: VS S- D VD

Vict Perp Income: unemployed

under $9,999 $10,000-19,999 $20,000-29,999

$30,000-39,999 $40,000+

Educ: under 12 yrs h.s.diploma

vo-tech school some college college grad

post-grad ************

- - . - - - -

- -

- -

- -

RELATIONSHIP

4. At the time of the incident, what was the status of your relationship? Married, living together

Married, not living tog Divorced, living tog

Not married, living tog Not married, not liv tog

Divorced, not living tog Other

5. How long have you been in this relationship? years months

6. What is the current status ? Married living tog

Married not liv tog Divorced, living tog Divorced, not liv tog

Not married, liv tog Not married, not liv tog

Other :

(if changed, why)

Next is a list of abusive actions that your partner may have done to you during this last incident or during other times. Please give me your best estimate of the number of times that your partner has committed each action during the last 6 months. If the last 6 months have not been representative please estimate how often this has happened in the past and comment upon the difference.

7. Recurring Violence

A. Screamed, swore at and/or insulted you

B. Physically threatened the children

C. Threatened to hit you or other threats of violence

D. Threatened to kill you

E. Threw something at you

F. Burned you

G. Pushed, grabbed, or shoved you

H. Slapped or spanked YOU

I. Bit or scratched you

J. Hit or tried to hit you with something

K. Forced sex on you or forced you to do something sexual that you didn’t want to do

L. Punched or kicked you

M. Threw you bodily

N. Beat you until you were unconscious

O. Choked or strangled you

P. Threatened you with a knife, gun or other weapon

Q. Used a knife, gun or other weapon on you

R. Other physical battering:

(describe:

6 mos prior comments:

A.

B C D.

E. -

F. -

G. -

H.- -

I. -

J. -

K. -

L.

M. -

N. -

O. -

P. -

Q. -

R.

7

Victim

(Ask if any changes in)

Address: Phone: H)

NON-ARREST CASES - FIRST CONTACT Date: Incident

1st contact --

Caller

W)

(introduction) Vict Perp Vict Perp

Sex : Male Female

Race : Asian/Pac Isle Black Hisp/Latino Nat. American White Other

Inc ome: unemployed under $9,999

$10,000-19,999 $20,000-29,999 $30,000-39,999

$40,000+

Educ: under 12 yrs h.s. diploma

vo-tech school some college college grad

post-grad

RELATIONSHIP 1. At the time of the incident, what was the status of your relationship?

Married, Married, living together not living tog

Divorced, Divorced, ,

living tog

Not married, living tog Other __ not living tog

Not married, not liv tog

2. How long have you been in this relationship? years months

3. What is the current status?

Married, Married,

living tog

Not married, liv tog

Divorced, living tog not liv tog Divorced, not liv tog

Not married, not liv tog Other:

(if changed, why)

4. Was this the first time that the police have come to your home about a violent incident?

5. (If no) How many times have the police been called before during the previous 6 months?

6. Was any object or weapon used against you? (If yes) describe:

7. Were you injured from this assault? Describe:

Y N

Y N

8.(If yes) Did the police see your injuries? Y N

9. Was the person who assaulted you there when the police arrived?

10. What actions did the police take?

Y N

11. How satisfied were you with the police response? comments:

VS S D VD

8

Next is a list of abusive actions that your partner may have done to you during this last incident or at other times. Please give me your best estimate of the number of times that your partner has committed each action during the last 6 months. If the last 6 months have not been representative please estimate how often this has happened in the past and comment upon the difference.

12. Recurring Violence

A. Screamed, swore at and/or insulted you

B. Physically threatened the children

C. Threatened to hit you or other threats of violence

D. Threatened to kill you

E. Threw something at you

F. Burned you


H. Slapped or spanked you



K. Forced sex on you or forced you to do something sexual that you didn’t want to do


M. Threw you bodily




Q. Used a knife, gun or other weapon on you

R. Other physical battering: (describe: )

6 mos prior comments

A.

B.

C.

D.

E.

F.

G.

H.

I.

J.

K.

L.

M.

N.

O.

P.

Q.

R.

13. How are you feeling about your safety now? (explore items listed on procedures sheet)

List her concerns and the referrals that you made:

14. Can we contact you again? Y N Phone:

If you cannot contact the victim, list the dates and times that you tried to reach her. least 3 times! Notify Sharon at 874-7063 and she will send a letter.

(Try at

9

Def:

Name

Phone: H)

RELATIONSHIP

Date: incident contact

Caller

W)

At the time of the incident, what was the status of your relationship? Married, Married,

living tog not liv tog

Divorced, living tog

Not married, liv tog Divorced, not liv tog


1.

2.

3.

4.

What is the current status of your relationship? Married, living tog Divorced, Married, not liv tog Not married, liv tog

Divorced, living tog not liv tog


If the status of your relationship has changed since the incident,. what were the reasons for the change?

If you are still in the relationship, how would you rate your satisfaction with the quality of your relationship and why? VS S D VD comments:

5. Have you been abused or assaulted again in the last 6 months? Y N --

6. (If yes) How many times have the police been called?

(if yes) note dates and describe incidents; Police involvement? court involvement?

(if yes) Were any of these incidents also a violation of an OFP? Y N

7. Have you started any legal proceedings?

Pressing Charges for assault O.F.P.

Divorce Other Explain

8. (If yes) what was the outcome? A. O.F.P. obtained denied dropped

a. b. c. d. e.

f. g. h. i. J.

B. Misdemeanor Case in process ass. pled guilty ass. convicted by jury ass. acquitted by jury continued for dismissal CDSP involvement? dismissed dropped down to misdemeanor negotiated to lesser charges negotiated to lesser sentence other

C. Felony Case

(if guilty) what was the sentence?

Y N 9. Did you contact a project staff person to help you?

10. (if yes) What services did she provide? supportive listening legal advocacy on charges obtain OFP info & referral to resources Transportation Other:

11. (if yes) How satisfied were you with the services that you received? comments: VS S D VD

Next is a list of abusive actions that your partner may have done to you. Please give me your best estimate of the number of times that your partner has committed each action during the last

six months.

12. First, was your partner in jail or out of state for any length of time during the past 6 months and how long was that period? in jail

out of state

10

13. Recurring Violence last 6 months comments

A. Screamed, swore at and/or insulted you A.

B. Physically threatened the children B.

C. Threatened to hit you or other threats of violence C.

D. Threatened to kill you D.

E. Threw something at you E.

F. Burned you F.


H. Slapped or spanked you



G.

H.

I.

J. K. Forced sex on you or forced you to do

something sexual that you didn't want to do K.


M. Threw you bodily




Q. Used a gun or other weapon on you

R. Other physical battering: describe

L.

M.

N.

O.

P.

Q.

14. Did you use any of the following as a result of a referral from the

services during the past 6 months intervention project? If so,

indicate how often and rate your satisfaction. (list name) # times Satisfaction

A. B. D. F.

Shelter: Support group : C. Therapy group: Individual Counseling: E. Alanon/AA Chemical Dependency Inpatient Tx G. Other:

15. Did your partner or anyone else in your family use other community resources during the past 6 months as a result of a referral from the intervention project? (if yes, list:

Y N- name # times Victim’s Satisfaction

A. Support group: B. Therapy group: C. Individual Counseling: D. Al anon/AA

E. Chemical Dependency Inpatient Tx F. Other :

16. Do you need any further information regarding services for yourself, partner, or family?

If yes, referrals made:

17. I was unable to make a 1 year follow-up contact. Please send a letter.-

11

Telephone Survey Questions About Orders For Protection

Date the form Completed DTFORM (21-26)

Date O.F.P. obtained DTOFP

a) 0.F.P. obtained denied dropped__ (35)

b) Did the O.F.P. exclude your partner from the house? Y N -- OFPEXCL (37)

c) (if no) Do you know where to get the 0.F.P. amended to have him/her excluded? Y N

1) Domestic Abuse Office 348-5073

(39)

2) Denise (only if they want an advocate to walk them through the process 348-5627)

d) Do you feel there have been any violations of the order for VIOLOFP protection? Y N -- (41)

e) (if yes, which of the following happened during the incident?

-Physical violence PHYSVIO (43)

-Threats of violence THRT VIO (45) -Harassment by phone PHHARR (47) -Followed by partner FLLWPTR (49)

-Harassment by partner’s friends or relatives HRSFREREL (51) -Violation of visitation or custody agreement VISCUST (53)

-Entering your home without being asked ENTER (55)

-Other OTHING -----------

f) (if yes) Were the police notified of the Order for Protection Violation? Y N No (59)

g) (if yes) Did the police enforce the O.F.P.? Y N

(if no) Why not:

h) (if yes) How long did it take for the police to arrive after they were called?

i) Did the police fill out a report? Y N Don't Know

Please tell me if you strongly agree, agree, disagree, or strongly disagree with the following statement.

j) I believe the OFP was helpful in reducing the violence by my partner.

SA S D SD

(67) OFPHELP

k) Would you get an 0.F.P. again if you needed one? Y N -- OFPAGAIN (69)

KEY: SA A D SD-- = -- _- -- Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree VS S D VD - - -- -- * Very Satisfied-_Satisfied_-

minneapolis intervention project, 1986-1987

Documents