inhibition of proliferation by c-myb antisense oligodeoxynucleotides in colon adenocarcinoma cell...

6
(CANCER RESEARCH 51, 2897-2901, June 1, 1991] Inhibition of Proliferation by c-myb Antisense Oligodeoxynucleotides in Colon Adenocarcinoma Cell Lines That Express c-myb1 Cecilia Melani, Licia Rivoltini, Giorgio Parmiani, Bruno Calabretta,2 and Mario P. Colombo2 Division of Experimental Oncology D, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy [C. M., L. R., G, P., M. P. C.J, and Department of Pathology and Fels Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Biology, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania [B. C.] ABSTRACT Steady-state mRNA levels of the protooncogene c-myb were measured by Northern blot analysis in the human colon carcinoma cell lines LoVo, the doxorubicin-resistant derivative LoVo/Dx, Colo 205, and HT 29. Overexpression of c-myb mRNA was detected in the Colo 205 cell line, probably because of gene amplification, while in human HT 29 cells c- myb was not expressed at a detectable level. Comparison between LoVo and LoVo/Dx cell lines showed that c-myb mRNA levels were much higher in the doxorubicin-resistant derivative than in the parental line, c- myb antisense Oligodeoxynucleotides inhibited cell proliferation only in the cell lines with detectable mRNA c-myb (LoVo, LoVo/DX, and Colo 205). The dose of antisense exerting inhibitory effect was related to the levels of c-myb mRNA expression. Inhibition of c-myb expression in antisense-treated LoVo/DX cells was demonstrated by the reverse tran- scriptase polymerase chain reaction technique. LoVo/Dx cells were induced to differentiate by treatment with dimeth- ylformamide to determine whether down-regulation of c-myb expression would accompany the process of differentiation. During the treatment with dimethylformamide the expression of c-myb decreased in parallel with the reduction of cell growth, while terminal differentiation of these cells was associated with changes in the expression of carcinoembryonic antigen and laminili receptor genes. Our findings demonstrate that the expression of c-myb is important for the proliferation of colon carcinoma cell lines and suggest that the role of this protooncogene is not restricted to cells of hematopoietic origin but is more general than previously thought. INTRODUCTION The protooncogene c-myb is preferentially expressed in he- mopoietic cells where it appears to play a key role in regulating cell proliferation and, perhaps, differentiation. In normal he matopoietic cells, c-myb protein levels vary according to the level of differentiation, with very low levels of c-myb protein being detected in terminally differentiated hematopoietic cells (1, 2). In the mouse Friend erythroleukemia cell line, F-MEL, constitutive expression of c-myb prevents terminal differentia tion, while in human myelogenous leukemia cell lines induced to differentiate, c-myb down-regulation is an early event that precedes differentiation (3-5). In nonhematopoietic cells c-myb expression has been de tected in small cell lung cancer (6), teratocarcinoma (7), neuro blastoma cell lines (8), primary colon tumors (9), and colon carcinoma cell lines (10), suggesting that c-myb expression is not strictly tissue specific but might be associated with cell proliferation in tissues of different origin and might play a role in early embryonal development (11). Although the association of c-myb with cell proliferation has been demonstrated in many Received 8/28/90; accepted 3/22/91. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. 1This work was supported by Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro. Milan, Italy, by NIH Grant CA4678, and by American Cancer Society Grant CH-455. B. C. is a Scholar of the Leukemia Society of America. 2To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Temple University, Broad and Ontario Streets, Philadelphia, PA 19140 [B.C.]; or Division of Experimental Oncology D. Instituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy [M.P.C.]. cell populations, the exact role of this gene in proliferation and differentiation is not yet well established. A useful tool to analyze the functional relevance of a gene product is to inhibit its expression by exposing target cells to synthetic Oligodeoxynucleotides complementary to the gene transcript (12). This approach has been used to demonstrate the functional relevance of c-myb expression in the hemopoietic system (13-15). Normal hematopoietic colony formation and proliferation of myelogenous leukemia cell lines were both affected by exposure to c-myb AS3 Oligodeoxynucleotides to an extent that depended on the proliferative capacity and level of differentiation of the cell population tested (13-15). To determine whether c-myb expression is also necessary for the proliferation of epithelial neoplastic cells, we first compared levels of c-myb expression in four colon carcinoma cell lines, LoVo, its doxorubicin-resistant subline LoVo/Dx, Colo 205, and HT 29, with those in normal colonie mucosa. Next, we exposed neoplastic cells to c-myb AS Oligodeoxynucleotides and found that inhibition of c-myb expression impairs colon carcinoma cell lines proliferation. Analysis of c-myb expression in the AS-treated LoVo/Dx cell line by the reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique revealed that c-myb mRNA levels were down-regulated by AS treatment. The im paired proliferation did not appear to be associated with cell differentiation, as shown by the morphology of AS-treated cells. In LoVo/Dx cells induced to differentiate by treatment with DMF, differentiation was associated with growth arrest, changes in the cell phenotype, and variation in the expression of c-myb, CEA, and one of the laminin receptor genes. MATERIALS AND METHODS Cell Culture and Oligodeoxynucleotide Treatment. LoVo, Colo 205, and HT 29 cell lines were all derived from human colon adenocarci- nomas (16). Doxorubicin resistance was induced in the LoVo/Dx subline by prolonged culture in medium containing doxorubicin (17). Cells were cultured in Ham's F-12 medium (Gibco) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (Biological Industries), pretreated for 15 min at 65°C,2 mM glutamine, and antibiotics (MA Bioproducts). Exponen tially growing cells were detached by trypsin-EDTA (Flow) and used to isolate nucleic acids. For Oligodeoxynucleotide treatment, 3x10" cells were seeded in 24-well plates (Costar) and c-myb S (5'-GCCCGAA- GACCCCGGCAC-3') or AS (5'-GTGCCGGGGTCTTCGGGC-3') Oligodeoxynucleotides (codons 2-7) were added to the culture medium for 3 days at 40, 30, and 20 Mg/ml, respectively. In the dose-response experiments the cells were exposed to three different decreasing doses of AS to obtain concentrations which were 'A, Vio,and '/«of the initial dosage described above; S oligomers were only given at the highest dose. Control cells were cultured in the same conditions without Oli godeoxynucleotides. After 3 days cells were recovered by mechanical detachment, counted, and analyzed for viability by trypan blue dye exclusion. To determine the cell proliferation rate, 3 x 10" S- and AS- treated and untreated cells were washed after treatment with Oligodeox ynucleotides, pulsed with [3H]dThd (1 ¿iCi/well), and incubated for 6 h 3The abbreviations used are: AS, antisense: S, sense: SSC, sodium saline citrate: SDS, sodium dodecyl sulfate; cDNA, complementary DNA; DMF, di methylformamide; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; dThd, thymidine. 2897 Research. on February 24, 2016. © 1991 American Association for Cancer cancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from

Upload: independent

Post on 28-Apr-2023

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

(CANCER RESEARCH 51, 2897-2901, June 1, 1991]

Inhibition of Proliferation by c-myb Antisense Oligodeoxynucleotides in ColonAdenocarcinoma Cell Lines That Express c-myb1

Cecilia Melani, Licia Rivoltini, Giorgio Parmiani, Bruno Calabretta,2 and Mario P. Colombo2

Division of Experimental Oncology D, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy [C. M., L. R., G, P., M. P. C.J, and Department of Pathology and Fels Institute for CancerResearch and Molecular Biology, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania [B. C.]

ABSTRACT

Steady-state mRNA levels of the protooncogene c-myb were measuredby Northern blot analysis in the human colon carcinoma cell lines LoVo,the doxorubicin-resistant derivative LoVo/Dx, Colo 205, and HT 29.Overexpression of c-myb mRNA was detected in the Colo 205 cell line,probably because of gene amplification, while in human HT 29 cells c-myb was not expressed at a detectable level. Comparison between LoVoand LoVo/Dx cell lines showed that c-myb mRNA levels were muchhigher in the doxorubicin-resistant derivative than in the parental line, c-myb antisense Oligodeoxynucleotides inhibited cell proliferation only inthe cell lines with detectable mRNA c-myb (LoVo, LoVo/DX, and Colo205). The dose of antisense exerting inhibitory effect was related to thelevels of c-myb mRNA expression. Inhibition of c-myb expression inantisense-treated LoVo/DX cells was demonstrated by the reverse tran-scriptase polymerase chain reaction technique.

LoVo/Dx cells were induced to differentiate by treatment with dimeth-ylformamide to determine whether down-regulation of c-myb expressionwould accompany the process of differentiation. During the treatmentwith dimethylformamide the expression of c-myb decreased in parallelwith the reduction of cell growth, while terminal differentiation of thesecells was associated with changes in the expression of carcinoembryonicantigen and laminili receptor genes.

Our findings demonstrate that the expression of c-myb is importantfor the proliferation of colon carcinoma cell lines and suggest that therole of this protooncogene is not restricted to cells of hematopoietic originbut is more general than previously thought.

INTRODUCTION

The protooncogene c-myb is preferentially expressed in he-mopoietic cells where it appears to play a key role in regulatingcell proliferation and, perhaps, differentiation. In normal hematopoietic cells, c-myb protein levels vary according to thelevel of differentiation, with very low levels of c-myb proteinbeing detected in terminally differentiated hematopoietic cells(1, 2). In the mouse Friend erythroleukemia cell line, F-MEL,constitutive expression of c-myb prevents terminal differentiation, while in human myelogenous leukemia cell lines inducedto differentiate, c-myb down-regulation is an early event thatprecedes differentiation (3-5).

In nonhematopoietic cells c-myb expression has been detected in small cell lung cancer (6), teratocarcinoma (7), neuroblastoma cell lines (8), primary colon tumors (9), and coloncarcinoma cell lines (10), suggesting that c-myb expression isnot strictly tissue specific but might be associated with cellproliferation in tissues of different origin and might play a rolein early embryonal development (11). Although the associationof c-myb with cell proliferation has been demonstrated in many

Received 8/28/90; accepted 3/22/91.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment

of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement inaccordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1This work was supported by Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro.Milan, Italy, by NIH Grant CA4678, and by American Cancer Society GrantCH-455. B. C. is a Scholar of the Leukemia Society of America.

2To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of

Pathology, School of Medicine, Temple University, Broad and Ontario Streets,Philadelphia, PA 19140 [B.C.]; or Division of Experimental Oncology D. InstitutoNazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy [M.P.C.].

cell populations, the exact role of this gene in proliferation anddifferentiation is not yet well established.

A useful tool to analyze the functional relevance of a geneproduct is to inhibit its expression by exposing target cells tosynthetic Oligodeoxynucleotides complementary to the genetranscript (12). This approach has been used to demonstratethe functional relevance of c-myb expression in the hemopoieticsystem (13-15). Normal hematopoietic colony formation andproliferation of myelogenous leukemia cell lines were bothaffected by exposure to c-myb AS3 Oligodeoxynucleotides to an

extent that depended on the proliferative capacity and level ofdifferentiation of the cell population tested (13-15).

To determine whether c-myb expression is also necessary forthe proliferation of epithelial neoplastic cells, we first comparedlevels of c-myb expression in four colon carcinoma cell lines,LoVo, its doxorubicin-resistant subline LoVo/Dx, Colo 205,and HT 29, with those in normal colonie mucosa. Next, weexposed neoplastic cells to c-myb AS Oligodeoxynucleotidesand found that inhibition of c-myb expression impairs coloncarcinoma cell lines proliferation. Analysis of c-myb expressionin the AS-treated LoVo/Dx cell line by the reverse transcriptasepolymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique revealed that c-mybmRNA levels were down-regulated by AS treatment. The impaired proliferation did not appear to be associated with celldifferentiation, as shown by the morphology of AS-treated cells.In LoVo/Dx cells induced to differentiate by treatment withDMF, differentiation was associated with growth arrest,changes in the cell phenotype, and variation in the expressionof c-myb, CEA, and one of the laminin receptor genes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cell Culture and Oligodeoxynucleotide Treatment. LoVo, Colo 205,and HT 29 cell lines were all derived from human colon adenocarci-nomas (16). Doxorubicin resistance was induced in the LoVo/Dxsubline by prolonged culture in medium containing doxorubicin (17).Cells were cultured in Ham's F-12 medium (Gibco) supplemented with

10% fetal calf serum (Biological Industries), pretreated for 15 min at65°C,2 mM glutamine, and antibiotics (MA Bioproducts). Exponen

tially growing cells were detached by trypsin-EDTA (Flow) and used toisolate nucleic acids. For Oligodeoxynucleotide treatment, 3x10" cellswere seeded in 24-well plates (Costar) and c-myb S (5'-GCCCGAA-GACCCCGGCAC-3') or AS (5'-GTGCCGGGGTCTTCGGGC-3')

Oligodeoxynucleotides (codons 2-7) were added to the culture mediumfor 3 days at 40, 30, and 20 Mg/ml, respectively. In the dose-responseexperiments the cells were exposed to three different decreasing dosesof AS to obtain concentrations which were 'A, Vio,and '/«of the initial

dosage described above; S oligomers were only given at the highestdose. Control cells were cultured in the same conditions without Oligodeoxynucleotides. After 3 days cells were recovered by mechanicaldetachment, counted, and analyzed for viability by trypan blue dyeexclusion. To determine the cell proliferation rate, 3 x 10" S- and AS-

treated and untreated cells were washed after treatment with Oligodeoxynucleotides, pulsed with [3H]dThd (1 ¿iCi/well),and incubated for 6 h

3The abbreviations used are: AS, antisense: S, sense: SSC, sodium saline

citrate: SDS, sodium dodecyl sulfate; cDNA, complementary DNA; DMF, dimethylformamide; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; CEA, carcinoembryonicantigen; dThd, thymidine.

2897

Research. on February 24, 2016. © 1991 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from

c-myì>ANTISENSE OLIGODEOXYNUCLEOTIDES

at 37°C;cells were then washed and fixed on glass fiber dishes by using

a cell harvester apparatus (Titertek Cell Harvester 550, Flow Laboratories), and radioactivity was measured using a beta counter. Nonspecific radioactivity was measured in the culture medium and eliminatedfrom the counts. Differentiation was induced in LoVo/Dx cells byadding DMF to the medium at a final concentration of 0.8% for 15-25 days; during this period, cells were collected every 4-5 days untilfully differentiated and analyzed for gene expression and [3H]dThd

incorporation.Nucleic Acids Preparation and Hybridization. Simultaneous isolation

of RNA and DNA from colon carcinoma cell lines and fresh normalcolonie mucosa was performed by the guanidine isothiocyanate/cesiumchloride method (18). Cells were dissolved in 4 M guanidine isothio-cyanate-25 mM sodium citrate-0.5% Sarkosyl-0.7% /3-mercaptoethanol

by vortexing. Cell lysate was loaded on a cesium chloride cushion (4.95M CsCl-0.1 M sodium acetate-5 mM EDTA) and centrifuged for 16 hat 35,000 rpm at 25°C.DNA was recovered from the viscous interphase

of the cesium chloride gradient after ultracentrifugation and total RNAfrom the pellet at the bottom of the tube. DNA was treated withproteinase K (0.2 mg/ml), extracted twice with phenol/chloroform/isoamylalcohol (25:24:1), and ethanol precipitated; total RNA wasextracted twice with chloroform/isobutanol and ethanol precipitated.Total RNA (20 g) was denatured, separated on 1% agarose/formalde-

hyde gel and transferred to nylon filters (Hybond N, Amersham). ForSouthern blotting, 5 ^g of DNA was digested with the appropriaterestriction enzyme under conditions suggested by the manufacturer(Biolabs), electrophoresed on a 0.8% agarose gel, and transferred tonylon filters. Nucleic acids were bound to filters at 80°Cfor 2 h.

Prehybridization and hybridization were performed as described (19).Filters were washed twice in 2x SSC-0.1% SDS at room temperaturefor 15 min and then two or three times in 0.2x SSC-1.0% SDS at 52°C

for 30 min. To quantitate c-myb expression densitometric scanning of

the Northern blots was performed on a LKB Ultroscan XL.Reverse Transcription PCR. Total RNA was extracted from 3-8 x

IO5 LoVo/Dx cells treated with c-myb oligodeoxynucleotide as above.RNA was precipitated with 20 g of Escherichia coli tRNA and resus-pended in Ix reverse transcriptase buffer (BRL); 100 ng of 3' c-mybprimer was annealed at 55°Cfor 90 min and the first strand of cDNA

was synthesized using 400 units of MoMLV reverse transcriptase(BRL) at 37°Cfor 1 h. The reaction was stopped and the mixturediluted in Ix Tag polymerase buffer and 5' and 3' primers were added

to a final concentration of 2 ng/liter each, together with 2.5 units ofTaq polymerase (Cetus). Sixty cycles of PCR were performed in aPerkin Elmer thermal cycler by annealing at 55°C,synthesizing at72°C,and denaturing at 95°C.Positive and negative controls were used

to exclude amplification of contaminating sequences. The PCR productwas run on a 2% Nu Sieve agarose gel and transferred to a nylon filter(Hybond N, Amersham) by alkaline blotting. The filter was hybridizedat 50°Cto a synthetic oligonucleotide probe which was 5'-end labeled

with T4 polynucleotide kinase (Promega Biotech, Madison, WI) and7-32P-ATP; after hybridization filters were washed in 2x SSC/0.1%SDS at room temperature for 10 min and once at 50°Cfor 30 minbefore overnight exposure to X-ray films at 80°C.

Probes and Oligonucleotides. The human c-myb probe is a 0.6-kilobase long EcoRl fragment derived from the BCM-8 clone (20). Thelaminin receptor probe is a 280-base pair Aval/EcoRl fragment, 98%homologous to the COOH terminus of human cDNA (21)4; CEA-1 is

a 540-base pair Pstl fragment of cDNA which recognizes the humancarcinoembryonic antigen gene (22), and the histone H3 probe is a 2.1-

kilobase £coRl fragment from the pFO535 clone (23). All purifiedinserts were labeled at high specific activity with the random-primingmethod using a--12P-deoxycytidine (24). A radioactive probe, 2 x IO6

cpm, were used per ml of hybridization solution, c-myb S and ASoligodeoxynucleotides, 5' and 3' primers for PCR, and the synthetic

50-mer c-myb probe were made using a DNA synthesizer according to

the previously published sequences (15).

RESULTS

Expression of c-myb Oncogene in Colon Carcinoma-derivedCell Lines. Northern blot hybridization revealed that c-myb wasexpressed in both LoVo/Dx cell lines and overexpressed inColo 205, while HT 29 as well as normal colonie mucosa didnot show detectable levels of transcript at an exposure timewhich, in our study, was never longer than 6 days (Fig. 1). c-myb mRNA was of the expected size, although the transcriptresolved as a doublet of 3.8 and 2.5 kilobases in both untreatedand DMF-treated LoVo/Dx cells (Fig. 1).

Densitometric scanning of the Northern blot revealed that c-myb expression was 15-fold higher in LoVo/Dx than in LoVo.The greater abundance of c-myb mRNA in LoVo/Dx than inLoVo cells appeared to correlate with the higher proliferativeactivity of this cell line, as demonstrated by pHjdThd incorporation assay (Figs. 1 and 2).

No gross gene rearrangements were detected by Southernblot analysis using Bgll-, Bgll- plus Kpnl-, Hindlll-, and EcoRl-digested DNA from these cell lines (not shown). The Southernblot of ///«¿Ill-digested DNA shown in Fig. 4 indicates thatgene amplification occurred only in Colo 205 cells.

Effect of c-myb Sense and Antisense Oligodeoxynucleotideson the Proliferation of Colon Carcinoma Cell Lines. As shownin Fig. 2A, cell number-proliferating LoVo, LoVo/Dx, and Colo205 cells exposed to the highest dose of c-myb AS oligodeoxynucleotides for 3 days was reduced by 55, 56, and 73% ascompared to that in cells grown in medium alone. [3H]dThd

incorporation was reduced by 84% in LoVo, 83% in LoVo/Dx,and 68% in Colo 205 cells after exposure to AS oligodeoxynucleotides (Fig. 2B). No differences in proliferative activity were

f

Kb

4.4-

2.4-||

B

4 F. R. Burns, unpublished results.

Fig. 1. A, Northern blot analysis of c-myb expression in colon carcinoma celllines. Lanes a, LoVo/Dx; ¿>,DMF-treated LoVo/Dx; c, LoVo; </, Colo 205; e,HT 29;/ normal colonie mucosa. B, ethidium bromide staining of the same filteras control of the amount of RNA present in each lane. Ordinale, kilobases.

2898

Research. on February 24, 2016. © 1991 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from

c-myb ANTISENSE OLIGODEOXYNUCLEOTIDES

detected in untreated or myb sense-treated cells. Proliferationof HT 29 cells in which the expression of c-myb mRNA wasnot detected did not appear to be significantly affected by c-

myb AS treatment (Fig. 2).A second group of experiments was designated to determine

whether lowering the AS doses added to the medium wouldresult in differential inhibition of cell proliferation in the variouscell lines and whether the effect correlated with c-myb mRNA

levels. LoVo/Dx and Colo 205 205 cells were not inhibited bythe lowest dose of AS oligodeoxynucleotides which, instead,was still effective on LoVo cells (Fig. 3). Analysis of c-mybmRNA levels was made in oligodeoxynucleotide-treated anduntreated LoVo/Dx cells. From LoVo/Dx total RNA a 234-nucleotide segment corresponding to the 3'-untranslated region

of c-myb mRNA from nucleotides 2254-2487 was generatedby means of reverse transcription and PCR amplification withhuman c-wye-specific primers (15, 20). Southern blot hybridization of the PCR products to a 50-mer c-myb oligomer (15)revealed the presence of c-myb transcripts in untreated or mybsense-treated cells but not in LoVo/Dx cells exposed to c-myb

antisense oligodeoxynucleotides, demonstrating the specific inhibition of gene expression by antisense oligodeoxynucleotides(Fig. 4). In addition 2-microglobulin mRNA levels were constant in all the samples (not shown).

Effect of DMF Treatment on LoVo/Dx Cells. LoVo/Dx cellstreated with DMF lost their normal cubic morphology andbecame spindle shaped, with protruding appendices, and grewin clumps that tightly adhered to the culture dish. Terminaldifferentiation occurred in 15-25 days and was associated withgrowth arrest, increasing production of desmoplakin, and reduced vimentin levels, as demonstrated by indirect immunoflu-orescence (not shown). During the treatment with DMF weanalyzed the expression of c-myb and found that it remainedhigh for 11 days, in association with a strong cell proliferationrate, documented by histone H3 expression (Fig. 5) and the[3H]dThd incorporation (not shown). When differentiating

Lo Vo/Dx cells stopped proliferating, the expression of histoneH3 and c-myb sharply decreased and remained very low untilthe cells became fully differentiated (Figs. 1 and 6). In the sameperiod the mRNA levels of the gene CEA, which is known to

IO0X

OU

4-3-2-1

•D

LOVO/DxP??!|Ti—==__SLCMO\T1==.

•D

CXX.O2050

HT29lÄI

250

noX

O

200-

150-

lü 100

50 -

DLOVO/DXHLOVOjrö

COLO205I,-*-.0ÕJC.IrHT29à

MEDIUM ANTISENSE MEDIUM SENSE ANTISENSE

TREATMENT TREATMENT

Fig. 2. Effect of treatment with AS versus S oligodeoxynucleotides or normal culture medium on colon carcinoma cell growth estimated by cell count (A) and|3H]thymidine incorporation (B). Experiments were done in duplicate and repeated three times.

BTREATMENT

AS 1

TREATMENT

AS 1/40

AS 1/10

AS 1/3

AS1

SENSE

D CXXD

• LOVO DX

D LCMD

iINHIBITION OF 3HTdR INCORPORATION (%) % OF INHIBITION (CELL COUNT)

Fig. 3. Dose-dependent effect on proliferation of colon carcinoma cell lines treated with AS or S oligodeoxynucleotides, estimated as percentage of (B) and [3H]-dThd inhibition of cell number incorporation (A).

2899

Research. on February 24, 2016. © 1991 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from

c-myb ANTISENSE OLIGODEOXYNUCLEOTIDES

Kb

4.3-

2.3-

0 4 8 11 15 22 25kb

3.83.5

b __ 0.6

Fig. 4. Southern blot analysis of ////ií/111-digestedDNA from: a, LoVo/Dx; ¿>,DMF-treated LoVo/Dx; c, LoVo; d, Colo 205; e, HT 29, hybridized with a e-myh probe (0.6-kilobase EcoRl fragment). Ordinate, kilobases.

bed

3.53.0

234 bp-

Fig. 5. Expression of c-myb in LoVo/Dx cells treated with sense (a) or antisense(¿>)oligodeoxynucleotides or untreated (c). estimated by PCR amplification of c-myb cDNA; d. contains amplified c-myb DNA from the same cells as control, bp,base pair.

be expressed in the LoVo cell line (16) and appears to be relatedto colonie cell differentiation (26), increased during LoVo/Dxterminal differentiation (Fig. 6).

DISCUSSION

Several studies have provided evidence that c-myb is preferentially expressed in immature hematopoietic cells and is important in the regulation of cell proliferation as hematopoieticprogenitors differentiate into precursors and terminally differentiated cells (3, 5, 14). However, c-myb expression has beendetected in many other cell populations, including neoplasticand embryonal tissues, suggesting that c-myb function is notrestricted to hematopoietic cells. Studies in primary humancolon carcinomas have suggested in many cases a correlationbetween detectable c-myb mRNA levels and the tumor growthfraction (9). Since c-myb mRNA was also detected in coloncarcinoma cell lines, we carried out the present studies todetermine whether c-myb expression is required for the proliferation of colon carcinoma lines expressing high levels of c-

myb mRNA. Of the four colon carcinoma cell lines analyzedLoVo, LoVo/Dx, and Colo cells had detectable levels of c-mybtranscripts, whereas in HT 29 and in normal colonie mucosa c-myb mRNA levels were not detectable, c-myb mRNA levels

differed among the cell lines, with the highest expression in

Fig. 6. Expression of c-myb (a), historie H3 (b) and CEA (c) during differentiation of LoVo/Dx cells induced by DMF. Absicca, period of treatment (days)with DMF. The ethidium bromide-stained gel photographed under UV light (d)was used to quantitate total RNA loaded and transferred during Northern blot.Ordinate, kilobases.

Colo 205; the doxorubicin-resistant LoVo/Dx showed a muchhigher expression than the parental LoVo cells. In LoVo/Dxcells, the c-myb transcript resolved as a doublet which wasconfirmed in other, different Northern blots. The significanceof these two transcripts remains unclear, although differencesin the cap site have been reported to modify the length of c-myb transcripts in mouse thymocytes, suggesting a possiblemechanism utilized to regulate the oncogene function (27).DNA analysis revealed amplification of c-myb in Colo 205cells, confirming previously reported findings (10), while theother cell lines showed no evidence of gene alterations. Thefunctional significance of c-myb expression in these colon carcinoma cell lines was investigated by exposure to c-myb ASoligodeoxynucleotides previously shown to inhibit hemopoieticcell growth (13-15). This treatment reduced cell proliferationin all cell lines expressing c-myb (Fig. 2/1). ['HjThymidine

incorporation in the same cell lines was even more sharplyinhibited, suggesting that inhibition of myb expression (Fig. 5)prevented DNA synthesis in most colon carcinoma cells (Fig.2B). Moreover, treatment with different doses of AS for thesame time resulted in a different effect on proliferation of theresponsive cells. LoVo cells which express low levels of c-myb

2900

Research. on February 24, 2016. © 1991 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from

c-myh ANTISENSE OLIGODEOXYNUCLEOTIDES

were inhibited at the lowest dose of AS oligodeoxynucleotides,while LoVo/Dx and Colo 205 cells were not affected. Proliferation of the HT 29 cell line in which c-myb mRNA is notexpressed at detectable levels was, as expected, not affected byexposure to c-myb AS oligodeoxynucleotides.

Our results suggest that the proliferation of some neoplasticcell lines of epithelial origin is maintained by high levels of c-myb expression. This notion, in turn, suggests that the role ofc-myb is more general than previously thought, since, whenactivated, it might be involved in the control of cell cycleprogression at the G,/S transition in colon epithelial cells inaddition to hematopoietic cells and mitogen-stimulated normalT-lymphocytes (13, 14, 28). Although the mechanisms involvedin cell cycle regulation are not known, it is likely that the DNA-binding and -transactivating properties of the c-myb protein arethe relevant features for c-myb function (29-31). However, c-

myb expression is not an absolute requirement for the proliferation of neoplastic epithelial cell lines as shown by the complete independence of HT 29 cell proliferation from the synthesis of c-myb protein.

Treatment of LoVo/Dx DM F resulted in a reduction of c-myb expression, indicating that c-myb down-regulation duringdifferentiation is a common phenomenon, the only knownexception being the embryonic stem cell line "cce" in which c-

myb mRNA levels increase following differentiation into em-bryoid bodies (11). In our experimental system, c-myb expression is related to the proliferative capacity of the cells; in factas the differentiating agent DMF reduces the cell proliferationrate documented by the decrease of the mRNA levels of the Sphase-specific histone H3 gene (23), there is also a concomitantdecline of c-myb mRNA expression; these changes in geneexpression occur before the cells have acquired a more differentiated phenotype. When fully differentiated, the LoVo/Dxcells show a reduced synthesis of laminin receptor, a highexpression of CEA, which progressively increases during theDMF treatment, and a stable low level expression of the c-myboncogene.

Our data demonstrate that inhibition of c-myb expressiondoes not induce differentiation of the colon carcinoma celltested and are in agreement with the findings reported for theHL-60 leukemia cell line (13). It is possible, however, that theexposure time to the AS oligomer was too short to allowcommitment to differentiation and the initial slopes of thisprocess, considering that DMF requires 15-25 days to inducedifferentiation. Additional experiments will reveal whether alonger exposure of the cells to c-myb AS oligodeoxynucleotidescan induce differentiation or whether, in conjunction withDMF, they can shorten the time necessary for this process.

REFERENCES

1. Kaslan. M. B.. Slamon. D. J.. and Civin. C. I. Expression of the protooncogene c-myb in normal human hematopoietic cells. Blood. 73: 1444-1451. 1989.

2. Kastan. M. B.. Stone. K. D.. and Civin. C. I. Nuclear oncoprotein expressionas a function lineage, differentiation stage, and proliferative status of normalhuman hematopoietic cells. Blood. 74: 1517-1524. 1989.

3. Clarke. M. F.. Kukowska-Latallo. J. F.. Westin. E.. Smith. M., and Pro-chownick, E. V. Constitutive expression of a c-myb cDNA blocks Friendmurine erythroleukemia cell differentiation. Mol. Cell. Biol.. S: 884-892,1988.

4. Westin. E. H.. Gallo. R. C.. Arya. S. K.. Eva. A.. Souza. L. M.. Baluda. M.A., Aaronson. S. A., and Wong-Staal, F. Differential expression of the AMVgene in human hematopoietic cells. Proc. Nati. Aead. Sci. USA, 79: 2194-2198, 1987.

5. Craig. R. W., and Bloch, A. Early decline a c-myb oncogene expression inthe differentiation of human myeloblastic leukemia IMI 11 cells induced

with 12-tetradecanoylphorbol-I.Vacetate. Cancer Res., 44: 442-445. 1984.6. Griffin. C. A., and Baylin, S. B. Expression of the c-myb oncogene in human

small cell lung carcinoma. Cancer Res., 45: 272-275. 1985.7. Janssen, J. W. G.. Vernole. P., de Boer, P. A. J.. Oosterhuis, J. W., and

Collard. J. G. Sublocalisation of c-myb to 6q21-q23 by in situ hybridizationand c-myb expression in human tertocarcinoma with 6q rearrangements.Cytogcnet. Cell. Genet.. 41: 129-135. 1986.

8. Thiele. C. J., Cohen. P. S.. and Israel. M. A. Regulation of c-myb expressionin human neuroblastoma cells during retinoic acid-induced differentiation.Mol. Cell. Biol., 8: 1677-1683. 1988.

9. Torelli, G., Venturelli, D., Colo' A., Zanni, C., Selleri, L., Moretti, L„Calabretta. B., and Torelli. U. Expression of c-myb proto-oncogene and othercell cycle related genes in normal and neoplastic colonie mucosa. CancerRes.. 47: 5266-5269. 1987.

10. Alitalo. K.. Winqvist. R.. Lin, C. C., de la Chappelle. A.. Schwab. M., andBishop, J. M. Aberrant expression of an amplified c-myb oncogene in twocell lines from a colon carcinoma. Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA, 81: 4534-4538. 1984.

11. Dyson. J. P., Poirier. F.. and Watson. R. J. Expression of c-myb in embryonalcarcinoma cells and embryonal stem cells. Differentiation. 42: 24-27, 1989.

12. Zamecnik. P. C.. and Stephenson, M. L. Inhibition of Rous sarcoma virusreplication and cell transformation by a specific oligodeoxynucleotide. Proc.Nati. Acad. Sci. USA, 75: 280-284. 1978.

13. Anfossi, G., Gewirtz, A. M., and Calabretta. B. An oligomer complementaryto c-myb encoded mRNA inhibits proliferation of human myeloid leukemiacell lines. Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA, 86: 3379-3383. 1989."

14. Gewirtz. A., and Calabretta. B. A c-myb antisense oligodeoxynucleotideinhibits normal human hematopoiesis in vitro. Science (Washington DC),242: 1303-1306. 1988.

15. Caracciolo, D., Venturelli. D.. Valtieri. M.. Peschle, C.. Gewirtz. A. M.. andCalabretta. B. Stage related proliferative activity determines c-myb functionalrequirements during normal human hematopoiesis. J. Clin. Invest., 85: 55-61, 1990.

16. Trainer, D. L., Kline. T., McCabe, F. L., Faucette, L. F., Feild, J., Chaikin.M., Anzano, M., Rieman. D.. Hoffstein, S.. Li, D. J.. Gennaro. D.. Buscarino.C., Lynch. M., Poste, G., and Greig. R. Biological characterization andoncogene expression in human colorectal carcinoma cell lines. Int. J. Cancer,41: 287-296. 1988.

17. Grandi. M., Ceroni. C., and Giuliani. F. C. Isolation and characterization ofa human colon adenocarcinoma cell line resistant to doxorubicin. Br. J.Cancer, 54:515-518. 1986.

18. Davis. L. G., Dibner. M. D.. and Battey, J. F. Basic Methods in MolecularBiology. New York: Elsevier. 1986.

19. Colombo, M. P., Melvold. R. W., and Wettstein, P. J. Inheritance of amutant histocompatibility gene and a new mammary tumor virus genome inthe B6.KH-84 mouse strain. Immunogenctics, 26: 99-104. 1987.

20. Majello, B., Kenyon, L., and Dalla Pavera. R. Human c-myb proto-oncogene:nucleotide sequence of cDNA and organization of the genomic locus. Proc.Nati. Acad. Sci. USA. 83: 9636-9640. 1986.

21. Wewer. U. M., Liotta. L. A.. Jaye. M., Ricca. G. A.. Drohan. W. N.,Claysmith, A. P.. Rao. C. N., Wirth, P., Coligan, J. E.. Albrechtsen. R..Mudry. M.. and Sobel. M. E. Altered levels of laminin receptor mRNA invarious human carcinoma cells that have different abilities to bind laminin.Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA, 83: 7137-7141. 1986.

22. Zimmerman, W., Ortlieb, B.. Friedrich. R., and Von Kleist, S. Isolation andcharacterization of cDNA clones encoding the human carcinoembryonicantigen reveal a highly conserved repeating structure. Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci.USA, 84: 2960-2964. 1987.

23. Plumb. M.. Stein. J., and Stein. G. Coordinate regulation of multiple histonemRNA during the cell cycle in HeLa cells. Nucleic Acids Res.. //: 2391-2410. 1983.

24. Feinberg, A. P.. and Vogelstein. B. A technique for radio-labeling DNArestriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity. Anal. Biochem../J2.-6-I3, 1983.

25. Saiki, R. K., Gelfand, D. H., Stofell, S., Scharf, S. J., Higuchi, R.. Horn, T.,Mullils, K. B.. and Erlich, A. Primer directed enzymatic amplification ofDNA with a thermostable DNA polymerase. Science (Washington DC), 239:487-491. 1988.

26. Ahen, D. J., Kinoshita, K., Nakane, P. K.. and Brown. W. R. Differentiatedexpression of carcinoebryonic antigen and secretory component during co-Ionic epithelial cell differentiation and in colonie carcinomas. Gastroenter-ology, 93: 1330-1338, 1987.

27. Watson, R. J., Dyson. P. J.. and McMahon. J. Multiple c-myb transcriptcapsites are variously utilized in cells of mouse haematopoietic origin. EMBOJ., 6: 1646-1651. 1987.

28. Gewirtz. A. M., Anfossi, G., Venturelli. D.. Valpreda. S., Sims, R.. andCalabretta. B. G,/S transition in normal human T-lymphocytes requires thenuclear protein encoded by c-myb. Science (Washington DC), 245: 180-183,1989.

29. Biedenkapp, H., Borgmeyer. U.. Sippel, A. E., and Klempnauer. K. H. Viralmyb oncogene encodes a sequence-specific DNA binding activity. Nature(Lond.), 335: 835-837, 1988.

30. Weston. K.. and Bishop, J. M. Transcriptional activation by the \-myboncogene and its cellular progenitor c-myh. Cell, 58: 85-93, 1989.

31. Ness, S. A., Marknell, A., and Graf. T. The \-myb oncogene product bindsto and activates the promyelocytic-specific MIM-1 gene. Cell. 59: 1115-1125. 1989.

2901

Research. on February 24, 2016. © 1991 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from

1991;51:2897-2901. Cancer Res   Cecilia Melani, Licia Rivoltini, Giorgio Parmiani, et al.  

mybThat Express c-Oligodeoxynucleotides in Colon Adenocarcinoma Cell Lines

AntisensemybInhibition of Proliferation by c-

  Updated version

  http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/51/11/2897

Access the most recent version of this article at:

   

   

   

  E-mail alerts related to this article or journal.Sign up to receive free email-alerts

  Subscriptions

Reprints and

  [email protected] at

To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal, contact the AACR Publications

  Permissions

  [email protected] at

To request permission to re-use all or part of this article, contact the AACR Publications

Research. on February 24, 2016. © 1991 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from