final closure comm - wisconsin dnr

August27,2004

Joni Nykiel SBC Environmental Management 36 South Fairview, 41

h Floor Park Ridge, IL 60068

RE: Final Closure

ENVIRONMENTAL & REGULATORY SERVICES DIVISION BUREAU OF PECFA

P.O. Box 8044 Madison, Wisconsin 53708-8044

TDD #: (608) 264-8777 Fax#: (608) 267-1381 Jim Doyle, Governor

Cory L. Nettles, Secretary

Commerce# 53280-0001-45 WDNR BRRTS # 03-41-002600 Ameritech WI Bell Facility, 845 N 35th St, Milwaukee

Dear Ms. Nykiel:

The Wisconsin Department of Commerce (Commerce) has received all items required as conditions for closure of the site referenced above. This case is now listed as "closed" on the Commerce database and will be included on the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) Geographic Information System (GIS) Registry of Closed Remediation Sites to address residual contamination. It is in your best interest to keep all documentation related to the environmental activities that were conducted.

If residual contamination is encountered in the future, it must be managed in accordance with all applicable state and federal regulations. If it is determined that any remaining contamination poses a threat, the case may be reopened and further investigation or remediation may be required.

Thank you for your efforts to bring this case to closure. If you have any questions, please contact me in writing at the letterhead address or by telephone at (608) 261-2515.

Sincerely,

E.~' Hydrogeologist Site Review Section

cc: Troy Thompson, TN & Associates Inc Case File

File Ret: G:\Eiectronic Mailbox\532\53280\000145\Ciose·Rnal 082704.doc

........... T N & Associates, Inc.

Engineering and Science

August 20, 2004

Mr. David Blair, Hydrogeologist PECF A Site Review Section Wisconsin Department of Commerce P.O. Box 8044 Madison, WI 53708-8044

RE: Supplemental Closure Information Ameritech Wisconsin Bell Facility 845 N 35 111 Street Milwaukee, WI 53280

Commerce#: 53280-0001 -45 DNR #: 03-41-002600 TN&A Project No.: 2004025

Dear Mr. Blair:

RECEIVED AUG 2 .3 2004

L · .... w. ti tviuN

Enclosed please find the additional documentation requested in your November 22, 2000 letter for closure ofthe above referenced site. In addition, we reviewed the original basis for the closure request described in an earlier TN&A letter report (Groundwater Monitoring Results and Site Evaluation for Case Closure, dated September 7, 2000) in light of subsequent site history. We conclude there have been no changes at the site or in the sunounding area that affect the conclusions in that report supporting site closure.

In your letter you requested that a deed notification addressing residual groundwater contamination at the property be drafted and placed on the property deed. Since the time of your letter the Wisconsin Department ofNatural Resources (WDNR) has begun requiring listing of sites with residual groundwater contamination on their Geographic Information System (GIS) Registry of Closed Remediation Sites (in lieu ofthe use of groundwater use deed notices). Therefore, we have completed the package ofWDNR required documentation for registering the site on the GIS Registry. We have submitted a copy to the WDNR and included a copy with this letter.

Also, enclosed with this letter are copies of the following requested infom1ation: (1) monitoring well abandonment forms, (2) tank disposal documentation (no sludge was generated), and (3) investigative waste disposal docmnentation.

l033N.MayfairRoad, Suite200 • Milwaukee,WI53226 • 414-257-4200 • FAX414-257-2492

Please contact us at (414) 257-4200 if you have any questions, or if we can provide you with further assistance.

Sincerely,

T N & Associates, Inc.

1/7--r( '7i; ---------Troy R. Thompson, PG, CPG, CHMM Project Scientist

Attachments

Cc: Ms. Joni Nykiel, SBC/Ameritech

( - - e-( DavidS. Voight, PG, CPG . Sr. Hydrogeologist/Project Manager

P:\2004 Projects\2004025-SBC 35th Street\Communications\35th St Clos Package Transm Letter, WComm.doc

State of Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources

WELL/DRILLHOLE/BOREHOLE ABANDONMENT Form 3300-SW 11-89

All abandonment work shall be performed in accordance with the provisions of Chapters NR 111, NR 112 or NR 141 , Wis. Admin. Code, whichever is applicable. Also, see instructions on back.

{1) GENERAL INFORMATION (2) FACIUTY NAME

W ell/Drillho le/Borehole I County Original Well Owner (IT Known) Location t11vJ f'-1\U..f ft.>~ f.... vJt~to/\J)IN 'Bt..t.-L

PfjE Present Well Owner

.5'£ 1/4 of {JJ)Lj 1/4 of Sec .~ ; T ._z_ N; R. ~ fi w ~ ME. Q.-1 'lfft+ I') [!;/: (If applicable) Street or-Route SC£ COilP fU~L F

Gov't Lot GridNwnber YS'i;:;- 1 SS'~P~ J~5- F;J_I~I/HuJ Lf ' ~ ' . 'Alt.£ I ,(}6-€. I'--Grid Location City, State, Zip Code ~(JU

ft. D N. D s .. ft . 0 E: D w. Ml<...WA,0~<;:::E_ /'-' I S32-J3 Civil Town Name rac1llty Well No. and/or Name (ll Applicable) 'WI Uruque Well No.

;rJjLVI-.4U k.E.E.- M"-f-1- . . . Street Address ol Well Reason For Abandonment

9tl5 f\J . -.3 5 rn Sr. St rc CLo s u. R.E City, Village ·

s-72-t~ Date of Abandonment

D( -b'L·· C.::>/ lYJ /t,.W ,4Jt)!<_c6 1

(A}L._

WELL/DRILLHOLE/BOREHOLE INFORMATION (j) Original Well/Drillhole/Borehole Construction Completed On (4) Depth to Water (Feet)

(Dale) Pump & Piping Removed? D Yes 01'-h~ Not Applicable

Liner(s) Removed? D Yes D N:l 0 Not Applicable

0 Monitoring Well Construction Report Available? Screen Removed? D Yes r8 N:l r J Not Applicable

0 WaterWell DYes ON:l Casing Left in Place? f)a' yes 0 N:l 0 Drillhole . If No, EXplain

0 Borehole Was Casing Cut Off Below Surface? Ga Yes ONJ

Construction Type: Did Sealing Material Rise to Surface? ~Yes D N:l ~ Drilled 0 Driven (Sandpoint) 0 Dug Did Material Settle After 24 Hours? 0 Yes _g) N:l 0 Other (Specify) If Yes, Was Hole Retopped? 0 Yes 0 N>

Formation Type: (5) Required Method of Placing Sealing Material

~ Unconsolidated Formation D Bedrock 16') e dn w Pipe-Gravity 0 Conducto~ Pipe-Pumped

0 Dump Bailer 0 Other (Explain)

l~ .j Casing Diameter (ins.) ..,

(6) Sealing Materials For monitoring wells and Total Well Deplh (ft.) '---(From groundsurface) 0 Neat Cemenl Groul monitoring weU boreholes only

0 Sand-Cement (Concrete) Grout

Casing Deplh (ft.) 1).1 0 Concrete I 0 Bentonite Pellets · I 0 Clay-Sand Slurry I 0 Granular Bentonite

Was Well Annular Space Gro\;~? D Yes ONJD Unknown 0 Bentonite-Sand Slurry I D Bentonite - Cernen! 0ro!l1 I

If Yes, To What Depth? Feet ~ Chipped Bentonite I

(T) Sealing Material Used

-No. Yar~ Mix Ratio or Mud Weight From (Ft.) To (Ft.) Sacks Sealant

orYolwne

C.f{,Wf.D fft{'lor--\l"iE Surface rt.i ,._:!;!:>eft-

(lS) Comments:

(9)



All abandonment work shall be performed in accordance with the provisions of Chapters NR 111, NR 112 or NR 141, Wis. Admin . Code, whichever is appl icable. Also, see instructions on back.

~ 1/4 of NW 1/4 of Sec.~ T.__:::j_ N; R. _.2J SBC applicable)

Gov't Lot Grid Nwnber

Grid Location

ft. D N. D s .. ft.

WELL/DRILLHOLE/BOREHOLE INFORMATION (jJ Originale_;prillhole/Borehole Construction Completed Un (4) Depth to Water (Feet)

{Date) /.{.2 ~t;;z ~ 2 z. Pump & Piping Removed? D Yes 0NJ[8) Not Applicable Liner\s) Removed?

D Yes 0N:l(8] Not Applicable 0 Monitoring Well Construction Report Available? Screen Removed? DYes ~:ll Not Applicable

0 WaterWell G;'l Yes ONJ Casing Left in Place? '?{Yes 0 Drillhole If No, Explain

0 Borehole Was Casing Cut Off Below Surface? [ia Yes 0 N:l

Construction Type: Did Sealing Material Rise to Surface? fRJ Yes 0 N:l ~ Drilled 0 Driven (Sandpoint) 0 Dug Did Material Settle After 24 Hours? 0 Yes g] N:J 0 Other (Specify) · If Yes, Was Hole Retopped? 0 Yes 0 N>


t!SJ Unconsolidated Formation 0 Bedrock ~ e ,4n tf\r Pipe-Gravity 0 Conductor Pipe-Pwnped 0 Dump Bailer 0 Other (Explain)

Total Well Depth (ft.) /&COS Casing Diameter (ins.) 2... (6) Sealing Materials For monitoring wells and (From groundsurface) 0 Neat Cement Grout monitoring well boreholes only

lB.$;-0 Sand-Cement (Concrete) Grout

Casing Depth (ft.) 0 Concrete I 0 Bentonite Pellets I 0 Clay-Sand Slurry I 0 Granular Bentonite

Was Well Annular Space Grou~? 0 Yes ON:J 0 Unknown 0 Bentoniie-Sand Slurry I 0 Bentonite - Cement 0rout I

If Yes, To What Depth? Feet i8) Chipped Bentonite I

(!) Sealing Material Used

N_o. !ar~ Mix Ratio or Mud Weight From (Ft.) To (Ft.) Sacks Sealant

orVolwne

CH 1Wf.D 5ft\'tor-\I'TE Surface \8,~ --:!;b"f't

(lSJ Comments.

(9)


WELLIDRILLHOLE/BOREHOLE ABANDONMENT Form 3300-5W 11-89

All abandonment work shall be performed in accordance with the provisions of Chapters NR 111, NR 112 or NR 141 , Wis. Admin. Code, whichever is applicable. Also, see instructions on back.

1!1_ ~ENER~J.._ INI'ORMATIUN (2) .FACILITY NAME

Well/Drillhole/Borehole I County Original Well Owner (lf Known)

Location ~vtf M1w..fW~£.. vVl5 coi\Jrlrv 0cLL mE Present Well Owner

~ 1/4 of t:frjj_ 1/4 of Sec . .2S ; T. ( N;R. ~I Ow ~ME.Q..\\ffrt-/ ~f3C (If applicable) Street or Route ,..... ........ s 1oc Co<-P tcC/11 L

Gov't Lot GridNwnber ~~ r:4• ~~ '- $;! . ~S;'tt~ ~A~1~'~_rV, <1 Grid Location City, State, Zip Code &a> C.

ft. 0 N. 0 s .. ft. DE: 0 W. 1-.1\tc..._WA.ut:::..'C'C.. , .......t I S3u~ Civil Town Name ractllty Well No. and/or Name tU AppllcaOleJ 'Wl Uruque Well No.

m/LWJJu~c£ MW-3 . . Str~tA~~sofWell . Reason for Abandonment

8qs s . 35m Sr S 1 n:. CLem) !LE:-

City, V~ V</J: 5~ ;L/"1::>

Date of Abandonment Dt ,t:/L ~DI / {W IJ L.l Kf:£. •

WELL/DRILLHOLE/BOREHOLE INFORMATION w Original Well/Drillhole/Borehole Construction Completed On (4) Depth to Water (F~t)

(Date) Pump & Piping Removed? 0 Yes 0N>[8) Not Applicable

Liner(s) Removed? 0 Yes 0 N> 18] Not Applicable

tt;J Monitoring Well Construction Report Available? Screen Removed? 0 Yes ~:u Not Applicable

0 WaterWell DYes ON> Casing Left in Place? ~ Yes

0 Drillhole If No. Explain

0 Borehole Was Casing Cut Off Below Surface? Ga Yes ON>

Construction Type: Did Sealing Material Rise to Surface? ~Yes 0 N> ~ Drilled 0 Driven (Sandpoint) 0 Dug Did Material Settle After 24 Hours? 0 Yes [E) Nl

0 Other (Specify) If Yes, Was Hole Retopped? O Yes O Nl


[!J Ghii411 1£r Pipe-Gravity D Conductor Pipe-Pumped . gj Unconsolidated Formation 0 Bedrock 0 Dwnp Bailer 0 Other (Explain)

Total Well Depth W) \q ''1: Casing Diameter (ins.) Z... (6) Sealing Materials For monitoring wells and

(From groundsurface) 0 Neat Cement Grout monitoring well boreholes only

0 Sand-Cement (Con~ete) Grout

Casing Depth (ft.) 1\..-{ 0 Concrete I 0 Bentonite Pellets I 0 Clay-Sand Slurry I 0 Granular Bentonite

Was Well Annular Space Grou~? 0 Yes ON> 0 Unknown 0 Bef\tonite-Sa.nd Slur.y I

D Bentonite - Cement 0rout I

lfY~. To What Depth? F~t f8) Chipped Bentonite I

(1) Sealing Material Used

No. :r:ar~ Mix Ratio or Mud Weight From (Ft.) To (Ft.) Sacks Sealant

orVolwne

CH1Wf.D fft{'lo41'1E-Surface fl .tt ---~"ft-

tS mr

jcl Illingworth CORPORATION

TN & Associates 1031 North Mayfair Road, Suite 200 Milwaukee, WI 53226

Attn: Jim Kasdorf

MECHANICAL SERVICES

Subject: Tank Removal Documentation

December 4, 2000

As requested I have enclosed the documentation on a 6000-gallon tank removed from 845 North 35th Street in 1992.

Please let me know if anything else is required .

Sincerely, ILLINGWORTH CORPORATION

-....-..n;·,..__, .. ~~ ohn C. Illingworth

President

JCI/bb

Enclosures

615 South 89th Street • P.O. Box 314 • Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53201 • Phone: 414-476-5790 • Fax: 414-476-0916

/.- . :~W~?:····

)L :_TANK SERVICE OF WI, 1~6~ / 1813 South 73rd Street

A; WEST ALLIS, WI 53214 _! . ~~'

(QJ~[Q)~~ NQ 3396

... - .,.,. (414) 257-0030 PHONE DATE OF ORDER

ORDER TAKEN BY CUSTOMER'S ORDER NUMBER

c .D Re.-J ~

12!:j'DAYWORK 0 CONTRACT 0 EXTRA JOB NAME/NUMBER

(Uj :)c. 0.0 ... /~ l!:wcL JOB~TION ~; .,ttJetL~ - Jv( ,.'.L.uJ c-J/':>e..

TERMS:

JOB PHONE gTARTING DATE

- 5--CJ Z,

TOTAL LABOR

TOTAL MATERIALS TOTAL MATERIALS

TOTAL

Work ordered by _________________ _

TAX ~ ·ature ____________________ _

I hereby acknowledge the satisfactory completion of the above described work. J TOTAL

_(.

,griee ;et

tstination

AANDUM ,.t a biU of lading hos been Issued and Is not tho Original am of lAding, nor

JCrfng the property named her31n, and Is Intended solely for flUng or record.

Zip

ERG -!J27

E.PA !~dcr,t ~ ·J:· . VV j 0 ( ; )"S.:":?,Z-2C:S:J ar-4 :,~i1 o.J-L~ !\0~ 1 o£..;:.::is

Remit C.O.D. to:

Address:

City: State: Zip: NOTE - Where: the rate is dependent on value. shippers are required to state specrtically in writing the ·agreed or declared value of the property. The agreed or declared value of the property is

specifically stated by the shipper to be not exceeding $ Per

--

Shipper's No.

SCAC

FROM: Shipper Wise. Eell/Illing'"NOrth Co4 Street N. 35th & Wells Origin Mil~.. Zip

,..gnee :~at

.estination

)iAN DUM ,.t a biD of lading has been Issued and Is not !he Original em of Lading, nor

1;tring the property named herein, and II Intended solely for flUng or record.

~National Tank S€rv.

Zip

WATER

E.P..A.. ffidm:at Ho. W I D 0 "l2B228BO mdWiO.N.P .. No~ 1D~S

State: Zip: the rate is dependent on value. shippers are required to state specifically in writing

or declared value of the property. The agreed or declared value of the property is · stated by the shipper to be not exceeding $ Per

---

Shipper's No. -------------t::rc~

Carrier's No. SCAC

FROM: Shipper lolisc. Bell/llling-worlh Co. Street fl.,.35th & Wells St. Origin Uilv. Zip

' -'

.;iQnee ,eet

;estination

------

~•ORANDUM ,.ot a bm of lading has been issued and is not the Original sm of lading, nor

;ming the pro~ named herein, and is intended sole~ for fifing or record. _ . Jar.ase}";: Co.±

l'!ation.:'ll ':'a.Dk Se..:...""Vice of ~'!I,

1813 s. 73rd s~eet ~-;.est Idlis, 1iii ~Vl4

a.PN·1ED/IY.P'?I t tmk for

.• . ..... ·. ~ . ' --a • • • •• • ...# • · ~ ·

ibrt

Shipper 's No.

Carrier'

Wisconsin P.2ll/IllinrJI·XJrt.h 35th t. \·.ie lls ~-ti.hJ;.:n. ~)cE.-8 1 FI

$

Zip

\./

C.O.D. FEE: Prepaid 0 Collect 0

0 YES :5t NO- RJRNISHED BY CARRIEI DRIVER SIGNATURE:

transportation

1. Generator's US EPA tD No.

3. Generator's Name and Mailing Address

At1ERI.T.t.Cll 845 N. 35th St., Milwaukee, WI

4. Generator's Phone ( )

5 .

7.

9 . Designated Facility Name and Site Address

AM ENVIRt.U£NrAL ~'TRIES, rnc. 3240 W. Elm Rd.

11 . Waste Shipping Name and Description

a.

d.

10.

Manifest Doc. No. 2. Page 1

of

A . Transporter' s Phone

B. Transporter's Phone

US EPA ID Number C Faci lity's Phone

_. , .·

D. Additional Descript ions for Material s Listed Above E. Handling Codes for Wastes Listed Above

15. Special Handling Instructions and Additional Information

. _;

Signature

19. Discrepancy Indication Space

20. Facility Owner or Operator: Certification of receipt of waste materials covered by this manifest except as noted in Item 19.

Printed/Typed Name Signature

GENERATOR'S COPY · '·

WORK ORDER

~ :- :: .j ,,.

ENVIRONMENTAL INDUSTRIES, INC.

8-4 "'• t\i ';St ;.. St·eet ·----·-·--·---- ·--·

'/ f asi.e Prdile

End Time: '\ ' i (:; __ :L_ __ _

SiC Co.j E:

3240 West Elm Road • Franklin, WI 53132 (414) 761-9421 • FAX (414) 761-9542

s ;te Contad .iim Ka.5d -.:' if -----·-

fJi sposal .Site

?13> . L~,_ ____ _

Quantity Generate ~- f-\ Un •:s ~""-+---------- ___ .:,;.e...;..~----

J Sta;t Time :Jn-Site 5<. , j_Q _____ _

End Time On-Site . G · C! ( , -~..>L.,._,..I,i...:;·_· ---

'he above d6scnbed work has bden performed ~;vith my/our authorization and satisfach:m. The terms of payment are i'!et 30 days unless otheruise pre\!iO'..lSiy agreed to in writing . Any unpaid balance which exceeds 30 days will be assessed a finance charge of 1.5% (18°/()l APR) ;dntil ~id in fui!

. ..... -- ··- .... , /! / . /~ · .. · / ; .·· : .. . ! .~. . / ; 7_.,-;_.' .

I~ Authorized By Initials: al <t. .

.. . .

Date: 11/22/00 Requestor: Kendra Kennell

Recommended Vendor: AAA Environmental Industries

Requisition #: ---------------------------Proj. No.: ....;2..;..00.;..;0;...;;0...;;..0.;..7 ---------Task No.: 0004

~~~~~~~----Proj. Name: Ameritech 35th Street

Street 3240 West Elm Road Ship To: Subcontractor will be on-site pending scheduling City, State, Zip Phone Number: Fax Number: Point of Contact:

Franklin, WI 53132 414-761-9421 414-761-9542 Alen Luttinen

Have other sources been contacted for quotes? YES if YES, list potential sources; if NO, explain justification: Advanced Waste National Tank Service

Required Delivery Date: To be determined

::::l~ri(NQ:j:f: ::::::::::::::::f:::::::::::::P~i@pliQ~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::. :::::::::QW::::::::: ::::::::::~~~::::::::: ::::~~t:c.o~:::: .::::::::::e>cWnct~~=CQ~~::::::!:i: 1 Transportation and disposal of 1 Jump sum $180.25 $180.25

one 55 gallon drum of non-hazadous liquid waste derived from. groundwater.

Sales Tax Shipping Cost

Total $180.25

Project Chargeable (direct): Requested by/Date

~ ~\IJd()fOO Q,(\Q..rQ,

Project Mgr. Cost Center Mgr. Approval/Date

-+l""p~u"""rc-4lh .... a~oo~,s~E ltk/;o; n 00

All purchases

Controller Approval/Date

If> $25,000

Non-chargeable (Indirect): Requested by/Date Cost Center Controller Approval/Date COO Approval/Date

All purchases All purchase If> $1 ,000 If> $10,000

STATEMENT OF CORRECTNESS OF ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS

Ameritech Wisconsin Bell Facility 845 N 35th Street,

Milwaukee, WI 53280 Closure Request and GIS Registration Commerce PECFA#: 53280-0001-45

DNR BRRTS#: 03-41-002600

I, Lori Skrezyna, state that I believe the legal descriptions in the deed copies for tax parcel number 387-0736-100-7, copies of which are attached, are complete and accurate, and that they correspond to the contaminated properties referenced in the closure request and the GIS registration.

Lori Skrezyna for SBC

Checklist of Documents for GIS Registry Packet PUB-RR-688 June, 2004

(Include with closure request- please assemble in this order. This checklist applies to closure requests for sites with groundwater exceeding ch. NR 140 standards and/or soil contamination exceeding ch. NR 720 generic or site specific residual contaminant levels (RCLs).)

• One-time fee of $250.00 for groundwater, and/or $200 for soil, for each case closed, for maintenance of the registry.

• Copies of the most recent deed including legal descriptions, for all properties within or partially within the contaminated site boundaries. (Note: If a property has been purchased with a land contract and the purchaser has not yet received a deed, a copy of the land contract which includes the legal description shall be submitted instead of the most recent deed. If the property has been inherited. written documentation of the property transfer should be submitted along with the most recent deed.)

N A 0 A copy of the certified surveyed map or the relevant section of the recorded plat map for those properties where the legal description in the most recent deed refers to a certified survey map or a recorded plat map. (lots on subdivided or platted property (e.g. lot 2 ofxyz subdivision))

• Parcel identification number for each property, i[the county in which the property is located uses parcel identification numbers.

• Geographic position of all properties within or partially within the contaminated site boundaries. The coordinates need to be for a spot located at least 40 feet inside the property boundary. Refer to NR 716.15(2)(d)7, and (k). The coordinates must be in WTM91 projection. See the following WDNR website address for assistance:http://gomappout.dnr.state.wi.uslorglatletlgeolgwurlindex.htm

• A location map which outlines all properties within the contaminated site boundaries on a U.S.G.S. topographic map or plat map in sufficient detail to permit the easy location of all parcels. If groundwater standards are exceeded, the map must also include the location of all municipal and potable wells within 1200 feet of the site.afonly one parcel, combine with next item.)

• A map of all contaminated properties within site boundaries, showing buildings, roads, property boundaries, contaminant sources, utility lines, monitoring wells and potable wells. This map shall also show the location of all contaminated public streets, and highway and railroad rights-of-way in relation to the source property and in relation to the boundaries of groundwater contamination exceeding ch. NR 140 enforcement standards, and/or in relation to the boundaries of soil contamination exceeding generic or site-specific residual contaminant levels as determined under s .. NR 720.09, 720.11 and 720.19.

• A table of the most recent analytical results, with sample collection dates: from all monitoring wells, and any potable wells for which samples have been collected for groundwater, and/or showing results for all contaminants found in pre-remedial sampling and in the most recent soil sampling event, for soils (without shading/crosshatching).

Wisconsin Department ofNatural Resources P.O. Box 7921 , Madison, WI 53707

http://dnr.wi.gov/org/aw/rr

• An isoconcentration map, if required as part of the site investigation (SI), of the contaminated properties within the site boundaries. The map should include the areal extent of groundwater contamination exceeding PALs and ESs, groundwater flow directions based on the most recent data, and sample collection dates. If an isoconcentration map was not required as part of the SI, substitute a map showing the horizontal extent of contamination, based on the most recent data.

• A table of the previous 4 water level elevation measurements from all monitoring wells, at a minimum, with the date measurements were made, is to be included. If present, free product is to be noted on the table. In addition, a groundwater flow direction map, representative of groundwater movement at the site. If the flow direction varies by more than 20° over the history of the site, 2 groundwater flow maps showing the maximum variation in flow direction are to be submitted

• For sites closing with residual soil contamination, include a map showing the location of all soil samples and a single contour showing the horizontal extent of each area of contiguous residual soil contamination that exceeds generic or site specific residual contaminant levels.

• A geologic cross section, if required as part of the SI, showing vertical extent and location of residual soil contamination exceeding generic or site specific RCLs and residual groundwater contamination, source extent and location; isoconcentrations for all groundwater contaminants that exceed PALs that remain when closure is requested; water table and piezometric elevations, and the location and elevation of geologic units, bedrock, and confining units, if any.

• A statement signed by the responsible party, which states that he or she believes that the legal descriptions attached to the statement are complete and accurate. (I'he point here is that the legal descriptions are describing the correct (i.e. contaminated) properties.)

N ..4 0 A copy of the letters sent by the RP to all owners of properties with groundwater exceeding ESs as required by s. NR 726.05(3)(a)4.g. Letters sent to off-source properties must contain standard provisions in Appendix A of ch. NR 726. (Off source properties are listed separately with a link to the source property.) If the source property owner is owned by someone other than the person who is applying for case closure, a copy of the letter notifying the current owner of the source property that case closure has been requested should also be included.

N A- 0 A copy of all written notifications provided (to city/village/municipality/state agency or other responsible for maintenance) of a public street or highway or railroad right-ofway, within or partially within the boundaries of the contaminated site, for contamination exceeding groundwater ESs and/or soil exceeding generic or site specific RCLs.

N ~ 0 A list of addresses for all off-source properties affected by residual soil or groundwater contamination exceeding applicable standards.

Printed on Recycled

Paper

This document contains information about certain state statutes and administrative rules but does not necessarily include all of the details found in the statutes and rules. Readers should consult the actual language of the statutes and rules to answer specific questions.

2

Checklist of Documents for GIS Registry Packet PUB-RR-688 June,2004



• Copies of the most recent deed including legal descriptions, for all properties within or partially within the contaminated site boundaries. (Note: If a property has been purchased with a land contract and the purchaser has not yet received a deed, a copy of the land contract which includes the legal description shall be submitted instead of the most recent deed. If the property has been inherited, written documentation of the property transfer should be submitted along with the most recent deed.)

N A D A copy of the certified surveyed map or the relevant section of the recorded plat map for those properties where the legal description in the most recent deed refers to a certified survey map or a recorded plat map. (lots on subdivided or platted property (e.g. lot 2 ofxyz subdivision))

• Parcel identification number for each property, i[the county in which the property is located uses parcel identification numbers.

• Geographic position of all properties within or partially within the contaminated site boundaries. The coordinates need to be for a spot located at least 40 feet inside the property boundary. RefertoNR 716.15(2)(d)7, and(k). Thecoordinatesmustbein WTM91 projection. See the following WDNR website address for assistance:http://gomappout.dnr.state.wi.us/org/at/et/geolgwur/index.htm

• A location map which outlines all properties within the contaminated site boundaries on a U.S.G.S. topographic map or plat map in sufficient detail to permit the easy location of all parcels. If groundwater standards are exceeded, the map must also include the location of all municipal and potable wells within 1200 feet of the site.Ofonly one parcel. combine with next item.)

• A map of all contaminated properties within site boundaries, showing buildings, roads, property boundaries, contaminant sources, utility lines, monitoring wells and potable wells. This map shall also show the location of all contaminated public streets, and highway and railroad rights-of-way in relation to the source property and in relation to the boundaries of groundwater contamination exceeding ch. NR 140 enforcement standards, and/or in relation to the boundaries of soil contamination exceeding generic or site-specific residual contaminant levels as determined under s .. NR 720.09,720.11 and 720.19.


Wisconsin Department ofNatural Resources P.O. Box 7921 , Madison, WI 53707


• An isoconcentration map, if required as part of the site investigation (Sl), of the contaminated properties within the site boundaries. The map should include the areal extent of groundwater contamination exceeding PALs and ESs, groundwater flow directions based on the most recent data, and sample collection dates. If an isoconcentration map was not required as part of the SI, substitute a map showing the horizontal extent of contamination, based on the most recent data.




• A statement signed by the responsible party, which states that he or she believes that the legal descriptions attached to the statement are complete and accurate. (The point here is that the legal descriptions are describing the correct (i.e. contaminated) properties.)

N ..4 0 A copy of the letters sent by the RP to all owners of properties with groundwater exceeding ESs as required by s. NR 726.05(3)(a)4.g. Letters sent to off-source properties must contain standard provisions in Appendix A of ch. NR 726. (Off source properties are listed separately with a link to the source property.) If the source property owner is owned by someone other than the person who is applying for case closure, a copy of the letter notifying the current owner of the source property that case closure has been requested should also be included.

N A- 0 A copy of all written notifications provided (to city/village/municipality/state agency or other responsible for maintenance) of a public street or highway or railroad right-ofway, within or partially within the boundaries of the contaminated site, for contamination exceeding groundwater ESs and/or soil exceeding generic or site specific RCLs.

N .A- 0 A list of addresses for all off-source properties affected by residual soil or groundwater contamination exceeding applicable standards.

Printed on Recycled

Paper


2

Checklist of Documents for GIS Registry Packet PUB-RR-688 June, 2004



• Copies of the most recent deed including legal descriptions, for all properties within or partially within the contaminated site boundaries. (Note: If a property has been purchased with a land contract and the purchaser has not yet received a deed, a copy of the land contract which includes the legal description shall be submitted instead of the most recent deed. If the property has been inherited, written documentation of the property transfer should be submitted along with the most recent deed.)

N A 0 A copy of the certified surveyed map or the relevant section of the recorded plat map for those properties where the legal description in the most recent deed refers to a certified survey map or a recorded plat map. (lots on subdivided or platted property (e.g. lot 2 ofxyz subdivision))

• Parcel identification number for each property, i(the county in which the property is located uses parcel identification numbers.

• Geographic position of all properties within or partially within the contaminated site boundaries. The coordinates need to be for a spot located at least 40 feet inside the property boundary. RefertoNR 716.15(2)(d)7, and(k). Thecoordinatesmustbein WI'M91 projection. See the following WDNR website address for assistance: http :1 /gomappout.dnr.state. wi. us/ org/ at/et/ geo/ gwur/index.htm

• A location map which outlines all properties within the contaminated site boundaries on a U.S.G.S. topographic map or platmap in sufficient detail to permit the easy location of all parcels. If groundwater standards are exceeded, the map must also include the location of all municipal and potable wells within 1200 feet of the site.(I(only one parcel, combine with next item.)

• A map of all contaminated properties within site boundaries, showing buildings, roads, property boundaries, contaminant sources, utility lines, monitoring wells and potable wells. This map shall also show the location of all contaminated public streets, and highway and railroad rights-of-way in relation to the source property and in relation to the boundaries of groundwater contamination exceeding ch. NR 140 enforcement standards, and/or in relation to the boundaries of soil contamination exceeding generic or site-specific residual contaminant levels as determined under s .. NR 720.09, 720.11 and 720.19.


Wisconsin Department ofNatural Resources P.O. Box 7921, Madison, WI 53707


• An isoconcentration map, if required as part of the site investigation (SI), of the contaminated properties within the site boundaries. The map should include the areal extent of groundwater contamination exceeding PALs and ESs, groundwater flow directions based on the most recent data, and sample collection dates. If an isoconcentration map was not required as part of the SI, substitute a map showing the horizontal extent of contamination, based on the most recent data.




• A statement signed by the responsible party, which states that he or she believes that the legal descriptions attached to the statement are complete and accurate. (l'he point here is that the legal descriptions are describing the correct (i.e. contaminated) properties.)

N A- 0 A copy of the letters sent by the RP to all owners of properties with groundwater exceeding ESs as required by s. NR 726.05(3)(a)4.g. Letters sent to off-source properties must contain standard provisions in Appendix A of ch. NR 726. (Off source properties are listed separately with a link to the source property.) If the source property owner is owned by someone other than the person who is applying for case closure, a copy of the letter notifying the current owner of the source property that case closure has been requested should also be included.

N Jl- 0 A copy of all written notifications provided (to city/village/municipality/state agency or other responsible for maintenance) of a public street or highway or railroad right-ofway, within or partially within the boundaries of the contaminated site, for contamination exceeding groundwater ESs and/or soil exceeding generic or site specific RCLs.

N ~ 0 A list of addresses for all off-source properties affected by residual soil or groundwater contamination exceeding applicable standards.

Printed on Recycled

Paper


2

GEOGRAPHIC POSITION

Ameritech Wisconsin Bell Facility 845 N 35th Street Milwaukee, WI 53280

Commerce #: 53280-0001-45 DNR #: 03-41-002600

Geographic Position: 686356, 287280

STATEMENT OF CORRECTNESS OF ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS

Ameritech Wisconsin Bell Facility 845 N 35th Street,

Milwaukee, WI 53280 Closure Request and GIS Registration Commerce PECFA#: 53280-0001-45

DNR BRRTS#: 03-41-002600

I, Lori Skrezyna, state that I believe the legal descriptions in the deed copies for tax parcel number 387-0736-100-7, copies of which are attached, are complete and accurate, and that they correspond to the contaminated properties referenced in the closure request and the GIS registration.

Lori Skrezyna for SBC

PARCEL NUMBER


Commerce #: 53280-0001-45 DNR #: 03-41-002600

Parcel (Tax Key) Number: 387-0736-100-7

GEOGRAPHIC POSITION


Commerce#: 53280-0001-45 DNR #: 03-41-002600


* MN

GN f \

I' 0'38' Is MILS

"iTMiLS

u QUADRANGLE LOCATION


• Er19lneerlno and Science

AMERITECH FACILITY 845 N. 35TH STREET MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN

Figure 1 SITE LOCATION MAP

Kilbourn Avenue

Sidewalk \ I Sidewalk IU u c: E ......, c:

u..J ... ~Entrance ...

8~5 N. 35th Sl Entrance :

~ c :.: <U

"'0 u=; I ~ I J. tn~ance I

Loading -Dock . CJ Gate ?· • v Parking

Previrusly Existing ~ Lot 6,(XX)-galloo Fiberglass UST u....

' I I Parl<ing Lot • • = ._

0 0 :.: 0 Q) c::l

-o . v;

Loading Entrance: Dock

Gate ~

801 N. 35th Sl

I I I~ --·-

Sidewalk r-~ Sidewalk

~ ~ Wells Street

- GJ

Sidewalk Q)

Sidewalk __, ........ 0 0

-f- (.!) <..!>

-...!11:: 0

0 ....J IU c:n :.: c:n E Parking Lot Q) c:

-c ~ 1:.n 0 c...

0 (.,!)

GENERAL SITE PLAN Not to Scale

I--

1-

= 0 3: Q.)

-o 1:.n

= 0 3:: Q.)

-o u=;

1-

1-

..::..:: c 3: Q)

-o v;

vU I IU

Milw. 801 Adm. 801 N. 35th Street

C01 12 Milw. 845 Adm .

845 N. 35th Street

C015.3 Milw. Wells Parking Lot

3601/15 W. Wells Street

Table 1 Summary of Groundwater Analytical Results

May 17,2000 35th St. Ameritech

Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Sample ID MW-1 MW-2

Sample collection date 5117/2000 5/17/2000 DRO (ug/1) <100 <100 Petroleum Volatile Organic Compounds (ug!L) Benzene <0.27 <0.27 Ethylbenzene <0.32 <0.32 Methyl-tert-butyl-ether <0.32 <0.32 Toluene <0.27 <0.27 1 ,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <0.27 <0.27 1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <0.22 <0.22 Xylenes, -m,-p, -o <0.67 <0.67 Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (ug!L) Acenaphthene <0.47 <0.47 Acenaphthylene <0.41 <0.41 Anthracene <0.021 <0.021 Benzo( a)anthracene 0.066 0.13 Benzo( a)pyrene 0.15 0.22 Benzo(b )fluoranthene 0.11 0.17 Benzo(g,h,l)perylene 0.1 0.15 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.05 0.083 Chrysene 0.077 0.15 Dibenzo( a,h)anthracene 0.032 0.060 Fluoranthene 0.15 0.35 Fluorene <0.058 <0.058 Ideno(l ,2,3-cd)pyrene 0.3 0.33 1-Methylnaphthalene <0.36 <0.36 2-Methylnaphthalene <0.36 <0.36 Naphthalene <0.42 <0.42 Phenanthrene <0.046 0.14 Pyrene 0.15 0.30

ugll -micrograms per liter (equivalent to parts per billion [ppb]) NS- no standards established (Wisconsin Administrative Code, NR140) BOLD - indicates exceedance of NR 140 PAL NA -Not Analyzed

MW-3

5117/2000 <100

<0.27 <0.32 <0.32 <0.27 <0.27 <0.22 <0.67

<0.47 <0.41

<0.021 0.073 0.15

0.099 0.11

0.047 0.092

<0.020 0.24

<0.058 0.19

<0.36 <0.36 <0.42 0.083 0.20

NR140 NR140 Enforcement Preventive

Standard Action Level

--- ---NS NS

5.0 0.5 700 140 60 12 343 69 NS NS NS NS 620 124

NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 0.2 0.02 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 400 80 NS NS NS NS NS NS 40 8 NS NS NS NS

SampleiD S-1

Sample date 8/5/1992 Sample Location North Wall Sample depth (feet) 8 PID Reading (IUs) 3 DRO (mg/kg) 87.8

Table 1 UST Removal Soil Analytical Results

August 5, 1992 Ameritech Property 845 North 35th Street


S-2 S-3 S-4

8/5/1992 8/5/1992 8/5/1992 West Wall South Wall East Wall

9 8 8 2 1 1

123 107 125

mg/kg- milligrams per kilogram (equivalent to parts per million [ppm])

S-5

8/5/1992 West Pipe Run

3 ND 14.3

100/250- NR720 soil standards for predominantly sandy soils are 100 mg/kg, and for predominantly clayey soils are 250 mg/kg. BOLD - indicates exceedance of RCLs IUs - PID Instrument Units

S-6 NR720Soil Cleanup Standard

8/5/1992 ---East Pipe Run ---

2 ---ND 18.8 1001250*

Sample ID B-1 B-1

Sample date 9/16/1992 9/16/1992 Sample depth (feet) 6.5-8.5 13-15 PID Reading (IUs) ND ND

DRO(mglkg) <10 <10 Petroleum Volatile Organic Compounds

Methyl-tert-butyl-ether ND ND Benzene ND ND Toluene ND ND Ethyl benzene ND ND Xylenes, -m,-p, -o ND ND 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND ND 1,3 .5-Trimethylbenzene ND ND PAH (TPH- Extractable) (uglkg)

Acenaphthene <1.67 <1.67 Acenaphthylene <3.33 <3.33 Anthracene <0.17 <0.17 Benzo(a)anthracene 66 <0.17 Benzo(a)pyrene 74 <0.17 Benzo(b )fluoranthene 67 <0.33 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene <0.33 <0.33 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 58 <0.17 Chrysene 97 <0.17 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene <0.33 <0.33 Auoranthene 250 <0.33 Auorene <0.33 <0.33 lndeno(l,2.3-i:d)pyrene <0.17 <0.17 1-Methylnaphthalene NA NA 2-Methylnaphthalene NA NA Naphthalene <1.67 <1.67 Phenanthrene 183 <0.17 Pyrene 229 <0.17

mglkg- milligrams per kilogram (equivalent to parts per million [ppm]) uglkg- micrograms per kilogram (equivalent to parts per billion [ppb])

Table2 Historical SoU Analytical Results

September 16-17, 1992 Ameritect Property 845 North 35th Street


B-2 B-2 B-3

9/16/1992 9/16/1992 9/16/1992 7-9 11-13 9-11 <I ND <I

<10 I <10 <10

ND ND ND ND ND ND 2 3 ND

ND 4 ND ND 11 ND ND 3 ND ND II ND

<1.67 <1.67 <1.67 <3.33 <3.33 <3.33 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17 53 <0.17 <0.17 29 <0.33 <0.33 3.4 <0.33 <0.33 <0.33 <0.17 <0.17 4.4 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17 <0.33 <0.33 <0.33 <0.33 <0.33 103 <0.33 <0.33 <0.33 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17 NA NA NA NA NA NA

<1.67 <1.67 <1.67 <0.17 <0.17 78 <0.17 <0.17 116

100/250- NR720 soil standards for predominantly sandy soils are 100 mglkg, and for predominantly clayey soils are 250 mglkg. RCLs - NR 720 residual contaminant levels or guideline RCLs as per WDNR interim guidance on P AHs NA - Not analyzed BOLD - indicates exceedance of RCL IUs - PID Instrument Units

B-3 B-4 B-4 NR720 Soil Cleanup RCLs or Guideline

RCLs

9/16/1992 9117/1992 9117/1992 13-15 13-15 23-25 -ND I ND

NR720RCLs

<10 <10 <10 1001250*

ND ND ND NS ND ND ND 5.5 ND ND ND 1.500 ND ND ND 2,900 ND ND ND 4,100 ND ND ND NS ND ND NO NS

Guideline RCLs <1.67 <1 .67 640 900,000 <3.33 <3.33 <3.33 18,000 <0.17 <0.17 250 5,000,000 <0.17 43 130 88 <0.17 30 230 8.8 <0.33 <0.33 160 88 <0.33 <0.33 <0.33 1,800 <0.17 <0.17 170 880 <0.17 17 <0.17 8,800 <0.33 <0.33 <0.33 8.8 <0.33 85 510 6,000,000 <0.33 <0.33 170 600,000 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17 88 NA NA NA 1,100,000 NA NA NA 600,000

<1.67 <1.67 42 20,000 <0.17 41 680 18,000 <0.17 73 410 500,000

LEGEND

MW-1

BENCH MARK ELEV. a 100.00 [: 690.0 MSL IESTIMATED>l

MW-3

Sample Collection Date 2/15/2000 5/17/2000

Contaminant 11gll ORO <100 130

Benzopyrene 0.15

9r t

""'" SOIL BORING/MONITORING \.v'ELL LOCATION A ANALYTICAL SAMPLE LOCATION

1J.9II MICROGRAMS PER LITER DRO DIESEL RANGE ORGANICS N/A NOT ANALYZED ~ UNDERLINED CDNCENTRA TIONS EXCEED THE

PREVANTA TIVE ACTION LIMIT 0.26 BOLD CONCENTRATIONS EXCEED THE

ENFORCEMENT STANDARD

T N & Associates. Inc.

' EnQineerln9 ond Science

~~· .,.....,.. • ..-' '""••o,200000't'-•f""•t•eoton.don

AMERITECH FACILITY 845 N. 35TH STREET MILWAUKEE. WISCONSIN

S-5

I I I

S-2~

EXISTING AMERITECH BUILDING 18415 NORTH 35TH STREET!

CONCRETE SIDEWALK

S-6

/ S-1

-~-------:6.---

000

FORMER REMOTE Fn..L & VENT

I I I I I I

~-41

I FORMER UST LOCATION I

N

ESTIMATED EXTENT OF CONTAMINATED SOILS ABOVE lOOppM AS DRD

ESTIMATED EXTENT OF \/GROUND ~ATER

ENFORCEMENT STANDARD EXCEEDANCE

I I I I I I I S-J I ~-----------lfi..-----------I I

8·3/t.IW-3

GROUND'w' A TER FLO'w'

i -

ESTit.IATED EXTENT OF MW-2

~:~~"':~~T;gmso~~%Ro Sample Collection Date 2/15/2000 5/17/2000

/ / Contaminant 11gll

.....- ORO <100 <100 Benzopyrene 0.22 0.26

SCALE: r = 10'

Monitoring \../ell Ano.lytico.l Results

10

Groundwater Elevations Ameritech Facility - 35th st.

Monitoring Well 10/16/92 Elevation 8/22/94 Elevation 4111195 Elevation 8/25/95 Elevation MW-1 DRY 674.52 674.31 674.16 MW-2 674.25 674.69 674.83 674.71 MW-3 674.35 674.91 675.08 674.90

EXISTING AMERITECH BUILDING 18<115 NORTH 35TH STREET!

~------------~A,r-----------~.---------------------------------------------

CONCRETE SIDEWALK

A ' ~~ ~TRY ~--------------_J\V~----------~!-f~~~----~~----------~rr--------------------~------

---- I I _J:J.!MW~ FORMER REMOTE F~L & VENT

FORMER SUPPLY & RETURN LINES -..:::J___ . i F!' V - - v --------'- 674.15 -v---~ :. I S-6 1 .: .·, 1 (674.16) . I p •

----~ I ----s:t-·-1-- --BENCH MARK I . ~-- -- ----:6:-1-- --- -ELEV. s 100.00 I I

APPROXIMATE EXCAVATION

LII.IITS~/5/9~ _;:~_Q 7 4.30

[: 690.0 MSL IESTitoiATEDll 1 /1\ I

------~'- ----...LI _ _t_l -- 1-- f- I -~ / --~-------- 674.45 A I I I ---

v. I S-21 l.s-<11 B-.c l • 0 b 0 I ) • ~ v

----~--L--1--~~~~ -f I 674~ I I --+---r------·~-~

I I I I I I I S-3 I ~------- --~----------' 1 II\

8·2/MW-2

0 (674.71)

-<JrT-----+-- -+----==---9==-==-==-=r=--ooe:::--:::::_ 6 7 4 75 v I -----~-

1 I I

t- I

-------L-1~-1 > I --

1 ~ I I ;; I I 5 I

ESTII.IA T£0 EXTENT OF

1 CONT AMINA TEO SOILS ABOVE 100 ppm AS ORO ISTS. 19921 0 _______ _Q74 .2_

6·3/MW-3 (6 7 4 .9)

N

l

SOIL BORING/MONITORING WELL LOCATION I "" I I .... I I ~ I

ANALYTICAL SAMPLE LOCATION I ~ I I u I I I

10---·0--~~~10

iii!JT N & Aaaoclatea, Inc.

~ Enolneerlno and Science

,1\.l. HA ... t ..,,,ue•o,I'OOOOO'f,ID""e,..at 'f'-ct'On.CIIOf'\


SCALE: r : 10'

Monitoring \Jell Groundwo. ter Contour 8/25/1995

I""

, .... -ma, _ _..

,_.. 2

B-1

SaJ11)le Depth (ft) 6.5-8.5 13-15 Contaminant ppm

EXISTING AIAERITECH BUILDING 18-45 NORTH 35THI---D-R!-0---+--<-10 ....... ...,__<_1_0---IN

Berrzo(a)antbracene 66 <0.17

/

APPROXIMATE EXCAVATION

--- LIMITS 110/S/92>

I I I I I I

*

* S-4

< 0 . 17

S-6

Sample Depth (ft)

Contaminant DRO

~S--4 Sample Depth (ft) 8'

Contaminant ppm ORO 125

B-2/I.IW-2

l

2'

ppm 18.8

' s~;;?ftl 9:,':~2:::50~1 I' Benzo( a )anthracene 53 < 0 .17

Benzo(a)pyrene 29 < 0 . 17 1 e-3/MW- 3

ESTIMATED EXTENT OF CONTAI.IINA TED SOILS ABOVE 100 ppm AS ORO CSTS, 19921

B-2 Benzo(a)fiuoranthene 3.4 < 0.33 5 I .--------->.-------, 5 I S-3

~ I Sample Depth (ft)

~ 1 Contaminant ppm

S I ~-~D~~~0~-~~1~0_7~ I

SOIL BORING/MONITORING WELL LOCATION 8'

ANALYTICAL SAMPLE LOCATION

Sample Depth (ft) 7 .0-9.0 11.0-13.0

Contaminant ppm ORO < 10 < 10

Benzo( a )anthracene < 0 .17 < 0 .17

Benzo( a )pyrene < 0 .17 < 0.17

Benzo( a )fiuoranthene < 0 .33 <0.33

• CPI I~ i'i"}!] T N & Associates, Inc.

~ Engl neerl ng and Science


Soil Sa.r~ple Ana.lytica.l Results

, .... -~~ .. --fiiUT 2

~M.C HA .. t t-t,ua'to,I'OOOOO'?'-om•.-•t•ectiOf"''. ctOn

B-4 B-1 B-3 B-2 o.-----------.--,,-----------------.-.----.~~,---------------.-.. --.-------~r--.----------~o

~--1---------

lOr-

FEET BELD\t/ SURFACE

15 r--

20-

25-

ii1J T N & Associates. Inc.

~Enolneerlno and Science

:--

1-- TANK EXCAVATION <DEPTH OF BASE a,.:..-~1 ,---.....,_~ UNKNO\t/N) V I

MIXED FILL E I

1 I

I 1--

1--74 PAH

IJ S-1 :~DRO 87.8

-+--4--+-"""1

S-3 DRO 107 .4~

-

-30 SAND PAH

GRAV~--------------~+---------~/~

SILTY SAND -23 PAH -


--

29 PAH -

-- -

SILTY CLAY -<GRAY) r.===============~~

B-~ ~-r---~-H~~~~~~-

--.. --.....L I ~ " ~· - ·-1' .·"; . =· ~-::.. i" ~~- ... /,"\. -

------4 ·· ----- ...... 1 .. fill ' ! ~ i "t w ••• : i) ......

a-/ l ! -~-3 l ?-2

~\-------'"----+-! --!c:::::···- . ----~ ..... . .x;.:: __ i '...... ::..""':':."':t- ...... -

1 B-' lilll;;~.:-' CROSS SECTION - PLAN VIE\t/

-

GEOLOGIC CROSS-SECTION

flt\.C NAliCa ,_,,..., .... a,200000T,o-er-al1"e,c:tiOf""'. OGn

-5

-10

FEET BELD\t/ SURFACE

-15

-20

-25

,,_ 1

"" CPL , ... , .... --, .. ...

2

PARCEL NUMBER


Commerce #: 53280-0001-45 DNR #: 03-41-002600

Parcel (Tax Key) Number: 387-0736-100-7

GEOGRAPHIC POSITION


Commerce #: 53280-0001-45 DNR #: 03-41-002600


* MN

GN r \

I"

~ 1eMiLS 11 MILS

TI QUADRANGLE LOCATION

TN & Associates. Inc.

• Engineering end Science


Figure 1 SITE lOCATION MAP

..

...

~ Cl ~ v

"'0 v;

Gate

~ c ~ <t>

"'0 (/)

Gate

I I --

...:..:: 0 ~ <t>

"'0 V5

Kilbourn A venue

Sidewalk \ I Sidewalk . cu u c c .......

--' c L..L.J

~Entrance 8~5 N. 35th Sl

Entrance :

I ., I J.tn~a~ I

Loading lock /. • v Parking Previoosly Existing 5 Lot 6,<XX>-galloo Fiberglass usr LL..

\ I I Parking Lot ' ' ......

0 0

c::l . Loading Entrance:

Dock

~ 801 N. 35th Sl

Sidewalk

<t> __. Sidewalk c ~

-0 -..1

c:n c:: ~ c

0....

·-·-

I~ f-~

f- ~,-c p

Wells Street v __. 0

(..!)

cu c:n E Parking Lot c ~


Sidewalk

Sidewalk

f'

~

~ c ~ v

"'0 v;

~ c 3:: <t>

"'0 (/)

.... r---

...::..:. c ~ <t>

'"C v;

vV I IV

Milw. 801 Adm. 801 N. 35th Street

C0112 Milw. 845 Adm.

845 N. 35th Street

C015.3 Milw. Wells Parking Lot

3601 /1 5 W. Wells Street

Table 1 Summary of Groundwater Analytical Results

May 17,2000 35th St. Ameritech


Sample ID MW-1 MW-2

Sample collection date 5/17/2000 5117/2000 ORO (ug/1) <100 <100 Petroleum Volatile Organic Compounds (ug/L) Benzene <0.27 <0.27 Ethylbenzene <0.32 <0.32 Methyl-tert-butyl-ether <0.32 <0.32 Toluene <0.27 <0.27 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <0.27 <0.27 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <0.22 <0.22 Xylenes, -m,-p, -o <0.67 <0.67 Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (ug/L) Acenaphthene <0.47 <0.47 Acenaphthylene <0.41 <0.41 Anthracene <0.021 <0.021 Benzo( a)anthracene 0.066 0.13 Benzo(a)pyrene 0.15 0.22 Benzo(b )fluoranthene 0.11 0.17 Benzo(g,h,l)perylene 0.1 0.15 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.05 0.083 Chrysene 0.077 0.15 Dibenzo( a,h)anthracene 0.032 0.060 Fluoranthene 0.15 0.35 Fluorene <0.058 <0.058 Ideno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene 0.3 0.33 1-Methylnaphthalene <0.36 <0.36 2-Methylnaphthalene <0.36 <0.36 Naphthalene <0.42 <0.42 Phenanthrene <0.046 0.14 Pyrene 0.15 0.30

ug/1- micrograms per liter (equivalent to parts per billion [ppb]) NS- no standards established (Wisconsin Administrative Code, NR140) BOLD -indicates exceedance ofNR140 PAL NA- Not Analyzed

MW-3

5/17/2000 <100

<0.27 <0.32 <0.32 <0.27 <0.27 <0.22 <0.67

<0.47 <0.41

<0.021 0.073 0.15

0.099 0.11

0.047 0.092

<0.020 0.24

<0.058 0.19

<0.36 <0.36 <0.42 0.083 0.20

NR140 NR140 Enforcement Preventive


--- ---NS NS

5.0 0.5 700 140 60 12 343 69 NS NS NS NS 620 124

NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 0.2 0.02 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 400 80 NS NS NS NS NS NS 40 8 NS NS NS NS

SampleiD S-1

Sample date 8/5/1992 Sample Location North Wall Sample depth (feet) 8 PID Reading (IUs) 3 DRO (mglkg) 87.8




S-2 S-3 S-4

8/5/1992 8/5/1992 8/5/1992 West Wall South Wall East Wall

9 8 8

2 1 1 123 107 125

mglkg- milligrams per kilogram (equivalent to parts per million [ppm])

S-5

8/5/1992 West Pipe Run

3 ND 14.3

100/250- NR720 soil standards for predominantly sandy soils are 100 mglkg, and for predominantly clayey soils are 250 mglkg. BOLD - indicates exceedance of RCLs IUs- PID Instrument Units

S-6 NR720 Soil Cleanup Standard

8/5/1992 ---East Pipe Run ---

2 ---ND 18.8 1001250*

Sample ID B-1 B-1

Sample date 9/16/1992 9/16/1992

Sample depth (feet) 6.5-8.5 13-15 PID Reading (IUs) ND ND

DRO (mglkg) <10 I <10

Petroleum Volatile Organic Compounds

Methyl-tert-butyl-ether ND ND Benzene ND ND Toluene ND ND Ethyl benzene ND ND Xylenes, -m,-p, -o ND ND 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND ND 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND ND PAH (TPH- Extractable) (uglkg)

Acenaphthene <1.67 <1.67 Acenaphthylene <3.33 <3.33 Anthracene <0.17 <0.17

Benzo(a)anthracene 66 <0.17 Benzo(a)pyrene 74 <0.17 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 67 <0.33 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene <0.33 <0.33 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 58 <0.17 Chrysene 97 <0.17 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene <0.33 <0.33 Auoranthene 250 <0.33 Auorene <0.33 <0.33 lndeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene <0.17 <0.17 1-Methylnaphthalene NA NA 2-Methylnaphthalene NA NA Naphthalene <1.67 <1.67 Phenanthrene 183 <0.17 Pyrene 229 <0.17

mglkg- milligrams per kilogram (equivalent to parts per million [ppm]) uglkg- micrograms per kilogram (equivalent to parts per billion (ppb])

Table2 Historical Soil Analytical Results

September 16-17, 1992

Ameritect Property 845 North 35th Street


B-2 B-2 B-3

9/16/1992 9/16/1992 9116/1992 7-9 11-13 9-11

<1 ND <1

<10 <10 I <10 I

ND ND ND ND ND ND 2 3 ND

ND 4 ND ND II ND ND 3 ND ND II ND

<1.67 <1.67 <1.67 <3.33 <3.33 <3.33 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17

<0.17 <0.17 53 <0.17 <0.17 29

<0.33 <0.33 3.4

<0.33 <0.33 <0.33 <0.17 <0.17 4.4 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17 <0.33 <0.33 <0.33 <0.33 <0.33 103 <0.33 <0.33 <0.33 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17 NA NA NA

NA NA NA <1.67 < 1.67 <1.67 <0.17 <0.17 78 <0.17 <0.17 116

1001250- NR720 soil standards for predominantly sandy soils are 100 mglkg, and for predominantly clayey soils are 250 mglkg. RCLs - NR 720 residual contaminant levels or guideline RCLs as per WDNR interim guidance on P AHs NA- Not analyzed

BOLD - indicates exceedance of RCL IUs- PID Instrument Units

B-3 B-4 B-4 NR720 Soil Cleanup RCLs or Guideline

RCLs

9/16/1992 9/17/1992 9/1711992 -13-15 13-15 23-25 -ND 1 ND

NR720RCLs

<10 <10 <10 100/250•

ND ND ND NS

ND ND ND 5.5 ND ND ND 1,500 ND ND ND 2,900 ND ND ND 4,100 ND ND ND NS ND ND ND NS

Guideline RCLs

<1.67 <1.67 640 900,000 <3.33 <3.33 <3.33 18,000 <0.17 <0.17 250 5,000,000

<0.17 43 130 88 <0.17 30 230 8.8 <0.33 <0.33 160 88 <0.33 <0.33 <0.33 1,800 <0.17 <0.17 170 880 <0.17 17 <0.17 8,800 <0.33 <0.33 <0.33 8.8 <0.33 85 510 6,000,000 <0.33 <0.33 170 600,000 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17 88 NA NA NA 1,100,000 NA NA NA 600,000

<1.67 <1.67 42 20,000 <0.17 41 680 18,000 <0.17 73 410 500,000

LEGEND

MW-1

DRO Benzopyrene 0.15

BENCH MARK ELEV. = 100.00 [= 690.0 MSL IESTIMATEDll

MW-3 Sample Collection Date 2/15/2000 5117/2000

Contaminant J..Lg/1 DRO <100

Benzopyrene 0.15

~ SOIL BORING/MONITORING \JELL LOCATION A ANALYTICAL SAMPLE LOCATION

ILQ/1 MICROGRAMS PER LITER DRO DIESEL RANGE ORGANICS N/A NOT ANALYZED ~ UNDERLINED CDNCENTRA TIDNS EXCEED THE

PREVANT A TIVE ACTION LIMIT 0~6 BOLD CONCENTRATIONS EXCEED THE

ENFORCEMENT STANDARD

T N & Associates. Inc.

' Enoi neerl no ond Science

'~ll .., .. .,., ~•'v••o,ZOOOOOT'o"'•rat'f'eoolon.oon

AMERITECH FACILITY 845 N. 35TH STREET MIL WAUKEE I WISCONSIN

I I I

EXISTING AMERITECH BUILDING 18-15 NORTH 35TH STREET!

CONCRETE SIDEWALK

FORMER REMOTE F~L & VENT

S-6

-/ S-1

-~-------·--·-

N

ESTIMATED EXTENT OF CONTAMINATED SOILS ABOVE lOOppM AS DRO

ESTIMATED EXTENT OF \/GROUND ~ATER

ENFORCEMENT STANDARD EXCEEDANCE

S-2~ 000

I I I I I I

~--1

I I I

.... 5 "" > >.... ;:; .... ~ ... .... ~ ~ 0 u

FORMER UST LOCATION

I I I I I S-3 I ~----------~----------' I

B-3/MW-3

GRDUNDW'ATER FLOW'

i --

ESTIMATED EXTENT OF MW-2 CONTAMINATED SOILS . ABOVE 100 ppm AS/ORo Sample CollectiOn Date 2/15/2000 5/17/2000

/ / Contaminant J..Lg/1

......- DRO <100 <100 Benzopyrene 0.22 0.26

SCALE: 1" = 10'

Monitoring 'vJell Ano.lytico.l Results

Groundwater Elevations Ameritech Facility - 35th st.

Monitoring Well 10/16/92 Elevation 8/22/94 Elevation 4/11195 Elevation 8/25/95 Elevation MW-1 DRY 674.52 674.31 674.16 MW-2 674.25 674.69 674.83 674.71 MW-3 674.35 674.91 675.08 674.90

EXISTING AMERITECH BUILDING 18<45 NORTH 35TH STREET! N

--- ~--H+-+ FORMER SUPPLY & RETURN LINES I

--,r-r-----

I I I

I I I I

t- I ______ _L_3~ I > ~---

1 ::; I I ;; I I .... I

SOIL BORING/MONITORING WELL LOCATION I ::J I I ~ I I ~ I

ANALYTICAL SAMPLE LOCATION I ~ I


I 8 I I I


CONCRETE SIDEWALK

w~-V S-6

(6 7 4.16)

ESTIMA TEO EXTENT OF

-0-B-2/MW-2

(674.71)

1 CONTAMINATED SOILS ABOVE 100 ppm AS ORO CSTS, 1992> 0 - _______ _§74.2_

B-3/MW-3 (674.9)

10 0 5 10

~~~~~~ iiiiiiiiiiiiii1~~1 SCALE: r' = 10'

Monitoring \Jell Groundwa. ter Contour 8/25/1995

B-1

Sample Depth (ft) 6.5-8.5 13-15

S-1 Contaminant ppm

8, EXISTING AMERITECH BUILDING 18<15 NORTH 35TH ~--0-R:-0---+--<-1-0~...,_-<_1_0---IN .-------------J~,r-~s~~~~~eDe~p~fu~~~)+-~~r-----------------------~~~~~~--~--r-~~

Contaminant ppm Benw( a)antlnacene 66 <0.17

ORO 87.8 CONCRETE ~IDEWALK Benw(a)pyrene 74 <0.17 '\. Benzo(a)flooranthene 58 <0.33

~TRY r--------------J~1,----------r-4~'· ,--'-~------------~~~-------===========~======~----~ I ~ I B-1/MW-1 ~ 1.....-rFORt.IER REMOTE FILL & VENT

FORMER SUPPLY & S~~TURN LINES~ :: . ! ,., S-6~-r~t----~;;;;;;w;;-...r;=-----+-:::1<__,------::::--::--__j----,

Sample Depth (ft) 3' ; ; I ~~~:~~~~~E S-6

VBENCH MARKr--=c-=ontarrnna:::D:::R:::o=nt'-ir--'i::-:!~;~~~ L--------- -1 --- ___ L LIMITS no/S/92> * s~:=t(ft) ELEV. = 100.00 I ORO

' [• 690.0 MSL CESTIMATEDll I ~ ::

------"K"- I I

2' ppm 18.8

B-4 ~ I I • .1 s-2 1 } .i s-_<~ Sample Depth (ft) 13.0-15 .0 23.0-25.0 .,... B-<1 ... 000 .a:

I I I FORMER UST LOCATION 1 I I

S-4

Sample Depth (ft) 8'

S-2

Contaminant ppm

DRO <10 <10 43 130

Contaminant ppm ORO 125

I I I I

Benzo( a)anthracene Benzo(a)pyrene 30 230

Sample Depth (ft) 9' B-2/MW-2

Benzo( a )fluoranthene Contaminant ppm 1 _"'-3 I r------~===D=R=0===::!=:::1f23~ i~---------- ----------'

~3 i

<0.33 160

1 Sample Depfu (ft) 9.0-11.0 13.0-15.0 I

Contaminant ppm rr-:-+-.__ ESTIMATED EXTENT OF CONTAMINATED SOILS ABOVE tOO ppm AS ORO CSTS. 19921 s=£~= ~~o :1:; I ! ~ ~ ~ •. , ... ,

Benzo(a)fluoranthene 3.4 <0.33 S I .------.l.-----. ~2 ,_ I S-3 ~ I SOIL BORING/MONITORING WELL LOCATION Sample Depth (ft) 7.0-9.0 11.0-13.0

ANALYTICAL SAMPLE LOCATION

,_ I ~ I ~ I u I

I

Sample Depth (ft)

Contaminant ORO

8'

ppm

107

Contaminant ppm

DRO <10 <10 Benzo( a )anthracene <0.17 <0.17

Benzo( a )pyrene <0.17 <0.17 Benzo( a )fluoranthene <0.33 <0.33

.- CPL ""' li"'il!! T N & Associates, Inc.

f:!.:] Enc;~ineerlng and Science


Soil So.r~ple Ano.lytico.l Results

1 .... --

me

2

B-4 B-1 0

f--

I-- f-MIXED FILL

5f--f-

- f-74 PAH

10 f--

FEET BELOW' SURFACE f-

30 SAND PAH

15 1--

~ ~

GRAY~ '---

~ 20f--

25'--

iRJ T N & Associates, Inc.

~ Enoineerino and Science

"''-'& .,...,...._. ,..,,..., •• o,:rooooo't'a""•,.••••oton.oon

SILTY SAND -23 PAH -

AMERITECH FACILITY 845 N. 35TH STREET MILWAUKEE I WISCONSIN

B-3 B-2

-----1-"

I TANK EXCAVATION

I <DEPTH OF BASE all 1 I UNKNO'w'N) VI

I

u~s-1 S-3 ~ DRO 87.8 DRD 107 A

-'--1,- - - - - - - - - -

I 29

ESTIMATE: E~T;NT-OJ -' PAH 1--

CONTAMINATED SOILS ~ - - - - '<"7 - .__ -- - - -

SILTY CLAY ._____

<GRAY)

!J!l;:;;...=-:-:.:-1

CROSS SECTION - PLAN VIEW' -

GEOLOGIC CROSS-SECTION

-5

-10

FEET BELOW' SURFACE

-15

-20

-25

1"" CPL 1.,.

1DA1l _,_ .... , ... __ 1-.' 2

.......... T N & Associates, Inc.


July 9, 2004

Mr. David Blair, Hydrogeologist PECF A Site Review Section Wisconsin Department of Commerce P.O. Box 8044 Madison, WI 53708-8044

RE: Supplemental Closure Information Ameritech Wisconsin Bell Facility 845 N 35111 Street Milwaukee, WI 53280

Commerce#: 53280-0001-45 DNR #: 03-41-002600 TN&A Project No.: 2004025

Dear Mr. Blair:

RECEIVED JUt 1 2 2004

ERS DIVISION

Enclosed please find the additional documentation requested in your November 22, 2000 letter for closure of the above referenced site. In addition, we reviewed the original basis for the closure request described in an earlier TN&A letter report (Groundwater Monitoring Results and Site Evaluation for Case Closure, dated September 7, 2000) in light of subsequent site history. We conclude there have been no changes at the site or in the surrounding area that affect the conclusions in that report supporting site closure.

In your letter you requested that a deed notification addressing residual groundwater contamination at the property be drafted and placed on the property deed. Since the time of your letter the Wisconsin Department ofNatural Resources (WDNR) has begun requiring listing of sites with residual groundwater contamination on their Geographic Infonnation System (GIS) Registry of Closed Remediation Sites (in lieu of the use of groundwater use deed notices). Therefore, we have completed the package ofWDNR required documentation for registering the site on the GIS Registry. We have submitted a copy to the WDNR and included a copy with this letter.

Also, enclosed with this letter are copies of the following requested information: (1) monitoring well abandonment forms, (2) tank disposal documentation (no sludge was generated), and (3) investigative waste disposal documentation.

1033 N. Mayfair Road, Suite 200 • Milwaukee, WI 53226 • 414-257-4200 • FAX 41 4-257-2492

Please contact us at (414) 257-4200 if you have any questions, or ifwe can provide you with further assistance.

Sincerely,


;:::=:gr/,C Troy R. Thompson, PG, CPG, CHMM Project Scientist

Cc: Ms. Joni Nykiel, SBC/Ameritech

Q~~ Sr. Hydrogeologist/Project Manager



All abandonment work shall be performed in accordance with the provisions of Chapters NR 111, NR 112 or NR 141, Wis. Admin. Code, whichever is applicable. Also, see instructions on back.

~1) GENERAL INFORMATION (2) FACIUTY NAME

Well/Drillhole/Borehole I County Original Well Owner (If Known) Location m\/\1 !'-1\W...{ t.L>~£.. Wt~tO/\JUN 73t.L-L

. ~E Present Well Owner

5'&: 1/4 of {jllij 1/4 of Sec. _£:2 ; T.__:z_ N; R. ~ [i w .6 ME. e._., ?C.C.t+- /) J5:-(If applicable) Street or Route S[JC Cottp /C(:;,.<JL E

Gov't Lot Grid Number Sis- +-:::6 '~3s_r-- 3~5- F/JlA VJ6w Lf "' ~ ' . ':<1/t.-c I ,()6-6 I(_

Grid Location City, State, Zip Code &uu ft. D N. D S., ft. DE: D w. f'./jt'-W'A.v~?£. , 'vJ 1 S3u~

Civil Town Name ractllty Well No. and/or Name (ll Applicable) IWI Uruque Well No.

/}1 i L l,41-.4 U }( [ E. M~-'2- . . Street Address of Well Reason For Abandonment

{}1-/'5 f\J ' .35m.::::;,-. Sc rc CLo 5 () R.E City, Village ·

.::;-'3 2- I '1:, Date of Abandonment

D! , c/L--•:::> I 1YJ l t-.WAt)l<.c6 I wL. WELLIDRILLHOLE/BOREHOLE INFORMATION ~j) Original W ell/Drillhole/Borehole Construction Completed On (4) Depth to Water (Feet)

(Date) Pump & Piping Removed? 0 Yes 0N:>0 Not Applicable

Liner(s) Removed? D Yes ON:>0 Not Applicable

E2J Monitoring Well Construction Report Available? Screen Removed? DYes rgN:>rJ Not Applicable

0 WaterWell 0 Yes ON> Casing Left in Place? ~Yes ON:> D Drillhole If No, EXplain

0 "Borehole Was Casing Cut Off Below Surface? Ga Yes ONJ

Construction Type: Did Sealing Material Rise to Surface? f2S] yes 0 N:> ~ Drilled 0 Driven (Sandpoint) 0 Dug Did Material Settle After 24 Hours? 0 Yes~NJ 0 Other (Specify) If Yes, Was Hole Retopped? 0 Yes0 N:>


~ Unconsolidated Formation D Bedrock ~ e:ensn•£tlr Pirx-Gravity 0 Conducto~ Pipe-Pumped


Total Well Depth (ft ~ ) n.j Casing Diameter (ins.) 2.. (6) Sealing Materials For monitoring wells and

(From groundsurface) D Neat Cement Grout monitoring well boreholes only


Casing Depth (ft.) 1}'1 D Concrete I 0 Bentonite Pellets · I D Clay-Sand Slurry I 0 Granular Bentonite

Was Well Annular Space Grou~? 0 Yes ON:> 0 Unknown D Bentonite-Sand Slurry I

0 Bentonite - Cement ':rout I

If Yes, To What Depth? Feet f8] Chipped Ben10nite I

(!) Sealing Material Used

No. Yar?so Mix Ratio or Mud Weight From (Ft.) To (Ft.) Sacks Sealant

or Volume

C.+l 1Wf.D fft-\'lo, .. \l'iE Surface ft.i ,.._:!::P&ft-


WELLID RILLH OLE/BOREHOLE ABANDONMENT Form 3300-SW 11-89

All abandonment work shall be performed in accordance with the provisions of Chapters NR 111, NR 112 or NR 141 , Wis. Admin . Code, whichever is applicable. Also, see instructions on back.

~ 1/4 of Nlllf 1/4 of Sec.~ T.__::j_ N; R. __;u SBC applicable)

Gov't Lot Grid Number

Grid Location

ft. D N. D s .. ft. 0 E: D w.

WELLIDRILLHOLE/BOREHOLE INFORMATION tj) Originalef.Vrillhole/Borehole Construction Completed On (4) Depth to Water (Feet)

(Date) ~{.2.~12 -~z Pump & Piping Removed? D Yes ON>~ Not Applicable

Liner\s) Removed? 0 Yes D N> rEJ Not Applicable

f:8 Monitoring Well Construction Report Available? Screen Removed? DYes ~:ll Not Applicable

0 WaterWell [)3 Yes ON> Casing Left in Place? - ~Yes 0 Drillhole If No, EXplain

0 Borehole Was Casing Cut Off Below Surface? lil Yes 0 N>

Construction Type: Did Sealing Material Rise to Surface? I2SJ yes 0 N:l li$:] Drilled 0 Driven (Sandpoint) D Dug Did Material Settle After 24 Hours? 0 Yes gJ N:l 0 Other (Specify) If Yes, Was Hole Retopped? 0 Yes 0 N>


~ Unconsolidated Formation D Bedrock ~ f¥51 Fer Pi:p:-Gravity 0 Conductor Pipe-Pumped


Total Well Depth (ft.) I&~S Casing Diameter (ins.) ..3::..._ (6) Sealing Materials For monitoring wells and



Casing Depth (ft.) IB..BS 0 Concrete I 0 Bentonite Pellets I 0 Clay-Sand Slurry I 0 Granular Bentonite

Was Well Annular Space Grou~? 0 Yes ON> D Unknown 0 Bentonit.e-Sand Slurry I 0 Bentonite - Cement 0rout I

If Yes, To What Depth? Feet l8] Chipped Bentonite I

(T) Sealing Material Used From (Ft.) To (Ft.)

. NO. _!ar~ Sacks Sealant

or Volume Mix Ratio or Mud Weight

C-H1Wf.D ff~'lor-\1-'l'E Surface \8.,es- ,._~"ft

t!S) Comments: ..

(9)


WELLIDRILLHOLE/BOREHOLE ABANDONMENT Form 3300-5W • 11-89

All abandonment work shall be performed in accordance with the provisions of Chapters NR 111, NR 112 or NR 141, Wis. Admin . Code, whichever is applicable. Also, see instructions on back.

lll_ GENERAL INFORMATION (2) FACIUTY NAME

W ell/Drillho le/Borehole I County Original Well Owner (If Known) Location !Vlw (\1\lLl./ t.u~<i.. vtlcs col\.lrlN 0tLL

~E Present Well Owner

6e 1/4 of t{kjj_ 1/4 of Sec . .2S ; T. ( N;R.~I (]w tJ ME.~..J'lfft+-/.) [3C · (If applicable) Street or Koute ,.._ ,...>t S roC CO.(,P R-~ L

Gov't Lot Grid Number '3:{.:::- ~· :;S '-S;t'. ~S;It~ ~A~1~'~l_'V, q Grid Location City, State, Zip Code CPC::O(,

ft. ON. D s .. ft. DE, D w. rltCt-.\.JAuiC..cE, 'o..p.f I S3w3 Civil Town Name ractllty Well No. and/or Name (ll Appllcable) lWI Uruque Well No.

1'11 ;LwAUJCcf. MW-3 . . Street Address of Well . Reason For Abandonment

'8qs s . 35m Sr S 1 '('C_ a..asu ILE-City. v~ V<.IL 6"3 ;2./-:::,

Date of Abandonment D l · c/Z.. -~ C::> I 1LW4UK£;£.,

WELLIDRILLHOLE/BOREHOLE INFORMATION (j) Original W ell/Drillhole/Borehole Construction Completed On (4) Depth to Water (Feet)

(Date) Pump & Piping Removed? 0 Yes 0.l'b[E} Not Applicable

Liner{s) Removed? O Yes 0.l'b0 Not Applicable

E!J Monitoring Well Construction Report Available? Screen Removed? 0 Yes (3:u Not Applicable

0 WataWell DYes 0.l'b Casing Left in Place? - GSJ Yes 0 Drillhole If No, Explain

D Borehole Was Casing Cut Off Below Surface? Ga Yes D .l'b

Construction Type: Did Sealing Material Rise to Surface? ~Yes 0 .l'b ~ Drilled 0 Driven (Sandpoint) D Dug Did Material Settle After 24 Hours? 0 Yes~ N> 0 Other (Specify) If Yes, Was Hole Retopped? 0 YesO N>


(6] e n4u ter Pil'e-Gravity D Conducto~ Pipe-Pwnped !R] Unconsolidated Formation 0 Bedrock 0 Dump Bailer D Other (Explain)

Total Well Depth (ft ~ ) ~1.i Casing Diameter (ins.) 2... (6) Sealing Materials For monitoring wells and


0 Sand-Cement (Con~ete) Grout

Casing Depth (ft.) I\."{ 0 Concrete I 0 Bentonite Pellets I 0 Clay-Sand Slurry I 0 Granular Bentonite

Was Well Annular Space Gro~~? D Yes 0 .l'b 0 Unknown 0 B~tonit.e-Sand Slur.y I 0 Bentonite - Cement 0rout I

If Yes, To What Depth? Feet {gJ Chipped Bentonite I

(1) Sealing Material Used

No. :rar~ Mix Ratio or Mud Weight From (Ft.) To (Ft.) Sacks Sealant

or Volume

C.14 1W£D fft\'lor-\I'TE Surface A·'t ,._:3P«ft-

(lSJ Comments:

Delcore, Lee

From: Blair, David - COMM Sent: To:

Monday, August 12, 2002 9:07 AM Delcore, Lee

Subject: Blue Light sites

Hi Lee I was wondering if you could transfer a couple of Blue light special sites from the Milwaukee office to me in Madison. In response to Eric's blue light follow up email - I've been trying to get in contact with Ameritech Bell Facility (53280-0001-45) and Clark Oil #1997 (53022-5102-50}. Neither of these sites have made claims and there are no phone numbers listed in Tracker for the Ameritech site. I was hoping I may be able to get some information from the file that would help me get in touch with the RP for these sites.

David Blair Hydrogeologist Department of Commerce Environmental and Regulatory Services PECFA, Site Review Phone# (608) 261-2515 Fax# (608) 267-1381

1

1. Generator's US EPA ID No.

3. Generator's Name and Mai ling Address

At1ERIT.t:al 845 N. 35th St., Milwaukee, WI

4. Generator's Phone ( )

5.

7 .

9. Designated Faci lity Name and Site Address

AAA ENVlR(DENIAL ~'TRIES, INC. 3240 W. Elm Rd.

11 . Waste Shipping Name and Description

a.

d.

10 .

Manifest Doc. No. 2. Page 1

of

A. Transporter's Phone

B. Transporter's Phone

US EPA ID Number C. Facility's Phone

No.

.·· . . (

13. Total

Quantity

D. Additional Descriptions for Materials Listed Above E. Handling Codes for Wastes Listed Above

15. Special Handling Instructions and Additional Information

Signature

19. Discrepancy Indication Space

20. Facility Owner or Operator: Certification of receipt of waste materials covered by this manifest except as noted in Item t9.

Printedffyped Name Signature

GENERATOR'S COPY ,I.

WORK ORDER

ENVIRONMENTAL INDUSTRIES , INC.

-~):-i. ~ r:-: -1 2/~:~ -':J(} -·- - -~-- -

84 "'· f\i ~~st~ St·eet ··-··-·- -- -·-- --·--·

---- .. :· :: .:; ,,

.Start Ti ,.,-;e

q . i r::: ----~,.L _ ___ _

3240 West Elm Road • Frankl in, WI 53132 (414) 761-9421 • FAX (414) 761 -9542

Divis ion T F~N

Site Contact jim Kasd .::rt

'~ho r: e

LJ isp0Sa! Site

Quantity Ganerate ~.{\ Un•Ts -~A-J---------- .. --~'-C...-~--- --

)

Start Time :Jn-Site <;<, --.('"') . ' )J,/.'~---·---

- d 'T" 0 - ' c ' cr (.,, t:n ' 1m e n-S;te . _Jl""'·-L-'--' ----

'he above dcscnbed work has been performed with m y/our authorization and satisfact·on . The terms of payment are i'!et 30 days unless othervtise pre..,iously agreed to in writing Any unpaid balance wh!cn exceeds 30 days wiil be assessed a finance cha rge of 1.5% (18%iAPR) ,l:fntil p,a id in fui!

..... ~ ··· •... ·~ ; ,I :' ;' // ' / 'I

: ... . AJth.o rized B;r

/ I ."'-

' I

._.,.

initials: al <'· .

Date: 11/22/00 Requisition #: Requestor: Kendra Kennell ---------------------------Proj. No. : _2_00_0_0_0_7 __________________ _

Task No.: 0004 ---------------------------Proj . Name: Ameritech 35th Street Recommended Vendor: AAA Environmental Industries Street 3240 West Elm Road Ship To: Subcontractor will be on-site pending scheduling City, State, Zip Phone Number: Fax Number: Point of Contact:

Franklin, WI 53132 414-761-9421 414-761-9542 Alen Luttinen

Have other sources been contacted for quotes? YES if YES, list potential sources; if NO, explain justification: Advanced Waste National Tank Service

Required Delivery Date: To be determined

: :: f l~ro: t;~c;:; : ; : ; :;:;:::: :; : : :(:::;:::;::: o~~P~Wcir'l : : : : ! : f : : : ::: : ::: : : : ::; : : : ; :;: :::::::::ow::;::::: : ; ::: : : : :: :Vr;~t: :::: : ::: :::: :V~ti O,q~ :::: ::: : ::::::: e~cWn<t~q :CQ~~ ::::::: : :: Transportation and disposal of 1 lump sum $180.25 $180.25 one 55 gallon drum of non-hazadous liquid waste derived from groundwater.

Project Chargeable (direct): Requested by/Date

tl ~\118~/00 1\Q,{\d..JQ ~

All purchases

Non-chargeable (indirect): Requested by/Date

All purchases

Sales Tax Shipping Cost

Total

Project Mgr. Cost Center Mgr. Approval/Date

-+l""p~u""rc"""h'"'"a'"'s,.o.'i< ,tf/o~~· u 00

Cost Center Controller Approval/Date

All purchase If> $1,000

$180.25

Controller Approval/Date

If> $25,000

COO Approval/Date

If> $10,000

Illingworth --~~ CORPORATION

TN & Associates 1031 North Mayfair Road, Suite 200 Milwaukee, WI 53226

Attn: Jim Kasdorf

MECHANICAL SERVICES

Subject: Tank Removal Documentation

December 4, 2000

As requested I have enclosed the documentation on a 6000-gallon tank removed from 845 North 35th Street in 1992.

Please let me know if anything else is required.

Sincerely, ILLINGWORTH CORPORATION

~~·· · .~~ ohn C. Illingworth

President

JCI/bb

Enclosures

--- ---·-------------- ------ - - ---6j 615 South 89th Street • P.O . Box 314 • Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53201 • Phone: 414 -476-5790 • Fax: 414-476-0916

, ·

·· .,:.i:;;..,~~.

- ... . ~ ,

(414) 257-0030

TERM S:

COMPLETED TOTAL MATERIALS

Work ordered by _________________ __ _

"' ·ature _ _____: __________ --,---,---,--,----,------:--,----:----1 hereby acknowledge the satisfactory completion of the above described work.

PHONE

ORDER TAKEN BY

C -D ~DAY WORK

JOB NAME/ NUMBER

l..Ji 5c c...>.,_/;._; JOB~TION

JS' .,tt.JeCL5 JOB PHONE

(Qln lc5J I "Ll) ~ uriS) ) Lr=u ~ . l::=:J lJ

NQ 3396 DATE OF ORDER

CUSTOMER'S ORDER NUMBER

Re.v ~

0 CONTRACT 0 EXTRA

f3 ecL

- J v(rJv.J cu>t.:;c... )l,TARTING DATE

;s~.s~z_

TOTAL LABOR

TOTAL MATERIALS

TOTAL OTHER

TAX

'" ·& TOTAL

THIS MEMORANDUM ls an aci<nowtedgement that a bi ll of lading hos been issued and !s not :ho Original clll oi lading, nor a c:~py or dupUcate, coverlr.g the ~roperty named t.er:lln, and Is Intended solely for filing or record •

. , CARRJt:F?: : ·. , -~ ~ ~- - · . - .-. · ·-- ' · • ~ . l ! : '::. . - ~.

TO:

Zip

ERG ~27

State: Zip: NOTE -Where. the rate is dependent on value. shippers are required to state specifically in writing the 'agreed or declared value of the property. The agreed or declared value of the property is hereby specifically stated by the shipper to be not exceeding $ Per

Shipper's No.

Carrier's No. SCAC

FROM: Shipper ~ii;;;c . Eell / I lling;-rorth C..1 . Street N. 35th ~ 1-lel l s Origin HihJ. Zip

subject to the das.sfficatlons and law1ully , the property above in apparent good order, except as noted (contents and condition of contents of packages unknown) , mari<ed. consigned. and destined as indicated above which saJd carrier (tho word carrier being understood throughout this contract as meaning any person or corporation In possession of the property under the contract) ag rees to carry to its usual place o f delivery at said destination. i1 o n Its route . otherwise to deliver to another carrier on the route to said destination. It is mutually agreed as to each carrier of all or any o f. said property over all Of" any portion of said route to dest ination and as to each party at any time interested In all o r any said property. that every service to be . perlormed hereunder shall be subject to all the bill of lading tenns and conditions in the govemino ctasslflcation on the date of shipment . Shipper certifies that he is famil iar with a ll tho bill o f lading tenns and conditions in the govemlng Classification and the sald terms and conditions are

lllls t&-to eot11fy that the abovo-named materials are property dassified. described. packaged. mart(od and ~-('jr,r;;n;(Ti~:p-j~lf:ii'--'-.. ~li~l!!l~lli~TT:....:.-'-':~f'-'-'--'----'-'-'-"-'-.:.:..=-"-"-----,tfj~ labeled and ere in proper condition lor transporta.11on according to the applicable regulations o l tl"le Department of TransJ)Orta'ion.

·THIS MEMORANDUM Is an acknowledgement that a bilt of lading has been Issued and is not :ha Ortglnal sm o1 Lading, ncr a copy or dupU::ate, covering the prop_erty named herein, and Is Intended solely for flUng or record.

>

CARR fER: TO: Consignee ""National Tank Serv. Street Destination Zip

E..P ~ It;ru;nt f~o., VV l D 0 'l-3".038~.8(>" ~.Vii o~N.P.. ·No~ 1 OB4:S

Remit C.O:D. to:

State: Zip:

Shipper's No.

Carrier's No. SCAC

FROM: Shipper Street Origin

1-li.sc. Bell/Illing~·rorlh Co. N .. 35th & 'Wells St.

H:ilw.. Zip

of issue of i apparent good order, except as noted packages unknown), mar1ted, consigned, and destined as Indicated above which said carrier (the word carrier being understood throughout this contract as meaning any person or corporation in possession of the property under the centrad) agrees to cany to its usual place of delivery at said destination, 11 on Its route . otherwise to deliver to another carrier on the route to said destination. It Is mutually agreed as to each carr1er of all or any of, said property over aU

..... or iany portion of said route to destination and as to each party at any time Interested In all or any said property, that fN&ry service to be . performed hereunder shall be subject to all the bill of lading terms and conditions In the · :· -~lng classiftcatlon on the date of shipment .

hereby certifies that he Is famiiiW" with all tho bill of

. Th'- ·lw· to certify that the above-named materials are property ctassified. described, packaged, marl<:ed and &&beJed •nd are In proper condition for transportation according to the applicable regulations of the -ofT~.

THI.S MEMORANDUM is an acknowledgment that a bill of lading has been issued and i:s nat the Original Bill of Lading, nor a copy or duplicate, covering the pro~rty named herein, and is inlended solely for n1ing or record •

.: · ·.-Jar..asek co.± ' .

TO: Consignee Street Destination

.... - -~- .

-

i'ia tionc'l.l ':'a..n.k Se.:.."'"'\lice of ~-'II 1

1813 s . 73r d st=eet Hest .P~lis , 1ili ~~214

1-6 000 G\L. l:'l..BERG"'u'\S.S

..... ··; ~

Shipper's No.

SCAC Carrier's No.

Date

FROM: Shipper Street Origin

I-;Jisconsi11 I'<ii2lliil lirrJ\.-.ort:tl 35t h t, \ .i~~lls

$

Zip

C.O.D. FEE: Prepaid 0 Collect 0

0 YES ::€{ NO - RJRNISHED BY CARRIER DRIVER SIGNATURE:

transportation

~sconsin Department of Commerce

November 22, 2000

SUE HORN ASC SERVICES AMERITECH 2356 s 111TH ST. WAUKESHA, WI

RE: COMMERCE# 53280-0001-45 DNR # 03-41-002600 Ameritech Wisconsin Bell Facility 845 N 351

h St Milwaukee, WI 53280

ENVIRONMENTAL & REGULATORY SERVICES PECFA

P.O. Box 8044 Madison, Wisconsin 53708-8044

TDD #: (608) 264-8777 Fax#: (608) 267-1381

www.commerce.state.wi.us Tommy G. Thompson, Governor

Brenda J. Blanchard, Secretary

JAMES H. KASDORF, JR. TN & ASSOCIATES, INC. 1033 N. MAYFAIR ROAD SUITE 200 MILWAUKEE, WI 53226

Case Closure (Conditional Upon Receipt of Documentation)

Dear Ms. Horn:

The above referenced site was reviewed for closure by Wisconsin Department of Commerce PECFA Site Review staff in response to the closure request prepared by your consultant, TN & Associates, Inc., received by the Department on September 25, 2000. The closure request is for the release associated with the former 6000-gallon diesel underground storage tank removed from the subject property in 1 992. ·

Using the standards established in the NR 700 series, Wisconsin Administrative Code, and the risk criteria of Comm 46, Wis. Adm. Code, the Department has determined that this site does not pose a significant threat to the environment and human health and no further investigation or remedial action is necessary. It is understood that there is groundwater contamination present on site that exceeds NR 140 enforcement standards.

The following items are necessary as a condition of case closure. Within 60 days, please submit the following information to the Department at the letterhead address:

1. A notification must be placed on the property deed that addresses the groundwater contamination in the format provided (see-enclosed example of a deed notice). This would state that there is groundwater contamination on site. Please complete this and submit a signed, notarized, and recorded (with the County Register of Deeds) copy to this office.

2. All monitoring well abandonment forms.

3. Tank and tank sludge disposal documentation.

4. Investigative waste disposal documentation.

•

IMPORTANT: Before this case can be officially listed as "closed" on the Wisconsin Department of Commerce computer database, you or your consultant must submit the requested information. If review of the submitted information affects closure status of this site, you will be notified accordingly.

If in the future there is an indication that any contamination that remains poses a threat, the need for further remediation would be determined and required if necessary. If subsequent information indicates a need to reopen this case, any original claim under the PECFA fund would also reopen and you may apply for assistance to the extent that the remaining contamination is eligible under 101.143 Stats. and PECFA rules.

Please submit requested information to the Wisconsin Department of Commerce Milwaukee Office at 101 W. Pleasant St, Suite 205, Milwaukee, WI 53212.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at (608) 261-2515.

f:Y/tL( David Blair Hydrogeologist PECFA Site Review Section

Enclosure

cc: PECFA electronic file

State of Wisconsin\ DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

101 S. Webster St.

DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES

Tommy G. Thompson, Governor George E. Meyer, Secretary

RECEIVED

SEP 2 5 ZOOO

Box 7921 Madison, Wisconsin 53707-7921

Telephone 608-266-2621 FAX 608-267-3579 TDD 608-267-6897

September 25, 2000

AMERITECH 2356 S. 111 th Street Waukesha WI 53227

ERS DIVISION Mli.WAUKEE

Facility ID#241317670 BRRTS#03-41-002600

Subject: Transfer of Site File for Ameritech Co112 845 N. 351h Street Milwaukee WI 53210

Dear AMERITECH:

The recently enacted Biennial Budget contained language, which modifies the way the State classifies sites impacted by petroleum contamination. In addition, under this same language, oversight for sites falling under the definition of "low or medium risk" would become the responsibility of the Department of Commerce (Commerce) rather than our agency. Your site falls under this new definition of "low/medium risk" and as such, further reviews of submittals and technical assistance will need to be provided by staff at Commerce.

Due to the changes in this statutory language, we are transferring your site, along with all file documents for your site, to the Department of Commerce. Commerce staff will be reviewing your request and providing you with a response as to its adequacy in the near future.

If you have questions or concerns regarding your site, or would like to review any of the pertinent file documents, you should direct them to Commerce staff at the following address:

Jennifer Skinner Gregory Michael Linda Michalets Nancy Kochis FAX#

(414) 220-5373 (414) 220-5375 (414) 220-5376 (414) 220-5372 (414) 220-5374

Wisconsin Department of Commerce Environmental & Regulatory Services 101 West Pleasant Street- Suite 205 Milwaukee WI 53212

Thank you for you understanding as we implement the language contained within the recent Biennial Budget.

Sincerely,}~ ~ Kimberly smith Department of Natural Resources Remediation & Redevelopment

cc: Lori Huntoon - Commerce Site File

Quality Natural Resources Management Through Excellent Customer Service Printed on

Recycled Paper

............ T N & Associates, Inc.


September 7, 2000

Ms. Pat Chung Wisconsin Department ofNatural Resources Remediation and Redevelopment Program 2300 North Dr. King Drive P. 0 . Box 12436 Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53212

RE: Groundwater Monitoring Results and Site Evaluation for Case Closure Ameritech Facility 845 North 35th Street Milwaukee, Wisconsin TN&A Project No. 2000007 FID #: 241317670 BRRTS Activity#: 0341002600 WDNR File Reference #: 4400-2600

Dear Ms. Chung:

Please transfer the above referenced case file to Ms. Nancy Kochis at the Wisconsin Department of Commerce. The site is being reviewed for closure.

If you have any questions, please contact me at (414) 607-6743.

Sincerely, TN & Associates, Inc.

\~ ~. K~dd'f, J--

Ja~es H. Kasdorf, Jr. Project Geologist

Enclosures

Cc: Ms. Nancy Kochis - Wisconsin Department of Commerce

1033 N. Mayfair Road , Suite 200 • Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226 • 414-257-4200 • FAX 414-257-2492



September 7, 2000

Ms. Nancy Kochis Wisconsin Department of Commerce Environmental and Regulatory Services 101 West Pleasant Street, Suite 205 Milwaukee, WI 53212

RECEIVED

SEP 1 1 2nrt i PECFA SITE REV/Eli\ MILWAUKEE OFFIC f

RE: Groundwater Monitoring Results and Site Evaluation for Case Closure Ameritech Facility 845 North 35th Street Milwaukee, Wisconsin TN&A Project No. 2000007 FID #: 241317670 BRRTS Activity#: 0341002600 WDNR File Reference#: 4400-2600

Dear Ms. Kochis :

Please fmd the enclosed groundwater monitoring report and request for case closure prepared by TN & Associates, Inc. for the Ameritech Site located at the above-listed address. The purpose of the submittal is to request site closure for a low risk site from the Department of Commerce under Comm 46.06 and 46.07.

The site was reviewed and evaluated with regard to the potential, public health, safety, and welfare risks associated with the petroleum release and the existing conditions at the site. TN & Associates is recommending site closure with a groundwater use restriction and well abandonment.



~ !-{ . ~GtAd4 /J~ .

Jam s H. Kasdorf, Jr. Project Geologist

Enclosures

Cc: Ms. Sue Hom- ASC Services I Ameritech

1033 N. Mayfair Road , Suite 200 • Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226 • 414-257-4200 • FAX 414-257-2492

.......... T N & Associates, Inc.


September 7, 2000

Ms. Pat Chung Wisconsin Department ofNatural Resources Remediation and Redevelopment Program 2300 North Dr. King Drive P. 0. Box 12436 Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53212

RECEIVED

SEP 1 1 2000 PECFA SITE REVIEW MILWAUKEE OFFICE

RE: Groundwater Monitoring Results and Site Evaluation for Case Closure Ameritech Facility 845 North 35th Street Milwaukee, Wisconsin TN&A Project No. 2000007 FID#: 241317670 BRRTS Activity#: 0341002600 WDNR File Reference#: 4400-2600

Dear Ms. Chung:

Please transfer the above referenced case file to Ms. Nancy Kochis at the Wisconsin Department of Commerce. The site is being reviewed for closure.



\a.-- }\ . ~ Jov ~ James H. Kasdorf, Jr. Project Geologist

Enclosures

Cc: Ms. Nancy Kochis - Wisconsin Department of Commerce

1033 N. Mayfair Road , Suite 200 • Milwaukee. Wisconsin 53226 • 414-257-4200 • FAX 414-257-2492

.... ~ .. T N & Associates, Inc.


September 7, 2000

Ms. Nancy Kochis Wisconsin Department of Commerce Environmental and Regulatory Services 101 West Pleasant Street, Suite 205 Milwaukee, WI 53212

RECEIVED

SEP 1 1 2000 PECFA SITE REVIEW MILWAUKEE OFFICE

RE: Groundwater Monitoring Results and Site Evaluation for Case Closure Ameritech Facility 845 North 3511

' Street Milwaukee, Wisconsin TN&A Project No. 2000007 FID #: 241317670 BRRTS Activity#: 0341002600 WDNR File Reference#: 4400-2600

Dear Ms. Kochis:

On November 9, 1995 the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) requested that additional groundwater monitoring be conducted at the Ameritech facility at the above referenced location (the site). On December 13, 1999, TN & Associates, Inc. (TN&A) entered into an agreement with ASC Services Company, L. L.C. to complete the required groundwater monitoring and to evaluate the site conditions for case closure by the WDNR.

TN&A completed two groundwater sampling events at the site. In addition, the site history and existing conditions were evaluated with regard to the potential environmental, public health, safety, and welfare risks associated with the petroleum release at the site. TN&A is recommending site closure with a groundwater use restriction and monitoring well abandonment.

A summary of the site background and investigative history are provided to support the recommendation for site closure. The results of the two most recent groundwater monitoring events, as conducted by TN&A, are also summarized below.

SITE BACKGROUND The site is part of theSE ~ of the NW 14 Section 25, T 7N, R 21E of the Milwaukee Quadrangle (USGS [1958] 1971). The site is located within Milwaukee County and occupies an entire city block. The site is bordered by North 35th Street to the east, Kilbourn Street to the north, North 37th Street to the west, and Wells Street to the south. The 845 North 35th Street Ameritech building is located on the northern portion of the property; another Ameritech building, 801 North 35th Street, is on the southeast corner of the site. The facility parking lot is completely fenced and occupies most of the southern portion of the property (Figure 1 ).

In August 1992, PSI, Inc. removed a 6,000-gallon diesel underground storage tank (UST) from the site (PSI, 1992). Visual observations and laboratory analysis of soil samples collected during this event indicated that petroleum compounds were released from the UST system.

1033 N. Mayfair Road, Suite 200 • Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226 • 414-257-4200 • FAX 414-257-2492

Groundwater Monitoring Results and Site Evaluation for Case Closure ASC Services/Ameritech, 845 North 35th Street

Concentrations of Diesel Range Organics (DRO) ranging from 14.3 mg/kg to 125 mg/kg were identified in the soil within the tank excavation area. The laboratory analytical results of six soil samples collected from the walls of the excavation are presented on Table 1. Since the DRO concentrations exceeded the WDNR NR720 Soil Cleanup Standard, additional subsurface investigation was proposed.

In September of 1992, PSI, Inc. conducted a site investigation to determine the extent of petroleum impacts to soil and groundwater in the area of the former UST (PSI, 1993). A total of four soil borings were installed during this investigation and eight soil samples were submitted for laboratory analysis ofDRO, Petroleum Volatile Organic Compounds (PVOC), and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs). The laboratory analytical results identified trace amounts of PVOCs, and detectable concentrations of select P AH compounds. The P AH contaminant of concern, benzo (a) pyrene, exceeded the NR720 soil cleanup standard of8.8 ug/kg at two locations (B-1 and B-4). The laboratory results from this investigation are summarized in Table 2.

In October of 1992, PSI, Inc. installed and sampled monitoring wells MW1 through MW3. Groundwater samples were collected from the wells in October 1992 and in August 1995. During the 1995 sampling event, Benzo (a) pyrene was present in monitoring well MW1 at a concentration of 0.35 mg/L, which exceeded the WDNR NR 720 Enforcement Standard (ES) of 0.2 mg/L. No other compounds exceeded their respective NR 720 Preventative Action Limits (PALs). A summary of the historical groundwater analytical data from all the groundwater sampling events conducted at the site (including the TN&A sampling events conducted in February and May, 2000) is presented in Table 3.

In October of 1995, PSI, Inc. prepared a summary of the groundwater sampling results from the site and made a formal request to the WDNR for site closure. On November 9th, 1999, the WDNR denied the request for site closure citing that "groundwater contamination, over the WDNR enforcement standards has been identified at MW-1." In addition, the WDNR requested that groundwater sampling results should be below the PAL for two consecutive quarterly sampling rounds before seeking site closure.

Since the October 1995 request for closure, the WDNR and Wisconsin Department of Commerce (Comm) made changed their policies on site closure. Currently, sites with residual (low-level) contamination remaining in place can be closed if the site conditions comply with the provisions outlined in NR 726, NR 746, and/or Comm 46.06 and 46.07. Following a review of these regulations and guidelines TN&A completed an environmental assessment consisting of an evaluation of the environmental health and safety risks, and the site conditions. Our findings are documented in Attachment 2 to this report. Based on the environmental assessment, TN&A recommends case closure with a groundwater use restriction. The following information is provided to support this recommendation.

GROUNDWATER SAMPLING EVENTS On February 15, 2000, TN&A completed the first of two proposed groundwater sampling events at the site. Monitoring wells MW2 and MW3 were sampled and laboratory analyzed for DRO, PVOCs, and P AHs. Monitoring well MW1 contained no recoverable water and was not sampled.

~ ~le. >~ys t'3o )J~/L. Laboratory analysis identified DRO in MW3 at a concentration of 130 mg/kg. This concentration indicates that low-level diesel range organics were present in groundwater at the site. DRO concentrations in groundwater are not currently regulated in Wisconsin, however, a target guideline concentration of <100 mg/1 is desirable. PVOC concentrations in MW2 and MW3 did not exceed any established State of Wisconsin standards, as no PVOCs were detected above

ClosureRpt.doc 2


laboratory detection limits. P AH concentrations ofbenzo (a) pyrene were identified at concentrations of0.26 ug/L in MW2 and 0.22 ug/L in MW3. The established NR140 ES for benzo (a) pyrene is 0.20 ug/L. A summary oflaboratory analytical results from February 2000 is presented in Table 3.

TN&A completed the second and final groundwater sampling event on May 17, 2000. Monitoring wells MW1, MW2 and MW3 were sampled and laboratory analyzed for DRO, PVOCs, and P AHs. Laboratory analysis showed that DRO and PVOC concentrations were below laboratory detection limits in groundwater samples during this sampling event. P AH concentrations ofbenzo (a) pyrene were identified at concentrations of0.22 ug/L in MW2 and 0.15 ug/L in MW3. The NR140 ES for benzo (a) pyrene is 0.20 ug/L.

The trend of generally declining groundwater concentrations are consistent with the historical groundwater data collected from the site, and indicative of natural attenuation conditions affecting the site. A summary oflaboratory analytical results from the May sampling event is presented in Table 3. Copies of the laboratory analytical reports from the February and March 2000 sampling events are presented in Attachment 1.

LOCAL RECEPTORS AND CONTAMINANT SOURCES ASSESSMENT The following items were reviewed to evaluate the site for closure:

• Potential or known receptors including water supply, buildings, and utilities; • Species, habitat, or ecosystems sensitive to the contamination; • State- or federal-listed threatened or endangered species; • Wetlands as designated in NR 103-04; • Outstanding resource waters and exceptional resource water as defined in NR 102.10 and NR

102.11; and • Sites or facilities having historical or archaeological significance.

The WDNR was contacted to determine if any potable wells exist within a one-mile radius of the Ameritech 35th Street site. The City of Milwaukee municipal water supply system provides most of the water in the area, however, a review ofWDNR records identified three private wells within a one-mile radius of the site (Washington, 2000). The locations and depths of these wells are listed below:

• Tower Theatre, 757 North 27th Street- 1167 feet bgs. • Red Star Yeast, 325 North 27th Street - 1702 feet bgs. • Edwin Thierman, 2137 North 37th Street- 214 feet bgs.

The well at the Red Star Yeast location was abandoned. The depths of the remaining wells, combined with the low concentrations of site impacts, the low permeability of local soils, and the migration distance for impacts from the site make it unlikely that these wells would be affected by any releases from the subject site.

The potential migratory pathways existing on site include a utility corridor and the building basements. There is a utility corridor present west of the former UST excavation (Figure 2). The corridor is described as being an underground corridor or vault extending from just below the ground surface to approximately 10 feet below ground surface. The corridor is large enough for a person to walk through and contains electric power lines, telephone lines, domestic (municipal) water supply, and a hot water supply line. The corridor extends form the basement of the 845 North 351

h Street building to the basement of the 801 North 35th Street building. Both buildings

ClosureRpt.doc 3


are located on the site. There have been no reports of petroleum fumes or odors in this corridor or in the basements of either building. In addition, the potential for contaminant migration on site is expected to be minimal, due to the relatively low concentrations of petroleum impacts identified during the soil and groundwater sampling events.

There are two sewer lines that extend from the 845 North 35th Street building. One extends to 37th Street to the west and the other extends to Kilbourn Street to the north. Neither of these locations are close to the former UST location, and are not expected to be impacted form the UST release.

Based on available information, there are no sensitive ecosystems or habitats and no state or federally listed endangered species on or adjacent to the site. There are no wetlands located on or immediately adjacent to the Ameritech 35th Street site (USGS [1958] and 1971).

Based on a review of Chapter NR 102, Water Quality Standards for Wisconsin Surface Waters, there are no outstanding resource waters or exceptional resource waters on or near the site (WDNR 1998). The surface water bodies nearest to the Ameritech 35th Street site are Lake Michigan, located approximately 3 miles east of the site, and the Menomonee River, located approximately Y2 mile west of the site. The likelihood, however, of petroleum impacts reaching either location from the site is low due to the large separation distances, the relatively low permeability of the local soils, and the low concentrations of relatively immobile compounds remaining at the site.

Based on a review of the National Register of Historic Places, the South Layton Boulevard Historic District, located at 921-2264 South Layton Boulevard is approximately 1.5 miles southeast of the site. The State Register of Historic Places in Wisconsin lists several properties located near the Ameritech site. The listed historic places within a Y2 mile radius of the site are presented below (State Historical Society of Wisconsin, 1997):

• Michael Carpenter House, 1115 North 35th Street; • Edward Dahinden House, 3316 West Wisconsin Avenue; • Abraham H. Esbenshade House, 3119 West Wells; • Harley Davidson Motorcycle Factory Building, 3700 West Juneau Avenue; • Hihgland Boulevard Historic District; • David W. Howie House, 3026 West Wells Street; • Tripoli Temple, 3000 West Wisconsin Avenue.

The low concentrations of petroleum impacts remaining at the Ameritech property are not expected to impact any of these locations.

For the purpose of identifying potential sources of contamination that exist within a 1,200-foot radius of the site, TN&A reviewed the following resources:

• Spills Summary Report (WDNR 1995b) • List of Active Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) Sites (WNDR 1996) • Hazard Ranking List (WNDR 1994) • Registry ofWaste Disposal Sites in Wisconsin (WDNR 1993) • Comprehensive Environmental Response. Compensation and Liability Information System

List (Environmental Protection Agency [EPA] 1994)

ClosureRpt.doc 4


For the purpose of identifying potential sources of contamination that exist within a 1 ,200-foot radius of the site, select public records lists were reviewed. A review of the Wisconsin Spills list indicates that several spills were documented within a 1,200-foot radius of the site. Those spills are listed below:

• North 35th Street, 700 lb. calcium chloride, no action taken; • Menomonee River 56th to 35th Street, unidentified quantity of oil, investigated; • Menomonee River, multiple spills reported various locations; • Miller Brewing, 4000 West State Street, multiple spills reported; • 3205 West Highland, 4 gallons gasoline, no action taken.

The Miller Brewing and Menomonee River locations are hydraulically downgradient from the Ameritech site. Spills at these locations are not expected to have any effect on the site. The North 35th street calcium chloride spill, has no address given, however the substance is a powder and not likely to impact the site. The gasoline spill on West Highland is just beyond 1/4 mile from the site and not expected to impact the site.

Five leaking underground storage tank (LUST) sites were identified from a review of the LUST list to identify potential sources of contamination. These sites and their addresses include:

• Advanced Automotive Service 965 North 35th Street • Blankstein Enterprises, Inc. 3205 West Wisconsin Avenue • Humphrey Property 3442 West Wisconsin Avenue • Indian Community School 3134 West State Street • Vacant Comm Building/Econo LEA3504 West Wisconsin Avenue

The Advanced Automotive Site is approximately one block north of the site, and the Vacant Comm Building site is approximately one block south of the site. The LUST occurrences at these locations are not specific with regard to spill type and/or quantity; however, field data from the Ameritech site does not indicate that the site is being influenced from any sources or migratory pathways. The other listed sites are more than 3 blocks from the site, and are not expected to have impacted the site.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TN&A conducted groundwater monitoring and groundwater sample collection at the Ameritech-845 North 35th Street site in February 2000 and May 2000. The project included two groundwater monitoring/sampling events and a review oflocal wells, migratory pathways, sensitive areas, and local spills that may be present near the site.

Three potable wells were identified within one mile of the 35th Street Ameritech Site. One of these wells was abandoned. Impacts to the other two wells are not likely because low permeability soils are present at the site and in the local area, because of the low contaminant concentrations at the site, and because of the large separation distance and depth of the wells relative to the site.

There are no sensitive ecosystems or habitats, state or federally listed endangered species, wetlands or outstanding resource waters or exceptional resource waters located on or near the site. The closest water bodies are the Menomonee River and Lake Michigan. Based on a review of the National Register of Historic Places and State Register of Historic Places in Wisconsin, there are several historic places located in the vicinity of the site. The likelihood of petroleum

ClosureRpt.doc 5


impacts migrating from the site to either of the local water bodies or any listed historic places is remote due to the large separation distance and relatively low permeability of the local soils. The utility trenches on site are not acting as migratory pathways for the residual petroleum compounds at the site. There have been no reports of petroleum odors or fumes in the utility corridor or in the basements of either building on the site. The petroleum impacts at the site are localized around the former UST area, and are defined within the limits of the property.

There were five reported spills within a 1,200 feet radius ofthe site. There were also five LUST sites listed in the area. Two of these sites were within one block of the site, but the substances and quantities involved were not identified in the listing. The remaining locations are more than three blocks from the site. In general, there were no off-site spill sources or LUST incidents that appear to have impacted the site.

Although there is some residual contamination in soil and groundwater remaining on the site, the contamination is centralized around the former UST location and no additional remedial activities are recommended. Soil samples collected during 1992 had residual petroleum impacts that exceeded the NR 720 soil cleanup standards for some P AH compounds. The impacts are limited to the former UST area and are delineated within the property limits. Removal of the soil is impracticable because of the low P AH concentrations and because the P AH compounds are relatively immobile and not expected to migrate from the site. In addition, the site is surfaced with asphalt and further contaminant migration by way of infiltration is limited.

Groundwater at the site has very minor ES exceedances in MW -2, and minor PAL exceedances in MW-1 and MW-3. All three monitoring wells are proximate to the former UST location on the site, and the water sample concentrations exhibit a declining trend indicating that natural attenuation is influencing the site. There is no evidence suggesting that these impacts will migrate beyond the site boundary.

The site condition was also evaluated under the established WDNR and Comm guidelines for case closure. The residual site impacts are not likely to cause any potential environmental, public health, safety, or welfare risks, and the site is eligible for closure under WDNR PUBL RR-606(3)(b), Closeout Guidance on the Use of Deed and Groundwater Use Restrictions and Deed Notices, and Comm 46.07(c). Therefore, TN&A is recommending case closure with a groundwater use restriction and monitoring well abandonment.

Please feel free to call if you have any questions at (414) 257-4200.

Sincerely,


James H. Kasdorf, Jr. Project Geologist

enclosures

cc: Ms. Susan Horn/ ASC Services Company, LLC

ClosureRpt.doc 6

PSI, 1992, Phase III Contamination Assessment, New Berlin, WI.

PSI, 1993, Site Contamination Assessment, New Berlin, WI.

PSI, 1994, Underground Storage Tank Wisconsin Bell Billing Center, New Berlin, WI.

PSI, 1995, Monitoring Well Sampling and Analyses Wisconsin Bell Billing Center, New

Berlin, WI.

PSI, 1998, Quarterly Monitoring Proposal Wisconsin Bel/Billing Center, New Berlin,

WI.

PSI, 1998, Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Wisconsin Bell Billing Center, New Berlin, WI.

TN&A, 1999, Consulting Services Proposal for Groundwater Monitoring and Site Closure, Ameritech Facility, 845 N. 35th Street, Milwaukee, WL Milwaukee, WI.

TN&A, 2000, Groundwater Monitoring, Ameritech Facility 845 North 35th Street,

Milwaukee, WL Milwaukee, WI.

WDNR, 1993, Underground Storage Tank Located at the Wisconsin Bell Billing Center 845 N. 35th Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.

WDNR, 1994, " ... recommendation of additional groundwater monitoring. " Milwaukee,

WI.

WDNR, 1995, Petroleum Contamination at Wisconsin Bell Facility, 845 N. 35th Street,

Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI.

WDNR, 1996, Groundwater Quality, Chapter NR 140 Wisconsin Administrative Code.

WDNR, March 1997, Interim Guidance for Selection of Natural Attenuation for

Groundwater Restoration and Case Closure Under Section NR 726.05(2)(b). PUBL RR-

528-97.

WDNR, 1998, Water Quality Standards for Wisconsin Surface Waters, Chapter NR 102 Wisconsin Administrative Code, Register, February, 1998, No. 506.

Washington, Methew, WDNR, June 2000, Telephone Conversation.

References.doc

t1 QUADRANGLE LOCATION

T N & Associates, I no. AMERITECH FACILITY 845 N.35TH STREET MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN

Figure 1 SITE LOCATION MAP

ENTRY

FORMER SUPPLY & RETURN LINES

BENCH MARK ELEV. = 100.00 [: 690.0 MSL <ESTIMATEDIJ

91' :!'

~-4

SOIL BORING/MONITORING WELL LOCATION

ANALYTICAL SAMPLE LOCATION ('>.., r!..)

T N & Associates. Inc. AMERITECH FACILITY 845 N. 35TH STREET MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN

EXISTING AMERITECH BUILDING <845 NORTH 35TH STREET!

CONCRETE SIDEWALK

B-1/MW-1 -0- FORMER REMOTE FILL & VENT

S-6

I S-1

~----------~--- I I

I I I I

APPROXIMATE EXCAVATION LIMITS <10/5/921

I I

S-2.1 I .A_S-4 000 ...

I I

1-_, ::;:) <(

> >-1-::J ;::: ::;:)

w 1-w a: u z 0 u

I FORMER UST LOCATION 1 I I I I I I I S-3 I ~----------~----------1 I

ESTIMATED EXTENT OF CONTAMINATED SOILS

-0-B-3/MW-3

ABOVE 100 ppm AS ORO <STS, 19921

10 0

SCALE: I" = 10'

Figure 2 SITE PLAN MAP

N

5 10

Sample ID S-1




S-2 S-3 S-4 S-5 S-6

_ . . .. ___ .. _ _ .. __ . £~s~~~~l-~~~= ·--~est~t~~~~~~:- _East~~eR~n --s~-a~m~p~lle~ ·dt~eopt;tahti(ofi-ne--et.) -·- --· - -- -~----~--..• . --~-0--8~--~8'-~~~1-- . r-~~w ___ 8_~~9~~_a_-ll_-:_~:· __ s~0~8'~all I -- 8!?!_92 ·---___ 8_/5/9_~---·t·· ···-· ~'?'?~ - ..... . --------··-- -----· ------ ··--·-- !----·-----· ······ ---

--~~t-(~-a~_in_:f~2- --------- ·---- -- ·--8h-·-----r:-~. ':--~~-3-. -. - · --~~,-~-- ·· ----~·---Tis~---_, -----~3-------1 ~:S . . mglkg- milligrams per kilogram (equivalent to parts per million [ppm]) I 00/250 - NR 720 soil standards for predominantly sandy soils are I 00 mglkg, and for predominantly clayey soils are 250 mglkg.

'BOt"o .;-;:•>;"·-:;-~·:.:.·· ·····:::-;·--:~c·.·-·.··:~-~~- indicates exceedance ofRCLs "'-~~ .. -.::.~<:u4·11Mioilll..:.W...-..w~<~o~~~·"'""'"~'''"""illl•ul!l.j,~""'''~'~"'.:."''""''.-~'"'"''"'"'''%''''"'""'""""!1i!io~

IUs - PID Instrument Units

NR720 Soil Cleanup Standard

100/250*

Sample ID B-1 B-1

mglkg- milligrams per kilogram (equivalent to parts per million [ppm]) uglkg- micrograms per kilogram (equivalent to parts per billion [ppb])

Table 2 Historical Soil Analytical Results

September 16-17, 1992 Ameritect Property 845 North 35th Street


B-2 B-2 B-3

I 00/250 - NR720 soil standards for predominantly sandy soils are I 00 mglkg, and for predominantly clayey soils are 250 mglkg. RCLs -suggested residual contaminant levels as per WDNR interim guidance on PAHs

NA-Not indicates exceedance of RCLs

B-3 B-4 B-4 NR720 Soil Cleanup Standard

Sample ID MW-1 MW-1 MW-1 MW-1

Sample collection date 10/16/92 8/1195 2115/00 5/17/00

DRO (ug/L) NA <100 NA

PVOGs (ug/L} . · ...... --- . . i~c .. · .. =: ... :_ . ...... : .·. - ' ~·-. :: :

Acetone NA NA NA

Benzene NA <1.0 NA Ethylbenzene NA <1.0 NA Methyl-tert-butyl-ether NA <1.0 NA Methylene Chloride NA NA NA Toluene NA <1.0 NA 1 ,3 ,5-Trimethylbenzene NA <1.0 NA 1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene NA <1.0 NA Xylenes, -m,-p, -o NA <1.0 NA

PAHs{ug/L):· > :-- -- . - .- :·. - .·•· - -....

Acenaphthene NA <1.0 NA Acenaphthylene NA <2.0 NA Anthracene NA <0.20 NA Benzo( a )anthracene NA 0.33 NA Benzo( a )pyrene NA 0.35 NA Benzo(b )fluoranthene NA <0.050 NA Benzo(g,h,I)perylene NA 0.68 NA Benzo(k)fluoranthene NA 0.28 NA Chrysene NA 0.49 NA Dibenzo( a,h)anthracene NA <0.10 NA Fluoranthene NA 1.4 NA Fluorene NA <0.40 NA Ideno( 1 ,2,3-cd)pyrene NA 0.41 NA 1-Methylnaphthalene NA NA NA 2-Methylnaphthalene NA NA NA Naphthalene NA <1.0 NA Phenanthrene NA 0.65 NA Pyrene NA 0.97 NA

ug/L - micrograms per liter (equivalent to parts per billion [ppb]) NS- no standards established (Wisconsin Administrative Code, NR140) BOLD- indicates exceedance ofNR140 PAL

NA- Not Analyzed ND -Not Detected

-indicates exceedance ofNR140 ES

<100 :.· .. _ ... - .... . ...

NA <0.27 <0.32 <0.32 NA

<0.27 <0.27 <0.22 <0.67

:,-

<0.47 <0.41

<0.021 0.066 0.15 0.11 0.1

0.05 0.077 0.032 0.15

<0.058 0.3

<0.36 <0.36 <0.42

<0.046 0.15

::

Table 3 Historical Groundwater Analytical Results

35th St Ameritech Milwaukee, Wisconsin

MW-2 MW-2 MW-2 MW-2

10/16/92 8/1/95 2/15/00 5117/00 <100 <100 <100 <100

MW-3 MW-3

10/16/92 8/1/95 160 <100

·. . .. .· . :. 1;.--: .. ·c'· . ·. . .. '[ ·. -'~ ' -- -. __ -3 NA NA NA 2 NA

ND <1.0 <0.26 <0.27 ND <1.0 ND <1.0 <0.24 . <0.32 ND <1.0 ND <1.0 <0.22 <0.32 ND <1.0 ND <5.0 NA NA ND <5.0 ND <1.0 <0.21 <0.27 ND <1.0 ND <1.0 <0.54 <0.27 ND <1.0 ND <1.0 <0.86 <0.22 ND <1.0 ND <3.0 <1.34 <0.67 ND <3.0 . ·• ;•: .• _f :-. -- - - -•;· - "•

;:•. - _: ·-:, .: _->-.-: -. I'T'i·'' -_--· •-;· -_-.- I <2.0 <1.0 <0.47 <0.47 <2.0 <1.0 <4.0 <2.0 <0.41 <0.41 <4.0 <2.0 <0.2 <0.20 0.046 <0.021 <0.2 <0.20 <0.2 <0.050 0.19 0.13 <0.2 <0.050 <0.2 <0.20 o:l6 __ o:22 ---- <0.2 <0.20 <0.4 <0.050 0.27 0.17 <0.4 <0.050 <0.4 <0.10 0.19 0.15 <0.4 <0.10 <0.2 <0.050 0.14 0.083 <0.2 <0.050 <0.2 <0.10 0.22 0.15 <0.2 <0.10 <0.4 <0.10 0.054 0.060 <0.4 <0.10 <0.4 <0.20 0.57 0.35 <0.4 <0.20 <0.4 <0.40 <0.058 <0.058 <0.4 <0.40 <0.2 <0.10 0.67 0.33 <0.2 <0.10 NA NA <0.36 <0.36 NA NA NA NA <0.36 <0.36 NA NA <2.0 <1.0 <0.42 <0.42 <2.0 <0.10

<2.0 <0.40 0.26 0.14 <2.0 <0.40 <0.2 <0.20 0.47 0.30 <0.2 <0.20

NR140 NR140 MW-3 MW-3 Enforcement Preventive


2115/00 5/17/00 --- ---130 <100 NS NS . .....

·-· . ·. " .. ----... :_

NA NA 1000.0 200 <0.26 <0.27 5.0 0.5 <0.24 <0.32 700 140 <0.22 <0.32 60 12 NA NA 5 0.5

<0.21 <0.27 343 69 <0.54 <0.27 NS NS <0.86 <0.22 NS NS <1.34 <0.67 620 124

- ~·.:;·; > ':, .·:;~:. I : : .' : : --.-- -,:~;{::>_ ---- :- - ' . '!!~~---:- •: . -

<0.47 <0.47 NS NS <0.41 <0.41 NS NS 0.046 <0.021 NS NS 0.10 0.073 NS NS

_-- 0.22-' --··-

0.15 0.2 0.02 0.29 0.099 NS NS 0.18 [).11 NS NS 0.10 0.047 NS NS 0.18 0.092 NS NS

0.081 <0.020 NS NS 0.40 0.24 NS NS

<0.058 <0.058 400 80 0.82 0.19 NS NS

<0.36 <0.36 NS NS <0.36 <0.36 NS NS <0.42 <0.42 40 8 0.14 0.083 NS NS 0.28 0.20 NS NS

ATTACHMENT 1

(Please Print Legibly)

Company Name: 't N (). nd As <"6 cia ±e SJ t nc Branch or Location: M; I wav I< e (',. ) w I Project Contact: Ve e r kaY' f \ Telephone: LJ JY- ?-~1- Y 2C>O

Project Number. '2 0 0 0 007

Project Name:....;3~~'-t....:..~:..._.=S:...!+t-~P....::e....:..+..~..--..L.A:....l.m:...L.Le=.-'-v-__._i _..±_,_e_,.cub"-

Proiect State: ---"W~!....,_ __________ _

Sampled By (Print>: f e -+ e,... Sc t. oe ph oe ..s +e r Data Package Options (please circle if requested)

QC Summary Surcharge Site-Specific QC Required?

EnChem Levell! Std. Delivery Yes No EnChem Level Ill 1 0% (min. $50)

1\Jmaround @;r Requested (TA1) (circle): t (1 0 Bus. Days) Rush

(Rush TAT subject to approvaVsurcharge) Quick Turn Number: Date Needed:

Transmit Rush Results by (circle): Phone Fax

Phone#: Fax#:

Sam~te~ ~n HO~D ~re subi!l.7t.t~ ..

01 yes, Indicate ac sample and subm~ triplicate volume.)

Std. TAT Surcharge

1 day 3.0x 2day 2.0x 3day 1.5x 4day 1.4x Sday 1.3x

Matrix Codes w .. water s .. son A=Air C:Charcoal B=Biota

~ V t) 0 1241 Bellevue St., Suite 9 0 525 Science Drive 0 1423 N. 8th Street. Suite 122

Green Bay, WI 54302 · Madison, WI 53711 Superior, WI 54880

E . -H __ E __ M1=:· ___ a2_0-_4_6_9-_2_43_6_•_1-·B-00--73_s-_2_4_3s ___ so_s-_2_3_2·-3-300_·_1_-s_s_s-_53_s-_2_4_3s ___ 7-;15:·3:9:2·:5:84:4:•:1:·B:00-=837::;:·B:23:s=::::; FAX 920-469-8827 FAX: 608-233-0502 FAX 715-392·5843

CHAIN OF CUSTODY P.O.# ___ Quote# ----

A.' A=None B=HCL Mail Report To: \k ~ .'" Kct.......-·, .

FILTERED? (YES/NO:,..) ~~'-:r~~...a..;;,c...---:r---:r---:r---::-r---::f--7' Company: i=N ~ A SS oc i e:de .S PRESERVATION (CODE)* Address: (C>33 N .MtLy£'4\C &\

Received

Received By:

Received By:

~±e. 'ZOO , Mi #vJAv)Ce-f WI Invoice To: \Je ey . kb r .-j S 3 '2. '2 C,

sa.. m :L

me:

EN CHEM ·GREEN BAY

Batch No:~oo ltO(p Project Name or ID No. of Coolers:._--:. __

Temps: -~-'---L----"----·~ WI oni.Ytc~rct•l :~--',.......,~-

A. Receipt Phase: Date cooler was opened: . '~{ 1{ { o£) By: £2 1: Were temperture blanks present? .. (record temperatures above) ,; ...................................... YES ~

1: Were ctistody seals pr~sent? (Also record on COC) ........................................................... ~s · ~~'? ·2.fr(ti4 'f. . . ~

2:· Are COC documents prese~t? ............................................................................................. ltES N02

..

3: Were ~II sample containers for tests requested o;1he COC received? .............................. ~ N02

4:. Do sample lab~ls mat~h the COC? .............................................................................. : ...... ®s N02

5: Are there any short holdtime tests? ................................................................... : .................. YES1 ~

6: Ch'eck sample pH of preserved samples, (not VOCs) Completed ......................................... YES NO t@

7: Are sample volumes adequate for tests requested? ............................................................ ~ N02•

8: Are VOC samples free of bubble.s >6mm ........... · ................................................................. ~ N02 NA

9: Are dissolved parameters field filtered? ........................................... :: ................................. YES N02 '@. 10: Are samples preserved properly? ......... : ........................................................................... @ · N02 NA

11: Started nonconformance/phone log record if applicable. Completed ................................. YES NO ~

12: ·Enter samples Into Project Logbook. Completed ................................................................ ~ NO

13: Pla.ce laboratory sample number on all containers and matched to COC. Completed ...... @ No

B. Log-In Phase: Date samples were logged-In: G.. II ?{vD By:._....;{fo~--. ------1: Were samples received on Ice? (Must be s 4 C ) ................................................................. YSS N02

2: Is t~e COC signed as received by En Chern 7 ............................. : ........................................ -lEs NO

3: Is this Project a Quick Tum Project? .................................................................................... YES ~

4: Is there any sub-work? .......................................................................................................... YES ~ 5: Are any samples nearing expiration of hold-time? ('vVrthln 2 days) ............................. : ......... YES1 BP Contacted

7: Initiate Subcontracting procedure, SQP 1-REC-4, If applicable. Completed .......... ~ ........... YES NO ~ Short Hold-time tests: 48 Hours or less 7days Footnotes Coliform (6 hrs) Flashpoint .. 1 Notify proper lab group Hexavalent Chromium (24 Hrs) TSS Immediately. BOD Total Solids 2 Complete phone log. Nitrite TDS Ortho Phosphorus Sulfide Turbidity Free Uquids Surfactants Total Volatile Solids Sulfite Aque_ous Extractable Organics- ALL En Core Preservation Unpreserved VOC's Color Ash

lnitals/Date

fp2-((7(oD I

r-

IL~

[fJ Z{ll/{J() I

Rev. 12/15/99, Attachment to 1-REC-5. *SubJect to QA Audit.

1 have reviewed Log-In sheets, resolved all nonconformance lssues,corrected and properly documented these actions

Project Mgmt reviewed by/date_..I_)LV-=....__?1........,1 g..._\t-', VJ~I)\)F:\SOP\FORMS\GBCRL_03.DOC February 02, 2000

t1 1795 Industrial Drive

\ Green Bay, WI 54302

E ~-~-JYI-:::· _________________________________________________ 9_2_0_-4_69--2-4--36 800-7 -ENCHEM FAX: 920-469-8827

- Analytical Report -

Project Name : 35TH STREET AMERITECH

Project Number : 2000007

WI DNR LAB ID: 405132750

Collection Sample No. Field ID Date

800606-001 MW-2 2/15/00

800606-002 MW-3 2/15/00

800606-003 TRIP BLANK 2/15/00

Please visit our Internet homepage at: www.encheminc.com

Sample No.

Client: TN & ASSOCIATES

Collection Field ID Date

The •a• flag is present when a parameter has been detected below the LOa. This indicates the results are qualified due to the uncertainty of the parameter concentration between the LOD and the LOa.

Soil VOC detects are corrected for the total solids, unless otherwise noted.

I certify that the data contained In this Final Report has been generated and reviewed in accordance with approved methods and Laboratory Standard Operating Procedure. Exceptions, If any, are discussed In the accompanying sample comments. Release of this final report Is authorized by Laboratory management, as Is verified by the following signature. Reported results shall not be reproduced, except In full, without the written approval of the lab. The sample results relate only to the analytes of interest tested.

Date

En Chern Inc.

Lab#: TestGroupiD:

800606-002 DRO-W

MW-3

Comment:

Peaks present late In and beyond window.

1795 Industrial Drive Green Bay, WI 54302 920-409-2436 800-7-ENCHEM Fax: 920469-8827

En Chern Inc.


1 t~':J rnausma1 unve Green Bay, WI 54302 920-469-2436 800-7-ENCHEM Fax:920-469-8827


Project Number: 2000007

FieldiD: MW-2

Lab Sample Number: 800606-001

WI DNR LAB ID : 405132750

DIESEL RANGE ORGANICS- WATER

Analyte

DIESEL RANGE ORGANICS

Blank spike

Blank spike duplicate

Blank

Result

< 100

83

92

< 50

PAH (HPLC) LIST· SEMIVOLATILES

Analyte Result

Acenaphthene < 0.47

Acenaphthylene < 0.41

Anthracene 0.046

Benzo(a)anthracene 0.19

Benzo(a)pyrene 0.26

Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.27

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 0.19

Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.14

Chrysene 0.22

Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 0.054

Fluoranthene 0.57

Fluorene < 0.058

lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 0.67

1-Methylnaphthalene < 0.36


Naphthalene < 0.42

Phenanthrene 0.26

Pyrene 0.47

9,10-Diphenylanthracene 72.2

LCD

LCD

0.47

0.41

0.021

0.014

0.075

0.075

0.10

0.0090

0.016

0.020

0.075

0.058

0.12

0.36

0.36

0.42

0.046

0.085

Client : TN & ASSOCIATES

Report Date : 2/21/00

Collection Date : 2/15/00

Matrix Type : WATER

Organic Results

Prep Method: WI MOD ORO Prep Date:

LOa EaL

100

25

Units

ug/1

%Recov

25 %Recov

50 ug/1

Organic Results

Prep Method: SW846 3510

LOa EaL Units

1.5 ug/L

1.3 ug/L

0.067 ug/L

0.045 ug/L

0.24 ug/L

0.24 ug/L

0.32 ug/L

0.029 ug/L

0.051 ug/L

0.064 ug/L

0.24 ug/L

0.18 ug/L

0.38 ug/L

1.1 ug/L

1.1 ug/L

1.3 ug/L

0.15 ug/L

0.27 ugfl_

%Recov

Code

Prep Date:

Code

a

a

a

2/17/00 Analyst: DJB

Analysis Analysis Date Method

2/17/00 WiMODDRO

2/17/00 WlMODDRO

2117100 WlMODDRO

2/17/00 WlMODDRO

2/17/00 Analyst: ARC


2/18/00 SW846 8310

2/18/00 SW846 8310

2/18/00 SW846 8310

2118/00 SW846 8310

2/18/00 SW846 8310

2/18/00 SW846 8310

2/18/00 SW846 8310

2/18/00 SW846 8310

2/18/00 SW846 8310

2/18/00 SW846 8310

2/18/00 SW846 8310

2/18/00 SW846 8310

2/18/00 SW846 8310

2/18/00 SW846 8310

2/18/00 SW846 8310

2/18/00 SW846 8310

2/18/00 SW846 8310

2/18/00 SW846 8310

2/18/00 SW846 8310

En Chern Inc.

Project Name :

Project Number :

Field ID:

Lab Sample Number :

WI DNR LAB ID :

PVOC-WATER

Analyte

a,a,a-Trifluorotoluene

Benzene

Ethylbenzene

Methyl-tert-butyl-ether

Toluene

1 ,3,5-Trimethylbenzene


Xylenes, -m, -p

Xylene, -o

-Analytical Report -

35TH STREET AMERITECH

1/'d':J mausma1 unve Green Bay, WI 54302 920-469-2436 800-7-ENCHEM Fax: 920-469-8827

2000007 Client: TN & ASSOCIATES

MW-2 Report Date : 2/21/00

800606..()01 Collection Date : 2115/00

405132750 Matrix Type : WATER

Organic Results

Prep Method: SW846 50308 Prep Date: 2/18/00 Analyst: CAN

Analysis Analysis Result LCD LOQ EQL Units Code Date Method

102 %Recov 2/19/00 MOD80218

< 0.26 0.26 0.83 ug/1 2/19/00 MOD80218

< 0.24 0.24 0.76 ug/1 2/19/00 MOD 80218

< 0.22 0.22 0.70 ug/1 2/19/00 MOD80218

< 0.21 0.21 0.67 ug/1 2/19/00 MOD 80218

< 0.54 0.54 1.7 ug/1 2/19/00 MOD 80218

< 0.86 0.86 2.7 ug/1 2/19/00 MOD80218

< 0.97 0.97 3.1 ug/1 2/19/00 MOD 80218

< 0.37 0.37 1.2 ug/1 2/19/00 MOD 80218

En Chern Inc.


1/li:> maustnal unve Green Bay, WI 54302 920469-2436 800-7-ENCHEM Fax: 920469-8827


Project Number: 2000007

Field ID: MW-3

Lab Sample Number: 800606-002


DIESEL RANGE ORGANICS -WATER

Analyte


Blank spike


Blank

Result

130

83

92

< 50

PAH (HPLC) LIST· SEMIVOLATILES

Analyte Result

Acenaphthene < 0.47


Anthracene 0.046


Benzo(a)pyrene 0.22

Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.29


Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.10

Chrysene 0.18


Fluoranthene 0.40

Fluorene < 0.058

lndeno(1 ,2,3-cd)pyrene 0.82



Naphthalene < 0.42

Phenanthrene 0.14

Pyrene 0.28

9,1 0-Diphenylanthracene 76.4

LOD

LOD

0.47

0.41

0.021

0.014

0.12

0.12

0.17

0.072

0.016

0.020

0.12

0.058

0.20

0.36

0.36

0.42

0.046

0.14




Matrix Type : WATER

Organic Results

Prep Method: Wi MOD ORO Prep Date: 2/17/00 Analyst: DJB Analysis Analysis

LOQ EQL Units Code Date Method

100 ug/1 2/17/00 WiMODDRO

25 %Recov 2/17/00 WiMODDRO

25 %Recov 2/17/00 WiMODDRO

50 ug/1 2/17/00 WiMODDRO

Organic Results

Prep Method: SW846 3510 Prep Date: 2/17/00 Analyst: ARO

Analysis Analysis LOQ EQL Units Code Date Method

1.5 ug/L 2/18/00 SW846 8310

1.3 ug/L 2/18/00 SW846 8310

0.067 ug/L Q 2/18/00 SW846 8310

0.045 ug/L 2/18/00 SW846 8310

0.38 ug/L Q 2/18/00 SW846 8310

0.38 ug/L Q 2/18/00 SW846 8310

0.54 ug/L Q 2/18/00 SW846 8310

0.23 ug/L Q 2/18/00 SW846 8310

0.051 ug/L 2/18/00 SW846 8310

0.064 ug/L 2/18/00 SW846 8310

0.38 ug/L 2/18/00 SW846 8310

0.18 ug/L 2/18/00 SW846 8310

0.64 ug/L 2/18/00 SW846 8310

1.1 ug/L 2/18/00" SW846 8310

1.1 ug/L 2/18/00 SW846 8310

1.3 ug/L 2/18/00 SW846 8310

0.15 ug/L Q 2/18/00 SW846 8310

0.45 ug/L Q 2/18/00 SW846 8310

%Recov 2/18/00 SW846 8310

En Chern Inc.

Project Name :

Project Number :

Field ID:

Lab Sample Number:

WI DNR LAB ID :

PVOC-WATER

Analyte


Benzene

Ethylbenzene


Toluene


1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene

Xylenes, -m, -p

Xylene, -o



1 f!l':) rnausma1 unve Green Bay, VVI 54302 920-469-2436 800-7-ENCHEM Fax:920-469-BB27

2000007 Client: TN & ASSOCIATES

MW-3 Report Date : 2121/00

800606-002 Collection Date : 2115/00


Organic Results

Prep Method: SW846 50308 Prep Date: 2/18/00 Analyst: CAN

Analysis Analysis Result LOD LOQ EQL Units Code Date Method

102 %Recov 2/19/00 MOD 80218

< 0.26 0.26 0.83 ug/1 2/19/00 MOD 80218

< 0.24 0.24 0.76 ug/1 2/19/00 MOD 80218

< 0.22 0.22 0.70 ug/1 2/19/00 MOD 80218

< 0.21 0.21 0.67 ug/1 2/19/00 MOD 80218

< 0.54 0.54 1.7 ug/1 2/19/00 MOD 80218

< 0.86 0.86 2.7 ug/1 2/19/00 MOD 80218

< 0.97 0.97 3.1 ug/1 2/19/00 MOD 80218

< 0.37 0.37 1.2 ug/1 2/19/00 MOD 80218

En Chern Inc.

Project Name :

Project Number:

Field ID:

Lab Sample Number :

WI DNR LAB ID :

PVOC-WATER

Analyte


Benzene

Ethylbenzene


Toluene



Xylenes, -m, -p

Xylene, -o


1111:> mausmar unve Green Bay, WI 54302 920-469-2436 800-7-ENCHEM Fax: 920-469-8827


2000007 Client : TN & ASSOCIATES

TRIP BLANK Report Date : 2121/00

800606-003 Collection Date : 2115/00


Organic Results

Prep Method: SW846 50308 Prep Date: 2/18/00 Analyst: CAN Analysis Analysis

Result LOD LOQ EQL Units Code Date Method

102 %Recov 2119/00 MOD 80218

< 0.26 0.26 0.83 ug/1 2/19/00 MOD 80218

< 0.24 0.24 0.76 ug/1 2/19/00 MOD 80218

< 0.22 0.22 0.70 ug/1 2/19/00 MOD 80218

< 0.21 0.21 0.67 ug/1 2/19/00 MOD 80218

< 0.54 0.54 1.7 ug/1 2/19/00 MOD 80218

< 0.86 0.86 2.7 ug/1 2/19/00 MOD 80218

< 0.97 0.97 3.1 ug/1 2/19/00 MOD 80218

< 0.37 0.37 1.2 ug/1 2/19/00 MOD 80218

~= ..... --J!!!lJ!!!ll!!l., r------- ----....,,~ .-. --.-·- ... ·-- ,._,.______ ___,.... .. ., (Please Print Legibly}

Com~Nmne:. ___ -r~Y~~~~A~,~so~t~•~~T~k~$~.~~b~~~~·~---

~-Branch91'L.ociflon: 10~3. ..:,oil.'!"" 11 ...... ~r ..... R -·'$: "''I,.~O.u"-co.~ ' \Jo.ll ~7..17

Project Contact: 3' b. ""-i "!. t< .... ,.P<>•£ 'J

Telephone;· '-11'-i 4>01 <o,.,.3

Data Package Options (please circle if requested) QC Summary Surcharge Site-Specific QC Required?

Enc;t)em Level II Std. Delivery Yes No En~ Level Ill 1 0% (min. $50) Of yes, Indicate OC sampio and subm~ ·~ triplicate volume.)

E~em Level IV

((circle): · - Rush (Rush TAT subject to approval/surcharge)

Quick Tum Number. -------

DmeNeedoo: --------Transmit Rush Results by (circle):

Phone Fax

Phone#: -------------Fax#:

... ~ ...... ,.

Std. TAT Surcharge

1 day 3.0x 2day 3day 4day

CHAIN OF CUSTODY A=None B=HCL

Date/Time: Received By:

0 525 Science Drive Madison, WI 53711

608-232-3300 • 1·888-536-2436 FAX: 608-233-0502

0 1423 N. { f ~'Bnlte 122 super!TY.=~o 715-392-5844 • 1~7-8238

· FAX 715-392-11843

r .. ·-· ~) ,;:~

. ____ of ____ __

P.O.# ___ Quote# ----

Mail Report To: ~.... K.&5Moe E Company: lt>J., Assas:••TES ,T ... <

Address: to~-.. !::lo~'H ~fA,., IZaA'b

M•\o...,>Aq•sEE. WSc.:.,c:',o ~1 tZ

Invoice To: --:5'7......, ~$ bSlg.£

.4 "> AR-.vE

DatefTime:

t1 1795 Industrial Drive

\ Green Bay. WI 54302

E ~-~-fYI-:~·----------------------------------------·---------9-2-0--46_9_-2_4 ___ 36 800-7-ENCHEM

FAX: 920-469-8827


Project Name: AMERITECH 845 NORTH 35TH ST.

Project Number : 2000007 Client: TN & ASSOCIATES

WI DNR LAB ID: 405132750

Collection Collection Sample No. FieldiD Date Sample No. Field ID Date

802274-001 MW-1 5/17/00

802274-002 MW-2 5/17/00

802274-003 MW-3 5/17/00

802274-004 TRIP BLANK 5/17/00

Please visit our Internet homepage at: www.encheminc.com

The "Q" flag Is present when a parameter has been detected below the LOQ. This Indicates the results are qualified due to the uncertainty of the parameter concentration between the LOD and the LOQ.

Soil VOC detects are corrected for the total solids, unless otherwise noted.

I certify that the data contained in this Final Report has been generated and reviewed In accordance with approved methods and Laboratory Standard Operating Procedure. Exceptions, If any, are discussed In the accompanying sample comments. Release of this final report Is authorized by Laboratory management, as is verified by the following signature. Reported results shall not be reproduced, except In full, without the written approval of the lab. The sample results relate only to the analytes of Interest tested.

App~~ Date

.. COOLER RECEIPT LOG EN CHEM ·GREEN BAY .

Batch No. ¥0 :;J. :1. 7 { Project Name or ID ~000 00 1 No. of Cool~rs:\..-_J ____ _

Temps: ·I I oc ------~----~----~------

WI oniYcc~rc~•): ~

A. Receipt Phase: Date cooler was opened: 5/11 /oo . I

1: Were tery1~.ertu:e blanks present? .. (record temperatures ~o~e) ...... ,'N .................... · .......... YES~. ..

_2: Were c~stody seais present? (Also record on COC) .. : ............. : ............................... : ..... : ..... YES @. . ~ ~

3: Are coc d~cuments present? ............................................... : .... _. .... : .......................... ( .. :·~ NO

. 4: Were all sample containers for tests requested on the C~C re~elved? ........................ ~ N02

By:.__ _ _;::6~0:;...__~- tnitals/Date

0 GO 5tqj~()

5: Do sample labels match the COC? .................................................................................. @ NO~·

6: Are there any short holdtl~e tests? ....................................................... : ... : ........................... YES1 . ~ .

7: Are sample volumes adequate. for tests requested? .......... : .................. : ...... : .................. § NO~ a. Are VOC samples fre.e of bubbles >Smm .......... : ............ ; .............................................. ~ N02 .

9: Are dissolved parameters field filtered? ....... : ................... : .................................................. YES N02

10: Check sample pH of preserved samples. (not VOCs) Compteted ......................................... YES NO

11: Are samples preserved properly? ......... ; ................................................................ ~ ....... @ N02

~·

12: Started non~onformance/phone log r~cord if applicable. Completed ................................ : YES NO @. 13: Enter samples Into Project Logbook. Completed ................................................................ '@ NO . · ~T Jplf'~ --v . 14: Place laboratory sample number an all containers Completed @ NO

15: Check laboratory sample number an all containers and COC Completed /8 NO

B. Log-In Phase: Date samples were lagged-In: 5'"( ( "i{cp By:. __ __,.C:;..;,a:.::;.. _____ __

(; () 5/t 1 /oo

1: Were samples received on ice? (Must be " 4 C) ................................................................. '& NO~

2: Is the COC signed as received by En Chern 7 ......................... : ............................. : ............. .''9S . . ;

3: Is this Project a Quick Tum Project? .................................................................................... YES

NO

~ 4: Is there any sub-work? ............................... : ......................................................................... YES &0

\ 5: Are any samples nearing expiration of hold-time? (Within 2 days) ....................................... YES1 ~ Contacted

6: Initiate Subcontracting procedure, SOP 1-REC-4, if applicable. Completed ...................... YES NO ~A Short Hold-time tests· 48 Hours or tess 7days Footnotes Coliform (6 hrs) Flash point 1 Notify proper lab group Hexavalent Chromium {24 Hrs) TSS Immediately. BOD Total Solids 2 Complete phone log. Nitrite TDS Ortho Phosphorus Sulfide Turbidity Free Uquids Surfactants Total Volatile Solids Sulfite Aqueo~s Extractable Organics- ALL En Core Preservation Unpreserved VOC's Color Ash Rev. 12/15/99, Attachment to 1-REO.S. *Subject to QA Audit.

l have reviewed Log-In sheets, resolved all nonconformance lssues,corrected and properly documented these actions

Project Mgmt reviewed by/date_~~=--IJ""u"""i"-i}""'tn'-"-r u-F:\SOP\FORMS\GBCRL_04.DOC Aprll24,2000

En Chern Inc.


1795 Industrial Drive Green Bay, WI 54302 920-469-2436 800-7-ENCHEM Fax: 920-469-8827

Project Name : AMERITECH 845 NORTH 35TH ST.

Project Number : 2000007 Client : TN & ASSOCIATES

FieldiD: MW-1 Report Date : 5/26/00

Lab Sample Number : 802274-001 Collection Date: 5/17/00

WI DNR LAB ID : 405132750 Matrix Type: WATER

Organic Results

DIESEL RANGE ORGANICS- WATER Prep Method: Wi MOD ORO Prep Date: 5/22/00 Analyst: DJB

Analysis Analysis Analyte Result LCD LOQ EQL Units Code Date Method

DIESEL RANGE ORGANICS < 100 100 ug/1 5/22100 WiMOD ORO

Blank spike 81 25 %Recov 5/22/00 WiMODDRO

Blank spike duplicate 87 25 %Recov 5/22/00 WiMODDRO

Blank < 50 50 ug/1 5/22/00 WiMOD ORO

Organic Results

PAH (HPLC) LIST- SEMIVOLATILES Prep Method: SW846 3510 Prep Date: 5/24/00 Analyst: ARO

Analysis Analysis Analyte Result LOD LOQ EQL Units Code Date Method

Acenaphthene < 0.47 0.47 1.5 ug/L 5/25/00 SW846 8310

Acenaphthylene < 0.41 0.41 1.3 ug/L 5/25/00 SW846 8310

Anthracene < 0.021 0.021 0.067 ug/L 5/25/00 SW846 8310

Benzo(a)anthracene 0.066 0.014 0.045 ug/L 5/25/00 SW846 8310

Benzo(a)pyrene 0.15 0.015 0.048 ug/L 5/25/00 SW846 8310

Benzo(b )fluoranthene 0.11 0.015 0.048 ug/L 5/25/00 SW846 8310

Benzo(g, h, i)perylene 0.10 0.021 0.067 ug/L 5/25/00 SW846 8310

Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.050 0.0090 0.029 ug/L 5/25/00 SW846 8310

Chrysene 0.077 0.016 0.051 ug/L 5/25/00 SW846 8310

Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 0.032 0.020 0.064 ug/L Q 5/25/00 SW846 8310

Fluoranthene 0.15 0.015 0.048 ug/L 5/25/00 SW846 8310

Fluorene < 0.058 0.058 0.18 ug/L 5/25/00 SW846 8310

lndeno(1 ,2,3-cd)pyrene 0.30 0.050 0.16 ug/L 5/25/00 SW846 8310

1-Methylnaphthalene < 0.36 0.36 1.1 ug/L 5/25/00 SW846 8310


Naphthalene < 0.42 0.42 1.3 ug/L 5/25/00 SW846 8310

Phenanthrene < 0.046 0.046 0.15 ug/L 5/25/00 SW846 8310

Pyrene 0.15 0.017 0.054 ug/L 5/25/00 SW846 8310

9,1 0-Diphenylanthracene 93.0 %Recov 5/25/00 SW846 8310

En Chern Inc.

Project Name :

Project Number :

FieldiD:

Lab Sample Number:

WI DNR LAB ID :

PVOC-WATER

Analyte

Toluene-dB

4-Bromofluorobenzene

Dibromofluoromethane

Benzene

Ethylbenzene


Toluene



Xylenes, -m, -p

Xylene, -o


AMERITECH 845 NORTH 35TH ST.

1795 Industrial Drive Green Bay, WI 54302 920-469-2436 800-7-ENCHEM Fax: 920-469-8827



802274-001 Collection Date : 5/17/00

405132750 Matrix Type: WATER

Organic Results

Prep Method: SW846 50308 Prep Date: 5/25/00 Analyst: JJB


93 %Recov 5/25/00 SW846 82608

84 %Recov 5/25/00 SW8468260B

91 %Recov 5/25/00 SW8468260B

< 0.27 0.27 0.86 ug/L 5/25/00 SW8468260B

< 0.32 0.32 1.0 ug/L 5/25/00 SW846 82608

< 0.32 0.32 1.0 ug/L 5/25/00 SW8468260B

< 0.27 0.27 0.86 ug/L 5/25/00 SW846 82608

< 0.27 0.27 0.86 ug/L 5/25/00 SW846 82608

< 0.22 0.22 0.70 ug/L 5/25/00 SW846 82608

< 0.43 0.43 1.4 ug/L 5/25/00 SW846 82608

< 0.24 0.24 0.76 ug/L 5/25/00 SW846 82608

En Chern Inc.

-Analytical Report-

111:1o moustnal unve Green Bay, WI 54302 920-469-2436 800-7-ENCHEM Fax: 920-469-8827

Project Name: AMERITECH 845 NORTH 35TH ST.

Project Number : 2000007

FieldiD: MW-2

Lab Sample Number : 802274-002


DIESEL RANGE ORGANICS -WATER

Analyte


Blank spike


Blank

Result

< 100

81

87

< 50

PAH (HPLC) LIST- SEMIVOLATILES

Analyte Result

Acenaphthene < 0.47


Anthracene < 0.021


Benzo(a)pyrene 0.22

Benzo(b )tluoranthene 0.17


Benzo(k)tluoranthene 0.083

Chrysene 0.15


Fluoranthene 0.35

Fluorene < 0.058

lndeno(1 ,2,3-cd)pyrene 0.33



Naphthalene < 0.42

Phenanthrene 0.14

Pyrene 0.30

9,1 0-Diphenylanthracene 93.3

LOD

LOD

0.47

0.41

0.021

0.014

0.045

0.015

0.021

0.0090

0.016

0.020

0.045

0.058

0.075

0.36

0.36

0.42

0.046

0.051




Matrix Type: WATER

Organic Results

Prep Method: WI MOD ORO

LOQ EQL

100

25

Units

ugll

%Recov

25 %Recov

50 ugll

Organic Results

Prep Method: SW846 3510

LOQ EQL Units

1.5 ug/L

1.3 ug/L

0.067 ug/L

0.045 ug/L

0.14 ug/L

0.048 ug/L

0.067 ug/L

0.029 ug/L

0.051 ug/L

0.064 ug/L

0.14 ug/L

0.18 ug/L

0.24 ug/L

1.1 ug/L

1.1 ug/L

1.3 ug/L

0.15 ug/L

0.16 ug/L

%Recov

Prep Date:

Code

Prep Date:

Code

Q

Q

5/22/00 Analyst: DJB


5/22/00 W.MODDRO

5/22/00 WIMODDRO

5/22/00 WIMODDRO

5/22/00 WIMODDRO

5/24/00 Analyst: ARO


5/25/00 SW846 8310

5/25/00 SW846 8310

5/25/00 SW846 8310

5/25/00 SW846 8310

5/25/00 SW846 8310

5/25/00 SW846 8310

5/25/00 SW846 8310

5/25/00 SW8468310

5/25/00 SW846 8310

5/25/00 SW846 8310

5/25/00 SW846 8310

5/25/00 SW846 8310

5/25/00 SW846 8310

5/25/00 SW846 8310

5/25/00 SW846 8310

5/25/00 SW846 8310

5/25/00 SW846 8310

5/25/00 SW846 8310

5/25/00 SW846 8310

En Chern Inc.

Project Name :

Project Number:

FieldiD:

Lab Sample Number :

WI DNR LAB ID :

PVOC-WATER

Analyte

Toluene-dB



Benzene

Ethylbenzene


Toluene



Xylenes, -m, -p

Xylene, -o



1 til:! mausma1 unve Green Bay, VVI 54302 920-469-2436 B00-7-ENCHEM Fax:920-469-8B27



802274-002 Collection Date : 5/17/00


Organic Results

Prep Method: SW846 50308 Prep Date: 5/22/00 Analyst: HW

Analysis Analysis Result LCD LOQ EQL Units Code Date Method

111 %Recov 5/22/00 SW846 82608

108 %Recov 5/22/00 SW84682608

111 %Recov 5/22/00 SW84682608

< 0.27 0.27 0.86 ug/L 5/22/00 SW84682608

< 0.32 0.32 1.0 ug/L 5/22/00 SW846 82608

< 0.32 0.32 1.0 ug/L 5/22/00 SW84682608

< 0.27 0.27 0.86 ug/L 5/22/00 SW84682608

< 0.27 0.27 0.86 ug/L 5/22/00 SW846 82608

< 0.22 0.22 0.70 ug/L 5/22/00 SW846 82608

< 0.43 0.43 1.4 ug/L 5/22/00 SW84682608

< 0.24 0.24 0.76 ug/L 5/22/00 SW846 82608

ll'd::. mausma1 unve

En Chern Inc. Green Bay, WI 54302 920-469-2436 800-7-ENCHEM Fax: 920-469-8827


Project Name : AMERITECH 845 NORTH 35TH ST.

Project Number: 2000007 Client : TN & ASSOCIATES

FieldiD: MW-3 Report Date : 5/25/00

Lab Sample Number : 802274-003 Collection Date : 5/17/00

WI DNR LAB 10 : 405132750 Matrix Type: WATER

Organic Results

DIESEL RANGE ORGANICS- WATER Prep Method: WI MOD ORO Prep Date: 5122100 Analyst: DJB


DIESEL RANGE ORGANICS < 100 100 ug/L 5122100 WIMODDRO

Blank spike 81.0 1.00 %recov 5122100 WIMODDRO

Blank spike duplicate 87.0 1.00 % recov 5/22/00 WIMODDRO

Blank < 50 50 ug/L 5122100 WIMODDRO

Organic Results

PAH (HPLC) LIST- SEMIVOLATILES Prep Method: SW846 3510 Prep Date: 5/24/00 Analyst: ARC


Acenaphthene < 0.47 0.47 1.5 ug/L 5/25/00 SW846 8310

Acenaphthylene < 0.41 0.41 1.3 ug/L 5125100 SW846 8310

Anthracene < 0.021 0.021 0.067 ug/L 5/25/00 SW846 8310

Benzo(a)anthracene 0.073 0.014 0.045 ug/L 5125100 SW846 8310

Benzo(a)pyrene 0.15 0.015 0.048 ug/L 5125100 SW846 8310

Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.099 0.015 0.048 ug/L 5/25/00 SW846 8310

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 0.11 0.021 0.067 ug/L 5125100 SW846 8310

Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.047 0.0090 0.029 ug/L 5/25/00 SW846 8310

Chrysene 0.092 0.016 0.051 ug/L 5125100 SW846 8310

Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene < 0.020 0.020 0.064 ug/L 5/25/00 SW846 8310

Fluoranthene 0.24 0.030 0.096 ug/L 5/25/00 SW846 8310

Fluorene < 0.058 0.058 0.18 ug/L 5/25/00 SW846 8310

lndeno(1 ,2,3-cd)pyrene 0.19 0.050 0.16 ug/L 5/25/00 SW846 8310



Naphthalene < 0.42 0.42 1.3 ug/L 5/25/00 SW846 8310

Phenanthrene 0.083 0.046 0.15 ug/L Q 5/25/00 SW846 8310

Pyrene 0.20 0.034 0.11 ug/L 5/25/00 SW846 8310

9,1 0-Diphenylanthracene 102 %Recov 5/25/00 SW846 8310

En Chern Inc.

Project Name :

Project Number:

FieldiD:

Lab Sample Number :

WI DNR LAB ID :

PVOC-WATER

Analyte

Toluene-dB



Benzene

Ethylbenzene


Toluene



Xylenes, -m, -p

Xylene, -o



1 ttJo mausma1 unve Green Bay, WI 54302 920-469-2436 800-7-ENCHEM Fax:920-469-8827



802274-003 Collection Date : 5/17/00


Organic Results

Prep Method: SW846 50308 Prep Date: 5/22/00 Analyst: HW


110 %Recov 5/22/00 SW84682608

108 %Recov 5/22/00 SW84682608

110 %Recov 5/22/00 SW846 82608

< 0.27 0.27 0.86 ug/L 5/22/00 SW846 82608

< 0.32 0.32 1.0 ug/L 5/22/00 SW846 82608

< 0.32 0.32 1.0 ug/L 5/22/00 SW84682608

< 0.27 0.27 0.86 ug/L 5122/00 SW846 82608

< 0.27 0.27 0.86 ug/L 5/22/00 SW84682608

< 0.22 0.22 0.70 ug/L 5/22/00 SW846 82608

< 0.43 0.43 1.4 ug!L 5/22/00 SW846 82608

< 0.24 0.24 0.76 ug/L 5/22/00 SW84682608

En Chern Inc.

Project Name :

Project Number :

FieldiD:

Lab Sample Number:

WI DNR LAB ID :

PVOC-WATER

Analyte

Toluene-dB



Benzene

Ethylbenzene


Toluene



Xylenes, -m, -p

Xylene, -o



lt'd':J mausma1 unve Green Bay, WI 54302 920-469-2436 800-7-ENCHEM Fax:920-469-8827


TRIP BLANK Report Date : 5/23/00

802274-004 Collection Date : 5/17/00


Organic Results

Prep Method: SW846 50308 Prep Date: 5/22/00 Analyst: HW Analysis Analysis

Result LCD LOQ EQL Units Code Date Method

110 %Recov 5/22/00 SW8468260B

108 %Recov 5/22/00 SW846 82608

108 %Recov 5/22/00 SW846 82608

< 0.27 0.27 0.86 ug/L 5/22/00 SW846 82608

< 0.32 0.32 1.0 ug/L 5/22/00 SW846 82608

< 0.32 0.32 1.0 ug/L 5/22/00 SW846 82608

< 0.27 0.27 0.86 ug/L 5/22/00 SW846 82608

< 0.27 0.27 0.86 ug/L 5/22/00 SW846 82608

< 0.22 0.22 0.70 ug/L 5/22/00 SW846 82608

< 0.43 0.43 1.4 ug/L 5/22/00 SW846 82608

< 0.24 0.24 0.76 ug/L 5/22/00 SW846 82608

ATTACHMENT 2

I

INTRODUCTION

Site evaluation for Case Closure - Attachment 2 Ameritech Facility- 845 North 35th Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin

ATTACHMENT 2 CASE CLOSURE JUSTIFICATION

A subsurface investigation was conducted at the Arneritech property located at 845 North 35th Street in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Closure for the site is being sought under Department of Commerce (Comm) 46.07 (c). Since some residual contamination remains at the site, the WDNR Publication RR-606 titled, "Close Out Guidance on the Use of Deed and Groundwater Use Restrictions and Deed Notices", was also reviewed to determine a recommended site closure procedure. Site closure with a groundwater use and restriction and monitoring well abandonment is recommended for the site. The case for site closure under these guidelines is presented below.

BACKGROUND

Arneritech owns the site and uses the 845 North 35th Street building as an administrative facility. A portion of the site is also used for employee parking. Arneritech has owned the property for approximately 40 to 50 years, plans to retain ownership ofthe site, and has no intention of selling the site. In accordance with established regulatory procedures a subsurface investigation was conducted at the site to investigate petroleum impacts originating from a former underground storage tank (UST) located on the site.

Although there are minor residual contaminant concentrations present at the site, the source of the petroleum release at the site has been addressed and corrected, and the impacts are not expected to migrate away from the former UST investigation area, or off the site.

RISK ASSESSMENT SCREENING

1. Risk Assessment Screening The criteria for screening these risks are provided under Comm 46.06, and include a review of several criteria outlined in Comm 47.337 (3). Since residual contamination is present at the Arneritech property site, Comm 46.06, requires that the potential environmental, public health, safety, and welfare risks associated with the site petroleum discharge be evaluated to determine whether a remedial action is required.

Based on a review ofComm 46.06, and including a review ofComm 47.337 (3)(a-d), the Environmental Factors of concern, existing at the site, are assessed as follows:

(3)(a) Environmental Factors

(3)(a)(l) A documented expansion of a contaminant plume margin.

The source of the petroleum release at the site was presumably caused by a UST used for fueling the former boiler for building heat. The removal of the former UST system, and

T N & Associates, Inc. RemediaiAitematives.doc Page 1

Site evaluation for Case Closure - Attachment 2 Ameritech Facility - 845 North 35th Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin

the initial subsurface investigations were not conducted by TN&A, but are documented in previous reports prepared by another consultant. The investigation conducted by TN&A ~ocuments the residual impacts in soil and groundwater at the site and summarizes the historical soil and groundwater data collected from the site. Based on this review, TN&A determined that the contaminant plume is defined within the property boundary of the site, and that the plume margin is most likely to remain within the limits of the property.

(3)(a)(2) Verified contaminant concentrations in a private or public potable well that exceeds the preventive action limit established under ch. 160 Stats.

Included in this review is an assessment of local water supplies. Municipal water supply provides most of the water in the area. However, a review ofWDNR records identified three private wells within a one-mile radius of the site. The locations and depths of these wells are listed below:

• Tower Theatre, 757 North 2ih Street- 1167 feet below ground surface (bgs). • Red Star Yeast, 325 North 271h Street - 1702 feet bgs. • Edwin Thierman, 2137 North 3ih Street- 214 feet bgs.

The well at Red Star Yeast is abandoned. The depths of the other two wells and the distances contaminants would have to migrate from the site make it unlikely that either of these wells would be affected by the release at the site.

(3)(a)(3) Contamination within bedrock, or within 1 meter of bedrock.

WDNR well installation records indicate that limestone bedrock is likely to occur at depths from 79 to 103 feet bgs in the local area. The deepest boring completed at the site was 25 feet bgs, and bedrock is likely to be at least 16 meters below this depth. Therefore, bedrock was not encountered during drilling, not expected within one meter of additional depth, and not expected to be impacted as a result of this release.

(3)(a)(4) Petroleum product that is not in the dissolved phase is present with a thickness of 0.01 feet or more, and verified by more than 1 sampling event.

This environmental factor addresses the presence of liquid phase petroleum product in groundwater at the site. The groundwater monitoring and sampling reports present the findings of the groundwater investigation at the site. There was no liquid phase petroleum product identified in any monitoring wells at the site.

(3)(a)(5) Documented contamination discharges to a surface water or wetland.

The Site Evaluation for Case Closure report includes a thorough review of all potential local receptors of contamination. There were no sensitive ecosystems or habitats, and no federally listed endangered species are on or adjacent to the site. There were no wetlands and no outstanding resource waters near the site. Although the Menomonee River is located approximately ~ mile west of the site, and Lake Michigan is approximately 3


I

Site evaluation for Case Closure- Attachment 2 Ameritech Facility- 845 North 35th Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin

miles east ofthe site, there is little chance that impacts from the site would reach either of these locations.

(3)(b) Presence of Environmental Factors:

Since the Ameritech site did not exhibit any of the environmental factors listed in Comm 47.337 (3)(a) above, a discussion of site conditions with regard to this section is not relevant.

(3)(c) Absence of Environmental Factor:

Since the Ameritech site did not exhibit any Environmental Factors listed in Comm 47.337 (3)(a) or (b), as indicated above, and since residual contamination remains at the site, the site conditions were evaluated within the regulatory framework outlined in Comm 46. The results of that evaluation are presented in the sections below.

2. Risk Criteria for Screening Sites

The risk assessment criteria cited in Comm 46.06 (2)(a-h), and discussed below, are used by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) and Wisconsin Department of Commerce (Comm) to measure the environmental, public health, safety, and welfare risks associated with the discharge of petroleum products from a site. This information is also used to determine whether additional remedial activities are required at a site. The existing site conditions are summarized below.

Under Comm 46.06 (2), and 46.07 the following risk criteria are considered for site screening:

(a) None of the environmental factors listed in s. Comm 47.337(3) are present at the site at the time of the completion of the investigation.

The site contains no existing environmental factors that are outlined in Comm 47.337(3).

(b) There is no contaminant concentration in any groundwater that has migrated outside of the property boundary, of the property where the source of the contamination is or was located, that is equal to or greater than enforcement standards, except in a public road or street right of way.

The UST removed form the site was the source of the release. The source has been identified and corrected, and no known additional source areas are located on the site. The contaminant impacts at the site are minimal, and the concentrations in groundwater have consistently declined throughout the project history. The contaminants have been defined within the site boundary, and there is no evidence suggesting that contaminants have migrated away from the investigation area, or off the site.

(c) No soil contamination exists within 4 feet of the ground surface that exceeds the direct contact soil concentrations listed in [COMM 46.06] Table 1.

T N & Associates, Inc. RemediaiAitematives.doc Page3

I

Site evaluation for Case Closure - Attachment 2 Ameritech Facility- 845 North 35th Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin

There were no concentrations of any compounds that exceeded the values outlined in Comm 46.06, Table 1. On September 16, 1992, soil samples were collected from boring SB-2. Toluene was identified in these samples at concentrations of2 ug/kg (7-9 feet bgs) and 3 ug/kg (11-13 feet bgs). Ethylbenzene and xylene were also identified at 11-13 feet bgs at concentrations of 4 ug/kg and 11 ug/kg. In Comm 46.06, Table 1, the direct contact soil concentrations for toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene were 670 mg/kg, 400 mg/kg, and 470 mg/kg, respectively.

(d) No groundwater contamination, in a water sample collected from a monitoring well in low permeability material, which has been identified using the methods specified in s. COMM 46.05, exceeds the groundwater concentrations listed in Table 1.

There was no groundwater concentration in any water sample collected from the site monitoring wells that exceeded the values outlined in Table 1. The presence of low permeability soils at the site is evidenced by soil log data from former investigations and by the rapid bail-down and slow recharge rates of the three site monitoring wells. The site soils are generally classified as glacial till, and the January 29, 1993 PSI, Inc. report indicates that the site soils consist of a very stiff to hard silty clay soil that typically exhibit very low permeability characteristics. In addition, TN&A conducted two groundwater sampling events at the site and observed that the wells bailed dry and recharged slowly. Although there was no permeability or hydraulic conductivity testing conducted during the subsurface investigation phase of this project, TN&A believes that there is sufficient data to establish that the monitoring wells are screened within low permeability soils at the site.

(e)(l) There is a vertical separation distance of 5 feet or more between any contaminants contained within low permeability material and any permeable material on the site, or the soil and groundwater contaminant concentrations are decreasing with depth within the low permeability material, and

(e)(2) No concentration of any contaminant in the groundwater contained within permeable material is equal to or greater than an enforcement standard.

The low permeability materials at the site range from tight silty clays to clays. The permeable materials present at the site include varying amounts of interbedded sands and gravels. Soil samples that were collected from boring B 1 on September 16-17, 1992 indicate 74 ug/kg ofbenzo(a)pyrene at a depth of6.5 feet to 8.5 feet bgs. The B1 boring log indicates that brown sand is present from approximately 1 foot to 3.5 feet bgs. Soil samples collected from boring B4 indicate 30 ug/kg ofbenzo(a)pyrene at a depth of 13 feet to 15 feet bgs and a concentration of230 ug/kg at a depth of23 feet to 25 feet bgs. The B4 boring log indicates that interbedded brown sand and gravel (with some silt) is present from approximately 17 feet to 25 feet bgs (the end ofboring).

T N & Associates, Inc. RemediaiAitematives.doc Page4

I

Site evaluation for Case Closure -Attachment 2 Ameritech Facility- 845 North 35th Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Both ofthese borings have PAH impacted soil that is within 5 vertical feet of permeable soil. The laboratory data from boring B 1 suggests that the P AH concentration decreases with depth in low permeability material. At soil boring B4, however, the soil contaminant concentrations indicate an increase with depth into permeable material. Since the water table at the site is approximately 16 feet bgs, and since a soil sample was collected from the 23 feet to 25 feet bgs interval, it appears that this sample was collected from soil below the water table. Groundwater samples collected from the site monitoring wells do not contain significantly high P AH concentrations.

TN&A believes that there are no enforcement standard exceedances in groundwater contained within permeable material because the site monitoring wells are screened in low permeability soil. Although there are minor enforcement standard exceedances of the P AH compound benzo(a)pyrene in groundwater, the groundwater contaminants demonstrate declining concentrations since October 1992.

(f) There is no impact to a water line or sewer line trench or other utility corridor along which vapors, free product or contaminated water may flow, or an interbedded permeable soil layer, and there is no impact or evidence of imminent impact to a basement:

An underground utility corridor on the site contains the site electric power lines, telephone lines, municipal water, and hot water/ heat supply. These utilities enter the site from the Wells Street right-of-way, to the south, and enter the main site building from the south side. The utility corridor is an underground corridor or vault extending from just below the ground surface to approximately 10 feet deep. The corridor connects the basements of the two buildings on site, and is large enough for a person to walk through. There have been no reports of petroleum fumes or odors in this corridor or in the basements of either building. There are two sewer lines for the main building on site. The sewers extend to Kilbourn Street to the north and to 3ih Street to the west. Neither of these locations is close to the former UST investigation area. The potential for contaminant migration on the site is expected to be minimal, due to the relatively low concentrations of petroleum impacts identified on site, the expected migration distances, and the low permeability of soils present on site.

In addition, the site is covered with asphalt and maintained as a parking lot for the facility. The potential for direct contact/human ingestion or whatever is minimized because of the asphalt parking lot.

(g) There is no enforcement standard exceedance in any groundwater within 1,000 feet of a public well: and

(h) There is no enforcement standard exceedance in any groundwater within 1000 feet of a private well.

The City of Milwaukee is supplied by a municipal water supply originating from Lake Michigan. There are no public wells within 1,000 feet of the site. WDNR well reports

T N & Associates, Inc. RemediaiAiternatives.doc PageS

I

Site evaluation for Case Closure -Attachment 2 Ameritech Facility- 845 North 35th Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin

identified three private wells in the area, however, one of these wells is abandoned, and none are within 1,000 feet ofthe site.

The groundwater samples collected from the site monitoring wells were analytically tested for aqueous-phase petroleum and PAH contaminants, and the analytical tests identified minor enforcement standard exceedances ofthe P AH compound benzo(a)pyrene in groundwater. However, a review of the groundwater sampling analytical data from the site clearly indicates a declining trend in concentration levels since October of 1992. The contaminant plume is shrinking and there is no reason to believe that contaminants have migrated off the property.

CONCLUSION

The Ameritech site is currently used as a billing center, and Ameritech expects to retain ownership ofthe site. With regard to the regulatory requirements for closure, the site does not contain any of the Environmental Factors of Concern that are outlined in COMM 47.337(3)(a-d). The contaminant plume is defined within the property boundary of the site, and is not likely to migrate off the site. There was no liquid phase petroleum product identified in any monitoring wells at the site, and there are no public or private wells that are potential receptors of any residual contamination remaining at the site. The source of the petroleum release at the site was removed, and future releases at the site are not anticipated.

The site has conditions listed under COMM 46.06 (2)(e)(l) and (2)(e)(2). Specifically, 46.06 (2)( e )(1 ), requires a vertical separation distance of 5 feet or more between any contaminants contained within low permeability material and any permeable material on the site, or that the soil and groundwater contaminant concentrations are decreasing with depth within the low permeability material. The site contains petroleum-impacted soil that is present within 5 vertical feet of permeable soil at boring locations B 1 and B4.

The laboratory data from boring B 1 suggests that the P AH concentration decreases with depth into low permeability material and that no regulatory exceedances were present in the soil sample collected from the deeper interval of the same boring. The soil contaminant concentrations at B4 indicate an increase with depth into permeable material. However, this soil sample originates from below the water table at a depth of 23 feet to 25 feet, and groundwater sample results from the site monitoring wells indicate minor and decreasing impact concentrations.

The criteria specified under COMM 46.06 (2)(e)(2) states that no concentration of any contaminant in the groundwater contained within permeable material is equal to or greater than a an enforcement standard. Although very slight enforcement standard exceedances are present in groundwater samples collected form the site, these sample concentrations show decreasing trends. This condition indicates that natural attenuation is affecting the site, shrinking the contaminant plume, and continuing to lower the P AH concentrations in groundwater. TN&A has observed significant decreases in the P AH groundwater concentrations over the last two sampling events, and believes that this trend will continue. As a result, TN&A is expecting the site to achieve the NR140 groundwater standards within a reasonably short period oftime.


I

Site evaluation for Case Closure- Attachment 2 Ameritech Facility- 845 North 35th Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin

The soil and groundwater impacts have been delineated on the site, and there is no soil or groundwater contamination that migrates, or is expected to migrate, offthe site. The permeable materials present at the site range from sandy silts to varying amounts of sands and gravels. The low permeability materials range from silty clays to tight clays. Although one groundwater sample collected from the site has a very slight enforcement standard exceedance, groundwater impacts are showing declining concentrations. In addition, the minimal impacts are not considered to be a threat to the potential environmental, public health, safety, and welfare risks normally associated with more extensive petroleum discharges. Since the investigation was conducted in general accordance with NR 716 and the site conditions satisfy the requirements of in NR 726, no other remedial actions are necessary or recommended.

The site has some residual soil contamination near the former UST location of the site and minor enforcement standard exceedances in groundwater. Removal of the soil is impracticable because ofthe low PAR concentrations and because the PAR compounds are relatively immobile and not expected to migrate from the site. The concentrations identified in groundwater samples show historically declining trends and are expected to attain NR140 groundwater standards within a reasonably short period of time. TN&A is therefore requesting that site closure be granted under COMM 46.07 (c), and WDNR PUBL RR-606 (3)(b) with a groundwater use restriction and monitoring well abandonment. In the event that additional remedial alternatives and a limited site remediation are required, a Remedial Action Plan would be developed that outlines the most cost effective remedial approach. The associated remedial cost details would also be provided.

REFERENCES

PSI, 1992, Phase III Contamination Assessment, New Berlin, WI.

PSI, 1993, Site Contamination Assessment, New Berlin, WI.

PSI, 1994, Underground Storage Tank Wisconsin Bell Billing Center, New Berlin, WI.

PSI, 1995, Monitoring Well Sampling and Analyses Wisconsin Bell Billing Center, New Berlin, WI.

PSI, 1998, Quarterly Monitoring Proposal Wisconsin Bell Billing Center, New Berlin, WI.

PSI, 1998, Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Wisconsin Bell Billing Center, New Berlin, WI.

TN&A, 1999, Groundwater Monitoring Results and Site Evaluation for Case Closure, Ameritech Facility, 845 North 35th Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

Washington, Methew, WDNR, June 2000, Telephone Conversation

WDNR, 1993, Underground Storage Tank Located at the Wisconsin Bell Billing Center 845 N. 35th Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.


I

Site evaluation for Case Closure - Attachment 2 Ameritech Facility - 845 North 35th Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin

WDNR, 1994, " ... recommendation of additional groundwater monitoring. " Milwaukee, WI.

WDNR, 1995, Petroleum Contamination at Wisconsin Bell Facility, 845 N. 35th Street, Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI.

WDNR, 1995, Investigation and Remediation of Environmental Contamination, Chapters NR 700-749 Wisconsin Administrative Code (subsequently updated).

WDNR, 1996, Groundwater Quality, Chapter NR 140 Wisconsin Administrative Code.

WDNR, March 1997, Interim Guidance for Selection ofNatural Attenuation for Groundwater Restoration and Case Closure Under Section NR 726.05(2)(b). PUBL RR-528-97.

WDNR. 1997. Wisconsin Administrative Code. Chapter NR 726 Case Closure. Register No. 494.

WDNR. 1998. Close Out Guidance on the Use of Deed and Groundwater Use Restrictions and Deed Notices. Remediation and Redevelopment Program. PUBL-RR-606. Madison, Wisconsin.

WDNR. 1998. Wisconsin Administrative Code. Chapter Comm 47 Petroleum Environmental Cleanup Fund. Register No. 516.

WDNR. 1999. Wisconsin Administrative Code. Chapter Comm 46 Petroleum Environmental Cleanup Fund Interagency Responsibilities.

WDNR, June 2000, Telephone Conversation: Discussed Closure Procedures and TN&A Requested Local Well Logs. Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

T N & Associates, Inc. RemediaiAiternatives.doc Page 8

State of Wisconsin \ DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

George E. Meyer Secretary

November 9, 1995

Mr. Jeff Haas Wisconsin Bell N 17 W24300 Riverwood Drive First Floor Waukesha, WI 53188

Southeast District - Annex Building 4041 N. Richards Street

P.O. Box 12436 Milwaukee, WI 53212

TELEPHONE 414-229-0800 TELEFAX 414-229-0810

FID #: 241317670 ERR/LUST

SUBJECT: Petroleum Contamination at Wisconsin Bell Facility, 845 N. 35th Street, Milwaukee

Dear Mr. Haas:

In response to your consultants request for site closure, I have reviewed our file on the 6000 gallon underground fuel oil tank, which was closed by removal from this facility in August, 1992. The Department is not able to consider closure for this site at this time because groundwater contamination, over the WDNR enforcement standards has been identified at MW-1. Please direct your consultant to implement one of the following:

1) Remediate the remaining contaminated soil to WDNR soil cleanup standards and then reassess groundwater quality, or:

2) If the remaining contaminated soil is inaccessible, please continue to monitor groundwater quality. Sampling should be for petroleum volatile organic compounds (PVOC) plus any previously detected compounds. In this case, polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) were identified in samples from MW-1. In addition, diesel range organics (DRO) have been identified in some wells during the previous sampling round in 1992. Sample results should be below the WDNR preventative action level for two consecutive quarterly sampling rounds before seeking site closure. You should also evaluate the possibility of petroleum vapors entering the building. Please describe the building nearest the location of the tank bed. Is there a basement, drain tile system or sump in that area?

Your next submittal should include documentation showing the proper disposal of the tank sludge, the fiberglass tank and associated piping.

The Department appreciates the efforts you are taking to restore the environment at this location. Please send all information and correspondence to Giselle Red, LUST Program

Mr. Jeff Haas- November 9, 1995

Assistant at the letterhead address. Feel free to contact me at (414) 229-0836 if you have any questions about this letter.

Sincerely,

~<-.-//~-Carol A. Hefferan Hydrogeologist Leaking Underground Storage Tank Program

cc: David Lyshek- PSI, 16601 W. Dakota Street, New Berlin, WI 53151 SED - Case File #2600

2.

October 3, 1995

Mr. JeffHass Wisconsin Bell N17 W24300 Riverwood Drive 1 st Floor Waukesha Wisconsin 53188

Re: Monitoring Well Sampling and Analyses Wisconsin Bell Billing Center 845 North 35th Street Milwaukee, Wisconsin WDNR Ref: 4400-2600 PSI file No.: 055-5H001

Dear Mr.Hass:

CT 0 6 19Q5

In accordance with our agreement dated March 10, 1995, PSI has performed environmental consulting services for the above referenced site.

It is understood that in a letter prepared by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR), they have requested that the three monitoring wells at the site be sampled for Diesel Range Organics (DRO), Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) and Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (P AHs). In addition, they requested comment on P AHs observed in the soil borings conducted on the subject site. The following is a response to this letter.

Scope of Services

The following services were performed:

• Purge the three monitoring wells existing at this site. • Sample and analyze the three monitoring wells for DRO, VOCs, and P AHs. Sample

monitoring well MW-2 for a duplicate to be analyzed for DRO, VOCs, and PAHs. Sample one field blank and analyze for DRO, VOCs, and P AHs. Analyze one trip blank for VOCs.

• Review and evaluate the laboratory results and write a response to the WDNR letter dated October 3, 1994.

Information To Build On PSI • 16601 West Dakota Street • New Berlin, WI 53151 • Phone 414/641-0911 • Fax 414/641-0918

PSI Project No.: 055-5HOO 1 Page2

Previous Groundwater Analyses

Chemical analyses was performed on groundwater samples obtained from monitroing wells MW-2 and MW-3 during October of 1992. No sample was obtained from MW-1 which was dry at the time. The groundwater samples were analyzed for DRO, VOC, and P AHs. The chemical analyses revealed detectable concentrations of analytes in samples obtained from both monitoring wells and the field blank.

DRO was detected at a concentration of 0.16 Jlg!L in MW-3. Acetone, a common laboratory contaminant, was detected in MW-3 at a concentration estimated to be 2 Jlgl and was also detected in the field blank.

Methylene Chloride, another common laboratory contaminant, was detected in MW-3 at a concentration estimated to be 1 Jlg/L and was also detected in the method blank. Acetone was detected in MW-3 at a concentration estimated to be 3 Jlg/L and was also detected in the field blank.

The following table summarizes the analytical results for those analytes which were detected in the samples collected from the monitoring wells during October, 1992. For comparative purposes, the ES and PAL have been included. Constituents with detectable concentrations have been highlighted in bold print and constituents detected above the ES or PAL have been shaded.

TABLE I October, 1992

Groundwater Analyses (Jlg/1) Wisconsin Bell Billing Center

.)\.n:itlyt¢••••• > ••••·••••••••••·•<••••••• •••••)/l\fW+2•\ .·. (L\1W2? ??• }i'ieldBlank. ./i••·(<•))ES>··••••••••·•••••·•·•••• ·•><•·••••:eALU•/ Acetone 3J 2J 9J 1,000 200 2-Butanone <10 <10 20 Methylene Chloride lBJ <5.0 <5.0 150 15 Toluene <5.0 <5.0 2J 343 68.6 1,1, 1-Trichloroethane <5.0 <5.0 22 0.6 0.06

DRO <100 160.0 <100

Quality Assurance/Quality Control

All sampling, analysis and decontamination procedures were performed in general accordance with WDNR approved methodology. The testing methods are described in the PSI environmental analytical quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) program. This program is in compliance with various environmental regulatory agency policies and guidelines. Field procedures are described in the PSI Technical Guidance.

I

PSI Project No.: 055-5H001 Page 3

Field quality control included the collection of a field blank, trip blank, and duplicate samples during the on-site sampling. The results from this sampling can be found in Appendix A, Analytical Reports.

Groundwater Testing

Groundwater samples were collected from the three (3) monitoring wells. The groundwater samples were analyzed for DRO,VOC, and PAHs. The following table summarizes the groundwater analyte methods performed:

TABLE2 Groundwater Chemical Analyses Program

Wisconsin Bell Billin Center

Wisconsin Modified DRO

For all groundwater sampling events, trip blanks were issued by NET and field blanks and duplicate samples were collected.

Field Operations

On August 1, 1995, monitoring wells MW-1, MW-2 and MW-3 were purged and sampled with new disposable bailers which were subsequently designated to their respective well. Specific well development logs are shown on the monitoring well development forms in Appendix B.

Groundwater samples were transferred to laboratory-supplied glass sample containers. The appropriate type and amount of preservatives were used. The sample containers were labeled, placed in a cooler, packed with ice and transported under chain-of-custody to NET for analysis.

The field blank was collected from the bailer designated to MW -1. Prior to collecting the field blank, the bailer was decontaminated with an Alconox distilled water wash followed by a distilled water rinse. The duplicate sample was collected from MW-2. The trip blank was provided by NET.

Groundwater elevations were taken at each groundwater monitoring point by PSI personnel using a Solinist model 16003 water level indicator. The water level indicator was decontaminated prior to on-site use and between each measurement. All down-well extensions were decontaminated with an Alconox distilled water wash followed by a distilled water rinse. Water level elevations were measured from the north side on the top of the casing at each groundwater monitoring point. Groundwater elevations are listed and attached as Table I.

I

PSI Project No.: 055-5HOO 1 Page4

Discussion of Results

The WDNR has established Groundwater Quality Standards in chapter NR 140 of the Wisconsin Administrative Code. Two guideline concentrations, the Enforcement Standard (ES) and the Preventative Action Limit (PAL) have been established for substances of public health and welfare concern. The ES represents the concentration which typically requires action to improve the quality of groundwater and is typically referenced when remedial action or additional studies are waranted. The PAL represents a lower concentration which typically requires monitoring of the groundwater quality for change.

PAR, Benzo (a) pyrene, was the only analyte detected which is governed by the PAL andES. It was detected at a concentration of 0.35 Jlg/1. The WDNR has set the ES at 0.003 Jlg/l and the PAL at 0.0003 Jlg/1 for this constituent .. A number of other PARs with no WDNR·groundwater quality standards were also detected in monitoring well MW -1. The detectable concentrations ranged between 0.28 and 1.4 Jlg/1. No PARs were detected in any of the other monitoring wells.

No VOCs or DRO concentrations were detected in any of the monitoring wells.

The following table summarizes the analytical results for those analytes which were detected in the samples collected from the monitoring wells on August 1, 1995. For comparative purposes, the ES and PAL have been included. Constituents with detectable concentrations have been highlighted in bold print and constituents detected above the ES or PAL have been shaded.

TABLE3 August 1, 1995

Groundwater Analyses (Jlg/1) Wisconsin Bell Center

The groundwater measurements obtained on August 25, 1995, revealed static groundwater elevations of 674.16 MSL at MW-1, 674.71 MSL at MW-2, 674.90 MSL at MW-3. the ~easurements along with previoulsy measuremnts have been tabulated and attached as Table I.

PSI Project No.: 055-5H001 Page 5

Based on these measured static groundwater elevations, the estimated groundwater flow is to the north northeast. However, groundwater elevations and flow can vary seasonally. In addition, this observation should not be considered definitive due to the limited data and relatively short distance between wells.

Based on the USGS Water-Table Map of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, the water table in the vicinity of the subject site is 590 MSL or approximately 100 feet below ground surface. This water table map depicts the regional groundwater level in the upper aquifer. Groundwater elevations were obtained from wells screened in the unconsolidated deposits overlying bedrock or bedrock immediately underlying the unconsolidated deposits.

P AHs Observed in Soil Borings

A number ofPAH compounds were detected at low concentrations in the soil borings. The WDNR has not established cleanup guidelines for these compounds in soil. With the exception of naphthalene, P AH compounds are generally only of concern for direct contact due to their relatively low migration potential. The subject site and surrounding properties are developed with commercial or industrial opperations whose ground surface is covered with buildings, asphalt or concrete. For these reasons I believe that these low concentrations of P AHs are not significant.

Conclusions and Recomendations

Based on the results of the groundwater analyses, it appears that the groundwater has not been significantly impacted due to the prior tank release and infact the groundwater conditions have improved since the October, 1992 sampling event. Considering that this site and general vicinity is serviced by all major utilities including water and that the upper aquifer is approximately 100 feet below the ground surface, it appears that the perched groundwater has not been impacted to the degree to adversely affect public health and welfare. Due to the low concentrations of analytes detected and the site characteristics, the WDNR may consider case closure on a sitespecific basis.

PSI recommends no further action at this time. However, final disposition will be directed by the WDNR. In addition, PSI recommends that the remaining groundwater monitoring wells be abandoned in accordance with NR 141.

Warranty

The field observations, measurements, and research reported herein are considered sufficient in detail and scope to form a reasonable basis for additional groundwater monitoring of this property. The assessment, conclusions, and recommendations presented herein are based upon the subjective evaluation of limited data. They may not represent all conditions at the subject site as they reflect the information gathered from specific locations. PSI warrants that the findings and conclusions contained herein have been promulgated in accordance with generally accepted environmental investigation methodology and only for the site described in this report.

PSI Project No.: 055-5HOOI Page 6

The additional groundwater monitoring has been developed to provide the client with information regarding apparent indications of recog.nized environmental conditions relating to the subject property. It is necessarily limited to the conditions observed and to the information available at the time of the work. Due to the limited nature of the work, there is a possibility that there may exist conditions which could not be identified within the scope of the assessment or which were not apparent at the time of report preparation. It is also possible that the testing methods employed at the time of the report may later be superseded by other methods. The description, type, and composition of what are commonly referred to as "hazardous materials or conditions" can also change over time. PSI does not accept responsibility for changes in the state of the art, nor for changes in the scope of various lists of hazardous materials or conditions. PSI believes that the findings and conclusions provided in this report are reasonable. However, no other warranties are implied or expressed.

PSI appreciates the opportunity to have worked with you on this UST closure. If you have any questions, feel free to call us at 414/641-0911.

Respectfully submitted,

PSI

David C. Lyshek Staff Engineer

DCL/cas cc: WDNR

Attachments: Appendix A AppendixB Appendix C Table I

Analytical Results Well Development Forms Site Plan Groundwater Elevations

I

Appendix A Analytical Report

NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL

®TESTING, INC.

Watertown Division 602 Commerce Drive P.O. Box 288 Watertown, WI 53094

Tel : (4 14) 261-1660 Fax: (414) 261-81 20

ANALYTICAL AND QUALITY CONTROL REPORT

Mr. Dave Lyshek PSI

08/18/1995

16601 W. Dakota Street New Berlin, WI 53151 Job No: 95.05315

Enclosed are the Analytical and Quality Control reports for the following samples submitted for analysis:

Sample Date Date Number Sample Description Taken Received

14 3980 MW - 1 #055-5H001 08/01/1995 08/02/1995 143981 Field Blk #055-5H001 08/01/1995 08/02/1995 14 3982 MW-2 #055-5H001 08/01/1995 08/02/1995 143983 Duplicate #055-5H001 08/01/1995 08/02/1995 143984 MW-3 #055-5H001 08/01/1995 08/02/1995 143985 Trip #055-5H001 08/01/1995 08/02/1995

The above sample(s) may have a result flag shown on the report. The following are the result flag definitions:

A c = E = G = I L p

s X =

-~alyzed past hold time B = Blank is contaminated Standard outside of control limits D Diluted for analysis Extracted past hold time F Sample filtered in lab Received past hold time H = Late eluting hydrocarbons present Improperly handled sample J = Estimated concentration Common lab solvent and contaminant M Matrix interference Impr operly preserved sample Q Result confirmed via re - analysis Sediment present T = Does not match typical pattern

Unidentified compound lsi pre:.:; l!-~

~n D. ~~ Organic Operations Manager Certification No. 128053530


®TESTING, INC.


Tel: (414) 261-1660 Fax: (414) 261-8120

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Mr. Dave Lyshek PSI 16601 W. Dakota Street New Berlin, WI 53151

JOB DESCRIPTION: Ameritech #055-5H001 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Ground Water Analysis SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: MW-1 #055-5H001

Recv'd On Ice

08/18/1995 Job No: 95.05315 Sample No: 143980 Account No: 55670 Page 2

Date Taken: 08/01/1995 13:35 Date Received: 08/02/1995 .

Parameter Results Units Reporting

Limit Method Date

Analyzed Prep/Run Batch

RO Extraction OC - AQUEOUS EPA 8021 enzene

_ romobenzene Bromochloromethane

iromodichloromethane romoform romomethane

n-Butylbenzene ~ec-Butylbenzene

ert-Butylbenzene arbon Tetrachloride

Chlorobenzene -::~hl orodibromome thane

hloroethane Chloroform _hloromethane · - Chlorotoluene ~1-Chlorotoluene

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane ~ ,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)

-P ibromomethane ,2-Dichlorobenzene

1 , 3-Dichlorobenzene ,4-Dichlorobenzene ichlorodifluoromethane

~, 1-Dichloroethane

1,2-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene cis-1,2-Dichloroethene trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1,2-Dichloropropane 1, 3-Dichloropropa.ne 2,2-Dichloropropane 1,1-Dichloropropene cis-1,3-Dichloropropene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene

08/03/95

<1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <2.0 <4.0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <4.0 <1. 0 <4.0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <2.0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1.0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <3.0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <2.0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0

ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L

1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 4.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 1.0 2 . 0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 3 . 0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0

WDNR

S-8021 S-8021 8-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 8-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 8-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 8-8021 S-8021 S-8021

08/03/1995 521

08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995

. 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995

1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 14 85 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485


®TESTING, INC.

Watertown Div ision 602 Commerce Drive P. O. Box 288 Watertown, WI 53094


ANALYTICAL REPORT

08/18/1995

Tel : (414) 261-1 660 Fax: (414) 261 -81 20

Job No: 95.05315 Sample No: 143980 Account No: 55670 Page 3


Recv'd On Ice

Date Taken: 08/01/1995 13:35 Date Received: 08/02/1995

Parameter

l hylbenzene r xachlorobutadiene :sopropylbenzene

Isopropyl toluene Methylene Chloride

phtha1ene -Propylbenzene tyrene

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane , 1 , 2,2-Tetrachloroethane r trachloroethene bluene

1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ,1,1-Trichloroethane ,1,2-Trichloroethane richloroethene richlorofluoromethane ,2,3-Trichloropropane

1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene , 3,5-Trimethylbenzene inyl Chloride ylenes, Total

Methyl-t-butyl ether urr: Bromofluorobenzene RO - AQUEOUS NA Extraction

•NA METHOD 8 31 0 - AQUEOUS .cenaphthene cenaphthylene thracene

enzo(a)anthracene _ enzo(b)fluoranthene Benzo(k)fluoranthene . enzo(a)py rene

• I ' t ... .., ~

enzo(ghi)pery lene

Results

<1. 0 <2.0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <5.0 <1.0 <1. 0 <1.0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <4.0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <3.0 <3.0 <1. 0 88.9 <0.10 08/04/95

<1.0 <2.0 <0.20 0 . 33 <0.050 0 . 28 0.35 --l 0.68

rs -lb (). ;)

Units

ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L % mg/L

ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L

Reporting Limit Method

1. 0 S-8021 2.0 S-8021 1. 0 S-8021 1. 0 S-8021 5.0 S-8021 1. 0 S-8021 1. 0 S-8021 1. 0 S-8021 1.0 S-8021 1. 0 S-8021 1. 0 S-8021 1.0 S-8021 1. 0 S-8021 1.0 S-8021 1. 0 S-8021 1. 0 S-8021 1. 0 S-8021 4.0 S-8021 1. 0 S-8021 1.0 S-8021 1. 0 S-8021 3.0 S-8021 3.0 S-8021 1.0 S - 8021 n/a S-8021 0.10 WDNR

1.0 2.0 0.20 0.050 0.050 0.050 0.20 0.10

S-3510

S-8310 S-8310 S-8310 S-8310 S-8310 S-8310 S-8310 S-8310

Date Analyzed

08/14/B95 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/09/1995 08/04/1995

08/11/1995 08/11/1995 08/11/1995 08/11/1995 08/11/1995 08/11/1995 08/11/1995 08/11/1995

Prep/Run Batch

1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485

. 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485

521 746 330

330 513 330 513 330 513 330 513 330 513 330 513 330 513 330 513


®TESTING, INC.


Tel : (414) 261-1 660 Fax: (414) 261-81 20

WDNR No 128053530

ANALYTICAL REPORT


JOB DESCRIPTION : Ameritech #055-5H001 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Ground Water Analysis SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: MW-1 #055-5H001

Recv'd On Ice

Date Taken: 08/01/1995 13:35 Date


Received: 08/02/1995

Reporting Date Prep/Run Parameter Results Units Limit Method Analyzed Batch

PNA METHOD 8310 - AQUEOUS hrysene 0 .4 9 ug/L 0.10 S-8310 08/11/1995 330 513

Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene <0 . 10 ug/L 0.10 S-8310 08/11/1995 330 513 luoranthene ""! 1.4 ug/L 0.20 S-8310 08/11/1995 330 513 luorene ' ~ <0.40 ug/L 0 .4 0 S-8310 08/11/1995 330 513

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene I_"~_(

0 .41 ug/L 0.10 S-8310 08/11/1995 330 513 ., aphthalene <1. 0 ug/L 1.0 S-8310 08/11/1995 330 513 henanthrene

~-0.65 ug/L 0 .4 0 S-8310 08/11/1995 330 513

yrene 0.97 ug/L 0.20 S-8310 08/11/1995 330 513 Surr: 2-Fluorobipheny l 68.5 % n/a S-8310 08/11/1995 330 513


®TESTING, INC.

Watertown Division 602 Commerce Drive P.O. Box 288 Watertown, WI 53094 Tel : (414) 261-1 660 Fax: {414) 261-8120 WDNB No. 1280535 30

ANALYTICAL REPORT


JOB DESCRIPTION: Ameritech #055-5H001 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Ground Water Analysis SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: Field Blk #055-5H001

Recv'd On Ice

08/18/1995 Job No : 95.05315 Sample No: 143981 Account No: 55670 Page 5

Date Taken: 08/01/1995 13:45 Date Received : 08/02/1995

Parameter Results Reporting

Units Limit Method Date Prep/Run

Analyzed Batch

RO Extraction VOC - AQUEOUS - EPA 8021

enzene romobenzene

Bromochloromethane romodichloromethane romoform romomethane

n-Buty lbenzene ec-Butylbenzene ert-Buty lbenzene ~rbon Tetrachloride

Chlorobenzene :hlorodibromomethane :hloroethane 'hloroform

<;hloromethane 1 -Chlorotoluene _,- Chlorotol uene 1,2-Di bromo-3-Chloropropane . , 2-Dibromoethane (EDB) >ibromome thane

_ , 2 -Dichlorobenzene 1 , 3-Dichlorobenzene

,4-Dichlorobenzene ichlorodifluoromethane ,1-Dichloroethane

1 ,2-Dichloroe thane , 1-Di chloroethene

~ is-1,2-Dichloroethene

rans-1, 2 -Dichloroethene f, 2 - Di chloropropane ~ , 3 - Dichloropropane

_ , 2 -Dichloropropane 1 , 1-Dichloropropene pis - 1 , 3-Dichloropropene ~rans - 1 , 3-Dichloropropene

08/03/95

<1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <2.0 <4 . 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1 . 0 <4 . 0 <1. 0 <4.0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <2.0 <1.0 <1. 0 <1.0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <3 . 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <2 . 0 <1 . 0 <1. 0 <1.0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0


1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 4.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0

WDNR

8-8021 S-8021 8-8021 S-8021 8-8021 8-8021 8 - 8021 S-8021 8-8021 8-8021 S-8021 8-8021 8-8021 8-8021 8-8021 S-8021 8-8021 8-8021 8-8021 8-8021 S-8021 S-8021 8-8021 8-8021 8-8021 S-8021 8-80 21 S-8021 8-80 2 1 8-8021 8-802 1 8-8021 8-8021 8-8021 S-8021

08/03/1995 521

08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/1 5/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995

1485 1485 1485 1485 1 4 85 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 148 5 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 14 85 1485 1485 1485 1485


®TESTING, INC.


Tel: (414) 261-1 660 Fax: (41 4) 261-8120

ANALYTICAL REPORT


08/18/1995 Job No: 95 . 05315 Sample No: 143981 Account No: 55670 Page 6

JOB DESCRIPTION: Ameritech #055-5H001 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Ground Water Analysis SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: Field Blk #055-5H001

Recv'd On Ice

Date Taken: 08/01/1995 13:45

Parameter

lthylbenzene Hex achlorobutadiene

sopropylbenzene -Isopropyl toluene

Methy lene Chloride aphthalene -Propy lbenzene tyrene

1 , 1,1,2 - Tetrachloroethane ,1,2,2 - Tetrachloroethane etrachloroethene oluene

1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ,2,4-Trichlor obenzene ,1,1 - Trichloroethane ,1 , 2-Trichloroethane richloroethene richlorofluoromethane ,2,3-Trichloropropane

1, 2 ,4-Trimethy lbenzene ,3,5-Tr imethy lbe nzene

"iny l Chloride _:ylenes, Total Methyl-t-butyl ether urr: Bromofluorobenzene RO - AQUEOUS NA Ex traction

METHOD 8310 - AQUEOUS .cenaphthene cenaphthylene thracene

enzo(a)anthracene enzo(b)fluoranthene

Benzo(k)fluoranthene e nzo(a)py rene e n zo(ghi)pery lene

Results

<1. 0 <2.0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <5.0 <1. 0 <1.0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <4.0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <3.0 <3.0 <1. 0 88.1 <0 . 1 0 08/04/95

<1. 0 <2.0 <0 . 20 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.20 <0.10

Date Received: 08/02/1995

Reporting Units Limit Method

Date Analyzed

Pr ep/Run Batch



1. 0 S-8021 2.0 S-8021 1. 0 S-8021 1.0 S-8021 5 . 0 S-8021 1.0 S-8021 1.0 S - 8021 1.0 S-8021 1.0 S-8021 1.0 S-8021 1.0 S-8021 1.0 S-8021 1.0 S-8021 1.0 S-8021 1. 0 S-8021 1.0 S-8021 1 . 0 S-8021 4.0 S-8021 1 . 0 S-8021 1.0 S-8021 1. 0 S-8021 3.0 S-8021 3.0 S-8021 1. 0 S-8021 n/a S - 8021 0 . 10 WDNR

1.0 2.0 0 . 20 0.050 0.050 0.050 0.20 0.10

S-3510

S-8310 S-8310 S-8310 S-8310 S-8310 S-8310 S-8310 S-8310

08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/09/1995 08/04/1995

1485 14 85 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 14 85 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485 1485

521 746 330

08/11/1995 330 513 08/11/1995 330 513 08/11/1995 330 513 08/11/1995 330 513 08/11/1995 330 513 08/11/1995 330 513 08/11/1995 330 513 08/11/1995 330 513


®TESTING, INC.


Tel : (414)261-1660 Fax: (414) 261-8120

WDNR No 128053530

ANALYTICAL REPORT


JOB DESCRIPTION: Arneritech #055-5H001 PROJECT DESCRIPTION; Ground Water Analysis SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: Field Blk #055-5H001

Recv'd On Ice

Date Taken: 08/01/1995 13:45 Date




PNA METHOD 8310 - AQUEOUS 'hrysene <0.10 ug/L 0.10 S-8310 08/11/B95 330 513

Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene <0.10 ug/L 0 . 10 S-8310 08/11/1995 330 513 - ·l uoran thene <0.20 ug/L 0.20 S-8310 08/11/1995 330 513 - ·luorene <0 .40 ug/L 0.40 S-8310 08/11/1995 330 513 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene <0.10 ug/L 0.10 S-8310 08/11/1995 330 513 Japhthalene <1. 0 ug/L 1.0 S-8310 08/11/1995 330 513 henanthrene <0.40 ug/L 0.40 S-8310 08/11/1995 330 513 yrene <0.20 ug/L 0.20 S-8310 08/11/1995 330 513

Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 97.3 % n/a S-8310 08/11/1995 330 513


®TESTING, INC.


Tel: (414) 261-1660 Fax: (414) 261-8120

ANALYTICAL REPORT



Recv'd On Ice




Limit Method Date


RO Extraction VOC - AQUEOUS - EPA 8021

enzene romobenzene

Bromochloromethane romodichloromethane romoform romomethane

n-Butylbenzene ec-Butylbenzene ert-Butylbenzene arbon Tetrachloride

Chlorobenzene :hlorodibromomethane !hloroethane hloroform

)hloromethane 1-Chlorotoluene -Chlorotoluene

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane

1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB}

1ibromomethane . ,2-Dichlorobenzene

1,3-Dichlorobenzene .,4-Dichlorobenzene 1ichlorodifluoromethane ,1-Dichloroethane

1,2-Dichloroethane

1,1-Dichloroethene is- 1,2-Dichloroethene

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ,2-Dichloropropane ,3-Dichloropropane ,2-Dichloropropane

1,1-Dichloropropene •is-1,3-Dichloropropene rans-1,3-Dichloropropene

08/03/95

<LO <LO <LO <LO <2.0 <4.0 <LO <LO <LO <LO <LO <LO <4-0 <LO <4.0 <LO <LO <2.0 <1.0 <LO <LO <LO <1.0 <3.0 <LO <LO <2.0 <LO <LO <LO <LO <LO <LO <LO <LO


LO LO LO LO 2.0 4.0 LO LO LO 1.0 1.0 LO 4.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 LO 2.0 LO LO 1.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 LO 2.0 1.0 1.0 1 . 0 LO LO 1.0 1.0 1.0

WDNR

S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S - 8021

08/03/1995 521

08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995

1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488


®TESTING, INC.


I Mr. Dave Lyshek PSI 16601 W. Dakota Street New Berlin, WI 53151

ANALYTICAL REPORT

08/18/1995

Tel: (4 14) 261-1660 Fax: {414) 261-8120 WDNR No. 128053530

Job No: 95.05315 Sample No: 143982 Account No: 55670 Page 9

JOB DESCRIPTION: Ameritech #055 - 5H001 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Ground Water Analysis SAMPLE DESCRIPTION : MW-2 #055-5H001

Recv'd On Ice

Date Taken: 08/01/1995 14 : 10

Parameter

thy lbenzene Hexachlorobutadiene

opropylbenzene -Isopropyl toluene

Methy lene Chloride f-Phthalene 1- Propylbenzene

y rene 1,1 , 1 , 2-Tetrachloroethane

1,1,2 , 2-Tetrachloroethane etrachloroethene oluene

1 ,2 ,3-Trichlorobenzene , 2,4-Trichlorobenzene ,1 , 1-Trichloroethane ,1,2-Trichloroethane

Tri chloroethene richlorofluoromethane ,2 , 3 - Trichloropropane

1 ,2 , 4 -Trimethylbenzene

1,3,5-Trimethy lbenzene iny l Chloride y l e n e s , Total

Methyl -t-buty l ether urr : Bromofluorobenzene •RO - AQUEOUS ·NA Ex traction

•NA METHOD 8 310 - AQUEOUS cenaphthene cenaphthylene

Anthracene :enzo (a) anthracene ~enzo{b)flfioranthene

Benzo(k)fluoranthene e n zo(a)py rene en zo(ghi)pery lene

Results

<1.0 <2.0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <5.0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <4.0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <3.0 <3.0 <1. 0 94.0 <0 . 10 08/04/95

<1. 0 <2.0 <0.20 <0 . 050 <0.050 <0.050 <0 . 20 <0 . 10


Units



Reporting Limit

1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 5.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 n/a 0 . 10

1.0 2.0 0.20 0.050 0 . 050 0.050 0.20 0 . 10

Method

S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S - 8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S - 8021 S-802 1 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-802 1 S-8021 S-8021 WDNR S-3510

S-8310 S-8310 S-8310 S-8310 S - 8310 S-8310 S-8310 S-8310

Date Analyzed

08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/09/1995 08/04/1995

08/11/1995 08/11/1995 08/11/1995 08/11/1995 08/11/1995 08/11/1995 08/11/1995 08/11/1995

Prep/Run Batch

1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1 4 88 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1 4 88 1488 1 4 88 1488 1 4 88

. 1 4 88 1488

5 2 1 746 330

330 513 330 5 1 3 330 513 330 513 330 513 330 513 330 513 330 51 3


®TESTING, INC.


Tel: {414) 261 -1660 Fax: (414) 261-8120

ANALYTICAL REPORT


JOB DESCRIPTION: Arneritech #055-5H001 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Ground Water Analysis SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: MW-2 #055-5H001

Recv'd On Ice

Date Taken: 08/01/1995 14:10 Date




PNA METHOD 8310 - AQUEOUS hrysene <0.10 ug/L 0.10 8-8310 08/11/1995 330 513

Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene <0.10 ug/L 0.10 8-8310 08/11/1995 330 513 'luoranthene <0.20 ug/L 0.20 8-8310 08/11/1995 330 513 'luorene <0.40 ug/L 0.40 8-8310 08/11/1995 330 513

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene <0.10 ug/L 0.10 S-8310 08/11/1995 330 513 aphthalene <1.0 ug/L 1.0 8-8310 08/11/1995 330 513 henanthrene <0 .40 ug/L 0.40 8-8310 08/11/1995 330 513 •yrene <0.20 ug/L 0.20 8-8310 08/11/1995 330 513



®TESTING, INC.


Tel : (414) 261-1660 Fax: (414) 261-8120

ANALYTICAL REPORT


JOB DESCRIPTION: Ameritech #055-5H001 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Ground Water Analysis SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: Duplicate #055-5H001

Recv'd On Ice




Limit Method Date


RO Extraction OC - AQUEOUS - EPA 8021 enzene romobenzene

Bromochloromethane ~omodichloromethane

romoform romomethane

n-Butylbenzene ec-Butylbenzene

:ert-Butylbenzene arbon Tetrachloride

Chlorobenzene hlorodibromomethane

-lhloroethane ~hloroform _hloromethane !-Chlorotoluene -Chlorotoluene

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane ,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) ibromomethane ,2-Dichlorobenzene

1,3-Dichlorobenzene ,4-Dichlorobenzene

richlorodifluoromethane ,1-Dichloroethane

1,2-Dichloroethane =L,1-Dichloroethene -~is-1,2-Dichloroethene

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene _l ,2-Dichloropropane _ ,3-Dichloropropane - 2 ,2-Dichloropropane 1,1-Dichloropropene ~is-1,3-Dichloropropene

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene

08/03/95

<1. 0 <1.0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <2.0 <4.0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <4.0 <1. 0 <4.0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <2-0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <3.0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <2.0 <1.0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0


1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 4.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4_0 1.0 4_0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 2_0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0

WDNR

8-8021 8-8021 8-8021 8-8021 8-8021 8-8021 8-8021 8-8021 8-8021 8-8021 8-8021 8-8021 8-8021 8-8021 8-8021 8-8021 8-8021 8-8021 8-8021 8-8021 8-8021 8-8021 8-8021 8-8021 8-8021 8-8021 8-8021 8-8021 8-8021 8-8021 8-8021 8-8021 8-8021 8-8021 8-8021

08/03/1995 521

08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995

1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488


®TESTING, INC.

Watertown Division 602 Commerce Drive P.O. Box 288 Watertown, WI 53094 Tel: (414) 261-1 660 Fax: (4 14) 261 -8120

ANALYTICAL REPORT



JOB DESCRIPTION: Ameritech #055-5H001 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Ground Water Analysis SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: Duplicate #055-5H001

Recv'd On Ice

Date Taken: 08/01/1995 14:20

Parameter

thylbenzene [xachlorobutadiene sopropylbenzene -Isopropyl toluene

Methylene Chloride :Lphthalene 1 Propylbenzene

tyrene 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane

,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane f trachloroethene -oluene

1,2 , 3 - Trichlorobenzene ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ,1,1-Trichloroethane

1,1,2-Trichloroethane richloroethene richlorofluoromethane ,2,3-Trichloropropane

1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ,3,5-Trimethylbenzene inyl Chloride y lenes, Total

Me thy l-t-butyl ether urr: Bromofluorobenzene RO - AQUEOUS NA Ex traction

NA METHOD 8310 - AQUEOUS cenaphthene

Acenaphthylene thracene

enzo(a)anthrac ene enzo(b)fluoranthene

Benzo(k)fluoranthene enzo(a)pyrene enzo(ghi)perylene

Results

<1. 0 <2.0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <5.0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1.0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <4-0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <3.0 <3.0 <1. 0 97 _0 <0.10 08/04/95

<1. 0 <2.0 <0.20 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0-20 <0.10


Units



Reporting Limit

1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 5.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 n/a 0.10

1.0 2.0 0.20 0.050 0.050 0.050 0 . 20 0.10

Method

S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S - 8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 WDNR S-3510

S-8310 S-8310 S-8310 S-8310 S-8310 S-8310 S-8310 S-8310

Date Analyzed

08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/09/1995 08/04/1995

Prep/Run Batch

1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488

521 746 330

08/11/1995 330 513 08/11/1995 330 513 08/11/1995 330 513 08/11/1995 330 513 08/11/1995 330 513 08/11/1995 330 513 08/11/1995 330 513 08/11/1995 330 513


®TESTING, INC.


Tel : (414) 261 -1660 Fax: (414) 261-8120

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Mr . Dave Lyshek PSI 16601 W. Dakota Street New Berlin, WI 53151

JOB DESCRIPTION: Ameritech #055-5H001 PROJECT DESCRI PTION: Ground Water Analysis SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: Duplicate #055 - 5H001

Recv'd On Ice



Reporting Date Prep/Run Parameter Results Units Limit Method Analyzed Batch l PNA METHOD 8310 - AQUEOUS

rysene <0-10 ug/L 0.10 S-8310 08/11/1995 330 513 ibenzo(a,h)anthracene <0-10 ug/L 0.10 S-8310 08/11/1995 330 513 uoranthene <0.20 ug/L 0.20 S-8310 08/11/1995 330 513

luorene <0.40 ug/L 0.40 S-8310 08/11/1995 330 513 Indeno(1,2,3 - cd)pyrene <0.10 ug/L 0 _10 S-8310 08/11/1995 330 513 aphthalene <1. 0 ug/L 1.0 S-8310 08/11/1995 330 513 enanthrene <0.40 ug/L 0.40 S-8310 08/11/1995 330 513

-yrene <0.20 ug/L 0.20 S-8310 08/11/1995 330 513 Surr: 2 - Fluorobipheny l 86 . 9 % n/a S-8310 08/11/1995 330 513


®TESTING, INC.


Tel: (4 14) 261-1 660 Fax: (414) 261-81 20

ANALYTICAL REPORT


JOB DESCRIPTION: Arneritech #055-5H001 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Ground Water Analysis SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: MW-3 #055-5H001

Recv'd On Ice




Limit Method Date


0 Extraction - AQUEOUS - EPA 8021

nzene t"omobenzene

Bromochloromethane r omodichloromethane t"omoform t"Omomethane

n-Buty lbenzene - ec-Butylbenzene

=-rt-Butylbenzene rbon Tetrachloride

Chlorobenzene hlorodibromomethane hloroethane h loroform

loromethane Chlorotoluene

-Chlorotoluene 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane

,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) ibromomethane ,2-Dichlorobenzene

1,3-Dichlorobenzene ,4-Dichlorobenzene

lichlorodifluoromethane ,1-Dichloroethane

1 , 2-Dichloroethane ,1-Dichloroethene is-1,2-Dichlor oethene

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ,2-Dichloropropane ,3-Dichloropropane , 2-Dichloropropane

1,1-Dichloropropene is-1,3-Dichloropropene rans-1,3-Dichloropropene

08/03/95

<1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <2 . 0 <4-0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <4.0 <1.0 <4 . 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <2.0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <3_0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <2-0 <1.0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0


1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2_0 4 . 0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 1 . 0 4 . 0 1.0 1.0 2_0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 3 _0 1.0 1.0 2_0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0

WDNR

S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S - 8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021

08/03/1995 521

08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 . 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995

1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488


®TESTING, INC.

Watertown Division 602 Commerce Drive P.O . Box 288 Watertown, WI 53094 Tel: (414) 261-1660 Fax: (41 4) 261-8120

ANALYTICAL REPORT



Recv'd On Ice



Reporting Date Prep/Run Parameter

thylbenzene ffrxachlorobutadiene lrfopropylbenzene

1 Isopropyltoluene Methylene Chloride

J3.phthalene Lpropylbenzene tyrene

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ~trachloroethene

-bluene 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene

,2,4 -Trichlorobenzene ,1,1-Trichloroethane

1,1,2-Trichloroethane richloroethene richlorofluoromethane ,2,3-Trichloropropane

1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ,3,5-Trimethylbenzene inyl Chloride ylenes, Total

Methyl-t-butyl ether urr : Bromofluorobenzene RO - AQUEOUS NA Extraction

NA METHOD 8310 - AQUEOUS cenaphthene

Acenaphthylene thracene

enzo(a)anthracene •enzo(b)fluoranthene Benzo(k)fluoranthene

enzo(a)pyrene enzo(ghi)perylene

Results

<1. 0 <2. 0 <1.0 <1. 0 <5.0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <4.0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1.0 <3 . 0 <3.0 <1. 0 95.0 <0.10 08/04/95

<1. 0 <2.0 <0.20 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.20 <0.10

Units Limit Method



1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 5.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 n/a 0.10

1.0 2 . 0 0.20 0.050 0.050 0.050 0 . 20 0.10

S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 WDNR S-3510

S-8310 S-8310 S-8310 S-8310 S-8310 S-8310 S-8310 S-8310

Analyzed Batch

08/14/1995 1488 08/14/1995 1488 08/14/1995 1488 08/14/1995 1488 08/14/1995 1488 08/14/1995 1488 08/14/1995 1488 08/14/1995 1488 08/14/1995 1488 08/14/1995 1488 08/14/1995 1488 08/14/1995 1488 08/14/1995 1488 08/14/1995 1488 08/14/1995 1488 08/14/1995 1488 08/14/1995 1488 08/14/1995 1488 08/14/1995 1488 08/14/1995 1488 08/14/1995 1488 08/14/1995 1488 08/14/1995 1488 08/14/1995 1488 08/14/1995 1488 08/09/1995 521 74 6 08/04/1995 330

08/11/1995 330 513 08/11/1995 330 513 08/11/1995 330 513 08/11/1995 330 513 08/11/1995 330 513 08/11/1995 330 513 08/11/1995 330 513 08/11/1995 330 513


®TESTING, INC.


Tel : (414) 261-1660 Fax: (414) 261-8120

ANALYTICAL REPORT



Recv'd On Ice




PNA METHOD 8310 - AQUEOUS C rysene <0.10 ug/L 0.10 S-8310 08/11/1995 330 513 ibenzo(a,h)anthracene <0.10 ug/L 0.10 S-8310 08/11/1995 330 513 uoranthene <0 . 20 ug/L 0.20 S-8310 08/11/1995 330 513 uorene <0 . 40 ug/L 0.40 S-8310 08/11/1995 330 513

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene <0.10 ug/L 0.10 S-8310 08/11/1995 330 513 ~phthalene <1.0 ug/L 1.0 S-8310 08/11/1995 330 513

enanthrene <0.40 ug/L 0.40 S-8310 08/11/1995 330 513 yrene <0.20 ug/L 0.20 S-8310 08/11/1995 330 513


·"'

NATIONAL EN VI RON MENTAL

®TESTING, INC.

Watertown Divis ion 602 Commerce Drive P.O. Box 288 Watertown, WI 53094 Tel: (414) 261 -1660 Fax: (4 14) 261-8120

ANALYTICAL REPORT


JOB DESCRIPTION: Ameritech #055-5H001 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Ground Water Analysis SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: Trip #055-5H001

Recv'd On Ice


Date Taken: 08/01/1995 Date Received: 08/02/1995


Limit Method Date


VOC - AQUEOUS - EPA 8021 enzene romobenzene romochloromethane

Bromodichloromethane

~romoform

romomethane -Butylbenzene

sec-Butylbenzene ert-Butylbenzene ~rbon Tetrachloride hlorobenzene

Chlorodibromomethane hloroethane hloroform

Chloromethane [ -Chlorotoluene 1-Chlorotoluene ,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane

1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) •ibromomethane ,2-Dichlorobenzene ,3-Dichlorobenzene

1,4-Dichlorobenzene 1ichlorodifluoromethane . ,1-Dichloroethane ,2-Dichloroethane ,1-Dichloroethene is-1,2-Dichloroethene

_ rans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1,2-Dichloropropane . ,3-Dichloropropane .,2-Dichloropropane

_ ,1-Dichloropropene cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ~rans-1,3-Dichloropropene

~thylbenzene

<1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <2.0 <4.0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <4.0 <1. 0 <4.0 <1. 0 . <1. 0 <2.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <3.0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <2.0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1.0 <1.0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1. 0 <1.0

ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L

1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 4.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4 . 0 1.0 4.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1 . 0 1.0

S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021 S-8021

08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995 08/14/1995

1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488 1488


®TESTING, INC.


Tel : (414) 261-1660 Fax: (4 14) 261-8120

ANALYTICAL REPORT


JOB DESCRIPTION: Ameritech #055 - 5H001 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Ground Water Analysis SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: Trip #055-5H001

Recv'd On Ice

Date Taken: 08/01/1995 Date




. exachlorobutadiene <2.0 ug/L 2.0 S-8021 08/14/1995 1488 s opropylbenzene <1. 0 ug/L 1.0 S - 8021 08/14/1995 1488 Isopropyl toluene <1.0 ug/L 1.0 S-8021 08/14/1995 1488

.thylene Chloride <5.0 ug/L 5 . 0 S-8021 08/14/1995 1488 'l"aphthalene <1. 0 ug/L 1.0 S-8021 08/14/1995 1488 H Propylbenzene <1. 0 ug/L 1.0 S-8021 08/14/1995 1488

yrene <1. 0 ug/L 1.0 S-8021 08/14/1995 1488 1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <1.0 ug/L 1.0 S-8021 08/14/1995 1488

1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <1. 0 ug/L 1.0 S-8021 08/14/1995 1488 trachloroethene <1. 0 ug/L 1.0 S-8021 08/14/1995 1488

' luene <1. 0 ug/L 1.0 S-8021 08/14/1995 1488 ,2 , 3-Trichlorobenzene <1. 0 ug/L 1.0 S-8021 08/14/1995 1488

L 2,4-Trichlorobenzene <1. 0 ug/L 1.0 S-8021 08/14/1995 1488 1,1-Trichloroethane <1. 0 ug/L 1.0 S-8021 08/14/1995 1488 1,2-Trichloroethane <1. 0 ug/L 1.0 S-8021 08/14/1995 1488

r richloroethene <1. 0 ug/L 1.0 S-8021 08/14/1995 1488 ichlorofluoromethane <4.0 ug/L 4.0 S-8021 08/14/1995 1488 2,3-Trichloropropane <1. 0 ug/L 1.0 S-8021 08/14/1995 1488 2,4-Trimethylbenzene <1. 0 ug/L 1.0 S-8021 08/14/1995 1488

1, 3 , 5-Trimethylbenzene <1. 0 ug/L 1.0 S-8021 08/14/1995 1488 ·1 Lnyl Chloride <3.0 ug/L 3.0 S-8021 08/14/1995 1488

rlenes I Total <3.0 ug/L 3.0 S-8021 08/14/1995 1488 ~ thyl-t - butyl ether <1. 0 ug/L 1.0 S-8021 08/14/1995 1488

3urr: Bromofluorobenzene 93.7 % n/a S-8021 08/14/1995 1488

Tl~ ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, INC.

~HAN O~U~D"EdllD coMPANY Ps r. ADDRESS /(960/ {;ves1 {Ouflo?C'I ~fV',i?f

INVOICE TO:---'-'--------PHONE (I..UY.lez l{ 1 - vo; 11 FAx Gccr - o '( '<r PROJECT NAME/LOCATION ....~.A~M:...:!"'!:...!?fr'__Lt .....!-f~e"-'c..Jiu, ___ ________ _ P.O. NO. PROJECT NUMBER 0 'S" 5 - 5 i-1 co I PROJECT MANAGER lOewe ~14. L-y< k,ek NETQUOTENO. ----- ------

SAMPLED BY ~ ~9-{/ -·~'!'~ To assist us in selectinfl the proper method QQ~,!t.:!:, /._ 'j.6.h. eft.. -1

~ Is this work being conducted for regulatory

(PRINT NAME)

ut;J., ·L~.,.... SIGNATURr:/~:.:n fh::;_, .A-- ~; compliance monitoring? Yes ___ No ___

S±~vPVl 1.::::: . (PRINT NAME) SIGNA fORE ...... Is this work being conducted for regulatory #and Type of I~ ., enforcement action? Yes ___ No ___

Containers

~ :r: Which regulations apply: RCRA ___ NPDES Wastewater ___

X '.) UST ___ Drinking Water ___

m n. J: "' 0 a:

~ ~ DATE TIME SAMPLE 10/DESCRIPTION a: < ::;; C3 0 0 w

~ Other ___ None ___

!;;: a: 0 J: "' z (/) J: N 1-

::;; C) 0 z J: J: 0 r

COMMENTS

8+95 1:35 1\/\W- I ~ I l ~ ,, lAc; F1 E-lL> C)( AN k X t { I~ ,, 2 ID MW-2- IX ( t 13 '· 2:zv Ouo l~ e,cv\- G X l ( 3 I • z ~ 3-5 AAW-~ f, l rl 3 lo

trfV'l I;:)

A ( __....,

TEMPERATURE UPON:~~:co>z.. ~ CONDITION OF SAMPLE: BOTTLES INTACT? (YES'/ NO COG SEALS PRESENT AND INTACT? -¥EO/ 1~0 FIELD FILTERED? YES ttJ0 VOLATILES FREE OF HEADSPACE? ~NO ~oo:rdbyrE"J:? NO

SAMPLE REMAINDER DISPOSAL: RETURN SAMPLE REMAINDER TO CLIENT VIA .c-- · & 3(qs- ·op;o~

I REQUEST NET TO DISPOSE OF ALL SAMPLE REMAINDERS A! DATE

""' ' """""' ucu<:n BY: TIME

~ r;;;;;, ~ IQ~::LL -2 l1~-.9st~3~ i .. 'LJc;· \::>'&Vv.tvlc ~-l..:t~ 2~ I? ~ - ~ METHOD OF SHI~MENT ~M~: fc,o{wo ...k V\. .::r;a://1/V ' f~, f-e~~ Ia ~(11- k_ !)

') ,t ' 1- .•. rr. .. \;\ \·

PT 1 - ORIGINAL· WHITE PT 2 · NET PROJECT MANAGER- YELLOW PT 3- CUSTOMER COPY· PINK

Appendix B Well Development Form


MONITORING WELL DEVELOPMENT Fonn 4400-1138 Rev. 4-90

Route to: Solid WasteD Haz. Waste D Wastewater D Env. Response & Repair D Underground Tanks (!5! OtherD

1. Can this well be purged dry ? l:sJ Yes DNo ·

2. Well development method surged with bailer and bailed ISi1 41

surged with bailer and pumped D 61

surged with block and bailed D 42 surged with block and pumped D 62

surged with block, bailed and pumped o· 70

compressed air D 20

bailed only D 10

pumped only D 51

pumped slowly D 50

Other D ili 3. Time spent developing well __ 11.__ mm.

4. Depth of well (from top of well casing) --~·L ft.

5. Inside diameter of well -~-05_ in.

6. Volume of water in filter pack and well casing __ _2.~ gal.

7. Volume of water removed from well __ _2.~ gal.

8. Volume of water added (if any) gal.

9. Source of water added -------------

10. Analysis perfonned on water added? (If yes, attach results)

16. Additional comments on development:

Well developed by: Person's Name and Firm

Name: David Lyshek

Finn: PSI

DYes DNo

11. Depth to Water (from top of a. __ 1§.1.!!__ ft. well casing)

Date b . ..!!._ .!! ..!!._ ..!! ~ ~

Time

12. Sediment in well bottom

13. Water clarity

mm d d y y

1 2 0 0 Da.m. c. __ : __ IS)p.m.

inches

Clear t'!iJ 1 0 Turbid D 1 5 (Describe)

--_1_8. !Q.-ft.

~!f~_y_!~ mm d d y y

Da.m. ~Si:Jp.m.

___ inches

Clear t'!iJ 2 0 Turbid D 2 5 (Describe)

Fill in if drilling fluids were used and well is at solid waste facility :

14. Total suspended solids

---- _mg/1 ---- _mg/1

15. COD _____ mg/1 _____ mg/1

I hereby certifY that the above mfonnation is true and correct to the best of my knowledge

Signature: ~ L Print Initials: ~ ...f::..._ L

PSI Firm: 16601 West Dakota Street, New Berlin, WI 53151 (414) 641-0911

NOTE: Shaded areas are for DNR use only. See instructions for more infonnation including a list of county codes.

ShOOt

State of Wisconsin MONITORJNG WELL DEVELOPMENT Department of Natural Resources Form 4400-113B Rev. 4-90

Route to: Solid WasteD Haz. Waste D Wastewater D Env. Response & Repair D Underground Tanks l1Q OtherD

1. Can this well be purged dry ? Ill Yes DNo

2. Well development method

surged with bailer and bailed 121 41 surged with bailer and pumped D 61

surged with block and bailed D 42 surged with block and pumped D 62

surged with block, bailed and pumped D 70

compressed air D 20

bailed only D 10

pumped only D 51

pumped slowly D 50

Other D ]lj[

3. Time spent developing well 30 min. ----4. Depth of well (from top of well casing) __ 19.q_ ft.

5. Inside diameter of well _ _]..05_ in.

6. Volume of water in filter pack and well casing --~·L gal.

7. Volume of water removed from well --~·q_ gal.

8. Volume of water added (if any) gal.


10. Analysis performed on water added? (If yes, attach results)



Name: David Lyshek

Firm: PSI

DYes DNo

Before

11. Depth to Water (from top of a. __ ~.6~- ft. __ ...!.?.00 _ft. well casing)

Date b. ~.!1~_!_1_2 ~ ~.!!~_!!!.~

Time


13. Water clarity

mm d d y y

1 2 2 0 Da.m. c. __ : _ -ISlp.m.

inches

Clear D 1 0 Turbid lXI 1 5

(Describe) Redish brown

mm d d y y

Clear ro 2 0 Turbid D 2 5 (Describe)

Da.m. 121 p.m.

inches



---- _mg/1 _____ mg/1

15. COD _____ mg/1 _____ mg/1

I hereby certifY that the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge

Signature~ C... ~ Print Initials: D C ~

PSI Firm: 16601 West Dakota Street, NewBerlin, WI 53151 (414)641-0911

NOTE: Shaded areas are for DNR use only. See instructions for more information including a list of county codes.

ShOOt

State of Wisconsin MONITORING WELL DEVELOPMENT Department of Natural Resources Form 4400-113B Rev. 4-90

Route to: Solid WasteD Haz. Waste D Wastewater D Env. Response & Repair D Underground Tanks I:'Sl OtherD

1. Can this well be purged dry ?

2. Well development method surged with bailer and bailed surged with bailer and pumped surged with block and bailed surged with block and pumped surged with block, bailed and pumped compressed air bailed only pumped only pumped slowly Other

3. Time spent developing well

D Yes

ri(J 41

D 61 D 42 D 62 D 70

D 20 D 10 D 51 D 50

D IE

III No

- __?.!!._- min.

4. Depth of well (from top of well casing) __ 19.L ft.

5. Inside diameter of well _ ~.05 _ in.

6. Volume of water in filter pack and well casing

7. Volume of water removed from well

8. Volume ofwater added (if any)

--~·L gal.

__ 12.Q_ gal.

gal.





Name: Steve Hailer

Firm: PSI

DYes DNo

Before

11. Depth to Water (from top of a. ___ gq~- _ ft. well casing)

Date b. ~.!J~_y_2~

Time


13. Water clarity

mm d d y y

0 1 3 0 Da.m. c. __ : __ Dap.m.

inches

Clear D 1 0 Turbid lXI 1 5

(Describe) Redish brown

__ ...!_7.00 _ft.

~.!!~_!_!_!~ mm d d y y

Da.m. ~p.m.

___ inches

Clear lXI 2 0 Turbid D 2 5

(Describe)



15. COD

---- _mg/1 _____ mg/1

_____ mg/1 _____ mg/1

I hereby certifY that the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge

Signature: ~~~~~~~~--,r~~~~-------

Print Initials:

PSI Firm: 16601 West Dakota Street, New Berlin, WI 53151 (414) 641-0911

NOTE: Shaded areas are for DNR use only. See instructions for more information including a list of county codes.

ShOOt

Appendix C Site Plan

WI BeLL BILLING CeNTeR BUILDING

CONCRETE SIDEWALK -~· L---------------------------------------------------~~~~~-----------r·~--··--MW·10sB·1

I ----ll... BENCHMARK ELEV •. 100.00•

PARKING LOT

BUILDING

AMER/TECH Environmental Services 845 N. 35th STREET MILWAUKEE. WI

16601 w. D•kot• Street New Btu/in, WI 53151 Tel (414/ 641-0911 Fu (414/ 641·0P!8 SffE PLAN

WI BELL PATIO

FENCE/

......

PARKING LOT

R. GEER 10/3/95 - ... r.3o·-o· 055-SHOOl

TABLE I Groundwater Elevations

Table I Groundwater Elevations

Wisconsin Bell Billing Center t/ qz.. PIV~C{,pS

MW-1 DRY DRY 15.95 674.31 16.10 674.16 MW-2 16.08 674;25 15.50 674.83 15.62 674.71 MW-3 15.73 674.35 15.00 675.08 15.18 674.90

Notes: Groundwater elevations taken from the north side of the top of the casing Depth to groundwater measured in feet Groundwater elevations measured in feet above MSL - : Not measured on this date


Southeast District P.O. Box 12436

4041 North Richards Street Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53212

George E. Meyer TELEPHONE 414-961-2727 Secretary TELEFAX 414-961-2770

October 3, 1994 File Ref: 241317670

Mr. Jeff Haas Wisconsin Be 11 Nl7 W24300 Riverwood Drive 1st Floor Waukesha, Wisconsin 53188

Dear Mr. Haas:

ERR/LUST

The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) acknowledges the receipt on September 20, 1994 of your response to the questions presented in the WDNR letter dated August 4, 1993.

The WDNR concurs with the recommendation of additional Please continue to monitor for the parameters analyzed 1993 report. Please indicate why PAHs are observed in borings, but especially at a depth of 23 feet in SB4. processes would have produced the PAHs at this site.

groundwater monitoring. in the PSI January 29, a 11 of the soil Please explain what

\t<ll.'€.-~0~ !"1-1({ 9UL~lt<'\ 0--IJ~

If you have any me at the above

questions regarding this letter, please feel free to contact address or call at (414) 961-2735.

Sincerely, WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

~~sh~ Candice Lindstrom Hydrogeologist

cc: SED - Case File Jeffrey Miotke - PSI

~-~ ~~

Professional Service Industries, Inc~ w ~ T

September 16, 1994

Ms. Candice Lindstrom Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources 4041 North Richards Street PO Box 12436 Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53212

Re: Underground Storage Tank Wisconsin Bell Billing Center 845 North 35th Street Milwaukee, Wisconsin WDNR File Reference: 4400-2600 PSI File No.: 052-24033

Dear Ms. Lindstrom:

?~~a SEP 2 0 1994

CJ_

On behalf of our client, Mr. Jeff Haas, Professional Service Industries, Inc. (PSI) has formulated a response to the request for additional information submitted by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR).

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Upon review of the case file along with additional site examination, PSI has prepared the following information and documentation to satisfy the questions the WDNR has presented.

1. Exactly when were the 55.15 tons of contaminated soils over-excavated? Were the soils over-excavated during the removal of the tank or were they over-excavated during the month of October?

The contaminated soils were over-excavated on August 5, 1992 during the removal of the tank.

2. The Boring Site Plan shows the collection location for each of the six ( 6) soil samples collected from the excavation. However, the "Site Contamination Assessment" report is lacking information regarding the samples themselves. Of interest to the WDNR is the following:

a) Please have your consultant submit data indicating the depth at which each sample was collected.

2050 South Calhoun Road • New Berlin, WI 53151 • 414/ 782-1600 • Fax 414/782-1603

Professional Service Industries ========================::::;,

Wisconsin DNR September 16, 1994 Page 2

Approx. Sample Location Depth

S-1 north wall S-2 west wall S-3 south wall S-4 east wall S-5 west pipe run S-6 east pipe ru n

PID: Photoionization Detector i.u. : Instrument Units BDL: Below Detection Limit

8' 9' 8' 8' 3' 2'

PID (i.u.) DRO (ppm)

3 87.8 2 123 1 107 1 125

BDL 14.3 BDL 18.8

b) The laborato1y analysis for each of the six (6) soil samples are missing from the report. Please have your consultant submit this information for the WDNR review.

The laboratory analysis for each of the six (6) soil samples are attached.

See Appendix A /

c) Please submit the chain-of-custody form for the six (6) soil samples.

The chain-of-custody form for the six (6) soi l samples are attached.

See Appendix B ./

3. On the Boring Site Plan, PSI shows an approximate excavation limit. The approximate excavation limit is dated October 5, 1992. It appears that six (6) soil samples (S1 through S6) were collected at the time of the over-excavation. 55.15 tons of contaminated soil (check off as gravel) were taken to the Payne & Dolan asphalt plant. What were the final dimensions of the excavation?

The final dimensions of the excavation were 16' x 25 ' x 9 = 3,600 cubic feet approximately 133 cubic yards.

4. According to the Boring Site Plan, PSI shows that the three (3) soil borings B-1, B-2, and B-3 were converted to groundwater monitoring wells. The soil borings were installed on September 16 and 17, 1992. According to the monitoring well construction forms for groundwater monitoring wells MW1, MW2, and MW3, these wells were constructed on October 12, 1992.

Professional Service Industries =========================::;,


The soil boring logs, monitoring well construction forms and monitoring well development forms pertaining to these three (3) wells must be submitted for the WDNR 's review.

Please explain the discrepancy between the Boring Site Plan and the data of installation for the groundwater monitoring wells.

a) The Boring Site Plan shows soil borings B-1, B-2, and B-3 as groundwater monitoring wells MWJ, MW2, and MW3.

b) The monitoring well construction forms indicate that the wells were installed on October 12, 1992. The four (4) soil borings B-1 through B-4 were installed in September 1992.

c) On page 6 of the Site Contamination Assessment report, it is stated that "upon completion of the test borings, they were properly abandoned by backfilling with bentonite. "

The monitoring wells were not constructed in the soil boring holes. The soil borings were drilled on September 16 and 17, 1992 and backfilled with bentonite. The monitoring wells were drilled and constructed on October 12, 1992. A revised Site Plan is attached (See Appendix C) indicating the location of the soil borings and groundwater monitoring wells. Attached for the WDNR review are the soil borings logs, monitoring well construction forms, and monitoring well development forms pertaining to the above noted wells and borings. (See Appendices D, E, & F)

5. According to the above-referenced report, groundwater monitoring well MWJ was completed as a dry well. This well must be abandoned according to the provisions outlined in Wisconsin Administrative Code NR 141. Upon abandonment, the proper well abandonment form must be submitted to the WDNR.

On August 22, 1994, the groundwater elevation of MW1, MW2 and MW3 were checked. The groundwater elevations were as follows:

Eleva tion Eleva tion G roundwate r Station G round Surface Top of Casing Eleva tio n (8-22-94)

MW1 100.52' 100.26' 83.96' MW2 100.93' 100.33" 84.63' MW3 100.43' 100.08' 84.08'

MW1 has corrected itself and is no longer a dry well; therefore, it should not be abandoned at this time.

Professional Service Industries ========================:::;,


6. The abandonment forms for all soil borings installed at the site are m-issing from the case file. Please have your consultant submit the proper forms.

The abandonment forms for all soil borings installed at the site are attached.

See Appendix G

7. Groundwater samples were collected from groundwater monitoring wells MWJ, MW2, and MW3. Acetone and methylene chloride appeared in samples collected from MW2, MW3 and in the trip blank.

a) Please explain where the acetone and methylene chloride are coming from.

Acetone and methylene chloride are common laboratory contaminants. Both compounds are used in extraction processes and are distributed throughout the lab by the ventilation system. PSI lab is moving the GC/MS equipment to another floor to distance the GC/MS equipment from the extraction equipment.

b) How was the trip blank collected?

Although no trip blank was included with the groundwater samples, a field blank was collected. The procedure for obtaining the field blank was to fill the bailer with deionized water after the decontamination process and pour this water into the appropriate analytical sample jars for analysis.

8. On page 9 of the Site Contamination Assessment report, it is stated that "The well sampling equipment was decontaminated prior to and between collecting samples with an Alconox wash and methanol and deionized water rinse."

a) What was done with the waste generated from the decontamination procedures?

The decontamination fluids were added to and absorbed by the soils generated from over-excavation activities, which were incorporated into asphalt.

b) Please submit documentation indicating the percent concentration of methanol used during the decontamination procedure.

The concentration of methanol used during the decontamjnation procedure was 99.9% CH30H.

Professional Service Industries ==========================i!


c) Please submit the Material Safety Data Sheet for the methanol used in the rinse.

The Material Safety Data Sheet for methanol is attached.

See Appendix H

n rr111' e n' ead"paCe •at-"ript1L:ntv nr··u- c- e -1- -,-- - .t:~ ,·- "0: 1 -- ·~--'"" ,. ,. 1/ ,_,. , ,.A ~ .,.A ~~~'··zeA ~f fi.e ";I. • -> -> Or UU I;; jU .} U .}UfftjJLI:;,) l..V££t:;L.Lt:;U UILU UI£UL.Y U UL ,,.

site was not included in the report. Please submit wn"tten documentation describing the head space sampling procedures.

The procedure for headspace sampling is titled "Field Screenings" on pages 6 and 7 of the Site Contamination Assessment report. In addition, a copy if attached.

See Appendix I

10. Please provide a description of the investigative waste handling procedures. Include soil cuttings from drilling activities, wash water, and any other investigative wastes generated.

Soil cuttings were stockpiled with over-excavated soil, wash water was disposed of by being poured on and absorbed by the stockpile.

11. On page 14 of the Site Contamination Assessment, PSI shows a Summary of Analytical Tests table. Listed on this table are the soil samples collected, the depth below ground suiface from which it was collected from, and the analyte analyzed/detected. Of patticular interest is the area depicting the PAHs. According to this table, the analytes were detected in parts per million (ppm), however, according to the laboratory analytical results, the analytes were detected in pat1s per billion (ppb ). Plea.'ie have your consultant look into this matter and, if needed, submit a revised Summary table.

The laboratory analytical results are correct with P AHs detected in parts per billion (ppb ). Attached is a summary of the P AHs detected.

See Appendix J

12. On page 16 of the Site Contamination Assessment report, PSI states, ''it is estimated that about one hundred ( 100) cubic yards of contaminated soil remain at this site. " The Boring Site Plan depicts the estimated extent of contaminated soils above 100 ppm.

Professional Service Industries ========================:::::j'J


a) Is the estimated 100 cubic yards of contaminated soils remaining in-place indicative of the soils contaminated above 100 ppm?

It is estimated that there is less than 67 cubic yards of soil contaminated above 100 ppm DRO remaining on-site.

b) How was this estimate detem1ined?

This estimate was based on soil borings B-1 through B-4 and soil samples S1 through S6. Through interpolation, a perimeter of contamination was determined. The soils confined within this perimeter and outside of the over-excavation represents the contamination over 100 ppm ORO remaining on-site.

If you have any questions, please feel free to call us at ( 414 )782-1600.

Sincerely,

PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC.

~:ke~ Department Manager

JPM/cas cc: Jeff Haas, Ameritech

Appendices: A. Analytical Results S 1-S6 B. Chain-of-Custody C. Site Plan D. Soil Boring Logs E. Monitoring Well Construction Forms F. Monitoring Well Development Forms G. Soil Boring Abandonment Forms H. Methanol Material Safety Data Sheet I. Head Space Sampling Procedure J. PAH Analytical Summary

u: \ 055\jpm \ 9 1694.11 r

APPENDIX A

Analytical Results Sl-S6

- l

Professional Service Industries, Inc.

PSI -Milwaukee Project: Wlsclnson Bell Billing-Center

Respectfully Submitted,

~e~~~~i' Department Manager

ANAL YriCAL REPORT

J 6-2c- 92 Date

59323020-217 40 August 20, 1992

UJ Professional Servicelnd~stries ~ 4820 West 15th Street, Lawrence, Kansas 66049

I

-r\j ~l PSI - Milwaukee 59323020-21740 Project: Wlscinson Bell Billing Center August 20, 1992

l

RJ DETECTION

LAB# CUENT# ANALYTE RESULT UMIT UNITS METHOD

I

t] 634092 WC-1 Benzene <50 50 ugjkg 8020

Toluene <50 50 ugjkg 8020

Ethylbenzene <50 50 ugjkg 8020

II Xylenes 67 50 ugjkg 8020

Al TPH - Extractable 3550/8015 .

'~ Diesel Range

tit] Organics 138 3 mgjkg WI SW-141

Lh PCB'S

AR 1221 <22 22 ugjkg 8080

b AR 1232 <22 22 ugjkg 8080

AR 1242/1016 <22 22 ugjkg 8080

. ! . AR 1248 <22 22 ugjkg 8080

AR 1254 <22 22 ugjkg 8080

l;J AR 1260 <22 22 ugjkg 8080 ~-

k) Corrosivity p P or F 9045

Open Cup

1.:] Flashpoint >245 75 cF ASTM 092

pH 9.49 0.01 UNITS 9045 """". . ~ Reactivity, Cyanide: S010 .. IJ Specific rate :· ... ' of Release <0.0003 0.0003 mgjkg sec u· I Total Available <0.5 0.5 mgjkg

(1~] Reactivity, Sulfide 9030

Specrric rate -· I of Release <0.0003 0.0003 mgjkg sec

r] Total Available <0.5 0.5 mgjkg

TCLP Metals [] Arsenic <0.04 0.04 mgjl 6010

Barium 0.578 0.001 mgjl 6010

Cadmium <0.002 0.002 mgjl 6010 . -J

J; Chromium <0.002 0.002 mg/L 6010

Lead <0.03 0.03 mgjl 6010

Mercury <0.0002 0.0002 mgjl 7471

-- Selenium <0.035 0.035 mg/L 6010

~j_J Silver <0.C03 0.003 mg/L 6010

j; ~ .

':~'

J. '] P- pH = 2.0 to 12.0

F- pH= <2.0 or> 12.0

-

II

L1 L] b lJ [~

hj !1 !J

Professional Service Industries 4820 West 15th Street, Lawrence, Kansas 66049

PSI- Milwaukee Project: Wiscinson Bell Billing.Center

LAB# CUENT# ANALYTE RESULT

634093 N. WaH TPH- Extractable

Diesel Range

Organics 87.8

634094 W. Wall TPH - Extractable

Diesel Range

Organics 123

634095 S. Wall TPH- Extractable

Diesel Range

Organics 107

634096 E. Wall TPH - Extractable

Diesel Range

Organics 125

634097 W. Pipes TPH- Extractable

Diesel Range

Organics 14.3

634098 E. Pipes TPH- Extractable

Diesel Range

Organics 18.8

DETECTION LJMJT

10

10

10

10

10

10

UNITS

mgjkg

mgjkg

mgjkg

mgjkg

mgjkg

mgjkg

59323020-21740 August 20; 1 992

-n-1

METHOD

3550/8015

WI SW-141

3550/8015

WI SW-141

3550/8015

WI S\N-141

3550/8015

WI SW-141

3550/2015

WI SW-141

3550/2015

WI SW-141

APPENDIX B

Chain-of-Custody

,,:_·- r~""- l~ ~~:.~~ r~r-..:, -~;<,..... --flt.- p,r-----~~~~~~~w.....J~ m

CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD . rnOJECT NAME flEPORTTO INVOICE TO

\Ji ~ . .f:xM __ i)~lli~1-_Ce~~tT~--- .. JA~~~-rs L ... . l~ i~-~~~~~rf --~-----·--------------------------------------- LAllOilATOIW SU[lMITfED TO:

l'lll ).IE CT Nl JMilEJ1 I'JIOJECT MAt~ACEll ADDJ1ESS

_&_1 i tJ~£v.)_6./ 'r~ l1kfi{{~----- 0 6913 Hwy. 225 0 4820 W. 15111 Street

----. --------------------------- Deer Park, TX 77536 Lawrence, t<S 66049 P.O. NUMt3ER ADDRESS CITY I STATE/ZIP (713) 479-8307 (000) 540-7901 i

Z0_c;D _5 Ca--l.boL~LA __ _ 0 6056 Ulrnerton Road 0 850 Poplar Street -------

REQUIRED DUE DATE CITY I STATE I ZIP AHENTION CleaJWater, FL 34620 Pillsburull, PA 15220 (813) 531-1446 (412) 922-4000

--------- --- ------------------- ------SAMPLES TO LAO VIA TELEPHONE TELEI'IIONE

----------~---------

FAX

l·lUMUEI1 OF COOLERS REPORT VIA VH\LlAL FAX LADORATORY USE ONLY

ANALYTICAL DUE DATE <6-\~-q2 ' U.S. MAIUOVEHNIGIIT

LADORATORY USE ONLY REPORT DUE DATE ~ -~o~'i<;;< TfWIS FEll RELINQUISitED BY ACCEPTED 13Y SEAL

FIELD SERVICES INORGANIC ORGANIC NlJf,\BER

~1~ DATE/TIME NUMOEH YIN $ Soct Row Soc I ~ Row Q_

Yilt a.--:-- ;p;jl;j. "" --- ---------- ~~Lf!lOJE9.I NAME _p S"I- - f"\ ~ \ v) o.. u \t. u_ -- v [~- -ft:.-'-~e_~--~z;·- -----·-·---·· SIIII'I'ING " PSIPROJECTU Sqi.J_&~..Q 0 ------Y/N $ ~ t~A-v~~ K rz!:!:-_~::.1" :_1_!1_ PSIUATCH U ~ 1\ '-\ 0

------- ------ / PARA~TER / Ul LIST a: '~J UJ :z

LADORA TOnY USE DilLY ~ .v/ W :J( 3' SAMPLE CUSTODIAN DATE/3ME 0 u

·~~ " C'.~r-·,s ¥1{) r'c - LrCf~ u .. I 0 \ 0 ~ • '-

a: ~~4J. .~ 0 '

SOIL·S LAO USE lU m

COMf>-C WATEHW DilLY ::e ~-CJ tJ\ <) \} }, \ " '~ (-:::> SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION DATE I TIME GRA0-0 WASTE-X LAllNUMllEn :z ---JZ=" <fc; ~II~

----·--v/ ("".,/ ~--""v /v /v c s &3Lf ocl:; _(L ~ _v vv ~L c-~ -- - -- - - ---- --

_iJJt-ic.l[= <~Lr: ~ ,.()(_ _____:B __ '\/693 2_ v v i - ·-- ! ____ • - --- ~- -

_kL t~C\L _ _ 5?1? 'b~-L~~ -0-- - Dq~- 3 ,/ ~ {

---

_5_ vJ f1_e:_

1 ~-·· z_.;-lD/; ~- r.l _ C/16 _3_ j/ vJ

-- 2__ -- --~--- -----· ---·~

1- - . \

0/L·..,~~?; ~13- _ __QS_k _2_ v __ £.~-~A ·- ~-- ----~~~:~'2 e12_:_Jy _3.~ ~ \V o9l 3 v tl ..

7 -

L~?-ip~:S ~~~ 3:~ _12_ _ _\~-- L;±iu9'3 l v :-..

_,

--------- - ----------·--- -------- - - - -- - - - -- - -- - - - - - - --I -

---------- -------- -----·-------- ·--- - --- -- ·- - - - ---- - - 1- - -- -- - 1(7/l l II L] -ADDITIONAL. nEMArli<S. --- --·-. -- ·-- ---- --·· --- ... -·--- ... .. . - .. ·· ~;-~;~;--;~;~.~~-;,;;.-~;~~~-;~~;;;f!xaf!&c/}·t!UJf- -- . ---- ---------··- --~- ------

i

APPENDIX C

Site Plan

CONCRETE SIDEWALK y<>· i-------------------------,1

x-x-x~

~ r WI BELL r 9

LEGEND

DIESEL RANGE ORGANICS (ORO) (PPM)

NS NOT SAMPLED

NO NO DETECTION

IU INSTRUMENT UNITS

DEPTH BELOW GROUND SURFACE (FEET)

BENCHMARK ELEV. 100. 00'

BORING/MONITORING WELL LOCATION

PHOTOIONIZA TION DETECTOR (IU)

® MONITORING WELL LOCATION

SOIL BORING LOCATION

8-4

PARKING LOT

Professional Service Industries, Inc. . 48~ w. 15th s::eet

Lo•<'ence, KS 65:49

1 PA T/0

1 X X I

-x-x-x

r r i i r r r i X

FENCE

AMERITECH 845 N. 35th St. Milwaukee, ~

J. Arersberg

SITE PLAN

PARKING LOT

a;Jo/94 A 1

052-24033

APPENDIX D

Soil Boring Logs


RECORD OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION

Boring ___ B-_I ______ _

Project Name: _..:.W:.::i.::..sc.::..o:..:.n:..:.s.::..in:.::....:::Be=.::..:ll:......=B.::..il:.:l:..::in~g~Ce.::..n:..::t:.:e.::..r _________ Date of Boring: __ S_e..:...p.::..terrbe.;_:_:.::..r.:.__l.::..6"-, .::..1..::....9.::..:92=---

Site: ____ _:84_5_:N_._3S_t_h_S_t_r_ee_t_-_Mi_._lw_a_uk_ee-'':...._WI ________ Project No.: ___ o_s2_-_2_40_3_3 ____ _

DESCRIPTION DEPTH SAMPLE N Ou PID rna REMARKS

SURFACE ='*.'1oist, Bro;.m SAND A.l.'ID GRAVEL (FIU.) r -~1.st, Bro;.m SAND, Trace Clay and As~alt -~-o(FII.L) (SP) - I-SS IS NO No Cdor -1-Moist, Bro;.m, Clayey SAND, Trace Gravel •(POSSIBLE FilL) • 5 • 2-SS

-5 NO No Cdor •

-- --- 3-SS 4 NO <10 No Cdor -1- -1-

(SP) -~'1oist, Gray, Silty CLAY, Trace Sand and 10 • 4-SS 6 NO No Cdor • 1-Gravel -- - 5-SS 17 NO No Cdor -

-1-1- (CL)

- 6-SS 13 NO <10 No Cdor -~ IS l-End of Boring - -

---_Boring dry upon completion. - -

---~ • • 1-PID - Photoionization Detector value in parts - -

.... per million - --

1- --DRO - Total Petroleum Hydrocarbcn as Diesel - -~ Range Organics in parts per million. • •

-1- - --1- -1- -

-1- -

"' • •

--1- -1- -

--- ---• • •

--- --1- --1- --1-

.. • • --- --- --1- --1-I • • --1-

'"SI A·1G0-9



Boring __ B-_2 ________ _

Project Name: _W_::i..:...s..:...co_n_s_in_Be_ll_B_il_l_i_:ng=--C_en_t_e_r _________ Date of Boring: __ S::..;e:s:p-=.terrbe=-=.r=--:1~6.1..., _:1:.::.9~92=----

Site: _____ 84:.._'..:...5_N __ ._3S_t_h_St_r_ee_t_-_Mi_._l_wa_uke __ e:...., _WI ________ Project No. : ___ 0_5_2-_2_40_3_3 ____ _

DESCRIPTION DEPTH SAMPLE N Ou PlD liD REMARKS

-SURFACE ::\As)ilalt Paverrent 1- -

1-Moist, Brcwn, Silty CI.M, Trace Sand and - I-SS 17 No Recovery -- Drove Stone

-._Gravel

- (CL) - 2-SS 26 ND No Odor -~Moist, Gray, Silty CLAY, Trace to Little • ·s - • 1- Sand and Gravel - 3-SS 18 ND No Odor -

-1-1- - 4-SS 17 <I <10 No Odor -

--• 10 • s-ss 17 ND No Odor •

--- (CL) - 6-SS 17 ND <10 No Odor -

1- End of Boring - -

~ • • 1- Boring dry U1XlD canpletion. - -

-1- ->-Boring dry 2 hoors after canpletion. - -

---•pro - Photoionization Detector value in parts • • 1- per million - -

----DRO- Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon as Diesel - -- Range Organics in parts per million - -

• • • --- --- --- ---

• • • --1- -

1- - -1- - ---• • •

--- --1- -1- - -1- -~ • •

--- --1- --I- --I-

'- • • --1-

"SI A-1oo-9



Boring __ B-_3 ________ _

Project Name: ~W.;.:i~s-=-co.:....n~s-=in~Be~ll.:......=B.:....il=-l_i_n""-g-=C.:....e.:..:.nt.:....e.:....r _________ Date of Boring: __ Se~p-=-terrne=· -=-r=--1..::.6.!...., _1..::.9=-92=---

Site: _____ 84:.:.....:.S_N.:....·----=3=-Sth~.:....St.:....r.:....ee..;,....;,..t_-_Mi...;..._·l_w_auke...;..._.:....e.:...., _WI~------- Project No.: ___ o_S2_-_2_40_3_3 ____ _

DESCRIPTION DEPTH SAMPLE N au PID liD REMARKS

SURFACE h As~alt Paverrent _r

C\i10ist, BrONn SAl'ID AND GRAVEL (FilL) 7 - I-SS 13 NO No Odor -~Moist, BrONn, Slightly Mottled, Silty CLAY, -~Trace Sand and Gravel (CL) - 2-SS 17 ND No Odor -

~Moist, Gray, Silty CLAY, Little to Sore Gravel • 5 - • ~Trace to Little Sand - 3-SS 19 - No Recovery -

-~

~ - 4-SS 19 - No Recovery ---

• 10 • 5-SS IS <I <10 No Odor • --- - 6-SS 18 ND No Odor --

f-

f- (CL) - 7-SS IS ND <10 No Odor -

IS .

,_End of Boring - --

~ -1-Boring dry upon canpletion. - -

--~ ,. • • r- PID - Photo ionization Detector value in parts - -

- per million - ----

- DRO - Total Petroletm Hydrocarton as Diesel - -.. Range Organcis in parts f:€r million • •

-i- - --i- -i- - ---• • •

--i- --f- --f- --f-.. • • --~ --f- --i- --- • •

• --- ----f- --f-.. • • --

f-

~sl A-1D0-9

Professional Service-Industries, Inc.


Boring __ B_c-4 ________ _

Project Name: _..:.:W.:::is:..:c:..:o:.:..:n::.:s 1::. n:.....::.Be::.:l:..:l..:...B::.:l:.:.l:.::l.:::in:.:.g:z....:::.Ce::::n::..:t:.::e=-r --------- Date of Boring: _....:Se:..=r:.p.:::tenbe=.:::r=-.:1..:...7.!..., ....:1~9=-92=---

Site: ____ __:84_:>::....-...:.N_._3:...:5...:.th ___ S_t_r_ee_t_-_Mi_._lw_a_uke_e...:.';__wr _______ Project No.: ___ o_52_-_2_40_3_3 ____ _

DESCRIPTION DEPTH SAMPLE N PID REMARKS

:\,AsiX]alt Paverrent SURFACE r

~Moist, Black Sill~ (FilL) r - I-SS 22 ND No Odor

f-.,Moist, Brcwn SAND AND GRAVEL (FilL) r ~Moist, Gray and Black, Organic, Silty G..AY - 2-SS 7 ND No Odor

•(FilL) ·5 - • - - 3-SS 5 ND No Odor -

-~Crushed Llirestone (FilL) \..._

--~~~! Brcwn, Silty CLAY, Little Sand an~ - 4-SS 22 ND No Odor -

-~Moist, Green, Organic, Silty aAY, Trace 10 • 5-SS 2 ND No Odor • '-Topsoil (FilL) -- - 6-SS 5 <1 No Odor -

--1- - 7-SS 4 I <10 No Odor -

~ 15 • Moist, Brcwn, Silty CLAY (?TIL)

- 8-SS 7 <1 No Odor --

'-Moist, Brcwn SAND, Trace Silt & Clay (FilL) - 9-SS 6 1 No Odor -1-Moist to Wet, Brcwn Gravel (FilL) -l- 20 • 1o-ss 14 <1 Poor Recovery • 1-Moist to Wet, Brown, Silty ~\D, Sane Gravel

--(FIIL) - 11-SS 3 - Poor Recovery -

--- - 12-SS 7 ND <10 No Odor -

25 ~End of Boring - -

--~ 1-Grooodwater observed at 21.5' belcw groood - -..:...surface in auger upon complet:on. - -

• • • 1-PID - Photoionization Detectc:- value in parts - -

1- per million - ---1-

1- DRO - Total Petroleun Hydroca.---bon as Diesel - -

• Range Organics in parts per million • • --1- --1- --1- ---

• • • --- --- --1- --1-.. • • ---

?SI A-1()0-9

APPENDIX E

Monitoring Well Construction Forms

Stile of Wi:«<Jn~in Department of Na1ural Rc~ourcc~

Rourc ro· Env. Res

0 1'-b d 0 l).w:ncrarlimt

A. Protective pip<:. lop elevation ·# _ 1:1 Q . !2]. ft. MSL

B. Well ca.<ing. top elevation )(! _ ~! Q .k~ ft. MSL-----1+-·,..--,

C. Lux! surface elevation :lt _ fd. Q .2 ft. MSL

13. Sieve analysi.< aruchcd? 0 Yes }(N:> 14. Drilling mclhod u~: Rot.a::ry

Hollow Stem Auger ().1-,c:-

0 50

~I 0 _;_

15. Drilling fluid used: Wa= 0 0 2 Drilling Mud 0 0 3

16. Drilling additives u=l? 0 Yes

A.irOO!

~,S..99

Describe ______________ _

17. Source of watcr (attach analysis):

E. Bentonite seal, tOp

F. Fine SMld. top

G. Filter pack, top ____ . _ ft. MS Lor _ :i 2 . ~

H. Screen joint. top ____ ·- ft. MSL or_ 9_ 1 .£!

l. Wdi bonom ----·- ft.MSLor_8b.Q ft.

1. Filter p~ck. bon om ____ ·- ft. MSL or_ £2 Q . Q

K. Borehole. oouom ____ ·- ft. MSL or_ 8£ .Q

L Borehole.. di:unctcr .!.Q.~ m.

M. 0.0. well nt .. \in~o: _ b ?2 ]- tn.

N. !.D. well ca.,ing _ ~. Q ~ tn.

n

()her 0

Not Kno .... -n

MONITORING WELL CONSTR ucnoN Form .U(Xl-113A Rev. 4-90

I. Cap rld loci:?

~ 2. Proteetive ccver pipe:

Yes 0 ~

a.. lruiJc d.iunctcr: lQ. . Q in.

b. Lcn&L~: _l. Q ft.

c. M llcU.I: ( 2 A tLtw-i n!L~ HUJ)l M(..·· ..... J I

Stc.cl 0 0 J

Oh.:r ~ --d. AOJitioruJ protection? 0 Yes ~ r-b

If :;-cs. dc:<cribc: -----------

3. Surf..::.c su.l: Bentonite l;i'J. 3 0

Concre1e 0 0 1

----------------~omcr o 4. Matcri!.l between well ca..< in~ and pmtectivc pipe:

Bentonite ~ 3 0

Annul.u sp.;ce seal 0 0~'1.= 0

a.. Granular Bcntoni:c ~ 3 3

0 35

c. __ Lbs!~al mud wcit:ht . . . . Bcni.OTlite slurry 0 3 1

d c-c Sc:ntonilc ...... lkntonitc-ccmcnt get:! 0 50 ·-- 3

2..0 .Ft volume added for anvoflhe above c. t2.oo lb) · T ·

0 f. How i.-.su.Jted: rcmJC 0 I Trcmic pump::d 0 01

Gravity t8 0 li

6. Bcntoniu: s.c:!.l: a. Rcntonitc t,'Tanul~ @ 3 3

b. 0 1/.! in. 03/l! in. 0 1/1 in. Bentonite pdlc:.s 0 3 2

c.. ~0

7. Fine s.a.'ld r.:~u:rial: Ma.-,ufactt:rcr. product name&. mesh si1.c

a.B(\Aqv M.,y\i~'l f; .... t.S:l.-c.u..Y .2.il>4"'"" b. Volt=ne .&ded ' ft3 ·

Manufa.:turcr. product!Uillc and mesh size

F:>~.e Si [,· ~r . 2..+o. a.,..__ 8. 5 ft-' gt;o t':>)

Flush t.h.rc.:u!ed PVC schccule .!0 ~ 2 3

FllL<h tlrre:u.k:d PVC schedule eo 0 2 4

~0

£.\. ~,hu!Jt 4o P\/C. I 0. Screen matci al: _t::::.._:l:_.....;::~~~-::l.J..L.-L...>L.l~

a.. Screen t;o"f'C: FactOry C'.;t s I I

Continuous slct 0 0 l

OL':c:- 0

b. M::nubc!:.:rer ...l.IDct;i ([.,l.!t.-~,!_!,·r..,.:::k~------0. QQ ~in.

l.O. ~ ft. c. Slot siJC:

d. Sloucd !oKth:

II. fhckfill r..;Hcial (lx:low fihc.:r 1'"'"'-J: Non: ItS I .!

()j.;- 0

n on this form is trun and coru~ct to t1H1 !Jr!st of m., i<nowlr!dCJO.

J'l\~;t.\c cocnpkte fwl(iJ ~tck:s ot l!us lonn tttK.l rca.::n to tile iij":lrnpo;llc.: J. R. o! I''- c.: '''ted ttl lttc «np nt 1!11~ !• ':"~ <'L' rcquucd hy c.:fl,_ 1.:..:.. 1.: I dflJ li ... J, ...,rs. ~t.~~'-· -t:;,-!(~~ .... ~,~ 1-:!.\l..':·. :\•~ rt••:c· fn:ti'Cf~fd,l~,.-~ -:·l~ttt: :··· \V;,,_\'l.tl\,r.,:/::~~·~,~r:;,.t!u•.{IH'''"".•Vi•·•.'• 1f, ... ~,·i:ll~l··~n.,l>•.<..dl.!fl)J(1,f\o·lr-~r~t~:.:::

St.ate of Wi~n~in [Xparuncnt of Natural Rc<OUrcc~

Route ro· Solid Wa.<tcD Hu_ Wo..~teO Wa<tcwa.tc:rO MONITORING WElLCONSTRUCilON Form .!4()'].JJ3A Rev. 4.90

Env. RcsrxJn5e k Repair 0 Underground T anb 0 Ohcr 0

0 N.> d 0 [)ou.-ncradimt n _!:5. Not Knou:n

A. Protective pipe. !Op elevation *- f1 j f).::!~ ft. MSL

B. Wd! ca.~ing. !Op elevation .:k _ b !:! .Q. 3 3 ft. MSL

C. Land surface elevation -~ _ 12 9 Q .9 ft. MSL

13. Sieve analysis an.achcd? 0 Yes

14. Drilling method used: Rowy 0 .50

Hollow Stem Auger G-4 I

Oiler 0 --

1.5. Drilling Ouid used: Wau:r 0 0 2 Drilling .'.1ud O Q 3

Air 0 01

None a 99

16. Drilling additives u~? 0 Yes

~cribc _____________________ _

17. Source of water (attach arulysis):

E. Bentonite seal. top ____ ·- ft. MSL or _ :l .9. . 2

F. Fine sand. top ---- ·- ft.MSLor _'1.5.~

G. Filt.cr pack. top ____ ·- ft. MSL or_~ 3 . .2

H. Screen joinL top ____ ·- ft. MSL or_:! l.Q

I. Wdl bottom ft. MSL or_ B l . Q ft.

1. Filter p~td:. bot:om ____ ·- ft. MSL or _1. 9_ . .S ft.----:._- ~ ·>.

K. Bo~holo.lxHO<~ ____ ·- f<. MSLo' _ :H .Jl (<.~:

L. Borehole. diameter 1 g .5 m. =:f. \3il.s!cl 0111. Loc6-l

le'-"'porcvy B~"'J.-"""ti- .. 1::._ M. 0.0. well '"-'in~-: _b. 2!: m.

tl \oo.D-:. ~11D.o M.Sl. l~sft.-N. I. D. wdl Cll.\inh 2 0--- ·- ~ '"·

I. Cap and lock?

~2. Prot.ectiv.: cover pipe:

a. Inside: diunctcr. J q. Q in.

b. U:n&t-11: _ .! . Q ft.

c. Ma1cri.tl: ) Sled 0 0 4

AI ~&M.i 11\!..M C Flu.sh Mc •..• .JtJ ()1-.a s. d. A<liitiona.l prot.cction? 0 Yes a( l'b

If yes.d=:ribc: -----------

3. Surface sc.a.l: Bentonite 0 3 0

Concrete ~ 0 I

------------------------~ 0 4. Marcial bcrwccn well ca.< in~ and protective pipe:

Bentonite S' 3 0

Anr.ulu space seal 0 Oha- 0

.5. Annul.r space sal: a. Gra..,ular Bentonite ~ b. ___ Lbs/gal mud wcibht ... fkmo:1ite-sand slurry 0 c. ____ Lbs/gal mud .... -eight . . . . . Bcntonit.c slurry 0 d. '?C Bentonite ...... fkntorut.c-ament gout 0 --- 3

I , ':::> Ft )olume added for anv of the above

~- Ho:P.:-1~1~:5" • Trcnie 0

3 3

3.5

3 I

.50

01

6. Bentonite s.:a.l:

T:1:mie pumped 0 02 oc:

g 33

Gravicy !fi a. Bcn:onite !;fanulc.~

b. 0 l/4 in. 03/ll in. 0 1/2 in. Brntorute pellets 0 32

C.------------- <:».a 0 7. Fine sand material: Manufacturer. product name & mesh si1.c

a. oadau fi.-{~"~"'"J, t=:r'\2. 5:L-cc.Sa..J .ltp.4 .... ~-b. Vol~.c added ft3 ·

8. Filter pad: marerial: Manufacturer. product name and mesh size

a. W~v rAi(\;"'"jl Fioe S;!icc.. W_, .-z.-wA\A-.. b. Vo lurnc added f. S ft'jC."l-5" 0 i bs.)

9. Well ca.<i:1g: Flush threaded PVC schedule 40 ~ 2 3

FltL'h threaded PVC schedule 80 0 2 4

(}her 0 ~I. Sdakte Lo PuC-'

a. Screen type: Factory cut f5;l- 1 I

Continuous slot 0 01

Other 0

b. Manuf:>o:turer ..::D~it..Jd4..!...,-.!:;c..=::l...~-------c. Slot si1c: d. Slouc.d !engL.,:

II. Aaddil! n'..lU.:rial (hdow filter r"..:io.):

0. 0 Qfr! in.

lQ. e r~. Non: _E!( I 4

0UlCI" 0

tion on thi::; !::rm i::; true and corrr!CI to !110 best of r::v knowlr~dco.

<c complete i•oth ~·des ol tlus lonn •rKI return 10 the <f'J""I"'"'c J, R ott1<.:c '"''"d ;II the top ot II11S •-:-rn "-' IC<jtllrt·ol loy d1.\. 1·1.!. 1.: I •ml lt~l. "rs. ~~""·· 1!1r! ,-~~ .~.:~ l·!f. \t.,:., /u! (",,de. fn :tecord.uiCC ...... :ilh r!1 ·.:.:. \V,s .S1.1L\. f.,dlt:c !tJ (d,· !hie; (nnn rn:t~ r~·~'-..:·. 1:1 i'l f,"''fcilurc <~f n.1! k'<; 1}·:.1 S!O. nor more. tt!a!l

Stare 6f Wi~nsin Dcparuncnr of Narural Resources

Route: to· Solid Wa.~teD Haz. WasteD Wa<~ew=D MONITORING WEU. CONSTR ucnO/'\ Form 4400-IIJA Rev. ~-YO

A. l'ro!CCtive pipe. cop elevation*_(:, £1 Q .4 3 fl. MSL

B. Well ca.~ing. top eleva! ion ·* _ ~ ~ Q . Q. B ft. MSL

* _ g :I Q .4 ft. MSL C. Land surfac.: elevation

D. Swfacc seal _!xJtto.m ___ ~ ·- fL ,\iSL or 9 ~. ~ ft. ~·;;~~;K .. :-~. 12. uses classdlcat.Jon of sod ncar screen: •'::::-•

GP 0 GM 0 GC 0 GN 0 SW 0 S P 0 SM 0 SC 0 ML 0 MH 0 CL ~ CH 0 B<:x:lrod: 0

IJ. Sieve analysis aaached?

14. Drilling melhoo used:

0 Ye;

Rotary

t(l'*> 0 50 ¢:4 I

0--Hollow Stem Auger

O.hcr

15. Drilling Ouid used: WaJ.cr 0 0 2 DrilEng ~1ud 0 0 3

16. Drilling additives u$Cd? 0 Yes

Describe ______________ _

17. Source of water (attach analysis):

E. Bentonite seal, top ft. MSL or q q 4 ----·- ---·

F. Fine sand. top ft. MSL or q 5 1 ----·- ---·

G. Filter pacx. top ____ . _ ft. MSL or _ :l .2 .1

H. Screen joinL top ______ ft. MSL or _ jJ. . ±

L Wdl bottom ____ . _ ft. MSL or_ f21 .4:

1. Filter pHck. bottom ____ . _ ft. MSL or _19 . 9.

K. Borehole, bottom ____ . _ ft. MSL or_} .9 . 9

L P.Nrcholc. diameter L Q ."1- 10.

M. 0.0. well ca.~in); 10.

N. !.D. well ca.~in); _'b.Q 5 in.

uni Tank.~ 0 Ohcr 0

Not Kno,.,

I. Cap md lock?

~ 2. Protcctivc cover pipe:

a. Ins ide di !!TlClO':

b. l.cn£th:

1 Q.Q in.

_l. Q ft.

c. ~h.!c-ial: ) SLCC! 0 0 4

ccA.ul~u'-"'M"'l-"l'\-"'!.l..W\.""' n--e,{.!...r::....:../!::0..._ ')~l,l.-..:..1'-'t...:.c"-!~'-<~-~W= 01-.:r S __ d. A<i1itional protection? 0 Ye; r;ir !'*>

If yes. dcc<.cribc: -----------

3. Surf~ sul:

10. Scrc.:n material: f.T 5ch«:L.U 4o a. Screen type:

30 Bentonite 0 Concrete fot( 0 I

JJ

32

F ac-.ory cut

Continuous slot ~II 0 0 I

0 ----------~---------Otha h. ~:a:,uL><:turcr -1-DLJi...:e;..;d"'-!.r..:.."!><c~h..._ ____ _ c. Slot si:c: <l Slotted lcngllt:

I:. Had fill m.at<.:rial (hclow filter pad.):

O.Qgf;>in.

J.Q. Q fl.

~rg.l4

C>lld 0

on thi:; form i:; truo and ccrrr,c to trHJ hASt of mv knowledoo.

IS. :::,t:it.\ ..

APPENDIX F

Monitoring Well Development Forms

State of Wisconsin _ MONITORING WELL DEVELOP.MENT Department of N arural Resources Form 4400-113B Rev, 4-90.

Route to: Solid Waste [J Haz. Waste [J Wastewau::r [J Env. Response & Repair [J Underground Tanks[J Other [J ---

1. Can this well be purged dry?


surged with bailer and bailed

surged with bailer and pumped

surged with block and bailed

surged with block and pumped

surged with block. bailed and purr:ped

compressed air

bailed only

pumped only

pumped slowly

Other


[J Yes [J ?'b

[J 41

0 6 1

0 42

0 62

0 70

0 20

0 10

0 51

0 5..0 0

;.:-:;:::::::: _:2:;:~

____ min.

4. Depth of well (from top of well casisng) ___ . _ ft.

5. Inside diameter of well



8. Volume of wa1er adrled (if any)

9. Source of water added

10. Aru.lysis performed on water adCed? (If yes, attach results)

16. Additional comments on develcpmot:

-- ___ 111.

___ ._gal.

___ ._gal.

___ ._gal.

0 Yes 0 NJ

11. Depth to Water (from top of well casing)

Time


Water clarity

a. --- ft.

u~v

b..J.QI .l~l j_ 1.m m d d y y

0 a.m. c. __ : __ [J

__ ._inches

Clear 0 10 Turbid 0 15

(Describe)

___ . __ ft.

""e-'J u I

.J.. .Q. I _l ~ I .1. 2-mm dd yy

0 a.m. __ : __ [Jp.m.

__ ._inches

Clear 0 20 Turbid 0 25 (Desaibe)

in if drilling fluids were used and well is at solid waste f~ility:

14. Total suspe:1ded ____ . _ mg/1 ____ . _ mg/1

solids

15. COD ____ ._mg/1 ____ ._mg/1.

Print Initials: & E._ 12..

NOTE: Shaded areas are for DNR use only. See instructions for more information i::clt:6ng a list of county codes.

St.ate of Wisconsin Department of Nanrn!l Resources

MONITORING \VELL DEVELOPME.NT Form 4400-113B Rev. 4-90

Route to: Solid Waste 0 Haz. Waste 0 WasiJ!wai£:r 0 Env. Response & Repair 0 Undaground TanksO Other 0 ---




surged with bailer and ptunped



surged with block. bailed and pumped

compressed air

bailed only

pumped only pumped slowly

Other


4. Depth of well (from top of well casisng)


6. Volume of waiJ!r in filter pack and well casing

7. Vol tune of water removed from well

8. Volume of water added (if any)

9. So=ofwateradded

10. Amlysis performed on water added? (If yes, auach results)


Name: l!l Firm:

0 Yes riJ N:>

0 41 0 6 1 0 42 0 62 0 70 0 20 ~ 1 0 0 51

0 §,.Q 0 --:·:·.·:;:· --

__ l2_.Qmin.

- j_ _.:!. • .3.. ft.

__ 2.. z.. gal.

__ .i.J2gal.

-~~·-=-gal.

0 Yes 0 N:>


T!ITie


13. Water clarity

Before Development I After Development

a. _l..h..l.fn.

bj_Q_I J...~l j_ 1. m m d d y y

3a.m. c. _J_: 4- 'i..o p.m.

_:~ ~inches

Oear S:.1 0 Turbid c 1 5 (Desaibe)

- ..i Jz. . .Q_ ii. ft.

j_ .Q_ I l_ _Ia_ I .1.3:: m m d d y y

[3 a.m. l_Q_: 4 ~ 0 p.m.

...=.E... . -=. inches

Oe3r .Ltt" 2 0 Turbid~ 25 (Cesaibe)

Cl..uv- ~ SI;~L:l~ ~...rk.-J

Fill in if drilling fluids were used and well is at solid waste facility:

14. Total suspended ____ . _ mg/1 ____ . _ mg/1

solids

15. coo ____ ._mg/1 ____ ._mg/1

Print rn.i tials: & £ J2

Firm: Peokss(o .. {a.. i ~nltU'' L·du.sh-ic~ Tv..c.

NOTE: Shaded areas are for DNR use only. See inscruc:ions for more information including a list of county codes.

Sute of Wisconsin Department of Narural Resources

MONITORING WELL DEVELOPMENT Form 440Q..l13B Rev. 4-90

Route co: Solid WasteD Haz. Waste D W astewaJa D

Env. Response & Repair D Underground TsnksD Oth.a D ---







surged with block. bailed and pumped

compressed air

bailed only

pumped only

pumped slowly

Other

DYes 0 N:>

D 41

D 61

D 42

D 62 D 70

D 20

ta 10

D 5 1

D 50

D :=;::{:~.::: ~;~

3. Time spent developing well __ .::1:, _2 min.

4. Depth of well (from rop of well casisng) _ J. .S.. . .1. ft.






10. Arulysis paformed on wa.rer added? (If yes, aaach results)

16. Additional corrunents on developmenc

ell developed by:

Name:

Firm:

--~. j_ gal.

- ~ Q . .!2 gal.

-_::_.£..~gal.

DYes D N:>

Before Development After Development 11. Depth to W a.ter

(from top of a. _ ..l.S: .1_ ..2ft. well casing)

Date b . ..l Q. I i_ Jz. I q J:: m m d d y y

s:a.m. Tone c._ i,: 4 '5 D p.m.

12. Sediment in well .::: ~ . ::.._ inches bottom

13. Water clarity Clear J?!- 1 0 Turbid D 15

(Describe)

_j_ 5. l- _2ft.

.1QI.J.~t..12-m m d d y y

ta-a.m. .J. Q.: "2:::. .Qo p.m.

-= ..£.., • ..:.... inches

Oear D 20 Turbid ]2r. 2 5 (Describe)

..CC\-;r~ ±w-6J I ic,t.:f bro<JoA


14. Tot.al suspended ____ . _ mg/1 ____ . _ mg/1

solids

15. COD ____ ._mg/1 ____ ._mg/1

Signacure:

~

Print Initials: liLb. Finn: .. yt J Sl...rY1c.c

NOTE: Shaded tU"eas are for DNR use only. Sc::e ins auctions for more i:lformation including a list of county codes.

APPENDIX G

Soil Boring Abandonment Forms


WELLIDRILLHOLE/BOREHOLE ABANDONMENT Form 3300-SB - ~ev.3-94

All abandonment work shall be performed in accordance with the provisions of Chapters NR 111, NR 112 or NR 141, Wis. Admin. Coda, whichever is applicable. Also, see instructions on back.

(I) GENERAL INFORMATION (2) FAOUfY NAME

Wdt~fi!orehole\ I County Original Well Owner (If Known) Location /?J2V4uf.6£ LJ)r: 'S.C p...]~,J 6CLL-

0 ~E Present Well Owner se:... 1/4 of N 1/4 of Sec . .2< ; T. _::l_ N; R. 21._ Ei w W...c~c_O_c)_s.r) &u.. (If applicable) Street or Koute

Gov't Lot Grid Number Jl// (;}..Jt/sM ~JX'D ~:::>e._ Grid Location City, State, Zip Code

ft0 N. D s .. ft0 E. D W. WAt.;/Le..SfiA _L_ r.,J .c.. Ss;d6 Civil Town Name racllny Weu No. anotor Name VI Appucable) 'WI Unique Well No.

/'1ru.JAv#& B-\ Street Address of Well Reason ror Abandonment

8s15:" ~ollrN 3 s; t:rl ~rtee£.-r CoM~t..C..rt::-o ~e>e.E..t-toLE:.-City, Village Date ?f 1andonrnent

/YJt::(,<..)Ar.J~ 9/1& 1:2 WELUDRILLHOLE/BOREHOLE INFORMATION (J) Original WeHj.{;)RllOOle..(l:lorehble) Construction Completed On (4) Depth to Water (Feet)

(Date) 1 /;f.? /J .< Pump & Piping Removed? DYes 0No0 Not Applicable Liner(s) Removed? 0 Yes ONo 0 Not Applicable

0 Monitoring Well Construction Report Available? Screen Removed? 0 Yes 0 NoD Not Applicable 0 Water Well 0 Yes I8J. No Casing Left in Place? 0 Yes O No 0 Drillhole If No, Explain

181 Borehole Was Casing Cut Off Below Surface? DYes 0No

Construction Type: Did Sealing Material Rise to Surface? D Yes0No g) Drilled 0 Driven (Sandpoint) D Dug Did Material Settle After 24 Hours? D YesONo 0 Other (Specify) If Yes, Was Hole Retopped? D Yes0No


~ Unconsolidated Formation D Bedrock 0 Conductor Pipe-Gravity 0Conductor Pipe-Pumped D Dump Bailer D Other (Explain)

Total Well Depth (ft.) Casing Diameter (in.) _ ( 6) Sealing Materials For monitoring wells and (From groundsurlace) Casing Depth (ft.) -- D Neat Cement Grout monitoring well boreholes onl

0 Sand-Cement (Concrete) Grout Lower Drillhole Diameter (in.) D Concrete I 0 Bentonite Pellets

D Clay-Sand Sluny I I 0 Grartular Bentonite

Was Well Annular Space Grouted? DYes 0No D Unknowr D Bentonite-Sand Slurry : 0 Bentonite - Cement Grout If Yes. To What Depth? Feet D Chipped Bentonite I

(7) J.:lLQ. aros. C" 1 Mix Ratio Material Used To Fill Well/Drillhole From (Ft) To (Ft.) Sacks Se~ ( rrc e or Volume One) or Mud Weight

t;tU--vuLAA. D&Jro/1/' .c ,-c_ Surface 1.5 s-

(8} Comments:

(9)

00

D:':R /COUNTY

y


WELL/DRILLHOLE/BOREHOLE ABANDONMENT Form 3300-5B - ~ev. 3-94

All abandonment work shall be performed in accordance with the provisions of Chapters NR 111-, NR 112 or NR 141, Wis. Admin. Code, whichever is applicable. Also, see instructions on back.

(1) GENERAL INFORMATION (2) FACIUfY NAME

~Asoreholej I County Original Well Owner (If Known) Location ~,4vt.U- WLs..u~ ~LLL

~E:.. 1/4 of f'.ltJ 1/4 of Sec . .,)~; T. _::I_ N; R. ~E Present Well Owner

-11 []w tN.r:::s.c "r"Sd iS CLL-(If applicable) Slreet or Route

Gov't Lot Grid Number A)/7 W ,;2 tf s"" JZ~V&t..vlooD :D~, Grid Location C1ty, State. Zip Code

noN. D s .. no E. D w. u/ .A-Vk-L$/14 L (,.).C. 53Jil8 Civil Town Name racll1ty weu.No. ana1or .Name VI Appllcab!e) 'WI Unique Well No.

/'?.r:uJA c/ UL- 3-,.< Street Address of Well J{eason t-or Abandonment

ers- No£rf/ zs--i-~ s T~-r Cor"'J/teJ-G£1 6R~te_ City, Village Date o~banj,nment /YJ£W14v~ 1 /1.? ?2..

WELUDRILLHOLE/BOREHOLE INFORMATION (J) Original Well/~ole/Borehole Construction Completed On (4) Depth to Warer (Feet)

(Date) 1;./h~f;? Pump & Piping Removed? DYes 0 NoD Not Applicable • Liner(s) Removed? DYes ONo O Not Applicable

0 Monitoring Well Construction Report Available? Screen Removed? 0 Yes 0 NoD Not Applicable 0 Water Well DYes ~No Casing Left in Place? 0 Yes 0 No

~ Drillhole If No, Explain

Borehole Was Casing Cut Off Below Surface? O Yes 0No

Construction Type: Did Sealing Material Rise to Surface? D Yes0No ~ Drilled 0 Driven (Sandpoint) D Dug Did Material Settle After 24 Hours? O Yes ONo 0 Other (Specify) If Yes, Was Hole Retopped? 0 YesO No

FQrmation Type: (5) Required Method of Placing Sealing Material

_ro Unconsolidated Formation D Bedrock 0 Conductor Pipe-Gravity 0 Conductor Pipe-Pumped 0 Dump Bailer 0 Other (Explain)

Total Well Depth (ft.) Casing Diamerer (in.) _ ( 6) Sealing Materials For monitoring wells and (From groundsurface) Casing Depth (ft.) - 0 Neat Cement Grout monitoring well boreholes onl

0 Sand-Cement (Concrete) Grout Lower Drillhole Diameter (in.) 0 Concrete I 0 Bentonite Pellets

0 Clay-Sand Slurry I

0 Granular Bentonite I

Was Well Annular Space Grouted? 0 Yes 0No 0 Unknown 0 Bentonite-Sand Slurry I 0 Bentonite - Cement Grout I If Yes. To What Depth? Feet 0 Chipped Bentonite I

(7) ~, __r__aras. • I Mix Ratio Material Used To Fill Well/Drillhole From (Ft) To (Ft.) l(<>~.±c:- Sealanj) (Crrc e or Volume One) or Mud Weight

C~.-JuLAd_ DfC rJro~..CrL SurfaCe 13 1

(!i) Comments:

(9)

ONR/COUNTY

y

State of Wisconsin _ Depa.rt.ffient of)'latural Resources

WELL/DRILLHOLE/BOREHOLE ABANDONMENT Form 3300-SB - Rev. 3-94


TlJ GENERAL INFORMATION (2) FAOUTY NAME

~riiitrtrte/;3orehole\ I County Original Well Owner (If Known) Location /IJ :J2W /lviCCC- w.r=~ C.o .-Js c.J E ELL

S.E:- 1/4 of JJvJ 1/4 of Sec. .:2 ~ ; T. 7 N;R. ;JI ~: Present Well Owner

LJ..c~,J~cJ IS cu._ (If applicable) Street or Koute

Gov't Lot Grid Number J..Jn uJcJ'-/3tJo t2.r=~L.J -P" D 7:::::e_. Grid Location City, State. Lip Code

nON. 0 s., no E. D W. WAul~c;HA uJ.c ~3JM Civil Town Name racuu:y Well .No. and/or .Name VI AppHcable),Wl Unique Well No.

j11:ac..J A1.i /(.C~ '"&-3 Street Address of Well Reason .ror Abandonment 8~~ r-)<)!Zfr/ 3~!,~ ~-ru.t:-1 6!'1 f'L£r6'::> -:;s f1£.C.J-foL£._

Tity, -village Date of m~ent JYl.CW A~UL. V6 1.2

WELUDRILLHOLE/BOREHOLE INFORMATION -(3) Original Well/Drillhole/Borehole Construction Completed On (4) Depth to WatJ:r (Feet)

(Date) CJ/J~/9:G Pump & Piping Removed? 0 Yes 0 NoD Not Applicable Liner(s) Removed? 0 Yes ONo 0 Not Applicable

0 Monitoring Well Construction Report Available? Screen Removed? 0 Yes 0 Noo Not Applicable 0 Water Well 0 Yes DNo Casing Left in Place? 0 Yes 0 No 0 Drillhole If No, Explain

00 Borehole Was Casing Cut Off Below Surface? O Yes 0No

Construction Type: Did Sealing Material Rise to Surface? 0 YesONo El Drilled 0 Driven (Sandpoint) 0 Dug Did Material Settle Mter 24 Hours? O YesONo 0 Other (Specify) If Yes, Was Hole Retopped? 0 Yes0No


~ Unconsolidated Formation D Bedrock D Conductor Pipe-Gravity 0 Conductor Pipe-Pumped 0 Dump Bailer 0 Other (Explain)

Total Well Depth (ft.) Casing Diameter (in.) __ (6) Sealing Materials For monitoring wells and (From groundsurface) Casing Depth (ft.) -- D Neat Cement Grout monitoring well boreholes onl

0 Sand-Cement (Concrete) Grout Lower Drillhole DiametJ:r (in.) D Concrete I D Bentonite Pellets

I D Clay-Sand Sluny 1 0 Granular Bentonite Was Well Annular Space Grouted? 0 Yes 0No 0 Unknown 0 Bentonite-Sand Sluny : 0 Bentonite- Cement Grout

If Yes, To What Depth? Feet 0 Chipped Bentonite I

(7) .NJ1. . I'ards. . Mix Ratio Material Used To Fill Well}Drillhole From (Ft.) To (Ft.) I JSags Sealant) (Crrcle orj[olume One) or Mud Weight

G /ZA.NI./1--A r<_ 73 t:,.J ro ,.J,r rc_ Surface Is:' s-

(!S) Comments:

(9)

DNR/COU!'ITY

y

State of Wisconsin Department ~ Natural R!!Sources

WELLIDRILLHOLE/BOREHOLE ABANDONMENT Form 3300-5B c Rev. 3-94


(l) GENERAL INFORMATION (2) FAOUTY NAME

WeH!DHHhele!U'iorehole) 'County /fJ.12£);1Lift£& Original Well Owner (If Known) Location tJ .:esc o,Jsc.j ~ 6LL-

J ~E Present Well Owner <;.t=:_l/4 of N 1/4ofSec. 2~; T._2_N;R . .;7/ Ejw tJ.r=Sr::..P ,Js,. c:J 6cLL (If applicable) Street or Koute

Gov't Lot Grid Number N/7 W~'/3oo ;'ZI:vce..t.J~D 7){2_, Grid Location City, State. Zip Code

ftQ N. 0 s., rtO E. 0 w. P-4Ukc.:s.40 ub=: .$".31~'8 Civil Town Name l'B~?u .No. am11or .Name (11 Appucabte) IWI Unique Well No.

;11r:L.V A cJ UL Street Address of Well

~61. Reason .for Abandonment

&~.s- ;V#~rtl .s,,.-~-,- brrJI'Le.re.o B~IU..J-!~t,L City, Village ~

f"'?.:CL/,J /ftl. Date~ A1~mnent 9J~? 12. WELUDRILLHOLEIBOREHOLE INFORMATION

(3) Original Well/~~~;orehole C~nstruction Completed On (4) Depth to Wa.ter (Feet)

(Date) 7/J'J CJ2 Pump & Piping Removed? O Yes 0 NoD Not Applicable Liner(s) Removed? O Yes ONo 0 Not Applicable

0 Monitoring Well construction Rez{ Available? Screen Removed? 0 Yes 0No0 Not Applicable 0 Water Well 0 Yes No Casing Left in Place? 0 Yes O No 0 Drillhole If No, Explain

J8] Borehole Was Casing Cut Off Below Surface? O Yes 0No

Construction Type: Did Sealing Material Rise to Surface? 0 YesONo a Drilled 0 Driven (Sandpoint) 0Dug Did Material Settle After 24 Hours? O Yes 0No Other (Specify) If Yes, Was Hole Retopped? 0 Yes0No


,EJ Unconsolidated Formation D Bedrock 0 Conductor Pipe-Gravity 0 Conductor Pipe-Pumped 0 Dump Bailer 0 Other (Explain)

Total Well Depth (ft.) Casing Diameter (in.) _ (6) Sealing Materials For monitoring wells and (From groundsurface) Casing Depth (ft.) - 0 Neat Cement Grout monitoring well boreholes onl

0 Sand-Cement (Concrete) Grout Lower Drillhole Diameter (in.) 0 Concrete 1 0 Bentonite Pellets

0 Clay-Sand Slcny I 1 0 Granular Bentonite

Was Well Annular Space Grouted? D Yes 0No 0 UnknoWil 0 Bentonite-Sand Slurry : 0 Bentonite - Cement Grout If Yes, To What Depth? Feet 0 Chipped Bentonite I

(7) _flla. L~ra~. . Mix Ratio Material Used To Fill Well/Drillhole From (Ft) To (Ft) lf~eal~(Crrcle

or Volume One) or Mud Weight

C tCA-JuLA;e_ 6b.J-nJ _,_);::: rc_ Surfaee ;2-5" e

(~} Comments:

(9)

0

DNR/COUNTY

y

APPENDIX H

Methanol Material Safety Data Sheet

I:Ac:J.~:-l'IC:IIL:Il •:IIVlllllliiiY.ll'l'lol. lii:HVICIW J6 n.:r. Tllliiii:J.J. ur.vn., 1:1-ll'r

Hll.Hl, OK 7~351-JJOJ

Halcrial Hafcty Dnln. Ghuul

!'biJU 1 0! )

--- ----~- -~-~---- --·--·---·-·-- --·--~ =~--------------- - - -=-=~===

IWulc: 8l~.o1,l SJ-..Ct"5 ••t not ptlniiiU·•I. l~"'•·l•tr ~'"" Uhl "'' lo~:d .,~ ••~tl Dfplh.at.lr, ""no lnl••fll.o~tlon h

__ _1~··-~!~-~~'-'~~~- ___ .. ----- ----~! ~~~~:!..!~nJit•lt t~at. If 11ny 11~·1'1 h f'OI IIIVI.IIIIIJ(C' 1 the l.flU.I:

l'ago 2 at

Halorlal Gately Data Ghoot (Cont'd.)

'================================================·=========== V ~:ri~AC~iVITi DATA

Cou.Jil Ions to Avoid

Sta..Uillty lleat, sparks, <p:n fl;:m.!, qn1 a.Jltaile~."!i, t\ld [_(_()(' \Ultila.ticn.,

ll,.f••p-•tlt,lllly (H:.Icrhla to hult.J) 1 ,, ,..., ........... ~· ........... . lu;tu•t•Y 1e.:lll~ .... ...: ,..,,,J .. :r ...!!l.H!m.Loxl!.ll.:hlll...lla!!n L.:Lilud...rJ£t.:!. h~!Ln~tnl.:ulll kluillLilisuLlcJLhY.l.l r:!W.!n...._ ________ _

J6 11 .. 1. Tuu•udl ll1vd., t; . .,.l . ! :' ~ ~ 1 --~ ~ !'.::-.. ~ ~'! L ___ ----------------

Ill; I ·1 ·1 ~> ·1 - )] 0) l,l,"c l'f'l'-lfhl: U/'.!(j/'J2 ---·-·-·--'"-····-

-------- -·---·---------

. ···-·- --· -··· ... - ..... ~;~!t t~tu~~ 1.-..... _JH:!:.:l!l.Ill!L~h.l!. ~.!.11!" lkl.h)" I A lc<•lo;,1

"'''u"L.ull oc:c,•·•••$ltlb1' ur UYJu·o..h:ta Incomplelu co1nbuullon can generate caclxm monoxitlc and other

_j LlX tc...JLl pm:s...sliCIL..as_foacu.Wc:lE'IL!. "a)' Occur COf~ltiOf\1 lo .Avoid ll1:1111rc.Jous -- ___ ::.__: _________________________ _

1'01

)'"':rhotlt•• ultl wot tk~ur x llcat, up:~rk!J, open fJanlO, open «..:ont,1l~=.!:~!-f:_lllt' \UIU!_~.!.~~"I

'.· s~::ciroi1 vir :..•. iiEJ\I.TJ( llllzi-.im PATA · · Sklnl

YL:j

~~lll::." of. ltU>lh, colli>[XX! , hunln.J ;nl ruh""'-1 to C}'CS ilnl Eldn.

""llul cc,...Jitt.... l'~ccludc from exposure Lhose lndlvhlu01ls wl th dl:;e<J~us of eyes, liver, -----··-----·--.. ···-v~~t .:.1\.J~!J,~L __________ _ ------------- __££~~Y #.99rov;~tc.-d lrt hpost,rc kidncys.._iliHLlunos~--------------------------

,. t'c•rJOll. I I I I'll y <- 1 ell 1 /CIIE1H cr r Clll\llliC'rE!li STICS.. · · · · · · : · · .· ' ..!!!!Y""'Y ""'' II rot Aid Proc«lores hhl1<>llm: luuullatcly nno-c to ftu.h air. If rut lnXllhllq, irluini!.-Lcr nmUI-l.o-

_'"il ~:~-;~~~-~ -- -- ~~- -----.. -.-~~:-.t:~~. ~--·-_: __ _i~~~~i!~~~-;::~ .. ~:.1. ~- (!llf\; ~-7'~2 ·--···--'---- uu•lh rw:m lrrothhrJ. If Uem Is ro p>1re <>:l•dnist.cr an. O.ntac.t ~li)'Sician lum.dlately. f)o a:11

t.-.:t: lllm:J

-~th uplou <o1n11W of wt.cr roc «l lntl 15mlllltm. O.:l Ull!I.lJ.n::y uu.llrnl a!iSist<uY.e. ~<In o.·Jil: .. .-><:.t• fhd1

-~.~~ .. ~-~~~"~~-~:·: ~'.!! .. ~1;~!1

·1

~~ .... ····• ~-··· '!? -·· -~~~~·~~~~---··-·· ··---=-2-U~----·------ tluturJt1y fcc l\t. l01!:jt 15rulruli.'fJ. \h!h LtCCu.""lo.l !;Jdn wllh U).lp urd W:1l.cr. 1\lnl'.e tUtl-~."Vnlr\ll..oJ clcA.hliTJ iUll !.ilu::i.

v .. ,._,r bu~ilt (AIIC ':" 1J (vi•J"H~otiuu ll..dc ------·--------- ... t. 11. !E~~!! .. ·~~!~~ ~ !!. ------~J _5______________ ULl1 c1olhlrJ] l.dcru n.~n:c, rurl dl,nm.l w>t.wdmlul tlo-"l. O..>t OICLlJ.:n:y uullrul =lst...:uu.!. IH_pstlm: Clll

Sol1Joi,1ly iu "'"'"-' lnul 1\lltl"n OutJol rnliC'r fnr.' n.o::ilrtl<u1H. 011bY.t Jh'f.ddi\n l1mnllatC!ly. fL'\\.>.r ln\.n! \uniLI•rJ nr 9hu il.nythl111 :·1~ f,rti_Ui"tiil•_·vll_lliiillhib:·Jlll·l til: 111VIIIl.CJ1Mil>IICI'{j; •. ····•·· ·,: ... ·•···· • ~-:·.-· . · . ·. .•: •OEC'l'ION -VII -:'l'lECAUTIONIJ~l'Oll 01\FI:l llliNDf,IIIO AND UO~.

Stqd to II: lwlcn In Cnse H;,tr:rlol I!_ Rclcnsc-4 or SpiUc.-d J~:ul...a.t-fmn..J.uli.UUL..-Jl.n.r...t"XJllcd·hp cl!thl.t.u_uti.Jt1Liuto~.J'._ __

-------- !lE:C'I'lOII lV- t'IHJ.: 1dH> EXI'I.O!JIOII JJJ\ZT,Illllli\Tll · ; .. __ .. :· o(\V<J\UI nL-plrilloCO:Ill[lll"lt. llll.Olb't>lllaluotcrl<lllnwlub:n:l:o•tro:nmtnWfocwl\a\to.plllson.liUlO.v

_ _'~:~:·;"'_'":•::·• u:::;,· ~~~:~~-.. ~~--.~;~·": .. ~ ~~~~~~)---~-] '_'::~~~~~:~~ 1 : 1 ':~~1:.~---~-~------_[ •u 36 ~ 5 -- tn il mf~ lcxntlm roc 1dlf~1{ o('fl.1.7.o:l nL'llo:ls. Dwlnllltnl.al fl'lllt a:nply w/ to:JIIulocy 10tlflrutlm lU!ll~\1 ht I,.J,.j.. 1111 ,.J H·:d•~~~ -~~~~!~;~l Hcthvd D sp::o: cl m:!Uuml as un l1V\ lnL.;:nt.ln3 \USL.c. ClJ)l:.oc..t slale utvimlllHL.ll lYJ.ll..."Y fcc

-~·..,,-~~'!!. ~j oxi ~~: ~. ~!~ L.!::~~:~~!~::!-~·- ~ !'.~!!~!!.!":'~! .. .'::!~~:I._·~! :!~.~L ! !.!.I:._ --------·-----·----------- • I 1!;\.IIIJ of I lcrnnl hn. \O!;le dlrp:rXll f;:v::llltla; E.. lUJllaLims. I!J:um\.u.>1·1Jsl.c N.l. 11151 illrl run (l~dl<•Jllc). ...J ~1"--c 111l I i •·c • i !Jhl I, .. J I'IL"-"'~'f\.:a

. ...!:!!!·H. lulL!ll!A!.:!:~ i Y!L!:l!..!Lhilt.J .'-'ld .1.:\.!1 L...-•.-lllJ iu:.:J.LL:.:.lLhin~ ul.'curi.ILU~ , __ liL:JLultL.lnli ILl __ _

__ pl·u~_:~.~=-~~~~:~!:...-~upl\~~-=~~~~.":~. ~!~~~:.~~~·:. l·ouLdnl..!r~. l~cl!p flru-•!:-:po~it.:d cnntairu.n·s coot ··-·····~--·--··-···--·-·--·----···--··--------------

'~~ ... , .. ,, tIt c- .w"l \ "~"'t.l""•' n .. 1 .. 111'

_ ~~~t ~-~~ ~~-=~ ~~~~~ ! '.'~! :..:1 ~~~~~.!. !~~~:· ... ! ~· ·:·' ~-·~ ~~: ~~ ~ ~ 1. ~ ~:;~' •_ : ~- ~~ ~~~~.: ~:.: l•,"_ u .1' '": .u \: ~x \' 1 l 1 .. ~~~~~ ,,,,u ( r t.L: J, 1ul•at

1 --~:!.~~.!!.::~.~):. ~~~~:~· :~!~'!.~_'!!'.~~·.~·'·.~·-~:; 1":.~! ~!~ '!'~: !.~·~!:_~!~~.!~~.!:.~!:!~~~!~-·~·~~-~~;1·!·1;!~!~~-~~~;~.! ~-~~~:~ ~~~~~~2!~~;---lrpl1••111•,,·;,

·--·-. --·-·-· ...:-··-··· _ ..... -·-~--~..: --~-· -··-· -·;__;,_:.:..;.;..;· .. ;.:~·.:-~\..:...:::~

..!!!!.~~7-~_h\cn _In U.lnt.llln'l o1w.J Uorlr)O) U.!UlJll2l._jj.!!.lld...l!:..DJJ1 yjnl finn l01P1}'!lt1lU (!>.1nflr~.:; ;url dhrr.t:. :!.!!..:._

1\q,,· t.ta;r_p of n"llumlm,:;t l:c d~l.c!.mlrul b"-'rl '" ollcr not.crla.1s !.-toru.l <nl Udr .lo:umll ruriJ~>lwtlal chnlm1 hn)•rulihtllly. Jn \JlY.!I"oJI, moULu'OI Llo11d 1-c o:;lonxl In ttn i:>cu.:p..ilb1c rxuto::\J.d ani ocouu Claun~lh!

-~!!~'.:~ !:!.!:!!!!~U!!~.-{~L)_l~l!hl1.!!..!!·~.1tl111. l·ha!Hf u.y t.')\! ul!.h rc.u\l1dn<J onJ s:art1ly !lrJ.ua ~huh\ \u UV.Jlli.~hl•!

J~-~~i vldni~~'"'Y ~~L1.11 C!l<jUJII\l. (;(Hill <Ylllulludol nulall("s In mlnl111I<:U "laLic 'P''I~l.

I'l\<)f) J o( J

Hnterinl 110\Coty lll\tn Ohoot (Cont 1 cl.)

'====~==~==~=~=~-=--~-=-··=-=··=--=--=-··=-·~--=···~--=·=-:~"··--~--~~-~-~-~·-··-····

Gf.Cl'lOII VIII - C0111'1\0l. llf.IIOUJ\f.ll

lurloatory rrot..:tlon lSp.-clfy IYJ"'llln ~[p.t.M.,IlU,>lt<tlU: l~fll[lllllt. rbl\1>1 Nlllll ;uJI !\}olputol IIIUJo[,, \nn•r'!l

!!:Q 111rro r l1llq YJ tJu,l..;1.cnn!.!!'~PJ.VX . ..!J·J.lll.nr.tlt ;_i:I1J::J.1.u:lfy 1ru • ...ill ~.u.lllnl._u:_:..l.!IL w.ol<ll uxll.J.u.olhiJ Q. illllll.<llm ._

lt~<al hJ'"'"tl\llr.r \'l.llti lilt leu to nr:ct Sprcl•l '1\.V rntolmonot:;.

"cd•onlcol (CetM:nl) I\Y1,r.r \UitlJullat lo rrcct 1LV rrrplmomls.

Olh~r

W~~----·----· ·-···-·-------

£ye rrol«llon

________ r_tx_P_~_• e_, _1_11_Lr:_1_11

_! _n_~_J_r.r...:·c.....oc_r_,_H_J'_~_. _____ L!;S!-"a!.!r~e..!<L...!t!Jl.!ifi!l~L.llQ<J<J l,g11 .. illl~Lf.!!r:f.l..Jlh I !l.l !"J._ rrolt-ctlve Cloves

oohcr rroo«:llv. cloohl"2 "' £~"""' Indi vlcluills "ho are acutely illld sped r lcapy_ErD!il!J..Y.~l-·"--··-· ...

methanol o•1Y re<]ul re add! tlonal protect! ve cqul pment.

ua.l/lfr?lrnlc r<o<llcu Kec~J.l£11 flames, SJ2!1rks or other ls1nl t ion "O"L£'l'L.!1!:'il.Y_,_fl\uw.t_,1 UQ!/ ____ _

0>1tcrlal to contaminate sewers or wutcr sources • • I j, i li + F .... 8 » I C J ~AIW 10 H.j:QA,.~··T• , • ....,...~;;~.~··~••~•~·=<T<,O~.~.~·~· r~~~~~

Note: Judgements os to tho sultohlll.ty o( l:lor. lnformntion horoln (or pun.:honot·•n 1""1'"':<' 111·,,

nocessorlly purchnsct·• s rcr:q>onr:lhlll ty. 'l'hcrc(ore, olthough re<:~son<:~blc care hor. been t<:~kcn in the prcpnr<:~tion of such informotion, EnglePicher Environmentol Services extonds no wnrrantics, rnnkes no rapreacntntlon5, nnU nsratmcs no responsibility as to the accur:ocy or suit<~bllity of such informotion to purchoscr' r. intcnclc<l purposes or for conscqllcnccs o ( i l:s usc.

I"

APPENDIX I

Head Space Sampling Procedure

Professional Service Industries ========================::::;,

Field Screenings

Field screening for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) was performed at each sample interval. The headspace above each sample was screened with an HNU Model PI-101 PID. The PID was equipped with a 10.2 electron volt lamp. The PID is calibrated prior to use at each project by PSI personnel. The calibration procedure includes introduction of a known concentration of isobutylene gas into the instrument. Isobutylene is used because of similarity to the volatile aromatic compound benzene. The calibration of the instrument is completed by adjusting the span until the indicator exhibits 57 units. The date of the last factory calibration of the PID was April 10, 1990. The manufacturer indicates that the sensitivity of the device is 1 part per million (ppm) for volatile organic compounds (VOC's) which have an ionization potential equal to or less than its lamp energy ( 10.2 e V). The calibrated PID is used to detect organic vapors in comparison to the isobutylene standard. The PID displays instrument units which are comparable to concentrations in parts per million (ppm). Due to the inexact volume of the headspace and varying soil conditions, PID readings should only be considered a relative indication of volatile organic compound concentrations. The moisture content of soil and humid atmospheric conditions have been noted to produce falsely elevated organic vapor readings due to condensation on the lamp.

To perform the screening, the soils were placed in glass sample jars, sealed with aluminum foil and permitted to equilibrate at ambient temperatures for about five (5) to ten (10) minutes, based upon ambient outside air temperatures greater than 55 degrees F. The maximum instrument readings were taken by inserting the probe through the foil into the headspace. Results of the screening are shown on the individual boring logs in the Appendix.

APPENDIX J

PAH Analytical Summary

Professional Service Industries ===========================il

PAH ANALYTICAL SUMMARY

Pol~nuclear Aromatic H~drocarbons (PAH) (Iwb) ANALYTE B-1 ( 6.5' -8.5') B-3 (9'-11') B-4 (13'-15') B-4 (23'-25')

Acenapthene ND ND ND 640 Acenapthylene ND ND ND ND Anthracene ND ND ND 250 Benzo( a)anthracene 66 53 43 130 Benzo(a)pyrene 74 29 30 230 Benzo(b )flouranthene 67 34 ND 160 Benzo(k)flouranthene 58 44 ND 170 Benzo(ghi)perylene ND ND ND ND Chrysene 97 ND 17 ND Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene ND ND ND ND Fluoranthene 250 103 85 510 Fluorene ND ND ND 170 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ND ND ND ND Napthalene ND ND ND 42 Phenanthrene 183 78 41 680 Pyrene 229 116 73 410

" ,


George E. Meyer Secretary

August 4, 1993

Mr. Jeff Haas Wisconsin Bell Nl7 W24300 Riverwood Drive 1st Floor Waukesha, Wisconsin 53188

Dear Mr. Haas:

Southeast District - Annex Building Poat Office Box 12436

4041 N. Richards St . . Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53212

TELEPHONE: 414·961-2727 TELEFAX #: 414-961·2770

Fdt Ref: 4400-2600

RE: Underground Storage Tank located at the Wisconsin Bell Billing Center 845 N. 35th Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin

The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) acknowledges the receipt on May 10, 1993 of the "Site Contamination Assessment" report which was submitted on your behalf by your consultant Professional Service Industries, Inc. (PSI). The WDNR has recently reviewed the case file pertaining to the above-referenced site.

Work Conducted

On August 5, 1992 a 6,000-gallon Fuel Oil underground storage tank (UST) was abandoned by_ removal. According to PSI, there were no visible signs of holes in the tank or lines. The backfill soils appeared to be contaminated at the base and sidewalls of the excavation. Groundwater, pocessing a petroleum sheen, filled the excavation. A waste'characterization sample was collected on August 16, 1992 and was submitted for laboratory analysis on August 20, 1992.

A request to incinerate approximately 115 cubic yards of contaminated soils at the Payne & Dolan's asphalt plant was submitted to the WDNR and approved on September 4, 1992 by LUST project Manager, Candice Lindstrom, and Michael Griffin of the WDNR Air Management section.

On September 16 and 17, 1993 four so.il borings were installed at the site (Bl- B4). Soil samples were collected from the soil borings, subjected to field screening using a HNU Model PI-101 PID with a lamp strength of 10.2 eV. Two soil samples from each soil boring were submitted to a laboratory for analysis of TPH as Diesel Range Organics (DRO), Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH's) and Petroleum Volatile Organic Compounds (PVOC's).

•

Mr. Haas - Wisconsin Bell Billing Facility Page 2

According to the Boring Site Plan, located in the "Site Contamination Assessment" report, over-excavation of the contaminated soil occurred on October 5, 1992. According to the "Application to Treat or Dispose of Petroleum Contaminated Soil Asphalt Plant or Other Type of Thermal Treatment Unit" (Form 4400-149), 55.15 tons (approximately 161 cubic yards) of contaminated soil was transported on October 27, 1992 to Payne & Dolan's asphalt plant in Sussex, Wisconsin. The contaminated soils were treated on November 23, 1992. Also according to the Boring Site Plan, six soil samples (Sl-S6) were collected from the over-excavation.

On October 12, 1992 three soil borings were installed and subsequently converted to groundwater monitoring wells MWl, MW2 & MW3. Groundwater samples were collected and submitted for laboratory analysis of DRO, PAR's, and Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs).

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Upon review of the case file the WDNR has the following questions, issues and/or documents which.need to be answered, clarified, and/or submitted for review:

1. Exactly when were the 55.15 tons of contaminated soils over-excava·ted? Were the soils over-excavated during the removal of the tank or were they over-excavated during the month of October?

2. The Boring Site Plan shows the collection location for each of the six soil samples collected from the excavation. However, the "Site Contamination Assessment" report is lacking information regarding the samples themselves. Of interest to the WDNR is the following:

a) Please have your consultant submit data indicating the depth at which each sample was collected.

b) The laboratory analysis for each of the six soil samples are missing from the report. Please have your consultant submit this information for WDNR review.

c) Please submit the chain of custody form for the six soil samples.

3. On the Boring Site Plan, PSI shows an approximate excavation limit. The approximate excavation limit is dated 10/5/92. It appears that six soil samples (Sl - S6) were collected at the time of the over-excavation. 55.15 tons of contaminated soil (check off as gravel) were taken to the Payne & Dolan asphalt plant.

- What were the final dimensions of the excavation?

Mr. Haas - Yiscons'in Bell Billing Facility Page 3

3. According to the.Boring Site Plan, PSI shows that the three soil borings Bl, B2, and B3 were converted to groundwater monitoring wells. The soil borings ware installed en September 16 & 17, 1992. According to the monitoring well construction forms for groundwater monitoring wells MWl, MW2, & MW3, these wells were constructed on October 12, 1992.

- The soil boring logs, monitoring wells construction forms, and monitoring well development forms pertaining to these three wells must be submitted for WDNR review.

4. Please explain the discrepancy between the Boring Site Plan and the date of installation for the groundwater monitoring wells.

a) The Boring Site Plan shows soil borings Bl, B2, and B3 as groundwater monitoring wells MWl, MW2, & MW3.

b) The monitoring well construction forms indicate that the wells were installed on October 12, 1992. The four soil borings Bl-B4 were installed in September 1992.

c) On page 6 of the "Site Contamination Assessment" report, it is stated that "upon completion of the test borings they were properly abandoned by backfilling them with bentonite.

Overall, this indicates to the WDNR that all soil borings installed on September 16 & 17, 1992 were.abandoned, and that on or around October 12, 1992 three additional borings were installed and converted to groundwater monitoring wells. If this is the case, then the WDNR is requiring that you submit a revised map indicating the exact locations of all soil borings and groundwater monitoring wells which have been installed at the location.

5. According to the above-referenced report, groundwater monitoring well MWl was completed as a dry well. This well must be abandoned according to provisions outlined in Wisconsin Administrative Code NR 141. Upon abandonment of MWl, the proper well abandonment form must be submitted to the WDNR.

6. The abandonment forms for all soil borings installed at the site are missing from the case file. Please have your consultant submit the proper forms.

7. Groundwater samples were collected from groundwater monitoring wells MWl, MW2 & MW3. Acetone and Methylene Chloride appeared in samples collected from MW2, MW3 and in the trip blank .

. a) Please explain where the Acetone and Methylene Chloride are coming from. b) How was the trip blank collected?


8. On page 9 of the "Site Contamination Assessment" report it is stated that ."The well sampling equipment was decontaminated.prior to and be~wsen collecting samples deionized water rinse".

a) What was done with the waste generated from the decontamination procedures?

b) Please submit documentation indicating the percent concentration of methanol used during the decontamination procedure.

c) Please submit the Material Safety Data Sheet for the methanol used in the rinse.

9. The headspace sampling procedure for soil samples collected and analyzed at the site was not included in the report. Please submit.written documentation describing the hea~space sampling procedures.

10. Please provide a description of the investigative waste handling procedures. Include soil cuttings from drilling activities, wash water and any other. investigative wastes generated.

11. On page 14 of the "Site Contamination Assessment" PSI shows a Summary of Analytical Tests table. Listed on this table. are the soil samples collected, the depth below ground surface from which it was collected from, and the analyte analyzed/detected. Of particular interest is the area depicting the PAH's. According to this table, the analytes were detected in parts per million (ppm) however according to the laboratory analytical results the analytes were detected in parts per billion (ppb). Please have your consultant look into this matter and, if needed, submit a revised Summary table.

12. On page 16 of the "Site Contamination Assessment" report, PSI states "it is estimated that about one hundred (100) cubic yards of contaminated soil remain at this site." The Boring Site Plan depicts the estimated extent of contaminated soils above 100 ppm.

a) Is the estimated 100 cubic yards of contaminated soils remaining in place indicative of the soils.contaminated above 100 ppm?

b) how was this estimate determined?

OVERVIEW

Until the analytical results for the soil samples collected in the overexcavation are submitted and the above requested information is submitted for WDNR review, the WDNR can not concur with the recommendations of PSI for further groundwater monitoring or passive hie-remediation at this point in

. ~


time. Upon submittal of this information, the WDNR will again review the case file.

PSI is recommending a passive-bioremediation system to remediate the remaining contaminated soil at the site. An enhanced bio-remediation approach such as stockpiling the soil and treating the soils with bio-enhancers is recommended due to the "very stiff or hard silty clay soil". With this in mind, the WDNR has these brief comments:

a) According to the soil boring logs for soil borings Bl, B2, B3, and B4, the soil is intermixed with sands and gravels.

b) Adding enhanced bio-enhancers to stockpiled soils is not considered by the WDNR to be a passive form of bio-remediation.

Prior to approval for a bio-remediation approach to remediate the rema1.n1.ng contaminated soils, a detailed workplan must be submitted to the WDNR for approval. In addition to this, the WDNR strongly suggests that a copy of the WDNR Natural Biodegradation as a Remedial Action Option - Interim Guidance be obtained. The number that you can call to· obtain a copy of this document is (608) 264-6009.

If you have any questions pertaining to the above letter or the case as a whole, please feel free to contact me at the above address or call at (414) 961-2735.

Sincerely, WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

·~~~ Candice Lindstrom Hydro geologist

cc: SED - Case File Steven R. Koester - PSI

r;;:uJ;;J ~~


Mr. Jeff Haas Wisconsin Bell N 17 W24300 Riverwood Drive 1st Floor Waukesha, Wisconsin 53188

Dear Mr. Haas:

January 29, 1993 ~ ~ Agno

tlA'l 1 0 I ~"

Re: Site Contamination Assessment Wisconsin Bell Billing Center Milwaukee, Wisconsin PSI File Number: 052-24033

In accordance with your request, Professional Service Industries, Inc. (PSI) has performed a Site Contamination Assessment at the above referenced site and is forwarding two (2) copies of the report.

PSI appreciates the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. We would be pleased to continue our role as environmental consultants during the project implementation, and remain available to answer any comments or questions you may have concerning this report. If we can be of further assistance, please contact us.

SRKjcas cc: DILHR

Wisconsin DNA

Respectfully submitted, PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC.

~ ;(. J{~dUv;~ Steven R. Koester Department Manager Geotechnical/Environmental Services

a. on~/cv .c.---,...,.":"~ En ir n ntal Author

av1 . Barndt, P. E. District Manager

2050 South Calhoun Road • New Berlin, WI 53151-2216 • Phone: 414/782-1600 • Fax: 414/782-1603

r.==== Professional Service Industries =====================il

SITE CONTAMINATION ASSESSMENT

WISCONSIN BELL BILLING CENTER

MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN

PREPARED FOR

WISCONSIN BELL

N17 W24300 RIVERWOOD DRIVE

1ST FLOOR

WAUKESHA, WISCONSIN 53188

PREPARED BY

PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC.

PITISBURGH TESTING LABORATORY DIVISION

r.==== Professional Service Industries =====================::::;,

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION Authorization.......................................................................... 1 \ 11/arranty................................ ........................... .. ........ ..... ... .. . 1 Project Background............................................................... 2 Purpose........... ................................................................... 3 Site Description...................................................................... 4

SCOPE OF SERVICES Field Program....... ................. .. ......................................... ..... 4 Field Screenings............. .... .. .......... .... ..................... .............. 6 Groundwater Monitoring Wells.......................................... .. .. 7 Chemical Analyses Program... .. ...... .. ............ .. ... .... .. .............. 10

FINDINGS Subsurface Soil Conditions....................................... ....... ... ... 10 Groundwater Conditions....... ......................................... ..... ... 12 Field Screening............................ ... .. .................. ..... .... ........ .. 13

LABORATORY ANALYSES Soil Analyses.................... ...................................................... 13 Groundwater Analyses........................................................... 15

EVALUATION AND CONCLUSIONS Soil Discussion...... ................................................................. 16 Groundwater Discussion... ..... .......... .... ......... ..... ... .. .......... ..... 17

REMEDIATION ACTION PLAN DISCUSSION Site Remediation Considerations.. ... ..................................... . 18 Soil Remediation... .... ..................... .. ...................................... 18 Soil Removal and Restoration..... .. .......... .. ... ... .. .............. ....... 20

APPENDIX USGS Topographic Map General Site Plan Boring Site Plan Soil Boring Logs Monitoring Well Construction Logs - DNR Form 4400-113A, 4400-113B Table I Table II Laboratory Analytical Data Chain-of-Custody Forms Tank Inventory Form SBD-7437 Tank Closure Form SBD-8951 Application for Soil Treatment Form 4400-149 Soil Manifest DNR Letter of August 28, 1993

rr=== Professional Service Industries =======================il

INTRODUCTION

This report documents the observations, field procedures, analytical results,

ccnc!usicns, and recommendations for a Site Contamination Assessment at the

Wisconsin Bell Billing Center, in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. This assessment was

performed at the request of Wisconsin Bell in response to a release of petroleum

hydrocarbons discovered during the removal of one (1) underground storage tank

(UST) systems at this site. This assessment is intended to fulfill the requirements

of a site investigation report and development of remedial action plan as required

by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR).

Authorization

Authorization to perform this assessment was given by Mr. Jeff Haas, in

accordance with the terms and conditions of PSI's Proposal No. 052-0901, dated

September 3, 1992.

Warranty

The field observations, measurements, and analyses reported herein are

considered sufficient in detail and scope to form a reasonable basis for a Phase

Ill Petroleum Hydrocarbon Contamination Assessment and development of a

remedial action plan in the immediate area of the previously existing tanks. The

findings and conclusions contained herein have been prepared in accordance with

the local generally accepted environmental engineering methods, as they relate to

the site as described in this report. The Phase Ill Assessment has been developed

to provide the client with information regarding the environmental conditions

described herein. It is necessarily limited to the conditions observed and to the

1

r.=== Professional Service Industries =====================~

information available at the time the work was performed.

Due to the limited nature of the work, there is a possibility that conditions

may exist which could not be identified within the scope of the assessment, or

which were not apparent at the time of this investigation. It is also possible that

the testing methods and/or other applicable guidelines, regulations, etc. utilized at

the time the report was prepared may later be superseded. The description, type,

and composition of what are commonly referred to as "hazardous materials or

conditions", can also change over time. PSI does not accept responsibility for

changes in the state of the art, nor for changes in the scope of various lists of

hazardous materials, conditions, guidelines, regulations, etc. PSI believes that the

findings and conclusions provided in this report are reasonable. However, no

warranties are implied or expressed.

Project Background

On August 5, 1992, a 6,000-gallon fiberglass underground storage tank

(UST) was removed by Illingworth Corporation. Prior to their removal, the tank had

been previously pumped of the uel oil product. he sludge materials were

removed and the tanks were cleaned at the site prior to disposal by National Tank

Service. There were no visible signs of holes in the tank or lines.

Visual observation of the tank excavation indicated contaminated backfill

soils at the base and sidewalls of the excavation. The extent of contaminated soils

could not be readily determined at the time of the removal.

Groundwater was present in the excavation at a depth of approximately

eight (8) feet below ground surface (bgs) and a petroleum sheen was present on

the surface of the water. It could not be determined at the time of the removal if

2

r.=== Professional Service Industries ========================il

the groundwater was a perched type groundwater within the tank backfill or the

prevailing groundwater level within this area.

Soils which were removed from the excavation were placed upon and

covered with plastic sheeting on the Wisconsin Bell site. These soils have

subsequently been thermally treated at Payne & Dolan's plant in Sussex,

Wisconsin. The manifests can be found in the Appendix of this report.

Purpose

The purpose of this Site Contamination Assessment was to estimate the

horizontal and vertical extent of petroleum affected soils in the general area of the

previously existing tank. In addition, a series of groundwater monitoring wells were

installed to evaluate if the groundwater, within a relatively close proximity to the

tanks, had been impacted due to the prior release. Based upon results of this

assessment, potential remedial action alternatives were to be provided for

Wisconsin Bell, WDNR and DILHR considerations.

The exploration was generally structured to assess subsurface geology and

the presence of hydrocarbon contamination at select sample locations, and was

not intended to be inclusive for all potentially hazardous substances. Additionally,

it was not intended to assess other portions of the site where underground storage e::::£../- -H---

tanks are present. The Assessment was performed in general accordance with

Wisconsin Department of Industry, Labor, and Human Relations (DILHR) and

Department of Natural Resources (DNR) guidelines existing at the time of the work.

3

rr:::=== Professional Service Industries =====================~

Site Description

The project site is located at 845 North 35th Street, in Milwaukee,

Wisconsin. It lies in the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 25,

Township 07 North and Range 21 East in Milwaukee County, Wisconsin. The

property is currently utilized as an office building. All major utilities, including the

municipal water and sewer system, service the facility. The area of the tank, and

of this assessment, is located just south of the billing center building, which is the

northern most building on the site. This area is relatively level, covered with

asphalt pavement and is utilized as a parking area.

The general area of the Wisconsin Bell facility is surrounded by residential,

industrial and commercial property. No review of the area LUST sites was

performed; however, an Environmental Investigation appeared to be performed on

a site just east of 35th Street, approximately five hundred (500) feet east of the

Wisconsin Bell site.

SCOPE OF SERVICES

Field Program

The Phase Ill Assessment at this site incorporated a phased approach and

was performed on September 16th and 17th and October 1992, under the

supervision of a PSI engineer. The field exploration included the performance of

four (4) Standard Penetration Test (SPT) borings to depths of approximately

thirteen (13) to twenty-five and one-half (25.5) feet below the existing ground

surface, and installation of three (3) groundwater monitoring wells. Soil and

4

r.==== Professional Service Industries ========================;1 groundwater samples were collected for analytical testing. Soil samples were also

~ '6· screened in the field. \~~7

A truck-mounted CME-55 drill rig equipped with a rotary head and

conventional hollow-stem augers was used to advance the test borings. Soil

samples were collected from near the surface to the full depth of each boring using

a split-barrel sampler. Auger cuttings from the drilling process were incorporated

into the soils, stockpiled on-site, and were subsequently subject to off-site

treatment.

Prior to the field exploration, the augers and down-hole sampling equipment

and working end of the drilling rig were decontaminated with a high pressure hot

water (HPHW) rinse in conjunction with hand scrubbing. The split-barrel sampler

was decontaminated with an Alconox water wash and potable water rinse between

each use. These cleaning procedures were used to reduce the possibility of cross

contamination between samples and boring/well locations.

The borings/monitoring wells were laid out by the project engineer at the

approximate locations shown on the attached site plan. Distances from the

referenced features to the boring locations are approximate. Angles for measuring

the distances to the borings were estimated and the locations of the borings

should be considered accurate to within a few feet. The location of the test

borings was somewhat restricted on the east by underground utilities.

The ground surface elevation was obtained at each test boring location by

PSI personnel utilizing conventional leveling techniques. The elevations are shown

on the boring logs located in the Appendix. The elevations were referenced to an

on-site temporary bench mark designated with an arbitrary elevation of 100.00 feet. - - I. 1 ¥ ~y-: k.

w~o»

r.==== Professional Service Industries =======================il

The southeast corner of the existing entry to the billing center building was utilized

as the temporary bench mark and an elevation of six hundred ninety (690) feet

MSL was interpolated from a USGS 7.5 minute topographic map.

Upon completion of the test borings they were properly abandoned by

backfilling them with bentonite.

Field Screenings

Field screening for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) was performed at

each sample interval. The headspace above each sample was screened with an 9.QJ c\

HNU Model Pl-101 PID. The PID was equipped with a 10.2 lectron volt lamp.

The PID is calibrated prior to use at each project by PSI personnel. The calibration

procedure includes introduction of a known concentration of isobutylene gas into

the instrument. lsobutylene is used because of similarity to the volatile aromatic

compound benzene. The calibration of the instrument is completed by adjusting

the span until the indicator exhibits 57 units. The date of the last factory calibration

of the PID was April1 0, 1990. The manufacturer indicates that the sensitivity of the

device is 1 part per million (ppm) for volatile organic compounds (VOC's) which

have an ionization potential equal to or less than its lamp energy (10.2 eV). The

calibrated PID is used to detect organic vapors in comparison to the isobutylene

standard. The PID displays instrument units which are comparable to

concentrations in parts per million (ppm). Due to the inexact volume of the

headspace and varying soil conditions, PID readings should only be considered

a relative indication of volatile organic compound concentrations. The moisture

content of soil and humid atmospheric conditions have been noted to produce

falsely elevated organic vapor readings due to condensation on the lamp.

6

r.=== Professional Service Industries ========================;] To perform the screening, the soils were placed in glass sample jars, sealed

with aluminum foil and permitted to equilibrate at ambient temperatures for about

five (5) to ten (1 0) minutes, based upon ambient outside air temperatures greater

than 55 degrees F. The maximum instrument readings were taken by inserting the

probe through the foil into the headspace. Results of the screening are shown on

the individual boring logs in the Appendix.J'

Groundwater Monitoring Wells

To assess the potential impact of the petroleum hydrocarbon release in the

immediate area of the Assessment, three (3) monitoring wells were installed on

October 12, 1992 in general conformance to NR140. The locations of the wells

were determined in the field by the PSI engineer based upon the subsurface

geological and hydrogeological conditions observed within the test borings, the

location of the tank systems and the results of preliminary laboratory tests. The

wells were positioned in an effort to evaluate the potential impact due to the prior

release and to evaluate the localized groundwater flow direction, if possible.

A truck-mounted CME-55 drill rig equipped with a rotary drilling head was

utilized and the bore holes were drilled with conventional six and one-quarter (6

1 /4) inch ID hollow stem augers. The larger augers were utilized to provide

adequate annulus space for placement of the sand filter pack around the well

screen. The augers and down-hole equipment were steam cleaned prior to the

start of work and between well locations to reduce the potential for cross-hole

contamination.

The wells were installed to depths ranging from eighteen and one-half (18.5)

feet to twenty (20) feet below the existing ground surface. The well screen

7

rr=== Professional Service Industries =====================~

consisted of two (2) inch nominal diameter, Schedule 40, flush-joint PVC having a

0.006 inch slot size. A two (2) inch nominal diameter solid stem riser was attached

to the well screen and extended to within about six (6) inches of the ground

surface. The borehole annulus was filled with fine sand filter pack (.2mm to .4mm)

to at least three and one-half (3.5) feet above the top of the well screen and an

approximate four (4) ±.foot thick bentonite seal was placed above the fine sand

filter pack. The wells were protected with flush-mounted manholes, which were

concreted in place, due to the relatively high exposure to vehicle traffic in the area.

All PVC screens and casings were new and were received on-site in new

condition and was wrapped in protective plastic. After removing the protective

wrap, the well screen and casing were lowered by hand through the hollow stem

auger. All field personnel utilized clean latex disposable gloves during the well

installation to decrease the potential for cross contamination. Specific well

construction details are presented in the Appendix.

The well screens were positioned to intersect the water table based on

water levels observed at the time of the drilling operations. At each well location,

the bore hole was over-drilled a few feet and backfilled with filter sand to the final

depth of the bottom of the well screen.

Monitoring wells MW-2 and MW-3 were initially purged and surged by bailing

for approximately forty-five (45) to sixty (60) minutes. Upon completion of the

bailing, water was removed from the wells until the field engineer determined that

the water turbidity was the best obtainable. The wells were allowed to recharge

and sampled by PSI personnel using a teflon bailer, in general accordance with

Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (DNR) guidelines. Groundwater

8

~== Professional Service Industries ========================;] samples were collected on October 16, 1992 from monitoring well number MW-2

and MW-3. The samples were collected with 1.5 inch O.D. teflon sampling bailers.

Disposable latex gloves were worn during sampling by all sample personnel.

Samples were collected by gently lowering the bailer into the water column and

collecting a sample from near the static water level. Samples were discharged

directly from the bailer into 40-ml glass sample vials with Teflon TM septa. No

headspace or air bubbles were introduced in the 40-ml samples. Samples were

sealed, labeled, and placed on ice for transport to PSI's analytical laboratory via

overnight courier. Chain-of-custody records were maintained and accompanied

the samples to the laboratory. Chain-of-custody records for groundwater samples

are presented in the Appendix. The well sampling equipment was decontaminated

prior to and between collecting samples with an Alconox wash and methanol and

deionized water rinse.

Monitoring well number MW-1 was dry; there~n\-e~ no groundwater sample ;(\w . x- ' - ....6-t:>

was obtained from this location. 0'~ oJD->->

Ground surface elevations and the elevations of the top of the well casings

(TOC) were determined by PSI personnel with a transit and rod and are shown on

Table I found in the Appendix. The elevations were referenced to the existing first

floor elevation, as indicated on the site plan in the Appendix. A reference elevation

of one hundred (1 00) feet was used for this datum. To estimate the groundwater

flow and direction, the depth to water was measured in each well on October 16,

1992. The measurements were collected using the surveyed notch, cut or marked

on the top of each well and measured to the nearest 0.01 feet. The depth to water

measurements, well head elevations, and groundwater elevation data are

9

r.==== Professional Service Industries =====================::::;,

summarized in Table I. In addition, all wells were visually checked for the presence

of free product using a decontaminated teflon bailer. No free phase product was

noted in any of the wells inspected on-site.

Chemical Analyses Program

Samples were analyzed in general accordance with the requirements

outlined in the Wisconsin DNR LUST Analytical Guidance document, PUBL-SW-

13092 REV, dated April 1992. Based upon reported past and present contents of

the tanks, the soil samples were analyzed for the following compounds:

- Diesel Range Organics (DRO) - Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) - Petroleum Volatile Organic Compounds (PVOC)

In accordance with the current DNR LUST guidance document, dated April

1992, a groundwater sample from monitoring wells MW-2 and MW-3 was analyzed

for the following:

- Diesel Range Organics (DRO) - Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) - Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

All of the samples were properly preserved and Standard Chain-of-Custody

documents were maintained. The analytical testing was performed by Professional

Service Industries, Inc. 0f'Jis. DNR #999819040) and copies of the results can be

found in the Appendix.

FINDINGS

Subsurface Soil Conditions

The types of subsurface materials encountered in the test borings were

visually classified in the field by the PSI engineer. Soils were described/classified

10

rr==== Professional Service Industries =======================il

in the field in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System ASTM

Standard D-2488. The results of the field penetration test, field screening,

laboratory tests and water level observations are presented on the boring logs.

Representative samples of the soils were placed in sample jars. They are stored

in the laboratory for further analysis, if desired. Unless notified to the contrary, all

samples will be disposed of after two (2) months.

The stratification of the soils, as shown on the boring logs, represents the

estimated soil conditions only in the actual boring locations, and other variations

may occur between and beyond these locations. Lines of demarcation represent

the approximate boundary between the soil types, but the transition may be

gradual.

It is to be noted that, whereas the test borings are drilled and sampled by

experienced drillers, it is sometimes difficult to record changes in stratification

within narrow limits, especially at greater depths. In the absence of foreign

substances, it is also difficult to distinguish between discolored soils and clean soil

fill.

The subsurface data obtained at the boring/well locations generally

indicates an upper layer of asphalt pavement and sand and gravel subbase to a

depth of about one (1) foot. The pavement section is generally underlain by

mottled brown, silty clay, to depths of four and one-half (4.5) feet. The mottled

brown clay was underlain by moist, gray, silty clay. These layers of silty clay

extend to at least the terminal depth of the borings. Borings B-1, B-2, and B-3

correspond relatively well to this idealized profile; however, boring B-4 which was

performed on the west side of a buried concrete utility vault, indicated fill soils to

11

r.=== Professional Service Industries =======================j'J

be present to the boring termination depth of twenty-five (25) feet (bgs). In

addition, a deposit of fill was also encountered at test boring B-1 under the

pavement section which extended to a depth of approximately nine (9) feet. No

petroleum odors or discolored soils were observed in any of the four (4) borings.

Groundwater Conditions

Initial groundwater was encountered in boring B-4 at a depth of about

twenty-one and one-half (21.5) feet (bgs). The remaining borings were dry upon

completion. After the completion of the daily drilling operations, each borehole

was backfilled with bentonite to prevent the formation of conduits for the vertical

migration of contamination. This prevented the performance of water level

observations at later intervals.

The groundwater measurements generally indicate static groundwater

elevations of about EL. 84.25 at MW-2, and EL. 84.35 at MW-3. The

measurements have been tabulated in the Appendix on Table I. Because

groundwater was not observed in monitoring well MW-1, a third groundwater

elevation data point could not be obtained.

Based upon these measured static groundwater elevations, the estimated

groundwater flow directior:l-ber:leatl:l e site is generally in a easterlY- direction. -However, groundwater elevations and flow direction can vary seasonally, with

temperature, changes in land use, or during periods of heavy precipitation. In

addition, this observation should not be considered definitive due to the limited and

lack of long term data and the relatively short distance between wells which makes

definitive evaluation difficult.

12

rr=== Professional Service Industries ========================11 Field Screening

The results of field screening with the PID indicated detectable levels in soil

samples obtained from 8-2, 8-3, and 8-4; however, the detectable levels were less

than or equal to 1 ppm (instrument units) and had no associated petroleum odor.

For the ease of interpretation, the PID results, along with the results of the

chemical analyses have been provided on the boring logs.

LABORATORY ANALYSES

Soil Analyses

The soil samples submitted for chemical analysis were selected from the

borings based upon field observations and results of field screening, with the intent

of estimating the horizontal and vertical extent of affected soils. The samples were

subjected to analytical testing, and the results, along with corresponding PID

readings, are summarized below:

All of the samples analyzed contained ORO values less than 10 ppm. The

analysis for Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) indicated detectable levels

at boring 8-1 (6.5'-8.5'), boring 8-3 (9'-11 '), and Boring 8-4 (13'-15')(23'-25').

Currently, there are no regulatory standards for PAH in soils. The highest

concentration of PAH were encountered within 8-4, where the soils encountered

consisted of miscellaneous fills. No detectable levels of ORO or PVOC were noted

within these samples and it is possible that the PAHs detected were a result of

other materials within the fills and not a result of the tank release. The levels of

PAH in the other samples were generally at lower levels.

13

r.=== Professional Service Industries ========================::::;!

In addition, rather low levels of PVOC were detected in samples B-2 (7' -9')

and B-2 (11 '-13').

Sample Location

B-1, 6.5'-8.5' B-1, 13'-15' B-2, 7'-9' B-2, 11' -13' B-3, 9'-11' B-3, 13'-15' B-4, 13'-15' B-4, 23' -25'

ANALYTE Acenapthene Acenapthylene Anthracene Benzo(a)anthracene Benzo(a)pyrene Benzo(b)flouranthene Benzo(k)flouranthene Benzo(ghi)perylene Chrysene Oibenzo(a, h)anthracene Fluoranthene Fluorene lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene Napthalene Phenanthrene Pyrene

Compound

Tert Butyl Methylether Benzene Toluene Ethyl benzene Xylene (m-,p-) a-Xylene 1,3,5,Trimethylbenzene 1,2,4,Trimethylbenzene

Summarv of Analytical Tests

PID Instrument TPH as ORO

\o\c

Units (in ppm) PAH

ND <10 see below ND <10 none detected <1 <10 none detected ND <10 none detected <1 <10 see below ND <10 none detected 1 <10 see below

ND <10 see below

Pol nuclear Aromatic H drocarbons PAH B-1, 6.5'-8.5' B-3, 9'-11' B-4, 13'-15'

ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 66 53 43 74 29 30 67 34 ND 58 44 ND ND ND ND 97 ND 17 ND NO ND

250 103 85 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

183 78 41 229 116 73 -

'241 \-'?b 1-\~+w't> ;;l'd"\ i'?\,

Petroleum Volatile Organic Compounds (ppb) B-2, 7'-9' B-2, 11'-13'

ND ND 2 ND ND NO NO NO

14

NO NO 3 4 11 NO 3 11

PVOC

none detected none detected toluene, 2ppb see below none detected none detected none detected none detected

250 130 230 160 170 ND ND ND

510 170 ND 42

600 ~"-;,. I \1-).u

410

'3'350 ppb _5 . 3s- Pf',.,...

r.==== Professional Service Industries ========================11 Groundwater Analyses

The results of the groundwater analyses indicated detectable concentrations

of Diesel Range Organics from the sample obtained from monitoring well MW-3 on

the order of 160 parts per billion (ppb). However, upon examining the analytical

data, PSI 's chief chemist indicated that data resembled an unidentified organic

compound in the C18 to C20 range unrelated to commercial petroleum products.

No PAHs were detected at or above the detection limits of the laboratory W

equipment. The VOC scan revealed trace concentrations of methylene chloride

and acetone in MW-2 of 1 ppb and 3 ppb respectively. A trace concentration of

acetone was also observed in MW-3 of 2 ppb. The levels of concentration above

were all below the required laboratory quantification level. None of the other

volatile organic compounds which were analyzed for were present at levels above

the detection limits of the laboratory equipment.

The State of Wisconsin has established Groundwater Quality Standards in

Chapter NR140 of the Administrative Code. Two (2) separate guideline

concentrations, the Preventive Action Limit and the Enforcement Standard, have

been established for each compound which has been listed. The Preventive Action

Limit is a more stringent guideline, but will usually require less response action

when exceeded. The Enforcement Standard is typically referenced by the DNR

when remedial action or additional studies are warranted.

The compound Methylene Chloride encountered in MW-2 was present at

concentrations below the respective Preventive Action Limit and Enforcement

Standard for the compound. Groundwater Quality Standards have not been

established for acetone. The results have been tabulated in the Appendix on Table

15

r.=== Professional Service Industries =======================11 II, along with the respective Groundwater Quality Standards.

EVALUATION AND CONCLUSIONS

Soil Discussion

The Department of Natural Resources currently uses a guideline DRO level

of 10 ppm, which when exceeded, will usually require remediation. Detectable

concentrations of TPH as DRO were noted in the walls of the excavation in

samples analyzed previously. Test results indicated the soils to have

corresponding values in the range of 88 ppm to 125 ppm as DRO. No detectable

TPH concentrations as DRO or PID levels above 1 instrument unit were present in

the samples obtained at borings B-1 through B-4, and, based upon the relatively

low permeability of the clayey subsoils, it is estimated that contamination does not

extend to distances greater than five (5) feet or so beyond the limits of the original

excavation. The approximate horizontal area of soils estimated to be in excess of

this guideline level is shown on the Location Plan in the Appendix.

Based upon the laboratory results, soils which are contaminated appear to

be present to depths of about ten (1 0) to twelve (12) feet bgs. Soil samples

obtained at the perimeter borings had reported concentrations below the current

DNR guideline. However, be advised that some localized areas of affected soils

at greater depths may be present.

Considering the field and laboratory data, and utilizing an approach which

assumes that affected soils extend a short distance from the previous excavation,

it is estimated that about one hundred (1 00) cubic yards of contaminated soil

16

r;::::::== Professional Service Industries ========================il

remain at this site. Considering these factors, the changes in volume which will

occur during excavation, and the proximity of underground utilities, there will be

some variation in the amount of affected soils.

Also of consideration is the potential for affected soils to encroach upon,

and extend beneath the existing concrete utility vault. Should this be the case, any

removal of affected soils, if performed, should proceed only to a reasonable

distance that will not cause an adverse effect on the existing structure or adjacent

utilities. However, the DNR evaluates each site individually and their disposition will

be based upon considerations which will not become evident until the time of

removal. An apparent advantage at this time is that the groundwater has not been

impacted to a substantial degree.

Should affected soils be present near the structure, and should they be

permitted to remain, it may be necessary to utilize an impermeable barrier,

between the affected soils left in place and the clean soil fill, to prevent the possible

migration of contaminants back into the remediated area.

Groundwater Discussion

Based upon the results of groundwater analysis, it does not appear that the

groundwater has been significantly impacted due to the prior tank release.

Considering this site and the general vicinity is serviced by all major utilities

including water, the groundwater situation does not appear to pose a substantial

risk to public health or the environment at this time. Therefore, remedial action of

groundwater within this area does not appear to be warranted at this time.

It appears, based upon the results of the first round of groundwater

sampling, that an appropriate action in this area would include additional sampling

17

rr=== Professional Service Industries ========================il

and analysis of these wells. This should include at least one (1) more round of

water sampling/analysis at the conclusion of any further soil remediation or at a

future date. Based upon those results, future sampling or additional studies may

be required.

REMEDIATION ACTION PLAN DISCUSSION

Site Remediation Considerations

In developing an appropriate remediation plan alternatives for this site,

several factors were considered, which include:

The type, concentration and extent of contaminated soils The types of subsurface soil at this site Time and economic factors The probability for contaminated soils to extend below the existing concrete utility vault Results of groundwater analysis Cost associated with remediation Past, current and future uses of the facility

Soil Remediation

Based upon the results of this assessment, it is estimated that soil

contamination due to the prior tank release does not appear to extend more than

a few feet or so beyond to previous excavation limits. The majority of

contaminated soils appear to have been removed at the time of tank closure. In

addition, the results of groundwater analysis has indicated the prior release has not

substantially impacted the area groundwater.

Wisconsin Bell has indicated that at this time there is no planned additions

or alterations at this site. Further, Wisconsin Bell has no plans on leaving or selling

18

r.==== Professional Service Industries ========================i!

this facility and will likely remain there for several years.

Considering these points, it is recommended that consideration be given to

passive type bio-remediation at this site in conjunction with periodic monitoring of

the groundwater monitoring wells. At this time, a quarterly monitoring program for

the next year would appear to be appropriate. Based upon the results of these

analyses, recommendation for further studies or remediation could be provided.

Although this alternative appears to be feasible for this site, DNR approval

would be required. If this alternative is deemed appropriate by the DNR, further

remediation of any impacted soils should be performed in the event any

excavation, additions or similar work is performed at the site which would result in

the unearthing of soils within this area.

If passive bio-remediation in conjunction with site monitoring is not deemed

appropriate by the DNR, based upon the results of the contamination assessment

and the above factors, it appears that the most cost effective approach of

remediating contaminated soils at this site would involve excavation and off-site n ·)} ~ ~ 1)'cu ~

treatment or disposal. At each test boring, the subsoils consisted o al· e~tiff to

hard silty clay soil. These soils typically exhibit very low permeability

characteristics. Therefore, in-situ remediation alternatives such as soil venting or

vapor extraction does not appear to be feasible. Bio-remediation techniques were

also considered for this site. However, based upon the low permeability

characteristics of the clayey subsoils, an enhanced bio-remediation approach

would have to be accomplished by excavating all of the impacted soils and either

stockpiled on-site or off-site and then subsequently treated with bio enhancement

materials. Based upon the rather small quantity of soils affected and lack of space

19

r.==== Professional Service Industries ========================;'! on-site for such a system to be constructed, this would most likely not be the most

economical alternative.

Soil Removal and Restoration

If the soil removal and treatment option presented herein is performed, it is

recommended that removal activities begin near the area of the existing tank

excavation and extend laterally and vertically. Any upper, unaffected soils present

can be stripped and stockpiled for later use. Soils exhibiting detectable VOC levels

with a PID, and anticipated to be in excess of 10 ppm TPH, should be properly

remediated. The exception may be along the east side of the existing utility vault,

where only those soils which can be excavated without intruding upon or beneath

adjacent utilities should be removed.

Be advised that perched groundwater may be encountered within a few feet

of the lower elevation of affected soils and, depending upon subsoil conditions,

may not permit entire removal of affected soils. Excavation beyond a short

distance into the groundwater will be difficult, will likely require drying of the soils

prior to treatment, and is not advised. Depending upon the effectiveness of the

soil removal , and the amount of affected soils, if any, that cannot be removed, it

may be necessary to install a temporary groundwater sump to control groundwater

and complete soil removal operations. All groundwater removed during excavation

must be properly disposed of.

Upon completion of the removal activities, soil samples should, at a

minimum, be obtained from each of the four (4) sidewalls at a maximum distance

of twenty-five (25) between sampling points and the bottom of the excavation and

subjected to laboratory analysis in accordance with current LUST site regulations.

20

r.==== Professional Service Industries =======================11 The excavation should then be backfilled with clean granular fill which is relatively

free of organics or other deleterious matter. The fill should be placed in lifts not

exceeding twelve (12) inches in thickness and be compacted to at least 90% of the

maximum dry density as determined by ASTM method D-1557.

21

r.=== Professional Service Industries ========================il

APPENDIX

USGS Topographic Map General Site Plan Boring Site Plan Soil Boring Logs

Monitoring Well Construction Logs- DNR Form 4400-113A, 4400-113B Table I Table II

Laboratory Analytical Data Chain-of-Custody Forms

Tank Inventory Form SBD-7 437 Tank Closure Form SBD-8951

Application for Soil Treatment Form 4400-149 Soil Manifest

DNR Letter of August 28, 1993

-~~·~ f\

USGS- 7.5 min. TOPOGRAPHIC- MILWAUKEE QUADRANGLE SCALE: 1" 2,000'

r

'

I

fl

...

... ~

0 3= o:J

-o (/)

Gate

~ 0 3= (1.)

-o (/)

Gate

I I -:----

~

0 3= (1.)

-o <75

Kilbourn Avenue

Sidewalk \ I Sidewalk cu' u c: 0 .._ ~

c:::: LI..J

~Entrance 8~5 N. 35th Sl

Entrance :

I ~ I :r .tnt~ar~ I Loading lock /. • o:J Parking . 1 . . g PreVJ.oos y Ex:i.stmg cu Lot

6,CXX}-gallco Fiberglass usr LL..

\ I I Parking Lot • • ......

0 0

Cl . Loading Entrance:

Dock

~ 801 N. 35th Sl

Sidewalk ~~~ Sidewalk

Wells Street Q.) (1.) ~ Sidewalk ....... Sidewalk 0 0 c.!) (.!)

......... 0

_J (1.) en C"l 0 Parking Lot c:

:.52 '-0

0....

\.... 0

(.!)


,. t"'-

~

0 3= (1.)

-o (/)

~ 0 3= (1.)

-o (/)

i"" ~

...!lC:

0 3= (1.)

-o (7j


801 N. 35th Street


845 N. 35th Street

C0153 Milw. Wells Parking Lot

3601/15 W. Wells Street

( -

,.._-3

PSI A-300-7 (2)

00 c .....

"d ...... ..... :I

>!1

)..<

Q) .u c Q)

u 00 c .....

......

...... ..... >!1

......

...... Q)

>!1

c ..... Cll c 0 u Cll ..... :3

00 c ..... .u Cll ..... X w

Q) · .u

Q) )..<

u c 0 u

B- 1/MW

& Ven t S-:-4 _ ..a...z:

B- 4

z

Appr oximate ·Excavation Limits( 10-5- 92)

t,

Estimated extent of contaminated soils above 100 ppn as DRO

Contrete : Utility Vault

+I

Bench Mark ~----~------------~~~- = 100.00

Entry [= 690.0 MSL (estlinated)]

~ - Soil Boring/JMonitoring Well Location A - Anal yti ca l Sampl e Location

PROJECT NAME UST Site Assessrrent - Wiscons in Bell Billing Center

SITE PLAN Scale: I" = 10'

PROJECTNO. DATE 052-24033 9--2- 92



Boring ___ B-_1 _______ _

Project Name: __:W.::i:.::.s.=.con=s=-in;:,....::Be.=.l=-l.:....:::.B.=.il=-l_i~ng~C_e:..:.nt.:..:e=-r _________ Date of Boring: __ Se_!.p_t_ernbe __ r_16-'-,_19_9_2 __

Site: _____ 84;___5_N_._3_5_t_h_S_t_r_ee_t_-_Mi_._l_wa_uk_e_e.:...., _WI ________ Project No.: ___ 0_52_-_24_0_3_3 ____ _

DESCRIPTION DEPTH SAMPLE N Ou PID rna REMARKS

SURFACE !=-{1oist, Bro;.m SAND AND GRAVEL (Fill..) r -W1Q"1st, Bro;.m SAND, Trace Clay and Asphalt - -t-(FTIL) (SP) - 1-SS 15 NO No Odor -t-Moist, Bro;.m, Clayey SAND, Trace Gravel -~(POSSIBLE Fill..) 5 • 2-SS 5 NO No Odor • t- -r- - 3-SS 4 NO <10 No Odor -t- - -t-

(SP) -~Moist, Gray, Silty CLAY, Trace. Sand and 10 • 4-SS 6 NO No Odor • t-Gravel -t- - 5-SS 17 NO No Odor -t- -t-

(CL) - 6-SS 13 NO <10 No Odor -15

_End of Boring - -- - -_Boring dry upon completion. - -- - -• • • ~PID - Photoionization Detector value in parts - -

·- per million - -1- - --DRO - Total Petroleun Hydrocarbon as Diesel - -~ Range Organics in parts per million. • • t- - -t- - -t- - -t- - -1- • • t- - -r- - -1- - -1- - -1- • • 1- - -1- - -1- - -1- - -~ • • t- - -1- - -1- - -t- - -~ • • t- - -

PSI A-100-9



Boring_--=B-_2 ________ _

Project Name: Wisconsin Bell Billing Center Date of Boring: -~Se::!p:..::t=errbe==:.::r__:..:16:...z,--'-'19:..::9-=2 __

Site: _____ 84_S_N_. _3_S_th_S_tr_e_e_t _-_Mi_._l_wa_uke __ e:...., _WI _______ Project No.: ___ os_2_-_24_0_33 ____ _

DESCRIPTION DEPTH SAMPLE N Ou PlD 000 REMARKS

SURFACE -f:\Asfhalt Paverrent r -No Recovery r-Moist, Broon, Silty ClAY, Trace Sand and - 1-SS 17 - Drove Stone -r-Gravel -r- (CL) - 2-SS 26 ND No Odor -•Moist, Gray, Silty ClAY, Trace to Little 5 • - Sand and Gravel - 3-SS 18 ND No Odor -1- -f- - 4-SS 17 <I <10 No Odor -- -• 10. 5-SS 17 ND No' Odor • - -r- (CL) - 6-SS 17 ND <10 No Odor -r-End of Boring - -~ • • i- Boring dry upon canpletion. - -~ - -r- Boring dry 2 hours after canpletion. - -i- - -~PID - Photoionization Detector value in parts • • r- per million - -f- - -

-'1 i- DRO - Total Petroleun Hydrocarbon as Diesel - -r- Range Organics in parts per million - -~ • • 1- - -1- - -i- - -r- - -I- • • i- - -f- - -f- - -f- - -

"' • •

~ - -r- - -1- - -1- - -

"' • •

1- - -1- - -1- - -r- - -

"' • •

.... - -

PSI A-1(JC).9



Boring B-3

Project Name: ____:W~i=s=con==s=in::.:.....:Be==ll=-=B=i=ll=i=n2g_:Ce:..=n=te=r~-------- Date of Boring: __ S_e~p_t_erroe __ r_16....:..,_19_9_2 __

Site: ____ ....::84:..:..::.5....::N.:..:._3=..:S:..:t:::h_:S::..:t:..:r..:.ee=t=---_:Mi;.::.:..:l;_wa=uke=..:.e!...., ..:.WI;.::;_ _______ Project No. : ___ O_S2_-_2_4_03_3 ____ _

DESCRIPTION DEPTH SAMPLE N Ou PlD :000 REMARKS

SURFACE -h Ast:halt Paverrent r ~ist, BrCM'n SAND AND GRAVEL (FILL) -r - I-SS 13 NO No CXior -~Moist, BrCM'n, Slightly Mottled, Silty CLAY, -~Trace Sand and Gravel (CL) - 2-SS 17 NO No CXior -~Moist, Gray, Silty CLAY, Little to Sene Grave 5 I

~Trace to Little Sand - 3-SS 19 - No Recovery -~ -r- - 4-SS 19 - No Recovery -r- -~ 10 • 5-SS IS <I <10 No'CXior • r- -r- - 6-SS 18 NO No CXior -r- -r- (CL) - 7-SS IS NO <10 No CXior -

IS r-End of Boring - -r- - -r- Boring dry upon canpletion. - -- - -• • • _ PID - Photo ionization Detector value in parts - -- per million - -- - -

II - DRO - Total Petroleun Hydrocarbon as Diesel - -• Range Organcis in parts per million • • r- - -r- - -r- - -~ - -~ • • r- - -r- - -r- - -~ - -1- • • r - -r- - -r - -r- - -~ • • r- - -~ - -r- - -r - -~ • • r- - -

PSI A-100.9



Boring __ B_-4 _ _ _ ___ __ _

Project Name : _...:.W:..:::i:..:::sc.::..o:..::n=s-=i n::..::.._::Be=-=.=1-=-l --=B:..:i:.::l.:.:..ll::..:' n-"'g'---=-Ce=n::..:t:..:e:.::r _ ________ Date of Boring: __ S_e_;p_t_embe _ _ r_l7_,'---1_99_2 __

S ite : _____ 84_ S_N_. _3_S_th_ S_t_re_e_t_-_Mi_._l_wa_uke __ e.:..., _WI _ _ ____ _ _ Project No .: ___ 0_5_2-_2_4_0_3_3 ____ _

DESCRIPTION DEPTH SAMPLE N O u PID :000 REMA RKS

SURFACE -~As]±lalt Pavement I -~Moist, Black SAND (FilL) r - I-SS 22 NO No CX:lor -fiMoist, BrCNln SAND AND GRAVEL (FilL) r -f-Moist , Gray and Black, Organic, Silty ClAY - 2- SS 7 NO No CX:lor -~ (FTIL) 5 • r- - 3-SS 5 NO No CX:lor -~Crushed Limest one (FilL) \._ -

~ist1 BrCNln, Silty ClAY, Little Sand an~ - 4-SS 22 NO No CX:lor -

f- ave -~Moist, Green, Organic, Silty CLAY, Trace 10 • 5-SS · 2 NO No CX:lor • f.-Topsoil (FilL) -f- - 6-SS 5 < I No CX:lor -f- -r- - 7-SS 4 I < 10 No CX:lor -~ IS •

Moi st, Broon Silty CLAY (FilL) - 8- SS 7 < I No CX:lor --

t- Moi s t , Broon SAND, Trace Silt & Cl ay (Fill..) - 9-SS 6 I No CX:lor -- Moi st to Wet, BrCNln Gravel (FilL) -

• 20 • IG-SS 14 < I Poor Recovery • - Moist to Wet, Br own , Silty SAND, Sane Gravel -- (FTI.L) - 11-SS 3 - Poor Recovery -- -- - 12- SS 7 NO < 10 No CX:lor -

25 r- End of &lring - -r- - -r- Groundwater observed at 2 I . 5 1 beloo ground - -r- surface in auger upon completion. - -~ • I

r- PID - Photoionization Detector value in parts - -r- per million - -r- - -r- DRO - Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon as Diesel - -~ Range Organics in parts per million • • f- - -r- - -f- - -f- - -

~ • • f- - -

r- - -r- - -r- - -

~ • I

f- - -

PSI A-1()()-9

~)!

111

SLAte of Wi~n~in Dcputrnc:nt of Natural R=rcc~

Route to: Env. Rc.s

I Z. 6 Grid Orit:in Location

Oh:r 0 MONITORING WEU.CONSTRUcnON Fnrm 44(X).JJ3A Rev. 4-90

...111. .!13!:~ 30 11 Long. 8? 0 _5_1_

1 ~or

~---riTT"~~~~~~------~~~----~ ~~Tif~~~~~------~~~~-----ell WRtct Tallie O!=rvation Well S.Jl St. l'l1tt1C ft. N.

,.....----.,-...-:--.-Pric-7t_m_1c,.t ... cr __ -=-----..,.---,--..:;:O:;_l2~scction Loc aJ ion of W a.~ tc/Sourcc

~1/4 of tiJJI/4 of Sec. ~.T.l N, R.~~ W.

A. Protective pipe. top elevation *- b .9 0. 9::, ft. MSL

B. Well casing, lop elevation .¥ _ fl ..9 J). 3 3 ft. MSL

C. Land surface elevation *" _ ,h 9 g .9 ft. MSL

D. Surface seal. bonom ____ ·- fL MSL or 9 9. 3 ft.~-~:~;~.~;,.:.:

12. ~!C~cl~~~~~tio~~.t~oil r;;:: ~e~~ O SP O ·'~:.~}~; ·: SM 0 SC 0 ML 0 MH 0 CL .3 CH 0 lkdrcx::k 0

13. Sieve analysis anachcd? 0 Yc:s

14. Drilling method used: Rot.ary 0 50 Hollow Stem Auger 3-4 I

Ohcr 0 :..~

15. Drilling Ouid used: Wa1cr 0 0 2

Drilling Mud 0 0 3

16. Drilling additives u$cd? 0 Yc:s

AirOOI

~.L&-99

Describe---------------17. Source of watcr (attach analysis):

E. Bentonite seal, top _· ___ ·- ft. MSL or _ :l g . 2

F. Fine sand, top

G. Filter pad:. top

H. Screen joinL top

I. Well bottom

____ . _ ft. MS Lor _ ~ _5 • ~

---- ·- ft.MSLor _33 .2

____ ·- ft. MSL or_:! l . Q

____ . _ ft. MSL or_ f3 i . Q

1. Filter p~d:, bot:om ---- ·- ft. MSL or- I 9.. . .s K. Borehole, lxlnom

L. 13oreholc. di:unc!cr !2.2 m. 'if. i3"-stcl.

M. 0.0. wcll C>t.\in!: - ?:- ."??!: 1ei.Mport>Jy

in.

el loo.o-:.. N. J.D. well ca.,in1: - ~ .Q S" 10.

ft.

Btoi'\J-. v-._(;..r~

~110.0 r-tSL. l~>fl,_

_.,-I. Cap and lock?

~ 2. Prot.cctivc cover pipe:

a. Inside diunctcr: J !! . ~ in.

b. Length: _J .Q ft.

c. M&Jaial: ) Stccl 0 0 4

,AI~&Mtl\k.M {Flu.sb Mo~whJ 0:1~ S. __ d. Adiitional prot.cCtion? 0 Yes s( N:l

lfycs.<k=ibc: -----------

3. Surface seal: Bentonir.e 0 3 0 Conc:rer.e ~ 0 I

_________________________ orncr o 4. Mataial bccwecn well ca.~ing and protective pipe:

Bentonir.e l'i( 3 0 Annular sp= seal 0

Ohcr 0 5. Annular space seal: a. Granular Bentonite 12!. 3 3

b. ____ Lb·s/gal mud weight ... BL-ntonite-sand slurry 0 3 5 c. ____ Lbs/gal mud weight . . . . . Bentonite slurry 0 3 I

d % Bentonite . . . . . . Bcntonite-ament ,.,.out 0 50 ·-- 3 CT'

c. I' 5 Ft )olurnc added for any of the above

r. Hom~~~?· Trc:rnie o o 1

6. Bentonite seal:

b. 01/4 in. 0311! in.

Trcmie pumped 0 0 2

Gravity £5! 0 8

a. Bentonite granule.~ g 3 3

0 1(2 in. Bentonite: pellets 0 3 2

c.------------------------ orncr o 7. Fine sand mar.erial: Manu( acturcr, product name & mesh si1.c

a. BoA~u Mi"'-~"'-~, £;!'\.€. 'S:f:ces'SvJ .2.fp.4""~-b. Volume added ft3

8. Filr.er pack material: Manufacturer, product name and mesh si1.e

a. W,v t-"\i"'i"")l RaeSilic"'s..A 1 .2.-ft>A""" .... b. Volume adrled 1'.5 ft':J("l-50 lb<i)

9. Well ca.~ing: Flush lhrca.ded PVC schedule 40 gJ 2 3

a. Screen type:

FltL'h threaded PVC schedule 80 0 2 4

Oth:r 0 f. r. 5c.hrdtJe 4o PvL-

Factory cut ~ I I

Cominuous slot 0 0 1

----------------------------O~c:r 0 b. Manufacturer -"D~1 t ... df.>.!..r_,_,·>:::{;.:.:l...=---------c. Slot size:

d Sloncd length:

I I. Hacklill matt.-rial (hclow filt.:r p~ck):

0. Q .Q~ in.

lQ .Q. ft.

None .8( I 4

OJ·~ 0

on this form is :ruo and corrHct to t110 b11st of my knowl<:l"!qo.

r .,

t••

II

State of Wisconsin MONITORING WELL DEVELOPMENT Department of N a.tural Resources Fonn 4400-113B Rev. 4-90

Route to: Solid Waste 0 Haz. Waste 0 Wastewa!a 0 Env. Response & Repair 0 Underground TanlcsO Olher 0 ---







surged with block, bailed and pumped

compressed air bailed only

pumped only

pumped slowly

Other


0 Yes lYJ N>

D 41

D 61

D 42

D 62 D 70

D 20 !lSI 1 0

D 5 1

D 50 D :ill

--~_Qmin.

4. Depth of well (from top of well casisng) _ j_ ~ . .2 ft.


6. Vohnne of water in filter pack and well casing





16. Additional comments on developmenc

__ 2,. t.. gal.

--.i . .Q. gal.

- -=- ...£ . .::.. gal.

DYes D N>

11. Depth to Water

(from top of a. _ l_ h .llz_ ft. - .l Jz. . .!2.. ~ ft. well casing)

Date

Time

Sediment in well bottom

3. Water clarity

b~Q_/ l.k.J :L 2. mm dd yy

3a.m. c. _ _i: ±'2-o

_::.!:...._:_inches

Oear S-1 0 Thrbid t:: 1 5 (Descnbe)

j_ .Q_ I _L_ .h. I ~ _3:: m m d d y y

IZi a.m. _L .Q_: 4 2..o p.m.

-=.E._ • -=- inches

Oear p;r 20 Turbid !il 2 5

Fill in if drilling fluids were used and well_is at solid waste facility:


solids

15. COD ____ ._mg/1 ____ ._mg/1

NOTE: Shaded trreas are for DNR use only. See instrUctions for more information including a list of county codes.

I l

r .

"

I

St.atc of Wi!-Cen~in DcpB11mcrl! of Natural R=,un·.c~

Route to·

Env. Res

A. Protc.ctive pipe. top elevation ·* _ .k:! Q. _i;?].. ft. MSL

B. Well ca.~ing. top elevation ~ _ ~ ~ Q .1-~ ft. MSL ----++-·~

C. Land surface elevation ~ _ b_ i Q .2 ft. MSL

13. Sieve analysi.~ an.ached? 0 Yes

I4. Drilling method uS«l; Rot.ary 0 50

Hollow Stem Auger ~ I Ohc:r 0 . ·.

I5. Drilling lluid used: W21Cr 0 0 2 Drilling Mud 0 0 3

16. Drilling additives u!'cd? 0 Yes

Nr 0 01

Nones:. 9 9

Dcscribc _________________________ _

17. Source of water (auach analysis):

E. Bentonite seal. top

F. Fine sand. top

G. Filter pad:, top ____ . _ ft. MS Lor _ 3_ 2_ • ~

H. Screen joint. top ____ ·- ft. MSL or_ 9_ b .Q

I. Wdl bottom ----·- ft.MSLor_81.Q ft.

1. Filter p~td:. bonum ____ ·- ft. MSL or_ f3 Q .Q

K. Borehole. honom ____ ·-ft. MSLor _ 8 Q. .Q

L. Borehole. diameter 1 Q .~ in.

M. 0.0. welll"it.\in~-: _?,. 3 "} ln.

ln.

()he- 0 MONn-<)RJNG WELLCONSTRUcnON Fnm1 4400-113A Rev. 4-90

umber

Not Known

~I. Cap and lock? Yes 0 1'-0 ~ 2. Prot:octivc cover pipe:

a. Inside diameter.

b. Length:

lQ.. ~in. _l. Q ft.

c. M11crial: l 2 A \!AIM j hLLM. F="~l MOIM:t I

Steel 0 04 Olu ~ __

d. Ad1itional prot:oction? 0 Yes s;t l'b

If yes. d=ribc: ------------

3. surf a.:.c sc.al: Bentonite !5!- 3 0

Concrete 0 0 I

------------Ohc:r 0 4. Mauna! between well ca..~ing and protc.ctivc pipe:

Bt.-ntonite ~ 3 0

Annular space seal 0 Qhcr 0

5. Annu!z:- space seal: a. Granular Bentonite J& b. ___ Lbs/gal mud weight ... Bentonite-sand slurry 0 c. __ Lbs/gal mud weight . . . . . Bentonite slurry 0 d '?C Bentonite . . . . . . rl<.:ntonitc-ament grout 0 ·-- 3

c. 2.0 (t vol~e added for any of the above 2oolbJ T · 0 f. Ho"'· irma! ed: rcTIJe

6. Bentonite seal:

b. Ol/4in. 03/l!in.

Trcmie pumped 0 GrAvity ~

a. rlcntonite granule.~ fia

0 1(1 in. Bentonite pellets 0

~---------------------------Ohc:r 0

3 3

35

3 I 50

0 I

02 Oll 33 32

7. Fine sa.'ld material: Manufacturer. product name & mesh si1.c

a. 'Bo.Aqu Miy\j..._., E:"'e..S:Iic.a..Su...d .2.-h.:4..,. ...... __ I) 3

b. Voh.:mc added ft

L~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

b.

10. Screen mau:rial:

L Screen type:

Rush threaded PVC sch<Xlule 40 R<L<h threaded PVC schedule W

Ohc:r f.\. ~cku!Ji 4n P\10

Factory cut

Continuous slot

o~'ler

0

9 0 0

23 24

I I

0 I

b. M anuf actwcr _..uDcti l'uJ.!..!,-..!~~c.:!.k.~------0. QQ ~in.

l.O. ~ ft. c. Slot si1e: d. Sloucd lcn~:t.h:

I I. f3ack!ill m.alJ..-rial (hdow fj)l,:r pack): N:n: !:!} I 4

OJ>e:r 0

on this form is truo and corr~!C! to tt10 ::>est of rny knowlt:rJrJH.

'I ·c cornplc«: i•11h ~ 1 des ol tlus lonn Ht><.l return to til<.~ appropr~~•c J, ·R ollit.c j,,,,.d at tl•e '"I' o! tlus l••rm .._, ropnr,·d by dt'. J.l4. 14 "'".1 It• I. IS.· WIS .•

nnd ch. NK I·! I. \I.' is. ;,d. Ct>tlc. In accordance with ch.l4·1. \Vi~ Stat.s .. faiilrr•: to file this fonn n11ry result in a fod•:i:urc of not lc's than S I 0. nor more tha11 S5CXXl for •·: • .:h ,:,v of viobtion. In OICCor<lit!KC with ch. 1-17. v:;,. Stats .. failur<: to file thi., form OIHY rc,ult in • forf•:.<ure of'"'' more tla:tn SIO.Ci'•O for c..ch

,. I

State of Wisconsin MONITORING WELL DEVELOPMENT Department of Natural Resources Form 4400-113B Rev. 4-90

Route to: Solid WasteD Haz. WasteD Wastewater 0

Env. Response & Repair 0 Underground TanlcsO Other 0







surged with block, bailed and pumped compressed air bailed only

pumped only

pumped slowly

Otm








10. Anal~is performed on water added? (If yes, auach results)


0 Yes

D 41

D 6 1

0 42

0 62 CJ 70

CJ 20 CJ 1 0

CJ 5 1

D 50 .... ..

CJ :::-:-:-.-.-: :..:.:.: :~

____ min.

ft

-- , __ in.

--- · _gal.

___ . _gal.

___ ._gal.

DYes ON>


T'Illle


3. Water clarity

a. ___ . __ ft.

'[)e.-~

b . ..l .Q. I J.. J?.. I .i. 7.-mm dd yy

oa.m. c. __ : __ CJ

__ . _inches

Clear D 10 Turbid CJ 15

(Desctibe)

ft.

be-~ _l Q I .J.. ..k I .1. 2-mm dd yy

oa.m. __ : __ I:Jp.m.

___ inches

Clear 0 20 Turbid D 25 (Describe)

in if drilling fluids were used and well is at solid waste facility:

14. Total suspended ____ . _ mg/1 ____ . _ mg/l

solids

15. COD ____ . _ mg/1 ____ . _ mg/l

Print Initials: _M_ E._ .£2.

NOTE: Shaded areas are for DNR use only. See ins tructions for more information inc:uding a list of counry codes.

fl

MONITORING WEll. CONSTR UCilON Form 4400-II3A Rc,·. 4-90

urnbcr

'T'\'-::-"-""Trr-;;-,-,.--'TTT-....,.,..--..,...--,.---=~--i Section Loc a1 ion of W a..~IC/S<Juro: _1/4 of_l/4 ofScc._.T._N, R. _8 W.

0 N> d 0 Do"''Tlcradimt

A. t'rotccti,·e pipe. top elevation* _ b ,9 0 . 4 3 ft. MS L

B. Well ca..~ in g. top elevation * _ ~ 1 Q . Q B ft. MSL

C. Lmd surf2ce elevation * _ b :1 Q .4 ft. MSL

D. Surface seal bonom fL MSL or q ~ ~ ft. ~~~;~:

IL ~rgd~~r~r~o~ ~ g'"~ ~ ~~ g '•1~? Bo::lro::k 0

13. Sieve analysis anachcd? 0 Yes

14. Drilling method used: Rot.ary 0 50

Hollow Stem Auger ~ 4 I Ohcr 0 :.:...:..

IS. Drilling fluid used: W= 0 0 2 Drilling Mud 0 0 3

AirOOI None I( 9 9

16. Drilling additives used? o Yes ~cribe _________________ ___

17. Source of water (attach analysis):

E. Bentonite seal, top ft. MSL or q q 4 ----·- ---· F. Fine sand, top

G. Filter pad::, top ft. MSL or

H. Screen joint. top ____ ·- ft. MSL or_~ l .1

I. Well bottom ____ . _ ft. MSL or _ _e l .4: ft.

J. Filter p>~ck. bottom ____ ·- ft.."-1SLor _1.9 .9.

K. Borehole, bottom ____ . _ ft. MSL or _ '3: 9 . 9

L. Borehole. di:!ffietcr L Q .?:- 1n.

M. 0.0. well ca,ing _ f:, 3 "1 10.

N. !.D. well ca.,ing _ ~. Q 5 '"·

n

I. C2p md lock?

~ 2. Protective cover pipe: g YCI 0 N

a.. Inside di amct.cr. 1 0 . Q in.

b. Length: _ l . Q ft.

c. Mucrial: ) Stcd 0 0 4

A\ !l M i k\!J..wl, C P: f.._~b M.o~W 01u S __ d. A&litional protection? 0 Y t:S fir l'b

If yes. dc<cribc: __________ _.:..

3. surf ace: sc.a.l: Bcntonitc 0 3 0 Concrcr.c: Jii{ 0 I

------------Oh:r 0 4. Ma~aial between well ca.~ing and pro~ative pipe:

6. Bentonite ~al:

b. 0 I/4 in. 03/l! in.

Bentonitc 3' 3 0

Annular space seal 0 Ohcr 0

3 3 35

3 I 50

0 OI

0 02 Gravity c:!( 0 8

a. Bentonite gra:1Uic..~ Ja 3 3

0 1/2 in. Bentonite pellets 0 3 2

'·-------------- Olhcr 0 7. Fine sand material: M1111ufacturcr. product name & mesh si1.c

a. Bad~u- N:";,.~, (:":~e. Sili<.~ Sa_w:{, .Z-h.4 ~~ b. Volume added ft 3

l!. Filter pack material: Manufacturer, product name and mesh si7.c

a.Badqc.rM;II\;1\qJ f;.,_e. S;(~(4 ~ ,.2-fD.4""-~_: h. VollL'Tle adrlcd ] • 0 ft {?Qo lbs.)

9. Well ca.,ing: FllL~h threaded PVC schedule 40 OJ 2 3

Fltt'h thread<:d PVC schedule 80 0 24

O.hcr 0

10. Scrcx:n material: ET '5,~2 4n 'PVC...

a.. Scrcxn type: Factory cut ~ I I

Continuous slot 0 0 I

Other 0

h. ~ la:tufacturcr _,_D.~.:iu.e~, d""-'-r..::_..c"-'h-"'-----c. Slot 5iJc: 0. g_o~in.

1 R. Q ft. d Stoned lcnr,tlt:

II. Had:fill matL:rial (1x:low filter pack): None f9. I 4

0JICf 0

on this form is truo and corr(~c: to !It<; best of mv knowlr:d o.

'I· ~c"cmnp <'lc l>oth ~Ides of us tor 111 ><rod return to th<: •J'l"''l'""'C J, I{ nll•<:c l"u·d "' :)•c '"I' ot till~ ln:rna\ rcqtnn:d hy chs. 14~. 14 >111<1 I toO, 15. tat~ .• •nd ch. NK. l·ll. Wi~. Ad. Code. In accord:me<: with ch.lt.-l. \l,'j, St:tL~ .• f;,ilurc ''' f,J.: thi, fonn rn•y rc,ult in • fmfciturc of not l"s tltan SIU. l>ll more than SSO<Xl for r:.ch day of viol:ltion. In ;occ 01 rt1:mc:e with dt. 1-~7. \~·;,_Stat~ .• failure''' fik tlw. f.,rmrnay rc~ult in~ fnrf•:irurc of not rnorc thnn S I<J.')(Xl for c..ch

r·

I

~ .-"""

li

MONITORING WELL DEVELOP.MENT Fonn 4400-113B Rev. 4-90

Sate of Wisconsin l)qJartment of N atura1 Resources

Route to: Solid Waste 0 Haz. Waste 0 W astr.W8lt:t 0 Env. Response&. Repair 0 Underground TanlcsO ~ 0 ---







surged with block, bailed and pumped compressed air bailed only

pumped only

pumped slowly

Otm-




6. Volume ofwa~r in filtr.rpack and well casing

7. Volume ofwaterremoved from well



10. Analysis ~ormed on water added? (If yes, anach results)


ell developed by:

Name: r

Firm:

0 Yes 0 N:l

0 41

0 61

0 42

0 62

0 70

0 20

a. 10

0 51

0 50 ··:·:-:·:-:.:·

0 :~{~~=~:~~~

__ .4:_ .2 min.

- j_ .a_ .1. ft.

_k .Q...~in.

--~._lgal.

- j_ .Q. . .Q gal.

-~..£...:::...gal.

0 Yes 0 N:l

11. Depth to Watr.r (from top of well casing)

Date

Tune


3. Water clarity

Before

a. _ _L5.l.2.Ct.

b._l_Q...!..!...~J !L1:. mm dd yy

D. [fra.m. c._:L:45o

..:: ~ • ::.._ inches

Clear ~ 1 0 Turbid 0 15

(Descn"be)

After

- j_ 2. . 1- .2. ft.

{OJ/loJ12-mm "d"d -y-y ta-a.m.

_l Q_ : ~ .Q. 0 p.m.

..::. ~ . =-inches

Oear 0 20 Turbid~ 25



solids

15.COD ____ ._mg/1 ____ ._mg/1

Signature:

Print Initials:

Firm:

NOTE: Shaded I!Icas are for DNR use only. See instructions for more information including a list of county codes.

r;::::== Professional Service Industries =====================::;,

TABLE I

STATIC GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONS

Elevation Elevation Groundwater Station Ground Surface Top of Casing Elevation (I 0 /16)

BM 100.00 (assumed) MW-1 100.52 100.26 dry MW-2 100.93 100.33 84.25 MW-3 100.43 100.08 84.35

fl

r;::::=== Professional Service Industries =========================~

TABLE II

GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Enforcement Preventive Well No. Parameter Concentration Standard Action Limit

MW-2 Methylene Chloride 31 150 15 MW-2 Acetone 3

MW-3 Acetone 32

r;;:a:;;;J '~

Professional Service Industries, Inc. Lawrence Analvtical Division

ANALYTICAL REPORT

PSI - Milwaukee Project: Wisconsin Bell Billing Center


Lt'v~w~ Lawrence Organic Chemistry

Department Manager

/o- o~--92-oate

59423020-22123 October 5, 1992

4820 W. 15th Street • Lawrence, KS 66049 • Phone: 913/749-2381 • Fax: 913/865-9587




635230 B-1 TPH - Extractable

6.5-8.5 Diesel Range

Organics < 10

Acenaphthene < 1.67

Acenaphthylene <3.33

Anthracene <0.17

Benzo (a) anthracene 66

Benzo (a) pyrene 74

Benzo (b) fluoranthene 67

Benzo (k) fluoranthene 58

Benzo (ghi) perylene <0.33

Chrysene 97

Dibenzo (a,h) anthracene

<0.33

Ruoranthene 250

Fluorene <0.33

lndeno (1 ,2,3-cd) pyrene

<0.17

Naphthalene <1 .67

Phenanthrene 183

Pyrene 229

DETECTION UMIT

10

1.67

3.33

0.17

0.17

0.17

0.33

0.17

0.33

0.17

0.33

0.33

0.33

0.17

1.67

0.17

0.17

UNITS

mgjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

59423020-22123 October 5, 1992

-rrv METHOD

3550/8015

WI SW-141

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

I

L

r-

PSI / Hall-Kimbrell Sample ID VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

~lient: PSI-MILWAUKEE Project No.: 59423020

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL

Lab File ID: C7464

COMPOUND

TERT BUTYL METHYL ETHER Benzene Toluene Ethyl benzene Xylene (m-,p-) o-Xylene 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene

RQL = REQUIRED QUANTITATION LIMIT U = NOT DETECTED J = DETECTED BELOW RQL

RQL

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

B-1 6.5-8.5'

Lab Sample ID: 635230~~ Date Analyzed: 09/22/92

ug/Kg Detected

u u u u u u u u

E = COMPOUND CONCENTRATION EXCEEDS CALIBRATION CURVE B = COMPOUND DETECTED IN METHOD BLANK

,-.


PSI - Milwaukee 59423020-22123 Project: Wisconsin Bell Billing Center October 5, 1992 -

f -

DETECTION LAB# CUENT# ANALYTE RESULT UMIT UNITS METHOD

635231 B-1 TPH- Extractable 3550/8015

13-15 Diesel Range

Organics <10 10 mgjkg WI SW-141

Acenaphthene <1 .67 1.67 ugjkg 8310

, Acenaphthyfene <3.33 3.33 ugjkg 8310

Anthracene <0.17 0.17 ugjkg 8310

Benzo (a) anthracene <0.17 0.17 ugjkg 8310

Benzo (a) pyrene <0.17 0.17 ugjkg 8310

Benzo (b) fluoranthene <0.33 0.33 ugjkg 8310

Benzo tk) fluoranthene < 0.17 0.17 ugjkg 8310

Benzo (ghi) perylene <0.33 0.33 ugjkg 8310

Chrysene <0.17 0.17 ugjkg 8310 ,- Dibenzo (a,h) anthracene

<0.33 0.33 ugjkg 8310

Fluoranthene <0.33 0.33 ugjkg 8310

Fluorene <0.33 0.33 ugjkg 8310

lndeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene

<0.17 0.17 ugjkg 8310

Naphthalene <1.67 1.67 ugjkg 8310

Phenanthrene <0.17 0.17 ugjkg 8310

Pyrene <0.17 0.17 ugjkg 8310


Client: PSI-MILWAUKEE Project No.: 59423020


Lab File ID: C7465

COMPOUND



RQL

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

B-1 13-15'

Lab Sample ID: 635231--j>V

Date Analyzed: 09/22/92

ug/Kg Detected

u u u u u u u u





635232 B-2 TPH - Extractable

7-9 Diesel Range

Organics <10

Acenaphthene <1 .67

Ace naphthyl ene <3.33 l ~ Anthracene <0.17 "' ; ·

Benzo (a) anthracene <0.17 r·

Benzo (a) pyrene <0.17

Benzo (b) fluoranthene < 0.33

Benzo (k) fluoranthene < 0.17

Benzo (ghi) peryfene <0.33

Chrysene <0.17


<0.33

Fluoranthene <0.33 ,) ..... : Fluorene <0.33


<0.17

Naphthalene <1.67

Phenanthrene <0.17

Pyrene <0.17

DETECTION UMIT

10

1.67

3.33

0.17

0.17

0.17

0.33

0.17

0.33

0.17

0.33

0.33

0.33

0.17

1.67

0.17

0.17

UNITS

mgjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

59423020-22123 Octobey. 1992

~

METHOD

3550/8015

WI SW-141

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

PSI I Hall-Kimbrell Sample ID VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

~lient : PSI-MILWAUKEE Project No.: 59423020


Lab File ID: C7466

COMPOUND RQL



2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

B-2 7-9'

Lab Sample ID: 635232 -rsl Date Analyzed: 09/22/92

ug/Kg Detected

u u

2 u u u u u --



PSI - Milwaukee 59423020-22123 Project: Wisconsin Bell Billing Center ~!75,1992

DETECTION LAB# CLIENT# ANALYTE RESULT LIMIT UNITS METHOD

635233 B-2 TPH - Extractable 3550/8015

11-13 Diesel Range


Acenaphthene <1.67 1.67 ugjkg 8310

Acenaphthyl ene <3.33 3.33 ugjkg 8310

Anthracene <0.17 0.17 ugjkg 8310

Benzo (a) anthracene <0.17 0.17 ugjkg 8310 (.



Benzo (k) fluoranthene < 0.17 0.17 ugjkg 8310

Benzo (ghi) peryfene <0.33 0.33 ugjkg 8310

Chrysene <0.17 0.17 ugjkg 8310


<0.33 0.33 ugjkg 8310

Ruoranthene <0.33 0.33 ugjkg 8310

' I ·:1 Ruorene <0.33 0.33 ugjkg 8310


<0.17 0.17 ugjkg 8310



Pyrene <0.17 0.17 ugjkg 8310

... '




Lab File ID: C7467

COMPOUND RQL

TERT BUTYL METHYL ETHER Benzene Toluene Ethyl benzene Xylene (m-,p-) a-Xylene 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene


2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

B-2 11-13'

Lab Sample ID: 635233~J Date Analyzed: 09/22/92

ug/Kg Detected

u u

3 4

11 u

3 11

--



PSI - Milwaukee I , Project: Wisconsin Bell Billing Center

LAB# CLIENT# ANALYTE RESULT

635234 8-3 TPH- Extractable

9-11 Diesel Range

Organics <10

Acenaphthene <1.67

Acenaphthylene <3.33

Anthracene <0.17


Benzo (a) pyrene 29

Benzo (b) ftuoranthene 3.4

Benzo (k) ftuoranthene 4.4


Chrysene <0.17


<0.33

Fluoranthene 103

(i1 Ruorene <0.33


<0.17

Naphthalene <1 .67

Phenanthrene 78

Pyrene 116

DETECTION LIMIT

10

1.67

3.33

0.17

0.17

0.17

0.33

0.17

0.33

0.17

0.33

0.33

0.33

0.17

1.67

0.17

0.17

UNITS

mgjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

59423020-22123 OctobEJ 5, 1992

1\V

METHOD

3550/8015

WI SW-141

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

1

PSI/ Hall-Kimbrell Sample ID VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET



Lab File ID: C7468

COMPOUND

TERT BUTYL METHYL ETHER Benzene Toluene ·-

Ethyl benzene Xylene (m-,p-) a-Xylene 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene


RQL

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

B-3 9-11'

Lab Sample ID: 635234~~


ug/Kg Detected

u u u u u u u u


f Professional Service Industries 4820 West 15th Street, Lawrence, Kansas 66049

PSI- Milwaukee 59423020-22123 Project: Wisconsin Bell Billing Center October , 1992

(Ill --rJ1 r- DETECTION

L LAB# CUENT# ANALYTE RESULT UMIT UNITS METHOD

635235 B-3 TPH- Extractable 3550/8015

13-15 Diesel Range


Acenaphthene <1.67 1.67 ugjkg 8310

Acenaphthylene <3.33 3.33 ugjkg 8310 ,... Anthracene <0.17 0.17 ugjkg 8310

Benzo (a) anthracene <0.17 0.17 ugjkg 8310



Benzo (k) fluoranthene <0.17 0.17 ugjkg 8310

Benzo (ghi) perylene <0.33 0.33 ugjkg 8310

Chrysene <0.17 0.17 ugjkg 8310


<0.33 0.33 ugjkg 8310

Fluoranthene <0.33 0.33 ugjkg 8310 .. Fluorene <0.33 0.33 ugjkg 8310

~r· lndeno (1 ,2,3-cd) pyrene

<0.17 0.17 ugjkg 8310



Pyrene <0.17 0.17 ugjkg 8310

II

II

i .,

Ill


:lient: PSI-MILWAUKEE ~reject No.: 59423020


Lab File ID: C7469

COMPOUND



RQL

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

B-3 13-15'


ug/Kg Detected

u u u u u u u u


c

,.

tg

;_

PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES 4820 West 15th Street Lawrence, Kansas 66049

Surrogate Recovery

Client: PSI-MILWAUKEE

GCMS Organic Analysis -- Method: 8260M ~

--0 Analysis type:

Client Sample: V8LK855 PSI Sample: V8LK855 Matrix: Soil Dilution:

Surrogate Compound %Recovery Range ============================== ========= ========

1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 96 70-121 Toluene-d8 111 81-117

8romofluorobenzene 110 74-121

Client Sample: 8-1 6.5-8.5' '

PSI Sample: 635230 Matrix: Soil Dilution:




Client Sample: 8-1 13-15' PSI Sample: 635231 Matrix: Soil Oil uti on:


1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 105 70-121 Toluene-dB 106 81-117


Client Sample: 8-2 7-9' PSI Sample: 635232 Matrix: Soi 1 Dilution:




* Surrogate recovery out of range

1

2

2

2

.• ! -·

II

PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES Client: PSI-MILWAUKEE

Surrogate Recovery J Page 2 ~

Client Sample: B-2 11-13' PSI Sample: 635233 Matrix: Soil Dilution: 2

Surrogate Compound %Recovery . Range ============================== =========

1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 120 Toluene-d8 98

Bromofluorobenzene 87

======== 70-121 81-117 74-121


Surrogate Compound %Recovery ============================== =========



Range ======== 70-121 81-117 74-121


Surrogate Compound %Recovery Range ============================== =========




======== 70-121 81-117 74-121

-:

{' I .

r;;;-;;;;J '~

Professional Service Industries, Inc. Lawrence Analvtical Division

ANAt YTICAL REPORT



L/ (h.,'wow--a-,2 Lawrence Organic Chemistry

Department Manager

( j!J- tJs--7.;{

Date

59423020-22141 October 5, 1992




'i


r· 635312 B-4 13-15 TPH - Extractable

Diesel Range

Organics <10

Acenaphthene <1 .67

r- Acenaphthylene <3.33 I

Anthracene <0.17

. Benzo (a) anthracene 43

Benzo (a) pyrene 30

Benzo (b) fluoranthene <0.33

Benzo (k) fluoranthene < 0.17


Chrysene 17


<0.33

Ruoranthene 85

~ r~ Ruorene <0.33


<0.17

Naphthalene <1.67

Phenanthrene 41

Pyrene 73

DETECTION UMIT

10

1.67

3.33

0.17

0.17

0.17

0.33

0.17

0.33

0.17

0.33

0.33

0.33

0.17

1.67

0.17

0.17

UNITS

mgjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

59423020-22141 October 5, 1992

---nv METHOD

3550/8015

WI SW-141

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310


r· Client: PSI-MILWAUKEE B-4 13-15' Project No.: 59423020

~- Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Lab Sample ID: 63531~~


ug/Kg '

I

I

I

I

r·

Lab File ID: C7470

COMPOUND



RQL Detected

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2


u u u u u u u u




635313 B-4 23-25 TPH - Extractable

Diesel Range

Organics <10

Acenaphthene 640

,.-- Acenaphthylene <3.33

Anthracene 250


Benzo (a) pyrene 230

Benzo (b) fluoranthene160

Benzo (k) fluoranthene170


Chrysene <0.17

(. Dibenzo (a,h) anthracene

<0.33

Fluoranthene 510

Fluorene 170


<0.17

Naphthalene 42

Phenanthrene 680

Pyrene 410

DETECTION UMIT

10

1.67

3.33

0.1 7

0.17

0.17

0.33

0.17

0.33

0.17

0.33

0.33

0.33

0.17

1.67

0.17

0.17

UNITS

mgjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

ugjkg

5942302r-2 141 October 5 1992

!5

METHOD

3550/8015

WI SW-141

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

8310

~

;

I !!

I

r I

r


Client: PSI-MILWAUKEE B-4 23-25' Project No.: 59423020


Lab File ID: C7471

COMPOUND



Lab Sample ID:

Date Analyzed:

ug/Kg RQL Detected

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2


635313~~ 09/22/92

u u u u u u u u --

I

,-




Lab File ID: C7463

COMPOUND RQL



1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

VBLK855

Lab Sample ID: VBLK855 -f.J Date Analyzed: 09/22/92

ug/Kg Detected

u u u u u u u u


c :-]

PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES 4820 West 15th Street Lawrence, Kansas 66049

Surrogate Recovery

Analysis type: GCMS Organic Analysis -- Method: 8260M 1)~ Client: PSI-MILWAUKEE

Client Sample: V8LK855 PSI Sample: V8LK855 Matrix: Soil Dilution:

Surrogate Compound %Recovery Range ============================== ========'= ========



Client Sample: 8-4 13-15' '

1

PSI Sample: 635312 Matrix: Soi 1 Dilution: 2




Client Sample: 8-4 23-25' PSI Sample: 635313 Matrix: Soil Dilution: 2





L

~-J '~

Professional Service Industries, Inc. Lawrence Analytical Division

PSI-Milwaukee Project: Wisconsin Bell Billing Center Project number: 052-24035

\. .. Respectfully Submitted

Lawrence Organic Chemi Department Manager

ANALYTICAL REPORT

/o-at-42-Date

59423020-22432 October 28, 1992


PSI-Milwaukee 59423020-22432 Project: Wisconsin Bell Billing Center October 28, 1992 Project number: 052-24035

CLIENT# DETECTION (LAB#) ANALYTE RESULT LIMIT UNITS METHOD

MW-3 TPH-Extractable 3510/8015 636160 Diesel Range

Organics 0.16 0.1 mgjl 3510/8015

Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons Acenaphthene <2.0 2.0 ugjL 8310 Acenaphthylene <4.0 4.0 ugjl 8310 Anthracene <0.2 0.2 ugjl 8310 Benzo (a) anthracene <0.2 0.2 ugjL 8310 Benzo (a) pyrene <0.2 0.2 ugjl 8310 Benzo (b) fluoranthene <0.4 0.4 ugjl 8310 Benzo (k) fluoranthene <0.2 0.2 ugjl 8310 Benzo (ghi) perylene <0.4 0.4 ugjl 8310 Chrysene <0.2 0.2 ugjl 8310 Dibenzo (a, h) anthracene< 0.4 0.4 ugjl 8310 Fluoranthene <0.4 0.4 ugj l 8310 Fluorene <0.4 0.4 ugjl 8310 lndeno (1 ,2,3-cd) pyrene<0.2 0.2 ugjl 8310 Naphthalene <2.0 2.0 ugjl 8310 Phenanthrene <2.0 0.2 ugjl 8310 Pyrene <0.2 0.2 ugjl 8310

:l

PSI-Milwaukee 59423020-22432 Project: Wisconsin Bell Billing Center October 28, 1 992 Project number: 052-24035

CLIENT# DETECTION (lAB#) ANALYTE RESULT LIMIT UNITS METHOD


Organics <0.1 0.1 mgjl 3510/8015

Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons Acenaphthene <2.0 2.0 ugjl 8310 Acenaphthylene <4.0 4.0 ugjl 8310 Anthracene <0.2 0.2 ugjl 8310 Benzo (a) anthracene <0.2 0.2 ugjl 8310 - Benzo (a) pyrene <0.2 0.2 ugjl 8310 Benzo (b) fluoranthene <0.4 0.4 ugjl 8310 Benzo (k) fluoranthene <0.2 0.2 ugjl 8310

L Benzo (ghi) perylene <0.4 0.4 ugjl 8310 Chrysene <0.2 0.2 ugjl 8310 Dibenzo (a,h) anthracene<0.4 0.4 ugjl 8310 Fluoranthene <0.4 0.4 ugjl 8310 Fluorene <0.4 0.4 ugjL 8310 lndeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene<0.2 0.2 ugjl 8310 Naphthalene <2.0 2.0 ug/L 8310 Phenanthrene <2.0 0.2 ugjl 8310 Pyrene <0.2 0.2 ugjl 8310

Field Blank TPH-Extractable 3510/8015 636162 Diesel Range

Organics 0.7 0.1 mgjl 3510/8015


Client: PSI-Milwaukee Project No.: 59423020

Matrix: (soil/water) WATER

Lab File ID: A4869

COMPOUND

Dichlorodifluoromethane Chloromethane Vinyl Chloride Bromomethane Chloroethane Trichlorofluoromethane 1,1-Dichloroethene Acetone Carbon Disulfide Methylene Chloride . TERT BUTYL METHYL ETHER tert Butyl alcohol Di-isopropyl ether trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1,1-Dichloroethane 2,2-Dichloropropane cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 2-Butanone Chloroform Bromochloromethane 1,1,1-Trichloroethane Carbon Tetrachloride 1,1-Dichloropropene Benzene 1,2-Dichloroethane Trichloroethene 1,2-Dichloropropane Bromodichloromethane Dibromomethane 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone Toluene 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1,2-Dibromoethane cis-1 ,3 -Dichloropropene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene

RQL = REQUIRED QUANTITATION LIMIT U NOT DETECTED J DETECTED BELOW RQL

RQL

5 10 10 10 10 5 5

10 5 5 5

100 -- 5 5 5 5 5

10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5

10 5 5 5 5 5

MW-3

Lab Sample ID: 636160~ Date Analyzed: 10/23/92

ug/L Detected

u u u u u u u

2 J u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u

- -

E COMPOUND CONCENTRATION EXCEEDS CALIBRATION CURVE B COMPOUND DETECTED IN METHOD BLANK

ii

PSI/ Hall-Kimbrell Page 2

Sample ID VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET



Lab File ID: A4869

COMPOUND

1,3-Dichloropropane 2-Hexanone Dibromochloromethane Tetrachloroethene Chlorobenzene 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane Ethyl benzene Xylene (m-,p-) a-Xylene Styrene Bromoform Isopropyl benzene 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Bromo benzene 1,2,3-Trichloropropane n-Propylbenzene 2-Chlorotoluene 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 4-Chlorotoluene tert-Butylbenzene 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene sec-Butyl benzene p-Isopropyltoluene 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1,4-Dichlorobenzene n-Butylbenzene 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 1,2,4,-Trichlorobenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Naphthalene 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene


RQL

5 10 -- 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5

MW-3


ug/L Detected

u u u u u u u u

' u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u



Client: PSI-Milwaukee Project 'No.: 59423020

Ma t rix: (soil / water) WATER

Lab File ID: A4870

COMPOUND

Dichlorodifluoromethane Chloromethane Vinyl Chloride Bromomethane Chloroethane Trichlorofluoromethane 1,1-Dichloroethene Acetone Carbon Disul fi de Methylene Chloride TERT BUTYL METHYL ETHER tert Butyl alcohol Di-isopropyl ether trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1, 1-Dichloroethane 2,2-Dichloropropane cis-1 , 2-Dichloroethene 2-Butanone Chloroform Bromochloromethane 1,1,1-Trichloroethane Carbon Tetrachloride 1,1-Dichloropropene Benzene 1,2-Dichloroethane Trichloroethene 1,2-Dichloropropane Bromodichloromethane Dibromomethane 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone Toluene 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1,2-Dibromoethane ci s-1,3 -Dichloropropene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene


RQL

5 10 10 10 10 5 5

10 5 5 5

100 -- 5 5 5 5 5

10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5

10 5 5 5 5 5

MW-2

Lab Sample ID: 636161~j


ug/L Detected

u u u u u u u

3 J u

1 B J u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u --

E COMPOUND CONCENTRAT ION EXCEEDS CALIBRATION CURVE B COMP OUND DETECTED IN METHOD BLANK

n





Lab File ID: A4870

COMPOUND

1,3-Dichloropropane 2-Hexanone Dibromochloromethane Tetrachloroethene Chlorobenzene 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane Ethyl benzene Xylene (m-,p-) o-Xylene Styrene Bromoform Isopropyl benzene 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Bromo benzene 1,2,3-Trichloropropane n-Propylbenzene 2-Chlorotoluene 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 4-Chlorotoluene tert-Butylbenzene 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene sec-Butyl benzene p-Isopropyltoluene 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1,4-Dichlorobenzene n-Butylbenzene 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 1,2,4,-Trichlorobenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Naphthalene 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene


RQL

5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5

MW-2

Lab Sample ID: 636161~j


ug/L Detected

u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u --


. I




Lab File ID: A4868

COMPOUND

Dichlorodifluoromethane Chloromethane Vinyl Chloride Bromomethane Chloroethane Trichlorofluoromethane 1,1-Dichloroethene Acetone Carbon Disulfide Methylene Chloride TERT BUTYL METHYL ETHER tert Butyl alcohol Di-isopropyl ether trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1,1-Dichloroethane 2,2-Dichloropropane cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 2-Butanone Chloroform Bromochloromethane 1,1,1-Trichloroethane Carbon Tetrachloride 1,1-Dichloropropene Benzene 1,2-Dichloroethane Trichloroethene 1,2-Dichloropropane Bromodichloromethane Dibromomethane 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone Toluene 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1,2-Dibromoethane cis-1,3-Dichloropropene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene


RQL

5 10 --10 -- 10 --10 --5 5

10 --5 5 5

100 --5 5 5 5 5

10 --5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5

10 --5 5 5 5 5

Field Blank

Lab Sample ID: 6361621\~ Date Analyzed: 10/23/92

ug/L Detected

u u u u u u u

9 J u u u u u u u u u

20 u u

22 u u u u u u u u u

2 J - u

u u u --

E COMPOUND CONCENTRATION EXCEEDS CALIBRATION CURVE B COMPOUND DETECTED IN METHOD BLANK

l PSI I Hall-Kimbrell

VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

Client: PSI-Milwaukee

Page 2 Sample ID

Field Blank Project No.: 59423020

I[ Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 636162 4'\~ Date Analyzed: 10/23/92

ug/L

f I Lab File ID: A4868

Ill

COMPOUND

1,3-Dichloropropane 2-Hexanone Dibromochloromethane Tetrachloroethene Chlorobenzene 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane Ethyl benzene Xylene (m-, p-) o-Xylene Styrene Bromoform Isopropyl benzene 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Bromo benzene 1,2,3-Trichloropropane n-Propylbenzene 2-Chlorotoluene 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 4-Chlorotoluene tert-Butylbenzene 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene sec-Butyl benzene p-Isopropyltoluene 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1,4-Dichlorobenzene n-Butylbenzene 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 1,2,4,-Trichlorobenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Naphthalene 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene


RQL Detected

5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5


u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u --

,-'

I

II




Lab File ID: A4879

COMPOUND

Dichlorodifluoromethane Chloromethane Vinyl Chloride Bromomethane Chloroethane Trichlorofluoromethane 1,1-Dichloroethene Acetone Carbon Disulfide Methylene Chlori~e TERT BUTYL METHYL ETHER tert Butyl alcohol Di-isopropyl ether trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1,1-Dichloroethane 2,2-Dichloropropane cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 2-Butanone Chloroform Bromochloromethane 1,1,1-Trichloroethane Carbon Tetrachloride 1,1-Dichloropropene Benzene 1,2-Dichloroethane Trichloroethene 1,2-Dichloropropane Bromodichloromethane Dibromomethane 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone Toluene 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1,2-Dibromoethane cis-1,3-Dichloropropene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene


RQL

5 10 10 10 10 5 5

10 5 5 5

100 -- 5 5 5 5 5

10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5

10 5 5 5 5 5

VBLK455

Lab Sample ID: VBLK455~~ Date Analyzed: 10/23/92

ug/L Detected

u u u u u u u u u

1 J u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u --


I





Lab File ID: A4879

COMPOUND RQL

1,3-Dichloropropane 2-Hexanone Dibromochloromethane Tetrachloroethene Chlorobenzene 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane Ethyl benzene Xylene (m-,p-) a-Xylene Styrene_ Bromoform Isopropyl benzene 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Bromo benzene 1,2,3-Trichloropropane n-Propylbenzene 2-Chlorotoluene 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 4-Chlorotoluene tert-Butylbenzene 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene sec-Butyl benzene p-Isopropyltoluene 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1,4-Dichlorobenzene n-Butylbenzene 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane ___ 1,2,4,-Trichlorobenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Naphthalene 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene


5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5

VBLK455

Lab Sample ID: VBLK455~~ Date Analyzed: 10/23/92

ug/L Detected

u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u


PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES 4B20 West 15th Street Lawrence, Kansas 66049

Surrogate Recovery

GCMS Organic Analysis -- Method: B260~~ Analysis type:

Client: PSI-Milwaukee

Client Sample: VBLK455 PSI Sample: VBLK455 Matrix: Water Oil uti on:


1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 B9 76-114 Toluene-dB 94 BB-110

Bromofluorobenzene 90 B6-115

Client Sample: Field Blank PSI Sample: 636162 Matrix: Water Dilution:


1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 94 76-114 Toluene-dB 99 BB-110

Bromofluorobenzene 9B B6-115

Client Sample: MW-3 PSI Sample: 636160 Matrix: Water Dilution:


1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 93 76-114 Toluene-dB 95 BB-110


Client Sample: MW-2 PSI Sample: 636161 Matrix: Water Oil uti on:


1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 95 76-114 Toluene-dB 9B BB-110



1

1

1

1

~-J 1.~

Professional Service Industries, Inc. Lawrence Analytical Division

ANALYTICAL REPORT


Respectfully Submitted

vv~ &VtW=-_> Lawrence Organic ChemistrY Department Manager

4820 W. 15th Street • Lawrence, KS 66049

J

/-1~-13 Date

• Phone: 913/749-2381

59423020-22432 Original Report: October 28, 1992 Revised Report: January 15, 1993

• Fax: 913/865-9587


CLIENT# (LAB#)

MW-3 636160

ANALYTE

TPH-Extractable Diesel Range* Organics

RESULT

0.16

Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons Acenaphthene <2.0 Acenaphthylene < 4.0 Anthracene < 0.2 Benzo (a) anthracene <0.2 Benzo (a) pyrene < 0.2 Benzo (b) fluoranthene <0.4 Benzo (k) fluoranthene <0.2 Benzo (ghi) perylene < 0.4 Chrysene < 0.2 Dibenzo (a,h) anthracene<0.4 Ruoranthene < 0.4 Fluorene < 0.4 lndeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene<0.2 Naphthalene < 2.0 Phenanthrene <2.0 Pyrene <0.2

DETECTION LIMIT

0.1

2.0 4.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.2 2.0 0.2 0.2

59423020-22432 Original Report: October 28, 1992 Revised Report: January 15, 1993

UNITS

mgjL

ugjL ugjl ugjl ugjL ugjl ugjL ugfL ug/L ug/L ugfL ugjl ug/L ug/L ugfL ug/L ug/L

METHOD

3510/8015

3510/8015

8310 8310 8310

·8310 8310 8310 8310 8310 8310 8310 8310 8310 8310 8310 8310 8310

I

* = Unidentified organic compounds in the C18 to C20 range unrelated to commercial petroleum fractions. Pattern is also quite different from that found in the field blank.

PSI-Milwaukee 59423020-22432 Project: Wisconsin Bell Billing Center Original Report: October 28, 1992 Project number: 052-24035 Revised Report: January 15, 1993

CLIENT# DETECTION --rv (LAB#) ANALYTE RESULT LIMIT UNITS METHOD


Organics <0.1 0.1 mgjl 3510/8015

Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons Acenaphthene <2.0 2.0 ugjl 8310 Acenaphthylene <4.0 4.0 ugjl 8310 Anthracene <0.2 0.2 ugjl 8310 Benzo (a) anthracene <0.2 0.2 ugjl 8310 Benzo (a) pyrene <0.2 0.2 ugjl 8310 Benzo (b) fluoranthene <0.4 0.4 ugfl 8310 Benzo (k) fluoranthene <0.2 0.2 ugjl 8310 Benzo (ghi) perylene <0.4 0.4 ugjl 8310 Chrysene <0.2 0.2 ugjl 8310 Dibenzo (a,h) anthracene<0.4 0.4 ugjl 8310 Auoranthene <0.4 0.4 ugjL 8310 Fluorene <0.4 0.4 ugjl 8310

r lndeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene<0.2 0.2 ug/L 8310 Naphthalene <2.0 2.0 ug/L 8310 Phenanthrene <2.0 0.2 ugjl 8310 Pyrene <0.2 0.2 ug/L 8310

Field Blank TPH-Extractable 3510/8015 636162 Diesel Range*

Organics 0.7 0.1 mgjl 3510/8015

* = Unidentified organic compounds of C1 o to C20 range unrelated in pattern to commercial petroleum products; such as diesel kerosene and fuel oil.

J )

• (---. ( CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD fPSi/ Professional Service Industries, Inc.

PROJECT NAME REPORT TO INVOICE TO

~W~:=~~~L=l~6~~'~~~~~~~~~~.r~~~~=~~-~~~;[~w=~~·~=~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~BORMORYSUBMITIEDT~ PROJECT NUMBER J PROJECT MANAGER ADDRESS

072-- 2-4o~5 rJI.c~c.J DirSt.(bacL _::;.__;::_ _____ ....,c.~:..=-------+--'---"'-"-'-~"-'-..,---'--~----·-----+-----·----------P.O. NUMBER ADDRESS (~trc) CITY I STATE I ZIP

0 6913 Hwy. 225 Deer Park, TX 77536 (713) 479-8307

~0 W. 15th Street Lawrence, KS 66049 (800) 548-7901

~ '845 N 351H _ _)=.,T'---+----- ----------1 0 6056 Ulmerton Road

Clearwater, FL 34620 0 850 Poplar Street

Pittsburgh, PA 15220 (412) 922-4000

REQUIRED DUE DATE CITY I STATE/ZIP ATTENTION (813) 531-1446 fv{; f\,J. W-r:.

··--- . - ·--·------------------------------+---------------1 SAMPLES TO LAB VIA

(~d Ex NUMBER OF COOLERS

/ TRANSFER RELINQUISHED BY

SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION

TELEPHONE

FAX

REPORT VIA

ACCEPTED BY

VERBAL FAX

U.S. MAIUOVERNIGHT

SEAL

TELEPHONE

f~~!!'(::·:~~-:~~::;:·.:: ~ :·:::- ·- ·., .:·; 1> LABORAToRY use ONLY.~it~~:B;~Ir~:.~:~l!:~·.~.~:~ ?~f:,:~::J . ANAL YnCAL DUE DATE :t I 0 J Z 4 .:: .. :·.:· · ·· :·· i:.:·,''.t~·.:-t::;:;:;A;.,:;:,}::·.;;,·•.:.~~~\";~·-:;

A

L I] //; 11 ADDITIONALREMARKS_~~~-----~~~--~-~~--~--r~~-f-t-ft-'/-h'/'-;;;--rf-./f-/-i--;~r-,..,/l'f-lljf--7%/+//'--~--~-

_______ .... _- ------. ___________ SAMPLER'S SIGNATlJRE // £[/fJ ~OJ)/ //LA$ Vt(~ (/ " v

.l

,··.· J

'

CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD INVOICE TO

PROJECT NUMBER ADDRESS

P.O. NUMBER CITY I STATE I ZIP

Ill I

/R.,SiJ Professional Service Industries, Inc.

0 6913 Hwy. 225 Deer Park, TX 77536 (713) 479-8307

~820 W. 15th Street Lawrence, KS 66049 (BOO) 548-7901 ADDRESS (_')rfc)

1-----------l-~B~4.:.,5.:=__..LA!>!.J-----L.?-"· 5!_1_«_/)_~_. --.f------------1 o 6056 Ulmerton Road 0 850 Poplar Street Pittsburgh, PA 15220 (412) 922-4000

REQUIRED DUE DATE

SAMPLES TO LAB VIA

NUMBER OF COOLERS

SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION

Q-( & .s.~s.s B.{~ f3-tS'"

.CJTY I STATE I ZIP ATTENTION Clearwater, FL 34620

f"Li{w. lJ:r. (813)531-1446

TELEPHONE

FAX REPORT VIA VERBAL FAX

U.S. MAIUOVERNIGHT

TELEPHONE

~/t\f•i;';:·:;•\· . : . ' LABORj\TORY USE ONLY''(·:~/f;-'!1,! y:;· .:. . : ·;. · ::ANALYTICAL DUE DATE 'l/.Z.4t'·'\'!i; ,;·;~--··:;(· ... :/·:: :J·-·~-:. ::-·,:

DATE/TIME

/1..:06

n~ Z..o ·z.:oo 2·.Zo B

lr~i~l3~:: 7 y. 1-,c x '1-1\:/z~ ~~ ~ x }{ )\_ x.

ADDITIONALREMARKS ________________________ ~/'\iltA_JH--:-=--A,_---::-.Hl-t(l~ ..... u-!JII,71-m\--J-=--------________________________ SAMPLER'S SIGNATURE-J.fl..u.D'f.JULlfN\...::..u-7JlCJ.<,~~_:·I~~.=.::.__--.JJ..((J!VJ!Q.g;...::....::...f _____ _

-- ·ur. ~·

,--- 11

CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD r.:;;;;;J le:!!J Professional Service Industries, Inc.

~~~~. ~E~T ~iM~ • tl.~. A ~h. ler REPORf TO • n 1.lfl_:~-~--'(XJ).'p.c"-'--~(/l,U<-='-'--'-V"'~'"+_l< (1..-Vi~(M.,!.lovi=t---._~.~~~ lABORATORY SUBMITIED TO:

PROJECT NUMBER I _ftf':J:T MjiA&l!l:::!~~=-J----[--A-DD_R_E_S_S _________ ~

INVOICE TO

r r o 6913 Hwy. 22s It ir')[{Alqtij _,. Deer Park, TX ns36

ADDRESS (Sif(;) CITY/STATE/ZIP (713)479-8307 P.O. NUMBER

~ 4820 W. 15th Street

Lawrence, KS 66049 (800) 548-7901

l----:=---=~--------t---=-3---:4_:_t;_!_t-J___.:)~f1ll=---cj....!L!··=-----I -----------J 0 6056 Ulmerton Road REQUIRED DUE DATE CITY 1 STATE I ZIP ATTENTIO~ Clearwater, FL 34620

0 850 Poplar Street Pittsburgh, PA 15220 (412) 922-4000 ________ Jflw W-r.. (813)531-1446

SAMPLES TO lAB VIA TELEPHONE TELEPHONE

FAX NUMBER OF COOLERS REPORT VIA VERBAL FAX ·' ': · ·. ': ·'~F-· •· LABORATOFW.USEONLY -.··. ·. :_-;;-:;·~.!f;>::.\.:.

U.S. MAIUOVERNIGHT ANALYTICAi..DUE DATE. 9/?, {)'-~I~(~j;_;- :•":- .· :.:-~:_·;<;';;';. · ::;·

E~t.): . l---------------~--------+-----r----r~~~-·-~-,_~--+-~---~~-,_-1-+--+--r-~---r---r--r----------------l~

t;~}:X: V): ~~?:M:;~ ::· . ---+--+--r--+--+---+---r.--+---+--t--t--r-r--r---t---+-------------{~

r------------~----------r----~----~~~~t---~~-r~--T-~-+--r-~--r-T--r-~-+~--+------------------~~ ··--·--·----- ---- :~~~~11t\::;_ -t--t------------1~ ___ ,__ _, ______ \A~f~J::':{:- ··--~--- --f---1--f--1--J--J---t--t--li----1 u.

:~·2t·:~\:t . 1 ;/ 1 /) -hr~-;1-:-------i .<:_

------~~~L II ;, 1£ - '/ II n __ SAMPLER'S SIGNATUR;_nNitJ .. #/.,1'_ /_f'bi..J .

ADDITIONAL REMARKS ____ ------------------

~:t"~ •. ::.~ .. • - , .

CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD tn;;;J

'~ Professional Service Industries, Inc.

PROJECT NAME REPORT TO . INVOICE TO

~~=:~~~~~~l~~~;~~~-~~C~~~~·r~~~~~~-~~~i~'~=~=·£~~e~~~~~~~~~~~~~~BOR~ORYSUBMI~EDT~ PROJECT NUMBER 1 PROJECT MANAGER ADDRESS

rJI;JcJ 6irSt~bacl 0 6913 Hwy. 225

CITY I STATE/ZIP Deer Park, TX 77536 (713) 479-8307 ADDRESS ('.. t"tc)

l-------------+-i?_e....:G:...:0=--~845'::..:...."--JJ~_·3=5_-rH_s=..!....r--J-------------i o 6056 Ulmerton Road

P.O. NUMBER

REQUIRED DUE DATE

SAMPLES TO LAB VIA

(tel Ex NUMBER OF COOLERS

CITY I STATE I ZIP ATTENTION Clearwater, FL 34620 lA I (813)531-1446 jV(; I.J. W-r..

TELEPHONE

FAX

REPORT VIA

TELEPHONE

VERBAL FAX

r.a2o W. 15th Street Lawrence, KS 66049 (800) 548-7901

0 850 Poplar Street Pittsburgh, PA 15220 (412) 922-4000

I U.S. MAIUOVERNIGHT :ANALYTICALDUEDATE ID/2-4·:·.:, .. : · :,; .·. ;.·c•, ;: . .-.::'·.- ··

lj ffi PARAMETER LIST ~----~--------------~----------------~--~----~ z j/ · .' .LABORATORYUSEONLY·-;·.,:.::.:,,.•~~ .:·:·.: •.:.< · ·:·:.~J. g

SAMPLECUSTODIANJ: ·. ,.'~·'',' DATE/TIME i;f/,~~Yj':' :;i:-i·~. ..·,·,, 8 ' ZLn •.Jee · :·.< .;: f'~} tc{jq•:z.·: · .· • .: . ·. .· ·· ~

LAB USE~,; ffi \) J ONLY :'/ ~ :::::.'V Q. 't:t-.Y_ C'l~ SOIL-S

SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION DATE/TIME

liJ/1(., It:~~

1~,.., ll :4s-10//b ll:o.;

COM P-C GRAB-B

& (3.

e:.

LAB NUMBER. ~ y WATER·W WASTE-X

l.J ~

IJv

ADDITIONAL REMARKS ______ ·------- ----------------------r~---,ft-fl·l--f\!...,_L_jL -~-.,._jjL. _fl_v<-fj ______ _ __________________________ SAMPLER'S SIGNATURE // !Af!J >\. OJf /,/lAtt V[fh

(/ "

~isconsin Department of Industry, ,.-- Labor and Human Relations UNDERGROUND

PETROLEUM PRODUCT

TANK INVENTORY

Send Completed Form To:

,- ...

r·

For Office Use Only:

Tank ID #

Safety & Buildings Division P.O. Box 7969 Madison, WI 53707 Telephone (608) 267-5280

This form is to be completed pursuant to Section 101.142, Wis. Stats., to register all underground tanks in Wisconsin that

have stored or currently store petroleum or regulated substances. Please see the reverse side for additional information on this program. An underground storage tank is defined as any tank with at least 10 percent of its total volume (included piping) located below ground level. A separate form is needed for each tank. Send each completed form to the agency designated in the top right corner.

This reg1stration applies to a tan I: that is (c.~d: one): Fire Department Prov1dmg Fire Coverage 1. 0 In Use 4.~ .A6"l'R'1~- Tank Removed 8. 0 Changed Ownership \!)ere Tank Is Located Is In: 2. 0 Abandoned With Product 6. 0 Abandoned· Filled With \J (Indicate new owner .)3{ City 0 Village . 0 Town of

3. 0 Abandoned No Product (empty) Inert M4terial \) J in section A. 4. below)

1 I /

orW1thWater 7. 0 OutofService 1/2> ?J._ } 11 r.J C.J.i.. .QJ) A. IDENTlFICA TlON: (Please Print)

1. Installation N~me +~ 1\ • 2. Mailing Name if Different Than /11 .

s :)1. ~v l\\_~v'r-( Wisconsin Bell - Jeff Haas Installation Street A~~ess -~~~.., sl 0 Mailing Address If DiHerent Than # 1

~ i- J\.) Nl7 W24300 Rivervood Dr. - 1st Floor

~City · \ IY\,w

0 Village 0 Townof: fiJ City . Waukesha

0 Village 0 Townof:

State '-'--'~ I Zi~~3to Y- I County State .l Zip Code I County

WI 53188 3. Name of Contact Person

Wisconsin Bell - Jeff Haas 4. Owner Name if OiHerent Than #3

Street Address Street Address N17 W24300 Rivervood Dr. - 1st Floor

00 City 0 Town 0 Village of: Waukesha

I State WI

l ZipCode 53188

OCity 0 Town I State I_ ZipCode 0 Villageof:

County I Telephone No. (include area code) County I Telephone No. (include area code) 414 523-1774

5. Tank Age (date imt:alled, it known: Of' yeMS old} 16. Tank C~g~lom} 17. Tank Manufaaurer's Name (if l:nown) (_ ( () . .

B. TYPE OF USER (check one): 1. 0 Gas Station 5. 0 Industrial 9. 0 Agricultural

2. 0 Bull: Storage 6. 0 Government

10 .... 0 Other(spe<ify):

I

3. ~ Utility 7. 0 School

4. 0 Mercant1le 8. 0 Residential

C. TANK CONSTRUCTION: 1. 0 Bare Steel 2. 0 Cathodially Protected and Coated Steel (a. 0 Sacrifid~l Anodes or b. O lmpr~ Current) 3. 0 Co.ated Steel 6. 0 Relined

4 . ..J6 Fiberglass 5. 0 Other (spe<ify): 7. 0· Steel· Fiberglass Reinforced Plastic Composite 9. 0 Unknown

Approval: 1. 0 Nat'! Std. 2.

Overfill Protection Provided? Tank leak detectiOn method: 1.

.4.

D. PIPiNG CONSTRUCTION

0 Ul 3. 0 Other: 0 Yes 0 No If yes. ide · pe: 0 Automatic tani: gauging 0 Inventory control and tightness testing

2. 0 Vapar monitoring 5. 0 lnter.t1tial monitoring

Is Tank Double Walled? 0 Yes 0 No

Spill Cootamment? 0 Yes 0 No 3. 0 Groundwater monrtor~ng 6. 0 Not required at present

1. 0 Bare Steel 2. 0 Cathodically Protected and Coated or Wrapped StHI (a. 0 Sacrifi<ial Anodes or b. O Impressed Current) 3. 0 Coated Steel 4. 0 Fiberglass 5. O Other (spedfy): 9. 0 Unknown

Pipmg System Type: 1. 0 Pressurized piping with: a. 0 auto shutoH; b. O alarm; or c. 0 flow restrictor 2. 0 Suction piping with check valve at tank 3. 0 Suction piping with ~!t v•lve at pump and impectable

Piping leak detection method:~ if pressurized or check valve at tank: 1. O Vapar monitori09 2. 0 lntemiti•l monitoring 3. 0 Groundwater monitoring 4. 0 r~ghtness testing 5. 0 Une Leal: Detector 6. 0 Not Required

Approval: 1. 0 Nat'l Std 2. 0 UL 3. 0 Otiar: Double Walled: 0 Yes 0 No

E. TANK CONTENTS

1. ~ Diesel 2. 0 Le~ 3. 0 Unle~ed 4. 0 Fuel Oil 5. 0 Gasohol 6. 0 OtNr 7. 0 Empty 8. 0 Sand/Gravel/Slurry 9. 0 Unknown 10. 0 Premix 11. 0 Wast110il 12. 0 Propane

13. 0 Chemical* 14. 0 Kerosene 15. 0 Av1at1on ,.

If # 13 is che<:l:ed, indicate the chemial n~m~) or numbef(s} of the chemical or w~ste.

If Tank Abandoned, Give D~te (moldaylyr): I Hu asite~ent~~leted? (s.eer~sideforcietails) es ONo

--If installation of a new tank is being reparted, indicate who performed th4 installatJon inspection:

1. 0 Fire Dep.artment I / 2. 0 DILHR 3. 0 Other(identify)

Signature of P'erse ~ yJ'eti"Ueport: Date Sini;: Q 19_1 \_ 42 . / qoV'J

Sll0-7.t37CR. (}9/8t \YU j

---:-}Nis:.::onsin Department ?f Industry, · labor and Human Relat1ons CHECKLIST FOR UNDERGROUND

TANK CLOSURE

RETURN COMPLETED CHECKLIST TO: Safety & Buildings Division

Complete one form for -each site closure.

IDENTIFICATION: (Please Print) 1. Site Name

3. Closure Company Name (Print) Il!/wcwoe_+h. Corz.P

Indicate whether closure is for: I8J Tank System f 2. Owner Name

' ~,."-rer w ;s \\

Town of:

Closure Company Street Address,

&IS S 95+

Fire Prevention & Underground Storage Tank Section P. 0. Box 7969, Madison, WI 53707

0Tank Only 0 Piping Only

Closure Company Telephone No. (include area code) Closure Company City, State, Zip Code ( t.fll/ 1 '/7(.- S/70 --m;fw w/scon ;JJ S3:2o I 4. Name of Company! Performing Closure Assessment

D e.orc:5s - ~ <:.L rt cc....t, r No . f'JL Telephone# (include area code Certified Assessor Name (Print) Assessor Certification No.

! 4£4 > "7B2-/ boo 1c:k c~ .(JZb13

Tank 10 #

I{) 00 N

N

N

N

0· 0 0 OY ON ..,.. Indicate which product by numeric code: 01·Diesel; 02-leaded; 03-Unleaded; 04-Fuel Oil; 05-Gasohol; 06·0ther; 09-Unknown: 1 0-Premix;

11-Waste oil; 13-Chemical (indicate the chemical name(s) or numbers(s) ; 14-Kerosene; 15-Aviation.

~ritten notification was provided to the local agent 15 days in advance of closure date. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D Y !_., .All local permits were obtained before beginning closure. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (2] Y

ON ON

DNA DNA

Check applicable box at right in response to all statements in Sections B - E. f"l B. TEMPORARILY OUT OF SERVICE

Written Inspector approval of temporary closure obtained, which is effective until (provide date)-----------1 . Product Removed

L a. Product lines drained into tank (or other container) and resulting liquid removed, AND ....... . b. All product removed to bottom of suction line, OR ................................... . c. All product removed to within 1 • of bottom. . ....................................... .

2. Fill pipe, gauge pipe, tank truck vapor recovery fittings, and vapor return lines capped. . ........ . 3. All product lines at the islands or pumps located elsewhere are removed and capped, OR ....... . 4. Dispensers/pumps left in place but locked and power disconnected. . ...................... . 5. Vent lines left open. . ........................................................... . 6. Inventory form filed indicating temporary closure. · ...................................... .

C. CLOSURE BY REMOVAL

1. Product from piping drained into tank (or other container). . .............................. . 2. Piping disconnected from tank and removed. . ........................................ . 3. All liquid and residue removed from tank using explosion proof pumps or hand pumps. . ........ . 4. All pump motors and suction hoses bonded to tank or otherwise grounded. . ................. . 5. Fill pipes, gauge pipes, vapor recovery connections, submersible pumps and other fixtures removed.

NOTE: DROP TUBE SHOULD NOT BE REMOVED IF THE TANK IS TO BE PURGED THROUGH THE USE OF AN EDUCTOR.

6. Vent lines left connected until tanks purged. . ......................................... . 7. Tank openings temporarily plugged so vapors exit through vent. .......................... . 8. Tank atmosphere reduced to 10% of the lower flammable range (LEL)- see Section F .......... . 9. Tank removed from excavaticn after PURGING/INERTING; placed on level ground and ':)locked

to prevent movement. ........................................................... . 10. Tank cleaned before being removed being removed from site. . ........................... .

SBD·8951 (R. 12/91) ·CONTINUE ON NEXT PAGE·

Remover lnsQector NA Verified Verified

OY ON 0 0

OY ON 0 0 OY ON 0 0 OY ON 0 0 OY ON 0 0 OY ON 0 0 OY ON 0 0 OY ON 0 0 OY ON 0 0

!l]Y ON 0 0 elY ON 0 0 0Y ON 0 0 JUY ON 0 0 [Z]Y ON 0 0

~.YON 0 0 ~yON 0 0 [3Y 0 N 0 0

[2]'Y 0 N 0 0 !2JY 0 N 0 0

Remover Inspector NA Venf1ed Verified

PJ'YON 0 0 ··cLOSURE BY REMOVAL (continued)

11. Tank labeled in 2" high letters after removal but before being moved from site. . .............. . . --

1

NOTE: COMPLETE TANK LABELING SHOULD INCLUDE WARNING AGAINST REUSE; FORMER CONTENTS; VAPOR STATE; VAPOR FREEING TREATMENT; DATE.

12. Tank vent hole (1/8 th • in uppermost part of tank) installed prior to moving the tank from site. . .. . (2!Y0N OYON c;3Y0N

0 0 0

0 0 0

13. Inventory form filed by owner with Safety and Buildings Division indicating closure by removal. ... . 14. Site security is provided while the excavation is open. . ................................. .

:J. CLOSURE IN PLACE NOTE: CLOSURES IN PLACE ARE ONLY ALLOWED WITH THE PRIOR WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRY, LABOR AND HUMAN RELATIONS OR LOCAL AGENT.

1. Product from piping drained into tank (or other container). 2. Piping disconnected from tank and removed. . ........................................ . 3. All liquid and residue removed from tank using explosion proof pumps or hand pumps. . ........ . 4. All pump motors and suction hoses bonded to tank or otherwise grounded. . ................. . 5. Fill pipes, gauge pipes, vapor recovery connections, submersible pumps and other fixtures removed.

NOTE: DROP TUBE SHOULD NOT BE REMOVED IF THE TANK IS TO BE PURGED THROUGH THE USE OF AN EDUCTOR- EDUCTOR OUTPUT 12FT ABOVE GRADE.

6. Vent lines left connected until tanks purged. . ......................................... . 7. Tank openings temporarily plugged so vapors exit through vent. .......................... . 8. Tank atmosphere reduced to 10% of the lower flammable range (LEL)- see Section F .......... . 9. Tank properly cleaned to remove all sludge and residue. . ............................... .

10. Solid inert material {sand, cyclone boiler slag, pea gravel recommended) introduced and tank filled. 11. Vent line disconnected or removed. . .........•...................................... 12. Inventory form filed by owner with Safety and Buildings Division indicating closure in place. . .....

'

, ... E. CLOSURE ASSESSMENTS • l K NOTE: DETERMINE IF A CLOSURE ASSESSMENT IS REQUIRED BY REFERRING TO ILHR 10. · 1. Individual conducting the assessment has a closure assessment plan {written) which

is used as the basis for their work on the site. . ........................................ .

I · 2. Do points of obvious contamination exist? .... ·n_·_· .. '(\_·.) ...•............•..•......... 3. Are there strong odors in the soils? ... -t~- .~kt\.l.l ............................. . 4. Was a field screening instrument used to pre-screen soil sample locations? .................. . 5. Was a closure assessment omitted because of obvious contamination? ..................... . 6. Was the DNA notified of suspected or obvious contamination? . . . . . . . .................... .

OYON OYON OYON OYON

OYON OYON OYON OYON OYON OYON OYON

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0

Agency, office and person contacted: =-~~=~~~-=-'~...,x~..~-=:=-:.......,~-:-~=-"'.,.......--::---::-----,---::::or-==:-7. Contamination suspected because of: g Odor @:Soil Staining 0 Free ProductO Sheen On Groundwater Field Instrument Test

r· F. METHOD OF ACHIEVING 10% LEVEL DESCRIPTION I ~Educator Or Diffused Air Blower ·

Eductor driven by compressed air, bonded and drop tube left in place; vapors discharged minimum of 12 feet above ground. Diffused air blower bonded and drop tube removed. Air pressure not exceeding 5 psig.

0Dry Ice Dry ice introduced at 1.5 pounds per 100 gallons of tank capacity. Dry ice crushed and distributed over the greatest possible tank area. Dry ice evaporated before proceeding.

0 Inert Gas (C0/2 or N/2) NOTE: INERT GASSES PRODUCE AN OXYGEN DEFICIENT ATMOSPHERE. THE TANK MAY NOT BE ENTERED IN THIS STATE WITHOUT SPECIAL EQUIPMENT Gas introduced through a single opening at a point near the bottom of the tank at the end of the tank opposite the vent. Gas introduced under low pressure not to exceed 5 psig to reduce static electricity. Gas introducing device grounded.

0 Tank atmosphere monitored for flammable or combustible vapor levels. Calibrate combustible gas indicator. Drop tube removed prior to checking atmosphere. Tank space monitored at bottom, middle and upper portion of tank. Readings of 10% or less of the lower flammable range {LEL) obtained before removing tank from ground.

G. NOTE SPECIFIC PROBLEMS OR NONCOMPLIANCE ISSUES BELOW .L 1 f S11

•. J, c;. i)J. fnr>. kJ ' Not A Cle"-~ elo~r-2- I.P~ -'J)eo l<r~As. 00 BB -to 125 p~ ~ s,·~~ ~- ""'"'r .._ pq:.f1tl. ~ o?Z- oqo 1 da.;lu\ ?;pf. ?, l'i'\2-

H. REMOVER/CLEANER INFORMATION

~,ar_,...)' K I).t~r7.., £ errlover Name {print)

I. INSPECTOR INFORMATION

Inspector Name (print) Inspector Signature Inspector Certification No.

FDID # For Location Where Inspection Performed Inspector Telephone Number Date Signed

SAFETY AND BUILDINGS

r

fll


DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES

Carroll D. Besadny Secretary

September 4, 1992

b Southeast District

nf2c~~~ '€02300 N. Dr.Ma~:st~~;clG~! Jl~4~~· H;;: J V! Milwaukee, Wisconsin S3212

Telephone: 414-263-8500 S[p Telefax: 414-263-8483

Michael Birschbach

- 9 1992 PRof:

ScAV!CE 7;groNAL UsrAI!2s

Professional Service Industries, Inc. 2050 South Calhoun Road New Berlin, WI 53151

Dear Mr. Birschbach:

RE: Form 4400-149 - Application To Treat or Dispose of Petroleum Contaminated Soil

Enclosed is a signed copy of your submitted Form 4400-149. Both myself and Michael Griffin of Air Management have checked the calculations and checked for the appropriate analytes in the analytical laboratory soil sample analysis.

Sincerely,

~~~ \_.~~~--Candice L. Lindstrom Hydro geologist

I

I

I L

iiii

I

PAYNE & DOLAN, INC.

December 10, 1992

Mr. Michael Birschbach Professional Service Industries, Inc. 2050 South Calhoun Road New Berlin, WI 53151


The enclosed D.N.R. 4400 Tracking Form has been forwarded to the Southeast D.N.R. LUST Specialist.

If you have any questions, please call me at 414-524-1728.

Very truly yours,

PAYNE & DOLAN, INC.

_k//V-{_ Gl ~v Renee Y. Jlhrer

RYB: ehm/ R9-000IO.Itr

Enclosure

S3181SnGNI 301A83S lVNOISS3::108d

G66l V l 830

C3J\1303H

ASPHALT PRODUCERS AND CONTRACTORS SINCE 1930

Post Office Box 781 NJ W23650 Badinger Road Waukesha, WI 53187 Phone: (414) 524-1700 Fax: (414)524-1845

An Equal Opportunity Employer Post Office Box 351 801 Clark Drive Gladstone, Ml 49~37 Phone: (906) 428-:008 Fax: (906) 428-2?23

APPUCATION TO TREAT OR DISPOSE OF PETROLEUM CONTAMINATED SOIL ASPHALT PLANT OR OTHER TYPE OF THERMAL TREATMENT UNIT

' Form 4400-149

This form is required 't:Jy the Department of Natural Resour~ for lealdng underground storage tank sites to ensure that petroleum contaminated soil i3 treated or disposed o;f in compliance with NR 500-540, NR 158, and NR ·H9, Wis. Adm. Code. Failure to comply with applicable statutes and administrative rules may lead to violations of subchapter3 III and IV of ch. 144 Wis. Stats. and may result in forfeitures of not less than SlO or more than S25,000 for each violation, pursuant toss. 144.426(1), 144.74 {1), and 144.99, WIS. Stats., or tines of not less than SlOO or more than S150,000 or imprisonment for not more than 10 years, or both, pursuant to s. 144.74 (2), Wis. Stats. Each day of a continuing violation constitutes a separate violation. Department approval of this form is required prior to site remediation, except for soils to be buried in landfills.

DIRECTIONS: 1) Complete parts I and II. 2) Submit the application to the DNR project manager for approval. 3) Have the treatment facility complete part III of the approved form after the soil has been treated. 4) Return the ORIGINAL form to the DNR project manager. 5) Keep a copy for your files.

AIL SITES MUST COMPLETE PART L Part L Source of Soil

Site/Facility Name

Wisc:.~~sin Bell_ ;B.illing Center

Site Address 845 North 35th Street

City, State, Zip Code

Milw.CJ.uk~e, WI_ 53208

The information on this form is accurate to the best of my knowledge. Si of G0u:ra:or

~,.. f J-Jc ~-~<J I .~. ,.-.. ·•

Consulting~FiJ711 Contact

Site I.D. # (for DNR use only)

Contact Name

Jeff Haas

1/4, 1/4, Section, Township, and Range

SE of NH, Sec 25, ';r7N, R21E

TdepJu:me NumiJer (include area code)

(414)523-1774

Professional Service Industries, Inc. Michael Birschbach

Telephone Number

(414)782-1600

Estimated Volume Contaminated Soil

115 /~~

~cubic yardsJ(circ!e one) -~ ...

Type of Petroleum Contamination (Circle):

.· ~ 'Diesel FueV#2 Fuel Oil

Other

Contaminant concentration:

Soil Type (USCS) _sand (SP, SW) _silty/clayey sands (SM, SC) _silt (ML. MH, OL) _clay (Cl, CH, OH) _!_gravel (GC, GM, GP, GVV) _peat (PT)

Distance to Nearest Residence/Business 20'

j

One screened sample for each 15 yds3 and one laboratory analysis for e2ch 300 ydsl of contamioated soil when the fie!d instrument registers contamination OR one laboratcry analysis for each 100 yds3 whee the field instrument does not register contamination en soil shown to be contaminated during the site investigation/excavation or stockpiling. PLEASE ATTACH A TABLE USTING RESULTS OF BOTII FJELD SCREENDfG AND LAB ANALYSES, AND INCLUDE SUPPORTING I.AB REPORTS, IN ADDITION TO TIIE TPH AND BENZENE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW. NOTE: DILHR requires a minimum of 3 laboratory samples on excavated soil for PECFA claims.

Total Benzene in soil to be remediared (attach calculations) r-' _____ lbs

Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons(TPH) in soil to be remediated (attach calculations) 44.4 lbs

Total TPH as DRO -------------------

Rev. 5-91

l

r-

r 1

r1

·I

I

ATTACH EMISSIONS CALCULATIONS

(a/1,000,000) x (2,800 lbsiyd3) x b = benzene emission in lbs., where a = benzene concentration of soil sample in ppm or mg,1:g drY weight basis, and b = amount of contaminated soil in yds3• NOTE: This calculation can also be used to estimate TPH emissions by substituting TPH concentration (ppm or mgri:g) for "a". It may also be used to calculate VOCs. ·

Part II: Prop:lSCd Trear.m.ent Facility

Name of Plant Payne & Dolan

Contact Renee Bohren

Address. .. -~~9 -~899.7 Hillside_ F.oad, Susses, WL 53089 .. (or location of portable plant)

Plant number and Model Control /14 40 I Biturna Store

DNR Facility I.D. No. 268185610

Distance to Nearest Residence/Business. 1/4 mile

LEA.VE BlANK- DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES USE ONLY •......•.••.....•.•...................................•.•.......•...•••...•.••..............................•.......

Application Concurrence:

.Air Management <"?~-G-<......\ '

Project Manager ···.:...· _·_·'.:..' ..;.;'''-'·-'·'·_.._._ __ \-'-'--'-~·''"'-i.:.:.·~_,;-=-~::o..\:.-\::..·..:..·.:...' _·. -------\'', -. I C\ :"'.

Date _' . .;...\ ..,....-·~-=-~_,!__,-:___:.;·:._=------

Comments:

TillS SECITON TO BE COMl'LET.ED BY THE ASPHALT/TIIER.."\!AL UNIT PROCESSING TI!E CONTAMINATED SOIL AFTER PROCESSING IS COMPLETED

---------------------------------Panni

WDNR Air Pollution Control Permit. Number cf(o-DA /l- (JO Actual Volume of Soil Treated (tons/cubic yards) 55, /5" 7

Date of transport to plantff! . /0-27- 9 Z Date of treatment //- Z3- 9z Transporter Name /(e_~eLt/ed {[t (Jf Ml F O. B. Transporter u~n.se Number

Circle One: (!casted and Incorporate0 Roasted Only

Total Benzene emissions in pounds for this batch (apply 50% destruction factor if no after burner is used) o. oozB f..hs

Benzene emissions to eate for this plant (including this batch) for this calenear year: /4.7999 Lbs

Signaturr: o{ Treatment plant rt:prcsentative Telephone Number at Plant. {4/4) 24fc- 4.-Zt.a 'J.

COMPLETE ONLY FOR SOILS NOT INCORPORATED!

(One representati"1e sample for each 100 cubic yards-not composites)

Sample Number

TPH

DNR APPROVAL IS REQUIRED BEFORE USING AS COMMON FILL

Date of backfilling cr use as commcn :111 Location cf fill site __ 1/4 1/4 __ s __ T_R

! I ·'


PSI - Milwaukee Project: Wlsc!nson Bell Billing Center


ANALYTICAL REPORT

) fS-2o- 92

Date

59323020-217 40 August 20, 1992

4820 W. 15th Street • Lawrence, KS 66049..{)307 • Phone: 912/7L.9-2381 • Fax: 913/865-3544

.P"rofessional Service In ustnes 4820 West 15th Street, Lawrence, Kansas 66049

PSI - Milwaukee j 59323020-21740 ProJect: Wlscfnson Bell Billing Center ~ August20, 1992


634092 WC-1 Benzene <50 50 ugjkg 8020

Toluene <50 50 ugjkg 8020 ;;; Ethyl benzene <50 50 ugjl<g 8020 -

Xylenes 67 50 ugjkg 8020

TPH - Extractable 3550/8015

Diesel Range

i"l Organics 138 3 mgjl<g WI SW-141

PCB'S

AR 1221 <22 22 ugjkg 8080

AR 1232 <22 22 ugjkg 8080 ,- AR 1242/1016 <22 22 ugjkg 8080

AR 1248 <22 22 ugjl<g 8080

AR 1254 <22 22 ugjl<g 8080

AR 1260 <22 22 ugjkg 8080

Corrosivity p P or F 9045

Open Cup

Flashpoint >245 75 oF ASTM D92

I pH 9.49 0.01 UNITS 9045

Reactivity, Cyanide: 9010

Specific rate

~~ of Release <0.0003 0.0003 mgjl<g sec

Total Available <0.5 0.5 mgjkg

Reactivity, Sulfide 9030

Specific rate

of Release <0.0003 0.0003 mgjkg sec


TCLP Metals

Arsenic <0.04 0.04 mg/L 6010

Barium 0.578 0.001 mgjL 6010

Cadmium <0.002 0.002 mg/L 6010

Chromium <0.002 0.002 mg/L 6010

Lead <0.03 0.03 mgjL 6010

Mercury <0.0002 0.0002 mgjL 7471

Selenium <0.035 0.035 mg/L 6010

Silver <0.003 0.003 mgjL 6010

P - pH = 2.0 to 12.0

F- pH= <2.0 or >12.0

illll I II

CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD ()(A \ Jrn \ ~ Professional Service Industries Inc '

PROJECT NAME REPORT TO INVOICE TO

Ui5,(2Jj ~ 0u,k ~ sr NtLlNA~ta LABORATORY SUBMITTED TO: PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT MANAGER ADDRESS

_Mitbfd 6~YS(Lbac~ 0 6913 Hwy. 225 0 4820 W. 15th Street

Deer Park, TX 77536 Lawrence, KS 66049

P.O. NUMBER ADDRESS

coJJ\Q(J..LA CITY I STATE I ZIP (713) 479-8307 {800) 548-7901

ZR;c;b 5 0 6056 Ulmerton Road 0 850 Poplar Street

REQUIRED DUE DATE CITY I STATE/ ZIP ATIENT!ON Clearwater, FL 34620 Pittsburgh, PA 15220

{813) 531-1446 (412) 922-4000

SAMPLES TO LAB VIA TELEPHONE TELEPHONE

FAX

NUt..mER OF COOLERS REPORT VIA VERBAL FAX ·,l:. '~. ... LABORATORY USE ONLY ito

U.S. MAIUOVERNIGHT . ANALYTICAL DUE DATE ~;_\~-q-::l

,,;j:::: :~,.;m:AaoRAToRY use oNt:.v:i;;; ~;-,-:d-; :·i REPORT DUE DATE: I 'R ... ~()~'1~ TRANSFER RELINQUISHED BY ACCEPTED BY SEAL

:~)~]1*-~1;};r~:·.-;J:~!-~t:!.{tl~~-;~:~,!~l-~;1;tr·;;irt-'; -': !N0f1GANIC · ... •·. · 'ORGANIC

NUMBER •"fit- A1 L DATE/TIME NUMBER ;·:5~~r:; ... ·' ; . ' :. \~· .. . . .: . '

~ Q Row '· ·. ·Sect Row

-:PSI PROJECT NAME t' S "J: - /A.', \ -fUM-~ lt (C{ Ftrl ex-- 6'(s- ~?-~If~\~-~(,:·::: ..• :/;:-,;.:.':;<:;' •:._';.:' ," v.) 0..\J '.c. e.~

~PSI PROJECT # 5 C\ 4 /) ~ 0 .:) 0 YIN''$······:··-· ............ :.-.· ........ •-:~-. '' '~

Uvw, K(:f?k r, --!r '1 R . . ;;; ·~ ... '~.. :. ···.~ . '·:··. '•'. ·.·:·::<: ',",, 1 .·~ fl" PSI BATCH# ;;J _ t"\U. 0 (I) I ,CJ PARA~TER LIST I 0:: w z

.v/ ·7;( . .- •' •.: .. ,.LABORI\TORY USE ONLYI:l-ii;.i_~i:\·:i.il':'_.,::·/._,~:h'F:O;.-i;:i;;:;; · ... :·:: · .... •,· g !, ~ .:.· i'

SAC_LE cusro~!·, .. ;:~;:\···:::i\;:riHfi'~i~ DATE/~~~-,;~~;f:tW~h~;,·~~-Plif!.'8~::\:)E 1;.-::{j:~·;;,. ::::::: 0 0

-~ '.s·.- lt:.r\6 ·-•.:.,., .. , .... ~---· ·; .. _,.~··9Q·'····-·t\\"'l·--~······"· . .-, ........ "-,r-, .. ·· ·. ··: <t:·~~"..:;;; ... il: .. ·;:.· ·· · .. · :-_t :,.~.. . :.: ... :~·~_,;:,·;.c~·.-.-· .. :· . .~ ~·r .... < .. ·:·~.::,· 0 ~4;,

'i.Aa-use·~·-0::

SOIL-S w Dl

COM P-C WATEA.W '\:ONLY _.,;'f, :I: /~/~\ 1 U.a NUMB.ER', :::>

SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION DATE/TIME GRAB·B WASTE· X z Q"' -----------[-1 t~ -~fl:'l~ c, s ··:.·· .,t;•, \':·

"/ Y......-"'v '·"'\/ vv vv v U?:/f:''oqt):. iL _!/" v - - - --- -- - --_JJ .wu! · <if& ~/:a: 'B I Y}/~~3!. 3 v "v

lJ. wcJ/ ~/5 .~t:'5 r; q; ·~· ... :-tW v ... ~D~ . 3 J.l" --~!· ' ., i~J .... ,:.1 ...• ··•

_s_w~ o/~ -z;;to{:~ 'Q \i~ ~t&q'& -s v ,/J '•""

w~/ .ty~ ~ v•

rU1i4~L"' ·v £, ~?; :,ttit

~ v 0 ~~;~ ,~v.o t1f

\-J .e~·~- -~'? 1Y 3·. ?D(-? 1~ .-~ .. !;:;::!;~.:·~{·'.\''-~

ro9A-: (., ... :J v II

B[s }.,.lJ ···1·1' ~ .... ..; __ f;_:_~~f\!) 3::::0 _12_ ~ l! -~5~{)q~i ) v ··~;ejl··lt--J·:~~! ~~f; ;1.:,~;-,!~it};tJ~\ t~=~·~'\!.:,t'~': ;~ f·\ ~; 1'::«:,\tJ'~~---~i.Nt,: .~ ~~ l, ,, . ~ '• .

t--- 1--:-';tl'R~~fvt;:.w !11 LL ~J //

ADDITIONAL REMARI<S -- --· ~7JP&d!6rif . ·-··-----~---- SAMPLER'S SIGNATURE_ d._ __ f -

IIJJ ~ •

U.S. STANDARD SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES U.S. STANDARD SIEVE NUMBERS HYDROMETER

6 4 3 2 1''> 1 •. ·. \ 3 4 6 8 10 14 16 20 30 40 50 70 100 140 200 100

C:h lr 0

90 10

80 20

i\

70 30

60 40 t: ... \ a X iii

" ~ iii ~ 50 50 >-., >- "' ., w

"' II)

w ~ "' z <

;;: 40 60 0

... \ 0

z ... w z 0 "' 0

"' UJ 30 i\ 70 "' .. \

UJ

' 0..

\ 20

'\ 80

-(9. ,.... 10 -:;;:: 90

-t )-~ --- - ·---· -- -·- - - --- ---,-- - --0 100

500 100 50 10 5 1 0.5 0.1 0 05 001 0 005 0 001

GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS

I COBBLES I GRAVEL I SAND I SILT OR ClAY I I COARSE I FINE I COARSE I MEDIUM I FINE I Botlng No. Sample No. Elev. or Depth Clesslllcatlon Natw '!. ll Pl PI Project

Poorl v Graded Gravel WUlconsin Bell Bi 11 inQ Center With Sand (GP) 845 North 35th Street

Milwaukee WI

REPORT OF SOIL ANALYSIS FileNo.

052-24033

••••••--•••••• .. ••-c _ _. • .._._•-.-••••••••--·----·----------~· .. ·-·------·--••- ••••---• .

·sOIL MANIFEST • ...• :· ...

1. Generator's Name and Mailing Address: :nscc:-:sm BEL!.

m 7 n4300 RIVER ~IOQ!::> DRIVE HAU!<!::SHA, 'rli 53138

2. Generator's Telephone No: (j__ _1_ ~) 5 3 - 1 7 "1 J

Manifest

. ..:~

3. Contact Person: _J:_E_F_r_· _H_!v_!\_S ____________________ _

4. Addiess of Source of Generator's Material: 845 :1 3ST::I 31' r111HAUK£Et ~I 53201

5. Telephone No. at Source Material: ( ___ )- __ _

2727

6. Contact Person at Source of Material: -:-__ J_E...'-)';'-F_H_AA_'_S_--:----:---------------

7. Transporter's Name and Telephone No: -4 5 3-6 0 3 0 E&K HAZA1\DOUS HASTE SER.V!GSS ( _ll_ _1. ....!!__ ) --- ----

8. .-t-J ..-- ,.._

Transporter's Truck No: __ -_.... ..... ....__'-· ------------..,.-

9. Cr J.Sultant's Name and Telephone No: ( ___ )- __ _

10. Name and Location of Remediation Facility: PAYNE & DOLAN SUSSEX, WI

11. Description of material to be remediated and the contaminants including test results: D!.~SEl. CCNTAll!NAT;w SOIL

12. Quantity of material covered by this manifest=----------------------_.:··

13. GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION: I hereby declare that the contents of this consignment are fully and accurately described above and are in all respects in proper condition for transport by highway according to applicable governmental regulations.

Printed I Typed Name & Position Title Signature Date ! ... .-

14. TRANSPORTER acknowlegements of receipt of materials

Printed I Typed N arne & Position Title Signature Date ... ,· ··.'

. ~ • . ...........

15. FACILITY Please note any discrepancy between the material described on this MANIFEST and the material received at the facility.

16. FACILITY acknowledgements of receipt of materials

Printed i Typed Name & Position Title Signature Date : ...... !

~ . '\ · .. - ._-t__ ~ .. \\ ·.r -·, ... ,,, {)' .. -l n · ·: ...... e. (-A \ a. ·-~. ;" .. ,"':~ '. \.)! ,'1

WHITE - Office Copy GREEN - Sent to Generator _ _ __.,.,. ..._

CANARY- Transporter PIN"X- Facility Retain GOLDE~'KOD - Generator

--········ ... ···-··---·-·--·----···-·----SOIL MANIFEST 2733

Manifest

1. Generator's Name and Mailing Address:· 1 ......

!HSCONSI!l DELL

~n 7 1124300 R.!VERHOOD DRIVE, 'rlAUKESHA, ~:H 5313;)

2. Generator's Telephone No: (~ _1_ ~) _5 ___ 2 _3_ - _L _1_ _]_ __±_

3. Contact Person: __ J_EF_F_· _HAA __ \s __________________ _

4. Address of Source of Generator's Material: 845 ~l 35TH ST. ~1I!.WAu'""!GtE. HI 53201

5. Telephone No. at Source Material: ( ___ ) - __ _

6. Contact Person at Source of Material: -:--__ JE_r.._F_F_Hfl_~.A_u; ____ ~--------------·; '

7. Transporter's Name and Telephone No: b Et:K HAZARDOUS ~?ASTI: SER'l!GES ( __!!... _!_ _l!_ ) - !!..__ 2_ _§___ - __§__ _Q_ _)_ .JL

&"\ ") ~ I •\ / • 8. Transporter's Truck No: OJ(. /~/ .J.,'_:«{;

9. Cr rsultant's Name and Telephone No: ______ · _· · ____ ( _·- -- -- ) --- -

10. Name and Location of Remediation Facility: PAYHZ & DOLA:'l SUSSEX m:

11. Description of material to be remed.iated and the contaminants including test results: DIZSEL COI-ITA.'1I?~ATED SOU.

12. Quantity of material covered by this manifest:----------------------

13. GENERA TOR'S CERTIFICATION: I hereby declare that the contents of this consignment are fully and accurately described above and are in all respects in proper condition for transport by highway according to applicable governmental regulations.

14.

15.

16.

Printed I Typed Name & Position Title Signature Date .\ .

'

TRANSPORTER acknowlegements of receipt of materials

Printed I Typed Name & Position Title Signature .. - Date --.---;:; K I ;.•1 I~; . !I i I I~ ) jl ,.-<" ;>/ :r.-,r( ~r,.--- .nc- I f . <(" 1~' //Jl)7/'7?

' ,r ·../ .. I ... ·- ~ .. , -· /

FACILITY Please note any discrepancy between the material described on this MANIFEST atct the material received at the facility.

FACILITY acknowledgements of receipt or materials

Printed i Typed Name & Position Title Signature Date

, ;,· .. ,~ .. --.1 • Cf~' •• •J '~

I .·· .. ' ( r b., .. , .... _, ,; _L( -r-;;:J \ \ 1'"Y' 0 n f\ ·

--~:, 0 (... ·,Q - ..........

( ·-.,;~·, .f : ·. {.) ~~-,~i <··~ \ !!."'\ i ·~ • ;!·'

WHI'TE - Office Copy GREEN - Sent to Generator CANARY- Transporter PI~K -Facility Retain GOLDEl'-"ROD - Generator

r·

SOIL MANIFEST ~~f~-, l""- 2730

Manifest

1. Generator's Name and Mailing Address: !HSCONSIN DELL .. .

~n 7 !,.f24300 RIVER WOOD DRI'lS HAUKESHA, HI 531SH

2. Generator's Telephone No: ( __!!___ _..!__ ..!!__) _s_ 2 _1_ - _1 _ _]_ _7_ ~

3. Contact Person: __ J_r.__t;' __ F_'_I:L ..... ~--~-s ___________________ _

4. Address of Source of Generator's Material: :J!•S !l JS!ll 5T. :-l!L~1AU1~F..£:, HI 53201

5. Telephone No. at Source Material: ( ___ ) ----

6. Contact Person at Source of Material: :...· _J_E_F ._r._ru_·_:\A_' s __ ·_· ·___: .. _··-·----'1--..,.....,c--------------

7. Transporter's Name and Telephone No: ( ) , - 3 _,;. _Q_ _.,J _!l_ ES~ HAZARDOUS H.t\STE SER"w'"lCf::S ...!L _1 _ _A_ __:!... 2._ _ v

8. Transporter's Truck No: -=E:_ . ..:..;(_\_0_\---'----~-~-----9. Cr 1sultant's Name and Telephone No:

( __ .· _)- __ _ 10. N arne and Location of Remediation Facility:

:W£tlS .:2 DOLAn SUSSSX, tli

11. Description of material to be remediated and the contaminants including test results: D!~SEL CONT&H:iAT:ED SOIL

12. Quantity of material covered by this manifest=------------.....,..---------


Printed I Typed Name & Position Title Signature Date

.·• ' .

14. TRANSPORTER acknowlegements of receipt of materials

Printed I Typed N arne & Position Title Signatl,Ire Date

if- ' • I If/. :--,...-///1 i 1r/; .t::..- /:' /I~ I _;,-f': ~;. :-;%-d-~;tL. /cJ -_./· -;. r:. 15. FACILITY Please note any discrepancy between the material described on this MANIFEST and the

material received at the facility.

16. FACILITY acknowledgements of receipt or materials

Printed i Typed Name & Position Title Signature Date \ i~ r·( c::: (' .... ,- ¥-. ; \ . : ,-..

h()\.! \ c..-- 1 -- ,_ ,., r n (\ \.o ( . ";"; ... ~\·/ / .•"'.•'';1f.":t.-". ""\ /( ~~ ~~- '! -) \ (~"" \I: .t~ Jt ... . ......... ,.

· WHITE - Office Copy GREEN - Sent to Generator CANARY- Transp<lrter Plr-."K. - FacilitV'Retain GOLDE?-.'ROD - Generator

·-f

f --

r-

I

r

r fl

SOIL MANIFEST 2732 Manifest

.....

1.- - Generator's Name and Mailing Address: WISGO!'lSIN BELL Nl7 U24301) :.l!VERHOCD muvz, tMlJKESlL\, ;n 53133

2. Generator's Telephone No: ( ~ _1_ .__!:__) - _5_ 2 _J_ _l _ _!_ _!_ _!:_

3. Contact Person: ___ .. _rn_F_F_I_~_I\_S _________________ _

4. Address of Source of Generator's Material: 345 ~ 35'r'd ~)T. SJZOl

5. Telephone No. at Source Material: ( ___ ) - __ _

6. Contact Person at Source of Material: __ ._-_.,._. ____ .J_.E_IT_l_L~_!_,.s __ .,--___________ _

7. Transporter's Name and Telephone No: 2&X HAZARDOUS ~-TASTE SERVICES ( ~ _1_ ~) _ 4 5 B 6 0 3 0

8. Transporter's Truck No:-------·-------

9. Cr J.Sultant's Name and Telephone No: ( ___ )~ __ _

10. Name and Location of Remediation Facility: PA'fllE 1l f':'OL.:'\1~ 3U3SEX, WJ:

11. Description of material to be remediated and the contaminants including test results: DIESEL CO~fTJ~~InATED SOIL

12. Quantity of material covered by this manifest:-------~--------------


Printed I Typed Name & Position Title Signature Date

.. . '- ., J,• ..

14.' TRANSPORTER acknowlegements of receipt of materials

Printed I Typed Name & Position Title Signature Date . .. . ,·· . ,, ··--·,--.-_:.·

15. FACILITY Please note any discrepancy between the material described on this MANIFEST and the material received at the facility.

16. FACILITY acknowledgements of receipt or materials

Printed j Typed N arne & Position Title ,, Signature Date

!--c~ \_. 1\ _c r r· v / ' )1: r..,._.::k ··/ i0-~7-(/~ ~-........ _(\ '·--t · ·'ti '·. 1-/ i"r\"~t '-· -r r ..... ·-i\l'. \--'\" f'Y, (~ :"\ , . .., . -· --\ . .1 • ,, ...., ·' .4 I ; -- "£./'

WHITE - Office Copy GREEN - Sent to Generator CANARY- Transporter PINK -Facility Retain GOLDE~'ROD - Generator

\ ' I L

l

r Ill

Ill

1111

state of Wisconsin

RECEIVED

carroll o. Besacny, Secretary Box 12436

Milwauk~1 ~isconsin 53212 TELEFM NO. 414·263·8483

August 28, 1992 File Fef: 26DO-Cotnty: Milwaukee

Mr. Jeffrey Haas Wisconsin Bell N17 W24300 Riverwood Drive Waukesha, WI 53188

Dear Mr. Haas:

SEP 2 1992

PROFESSIONAL . SERVICE INDUSTRIES

RE: Wisconsin Bell Facility - 845 N. 35th street, Milwaukee, WI

ER·LUST

Wisconsin Departrrent of Natural Resources (WDNR) has l:een notified that petroleum contamination was discovered August 5, 1992 at the above referenced location. Based on the site specific information provided, this case has l:een assigned to the I£M Priority Rank group. 'Ihe purpose of this letter is to infonn you of your legal responsibilities to address this situation.

Releases from undergroun::i storage tanks regulated under SUbtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act require compliance with the provisions of 40 CFR Parts 280 and 281. 'Ihe Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has the authority to take enforcement action at any time, l::ut will generally not take action against parties cooperating with the state. 'Ihe WDNR proceeds in IlJSI' cases under the authority of s. 144.76, Wisconsin statutes, commonly referred to as Wisconsin's Hazardous SUbstance Spill Law. 'Ihe definition of "hazardous substance" as found in s. 144. 01 ( 4m) , Wisconsin statutes, includes petroleum products.

Wisconsin statute 144. 76(2a) states: "A person who possesses or controls a hazardous substance which is discharged or who causes the discharge of a hazardous substance shall notify the Deparbnent i.nunediately of any discharge not exerrpted under sub. (9) . "

Wisconsin statute 144. 76(3) states: "A person who possesses or controls a hazardous substance which is discharged or who causes the discharge of a hazardous substance shall take the actions necessary to restore the environment to the extent practicable and minimize the hannful effects from the discharge to the air, lands, or waters of this state."

Because you possess or control a hazardous substance which has l:::een released to the environit¥;mt, the Deparbnent identifies you as the party responsible for taking the actions necessary to restore the environment. You are required to:

1. Immediately notify the WDNR Spills Hotline at (414) 263-8491 should emergency conditions involving explosive vapors ard.jor well contamination develop.

2. CO:rrluct an investigation to determine the extent of soil and grol.l11&·mter contamination.

~ 3. Relrediate all of the envirornnental impacts caused by this situation.

4. Sample private water supply wells which may have l:een inlpacted by the release.

'Ihe Department suggests that you have a qualified environmental engineer or hydr~eol~ist direct the rerre:lial investigation, assess the envirornnental impact, an::i coordinate the impleroontation of a cleanup program. Within 30 days of receivin:J this letter, you should provide the WDNR with the following infonnation:

1. '!he narre of the in:lividualjfinn directing the investigation.

2. '!he date the remedial investigation will l:::egin.

'!he Department requires that the location of the tank arrlfor release be sul:xnitted with the work plan. Requirements for location are Iatitude, Longitude, 1/4, 1/4, ToWnship, and Range (east or west).

Final d0Cl.llrel1tation of the investigation and cleanup should be prepared according to the guidance enclosed arrl sent to this office on completion of compliance with all applicable federal, state arrl local laws arrl regulations. Remedial actions must adequately cleanup contaminated soil arrlfor groundwater to current WDNR guidelines andfor standards. All product, soil, wastewater, and sludge must be disposed of in compliance with all applicable federal, state· and local laws and regulations. Because the Deparbnent is experiencing a backlog of leaking urrlergrourrl storage tank cases of emergency status and your case is not currently ranked as an emergency, your sul::xnittals will be reviewed as time pennits. Investigation and cleanup should not, however, be delayed pending WDNR review of your case.

'!he WDNR requests that concise wsr project up:lates l:e sul::xnitted every six months for all low priority sites; biannual up:lates will enable WDNR project managers to m:Jnitor the status of rena:iial investigations and/or corrective actions on projects which are not under direct WDNR oversight.

You are encouraged to contact the Deparbnent of Industry, Labor, and Human Relations (DII.HR) , the state agency that administers the Petroleum Environmental Cleanup F\.rrrl (PECFA). '!his fund may reiml:::urse you for eligible costs associated with the remedial investigation arrl cleanup. DII.HR should be contacted at (608} 267-4545 to obtain current infonnation regarding the PECFA program.

Please be aware that your ability to utilize PECFA funds will be dependent on your cooperation in adequately addressing this problem.

Giselle Red Program Assistant, Environmental Repair Section

Enclosures: Remedial Investigation Olecklist Application to Treat or Dispose of Petroleum Contaminated Soil

c: Michael Birschback. - P.S.I. SED case File

RE: Wisconsin Bell Facility - 845 N. 35th Street, Milwaukee,

TiEC~EIVi:u' Giselle Red P.O. Box 12436 Milwaukee, WI 53212

Giselle Red,

OCT C ;? 1992

t:' r;= .... ~ .. ~. ·~-

Wisconsin Bell has hire Professional Service Industries, Inc. (PSI) to do the investigation at this location. The investigation began on September 16, 1992.

Should you have any questions please call me on 523-1774.

~~ ~-~Crl'-7 Jeffer.P A. Haas Manager - Environmental Protection

State of Wisconsin\ DEPARTMENT-OF NATURAL RESOURCES

Carroll D. Besadny Secretary

September 4, 1992

Michael Birschbach Professional Service Industries, Inc. 2050 South Calhoun Road New Berlin, WI 53151


Southeast District 2300 N. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Dr.

Post Office Box 12436 Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53212

Telephone: 414-263-8500 Telefax: 414-263-8483

RE: Form 4400-149 - . Application To Treat or Dispose of Petroleum Contaminated Soil

Enclosed is a signed copy of your submitted Form 4400-149. Both myself and Michael Griffin of Air Management have checked the calculations and checked for the appropriate analytes in the analytical laboratory soil sample analysis.

Sincerely,

~~~Uj \_.~~~~~ Candice L. Lindstrom Hydrogeologist

l ~ ...

APPUCATION TO TREAT OR DISPOSE OF PETROLEUM CONTAMINA'IED SOIT.. ASPHALT PLANT OR OTHER TYPE OF TIIERMAL TREA~NT UNIT

· Form 4400-149

This form is required by the Department of Natural Resources for lealciog underground storage tank sites to ensure that petroleum contaminated soil is treated or disposed o;f in compliance with NR 500-540, NR 158, and NR 419, Wis. Adm. Code. Failure to comply with applicable statutes and administrative rules may lead to violations of subchapters ill and IV of ch. 144 Wis. Stats. and may result in forfeitures of not less than S10 or more than S25,000 for each violation, pursuant to ss. 144.426(1), 144.74 (1), and 144.99, Wis. Stats., or fines of not less than SlOO or more than $150,000 or imprisonment for not more than 10 years, or both, pursuant to s. 144.74 (2), Wis. Stats. Each day of a continuing violation constitutes a separate violation. Department approval oJ this form is required prior to site remediation, except for soils to be buried in landfills.

DIRECTIONS: 1) Complete parts I and II. 2) Submit the application to the DNR project manager for approval. 3) Have the treatment facility complete part III of the approved form after the soil has been treated. 4) Return the ORIGINAL form to the DNR project manager. 5) Keep a copy for your files.

AU. SITES MUST COMPLETE PART L Part I. Source of Soil

Site/Facility Name

Wisc.()~sin Bell ~illing ~en~er

Site Address 845 North 35th Street

City, State, Zip Code

.. MilwatJl<~e, ¥1.. 53208

The information on this form is accurate to the best of my knowledge. ~ ~ ~-~~

Contact

Site J.D. # {for DNR use only)

Contact Name Jeff Haas

1/4, 1/4, Section, Township, and Range

SE of NH, Sec 25, T7N, R21E

Telephone Number (include area code)

(414)523-1774

Telephone Number

Professional Service Industries, Inc. Michael Birschbach (414)782-1600

Estimated Volume Contaminated Soil

115 ~(circle one)

Type of Petroleum Contamination (Circle):

~~ Other

Contaminant concentration:

Soil Type (USCS) _sand (SP, SW) _silty/clayey sands (SM, SC) _silt (ML, MH, OL) _clay (Cl, CH, OH) ~ravel (GC, GM, GP, GW) _peat (P1)

Distance to Nearest Residence/Business 20'

One screened sample for each 15 yds3 and one laboratory analysis for each 300 yds3 of contaminated soil when the field instrument registers contamination OR one laboratory analysis for each 100 yds3 when the field instrument. does not register contamination on soil shown to be contaminated during the site investigation/excavation or stockpiling. PLEASE ATTACH A TABLE USTING RESULTS OF BOTII FIELD SCREENING AND LAB ANALYSES, AND INCLUDE SUPPORTING LAB REPORTS, IN ADDIDON TO TilE TPH AND BENZENE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW. NOTE: DILHR requires a minimum of 3 laboratory samples on excavated soil for PECFA claims.

· Total Benzene in soil to be remediated (attach calculations) __ ./'"""' ___ lbs

Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons(TPH) in soil to be remediated (attach calculations) 44.4 lbs

Total TPH as .....:;D~RO;;_ ______ _

Rev. 5-91

ATIACH EMISSIONS CALCULATIONS

(a/1,000,000) x (2,800 lbslyd3) x b = benzene emission in lbs., where a = benzene concentration of soil sample in ppm or mg/kg dry~ weight basis, and b = amount of contaminated soil in yds3• NOTE: This calculation can also be used to estimate TPH emissions by substituting TPH concentration (ppm or mg/kg) for "a". It may also be used to calculate VOCs.

Part II: Proposed Treatment Facility

Name of Plant Payne & Dolan

Contact Renee Bohren

Address .. ~50N899.711il~side R.oad , Sl,lSses, WI 53089 (or location of portable plant)

Plant number and Model Control 114 40 I Bituna Store

DNR Facility I.D. No. 268 1856 10

Distance to Nearest Residence/Business 1/4 mile

LEAVE BlANK- DEPARTMENT OF NATIJRAL RESOURCES USE ONLY ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

Application Concurrence: .,..-,. "'n 0 }f:O t ,

Air Management ' ~ ~-\---

(~ ' \ . Project Manager ·""- \\ t\ \. ~ \' d '\ , ~l>c\ ~\. C)ID

Date qp/-;L Date ~ I -~ I c\ '}_

Comments:

TillS SECIION 1U BE COMPLETED BY Tiffi ASPHALT/IHERMAL UNIT PROCESSING Tiffi CONTAMINATED SOIL AFTER PROCESSING IS COMPLETED

-------------------------------------------Partlli

WDNR Air Pollution Control Permit Number Actual Volume of Soil Treated (tons/cubic yards)

Date of transport to plant .. Date of treatment.

Transporter Name Transporter License Number

Circle One: Roasted and Incorporated Roasted Only

Total Benzene emissions in pounds for this batch (apply 50% destruction factor if no after burner is used)

Benzene emissions to date for this plant (including this batch) for this calendar year ..

Sign,atur'e of Treatment plant representative Telephone Number at Plant .

POST BURN SAMPLE RESULTS: COMPLETE ONLY FOR SOILS NOT INCORPORATED!

(One representative sample for each 100 cubic yards-not composites)

Sample Number

TPH

DNR APPROVAL IS REQUIRED BEFORE USING AS COMMON FILL

Date of backfilling or use as common fill Location of fill site ___ 1/4 __ 1/4 __ s __ T __ R

r.w;;J '~


ANALYTICAL REPORT

PSI - Milwaukee Project: Wlsclnson Bell Billing Center


Date

59323020-217 40 August 20, 1992

4820 W. 15th Street • Lawrence, KS 66049-0307 • Phone: 913/749-2381 • Fax: 913/865-9544

.P'rofessional Service Industries 4C-20 West 15th Street, Lawrence, Kansas 66049

PSI - Milwaukee _,J 59323020-21740 . Project: Wlsclnson Bell BOling Center August 20, 1992


634092WC-1 Benzene <50 50 ugjkg 8020

Toluene <50 50 ugjkg 8020

Ethylbenzene <50 50 ugjkg 8020

Xylenes 67 50 ugjkg 8020

TPH • Extractable 3550/8015

Diesel Range

Organics 138 3 mgjkg WI SW-141

PCB'S

AR 1221 <22 22 ugjkg 8080

AR 1232 <22 22 ugjkg 8080

AR 1242/1016 <22 22 ugfkg 8080

AR 1248 <22 22 ugjkg 8080

AR 1254 <22 22 ugjkg 8080

AR 1260 <22 22 ugjkg 8080

Corrosivity p PerF 9045

Open Cup

Aashpolnt >245 75 oF ASTM 092

pH 9.49 0.01 UNITS 9045

Reactivity, Cyanide: 9010

Specific rate

of Release <0.0003 0.0003 mgjkg sec


Reactivity, Sulfide 9030

Specific rate

of Release <0.0003 0.0003 mgjkgsec


TCLP Metals

Arsenic <0.04 0.04 mg/L · 6010

Barium 0.578 0.001 mg/L 6010

Cadmium <0.002 0.002 mg/L 6010

Chromium <0.002 0.002 mg/L 6010

Lead <0.03 0.03 mgjL 6010

Mercury <0.0002 0.0002 mg/L 7471

Selenium <0.035 0.035 mg/L 6010

Silver <0.003 0.003 mg/L 6010

P- pH= 2.0 to 12.0

F- pH= <2.0 or >12.0

CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD PROJECT NAME I REPORT TO INVOICE TO

~U~i~L.._Q{.tj 6tJ11LL.....:A'Ko,Ll.,·llu""~-4~ (l",.fL..~~_:..b:~li:t-l-:t2,.L~_..:r:-PS2.!.1-::::__jM~i L~w'Y.!.tf~CA~ta---------1 LABoRAToRv suBMITTED To:

PROJECT NUMBER

1 ;A;;;: ~1G6t'fS{~bt<.{~ ADDRESS Q ~9e~~ ~:·. ~ n536

P.O. NUMBER ADDRESS f CITY I STATE/ZIP (713) 479-8307

l------------t-.=.o2e>...__,·0""-= __ 5_...;:C;_;A1_.....· i.::.''WJ ......... ~=UA"-'---t-------------1 Q 6056 Ulmerton Road REQUIRED DUE DATE

SAMPLES TO LAB VIA

CITY I STATE I ZIP ATIENTION Clearwater, Fl 34620 (813) 531-1446

TELEPHONE

FAX

TELEPHONE

Q 4820 W. 15th Street

Lawrence, KS 66049 (800) 548-7901

Q 850 Poplar Street

Pittsburgh, PA 15220 (412) 922-4000

NUMBER OF COOLERS REPORT VIA VERBAL FAX ,;r. ~:~; ~·, · ,, , . LABORATORY USE ONLY :.

U.S. MAIUOVERNIGHT ANALYTICAL DUE DATE I~.;_\~~ q -=.1 .. ; ; . . : ':. : i ' .•.

TRANSFER RELINQUISHED BY ACCEPTED BY

PSIA-60Q.10(1)

state of Wisconsin \ DEPARIMENl' OF NM'URAL RESOORCES Carroll D. Besachy, Secretary

Box 12436 Milwauk~1 ~isconsin 53212

TELEF~ NO. 414-263-8483

August 28, 1992 File Fef: 26Co COlnty: Milwaukee

Mr. Jeffrey Haas Wisconsin Bell N17 W24300 Ri verwood Drive Waukesha, WI 53188

Dear Mr. Haas:

RE: Wisconsin Bell Facility - 845 N. 35th street, Milwaukee, WI

ER-LUST

Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) has been notified that petroleum contamination was discovered August 5, 1992 at the above referenced lcx:::ation. Based on the site specific informa.tion provided, this case has been assigned to the lJ::M Priority Rank group. '!he purpose of this letter is to infonn you of your legal respOnsibilities to address this situation.

Releases from underground storage tanks regulated under SUbtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act require compliance with the provisions of 40 CFR Parts 280 and 281. The Envirornnental Protection Agency {EPA) has the authority to take enforcement action at any time, but will generally not take action against parties cooperating with the state. The WDNR proceeds in rusr cases under the authority of s. 144.76, Wisconsin statutes, co:rmnonly referred to as Wisconsin's Hazardous SUbstance Spill Law. '!he definition of "hazardous sul:stance" as found in s. 144. 01 ( 4m) , Wisconsin statutes, includes petroleum products.

Wisconsin statute 144. 76{2a) states: "A person who possesses or controls a hazardous substance which is discharged or who causes the discharge of a hazardous sul:stance shall notify the Department inunedi.ately of any discharge not exempted under sub. (9) . 11

Wisconsin statute 144. 76(3) states: "A person who possesses or controls a hazardous sul:stance which is discharged or who causes the discharge of a hazardous substance shall take the actions necessary to restore the envirornnent to the extent practicable and minimize the harmful effects from the discharge to the air, lands, or waters of this state."

Because you possess or control a hazardous sul:stance which has been released to the envirornnent, the Department identifies you as the party responsible for taking the actions necessary to restore the envirornnent. You are required to:

1. Inunediately notify the WDNR Spills Hotline at (414} 263-8491 should emergency conditions involving explosive vapors andjor well contamination develop.

2. Corrluct an investigation to detennine the extent of soil and groundwater contamination.

3. Remediate all of the enviromnental impacts caused by this situation.

4. Sample private water supply wells which may have been impacted by the release.

'!he Department suggests that you have a qualified enviromnental engineer or hydrogeologist direct the rerood.ial investigation, assess the envirornnental impact, and coordinate the implementation of a cleanup program. Within 30 days of receiving this letter, you should provide the WDNR with the following information:

1. 'Ihe :nane of the individual/firm directing the investigation.

2. 'Ihe date the remedial investigation will begin.

'!he Department requires that the location of the tank and/ or release be suJ:::mitted with the work plan. Requirements for location are Latitude, Longitude, 1/4, 1/4, ToWnship, and Range (east or west).

Final documentation of the investigation and cleanup should be prepared according to the guidance enclosed and sent to this office on completion of compliance with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. Remedial actions must adequately cleanup contaminated soil and/ or groundwater to current WDNR guidelines and/ or standards. All product, soil, wastewater, and sludge must be disposed of in compliance with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. Because the Depart::rnent is experiencing a backlog of leaking underground storage tank cases of emergency status and your case is not currently ranked as an emergency, your suJ:::mittals will be reviewed as time pennits. Investigation and cleanup should not, however, be delayed pending WDNR review of your case.

'!he WDNR requests that concise wsr project updates be submitted every six months for all low priority sites; biannual updates will enable WDNR project managers to nonitor the status of remedial investigations and/or corrective actions on projects which are not under direct WDNR oversight.

You are encouraged to contact the Depart::rnent of Industry, I..al::x:>r, and Human Relations (DTIRR) , the state agency that administers the Petroleum Enviromnental Cleanup F'Urrl (PECFA) . '!his fund may reimburse you for eligible costs associated with the remedial investigation and cleanup. DIIRR should be contacted at (608) 267-4545 to obtain current information regarding the PECFA program.

Please be aware that your ability to utilize PECFA funds will be dependent on your cooperation in adequately addressing this problem.

Giselle Red Program Assistant, Enviromnental Repair Section

Enclosures: Remedial Investigation Checklist Application to Treat or Dispose of Petroleum Contaminated Soil

c: Michael Birschback - P. S. I. SED case File

\ B:~Jl· .. /'" Acti~y Number: 03-41-002600

Activity Type: LUST

Activity Name: WISCONSIN BELL FACILITY

Bureau for Remediation and Redevelopment Activity Detail Report - Case Tracking

VPLE: 0 Gen Prop: 0

Region: Southeast Region County: Milwaukee

Location Name: AMERITECH C0112

Location Address: 845 N 35TH ST

FID: 241317670

EPA ID: WID981959315

Start Date: 08/05/ 1992

Municipality: MILWAUKEE Project Manager:

Legal Description: None Found

Latitude: None Found

Longitude: None Found

Co-Contamination: 0 Transferred DCom: 0 Tracked by DCom: 0

Who:

Contact Type: RESPONSIBLE PARTY

Name: S,.X.,. ~ }J&c_ ~<.R..~ Title:

Company: AMERITECH

Address: 2356 S !liTH ST

WAUKESHA, WI 53227

Impacts:

Soil Contamination

Groundwater Contamination

Co-contamination

Risk:

High Risk Assigned: 12/30/ 1999

Substances:

Fuel Oil

Actions:

Notification

99 Miscellaneous

CHANGE PRIORITY TO LOW

2 RP Letter Sent

33 Tank Closure/Site Assessment Report Received

TNK CLS/SA REPT RECV'D

37 SI Report Received (w/out Fee)

SI REPORT RECV'D

99 Miscellaneous/2

WIS. BELL A SWERS TO WDNR LETTER

43 Status Report Received

QRTL Y /MTHL Y STATUS RPT

99 Miscellaneous/3

ADDITIONAL WORK REQUIRED

76 Activity Transferred to DCOM

Monday, Sep 25, 2000 08: 17am

Priority: High

Score: 20.00

LUST Trust Eligible: NON-FEDERAL

Pecfa Eligible: 0 Pecfa 80k: 0

Pecfa 80k Failure: 0

Phone: ( ) -

Fax:

E-Mail:

Comment: FUEL OIL

08/05/ 1992

08/ 10/ 1992

08/27/1992

05/10/ 1993

09/20/ 1994

09/20/ 1994

10/06/ 1995

I 1/09/ 1995

09/25/2000

Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources

Ext:

REC EIVED

SEP 2 5 ZOOO ERS DIVISION MILWAUKEE

End Date: OPEN

Page I of I

LEAKI~G U~DERGROUND STORAGE TANK (Case Tracking) Form 4400-146 3-91

PMN: . FID: --------

ProjMgr: C£0JV/ d ,-~ L/ad si:t:tffVI · gal Municipality: -------....:.....-------

gal Desc: ~114 ~114 Sec:~ T ..::l.JJ_ R 2:.L_@W_

Date of Initial ContaCt: Date of Lett£r. .£..1 :J.2.. I~ . Date Site Closure Approved: __ I __ 1 __

Fundipg Source ___)C. 1= RP

2= LTF --3= EF .

~ Screeni:n == 4 = SF

PECFA Review Requested (v)_Yes_·_No .

Date PECF A Request Received (nunldd/yy) I ___ ----r-- 1 .. Hi~ -- s ,. Ncne

2 .. Medium __ 6 • Olher (Describe In Commenu) Lust Trust Eligible __ 7 = EPA (Emergency Resp) -- 1 • Federal

~0 Score: ./44. ~,fj/ J)Y:f6 (.J) ~ Apr.ropriale

_No Action Talcen (N)

~Emergency (E)

_ Emergency Response (R)

~eld Investigation (I)

__ Remedial Action (C)

Long Term Monitoring (L)

Date Initiated (rnm/dJJ/yy)

__ l __ l __ __ l __ l __

_1_ 1~1 q'd-__ , __ l __

I I

CASE STATUS · Date Completed

(mmlddlyy)

__I __ , __ __ l_._l __ __ l __ l __

__l __ l __

I

__ 2 • Non-Federal

Commenu

(v) All Appropriate Known Impacts (v) Substances (-4) __ LeadcdGas(l) __ VOCS(6)

Potential Impacts (v)

__ Fire/Explosion Threat (1) __ __ Contaminated Private Well (2) __

Contaminated Public Well (3) __ Groundwater Contamination (4) Soil Contamination (S) ~ Other: (6) -:::-

__Unleaded Gas (2) __ Pesticide (7) __Diesel (3) __,"!(_ Fuel Oil (4) ~,O(::C:) -~\ _ '_Unknown Hydroc:lrbons (S) __ . Other (8) -----:.-----------

Quantity Discharged

Address:

Telephone: ( '-/! y{ ) I 5 2;-3 - )'Tf /t.j (list additional on separate list and attach.)

Telephone:

01 = 02= 03= 04· OS= 06= 07=

lnf. Contact. Resp Initiated RP Leaer. Re$p Initiated NTC of Non Compliance W. Enf. Conf, Resp Initiated Follow-up Enf. Con!, Resp lnitated Inspection Letter Response Recei'led

08 = 09= 10= 11= 12 = 13 =

"14=

DATI:

Amount Commiaed: $, __ .....:... ___ _

~ount ·spent: s.___,.,...........,...-...,..---(list additional on separate list and attach.) ---

ENFORCEMENT ACTIO:o-i TAKEN

Adeq~ R~ 15,. Formal EnfConf 22• .DraftRefet~,j Progress Being Made 16 = £nf Con!. Leaer 23 • Referral to DOJ Defer Enforcement 17 "' Admin. Order Proposed · 24 • Referral to DA Close Out 18 • Admin. Oi'der Fual" 2S • Referral to EPA Rcoommend NFA 19 • Admin. Order Modified 26 • Continuing Violation FWD 10 Secondary Enf 20 = Admin. Order Cancelled 27 • Sec Next Violation Notice of Violation 21 • Contest Case HeMing 28 • Site Inspection

99 • Other A~tion: ---------------

COMMENT ACTION (code from above)

Dl ( n:un/dd/yy)

55': 1 tJ{; ,9;) gp;t_±)eSmtW-t-' Nb-2 D'2 ?[ I "d'] I q:J_

r Lt.:ST CASE PRIORITY SCREE~ING WORKSHEET

HIGH FACTORS: (DEFIN1Tl0N: Any.cue which pre~ts an ac~al threat~ human h~ltJ:l. or hu a high ~tential of causing a threat to human hc:tlth . and propeny; and/or any cal': which has c3Used or has a high potenaal of c:ausmg substantial IZTlpacts to the sod . waters and air of the State of Wiscoru:ir,.)

Contari'linated private or public: well >NR140 enf. std. = E~plosive or toxic vapors iJt structures _ ._ Threal. of fiR

•

HIGH OR MEDIUM FACTORS: (write in choice of high or medium) __ fioatlrlg prOduct (~ed1~m uno receptors within !.mile) __ .Known gw cont.unmauon (pnvate or public well <140 enf. std.) __ Impacted surface water • -wetland. trout stream, etc:. impacted __ Satutated soil contamination

. . . . . . .

MEDIUM FACTORS: (DEFiNmON: Any case w~ch ~s not~ to be~ immediate threat to human health or vital natural resource~ but which snows ieveB of conwt\ination that may cause substanaal envuommentalllTlpac:ts if left unaddressed.) · '

Moderate (e.g. 100 . SOO ppm TPH) soil contamination with moderare potential for impacting groundwater. = Impacted surface water • • no critical habitat threats. .

LOW FACTORS: DEFINITION: Any case where contamination has been doc:wnented., but which presents limited potential for any imm~ate threat to liuman hCilih and vual natural resources.)

~Soil contaminatio~ (e.g. less than ~00 ppm TPH) w.hich appears to have a limited potential for impacting groundwater. __ Initial remedial ac:uon has substanually reduced envuorunental threat.

UNK.'lOWN FACTOR: (DEFINITION: Any case where some indication of C!)nt,amination is presenl. but due to incomplete or inac:c:urate information the level of threat to human health or the envuonment can not be assessed at thiS tllTle.) . ·

__ Inadequate information to assign a high. medium, or low ranking.

OVERALL RANKING: The screening rank for the site along with the date of ranking. This may be updated when additional information is received. · Spec:11l cU'CWT\Stances for· a particular case may be taken into account in the comment section. The District LUST coordinator may independenr.ly set

the ranJting of a site based upon "special circumstances." O¥/!D/9 2,~ .

Circle one & date. indicate in priority screening box opposite side HIGH MEDIUM e;--UNKNOWN

Overall Site Commenc

NUMERICAL LUST SCORING WORKSHEET (Complete for LUST cases ranked HIGH) .

1. GROUNDWATER & SOILS: (circle one) eotNtr .

l} Municipal Well 18 >5 private wells 16 4 • 6 private wells 14 2 • 3 private wells 12 1 private well ____ SCORE

POJW"S . . Soil &: gw within 1200' of a public: well

6 Soil&: gw within 1200' of one or more private wells .4 GW contamination, no wells within 1200' 2 Soil contamination

•For purposes of this scoring, private well includes any non-municipal water supply system.

2. EXPLbsiVE oR toXic VAPORS: (circle one) POINTS CONFIIMED POTENTIAL

20 10 Explosive levels in a residence or building 8 Explosive levels in a sewer or structure

12 6 Toxic levels in a residence or building NOTE: Explosive levels determined to be >20% LEL u per an explosivity m.eter. toxicity levels are based

----- SCORE on OSHA permissible exposure limits (PEL) · . . . .

3. HYPROOFQI OGJC SETDNG· (circle one) PO!l'.l'S . .

U Permeable stratigraphy (gravel, sand. fractured bedrock or utilities capable of intercepting and directing flow) and sroundwater within 2.S feet of lhe ground surface. . · · · ·

IC• Permeable stratigraphy and groundwater greater than 2.S feet below ground surface. · It Moderately permeable stratigraphy (silty sands, silty gravel, clayey sands) and groundwa&cr within 2.S feet of -;round surface . 6 Moderately permeable stratigraphy and groundwater greater than 25 feet below ground surface. . 4 Impermeable stratigraphy (sill. clayey sill. sand clays) and groundwater within 25 feet of ground· surface. 2 Impermeable stratigraphy and groundwater greater than 25 feet below ground surface. ____ SCORE

4. TYPE QF PBQOt rcr. (circle one) POL'ITS

8 Gasoline, mixture of gasoline and other products, other light petroleum products. 6 Diesel, fuel oil. · 2. · R11nkM" oil. orht!f h~:~vv nih or mJiie fr~r:ti < •~ · . ·•· ··