deviance and conformity in the reproduction of order
TRANSCRIPT
Chapter 2
Deviance and Conformity in the
Reproduction of Order
Clifford D. Shearing
Recently, a number of theorists have directed attention to the problem of
identifying the mechanisms through which the state acts to preserve "the
hegemony of the dominant classes" (Burawoy, 1978: 59; see also Quinney, 1977: 80; Hall et al., 1978; Giddens, 1976; Beirne, 1979: 378). I have
elsewhere (Shearing, 1981) sought to contribute to this discussion by
elaborating upon Foucault's (1977) notion that social control has become
increasingly diffuse, invisible and automatic through the identification of
the subterranean mechanisms that direct and co-ordinate the activities of
police officers in ·the maintenance of order. 1 The argument advanced was that the police subculture co-ordinates police action so as to reproduce
structures of dominance in two ways. First, it encourages them to support
the productive classes-referred to as "the public"-in their struggle with
the unproductive "lumpen proletariat" -referred to by a variety of
derogatory epithets such as "the dregs" or "the scum" (see Quinney, 1977:
136 and Silver, 1967). Secondly, it defines the formal values supposedly governing the police organization (both the legal system and departmental policy) as no more than a normative framework to be used in the legitimation of police action (see Bittner, 1967a; Katz, 1972; Manning, 1977). 2
In this paper my purpose is to extend this analysis of the "mutual accommodation of power and norms in social interaction" (Giddens, 1976:
113) one step further by considering how individual police officers respondto the expectations of the police subculture as well as the formal values andrules governing the police organization. This analysis is directly relevant toParson's attempt to develop a voluntaristic account of the manner in whichnormative expectations are translated into social action (see Giddens, 1976:chap. 3). I will accordingly examine its implication for the development ofsuch a theory.
The Research
Both the analysis referred to above (Shearing, 1981) and the analysis to follow are based on research which took place within the Communications
Published as:
Shearing, C. 1981. Deviance and Conformity in the Reproduction of Order. In: Shearing, C. Eds. Organizational Police Deviance: Its Structure and Control. Toronto: Butterworths, 29-47.