challenges faced by micro finance institutions in credit
TRANSCRIPT
[jiC
C H A L L E N G E S F A C E D BY M I C R O F INANCE
INSTITUTIONS IN C R E D I T MANAGEMENT ^
B Y
I R E N E M U K I T I
United States Internaucriai ...,v Africa - Library
A Project Report Submitted to the Chandaria School of Business in
Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Masters in
Business Administration (MBA)
USIU-A
400000005080
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL U N I V E R S I T Y
F A L L 2013
STUDENT'S DECLARATION
I , the undersigned, declare that this is my original work and has not been submitted to any
other college, institution or university other than the United States International
University in Nairobi for academic credit.
Signed Date: 3 ^ 1 ̂ ' 1 ^ H
Irene Mukiti ID No: 623287
This project report has been presented for examination with my approval as the appointed
supervisor.
Signed: ( j g ^ ^ ^ Date: H
Dr. Amos Njuguna
Signed: (f^f^ Date:
Dean, Chandaria School of Business
ii
COPYRIGHT
All rights reservd.No part of this project may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system,
or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying,
recording or otherwise without prior written permission from the author.
Irene Ngali Mukiti. Copyright © 2013
iii
ABSTRACT
The main purpose of this research was to determine and identify the challenges faced by
micro finance institutions (MFIs) in credit management in Kenya. The study was guided
by the following research quesfions: What are the exposing factors to credit risk among
microfinance institutions? What is the relationship between credit management policy and
, customer retention? What are the guiding principles and practices that can be used to
manage credit risk in microfinance institutions?
In order to achieve the above, the study adopted a descriptive research design in order to
obtain the data that is necessary, which in essence facilitated the collection of the private
data as a way of getting into the research objectives. The population under study was 54
micro finance institutions. The collection of the private data was done using structured
questiormaires that were pilot tested in order to ensure that there was reliability as well as
validity. The coding of the data was done with the use of Microsoft Excel as weH as
Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) in order to generate the descriptive
statistics for instance frequencies and percentages.
Data analysis was done through descriptive and inferential statistics which included
percentages, frequencies, and regression tables. Data was presented in pictorial
representation in the form of tables and figures.
The study findings reveled that there are various exposing factors to credit risk among
microfinance institutions in Kenya. Specifically the majority of the respondents were of
the opinion that loans to individuals, highly contributed to credit risk, followed by
involvement in foreign exchange trade, operational risk, prevailing inflation rates,
prevailing interest rates group loans and finally, investment in bonds and equities. This
implies that indeed issuance of loans to individuals is highly risk as compared to groups.
It also implies that investment bonds and equities are less risky.
Additionally it was revealed that there is a positive relationship between credit
management policy measures and customer retention. Similarly the majority of the
respondents agree on the various credit management policy measures by the MFIs.
Specifically it was revealed that majority of the respondents agree that repeat customers
are asked for collateral security each time they get a loan. Similarly majority of the
respondents agree that customers are frequently trained on the different products offered
iv
by the MFI. In the same regard, majority of the respondents agree that credit officers
verify information provided by the loan applicant each time. Additionally majority of the
respondents agree that managers establish long-term business relationship with customers
through continued communication, as well interest rates are competitively set compared
to other MFIs. Finally respondents agree that credit time and duration issued are
dependent on the loan type. These findings imply that indeed, MFIs do not discriminate
among different customers when it comes to credit policy measures. However, MFIs seek
continued customer relations in order to enhance customer retention
The study also revealed that the credit control policy implemented determines the risk
exposure. It was also revealed that the Management Information System adopted by an
MFI helps in risk reduction. Fureth maintaining an appropriate credit administration and
monitoring of customers helps reduce on risk. Finally, it was revealed that efficient
internal controls, supervision and audit are adequate to mitigate credit risk.
The study concludes that that there is a positive relationship between credit management
policy measures and customer retention. The study also concludes that the credit control
policy implemented determines the risk exposure. Finally, the study concludes that
efficient internal controls, supervision and audit are adequate to mitigate credit risk.
In light of the findings on this objective, the study recommends that MFI officials should
be able to identify the inadequacy of collateral security/equitable mortgage against loan.
The institutions should review the unrealistic terms and schedule of repayment. The
institution should also impose proper follow up measures to ensure that clients use loans
for purpose approved for. The study also recommends that since poor customers generally
have no credit history and little collateral, MFIs must use innovative lending practices to
reduce risks associated with asymmetric information between lender and borrower. The
best way to retain these customers is upon the manager's initiative in developing
voluntary savings products where customers save money which can be helpful for MFIs
in mobilizing savings to lend out at low cost compared to the market. Further the study
recommends that entrepreneurs should address labor problems in the market.
V
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I would like to thank God almighty for His guidance and providence all through my
studies, I also appreciate and thank Dr. Amos Njuguna my supervisor for his support ,
guidance, timely and wise counsel during the preparation of this project report.To the
different staff of all the Micro fmance institutions visited during the research period thank
you for your cooperation. Finally special thanks to my family for their continued support
and encouragement all through my studies and to all friends made a great contribution to
this project .God bless you all.
Irene N. Mukiti
USIU, Fall 2013
vi
T A B L E OF CONTENTS
STUDENT'S DECLARATION ii
COPYRIGHT iii
ABSTRACT iv
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT vi
TABLE OF CONTENTS vii
LIST OF TABLES x
LIST OF FIGURES xi
ABBREVIATIONS xii
CHAPTER ONE 1
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Background of the Study 1
1.2 Statement of the Problem 4
1.3 Purpose of the Study 4
1.4 Research Questions 4
1.5 Significance of the Study 5
1.6 Scope of the study 5
1.7 Definition of Terms 5
1.8 Chapter summary 6
CHAPTER TWO 7
2.0 L ITERATURE R E V I E W 7
2.1 Introduction 7
2.2 Espousing Factors to Credit Risk among Microfinance Institutions 7
vii
2.3 Credit Management policies and Customer Retention 10
2.4 Guiding Principles and Practices to Manage Credit Risk in Microfinance Insfitutions 15
2.5 Chapter Summary 21
CHAPTER T H R E E 22
3.0 METHODOLOGY 22
3.1 Introduction 22
3.2 Research Design 22
3.3 Population and Sampling 22
3.4 Data Collection Methods 24
3.5 Research Procedures 24
3.6 Data Analysis Methods 24
3.7 Chapter Summary 25
CHAPTER FOUR 26
4.0 DATA ANALYSIS AND PRESENTATION 26
4.1 Introduction 26
4.2 Background Information 26
4.3 Exposing Factors to Credit Risk among Microfinance Institufions 28
4.4 Relafionship between Credit Management Policy and Customer Retention 33
4.5 Guiding Principles and Practices to Manage Credit Risk 34
4.6 Chapter Summary 38
vii i
CHAPTER F I V E 39
5.0 DISCUSSION, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 39
5.1 Introduction 39
5.2 Summary 39
5.3 Discussion 41
5.4 Conclusions 46
5.5 Recommendations 47
REFERENCES 49
APPENDICES 52
APPENDIX I : L E T T E R OF INTRODUCTION 52
APPENDIX I I : QUESTIONNAIRE FOR MFI E M P L O Y E E S 53
APPENDIX I I I : BUDGET 57
ix
L IST OF T A B L E S
Table 4.1 Position in the Company 26
Table 4.2: Years in Existence 27
Table 4.3: Relationship between Credit Management Policy and Customer Retention....34
X
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 4.1: Type of Loans 28
Figure 4.2: Exposing Factors to Credit Risk among Microfinance Insfitutions 28
Figure 4.3: Loans to Groups 29
Figure 4.4: Loans to Individuals 30
Figure 4.5: Operafion Risk 30
Figure 4.6: Investment in Bonds 31
Figure 4.7: Prevailing Interest Rates 31
Figure 4.8: Prevailing Inflation Rates 32
Figure 4.9: Prevailing Inflation Rates 32
Figure 4.10: Relationship between Credit Management Policy and Customer Retention 33
Figure 4.11: Credit Control Policy Implemented Determines Risk Exposure 35
Figure 4.12: Oversight of MFIs by senior management would help Reduce Risk 36
Figure 4.13: Management Informafion System adopted by an MFI helps in Risk
Reduction 36
Figure 4.14: Maintaining an Appropriate Credit Administration 37
Figure 4.15: Efficient Internal Controls, Supervision and Audit 38
xi
ABBREVIATIONS
CR Credit Risk
CRM Credit Risk Management
FI Financial Institutions
MFIs Micro fmance institutions
MSEs Micro and Small Enterprises
SME Small and medium enterprise
KWFT Kenya Women Finance Trust
xi i
CHAPTER ONE
1.0 INTRODUCTION
l.lBackground of the Study
Financial institutions (FIs) are very important in any economy. Their role is similar to that
of blood arteries in the human body, because FIs pump financial resources for economic
growth from the depositories to where they are required. Microfinance institutions are FIs
and are key providers of financial information to the economy. They play even a most
critical role to emergent economies where borrowers have no access to capital markets.
There is evidence that well-functioning Microfinance institutions accelerate economic
growth (Richard et al., 2008).
Microfinance has been defined as the provision of financial services such as deposits,
loans, payment services, money transfers and insurance to low-income, poor and
excluded people enabling them to raise their income and living standards (Aghion and
Morduch, 2005). It consists of lending and recycling very small amounts of money for
short periods of time. Microfinance or microcredit has therefore been associated with
helping empower the poor to account properly and independently for their small
businesses and thus manage their livelihoods better (Richard et al., 2008). On the other
hand, poverty alleviation has been a long term goal of governments and key international
institutions such as the World Bank and United Nations seeking more effective ways of
reaching the poor. The importance of microfinance as a targeted strategy for poverty
alleviation lies in its ability to reach the grassroots with financial services based more on
a "bottom-up" as opposed to "top-down" approach (Dixon et al., 2006).
When Muhammad Yunus, an economics professor at a Bangladesh university, started
making small loans to local villagers in the 1970s, it was unclear where the idea would
go. Around the world, scores of state-run banks had already tried to provide loans to poor
households, and they left a legacy of inefficiency, corruption, and millions of dollars of
squandered subsidies. Today, Muhammad Yunus is recognized as a visionary in a
movement that has spread globally, claiming over 65 million customers at the end of
2002 (Richard et al., 2008). They are served by microfinance institutions that are
providing small loans without collateral, collecting deposits, and, increasingly, selling
1
insurance, all to customers who had been written off by commercial banks as being
unprofitable (Aghion and Morduch, 2005).
Indonesia was the first developing country to establish large scale commercial
microfinance systems (Richard et a l , 2008). Banks in developing countries typically
serve no more than 20% of the population leaving the rest with little, i f any, access to
financial services. The unserved majority which employs as much as 60% of the
economically active population depends on informal and semi-formal sources of finance
(Aghion and Morduch, 2005). Most of the entities providing microfinance services are
non-formal and semi-formal institutions not subject to prudential regulations which apply
to banks and other formal-sector institutions. The ability of most micro finance
institutions (MFIs) to leverage capital and mobilize external resources is generally
limited. To support outreach to low-income clients, donated resources are generally
leveraged and augmented by borrowing from formal financial institutions or large
institutional and individual investors, or accepting limited deposits from the public
(Greuning, Gallardo and Randhawa, 1998).
Credit risk arises fi-om uncertainty in a given counterparty's ability to meet its obligations.
The increasing variety in the types of counterparties and the ever-expanding variety in the
forms of obligations have meant that credit risk management has jumped to the forefront
of risk management activities carried out by firms in the financial services industry
(Fatemi and Fooladi, 2006).
Risk taking is an inherent element and integral part of financial services in general and of
microfinance in particular and, indeed, profits are in part the reward for successful risk
taking in business (Aghion and Morduch, 2005). On the other hand, excessive and poorly
managed credit can lead to losses and thus endanger the safety and soundness of
microfinance institutions and safety of microfinance institution's depositors.
Consequently, microfinance institutions may fail to meet its social and financial
objectives. This implies that proactive risk management is essential to the long term
sustainability of microfinance institutions (MFIS). Therefore, it is believed that effective
risk management allows MFIs to capitalize on new opportunities and to minimize threats
to their financial viability (NBE, 2010).
2
According to Ahamed (2010), credit policy is a management philosophy for spelling out
the decision variables of credit standards, credit terms and collection efforts by which
managers in MFIs have an influence on their operations. The credit policy impacts on the
impact of MFIs depending on the lending approaches used to screen clients for credit
facilities which are either liberal or stringent in nature. These approaches are effective and
efficient provided managers are competent with the relevant skills, knowledge and
experience of leading teams to achieve the set targets.
However, lack of collateral and high interest rates as an impediment to access to loans
from Micro finance institutions (MFIs) by micro entrepreneurs (Ahamed, 2010). Micro
entrepreneurs who secure fiinds from such institutions spend the bulk of their returns on
investment in paying the cost of capital, thus leaving them with none or little savings for
reinvestment. As a result, the majority of micro enterprises fail to grow into Small and
eventually Medium enterprises. Therefore, to bring the youth on board, the Kenyan
government with the support of development partners in 2006 established a youth
enterprise development ftmd that is channelled to Micro finance Institutions and other
financial intermediaries for onward lending to the youth without collateral (Ahamed,
2010). Such a fund attracts a greatly reduced cost of capital which stands at 8% per
annum as a strategy to make the fund affordable to the youth who in many cases do not
have collateral and therefore ideal for start-ups. Given that the vision of micro finance is
to promote the growth of micro enterprises, MFIs and other financial intermediaries have
experienced rapid growth to support the micro enterprises. One such institution is the
Kenya Rural Enterprise Program (K-REP) , a non-governmental organization that was
started in 1984 under the funding of the US AID (Simeyo et al, 2011).
To date, a number of MFIs and financial intermediaries including K-REP, Equity bank,
Kenya women finance trust (KWFT) and Faulu Kenya provide micro finance services to
the low income groups for purposes of starting or developing income generating
activities. Financial services deepening (FSD), (2009) indicates that MSEs access to
credit has increased greatly from 7.5% in 2006 to 17.9% in 2009 (Simeyo et al, 2011).
3
1.2 Statement of the Problem
Microfinance institutions face various risks that can be categorized into three groups,
financial risk with credit risk being a component, operational risk and strategic risk
(Teferri, 2000). These risks have different impact on the performance of MFIs. The
magnitude and the level of loss caused by customer risk compared to others is severe to
cause bank or MFI failures. Over the years, there have been an increased number of
significant bank problems in both matured and emerging economies. Various researchers
have studied reasons behind bank and MFIs problems and identified several factors.
Credit problems, especially weakness in credit risk management, have been identified to
be a part of the major reasons behind banking difficulties (Simeyo et al, 2011). Loans
constitute a large proportion of CR as they normally account for 10-15 times the equity of
an MFI. Thus, banking business is likely to face difficulties when there is a slight
deterioration in the quality of loans. Poor loan quality has its roots in the information
processing mechanism (Teferri, 2000). These problems are at their acute stage in
developing countries. The problem often begins right at the loan application stage and
increases ftorther at the loan approval, monitoring and controlling stages, especially when
credit risk management guidelines in terms of policy strategies and procedures for credit
processing do not exist or weak or incomplete (Richard et al., 2008).
Studies conducted so far on Micro enterprises (Teferri, 2000) and on manufacturing firms'
case located in Kenya do not specifically touch the case of micro finance institutions.
This study therefore tried to narrow the research gap paying attention to this sector of the
economy. Studies done on micro enterprises are meant to evaluate the institutional
sustainability of the credit scheme. This study therefore sought to examine broadly
challenges faced by micro finance institutions in credit management.
1.3 Purpose of the Study
The purpose of the study was to determine and identify the challenges faced by micro
finance institutions in credit management in Kenya.
1.4 Research Questions
1.4.1 What are the exposing factors to credit risk among microfinance institutions?
1.4.2 What is the relationship between credit management policy and customer retention?
4
1.4.3 What are the guiding principles and practices that can be used to manage credit risk
in microfinance institutions?
1.5 Significance of the Study
The following subsection presents a detailed summary of the importance of the study to
the various institutions and individuals.
1.5.1 Microfinance institutions
It will help micro finance institutions know the impact they have on their clients and how
to ensure efficient running between the two parties when it comes to credit issuing and
repayment.
1.5.2 Government
The study will be of help to the government and policy makers to put in place laws and
regulations that support credit management systems by banks and MFIs. The study wil l
recommend areas of improvement in debt collection for the sake of sound collection of
loans in microfinance institutions sector, boost the confidence of savers and borrowers
who transact with these microfinance institutions.
1.5.3 Scholars and researchers
The study will contribute to the existing body of knowledge on microfinance institutions
to academicians and make recommendations arising from its findings for further research
on this or other related areas of study.
1.6 Scope of the study
To cover all the regions in the entire country was impossible because of the limited time
frame and amount of funds for this research. For this reason, the study was limited to
Nairobi and targeted microfinance institutions.
1.7 Definition of Terms
1.7.1 Entrepreneur
An entrepreneur is a person who organizes and manages a business undertaking and
assumes a risk of a business enterprise for the sake of profits (Dessler, 2000).
5
1.7.2 Micro finance institutions (MFI)
Microfinance is the provision of financial services in small increments, typically to very
poor people (Robinson, 2001).
1.7.3 Portfolio Management
Portfolio management can be defined as the monitoring the performance of a firms total
loan fund (SEEP, 2009).
1.7.4 Loan Portfolio
This can be defined as the outstanding principal balance of all of the MFI 's outstanding
loans including current, delinquent and restructured loans due within 2months, but not
loans that have been written off (SEEP, 2009).
1.7.5 Portfolio at Risk .
Portfolio at risk is the value of all loans outstanding that have one or more installments of
principal past due more than a certain number of days (SEEP, 2009).
1.8 Chapter summary
The chapter has given a background of the study which indicates the origin of micro
finance institutions and shows their importance in the current world especially to small
and medium entrepreneurs and most important the credit management faced by MFIs. It
has also highlighted the purpose of the study which was to determine and identify the
challenges faced by micro finance institutions in credit management in Kenya. The
chapter also presented the research questions, justification of the study, scope of the study
and definition of terms. The next chapter gives a review of literature relating to
challenges faced by microfinance institutions in credit management. The third chapter
covers the research methodology while the fourth chapter provides the research findings
lastly final chapter gives a summary of the findings, conclusion and recommendations.
CHAPTER TWO
2.0 LITERATURE R E V I E W
2.1 Introduction
The purpose of this chapter was to determine and identify the challenges faced by micro
fmance institutions in credit management in Kenya This chapter addresses the espousing
factors to credit risk among microfinance institutions, the relationship between credit
management policy and customer retention and the guiding principles and practices can
be used to manage credit risk in microfinance institutions.
2.2 Espousing Factors to Credit Risk among Microfinance Institutions
According to Ogilo (2012), Financial institutions have faced difficulties over the years for
a multitude of reasons, the major cause of serious banking problems continues to be
directly related to lax credit standards for borrowers and counterparties, poor portfolio
risk management or a lack of attention to changes in economic or other circumstances that
can lead to a deterioration in the credit standing of a bank's counterparties. For most
banks and MFIs, loans are the largest and most obvious source of credit risk however,
other sources of credit risk exist throughout the activities of a bank, including in the
banking book and in the trading book, and both on and off the balance sheet. Banks and
FMIs are increasingly facing credit risk (or counterparty risk) in various financial
instruments other than loans, including acceptances, interbank transactions, trade
financing, foreign exchange transactions, financial futures, swaps, bonds, equities,
options, and in the extension of commitments and guarantees, and the settlement of
transactions.
Watkins and Hicks (2009), indicate that microfinance institutions have become an
integral part in the financial market by making microloans to low-income borrowers
mostly in the developing and transition economies. Microfinance has been argued to
charge high interest rates to ensure that their organizations are financially sustainable.
The two place arguments that by doing so, microfinance institutions ensure permanence
and expansion of the services they provide.
7
Yehuala (2008), concurring that microfinance charges higher interest rates, notes that
loan size rather than interest charged is what is relevant in making loan acquisition
decision. Loan provided by formal financial institutions is usually small, due to the risk
averseness, and a gap is created which is filled by accessing money from private lenders
at a higher interest rate. However, Peace (2011) contradicts that position by stating that
interest rate is a relevant factor in loan acquisition decision as it is set by institutions to
sort potential borrowers.
Applying stringent lending criteria to low-income borrowers may in effect lead to their
exclusion from the financial system which is not socially acceptable or legitimate. At the
same time, failure to accommodate for credit risk increases the likelihood of loan default
which in the short term increases financial institutions costs and in the long term is passed
on to other borrowers in the form of more expensive and or less accessible retail credit.
Failure to differentiate lending policies to reflect credit risk may lead all borrowers to
suffer through reduced availability of low cost credit. The likelihood of this is increased
by the moral hazard problem that households when applying for funding, overstate their
ability to meet the repayment schedule of the lender (Ralston, D and Wright, A , 2003).
2.2.1 Credit Risk Types
Operational risk is the risk of direct or indirect loss resulting from inadequate or failed
intemal processes, people and systems or from external events or unforeseen
catastrophes. It includes the exposure to loss resulting from the failure of a manual or
automated system to process, produce or analyse transactions in an accurate, timely and
secure manner. Operational risk therefore is imbedded in all of the microfinance
institution's operations including those supporting the management of other risks (NBE,
2010).
Managing operational risk is an important feature of sound risk management practice in
any microfinance institution (NBE, 2010). The exact approach chosen by an individual
microfinance institution will depend on a range of factors, including its size and
sophistication and the nature and complexity of its activities. Common operational risks
in MFIs include the following: The system does not correctly reflect loan tracking, e.g.
information on amount disbursed, payment received, current status of outstanding
8
balance, aging of loan by portfolio outstanding (Steinwand, 2000). Lack of effectiveness
and insecurity of management information system in general and the portfolio
management system in particular e.g. software does not have intemal safety features,
inaccurate MIS and untimely reports; Inconsistencies between the loan management
system data and the accounting system data; Treating rescheduled loan as on-site loans;
Lack of portfolio related fraud controls; Loan tracking information is not adequate. The
most important types of operational risk could also involve breakdowns in intemal
systems and controls and corporate govemance. Such breakdowns can often lead to
financial losses through error, fraud or inefficiency. Other aspects of operational risk
include major failure of information technology systems or events such as natural and
other disasters. As microfinance institutions become more reliant on technology to
support various aspects of their operations, the potential failure of a technology based
system is of growing concem in the context of the management of operational risk (NBE,
2010).
Foreign exchange risk is the potential for loss of eamings or capital resulting from
fluctuations in currency values (Tamil, 2010). Microfinance institutions most often
experience foreign exchange risk when they borrow or mobilize savings in one currency
and lend in another (Robinson, 2001). For example, MFIs that offer dollar savings
accounts and lend in the local currency risk financial loss i f the value of the local
currency weakens against the dollar. Altematively, i f the local currency strengthens
against the dollar, the MFI experiences a financial gain. Due to the potential severity of
the downside risk, an MFI should avoid funding the loan portfolio with foreign currency
unless it can match its foreign liabilities with foreign assets of equivalent duration and
maturity. In Ghana, the appreciation of the dollar actually caused many MFIs that were
dependent on dollar-denominated loans to begin mobilizing local savings in 1999 to
reduce the currency mismatch of assets and liabilities. To reduce investment portfolio
risk, treasury managers stagger investment maturities to ensure that the MFI has the long-
term funds needed for growth and expansion. In addition, they consider the credit,
inflation, and currency risks that might threaten the value of the principal investment.
Short-term investments, for example, carry less risk of losing value due to inflation
(Steinwand, 2000).
9
According to Rosenberg (1999), Micro Finance Institutions (MFIs) are increasingly a
central source of credit for the poor in many countries. Weekly collection of repayment
instalments by bank personnel is one of the key features of microfinance that is believed
to reduce default risk in the absence of collateral and make lending to the poor viable.
Some of the factors that lead to loan default include; inadequate or non-monitoring of
micro and small enterprises by banks, leading to defaults, delays by banks in processing
and disbursement of loans, diversion of funds, over concentration of decision making,
where all loans are required by some banks to be sanctioned by Area/Head Offices.
Weekly collection of repayment instalments by bank personnel is one of the key features
of microfinance that is believed to reduce default risk in the absence of collateral and
make lending to the poor viable (Vogelgesang, 2003). In addition, frequent meetings with
a loan officer may improve client trust in loan officers and their willingness to stay on
track with repayments.
2.3 Credit Management policies and Customer Retention
According to Ralston and Wright (2003), attracting and retaining profitable customers,
and increasing reviews from those customers are a priority of managers of all firms in
today's globalised marketplace. It is particularly important in the highly competitive retail
financial services market where the core business of banking continues to be the
profitable management of risk. For banks and other financial services firms, risk
management is consistent with their profit maximizing objectives which is evidenced by
provision of tailor made products and personal loan packages to profitable low income
customers (Kenny, 2010).
For MFIs managers need to reduce the risk of loan default because the institutions'
financial viability is weakened by the loss of principal and interest the cost of carry and
the opportunity cost of management time taken to recover capital at risk (Harris, 2001).
Yet on the other hand, MFIs operate under the objective of maximizing benefits to
members, which includes the social role of providing loans to help customers achieve
their standards of living goals. This social role can conflict with financial viability i f it
means managers become less stringent in the application of sound lending practices to
access and monitor the credit risk of borrowers (Ralston, D and Wright, A , 2003).
10
The purpose of customer retention is to ensure that an institution maintains relationships
with value adding customers. Such an objective is attained when retained customers are
offered quality goods and services which fulfil their needs (Kenny, 2010). According to
Harris (2001), customers who willingly renew their loan contracts are more satisfied with
the services than those who do not. The satisfied customers therefore utter positive word
of mouth which influences the beliefs, feelings and behaviours of other customers which
facilitates the efforts of micro finances in extending outreach to customers (Harris, 2001).
Similarly loan applications are shorter for retained customers because loan officers take
little fime to conduct on site business evaluation for each loan (Kenny, 2010). This is also
true for clients with good repayment records whose costs of serving lowers the
transaction costs leading to efficiency, increased number of client reached and at the
same time enabling loan officers to have time of marketing and educating more customers
about financial products hence lowering the acquisition costs for customers (Craig, 2010).
Customer retention facilitates outreach by improving efficiency and enhancing
productivity as repeat borrowers with good repayment records require less time to
manage than new clients (Harris, 2001). This effect of improved efficiency is helpful to
MFIs serving the lower market segment because of compensation for the small loan
balances given out. Likewise retained customers reduce the lending risks due to the fact
that sufficient information is built on their cash flows and business performance which
facilitates MFIs to make optimal credit decisions while modifying the lending terms as
per the identified risks (Micro save, 2010). Dawkins (2010) shows that retained customers
who are loyal and satisfied by the services generate increasing profits over time for MFIs
due to the lower acquisition costs, higher loan balances which are used to subsidize the
cost structure inform of interest rates and processing fees to new customers. However, not
all customers are interested in borrowing all the time (Clark, 2010).The best way to retain
these customers is upon the manager's initiative in developing voluntary savings products
where customers save money which can be helpful for MFIs in mobilizing savings to lend
out at low cost compared to the market (Craig, 2010). The next subsection looks at the
collateral requirements.
11
2.3.1 The collateral Requirements
One reason for the development of the microfinance industry is that traditional banks do
not serve persons who cannot offer traditional collateral. Many micro lending
methodologies use peer groups, restrictive product terms and compulsory savings as
collateral substitutes. Subsequent lending innovations provide microloans with non-
traditional collateral, such as household assets and consigners' (Harris, 2001). Pawn
lending and asset leasing are other methods of overcoming collateral constraints. Perhaps
more important than the type of collateral is how it is used. In microfinance, collateral is
primarily employed as an indication of the applicant's commitment. It is rarely used as a
secondary repayment source because the outstanding balance is so small that it is not
cost-effective to liquidate the collateral, much less legally register it i f such a service is
available (Peace, 2011). Only when clients are not acting in good faith do micro lenders
take a hard line stance and seize collateral. Consequently, MFIs tend to be less concerned
about the ratio of the loan size to the value of collateral than how the clients would feel i f
the collateral was taken from them. As the loan size increases, however, this soft
approach to collateral needs to change so those larger loans are indeed backed by
appropriate security (Churchill and Coster, 2001).
Since poor customers generally have no credit history and little collateral, MFIs must use
innovative lending practices to reduce risks associated with asymmetric information
between lender and borrower. In fact, several studies have focused on understanding the
mechanisms of lending practices such as group loans, a type of joint-liability loan,
whereby the MFI delegates screening, monitoring, and contract enforcement costs to a
group, and individual uncollateralized loans, whereby repayment is secured with a
promise of access to larger loans in the futiu-e conditional on current loan repayment
(Hartarska, Cropper and Caudill, 2012).
According to Christl and Pribil (2004), that evaluation of the collateral provided by the
credit applicant is an essential element in the credit approval process and thus has an
impact on the overall assessment of the credit risk involved in a possible exposure. The
main feature of a collateralized credit is not only the borrowers personal credit standing,
which basically determines the probability of default, but the collateral which the lender
can realize in case the customer defaults and which thus deter-mines the MFIs loss. Via
12
the risk component of loss given default and any other requirements concerning credit
risk mitigation techniques, the value of the collateral is included in calculating the capital
requirement under Basel I I . In order to calculate the risk parameters under Basel I I
correctly, it is important for the valuation of the collateral to be effected completely
independently of the calculation of the borrowers probability default in the credit rating
process.
2.3.2 Education and Training To Customers
MFI staff and the customers need sufficient training so that they can understand the
numerous regulations, policies, and procedures governing loan funds. Audit reports have
found that deficiencies in loan and grant oversight are not due to a lack of policies, but
rather that existing policies are not being followed (Harris, 2001). Federal, State, and
local government offices are responsible for ensuring that staffs are properly trained to
fulfil grant requirements (Peace, 2011). It is essential that grantees also receive training,
particularly small entities not familiar with all of the regulations and policies. Improving
skills of staff can be a long-term process that needs a strategic approach. When the
Environmental Protection Agency. Providing training of staff helps to ensure that eligible
recipients understand how to apply for loans and properly use the funds (Bangladesh
Bank, 2005).
A critical step towards service excellence is investing in the skills and knowledge
development of servers, giving them the preparation to serve and, in so doing, stoking
their desire to serve. The training should focus on the understanding of why service
excellence is important both to the organization and the individual employees, not just
how and what needs to be done. The combination of developing skills, on-the-job
knowledge, and internalizing organizational goals should be the key purpose of the
employee training. It can stimulate their enthusiasm about their work and about new
challenges to satisfy customer expectations. Employee development starts from recruited
personnel who have the ability, desire and personality to be excellent service providers
(Kim and Kleiner, 1996). The next subsection looks at the accountability to staff
13
2.3.3 Accountability of Staff
According to Symonds, Wright and Ott (2007), customer-led MFIs lay the foundation for
a deeper relationship from the outset. Through a carefully crafted after-sale process, they
capitalize on the enthusiasm new customers bring to their selection of product and
provider by arranging an initial welcoming call in the first week and initiating a month-
by-month follow-up program to help customers better understand account features. They
monitor this "overinvestment" in new customers to determine how customers are using
the bank's services and systematically track any potential problems that could cause a
new customer to defect. When they spot mishaps successive months of late fees, for
instance they act pre-emptively to correct the problem and rescue the relationship. Senior
managers, troubled by the periodic peaks in attrition among new customers, should see a
big opportunity to get more value out of their customer-acquisition investments by
helping new members discover service features that best suited their needs.
Tracking how well staffs deliver on promises is integral to the leaders' approach to
managing the customer relationship. What customers experience day by day in contacts
they have with each branch office or call centre determines the quality of the on-going
relationship. For clear account statements, an orderly branch appearance and easy to
understand product information which can be thought of as "hygiene factors" customers
expect execution to be error-free (or that, in its breach, the bank will make promptly
acknowledge its mistake and work to regain the customer's good wil l (Harris, 2001).
Thus, many banks need to invest in improving basic processes first before they can begin
exceeding customer expectations (Symonds, Wright and Ott, 2007).
Converting customers into loyalists and, even better, making them recruiters of still more
customers requires a disciplined, muhiyear initiative (Peace, 2011). The process of
becoming a customer-led bank begins with a commitment to eliminate self-defeating
behaviours that blind the organization to customers' needs. Putting customer loyalty at
the heart of growth requires banks to master new disciplines (Tamil, 2010). They must
learn to nurture the loyal core of their customer base and hone skills for spotting and
attracting the right new customers. Retail bank executives across the world are awakening
to the realization that long-term growth and profitability hinge on their ability to attract
14
and retain loyal customers. That recognition has been a long time in coming. It's being
spurred by a potent combination of increasing competition, regulatory scrutiny and
customers' easier access to a broad range of new products and services and thus MFIs
should adapt these practices. The literature has established various policy measures on
credit management, and indeed it is evident that the various measures put in place, are
sufficient enough to deal with the riskiness of MFIs, however the literature has not
comprehensively articulated how such policy measures can enhance customer retention.
In this regard therefore the study sought to fill in these gaps, by seeking to establish how
such measures enhance customer retention.
2.4 Guiding Principles and Practices to Manage Credit Risk in Microfinance
Institutions
According to Ralston and Wright (2003), sound lending procedures in retail financial
institutions involve identifying high-risk applicants, modifying loan conditions such as
security requirements and monitoring repayments post-loan approval. For managers of
MFIs this procedure is complicated by the need to balance between the institutions' social
objective of improving loan accessibility to the poor and the possibility of reducing the
institutions viability through loan default. Customers experiencing some bankruptcy-
related default on personal loans indicate that managers do not impose more stringent
lending conditions on high-risk borrowers. However, social and viability objectives could
be better balanced through careful loan monitoring and timely arrears practices. The next
subsection looks at the adequate control over credit risk.
2.4.1 Adequate Control over Credit Risk
A number of techniques are available to microfinance institutions to assist in the
mitigation of credit risk. Group collateral and guarantees are the most commonly used.
Various forms of other collateral and guarantees (Including physical collateral, personal
guarantees etc.) could also be used. Notwithstanding the use of various mitigation
techniques individual credit transactions should be entered into primarily on the strength
of the borrower's repayment capacity (Harris, 2001). Microfinance institutions should
also be mindful that the value of collateral might well be impaired by the same factors
that have led to the diminished recoverability of the credit. Microfinance institutions
15
should have policies covering the acceptability of various forms of collateral, procedures
for the ingoing valuation of such collateral, and a process to ensure that collateral is, and
continues to be enforceable and realizable (Harris, 2001). With regard to guarantees,
microfinance institutions should evaluate the level of coverage being provided in relation
to the credit-quality and legal capacity of the guarantor and should be careful when
making assumptions about implied support from third parties including government
entities (NBE,2010).
Similar to capital market investors, which rely on external credit ratings provided by
rating agencies, banks and MFIs can assign intemal credit ratings to evaluate the credit
worthiness of borrowers (Peace, 2011). These ratings provide a screening tactic to
alleviate asymmetric information problems between borrowers and lenders. Such
transaction-based lending technologies have become even more important with the
introduction of Basel I I , which has pushed banks to adopt new credit risk management
techniques, including credit-scoring models, to analyse credit worthiness (NBE, 2010).
According to the NBE report (2010), small business loans and retail credit are less
sensitive to systematic risk and their maturities are shorter under Basel I I , retail credit and
loans to low income earners are treated differently than corporate loans, such that they
require less regulatory capital for given probabilities of defaults. However, Basel I I also
assumes that a smaller borrower suffers a greater probability of default. Basel I I
encourages banks to update their intemal systems and procedures to manage their
customer loans. Banks can create their own credit-scoring models, so SMEs seeking bank
financing must overcome the doubts created by the banks' intemal rating models and
analyses of their probability of default I f a firm knows its own creditworthiness, it might
have a better chance of gaining fair treatment from lenders, reducing the loan interest rate,
and mitigating the average cost of capital. Moreover, this knowledge would increase
transparency in the credit process, which itself would be beneficial (Gama and Geraldes,
2012). The next subsection looks at how an active board and senior management
oversight helps to enhance customer retention.
16
2.4.2 Active Board and Senior Management Oversight
The board of directors is responsible for approving and reviewing the liquidity risk
management strategy and policies of the microfinance institution (Peace, 2011). Each
microfinance institution should develop a strategy that sets the objectives of ensuring that
the microfinance institution at all times, has adequate levels of liquidity to meet its
operational needs and should adopt the necessary policies and procedures to achieve this
objective. At a minimum, the board should: Understand the nature and level of
institution's liquidity risk; At all-time be informed of the institution's liquidity risk;
approve broad business strategies, policies, guidelines and intemal control and limits for
managing and monitoring liquidity; establish tolerance levels in respect of liquidity risk;
establish clear levels of delegation within the liquidity management function; ensure that
the microfinance institution's management adopts procedures to enable the achievement
of the objectives set out in the strategy and poHcies; ensure that the management
measures, monitors and controls liquidity risk; effectively communicate the strategies and
policies to all relevant microfinance institution personnel; ensure that the liquidity
management framework is regularly reviewed; ensure that the management information
systems are in place which can adequately measure, monitor, control and report liquidity
risk (NBE,2010).
The board of directors should have responsibility for approving and periodically (at least
annually) reviewing the credit risk strategy and significant credit risk policies of the bank
(NBE, 2010). The strategy should reflect the bank's tolerance for risk and the level of
profitability the bank expects to achieve for incurring various credit risks. Senior
management should have responsibility for implementing the credit risk strategy
approved by the board of directors and for developing policies and procedures for
identifying, measuring, monitoring and controlling credit risk (Peace, 2011). Such
policies and procedures should address credit risk in all of the bank's activities and at
both the individual credit and portfolio levels. MFIs should identify and manage credit
risk inherent in all products and activities and should ensure that the risks of products and
activities new to them are subject to adequate risk management procedures and controls
before being introduced or undertaken, and approved in advance by the board of directors
17
or its appropriate committee. The following subsection looks at how management
information system enhances customer retention.
2.4.3 Management Information System
To properly control risks, an MFI needs a strong information system. Being that risk
management is a dynamic three-step cycle in which MFIs identify their risks, design and
implement controls to mitigate these risks, and establish systems to monitor them. These
monitoring systems are then used to help identify additional risks, setting in motion a
dynamic process (Christen, 2000). Management information systems (MIS) lie at the
heart of this dynamic, serving as the primary link between these three elements. Whether
computerized or manual, an effective MIS provides critical information for risk
identification, acts as a mechanism for systematizing business processes and controls, and
offers a tool for monitoring organizational performance and pinpointing future risk areas.
As such, MIS is the foundation for effective risk management. MIS includes all the
systems used for generating the information that guides management in its decisions and
action. Good information is essential for an MFI to perform efficiently and effectively.
MIS must be accurate and easy to use. By transforming data, or unprocessed facts, into
information through a systematic process, management information systems provide tools
for identifying, controlling and monitoring key risks within an organization. The better
the information, the better the MFI can manage its risks (Waterfield and Ramsing, 1998).
Good MIS assists MFI 's maximize their outreach to the poor so that economies of scale
can be enjoyed fully. Appropriate MIS goes a long way to assist programs with an easy
was to analyse data for improving their program design and to assist in the development
of products that are geared to meeting the needs of the people (Christen, 2000).
According to Gibbons (2000), there is a need to improve the capacity of programs to
handle greater responsibilities and be able to control greater amounts of funds. It is
important for programs to update and improve other essential systems as well, like
computerized MIS and plarming with the micro finance so as to give management the
tools they need. The next subsection reviews literature on efficient intemal controls,
supervision and audit can be used to mitigate risk.
18
2.4.4 Efficient Internal Controls, Supervision and Audit To Mitigate Credit Risk
According to Tinsley (2005), organizations that award loans need good intemal control
systems to ensure that funds are properly used and achieve intended results. These
systems, which must be in place prior to grant or loan award, can serve as the basis for
ensuring funds are awarded to eligible entities for intended purposes, and are managed
appropriately. Intemal control systems that are not adequately designed or followed make
it difficult for managers to determine whether funds are properly used (Christen, 2000).
There are four areas where intemal controls are important; Preparing policies and
procedures before issuing loans, consolidating information systems to assist in managing
grants, providing loan management training to staff and grantees and coordinating
programs with similar goals and purposes.
Having regulations and intemal operating procedures in place prior to awarding loans
enables agencies to set clear expectations. Policies serve as guidelines for ensuring that
new loan programs include provisions for holding awarding organizations and grantees
accountable for properly using funds and achieving agreed-upon results (Tinsley, 2005).
Although different programs may need different procedures, general policies should be
established that all programs must follow (Tinsley, 2005).
MFIs should have a segregated intemal audit and control department charged with
conducting audits of all departments the intemal audit should verify the continuing
adequacy and applicability of credit risk management policies and procedures provide an
independent assessment of the credit portfolios' existence, quality and value, the integrity
of the credit process, and promotes detection of problems relating thereto (Tinsley, 2005).
Every year, intemal audit should prepare an auditing plan to be approved by the board
according to which the audits are carried out. This auditing plan should be carried out in a
risk-oriented maimer, taking into account size and nature of the credit institution, as well
as type, volume, complexity, and risk level of the MFI's activities (Kim and Kleiner,
2006).
The frequency of auditing the individual audit areas should be stipulated in the MFI 's
intemal guidelines for intemal auditing. A comprehensive written audit report has to be
19
prepared following each audit. It will usually be expedient to first report to the head of the
audited organizational unit on the audit's findings in the course of a final meeting and to
offer the opportunity to comment on the findings, with these comments to be taken into
account in the audit report. Subsequently, all top executives and department heads are
informed accordingly. It is the task of intemal auditing to monitor the swift correction of
any problems detected in the audit as well as the implementation of its recommendations
in a suitable form, and i f necessary to schedule a follow-up audit (Kim and Kleiner,
2006).
According to Kim and Kleiner (2006), assessments of intemal audit should, at a
minimum, randomly test all aspects of credit risk management in order to determine that;
Credit activities are in compliance with the MFI's credit and accounting policies and
procedures, and with the laws and regulations to which these credit activities are
subjected to, existing credit facilities are duly authorized, and are accurately recorded and
appropriately valued on the books of the MFI , credit exposures are appropriately rated,
credit files are complete, potential problem accounts are being identified on a timely basis
and determine whether the FI 's provision for credit losses is adequate, credit risk
management information reports are adequate and accurate, improvement in the quality of
credit portfolio and appraise top management (Bangladesh Bank, 2005). The following
subsection presents policies and strategies and allocation credit facilities.
2.4.5 Policies and Strategies and Allocation of Credit Facilities
Every MFI should have a credit risk policy document that should include risk
identification, risk measurement, risk grading techniques, reporting and risk control or
mitigation techniques, documentation, legal issues and management of problem facilities
(NBE, 2010). The senior management of the MFI should develop and establish credit
policies and credit administration procedures as a part of overall credit risk management
framework and get those approved from Board. Such policies and procedures shall
provide guidance to the staff on various types of lending including Corporate, SME,
Consumer, Housing etc. Credit risk policies should; Provide detailed and formalized
credit evaluation and appraisal process, provide risk identification, measurement,
monitoring and control, define target markets, risk acceptance criteria, credit approval
20
authority, credit maintenance procedures and guidelines for portfolio management, be
communicated to branch offices. Al l dealing officials should clearly, understand the
MFFs approach for credit sanction and should be held accountable for complying with
established policies and procedures. Clearly spell out roles and responsibilities of units
and staff involved in management of credit in order to be effective, these policies must be
clear and communicated down the line. Further any significant deviation from these
policies must be communicated to the top management and corrective measures should be
taken. It is the responsibility of senior management to ensure effective implementation of
these policies duly approved by the Board (Bangladesh Bank, 2005).
A thorough credit and risk assessment should be conducted prior to the granting of a
facility, and at least annually thereafter for all facilities. The results of this assessment
should be presented in a Credit Application that originates from the relationship manager
or account officer and is reviewed by Credit Risk Management for identification and
probable mitigation of risks. The relationship manager should be the owner of the
customer relationship, and must be held responsible to ensure the accuracy of the entire
credit application submitted for approval. He or she must be familiar with the MFI's
Lending Guidelines and should conduct due diligence on new borrowers, principals, and
guarantors. It is essential that they know their customers and conduct due diligence on
new borrowers, principals, and guarantors to ensure such parties are in fact who they
represent themselves to be. A l l MFI 's should have established Know Your Customer and
Money Laundering guidelines which should be adhered to at all times (Bangladesh Bank,
2005).
2.5 Chapter Summary
The purpose of this chapter was to determine and identify the challenges faced by micro
finance institutions in credit management in Kenya This chapter addressed the espousing
factors to credit risk among microfinance institutions, the relationship between credit
management policy and customer retention and the guiding principles and practices can
be used to manage credit risk in microfinance institutions. The following chapter presents
the research methodology to be used in the study.
21
CHAPTER T H R E E
3.0 METHODOLOGY
3.1 Introduction
The objective of this research was to determine the challenges microfinance institutions
face in credit management. This chapter addresses the research design that was employed
in the study. It discusses the research design, population and sample, data collection,
research procedure and data analysis methods. A summary of the chapter wil l be provided
at the end.
3.2 Research Design
Bums and Groove (2001) state that designing a study helps researches to plan and
implement the study in a way that will help them obtain the intended results. This
increased the chances of obtaining information that could be associated with the real
situation. The research design employed in the study was descriptive survey which
enabled the researcher to present variables under investigation. The study was conducted
in natural settings and sought to retrieve the information from the respondent. It involved
a small sample of total population. Using the research methods mentioned above, the
researcher was able to obtain information on the challenges that MFIs face in credit
management in Kenya.
3.3 Population and Sampling
3.3.1 Population
Population refers to the entire group of people, events or things of interest that the
researcher wishes to investigate (Saunders, Lewis and Thomhill, 2009). Fifty four MFIs
in Kenya were identified for data collection. Cooper and Schindler (2008) define a
population as the total of the elements (an element is the subject on which measurement is
being taken) upon which inferences can be made. The study focused on the population
that is located in Nairobi comprising of all licensed MFIs offering products and services
to their customers. The study population consisted of all MFIs currently operating in
Kenya, there are fifty four MFIs currently operating in Kenya and registered as members
of the Association of Microfinance Institutions in Kenya (AMFI-K) . The MFIs were
specific to those that are located in Nairobi and had operations in rural areas of Central
22
Kenya. The Microfinance Institutions had to be issuing credit to either groups or
individuals in Kenya. The MFIs were either receiving deposits or were pure credit.
3.3.2 Sampling Design
According to Ross Kenneth (2005), sampling design is generally conducted in order to
permit the detailed study of part rather than the whole population. The information
derived from the resulting sample is customarily employed to develop useful
generalizations about the population. These generalizations may be in the form of
estimates of one or more characteristics associated with the population, or they may be
concerned with estimates of the strength of relationships between characteristics within
the population. The researcher wil l only focus on MFIs in Nairobi.
3.3.2.1 Sampling Frame
Sampling frame can be defined as the list of elements from which the sample was actually
drawn from (Cooper & Schindler, 2000). It is also knovra as the working population. The
sampling frame was the list of members of the Association of Microfinance Institutions in
Kenya (AMFI-K) which can be sourced from their website.
3.3.2.2 Sampling Technique
The study employed a census survey approach and as such, all the fifty three MFIs in the
population were studied. This means that all the MFIs were approached to participate in
the study. The choice for census is based on the fact that the entire population is
sufficiently small with only 54 MFIs. The census method has an advantage in that it
helped obtain data from each of the companies which then provided greater accuracy and
reliability.
3.3.2.3 Sampling Size
According to Cheston (2002), sample size depends on projects, project purpose, project
complexity, amount of errors willing to be tolerated, time constraints, financial
constraints and previous research in the areas. The choice for census is based on the fact
that the entire population is sufficiently small with only 53 MFIs. The census method has
an advantage in that it helped obtain data from each of the companies which then
provided greater accuracy and reliability.
23
3.4 Data Collection Methods
Data collection is an important aspect of any study type of research study. Inaccurate data
collection can impact negatively on the study and leads to invalid results. This study used
both primary data and secondary data. The research instrument used in collection of
primary data was questionnaires. The questionnaires were administered to ensure that
detailed and in depth information was generated through probing the respondent. The
questionnaires were then pre-set in order to remove any error and omissions. The
secondary data was obtained from various library books, referenced journals, research
papers and various websites regarding MFIs and credit management.
3.5 Research Procedures
Before the actually administering the questiormaire, a pilot study was done to ensure that
all questions were clear and understandable. The pilot study was administered to the
senior officers of two MFIs and revision of the questionnaire done accordingly. After
revisions on the questionnaires, they were administered via email as well as through drop
and pick to the respondents. In order to ensure a favourable response rate, the
questionnaire was issued with a cover letter that explained how the respondents were
chosen, anonymity of the identity of the respondents and a surety of sharing the results of
the research. This process took two weeks.
3.6 Data Analysis Methods
After data was collected it was prepared before being analyzed. The data was edited to do
away with omissions, improve legibility and consistency and coding was appropriately
done so as to assist in interpreting, classifying and recording of data. Tabulation was the
form in which data was recorded and categorized in order for it to be analyzed.
Data analysis was done through descriptive and regression statistics. This included
percentages, frequencies, and regression tables. Data was presented in pictorial
representation in the form of tables and figures. The tool that was used for analysis of
data collected was Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS).
24
3.7 Chapter Summary
The chapter explains the research methodology used the population and the sample size,
so as to the give accurate information. The research design employed in the study was
descriptive survey which enabled the researcher to present variables under investigation.
It explains the data collection methods and tools. Data analysis was done through
descriptive and regression statistics. This included percentages, frequencies, and
regression tables. Data was presented in pictorial representation in the form of tables and
figures. The next chapter will help evaluate the findings, conclusions and give the
appropriate recommendations which will be based on this chapter.
25
CHAPTER FOUR
4.0 DATA ANALYSIS AND PRESENTATION
4.1 Introduction
This chapter presents the results and findings of the study on the research questions with
regards to the data collected from the MFIs in Kenya. The initial section covers the
background information with respect to the respondent as well as the company
background that relates to MFIs. This was to enable the researcher to know the nature and
type of the MFI , while the second was on the exposing factors to credit risk among
microfinance institutions. The third section was on the relationship between credit
management policy and customer retention and the fourth section was on the guiding
principles and practices that can be used to manage credit risk in microfinance
institutions. ^
4.2 Background Information
This section offers the backgroimd information with regards to the respondents' gender,
level of education as well as the experience in the industry. This was put into
consideration because of the meaningful contribution it offers to the study as the variables
help to provide the logic behind the responses issued by the respective respondents. Fifty
four questiormaires were issued to the respondents out of this, fifty three were returned.
This indicated a 97% response rate.
4.2.1 Position in the Company
Table 4.1 provides a summary of the study findings with regards to the respondents'
position in their respective organizations.
Table 4.1 Position in the Company
Position in the Company Distribution
Frequency Percent Risk Manager 5 10
Credit Control Manager 43 80 General Manager 5 10 Other 0 0
Total 53 100.0
26
Whereas 80 % of the respondents were in the credit control management only 10 % of the
respondents were either risk managers or general managers. None of the respondents
were from the other categories. The study findings show that indeed, the respondents
were directly involved in the strategic decision making by these organizations and
therefore likely to provide first-hand information on the variables of the study.
4.2.2 Years in Existence
In order to establish the experience of the respondents in the micro-finance industry, the
respondents were asked to state how long the company has been in the industry. Table 4.2
provides a summary of the findings in this regard.
Table 4.2: Years in Existence
Years in Existence Distribution
Frequency Percent
Less than 5 Years 12 22
6-10 24 47
11-15 14 27
16 years and Above 2 4
Total 53 100.0
Whereas 22 % of them have been in the micro fmance industry for less than 5 years, the
majority of the respondents have been in the industry more than 5 years. Specifically, 47
% of the respondents have been existing between 6-10 years, while 27 % of the between
11-15 years of existence. Also 4 % of the respondents have 16 years and above in terms
of existence in the micro fmance industry. Given many years of respondents' experience
in micro finance, as such they were equipped with the knowledge of the market dynamics
in Kenya.
4.2.3 Type of Loan
Figiu-e 4.1, presents a summary of the findings with regard to the type of loans issued by
the various responding firms.
27
0% — f
Individual Group Both
Figure 4.1: Type of Loans
As seen in figure 4.1, the majority of the firms offered both group and individual type of
loans, similarly 31 %, offered individual loans, while 25 % offered group loans.
4.3 Exposing Factors to Credit Risli among Microfinance Institutions
The first objective of the study was to establish the exposing factors to credit risk among
microfinance institutions. Figure 4.2 presents a summary of the findings with regards to
the extent to which these factors affect credit risk among microfinance institutions.
70% •
60% -
50%
40%
30% j
20%
10%
0%
60% 5S%
51% 52%
High
Moderate
NO" J -
\
|OW
Neutral
Figure 4.2: Exposing Factors to Credit Risk among Microfinance Institutions
28
As seen in figure 4.2, it is evident that there are various exposing factors to credit risk
among microfinance institutions in Kenya. Specifically, the majority of the respondents
were of the opinion that loans to individuals, highly contributed to credit risk, followed by
involvement in foreign exchange trade, operational risk, prevailing inflation rates,
prevailing interest rates group loans and finally, investment in bonds and equities. This
implies that indeed issuance of loans to individuals is highly risk as compared to groups.
It also implies that investment bonds and equities are less risky.
4.3.1 Loans to Groups
As seen in figure 4.3, 35 % of the respondents regard loans to groups as being highly
risky, 38 % moderate, 32 % low, while 5 % remained neutral.
High Moderate Low Neutral
Figure 4.3: Loans to Groups
4.3.2 Loans to Individuals
As seen in figure 4.4, 60 % of the respondents regard loans to individuals as being highly
risky, 11 % moderate, 6 % low, while 13 % remained neutral.
29
10%
0% . ^ - O ^
High Moderate Low Neutral
Figure 4.4: Loans to Individuals
4.3.3 Operation Risk
As seen in figure 4.5, 52 % of the respondents regard operations as being highly risky,
37% moderate, 5 % low, while 6 % remained neutral.
High Moderate Low Neutral
Figure 4.5: Operation Risk
30
4.3.4 Investment in Bonds
Figure 4.6, shows that 33 % of the respondents regard investment in bonds as being
highly risky, 21 % moderate, 41 % low, while 5 % remained neutral.
High Moderate Low Neutral
Figure 4.6: Investment in Bonds
4.3.5 Prevailing Interest Rates
Figure 4.7, shows that 51 % of the respondents regard prevailing interest rates as being
highly risky, 38 % moderate, 5 % low, while 11 % remained neutral.
6 0 %
'— l̂ilttiiii 5 0 % -
4 0 % -
3 0 % -
2 0 % -
i o % -. . ^
o% High Moderate Low Neutral
Figure 4.7: Prevailing Interest Rates
31
4.3.5 Prevailing Inflation Rates
Figure 4.8, reveals that 55 % of the respondents regard prevailing interest rates as being
highly risky, 22 % moderate, 8 % low, while 15 % remained neutral.
60'X> -
5 0 % - " "
4 0 % - "" '
High Moderate Low Neutral
Figure 4.8: Prevailing Inflation Rates
4.3.6 Involvement in Foreign Exchange Trade
Figure 4.9, reveals that 56 % of the respondents regard involvement in foreign exchange
trade as being highly risky, 28 % moderate, 10 % low, while 6 % remained neutral.
High M o d e r a t e L o w Neutral
Figure 4.9: Prevailing Inflation Rates
32
4.4 Relationship between Credit Management Policy and Customer Retention
The second objective of the study was to establish the relationship between credit
management policy and customer retention. The following subsection presents a
summary of the findings in this regard.
Credit time and duration issued are
dependent on the loan type
The interest rates are competitively set
compared to other MFIs
Managers establish long-term business
relationship with customers through
continued communication
Credit officers verify information
provided by the loan applicant each
time
Customers are frequently trained on the
different products offered by the MFI
Repeat customers are asked for
collateral security each time they get a
loan
• Strongly Disagree
• Disagree
it Neutral
• Agree
• Strongly Agree
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
Figure 4.10: Relationship between Credit Management Policy and Customer Retention
As seen in figure 4.10, it is evident that indeed majority of the respondent agree on the
various credit management policy measures by the MFIs. Specifically it was revealed that
78 % of the respondents agree that repeat customers are asked for collateral security each
time they get a loan. Likewise 66 % of the respondents agree that customers are
frequently trained on the different products offered by the MFI . In the same regard, 64 %
of the respondents agree that credit officers verify information provided by the loan
applicant each time. Additionally 65 % agree that managers establish long-term business
relationship with customers through continued communication, while 68 % agree that the
interest rates are competitively set compared to other MFIs. Finally 90 % of the
respondents agree that credit time and duration issued are dependent on the loan type.
These findings imply that indeed, MFIs do not discriminate among different customers
33
when it comes to credit policy measures. However, MFIs seek continued customer
relations in order to enhance customer retention.
In order to test the relationship between relationship between credit management policy
and customer retention, the following regression equation was used.
YR—C+5X credit management policy
Table 4.3: Relationship between Credit Management Policy and Customer Retention
Coefficients"
Unstandardized Standardized
Coefficients Coefficients
Model B Std. Error Beta T Sig.
1 (Constant) 1.976 4.638 24.575 .000
CRP .719 .005 .578 28.5 .000
a. Dependent Variable:
Customer Retention
As shown from table 4.3 regression model equation is expressed as:
Y =1.976+0.719 Customer retention.
This indicates that indeed credit management policy has a positive relationship with
customer retention at 0.05, indicating that although credit management policies are aimed
at reducing credit risks and safeguarding the MFIs, such policies augur well with frequent
customers who prefer less strict measures when requesting for loans from MFIs,
especially i f such.
4.5 Guiding Principles and Practices to Manage Credit Risk
The third and final objective of the study was to establish the guiding principles and
practices to manage credit risk.
34
4.5.1 Credit Control Policy Implemented Determines Risk Exposure
Figure 4.11 presents a summary of the findings with regards to the credit control policy
implemented which helps determines the risk exposure. As seen in the figure, 52 % of the
respondents strongly agree, 32 % of the respondents agree, 6 % of the respondents
strongly disagree and 4 % of the respondents disagree while 6 % of the respondents are
uncertain that the credit control policy implemented determines the risk exposure.
Figure 4.11: Credit Control Policy Implemented Determines Risk Exposure
4.5.2 Oversight of MFIs by senior management would help Reduce Risk
Figure 4.12 presents a summary of the findings with regards to oversight of MFIs by
active board and senior management would help reduce risk. 50 % of the respondents
strongly agree, 36 % of the respondents agree, 6 % of the respondents strongly disagree
and 2 % of the respondents disagree while 6 % of the respondents are uncertain with
regards to oversight of MFIs by active board and senior management would help reduce
risk.
35
strongly Agree
Disagree p^^w6
Strongly Disagree IB2
Figure 4.12: Oversight of MFIs by senior management would help Reduce Risk
4.5.3 Management Information System adopted by an MFI helps in Risk Reduction
Figure 4.13, presents a summary of the findings with regards to how the Management
Information System adopted by an MFI helps in risk reduction. 35 % of the respondents
strongly agree 28 % of the respondents agree, 14 % of the respondents strongly disagree
and 10 % of the respondents disagree while 13% of the respondents are uncertain about
how The Management Information System adopted by an MFI helps in risk reduction.
• Strongly Disagree
• Disagree
• Uncertain
• Agree
• Strongly Agree
Figure 4.13: Management Information System adopted by an MFI helps in Risk Reduction
36
4.5.4 Maintaining an Appropriate Credit Administration and Monitoring of
Customers helps Reduce on Risk
Figure 4.14 presents a summary of the findings with regards to how maintaining an
appropriate credit administration and monitoring of customers helps reduce on risk. 52 %
of the respondents strongly agree, 24 agree, 8 % strongly disagree, 4 % disagree, while 12
% are uncertain that maintaining an appropriate credit administration and monitoring of
customers helps reduce on risk.
Figure 4.14: Maintaining an Appropriate Credit Administration
4.5.5 Efficient Internal Controls, Supervision and Audit are Adequate To Mitigate
Credit Risk
Figure 4.15, presents a summary of the findings with regards to how efficient intemal
controls, supervision and audit are adequate to mitigate credit risk. As clearly seen, 36 %
of the respondents strongly agree, 20 % of the respondents agree, 6 % of the respondents
strongly disagree, and 10 % of the respondents disagree while 28 % of the respondents
are uncertain that efficient intemal controls, supervision and audit are adequate to
mifigate credit risk.
i Strongly Agree
• Strongly Disagree
• Disagree
• Uncertain
I Agree
37
Figure 4.15: Efficient Internal Controls, Supervision and Audit
4.6 Chapter Summary
In this chapter, results and findings based on the specific objectives were presented in
form of pie charts, tables and figures as well as graphs. Chapter five provides a detailed
discussion of the results and findings. The following section provides conclusions as well
as recommendations for improvement on each specific objective and recommendations
for further studies.
38
CHAPTER F I V E
5.0 DISCUSSION, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 Introduction
This chapter consists of four sections, namely summary, discussion, conclusions, and
recommendations following that order. The initial section provides a summary of the
important elements of the study which includes the study objectives, methodology and the
findings. The following subsequent section discusses the major findings of the study with
regards to the specific objectives. Section three discusses the conclusions based on the
specific objectives, while using the findings and results which are obtained in the fourth
chapter. The last sub-section provides the recommendations for improvement based on
the specific objectives. It also provides the recommendations for further studies.
5.2 Summary ^
The main purpose of this research was to determine and identify the challenges faced by
micro finance institutions in credit management in Kenya. The study was guided by the
following research questions: What are the exposing factors to credit risk among
microfinance institutions? What is the relationship between credit management policy and
customer retention? What are the guiding principles and practices that can be used to
manage credit risk in microfinance institutions?
In order to achieve the above, the study adopted a descriptive survey research design in
order to obtain the data that was necessary, which in essence facilitated the collection of
the private data as a way of getting into the research objectives. The population under
study was fifty four micro finance institutions, the respondent being employees of these
institutions. The collection of the private data was done using structured questionnaires
that were pilot tested in order to ensure that there was reliability as well as validity. The
coding of the data was done with the use of Microsoft Excel as well as SPSS in order to
generate the descriptive statistics for instance frequencies and percentages.
Data analysis was done through descriptive and regression statistics. This included
percentages, frequencies, and regression tables. Data was presented in pictorial
representation in the form of tables and figures. The tool that was used for analysis of
data collected was the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS).
39
The study findings revealed that there are various exposing factors to credit risk among
microfinance institutions in Kenya. Specifically, the majority of the respondents were of
the opinion that loans to individuals, highly contributed to credit risk, followed by
involvement in foreign exchange trade, operational risk, prevailing inflation rates,
prevailing interest rates group loans and finally, investment in bonds and equities. This
implies that indeed issuance of loans to individuals is highly risk as compared to groups.
It also implies that investment bonds and equities are less risky.
Additionally it was revealed that there is a positive relationship between credit
management policy measures and customer retention. Similarly the majority of the
respondents agree on the various credit management policy measures by the MFIs.
Specifically it was revealed that 78 % of the respondents agree that repeat customers are
asked for collateral security each time they get a loan. Similarly 66 % of the respondents
agree that customers are frequently trained on the different products offered by the MFI .
In the same regard, 64 % of the respondents agree that credit officers verify information
provided by the loan applicant each time. Additionally 65 % agree that managers
establish long-term business relationship with customers through continued
communication, while 68 % agree that the interest rates are competitively set compared to
other MFIs. Finally 90 % of the respondents agree that credit time and duration issued are
dependent on the loan type. These findings imply that indeed, MFIs do not discriminate
among different customers when it comes to credit policy measures. However, MFIs seek
continued customer relations in order to enhance customer retention. This indicates that
indeed credit management policy has a positive relationship with customer retention at
0.05, indicating that although credit management policies are aimed at reducing credit
risks and safeguarding the MFIs, such policies augur well with frequent customers who
prefer less strict measures when requesting for loans from MFIs, especially i f such.
The study also revealed that the credit control policy implemented determines the risk
exposure. It was also revealed that the Management Information System adopted by an
MFI helps in risk reduction. Fureth maintaining an appropriate credit administration and
monitoring of customers helps reduce on risk. Finally, it was revealed that efficient
intemal controls, supervision and audit are adequate to mitigate credit risk.
40
5.3 Discussion
5.3.1 Exposing Factors to Credit Risk among Microfinance Institutions
The study findings reveled that there are various exposing factors to credit risk among
microfinance institutions in Kenya. Specifically, 60 % of the respondents were of the
opinion that loans to individuals, highly contributed to credit risk. According to Ogilo
(2012), financial institutions have faced difficulties over the years for a multitude of
reasons, the major cause of serious banking problems continues to be directly related to
lax credit standards for borrowers and counterparties, poor portfolio risk management or a
lack of attention to changes in economic or other circumstances that can lead to a
deterioration in the credit standing of a bank's counterparties.
For most banks and MFIs, loans are the largest and most obvious source of credit risk
however, other sources of credit risk exist throughout the activities of a bank, including in
the banking book and in the trading book, and both on and off the balance sheet. Banks
and FMIs are increasingly facing credit risk (or counterparty risk) in various financial
instruments other than loans, including acceptances, interbank transactions, trade
financing, foreign exchange transactions, financial fiitures, swaps, bonds, equities,
options, and in the extension of commitments and guarantees, and the settlement of
transactions
The study further revealed that 56 % of the respondents believe that involvement in
foreign exchange trade highly contributed to credit risk. This finding affirms that indeed
foreign exchange risk is the potential for loss of eamings or capital resulting from
fluctuations in currency values. Microfinance institutions most often experience foreign
exchange risk when they borrow or mobilize savings in one currency and lend in another.
For example, MFIs that offer dollar savings accounts and lend in the local currency risk
financial loss i f the value of the local currency weakens against the dollar. Altematively,
i f the local currency strengthens against the dollar, the MFI experiences a financial gain.
Due to the potential severity of the downside risk, an MFI should avoid funding the loan
portfolio with foreign currency unless it can match its foreign liabilities with foreign
assets of equivalent duration and maturity (Steinwand, 2000).
The study also revealed that 52 % of the respondents believe that operational risk highly
contributed to credit risk. Indeed common operational risks in MFIs include the
41
following: The system does not correctly reflect loan tracking, e.g. information on
amount disbursed, payment received, current status of outstanding balance, aging of loan
by portfolio outstanding etc. (Peace, 2011). Lack of effectiveness and insecurity of
management information system in general and the portfolio management system in
particular e.g. software does not have intemal safety features, inaccurate MIS and
untimely reports; Inconsistencies between the loan management system data and the
accounting system data; Treating rescheduled loan as on-site loans; Lack of portfolio
related fraud controls; Loan tracking information is not adequate. The most important
types of operational risk could also involve breakdowns in intemal systems and controls
and corporate govemance. Such breakdowns can often lead to financial losses through
error, fraud or inefficiency. Other aspects of operational risk include major failure of
information technology systems or events such as natural and other disasters. As
microfinance institutions become more reliant on technology to support various aspects of
their operations, the potential failure of a technology based system is of growing concem
in the context of the management of operational risk (NBE, 2010).
Finally, it was revealed that, prevailing inflation rates, prevailing interest rates group
loans as well as, investment in bonds and equities highly contribute to credit risk among
microfinance institutions in Kenya. Watkins and Hicks (2009), indicate that microfinance
institutions have become an integral part in the financial market by making microloans to
low-income borrowers mostly in the developing and transition economies. Microfinance
has been argued to charge high interest rates to ensure that their organizations are
financially sustainable. The two place arguments that by doing so, microfinance
institutions ensure permanence and expansion of the services they provide. Yehuala
(2008), concurring that microfinance charges higher interest rates, notes that loan size
rather than interest charged is what is relevant in making loan acquisition decision. Loan
provided by formal financial institutions is usually small, due to the risk averseness, and a
gap is created which is filled by accessing money from private lenders at a higher interest
rate (NBE, 2010). However, Peace (2011), contradicts that position by stafing that interest
rate is a relevant factor in loan acquisition decision as it is set by institutions to sort
potential borrowers.
42
5.3.2 Relationship between Credit Management Policy and Customer Retention
The study revealed that there is a positive relationship between credit management policy
measures and customer retention. These findings affirm the argument by Ralston and
Wright (2003), attracting and retaining profitable customers, and increasing reviews from
those customers are a priority of managers of all firms in today's globalised marketplace.
It is particularly important in the highly competitive retail financial services market where
the core business of banking continues to be the profitable management of risk. For banks
and other financial services firms, risk management is consistent with their profit
maximizing objectives which is evidenced by provision of tailor made products and
personal loan packages to profitable low income customers (Peace, 2011). Additionally
customer retention facilitates outreach by improving efficiency and enhancing
productivity as repeat borrowers with good repayment records require less time to
manage than new clients. This effect of improved efficiency is helpfiil to MFIs serving
the lower market segment because of compensation for the small loan balances given out.
Likewise retained customers reduce the lending risks due to the fact that sufficient
information is built on their cash flows and business performance which facilitates MFIs
to make optimal credit decisions while modifying the lending terms as per the identified
risks (Micro save, 2010).
Similarly majority of the respondents agreed on the various credit management policy
measures by the MFIs. Specifically it was revealed that 78 % of the respondents agree
that repeat customers are asked for collateral security each time they get a loan. This need
not be the case given that repeat customers have already furnished the MFIs of their
collateral securities.
Similarly 66 % of the respondents agreed that customers are frequently trained on the
different products offered by the MFI. Indeed many micro lending methodologies use
peer groups, restrictive product terms and compulsory savings as collateral substitutes
(peace, 2011). Subsequent lending innovations provide microloans with non-traditional
collateral, such as household assets and consigners'. Pawn lending and asset leasing are
other methods of overcoming collateral constraints. Perhaps more important than the type
of collateral is how it is used. In microfinance, collateral is primarily employed as an
indication of the applicant's commitment. It is rarely used as a secondary repayment
43
source because the outstanding balance is so small that it is not cost-effective to liquidate
the collateral, much less legally register it i f such a service is available (NBE, 2010). Only
when clients are not acting in good faith do micro lenders take a hard line stance and
seize collateral. Consequently, MFIs tend to be less concerned about the ratio of the loan
size to the value of collateral than how the clients would feel i f the collateral was taken
from them (Simeyo et al., 2011). As the loan size increases, however, this soft approach
to collateral needs to change so those larger loans are indeed backed by appropriate
security (Churchill and Coster, 2001).
In the same regard, 64 % of the respondents agreed that credit officers verify information
provided by the loan applicant each time. According to Christl and Pribil (2004) that
evaluation of the collateral provided by the credit applicant is an essential element in the
credit approval process and thus has an impact on the overall assessment of the credit risk
involved in a possible exposure. The main feature of a collateralized credit is not only the
borrowers personal credit standing, which basically determines the probability of default,
but the collateral which the lender can realize in case the customer defaults and which
thus deter-mines the MFIs loss (Tinsely, 2005).
Additionally 65 % agree that managers establish long-term business relationships with
customers through continued communication, while 68 % agree that the interest rates are
competitively set compared to other MFIs.. What customers experience day by day in
contacts they have with each branch office or call centre determines the quality of the on
going relationship. For clear account statements, an orderly branch appearance and easy
to understand product information which can be thought of as "hygiene factors"
customers expect execution to be error-free (or that, in its breach, the bank will make
promptly acknowledge its mistake and work to regain the customer's good will). Thus,
many banks need to invest in improving basic processes first before they can begin
exceeding customer expectations (Symonds, Wright and Ott, 2007).
Converting customers into loyalists and, even better, making them recruiters of more
customers requires a disciplined, multiyear initiative. The process of becoming a
customer-led bank begins with a commitment to eliminate self-defeating behaviours that
blind the organization to customers' needs (Yunus, 2003). Putting customer loyalty at the
heart of growth requires banks to master new disciplines. They must learn to nurture the
44
loyal core of their customer base and hone skills for spotting and attracting the right new
customers. Retail bank executives across the world are awakening to the realization that
long-term growth and profitability hinge on their ability to attract and retain loyal
customers. That recognition has been a long time in coming. It's being spurred by a
potent combination of increasing competition, regulatory scrutiny and customers' easier
access to a broad range of new products and services and thus MFIs should adapt these
practices.
5.3.3 Guiding Principles and Practices That Can Be Used To Manage Credit Risk
The study also revealed that the credit control policy implemented determines the risk
exposure. A number of techniques are available to microfinance institutions to assist in
the mitigation of credit risk. Group collateral and guarantees are the most commonly
used. Various forms of other collateral and guarantees (Including physical collateral,
personal guarantees etc.) could also be used. Notwithstanding the use of various
mitigation techniques individual credits transactions should be entered into primarily on
the strength of the borrower's repayment capacity (Yunus, 2003). Microfinance
institutions should also be mindful that the value of collateral might well be impaired by
the same factors that have led to the diminished recoverability of the credit (NBE, 2010).
Microfinance institutions should have policies covering the acceptability of various forms
of collateral, procedures for the ingoing valuation of such collateral, and a process to
ensure that collateral is, and continues to be enforceable and realizable. With regard to
guarantees, microfinance institutions should evaluate the level of coverage being
provided in relation to the credit-quality and legal capacity of the guarantor and should be
careful when making assumptions about implied support from third parties including
government entities (NBE,2010).
It was also revealed that the Management Information System adopted by an MFI helps in
risk reduction. Good MIS assists MFI 's maximize their outreach to the poor so that
economies of scale can be enjoyed fially. Appropriate MIS goes a long way to assist
programs with an easy way to analyse data for improving their program design and to
assist in the development of products that are geared to meeting the needs of the people
(Christen, 2000). According to Gibbons (2000) there is a need to improve the capacity of
programs to handle greater responsibilities and be able to control greater amounts of
45
funds. He says it is important for programs to update and improve other essential systems
as well, like computerized MIS and planning with the micro finance so as to give
management the tools they need.
Further maintaining an appropriate credit administration and monitoring of customers
helps reduce on risk. Finally, it was revealed that efficient intemal controls, supervision
and audit are adequate to mifigate credit risk. Having regulations and intemal operating
procedures in place prior to awarding loans enables agencies to set clear expectations.
Policies serve as guidelines for ensuring that new loan programs include provisions for
holding awarding organizations and grantees accountable for properly using funds and
achieving agreed-upon results. Although different programs may need different
procedures, general policies should be established that all programs must follow (Tinsley,
2005) . MFIs should have a segregated intemal audit and control department charged with
conducting audits of all departments the intemal audit should verify the continuing
adequacy and applicability of credit risk management policies and procedures provide an
independent assessment of the credit portfolios' existence, quality and value, the integrity
of the credit process, and promotes detection of problems relating thereto (Tinsley, 2005).
Every year, intemal audit should prepare an auditing plan to be approved by the board
according to which the audits are carried out. This auditing plan should be carried out in a
risk-oriented maimer, taking into account size and nature of the credit institution, as well
as type, volume, complexity, and risk level of the MFI's activities (Kim and Kleiner,
2006) .
5.4 Conclusions
The following subsection presents a detailed conclusion on the findings of the study on
the basis of each research question that the study sought to answer.
5.4.1 Exposing Factors to Credit Risk among Microfinance Institutions
The study concludes that there are various exposing factors to credit risk among
microfinance institutions in Kenya. Specifically, loans to individuals, highly contributed
to credit risk, followed by involvement in foreign exchange trade, operational risk,
prevailing inflation rates, prevailing interest rates group loans and finally, investment in
bonds and equities. This implies that indeed issuance of loans to individuals is highly risk
46
as compared to groups. It also implies that investment bonds and equities are less risky
and rarely used by MFIs.
5.4.2 Relationship between Credit Management Policy and Customer Retention
The study concludes that there is a positive relationship between credit management
policy measures and customer retention. Similarly majority of the respondent agree on the
various credit management policy measures by the MFIs. Specifically it was concluded
that repeat customers are asked for collateral security each time they get a loan. Similarly
customers are frequently trained on the different products offered by the MFI . In the same
regard, credit officers verify information provided by the loan applicant each time.
Additionally managers establish long-term business relationship with customers through
continued communication, while interest rates are competitively set compared to other
MFIs. Finally credit time and duration issued are dependent on the loan type. The study
therefore concludes that, MFIs do not discriminate among different customers when it
comes to credit policy measures. However, MFIs seek continued customer relations in
order to enhance customer retention
5.4.3 Guiding Principles and Practices That Can Be Used To Manage Credit Risk
In light of the findings, it can be concluded that the credit control policy implemented
determines the risk exposure. It can also be concluded that the Management Information
System adopted by an MFI helps in risk reduction. Fureth maintaining an appropriate
credit administration and monitoring of customers helps reduce on risk. Finally, it can be
concluded that efficient intemal controls, supervision and audit are adequate to mitigate
credit risk.
5.5 Recommendations
This section gives recommendations that the researcher indeed feels i f applied by MFIs
then they wil l form a very essential aspect in formulating guidelines for micro finance in
Kenya.
47
5.5.1 Recommendations for Improvement
5.5.1.1 Exposing Factors to Credit Risli among Microfinance Institutions
In light of the findings on this objective, the study recommends that officials should be
able to identify the inadequacy of collateral security/equitable mortgage against loan. The
insfitutions should review the unrealistic terms and schedule of repayment. The institution
should also impose proper follow up measures to ensure that clients use loans for purpose
approved for.
5.5.1.2 Relationship between Credit Management Policy and Customer Retention
The study recommends that since poor customers generally have no credit history and
little collateral, MFIs management must use innovative lending practices to reduce risks
associated with asymmetric information between lender and borrower. The best way to
retain these customers is upon the manager's initiative in developing voluntary savings
products where customers save money which can be helpful for MFIs in mobilizing
savings to lend out at low cost compared to the market.
5.5.1.3 Guiding Principles and Practices That Can Be Used To Manage Credit Risk
The study recommends the setting up of bases locally, value addition, government
intervention, provision of leadership by development financial institutions and training of
micro finance managers as the way forward for MFIs in Kenya. This should be carried
out in collaboration with respecitve ministries. Further the study recommends that
entrepreneurs should address labor problems in the market. Also proper measures like
insurance covers should be taken against natural calamities.
48
R E F E R E N C E S
Abdou,H. A. & Pointon, J . (2009). Credit scoring and decision making in Egyptian Public sector banks: International Journal of Managerial Finance. Vol 5, Iss.4 pp391-407
Aemiro,T. (201 l).The financial perft)rmance and sustainability of microfinance institutions during the current financial crisis: International Journal of Business and Public Management .Vol. 2, Issue 2, pp 81-87.
Ahamed, R. (2010).Microfinance insfitutions in developing countries. Journal of microfinance Services,Vo\. 9 No. 1, pp 4.
Alexis, M. (2010). Enhancing outreach extensions in FINCA: International journal of credit Policy. Vol 2, No 6, ppl I
Bangladesh Bank (2005). Managing core risk of financial institufions: Credit Risk Management. Bangladesh Bank.
Christen, R. (July, 2013).From the Chair, Micro Banking Bulletin, Available online at www.calmeadow.com
Churchill, C. & Coster, D. (200\).Microfinance Risk Management Handbook. Washington DC: The Microfinance Network.
Clark,M. (2010), Retaining customers using a variety of services ,a challenge for microfinance. Training manual for microfince institutions. Credit manual 2009 Post Bank credit manual
Cook, P. and F. Nixson, 2000.Finance and Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Development. Finance and Development ResearchProgramme .Working Paper Series, Paper No 14.
Craig, R. (2010). Efficiency, customer service and financial institutions: journal of marketing Vol.13 No 1, pp 3
Dawkin, S. (2010). Micro finances double bottom line, the relationship lending
constructs: Journal of Microfinance Vol 1 No 7 pp5
Dessler,G.(2000).Management: leading People and Organization in the 21st century. NJ: Prentice Hall.
Dixon,R., Ritchie,J.,& Siwale,J.(2006).Accountability fi-om the grassroots: Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal.Wol.\9,lss 3 pp 405-427.
Fatemi, A. & Fooladi, I . (2006).Credit risk Management: Managerial F/«a«e.Vol.32,Iss.3,pp 227-233.
49
Ferber, F. (2009).Managers mistake in decision making, the top management dilemma: Journal of Management Vol 11 No 2 pp. 32
Gama, A. P.M & Geraldes, H. A (2012). Credit risk assessment and the impact of the New Basel Caital Accord on small and medium-sized enterprises: An empirical analysis: Management Research Review. Vol 35, Iss.8 pp 727-750
Gibbons,D. (July,2013). Serving the poorest sustainably. Micro Banking Bulletin, Available online at w^-w.calmeadow.com
Green et al., (2006).Finance for Small Enteiprise Growth and poverty reduction in Developing countries: Journal of International Development Vol 18, pp 1017-1030.
Harris, y[.{20Q\).Management decisions; Evans publishers ,London
Hartarska,V. ,Gropper, D.M & Caudill, S.B. (2012). Mircofmance Institutions Costs: effects of gender, subsidies and technology.' Journal of Financial Economic Policy. Vol.4 Iss.4 pp292-305
Kim, S. & Kleiner, B . H. (1996). Service excellence in the banking industry: Managing Service Quality. Vol.6.IssI pp 22-28
Mwobobia, F.M, (2012).The Challenges Facing Small-Scale Women Entrepreneurs: International Journal of Business Administration Vol. 3, Issue 2, pp 113.
National Bank of Ethiopia (2010). Micro fmance Institutions Supervision Directorate: Risk Management Guidelines for Micro fmance Institutions. NBE, Ethiopia.
Ogilo, F. (2012). The impact of credit risk management on financial performance of Commercial Banks in Kenya: Z)5v4 Management Review. Vol. 3, No.l, pp. 22-37
Peace, K . ( 2011), Small Savings And Credit Schemes And Financial Accessibility In Rural Areas: A Case Study Of Mitaana Sacco In Rukungiri District
Ralston, D & Wright, A. (2003). Lending procedures and the visibility-social objectives conflict in credit unions: International Journal of Bank Marketing. Vol. 21, Iss6/7, pp.304-311
Richard,E., Chijoriga, M., Kaijage, E . , Peterson, C , & Bohman,H. (2008).Credit risk management systems of a commercial bank in Tanzania: International journal of Emerging markets.Vo\.2), Iss.3,pp323-332.
Robinson, P. (2001).Govemment Accountability and Performance Measurement .Journal of Critical Perspectives on Accountability, Vol 14 pp. 171-86.
Rosenberg, R. (1999). Measuring Microcredit Delinquency: Rafios Can Be Harmful to Your Health," occasional Paper No. 03, CGAP.
50
Simeyo et al. (2011) .Effect of provision of micro finance on the performance of micro enterprises: African Journal of Business Management Vol. 5, lssue20, pp 8290-8300.
Symonds, M., Wright, T. & Ott, J . (2007). The customer-led bank: How to retain Customers and boost top-line growth.- Journal of Business Strategy. Vol.28. Iss 6 pp4-13
Tamil, J . (2010).Customer retention in retail financial services: An employee perspective ,Vol 2, No 1 pp7.
Tinsely, N. L . (2005). Guide to Opportunities to Improving Grand Accountability.
Vogelgesang, M. (2003). Microfinance in Times of Crisis: The Effect of Competition, Rising Indebtedness, and Economic Crisis on Repayment Behaviour World Development. Wo\.3\
Waterfield, C. & Ramsing, N. {]99S)._Handbook for Management Information Systems for Microfinance Institutions, CGAP Technical Tool. Series No. 1
V
Watkins, T., & Hicks K , (2009), Moving beyond Storytelling ,Emerging Research in Microfinance (Contemporary Studies in Economic and Financial Analysis) pg l45-m Volume 92
www.bis.org/publ/bcbscl25.pdf retrieved on 29th July 2013
www.ignite.gov/randp/grantRuide.pdf retrieved on 29th July 2013
Yehuala, S. (200S).Determinants of smallholder farmers' access to formal credit: The case of Metema Woreda, north Gondar, Ethiopia.
Yunus, M. (2003).Banker to the Poor: Micro-Lending and the Battle against World Poverty.New York, NY: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
51
APPENDICES
APPENDIX 1: L E T T E R OF INTRODUCTION
IRENE N G A L I M U K I T I
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY-AFRICA (USIU-A)
P.O. BOX 14634, 00800. — - - — - ^
NAIROBI
Dear Respondent,
R E : REQUEST TO PARTICIPATE IN T H E R E S E A R C H STUDY
I am a graduate student at United States International University, carrying out research on
CHALLENGES FACED B Y MICRO FINANCE INSTITUTIONS IN CREDIT
MANAGEMENT IN K E N Y A . This is in partial fulfilment of the requirement of the
Master of Business Administration degree program at the United States International
University-Africa.
The results of this study will contribute to the broad understanding of credit risk
management and mitigating factors. Your participation is very essential for the
accomplishment of this study and it will be highly appreciated. I guarantee that the
information that you wil l provide wil l be treated with the utmost confidentiality and will
be used only for academic purposes.
Thank you in advance.
Yours sincerely,
Irene Mukiti.
52
APPENDIX I I : QUESTIONNAIRE FOR MFI E M P L O Y E E S
SECTION ONE: G E N E R A L INFORMATION
Kindly answer the following questions by ticking in the boxes provided
1. Please indicate your position in the organization
Risk Manager [ ] Credit control Manager [ ] General Manager [ ]
4. How long has the MFI been in existence?
Less than 5 years [ ] 6 - 1 0 years [ ] 11-15 years [ ] above 15 years [ ]
5. Which services are offered by the MFI?
Savings [ ] Small loans [ ] Foreign exchange [ ] Interbank transactions [ ]
Foreign exchange transactions [ ] Equities and Bonds investment [ ] AH [ ]
6. What is the rate of credit default?
0-5% [ ] 6 - 1 0 % [ ] 11-15% [ ] 16-20% [ ] Above 20% [ ]
7. What types of loans are issued by the MFI?
Individual loans [ ] Group Loans [ ] Both [ ]
53
SECTION TWO: ESPOUSING FACTORS TO CREDIT RISK
How would you rank the risk level by the following factors in a scale of 1 to 10 where; 0
is neutral, 1 -3 represents Low risk, 4 -6 represents moderate risk while 7 -10 is High risk
High
(7-10)
Moderate
(4-6)
Low
(1-3)
Neutral (0)
a) Involvement of the organization in Foreign exchange transactions
b) Prevailing inflation rate conditions
c) Prevailing interest rates
d) Investment in bonds and equities
e) Operational risk
f) Loans to individual customers
g) Group loans issued
54
SECTION T H R E E : CREDIT MANAGEMENT POLICY AND CUSTOMER
RETENTION
To what extent do you agree with the following? Please indicate; 5=Strongly Agree,
4=Agree, 3=Disagree, 2= Strongly Disagree and 1 =Neutral
Statement
2 1 u ISJ
<
u Ml R .22 Q
•3D 2J
t .22 in
2
s u
a) Request for collateral security for customers each time
they get a loan reduces customer retention
b) Frequent training for customers on the different products
offered by the MFI enhances customer retention
c) Verification information provided by the loan applicant
each time can reduce customer loyalty
d)Managers establish long-term business relationship with
customers through continued communication
e)The interest rates are competitively set compared to other
MFIs
f) Issuance of credit time and duration on the loan type
discourages customers
3. Which methods would you recommend to MFIs which would help in the customer
retention?
i .
u
iii
55
SECTION FOUR: PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICES TO MANAGE CREDIT RISK
-ts) cj'hat extent do you agree the following? Please indicate; 5=Strongly Agree, 4=Agree,
3=Disagree, Strongly Disagree 1= Neutral
Statement "x^^
5 4»
? 1/3 <
u u
<
ii u 6£ C8
5
u bC u e bc o «
I.
"3 Z
a) The credit control policy implemented determines the risk exposure
b) Oversight of MFIs by active board and senior management would help reduce risk
c) The Management Information System adopted by an MFI helps in risk reduction
d)Maintaining an appropriate credit administration and monitoring of customers helps reduce on risk
e) Efficient intemal controls, supervision and audit are adequate to mitigate credit risk
4. Which methods would you recommend to MFIs which would help in risk
alleviation?
i
ii.
iii.
56