causes for variation in bromide concentration in groundwater of a granitic aquifer
TRANSCRIPT
Elango et al. Int. J. Res. Chem. Environ. Vol.3 Issue 2 April 2013(163-171)
163
International Journal of Research in Chemistry and Environment Vol. 3 Issue 2 April 2013(163-171)
ISSN 2248-9649
Research Paper
Causes for Variation in Bromide Concentration in Groundwater of a Granitic
aquifer
Brindha K. and *Elango L. Department of Geology, Anna University, Chennai - 600 025, Tamil Nadu, INDIA
Available online at: www.ijrce.org
(Received 12th
February 2013, Accepted 20th
March 2013)
Abstract: Groundwater quality is an important criterion to decide its use for domestic, agricultural and
industrial use. This study was carried out with an aim to understand the spatiotemporal variation and
sources of bromide in groundwater of a granitic formation in a part of Nalgonda district, Andhra
Pradesh, India. Groundwater samples were collected from 46 wells every two months from March 2008
to January 2010. The bromide concentration in groundwater varied from below detection limit to 5.48
mg/l with an average of 0.4 mg/l. Based on the acceptable daily intake of 6 mg/l of bromide by humans as
given by World Health Organisation, the groundwater is safe for consumption. But based on the toxicity
data from literature and the groundwater quality criterion of 1 mg/l, 8.27% of the groundwater samples
were above the limit. Average bromide concentration of 3.07 mg/kg was measured in the five fertiliser
samples collected from this area. The sources of bromide in this region vary from the granitic rocks to
fertilisers.
Keywords: Drinking water, agricultural area, fertiliser composition, acceptable daily intake, domestic use,
Nalgonda, India.
Introduction Several chemical ions are present in trace
quantities in groundwater naturally. The health
concerns due to high arsenic and fluoride are known
historically and there are many studies on groundwater
quality with special reference to arsenic and fluoride[1-
12]. But bromide is not given high importance and
studied worldwide. It is mainly present in seawater,
salt lakes, and underground brines associated with
oil[13]
. Seawater contains bromide ranging from 65
mg/l to above 80 mg/l[14]
. So the presence of bromide
in groundwater has been studied to understand
seawater intrusion and not much explored for other
causes. Bromide is a liquid at room temperature and it
also exists as bromide gas. Bromide reaches human
beings either through inhalation of bromine gas or as
bromide in food and water. It may be in drinking water
due to brominated disinfection by-products formed
during chlorination and ozonation. Bromide contents
in public drinking water supplies in Sicily, Italy was
reported to range from <0.025 to 4.76 mg/l[15]
with 3%
exceeding the groundwater quality criterion of 1
mg/l[16]
. Bromide in groundwater was studied in
Canterbury region, New Zealand[17]
, but could not
identify the source for bromide. Bromide values upto
11 mg/l was observed in groundwater in Rajasthan,
India[18]
. High bromine contents in vegetables in Japan
have also been reported[19]
.
However, there are no scientific studies on
occurrence of bromide in groundwater, especially on
its temporal and spatial variation in any region of the
world. This is evident by the absence of any scientific
publication on the natural bromide concentration in
groundwater. Though bromide has a low degree of
toxicity and hence it is not of toxicological concern[20]
,
it is important to monitor the groundwater quality
regularly with respect to bromide in areas where
groundwater is used for drinking and domestic
purposes without primary treatment. Considering this,
a study was carried out by the collection of
groundwater samples once every two months to
understand the bromide concentration in groundwater
and to identify its sources in a part of Nalgonda
district, Andhra Pradesh, India. The result of this study
for the period from March 2008 to January 2009 was
reported earlier[21]
. This study was continued by the
groundwater sampling and analysis once every two
Elango et al. Int. J. Res. Chem. Environ. Vol.3 Issue 2 April 2013(163-171)
164
months until January 2010. Thus the objective of this
paper is to understand the spatiotemporal variation in
bromide concentration in groundwater over two years
and to identify the causes for the presence of bromide
in groundwater.
Study area: The study area (724 sq km) is a part of
Nalgonda district, Andhra Pradesh, India, located
approximately 85 km ESE from Hyderabad, the capital
of Andhra Pradesh state, India (Figure 1). The northern
boundary is partly bounded by Gudipalli Vagu river
and the southern boundary is bounded by Pedda Vagu
river. The Nagarjuna Sagar reservoir is in the
southeastern boundary of the study area. The climate is
arid to semi-arid. In summer i.e. from April to June the
temperature ranges from 30oC
to 46.5
oC and in winter
i.e. from November to January, the temperature ranges
from 17oC to 38
oC. The average annual rainfall in this
area is about 600 mm which is mostly due to the
southwest monsoon occurring during June to
September. The ground surface slopes towards the
southeast direction. The rainfall, topography and
nature of formation have lead to dentritic to
subdentritic drainage pattern in this area. Numerous
tanks and few small reservoirs are present in the
depressed parts of the undulating topography of this
area. Few lined canal networks also cater for irrigation
activity. There are several small hillocks in this area
with height ranging from 250 m to 300 m.
This area lies in the northern part of the
Cuddapah basin. Geologically this region is largely
comprised of granitic rocks which belong to late
Archean (Figure 2). These rocks are generally medium
to coarse grained. They are traversed by numerous
dolerite dykes and quartz veins[22]
. Dolerite dykes
cutting across the granites are found practically all
over the area and are well exposed in most parts of the
area. The Srisailam formation which is the youngest
member of the Cuddapah supergroup, directly overlay
the basement granite with a distinct unconformity. The
quartzite of Srisailam formation is exposed in the
southeastern part of the study area. Hydrogeologically,
the study area consists of four distinct layers- the top
soil, highly weathered rocks, moderately weathered
rocks and massive rock. There are numerous wells in
this area which meet the domestic and agricultural
needs. Dug wells of this area have a depth ranging
from 1.45m to 20m and have diameters of 2m to 5 m.
Bore wells have depths greater than 10m and
diameters of 15 cm. Rainfall is the major source of
groundwater recharge, apart from irrigation returns.
The forest cover is thin to moderate. Most of the study
area comprises of agricultural land (Figure 3). Rice is
the principle crop grown in this area while other crops
include sweet lime, castor, cotton, grams and
groundnut. The cropping pattern is practised
depending on the climatic conditions and availability
of water sources.
Material and Methods Nearly 240 dug wells and bore wells were
investigated during an initial field survey and 42 dug
wells and 4 bore wells were chosen (Figure 4) for
regular monitoring of groundwater quality with respect
to bromide based on the electrical conductivity (EC).
A representative well in about every 15 km2 was
chosen. The groundwater samples were collected once
every two months from March 2008 to January 2010
leading to twelve sets of groundwater sampling and
analysis. The groundwater samples were collected
based on standard procedures in 500 ml capacity
bottles. Before using the sampling bottles, they were
soaked in 1:1 diluted nitric acid solution for 24 hours,
washed with distilled water and were washed again
prior to each sampling with the water to be sampled. In
the case of bore wells, the water samples were
collected after pumping the water for sufficient time so
as to collect the formation water. In case of dug wells
care was taken to collect the samples 30 cm below the
water table using a depth sampler. Groundwater level
was recorded during each groundwater sampling by
using a Solinst 101 water level indicator. Bromide
concentration in the groundwater samples were
analysed using an ion chromatograph (Metrohm 861)
along with appropriate standards after the samples
were filtered using 0.45µm Millipore filter paper. The
detection limit of the instrument is < 2ppb for anions.
Results and Discussion The minimum, maximum and median values
of bromide concentration in groundwater (mg/l) during
each sampling period is given in Figure 5. Overall, the
concentration of bromide in groundwater varied from
below detection limit (BDL) to 5.48 mg/l with an
average of 0.4 mg/l. The Indian standard specification
for drinking water[23]
does not specify any threshold
limit for bromide content in drinking water. From
previous studies[16]
, a groundwater quality criterion of
1 mg/l was established from literature which is used as
the maximum permissible limit. Based on this 41
groundwater samples of the total 496 had bromide
concentration above 1 mg/l. The percentage of
groundwater samples exceeding this limit had
increased from 5.51% (N=251) as reported in the
previous study[21]
to 8.27% (N=496).
Considering this and based on the monitoring
of bromide concentration in groundwater over a period
of two years of sampling, the areas having bromide
concentration below and above 1 mg/l is identified.
Overlay analysis was carried out using Arc GIS 9.3 by
assigning ranks and weightages using inverse distance
weighted method. Areas having groundwater with
bromide concentration below 1 mg/l was given a rank
of 1 and groundwater with bromide concentration
above 1 mg/l was given a rank of 2. A weightage of
0.083 was assigned to each month as groundwater has
to be within the limit of groundwater criterion during
Elango et al. Int. J. Res. Chem. Environ. Vol.3 Issue 2 April 2013(163-171)
165
the entire study period. The composite suitability index
(CSI) was calculated by multiplying the ranks and
weightages for each month and then by summing them
for twelve months. A CSI of 1 is considered suitable
and above 1 is considered unsuitable based on the
bromide concentration in groundwater. The
groundwater quality map for this area based on the
toxicity data and criterion[16]
is given in Figure 6.
Though the groundwater quality criterion for
bromide is 1 mg/l, it is essential to estimate the intake
by humans through the drinking water pathway. The
acceptable daily intake (ADI) of bromide through
drinking water by humans considering a relative
source contribution of 50%, 60 kg of adult weight and
2 l of water consumed per day was 6 mg/l[20]
. Based on
this, none of the groundwater samples were above the
ADI of 6 mg/l.
The spatial variation in bromide concentration
in groundwater during July 2008 and 2009 is shown in
Figure 7 which does not show any similarity. Bromide
is often used as a tracer in groundwater studies as its
background concentration is very low. The bromine
concentration in granite rocks was reported to be 0.3
mg/kg[24]
. As the granitic rocks are present in most part
of the study area (Figure 2), the rock water interaction
can be a source for bromide concentration in
groundwater. The average concentration of bromide in
seawater is 65 mg/l to above 80 mg/l[14]
. So presence
of bromide in marine environment is a common
phenomenon. The Cuddapah basin present in the
southeastern part of this area has sediments that were
deposited in a shallow marine shelf and beach
environment[25]
. So this could be a reason for the
bromide content in groundwater of this area.
Apart from the natural source, fertilisers
applied to agricultural fields can also contribute to
bromide. For this, five fertilisers commonly used in
this area were collected and analysed for their bromide
content. The concentration of bromide in these
fertilisers varied from 1.48 mg/kg to 7.55 mg/kg with
an average of 3.07 mg/kg (Table 1). Hence the source
for the presence of varying concentration of bromide
in groundwater in this area is also due to the
application of fertilisers. The variation in the bromide
concentration in agricultural and domestic wells is
shown in Figure 8. More wells in the agricultural areas
have bromide above 1 mg/l. However a systematic
variation in bromide concentration in groundwater was
not observed spatially which may be due to varying
sources such as local contamination as well as
groundwater flow.
Conclusion The quality of groundwater based on bromide
was studied in a part of Nalgonda district, Andhra
Pradesh, India from March 2008 to January 2010 by
bi-monthly sampling and analysis. The concentration
of bromide varied from BDL to 5.48 mg/l. Spatial
variation in bromide concentration did not show any
systematic variation which may be due to varied
sources and local contamination. Of the 496
groundwater samples analysed, all were below the
ADI of 6 mg/l as proposed by WHO. The sources of
bromide in groundwater varied from natural to
anthropogenic sources. The granitic rocks present in
this area contain bromide which could have
contributed to bromide in groundwater. The bromide
content in fertilisers collected and analysed from this
area ranged between 1.48 mg/kg and 7.55 mg/kg.
Hence, application of fertilisers can also result in high
bromide in groundwater. This study helped to identify
the various sources for bromide in groundwater in this
area. Also this study will serve as a baseline data on
bromide concentration in groundwater for this area and
has highlighted the contribution of bromide from
fertilisers.
Acknowledgement The authors would like to acknowledge the
Board of Research in Nuclear Sciences, Department of
Atomic Energy, Government of India for funding this
work (Grant no. 2007/36/35). Authors also like to
thank the Department of Science and Technology’s
Funds for Improvement in Science and Technology
scheme (Grant No. SR/FST/ESI-106/2010) and
University Grants Commission’s Special Assistance
Programme (Grant No. UGC DRS II
F.550/10/DRS/2007 (SAP-1)) for their support in
creating laboratory facilities, which helped in carrying
out part of this work.
References 1. Saini, P., Khan, S., Baunthiyal, M. and Sharma, V.,
Mapping of fluoride endemic area and assessment of F
−1 accumulation in soil and vegetation. Environmental
Monitoring and Assessment, 185(2), 2001-2008 (2013)
2. Srikanth R., Gautam A., Jaiswal S. C. and Singh P., Urinary fluoride as a monitoring tool for assessing
successful intervention in the provision of safe drinking water supply in five fluoride-affected villages in Dhar
district, Madhya Pradesh, India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 185(3), 2343-2350 (2013)
3. Rahaman S., Sinha A. C., Pati R. and Mukhopadhyay D.,
Arsenic contamination: a potential hazard to the affected areas of West Bengal, India. Environmental Geochemistry
and Health, 35(1), 119-132 (2013)
4. Simsek C., Assessment of naturally occurring arsenic contamination in the groundwater of Sarkisla Plain
(Sivas/Turkey). Environmental Earth Sciences, 68(3), 691-702 (2013)
5. Brindha K., Rajesh R., Murugan R. and Elango L.,
Fluoride contamination in groundwater in parts of Nalgonda district, Andhra Pradesh, India. Environmental Monitoring
and Assessment, 172, 481- 492 (2011)
Elango et al. Int. J. Res. Chem. Environ. Vol.3 Issue 2 April 2013(163-171)
166
6. Kim Y., Kim J. Y. and Kim K., Geochemical
characteristics of fluoride in groundwater of Gimcheon, Korea: Lithogenic and agricultural origins. Environmental
Earth Sciences, 63(5), 1139-1148 (2011)
7. Young S. M., Pitawala A. and Ishiga H., Factors controlling fluoride contents of groundwater in north-central
and northwestern Sri Lanka. Environmental Earth Sciences, 63(6), 1333-1342 (2011)
8. Brindha K., Rajesh R., Murugan R. and Elango L.,
Natural and anthropogenic influence on the fluoride and nitrate concentration of groundwater in parts of Nalgonda
district, Andhra Pradesh, India. Journal of Applied Geochemistry, 12(2), 231-241 (2010)
9. Reddy D. V., Nagabhushanam P., Sukhija B. S., Reddy A.
G. S. and Smedley P. L., Fluoride dynamics in the granitic aquifer of the Wailapally watershed, Nalgonda District,
India. Chemical Geology, 269(3-4), 278-289 (2010)
10. Shukla D. P., Dubey C. S., Singh N. P., Tajbakhsh M. and Chaudhry M., Sources and controls of Arsenic
contamination in groundwater of Rajnandgaon and Kanker District, Chattisgarh Central India. Journal of Hydrology,
395(1-2), 49-66 (2010)
11. Yidana S. M., Yakubo B. B. and Akabzaa T. M., Analysis of groundwater quality using multivariate and
spatial analyses in the Keta basin, Ghana. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 58, 220–234 (2010)
12. Francisca F. M. and Perez M. E. C., Assessment of natural arsenic in groundwater in Cordoba Province,
Argentina. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 31(6), 673-682 (2009)
13. Lyday P. A., Bromine. U.S. Geological Survey Minerals
Yearbook-2003, 14, 1-14.10 (2003)
14. Al-Mutaz I. S., Water desalination in the Arabian Gulf region. (In M. F. A. Goosen and W. H. Shayya (Eds.), Water
management, purification and conservation in arid climates. Vol. 2. Water purification, Basel: Technomic Publishing,
245–265 (2000)
15. D’Alessandro W., Bellomo S., Parello F., Brusca L. and
Longo M., Survey on fluoride, bromide and chloride contents in public drinking water supplies in Sicily (Italy).
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 145, 303-313
(2008) 16. Flury M. and Papritz A., Bromide in the natural
environment: Occurrence and toxicity. Journal of Environmental Quality, 22(4), 747–758 (1993)
17. Bathurst E. T. J., Thomson L. J. and Wilkinson L. F.,
Bromide in Canterbury ground water. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 14(4), 409-411 (1980)
18. Singh R. V., Kumar V., Meenakshi and Gopal R.,
Studies on occurrence of bromide in ground water of Churu district in Rajasthan. Indian Journal of Environmental
Health, 37(3), 149-153 (1995)
19. Mino Y. and Yukita M., Detection of high levels of bromide in vegetables using X-ray fluorescence
spectrometry. Journal of Health Science, 51(3), 365-368 (2005)
20. WHO, Bromide in Drinking-water. Background
document for development of WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality, WHO/HSE/WSH/09.01/6, (2009)
21. Brindha K. and Elango L., Study on bromide in
groundwater in parts of Nalgonda district, Andhra Pradesh. Earth Science India, 3(1), 73-80 (2010)
22. GSI, Geological Survey of India’s Geology and minerals map of Nalgonda district, Andhra Pradesh, India, (1995)
23. BIS, Bureau of Indian Standards specification for
drinking water [B], IS:10500:91. Revised 2003, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India, (2003)
24. Bowen H. J. M., Environmental chemistry of the
elements. London: Academic Press, 333 (1979)
Rasheed M. A., Prasanna M. V., Kumar T. S., Patil D. J. and Dayal A. M., Geo-microbial prospecting method for
hydrocarbon exploration in Vengannapalli Village, Cuddapah Basin, India. Current Science, 95(3), 361-366
(2008)
Table 1
Concentration of bromide in fertilisers used in the study area
Fertiliser Bromide (mg/kg)
Zinc sulphate 7.55
Potash 2.66
Ammonium sulphate 1.68
Urea 1.98
NPK complex 1.48
Elango et al. Int. J. Res. Chem. Environ. Vol.3 Issue 2 April 2013(163-171)
167
Figure 1: Location of the study area
Figure 2: Geology of the study area
Elango et al. Int. J. Res. Chem. Environ. Vol.3 Issue 2 April 2013(163-171)
168
Figure 3: Landuse/ land cover in the study area
Figure 4: Location of the sampling wells in the study area
Elango et al. Int. J. Res. Chem. Environ. Vol.3 Issue 2 April 2013(163-171)
169
Figure 5: Minimum, maximum and median levels of bromide concentration in groundwater (mg/l)
Figure 6 Groundwater quality map based on bromide
Elango et al. Int. J. Res. Chem. Environ. Vol.3 Issue 2 April 2013(163-171)
170
Figure 7: Spatial variation in bromide concentration in groundwater (mg/l) during July 2008 and 2009