document resume he 003 298 author spickelmier, don o ... · *public colleges and universities 2 10...
TRANSCRIPT
DOCUMENT RESUME
ED 066 131 HE 003 298
AUTHOR Spickelmier, Don O.; Freeman, Kenneth H.TITLE A Survey of Policies and Practices Relating to
Non-Traditional Educational Experiences.INSTITUTION Texas Technological Coll., Lubbock. School of
Education.PUB DATE Jul 72NOTE 41p.
EDRS PRICE MF-$0.65 HC-$3.29DESCRIPTORS Adult Education; *Bachelors Degrees; *Degree
Requirements; *Equivalency Tests; *Higher Education;Independent Study; *Special Degree Programs
ABSTRACTThis document presents the results of a study
designed to: (1) obtain information that will be useful to collegesand universities as they develop new policies and implement practicesin the area of Non-Traditional Educational Experiences (N-TEE); and(2) define current policy and practice and to obtain a sense ofdirection for additional activities regarding N-TEE that will beuseful. In order to obtain such inforuation, the institutions withinthe Texas College and University System were studied. The types ofnontraditional studies programs found in operation were college anduniversity correspondence, military correspondence, independentstudy, military--formal residence courses, and closed circuittelevision instruction on campus. The methods of evaluation mostoften used in the institutions are equivalency examinations developedby the institution, and the general and srbject area examinations ofCLEP, USAFI, and GED. (HS)
FILMED FROM BEST AVAIIABLE COPY
A SURVEY OF POLICIES AND PRACTICES RELATiNG TONON-TRADITIONAL EDUCATIONAL EXPERIENCES
by
DON 0. SPICKELNIER,ReavotA Assissany
KENNETH H. FREENANIfiqm.ipaI Invest VD'
U.S. DEPARTMENTOF HEALTH.
EDUCATION & WELFAREOFFICE OF EDUCATION
THIS DOCUMENTHAS BEEN REPRO-
DUCED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FROM
THE PERSON ORORGANIZATION ORIG-
INATING IT. POINTS OF VIEW OR OPIN-
IONS STATED DO NOT NECESSARILY
REPRESENT OFFICIALOFFICE OF EDU-
CATION POSITION OR POLICY.
College of EducaticeTexas Tech University
Lubbock, Texas
July, 1972
A SURVEY OF POLICIES AND PRACTICES RELATING TO
NON-TRADITIONAL EDUCATIONAL EXPERIENCES
Purpose of the Study:
The purpose of this study is to obtain information that will be use-
ful to colleges and universities as they develop new policies and implement
practices in the area of Non-Traditional Educational Experiences. Further,
it is the purpose of this study to define current policy and practice in
an elementary way and to obtain a sense of direction for additional activit-
ies regarding N-TEE that will be useful.
Procedures:
The basic approach to this research has been an attempt to answer the
following question: What are the policies and practices, current and
planned, of Texas colleges and universities for the use of Non-Traditional
Educational Experiences? Texas Colleges and Universities as used herein
refers to the institutions listed by category in the Annual Report of
the Coordinatin Board Teias Colle e and Universit S stem 1970. (See
APPENDIX B for complete list.)
Early in this study, other pertinent research on non-traditional
learning, either completed or in-progress, was consulted including the
following:
1. Bates, Lee J. "An Inventory of Non-Traditional LearningExperiences at Comunity Colleges Near Military Bases."
Washington, D.C.: American Association of Community-Junior Colleges, 1971.
2. Commission on Non-Traditional Study. New Dimensions forthe Learner.
new yorE: The Commission, Septenter, 1971.
of>
3. Sharon, Amiel T. "College Credit for Off-Campus Study."Washington, D.C.: ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education,Report Bo March, 1971.
The researcher constructed an inventory instrument (N-TEE Inventory)
designed to collect data which would reveal accurately how colleges and
universities are currently using N-TEE on these campuses (See APPENDIX A).
On June 26, 1972, the N-TEE Inventory was mailed to 121 Texas institutions
including junior colleges, senior colleges, and universities both public
and private. Representatives of 81 colleges and universities (67 percent)
responded by completing the inventory (See APPENDIX B).
The data regarding N-TEE categories were collated and recorded by
number and percentage in TABLE I, pages 4-13,wbich reveals the current
and planned use of N-TEE by colleges and universities in Texas. The data
regarding the methods by which colleges and universities evaluate or plan
to evaluate non-traditional educational experiences for credit and advanced
standing were collated and recorded in TABLE II, pages 14-24.;
Included in the inventory were a few questions not dealing directly
with, but closely related to N-TEE. Responses to these questions are
revealed in TABLE III, page 25..
Limitations of the Study:
One limitation of the study is the difficulty in designing and con-
structing an instrument which will reflect adequately the categories of
N-TEE. To some colleges a particular educational experience may be con-
sidered traditional, while to other colleges those same experiences may
be viewed as non-traditional.
The range and type of institutions surveyed in this study precluded
the development of one instrument which would have equal relevance to
all institutions. Some senior colleges and universities concerned pri-
imarily with upper-le,,e1 and graduate study found that the N-TEE Inventory
instrument was inadequate in reflecting their policies and practices.
The qualifications, limitations, and specific conditions under which
some colleges allow students to establish credit or advanced standing for
N-TEE defies the possibility of a complete response on an inventory. An
instrument that provided for the opportunity to record these ramifications
becomes impractical in length and unmanageable for interpretation.
Findings:
The findings discussed in what follows are contained in more detail
in TABLES I, II, III, and APPENDIX A. Each of the categories listed in
the N-TEE Inventory is used by some colleges in the educational programs
of their students.
In relation to the N-TEE categories, as one might suspect,the ones
most often used by colleges and universities in the educational programs
of their students 3re College and University Correspondence, Military
Correspondence, Independent Study (under competent supervision), Military
Forman Residence Courses, and Closed Circuit Television Instruction on
campus.
In relation to the methods by which colleges and universities evaluate
N-TEE for credit or advanced standing, the methods most often used are
equivalency exams developed by the institution, the general and subject
area examinations of CLEP, USAFI (CASE Norms), and GED.
There seems to be fairly strong sentiment against a National Agency
to examine and validate N-TEE experiences. A itate-Wide donference of
academic officers on N-TEE policies and practices was favored by a majority
(69%) of all colleges responding (see TABLE III-page 25).
4
TABLE I
N-TEE CATEGORIES
- TABLE I
tannnt Nn 1 - Afl N_.7 ..7 r
Nn Jecponse YFS
No ___%______Na.__INo_______%_____,NO
18 90
Pl AN TO 4
No I10Public Colleges and Universities 2
Public Junior Colleges 1 3 32 94 1 3
Private Colleges and Universities 20 91 2 9
Private Junior Colleges 5 100
TOTALS (Sample-81) 3 4 75 93 3 4
W.jairgunry ila, z - 171 vaie Lorresiunaence cnoci
No RPsponseNo.
2
%
10
No,
1
la_%
5
ttONo.
16
d% _ft.
80
PLAN
1
TO
%
5*Public Colleges and Universities
Public Junior Colleges 7 21 4 12 22 65 1
_.
3
Pri vate Col 1 eges and Universi ties 8 36 3 14 11 50
Private Juni-or-Colleges 2- 40 3 60
TOTALS (Sample-81) 17 21 10 12 52 64 2 3
aorv No- 3No Res prince YES ti) PlAN TO
1 I I
Public Colleges and Universities 2 10 10 50 6 30 2 10
Public Junior Colleges 7 21 8 24 16 47 3 9
Private Colleges and Universities 9 41 6 27 6 27 1 5
Private Junior Colleges 1 20 4 80
TOTALS (Sample-81) 18 22 25 31 32 40 6 7
Table I - cont.
4,4,40.1404.4.mid---.=k4.14-Ir.-94-4-vraz4-4-1.31-1..ur-puricielicei. :
No..
%
5
No
17 85
NO PLAN TONn_
1
%
5
ko
1
% 4
5Public Colleges and Universities 1
,
Public. Juni or Col 1 eges1 3 27 79 4 12 2 6
Private Colleges and Universities 29 18 82
,2
Private Junior Colleges5 100
_
TOTALS (Sample-81) 4 5 67 83 7 9 3 4
.. .
No Response INCNO. %
unNo. %
PI AN InNn %No. %
*Public Colleges and Universities 2 10 5 25 12 60 1 5
Public Junior Colleges 7 20 26 76
Private Colleges and Universities 2 5 23 13 59
Pri vate'l Utif or Col le-gts -- 5 100
TOTALS (Sample-81) 4 5 17 21 56 69
.vlik_RewnseNO.
2
%
10
VFS
No.
4
%,
20
No
13
&
65
21.10LICI__No
1 5Public Colleges and Universities
Public Junior Colleges 3 9 29 1 85 2 6
Private Colleges and Universities 1 4 2 19 86
Private Junior Colleges 5 100
TOTALS (Sample-81) , 4 9 11 66 81 3 4
TABLE I - cont.1ate3nnry Nn 7 --
ND ReSpDIISD______YES%
15
N9_
4
t20
NOAn_
12
I60
--P-LAN-14-Nn
1 5
No
3Public Colleges and Universities
Public Junior Colleges 1 3 5 15 27 79 1
Private Colleges and Universities 1 5 10 45 10 45 1
Private Junior Colleges 1 20 4 80
TOTALS (Sample-81)5 6 20 25 53 65 3
........ ,N.V , ,..,.. - 7,,,No RPsponse YES
No. %
NO
..1o. %
PLAN TQNo_ _ I,No. %
Public Colleges and Universities 4 20 3 15 12 60 1 5
Public Junior Colleges 3 9 29 85 2 6
Private Colleges and Universities 1 4 4 18 16 73 1 4
Private JUni or Colleges 5 100
IOTALS (Sample-81) 5 6 10 12 62 77 4 5
.....--......--,
No. .
4
1
%
20
No.
1
t5
tin-
14
1___ELAN
&
70
No -
1
TO
%
5Public Colleges and Universities
Public Junior Colleges 1 3 2 6 30 88 1. 3
Private Colleges and Universities 1 4 21 96
..
Private Junior Colleges 5 100
_
TOTALS (Sample-81) 5 6 4 5 70 1 86 2 3:1
TAdLE I - cod. 7
.
RD RecponsPNg_ _,...4Ita_i__IiDraaa.---:Z,---,
3 15
Vs
1 5
No
14 70
11 AN
2
JO
10Public Colleges and Universities
Public Junior Colleges 1 3 2 6 27 79 4 12
Private Colleges and Universities 2 9 2 9 14 64 4 18
Private Junior Colleges 5 .10
TOTALS (Sample-81) 6 7 5 6 60 74 10 12
wo m-tiv. i y qv 1" " rAn...- I u" luluji.V.tjNn RecpnnspNo.
3
%
15
YESNo.,
7
%
35
NO
llo.
9 45
_PLAN
1
TO
5Public Colleges and Uni-versitieF
Public Junior Colleges 6 18 27 79 1 3
Private Colleges and Universities 1 4 11 50 9 41 1 4
.Private %Mort Colle-ges 3 60 2 40
TOTALS (Sampl e-81) 4 5 27 33 47 58 3 4
Responce.. YE$ ELI PLAN TOINoNo.
3
%
15
ji .
4
1
20
N _
13 65
No 9:---tPublic Colleges and Universities
Public Junior Colleges 1 3 4 12 29 85
Private Colleges and Universities 6 27 5 23 11 50
Private Junior Colleges 1 20 4 80
...
TOTALS (Sample-81) 10 12 14 17 57 70
a .,ImiLL I - Lora.
ratannrw NA 111
8
ICrPTITli -lir- 1r v.., 1.7 gr_Na_Response
3
%
15
la-jia.______Llia_a______No____%
1 5
NO
15 75
PLAN
1
TO
5Public Colleges and Universities
Public Junior Colleges 1 3 32 94 1 3
Private Colleges and Universities 1 4 2 9 17 77 2 9
Private Junior Colleges 5 100
TOTALS (Sample-81) 4 5 4
,
5 69 85 4 5
Ca - Health FieldsNe Recponse YES NO PLAN TO
Ro. % No. . % No_ . % Nn. %
Public Colleges and Universities 2 10 2 10 13 65 3 15
Public Junior Colleges 7 20 22 65 5 15
Private Colleges and Universities 2 9 5 23 14 64 1 4
Private JuntorGolleges 5 100
..
TOTALS (Sample-81) 4 5 14 17 54 67 9 11
Category No 2 - Government and Pol i ticsNo Response YES NO PLM TONo. % Z Nn. k no % 0
10Public Colleges and Universities 3 15
_No.
1 5 14 70 2
Public Junior Colleges 1 3 1 3 32 94
Private Colleges and Universities 2 9 1 4 16 73 3 14
Private Junior Colleges 5 100
TOTALS (Sample-82) 6 7 3 4 67 83 5 6
_
:10
lABLE I - cont.r2panciwn, Nn 16 Ilrama
9
No Peq nfle ITc No PI AN
NoTo%tin %
15
10
2
%
10
Nn
15
"
75Public Colleges and Universities
3
Public Junior Col leges2 6 30 88 2 6
Private Colleges and Universities3 14 1 4 14 64 4 18
Private Junior Colleges5 100
TOTALS (Sample-81) 6 7 5 6 64 79 6
. ......
No Iles onse YES Nn..
P1 AN TOv. No. % No. %
10
No ,
.13
%
65
Nn
2
%
10Public Colleges and Universities 3 15 2
Public Junior Colleges 1 3 1 3 30 88 2 6
Private Colleges and Universities 3 14 2 15 2 9
Private Junior Colleges- 5
_68
100
TOTALS (Sample-81) 7 9 5 6 63 78 6 7
No 1 e 1 . ! s
No. _No- Nn _ 4No % .
Public Colleges and Universities 3 15 1 5 14 70 2 10
Public Junior Colleges1 3 30 88
Private Colleges and Universities 3 14 1 4 17 77
Private Junior Colleges1 20 4 80
TOTALS (Sample-81) 6 65 80
TABLE I - cont. 10
;alder L.omp tent bupey' islf03--
20
No RpcponseSO.
2
'I
10
I YES
t1p
13 65
NO
4
Pi AN
tin--.-1----,
1
Ta
5Public Colleges and Universities
Public Junior Colleges 13 38 18 53 3 9
Private Colleges and Universities 1 4 16 73 3 14 2 9
Private Junior Colleges1 2 40 3 60
TOTALS (Sample-81) 3 4 1 44 54 28 35 7
Category No. 20 - Individual Stud -,Nn Rcssporlse YES NO PLAN TONo. % No. % No. _ An_ I;
Public Colleges and Universities g 45 1 5 9 45 1 5
Public Junior Colleges 3 9 1 3 30 88
Private Colleges and Universities 3 14 19 86
,
Private Juni-or-Colleges 1 20 4 80
TOTALS (Sample-81) 16 20 2 2 62 77 1 1
Category No. 2 1 - Militar -Formal Residence CoursesNo Response YES I NO PLAN_ TONo. % No.. % 1 Nn. 14 110 _ %
Public Colleges and Universities 3 15 10 50 5 25 2 10
Public Junior Colleges 1 3 20 59 10 29 3 9
Private Colleges and Universities 4 18 14 64 3 14 1 4
Private Junior Colleges 3 60 2 40
TOTALS (Sample-81) 8 10 47 58 20 25 6 7
TABLE I - cont. 11
CategoriNo. zz - TV (on cavusl losedallesponsp
No
1
Circuit
%
5
InstructionYES NO PLAN TO
No_
9
%
45
_tin..
7
,Nn.
35 3
%
15Publi c Colleges and Uni versi ties
Publi c Junior Colleges 1 3 8 24 22 65 3 9
Private Colleges and Universities 2 9 10 45 9 41 1 4
Private Junior Colleges 1 20 3 60 1 20
TOTALS (Sample-81) 5 6 27 33 41 51 8 10
tiD RP onsP YES NO PLAN TO
.No % No.. % No Z _Nn. 1.
Public Colleges and Universities 2 10 17 85 1 5
Public Junior Colleges 2 6 30 88 2 6
Private Colleges and Uni versities 3 14 19 86
Privatequmorcolle-g-es -- 1 20 4 80
TOTALS (Sampl e-81) 6 7 2 2 70 86 3 4
category No. z4 - Tv (commerclai ) uenerai ana cuiturai taucarion. .. , . YES NO PLAN TO
Ne. %
10
No. _ % Nn
1 7
R
85
No
1 5Public Colleges and Universities 2
Public Junior Colleges 1 3 2 6 31 91
Private Colleges and Universities 3 14 19 86
,
Private Junior Colleges 1 20 4 80
TOTALS (Sample-81) 7 9 2 2
I
71 88 1 1
13
1ABLE 1 - cont.ratannorti Lin
12
4 _
i_Nn Responce
5
YFS
1 5
NO
15 75
PLAN
No
3
To'X
15Public Colleges and Universities
Public Jun 11r Colleges 1 3 6 18 25 73 2 6
Private Colleges and Universities ,, 14 1 4 18 82
Private Junior Colleges 2 40 3 60
TOTALS (Sample-81) 5 6 10 12 61 75
t o ! ass - 11 ' II INo, %
10
Ng.
1 5
N .
15
%
75
Nn.
2
%
10Public Colleges and Universities 2
Public Junior Colleges 1 3 2 6 28 3 9
Private Colleges and Universities 3 14 1 4 18 82
Private- Jonior Colleges 1 20 1 20 3 60
,
TOTALS (Sample-81) 7 9 5 6 64 79 5 6
category Pin. li - N-Itt use In Pr.grams or bupenor..,
JTuaggis .
Public Colleges and Universities 1 5 9 45 8 40 2 10
Public Junior Colleges 1 3 12 35 17 50 4 12
Private Colleges and Universities 15 68 6 27 1 5
Private Junior Colleges
-
.2 40 2 40 1 20
...
TOTALS (Sample-81) 2 2 38 47 33 41 8 10
14
TABLE I - cont...rre ii
its
usx.i.r...guLjuwLIL-T-11--ILL-115e. JIL rra rdals 01 killPra P `.114(111/1 C.
No Recoonse VS PLANNo
3
TO
%
15
No
1
%
5
.No
9
%
45
_NO
Nn
7
I35Public Colleges and Universities
Public Junior Colleges 1 3 10 29 20 59 3 9
Private Colleges and Universities 1 4 14 64 6 27 1 4
Private Junior Colleges 2 40 3 60
TOTALS (Sample-81) 3 4 35 43 36 44 7 9
&ILategory no_ cv - N-Itt use in Frnrams or mar htuapnrcNn Bespoose YES NO
,pl AN TQ
No. % No. % No. % Nn %
Public Colleges and Universities 1 5 7 35 10 50 2 10
Public Junior Colleges 1 3 10 29 20 59 3 9
Private Colleges and Universities 9 41 12 55_ 1 4
Private Juni-or-Gol-leges 1- 20 4 80
TOTALS (Sample-81) 2 2 27 33 46 57 6 7
- lilt IU lii unit, I illS flit, IV -
NO Responu YES I NO PLAN Ttl 1
No. % No. ._.% 1 Nn _
Public Colleges and Universities 2 10 5 25 12 60 1 5
Public Junior Colleges 1 3 10 29 21 62 2 6
Private Colleges and Universities 4 18 27 11 50 1 5
,
Private Junior Colleges 1 20 3 60 1 20
TOTALS (Sample-81) 7 9 22 27 47 58 5 6
A
TABLE I I
METHODS FOR EVALUATION OF N -TEE
TABLE II 14isjoialLuuz,_.A_L-Li4u1vallancy moms y Tour LO11139P
NO RPsponse ( YES NO
No_PLAN._ TO
Public Colleges and Universities 1
___1,_
5 14 70 2 10 3 15
Public Junior Colleges 2 6 21 62 8 24 3 9
Private Colleges and Universities 2 9 15 68 4 18 1 3
Private Junior Colleges 2 40 3 60
TOTALS (Sample-81) 5 6 52 64 17 21 7 9
Method No. 2 - Certification of Ability by Non-Educational Organizatiqnh !- ... - YES _lig
No_ .
ELM TONn_ %No. . % No. . %
Public Colleges and Universities 1 5 18 90 1 5
Public Junior Colleges 5 15 1 3 27 79 1 3
Private Colleges and Universities 14 3 14 16 73
PrivateOtdiorCo1l6ges = 1 20 1 20 8 60
TOTALS (Sample-81) 10 12 5 6 64 79
_
2 2
Method No. 3 - TransferNo Response YES NO PLAN TO
-NoNo. % No_ %
60
Nn_
3
&
15
-
1
%
5Public Colleges and Uni versi ties 4 20 12
Public Junior Colleges 5 15 26 76 2 6 1 3
Private Colleges and Universities 6 27 12 54 4 18
Private Junior Colleges 1 20 4 so
TOTALS (Sample-81) 16 20 54 67 9 11 2 2
TABLE II - cont.Mtthod No. 4 - ACT
15
I :-N
...%
10
NA_
4 20
LI
Nn
13
%
65
' !No
1
It5Public Colleges and Universities 2
Public Junior Colleges 7 21 12 35 14 41 1 3
Private Colleges and Universities 6 27 4 18 10 45 2 9
Private unior Colleges 3 60 2 40
TOTALS (Sample-81) 15 19 23 28 39 48 4 5
...--......Nn Response YES NO PLAN TONo . 1 No. . % No
1
%
5
Nn..
4
°Z
i
20Public Colleges and Universities 3 15 12 60
Public Juoior Colleges 6 18 17 50 10 29 1 3:
Private Colleges and Universities 4 18 13 59 3 14 .2 9
Private' Jimior Colleges- 1 20 2 40 2 40
TOTALS (Sample-81) 13 16 43 53 16 20 9 11..
,No Response YES NO PLAN TONo. °
,
Public Colleges and Universities 9 45 8 40 2 10 1 5
Public Junior Colleges 17 50 7 21 8 23 2 6
Private Colleges and Universities 7 32 12 55 2 9 1 4
Private Junior Colleges 4 80 1 20
TOTALS (Sample-81) 37 46 27 33 12 15 5 6
18
TABLE II - cont.No. 5b - CLEP - Subiect
16
rlIFIIWPIIIPIT--
No 2pqponseALL
8 40
YES
8 40
NO
Nn-
1
%
5
PLANIlia1_3
TO
15Public Colleges and Universities
Public Junior Colleges 16 47 9 26 6 18 3
Private Colleges and Universities 7 32 12 55
Private Junior Colleges 4 80 1 20
TOTALS (Sample-81) 35 43 29 36 8 10 9 11
Method No. 5c - CLEP - Case NormsNo Res nnspNo. %
YES
No. %
NO
No. _ %
PLAN
Na.TO
%
-Public Colleges and Universities 14 70 1 5 5 25
Public Junior Colleges 20 59 4 12 7 21 3 8
Private Colleges and Universities 12 55 3 14 6 27 1 4
Private Junforiol-leges 4 80 1 20
TOTALS (Sample-81) 50 62 8 10 19 23 4 5
Method No. 5d - CLEF - Norms developea oy your institutionNo Response YES NO PLAN TO
No. % No. . % Nn_ . A No % ,
Public Colleges and Universities 11 55 7 35 2 10
Public Junior Colleges 24 71 6 18 2 6 2 6
Private Colleges and Universities 11 50 7 32 3 14 1 4
Private Junior Colleges 4 80 1 20
TOTALS (Sample-81) 50 62 20 25 8 10 3 14
TABLE I I - cont . 17
No Respnnsi, ESNo _
.16 80
Nn
2
PLANNo
1
TO%
5
_No.1 1
%
10Public Colleges and Universities
Public Junior Colleges 5 15 9 26 17 50
Private Colleges and Universities 3 14 12 55 7 32
Private Junior Colleges1 20 3 60 1 20
TOTALS (Sample-81) 10 12 40 49 26 32 5 6
Nn Rpsponsp YES NO PLAN TONo.
151
%
75
No.
3
%
15
I No.
2
%
10
No_
Public Colleges and Universities
Public Junior Colleges 23 68 6 18 4 12 1 3
Private Colleges and Universities 14 64 5 23 3 14
Pri vaterttifilor Collegos -- 3 60 1 20 1 20
TOTALS (Sample-81) 55 68 15 19 10 12 1 1
ILmeow No. on - UbiAt'l Norms aevelopea oy your instituuonNo jlespowNo. %
YES
An-- t 4
NO
Nn- &
PLAN
No
TO
Public Colleges and Universities 17 85 1 5 2 10
Public Junior Colleges 23 82 2 6 3 9 1 3
Private Colleges and Universities 15 -68 1 4 6 27...
Private Junior Colleges 5 100
.
_
TOTALS (Sample-81) 65 80 4 5 11 14 1 1
20
1
TABLE II - cont. 18
No Response YES NO
No_
12
/60
PLANNo
1
TO
%
5
No no_ %
Public Collers and Universities 5
_I_25
,
2 10
Public Junior Colleges 10 29 2 6 21 64
Private Colleges and Universities 6 27 1 4 13 59 2 9
Privath Junior Colleges 2 40 3 60
TOTALS (Sample-81) 23 28 5 6 50 62 3 4
YES NO PLAN TO
_AD.
60
% jin....
1
1
Public Colleges and Universities 2 10 12 5 25
Public Junior Colleges 4 12 28 82 2 6
Private Colleges and Universities 3 14 13 59 5 23 1
PrivateltAior Col le-gts-- 5 100
TOTALS (Sample-81) 9 11 58 72 12 15 2
p_ Response_
1 Nn-
- .
Public Colleges and Universities
Public Junior Colleges
, I
i
Private Colleges and Universities
Private Junior Colleges
TOTALS (Sample-81)
21
ITABLE II - cont.
Credit bi Iletftod No. 1 - Equivalency Exams By Your Colle e
19
14 RPSP-One----44---%
(1)_____ Credi
3
trAliq
15
. I
NL29-NL
-a
7
____.:L___No..
35
Nn-_act_Publ i c Colleges and Uni versi ti es 10 50
Publi c Junior Colleges 15 44 6 18 2 6 11 32 156-NL
NLPrivate Colleges and Universities 8 36 3 14 9 41 2 9
Private Junior Colleges 3 60 1 20 1 20 -3-NI
TOTALS (Sample-81) 33 4 9 11 22 27 17 21
10.
16
%
80
(A)No-
3
1 .i4n..
15
(a_%
re-di A_.1La..Re.s.pznsP
to.
1
if'
Publi c Colleges and Uni versi ti es 5 3030
Public Junior Colleges 24 71 7 21 3 9 NL 1
NL
Private Cclleges and Universities 17 77 4 18 1 5 NLNL
Private JuniOr Colleges 5 100-
TOTALS (Sop.' e-81) 62 77 14 17 4 ,
:
7
.r
35 1
..
5
,
8
12
12
40
35
55
60
Credit4(1
4
7
1
20
21
4
A t.V Mr r
NL60-NI
NL12-NI
NL60-NI
NLNL
Public Colleges and Uni versi ties
Public Junior Colleges 12 35 3 9
Private Colleges and Universities 8 36 1 4
Private Junior Colleges 2 40 3
TOTALS (Sample-81) 29 36 5 6 35 43 12 15
9)
:g
0.1 *IMLE II - cont.
Credit b Method No. 4 - ACT
20
Nn RP_No .,_4is43..___1_,No..
15
sp.onse-(4
75 3
(R)_
NL
3-NL15 1
Cred-LLAM.Z____41o...12,L'iulytg_.
5 1 5Public Colleges and Universities
Public Junior Colleges 20 59 7 21 2 6 5 15 186-NL
Private Colleges and Universities 14 64 5 23 1 20 NL
NL
Private Junior Colleges 3 60 1 20 1 20 NL
NL
TOTALS (Sample-81) 52 64 16 20 1 9 6 7
iio_gesponse_CALNo.
10
%
50
Jo.I (B) 1 Credi t Arndt..
% I Nn.
8
AD.
2 10
Rile=
NL
30-NLPub 1 i c Colleges and Uni versi ties 40
Pub I i c Junior Colleges 20 59 5 15 1 3 8 24 186-NL
Private Colleges and Universities 12 55 2 9 5 23 3 14 NL
9-NL
Private Junior Colleges 3 60 2 40 NL
NL
TOTALS (Sample-81) 451 56 7 9 16 20 13 16
_
Credit b Method No. 5a. - CLEP - GeneralIftiolasiannse...1NQ.. ,....:A
12 60
VI- t , No-Credi t Amt.
Publi c Colleges and Uni versities
.
2 10 3 15 3 15 NL24-NL
Public Junior Colleges 23 68 5 15 2 6 4 12 209-NL
Private Colleges and Universities 9 41 1 5 6 27 f 27 NL21-NL
Private Junior Colleges 5 100
TOTALS (Samp1e-81) 49 61 8 10 11 14 13 16
TABLE II - cont.
hv MP thnd un b-TJ -
21
Nil itPcp.onsPAci......r
-11) ----4B-1-11Ccedliaitdil'40
3 151
fetigeNL
1-41_
Public Colleges and Universities lc 50 7 35
Public Junior Colleges 19 56 3 9
5
4
4
12
18
8
2
24
918=tii
166-N1
NL
NLNI
Private Colleges and Universi ties 15 68 1
Private Junior Colleges 4 80 1 20
TOTALS (Sample-81) 48 59 4 5 16 20 13 16
--A. ..
a_Basp.ons- ,.N . .
(B) CreditID a
6 30 30-.12411
ElNo_ 2,'
Public Colleges and Universities 8 40 1 5 5 25
Public Junior Colleges 20 59 5 15 5 15 4
5
12
23
NLar NI
NL) R-11
Private Colleges and Universities I.2 55 5 23
Private Junior Colleges 1 20' 3 60 1 20 NL1-NI
TOTALS (Sample-81) 41 51 6 7 18 22 16 20A
EQAPAPLinse11,--, Z
(A)No..%
15
:
N - Set
1
- .
5
v
30Pub 1 i c Colleges and Uni versi ti es 116 80 3
Public Junior Colleges 26 77 7 21 1 3 NL
Private Colleges and Universities 20 91 2 g .-.
Private Junior Colleges 4 1 20 NLNI
TOTALS (Sample-81) 66 82 f12 15 2 2 1 1.1_
.4
TABLE II - cont. 22
- -An_73.04,ponse
,%__.,_No.
15
... ........,
75
r:=7:4---1- -.-Z
-.7, ii7-1 Adv.a.,
2
v,,,,d.,Ain't..41.
NLA-N1
--No No-
3
__"/.___
15Publ i c Colleges and Uni versiti es 10
Public Junior Collc:os 18 53 4 12 5 15 7 21 24
Private Colleges and Universities 13 59
5
8
1
17
36
20
21
1
10
5
,-6_41L__
12
NL
NLNI-
'Private Junior Colleges 4
50
80
62
1
4TOTALS (Sample-81)
Advanced Standing by Method No. 2 - Certification of Ability by Non-Educational
J.ILL_RespznsPkNo.
19
Z
95
(A)llo.
1
%
5
(B)No.
...._...A.d.v.. 'ti
Public Colleges and Uni versities
Public Junior Colleges 26 77 5
1
15
4
3 9 NL41._
Private Colleges and Universities 21 96
Private Junior Colleges 5 100 -_
TOTALS (Sample-81) 71 88 7 9 3 4
anced StandinaN.Q..2EISAM1S.e..,No. ,..
15
%
75
(A) 01) Mic.40..Mtarail
1
Std.
5
Al
NL66-NL
tin. . % Nn_
4 20Publi c Colleges and Uni versi ties
Public Junior Colleges 24 71 4 12 3
5
9
23
2 9 NL15-NL
Private Colleges and Universities 16 73 1 4
Private Junior Colleges 5 100 NL141_
TOTALS (Sample-81)... .
60 . 74 5 6 12 15 4_ ..
23
TABLE II - cont.
Advanced Standing by Method No. -
IkLalsponse.:-----01J
19 95
(11)
1
_AAL-441Apit
5
o._._.__z____r_ma.a.
Public Colleges and Universities NLN I
Public Junior Colleges 21 62 5 15 3 9 5 15 24
Private Colleges and Universities 18
5
,
82
100
2 9 2 9.
6-NL
NL.11
-
Private Junior Colleges
TOTALS (Sample-81) 63 78 7 9 6 7 5
,
6
Ad .., w ".~6.*Nn 12Pcp0
% No. . % No. % -76.No.
19Public Colleges and Universities
Public Junior Colleges 26 77 2 6 1 3 5 15 ion
Private Colleges and Universities 16
5
73
100
2 9 3 14 1 4 NLNL -
Private Junior Colleges
TOTALS (Sample-81) 66 82 4 5 4 5 7 9
Advanced Standing by Me - CLP -ItoJeporLseJ
16
'I
90
NO. .
1
d S d ..i..Q.:
rdilail
3030
1130. %
5
NO_ Jo
:11 5Public Colleges and Universities
Public Junior Colleges 27 79 3 9 3 9 1 3 NL!-NL
Private Colleges and Universities18 82 1 4 3 14 NLNL
-1
Private Junior Colleges 5 100-
TOTALS (Sample-81) 68. 84 5 6 6 7 2 3
TABLE II - cont.
Adv - CIEP - Sin
24
an_11e.spcins
Jia...._
18
"
90
. 0,tddidii4..
Public Colleges and Universities2 10 17
3-30
Public Junior Colleges 27 79 2 6 1 3 4 12 15
Private Colleges and Universities 15 68 1 5 6 27 NL
Private Junior Colleges 5 100 -
TOTALS (Sample-81) 65 80 3 4 7 9 6 7
Advanced Standina by Method -
lo ResponseNo.
17
%
85
(A)No %
(D)Nn_
1
% AID
5 2
%
10
'Sell
3012-NI
Public Colleges and Universities
Public Junior Colleges 25 74 4
2
12
9
3
3
9
14
2
2
6
9
NL-NI--
141.
A-NI
Private Colleges and Universities 15 68
Private Junior Colleges5 100 .
.
-
TOTALS 4ample41) 62 77 6 7 7 9 6 7
Advanc d Standina by Method No. 7 -
".................._.m._...__.__.ND_Aeugnir_"
19 95
iha.........^4.4-11.0..--.--gcl,
1 5 _
.411n...._.....1
Public Colleges and Universities
Public Junior Colleges 26 77 6 18 2 6 NL_NL
Private Colleges and Universities 22 100
Private Junior Colleges 5 100 -
-
TOTALS (Sample-81) 72 90
.-..-
7 9 2
"-:-
-
TABLE III 25
. .
NO RPC,
2
nnso
IL__
10
YFS
No
NO
No,
6
T
30
4n
XX
_
el,
XXPublic Colleges and Universities 12 60
Public Junior Colleges 6 18 17 50 11 32 XX XX
Private Colleges and Universities 2 9 10 45 10 45 XX XX
Private Junior Colleges 1 20 4 80 XX XX
TOTALS (Sample-81) 11 13 39 48 31 38 XX XX
No Rinponsp YES NO
No. 1 No. I No. I Nn_ t
'Public Colleges and Universities 4 20 14 70 2 10 XX XX
Public Junior Colleges 7 20 22 65 5
-
15 XX XX
Private Colleges and Universities 1 4 18 82 3 14 XX XX
Private-Junior Colleges-- 2 40 3 60 XX XX
TOTALS (Sample-81) 12 15 56 69 13 15 XX XX
No_Response_AO. I No. . t firi_ .jk No 1
Public Colleges and Universities
Public Junior Colleges
,
Private Colleges and Universities
_
Private Junior Colleges
.
TOTALS (Sample-81)
APPENDIX A
N-TEE Inventory
30
.College of EducationTexas Tech University APPENDIX A
26
Higher Educati onJune 26, 1972
INVENTORY OF COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY PRACTICESCONCERNING NON-TRADITIONAL EDUCATIONAL EXPERIENCES (N-TEE)
This is a study of the policies and practices of Texas colleges and universitiesas they (policies and practices) relate to non-traditional educational experiences(N-TEE). In order that we may compile a complete and accurate listing of thecurrent practices of your college regarding N-TEE, will you please follow thedirections in completing this brief inventory. The following glossary is in-cluded to assist you in completing the inventory.
Glossary
N-TEE - Non-Traditional Educational Experiences
Correspondence Instruction - instruction offered through correspondence whichrequires interaction between the student and the instructing institution.In teracti on general ly means submi tting lessons , ass i gnments or tests through
the mail by the student and feedback from the institution to the student onhis performance.
Television -closed circuit - consists of on-campus studios offering instructionusually limited to a single campus.
Commercial ITV - instructional television; that which is arranged forformal instruction in a manner similar to academic courses taught inthe classroom; aired on non-educational stations.
educational ITV - instructional television; that which is arranged forformal instruction in a manner similar to academic courses taught inthe classroom; aired on educational stations.
Independent Study - that part of an institution's instructional program thatallows the student to conduct research, read, or work on his own underfaculty guidance and direction.
CLEP - College-Level Examination Program - achievement examinations awardingcollege credit, sponsored by the College Entrance Examination Board andadministered by the Educational Testing Service.
USAFI - United States Armed Forces Institute - agency which administers atesting program to aid military personnel in obtaining college creditfor knowledge and experience.
GED - General Educational Development - tests used to award high schoolequi valency certi fi cate.
CPEP - College Proficiency Examinations Program - course-oriented testsdeveloped by faculty members teaching at the colleges and universitiesin New York State.
CASE - Commission on Accreditation of Service Experiences - an accreditingbody which formally evaluates the courses and programs offered by thearmed services for col 1 egi ate insti tutions.
31
!kw', jiojleyc ut LuuutionTexas Tech University
27
higher EducaiimJune 26, 1972
Glossary (cont.)
ACT - American College Testing Program, Inc. - The ACT Test Battery
32
College of Education*Pas Tech Uni versi ty
COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY PRACTICESRELATING TO *N-TEE
Respondent
Please complete the following information for identification:
Name of university
Address
Name of college within university
Name of respondent
28111911e1
June 26, 1972
PART I
*N-TEE CATEGORIES*(Non-Traditional Educational Experiences)
If a student can demonstrate an acceptable level of accomplishment acquired fromN-TEE many colleges and universities allow the student credit or advanced stand-ing in his (or her) educational program. In this part of our inventory, we askyou to indicate which of the N-TEE categories you consider for use in educationalprograms. Part II of the inventory surveys methods used to determine acceptablelevels of accomplishments.
Instructions: For each of the 30 items listed place check marks at the left inthe appropriate columns to indicate the use of the following categories of N-TEEby your college. If your response to number one (1) is YES, you mAy. omit nurbers2 thru 26 and continue witiritem No. 27.
Yes No ,Plan to
1 2 I 3
75 3
10 52 2
25 32 6
67 7 3
Note: The sample includes 81 respondents. Because there wereno responses made by some individuals in several categoriesthe responses for each category do not add up to 81.
1. All Non-Traditional Educational Experiences are accepted.
Correspondence
2. private correspondence school3. military correspondence school4. college or uni versi ty correspondence
Existing Competencies from Experience
17 56 4 5. business or industry - e.g., data-processing, bookkeeping,marketing or buying, banking, insurance, secretarial,sa 1 esmanshi p , management
6. trades, -crafts, etc. (apprenticeship) e.g., electrician,cosmetology
20 53 3 7. military - does not include courses - residence (see 21) orcorrespondence (see 3)
10 62, 4 8. engineering - e.g., drafting or surveying4 JO 2 9. agriculture - e.g., farming, ranching, management, animals
4 69 4 10. recreation - e.g., sumer camps, city recreation organization,scouting leadership
:33
C011ege of EducationTexas Tech Universi ty
PART I N-TEE CATEGORIES (cont.)
Yes No Plan to1 2 3
Higher Education 29June 26, 1972
14 54 9 11. health fields - e.g., dental assistant, medical technician,nurse aid, LVN
3 67 5 12. government or politics - e.g., legislative page, electionwork experience
5 60 10 13. social work and education - e.g., counseling, VISTA, PeaceCorps, child care, teacher aid
27 v 3 14. foreign languages - native tongue4 57 0 15. music - e.g., private lessons, self taught, civic orchestra5 64 6 16. drama - e.g., summer stock, comunity theater5 63 6 17. visual arts and crafts - e.g., painting, design, sculpture4 65 6 18. travel
1
4 4 28 62 62 1
47 20
2722
41
70
71
831
1 0 61
Independent Study
19. under competent supervisi on20. unsupervised
Military Servi ce
21. formal resi den ce courses
Television
22. closed circuit instruction on campus23. non-educational stations - ITV (commercial)24. non-educational stations - general educational and cultural
programs (commercial)5 25. educational TV stations - ITV
26. educational TV stations - general educational and culturalprograms
5 64 5
38
35
2 7
22
33 8
36 7
46
4
6
27. Is N-TEE used in the programs of superior students at yourcollege?
28. Is N-TEE used in the programs of average students at yourcollege?
29. Is N-TEE used in the programs of poor students at your college?7 5 30. Do you provide any N-TEE for your students on your campus - e.g. ,
unsupervised independent study, travel, ITV, etc.?31. In the space provided, please indicate N-TEE accepted at your
college not included in the above categories.
4Oilege of EducationTexas Tech University
PART II METHODS AND LIMITATIONS
41.1
Higher Educati on
June 26, 1972
Instructions: This section is included to identify methods used by your collegeto evaluate N-TEE for credit and/or advanced standing.
For each of the items listed under method, used a check mark in column 1, 2, or 3to indicate your response. In columns 4 and 5 circle A to show "no credit allowed,"circle B to show "no credit limit," or enter a number in the blank to show semesterhours credit allowed or "equivalent in semester hours credit" allowed for advancedstanding.
METHOD
1
YES
2
NO
3
PLANTO
4
CREDIT
5
ADVANCEDSTANDING
1. Equivalency exams developedby your college.
52 17 7AB AB
2. Certification of ability bynon-educational organizations
5 54 2 AB_ AB
3. Transfer 549 2AB AB
4. ACT 23 39 4AB AB
5. CLEP 4316 9 AB AB_General 2712 5 AB_ AB_Subject 29 8 9 A B A B
Qualify by CASE norms 8 19 4 XXXXXX XXXXXUXQualify by norms developed by 20 8 3 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
the i nstituti on. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
6. USAFI 40 26 5 A B A B
Qualify by CASE norms 15 10 1 XXXXTXXXXXXWTO X
Qualify by norms developed by 4 11 1 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
the i nstituti on. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
7. CPEP 550 3 AB_ AB_8. GED (Admission of non-high 58 12 2 xxxxxxxxXXXXXXX
school graduates) XXXXXXXXXXXXxXX
9. Is a National Agency to ex- 39 31 xXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXamine and validate experien- xxxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxces desirable? xXX XxXXXXXXXXXXXXX
lO. Is a state-wide conference 56 13 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXof academic officers on N-TEE XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXpolicies and practices de-sirable? al 00)8(MONN
35
APPENDIX B
Population and Respondents of Colleges andUniversities in the N-TEE Survey
31
APPENDIX B
Population and Respondents of Colleges andUniversities in the N-TEE Survey
(* Colleges Participating)
List I Public Colleges and Universities
*Angelo State University-Hugh E. Meredith, Dean
*East Texas State University-Dr. Jerry D. Morris, Dean
Lamar Uni versity-N .H. Kelton , Dean
*Midwestern University-Betty J. Bullock, Registrar
*North Texas State University-E. Douglas Norton
*Pan American University- Homer J. Pena
*Prairie View A & M-Dr. George Ragland, Dean
*Sam Houston State University-Reed Lindsey, Registrar
*Southwest Texas State University-O.L. Dorsey, Dean
*Stephen F. Austin-John T. Lewis
*Sul Ross State University-Delbert A. Dyke, Vice President
Tarleton State Col lege--W.O. Trogdon , President
*Texas A & I-William J. Hall , Registrar
*Texas A & M-H.L. Heaton, Dean of Admissions
*Texas Southern University--J.E. Westberry
*Texas Tech University-Derwood Peterson, Registrar
*Texas Woman's University-John E. Tompkins, Registrar
*University of Texas at Arlington-R. Zack Prince, Registrar
*University of Texas at Austin-R. Rex Jackson, Associate Director
University of Texas at El Paso-Shumaker, Registrar
*University of Texas of the Permian Basin-Virginia R. Cardozier
*Universi ty of Nous ton-Gene Atkinson Assistant Dean of Faculties
*West Texas State University-Ray A. Malzahn, Vice President for Academic Affairs
.37
(Appendix B, cont.) 32
List II Publi c Junior Colleges
*Al vi n Junior Col lege-M.B. Johns tone
*Amarillo College-Joe W . Test
Angel ina College-Henry E. McCullough
*Bee County College-Dr. Frtiz Oelrich
*Blinn College-Henry J. Boehm, Dean
*Brazosport College-Robert S. Montgomery
*Central Texas College-Registrar
*Cisco Junior College-Mr. Carroll Scott
*Clarendon College-Tex Selvidge
*College of the Mainland-S. Calvert, Dean
Cooke Country Junior College-Registrar
Eastfield College-Mr. Wilbur Dennis
El Centro College-Registrar
Mountain View College-Ken Thomas
*Del Mar College-Dr. Aaron Seamster, Vice President
*Frank Phillips College, Dr. R.E. Darnell , Academic Dean
*Gal ves ton Col lege-Carl W. Cook , Registrar
*Grayson County College-Cruce Stark, President
*Henderson County Junior College-Mrs. Christine Simmons, Registrar
*Hill Junior College-Louis N. Allen, Registrar
*Howard County Junior College-Dr. Charles Hays
Kilgore College-Registrar
*Laredo Junior College-Michael Saenz
Lee College-John McCormick
*McLennan Comunity College-Chester R. Hastin, Vice President of Academic Affairs
*Navarro Junior College-Ben W. Jones
Panola College-Miss Martha Miller, Registrar
'38
(Appendi x B cont. )
List II, cont.
Paris Junior College-Mrs. L.C. Johnson, Registrar
*Odessa Col lege-Ral ph G. Mi 1 ler
*Midland College-C. C. Daki 1
*Ranger Junior College-R.B. Gokmon
San Antonio College-P.R. Culwell
St. Phi lip's College-Don A. Coleman, Registrar
*San Jacinto Col l ege-O.W. Marconi
*South Plains College-Charles Sylvester, Registrar
Southwest Texas Junior College-Jimmy Goodson
*Northeast Campus-Jim O'Dell
*South Campus-M. Dan McLallen
*Temple Junior College-Charles Stout, Registrar
*Texarkana College-Levi Hall, Dean
*Texas Southmost Onllege-Robert L. Phillips , Jr.
*T,yler Col 1 ege-J. H . McClendon , Regi strar
Vernon Regional Junior College-Registrar
Victori a College-Louise Hume Regi strar
*Weatherford College-James T. Barnett
*Western Texas College-Dr. Duane Hood, Registrar
*Wharton County Junior College-Dr. Ora E. Roades
List III Private Colleges and Universities
*Abilene Christian College-Clint /loath, Director of Admission
Austin Col,lege-Dr. Dan T. Bedsole, Provost
Baylor University-Van D. Massirer, Registrar
*Bishop College-Ri chard A. Rollins
*Dallas Baptist College-Weldon L. Estes
*Dominican College-Sister M. De Lourdes Warren, O.P.
:35
33
(Appendix B, cont.)
List III cont.
*East Texas Baptist College-Joe T. Mason, Academic Dean
*Hardin-Simons University-William 0. Beazley
*Howard Payne College-William D. Jackson
Houston Baptist College-Losier, Registrar
*Houston-Tillotson College-John T. King
Incarnate Word College-St. Margaret Patrice Slattery
*Jarvis Christian College-John P. Jones
*LeTournea College-John W. Stuber, Registrar
*Mary Hardin-Baylor College-Dr. William J. Anderson
*Mc Murry College-C.W. Tarter, Vice President for Academic Affairs
Northwood Institute-Registrar
*Our Lady of the Lake College-Mrs. Loretta A. Schegel, Registrar
Paul Quinn College-Dr. L.C. Wood
St. Mary's Universi ty-Thomas Tarri; lion
*St. Edward's University-John Lucas
South Texas College-Robert Mulcahy, Dean
Southern Methodist University-Don L. Renner, Registrar
Southwestern University-Grady Anderson
*Southwestern Union College-K.F. Vonhof
*Texas Christian University-Calvin A. Cumbie, Registrar
Texas College-D.H. McClendon, Registrar
*Texas Lutheran College-M.R. Jaroszewski, Registrar
*Texas Wesleyan College-Donald E. Carter, Registrar
*Trinity University-Walter P. West
*University of Corpus Christi-Registrar
*University of Dallas-Sister Mary Margaret O'Connell , Registrar
-University of St. Thomas-Registrar
34
Ni* It., (Appendix B, cont.) 35
List III cont.
*Wayland Baptist College-Audrey H. Boles, Registrar
Wiley Col lege-Arzie Sanders, Registrar
Rice Uni versi ty-James C. Morehead Jr. , Regi strar
List IV Private Junior Colleges
Allen Academy-Registrar
Butler College-Registrar
Christian College of the Southwest-John Losher, Registrar
Concordia College-Ronald Trampe, Registrar
Fort Worth Christian College-Registrar
*Gulf Coast Bible College-Registrar
*Lon Morris College-Registrar
*Jacksonvi I le College-Registrar
Mary Allen College-Registrar
Schreiner I nsti tute-Registrar
*South Texas Junior College-Ross W. Tooh
*Southern Bible College-Dr. Donald A. Bass, Registrar
*Southwestern Junior College-Jerry Sheppard
Southwestern Christian College-James Maxwell
Westminster College-Registrar
The following two institutions responded by letter to indicate thattheir policies were not developed sufficiently to be included i n thiss tudy:
Uni versity of Texas at Dallas-Registrar
University of Texas at San Antonio-Registrar