District Assessment & Accountability Data

Board of Education ReportSeptember 6, 2011

Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services

State Testing and Reporting (STAR)

California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE)

Academic Performance Index (API)

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

2

Agenda California Standards Tests (CST) Results

Spring 2011 5-year comparison

California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE) Results 10th Grade 2011 results compared to State results 3-year comparison

State Accountability: Academic Performance Index (API) 5-year trend data & growth School performance

Federal Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) AYP Targets District Performance

3

STAR 2011 Group Performance – California Standards Test (CST)

16

12

5

7

2

4

9

7

7

6

6

4

19

14

24

14

15

15

22

25

30

21

33

27

34

42

35

53

44

51

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

W. History (10)

History (8, 11)

Science (9-11)

Science (5, 8, 10)

Math (2-11)

ELA (2-11)

Far Below Basic Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced

78%

77%

74%

65%

67%

56%

4

STAR Multi-Year Performance Level Distribution

2 3 3 3 45 5 5 5 4

16 15 14 15 15

31 31 30 27 27

45 46 49 50 51

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

% of

stud

ents

in ea

ch pe

rform

ance

leve

l

English/Language Arts

1 1 2 2 26 8 7 6 6

1313 14 15 15

34 32 31 31 33

45 46 46 46 44

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Advanced

Proficient

Basic

Below Basic

Far BB

Mathematics

5

STAR Multi-Year Performance Level Distribution

5 5 6 5 6

5 56 7 6

1815

18 20 19

35

3125

25 25

38

45 45 44 44

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Science Biology

410

3 4

9

7

58

2220

2321

3829

31 25

2734

3742

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Advanced

Proficient

Basic

Below Basic

Far BB

6

STAR Multi-Year Performance Level Distribution

7 610 11 13

8 106 6

8

20 21 1820

16

3125

2526 24

3339 41

37 39

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2006-07 n = 218 2007-08 n = 246 2008-09 n = 490 2009-10 n = 782 2010-11 n = 896

% of

stude

nts in

each

perfo

rman

ce lev

el

History

12 13 16

67

9

15

21

19

25

27 22

43

32 34

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2008-09 n = 242 2009-10 n = 287 2010-11 n = 307

% of

stude

nts in

each

perfo

rman

ce lev

el

Advanced

Proficient

Basic

Below Basic

Far BB

World History

7

CAHSEE – 10th Grade ELACompared to State

90

76

91

84

96

70

0

74

82

74

88

74

70

41

73

40

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

District African American Asian Hispanic White English Learner SocioEco Disadv Special Ed

District State

8

CAHSEE – 10th Grade MathCompared to State

97

86

99

87

99

90

0

88

83

65

95

75

90

41

73

40

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

District African American Asian Hispanic White English Learner SocioEco Disadv Special Ed

District State

9

CAHSEE ELAThree-Year Comparison

9396

8790

98

50

80

0

94

85

94

86

99

80

0

8890

76

91

84

96

70

0

74

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

District African American Asian Hispanic White English Learner SocioEco Disadv Special Ed

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

10

CAHSEE MathThree-Year Comparison

94

73

96

88

100

82

90

0

95

86

98

86

98

94

89

76

97

86

99

87

99

90

0

88

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

District African American Asian Hispanic White English Learner SocioEco Disadv* Special Ed

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

11

State Accountability:Academic Performance Index

(API)

GOAL: All schools and districts will achieve the statewide performance target of 800 or above.

12

State Accountability: Academic Performance Index (API)

What is the API? Growth (CST, CMA, CAPA) model

Far Below Basic 200 Below Basic 500 (+300) Basic 700 (+200) Proficient 875 (+175) Advanced 1000 (+125)

CAHSEE No Pass 200 Pass 1000 (+800)

What does the API Indicate?

13

Academic Performance Index2010-11

BASE GROWTH ∆

District 877 881 +4

African American 743 739 -4

American Indian n/a n/a n/a

Asian 912 914 +2

Filipino n/a n/a n/a

Hispanic 794 787 -7

Pacific Islander n/a n/a n/a

White 898 915 +17

Socio Economically Disadvantaged 798 773 -25

English Learner 836 851 +15

Special Education 653 665 +12

14

Academic Performance Index 5 Year Growth

-2

-10

1413

4

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

1

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-111

15

Academic Performance Index 5 Year Growth – Significant Sub-Groups

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000

Spec Ed

English Learner

SocioEcon Disadv

White

Hispanic

Asian

African American

District

Sig

nif

ican

t su

bg

rou

ps

API score

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

16

Academic Performance IndexSchools

Cornell Elementary 918 +27

Marin Elementary 947 +4

Ocean View Elementary 901 -12

Albany Middle 887 -4

Albany High 853 +5

MacGregor 465* +62*

17

Federal Accountability:Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

GOAL: 100% of all students tested will be proficient in English-Language Arts and Mathematics by 2014.

18

Adequate Yearly Progress

There is ONE way to make AYP. District/school and all sub-groups meet all targets

There are up to 46 different ways for a school or district to miss AYP. Participation Rate

Up to 11 sub-groups in ELA and up to 11 sub-groups in Math for a total of 22 ways

Percent Proficient Up to 11 sub-groups in ELA and up to 11 sub-groups in

Math for a total of 22 ways API - Additional indicator for AYP Graduation Rate at the high school level

19

AYP Targets English Language Arts

100.0%

12.0% 12.0% 12.0%

23.0% 23.0% 23.0%

34.%

45.0%

56.0%

89.0%

78.0%

67.0%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

2001

-02

2002

-03

2003

-04

2004

-05

2005

-06

2006

-07

2007

-08

2008

-09

2009

-10

2010

-11

2011

-12

2012

-13

2013

-14

Per

cen

t P

rofi

cien

t

20

AYP Targets Mathematics

100.0%

12.8% 12.8% 12.8%

23.7% 23.7% 23.7%

34.6%

45.5%

56.4%

89.1%

78.2%

67.3%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

2001

-02

2002

-03

2003

-04

2004

-05

2005

-06

2006

-07

2007

-08

2008

-09

2009

-10

2010

-11

2011

-12

2012

-13

2013

-14

Per

cen

t P

rofi

cien

t

21

Federal Accountability: AYP

What is AYP? Status Model

Students must reach proficiency

How is AYP determined? Elementary & Middle School: STAR in ELA and Math High School: CAHSEE

380 Scaled Score instead of 350 API: Minimum of 680 Graduation Rate: One year delayed

22

English Language Arts

56.8% 67.6%0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Special Ed

SocioEco Disadv*

English Learner

White

Hispanic

Asian

African American

District

% proficient and above

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

67% 78%

23

Mathematics

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Special Ed

SocioEco Disadv*

English Learner

White

Hispanic

Asian

African American

District

% proficient and above

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

67.3% 78.2%

24

Adequate Yearly Progress District met participation rates Percent proficient – did not meet AYP targets in

the following subgroups:

API – Met Graduation Rate – Met (target: 86.4%)

2009-10 89.66%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS•African American

•Socio Economically Disadvantaged

MATHEMATICS•African American•Hispanic

25

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Summary

Albany Unified School District met 30 of 34 AYP criteria Did not make AYP for 2 years in a row (but different

subgroups)

Two schools (out of five) made AYP Cornell Elementary Marin Elementary

26

SummaryCST

AUSD continues to be a high-performing district with high-performing schools and students

However, over 20% of our students score at Basic or below in ELA and Math

That percentage rises in Science and History/Social Science

27

Summary, continuedCAHSEE

AUSD exceeds the State in CAHSEE passage rates in both ELA and Math

Performance fell slightly for all subgroups in ELA in2011

Performance held or increased slightly for all subgroups in Math (except English Learners)

28

Summary, continuedAPI

AUSD has shown steady growth for the past three consecutive years, which tapered off slightly for 2011

Many subgroups lost ground in 2011

A few subgroups grew (ELs and Spec Ed)

API went up for 4 out of 6 schools

29

Summary, continuedAYP AUSD has made small, steady progress in %

proficient or above overall

Subgroups are showing some gains, some losses (no apparent pattern)

Two subgroups met AYP through Safe Harbor Spec Ed in ELA and Mathematics SED in Mathematics

One school (AMS) has entered Program Improvement, Year 1