disseminated neoplasia in ostrea...
TRANSCRIPT
Disseminated Disseminated NeoplasiaNeoplasiain in OstreaOstrea conchaphilaconchaphila
Jim Moore, Christy Jim Moore, Christy JuhaszJuhasz, , TheaThea RobbinsRobbinsCDFG Shellfish Health LaboratoryCDFG Shellfish Health Laboratory
Bodega Marine Laboratory, Bodega Bay CABodega Marine Laboratory, Bodega Bay [email protected]@ucdavis.edu
707 875707 875--20672067
Site Species Shell height Collection DateCrescent City- Inner Harbor Crassostrea gigas 22-39mm 3/8/2005Crescent City- Inner Harbor Crassostrea sikamea 16-31mm 3/8/2005Crescent City- Outer Harbor C. gigas + C. sikamea 11-19mm 3/8/2005Crescent City- Inner Harbor Crassostrea gigas 48-95mm 10/12/2005Crescent City- Inner Harbor Crassostrea sikamea 12-55mm 10/12/2005Humboldt Bay- Mad River Estuary Crassostrea gigas 75-110mm 2/15/2004Humboldt Bay- Mad River Estuary Ostrea conchaphila 46-65mm 2/16/2004Humboldt Bay- Mad River Estuary Crassostrea gigas 142-281mm 2/15/2004Humboldt Bay- Samoa Bridge Crassostrea gigas 10-20mm 2/17/2004Humboldt Bay- Bird Island Crassostrea gigas 117-165mm 2/22/2004Humboldt Bay- Sand Island Crassostrea gigas 137-229mm 3/2/2004Tomales Bay- North End Crassostrea gigas 103-192mm 3/14/2004Tomales Bay- North End Crassostrea virginica 46-68mm 7/8/2004Tomales Bay- North End Crassostrea sikamea 63-92mm 7/8/2004Tomales Bay- North End Ostrea edulis 54-105mm 10/7/2005Tomales Bay- North End Crassostrea virginica 57-93mm 10/7/2005Tomales Bay- South End Ostrea conchaphila 36-64mm 4/20/2004Tomales Bay- South End Crassostrea gigas 122-265mm 4/20/2004Tomales Bay- North End Ostrea conchaphila 37-54mm 8/31/2004Drake's Estero Crassostrea gigas 76-99mm 7/8/2004Drake's Estero Ostrea conchaphila 38-58mm 7/8/2004China Camp, SF Bay Mya arenaria 48-78mm 4/15/2004Fort Mason Marina, SF Bay Ostrea conchaphila 22-35mm 6/?/2006Candlestick Park, SF Bay Ostrea conchaphila 9-40mm 1/21/2005Dumbarton Bridge area, SF Bay Crassostrea gigas 73-184mm 8/8/2006Sailing Lake, Mountain View Ostrea conchaphila 17-86mm 1/25 and 2/9/05Elkhorn Slough Ostrea conchaphila 38-70mm 5/26/2004Morro Bay Crassostrea gigas 34-64mm 8/3/2004Morro Bay Crassostrea gigas 75-235mm 8/3/2004Morro Bay Crassostrea gigas 73-108mm 5/25/2005Morro Bay Crassostrea gigas 39-55mm 5/25/2005Morro Bay Crassostrea sikamea 32-56mm 5/25/2005Santa Barbara (offshore lease) Crassostrea gigas 90-150mm 7/21/2004Ports of Call, San Pedro Crassostrea gigas 74-129mm 1/24/2005
Disseminated Disseminated neoplasianeoplasia in bivalvesin bivalves
Occurrence in native oystersOccurrence in native oysters
Epidemiology in Epidemiology in MytilusMytilus and and MyaMya
Potential implications for native oyster restorationPotential implications for native oyster restoration
San Francisco Bay San Francisco Bay C. C. gigasgigas health exam and health exam and
reproductive statusreproductive status
Bivalve Disseminated Bivalve Disseminated NeoplasiaNeoplasia
Large, undifferentiated cells with large nuclei Large, undifferentiated cells with large nuclei proliferate throughout the open circulatory systemproliferate throughout the open circulatory system
Rare and best example of ‘cancer’ in a marine Rare and best example of ‘cancer’ in a marine invertebrateinvertebrate
Remarkably similar in 20 + speciesRemarkably similar in 20 + species
Emaciation, diminished reproduction, usually fatalEmaciation, diminished reproduction, usually fatal
Epidemics and steady statesEpidemics and steady states
What is the Cause of this Disease?What is the Cause of this Disease?
Spontaneous transformationSpontaneous transformation
VirusVirus
Chemical carcinogenesisChemical carcinogenesis
Harmful algae (PSP toxins)Harmful algae (PSP toxins)
Disseminated Disseminated NeoplasiaNeoplasia is is
Transmissible Within SpeciesTransmissible Within Species
Transmission by injection of (intact) Transmission by injection of (intact)
neoplasticneoplastic cells and by cohabitation cells and by cohabitation
Cells probably transplanted between Cells probably transplanted between
individualsindividuals
Operationally similar to a protozoan parasiteOperationally similar to a protozoan parasite
Disseminated Disseminated NeoplasiaNeoplasiain West Coast Bivalvesin West Coast Bivalves
Mussels, Mussels, MytilusMytilus trossulustrossulus in in Oregon, Oregon, Washington, & British ColumbiaWashington, & British Columbia
SoftSoft--shell clams, shell clams, MyaMya arenariaarenaria in Oregon in Oregon
Native oysters, Native oysters, OstreaOstrea conchaphilaconchaphila
Disseminated Disseminated NeoplasiaNeoplasia in in OstreaOstrea conchaphilaconchaphila
YaquinaYaquina Bay, Oregon ~1969Bay, Oregon ~1969--1970s1970s
SF Bay, California 2001, 2004SF Bay, California 2001, 2004
TomalesTomales Bay, California 2004Bay, California 2004
Washington: Not reportedWashington: Not reported
British Columbia: Not reportedBritish Columbia: Not reported
Disseminated Disseminated NeoplasiaNeoplasia in California in California OstreaOstrea conchaphilaconchaphila, 2004, 2004--66
SiteShell Height Range, mm Collection Date Substrate
Disseminated Neoplasia
Humboldt Bay- Mad River Estuary 46-65 Feb 2004 Oyster Raft 0/60Tomales Bay- North End 37-55 Aug 2004 Cobble/Rocks 2/60 (3%)Tomales Bay- South End 36-64 April 2004 Oyster Racks 0/60Drake's Estero 10-58 July 2004 C. gigas shell 27/63 (43%)Fort Mason Marina, SF Bay 22-35 June 2006 Rock 1/60 (1.6%)Candlestick Park, SF Bay 9-40 Jan 2005 Cobble/Rocks 13/48 (27%)Sailing Lake, Mountain View 17-86 Jan-Feb 2005 - 0/72Elkhorn Slough 38-71 May 2004 Cobble/Rocks 0/60
SiteEarly< 20%
Moderate20-79%
Advanced≥ 80%
Tomales Bay- North End 2 0 0Drake's Estero 15 9 3Fort Mason Marina, SF Bay 1 0 0Candlestick Park, SF Bay 4 6 3
IntensitiesIntensities
Epidemiology in Epidemiology in M. M. trossulustrossulus
Up to 60% prevalence in BC, WA, OR and BalticUp to 60% prevalence in BC, WA, OR and Baltic
Affects all age classes (including 30d, 2mm)Affects all age classes (including 30d, 2mm)
Key source of mortality in cultured population:Key source of mortality in cultured population:
> 80% of recruits die before ‘market’ size, > 80% of recruits die before ‘market’ size, 81% associated with DN81% associated with DN
Prevalence & intensity:Prevalence & intensity:
Positive correlation with mussel density, elevated Positive correlation with mussel density, elevated temperaturetemperature
Negative correlation with water circulationNegative correlation with water circulation
Epidemiology in Atlantic Epidemiology in Atlantic MyaMya arenariaarenaria
New England:New England:
Prevalence variable, up to 45% since 1972 discoveryPrevalence variable, up to 45% since 1972 discovery
Chesapeake Bay: Chesapeake Bay:
19691969--1978 1978 0/3620/362
19791979--19831983 4/2504/250
19831983--19881988 Prevalence up to 76%, correlated with Prevalence up to 76%, correlated with mortality mortality
20002000 Prevalence 3Prevalence 3--37%, populations 2% of peak37%, populations 2% of peak
Atlantic Canada: Atlantic Canada:
19901990--1998 1998 <13% <13%
19991999 Mass mortalities, with DN prevalence >95%Mass mortalities, with DN prevalence >95%
Restoration Implications of Disseminated Restoration Implications of Disseminated NeoplasiaNeoplasia in in OstreaOstrea conchaphilaconchaphila
Probable significant cause of mortality and Probable significant cause of mortality and diminished reproduction in some native oyster diminished reproduction in some native oyster populationspopulations
Highly variable over space (and time?) Highly variable over space (and time?)
Potential limiting factor in restorationPotential limiting factor in restoration
Transfers should be restrictedTransfers should be restricted
50/59 Ripe Females50/59 Ripe Females
1/59 Spawned Female1/59 Spawned Female
7/59 7/59 ResorbingResorbing FemalesFemales
1/59 Indeterminate1/59 Indeterminate
7 with 7 with CiliatesCiliates
CiliatesCiliates
CiliatesCiliates
AcknowledgementsAcknowledgements
California oyster farmersCalifornia oyster farmers
California Sea Grant CollegeCalifornia Sea Grant College
California State Coastal ConservancyCalifornia State Coastal Conservancy
California Department of Fish & GameCalifornia Department of Fish & Game