discovery of long-lived sleptons @ the lhc bryan smith west coast theory network university of...
Post on 20-Dec-2015
213 views
TRANSCRIPT
Discovery of Long-Lived Sleptons
@The LHC
Bryan SmithWest Coast Theory NetworkUniversity of California, Irvine
4th May 2007
Work with Jonathan Feng, Arvind Rajaraman, and Mario Bondioli
Meta-Stable Charged Particles are Generic
Fe
ng
& M
oro
i
Ce
mb
ran
os,
Fe
ng
, a
nd
Str
iga
ri
Fe
ng
,Ra
jara
ma
n,
BT
S lsp lsp
Meta-stable Charged Particles Not Heavily Studied
Discounted because of cosmology, SuperWIMPs evade constraintMeta-Stable Particles have long lifetimes
Decay to super weakly interacting particle (ie. Gravitino, Axino,…)
Offers spectacular signals at collidersCharged tracks leaving detector (life times are long)
Easy to see (Will show you just how easy)
How to Discover
Long lived Sleptons look like heavy muonsNo Hadronic InteractionCharged TracksExit Detector
Long Lived Sleptons look different than muonsDifferent IonizationDifferent Velocity for given momentum
Background is from muon mismeasurementsTime Delay resolutionIonization
Drell-Yan Angular DistributionScalar or Fermion?
Model A Model B Number of Events Needed 22 27 Luminosity Estimate 1.5 fb-1 7.6fb-1
We can go back to the center of mass
For R = 104
Conclusions?
Sleptons can be discovered in first physics runSearches require computer time for reconstructionPriority over missing energy searches?
Estimates suggest spin can be determined after first runestimates are naïve (hopeful for model A)more detailed analysis needs to be doneusing angular distributions from cascades viable optionbeing more clever?
Many Experimental Concerns for serious PhenomenologyCan the experiment measure what you want?
Can the experiment measure what you want?
Time Delay
Time Delay is not measured in event (At ATLAS…CMS?)
reconstructed from event datarequires computer timesomeone has to find the data to reconstruct (can you reconstruct all?)
Is Time Delay resolution 1ns? Better? Worse?
Atlas notes estimate resolution is better, but not clear on the process Conversation with ATLAS collaborators suggest resolution better
Still not clear where time delay comes from
Can the experiment measure what you want?
Momentum Measurement
Momentum measurement at ATLAS designed for ~ 1
track reconstruction error? Slow moving = longer drift time = longer distancesome ATLAS notes talk about measuring momentum b ~ 0.6ATLAS collaborators suggest slow moving = random momentum measurementtrigger different than momentum measurementHow different is this from muon momentum resolution?
Can the experiment measure what you want?
IonizationMuons and Sleptons have different ionization
ATLAS measures high/low threshold hitMuon can have transition radiationCan we distinguish between the two if both give the similar high/low distribution?
-: p=100GeV/c~- p=100GeV/c
m=200GeV/c2
Plots thanks to Mario
Conclusions IIResults depend on momentum and time delay measurements
Can these observable be measured accurately?Our Discover results can change drastically based on real measurements
What we want vs. what we getHow are non-standard models seen in detector?Detector was not designed for slow moving muons (not interesting?)Was the detectors designed to see your observables?
How adaptable are the detectors?Detector is builtIs there information measured but not recorded?Can we change/add information written to tape?
Which schemes work best for your model?
Drell-Yan and Cascade CutsRequire two charged tracks leaving the muon system
reduction of single SM muon backgroundcan use invariant mass to reduce Z di-muon background
Require that both tracks have a rapidity less than 2.4necessary for triggering the detector with sleptons
Require both tracks are isolated (less than 10 GeV in a cone with R < 0.2)reduces top and QCD backgroundseparates from R-hadrons
Both Particles must have momentum greater than 100GeVmuons will exhibit transition radiation in TRT (not used)sleptons will have this minimum momentum from trigger requirements
Drell-Yan: Invariant Mass must be larger than 120 GeVCascade Only: 4 energetic objects with transverse energy greater than 70 GeV