dark matter detection in space jonathan feng uc irvine spacepart 03, washington, dc 10 december 2003

24
Dark Matter Detection in Space Jonathan Feng UC Irvine SpacePart 03, Washington, DC 10 December 2003

Upload: sheryl-thornton

Post on 21-Jan-2016

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Dark Matter Detection in Space Jonathan Feng UC Irvine SpacePart 03, Washington, DC 10 December 2003

Dark Matter Detection in Space

Jonathan Feng

UC Irvine

SpacePart 03, Washington, DC

10 December 2003

Page 2: Dark Matter Detection in Space Jonathan Feng UC Irvine SpacePart 03, Washington, DC 10 December 2003

10 December 2003 SpacePart 03 Feng 2

Dark Matter

• We live in interesting times:– We know there is dark matter, and how much– We have no idea what it is

• This talk: Recent developments with a focus on implications for space-based experiments

• The Wild, Wild West of particle physics:– Neutralinos, axions, Kaluza-Klein DM, Q balls,

wimpzillas, superWIMPs, self-interacting DM, warm and fuzzy DM,…

Page 3: Dark Matter Detection in Space Jonathan Feng UC Irvine SpacePart 03, Washington, DC 10 December 2003

10 December 2003 SpacePart 03 Feng 3

A Selection Rule: DM and the Weak Scale

• Universe cools, leaves a residue of dark matter with DM ~ 0.1 (Weak/) – remarkable!

• 13 Gyr later, Martha Stewart sells ImClone stock – the next day, stock plummets

Coincidence? Maybe, but worth investigating!

time

Freeze outSto

ck p

rice

($)

ExponentialdropExponential

drop

Freeze out

Page 4: Dark Matter Detection in Space Jonathan Feng UC Irvine SpacePart 03, Washington, DC 10 December 2003

10 December 2003 SpacePart 03 Feng 4

Neutralino Dark MatterGoldberg (1983) Ellis et al. (1983)

• Predicted by supersymmetry, motivated by particle physics considerations

• One of many new supersymmetric particles

Page 5: Dark Matter Detection in Space Jonathan Feng UC Irvine SpacePart 03, Washington, DC 10 December 2003

10 December 2003 SpacePart 03 Feng 5

Spin

U(1) SU(2) Up-type Down-type

2 G

graviton

3/2

1 B W 0

1/2

0 Hd

SUSY Particles

Neutralinos:

Spin

U(1)

M1

SU(2)

M2

Up-type

Down-type

m m3/2

2 G

graviton

3/2 G

gravitino

1 B W 0

1/2 B

Bino

W 0

Wino

Hu

Higgsino

HdHiggsino

0 Hu Hd

sneutrino

Page 6: Dark Matter Detection in Space Jonathan Feng UC Irvine SpacePart 03, Washington, DC 10 December 2003

10 December 2003 SpacePart 03 Feng 6

Neutralino Properties

Mass: ~ 100 GeV

Interactions: weak (neutrino-like)

The “typical” WIMP (but note: neutralinos are Majorana fermions – they are their own anti-particle)

• Direct detection: see Matchev’s talk

• Indirect detection: annihilationin the halo to e’s: AMS-02, PAMELA…

in the center of the galaxy to ’s: GLAST, AMS/, telescopes,…

in the center of the Sun to ’s: AMANDA, NESTOR, ANTARES,…

Page 7: Dark Matter Detection in Space Jonathan Feng UC Irvine SpacePart 03, Washington, DC 10 December 2003

10 December 2003 SpacePart 03 Feng 7

PositronsTurner, Wilczek (1990)

Kamionkowski, Turner (1991)

• The signal: hard positrons

• Best hope: e+e

• Problem: are Majorana-like, so Pauli Jinit = 0

e e

This process is highly suppressed

Page 8: Dark Matter Detection in Space Jonathan Feng UC Irvine SpacePart 03, Washington, DC 10 December 2003

10 December 2003 SpacePart 03 Feng 8

• Next best hope: WW, ZZ e+…

• Problem: conventional wisdom in simple models, ≈ Bino, does not couple to SU(2) gauge bosons

We are left with soft e+: bb ce+…

Page 9: Dark Matter Detection in Space Jonathan Feng UC Irvine SpacePart 03, Washington, DC 10 December 2003

10 December 2003 SpacePart 03 Feng 9

Photons

• ≈ Bino also suppresses the photon signal

• Best hope: – highly suppressed

• Next best hope: W+W, ZZ – also suppressed

[Both e+ and signals are sensitive to cuspiness, clumpiness in the halo.]

Urban et al. (1992)Berezinsky, Gurevich, Zybin (1992)

Page 10: Dark Matter Detection in Space Jonathan Feng UC Irvine SpacePart 03, Washington, DC 10 December 2003

10 December 2003 SpacePart 03 Feng 10

Example: Minimal Supergravity

Relic density regions and Bino-ness (%)• A simple model incorporating unification

≈ Bino in the

0.1 < DM < 0.3 region

• But not always!

= Bino-Higgsino mixture in “focus point region”

Feng, Matchev, Wilczek (2000)

Page 11: Dark Matter Detection in Space Jonathan Feng UC Irvine SpacePart 03, Washington, DC 10 December 2003

10 December 2003 SpacePart 03 Feng 11

SUSY WIMP DetectionSynergy: Particle probesDark matter detection

Recent data:• mh > 115 GeV• B(bs) ~ SM• (g2) ~ SM (maybe)• DM low (red region)

Conclusion: indirect detection favored

(valid beyond mSUGRA)

Page 12: Dark Matter Detection in Space Jonathan Feng UC Irvine SpacePart 03, Washington, DC 10 December 2003

10 December 2003 SpacePart 03 Feng 12

Extra Dimensional Dark Matter

• Extra dimensions generically predict Kaluza-Klein particles with mass n/R. What are they good for?

• If R ~ TeV-1, the lightest KK particle may be a WIMP

• Consider B1, the first partner of the hypercharge gauge boson

Page 13: Dark Matter Detection in Space Jonathan Feng UC Irvine SpacePart 03, Washington, DC 10 December 2003

10 December 2003 SpacePart 03 Feng 13

Positrons

• Here fi(E0) ~ (E0mB1). Is the peak is erased by propagation?

Moskalenko, Strong (1999)

• Recall in SUSY:

e+e suppressed by angular momentum

• But B1 has spin 1

• B1B1 ee is large, ~20% of all annihilations

Page 14: Dark Matter Detection in Space Jonathan Feng UC Irvine SpacePart 03, Washington, DC 10 December 2003

10 December 2003 SpacePart 03 Feng 14

Positrons from KK Dark MatterCheng, Feng, Matchev (2002)

Precision data dark matter discovery and mass measurement

Page 15: Dark Matter Detection in Space Jonathan Feng UC Irvine SpacePart 03, Washington, DC 10 December 2003

10 December 2003 SpacePart 03 Feng 15

SuperWIMP Dark Matter

• Both SUSY and extra dimensions predict partner particles for all known particles. What about the gravitino G or the 1st graviton excitation G1?

• G and G1 interact only gravitationally, but that’s sufficient for dark matter

• Consider G; the G1 case is identical up to O(1) factors

Page 16: Dark Matter Detection in Space Jonathan Feng UC Irvine SpacePart 03, Washington, DC 10 December 2003

10 December 2003 SpacePart 03 Feng 16

• G LSP

• Qualitatively new cosmology

Gravitinos from Late Decay• Assume gravitinos are diluted by inflation, and the universe

reheats to low temperature.

• G not LSP

• No impact – implicit assumption of most of literature

SM

LSPG

SM

NLSP

G

Page 17: Dark Matter Detection in Space Jonathan Feng UC Irvine SpacePart 03, Washington, DC 10 December 2003

10 December 2003 SpacePart 03 Feng 17

• Early universe behaves as usual, WIMP freezes out with desired thermal relic density

• A year passes…then all WIMPs decay to gravitinos

Gravitinos from Late Decay

WIMP≈G

Gravitinos naturally inherit WIMP density,but are superweakly-interacting – “superWIMPs”

MPl2/MW

3 ~ year

Page 18: Dark Matter Detection in Space Jonathan Feng UC Irvine SpacePart 03, Washington, DC 10 December 2003

10 December 2003 SpacePart 03 Feng 18

SuperWIMP Detection

• SuperWIMPs evade all conventional dark matter searches

• The only possible signal: WIMP superWIMP decays in the early universe

• Decay time is sensitive to

m = mWIMP – msWIMP

Feng, Rajaraman, Takayama (2003)

gravitino graviton

msWIMP = 0.1, 0.3, 1 TeV (from below)

Page 19: Dark Matter Detection in Space Jonathan Feng UC Irvine SpacePart 03, Washington, DC 10 December 2003

10 December 2003 SpacePart 03 Feng 19

Gravitino Cosmology: Detection• For m ~ O(100 GeV), WIMP superWIMP decays

occur before CMB and after BBN. This can be tested.

Cyburt, Fields, Olive (2003)Fields, Sarkar, PDG (2002)

WMAP

D = CMB

[7Li low]

Baryometry

Page 20: Dark Matter Detection in Space Jonathan Feng UC Irvine SpacePart 03, Washington, DC 10 December 2003

10 December 2003 SpacePart 03 Feng 20

• Signals are determined by WIMP: e.g., B → G ,…

• mWIMP , mG determine

Decay time: X

Energy release: EM = m nG / n

(G = DM)

• Large energy release destroys successes of BBN

• But G DM is allowed and low 7Li may even be superWIMP signal

G Signals: BBN

Cyburt, Ellis, Fields, Olive (2002)

Feng, Rajaraman, Takayama (2003)

Page 21: Dark Matter Detection in Space Jonathan Feng UC Irvine SpacePart 03, Washington, DC 10 December 2003

10 December 2003 SpacePart 03 Feng 21

• Late decays may also distort the CMB spectrum

• For 105 s < < 107 s, get

“ distortions”:

=0: Planckian spectrum

0: Bose-Einstein spectrum

• Current bound: || < 9 x 10-5

Future (DIMES): || ~ 2 x 10-6

G Signals: CMB

Page 22: Dark Matter Detection in Space Jonathan Feng UC Irvine SpacePart 03, Washington, DC 10 December 2003

10 December 2003 SpacePart 03 Feng 22

G Signals: Diffuse Photon Flux• For small m, decays may

be very late

• Photons produced at later times have smaller initial

E ~ m

but also redshift less; in the end, they are harder

• SuperWIMPs may produce excesses in keV-MeV photon spectrum (INTEGRAL) Feng, Rajaraman, Takayama (2003)

mSWIMP = 1 TeV

m = 1 GeV

m = 10 GeV

HEAO OSSE

COMPTEL

Page 23: Dark Matter Detection in Space Jonathan Feng UC Irvine SpacePart 03, Washington, DC 10 December 2003

10 December 2003 SpacePart 03 Feng 23

Summary and Outlook

• New dark matter possibilities (all satisfying the selection rule):– Bino-Higgsino dark matter– Kaluza-Klein dark matter– superWIMP dark matter

• New theoretical possibilities new signals for dark matter in space

Page 24: Dark Matter Detection in Space Jonathan Feng UC Irvine SpacePart 03, Washington, DC 10 December 2003

10 December 2003 SpacePart 03 Feng 24

Collider Inputs

Weak-scale Parameters

Annihilation N Interaction

Relic Density Indirect Detection Direct Detection

Astrophysical and Cosmological Inputs

What’s in our Future?