direct electrochemistry of cyt c and hydrogen peroxide...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Direct electrochemistry of cyt c and hydrogen peroxide biosensing on
oleylamine- and citrate-stabilized gold nanostructures.
Ekaterina Koposovaa,b, Galina Shumilovab, Yury Ermolenkob, Alexandre Kisnerb,c, Andreas
Offenhäussera, and Yulia Mourzinaa
a Peter Grünberg Institute 8, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52425 Jülich, and Jülich-
Aachen Research Alliance - Future Information Technology (JARA-FIT)
b Faculty of Chemistry, St. Petersburg State University, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia
c current affiliation: Cell Biology and Neuroscience Department, Rutgers University, 604
Allison Road – Piscataway, NJ
Corresponding Author:
Dr. Yulia Mourzina
Peter Grünberg Institute 8, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52425, Jülich and Jülich-
Aachen Research Alliance (JARA_FIT). Tel: +49 2461 612364; Fax: +49 2461 618733; E-
mail: [email protected]
Abstract. Two types of gold nanostructures are discussed: charge(citrate)-stabilized and
sterically(OA)-stabilized gold nanostructures and their assembly with heme-containing
metalloproteins, cyt c and horseradish peroxidase (HRP) enzyme into a bioelectrochemically
active nanoarchitecture as well as a sensor application. The assembly of the nanostructures on
the thin-film gold electrodes and the immobilization and electrochemical properties of
metalloproteins on these electrodes are presented. The nanostructured bioelectrochemical
interfaces provide a good environment for the stable and reproducible immobilization of
electroactive proteins. We show that both molecules preserve their functionalities
(electrochemical and biocatalytic activities). The amount of electroactive proteins
immobilized on the nanostructured electrode surfaces is significantly increased compared to
the flat electrode surfaces. The kinetic parameters of the heterogeneous direct electron transfer
reaction of cyt c on the nanostructured electrodes are compared. The thin-film gold electrodes
modified with OANWs, OANPs, and citrate-stabilized NPs and covalently immobilized HRP
exhibit an excellent catalytic activity towards the reduction of hydrogen peroxide with a
working concentration range from 20 µM to 500 µM, a sensitivity of 0.031 A M-1 cm-2 (RSD
2
0.005), 0.027 A M-1 cm-2 (RSD 0.004), and 0.022 A M-1 cm-2 (RSD 0.0035), and a detection
limit of 5 µM, 8 µM, and 14 µM, respectively (RSDs near the detection limits were 9 to 12
%). The HRP sensor characteristics are improved significantly compared to the flat thin-film
sensors by using gold nanostructures. Our study shows that ultrathin gold nanowires and
nanoparticles with two different types of stabilizing agents are promising materials for
assembling biomolecules into functional nanoarchitectures for metalloprotein-based
bioelectrochemical sensors.
Keywords: biosensor, gold nanowire, gold nanoparticle, metalloprotein, cytochrome c,
horseradish peroxidase
1. Introduction
Modern developments of (bio)chemical sensors explore nanostructured materials to
improve sensor characteristics. The nanostructures can improve the interface between the
biomolecules and an electronic transducer reducing the distance between the redox center of
proteins and an electrode for a direct electron transfer [1]. Three-dimensional nanostructured
materials provide a favorable surface for the immobilization of biomolecules allowing them to
retain their biological activity due to the enhanced orientation freedom, thus preventing
denaturation of biomolecules and encouraging longer stability and higher reproducibility of
the metalloprotein functions on the nanostructured electrodes [2]. Furthermore, geometrical
signal enhancement due to an increase of the effective electrode surface area by three-
dimensional nanostructures can be achieved using nanomaterials [3].
Due to their optical, electrical and chemical properties, noble metal nanostructures are
promising materials for applications in nanoelectronics, medicine, and catalysis. Various
methods are used to prepare stable gold nanostructures based on the principle of dispersion
and condensation, where in the latter method the metal nanoparticles are produced by
reducing the metals ions of the corresponding metal salts. In most cases, gold nanoparticles
are produced by reducing gold (I) or (III) with various organic and inorganic reducing
substances, which can additionally play the role of a stabilizing agent, or/and by
photoreduction [4,5]. In the pioneering studies of M. Faraday [6] and R. Zsigmondy [7],
formaldehyde, ethanol, and white phosphorus were used as reductants for preparing
nanoparticles with a diameter of 5 to 12 nm. Widely used methods are based on such reducing
and stabilizing agents as sodium citrate (producing gold colloids in water of around 10 to 20
nm in diameter) [8], ascorbic acid (12 nm) [9], EDTA (20 nm) [10], sodium borohydride
3
[4,11], oleic acid, and oleylamine [12-14], and “green syntheses” with non-toxic agents such
as fruit extracts, allowing nanostructures of various sizes and geometries to be prepared [15],
and glucose and starch as reducing and stabilizing agents, respectively [16]. Sodium or
potassium thiocyanate was used [17] to prepare ultra-dispersion nanoparticles (2-3 nm).
Anisotropic growth conditions should be created in order to prepare non-spherical
nanostructures with high aspect ratios [18]. Nanowires of approx. 2 nm diameter and up to
several µm in length have been prepared using OA as a stabilizing and triisopropylsilane as a
reducing agent [19] and only OA as both the stabilizing and reducing agent [12-14]. The
dimensions of the nanowires depend strongly on the molar ratio of the precursor salt,
stabilizing and reducing agents as well as on solvent polarity, pH, temperature, and presence
of substances promoting the anisotropic growth of nanowires [20-22]. Factors and
mechanisms promoting anisotropic growth and the formation of nanowires and other high
aspect ratio nanostructures have been reviewed [4,13,21,23-25]. Understanding the properties
and advantages of metal nanostructures in comparison to bulk metal encourages their
application in biosensors.
Investigations have focused on assembling nanoelectronic elements and biomolecules
with evolutionarily optimized functions, such as recognition, binding, carrier, and catalysis,
into bioelectronic systems [1,26-35] for sensors, bioelectrocatalysis, biofuel cells, and solar
energy conversion. Heterogeneous electron transfer reactions of redox proteins functioning,
for example, as electron transfer mediators of redox reaction chains and oxidoreductase
enzymes catalysts can be used for the development of bioelectrochemical sensors and
bioelectrocatalytical systems.
Metalloproteins, in particular, heme proteins, such as cytochrome c (cyt c), and
oxidoreductase enzyme horseradish peroxidase (HRP, EC 1.11.1.7.), are often used to study
the properties of bioelectronic interfaces because they provide stable and reliable systems and
are interesting for fundamental and applied studies. Cyt c is one of the most extensively
studied metalloproteins because of its central role in electron transfer in living organisms, and,
as a consequence, in the electron shuttle between molecular partners in artificial bioelectronic
systems and biofuel cells [36,37]. The conjugation of cyt c with nanoelectronic elements
[16,38,39] may provide bioelectronic systems with favorable properties with respect to the
electron transfer rate of cyt c ferri/ferro states and the amount of immobilized electroactive
metalloprotein. Horseradish peroxidase (HRP) is one of the most widely used enzymes in
analytical biochemistry for the construction of biosensors and for immunoassays. HRP-based
sensors are also used in a bi-enzymatic approach for the detection of hydrogen peroxide
4
produced in the reaction of a wide spectrum of oxidoreductase enzymes with their substrates
and for the bioelectrochemical monitoring of phenols, aminophenols, and other donor
substrates [40]. Optical and electrochemical methods are the most used methods for
determination of hydrogen peroxide. Electrochemical methods with sensors are attractive for
practical applications, because they are associated with small-size, low energy consumption,
low cost, and portability, when compared to many other analytical techniques.
The materials and surface of the electrode are of primary importance for an effective
bioelectrochemical interface. Various aspects are taken into account, such as the geometry
and morphology of the nanomaterials, immobilization of biomolecules on the electrode
surfaces, and electron transfer at the interfaces. Noble metals and carbon electrode materials
have been used most successfully [41]. On some of the electrode materials, particularly on
carbon electrodes, heterogeneous direct electron transfer has been reported between an
electrode and an electrocatalytic center of redox proteins [42-46]. Nevertheless, redox centers
of biomolecules generally lack electron transfer communication with electrode transducers
because of the insulating protein matrix. The rate of electron transfer between the electrode
and a redox center of proteins is negligibly small and drops by a factor of e for each 0.91 Å
[47-49]. Therefore, artificial redox groups or mediators have been used to mediate electron
transfer between redox centers of biomolecules and electrodes. Approaches to incorporating
these artificial mediators include covalent attachment of electron relays to biomolecules,
conductive polymers, and redox hydrogels, and soluble artificial redox mediators [50].
Electron transfer pathways in biosensors have been reviewed [32,50].
A great variety of nanomaterials and their geometries and modifications, numerous
analyzed substances as well as sensor types complicate the analysis of data on
bioelectrochemical nanosensor materials. Therefore, authors usually focus on one type of
nanomaterial or one type of geometry of the nanostructures employed in one particular sensor
type.
In this study, we compare two types of gold nanostructures: charge(citrate)-stabilized
and sterically(OA)-stabilized gold nanostructures as an electrode platform for heme-
containing metalloproteins, cyt c and HRP enzyme. Although, the synthesis of gold
nanostructures employing OA is versatile and inexpensive, the application of the
nanostructures prepared by this method has not been exploited for bioelectronic systems. One
of the reasons for this is that the surface of the nanostructures is insulated by stabilization
compounds, which preserve the integrity of nanostructures, but simultaneously form an
insulating barrier for the charge transfer reactions. It is thus challenging to obtain access to the
5
free or chemically functionalized surfaces for bioelectrochemical systems. We outline the
synthesis and assembly of gold nanostructures on the thin-film gold electrodes.
Immobilization and electrochemical properties of heme proteins cyt c and oxidoreductase
enzyme HRP on the electrodes modified with gold nanostructures are discussed. We show
that both molecules preserve their functionalities (electrochemical and biocatalytic activities).
The amount of electroactive proteins immobilized on the nanostructured electrode surfaces is
significantly increased compared to flat electrode surfaces. Kinetic parameters were obtained
for the direct electron transfer reaction of cyt c on the nanostructured electrodes. The HRP
sensor characteristics are improved significantly by using AuNSs. We demonstrate that both
types of gold nanostructures are favorable electrode materials for assembling metalloproteins
into a bioelectrochemically active nanoarchitecture as well as a sensor application for
designing biosensors, bioelectronic devices, and bioelectrocatalysis.
2. Experimental section
2.1. Reagents and materials. Benzenedithiol (BDT), cysteamine (Cys, 2-
aminoethanethiol), ethanedithiol (EDT), 6-mercaptohexanoic acid (6-MHA), 2-
mercaptoethanol (2-ME), glutaraldehyde solution (GA, 50 %, for electron microscopy),
triisopropylsilane, oleylamine, AuCl, HAuCl4.3H2O, cytochrome c (from horse heart, type
VI), and horseradish peroxidase (HRP, peroxidase from horseradish type VI-A) were
purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and used as received. Other chemicals were reagent grade.
Distilled water was used for the experiments.
2.2. Synthesis and structural characterization of gold nanostructures.
Citrate-stabilized gold nanoparticles (cit-NP) were prepared using the Turkevich
method [8] while stirring vigorously to produce monodisperse nanoparticles with a diameter
of 17 nm, where the citrate ions act both as reducing and capping agents. Oleylamine-
stabilized gold nanoparticles (OANP) were prepared according to [14]. Briefly, 0.05 g AuCl
was dissolved in a mixed solution composed of 2 mL of OA and 2 mL of hexane. The
solution was added to a glass vessel containing 18 mL of OA at 80 °C and the mixture was
left undisturbed for 5 to 6 h. The OANPs were precipitated by centrifugation, washed three
times with ethanol and finally redispersed in hexane. Oleylamine-stabilized gold nanowires
(OANW) were prepared using a modified procedure [19]: 7.45 mg HAuCl4.3H2O was mixed
with 200µL OA, 2.5 ml hexane was added, followed by 100 µL of TIPS. After a reaction time
of about 6 h, the mixture was heated at 70 °C to 80 °C for about 30 sec. The samples were
centrifuged and re-dispersed in hexane three times. Three kinds of nanostructures were further
6
used to modify the electrode surfaces as described in sections 2.3.2 (citrate-stabilized NP) and
2.3.3 (OANP and OANW).
The electrode surfaces were structurally characterized by scanning electron
microscopy (SEM) (Gemini 1550 VP, Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) and transmission electron
microscopy (TEM) (FEI CM20 microscope operated at 200 kV, by drop casting particle
dispersions on copper grids coated with Formvar film).
2.3. Electrode preparation.
2.3.1. Flat thin-film gold electrodes. For the preparation of thin-film gold working
electrodes (WE), a silicon oxide layer 1 µm in thickness was grown on a silicon substrate.
Thin films of titanium as the adhesion layer (10 nm) and gold (300 nm) were prepared on
Si/SiO2 substrates by sputter deposition. The electrodes were cleaned in acetone, propanol,
water, and H2O2:H2SO4 1:2 v/v and rinsed thoroughly with water. After chemical cleaning,
the substrates were subjected to electrochemical cleaning by consecutive potential cycles in
0.1 M H2SO4 between 0 V and 1.5 V at 0.05 V s-1 starting and ending at 0 V against a
Ag/AgCl/KCl 3 M reference electrode. These electrodes are referred to as thin-film flat
electrodes (without the immobilized nanostructures). Subsequently, the thin-film electrodes
were used to prepare the electrodes with nanostructured surfaces.
2.3.2. Chemisorption of thiols and immobilization of citrate-stabilized AuNP. The
electrodes were immersed in 1 mM solutions of a thiol (ethanediathiol, benzenedithiol, or
cysteamine) in ethanol for 1 h. Thiols were chemisorbed at gold surfaces: Aun + RSH Aun-
1Au+S-. The electrodes were rinsed with ethanol and distilled water to eliminate excess thiols.
The thiol-modified electrodes were submersed in the solution of the citrate-stabilized gold
nanoparticles overnight and washed with water.
2.3.3. Immobilization of OA-stabilized gold nanostructures (NS). The OANP or
OANW samples prepared as described in section 2.2 were dropped onto the flat thin-film
electrode surface (prepared as described in 2.3.1) and left overnight to allow the
nanostructures to adhere. Subsequently, these electrodes were washed with hexane to remove
any nanostructures that had not adhered to the electrode surface. Oxygen plasma treatment
was performed in a plasma oven (diener electronic), 200 watt, 0.7 mbar to remove a
stabilizing agent from the surface of the nanostructures.
2.4. Immobilization of a metalloprotein cyt c. Thin-film flat and NS-modified
electrodes were immersed in solutions of 6-MHA/2-ME (5mM/5mM) in hexane for 1 h. The
electrodes were rinsed with hexane and phosphate buffer to eliminte excess alkanethiols. Cyt
c was electrostatically adsorbed from 30 µM solutions in phosphate buffer (4.4 mM, pH 7.0,
7
ionic strength 10 mM) at 4 ºC for 2 h. After adsorption, the substrates were rinsed with
phosphate buffer to remove any excess cyt c from the electrode surfaces.
2.5. Enzyme immobilization. The electrodes were immersed in 5 mM solutions of
cysteamine in hexane for 1 h. The electrodes were rinsed with hexane and phosphate buffer to
eliminate excess alkanethiols. The electrodes were further immersed in 2.5 % v/v
glutaraldehyde solution in phosphate buffer (0.1 M, pH 7.0) for 1.5 h at room temperature.
The electrodes were rinsed with phosphate buffer and immersed in the solution of HRP (5
mg/ml) for 1 h at room temperature and left at 4 ºC overnight. After immobilization, the
substrates were rinsed with phosphate buffer to remove any excess enzyme from the electrode
surface.
2.6. Electrochemical measurements. Cyclic voltammetry measurements were
performed in a three-electrode setup controlled by a potentiostat (AUTOLAB, Eco Chemie,
The Netherlands). The electrochemical cell was composed of a gold working electrode, coiled
platinum wire counter electrode, and a Ag/AgCl reference electrode (3 M KCl, Ef = 0.210 V
against NHE). Electrochemical experiments were performed at room temperature 21±1 ºC.
Solutions were deaerated with argon and maintained under an argon stream during the
measurements. The diameter of the working electrode in the electrochemical cell was 0.5 cm.
2.7. Correction of peak potential. The anodic and cathodic peak potentials of cyt c
on nanostructured electrodes were corrected for the uncompensated ohmic potential drop due
the solution resistance according to the equation: Epcor = Ep
CV - Ip.Ru, where Ep
CV is the Ep
value defined from the voltammogram and Ru is the uncompensated resistance [51]. Peak
potentials corrected using this equation are shown in Table 1.
2.8. Surface coverage of cyt c. For a redox couple that is immobilized on the
electrode surface, the surface coverage on the electrode surface, o, is given by:
nFA
0
,
where o is the surface coverage of cyt c on the electrode surface, Α is the area under the peak
(in units V.A), n is the number of electron transfer, A is the area of the flat electrode in the
electrochemical cell (0.196 cm2), and ν is the scan rate. The surface coverage was calculated
from the baseline-corrected peaks.
3. Results and discussion
8
3.1. Characterization of the Au NSs. The gold nanostructures on electrode surfaces
were analyzed by scanning and transmission electron microscopy (Fig. 1). The oleylamine-
stabilized gold nanoparticles were 10 to 14 nm in diameter, and citrate-stabilized gold
nanoparticles were 15 to 19 nm in diameter. The nanowires were about 2 nm in diameter and
up to several micrometers in length.
Figure 1. Scanning (A,C,E,F) and transmission (B,D) electron micrographs of (A, B)
Au NPs, (C,D) Au NWs, (E) and (F) citrate-stabilized NPs attached via cysteamine and
ethanedithiol, respectively. Scale bars are 100 nm (A,C), 5 nm (D), 20 nm (E), and 200 nm
(E,F).
9
The electroactive surface area of the nanostructured electrode surfaces was determined
from the gold oxide reduction peak using electrochemical redox cycling, Figure 2 [3,52,53].
The electroactive surface area of the electrodes modified with nanostructures increased about
5.8 (S = 1.15 9% cm2), 6.2 (S = 1.22 14% cm2), and 3.5 (S = 0.712 12% cm2) times
compared to a planar thin film gold electrode surface (S = 0.196 0.014 cm2) for OANP,
OANW, and cit-NP electrodes, respectively.
Figure 2. Oxidation and reduction of electrode surfaces in 0.1 M H2SO4: planar gold thin film
(1), planar gold film modified with citrate-stabilized Au NPs covalently attached to the thin
film surface by EDT (2), planar gold thin film modified with OANPs (3) and OANWs (4),
scan rate - 30 mV.s-1. OP treatment 5 min.
3.2. Direct electrochemistry of cyt c.
10
Scheme 1. Assembly of metalloproteins on electrodes: (A) cyt c, and (B)
oxidoreductase enzyme horseradish peroxidase (structures of horse heart cyt c and horseradish
peroxidase were adapted from the Protein Data Bank [54]).
The –COOH and –NH2-terminated monolayers of thiols on gold (Sections 2.4 and 2.5)
were used for the immobilization of proteins.
Cyt c was immobilized on the electrode surfaces as described in Section 2.4, Scheme
1A [55]. During thiol chemisorption the stabilizing agent on the surface of the gold
nanostructures (molecules of oleylamine and its oligomeric reaction products or citrate ions)
were replaced by thiols with negatively charged carboxyl and alcohol groups. The
electrochemical characteristics of the heterogeneous electron transfer of cyt c and
concentrations of electroactive cyt c on the electrodes are compared in Figure 3 and Table 1.
Dependence of the redox currents of cyt c on the scan rate (Figure S1) proves that
electroactive cyt c was confined to the electrode surface.
Figure 3. CVs of cyt c on electrodes: planar thin-film Au-SAM-cyt c electrode. A:
planar thin-film Au-SAM-cyt c (a), Au-NPs-OP-SAM-cyt c (b), planar thin-film Au-NWs-
OP-SAM-cyt c (c), planar thin-film Au-SAM without cyt c (d, dotted line). B: planar thin-film
Au-SAM-cyt c (a), Cys-bound cit-Au-NPs-SAM-cyt c (b), EDT bound cit-Au-NPs-SAM-cyt
c (c); other conditions: scan rate - 50 mV s-1, 4.4 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.0.
The slight decrease in the electron transfer rates for the electrodes modified with
nanostructures is probably due to an additional tunneling barrier for the electron transfer
provided by organic stabilizing molecules remaining on the surfaces of nanostructures. This is
more pronounced for the OA-stabilized nanostructures. The amount of cyt c immobilized on
the AuNS electrodes was significantly higher than for the thin-film flat electrodes, Table 1,
with the highest amount of cyt c immobilized on the OA-stabilized nanoparticles. For the
11
citrate-stabilized nanoparticles, faster kinetics of the electron transfer and larger amount of cyt
c was observed for the nanoparticles electrostatically immobilized on the thin-film gold
electrode surface using cysteamine. Electrodes with citrate NPs covalently bound to the
electrode surface using EDT demonstrated worse characteristics, Table 1. Electrodes modified
with Au-NSs display higher capacitive currents compared to the planar gold thin-film
electrodes (Figure 3) due to a greater surface area of the electrodes with immobilized gold
nanostructures (see Section 3.1).
Table 1. Electrochemical characteristics of the heterogeneous electron transfer of cyt c
on electrodes, oNS / o
flat – ratio of concentrations of cyt c on the OANS electrode and flat
electrode.
Electrode system Ecor, mV kETL, s-1 o, pmol cm-
2
oNS/o
flat
Au-SAM-cyt c 8(1) 9(1.1) 5.3(0.3) 1
Au-NP-OP-SAM-cyt c 39(5) 2.0(0.3) 94(8) 18
Au-NW-OP-SAM-cyt c 28(6) 2.4(0.5) 31(6) 6
EDT-cit-Au-NPs_SAM-cyt c 18(2.5) 3.2(0.4) 2.6(0.2) 0.5
Cys-cit-Au-NPs_SAM-cyt c 11(2) 5(0.6) 7.4(0.5) 1.4
a Ecor – difference between peak potentials corrected for the ohmic potential drop due to the
solution resistance; kETL – heterogeneous electron transfer constant found by the Laviron
method [56]; o – concentration of cyt c on the surface [53]; 95 % confidence intervals are
given in parenthesis (n=5).
For basic and applied studies, cyt c was immobilized on various flat and
nanostructured surfaces, e.g., gold nanostructures (mostly gold nanoparticles) [57-60],
graphene nanosheets [61], and fullerene film-modified electrodes [62]. However, the data on
the thermodynamics and kinetics of interfacial redox processes of cyt c electrostatically
adsorbed on the surfaces revealed a large scattering of the data for the formal redox potential
E0’, the heterogeneous electron transfer rate constant kET, and the amount of the immobilized
electroactive cyt c. The heterogeneous electron transfer rate constant of cyt c electrostatically
adsorbed on thiol SAMs varied in the range of 0.3 s-1 – 880 s-1 [59,60]. The heterogeneous
12
electron transfer rate constant decreased with an increasing electron transfer distance
(alkanethiol chain length) [63,64]. Additionally, some discrepancy in the kET values may be
explained by the observed dependence of kET on v (scan rate) [65]. High surface coverage of
cyt c up to about 123 pmol cm2 in the layered nanospace of graphene nanosheets [61]
compared to the theoretical value of 13 pmol cm-2 for monolayer cyt c on the GCE surface
and 20 pmol cm-2 [66] on a gold surface was reported. Lower values are usually reported for
the electroactive coverage on SAM-modified flat gold surface.
3.3. Hydrogen peroxide sensing with horseradish peroxidase (HRP) enzyme.
Covalent attachment of the enzymes to the electrode surface improves the stability and
reproducibility of the enzyme-modified electrodes in comparison to the adsorption, therefore
this strategy was employed here. The HRP enzyme was immobilized on the flat thin-film and
NS electrodes, as described in Section 2.5 and Scheme 1B [67]. The electrocatalytic
properties of the sensors were evaluated based on the determination of hydrogen peroxide in
the presence of the redox mediator hydroquinone, since no stable and reproducible direct
electron transfer between the catalytic center of the enzyme and electrodes was observed in
the present work. It was shown earlier that the cationic peroxidases, such as HRP,
demonstrate a lower percentage of molecules in direct electron transfer on graphite electrodes
than the anionic peroxidases [42]. The redox mediator hydroquinone participates in the
reaction as a two electron-proton mediator and demonstrates a higher reaction rate between
the oxidized HRP and hydroquinone (k= 1.2.107 M-1 s-1 [68,69]) in comparison with other
mediators.
For the HRP-modified electrodes, the dependence of the reduction current of the
mediator (Q + 2e + 2H+ QH2) on the concentration of hydrogen peroxide is described in
Scheme 1B. The dependence of the redox currents of the sensor response on the scan rate is
shown in Figure S2.
Figure 5 shows the calibration curves for the enzyme biosensors based on flat thin-
film and nanostructure-modified electrodes. Sensors based on HRP immobilized on the
electrodes with nanostructures display significantly improved performance with respect to the
sensitivity and working concentration range (Figure 5, Table 2). A working concentration
range of 18 to 500 µM and detection limits of 5 µM (RSD 0.09) for the HRP-OANW, 8 µM
(RSD 0.09) for the HRP-OANP, and 14 µM (0.15) for the HRP-cit-NP sensors are
13
comparable with the characteristics of the hydrogen peroxide nanostructured electrodes
reported recently [44,70-76]. Higher current densities were observed for the electrodes
modified with nanostructures compared to the HRP-modified flat thin-film gold electrode.
This can be explained by the larger amount of electroactive enzyme HRP on the
nanostructured electrodes.
Figure 4. Dependence of the current on the concentration of hydrogen peroxide for
OANP electrodes. Concentrations of hydrogen peroxides: (a) 0 M, (b) 20 µM, (c) 50 µM, (d)
125 µM. Other conditions: 2.5 % GA, deaerated solutions, scan rate 50 mV s-1, phosphate
buffer 0.1 M, pH 6.8, 1.0 mM QH2.
Figure 5. Calibration curves of HRP sensors (a) HRP-Au, (b) HRP-OANP, (c) HRP-
OANW, and (d) HRP-cit-NP. Other conditions: 2.5 % GA, deaerated solutions, scan rate 50
mV s-1, phosphate buffer 0.1 M, pH 6.8, 1.0 mM QH2. Error bars represent the confidence
limits (p=0.95, n=5) at each concentration point.
Table 2. Detection limit, sensitivity, and long-term stability of the HRP biosensors.1
HRP sensor Sensitivity,
A M-1 cm-2
Detection limit,
µM 2,3
Long-term stability,
% 3
14
HRP-Au thin-film gold 0.012(0.005) 16 (0.12) 82
HRP-OANP 0.027(0.005) 8 (0.09) 91
HRP-OANW 0.031(0.004) 5 (0.09) 91
HRP-cit-NP 0.22(0.0035) 14 (0.12) 90
1 - Relative standard deviations are given in parenthesis. 2 - S/N=3, relative standard
deviations of the determinations near the detection limit were 9 to 12 %. 3 - % of the sensor
response to 50 µM H2O2 after a storage period of one month.
The dependence of the sensor response on the pH of the solution was studied in the pH
range from 4 to 8, with a maximum current response being observed in a pH interval of 6 to 7
for all sensors. The reproducibility of the sensors was evaluated by measuring sensor response
in 125 µM H2O2. The relative standard deviation of five successive measurements was 3 %.
The HRP thin-film, HRP-OANP, HRP-OANW, and HRP-cit-NP sensors retained about 82,
91, 91, and 90 % of their biocatalytic response, respectively, during storage in a phosphate
buffer at 4 °C (Table 2).
The sensors for nanomolar concentrations of hydrogen peroxide have been also
reported based on various materials and materials combinations [45,46], including conducting
charge-transfer complex TTF-TCQN [77] or Prussian blue [78,79]. We expect that studies on
the surface chemistry and assembly of OA nanostructures as well as protein immobilization
may further enhance the electrochemical and biosensing properties of cyt c and HRP
electrodes.
Hydrogen peroxide enzyme biosensors based on the electrodes modified with
nanostructures demonstrate improved performance in comparison to the flat thin-film
electrodes due to: 1) geometrical signal enhancement, i.e. greater effective surface area, and
as a consequence, a larger amount of immobilized proteins on nanostructured surfaces, and 2)
nanostructured surfaces provide a favorable microenvironment for preserving electrochemical
and biocatalytic activity of metalloproteins.
Conclusions
This paper compares nanostructure platforms based on the charge(citrate)-stabilized
and sterically(OA)-stabilized gold nanostructures for biosensing and bioelectrochemical
systems. Heme-containing metalloproteins cyt c and oxidoreductase enzyme HRP on
nanostructured interfaces were immobilized on electrodes and their electrochemical properties
were studied. The nanostructured electrodes provided a good environment for stable and
15
reproducible immobilization of electroactive metalloproteins. Enhancement of the
electrochemical signal was achieved due to a greater electroactive surface area of the
nanostructures. The heterogeneous direct electron transfer of cytochrome c on electrodes was
studied and compared for two types of gold nanostructures. Higher sensitivity,
reproducibility, and long-term stability were observed for the detection of H2O2 with HRP
sensors in the case of sensors with electrode surfaces modified with nanostructures compared
to a flat thin-film HRP sensor.
Acknowledgements. We would like to thank S. Lenk, R. Voschinsky, M. Banzet, and
E. Brauweiler-Reuters for TEM and SEM imaging, citrate-stabilized gold nanoparticles, and
preparation of the thin-film gold electrodes. Financial support of the RFBR 14-03-01079
(Russian Foundation for Basic Research) is gratefully acknowledged.
Supporting information: Dependence of Ip on the scan rate for the heterogeneous
direct electron transfer of cyt c on the electrodes (Figure S1), Dependence of the HRP-OANP
sensor response on the scan rate in the presence of 200 µM H2O2 (Figure S2).
References
[1] J. Wang, Electrochemical glucose biosensors, Chem. Rev. 108 (2008) 814–825.
[2] P. Yanez-Sedeno, J.M. Pingaron, Gold nanoparticle-based electrochemical biosensors,
Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 382 (2005) 884-886.
[3] F. Schröper, D. Brüggemann, Y. Mourzina, B. Wolfrum, A. Offenhäusser, D. Mayer,
Analyzing the electroactive surface of gold nanopillars by electrochemical methods
for electrode miniaturization, Electrochim. Acta 53 (2008) 6265-6272.
[4] M.C. Daniel, D. Astruc, Gold nanoparticles: assembly, supramolecular chemistry,
quantum-size-related properties, and applications toward biology, catalysis, and
nanotechnology, Chem. Rev. 104 (2004) 293-346.
[5] T. Teranishi, Metallic colloids, in: A. Hubbard (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Surface and
Colloid Science, Marcel Dekker, New York, 2002, p.3314.
[6] M. Faraday, The bakerian lecture: experimental relations of gold (and other metals) to
light, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London 147 (1857) 145-180.
[7] R. Zsigmondy, Ueber wässrige Lösungen metallischen Goldes, Ann. Chem. 301
(1898) 29-54.
16
[8] J. Turkevich, P.C. Stevenson, J. Hiller, A study of the nucleation and growth processes
in the synthesis of colloidal gold, Discuss, Faraday Soc. 11 (1951) 55-75.
[9] E.C. Stathis, A. Fabricanos, Preparation of colloidal gold, Chem. Ind. London 27
(1958) 860-861.
[10] A. Fabrikanos, S. Athanassiou, K.H. Lieser, Preparation of stable hydrosols of
gold and silver by reduction with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, Z. Naturforsch. B
18 (1963) 612-617.
[11] M. Brust, M. Walker, D. Bethell, D.J. Schiffrin, R.J. Whyman, Synthesis of
thiol-derivatised gold nanoparticles in a two-phase Liquid–Liquid system, J Chem.
Soc. , Chem. Comm. (1994) 801-802.
[12] C. Wang; Y. Hu, C.M. Lieber; S. Sun, Ultrathin Au Nanowires and Their
Transport Properties, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130 (2008) 8902-8903.
[13] A. Halder, N. Ravishankar, Ultrafine Single-Crystalline Gold Nanowire Arrays
by Oriented Attachment, Adv. Mater. 19 (2007) 1854-1858.
[14] A. Kisner, S. Lenk, D. Mayer, Y. Mourzina, A. Offenhäusser, Determination of
the Stability Constant of the Intermediate Complex during the Synthesis of Au
Nanoparticles Using Aurous Halide, J. Phys. Chem. C, 113 (2009) 20143-20147.
[15] Y.Tai, N.T.T. Tran, Y.-C. Tsai, IET Nanobiotechnol. 5(2) (2011) 52-59.
[16] P.S. Jensen, C. Engelbrekt, K.H. Sørensen, J. Zhang, Q. Chi, J. Ulstrup, Au-
Biocompatible metallic nanostructures in metalloprotein electrochemistry and
electrocatalysis, J. Mater. Chem. 22 (2012) 13877-13882.
[17] W. Baschong, J. Lucocq, J. Roth, “Thiocyanate gold”: small (2–3 nm) colloidal
gold for affinity cytochemical labeling in electron microscopy, Histochemistry 83
(1985) 409-411.
[18] K. Vasilev, T. Zhu, M. Wilms, Simple, One-Step Synthesis of Gold Nanowires
in Aqueous Solution, Langmuir 21 (2005) 12399-12403.
[19] H. Feng, Y. Yang, Y. You, G. Li, J. Guo, T. Yu, Z. Shen, T. Wu, B. Xing,
Simple and rapid synthesis of ultrathin gold nanowires, their self-assembly and
application in surface-enhanced Raman scattering, Chem. Comm. (2009) 1984-1986.
[20] X. Lu, M.S. Yavuz, H.Y. Tuan, B.A. Korgel, Y. Xia, Ultrathin Gold
Nanowires Can Be Obtained by Reducing Polymeric Strands of Oleylamine−AuCl
Complexes Formed via Aurophilic Interaction, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130 (2008) 8900-
8901.
17
[21] J. Gao, C.M. Bender, C.J. Murphy, Dependence of the Gold Nanorod Aspect
Ratio on the Nature of the Directing Surfactant in Aqueous Solution, Langmuir 19
(2003) 9065-9070.
[22] F. Kim, K. Sohn, J. Wu, Chemical Synthesis of Gold Nanowires in Acidic
Solutions, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130 (2008) 14442-14443.
[23] H. Kura, T. Ogawa, Synthesis and growth mechanism of long ultrafine gold
nanowires with uniform diameter, J. Appl. Physics 107 (2010) 074310.
[24] J. Zhang, F. Huang, Z. Lin, Progress of nanocrystalline growth kinetics based
on oriented attachment, Nanoscale 2 (2010) 18-34.
[25] D. Li, M.H. Nielsen, J.R.I. Lee, C. Frandsen, J.F. Banfield, J. J. De Yoreo,
Direction-Specific Interactions Control Crystal Growth by Oriented Attachment,
Science 336 (2012) 1014-1018.
[26] P. Bertoncello, R.J. Forster, Nanostructured materials for
electrochemiluminescence (ECL)-based detection methods: Recent advances and
future perspectives, Biosens. Bioelectron. 24 (2009) 3191-3200.
[27] A. Kisner, R. Stockman, M. Jansen, U. Yegin, A. Offenhäusser, L.T. Kubota,
Y. Mourzina, Sensing small neurotransmitter–enzyme interaction with nanoporous
gated ion-sensitive field effect transistors, Biosens. Bioelectron. 31 (2012) 157-163.
[28] C.S. Kumar (Eds.), Nanomaterials for Biosensors, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH
& Co. KGaA, Weinheim, 2007.
[29] S. Linic, P. Christopher, D.B. Ingram, Nature Materials, Plasmonic-metal
nanostructures for efficient conversion of solar to chemical energy, Nat. Mater. 10
(2011), 911-921.
[30] A. Merkoçi, Electrochemical biosensing with nanoparticles, FEBS J. 274
(2007) 310-316.
[31] S. Mubeen, J. Lee, N. Singh, S. Krämer, G.D. Stucky, M. Moskovits, An
autonomous photosynthetic device in which all charge carriers derive from surface
plasmons, Nat. Nanotechnol. 8 (2013) 247-251.
[32] A.K. Sarma, P. Vatsyayan, P. Goswami, S.D. Minteer, Recent advances in
material science for developing enzyme electrodes, Biosens. Bioelectron. 24 (2009)
2313-2322.
[33] J. Wang, Nanomaterial-based electrochemical biosensors, Analyst 130 (2005)
421-426.
18
[34] I. Willner, E. Katz (Eds.), Bioelectronics: From Theory to Applications, Wiley-
VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, 2005.
[35] K. Dawson, M. Baudequin, A. O’Riordan, Single on-chip gold nanowires for
electrochemical biosensing of glucose, Analyst, 136 (2011) 4507-4513.
[36] P.N. Bartlett, Bioelectrochemistry. Fundamentals, Experimental Techniques
and Applications, John Wiley & Sons, Wiltshire, 2008.
[37] I. Willner, Biomaterials for Sensors, Fuel Cells, and Circuitry, Science 298
(2002) 2407-2408.
[38] B.Y. Hua, J. Wang, K. Wang, X. Li, X.J. Zhu, X.H. Xia, Greatly improved
catalytic activity and direct electron transfer rate of cytochrome C due to the
confinement effect in a layered self-assembly structure, Chem. Commun. 48 (2012)
2316-2318.
[39] K.K. Reddy, K.V. Gobi, Activated direct electron transfer of nanoAu
bioconjugates of cytochrome c for electrocatalytic detection of trace levels of
superoxide dismutase enzyme, Electrochim. Acta 78 (2012) 109-114.
[40] A. Lindgren, T. Ruzgas, L. Gorton, E. Csöregi, G. Bautista-Ardila, I.Y.
Sakharov, I.G. Gazaryan, Biosensors based on novel peroxidases with improved
properties in direct and mediated electron transfer, Biosens. Bioelectron. 15 (2000)
491-497.
[41] U. Wollenberger, R. Spricigo, S. Leimkühler, K. Schröder, Protein Electrodes
with Direct Electrochemical Communication, Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. 109
(2008) 19-64.
[42] Y. Zhang, P. He, N. Hu, Horseradish peroxidase immobilized in TiO2
nanoparticle films on pyrolytic graphite electrodes: direct electrochemistry and
bioelectrocatalysis, Electrochim. Acta 49 (2004) 1981-1988.
[43] S.Q. Liu, H.X. Ju, Renewable reagentless hydrogen peroxide sensor based on
direct electron transfer of horseradish peroxidase immobilized on colloidal gold-
modified electrode, Anal. Biochem. 307 (2002) 110-116.
[44] S. Mao, Y. Long, W. Li, Y. Tu, A. Deng, Core–shell structured Ag@C for
direct electrochemistry and hydrogen peroxide biosensor applications, Biosens.
Bioelectron. 48 (2013) 258-262.
[45] T. Wang, L. Wang, J. Tu, H, Xiong, S. Wang, Core–shell structured Ag@C for
direct electrochemistry and hydrogen peroxide biosensor applications,
Bioelectrochemistry 94 (2013) 94-99.
19
[46] D.H. Fan, J.Y. Sun, K.J. Huang, Direct electrochemistry of horseradish
peroxidase on Nafion/[bmim]PF6/agarose composite film modified glassy carbon
electrode, Colloids Surf., B 76 (2010) 44-49.
[47] H.B. Gray, B.G. Malström, Long-range electron transfer in multisite
metalloproteins, Biochemistry 28 (1989) 7499-7505.
[48] A. Heller, Electrical connection of enzyme redox centers to electrodes, J. Phys.
Chem. 96 (1992) 3579-3587.
[49] R.A. Marcus, N. Suttin, Electron transfers in chemistry and biology, Biochim.
Biophys. Acta 811 (1985) 265-322.
[50] W. Schuhmann, Amperometric enzyme biosensors based on optimised
electron-transfer pathways and non-manual immobilisation procedures, Rev. Mol.
Biotechnol. 82 (2002) 425-441.
[51] J. Newman, Resistance for flow of current to a disk, J. Electrochem. Soc. 113
(1966) 501-502.
[52] J.C. Hoogvliet, M. Dijksma, B. Kamp, W.P. van Bennekom, Electrochemical
Pretreatment of Polycrystalline Gold Electrodes To Produce a Reproducible Surface
Roughness for Self-Assembly: A Study in Phosphate Buffer pH 7.4, Anal. Chem. 72
(2000) 2016-2021.
[53] E. Koposova, A. Kisner, G. Shumilova, Y. Ermolenko, A. Offenhäusser, Y.
Mourzina, Oleylamine-Stabilized Gold Nanostructures for Bioelectronic Assembly.
Direct Electrochemistry of Cytochrome c, J. Phys. Chem. C 117 (2013) 13944-13951.
[54] http://www.rcsb.org/pdb.
[55] M.C. Leopold, E.F. Bowden, Influence of gold substrate topography on the
voltammetry of cytochrome c adsorbed on carboxylic acid terminated self-assembled
monolyers, Langmuir 18 (2002) 2239-2245.
[56] E. Laviron, General Expression of the Linear Potential Sweep Voltammogram
in the Case of Diffusionless Electrochemical Systems, J. Electroanal. Chem. 101
(1979) 19-28.
[57] K. Caban, A. Offenhaeusser, D. Mayer, Electrochemical characterization of the
effect of gold nanoparticles on the electron transfer of cytochrome c, Phys. Stat. Solidi
A 206 (2009) 489-500.
[58] P.S. Jensen, C. Engelbrekt, K.H. Sørensen, J. Zhang, Q. Chi, J. Ulstrup, Au-
Biocompatible metallic nanostructures in metalloprotein electrochemistry and
electrocatalysis, J. Mater. Chem. 22 (2012) 13877-13882.
20
[59] K.K. Reddy, K.V. Gobi, Activated direct electron transfer of nanoAu
bioconjugates of cytochrome c for electrocatalytic detection of trace levels of
superoxide dismutase enzyme, Electrochim. Acta 78 (2012) 109-114.
[60] G. Zhao, Y. Lei, Y. Zhang, H. Li, M. Liu, Growth and Favorable
Bioelectrocatalysis of Multishaped Nanocrystal Au in Vertically Aligned TiO2
Nanotubes for Hemoprotein, J. Phys. Chem. C 112 (2008) 14786-14795.
[61] B. Y. Hua, J. Wang, K. Wang, X. Li, X. J. Zhu, X. H. Xia, Greatly improved
catalytic activity and direct electron transfer rate of cytochrome C due to the
confinement effect in a layered self-assembly structure, Chem. Comm. 48 (2012)
2316-2318.
[62] F. D’Souza, L.M. Rogers, E.S. O’Dell, A. Kochman, W. Kutner,
Immobilization and electrochemical redox behavior of cytochrome c on fullerene film-
modified electrodes, Bioelectrochemistry 66 (2005) 35-40.
[63] A. Avila, B.W. Gregory, K. Niki, T. M. Cotton, An Electrochemical Approach
to Investigate Gated Electron Transfer Using a Physiological Model System:
Cytochrome c Immobilized on Carboxylic Acid-Terminated Alkanethiol Self-
Assembled Monolayers on Gold Electrodes, J. Phys. Chem. B 104 (2000) 2759-2766.
[64] P. Hildebrandt, D.H. Murgida, Electron transfer dynamics of cytochrome c
bound to self-assembled monolayers on silver electrodes, Bioelectrochemistry 55
(2002) 139-143.
[65] J.L. Willit, E.F. Bowden, Determination of unimolecular electron-transfer rate
constants for strongly adsorbed cytochrome c on tin oxide electrodes, J. Electroanal.
Chem. 221 (1987) 265-274.
[66] J. M. Willit, E.F. Bowden, Adsorption and redox thermodynamics of strongly
adsorbed cytochrome c on tin oxide electrodes, J. Phys. Chem. 94 (1990) 8241-8246.
[67] M. Lynn, Inorganic support intermediates: covalent coupling of enzymes on
inorganic supports, in: H.H. Weetal (Eds.), Immobilized enzymes, antigens,
antibodies, and peptides, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1975, pp. 1-49.
[68] T. Ruzgas, E. Csöregi, J. Emneus, L. Gorton, G. Marko-Varga, Peroxidase-
modified electrodes: Fundamentals and application, Anal. Chim. Acta 330 (1996)
123-128.
[69] T. Ruzgas, L. Gorton, J. Emneus, G. Marko-Varga, Kinetic models of
horseradish peroxidase action on a graphite electrode, J. Electroanal. Chem. 391
(1995), 41-49.
21
[70] A.K.M. Kafi, G. Wu, A. Chen, A novel hydrogen peroxide biosensor based on
the immobilization of horseradish peroxidase onto Au-modified titanium dioxide
nanotube arrays, Biosens. Bioelectron. 24 (2008) 566-571.
[71] X. Zhao, Z. Mai, X. Kang, X. Zou, Direct electrochemistry and electrocatalysis
of horseradish peroxidase based on clay–chitosan-gold nanoparticle nanocomposite,
Biosens. Bioelectron. 23 (2008) 1032-1038.
[72] H. Yin, S. Ai, W. Shi, L. Zhu, A novel hydrogen peroxide biosensor based on
horseradish peroxidase immobilized on gold nanoparticles-silk fibroin modified glassy
carbon electrode and direct electrochemistry of horseradish peroxidase, Sens.
Actuators, B 137 (2009) 747-753.
[73] C. Xiang, Y. Zou, L. Sun, F. Xu, Direct electrochemistry and enhanced
electrocatalysis of horseradish peroxidase based on flowerlike ZnO-gold
nanoparticles-Nafion nanocomposite, Sens. Actuators B 136 (2009) 158-162.
[74] L. Wang, E. Wang, A novel hydrogen peroxide sensors based on horseradish
peroxidase immobilized on colloidal gold modified ITO electrode, Electrochem.
Commun. 6 (2004) 225-229.
[75] C. Lei, S. Hua, G. Shen, R. Yu, Immobilization of horseradish peroxidase to a
nano-Au monolayer modified chitosan-entrapped carbon paste electrode for the
detection of hydrogen peroxide, Talanta 59 (2003) 981-988.
[76] J.F. Botero-Cadavid, A.G. Brolo, P. Wild, N. Djilali, Detection of hydrogen
peroxide using an optical fiber-based sensing probe, Sens. Actuators, B, 185 (2013)
166-173.
[77] Z. Cao, X. Jiang, Q. Xie, S. Yao, A third-generation hydrogen peroxide
biosensor based on horseradish peroxidase immobilized in a tetrathiafulvalene–
tetracyanoquinodimethane/multiwalled carbon nanotubes film, Biosens. Bioelectron.
24 (2008) 222-227.
[78] A.A. Karyakin, E.E. Karyakina, L. Gorton, Amperometric Biosensor for
Glutamate Using Prussian Blue-Based “Artificial Peroxidase” as a Transducer for
Hydrogen Peroxide, Anal. Chem. 72 (2000) 1720-1723.
[79] F. Ricci, G. Palleschi, Sensor and biosensor preparation, optimisation and
applications of Prussian Blue modified electrodes, Biosens. Bioelectron. 21 (2005)
389-407.