“digital transparency in government: what we have and what we need” beth cate associate...

4
“Digital Transparency in Government: What We Have and What We Need” Beth Cate Associate Professor School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University SUNSHINE WEEK SYMPOSIUM

Upload: alvin-thompson

Post on 29-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: “Digital Transparency in Government: What We Have and What We Need” Beth Cate Associate Professor School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University

“Digital Transparency in Government: What We Have and

What We Need”

Beth CateAssociate Professor

School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University

SUNSHINE WEEK SYMPOSIUM

Page 2: “Digital Transparency in Government: What We Have and What We Need” Beth Cate Associate Professor School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University

WHAT WE HAVE

• FOIA.gov• FOIAonline• Open Government Initiative/Open Government

Partnership– FOIA Modernization Advisory Committee– Presidential/NARA Directives on electronic mgmt of records,

including email by 2016• Data.gov• State and city portals leading the way• Civic hacking and growth in publicly developed APIs, data

standards

Page 3: “Digital Transparency in Government: What We Have and What We Need” Beth Cate Associate Professor School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University

WHAT WE NEED

• Embedded ethos of openness• Appreciation of the difference between open

data for efficiency or stimulus, and openness for accountability

• Common FOIA portal and core regulation• Tools for effective data use– Access (including net neutrality), data literacy

Page 4: “Digital Transparency in Government: What We Have and What We Need” Beth Cate Associate Professor School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University

Service enhancement v. Accountability

“Predictably, agencies responding to [the OGI] mandate have tended to release data that helps them serve their existing goals without throwing open the doors for uncomfortable increases in public scrutiny.”

– Yu and Robinson, “The New Ambiguity of ‘Open Government,’” 59 UCLA L. Rev. Disc. 178, 198 (2012)