digital health technologies to address the social determinants of … · 2019-06-20 · identified...
TRANSCRIPT
Digital Health Technologies to Address the
Social Determinants of Health in context of
Substance Use Disorders (SUD)
Webinar #2: Environment and Investigators
Victor Prikhodko, Business Advisor [C]
Office of Translational Initiatives and Program
Innovations (OTIPI), Office of Director (OD)
NIDA
2
3
RFA-DA-20-017 and RFA-DA-20-018
Commercializable, digital health-based products that aim at
positively affecting the fundamental social and environmental
conditions that are risk factors for the populations affected by the
use of drugs, including opioids
Digital Health Technologies to Address the Social
Determinants of Health in context of Substance Use
Disorders (SUD)
Informational Webinars to break
down the application process4
Environment and Investigators
Tuesday June 20, 2019
Significance and InnovationTuesday June 25, 2019 2-4PM EDT
Specific Aims and Approach
Thursday June 27, 2019, 12-2PM EDT
Commercialization PlanTuesday July 2, 2019, 2-4PM EDT
https://sbir.nih.gov/nida/RFA%3ASocial_Determinants
Due Date
July 29th, 2019 5pm
Introduction to SDoH RFATuesday June 18, 2019
5
https://sbir.nih.gov/infographic
Complete Five Required
Registrations as soon as possible.
6What goes into the application?
Application Breakdown
Applicant’s Information
BioSketches
Budget
Commercialization Plan
Direct to Phase II
Fast Track
Specific Aims
Research Strategy
6pg for Phase I
12pg for Phase II/Fast Track
Letters of Support
7
https://www.niaid.nih.gov/grants-contracts/sample-applications#r43r44
8
https://www.niaid.nih.gov/grants-contracts/sample-applications#r43r44
9
https://grants.nih.gov/grants/ElectronicReceipt/files/Annotated_Forms_SmallBus_FORMS-E.pdf
10
https://grants.nih.gov/grants/how-to-apply-application-guide/forms-e/sbir-sttr-forms-e.pdf
Application Evaluation
• Significance
• Innovation
• Approach
• Investigators
• Environment
11
https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/rfa-da-20-018.html
Summary Statement12
https://www.niaid.nih.gov/grants-contracts/sample-applications#r43r44
13
https://www.niaid.nih.gov/grants-contracts/sample-applications#r43r44
Criteria: Environment
Will the scientific environment in which the work will be done
contribute to the probability of success?
Are the institutional support, equipment and other physical
resources available to the investigators adequate for the
project proposed?
Will the project benefit from unique features of the scientific
environment, subject populations, or collaborative
arrangement
14
https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/rfa-da-20-018.html
Criteria: Environment
(Clinical Trials)
If proposed, are the administrative, data coordinating,
enrollment and laboratory/testing centers, appropriate for the
trial proposed?
Does the application adequately address the capability and
ability to conduct the trial at the proposed site(s) or centers?
Are the plans to add or drop enrollment centers, as needed,
appropriate?
If international site(s) is/are proposed, does the application
adequately address the complexity of executing the clinical
trial?
If multi-sites/centers, is there evidence of the ability of the
individual site or center to: (1) enroll the proposed numbers; (2)
adhere to the protocol; (3) collect and transmit data in an
accurate and timely fashion; and, (4) operate within the
proposed organizational structure?
15
https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/rfa-da-20-018.html
16
https://www.niaid.nih.gov/grants-contracts/sample-applications#r43r44
Example of Environment Section
17
https://www.niaid.nih.gov/grants-contracts/sample-applications#r43r44
Example of Environment Section
Environment: Best Practices
and Recommendations
Identify all resources necessary to
complete the proposed project
Is it clear to Reviewers were the work will be
done and that the resources are available
Outline access to all available resources,
not just technical
E.g. Access to additional resources that are
key to commercialization (E.g. Tech Transfer,
Investors, Regulatory Network)
Use the Review Criteria as a Check List
18
19
https://sbir.nih.gov/nida/statebusinessresources
Criteria: Investigators
Are the PD(s)/PI(s), collaborators, and other researchers
well suited to the project?
If Early Stage Investigators or those in the early stages
of independent careers, do they have appropriate
experience and training?
If established, have they demonstrated an ongoing
record of accomplishments that have advanced their
field(s)?
If the project is collaborative or multi-PD/PI, do the
investigators have complementary and integrated
expertise; are their leadership approach, governance
and organizational structure appropriate for the
project?
20
https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/rfa-da-20-018.html
Definition of a Principal
Director/Project Director
PD/PI Definition: As defined in 42 CFR 52, the PD/PI(s) is or are the
“…individual(s) judged by the applicant organization to have the
appropriate level of authority and responsibility to direct the project
or program supported by the grant and who is or are responsible
for the scientific and technical direction of the project.” When the
proposed PD/PI clearly does not have sufficient qualifications to
assume this role, the application is not likely to receive a favorable
evaluation.
Primary employment means that more than one half (greater than
50%) of the PD/PI’s time is spent in the employ of the SBC. Primary
employment with an SBC precludes fulltime. employment at
another organization…
21
https://grants.nih.gov/grants/how-to-apply-application-guide/forms-e/sbir-sttr-forms-e.pdf
Use our Database22
NIDA = DA
SBIR/STTR
https://projectreporter.nih.gov/reporter.cfm
Identify Academic Partners23
NIDA = DA
https://projectreporter.nih.gov/reporter.cfm
Identify Academic Partners24
https://projectreporter.nih.gov/reporter_matchmaker.cfm?source=RPCO&new=1
Example of Using NIH RePORTER25
“addiction digital health clinical research”
Academic Researchers
Identified via NIH RePORTER
1. Aimee Campbell, Columbia2. Kathleen Carroll, Yale3. Jan Gryczynski, Friends Research Institute4. Shannon Mitchell, Friends Research
Institute5. Leonard Jason, Du Paul University6. James Ford, University of Wisconsin7. Andrew Quanbeck, University of
Wisconsin8. David Gustafson, University of Wisconsin9. Jennifer McNeely, NYU10. Shadi Nhavi, Montefiore11. Allison Ober, Katherine Watkins, RAND12. Stacey Sigmon, University of Vermont
1. Kenneth Silverman, Johns Hopkins2. Flavio Marsiglia, Arizona State University3. Anne Mauricio, Arizona State University4. Kevin Haggerty, University of Washington5. Dick Spoth, Iowa State University6. Willie Prado, Miami University
7. Leslie Leve, University of Oregon8. Lisa Saldana, Oregon Social Learning
Center9. Lillian Gelberg, UCLA10. Joel Bennett, University of Pennsylvania11. Sean Young, UCLA12. Marguerita Lightfoot, UCSF13. Todd Molfenter, University of Wisconsin
Madison
26
https://projectreporter.nih.gov/reporter_MatchmakerResults.cfm?mqf=1&tab=
27
https://www.niaid.nih.gov/sites/default/files/1r44ai112187-01a1_coleman.pdf
Biosketch Example
https://grants.nih.gov/grants/forms/biosketch.htm
28 Biosketch Should be Project Specific
29 Biosketch Should be Project Specific
Investigators: Best Practices
and Recommendations
Identify all personal necessary to
complete the proposed project
Is it clear to Reviewers what each key personal
will complete/be responsible for?
Areas of technical expertise
Areas of end-user expertise
Areas of commercial/product development expertise
Create a custom BioSketches for the
application (don’t cut and paste)
Use the Review Criteria as a Check List
30
Informational Webinars to break
down the application process31
1. Social Determinants RFA: Significance and Innovation Tuesday June 25, 2019, 2-4PM EDT https://nih.webex.com/nih/j.php?MTID=mb1be1c452ad75189427ef59355
cd7a17
2. Social Determinants RFA: Writing good Specific Aims and Approach Thursday June 27, 2019, 12-2PM EDT
https://nih.webex.com/nih/j.php?MTID=md4768c931438e34ff961947b97f
aefe3
3. Social Determinants RFA: Writing a good Commercialization Plan Tuesday July 2, 2019, 2-4PM EDT
https://nih.webex.com/nih/j.php?MTID=m9b22449a851e9c695cba34a55
81a2969
Contact us!
1. What problem you are trying to solve?
2. How is it solved today?
3. What are you trying to achieve? (no terminology, please!)
4. Who is your customer? Are they willing to pay? Are they
easy to find?
5. What is new about your approach?
6. If you succeed, what difference do you think it will make?
7. How long do you think it will take?
8. How much will it cost? To develop? To produce? To use?
32