developing ”sump 2.0” · b1. sump 2.0 guidelines . ing r istics d and d ity closing plenary...

Developing ”SUMP 2.0”

Concept for updating and further development

of the SUMP Guidelines

Siegfried Rupprecht, Susanne Böhler, Lasse Brand

2

Contents

1. Objectives

2. How to move to "SUMP 2.0"? • Improvements

• Extensions (existing, planned and potential)

• Modifications (existing, planned and potential)

3. Knowledge map

4. Proposed process and roles

5. Timeline

6. Next steps

7. Suggested activities at SUMP Conference

SUMP Platform Coordination Group • 6/3/2018 • Rupprecht Consult

3

1. Objectives (of this session)

To agree on a working mechanism/ process for the

update and further development of the SUMP Guidelines,

including:

• Timeline

• Responsibilities

• Draft list of topics for extensions and modifications


4

1. Objectives:

Why do we need an update of "SUMP"

• Wealth of practical SUMP experience waiting to be

analysed and transformed into good practice guidance.

• Supplementary guiding material originating from various

national and EU funded SUMP projects.

• New mobility developments (emerging technologies,

new policy challenges/ opportunities) that require a

rethinking and extension of the current SUMP guidelines.


5

1. Objectives (of the process)

• Consolidation of the take-up process of SUMP

• Addressing emerging needs from cities and Member

States for further development

• Coordinated development of one comprehensive

'compendium of guidelines' bearing the logo of the

Commission (as owner of the process) and of the SUMP

Platform


6

2. How to move to "SUMP 2.0"?

① Improvement

② Extension

SUMP Guidelines

② Extension

② Extension

③ M

od

ific

atio

n


7


(1) Updates and usability improvements of

the SUMP Guidelines

• Identify gaps and check validity of process steps

• Document experiences as good practices and

case studies

• Translate SUMP Guidelines and website into

additional European languages, taking into

account national terminology

• Connection with Urban Mobility Indicators

• Ensure consistency between extensions/

modifications/ SUMP 2.0 guidance

• SUMP knowledge map: introduction and overview

of available guidance


8


(2) Thematic SUMP Guidelines extensions

• Apply the SUMP guidance to new areas

o specific policy areas of urban mobility

(e.g. logistics, e-mobility), or

o new topics/ actors being involved

(e.g. emerging technologies)

• Elaborate specific steps of the SUMP cycle

(e.g. financing, action planning, implementation)

• Ensure that relevant fields are covered and

overlaps avoided


9

Existing SUMP Guidelines extensions

Platform branded:

• Measure selection (CH4LLENGE)

• Monitoring (CH4LLENGE)

• Participation (CH4LLENGE)

• Institutional cooperation (CH4LLENGE)

Not yet Platform branded:

• Action Plans (SUMPs-Up)

• Measure selection and measure packages:

3 manuals for starter, intermediate and

advanced SUMP cities (SUMPs-Up)

• Sustainable Urban Logistics Plan

(ENCLOSE)

• more to be added…


② Extension

10

Planned SUMP Guidelines extensions

• Financing, procurement, and contracting of

SUMP measures (ECCENTRIC)

• Addressing vulnerable groups and gender issues

(ECCENTRIC)

• Inclusion of suburban districts in SUMPs

(ECCENTRIC)

• SUMP guidance for multi-modal alternative fuels

deployment, especially in public transport

(ELIPTIC, Subgroup on Alternative Fuels in Cities of

the Sustainable Transport Forum)

• more to be added…


② Extension

11

Potential topics for future extensions


② Extension

Topic Project that develops the extension*

Electromobility and SEAP-SUMP

integration

Shared mobility, MaaS and ITS

Connected and Automated Driving (SUMPs-Up)*, linked to "automation

readiness" concept of CoEXist

Health, including Health Economic

Assessment Tool (HEAT)

Urban logistics / Sustainable Urban

Logistics Plan (SULP)

(Prosperity)*

National SUMP frameworks (Prosperity)*

Planning for innovative collective

transport at the regional level

(LOW-CARB)

more to be added…

*still to be discussed today and approved by DG MOVE/INEA

12


(3) SUMP Guidelines modifications • Adjust the SUMP process to meet needs of

specific target groups and areas

o small cities, regions

o TEN-T and urban nodes

o countries with weak planning tradition and strong

need for infrastructure and policy development

• Requires intensive dialogue with SUMP 2.0

process to ensure overall consistency of SUMP

concept


13

SUMP Guidelines modifications

Existing

• Polycentric regions (Poly-SUMP)

Potential future updates

• Urban nodes/ metropolitan regions/ TEN-T perspective

• Small and medium-sized cities

• Countries with weak planning tradition


③ Modification

14

Other (strategic) issues

• Minimum standards and quality assurance of SUMP

• Key role of Member States, ESIF programme offices, European

Commission

• Project contributions

o SUMPs-Up: Substantial update of the SUMP Self-Assessment (3 languages)

o PROSPERITY: Development of assessment schemes

Telco update SUMP Guidelines • 28/02/2018 • Siegfried Rupprecht

Categories Topics and related projects

Existing extensions,

Platform-branded

• Measure selection (CH4LLENGE)

• Monitoring (CH4LLENGE)

• Participation (CH4LLENGE)

• Institutional cooperation (CH4LLENGE)

Existing extensions,

not yet Platform-branded

• Action Plans (SUMPs-Up)

• Measure selection and measure packages: 3 manuals for starter,

intermediate and advanced SUMP cities (SUMPs-Up)

• Sustainable Urban Logistics Plan (ENCLOSE)

• (…)

Planned extensions

• Financing, procurement, and contracting of SUMP measures (ECCENTRIC)

• Addressing vulnerable groups and gender issues (ECCENTRIC)

• Inclusion of suburban districts in SUMPs (ECCENTRIC)

• Multi-modal alternative fuels deployment (ELIPTIC, STF Subgroup)

• (…)

Potential topics for future

extensions

• Electromobility and SEAP-SUMP integration

• Shared mobility, MaaS and ITS

• Connected and Automated Driving (SUMPs-Up)*

• Health, including Health Economic Assessment Tool

• Urban logistics / SULP (Prosperity)*

• National SUMP frameworks (Prosperity)*

• (…)

Existing modifications • Polycentric regions (Poly-SUMP)

Potential topics for future

modifications

• Urban nodes/ metropolitan regions/ TEN-T perspective

• Small and medium-sized cities

• Countries with weak planning tradition

• (…)

16

3. Preparing the SUMP knowledge map


Typ

e

Planning context Policy goal Technologies /

measures Methodology

Revis

ion

focus

• Focus on process

• Structural changes in

the planning cycle

• Horizontal integration

• Tailor to a specific

policy goal: modify

planning tasks,

indicators, measures,

good practices

• Focus on process and

measures

• Adress uncertainties in

planning, dynamisation of

planning indicators,

measures and good

practices

• Need to link with policy

goals and planning

process

• Focus on measures and

implementation

• Deepening/ updating

knowledge about

specific aspects of

planning process

• Focus on process

Exa

mp

le

Example

"Small cities"

Example

"Health"

Example

"Electromobility"

Example

"Monitoring and

evaluation"

17

4. Proposed process

• Consultation process with key stakeholders (limited, but systematic);

through SUMP Conference, survey, workshops?

• Active participation of SUMP projects to ensure successful

"SUMP 2.0" process

• Coordinated development of extensions and modifications that will

form a coherent 'compendium of guidelines'

• Check need for updates to tasks and timelines in workplans of

contracted SUMP projects to allow them to deliver

• Projects and activities outside DG MOVE’s direct area of influence

persuaded of becoming part of an EU-level "SUMP 2.0" activity


18

4. Proposed roles of partners and projects

• Overall decision taking and coordination: SUMP Coordination Group

• Editorial board: small subgroup of Coordination Group

• Organisational support: Eltis support team

• Rupprecht Consult:

o Update of SUMP Guidelines (under SUMPs-Up)

o Editorial coordination (outside of SUMPs-Up, self-funded)

• Content provision: SUMP take-up projects, CIVITAS IA projects,

others


19

5. Timeline


20

6. Next steps

Editorial Board • Tasks:

– Develops knowledge map

– Prepares decisions for Coordination Group

– Coordinates extensions and modifications, cooperates with authors

– Proposes extensions and modifications for SUMP Platform branding Eltis takes over operational aspects

• Members: small and operational subgroup of Coordination Group, incl. DG MOVE

• Meeting frequency: back-to-back to Coordination Group meetings, plus telephone conferences

Knowledge map • Input for SUMP 2.0 Guidelines, supports selection of topics for extensions and modifications

• Rupprecht Consult: Develops concept, updates

• EC projects and stakeholders: Contribute

• Editorial Board / Coordination Group: Comments

SUMP Conference • Contribution to SUMP 2.0: Taking stock and identifying emerging needs

• Systematic stakeholder input on SUMP Guidelines improvement, extensions and modifications


22


• SUMP 2.0 stakeholder process

introduced in opening session

• Launch that creates wide attention for

process during and after the conference

• Continued stakeholder input with

interactive formats throughout the

conference:

Taking stock of what works, key lessons

and good practices for SUMP

Emerging needs and missing guidance

• Summary of preliminary results in the

closing session (panel discussion?)


B1. SUMP 2.0 Guidelines

B2

. P

lan

nin

g fo

r co

nn

ecte

d a

nd

au

tom

ate

d m

ob

ility

Closing Plenary

Editorial board meeting

Follow-up survey

B5

. P

lan

nin

g fo

r u

rba

n fre

igh

t

an

d logis

tics

B3

. P

lan

nin

g a

lte

rna

tive

fu

el

infr

a-s

tructu

re

B4

. P

lan

nin

g fo

r M

aa

S a

nd

sh

are

d m

ob

ility

se

rvic

es

A4

. R

egio

na

l S

UM

Ps a

nd

TE

N-T

A

5. S

UM

Ps a

nd

SE

CA

Ps

C5. F

ina

nce

an

d p

rocu

rem

en

t D

4. P

lan

nin

g in s

ma

ll citie

s

Side event

Opening Plenary

23




B2

. P

lan

nin

g fo

r co

nn

ecte

d a

nd

au

tom

ate

d m

ob

ility

Closing Plenary


Follow-up survey

B5

. P

lan

nin

g fo

r u

rba

n fre

igh

t

an

d logis

tics

B3

. P

lan

nin

g a

lte

rna

tive

fu

el

infr

a-s

tructu

re

B4

. P

lan

nin

g fo

r M

aa

S a

nd

sh

are

d m

ob

ility

se

rvic

es

A4

. R

egio

na

l S

UM

Ps a

nd

TE

N-T

A

5. S

UM

Ps a

nd

SE

CA

Ps

C5. F

ina

nce

an

d p

rocu

rem

en

t D

4. P

lan

nin

g in s

ma

ll citie

s

Side event

Opening Plenary "SUMP 2.0" stream (B)

• Launch of process and briefing by EC

• Collection of ideas in interactive

session, input on what needs to be

updated in SUMP Guidelines

• Potential topics for group work:

Simplifying the SUMP process

Adding dynamic elements

Gaps in the planning process

Measure selection and action planning

Measure-oriented planning

Long-term learning in a political

environment

Quality assessment

Good practices and case studies

Languages and national terminology

National frameworks

much more…

24




B2

. P

lan

nin

g fo

r c

on

nec

ted

an

d

au

tom

ate

d m

ob

ility

Closing Plenary


Follow-up survey

B5

. P

lan

nin

g fo

r u

rba

n f

reig

ht

an

d logis

tics

B3

. P

lan

nin

g a

ltern

ati

ve

fu

el

infr

astr

uctu

re

B4

. P

lan

nin

g fo

r M

aa

S a

nd

sh

are

d m

ob

ilit

y s

erv

ices

A4

. R

egio

na

l S

UM

Ps a

nd

TE

N-T

A

5. S

UM

Ps a

nd

SE

CA

Ps

C5. F

ina

nce

an

d p

rocu

rem

en

t D

4. P

lan

nin

g in s

ma

ll citie

s

Side event

Opening Plenary

• Stocktaking in SUMP 2.0 stream and

other directly relevant sessions

• Collection of good practices and

guidance needs for extensions and

modifications

• Common facilitation format with guiding

questions that each presentation

responds to:

What are key lessons that SUMP 2.0

needs to include?

What guidance do you currently miss in

this area? (practitioner view)

• Interactive formats that include

stakeholder feedback also from

participants

25




B2

. P

lan

nin

g fo

r co

nn

ecte

d a

nd

au

tom

ate

d m

ob

ility

Closing Plenary

Editorial Board

meeting

Follow-up survey (EU-wide)

B5

. P

lan

nin

g fo

r u

rba

n fre

igh

t

an

d logis

tics

B3

. P

lan

nin

g a

lte

rna

tive

fu

el

infr

a-s

tructu

re

B4

. P

lan

nin

g fo

r M

aa

S a

nd

sh

are

d m

ob

ility

se

rvic

es

A4

. R

egio

na

l S

UM

Ps a

nd

TE

N-T

A

5. S

UM

Ps a

nd

SE

CA

Ps

C5. F

ina

nce

an

d p

rocu

rem

en

t D

4. P

lan

nin

g in s

ma

ll citie

s

Focus Group meeting

Opening Plenary

Focus group meeting:

• Specific criticism and feedback

• Small round of invited stakeholders,

structured format

Editorial Board meeting:

• Consolidation of conference input

• Planning of follow-up process

"SUMP 2.0" Survey

• Feedback and needs assessment

26

Thank you!

Legal Disclaimer: The sole responsibility for the content of this presentation lies with the authors. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European Union. The European Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. All images are provided by the respective partners (unless otherwise noted) and are approved for reproduction in this publication.

www.sumps-up.eu

developing ”sump 2.0” · b1. sump 2.0 guidelines . ing r istics d and d ity closing plenary...

Documents