developing and applying tools

Upload: natalia-miranda

Post on 04-Jun-2018

226 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/13/2019 Developing and Applying Tools

    1/43

    Developing and Applying Tools:

    Rubrics and Exam Questions

    n a c ens, .

    Dawn Zimmaro, Ph.D.

    John Kucsera, Ph.D.

    The University of Texas at Austin

  • 8/13/2019 Developing and Applying Tools

    2/43

    Agenda

    1. Overview of SACS

    2. Mapping Assessments to Program Outcomes

    3. Writing Critical Thinking Exam Questions4. Creating Rubrics

  • 8/13/2019 Developing and Applying Tools

    3/43

    Academic units

    Administrative units

  • 8/13/2019 Developing and Applying Tools

    4/43

    Agenda

    1. Overview of SACS

    2. Mapping Assessments to Program Outcomes

    3. Writing Critical Thinking Exam Questions4. Creating Rubrics

  • 8/13/2019 Developing and Applying Tools

    5/43

    Mapping Assessments to Program Outcomes

    At what level should you collect data to measure your

    outcomes?

    Program

  • 8/13/2019 Developing and Applying Tools

    6/43

    Issues to consider

    What existing course assignments, exams, projects, etc.

    can you use to measure your learning outcomes?

    What program level assessments can you identify or

    What is unique about your program that is measurable?

  • 8/13/2019 Developing and Applying Tools

    7/43

    Classroom level

    Exam

    Assignment

    Presentation Paper

    Project

  • 8/13/2019 Developing and Applying Tools

    8/43

    Program level

    Exit exam

    Thesis/dissertation

    Capstone course paper or project Portfolio

    Licensure/professional exam

    Exit survey

  • 8/13/2019 Developing and Applying Tools

    9/43

    English Department B.A.

    Example learning outcome:

    Students will be able to construct arguments and

    communicate them effectively in writing.

  • 8/13/2019 Developing and Applying Tools

    10/43

    Classroom level assessment

    Read description of E 370W Major Authors (Emerson)

  • 8/13/2019 Developing and Applying Tools

    11/43

    Assignment

    Writing assignment that asks students to develop an

    argument about an issue

    Emersons efforts to examine the authority and effects ofreli ious and educational institutions hel frame

    discussions about literature and education for subsequent

    generations.

    Given the above statement develop a central thesis with

    supporting arguments about how Emersons works havehelped to frame discussions about literature and

    education.

  • 8/13/2019 Developing and Applying Tools

    12/43

    Program level assessment

    A collection of individual students writing assignments

    on constructing arguments taken from several English

    courses

    Over the course of the whole degree program

  • 8/13/2019 Developing and Applying Tools

    13/43

    Second learning outcome

    Example learning outcome:

    Students will be able to demonstrate knowledge of the

    history and the structure of the English language.

  • 8/13/2019 Developing and Applying Tools

    14/43

    Classroom level assessment

    Classroom exam

    Topics:

    History of English: Old to Early Modern English

    Topics should all relate to the learning objective

  • 8/13/2019 Developing and Applying Tools

    15/43

    Program level assessment

    Exit exam

    Questions taken from all the courses that relate to the

    learning outcome

  • 8/13/2019 Developing and Applying Tools

    16/43

    Sample assessment map

    See handout

  • 8/13/2019 Developing and Applying Tools

    17/43

    Discussion

    Have you tried this approach? What worked? What

    didnt?

    If you havent tried this, why not?

  • 8/13/2019 Developing and Applying Tools

    18/43

    Agenda

    1. Overview of SACS

    2. Mapping Assessments to Program Outcomes

    3. Writing Critical Thinking Exam Questions4. Creating Rubrics

  • 8/13/2019 Developing and Applying Tools

    19/43

    Writing Crit ical Thinking Exam Questions

    Purpose of session

    Learning Outcomes

    Critical thinking exam questions Objective and Subjective exam questions

    Application activity

    Final thoughts

  • 8/13/2019 Developing and Applying Tools

    20/43

    Purpose

    Objective:

    To compose critical thinking questions for program or

    classroom level exams

    Aligning outcomes with methods

  • 8/13/2019 Developing and Applying Tools

    21/43

    Learning Outcomes

    Program to classroom level (alignment)

    General statements to specific outcomes

    Person centered ear, spec c, an measura e

    Classroom learning outcomes should contain

    Procedure/method (assignments that will be provided)

    Behavior (what the students will do; usually the action verb)

    Criteria (how well a learner performs to be judged adequate and thequalitative description of the criteria)

  • 8/13/2019 Developing and Applying Tools

    22/43

    PhD Program Example

    Program Educational Objective: Sixty percent of graduates from the College of Education will attain positions as

    college faculty.

    (Program) Learning Outcome 1:

    Will prepare students as future researchers Graduatin students will demonstrate fundamental knowled e of uantitative,

    qualitative, and mixed research designs.

    Procedure 1.1 (Classroom learning outcome): Course EDP 382 will focus on the fundamental knowledge necessary to

    conduct quantitative research.

    Given an exam administered in EDP 382, at least 80% of students willdemonstrate a fundamental knowledge of quantitative research designs by

    achieving a score at or above an 80 out of 100. The exam will test the extent towhich students can compute common statistics, identify assumptions ofresearch designs, evaluate.

  • 8/13/2019 Developing and Applying Tools

    23/43

    Writing Crit ical Thinking

    Exam Questions

    For critical thinking:

    Focus on higher levels of Blooms taxonomy

  • 8/13/2019 Developing and Applying Tools

    24/43

    Blooms taxonomy for the cognitive domain

    Remember

    recall or memorize information

    Understand

    translate from one form to another (e.g., restate in own words)

    Apply

    Analyze

    examine a concept and break it down into parts

    Evaluate

    make judgments using standards of appraisal Create

    put information together in an unique or novel way

  • 8/13/2019 Developing and Applying Tools

    25/43

    Writing Crit ical Thinking

    Exam Questions

    For critical thinking:

    Focus on higher levels of Blooms taxonomy

    Behavior component of learning outcome ,

    of students will demonstrate a fundamental knowledge

    Action verbs (handout)

  • 8/13/2019 Developing and Applying Tools

    26/43

    Writing Crit ical Thinking

    Exam Questions

    For critical thinking:

    Focus on higher levels of Blooms taxonomy

    Behavior component of learning outcome __ ,

    students will demonstrate a fundamental knowledge

    Action verbs (handout)

    Outcome to exam questions (and instruction)

    Can use the action verb

    Ex: Compute the standard deviation of.

    Test blueprint (handout)

  • 8/13/2019 Developing and Applying Tools

    27/43

    Objective and Subjective

    Exam Questions

    Objective questions

    Select a correct response from several alternatives

    Subjective questions

    Present an original answer reng s wea nesses o eac

    Assumptions (True/ False/ or Undetermined)

    1. Essay exams require more thorough student preparation andstudy time than objective exams.

    2. Essay and objective exams can be used to measure the samecontent or ability.

    Examples of objective, critical thinking exam questions (packet)

  • 8/13/2019 Developing and Applying Tools

    28/43

    Application Activity

    In groups or pairs and with using the Emerson content

    from Dawns previous presentation,

    1. Construct one objective and one subjective examuestion.

    2. Explain why you believe your questions are assessing

    critical thinking.

  • 8/13/2019 Developing and Applying Tools

    29/43

    Application Activity

    Objective examples:

    (Analysis) Emerson might be characterized as any of thefollowing EXCEPT:

    (A) a transcendentalist

    (B) an American Renaissance writer

    (C) a public speaker

    (D) a political prophet

    (E) a literary critic

    (Evaluate) Determine whether the following statement is true orfalse:

    Melville and Hawthorne were both disillusionedtranscendentalists.

  • 8/13/2019 Developing and Applying Tools

    30/43

  • 8/13/2019 Developing and Applying Tools

    31/43

    Agenda

    1. Overview of SACS

    2. Mapping Assessments to Program Outcomes

    3. Writing Critical Thinking Exam Questions4. Creating Rubrics

  • 8/13/2019 Developing and Applying Tools

    32/43

    1.What is a rubric?

    2.When should you use a rubric?

    3.What are the elements of a rubric?

    Creating Rubrics

    4.How do you create a rubric?

  • 8/13/2019 Developing and Applying Tools

    33/43

    What is a rubric?

    -A scoring guideline that measures student

    achievement systematically:

    specifies instructor expectations

    lists performance criteria

    describes levels of quality

  • 8/13/2019 Developing and Applying Tools

    34/43

    When should you use a rubric?

    On assignments that require subjective grading

    Places structure on a subjective process

    Essa s

    Presentations

    Multi-media

  • 8/13/2019 Developing and Applying Tools

    35/43

    What are the elements of a rubric?

    What the

    student needs

    to do

    Descriptors and criteriathat identify performance

    expectation for each

    point on the scale

    I.

    Example:

    Include a compelling, descriptive, and persuasive

    conclusion that summarizes arguments set forth inpaper

  • 8/13/2019 Developing and Applying Tools

    36/43

    Standards that identify

    the range of quality orperformance levels

    How well the

    student does itII.

    Example:--no or poor conclusion or summary of argument

    --some summary of points made, but nothing beyond

    summary; no broad conclusions/lessons

    --

    a conclusion going beyond summary of what was written inthe body of the essay

  • 8/13/2019 Developing and Applying Tools

    37/43

    A scale of points

    awarded to specificelements of student

    performance

    III.

    What score the

    student willreceive

    5 = outstanding

    3 = acceptable

    1 = poor

  • 8/13/2019 Developing and Applying Tools

    38/43

    Critical Thinking Rubric

    A. Clearly and precisely

    analyzes key information,

    questions, and problems

    B. Uses inference to reason

    carefully from clearly stated

    premises to important

    A. Is unable to analyze

    information, questions, and

    problems or does so

    superficially

    B. Is unable to or infrequently

    uses inference to reason

    1 [2 3 4] 5

    implications and

    consequences

    C. Uses deductive and

    inductive reasoning and

    problem-solving skills

    consistently and with ease

    from clearly stated premises

    or recognize implications and

    consequences

    C. Is unable to or infrequently

    uses deductive and

    inductive reasoning andproblem-solving skills

  • 8/13/2019 Developing and Applying Tools

    39/43

    Analytic Rubrics

    Holistic Rubrics

  • 8/13/2019 Developing and Applying Tools

    40/43

    How do you create a rubric?

    Develop assignment Identify learning objectives

    Decide which criteria to evaluate

    Decide what kind of rubric to use Define performance indicators

    Identify standards of performance

    Decide on grading or scoring scale Review rubric to ensure it measures what you intend

  • 8/13/2019 Developing and Applying Tools

    41/43

    Determine key criteria

    If the assignment

    objectives are

    then consider these criteria

    Creative products Wow factor, novelty

    Technical quality

    Adherence to conventions of the field

    Development of ideas

    Clarity

    Oral presentation Voice projection

    Body language

    Organization

  • 8/13/2019 Developing and Applying Tools

    42/43

    Identify Indicators

    Concrete sign or evidence of a criterion beingmetnot meant to be exhaustive

    Example:

    Learning objective: Students will be able to write in

    Criterion: Student clearly and precisely analyzes

    key information, questions, and problems

    Indicator:

    Identifies main tension in story and relates itto sub-plots

  • 8/13/2019 Developing and Applying Tools

    43/43