detection of the intrinsic size of sagittarius a* with closure amplitude imaging
DESCRIPTION
Detection of the Intrinsic Size of Sagittarius A* with Closure Amplitude Imaging. Geoffrey C. Bower UC Berkeley. Team Closure. Backer, D.C. (UCB) Falcke, H. (MPIfR) Goss, W.M. (NRAO) Herrnstein, R. (CfA/Columbia) Zhao, J.-H. (CfA) Science , accepted. What We Want to See What We See. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Detection of the Intrinsic Size of Sagittarius A* with Closure Amplitude Imaging
Geoffrey C. Bower
UC Berkeley
Team Closure
Backer, D.C. (UCB) Falcke, H. (MPIfR) Goss, W.M. (NRAO) Herrnstein, R. (CfA/Columbia) Zhao, J.-H. (CfA)
Science, accepted
What We Want to See What We See
7mm VLBA
Scattering Inhibits Imaging &Points to Higher Frequencies
Lo et al. 1998
Difficulty of mm Imaging SgrA* Axisymmetric Structure
Purely an amplitude measurement Low Declination & High Frequency
Poor and variable antenna gain Variable opacity High Tsys Short and variable coherence time Lack of North-South resolution
Solution Closure Amplitudes
Closure Amplitude Properties
Independent of station-based gain errors Still dependent on baseline-based errors
Decorrelation Reduced sensitivity
2/3 for N=7 Non-Gaussian errors
Doeleman et al. 2000 --- 3mm imaging
Cmnpq = -----------------VmnVpq
VmqVnp
Data & Techniques
New and archival VLBA & VLA data 10Q, 4K, 1U, 2X, 2C, 3L
Fringe-fit, form c.a. Non-linear model-fitting
of c.a. Grid of models around
best-fit solution to determine errors
Results: 43 GHz
Equal Scales
New Results:Deviation from Scattering
0.3 cm 20 cm
10 Q, 4 K, 1 U, 2X, 2C, 3L experiments
0.3 cm 20 cm
Alternatives
Errors in modeling Monte Carlo simulations show we get what we put in
Phase decorrelation No change in intrinsic size with 15-120 sec averaging time
Multiple components Reduced chi^2 not improved
Refractive effects Observations over a short span give larger 7mm size
Slope = 1.96 +/- 0.01 Strongly inconsistent with scattering theory! Weakly inconsistent with data
Intrinsic Size
New scattering law derived Major Axis
24 +/- 2 Rs at 0.69 cm Alpha_size = 1.6 +/- 0.2 Flare in 1/9 Q band epochs: 60 +25 -15%
Minor Axis 26 +/- 6 Rs at 0.69 cm < Lo et al size Alpha_size= 2.2 +/- 0.5
Intrinsic Size
Emission/Accretion Implications Axisymmetry? Tb > 1010 λ-1.2 K Requires inhomogeneous models
Inconsistent with ADAF, single zone models Jet RIAF
Source comparable to Rs at 1.3mm Physics in strong gravity
BH mass density 4 x 104 Msun AU-3
What’s Next?
Add GBT at 7mm Links SC/HN to rest of
array Increased SNR for
closure amplitude 3mm Model-dependent
deconvolution
The Future
Meeting Friday after dinner