detailed project report -...
TRANSCRIPT
Pali IWMP-23/11-12
Block-Sojat, District –Pali
Detailed Project Report
Macro/Micro no- (6)- 20/2, 20/3, 20/4, 20/5, 20/6, 20/7b
Total Geographical Area- 4736.17 ha
Proposed Area- 4650 ha
Cost/hectare- 15000/ha
Total Cost- 697.5 lac
Villages Covered- (5)- Butealao, Kharianeev, Rupawas, Lundawas and Chamdiyakwas
Gram Panchayat-(3)- Meo, Kharianeev and Rupawas
PIA – Foundation for Ecological Security P.S: Sojat, District: Pali
PROJECT MANAGER, WCDC W.D. & S.C., DISTRICT – Pali
GOVERNMENT OF RAJASTHAN RURAL DEVELOPMENT & PANCHAYATI RAJ DEPARTMENT
(WATERSHED DEVELOPMENT & SOIL CONSERVATION)
Project at a Glance
1. Name of watershed : Integrated Watershed Management
Programme
2. Total watershed area : 4650 ha
3. Macro watershed number : 20
4. Micro-watershed number : Macro: 20 [Micro 2,3,4,5,6,7b]
5. Gram Panchayat : Rupawas, Kharianeev, Meo
6. Villages in watershed area : Rupawas, Kharianeev, Butealao, Lundawas,
Chamdiyakwas
7. Panchayat Samiti : Sojat
8. Tehsil : Sojat
9. Name of project : Sojat IWMP-23/11-12
10. Budget : 697.5 lakh
11. Sanction number and date of project : F18(1-88)part –II/DWDSC/IWMP-
VI/195-214, 23/4/2012
12. Deviation from project sanction : No deviation
Items As per project sanction As proposed in DPR
Project area 4650 4650
Macro/ Micro
No. Macro: 20 [Micro 2,3,4,5,6,7b]
Macro: 20 [Micro 2,3,4,5,6,7b]
Name of gram
panchayats
Rupawas, Kharianeev, Meo Rupawas, Kharianeev, Meo
Name of
village
Rupawas, Kharianeev,
Butealao, Lundawas,
Chamdiyakwas
Rupawas, Kharianeev, Butealao,
Lundawas, Chamdiyakwas
Project cost
(Rs. In lacs) 697.5 lakh 697.5 lakh
Source of data: Sanction letter and WAPCOS limited
Contents
Page No
1. Introduction
2. Conceptual Buildup: Strengthening Watershed Development Work
3. Project Purpose, Objectives and Outcomes
Chapterization
1) Chapter
1) Location 2) General Features of watershed (Cost and Area details) 3) Climatic and Hydrological information 4) Other Development Schemes in the project area 5) Details of infrastructure in the project areas 6) Institutional arrangements (,DWDU,PIA,WDT,WC) 7) Problem Analysis and Scope
2) Chapter: Basic Data, Analysis and Scope
1. Demography Details 2. Development Indicators 3. Land use 4. Agriculture status and Productivity Gap Analysis 5. Horticulture/Vegetable/Floriculture status 6. Land holding pattern 7. Livestock status 8. Fodder status 9. Farm Implements 10. NREGS Status 11. Migration details 12. Livelihood Details. 13. Existing SHG 14. Ground Water details 15. Drinking Water Status 16. Water use efficiency 17. Slope details 18. Water Budgeting 19. Soil Details 20. Soil erosion status
3) Chapter Proposed Development Plan
4) Chapter Activity wise Total Abstract of cost
5) Chapter Annual Action Plan
a) Project fund b) Convergence Plan
6) Chapter Project outcomes
7) Technical designs and estimates for proposed activities
8) Enclosures
Location –District, block, village, watershed location map
Map of IWMP-23 Project with Watershed Boundary demarcation in cadastral map
PRA Map (along with photos & paper drawing)
Cadastral Map on watershed boundary
Land Use Land Cover map
Information on existing water harvesting structures and well inventory along with
GPS coordinates
Documents of Agreement:
Proceedings of Gram Sabha for EPA approval
Proceedings of Gram Sabha Resolution for committee constitution
Proceedings of Gram Sabha for DPR approval
Proceedings of Standing Committee of P.S for DPR approval
Proceedings of Standing Committee of Z.P for DPR approval
Introduction:
The Government of Rajasthan and Foundation for Ecological Security has signed an agreement in
May 18 2012 for implementation of the ―IWMP-23‖ watershed in Sojat Tehsil of Pali district. It has
been proposed to develop 4650 ha through budgetary support from Government of India and
Government of Rajasthan under Integrated Watershed Management Programme [IWMP-23].
Acknowledging the potential of watershed development, the project aims to promote sustainable
livelihoods through strengthening the ecological and institutional foundation in the area.
The project will guide an intervention which is anchored on people‘s engagement at various levels
and is based on the specific characteristics of the socio-economic-ecological settings, to foster a
healthy relationship between livelihoods and natural surroundings and offer stable economic
opportunities. In translating this to action, it is essential to realistically assess the potential of the
farming system, common and private resources, and soil, water, biodiversity and nutrient capacity.
The scope of the desired intervention is in terms of bringing equilibrium between supply and
demand both quantitatively and qualitatively, so as to develop a balance between appropriation
and production needs. Realistic assessment and movement towards a balanced land use and
livelihood strategies would significantly depend on the strength and character of the institutions of
collective management and regulation.
FES as the Project Implementing Agency (PIA) would make efforts towards engaging with different
stakeholders in initiating and strengthening systems of collective management over land and
water. Village level institutions would be strengthened to put in place good governance for
development and equitable appropriation of commons. Capacities of the Watershed Development
Committees, User Groups and Self Help Groups would be enabled for the post-project operation
and maintenance and further development of the assets created during the project period.
Adoption of low cost and indigenous technology would be promoted. Convergence of additional
financial resources from other government programmes such as MGNREGA, National Horticulture
Mission, Rashtriya krishi Vikas Yojana, be facilitated. The project thus, provides a unique
opportunity to work on issues of ecological security and improvement in the well being of the
different sections of the society and will guide the planning, implementation and the capacity
building aspects. Keeping in view the watershed-based development approach, a detailed project
report has been prepared to guide the implementation process. During the preparation of the
report detailed discussions and negotiations with the community and the village level institutions
were conducted to analyze the need reflected by the individual household level survey, primary
data and secondary sources of data. Sequential capacity building programmes were organised
with PRI representatives, community members and Watershed committee aimed at enabling
capacities to understand information‘s and assist in the planning process of the DPR preparation.
During the process of planning the entry point activities [EPA] had become the epicenter of the
village level discussions, and the community members who were monitoring the EPA activities
were capacitated to prepare the village level activity plan & budget on the basis of the local need
and also the monitoring management plan for effective & efficient implementation.
Conceptual Build-up: Strengthening Watershed Development Approach
Rural poverty is mostly associated with recurrent occurrences of drought, poor maintenance and
degradation of natural resources. Degradation of land and water resources particularly in the semi
arid areas has led to adverse economic and ecological consequences in contemporary rural
society, where survival, sustenance and growth are intimately linked to the health and productivity
of the surrounding natural resources. In the recent past, several interventions were made to
reduce poverty through drought-proof technologies. Transition in climate and degradation of
Natural Resources is one of the reasons for the increasing popularity of the Watershed
Development approach. Watershed Development has huge prospects in transforming rural lives
and looks into a holistic process of:
Introducing new knowledge and technology.
Appreciating, maintaining and adapting traditional knowledge.
Building effective exchange systems through a diverse set of institutional arrangements.
Building and strengthening specific, responsive, accountable and adaptive systems.
Although in general ‗guidelines‘ and conceptual documents incorporate these elements, specific
focus on only one or two components have led to limited success in fulfilling the major objectives
of watershed development programmes. In this respect specific attention needs to be given to
further strengthen watershed development approach. Some of the key issues highlighted for this
are:
a) Addressing comprehensively the micro-drivers of change:
Watershed development projects have huge potential to address the micro-drivers effectively.
However the degree to which the various drivers in the three major components of social-
economic-ecological aspects are comprehensively addressed in watershed development projects
leaves much to be desired. The degree to which these drivers are properly understood and
incorporated in watershed management plans will directly influence how much the project is able
to influence the various aspects of livelihood strategies.
Another important aspect is comprehensively looking both the supply side enhancement measures
and the demand side management measures in watershed development programs. Focusing only
on the supply side enhancement measures has been unable to ensure sustainable and judicious
use of the resources created. Demand management through better socio-institutional capability,
technological adoption etc., would need to be properly incorporated in the project design to impart
sustainability to resource management practices.
b) Watershed development and adaptive management
Watershed management has several characteristics which include:
Multiple stakeholders with multiple interests.
Complex ecological systems with a variety of land use.
High level of uncertainty and many unknown factors.
This makes watershed management a complex process requiring a learning approach based
on a process of experimental decision-making and monitoring. Adaptive management has
been developed to address these characteristics and ‗is an approach for managing the
complex systems based on incremental, experiential learning and decision making, supported
by active ongoing monitoring and feedback from the effects of outcomes of decisions‘. It
involves the process of building social capital among stakeholders for collaboration and
learning, and knowledge sharing among group members.
i. Watershed development with an Integrated Landscape Restoration Program
Watershed projects should be seen as means to put in sustainable land-use planning.
Landscape Restoration Approach (LRA) is a process that aims to regain ecological integrity
and enhance human well being in degraded landscapes. Key aspects of LRA are that it
focuses on:
Restoration decision on how best to restore functionality, that is, the goods, services and
processes that the different components of landscape delivers.
It recognizes that both the solutions to neither the complex land use problems nor the
outcomes of a particular course of action can be predicted accurately, especially as
ecosystems and land-use patterns change over time.
It recognizes the need for multi-solution approach to provide the practitioners with
sufficient flexibility to address the complex issues.
Landscape constitutes of different components and the pattern in which these components are
distributed makes each landscape a unique one. Based on the location specificities landscape
can be classified as agricultural landscape, pasture landscape, forest landscape, or even
more. In improving watershed management approach the value of this framework is not only in
clearly envisioning specific restoration plans for each components but also in establishing the
links with different landscape component and its contribution for specific landscape
restoration.
ii. Addressing groundwater in watershed development projects
In context of Rajasthan more than 80% of water requirement are met from groundwater
sources. However in most of the watershed development programs interaction with this
important aspect leaves much to be desired. Groundwater exploitation problems can be
classified under two broad problems:
i. Aquifer Overexploitation (Overdevelopment): Aquifer overexploitation or
overdevelopment is prolonged process of groundwater withdrawal from an aquifer
leading to persistent falls in groundwater level as the rate of withdrawal is more than
the average annual replenishment rate.
ii. Groundwater mining: Groundwater mining can be used for those situations of
groundwater use where aquifer is having a predominantly non-renewable resources
and the reduction in aquifer reserves is essentially permanent.
In both these situations an adaptive approach to management has to be adopted, recognizing
the risks and uncertainties at the outset to reduce subsequent conflicts. Unplanned depletion
of groundwater reserves can undermine, and potentially erode, the economic and social
vitality of the traditional groundwater-dependent community and instances of the collapse of
such rural communities are known. Hence, there is need to plan the exploitation of
groundwater resources, and guide their utilization with a view to making communities better
socio-economically prepared for coping with increasing water stress due to depleting aquifer
storage.
Groundwater management can be widely classified as:
i. Unplanned exploitation and depletion
ii. Planned exploitation and depletion.
iii. Planned exploitation and recovery.
In Rajasthan, a mix of ‗ii‘ and ‗iii‘ strategies is required to cope with the looming crisis. In areas
where the geological settings are such that low recharge rates are prevalent ‗planned exploitation
and depletion‘ needs to be put up in consultation with all the stakeholders. In such scenarios
based on the supply side characteristics ‗planned recovery‘ can also be put up. In regions where
geological setting promote recharge regulated use with supply side enhancement measures can
help in not only reducing the trajectory of the fall of groundwater in given time frame but also will
be able to ensure that the system recovers after depletion to an optimum state.
e. Developing a comprehensive governance agenda
Conservation, protection and judicious use of resources depend on establishing strong
governance function at the community level. Crafting and strengthening strong community
institutions is the first critical aspect of this process. These institutions at the first level ensure the
sustainability of site level restoration actions, which with the capacity building and enthused
collective actions can also translate in governance function on other components of landscape.
Simultaneously, there is also a need to strengthen institutions which can take up governance
agenda to a higher scale from these ‗micro level‘ institutions.
The 73rd amendment to the Constitution of India has entrusted the Panchayats with 29 functions
enabling them to be effective governance institutions. Therefore capacitating the Panchayats to be
resource/knowledge centers in terms of not only developing them as institutions which have
adequate knowledge of the resources they inhabit, but also centers of planning and regulatory
bodies in close association with micro-level institutions can set in strong sustainability to
community based natural resource management plan. The proposed second layer of institutional
structure therefore can also be associations of Panchayats and micro-level institutions governing
an area which they associate themselves with in social-economical-ecological terms. Also keeping
in the complexity of such process, there is a need for these institutions to involve experts, different
government departments, other agencies and local leaders in setting up an effective governance
structure.
Project Purpose, Objectives and Outcomes:
The broad purposes of the project are:
a. Strengthen the capacity of village institutions and Panchayats to implement and support
watershed development plan.
b. Restore functionality of different landscape components comprehensive approach to
conservation to deliver intended goods and services.
c. Restore ecological integrity by increasing flow of nutrients, water and biomass across the
landscape with improved biodiversity and stabilized production systems.
d. Increase household incomes through strengthening current livelihood strategies,
introducing new ones and diversifying sources of income.
In this context, the objective of the project would be:
To assist village communities in obtaining tenure on public land or usufructs and initiating
strengthening systems of collective management and governance over land and water, in
a contiguous area to draw on the advantages of its ecological and social structure.
To increase the availability of biomass through revegetation of the marginal lands and
increased availability of surface and ground water through soil and moisture conservation
and retention measures.
To assist communities in effectively integrating animal husbandry, agriculture and natural
resources management and in regulating the demand for biomass and water through
rules, regulations and mechanisms evolved by community institutions at village and inter
village levels
Landscape planning and management brings the conservation fully into the rural
development discourse by highlighting the importance of ecosystem services in supporting
continued agricultural production. It emphasizes both the need and the opportunity to
foster synergies among conservation, agricultural production, livestock production and
rural livelihoods.
To strengthen the village level and meso-level governance of biomass and water
resources by village communities, including involvement of Panchayats in addressing
natural resource management along with other initiatives of the Government, Multilateral
agencies.
To promote partnerships between the village communities, academia, civil society and
district administration that collectively envision, develop and implement land use plans for
the conservation and judicious use of natural resources.
To promote convergence by implementing watershed works in private land through
different ongoing development schemes.
Implementation of the project for seven years would result in the following
outcome:
Strong collective management by village institutions over their landscape, with appropriate
tenure arrangements, in contiguous areas in each location. As the setting and level of
discussion in each of the institutions would vary, processes on appropriation and
production would be at different levels of maturity and intensity. However, processes on
integration of various components of the ecosystem, an assessment of their status and a
proactive course of action would be evolved by the communities within and across
habitations.
Improved biomass and biodiversity of common lands and increased availability of surface
as well as recharge of ground water.
Effective integration of animal husbandry, agriculture and natural resources management
and the demand for biomass and water regulated through rules, regulations and
mechanisms evolved by communities at village and inter village levels.
Village level and meso-level governance of biomass and water resources by village
communities, strengthened along with the involvement of Panchayats, government, civil
society, other agencies etc.
Landscape planning and management engaging different actors (scientific experts,
professionals and village communities) in an informed, iterative and participatory planning
process. This planning process through understanding alternative future scenarios helps
to encourage informed discussions of alternatives. The discussion leads to a landscape
plan that is adaptive in terms of implementation, monitoring and learning.
CHAPTER I
Chapter I
1) Location
Sojat is situated between 25.92°N 73.67°E. It is at a distance of 7 km from its block head quarters
and 38 kms from the district head quarters. It has an average elevation of 263 mts from mean sea
level. The average annual temperature ranges between 28-34°C and rainfall ranges between 170-
370 mm. Spanning over an area of 4650 ha, the project area encompasses five villages in three of
the Panchayats in the Tehsil. The topography is both undulating as well as plain. The district is a
part of the Luni river basin.
There are 5 no of habitations in the project area and the other details are given below.
2) General Features of watershed (Cost and Area details)
S.No. Name of
Project(as per
GOI)
Pali IWMP-
23/11-12
(a) Name of
Catchment
Butealao
(b) Name of
watershed
area(local name)
Butealao
(c ) Project Area 4650
(d) Net treatable Area 4650
e) Cost of Project 6.975 cr
f) Cost/hectare 15000.00
g) Year of Sanction 2011-2012
h) Watershed Code 060420
i) No. of Gram
Panchayats in
project area
3
j) No. of villages in
project area
5
k) Type of Project Desert
l) Elevation (metres) 263mts
m) Major streams 1st
n) Slope range (%) 0-3
Macro/micro Name of Gram
Panchayat
Name of
Villages
Covered
Census code of villages Area
20/2 Kharianeev Kharianeev 0820000302415100 453.44
20/3 Kharianeev Kharianeev 0820000302415100 329.57
20/3 Kharianeev Chamdiyak 0820000302415200 16.08
20/4 Kharianeev Kharianeev 0820000302415100 61.16
20/4 Meo Butealao 0820000302415000 67.11
20/5 Meo Butealao 0820000302415000 404.91
20/5 Rupawas Rupawas 0820000302414900 201.08
20/6 Kharianeev Kharianeev 0820000302415100 0.57
20/6 Kharianeev Chamdiyak 0820000302415200 30.11
20/6 Rupawas Rupawas 0820000302414900 303.77
20/6 Meo Butealao 0820000302415000 163.35
20/7b Meo Butealao 0820000302415000 366.3
20/7b Kharianeev Chamdiyak 0820000302415200 630.56
20/7b Rupawas Lundawas 0820000302415300 36.69
20/7b Rupawas Rupawas 0820000302414900 1300.63
20/7b Kharianeev Kharianeev 0820000302415100 100
Source: Sanction letter and Wapcos limited
3) Climatic and Hydrological information
The watershed falls in IIB-Transitional Plain of Luni Basin. The soil texture is sandy loam. The
average rainfall is 75-100 mm. The temperatures in the area are in the range between 45°C during
summer and 2°C during winter. The major crops in the
area are Mehendi, Sonamukhi, Bajra, Jowar, Till,
Mustard, Moong, Moth. 66% land is under cultivation, 2%
land fallow, 13.96 % land is wasteland. 4% land is
irrigated through open wells and tube wells. 149 no of
households are BPL (9.9% households), 275 are
landless households (9.7 % households) and 409
household are small and marginal farmers(
28%household). Average land holding in the area is 1.5
to 2.5 ha. 66.64% area is single cropped area and 9.5%
is double cropped. The main source of irrigation is
private well. The average annual rainfall (5 years) in the
area is 335.6 mm. The Major streams in the
Watershed are Sukhri. The major festivals in the
village are Holi, Dussera and Raksha bandhan. At
present this villages have 7642 population with
Communities like Rajputs, Dewasi, Kumawat,
Meghwal, Jat, Choudhary, Bhati etc
Source: internet
Climatic and Hydrological information
1 Average Annual Rainfall(mm)
Year Average Annual
Rainfall(mm)
1 2003 397
2 2004 321
3 2005 353
4 2006 430
5 2007 584
6 2008 428
7 2009 172
8 2010 64
9 2011 548
10 2012 520
2 Average
Monthly
rainfall (last
ten years)
Month Rainfall(mm)
1 June 32.63
2 July 114.57
3 August 165.7
4 September 78.4
3 Maximum
rainfall
intensity (mm)
Duration rainfall
intensity(mm)
i) 15 minute
duration
38 mm
ii) 30 minute
duration
25 mm
iii) 60 minute
duration
17 mm
4 Temperature
(Degree C)
Season Max Min
i) Summer
Season
49 34
ii) Winter
Season
5 27
iii) Rainy
Season
35 18
5 Potential
Evaporation
Transpiration
(PET)
(mm/day)
Season PET
i) Summer 4.5
ii) Winter 2.7
iii) Rainy 2
6 Runoff
i) Peak Rate
(cum/hr)
ii) Total run off
volume of
rainy season
(ha.m.)
341.3 mm
iii) Time of
return of
maximum
flood
5 years
20
years
0
5
years
iv)Periodicity
of Drought in
village area
3 years
3
years
Source of data: Tehsil Record and internet Run off calculation on the basis of rainy days having rainfall 18mm or more
Year Days Rain 2003 8 245
2004 7 497
2005 5 178
2006 10 356
2007 7 474
2008 7 262
2009 6 115
2010 13 494
2011 9 343
2012 12 449
Total 84 3413
Source of data: Tehsil Record
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Year wise rainy days and rain fall in 18 mm/day and above
Days
Rain
Ecological Profile: The major ecosystem types of whole of Sojat area can be broadly classified into:
1. Natural Ecosystems
Terrestrial Ecosystem
Forest Ecosystem
Grassland Ecosystem
Aquatic Ecosystem
Lentic (Standing-water like ponds/lakes/Reservoirs)
2. Man-engineered Ecosystems
Cropland Ecosystem
Farmland Ecosystem
Forest Ecosystem:
The forest ecosystem occupies a very meagre portion of area in the region. The region falls under
the Tropical Thorn Forest. The major species found are Prosopis Juliflora, Acacia nilotica,
Prosopis cineraria, Caparis aphylla etc.
Grass land Ecosystem:
Grassland ecosystem is a type of terrestrial ecosystem. Grasslands occupy comparatively huge
stretches of landscape. Nearly 33% of the area is under permanent pastures under the project
area. This grassland is at degradation stage due to over grazing and lack of management by the
community. Cenchrus biflorus, Cenchrus setigurus, Cynodon dactylon, Desmotachya bipinnat,
Aristida, Eleusine Compress, Desmotachya Bipinnat, Oropitium Thomaeu, Dactyloctenium
Aegyptium, Arachne Racemosa, E. Tenuifolia, E. Poaeoides, Eragrostis Tomentosa , E. Tenella,
E. Poaeoides, E. Cilianensisare a few of the grass species found in the region.
Cenchrus setigurus is highly preferred by the community as it is considered good for milk
production amongst ruminants as well as its palatable. The species is a
perennial, and where available it can be grazed upon through the year. One
may also note that the plant has medicinal value, being used in the treatment
of bile (pith).
Cynodon dactylon species is a common grass found invariably in the vicinity of tanks and nadis
and along the river bank, where it tends to form a turf. With water it can last through the year. In
general however the species obtains widely only during the monsoon months. As a fodder it has
few equals, and all animals consume it readily.
Desmotachya Bipinnata, locally known as Dabdi or Dhaab. In appearance, this is a tall perennial
characterised by a profuse and stout rooting system. The branching roots make the species an
excellent sand binder. It is consequently worth noting that the species is consumed by all species
of animals, when young it is regarded as a fairly good quality pasture, although it is not as well
regarded once it matures.
Among the perennials in this family another fairly important source of grazing is the species,
Eleusine Compressa known locally as Ghoda Dhob. A prostrate, profusely branched and widely
spreading perennial, the leaves of the plant are flat and somewhat stiff. Eleusine Compressa is
regarded as especially suitable grazing for cattle. The species most abundantly near small pools,
ponds etc
Aristida is one of the species which is abundantly found in the pasture land, which serves good
fodder during monsoon as green fodder.
Arachne Racemosa and Dactyloctenium Aegyptiumare two species found in the region, and
serves as a good fodder for the livestock.A characteristic of the species is its widely spreading
rooting system.
Flora &Fauna
Prosopis Juliflora or vilayti babool, as it is known throughout Rajasthan, is an African relative of the
desi babool. It was introduced into the Indian sub-continent in the last quarter century, by the
forest department with the objective of increasing green cover. In this it has been an immense
success, for the species has proliferated with a rapidly unmatched by any other species of large
vegetation, and is today a visible and important member of most desert habitats. Due to its
allelopathic characteristics it doesn‘t allow any other plants to grow in the area. It is invasive in
nature and covers huge patches of land specially pastureland. Due to its invasive nature it
becomes difficult to carry out revegetation measures. Further, it is also found as vegetative fence
around the farm land in the area. Presence of Prosopis juliflora is also an indication of saline belt
in the region. Goats consume the pods and young leaves as fodder. Juliflora has also out
numbered Salvadoraceae which was found in abundance in the region.
‗Jal‘ or ‗Salvadoraceae‘ which is of two types- one is ‗Khari jal‘, its fruits are small and are eaten
only by birds, and the other one is ‗Meethi Jal‘ which has sweet fruits, and which are sold in
village. These fruits ripen in the months of May-June.
‗Kair‘- Capparis Decidue, is abundantly found in the area whose fruit is consumed. It is a very
useful tree since its fruit is also consumed by camels. It‘s a good source of fuel wood because
even if the wood from it is moist, it burns easily.
Indigofera Linifolia locally called Lambia Bekaria, Indigofera Sessiliflora known
as called Gur Bekari and Indigofera Hochstteri are found in the region. The
important feature of these three species is that each of them is readily
consumed by all animals, and are in fact considered to be extremely high
quality pasture. Indigofera Sessiliflora is thought to increase milk in cows. It is also much favoured
by sheep. The species Indigofera Linifolia, apart from being well regarded as a source of pasture,
is also a source of food for the poor in time of scarcity, the seeds of the plant being pounded and
mixed with flour. Both these species of Indigofera are useful for grazing for about four months in
the year.
Azadiracta indica is another dominant species found in abundance in the region which serves as
fodder for goats, provides shade, fruits are consumed by birds and goats, purifies the environment,
used as ―datoon‖, is an excellent antifungal, antidiabetic, antibacterial. It grows well in well drained
deep and sandy soil. The neem tree is noted for its drought resistance. Normally it thrives in areas
with sub-arid to sub-humid conditions. It can grow in regions with an annual rainfall below 400 mm,
but in such cases it depends largely on ground water levels. It is a typical tropical to subtropical
tree and exists at annual mean temperatures between 21–32 °C (70–90 °F). It can tolerate high to
very high temperatures and does not tolerate temperature below 4 °C (39 °F). Neem is a life-giving
tree, especially for the dry coastal, southern districts of India and Pakistan. It is one of the very few
shade-giving trees that thrive in the drought-prone areas.
Another frequently encountered species from this family was Alhagi
Pseudalhagi, known locally by the names Nuddhi ki Moraili or Juansa. It is a
small erect shrub, armed with sharp long spines. It is used as camel fodder,
since the leaves come out in the hot season, when there is not much green
vegetation.
Another important member of this family from the point of grazing needs, in the
species Crotalaria Medicaginea. In matter of fact, the species is a widespread
one. This species is known locally by the names Jojri as well as Unt Ghoogra.
While all animals consume the species quite readily, and shepherds value it as
a fodder, the species is particularly suited to camels. Camel men often harvest bundles of this
species, to feed the camels when they are at rest. The niche of this species is largely confined to
fallow fields, where they sprout after the harvest.
A relatively infrequent species from this family was Puppalia Lappacea, known locally as Undha
Bunti or Undio Bhurut, because of the inverted appearance of its flowers. A useful fodder, it is
eaten by all animals, but does not make for the best quality of grazing. For camels however, the
species is a preferred grazing.
Prosopis cineraria also known as Sanger Khejri, is found in the region on the farm
land. The leaves and pods are consumed by livestock and are beneficial forage.
In Rajasthan, India, P. cineraria is grown in an agroforestry setting in conjunction with
millet. The tree is well-suited for an agroforestry setting, because it has a single-
layered canopy, it is a nitrogen fixer (thus enriching the soil), and its deep roots avoid
competition for water with crops.
Zizyphus nummularia is widely found in common land. Leaves are collected, dried and stored. The
dried leaves, called pala, are used as fodder for goats and cows. The fruits are eaten and when
dried are used medicinally in Ayurved.
Pond/Reservoir Ecosystem
A pond as a whole serves a good example of a fresh water ecosystem. Sojat is a drought prone
area. Therefore, traditionally, ponds/reservoirs/water bodies have been developed at many places
to meet the water requirement/availability for domestic consumption, irrigation use as well as
livestock drinking during stress period mostly. Coincidentally, these water bodies provide very
good aquatic habitats.
These ponds are a self-sufficient and self-regulating system. They are very rich in basic inorganic
and organic compounds, such as water itself, carbon dioxide gas, oxygen gas, calcium, nitrogen,
phosphates, amino acids, humic acid, etc. Some proportions of nutrients are in solution state but
most of them are present as stored in particulate matter as well as in living organisms. Various
organisms that constitute the biotic component like Potamogeton, Hydrilla, Vallisneria, Utricularia,
Azolla, Lemna, Oscillatoria, Anabaena, Chlamydomonas, Spirula etc. A few insects and both small
and large fishes are found in various ponds or lakes.
Non-perennial River Ecosystem
Major river of Sojat is Sukhri. The river is annual and water is seen during the monsoon and by
post winter the water gets dried up. Not only this stored water provide water for irrigation and
drinking purposes of the people, the reservoirs act as pond/lake ecosystem as well. Ecologically
also, these water systems are very important. Several aquatic life forms emerge during the period
of water-flow, but as soon as they dry up in winter and summer, the aquatic life suddenly
disappears.
As they drive up, the entire tract of their courses glows with the shinning of sands. Large deposits
of gravels and pebbles also occur along the banks. The riverbeds of some of these rivers are
predominantly composed of hard rocks, exposed and literally dead. Though some small life forms
occur sporadically where the stagnant water is found along the course.
Cropland Ecosystem
Cropland ecosystems are artificial or man-engineered, where, in order to obtain more food, cloth,
timber, medicines and other useful products, man becomes responsible for the replacement of
natural systems. To secure maximum production, man makes much planned manipulations in the
physico-chemical environment. These include addition of fertilizers to soil, use of chemicals for
disease control, proper irrigation practices etc. Thus, a cropland ecosystem is an artificial system
aimed primarily to grow a single species of one‘s choice.
We have ecosystems of dominant crop species like jowar, wheat, bajra, mehendi, sonamukhi etc.
under suitable conditions of their growth and yield. It is generally argued that in a natural
ecosystem, the nature maximizes for gross production, whereas in an artificial ecosystem, man
maximizes for net production. In a cropland ecosystem, there is not necessarily an increase in the
total dry matter production of the whole plants, but generally most of the production goes into grain
and less into leaves, stems and roots. Thus, in agriculture, there is an objective to achieve high
rate of production (P) of readily harvestable products with little standing crop (B) left in the field for
accumulation or we may say that there is a high P/B efficiency. Nature, on the other hand, follows
just the reverse efficiency, i.e. a high B/P ratio where the standing crop is generally accumulated to
its maximum.
The pattern of interconnectedness among different components of ecosystem:
Every ecosystem comprises of two major components: Abiotic and Biotic. They are intricately
inter-twined and dependent on each other, and ensure a delicate but complex ecological linkage
leading to nutritional and energy flow through various trophic levels both within and between
ecosystems. The pattern of inter-connectedness among different components of ecosystems
therefore, lies in its explicit recognition of complexity, interaction, functional processes and change
over time. Functionally, there is a constant exchange of matter and energy between the physical
environment and the living community. Structurally, different components of ecosystems can be
represented as follows:
Abiotic Component
These include the climatic conditions such as rainfall, temperature, wind velocity, frost, hail,
humidity etc. are suitable for the above mentioned crops, especially maize.
Biotic Component
The various living organisms in the food chain are as follows:
o Producers:
The dominant plant species would naturally be Bajra, Mehendi, Sonamukhi,
Moong etc. A number of weeds like Cynodon dactylon, Launnea nudicaulis, ,
Cyprus rotundus, Digitaria Spp., Alysicarpus spp. also contribute to primary
production of the field.
o Consumers:
Primary consumers are herbivores represented by a variety of animals, big as well
as small Blue bull, goats, cows etc Larger animals are rats, birds and man feeding
on bajra and jowar. Secondary consumers are carnivores like frogs and some
birds that eat insects. Tertiary consumers are carnivores like snakes and hawks
which feed on the secondary consumers: frogs and small birds. Decomposers are
microbes present in soil as well as air that decompose the dead organic matter of
plants and animals. These are chiefly bacteria, Actinomycetes and fungi
responsible for decay, decompositions and humification making the minerals
available again to the producers.
Interdependence of different Ecosystems:
Consequent to the manipulation and exploitation of the natural environment by tremendous human
pressure, the natural ecosystems are shrinking and gradually vanishing into oblivion. Natural
ecosystems have been reduced to a few isolated pockets. Despite this, they still possess or
support various food chains within the system and, in turn, are inter-linked with various other
adjoining systems. On the other hand, man-made ecosystems predominantly occupy the
landscape of the project area. The extensive agricultural fields spread across the area. Food and
fodder security being the major concerns, the system is intensively manipulated as well as
managed by the individual owners.
There exists a general spatial, functional, temporal and complex interdependence among these
ecosystems. Most of the protected plots (Protected & Managed Grassland Ecosystems) is found in
the upper ridges of the hill ranges, while other ecosystems like ponds/lakes/reservoirs (Lentic
Ecosystems), agricultural land, orchards (Cropland Ecosystems) occur in the low-lying flat lands or
valleys in the area. Though the forests are highly degraded, they provide such benefits to local
people as fuel wood, fodder, fruits, apart from ecological services like interception of surface run-
off, etc. thus, ensuring moisture conservation, ground water recharge, alleviation of soil cutting
&loss, minimizing siltation in reservoirs in the down-stream. As a cascading effect, the water
availability in streams, reservoirs and agricultural fields is enhanced and prolonged. Usually,
biological processes and activities in forest ecosystems are more complex, indicative of higher
level of successional ecological stage. Micro-organisms and microbial activities are found more in
the system, disintegrating and decomposing dead plant and animal and their parts, helping the
system recuperate with nutrients. During precipitation or storm, some of the nutrients reach the
valley area through the flowing water. Consequently, the fertility of the agricultural lands is
increased, which, in, turn, pushes up the agricultural land productivity.
Being a drought-prone area with poor average annual rainfall and scanty forest coverage, major
livelihood source of the people is rain-fed agriculture and animal husbandry. Major crops grown
are coarse grains like Bajra, Jowar, which are, in addition to, being hardy, less water demanding
and typical food-habits of desert land areas, very good fodder crops, especially their leaves and
succulent stems. But the bulk of fodder requirement is mostly fulfilled from Common grasslands.
There is, therefore, tremendous dependence on grazing land. Years of unregulated grazing have
adversely affected the grassland ecosystem. From sustainability point of view, these lands have
been brought to the brink of highly degraded wasteland.
Furthermore, water in reservoirs/ponds is mostly used for drinking purposes (human and livestock)
and irrigation for Rabi crop. So, there is, clearly, a symbiotic linkage among these systems.
Fauna
The primary consumers are the herbivores feeding on grasses comprising mainly of cow, buffalo,
sheep, hare, blue-buck, mouse, millipedes, centipedes, ants, grasshoppers, beetles, babbler,
crow, Bulbul, etc. Besides, secondary consumers are those who feed on herbivores. They are
jackal, fox, lizard, snakes, mongoose, etc. Hawks feed on small secondary consumers, thus
becoming the tertiary consumers. Decomposers active in decay of dead organic matter of different
life forms are fungi like Mucor, Aspergillus, Penicillium, Cladosporium, Rhizophus, Fusarium etc.,
and some bacteria and actinomycetes. They bring about the mineral back to the soil, thus making
them available to the producers.
4) Other Development Schemes in the project area
S.No Scheme Name of the department
Key interventions under the Scheme
Targeted Beneficiaries
Provisions under the Scheme
1 MGNREGA Gram Panchayat
Infrastructure, WHS 1968
2 Social Security
Gram Panchayat
Widow Pension , Old Age Pension etc. 750
Widow Pension , Old Age Pension etc.
3 Indira Awas Yojna
Gram Panchayat Awas Yojna BPL
5) Details of infrastructure in the project areas
Parameters Status (i) No. of villages connected to
the main road by an all-weather road
5
(ii) No. of villages provided with electricity
5
(iii) No. of households without access to drinking water
NIL
(iv) No. of educational institutions :
(P) 5
(S) 2
(HS) 1
(VI ) 0
Primary(P)/ Secondary(S)/ Higher Secondary(HS)/ vocational institution(VI)
(v) No. of villages with access to Primary Health Centre
2
(vi) No. of villages with access to Veterinary Dispensary
2
(vii) No. of villages with access to Post Office
2
(viii) No. of villages with access to Banks
5
(ix) No. of villages with access to Markets/ mandis
5
(x) No. of villages with access to Agro-industries
5
(xi) Total quantity of surplus milk 15782.4 lit/Day
(xii) No. of milk collection centres (U) 0
(S) 2
(PA) 0
(O) 0 (e.g. Union(U)/ Society(S)/
Private agency(PA)/ others (O))
(xiii) No. of villages with access to 3
Anganwadi Centre
(xiv) Any other facilities with no. of villages (please specify)
0
(xv) Nearest KVK 38 KM
(xvi) Cooperative society 2
(xvii) NGOs 0
(xviii) Credit institutions GSS -2
(i) Bank
(ii) Cooperative Society 2
(xix) Agro Service Centre's 1
6) Institutional arrangements (DWDU,PIA,WDT,WC)
PIA Particular
S.No Particulars Details of DWDU
1 PM ,WCDC Shri Mohan Dashora , Program Manager,
2 Address with contact no., website District Watershed Development Unit,
3 Telephone 02932221682
4 Fax ...............................
5 E-mail [email protected],
S.No Particulars Details of PIA
1. Name of PIA Foundation for Ecological Security-Sojat
2. Designation Snigdha Borah (SPO)
3. Address with contact no.,
website
Foundation for Ecological Security-Sojat
4. Telephone 9950772142
5. Fax ………….
6. E-mail [email protected]
WDT Particular
S.No Name of WDT
member M/F Age Qualification
Experience
in
watershed(
Yrs)
Description
of
professional
training
Role/
Function
1 Hardeep Singh
Rakhroy
M 27 Post Graduation
Diploma in Post
Graduation
1 yr SHG and
institutional
training
Social
Science
2 Ashok Singh M 25 Diploma in Civil
Engineering
2 yr - Engineer
3 Shri Girdhari lal
Verma
M 32 M.Sc
Agriculture
3 yr - Agriculture
4 - - - Animal
Husbandry
- - Convergence
WC Particulars
Upsamiti Jalgrahan Kharianiv IWMP-23 (11-12) Account no. 61181795255
Name
of the
District
Name
of the
project
Name of
WC
Date of
formation
of WC
Designation Name SC ST OBC Gen Landless User
Groups
SHG Qualification
PALI IWMP-
23
Upsamiti
Jalgrahan
Kharianiv
20/2/13 President Sri. Hariram/
Bholaram Patel Y 5th
SecretarY Gangaram/Ruparam
Dewasi Y
12th (Ret.
Teacher)
Daglaram/Annaram
Gujar Y Illiterate
Kesaram
Meghwal/lacharam Y 5
th
Kojaram Dewasi/
Bhakarram Dewasi Y Y Y Illiterate
Indraram/ Jagaram
Sargara Y Y 5
th
Nemma/ KhiYaram
Sirvi Y Y 8
th
Kanaram/ Gidaram
Sakia Y Y 5
th
Jeewan Singh/
Bharat Singh Rajput Y Y 5
th
Shankarlal/
Sujjaram Jaat Y Y 8
th
Samsudin/ Adam
Khan Teli Y Y 5
th
Unchai/ Ganeshram
Gujar Y Y Illiterate
Tulsi/ Bundaram
Meghwal Y Y Literate
Raziabanu/ Noor
Mohhamad teli Y Y Literate
Upsamiti Jalgrahan Rupawas IWMP- 23 (11-12) Account no. 61182912185
Name of the Distric
t
Name of the projec
t
Name of WC
Date of formation of WC
Designation
Name SC
ST
OBC
Gen
Landless
User Group
s SHG
Qualification
PALI IWMP-23
Upsamiti Jalgrahan Rupawas
10-02-2013
President Chunilal/Pukharam Ghachi
Y
Literate
SecretarY Pokaram/ Gommaram Kumhawat
Y
8th
Tikamram Meghwal/
Y 8
th
Tez Singh/ UdaY Singh Rajpurohit
Y Y 8
th
Goparam Dewasi/ Jevtaramm Dewasi
Y
Y 3rd
Sugam Singh/ Heer Singh Rajpurohit
Y
Y 8th
Ratan Singh/ Devi Singh Rajpurohit
Y Y 8
th
kiran Singh/labu Singh rajpurohit
Y
Y B.com
Sumer Singh/ Baktawar Singh
Y
Y 8th
Jassabai/ Durgaram Kumhawat
Y Y Illiterate
Manju Kawar/ Man Singh
Y Y 8
th
Latabai/ Ramesh Kumar Prajapat
Y Y 7
th
Jamuna Kawar/ Dungar Singh
Y Y
Y Illiterate
Punamdas/ Bhagwandas Veshnu
5th
Bundaram/ khetaram Meghwal
Y Y Y
Y Illiterate
Upsamiti Jalgrahan Mev (IWMP-23 (11-12) Account no. 61182912185
Name of the Distric
t
Name of the projec
t
Name of WC
Date of formation of WC
Designation
Name SC
ST
OBC
Gen
Landless
User Group
s SHG
Qualification
PALI IWMP-
23
Upsamiti Jalgraha
n Mev
26/11/12 President Bhundaram/ Prabhuram Renwal
Y
10th
SecretarY Manohar Singh/
Bhim Singh
Y
8th
Ranaram/ Sundar
ram Y
Y
literate
Sugri/ Babu Khan
Y Y
Illiterate
Biyaram s/o
Buddaram Y
Y
illiterate
Champalal/Pabu Ji
Patel
Y Y
8th
Devi Singh/Jawar Singh
Y
Y 10th
Govardhan/Baggara
m Dewasi Y
Y Y
8th
Rukma/Kaluram
Y
Y Y
illiterate
Geeta/Jagdish
Chowkidar Y
Y
illiterate
Prem Kawar/AbhaY
Singh
Y Y
literate
Polaram/Ramaram
kodalia
Y Y
8th
Omdas/ Kirpadas
Y Y
10th
Problem and Scope of improvement in the project area The socio economic conditions of the area can be improved through increased production which
can be achieved through expansion in cultivated area and productivity enhancement. 10 ha land is
arable wasteland and 10.8 ha is fallow can be brought under cultivation.
163.12 ha is only irrigated and with efforts this can be increased to 170 ha. The productivity gap of
major crops in the area as compared with district and with areas in the same agro climatic zones
indicate potential to increase the productivity. The demonstration of improved package of
practices, improved varieties, increased irrigation facilities and soil conservation measures under
the project can bridge this gap. Due to variation in the land holdings of the community in the area,
focus of the project would be on diversification in agriculture (horticulture, vegetables, green
houses, Agro forestry, fodder crops) and diversification in Livelihoods(Agriculture, Animal
husbandry, self employment)
16479.55 Quintal fodder scarcity can be met out through Pasture development .Improved animal
Husbandry practices can increase the productivity of livestock. 319 no of persons migrate due to
lack of employment and this migration can be checked through creation of employment
opportunities in the project area through increase in production and diversification in agriculture
and Livelihoods as mentioned above.
The IWMP Sojat watershed is located in the Sojat Tehsil of Pali district. The project team has
done a thorough analysis of the project area based on secondary and primary data. Some studies
have also been undertaken to understand the geo-hydrology and ecology of the area. Efforts have
been to map the community needs to help the communities in planning interventions in the
villages. The secondary data and the topographical survey of the area suggest that the overall
topography of the watershed area is undulating with the majority of the area having a slope of 0-
3%. The total geographical area of the watershed is 4650 Ha of which 66 % area is under
agriculture. But the agriculture is largely rainfed with only 4 % under irrigation.
The farmers depend mainly on the open wells and tube wells for irrigation. The secondary data
suggest that only 33 % of the people fall under the literate category. The total numbers of
household in the region are 1476 with a total population of 5464. The Schedule caste and
Schedule tribes form a significant portion of the overall population with 20 % belonging to these
categories. The total livestock population is around 6035 which have a large population of cows
which is nearly 20 %of the total population while the small ruminants constitute 49 % of the total
livestock population. The household survey helped in developing a better understanding of the
villages and helped in preparing plans for the area. The survey could through light on some of the
finer aspects of village life in the region. Looking at the overall income follows of the area nearly 18
% of income comes from animal husbandry sector while the most prominent is the agriculture
which occupies nearly 62 % of the total income. The total contribution of wage employment in
terms of MGNREGA, Wage employment in other place and migration, total to around 20 % which
indicate that the agriculture though being significant in terms of the geographical spread does not
account in a proportionate manner when it comes of income.
Nearly 24% of the households in the area are land less, while 76 % of the household come under
the small, medium and marginal category. Only 28 % of the farmers are large farmers. One of the
most characteristic features of the area is 13 % of the household are below poverty line. 8.6 % of
the households are forced to migrate in search of better income generation opportunities.
Constraints in agriculture practice are as follows:
Natural Constraints
· Rainfall is highly inadequate and aberrant in nature.
· 61 per cent area lies in arid and semi-arid tracts, where soils are having
poor fertility, low water holding capacity, high infiltration rate and shallow
in depth in some areas.
· More than a million hectare area is under problematic soils (saline and
alkaline).
· Due to scarcity of rainfall there is limited availability of ground water.
· The crops suffer due to high temperatures and wind velocity. Research Constraints
· Lack of suitable drought resistant, short duration, high yielding varieties of
· cereals, pulses and guar in kharif season
· Research support for development of drought resistant and photo
· insensitive varieties
· Limited expertise available for research in agro-forestry, horticulture and
· fodder crops
· Limited knowledge and literature available for post harvest management
· activities for the crops
· Negligible research facility in bio-technology including tissue culture
· Little information on cropping system based agriculture for different agro
· climatic conditions
· No research in organic farming
· Package of practices for integrated pest management not available for
· many crops
· The research on efficient use of water saving devices like sprinklers, drip
· irrigation lacking
· Lack of effective strategy for management of problematic soils
During the survey and village meeting the kind of needs expressed by the village communities are
as follows:
Capacity building needs:
Capacity building needs is generated in consonance with the kind of occupation the people of the
area have. Largely demands have been to build the capacities under agriculture, AH, Dairying,
Land development. However some of the people have also demanded for off farm livelihood
training such as stitching and kasida kari.
I) Programmatic Interventions:
To supplement the above, it was found that Awareness building programs, Institutional
strengthening trainings, Exposure visits will be the tools to capacitate and sensitize the community
on various programs and policies.
2) Land based physical intervention:
A large percentage of the people nearly 700 households have come up with demands for farm
bunds and farm ponds. In addition there are demands for soil and water conservation activities on
commons lands.
3) Agriculture and Agro culture based intervention:
People in the area have expressed their interest in improving the agro culture of the area with
advance agronomic practices. There have been cases where people have demanded for new
varieties being introduced in the area by means of crop demonstration. The area has a scarcity of
water thereby making people realize the importance of water. People have demanded for support
in improving the water transport and irrigation systems in the villages by usage of pipes and water
efficiency devises. Livestock which is also significant for the area in terms of livelihood support has
also been a focus of the people who have demanded for breed improvement, fodder improvement,
AI, livestock insurance. Based on these ground data following issues have been identified as key
intervention area for the region. These are:
Land development including farm lands.
Water harvesting to enhance availability for water.
Livelihood enhancement.
Skill enhancement.
Land development:
Arable lands:
As part of the arable land treatment work activities such as farm bund and farm pond have been
planned for the in-into conservation of water. These would enhance the soil moisture in the farm
lands and will support critical irrigation during situation of failure in monsoon during critical growth
periods. In addition neem plantation is being promoted in the farm lands to augment the fodder
needs of the area as well as enhancing the biomass availability in the region.
Common land:
Pasture lands will be developed to enhance the availability of fodder for the large livestock
population of the area. This would also mean talking up plantations of fodder trees on these
pastures which would also suffice to the needs of the small ruminants which is nearly 50% of the
livestock population. Efforts would be undertaken for the in-situ conservation of soil in the village
commons by digging of contour trenches.
Water Harvesting:
The area is having acute water scarcity. Therefore there is an urgent need to harvest water above
ground and facilitate recharge of shallow wells to solve the problem of drinking and irrigation
water. For this a large proportion of the budget has been kept for the purpose of creation of
masonry dams and earthen water harvesting structures. Provision has also been made to prevent
siltation of these structures by construction of loose boulder check dams on the drainages leading
to these structures.
Production Enhancement and Livelihood activities for Asset less person:
The livelihood enhancement program is directed towards farm based intervention. Efforts on one
hand are to reduce the cost of intervention for farmers, improve the productivity and increase the
income both by market linkages and improved usage of bi-products.
These are all attempts to promote on farm production of quality manure so that the agriculture
shifts form inorganic to organic agriculture. There was a demand for diversifying agriculture by
promoting dry land horticulture. Efforts will be made to promote agroforestry by plantation of
karunda and aloevera 25 ha of land. These plantations will be supported by water efficiency
measures such as drip with horticulture. The area also reflects physical deficiencies which are also
subject to poor drinking water and lack of nutrition. Therefore 19 ha vegetable kit will be provided
for increasing the intake of green leafy vegetable in the regular diet of the people.
As a departure from the normal thinking of Biogas as a energy saving device the project also uses
this as an option to add value to the cow dung by generating valuable energy, improved manure
and also would contribute towards reducing methane emissions.
To support the livestock based livelihoods there has been a demand for breed improvement. The
project plans to work on these aspects on three fonts:
Improving the herd by providing improved breeds of cows, buffalos and goats.
By Artificial insemination.
Breed improvement by providing natural service bull/buck.
In addition the project will be promoting integrated livestock and dairy based enterprises with
people who have shown a strong inclination towards livestock management. To promote energy
conservation bio gas plants and solar light have been proposed as demonstration. These will be
given across different caste and class groups to facilitate in scaling up of these initiatives.
Further, as we know about the nomadic pastoralists whose livelihood is depended on livestock
management This means that their livelihoods and the survival of their particular breeds are based
on access to forests, gauchar (village communal grazing lands) and oran (sacred groves attached
to temples). Thus in this regard through the discussion with the community we learned that the
breed of the livestock is needed to be improved as the benefit earned by the community from
sheeps and goats is less. Through need analysis they are in need of good breed through which
the cost of the products like wool will give them good return. On the other hand through meetings it
was learned that the traditional practices in managing the common lands should be revived as the
affinity towards common land is high for them.
Skill enhancement:
The skill enhancement proposed is based on the needs to enhance the income levels in different
groups to support the households. These groups are:
Women and differentially abled group:
Activities such as tailoring and Kasida kari. People have expressed needs to learn tailoring and
Kasida kari as an activity that they can pursue during their free period and can earn some money
to support their financial needs. The facilities for such training are also available in Pali and nearby
district. Moreover SHG groups would be facilitated both existing and new and support them in
improving the livelihood. Revolving fund and seed money would be given to SHG and facilitate in
taking up income generating activities like chakki machine, agri implements like thresher which
could be lended to farmers, for threshing purpose.
Baseline survey format for IWMP MIS website Project name: Pali IWMP 23/11-12
Total Geographical area of project: 0.0465Lakh-Ha
Treatable area Wasteland (lakh Hectares)
0.0064959 Rain fed Agricultural Land ( Lakh-Ha)
0.03099
Total Cropped Area (lakh Hectares)
0.03099 Net sown area (Lakhs Hectares)
0.03099
Total No of water Storage Structure
26 Total no of water extracting units
347
Total Storage Capacity of water storage structure in cubic meters
62300
Source of Data: WAPCOS limited and Primary data
Number of house hold
SC 208 ST 0
Others 1268 No of house hold
of landless people
275
Total population
of the project area
5464 No of marginal
farmers house
hold
252
Total no of BPL
House hold
149 - -
No of person –
Day of seasonal
migration
4-6 month - -
Source of data: Primary data and secondary
Depth of Ground water (Mts.) below ground level
Pre- monsoon 22 Post monsoon 14
No of person –
Day of seasonal
migration
4-6 month No of person –
Day of seasonal
migration
1-1.5 month
CHAPTER II
Chapter II
Socio economic features
The project area consists of a total population of 5464 with a sex ratio of 931 which is much higher
than that of state. The area has a low level of literacy of 33 % as compared to 60% at the state
level. As per the baseline survey conducted in the 5 revenue villages of the project area, there are
1476 households with a total population of 5464. Some of the predominant communities inhabiting
the area include Rajputs, Dewasi, Kumawat, Kumhar, Brahmins, Bhatti etc. As high as 86% of the
households belong to Other Backward Classes & others, while 14 % of the households hail from
communities categorized as Scheduled Caste. 149 no of households are BPL ( 10 % households
) 275 are landless households( 18.63 % households) and 409 household are small and marginal
farmers (27.7 %household)
Table 2.1 Population and Household Details
Source: Baseline Survey
Household Details
Village BPL
household L.
Less Small
Farmer M.
Farmer Total
household SC
household ST household
Kharianeev 64 135 51 80 470 74 0 Butealao 27 35 14 35 300 45 0 Rupawas 41 73 50 60 400 39 0 Lundawas 7 7 32 65 150 17 0 Chamdiyak 10 25 10 12 156 33 0
Total 149 275 157 252 1476 208 0 Source: Baseline survey and BPL state 2002 list through internet
Table 2.2 Development Indicators
S. No. Development Indicators State Project Area
1 Per capita income (Rs.) 16260 13074
2 Poverty ratio 24.8 24
Total Population
Village Male Female Total SC ST
Kharianeev 1043 1002 2045 422 0
Butealao 516 441 957 252 0
Rupawas 716 624 1340 195 0
Lundawas 324 300 624 87 0
Chamdiyak 258 240 498 162 0
Total 2935 2511 5464 1118 0
3 Literacy (%) 67.06 63.23
4 Sex Ratio 926 987
5 Infant mortality rate 52 55
6 Maternal mortality ratio 318 322
Source: Internet Census of India and statics of Rajasthan Table 2.3 Land use
Net Available area :- 4736.17 ha as per WAPCOS
SNo Village Gram Panchayat Area
1 Chamdiyak Kharianeev 676.75
2 Butealao Meo 1001.67
3 Kharianeev Kharianeev 1215.57
4 Rupawas Rupawas 1805.49
5 Lundawas Rupawas 36.69
Total 4736.17
Land Use Total area in Ha.
Private Panchayat
Government
Community
Total
Agriculture Land
Temporary fallow
Permanent Fallow 94.83 94.83
Cultivated Rainfed
3099.22 3099.22
Cultivated irrigated
163.12 163.12
Net Sown Area 3099.22 3099.22
Net Area sown more than once
443.71 443.71
Forest Land
Waste Land 649.59 649.59
Pastures 893.41 893.41
Area not available for treatment (settlement and road)
91.69 91.69
Total 3194.05 893.41 649.59 91.69 4645.36
Source: WAPCOS
The total area under the watershed is 4650 ha out of which 3099.22 Ha is under agriculture. As
per the revenue records of these five villages, 275 ha of land is
irrigated while the remaining is rainfed which means nearly
10% of the area has the potential of being brought under
irrigated farming. But depleting ground water has reduced the
availability of water for irrigation. Around 19 % of the total
land area has been categorized as pasture land. However, the
availability of pasture land across the project villages varies
significantly with villages like Lundawas has no land classified
as village pasture.
66 % area is single cropped area and 9.5 % is double
cropped. The main source of irrigation is private well and
tube well. The average annual rainfall (5 years) in the area
is 250 mm. The Major streams in the Watershed are Sukhri.
Nearly 2% of the land in the area is current fallow. 13.97%
and 19.21% of land is scrub and without scrub. 7.1% of land
is barren and rocky. There are mainly 10 types of land
use/land cover which have been identified from the Land
Sat Imageries.
Pasture development: The land used table shows that table there is 893.41 Ha pasture land
(19%) This emphasizes need for taking a pasture land development work through sowing of
promising species of grasses of plantation
2.4 Agriculture status and Productivity Gap Analysis Agriculture and animal husbandry are the two major source of livelihood options in the area.
Drought in every three years is very prominent with average rainfall of 200-250 mm. 62% of the
income is derived from farming where mehendi cultivation is a very prominent cash crop in the
area. Sojat is also known as ―Mehendi city‖. Rs1200-1500/workforce is earned by the workforce
during weeding and harvesting season. and the people have to resort to other options for
sustaining their families.
Agriculture
Land and water resources have been the key drivers of farm based production systems which
form the predominant source of livelihoods of the people in this area. The area is characterized by
land based economy. Land has also been crucial in defining the social and political relations of the
people in the area.
Source PRA and FGD
18%
82%
Agriculture Arable and Non-arable land Status
Arable Land
16.2%
22.76%
40.3%
20.7%
Farmer Type
Small Marginal
Big Landless families
The above chart and data has been derived from the baseline survey conducted in the five
villages.
Through the base line survey it was found that 20.7% of the
population are landless, 40.3% are big farmers, 16.2 % are small
and 22.76% marginal farmers.
The above chart enumerates the status of agriculture land in the area where 82% of the
landholding is non arable and 18% is arable. This gives a picture of acute shortage of water for
irrigation thereby limiting the farmers to practice single cropping.
The area is mostly sandy loam where the percolation of water is good. Most of the soil is
calcareous while in some patches, saline and alkaline soil is also found. The soil is moderately to
severely eroded mainly by rivers and nallahs. Substitution of organic fertilizer with chemical
fertilizer has further worsened the soil quality. The nature of agriculture and farming practices is
also strongly conditioned by the availability of water. The source of irrigation is poor as most of the
wells have dried out and this has led to extraction of ground water through tube wells which is a
serious ecological concern. On the other hand the water of tube well is saline and fluoride
Farmer type Total %
Small 215 16.2
Marginal 302 22.76
Big 535 40.3
Landless families 275 20.7
Total 1327 100
Agriculture Arable and Non-arable status
%
Arable Land 18.03
Non-Arable 81.97
Total 100
Source baseline survey data
contaminated which again it becomes difficult for the farmers to irrigate the land. There is no water
canal in the area which ultimately the cropping is rainfed.
Scanty and erratic rainfall and sandy loam soil has limited the farming options to bajra, mehendi,
moong, moth, sonamukhi, till etc. Mehendi is cultivated as cash crops which gives good return to
the farmer.
Kharif is the main cropping season in the area. Major cereals grown during Kharif include maize,
bajra and jowar. Crop production during Rabi remains limited to such farmlands which have
access to irrigation. Wheat is the main cereal crop grown during Rabi. Besides cereal crops,
pulses, fodder crops like rajka and mustard are also cultivated in the area. Besides the traditional
plough, tractors are also being increasingly used.
Mehendi is widely cultivated in the area and gives good returns to the farmer. It is observed that
for years the crop is undisturbed and harvested one to two times a year. It is found that the
workforce rate reaches to nearly Rs 1500/- during weeding and harvesting season. Excess rainfall
is harmfull for the crop. The crop grows well in well drained soil. Sandy loam soil is preferably
suitable for the crop. There is a good number of mehendi factories in the area. The harvested crop
is dried and grinded to powder, packed and exported to different parts of the country. Mehendi has
a lot of medicinal value and is widely prefered for natural dye for hair and traditionally used as
making designs on palms during festival and marriage.
Over the years with increase demand of mehendi for its medicinal values and good return has also
decreased the quality of the product as people have started adulterating the product and selling
them in the market. More over with the increase of demand and increase in the number of small
and large merchants the competition has also increased thereby cheap methods of marketing and
adulterated product has increased.
During the base line survey it was found that the mehendi crop harvested in the year 2012 the
farmers faced heavy loss as the crop failed due to rainfall. Moreover it was found that the crop is
infested by Semiluper pest in cloudy conditions which eats up the leaves and stems of Mehendi.
More over in few of the region; farmers have also stopped cultivating mehendi.
Besides mehendi, farmers also cultivate Sonamukhi which is an another cash crop, has medicinal
value for stomach ailments. Sonamukhi also gives good returns to the farmer and is a rabi crop.
Further, it has been observed that the soil is highly infected by termites in the project area, which
makes it necessity to introduce termite treatment in the livelihood and production intervention.
2.4.a Agriculture and Horticulture Status and Fuel availability
1 2 3 4 5 6 Sl no
Season
Crop sown Variety Rain fed Irrigated Total
Area(ha)
Production (Ton)
Productivity (kg/ha)
Area (ha)
Production (Ton)
Productivity (kg/ha)
Area (ha)
Production (Ton)
1 Kharif Jowar Desi(lil Jowar)
751 901 833 751 901
Bajra HHB 67 554 886.4 625 554 886.4
Urd Local 15 - - 15 -
Til G4 625 250 2500 625 250
Moong G4, K851,FML668
130 65 2000 130 65
Gawer RGC-936
325 260 1250 325 260
Mehendi Murali 1518 1138.5 1333 1518 1138.5
2 Rabi Mustard Pusa bold, vasundhra, bio 902,pusa jai kisan
Jeera Rz 19, g4
177 106.2 1666 18 106.2
Methi Rmt 1, rmt 143,
Wheat Rj 1482, raj 3077,
125 250 500 30 250
3 Zaid - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - --
Total
2.4.b Abstract of Cropped Area (Ha)
Area under single crop
3099.22 Ha
Area under double crop 163.12 Ha
Area under multiple crop 0
Source: Wapcos Data Crop Rotation Bajra - Fallow Moong - Mustard Moong - Fallow Jowar - Fallow Til - Fallow Gowar - Wheat
Mehendi - Mehendi
Rajka - Rajka
Urad - Fallow
Bajra - Wheat
Crop rotation is a healthy process to maintain the health of the soil and increase productivity. It is
found that in the project area the farmers practice crop rotation but that is also limited to availability
of water for irrigation. Thus, erratic rainfall, improper irrigation methods, exploitation of ground
water has decreased the cultivation area to fallow land over the period of time. Thus this gives a
scope to intervene in the region with soil water conservation activities, crop demonstration and
crop diversification techniques to shift single cropping to double and multiple cropping.
2.4.c Productivity Gap Analysis Analysis of the below chart indicate that besides national gap there is wide gap in
productivity within state and even within same agro climatic zones.
Name Of Crops
India Kg / Ha
Highest Average in Rajasthan
Kg / Ha
Highest Average of
Agro climatic zone Kg / Ha
District Average Kg
/ Ha
Project Area Average Kg
/ Ha
Jowar 730 1634 511 1799 1580
Urd 650 620 400 310 300
Til 585 663 300 280 250
Moong 710 699 350 450 430
Gawar 680 1400 2150 2050 1950
Bajra 930 400 785 540 500
Wheat 2802 3422 2012 1789 1725
Mustard 1001 1619 1176 1290 1198
Source of data: Secondary data (Policies Rajasthan Govt and demand and supply of
fodder etc pdf)
The productivity gap and reasons of it indicate potential to increase the productivity through crop
demonstration. Crop demonstrations would be carried out on improved crops/ varieties, improved
agronomic practices. IPNM, Mixed cropping, distribution of fodder seed mini kit. Demonstration of
improved methods and economics of fodder crops cultivation and also distribution foundation
seeds of Forage Crops for further multiplication, introduction of fodder crops in the existing crop
rotations.
Analysis of the above table indicate that besides national gap there is wide gap in productivity
within state and even within same agro climatic zones.
The reasons for this variation are
The farmers uses varieties HHB67 of Bajra and the recommended varieties like HHB- 67,
HHB- 68 & RHB- 121 to provide high yield.
The farmers uses G4, K851,FML668 of Moong and the recommended variety is K 851.
Methyl Parision Powder at the rate of Rs 20/kg and Mono Crotophost at the rate of Rs
350-400/kg are used for the for the better productivity and quality. Moong seed is
purchased at the rate of Rs 70-80/kg.
The farmers uses RGC-936 variety of Gawar and the recommended variety is G4.
The productivity gap and reasons of it indicate potential to increase the productivity through crop
demonstration .Crop demonstrations would be carried out on improved crops/ varieties, improved
agronomic practices. INM, IPM, Mixed cropping, distribution of fodder seed mini kit. Demonstration
of improved methods and economics of fodder crops cultivation and also distribution foundation
seeds of Forage Crops for further multiplication, introduction of fodder crops in the existing crop
rotations.
Table 2.5 Existing area under Horticulture/Vegetable/Floriculture (ha)
Activity Area Species Varieties Recommended varieties Production
Medicinal Plants
Mehendi 1265.52 Murli Bush Murli 1000
Sonamukhi 253.1 Augustia Herb
Bajra 554 HHB 67 HHB67, HHB 68, RHB 121
1600
Jowar 751 Local 1200
Wheat 250 RAJ 1482, RAJ 3077
RAJ 3077 2000
Moong 130 G4, K851,FML668
K 851 500
Table 2.6 Land holding pattern in project area
Type of Farmer
Total Households
Land holding (ha) irrigation source wise
Land holding (ha)Social group wise
Irrigated (source)
Rain fed
Total General SC ST OBC BPL
(i)Large farmer
535 209.44 278.24 487.68 973.28 52.96 No 520.32
(ii) Small farmer
215 403.2 162.88 566.08 36.48 42.88 NO 121.92
(iii) Marginal farmer
302 28.8 130.88 159.68 17.92 38.24 NO 72.32
(iv) Landless person
275 0 0 0 NO NO NO NO
(V)No. of BPL households
149 NO NO NO NO NO NO NO 98.32
Total 1476 641.44 572 1213.44 1027.68 134.08 NO 714.56 98.32
40 % land holdings belong to small and marginal farmers who own 60 % of total cultivated area.
Horticulture/vegetables could be more economical to Small and marginal farmers with irrigation
source. For large farmers with no irrigation facility Horticulture/vegetables will be promoted in a
part of land with farm pond construction.
The following activities will be more beneficial for small land holdings and for diversification and
income for large farmers
Horticulture plantation, Medicinal and Aromatic Crops, floriculture: As discussed
earlier. Horticulture/vegetables/medicinal could be more economical to Small and
marginal farmers with irrigation source. Also the project area has good potential for
medicinal & aromatic crops like Karunda, Aloevera etc.
Agro forestry plantation: To increase the income of farmers and also for shelter belt
plantation as wind velocity is high in the project area.
Production and distribution of quality seed – There is need to ensure that good quality
seed is available for cultivators for which adequate seed production would be initiated in
watershed areas with the assistance of private sector and agriculture department
technologies
Construction of farm pond to meet critical irrigation as the area is rainfed with erratic
rainfall.
Establishment of nurseries: Most of the planting material is procured from other parts of
the State/ country. The procurement of planting material from distant places causes
damage to the planting material and often results in untimely supply. Hence nursery
development activity in area.
Drip irrigation Drip irrigation will be promoted in all horticulture plantations, vegetables
and in nurseries for rational use of irrigation higher yields and quality produce.
Kitchen Garden To meet the nutritional gap of women and children demo plots for small
and marginal would be taken.
2.7 Livestock status animals/ milk production /average yield
Sl n0
Description of animals
Population in No.
Yield(milk/mutton/Wool)
Equ. cow units
Dry matter requirement per year in kg .(7Kg per animal.)
Total requirement in M.T.
1 Cow Indigenous
1155 6-8 kg/day 2951025 2951
2 Cow Hybrid 90 9-12 kg/day
3 Buffaloes 800 8 kg/day 2044000 2044
4 Goat 1550 1.5 kg/day 775 1980125 1980
5 Sheep 1365 682 1742510 1742.5
6 Camel 69 2 kg/day 176295 176.2
7 Poultry 1000
8 Pigs 6
Total 6035 3493 8893955 8893.955
19% 1%
13%
26%
23%
1%17%
0% Livestock Status
Cow Indigenous Cow Hybrid
Buffaloes Goat
Sheep Camel
Poultry Pigs
Source: Baseline survey and animal census
Animal husbandry is the other option of livelihood which is prominent amongst the pastoral
community, who rears herds of goats, sheep and camels. The other community too rears cows
and buffalo for milk and milk products. Low levels of literacy, absence of programmes for
developing skills particularly in the non-farm sector and limited access to basic infrastructural
facilities and services has impinged on the people‘s right to choose the best livelihood option.
Agriculture supplemented with livestock keeping forms the basis of sustenance for the farmers in
this area. Crop residue and grazing provides fodder and forage to livestock. Livestock keeping on
the other hand acts as a drought power and source of energy, nutrition and manure. The symbiotic
relation between the two systems is clearly visible and change in one has a direct impact on the
other. The livestock composition shows that smaller ruminants are more than the larger ruminants.
Degradation of common grazing lands and frequent occurrences of drought in the recent years
has raised serious questions pertaining to fodder security in the area. Loss of vegetative cover as
a result of high degrees of soil erosion and overgrazing has adversely affected the productivity of
these common grazing lands. Changes in the cropping pattern along with the substitution of
organic fertilizer with chemical fertilizer reduced the fertility of the soil as well as the quality of
fodder available from crop residue. Further, frequent occurrences of drought leading to crop failure
also affected the fodder availability from crop residue which has increased the pressure on the
already overexploited common grazing land. The factors mentioned above have not only led to a
decline in the productivity of the livestock but have also increased instances of distress sale of
livestock.
In spite of the large number of livestock, production is less hence increase in productivity across all
species, is a major challenge. To reduce production of unproductive cattle and improve the
productivity by improving the breeds by breeding management following activities will be taken up
Artificial insemination
Distribution of superior Breeding bulls for use in Cattle and Buffalo
Distribution of goats and sheeps
Besides breed improvement other animal husbandry
practices like better health, hygiene and feeding practices
can increase productivity of livestock. Hence Activities
like Animal health camps, demonstration of improved
methods of conservation and utilization of Forage crops
are proposed.
Table 2.8 Existing area under Fodder (ha)
S.No Item Unit Area/Quantity 1 Existing Cultivable area under Ha 1161
Fodder
2 Production of Green fodder Tonns/year 3956
3 Production of Dry fodder Tonns/ Year 3290.4
4 Area under Pastures Ha 828
5 Production of fodder Tonns/year 7246
6 Existing area under Fuel wood Ha 828
7 Supplementary feed Kgs/ day -
8 Silage Pits No -
9 Availability of fodder quintals 72460
10 Deficiency/excess of fodder
quintals 16479.5
The table above shows there is fodder deficiency and there is requirement of 1647.955 MT/Year
and availability 7246 MT/Year. To minimize the large and expanding gap between feed and
fodder resource availability and demand there is a need to develop common land through soil
water conservation activities, grass seeding, and plantation and introduce fodder demo plots to
meet fodder demand during lean season.
Increase in 5% productivity of fodder crop. Development of 433 ha pastureland.
Table 2.9 Agriculture Implements
From the above data we can understand that the impact of mechanization is slow in the area,
community still practices indigenous methods for cultivation. This also depicts that since the
majority of the farmers are small and marginal with small landholdings and poor return from crop
production limits the purchasing parity of agricultural assets of the farmers. So, SHGs would be
promoted to buy farm implements and rent to farmer to meet agriculture needs.
Table 2.10 NREGS: No of card holder, activities taken so far, employment status
Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (Mahatma Gandhi NREGA) aims at
enhancing livelihood security of households in rural areas of the country by providing minimum
hundred days of guaranteed wage employment in a financial year. In this occasion, the scenario of
the program in the project area shows that 98% of the households has job card and the works
undertaken in the area is on water-harvesting structures and road connectivity.
S. No Implements Nos.
1 Tractor 191
2 Sprayers-manual/ power 0
3 Cultivators/Harrows 6
4 Seed drill 0
5 Any Other 59
050
100150200250
249
10
77
0
80
Migration
Migration
Sl No Name Of Villages
Total No Of Job Card
Employment Status
Activity Taken
1 Kharianeev 771
98 % Job Card Holder
Get Employment
Road & Earthen WHS
2 Butealao 1073
3 Chamdiyak 185
4 Lundawas 267
5 Rupawas 380
Total 1968
Source: Internet MGNREGA site 2.11 Migration details Migration to nearby town and cities is a common phenomenon in the area especially for the
village‘s lieing close to towns and cities where the source of livelihood is diverse with varied
opportunity. One of the main reasons for migration in the project area is lack of employment which
has compelled the youth to migrate in search of employment. In the below chart we find that
villages like are few of the villages where the migration rate is high. Moreover, due to poor income
from agriculture as a result of rainfed agriculture and lucrative livelihood options in nearby cities
and town is another reason for migration in the area.
Table 2.11
Name of village
No. of persons
migrating
No. of days per year of
migration
Major reason(s) for
migrating
Distance of destination
of migration from the
village (km)
Occupation during
migration
Income from such occupation
(Rs. in lakh)
Kharianeev 152 90-240 days
Un-employment
and Livestock Management
Near by city like Pali, Jodhpur,
nearby states like Gujrat, Mumbai
Wage labour work, livestock management,
other employment
works
0.25-0.5
Lundawas 10 90 days
Butealao 80 90 days
Chamdiyak 0
Rupawas 77 90 days
Migration can be seen as a prominent
phenomenon with nearly 13% of the
income coming from migration. MGNERGA
has contributed to about 5% of the income
by generating unskilled employment in the
area. The migration can be checked by
creation of employment opportunities,
enhancing farm level economy, increases
the income of the people engaged in animal
husbandry by dairy and diversification in
livelihood.
2.12) Livelihood Details
Table2.12 (a)Major activities (On Farm)
Name of activity No of House holds Average annual income
Cultivators 744 30000-80000
Dairying 850 8000-15000
Poultry 0 0
Piggery 0 0
Landless Agri. Labourers 275 10000-25000
Table2.12 (b)Major activities (Off Farm)
Name of activity Households/individuals Average annual income from
the Artisans 10 25000-45000
Carpenter 5 60000-80000
Blacksmith 4 12000-20000
Leather Craft 3 7000-15000
Porter 19 8000-25000
Mason 25 40000-65000
Others specify (Cycle Repair ,STD,Craft etc)
12 20000-30000
Source of data: Household data
2.13 Existing SHG
S.No Name of SHG Members Activity involved Monthly
Collection
Monthly
income
Fund
available
Loan
Taken
Assistance
available
Source of
assistance
Training
received
1 Vijay laxmi Self
Help Group
10 No production
activity
50 -
142000
- - No training
received
2 Jay Jog Maya 10 No production
activity
50 -
-
- - No training
received
3 Bankya
Maharana
11 No production
activity
50 -
110,000
Marudhra
Gramin Bank
Marudhra
Gramin Bank
No training
received
4 Roop Nath Ji 10 No production
activity
50
1500
-
-
- - No training
received
5 Jay Ambe 10 No production
activity
50
7000
- - No training
received
6 Maharana
Pratap
10 No production
activity
50
-
14500
0
Marudhra
Gramin Bank
Marudhra
Gramin
bank
No training
received
The above table indicates that concept and practice of SHG is not very strong in the project area.
This influenced by certain factors like good earning from Mehendi cultivation, socio and economic
factors like dominant community like Rajput women do not prefer to come out of their houses,
migration, lack of awareness on savings, alcoholism hinders in night meetings of women. Thus
gives us scope in creating mass awareness amongst women and provide financial assistance for
the marginal and BPL families to meet their basic ends.
2.14 Ground Water details
S.No Source No. Functional depth
Dry Area irrigated
Water availability(days)
i) Dug wells 247 80-100 39 250-300 ha 120 days
ii) Shallow tube wells
20 150 20 Nil 250 days
iii) Pumping sets 9 80 4 100 200 days
iv) Deep Tube Wells 71 350-400 60 150 ha 270 ys
2.15) Availability of Drinking Water Status
S.No
Name of the village
Drinking water requirement Ltrs/day
Present availability of drinking water Ltrs/day
No. of drinking water sources available
No. functional
No. requires repairs
No. defunct
1 Chamadiya
k 8700 5800 6 2 1 3
2 Kharianiv 32652 21768 5 1 0 4
3 Lundawas 9276 6184 7 1 0 6
4 Rupawas 24060 16040 7 6 1 0
5 Butelao 15936 10624 8 1 0 7
Total 90624 60416 31 11 0 20
Baseline survey
2.16 Water use efficiency
Name of major crop
Area (Hectare)
through water saving
devices(Drip/Sprinklers)
through water conserving agronomic practices
#
Any other (pl. specify)
Total
Rabi/Kharif Non Non - 0
The table above indicate there is need for judicious use of available water to encourage optimum
use of water through installation of every operational wells.
We know that since ages the farmers practice flood irrigation which is an exploitation of ground
water. Even after decades the government has provided schemes on water efficiency techniques
yet the adaptation to such practice is poor.
2.17 Slope details:
Source: WAPCOS
From the above chart it shows that the area is both undulating and flat, which gives scope to work
on both water harvesting and soil water conservation activities. This would also give us a scope to
work on impact assessment later pertaining to the slope condition of the area.
Slope of Watershed
S.No. Slope percentage
Area in hectares
1 0 to 3% 4157
2 3 to 8% 284
3 8 to 25% 140
4 > 25% 69 4157
284
14069
Area in hectares
0 to 3%
3 to 8%
8 to 25%
> 25%
2.18) Water Budgeting
Good catchment- normally a funnel shaped catchment in hilly terrain with less vegetation.
Average catchment- catchment in a plains where there is no dense growth of vegetation.
Bad catchment: catchment with dense growth of vegetation and highly permeable top soil and
sub soil.
Total available runoff(cum) use Stranges table
Rainfall 414 mm
Sno
Micro watershed
no Macro/micro code Area in
ha Type of
catchment
Yield of Run Off
from the catchment (CUM/Ha)
Yield of Run Off from the catchment
(CUM)
1 20/2 0820000302415100 453.44 Bad Catchment 222 100663.7
2 20/3 0820000302415100 329.57 Bad Catchment 222 73164.54
3 20/3 0820000302415200 16.08 Bad Catchment 222 3569.76
4 20/4 0820000302415100 61.16 Bad Catchment 222 13577.52
5 20/4 0820000302415000 67.11 Bad Catchment 222 14898.42
6 20/5 0820000302415000 404.91 Bad Catchment 222 89890.02
7 20/5 0820000302414900 201.08 Bad Catchment 222 44639.76
8 20/6 0820000302415100 0.57 Bad Catchment 222 126.54
9 20/6 0820000302415200 30.11 Bad Catchment 222 6684.42
10 20/6 0820000302414900 303.77 Bad Catchment 222 67436.94
11 20/6 0820000302415000 163.35 Bad Catchment 222 36263.7
12 20/7b 0820000302415000 366.3 Bad Catchment 222 81318.6
13 20/7b 0820000302415200 630.56 Bad Catchment 222 139984.3
14 20/7b 0820000302415300 36.69 Bad Catchment 222 8145.18
15 20/7b 0820000302414900 1300.63 Bad Catchment 222 288739.9
16 20/7b 0820000302415100 100 Bad Catchment 222 22200
17 20/2 0820000302415100 114.98 Bad Catchment 222 25525.56
18 20/7 0820000302415100 100.23 Bad Catchment 222 22251.06
19 20/3 0820000302415100 17.19 Bad Catchment 222 3816.18
4697.73
1042896
Good Catchment : Land slope having above 20 % Average Catchment : Land slope having above 5 to 20 % Bad
Catchment : Land slope having less than 5 %
STRANGES TABLE
Existing structures
S.No. Name No. Storage Capacity
(cum)
i) WHS (earthen) 16 20000
ii) Khadin/ Talab 6 15000
iII) Anicut 4 20000
Total 26 55000
Runoff to be trapped in proposed structures:
S.No. Name No Ha Storage capacity in CUM
i) WHS (earthen) 2 800
iv) Farm Pond 8 3500
v) Anicut 4 3000
Total 14 2398 7300
Runoff trapped in existing & proposed structures = 55000 + 7300 = 62300 CUM
Runoff trapped = total runoff trapped X 100 / total available runoff = 5.9%.
Height of all the structures proposed is between 0.8 Metre to 2 metre. There is no structure
whose water impounding height is more than 2 metre.Land and water resources have been
the lifeline of farm based production systems. The health of land and water resources have
been one of the most crucial factors in determining the productivity of agriculture and animal
husbandry which supports the livelihoods of the people in the area. Continuous depletion
and degradation of land and water resources has directly impinged on the livelihoods of the
people. Thus, efforts have been to assess the needs of the people for different types of land
and water based interventions while preparing the DPR. As per the baseline survey and
PRA the livelihood needs of the people in the area have been depicted that the households
demanding any type of soil and moisture conservavtion activities, 40%H.H.-demanded for
farm bunding, 0 %H H of the households demanded for well deepening to meet the
irrigation requirement which is mainly through open wells. 2% of the households demanded
activities for water harvesting to conserve and augment the water resources of the area.
Soil Details
Soil of Sojat comes under the great soil group of Calciorthids having brown color in domination. It
ranges from brown to light pale brown & reddish color. On the basis of texture of soil, Sojat soil
can be classified in to sandy loam. In this type of soil, percolation of water is good to medium.
Most of the soils are calcareous in nature generally this calcareous layer is found between the 50
to 100 cm. Most of the part is saline with a few patches of alkaline. Organic carbon in the soil in
Sojat ranges from 0.22 to 0.33%. Nitrogen in surface layer is generally low across the
physiographic region in the area where as P2O5 and K2O is medium. In general N and P status of
intensively cultivated in plains and valleys is relatively low and K is high compared to hills and
pediments.
Soil depth
Soil Depth suggests the volume of soil from which roots can
acquire nutrient and water for their growth. In Sojat district
moderately shallow soil constitute 37.3%, moderately deep
to deep 27.2%, besides rock outcrops is 13.73 %.
Texture
It affects soil characteristics directly or indirectly and gives
an idea of soil water retention, availability of water to plants,
soil genesis, infiltration rate, and drainage and crop suitability class. Particle size class distribution
of soil of Sojat shows predominance of fine loamy to sandy soils (63.8%). Surface textural class
distribution in soils of Pali shows predominant sandy loam soils (46.8%) followed by sandy clay
loam to clay (36%). Sandy loam soil constitutes more than 50% in Aravali landscape and eastern
plain.
Soil Profile
S.No.
Major Soil Classes Area in hectares
1 Medium yellow to brown sandy loam soil
4650
Soil Depth :
B Depth (Cms.) Area in hectares
1 0.00 to 7.50 0
2 7.50 to 45.00 0
3 > 45.00 4650
Soil fertility Status Kg/ha Recommended
1 N 35-40 45-50
2 P 20-25 25-30
3 K 0 -
4 Micronutrients PPM
5 PH 7.7-8.3 Normal to alkaline
6 Conductivity 0.28-0.33 Normal salinity
Soil test report:
Soil sampling was done in five villages of the project area namely: Butealao, Chamdiyak,
Lundawas, Khariyaneev and Rupawas. It was found that Potassium content in kg/hectare found to
be comparatively much more than recommended value in all the soil taken from five villages. The
PH value of selected village, Khariya Neev, found 8.13 which is less than Lundawas (9.15) but is
more than normal recommended value (7.75). It indicates the alkaline nature of soil.
2.19) Soil erosion status Erosion details
Erosion status in project Area
Cause Type of erosion Area affected
(ha) Run off(mm/
year) Average soil loss
(Tonnes/ ha/ year)
Water erosion
a Sheet 2639.68
341.3 12
Source primary soil sampling
data
B Rill 633.75
341.3 11
C Gully 1376.57
341.3 6
Sub-Total 29
Wind erosion 0
Total for project 4650
Soil Erosion
Soil of Sojat is moderately to severely eroded mainly by rivers and nallahs, mostly during the rainy
months. Besides, stagnation of water has given rise to the problem of salinity and alkalinity.
The need is:
To check land degradation
To reduce excessive biotic pressure by containing the number and increase of live stock
To check cultivation on sloping lands without adequate precautions of soil and water
conservation methods.
To discourage cultivation along susceptible nala beds
To check Faulty agriculture techniques
To check uncontrolled grazing and developed cattle tracks
To check deforestation of steep slopes
(For delineated watershed projects)
To check erosion velocity of runoff, store Runoff, to arrest silt carried by runoff and to arrest silt
carried by runoff and to recharge Ground Water structures like Loose stone check Dams, Anicuts
would be taken up.
CHAPTER III
Chapter III
Proposed Development Plan
The activities are indicative addition/deletion in activities will be as per local conditions
A) Preparatory phase activities Capacity Building Trainings and EPA
The IEC activities like group meetings were carried out in all the habitations of 20/2, 20/3, 20/4,
20/5, 20/6 and 20/7b micro watershed. A series of meetings were conducted with GP members,
community and discussed about the implementation of IWMP program. Self help Group and User
groups were also formed.
Gram Sabha were conducted for approval of EPA (Village) and for selecting the watershed
committee.
S. No Name of the Gram
Panchayat
Date on which Gram
Sabha approved EPA
1 Meo 22/5/13
2 Rupawas 14/5/13
3 Kharianeev 15/5/13
SNo Name of
Village
Amount
earmark
ed for
EPA
EPA
planned
Estimate
d Cost
Expenditure incurred Balance Expected
outcome
Actual
Outcome
1 Kharianiv 825942 825942 825942 Solar light order has been installed
and rest EPA related documents
has been prepared
629742 Participation
will increase
Participation
will increase
2 Chamdiyak 380250 380250 380250 Solar light order has been installed
and rest EPA related documents
has been prepared
293050 Participation
will increase
Participation
will increase
3 Rupawas 986808 986808 986808 Solar light order has been installed
and rest EPA related documents
has been prepared
747008 Participation
will increase
Participation
will increase
4 Butealao 574986 574986 574986 Solar light order has been installed
and rest EPA related documents
has been prepared
444186 Participation
will increase
Participation
will increase
5 Lundawas 22014 21800 21800 Solar Light installation 214 Participation
will increase
Participation
will increase
The PRA exercise was carried out in all the villages on the dates shown below:
S. No Name of the village/Habitation Date on which PRA conducted
1 Butealao 9/10/12 to 12/9/12
2 Rupawas 29/1/13 to 2/2/13
3 Lundawas 6/12/12 to 7/12/12
4 Chamdiyak 23/9/12- 30/9/12
5 Kharianeev 13/12/12 to 16/12/12
Transect walk was carried out involving the community for social mapping, resource mapping,
detailed discussions and deliberations with all the primary stakeholders were carried out. Socio
economic survey was carried out during January 2nd
2013 to April 15th 2013 covering the
households and primary data on demography, land holdings employment status, community
activities as mentioned in chapter 2.
Table-, Education & Communication (IEC) activities in the project area (1% of total Project cost.)
1 2 3 4 5 6
S. No. Activity Executing agency Allocation out of 1% of total Project cost
Allocation in lacs Expected Outcome
(mayquantify, wherever
possible) I year II year III year IV year V year Total
1 ekWMy #QVkWi okVj gkjosZfVx LVªDplZ ¼iapk;r lfefr, jktho xkW/kh lsok dsUnz ;k vU; iapk;r lfefr Lrjh; utnhdh ljdkjh Hkou ½A
FES 0-20 0 0.84 0.28 0.28 0 1.40
2 tyxzg.k {ks= xfrfof/k;kas dks n’kkZrk gqvk POP /
CLAY / WOOD / PLASTIC ls cuk gqvk ekWMyA
FES
0-10
0
0.42
0.14
0.14
0
0.7
3 MhLiys cksMZs@IysxDlh cksMZ@
4 okWy isfUVax&tyxzg.k xfrfof/k;ksa] y{;ks o izkfIr vkfn dks n’kkZrh gqbZ A
FES 0-25 0 1.05 0.35 0.35 0 1.74
5 tyxzg.k fodkl laca/kh eqfnzr iEiysVl@fyQ ysVl@pkVZ@iksLVj@vkfnA
6 Ukkjk ys[ku
7 lQyrk dh dgkuh;ksa dh ohfM;ksaxzkQh@QksVksxzkQh@ y?kqfQYe ,oa d`"kdks ls lk{kjkrdkj @ okrkZ A
FES
0-15
0.63 0.21 0.21 0 1.05
8 fucU/k o okn&fookn izfr;ksfxrk
9 jsfM;ksa@nwjn’kZu ij okrkZ o foKkiu
10 lkaLd`frd R;kSgkj @ esys vkfn ds volj ij iznZ’kuh
0-10
11 uqDdM+ ukVd
FES 0 0.42 0.14 0.14 0 0.7
12 dViqryh izn’kZu
13 jkf= xks"Bh FES 0-20 0 0.48 0.76 0.16 0 1.39
14 Hkw laj{k.k lIrkg
15 psruk jSyh
16 tyxzg.k fodkl dk lans’k nsus okys lkaLd`frd dk;ZØe
17 d`"kd fnol dk vk;kstu ,oa {ks= Hkze.k fnol dk vk;kstu bR;kfn
18 dqy 1-00
State remote sensing application centre WAPCOS limited agency was assigned the work of
preparing various thematic layers using Cartosat-1 and LISS-3 imageries for Creation,
development and management of geo-spatial database depicting present conditions of land
(terrain), water and vegetation with respect to watershed under different ownerships at village level
Various thematic layers provided by WAPCOS are:
Delineation of Macro/Micro watershed boundaries.
Digitized Khasara maps of the villages falling in project area.
Network of Drainage lines, existing water bodies, falling in the project area.
Base maps (transport network, village/boundaries, and settlements).
Land Use / Land cover map.
Contours at 1 meter interval, slope map
Based on GIS thematic layers, field visits, PRA and analysis of benchmark data (as discussed in
chapter 2) final treatment plan on revenue map for implementation would be framed. Thus each
intervention identified has been marked on Gram Panchayat wise contour map with super imposed
Revenue village Khasra map provided by WAPCOS in DPR in annexure.
B) Livelihood Action Plan (LAP)
An awareness programme has been undertaken at Gram Sabha for communication & sensitization
of the target beneficiaries. Livelihood Action Plan is a pre requisite for availing the fund under the
livelihood component. LAP has been prepared by the PIA in consultation WDT, WC & the
members of SHG, women, landless/ assetless households. Details of funds available & their
utilization are as under:
(i)Total project cost Rs 697.5 Lacs
(ii) Funds available under livelihood component is 9% of total project cost= Rs 62.775 Lacs
(a) Seed money for SHGs as revolving fund = Rs 37.7 Lacs
(Minimum 60% of livelihood component)
no of SHG to be formed-144 Nos
No of persons (members) in SHGs- 10-15Nos
(b) Seed money for enterprising individuals = Rs 6.3 Lacs
(Minimum 10% of livelihood component)
no of persons identified as enterprising individuals 26 Nos
List of persons & Proposed Activities. S. No Item Number Revolving fund/Seed
money
% of
LAP
1 SHG
a Existing 6 1.50 2.38
b New 144 36.17 57.61
Sub Total 150 37.67 60
2 Enterprising individuals 26 6.28 10
3
Enterprising
SHG/Federations of SHG 16 18.83 30
Total 192 62.78 100
Proposed Activities (On Farm)*
Name of
activity
*
No of SHGs Revolving fund in lac
Nursery 20 5
Thresher 10 2.5
Goatry 50 12.5
Total 80 20
Proposed Major activities (Off Farm)**
Name of
activity
*
No of SHGs Revolving fund in lacs
Chakki 10 2.5
Porter 20 5
Bottle cover 5 1.25
Sewing /
Knitting
30 7.5
Others 5 1.25
Total 70 17.5
List of persons & Proposed Activities. ( 10% of (9%)
S.
No.
Activity Proposed Name of Person Category
SC /ST /Others
Project fund
Revolving in
lacs
Contributio
n
1 Livelihood Manohar Singh General 0.25 0.075
2 Livelihood Polaram s/o Ramaram Kodaliya
Others 0.25 0.075
3 Livelihood Om Das s/o Kripa Das
SC 0.25 0.075
4 Livelihood Buda ram s/o Tusla Ram
Others 0.25 0.075
5 Livelihood Joga ram s/o Hema ram Meghwal
SC 0.25 0.075
6 Livelihood Tez Singh s/o Uday Singh
General 0.25 0.075
7 Livelihood Arjun ram s/o Ghewar ram Dewasi
Others 0.25 0.075
8 Livelihood Ram Singh s/o Devi Singh Rajpurohit
General 0.25 0.075
9 Livelihood Shiv Raj s/o Dalpat Singh
General 0.25 0.075
10 Livelihood Arjun ram s/o Shiv ji Dewasi
Others 0.25 0.075
11 Livelihood Narpat Singh s/o Jog Singh
Others 0.25 0.075
12 Livelihood Mishri Lal s/o Suwa ram Gujjar
Others 0.25 0.075
13 Livelihood Ramesh s/o Kanaram
Others 0.25 0.075
14 Livelihood Mohan lal s/o Bhuraram Gujjar
Others 0.25 0.075
Total 3.5 1.05
(c) Funds for Enterprising SHG/Federations to avail a composite loan for undertaking major
livelihood activities or to upscale as recommended by the WC & approved by WCDC in
consultation with line departments.
Details of enterprising SHG/federation are given below:
S. No. Name of
SHG/ SHG
federation
Project
Name
Project
Cost in
Lacs
Grant in aid
50% of
Project cost
or 2 lacs
whichever is
less
Bank loan
1 Roop Nath ji IWMP-23 1.25
- -
2 Jay Ambe IWMP-23 - -
3 Jay Jog Maya IWMP-23 - -
4 Vijay Laxmi IWMP-23 - -
5 Maharana
Pratap
IWMP-23 - -
Total 1.25
- -
Details of project activities can be prepared in coming years after formation of SHG federation or as the case may be.
C) Production Plan
An awareness programme has been undertaken at Gram Sabha for communication & sensitization
of the target beneficiaries. Production System & micro enterprises action Plan is prerequisite for
availing the funds under the Production system & micro enterprises component. Production plan
has been prepared by the PIA in consultation with WDT, WC & the members of User Group.
Details of funds & their utilization is as under:
(iii) Total project cost Rs. 697.5 Lacs
(iv) Funds available under Production System & Micro enterprises component is 10% of the total
project cost= Rs69.75 Lacs
List of Persons & proposed Activities for production system and micro enterprise
Name of activity* No. of
house
holds
Cost of
activity in
lacs
WDF
in lacs
A Production System 55 13.95 4.19
B Others
1 Crop Demontration
A Integrated Nutrient
Management
314 7.7 2.3
B Distribution of seed / Mini
kit of HYV
193 34.74 10.42
5 Fodder production 11 0.11 0.032
6 Agro forestry 18 2.86 0.86
Others (specify)
Total 536 45.4 13.616
Awareness Programme -Slogan wall painting
-Scientific Animal Husbandry Practices: Seminars/ Debates/ Pamplet distribution / Stickers/
Chetana Rally
-Broadcasting / telecasting Film Show
-Visit – intra/ inter/ out of State
-Lecture cum field training
Creation of Disease Free Zone: Livestock’s health coverage
-Deworming to reduce worm load and enhance disease resistance. (Convergence with peer
department)
-Free of Cost Vaccination in IWMP AREA Livestock for H.S., B.Q., F.M.D., PFR, ETV and
Sheep Pox
-Ensure Hygienic measures to check Zonosis. (IWMP)
Construction of Animal Sheds with Manger and Portable Manger with accessories Provisions of Cattle Water Troughs Infertility Management: to ensure Livestock’s Productivity
-Expansion of AI Coverage / reduction in no. of infertile females.
PCPD+ COMBAT INFERTILITY +CAMPS INFERTILITY RLDB+CAMPS INFERTILITY SC
COMPONENT
-Breed Improvement: To ensure Livestock‘s Productivity enhancement
-A.I. (Convergence with peer department)
-Registration of bulls (Convergence with peer department)
-Bull/Buck Distribution for NS-,Kankraj, Murrah And Sirohi
-Financial Incentive to the Inseminators for Calf Borns.
-Convergence with Peer Department/ DAH / Agriculture/ATMA/ Trust/ Goseva
-An Assistance to control Malnutrition: Protein Supplementation
-Feed & Fodder production enhancement
Sl no. Activity Unit Unit cost Quantity Total CostCost from
Project
Convergen
ce Fund
Beneficiar
y
contributio
n
Quantity Total CostCost from
Project
Converge
nce Fund
Beneficia
ry
contributi
on
QuantityTotal
Cost
Cost from
Project
Converge
nce Fund
Benefici
ary
contribut
ion
Quantity Total Cost
Cost
from
Project
Convergen
ce Fund
Beneficiar
y
contributi
on
A Prepatory Phase Activities
Capacity building training & EPA
1 Administration 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.15 30.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.37 14.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 25.22 25.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 69.75 69.75 0.00 0.00
1.1 Watershed committee 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.05 9.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.31 4.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.57 7.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.93 20.93 0.00 0.00
1.2 Project Implementing Agency 0.00 0.00 0.00 21.11 21.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.06 10.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.65 17.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 48.83 48.83 0.00 0.00
Sub Total ( 1a+1b) 0.00 0.00 30.15 30.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.37 14.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 25.22 25.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 69.75 69.75 0.00 0.00
2 Monitoring 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.02 3.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.44 1.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.52 2.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.98 6.98 0.00 0.00
2.1 Monitoring by SLNA 20% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.60 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.40 1.40 0.00 0.00
2.2 Monitoring by DWDU 20% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.60 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.40 1.40 0.00 0.00
2.3 Monitoring by PIA 60% 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.81 1.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.86 0.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.51 1.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.19 4.19 0.00 0.00
Sub Total (2.1+2.2+2.3) 0.00 3.02 3.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.44 1.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.52 2.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.98 6.98 0.00 0.00
3 Evaluation 0.00 0.00 3.02 3.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.44 1.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.52 2.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.98 6.98 0.00 0.00
4 Entry point activity No. 0.00 0.00 12.06 12.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.75 5.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.09 10.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 27.90 27.90 0.00 0.00
5 Capacity building No. 0.00 0.00 15.08 15.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.19 7.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.61 12.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 34.88 34.88 0.00 0.00
5.1WC Committee
(POP/CLAY/WOOD/Plastic)0.100 3.00 0.30 0.30 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.00 9.00 0.70 0.70 0.00 0.00
5.2 Wall Painting 0.250 sqm 0.00 0.75 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.74 1.74 0.00 0.00
5.3 Success story/Documentation 0.15 No. 3.00 0.45 0.45 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.22 0.22 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.38 0.38 0.00 0.00 9.00 1.05 1.05 0.00 0.00
5.4 Demonstration 0.20 No. 3.00 0.60 0.60 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.50 0.50 0.00 0.00 9.00 1.40 1.40 0.00 0.00
5.5 Kalajatha/puppet show 0.10 No 10.00 0.30 0.30 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.00 9.00 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.00 24.00 0.70 0.70 0.00 0.00
5.6 Chetna Rally/Night Meeting 0.2 No. 1.00 0.60 0.60 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.50 0.50 0.00 0.00 7.00 1.39 1.39 0.00 0.00
5.7Institution Trainning cum Awarness
programme2.0 No 62.00 6.08 6.08 0.00 0.00 29.00 2.86 2.86 0.00 0.00 37.00 3.57 3.57 0.00 0.00 128.00 12.51 12.51 0.00 0.00
5.8 Exposure visit inter State 1.0 No 3.00 2.98 2.98 0.00 0.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 9.00 9.00 0.00 0.00
5.9 Exposure visit intra state 1.0 No 20.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.88 0.88 0.00 0.00 17.00 2.52 2.52 0.00 0.00 43.00 6.40 6.40 0.00 0.00
Sub Total (
5.1+5.2+5.3+5.4+5.5+5.6+5.7+5.8+5.
9)
0.00 15.08 15.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.19 7.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.61 12.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 34.88 34.88 0.00 0.00
6 Detail project report preparation No. 0.00 3.02 3.02 0.00 0.00 1.44 1.44 0.00 2.52 2.52 6.98 6.98 0.00 0.00
Total (A) 1+2+3+4+5+6 0.00 0.00 66.34 66.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 31.63 31.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 55.49 55.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 153.46 153.46 0.00 0.00
BNatural resource management
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1Conservation measures for arable
land 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1.1 Earthen bund Ha. 0.116 209.50 26.13 24.20 1.93 1.69 257.20 31.64 29.71 1.93 2.08 905.00 106.47 104.55 1.93 7.32 1421.70 164.23 158.46 5.78 11.09
1.2Farmbunding with Neem Plantation
Ha. 0.198 10.00 1.98 1.98 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 1.98 1.98 0.00 0.14 20.00 3.96 3.96 0.00 0.28
1.3 Farm pond No. 0.812 3.67 2.96 1.62 1.34 0.11 3.67 2.96 1.62 1.34 0.11 5.67 4.58 3.25 1.34 0.23 13.00 10.50 6.49 4.01 0.45
SubTotal(B) 1.1 to 1.6 0.00 31.07 27.81 3.26 1.95 0.00 34.60 31.34 3.26 2.19 0.00 113.03 109.77 3.26 7.68 0.00 178.70 168.92 9.78 11.82
2.1 Pasture Development Work Ha. 0.314 285.00 89.42 89.42 0.00 0.00 90.00 28.24 28.24 0.00 0.00 50.00 15.69 15.69 0.00 0.00 425.00 133.35 133.35 0.00 0.00
2.2 Dugout Pond Ha. 0.938 1.00 0.94 0.94 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.94 0.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 1.88 1.88 0.00 0.00
2.3 Low cost drop structure Ha. 0.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.00 0.00
2.4 CCT (Continuous Contour Trench) Ha. 0.0998 161.67 15.54 14.47 1.07 0.00 71.67 6.56 5.49 1.07 0.00 136.67 13.05 11.98 1.07 0.00 370.00 35.14 31.94 3.20 0.00
SubTotal(B) 2.1 to 2.6 0.00 105.90 104.83 1.07 0.00 0.00 36.72 35.66 1.07 0.00 0.00 28.73 27.67 1.07 0.00 0.00 171.35 168.15 3.20 0.00
Drainage line Treatement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.2 LSCD (Loose Stone Check Dam) No. 0.152 90.00 13.64 13.64 0.00 0.00 80.00 12.13 12.13 0.00 0.00 25.00 3.79 3.79 0.00 0.00 195.00 29.56 29.56 0.00 0.00
3.3 Anicut No. 4.00 21.89 21.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 21.89 21.89 0.00 0.00
3.4 WHS (Anicut Repair) No. 0.690 1.00 0.69 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.69 0.69 0.00 0.00
3.9 Gabion No. 1.377 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.38 1.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.38 1.38 0.00 0.00
Sub Total ( B) 3.1 to 3.9 0.00 36.22 36.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.50 13.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.79 3.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 53.51 53.51 0.00 0.00
Grand Total ( B) 1+2+3 0.00 173.19 168.86 4.33 1.95 0.00 84.82 80.49 4.33 2.19 0.00 145.56 141.23 4.33 7.68 0.00 403.57 390.59 12.98 11.82
Chapter III Proposed Development Plan for IWMP 23/11-12
Kharianeev Meo Rupawas Total
C Production system 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1Production measure for Arable
land0.00 0.00 0.00
1.1 Agro forestry (Karunda, aloevera) Ha. 0.20659 12.70 2.62 1.86 0.76 0.56 6.35 1.31 0.55 0.76 0.16 5.88 1.21 0.45 0.76 0.14 24.92 5.15 2.86 2.29 0.86
1.2Crop demonstration (Rabi and Kharif)
Ha. 0.0215 293.93 6.32 2.84 3.48 0.85 259.73 5.58 2.11 3.48 0.63 286.73 6.16 2.69 3.48 0.81 840.40 18.07 7.64 10.43 2.29
1.3 Vegetable Kit (kitchen garden) Ha. 0.173 77.06 13.33 13.32 0.01 4.00 46.06 7.97 7.96 0.01 2.39 78.06 13.50 13.49 0.01 4.05 201.19 34.81 34.77 0.03 10.43
1.4 Fodder demonstration Ha. 0.01 16.50 0.17 0.05 0.12 0.015 13.50 0.14 0.02 0.12 0.006 15.30 0.15 0.04 0.12 0.011 45.30 0.45 0.11 0.35 0.032
1.5 Sprinkler No. 0.23 6.00 1.38 1.15 0.23 0.35 1.00 0.23 0.00 0.23 0.00 1.00 0.23 0.00 0.23 0.00 8.00 1.84 1.15 0.69 0.35
1.6 Pipeline No. 0.12 25.00 3.00 2.40 0.60 0.72 8.00 0.96 0.36 0.60 0.11 28.00 3.36 2.76 0.60 0.83 61.00 7.32 5.52 1.80 1.66
Sub Total C ( 1.1+1.6) 0.00 26.82 21.62 5.20 6.49 0.00 16.19 10.99 5.20 3.30 0.00 24.63 19.43 5.20 5.83 0.00 67.64 52.04 15.59 15.61
2Animals Husbandry and
Production24.00 12.28 6.03 6.25 1.81 11.00 9.12 2.87 6.25 0.86 20.00 11.29 5.04 6.25 1.51 55.00 32.70 13.95 18.75 4.19
Sub Total C ( 2.1+2.4) 0.00 12.28 6.03 6.25 1.81 0.00 9.12 2.87 6.25 0.86 0.00 11.29 5.04 6.25 1.51 0.00 32.70 13.95 18.75 4.19
3 Energy conservation 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.1 Biogas (3cum) No. 0.25 12.00 3.00 2.50 0.50 0.75 4.00 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.15 5.00 1.25 0.75 0.50 0.23 21.00 5.25 3.75 1.50 1.13
Sub Total C ( 3.1) 0.00 3.00 2.50 0.50 0.75 0.00 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.15 0.00 1.25 0.75 0.50 0.23 0.00 5.25 3.75 1.50 1.13
Sub Total C ( 1+2+3) 0.00 42.10 30.15 11.95 9.05 0.00 26.31 14.37 11.95 4.31 0.00 37.17 25.22 11.95 7.57 0.00 105.59 69.74 35.84 20.92
D Livelihood support 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1.1Revolving fund to SHG (60% of 9%)
0.25 65.00 16.28 16.28 0.00 0.00 32.00 7.76 7.76 0.00 0.00 54.00 13.62 13.62 0.00 0.00 151.00 37.66 37.66 0.00 0.00
1.2Revolving Fund to Enterprising
Individual 10% of 9%)No. 0.25 12.00 2.71 2.71 0.00 0.81 6.00 1.29 1.29 0.00 0.39 8.00 2.27 2.27 0.00 0.68 26.00 6.27 6.27 0.00 1.88
1.3 Grand to Aid to enterprising SHG or
Federation of SHG (Max30 % of 9%)No. 2.00 4.00 8.14 8.14 0.00 0.00 2.00 3.88 3.88 0.00 0.00 4.00 6.81 6.81 0.00 0.00 10.00 18.83 18.83 0.00 0.00
No. 4.00 0.00 27.13 27.13 0.00 0.81 0.00 12.93 12.93 0.00 0.39 0.00 22.700 22.700 0.00 0.68 0.00 62.76 62.76 0.00 1.88
E Consolidation Phase 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1.1 Sub- Total D (1.1+1.2+1.3) No. 0.00 1.00 0.00 9.05 0.00 1.00 0.00 4.31 1.00 0.00 7.57 3.00 20.93 20.93 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Sub- Total E 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.93 20.93 0.00 0.00
Grand Total ( A+B+C+D+E) 0.00 0.00 308.76 301.53 16.27 11.81 0.00 155.69 143.72 16.27 6.89 0.00 260.91 252.21 16.27 15.93 0.00 746.3 697.5 48.82 34.63
Signature
PIA- Foundation for Ecological Security Project Manager, WCDC
P.S Sojat, District Pali WD&SC District, Pali
Sub: Total (1.1+1.2+1.3)
Signature
CHAPTER IV
Sl no. Activity Unit Unit cost Quantity Total Cost
Cost from
Project
Convergen
ce Fund
Beneficiary
contribution
APrepratory Phase Activities Capacity
building training & EPA Material Labour
1 Administration 0.00 0.00 0.00 69.75 69.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1.1 Watershed committee 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.93 20.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1.2 Project Implementing Agency 0.00 0.00 0.00 48.83 48.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Sub Total ( 1.1+1.2) 0.00 69.75 69.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 Monitoring 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.975 6.975 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2.1 Monitoring by SLNA 20% 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.40 1.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2.2 Monitoring by DWDU 20% 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.40 1.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2.3 Monitoring by PIA 60% 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.19 4.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Sub Total (2.1+2.2+2.3) 0.00 6.98 6.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3 Evaluation 0.00 0.00 6.98 6.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4 Entry point activity No. 0.00 0.00 27.90 27.90 0.00 0.00 20.70 7.20
5 Capacity building No. 0.00 0.00 34.88 34.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5.1WC Committee
(POP/CLAY/WOOD/Plastic) 0.100 9.00 0.70 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5.2 Wall Painting 0.250 sqm 0.00 1.74 1.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5.3 Success story/Documentation 0.15 No. 9.00 1.05 1.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5.4 Demonstration 0.20 No. 9.00 1.40 1.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5.5 Kalajatha/puppet show 0.10 No 24.00 0.70 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5.6 Chetna Rally/Night Meeting 0.2 No. 7.00 1.39 1.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5.7Institution Trainning cum Awarness
programme 2.0 No 128.00 12.51 12.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5.8 Exposure visit inter State 1.0 No 10.00 9.00 9.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5.9 Exposure visit intra state 1.0 No 43.00 6.40 6.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Sub Total (
5.1+5.2+5.3+5.4+5.5+5.6+5.7+5.8+5.9)0.00 34.88 34.88 0.00 0.00 20.70 7.20
6 Detail project report preparation No. 0.00 6.98 6.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total (A) 1+2+3+4+5+6 0.00 0.00 153.46 153.45 0.00 0.00 20.70 7.20
B Natural resource management
1 Conservation measures for arable land
1.1 Earthen bund Ha. 0.1155 1421.70 164.23 158.46 5.78 11.09 14.81 149.41
1.2 Farmbunding with Neem Plantation Ha. 0.19847 20.00 3.96 3.96 0.00 0.28 0.39 3.58
1.3 Farm pond No. 0.81 13.00 10.50 6.49 4.01 0.45 0 10.5541SubTotal(B) 1.1 to 1.6 0.00 178.70 168.92 9.78 11.82 15.20 163.5
2.1 Pasture Development Work Ha. 0.3138 425.00 133.35 133.35 0.00 0.00 9.27 124.10
Total Cost
Chapter IV
Total Project Cost: 697.5 lac
Project Name: Pali IWMP-23/11-12, Block-Sojat
Activity wise Total Abstract of cost for IWMP-23, Sojat
2.2 Dugout Pond Ha. 0.9377 2.00 1.88 1.88 0.00 0.00 0.1 1.82
2.3 Low cost drop structure Ha. 0.99 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.00 0.00 0.67 0.32
2.4 CCT (Continuous Contour Trench) Ha. 0.0998 370.00 35.14 31.94 3.20 0.00 2.2 21.5SubTotal(B) 2.1 to 2.6 0.00 171.35 168.15 3.20 0.00 12.22 147.70Drainage line Treatment
3.2 LSCD (Loose Stone Check Dam) No. 0.15 195.00 29.56 29.56 0.00 0.00 28.22 1.33
3.3 Anicut No. 4.00 21.89 21.89 0.00 0.00 15.06 6.83
3.4 WHS (Anicut Repair) No. 0.69 1.00 0.69 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.43
3.9 Gabion No. 1.38 1.00 1.38 1.38 0.00 0.00 0.92 0.46Sub Total ( B) 3.1 to 3.9 0.00 53.51 53.51 0.00 0.00 44.47 9.05Grand Total ( B) 1+2+3 0.00 403.57 390.59 12.98 0.00 71.9 320.3
C Production system
1 Production measure for Arable land 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1.1 Agro forestry (Karunda, aloevera) Ha. 0.21 24.92 5.15 2.86 2.29 0.86 1.98 3.17
1.2 Crop demonstration (Rabi and Kharif) Ha. 0.0215 840.40 18.07 7.64 10.43 2.29 18.07 0.0000
1.3 Vegetable Kit (kitchen garden) Ha. 0.173 201.19 34.81 34.77 0.03 10.43 21.57 13.3
1.4 Fodder demonstration Ha. 0.01 45.30 0.45 0.11 0.35 0.032 0.453 0.0000
1.5 Sprinkler No. 0.23 8.00 1.84 1.15 0.69 0.35 1.84 0.0000
1.6 Pipeline No. 0.12 61.00 7.32 5.52 1.80 1.66 7.32 0.0000Sub Total C ( 1.1+1.6) 0.00 67.64 52.04 15.59 15.61 51.23 16.4
2 Animals Husbandary and Production 55.00 32.70 13.95 18.75 4.19 32.7 0Sub Total C ( 2.1+2.4) 0.00 32.70 13.95 18.75 4.19 32.7 0
3 Energy conservation
3.1 Biogas (3cum) No. 0.25 21.00 5.25 3.75 1.50 1.13 5.25 0.0000Sub Total C ( 3.1) 0.25 0.00 5.25 3.75 1.50 1.13 5.25 0Grand Total C ( 1+2+3) 0.00 105.59 69.74 35.84 20.92 89.18 16.44
D Livelihood support
1.1 Revolving fund to SHG (60% of 9%) 0.25 151.00 37.66 37.66 0.00 0.00 37.67 0.00
1.2Revolving Fund to Enterprising Individual
10% of 9%) No. 0.25 26.00 6.27 6.27 0.00 1.88 6.28 0.00
1.3Grand to Aid to enterprising SHG or
Federation of SHG (Max30 % of 9%) No. 2.00 10.00 18.83 18.83 0.00 0.00 18.83 0.00Grand Total D No. 0.00 0.00 62.76 62.76 0.00 1.88 62.78 0.00
E Consolidation Phase 3.00 20.93 20.93 0.00 0.00 0 0Grand Total E 0.00 0.00 20.93 20.93 0.00 0.00 0 0
Grand Total ( A+B+C+D+E) 0.00 746.3 697.47 48.82 34.63 244.54 343.94
Signature
PIA- Foundation for Ecological Security Project Manager, WCDC
WD&SC District, PaliP.S Sojat, District Pali
Signature
CHAPTER V
Total Area 2010.32 Ha.
Total sanction Amount 301.55 Rs.
Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin
1 Administration 10 0 0 0 30.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.55 0.00 7.54 0.00 6.03 0.00 6.03 0.00 30.15
1.1 Watershed committee 3 0 0 0 9.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.17 0.00 2.26 0.00 1.81 0.00 1.81 0.00 9.05
1.2 Project Implementing Agency 7 0 0 0 21.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.39 0.00 5.28 0.00 4.22 0.00 4.22 0.00 21.11
Sub Total ( 1.1+1.2) 30.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.55 0.00 7.54 0.00 6.03 0.00 6.03 0.00 30.15
2 Monitoring 1 0 0 0 3.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.36 0.00 0.75 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.60 0.00 3.02
2.1 Monitoring by SLNA 20% 20 0 0 0 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.60
2.2 Monitoring by DWDU 20% 20 0 0 0 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.60
2.3 Monitoring by PIA 60% 60 0 0 0 1.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.00 0.45 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.36 0.00 1.81
Sub Total (2.1+2.2+2.3) 3.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.06 0.00 0.75 0.00 0.60 0.00 0.60 0.00 3.02
3 Evaluation 1 0 0 3.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.00 1.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.51 0.00 3.02
4 Entry point activity 4 No. 0 0 12.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.06
5 Capacity building 5 No. 0 0 15.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.05 3.02 3.02 0.00 0.00 15.08
5.1WC Committee
(POP/CLAY/WOOD/Plastic)0.100 3 0.225 0.30 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.18 1.00 0.06 1.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.30
5.2 Wall Painting 0.250 sqm 0 0 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.75
5.3 Success story/Documentation 0.15 No. 3 0 0.45 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.27 1.00 0.09 1.00 0.09 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.45
5.4 Demonstration 0.20 No. 3 0.225 0.60 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.36 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.60
5.5 Kalajatha/puppet show 0.10 No 10 0.03 0.30 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.18 2.00 0.06 2.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.30
5.6 Chetna Rally/Night Meeting 0.2 No. 1 0.6 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.60
5.7Institution Trainning cum Awarness
programmeNo 62 0.098 6.08 0.00 0.00 38.00 3.65 12.00 1.22 12.00 1.22 0.00 0.00 62.00 6.08
5.8 Exposure visit inter state No 3 1.49 2.98 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.79 1.00 0.60 1.00 0.60 0.00 0.00 3.00 2.98
5.9 Exposure visit intra State No 20 0.15 3.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 1.80 5.00 0.60 5.00 0.60 0.00 0.00 20.00 3.00
Sub Total (
5.1+5.2+5.3+5.4+5.5+5.6+5.7+5.8+5.9)15.08 0.00 0.00 8.68 3.49 2.89 0.00 0.00 15.08
6 Detail project report preparation 1 No. 3.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.02
Total (A) 1+2+3+4+5+6 66.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 35.67 0.00 12.99 0.00 9.53 0.00 8.14 0.00 66.34
BNatural resource
management56 168.867
1Conservation measures for arable
land
1.1 Earthen bund Ha. 209.5 0.116 24.20 0.00 0.00 83.80 9.68 83.80 9.68 41.90 4.84 0.00 0.00 209.50 24.20
1.2 Farm bunding With neem plantation Ha. 10 0.198 1.985 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.79 4.00 0.79 2.00 0.40 0.00 0.00 10.00 1.98
1.3 Farm pond No. 2 0.812 1.624 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.81 1.00 0.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 1.62
SubTotal(B) 1.1 to 1.3 27.810 0.00 0.00 11.29 11.29 5.24 0.00 0.00 27.810
2.1 Pasture Development Work Ha. 285 0.314 89.422 0.00 0.00 114.00 35.77 114.00 35.77 57.00 17.88 0.00 0.00 285.00 89.42
2.2 Dugout Pond No 1 0.9377 0.938 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.94
2.3 Low cost drop structure No 0 0.99 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2.4 CCT (Continuous Contour Trench) Ha. 145 0.0998 14.474 0.00 0.00 58.00 5.79 58.00 5.79 29.00 2.89 0.00 0.00 145.00 14.47
SubTotal(B) 2.1 to 2.3 104.833 0.00 0.00 42.50 41.56 20.78 0.00 0.00 104.833
Unit Ha/
Nos
2015-2016Quantity
Unit
cost(A)
2012-2013
Chapter- V (A)
Annual Action Plan Through project fund
Gram panchayat : Kharianeev
Prepatory Phase Activities Capacity
building training & EPA
% of the
budget
2016-20172014-20152013-2014Total cost (in Rs.)
Total
Drainage line Treatment 0.00 0.00
3.1 LSCD (Loose Stone Check Dam) No. 90 0.152 13.641 0.00 0.00 36.00 5.46 36.00 5.46 18.00 2.73 0.00 0.00 90.00 13.64
3.2 Anicut No. 4 21.890 0.00 0.00 2.00 11.62 2.00 10.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 21.89
3.3 WHS (Anicut repair) No. 1 0.690 0.690 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.69
3.4 Gabion No. 0 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Sub Total ( B) 3.1 to 3.9 36.221 0.00 0.00 17.08 15.73 2.73 0.00 0.00 36.221
Grand Total ( B) 1+2+3 168.864 0.00 0.00 0.00 70.86 0.00 68.57 0.00 28.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 168.864
C Production system 10 30.155
1Production measure for Arable land
1.1 Agroforestry (Karunda, aloevera) Ha. 9 0.20659 1.86 0.00 0.00 1.80 0.37 3.15 0.65 3.15 0.65 0.90 0.19 9.00 1.86
1.2 Crop demonstration (Rabi and Kharif) No 132.2 0.0215 2.84 0.00 0.00 26.44 0.57 46.27 0.99 46.27 0.99 13.22 0.28 132.20 2.84
1.3 Vegetable Kit No 77 0.173 13.32 0.00 0.00 15.40 2.66 26.95 4.66 26.95 4.66 7.70 1.33 77.00 13.32
1.4 Fodder demonstration Ha. 5 0.01 0.05 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.01 1.75 0.02 1.75 0.02 0.50 0.01 5.00 0.05
1.5 Sprinkler No 5 0.23 1.15 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.23 1.75 0.40 1.75 0.40 0.50 0.12 5.00 1.15
1.6 Pipeline No 20 0.12 2.40 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.48 7.00 0.84 7.00 0.84 2.00 0.24 20.00 2.40
Sub Total C ( 1.1+1.6) 21.62 0.00 0.00 4.32 7.57 7.57 2.16 21.62
2Animals Husbandary and Production
No 24 0.25 6.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.81 0.00 1.81 0.00 2.41 0.00 0.00 24.00 6.03
Sub Total C ( 2.1+2.5) 6.03 6.03
3 Energy conservation
3.1 Biogas (3cum) No. 10 0.25 2.50 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.50 3.50 0.88 3.50 0.88 1.00 0.25 10.00 2.50
Sub Total C ( 3.1) 10 2.50 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.50 3.50 0.88 3.50 0.88 1.00 0.25 10.00 2.50
Sub Total C ( 1+2+3) 30.15 0.00 0.00 4.82 8.44 8.44 2.41 30.1536
D Livelihood support 9 0.23932 27.14
1.1 Revolving fund to SHG (60% of 9%) 60 65 0.25 16.20 0.00 0.00 10.00 2.50 23.00 5.70 22.00 5.50 10.00 2.50 65.00 16.28
1.2Revolving Fund to Enterprising
Individual 10% of 9%)10 No. 12 0.25 2.70 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.50 4.00 0.85 4.00 0.85 2.00 0.50 12.00 2.71
1.3Grand to Aid to enterprising SHG or
Federation of SHG (Max30 % of 9%)30 No. 4 2 8.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 4.00 2.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 8.14
Sub- Total D (1.1+1.2+1.3) No. 26.90 0.00 0.00 3.00 10.55 10.35 3.00 27.13
E Consolidation Phase 3 0 9.05
1.1 Consolidation Phase No. 1 9.05 9.05 9.05 1.00 9.05
Sub- Total E 1 9.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.05 1.00 9.05
Grand Total ( A+B+C+D+E) 301.303 0.00 0.00 110.03 92.99 49.50 20.44 301.53
PIA- Foundation for Ecological Security Project Manager, WCDC
P.S Sojat, District Pali WD&SC District, Pali
SignatureSignature
Total Area 958.31 Ha.
Total sanction Amount 143.75 Rs.
Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin
1 Administration 10 0 0 0 14.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.03 0.00 3.59 0.00 2.87 0.00 2.87 0.00 14.37
1.1 Watershed committee 3 0 0 0 4.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.51 0.00 1.08 0.00 0.86 0.00 0.86 0.00 4.31
1.2 Project Implementing Agency 7 0 0 0 10.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.52 0.00 2.52 0.00 2.01 0.00 2.01 0.00 10.06
Sub Total ( 1.1+1.2) 14.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.03 0.00 3.59 0.00 2.87 0.00 2.87 0.00 14.37
2 Monitoring 1 0 0 0 1.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.29 0.00 1.44
2.1 Monitoring by SLNA 20% 20 0 0 0 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.29
2.2 Monitoring by DWDU 20% 20 0 0 0 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.29
2.3 Monitoring by PIA 60% 60 0 0 0 0.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.86
Sub Total (2.1+2.2+2.3) 1.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.29 0.00 1.44
3 Evaluation 1 0 0 1.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.72 0.00 1.44
4 Entry point activity 4 No. 0 0 5.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.75
5 Capacity building 5 No. 0 0 7.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.00 1.44 0.00 1.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.19
5.1WC Committee
(POP/CLAY/WOOD/Plastic)0.100 3 0 0.14 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.09 1.00 0.03 1.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.14
5.2 Wall Painting 0.250 sqm 0 0 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.36
5.3 Success story/Documentation 0.15 No. 3 0 0.22 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.13 1.00 0.04 1.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.22
5.4 Demonstration 0.20 No. 3 0 0.29 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.17 1.00 0.06 1.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.29
5.5 Kalajatha/puppet show 0.10 No 5 0.03 0.14 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.09 1.00 0.03 1.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.14
5.6 Chetna Rally/Night Meeting 0.2 No. 3 0 0.29 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.17 1.00 0.06 1.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.29
5.7Institution Trainning cum Awarness
programmeNo 29 0.098 2.86 0.00 0.00 10.00 1.72 9.00 0.57 10.00 0.57 0.00 0.00 29.00 2.86
5.8 Exposure visit inter State No 3 1 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.20 1.00 0.40 1.00 0.40 0.00 0.00 3.00 2.00
5.9 Exposure visit intra state No 6 0.15 0.88 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.53 1.00 0.18 1.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.88Sub Total (
5.1+5.2+5.3+5.4+5.5+5.6+5.7+5.8+5.
9)
55 7.18 0.00 0.00 4.31 1.44 1.44 0.00 0.00 7.18
6 Detail project report preparation 1 No. 1.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.44
Total (A) 1+2+3+4+5+6 31.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.32 0.00 5.96 0.00 4.45 0.00 3.88 0.00 31.61
B Natural resource management 56 0.005 80.498
1Conservation measures for arable
land
1.1 Earthen bund Ha. 257.20 0.12 29.71 0.00 0.00 102.88 11.88 102.88 11.88 51.44 5.94 0.00 0.00 257.20 29.71
1.2 Farm bunding With neem plantation Ha. 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1.3 Farm pond No. 2.00 0.81185 1.62 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.81 1.00 0.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 1.62
SubTotal(B) 1.1 to 1.2 31.34 0.00 0.00 12.70 12.70 5.94 0.00 0.00 31.34
2.1 Pasture Development Work Ha. 90.00 0.31 28.24 0.00 0.00 36.00 11.30 36.00 11.30 18.00 5.65 0.00 0.00 90.00 28.24
2.2 Dugout Pond No. 1.00 0.9377 0.94 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.94
2.3 Low cost drop structure Ha. 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.99
2.4 CCT (Continuous Contour Trench) Ha. 55.00 0.0998 5.49 0.00 0.00 22.00 2.20 22.00 2.20 11.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 55.00 5.49
SubTotal(B) 2.1 to 2.3 35.66 0.00 0.00 15.42 13.49 6.75 0.00 0.00 35.66
Drainage line Treatment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.2 LSCD (Loose Stone Check Dam) No. 80.00 0.15 12.13 0.00 0.00 32.00 4.85 32.00 4.85 16.00 2.43 0.00 0.00 80.00 12.13
3.3 Anicut No. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00WHS (Anicut repair) 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.9 Gabion No. 1.00 1.38 1.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.38
Sub Total ( B) 3.1 to 3.9 81.00 13.50 0.00 0.00 4.85 4.85 2.43 0.00 0.00 13.50
Grand Total ( B) 1+2+3 80.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.96 0.00 31.04 0.00 15.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 80.493
Chapter- V (A)
Annual Action Plan Through project fund
Total2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017
Gram panchayat : Meo
(A)Prepatory Phase Activities
Capacity building training & EPA% of the budget Unit Ha/ Nos quantity Unit cost
Total
cost (in
C Production system 10 14.37
1Production measure for Arable
land11.50 14.37
1.1 Agroforestry (Karunda, aloevera) Ha. 2.65 0.21 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.11 0.93 0.19 0.93 0.19 0.27 0.05 2.65 0.55
1.2Crop demonstration (Rabi and Kharif)
No 98.00 0.02 2.11 0.00 0.00 19.60 0.42 34.30 0.74 34.30 0.74 9.80 0.21 98.00 2.11
1.3 Vegetable Kit No 46.00 0.173 7.96 0.00 0.00 9.20 1.59 16.10 2.79 16.10 2.79 4.60 0.80 46.00 7.96
1.4 Fodder demonstration Ha. 2.00 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.70 0.01 0.70 0.01 0.20 0.00 2.00 0.02
1.5 Sprinkler No 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1.6 Pipeline No 3.00 0.12 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.60 0.07 1.05 0.13 1.05 0.13 0.30 0.04 3.00 0.36
Sub Total C ( 1.1+1.6) 151.65 10.99 0.00 0.00 2.20 3.85 3.85 1.10 10.99
2Animals Husbandry and
Production11.00 0.25 2.87 0.00 0.86 0.86 1.15 11.00 2.87
Sub Total C ( 2.1+2.4) 2.87 2.87
3 Energy conservation
3.1 Biogas (3cum) No. 2.00 0.25 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.10 0.70 0.18 0.70 0.18 0.20 0.05 2.00 0.50
Sub Total C ( 3.1) 2.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.10 0.70 0.18 0.70 0.18 0.20 0.05 2.00 0.50
Sub Total C ( 1+2+3) 153.65 14.37 0.00 0.00 2.30 4.02 4.02 1.15 14.37
D Livelihood support 9 12.94
1.1Revolving fund to SHG (60% of 9%)
60 32.00 0.25 7.75 0.00 0.00 5.00 1.20 11.00 2.75 11.00 2.75 5.00 1.05 32.00 7.76
1.2Revolving Fund to Enterprising
Individual 10% of 9%)10 No. 6.00 0.25 1.25 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.25 2.00 0.50 2.00 0.25 1.00 0.25 6.00 1.29
1.3 Grand to Aid to enterprising SHG or
Federation of SHG (Max30 % of 9%)
30 No. 3.00 2.00 3.85 0.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.85 0.00 0.00 2.00 3.88
Sub- Total D (1.1+1.2+1.3) No. 41.00 12.85 0.00 0.00 3.45 3.25 4.85 1.30 12.93
E Consolidation Phase 3 0 4.31
1.1 Consolidation Phase No. 1.00 4.31 4.31 1.00 4.31 1.00 4.31
Sub- Total E 1 4.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 4.31 1.00 4.31
Grand Total ( A+B+C+D+E) 143.64 0.00 0.00 53.83 40.43 24.59 9.54 143.72
Signature
PIA- Foundation for Ecological Security Project Manager, WCDC
P.S Sojat, District Pali WD&SC District, Pali
Signature
Total Area 1681.37 Ha.
Total sanction Amount 252.21 Rs.
Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin
1 Administration 10 0 0 0 25.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.83 0.00 6.31 0.00 5.04 0.00 5.04 0.00 25.22
1.1 Watershed committee 3 0 0 0 7.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.65 0.00 1.89 0.00 1.51 0.00 1.51 0.00 7.57
1.2 Project Implementing Agency 7 0 0 0 17.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.18 0.00 4.41 0.00 3.53 0.00 3.53 0.00 17.65
Sub Total ( 1.1+1.2) 0 25.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.83 0.00 6.31 0.00 5.04 0.00 5.04 0.00 25.22
2 Monitoring 1 0 0 0 2.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.13 0.00 0.63 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.50 0.00 2.52
2.1 Monitoring by SLNA 20% 20 0 0 0 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.50
2.2 Monitoring by DWDU 20% 20 0 0 0 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.50
2.3 Monitoring by PIA 60% 60 0 0 0 1.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.68 0.00 0.38 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.15 0.00 1.51
Sub Total (2.1+2.2+2.3) 0 2.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.13 0.00 0.63 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.25 0.00 2.52
3 Evaluation 1 0 0 2.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 1.01 0 0.00 0 1.26 0.00 2.52
4 Entry point activity 4 No. 0 0 10.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.09 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 10.09
5 Capacity building 5 No. 0 0 12.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.57 0.00 2.52 0 2.52 0 0.00 0.00 12.61
5.1 WC Committee (POP/CLAY/WOOD/Plastic) 0.100 3 0 0.25 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.15 1.00 0.05 1.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.25
5.2 Wall Painting 0.250 sqm 0 0 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.38 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.63
5.3 Success story/Documentation 0.15 No. 3 0 0.38 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.23 1.00 0.08 1.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.38
5.4 Demonstration 0.20 No. 3 0 0.50 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.30 1.00 0.10 1.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.50
5.5 Kalajatha/puppet show 0.10 9 0.03 0.25 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.15 2.00 0.05 2.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 9.00 0.25
5.6 Chetna Rally/Night Meeting 0.2 No. 3 0 0.50 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.30 1.00 0.10 1.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.50
5.7 Institution Trainning cum Awarness programme No37 0.098 3.57 0.00 0.00 12.00 2.14 12.00 0.71 13.00 0.71 0.00 0.00 37.00 3.57
5.8 Exposure visit inter State No 4 1.5 4.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 2.40 1.00 0.80 1.00 0.80 0.00 0.00 4.00 4.00
5.9 Exposure visit intra state No 17 0.15 2.52 0.00 0.00 7.00 1.51 5.00 0.50 5.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 17.00 2.52
Sub Total (
5.1+5.2+5.3+5.4+5.5+5.6+5.7+5.8+5.9)0 12.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.57 0.00 2.52 0.00 2.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.61
6 Detail project report preparation 1 No. 0 2.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.52
Total (A) 1+2+3+4+5+6 0 55.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.39 0.00 10.47 0.00 8.07 0.00 6.56 0.00 55.49
(B) Natural resource management 56 0.00643 141.24
1 Conservation measures for arable land
1.1 Earthan bund Ha. 905 0.116 104.55 0.00 0.00 362.00 41.82 362.00 41.82 181.00 20.91 0.00 0.00 905.00 104.55
1.2 Farm bunding With neem plantation 10 0.198 1.98 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.79 4.00 0.79 2.00 0.40 0.00 0.00 10.00 1.98
1.3 Farm pond No. 4 0.812 3.25 0 0 2.00 1.62 2.00 1.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 3.25
SubTotal(B) 1.1 to 1.2 0 109.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 44.23 0.00 44.23 0.00 21.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 109.773
2.1 Pasture Development Work Ha. 50 0.314 15.69 0.00 0.00 20.00 6.28 20.00 6.28 10.00 3.14 0.00 0.00 50.00 15.69
2.2 Dugout Pond 0 0.960 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2.3 Low cost drop structure Ha. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2.4 CCT (Continuous Contour Trench) Ha. 120.00 0.0998 11.98 0.00 0.00 48.00 4.79 48.00 4.79 24.00 2.40 0.00 0.00 120.00 11.98
SubTotal(B) 2.1 to 2.6 0 27.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.07 0.00 11.07 0.00 5.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 27.666
Drainage line Treatment
3.2 LSCD (Loose Stone Check Dam) No. 25 0.152 3.79 0.00 0.00 10.00 1.52 10.00 1.52 5.00 0.76 0.00 0.00 25.00 3.79
3.3 Anicut No. 0 5.473 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.4 WHS (Anicut Repair) No. 0 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.9 Gabion No. 0 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Sub Total ( B) 3.1 to 3.9 0 3.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.52 0.00 1.52 0.00 0.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.789
Grand Total ( B) 1+2+3 0 141.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 56.82 0.00 56.82 0.00 27.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 141.229
C Production system 10 -0.0034 25.2206
1 Production measure for Arable land 20.18
1.1 Agroforestry (Karunda, aloevera) Ha. 2.18 0.2066 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.09 0.76 0.16 0.76 0.16 0.22 0.05 2.18 0.45
1.2 Crop demonstration (Rabi and Kharif) No 125 0.0215 2.69 0.00 0.00 25.00 0.54 43.75 0.94 43.75 0.94 12.50 0.27 125.00 2.69
Annual Action Plan Through project fund
Chapter- V (A)
Total2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017
Gram panchayat : Rupawas
(A)Prepatory Phase Activities Capacity building
training & EPA
% of the
budget
Unit Ha/
Nosquantity Unit cost
Total cost
(in Rs.)
1.3 Vegetable Kit No 78 0.173 13.49 0.00 0.00 15.60 2.70 27.30 4.72 27.30 4.72 7.80 1.35 78.00 13.49
1.4 Fodder demonstration Ha. 3.8 0.01 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.76 0.01 1.33 0.01 1.33 0.01 0.38 0.00 3.80 0.04
1.5 Sprinkler No 0 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1.6 Pipeline No 23 0.12 2.76 0.00 0.00 4.60 0.55 8.05 0.97 8.05 0.97 2.30 0.28 23.00 2.76
Sub Total C ( 1.1+1.6) 0 19.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.89 0.00 6.80 0.00 6.80 0.00 1.94 0.00 19.43
2 Animals Husbandry and Production 20 5.04 0.00 1.51 1.51 2.02 20.00 5.04
Sub Total C ( 2.1+2.4) 0 5.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.04
3 Energy conservation
3.1 Biogas (3cum) No. 3 0.25 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.60 0.15 1.05 0.26 1.05 0.26 0.30 0.08 3.00 0.75
Sub Total C ( 3.1) 0 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.75
Sub Total C ( 1+2+3) 0 25.2240 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.04 0.00 7.06 0.00 7.06 0.00 2.02 0.00 25.2240
D Livelihood support 9 0.04849522.70
1.1 Revolving fund to SHG (60% of 9%) 6054 0.25 13.50 0.00 0.00 8.00 2.00 19.00 4.80 19.00 4.80 8.00 2.00 54.00 13.62
1.2
Revolving Fund to Enterprising Individual 10% of
9%) 10 No.8 0.25 2.25 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.25 3.00 0.75 3.00 0.75 1.00 0.50 8.00 2.27
1.3
Grand to Aid to enterprising SHG or Federation of
SHG (Max30 % of 9%) 30 No.
4 2 6.80 0.00 0.00 2.00 4.00 1.00 0.80 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 6.81
Sub- Total D (1.1+1.2+1.3) No.0 22.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.25 0.00 6.35 0.00 7.55 0.00 2.50 0.00 22.700
E Consolidation Phase 3 07.57
1.1 Consolidation Phase No.1.0 7.57 7.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.57 1.00 7.57
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Sub- Total E 10 7.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.57 0.00 7.57
Grand Total ( A+B+C+D+E) 252.156 0.00 0.00 0.00 93.61 0.00 73.90 0.00 43.48 0.00 16.70 0.00 252.21
Signature
PIA- Foundation for Ecological Security Project Manager, WCDC
P.S Sojat, District Pali WD&SC District, Pali
Signature
Annual Action Plan Through project fund
Total Area 4650.00 Ha.
Total sanction Amount 697.50 Rs.
Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin
1 Administration 10 0 0 0 69.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 24.41 0.00 17.44 0.00 13.95 0.00 13.95 0.00 69.75
1.1 Watershed committee 3 0 0 0 20.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.32 0.00 5.23 0.00 4.19 0.00 4.19 0.00 20.93
1.2 Project Implementing Agency 7 0 0 0 48.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.09 0.00 12.21 0.00 9.77 0.00 9.77 0.00 48.83
Sub Total ( 1a+1b) 0 69.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 24.41 0.00 17.44 0.00 13.95 0.00 13.95 0.00 69.75
2 Monitoring 1 0 0 0 6.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.14 0.00 1.74 0.00 0.70 0.00 1.40 0.00 6.98
2.1 Monitoring by SLNA 20% 20 0 0 0 1.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.57 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.23 0.00 1.40
2.2 Monitoring by DWDU 20% 20 0 0 0 1.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.57 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.23 0.00 1.40
2.3 Monitoring by PIA 60% 60 0 0 0 4.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.70 0.00 1.05 0.00 0.75 0.00 0.69 0.00 4.19
Sub Total (2.1+2.2+2.3) 0 6.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.84 0.00 1.74 0.00 1.25 0.00 1.14 0.00 6.98
3 Evaluation 1 0 0 6.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.70 0.00 2.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.49 0.00 6.98
4 Entry point activity 4 No. 0 0 27.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 27.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 27.90
5 Capacity building 5 No. 0 0 34.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.93 0.00 6.98 0.00 6.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 34.88
5.1
WC Committee
(POP/CLAY/WOOD/Plastic)0.100
9.00 0 0.70 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.42 3.00 0.14 3.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 9.00 0.70
5.2 Wall Painting 0.250 sqm 0 0 1.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.05 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.74
5.3 Success story/Documentation 0.15 No. 9.00 0 1.05 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.63 3.00 0.21 3.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 9.00 1.05
5.4 Demonstration 0.20 No. 9.00 0 1.40 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.84 3.00 0.28 3.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 9.00 1.40
5.5 Kalajatha/puppet show 0.10 No 24.00 0.03 0.70 0.00 0.00 14.00 0.42 5.00 0.14 5.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 24.00 0.70
5.6 Chetna Rally/Night Meeting 0.2 No. 7.00 0 1.395 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.48 3.00 0.76 2.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 7.00 1.39
5.7
Institution Trainning cum Awarness
programme No 128.00 0.098 12.51 0.00 0.00 60.00 7.51 33.00 2.50 35.00 2.50 0.00 0.00 128.00 12.51
5.8 Exposure visit inter State No 10.00 1.166 9.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 5.39 3.00 1.80 3.00 1.80 0.00 0.00 10.00 9.00
5.9 Exposure visit intra state No 43.00 0.203 6.40 0.00 0.00 21.00 3.84 11.00 1.28 11.00 1.28 0.00 0.00 43.00 6.40Sub Total (
5.1+5.2+5.3+5.4+5.5+5.6+5.7+5.8+5.
9) 0 34.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.56 0.00 7.45 0.00 6.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 34.88
6 Detail project report preparation 1 No. 6.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.98
Total (A) 1+2+3+4+5+6 0 153.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 83.38 0.00 29.42 0.00 22.05 0.00 18.58 0.00 153.44
B Natural resource management 56 390.6
1
Conservation measures for arable
land
1.1 Earthen bund Ha. 1371.7 0.116 158.5 0.00 0.00 548.68 63.38 548.68 63.38 274.34 31.69 0.00 0.00 1371.70 158.46
1.2 Farm bunding With neem plantation Ha. 20.0 0.198 3.96 0.00 0.00 8.00 1.59 8.00 1.59 4.00 0.79 0.00 0.00 20.00 3.96
1.3 Farm pond No. 8.0 0.812 6.5 4.00 3.25 4.00 3.25 4.00 3.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.00 6.49
SubTotal(B) 1.1 to 1.3 0.00 168.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 68.22 0.00 68.22 0.00 32.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 168.92
2.1 Pasture Development Work Ha. 425.0 0.314 133.3 0.00 0.00 170.00 53.34 170.00 53.34 85.00 26.67 0.00 0.00 425.00 133.35
2.2 Dugout Pond 2.0 0.938 1.88 0.00 0.00 2.00 1.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 1.88
2.3 Low cost drop structure Ha. 1.0 0.99 0.99 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.99
2.4 CCT (Continuous Contour Trench) Ha. 320.0 0.064 31.9 0.00 0.00 128.00 12.78 128.00 12.78 64.00 6.39 0.00 0.00 320.00 31.94
SubTotal(B) 2.1 to 2.6 0.00 168.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 68.98 0.00 66.12 0.00 33.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 168.15
Drainage line Treatement
3.2 LSCD (Loose Stone Check Dam) No. 195.0 0.152 29.6 0.00 0.00 78.00 11.82 78.00 11.82 39.00 5.91 0.00 0.00 195.00 29.56
3.3 Anicut No. 4.0 21.89 0.00 0.00 2.00 11.62 2.00 10.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 21.89
3.4 WHS (Anicut Repair) No. 1.0 0.690 0.7 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.69
3.9 Gabion No. 1.0 1.377 1.4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.38
Chapter- V (A) Project Name: Pali IWMP-23/11-12, Block-Sojat, District Pali
Consolidation Sheet
Unit
Ha/ Nosquantity Unit cost
Prepatory Phase Activities
Capacity building training & EPA
2014-2015 2016-20172013-2014 Total2015-2016(A)
2012-2013% of the
budget
Total cost
(in Rs.)
Sub Total ( B) 3.1 to 3.9 0.00 2.218 53.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 24.13 0.00 23.47 0.00 5.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 53.51
Grand Total ( B) 1+2+3 0.00 2.218 390.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 161.33 0.00 157.80 0.00 71.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 390.59
C Production system 10 0.01 69.75
1
Production measure for Arable
land
1.1 Agro forestry (Karunda, aloevera) Ha. 13.8 0.20659 2.86 0.00 0.00 2.77 0.57 4.84 1.00 4.84 1.00 1.38 0.29 13.83 2.86
1.2
Crop demonstration (Rabi and
Kharif) Ha. 355.2 0.0215 7.6 0.00 0.00 71.04 1.53 124.32 2.67 124.32 2.67 35.52 0.76 355.20 7.64
1.3 Vegetable Kit (kitchen garden) Ha. 201.0 0.173 34.8 0.00 0.00 40.20 6.95 70.35 12.17 70.35 12.17 20.10 3.48 201.00 34.77
1.4 Fodder demonstration Ha. 10.8 0.01 0.1 0.00 0.00 2.16 0.02 3.78 0.04 3.78 0.04 1.08 0.01 10.80 0.11
1.5 Sprinkler No 5.0 0.23 1.2 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.23 1.75 0.40 1.75 0.40 0.50 0.12 5.00 1.15
1.6 Pipeline No 46.0 0.12 5.5 0.00 0.00 9.20 1.10 16.10 1.93 16.10 1.93 4.60 0.55 46.00 5.52
Sub Total C ( 1.1+1.6) 0.00 52.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.41 0.00 18.22 0.00 18.22 0.00 5.20 0.00 52.04
2
Animals Husbandry and
Production 55.00 0.25 13.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.19 0.00 4.19 0.00 5.58 0.00 0.00 55.00 13.95
Sub Total C ( 2.1+2.4) 0.00 13.95 0.00 4.19 4.19 5.58 0.00 13.95
3 Energy conservation
3.1 Biogas (3cum) No. 15.0 0.25 3.8 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.75 5.25 1.31 5.25 1.31 1.50 0.38 15.00 3.75
Sub Total C ( 3.1) 0.00 0.50 3.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.00 1.31 0.00 1.31 0.00 0.38 0.00 3.75
Sub Total C ( 1+2+3) 0.00 0.75 69.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.34 0.00 23.71 0.00 25.11 0.00 5.58 0.00 69.745
D Livelihood support 9 0.475 62.78
1.1 Revolving fund to SHG (60% of 9%) 60 151.0 0.25 37.45 0.00 0.00 23.00 5.70 53.00 13.36 52.00 13.05 23.00 5.55 151.00 37.66
1.2
Revolving Fund to Enterprising
Individual 10% of 9%) 10 No. 26.0 0.25 6.20 0.00 0.00 4.00 1.00 9.00 2.17 9.00 1.85 4.00 1.25 26.00 6.27
1.3
Grand to Aid to enterprising SHG or
Federation of SHG (Max30 % of 9%) 30 No. 10.0 2.0 18.7 0.00 0.00 3.00 6.00 3.00 4.98 4.00 7.85 0.00 0.00 10.00 18.83
Sub- Total D (1.1+1.2+1.3) No. 0.00 4.00 62.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.70 0.00 20.51 0.00 22.75 0.00 6.80 0.00 62.76
E Consolidation Phase 3 0 20.93
1.1 Consolidation Phase No. 3.0 0.0 20.9 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 20.93 3.00 20.93
Sub- Total E 0.00 0.00 20.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.93 0.00 20.925
Grand Total ( A+B+C+D+E) 0.00 0.00 697.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 272.75 0.00 231.45 0.00 141.37 0.00 51.88 0.00 697.46
PIA- Foundation for Ecological Security Project Manager, WCDC
P.S Sojat, District Pali WD&SC District, Pali
SignatureSignature
Sl no. Activity UnitUnit
costQuantity
Converge
nce Fund
APrepratory Phase Activities
Capacity building training & EPAPhy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin
1 Administration 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1.1 Watershed committee 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1.2 Project Implementing Agency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub Total ( 1a+1b) 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 Monitoring 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2.1 Monitoring by SLNA 20% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2.2 Monitoring by DWDU 20% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2.3 Monitoring by PIA 60% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub Total (2.1+2.2+2.3) 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 Evaluation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 Entry point activity No. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 Capacity building No. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5.1WC Committee
(POP/CLAY/WOOD/Plastic)0.150 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5.2 Wall Painting 0.3 sqm 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5.3 Success story/Documentation 0.2 No. 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5.4 Demonstration 0.15 No. 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5.5 Kalajatha/puppet show No 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5.6 Chetna Rally/Night Meeting 0.2 No. 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5.7Institution Trainning cum Awarness
programme2.0 No 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5.8 Exposure visit inter State 1.0 No 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5.9 Exposure visit intra state 1.0 No 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub Total (
5.1+5.2+5.3+5.4+5.5+5.6+5.7+5.8+5.9
)
0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Chapter V (B)
Annual Action Plan through Convergence
Project area: 4650 Ha
Through Convergence: 48.84 lac
Project name: Pali IWMP-23/11-12
Convergence Plan of IWMP 23/11-12
Block-Sojat
District-Pali
Total2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017
6 Detail project report preparation No. 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total (A) 1+2+3+4+5+6 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B Natural resource management 0.00 0.00
1Conservation measures for arable
land 11.09
1.1 Earthen bund Ha. 0.116 50.00 5.776 0 0 16.6667 1.9253 16.7 1.93 16.7 1.93 0 0 50 5.776
1.2 Farmbunding with Neem Plantation Ha. 0.198 0.00 0.000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1.3 Farm pond No. 0.802 5.00 4.008 0 0 1.66667 1.3362 1.67 1.34 1.67 1.34 0 0 5 4.00845
SubTotal(B) 1.1 to 1.6 0 9.78 0 0 0 3.2615 0 3.26 0 3.26 0 0 0 9.78445
2.1 Pasture Development Work Ha. 0.314 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2.2 Dugout Pond Ha. 0.938 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2.3 Low cost drop structure Ha. 0.99 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2.4 CCT (Continuous Contour Trench) Ha. 0.064 50.00 3.20 0 0 16.6667 1.0667 16.7 1.07 16.7 1.07 0 0 50 3.2
SubTotal(B) 2.1 to 2.6 0 0.00 0 0 0 1.0667 0 1.07 0 1.07 0 0 0 3.2
Drainage line Treatement 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3.2 LSCD (Loose Stone Check Dam) No. 0.152 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3.3 Anicut No. 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3.4 WHS (Anicut Repair) No. 0.690 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3.9 Gabion No. 1.377 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub Total ( B) 3.1 to 3.9 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grand Total ( B) 1+2+3 0 0.00 0 0 0 4.3282 0 4.33 0 4.33 0 0 0 12.9845
C Production system 0.00 0.00
1 Production measure for Arable land 0.86 0 0 0 0.2857 0 0.29 0 0.29 0 0 0 0.85716
1.1 Agro forestry (Karunda, aloevera) Ha. 0.2066 11.09 2.291 0 0 3.70 0.7637 3.7 0.76 3.7 0.76 0 0 11.09 2.29104
1.2Crop demonstration (Rabi and Kharif)
Ha. 0.0215 485.20 10.43 0 0 161.735 3.4773 162 3.48 162 3.48 0 0 485.2 10.4319
1.3 Vegetable Kit (kitchen garden) Ha. 0.173 0.19 0.032 0 0 0.06243 0.0108 0.06 0.01 0.06 0.01 0 0 0.187 0.0324
1.4 Fodder demonstration Ha. 0.01 34.50 0.345 0 0 11.5 0.115 11.5 0.12 11.5 0.12 0 0 34.5 0.345
1.5 Sprinkler No. 0.23 3.00 0.69 0 0 1 0.23 1 0.23 1 0.23 0 0 3 0.69
1.6 Pipeline No. 0.12 15.00 1.80 0 0 5 0.6 5 0.6 5 0.6 0 0 15 1.8
Sub Total C ( 1.1+1.6) 0 4.19 0 0 0 5.4825 0 5.48 0 5.48 0 0 0 15.5903
2 Animal Husbandry and Production
2.1 Animals camp No. 0.24 15.00 3.60 0 0 5 1.2 5 1.2 5 1.2 0 0 15 3.6
2.2 Artificial Insemination No. 0.0015 150.00 0.225 0 0 50 0.075 50 0.08 50 0.08 0 0 150 0.225
2.3 Goatry (Sirohi Breed) No. 0.0635 150.00 9.525 0 0 50 3.175 50 3.18 50 3.18 0 0 150 9.525
2.4Bull/B (Breed Improvement by Natural
service)No. 0.7 6.00 4.20 0 0 2 1.4 2 1.4 2 1.4 0 0 6 4.2
2.5 Animals Fodder Feed Vessel No. 0.01 120.00 1.20 0 0 40 0.4 40 0.4 40 0.4 0 0 120 1.2
Sub Total C ( 2.1+2.4) 1.02 0 18.75 0 0 0 6.25 0 6.25 0 6.25 0 0 0 18.75
3 Energy conservation
3.1 Biogas (3cum) No. 0.25 6.00 1.50 0 0 2 0.5 2 0.5 2 0.5 0 0 6 1.5
Sub Total C ( 3.1) 0.00 1.50 0 0 0 0.5 0 0.5 0 0.5 0 0 0 1.5
Sub Total C ( 1+2+3) 0 0.00 0 0 0 12.232 0 12.2 0 12.2 0 0 0.0 35.8403
D Livelihood support 0.00
1.1 Revolving fund to SHG (60% of 9%) 0.25 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1.2Revolving Fund to Enterprising
Individual 10% of 9%)No. 0.25 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1.3Grand to Aid to enterprising SHG or
Federation of SHG (Max30 % of 9%)No. 2.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
No. 4.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
E Consolidation Phase
1.1 Consolidation Phase No. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub- Total E 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grand Total ( A+B+C+D+E) 0.00 0 48.82 0 0 0 16.56 0 16.6 0 16.6 0 0 0 48.82
Signature
PIA- Foundation for Ecological Security Project Manager, WCDC
P.S Sojat, District Pali WD&SC District, Pali
Signature
CHAPTER VI
CHAPTER – VI EXPECTED OUTCOMES 1 2 3 4 5 6
S. No. Item Unit of
measurement Pre-project Status(Feet)
Expected Post-project Status
Remarks
1 Status of water table (Depth to Ground water level)
(Feet) 80-100 (Feet) 50-70 (Feet)
2 Ground water structures repaired/ rejuvenated
No. 1 2
3 Quality of drinking water Description Sweet & Floride Sweet
4 Availability of drinking water Description 60416 Lit. 90624
5 Change in irrigated Area Ha 161 170
6 Change in cropping/ land use pattern
Description Agricultural have been central to the livelihood of the people living in this area with 62 % of the household stating as a being most depend on agriculture With the vary land holding and subject to vagaries of nature agriculture remains high risk low input low output activity .The nature of Agriculture and farming practices is also strongly conditioned by the availability of water .
As a part of the arable land treatment work activities such as farm bund and farm pond have been planned for the in-situ conservation of water. These would enhance the soil moisture in the farm land .the symbiotic relation between agriculture and livestock rearing and the critical role played by animal husbandry particularly during drought years in the context of mixed farming system cannot be negated.
7 Area under agricultural crop Ha 3099.22 3099.22
I Area under single crop
Ha 3099.22 3099.22
Ii Area under double crop
Ha 163.12 200
Iii Area under multiple crop
Ha - 5-8 Ha
8 Change in cultivated Area Ha
9 yield of
major crops
of area
Yield of Bajra q/ha 16 q / Ha 20 q/ Ha
Yield of Wheat q/ha
Yield of Gram q/ha
Yield of Mustard q/ha
10 production of major crops
of area
Production of Bajra Ton 886.4 t / Ha 930 t/ Ha
Production of Wheat Ton 250 T/Ha 265 t/ Ha
Production of Gram Ton
Production of Mustard Ton
11 Area under vegetation Ha 649 Ha 681 Ha
12 Area under horticulture Ha 0 Ha Ha
13 Area under fuel Ha 828 Ha 828 Ha
14 Area under Fodder Ha 4090 Ha Kharif & Rabi Crop, pasture land
4252 Ha Kharif , Rabi Crop, Pastureland,
wasterland
15 Fodder production Q 7246 MT/ Year 15837 MT/ Year
16 Milk production Litres/day 6-8 Lit / Day 8-10 Lit /Day
17 SHGs Active No. 6 SHG 144 SHG
18 No. of livelihoods No. - -
19 Income Rs.in lak 0.25-0.8 0.3-1.00
20 Migration No. 319 Person 250 Person
21 SHG Federations formed No. - 16 Federation will be Formed .
CHAPTER VII
:-
:-
:-
:-
=
1 Catch ment Area = 150 Ha.
2 Maxmium Rain fall intencity = 8 cm./hr.
3 General nature of catchment Area
a. Agricultural land = 300
b. Pasture Land = 120 Ha.
4 Height of crest above G.L. = 1.4 M.
5 Flood lift = 0.45
6 Free board = 0.5
7 Top width of Head wall = 0.7
8 Bottom width of Head wall = 2.50
9 Width of concrete Bed = 2.50
10 Length of crest = 20 M.
11 Percentage slope of land = 0.5
12 No. of well benifited = 0
13 Cost of Project = 547000.00
a. Labour component = 179000.00
b. Material component = 368000.00
c. Contingency = 15905
Basic Data of Project
Panchayat Khariyaniv
Name of Site Bhutiya Nala
Type of Structure R.R.Stone masonary structure with Earthen bund
Sojat IWMP 23 watershedTehsil - Sojat, District - Pali, State: Rajasthan, India
Dimension for Construction & Costing
Name of Village Khariyaniv
…
150 Ha.
8 Cm/hr
Agricultural land 300
120
Height of crest above G.L. 1.4
Length of crest 20
0.5
0
0
S.C. 0
S.T. 0
Others 0
Total 0
S.C. 0
S.T. 0
Others 0
Total 0
Circle Pali
No of farmer benefited
Area to be benefited
Catchment Area
Maxmium Rainfall intensity
General nature of catchment Area
Pasture Land
Percentage slope of land
No. of well benefited
:-
:-
A.
I Available crest length 20 M
ii Total catchment Area 150 Ha. As per G.T.Sheet
iii Peak Runoff Rate
a By Rational MethodQp = 0.0276 CIA
C= Coefficient of runoff 0.3
K = L3/2
/H1/2
I= Intensity of rain fall in cm/hr. 8
K = 8150.47 A= Catchment Area in Ha. 150
Tc = 0.0195K0.77
L=Maxmium length of travel by runoff water in m. 810
Tc = 20.03 H= Difference in elevation between most remote 8
point and and outlet point in meterQp= 0.0276 0.30 X 8 X 150
Qp = 9.94
b
Q = 1.71Lh3/2
9.94 = 1.71 20 h3/2
h 0.44
Say h= 0.45
3 hw= Wave height in meter
Fb= 1.5hw Df= Fetch length in meter 550 Meter.
1.5X0.014(Df)1/2
Fb= 0.49
Say Fb= 0.5
Design calculation of Anicut
Use when catchment is <1300Ha.
Q=Run off in m3/sec.
By weir formula
Free Board
Sojat IWMP 23 watershed
Tehsil - Sojat, District – Pali, State: Rajasthan, India
Name of Village Khariyaniv
Name of Site Bhutiya Nala
B.
1 Head wall
a Height of Head wall H= 1.4
b Top width( Tw) = h P= Sp.ht. Of masonary 2.3
(P-1)1/2
Tw= 0.39
Top width= 0.7
C. Bottom width Bw Tw+0.8H
1.82
So Bottom Width= 2.50 Meter
2 Head wall extension
a Length= H+h+1+Fb
1.4 + 0.45 + 1 + = 2.85 Meter
= 4
b Height of Head Extensionwall = H+h+Fb
1.4 + 0.5 + 0.5 = 2.4 Meter
c Top width 0.6 Meter
d Bottom Width= 0.5(H+h) = 0.5( 1.4 + 0.5 )= 0.93 Meter
3 Side wall
a Length= 1.75H+0.75h+0.45 = 3.238
But as per site condition= 4.0 Meter
b Height:
At H.W.End= H+h+Fb 1.4 + 0.5 + 0.5 = 2.4 Meter
At W.W.End= h+fb = 0.45 + 0.5 = 1.0 Meter
c Top width= 0.6 Meter
d Bottom width=
At H.W.End= 0.6+0.4(H+h) 1.3 Meter
At W.W.End= 0.6+0.4(1.5h) 0.9 Meter
But taken as= 1 Meter
4 Wing wall
a Height h+Fb 0.45 + 0.5 = 1.0 Meter
b Length= 2.25h 2.25 X 0.5 = 1.01 Meter Say 2
c Top width 0.6 Meter
Bottom width of wing wall 0.9 Meter
5 Apron
a Length= 20 Meter
b Width= H+h+Fb 1.4 + 0.5 + 0.5 2.4 Meter Say 3.5
c Thickness 0.8 Meter
6 Toe wall
a Length= 20 Meter
b Width= 0.5 Meter
c Height= 0.5 Meter
Bw=
But as per site condition
contd..
STRUCTURAL DESGIN
C= Coefficient of runoff 0.3
I= Intensity of rain fall in cm/hr. 8
A= Catchment Area in Ha. 150
L=Maxmium length of travel by runoff water in m. 810
H= Difference in elevation between most remote 8
point and and outlet point in meter
h= Head over the crest in mtr. 0.44 0.5
Df= Fetch length in meter 550
Fb =Free board 0.49 0.5
Top width Tw= 0.39 0.7
Height of cerst 1.4
Bottom Width of Head wall Bw 1.8 2
Lenth of Head wall extension= 2.85 5
Length of side wall= 3.24 5
Bottom Width of Side wall 1.3
0.9
Length of wing wall 2.00 2
:-:-
FREE BODY DIAGRAM
a= 0.7b= 2.50H= 1.4h= 0.45
a
H
bb/3 2b/3
cw(H+H)
Specific Wt. Of masonary P = 2.3 T/m3
Specific Wt. of water w = 1 T/m3
Cofficient of uplift pressure c = 0.6cofficient of friction atbed surface and creep length = 0.75Weight of Dam-: =Weight of Dam-:
W1= aHPW1= T 2.254 T
b-a 2.898 T2
W= W1+W2= 2.254 + 2.898 = 5.152 T
Water pressureAt Depth h= P1 = wh = 1 X 0.45 = 0.45 T/m
2
At Depth H+h= P2 = w(H+h) =1( 1.40 + 0.45 ) = 1.9 T/m
2
Force aching due to water pressure I.e. Net horizontal
Water force P1+ P2 2 = 1.61 T/m
2
Horizontal water pressure at depth h =Fa= wHh= = 0.63 TAt depth H+h = Fb= P2-P1 = 0.98 T
2Force due to water column at crest F3 = wha= = 0.315 T
Up lift pressure U = 1/2 cwb (H+h) = 1.3875 T
W2= HP=
P= H=
H
Sojat IWMP 23 watershedTehsil - Sojat, District – Pali, State: Rajasthan, India
Name of Village KhariyanivName of Site Bhutiya Nala
W(H+h)
X
W1W2
U
fa
H/3
fbH/3
:-
:-
1 Safety against over turning
Over turning moment Mo = H H 22 3 3
1.4 1.4 22 3 3
Mo= 3.2108Restoring Moment Mr = W1 (b-a/2) + W2 (b-a)2/3 + F3 (b-a/2)
Mr=Mr= 4.8461 + 3.478 + 0.677 = 9
Mr 9.001Mo 3.2108
Structure is safe against over turning
2 Safety against Rupture from tension
Net Vertical Pressure V = W1+W2+F3-U2.254 + 2.898 + 0.315 - 1.388 = 4.08
Position of resultant where it cut the baseExcess moment(Mr-Mo) 9.001 - 3.211
4.08
TRUE
3 Safety against crusing
Eccentricity e = b/2-X-0.169
Crusting stress at the toe of theHead wallPc= V (1+_6e/b)
bPc= 0.968688Pc<<20 Hence it is safe
4 Safety against sliding
Net vertical Force V= 4.0795 TRestorin force = uV = 0.78 X 4.0795 (u=0.65 to 0.75)
3.1860895 TSliding force Net horizontal force= Fa+Fb
0.63 + 0.98 = 1.61 TFactor of safety = Restoring force 3.186
Sliding force 1.61
Hence it is safe
= 1.42Net vertical force
== 1.979 >1.3 Hence
Factor of safety = 2.803 >1.5 Hence
X= =
0.63 + 0.980 + 1.39 2.50
Bhutiya Nala
STABILITY CHECKS
Fa + Fb + u b
Sojat IWMP 23 Watershed 0Tehsil - Sojat, District – Pali, State: Rajasthan, India
Name of Village KhariyanivName of Site
:-
:-
A
c
4 20.0 4
H.W.Ext. 1
H.W.
1.0
S.W.
0.6
5.0 B
3.5
APRON
1.0
2 T.W. 0.5
Bhutiya Nala
0.7
1.80
Sojat IWMP 23 watershed
Tehsil - Sojat, District – Pali, State: Rajasthan, India
PLAN AND SECTION OF ANICUT
Name of Village Khariyaniv
Name of Site
0.6W
.W.
BW
.W
BPLAN
0.95
1.0
1.4
0.7
2
0.6
1.5
SECTION ON A-A'
2.35
Sojat IWMP 23 watershed
Tehsil - Sojat, District – Pali, State: Rajasthan, India
3.5
:-:-
General features of Silt Retention Structure-:1.4 M.20 M.
1.5 M. 2.0 M.2.0 M. 1.0 M.0.7 M. 0.9 M.4.0 M. 0.9 M.2.4 M. 0.50 M.0.6 M. 0.50 M.1.0 M. 1.0 M.2.0 M. 0.8 M.4.0 M. 2.4 M.
1.00 M.1.0 M.1.5 M.
S.No. No L B H1
Total
2
40 X 7.0 = 280 Sqm.
3
Total Cum.
4
05
Total
Berm
Cutting0.00
Cum.
H.W. 1 X 20 X 2.2 X 1.5 = 66.00
H.W.Ext 2 X 4.0 X 1.0 X 2.4 = 18.80 Cum.
S.W. 2 X 4.0 X 1.00 X 2.5 = 19.60 Cum.
W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 0.9 X 2.45 = 8.82 Cum.
Apron 1 X 20 X 2.4 X 0.80 = 37.60 Cum.
T.W. 1 X 20 X 0.50 X 1.0 = 10.00 Cum.
Total 160.821 Execavation in Hard soil 20% 32.162 Execavation in Murrum 40% 64.33
3 Execavation in DIR 40% 64.33
6
H.W. 1 X 20.0 X 2.2 X 0.3 = 13.20 Cum.
H.W.Ext 2 X 4 X 1.0 X 0.3 = 2.40 Cum.
S.W. 2 X 4 X 1.00 X 0.3 = 2.40 Cum.
W.W. 2 X 2 X 0.9 X 0.3 = 1.08 Cum.
Apron 1 X 20.0 X 2.4 X 0.3 = 14.10 Cum.T.W. 1 X 20.0 X 0.50 X 0.3 = 3.00 Cum.
Total 36.18
Earth work excavation for foundation in dry or
moist soil including ramming of bottom
scrapping of sides dipodal of soil intial lift up to
1.5 m and lead up to 30M( As per item no. 2(c)
page 6 of G.K.N.2013-14 BSR of Pali)
Providing and laying of cement concrete well
mixed in cement mortar 1:4:8 laying in position
complete excluding curing with maxmium size
of aggregate up to 50 mm. ( As per item no. 11-
1 a page 7 of G.K.N.2013-14 BSR of Pali)
Item Quantity
Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep
Cutting and clearing of ordinary jungle
includling bushes shrubs and disposal as per
instructrion of engineer incharge( As per item
no. 1 page 6 of G.K.N.2013-14 BSR of Pali)
Benching of the base and depositing the
execavated material for bund dressing etc. all
components
Earth work filling behind foundation dry or
moist soil including laying in layer of 15cm.
Breaking of clods dressing to require profile
with manual compaction including intial lift up
to 1.5 m and lead up to 50M.
Bottom Width of S.W.Height of side wall at W.W.End=
Depth of foundation for side wall =
Bottom width for H.W.Ext. Depth of foundation for Toe wall =Depth of foundation for H.W.Ext .= Thickness of Apron=
Length of side wall= Width of Apron =
Length of H.W.Ext = Depth of foundation for Wing wall =Height of H.W.Ext. at H.W. = Height of Toewall=
Top Width of H.W.Ext.= Top & Bopttom width of Toe wall=
Depth of foundation for H.W. = Length of wing wall=Bottom width of H.W. = Height of Wing wall=
Top of H.W = Bopttom width of Wing wall=
Bhutiya Nala
Height of crest=Length of Crest
Sojat IWMP 23 watershed
Tehsil - Sojat, District – Pali, State: Rajasthan, India
DETAILED ESTIMATE OF Anicut
Name of Village KhariyanivName of Site
Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep
7
H.W. 1 X 20.0 X 2.0 X 1.2 = 48.00 Cum.
H.W.Ext 2 X 4.0 X 1.0 X 1.7 = 13.60 Cum.
S.W. 2 X 4.0 X 1.00 X 1.2 = 9.60 Cum.
W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 0.9 X 0.6 = 2.16 Cum.
T.W. 1 X 20.0 X 0.35 X 0.7 = 4.90 Cum.
Total 78.26 Cum.
8
H.W. 1 X 20.0 X 1.4 X 1.4 = 37.80 Cum.
H.W.Ext 2 X 4.0 X 0.8 X 2.4 = 15.04 Cum.
S.W. 2 X 4.0 X 0.8 X 1.65 = 10.56 Cum.
W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 0.9 X 1.0 = 3.42 Cum.
T.W. 1 X 20.0 X 0.50 X 0.50 = 5.00 Cum.
Total 71.82 Cum.
9
Apron 1 X 20.0 X 2.4 X 0.50 23.50 Cum.
Total 23.50 Cum.
10
H.W. 1 X 20.0 X 0.7 X 0.1 = 1.40 Cum.
H.W.Ext 2 X 4.0 X 0.6 X 0.1 = 0.48 Cum.
S.W. 2 X 4.0 X 0.6 X 0.07 = 0.34 Cum.
W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 0.9 X 0.07 = 0.25 Cum.
T.W. 1 X 20.0 X 0.50 X 0.1 = 1.00 Cum.
Apron 1 X 20.0 X 2.35 X 0.1 = 4.70 Cum.
Total 8.17 Cum.
11H.W. 0 X 20.0 X 1.9 = 0.00 Sqm.
Total 0.00 Sqm.
12
H.W. 1 X 20.0 X 3.6 = 72.00H.W. 1 x 12.0 x 1.5 = 18.00H.W. 1 x 12.0 x 1.3 = 15.60H.W.Ext. 4 X 4.0 X 0.5 = 8.00H.W.Ext. 2 X 5.0 X 0.6 = 6.00S.W. 2 X 4.0 X 2.3 = 18.00W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 1.6 = 6.20
T.W. 2 X 20.0 X 0.5 = 20.00
13 Total = 163.80E. work 1 40 6.0 2.5 600.00 Cum.
14 S. Pitching 1 40 5.5 0.2 50.6 Cum.
Flush pointing in cement motar (1:3)
20 m.m thick plastering on new surface in
cement mortar (1:4)( As per item no.66 (b)
page 8 of G.K.N.2013-14 BSR of Pali)
Earth work for embankment on two side of the
proposed structure including transportation,
compaction etc. Complete (As per item no.
5,page no. 6 of G.K.N. 2013-14 BSR of Pali)
Dry stone pitching of Hammer dressed witch
packing of voids of small stone including all lifts
in require profile (23 cm depth)( As per item no.
98 page 16 of G.K.N.2013-14 BSR of Pali)
Random rubble stone masonary for foundation
& plinth cement sand mortar(1:6) for Silt
Retention Structure( As per item no. 24 a page
8 of G.K.N.2013-14 BSR of Pali)
Random rubble stone masonary for Super
Structure cement sand mortar(1:6) for Silt
Retention Structure( As per item no. 25 page
8 of G.K.N.2013-14 BSR of Pali)
Random rubble stone masonary for Apron
cement sand mortar(1:6) for Silt Retention
Structure( As per item no. 25 page 8 of
G.K.N.2013-14 BSR of Pali)Providing and laying of cement concrete well
mixed in cement mortar 1:2:4 laying in position
complete excluding curing with maxmium size
of aggregate up to 12 mm etc. complete ( As
per item no. 121 a page 15 of G.K.N.2013-14
BSR of Pali)
Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep
Height of crest= 1.4
Thickness of C.C. in (1:4:8) 0.3 M.
Length of Crest 20 M.
Depth of foundation for H.W. = 2.0 M
Bottom width of H.W. = 2.0 M
Top of H.W = 0.7 M
Length of H.W.Ext = 4.0 M
Height of H.W.Ext. at H.W. = 2.4 M
Top Width of H.W.Ext.= 0.6 M
Bottom width for H.W.Ext. 0.9 M
Depth of foundation for H.W.Ext.= 1.2 M
Length of side wall= 4.0 M
Bottom Width of S.W. 1.0 M
Height of side wall at W.W.End= 1.0 M
Depth of foundation for side wall = 2.5 M
Length of wing wall= 2.0 M
Height of Wing wall= 1.0 M
Bopttom width of Wing wall= 0.9 M
Depth of foundation for Wing wall = 1.9 M
Height of Toewall= 0.50 M
Top & Bopttom width of Toe wall= 0.5 M
Depth of foundation for Toe wall = 0.9 M
Thickness of Apron= 0.8 M
Width of Apron = 2.4 M
:-:-
Quatity UnitLabour Total Labour cost Total Cost
1
0.00 Cum. 1.00 1.00 0.00 02
280 Sqm. 4.50 4.50 1260.00 12603
0 Cum. 77.60 85.00 0.00 04
0 Cum. 81.50 85.00 0.00 05
160.82 Cum. 0
32.16 Cum. 93.00 93.00 2991.25 2991.252
64.33 Cum. 113.00 113.00 7269.06 7269.064
64.33 Cum. 165.00 165.00 10614.12 10614.126
36.18 Cum. 403.08 1937 14583.43 70080.66
7
78.26 Cum. 583.85 2008 45692.10 157146.088
71.82 Cum. 583.85 2008 41932.11 144214.569
23.50 Cum. 583.85 2008 13720.48 4718810
8.17 Cum. 405.53 3006 3312.37 24553.008
11 0.00 Sqm. 24.2 0 0.00 0
12
163.80 Sqm. 56.26 117 9215.39 19164.6
13
600.00 Cum. 41.5 45.2 24900.00 2712014
50.60 Cum. 49.8 367 2519.88 18570.2Total 178010.1904 530171.544Contingency 3% 15905.15
TOTAL 178010.1904 546076.6903Say total Cost 547000.0
Labour cost 179000.0Meterial cost 368000.0
Providing and laying of cement concrete well mixed
in cement mortar 1:2:4 laying in position complete
excluding curing with maxmium size of aggregate
up to 12 mm etc. complete ( As per item no. 121 a
page 15 of G.K.N.2013-14 BSR of Pali)
Flush pointing in cement motar (1:3)
20 m.m thick plastering on new surface in cement
mortar (1:4)( As per item no.66 (b) page 8 of
G.K.N.2013-14 BSR of Pali)Earth work for embankment on two side of the
proposed structure including transportation,
compaction etc. Complete(As per item no. 5,page
no. 6 of G.K.N. 2013-14 BSR of Pali)Dry stone pitching of Hammer dressed witch
packing of voids of small stone including all lifts in
require profile (23 cm depth)( As per item no. 98
page 16 of G.K.N.2013-14 BSR of Pali)
Execavation in Murrum
Execavation in DIR
Providing and laying of cement concrete well mixed
in cement mortar 1:4:8 laying in position complete
excluding curing with maxmium size of aggregate
up to 50 mm. ( As per item no. 11-1 a page 7 of
G.K.N.2013-14 BSR of Pali)
Random rubble stone masonary for foundation &
plinth cement sand mortar(1:6) for Silt Retention
Structure( As per item no. 24 a page 8 of
G.K.N.2013-14 BSR of Pali)
Random rubble stone masonary for Super
Structure cement sand mortar(1:6) for Silt
Retention Structure( As per item no. 25 page 8 of
Random rubble stone masonary for Apron cement
sand mortar(1:6) for Silt Retention Structure( As
per item no. 25 page 8 of G.K.N.2013-14 BSR of
Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep
Cutting and clearing of ordinary jungle includling
bushes shrubs and disposal as per instructrion of
engineer incharge( As per item no. 1 page 6 of
G.K.N.2013-14 BSR of Pali)
Benching of the base and depositing the
execavated material for bund dressing etc. all
componentsEarth work filling behind foundation dry or moist
soil including laying in layer of 15cm. Breaking of
clods dressing to require profile with manual
compaction including intial lift up to 1.5 m and lead
up to 50M.Earth work excavation for foundation in dry or
moist soil including ramming of bottom scrapping of
sides dipodal of soil intial lift up to 1.5 m and lead
up to 30M( As per item no. 2(c) page 6 of
G.K.N.2013-14 BSR of Pali)
Execavation in Hard soil
Name of Site Bhutiya Nala
S.No.Item Rate Amount
Sojat IWMP 23 watershed
Tehsil - Mandalgarh, District - Bhilwara, State: Rajasthan, India
Abstract of Cost of Silt Retention Structure
Name of Village Khariyaniv
Quantity Cement Sand Aggrigate StoneCum / Sqm Begs Cum Cum Cum
1 Cement Concrete (1:4:8) 36.180 115.78 17.00 34.01 _2 Plaster in C.C. (1:4) 163.800 27.85 5.24 _ _3 Massonary in Cement 150.080 210.11 64.23 _ 165.094 Pointing in Cement 0.000 0.00 0.00 _ _5 Stone Kharanja in cement mortar (1:6) 23.500 32.9 8.8125 _ 28.26 Cement concrete coping(1:2:4) 8.17 47.70 3.68 7.357 Dry Stone Pitching 50.600 _ _ _ 55.66
TOTAL 434.34 98.97 41.36 248.95 Say Bags 435
or 21.75 MT.
1 Cement 21.75 MT.2 Sand 98.97 Cum.3 Stones 248.95 Cum.4 Aggregates 41.36 Cum.
S.No. ITEM
Sojat IWMP 23 watershed
Tehsil - Sojat, District – Pali, State: Rajasthan, India
Material Statement
Name of Village :- KhariyanivName of Site :- Bhutiya Nala
dug out pond
Sr.no. Item No. Length mt Width in mt Ht./Depth in mt Quantity cum
L Rate T Rate L Amount T Amount
1
Excavation of earth work in
foundation 1.5 m depth & lead up to
50 m for I st step 1 20 20 0.9 360 93 93 33480 33480
In soft soil
As per BSR 2013-14 page no. 6
item no. 2
2 II nd step 1 17 17 0.6 173.4 113 113 19594.2 19594.2
Hard soli
3 II rd step 1 14 14 0.9 176.4 165 165 29106 29106
Muram soil
4 Add 1.5 m lift extra 1 14 14 0.9 176.4 13 13 2293.2 2293.2
As per BSR 2013-14 page no. 6
item no. 3
5
Clay soil filling & compaction in
bottom of pond 1 14 14 0.2 39.2 45.2 45.2 1771.84 1771.84
As per BSR 2013-14 page no. 6
item no 5
6
Transportation up to 10 km for clay
soil 1 14 14 0.2 39.2 122.2 4790.24
As per BSR 2013-14 page no. 18
item no. 103
Total 86245.24 91035.48
2587.357 2731.0644
88832.597
4933.9472
93766.544
1.5
17
1.5
1.5 14 14 20
17
20
Plan.
20
1:1^ 1:1^ 2.4 mt
14
Section
Add 3 % of contangancy
Labour amount
Material amouint
Grant total
Modal Estimate.Detail estimate of Earthen Dug out pound
Th.- Sojat, Dist. - Pali, State – Rajasthan
Capacity – 74000 lt.
Rate Amount
Page 1
Sheet19
MODAL ESTIMATE
Name of site :- Plot no. -Agri. Land
Name of Work :- Farm Bunding with Neem Plantation
1.00 Ha. Area for farm bunding, Size of bunds 0.6 Bund height verry b/w 0.3 Mt. To 0.8 Mt. Av. Height will be 0.6 Mt.
80.00 MM / hr. rainfall intensity of area 0.5 Hr. duration 300.00 mm Av. annual rainfall
2.00 Mt. Elevation diff. between two contours. 1 :1 H:V Bund slope 5.0% Av. slop of plot - Agri. 3.3
5.0 Years life of bund. 2.0 Mt./100 mt. Outlet 2.0 Vegetative cover - medium
8.0 Times this incidence can be repeated. 1.45 Tons bulk dencity of soil/cum 4.0 Soil type – Sandy Murum
0.5 :1 H :V Slope of stone outlet Size 0.5 mt. Height 0.3 mt. Top width Bund & Outlet
0.54 Sqm cross section area of trench 19.8% Runoff coefficient
0.28 Sqm cross section area of trench 235.9% Runoff arrested
40.0 Mt. Horizontal diff. contour to contour interval. 79.2 Cum. Yield of water in this plot in one time.
207.0 RMT Bund Length required in one ha. of land. 187 Cum. water recharge in this plot in one time.
6.0 Mt. water spred in field 1495 Cum. water recharge in this plot during first year.
74.7 Cum. Soil conserved by this plot. 3736.8 Cum. water recharge in this plot in trench life.
108 Tons soil conserved in this plot. 40.0 Mt slingth leangth . 1.08 mm. Sheet erosion/year
S.no Particular Unit Quantity Rate Amount Remarks
1 As per BSR 2013 page no -26, item no-186
Dug belling work up to 5 to 7 cm depth for
bunding.
2 As per BSR 2013 page no.- 6 item no. 2a
Earth work in hard soil for construction of bund
including ramming compaction and dressing up
to the lead of 50 m and lift 1.5 m.
3 As per BSR 2013 page no -1 iAnexture -1
Providing stone out let for disposal of excess
water.As per BSR 2013-14 page no -19,item no. 110 a
Pit digging in soft soil of size 45x45x45 Cm.
Treatment of pit by FYM.
Cost of saplings As per BSR 2013-14 page no -19,item no. 111 b
Plantation work
Transportation Cost of saplings from 10 km
distance.
As per BSR 2013-14 page no -19,item no. 115 b
Ring making of 0.5 Mt. Radius & 30 Cm. width X
20 Cm. Depth.
As per BSR 2013-14 page no -19,item no. 113
10 Transportation of plant by labour up to 1 km per plant 40 0.83 33.20
11Two times watering to the plant with 15 liters per
plant. per plant 40 2.20 88.00
Transportation Cost of water from 2 km distance.
Total cost of Field Bunding with stone outlet. Rs.19,269.35
Contingency @ 3% 578.08
Grand Total cost of Field Bunding with stone outlet. Rs.19,847.43
Per Hectare cost. Rs.19,847.43
0.6m . ,1:1
Cross sectoin-0.54 Sqm
1.5m
X SECTION OF FARM BUNDING
0.3m
1:1^
11 Per 1000 plant
Tehsil –Sojat, Distric Pali, State - Rajasthan, India
40 230.00 9.20
8 Per 1000 plant 40 745.00 29.80
9 per plant 40 2.20 88.00
7 per pit 40 3.70 148.00
6 per plant 40 15.00 600.00
5 per pit 40 0.29 11.60
4 cum 40 7.5 300.00
Cum 182.16 93 16940.88
Cum 1.13 797 900.61
.
Rmt. 207 0.58 120.06
Page 1
Sheet19
Name of site :-
Name of Work :- Farm Bunding (Earthen)
1.00 Ha. Area for farm bunding, Size of bunds 0.6 Bund height verry b/w 0.3 Mt. To 0.8 Mt. Av. Height will be 0.6 Mt.
80.00 MM / hr. rainfall intensity of area 0.5 Hr. duration 300.00 mm Av. annual rainfall
2.00 Mt. Elevation diff. between two contours. 1 :1 H:V Bund slope 5.0% Av. slop of plot - Agri. 3.3
5.0 Years life of bund. 2.0 Mt./100 mt. Outlet 2.0 Vegetative cover - medium
8.0 Times this incidence can be repeated. 1.45 Tons bulk dencity of soil/cum 4.0 Soil type – Sandy Murum
0.5 :1 H :V Slope of stone outlet Size 0.5 mt. Height 0.3 mt. Top width Bund & Outlet
0.54 Sqm cross section area of trench 19.8% Runoff coefficient
0.28 Sqm cross section area of trench 235.9% Runoff arrested
40.0 Mt. Horizontal diff. contour to contour interval. 79.2 Cum. Yield of water in this plot in one time.
207.0 RMT Bund Length required in one ha. of land. 187 Cum. water recharge in this plot in one time.
6.0 Mt. water spred in field 1495 Cum. water recharge in this plot during first year.
74.7 Cum. Soil conserved by this plot. 3736.8 Cum. water recharge in this plot in trench life.
108 Tons soil conserved in this plot. 40.0 Mt slingth leangth . 1.08 mm. Sheet erosion/year
S.no Particular Unit Quantity Rate Amount Remarks
1 As per BSR 2013 page no -26, item no-186
Dug belling work up to 5 to 7 cm depth for
bunding. Rmt. 207.00 0.58 120.06
2 As per BSR 2013 page no.- 6 item no. 2a
Earth work in hard soil for construction of bund
including ramming compaction and dressing
up to the lead of 50 m and lift 1.5 m.Cum 109.54 93.00 10187.63
6 As per BSR 2013 page no -1 iAnexture -1
Providing stone out let for disposal of excess
water.Cum 1.1385 797.00 907.38
Total cost of Field Bunding with stone outlet. Rs.11,215.07
Contingency @ 3% 336.45
Grand Total cost of Field Bunding with stone outlet. Rs.11,551.53
Per Hectare cost. Rs.11,551.53
0.6m . ,1:1
Cross sectoin-0.54 Sqm
1.5m
X SECTION OF FARM BUNDING
.
0.3m
1:1^
MODAL ESTIMATE
Plot no. -Agri. Land
Tehsil –Sojat, Distric Pali, State - Rajasthan, India
Page 1
Type of structure :- Farm Pond
S.no Particulars Measurement unit
1 Bottom Length 14 metres
2 Bottom width 14 metres
3 Top Length 17 metres
4 Top width 17 metres
5 Depth 2.5 metres
6 Side slope(V:H) 1.7 :1
S.no Particulars Measurement unit
1 Average length 15.5 metres
2 Average width 15.5 metres
3 Depth 2.5 metres
4 Volume 600.625 Cum
S.no Percentage Length Width Depth Volume unit
1 100% 17 17 289.00 Sqm
2 100% 15.5 15.5 2.5 600.63 Cum
A 40% 240.25 Cum
B 30% 180.19 Cum
C 30% 180.19 Cum
S.no Volume Rate Cost
1 289.00 4.50 1300.50 ( BSR 2013- page-6,item-3)
2 180.19 93.00 16757.44 ( BSR 2013- page-6,item-2(a)
3 240.25 113.00 27148.25 ( BSR 2013- page-6,item-2 (b)
4 180.19 165.00 29730.94 ( BSR 2013- page-6,item-2 ©
5 300.31 13.00 3904.06 ( BSR 2013- page-6,item-3)
Total Cost 78841.188
6 2344.10
Grand Total 81185.283
Costing of Dugout Pond
Quantity EstimationParticulars
Particulars Remarks
Site Clearance
Site Clearance
Excavation
Soft Soil
Hard Soil
Mouram
Excavation of Soft soil
Excavation of Hard soil
Excavation of Mouram
Lift charge
Contingency Approx @ 3%
Foundation for Ecological Security
Watershed Development (A project under Public - Privet Partnership)
Tehsil - Sojat, District -Pali, State - Rajasthan, India
Dimention for Construction & Costing of Farm Pond
Top width Bottom Width Corner A
Corner C Corner D Corner B
Plan of Dugout Pond
14 m
14 m
17 m
17
m
MODAL ESTIMATE
Type of structure :- Gabion
S.no Particulars Measerment unit
1 Length of Head Wall 15.0 metres
2 Height of Head Wall 1.0 metres
3 Top Width of Head Wall 0.7 metres
4 Bottom Width of Head Wall 2.5 metres
5 Width of Apron 2.0 metres
6 Thicknes of Apron 0.5 metres
7 Length of Side Wall 4.5 metres
8 Height of Side Wall 1.5 metres
9 Thicknes of Side Wall 0.6 metres
10 Length of Key Wall 5.0 metres
11 Total Length of Structure 26.2 metres
12 Steps (V:H) 0.4 :1
13 No. of Gabion Structures 1
S.no Particular No. Length Width H/D/T Quantity Unit
1 Excavation L Rate T Rate L Amount L Amount
As per BSR 2013-14- page no.- 6 item no. 2(b)
1.1 Below head wall and for Apron in H.S. 1 16.2 4.5 0.5 36.5
1.2 For Key in H.S. 2 5.0 0.6 0.96 5.8
Total Excavation 42.24 Cum. 113 113.00 4773.06 4773.06
2 Construction
As per BSR 2013-14- page no.- 8 item no. 21(b)
2.1 Head Wall 1 15.0 1.6 1.0 24
2.2 Below head wall and for Apron in H.S. 1 16.2 4.5 0.5 36.45
2.3 Key Wall 2 5.0 0.6 0.96 5.8
2.4 Side Wall 2 4.5 1 1.6 14.4
Quantity of boulder 80.64 Cum. 395.3 1278 31876.78 103057
3 Wire mesh
As per BSR 2013- page no.- 25 item no. 203(b) and item no32
3.1 Head Wall 3 15.0 1.0 45
3.2 Apron &Head wall foundation 2 16.2 4.5 145.8
3.3 Key Wall 2 5.0 1.05 1.5 15.75
3.4 Side Wall 2 1.5 6.0 0 18
Quantity of G.I. Wire mesh 224.55 Sqm. 20.6 115.00 4625.73 25823.25
Total Cost of 1 Gabion 41275.57 133653.56
Contingencies @ 3.0% 4009.61
Grand Total 137663.16
Diamention for Construction & Costing of Gabian Structure
Quantity & Cost Estimetion of Gabian StructureRate Amount
97.00
97.50
98.00
98.50
99.00
99.50
100.00
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Red
uce L
evel
Cummulative Length
Cross Section of Nala
Series1 Series2
MODAL ESTIMATE
Main Wall
Key Wall
15.0
4.5
Side Wall
Apron
Plan view of Gabian Structure
1.5
Key Wall Apron
Side Wall Longitudnal section of gabian Main Wall
Notes :- All Dimension Are in Metres
Detail Drwing of Gabion Structure26.2
15.0
1.0
Chain
age
Heig
ht(
m)
GL (
RL)
Longitudn
al S
ection
FR
L
GL (
RL)
Cro
ss
Section
Heig
ht
Cum
.
Dis
t.
0 0.00 100.00 99 98.0 1.0 0 0.5
2 0.5 99.50 99 97.5 1.5 204.5
4 1 99.00 99 97.6 1.4 40
6 1.70 98.30 99 97.8 1.2 60 Cross section of main wall
8 2.98 97.02 99 98.0 1.0 80
10 2.00 98.00 99 98.5 0.5 100
12 1.00 99.00 99 98.8 0.2 120
14 0.00 100.00 99 99.0 0.0 140
Notes :- All Dimension Are in Metres
0.5
4.5
Cross section of side wall
1.5
96.5
97.0
97.5
98.0
98.5
99.0
99.5
100.0
100.5
0 15 30 45 60 75 90 105 120 135 150
Red
uce L
evel
Cummulative Length
L- Section of Nala
Series1 Series2
:-
:-
FREE BODY DIAGRAM
a= 0.7b= 2.50H= 1.2h= 0.5
a
H
bb/3 2b/3
cw(H+H)
Specific Wt. Of masonary P = 2.3 T/m3
Specific Wt. of water w = 1 T/m3
Cofficient of uplift pressure c = 0.6cofficient of friction atbed surface and creep length = 0.75Weight of Dam-: =Weight of Dam-:
W1= aHPW1= T 1.932 T
b-a 2.484 T2
W= W1+W2= 1.932 + 2.484 = 4.416 T
Water pressureAt Depth h= P1 = wh = 1 X 0.5 = 0.5 T/m
2
At Depth H+h= P2 = w(H+h) =1( 1.20 + 0.5 ) = 1.7 T/m
2
Force aching due to water pressure I.e. Net horizontal
Water force P1+ P2 2 = 1.32 T/m
2
Horizontal water pressure at depth h =Fa= wHh= = 0.6 TAt depth H+h = Fb= P2-P1 = 0.72 T
2Force due to water column at crest F3 = wha= = 0.35 T
Up lift pressure U = 1/2 cwb (H+h) = 1.275 T
W2= HP=
P= H=
H
Sojat IWMP 23 watershedTehsil - Sojat, District – Pali, State: Rajasthan, India
Name of Village Khariyaniv
Name of Site Khaniya nala
W(H+h)
X
W1W2
U
fa
H/3
fbH/3
:-
:-
1 Safety against over turning
Over turning moment Mo = H H 22 3 3
1.2 1.2 22 3 3
Mo= 2.773Restoring Moment Mr = W1 (b-a/2) + W2 (b-a)2/3 + F3 (b-a/2)
Mr=Mr= 4.1538 + 2.981 + 0.753 = 7.89
Mr 7.8871Mo 2.773
Structure is safe against over turning
2 Safety against Rupture from tension
Net Vertical Pressure V = W1+W2+F3-U1.932 + 2.484 + 0.35 - 1.275 = 3.491
Position of resultant where it cut the baseExcess moment(Mr-Mo) 7.887 - 2.773
3.491
TRUE
3 Safety against crusing
Eccentricity e = b/2-X-0.215
Crusting stress at the toe of theHead wallPc= V (1+_6e/b)
bPc= 0.676064Pc<<20 Hence it is safe
4 Safety against sliding
Net vertical Force V= 3.491 TRestorin force = uV = 0.78 X 3.491 (u=0.65 to 0.75)
2.726471 TSliding force Net horizontal force= Fa+Fb
0.6 + 0.72 = 1.32 TFactor of safety = Restoring force 2.726
Sliding force 1.32
Hence it is safe
= 1.46Net vertical force
== 2.066 >1.3 Hence
Factor of safety = 2.844 >1.5 Hence
X= =
0.60 + 0.720 + 1.28 2.50
Khaniya nala
STABILITY CHECKS
Fa + Fb + u b
Sojat IWMP 23 Watershed 0Tehsil - Sojat, District – Pali, State: Rajasthan, India
Name of Village KhariyanivName of Site
:-
:-
A
c
4 20.0 4
0.6
H.W.Ext. H.W. 0.7
1.0
c
S.W.
0.6
4.0
3.5
APRON
1.0
2 T.W. 0.5
Khaniya nala
Sojat IWMP 23 watershed
Tehsil - Sojat, District – Pali, State: Rajasthan, India
PLAN AND SECTION OF Anicut
Name of Village Khariyaniv
Name of Site
0.6W
.W.
B W.W
PLANPLAN
2.2 Sojat IWMP 23 watershed
0.7 Tehsil - Sojat, District – Pali, State: Rajasthan, India
1.2
1.2
0.5
2.5
1.5
0.5
2
0.7
1.2
SECTION ON A-A'
2.5
1.5
2
3.5
:-:-
General features of Silt Retention Structure-:1.2 M.20 M.
1.5 M. 2.0 M.2.0 M. 1.0 M.0.7 M. 0.9 M.4.0 M. 0.9 M.2.2 M. 0.50 M.0.6 M. 0.50 M.1.0 M. 1.0 M.2.0 M. 0.8 M.4.0 M. 2.2 M.
1.00 M.1.0 M.1.5 M.
S.No. No L B H1
Total
2
40 X 7.0 = 280 Sqm.
3
Total Cum.
4
05
Total
Berm
Cutting0.00
Cum.
H.W. 1 X 20 X 2.2 X 1.5 = 66.00
H.W.Ext 2 X 4.0 X 1.0 X 2.2 = 17.60 Cum.
S.W. 2 X 4.0 X 1.00 X 2.5 = 20.00 Cum.
W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 0.9 X 2.50 = 9.00 Cum.
Apron 1 X 20 X 2.2 X 0.80 = 35.20 Cum.
T.W. 1 X 20 X 0.50 X 1.0 = 10.00 Cum.Total 157.80
1 Execavation in Hard soil 20% 31.562 Execavation in Murrum 40% 63.12
3 Execavation in DIR 40% 63.12
6
H.W. 1 X 20.0 X 2.2 X 0.3 = 13.20 Cum.
H.W.Ext 2 X 4 X 1.0 X 0.3 = 2.40 Cum.
S.W. 2 X 4 X 1.00 X 0.3 = 2.40 Cum.
W.W. 2 X 2 X 0.9 X 0.3 = 1.08 Cum.
Apron 1 X 20.0 X 2.2 X 0.3 = 13.20 Cum.T.W. 1 X 20.0 X 0.50 X 0.3 = 3.00 Cum.
Total 35.28
Earth work excavation for foundation in dry or
moist soil including ramming of bottom
scrapping of sides dipodal of soil intial lift up to
1.5 m and lead up to 30M( As per item no. 2(c)
page 6 of G.K.N.2013-14 BSR of Pali)
Providing and laying of cement concrete well
mixed in cement mortar 1:4:8 laying in position
complete excluding curing with maxmium size
of aggregate up to 50 mm. ( As per item no. 11-
1 a page 7 of G.K.N.2013-14 BSR of Pali)
Item Quantity
Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep
Cutting and clearing of ordinary jungle
includling bushes shrubs and disposal as per
instructrion of engineer incharge( As per item
no. 1 page 6 of G.K.N.2013-14 BSR of Pali)
Benching of the base and depositing the
execavated material for bund dressing etc. all
components
Earth work filling behind foundation dry or
moist soil including laying in layer of 15cm.
Breaking of clods dressing to require profile
with manual compaction including intial lift up
to 1.5 m and lead up to 50M.
Bottom Width of S.W.Height of side wall at W.W.End=
Depth of foundation for side wall =
Bottom width for H.W.Ext. Depth of foundation for Toe wall =Depth of foundation for H.W.Ext .= Thickness of Apron=
Length of side wall= Width of Apron =
Length of H.W.Ext = Depth of foundation for Wing wall =Height of H.W.Ext. at H.W. = Height of Toewall=
Top Width of H.W.Ext.= Top & Bopttom width of Toe wall=
Depth of foundation for H.W. = Length of wing wall=Bottom width of H.W. = Height of Wing wall=
Top of H.W = Bopttom width of Wing wall=
Khaniya nala
Height of crest=Length of Crest
Sojat IWMP 23 watershedTehsil - Sojat, District – Pali, State: Rajasthan, India
DETAILED ESTIMATE OF Anicut
Name of Village Khariyaniv
Name of Site
Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep
7
H.W. 1 X 20.0 X 2.0 X 1.2 = 48.00 Cum.
H.W.Ext 2 X 4.0 X 1.0 X 1.7 = 13.60 Cum.
S.W. 2 X 4.0 X 1.00 X 1.2 = 9.60 Cum.
W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 0.9 X 0.6 = 2.16 Cum.
T.W. 1 X 20.0 X 0.35 X 0.7 = 4.90 Cum.
Total 78.26 Cum.
8
H.W. 1 X 20.0 X 1.4 X 1.2 = 32.40 Cum.
H.W.Ext 2 X 4.0 X 0.8 X 2.2 = 14.08 Cum.
S.W. 2 X 4.0 X 0.8 X 1.60 = 10.24 Cum.
W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 0.9 X 1.0 = 3.60 Cum.
T.W. 1 X 20.0 X 0.50 X 0.50 = 5.00 Cum.
Total 65.32 Cum.9
Apron 1 X 20.0 X 2.2 X 0.50 22.00 Cum.
Total 22.00 Cum.
10
H.W. 1 X 20.0 X 0.7 X 0.1 = 1.40 Cum.
H.W.Ext 2 X 4.0 X 0.6 X 0.1 = 0.48 Cum.
S.W. 2 X 4.0 X 0.6 X 0.07 = 0.34 Cum.
W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 0.9 X 0.07 = 0.25 Cum.
T.W. 1 X 20.0 X 0.50 X 0.1 = 1.00 Cum.
Apron 1 X 20.0 X 2.20 X 0.1 = 4.40 Cum.Total 7.87 Cum.
11H.W. 0 X 20.0 X 1.8 = 0.00 Sqm.
Total 0.00 Sqm.
12
H.W. 1 X 20.0 X 3.6 = 72.00H.W. 1 x 12.0 x 1.5 = 18.00H.W. 1 x 12.0 x 1.3 = 15.60H.W.Ext. 4 X 4.0 X 0.5 = 8.00H.W.Ext. 2 X 5.0 X 0.6 = 6.00S.W. 2 X 4.0 X 2.2 = 17.60W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 1.6 = 6.40T.W. 2 X 20.0 X 0.5 = 20.00
Total = 163.60
13
0 ( 6 + 6 )* 0.23 0.00
2
Flush pointing in cement motar (1:3)
20 m.m thick plastering on new surface in
cement mortar (1:4)( As per item no. 66(b)
page 8 of G.K.N.2013-14 BSR of Pali)
Dry stone pitching of Hammer dressed witch
packing of voids of small stone including all
lifts in require profile (23 cm depth)
Random rubble stone masonary for foundation
& plinth cement sand mortar(1:6) for Silt
Retention Structure( As per item no. 24 a
page 8 of G.K.N.2013-14 BSR of Pali)
Random rubble stone masonary for Super
Structure cement sand mortar(1:6) for Silt
Retention Structure( As per item no. 25 page
8 of G.K.N.2013-14 BSR of Pali)
Random rubble stone masonary for Apron
cement sand mortar(1:6) for Silt Retention
Structure( As per item no. 25 page 8 of
G.K.N.2013-14 BSR of Pali)
Providing and laying of cement concrete well
mixed in cement mortar 1:2:4 laying in position
complete excluding curing with maxmium size
of aggregate up to 12 mm etc. complete ( As
per item no. 121 a page 15 of G.K.N.2013-14
BSR of Pali)
Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep
Height of crest= 1.2
Thickness of C.C. in (1:4:8) 0.3 M.
Length of Crest 20 M.
Depth of foundation for H.W. = 2.0 M
Bottom width of H.W. = 2.0 M
Top of H.W = 0.7 M
Length of H.W.Ext = 4.0 M
Height of H.W.Ext. at H.W. = 2.2 M
Top Width of H.W.Ext.= 0.6 M
Bottom width for H.W.Ext. 0.9 M
Depth of foundation for H.W.Ext.= 1.2 M
Length of side wall= 4.0 M
Bottom Width of S.W. 1.0 M
Height of side wall at W.W.End= 1.0 M
Depth of foundation for side wall = 2.5 M
Length of wing wall= 2.0 M
Height of Wing wall= 1.0 M
Bottom width of Wing wall= 0.9 M
Depth of foundation for Wing wall = 1.9 M
Height of Toewall= 0.50 M
Top & Bopttom width of Toe wall= 0.5 M
0.9 M
Thickness of Apron= 0.8 M
Width of Apron = 2.2 M
Depth of foundation for Toe wall =
:-:-
Quatity UnitLabour Total Labour cost Total Cost
1
0.00 Cum. 1.00 1.00 0.00 0
2
280 Sqm. 4.50 4.50 1260.00 12603
0 Cum. 77.60 85.00 0.00 04
0 Cum. 81.50 85.00 0.00 05
157.80 Cum. 031.56 Cum. 93.00 93.00 2935.08 2935.0863.12 Cum. 113.00 113.00 7132.56 7132.5663.12 Cum. 165.00 165.00 10414.80 10414.8
6
35.28 Cum. 403.08 1937 14220.66 68337.36
7
78.26 Cum. 583.85 2008 45692.10 157146.088
65.32 Cum. 583.85 2008 38137.08 131162.569
22.00 Cum. 583.85 2008 12844.70 4417610
7.87 Cum. 405.53 3006 3190.71 23651.208
11 0.00 Sqm. 24.2 0 0.00 0
12
163.60 Sqm. 56.26 117 9204.14 19141.213
0.00 Cum. 40.5 195 0.00 0Total 145031.8314 465356.85Contingency 3% 13960.71
TOTAL 145031.8314 479317.55Say total Cost 480000.0
Labour cost 146000.0Meterial cost 334000.0
Random rubble stone masonary for Apron cement
sand mortar(1:6) for Silt Retention Structure( As per
item no. 25 page 8 of G.K.N.2013-14 BSR of Pali)
Providing and laying of cement concrete well mixed
in cement mortar 1:2:4 laying in position complete
excluding curing with maxmium size of aggregate
up to 12 mm etc. complete ( As per item no. 121 a
page 15 of G.K.N.2013-14 BSR of Pali)
Flush pointing in cement motar (1:3))
20 m.m thick plastering on new surface in cement
mortar (1:4)( As per item no. 66(b) page 8 of
G.K.N.2013-14 BSR of Pali)
Dry stone pitching of Hammer dressed witch
packing of voids of small stone including all lifts in
require profile (23 cm depth)
Execavation in MurrumExecavation in DIR
Providing and laying of cement concrete well mixed
in cement mortar 1:4:8 laying in position complete
excluding curing with maxmium size of aggregate
up to 50 mm. ( As per item no. 11-1 a page 7 of
G.K.N.2013-14 BSR of Pali)
Random rubble stone masonary for foundation &
plinth cement sand mortar(1:6) for Silt Retention
Structure( As per item no. 24 a page 8 of
G.K.N.2013-14 BSR of Pali)
Random rubble stone masonary for Super Structure
cement sand mortar(1:6) for Silt Retention
Structure( As per item no. 25 page 8 of
G.K.N.2013-14 BSR of Pali)
Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep
Cutting and clearing of ordinary jungle includling
bushes shrubs and disposal as per instructrion of
engineer incharge( As per item no. 1 page 6 of
G.K.N.2013-14 BSR of Pali)
Benching of the base and depositing the execavated
material for bund dressing etc. all components
Earth work filling behind foundation dry or moist soil
including laying in layer of 15cm. Breaking of clods
dressing to require profile with manual compaction
including intial lift up to 1.5 m and lead up to 50M.
Earth work excavation for foundation in dry or moist
soil including ramming of bottom scrapping of sides
dipodal of soil intial lift up to 1.5 m and lead up to
30M( As per item no. 2(c) page 6 of G.K.N.2013-14
BSR of Pali)
Execavation in Hard soil
Name of Site Khaniya nala
S.No.Item Rate Amount
0
Sojat IWMP 23 watershed
Tehsil - Mandalgarh, District - Bhilwara, State: Rajasthan, India
Abstract of Cost of Silt Retention Structure
Name of Village Khariyaniv
Quantity Cement Sand Aggrigate StoneCum / Sqm Bags Cum Cum Cum
1 Cement Concrete (1:4:8) 35.280 112.90 16.58 33.16 _2 Plaster in C.C. (1:4) 163.600 27.81 5.24 _ _3 Massonary in Cement 143.580 201.01 61.45 _ 157.944 Pointing in Cement 0.000 0.00 0.00 _ _5 Stone Kharanja in cement mortar (1:6) 22.000 30.8 8.25 _ 26.46 Cement concrete coping(1:2:4) 7.87 45.95 3.54 7.087 Dry Stone Pitching 0.000 _ _ _ 0.00
TOTAL 418.47 95.06 40.24 184.34 Say Bags 419
or 20.95 MT.
1 Cement 20.95 MT.2 Sand 95.06 Cum.3 Stones 184.34 Cum.4 Aggregates 40.24 Cum.
Name of Village :- KhariyanivName of Site :- Khaniya nala
S.No. ITEM
Sojat IWMP 23 watershedTehsil - Sojat, District – Pali, State: Rajasthan, India
Material Statement
:-
:-
:-
:-
=
1 Catch ment Area = 150 Ha.
2 Maxmium Rain fall intencity = 8 cm./hr.
3 General nature of catchment Area
a. Agricultural land = 250
b. Pasture Land = 178 Ha.
4 Height of crest above G.L. = 1.5 M.
5 Flood lift = 0.5
6 Free board = 0.5
7 Top width of Head wall = 0.7
8 Bottom width of Head wall = 2.50
9 Width of concrete Bed = 2.50
10 Length of crest = 20 M.
11 Percentage slope of land = 0.5
12 No. of well benefited = 0
13 Cost of Project = 515000.00
a. Labour component = 156000.00
b. Material component = 359000.00
c. Contingency = 14994
Sojat IWMP 23 watershed
Tehsil - Sojat, District - Pali, State: Rajasthan, India
Dimension for Construction & Costing
Type of Structure (Anicut)
Basic Data of Project
Name of Village Khariyaniv
Panchayat Khariyaniv
Name of Site Lavariya nala
…
150 Ha.
8 Cm/hr
250
178
1.5
20
0.5
0
0
S.C. 0
S.T. 0
Others 0
Total 0
S.C. 0
S.T. 0
Others 0
Total 0
Circle Pali
Height of crest above G.L.
Length of crest
Percentage slope of land
No. of well benefited
No of farmer benefited
Area to be benefited
Catch ment Area
Maxmium Rain fall intencity
General nature of catchment Area
Agricultural land
Pasture Land
:-
:-
A.
I Available crest length 20 M
ii Total catchment Area 150 Ha. As per G.T.Sheet
iii Peak Runoff Rate
a By Rational MethodQp = 0.0276 CIA
C= Coefficient of runoff 0.3
K = L3/2
/H1/2
I= Intensity of rain fall in cm/hr. 8
K = 8150.47 A= Catchment Area in Ha. 150
Tc = 0.0195K0.77
L=Maxmium length of travel by runoff water in m. 810
Tc = 20.03 H= Difference in elevation between most remote 8
point and and outlet point in meterQp= 0.0276 0.30 X 8 X 150
Qp = 9.94
b
Q = 1.71Lh3/2
9.94 = 1.71 20 h3/2
h 0.44
Say h= 0.5
3 hw= Wave height in meter
Fb= 1.5hw Df= Fetch length in meter 550 Meter.
1.5X0.014(Df)1/2
Fb= 0.49
Say Fb= 0.5
B.
1 Head wall
a Height of Head wall H= 1.5
b Top width( Tw) = h P= Sp.ht. Of masonary 2.3
(P-1)1/2
Tw= 0.44
Top width= 0.7
C. Bottom width Bw Tw+0.8H
1.90
So Bottom Width= 2.50 Meter
2 Head wall extension
a Length= H+h+1+Fb
1.5 + 0.5 + 1 + = 3.00 Meter
= 4
b Height of Head Extensionwall = H+h+Fb
1.5 + 0.5 + 0.5 = 2.5 Meter
c Top width 0.6 Meter
d Bottom Width= 0.5(H+h) = 0.5( 1.5 + 0.5 )= 1.00 Meter
Sojat IWMP 23 watershed
Tehsil - Sojat, District – Pali, State: Rajasthan, India
Name of Village Khariyaniv
Name of Site Lavariya nala
Bw=
But as per site condition
contd..
Desgin calculation of Anicut
Use when catchment is <1300Ha.
Q=Run off in m3/sec.
By weir formula
Free Board
STRUCTURAL DESGIN
3 Side wall
a Length= 1.75H+0.75h+0.45 = 3.45
But as per site condition= 4.0 Meter
b Height:
At H.W.End= H+h+Fb 1.5 + 0.5 + 0.5 = 2.5 Meter
At W.W.End= h+fb = 0.5 + 0.5 = 1.0 Meter
c Top width= 0.6 Meter
d Bottom width=
At H.W.End= 0.6+0.4(H+h) 1.4 Meter
At W.W.End= 0.6+0.4(1.5h) 0.9 Meter
But taken as= 1 Meter
4 Wing wall
a Height h+Fb 0.5 + 0.5 = 1.0 Meter
b Length= 2.25h 2.25 X 0.5 = 1.13 Meter Say 2
c Top width 0.6 Meter
Bottom width of wing wall 0.9 Meter
5 Apron
a Length= 20 Meter
b Width= H+h+Fb 1.5 + 0.5 + 0.5 2.5 Meter Say 3.5
c Thickness 0.8 Meter
6 Toe wall
a Length= 20 Meter
b Width= 0.5 Meter
c Height= 0.5 Meter
C= Coefficient of runoff 0.3
I= Intensity of rain fall in cm/hr. 8
A= Catchment Area in Ha. 150
L=Maxmium length of travel by runoff water in m. 810
H= Difference in elevation between most remote 8
point and and outlet point in meter
h= Head over the crest in mtr. 0.44 0.5
Df= Fetch length in meter 550
Fb =Free board 0.49 0.5
Top width Tw= 0.44 0.7
Height of cerst 1.5
Bottom Width of Head wall Bw 1.9 2
Lenth of Head wall extension= 3.00 5
Length of side wall= 3.45 5
Bottom Width of Side wall 1.4
0.9
Length of wing wall 2.00 2
:-
:-
FREE BODY DIAGRAM
a= 0.7b= 2.50H= 1.5h= 0.5
a
H
bb/3 2b/3
cw(H+H)
Specific Wt. Of masonary P = 2.3 T/m3
Specific Wt. of water w = 1 T/m3
Cofficient of uplift pressure c = 0.6cofficient of friction atbed surface and creep length = 0.75Weight of Dam-: =Weight of Dam-:
W1= aHPW1= T 2.415 T
b-a 3.105 T2
W= W1+W2= 2.415 + 3.105 = 5.52 T
Water pressureAt Depth h= P1 = wh = 1 X 0.5 = 0.5 T/m
2
At Depth H+h= P2 = w(H+h) =1( 1.50 + 0.5 ) = 2.0 T/m
2
Force aching due to water pressure I.e. Net horizontal
Water force P1+ P2 2 = 1.875 T/m
2
Horizontal water pressure at depth h =Fa= wHh= = 0.75 TAt depth H+h = Fb= P2-P1 = 1.125 T
2Force due to water column at crest F3 = wha= = 0.35 T
Up lift pressure U = 1/2 cwb (H+h) = 1.5 T
Sojat IWMP 23 watershedTehsil - Sojat, District – Pali, State: Rajasthan, India
Name of Village Khariyaniv
Name of Site Lavariya nala
W(H+h)
W2= HP=
P= H=
H
X
W1W2
U
fa
H/3
fbH/3
:-
:-
1 Safety against over turning
Over turning moment Mo = H H 22 3 3
1.5 1.5 22 3 3
Mo= 3.625Restoring Moment Mr = W1 (b-a/2) + W2 (b-a)2/3 + F3 (b-a/2)
Mr=Mr= 5.1923 + 3.726 + 0.753 = 9.67
Mr 9.6708Mo 3.625
Structure is safe against over turning
2 Safety against Rupture from tension
Net Vertical Pressure V = W1+W2+F3-U2.415 + 3.105 + 0.35 - 1.5 = 4.37
Position of resultant where it cut the baseExcess moment(Mr-Mo) 9.671 - 3.625
4.37
TRUE
3 Safety against crusing
Eccentricity e = b/2-X-0.133
Crusting stress at the toe of theHead wallPc= V (1+_6e/b)
bPc= 1.18808Pc<<20 Hence it is safe
4 Safety against sliding
Net vertical Force V= 4.37 TRestorin force = uV = 0.78 X 4.37 (u=0.65 to 0.75)
3.41297 TSliding force Net horizontal force= Fa+Fb
0.75 + 1.125 = 1.875 TFactor of safety = Restoring force 3.413
Sliding force 1.875
Hence it is safe
Sojat IWMP 23 WatershedTehsil - Sojat, District – Pali, State: Rajasthan, India
Name of Village KhariyanivName of Site Lavariya nala
STABILITY CHECKS
Fa + Fb + u b
0.75 + 1.125 + 1.5 2.50
Factor of safety = 2.668 >1.5 Hence
X= = = 1.38Net vertical force
== 1.82 >1.3 Hence
:-
:-
A
c
4 20.0 4
H.W.Ext.
H.W.
1
1.0
c
S.W.
0.6
4.0
APRON 3.5
1.0
2 T.W. 0.5
Sojat IWMP 23 watershed
Tehsil - Sojat, District – Pali, State: Rajasthan, India
PLAN AND SECTION OF Anicut
Name of Village Khariyaniv
Name of Site Lavariya nala
0.7
1.80
0.6W
.W.
B
W.W
PLANPLAN
Tehsil - Sojat, District – Pali, State: Rajasthan, India
0.7
1.5
0.5
2.5
1.5
0.5
1.5
SECTION ON A-A'
0.6
2.5
3.5
Sojat IWMP 23 watershed
:-:-
General features of Silt Retention Structure-:1.5 M.20 M.
1.5 M. 2.0 M.2.0 M. 1.0 M.0.7 M. 0.9 M.4.0 M. 0.9 M.2.5 M. 0.50 M.0.6 M. 0.50 M.1.0 M. 1.0 M.2.0 M. 0.8 M.4.0 M. 2.5 M.
1.00 M.1.0 M.1.5 M.
S.No. No L B H1
Total
2
40 X 7.0 = 280 Sqm.
3
Total Cum.
4
05
Total
Berm
Cutting0.00
Cum.
H.W. 1 X 20 X 2.2 X 1.5 = 66.00
H.W.Ext 2 X 4.0 X 1.0 X 2.5 = 20.00 Cum.
S.W. 2 X 4.0 X 1.00 X 2.5 = 20.00 Cum.
W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 0.9 X 2.50 = 9.00 Cum.
Apron 1 X 20 X 2.5 X 0.80 = 40.00 Cum.
T.W. 1 X 20 X 0.50 X 1.0 = 10.00 Cum.Total 165.00
1 Execavation in Hard soil 20% 33.002 Execavation in Murrum 40% 66.00
3 Execavation in DIR 40% 66.00
6
H.W. 1 X 20.0 X 2.2 X 0.3 = 13.20 Cum.
H.W.Ext 2 X 4 X 1.0 X 0.3 = 2.40 Cum.
S.W. 2 X 4 X 1.00 X 0.3 = 2.40 Cum.
W.W. 2 X 2 X 0.9 X 0.3 = 1.08 Cum.
Apron 1 X 20.0 X 2.5 X 0.3 = 15.00 Cum.T.W. 1 X 20.0 X 0.50 X 0.3 = 3.00 Cum.
Total 37.08
Sojat IWMP 23 watershedTehsil - Sojat, District – Pali, State: Rajasthan, India
DETAILED ESTIMATE OF Anicut
Name of Village Khariyaniv
Name of Site Lavariya nala
Height of crest=Length of Crest
Depth of foundation for H.W. = Length of wing wall=Bottom width of H.W. = Height of Wing wall=
Top of H.W = Bopttom width of Wing wall=Length of H.W.Ext = Depth of foundation for Wing wall =
Height of H.W.Ext. at H.W. = Height of Toewall=Top Width of H.W.Ext.= Top & Bopttom width of Toe wall=
Bottom width for H.W.Ext. Depth of foundation for Toe wall =Depth of foundation for H.W.Ext .= Thickness of Apron=
Length of side wall= Width of Apron =Bottom Width of S.W.
Height of side wall at W.W.End=Depth of foundation for side wall =
Item Quantity
Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep
Cutting and clearing of ordinary jungle
includling bushes shrubs and disposal as per
instructrion of engineer incharge( As per item
no. 1 page 6 of G.K.N.2013-14 BSR of Pali)Benching of the base and depositing the
execavated material for bund dressing etc. all
components
Earth work filling behind foundation dry or
moist soil including laying in layer of 15cm.
Breaking of clods dressing to require profile
with manual compaction including intial lift up
to 1.5 m and lead up to 50M.
Earth work excavation for foundation in dry or
moist soil including ramming of bottom
scrapping of sides dipodal of soil intial lift up to
1.5 m and lead up to 30M( As per item no. 2(c)
page 6 of G.K.N.2013-14 BSR of Pali)
Providing and laying of cement concrete well
mixed in cement mortar 1:4:8 laying in position
complete excluding curing with maxmium size
of aggregate up to 50 mm. ( As per item no. 11-
1 a page 7 of G.K.N.2013-14 BSR of Pali)
Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep
7
H.W. 1 X 20.0 X 2.0 X 1.2 = 48.00 Cum.
H.W.Ext 2 X 4.0 X 1.0 X 1.7 = 13.60 Cum.
S.W. 2 X 4.0 X 1.00 X 1.2 = 9.60 Cum.
W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 0.9 X 0.6 = 2.16 Cum.
T.W. 1 X 20.0 X 0.35 X 0.7 = 4.90 Cum.
Total 78.26 Cum.
8
H.W. 1 X 20.0 X 1.4 X 1.5 = 40.50 Cum.
H.W.Ext 2 X 4.0 X 0.8 X 2.5 = 16.00 Cum.
S.W. 2 X 4.0 X 0.8 X 1.75 = 11.20 Cum.
W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 0.9 X 1.0 = 3.60 Cum.
T.W. 1 X 20.0 X 0.50 X 0.50 = 5.00 Cum.
Total 76.30 Cum.9
Apron 1 X 20.0 X 2.5 X 0.50 25.00 Cum.
Total 25.00 Cum.
10
H.W. 1 X 20.0 X 0.7 X 0.1 = 1.40 Cum.
H.W.Ext 2 X 4.0 X 0.6 X 0.1 = 0.48 Cum.
S.W. 2 X 4.0 X 0.6 X 0.07 = 0.34 Cum.
W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 0.9 X 0.07 = 0.25 Cum.
T.W. 1 X 20.0 X 0.50 X 0.1 = 1.00 Cum.
Apron 1 X 20.0 X 2.50 X 0.1 = 5.00 Cum.Total 8.47 Cum.
11H.W. 0 X 20.0 X 2 = 0.00 Sqm.
Total 0.00 Sqm.
12
H.W. 1 X 20.0 X 3.6 = 72.00H.W. 1 x 12.0 x 1.5 = 18.00H.W. 1 x 12.0 x 1.3 = 15.60H.W.Ext. 4 X 4.0 X 0.5 = 8.00H.W.Ext. 2 X 5.0 X 0.6 = 6.00S.W. 2 X 4.0 X 2.4 = 18.80W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 1.6 = 6.40T.W. 2 X 20.0 X 0.5 = 20.00
Total = 164.80
13
0 ( 6 + 6 )* 0.23 0.00
2
Flush pointing in cement motar (1:3)
20 m.m thick plastering on new surface in
cement mortar (1:4)( As per item no. 66(b)
page 13 of G.K.N.2013-14 BSR of Pali)
Dry stone pitching of Hammer dressed witch
packing of voids of small stone including all lifts
in require profile (23 cm depth)
Random rubble stone masonary for foundation
& plinth cement sand mortar(1:6) for Silt
Retention Structure( As per item no. 24 a
page 8 of G.K.N.2013-14 BSR of Pali)
Random rubble stone masonary for Super
Structure cement sand mortar(1:6) for Silt
Retention Structure( As per item no. 25 page
8 of G.K.N.2013-14 BSR of Pali)
Random rubble stone masonary for Apron
cement sand mortar(1:6) for Silt Retention
Structure( As per item no. 25 page 8 of
G.K.N.2013-14 BSR of Pali)
Providing and laying of cement concrete well
mixed in cement mortar 1:2:4 laying in position
complete excluding curing with maxmium size
of aggregate up to 12 mm etc. complete ( As
per item no. 121 a page 15 of G.K.N.2013-14
BSR of Pali)
Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep
Height of crest= 1.5
Thickness of C.C. in (1:4:8) 0.3 M.
Length of Crest 20 M.
Depth of foundation for H.W. = 2.0 M
Bottom width of H.W. = 2.0 M
Top of H.W = 0.7 M
Length of H.W.Ext = 4.0 M
Height of H.W.Ext. at H.W. = 2.5 M
Top Width of H.W.Ext.= 0.6 M
Bottom width for H.W.Ext. 1.0 M
Depth of foundation for H.W.Ext.= 1.2 M
Length of side wall= 4.0 M
Bottom Width of S.W. 1.0 M
Height of side wall at W.W.End= 1.0 M
Depth of foundation for side wall = 2.5 M
Length of wing wall= 2.0 M
Height of Wing wall= 1.0 M
Bopttom width of Wing wall= 0.9 M
Depth of foundation for Wing wall = 1.9 M
Height of Toewall= 0.50 M
Top & Bopttom width of Toe wall= 0.5 M
Depth of foundation for Toe wall = 0.9 M
Thickness of Apron= 0.8 M
Width of Apron = 2.5 M
:-:-
Quatity UnitLabour Total Labour cost Total Cost
1
0.00 Cum. 1.00 1.00 0.00 0
2
280 Sqm. 4.50 4.50 1260.00 12603
0 Cum. 77.60 85.00 0.00 04
0 Cum. 81.50 85.00 0.00 05
165.00 Cum. 033.00 Cum. 93.00 93.00 3069.00 306966.00 Cum. 113.00 113.00 7458.00 745866.00 Cum. 165.00 165.00 10890.00 10890
6
37.08 Cum. 403.08 1937 14946.21 71823.96
7
78.26 Cum. 583.85 2008 45692.10 157146.088
76.30 Cum. 583.85 2008 44547.76 153210.49
25.00 Cum. 583.85 2008 14596.25 5020010
8.47 Cum. 405.53 3006 3434.03 25454.808
11 0.00 Sqm. 24.2 0 0.00 0
12
164.80 Sqm. 56.26 117 9271.65 19281.613
0.00 Cum. 40.5 195 0.00 0Total 155164.9884 499793.85Contingency 3% 14993.82
TOTAL 155164.9884 514787.66Say total Cost 515000.0
Labour cost 156000.0
Meterial cost 359000.0
0
Sojat IWMP 23 watershed
Tehsil - Mandalgarh, District - Bhilwara, State: Rajasthan, India
Abstract of Cost of Silt Retention Structure
Name of Village Khariyaniv
Name of Site Lavariya nala
S.No.Item Rate Amount
Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep
Cutting and clearing of ordinary jungle includling
bushes shrubs and disposal as per instructrion of
engineer incharge( As per item no. 1 page 6 of
G.K.N.2013-14 BSR of Pali)Benching of the base and depositing the
execavated material for bund dressing etc. all
components
Earth work filling behind foundation dry or moist soil
including laying in layer of 15cm. Breaking of clods
dressing to require profile with manual compaction
including intial lift up to 1.5 m and lead up to 50M.
Earth work excavation for foundation in dry or moist
soil including ramming of bottom scrapping of sides
dipodal of soil intial lift up to 1.5 m and lead up to
30M( As per item no. 2(c) page 6 of G.K.N.2013-14
BSR of Pali)
Execavation in Hard soil
Providing and laying of cement concrete well mixed
in cement mortar 1:2:4 laying in position complete
excluding curing with maxmium size of aggregate
up to 12 mm etc. complete ( As per item no. 121 a
page 15 of G.K.N.2013-14 BSR of Pali)
Flush pointing in cement motar (1:3)
20 m.m thick plastering on new surface in cement
mortar (1:4)( As per item no. 66(b) page 13 of
G.K.N.2013-14 BSR of Pali)
Dry stone pitching of Hammer dressed witch
packing of voids of small stone including all lifts in
require profile (23 cm depth)
Execavation in MurrumExecavation in DIRProviding and laying of cement concrete well mixed
in cement mortar 1:4:8 laying in position complete
excluding curing with maxmium size of aggregate
up to 50 mm. ( As per item no. 11-1 a page 7 of
G.K.N.2013-14 BSR of Pali)
Random rubble stone masonary for foundation &
plinth cement sand mortar(1:6) for Silt Retention
Structure( As per item no. 24 a page 8 of
G.K.N.2013-14 BSR of Pali)Random rubble stone masonary for Super Structure
cement sand mortar(1:6) for Silt Retention
Structure( As per item no. 25 page 8 of
G.K.N.2013-14 BSR of Pali)
Random rubble stone masonary for Apron cement
sand mortar(1:6) for Silt Retention Structure( As per
item no. 25 page 8 of G.K.N.2013-14 BSR of Pali)
Quantity Cement Sand Aggrigate StoneCum / Sqm Bags Cum Cum Cum
1 Cement Concrete (1:4:8) 37.080 118.66 17.43 34.86 _2 Plaster in C.C. (1:4) 164.800 28.02 5.27 _ _3 Massonary in Cement 154.560 216.38 66.15 _ 170.024 Pointing in Cement 0.000 0.00 0.00 _ _5 Stone Kharanja in cement mortar (1:6) 25.000 35 9.375 _ 306 Cement concrete coping(1:2:4) 8.47 49.45 3.81 7.627 Dry Stone Pitching 0.000 _ _ _ 0.00
TOTAL 447.51 102.04 42.48 200.02 Say Bags 448
or 22.40 MT.
1 Cement 22.4 MT.2 Sand 102.04 Cum.3 Stones 200.02 Cum.4 Aggregates 42.48 Cum.
Name of Site :- Lavariya nala
S.No. ITEM
0
Sojat IWMP 23 watershedTehsil - Sojat, District – Pali, State: Rajasthan, India
Material Statement
Name of Village :- Khariyaniv
1 Name of w/s :- Sojat IWMP -23 watershed
P.S . Sojat DIST. PALI (Raj.)
2 Name of work :- Low Cost Drop structure across main nala Near Devnarayan Mandir
1 Available crest length 10 M
2 Hight of structure 1.10 M
3 Top Width 0.6 M
4 Bottom Width 1.48 M
5 Depth of foundation taking as 1.40 M
6 Length of Basin 1.00 M
7 Head wall ext. 2.00 M
S.No. PARTICULAR No. LENGTH WIDTH HT/DEPTH Qty Total Rate Total Amount Lab Rate L.Amount
1 Total Excavation
H.W. 1.00 10.00 1.48 1.40 20.72
H.W.EX. 2.00 2.00 0.90 1.40 5.04
Apron 1.00 10.00 1.00 0.60 6.00
Total (cu.m) 31.76
2 Excavation in hard soil dry or
most&disposal of excavated
material within intial lead of 30 m
and liftof 1.5m including dressing
etc complete 100%of Total
Excavation. (As Per BSR 2013-
14, page no 6, Item no. 2 a)
Total 31.76
Haed Soil 40 % 12.70 93.00 1181.47 93.00 1181.47
Mouram 60 % 19.06 113.00 2153.33 113.00 2153.33
3 cement concrete well mixed in
cement mortar(1:4:8) laid in
position complete including curing
Aggregate size upto 50mm. HB
Total Excavation H.W.(As Per
BSR 2013-14, page no 7, Item no.
11-2 a) 1.00 10.00 1.48 0.30 4.44
H.W.EX. 2.00 2.00 0.90 0.30 1.08
Apron 1.00 10.00 1.00 0.30 3.00
Total 8.52 1746 14875.92 403.08 3434.24
4 Random rubble stone masonary
in cement sand mortar(1:6) for
foundation (As Per BSR 2013-14,
page no 8, Item no. 24(a)
H.W. 1.00 10.00 1.48 1.10 16.28
H.W.EX. 2.00 2.00 0.60 1.10 2.64
Apron 1.00 10.00 1.00 0.30 3.00
Total 21.92 2008 44015.36 583.85 12797.99
5 Random rubble stone masonary
in cement sand mortar(1:6) for
super structure (As Per BSR 2013-
14, page no 8, Item no. 24(a)
H.W. 1.00 10.00 1.04 1.10 11.44
H.W.EX. 2.00 2.00 0.60 1.60 3.84
Total 11.44 2008 22971.52 583.85 6679.24
6 Cement plaster including smooth
finishing in cement mortar
(1:6)25mm thick (As Per BSR
2013-14, page no 13, Item no. 67
(a)
H.W. 1.00 10.00 1.10 11.00
1.00 10.00 1.40 14.00
H.W.EX. 2.00 0.60 0.50 0.60
Apron 1.00 10.00 1.00 10.00
Total 35.60 157 5589.20 95.89 3413.68
7 Cement concrete coping in
cement mortar1:2:4. 12 mm thick
(As Per BSR 2013-14, page no
20, Item no. 121 a)
H.W. 1.00 10.00 0.60 0.075 0.45
H.W.EX. 2.00 2.00 0.60 0.075 0.18
Apron 1.00 10.00 1.48 0.075 1.11
Total 1.74 3006 5230.44 405.53 705.62
GRAND TOTAL 96017.24 30365.58
METARIAL 65651.66
LABOUR 30365.58
TOTAL 96017.24
Add 3% Contingency Charges 2880.52
TOTAL Rs. 98897.76
Say 0.99
WATER HARVESTING STRUCTURE
DETAILED ESTIMATE
Note:- B.S.R Apply for G.K.N. 2009-10
NAME OF WORK : RAIN WATER HARVESTING STRUCTURE
S.no Particular Qty. Cement Sand Aggregate Stone
Bags Cum 50mm 20mm Cum
1 Cement concrete (1:4:8) mm (cum)
3.20,0.48,0.96 8.52 27.26 4.09 8.18
2 R R stone masonary (1:8)
Foundation/ Super structure (cum)
1.07, 0.3, 1.1 33.36 35.7 10.01 36.7
3 Cement plaster (1:6)2 mm thick (sqm)
0..033 0.015 35.60 0.53 1.17
4 Raised &cut pointing (sqm) 0.0.32,
0.0043
5 Stone kharanja in cement mortar
(1:6)(cum) 1.80, 0.375, 1.20
6 Cement concrete coping in cement
mortar1:2:4 .50 mm thick 1.74 11.14 0.78 1.57
7 Dry stone pitching
TOTAL 74.6 16.06 9.75 36.7
SAY 75 BAGS 3.73 MT
0.60 10
2.00 2.00
1.00
1.40 0.3
10
G.L 0.6
1.10 0.3
1.48
X-Section
MATERIAL CONSUMPTION STAEMENT
1.00
Drg. for W.H. Structure
0.6
1.4
G.L
0.6
1.1 0.3
1.48
G.L 2 10 2
10
0.3
#REF!
X-Section of Masonry Structure
PLAN
Modal estimate
Depth 0.45 m
width 0.45 m
Total Area in Ha 30
S.no. Item Quantity Unit Rate Amount
1 Marking of contour line through dumpy
level
9000 Rm 0.78 7020.00
2 Dug belling work for CCT up to 5-7 cm
depth (As per BSR 2013-14, P.no. 26, item
no. 186)
18000 Rm 0.58 10440.00
3 Excavation of hard soil for CCT as per BSR
2013-14, P.no. 6, item no. 2b)
911.25 Cum 113.00 102971.25
4 Excavation of murram for CCT as per BSR
2013-14, P.no. 6, item no. 2c)
911.25 Cum 165.00 150356.25
5 Sowing of local grass seed on bunds As per
BSR 2013-14, P.no. 19, item no. 112)
27000 Rm 0.73 19710.00
6 Grass seed 0.00
Stylohemata 2 Kg 42.00 84.00
Dhaman 3 Kg 48.00 144.00
Total cost for CCT 290725.5
8721.77
299447.279982/-Ha
CX= 0.2025 Cum
Add. Contengency 3%
Grand Total
SAY AM
MODEL ESTIMATE Tehsil - Sojat, District – Pali State - Rajasthan, India
Name of Village-
Name of work :- Open Contour Trench
Total length of CCT per ha =300 rm/ha
Page 1
modal es
Name of site :- Chragah Plot no. -1 ( )
Name of Work :- Pasture Land Development
50.00 Ha. Area for trenching, Size of trench 0.45 mt. Depth 0.45 mt. Width
33.3 Mt. Contour to contour intervals 0.2025 Sqm cross section area of trench
80 MM / Hr. Rainfall intensity of area 0.5 Hr. (Tc) duration 300.00 mm Av. rainfall
25% Runoff co oficient Runoff arrested 60.00% 60.00 Cum. in one hectare
296.30 Mt. trenching length required in one hectare of landSay CCT/ha. 300.00 3000 Cum. In this plot.
70.00 Rmt. Length of thor fence per ha. No of thor sticks in one meter length 4.00
10% Damaging due to transportation, rehandling and planting
204.08 Plants to be planted in one hectare Say 200 49.00 7 x 7 mt. Spacing
1.20 Mt. Depth of cattle protection trench, Top width 1.5 Bottom width0.9
1.44 Sqm cross section area of trench 70.00 Rmt. Length of cattle protection trench per ha.S.no Particular Unit Quantity Rate Amount
1 Dug belling work up to 5 to 7 cm depth. Rmt. 3500 0.58 2030.00
2 Excavation of cattle protection trench Cum 5040
a
Excavation of cattle protection trench in
hard soil 40%. Cum 2016 113 227808.00
b
Excavation of cattle protection trench in
Ordinary murram 30%. Cum 1512 165 249480.00
c
Excavation of cattle protection trench in
Disintigreted rock 30%. Cum 1512 218 329616.00
3
Supply and cutting of 80 cm thor
sticks. Per 100 stick 154 0 0.00
4
Transportation cost of thor sticks
through bullock cart from 5 km distance,
loading & unloading. Per 100 stick 154 0 0.00
5
Rehandling work of thor sticks up to 200
to 500mt distance. Per 100 stick 154 0 0.00
6 Planting of Thor sticks. Rmt. 3500 0 0.00
7
Layout ( by A-farm or dumpy level) for
contouring. Rmt. 15000 1.41 21150.00
8
Dug belling work up to 5 to 7 cm depth
for contouring. Rmt. 15000 0.58 8700.00
40%
CCT Excavation in 40 % soft soil for
trenching. Cum 1215 93.00 112995.00
60%
CCT Excavation in 60 %hard soil for
trenching. Cum 1822.5 113.00 205942.50
60%
Pit digging in hard soil of size 45x45x45
Cm. Cum 6000 8.3 49800.00
40%
Pit digging in moorm soil of size
45x45x45 Cm. Cum 4000 16.5 66000.00
11 Treatment of pit by FYM. Per pit 10000 0.29 2900.00
12 Cost of saplings Per plant 10000 4.00 40000.00
13 Plantation work Per pit 10000 4.50 45000.00
14
Transportation Cost of saplings from 10
km distance. Per 1000 Plant 10 745.00 7450.00
15
Ring making of 0.5 Mt. Radius & 30 Cm.
width X 20 Cm. Depth. Per plant 10000 3.00 30000.00
MODAL ESTIMATE FOR PASTURE LAND
Costing & Quantity Estimation of Pasture Land Development
Page 1
modal es
A
Two times watering to the plant with 15
liters per plant. Per plant 10000 2.20 22000.00
B
Transportation Cost of water from 2 km
distance. Per 1000 Plant 10 230.00 2300.00
17 Interculture operation. Per plant 10000 0.90 9000.00
18
Ploughing by tractor cultivator and grass
seed broadcasting (seed rate 6 to 8
kgs/ha) cost of seed not included Ha. 16.00 1294.00 20704.00
50% Dhaman Kg. 300 48.00 14400.00
50% Stylo hamata Kg. 200 42.00 8400.00
20
Making pallets of mixture of fine soil,
grass seed, manure etc (seed rate 6 to
8 kgs/ha) cost of seed not included Kg. 500.00 20.60 10300.00
21 Tree seed
Deshibabool Kg. 15.00 15.00 225.00
Bore Kg. 15.00 15.00 225.00
23 Sowing of tree seed on ridges. Rmt. 15000.00 0.73 10950.00
25 Gap filling in second year (20%) 25730.00
Total cost of pasture land development Rs.1,523,105.50
Contingency @ 3% 45693.17
Grand Total Rs.1,568,798.67
Cost Per Ha Rs.31,375.97
Page 2
CHAPTER VIII
Chapter VIII
Location –District, block, village, watershed location map
Map of IWMP-23 Project with Watershed Boundary demarcation in cadastral map
PRA Map (along with photos & paper drawing)
Cadastral Map on watershed boundary
Land Use Land Cover map
Information on existing water harvesting structures and well inventory along with
GPS coordinates
Documents of Agreement:
Proceedings of Gram Sabha for EPA approval
Proceedings of Gram Sabha Resolution for committee constitution
Proceedings of Gram Sabha for DPR approval
Proceedings of Standing Committee of P.S for DPR approval
Proceedings of Standing Committee of Z.P for DPR approval
Name of Project Pali IWMP-23/11-12 Block Sojat District
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
1 watershed
management works
1.1 Land Development
(Productive use)
1.1.1 Afforestation
(Wasteland) Ha
1.1.2 Afforestation (on Total
Land Including Waste land) Ha
1.1.3 Horticulture (on waste
land) Ha
1.1.4 Horticulture (on Total
Land including Waste land) Ha
1.1.5 Agriculture (on
wasteland) Ha
1.1.6 Agriculture (on total
land including waste land) 580.3 Ha 0 0 116.17 203.29 203.29
1.1.7 Pasture (on waste
land) 425 Ha 0 0 170 170 85
1.1.8 Pasture (on total land
including waste land 320 Ha 0 0.0 128.0 128.0 64.0
1.1.9 Others (on wasteland)
` Ha
1.1.10 Others (on total land
including waste land) Ha
Physical Target (Watershed works)
Pali
Financial Year wise Physical TargetName of the head Name of Activity Name of Sub activity
Total target
(Quantity)
Unit
(Ha/Nos/Rmt/
Cum)
1.2 Soil and moisture
conservation 1.2.1 Staggared Trenching Ha
1.2.2 Contour Bunding 320 Ha 0 0 128 128 64
1.2.3 Graded bunding 0 Ha 0 0 0 0 0
1.2.4 Earthen Bunding 1391.17 Ha 0 0 556.68 556.68 278.34
1.2.5 Stone Bunding 0 Ha 0 0 0 0 0
1.3 Vegetative and
engineering structure 1.3.1 Earthen Structure 0 Cubic Meter 0 0 0 0 0
1.3.2 Brush wood checks 0 Rmt 0 0 0 0 0
1.3.3 Nadi 2 Nos 0 0 2 0 0
1.3.4 Loose boulder 195 Cubic Meter 0 0 78 78 39
1.3.5 Gabion structure 122.88 Cubic Meter 0 0 0 122.88 0
1.3.6 others 0 Nos 0 0 0 0 0
1.4 Water harvesting
structure (New created) 1.4.1 Farm ponds 8 Nos 0 0 4 4 0
1.4.2 Anicut 4 Nos 0 0 2 2 0
1.4.3 Massonary Wall 0 Nos 0 0 0 0 0
1.4.4 Facewall 0 Nos 0 0 0 0 0
1.4.5 Ground water
recharge structure 0 Nos 0 0 0 0 0
1.4.6 Others 1 Nos 0 0 1 0 0
1.5 Water harvesting
structure (renovated) 1.5.1 Farm ponds 0 Nos 0 0 0 0 0
1.5.2 Anicut Repair 1 Nos 0 0 1 0 0
1.5.3 Nalla bunds 0 Nos 0 0 0 0 0
1.5.4 Perculation tanks 0 Nos 0 0 0 0 0
1.5.5 Ground water
recharge structure 0 Nos 0 0 0 0 0
1.5.6 Others 0 Nos 0 0 0 0 0
1.6 water harvesting
structure ( Storage capacity
of new structure 1.6.1 Farm ponds 8000 0 0 0 4000 4000 0
1.6.2 Anicut 0 Cubic Meter 0 0 0 0 0
1.6.3 Massonary Wall 0 Cubic Meter 0 0 0 0 0
1.6.4 Facewall 0 Cubic Meter 0 0 0 0 0
1.6.5 Ground water
recharge structure 0 Cubic Meter 0 0 0 0 0
1.6.6 Others 6500 Cubic Meter 0 0 3250 3250 0
1.7 water harvesting
structure ( Storage capacity
of renovated structure 1.7.1 Farm ponds 0 Cubic Meter 0 0 0 0 0
1.7.2 Anicut 0 Cubic Meter 0 0 0 0 0
1.7.3 Nalla bunds 0 Cubic Meter 0 0 0 0 0
1.7.4 Perculation tanks 0 Cubic Meter 0 0 0 0 0
1.7.5 Ground water
recharge structure 0 Cubic Meter 0 0 0 0 0
1.7.6 Others 0 Cubic Meter 0 0 0 0 0
2 EPA 2.1 No of EPA activities 41 Nos 0 0 41 0 0
2.2 No of water extracting
unit created 2 Nos 0 0 2 0 0
3 Institution and capacity building
3.1 SHG formation (newly
created) 3.1.1 No of SHG 145 Nos 0 0 5 53 52
3.1.2 Total no of SHGs
members 1450 Nos 0 0 50 500 500
3.2 SHG formation (assisted
) 3.2.1 No of SHG assistant 151 Nos 0 0 23 53 52
3.2.2 Total no of SHGs
members 1510 Nos 0 0 60 0 0
3.3 UG formation 3.3.1 No of UG 21 Nos 0 21 0 0 0
3.3.2 Total no of members
Ugs 105 Nos 0 105 0 0 0
3.4 Formation of federation 3.4.1 No of federation 10 Nos 0 0 3 3 4
3.4.2 Total no of members
of federation 160 Nos 0 0 0 160 0
3.5 Capacity building 3.5.1 No of training 212 Nos 0 0 101 55 56
3.5.2 No of persons trained 5464 Nos 0 200 1750 1750 1764
4 Livelihood activity for
the asset less persons 4.1 No of activities Nos
4.2 No of beneficiaries 26 Nos 0 0 10 10 6
5 Production system and
micro enterprices5.1 Agro forestry (Karunda,
aloevera) 5.1.1 No of activities 0 Nos 0 0 0 0 0
5.1.2 No of beneficiaries 0 Nos 0 0 0 0 05.2 Crop demonstration
(Rabi and Kharif) 5.2.1 No of activities 0 Nos 0 0 0 0 0
5.2.2 No of beneficiaries 0 Nos 0 0 0 0 05.3 Vegetable Kit (kitchen
garden) 5.3.1 No of activities 0 Nos 0 0 0 0 0
5.3.2 No of beneficiaries 0 Nos 0 0 0 0 05.4 Fodder demonstration 5.4.1 No of activities 0 Nos 0 0 0 0 0
5.4.2 No of beneficiaries 0 Nos 0 0 0 0 05.5 Sprinkler 5.5.1 Area Covered 0 Ha 0 0 0 0 0
5.5.2 No of beneficiaries 0 Nos 0 0 0 0 05.6 Pipeline 5.6.1 No of activities 0 Nos 0 0 0 0 0
5.6.2 No of beneficiaries 0 Nos 0 0 0 0 0
5.7 Others 5.7.1 No of activities 6 Nos 0 0 0 0 0
5.7.2 No of beneficiaries 51 Nos 0 10 17 17 7
Name of
Project IWMP-23/11-12 Block Sojat Distt.
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
1 Watershed
development
works 1.1 Land development 1.1.1 Afforestation 2.86 0 0 0.57 1 1 0.29
1.1.2 Horticulture 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1.1.3 Agriculture 45.37 0 0 9.07 15.88 15.88 4.54
1.1.4 Pasture 133.3 0 0 53.34 53.34 26.67 0
1.1.5 Others 6.67 0 0 1.33 2.33 2.33 0.67
1.2 Soil and moisture
conservation 1.2.1 Staggered trenching 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1.2.2 Contour bunding 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1.2.3 Graded bunding 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1.2.4 Earthen Bunding 162.42 0 0 64.97 64.97 32.48 0
1.2.5 Stone Bunding 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1.3 Vegetative
engineering 1.3.1 Earthen Structure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1.3.2Brush wood checks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1.3.3 Nadi 1.92 0 0 1.92 0 0 0
1.3.4 Loose bolder 29.56 0 0 11.82 11.82 5.91 0
1.3.5 Gabion Structure 1.377 0 0 0 1.377 0 0
1.3.6 Others 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1.4 Water harvesting
structure (New created) 1.4.1 Farm ponds 6.49 0 0 3.25 3.25 0 0
1.4.2 Anicut 21.89 0 0 11.62 10.27 0 0
1.4.3 Massonary Wall 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1.4.4 Facewall 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1.4.5 Ground water recharg
structure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1.4.6 Others 0.99 0 0 0.99 0 0 0
1.5 Water harvesting
structure (Renovated) 1.5.1 Farm ponds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1.56.2 Anicut Repair 0.69 0 0 0.69 0 0 0
1.5.3 Nallah bunds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1.5.4 Perculation tanks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1.5.5 Ground water recharg
structure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1.5.6 Others 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Name of head Name of activity Name of sub-activity Total target
Financial Target (Watershed Works)
Amount (Rs in lakh)
Financial year
Pali
2
Administrativ
e cost 2.1 Salary 48.83 0 0 17.09 12.21 9.77 9.77
2.2 others 20.93 0 7.32 5.23 4.19 4.19
3 Monitoring
3.1 Monitoring of
projects 6.98 0 0 2.84 1.74 1.25 1.14
4 Entry point
activity 4.1 Plan for EPA 27.9 0 0 27.9 0 0 0
5 Institution
and capacity
building 5.1 SHG formation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5.2 UG formation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5.3 Formation of federation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5.4 Capacity building 34.88 0 0 20.56 7.45 6.85 0
5.5 Others 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6 DPR 6.1 Prepration of DPR 6.975 0 0 6.975 0 0 0
7 Livelihood
activities for
the asset-less
persons
7.1 Plan for livelihood
activities 62.76 0 0 12.7 20.15 22.75 6.8
8 Production
system and
micro
enterprises 8.1 Sericulture 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8.2 Bee keeping 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8.3 poultry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8.4 fisheries 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8.5 Bio fuel Plantation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8.6 Others 6.67 0 0 1.33 2.33 2.33 0.67
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
1
No. of trainings
planned 0 0 101 55 56
2
No. of persons to
be trained 0 0 2954 1250 1260
Capacity building plan (PIA LEVEL)
Financial Year
No. Head
Financial Target
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
1 Administrative 0 0 17.9 12.21 9.77 9.77
2 Capacity building 0 0 20.56 7.45 6.85 0
3 Monitoring 0 0 2.84 1.74 1.25 1.14
4 Preparation of DPR 0 0 6.97 0 0 0
5 EPA 0 0 27.9 0 0 0
6 Any Other 0 0 11.36 6.96 5.00 4.56
FINANCIAL PIA
No. Head
projectwise
Amount ( Rs. In lakh)
Financial year
Bibliography
http://www.krishi.rajasthan.gov.in/Departments/Agriculture/AGRICULTURAL-
STATISTICS-2010-11.pdf
http://waterresources.rajasthan.gov.in/Daily_Rainfall_Data/Rainfall_Index.htm
http://164.100.112.66/netnrega/Progofficer/PoIndexFrame.aspx?flag_debited=B&lflag=loc
al&District_Code=2720&district_name=%E0%A4%AA%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%B2%E0%
A5%80&state_name=%E0%A4%B0%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%9C%E0%A4%B8%E0%A5
%8D%E0%A4%A5%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%A8&state_Code=27&finyear=2013-
2014&check=1&block_name=%E0%A4%B8%E2%80%8D%E0%A5%8C%E0%A4%9C%
E0%A4%A4&Block_Code=2720003
Diversity, Development and Ecological Change-Salt River:Institute of Development
Studies, JaipurField-work Plan:Phase I Field Work Report: May — June 2001
http://bpl2002.raj.nic.in/pdf/Pali_List.zip
http://statistics.rajasthan.gov.in/English2013/chapters/C1f%202012-13.pdf
http://statistics.rajasthan.gov.in/socio_Pali.aspx
http://censusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/files/09-
Rajasthan_AHS_Bulletin__23x36_.pdf
http://statistics.rajasthan.gov.in/English2013/chapters/C1f%202012-13.pdf
Policies Rajasthan Govt and demand and supply of fodder etc pdf