detailed project report - rajasthanwater.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...6.5 entry...

Detailed Project Report Integrated Watershed Management Programme

[IWMP-II, Jahazpur, District: Bhilwara, Raj.]

Project Implementation Agency: Foundation for Ecological Security

Period of Project: 2009-2016

Total Area: 7191 Ha & Total Budget: 862.92 lacs

Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur

PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj

Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)

2

Table of Contents 1. Project at a Glance

2. Watershed Map

3. Introduction

4. Conceptual Buildup: Strengthening Watershed Development Work

5. Project Purpose, Objectives and Outcomes

6. Area Details 4.1 Geographical Profile

4.2. Geological Profile

4.3. Ecological Profile

4.4. Land Use Profile

4.5. Edaphic Profile

4.6. Socio-demographic Profile

4.7. Livelihood Profile

7. Elements of Work

8.1 Ecologically sound regeneration

8.2 Institutional mechanism

8.3 Building dialogue and discussion

8. Components of Work

6.1 Capacity building and community mobilization

6.2 Work on landscape components

6.2.1 Work on arable land

6.2.2 Work on non arable land

6.2.3 Drainage line treatment

6.3 Livelihood promotion activities

6.4 Energy conservation

6.5 Entry Point Activities

9. Technical Plan

10. Budget

11. Annexure

12. Glossary




3

Project at a Glance 1. Name of watershed : Integrated Watershed Management Programme

2. Total watershed area : 7191 ha

3. Macro watershed number : 1 and 3

4. Micro-watershed number : Macro: 1 [Micro 1]

Macro: 3 [Micro 4,5,6 & 8]

5. Gram Panchayat : Baori, Teetori, Gandher, Phalasiya & Pandher

6. Villages in watershed area : Baori, Taswariya, Teetori, Gulabpura,

Bheelri, Dhagariya, Gandher, Bheempura,

Maganpura, Teetora- Mafi, Indokia,

Sihana, Jaswantpura, Gokulpura & Pandher

7. Panchayat Samiti : Jahazpur

8. Tehsil : Jahazpur

9. Name of project : Integrated Watershed Management

Program

10. Budget : 8.63 crore

Sl. No. Details

1 Name of project [as per GOI] IWMP –II

2 Year of Sanction Vide letter F.18(199) WSD & SWC/PFC/2009/1822-2104

dated 11.11.2009. Issue of Sanction 9th March 2010. MOU

signed between DWDU & FES on 31st May 2010

3 No. of gram panchayat &

revenue villages

5 & 15 respectively

4 Elevation Highest 360 & lowest 337 MSL.

5 Slope (%) 6-8

6 Type of project Other

7 River Catchment Banas

8 Treatable area 7191 ha @ Rs 12000/ ha cost




4

1. Introduction:

The Government of Rajasthan and Foundation for Ecological Security has signed an

agreement in April 2010 for implementation of the “IWMP” watershed in Jahazpur

Tehsil of Bhilwara district. It has been proposed to develop 7191 ha through

budgetary support from Government of India and Government of Rajasthan under

Integrated Watershed Management Programme [IWMP-II]. Acknowledging the

potential of watershed development, the project aims to promote sustainable

livelihoods through strengthening the ecological and institutional foundation in the

area.

The project will guide an intervention which is anchored on people’s engagement at

various levels and is based on the specific characteristics of the socio-economic-

ecological settings, to foster a healthy relationship between livelihoods and natural

surroundings and offer stable economic opportunities. In translating this to action, it

is essential to realistically assess the potential of the farming system, common and

private resources, and soil, water, biodiversity and nutrient capacity. The scope of the

desired intervention is in terms of bringing equilibrium between supply and demand

both quantitatively and qualitatively, so as to develop a balance between

appropriation and production needs. Realistic assessment and movement towards a

balanced land use and livelihood strategies would significantly depend on the

strength and character of the institutions of collective management and regulation.

FES as the Project Implementing Agency (PIA) would make efforts towards engaging

with different stakeholders in initiating and strengthening systems of collective

management over land and water. Village level institutions would be strengthened to

put in place good governance for development and equitable appropriation of

commons. Capacities of the Watershed Development Committees, User Groups and

Self Help Groups would be enabled for the post-project operation and maintenance

and further development of the assets created during the project period. Adoption of

low cost and indigenous technology would be promoted. Convergence of additional




5

financial resources from other government programmes such as MGNREGA,

National Horticulture Mission, Rashtriya krishi Vikas Yojana, Tribal Welfare Schemes,

Artificial Groundwater Recharging, and Green India Mission would be facilitated.

The project thus, provides a unique opportunity to work on issues of ecological

security and improvement in the well being of the different sections of the society and

will guide the planning, implementation and the capacity building aspects. Keeping

in view the watershed-based development approach, a detailed project report has

been prepared to guide the implementation process. During the preparation of the

report detailed discussions and negotiations with the community and the village level

institutions were conducted to analyze the need reflected by the individual household

level survey, primary data and secondary sources of data. Sequential capacity

building programmes were organised with PRI representatives, community members

and Watershed committee aimed at enabling capacities to understand information’s

and assist in the planning process of the DPR preparation.

During the process of planning the entry point activities [EPA] had become the

epicenter of the village level discussions, and the community members who were

monitoring the EPA activities were capacitated to prepare the village level activity

plan & budget on the basis of the local need and also the monitoring management

plan for effective & efficient implementation. The area being effected by acute floride

so the community response to roof rain water harvesting in the schools was

overwhelming supported.




6

2. Conceptual Build-up: Strengthening Watershed Development

Approach

Rural poverty is mostly associated with recurrent occurrences of drought, poor

maintenance and degradation of natural resources. Degradation of land and water

resources particularly in the semi arid areas has led to adverse economic and

ecological consequences in contemporary rural society, where survival, sustenance

and growth are intimately linked to the health and productivity of the surrounding

natural resources. In the recent past, several interventions were made to reduce

poverty through drought-proof technologies. Transition in climate and degradation of

Natural Resources is one of the reasons for the increasing popularity of the Watershed

Development approach. Watershed Development has huge prospects in transforming

rural lives and looks into a holistic process of:

Introducing new knowledge and technology.

Appreciating, maintaining and adapting traditional knowledge.

Building effective exchange systems through a diverse set of institutional

arrangements.

Building and strengthening specific, responsive, accountable and adaptive

systems.

Although in general ‘guidelines’ and conceptual documents incorporate these

elements, specific focus on only one or two components have led to limited success in

fulfilling the major objectives of watershed development programmes. In this respect

specific attention needs to be given to further strengthen watershed development

approach. Some of the key issues highlighted for this are:

a) Addressing comprehensively the micro-drivers of change:

Watershed development projects have huge potential to address the micro-drivers

effectively. However the degree to which the various




7

drivers in the three major components of social-economic-ecological aspects are

comprehensively addressed in watershed development projects leaves much to be

desired. The degree to which these drivers are properly understood and incorporated

in watershed management plans will directly influence how much the project is able

to influence the various aspects of livelihood strategies.

Another important aspect is comprehensively looking both the supply side

enhancement measures and the demand side management measures in watershed

development programs. Focusing only on the supply side enhancement measures has

been unable to ensure sustainable and judicious use of the resources created. Demand

management through better socio-institutional capability, technological adoption etc.,

would need to be properly incorporated in the project design to impart sustainability

to resource management practices.

b) Watershed development and adaptive management

Watershed management has several characteristics which include:

Multiple stakeholders with multiple interests.

Complex ecological systems with a variety of land use.

High level of uncertainty and many unknown factors.

Watershed Development

Projects

Drivers of change: Soil and nutrient

properties Biomass availability Water availability Land use Social and institutional

capability Technological adoption Patterns of demand and

supply Natural resource usage

Economic status Energy availability

Influencing livelihood strategies

Agriculture Livestock Production of other

materials Labour and

migration Biomass Energy Landscape and

environmental management

Agro-ecosystem function




8

This makes watershed management a complex process requiring a learning

approach based on a process of experimental decision-making and monitoring.

Adaptive management has been developed to address these characteristics and ‘is

an approach for managing the complex systems based on incremental,

experiential learning and decision making, supported by active ongoing

monitoring and feedback from the effects of outcomes of decisions’. It involves the

process of building social capital among stakeholders for collaboration and

learning, and knowledge sharing among group members.

c) Watershed development with an Integrated Landscape Restoration Program

Watershed projects should be seen as means to put in sustainable land-use

planning. Landscape Restoration Approach (LRA) is a process that aims to regain

ecological integrity and enhance human well being in degraded landscapes. Key

aspects of LRA are that it focuses on:




9

Restoration decision on how best to restore functionality, that is, the goods,

services and processes that the different components of landscape delivers.

It recognizes that both the solutions to neither the complex land use problems

nor the outcomes of a particular course of action can be predicted accurately,

especially as ecosystems and land-use patterns change over time.

It recognizes the need for multi-solution approach to provide the practitioners

with sufficient flexibility to address the complex issues.

Landscape constitutes of different components and the pattern in which these

components are distributed makes each landscape a unique one. Based on the

location specificities landscape can be classified as agricultural landscape, pasture

landscape, forest landscape, or even more. In improving watershed management

approach the value of this framework is not only in clearly envisioning specific

restoration plans for each components but also in establishing the links with

different landscape component and its contribution for specific landscape

restoration.

d) Addressing groundwater in watershed development projects

In context of Rajasthan more than 80% of water requirement are met from

groundwater sources. However in most of the watershed development programs

interaction with this important aspect leaves much to be desired. Groundwater

exploitation problems can be classified under two broad problems:

I. Aquifer Overexploitation (Overdevelopment): Aquifer overexploitation or

overdevelopment is prolonged process of groundwater withdrawal from an

aquifer leading to persistent falls in groundwater level as the rate of

withdrawal is more than the average annual replenishment rate.

II. Groundwater mining: Groundwater mining can be used for those

situations of groundwater use where aquifer is having a predominantly

non-renewable resources and the reduction in aquifer reserves is essentially

permanent.




10

In both these situations an adaptive approach to management has to be adopted,

recognizing the risks and uncertainties at the outset to reduce subsequent conflicts.

Unplanned depletion of groundwater reserves can undermine, and potentially

erode, the economic and social vitality of the traditional groundwater-dependent

community and instances of the collapse of such rural communities are known.

Hence, there is need to plan the exploitation of groundwater resources, and guide

their utilization with a view to making communities better socio-economically

prepared for coping with increasing water stress due to depleting aquifer storage.

Groundwater management can be widely classified as:

i. Unplanned exploitation and depletion

ii. Planned exploitation and depletion.




11

iii. Planned exploitation and recovery.

In

Rajasthan, a mix of ‘ii’ and ‘iii’ strategies is required to cope with the looming crisis. In

areas where the geological settings are such that low recharge rates are prevalent

‘planned exploitation and depletion’ needs to be put up in consultation with all the

stakeholders. In such scenarios based on the supply side characteristics ‘planned

recovery’ can also be put up. In regions where geological setting promote recharge

regulated use with supply side enhancement measures can help in not only reducing

the trajectory of the fall of groundwater in given time frame but also will be able to

ensure that the system recovers after depletion to an optimum state.

e. Developing a comprehensive governance agenda

Conservation, protection and judicious use of resources depend on establishing strong

governance function at the community level. Crafting and strengthening strong

community institutions is the first critical aspect of this process. These institutions at

the first level ensure the sustainability of site level restoration actions, which with the

capacity building and enthused collective actions can also translate in governance

function on other components of landscape. Simultaneously, there is also a need to




12

strengthen institutions which can take up governance agenda to a higher scale from

these ‘micro level’ institutions.

The 73rd amendment to the Constitution of India has entrusted the Panchayats with

29 functions enabling them to be effective governance institutions. Therefore

capacitating the Panchayats to be resource/knowledge centers in terms of not only

developing them as institutions which have adequate knowledge of the resources

they inhabit, but also centers of planning and regulatory bodies in close association

with micro-level institutions can set in strong sustainability to community based

natural resource management plan. The proposed second layer of institutional

structure therefore can also be associations of Panchayats and micro-level institutions

governing an area which they associate themselves with in social-economical-

ecological terms. Also keeping in the complexity of such process, there is a need for

these institutions to involve experts, different government departments, other

agencies and local leaders in setting up an effective governance structure.




13

3. Project Purpose, Objectives and Outcomes:

The broad purposes of the project are:

a. Strengthen the capacity of village institutions and Panchayats to implement

and support watershed development plan.

b. Restore functionality of different landscape components comprehensive

approach to conservation to deliver intended goods and services.

c. Restore ecological integrity by increasing flow of nutrients, water and biomass

across the landscape with improved biodiversity and stabilized production

systems.

d. Increase household incomes through strengthening current livelihood

strategies, introducing new ones and diversifying sources of income.

In this context, the objective of the project would be:

To assist village communities in obtaining tenure on public land or usufructs

and initiating strengthening systems of collective management and governance

over land and water, in a contiguous area to draw on the advantages of its

ecological and social structure.

To increase the availability of biomass through revegetation of the marginal

lands and increased availability of surface and ground water through soil and

moisture conservation and retention measures.

To assist communities in effectively integrating animal husbandry, agriculture

and natural resources management and in regulating the demand for biomass

and water through rules, regulations and mechanisms evolved by community

institutions at village and inter village levels

Landscape planning and management brings the conservation fully into the

rural development discourse by highlighting the importance of ecosystem

services in supporting continued agricultural production. It emphasizes both




14

the need and the opportunity to foster synergies among conservation,

agricultural production, livestock production and rural livelihoods.

To strengthen the village level and meso-level governance of biomass and

water resources by village communities, including involvement of Panchayats

in addressing natural resource management along with other initiatives of the

Government, Multilateral agencies.

To promote partnerships between the village communities, academia, civil

society and district administration that collectively envision, develop and

implement land use plans for the conservation and judicious use of natural

resources.

To promote convergence by implementing watershed works in private land

through different ongoing development schemes.

Implementation of the project for seven years would result in the following

outcome:

Strong collective management by village institutions over their landscape, with

appropriate tenure arrangements, in contiguous areas in each location. As the

setting and level of discussion in each of the institutions would vary, processes

on appropriation and production would be at different levels of maturity and

intensity. However, processes on integration of various components of the

ecosystem, an assessment of their status and a proactive course of action would

be evolved by the communities within and across habitations.

Improved biomass and biodiversity of common lands and increased

availability of surface as well as recharge of ground water.

Effective integration of animal husbandry, agriculture and natural resources

management and the demand for biomass and water regulated through rules,

regulations and mechanisms evolved by communities at village and inter

village levels.




15

Village level and meso-level governance of biomass and water resources by

village communities, strengthened along with the involvement of Panchayats,

government, civil society, other agencies etc.

Landscape planning and management engaging different actors (scientific

experts, professionals and village communities) in an informed, iterative and

participatory planning process. This planning process through understanding

alternative future scenarios helps to encourage informed discussions of

alternatives. The discussion leads to a landscape plan that is adaptive in terms

of implementation, monitoring and learning.




16

4. Area Details:

4.1 Geographical Profile: Jahazpur is situated between 7502’50”E to 75027’ 42” E and 25021’6” N to 25046’23” N.

Located in the north east of Bhilwara district, the Tehsil shares its boundary with

Ajmer district in the north and Shahpura, Kotri and Mandalgarh tehsils of District

Bhilwara on the other sides. It has an average elevation of 334 mts from mean sea

level. The average annual temperature ranges between 28-32C and rainfall ranges

between 280-630 mm. Spanning over an area of 7191 ha, the project area encompasses

fourteen villages in five of the Panchayats of the Tehsil. The topography is both

undulating as well as plain. The district is a part of the Banas (9157.2 sq km), Chambal

(1164.9 sq km) & Luni basin (133.0 sq km).

4.2 Geological Profile:

The main rock types found in the area are Migmatite, Composite Gneiss, Granite,

Granite Gneiss, Biotite Schist and Calc-silicates. The minerals found are mainly

quartz, feldspar, pyroxene, amphibole, biotite, apatite, muscovite, fluorite, tourmaline

etc. The presence of fluoro-apatitie and the presence of tourmaline is the main

indicator for presence of fluoride which is dissolved in ground water. The soil in this

area is also contaminated in terms of fluoride due to presence of fluoride minerals in

rocks.

Hydrogeology of the area – The water table pattern shows a more or less flat

hydraulic gradient with a general trend of north east direction of ground water

movement. The rock type is almost same throughout the area with fracture and

disintegrated zone. One hundred sixty six wells have been monitored for post

monsoon water table. The water levels in the wells have been collected and

simultaneously latitude, longitude and altitude have been marked through Global

Positioning System (GPS). These locations have been plotted in GIS and water table

with respect to mean sea level has been calculated. On the basis of water table data,




17

Water table map has been generated with 3 meter contour interval. This map shows

that the regional trend of ground water movement is towards north east direction in

this area and has been shown in the map. Almost all the area is moderate to low

recharge area, but with a comparative analysis, the south west area is more recharge

prone than the north east and the rest of the area.




18

4.3 Ecological Profile:

Ecosystem Types of Jahazpur

In a good mosaic of natural and man-engineered ecosystems is found in the

landscape. Thus, the major ecosystem types of whole of Jahazpur area can be broadly

classified into:

1. Natural Ecosystems

Terrestrial Ecosystem

Forest Ecosystem

Grassland Ecosystem

Aquatic Ecosystem

Fresh water Ecosystem

Lentic (Standing-water like ponds/lakes/Reservoirs)

Lotic (Running-water of non-perennial rivers)

2. Man-engineered Ecosystems

Cropland Ecosystem

Farmland Ecosystem

Agro forestry/Orchard Ecosystem

Grassland Ecosystem

Grassland ecosystem is a type of terrestrial ecosystem. Grasslands occupy

comparatively huge stretches of landscape approx. Nearly 9% of the area is under

permanent pastures. These grasslands are at degradation stage of tropical dry

deciduous forests. Both types of grasslands are found in the district. In Jahazpur area,

Dicanthium-Cenchrus-Lasiurus Grassland is found.




19

Table 1: Grass species present in the area

Flora &Fauna

In hilly area, where forest cover is better, Apluda mutica is seen growing in

abundance. This is an annual tall grass that can grow under partial shade up to some

extent. Along moist shady streams, Ammania pentandra, Bergia ammanoides,

Cyperus rotundus etc grass can be seen. In the plains, Prosopis juliflora, Acacia

nilotica, Azadirecta indica, Acacia lucophloea, Butea monospermum, Anogeisus

pendula and related species, Date Palm along the drainage lines etc are found in

abundance.

The primary consumers are the herbivores feeding on grasses comprising mainly of

cow, buffalo, sheep, hare, blue-buck, mouse, millipedes, centipedes, ants,

grasshoppers, beetles, babbler, crow, Bulbul, etc. Besides, secondary consumers are

those who feed on herbivores. They are hyena, jackal, fox, lizard, snakes, mongoose,

etc. Hawks feed on small secondary consumers, thus becoming the tertiary

consumers. Decomposers active in decay of dead organic matter of different life forms

are fungi like Mucor, Aspergillus, Penicillium, Cladosporium, Rhizophus, Fusarium

etc., and some bacteria and actinomycetes. They bring about the mineral back to the

soil, thus making them available to the producers.




20

Pond/Reservoir Ecosystem

A pond as a whole serves a good example of a fresh water ecosystem. Jahazpur is a

drought prone area. Therefore, traditionally, ponds/reservoirs/water bodies have

been developed at many places to meet the water requirement/availability for

domestic consumption, irrigation use as well as livestock drinking during stress

period mostly. Coincidentally, these water bodies provide very good aquatic habitats.

Terrestrial animals like migratory birds also find solace for their breeding during

winter.

These ponds are a self-sufficient and self-regulating system. They are very rich in

basic inorganic and organic compounds, such as water itself, carbon dioxide gas,

oxygen gas, calcium, nitrogen, phosphates, amino acids, humic acid, etc. Some

proportions of nutrients are in solution state but most of them are present as stored in

particulate matter as well as in living organisms. Various organisms that constitute

the biotic component like Potamogeton, Hydrilla, Vallisneria, Utricularia, Azolla,

Lemna, Oscillatoria, Anabaena, Chlamydomonas, Spirula etc. A few insects and both

small and large fishes are found in various ponds or lakes.

Non-perennial River Ecosystem

Major rivers of Jahazpur is Banas. The river which was perennial 10 years ago has

become non-perennial now. Numerous small as well as large dams have been

constructed along the river. Not only this stored water provide water for irrigation

and drinking purposes of the people, the reservoirs act as pond/lake ecosystem as

well. Ecologically also, these water systems are very important. Several aquatic life

forms emerge during the period of water-flow, but as soon as they dry up in winter

and summer, the aquatic life suddenly disappears.

As they drive up, the entire tract of their courses glows with the shinning of sands.

Large deposits of gravels and pebbles also occur along the banks. The riverbeds of

some of these rivers are predominantly composed of hard rocks, exposed and literally




21

dead. Though some small life forms occur sporadically where the stagnant water is

found along the course.

Cropland Ecosystem

Cropland ecosystems are artificial or man-engineered, where, in order to obtain more

food, cloth, timber, medicines and other useful products, man becomes responsible

for the replacement of natural systems. To secure maximum production, man makes

much planned manipulations in the physico-chemical environment. These include

addition of fertilizers to soil, use of chemicals for disease control, proper irrigation

practices etc. Thus, a cropland ecosystem is an artificial system aimed primarily to

grow a single species of one’s choice.

We have ecosystems of dominant crop species like maize, jowar, wheat, bajra,

vegetables, etc. under suitable conditions of their growth and yield. It is generally

argued that in a natural ecosystem, the nature maximizes for gross production,

whereas in an artificial ecosystem, man maximizes for net production. In a cropland

ecosystem, there is not necessarily an increase in the total dry matter production of

the whole plants, but generally most of the production goes into grain and less into

leaves, stems and roots. Thus, in agriculture, there is an objective to achieve high rate

of production (P) of readily harvestable products with little standing crop (B) left in

the field for accumulation or we may say that there is a high P/B efficiency. Nature,

on the other hand, follows just the reverse efficiency, i.e. a high B/P ratio where the

standing crop is generally accumulated to its maximum.

The pattern of interconnectedness among different components of ecosystem:

Every ecosystem comprises of two major components: Abiotic and Biotic. They are

intricately inter-twined and dependent on each other, and ensure a delicate but

complex ecological linkage leading to nutritional and energy flow through various

trophic levels both within and between ecosystems. The pattern of inter-

connectedness among different components of ecosystems therefore, lies in its explicit

recognition of complexity, interaction, functional processes and change over time.




22

Functionally, there is a constant exchange of matter and energy between the physical

environment and the living community. Structurally, different components of

ecosystems can be represented as follows:

Abiotic Component

These include the climatic conditions such as rainfall, temperature, wind velocity,

frost, hail, humidity etc. are suitable for the above mentioned crops, especially

maize.

Biotic Component

The various living organisms in the food chain are as follows:

o Producers:

The dominant plant species would naturally be Zea mays, Urad, Jowara and

Till. A number of weeds like Cynodon dactylon, Launnea nudicaulis,

Euphorbia hirta, Cyprus rotundus, Digitaria Spp., Alysicarpus spp. also

contribute to primary production of the field.

o Consumers:

Primary consumers are herbivores represented by a variety of animals, big as

well as small. The smaller animals include chiefly the insects as aphids, trips,

beetles, etc. which feed and lay their eggs on maize leaves. Larger animals are

rabbits, rats, birds and man feeding on leaves, flowers and fruits of maize.

Secondary consumers are carnivores like frogs and some birds that eat insects.

Tertiary consumers are carnivores like snakes and hawks which feed on the

secondary consumers: frogs and small birds. Decomposers are microbes

present in soil as well as air that decompose the dead organic matter of plants

and animals. These are chiefly bacteria, Actinomycetes and fungi responsible




23

for decay, decompositions and humification making the minerals available

again to the producers.

Interdependence of different Ecosystems:

Consequent to the manipulation and exploitation of the natural environment by

tremendous human pressure, the natural ecosystems are shrinking and gradually

vanishing into oblivion. Natural ecosystems have been reduced to a few isolated

pockets. Despite this, they still possess or support various food chains within the

system and, in turn, are inter-linked with various other adjoining systems. On the

other hand, man-made ecosystems predominantly occupy the landscape of the project

area. The extensive agricultural fields spread across the area. Food and fodder

security being the major concerns, the system is intensively manipulated as well as

managed by the individual owners.

There exists a general spatial, functional, temporal and complex interdependence

among these ecosystems. Most of the forestlands /Banni (Forest Ecosystems), Gorges

(Lotic Ecosystems) and community-owned & protected plots (Protected & Managed

Grassland Ecosystems) are found in the upper ridges of the hill ranges, while other

ecosystems like ponds/lakes/reservoirs (Lentic Ecosystems), agricultural land,

orchards (Cropland Ecosystems) occur in the low-lying flat lands or valleys in the

area. Though the forests are highly degraded, they provide such benefits to local

people as fuel wood, fodder, fruits, apart from ecological services like interception of

surface run-off, etc. thus, ensuring moisture conservation, ground water recharge,

alleviation of soil cutting &loss, minimizing siltation in reservoirs in the down-stream.

As a cascading effect, the water availability in rivulets, streams, reservoirs and

agricultural fields is enhanced and prolonged. Usually, biological processes and

activities in forest ecosystems are more complex, indicative of higher level of

successional ecological stage. Micro-organisms and microbial activities are found

more in the system, disintegrating and decomposing dead plant and animal and their

parts, helping the system recuperate with nutrients. During precipitation or storm,

some of the nutrients reach the valley area through the flowing water. Consequently,




24

the fertility of the agricultural lands is increased, which, in, turn, pushes up the

agricultural land productivity.

Being a drought-prone area with poor average annual rainfall and scanty forest

coverage, major livelihood source of the people is rain-fed agriculture and animal

husbandry. Major crops grown are coarse grains like maize, jowar, which are, in

addition to, being hardy, less water demanding and typical food-habits of dry land

areas, very good fodder crops, especially their leaves and succulent stems. But the

bulk of fodder requirement is mostly fulfilled from Common grasslands. There is,

therefore, tremendous dependence on grazing land. Years of unregulated grazing

have adversely affected the grassland ecosystem. From sustainability point of view,

these lands have been brought to the brink of highly degraded wasteland. Of late,

farmers, particularly big and medium ones, are maintaining a portion of their field as

‘private bids/ grassland’ for meeting fodder for both bovine and small ruminants.

This acts as important secondary source to meet requirement and complementary

adaptive management Therefore, fodder requirement is also increasingly being met

from private agricultural lands.

Farmers, again, use dung cake and pellets as manure in their fields to raise the fertility

as well as productivity. This way, the livestock pressure on commons and forestland

is mitigated. Furthermore, water in reservoirs/ponds is mostly used for drinking

purposes (human and livestock) and irrigation for Rabi crop. So, there is, clearly, a

symbiotic linkage among these systems.

4.4 Land Use Profile

As per the revenue records of these fourteen villages, only 333 ha of land is irrigated

while the remaining is rainfed. Around 9% of the total land area has been categorized

as pasture land. However, the availability of pasture land across the project villages

varies significantly with villages like Baori and Teetora Mafi having more than 10%

pasture land while Gulabpura has only 1.4% of the land as pasture land. Further, the

area does not have forest land. Bilanaam nakabil kasht and bilanaam kabil kasht form

other major land categories in the area.




25

Map 2: Land use/ land cover map of Jahazpur

Nearly 75% of the land in the area is current fallow. 0.3 and 6.3 percents of the land

are scrub and degraded forest, and other wasteland respectively. Only 1.5 percent of

the area is double/ triple cropped. There are mainly 8 types of land use/land cover

which have been identified from the Land Sat Imageries. Current fallow forms the

largest part of the land area. Nearly 75% lies as fallow in the project area. 7.3 and 7.5

percent of the land is cultivated only in Kharif and Rabi respectively. About 100 ha of

land constituting 1.5% of the land area is double/ triple cropped. Scrub/ degraded

forest land constituting about 1.7 and 6.3 percent of the area respectively can be

prominently seen especially in Taswariya and Baori which is situated in the south

west region of the project area.




26

4.5 Edaphic Profile:

Soil of Jahazpur generally comes under great a group which is dominated by antisols

& alfisols of having brown color in domination. It ranges from dark brown to light

pale brown & grey color. On the basis of texture of soil, Jahazpur soils can be

classified in to sandy loam to clay loam. In this type of soil, percolation of water is

good to medium. Most of the soils are calcareous in nature generally this calcareous

layer is found between the 50 to 100 cm. In some patches saline and alkaline soils are

also found. Organic carbon in the soil in Jahazpur ranges from 0.15 to 0.67%. Nitrogen

in surface layer is generally low across the physiographic region in the area where as

P2O5 and K2O is medium. In general N and P status of intensively cultivated in plains

and valleys is relatively low and K is high compared to hills and pediments. Available

Cu and Mn are generally adequate, whereas available Zn and Fe is low to marginal. In

Vindhyan and Aravali available micronutrient is generally high in valley/plain as

compared to hills and pediment. However available micronutrient is generally low in

intensively cultivated area of eastern plain.

Soil depth

Soil Depth suggests the volume of soil from which roots can acquire nutrient and

water for their growth. In Jahazpur district moderately shallow soil constitute 37.3%,

moderately deep to deep 27.2%, besides rock outcrops is 13.73 %.

Texture

It affects soil characteristics directly or indirectly and gives an idea of soil water

retention, availability of water to plants, soil genesis, infiltration rate, and drainage

and crop suitability class. Particle size class distribution of soil of Jahazpur shows

predominance of fine loamy to fine soils (63.8%). Surface textural class distribution in

soils of Bhilwara shows predominant sandy loam soils (46.8%) followed by sandy clay

loam to clay (36%). Sandy loam soil constitutes more than 50% in Aravali landscape

and eastern plain.




27

Soil Erosion

Soil of Jahazpur is moderately to severely eroded mainly by rivers and nallahs, mostly

during the rainy months. Besides, stagnation of water has given rise to the problem of

salinity and alkalinity.

4.6 Socio-Demographic Profile:

The project area consists of a total population

of 11905 with nearly 33% of the population

belonging to the Scheduled Caste and

Scheduled Tribe communities. The sex ratio

in the area is 963. The area has a low level of

literacy of 37.63% as compared to 50.74% at

the district level. With the female literacy

rate being a mere 18.44%, the status of

literacy in the area is one of the indicators of

the deplorable plight of the women in the

area.

As per the baseline survey conducted in the fourteen villages of the project area, there

are 2969 households with a total population of 11688. The size of the villages vary

from less than 100 households in villages like Gulabpura, Jaswantpura, Thagariya and

Bheempura to more than 350 households in Titodi Mafi, Titodi and Bavdi. Some of the

predominant communities inhabiting the area include Gujjar, Reger, Meena, Bheel,

Khatik, Jat, Rajput, Vaishnav, Brahmin, Naik and Nath. As high as 56% of the households

belong to Other Backward Classes while 34% of the households hail from

communities categorized as Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes.

Age-wise distribution of the population shows that children and youth constitute a

significant portion of the population. This indicates that efforts to channelize the

Table 3: Demographic Profile of Jahazpur Project Area, 2001

POPULATION 2001

Total population 11905

Male Population (%) 50.94

Female Population (%) 49.06

Sex ratio (female per thousand males) 963

% Population of Scheduled Caste 21.54

% Population of Scheduled Tribe 11.83

Literacy rate Total (percent) 37.63

Literacy rate male (percent) 56.11

Literacy rate female (percent) 18.44

Source: Government of Rajasthan and Census of India




28

Figure 1: Age-wise distribution of population Source: Baseline Survey (2010)

Figure 2: Mean Income from different sources Source: Baseline Survey (2010)

energies of these people and tapping

their untapped potentials would

lead to an improved quality of life

and the overall development of the

area. Simultaneously, while 28% of

the population are in between 35-60

years of age, a mere 8% of the total

population are above 60 years. One of

the most direct inferences that one

can draw from this figure is that the

status of health is poor in the area

and effective measures need to be undertaken to address the health related issues. The

status of health and sanitation in the area is poor. Presence of fluoride in the water

beyond the permissible limits is one of the most important concerns in this area.

Dental fluorosis and skeleton fluorosis are two of the most common diseases which

the people in the area suffer from. Instances of fluorosis and disability is high

particulary in the villages like Baori, Bheelri, Teetori and Teetora Mafi where the

fluoride concentration is high (Annexure 1). Absence of effective measures to address

this has aggravated this.

4.7 Livelihood Profile

Agriculture and animal husbandry

have been central to the livelihoods of

the people living in this area.

Frequent occurrences of drought in

the recent years has however,

increased the vulnerability of the

farming communities. Increased

pressure on land, decline in the




29Figure 3: Distribution of landholding categories Source: Baseline Survey (2010)

productivity of agricultural land combined with shrinking of forests and common

pasture land has threatened the viability of farming as a primary livelihood option in

the area.

Only 45% of the income is derived from farming and the people have to resort to

other options for sustaining their families. Low levels of literacy, absence of

programmes for developing skills particularly in the non-farm sector and limited

access to basic infrastructural facilities and services has impinged on the people’s

right to choose the best livelihood option. Migration can be seen as a prominent

phenomenon with nearly 13% of the income coming from migration. Launch of

MGNERGA has helped in generating employment in the area with about 13% of the

income of the people being derived from working on MGNREGA sites.

Development Indicators:

Sl.No. Development Indicators State Project area

Per Capita Income 16260 12660

Poverty Ratio 0.22 0.37

Literacy % 0.60 0.58

Sex Ratio 921 933

4.7.1. Agriculture

Land and water resources have been the key drivers of farm based production

systems which form the predominant source of livelihoods of the people in this area.

The area is characterized by land

based economy. Land has also been

crucial in defining the social and

political relations of the people in the

area. 25% of the households are

landless while 55% are small and

marginal farmers. With very low

landholdings and subject to vagaries of




30

nature agriculture remains a high risk-

low input-low output activity.

The area mostly has sandy loam to

clay loam soil where the percolation of

water ranges from good to medium.

Most of the soil is calcareous while in

some patches, saline and alkaline soil is also found. The soil is moderately to severely

eroded mainly by rivers and nallahs. Substitution of organic fertilizer with chemical

fertilizer has further worsened the soil quality. The nature of agriculture and farming

practices is also strongly conditioned by the availability of water. Depletion in the

surface as well as ground water resources has adversely affected agriculture. Some of

the villages in the area have access to canal and tank irrigation; wells are the most

common source of irrigation. The farmers mostly use engine to draw water for

irrigation from wells. Besides, flood irrigation is a common practice that can be found

in the area.

Kharif is the main cropping season in the area. Major cereals grown during Kharif

include maize, bajra and jowar. Crop production during Rabi remains limited to such

farmlands which have access to irrigation. Wheat is the main cereal crop grown

during Rabi. Besides cereal crops, pulses, fodder crops like rajka and oilseeds such as

groundnut and mustard are also cultivated in the area. Over the years, the

agricultural practices have undergone a remarkable change in the area. Besides the

traditional plough, tractors are also being increasingly used. Chemical fertilizer is

used intensively. The types of seeds, pesticide and fertilizer across the different

villages in the area are detailed in the tables below:

Table 4: Households Accessing Different Sources of Irrigation

Villages Wells Tanks Borewell Canal Baori 257 7 2 3

Bheelri 87 1 0 0

Bheempura 51 0 0 0

Gandher 190 49 1 49

Gokulpura 24 0 0 0

Gulabpura 21 0 0 0

Indokia 138 47 0 0

Jaswantpura 13 1 0 0

Maganpura 142 1 0 0

Sihana 49 16 0 0

Dhagariya 58 0 0 0

Taswariya 157 32 4 28

Teetori 212 8 0 2

Teetora Mafi 96 1 0 0

Total 1495 163 7 82

Source: Baseline Survey (2010)




31

Table 5: Households following various agricultural practices for maize

Village Seed from home

Hybrid seed Certified seed

Chemical pesticide

Organic pesticide

Chemical fertilizer

Baori 295 21 76 68 8 293

Bheelri 101 7 8 23 6 99

Bheempura 64 12 5 11 3 64

Gandher 190 24 24 53 18 187

Gokulpura 78 6 5 22 2 71

Gulabpura 40 5 1 3 0 41

Indokia 169 29 25 53 19 171

Jaswantpura 49 7 1 10 1 47

Maganpura 142 14 13 51 12 141

Sihana 74 9 6 18 5 65

Dhagariya 31 2 1 6 2 30

Taswariya 134 17 34 27 13 132

Teetori 131 20 57 43 19 131

Teetora Mafi 75 51 69 69 56 115

Total 1573 224 325 457 164 1587


Table 6: Households following various agricultural practices for wheat

Seed from home Hybrid seed

Certified seed

Chemical pesticide

Organic pesticide

Chemical fertilizer

Baori 226 33 51 50 6 221

Bheelri 63 12 5 12 2 64

Bheempura 40 6 1 8 0 38

Gandher 132 25 23 41 13 137

Gokulpura 61 8 2 17 0 60

Gulabpura 32 8 2 3 0 35

Indokia 112 24 21 33 11 117


Maganpura 83 18 8 27 5 85

Sihana 40 10 3 9 2 39

Dhagariya 17 6 0 2 1 19

Taswariya 85 23 28 17 9 89

Teetori 91 15 43 20 12 89

Teetora Mafi 37 8 10 10 2 36

Total 1047 202 197 256 63 1055




32


Table 7: Households following various agricultural practices for Jowar/Bajra


Certified seed

Chemical pesticide

Organic pesticide

Chemical fertilizer

Baori 30 6 7 17 3 30

Bheelri 14 2 3 4 3 15

Bheempura 7 1 0 2 0 5

Gandher 26 10 12 15 6 31

Gokulpura 10 1 0 2 0 8

Gulabpura 6 1 1 0 0 7

Indokia 30 10 15 16 10 34


Maganpura 25 2 3 8 2 23

Sihana 8 2 2 1 1 6

Dhagariya 2 1 0 1 0 2

Taswariya 18 8 10 10 8 17

Teetori 15 9 11 13 10 18

Teetora Mafi 6 1 1 2 1 5

Total 202 55 65 92 45 205 Source: Baseline Survey (2010)

Table 8: Households following various agricultural practices for groundnut


Certified seed

Chemical pesticide

Organic pesticide

Chemical fertilizer

Baori 7 0 2 1 0 5

Bheelri 6 0 1 2 1 7

Bheempura 0 0 0 0 0 0

Gandher 8 2 0 2 0 5


Gulabpura 3 0 0 1 0 2

Indokia 8 1 2 1 0 9


Maganpura 5 0 0 0 0 5

Sihana 4 0 0 1 0 4

Dhagariya 2 0 0 0 0 2

Taswariya 3 0 1 1 0 3

Teetori 1 0 0 1 0 1




33

Teetora Mafi 3 0 1 0 0 3

Total 57 4 7 11 1 54


4.7.2. Livestock

Agriculture supplemented with livestock keeping forms the basis of sustenance for

the farmers in this area. Crop residue and grazing provides fodder and forage to

livestock. Livestock keeping on the other hand acts as a drought power and source of

energy, nutrition and manure. The symbiotic relation between the two systems is

clearly visible and change in one has a direct impact on the other. As per the baseline

survey, livestock rearing contributes 17% of the income of the people in the area.

The livestock composition shows that smaller ruminants are more than the larger

ruminants. However, the number of cows is much higher than other animals in the

area. Degradation of common grazing lands and frequent occurrences of drought in

the recent years has raised serious questions pertaining to fodder security in the area.

Loss of vegetative cover as a result of high degrees of soil erosion and overgrazing has

adversely affected the productivity of these common grazing lands. Changes in the

cropping pattern along with the substitution of organic fertilizer with chemical

fertilizer reduced the fertility of the soil as well as the quality of fodder available from

crop residue. Further, frequent occurrences of drought leading to crop failure also

affected the fodder availability from crop residue which has increased the pressure on

the already overexploited common grazing land. The factors mentioned above have

not only led to a decline in the productivity of the livestock but have also increased

instances of distress sale of livestock.




34

Figure 4: Distribution of BPL and APL households Source: Baseline Survey (2010)

4.7.3. Poverty Trends

As per the baseline survey, there are 991 households

below poverty line in the area which constitutes

33.4% of the population. The percentage of BPL is

higher in villages like Gulabpura, Indokia,

Taswariya and Titodi as compared to the other

villages of the area. The table shows the

distribution of BPL households across the

different social categories. The proportion of BPL to APL households is higher among

those belonging to the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes as compared to other

communities. Nearly 53% of the households hailing from the Scheduled Castes are

below poverty line in this area as compared to 23% in case of those belonging to the

General category.

Table 9: Livestock composition in Jahazpur

Cow Buffalo Sheep Goat

Baori 648 229 462 674

Bheelri 252 137 99 131

Bheempura 110 84 279 166

Gandher 717 260 436 380

Gokulpura 205 113 432 177

Gulabpura 90 25 8 65

Indokia 657 275 319 499


Maganpura 484 217 90 218

Sihana 529 191 132 401 Dhagariya 295 128 75 157 Taswariya 828 353 818 972 Teetori 710 342 282 503 Teetora Mafi 471 268 606 450

Total 6217 2678 4399 4982 Source: Livestock Census, 2008




35

In an economy which largely demands skilled manpower, lack of skill enhancement

opportunities is an added disadvantage for the people in this area. Most of the people

in the area who have resorted to non-farm employment end up as daily wage earners

in the nearby cities. The ones who migrate to

cities have to leave their families back in the

village as their earning in the city is not able

to substitute returns from farm but only

supplement it. As per the baseline survey,

about 18% of the households in the area

migrate. Migration to cities and towns is

usually in mining and quarrying,

construction and in some small trading and

manufacturing work.

4.7.4. Livelihood Needs of the People:

As per the baseline survey, the livelihood

needs of the people in the area are as

follows:

Table 11: Training requirements of the people in the area Agriculture 437

Animal Husbandry 174

Computer 328

Dairying 103

Driving 31

Electrical Works 2

Household Industry 58

Kasidakari 134

Land Development 1

Mechanic works 8

Mid-Wife Training 1

Mobile Repair 1

Others 240

Poultry farming 37

Stitching 529

Total 2084


Table 10: Households Migrating

HH % of total

HH Baori 74 18.23 Bheelri 18 12.41 Bheempura 10 10.64 Gandher 40 14.93 Gokulpura 14 14 Gulabpura 6 12 Indokia 41 15.13 Jaswantpura 9 13.85 Maganpura 39 16.46 Sihana 22 15.94 Dhagariya 17 21.25 Taswariya 66 19.64 Teetori 91 22.75 Teetora Mafi 88 23.22

Total 535 18.02 Source: Baseline Survey (2010)




36

Table 12: Households that indicated a need for various land development activities and physical interventions

Village Land

Development Farm

Bunding Farm Pond

Continuous Contour

Trench (CTT) Check Dam Anicut

Baori 0 317 91 15 2 12

Bheelri 0 101 15 13 9 10

Bheempura 2 70 24 4 25 5

Gandher 36 198 35 0 5 19


Gulabpura 0 37 19 4 1 21

Indokia 1 139 3 0 0 3


Maganpura 113 187 124 89 139 131

Sihana 1 85 1 0 0 0 Dhagariya 0 57 33 1 1 4 Taswariya 10 245 27 34 3 19 Teetori 0 298 24 2 1 12 Teetora Mafi 28 210 62 1 77 37

Total 192 2041 460 163 263 273

Source: Baseline survey (2010)

Table 13: Households that indicated a need for new well or well deepening

New Well Well Deepening

Baori 43 132

Bheelri 22 58

Bheempura 20 36

Gandher 71 90

Gokulpura 24 23

Gulabpura 6 13

Indokia 11 93

Jaswantpura 12 13

Maganpura 173 168

Sihana 7 47

Dhagariya 8 19

Taswariya 56 75

Teetori 40 146

Teetora Mafi 80 94

Total 573 1007





37

Table 14: Households that indicated the need for various agriculture-related services

Villages Crop

Exhibition Live

Fencing Seed

Production Vermi

Compost Gypsum

Application Nursery Farm

Implements Plant

Protection

Baori 3 185 1 4 242 39 27 0

Bheelri 4 84 0 0 93 10 14 0

Bheempura 37 51 2 10 57 14 29 2

Gandher 0 51 3 2 54 7 21 7

Gokulpura 0 59 0 0 35 1 0 0

Gulabpura 0 17 1 6 22 17 6 2

Indokia 0 133 0 0 77 15 1 0

Jaswantpura 0 32 0 0 25 1 0 0

Maganpura 112 118 113 112 154 121 133 119

Sihana 0 84 2 0 56 12 0 0

Dhagariya 11 43 0 0 24 0 2 0

Taswariya 9 126 2 5 90 34 8 4

Teetori 3 287 0 0 255 80 31 0

Teetora Mafi

12 203 49 64 170 71 81 50

Total HHs 191 1473 173 203 1354 422 353 184


Table 15: Households that indicated a need for irrigation facilities

Villages Pipeline for Irrigation Sprinkler irrigation Drip Irrigation

Baori 85 1 16

Bheelri 40 8 2

Bheempura 27 12 6

Gandher 107 11 18

Gokulpura 0 0 0

Gulabpura 12 4 3

Indokia 37 0 4

Jaswantpura 0 0 0

Maganpura 151 126 130

Sihana 21 1 5

Dhagariya 15 0 0

Taswariya 40 3 8

Teetori 38 0 6

Teetora Mafi 110 75 82

Total 683 241 280





38

Table 16: Households that indicated a need for breed improvement services

Villages Cow Breed

Improvement Buffalo Breed Improvement

Goat Breed Improvement

Sheep Breed Improvement

Baori 116 203 65 3

Bheelri 58 91 32 8

Bheempura 44 50 35 5

Gandher 141 239 64 11

Gokulpura 35 48 57 34

Gulabpura 13 25 19 1

Indokia 36 32 28 5


Maganpura 185 196 153 126

Sihana 40 40 37 12

Dhagariya 15 58 5 2

Taswariya 95 112 94 19

Teetori 122 190 61 9

Teetora Mafi 314 311 131 28

Total HHs 1240 1621 809 280


Table 17: Households that indicated a need for various livestock related services

Villages Fodder Improvement Artificial Insemination Livestock Insurance

Baori 3 80 93

Bheelri 1 19 62

Bheempura 6 4 40

Gandher 6 33 38

Gokulpura 0 22 2

Gulabpura 1 0 2

Indokia 0 95 3

Jaswantpura 0 18 0

Maganpura 119 118 152

Sihana 0 49 0

Dhagariya 0 0 1

Taswariya 6 16 76

Teetori 4 201 157

Teetora Mafi 17 27 40

Total HHs 163 682 666





39

Table 18: Households that seek information and capacity building services

Villages No. of HHs that want Information

Services No. of HHs that seek Capacity

Building Services

Baori 250 239

Bheelri 93 69

Bheempura 23 14

Gandher 19 7

Gokulpura 0 30

Gulabpura 45 45

Indokia 46 122

Jaswantpura 0 19

Maganpura 111 110

Sihana 36 59

Dhagariya 9 2

Taswariya 190 190

Teetori 73 140

Teetora Mafi 2 17

Total HHs 897 1063


Table 19: Households that indicated a need for resource center in their village

Villages Number of HHs

Baori 198

Bheelri 46

Bheempura 10

Gandher 5

Gokulpura 1

Gulabpura 44

Indokia 13

Jaswantpura 0

Maganpura 110

Sihana 7

Dhagariya 0

Taswariya 139

Teetori 15

Teetora Mafi 1

Total 589





40

Table 19: Households that indicated a need for SHG and Consumer Group

Study Village SHG CG

Baori 87 34

Bheelri 27 7

Bheempura 27 1

Gandher 52 10

Gokulpura 55 45

Gulabpura 36 0

Indokia 136 91

Jaswantpura 39 33

Maganpura 128 114

Sihana 81 41

Dhagariya 1 0

Taswariya 66 3

Teetori 97 74

Teetora Mafi 127 30

Total 959 483


5. Elements of Work 5.1 Ecologically sound regeneration

While Nature functions as a fairly independent system and could perhaps rejuvenate

and reach an equally good state in the long run, the direct and immediate impact of

the degradation of natural systems would decimate several species and severely affect

the poor who depend on natural surroundings for their survival. Moreover the scale

and extent of degradation of the natural surroundings and the inadequate attention

that such fundamental concerns receive in development planning brings us face-to-

face with a situation where concerted action is necessary to halt and reverse such

trends. We also observe that ecological degradation is mostly caused by social and

economic factors necessitating an interdisciplinary action in safeguarding Nature. A

few of the phases of ecological restoration inculcates in (i) assisting village

communities in protecting their forests and grazing lands to enable natural

regeneration of the existing rootstock and (ii) assessing the stock and flow of biomass,

biodiversity and water across natural and production systems so as to place the




41

relevance of the efforts on regeneration and bring to the table an informed discussion

around the permissible levels of extraction so as to draw strategies for conservation

action.

5.2 Institutional mechanism

Good governance has been seen as a panacea to make development efforts

meaningful for the citizens - that which enables citizens and communities to fulfill

their lives and destinies, enable people to create sustainable livelihoods for

themselves, facilitate the fulfillment of basic needs, and promote an attitude of self-

reliance. Institutional process involve in strengthening, nurturing and reviving of

village institutions and working towards enabling them to gain a sound legal foothold

on the natural resources, where it is uncertain or disputed, and where a legal

provision exists.

5.3 Building dialogue and discussion

We know that any progress will require a complex of social, political and economic

changes. The challenge ahead is to synergize scientific and technological innovation

with a much greater capacity for institutional innovation. Such innovation and

change relies to a large extent on the effectiveness with which a diversity of

stakeholders with different interests and from different sectors and scales can interact.

In such a context, there is an increasing recognition that governing a landscape is no

longer solely the domain of government. Evidences show that due to the complexities

of socio-economic and political environments government cannot govern forest and

nature on its own. The rapid processes of decentralization and devolution that is

taking place around the world indicates the need to shift towards collaborative

governance in which various actors (e.g. governments, local communities, local

entrepreneurs and civil society) are expected to co-manage resources such as forest

and nature.




42

Although multi-stakeholder processes (MSPs) are based on recognising the

importance of achieving equity and accountability between stakeholders, win-win

solutions are not always possible. The complexity of issues and stakes, across different

levels and timescales, may lead to a negotiated compromise in which win-lose or even

lose-lose solutions have to be accepted. In such situations it is critical to understand

the role of the state as (at least in theory) the protector of the common good for the

long-term. Policy makers often find themselves caught between their public service

duties, short-term electoral interests and the splintered interests of different

stakeholder groups.

Setting up and facilitating long term processes that bring different groups into

constructive engagements, dialogue and decision making towards good governance

of the landscape. Processes that aim to involve stakeholders in improving situations

that affect them; forms of social interaction that enable different individuals and

groups, who are affected by an issue, to enter into dialogue, negotiation, learning,

decision making and collective action; about getting government staff, policy makers,

community representatives, scientists, business people and NGO representatives to

think and work together.




43

6. Components of Work

6.1 Capacity Building and Community Mobilization

Training and exposure enhances knowledge, skill, attitude and human relationships.

Though, a number of measures had been taken in this regard, experiences show that

the training programmes should aim at (i) strengthening those processes, skills and

knowledge that help in the delivery of various watershed development activities; (ii)

improving the quality of watershed management and its governance iii) providing

more number of relevant trainings involving more community participation

particularly rural women and; (iv) strengthening the various habitation level

institutions by promoting traditional practices of good governance mechanism of

Natural Resources.

6.2 Work on landscape component 6.2.1 Work on arable land

Arable land constitutes ha of the total project area. The area has minimal slope and

is less undulated. The community primarily depends on agriculture and animal

husbandry for sustaining their livelihoods. Discussions with community and

intensive survey revealed that these areas are prone to soil erosion due to runoff,

wrong agronomic practices and poor vegetation. As soil depth is moderately low and

regular erosion of valuable top soil has its impact on not only decreasing the

productivity levels but also raising the question of sustainability of the most critical

production system. Presently there is least physical measures to retain soil moisture

for longer periods which leads to increasing exploitation of groundwater for irrigation

and for poor farmers frequent crop failures due to lack of water availability at

different phases of crop growth.

Work to restore the functionality of this component of landscape will involve not only

intensive physical treatment but also regular discussions and awareness building of

the communities to adopt better agronomic practices like rotational cropping, use of




44

green/organic manure, agro-forestry etc., Focus will be to increase the productivity of

each land unit per drop of water which not only help in raising farm incomes both in

terms of food grains and fodder but also leads to sustainable and judicious use of

resources.

Physical treatments planned constitute of measures to harvest water which provide

soil moisture for longer periods. The physical treatment measures will also aim to

minimize soil erosion under safe levels. Activities planned to address these includes

farm ponds, farm bunds, gully plugs and loose boulder check dam keeping in view

the parameters like soil depth, slope, vegetation, erodibility and rainfall.

6.2.2 Work on non arable land

These are the most degraded portions in the landscape with very low productivity

due to continuous process of soil erosion which has in many pockets completely

removed the soil cover. Lack of any physical treatment measures, very low vegetative

cover and prolonged neglect to effectively manage them, has led to non functionality

of this landscape component to provide any substantial goods and services which

have played a critical role in sustaining farming and livestock systems in semi arid

conditions. These landscape components also play a critical role in nutrient and water

transfer and have a organic link with private lands. The project will intensively focus

on these common and private wastelands to build spaces for poor who mainly

depend on these marginal lands to meet their resource needs. Restoration of these

lands will also aim to strengthen the intricate link these have with the low lying farm

lands and strengthen ecological security.

The physical activities planned will address two main components of regeneration

and soil and water conservation. However crafting and strengthening strong

institutions which can establish strong governance on these lands will be the key to

sustainability of these physical measures.

Regeneration Activities:




45

On village grazing lands: the project plans to regenerate ha of Panchayat

grazing lands with appropriate mix of trees and grasses.

On revenue lands: The project aims improve the productive capacity of the

ha of revenue wastelands which have been subject to acute degradation.

Efforts would be made to increase the soil moisture regime by appropriate soil and

moisture conservation activities such as:

Contour Trenching

Earthen gully plugs

Loose Boulder Check Dam

6.2.3 Drainage line treatment

Stream orders of 1, 2 and 3 are present in the project area. Firstly it is observed that

due to minimal slope sheath erosion is very prominent leading to extensive

siltasion in the drains. Secondly the drainage density combined with geological

understanding of the area shows a high recharge potential in the area.

The project aims in this context to further enhance the recharge with combination

of various physical measures to check water flow and harvest water. The project

also aim to enhance the availability of surface and ground water through the

construction of various water harvesting and recharge structures such as:

Masonry Check Dam

Earthen structure

Gabions

Stone slab structures

The structures primarily aim to check runoff, soil erosion and enhance recharge.

These structures also have been aimed to serve as structures for livestock drinking.

6.3 Livelihood promotion activities




46

Poverty alleviation programme is not an exclusive entity but will necessarily include

dynamic nature and integration of range of context specific interventions. Poverty

itself is an abstract phenomenon and requires sensitization of beneficiaries,

implementers and the policy workers. Collective associations will be basis of

intervention strategy. Diversification of livelihood alternatives with ecological and

social considerations will be the guiding principle. Skill enhancement will open new

opportunities to strengthen the employment options.

Poverty alleviation programme should closely knit the concurrent context specific

realities and then draw a household specific dynamic plan which can be updated in

the subsequent stages, since the intervention requirement will change automatically.

The major challenge is poverty among working people. The poor needs a number of

(new) employment opportunities to come out of the poverty.

6.4 Use of Non conventional energy:

Energy conservation with Bio-Gas:

Energy conservation programme under the watershed project is associated with multi

lateral objectives. This is not only use of non conventional energy source, but

recycling the dung cakes will ensure further additional benefits to farm production.

Use of Pressure cookers & Energy efficient Solar lights:

Efficient energy usage will be promoted by promoting usage of pressure cookers,

Solar lights with additional multipurpose facility will be promoted to popularize the

use of non convention energy and diversify the dependency on multiple energy bases.




47

CHAPTER V Year-wise Plan for 5 Panchayat




48

Annexure Water Quality of Jahazpur Project Area:

Water quality is a very broad subject as it is affected by a plethora of factors. A study

was undertaken wherein samples were collected from different wells and hand

pumps in the project area. pH, electrical conductivity, total dissolved solids, salinity,

dissolved oxygen, fluoride concentration and turbiity at different temperature were

tested using various reagents and instruments.

The result of the analysis is as follows:

MAP4: Location of Sample collection in Jahazpur Project area




49

Table2: Water Quality data for Jahazpur Project Area.

pH Levels in Surface and Groundwater Wells

The trends in pH in Jahazpur project area are clear with definite patterns. To begin

with, the normal pH values for drinking water should be from 6.5-8.5 (Freeze, 1979).

The lowest obtained pH value is 6.58 and the highest is 7.9. pH levels are highest in

the wells around the northeast part of the watershed and in the southern part (mainly

in Gandher, Gulabpura and Bheelri). (ref: Map 5). Wells with low pH values are in

the middle of the watershed (in the rest of the villages). Additionally, pH differs

between sub-surface aquifer groundwater and surface well water. The surface water

wells ranged from being acidic to basic whereas the deep groundwater from the hand

pump was basic with high pH values. Possible reasons for these trends are differences




50

Map5: pH in Ground water of Jahazpur project area.

in ion concentrations in the different wells. Wells with high pH values are near farms,

which are also rich in ions that come from fertilizers as well as the crops planted in

the fields. The alkaline nature of the fields that are rich in minerals add to the high

pH of well water. Ground water was also full of alkaline minerals possibly because

water percolating through the ground to the deep aquifers is exposed to a number of

ions and minerals in the soil. Thus, most of the wells have normal pH values. High

pH values in some of the wells could be due to the ions in the minerals that shift the

equilibrium of hydronium towards the hydroxide side. The low pH values are due to

an increase in the hydronium ion in well water. Water with high pH content is called

hard water (Freeze, 1979). Hard water is not adverse to health, but in large quantities,

it poses some health risks. Other effects of hard water are deposits in faucets or pipes

as well as a slight bitter taste in water (EPA, 2010). Low pH water under the value of

six is called soft water. Soft water could contain trace metals such as copper, mercury,

and lead. These metals are harmful to health and the acidic soft water is very

dangerous should not be used for drinking purposes (EPA, 2010). Thus, the high pH

in the wells and the groundwater by itself will not pose any significant health risks,




51

Map6: Salinity map in ground water of jahazpur project area.

but will change the taste of the water as well as leave deposits of various precipitates

when the water is collected. Soft water in some of the wells is very dangerous to

health as it fosters the growth of bacteria and many diseases (Freeze 1979).

Additionally, soft water with low pH values can corrode pipelines or pumps over

time. Water from the lower pH wells is not suitable to drink because of a higher

probability of bacterial growth in these wells.

Salinity Levels in Surface and Groundwater Wells

Map 6 depicts the distribution of salinity in wells in the Jahazpur project area. Salinity

is basically a measurement of all the salt concentrations in the water such as sodium

chloride, magnesium chloride, magnesium sulfate etc. The soil is not rich with

different ions because there are no fields there and the vegetation is sparse.

Drinking water with salinity of 100 ppm is the norm for drinking water, and salinity

up to 500 ppm is acceptable in many situations (EPA, 2010). Salinity must stay below

500 ppm if the water is for drinking. For irrigation purposes, it is ideal if salinity is

lower than 2000 ppm (EPA, 2010). The maximum salinity obtained is 10700 ppm in a




52

hand pump which is much greater than normal acceptable one. But this is a case for

only one hanpump and the reason may be the occurrence of local salt dome beneath

the surface. Otherwise the maximum salinity in the open wells is 2500 ppm and

minimum is 400 ppm.

The salinity is more in the villages of Gulabpura, Bheelri, Maganpura and some part

of Teetora mafi and rest of the area is acceptable in terms of salinity of the ground

water for drinking water purpose.

Conductivity in Surface and Groundwater Wells:

The conductivity of the watershed as depicted in map 7 is a measure of ion

concentration in the wells of the area. Data from the field indicates that conductivity is

very low in the north eastern side of the project area (mainly in Gandher village) and

increases drastically towards the south western side (Taswariya village). The wells in

the northern side have the lowest conductivity, whereas in the central and south

western portion, the water has the highest conductivity in the watershed. The second

trend indicates an increase in conductivity from the surface water to the groundwater.

Groundwater from the hand-pump has a very high conductivity while most of the

surface wells in the watershed have a comparatively lower conductivity.




53

Map7: Electrical conductivity map of Jahazpur project area.

The reasons for variations in conductivity lie in the nature of conductivity itself.

Conductivity is a measure of the ease with which electrons can flow through a

substance. Conductivity increases with the presence of ions in any solution. Hence,

water with the highest concentration of ions will have the highest conductivity.

Watershed well data shows that water towards the southern side of the watershed as

well as groundwater has higher conductivity than northern side and surface water

and this is due to the accumulation of ions in the water as it flows toward the rich

lowland soils. As this is also where farms are situated, fertilizers increase the ion

concentration in the ground and the conductivity of the wells near the fields is

increased. The groundwater is also rich in ions than surface water because of

percolation through the soil. As the water percolates down into the aquifers, the ion




54

concentration in the water increases as it is exposed to rich soil throughout the

lowlands of the watershed.

The effects of high conductivity on health are dependent on which ions are causing

the high conductivity. Ions such as nitrate and copper are very harmful in small

quantities while potassium and sodium require very high concentrations to be

harmful. However, conductivity must be below 0.5 mS/cm in general for drinking

water (EPA, 2010). Wells with conductivity of 1.1 mS/cm, are potentially harmful for

people.

Dissolved Solids in Groundwater:

The total dissolved solids in each of the wells of Jahazpur watershed is shown in map

8. There are two trends of importance in this map. The first, total dissolved salt

values increase from Eastern side to the western side. Secondly, groundwater in

Gulabpura, Bheelri has more dissolved salts than rest of the area. Well water in the

Gandher is devoid of ions and minerals because soil in this area may be without any

ions or minerals to enrich it. Therefore, the data show that wells in this area have low

total dissolved solids. On the other hand, are rich in minerals and ions, which are

associated with extensive vegetation and farms that exist in this region of this

watershed area and these minerals are present in wells. Groundwater will also have

relatively larger total dissolved solids than surface well water. Groundwater is

surface water percolated down through the soil and into sub-surface aquifers. Ions

accumulate in the water as it percolates down in to the sub-surface aquifers.

Additionally, groundwater at the drainage basin, where the hand-pump (WT5) is

located, will be full of salts due to the coming together of all the salt rich streams in

the watershed or may be due to presence of salt dome locally.




55

Map8: Total Dissolve solid map of Jahazpur project area.

The impact of total dissolved solids on health is dependent upon solids that are

dissolved in the water. The recommended concentration limit by the U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency of total dissolved solids is 500 ppm (Freeze, 1979).

The highest value in the project area is about 8580 ppm. By these standards, water in

some wells of the watershed is harmful for drinking.

Temperature in Surface and Groundwater:

Temperature itself is not a health risk but may lead to many health hazards. High

temperature waters are breeding grounds for many kinds of bacteria. Additionally,

temperature is inversely associated with pH and dissolved oxygen content, which

may affect the quality of water in question. But in case of the studied area, the

temperature is almost varying from 28 to 30 degree Celsius which is not harmful.

Dissolved Oxygen in Groundwater:




56

The dissolved oxygen content of wells in the project area is represented in map9. The

dissolved oxygen content is very high in Gandher, Maganpura, Gulabpura, part of

Teetori and Bheelri. There are handpumps (WT5, WT20) in the area those have a very

high dissolved oxygen content. As a whole, however, the dissolved oxygen content of

wells is high in the above mentioned villages and low everywhere else in the

watershed.

Map9: Dissolve oxygen in ground water in Jahazpur project area.

Temperature is related to dissolved oxygen content very closely. When temperature

is low, the dissolved oxygen content is high. The dissolved oxygen itself may not

determine the quality of water. Oxygen is harmless when dissolved in water and so

the dissolved oxygen concentration cannot deteriorate water quality. Additionally,

high dissolved oxygen content is needed to sustain aquatic life and there is a higher




57

Map10: Turbidity map of ground water in Jahazpur project area.

chance of bacterial contamination as well. Thus, dissolved oxygen content is related

to other characteristics of water that may directly affect water quality in the wells.

Turbidity of the Water:

Turbidity is the cloudiness or haziness of a fluid caused by individual particles

(suspended solids) that are generally invisible to the naked eye, similar to smoke in

air. The measurement of turbidity is a key test of water quality. Fluids can contain

suspended solid matter consisting of particles of many different sizes.

While some suspended material will be large enough and heavy enough to settle

rapidly to the bottom of the container if a liquid sample is left to stand (the settable

solids), very small particles will settle only very slowly or not at all if the sample is

regularly agitated or the particles are colloidal. These small solid particles cause the

liquid to appear turbid.

In drinking water, the higher the turbidity level, the higher the risk that people may

develop gastrointestinal diseases [citation needed]. This is especially problematic for

immune-compromised people, because contaminants like viruses or bacteria can




58

become attached to the suspended solid. The suspended solids interfere with water

disinfection with chlorine because the particles act as shields for the virus and

bacteria. Similarly, suspended solids can protect bacteria from ultraviolet (UV)

sterilization of water. Governments have set standards on the allowable turbidity in

drinking water. In the United States, the allowable standard is 0.3 NTU, with many

drinking water utilities striving to achieve levels as low as 0.1 NTU.

In Jahazpur project area, (ref, Map 10) the turbidity varies from 0 to 10.5 NTU in

different places. Most of the area is having clear water in terms of turbidity while the

villages Baori, Bheempura, Maganpura and some part of Bheelri is having turbidity

more than normal which may be problematic in terms of human drinking.

FLUORIDE CONTAMINATION IN GROUND WATER OF JAHAZPUR PROJECT

AREA:

Water is most useful matter on the earth for all lives. Significance of water as natural

agent is not only determined by its availability on the surface of the earth but also

determined by its physical & chemical properties. High fluoride in drinking water is a

problem found on both the ground & surface of water. Water is universal solvent so it

has the capability to dissolve nearly all natural compounds. The chemical composition

of natural water is developed as the results of many diseases in men. Fluoride is

natural component of the earth crust and also found in many mineral, like fluorite,

fluoroapetite, etc due to high electronegative. Only fluoride form found in water.

Fluoride form sparingly soluble in natural water. It enhances the fluoride

accumulation of high fluoride concentration in soil & water due to this accumulation

of high fluoride concentration lead health problem in livestock. It has been reported

by health organization 5-8 as an essential substance in water for building healthy teeth

at level with in 1 mg/L concentration. The maximum permissible limit of fluoride in

water is 1.5 mg/L by WHO & ICMR. The effects of fluoride in drinking water have

been studied. Fluorosis is a most widespread geochemical disease affecting more than




59

66 million people including million children under the age of 14 year. The first

presentation of water quality slandered was made in 1914 by USPHS. The fluoride

concentration laid down by USPHS (1962) WHO (1963) and ICMR (1962). In India

nearly 177 districts in 19 states have been confirmed to be fluoride affected. In

Rajasthan out of 27 districts 16 districts have been confirmed fluoride affected area

and have more than permissible limit concentration of fluoride. In Jahazpur project

area almost 27 samples from different parts of the watershed have been collected and

analyzed with JalTara fluoride testing kit. This is a simple testing method where 50 ml

of sample water has been treated with 2.5 ml of zerkonyl alegarine (acid) and left for a

few hours.

Map 11: Fluoride contamination distribution map in Jahazpur project area.




60

The color changed due to the reaction between fluoride and the acid has been

observed and the color has been matched with the color matching code. It gives the

value of fluoride <1, 1 to 1.5, 1.5 to 3 and >3. With this kit all the 27 samples have been

analyzed and then the results have been mapped by using GIS with the location of the

sampling collected by the GPS. The following map (Map11) is the distribution of

fluoride contamination of ground water in different parts of Jahazpur project area. In

the map 11, the red colors are the area where fluoride even exceeds the upper

acceptable limit of the fluoride (>2.7 ppm). All the area in the color yellow to red is

not acceptable in terms of drinking purpose. Only few areas like Gandher, Gulabpura,

Teetora Mafi and few part of Taswariya is less affected by Fluoride contamination.

Rest of the part is severely affected with fluoride contamination. Out of 27 assessed

samples, 13 samples have fluoride more than 3 ppm and 3 samples have value more

than 1.5 ppm. Only, 11 samples out of 27 have fluoride contamination less than

1.5ppm which is the maximum permissible limit for drinking water.

Drinking water containing fluoride more than 1.5ppm causes dental fluorosis.

Drinking this water for a period of more than six months may cause skeletal fluorosis

which is an incurable disease. In such a case, the people in the project area are highly

affected with this disease and it has been evidenced from the local people whose teeth

have yellow layer (even the children) and many of them have curved legs.

Safe drinking water is one of the most important concerns for any developed,

developing or under developed country and in any social, economical or ecological

set up without considering the religion, caste or any other issues. Almost 50 percent

of diseases are due to unsafe drinking water contaminated chemically or biologically.

Non contaminated drinking water has emerged as one of the biggest challenges we

face today. In different parts of the world, fluoride and arsenic are the two most

common contaminations which cause different diseases and some fatal disease like

fluorosis which are not curable and very painful for the survivors for a long time.




61

In the present context, it has been evident that the drinking water quality in Jahazpur project

area is highly contaminated with fluoride and TDS, salinity are also high in different parts (as

describe in table2). Almost 50% of the assessed well have much more than the normal

fluoride content and people are drinking this water directly or using this for their cooking.

This may cause a health hazard for the people using this water for their domestic purpose

(drinking or cooking). Therefore it is highly recommended that possible solutions to this

problem be sought and people have safe drinking water. Since, it is a problem with the

occurrences of minerals and rocks, no direct process can solve the problem permanently.

However, there are a few possible solutions which are as follows:

1. Providing filter with Nalgonda technique to reduce the fluoride content in

drinking water.

2. Water supply through pipe line from nearby area where fluoride content is less

than 1.5 ppm.

3. Roof rain water harvesting as much as possible in the villages.

4. Campaigning and providing the information to the village community

regarding the contamination and the health hazard caused by this

contamination.

5. Water quality testing in each and every well or hand pumps which are being

used for drinking purpose.

6. Digging of deeper wells with proper casing by considering the depth of non

contaminated deeper confined aquifers after the detail study of the aquifers (as

geologically, there are some layers at deeper depth without presence of

fluoride minerals which do not cause the contamination in ground water at

different depths.)

Post Monsoon Water Table Data:

Sl.no Name of Farmer Village

Water Level (mt)

Elevation (mt) Latitude Longitude

Water Level

1 Sewa, Kamar Raju Taswaria 10.0 359 25.63 75.09 349.00

2 Gopal Taswaria 11.5 358 25.64 75.09 346.50

3 Kisan Teli Taswaria 10.2 359 25.64 75.10 348.80

4 Mohan Reger Taswaria 11.3 359 25.64 75.10 347.70




62

5 Dev lal Gujjar Taswaria 11.0 359 25.64 75.10 348.00

6 Mahavir Taswaria 12.0 359 25.64 75.10 347.00

7 Sugna Teli Taswaria 12.5 360 25.64 75.10 347.50

8 Ladu Das Taswaria 12.8 360 25.64 75.09 347.20

9 Gajanand Meena Taswaria 12.3 358 25.64 75.10 345.70

10 Mahavir Taswaria 13.5 359 25.64 75.09 345.50

11 Ramlal ji, Karan ji, Sakto ji Gujjar Taswaria 7.5 362 25.64 75.09 354.50

12 Debi Gujjar Taswaria 5.8 363 25.64 75.09 357.20

13 Jagdish ji, Shivji, Gopal ji, Sitaramji, Madan ji Taswaria 2.1 359 25.64 75.09 356.90

14 Prabhu ji,, Kailash ji Vashnav Taswaria 3.9 361 25.64 75.09 357.10

15 Gopal, Jagdish ji Vaishanav Taswaria 4.5 360 25.64 75.09 355.50

16 Rama Gulabpura 6.4 352 25.64 75.11 345.60

17 Viswaram Gulabpura 10.7 351 25.64 75.11 340.30

18 Gopal Gulabpura 6.4 352 25.65 75.11 345.60

19 Ranglal Gulabpura 5.8 354 25.65 75.11 348.20

20 Common Well Gulabpura 9.6 348 25.64 75.11 338.40

21 Mahavir Bheelri 9.4 351 25.64 75.12 341.60

22 Common Well Bheelri 10.7 353 25.65 75.12 342.30

23 Common Well Bheelri 6.4 352 25.65 75.13 345.60

24 Ladu Bheelri 0.0 351 25.66 75.12 351.00

25 Ramswaroop Bheelri 9.1 354 25.65 75.13 344.90

26 Chagna Teetori 9.4 349 25.67 75.13 339.60

27 Chagna Teetori 15.5 347 25.67 75.14 331.50

28 Rampal Teetori 10.1 350 25.67 75.14 339.90

29 Sarwan Teetori 13.4 353 25.67 75.14 339.60

30 Durga lal Teetoramafi 10.4 345 25.65 75.13 334.60

31 Common Well Teetoramafi 9.1 350 25.69 75.12 340.90

32 Ramswaroop Teetoramafi 8.5 350 25.69 75.13 341.50

33 Narayan Teetoramafi 11.6 350 25.69 75.13 338.40

34 Ratan, Rama, Kailash, Mahavir, Bhawar Bhopalpura 7.0 343 25.65 75.14 336.00

35 Gopal, Sampat Bhopalpura 6.4 339 25.64 75.14 332.60

36 Common Well Bhopalpura 1.5 341 25.64 75.14 339.50

37 Radheshyam Sadhu Bhopalpura 8.2 343 25.64 75.14 334.80

38 Ranmdev Dagaria 7.6 342 25.64 75.15 334.40

39 Baddi Bhopa Gujjar Dagaria 4.5 336 25.63 75.15 331.50

40 Ramkaran, Chandra Dagaria 6.1 338 25.65 75.14 331.90

41 Pappu Ramswaroop Dagaria 8.2 339 25.63 75.14 330.80

42 Common Well Gandher 5.8 343 25.69 75.17 337.20

43 Common Well Gandher 5.5 339 25.69 75.17 333.50

44 Sohan Dhakar Gandher 8.8 331 25.69 75.17 322.20

45 Chand Mal Jain Gandher 2.7 330 25.69 75.17 327.30

46 Ratan Dhakar Gandher 4.1 333 25.68 75.18 328.90

47 Ramlal Maganpura 9.1 335 25.70 75.15 325.90

48 Common Well Maganpura 13.7 339 25.70 75.16 325.30




63

49 Harchand Maganpura 10.7 338 25.71 75.16 327.30

50 Sukhlal Maganpura 11.0 347 25.71 75.16 336.00

51 Sonath Maganpura 11.6 346 25.70 75.16 334.40

52 Ramratan Bavdi 19.2 358 25.63 75.09 338.80

53 Banna Bavdi 13.8 357 25.63 75.09 343.30

54 Sonanarayan Bavdi 12.8 357 25.63 75.09 344.20

55 Mohan Bavdi 11.8 358 25.63 75.09 346.20

56 Jagganath Bavdi 11.7 370 25.63 75.09 358.30

57 Ramnarayan Bavdi 12.2 373 25.63 75.09 360.90

58 Bardi Bavdi 10.4 373 25.63 75.08 362.60

59 Narayan Bavdi 10.4 372 25.63 75.08 361.60

60 Rameshwar Bavdi 11.4 359 25.63 75.09 347.70

61 Bheru Gopalpura 7.9 341 25.70 75.15 333.10

62 Common Well Gopalpura 7.8 341 25.70 75.15 333.20

63 Ladu Gopalpura 6.4 340 25.70 75.15 333.60

64 Rameshwar Gopalpura 6.4 345 25.70 75.15 338.60

65 Ramkanya Gopalpura 7.9 347 25.70 75.15 339.10

66 Common Well Gokulpura 12.2 339 25.67 75.17 326.80

67 Japram Gujjar Gokulpura 12.2 339 25.67 75.17 326.80

68 Kalu Gokulpura 11.6 337 25.67 75.18 325.40

69 Nana Gokulpura 7.9 341 25.67 75.17 333.10

70 Chagna Sihana 7.9 341 25.61 75.13 333.10

71 Common Well Sihana 4.3 338 25.61 75.13 333.70

72 Common Well Sihana 10.7 351 25.61 75.13 340.30

73 Common Well Indokia 7.0 344 25.61 75.13 337.00

74 Kisan Teli Indokia 6.7 344 25.61 75.13 337.30

75 Sibaram Indokia 3.7 340 25.61 75.13 336.30




79 Sojiram Indokia 9.1 351 25.61 75.11 341.90

80 Gajraj Bheempura 14.9 339 25.64 75.16 324.10

81 Laduram Bheempura 10.9 351 25.64 75.16 340.10

82 Mewa Gujjar Bheempura 13.0 352 25.65 75.16 339.00

83 Pema Reger Bheempura 10.2 353 25.65 75.16 342.80

84 Ranvir Bheempura 11.9 354 25.64 75.16 342.10

85 Banna Gujjar Jaswantpura 11.8 343 25.64 75.16 331.20

86 Ramnath Jaswantpura 9.1 342 25.64 75.16 332.90

87 Balu Jaswantpura 10.1 344 25.65 75.16 333.90

88 Common Well Jaswantpura 11.6 342 25.65 75.16 330.40

89 Balu Jaswantpura 11.3 342 25.64 75.16 330.70

90 Common Well Pander 2.1 334 25.64 75.19 331.90

91 Common Well Pander 4.0 329 25.64 75.19 325.00

92 Rameshwar Laskar Pander 6.7 329 25.64 75.20 322.30

93 Narayan Kumhar Pander 6.4 332 25.64 75.18 325.60

94 Bajraj Saju Pander 9.4 332 25.64 75.18 322.60




64

MOU




65

ESTIMATES

Rational:

The IWMP Jahazpur watershed is located in the Jahazpur Tehsil of Bhilwara district. The

project team has done a thorough analysis of the project area based on secondary and

primary data. Some studies have also been undertaken to understand the geo-hydrology

and ecology of the area. Efforts have been to map the community needs to help the

communities in planning interventions in the villages.

The secondary data and the topographical survey of the area suggest that the overall

topography of the watershed area is flat with the majority of the area having a slope of

0-1%. The total geographical area of the watershed is 7191 Ha of which 63% area is

under agriculture. But the agriculture is largely rainfed with only 5.4 % under irrigation.

The farmers depend mainly on the open wells for irrigation. The secondary data suggest

that only 37.6 % of the people fall under the literate category. The total numbers of

household in the region are 2969 with a total population of 11905. The Schedule caste

and Schedule tribes form a significant portion of the overall population with 33%

belonging to these categories.

The ground water of the area has a high fluoride contamination with almost 50% of the

wells have fluoride contamination. This is hazardous for human health as well as health

of the livestock. The total livestock population is around 18276 which have a large

population of cows which is nearly 34%of the total population while the small

ruminants constitute 51% of the total livestock population.

The household survey helped in developing a better understanding of the villages and

helped in preparing plans for the area. The survey could through light on some of the

finer aspects of village life in the region. Looking at the overall income follows of the

area nearly 17% income comes form animal husbandry sector while the most prominent

is the agriculture which occupies nearly 28% of the total income. The total contribution

of wage employment in terms of MGNREGA, Wage employment in other place and

migration, total to around 32 % which indicate that the agriculture though being

significant in terms of the geographical spread does not account in a proportionate

manner when it comes of income. Nearly 25% of the households in the area are land less,

while 66% of the household come under the small, medium and marginal category. Only

9% of the farmers are large farmers. One of the most characteristic features of the area is

33.4% of the household are below poverty line. Nearly 53% of the Household under the

scheduled caste and tribe category are below poverty line. 18% of the households are

forced to migrate in search of better income generation opportunities.

During the survey and village meeting the kind of needs expressed by the village

communities are as follows:

Capacity building needs: Capacity building needs is generated in consonance

with the kind of occupation the people of the area have. Largely demands have

been to build the capacities under agriculture, AH, Dairying, Poultry farming,

Land development. However some of the people have also demanded for off

farm livelihood training such as Computer literacy, driving, electrical works,

midwifery training, mobile repair stitching and kasida kari.

I) Programmatic Interventions:

To supplement the above, it was found that Awareness building programs,

Institutional strengthening trainings, Exposure visits will be the tools to

capacitate and sensitize the community on various programs and policies,

strengthen the

Land based physical intervention: a large percentage of the people nearly 2501

households have come up with demands for farm bunds and farm ponds. People

have demanded for well deepening and new wells both for drinking water as

well as irrigation. In addition there are demands for soil and water conservation

activities on commons lands.

Agriculture and Agro culture based intervention: People in the area have

expressed there interest in improving the agro culture of the area with advance

agronomic practices. There have been cases where people have demanded for

new varieties being introduced in the area by means of crop demonstration. The

area has a scarcity of water thereby making people realize the importance of

water. People have demanded for support in improving the water transport and

irrigation systems in the villages by usage of pipes and water efficiency devises.

Livestock which is also significant for the area in terms of livelihood support has

also been a focus of the people who have demanded for breed improvement,

fodder improvement, AI, livestock insurance.

Savings also have gained importance in the area where people around 1000

household demanding for SHGs.

Based on these ground data following issues have been identified as key intervention

area for the region. These are:

Land development including farm lands.

Water harvesting to enhance availability for water.

Livelihood enhancement.

Skill enhancement.

Land development:

Arable lands: As part of the arable land treatment work activities such as farm bund

and farm pond have been planned for the in-into conservation of water. These would

enhance the soil moisture in the farm lands and will support critical irrigation during

situation of failure in monsoon during critical growth periods. In addition neem

plantation is being promoted in the farm lands to augment the fodder needs of the area

as well as enhancing the biomass availability in the region.

Common land: Pasture lands will be developed to enhance the availability of fodder for

the large livestock population of the area. This would also mean talking up plantations

of fodder trees on these pastures which would also suffice to the needs of the small

ruminants which is nearly 50% of the livestock population. Efforts would be undertaken

for the in-situ conservation of soil in the village commons by digging of contour

trenches.

Water Harvesting: The area is having acute water scarcity as well has 50% if it water

sources being contaminated with fluoride. Therefore there is an urgent need to harvest

water above ground and facilitate recharge of shallow wells to solve the problem of

drinking and irrigation water. For this a large proportion of the budget has been kept for

the purpose of creation of masonry dams and earthen water harvesting structures.

Provision has also been made to prevent siltation of these structures by construction of

loose boulder check dams on the drainages leading to these structures.

Production Enhancement and Livelihood activities for Asset less person: The

livelihood enhancement program is directed towards farm based intervention. Efforts on

one hand are to reduce the cost of intervention for farmers, improve the productivity

and increase the income both by market linkages and improved usage of byproducts. In

this are efforts would be made by promoting low external inputs based conservation

agriculture, promoting the concept of seed bank both for conservation of traditional

seeds as well as reduce market dependence for seed. To enhance the soil nutrition

attempts will be made to demonstrate the concepts of BD compositing and Pit

composing. These are all attempts to promote on farm production of quality manure so

that the agriculture shifts form inorganic to organic agriculture.

There was a demand for diversifying agriculture by promoting dry land horticulture.

Efforts will be made to promote Anar cultivation on 10 ha of land. These plantations

will be supported by water efficiency measures such as drip with horticulture. The area

also reflects physical deficiencies which are also subject to poor drinking water and lack

of nutrition. Therefore 55 kitchen gardens are being promoted for increasing the intake

of green leafy vegetable in the regular diet of the people.

To promote market linkages SHGs, Water user association and federation will be

capacitated to take up activities such agri-business. Activity such as vermin-composting

as a livelihood option for poor livestock keepers will be promoted. As a departure from

the normal thinking of Biogas as a energy saving device the project also uses this as an

option to add value to the cow dung by generating valuable energy, improved manure

and also would contribute towards reducing methane emissions.

To support the livestock based livelihoods there has been a demand for breed

improvement. The project plans to work on these aspects on three fonts:

Improving the herd by providing improved breeds of cows, buffalos and goats.

By Artificial insemination.

By providing natural service bull/bison/buck.

In addition the project will be promoting integrated livestock and dairy based

enterprises with people who have shown a strong inclination towards livestock

management. During meetings and surveys people explained the way they feed the

animals’ especially feeding of maize Stover’s. This is a very unscientific way where a lot

of feed is wasted and many a times the animal is also injured. Therefore electric chaff

cutters will be promoted to improve the fodder efficiencies as well will be an income

generating activity for the SHGs.

To promote energy conservation pressure cookers and solar light have been proposed as

demonstration. These will be given across different caste and class groups to facilitate in

scaling up of these initiatives.

Skill enhancement: The skill enhancement proposed is based on the needs to enhance

the income levels in different groups to support the households. These groups are:

Women and differentially abled group: activities such as tailoring and Kasida kari.

People have expressed needs to learn tailoring and Kasida kari as an activity that they

can pursue during their free period and can earn some money to support their financial

needs. The facilities for such training are also available in Bhilwara.

Skill enhancement of para workers: The project aims at building a cadre of technically

abled people in the field of Agriculture, Animal Husbandry, Soil and moisture

conservation activities, energy conservation, accounts. This is largely to address issues of

project implementation as well as post project sustainability issues.

Off farm skill building: People have expressed need for technical capability in the area

of hardware maintenance in case of mobile. This also is a good income generating skill

as mobile technology has become very popular in the villages. There are agencies that

are providing quality training ion this filed which have been contacted for providing

these training in the area. The number of people has been proposed based on average

two persons per village. Trainings to people for repair and maintenance of electrical

appliances has also been proposed. 7 flour mills have been proposed for remote villages

as the bigger villages have existing flour mills.

Panchayat Villages Area BudgetBaori Taswariya 707 8484000

Baori 791 9492000Total 1498 17976000

Titori Titori 991 11892000Dhagariya 369 4428000Bheelari 404 4848000Gulabpura 168Total 1932 23184000

Phalasiya Indokiya 188 2256000Sihana 106 1272000Total 294 3528000

Pandher Gokulpura 144 1728000Jaswantpura 64 768000Pander 120 1440000Total 328 3936000

Gandher Bhimpura 187 2244000Maganpura 645 7740000Gandher 1435 17220000Titoda Mafi 872 10464000Total 3139 37668000

Grand Total 7191 86292000

Village Wise & Panchayat Budget IWMP-II Jahazpur Watershed

Sl.No Micro No Name of Village

Area (ha) Total Area

1 1/1Gandher Bhimpura 187Gandher Maganpura 645Gandher Gandher 1435Gandher Titoda Mafi 872Titori Teetori 651Pander Gokulpura 144Pander Jaswantpura 64

2 3/4Pander Pander 120Titori Dhagariya 182

3 3/5Titori Dhagariya 60Titori Bheelari 220Titori Teetori 340Titori Gulabpura

4 3/6Baori Taswariya 707Titori Bheelari 452Titori Dhagariya 27Phalasiya Indokiya 188Phalasiya Sihana 106

5 3/8 Baori Baori 791 791Total 7191 7191

IWMP-II JAHAZPUR

3998

302

620

1480

Sl.No Village Area (ha)

Total Amount [Rs]

EPA Amount [Rs]

1 Bhimpura 187 2244000 897602 Maganpura 645 7740000 3096003 Gandher 1435 17220000 6888004 Titoda Mafi 872 10464000 4185605 Teetori 991 11892000 4756806 Gokulpura 144 1728000 691207 Jaswantpura 64 768000 307208 Pander 120 1440000 576009 Dhagariya 369 4428000 17712010 Bheelari 404 4848000 19392011 Taswariya 707 8484000 33936012 Indokiya 188 2256000 9024013 Sihana 106 1272000 5088014 Baori 791 9492000 37968015 Gulabpura 168 2016000 80640

Total 7191 86292000 3451680

Village Wise Budget & EPA detailsIWMP-II Jahazpur Watershed

Land_Detail_of_Jahazpur_revised

Sl.No. Villages

Total Geographic

al Area

Total Watershed

Area Irrigated UnirrigatedPasture

Land

Billanam Nakabil

KastBillanam

Kabil Kast Forest

Percentage(%) wise

bifurcation1 Gulabpura 356 168 7 87 2 42 30 0 472 Dagariya 399 369 32 203 36 55 43 0 923 Teetori 1123 991 38 639 99 80 135 0 884 Bheelri 404 404 15 175 35 107 72 0 1005 Taswariya 959 707 21 395 56 88 147 0 746 Baori 1335 791 39 414 81 139 118 0 597 Sihana 648 106 3 45 6 16 35 0 168 Indokiya 837 188 5 96 15 52 20 0 229 Gandher 1435 1435 50 886 105 218 176 0 100

10 Teetoramafi 870 872 10 563 119 88 92 0 10011 Maganpura 645 645 17 436 75 58 59 0 10012 Bheempura 187 187 3 136 16 13 19 0 10013 Pander 2611 120 4 60 18 24 14 0 514 Jaswantpura 293 64 1 48 6 6 2 0 2215 Gokulpura 400 144 1 122 9 6 6 0 36

Total 12502 7191 247 4305 679 993 968 0 58

Land detail of Jahazpur Project Area in ha

Foundation For Ecological SecuirtyF-33 Subhash Nagar(Extension East),Bhilwara-311001

Page 1

Sl.No. ITEM DETAILS1 Name of watershed IWMP-II2 Name of panchayat samiti Jahajpur3 Macro No 1 & 34 Micro No 1/1,3/4,3/5,3/6,3/85 Topographical area , Ha 71916 Area not available for treatment,pal, habitition,rasta etc 0

7 Effective area 71918 Average annual rainfall, mm 3509 From strange table proposition of estimated runoff by

given rainfall% of runoff to rainfall

i In good catchment 8.3ii In average catchment 6.2iii In bad catchment 4.1

Type of watershed Area of watershed, Ha

Factor in cum per ha

Expected yield, cum

Good 791 290.0 229390.0Average 3596 217.0 780332.0

Bad 2804 143.5 402374.0Gross Total water runoff in the watershed 1412096.0

Less 40% Water evaporation loss 564838.4Net water collection for watershed 847257.6

10

Sl.No. Name of structure No / Area Storage capacity in cum

Total storage, in cum

a Big structure 6 30000.0 180000.0b Small structure 7 9600.0 67200.0c Local depressions Considering 11% of

total expected yield155330.6 155330.6

Storage of water by existing structures 402530.611 Balance runoff = Expected yield - Present storage in

cum444727.04

12 Considering as per norms 75% of balance amount 333545.2813 Cosidering Average land slope,PRA

exercise,Recconaciance survey,GT sheet etc,The following proposed new measures

Sl.No. Type of structure / Measures No / Area Storage capacity per unit

Total Storage capacity in cum

Arable LandFarm Bunding 1045.5 90.0 94095.0Farm Pond (Puccka) 31 400.0 12400.0Land Development and RegenerationP. D. on Private Land 184.6 90.0 16614.0P.D. on Common Land 340 138.5 47106.9Open contour Trench 118 60.8 7168.5Earthen Dugout Pond 21 400.0 8400.0New Nadi 19 3300.0 62700.0Drainage Line TreatmentR.R Stone Masonary Structure 5 5184.0 25920.0Earthen Nadi/Dam with connected waste weir 15 4900.0 73500.0Planned storage of water by watershed interventions 347904.4

Conservation plannned for 3, 47,904 Cum water

Foundation For Ecological SecurityA-160,Subhash Nagar, Bhilwara,Rajasthan 311001

Water Budgeting of the watershed Area

Total water runoff in the watershedTable -1

Present storage of water by existing runoff structureTable - 2

Table - 3

Total Area 7191 HaTotal Sanction Amount 862.92 Lack

Sl.No. Budget component % of the Budget Units No/Ha Quantity Rate in Rs Budget in

LakhsUnits Budget Units Budget Units Budget Units Budget Units Budget Units Budget Units Budget Units Budget

0 2 20 21 20 20 170 0.9122514 7.814801836 8.179702406 7.87181755 7.87181755 6.7096092 39.36

1 Administrative costs 10 86.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.00 12.94 0.00 27.61 0.00 24.16 0.00 8.63 0.00 8.63 0 86.292 Monitoring 1 8.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.73 0.00 3.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.45 0.00 0.00 0 8.633 Evaluation 1 8.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.02 0.00 3.02 0.00 0.00 0 8.63

Sub-total (1+2+3) 103.55 0 0.00 0 4.31 0 17.26 0 31.07 0 27.18 0 15.10 0 8.63 0 103.554 Entry Point activity 4 34.52 0 0 0 10.24 0 24.27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.51

Total [4] 34.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.24 0.00 24.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 34.515 Detailed project Report 1 8.63 0 0 0 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.63

Total [5] 8.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.95 0.00 1.30 0.00 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.636 Institution and Capacity building 5 43.15

0.86 8.63 9.06 8.63 8.63 7.33 43.15a Awareness Programme No 58.00 0.08 4.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.00 1.13 16.00 1.28 18.00 1.44 10.00 0.80 0.00 0.00 58 4.65b Institutrional building No 39.00 0.20 7.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 2.00 9.00 1.80 9.00 1.80 11.00 2.20 0.00 0.00 39 7.80c Exposure visit [External] No 22.00 0.35 7.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 1.40 6.00 2.10 5.00 1.75 7.00 2.45 0.00 0.00 22 7.70d Exposure visit [local] No 26.00 0.15 3.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.00 1.05 5.00 0.75 8.00 1.20 6.00 0.90 0.00 0.00 26 3.90e Field training No 28.00 0.10 2.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.00 0.70 6.00 0.60 7.00 0.70 8.00 0.80 0.00 0.00 28 2.80f Padyatra/ Campaign No 5.00 0.75 3.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.75 2.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 5 3.75g Vaternary and Health Camp No 26.00 0.25 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 1.23 8.00 1.96 7.00 1.72 6.00 1.47 0.00 0.00 26 6.37h SHG Capacity building No 25.00 0.08 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.32 7.00 0.56 8.00 0.64 6.00 0.48 0.00 0.00 25 2.00i Sinages,wall painting, boards No 28.00 0.08 2.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.32 8.00 0.64 8.00 0.64 8.00 0.64 0.00 0.00 28 2.24j Audit (Physical,financial and social) No 24.00 0.08 1.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.48 6.00 0.48 5.00 0.40 7.00 0.56 0.00 0.00 24 1.92

Total [6] 281 43.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 61.00 8.63 73.00 11.67 76.00 11.04 71.00 11.80 0.00 0.00 281.00 43.13

Sub-Total (4+5+6) 86.28 0 0.00 0 17.19 61 34.20 73 12.05 76 11.04 71 11.80 281 86.27

7 Watershed development works 60 517.757.a Arable Land 7.18 0.14 1.44 1.51 1.44 1.44 1.22 7.18a Farm Bunding Ha 1045.50 0.13 139.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 122.00 16.23 255.00 33.92 215.38 28.65 238.00 31.65 215.12 28.61 1046 139.05b Farm Pond (Puccka) No 7.00 1.34 9.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.34 3.00 4.03 2.00 2.68 1.00 1.34 0.00 0.00 7 9.39c Farm Pond (Kaccha with poly bag) No 24.00 0.73 17.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 2.92 7.00 5.10 5.00 3.65 6.00 4.37 2.00 1.46 24 17.50d Regeneration No 782.00 0.02 15.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 195.00 3.90 195.00 3.90 196.00 3.92 149.00 2.99 47.00 0.94 782 15.65

Total (7.a) 181.59 0 0.00 0 0.00 322 24.38 460 46.94 418 38.89 394 40.36 264 31.01 1859 181.59

7.b Land Development and Regeneration 9.83

0.20 1.97 2.06 1.97 1.97 1.67 9.83a P. D. on Private Land Ha 184.60 0.097 17.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.60 3.26 44.00 4.27 39.00 3.88 36.00 3.49 31.00 3.01 184 17.91b P.D. on Common Land Ha 340.00 0.43 144.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 93.00 39.62 77.00 32.80 88.00 37.49 52.00 22.15 30.00 12.78 340 144.84c Open contour Trench Ha 118.00 0.07 8.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 39.00 2.73 20.00 1.40 18.00 1.26 19.00 1.33 22.00 1.54 118 8.26d Earthen Dugout Pond No 21.00 0.62 13.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 2.50 7.00 4.37 5.00 3.12 4.00 2.50 1.00 0.62 21 13.10e New Nadi No 19.00 1.67 31.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 6.68 3.00 5.01 4.00 6.68 7.00 11.69 1.00 1.67 19 31.73f Repair of Nadi No 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00g Repair of Anicut No 3.00 8.00 12.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 3.13 2.00 7.41 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.80 4 12.34

Total (7.b) 0 228.18 0 0.00 0 0.00 174 54.78 152 50.98 156 59.83 118 41.16 86 21.42 686 228.187.c Drainage Line Treatment 6.61

0.13 1.32 1.39 1.32 1.32 1.12 6.61a LBCD No 337.50 0.056 18.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 71.00 3.98 96.00 5.38 75.50 4.23 95.00 5.32 0.00 0.00 338 18.90b Gabions No 19.00 0.492 9.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 1.97 7.00 3.44 5.00 2.46 3.00 1.48 0.00 0.00 19 9.35c R.R Stone Masonary Structure No 5.00 10.674 22.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 3.50 1.00 3.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 15.52 5 22.60

d Earthen Nadi/Dam with connected waste weir No 15.00 3.809 57.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 11.43 3.00 11.43 2.00 7.62 3.00 11.43 4.00 15.24 15 57.14

Total (7.c) 0 107.99 0 0.00 0 0.00 79 20.87 107 23.83 83 14.31 101 18.22 7 30.76 377 107.98

Sub-total (7.a+7.b+7.c) 517.76 0 0.00 0 0.00 575 100.04 719 121.75 657 113.03 613 99.74 357.12 83.19 2921 517.75

8 Production Enhancement & Livelihood activities for the asset less persons 15 129.44

8.a Women / differentially abled centered micro enterprise 0.18

0.00 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.18

a Skill Enhancement (Stiching/Tailoring/Kasidakari) 57.00 0.09 5.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.00 0.72 15.00 1.35 10.00 0.90 10.00 0.90 14.00 1.26 57 5.13

Total [8.a] 57 5.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.00 0.72 15.00 1.35 10.00 0.90 10.00 0.90 14.00 1.26 57.00 5.138.b Livestock & Dairy management 25.89

0.52 5.18 5.44 5.18 5.18 4.40 25.89a Cow/Buffalo Rearing No 30.00 0.325 9.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.98 8.00 2.60 8.00 2.60 4.00 1.30 7.00 2.28 30 9.75b Goat Rearing No 125.00 0.064 7.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.00 0.95 32.00 2.03 24.00 1.52 30.00 1.91 24.00 1.52 125 7.94c Fodder Innovatioin & management No 56.00 0.025 1.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.00 0.18 18.00 0.45 12.00 0.30 13.00 0.33 6.00 0.15 56 1.40d Breed Improvement [AI] No 887.00 0.00150 1.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 98.00 0.15 181.00 0.27 183.00 0.27 220.00 0.33 205.00 0.31 887 1.33

e Cattle services by Natural service in Buffalo (Bull) No 8.00 0.30 2.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.30 3.00 0.90 1.00 0.30 1.00 0.30 2.00 0.60 8 2.40

WORK PLAN OF IWMP WATERSHED DEVELOPMENT PROJECT TEH. -JAHAZPUR DISST.- BHILWARA

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Total

f Cattle services by Natural service in cow (Bull) No 9.00 0.25 2.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.25 3.00 0.75 1.00 0.25 3.00 0.75 1.00 0.25 9 2.25

g Cattle services by Natural service in Goat (Service Buck) No 9.00 0.11 0.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.11 1.00 0.11 3.00 0.33 3.00 0.33 1.00 0.11 9 0.99

Total [8.b] 1124 26.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 126.00 2.91 246.00 7.11 232.00 5.58 274.00 5.24 246.00 5.22 1124.00 26.068.c Energy conservation 11.65

0.23 2.33 2.45 2.33 2.33 1.98 11.65a Bio-gas No 40.00 0.21 8.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 2.05 10.00 2.05 8.00 1.64 9.00 1.85 3.00 0.62 40 8.20b Pressure cookers No 116.50 0.02 2.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 24.00 0.41 21.50 0.37 29.00 0.50 23.00 0.40 19.00 0.33 117 2.01c Energy efficient light No 80.00 0.02 1.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.00 0.31 12.00 0.22 22.00 0.40 15.00 0.27 14.00 0.25 80 1.44

Total [8.c] 237 11.65 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 51 2.77 44 2.64 59 2.54 47 2.51 36 1.19 237 11.65

8.d Skill enhancement of Para workers/ individuals on agreed sectors 0.56

0.01 0.11 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.10 0.56

a Skill development of Para-workers per training cost

159.00 0.08 12.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.00 2.24 33.00 2.64 34.00 2.72 32.00 2.56 32.00 2.56 159 12.72Total [8.d] 159 12.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.00 2.24 33.00 2.64 34.00 2.72 32.00 2.56 32.00 2.56 159.00 12.72

8.e Agriculture 1.190.02 0.24 0.25 0.24 0.24 0.20 1.19

a Low External Input for Sustainable Agriculture (LEISA)

Ha 180.00 0.04 6.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 46.00 1.67 46.00 1.67 43.00 1.57 42.00 1.53 3.00 0.11 180 6.55b Fodder Demo Ha 12.00 0.37 4.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.10 3.00 1.10 4.00 1.46 2.00 0.73 0.00 0.00 12 4.39c Grain / Seed Bank No 5.00 0.70 3.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.70 2.00 1.41 1.00 0.70 1.00 0.70 0.00 0.00 5 3.52d BD Composting No 61.00 0.01 0.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.00 0.20 12.00 0.17 18.00 0.26 14.00 0.20 3.00 0.04 61 0.87e Pit Composting No 72.00 0.01 0.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.00 0.16 8.00 0.08 24.00 0.24 13.00 0.13 11.00 0.11 72 0.72f Integrated Farm Model No 5.00 1.74 8.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.74 3.00 5.23 1.00 1.74 0.00 0.00 5 8.72

Total [8.e] 330 24.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 80.00 3.84 72.00 6.18 93.00 9.46 73.00 5.04 17.00 0.26 335.00 24.788.f Horticulture 0.44

0.01 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.44a Horticulture Farm of Anar with drip No 10.00 0.64 6.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 1.28 4.00 2.56 3.00 1.92 1.00 0.64 10 6.40b Kitchen garden No 57.00 0.05 2.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.00 0.33 12.00 0.57 15.00 0.71 15.00 0.71 8.00 0.38 57 2.71

Total [8.f] 67 9.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.00 0.33 14.00 1.85 19.00 3.27 18.00 2.63 9.00 1.02 67 9.118.g Efficient Irrigation 5.18

0.10 1.04 1.09 1.04 1.04 0.88 5.18a Pipe line Irrigation No 43.00 0.12 5.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 1.20 7.00 0.84 8.00 0.96 11.00 1.32 6.00 0.72 42 5.04

Total [8.g] 43 5.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 1.20 7.00 0.84 8.00 0.96 11.00 1.32 6.00 0.72 42.00 5.048.h Agriculture based micro enterprise 19.42

0.39 3.88 4.08 3.88 3.88 3.30 19.42

a Provision of Agri services/business by federations/ institutions/SHGs etc (lumpsum) No 16.00 0.50 8.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.00 4.00 8.00 4.00 16 8.00

b Vermi composting 26.00 0.29 7.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 1.14 5.00 1.43 7.00 2.00 6.00 1.72 4.00 1.14 26 7.44c Electric Multipurpose thresher 20.50 0.10 4.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.60 6.00 1.20 5.00 1.00 3.50 0.70 3.00 0.60 21 4.10

Total [8.h] 16 19.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.00 1.74 11.00 2.63 12.00 3.00 17.50 6.42 15.00 5.74 62.50 19.548.i Livestock & Dairy based enterprise 0.30

0.01 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.30

a Integrated livestock and Dairy based enterprise No 17.00 0.33 5.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.33 2.00 0.65 4.00 1.30 5.00 1.63 5.00 1.63 17 5.53

b Chaff Cutter 22.00 0.08 2.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.40 4.00 0.40 4.00 0.40 6.00 0.60 4.00 0.40 22 2.20Total [8.i] 17 7.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.73 6.00 1.05 8.00 1.70 11.00 2.23 9.00 2.03 39.00 7.73

8.j Non farm micro enterprise 0.390.01 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.39

a Mobile repairing per candidate cost 32.00 0.09 2.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.00 0.82 19.00 1.72 4.00 0.36 32 2.90

b Domestic Electric and based appliances repair training

per candidate cost 30.00 0.09 2.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.09 16.00 1.45 13.00 1.18 30 2.72

c Flour Mill 7.00 0.30 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 1.20 3.00 0.90 7 2.10Total [8.j] 69 7.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.91 39.00 4.38 20.00 2.44 69.00 7.72

Sub-Total (8.a to 8.j) 129.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 322.00 16.48 447.50 26.29 485.00 31.04 532.50 33.22 404.00 22.44 2191.00 129.47

9 Consolidation phase 3 25.890.52 5.18 5.44 5.18 5.18 4.40 25.89

a Capacity Enhancement for post project management 0.00 8.29 25.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25.89 0 25.89

b Impact documentation 0.00 4.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00c Scalling up operation 0.00 4.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00d Monitoring and Evaluation 0.00 4.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00e Photography 0.00 4.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00

Sub-Total (9) 25.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25.89 0.00 25.89Grand Total 100 863.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 21.50 957.60 167.97 1239.50 191.15 1217.88 182.29 1216.50 159.86 761.12 140.15 5392.60 862.93




0 2 20 21 20 20 170 8.7303574 74.78860659 78.2807495 75.33425393 75.33425393 64.211779 376.68

1 Administrative costs 10 37.67 0.00 1.88 5.65 12.05 10.547 3.77 3.77 0 37.672 Monitoring 1 3.77 0.00 0.75 1.51 1.51 0 3.773 Evaluation 1 3.77 0.00 1.13 1.318 1.32 0 3.77

Sub-total (1+2+3) 45.20 0 0.00 0 1.88 0 7.53 0 13.56 0 11.87 0 6.59 0 3.77 0 45.204 Entry Point activity 4 15.07 3.91 11.16 0 15.07

Total [4] 15.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.91 0.00 11.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 15.075 Detailed project Report 1 3.77 3.77 0 3.77

Total [5] 3.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3.776 Institution and Capacity building 5 18.83

0.38 3.77 3.96 3.77 3.77 3.20 18.83a Awareness Programme No 31 0.08 2.48 0.00 0.00 8 0.64 8 0.64 11 0.88 4 0.32 0.00 31 2.48b Institutrional building No 20 0.20 4.00 0.00 0.00 5 1.00 5 1.00 5 1.00 5 1.00 0.00 20 4.00c Exposure visit [External] No 10 0.35 3.50 0.00 0.00 2 0.70 3 1.05 2 0.70 3 1.05 0.00 10 3.50d Exposure visit [local] No 10 0.15 1.50 0.00 0.00 3 0.45 2 0.30 3 0.45 2 0.30 0.00 10 1.50e Field training No 10 0.10 1.00 0.00 0.00 2 0.20 3 0.30 2 0.20 3 0.30 0.00 10 1.00f Padyatra/ Campaign No 2 0.75 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.75 0.00 1 0.75 0.00 2 1.50g Vaternary and Health Camp No 10 0.25 2.45 0.00 0.00 3 0.74 2 0.49 3 0.74 2 0.49 0.00 10 2.45h SHG Capacity building No 10 0.08 0.80 0.00 0.00 2 0.16 3 0.24 2 0.16 3 0.24 0.00 10 0.80i Sinages,wall painting, boards No 10 0.08 0.80 0.00 0.00 2 0.16 3 0.24 3 0.24 2 0.16 0.00 10 0.80j Audit (Physical,financial and social) No 10 0.08 0.80 0.00 0.00 3 0.24 2 0.16 2 0.16 3 0.24 0.00 10 0.80

Total [6] 123 18.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 4.29 32.00 5.17 33.00 4.53 28.00 4.85 0.00 0.00 123.00 18.83

Sub-Total (4+5+6) 37.66 0 0.00 0 7.68 30 15.45 32 5.17 33 4.53 28 4.85 0.00 0.00 123 37.67

7 Watershed development works 60 226.017.a Arable Land 84.44 1.69 16.89 17.73 16.89 16.89 14.35 84.44a Farm Bunding Ha 498 0.13 66.23 0.00 0.00 44 5.85 121 16.09 95 12.64 122 16.23 116 15.43 498 66.23b Farm Pond (Puccka) No 2 1.34 2.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 1.34 0.00 1 1.34 0.00 2 2.68c Farm Pond (Kaccha with poly bag) No 13 0.73 9.48 0.00 0.00 3 2.19 3 2.19 2 1.46 3 2.19 2 1.46 13 9.48d Regeneration No 302 0.02 6.04 0.00 0.00 76 1.52 75 1.50 76 1.52 52 1.04 23 0.46 302 6.04

Total (7.a) 84.44 0 0.00 0 0.00 123 9.56 200 21.12 173 15.61 178 20.80 141 17.35 815 84.44


2.32 23.19 24.35 23.19 23.19 19.71 115.95a P. D. on Private Land Ha 50 0.097 4.85 0.00 0.00 13 1.26 13 1.26 12 1.16 6 0.58 6 0.58 50 4.85b P.D. on Common Land Ha 200 0.43 85.20 0.00 0.00 50 21.30 50 21.30 50 21.30 25 10.65 25 10.65 200 85.20c Open contour Trench Ha 20 0.07 1.40 0.00 0.00 5 0.35 5 0.35 3 0.21 5 0.35 2 0.14 20 1.40d Earthen Dugout Pond No 8 0.62 4.99 0.00 0.00 2 1.25 2 1.25 1 0.62 2 1.25 1 0.62 8 4.99e New Nadi No 8 1.67 13.36 0.00 0.00 2 3.34 1 1.67 2 3.34 2 3.34 1 1.67 8 13.36f Repair of Nadi No 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00g Repair of Anicut No 1 6.14 6.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 4.34 0.00 1 1.80 2 6.14


0.51 5.13 5.38 5.13 5.13 4.36 25.63a LBCD No 100 0.056 5.60 0.00 0.00 25 1.40 25 1.40 25 1.40 25 1.40 0.00 100 5.60b Gabions No 2 0.492 0.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.49 1 0.49 0.00 0.00 2 0.98c R.R Stone Masonary Structure No 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00

d Earthen Nadi/Dam with connected waste weir No 5 3.809 19.05 0.00 0.00 1 3.81 1 3.81 1 3.81 1 3.81 1 3.81 5 19.05

Total (7.c) 0 25.63 0 0.00 0 0.00 26 5.21 27 5.70 27 5.70 26 5.21 1 3.81 107 25.63

Sub-total (7.a+7.b+7.c) 226.01 0 0.00 0 0.00 221 42.27 298 52.65 269 52.29 244 42.17 178.00 36.62 1210 226.01



0.05 0.45 0.47 0.45 0.45 0.38 2.25

a Skill Enhancement (Stiching/Tailoring/Kasidakari) 25 0.09 2.25 0.00 0.00 5 0.45 5 0.45 5 0.45 5 0.45 5 0.45 25 2.25

Total [8.a] 25 2.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.45 5.00 0.45 5.00 0.45 5.00 0.45 5.00 0.45 25.00 2.25

Total

WORK PLAN OF IWMP WATERSHED DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PANCHAYAT-GANDHER, TEH. -JAHAZPUR DISST.- BHILWARA

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16

8.b Livestock & Dairy management 11.300.23 2.26 2.37 2.26 2.26 1.92 11.30

a Cow/Buffalo Rearing No 12 0.325 3.90 0.00 0.00 3 0.98 3 0.98 2 0.65 2 0.65 2 0.65 12 3.90b Goat Rearing No 60 0.064 3.81 0.00 0.00 15 0.95 15 0.95 7 0.44 15 0.95 8 0.51 60 3.81c Fodder Innovatioin & management No 20 0.025 0.50 0.00 0.00 5 0.13 5 0.13 2 0.05 5 0.13 3 0.08 20 0.50d Breed Improvement [AI] No 300 0.00150 0.45 0.00 0.00 75 0.11 75 0.11 37 0.06 75 0.11 38 0.06 300 0.45

e Cattle services by Natural service in Buffalo (Bull) No 4 0.30 1.20 0.00 0.00 1 0.30 1 0.30 0.00 1 0.30 1 0.30 4 1.20

f Cattle services by Natural service in cow (Bull) No 4 0.25 1.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 4 1.00

g Cattle services by Natural service in Goat (Service Buck) No 4 0.11 0.44 0.00 0.00 1 0.11 1 0.11 1 0.11 1 0.11 0.00 4 0.44


0.10 1.02 1.07 1.02 1.02 0.86 5.09a Bio-gas No 18 0.21 3.69 0.00 0.00 4 0.82 5 1.03 4 0.82 3 0.62 2 0.41 18 3.69b Pressure cookers No 50 0.02 0.86 0.00 0.00 12 0.21 13 0.22 12 0.21 7 0.12 6 0.10 50 0.86c Energy efficient light No 30 0.02 0.54 0.00 0.00 8 0.14 7 0.13 9 0.16 3 0.05 3 0.05 30 0.54

Total [8.c] 98 5.09 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 24 1.17 25 1.38 25 1.19 13 0.79 11 0.57 98 5.09


0.11 1.12 1.18 1.12 1.12 0.95 5.60


70 0.08 5.60 0.00 0.00 14 1.12 14 1.12 14 1.12 14 1.12 14 1.12 70 5.60Total [8.d] 70 5.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.00 1.12 14.00 1.12 14.00 1.12 14.00 1.12 14.00 1.12 70.00 5.60

8.e Agriculture 10.830.22 2.17 2.27 2.17 2.17 1.84 10.83


Ha 36 0.04 1.31 0.00 0.00 9 0.33 9 0.33 10 0.36 8 0.29 0.00 36 1.31b Fodder Demo Ha 4 0.37 1.46 0.00 0.00 1 0.37 1 0.37 1 0.37 1 0.37 0.00 4 1.46c Grain / Seed Bank No 3 0.70 2.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.70 1 0.70 1 0.70 0.00 3 2.11d BD Composting No 27 0.01 0.38 0.00 0.00 7 0.10 7 0.10 7 0.10 6 0.09 0.00 27 0.38e Pit Composting No 32 0.01 0.32 0.00 0.00 6 0.06 7 0.07 7 0.07 7 0.07 5 0.05 32 0.32f Integrated Farm Model No 3 1.74 5.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 1.74 1 1.74 1 1.74 0.00 3 5.23


0.08 0.79 0.83 0.79 0.79 0.67 3.96a Horticulture Farm of Anar with drip No 5 0.64 3.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.64 2 1.28 1 0.64 1 0.64 5 3.20b Kitchen garden No 16 0.05 0.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 4 0.19 4 0.19 4 0.19 4 0.19 16 0.76


0.04 0.43 0.45 0.43 0.43 0.37 2.16a Pipe line Irrigation No 18 0.12 2.16 0.00 0.00 3 0.36 3 0.36 4 0.48 5 0.60 3 0.36 18 2.16


0.17 1.71 1.80 1.71 1.71 1.46 8.56

aProvision of Agri services/business by federations/ institutions/SHGs etc (lumpsum)

No 8 0.50 4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 1.50 5 2.50 8 4.00

b Vermi composting 10 0.29 2.86 0.00 0.00 2 0.57 2 0.57 1 0.29 2 0.57 3 0.86 10 2.86c Electric Multipurpose thresher 9 0.20 1.70 0.00 0.00 2 0.40 2 0.40 2 0.40 2 0.30 1 0.20 9 1.70


0.07 0.67 0.70 0.67 0.67 0.57 3.35

a Integrated livestock and Dairy based enterprise No 8 0.33 2.60 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 1 0.33 2 0.65 2 0.65 3 0.98 8 2.60

b Chaff Cutter 8 0.10 0.80 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.10 1 0.10 2 0.20 2 0.20 2 0.20 8 0.80Total [8.i] 16 3.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.10 2.00 0.43 4.00 0.85 4.00 0.85 5.00 1.18 16.00 3.40


a Mobile repairing per candidate cost 14 0.09 1.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10 0.91 4 0.36 14 1.27


per candidate cost 13 0.09 1.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8 0.73 5 0.45 13 1.18

c Flour Mill 3 0.30 0.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 0.60 1 0.30 3 0.90Total [8.j] 30 3.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 2.23 10.00 1.12 30.00 3.35

Sub-Total (8.a to 8.j) 56.50 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 175 7.85 185 11.67 137 10.90 196.50 15.01 120.00 11.07 814 56.50


a Capacity Enhancement for post project management

0 11.30 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 11.30 0 11.30b Impact documentation 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00c Scalling up operation 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00d Monitoring and Evaluation 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00e Photography 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00





2 20 21 20 20 170.00 5.37 46.03 48.18 46.37 46.37 39.52 231.84



Total [4] #REF! 9.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.92 0.00 6.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 9.275 Detailed project Report 1 2.32 1.8 0.52 0 2.32

Total [5] #REF! 2.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.80 0.00 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2.326 Institution and Capacity building 5 11.59

0.23 2.32 2.43 2.32 2.32 1.97 11.59a Awareness Programme No 12 0.08 0.96 0.00 0.00 3 0.24 3 0.24 3 0.24 3 0.24 0.00 12 0.96b Institutrional building No 8 0.20 1.60 0.00 0.00 2 0.40 2 0.40 2 0.40 2 0.40 0.00 8 1.60c Exposure visit [External] No 6 0.35 2.10 0.00 0.00 1 0.35 1 0.35 2 0.70 2 0.70 0.00 6 2.10d Exposure visit [local] No 5 0.15 0.75 0.00 0.00 1 0.15 2 0.30 1 0.15 1 0.15 0.00 5 0.75e Field training No 8 0.10 0.80 0.00 0.00 2 0.20 2 0.20 2 0.20 2 0.20 0.00 8 0.80f Padyatra/ Campaign No 2 0.75 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.75 0.00 1 0.75 0.00 2 1.50g Vaternary and Health Camp No 8 0.25 1.96 0.00 0.00 2 0.49 2 0.49 2 0.49 2 0.49 0.00 8 1.96h SHG Capacity building No 8 0.08 0.64 0.00 0.00 2 0.16 2 0.16 2 0.16 2 0.16 0.00 8 0.64i Sinages,wall painting, boards No 8 0.08 0.64 0.00 0.00 2 0.16 2 0.16 2 0.16 2 0.16 0.00 8 0.64j Audit (Physical,financial and social) No 8 0.08 0.64 0.00 0.00 2 0.16 2 0.16 2 0.16 2 0.16 0.00 8 0.64

Total [6] 73 11.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.00 2.31 19.00 3.21 18.00 2.66 19.00 3.41 0.00 0.00 73.00 11.59

Sub-Total (4+5+6) 23.18 0 0.00 0 4.72 17 9.18 19 3.21 18 2.66 19 3.41 0.00 0.00 73 23.18

7 Watershed development works 60 139.107.a Arable Land 43.82 0.88 8.76 9.20 8.76 8.76 7.45 43.82a Farm Bunding Ha 283 0.13 37.57 0.00 0.00 30.00 3.99 71.00 9.44 62.38 8.30 70.00 9.31 49 6.53 283 37.57b Farm Pond (Puccka) No 2 1.34 2.68 0.00 0.00 1 1.34 0.00 1 1.34 0.00 0.00 2 2.68c Farm Pond (Kaccha with poly bag) No 2 0.73 1.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.73 0.00 1 0.73 0.00 2 1.46d Regeneration No 174 0.02 3.48 0.00 0.00 42 0.84 44 0.88 43 0.86 21 0.42 24 0.48 174 3.48

Total (7.a) 45.19 0 0.00 0 0.00 73 6.17 116 11.05 106 10.50 92 10.46 73 7.01 461 45.19


1.15 11.55 12.12 11.55 11.55 9.81 57.73a P. D. on Private Land Ha 99.5 0.097 9.65 0.00 0.00 12 1.12 22 2.13 22 2.13 22 2.13 22 2.13 99.5 9.65b P.D. on Common Land Ha 80 0.43 34.08 0.00 0.00 20 8.52 20 8.52 20 8.52 20 8.52 0.00 80 34.08c Open contour Trench Ha 40 0.07 2.80 0.00 0.00 20 1.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 20 1.40 40 2.80d Earthen Dugout Pond No 5 0.62 3.12 0.00 0.00 1 0.62 1 0.62 2 1.25 1 0.62 0.00 5 3.12e New Nadi No 3 1.67 5.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 1.67 1 1.67 1 1.67 0.00 3 5.01f Repair of Nadi No 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00g Repair of Anicut No 1 3.07 3.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 3.07 0.00 0.00 1 3.07


0.85 8.54 8.97 8.54 8.54 7.26 42.70a LBCD No 117 0.056 6.55 0.00 0.00 29 1.62 29 1.62 29 1.62 30 1.68 0.00 117 6.55b Gabions No 5 0.492 2.46 0.00 0.00 1 0.49 2 0.98 1 0.49 1 0.49 0.00 5 2.46c R.R Stone Masonary Structure No 3 11.93 11.93 0.00 0.00 1 3.50 1 3.58 0.00 0.00 1 4.85 3 11.93

d Earthen Nadi/Dam with connected waste weir No 4 3.809 15.24 0.00 0.00 1 3.81 1 3.81 0.00 1 3.81 1 3.81 4 15.24

Total (7.c) 0 36.18 0 0.00 0 0.00 32 9.43 33 10.00 30 2.12 32 5.98 2 8.66 129 36.18

Sub-total (7.a+7.b+7.c) 139.10 0 0.00 0 0.00 158 27.26 193 34.00 182 29.25 168 29.39 117.12 19.21 818 139.10

8Production Enhancement & Livelihood activities for the asset less persons

15 34.78


0.03 0.27 0.28 0.27 0.27 0.23 1.35

a Skill Enhancement (Stiching/Tailoring/Kasidakari) 15 0.09 1.35 0.00 0.00 2 0.18 4 0.36 4 0.36 3 0.27 2 0.18 15 1.35

Total

WORK PLAN OF IWMP WATERSHED DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PANCHAYAT-TITORI, TEH. -JAHAZPUR DISST.- BHILWARA

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16


0.14 1.42 1.49 1.42 1.42 1.21 7.11a Cow/Buffalo Rearing No 8 0.325 2.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.33 4 1.30 0 0.00 3 0.98 8 2.60b Goat Rearing No 43 0.064 2.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 11 0.70 11 0.70 10 0.64 11 0.70 43 2.73c Fodder Innovatioin & management No 19 0.025 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 10 0.25 5 0.13 4 0.10 0 0.00 19 0.48d Breed Improvement [AI] No 283 0.00150 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 30 0.05 71 0.11 70 0.11 112 0.17 283 0.42

e Cattle services by Natural service in Buffalo (Bull) No 1 0.30 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.30 1 0.30

f Cattle services by Natural service in cow (Bull) No 1 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.25 0.00 0.00 1 0.25

g Cattle services by Natural service in Goat (Service Buck) No 3 0.11 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.11 1 0.11 1 0.11 3 0.33


0.06 0.63 0.66 0.63 0.63 0.53 3.13a Bio-gas No 10 0.21 2.05 0.00 0.00 2 0.41 2 0.41 2 0.41 3 0.62 1 0.21 10 2.05b Pressure cookers No 30 0.02 0.52 0.00 0.00 8 0.14 0 0.00 8 0.14 7 0.12 7 0.12 30 0.52c Energy efficient light No 31 0.02 0.56 0.00 0.00 8 0.14 0 0.00 8 0.14 7 0.13 8 0.14 31 0.56

Total [8.c] 71 3.13 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 18 0.69 2 0.41 18 0.69 17 0.86 16 0.47 71 3.13


0.07 0.69 0.72 0.69 0.69 0.58 3.44


43 0.08 3.44 0.00 0.00 7 0.56 9 0.72 9 0.72 9 0.72 9 0.72 43 3.44Total [8.d] 43 3.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.00 0.56 9.00 0.72 9.00 0.72 9.00 0.72 9.00 0.72 43.00 3.44

8.e Agriculture 6.670.13 1.33 1.40 1.33 1.33 1.13 6.67


Ha 56 0.04 2.04 0.00 0.00 14 0.51 14 0.51 14 0.51 14 0.51 0.00 56 2.04b Fodder Demo Ha 5 0.37 1.83 0.00 0.00 1 0.37 2 0.73 1 0.37 1 0.37 0.00 5 1.83c Grain / Seed Bank No 1 0.70 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.70d BD Composting No 17 0.01 0.24 0.00 0.00 4 0.06 3 0.04 5 0.07 4 0.06 1 0.01 17 0.24e Pit Composting No 11 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 5 0.05 4 0.04 2 0.02 11 0.11f Integrated Farm Model No 1 1.74 1.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 1.74 0.00 0.00 1 1.74


0.05 0.48 0.50 0.48 0.48 0.41 2.39a Horticulture Farm of Anar with drip No 3 0.64 1.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.64 1 0.64 1 0.64 0.00 3 1.92b Kitchen garden No 10 0.05 0.47 0.00 0.00 2 0.09 1 0.05 2 0.09 2 0.09 3 0.14 10 0.47


0.03 0.29 0.30 0.29 0.29 0.24 1.44a Pipe line Irrigation No 12 0.12 1.44 0.00 0.00 3 0.36 0.00 3 0.36 3 0.36 2 0.24 11 1.32


0.10 1.04 1.09 1.04 1.04 0.88 5.20

aProvision of Agri services/business by federations/ institutions/SHGs etc No 4 0.50 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 1.00 2 1.00 4 2.00

b Vermi composting 7 0.29 2.00 0.00 0.00 2 0.57 1 0.29 2 0.57 1 0.29 1 0.29 7 2.00c Electric Multipurpose thresher 6 0.20 1.20 0.00 0.00 1 0.20 1 0.20 1 0.20 1 0.20 2 0.40 6 1.20


0.04 0.40 0.42 0.40 0.40 0.34 2.00

a Integrated livestock and Dairy based enterprise No 5 0.33 1.63 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.33 0.00 1 0.33 1 0.33 2 0.65 5 1.63

b Chaff Cutter 5 0.10 0.50 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.10 1 0.10 1 0.10 1 0.10 1 0.10 5 0.50Total [8.i] 5 2.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.43 1.00 0.10 2.00 0.43 2.00 0.43 3.00 0.75 10.00 2.13


a Mobile repairing per candidate cost 8 0.09 0.73 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8 0.73 0.00 8 0.73


per candidate cost 8 0.09 0.73 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 8 0.73 8 0.73

c Flour Mill 2 0.30 0.60 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 1 0.30 1 0.30 2 0.60Total [8.j] 18 2.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.00 1.03 9.00 1.03 18.00 2.05

Sub-Total (8.a to 8.j) 34.91 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 56 4.02 92 6.07 161 9.40 158.00 7.81 180.00 7.50 647 34.79


a Capacity Enhancement for post project management 0 6.96 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 6.96 0 6.96

b Impact documentation 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00c Scalling up operation 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00d Monitoring and Evaluation 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00e Photography 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00



Sl.No. Budget component % of the Budget

Units No/Ha Quantity Rate

in RsBudget in


0 2 20 21 20 20 170 4.166319 35.6907718 37.3572994 35.95116674 35.95116674 30.643276 179.76



Total [4] 7.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.63 0.00 4.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7.195 Detailed project Report 1 1.80 0.64 0.78 0.38 0 1.80


0.18 1.80 1.89 1.80 1.80 1.53 8.99a Awareness Programme No 10 0.08 0.81 0.00 0.00 2 0.17 3 0.24 3 0.24 2 0.16 0.00 10 0.81b Institutrional building No 8 0.20 1.60 0.00 0.00 2 0.40 1 0.20 2 0.40 3 0.60 0.00 8 1.60c Exposure visit [External] No 4 0.35 1.40 0.00 0.00 1 0.35 1 0.35 1 0.35 1 0.35 0.00 4 1.40d Exposure visit [local] No 6 0.15 0.90 0.00 0.00 1 0.15 1 0.15 2 0.30 2 0.30 0.00 6 0.90e Field training No 7 0.10 0.70 0.00 0.00 3 0.30 1 0.10 2 0.20 1 0.10 0.00 7 0.70f Padyatra/ Campaign No 1 0.75 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.75 0.00 0.00 1 0.75g Vaternary and Health Camp No 6 0.25 1.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 0.49 2 0.49 2 0.49 0.00 6 1.47h SHG Capacity building No 5 0.08 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 0.16 2 0.16 1 0.08 0.00 5 0.40i Sinages,wall painting, boards No 8 0.08 0.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 0.16 3 0.24 3 0.24 0.00 8 0.64j Audit (Physical,financial and social) No 4 0.08 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 0.16 1 0.08 1 0.08 0.00 4 0.32

Total [6] 59 8.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.00 1.37 15.00 2.01 19.00 3.21 16.00 2.40 0.00 0.00 59.00 8.99

Sub-Total (4+5+6) 17.98 0 0.00 0 3.27 9 6.71 15 2.39 19 3.21 16 2.40 0.00 0.00 59 17.98

7 Watershed development works 60 107.867.a Arable Land 38.34 0.77 7.67 8.05 7.67 7.67 6.52 38.34a Farm Bunding Ha 214 0.13 28.46 0.00 0.00 30 3.99 50 6.65 50 6.65 34 4.52 50 6.65 214 28.46b Farm Pond (Puccka) No 2 1.34 2.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 1.34 1 1.34 0 0.00 0 0.00 2 2.68c Farm Pond (Kaccha with poly bag) No 5 0.73 3.65 0.00 0.00 1 0.73 1 0.73 2 1.46 1 0.73 0 0.00 5 3.65d Regeneration No 202 0.02 4.05 0.00 0.00 51 1.02 50 1.00 51 1.02 50 1.01 0 0.00 202 4.05

Total (7.a) 38.84 0 0.00 0 0.00 82 5.74 102 9.72 104 10.47 85 6.26 50 6.65 423 38.84


0.72 7.18 7.54 7.18 7.18 6.10 35.90a P. D. on Private Land Ha 15 0.097 1.46 0.00 0.00 3 0.29 3 0.29 3 0.29 3 0.29 3 0.29 15 1.46b P.D. on Common Land Ha 40 0.43 17.04 0.00 0.00 20 8.52 5 2.13 5 2.13 5 2.13 5 2.13 40 17.04c Open contour Trench Ha 40 0.07 2.80 0.00 0.00 10 0.70 10 0.70 10 0.70 10 0.70 0.00 40 2.80d Earthen Dugout Pond No 5 0.62 3.12 0.00 0.00 1 0.62 2 1.25 1 0.62 1 0.62 0.00 5 3.12e New Nadi No 5 1.67 8.35 0.00 0.00 1 1.67 1 1.67 1 1.67 2 3.34 0.00 5 8.35f Repair of Nadi No 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00g Repair of Anicut No 1 3.13 3.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 3.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 3.13


0.66 6.63 6.96 6.63 6.63 5.63 33.13a LBCD No 41 0.056 2.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 21 1.18 0.00 20 1.12 0.00 41 2.30b Gabions No 10 0.492 4.92 0.00 0.00 2 0.98 3 1.48 3 1.48 2 0.98 0.00 10 4.92c R.R Stone Masonary Structure No 2 10.674 10.674 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 10.67 2 10.67

d Earthen Nadi/Dam with connected waste weir No 4 3.809 15.24 0.00 0.00 1 3.81 1 3.81 1 3.81 1 3.81 0.00 4 15.24

Total (7.c) 0 33.13 0 0.00 0 0.00 3 4.79 25 6.46 4 5.29 23 5.91 2 10.67 57 33.12

Sub-total (7.a+7.b+7.c) 107.86 0 0.00 0 0.00 120 22.34 149 25.35 128 21.17 129 19.26 60.00 19.74 586 107.86


15 26.96


0.02 0.23 0.25 0.23 0.23 0.20 1.17

2015-16

WORK PLAN OF IWMP WATERSHED DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PANCHAYAT-BAORI, TEH. -JAHAZPUR DISST.- BHILWARA

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Total

a Skill Enhancement (Stiching/Tailoring/Kasidakari) 13 0.09 1.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 0.54 0.00 0.00 7 0.63 13 1.17


0.11 1.08 1.13 1.08 1.08 0.92 5.39a Cow/Buffalo Rearing No 8 0.325 2.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 0.65 2 0.65 2 0.65 2 0.65 8 2.60b Goat Rearing No 20 0.064 1.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 5 0.32 5 0.32 5 0.32 5 0.32 20 1.27c Fodder Innovatioin & management No 12 0.025 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 0.08 3 0.08 3 0.08 3 0.08 12 0.30d Breed Improvement [AI] No 209 #### 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 53 0.08 52 0.08 52 0.08 52 0.08 209 0.31

e Cattle services by Natural service in Buffalo (Bull) No 1 0.30 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.30 0.00 0.00 1 0.30

f Cattle services by Natural service in cow (Bull) No 2 0.25 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.25 0.00 1 0.25 0.00 2 0.50

g Cattle services by Natural service in Goat (Service Buck) No 1 0.11 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.11 0.00 1 0.11


0.05 0.48 0.51 0.48 0.48 0.41 2.42a Bio-gas No 9 0.21 1.85 0.00 0.00 2 0.41 3 0.62 2 0.41 2 0.41 0.00 9 1.85b Pressure cookers No 24 0.02 0.41 0.00 0.00 3 0.05 6 0.10 6 0.10 6 0.10 3 0.05 24 0.41c Energy efficient light No 9 0.02 0.16 0.00 0.00 1 0.02 2 0.04 3 0.05 2 0.04 1 0.02 9 0.16

Total [8.c] 42 2.42 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 6 0.48 11 0.75 11 0.57 10 0.55 4 0.07 42 2.42


0.05 0.53 0.55 0.53 0.53 0.45 2.64


33 0.08 2.64 0.00 0.00 6 0.48 7 0.56 7 0.56 7 0.56 6 0.48 33 2.64Total [8.d] 33 2.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.48 7.00 0.56 7.00 0.56 7.00 0.56 6.00 0.48 33.00 2.64

8.e Agriculture 4.990.10 1.00 1.05 1.00 1.00 0.85 4.99


Ha 55 0.04 2.00 0.00 0.00 14 0.51 14 0.51 14 0.51 13 0.47 0.00 55 2.00b Fodder Demo Ha 1 0.37 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.37 0.00 0.00 1 0.37c Grain / Seed Bank No 1 0.70 0.70 0.00 0.00 1 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.70d BD Composting No 8 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 2 0.03 0.00 4 0.06 2 0.03 0.00 8 0.11e Pit Composting No 6 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.00 1 0.01 0 0.00 5 0.05 0.00 0.00 6 0.06f Integrated Farm Model No 1 1.74 1.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 1.74 0.00 0.00 1 1.74


0.04 0.40 0.42 0.40 0.40 0.34 1.99a Horticulture Farm of Anar with drip No 2 0.64 1.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.64 1 0.64 0.00 2 1.28b Kitchen garden No 15 0.05 0.71 0.00 0.00 5 0.24 2 0.09 4 0.19 4 0.19 0.00 15 0.71


0.02 0.22 0.23 0.22 0.22 0.18 1.08a Pipe line Irrigation No 9 0.12 1.08 0.00 0.00 2 0.24 3 0.36 1 0.12 3 0.36 0.00 9 1.08


0.08 0.80 0.84 0.80 0.80 0.68 4.00

aProvision of Agri services/business by federations/ institutions/SHGs etc No 2 0.50 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.50 1 0.50 2 1.00

b Vermi composting 7 0.29 2.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 2 0.57 2 0.57 3 0.86 0.00 7 2.00c Electric Multipurpose thresher 5 0.20 1.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 2 0.40 2 0.40 1 0.20 0.00 5 1.00


0.03 0.34 0.36 0.34 0.34 0.29 1.70

a Integrated livestock and Dairy based enterprise No 4 0.33 1.30 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 1 0.33 1 0.33 2 0.65 0.00 4 1.30

b Chaff Cutter 4 0.10 0.40 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 1 0.10 1 0.10 1 0.10 1 0.10 4 0.40Total [8.i] 4 1.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.43 2.00 0.43 3.00 0.75 1.00 0.10 8.00 1.70


a Mobile repairing per

candidate cost

7 0.09 0.63 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 7 0.63 0.00 0.00 7 0.63


per candidate

cost

7 0.09 0.63 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 7 0.63 0.00 7 0.63

c Flour Mill 1 0.30 0.30 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 1 0.30 0.00 1 0.30Total [8.j] 15 1.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.00 0.63 8.00 0.94 0.00 0.00 15.00 1.57

Sub-Total (8.a to 8.j) 26.96 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 37 2.69 113 5.59 125 8.26 120.00 7.52 81.00 2.90 476 26.96








0 2 20 21 20 20 170 0.9122514 7.814801836 8.179702406 7.87181755 7.87181755 6.7096092 39.36




Total [5] 0 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.396 Institution and Capacity building 5 1.97

0.04 0.39 0.41 0.39 0.39 0.33 1.97a Awareness Programme No 1 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.08b Institutrional building No 2 0.20 0.40 0.00 0.00 1 0.20 1 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 0.40c Exposure visit [External] No 1 0.35 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.35 0.00 1 0.35d Exposure visit [local] No 3 0.15 0.45 0.00 0.00 1 0.15 0.00 1 0.15 1 0.15 0.00 3 0.45e Field training No 2 0.10 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.10 1 0.10 0.00 2 0.20f Padyatra/ Campaign No 0 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00g Vaternary and Health Camp No 1 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.25h SHG Capacity building No 1 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.08 0.00 0.00 1 0.08i Sinages,wall painting, boards No 1 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.08 0.00 1 0.08j Audit (Physical,financial and social) No 1 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.00 1 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.08

Total [6] 13 1.97 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.43 3.00 0.53 3.00 0.33 4.00 0.68 0.00 0.00 13.00 1.97

Sub-Total (4+5+6) 3.93 0 0.00 0 0.80 3 1.59 3 0.53 3 0.33 4 0.68 0.00 0.00 13 3.93

7 Watershed development works 60 23.627.a Arable Land 7.18 0.14 1.44 1.51 1.44 1.44 1.22 7.18a Farm Bunding Ha 31 0.13 4.12 0.00 0.00 8 1.06 8 1.06 8 1.06 7 0.93 0.00 31 4.12b Farm Pond (Puccka) No 1.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00c Farm Pond (Kaccha with poly bag) No 2 0.73 1.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.73 1 0.73 0.00 0.00 2 1.46d Regeneration No 80 0.02 1.60 0.00 0.00 20 0.40 20 0.40 20 0.40 20 0.40 0.00 80 1.60

Total (7.a) 7.18 0 0.00 0 0.00 28 1.46 29 2.19 29 2.19 27 1.33 0 0.00 113 7.18


0.20 1.97 2.06 1.97 1.97 1.67 9.83a P. D. on Private Land Ha 10.1 0.097 0.98 0.00 0.00 1 0.11 3 0.29 2 0.29 3 0.29 0.00 9 0.98b P.D. on Common Land Ha 10 0.43 4.26 0.00 0.00 3 1.28 2 0.85 3 1.28 2 0.85 0.00 10 4.26c Open contour Trench Ha 0 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00d Earthen Dugout Pond No 2 0.62 1.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.62 1 0.62 0.00 0.00 2 1.25e New Nadi No 2 1.67 3.34 0.00 0.00 1 1.67 0.00 0.00 1 1.67 0.00 2 3.34f Repair of Nadi No 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00g Repair of Anicut No 0 8.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00


0.13 1.32 1.39 1.32 1.32 1.12 6.61a LBCD No 50 0.056 2.80 0.00 0.00 10 0.56 13 0.73 14 0.78 13 0.73 0.00 50 2.80b Gabions No 0.492 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00c R.R Stone Masonary Structure No 10.674 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00

d Earthen Nadi/Dam with connected waste weir No 1 3.809 3.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 1 3.81 1 3.81

Total (7.c) 0 6.61 0 0.00 0 0.00 10 0.56 13 0.73 14 0.78 13 0.73 1 3.81 51 6.61

Sub-total (7.a+7.b+7.c) 23.62 0 0.00 0 0.00 43 5.08 48 4.69 49 5.17 46 4.87 1.00 3.81 187 23.62


15 5.90


0.00 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.18

a Skill Enhancement (Stiching/Tailoring/Kasidakari) 2 0.09 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.09 1 0.09 0.00 2 0.18

Total [8.a] 2 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.09 1.00 0.09 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.18

Total

WORK PLAN OF IWMP WATERSHED DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PANCHAYAT-PANDER, TEH. -JAHAZPUR DISST.- BHILWARA

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16


a Cow/Buffalo Rearing No 1 0.325 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.33b Goat Rearing No 2 0.064 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.06 1 0.06 0.00 0.00 2 0.13c Fodder Innovatioin & management No 2 0.025 0.05 0.00 0.00 1 0.03 0.00 1 0.03 0.00 0.00 2 0.05d Breed Improvement [AI] No 15 0.00150 0.02 0.00 0.00 3 0.00450 3 0.00450 3 0.00450 3 0.00450 3 0.0045 15 0.02

e Cattle services by Natural service in Buffalo (Bull) No 1 0.30 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.30

f Cattle services by Natural service in cow (Bull) No 1 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.25 0.00 1 0.25

g Cattle services by Natural service in Goat (Service Buck) No 1 0.11 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.11 0.00 0.00 1 0.11


0.01 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.09 0.53a Bio-gas No 2 0.21 0.41 0.00 0.00 1 0.21 0.00 0.00 1 0.21 0.00 2 0.41b Pressure cookers No 5 0.02 0.09 0.00 0.00 1 0.02 1 0.02 1 0.02 1 0.02 1 0.02 5 0.09c Energy efficient light No 2 0.02 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.02 0.00 1 0.02 0.00 2 0.04

Total [8.c] 9 0.53 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 2 0.22 2 0.04 1 0.02 3 0.24 1 0.02 9 0.53


0.01 0.11 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.10 0.56


7 0.08 0.56 0.00 0.00 1 0.08 3 0.24 2 0.16 0 0.00 1 0.08 7 0.56Total [8.d] 7 0.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.08 3.00 0.24 2.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.08 7.00 0.56

8.e Agriculture 1.190.02 0.24 0.25 0.24 0.24 0.20 1.19


Ha 18 0.04 0.66 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 9 0.33 2 0.07 4 0.15 3 0.11 18 0.66b Fodder Demo Ha 1 0.37 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.37 0.00 0.00 1 0.37c Grain / Seed Bank No 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00d BD Composting No 5 0.01 0.07 0.00 0.00 1 0.01 1 0.01 1 0.01 1 0.01 1 0.01 5 0.07e Pit Composting No 12 0.01 0.12 0.00 0.00 2 0.02 1 0.01 3 0.03 2 0.02 4 0.04 12 0.12f Integrated Farm Model No 0 1.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00


0.01 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.43a Horticulture Farm of Anar with drip No 0.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00b Kitchen garden No 9 0.05 0.43 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 3 0.14 3 0.14 3 0.14 0.00 9 0.43


0.00 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.24a Pipe line Irrigation No 2 0.12 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.12 0.00 0.00 1 0.12 2 0.24


0.02 0.18 0.19 0.18 0.18 0.15 0.89

aProvision of Agri services/business by federations/ institutions/SHGs No 1 0.50 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.50 0.00 1 0.50

b Vermi composting 1 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.29 0.00 0.00 1 0.29c Electric Multipurpose thresher 1 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.20


0.01 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.30

a Integrated livestock and Dairy based enterprise No 0 0.33 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00

b Chaff Cutter 2 0.10 0.20 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 1 0.10 0.00 1 0.10 0.00 2 0.20Total [8.i] 0 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.20


a Mobile repairing per candidate cost 1 0.09 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.09 0.00 0.00 1 0.09


per candidate cost 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00

c Flour Mill 1 0.30 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.30 1 0.30Total [8.j] 2 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.09 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.30 2.00 0.39

Sub-Total (8.a to 8.j) 5.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.37 28.00 1.88 22.00 1.47 20.00 1.51 15.00 0.69 95.00 5.91




0 2 20 21 20 20 170 0.8176888 7.004730914 7.331806425 7.055836462 7.055836462 6.014101 35.28





0.04 0.35 0.37 0.35 0.35 0.30 1.76a Awareness Programme No 4 0.08 0.32 0.00 0.00 1 0.08 1 0.08 1 0.08 1 0.08 0.00 4 0.32b Institutrional building No 1 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.20 0.00 1 0.20c Exposure visit [External] No 1 0.35 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.35d Exposure visit [local] No 2 0.15 0.30 0.00 0.00 1 0.15 0.00 1 0.15 0.00 0.00 2 0.30e Field training No 1 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.10 0.00 1 0.10f Padyatra/ Campaign No 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00g Vaternary and Health Camp No 1 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.25h SHG Capacity building No 1 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.08 0.00 0.00 1 0.08i Sinages,wall painting, boards No 1 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.08j Audit (Physical,financial and social) No 1 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.08 0.00 1 0.08

Total [6] 13 1.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.23 4.00 0.76 3.00 0.31 4.00 0.46 0.00 0.00 13.00 1.76

Sub-Total (4+5+6) 3.52 0 0.00 0 0.72 2 1.27 4 0.76 3 0.31 4 0.46 0.00 0.00 13 3.52

7 Watershed development works 60 21.177.a Arable Land 5.94 0.12 1.19 1.25 1.19 1.19 1.01 5.94a Farm Bunding Ha 20 0.13 2.66 0.00 0.00 10 1.33 5 0.67 0.00 5 0.67 0.00 20 2.66b Farm Pond (Puccka) No 1 1.34 1.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 1.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 1.34c Farm Pond (Kaccha with poly bag) No 2 0.73 1.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.73 0.00 1 0.73 0.00 2 1.46d Regeneration No 24 0.02 0.48 0.00 0.00 6 0.12 6 0.12 6 0.12 6 0.12 0.00 24 0.48

Total (7.a) 5.94 0 0.00 0 0.00 16 1.45 13 2.86 6 0.12 12 1.51 0 0.00 47 5.94


0.18 1.76 1.84 1.76 1.76 1.49 8.78a P. D. on Private Land Ha 10 0.097 0.97 0.00 0.00 5 0.49 3 0.29 0.00 2 0.19 0.00 10 0.97b P.D. on Common Land Ha 10 0.43 4.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10 4.26 0.00 0.00 10 4.26c Open contour Trench Ha 18 0.07 1.26 0.00 0.00 4 0.28 5 0.35 5 0.35 4 0.28 0.00 18 1.26d Earthen Dugout Pond No 1 0.62 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.62e New Nadi No 1 1.67 1.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 1.67 0.00 1 1.67f Repair of Nadi No 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00g Repair of Anicut No 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00


0.13 1.29 1.35 1.29 1.29 1.10 6.45a LBCD No 29.5 0.056 1.65 0.00 0.00 7 0.39 8 0.45 8 0.42 7 0.39 0.00 30 1.65b Gabions No 2 0.492 0.98 0.00 0.00 1 0.49 1 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 0.98c R.R Stone Masonary Structure No 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00

d Earthen Nadi/Dam with connected waste weir No 1 3.809 3.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 3.81 1 3.81

Total (7.c) 0 6.45 0 0.00 0 0.00 8 0.88 9 0.94 8 0.42 7 0.39 1 3.81 33 6.45

Sub-total (7.a+7.b+7.c) 21.17 0 0.00 0 0.00 33 3.10 31 5.06 29 5.15 26 4.05 1.00 3.81 120 21.17



0.00 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.18

a Skill Enhancement (Stiching/Tailoring/Kasidakari) 2 0.09 0.18 0.00 0.00 1 0.09 0.00 0.00 1 0.09 0.00 2 0.18

Total [8.a] 2 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.09 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.18

Total

WORK PLAN OF IWMP WATERSHED DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PANCHAYAT-PHALASIYA, TEH. -JAHAZPUR DISST.- BHILWARA

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16


a Cow/Buffalo Rearing No 1 0.325 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.33b Goat Rearing No 0 0.064 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00c Fodder Innovatioin & management No 3 0.025 0.08 0.00 0.00 1 0.03 0.00 1 0.03 1 0.03 0.00 3 0.08d Breed Improvement [AI] No 80 0.00150 0.12 0.00 0.00 20 0.03 20 0.03 20 0.03 20 0.03 0.00 80 0.12

e Cattle services by Natural service in Buffalo (Bull) No 1 0.30 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.30

f Cattle services by Natural service in cow (Bull) No 1 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.25

g Cattle services by Natural service in Goat (Service Buck) No 0 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00


0.01 0.09 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.47a Bio-gas No 1 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.00 1 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.21b Pressure cookers No 8 0.02 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 0.03 2 0.03 2 0.03 2 0.03 8 0.13c Energy efficient light No 8 0.02 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 0.04 2 0.04 2 0.04 2 0.04 8 0.14

Total [8.c] 17 0.48 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.21 4 0.06 4 0.07 4 0.07 4 0.07 17 0.48


0.01 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.08 0.48


6 0.08 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 0.16 2 0.16 2 0.16 6 0.48Total [8.d] 6 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.16 2.00 0.16 2.00 0.16 6.00 0.48

8.e Agriculture 1.070.02 0.21 0.22 0.21 0.21 0.18 1.07


Ha 15 0.04 0.55 0.00 0.00 9 0.33 0.00 3 0.11 3 0.11 0.00 15 0.55b Fodder Demo Ha 1 0.37 0.37 0.00 0.00 1 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.37c Grain / Seed Bank No 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00d BD Composting No 4 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.01 1 0.01 1 0.01 1 0.01 4 0.06e Pit Composting No 11 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 7 0.07 0.00 4 0.04 0.00 0.00 11 0.11f Integrated Farm Model No 1.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00


0.01 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.33a Horticulture Farm of Anar with drip No 0.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00b Kitchen garden No 7 0.05 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 0.09 2 0.09 2 0.09 1 0.05 7 0.33


0.00 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.24a Pipe line Irrigation No 2 0.12 0.24 0.00 0.00 2 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 0.24


0.02 0.16 0.17 0.16 0.16 0.13 0.79

aProvision of Agri services/business by federations/ institutions/SHGs etc No 1 0.50 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.50 0.00 1 0.50

b Vermi composting 1 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.29 0.00 0.00 1 0.29c Electric Multipurpose thresher 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00


0.01 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.30

a Integrated livestock and Dairy based enterprise No 0.33 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00

b Chaff Cutter 3 0.10 0.30 0.00 0 0.00 2 0.20 0.00 0.00 1 0.10 0.00 3 0.30Total [8.i] 0 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.30


a Mobile repairing per candidate cost 2 0.09 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.09 1 0.09 0.00 2 0.18


per candidate cost 2 0.09 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.09 1 0.09 0.00 2 0.18

c Flour Mill 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00Total [8.j] 4 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.18 2.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.36

Sub-Total (8.a to 8.j) 5.31 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 44 1.55 30 1.08 40 1.01 38.00 1.38 8.00 0.29 160 5.31

S. No ActivityNo of trainee/ Units

Rates Total Amt (Rs) References Remark

1 Food and Logistics 50 50.00 2500.00 Cir.No. 1147-1200 Dt 12.07.04 Dir WDSC Jaipur item No. 1 Per trainee/day

2 Honorium of Resource persons 4 150.00 600.00 Cir.No. 1147-1200 Dt 12.07.04

Dir WDSC Jaipur item No. 8 4 lecture/ day

3 Literature and stationery 50 50.00 2500.00 Cir.No. 1147-1200 Dt 12.07.04 Dir WDSC Jaipur item No. 11

Folder, Pen, dairy and study material

4 Venue charges, Tantages ets 1 800.00 800.00 Cir.No. 1147-1200 Dt 12.07.04 Dir WDSC Jaipur item No. 10 Hall fair and mat

5 Photography & videography 1 500.00 500.00 Either soft/ hard copy

6 Miscellaneous charges 1 1100.00 1100.00 Cir.No. 1147-1200 Dt 12.07.04 Dir WDSC Jaipur item No. 12

TOTAL 8000.00

Foundation For Ecological SecurityA-160,Subhash Nagar,Bhilwara,Rajasthan 311001

Integrated Watershed Management Programme, JahazpurDetailed Estimate of physical, financial and social audit

S. No ActivityNo of trainee/ Units










TOTAL 8000.00

Detailed Estimate of Awareness Program


Integrated Watershed Management Programme, Jahazpur

S. No ActivityNo of

trainee/ Units


1 Food and Logistics 100 50.00 5000.00 Cir.No. 1147-1200 Dt 12.07.04 Dir WDSC Jaipur item No. 1 per trainee/day

2 Transportation charges 1 2000.00 2000.00 Jeep hired as per actual bill/day

3 Prabhat pheri through vehicles 2 1000.00 2000.00


Folder, Pen, dairy and study

material

5 Venue charges, Tantages ets 1 1500.00 1500.00 Cir.No. 1147-1200 Dt 12.07.04 Dir WDSC Jaipur item No. 10

Hall fair and mat


7 Water tanker for drinking 1 500.00 500.00

8 Kalajattha 1 2000.00 2000.00 Issue based entertainment


TOTAL 20000.00

Detailed Estimate of Institution Building



S. No Activity No of trainee/ Units No of Days Rates Total Amt (Rs) References Remark

1 Food and Logistics 25 2 100.00 5000.00 Cir.No. 1147-1200 Dt 12.07.04 Dir WDSC Jaipur item No. 1 per trainee/day

2 Transportation charges 3 2 2000.00 12000.00 Jeep hired as per actual bill/day

3 Banner & extension materials 25 1 100.00 1000.00

4 Literature and stationery 25 1 150.00 3300.00 Cir.No. 1147-1200 Dt 12.07.04 Dir WDSC Jaipur item No. 11


with Bag

5 Lodging and Boarding 25 1 300.00 7500.00 Cir.No. 1147-1200 Dt 12.07.04 Dir WDSC Jaipur item No. 10 Hall fair and mat

6 Photography & videography 1 2 500.00 1000.00 Either soft/ hard copy

7 Resource persons Charges 3 2 200.00 1200.00

8 Meeting with model beneficiry 1 2 2000.00 4000.00

TOTAL 35000.00

Detailed Estimate of Exposure visit [External]

A-160,Subhash Nagar,Bhilwara,Rajasthan 311001Integrated Watershed Management Programme, Jahazpur

Foundation For Ecological Security

S. No ActivityNo of

trainee/ Units

No of Days Rates Total Amt (Rs) References Remark

1 Food and Logistics 25 1 50.00 1250.00 Cir.No. 1147-1200 Dt 12.07.04 Dir WDSC Jaipur item No. 1

per trainee/day

2 Transportation charges 3 1 2000.00 6000.00 Jeep hired as per actual bill/day

3 Banner & extension materials 5 1 100.00 500.00

4 Literature and stationery 25 1 100.00 2500.00 Cir.No. 1147-1200 Dt 12.07.04 Dir WDSC Jaipur item No. 11

Folder, Pen, dairy and

study material with

Bag5 Kalajattha 1 1 2000.00 2000.00

6 Photography & videography 1 1 1000.00 1000.00 Either soft/ hard copy

7 Resource persons Charges 3 1 200.00 600.008 Miscellaneus charges 1 1 1150.00 1150.00

TOTAL 15000.00

Detailed Estimate of Exposure visit Internal [Local]



S. No ActivityNo of

trainee/ Units


1 Food and Logistics 25 100.00 2500.00Cir.No. 1147-1200 Dt 12.07.04 Dir WDSC Jaipur item No. 1

Per trainee/day


3 Banner & extension materials 2 100.00 200.00

4 Literature and stationery 25 50.00 1250.00Cir.No. 1147-1200 Dt 12.07.04 Dir WDSC Jaipur item No. 11


with Bag5 Venue and Tantages 1 450.00 450.00


7 Resource persons Charges 3 200.00 600.00TOTAL 10000.00

Detailed Estimate of Field training



S. No ActivityNo of

trainee/ Units


1 Food / Tea and Logistics 400 100.00 40000.00 Cir.No. 1147-1200 Dt 12.07.04 Dir WDSC Jaipur item No. 1 Per trainee/day


3 One day small truck hire charge for railly 1 1000.00 1000.00

4 Two days vehicle hire charges for rally 4 1000.00 4000.00

5 Banner & extension materials 10 250.00 2500.00


Folder, Pen, dairy and study material with Bag

7 Venue and Tantages 2 1000.00 2000.00


9 Kalajattha 2 2000.00 4000.0010 Water tanker for drinking 2 500.00 1000.00

11 Awards / Prizes for excellent padyatries 5 700.00 3500.00

TOTAL 75000.00


Integrated Watershed Management Programme, JahazpurDetailed Estimate of Padyatra / Campaign for two days

S. No Items Days of camp Rates Total Amt (Rs) Remark

1 Medicine 1 6200.00 6200.00 As discussion with Department of Animal Husbandry

2 Resource person charges 4 200.00 800.003 Extension of program 1 2000.00 2000.004 Kalajattha 1 2000.00 2000.005 Food and logistics 1 7000.00 7000.006 Transportation 1 5000.00 5000.007 Tentages 1 1500.00 1500.00

TOTAL 24500.00

Detailed Estimate of Vatenary and Health Camp



S. No ActivityNo of

trainee/ Units










TOTAL 8000.00


Integrated Watershed Management Programme, JahazpurDetailed Estimate of building capacity of SHGs

S. No Activity Unit Unit Rate Total Amt (Rs) References Remark

1 Wall paintings Per square fit 250 15.00 3750.00

2 Pamplets and Brocheures Per thousand copy 4 400.00 1600.00 Per thousand

3 Flex banners Per square fit 50 9.00 450.005 Photography & videography No. 2 500.00 1000.006 Miscellaneous charges 1 1200.00 1200.00

TOTAL 8000.00


Integrated Watershed Management Programme, JahazpurDetailed Estimate of Sinage,Wall painting and Boards

Sr.no Particulars Measurement Unit1 Bottom length 12 meters2 Bottom width 12 meters3 Top length 16 meters4 Top width 16 meters5 Depth 2 meters6 Side slope (V:H) of the bund 1:01 1

Sr.no Particulars Measurement Unit1 Average length 14 meters2 Average width 14 meters3 Depth 2 meters4 Volume 392 Cum

Sr.no Hydrologic data1 Runoff coefficient 112 Catchment area 13 Q ( cum) 0.354 storage capacity(cum) 392

Sr.no Particulars Percentage Length Width Depth Volume Unit1 Site clearance 100% 16 16 256.00 Sqm2 Excavation 100% 400.00 CumA Hard soil 15% 60.00 CumB moorum 20% 80.00 CumC Disintegrated rock 65% 260.00 Cum

Sr.no Particulars Unit Volume Rate Cost1 Site clearance cum 256.00 1.36 348.22 Excavation of hard soil cum 60.00 91.00 5460.03 Excavation of moorum cum 80.00 99.00 7920.04 Excavation of disintegrated rock cum 260.00 134.00 34840.06 Stone pitching at Bund sqm 36.00 195.00 7020.07 Stone slab on inlet sqm 20.00 195.00 3900.08 Transportation of Stone cum 12.88 390.00 5023.29 Soil Lift charge above 1.5 m cum 78.25 11.00 860.810 PVC Pipe(110mm dia.) for disposal of excess Water m 3.00 178.00 534.011 Grass seed

Stylohemata Kg. 3.00 55.00 165.0Dhaman Kg. 3.00 70.00 210.0

12 Sowing of tree seed on ridges. Rm 192.00 0.59 113.3FYM application on bundPurchasing of manure Kg. 480.00 2.00 960.0

14 Manure application on bund Rm 240.00 0.20 48.015 Tree seed

Subabul Kg. 1.00 18.00 18.0Neem Kg. 1.00 20.00 20.0

16Brick Work 75 mm thick on the inner face & base of the pond sqm 302.39 208.00 62897.5Total Cost 130337.9Contingency @ 3% 3910.1Grand Total 134248.0Estimated Costing Say Rs. 134200.0

Sr.no. Particular Quantiy Labour cost Skilled person cost

material cost Total Total

1 Site clearence 256 348.2 0.0 0.0 348.2 258.62 Excavation of hard soil 60.00 5022.0 438.0 0.0 5460.0 35740.03 Excavation of moorum 80.00 7200.0 720.0 0.0 7920.0 0.04 Excavation of disintegrated rock 260.00 32656.0 2184.0 0.0 34840.0 0.05 Stone Pitching on Bund 36.00 1458.0 2160.0 3402.0 7020.0 3240.06 Stone slab on inlet 20.00 810.0 1200.0 1890.0 3900.0 3900.07 Transportation of Stone 12.88 0.0 0.0 5023.2 5023.2 5023.28 Lift charges 78.25 860.8 0.0 0.0 860.8 626.09 PVC Pipe(110mm dia.) for disposal of excess Water 3.00 0.0 0.0 534.0 534.0 534.0

10 Grass seeding 6.00 0.0 0.0 375.0 375.0 488.311 Sowing of tree seed on ridges. 192.00 113.3 0.0 0.0 113.312 Purchasing of manure 480.00 0.0 960.0 960.0 960.013 FYM application on bund 240.00 0.0 48.0 48.0 48.014 Tree seeding 2.00 0.0 38.0 38.0 #REF!15 Brick Work 75 mm thick 302.39 6047.8 16329.2 40520.5 62897.5

Total Cost 54516.0 23031.2 52790.7 130337.9Contingencies, 3% 1635.5 690.9 1583.72 3910.14Total 134248.0

134200.0

As per BSR 2011- page-3, item no.22 b

As per BSR 2011- page-0, Sr.no.-45

As per BSR 2011- page-14, item no.145

13

Say Rs.

Local rateLocal rate As per BSR 2011- page-15, Item-157

Local rateLocal rate

Costing of Dugout Pond

BSR 2011- page-10. item-95BSR 2011- page-17, item-189(b)BSR 2011- page-17, item-189(c)

BSR 2011- page-1, item-3

Remarks

As per BSR 2011- page-17, Item-198BSR 2011- page-1, item-2(c)

As per BSR 2011- page-0, Item-9 As per BSR 2011- page-17, Item-198


Tehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State - Rajasthan, IndiaMODEL ESTIMATE OF FARM POND

Quantity estimation

Dimention for construction & costing of Farm Pond


Wid

th

Length

Layout plan of Farm Pond

16m

12 mSide Slope 1:1

12 m

16m

Cross section of bund- 0.54 sqm 0.54 bw 1.5mt Ht 0.6 Mt TW 0.3mtTop Width 0.30

Length per Ha 150 Rmt Bottom Width 1.50Height 0.30

Labour Total Labour Total1 Dug belling work up to 5-7 cm depth (rate as

per BSR-2011, P.no. 14, item no. 156)300 Rm 1.00 1.00 300.00 300.00

2 Earth work for construction of bund including ramming compaction and dressing up to the lead of 50m and lift 1.5 m

(a) Earth work in soft soil (50%) (rate as per BSR-2011, P.no. 17, item no. 188A)

40.50 Cum 77.00 77.00 3118.50 3118.50

(b) Earth work in hard soil (50%) Rate as per BSR-2011, P.no. 17, item no. 188B)

40.50 Cum 85.00 85.00 3442.50 3442.50

3 Pipe Outlet construction (As per market Rate) 2 Rm 0.00 273.00 0.00 546.00

4 Grass seed 0.00 0.00

(a) Stylo hamata 4 Kg. 0.00 55.00 0.00 220.00

(b) Dhaman 4 Kg. 0.00 70.00 0.00 280.00

5 Sowing of seed on bunds 600 Rm 0.59 0.59 354.00 354.00

6 Supply of Saplings

(a) Karounda 75 No,s 0.00 4.00 0.00 300.00

(b) Alovera 75 No,s 0.00 4.00 0.00 300.00

7 Transportation cost of saplings from 50 kmdistance.(rate as per BSR-2011, P.no. 14, itemno. 139 A & B)

150 No,s 0.20 8.64 29.40 1295.25

8 Pit digging (0.3mx0.3mx0.3m) (rate as per BSR-2011, P.no. 14, item no. 142 A )

150 No,s 1.80 1.80 270.00 270.00

Manure for plants

Purchasing of neem kake for pit treatment.7.5 Kg. 0.00 20.00 0.00 150.00

Purchasing of manure for pit treatment.375 Kg. 0.00 2.00 0.00 750.00

10 Manure application of plants (rate as per BSR-2011, P.no. 14, item no. 145)

150 No,s 0.27 0.27 40.50 40.50

11 Planting work of Saplings (rate as per BSR-2011, P.no. 14, item no. 147 B)

150 No,s 3.00 3.00 450.00 450.00

12 Two times watering to the plant with 15 litersper plant. (rate as per BSR-2011, P.no. 14, itemno. 148)

150 No,s 3.70 3.70 555.00 555.00

13Transportation Cost of water from 5 kmdistance. (rate as per BSR-2011, P.no. 14, itemno. 140A)

150 No,s 0.00 3.48 0.00 522.30

8559.90 12894.05386.82

13280.8713300.00

0.3

9

TotalAdd contingency @ 3%

Grand TotalSay amount

Foundation For Ecological SecurityIntegrated Watershed Management Programme, Jahazpur

Tehsil – Jahazpur, District - Bhilwara, State - Rajasthan, IndiaMODEL ESTIMATE FOR FARM BUNDING (Medbandi)

S.no. Item Quantity Unit Rate Amount

1:1 0.60 1:1

. 0.4 1.50.36

1.5 All dimensions are in meter

Sr.no Particulars Measurement Unit1 Bottom length 12 meters2 Bottom width 12 meters3 Top length 16 meters4 Top width 16 meters5 Depth 2 meters6 Side slope (V:H) of the bund 1:01 1

Sr.no Particulars Measurement Unit1 Average length 14 meters2 Average width 14 meters3 Depth 2 meters4 Volume 392 Cum

Sr.no Hydrologic data1 Runoff coefficient 112 Catchment area 13 Q ( cum) 0.354 storage capacity(cum) 392

Sr.no Particulars Percentage Length Width Depth Volume Unit1 Site clearance 100% 16 16 256.00 Sqm2 Excavation 100% 400.00 CumA Hard soil 15% 0.3 60.00 CumB moorum 20% 0.4 80.00 CumC Disintegrated rock 65% 1.3 260.00 Cum

Sr.no Particulars Unit Volume Rate Cost1 Site clearance cum 256.00 1.36 348.22 Excavation of hard soil cum 60.00 91.00 5460.03 Excavation of moorum cum 80.00 99.00 7920.04 Excavation of disintegrated rock cum 260.00 134.00 34840.05 Stone pitching at Bund sqm 28.80 195.00 5616.06 Stone slab on inlet sqm 18.00 195.00 3510.08 Soil Lift charge above 1.5 m cum 78.25 11.00 860.8

9PVC Pipe(110mm dia.) for disposal of excess Water m 3.00 178.00 534.0

10 Grass seedStylohemata Kg. 3.00 55.00 165.0Dhaman Kg. 3.00 70.00 210.0

11 Sowing of tree seed on ridges. Rm 192.00 0.59 113.312 FYM application on bund13 Purchasing of manure Kg. 480.00 2.00 960.014 Manure application on bund Rm 240.00 0.20 48.015 Tree seed

Subabul Kg. 1.00 18.00 18.0Neem Kg. 1.00 20.00 20.0Total Cost 60623.2Contingency @ 3% 1818.7Grand Total 62441.9Estimated Costing Say Rs. 62400

Sr.no. Particular Quantiy Labour cost Skilled person cost

material cost

Total Total

1 Site clearence 256 348.2 0.0 0.0 348.2 258.62 Excavation of hard soil 60.00 5022.0 438.0 0.0 5460.0 35740.03 Excavation of moorum 80.00 7200.0 720.0 0.0 7920.0 0.04 Excavation of disintegrated rock 260.00 32656.0 2184.0 0.0 34840.0 0.05 Stone Pitching on Bund 28.80 1166.4 1728.0 2721.6 5616.06 Stone slab on inlet 18.00 729.0 1080.0 1701.0 3510.0 3510.08 Lift charges 78.25 860.8 0.0 0.0 860.8 626.09 PVC Pipe(110mm dia.) for disposal of excess Water 3.00 0.0 0.0 534.0 534.0 534.0

10 Grass seeding 6.00 0.0 0.0 375.0 375.0 488.311 Sowing of tree seed on ridges. 192.00 113.3 0.0 0.0 113.312 Purchasing of manure 480.00 0.0 0.0 960.0 960.0 960.013 FYM application on bund 240.00 0.0 0.0 48.0 48.0 48.014 Tree seeding 2.00 0.0 0.0 38.0 38.0 #REF!

Total 48095.59 6150.00 6377.60 60623.19Contingencies, 3% 1442.9 184.5 191.3 1818.70Total 62441.9

62400

Local Rate

As per BSR 2011- page-0, Sr.no.-45

As per BSR 2011- page-14, item no.145

Say Rs


As per BSR 2011- page-15, Item-157


BSR 2011- page-1, item-3

Remarks

As per BSR 2011- page-17, Item-198BSR 2011- page-1, item-2(c)

As per BSR 2011- page-17, Item-198

Costing of Dugout Pond

BSR 2011- page-10. item-95BSR 2011- page-17, item-189(b)BSR 2011- page-17, item-189(c)


Tehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State - Rajasthan, India

MODEL ESTIMATE OF EARTHEN DUGOUT POND

Quantity estimation

Dimention for construction & costing of Farm Pond


Wid

th

Length

Layout plan of Farm Pond

16 m

12 mSide Slope 1:1

12 m

16 m

0.54 bw 1.5mt Ht 0.6 Mt TW 0.3mt3 Top Width 0.30

150 Rmt Bottom Width 1.50Height 0.30

Labour Total Labour Total1 Dug belling work up to 5-7 cm depth 300 Rm 1.00 1.00 300.00 300.00

2 Earth work for construction of bund including ramming compaction and dressing up to the lead of 50m and lift 1.5 m

a Earth work in Hard soil (50%) (rate as per BSR-2011, P.no. 17, item no. 188A)

40.50 Cum 77.00 77.00 3118.50 3118.50

b Earth work in Murrum (50%) Rate as per BSR-2011, P.no. 17, item no. 188B)

40.50 Cum 85.00 85.00 3442.50 3442.50

3 Stone Outlet construction (As per BSR 2011page no- 3 ,item no-24b)

0.81 Cum 273.00 706.00 221.13 571.86

4 Grass seeda Stylo hamata 6 Kg. 0.00 55.00 0.00 330.00b Dhaman 6 Kg. 0.00 70.00 0.00 420.005 Sowing of grass seed on bunds 600 Rm 0.59 0.59 354.00 354.0013 Tree Planting

Desibabul 0.1 Kg. 0.00 18.00 0.00 1.80Khakra(beutea) 0.3 Kg. 0.00 20.00 0.00 6.00

14 Sowing of tree seed on ridges. 150 Rm 0.59 0.59 88.50 88.5015 Ploughing by tractor cultivator and grass seed

broadcasting (seed rate 6 to 8 kgs/ha) cost ofseed not included (rate as per BSR-2011, P.no.15, item no.163) 0.80 Ha. 284.00 922.00 227.20 737.60Total 9370.76Add contingency @ 3% 281.12Grand Total 9651.88Say am 9700.00

0.3

Amount


UnitQuantity

Integrated Watershed Management Programme, JahazpurTehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State - Rajasthan, India

Cross section of Outlet- 0.27 sqm Length(M)Cross section of bund- 0.54 sqm

MODEL ESTIMATE FOR PASTURE DEVELOPMENT ON PRIVATE LAND

Length per Ha

ItemS.no. Rate

1:1 0.60

1:1

. 0.4 1.50.36

1.5 All dimentions are in meter

Name of Village :- Name of site :- Chragah Plot no. -1 ( )

Name of Work :- Pasture Land Development Work Jal Grahan Vikash Samiti

1.00 Ha. Area for trenching, Size of trench 0.45 mt. Depth 0.45 mt. Width50.0 Mt. Contour to contour intervals 0.2025 Sqm cross section area of trench

55 MM / Hr. Rainfall intensity of area 0.5 Hr. (Tc) duration 550.00 mm Av. rainfall25% Runoff co oficient Runoff arrested 60.00% 41.25 Cum. in one hectare

203.70 Mt. trenching length required in one hectare of land Say CCT/ha. 200.00 41.25 Cum. In this plot.70.00 Rmt. Length of thor fence per ha. No of thor sticks in one meter length 8.0010% Damaging due to transportation, rehandling and planting350 Plants to be planted in one hectare Say 350 30.53 5.5 x 5.5 mt. Spacing

0.75 Mt. Height of LBCD, Bottom width of LBCD3.5 Top width 0.5 Length of LBCD Mt.1.5 Sqm Cross section area of LBCD, No. of LBCD required per ha. 1.00 3.00

0.90 Mt. Depth of cattle protection trench, Top width 1.2 Bottom width0.90.945 Sqm cross section area of trench 70.00 Rmt. Length of cattle protection trench per ha.

S.no Particular Unit Quantity Rate Amount Quantity Rate Amount Quantity Rate Amount 1 Dug belling work up to 5 to 7 cm depth. Rmt. 140 1 140.002 Excavation of cattle protection trench Cum 66.15a Excavation of cattle protection trench in hard soil 20%. Cum 13.23 91 1203.93

bExcavation of cattle protection trench in Ordinary murram 40%.

Cum 26.46 99 2619.54

c Excavation of cattle protection trench in Disintigreted rock 40%. Cum 26.46 134 3545.643 Supply and cutting of 80 cm thor sticks. Per 100 stick 6 174 1071.84 1.54 174 267.96

4Transportation cost of thor sticks through bullock cart from 5 kmdistance, loading & unloading. Per 100 stick 6 100 616.00 1.54 100 154

5 Rehandling work of thor sticks up to 200 to 500mt distance. Per 100 stick 6 76.5 471.24 1.54 76.5 117.816 Planting of Thor sticks. Rmt. 140 6.93 970.20 35 6.93 242.557 Layout ( by A-farm or dumpy level) for contouring. Rmt. 200 0.31 62.008 Dug belling work up to 5 to 7 cm depth for contouring. Rmt. 200 0.74 148.0030% CCT Excavation in 30 % hard soil for trenching. Cum 12.15 75.00 911.2570% CCT Excavation in 70 % ordinary murram for trenching. Cum 28.35 99.00 2806.6530% Pit digging in hard soil of size 45x45x45 Cm. Cum 105 6.8 714.00 26.25 6.8 178.5 15.75 5.5 86.62570% Pit digging in moorm soil of size 45x45x45 Cm. Cum 245 13.4 3283.00 61.25 13.4 820.75 36.75 9.9 363.825

11 Treatment of pit by FYM. Per pit 350 0.27 94.50 87.5 0.27 23.625 52.5 0.2 10.5Purchasing of neem cake for pit treatment. Kg. 35 20.00 700.00Purchasing of manure for pit treatment. Kg. 1750 2.00 3500.00

12 Cost of saplings Per plant 350 4.00 1400.00 87.5 4.0 350 52.5 4.0 21013 Plantation work Per pit 350 3.00 1050.00 87.5 3.0 262.5 52.5 3.0 157.514 Transportation Cost of saplings from 40 km distance. Per 1000 Plant 0.35 5035.0 1762.25 0.0875 5035.0 440.5625 0.0525 5035.0 264.3375

15Ring making of 0.5 Mt. Radius & 30 Cm. width X 20 Cm. Depth. Per plant 350 2.40 840.00 87.5 2.40 210.00 52.50 2.40 126.00

A Two times watering to the plant with 15 liters per plant. Per plant 350 3.70 1295.00 87.5 3.70 323.75 52.50 3.70 194.25B Transportation Cost of water from 10 km distance. Per 1000 Plant 0.35 3056.00 1069.60 0.0875 3056.0 267.40 0.05 3056.0 160.4417 Interculture operation. Per plant 350 1.20 420.00 87.5 1.2 105.00 52.50 1.2 63.00

18Ploughing by tractor cultivator and grass seed broadcasting(seed rate 6 to 8 kgs/ha) cost of seed not included Ha. 0.75 845.00 633.75 0.1875 845.0 158.44 0.11 845.0 95.06

50% Stylo hamata Kg. 6 55.00 330.0050% Dhaman Kg. 6 70.00 420.00

19Making pallets of mixture of fine soil, grass seed, manure etc(seed rate 6 to 8 kgs/ha) cost of seed not included Kg. 12.00 18.90 226.80

20 Tree seedDeshibabool Kg. 0.30 18.00 5.40

Khakhra Kg. 1.00 20.00 20.00Neem Kg. 0.70 20.00 14.00

21 Sowing of tree seed on ridges. Rmt. 270.00 0.59 159.30

23Loose boulder check dam in side the plot.(per Ha. One LBCD)(As per BSR 2011 page no- 3 ,item no-24b) Cum 4.5 706.00 3177.00

Rs.35,680.89 Sub total 3140.525 Sub total 2513.86Rs.41,335.28Rs.1,240.06

Grand Total Rs.42,575Rs.42,600

Third Year

Foundation for Ecological SecurityIWMP Watershed Jahajpur


Costing & Quantity Estimation of Pasture Land Development

First Year

Contingency 3%

Total cost of pasture land development

Total Cost

second Year

UnitLabour Total Labour Total

1 Dug belling work for CCT up to 5-7 cm depth (As per BSR 2011, P.no. 14, item no. 156)

300 Rm 1 1 300.0 300.0

2 Lay out By A- Frame (As per BSR 2011, P.no. 14, item no. 155(a))

300 Rm 0.31 0.31 93.0 93.0

3 Excavation of hard soil for CCT (As perBSR 2011, P.no. 17, item no. 188 b)40%

24.3 Cum 85 85 2065.5 2065.5

4 Excavation of murram for CCT (As perBSR 2011, P.no. 17, item no. 189 c) 60%

36.5 Cum 99 99 3608.6 3608.6

5 grass seeding on bundDhaman 3 Kg. 0 70 0.0 210.0

Stylo hamata 3 Kg. 0 55 0.0 165.06 Sowing of Grass seed on bund 600 Rm 0.59 0.59 354.0 354.0

Sub-Total 6421.05 6796.05Contingency @ 3% 203.9Grand Total 6999.9

Says Rs 7000.0

Amount

MODEL ESTIMATE OF CCTTotal length of CCT per ha =300 rm/ha

CX= 0.2025 CumQuantityItemS.no. Rate

GPS Position Latitude :-GPS Position Longitude :-Name of Village Institution :-

Name of Work :-

A-160,Subhash Nagar,Bhilwara,Rajasthan 311001Integrated Watershed Management Programme, Jahazpur



Name of site :- Name of Village :-

12 Tw - 2m Ht. - 2 m Bw - 10 m

110

Labour Total Labour Total1 Total e/w excavation for bund 1320 Cum2 Earth work in soft soil for

construction of bund includingramming compaction and dressing upto the lead of 50m and lift 1.5 m(Asper BSR2011, P.no. 17, item no.188A)

264 Cum 77 77 20328 20328

3 Earth work in hard soil forconstruction of bund includingramming compaction and dressing upto the lead of 50m and lift 1.5 m(Asper BSR2011, P.no. 17, item no.188B)

528 Cum 85 85 44880 44880

4 Earth work in Murrum Mixed soil forconstruction of bund includingramming compaction and dressing upto the lead of 50m and lift 1.5 m(Asper BSR2011, P.no. 17, item no.189C)

528 Cum 99 99 52272 52272

5 Extra lift charge Above 1.50 m height(As per BSR2011, P.no. 1, item no. 3)

792 Cum 11 11 8712 8712

6 Pitching at the upstream face of bundwill be provided as per BSR 2011page no-17 ,item no-198

120 Sqm 100.5 195 12060 23400

7 Grass seedDhaman 40.0 Kg. 0 70.0 0 2800Sowing of Grass Seeds on bund 660.0 Rm 0.59 0.59 389.4 389.4

8 Manual ramming for bund (As perBSR 2010, P.no.17, item no. 199(a) )

660 Cum 14.2 14.2 9372 9372

Total 148013.4 162153.44864.602

167018.00167000.00

2 m

D/S 1:1.5 U/S 1:2.5

10 m

ItemS.no. Quantity

Foundation for Ecological Security

Tehsil - Jahazpur, District - Bhilwara, State - Rajasthan, IndiaType of structure :- Nadi

Contingency @ 3%Grand Total

Say Rs.

Length of bund -m

RateUnit

IWMP Watershed Jahajpur

Amount

Side slope(V:H)- D/S-1:1.5 , U/S-1:2.5

Cross section of bund- sqmMODEL ESTIMATE FOR NADI

:-:-

General features of anicut-:Height of crest= 1 M.Length of Crest 16 M.Depth of foundation for H.W. = 1.5 M. 2.0 M.Bottom width of H.W. = 2.5 M. 1.3 M.

1.3 M. Bottom width of Wing wall= 1.0 M.Length of H.W.Ext = 5.0 M. Depth of foundation for Wing wall = 1.0 M.Height of H.W.Ext. at H.W. = 2.3 M. 0.15 M.Top Width of H.W.Ext.= 0.6 M. Top & Bottom width of Toe wall= 0.30 M.Bottom width for H.W.Ext. 1.0 M. Depth of foundation for Toe wall = 0.8 M.Depth of foundation for H.W.Ext.= 2.0 M. 0.8 M.Length of side wall= 4.0 M. 2.0 M.Bottom Width of S.W. 1.00 M.Height of side wall at W.W.End= 1.3 M.Depth of foundation for side wall = 1.5 M.

S.No. No L B H1

1 50 6 300.00 Sqm.

Total 300.002

250 X 6.0 = 300 Sqm.

3

2 50 x 6 x 0.15 = 90

Total 90 Cum.4

2 50 4 2 800 cum5

Total

Berm 0.00 Cum.H.W. 1 X 16 X 2.7 X 1.5 = 64.80H.W.Ext 2 X 5.0 X 1.2 X 2.0 = 24.00 Cum.S.W. 2 X 4.0 X 1.00 X 1.5 = 12.00 Cum.W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 1.0 X 0.75 = 3.00 Cum.Apron 1 X 16 X 2.0 X 0.75 = 24.00 Cum.T.W. 1 X 16 X 0.30 X 0.8 = 3.60 Cum.

Total 131.401 30% 39.422 60% 78.843 10% 13.14

Name of VillageName of Site

0Near Devnarayan Temple

DETAILED ESTIMATE OF ANICUT

Foundation for Ecological SecurityIWMP Watershed

Earth work excavation for foundation in dry ormoist soil including ramming of bottomscrapping of sides dipodal of soil intial lift upto 1.5 m and lead up to 30M( As per itemNo.2(c) Page no.-1& item no. 189 (b),(c) pageno.-17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)

Tehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State: Rajasthan, India

Item

Execavation in DIR

Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep( As per itemno. 156 page 14 of G.K.N.2011 BSR ofBhilwara circle)

Benching of the base and depositing theexecavated material for bund dressing etc. allcomponents( As per item no. 200(b) page 17of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)

Execavation in Hard soil

Earth work filling behind foundation dry ormoist soil including laying in layer of 15cm.Breaking of clods dressing to require profilewith manual compaction including intial lift upto 1.5 m and lead up to 50M. ( As per item no.

Execavation in Murrum

Top of H.W =Height of Wing wall=Length of wing wall=

Width of Apron =

contd..

Height of Toewall=

Thickness of Apron=

Quantity

Cutting and clearing of ordinary jungleincludling bushes shrubs and disposal as perinstructrion of engineer incharge( As per itemno. 95 page 10 of G.K.N.2011 BSR ofBhilwara circle)

Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep( As per itemno. 156 page 14 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of

6

H.W. 1 X 16.0 X 2.7 X 0.3 = 12.96 Cum.H.W.Ext 2 X 5 X 1.2 X 0.3 = 3.60 Cum.S.W. 2 X 4 X 1.00 X 0.3 = 2.40 Cum.W.W. 2 X 2 X 1.0 X 0.3 = 1.20 Cum.Apron 1 X 16.0 X 2.0 X 0.3 = 9.60 Cum.T.W. 1 X 16.0 X 0.30 X 0.3 = 1.44 Cum.

Total 31.207

H.W. 1 X 16.0 X 2.5 X 1.2 = 48.00 Cum.H.W.Ext 2 X 5.0 X 1.2 X 1.7 = 20.40 Cum.S.W. 2 X 4.0 X 1.00 X 1.2 = 9.60 Cum.W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 1.0 X 0.5 = 1.80 Cum.T.W. 1 X 16.0 X 0.15 X 0.5 = 1.08 Cum.

Total 80.88 Cum.8

H.W. 1 X 16.0 X 1.9 X 1 = 30.40 Cum.H.W.Ext 2 X 5.0 X 0.8 X 2.3 = 18.40 Cum.S.W. 2 X 4.0 X 0.8 X 1.80 = 11.52 Cum.W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 1.0 X 1.3 = 5.20 Cum.T.W. 1 X 16.0 X 0.30 X 0.15 = 0.72 Cum.

Total 66.24 Cum.9

Apron 1 X 16.0 X 2.0 X 0.30 9.60 Cum.Total 9.60 Cum.

10

H.W. 1 X 16.0 X 1.3 X 0.1 = 2.08 Cum.H.W.Ext 2 X 5.0 X 0.6 X 0.05 = 0.30 Cum.S.W. 2 X 4.0 X 0.6 X 0.05 = 0.24 Cum.W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 1.0 X 0.05 = 0.20 Cum.T.W. 1 X 16.0 X 0.30 X 0.1 = 0.48 Cum.Apron 1 X 16.0 X 2.0 X 0.15 = 4.80 Cum.

Total 8.10 Cum.11

H.W. 0 X 16.0 X 1.6 = 0.00 Sqm.Total 0.00 Sqm.

12

H.W. 1 X 16.0 X 4.7 = 75.20H.W.Ext. 2 X 5.0 X 2.9 = 29.00S.S 2 X 4.0 X 2.9 = 23.20W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 1.9 = 7.60T.W. 2 X 16.0 X 0.2 = 4.80

Total = 139.8013

0 4 x 4 = 0.00

Random rubble stone masonary for foundation & plinth cement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As per item no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)

Random rubble stone masonary for Super Structure cement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As per item no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)

Providing and laying of cement concrete wellmixed in cement mortar 1:2:4 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing with maxmium sizeof aggregate up to 12 mm.etc. complete ( As per item no. 194 page 17of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)

Dry stone pitching of Hammer dressed witchpacking of voids of small stone including alllifts in require profile (23 cm depth)( As peritem no. 198 page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR ofBhilwara circle)

Providing and laying of cement concrete wellmixed in cement mortar 1:4:8 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing with maxmium sizeof aggregate up to 50 mm. ( As per item no.191 page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwaracircle)

Random rubble stone masonary for Aproncement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As peritem no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR

Flush pointing in cement motar (1:3)( As per item no. page of G.K.N.2011 BSR of

Bhilwara circle)25 m.m thick plastering on new surface in cement mortar (1:4)( As per item no. 70(a)

page 8 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)

:-:-



S.No. No L B H1

0 50 6 0.00 Sqm.

Total 0.002

2 40 X 1.0 = 40 Sqm.

3

2 40 x 1 x 0.15 = 12

Total 12 Cum.

4(a)4(b)

2 100 4 2 1600 cum5

Total


Total 13.501 30% 4.052 60% 8.103 10% 1.35


TaswariyaNear Devkaran Regar Farm





Execavation in DIR



Execavation in Hard soilExecavation in Murrum

Earth work for bund manking & filling behind foundation dry or moist soil including laying in layer of 15cm. Breaking of clods dressing to require profile with manual compaction including intial lift up to 1.5 m and lead up to 50M. ( As per item no. 5 page 1 of G.K.N.2011 BSR )

Earth work for including intial lift up to 1.5 m and lead up to 50M. ( As per item no. 5 page 1 of G.K.N.2011 BSR )


Width of Apron =

Item

Height of Toewall=

Thickness of Apron=

Quantity



6


Total 5.407


Total 12.60 Cum.8


Total 18.00 Cum.9


10


Total 16.93 Cum.11


12

H.W. 1 X 89.0 X 3.7 = 329.30H.W.Ext. 2 X 15.0 X 2.6 = 78.00S.W. 2 X 15.0 X 1.7 = 51.00W.W. 0 X 2.0 X 2.4 = 0.00T.W. 0 X 89.0 X 0.2 = 0.00

Total = 458.3013

0 4 x 4 = 0.00










contd..

:-:-

Quatity Unit

Labour Total Labour Total

1

0.00 Cum. 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00

2

40 Sqm. 1.36 1.36 54.40 54.403

12 Cum. 85.00 85.00 1020.00 1020.004(b)

1600.00 Cum. 91.00 91.00 145600.00 145600.005

13.50 Cum. 0.00 0.004.05 Cum. 91.00 91.00 368.55 368.558.10 Cum. 99.00 99.00 801.90 801.901.35 Cum. 134.00 134.00 180.90 180.90

6

5.40 Cum. 318 1643 1717.20 8872.20

7

12.60 Cum. 342 1252 4309.20 15775.208

18.00 Cum. 342 1252 6156.00 22536.009

0.00 Cum. 342 1252 0.00 0.0010

16.93 Cum. 312 2694 5282.16 45609.4211 Flush pointing in cement motar (1:3)( As per item no. page of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)0.00 Sqm. 24.2 0.00 0.0012

458.30 Sqm. 65.7 138 30110.31 63245.4013

0.00 Cum. 100.5 195 0.00 0.00195600.6 304064.0

9121.9313185.9

1.961.183.13

Labour cost (Lac)Material cost (Lac)Total cost (Lac)

Grand Total

Execavation in DIR

Providing and laying of cement concrete wellmixed in cement mortar 1:4:8 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing with maxmium size ofaggregate up to 50 mm. ( As per item no. 191page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)

Random rubble stone masonary for foundation &plinth cement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As peritem no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR ofBhilwara circle)

Benching of the base and depositing theexecavated material for bund dressing etc. allcomponents( As per item no. 200(b) page 18 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)Earth work for bund manking & filling behindfoundation dry or moist soil including laying inlayer of 15cm. Breaking of clods dressing torequire profile with manual compaction includingintial lift up to 1.5 m and lead up to 50M. ( As peritem no. 5 page 1 of G.K.N.2011 BSR )

Contingency charges @ 3%

Random rubble stone masonary for SuperStructure cement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( Asper item no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSRof Bhilwara circle)


Providing and laying of cement concrete wellmixed in cement mortar 1:2:4 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing with maxmium size ofaggregate up to 12 mm.etc. complete ( As per item no. 194 page 17 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)

25 m.m thick plastering on new surface in cementmortar (1:4)( As per item no. 70(a) page 8 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)

Dry stone pitching of Hammer dressed witchpacking of voids of small stone including all lifts inrequire profile (23 cm depth)( As per item no. 198page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)

SubTotal

Earth work excavation for foundation in dry ormoist soil including ramming of bottom scrappingof sides dipodal of soil intial lift up to 1.5 m andlead up to 30M( As per itemNo. 2(c) Page no.-1&item no. 189 (b),(c) page no.-17 of G.K.N.2011BSR of Bhilwara circle)Execavation in Hard soil

Random rubble stone masonary for Apron cementsand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As per item no.190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwaracircle)

Abstract of Cost of Anicut



Item



Rate Amount

Cutting and clearing of ordinary jungle includlingbushes shrubs and disposal as per instructrion ofengineer incharge( As per item no. 95 page 10 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)

Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep( As per item no.156 page 14 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwaracircle)

S.No.

Quantity Cement Sand Aggrigate StoneCum / Sqm Begs Cum Cum Cum

1 Cement Concrete (1:4:8) 5.400 17.28 2.54 5.08 _2 Plaster in C.C. (1:4) 458.300 114.58 14.67 _ _3 Massonary in Cement (1:6) 30.600 42.84 13.10 _ 33.664 Pointing in Cement 0.000 0.00 0.00 _ _5 Cement concrete coping(1:2:4) 16.93 98.87 7.62 15.246 Dry Stone Pitching 0.000 _ _ _ 0.00

TOTAL 273.57 37.92 20.31 33.66 Say Bags 274 S.No Rate Amount

or 13.70 MT. 1 M/C QT. Rs Rs2 Sand 13 1100 14739

1 Cement 13.7 MT. 3 Stones 12 850 101102 Sand 37.92 Cum. 4 Aggregates 7 700 50243 Stones 33.66 Cum. 5 Cement 274 210 575404 Aggregates 20.31 Cum. 87413

S.No.

Tractor trip

Total Amount

ITEM



Name of Village :-Name of Site :-


Material Statement

:-:-

General features of anicut-:Height of crest= 1.2 M.Length of Crest 18 M.Depth of foundation for H.W. = 1.5 M. 2.0 M.Bottom width of H.W. = 2.4 M. 1.8 M.


S.No. No L B H1

1 20 0.8 16.00 Sqm.

Total 16.002

0100 X 6.0 = 0 Sqm.

3

0 100 x 6 x 0.15 = 0

Total 0 Cum.4

1 20 3.5 2.5 175 cum5

Total


Total 25.501 30% 7.652 60% 15.303 10% 2.55


GandherGandher (Near Farm of Dhannalal Ji Dhakad)





Execavation in DIR




Earth work for desiltation of the structure to enhance its storage capacity including intial lift up to 1.5 m and lead up to 50M. ( As per item no. 189 (a&b) page 17 of G.K.N.2011BSR of Bhilwara circle)


Width of Apron =

Item

contd..

Height of Toewall=

Thickness of Apron=

Quantity



6


Total 7.807


Total 35.40 Cum.8

H.W. 0 X 18.0 X 1.8 X 1.2 = 0.00 Cum.H.W.Ext 1 X 20.0 X 0.8 X 2.0 = 32.00 Cum.S.W. 1 X 8.0 X 1 X 2.60 = 20.80 Cum.W.W. 1 X 2.0 X 1.0 X 1.0 = 2.00 Cum.T.W. 0 X 18.0 X 0.30 X 0.15 = 0.00 Cum.

Total 54.80 Cum.9


10


Total 1.30 Cum.11


12


Total = 202.7213

0 4 x 4 = 0.00










:-:-

Quatity Unit


1

16.00 Cum. 1.00 1.00 16.00 16.00

2

0 Sqm. 1.36 1.36 0.00 0.003

0 Cum. 85.00 85.00 0.00 0.00

4

87.5 Cum. 85 85 7437.50 7437.50

87.5 Cum. 91.0 91.0 7962.50 7962.505

25.50 Cum. 0.00 0.007.65 Cum. 91.00 91.00 696.15 696.15

15.30 Cum. 99.00 99.00 1514.70 1514.702.55 Cum. 134.00 134.00 341.70 341.70

6

7.80 Cum. 318 1643 2480.40 12815.40

7

35.40 Cum. 342 1252 12106.80 44320.808

54.80 Cum. 342 1252 18741.60 68609.609

0.00 Cum. 342 1252 0.00 0.0010


202.72 Sqm. 65.7 138 13318.70 27975.3613

0.00 Cum. 100.5 195 0.00 0.0065021.65 175191.91

5255.76180447.67

0.651.151.80



Rate Amount



S.No.





GandherNear Farm of Dhannalal ji Dhakad

Item







SubTotal

Grand Total

Execavation in DIR



Benching of the base and depositing theexecavated material for bund dressing etc. allcomponents( As per item no. 200(b) page 18 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)Earth work for desiltation of the structure toenhance its storage capacity including intial lift upto 1.5 m and lead up to 50M. ( As per item no. 189(a&b) page 17 of G.K.N.2011BSR of Bhilwaracircle)










GandherNear Farm of Dhannalal ji Dhakad

Material Statement

S.No.

Tractor trip

Total Amount

ITEM

:-:-



S.No. No L B H1

0 50 6 0.00 Sqm.

Total 0.002

0 50 X 6.0 = 300 Sqm.

3

0 50 x 6 x 0.15 = 0

Total 0 Cum.4

1 60 40 1 2400 cum5

Total


Total 21.001 30% 6.302 60% 12.603 10% 2.10

contd..

Height of Toewall=

Thickness of Apron=

Quantity


Width of Apron =

Item


Execavation in DIR






Earth work excavation for foundation in dry ormoist soil including ramming of bottomscrapping of sides dipodal of soil intial lift upto 1.5 m and lead up to 30M( As per item no.2,(b&c) page 1,& item.No.189(c) page-17 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)



GandherGandher Kekri Jane Wale Road ka pas (bhil ke Kuye ke pass)



6

H.W. 1 X 0.0 X 0.2 X 0.2 = 0.00 Cum.H.W.Ext 2 X 0 X 0.2 X 0.2 = 0.00 Cum.S.W. 2 X 9.5 X 1.00 X 0.2 = 3.80 Cum.W.W. 2 X 0 X 0.0 X 0.2 = 0.00 Cum.Apron 1 X 43.0 X 3.0 X 0.3 = 38.70 Cum.T.W. 1 X 43.0 X 0.30 X 0.3 = 3.87 Cum.

Total 46.377


Total 9.74 Cum.8

H.W. 1 X 0.0 X 0.2 X 2.5 = 0.00 Cum.H.W.Ext 2 X 0.0 X 0 X 0.0 = 0.00 Cum.S.W. 2 X 9.5 X 0.2 X 4.50 = 12.83 Cum.W.W. 2 X 0.0 X 0.9 X 2.2 = 0.00 Cum.T.W. 1 X 43.0 X 0.30 X 0.30 = 3.87 Cum.

Total 16.70 Cum.9


10


Total 20.64 Cum.11


12

H.W. 1 X 0.0 X 6.2 = 0.00H.W.Ext. 2 X 0.0 X 0.6 = 0.00S.W 2 X 7.0 X 0.6 = 8.40W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 2.8 = 11.20T.W. 2 X 43.0 X 0.3 = 25.80

Total = 45.4013

0 4 x 4 = 0.00










:-:-

Quatity UnitLabour Total

1 Labour Amount Total Amount

0.00 Cum. 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00

2

300 Sqm. 1.36 1.36 408.00 408.003

0 Cum. 85.00 85.00 0.00 0.004

1200.00 cum 75.00 75.00 90000.00 90000.00

1200.00 Cum. 91.00 91.00 109200.00 109200.005

21.00 Cum. 0.00 0.006.30 Cum. 91.00 91.00 573.30 573.30

12.60 Cum. 99.00 99.00 1247.40 1247.402.10 Cum. 134.00 134.00 281.40 281.40

6

46.37 Cum. 318 1643 14745.66 76185.91

7

9.74 Cum. 342 1252 3331.94 12197.618

16.70 Cum. 342 1252 5709.69 20902.149

38.70 Cum. 342 1252 13235.40 48452.4010


45.40 Sqm. 65.7 138 2982.78 6265.2013

0.00 Cum. 0 0 0.00 0.00248155.25 421317.52

12639.53433957.05

2.481.864.34



Rate Amount



S.No.

Earth work excavation for foundation in dry ormoist soil including ramming of bottom scrappingof sides dipodal of soil intial lift up to 1.5 m andlead up to 30M( As per item no. 2,(b&c) page 1,&item.No.189(c) page-17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR ofBhilwara circle)Execavation in Hard soil




00

Item

Contingency charges @ 3%Total






Grand Total

Execavation in DIR













GandherGandher Kekri Jane Wale Road ka pas (bhil ke Kuye ke pass)

Material Statement

S.No.

Tractor trip

Total Amount

ITEM

:-:-

Quatity Unit


1

66.00 Cum. 1.00 1.00 66.00 66.00

2

0 Sqm. 1.36 1.36 0.00 0.003

0 Cum. 85.00 85.00 0.00 0.00

4

1000 Cum. 85.00 85.00 85000.0 85000.0

1000 Cum. 91.00 91.00 91000.0 91000.05

39.60 Cum. 0.00 0.0011.88 Cum. 91.00 91.00 1081.08 1081.0823.76 Cum. 99.00 99.00 2352.24 2352.243.96 Cum. 134.00 134.00 530.64 530.64

6

19.80 Cum. 318 1643 6296.40 32531.40

7

0.90 Cum. 342 1252 307.80 1126.808

1.80 Cum. 342 1252 615.60 2253.609

18.00 Cum. 342 1252 6156.00 22536.0010


133.40 Sqm. 65.7 138 8764.38 18409.2013

0.00 Cum. 100.5 195 0.00 0.00206884.30 297591.95

8927.76306519.71

2.071.003.07


Grand Total

Execavation in DIR










SubTotal






Item



Rate Amount



S.No.

:-:-



S.No. No L B H1

1 20 3.3 66.00 Sqm.

Total 66.002

00 X 6.0 = 0 Sqm.

3

0 100 x 6 x 0.15 = 0

Total 0 Cum.4

1 40 50 1 2000 cum5

Total


Total 39.601 30% 11.882 60% 23.763 10% 3.96







Execavation in DIR






Width of Apron =

Item

contd..

Height of Toewall=

Thickness of Apron=

Quantity



6


Total 19.807


Total 0.90 Cum.8


Total 1.80 Cum.9


10


Total 15.11 Cum.11


12


Total = 133.4013

0 4 x 4 = 0.00















S.No.

Tractor trip

Total Amount

ITEM





Material Statement

:-:-

Quatity Unit

Labour Total

1Labour Amount

Total Amount

300.00 Cum. 1.00 1.00 300.00 300.00

2

180 Sqm. 1.36 1.36 244.80 244.803

54 Cum. 85.00 85.00 4590.00 4590.004

480.00 Cum. 37.00 37.00 17760.00 17760.005

220.50 Cum. 0.00 0.0066.15 Cum. 91.00 91.00 6019.65 6019.65

132.30 Cum. 99.00 99.00 13097.70 13097.7022.05 Cum. 134.00 134.00 2954.70 2954.70

6

48.00 Cum. 318 1643 15264.00 78864.00

7

148.35 Cum. 342 1252 50735.70 185734.208

181.10 Cum. 342 1252 61936.20 226737.209

12.00 Cum. 342 1252 4104.00 15024.0010


248.20 Sqm. 65.7 138 16306.74 34251.6013

0.00 Cum. 100.5 195 0.00 0.00196464.69 612787.25

18383.62631170.87

1.964.356.31


Grand Total

Execavation in DIR



Benching of the base and depositing theexecavated material for bund dressing etc. allcomponents( As per item no. 200(b) page 17 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)Earth work filling behind foundation dry or moistsoil including laying in layer of 15cm. Breaking ofclods dressing to require profile with manualcompaction including intial lift up to 1.5 m andlead up to 50M. ( As per item no. 5 page 1 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)











0Near Well

Item



Rate Amount



S.No.

:-:-



S.No. No L B H1

1 50 6 300.00 Sqm.

Total 300.002

230 X 6.0 = 180 Sqm.

3

2 30 x 6 x 0.15 = 54

Total 54 Cum.4

2 30 4 2 480 cum5

Total


Total 220.501 30% 66.152 60% 132.303 10% 22.05


0Near Well





Execavation in DIR






Width of Apron =

Item


contd..

Height of Toewall=

Thickness of Apron=

Quantity



6


Total 48.007


Total 148.35 Cum.8


Total 181.10 Cum.9


10


Total 10.10 Cum.11


12


Total = 248.2013

0 4 x 4 = 0.00










:-:-

Ac

10 20.0 10

H.W.Ext.H.W. 1.2

1.0c

S.W.0.6

B 5.0 B

APRON 2

1.2T.W. 0.3


PLAN AND SECTION OF ANICUT

Name of Village 0

0.6

Name of Site

1.80


Near Well

W.W .

W.W

PLAN2A

PLAN

1.7

1.2

1.8

1.7

0.153

1.50.3

SECTION ON A-A'

0.6

3.5

B.L.1

1.5

C-C' SECTION ON H.W.Ext.B-B' SECTION OF S.W.


3.5

BED LEVEL







S.No.

Tractor trip

Total Amount

ITEM




0Near Well

Material Statement

:-:-

Quatity Unit

Labour Total

1Labour Amount

Total Amount

300.00 Cum. 1.00 1.00 300.00 300.00

2

240 Sqm. 1.36 1.36 326.40 326.403

72 Cum. 85.00 85.00 6120.00 6120.004

640.00 Cum. 37.00 37.00 23680.00 23680.005

176.95 Cum. 0.00 0.0053.09 Cum. 91.00 91.00 4830.74 4830.74

106.17 Cum. 99.00 99.00 10510.83 10510.8317.70 Cum. 134.00 134.00 2371.13 2371.13

6

39.30 Cum. 318 1643 12497.40 64569.90

7

115.92 Cum. 342 1252 39642.93 145125.588

118.18 Cum. 342 1252 40417.56 147961.369

10.80 Cum. 342 1252 3693.60 13521.6010


201.80 Sqm. 65.7 138 13258.26 27848.4013

0.00 Cum. 100.5 195 0.00 0.00160388.21 470819.26

14124.58484943.83

1.603.254.85


Grand Total

Execavation in DIR














0Near Ramshingh parmar Farm

Item



Rate Amount



S.No.

:-:-



S.No. No L B H1

1 50 6 300.00 Sqm.

Total 300.002

240 X 6.0 = 240 Sqm.

3

2 40 x 6 x 0.15 = 72

Total 72 Cum.4

2 40 4 2 640 cum5

Total


Total 176.951 30% 53.092 60% 106.173 10% 17.70







Item

Execavation in DIR







Width of Apron =

contd..

Height of Toewall=

Thickness of Apron=

Quantity



6


Total 39.307


Total 115.92 Cum.8


Total 118.18 Cum.9


10


Total 8.78 Cum.11


12


Total = 201.8013

0 4 x 4 = 0.00










:-:-

Ac

10 18.0 10

H.W.Ext.H.W. 1

1.0c

S.W.0.6

B 4.0 B

APRON 2

1.0T.W. 0.3



Name of Village 0

0.6

Name of Site

1.50


Near Ramshingh parmar Farm

W.W .

W.W

PLAN2A

PLAN

1.3

1

1.5

1.3

0.152.5

1.50.3

SECTION ON A-A'

0.6

2.8

B.L.1

1.5



2.8

BED LEVEL







S.No.

Tractor trip

Total Amount

ITEM





Material Statement

:-:-

Quatity Unit

Labour Total

1Labour Amount

Total Amount

300.00 Cum. 1.00 1.00 300.00 300.00

2

240 Sqm. 1.36 1.36 326.40 326.403

72 Cum. 85.00 85.00 6120.00 6120.004

640.00 Cum. 37.00 37.00 23680.00 23680.005

129.40 Cum. 0.00 0.0038.82 Cum. 91.00 91.00 3532.62 3532.6277.64 Cum. 99.00 99.00 7686.36 7686.3612.94 Cum. 134.00 134.00 1733.96 1733.96

6

28.02 Cum. 318 1643 8910.36 46036.86

7

86.89 Cum. 342 1252 29716.38 108786.288

81.92 Cum. 342 1252 28016.64 102563.849

7.20 Cum. 342 1252 2462.40 9014.4010

6.17 Cum. 312 2694 1925.04 16621.9811 Flush pointing in cement motar (1:3)( As per item no. page of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)0.00 Sqm. 0.00 0.0012

153.70 Sqm. 65.7 138 10098.09 21210.6013

0.00 Cum. 100.5 195 0.00 0.00124508.25 347613.30

10428.40358041.70

1.252.343.58


Grand Total

Execavation in DIR














BhilariNear Shamshan Ghat

Item



Rate Amount



S.No.

:-:-



S.No. No L B H1

1 50 6 300.00 Sqm.

Total 300.002

240 X 6.0 = 240 Sqm.

3

2 40 x 6 x 0.15 = 72

Total 72 Cum.4

2 40 4 2 640 cum5

Total


Total 129.401 30% 38.822 60% 77.643 10% 12.94







Item

Execavation in DIR







Width of Apron =

contd..

Height of Toewall=

Thickness of Apron=

Quantity



6


Total 28.027


Total 86.89 Cum.8


Total 81.92 Cum.9


10


Total 6.17 Cum.11


12


Total = 153.7013

0 4 x 4 = 0.00










:-:-

Ac

10 12.0 10

H.W.Ext.H.W. 1

1.0c

S.W.0.6

B 3.5 B

APRON 2

1.0T.W. 0.3



Name of Village Bhilari

0.6

Name of Site

1.20


Near Shamshan Ghat

W.W .

W.W

PLAN2A

PLAN

1.3

1

1.2

1.3

0.152.2

1.50.3

SECTION ON A-A'

0.6

2.5

B.L.1

1.5



2.5

BED LEVEL







S.No.

Tractor trip

Total Amount

ITEM





Material Statement

:-:-

Quatity Unit

Labour Total

1Labour Amount

Total Amount

300.00 Cum. 1.00 1.00 300.00 300.00

2

300 Sqm. 1.36 1.36 408.00 408.003

90 Cum. 85.00 85.00 7650.00 7650.004

800.00 Cum. 37.00 37.00 29600.00 29600.005

131.40 Cum. 0.00 0.0039.42 Cum. 91.00 91.00 3587.22 3587.2278.84 Cum. 99.00 99.00 7805.16 7805.1613.14 Cum. 134.00 134.00 1760.76 1760.76

6

31.20 Cum. 318 1643 9921.60 51261.60

7

80.88 Cum. 342 1252 27660.96 101261.768

66.24 Cum. 342 1252 22654.08 82932.489

9.60 Cum. 342 1252 3283.20 12019.2010


139.80 Sqm. 65.7 138 9184.86 19292.4013

0.00 Cum. 100.5 195 0.00 0.00126343.04 339699.98

10191.00349890.98

1.262.243.50


Grand Total

Execavation in DIR















Item



Rate Amount



S.No.

:-:-



S.No. No L B H1

1 50 6 300.00 Sqm.

Total 300.002

250 X 6.0 = 300 Sqm.

3

2 50 x 6 x 0.15 = 90

Total 90 Cum.4

2 50 4 2 800 cum5

Total


Total 131.401 30% 39.422 60% 78.843 10% 13.14







Item

Execavation in DIR







Width of Apron =

contd..

Height of Toewall=

Thickness of Apron=

Quantity



6


Total 31.207


Total 80.88 Cum.8


Total 66.24 Cum.9


10


Total 8.10 Cum.11


12


Total = 139.8013

0 4 x 4 = 0.00










:-:-

Ac

5 16.0 5

H.W.Ext.H.W. 1.3

1.0c

S.W.0.6

B 4.0 B

APRON 2

1.0T.W. 0.3



Name of Village 0

0.6

Name of Site

1.20


Near Devnarayan Temple

W.W .

W.W

PLAN2A

PLAN

1.3

1.3

1

1.3

0.152.5

1.50.3

SECTION ON A-A'

0.6

2.3

B.L.1

1.5



2.3

BED LEVEL







S.No.

Tractor trip

Total Amount

ITEM





Material Statement

:-:-

Quatity Unit

Labour Total

1Labour Amount

Total Amount

300.00 Cum. 1.00 1.00 300.00 300.00

2

300 Sqm. 1.36 1.36 408.00 408.003

90 Cum. 85.00 85.00 7650.00 7650.004

800.00 Cum. 37.00 37.00 29600.00 29600.005

172.00 Cum. 0.00 0.0051.60 Cum. 91.00 91.00 4695.60 4695.60

103.20 Cum. 99.00 99.00 10216.80 10216.8017.20 Cum. 134.00 134.00 2304.80 2304.80

6

40.20 Cum. 318 1643 12783.60 66048.60

7

107.65 Cum. 342 1552 36816.30 167072.808

121.11 Cum. 342 1552 41419.62 187962.729

12.00 Cum. 342 1552 4104.00 18624.0010


193.70 Sqm. 65.7 138 12726.09 26730.6013

0.00 Cum. 100.5 195 0.00 0.00166135.45 548473.10

16454.19564927.29

1.663.995.65



Rate Amount



S.No.





TaswariyaNear Sitaram Meena Farm

Item







Grand Total

Execavation in DIR





:-:-



S.No. No L B H1

1 50 6 300.00 Sqm.

Total 300.002

250 X 6.0 = 300 Sqm.

3

2 50 x 6 x 0.15 = 90

Total 90 Cum.4

2 50 4 2 800 cum5

Total


Total 172.001 30% 51.602 60% 103.203 10% 17.20

contd..

Height of Toewall=

Thickness of Apron=

Quantity


Width of Apron =

Item


Execavation in DIR













6


Total 40.207


Total 107.65 Cum.8

H.W. 1 X 20.0 X 2 X 1.5 = 60.00 Cum.H.W.Ext 2 X 5.0 X 1.1 X 3.3 = 34.65 Cum.S.W. 2 X 4.5 X 0.8 X 2.55 = 18.36 Cum.W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 1.0 X 1.8 = 7.20 Cum.T.W. 1 X 20.0 X 0.30 X 0.15 = 0.90 Cum.

Total 121.11 Cum.9


10


Total 9.97 Cum.11


12


Total = 193.7013

0 4 x 4 = 0.00










:-:-

Ac

5 20.0 5

H.W.Ext.H.W. 1.3

1.0c

S.W.0.6

B 4.5 B

APRON 2

1.3T.W. 0.3

Name of Site

1.40


Near Sitaram Meena Farm



Name of Village Taswariya

0.6

W.W .

W.W

PLAN2A

PLAN

1.8

1.3

1.5

1.8

0.152.7

1.50.3

SECTION ON A-A'

0.6

3.3

B.L.1

1.5


BED LEVEL



3.3










Material Statement

S.No.

Tractor trip

Total Amount

ITEM

:-:-

Quatity Unit


1

300.00 Cum. 1.00 1.00 300.00 300.00

2

600 Sqm. 1.36 1.36 816.00 816.003

180 Cum. 85.00 85.00 15300.00 15300.004

1600.00 Cum. 37.00 37.00 59200.00 59200.005

165.85 Cum. 0.00 0.0049.76 Cum. 91.00 91.00 4527.71 4527.7199.51 Cum. 99.00 99.00 9851.49 9851.4916.59 Cum. 134.00 134.00 2222.39 2222.39

6

37.50 Cum. 318 1643 11925.00 61612.50

7

106.62 Cum. 342 1252 36462.33 133481.988

109.05 Cum. 342 1252 37295.10 136530.609

10.80 Cum. 342 1252 3693.60 13521.6010


189.60 Sqm. 65.7 138 12456.72 26164.8013

0.00 Cum. 100.5 195 0.00 0.00196864.58 487828.95

14634.87502463.81

1.973.065.02


Grand Total

Execavation in DIR










SubTotal






Item



Rate Amount



S.No.

:-:-



S.No. No L B H1

1 50 6 300.00 Sqm.

Total 300.002

2100 X 6.0 = 600 Sqm.

3

2 100 x 6 x 0.15 = 180

Total 180 Cum.4

2 100 4 2 1600 cum5

Total


Total 165.851 30% 49.762 60% 99.513 10% 16.59







Execavation in DIR







Width of Apron =

Item

contd..

Height of Toewall=

Thickness of Apron=

Quantity



6


Total 37.507


Total 106.62 Cum.8

H.W. 1 X 18.0 X 1.8 X 1.2 = 38.88 Cum.H.W.Ext 2 X 8.0 X 1 X 3.0 = 46.80 Cum.S.W. 2 X 4.0 X 0.8 X 2.40 = 15.36 Cum.W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 1.0 X 1.8 = 7.20 Cum.T.W. 1 X 18.0 X 0.30 X 0.15 = 0.81 Cum.

Total 109.05 Cum.9


10


Total 9.02 Cum.11


12


Total = 189.6013

0 4 x 4 = 0.00










:-:-

Ac

8 18.0 8

H.W.Ext.H.W. 1.2

1.0c

S.W.0.6

B 4.0 B

APRON 2

1.3T.W. 0.3

Taswariya

0.6

Near Devkaran Regar FarmName of Site

1.20




Name of Village

W.W .

W.W

PLAN2A

PLAN

1.8

1.2

1.2

1.8

0.152.4

1.50.3

SECTION ON A-A'

0.6

3

B.L.1

1.5



3

BED LEVEL







S.No.

Tractor trip

Total Amount

ITEM





Material Statement

:-:-

Quatity Unit

Labour Total

1Labour Amount

Total Amount

300.00 Cum. 1.00 1.00 300.00 300.00

2

180 Sqm. 1.36 1.36 244.80 244.803

54 Cum. 85.00 85.00 4590.00 4590.004

480.00 Cum. 37.00 37.00 17760.00 17760.005

135.60 Cum. 0.00 0.0040.68 Cum. 91.00 91.00 3701.88 3701.8881.36 Cum. 99.00 99.00 8054.64 8054.6413.56 Cum. 134.00 134.00 1817.04 1817.04

6

29.55 Cum. 318 1643 9396.90 48550.65

7

91.56 Cum. 342 1252 31313.52 114633.128

106.00 Cum. 342 1252 36252.00 132712.009

7.20 Cum. 342 1252 2462.40 9014.4010


162.60 Sqm. 65.7 138 10682.82 22438.8013

0.00 Cum. 100.5 195 0.00 0.00128538.48 380762.59

11422.88392185.47

1.292.643.92



Rate Amount



S.No.





0Near Magana Bheel Farm

Item







Grand Total

Execavation in DIR





:-:-



S.No. No L B H1

1 50 6 300.00 Sqm.

Total 300.002

230 X 6.0 = 180 Sqm.

3

2 30 x 6 x 0.15 = 54

Total 54 Cum.4

2 30 4 2 480 cum5

Total


Total 135.601 30% 40.682 60% 81.363 10% 13.56

contd..

Height of Toewall=

Thickness of Apron=

Quantity



Width of Apron =

Item

Execavation in DIR













6


Total 29.557


Total 91.56 Cum.8

H.W. 1 X 12.0 X 2 X 1.5 = 35.10 Cum.H.W.Ext 2 X 7.0 X 1 X 3.2 = 45.92 Cum.S.W. 2 X 4.5 X 0.8 X 2.45 = 17.64 Cum.W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 1.0 X 1.7 = 6.80 Cum.T.W. 1 X 12.0 X 0.30 X 0.15 = 0.54 Cum.

Total 106.00 Cum.9


10


Total 6.29 Cum.11


12


Total = 162.6013

0 4 x 4 = 0.00










:-:-

Ac

7 12.0 7

H.W.Ext.H.W. 1.2

1.0c

S.W.0.6

B 4.5 B

APRON 2

1.2T.W. 0.3

Near Magana Bheel Farm0

0.6

Name of Site

1.50




Name of Village

W.W .

W.W

PLAN2A

PLAN

1.7

1.2

1.5

1.7

0.152.7

1.50.3

SECTION ON A-A'

0.6

3.2

B.L.1

1.5



3.2

BED LEVEL











Material Statement

S.No.

Tractor trip

Total Amount

ITEM

Top Width - 0.6 m Bottom Width- 4.6 m Height - 1 m2.602.00


1

Dug belling work up to 5-7 cm depth (rate as per BSR-2011, P.no. 14, item no. 156)

Rm 13.2 1 1 13.2 13.20

2

Excavation of head wall (2.0*4.6*0.15) (rate as per BSR-2011, P.no. 17, item no. 189 b)

Cum 1.38 91.00 91 125.58 125.58

3

Excavation for Extension wall at both bank (1.0*1.0*0.15) *2 (rate as per BSR-2011, P.no. 17, item no. 189 b)

cum 0.30 91.00 91 27.3 27.30

4

RR Dry stone Masonry in foundation (rate as per BSR-2011, P.no. 3, item no. 24 b)

Cum 1.68 273.00 706 458.64 1186.08

5

RR Dry stone Masonry in supper structure(Head wall+Ext.wall) (rate as per BSR-2011, P.no. 3, item no. 24 b)

Cum 5.8 273.00 706 1583.4 4094.80

2208.12 5446.96

163.415610.37

5600.00

0.6 m

U/S 1:1 D/S 1:31 m

4.6 mSide view

Unit Quantity

Cross sectional area- sqmAverage length of LBCD- mt

S.no


MODEL ESTIMATE OF LBCD (a) 1mtTehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State - Rajasthan, India

Integrated Watershed Management Programme, JahazpurA-160,Subhash Nagar,Bhilwara,Rajasthan 311001

RateItem

Amount

Say Amt

Contingency 3%Total

Name of Village :- 0

6.0

2

Side Wall

Apron

Plan view of Gabian Structure

1

Key Wall Apron

Side Wall Main Wall

Logitudinal section of gabian

Notes :- All Dimension Are in Metres

1

0.6

0.6

2.0 2.0

Cross section of main wall Cross section of side wall

1.0

6.0

12.0

Integrated Watershed Management ProgrammeTehsil - Jahazpur, District - Bhilwara, State - Rajasthan, India

Detail Drwing of Gabion Structure

Main Wall

Name of Village :- Name of site :-

Type of structure :- GPS position Latitude

LongitudeElevation Above MSL

S.no Particulars Measerment unit1 Length of Head Wall 6.0 metres2 Height of Head Wall 1.0 metres3 Top Width of Head Wall 1.0 metres4 Bottom Width of Head Wall 1.0 metres5 Width of Apron 2.0 metres6 Thicknes of Apron 0.6 metres7 Length of Side Wall 2.0 metres8 Height of Side Wall 1.0 metres9 Excavation Depth o side wall 1.010 Thicknes of Side Wall 1.0 metres11 Length of Key Wall 3.0 metres12 Excavation Depth of Key wall 2.013 Height of Key Wall 2.014 Total Length of Structure 12.0 metres15 Steps (V:H) 1 :1

S.no Particular No. Length Width H/D/T Quantity Unit Rate Amount1 Excavation

As per BSR 2011,page no-1 Item no-2(B),page no-17 Item no-189 ©1.1 Side Wall 2 2.0 1.0 1.0 41.2 Below head wall and for Apron in H.S. 1 8.0 3.0 0.6 14.41.3 For Key in H.S. 2 3.0 1.0 2.00 12.0

Total Excavation 30.4 Cum.Hard soil 18.2 91.0 1659.84Mouram 12.2 99.0 1203.84

Total Excavation 2 Construction A As per BSR 2011 page no- 3 ,item no-24b

2.1 Head Wall 1 6.0 1 1.0 6.02.2 Below head wall and for Apron in H.S. 1 8.0 3.0 0.6 14.42.3 Key Wall 2 3.0 1.0 2.00 12.02.4 Side Wall 2 2.0 1 1 4.0

Quantity of boulder 36.4 Labour 273.0 99373 Wire mesh Material 433.0 15761.2B As per BSR 2011 page no- 18 ,item no-202(a)

2.1 Head Wall 25.02.2 Apron &Head wall foundation 61.22.3 Key Wall 80.02.4 Side Wall 16.0

Quantity of G.I. Wire mesh 182.2 Labour 15.5 2824Material 90.0 16398Total Cost 47784

Contingencies @ 3.0% 1433.53Grand Total 49217.71

Costing Estimation Say Rs. 49200.00

Foundation for Ecological SecurityIntegrated Watershed Management Programme

Tehsil - Jahazpur, District - Bhilwara, State - Rajasthan, India

Diamention for Construction & Costing of Gabian Structure

Quantity & Cost Estimetion of Gabian Structure

G.P.: Panchayat Samiti :-- Jahajpur District:-- BHILWARA

Labour Total Labour TotalExcavatoin in foundation & disposal of excavatedmaterial within initial lead of 30 m and lift of 1.5 mincluding drssing etc. complete. (As per itemno.2(d) of page-1& Item .189(b&c) Page.17 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR)HSMB (20%) cum 5.08 91.00 91.00 462.28 462.28Ordinary murram (50%) Cum 12.70 99.00 99.00 1257.30 1257.30Soft rock (30%) Cum 7.62 134.00 134.00 1021.08 1021.08

2 Cement concrete well mixed in cement mortar(1:4:8 ) laid in position complete including curing.Aggregate size up to 50 mm. HB (As per itemno.191 page.17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR)

Cum 7.62 318.00 1643.00 2423.16 12519.66

3 Random rubble stone manonary in cement sandmortor (1:6) for foundation(As per item no.27(a)Page.3 of G.K.N.2011 BSR)

Cum 17.78 402.00 1313.00 7147.56 23345.14

4 Random rubble stone manonary in cement sandmortor (1:6) for super structure (As per itemno.27(a) page 3 of G.K.N.2011 BSR)

Cum 15.13 402.00 1313.00 6081.46 19863.06

5 Cement plaster including smooth finishing incement mortar ( 1:4 ) 25 mm thick (As per itemno.70(a) page no.8 of G.K.N.2011 BSR)

Sq.m. 25.31 65.70 138.00 1663.07 3493.21

6 Cement conerete coping in cement mortar ( 1:2:4)75 mm thick (As per item no.40(a) page.4 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR)

Cum 1.15 410.00 2913.00 471.92 3352.92

7 Rehandling of excavated soil from foundations ortrenches upto 1.5m.lift & 50 m. lead includingplaining of soil ( As per item no.5 page 1 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)

Cum 25.40 37.00 37.00 939.80 939.80

8 Benching of Base and depositing the excavatedmaterial including dressing etc. complete within inan initial lead of 50m & lift of 1.5 m (as per BSR2011 Item No.200(a) Page. No.17

Cum 270.00 67.00 67 18090.00 18090.00

9 E/W for bund / Excavation in dry or moist soilincluding laying in layer's of 15cm Breaking ofclods, sorting of grass pabbles etc. and dressing inrequired profile when compacted manually or byplain roller with initial lead of 30 M and lift of 1.5 M(excluding charges of watering and compaction inH.S.( As per item no.188(b) page 17 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)

Cum 1080.00 85.00 85 91800.00 91800.00

in O.M. Cum 1080.00 99.00 99 106920.00 106920.0010 Compaction of E/W manually or by plain roller

excluding watering charges (item No. 199(a) Pageno.17)

Cum 2160.00 14.20 14.2 30672.00 30672.00

11 Watering of earth, murrum highly weatheredmaterial or similar material to optimum moisture inborrow area when source of water being 1 K.m.(As per item no. page of G.K.N.2011 BSR)

Cum 2160.00 3.05 3.05 6588.00 6588.00

12 Dry stone pitching hammer dressed with packingof voids from smaal stones including all lifts inrequired profile of depth of 20 to 23 c.m.( As peritem no.195 page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR ofBhilwara circle)

Cum 82.80 166.50 598 13786.20 49514.40

Sub Total 289323.83 369838.8611095.17

380934.02380900.00

28932491576

380900

Rate Amount (Rs)

ABSTRACT OF COST

1

S. No.

Particular Qty.

Name of Work:-- Construction of NADI WITH SIDE WAISTE WEIR

Unit

Add for contingent exp 3%

LabourMaterial

Total

Grand totalSay Rs.

S.No. Particular No. Length Breadth Ht./Depth Quantity

1 2 3 4 5 6 71 Excavatoin in foundation & disposal of

excavated material within initial lead of 30m and lift of 1.5 m including drssing etc.complete. H.W. 1 10.00 1.00 1.00 10.00H.W.E. 1 2.40 1.00 1.00 2.40S.W. 1 9.00 1.00 1.00 9.00Wing Wall 2 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00Total 25.40HSMB (20%) 5.08Ordinary murram (50%) 12.70Soft rock (30%) 7.62

2 Cenemt concrete well mixed in cementmortar ( 1 :4 :8) laid in position completeincluding curing. Aggregate size up to50mm HBH.W. 1 10.00 1.00 0.30 3.00H.W.E. 1 2.40 1.00 0.30 0.72S.W. 1 9.00 1.00 0.30 2.70Wing Wall 2 2.00 1.00 0.30 1.20Total (Cu.m.) 7.62

3 Random rubble stone masonary in cementsand mortar (1 : 6) for foundation

H.W. 1 10.00 1.00 0.70 7.00H.W.E. 1 2.40 1.00 0.70 1.68S.W. 1 9.00 1.00 0.70 6.30Wing Wall 2 2.00 1.00 0.70 2.80Total (Cu.m.) 17.78

4 Random rubble stone masonary in cementsand mortar (1 : 6) for superstructure


5 Cement plaster including smooth finishingin cement mortar (1:4) 20mm thick

H.W. 1 10.00 1.14 11.40H.W.E. 1 2.40 1.40 3.36S.W. 1 9.00 0.95 8.55Wing Wall 2 2.00 0.50 2.00Total (Cu.m.) 25.31

6 Cement concrete coping in cement mortar(1:2:4) 75mm thick


DETAIL ESTIMATE OF SIDE WASTE WEIR



S.No. Particular No. Length Breadth Ht./Depth Quantity

1 2 3 4 5 6 77 Rehandling of excavated soil from

foundations or trenches upto 1.5m.lift & 50m. lead including plaining of soil

25.40

8 Benching of Base and depositing theexcavated material including dressing etc.complete within in an initial lead of 50m &lift of 1.5 mTotal (Cu.m.) 1 180.00 10.00 0.15 270.00

9 E/W for bund / Excavation in dry or moistsoil including laying in layer's of 15cmBreaking of clods, sorting of grass pabblesetc. and dressing in required profile whencompacted manually or by plain roller withinitial lead of 30 M and lift of 1.5 M(excluding charges of watering andcompaction )in H.S. 0.5 180.00 6.00 2.00 1080.00in O.M. 0.5 180.00 6.00 2.00 1080.00Total (Cu.m.) 2160.00

10 Compaction of E/W manually or by plainroller excluding watering chargesTotal (Cu.m.) 2160.00

11 Watering of earth, murrum highlyweathered material or similar material tooptimum moisture in borrow area whensource of water being 1 K.m.Total (Cu.m.) 2160.00

12 Dry stone pitching hammer dressed withpacking of voids from smaal stonesincluding all lifts in required profile of depthof 20 to 23 c.m.Total (Cu.m.) 1 180.00 2.00 0.23 82.80


2.40

10.00

HWE 0.601.00

S/W9.00

W/W

0.60 2.00

Not to the scale


HEAD WALL

(All dimensions in m.)PLAN

S.No. Particulars Qty. Cement (Bags)

Sand (Cum.)

Stone (Cum.)

50 mm 20 mm1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 Cement concrete (1:4:8)Aggregate size up to 50mm (cum)

7.62 24.38 3.43 6.86

2 RR Stone masonary in CM (1:6)for foundation & Superstructure(cum)

32.91 46.07 9.87 36.20

3 Cement Plaster (1:4) 25mm thick(Sq.m.)

25.31 5.67 0.81

4 Dry Stone pitching (cum) 82.80 91.08

5 Cement concrete coping (1:2:4)75mm thick (cum.)

1.15 6.72 0.47 0.94

Total 82.85 14.58 6.86 0.94 127.28

Say= 4.14 M.T.

MATERIAL CONSUMPTION STATEMENT

Aggregate (Cum)

Name of Work:-- Construction of NADI WITH SIDE WAISTE WEIR G.P.: Panchayat Samiti :-- Jahajpur District:-- BHILWARA

S. No Details of Activity Quantity Rates Cost per Beneficiaries Total Amt (Rs) Remark1 Inaugration 1 5000.00 167 5000.002 Boarding Charges 1 120000.00 4000 120000.003 Salary of Faculty 1 17000.00 567 17000.004 Guest faculty honarorium 1 30000.00 1000 30000.005 Stationary and Reading Material 1 20000.00 667 20000.006 Raw Material 1 50000.00 1667 50000.007 Field Visit 1 15000.00 500 15000.008 Monitoring 1 10000.00 333 10000.009 Misc 1 5000.00 167 5000.00

TOTAL 9067 272000.00


Integrated Watershed Management Programme, JahazpurDetailed Estimate of skill upgradation in Domestic electricity and based appliances repairing Unit cost for 30 beneficiry

S. No Details of Activity Quantity Rates Cost per Beneficiaries Total Amt (Rs) Remark1 Inaugration 1 5000.00 167 5000.002 Boarding Charges 1 75000.00 2500 75000.003 Salary of Faculty 1 15000.00 500 15000.004 Guest faculty honarorium 1 15000.00 500 15000.005 Stationary and Reading Material 1 15000.00 500 15000.006 Raw Material 1 35000.00 1167 35000.007 Field Visit 1 15000.00 500 15000.008 Monitoring 1 10000.00 333 10000.009 Misc 1 5000.00 167 5000.00

TOTAL 6333 190000.00


Integrated Watershed Management Programme, JahazpurDetailed Estimate of skill upgradation on stiching Unit cost for 30 beneficiry

S. No Details of Activity Quantity Rates Total Amt (Rs) Remark

1 Cow rearing (Gir) 1 30000.00 30000.00 As per Dairy model 2 Insurance cost 1 1000.00 1000.003 Transportaion 1 1500.00 1500.00

TOTAL 32500.00

Detailed Estimate of Cow rearing of livestock management & dairying Unit cost per beneficiry



S. No Details of Activity Quantity Rates Total Amt (Rs) Remarks

1 Goat rearing (Sirohi Breed) with insurance 1 5150.00 5150.00

2 Transportation 1 200.00 200.00

3 Life saving medicines/minerals/ insurance etc. 1 1000.00 1000.00 Insurance for 3-4 yrs

TOTAL 6350.00

S. No Details of Activity Quantity Rates Total Amt (Rs) Remarks

1 Service Buck 1 10000.00 10000.00 One service buck is sufficient for 20 goats hence cost of service buck is 10000.00

2 Life saving medicines/minerals/ insurance etc.

1 1000.00 1000.00 Insurance for 3-4 yrs

TOTAL 11000.00

Integrated Watershed Management Programme, JahazpurDetailed Estimate of Goat (Sirohi breed) rearing as part of livestock management & dairying Unit cost per beneficiry

Detailed Estimate of Goat (Sirohi breed) rearing as part of livestock management & dairying Unit cost per beneficiry




S. No Items Units Rates Total Amt (Rs) Remark

1 Fodder seed intervention 1 1000.00 1000.00 Including new seed and local fodder best practices

2 Urea treatment 1 500.00 500.003 Urea molases/ Bricks 1 500.00 500.00 Common salt use in each dose4 Miscellanous expences 1 500.00 500.00

TOTAL 2500.00

Detailed Estimate of Fodder Management



S. No Activity Per conception Rates Total Amt (Rs) Remark

1 Cattle Breeding by A.I. 1 150.00 150.00

TOTAL 150.00

Detailed Estimate of Dairying (Breed Improvement)



S. No ActivityPer

conception

Rates Total Amt (Rs) Remark

1 Cattle Breeding by Natural Service in Buffalo 1 30000.00 30000.00

TOTAL 30000.00


Integrated Watershed Management Programme, JahazpurDetailed Estimate of Dairying (Breed Improvement)

S. No ActivityPer

conception

Rates Total Amt (Rs) Remark

1 Cattle Breeding by Natural Service in Cow 1 25000.00 25000.00

TOTAL 25000.00


Integrated Watershed Management Programme, JahazpurDetailed Estimate of Dairying (Breed Improvement)

S. No Items Unit Rate Total Amt (Rs) Remark

1 Bricks 1200 2.75 3300.00 For dome construction2 Cement Bags 16 225.00 3600.00 Prefer red oxide cement

3 Stone Slabs 2 400.00 800.00 For cover the outlet inlet tanks

4 Corse sand (Bajri) trolly 1 1200.00 1200.00 Fine sand required for construct dome

5 Gravels trolly 0.5 2000.00 1000.006 Chulha/ Assessories 1 2400.00 2400.007 Pit digging cost 1 600.00 600.008 Labour cost 15 200.00 3000.009 Mason 7 400.00 2800.00

10 Miscellanous exp 1 1300.00 1300.0011 Biogas lamp 1 500.00 500.00

TOTAL 20500.00

Detailed Estimate of Biogas plant 3 Cmt Sized




1 Pressure cooker of 3 lit cap 1 1725.00 1725.00 15 % hike with actual market cost

TOTAL 1725.00

Detailed Estimate of Pressure cooker 3 ltrs item



S. No Items Unit Rate Total Amt (Rs) Reference

1 Urja lantern with mobile charger including installation 1 1800.00 1800.00 Urja unlimited, a social enterprises

TOTAL 1800.00

Detailed Estimate of Energy Efficient Light



S. No Particulars Per training Rate Total Amt

(Rs) Remark

1 Transportation 1 3500.00 3500.002 Logistics and food 1 2000.00 2000.003 Livestock Literatures 1 1500.00 1500.004 Resource person 1 1000.00 1000.00

TOTAL 8000.00


Integrated Watershed Management Programme, JahazpurDetailed Estimate of Paraworker (Jankar) for Animal Husbandry one person from each village


(Rs) Remark

1 Transportation 2 3500.00 7000.002 Logistics and food 2 2000.00 4000.00

3 Soil water conservation Literatures 2 1500.00 3000.00

4 Resource person 2 1000.00 2000.00TOTAL 16000.00


Integrated Watershed Management Programme, JahazpurDetailed Estimate of Paraworker (Jankar) for Soil Water Conservation one person from each

village


(Rs) Remark

1 Transportation 1 3500.00 3500.002 Logistics and food 1 2000.00 2000.00

3 Accounts in relation to village institution 1 1500.00 1500.00

4 Resource person 1 1000.00 1000.00TOTAL 8000.00


Integrated Watershed Management Programme, JahazpurDetailed Estimate of Paraworker (Jankar) for Accounts one person from each village

S. No Particulars Per training Rate Total Amt (Rs) Remark

1 Transportation 1 3500.00 3500.00

2 Logistics and food 1 2000.00 2000.00

3 Agriculture Literatures 1 1500.00 1500.00

4 Resource person 1 1000.00 1000.00

TOTAL 8000.00

Detailed Estimate of Paraworker (Jankar) for Agriculture one person from each village




(Rs) Remark

1 Transportation 1 3500.00 3500.002 Logistics and food 1 2000.00 2000.003 Energy conservation Literatures 1 1500.00 1500.004 Resource person 1 1000.00 1000.00

TOTAL 8000.00


Integrated Watershed Management Programme, JahazpurDetailed Estimate of Paraworker (Jankar) for Energy Conservation one person from each village

S. No Activity Types Unit Rate Quantity Amount Rs Contribution Details

1 Soil testing Sampling No 25.00 1 25.002 Seed Kg 20.00 5 100.003 DAP Kg 10.00 12.8 0.00 128.004 Urea Kg 5.00 20 0.00 100.005 Neem cake Kg 14.00 40 560.006 Trichoderma Kg 128.00 1 128.007 Neem oil Lit 90.00 0.8 72.008 BD-Compost Broadcast 700.00 1 700.009 Azetobactor Pcts 7.00 1 7.00

10 PSB Pcts 8.00 1 8.00

TOTAL 1600.00 228.00

Per 0.16 hect CostDetailed Estimate of Production system in Agriculture IPNM Demo

Soil test report compare before and

after.



Name of crop: Maize Variety: Navjot, Aravali

S. No Activity Types Unit Rate Quantity Amount Rs Contribution Details

1 Soil testing Sampling No 25.00 1 25.002 Seed Kg 22.00 20 440.003 DAP Kg 10.00 12.8 0.00 128.004 Urea Kg 5.00 20 0.00 100.005 Neem cake Kg 14.00 40 560.006 Trichoderma Kg 128.00 1 128.007 Neem oil Lit 90.00 0.8 72.008 BD-Compost Broadcast 800.00 1 800.009 Azetobactor Pcts 7.00 1 7.00

10 PSB Pcts 8.00 1 8.00TOTAL 2040.00 228.00

Soil test report compare before and

after.

Name of crop: Wheat Variety Lok-1, Raj-3077 , WH-147 Per 0.16 hect Cost


Integrated Watershed Management Programme, JahazpurDetailed Estimate of Production system in Agriculture Crop Demo

S. No Activity Types Unit Rate Quantity Amount Rs Reference

1 Soil testing Sampling No 25.00 1 25.00 Expert DFRS Bhilwara

2 Plant materials specing 90 cm x 90 cm cuttings No 1.50 14845 22267.50 Expert DFRS

Bhilwara

3 Cost of cultivation Machine/ Mannual Hect 14300.00 1 14300.00 Expert DFRS

Bhilwara

TOTAL 14846.00 36592.50

Per Hectare CostName of fodder crop: Napier grass


Integrated Watershed Management Programme, JahazpurDetailed Estimate of Fodder Demo

S. No Activity Unit Rate Quantity Amount Rs 1 Cost of Seeds Quantals 1500.00 40 60000.00

2 Transportation cost and loading unloading

Per Trip 1500.00 2 3000.00

3 Training expences for trainer and trainee

No 2000.00 1 2000.00

4 Storage, weight and scales set 6000.00 1 6000.005 Maintenance 3000.00 1 3000.00

6 System management and village institution

Meetings 2000.00 1 2000.00

TOTAL 76000.00


Integrated Watershed Management Programme, JahazpurDetailed Estimate of Seed Bank per village cover 40 families

S. No Activity Unit Rate Quantity Amount Rs

1 Cost of food grains Quantals 1376.00 40 55040.00

2 Transportation cost with loading unloading

PerTrip 1500.00 2 3000.00

3 Training No 1400.00 1 1400.004 Storage, weighting cost set 6000.00 1 6000.005 Maintenance 3000.00 1 3000.00

6 System management and building institutions

Meetings 2000.00 1 2000.00

TOTAL 70440.00


Integrated Watershed Management Programme, JahazpurDetailed Estimate of Grain Bank per village cover 40 families


1 B.D.Innoculants 502 to 507 1 100.00 100.00

2 Slacked lime in Kg 5 25.00 125.00

3 Labour 8 150.00 1200.00

TOTAL 1425.00

Detailed Estimate of B.D. Composting




1 Compost Pit 1 1000.00 1000.00

TOTAL 1000.00

Detailed Estimate of Pit Composting



s. no. Componends of integreted farming system Area ha./Units AmountBunding with cenchrus / grass 400 R.M. 9500Crop (Groundnut + sesame (6.2))/maize + black grem (2.2) / sorghum + green gram (2.1) 1000 Sqm. 25000Grassland (cenchrus + stylo) with contour bunds at 8 m interval 400 R.M. 9180Kitchen gardan with drip system 600 Plants 15000Livestock (improved health, feeding and shelter management like vaccination , deworming, dehorning, feeding managers etc) 1000 Plants 20000Multi-purpose tree with improved trench system (Desi babool +Custard apple + karonda + ber) 0.5 ha. 35000Jalkunda/ farmpond/ 0.75 ha. 1200On- farm inpute production compost and - pesticidal crop management (NADEP/bio-dynamic manure/ vermiwash/ bio-pesticide) 0.125 ha. 4000Intercroping Of Maize & Blackgram 0.375 5000

A- 3 Deshi Maize 0.125 ha. 1000Vermi Compost with plastic Bad 1 Unit 4000Farm Pond With Plastice Sheet 6 Lack Liter 50000Total Cost 169380Contigency 3% 5081Grand Total 174461

A -1

A- 2


Integrated Watershed Management Programme, JahazpurDetailed Estimate of Integrated Farm Model

S. No Items Units Rates Quantity Total Amt (Rs) Remark1 Supply of Anar saplings No 20.00 52 1040.002 Soil test 25.00 1 25.003 Transportation of plants 2.00 52 104.004 Loading unloading 52 11.005 Rehandling of plants 1.00 52 52.006 Layout of pit diggings 52 19.007 Pit digging 1m*1m*1m 57.00 52 2964.00

8 Neem cake application 4 kg per plant

Kg 56.00 52 2912.00 4 kg @ 14 Rs

9 Gypsum application 2 kg per plant

Kg 2.00 52 104.00 2 kg @ 1 Rs per kg

10 Trichoderma 100 gm per plant

gm 13.00 52 676.00 100 gm per plant @ 130 per kg

11 BD Compost 2 kg Kg 3.00 52 156.0012 Pit filling and plantation No 4.00 52 208.00

13 Drip irrigation No 20000.00 1 20000.00Cost of drip irrigation

considered on per Hectare.

14 Thawla making No 1.00 52 68.00

15 Vermicompost application 4 kg per plant

Kg 16.00 52 832.00 4 kg @ 4 Rs

16 Contigency 5% 395.00TOTAL 29566.00

Detailed Estimate of Horticulture Plantation per 0.16 Hect area



Sl.No Activity Unit Rate Qt Amount Remark1 Ladies finger seed Gram 100 0.250 252 Brinjal seed Gram 100 0.250 253 Tomato Gram 100 0.250 254 Chilly Gram 200 0.100 205 Cucurbits Gram 100 0.230 236 PSB Packet 15 4 607 Azatobacter Packet 7 4 288 BD-500 Gram 232 2 4649 Vermicompost Kg 5 340 1700

10 Tricoderma Kg 128 5 640

11 Gravity based irrigation

No 1600 1 1600

Total 461011 Contingency 3 % 138.3

Grand Total 4748


Integrated Watershed Management Programme, JahazpurDetail Estimate of Kitchen Garden 100 Sqm

S. No Type Unit Rates Quantity Total Amount Rs Remark

1 Pipeline (HDPC) for pipe line irrigation

mtrs 60.00 200 12000.00

Total 60.00 12000.00

Detailed Estimate of Pipe gravity irrigation .



S. No Details of Activity Quantity Rates Total Amt (Rs) RemarkA No. of Training 3 8000.00a Transportation 1 3500.00b Stationaries 1 1500.00c Food and Logistic 1 2000.00d Resource Person 1 1000.00

B Seed Capital 1 16000.00 16000.00C Working Capital 1 10000.00 10000.00

TOTAL 50000.00


Integrated Watershed Management Programme, JahazpurDetailed Estimate of Provision of Agri services/business by federations/ institutions/SHGs Unit cost for 30 beneficiry

24000.00

S. No Items Unit Rates Total Amt (Rs) Remark1 Bricks 2000 3.00 6000.002 Cement 5 270.00 1350.003 Sand 1 800.00 800.004 Sheet for Shade 8 500.00 4000.005 Construction cost 1 3000.00 3000.006 Earth worm 5 200.00 1000.007 Seperation Sieve 1 1000.00 1000.008 Agro tools 1 1000.00 1000.009 Gunny bags 15 30.00 450.00

10 Exposure visit 1 10000.00 10000.0011 Miscellenous Expenses 1 1000.00 1000.00

TOTAL 28600.00


Integrated Watershed Management Programme, JahazpurDetailed Estimate of Non farm small enterprises based on assetless person (Vermicompost)

Unit per beneficiries

S. No Items No of activity Rates Total Amt (Rs) Remark

1 Electric multipurpose thresher governed by users group

1 20000.00 20000.00 Subsidy 50% avaibalble

TOTAL 20000.00


Integrated Watershed Management Programme, JahazpurDetailed Estimate of Agriculture based microenterprises

S. No Items No of activity Rates Total Amt (Rs) Remark

1 Chaff cutter governed by users group 1 10000.00 10000.00

If beneficiary dairy member, the subsidy might available 50% and cost of chaff

cutter reduced up to 5000.00TOTAL 10000.00


Integrated Watershed Management Programme, JahazpurDetailed Estimate of Animal based microenterprises(Livestock and Dairy)

S. No Details of Activity Quantity Rates Cost per Beneficiaries Total Amt (Rs) Remark

1 Inaugration 1 5000.00 167 5000.002 Boarding Charges 1 120000.00 4000 120000.003 Salary of Faculty 1 17000.00 567 17000.004 Guest faculty honarorium 1 30000.00 1000 30000.005 Stationary and Reading Material 1 20000.00 667 20000.006 Raw Material 1 50000.00 1667 50000.007 Field Visit 1 15000.00 500 15000.008 Monitoring 1 10000.00 333 10000.009 Misc 1 5000.00 167 5000.00

TOTAL 9067 272000.00


Integrated Watershed Management Programme, JahazpurDetailed Estimate of skill upgradation in mobile repairing Unit cost for 30 beneficiry

S. No Details of Activity Quantity Rates Cost per Beneficiaries Total Amt (Rs) Remark

1 Inaugration 1 5000.00 167 5000.002 Boarding Charges 1 120000.00 4000 120000.003 Salary of Faculty 1 17000.00 567 17000.004 Guest faculty honarorium 1 30000.00 1000 30000.005 Stationary and Reading Material 1 20000.00 667 20000.006 Raw Material 1 50000.00 1667 50000.007 Field Visit 1 15000.00 500 15000.008 Monitoring 1 10000.00 333 10000.009 Misc 1 5000.00 167 5000.00

TOTAL 9067 272000.00


Integrated Watershed Management Programme, JahazpurDetailed Estimate of skill upgradation in Kasidakari Unit cost for 30 beneficiry

S. No Items Unit Rates Total Amt (Rs) Reference Remark1 Aatta chakki 1 10000.00 10000.002 Motor 1 5000.00 5000.003 Transportation 1 2000.00 2000.004 Electric connection 1 5000.00 5000.005 Foundation 1 3000.00 3000.006 Exposure and Technical training 1 3000.00 3000.007 Working Capital 1 50.00 50.008 Miscellenous 1 2000.00 2000.00

TOTAL 30050.00


Integrated Watershed Management Programme, JahazpurDetailed Estimate of Non farm small enterprises based on assetless person ( Flour mill ) Unit per beneficiries

detailed project report - rajasthanwater.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...6.5 entry...

Documents