design of knee prosthesis and analysis-ashish sharma
DESCRIPTION
Designed Knee implant by using designing tool Pro-Engineer 5.0 and performed mechanical analysis by using an application PRO-MECHANICATRANSCRIPT
DESIGN OF KNEE PROSTHESIS
Ashish Sharma
Common Causes of Knee Pain and Loss of
Knee Function
ARTHRITIS
• Osteoarthritis (wear and tear)
• Rheumatoid arthritis
Post-traumatic arthritis caused by:
• Fractures
• Ligament injuries
• Meniscus tears
Knee Prosthesis comprised of
• Femoral- replaces arthritic
portion of thigh bone
• Tibial- replaces arthritic portion
of shin bone
• Tibial insert- replaces cartilage
and acts as shock absorber
• Patella- replaces knee cap
Types of Knee Prosthesis
• Fixed Knee Prosthesis : The more traditional fixed
bearing implant which can only flex and extend
• Mobile-Bearing Prosthesis: More advanced the rotating
platform knee implants move almost like a normal knee
joint. They allow the knee to twist and turn (rotation) as
well as flex and extend. The Rotating Platform Knee is
designed to bend and rotate, move back and forth, flex
and extend, helping to accommodate more normal
movement.
Design Input
Distal Portion of FemurKNEE REPLACEMENT SYSTEM by
Amplitude
Design Dimensions
Features
• PEGS
• PATELLAR FLANGE
• GROOVES ON CONDYLES
• INTERNAL SUPPORT
METHOD
Sketch Rectangle (Right Plane) Anterior plane
Box cut
SWEEP CUT
• Trajectory Cut sweep dialog box Section
Removal of extra material
Top View of Extrude-Cut Posterior Biew
Patellar flange
New Right Datum Plane Sketch Extrude
Intercondular notch
• Sketch Top view Extrude cut Final cut
PEGS
Sketch(Right plane) Revolve Final Peg
Longitudnal ridges on the condular posterior surface
• Sketch from the front view Final ridges
Longitudnal Ridges in Pegs
Sketch Axis Pattern Final Ridge
Ridges increase the holding power with bone cement
CUT TOOL
Family table
Rounds
• Features
1. Variable radii
2. Stress prone edges moved before Sweep cut
Component operation
Tool Cut/ Bone Cuts
Finite Element Analysis (FEA)
• Test I : Yield tensile strength test
• Test II: Fatigue strength test
• Loads were applied on lateral condyle to checkout the
strenght in extreme situation
Material Used
• Co-Cr-Mo
• Material properties
Properties Values
Tensile strength 855 MPa
Yield Strength 650 MPa
Fatigue Strength 510 MPa
Young’s Modulus 230 GPa
Density 8.3 g/Cm^3
Constraints
• One end is fixed- Displacement constraint
• Other end force given on lateral condyle- Force constraint
Results
• Max Stress without rounds
• Max Stress without round
conclusion
On rounding the internal edges there is a reduction in stress and
it is uniformly distributed
Final Assembly
REFRENCES
http://www.amplitude-ortho.com
http://orthoinfo.aaos.org/topic.cfm?topic=a00389
http://www.ofc-oregon.com
http://www.endotec.com
THANK YOU