design for social sustainability. - radarradar.gsa.ac.uk/5293/1/id1333_ead12-environment_ calvo de...

DesignforNext

12thEADConferenceSapienzaUniversityofRome

12-14April2017

Copyright©2016.Thecopyrightofeachpaperinthisconferenceproceedingsisthepropertyoftheauthor(s).Permissionisgrantedtoreproducecopiesoftheseworksforpurposesrelevanttotheaboveconference,providedthattheauthor(s),sourceandcopyrightnoticeareincludedoneachcopy.Forotherusespleasecontacttheauthor(s).

Designforsocialsustainability.Areflectionontheroleofthephysicalrealminfacilitatingcommunityco-design. MirianCalvoa,AnnalindaDeRosabaInstituteofDesignInnovation,TheGlasgowSchoolofArt,UKbDepartmentofDesign,PolitecnicodiMilano,Italy*Correspondingauthore-mail:[email protected]

Abstract: Understanding the environmental conditions that shape the physicalsupport for developing social sustainability requires analysing the symbioticrelationshipofpeopleandplace.Placeisconsideredanessentialaspectinshapingsocialidentity,identificationandcohesion.Thus,thispaperexplorestheroleofthephysical realm in enabling co-design practices within community initiatives. Itoutlines two PhD research projects focused on strengthening communityengagement using co-design approaches. It evidences its findings analysing twodifferent settings. Firstly, a PhD research project exploring themutual influencesbetweenspatialandservicedesignalsothroughthe investigationofpublicspacesasplatformsforstrategicinterventionswithexperimentationsintheurbanfabricofMilan (Italy). Secondly, a doctoral research exploring the value of community co-design on rural areas in the Highlands and Islands (Scotland) associated withLeapfrog,athree-year-fundedprojectbytheArtsandHumanitiesResearchCouncil(AHRC). Conducted by two different research teams, we analyse to what extentparticipatoryprocessescanstrengthencommunitiesandtheiridentities,aswellasreflectingonplace-basedapproachesfordesignstrategiesofterritories.

Keywords:designforsocialinnovation,socialsustainability,co-design,designactivism,designethnography.

1.ContextofresearchTheaimofthispaperistodiscusstheroleofthephysicalrealminsupportingco-designpracticesandshapingsocialidentity,identificationandcohesionfromadesignresearchperspective.ItoutlinestwoPhDresearchprojectsfocusedonstrengtheningcommunityengagementusingco-designapproaches.Itevidencesitsfindingsanalysingtwodifferentsettings:firstly,aPhDresearchproject

MIRIANCALVO,ANNALINDADEROSA

2

exploringthemutualinfluencesbetweenspatialandservicedesignalsothroughtheinvestigationofpublicspacesasplatformsforstrategicinterventionswithexperimentationsintheurbanfabricofMilan(Italy);andsecondly,adoctoralresearchanalysingthevalueofcommunityco-designonruralareasintheHighlandsandIslandsassociatedwithLeapfrog,athree-year-fundedAHRCproject.Bothresearchprojectsaredesignprocessesthatsupportsocialinnovations,whicharepartofSocialDesign-designmotivatedbysocialdemandsandnotbythemarket-thatfosterssocialchangetowardssustainability(Manzini&Meroni,2014).Humanactivitiesarehighlydependentontherelationshipspeopleestablishwiththeirmilieu1-enablingorinhibitingaction/interaction(Buchanan&Margolin,1995).Themilieuconsistsoftangibleandintangiblecomponentsthathavebeendesignedbyhumans.Consequently,itcanbesupported,implementedorradicallychangedinacontinuousprocess.Therefore,wefocusontheenvironmentimpactuponpeople'sactionswithinco-designprocesses:placeandtheinteractionsoccurringonitcomposeaninterdependentrelationshipthathasitsbasisindesignresearchandsocialsciences.

1.1SocialsustainabilityTherearemyriaddefinitionsofsustainabilityandagreatnumberofdisciplinesinvolvedinthedebate.However,almostalldefinitionsrelyonthethreepillarsestablishedbytheUnitedNations(2002):environment,economicandsocialsystems(White,2013).Dempseyetal.(2011)averthatthesethreesystemsneedtobebalancedinordertoaddressholisticallythe‘wickedproblems’(Rittel&Webber,1973)thatsustainabilityembraces.Hopwoodetal.(2005)explainthatthedominantCartesianperspectiveoftheworld,whichseparatestheenvironmentfromhumanityanditsactions,isunabletoexplainthecomplexityanduncertaintyofhumanlife.Thisdemandsalternativeframeworksabletointegratequalitativemethodsthatcanbringdeeperunderstandingaboutpeople’slivesandhelpfostersocialinnovationandsustainability.Inthisregard,designactivismplaysakeyroleinenablingsocialchangeandinraisingawarenessaboutcommunalvaluesandbeliefs(Markussen,2013),wheretheseimprovementsemergefromexistingphysicalandsocialresources(Cipollaetal.,2015).Socialsustainabilityremainsunexploredboththeoreticallyandinpractice,identifying“trust,commonmeaning,diversity,capacityforlearningandcapacityforself-organization”(Missimer,2015,p.5)ascrucialelementsfordevelopingsustainability.Thus,weemphasisethesocialsysteminsupportingtheothertwobecause,asGonzález-rey(2008)states,cultureworksasacatalystforhumanbehaviour.Therefore,enhancingsustainabilityinevitablyimpliesaprocessofsociallearning(Dyballetal.,2007)andtheco-constructionofacommonlanguage.

1.2Communityengagement:asocietalanddesignshiftRecentlywehavewitnessedhowcommunityengagementhasbecomeprominentontheagendaofgovernmentsandnon-profitorganisations(Forss&Schwartz,2011).Thisisinresponsetothecurrentsocioculturalcontextcharacterisedbytheproactiveinvolvementofpeopleincommunityinitiativesthroughbottom-upandinformalmovements(Matarrita-Cascante&Brennan,2012),asaresultofthescarcityoflocalandnationalauthorities’actions.AccordingtotheScottishGovernment(2016),communityengagementensurescitizenshipparticipationinthedecision-makingofpublicservices.Thisneedsnon-profitorganisations,publicsectorandgrassrootsmovementsworking

1Milieu:“theaggregateofobjects,activities,servicesandenvironmentsthatfillsthelifeworld”(Buchanan&Margolin,1995,p.122)

Designforsocialsustainability

3

collectively,sharingresourcesandcreatingpartnerships-developingarenewedmultidimensionalframeworkbetweeninstitutionalnetworksandinterpersonalbonding-tosupportunfetteredsociallearning.ThesepartnershipsalsogainresonanceontheEuropeanCommissionresearchagenda,wheretheco-creationofpublicgoodscanbecomeawayforengagingcitizensandstakeholdersinshapingEuropeanidentity.Yetcitizensperceivepublicengagementasatokenisticandinsufficientlyinclusiveprocess,generatingscepticismandapathy(Escobaretal.,2014).Thesechallengesrequireidentifyingwaystounderstandholisticallythecultural-historicalcontextofcommunitiesinordertodesignparticipatoryapproachesthatfostersustainableengagement.

1.3PeopleandplaceContemporaryterritoriesareincreasinglyinfiniteareasofurbanfabric(cfr.the"no-stopcity”,Branzi,1970;Burdettetal.,2011)blurringthelimitsbetweenurbanandruralspaces(Lefebvre,2003),whereinfrastructuresofeconomicsuppliesandnewformsofmobilityre-shapetheenvironmentandourlifestyles(Park,1967;Webber,1998).Here,theinfrastructuresystem-motorways,railways,electricityandthelike-hasahugeimpactonredefiningthediverseusesandidentitiesofthedifferentrural-urbangeographies(Soja,2000).Inthiscontext,therelationshipbetweenpeopleandplacehasadifferentmeaningduetotheeconomicchanges.AccordingtoCastells(1977),thecapitalistmodelneedsabalancebetweenthepublicgoods-itemsofcollectiveconsumption-andtheprivatesectorinordertosupportthesocialfabric.However,inthelastdecades,collectiveconsumptionhasbeenprivatised(Marrifield,2014),leadingtoatransformationoftherelationshipbetweencitizensandthepublicrealm,fromoneofcollectiveactiontooneofprivatisedconsumption(Hoskyns,2005).Thishasrestyledasocietythatleanstowardindividualvaluesandwheretheglobaleconomicmodelislocatedatthecentre-stageonthestrategicagendaofgovernments,andcrisesarisesurroundingtheurbanisationprocess(Harvey,2012).Thisnewcultureleadstothedevaluationofworkandtheincreasingvalueofplacewherepeopledeveloptheneedofbelongingtoaparticulargeographicplaceasawaytoredefinetheiridentity(Sennett,2006).

Concurrently,“moreandmorepeoplearecollaboratingwitheachothertolivemoresociallycohesiveandsustainablelives”(Manzini&Staszowski,2013,p.1).Thisaction-reactiontoeconomicandsocietalchallengesaffectsthetransformationofthephysicalrealm;indeed,interpersonalrelationshipsarestronglyconnectedtothedevelopmentofthesenseofcommunity,whichoccursinplacesaffectedbyrenewedusesandidentities.Hence,thephysicalspaceassumestheroleofasocialactorinenablingorpreventingsocialinteractionswherethesocialsphereisalsospatiallyconstructedandthewaysocietyworksisinfluencedbyitsspatialstructure(Marchart,1998).

1.4Designactivism:strategiesforenhancingtransformationsDesignmethodsareable“toadvancepublicandsocialinnovationandachievecreativesolutionsbeyondthereachofconventionalstructures”(Mulgan,2014,p.1),providingastrategicapproachtocomplexsystemsofthings.Designresearchisprogressivelyfocusedontheroleofdesignasanactivatorofchange:assumingthat“allwedo,almostallthetime,isdesign”(Papanek,1972,p.17)andthateverybodydesigns(Manzini,2015),“designisanactofdeliberatelymovingfromanexistingsituationtoapreferredonebyprofessionaldesignersorothersapplyingdesignknowinglyorunknowingly”(Fuad-Luke,2013,p.5).Thesewell-knownstatementsshapethescenariothatdesignstudiesanddesignthinkingmethodologiesareapproaching,pinpointingtheconsiderabledebatearoundtheboundariesofdesignandtheroleofdesignersinthe21stcentury.


4

Design,asaprocessforachievingchange,embodiesactivismasaformofshiftingtonewparadigmsandvalues.Addressingourfocus,theactofdesigningisawaytointerveneinpeople’sperceptionsandassumptionsabouttheirrealities,influencingandaffectingpeople’sbehaviour.AccordingtoMarkussen(2013),“designactivismhasthepotentialtore-negotiatetherelationshipbetweenpeople’sdoing[...]andtheirfeelingsaboutthisdoing”(p.6),furthermoretheabilitytointerlacepeople’sneedsinordertoevokenewformsofinhabiting,therebyencouragingnewidentities.

Thesetwoon-goingPhDresearchprojectsfocusonconsciousdesignacts,includingParticipatoryActionResearch(PAR),aqualitativeresearchframeworkinvolvingresearchers,practitionersandpeopleactingforaplannedorganisationalchange(Avisonetal.2007)throughinclusionandcollectiveaction.Co-designisourdesignapproach,onewhichconsistsofintegratingpeoplefromdifferentbackgroundsandlevelsofexpertiseintothecreativeprocess(Sanders&Stappers,2008)enablingdesignerstoco-createwithpeopleandnotforthem(Bason,2010)inpursuitofatransformativeprocessinanimmediateproblematicsituation(Gilmoreetal.1986).Context-basedapproachesarecentralfordesigningstrategiesthatpromotenewformsofengagementandhelpdevelopasenseofcommunityidentity.Thisreflectiondefinesourtheoreticalresearchframework.

2.Thecontemporarycityasalivinglab:appliededucationalmethodologiesthroughco-designapproachThisdoctoralresearchisassociatedwiththePolimiDESISLab2,aresearchteamoftheDesignDepartmentofthePolitecnicodiMilano,inItaly.TheLab,partoftheworldwideDESISNetwork-DesignforSocialInnovationandSustainability3-involvesagroupofresearchersadoptingastrategicandasystemicapproachtodesign,particularlyfocusedondesignforservicesandinterior/spatialdesign4.Weuseacommunity-centreddesignapproachandourobjectiveistoexplorehowdesigncanenablepeople,communities,enterprisesandsocialactorstoactivateandmanageinnovationprocesses,aimedatexperimentingwithsustainable,convivialandcollaborativewaysoflivinganddoing.

MyPhDresearchprojectfocusesonanalysingthemutualinfluencesbetweenDesignforServicesandSpatialDesignas,especiallyaddressingtheirdisciplinaryconnectionsinresearchandappliedapproaches,ineducationalmethodologiesandprocesses.ThedoctoralresearchusestheDESISLab’sactivitiesandprojectsinamutualnourishment,alongwithteachingactivities-atPolitecnicoSchoolofDesignandotherpartnerinstitutions-basedonanexperientiallearningapproach.Thedialogicalrelationshipsin-betweenthetwodisciplineshavethereforebeenanalysedalsowithinthecontextofurbanpublicspacetransformation,inordertogetinsightsforoneoftheresearchquestions:howcouldspacesinfluence,generateandbeusedthroughservices,andvice-versa?

Thefieldresearchapproachestablishedinlocalcontextsbenefitsfromtheinvolvementofdesignstudentsandresearchers/professors,formingasystemofactors-includinglocalcommunitiesand 2www.desis.polimi.it3www.desisnetwork.org.DESISNetwork,bornin2009fromthreeinternationalactivities,isano-profitandculturalassociationsince2014andanevolvingnetworkofDesignLabsbasedindesignschoolsandindesign-orienteduniversitiesoperatingwithlocal,regionalandglobalpartnerstopromoteandsupportsocialchangetowardssustainability.4alongsidecontributionsfromstrategicdesign,user-centred-design,designforterritory,communication,economics,planningandsociology.TheLabisinvolvedinseverallocalandinternationalresearchprojectsandthegrouprunsalsopost-graduatecoursesanddesignstudios.


5

organizations,publicadministrationsandventures-involvedindesignactionsforsocialinnovation.Theseareexperimentssupportingresearchandapplyinga‘LivingLab’methodology.The‘LivingLab’isalong-termenvironmentforopeninnovationthatenablesexperimentationwithrealpeopleinrealcontexts.Thisfacthelpsunfoldthemoreintractableproblemsthroughtakingasystemapproach-comprisingmethodsofdesignthinkingandprototypinginaniterativeway.Intheexperiments,co-briefingsessions,co-designactivitiesandtheprototypingofdesignsolutionsrepresenttangibleandintangiblecomponentsofthedesignprocess.

Theproject-basedexperiments,conductedwithinthePolimiDesisLab,pursuespecificgoalsindifferenturbancontextsinthecityofMilanandarepilot-casesformydoctoralresearchtoadvanceinsights(emergingfromthepractice)andwillsupportthedevelopmentofaframework.

Oneofthese,herebrieflydescribed,is‘HumanCities-ChallengingtheCityScale’5,aEU-fundedresearchprojectthatexploreshowinhabitantsreclaimtheconstantly-evolvingcontemporarycity,especiallythroughexperimentsinthepublicrealm,andwaysofre-inventingcitylife.TheMilanworkprogrammewithintheresearchprojecthasbeensystematisedinanoverallprocesstomakethemostofthecomplexityofanPAR-basedproject(Fig.1).

Figure1.“HumanCities/ChallengingtheCityScale”researchprocessdiagram;createdbytheMilanDepartmentofDesignteamfortheHumanCitiesexhibitionatBaseMilanoduringtheMilanDesignWeek2016.

TheLabteam(5designexperts)framedaneducationaldesignprogrammetoset-upthe‘in-the-fieldactions’conductedbydesignstudentsandresearchersworkingtogether.Theideawastoinvolveinalong-termandarticulatedprocesscitizensandlocalorganizations,selectedfortheexperimentationlabs,fromLaPiana-ahidden,elevatedandpedestriansquare-andtheneighbourhoodarounditinMilan.LaPianaisano-man’s-landpublicspaceandisactuallytheoutdoorareaofAtirRinghieratheatre.TheprocesscomprisedcollaborationwiththeactiveSocialProgrammeofthetheatre,hence

5“HumanCities–ChallengingtheCityScale”,researchprojectco-fundedbytheCreativeEuropeProgrammeofTheEuropeanUnion,2014-2018.Thenetworkincludeselevenpartners:LaCitédudesign(FR),PolitecnicodiMilano(IT),UrbanPlanningInstituteoftheRepublicofSlovenia(SI),ClearVillage(UK),ZamekCieszyn(PL),AssociationDesignWeekBelgrade(RS),ProMateria(BE),AaltoUniversity(FI),FHJoanneum(AT),AssociationofEstoniandesigners(EST),Beaz(ES)andCultureLab(BE).


6

creatingalegacybetweenthelabresultsandthefutureofthephysicalrealm.Itwasinvolvedthroughout:theco-creationbriefingsessions(Oct2015),thedesignmaster-class6(Oct2015-Feb2016)andin-the-fieldexperimentations(Jan-June2016).Theparticipatoryprocesswasestablishedinordertoenhancetherelationshipbetweencitizensandthepublicspacebyusingdesignapproach,toolsandoutput.Theimpactofaddressingcontemporaryneedswithstrategicthinkingactsonmulti-levels:ontheonehand,thesixty-twointernationaldesignstudents–whoenrichedtheirskillswiththeabilitytocriticallyreflectandanalysephysicalandsocialcontexts-andontheother,theengagementoflocalcommunities(tenstakeholders:localorganizationsandinformalgroups)identifiedimplementers(collectionofneedsandstories),supporters(co-designactivities)(Fig.2),participants(experimentationlabs)(Fig.3)andreaders(disseminationprocess)throughoutthewholeprocess.Moreover,thetheatreactsasacatalystintheprocessofrestoringtheideaofasocialandculturalincubatorwithintheurbancontext.Thesetemporarydesignexperimentsallowedreachingquickconclusionsand‘putonstage’citizens’stories.

Figure2.Oneoftheco-designsessionsorganisedduringtheMasterclass“TemporaryUrbanSolutions”withintheresearchframework.Sixty-twointernationaldesignstudentsmeettenlocalorganizationsandinformalgroupsfromLaPianaareawiththesupportoftheSocialProgrammeofATIRRInghieraTheatre(localpartner).

6“TemporaryUrbanSolutions”,transdisciplinaryelectivecourse,MasterLevel.SchoolofDesign,PolitecnicodiMilano.Courseleader:DavideFassi


7

Figure3.FirstExperimentationLabatLaPiana,30thofJanuary,2016:TemporaryUrbanSolutionstoinhabitthesquare.

Asstatedabove,mydoctoralresearchtakesadvantageoftheseexperimentsaspilot-cases.Itseekstolayatheoreticalfoundationforareflectiononhowtheseprocessescanevolvefromdesignexperimentstoamorestrategic,long-termdevelopment,basedontheconceptsofagonisticspaceandinfrastructuring:“amoreopen-endedlongtermprocesswherediversestakeholderscaninnovatetogether”(Hillgrenetal.,2011,p.170).ThecombinationofPARandservicedesignbecomefundamentalsincebothdeal,constitutively,withactualcontexts:currentconditions,needs,usesandusers.Theirconstantadaptabilitytochangeprovidesreflections,approachesandactionsopen-ended.Therefore,thePhDfocusisonspatialandservicedesignaspects,tryingtorespondtothefollowingquestions:howcontinuouschangesinthetransformationofthebuiltenvironmentaffectpublicspaces(physicalandserviceinfrastructuring),andtheirusesandidentitiesinanopen-endedway?Howthedesignofspacesandplacesisaffectedbytheaddeduseofservicetoolswithinthedesignprocess?HowthespatialdesignistakingadvantageofUXdesignandservicedesign?Iarguethaturbanpublicspacescouldbeunderstoodasplatformofchangeabletoconnecttrans-nationalcommunities–atthemacro-scale–andtobetested–atthemicro-scale–throughprototypeddesignscenarios(Manzini,2003).Hence,theyaregoingthroughacontinuousoverlappingofconfigurations,dependingon:(1)howpeoplereclaimtheiruseintermsoftime(temporary,mediumandlongterm)andintermsoffunction(retail,entertainment,hospitality,work,leisure,convivialityandthelike);(2)howpeoplegothroughthem(newformsofmobility);and(3)newsocietaldynamics.

Thisisthewidersenseinwhichtherelationshipofpeopleandplaceisanalysed.Startingfromalocalscaleofexperiments-throughtheapplicationofco-designactivitiesandPAR-basedmethodologies-andobservingtherippleeffectthattheseexperimentshaveonawiderurbanscale,thedoctoralresearchaimstounderstandhowtemporaryandlocalexperimentationcanbecomesustainableover


8

timeintermsofservicesandspacesimpactbothintheircontextsandorientationofthinkingaswellasintheircontextsofapplication,inadditiontounderstandinghowtheyaffecttheglobalsystemaspartofawiderresearchonspatialandservicedesignmethodologiesindesigneducation.

ThefollowingphasesofmyPhDprojectaregoingtobeconductedattheUFRJUniversidadeFederaldoRiodeJaneiro(March/April2016)andattheInternationalCollegeofDesign&InnovationofTongjiUniversity,inShanghai(May/June2016).Thesefieldworkswillprovidemenewanddifferentscenariosofresearch.

Theaimistoanalyse-throughdidacticactivitiesindifferentlocalcontextsandwithstudentsfromdifferentbackgrounds-educationalmethodologiesandprocessesappliedwithafocusontheparticipativeuseofpublicspaceslookingatdirectorinverserelationshipswithlevelsofprivatisation,ononehand,andwithlevelsofengagementonthecollectiverealm,ontheother.

3.DesignethnographyontheIsleofMullThissectionoutlinesPhDresearchassociatedwith'Leapfrog',athree-year-UKdesignprojectfundedbyAHRC,concentratingtodesigningandevaluatingalternativeapproachestocommunityengagement.ThePhDresearchprojectaimstounderstandhowandinwhatwaysco-designcanbeusedasavehicletopromotesocialchange,inadditiontounderstandingsomeoftheprocesses,suchasinformallearning,thatco-designignites.Hence,thePhDresearchquestionis:Howcandesignresearchidentifyandvisualisetheinformallearningprocessthatcommunityco-designaffords?

Thepilotstudyinvolvedimmersingmyselfwithinthehumandynamicsaroundacommunityprocessinwhichpeoplegotinvolved,seekingtolearnhowtobetterengagewithintheircommunities.Thisentailedtheintroductionofco-designpracticestodevelopengagementtoolswithcommunitymembersdrawnfromdifferentorganisationslocatedontheIsleofMull,intheHighlandsandIslandsofScotland.Conductedoversixmonthswithatotaloffourvisits,thefieldworkadoptedadesignethnographyapproachenablingmetotakearoleofinsider-outsider.Designethnographyisbasedontraditionalethnography,yetitlastsashorterperiodoftime,enoughtograspthecontextforbuildingempathyandinsight(Hammersley&Atkinson,1995).Here,IusedGroundedTheoryasthetheoreticalframeworkbecauseoneoftheissuesofbeinganinsider-outsiderwithincommunitiesisthat,asresearcher,Ibringmyassumptionsandtheoreticalstandpointsandthiscanmisleadtheresearch.Inqualitativeresearch,theresearcherisanactiveactorindatacollectionandintheanalysis(CorbinDwyer&Buckle,2009),andalsoshapesthecontextalongsidethecommunitymembers.Aboutthis,Asselin(2003)recommendsresearcherstoadoptanapproachofknowingnothingaboutthecontextasawaytopreventbias.Besides,theorycannotlead;rather,itistheimmersioninthecontextthatexplainswhatishappening.GroundedTheoryreliesontheprinciplesthateverythingiscontinuallychangingandthereforenothingcanbepredeterminedbecausepeoplehavethemeanstorespondtothechangingcontextualfactors(Corbin&Strauss,1990).Thisenablesthecontexttobringforthknowledgethatcomesoutfromthepractice.


9

Figure4.IsleofMullmap:locationofthepilotcase.Author:MirianCalvo.

3.1Humanscale:enclosedsemi-publicspacesInmyfirstandthirdvisits,Iattended,asaparticipant-observer,severalco-designworkshopsfacilitatedbytheLeapfrogteam.Participant-observationisanethnographicmethodthatenabledmetoenvisageagreaterawarenessofcontextandbuildempathicrelationshipswithparticipants(Calvo,Sclater&Smith,2016).Inthefirstworkshopthepurposewastoidentifybarriersandopportunitiesandafterwards,co-negotiatetheintendedoutcomesbypayingattentiontoindividuals’conflicts.Focusedonimprovingcommunityengagement,thesecondworkshopconsistedofcollectively–i.e.ingroupsofthreepeoplewithonefacilitatoreach-co-designingengagementtoolsthatwillpotentiallyenhancepublicengagement.Thereafter,inthethirdvisitwebroughttheprototypesoftheengagementtoolspreviouslyco-designed,andIconductedinterviews.Iwasalsoinvitedtocollaborateinaconsultationeventwithoneoftheparticipants(co-creators)inhercommunitysetting.


10

Figure5.Axonometricdrawing:Co-designWorkshop1.Author:MirianCalvo.

Reflectingontheenvironmentalconditionsoftheroomwhichhostedtheevents,myinsightwasthatthephysicalspacewastoosmalltoaccommodatecollectiveandcreativeactivities.Thephysicalrealmplaysitsroleinenablingorpreventinghumanbehaviourandsocialinteractions(Gehl&Svarre,2013;Whyte,1980).Thespacewasoccupiedbytworectangulartablesandninechairs(Fig.5).Participantsarrived,satinoneplaceandstayedthereuntilthebreak,whenpeoplegatheredinthefood-drinkarea,creatingabottleneckandalongwaitforfood.Thenpeoplesatbackdownintheirseats.Theuseoftablesandchairsenablescertaintypesofhumanbehavioursuchastakingnotes,listening,beingcomfortableandrelaxed(seatdown),butitalsoencouragespeopletobehaveasstudents-passiveagentsinaone-wayconversation(Fig.6).Thisbehaviouralpatternislargelycausedbythetraditionaluseofthespaceandtheelementsinit.Thisalsoaffectsthepowerdynamicsbetweenparticipantsanddesignerswhohaveallthepowerintheseconversationsbecauseparticipantsadoptamorepassiveandstudentrole.


11

Figure6.Axonometricdrawing:Co-designWorkshop2.Author:MirianCalvo.

Theroomhadawallthatwasusedtoprojectpresentationsandtostickidea-generationconcepts.Thewall,usedasaphysicaldisplayinworkspaces,isakeycomponentthatfacilitatesdynamicparticipation(Fruchter&Bosch-Sijtsema,2011).Moreover,itisanenvironmentalconditionthatenablesindividualandcollectivereflection-in-action(seeSchön,1987).Theproblemwasthatthefurnitureinhibitedparticipantsfrommovingfreelyandminglingwithpeopleattheothertable,aswellasinteractionswiththewall.Thiscouldbeaddressedbytakingthefurnitureout,whichwouldpermitpeopletomoveastheyplease,sparkingcollectiveconversations.Evenleavingthechairsandshapingacirclecouldignitemoreinnovativeandcreativeactivities(Fig.7).


12

Figure7.Axonometricdrawing:alternativeuseofthewallandthephysicalspace.Author:MirianCalvo.

3.2Territorialscale:thegeographicphysicalrealmMyothervisitsconsistedofethnographictripsinwhichIalso‘shadowed’oneparticipantinhernaturalsetting.‘Shadowing’isanethnographictechniquethatenabledmetoholisticallyobservetheparticipant’smoods,bodylanguage,herpaceandthewaysheinteractedwithotherpeople.IntheworkshopsInoticedthatparticipants’conversationswererelatedtoaparticularphysicalplace.Hence,itbecamecrucialformetoknowbettertheterritoryandthegeographicfeaturesoftheisland.Theterritoryaffectshumansettlementsandhinderstheconstructionofinfrastructures–roads,broadbandnetworksandthelike.Asaresult,communitiesbecomeisolatedamongstthemselvesshapingtheirlifestyleanddevelopingastrongbondwiththeirplace(people-place).Thisinsightisevidencedinthefollowingquotes:


13

“Themajorpopulationisuphere.ThisisTobermoryandthatisaverymixedcommunitybutit’salsopushedtothetopoftheisland.Yourealise,itisabigisland,andittakesquitealongtimetogetrounditthroughthoseroads.[…]Therearemanyothersmallcommunitiesspreadontherestoftheisland.[…]ThisistheRossofMull.Theytendtobealmostaseparatecommunitybecauseitisalongwaythroughherebyroad”(participant5).

“Thisisaveryisolatedplace,youneedspaceinahousebecauseifitisrainingoutsideandyouhaveaone-hourdrivetothenearestshop,youneedtobecomfortableandhappyinyourhome”(participant3).

Figure8.Reflectivedrawing:IsleofMullmap:naturalandbuiltenvironment(visit2).Author:MirianCalvo.

Fromaterritorialstandpoint,shortageofpublicspacestypifiesruralareas,asinthiscase.Oneofthebiggestissueswehaveinthesecommunitiesisthatthereisnotenoughpubliclifeandthereforeitfailstohaveenoughimpactuponthecommunity(Alexander,Ishikawa&Silverstein,1977).Nevertheless,therearepeopleconductingcommunityinitiativestocounteractthisphenomenon,suchasParticipant8whowasworkinginacommunityprojectwhichconsistedofrefurbishingapieceoflandindisuseandshesaid:

“Itisaboutprovidingthemaplacewheretheycangowiththeirfriendsandfamiliesandusethepark,sotheygofortheirlovelywalksandchildrenlearntorideabikethere,thingslikethat…thingsthatnowwedon’thave.Soit’saverymuchsocialplaceanyway”.


14

4.DiscussionsFromahumanscalestandpoint,basedonourreflectionswedrawattentiontotheroleofthephysicalrealmasakey(andlargelystilluntapped)dimensiontotakeintoaccountinthedesignprocessofcommunityco-designactivities.Ourearlyfindingssuggestthatthephysicalspacehasthemeanstoenableorhindercreativeandcollaborativeinteractionsamongstparticipantsinco-designactivitiesinbothcasestudiesanalysed:enclosedsemi-publicspacesandopenpublicspaces.Conversely,thedesignofcommunityspacesandcollaborativeactionsthroughthedirectinvolvementofcitizenscontributestotheprocessofstrengtheninglong-termrelationshipsbetweenpeopleandplaces.Thismutualinfluenceplaysakeyroleintheprocessofapplicationofsuchmethodologies.Inthisregard,thereisagreatdiversityofco-designactivities,fromcommunityplanningeventstoinformal/formalinterestgroupmeetings.Thenatureofthetypeofaco-designactivityhingesontheaimofthedesigncontext,aswellastheaudience.Forinstance,Fuad-Luke(2013,p.178)classifiesco-designactivitiesbasedontwovariables:public-private,anddesigner-ledversusnon-designer-led.Infact,withinthevariableofpublic-private,therearemyriadphysicalspacessupportingsuchco-designactivities,ascanbeappreciatedwithinourcasesstudies.Indeed,aco-designprocessmightentailsaseriesofco-designactivitieswhichrespondtothedifferentphasesoftheprocess,wheresomeofthemmightbehostedinenclosedprivatespaceswithsmallnumbersofparticipantsandothersinopenpublicspaceswithalargenumberofparticipants.Therefore,wearguethatdesignstrategiesorientedtoembedthematerialecologieswhichsustainco-designactivitiesshouldnotbeaddressedfollowingaprescriptiveapproach;rather,lookingforqualitiesofthephysicalrealm.Additionally,ourreflectionsalsounfoldhowtheuseofco-designbecomesavehicletoengagecitizenshiptowardsthetransformationofourenvironment.AccordingtoMeusburger(2009),thisinteractionaldimensionplaysakeyroleinthedevelopmentofcreativity,wherethesocialandmaterialecologiescanfosterorhindersuchadevelopment.SternbergandLubart(1991)addthatbeforeacreativeprocessstarts,anindividualneedstointeractwithastimulatingenvironment.Here,welookforspatialqualitiessuchasflexibility,adaptabilityandsensitivity-spacesthatenabletheflourishingofcreativeandcollaborativeprocesses.Indeed,theuseofco-designinenvironmentaltransformation,whereprocesses“refertothecreativityofdesignersandpeoplenottrainedindesignworkingtogetherinthedesigndevelopmentprocess”(Sanders&Stappers,2008,p.6)andwheretheseprocesses“actasdesigningnetworks[…]inwhicheverybody,non-expertandexpertalike,designs”(Manzini,2015,p.49),doesnotprovidespecificrecipesforthespatialdefinition.Yettheuseofco-designinthiscontexthelpsunfoldareflectionabouttowhatextentproject-basedexperimentationmightguideinfrastructuringinthedevelopmentofdemocraticprocesses.Co-designis,infact,avalue-creationandnotavalue-deliveryprocess,whichaimstocontributetoacontexttransformationthroughaninformallearningprocess(Calvo,Sclater&Smith,2016)–alsocalled‘mutuallearning’(Fuad-Luke,2013,p.147)-thatenablesknowledge-exchange,theacquisitionofself-awarenessandself-responsibility,aswellascapacitybuilding.Centraltoco-designistheprocessitself-notthefinaloutcomes-sinceitprovidesinspirationtothedesignteamforthedevelopmentofconceptsandinnovations,whichincludesthedesigningoftoolsforensuringthecontinuationofsuchco-designactivitiesoncethedesignerisnolongerpresent.Especially,co-designbecomesavehicletorevealbothopportunitiesanddilemmas,throughaniterativeprocessthathasthemeanstoreduceconflictsandtoforeground‘agonisticspaces’(seeMouffe,2007).‘Agonism’isatermthatdenotesademocraticmodelthatdefines‘thepolitical’asthedimensionofconfrontation,whichisinherenttohumanrelationships(seeMouffe,2000).Hence,agonisticspacerefers,withinthismodel,toapermanent(abstract)spacewheresuchinterpersonalconfrontationscanbeexpressedandre-channelledinacollectivepositivewaythroughthecompromiseofdiversestandpoints-observingtheconflictasanopportunitytocreatepositive


15

change.Democratisationhelpsturn“antagonismintoagonism”(Björgvinssonetal.,2010,p.48)andisfundamentalinenhancingasenseofsharedownership,engagementandlegitimisationoftheprocessoftransformationofagivenspace.Onthismatter,wesuggesttolookatthequalitiesofagonisticspacesinordertofindinspirationtoframethespatialdimensionofco-designactivities,whereco-designcreatesaboundaryspace(Edwards,2011)-alsoreferredtoasa‘thirdspace’(Gutiérrez2008)-fortransformingenvironmentsorsocietalproblems.

Correspondingtothetemporarinessofplacesandsettings,itisthetemporarinessofusers,theso-called‘interimuser’(Belloni,2008)wholiveshereandnowintheurbanplaceandgeneratesthetransformation.Inthissense,weliveandundertakeactivitieswithinaframeworkdefinedbytimeandspace,inanenvironmentalsystemthatwehavecreated(Park,1967),whichisdifferentfromthenaturaloneandwhichwecallculture(González-Rey,2008).Thissystemoperatesonsymbolicandemotionallevels;hencetheenvironmentacquiressymbolicandemotionalmeaningsbasedonthepeopleusingit.“Peoplemakeplaces,morethanplacesmakepeople”(Worpole&Knox,2007,p.2).Simultaneously,onamicrolevel,individualsadoptdifferentbehavioursdependingontheenvironmentalconditionsandonthepeoplesurroundingthem.Aboutthis,Harvey(2016)states:

"'Environment'iswhateversurroundsor,tobemoreprecise,whateverexistsinthesurroundingsofsomebeingthatisrelevanttothestateofthatbeingataparticularmoment.Plainly,the'situatedness'ofabeinganditsinternalconditionsandneedshaveasmuchtosayaboutthedefinitionofenvironmentasthesurroundingconditionsthemselves"(p.160).

Here,thenotionofenvironmentacquiresmovementandevolvesinrelationtothesocio-historicalcontext.Peopleliveexperiences,establishrelationshipsandshapetheirpersonalstoriesinpathsratherthaninplacesbecauselifebindstimeandplaceatthesametime(Ingold,2016).Theideaoftransformingtheenvironmentthatsurroundsuscouldbeseenasoneofthebasicmotiveswhichtriggerus,humanbeings,tomakethings(action-oriented)throughaprocessofinteractingwiththematerialecologies–observingandexperiencinguntilwefeelcomfortableenoughinthemodifiedenvironment.However,asHoskyns(2005)states,thedesignoftheenvironmentalconditionsthatsupporthumanactivitiescanonlycreatepossibilitiesforsocialinteractions.Thesamephysicalspacechangesitsfunctionsconcerningtheusethatpeoplemakeofit.

“Explorehowco-designingourservicescouldbethenextcriticalevolutionofSDtoensurethesustainableintegrationofhumanandnaturalecologiesofourcities.Indeed,thepropositionhereisthatco-designingservicesinanopeninnovationenvironmentisapre-requisiteforco-futuring”atermtheauthorcoinedin2009tosignifymoreparticipatorydemocraticformsofdecision-makinginformedbydesignandleadingtoanticipatorydemocracy(Fuad-Luke2012,p.103).

Fromaterritorialscaleperspective,publiclifehappensinpublicspacesandtherelationshipbetweenpeopleandplaceisdescribedasaself-organisedcyclethatcomestofruitiononceaplaceseemsattractivebecausepeoplestartgatheringthere(Mikoleit&Pürkhauer,2011).Thus,publicspaceplaysacrucialroleinthesociallifeofourcommunitiesandreflectsawidersocial,economicandpoliticalcondition.Withoutit,wewouldhaveneitherthephysicalsupportforexpressingourselves,northesymbolicmeaninganditsrelationshipwithouridentity.Furthermore,itencouragesusto


16

thinkasacollectiveandtobepartofthecommunity.Itentailstherelationshiptopeople,tonatureandthetechnologywedecidetouse.Onthismatter,wehaveidentifieddifferencesbetweentheurbanexperimentsinMilanandthepilotstudyintheruralcommunitiesontheIsleofMull.Aswementionedbefore,thelackofpublicspacesinruralareasinhibitstheblossomingofpubliclife,somethingfundamentalindevelopingcommunitylife.Wecouldarguethat,ontheIsleofMull,onlythemainstreetofTobermorycouldbeconsideredasapublicspace,definedasaplacethatisopenandaccessibletoallkindsofcitizens,regardlessofgender,race,ethnicity,ageandsocio-economicclass,whichbecomesavesseltocarrypositivecommunalmeaningsshapedbythecommunity.Instead,publiclifemainlyoccursinchurches,non-profitorganisationvenues,and/orpubs-privatespaces-somehowincreasingthefeelingofisolation.Conversely,intheurbanenvironmentofMilaninperipheralareas,isolatedpublicareasaretheresultofspecificconditionsduetoahiddenposition,unfavourableuseinthepast,orarearoundleftoverplacesandbuildings.Theseconditionsinhibitandhindernewformsoflivingandanynewsenseofbelonging.Thecityanditsclosesurroundingsprovidespacesthatareunusedsincetheyfailtoreachtheactualneedsandimpliedwillofcitizens,entailingawasteofresourcesandpotentialitiesintermsofsocial,economicalandhumancapital.Infact,aswementionedattheoutset,sustainabilityinevitablyrequiressimultaneouslyworkingonthethreesystems-environmental,economicandsocial-inordertoaddressthemajorproblemsthatsocietyfacesinthe21stcentury.However,weemphasisetheroleofthesocioculturalsystembecausesocialbehaviouris,tosomeextent,governedbythepowerofculture.Therefore,fromourunderstanding,asocialreflectionaboutsustainabilityisneededinordertochangeindividuals'behaviourandbringaccountabilitytotheireverydaylivesthroughaprocessofsociallearning.Inthissense,communityco-designprocesseshavethemeanstoignitethissociallearningbyprovidingspacesforreflection,andpotentiallycollectiveaction.

Inaconnectedworld,thelocaljoinswiththeglobal:microenvironments,activatedbymultipleinterventionsandinterrelatedactions,composeapermeable,denationalisedplatform.Theyactinaholisticwayinwhichevenmarginallocationscanbecomepartofglobalnetworks,spreadingtheirinfluenceandinfluencingtheglobalsystem(Sassen,2004).Simultaneously,atthecommunitylevel,themicro-individualpsychologicalandbehaviouralconceptions–andthemacrolevels-institutionalandcommunityconceptions–aremutuallyinfluenced(Perkinsetal.,2002).Thislastrelationshipinfluenceshighorlow“socialcapital”7levels,extremelyrelevantindevelopinginterpersonal,communityandinstitutionalsenseoftrust,socialcommitmentandsenseofsecurity,andwithaclearimpactontheuseofpublicspaces.

Therefore,effectiveexperimentation,strategicco-designapproachesandqualitativeenquiryarefundamentaltoenablingorinhibitingactionsandinteractionsinplacesinaparticipativeandinclusiveway:anyexclusivelytop-downactioninpublicspaceswouldleadtonewspaceswithoutmeaningaswellastheabsenceoftrustedmilieuwouldleadtoanincreaseofaprivatisedconsumptionofthepublicrealm,asitoccursinmarginalisedorunderservedpopulationscontexts.Instead,dialecticalandreflectiveapproachesstrengthentheimplementationofitspotentialitiesinamoreenduringway,withinanecosystemfavourabletotheinclusionandthecollaborationamonginstitutions,citizens,publicadministrationsandventures.

7“Socialcapitalisgenerallydefinedandmeasuredattheinterpersonal,community,institutional,orsocietallevelsintermsofnetworks(bridging)andnormsofreciprocityandtrust(bonding)withinthosenetworks.Socialcapitalshouldbeanalyzedinamulti-levelecologicalframeworkintermsofbothindividualpsychologicalandbehavioralconceptions(senseofcommunity,collectiveefficacy—orempowerment,neighboring,andcitizenparticipation)andinstitutionalandcommunitynetwork-levelconceptions.”(Perkinsetal.,2002,p.33).


17

ReferencesAlexander,C.,Ishikawa,S.&Silverstein,M.(1977).APatternlanguage.NewYork:OxfordUniversity

Press.Asselin,m.e.(2003).Insiderresearch:Issuestoconsiderwhendoingqualitativeresearchinyourown

setting.JournalofNursesinStaffDevelopment,19(2),99-103.Avison,D.,Baskerville,R.&Myers,M.D.(2007).Thestructureofpowerinactionresearchprojects.

InInformationSystemsActionResearch(pp.19–41).Springer.Bason,Christian(2010).LeadingPublicSectorInnovation.Co-creatingforabettersociety.Bristol:

PolicyPress.Belloni,M.C.(2008).Lacittàcomescena,lescenedellacittà[Thecityasaset,thesetofthecities].

InFrancescodeBiase,L’artedellospettatore.Ilpubblicodellaculturatrabisogni,consumietendenze[Theartofthespectator.Thepublicofculturein-betweenneeds,consumptionandtrends],FrancoAngeli,Milan,41–42.

Björgvinsson,E.,Ehn,P.,&Hillgren,P.-A.(2010).Participatorydesignanddemocratizinginnovation(pp.41–50).PresentedattheProceedingsofthe11thBiennialparticipatorydesignconference,ACM.

Buchanan,R.,&Margolin,V.(1995).Discoveringdesign:explorationsindesignstudies.UniversityofChicagoPress.

Burdett,R.,Sudjic,D.,&Cavusoglu,O.(2011).Livingintheendlesscity.Phaidon.Campbell,J.(2005).NationalStandardsforCommunityEngagement.ScottishCommunity

DevelopmentCentre.CommunitiesScotland.RetrievedNovember26,2016,fromhttp://www.gov.scot/resource/doc/94257/0084550.pdf

Calvo,M.,Sclater,M.&Smith,P.(2016)Cultural-HistoricalActivityTheoryandInformalLearningasaKeyComponentofCo-designPracticeinaCommunityInitiative.In8thTriennialConferenceESREA(EuropeanSocietyofResearchontheEducationofAdults),ImaginingdiversefuturesforAdultEducation:Questionsofpowerandresourcesofcreativity(pp.8-11).MaynoothUniversity,Ireland,September2016.

Castells,M.(1977).TheUrbanQuestion.AMarxistApproach.Cambridge,Mass:MITPress.Cipolla,C.,Melo,P.,ManziniE.(2015).CollaborativeServicesinInformalSettlements:Social

InnovationinaPacifiedFavelainRioDeJaneiro.NewFrontiersinSocialInnovationResearch,128-42.

CommunityPlanninginScotland(2016).Gov.scot.RetrievedNovember27,2016,fromhttp://www.gov.scot/Topics/Government/PublicServiceReform/CP.

Corbin,J.&Strauss,A.(1990).GroundedTheoryResearch:Procedures,CanonsandEvaluativeCriteria.ZeitschriftfurSoziologie,19(6),418-427.Retrieved11december,2016,fromhttp://www.zfs-online.org/index.php/zfs/article/viewFile/2741/2278

CorbinDwyer,S.&Buckle,J.L.(2009).TheSpaceBetween:OnBeinganInsider-OutsiderinQualitativeResearch.InternationalJournalofQualitativeMethods,8(1).Retrieved12December,2016,fromhttps://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/IJQM/article/view/2981

Dempsey,N.,Bramley,G.,Power,S.&Brown,C.(2011).Thesocialdimensionofsustainabledevelopment:Definingurbansocialsustainability.SustainableDevelopment,19(5),289-300.

Desmet,P.M.A.,&Hekkert,P.(2007).Frameworkofproductexperience.InternationalJournalofDesign,1(1),57-66.

Edwards,A.(2011).Buildingcommonknowledgeattheboundariesbetweenprofessionalpractices:Relationalagencyandrelationalexpertiseinsystemsofdistributedexpertise,InternationalJournalofEducationalResearch,50,33-39.

Escobar,O.,Faulkner,W.&Rea,H.J.(2014).BuildingCapacityforDialogueFacilitationinPublicEngagementAroundResearch.JournalofDialogueStudies,2(1),87-111.


18

Forss,K.&Schwartz,R.(2011).Introduction.InK.Forss,M.Marra&R.Schwartz(Eds.),EvaluatingtheComplex.Attribution,ContributionandBeyond.ComparativePolicyEvaluation18(1-32).NewJersey:Transactionpublishers.

Fuad-Luke,A.(2013).Designactivism:beautifulstrangenessforasustainableworld.Routledge.Fuad-Luke,A.(2012).Co-designingServicesintheCo-futuredCity,pp.101-120.InKuosa,T.,&

Westerlund,L.(2012).Servicedesign:ontheevolutionofdesignexpertise(DynamicFuturesLahtiUniversityofAppliedSciencesSeriesA,Researchreports,part17.SeriesEditorIlkkaVäänänen).

Fruchter,R.&Bosch-Sijtsema,P.(2011).TheWALL:participatorydesignworkspaceinsupportofcreativity,collaboration,andsocialization.AI&Society,26(3),221-232.

Gehl,J.&Svarre,B.(2013).HowtoStudypublicLife.Washington,DC:IslandPress.Gilmore,T.,Krantz,J.,&Ramirez,R.(1986).Actionbasedmodesofinquiryandthehost-researcher

relationship.Consultation:AnInternationalJournal.González-Rey,F.(2008).Subjetividadsocial,sujetoyrepresentacionessociales[SocialSubjectivity,

subjectandsocialrepresentations].Diversitas:PerspectivasenPsicología,4(2),225-243.Gutiérrez,K.(2008).DevelopingaSociocriticalLiteracyintheThirdSpace.ReadingResearch

Quarterly,43(2),148-164.Hammersley,M.&Atkinson,P.(1995).Ethnography:principlesinpractice.London:Routledge.Harvey,D.(2016).TheWaysoftheWorld.NewYork:OxfordUniversityPress.Harvey,D.(2012).Rebelcities:fromtheRighttotheCitytotheUrbanRevolution.NewYork:Verso.Hillgren,P.-A.,Seravalli,A.,&Emilson,A.(2011).Prototypingandinfrastructuringindesignforsocial

innovation.CoDesign,7(3-4),169–183.Hopwood,B.,Mellor,M.&O’Brien,G.(2005).SustainableDevelopment:MappingDifferent

Approaches.SustainableDevelopment,13,38-52.Hoskyns,T.(2005).DesigningtheAgon:QuestionsonArchitecture,Space,Democracyand“the

Political”.InB.Latour&P.Weibel(Eds.),MakingThingsPublic:AtmosphereofDemocracy(pp.798-803).Cambridge,Mass:MITPress.

Ingold,T.(2016).Lines.ABriefHistory.MiltonPark,UK:Routledge.Lefebvre,H.(2003).LaRévolutionurbaine[TheUrbanRevolution].(19701stEd.).Minneapolis:

UniversityofMinnesotaPress.Manzini,E.(2015).Design,WhenEverybodyDesigns:AnIntroductiontoDesignforSocialInnovation.

(R.Coad,Trans.).Cambridge,Massachusetts:MitPress.Manzini,E.,Meroni,A.Catalysingsocialresourcesforsustainablechanges.Socialinnovationand

community-centreddesign.InVezzoli,C.,etal.(2014).Product-servicesystemdesignforsustainability.GreenleafPublishing.

Manzini,E.,&Staszowski,E.(2013).PublicandCollaborative:ExploringtheIntersectionofDesign,SocialInnovationandPublicPolicy(DESISNetwork).LibraryofCongressCataloguing-in-PublicationData.Manzini,E.(2003).Scenariosofsustainablewellbeing.DesignPhilosophyPapers,1(1),5–21.Marchart,O.(1998).Art,SpaceandPublicSphere(s).RetrievedNovember25,2016,from

http://eipcp.net/transversal/0102/marchart/enMarkussen,T.(2013).TheDisruptiveAestheticsofDesignActivism:EnactingDesignBetweenArtand

Politics.DesignIssues,29(1),38-50.Marrifield,A.(2014).TheNewUrbanQuestion.London:PlutoPressMatarrita-Cascante,D.&Brennan,M.(2012).Conceptualisingcommunitydevelopmentinthe

twenty-firstcentury.CommunityDevelopment.43(3),293-305.RetrievedNovember28,2016,fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2011.593267


19

Meusburger,P.(2009).Theroleofplaces,environments,andspatialcontexts.InP.Meusburger,J.Funke&E.Wunder(Eds.),MilieusofCreativity.AnInterdisciplinaryApproachtoSpatialityofCreativity,(pp.97-153).Springer.RetrievedMarch28,2017,fromhttps://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4020-9877-2_7

Mikoleit,A.&Pürckhauer,M.(2011).TheUrbanCode.Cambridge:MITPress.Missimer,M.(2015).Socialsustainabilitywithintheframeworkforstrategicsustainable

development.DoctoralDissertationSeriesNo.2015:09.Karlskrona,Sweden:BlakingeInstituteofTechonology.

Mouffe,C.(2007).Artisticactivismandagonisticspaces.Art&Research,1(2),1-5.Mouffe,C.(2000).Thedemocraticparadox.London:Verso.Mulgan,G.(2014).Designinpublicandsocialinnovation:whatworksandwhatcouldworkbetter.

Retrievedfromwww.nesta.org.ukPapanek,V.,&Fuller,R.B.(1972).Designfortherealworld.ThamesandHudsonLondon.Park,R.(1967).OnSocialControlandCollectiveBehavior.Chicago:ChicagoUniversityPress.Perkins,D.D.,Hughey,J.,&Speer,P.W.(2002).Communitypsychologyperspectivesonsocialcapital

theoryandcommunitydevelopmentpractice.JournaloftheCommunityDevelopmentSociety,33(1),33–52.

Rittel,H.W.J.&Webber,M.M.(1973).Dilemmasinageneraltheoryofplanning.PolicyScience,4(2),155-169.Retrieved15December,2016,from:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01405730

Sanders,E.&Stappers,P.(2008).Co-creationandthenewlandscapesofdesign.CoDesign:InternationalJournalofCoCreationinDesignandtheArts,4(1),5-18.Retrieved9December,2016,fromhttp://www.maketools.com/articles-papers/CoCreation_Sanders_Stappers_08_preprint.pdf

Sassen,S.(2004).Localactorsinglobalpolitics.CurrentSociology,52(4),649–670.Sennett,R.(2006).TheCultureoftheNewCapitalism.USA:YaleUniversityPress.Schön,D.A.(1987).EducatingtheReflectivePractitioner.SanFrancisco,California:Jossey-BassInc.,

Publishers.Soja,E.(2000).Postmetropolis.CriticalStudiesofCitiesandRegions.Oxford:BlackwellPublishers

Ltd.Sternberg,R.E.&Lubart,T.I.(1991).Aninvestmenttheoryofcreativityanditsdevelopment.

HumanDevelopment,34,1–31.UnitedNations(2002).ReportoftheWorldSummitonSustainableDevelopment.Johannesburg,

SouthAfrica.Walker,E.T.,McQuarrie,M.&Lee,C.W.(2015).RisingParticipationandDecliningDemocracy.In

C.W.Lee,M.McQuarrie&E.T.Walker(Eds.),DemocratizingInequalities.DilemmasofNewPublicParticipation(3-26).NewYork:NewYorkUniversityPress.

Webber,M.M.(1998).TheJoysofSpread-City.UrbanDesignInternational,3(4),201-206.White,M.A.(2013).Sustainability:IknowitwhenIseeit.EcologicalEconomics,86,213-217.

RetrievedNovember22,2016,fromhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800912005034

Whyte,W.(1980).Thesociallifeofsmallurbanspaces.WashingtonD.C.:ConservationFoundation.Worpole,K.&Knox,K.(2007).Thesocialvalueofpublicspaces.York:JosephRowntreeFoundation.


20

AbouttheAuthors:

MirianCalvoPhDcandidateandteachingassistantattheGlasgowSchoolofArt,withinInDI.Sheisalsoaco-researcherat‘Leapfrog’,three-year-fundedprojectbytheArts&HumanitiesResearchCouncil(AHRC).HerPhDresearchassociatedwithLeapfrogaimstoanalysesomeoftheprocesses,suchasinformallearning,thatco-designignites.

AnnalindaDeRosaPhDcandidateandteachingassistantatPolitecnicodiMilano,DesignDepartment.Sheisresearchcollaboratorfor‘HumanCities,ChallengingtheCityScale’project,co-fundedbytheCreativeEuropeProgrammeoftheEUandherresearchisfocusedonthemutualinfluencesin-betweenSpatialDesignandDesignforServicesineducationalmethodologiesandprocesses.

Acknowledgements:Leapfrog,theArtsandHumanitiesResearchCouncil(AHRC)andCreativeFuturePartnerships(CFP)supportpartiallythisPhDresearch.IthankthecommunitiesfromtheIsleofMullinvolvedinthepilotstudy,mypeersfromtheInstituteofDesignInnovation(InDI),TheGlasgowSchoolofArt(GSA)andImaginationLancaster(LU)whoprovideinsightandexpertisethatgreatlyassisttheresearch,althoughtheymaynotagreewithalloftheinterpretationsofthispaper.TheDepartmentofDesign-PolitecnicodiMilanoresearchunitwithinthe“HumanCities/ChallengingtheCityScale”researchprojectandwithinthePolimiDesisLabinvolvedinthedesignresearchesmentionedinthepaper.

design for social sustainability. - radarradar.gsa.ac.uk/5293/1/id1333_ead12-environment_ calvo de...

Documents