department of environmental protection ......29 30 37 46 31 34 41 29 37 21 22 17 374 net change...
TRANSCRIPT
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
DIVISION OF CLIMATE, CLEAN ENERGY & RADIATION
PROTECTION
RADIATION PROTECTION ELEMENT
MONTHLY REPORT
JUNE 1 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2021
SECTION I: OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
SECTION II: BUREAU OF X-RAY COMPLIANCE
A. OFFICE OF THE BUREAU CHIEF
B. REGISTRATION SECTION
C. MACHINE SOURCE SECTION
D. TECHNOLOGIST EDUCATION AND LICENSING SECTION
E. MAMMOGRAPHY SECTION
F. BUREAU ENFORCEMENT SERVICES SECTION
SECTION III: BUREAU OF ENVIRONMENTAL RADIATION
A. OFFICE OF THE BUREAU CHIEF
B. RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS PROGRAM
C. ROUTINE ACTIVITIES
D. SUMMARY OF ENFORCEMENT – NOVEMBER 2020
E. RADIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SECTION
(REAS)
F. RADON SECTION
SECTION IV: BUREAU OF NUCLEAR ENGINEERING
A. OFFICE OF THE BUREAU CHIEF
B. NUCLEAR ENGINEERING SECTION
C. NUCLEAR ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SECTION
D. NUCLEAR EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS SECTION
SECTION I- OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
Original signed by:
__________________________
Assistant Director, Pat Mulligan
Page 2 of 43
SECTION II – BUREAU OF X-RAY COMPLIANCE (BXC)
A. OFFICE OF THE BUREAU CHIEF
CRCPD H-7 Committee on Diagnostic X-ray, Monthly Technical Trends and Topics
On June 1, Bureau staff participated in CRCPD H-7 Committee on Diagnostic X-ray conference
call to discuss current issues and topics of mutual concern to State X-ray compliance personnel.
National Practitioners Data Bank Facility Registration Renewal and Attestation
On June 1, the Radiologic Technology Board of Examiners registration was renewed with the
National Practitioners Data Bank including Attestation of the reported activities since the last
attestation.
Bureau Webinar Training Activities
Bureau staff participated in the following Webinar training activities: 10 June, California EPA'S
Pollution and Prejudice Project; 17 June, HDIAC Webinar: The “Tyranny of Distance” in
Homeland Defense: WMD in the US.
Water Management, Division of Water Supply and Geoscience, Water Systems Operations
Element, Lean Six Sigma-KAIZEN Event: Lead and Copper Rule: Notices of Action Level
Exceedance
On 16 and17, and 22-24 June, Chief Robinson, Green Belt trainee, facilitated the Lean Six
Sigma-KAIZEN Event for the Water Management, Division of Water Supply and Geoscience,
Water Systems Operations Element, Lead and Copper Rule: Notices of Action Level
Exceedance.
Contact: Arthur Robinson (609) 984-5634
B. REGISTRATION SECTION
Machine Source Registration and Renewal Fees
The Registration Section has begun invoicing the registrants for FY2021 registration renewals.
In addition, new equipment is invoiced administrative and prorated registration fees when they
are installed. The table below represents monthly and year to date activities.
Machine Source Fees Invoiced and Collected for FY 2021
Monthly
Invoiced
Monthly
Collected
Fiscal YTD
Invoiced
Fiscal YTD
Collected
Fiscal YTD
Adjustments
Percent
Collected
$14,381.00 $12,057.00 $3,080,501.00 $3,054,323.00 $2,830.00 99%
Page 3 of 43
Progress on Collection of FY 2021 Registration Renewal Fees
Renewal
Groups
Paid
7/31/20
Paid
8/31/20
Paid
9/30/20
Paid
10/31/20
Paid
11/30/20
Paid
12/31/20
Paid
1/31/21
Paid
2/28/21
Paid
3/31/21
Paid
4/30/21
Paid
5/31/21
Paid
6/30/21
0-F 37% 69% 86% 94% 96% 98% 99% 99% 100% 100% 100% 100%
G-L N/A 43% 73% 86% 95% 97% 97% 99% 99% 100% 100% 100%
M-R N/A N/A 43% 74% 86% 92% 96% 97% 98% 99% 100% 100%
S-Z N/A N/A N/A 30% 68% 86% 94% 97% 98% 99% 100% 100%
The Bureau of X-ray Compliance issued administrative orders to registrants who have failed to
pay their annual registration fees.
Of the total number of invoices paid to date, 25% percent paid on-line.
Monthly Machine Source Registration Activity FY 2021
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun YTD
New Facilities 13 20 14 25 17 11 11 8 15 12 19 24 189
Terminated
Facilities 29 30 37 46 31 34 41 29 37 21 22 17 374
Net Change
(Facilities) -16 -10 -23 -21 -14 -23 -30 -21 -22 -9 -3 7 -185
New Registrations 128 140 138 200 134 109 166 96 153 150 196 185 1795
Stored
Registrations 43 45 73 67 40 66 59 51 80 45 51 37 657
Disposed
registrations 94 99 75 87 80 67 87 60 93 93 91 75 1001
Net Change
(Machines) -9 -4 -10 46 14 -24 20 -15 -20 12 54 73 137
The Registration Section staff continues to collect registrant e-mail addresses and enter them into
the database in preparation for sending future notices and invoices electronically.
Contact: Lisa Brodbeck (609) 984-5370
C. MACHINE SOURCE SECTION
The machine source section is charged with the responsibility of inspecting all x-ray machines
used within the state. Below is a summary of the inspection initiatives that the section is
engaged in.
Page 4 of 43
Medical Diagnostic Quality Assurance Inspections
One initiative of the machine source section is the inspection of medical facilities that perform
diagnostic x-ray procedures to ensure that they have implemented a quality assurance program.
Department regulations require that each facility implement a program that includes the periodic
performance of quality control tests and in-depth annual equipment performance testing of its x-
ray equipment by Department certified medical physicists. The goal of the quality assurance
program is for facilities to ensure optimal operation of the x-ray equipment in order to achieve
high quality diagnostic x-ray images while simultaneously maintaining/reducing patient radiation
exposure to acceptable levels. As part of the Bureau’s inspections, image quality and patient
radiation exposure metrics are gathered and evaluated as an indicator of facility performance.
These measurables are reported to the facility along with the results of similar facilities
performing similar x-ray studies.
Image Quality
As part of the Bureau’s quality assurance inspection program, an x-ray image of our image
quality (IQ) phantom is taken and scored by the inspector in six criteria: background density,
high contrast resolution, noise and artifacts, density uniformity, low contrast detail and low
contrast resolution. Additionally, our database calculates an overall image quality score which is
reported to the facility.
A report is generated and sent to each facility at which an IQ film was done. This report
identifies which category (excellent, good, fair, or poor) each of the six tests and the overall
score the IQ falls into. The report explains IQ and its determining factors. Facilities with poor
IQ scores are asked to consult with their physicist and determine the cause of the poor IQ, take
corrective actions to improve IQ, and send a report of their findings and corrective actions to the
BXC within thirty days.
In June 2021, IQ evaluations were performed on 21 x-ray units with the following results:
• 15 units (71%) had excellent image quality scores.
• 6 units (29%) had good image quality scores.
• 0 units (0%) had fair image quality scores.
• 0 units (0%) had poor image quality scores.
Entrance Skin Exposures
Entrance skin exposure (ESE) is a measurement of the radiation exposure a patient receives from
a single x-ray at skin surface. There are three main factors that affect ESE: technique factors,
film-screen or digital image receptor speed, and film or digital image processing. A key element
of our strategy is to ensure that facilities are aware of their ESE and to encourage them to take
steps to reduce their ESE if it is high.
When the Bureau conducts inspections to determine compliance with New Jersey Administrative
Code 7:28, a measurement of entrance skin exposure (ESE) is taken. A report containing the
Page 5 of 43
measurement results is sent to each facility at which an ESE measurement was taken. This
report categorizes the facilities measured ESE as low, average, high or extremely high. Facilities
with extremely high ESE readings are asked to consult with their physicist and determine the
cause of the extremely high ESE, take corrective actions to reduce the x-ray machine ESE, and
send a report of their findings and corrective actions to the BXC within thirty days.
Medical Facilities
Prior to the implementation of quality assurance regulations in June 2001, baseline data
revealed that twenty-five percent of New Jersey facilities had extremely high ESE. These
facilities are delivering unnecessary radiation exposure to its patients. The Bureau has
documented a steady decrease in the number of facilities with extremely high patient radiation
exposure since the implementation of its quality assurance program.
Radiographic ESE Ranges in Milliroentgens (mR)
Exam Low Average High Extremely
High
Chest < 5 5 to 20 21 to 30 > 31
LS Spine < 100 100 to 450 451 to 600 > 601
Foot < 5 5 to 30 31 to 40 > 41
• In June 2021, ESE measurements were calculated on twelve x-ray units that performed
lumbo-sacral spine x-rays. Zero units (0%) had extremely high ESE measurements.
• In June 2021, ESE measurements were calculated on zero x-ray units that performed
chest x-rays. Zero units (0%) had extremely high ESE measurements.
• In June 2021, ESE measurements were calculated on nine x-ray units that performed foot
x-rays. Zero units (0%) had extremely high ESE measurements.
Dental Facilities
Dental facilities use two types of digital imaging: direct radiography (DR) or computed
radiology (CR); also, referred to as phosphor storage plates (PSP). Dental facilities also use two
speeds of film: D and E/F or Insight. (Insight is the branded name of Kodak’s F speed film). D is
the slowest speed and requires sixty percent more radiation than E/F or F to produce an
acceptable image. Direct radiography requires the least radiation.
An analysis of the historical data from May to December 2015, the Bureau inspected two
thousand eight hundred and twenty-one (2,821) intra oral dental units. Eighty one percent (81%)
of all dental facilities evaluated in 2015 were using digital imaging systems. This percentage
breaks down to seventy three percent (73%) used DR and eight percent (8%) used CR (PSP).
Only nineteen percent (19%) of all dental facilities evaluated in 2015 were using film-based
imaging. This percentage breaks down to twelve (12%) used D speed film and seven percent
(7%) used E/F or F speed film.
Page 6 of 43
An inexpensive way to reduce radiation is to change to a faster speed film. Our research
determined that E/F or F speed film costs only a few cents more per film then D speed. No
changes in equipment or processing are necessary to use a faster speed film.
When the Bureau conducts inspections to determine compliance with New Jersey Administrative
Code 7:28, a measurement of entrance skin exposure (ESE) is taken. The Bureau collected
baseline ESE data on dental x-ray machines for the years 2008 and 2009. This data was
evaluated to establish the ranges for four ESE categories similar to those in the medical quality
assurance program (low, average, high and extremely high). A report is generated and sent to
each facility at which an ESE measurement was taken. This report gives the ESE and identifies
which category the ESE falls into. The report explains ESE and its determining factors.
Facilities with extremely high ESE readings are asked to consult with their digital or film
representative or physicist and determine the cause of the extremely high ESE, make changes to
reduce ESE, and send a report of their findings and corrective actions to the BXC within thirty
days. The table below depicts the current ESE ranges for the various imaging systems used.
Dental ESE Ranges Measured in Milliroentgens (mR)
Image
Receptor Low Average High
Extremely
High
Digital (DR) 0 to 20 21 to 110 111 to 160 ≥161
CR (PSP) 0 to 35 36 to 170 171 to 215 ≥216
Film Speed
D 0 to100 101 to 285 286 to 350 ≥351
E/F,F, Insight 0 to 50 51 to 150 151 to 205 ≥206
• In June 2021, ESE measurements were calculated on 224 dental x-ray units that used DR
digital imaging. Eleven units (5%) were measured as having extremely high ESE.
• In June 2021, ESE measurements were calculated on 30 dental x-ray units that used CR
(PSP) digital imaging. Five units (17%) were measured as having extremely high ESE.
• In June 2021, ESE measurements were calculated on 9 dental x-ray units that used D
speed film. Zero units (0%) were measured as having extremely high ESE.
• In June 2021, ESE measurements were calculated on 10 dental x-ray units that used E/F,
F, or Insight speed film. Zero units (0%) were measured as having extremely high ESE.
Dental Amalgam Inspections
Effective November 1, 2009, all dental facilities that generate amalgam waste were required to
install amalgam separators (N.J.A.C. 7:14A-1 et seq.). In June 2010, the Bureau met with
Division of Water Quality staff to discuss the dental amalgam requirements and to develop an
amalgam questionnaire. This questionnaire would be provided to each dental facility when they
are scheduled for an x-ray inspection. During each inspection, the inspector verifies the
Page 7 of 43
information on the questionnaire and visually inspects that an amalgam separator has been
installed. In June 2021, 103 amalgam questionnaires were collected. The total dental amalgam
questionnaires collected for FY2021 is 937.
Inspection Activity and Items of Non-compliance
A two-page Inspector Activity Report of inspections performed, enforcement documents issued,
and a description of the non-compliances found follows in Appendix A of this report.
Contact: Rachel McVeigh (609) 984-5370
D. TECHNOLOGIST EDUCATION AND LICENSING SECTION
The Section continued to process license and examination applications investigate complaints
and respond to inquiries during the month of June. Statistical information follows in Appendix
A of this report. In addition to its regular business functions, the following highlights are
reported:
Technologist Education and Licensing Section (Fees)
The Section continues to invoice individuals for initial licenses and examinations as applications
are received or license renewal requests are made. The table below represents monthly and fiscal
year-to-date billing and revenue activities.
Technologist Education & Licensing Section
FY 2021 Invoiced & Collected
Invoice Type Monthly
Invoiced
Monthly
Collected
Fiscal YTD
Invoiced
Fiscal YTD
Collected
Examinations $0 $160 $480 $480
Initial Licenses $7,380 $6,000 $68,220 $67,000
Renewal Licenses $540 $4,320 $2,124,270 $1,847,880
Totals $7,920 $10,480 $2,192,970 $1,915,360
Contact: Al Orlandi (609) 984-5890
E. MAMMOGRAPHY SECTION
Stereotactic Facilities Inspected
The Mammography Section inspected three facilities with stereotactic/needle localization breast
biopsy unit during the month of June. A total of 34 of the 61 planned stereotactic facility
inspections have been performed since July 1, 2020.
Page 8 of 43
Mammography Facilities Inspected
Mammography facilities are inspected by the Bureau’s FDA certified MQSA inspectors under
the Mammography Quality Standards Act (MQSA). Any areas of non-compliance discovered
during MQSA facility inspections are classified into one of two categories: Level 1 and Level 2.
Level 1 and Repeat Level 2 non-compliances are the most serious and the facility has fifteen
days from the date of the inspection to respond to the FDA detailing the corrective actions they
have taken. Level 2 non-compliances are considered serious. The facility must respond with
their corrective actions within thirty days.
The Mammography Section inspected 24 facilities in June. A total of 209 of the 234 facilities
scheduled to be inspected under the contract that will expire on August 20, 2021. There were no
facilities found to have non-compliance issues.
Facility Non-compliance Discovered
• There were no facilities with a Level 1 and Level 2 Repeat non-compliances.
• There was one facility with Level 2 non-compliances.
• There was no documentation of 8 hours of training for the radiologic technologist in each
mammographic modality for which mammograms were performed.
Contact: Mary Kanewski (609) 984-5370
F. BUREAU ENFORCEMENT SERVICES SECTION
Enforcement Actions for June 2021
Bureau Enforcement is responsible for producing and following up on all enforcement actions
for violations found during Bureau x-ray inspections. Since the Bureau has not yet been fully
integrated into the Departments NJEMS database system, it enters summary inspection
information into NJEMS on all inspections conducted by the Bureau to provide more accurate
inspection numbers for the Department’s NJEMS reports. See the table below for current month
and year to date information.
Page 9 of 43
Inspections and Enforcement Documents Issued
June 2021
Bureau of X-Ray Compliance
Month YTD
Compliance Inspections
entered into NJEMS 26 242
Dental/CBCT
Inspections entered into
NJEMS
104 825
Notice of
Violations
Closed Effective Pending Total YTD
6 2 6 14 101
Administrative
Orders
Closed Effective Pending Total YTD
0 0 12 12 140
Notice of
Prosecutions
Closed Effective Pending Total YTD
0 0 12 12 125
Amount
Assessed in
Penalties
Amount
Assessed
for Month
Total
amount
assessed
for FY
Amount
Collected
from
current FY
Amount
Collected
from
previous
FY
Total
amount
collected
$7,200.00 $70,050.00 $58,850.00 $16,600.00 $75,450.00
Contact: Ramona Chambus (609) 984-5370
Page 10 of 43
APPENDIX A - NJDEP BUREAU OF X-RAY COMPLIANCE INSPECTOR ACTIVITY REPORT 06/01/2021 THROUGH 06/30/2021
Inspector: ALL
07/01/2021
Discipline: ALL
Page 1 of 3
132 346
1
9
11
12
15
28
Inspection Type
ROUTINE INSPECTION
HAND DELIVERY
INVESTIGATION
STEREOTACTIC INSPECTION
QA INSPECTION ROUTINE LEVEL 1
DENTAL CBCT INSPECTION
Inspection Description
88
1
5
3
25
10
Facilities Inspected
279
3
21
43
Total On-Site Inspections:
NOV
AO
NOP
Amount of Penalties
14
12
14
$7,250
Number of Inspections Performed
Number of Enforcement Documents Issued
6
18
23
30
OFFICE VIOLATION RESPONSE REVIEW
OFFICE QA VIOLATION RESPONSE REVIEW
OFFICE TECH CERT INSPECTION
DENTAL CBCT OFFICE REVIEW INSPECTION
10
25
5
3
11
25
5
3
Machines Inspected
Total Office Inspections: 43 44
17
Machines Audited
17
4
3
4
Machines Uninspected
17 28
0
Page 11 of 43
APPENDIX A - NJDEP BUREAU OF X-RAY COMPLIANCE INSPECTOR ACTIVITY REPORT 06/01/2021 THROUGH 06/30/2021
Inspector: ALL
07/01/2021
Discipline: ALL
Page 2 of 3
CB-001
CB-003
D-002
D-003
D-016
D-022
G-007
REG1
S-001
TC-001
QA-011
QA-012
QA-037
QA-174
No Alternate QA program for CBCT
CBCT No MPQCS
Survey of environs not available or not performed.
Survey not available upon relocation or changes to shielding.
kVp exceeds manufacturer's specifications (certified unit).
Signal audible to operator indicating termination of exposure not provided for certified units.
device not working properly.
Failed to register the ionizing radiation producing machine within 30 days of acquisition.
Radiation survey inside and outside controlled area not performed by a qualified individual.
x-rayed humans without a valid NJ license.
QC tests from Table 1 (Radiographic) not performed at the required intervals.
Medical Physicist's QC Survey not performed at required interval or all tests not performed.
QC tests from Table 2 (Fluoroscopic) not performed at the required intervals.
All images for QC tests for items 8, 11, 12 & 13 maintained for 1 year.
CB
Dental
G
Registration
S
TC
Quality Assurance
Violations Cited Non-QA
Violations Cited QA
Violation Code Description Non-Compliance
Number of Violations
Total Violations Cited Non-QA
Total Violations Cited QA
22
14
22.3(i)
22.7(a)3
16.8(a)1
16.8(a)2
16.3(a)7
16.3(a)13
2.5(c)
3.1 (a) and (b)
7.1(a)
19.3(c)
22.5(a)2
22.5(a)3
22.6(a)2
22.5(j)3
Glossary Information By Code
4
4
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
5
7
2
3
2
Page 12 of 43
APPENDIX A - NJDEP BUREAU OF X-RAY COMPLIANCE INSPECTOR ACTIVITY REPORT 06/01/2021 THROUGH 06/30/2021
Inspector: ALL
07/01/2021
Discipline: ALL
Page 3 of 3
Violation Code Description Non-Compliance
Number of Violations
Total Violations 36
Glossary Information By Code
Page 13 of 43
APPENDIX A - TECHNOLOGIST EDUCATION AND LICENSING SECTION
MONTH OF JUNE 2021
License Category
Diagnostic Rad
Nuc Med
Rad Therapy
Dental Rad
Chest Rad
Podiatric Rad
Orthopedic Rad
Fusion Imaging
CT
Monthly Total
FY to Date
FY Projected
Initial Licenses Processed
36 5 2 54 - - - 1 98 1,102 1,100
Licenses Renewed 18 1 2 27 - 1 - - 49 20,457 N/A
Total Licensed 8,830 913 797 10,853 48 16 5 81 21,543 N/A N/A Exams Scheduled - - - - - - - - 0 0 N/A
Investigations Conducted 1 - - 2 - - - - 3 30 30
Licenses Verified 383 - 3 410 - - - - 796 6,493 7,000
Expired Licenses - - - - - - - - 0 3 N/A
Unlicensed
- - - - - - - - 0 15 N/A
Enforcement Documents Issued
- - - - - - - - 0 72 N/A
NEAs Issued - - - - - - - - 0 0 N/A
Offer of Settlement - - - - - - - - $0 $20,150 N/A
Licenses Sanctioned 1 - - - - - - - 1 5 N/A
Approved Educational Schools
15 2 3 23 - - - - 43 43 N/A
New School Application Evaluated
1 - - 1 - - - - 2 8 8
Curriculum Modifications Evaluated
- - - - - - - - 0 15 20
School Inspections Conducted
- - - - - - - - 0 0 7
Total Schools Reviewed - - - - - - - - 2 23 27
Clinical Applications Approved
- - - 101 - - - - 101 1,175 1,100
Page 14 of 43
Appendix A - Bureau of X-ray Compliance Mammography Section
June 2021
Type of Facility
IND
UST
RY
PHY
SIC
IAN
HO
SPIT
AL
GO
VE
RN
ME
NT
TOTAL MONTH
FY TO DATE
TOTAL DUE
THIS FY
MQSA Facilities Inspected 0 15 9 0 24 209 234 Machines Inspected 0 24 17 0 41 307
FDA Violations Level 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 FDA Violations Level 2 0 1 0 0 1 11
Registered 0 4 0 0 4 37 Canceled 0 2 0 0 2 38
Stereotactic Facilities Inspected 0 2 1 0 3 34 61 Machines Inspected 0 2 1 0 3 37 Notice of Violation 0 0 0 0 0 0
Administrative Order 0 0 0 0 0 0 Notice of Prosecution 0 0 0 0 0 0
Registered 0 0 0 0 0 3 Canceled 0 0 0 0 0 6
Page 15 of 43
SECTION III - BUREAU OF ENVIRONMENTAL RADIATION (BER)
A. OFFICE OF THE BUREAU CHIEF
The Integrated Materials Performance Evaluation Program (IMPEP) is the mechanism by which
the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) ensures that Agreement States and the NRC are
adequate to protect the public health and safety, and compatible with the NRC regulations. The
IMPEP process employs a team of Agreement State and NRC staff to assess both Agreement
State and NRC radiation control licensing and inspection programs. Agreement State members
must be fully qualified and complete special IMPEP training to be selected to participate in
another state or NRC IMPEP. Karen Flanigan participated in the New Hampshire IMPEP in
April. This month, Nancy Stanley participated in the NRC’s IMPEP. The NRC staff perform
inspection and licensing of radioactive materials in states that do not have an Agreement.
Traditionally, each Region of the NRC and Headquarters have a separate IMPEP. This year, the
review of the NRC Materials Program was a consolidated review of the entire program at one
time. This included the three Regional Offices (Regions I, III, and IV) and the sealed source and
device evaluation and uranium recovery programs in NMSS (NRC headquarters). Along with
Karen and Nancy, Jack Tway is also trained to perform IMPEPs. This demonstrates New
Jersey’s continued commitment to the National Materials Program.
B. RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS PROGRAM
Medical, Industrial, and Reciprocity
During the month of June 2021, the Radioactive Materials Program responded to (4) radiation
incidents:
Date Type of
Incident
Description Status
6/8/21 Scrap A load of scrap from NH set off the radiation
monitors at a scrap facility in NJ. The load was
rejected and returned to its origin in NH.
Closed
6/9/21 Scrap An item brought in by a local police department
triggered the radiation monitors at a scrap facility in
NJ. It was identified as containing Ra-226. The item
has been secured, safely stored, and is awaiting
proper disposal.
Pending
6/16/21 Other A resident in Morris County brought a shielded
container he said contained U-238 fuel pellets to the
local PD, who then called the Morris County Hazmat
team. This person had spent part of his career
working in the nuclear industry. BER staff, along
with the Morris County Hazmat responders, went to
his home to perform surveys and ensure that the
Pending
Page 16 of 43
material is safe, and properly stored while disposal
options are explored.
6/16/21 Other A separate resident in Morris County contacted the
county Hazmat team regarding an item he found
while cleaning out a deceased relative’s house. BER
staff, along with the Morris County Hazmat
responders, also went to his home to perform surveys
and ensure that the material is safe, and properly
stored while disposal options are explored. The
material in question appeared to be slate-like and was
found to contain Ra-226.
Pending
Contact: Nancy Stanley (609) 984-5452
C. ROUTINE ACTIVITIES
This Month
6/1/21-6/30/21
FY-To-Date
7/1/20-6/30/21
Number of Amendments Processed 26 190
Number of Renewals Processed 0 50
Number of Initial Applications Processed 0 6
Number of Active Licenses 563 563
Number of Terminations 5 19
Number of Reciprocity Requests Received 31 298
Number of Incidents 6 39
Number of Inspections 4 70
Contact: Debbie Wenke (609) 984-5509 or Jack Tway (609) 984-5514
General Licensing
Reconciliation of the Generally Licensed and Tritium Databases that were inherited from the
NRC in 2009 continues. No source on the databases was verified during June.
Staff continues to maintain entry of quarterly reports from manufacturers and distributors into
the generally licensed database. No reports were received reflecting quarterly transactions.
Generally Licensed Device Registration Forms continue to be maintained. A total of 49
registrations are currently active.
Contact: Sarah Sanderlin (609) 984-5466
Page 17 of 43
D. SUMMARY OF ENFORCEMENT – JUNE 2021
Bureau of Environmental Radiation – By Month
(6/1/2021 - 6/30/2021)
Administrative
Orders
Closed Effective Pending Total
Radioactive
Materials Section
1
1
0
2
Radon Section 0 0 4 4
Notice of
Prosecution
Closed Effective Pending Total
Radioactive
Materials Section
0
0
0
0
Radon Section 0 0 1 1
Notice of
Violations
Closed Effective Pending Total
Radioactive
Materials Section
0
1
1
2
Radon Section 0 0 2 2
Bureau of Environmental Radiation – Fiscal Year to Date
7/1/2020 - 6/30/2021
Administrative
Orders
Closed
Effective
Pending
Total
Radioactive
Materials Section
2
2
0
4
Radon Section 0 0 4 4
Notice of
Prosecution
Closed Effective Pending Total
Radioactive
Materials Section
0
0
0
0
Radon Section 0 0 1 1
Notice of
Violations
Closed Effective Pending Total
Radioactive
Materials Section
1
4
1
6
Radon Section 0 0 2 2
Page 18 of 43
Amount Assessed in Penalties = FY
Total Amount
Assessed for
FY21
Amount
Collected from
Current FY21
Amount Collected
from FY20
Total Amount
Collected
(FY20+FY21)
Radioactive
Materials Section
$0.00
$0.00
$3,750.00
$3,750.00
Radon Section $400.00 $400.00 $0.00 $0.00
Amount Assessed in Penalties = By Month
Total Amount Assessed for
6/1/2021 - 6/30/2021
Amount Collected from
6/1/2021 - 6/30/2021
Radioactive
Materials Section
$0.00
$0.00
Radon Section $400.00 $0.00
Contact: Nancy Stanley (609) 984-5452 or Anita Kopera (609) 984-5543
E. RADIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SECTION (REAS)
Water Treatment
There are currently 23 active specific licenses for water treatment systems. Staff completed
review of 9 routine submittals of dosimetry/discharge data per specific license conditions.
There are currently 18 active general license registrations for water treatment systems (13 radium
systems and 5 uranium systems).
Contact: Joseph Power (609) 777-4252
Decommissioning and Contaminated Site Reviews
Staff completed review of 6 technical reports/referrals. A brief compliance inspection and site
visit was conducted at the National Lead and Kintock sites. Staff worked on the following
sites/projects:
• Heritage Minerals site in Manchester
• Howmet Site in Dover
• Maywood FUSRAP Site
• Middlesex Sampling Plant FUSRAP site
• National Lead site in Sayreville
• Pantasote site in Passaic
• PSE&G Hudson Generating Station
Contacts: James McCullough (609) 984-5480 or Joseph Power (609) 777-4252
Page 19 of 43
Historic Non-Military Radium Project
Staff performed surveys at one historic radium company in Newark and are awaiting sample
analytical results. U.S. EPA is planning to implement remedial actions at one site identified
previously through this effort.
Contacts: James McCullough (609) 984-5480 or Jenny Goodman (609) 984-5400
F. RADON SECTION
Radon Rule
The public comment period closed on June 5, 2021. Comments are being organized and
responses prepared.
Contact: Anita Kopera (609) 984-5543 or Charles Renaud (609) 984-5423
Electrets
Four electrets were mailed out as part of the post-mitigation testing program. Two other electrets
were returned from one of the homeowners from last month. They were analyzed and the
homeowner was notified appropriately.
Contact: Charles Renaud (609) 984-5423
CRCPD E-25 Conference Planning
Staff has worked with the E-25 Committee to plan this year’s national radon conference. The
venue has been secured and the event will be held in Rockville Maryland this October. Members
have been reaching out to industry leaders to speak at the conference and an event schedule has
been drafted.
Contact: Brian Giancola (609) 984-5434
Measurement and Mitigation Radon Certifications
Certification Type Initial Renewal
MES 1 3
MET 14 72
MIS 6
MIT 2
MEB 1
MIB 2
Contact: Maxine Williams (609) 984-5628
Page 20 of 43
APPENDIX B: BUREAU OF ENVIRONMENTAL RADIATION SUMMARY OF STATISTICS
Page 21 of 43
Page 22 of 43
Radon testing and mitigation data is submitted to the Radon Section monthly by all certified radon businesses. This data has been collected for all building types since the implementation of the radon certification regulations in 1991. According to N.J.A.C. 7:28-27.28 (a) and (e), Radon test results and mitigation reports for April 2021 are due by June 1, 2021.
Page 23 of 43
Page 24 of 43
SECTION IV – BUREAU OF NUCLEAR ENGINEERING (BNE)
A. OFFICE OF THE BUREAU CHIEF
Significant Events
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, staff have been working from home since March 16th, 2020.
B. NUCLEAR ENGINEERING SECTION
Oyster Creek – Permanently Shutdown
Exelon permanently ceased power operations at Oyster Creek on September 17th, 2018. Oyster
Creek immediately began the process of defueling the reactor which was completed on
September 25th, 2018. Following defueling completion, Exelon provided certifications to the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) of permanent cessation of power operations and
permanent removal of fuel from the reactor. Oyster Creek is currently in the DECON mode of
decommissioning.
On August 31, 2018, Exelon Generation and Holtec International submitted a License Transfer
Application (LTA) to the NRC. The NRC completed its review of the LTA and found that
Holtec is suitable and qualified to complete the safe decommissioning of Oyster Creek. The
NRC approved the LTA on June 20, 2019.
On July 1, 2019, Holtec International and its subsidiaries announced the ownership and
acquisition of Oyster Creek. Oyster Creek Environmental Protection (OCEP) is the licensed
owner of Oyster Creek. Holtec Decommissioning International (HDI) is the licensed
decommissioning operator. HDI has contracted Comprehensive Decommissioning International
(CDI) to manage and perform day-to-day decommissioning activities at Oyster Creek.
Decommissioning Projects:
Removal and segmentation of the reactor vessel head heat shield, reactor vessel head, drywell
head and the drywell concrete shield plugs have been completed. Segmentation of the reactor
vessel internals has commenced. Segmentation of the reactor steam dryer and steam separator is
complete. Packaging of the steam separator into different containers is complete. Phase 1 of the
reactor vessel internals is complete. Segmentation of the top guide tubes is complete. CDI has
completed the removal of the reactor vessel internal piping. CDI is currently working on
segmentation of the upper shroud.
After CDI withdrew the construction permit application from Lacey Township for the expansion
of the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) concrete pad, the dry runs to
demonstrate the spent fuel loading/transfer operations of the dry storage system were completed
in December 2020. On December 14, 2020, Oyster Creek began its final spent fuel dry cask
storage campaign. The campaign consisted of loading spent nuclear fuel from the Oyster Creek
spent fuel pool into multi-purpose canisters, installing the canisters into dry cask storage casks,
Page 25 of 43
and transporting the casks to the ISFSI. On May 21, 2021, the last dry spent fuel storage cask
was placed on the independent spent fuel storage pad, which safely completed Oyster Creek’s
final spent fuel campaign. Oyster Creek loaded and placed a total of 33 casks on the independent
spent fuel storage pad in 21 weeks, thus setting a world record by completing the fastest transfer
of all spent nuclear fuel from a plant’s spent fuel pool to its dry storage facility. All of Oyster
Creek’s spent fuel assemblies are now safely stored in robust dry storage casks at the ISFSI
awaiting transport to either an interim storage or permanent disposal location.
Three outer buildings (not located in the radiological controlled area) have been demolished and
removed from the site. Eight power transformers have been removed from the site. All reactor
control rod hydraulic control units (HCU) and associated components have been dismantled.
The original site water tank and a demineralized water storage tank have been dismantled and
shipped offsite. A lube oil tank has also been removed and transported offsite. Demolition of
the old north guard house, the abandoned torus water storage tank, the new maintenance building
and the radwaste surge tank is complete. CDI is currently working on demolition of the
augmented off gas building.
Contact: Veena Gubbi (609) 984-7457
BNE Activities at Oyster Creek
One (1) NES Engineer was onsite on June 3rd and June 29th to discuss decommissioning
activities with CDI personnel.
Contact: Veena Gubbi (609) 984-7457
Hope Creek
Hope Creek began the month operating at 100% power. On June 11th, power was reduced to
~90% to repair a main condenser tube leak. Power was returned to 100% on June 13th. On June
16th, a reactor feedwater pump unexpectedly tripped causing reactor power to automatically
decrease to 69%. The cause of the trip was determined/repaired, and power was returned to
100% later in the day. On June 27th, PSEG made the conservative decision to conduct a
maintenance outage to replace a main steam relief valve pilot valve that was leaking. Following
completion of the maintenance work, Hope Creek synchronized the main generator to the offsite
electrical grid on June 30th and then began power ascension with 100% power expected to occur
on July 2nd.
In addition to the above, Hope Creek decreased power for brief periods in June to perform
reactor control rod pattern adjustments. During these periods, power remained in the ~90% to
~97% range.
Contact: Jacob Fakory (609) 984-7458 or Jerry Humphreys (609) 984-7469
Page 26 of 43
Salem Unit 1
Salem Unit 1 ran at essentially full power throughout June except for a brief period on June 4th
when power was reduced to ~89.5% for main turbine valve testing.
Contact: Elliot Rosenfeld (609) 984-7548
Salem Unit 2
Salem Unit 2 ran at essentially full power throughout June.
Contact: Elliot Rosenfeld (609) 984-7548
BNE Activities at Artificial Island
During the maintenance outage at Hope Creek, one (1) NES Engineer and the NES Supervisor
attended the daily 0630 and 1430 virtual Outage Control Center (OCC) briefings to maintain
awareness of outage activities.
Contact: Jacob Fakory (609) 984-7458 or Jerry Humphreys (609) 984-7469
On June 29th, ten (10) DEP employees participated in a virtual meeting with PSEG Nuclear
management. Among the items discussed were the operating history of the three units; the
results of the 27th refueling outage at Salem 1; the results of the 23rd refueling outage at Hope
Creek; the scope of the upcoming 25th refueling outage at Salem 2; feedback from the BPU
concerning the ISFSI/Spent Fuel Study; and the status of COVID protocols and success/failure.
Contact: Elliot Rosenfeld (609) 984-7548
NES Maintains Contact with PSEG, Holtec, NRC and NJ State Management While
Working Remotely
As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, NES staff have been working remotely from home.
NES staff have been actively in telephone and email contact with the PSEG management (Salem
& Hope Creek) and Holtec management (Oyster Creek) to discuss activities at the individual
stations.
The NES staff has also been in contact with the NRC Resident inspectors to determine if the
NRC has any concerns about the stations.
If any events or concerns would occur, the NES staff would be available to visit the stations
while maintaining COVID-19 protocol.
NES has established a process with station management to maintain site access qualification at
the stations. Access to operating information via remote access has also been maintained.
Page 27 of 43
The NES staff meets daily via Microsoft Team video chat in order to ensure that the staff is fully
informed of station status and work assignments for the section.
The NES staff has also attended, via video, the weekly updates from the DEP Commissioner.
Contact: Jerry Humphreys (609) 984-7469
NRC Performs Inspection of PSEG’s Implementation of the 10 CFR 50.59 Process at Salem
During the week of June 14th, the NRC performed an inspection of the 10 CFR 50.59 Process at
Salem. The inspection followed NRC Inspection Procedure 71111.17T, “Evaluations of
Changes Tests and Experiments”. The inspection monitored the effectiveness of PSEG’s
implementation of changes to Salem’s structures, systems and components; risk significant
normal and emergency operating procedures; test programs; and the updated final safety analysis
report (UFSAR) in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.59. The inspection provided
assurance that required license amendments have been obtained. The results of the inspection
will be included in the NRC Third Quarter 2021 Integrated Inspection Report for Salem (2021-
003).
One (1) NES Engineer observed the inspection virtually.
Contact: Elliot Rosenfeld (609) 984-7548
NRC Performs Radioactive Solid Waste Processing and Radioactive Material Handling,
Storage, and Transportation Inspection at Hope Creek
On June 14th thru 19th, the NRC performed a Radioactive Solid Waste Processing and
Radioactive Material Handling, Storage, and Transportation Inspection at Hope Creek in
accordance with NRC Inspection Procedure 71124, Attachment 8. The inspection assessed the
effectiveness of PSEG’s programs for processing, handling, storage, and transportation of
radioactive material. In addition, a routine review of problem identification and resolution
activities per NRC Inspection Procedure 71152, “Problem Identification and Resolution” was
made.
One (1) NES engineer observed the inspection virtually.
Contact: Jacob Fakory (609) 984-7458
NES Staff Attends NRC Teleconferences/Webinars while Working Remotely
1. NRC Annual Performance Assessment at Salem Units 1 and 2 and Hope Creek Nuclear
Generating Stations
The NRC completed its 2020 performance assessment of Salem and Hope Creek and
provided its assessment in letters to PSEG dated March 3rd. The NRC determined the
performance at Salem and Hope Creek was within the Licensee Response Column of the
Page 28 of 43
Reactor Oversight Process (RPO) because all inspection findings had very low safety
significance (i.e., Green), and all Performance Indicators (PI) were within the expected
range (i.e., Green). A plant in the Licensee Response Column requires the least amount of
NRC oversight.
On June 16th, the NRC hosted a public webinar to present its assessment of the safety
performance of ten (10) nuclear generating stations in NRC Region I, including Salem
and Hope Creek. The NRC provided background concerning the ROP and the inspection
activities and other information that the ROP uses to assess the performance of a nuclear
generating station. The NRC’s COVID response for onsite inspection activities and
licensing activities during 2020 was discussed. The NRC’s 2020 assessment of the
performance of each station was presented by either the NRC Senior Resident or
Resident Inspector for that site.
Two (2) NES Engineers and the NES Supervisor attended the webinar.
Contact: Jerry Humphreys (609) 984-7469
2. Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) – Meeting of the Subcommittee on
Metallurgy & Reactor Fuels and the Subcommittee on Radiation Protection & Nuclear
Fuels to Discuss Regulatory Guide 3.76 “Implementation of Aging Management
Requirements for Spent Fuel Storage Renewals”
The ACRS is independent of the NRC staff and reports directly to the NRC Commission.
One of the functions of the ACRS is to review and report on safety studies and reactor
facility licenses. On June 23rd, two ACRS subcommittees held a teleconference to
discuss proposed draft Regulatory Guide (RG) 3.76, “Implementation of Aging
Management Requirements for Spent Fuel Storage Renewals”. RG 3.76 describes an
approach that is acceptable to the NRC staff for format and content for renewals of
licenses for Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations (ISFSIs) and implementation of
Aging Management Programs (AMPs). A representative from Nuclear Energy Institute
(NEI) provided an overview on the guidance in NEI 14-03, “Format, Content and
Implementation Guidance for Dry Cask Storage Operations-Based Aging Management.”
The NRC staff provided the panel an overview on the draft RG 3.76. Following the NRC
presentation, the subcommittees’ questions/concerns were addressed by the NEI and
NRC presenters.
Three (3) NES Engineers and the NES Supervisor attended the teleconference.
Contact: Veena Gubbi (609) 984-7457
NES Staff Attends Department of Energy (DOE) National Transportation Stakeholders
Forum (NTSF) Teleconferences/Webinars
The DOE NTSF is the mechanism through which DOE communicates at a national level with
states and tribes about the DOE’s shipments of radioactive waste and materials. The purpose of
Page 29 of 43
the NTSF is to bring transparency, openness, and accountability to DOE’s transportation
activities through collaboration with state and tribal governments. The NTSF informs states and
tribes about ongoing, upcoming, or tentatively planned DOE shipments or shipping campaigns
that may have an impact on their jurisdictions. It also allows the DOE to obtain input from states
and tribes about concerns, needs, or logistics that are relevant to shipment planning and
execution. Additionally, the NTSF can identify emerging issues for DOE and its transportation
stakeholders that may affect shipment planning, preparedness, and execution, including
intergovernmental consultation and cooperation.
1. NTSF Webinar to Discuss the Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program (NNPP)
On June 2nd, the NTSF held a webinar to discuss the Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program
(NNPP) (also known as Naval Reactors). Naval Reactor representatives provided
overviews of the NNPP; NNPP container rail shipments; the Navy's spent nuclear fuel
(SNF) shipments, including its shipment practices and accident exercises. The
representatives also shared their recent experience with heavy-haul shipments of SNF in
support of refueling the program's land-based prototype reactor in West Milton, NY.
Three (3) NES Engineers and the NES Supervisor attended the webinar.
Contact: Veena Gubbi (609) 984-7457
2. Midwestern Radioactive Materials Transportation Committee (MRMTC) Meeting
Due to COVID-19 concerns, MRMTC held a virtual meeting on June 14th in place of its
normal spring meeting. Participating in this meeting were members and/or
representatives of MRMTC, Tribal Radioactive Materials Transportation Committee
(TRMTC), DOE Office of Environmental Management, DOE Office of Nuclear Energy
and the other three State Regional Groups (SRGs: Northeast, Southern, Western). The
representatives from the DOE provided an update on DOE activities for 2021; the railcar
development program; intergovernmental engagement; and the Transportation
Emergency Preparedness Program (TEPP) training sessions. A representative from
DOE’s Waste Isolation Pilot Project (WIPP) presented an update of activities at the
DOE’s WIPP burial site in New Mexico for the nation's defense-related and research-
related transuranic (TRU) waste. The representatives from the TRMTC provided an
update on the Tribal activities. The representatives from the midwestern states provided
an update on the ongoing activities in their states. Representatives of the other three
SRGs provided brief updates of the activities of their respective groups.
One (1) NES Engineer and the NES Supervisor attended the virtual meeting.
Contact: Veena Gubbi (609) 984-7457
3. Tribal Radioactive Materials Transportation Committee (TRMTC) Meeting
Page 30 of 43
On June 15th, TRMTC held a virtual meeting. Participating, among others, were
members and/or representatives of TRMTC, DOE Office of Environmental Management,
DOE Office of Nuclear Energy (NE), Department of Transportation (DOT), the Federal
Railroad Administration (FRA) and the four SRGs. The representatives from the DOE
provided an update on DOE activities for 2021; the railcar development program;
intergovernmental engagement; and the Transportation Emergency Preparedness
Program (TEPP) training sessions. A representative from WIPP presented an update of
activities at the WIPP DOE burial site for DOE generated radwaste located in New
Mexico. The representatives from the TRMTC provided an update on the Tribal
activities. Representatives of the four SRGs provided brief updates of the activities of
their respective groups. The DOT and FRA provided a joint discussion presentation on
the Tribal Affairs Office and Tribal Consultation Plan of Action. The FRA presented an
update on the Draft Safety Compliance Oversight Plan.
The NES Supervisor attended the virtual meeting.
Contact: Jerry Humphreys (609) 984-7469
4. Western Interstate Energy Board (WIEB) High-Level Radioactive Waste (HLRW)
Committee Meeting
Due to COVID-19 concerns, WIEB held a virtual meeting on June 16th in place of its
normal spring meeting. Participating in this meeting were members and/or
representatives of WIEB, TRMTC, DOE Office of Environmental Management, DOE
Office of Nuclear Energy and the other three SRGs. The representatives from Nevada
Agency for Nuclear Projects, the Nuclear Decommissioning Collaborative and Williams
College seniors presented their perspectives on the consent-based siting for storage or
disposal of spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste. A representative from
California Energy Commission provided a brief overview on the various plans that
Southern California Edison recently put forward on the “Relocation of San Onofre
Nuclear Generating Station Spent Nuclear Fuel to an Offsite Storage Facility or a
Repository”. A WIEB representative provided an update on the activities of the HLRW
Committee and WIEB activities. The representatives from the western states provided an
update on the ongoing activities in their states. Representatives of the other three SRGs
provided brief updates of the activities of their respective groups.
One (1) NES Engineer and the NES Supervisor attended the virtual meeting.
Contact: Jerry Humphreys (609) 984-7469
5. NTSF Webinar to Discuss the Vermont Yankee Rad-Waste Canister (RWC) Shipment
Campaign
Page 31 of 43
On June 17th, the NTSF held a webinar to discuss the Vermont Yankee Rad-Waste
Canister (RWC) Shipment Campaign. An overview of the radiological decommissioning
of the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plant Station was presented. A review of the
status of the shipment campaign and lessons learned in regard to waste packaging,
transportation, disposal and other associated issues was also presented.
Three (3) NES Engineers and the NES Supervisor attended the webinar.
Contact: Veena Gubbi (609) 984-7457
6. NTSF Webinar – “Day in the Life of a WIPP Shipment”
DOE’s Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) is the nation's only deep geologic long-lived
radioactive waste repository. Located twenty-six miles southeast of Carlsbad, NM, WIPP
permanently isolates defense-generated transuranic (TRU) waste 2,150 feet underground
in an ancient salt formation.
On June 29th, the NTSF held a webinar to discuss what a “Day in the Life of a WIPP
Shipment” involves. The webinar presentation was made by a three-person panel
representing DOE’s Idaho National Laboratory (INL), the Idaho State Police and WIPP.
The INL representative described how the TRU is characterized, prepared, and loaded for
shipment. The Idaho State Police representative discussed the Commercial Vehicle
Safety Alliance (CVSA) inspections of the shipment and vehicle done prior to its
departure from INL and the tracking of the shipment while enroute. The WIPP
representative described the shipment receipt inspection process and the placement of the
shipment into its final resting place in the below ground salt mine. Following the
presentations, webinar attendees were given the opportunity to ask questions.
Three (3) NES Engineers and the NES Supervisor attended the webinar.
Contact: Veena Gubbi (609) 984-7457
7. NTSF Planning Committee Meeting
On June 9th, the 2021 National Meeting Planning Committee held a virtual meeting. The
NES Supervisor is a member of the committee and attended the meeting. Due to the
present COVID-19 situation combined with the travel bans of many States and Tribes, it
was previously decided to hold the 2021 NTSF national meeting virtually. During this
meeting, discussions pertaining to the webinars being developed in lieu of actual meeting
sessions were discussed. Preplanning for the 2022 meeting was also discussed by the
representative from the Northeast regional group. Activities of various ad-hoc working
groups were also discussed.
Contact: Jerry Humphreys (609) 984-7469
Page 32 of 43
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Decommissioning Citizens Advisory Panel’s (NDCAP) Federal
Nuclear Waste Policy Committee Holds Public Meeting
On December 7th, 2020, the NDCAP voted to create a Federal Nuclear Waste Policy Committee
to take a deeper look at current and potential policies on nuclear waste (spent nuclear fuel) and to
provide information to the NDCAP concerning the spent fuel storage and disposal issues in the
United States. The Committee will develop recommendations on the nuclear waste policies for
the full panel to consider.
On June 21st, the Federal Nuclear Waste Policy Committee held a virtual public meeting. Panel
members discussed federal government funding for Consolidated Interim Storage Facilities
(CISF); the Nuclear Waste Policy Act; the Yucca Mountain permanent repository; and, spent
nuclear fuel reprocessing. A representative from the nuclear industry provided an overview on
the Waste Controls Specialist (WCS) activities.
One (1) NES Engineer attended the virtual meeting.
Contact: Veena Gubbi (609) 984-7457
Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Decommissioning Citizens Advisory Panel
(NDCAP) Holds Public Meeting
On May 24th, the Pilgrim NDCAP held a virtual public meeting. The NDCAP advises the
Massachusetts Governor and educates citizens across the state on activities related to the shut
down and decommissioning of the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station. The NDCAP holds public
meetings at least four times per year. At the meeting, a representative of the Comprehensive
Decommissioning International (CDI), a subsidiary of Holtec International, provided an update
on the annual nuclear decommissioning trust fund and current decommissioning activities (fuel
move campaign; building demolition; reactor segmentation; and site characterization study) at
the Pilgrim site. A representative of the Commonwealth’s Interagency Working Group (IWG)
provided an update on the site assessment work. A representative from Plymouth Township
provided an update on the security at the Pilgrim Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation
ISFSI). Following the presentations, questions and concerns from the panel members were
addressed by the presenters. After the panel question and answer session, questions and
concerns from the members of the public were addressed.
One (1) NES Engineer watched the recording of the meeting on June 14th.
Contact: Veena Gubbi (609) 984-7457
Community Engagement Panel (CEP) at Southern California Edison’s (SCE) San Onofre
Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) Holds Public Meeting
The SONGS CEP serves as a conduit for public information and encourages community
involvement and communication with the SONGS co-owners on matters related to SONGS
decommissioning. The CEP holds public meetings at least four times per year.
Page 33 of 43
On June 17th, the SONGS Decommissioning CEP held a virtual meeting. The representatives
from SCE provided an overview of the decommissioning and demolition activities at the site.
The representatives from SONGS Decommissioning Solutions (SDS) provided an overview of
the dismantlement plan, timeline, demolition sequence, environmental stewardship and
mitigations, waste packaging and transportation. Following the presentations, questions and
concerns from the CEP were addressed by both the SCE and SDS. After all CEP’s questions
were addressed, the public was given an opportunity to raise its concerns/questions.
One NES Engineer watched the recording of the meeting on June 29th.
Contact: Veena Gubbi (609) 984-7457
Radioactive Materials Shipment Notifications
The Bureau of Nuclear Engineering is responsible for tracking certain radioactive materials that
are transported in New Jersey. Advance notification for these radioactive materials is in three
categories: 1) Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste; 2) Highway Route Control Quantity Shipments;
and 3) Radionuclides of Concern. Each category must meet certain packaging and notification
requirements established by the federal government. Following is a table representing the
number of shipments completed in June 2021:
Spent Fuel and
Nuclear Waste
Highway Route Control
Quantity Shipments
Radionuclides of
Concern
0 0 0
Contact: Jerry Humphreys (609) 984-7469 or Veena Gubbi (609) 984-7457
Page 34 of 43
BUREAU OF NUCLEAR ENGINEERING
STATISTICAL INFORMATION
EMERGENCY AND NON-EMERGENCY EVENT NOTIFICATIONS FOR
JUNE 2021
Emergency events (EEs) at nuclear power plants are classified, in increasing order of severity,
as an Unusual Event (UE), Alert, Site Area Emergency (SAE), and General Emergency (GE).
Non-emergency events (NEEs) are less serious events that require notification of the NRC
within one to twenty-four hours. The nuclear power plants operating in New Jersey also notify
the BNE of NEEs. The BNE analyzes the NEEs as part of its surveillance of nuclear power
plant operation.
JUNE 2021 JAN - JUNE 2021 JAN - JUNE 2020
EE
NEE
EE
NEE
EE
NEE
OYSTER CREEK
0
0
0
0
0
0
SALEM 1
0
0
0
0
0
1
SALEM 2
0
0
0
0
0
0
SALEM SITE
0
0
0
0
0
1
HOPE CREEK
0
0
0
0
0
0
OC
SA Unit 1
SA Unit 2
HC
0
100
Plant Operating Performance – June 2021
Note: On September 17th, 2018 Oyster Creek permanently ceased operation.
Page 35 of 43
C. NUCLEAR ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SECTION
Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program
The BNE conducts a comprehensive Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP)
in the environs surrounding New Jersey’s four nuclear generating stations. The program
collected 60 samples during the month of June 2021. The number and type of samples collected
are given in the table below.
Sample results are entered into the BNE’s database for tracking and trending of environmental
results. Data obtained from these analyses are used to determine the effect, if any, of the
operation of New Jersey’s nuclear power plants on the environment and the public. BNE staff
reviews all results to ensure that required levels of detection have been met and that state and
federal radiological limits have not been exceeded. Any exceedances, or anomalous data, are
investigated. The REMP includes the development of annual data tables. The data tables,
covering sampling results conducted during the prior calendar year in the environs of the Oyster
Creek and Salem / Hope Creek nuclear power plants, can be found on the NJDEP website at
http://www.nj.gov/dep/rpp/bne/esmr.htm, along with data tables from previous years.
Questions regarding specific test results or the annual environmental report can be directed to
Karen Tuccillo at (609) 994-7443. Results of specific analyses can be obtained by request.
COUNT OF SAMPLES COLLECTED IN JUNE 2021
SAMPLE MEDIUM NUMBER OF SAMPLES
AIR FILTER 28
AIR IODINE 12
MILK (Cow) 4
SURFACE WATER 8
VEGETABLES 8
TOTAL SAMPLES 60
Update on Salem Units 1 & 2 and Hope Creek Tritium Monitoring
During the month of June 2021, 5 groundwater monitoring well samples were collected and
shipped to the BNE’s contract laboratory, GEL Laboratories, for radiological analysis.
Contact: James J. Vouglitois (609) 984-7514 or Karen Tuccillo (609) 984-7443
Holtec / Oyster Creek Plant Access Training
On June 10, 2021, a staff member completed Annual Site Access (Fitness for Duty / Access
Authorization) training at Oyster Creek.
Contact: Paul E. Schwartz (609) 984-7539
Page 36 of 43
USNRC Annual Assessment Region I Nuclear Power Plants
Staff members attended a webinar on the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission
(USNRC) Annual Assessment of operating nuclear power plants in Region I. The purpose of
this meeting was for the USNRC staff to meet directly with individuals to discuss regulatory and
technical issues, including safety performance and operation through the previous calendar year.
Attendees had an opportunity to ask questions of the USNRC staff or make comments about the
issues discussed throughout the meeting.
The USNRC combined the meeting for all operating nuclear power plants in Region I, including
Beaver Valley, Calvert Cliffs, Hope Creek, James A. Fitzpatrick, Limerick, Nine Mile Point,
Peach Bottom, R.E. Ginna, Salem and Susquehanna nuclear stations.
The NRC’s annual assessment letters regarding each site’s performance during 2020 (2020q4)
can be found at: https://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/oversight/listofasmrpt.html. Additional
information related to the NRC’s annual assessment process and the safety performance of each
site can be found on the NRC’s website at:
https://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/oversight.html
Contacts: Paul E. Schwartz (609) 984-7539 or Jay Vouglitois (609) 984 7514
Oyster Creek Historical Site Assessment for Decommissioning
NEES staff are in the process of reviewing the Historical Site Assessment (HSA) for the Oyster
Creek Nuclear Generating Station, prepared by Holtec/Comprehensive Decommissioning
International. The purpose of the HSA is to identify systems, structures, components, and land
areas at the Oyster Creek Station where there is a potential for radiological contamination to
exist as a result of the operation of the nuclear power plant from 1969 to 2018. The results of the
HSA will be used to develop survey and sampling plans as part of the License Termination
process and to ensure compliance with the NJDEP Bureau of Environmental Radiation
Remediation Standards for Radioactive Materials.
Contacts: Karen Tuccillo (609) 994-7443.
Effluent Release Data
The BNE monitors the effluents released from all four (4) nuclear generating stations each
month. The reported effluents include fission and activation products, total iodine, total
particulate and tritium released to the atmosphere and water. At the Oyster Creek, Hope Creek
and Salem nuclear power plants, releases to the air and water are monitored each month and
compared to historic releases. Releases to the atmosphere are from the 112-meter stack (Oyster
Creek) or various monitored building vents (Oyster Creek, Hope Creek and Salem). On
September 17, 2018, the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station ceased to generate power
leading to a reduction in gaseous effluents. On September 25, 2018, the plant officially entered
Decommissioning.
Page 37 of 43
Prior to November 2010, Oyster Creek did not routinely release liquid effluents to the
environment. In accordance with a DEP Directive (EA ID #: PEA100001) issued to the Oyster
Creek Nuclear Generating Station, and the Spill Compensation and Control Act (N.J.S.A. 58:10-
23.11), former Oyster Creek owner Exelon Corporation was required to cleanup and remove
tritium discharges released onsite from underground pipe leaks that occurred during calendar
year 2009. In late November 2010, the pumping of groundwater at Oyster Creek was initiated in
support of the ongoing tritium groundwater monitoring project. With DEP approval, Exelon
sampled groundwater from a dedicated pumping well (MW-73), measuring the concentration of
tritium in the extracted groundwater and discharging it into the plant’s intake structure.
On June 20, 2019, the NRC approved the transfer of the Oyster Creek license from Exelon
Corporation to Oyster Creek Environmental Protection, as owner, and Holtec Decommissioning
International (HDI), as decommissioning operator. The license-transfer officially took place on
July 1, 2019. HDI continued the sampling and measurement of tritium concentrations in
groundwater from MW-73.
On January 9, 2020, in a letter from the State of New Jersey DEP to the Holtec International
Decommissioning Plant Manager of Oyster Creek, the Bureau of Nuclear Engineering and Site
Remediation Program concurred that the Oyster Creek site had complied with the requirements
outlined in the paragraph 41 of the Directive and Notice to Insurers EA ID #: PEA100001,
thereby closing the Directive. While the pump and treat remediation of tritium has been
completed, HDI continues groundwater monitoring as part of their Radiological Groundwater
Protection Program.
In addition to groundwater monitoring, it is necessary for the plant to process and discharge
liquid effluents as a necessary activity during decommissioning of the site and eventual license
termination. Radioactive liquid effluent discharged as a result of decommissioning activities will
be monitored by HDI. All liquid effluent data are reported below. Additional information on the
Oyster Creek tritium leak is available at the DEP website,
http://www.state.nj.us/dep/rpp/bne/octritium.htm.
The May 2021 gaseous and liquid effluent release data for the Oyster Creek, Salem, and Hope
Creek nuclear plants have been included in this report.
Page 38 of 43
PSEG Nuclear
Radioactive Effluent Releases1
Nuclear Environmental Engineering Section
For the Period of 05-01-21 to 05-31-21
Hope Creek
Gaseous
Effluents
Hope Creek
Liquid Effluents
Effluent Effluent
Fission Gases 0.00016 Ci Fission Products 0.0003 Ci
Iodines 0.00011 Ci Tritium 8.2 Ci
Particulates 0.00042 Ci
Tritium 14.1 Ci
Salem Unit 1
Gaseous Effluent
Salem Unit 1
Liquid Effluents
Effluent Effluent
Fission Gases 0 Ci Fission Products 0.00006 Ci
Iodines 0 Ci Tritium 7.9 Ci
Particulates 0 Ci
Tritium 174.0 Ci
Salem Unit 2
Gaseous Effluent
Salem Unit 2
Liquid Effluents
Effluent Effluent
Fission Gases 0.026 Ci Fission Products 0.00011 Ci
Iodines 0 Ci Tritium 16.7 Ci
Particulates 0 Ci
Tritium 0.14 Ci
1 Effluent releases are preliminary totals. The official radioactive effluent releases from each facility are
contained in the licensee’s “Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report” and can be found on the USNRC
website at, https://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/ops-experience/tritium/plant-info.html. These reports
are submitted annually by the licensee to the NRC by May 1st of the following calendar year.
Page 39 of 43
Holtec Decommissioning International (HDI)
Radioactive Effluent Releases
Nuclear Environmental Engineering Section
For the Period of 05-01-21 to 05-31-21
Oyster Creek
Gaseous Effluents
Elevated Releases
Oyster Creek
Gaseous Effluents
Ground Releases
Effluent Effluent
Fission Gases 0 Ci Fission Gases 0 Ci
Iodines 0 Ci Iodines 0 Ci
Particulates 0 Ci Particulates 0 Ci
Tritium 0.111 Ci Tritium 0 Ci
Holtec Decommissioning International (HDI)
Radioactive Effluent Releases
Nuclear Environmental Engineering Section
For the Period of 05-01-21 to 05-31-21
Oyster Creek Liquid Effluents
Effluent
Fission Products 0 Ci
Tritium 0.501 Ci
Oyster Creek Liquid Effluent Groundwater Extraction2
Effluent
Tritium Not in Service Ci
Contact: Paul E. Schwartz (609) 984-7539
2 On November 4, 2019, Pumping Well MW-73 failed and was placed out of service (Idle). The current
plan is to discontinue monitoring MW-73 and to terminate pumping unless activity is identified that would
require restoration of groundwater extraction by returning the pump for MW-73 to service.
Page 40 of 43
D. NUCLEAR EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS SECTION
Continuous Radiological Environmental Surveillance Telemetry System
Thirty-three Continuous Radiological Environmental Surveillance Telemetry (CREST) sites are
located in the environs of Oyster Creek, Salem I, II, and Hope Creek nuclear generating stations.
CREST is a part of the Air Pollution/Radiation Data Acquisition and Early Warning System, a
remote data acquisition system whose central computer is located in Trenton, New Jersey. Sites
are accessed via cellular communication and polled for radiological and meteorological data
every minute.
The Air Pollution/Radiation Data Acquisition and Early Warning System is equipped with a
threshold alarm of twenty-five (25) microRoentgens per hour. The system notifies staff via text
messages and email alerts if the threshold is exceeded, providing 24-hour coverage of potential
radiological abnormalities surrounding each nuclear facility.
Contact: Ann Pfaff (609) 984-7451
The following tables include the average ambient radiation levels at each site for the month of
June:
Artificial Island CREST System Ambient Radiation Levels
June 2021 Derived From One Minute Averages
UNITS = mR/Hr
AI1 AI2 AI3 AI4 AI5
.0063 .0064 .0064 .0064 .0066
AI6 AI7 AI8 AI9 AI10
.0065 .0056 .0054 .0074 .0053
Oyster Creek CREST System Ambient Radiation Levels
June 2021 Derived From One Minute Averages
UNITS = mR/Hr
OC1 OC2 OC3 OC4
.0040 .0054 .0058 .0048
OC5 OC6 OC7 OC8
.0058 .0060 .0047 .0051
OC9 OC10 OC11 OC12
.0058 .0082 .0054 .0055
OC13 OC14 OC15 OC16
.0047 .0053 .0050 .0053
**** indicates insufficient valid data
Contact: Ann Pfaff (609) 984-7451
Page 41 of 43
State of Readiness Work
During June 2021, NEPS staff have diligently worked to ensure the BNE is in a continued State-
of-Readiness under current social distancing and work-from-home conditions. NEPS operating
in a State-of-Readiness means that the section is ready to respond to a nuclear emergency under
current conditions. To ensure a continued State-of-Readiness, at least one NEPS staff person
comes into the office one to two days per week in order to complete a checklist of items
pertaining to the proper maintenance and operation of emergency response vehicles, radiation
detection instruments, and facility communication equipment.
Contact: Ann Pfaff (609) 984-7451
Radio Committee Meeting
NEPS staff attended the DEP Radio Committee meeting held virtually on Tuesday, June 9, 2021.
Agenda topics included discussion of the Radio User Agreement, purchase of additional P25
radios, Interoperability Projects and associated exercises and User Group Training.
Contact: Ann Pfaff (609) 984-7451
Licensee EP Meeting
On June 14, 2021, NEPS staff held a virtual State and Licensee emergency preparedness meeting
with PSEG Nuclear LLC, Holtec/CDI and NJOEM. Discussion topics included: public hearing
preparations and coordination; RadWatch exchange planning; Ocean County sirens and Pick-up
& Ring lines; new eight-year exercise cycle planning; NJ and DE IMAAC training; dose
assessment workshop planning; discussion on ERPA 8 coverage and revisions; Holtec
decommissioning updates; congratulating Jon Christiansen on his full retirement at the end of
June!
Contact: Ann Pfaff (609) 984-7451
RadWatch Unit Replacement
NEPS staff have received newly zeroed RadWatch units from New Jersey State Police Office of
Emergency Management as replacements for the ones currently held by nuclear emergency
responders. RadWatches are used as Legal Dose of Record dosimeters during a nuclear
emergency to determine dosage obtained by a responder for an event. The replacements will be
distributed after logging and creation of a database for tracking purposes.
Contact: Ann Pfaff (609) 984-7451
Emergency Operations Facility Quarterly Inspection
On June 24, 2021, NEPS staff performed a full inspection of the Emergency Operations Facility
(EOF). The BNE is assigned space at the PSEG provided EOF for use during an emergency to
Page 42 of 43
coordinate dose assessment, engineering assessment, field data collection, and developing
Protective Action Recommendations, when necessary. NEPS staff performs these quarterly
inspections to ensure all computers, programs, methods of communications and necessary tools
are available and functioning in case of an emergency. Due to the public health emergency, the
inspections have been completed less frequently than every quarter.
Contact: Ann Pfaff (609) 984-7451
Meeting with PSEG Nuclear LLC Management
On June 29, 2021, Bureau of Nuclear Engineering staff met with PSEG Nuclear LLC
management for their periodic update meeting. PSEG provided briefings on plant status for
Salem and Hope Creek, refueling outages, New Jersey Wind Port Project, Dry Cask Storage and
Spent Fuel Study submitted to BPU and DEP in April, pandemic response and organizational
changes during the virtual meeting. The meetings are held on a periodic basis, sometimes
quarterly or semi-annually, depending on the topics to be discussed. This allows BNE and its
management chain to maintain good working relationships and interface with all levels of PSEG
Nuclear management regarding operation of Salem 1 & 2 and Hope Creek Nuclear Generating
Stations.
Contact: Ann Pfaff (609) 984-7451
Page 43 of 43