delaney on cerebral protection

41
CEREBRAL PROTECTION Anthony Delaney MBBS MSc FACEM FCICM Staff Specialist in Intensive Care, Royal North Shore Hospital Senior Lecturer, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney

Upload: oliver-flower

Post on 12-Jun-2015

934 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


3 download

DESCRIPTION

Research guru and PI for the ARISE study, college examiner and semi-professional forrest-based carpenter, Anthony always gives a fascinating talk. This time he gives an intelligent and considered breakdown on the nebulous topic of cerebral protection.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Delaney on Cerebral protection

CEREBRAL PROTECTION

Anthony Delaney MBBS MSc FACEM FCICM

Staff Specialist in Intensive Care, Royal North Shore HospitalSenior Lecturer, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney

Page 2: Delaney on Cerebral protection

Cerebral Protection

Page 3: Delaney on Cerebral protection

Cerebral protection

Surgical: Decompressive craniectomy

Medical: Hypothermia

Page 4: Delaney on Cerebral protection
Page 5: Delaney on Cerebral protection

Decompressive craniectomy in diffuse traumatic brain injury

Population: Aged 15-59 Severe non penetrating brain injury (GCS 3-8),

Class III Marshall score Exclusion: mass lesion on CT, dilated unreactive

pupils, spinal cord injury, cardiac arrest ICP > 20 for 15 minutes within an hour after;

Sedation, Normal CO2, osmotic therapy, NM blockade and CSF drainage

Within 72 hours of injury

Page 6: Delaney on Cerebral protection

Decompressive craniectomy in diffuse traumatic brain injury

Intervention: Standardised large bifrontotemperoparietal

craniectomy with opening of the dura

Page 7: Delaney on Cerebral protection

Decompressive craniectomy in diffuse traumatic brain injury

Comparison: Second tier therapy for refractory raised

intracranial hypertension Hypothermia Barbiturate coma Decompression after 72 hours

Outcome: Extended Glasgow Outcome Score

Initially dichotomised Ordinal scale

Page 8: Delaney on Cerebral protection

Decompressive craniectomy in diffuse traumatic brain injury

Allocation concealment: Yes, automated telephone system

Blinding: Outcome assessment by telephone by blinded assessors

Complete follow-up: Yes

Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes

Baseline balance: More patients in DC group had bilateral unreactive pupils

Concommittant interventions: Different between the 2 groups

Page 9: Delaney on Cerebral protection

Decompressive craniectomy in diffuse traumatic brain injury

Page 10: Delaney on Cerebral protection

Decompressive craniectomy in diffuse traumatic brain injury

Page 11: Delaney on Cerebral protection

Decompressive craniectomy in diffuse traumatic brain injury

Page 12: Delaney on Cerebral protection

Decompressive craniectomy in diffuse traumatic brain injury

Results December 2002-April 2010 15 ICUs in Australasia-ish (inc Saudi Arabia) Revised primary outcome

Page 13: Delaney on Cerebral protection

Decompressive craniectomy in diffuse traumatic brain injury

Page 14: Delaney on Cerebral protection

Decompressive craniectomy in diffuse traumatic brain injury

Page 15: Delaney on Cerebral protection

Decompressive craniectomy in diffuse traumatic brain injury

Page 16: Delaney on Cerebral protection

Decompressive craniectomy in diffuse traumatic brain injury

Page 17: Delaney on Cerebral protection

Decompressive craniectomy in diffuse traumatic brain injury

Page 18: Delaney on Cerebral protection

Decompressive craniectomy in diffuse traumatic brain injury

However the adjusted analysis Age, last GCS before intubation, GCS post

resuscitation, Marshall score; GOSe 1.66 (95% CI 0.94 to 2.94, p=0.08) Good v Evil OR 2.31 (95% CI 1.10 to 4.83, p=0.03)

And non reactive pupils GOSe 1.53 (95% CI 0.86 to 2.73, p=0.15) Good v Evil OR 1.9 (95% CI 0.95 to 3.79, p=0.07)

Page 19: Delaney on Cerebral protection

Decompressive craniectomy in diffuse traumatic brain injury

So……. RESCUE ICP

ICP>25 for 1-12 hours Abnormal CT Primary decompression excluded but prior

surgery not an exclusion Recruitment commenced 2005 334/400 recruited as of 18/9/12

Page 20: Delaney on Cerebral protection

Hypothermia for cerebral protection Pathophysiology:

Reduction of CMRO2 of 6-7% per 1o drop in temp Reduction in ICP Decreases excitatory amino acids and lactate in

ischaemia/reperfusion injury Reduces intracellular Ca++ sequestration Reduces neutrophil adhesion Reduces apoptosis Reduces free radical production

• Induced hypothermia in critical care medicine: A review. Bernard et al CCM 2003;31:2041-2051

• Application of therapeutic hypothermia in the ICU: opportunities and pitfalls of a promising treatment modality. Part 1: indications and evidence. Polderman. ICM 2004;30:556-575

Page 21: Delaney on Cerebral protection

Hypothermia for cerebral protection

Page 22: Delaney on Cerebral protection
Page 23: Delaney on Cerebral protection

Hypothermia for neuroprotection in adults after cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Question: To assess the effectiveness of therapeutic hypothermia in patients after

cardiac arrest

Studies: Randomised and quasi-randomised studies

Population: Adult patients who suffered cardiac arrest (in or out of hospital)

Intervention: Temperature target <35oC

Control: Standard treatment

Outcome: Neurological recovery

Cerebral performance category

Page 24: Delaney on Cerebral protection

Hypothermia for neuroprotection in adults after cardiopulmonary resuscitation

5 Studies

Page 25: Delaney on Cerebral protection

Hypothermia for neuroprotection in adults after cardiopulmonary resuscitation

3 studies thought suitable for pooling

Page 26: Delaney on Cerebral protection

Hypothermia for neuroprotection in adults after cardiopulmonary resuscitation

3 studies thought suitable for pooling

Page 27: Delaney on Cerebral protection

Hypothermia for neuroprotection in adults after cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Conventional cooling methods to induce mild therapeutic hypothermia seem to improve survival and neurological outcome after cardiac arrest. Our review supports the current best medical practice as recommended by the International Resuscitation Guidelines

Page 28: Delaney on Cerebral protection
Page 29: Delaney on Cerebral protection
Page 30: Delaney on Cerebral protection
Page 31: Delaney on Cerebral protection
Page 32: Delaney on Cerebral protection

Higher risk of bias in existing trials -> overestimation of treatment effect

Low inclusion rate (8%) -> poor generalisability Or better signal to noise ratio Target population

Early stopping and no power calculation More of a type II error problem

Non-standard change to palliative treatment Dude ?!?

Adverse effects of hypothermia

Page 33: Delaney on Cerebral protection
Page 34: Delaney on Cerebral protection

Adverse effects of hypothermia Prospective observational study 22 centres

Page 35: Delaney on Cerebral protection

Most published research findings are false

Really?

Page 36: Delaney on Cerebral protection

Most published research findings are false

Complicated statistical argument Prior probability Power of the study Level of significance Bias

Flexibiilty in design Definition Outcomes Analysis

Page 37: Delaney on Cerebral protection
Page 38: Delaney on Cerebral protection

Contradicted research

Original clinical research cited more than 1000 times 1990-2003

Compared to subsequent studies bigger and/or better

49 studies 45 claimed a treatment effect 16% contradicted 16% lesser treatment effect 44% replicated 24% not challenged

Page 39: Delaney on Cerebral protection

So, wherefore hypothermia

Dilemma Hypothermia has a good physiological

rationale Supported by at least

reasonable trials

Page 40: Delaney on Cerebral protection
Page 41: Delaney on Cerebral protection

QUESTIONS ??