david stern’s new demands (2) - kylestack.com · one response to “david stern’s new...

3
XXL SLAM RIDES 0-60 ANTENNA SLAM Facebook SLAM Twitter SLAM Tumblr SLAM Newsletter RSS Sunday, October 24th, 2010 at 4:00 pm | one response 0 Like Magic ‘10-11 Preview David Stern’s New Demands The commish wants to reduce player’s costs, possibly contract teams. Is there a benefit to contraction? Actually, yes. There are perceived benefits from reducing the number of teams in the League, starting with a bigger slice of the pie for all remaining franchises. “These owners want a guaranteed profit,” Boland said. “Having fewer people cutting up the pie makes the franchises more valuable.” The more successful franchises could view a smaller overall amount of money as more appealing if they were able to take a larger cut of it. It has to bother some of them that inferior franchises — on and off the court — can possibly benefit financially from their success. Feldman noted that the resulting player reassignment from eliminating two or four teams could result in more “Miami Heat” teams across the League. Imagine players like Tyreke Evans, Gerald Wallace, Chris Paul and Rudy Gay moving to new teams as part of a contraction plan. Oh yes, there is a reason players from the Kings, Bobcats, Hornets and Grizzlies can be seen as four potential contracted teams. The Kings don’t play in a terrible TV market (It’s the 19th largest out of the 28 NBA markets), but they’re in a tough arena situation. There doesn’t seem to be any concrete plan to replace the antiquated ARCO Arena. The Kings averaged 13,254 fans per game last season, the second-worst number of all teams. Given the perilous economic situation in California, and specifically Sacramento, where the unemployment rate in August was 12.8 percent, it doesn’t seem likely that the city’s residents will fill up ARCO to watch a below- average team, much less help fund the construction of a new arena. Especially when the team’s owners, the Maloofs, are billionaires who publicly revel in their excessive Las Vegas lifestyle. The Grizzlies have been a moribund NBA franchise since their inception in Vancouver in 1995. Despite finishing with a decent 40-42 record with a promising young group of players revolved around Gay, O.J. Mayo and Marc Gasol (recouped in the Pau trade), the Griz still drew only 13,485 people per game. That was the third-worst rate in the NBA last season. Memphis may just not be interested in having an NBA team. There certainly aren’t many corporate partner opportunities in the traditionally poor city outside of FedEx. To top it off, Memphis is the second-worst TV market in the League. The worst? You guessed it — New Orleans. Fielding a team in a city which has been hit so hard by environmental disasters the last five years is a wonderful story. The NBA — and NFL — deserve credit for trying to make its New Orleans-based franchise succeed. But the Hornets are one Chris Paul temper tantrum away from becoming irrelevant. Majority owner George Shinn’s plan to sell his 75 percent stake in the club to minority owner Gary Chouest, who owns 25 percent of the team, is still unresolved with no completion in sight. We’re left with the Bobcats, the franchise bought for $275 million in February, not including assumption of debt, by Michael Jordan. They seem safe on the surface. After all, they made the playoffs last season and are owned by the League’s most famous player. Yet Boland views Charlotte as a combustible situation for the NBA. “They’re always a question,” Boland said. Charlotte is a big-time banking Video: Delonte vs. Big Baby Dance-Off 19 More Videos » News & Rumors Latest Posts 58 6 6 3 10 2 Kobe Bryant: Roy over Durant Read More » Lakers Want Pau Gasol To Do More Video: Top 10 Preseason Slams Kevin Garnett: It Takes More Than Talent Michael Jordan Talks About the Charlotte Bobcats Doug Collins Back on the Sidelines HOT TOPICS: Top 50: LeBron James, No. 1 Kobe Bryant, No. 2 SLAM 143: On Sale! Bayless Traded SEARCH Home News & Rumors NBA Blogs Media Kicks College & HS Other Ballers Magazine Subscribe SLAM ONLINE | » David Stern’s New Demands http://www.slamonline.com/online/nba/2010/10/david-sterns-n... 1 of 3 10/24/10 4:54 PM

Upload: phungdung

Post on 10-Feb-2019

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

XXL SLAM RIDES 0-60 ANTENNA

SLAM Facebook SLAM Twitter SLAM Tumblr SLAM Newsletter RSS

Sunday, October 24th, 2010 at 4:00 pm | one response 0 Like

Magic ‘10-11 Preview

David Stern’s New DemandsThe commish wants to reduce player’s costs, possibly contract teams.

Is there a benefit to contraction?

Actually, yes. There are perceived benefits from reducing the number of teams in the League, starting with abigger slice of the pie for all remaining franchises.

“These owners want a guaranteed profit,” Boland said. “Having fewer people cutting up the pie makes thefranchises more valuable.” The more successful franchises could view a smaller overall amount of money asmore appealing if they were able to take a larger cut of it. It has to bother some of them that inferior franchises— on and off the court — can possibly benefit financially from their success.

Feldman noted that the resulting player reassignment from eliminating two or four teams could result in more“Miami Heat” teams across the League. Imagine players like Tyreke Evans, Gerald Wallace, Chris Paul andRudy Gay moving to new teams as part of a contraction plan.

Oh yes, there is a reason players from the Kings, Bobcats, Hornets and Grizzlies can be seen as four potentialcontracted teams.

The Kings don’t play in a terrible TV market (It’s the 19th largest out of the 28 NBA markets), but they’re in atough arena situation. There doesn’t seem to be any concrete plan to replace the antiquated ARCO Arena.The Kings averaged 13,254 fans per game last season, the second-worst number of all teams. Given theperilous economic situation in California, and specifically Sacramento, where the unemployment rate inAugust was 12.8 percent, it doesn’t seem likely that the city’s residents will fill up ARCO to watch a below-average team, much less help fund the construction of a new arena. Especially when the team’s owners, theMaloofs, are billionaires who publicly revel in their excessive Las Vegas lifestyle.

The Grizzlies have been a moribund NBA franchise since their inception in Vancouver in 1995. Despitefinishing with a decent 40-42 record with a promising young group of players revolved around Gay, O.J. Mayoand Marc Gasol (recouped in the Pau trade), the Griz still drew only 13,485 people per game. That was thethird-worst rate in the NBA last season. Memphis may just not be interested in having an NBA team. Therecertainly aren’t many corporate partner opportunities in the traditionally poor city outside of FedEx. To top it off,Memphis is the second-worst TV market in the League. The worst? You guessed it — New Orleans.

Fielding a team in a city which has been hit so hard by environmental disasters the last five years is awonderful story. The NBA — and NFL — deserve credit for trying to make its New Orleans-based franchisesucceed. But the Hornets are one Chris Paul temper tantrum away from becoming irrelevant. Majority ownerGeorge Shinn’s plan to sell his 75 percent stake in the club to minority owner Gary Chouest, who owns 25percent of the team, is still unresolved with no completion in sight.

We’re left with the Bobcats, the franchise bought for $275 million in February, not including assumption ofdebt, by Michael Jordan. They seem safe on the surface. After all, theymade the playoffs last season and are owned by the League’s mostfamous player. Yet Boland views Charlotte as a combustible situation forthe NBA.

“They’re always a question,” Boland said. Charlotte is a big-time banking

Video: Delontevs. Big BabyDance-Off

19

More Videos »

News & Rumors Latest Posts

58

6

6

3

10

2

Kobe Bryant:Roy overDurant

Read More »

Lakers Want Pau Gasol To Do More

Video: Top 10 Preseason Slams

Kevin Garnett: It Takes More Than Talent

Michael Jordan Talks About the CharlotteBobcats

Doug Collins Back on the Sidelines

HOT TOPICS: Top 50: LeBron James, No. 1 Kobe Bryant, No. 2 SLAM 143: On Sale! Bayless Traded

SEARCH

Home News & Rumors NBA Blogs Media Kicks College & HS Other Ballers Magazine

Subscribe

SLAM ONLINE | » David Stern’s New Demands http://www.slamonline.com/online/nba/2010/10/david-sterns-n...

1 of 3 10/24/10 4:54 PM

community, so when the banking industry thrived during much of the2000s, so did Charlotte. But since the latest recession, the bankingindustry has been going through rough times, meaning the Bobcatshave lost many possibilities for corporate partners and payingcustomers. Then there’s the issue of competition.

“You are competing into the teeth of North Carolina, Duke, NorthCarolina State and Wake Forest,” Boland emphasized. “A lot of peoplewith money in Charlotte already are paying to have college tickets.”

It makes it difficult for the Bobcats to gain a strong foothold in a marketwhich embraced the Hornets in the late ’80s and ’90s because that wastheir expansion team. The Hornets were genuinely theirs — not amakeup squad which the Bobcats became after the Hornets moved to New Orleans — during a team whenthe NBA expanded rapidly. Perhaps too rapidly, said Boland.

Six teams were added to the League from 1988-95. Owners of the existing teams loved it at the time becausethat meant they reaped expansion fees. Yet now it’s a drag on a League which has the vision of expandingone day overseas. Europe has been seen as a clear expansion goal for Stern for a number of years. Bolandsaid contraction could precipitate that move. “Maybe the first step to possible European expansion is paringdown the number of teams domestically.”

An obvious retort to that point is to ask why the League wouldn’t simply relocate existing teams to Europe.Boland and Feldman noted that keeping poor ownership in place wouldn’t solve the problem, no matter wherethe team played. Furthermore, there might be legal road blocks to uprooting a franchise.

Teams are bound by their arena leases. A city could choose to legally prevent a franchise from relocating if thecity helped fund the arena in which the team plays. Plus, the corporation that owns the arena could also suethe team for breaking its lease agreement. “Contraction may be legally easier than relocation right now,”Boland said.

Contraction not only could remove teams which perform poorly on the court. It could be a means to separatebad team owners from their place in the League. It could also solve problematic lease agreements, with theLeague resolving any financial and legal disputes with arenas and cities as a result from contraction.Removing teams in those situations could also open the door to eventual expansion in more favorabledomestic or international markets. Think of it as the NBA biting a bullet to take care of their problem areas witha look toward getting a re-start of sorts in different markets.

Stern and the League won’t stick to their demands to the point they would risk locking out the playersafter the collective bargaining agreement (CBA) expires, right?

This is obviously the question nobody has an answer for. Contraction, for one, could be nothing more than athreat. Stern has put Billy Hunter, Executive Director of the NBA Player’s Association, in a situation where hecould stop contraction but sign off on some sort of cut to player’s costs. In that respect, Hunter could make anargument that even though he gave up player costs, to a degree, he also saved the jobs that the League hadthreatened to eliminate.

“Stern is clearly dictating where the concern and terms of the deal will be,” Boland said.

Since Stern and many folks on the League and player’s side have already experienced the 1998-99 owner’slockout, it would stand to reason they’d think twice before stepping into that minefield again.

“Given the saturation of the marketplace with all the different sports you can watch on television, there’s anincredible risk that if your sport goes away for any period of time, your fans might not comeback,” Feldmansaid.

With the NFL also on the verge of a work stoppage, the NBA has a possible opportunity to significantly add totheir fan base in the next two or three years. That is, if they can work out some of the serious issues outlinedby Stern last week.

Pages: 1 2

Photos Wallpapers

Allen Iverson Atlanta Hawks BostonCeltics Carmelo Anthony Charlotte Bobcats

Chicago Bulls Cleveland CavaliersDallas Mavericks Denver Nuggets Derrick RoseDetroit Pistons Dwight Howard Dwyane WadeFree Agency Golden State Warriors Houston

Rockets Kevin Durant Kevin Garnett KobeBryant LeBron James Los Angeles

Clippers Los AngelesLakers Memphis Grizzlies Miami HeatMichael Jordan Milwaukee Bucks New Jersey Nets New

Orleans Hornets New York Knicks NikeOklahoma City Thunder Orlando Magic Pau Gasol

Philadelphia 76ers Phoenix Suns Playoffs 2010

Portland Trail Blazers Recruiting Ron Artest SacramentoKings San Antonio Spurs Shaquille O'Neal TorontoRaptors Utah Jazz Washington Wizards

RSSAdd a Comment Invite a friend Share

You might be interested inThe Russian moves to Brooklyn

NBA Labor Negotiations Breakdown

NBA to Explore Contraction?

Mr. Smith

David Stern Wants NBA Player Salaries Cut by One-Third

Teachable Moments

Tags: Billy Hunter, Charlotte Bobcats, Contraction, David Stern, Memphis Grizzlies, Michael Heisley,

More News & Rumors »

18

Photos: BuckShotBrandonJennings atthe KICKS 13Photo Shoot.

More fromPhotos »

SLAM ONLINE | » David Stern’s New Demands http://www.slamonline.com/online/nba/2010/10/david-sterns-n...

2 of 3 10/24/10 4:54 PM

One Response to “David Stern’s New Demands”Caboose Posted: Oct.24 at 4:30 pm

I made a proposal on a previous thread that I think works for everyone.Calculate what 10% of each team’s total salary is. Each team then is allowedto cut that amount from their players’ annual salaries by their choosing. Noplayer can have their annual salary cut by more than 25% and rookiecontracts cannot be cut. For example, assume Orlando’s total salary is$80,000,000. That means they can cut $8,000,000 from the players theywish. They could cut $4,000,000 from Rashard, $2,000,000 from JJ,$1,000,000 from Gortat, and $1,000,000 from Vince. Additionally, the leagueneeds to lower the mid level exception to a maximum of 3 years, $3,000,000with a 10% increase. Then, cut the salary cap itself by 10%, institute a hardcap of $80,000,000 (no team can ever go over that, period.), and require 4Bird years for a team to acquire Bird Rights.

Comments

Kyle Stack Name (required)

[email protected] Mail (will not be published)

(required)

http://www.kylestack.com Website

Submit Comment

The comments section is a place to further discuss the topics in this post. Commenters who seek to

accomplish any of the following may be banned:

- Personally attack other commenters.

- Make derogatory comments regarding race, ethnicity, language, gender, sexual orientation or

religion.

- Troll, or comment with the intention of creating problems. Trolling includes, but isn't limited to,

baiting people to flame at you, encouraging people to leave the site, spamming and using

alternate IDs.

SLAMONLINE.COM

News & Rumors

NBA

NBA by Team

Blogs

Media

Kicks

College & HS

Other Ballers

The Links

The Wire

Contact Info

Advertise

Privacy Statement

Terms of Use

© 2010 Source Interlink Magazines, LLC, All rights reserved.

New Orleans Hornets, Sacramento Kings

On Sale Now

Subscribe

Get Back Issues

Customer Service

SLAM ONLINE | » David Stern’s New Demands http://www.slamonline.com/online/nba/2010/10/david-sterns-n...

3 of 3 10/24/10 4:54 PM