Data AnalysisRetreat: May 19-21, 2010

School of Education

Campbellsville University

Why? Standard 2: Assessment System and Unit Evaluation

• The unit has an assessment system that collects and analyzes data on

– applicant qualifications,– candidate performance, – graduate performance and– unit operations

• Purpose– to evaluate and improve the performance

of candidates, the unit and its programs.

Why? NCATE Standard 2b:

• Candidate assessment data are regularly and systematically collected, compiled, aggregated, summarized and analyzed to

– Improve candidate performance– Improve program quality– Improve unit operations

Why? NCATE Standard 2c

• The unit regularly and systematically uses data, including candidate and graduate performance information to evaluate the efficacy of its

– Courses– Programs– Clinical experiences

Why? NCATE Standard 2c

• The unit analyzes program evaluation and performance data to initiate changes in

– Programs– Unit operations

Overview• Data for 2009

– Compared to 2006-2008

• Undergraduate Programs– CAPs 1, 2, 3, 4 – Praxis II – Diversity Proficiencies

• Graduate Programs: MAE/SED/Rank I– CAPs 5, 6 and 7

• Faculty/Course Evaluations

CAP 1: Admission to TE 2009

• Number AdmittedSp09: 27 F09: 22 2009 Total: 49Analysis: 9-14 < previous three yearsAnalysis: 9-14 < previous three years

• GPASp09 3.46 F09 3.44 09 Av. 3.45 06-08 Av. 3.40> previous three years> previous three years

CAP 1 Competency Exams: 2009

ACT PPST: R PPST: M PPST: WSP09 23.60 177.20 174.60 175.60

F09 23.28 176.25 172.25 173.75

09 Av. 23.45 176.78 173.56 174.78

06-09 Av.

23.51 177.21 174.53 174.58

Analysis < 07, 08

<06Overall average

>06

< 07, 08

<overall average

>previous 3 years and overall average

< 06, 07

>08 & overall average

CAP 1 Dispositions 2009

• Average 2009 4.36• Average 2006-2009 4.17

• Sp 09 4.35 ; F 09 4.37• Highest (4) Honest/Ethical 4.53

(1) Caring 4.40• Lowest (3) Values Ind. Differences 4.27

(5) Responsible Class. Behavior 4.27

CAP 1 Dispositions 2009SP/Fall 2009

AverageAnalysis

Overall 4.35, 4.37 4.36 < all previous

1-Caring 4.48, 4.37 4.40 < all previous

2-Respects 4.35, 4.39 4.37 <all previous

3- Values individual

Differences*

4.25, 4.28 4.27 < all previous

4-Honest & ethical

4.56, 4.52 4.53 <all previous

5.Responsible Classroom Behavior*

4.21, 4.29 4.27 <all previous

CAP 1 Interviews 2009Overall

Interview

GPA Disposi-tions

Experience

Oral

Comm.

*Impact/Student

Learning

Sp09 4.00 3.47 4.27 3.60 4.20 3.53

F09 4.56 3.70 4.40 4.30 4.20 4.30

09 Av. 4.22 3.56 4.32 3.88 4.20 3.84

06-09 Av.

3.96 3.43 4.04 3.53 4.11 3.55

Analysis > Previous years

> Previous years

> Previous years

>

Previous years

> Previous years

F09 >

Previous years

CAP 1: Admission by Major 2009Major # Adm.09 Analysis

P-5 Sp=7; F=4

(11)

< last three years F09 ‘way’ down

5-9

Opt.1

Eng 3

Math 3

Sc 1; SocSt 1

F09=8

<previous 3 years

2 in fall 09

1 English; 1 Math.

5-9

Opt. 2

0 06=8

07=4

08=2

8-12 Eng=1/2

Math=3/1

Bio=1/0

Chem=0/1

SS=2/5

E=3,1, 6

M=3, 4, 4

B= 0, 1, 2

SS= 6, 7, 3

1 chemistry last four years; biology & chemistry lowest

P-12 Art=0/2

Music=4/3

PE=1/1

Health=2/1

Art=2, 3, 1

Music=10, 5, 10

PE=5, 5, 5

Health=0, 0, 0

Art/ Physical Education- lowest for admissions

CAP 1: Diversity 2009• Age: most common range—16-25, 83/91% • Gender 76% females ; 24% males • Ethnicity 96/91% white;

Black 4%; Hispanic 2%• Exceptionality 26% < previous

21% GT; .5% LD; 1% visual; .5 ADD; 76% unidentified

• 2nd Language 15% 7% Spanish

• Religion Baptist- 59%; Christian-26%;

Catholic-7%; Methodist-4%

CAP 1: Diversity 2009• Live at home: 13%, < all previous • Work: 30%, < all previous• Income:

80% Blank

2% 25,401-42,802

9% 42,803-67,326

More did not answer.

• FatherHigh school: 65%; College: 11%; Graduate: 11%

• Mother:High school: 54 %; College: 22%; Graduate: 13%

CAP 2: Continuation in TE 2009• 39 Approved

– Overall GPA: • 3.40/3.29 3.36 average• < all previous and 06-09 average

– Professional GPA:• 3.75/3.70 3.73 average• < all previous

– Field Hours: 40, > previous– PPD Hours: 11, > previous

CAP 2 Dispositions 2009SP/Fall 2009

AverageAnalysis

1-Caring 4.52, 4.13 4.43 < 07

2-Respects 4.54, 4.18 4.45 <08

3- Values individual

Differences*

4.49, 4.18 4.42 < all previous

4-Honest & ethical

4.66, 4.35 4.59 >all previous

5.Responsible Classroom Behavior*

4.43, 4.35 4.41 <08

CAP 3: 2009Admission to Student Teaching

• Total 2009: 47 • GPA:

– Overall GPA: 3.39 – Major GPA: 3.42– Prof. GPA: 3.77

• Dispositions: – Overall: 4.59 – Education Professor: 4.24 – Cooperating Teacher: 4.77 – Self Evaluation: 4.53– Instrument changed fall, 2006

CAP 3: Field/PPD Hours 2009• Total: Field hours-130.35; PPD-32.57

• Type:• Assisting 96%, consistently high• Instructing 91%, consistently high• Observing 96%, consistently high• Research 55%, comparable to previous• Tutoring 64%, < f08• Participating in education related community events• Interacting with families of students• Attending school board meetings

• Diversity:• Ethnicity 92%, comparable to 06 & 08• Exceptionality 89%, < previous years• Gender 89%• Linguistic * 55%, < previous• Race 81%, < 07, 08• Religious 62%• Socio-econ. 87%

CAP 3 Portfolio Holistic Scores

2.22.32.42.52.62.72.82.9

3

F2008

2009

CAP 3: Portfolios 2009• Portfolio Mean Holistic Score 2.49

< fall, 2008 2.70• Changeover to KTS in fall 2008

• 2009 Highlights– Highest

• KTS 3 Climate 2.90• KTS 1 Content 2.78

– Lowest• KTS 5 Assessment 2.44• KTS 7 Reflection 2.46• KTS 8 Collaboration 2.54

CAP 3 Portfolios Holistic Scores: Past

NTS-Spring, 2008

Highest – NTS 4 Assessment 2.73– NTS 2 Climate 2.68

Lowest – NTS 5 Reflection 2.54– NTS 6 Collaboration 2.46

– NTS 3 Implement 2.42

KTS Fall, 2008Highest

– KTS 3 Climate 2.91– KTS 10 Leadership 2.85

Lowest– KTS 5 Assessment 2.51

P-5 CAP 3 Portfolios 2008-09

2

2.2

2.4

2.6

2.8

3

Holis

ticSc

ore

KTS

1Co

nten

t

KTS

2De

sign

KTS

3Cl

imat

e

KTS

4De

sign

KTS

5As

sess

KTS

6Te

chno

logy

KTS

7Re

flect

KTS

8Co

llabo

rate

KTS

9 Pr

of.

Gro

wth

KTS

10Le

ader

ship

Fall 2008

Year,2009

5-9 CAP 3 Portfolio Scores 2008-09

2

2.2

2.4

2.6

2.8

3

Holis

ticSc

ore

KTS

1Co

nten

t

KTS

2De

sign

KTS

3Cl

imat

e

KTS

4De

sign

KTS

5As

sess

KTS

6Te

chno

logy

KTS

7Re

flect

KTS

8Co

llabo

rate

KTS

9 Pr

of.

Gro

wth

KTS

10Le

ader

ship

Fall 2008

Year, 2009

8-12 CAP 3 Portfolio Scores 2008-09

2

2.2

2.4

2.6

2.8

3

Holis

ticSc

ore

KTS

1Co

nten

t

KTS

2De

sign

KTS

3Cl

imat

e

KTS

4De

sign

KTS

5As

sess

KTS

6Te

chno

logy

KTS

7Re

flect

KTS

8Co

llabo

rate

KTS

9 Pr

of.

Gro

wth

KTS

10Le

ader

ship

Fall 2008

Year, 2009

P-12 CAP 3 Portfolio Scores, 2008-09

2

2.2

2.4

2.6

2.8

3

Holis

ticSc

ore

KTS

1Co

nten

t

KTS

2De

sign

KTS

3Cl

imat

e

KTS

4De

sign

KTS

5As

sess

KTS

6Te

chno

logy

KTS

7Re

flect

KTS

8Co

llabo

rate

KTS

9 Pr

of.

Gro

wth

KTS

10Le

ader

ship

Fall 2008

Year, 2009

CAP 3: Portfolios by Majors- 2009

• Comparisons:– P-5:

• Highest KTS 3 Climate; Lowest KTS 4 Design

– 5-9 • Highest KTS 3 Climate; Lowest KTS 6 Technology,

KTS 5 Assessment

– 8-12:• Highest KTS 3 Climate; Lowest KTS 5 Assessment

KTS 7 Reflection

– P-12:• Highest KTS 3 Climate; Lowest KTS 8 Collaboration

KTS 5 Assessment

CAP 3 Portfolio Scores 2009

22.12.22.32.42.52.62.72.82.9

3

P-5Grades 5-9Grades 8-12Grades P-12

CAP 3 Growth Areas 2009

• KTS 5 Assessment– Communicating learning results 2.14– Allows student self assessment 2.20

• KTS 7 Reflection– Uses data to reflect and identify areas

for professional growth 2.26

CAP 4: 2009• 63 Approved Spring/Fall

Represents a steady increase over last four years

• Cumulative GPA: 3.55> than previous

• Major GPA: 3.62 (3.70/3.49)Overall > than last four years; f09 is <last two years

• Professional GPA: 3.76Comparable to previous

CAP 4 Clinical Experiences 2009

• Diversity– Ethnicity 97% >08, 07– Exceptionality 95% – Language 67% (59/81%) <– Race 92% < 08, 07– Religion: 76% >– Socioeconomic: 98% >– Gender: 98% > than previous

CAP 4 Clinical Experiences 2009

• Assisting: 100% > last 2• Instructing: 100% = to previous• Observing: 98% > 08, 06• Research: 75% < 06, 07• Tutoring: 79% < previous• Attend school board meetings• Interacting with families• Participate in education related

community events

CAP 4 Dispositions 2009* F06: New Instrument

Analytic

SP/F

Analysis

Overall 4.82/4.64 > 06,07; < 08

1. Caring 4.81/4.62 > 06,07; < 08

2. Respects 4.88/4.70 > 06, 07; < 08

3. Values ind. Diff.*

4.72/4.54 > 06, 07; < 08

4. Honest & ethical

4.93/4.74 > 06; < 08, =07

5. Responsible* 4.75/4.57 > 06, 07; < 08

CAP 4: Dispositions

2009

Holistic

Analysis

Cooperating Teacher 1

4.81 > 06, 07; < 08

Cooperating Teacher 2

4.73 > 06, < 08, 07

Supervising Teacher

4.63 > 06, < 08

Self Evaluation 4.85 > 08, 07, 06

CAP 4 Dispositions 2009

Univ. Supv. Self

• #1 Caring 4.62 4.87

• #2 Respects others 4.63 4.90

• #3 Values indiv. Diff.* 4.52 4.76

• #5 Honest/ethical 4.78 4.92

• #6 Responsible 4.57 4.77

classroom behavior*

CAP 4 Portfolios Fall 2009Holistic: 2.90/2.79

Analysis

KTS 1 2.92/2.77 2nd Highest (Content)

KTS 2 2.81/2.76

KTS 3 3.00/2.92 Highest (Climate)

KTS 4 2.89/2.78

KTS 5* 2.80/2.69 2nd Lowest (Assess.)

KTS 6 2.81/2.54 (Lowest NTS)

KTS 7* 2.79/2.80 Lowest (Reflection)

KTS 8 2.84/2.85

KTS 9 2.91/2.92 (Highest NTS)

KTS 10 2.91/2.81

CAP 4: Portfolios by Major, 2009Portfolio Scores: KTS

P-5 2.95 <5-9 3.00 8-12– Biology– English 2.33 <– Math 3.00– Soc. St. 2.75 <

P-12– Art 3.00– Music 2.82 <– PE 3.00

CAP 4 Portfolio Growth Areas 2009• KTS 5

– Lowest is ‘Communicates learning results’– Next lowest are ‘Describes, analyzes and

evaluates performance data’ &

‘Allows student self assessment’

• KTS 7– Lowest: ‘Uses data to reflect on and

identify areas for professional growth’

CAP 4: Univ. Supv./Coop. Tchr, Eval. 1-3 2008

NTS/KTS Univ. S Coop.T Analysis

KTS 1 Content 2.55-2.94 2.64/2.96 CT-Improved from MT to final

KTS 2 Design 2.61-2.95 2.71/3.00

KTS 3 Climate 2.72-2.92 2.79/3.00

KTS 4 Implement

2.44-2.88 2.59/2.98 CT-Improved most

KTS 5 Assessment

2.33-2.85 2.58/2.90 CT-Began lowest

KTS 6 Technology

2.69-2.89 2.77/2.98

KTS 7 Reflection

2.40-2.95 2.66/2.91

KTS 8 Collaboration

2.33-2.98 2.79/2.93 US-3rd most improved

KTS 9 Professional Gr

2.21-3.00 2.58/2.95 US-began lowest

US-most improved

KTS 10 Leadership

_____________

Holistic A + B

2.30-2.98 2.72.2.92

________

2.56/2.96

US-2nd most improved

CAP 4: Video Evaluations-Prof./Self

KTS Professor Self

EvaluationAnalysis

KTS 1

Content2.89/2.90 2.87/3.00

KTS 2

Design2.94/2.67 2.89/3.00

KTS 3

Climate2.91/2.85 2.92/3.00

KTS 4 Implement

2.82/2.86 2.68/3.00 Self-lowest overall

Professor-2nd lowest overall

KTS 5

Assess2.91/2.72 2.81/3.00 Self-2nd lowest overall

Professor-lowest overall

KTS 6

Technology3.00/2.81 2.88/3.00

CAP 4: Interview Ratings 2009Indicator Rating Trend over semestersPoised 4.79 > Last 2 years, highest

Articulate 4.56 < Last 2 years

Content Knowledge

4.54 < than 2/3

Pedagogy 4.49 > 2/3 years, lowest over time

Reflection 4.59 > Last 3 years

Q1: Meet KTS

4.54 > Last 2 years

Q2: Student Learning

Overall

4.45

4.56

Previous yearsPrevious years

CAP 4: Praxis Data--2009

• PLT: Passing Score of 161– P-5: 0522 177.58 < 06, 08– 5-9: 0523

• English-168; Math-180; Science; 176; Soc. St. 181• Soc. St/English-185; Math/Soc.St.-180

– 8-12: 0524 • English-158; Biology-179; Soc. St.-176; Math-184

– P-12 (Choice)• Music 169• Art 169• PE/Health 174

CAP 4: Praxis II Data 2009

• Level Passing Mean• P-5 148 168.42• 5-9

– English 158 159– Math 148 166– Science 144 148– Social St. 149 154– SocSt/Eng 149/158 160/192– Math/SocSt 148/149 166/168

Praxis II Data 2009 Passing Mean• Biology 146 185• English 160/155 181/158• Math 125/141 139/161• SocSt. 151/159 163/165

• Art 154/158 160/161• Music 145/154 148/161• PE/Hlth 147/151/630 152/158/677

Diversity Proficiencies: NTS Sp, 2008NTS CAP3

Port.CAP4 Port.*

NTS CAP4 Video CAP4 Co.T

CAP4 Un.T

1c 2.55 2.60 1-4,5 4.67 4.55

1d 2.87 2.85 4.62

1f 2.65 2.73

2b 2.74 2.85 2-3 4.78 4.40

2d 2.83 2.85

3c 2.57 2.49 3-4 4.64

3d 2.75 2.60

4d 2.67 2.58 4-1 4.61

5a 2.71 2.83 5-1 4.73

6a 2.58 2.70 8-2,5 4.73

8c 2.54 2.68 8-1,3 4.47 4.64 4.31

8e 2.63 2.73 9-9 4.58 4.20

9d 2.54 2.48 9-8 3.93 4.70

Diversity Proficiencies: KTS 2008/09KTS CAP 3

Portfolio

CAP 4 Portfolio

Coop.

Teacher

Univ. Supervisor

Video Evaluation

Indicator

1b 2.64/ 2.65

2.73/ 2.70

2.81*/ 2.84

2.77/ 2.88

2.76 2.72/2.78

Connects content to life experiences

1d 2.49/ 2.50

2.58*/ 2.83

2.82/ 2.83

2.79/ 2.86

2.62

2.72/2.68

Guides students to understand content from various perspectives.

2b 2.55/ 2.58

2.84/ 2.81

2.86/ 2.85

2.90/ 2.93

2.69

2.78/2.70

Uses contextual data to design instruction relevant to students.

3c 2.77/ 2.67

2.84/ 2.80

2.88/ 2.88

2.77/ 2.81

2.78

2.71/2.80

Values & supports student diversity & addresses individual needs

4b 2.43*/ 2.33*

2.78/ 2.67

2.82/ 2.80**

2.67*/ 2.85**

2.45*2.69*/2.76

Implements instruction based on diverse student needs and ….

5c 2.73/ 2.38*

2.81/ 2.50*

2.91/ 2.85

2.80/ 2.73*

2.682.81/2.65*

Regularly integrates technology …meet diverse student needs.

CAP 1 IECE: Fall 2009• Approved: 29 all locations• Overall GPA: 3.37• ACT: 22.13• PPST: 176.25 Reading 172.75 Mathematics 174.50 Writing

Note: IECE programs began in Fall 2009. Data for IECE are presented separately from other data; the IECE data will also be disaggregated by location.

CAP 2: IECE Fall, 2009

• Number approved: 6

• Grade point average: 3.40

• Foundations courses: 3.77

• Field Hours: 177.50

• PPD Hours: 20.25

IECE: Diversity Data 2009

• Age: 42% 26-35 38% 16-25%• Gender: 100% F• Exceptionality: 97% no• 2nd language:

100% No

• Father: 12% College• Mother: 27% College• Religion:

– 42% Christian– 24% Baptist– 15% Catholic– 9% Methodist

IECE Disposition Data: Fall, 2009

Prof. Prof. Prof. Self Overall

• Caring: 4.0 4.83 4.85 4.63 4.76

• Respects: 4.0 4.50* 4.85 4.69 4.63

• Values: 4.0 4.71 4.62* 4.56* 4.63

• Honest: 5.0 4.92 4.85 4.88 4.89

• ProfResp. 5.0 4.46 4.83 4.63 4.60*

MAE: CAP 5 Admission 2009

• 2009: 2 (13-2008)<from previous

• GPA: 3.69> all previous years

• Dispositions Mean: 5.00> all previous

MAE: CAP 6 & 7, 2009

• CAP 6 Continuation– Number approved: 9– Number of hours completed: 19– GPA: 3.96

• CAP 7 Exit – Number approved: 14– GPA: 3.93– Action Research project grade: 93.71/94.38<

previous year

MAE: Diversity Data 2009• Age: 60%-26-35; others 16-25

• Gender: 82% female, > previous

• Race/Ethnicity: 100% white

• Exceptionality: 0%, < previous

• Father’s Education: 100% HS

• Mother’s Education: 35% College

• Second Language: 0%

• Religion: – 40% Baptist– 25% Methodist– 20% Christian

Rank I Data: 2009/08• CAP 5:

– Number admitted 13/9• DOSE certification: 2/4• Gifted endorsement: 2/2• Professional specialty: 9/3

– GPA: 3.90/3.84

• CAP 6:– Number approved: 7; GPA: 3.96

• CAP 7:– Number approved: 7; GPA 3.95

Rank 1 Diversity Data 2009

• Age: 50% 36-45; 44% 26-35• Gender: 99% female• Race: 100% white• Exceptionality: 20% (66% GT; Asthma 33%)

• Father: 58% hs; 31% college• Mother: 66% hs; 32% college• 2nd Langauge: 7% Spanish• Religion: 46% Baptist; 25% Christian;

12% Catholic

Rank 1 Program Data 2009

• Dispositions:– CAP 5: 4.41– CAP 6: 4.52– CAP 7: 4.78– Overall: 4.60

• Culminating Project Average: 198/200

SED TRAC 2 Data 2009• CAP 1

– Admitted 06 & 07: 6– GPA: 3.75

• CAP 2– Approved 06 & 07: 7– GPA: 3.14– Field Hours: 73

• CAP 3– Approved 06-08: 6– GPA: 3.17– Field Hours: 103.14

SED TRAC 2 DATA 2009 Field Experiences CAP 3 CAP 4

– Assisting: 23% 100%– Instructing: 57% 100%– Observing: 57% 50%– Research: 55% 50%– Race/Ethnicity: 100% 50%– Exceptionality: 57% 100%– Gender: 57% 50%– Language: 2% 0%– Religion: 2% 0%– Socioeconomic -- 50%

SED TRACs 3 & 4 Data 2009• CAP 5

– 61 admitted (48-T3; 13-T4)

< previous years– Undergraduate GPA

• T3: 2.87; T4: 2.70 < than previous

– GRE• Verbal: T3: 363; T4: 334

T3> than previous; T4 < previous• Quantitative: T3: 375; T4: 385

< 08• Analytical: T3: 3.45; T4: 3.13

T3: >previous years: T4: < previous years

SED CAP 6 Tracs 3 & 4--2009

Approved 59/79

T3: 43;

T4: 16

< 06, 08

GPA T3: 3.91

T4: 3.66

T3: <07, 08

T4: < previous

Field Hours

T3: 38

T4: 38

>06, 07

< 08

SED: TRACs 3 & 4, CAP 7 2009

Approved T3: 38; T4: 22

Total: 60

< previous

GPA T3: 3.88; T4: 3.83 Similar

Field Hrs. T3: 72; T4: 45 <07, 08

Praxis II 0353: 157 Pass

T3: 159; T4: 167

0542: 172 Pass

T3: 180; T4: 179

T3 < previous

T4> 07, 08

SED: TRACs 3 & 4 Diversity 2009Age 56%: 26-35 years

15%: 16-25 years

22%: 36-45 years

Similar to previous years and average

Difference in Trac 3 & 4

Gender 73%F 27% male Fewer males than previously

Ethnicity 85.0% White

12.5% Black

2.5% Asian

Whites increasing

Exceptionality

0% < previous

Income 28%-$25-43,000

17%-$10-25,000

15%-$42-67,000

Fewer in lower two brackets

Father 55%-High School

19%-College

Similar to previous years

SED TRACs 3 & 4 Diversity 2009

Mother 59%-HS

8%-College

19%-Graduate

> Graduate

Language 4% Yes < previous

Spanish

Religion 29%-Baptist

30%-Christian

8%-Catholic

14%-Methodist

Fewer Methodists

SED: TRACs 3 & 4, CAP 7 Portfolios 2009KTS 1 2.76 Content: > 06-08

KTS 2 2.76 Design: > 06-08

KTS 3 2.81 Climate: > 06-08 Highest

KTS 4 2.76 Implement: > 06-08

KTS 5 2.62 Assess: > 06-08

KTS 6 2.58 Technology: > 06, 08; < 07 Lowest

KTS 7 2.63 Reflect: > 06-08

KTS 8 2.70 Collaborate: > 06-08

KTS 9

KTS 10

2.70

2.73Professional Growth: > 06, 07

Leadership: NA

SED TRACs 5 & 6, CAP 5 2009

Approved T5: 42; T6: 7

Total 49

> 06, 07; < 08

GPA 3.37/3.06

3.85/4.0

T5: > previous; T6 < 08, 06

Age 50%: 26-35

36%: 16-25

Fewer from 36-45 years

Gender 53%-Female

47%-Male

Number of males increasing

Ethnicity 74%-White

10%-Hispanic

15%-Black

> Blacks

Except. 0% Yes > 07, 05; GT, Hearing, Visual

SED: TRACs 5 & 6 Data 2009CAP 6: # App. 54 Comparable to 08; >

07, 06

GPA 3.83/3.88

Field Hours 33/37 <07, 08

CAP 7: # App. 43, 8 More T5, Fewer T6

GPA 3.88/3.92 Comparable

Field Hours 68/71 Comparable

Praxis II 0353 T5--176.84

T6--179.67> previous

0542 T5--184.6

T6—177.8T5<08, >06, 07

T6 < 07, 08; >06

Faculty Evaluations: Fall, 2008• All scores 4.0 & above, except 24 (Class.)• Highest scoring questions

– Q14: 4.55 Provides prompt feedback– Q11: 4.53 Communicates effectively…– Q16: 4.44 Available during office hours

• Lowest scoring questions– Q10: 4.00 Communicates interest in course…– Q1: 4.03 Objectives/requirements made clear– Q13: 4.09 Routinely holds class full period

• Scores lower than campus wide– Q10: -.26—Communicates interest; – Q1: -.24—Objectives requirements made clear– Q2: -.08 (Relates); Q3: -.05 (Mat.); Q17: -.05 (Compared.)

Faculty Evaluation Data f09• Regular Program:

– Instructor give sufficient number of tests to ensure fair evaluation (4.15/4.28)

– Materials are utilized (4.23/4.27)

• SED– I feel free to raise questions and participate

(3.70)– Variety of presentation techniques (3.97)

• ECE– Grading practices are fair (4.60/4.28)

• IECE– Course is well organized (4.20/4.25)

Additional Data Needed• Faculty Evaluations

– Evidence of using data for program improvement

• Plan for Follow-up Surveys of recent grads from all programs

• SACS: employment status of graduates

Title II UpdateWestat: Federal Database• Admission/completion/certified

• Annual Goals– Shortage areas of math, science, special education, ELL

instruction

• 7 Assurances1. Training responds to needs of local educational agencies2. Training linked to needs of schools3. Core academic subjects4. Training for children with disabilities, 5. Limited English proficiency 6. Low income families, 7. Urban/rural schools

Summary: Growth AreasTraditional Programs

– Dispositions: Lowest at CAP 1, 3 and 4• 3. Values individual differences• 5. Demonstrates responsible classroom behavior

– CAP 1 & 4 Interviews: • Impact on student learning (3.84/4.45)

– KTS (CAP 3 & 4, Video)• Assessment (communicates learning results)

– CAP 3 lowest for overall,5-9, 8-12, P-12, SED

• Reflection (using data for pd)– CAP 3 lowest for overall 2.46

– Diversity• 4b implement instruction based on individual student

needs• 5c regularly integrate technology to meet diverse student

needs• Ensure field/clinical experiences with linguistic diversity

Summary: MAE/Rank I Growth Areas

• MAE:– Data on major assessments used in the

program-Action Research project– Capability to show evidence of KTS– Diversity: 100% white

• Rank I– Collect evidence of KTS

Summary: Growth Areas-SED

• TRACs 3 & 4:– Portfolio: KTS 5/6 lowest (assessment &

technology)

• TRACs 5 & 6:– Major assessment data for KTS

Growth Areas: Progress• Collaboration: improvement

• New Teacher Survey– Old: #2 Community/background in planning

• Improved; still –.12

– New: #5 Designing/Using formative assessments to provide feedback to students and guide their learning -.18

• Diversity– Recruit diverse candidates and faculty

• Need to reinstate Pathways or other ‘good faith efforts’

– Implement unit diversity plan