czm great marsh_20131114sm
DESCRIPTION
Sea Level Rise: Natural Resource Impacts and Considerations for Great Marsh Community ResilienceTRANSCRIPT
Sea Level Rise: Natural Resource Impacts and Considera8ons for
Great Marsh Community Resilience
Julia Knisel, Coastal Shoreline and Floodplain Manager Kathryn Glenn, North Shore Regional Coordinator Massachuse8s Office of Coastal Zone Management
Coastal Inunda8on Mapping Elements • Water Level:
– Local @de ranges – Sea level rise data & projec@ons – Flood event data (surge & precipita@on)
• High Resolu8on Eleva8on Data: – Topographic & bathymetric LIDAR – Digital eleva@on models referenced to
@dal datums
• Natural & Human Responses: – Current ecosystems (beaches &
wetlands) – Landform changes (erosion & accre@on) – Physical barriers to migra@on
(development, seawalls, culverts, etc.)
Cri8cal Parameters for Modeling Marsh Migra8on
• If sediment accretes (traps on surface or accumulates) as fast as sea level rises, then marsh may avoid being converted or submerged
Marshes on the Move, 2011
Mean Higher High Water Tidal Datum
Sea Level Rise Scenarios
Historic Rate of Sea Level Rise (Boston Tide Gauge)
• Mean range (MHW-‐MLW) = 9.5 feet • Record = 1921-‐2012 (91+ years) • Sea level rise = 0.9 feet/100 years
Historic Sea Level Trends from 1921 to 2006-‐2012 (Boston)
• Linear mean sea level rates ( ) & 95% confidence intervals (mm/yr) calculated from 1921 to recent years (2006-‐2012) at the NOAA Boston @de gauge sta@on
• Values are trend of en@re data period up to that year
• Marshes accrete by trapping sediment & by organic ma8er accumula@on from roots & rhizomes
• Maximum accre@on for Great Marsh currently recorded ~ 6 mm/yr
Great Marsh Sediment Accre8on
Courtesy of Anne Giblin, Marine Biological Lab
Wetland Types
Water Unconsolidated Shore*
Salt Marsh
Brackish/ Transi@onal
Freshwater Wetlands
Mean Low Water
Mean Tide Level
Mean High Water
Mean High Water Spring
66% wetland Majority
Dry Lands
Eleva@
on
*includes silt, sand, or gravel that is subject to inunda@on and redistribu@on due to the ac@on of water; substrates lack vegeta@on
Marsh Migra8on Limited by Development & Infrastructure (Newbury)
Current 75-‐Year Time Horizon (2080)
Net marsh impact = MHHW + 4.5 l sea level rise – 1 l accre@on
Marsh Migra8on Limited by Development & Infrastructure (Salisbury)
Current 75-‐Year Time Horizon (2080)
Net marsh impact = MHHW + 4.5 l sea level rise – 1 l accre@on
Marsh Conversion to Unconsolidated Shore (Gloucester)
Current 75-‐Year Time Horizon (2080)
Net marsh impact = MHHW + 4.5 l sea level rise – 1 l accre@on
Marsh Conversion to Unconsolidated Shore (Salisbury)
Current 75-‐Year Time Horizon (2080)
Net marsh impact = MHHW + 4.5 l sea level rise – 1 l accre@on
Marsh Migra8on Modeling Resource www.csc.noaa.gov/digitalcoast/publica@ons/marshesonthemove
Applying SLR Data/Mapping
• Great Marsh communi@es are currently grappling with retrofinng areas that were developed before SLR and climate change issues were recognized
Applying SLR Data/Mapping
• Past experience
• What do we know now?
• What can we do differently?
• What have we learned?
Altera8ons that Limit Natural Resilience
• Development in flood prone areas
• Impervious floodplains • Culverted streams and
rivers • Tidal restric@ons • Armored river and coastal
banks • Hardened shorelines • Barriers to marsh
migra@on
NOAA photo
Altera8ons that Limit Natural Resilience
• Development in flood prone areas
Altera8ons that Limit Natural Resilience
• Impervious floodplains
Altera8ons that Limit Natural Resilience
• Confined stream and river beds
Altera8ons that Limit Natural Resilience
• Tidal Restric@ons • Causeways • Low-‐lying roadways
Altera8ons that Limit Natural Resilience
• Armored river and coastal banks
Altera8ons that Limit Natural Resilience
• Hardened shorelines
Altera8ons that Limit Natural Resilience
• Barriers to marsh migra@on
Photo: Maine Sea Grant
Altera8ons that Limit Natural Resilience
• Dams • Culverts
Sea Level Rising/Climate Changing: Key Resource Func8ons to Consider
• A8enua@on of flood waters • Ability of storm/flood waters to recede
• Sediment availability and transport
• Energy dissipa@on • Natural resource adapta@on
• Ecosystem con@nuity
AXenua8on of Flood Waters
• Limit impervious areas • Preserve open space in
developments • Incorporate LID • Avoid hardening
stream and riverbanks • Rethink new
development in flood prone areas
Ability of Storm/Floodwaters to Recede
• Limit new impervious/incorporate LID and
• Address restric@ons and inappropriate culvert designs
• Dam removal • Preserve open space in
developments • Where do floodwaters
go? • Consider ousall
loca@ons
AP photo
Reuters photo
Sediment Availability and Transport
• Unarmored banks • Bioengineering alterna@ves
• Re-‐nourishment • Open pilings for development
• Re-‐vegeta@on
Energy Dissipa8on
• Protect dune stability • Sediment supply • Maintain floodplain func@on
• Sol bank stabiliza@on techniques
Natural Resource Adapta8on
• Marsh migra@on and accre@on
• Barrier beach migra@on
Ques8ons?
Julia Knisel CZM Coastal Shoreline and Floodplain Manager 617-‐626-‐1191; [email protected] Kathryn Glenn CZM North Shore Regional Coordinator 978-‐281-‐3868; [email protected]