current advances and best practices in acute stemi ... · standard primary pci in stemi patients...

38
Frans Van de Werf, MD, PhD University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium Current Advances and Best Practices in Acute STEMI Management A pharmacoinvasive approach

Upload: others

Post on 01-Nov-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Frans Van de Werf, MD, PhD

University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium

Current Advances and Best Practices in Acute STEMI

Management

A pharmacoinvasive approach

12/10/2013

Frans Van de Werf:

Disclosures

Research grants for conducting trials on reperfusion therapy: Boehringer Ingelheim, Genentech, SanofiAventis, Proctor&Gamble, Wyeth

Speaker’s bureau:Boehringer Ingelheim, Genentech, SanofiAventis, Merck, AZ

Advisory board:Boehringer Ingelheim, Menarini, GSK, Merck, AZ, The Medicines Company

The Benefit of Reperfusion therapy for

STEMI is very much time dependent !

12/10/2013

12/10/2013

Progression of Cell Death versus

Time after Coronary Occlusion in Dogs

AP AP AP

Reimer and Jennings, Lab Invest 1979; 40: 633-44

40 minutes 3 hours 96 hours

= Nonischemic = Ischemic

(Viable)

= Necrotic

12/10/2013

Salvageable Ischemic Myocardium with

Respect to the Duration of Ischemia

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

40 min 3 hours 6 hours

Duration of occlusion

%

Reimer and Jennings, Lab Invest 1979; 40: 633-44

12/10/2013Tiefenbrunn AJ, Sobel BE. Circulation 1992; 85: 2311-5.

The Importance of Time to Reperfusion

12/10/2013

0

Ab

so

lute

Ben

efi

tt

per

1,0

00 T

reate

d P

ati

en

ts

0

20

40

60

80

3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24

Time to Treatment

The Importance of Time to ReperfusionA Meta-analysis of 50,246 Pts

in placebo controlled trials of Lytic Therapy

Boersma E, et al. Lancet. 1996; 348: 771- 5

Primary PCI : Time to treatment and 1-year

mortality as continuous function.

De Luca G et al. Circulation 2004;109:1223-1225

Every 30 minutes increase of

relative risk of 1-year mortality

of 7.5 %

Landmark Clinical Studies

The efficacy of intravenous streptokinase. GISSI-1, Lancet 1986

The additional survival benefit with upfront aspirin in combination with streptokinase. ISIS-2, Lancet 1988

The greater survival benefit with a fibrin-specific agent (tPA) as compared with streptokinase. GUSTO-I, New Engl J Med 1993

The superiority of primary PCI over in-hospital fibrinolytic therapy,Meta-analysis, Lancet 2003

12/10/2013

Early Mortality Rates (21-35 days) in

Major Randomized STEMI trials: 1986 - 2006

13.0

10.7

8.0

6.3

3.8 3.92.5

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

1986 1986 1988 1993 2006 2006 2008

Mo

rta

lity

%

GISSI-1

Control

n=5,852

ASSENT-4

Prim PCI

n=838

APEX-MI

Prim PCI

n=2,885

GISSI-1

SK

n=5,860

ISIS-2

SK +

Aspirin

n=4,292

GUSTO-1

tPA

n=10,396

HORIZONS

-AMI

n=3,340

The Benefit of ReperfusionORs by Year for In-Hospital All-Cause Mortality,

Stratified by Age (2003 = base)

Gale C P et al. Eur Heart J 2011;eurheartj.ehr381

Time delays remain a major problem !

12/10/2013

PTCA (n = 1466)

Thrombolytic therapy (n = 1443)

On-Site Thrombolysis vs Transfer for PCI

Death Non-fatal

Myocardial

Infarction

Total Stroke Haemorrhagic

Stroke

Death, Non-fatal

Reinfarction or

Stroke

20

15

10

5

0

Fre

qu

ency

, %

P = 0.057P < 0.0001 P = 0.049 P = 0.25

P < 0.0001

Keeley et al. Lancet. 2003.

Terkelsen, C. J. et al. JAMA 2010;304:763-771.

Mortality in 6209 Danish Patients With

STEMI Treated With Primary PCI

HORIZONS-AMI:

Median Door-to-Balloon Times

12/10/2013Blankenship et al Am J Card 2010;106:1527

Multivariate predictors of longer door-to-balloon time

in 2 298 pts from HORIZONS -AMI

Variable Estimate SE p Value

Presentation to non-angioplasty hospital 53.94 2.18 <0.001

Respiratory failure 41.55 13.79 0.003

Previous congestive heart failure 15.17 6.57 0.02

Presentation during daytime weekday hours −10.52 1.99 <0.001

Diabetes mellitus 9.30 2.75 <0.001

Previous angina 8.02 2.44 0.001

Men −7.08 2.36 0.003

Infarct-related artery: circumflex 6.26 2.02 0.002

Left ventricular ejection fraction −0.25 0.09 0.003

Blankenship et al. Am J Card 2010;106:1527

Hospitals with cath labs

UNITED STATES 18.0%

EUROPE 10.0%

BRAZIL 5.5%

CENIC REGISTRY, 2011, Brazil.

Only 55% of all PCI centres offer 24/7 PPCI service

Widimsky P et al. Eur Heart J 2010;31:943-957.

Door-In to Door-Out Time Among Patients

Transferred for Primary PCI in the USA

Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(21):1879-1886

Distribution of median door-in to door-out (DIDO) times for 1034 hospitals

reporting at least 5 patients in 2009

Problems and challenges in cardiovascular

emergencies

F. Van de Werf, ACC 2013

A strategy of early fibrinolysis followed by coronary angiography

within 6-24 hours or rescue PCI if needed was compared with

standard primary PCI

in

STEMI patients with at least 2 mm ST-elevation in 2 contiguous

leads presenting within 3 hours of symptom onset and unable to

undergo primary PCI within 1 hour.

STUDY AIM

F. Van de Werf, ACC 2013

no lytic

STUDY PROTOCOL

RANDOMIZATION 1:1 by IVRS, OPEN LABEL

Am

bu

lan

ce

/ER

Primary endpoint: composite of all cause death or shock or CHF or reinfarction up to day 30

ECG at 90 min: ST resolution ≥ 50%

Standard primary PCI

Aspirin

Clopidogrel:

LD 300 mg + 75 mg QD

Enoxaparin:

30 mg IV + 1 mg/kg SC Q12h

Antiplatelet and

antithrombin treatment

according to local standards

angio >6 to 24 hrs

PCI/CABG if indicated

immediate angio +

rescue PCI if indicated

YES NO

Strategy A: pharmaco-invasive Strategy B: primary PCI

Aspirin

Clopidogrel:

75 mg QD

Enoxaparin:

0.75 mg/kg SC Q12h

PC

I H

os

pit

al

STEMI <3 hrs from onset symptoms, PPCI <60 min not possible, 2 mm ST-elevation in 2 leads

≥75y: ½ dose TNK<75y:full dose After 20% of the planned

recruitment, the TNK dose

was reduced by 50% among

patients ≥75 years of age.

F. Van de Werf, ACC 2013

PATIENTS PER COUNTRY

F. Van de Werf, ACC 2013

62

Sx onset

1st Medical

contact

61

1 Hour 2 Hoursn=1892

29

Randomize IVRS

9

Rx TNK

31 86

Sx onset

Rx PPCI

100 min

178 min

MEDIAN TIMES TO TREATMENT (min)

1st Medical

contact

78 min

differenceRandomize IVRS

F. Van de Werf, ACC 2013

62

Sx onset

61

1 Hour 2 Hours

29 9

Rx TNK

31 86

Sx onset

Rx PPCI

100 min

178 min

MEDIAN TIMES TO TREATMENT (min)

36% Rescue PCI at 2.2h

n=1892

64% non-urgent cath at 17h

1st Medical

contactRandomize IVRS

1st Medical

contact Randomize IVRS

F. Van de Werf, ACC 2013

TIMI FLOW RATES

TIMI before PCI TIMI after PCI

P<0.001 P=0.41

F. Van de Werf, ACC 2013

INVASIVE PROCEDURES

Pharmaco-invasive

(N=944)

PPCI

(N=948)

P-value

PCI performed 80% 90% <0.001

Stents deployed 96% 96% 0.95

CABG performed 4.7% 2.1% 0.002

F. Van de Werf, ACC 2013

PRIMARY ENDPOINT

TNK 12.4%

PPCI 14.3%

TNK vs PPCI

Relative Risk 0.86, 95%CI (0.68-1.09)

p=0.24

Dth

/Sh

ock

/CH

F/R

eM

I (%

)

The 95% CI of the observed incidence in the pharmaco-invasive arm would

exclude a 9% relative excess compared with PPCI

F. Van de Werf, ACC 2013

SINGLE ENDPOINTS UP TO 30 DAYS

Pharmaco-invasive

(N=944)

PPCI

(N=948)

P-value

All cause death

Cardiac death

(43/939) 4.6%

(31/939) 3.3%

(42/946) 4.4%

(32/946) 3.4%

0.88

0.92

Congestive heart failure (57/939) 6.1% (72/943) 7.6% 0.18

Cardiogenic shock (41/939) 4.4% (56/944) 5.9% 0.13

Reinfarction (23/938) 2.5% (21/944) 2.2% 0.74

F. Van de Werf, ACC 2013

>

Subgroup analyses for primary endpoint within 30 days

Relative Risk (95%CI)

OVERALL

Age <75 years≥75 years

P(interaction)

0.63

0.81

0.71

0.16

0.23

0.06

Time to randomization 0 to <2h≥2h

MaleFemale

Systolic blood pressure <100 mmHg100 to <140 mmHg140 to <160 mmHg≥160 mmHg

Killip class III-IV

Anterior MIInferior MIOther MI

TNK Better PPCI Better

F. Van de Werf, ACC 2013

Subgroup analyses for primary endpoint within 30 days

Relative Risk (95%CI)

Hypertension, Yes

P(interaction)

0.34

0.24

0.68

0.13

Diabetes, YesNo

Place of randomization, AmbulanceCommunity hospital

Before Amendment

TNK Better PPCI Better

>

>

No

Weight, <60 kg

60 to <90 kg≥90 kg

TIMI Risk Score, <5 points≥5 points

After Amendment

0.35

0.71

p=0.07

F. Van de Werf, ACC 2013

STROKE RATESPharmaco-invasive PPCI P-value

TOTAL POPULATION (N=1892)

Total stroke

fatal stroke

Haemorrhagic stroke

fatal haemorrhagic stroke

15/939 (1.60%)

7/939 (0.75%)

9/939 (0.96%)

6/939 (0.64%)

5/946 (0.53%)

4/946 (0.42%)

2/946 (0.21%)

2/946 (0.21%)

0.03

0.39

0.04

0.18

POST AMENDMENT POPULATION (N=1503)

Total stroke

fatal stroke

Haemorrhagic stroke

fatal haemorrhagic stroke

9/747 (1.20%)

3/747 (0.40%)

4/747 (0.54%)

2/747 (0.27%)

5/756 (0.66%)

4/756 (0.53%)

2/756 (0.26%)

2/756 (0.26%)

0.30

>0.999

0.45

>0.999

F. Van de Werf, ACC 2013

IN-HOSPITAL BLEEDING COMPLICATIONS

Pharmaco-invasive

(N=944)

PPCI

(N=948)

P-value

Major non-ICH bleeding 6.5% 4.8% 0.11

Minor non-ICH bleeding 21.8% 20.2% 0.40

Blood transfusions 2.9% 2.3% 0.47

F. Van de Werf, ACC 2013

CONCLUSIONS

A strategy of fibrinolysis with bolus tenecteplase and contemporary

antithrombotic therapy given before transport to a PCI-capable

hospital coupled with timely coronary angiography :

circumvents the need for an urgent procedure in about two thirds of

fibrinolytic treated STEMI patients.

is associated with a small increased risk of intracranial bleeding.

is as effective as primary PCI in STEMI patients presenting within 3

hours of symptom onset who cannot undergo primary PCI within

one hour of first medical contact.

F. Van de Werf, ACC 2013

12/10/2013

Reperfusion: Conclusions Anno 2013

Reperfusion therapy is the most effective treatment to offer to

STEMI patients and is its broad application has significantly

reduced case fatality rates both in studies and in the real world

over the last 20 years

Major efforts are still needed to shorten delay times especially in

patients presenting first to facilities without a cath lab

Distances,weather and traffic conditions are a frequent reason

why patients can’t get timely PCI

Especially in patients presenting early to an ambulance system

or hospital without a cath lab fibrinolytic therapy should be

considered when there is any doubt about timely PCI

12/10/2013

12/10/2013

STE ACS Primary PCI vs

In-HospitalThrombolysis : Clinical Outcomes

Keeley and Grines Lancet. 2003.

Fre

qu

en

cy, %

50

40

30

20

10

0

25

20

15

10

5

0

Death Death,Excluding

SHOCK Data

Non-fatalMyocardialInfarction

RecurrentIschemia

TotalStroke

HaemorrhagicStroke

MajorBleed

Death, Non-fatalReinfarction,

or Stroke

Long-Term Outcomes

Short-Term Outcomes

P = 0.0019 P = 0.0053 P < 0.0001

P < 0.0001

P < 0.0001

P = 0.0002 P = 0.0003 P < 0.0001

P < 0.0001

P < 0.0001

P = 0.0032P < 0.0001P = 0.0004

- - -

PTCA

Thrombolytic therapy

Death Death,Excluding

SHOCK Data

Non-fatalMyocardialInfarction

RecurrentIschemia

TotalStroke

HaemorrhagicStroke

MajorBleed

Death, Non-fatalReinfarction,

or Stroke