cs to brick and track follow-up ● cosmic ray test ● cs scanning ● cs to brick connection ●...

21
CS to brick and track follow-up Cosmic ray test CS scanning CS to brick connection Track following Napoli Scanning Lab

Post on 22-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: CS to brick and track follow-up ● Cosmic ray test ● CS scanning ● CS to brick connection ● Track following Napoli Scanning Lab

CS to brick and track follow-up

● Cosmic ray test● CS scanning● CS to brick connection● Track following

Napoli Scanning Lab

Page 2: CS to brick and track follow-up ● Cosmic ray test ● CS scanning ● CS to brick connection ● Track following Napoli Scanning Lab

Cosmic ray test performed in November

● Brick with CS brought out of the gallery

● Kept for about 4 minutes at the surface

● Integrating about 100 tracks on the whole surface

● Going back to the underground lab

● Attach a second CS doublet and expose to cosmic rays in the pit for 24 hours

CS doublet

Cosmic rays

Page 3: CS to brick and track follow-up ● Cosmic ray test ● CS scanning ● CS to brick connection ● Track following Napoli Scanning Lab

Scanning of the cosmic-ray test bricks

● CS doublets (European part) were scanned at Gran Sasso

● After the first area scanning performed at Gran Sasso, one CSD was sent to Naples

● Enlarged the statistics (all the surface)● CSD scanning and results● CS to brick connection● Brick scan-back

Page 4: CS to brick and track follow-up ● Cosmic ray test ● CS scanning ● CS to brick connection ● Track following Napoli Scanning Lab

Scanning station for 6 bricks

CS1 and CS2 scanning:● minimum number of grains = 7● “expansion” filter● fixed cutoffs● 15 layers

Up/down linking:● minimum number of grains = 7● Delta X,Y = 30 µm● Delta TX,TY = 40*(1+4*) mrad

CS1/CS2 tracking● Delta X,Y = 40 µm● Delta TX,TY = 25 mrad● N = N

CS1 + N

CS2 = 40 grains

● quality cut: SIGMA < N * 0.13 - 1.3

Napoli laboratory: brick #973

CS1 and CS2 scanning:● minimum number of grains = 7● “expansion” filter● cut-offs tuned on the CS2● 16 layers

Candidates in the CS sheets:● Delta X,Y = 120 µm● Delta TX,TY = 50 mrad

Page 5: CS to brick and track follow-up ● Cosmic ray test ● CS scanning ● CS to brick connection ● Track following Napoli Scanning Lab

CS1 and CS2 scanning

Page 6: CS to brick and track follow-up ● Cosmic ray test ● CS scanning ● CS to brick connection ● Track following Napoli Scanning Lab

SIGMA0 1 6. 6. .010 .010 # sigmaX sigmaY sigmaTX sigmaTYDEGRAD 1 4 # angular degradation: sig(tx) = sig(0)*(1+deg*tx)BINS 1 5 5 5 5 # bin*sigma = acceptanceCHI2MAX 1 3.5 # chi2 simpleCHI2PMAX 1 3.5 # chi2 with puls weighting (ramp used)

Up/down linking parameters: building the base-tracks

CHI2MODE 0 3SIGMA0 0 40. 40. .005 .005DEGRAD 0 4.BINS 0 3 3 5 5CHI2MAX 0 5.5CHI2PMAX 0 5.5

CS1/CS2 tracking parameters: building the doublet tracks

xy= 40µm 3 cut txty = 5mrad 5 cut

degrading with the track slope

xy= 6µm 5 cut txty = 10mrad 5 cut

degrading with the track slope

Page 7: CS to brick and track follow-up ● Cosmic ray test ● CS scanning ● CS to brick connection ● Track following Napoli Scanning Lab

CS1-to-CS2 alignment with data scanned at Gran SassoCandidates for 6 european bricks

109 (102 with grains>=40) events in 16*6 = 96 cm2

6x5=30µm 3.4x5=17µm

5x5=25mrad5x5=25mrad

40 grains

x = 6µm

tx = 5mrad

Page 8: CS to brick and track follow-up ● Cosmic ray test ● CS scanning ● CS to brick connection ● Track following Napoli Scanning Lab

CS1-to-CS2 alignment for brick 3000973Candidates: 93 (79 with grains>=42) events in 96 cm2

(8.6x11.1cm2)

x = 15µm y = 4µm

tx = 4mradty = 4mrad

42 grains

Page 9: CS to brick and track follow-up ● Cosmic ray test ● CS scanning ● CS to brick connection ● Track following Napoli Scanning Lab

Y residuals vs. X and Y positionYCS2 - YCS1 - TYCS1*300

Y (µm)X (µm)

Page 10: CS to brick and track follow-up ● Cosmic ray test ● CS scanning ● CS to brick connection ● Track following Napoli Scanning Lab

X residuals vs. X and Y position

X (µm) Y (µm)

XCS2 - XCS1 - TXCS1*300

12 cm 10 cm

Page 11: CS to brick and track follow-up ● Cosmic ray test ● CS scanning ● CS to brick connection ● Track following Napoli Scanning Lab

X residuals vs. X and Y position (2D view)

mark #1

mark #2

mark #3mark #4

30 µm offset

Page 12: CS to brick and track follow-up ● Cosmic ray test ● CS scanning ● CS to brick connection ● Track following Napoli Scanning Lab

Summary of CS to CS connection● After a cut on the number of grains (42 out of 64) 74

tracks remained predicted onto the brick after the extrapolation of 4700 µm

Position distribution Angle distribution

Page 13: CS to brick and track follow-up ● Cosmic ray test ● CS scanning ● CS to brick connection ● Track following Napoli Scanning Lab

Data quality of films inside the brickhigh fog (>=10/1000 µm3) and Compton

Micro-tracks per viewClusters per view

3 inter-calibration areas 1cm2

~500 base-tracks/mm2 (<0.5)after quality cut ~15/mm2

Page 14: CS to brick and track follow-up ● Cosmic ray test ● CS scanning ● CS to brick connection ● Track following Napoli Scanning Lab

Measured gap between CS and brick4450 µm measured value (4700 µm nominal)

220 µmcorrection

270 µmcorrection

Page 15: CS to brick and track follow-up ● Cosmic ray test ● CS scanning ● CS to brick connection ● Track following Napoli Scanning Lab

CS to brick connectionposition accuracy

= 70µm = 54µm

12 cm

x (µm)

finding rate= 47/74 = (64±6)%

Page 16: CS to brick and track follow-up ● Cosmic ray test ● CS scanning ● CS to brick connection ● Track following Napoli Scanning Lab

CS to brick connectionangular accuracy

= 9mrad = 12mrad

Page 17: CS to brick and track follow-up ● Cosmic ray test ● CS scanning ● CS to brick connection ● Track following Napoli Scanning Lab

CS to brick connectionposition and angular distribution of candidates

validated by manual check

12 cm

9 cm

Page 18: CS to brick and track follow-up ● Cosmic ray test ● CS scanning ● CS to brick connection ● Track following Napoli Scanning Lab

Connection of plate 1 to 2position accuracy

all candidates validated by manual check

x = 16µm y = 12µm

= 41/47 = (87±5)%

Page 19: CS to brick and track follow-up ● Cosmic ray test ● CS scanning ● CS to brick connection ● Track following Napoli Scanning Lab

Connection of plate 1 to 2angular accuracy

all candidates validated by manual check

tx = 8.6mrad ty = 7.9mrad

Page 20: CS to brick and track follow-up ● Cosmic ray test ● CS scanning ● CS to brick connection ● Track following Napoli Scanning Lab

Connection of plate 2 to 3: position accuracyall candidates validated by manual check

tx = 7mrad tx = 6.4mrad

y = 8µmx = 13µm= 39/41 = (95±3)%

Page 21: CS to brick and track follow-up ● Cosmic ray test ● CS scanning ● CS to brick connection ● Track following Napoli Scanning Lab

Conclusions● 74 tracks found on the CS doublet (~ 96 cm2) but not manually

checked

● Position dependence of the X offsets

● High fog density (10/1000 µm3) on the films inside the brick

● 47 tracks found in the first plate of the brick and manually confirmed

● 65% of connecting efficiency (physics, instrumental, etc.)

● 41 tracks found on the second plate (manually confirmed)

● 39 tracks found on the third plate (manually confirmed)