crt report 2013
DESCRIPTION
CRT Report 2013. Park City school district. PSCD Strengths. For the past 10 years, a greater percentage of PCSD students have demonstrated proficiency, in all core subject areas, than the Utah state average - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
CRT REPORT 2013PARK CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
PSCD STRENGTHS
• For the past 10 years, a greater percentage of PCSD students have demonstrated proficiency, in all core subject areas, than the Utah state average
• There has been a 41% increase in the number of Hispanic students and a 31% increase in Low Income students since 2004, there have been consistent increases in overall proficiency rates in all subjects
• 5 out of 7 schools have demonstrated consistent improvement in proficiency rates in all subject areas over the past 10 years.
• 7 out of 7 have demonstrated overall increases in Language Arts
• 6 out of 7 have demonstrated overall increases in Math• 6 out of 7 have demonstrated overall increases in Science
• All schools have made significant strides in closing the achievement gap in all subjects
District Wide and State
Comparisons
2013 CRT PROFICIENCY
Language Arts Math Science
91%84% 84%84%
73% 73%
PSCDUtah
CRT PROFICIENCY RATES OVERTIME
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
86% 85%
88% 89% 89%90% 91% 92% 92% 91%
76% 77% 78% 77% 78% 79%81%
82%84% 84%
Language Arts
PCSD Utah
*Indicates Statistically Significantly Different from 2013
CRT PROFICIENCY RATES OVERTIME
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
85%83%
87%85% 86%
83% 82% 82% 82%84%
70%72% 72%
70%71%
66%68% 69% 69%
73%
Math
PCSD Utah
*Indicates Statistically Significantly Different from 2013Mathematics scores from 2009 received a new cut score which changed the scaling and equating. Data from 2009 and on are not comparable to prior years.
CRT PROFICIENCY RATES OVERTIME
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
80%
83% 84%82% 82%
84% 85% 84% 84% 84%
0.7 0.70.72 0.73
Science
PCSD Utah
*Indicates Statistically Significantly Different from 2013State data reports do not include CRT science scores past 2010.
TRENDS OVERTIME BY SUBJECT
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
86%85%
88%89% 89% 90%
91%92% 92%
91%
85%83%
87%85% 86%
83%82% 82% 82%
84%
80%
83%84%
82% 82%
84%85%
84% 84% 84%
Park City
Language Arts Math Science
*Indicates Statistically Significantly Different from 2013
Closing the Achievement Gap
CLOSING THE ACHIEVEMENT GAP
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%96%
88%
68%
Language Arts
PCSD Caucasian PCSD Hispanic Utah Causcasian Utah Hispanic
% P
rofi
cie
nt
*Indicates Statistically Significantly Different from 2013
CLOSING THE ACHIEVEMENT GAP
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
90%
60%
78%
55%
Math
PCSD Caucasian PCSD Hispanic Utah Causcasian Utah Hispanic
% P
rofi
cie
nt
*Indicates Statistically Significantly Different from 2013Mathematics scores from 2009 received a new cut score which changed the scaling and equating. Data from 2009 and on are not comparable to prior years.
CLOSING THE ACHIEVEMENT GAP
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
92%
0.79
0.48
Science
PCSD Caucasian PCSD Hispanic Utah Causcasian Utah Hispanic
% P
rofi
cie
nt
*Indicates Statistically Significantly Different from 2013
CLOSING THE ACHIEVEMENT GAP
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0
100
200
300
400
500
60092% 91%
93% 94% 94% 95% 95% 96% 97% 96%
33%37%
43%
49%
54%
59%
65%69%
68% 68%
353
567
PCSD Language Arts
% Proficient Caucasian % Proficient HispanicLinear (% Proficient Hispanic) Hispanic N
% P
rofi
cie
nt
His
pa
nic
N S
ize
*Indicates Statistically Significantly Different from 2013
CLOSING THE ACHIEVEMENT GAP
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
90% 89%92% 91% 92%
88% 88% 88% 88% 90%
38%40%
49%
45%
51%
48%
52%
52%
57%60%
346
518
PCSD Math
% Proficient Caucasian % Proficient HispanicLinear (% Proficient Hispanic) Hispanic N
% P
rofi
cie
nt
His
pa
nic
N S
ize
*Indicates Statistically Significantly Different from 2013Mathematics scores from 2009 received a new cut score which changed the scaling and equating. Data from 2009 and on are not comparable to prior years.
CLOSING THE ACHIEVEMENT GAP
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
85%87%
89%87% 88%
90% 90% 91% 92% 92%
25%
33%
31%28%
32%
41%45%
42%
47%
47%
216
478
PCSD Science
% Proficient Caucasian % Proficient HispanicLinear (% Proficient Hispanic) Hispanic N
% P
rofi
cie
nt
His
pa
nic
N S
ize
*Indicates Statistically Significantly Different from 2013
PSCD AREAS FOR GROWTH
• District-wide Math proficiency rates have remained relatively constant across the past ten years.
• District-wide Science proficiency rates have remained relatively constant over the past ten years.
• Trend lines show progress, but the achievement gap continues to be an area of need and focus