cross-breeding dairy cattle in the usa cross-breeding … links/usa2.pdf · march 14, 2008...

1
71 LIVESTOCK NEWS MARCH 14, 2008 New Manure and Nutrient Management Centre 160 acres of machinery demonstrations Grass management seminars New varieties and trial plots Muck machinery demonstrations Latest products, services and advice 21-22 May 2008 The business day out for livestock farmers and contractors Proudly presented by the Royal Agricultural Society of England partnered by Yara. Seminars sponsored by Keenan IN stark contrast to Mike Osmundson and his clutch of dairy farmers in Califor- nia, university professor Les Hansen is still a mas- sive fan of the Holstein cow. He said the breed was not without its flaws (see ‘The problem with the Holstein’), and in-breeding was a huge problem, but the Holstein cow was still the best dairy animal in terms of production, udder quality, low cell counts and temperament. Yet he did not believe commer- cial dairy farmers should be milking her – and that was because overriding his love for the Holstein breed was a fasci- nation with heterosis. Heterosis (or hybrid vigour) was the science behind what Creative Genetics was pushing in California – the reason why the cross-bred cows were per- forming so well. Prof Hansen said crossing breeds with each other would always produce heterosis, so the resulting cross would always outperform its parents. That enhanced performance would be in terms of much bet- ter fertility, health, mortality and longevity, as well as a slight improvement in milk yield. Crossing would never ‘dam- age’ the Holstein breed and, in fact, it was in everyone’s inter- CROSS-BREEDING DAIRY CATTLE IN THE USA IN Les Hansen’s opinion, the problems associated with the Holstein breed were not so much to do with the push for increased yields, but the desire for size and sharpness. While production had a negative correlation with health and longevity, he said, size and sharpness did too, and brought disadvantages such as more calving problems, and did not provide any extra milk. He said the people showing pedigree Holsteins had a lot to answer for. Cross-breeding provides heterosis in offspring THE PROBLEM WITH THE HOLSTEIN Crosses gain body condition ‘for free’ HAVING started out trialling three-way crosses with Holstein, Montbeliarde and Jersey breeds, the University of Minnesota has dropped the Jer- sey andrecently, introduced the Swedish Red. This, linked with the fact the first cross-bred cows did not enter the milking herd until 2002, makes analysing the data very difficult, as it is too early to start comparing the different crosses. However, research student Amy Hazel has made some interesting discoveries about body condition and the ability for cows to get in calf. Comparing pure Holsteins, Montbeliarde cross Holsteins (F1) and Montbeliarde cross Jersey cross Holsteins (F2), she said both the F1s and F2s had more body condition than the pure Holstein – even though dry matter intake was the same for all three groups. The extra body condition was ‘free’ and, according to the data, did not cause calving difficulties or get metabolised by the liver after calving (a common problem in Holsteins). The cows with extra body condition got back in calf much sooner – F1s 33 days and the F2s 47 days earlier – a marked difference and huge economic advantage, according to Miss Hazel. She said they hoped to understand more about this by looking at early embryonic death and the uterine environment, but this would require more time, more cows and more money. Funding had been provided, a large chunk by Coopex Montbeliarde, so the next stage was to col- lect data from 10 large herds in Minnesota using Holstein, Montbeliarde and Swedish Red crosses. “Everyone in the Holstein breed says they want longevity and better health and better fertility, but they are leaving it to someone else while they can breed show cows,” he said. Prof Hansen said he was working within Holstein US, not against the organisation, to ‘provide a wake-up call’ and move towards ‘rounder, shorter’ cows. “I’m looking forward to the World Dairy Expo some day in the future when the judge says, ‘the first cow over the second cow because she’s smaller and rounder’.” est for the Holstein cow to keep improving, as the ‘gift’ of het- erosis would then be even greater for those crossing her, he said. Prof Hansen outlined a future where a handful of pedigree breeders would keep pushing the Holstein as far as they could, while commercial farm- ers would continue to cross with her and enjoy even better results. “The better the Holstein breed, the even better the het- erosis will be on top of that for the cross-breeders,” he said. The trick was to maintain het- erosis, and that was impossible with a two-way cross. Prof Hansen said the first cross (F1) would give 100 per cent hetero- sis, but if the second cross (F2) was with one of the original breeds, then heterosis would instantly half. If the F2 was a cross with a third breed, then heterosis would only reduce by a fraction and would then be sustained at a high level for as long as that three-way cycle of breeds was followed. A four-way cross would main- tain heterosis at an even higher level, but the science relied on each breed being completely dif- ferent to each other and Prof Hansen said he did not believe there were four distinctly differ- ent gene pools in the world dairy population. He said working with the Hol- stein, Montbeliarde and Swedish Red, as the Californian farmers were doing, worked well because the three breeds shared different ancestry. That was why he and his research team were mimicking the cross with the university dairy herd, ending its involve- ment with the Jersey, which had initially been used in its cross- breeding project “We like the Holstein and we really like the Montbeliarde for cross-breeding,” said Prof The climate alone makes the University of Minnesota a very different place to Calfornia, yet they are using the same cross within their herd – a cross that could work all over the world. Hansen. “We’re going to use the Swedish Red as well, but we’re done with the Jersey. Now could we find a fourth breed? What’s the fourth breed going to be for us?” Prof Hansen said the Red Dane was too similar to the Swedish Red to offer any advan- tage in a four-way cross. In a similar way, the Ayrshire, Dairy Shorthorn, Illawarra and Nor- mande breeds contained too much Holstein blood to work. The reason he was ‘done with’ the Jersey was because the research revealed ‘as many dis- advantages as advantages’ with the breed. The same was true of the Brown Swiss. The Swedish Red and Red Dane were actually part of a large group of breeds, which he referred to as the ‘Red Revolu- tion’. This included the Aussie Red, Finnish Ayrshire, German Angler and Norwegian Red. The challenge for farmers keeping those breeds pure was to keep them as a distinctly dif- ferent gene pool, he said. That would involve eliminating any Around 90 of the university's 125 milking cows are in a tied-stall barn, the rest outside on a loose yard. Holstein blood (a problem in the Danish Reds and German Anglers) and avoiding in-breed- ing. He encouraged them to work together and share knowl- edge and breeding pro- grammes. Prof Hansen encouraged the Ayrshires and Dairy Short- horns, ‘if they wanted a role on the world stage’, to eliminate Holstein blood and ‘join the Red Revolution’. He also warned the Montbeliarde breed not to intro- duce any more Holstein blood. It was currently operating at around 4 per cent and, in Prof Hansen’s opinion, should not go much higher. He said he realised some of the Californian dairy farmers were nervous about crossing back to the Holstein breed, but he said it was the best thing they could do in order to main- tain heterosis – but they were already on the right track by cross-breeding in the first place. “The future for commercial breeders the world over is prob- ably cross-breeding. We still need pure Holsteins, but 90 per cent of cows in the US are just cows, just kept for milk produc- tion, so who cares if they are cross-bred? It’s pretty clear that’s the way to go.” Any questions or com- ments on cross-breeding in the USA? Visit www.farm- ersguardian.com/livestock Amy Hazel.

Upload: others

Post on 20-Aug-2020

7 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: CROSS-BREEDING DAIRY CATTLE IN THE USA Cross-breeding … links/USA2.pdf · MARCH 14, 2008 LIVESTOCK NEWS 71 New Manure and Nutrient Management Centre 160 acres of machinery demonstrations

71LIVESTOCK NEWSMARCH 14, 2008

New Manure and Nutrient Management Centre

160 acres of machinery demonstrations

Grass management seminars

New varieties and trial plots

Muck machinery demonstrations

Latest products, services and advice

21-22 May 2008

The business day out for livestock farmers and contractors

Proudly presented by the Royal Agricultural Society of England partnered by Yara. Seminars sponsored by Keenan

IN stark contrast to MikeOsmundson and his clutchof dairy farmers in Califor-nia, university professorLes Hansen is still a mas-sive fan of the Holstein cow.

He said the breed was notwithout its flaws (see ‘Theproblem with the Holstein’),and in-breeding was a hugeproblem, but the Holstein cowwas still the best dairy animalin terms of production, udderquality, low cell counts andtemperament.

Yet he did not believe commer-cial dairy farmers should bemilking her – and that wasbecause overriding his love forthe Holstein breed was a fasci-nation with heterosis.

Heterosis (or hybrid vigour)was the science behind whatCreative Genetics was pushingin California – the reason whythe cross-bred cows were per-forming so well.

Prof Hansen said crossingbreeds with each other wouldalways produce heterosis, so theresulting cross would alwaysoutperform its parents.

That enhanced performancewould be in terms of much bet-ter fertility, health, mortalityand longevity, as well as a slightimprovement in milk yield.

Crossing would never ‘dam-age’ the Holstein breed and, infact, it was in everyone’s inter-

CROSS-BREEDING DAIRY CATTLE IN THE USA

IN Les Hansen’s opinion, theproblems associated with theHolstein breed were not somuch to do with the push forincreased yields, but thedesire for size and sharpness.

While production had anegative correlation withhealth and longevity, he said,size and sharpness did too,and brought disadvantagessuch as more calvingproblems, and did not provide any extra milk.

He said the people showingpedigree Holsteins had a lot toanswer for.

Cross-breeding provides heterosis in offspring

THE PROBLEM WITH THE HOLSTEIN

Crosses gain body condition ‘for free’HAVING started out trialling three-way crosseswith Holstein, Montbeliarde and Jersey breeds,the University of Minnesota has dropped the Jer-sey andrecently, introduced the Swedish Red.

This, linked with the fact the first cross-bredcows did not enter the milking herd until 2002,makes analysing the data very difficult, as it istoo early to start comparing the different crosses.

However, research student Amy Hazel hasmade some interesting discoveries about bodycondition and the ability for cows to get in calf.

Comparing pure Holsteins, Montbeliarde crossHolsteins (F1) and Montbeliarde cross Jerseycross Holsteins (F2), she said both the F1s and F2shad more body condition than the pure Holstein –even though dry matter intake was the same for

all three groups. The extra body condition was‘free’ and, according to the data, did not causecalving difficulties or get metabolised by the liverafter calving (a common problem in Holsteins).

The cows with extra body condition got back incalf much sooner – F1s 33 days and the F2s 47 daysearlier – a marked difference and huge economicadvantage, according to Miss Hazel.

She said they hoped to understand more aboutthis by looking at early embryonic death and theuterine environment, but this would requiremore time, more cows and more money.

Funding had been provided, a large chunk byCoopex Montbeliarde, so the next stage was to col-lect data from 10 large herds in Minnesota usingHolstein, Montbeliarde and Swedish Red crosses.

“Everyone in the Holsteinbreed says they want longevityand better health and betterfertility, but they are leaving itto someone else while they canbreed show cows,” he said.

Prof Hansen said he wasworking within Holstein US, notagainst the organisation, to‘provide a wake-up call’ andmove towards ‘rounder, shorter’cows. “I’m looking forward tothe World Dairy Expo some dayin the future when the judgesays, ‘the first cow over thesecond cow because she’ssmaller and rounder’.”

est for the Holstein cow to keepimproving, as the ‘gift’ of het-erosis would then be evengreater for those crossing her,he said.

Prof Hansen outlined a futurewhere a handful of pedigreebreeders would keep pushingthe Holstein as far as theycould, while commercial farm-ers would continue to crosswith her and enjoy even betterresults. “The better the Holsteinbreed, the even better the het-erosis will be on top of that forthe cross-breeders,” he said.

The trick was to maintain het-erosis, and that was impossiblewith a two-way cross. ProfHansen said the first cross (F1)would give 100 per cent hetero-sis, but if the second cross (F2)was with one of the originalbreeds, then heterosis wouldinstantly half.

If the F2 was a cross with athird breed, then heterosiswould only reduce by a fractionand would then be sustained ata high level for as long as thatthree-way cycle of breeds wasfollowed.

A four-way cross would main-tain heterosis at an even higherlevel, but the science relied oneach breed being completely dif-ferent to each other and ProfHansen said he did not believethere were four distinctly differ-ent gene pools in the worlddairy population.

He said working with the Hol-stein, Montbeliarde andSwedish Red, as the Californianfarmers were doing, workedwell because the three breedsshared different ancestry.

That was why he and hisresearch team were mimickingthe cross with the universitydairy herd, ending its involve-ment with the Jersey, which hadinitially been used in its cross-breeding project

“We like the Holstein and wereally like the Montbeliardefor cross-breeding,” said Prof

The climate alone makes the University of Minnesota a very different place to Calfornia, yetthey are using the same cross within their herd – a cross that could work all over the world.

Hansen. “We’re going to usethe Swedish Red as well, butwe’re done with the Jersey.Now could we find a fourthbreed? What’s the fourth breedgoing to be for us?”

Prof Hansen said the RedDane was too similar to theSwedish Red to offer any advan-tage in a four-way cross. In asimilar way, the Ayrshire, DairyShorthorn, Illawarra and Nor-mande breeds contained toomuch Holstein blood to work.

The reason he was ‘done with’the Jersey was because the

research revealed ‘as many dis-advantages as advantages’ withthe breed. The same was true ofthe Brown Swiss.

The Swedish Red and RedDane were actually part of alarge group of breeds, which hereferred to as the ‘Red Revolu-tion’. This included the AussieRed, Finnish Ayrshire, GermanAngler and Norwegian Red.

The challenge for farmerskeeping those breeds pure wasto keep them as a distinctly dif-ferent gene pool, he said. Thatwould involve eliminating any

Around 90 of the university's 125 milking cows are in atied-stall barn, the rest outside on a loose yard.

Holstein blood (a problem in theDanish Reds and GermanAnglers) and avoiding in-breed-ing. He encouraged them towork together and share knowl-edge and breeding pro-grammes.

Prof Hansen encouraged theAyrshires and Dairy Short-horns, ‘if they wanted a role onthe world stage’, to eliminateHolstein blood and ‘join the RedRevolution’. He also warned theMontbeliarde breed not to intro-duce any more Holstein blood.It was currently operating ataround 4 per cent and, in ProfHansen’s opinion, should not gomuch higher.

He said he realised some ofthe Californian dairy farmerswere nervous about crossingback to the Holstein breed, buthe said it was the best thingthey could do in order to main-tain heterosis – but they werealready on the right track bycross-breeding in the first place.

“The future for commercialbreeders the world over is prob-ably cross-breeding. We stillneed pure Holsteins, but 90 percent of cows in the US are justcows, just kept for milk produc-tion, so who cares if they arecross-bred? It’s pretty clearthat’s the way to go.”

■ Any questions or com-ments on cross-breeding inthe USA? Visit www.farm-ersguardian.com/livestock

Amy Hazel.