creativity 0
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/28/2019 Creativity 0
1/48
Demographics, creativity, and
innovation
Mathieu BrummerMireya Campos
-
7/28/2019 Creativity 0
2/48
Timeline
Innovation related
HR strategies
HRM activities in
process and product
innovation
ExtendedHR issues
Meeting 12Meeting 2 Meeting 4 Meeting 8
ExtendedHR issues
-
7/28/2019 Creativity 0
3/48
Problem Statement
What is the link between demographic,
psychological, behavioral, and role factors with
innovation and creativity?
-
7/28/2019 Creativity 0
4/48
Agenda
Literature wrap-up Link of articles
Real life example
Interaction task
Conclusion
Feedback
-
7/28/2019 Creativity 0
5/48
Literature wrap-up
Article 1
-
7/28/2019 Creativity 0
6/48
Ancona and Caldwell
Impact of tenure and functional diversity
Internal
processes
External
communication
Effect on innovation and performance
-
7/28/2019 Creativity 0
7/48
Hypothesis 1
Internal task
processes
Internal task
processes
Tenure
diversity
Functional
diversity
(-) (-)(+) (o)
-
7/28/2019 Creativity 0
8/48
Hypothesis 2
External
communications
External
communications
Tenure
diversity
Functional
diversity
(+) (+)(o) (+)
-
7/28/2019 Creativity 0
9/48
Hypothesis 3
Internal task processes
Team-rated
performance
Managerial-rated
performance
(+)(+) (o)(o)
-
7/28/2019 Creativity 0
10/48
Hypothesis 4
External communications
Managerial-rated
performance
Team-rated
performance
(+)(+) (o)(o)
-
7/28/2019 Creativity 0
11/48
Hypothesis 5
Tenure diversity
Managerial-rated
performance
Team-rated
performance
(+)(-) (+)(-)
-
7/28/2019 Creativity 0
12/48
Hypothesis 6
Functional diversity
Managerial-rated
performance
Team-rated
performance
(+)(-) (+)(-)
-
7/28/2019 Creativity 0
13/48
Discussion point
Having investigated the impacts ofdiversity on team performance, howshould teams be formed in order to raiseinnovation and creativity according to
your view?
-
7/28/2019 Creativity 0
14/48
In-between summary
Diversity
(+)
Innovation, creativity,
and performance
(+)
(-) (-)
-
7/28/2019 Creativity 0
15/48
Recommendations
Team level Organizational level
Foster innovation and speed over
the full development cycle
Training and facilitation in
negotiation and conflict
resolution
Reward for team-based,
rather than functional-
based outcomes
Improves implementation and
enhances social integration
Conflict
resolution
-
7/28/2019 Creativity 0
16/48
Literature wrap-up
Article 2
-
7/28/2019 Creativity 0
17/48
Duchon, Ashmos, and Dunegan
Innovators Non-innovators
Demographics
Psychological
Behavioral
Roleperceptions
Effect on risk
(Innovation involves risk)
-
7/28/2019 Creativity 0
18/48
Results
Innovators
Role perceptions
Psychological
Demographics
Behavioral
Younger
Shorter tenure
Better educatedMore females
Higher risk taking scores
Higher innovation scores
Inclined to fund
uncertain projects
Perceive lower level of risk
More uncertainty
Low analyzability but high variety
More interdependent
relationships
-
7/28/2019 Creativity 0
19/48
Discussion point
By identifying and hiring risk takers,organizations enhance their capacity tobe innovative!
-
7/28/2019 Creativity 0
20/48
In-between summary
Effective deployment of HR requiresmatching people with roles.
A firm does not need too manyinnovators, because most tasks are
routine, not innovative.
Firms need both innovators and adaptors
-
7/28/2019 Creativity 0
21/48
Literature wrap-up
Article 3
-
7/28/2019 Creativity 0
22/48
Oldham and Cummings
Impact of creativity-relevant personal characteristics
Job
complexitySupportive
supervision
Employee creative performance
Controling
supervision
Traditional outcomes
-
7/28/2019 Creativity 0
23/48
Employee creative performance
Employee creative performance
Patents
written
Improved
suggestions
Ratings of
creativity
-
7/28/2019 Creativity 0
24/48
Hypothesis 1
Creative performance
Score on
CPS
(+)
Patents
written
Improved
suggestions
Ratings of
creativity
CPS = Creative personality scale
-
7/28/2019 Creativity 0
25/48
Job complexity
Impact of creativity-relevant personal characteristics
Job
complexitySupportive
supervision
Employee creative performance
Controling
supervision
Job
complexity
-
7/28/2019 Creativity 0
26/48
Hypothesis 2
Creative performance
Score on
MPS
(+)
Patents
written
Improved
suggestions
Ratings of
creativity
MPS = Motivating potential score
(Job complexity)
-
7/28/2019 Creativity 0
27/48
Supportive supervision
Impact of creativity-relevant personal characteristics
Job
complexitySupportive
supervision
Employee creative performance
Controling
supervisionSupportive
supervision
-
7/28/2019 Creativity 0
28/48
Hypothesis 3
Creative performance
Supportive
supervision
(+)
Patents
written
Improved
suggestions
Ratings of
creativity
-
7/28/2019 Creativity 0
29/48
Controlling supervision
Impact of creativity-relevant personal characteristics
Job
complexitySupportive
supervision
Employee creative performance
Controling
supervisionControling
supervision
-
7/28/2019 Creativity 0
30/48
Hypothesis 4
Creative performance
Non-controlling
supervision
(+)
Patents
written
Improved
suggestions
Ratings of
creativity
Partial support for H4,
investigating the effect
of CONTROLLING supervision
-
7/28/2019 Creativity 0
31/48
Joint contributions
Impact of creativity-relevant personal characteristics
Job
complexitySupportive
supervision
Employee creative performance
Controling
supervisionSupportive
supervision
Job
complexityControling
supervision
-
7/28/2019 Creativity 0
32/48
Hypothesis 5
Score on
MPS
Supportive
supervision
Noncontrolling
supervision
(+)
Patents
written
Improved
suggestions
Ratings of
creativity
-
7/28/2019 Creativity 0
33/48
Interactions
Suggestions
High
Low
MPS = Job complexityLow High
High CPS
Low CPS
-
7/28/2019 Creativity 0
34/48
Traditional outcomes
Traditional outcomes
Overall
workperformance
Intentions to
quit (turnover)
-
7/28/2019 Creativity 0
35/48
Results
Traditional outcomes
Main
effectsInteraction
effects
-
7/28/2019 Creativity 0
36/48
In-between summary
Employees produce the most creativework when they have:
high CPS
high MPS
are supervised in a supportive, non-controlling fashion.
-
7/28/2019 Creativity 0
37/48
Discussion point
Will a selection process based ondemographics, psychological, behavioral,and role factors lead to innovative teamperformance?
-
7/28/2019 Creativity 0
38/48
Recommendations
Management should consider bothpersonal and contextual factors.
Manage on individual bases.
-
7/28/2019 Creativity 0
39/48
Links for your enjoyment
Links between the articles
-
7/28/2019 Creativity 0
40/48
Innovation antecedents
Oldham and CummingsDuchon, Ashmos,
and Dunegan
Innovation and creativity
Attraction to complexity,
toleration of ambiguity,
and self-confidence
Fund uncertain projects,
perceive lower level of
risk
-
7/28/2019 Creativity 0
41/48
Sensitivity towards employees
Oldham and CummingsDuchon, Ashmos,
and Dunegan
Creativity and innovation
High CPS, high MPS,
supervised in supportive,
non-controlling fashion
People must be matched
to roles in the
organization
-
7/28/2019 Creativity 0
42/48
Predictors of performance
Oldham and Cummings Ancona and Caldwell
Personal and contextual
factorsContextual factors
CPS
MPS
Type of supervision
Tenure and
functional
diversity
-
7/28/2019 Creativity 0
43/48
From theory to practice
Real life example
-
7/28/2019 Creativity 0
44/48
Conclusion
What is the link between demographic,psychological, behavioral, and role factors
with innovation and creativity?
-
7/28/2019 Creativity 0
45/48
Conclusion
Ancona and
Caldwell
Oldham and
Cummings
Duchon, Ashmos,
and Dunegan
Contextual
factors
Personal and
contextual
factors
Personal
factors
-
7/28/2019 Creativity 0
46/48
Discussion point
Relate the theoretical frameworks to thearticles!
Role behavior theory
Resource based theory
Human capital theory
-
7/28/2019 Creativity 0
47/48
Feedback
Comments
Questions
Suggestions
-
7/28/2019 Creativity 0
48/48
Break
Enjoy Your Coffee!