copyright basics
DESCRIPTION
Copyright Basics provided by Origiin IP Solutions, BangaloreTRANSCRIPT
04/08/23
Bindu Sharma
Email: [email protected] Tel: 9845693459, 9880213204
Web: www.origiin.com
An overview on Copyright law
Intellectual Property
04/08/23
Types
04/08/23
4
Copyright
• Inherent & statutory rights for original/creative works of authorship
• 20th century- printing technology
• Term of protection is author's life plus 60 years
• The general rule is that copyright lasts for 60 years. In the case of original literary, dramatic, musical and artistic works the 60-year period is counted from the year following the death of the author. In the case of cinematograph films, sound recordings, photographs, posthumous publications, anonymous and pseudonymous publications, works of government and works of international organisations, the 60-year period is counted from the date of publication.
Copyright © 2009 Origiin IP Services
04/08/23
Legislations
• Copyright Act, 1957
• Compliant with most international conventions and treaties in the field of copyrights
• Berne Convention of 1886 (as modified at Paris in 1971)
• Universal Copyright Convention of 1951
• Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) Agreement of 1995
Copyright © 2009 Origiin IP Services
6
Criteria for protection
Idea
/E
xpre
ssio
n
Original/ Creative
FixedCopyright
Skill Judgment Labor
Copyright © 2009 Origiin IP Services
7
Subject matter
Literary Books, periodicals, computer programs, databases, tables & compilation
Dramatic Recitation, scenic arrangement & work capable of being performed by action
Musical Work consisting of music & graphical notation of such work
Cinematographic film and Sound recording
Soundtrack in a film, video tapes
Artistic Painting, sculpture, drawing, photograph, work of architecture & artistic craftsmanship
Copyright © 2009 Origiin IP Services
8
Is registration necessary
Copyright © 2009 Origiin IP Services
Registration
• Copyright Registry, New Delhi
– Filing
– Examination
– Grant
© 2008-2010, Sony Music Entertainment (India) Limited. All Rights Reserved. Unauthorized copying, reproduction, hiring, lending, public performance and broadcasting
prohibited.
• Poor man’s copyright
04/08/23
10
Who is the owner?
• Author of a work is the first owner of the copyright
• Work made by the author in the course of his employment is work for hire & belongs to the employer
• Employee is a person who works under direction of employer, uses equipment of employer and gets salary & other benefits
• Work done after office hours without directions of employer is not considered work for hire and author is owner of the work
Copyright © 2009 Origiin IP Services
Rights
• To reproduce work
• Issue copies
• Perform in public or communicate to public
• To make cinematographic film or sound recording in respect of the work
• To make translation of work
• To make adaptation of work
*Sell or give on hire, or offer for sale or hire any copy of program
Infringement
• Criminal offence under Section 63 of the Copyright Act
• Imprisonment for six months with the minimum fine of Rs. 50,000/-
• In the case of a second and subsequent conviction the minimum punishment is imprisonment for one year and fine of Rs. one lakh
• Metropolitan Magistrate or a Judicial Magistrate
• A police officer not below the rank of sub inspector can seize without warrant all infringing copies of the work
04/08/23
13
Reproduction of work
Making copies without owner’s consent
Literal/software piracy•Disk-to Disk & identical•May be accompanied by unauthorized duplication of genuine trademarks and documents
Non-literal •Does not look identical but function & purpose is the same•Proving infringement is difficult
Copyright © 2009 Origiin IP Services
14
Copyright controversy rocked the Lakme India Fashion Week at New Delhi with designer Suneet Varma threatening legal action against designer Aki Narula and actress Rani Mukherji for copying his clothes and using it in a song sequence of the movie Bunty aur Babli
Copyright © 2009 Origiin IP Services
Cantor Fitzgerald International v Tradition (UK) Ltd
Facts:• Employees copied the source code from a program developed for his former
employer
• The employees admitted to have copied 2952 lines (2%) of the 77000 lines of the code
• Most of the program modules were individually complied and linked together into a small number of programs, each of which could have been complied from a single source file
Literal copying
Does copyright subsist in the
program?
Has the program been
copied?
Is copied part substantial?
It’s infringement
Non-literal copying
Access
It’s infringement
Is there substantial similarity?
Structure/Flow/Sequence
CEAC
• Copyright Enforcement Advisory Council was established by the Central Government on November 6, 1991 to strengthen the enforcement of copyright
• Representatives of state police authorities as members
• Create greater awareness about copyright law among the enforcement personnel and the general public
• Special cells for copyright enforcement have so far been set up in 23 States and Union Territories
Fair use doctrine
Reproduction of work is not considered as infringement if used for:
• News reporting
• Criticism or comment
• Teaching
• Scholarship or research
• In connection with judicial proceeding
• Performance by an amateur club or society if the performance is given to a non-paying audience
Amar Nath Sehgal vs Union of India
• Union Government of India commissioned Amar Nath Sehgal, to design a mural (a mammoth 40 feet high and 140 feet long) for Vigyan Bhawan
• Design was given the green flag by Pt Jawahar Lal Nehru & was completed in 1962
• The mural won widespread acclaim, and gave the world a glimpse of the ‘real’ India – its farmers, artisans, women and children, their daily chores and celebrations, frozen in time, and molded from tons of solid bronze
• For nearly 20 years the mural attracted people from all over the world and became a landmark in the cultural life of the capital
• Vigyan Bhawan buildings were renovated and in the process, the mural was ripped off the walls and the remnants put into store
Amar Nath Sehgal vs Union of India
• Distressed by the destruction of his artistic work, and after petitioning the authorities for years without a response, Mr. Sehgal brought a lawsuit against the government
– Sehgal had assigned his copyright to the government in an agreement dated 31st October 1960;
– Govt had purchased all rights from Sehgal, and was consequently free to do as it pleased with the mural;
– Mural was already damaged in a fire in the Vigyan Bhawan;
– As per agreement, any grievance should be referred to an arbitrator appointed by Govt
Decision of Delhi High Court - All rights of the mural shall henceforth vest with Mr. Sehgal. The court ordered the return of the remains of the mural to the sculptor, and also slapped damages of Rs.500,000.
Moral rights
• The paternity right – Right to claim authorship of the work
• The integrity right – Right to protect his honor and reputation
• A general right – Not to have a work falsely attributed to him
Conclusion
• Wide coverage
• In-expensive
• Simple & quick
• India, Berne convention benefits
04/08/23
Thank you
Contact details:Bindu Sharma
Origiin IP Solutions LLP
Bangalore
Phone: 9845693459, 9880213204
04/08/23